alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 45 (Friday, March 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10542-10543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5634]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Penn State University; Notice of Decision on Application for 
Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instrument

    This decision is made pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed 
between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th and

[[Page 10543]]

Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.
    Docket Number: 96-072R. Applicant: Penn State University, 
University Park, PA 16802. Instrument: Nano Indentor System, Model UMIS 
2001. Manufacturer: CISRO, Australia. Intended Use: See notice at 61 FR 
41773, August 12, 1996.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as it is intended to be used, was being manufactured in the 
United States at the time the instrument was ordered (September 21, 
1995). Reasons: The foreign instrument provides a spherical indentor to 
permit making stress/strain measurements.
    A domestic manufacturer of similar equipment advised on February 
11, 1997 that (1) this capability is pertinent to the applicant's 
intended purpose and (2) it knows of no domestic instrument or 
apparatus of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument for 
the applicant's intended use.
    We know of no other instrument or apparatus of equivalent 
scientific value to the foreign instrument which was being manufactured 
in the United States at the time the instrument was ordered.
Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 97-5634 Filed 3-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8434 

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to establish a Restaurant 

Reimbursement Program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2020 

Mr. RICE of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to establish a 

Restaurant Reimbursement Program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘America Dines Out 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RESTAURANT REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Treasury 

8 shall establish a Restaurant Reimbursement Program to 

9 make payments to restaurants in accordance with this secVerDate Sep 11 2014 20:34 Oct 24, 2020 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H8434.IH H8434

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8434 IH

1 tion for portions of a bill on which the restaurant provided 

2 a discount to a customer. 

3 (b) LIMITATIONS.—Payments may only be made 

4 under this section— 

5 (1) for 50 percent of the discount provided to 

6 a customer on food and non-alcoholic beverages, but 

7 in an amount not to exceed $12 per customer per 

8 day; 

9 (2) for discounts provided to customers on a 

10 Monday, Tuesday, or Wednesday during the 1- 

11 month period beginning two weeks after the date of 

12 enactment of this Act; and 

13 (3) for discounts provided to customers who 

14 were dining at the physical location of the res15 taurant. 

16 (c) APPLICATION.—A restaurant that seeks to receive 

17 a payment under this section shall submit an application 

18 to the Secretary of the Treasury in such form and manner, 

19 and containing such information, as the Secretary deter20 mines appropriate. 

21 (d) APPROPRIATION.—There is appropriated, out of 

22 amounts in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to 

23 the Secretary of the Treasury $3,400,000,000 to carry out 

24 this section. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF 18 U.S.C.
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Immune Response Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), which this written
statement accompanies, I, Michael K. Green, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of 18 U.S.C., as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated: November 12, 2004                             /s/ Michael K. Green
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Michael K. Green
                                                     Vice President, Finance and
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20

- 3389

_____________________________
B RETT A. H OLLOWAY , Appellant,

v.

R EBECCA D ENAE H OLLOWAY , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County

. J. Scott Duncan , Judge

. September 10, 2021

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. See Whitlock v. Veltkamp , 296 So. 3d 5 2 8, 530 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020).

L EWIS , M AKAR , and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jason Cromey, Pensacola
, for Appellant.

Rebecca Denae Holloway, pro se
, Appellee.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8561 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8561

 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to sunset the increased 
 FMAP for medical assistance for newly eligible mandatory individuals, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 9, 2020

 Mr. Johnson of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to sunset the increased 
 FMAP for medical assistance for newly eligible mandatory individuals, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Restoring Fairness to Medicaid 
Reimbursement Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. SUNSET OF INCREASED FMAP FOR MEDICAL ASSISTANCE FOR NEWLY 
              ELIGIBLE MANDATORY INDIVIDUALS.

    Section 1905(y)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 
(y)(1)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (D), by striking at the end ``and'';
            (2) in subparagraph (E), by striking ``and each year 
        thereafter.'' and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(F) the Federal medical assistance percentage 
                otherwise provided under subsection (b) for calendar 
                quarters in 2021 and each year thereafter.''.

SEC. 3. CONFORMING OF TITLE XIX OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT TO PROVIDE A 
              STATE OPTION TO PROVIDE MEDICAL ASSISTANCE TO EXPANSION 
              POPULATION.

