alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130312 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130312 COA: 262395 Wayne CC: 99-002640 WILLIAM DOUGLAS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to a ppeal the December 6, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s0619 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2006

Clerk
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 12.1
 
                 KENT ELECTRONICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
        STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 
                     (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIO)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                         THIRTEEN WEEKS
                                       FISCAL YEARS ENDED                     ENDED
                         ---------------------------------------------- -----------------
                         APRIL 3, APRIL 2, APRIL 1, MARCH 30, MARCH 29, JUNE 29, JUNE 28,
                           1993     1994     1995     1996     1997(1)    1996     1997
                         -------- -------- -------- --------- --------- -------- --------
<S>                      <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>       <C>       <C>      <C>
Earnings before income
 taxes.................. $12,632  $15,902  $23,511   $49,095   $45,100  $15,556  $14,497
Add fixed charges.......     719      783    1,085     1,857     2,363      568      329
                         -------  -------  -------   -------   -------  -------  -------
Earnings as adjusted.... $13,351  $16,685  $24,596   $50,952   $47,463  $16,124  $14,826
                         =======  =======  =======   =======   =======  =======  =======
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense...... $    79  $   156  $   340   $   898   $ 1,192  $   304  $     7
  Interest portion of
   rental expense(2)....     640      627      745       959     1,171      264      322
                         -------  -------  -------   -------   -------  -------  -------
Total fixed charges..... $   719  $   783  $ 1,085   $ 1,857   $ 2,363  $   568  $   329
                         =======  =======  =======   =======   =======  =======  =======
Ratio of earnings to
 fixed charges..........   18.6x    21.3x    22.7x     27.4x     20.1x    28.4x    45.1x
                         =======  =======  =======   =======   =======  =======  =======
</TABLE>
--------
(1) Includes non-recurring merger and integration charges of $5.5 million,
    pre-tax, in fiscal year ended March 29, 1997. Exclusive of such charges,
    the ratio of earnings to fixed charges for fiscal year ended March 29,
    1997 was 22.4x.
(2) The interest factor of rental expense is estimated at one-third of total
    rental expense, which the Company believes to be a reasonable
    approximation.
# C_2021329EN.01004201.xml

| 16.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/42

---

Action brought on 2 July 2021 — Leinfelder Uhren München v EUIPO — Schafft (Representation of a geometric figure)

(Case T-375/21)

(2021/C 329/56)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Leinfelder Uhren München GmbH & Co. KG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: S. Lüft, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Thomas Schafft (Munich)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark (Representation of a geometric figure) — EU trade mark No 13 975 453

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 March 2021 in Joined Cases R 1931/2018-2 and R 1936/2018-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in so far as it declares the applicant’s rights in the contested EU trade mark No 13 975 453 to be revoked also in respect of the goods in Class 14 (wristwatches) and Class 18 (watch straps); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in so far as it declares the applicant’s rights in the contested EU trade mark No 13 975 453 to be revoked also in respect of the goods in Class 14 (wristwatches) and Class 18 (watch straps);

| — | dismiss appeal R 1931/2018-2 brought by the cancellation applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

dismiss appeal R 1931/2018-2 brought by the cancellation applicant;

| — | order EUIPO to pay costs; |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay costs;

| — | in the event that the other party appears as intervener in the proceedings, order him to bear his own costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

in the event that the other party appears as intervener in the proceedings, order him to bear his own costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8765 

To codify the Industry-Recognized Apprenticeship Programs of the 

Department of Labor. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2020 

Mr. LUETKEMEYER (for himself, Mr. LONG, Mr. FULCHER, and Mr. BANKS) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To codify the Industry-Recognized Apprenticeship Programs 

of the Department of Labor. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Modernizing America’s 

5 Apprenticeship Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INDUSTRY-RECOGNIZED APPRENTICESHIP PRO7 GRAMS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. 

8 The provisions of part 29 of title 29, Code of Federal 

9 Regulations, as amended by the final regulations entitled 

10 ‘‘Apprenticeship Programs, Labor Standards for RegistraVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:49 Nov 28, 2020 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H8765.IH H8765

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8765 IH

1 tion, Amendment of Regulations’’ published by the De2 partment of Education in the Federal Register on March 

3 11, 2020 (85 Fed. Reg. 14294 et seq.), and as in effect 

4 on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, shall 

5 have the force and effect of enacted law. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### IN the INTEREST OF: I.N.S., a Minor

510 EDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/21/2017

CP-51-AP-000111-2016, CP-51-DP-0002471-2014 (Philadelphia)

Affirmed
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: N.M., A MINOR

PETITION OF: N.M., A MINOR

:

:

:

:

:

No. 749 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of April, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                       EXHIBIT 5



                                 August 6, 1997



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

    Re:   PMT Services, Inc.
          Registration Statement on Form S-8

Ladies and Gentlemen:

    We are acting as counsel to PMT Services, Inc., a Tennessee corporation (the
"Company"), in connection with the registration under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended (the "Act"), of an aggregate of 1,500,000 shares of the
Company's Common Stock, $.01 par value per share (the "Shares"), pursuant to a
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (the "Registration Statement").  We have
examined the Company's Amended and Restated Charter, as amended to date, its
Bylaws as amended to date, the record of proceedings of its shareholders and
directors, and the Registration Statement.  We have also examined and relied
upon such other records, documents and instruments as in our judgment are
necessary or appropriate in order to express the opinions hereinafter set forth.

