alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Trent J. Carman, certify that:

1.  I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-Q  of  Air  Methods
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material  fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made,  in  light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading  with  respect  to  the  period  covered  by  this  report;

3.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of,  and  for,  the  periods  presented  in  this  report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing  and  maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-15(e)  and  15d-15(e))  for  the  registrant and have:

     a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or  caused such
disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to  be designed under our supervision, to
ensure  that  material  information  relating  to  the registrant, including its
consolidated  subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly  during  the  period  in  which  this  report  is  being  prepared;

     b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures  and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of  the  disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by  this  report  based  on  such  evaluation;  and

     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the registrant's most recent
fiscal  quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially
affect,  the  registrant's  internal  control  over  financial  reporting;  and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's  auditors  and  the  audit  committee  of the registrant's board of
directors  (or  persons  performing  the  equivalent  functions):

     a)  All  significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation  of  internal  control  over  financial reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize  and  report  financial  information;  and

     b)  Any  fraud,  whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees  who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting.


Date: May 17, 2004

/s/  Trent J. Carman
     ------------------
Trent J. Carman
Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY 

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE 

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498 

 OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

 August 14, 2012 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Supporting Documents for 2017-2025 Light-Duty (LD) Greenhouse Gas (GHG) 

Standards - Non-Copyrighted Website References to support the Solar Panel Credit Discussed in 

Chapter 5 of the Technical Support Document for the Final Rule 

FROM: Arvon L. Mitcham, Program Manager/Engineer 

TO: EPA Docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0799 

This memo covers documents for website references contained in Chapter 5 of the Technical 

Support Document (TSD) for the 2017-2025 Light-Duty (LD) Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Standards 

Final Rule. The following web addresses for the references are listed below and a copy of the 

webpage as it appears for each web address is included in the docket: 

• http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/old_data/nsrdb/1961-1990/redbook/atlas/; 

• http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/calculators/PVWATTS/version1/derate.cgi; and 

• http://global.kyocera.com/reliability/file02.html.
<PAGE>
 
                                                            EXHIBIT 23



                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
VALLEN CORPORATION

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No.
333-03915, 333-03917 and 333-03919) on Form S-8 of Vallen Corporation of our
report dated July 14, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Vallen Corporation and subsidiaries as of May 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related
consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders' equity and cash flows and
related schedules for each of the years in the three-year period ended May 31,
1997, which report appears in the May 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of
Vallen Corporation.



                                                     KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP



Houston, Texas
August 15, 1997
To:

Cc:

Bcc:

Subject: 

From: "Thompson, John E (OES)" <ThompsonJE2@state.gov>

To: Cindy Newberg/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Ross Brennan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 04/08/2010 12:57 PM

Subject: FW: For EO 12866 Review: EPA's Final 2010 Critical Use Exemption for Methyl Bromide

Phaseout

I’m assuming one or both of you can tell me if there is anything I care about in this. Any deviations from

past practice or pretty much same old stuff. I’m planning to clear with no comment (unless Jeff K spots

something) but let me know if there are particular policy issues to address.

From: King, Heidi R. [mailto:Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 9:45 AM

To: Thompson, John E (OES); Dhol.Herzi@ARS.USDA.GOV; Smith, Russell; Poster, Dianne L.

Cc: Lee, Amanda I.; Mancini, Dominic J.

Subject: For EO 12866 Review: EPA's Final 2010 Critical Use Exemption for Methyl Bromide Phaseout

Good morning,

Attached for your review under EO 12866 is EPA’s draft final Critical Use Exemption from the Phaseout

of Methyl Bromide.

Please provide comments one week from today: COB Friday, 4/15.

Thanks very much,

Heidi

X 54551
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         116,314
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,870
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    367,323
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        682,328
<ALLOWANCE>                                   (10,208)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,368,161
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,092,414
<SHORT-TERM>                                   117,281
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             12,167
<LONG-TERM>                                     27,657
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       109,443
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,199
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,368,161
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 16,505
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,863
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   715
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                24,083
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,551
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,047
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           13,485
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,209
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 14,526
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,999
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,999
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,442
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.54
<LOANS-NON>                                     10,924
<LOANS-PAST>                                        59
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 3,420
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
No. 11-10127.

#### Malam et ux. *v.*Holder, Attorney General.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Section A
#### AMADOR COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, Appellant v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, et al., Appellees

No. 16-5082

September Term, 2017

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Filed On: November 27, 2017

*721Dennis J. Whittlesey, Jr., Dickinson Wright, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant

Katherine Wade Hazard, Attorney, Mary Gabrielle Sprague, Esquire, Attorney, Jeffrey Heath Wood, Acting Assistant Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Environment and Natural Resources Division, Washington, DC, Judith Rabinowitz, U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Division, Commercial Lit, for Defendants-Appellees

Before: Garland, Chief Judge, and Pillard and Wilkins, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This petition for review was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. R. 84(j). The court has accorded the issues full consideration and determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. *See*D.C. Cir. R. 36(d). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order of March 16, 2016 be affirmed.

Amador County challenges the Department of the Interior’s authorization of gaming on land, known as the Buena Vista Ranchería, that is owned by the Me Wuk Tribe. Its suit turns on whether the Ranchería is a “reservation” within the meaning of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. *See*25 U.S.C. §§ 2703(4), 2710. In 1987, in *Hardwick v. United States,*No. C-79-1710 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 21, 1987), the County and the *Hardivide*plaintiffs from the Buena Vista Ranchería agreed to a stipulated judgment stating that the County would “treat[ ]” the Buena Vista Ranchería “as any other federally recognized Indian reservation,” and that “all of the laws of the United States that pertain to federally recognized Indian Tribes and Indians shall apply” to the Ranchería. Joint Appendix 31. As the district court found, the agreement’s plain language “unambiguously sets forth the parties’ intent that the County would treat the Buena Vista Ranchería as a reservation.” *Amador County v. S.M.R. Jewell,*170 F.Supp.3d 135, 144 (D.D.C. 2016). And as this court noted in an earlier appeal, such a “clear[ ] manifestation of] the parties’ intent to be bound in future actions” precludes the County from arguing here that the Ranchería is not an Indian reservation. *See Amador County v. Salazar,*640 F.3d 373, 384 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (citing *Otherson v. Dep’t of Justice,*711 F.2d 267, 274 n.6 (D.C. Cir. 1983)).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing *en banc. See*Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. R. 41.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE MARIA DUENAS,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-73449

Agency No. A079-521-732

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Jose Maria Duenas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to

reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Mohammed v.

FILED

SEP 28 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-73449

Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005), and we deny the petition for

review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Duenas’ January 9, 2008,

motion to reopen as untimely because it was filed over five years after the BIA’s

final order of removal, see 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i) (motion to reopen must be

filed within 90 days of final order of removal), and Duenas did not show he was

entitled to equitable tolling, see Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 897 (9th Cir.

2003) (deadline for filing motion to reopen can be equitably tolled “when a

petitioner is prevented from filing because of deception, fraud, or error, as long as

the petitioner acts with due diligence”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
No. 11-9978.

#### Applewhite *v.*Outlaw, Superintendent, Eastern Correctional Institution, et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applied Imaging Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Barry Hotchkies, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |     |  |                        |  |                                                  
|------------------ |  | --- |  | ---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 17, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/    BARRY HOTCHKIES
|                   |  |     |  |                        |  | Barry Hotchkies                                  
|                   |  |     |  |                        |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies this
Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
No. 11-1271.

#### Trustee of Nortel Networks UK Pension Plan et al. *v.*Nortel Networks, Inc., et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 4.17


 


English Language Summary


 


Authorization Agreement for Conditional Access Service– Termo Autorização de Serviço de Acesso Condicionado No. 25/2013


 



	
Parties:

	
Telefônica Brasil S.A., as authorizee, and Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações (ANATEL), as grantor.


	 	 
	
Date:

	
March 18, 2013.


	 	 
	
Term:

	
Indefinite


	 	 
	
Purpose:

	
Authorization to provide Conditional Access Service in private regime.


	 	 
	
Area:

	
Entire Brazilian territory.


	 	 
	
Amount:

	
The amount owed under the grant is R$9,000.00, which was paid at the time of execution of the Authorization Agreement.


