alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dale D. MARTIN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-12396 Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(January 29, 2018)

Lindsay Feinberg, U.S. Attorney Service — Middle District of Georgia, U.S. At*683torney’s Office, Macon, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Jonathan Dodson, Christina Lee Hunt, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Macon, GA, for Defendant-Appellant

Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Dale Martin appeals the condition on his supervised release that he must work at least 30 hours each week.

However, in his plea agreement, Martin waived his right to appeal sentencing issues, except for the right to appeal a sentence that exceeds the advisory guidelines range. The District Court questioned Martin under oath and concluded that he knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal. We agree with that determination. *See United States v. Grinard-Henry,*399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2006) (holding that “[a]n appeal waiver includes the waiver of the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or even blatant error”); *United States v. Bushert,*997 F.2d 1343, 1360-61 (11th Cir. 1993) (holding that a sentence waiver is enforceable if it was made knowingly and voluntarily). The District Court sentenced Martin to the advisory guideline range, which rendered inapplicable the exception to his appeal waiver. Therefore, the appeal waiver bars the present appeal. *See United States v. Zinn,*321 F.3d 1084, 1088 (11th Cir 2003) (noting that “the conditions of supervised release are a part” of a sentence).

Accordingly, the Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in the Appellant’s plea agreement is

GRANTED.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-17-0000511

21-JUN-2019

07:49 AM
**EXHIBIT
      32**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Air Methods Corporation (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.






/s/
                Aaron D. ToddAaron
                D. ToddChief
                Executive OfficerNovember
                9, 2007/s/
                Trent J. CarmanTrent
                J. CarmanChief
                Financial OfficerNovember
                9, 2007








A  signed  original  of  this
      written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided  to  Air  Methods  Corporation  and
      will be retained by Air Methods and furnished  to  the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juver Alexander DIAZ-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40495 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed January 5, 2018

Katherine Lisa Haden, Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Georgette P. Oden, Crawford & Cruz, Austin, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Juver Alexander Diaz-Martinez appeals the 24-month sentence imposed for his illegal reentry conviction. He contends that the assessment of criminal history points for a prior conviction that also serves as the basis for an increase in the offense level violates the Double Jeopardy Clause by unconstitutionally punishing him twice for the same offense.

We review de novo the district court’s interpretation and application of the Sentencing Guidelines. *United States v. Dison,*573 F.3d 204, 207 (5th Cir. 2009). Double-counting does not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause so long as the Guidelines do not expressly forbid the double-counting. *Id.*at 208. The applicable guidelines provisions in this case expressly provide for double-counting of a defendant’s prior conviction in enhancing his offense level and assessing his. criminal history score. *See*U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2, cmt. (n.3). Accordingly, the district court did not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Brett KIMBERLIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patrick FREY, Defendant-Appellee, and National Bloggers Club; Ali Akbar; Erick Erickson; Michelle Malkin; Glenn Beck; Aaron Walker; William Hoge; Lee Stranahan; Robert Stacy Mccain; James O’Keefe; Mandy Nagy; Breitbart.com; The Franklin Center; Simon and Schuster, Inc.; Lynn Thomas, a/k/a Kimberlinunmasked; Mercury Radio Arts; The Blaze; Ace of Spades; Redstate; Db Capital Strategies; Dan Backer; Twitchy; American Spectator, Defendants.

No. 17-1970

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 27, 2018

Decided: March 14, 2018

Brett C. Kimberlin, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald David Coleman, MANDELBAUM SALSBURG, Roseland, New Jersey, for Appellee.

■Before WILKINSON and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Brett C. Kimberlin appeals the district court’s order granting Appellee summary *292judgment on Kimberlin’s First Amendment retaliation claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find mo reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Kimberlin v. Frey,*No. 8:13-cv-03059-GJH, 2017 WL 3141909 (D. Md. filed July 21, 2017; entered July 24, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
AVS

Quality Management

System

Title: Domestic Change Worksheet

QPM#

AIR-ANM-030-F4

Date: December 17. 2008

Revision

1

Record of Contacts

FDMS Docket No_ FAA-Wltt/I/- //60

_______________ z_&•••a"._ ••••••.•••__ ••• ••••••••••••• ,"'& _ ••••••• !2Z__

With whom outside the FAA has this proIXJsal been discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization Person Contacted Date

