alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S.-Japan High-Speed Rail 

1212 New York Ave., NW, Suite 700 

Washington, DC 20005 

http://www.usjhsr.com/ 

Videos of Gangway of High-Speed Fixed Consist Trainsets 

1. Train traveling at high speed (Highspeed.wmv: 0:35) 

In this video, the train is moving at a high speed of 240 km/h (150 mph). The split screen to the 

right of the video shows the view from the driver’s cab. One sees images of the tracks and 

catenaries in front of the train as the train moves forward. We see a passenger in a wheelchair 

moving in between cars. He moves away from the screen and into the other car. There is 

minimal discernible lateral movement as the passenger moves through the gangway. At all times, 

the passageway meets current ADA dimensional requirements. As he moves into the other car, 

the door automatically opens. The last part of the video shows him moving back from the other 

car towards the viewer. 

2. Train operation through a turnout (Turnout.wmv; 0:28) 

In this video, the train travels through the tightest turnout on the main line of Japan’s Tokaido 

Shinkansen. The train is traveling at around 43 mph through a No. 18 turnout with a curve 

radius of 1100 meters (1309 feet). The wheelchair is set on the plates in between cars. We see 

little lateral motion around the wheelchair. At all times, the passageway meets current ADA 

dimensional requirements. The right-hand split screen shows the train traveling on the alignment. 

3. Main line operation (Main line.wmv; 2:00) 

This video features the train traveling through different curve radii. The first part of the video 

shows the train traveling at the maximum operating speed of 77 mph through a 600-meter (1969-

foot) curve radius. During this time, the wheelchair is set in the gangway connecting the two 

cars to show how stable the train is while moving through a curve. At all times, the passageway 

meets current ADA dimensional requirements. The last part of the video shows the train 

traveling through a tight curve of 400-meter (1312-foot) curve radius, which would typically 

have a maximum operating speed of 63 mph. A passenger in a wheelchair moves easily from 

one car to another. He stops briefly on the connecting plates to show how little lateral or vertical 

movement there is even though the train is moving through a tight curve. This is the sharpest 

curve in commercial operation of the Tokaido Shinkansen in Japan, which is tighter than planned 

for the U.S. operation. The video highlights minimized inter-car motion during tight curve 

negotiations.
#### CRUICKSHANK-WALLACE, B. v. CNA FINANCIAL CORP.

2403 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/25/2017

Reargument Denied 11/22/2017

No. 2013-10242

(Chester)

Affirmed
September 10, 2015

Mr. Raul Granda

President

Eye Above Miami, Corp.

3352 NE 11th Drive

Homestead, FL 33033

Dear Mr. Granda:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

part 21, subpart H, and §§ 45.23, 91.9(b)(2), 91.119, 91.121, 91.151, 91.203(a) and (b), 

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your request and what you should 

do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We received your June 3, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Eye Above Miami, Corp.

filed in Docket No. FAA−2015−2649, but we are unable to process your request any further. 

Your petition does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to 

consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
H. R. 8611 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4755 Southeast 

Dixie Highway in Port Salerno, Florida, as the ‘‘Joseph Bullock Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. JOSEPH BULLOCK POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 4755 Southeast Dixie Highway in Port Salerno, 

Florida, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Joseph Bullock 

Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Joseph Bullock Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

IN RE THE ADOPTION OF J.S.M.

No. 4D21-2309

[October 6, 2021]

Appeal of nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth 

Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Karen M. Miller, Judge; L.T. Case 

No. 502021DR003042XXXXNB.

Rebecca Mercier Vargas, Jane Kreusler-Walsh, and Stephanie L. 

Serafin of Kreusler-Walsh, Vargas & Serafin, P.A., West Palm Beach, for 

Prospective Adoptive Parents M.A.G. and W.H.M.

Elizabeth R. Berkowitz, Law Office of Elizabeth R. Berkowitz, P.A., 

North Palm Beach, Adoption Entity, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

In this prospective adoption, the circuit court sua sponte transferred

venue to Hernando County, Florida. The court determined “there is no 

adoption entity” and, as a result, found venue to be improper in Palm 

Beach County, Florida. But there is an adoption entity and venue is proper 

“[i]n the county where the adoption entity is located.” § 63.087(2)(a)2., Fla. 

Stat. (2020). Because the adoption entity is located in Palm Beach County, 

venue was proper in Palm Beach County, and the court’s sua sponte order 

transferring venue is reversed.

Reversed and remanded.

LEVINE, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8611 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 4755 Southeast Dixie Highway in Port 

Salerno, Florida, as the ‘‘Joseph Bullock Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 8611 EH

1 SECTION 1. JOSEPH BULLOCK POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 4755 Southeast Dixie Highway 

4 in Port Salerno, Florida, shall be known and designated 

5 as the ‘‘Joseph Bullock Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Joseph Bullock Post 

10 Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 10, 

2020. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8611 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostBullock Post Office Building’’. way in Port Salerno, Florida, as the ‘‘Joseph al Service located at 4755 Southeast Dixie High-
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8629 

To require employee consent for any deferral of payroll taxes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 20, 2020 

Mr. CONNOLLY (for himself, Mr. BEYER, Ms. WEXTON, Mr. RASKIN, and Mr. 

COSTA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To require employee consent for any deferral of payroll taxes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Employees 

5 from Surprise Taxes Act of 2020’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT OF EMPLOYEE CONSENT FOR ANY 

7 DEFERRAL OF PAYROLL TAXES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an employee of any 

9 employer, including any Federal Government employer, 

10 the withholding and payment of the tax imposed by section 

11 3101(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and so 


ctelli on DSK11ZRN23PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8629 IH

1 much of the tax imposed by section 3201 of such Code 

2 as is attributable to the rate in effect under such section 

3 3101(a), with respect to such employee shall not be de4 ferred pursuant to section 7508A of such Code for any 

5 pay period ending after the date of the enactment of this 

6 Act, unless the employee provides written consent to such 

7 deferral to the employer. 

8 (b) LIABILITY FOR FAILURE TO REMIT TAXES.—In 

9 the case of any employee who does not provide the written 

10 consent required under subsection (a), the employer of 

11 such employee shall be solely liable according to the rules 

12 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 for any failure to 

13 withhold and remit the taxes described in such subsection. 

14 (c) NOTICE.—Each employer who participates in any 

15 deferral of the withholding and payment of the taxes im16 posed by sections 3101(a) and 3201 of the Internal Rev17 enue Code of 1986 pursuant to section 7508A of such 

18 Code shall provide notice, in such manner as the Secretary 

19 of the Treasury (or the Secretary’s delegate) may pre20 scribe as soon as possible after the date of the enactment 

21 of this Act, to each employee of the employer of the em22 ployee’s right to provide or withhold written consent under 

23 this section, and of the future tax liability which would 


ctelli on DSK11ZRN23PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8629 IH

1 be incurred as a result of providing consent to the deferral 

2 of such taxes. 

Æ 


ctelli on DSK11ZRN23PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF 18 U.S.C.**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of The Immune Response Corporation (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission, accompanied by this written statement (the “Report”), I,John N. Bonfiglio, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to§ 1350 of Chapter 63 of 18 U.S.C., as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                               TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|  /s/  John N. Bonfiglio |
|------------------------------|
| John  N. Bonfiglio, Ph.D.    |
| Chief  Executive Officer     |
| August  19, 2003             |
#### Gregory C. BONTEMPS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SIRKO, Correctional Officer, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-56152

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*930Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed December 21, 2017

Gregory C. Bontemps, Pro Se

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed, R. App. P. 34(a)(2),

MEMORANDUM **

Gregory C. Bontemps, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action after denying his application to proceed in forma pauperis status (“IFP”) on the ground that Bontemps has “three strikes” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C, § 1291, We review de novo, *Washington v. L.A. Cty. Sheriff's Dep't*833 F.3d 1048, 1054 (9th Cir. 2016). We affirm.

The district court properly denied Bon-temps’ request to proceed IFP because at least three of Bontemps’ prior cases qualified as “strikes” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and Bontemps did not allege facts demonstrating that he faced imminent danger at the time he filed his complaint. *See Knapp v. Hogan,*738 F.3d 1106, 1109 (9th Cir. 2013) (defining when a case is frivolous or malicious, or fails to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and can be considered a strike); *Andrews v. Cervantes,*493 F.3d 1047, 1055-57 (9th Cir. 2007) (discussing imminent dan®er excePtion)'

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3,
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Threat Reduction Agency 

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  DTRA Leadership             
  -  DTRA History             
  -  Mission             
  -  Strategic Initiatives             
  -  Foreign Malign Influence             
  -  Agency Overview Brief (pdf)             
  -  Agency Financial Report 
-  Careers & Opportunities    -  Your Civilian Career             
  -  Your Military Career             
  -  Welcome Aboard 
-  Business    -  DTRA Contract Award Data             
  -  Office of Small Business             
  -  Mentor Protege Program 
-  News & Media    -  Press Center 
-  Contact Us		 
-  Joint Operations Center		 

# DTRA FOIA Reading Room Archive

# FOIA Request 21-042 

##                 COVID Information            

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

## Related Links

21-042 PDF

COVID
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                           Certifications Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Southern Investors Service
Company, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Walter M. Mischer, Sr., Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Walter M. Mischer, Sr.
------------------------------------------
Name:  Walter M. Mischer, Sr.
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  March 28, 2003


         In connection with the Annual Report of Southern Investors Service
Company, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Eric Schumann, Senior Vice President - Finance and Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Eric Schumann
------------------------------------------------
Name:  Eric Schumann
Title: Senior Vice President - Finance
       Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
Date:  March 28, 2003
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of New Fuel Systems Inc.
(the "Registrant") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed
with the Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), I, Douglas R.
Myrdal, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.

Dated: April 14, 2016

| | /s/ Douglas R.
      Myrdal | 
| | --------------------------- | 
| | Douglas R. Myrdal           | 
| | Chief Financial Officer     | 

---
(logo) CWCapital

ASSET MANAGEMENT

 

 

**Annual Statement as toCompliance**

**For the Period of January1, 2016 to December 31, 2016**

 

**MSBAM 2015-C21**

**Chandler Corporate CenterII and Plaza Quebec ONLY**

** **

In accordance with Item 1123of Regulation AB and with the requirements detailed in §13.9 of thePooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) for theabove-mentioned CMBS pool, (the “CMBS Pool”), CWCapital AssetManagement LLC (“CWCAM”), in its capacity as Special Servicer, isproviding this Officer’s Certificate with respect to the following:

 

(A)         a review of CWCAM’s activities during the preceding calendar year orportion thereof (the "Reporting Period") and of CWCAM’sperformance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’ssupervision and; 

 

(B)          to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, CWCAM hasfulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

Should you have any questions,please do not hesitate to contact us.  

 

Sincerely,

CWCapital Asset Management LLC

 

 

/s/ David B. Iannarone

David B. Iannarone

President             

 

 

7501 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite500 West, Bethesda, MD 20814

www.cwcapital.com
#### J.K. v. C.K. v. A.M.U. & G.U. Appeal of: J.K.

441 MDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/27/2017

2013-CV-9678-CU (Dauphin)

Affirmed
Order entered July 23, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01270-CV

STEPHANIE ANN NOVICK, Appellant

V.

ANDREW A. SHERVIN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-08-13715-Y

ORDER

On our own motion, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to prepare a 

supplemental clerk’s record in the above-referenced case, trial court cause number DF-08-13715 

(330th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas). The supplemental record should contain

Respondent Andrew A. Shervin’s Special Exceptions Subject to “Motion to Dismiss for Lack of 

Subject-Matter Jurisdiction” filed in the trial court on or about March 20, 2012. The district 

clerk shall file the supplemental clerk=s record within 21 days from the date of this Order.

We DIRECT the clerk of this Court to transmit this order electronically to Gary 

Fitzsimmons, the Dallas County District Clerk.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> BD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          104689
<RECEIVABLES>                                   186384
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                             6521
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                               5643
<PP&E>                                            2866
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  306103
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<PAYABLES>                                      262981
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                              24849
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                 124
<LONG-TERM>                                       6554
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                       2000
<COMMON>                                            87
<OTHER-SE>                                        9508
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    306103
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                 1987
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                              9997
<COMMISSIONS>                                    13854
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                     2771
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                5649
<COMPENSATION>                                   12568
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   5401
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        5401
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3221
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
        

</TABLE>
______________________________/

Opinion filed July 10, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Jackson County.

Shonna Y. Gay, Judge.

Jose Luis Del Toro, pro se, Appellant.

Barbara Debelius, Assistant General Counsel, Department of Corrections, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, PADOVANO, and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.

JOSE LUIS DEL TORO,

Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL D. CREWS, Secretary,

Florida Department of Corrections,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-5176