alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONCEO



In connection with the Annual Report of Plains Exploration & Production Company (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James C. Flores, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



To the best of my knowledge, after reasonable investigation:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 26, 2003.



| |  | /S/ JAMES C. FLORESJames C. Flores Chief Executive
Officer
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
#### IN RE: Sarkis ANTABIAN, Debtor, Sarkis Antabian, Appellant, v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Appellee.

No. 17-60001

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

February 6, 2018 *

Filed February 8, 2018

Jayne T. Kaplan, Esquire, ’ Jayne T. Kaplan, Pasadena, CA, for Appellant

J. Alexandra Rhim, Attorney, Hemar, Rousso & Heald. LLP, Encino, CA, for Appellee

Before: CALLAHAN and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and PRATT,** District Judge.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Sarkis Antabian appeals a judgment by the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate *776Panel (“BAP”), which affirmed the bankruptcy court’s dismissal of Antabian’s adversary complaint against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d) and affirm.

1. We agree with Antabian and the BAP that the sale of the subject property during the pendency of Antabian’s appeal to the BAP does not render the case moot. As the BAP pointed out, “the foreclosure sale generated cash proceeds, which were paid to Wells Fargo,” and “[t]he issue of Wells Fargo’s entitlement to those proceeds remains a live controversy.”

2. We “review[ ] decisions of the BAP de novo and appl[y] the same standard of review that the BAP applied to the bankruptcy court’s ruling.” *In re Deitz,*760 F.3d 1038, 1039 (9th Cir. 2014) (order). We review a dismissal under Rule 41(b) for abuse of discretion. *In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Prod. Liab. Litig.,*460 F.3d 1217, 1226 (9th Cir. 2006) (en banc). Although dismissal is a harsh penalty, “we will overturn a dismissal sanction only if we have a definite and firm conviction that it was clearly outside the acceptable range of sanctions.” *Id,*(quoting *Malone v. U.S. Postal Serv.,*833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th Cir. 1987)).

The bankruptcy court applied the correct legal standard under Rule 41(b). *See In re Phenylpropanolamine,*460 F.3d at 1226 (discussing factors a court should consider in determining whether to dismiss under Rule 41(b)). The bankruptcy court made explicit findings as to each of the essential factors, concluding that four of the five factors weighed in favor of dismissal. The court’s analysis of the relevant factors is reasonable and supported by the record. Although the facts do not compel dismissal, the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in electing to do so.2

AFFIRMED.

***

 disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid*776ed by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. Antabian also appealed from a separate, but identical BAP judgment. The other case, No. 17-60002, is resolved by a separate memorandum disposition.

2

, Because Wells Fargo's motion to dismiss and the bankruptcy court's order were based on Rule 41(b), we reject Antabian’s argument that the dismissal of his adversary complaint is governed by Rule 37, instead of Rule 41(b).
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 43 (Wednesday, March 5, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 9989]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5352]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 68


Connection of Telephone Equipment to the Telephone Network; 
Correction

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; correcting amendments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to the final regulations 
which related to the connection of terminal equipment to the telephone 
network. (61 FR 42386 August 15, 1996)

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 5, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
 William von Alven, (202) 418-2342.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The final regulations that are the subject of these corrections 
relate to the means of connection of equipment making use of the Public 
Switched Digital Service (PSDS) and the Integrated Services Digital 
Network (ISDN).

Need for Correction

    As published, the final regulations contain errors which may prove 
to be misleading and are in need of correction.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 68

    Communications equipment, Telephone.

    Accordingly, 47 CFR Part 68 is amended by making the following 
correction:

PART 68--CONNECTION OF TERMINAL EQUIPMENT TO THE TELEPHONE NETWORK

    1. The authority citation for Part 68 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: Secs. 1, 4, 5, 201-5, 208, 215, 218, 226, 227, 303, 
313, 403, 404, 410, 602 of the Communications Act of 1934 as 
amended, 47 U.S.C. 151. 154. 155. 201-5, 208, 215, 218, 226, 227, 
303, 314, 403, 410, 602, 610.


Sec. 68.308  [Corrected]

    2. Section 68.308 is amended by revising the heading to the 
introductory text of paragraph (h)(3) and adding new paragraph (h)(4) 
to read as follows:


Sec. 68.308  Signal power limitations.

* * * * *
    (h) * * *
    (3) PSDS Types II and III Maximum Output Pulse Templates.
* * * * *
    (4) Limitations on Terminal Equipment Connected to ISDN BRA. If 
registered terminal equipment connecting to ISDN BRA services contains 
a digital-to-analog converter, or generates signals directly in digital 
form, which are intended for eventual conversion into voiceband analog 
signals, the encoded analog content of the digital signal must be 
limited. The maximum equivalent power of the encoded analog signals, 
other than live voice as derived from a zero-level-decoder test 
configuration, shall not exceed -12 dBm when averaged over a three 
second interval. The maximum equivalent power of encoded analog 
signals, as derived by a zero-level decoder test configuration, for 
network control signaling, shall not exceed -3 dBm when averaged over 
any three-second interval.

Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-5352 Filed 3-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
# Hispanic Serving Institutions (HSIs)

- Biden-Harris Administration Awards More Than $40 Million to Support Hispanic-Serving Institutions The Biden-Harris Administration announced  today that it will award more than $40 million to Hispanic Serving Institutions  (HSIs) to support Hispanic and Latino students and the institutions preparing  them for the future.