	 	 
	
Penalty:

	
Breach of the Authorization Agreement and applicable regulations to Multimedia Communication Services may result in administrative proceedings by ANATEL, the application of warning sanctions, fines, temporary suspension or revocation of licenses.
Order filed July 10, 2012, Withdrawn, Appeal Reinstated and Order filed July 19, 

2012 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-11-00594-CR

____________

JACK M. MANISCALCO, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 434th Judicial District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 11-DCR-056387

ORDER

On July 10, 2012, this Court issued an order abating the appeal and directing the 

trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for failure to file appellant's brief. 

On July 17, 2012, appellant filed a motion to reinstate the appeal. Appellant's brief was 

filed July 16, 2012. The motion is GRANTED. Our order of July 10, 2012, is 

WITHDRAWN. The appeal is REINSTATED. Appellee's brief is due in thirty days.

PER CURIAM
Submitted September 29,

affirmed November 9, on appellant’s petition for reconsideration filed November 21, 2016,

reconsideration allowed by opinion February 23, 2017

See 283 Or App 911, 391 P3d 999 (2017)

#### In the Matter of K. L. H., a Child. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, *Petitioner-Respondent, v.*M. L. B., *Appellant.*

Wasco County Circuit Court

J13033; Petition Number J1303302; A161860

384 P3d 175

Shannon Storey, Chief Defender, Juvenile Appellate Section, and Shannon Flowers, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the briefs for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Inge D. Wells, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Judge, and Lagesen, Judge.

*204PER CURIAM

Mother appeals from a judgment terminating her parental rights to her daughter, K. Mother, who did not appear at the termination trial, argues that the judgment must be reversed because her attorney “mounted no defense on her behalf, which rendered his assistance inadequate.” However, as we recently have held, *because*mother did not appear at the trial, ORS 419B.815(8) prohibited her attorney from participating in the trial on her behalf. *Dept. of Human Services v. S. C. T.,*281 Or App 246, 261, 380 P3d 1211 (2016) (“Put another way, parents’ attorneys cannot save parents from the legal effect of parents’ absence by acting for parents to challenge the evidence presented.”). Mother’s claim of inadequate assistance necessarily fails for that reason. Because mother’s attorney was statutorily prohibited from presenting a defense at the trial, he was not inadequate for failing to do so.1 Accordingly, we must affirm. Our affirmance is without prejudice to mother’s ability to seek relief from the judgment pursuant to ORS 419B.923 on other grounds, if such grounds exist.

Affirmed.

1

 Mother does not suggest that she had a reasonable excuse for failing to appear, and that her attorney was inadequate for failing to request a continuance, which would present a different question. *See S. C.*21, 281 Or App at 261 n 8. Her sole contention was that counsel was inadequate for not presenting a defense at the termination trial.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8503 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8503

To authorize the honorary promotion to corporal of Private First Class 
             Delbert Littrell, United States Marine Corps.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 1, 2020

  Mr. Walden introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the honorary promotion to corporal of Private First Class 
             Delbert Littrell, United States Marine Corps.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HONORARY PROMOTION TO CORPORAL OF PRIVATE FIRST CLASS 
              DELBERT LITTRELL, UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS (RETIRED).

    (a) Honorary Promotion.--Notwithstanding any time limitation with 
respect to promotions for persons who served in the Armed Forces, the 
President is authorized to issue an honorary promotion promoting 
Private First Class Delbert Littrell, United States Marine Corps 
(retired), to the rank of corporal.
    (b) Additional Benefits Not To Accrue.--The honorary promotion of 
Delbert Littrell under subsection (a) shall not affect the retired pay 
or other benefits from the United States to which Delbert Littrell is 
entitled based upon his military service or affect any benefits to 
which any other person may become entitled based on his military 
service.
                                 <all>
```
#### IN the INTEREST OF: F.F.W., a Minor

483 EDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/26/2017

CP-51-DP-0001439-2014 (Philadelphia)

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF STEVENS INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES AS OF JUNE 30, 1997 AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             183
<SECURITIES>                                     1,360
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,521
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,496
<INVENTORY>                                     14,197
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,865
<PP&E>                                          39,679
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,061
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,325
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,356
<BONDS>                                             58
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           945
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,332
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,325
<SALES>                                         16,091
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,091
<CGS>                                           15,712
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,465
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   176
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,854
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,404)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,404)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.68)
        

</TABLE>