CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

-- Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: San Diego County Air Pollution Control District

Rule No(s): 67.4 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: 11 / 9 / 20 1 1

Rule Title(s): METAL CONTAINER, METAL CLOSURE AND META L COIL COATING OPERATIONS

Date Submitted to ARB: 11 / 29 / 1 1

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): 5/15/96

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Rob Reider Phone Number: 858

- 586

- 2640 E

- mail Address: Robert.Reider@sdcounty.ca.gov

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

Rule 67.4 regulat e s emissions of volatile organic compounds from metal container, metal closure and metal coil

coating operations. The proposed amendments will reduce the VOC content limit for cleaning materials to 25

grams / liter unless some specified cleaning and emission control equipment is used, include a new section to

require the use of high transfer efficiency coating application equipment, clarify record keeping requirements a nd

update existing definitions of terms used in the rule. In addition, the amended rule will update the test methods

for determining VOC and exempt compounds contents of coatings, cleaning materials and the overall efficiency of

emission control systems.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name): misc

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complet e this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach reference(s) for emission

factor(s) and other information. Attach calculation sheet showing how the emission information provided below was det ermined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category: N/A

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in E missions: 20 10 Area Affected: San Diego County

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) :

N/A . The two affected sources are presently using coatings and clean ing solvents complying with the amended rule.CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

-- Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): N/A

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): N/A

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

Dist rict is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: 2

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100 %

Number of Large ( > 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: none Percent in Nonattainment Area: n/a %

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large ( > 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : n/a

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) ( d ) (1)

, (d)(3), (e) of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Reductions are: Specified c oating application equipment and methods

for cleaning of such equipment.

.

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): ( d ) (1) ,(e) Work Practice Standards in Section(s): (d)( 2 ),(d)( 3 )

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): (f) Reporting Requirements in Section(s): n/aCALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

-- Page 3

(Electronic Format)

5/1/2002 3

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: