alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-4.66



 Exhibit 4.66 

Second Supplementary Agreement to the 

Web Layout Copyright License Agreement 

This second supplementary agreement to the web layout copyright license agreement (this “Supplementary Agreement”) is entered
into in Beijing on August 15, 2013 by and between: 
 Licensor: Baidu Online Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. 

Address: 3/F, Baidu Campus, No.10, Shangdi 10th Street, Haidian District, Beijing (“Party
A”) 
 Licensee: Beijing Perusal Technology Co., Ltd. 

Address: No. 402, No. 18 Danling Street, Haidian District, Beijing (“Party B”) 

(Collectively, the “Parties”) 
 WHEREAS,

  

	1.	Licensor and Licensee have made a certain Web Layout Copyright License Agreement (the “Original Agreement”). Through friendly negotiation, the Parties amend the Original Agreement on August 15,
2013 with respect to the following: 

  

	 	(a)	Amend Section 6.1 to: this Agreement shall be executed and effective at the same time at the date first written above. Unless otherwise expressly stated in the Agreement, this Agreement shall be valid permanently.


  

	 	(b)	Delete Section 6.2. 

  

	 	(c)	The Parties agree and confirm: this Supplementary Agreement is an integral part of the Original Agreement. In the event of any discrepancy between this Supplementary Agreement and the Original Agreement, this
Supplementary Agreement shall prevail. For the parts not stated in this Supplementary Agreement shall be in accordance with the Original Agreement. 

  

	2	This Supplementary Agreement shall be effective upon execution by both Parties. 

  

	3	This Supplementary Agreement shall be executed in two originals, with each party holding one original. Each original has the same legal effect. 


[Signature page follows] 







 Licensor: Baidu Online Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. 

/s/ Baidu Online Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. 

Licensee: Beijing Perusal Technology Co., Ltd. 
 /s/
Beijing Perusal Technology Co., Ltd. 

  
 2
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mayors Jewelers, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended September
27, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Thomas A. Andruskevich, Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 7, 2003                                      
|                                                            
|/s/ Thomas A. Andruskevich                                  
|                                                            
|Thomas A. Andruskevich                                      
|Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer

20
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER JACKSON CARTER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 178 MM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of January, 2019, the Petition for Leave to File Petition 

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-20687

Conference Calendar

 

SONIA MARIE MCMORRIS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

PHILIP MICHAEL THOMAS,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-01-MC-173

--------------------

April 11, 2002

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Sonia Marie McMorris appeals the district court’s denial of

her motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). The denial of

IFP is an appealable final decision. Flowers v. Turbine Support

Div., 507 F.2d 1242, 1244 (5th Cir. 1975). However, McMorris has

abandoned the issue by failing to brief it on appeal, having

devoted her appellate brief to the merits of her lawsuit, which

have not yet been addressed in the district court. See Yohey v.
No. 01-20687

-2-

Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Even if it is

assumed that McMorris has sufficiently preserved the issue for

appeal, her district-court IFP motion demonstrates that she had

ample funds with which to pay the filing fee, as the district

court determined.

The instant appeal is wholly without arguable merit, is

frivolous, and is therefore DISMISSED. See Howard v. King, 707

F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. McMorris is

CAUTIONED that any future frivolous filings will result in the

imposition of sanctions. The motion to supplement the record on

appeal is DENIED. 

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION DENIED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
**EXHIBIT
      32**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Air Methods Corporation (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:




(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.






/s/
                Aaron D. ToddAaron
                D. ToddChief
                Executive OfficerAugust
                9, 2007/s/
                Trent J. CarmanTrent
                J. CarmanChief
                Financial OfficerAugust
                9, 2007








A  signed  original  of  this
      written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided  to  Air  Methods  Corporation  and
      will be retained by Air Methods and furnished  to  the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7504

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TERRY KERMIT JOHNSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:98-cr-00289-6; 5:03-cv-00049) Submitted: November 17, 2006 Decided: December 19, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terry Kermit Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Terry Kermit Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Johnson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, dismiss the appeal, and deny Johnson’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
No. 11-1511.

#### Lawrence et ux. *v.*Bank of America et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8611 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8611

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 4755 Southeast Dixie Highway in Port Salerno, Florida, as the 
                ``Joseph Bullock Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOSEPH BULLOCK POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4755 Southeast Dixie Highway in Port Salerno, Florida, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Joseph Bullock Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Joseph 
Bullock Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 10, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 8611

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 4755 Southeast Dixie Highway in Port Salerno, Florida, as the 
                ``Joseph Bullock Post Office Building''.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4

                       Consent of Independent Accountants

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Amendment No. 1
to Registration Statement on Form S-4 of our report dated September 7, 2001
relating to the combined financial statements of the Gas Compression Business of
Schlumberger Limited, which appears in the Current Report on Form 8-K/A of
Hanover Compressor Company dated November 9, 2001. We also consent to the
reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Registration Statement.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas

May 24, 2002
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ADALBERTO RIVERA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 15-50214

D.C. No. 3:10-cr-05135-LAB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 24, 2016** 

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges. 

Adalberto Rivera appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges

the 12-month custodial sentence and 18-month term of supervised release imposed

upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291, and we affirm. 

FILED

FEB 29 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Rivera contends that the custodial portion of his sentence is substantively

unreasonable because the district court already accounted for the alleged cause of

his violations—his drug addiction—by imposing drug treatment as a condition of

supervised release. He further contends that the term of supervised release is

substantively unreasonable in light of the district court’s belief that he is not

amenable to supervision. The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing

Rivera’s sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The withinGuidelines custodial term and 18-month term of supervised release are

substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) factors and the totality

of the circumstances, including the need to deter Rivera from future violations. 

See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51. Moreover, contrary to Rivera’s contention, the record

reflects that the district court imposed the additional term of supervision in order to

provide him with rehabilitative services that he requested, not to punish him. See

United States v. Hurt, 345 F.3d 1033, 1036 (9th Cir. 2003) (“A violation of the

conditions of supervised release does not obviate the need for further supervision,

but rather confirms the judgment that supervision was necessary.”).

AFFIRMED.

2 15-50214
# Teacher and School Leader Incentive Program

- U.S. Department of Education Awards Nearly $115 Million to Help Increase Educator Compensation and Promote Educator Diversity The U.S. Department of Education today announced new  awards totaling nearly $115 million to support 29 Teacher and School Leader (TSL) Incentive projects, bolstering the Department's commitment to  ensuring a well-prepared, diverse, and sustainable educator workforce.
- U.S. Department of Education Announces Grant Opportunities to Address Educator Recruitment, Retention, and Career Advancement Today,  the U.S.
No. 11-10179.

#### Daniels *v.*Gonzalez, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund III, Ltd. at June 30, 1998, and its statement of income
for the six months then ended and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the Form 10Q of CNL Income Fund III, ltd. for the six months ended June 30,
1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,512,898
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  250,591
<ALLOWANCES>                                   176,452
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      14,694,281
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,749,281
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,250,632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,404,883
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,250,632
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               921,567
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  279,352
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,271,494
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,271,494
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,271,494
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Due to the nature of its industry, CNL Income Fund III, Ltd. has an
unclassified balance sheet; therefore, no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>
        



</TABLE>
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: "Griffin, J Daniel (Dan)" <JDGriffin@rrienergy.com>

Date: 7/20/2010 9:05 AM

Subject: Re: 

Attachments: pic00704.jpg

Greetings,

EPA has reviewed your extension request for the steam electric effluent

guidelines questionnaire for the RRI Energy's Cheswick Generation

Station. The deadline for your plant to submit Version 1 or Version 2

of the completed questionnaire is extended to October 15, 2010. Please

note that the deadline for Part G, if applicable, is unchanged and

remains 120 days after receipt of the questionnaire. No extensions are

granted for Versions 3 or 4 of the questionnaire; the deadline for

plants receiving these questionnaires remains 90 days after receipt.

If you need assistance during the completion of the steam electric

questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at

steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560.

Sincerely,

(Embedded image moved to file: pic00704.jpg)

 

 From: "Griffin, J Daniel (Dan)" <JDGriffin@rrienergy.com> 

 To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

 Cc: "Ethridge Jr., Benjamin" <BEthridge@rrienergy.com>, "Baldi, Sara Marie" 

<SMBaldi@rrienergy.com>

 

 Date: 06/23/2010 12:24 PM 

 Subject: 

Dear Ms. AliceaPlease find attached a letter from Benjamin Ethridge, General Manager of

RRI Energy's Cheswick Generation Station.

Sincerely,

J. Daniel Griffin

724-275-1501 Office

724-323-4624 Cell[attachment "Steam Electric ELG Questionaire.pdf"

deleted by Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER
ended March 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               3,159
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        2,454
<ALLOWANCES>                                          (89)
<INVENTORY>                                          4,921
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    10,982
<PP&E>                                               4,315
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (1,676)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      13,708
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                2,813
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               116
<OTHER-SE>                                           8,992
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        13,708
<SALES>                                              4,372
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     4,372
<CGS>                                                2,477
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        2,477
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       409
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      54
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1,432
<INCOME-TAX>                                            36
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  1,396
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         1,396
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.09



</TABLE>
No. 11-9120.

#### Jonathon C. B., a Minor *v.*Illinois.

Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       Independent Accountant's Consent

The Board of Directors
Nuevo Energy Company:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement 
(No. 333-XXXXX) on Form S-3 of Nuevo Energy Company of our report dated February
16, 1996, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Nuevo Energy Company as
of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the related consolidated statements of 
operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 1995, which report appears in the 
December 31, 1995 annual report on Form 10-K of Nuevo Energy Company, and of our
reports dated December 20, 1995, relating to the statements of revenues and 
direct operating expenses of the Point Pedernales Properties for each of the 
years in the three-year period ended June 30, 1995, and dated February 12, 1996,
relating to the statements of revenues and direct operating expenses of the 
Unocal Properties for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 
1995, which reports appear in the Form 8-K dated April 9, 1996, and to the 
reference to our firm under the heading "Experts" in the prospectus.

Houston, Texas
November 14, 1996