    Section 1902(a)(10)(i)(VIII) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1396a(a)(10)(i)(VIII)) is amended by inserting ``at the option of the 
State'' after ``beginning January 1, 2014,''.
                                 <all>
```
p.1 

OAR Box 1413 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

101)11-1-102 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/9/2008 3:11:25 PM Sheet 101 of 114 
Industry & Financial Consulting Services 

Industry Norms & 

Key Business Ratios 

Desk-lbp Edition 1996-97 

I 

Over 800 Lines 

of Business 

SIC #0100-8999 

Dun&Bradstr 
Copyright©Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., 1997 

All rights reserved. Except for use in a review, the reproduction or use of this 

work in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or Other means, now known 

or hereafter invented, including xerography, photocopying, and recording, and 

in any infonnation storage and retrieval system is forbidden without the 

written permission of the publisher. 

To obtain reprint permission, please send your correspondence to: 

Dun & Bradstreet Infonnation Services 

Attn: Public Relations 

One Diamond Hill Road 

Murray HiU, NJ 07974 

Manufactured in the United States of America. 

ft v 

-&&'3j3wr«?5,< •
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 130 (Tuesday, July 8, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 36460]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-55505]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 165


Beverages

CFR Correction

    In title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations, parts 100 to 169, 
revised as of Apr. 1, 1997, on page 508, in Sec. 165.110, in the table 
in paragraph (b)(4)(i)(A) the entries for ``Sulfate'' and ``Endrin'' 
should be removed.

[FR Doc. 97-55505 Filed 7-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
#### IN the INTEREST OF: K.A.L., a Minor

1 EDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/22/2017

CP-51-AP-0000737-2016 (Philadelphia)

Affirmed
#### COM. v. BUCHANAN, J.

1901 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/11/2017

CP-23-CR-0004562-2015 (Delaware)

Affirmed
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8580 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8580

 To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate segments of the 
   Little Manatee River as a component of the Wild and Scenic Rivers 
                    System, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 13, 2020

 Mr. Buchanan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate segments of the 
   Little Manatee River as a component of the Wild and Scenic Rivers 
                    System, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Little Manatee Wild and Scenic River 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF WILD AND SCENIC RIVER SEGMENTS, LITTLE MANATEE 
              RIVER, FLORIDA.

    Section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(231) Little Manatee River, Florida.--
            ``(A) In general.--The approximately 50-mile segment 
        beginning at the source in southeastern Hillsborough County, 
        Florida, downstream to the point at which the river enters 
        Tampa Bay, including appropriate tributaries, to be 
        administered by the Secretary of the Interior as a scenic 
        river.
            ``(B) Set aside.--The designation under this paragraph 
        shall not include--
                    ``(i) those portions lying within Manatee County, 
                Florida, and being more particularly described as 
                Parcel ID 247800059, Parcel ID 248200008 and Parcel ID 
                248100000; and
                    ``(ii) South Fork.
            ``(C) Withdrawal.--Subject to valid existing rights, the 
        Federal land within the boundaries of the river segments 
        designated by subparagraph (A) is withdrawn from all forms of--
                    ``(i) entry, appropriation, or disposal under the 
                public land laws;
                    ``(ii) location, entry, and patent under the mining 
                laws; and
                    ``(iii) disposition under all laws relating to 
                mineral and geothermal leasing or mineral materials.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-10240.

#### Johnson *v.*Mississippi.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
June 24, 2015

Mr. Carson Wade Lee

President Turbine Aircraft Logistics, LLC

5715 Oak Hollow Lane Oviedo, FL 32765

Dear Mr. Lee:

This letter is to inform you that we are unabl e to process your request for an exemption from part 21(h); §§ 43.13, 45.29(f), 91.121, 61.56, 61.57, 91.155(b), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), 91.417 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CF R). It explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your April 13, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Turbine Aircraft Logistics, LLC into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-1150), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the reque st any further, you mu st send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adve rsely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equa l to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or ar guments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any fu rther, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requi res you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days , we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additiona l time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-10710 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

TRACY L BROWN Defendant - Appellant

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:92-CR-7-1-R

-------------------- May 28, 2002 Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Tracy L. Brown has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Brown has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief, but he has not filed a pro se brief of his own. Our review of the brief filed by counsel and of the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excusedNo. 00-30485 -2- from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 321

Expressing the sense of the Congress that money saved from efforts to

combat waste, fraud, and abuse in the Medicare Program should be

deposited in the Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund to ensure the

financial integrity of the Medicare Program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 5, 1998

Mr. SNOWBARGER (for himself, Mr. TALENT, Mr. HOSTETTLER, Mr. BURTON

of Indiana, and Mr. TIAHRT) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in

addition to the Committee on Commerce, for a period to be subsequently

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that money saved from

efforts to combat waste, fraud, and abuse in the Medicare Program should be deposited in the Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund to ensure the financial integrity of the Medicare Program.

Whereas it is estimated that, in fiscal year 1996, waste,

fraud, and abuse in the Medicare Program cost the program more than $23,000,000,000;

Whereas this money would otherwise be used to reimburse

costs for health care services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries;
2

•HCON 321 IH

Whereas the Congress has passed several Acts to combat

waste, fraud, and abuse in the Medicare Program;

Whereas proposals have been made to use any savings from

efforts to combat waste, fraud, and abuse in the Medicare Program not to preserve the financial integrity of

the program, but rather to expand eligibility for health

care services under the program to individuals between

the ages of 55 and 64;

Whereas expanding eligibility under the program before guaranteeing the financial integrity of the program is irresponsible and breaks faith with the millions of older

Americans who rely on the Medicare Program; and

Whereas in order to save money the Health Care Financing

Administration has limited certain medically necessary

benefits for Medicare beneficiaries who meet current eligibility requirements under the program: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that any

3 money recovered from efforts to combat waste, fraud, and

4 abuse in the Medicare Program should be deposited into

5 the Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund to ensure the

6 financial integrity of the Medicare Program and to secure

7 health care services for only those individuals who meet

8 current eligibility requirements under the program.

Æ
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JEREMY KIRKWOOD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2022-2880

[November 9, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Daliah H. Weiss, Judge; L.T. Case No. 21CF007822AMB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Robert Porter, Assistant Public 

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alexandra A. Folley, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Telestone  Technologies
Corporation  (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005
as filed  with the  Securities  Exchange  Commission  on the  date  hereof  (the
Report).  I, Han  Daqing,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


By: /s/ Han Daqing
-----------------------
Han Daqing
Chief Executive Officer
May 13, 2005
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6676

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DEWAYNE CORNELIUS MELVIN, a/k/a Baby Boy , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 5:08

- cr
- 00164

- D

- 1 )

Submitted : December 22, 2020 Decided: December 29, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Dewayne Cornelius Melvin , Appellant Pro Se

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Dewayne Cornelius Melvin appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion seeking a sentence reduction pursuant to the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No.
115

- 391, § 404, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222. We have reviewed the record and find that the court did not abuse its discretion in declining to redu ce Melvin’s sentence. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Melvin , No. 5:08

- cr
00164

- D

- 1 (E.D.N.C. May 7, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately prese nted in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
No. 11-10107.

#### Markovanovich *v.*Smith, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.