ATA Joe White June. 2010

Boeing Todd Essdslyn Jan. Feb & Aug, 2009

Bueing E,'/;'retl Groat Feb & March. 2009

Boeing Mike Siegehni1n Mnrch.2009

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED

Check the Master List to Verify That This is the COffed Revision Before Use
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 42 (Tuesday, March 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 9812]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5248]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993; Ole for Process Control (OPC) Foundation

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 18, 1996, pursuant to 
Sec. 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Ole for Process 
Control Foundation (``OPC'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, the identities of the new members are as 
follows: ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd., Zurich, SWITZERLAND; Applicorn 
International S.A., Caudebec Les Elbeuf, FRANCE; Biles & Associates, 
Houston, TX; Canary Labs, Inc., Martinsburg, PA; Ci Technologies Pty 
Limited, Pymble, NSW, AUSTRALIA; Dynapro Systems, Inc., New 
Westminster, BC, CANADA; Hardy Software Systems, Inc., Houston, TX; 
Honeywell, Inc., Phoenix, AZ; ICONICS, INC., Foxborough, MA; Institut 
fur Automation und Kommunikation e. V. Magdeburg, Barleben, GERMANY; 
Johnson Yokogawa Corporation, Newnan, GA; National Instruments, Austin, 
TX; OMNX Control Systems, Charleston, TN; PID, Phoenix, AZ; Process 
Automation Systems, Inc., Vancouver, BC, CANADA; ProMicro Ltd., London, 
ENGLAND; RDI Software Technologies, Inc., Des Plaines, IL; Roy-G-Biv 
Corporation, Seattle, WA; S-S Technologies, Inc., Kitchener, ON, 
CANADA; Siemens AG, AUT 1E Nuremberg, GERMANY; SoftPLC Corporation, 
Humble, TX; Star Enterprise, Houston, TX; TA Engineering Co., Inc., 
Moraga, CA; The Foxboro Company, Foxboro, MA; The Software Studio, 
Inc., Cupertino, CA; Toshiba Corporation, Tokyo, JAPAN; Trebing & 
Himstedt Prozessautomation GmbH & Co. KG, Schwerin, GERMANY; and 
Wonderware Corporation, Irvine, CA. One member, Rockwell Software, 
Inc., has moved from Milwaukee, WI to West Allis, WI.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of OPC. Membership in this venture remains open and OPC 
intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all 
membership changes.
    On July 15, 1996, the Ole for Process Control Foundation (``OPC''), 
filed its original notification pursuant to Sec. 6(b) of the Act. The 
Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register 
pursuant to Sec. 6(b) of the Act on August 14, 1996 (61 Fed. Reg. 
42269).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 97-5248 Filed 3-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
(logo) BERKADIA®

 

 

Annual Statement as toCompliance

For the Year Ended December31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”)

 

*Deutsche Mortgage &Asset Receiving Corporation,*

*Series 2015-DC1*

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 ofthe Pooling and Servicing Agreement governing the referenced transaction (the“Servicing Agreement”), I hereby attest that:

 

i. A review of the activitiesand performance of Berkadia as Subservicer during the Reporting Period has beenmade under my supervision.

 

ii. To the best of my knowledge,based on such review, Berkadia as Subservicer has fulfilled, in all materialrespects, its obligations under this Subservicing Agreement throughout theReporting Period and no default by the Subservicer under the SubservicingAgreement has occurred and is continuing.

 

Berkadia,

 

/s/ Mark E. McCool

Mark E. McCool

President

February 10, 2017
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**Certification
      Pursuant to**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**as
      Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Telestone Technologies Corporation
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Liu Dongping,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated: August
      14, 2008




By:
            /s/
                Liu DongpingName:
            Liu
                DongpingTitle:
            Chief
                Financial Officer (Principal Financial
                Officer)
EXHIBIT 11.1

<TABLE>

                 STEVENS INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
              COMPUTATIONS OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
                                 (Unaudited)
                (Amounts in thousands, except per share data)



                                       Three Months Ended  Nine Months Ended
                                           September 30,       September 30,
                                          2001      2000     2001      2000
                                          -----    ------    -----    ------
 <S>                                     <C>      <C>       <C>      <C>
 Basic and diluted:

