alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         7085697
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   29828475
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        11158680
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          11130581
<LOANS>                                      145318991
<ALLOWANCE>                                    1888063
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               203474384
<DEPOSITS>                                   165165444
<SHORT-TERM>                                  15902000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            3564674
<LONG-TERM>                                    2144000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       3962774
<OTHER-SE>                                    12735492
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               203474384
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                3309001
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               636371
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 18543
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               3963915
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             1525892
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1780757
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          2183158
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   150000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                1792713
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 660975
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      660975
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    421428
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.01
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.51
<LOANS-NON>                                    2107025
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                828000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               1767483
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    59683
<RECOVERIES>                                     30263
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              1888063
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        1888063
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6243
EARL T. MARSHALL, III, Petitioner - Appellant, versus W. J. THOMPSON, Warden; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-140-1) Submitted: November 3, 1998 Decided: November 18, 1998 Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Earl T. Marshall, III, Appellant Pro Se. Rita R. Valdrini, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Earl T. Marshall, III, appeals from a district court order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994). In light of our recent decision in Pelissero v. Thompson , 155 F.3d 470 (4th Cir. 1998), we affirm the district court’s denial of relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 11-10261.

#### Waugh *v.*Southeastern Gun Co.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18 U. S. C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report
of Hometown International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2015 (the “Report”),
I, Paul F. Morina, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: April 28, 2016 | By: | /s/ Paul F. Morina                                            
|--------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |     | Paul F. Morina                                                
|                      |     | Chief Financial Officer
        (Principal Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Jennifer M. Davis, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect
of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2015-1 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance
statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche
Bank Trust Company Americas.



By:

/s/ Jennifer M. DavisName:

Jennifer M. DavisTitle:

Deputy Chief Financial OfficerDate:

August 19, 2016
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(d)


                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


      H. J. Gruy and Associates, Inc. hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-4 of our reserve report dated
February 7, 1997, relating to the estimated quantities of certain of the
Company's proved reserves of oil and gas and the related estimates of future net
revenue and present values thereof for certain periods, included in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K foro the year ended December 31, 1996, as
well as in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company in
such annual report.  We also consent to the reference to us under the heating
"Experts" in such Registration Statement.


                                       H. J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.


                                       /s/ H. J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
                                       ____________________________________



Houston, Texas
August 12, 1997
### NUMBER 13
- 14 - 004 95
- CV 

## COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ PREVAIL ENERGY INCOR PORATED , A ppellant ,

v. AEGUS OIL LLC , A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 135th District Court of DeWitt County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides , and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 135th District Court
of De Witt County, Texas, in cause number 11

- 06

- 21,923 . Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on groun ds appellant no longer wishes to pursue
th is appeal. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.2

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant ’ s unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See
T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a). Appellant ’ s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will
issue forthwith.
PER CURIAM
D elivered and filed the 9th day of October , 20 14

.
3,291

0

1,637

4,928

BallotsCounted

64

192

0

256

BallotsRejected

NEW HAMPSHIRE

Mail,Fax,Email

Election/Registrar's

Office

Internet

DM

V

Public

Assistance

Office

DisabilitiesAgency

Military

RecruitmentOffice

OtherState

Agency

RegistrationDrives

Registration:Other

824,622

2,414 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

RegistrationFormSource

TotalRegisteredVoters

988,398

SectionA-VoterRegistration

RegistrationFormsReceived

827,036

ConfirmationNotificationsSent

11,942

Polling

Place

UOCAVA Absentee Provisional

Ballot

EarlyVote

Center

Voteby

Mail

Turnout:

Other

680,546

71,939

5,184 0 0 0 0

SectionF-TurnoutbyMethod

CountedFull Counted

Part

Rejected Provisional:

Other

0 0 0 0

SectionE-ProvisionalBallots

UniformedService

Non-militaryOverseas

Other

SectionB-UOCAVA

1,986

3,918

0

5,904

BallotsTransmitted

TOTAL TOTAL

ProvisionalBallotTotal:0 TurnoutTotal:757,669

Note:Somefieldsmaybeblankorzeroduetodatanotbeingreportedor

jurisdictionsnotcollectingthatdata.

Select: NEW HAMPSHI..

TOTAL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                          

  

2016EAVSDataBrief 

U i
#### COM. v. DASZKIEWICZ, M.