    Based upon the foregoing, we are of the opinion that the Shares, when issued
and delivered in the manner and on the terms described in the 1994 Incentive
Stock Plan, as amended, will be duly and validly issued, fully paid and non-
assessable.

    We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement.


                              Very truly yours,

                              /s/ Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis,
                              A Professional Limited Liability Company
EXHIBIT 32

Certification of Chief Executive Officer  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Alliance Imaging, Inc.
(the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:



|Dated: November 14, 2003 |  | /s/PAUL S. VIVIANOPaul S. Viviano President and Chief Executive Officer
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

---

Certification of Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Alliance Imaging, Inc.
(the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:



|Dated: November 14, 2003 |  | /s/KENNETH S. ORDKenneth S. Ord Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         808,126
<SECURITIES>                                11,738,650
<RECEIVABLES>                                  122,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,332,615
<PP&E>                                       7,611,538
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,294,237
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,649,916
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,233,544
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       121,017
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,295,355
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,649,916
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,102,500
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,630,084)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,630,084)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,630,084)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           4,190
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,190
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,190
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,149
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       507,603
<OTHER-SE>                                   (506,562)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,190
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,703
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,703)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,703)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
No. 10-10642.

#### Johnson *v.*Illinois.

App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

________________________

No. ACM S32401

________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Jason M. CECALA

Airman First Class (E-3), U.S. Air Force, Appellant

________________________

Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary

Decided 28 July 2017

________________________

Military Judge: James R. Dorman.

Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge and confinement for 6

months. Sentence adjudged 9 March 2016 by SpCM convened at 

Whiteman Air Force Base, Missouri.

For Appellant: Major Jarett F. Merk, USAF.

For Appellee: Major Meredith L. Steer, USAF; Gerald R. Bruce, Esquire.

Before MAYBERRY, HARDING, and BROWN, Appellate Military 

Judges.

________________________

This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as 

precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4.

________________________

PER CURIAM:

The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no 

error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 

866(c). 
United States v. Cecala, No. ACM S32401

2

Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT

KURT J. BRUBAKER

Clerk of the Court
Comments on EPA's PGP Working Draft 011310

Don Carlson 

to: 

Jack Faulk 

01/22/2010 05:37 PM 

Show Details 

Jack:

Attached are comments of the draft PGP. I sent them as both a pdf and MS Word attachment. If you have 

problems opening the attached pdf or MS Word files, give me a call. I will put a hard copy in the mail to you on 

Monday.

Donald R. Carlson, PE

Kansas Department of Health and Environment

Bureau of Water - Industrial Programs Section

1000 SW Jackson, Suite 420

Topeka, Kansas 66612-1367

(785) 296-5547

(785) 296-0086 Fax

 

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\jfaulk\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web3478.htm 5/11/2010
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________

No. 01-40706

(Summary Calendar)

_________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOSE LOPEZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:00-CR-39-3

July 8, 2002

Before JONES, SMITH and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Jose Lopez has requested leave to withdraw as counsel and has

filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Lopez has not filed a

response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.
-2-

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, and counsel is excused from

further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Amador LIMON, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-50501 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed March 2, 2018

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Amador Limón, Pro Se

Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Amador Limón has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Limón has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 851 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 851

   To reinstate requirements pertaining to electronically controlled 
 pneumatic brake systems on high-hazard flammable unit trains, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 29, 2019

 Ms. Herrera Beutler introduced the following bill; which was referred 
         to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To reinstate requirements pertaining to electronically controlled 
 pneumatic brake systems on high-hazard flammable unit trains, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Oil and Flammable Material Rail 
Transportation Safety Act''.

SEC. 2. REINSTATEMENT OF REQUIREMENTS.

    On and after the date that is 90 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act--
            (1) the final rule of the Department of Transportation 
        dated September 25, 2018, and titled ``Hazardous Materials: 
        Removal of Electronically Controlled Pneumatic Brake System 
        Requirements for High Hazard Flammable Unit Trains'' (83 Fed. 
        Reg. 48393) shall have no force and effect; and
            (2) each regulation removed or otherwise amended by such 
        final rule shall be restored and revived as if such final rule 
        had not been issued.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.6

[RYDER SCOTT COMPANY LETTERHEAD]

                      Consent of Ryder Scott Company, L.P.

     As independent oil and gas consultants, Ryder Scott Company, L.P. hereby
consents to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on
Form S-4, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about
February 12, 2003, of information from our reserve reports for Plains
Exploration and Production Company and Affiliates as of December 31, 2001,
December 31, 2000 and December 31, 1999. We further consent to references to our
firm under the subsection Experts and in the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated
February 2, 2003 in regards to reserve reporting as of December 31, 2002.


                                        /s/ Ryder Scott Company, L.P.
                                        ---------------------------------
                                        RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.

Houston, Texas
February 12, 2003