 Weighted average shares outstanding
   - basic                                9,502     9,502    9,502     9,502
 Assumed exercise of Series A and B
  stock options (Treasury stock method)       -         -        -         -

 Assumed exercise of $1.1 million of
  10% convertible subordinated notes
  at $0.50 per share - anti-dilutive          -         -        -         -
                                          -----    ------    -----    ------
 Total common share equivalents
   - diluted                              9,502     9,502    9,502     9,502
                                          =====    ======    =====    ======
  Net income (loss)                      $ (358)  $ (364)  $(1,328)  $(4,018)
                                          =====    ======    =====    ======
 Earnings (loss) per share
   - basic (Note 8)                      $(0.04)  $ (0.04)  $(0.14)  $ (0.42)
                                          =====    ======    =====    ======
 Earnings (loss) per share
  - diluted (Note 8):                    $(0.04)  $ (0.04)  $(0.14)  $ (0.42)
                                          =====    ======    =====    ======

     See notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,785
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,510,180
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  436,175
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    20
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (436,195)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (436,195)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (436,195)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.09)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


Press Release

DYNEGY REPORTS S.E.C. DEVELOPMENT

     HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--May 8, 2002--Dynegy Inc. (NYSE:DYN)
today reported that it has been advised by the Staff of the Securities and
Exchange Commission that they intend to request a formal order of investigation
in connection with the previously announced inquiry into the natural gas
transaction called "Project Alpha."

     The company said it intends to continue to cooperate fully with the SEC in
resolving this issue.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CHILDREN'S COMPREHENSIVE SERVICES, INC. FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          20,245
<SECURITIES>                                     1,974
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,247
<ALLOWANCES>                                        77
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,171
<PP&E>                                          20,526
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,605
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,390
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,253
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            71
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,676
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,390
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,359
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,779
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 225
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,082
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (596)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,678
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    448
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,230
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .60
        

</TABLE>
# Early Learning

- Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona Stresses Importance of Kindergarten in Early Childhood Education Remarks Thank you.  I’m pleased to be here at Beyer Early  Childhood Center in Rockford, Illinois, with Representative Eric Sorensen and National  Education Association President Becky Pringle to visit an incredible early  learning program here and talk about why we believe early childhood is so  critical to raising the bar for education in this country.
- Secretary Cardona Holds Virtual Roundtable with Early Childhood Stakeholders to Discuss Priorities for Early Learning Today, U.S. Education Secretary Miguel Cardona held a virtual roundtable conversation with a diverse group of early childhood stakeholders and leaders who bring perspective from the experiences of early educators, families, and communities during the public health emergency.
SCWC

- 20

- 0000 728

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ‘ I

________________________________________________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF LC, AC, IC, AND DG

________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP

- 20

- 0000 728 ; FC

- S NO S

. 20

- 1

- 0022, 20

- 1

- 0023,

20

- 1

- 0024 and 20

- 1

- 0025 )
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Petitioner / Appellant Mother ’ s application for writ of

certiorari filed on January 1 3 , 202 2 , is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ‘ i, March 7, 202 2.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
/s/ Todd W. Eddins Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-20-0000728 07-MAR-2022 07:52 AM Dkt. 15 ODAC
# Academic Achievement

- Raise the Bar: Lead the World "Raise the Bar: Lead the World" is the U.S. Department of Education's call to action to transform P-12 education and unite around what truly works—based on decades of experience and research—to advance educational equity and excellence.
- FACT SHEET: Biden-Harris Administration Announces New Actions to Build on Work to Accelerate Learning and Improve Student Achievement When President Biden took office, fewer than half of K-12 schools were fully open for in-person learning. Today, thanks to the President's swift actions and historic investments, every school in America is open safely for in-person instruction.
- Raise the Bar: Create Pathways for Global Engagement Goal: Ensure every student has a path   to postsecondary education and training, including by establishing and scaling innovative systems of college and career pathways that integrate high schools, colleges, careers, and communities and lead to students earning industry-recognized credentials and securing in-demand jobs.The Problem
- Raise the Bar: Boldly Improve Learning Conditions Goal: Eliminate the educator shortage for every school by ensuring that schools are appropriately staffed, paying educators competitively, and strengthening pathways into the profession.
- U.S. Department of Education Announces $182 Million in Education Innovation and Research Grants to Improve Academic Achievement for Underserved Students U.S.