1968 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/26/2017

CP-67-CR-0007829-2016 (York)

Affirmed
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 44 (Thursday, March 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5503]



[[Page 10260]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army


Patent Applications Available for Licensing

AGENCY: Office of the Judge Advocate General.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with 37 CFR 404 et seq., announcement is made of 
the availability of the U.S. Patent applications available for 
licensing.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Filing  
           Patent No.                        Title               date   
------------------------------------------------------------------------
08/446,148......................  Chemotherapeutic Treatment    05/22/95
                                   of Bacterial Infections.             
08/446,149......................  Chemotherapeutic Treatment    05/22/95
                                   of Bacterial Infections              
                                   With An Antibiotic                   
                                   Encapsulated Within A                
                                   Biodegradable Polymeric              
                                   Matrix.                              
08/590,973......................  Novel Burst-Free Sustained    01/24/96
                                   Release Poly (Lactide/               
                                   Glycolide) Microspheres.             
------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Paul Mele, ORTA, Walter Reed Army 
Institute of Research, Washington, DC 20307-5100.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.
Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-5503 Filed 3-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
683

0

1,577

2,260

BallotsCounted

5

6

0

11

BallotsRejected

WESTVIRGINIA

Mail,Fax,Email

Election/Registrar's

Office

Internet

DM

V

Public

Assistance

Office

DisabilitiesAgency

Military

RecruitmentOffice

OtherState

Agency

RegistrationDrives

Registration:Other

31,953

29,512

26,815

35,099

17,007

0 0 0 0 0

RegistrationFormSource

TotalRegisteredVoters

1,254,768

SectionA-VoterRegistration

RegistrationFormsReceived

572,037

ConfirmationNotificationsSent

70,804

Polling

Place

UOCAVA Absentee Provisional

Ballot

EarlyVote

Center

Voteby

Mail

Turnout:

Other

476,538

209,777

14,786 1,607 3,285 0 0

SectionF-TurnoutbyMethod

CountedFull Counted

Part

Rejected Provisional:

Other

2,294

807

0 0

SectionE-ProvisionalBallots

UniformedService

Non-militaryOverseas

Other

SectionB-UOCAVA

792

1,363

0

2,155

BallotsTransmitted

TOTAL TOTAL

ProvisionalBallotTotal:3,285 TurnoutTotal:732,362

Select: WESTVIRGINIA

TOTAL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                          

  

2016EAVSDataBrief 

U i
2022 EAVS Data Brief: North Carolina EAVS Jurisdictions:

100 

 Voter Registration 

Active Reg. Voters as of Nov. 8, 20221 

6,488,756 

Reg. Forms Received2* 

2,806,179 

Total Confirmation Notices Sent3* 

1,058,260 

Voters Removed from Reg. Rolls4* 

981,703 

Source of Registration Applications5 

Motor Vehicle Dept. 50.0% 

In Person 15.1% 

Mail, Email, Fax 15.0% 

Other 13.6% 

Online 6.4% 

 Voting and Turnout 

Voters Participating By Mode6 

7 Turnout 

48.5% 

In-Person 

Election Day

1,578,581 

41.7% 

Mail 

179,280 

4.7% 

Other 

102,201 

2.7% 

In-Person 

Early 

1,929,870 

50.9% 

Total Voting Locations8: 3,204 

Total Poll Workers9: 23,221 

Election Technology 

Percentage of Jurisdictions Using...10 

100.0% 

Ballot 

Marking 

Devices 

100.0%

Electronic 

Poll 

Books 

100.0% 

Scanners 

0.0% 

DREs w/o 

VVPAT 

0.0% 

DREs with 

VVPAT 

0.0% 

Hand 

Counting 

 Mail Ballots 

• 248,794 mail ballots transmitted11 

• 73.7% of transmitted mail ballots returned by voters12 

• 97.8% of returned mail ballots counted13 

• 2.2% of returned mail ballots rejected14 

• Did not conduct all-mail election15 

• Did not allow drop boxes16 

• Allowed ballot curing17 

 Election Audits18 

-- Access audit 

-- Ballot design audit 

Ballot reconciliation ✔ audit 

Compliance/ -- procedural audit 

-- Eligibility audit 

-- Legal audit 

Logic and accuracy ✔ testing 

Post-election ✔ tabulation audit 

✔ Other 

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at www.eac.gov 

/research-and-data/datasets-codebooks-and-surveys. 

Responses of “Does not apply,” “Data not available,” and “Valid 

skip” are shown as zeroes or dashes. Percentages may not sum 

to 100% because of missing data or rounding. 

* Close of registration for 2020 

general election to close of 

registration for 2022 general 

election. 

1 A1b of EAVS. 

2 A3a of EAVS. 

3 A8a of EAVS. 

4 A9a of EAVS. 

5 Mail, Email, Fax is A4a/A3a. 

In Person is A4b/A3a. Online is 

A4c/A3a. Motor Vehicle Dept. is 

A4d/A3a. Other is the sum of 

A4e–A4l/A3a. May not sum to 

100% because of missing data. 

6 In-Person Election Day is F1b. 

Mail is F1d+F1g. In-Person Early 

is F1f. Other is F1c+F1e+F1h. 

7 F1a of EAVS divided by citizen 

voting age population (CVAP). 

8 D2a of EAVS. 

9 D7a of EAVS. 

10 F3a–f, F5a–F9a of EAVS; 

number of jurisdictions that 

responded “Yes” divided by

number of jurisdictions in 

state/territory. 

11 C1a of EAVS. 

12 C1b/C1a of EAVS. 

13 C8a/C1b of EAVS. 

14 C9a/C1b of EAVS. 

15 Q17 and Q17a of Policy 

Survey. 

16 Q19 of Policy Survey. 

17 Q20 of Policy Survey. 

18 Q36 of Policy Survey. See 

survey questionnaire for full 

definitions of each type of 

audit.
#### COM. v. NIEVES, A.

1371 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/22/2017

CP-45-CR-0000031-2013 (Monroe)

Affirmed
1

U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) 

Funding Advisory Opinion Request

Date Issued: July 28, 2015

Requestor: South Dakota Secretary of State

Question: Would the use of HAVA funds for an in-person absentee voting location be an 

approved expense from the South Dakota Help America Vote Act funds? If so, would South 

Dakota be required to amend its current State plan to reflect those uses?

Discussion: The EAC Grants Office has responsibility to apply the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) Circular A-87, Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments 

to all requested expenditures, which includes ensuring that the expenditures are (1) allowable; (2) 

allocable; and (3) reasonable. In general, HAVA allows states to use Section 251 funds in three 

instances. First, states may use Section 251 funds to comply with the requirements in Title III of 

HAVA. After a state certifies compliance with the Title III requirements, a state may also use 

Section 251 funds “to carry out other activities to improve the administration of elections for 

Federal office...” Finally, a state may use its minimum payment amount applicable to a state 

under Section 252(c) 42 U.S.C. § 15401(b)(2) for the improvement of the administration of 

federal elections. HAVA section 101 funds may be used to improve the administration of Federal 

elections. 

South Dakota state law currently allows for no excuse absentee voting 46 days before a primary 

and general election. South Dakotans may complete an absentee ballot application form and 

request a ballot to be mailed to them. State law also allows an absentee ballot request in-person 

at the office of their county auditor in the county courthouse. South Dakota has 66 counties. 

Two of those counties do not have a county courthouse.

The Office of Grants Management has determined this is an appropriate improvement to the 

administration of Federal elections. The cost is allowable, allocable and reasonable. 

South Dakota amended its state plan in 2014 to include in-person absentee voting locations.

Commissioner Answer: EAC finds that establishing in-person absentee voting locations is an 

allowable expense under HAVA.
**Exhibit 32**

**Certification of Chief Executive OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of Alliance Imaging, Inc. (the “*Company*”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge,that:

(i)    theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterended June 30, 2005 (the “*Report*”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)   the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Dated: August 9, 2005 |   | /s/ PAUL S.  VIVIANO                                |
|----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                       |   | Paul S. Viviano                                     |
|                       |   | *Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----

**Certification of Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of Alliance Imaging, Inc. (the “*Company*”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge,that:

(i)    theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterended June 30, 2005 (the “*Report*”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)   the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Dated: August 9, 2005 |     | /s/ R. BRIAN  HANSON                                    |
|----------------------------|----------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |     | R. Brian Hanson                                         |
|                       | * * | *Executive Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer* |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2


                   CONSENT OF H. J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

     We hereby consent to the use of the name H.J. Gruy and Associates, Inc. and
of references to H.J. Gruy and Associates, Inc. and to the inclusion of and
references to our report, or information contained therein, dated February 4,
2003, prepared for Torch Energy Advisors Incorporated in the Torch Energy
Royalty Trust Annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

                                         H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
                                         Texas Registration Number F-000637


                                         By: /s/ Sylvia Castilleja
                                             ---------------------
                                             Sylvia Castilleja, P. E.
                                             Vice President

Houston, Texas
March 28, 2003
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-598
In Re: TERRY O'CONNOR PAGE, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 12, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terry O'Connor Page, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Terry O'Connor Page filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order compelling a United States Magistrate Judge to apply what Page deems the proper law when considering claims of ineffective assistance of counsel raised by state prisoners. We deny the petition. Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). Mandamus relief is only available when there are no other means by which the relief sought could be granted, In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987), and may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re United Steelworkers , 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). The party seeking mandamus relief carries the heavy burden of showing that he has "no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires" and that his right to such relief is "clear and indisputable." Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc. , 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980). Page has not made such a showing. Accordingly, we deny his petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED