alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 89

Expressing the sense of Congress that the 2004 Summer Olympic Games

be held in Cape Town, South Africa.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 22, 1997

Ms. FURSE (for herself, Ms. WATERS, Mrs. MEEK of Florida, Ms. EDDIE

BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Ms. MCKINNEY, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida,

Ms. NORTON, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mrs. CLAYTON, Mr. JACKSON, Mr.

HILLIARD, Ms. KILPATRICK, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. FATTAH, Mr.

PAYNE, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. FORD, Mr. RUSH, Mr. SCOTT, Mr. WATT of

North Carolina, Mr. OWENS, Mr. DELLUMS, Mr. STOKES, Mr. CLYBURN,

Mr. WYNN, Mr. DIXON, Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD, Mr. BISHOP, Mr.

LEWIS of Georgia, Ms. CARSON, Mr. JEFFERSON, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr.

CONYERS, Mr. CLAY, Mr. THOMPSON, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. RANGEL, Ms.

JACKSON-LEE, and Ms. CHRISTIAN-GREEN) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International

Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that the 2004 Summer

Olympic Games be held in Cape Town, South Africa.

Whereas the Olympic Games have never been held on the

continent of Africa;

Whereas Africa, with 53 countries and with a population of

more than 720 million people, is ready to receive its first

Olympic Games;
2

•HCON 89 IH

Whereas South Africa ended years of apartheid control in

1994 and elected a government committed to democracy

and the national unity of all its citizens;

Whereas South Africa continues to promote national reconciliation among all South Africans, and recognizes the

capacity of sports to unify the nation;

Whereas South Africa has adopted a constitution as the supreme law of the land and through it guarantees democratic values, social justice, fundamental human rights,

and economic opportunities for all;

Whereas Cape Town, South Africa, is a modern city with a

history, beauty, and attractions to keep the world and

visitors captivated for years to come; and

Whereas South Africa’s President, Nelson Mandela, who

serves as the honorary President of the Cape Town 2004

Olympic bid, has endorsed Cape Town’s bid for the 2004

Summer Olympic Games: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 2004 Summer Olympic Games be held in Cape Town,

4 South Africa.

Æ
#### Dianne Roberta ADENIJI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FLORIDA STATE COLLEGE, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-12657 Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(January 16, 2018)

Dianne Roberta Adeniji, Pro Se

Kelly L. DeGance, Samantha Giudici Berdecia, Alexander DeGance Barnett, PA, Jacksonville, FL, for Defendant-Ap-pellee

Before TJOFLAT, JULIE CARNES and HULL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Dianne Adeniji, proceeding *pro se,*appeals the District Court’s dismissal of her action brought under the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court based its dismissal on the doctrine of *res judicata.*Adeniji contends that *res judicata*does not bar the instant lawsuit, though it is the sixth one she has brought against Florida State College at Jacksonville regarding a trespass order issued in 2011. She adds that *res judicata*does not apply to intentional discrimination claims brought between 2011 and the present. Thus, Adeniji posits, the District Court should not have dismissed her suit and instead should have granted either her motion for summary judgment or her motion for default judgment.

We review *de novo*a district court’s application of *res judicata. Griswold v. Cty. of Hillsborough,*598 F.3d 1289, 1292 (11th Cir. 2010). We liberally construe *pro se*briefs. *Timson v. Sampson,*518 F.3d 870, 874 (11th Cir. 2008). *Res judicata*precludes claims which a plaintiff actually raised or could have raised in a prior suit when (1) there is a final judgment on the merits in a prior suit, (2) rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction, (3) involving the same parties, and (4) involving the same cause of action. *Citibank, N.A. v. Data Lease Fin. Corp.,*904 F.2d 1498, 1501 (11th Cir. 1990). If a present case arises out of the same nucleus of operative fact as a former case, the two cases qualify as the “same claim or cause of action for purposes of *res judicata.” Id.*at 1503 (quotations omitted).

Here, the District Court properly concluded that Adeniji’s sixth action regarding a 2011 trespass order is barred by *res judicata.*The prior lawsuits were concluded with final judgments on the merits, rendered by a court of competent jurisdic*672tion, and involved the same parties and the same claims. *See Citibank,*904 F.2d at 1501, 1503. Adeniji also cites no case, and we are aware of none, which holds that *res judicata*does not apply to intentional discrimination claims brought between 2011 and now. The District Court therefore properly terminated Adeniji’s pending motions for summary judgment and default judgment and dismissed her action.

AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-40081 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOHN L. MILLS, JR.,

DefendantAppellant.

--------------------------------------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-99-CR-231-1

-----------------------------------------------------------

September 28, 2000

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent John L. Mills, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and

has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California

, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Mills has received a copy

of counsel’s motion and brief. Although he requested and was granted an extension of time to file

a response, Mi lls failed to file a response to the motion to withdraw. Our independent review of

counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL

IS DISMISSED. See 5 T C IR

. R. 42.2.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 44 (Thursday, March 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5458]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Yakima Province Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Yakima Province Advisory Committee will meet on March 12, 
1997, in the Cle Elum Ranger District office warehouse conference room, 
803 W. 2nd Street, Cle Elum, Washington. The meeting will begin at 9:00 
a.m. and continue until 3:00 p.m. Agenda items to be covered will 
include agency updates and information relative to the development and 
role of an advisory subcommittee in providing advice on the Snoqualmie 
Pass Adaptive Management Area. All Yakima Province Advisory Committee 
meetings are open to the public. Interested citizens are welcome to 
attend.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Direct questions regarding this 
meeting to Paul Hart, Designated Federal Official, USDA, Wenatchee 
National Forest, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee, Washington 98801, 509-662-
4335.

    Dated: February 25, 1997.
Glenn Hoffman,
Acting Forest Supervisor, Wenatchee National Forest.
[FR Doc. 97-5458 Filed 3-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 839 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 839

 To amend title 49, United States Code, to include a revenue metric in 
 the port network components to better achieve the policy goals of the 
                  National Multimodal Freight Network.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 29, 2019

  Ms. Brownley of California introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 49, United States Code, to include a revenue metric in 
 the port network components to better achieve the policy goals of the 
                  National Multimodal Freight Network.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Multimodal Freight Network 
Improvement Act''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL MULTIMODAL FREIGHT NETWORK.

    Section 70103 of title 49, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(2)(C) by inserting ``, and the public 
        ports of the United States that have a total annual value of 
        cargo of at least $1,000,000,000, as identified by the United 
        States Customs and Border Protection and reported by the Bureau 
        of the Census'' after ``is available''; and
            (2) in subsection (c) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) Required network components.--In designating or 
        redesignating the National Multimodal Freight Network, the 
        Under Secretary shall ensure that the National Multimodal 
        Freight Network includes the components listed under subsection 
        (b)(2).''.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Benjamin Douglas GUIDRY, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40705 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 22, 2017

Jason B. Smith, Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Dallas Craig Hughes, Law Offices of D. Craig Hughes, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before DENNIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Benjamin Douglas Guidry appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for two counts of sexual exploitation of children and one count of making a false claim against the United States. Guidry argues that: (1) his counsel was constitutionally ineffective for advising him to accept the plea agreement, and (2) his 600 month sentence is substantively unreasonable. The Government moves for summary dismissal of the appeal based upon the appeal waiver in Guidry’s plea agree*802ment or, alternatively, for an extension of time to file a brief.

We review the validity of an appeal waiver de novo. *See United States v. Baymon,*312 F.3d 725, 727 (5th Cir. 2002). The written plea agreement and the rearraignment transcript reflect that Guidry knowingly and voluntarily agreed to the appeal waiver, making the appeal waiver enforceable. *See United States v. Portillo,*18 F.3d 290, 292 (5th Cir. 1994). Guidry’s challenge to his sentence does not fall within the exception to the appeal waiver for a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Accordingly, the appeal is barred by the waiver. *See United States v. Bond,*414 F.3d 542, 544 (5th Cir. 2005).

As to Guidry’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the record is not sufficiently developed to permit direct review of this claim. *See United States v. Isgar,*739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). Because that is usually the case, a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion is the preferred method for raising claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. *See Massaro v. United States,*538 U.S. 500, 503-09, 123 S.Ct. 1690, 155 L.Ed.2d 714 (2003).

The appeal is therefore DISMISSED without prejudice to Guidry’s right to pursue an ineffective assistance of counsel claim in a § 2255 proceeding. We GRANT the Government’s motion to dismiss the appeal, and we DENY the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
No. 11-10159.

#### Dixon *v.*Kernan, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-10345.

No. 11-10346.

#### Larsen *v.*United States; and Stone *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 461 Fed. Appx. 461.
**
**Exhibit 31**

**Certifications**

I,Richard Simpson, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respectof the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC27 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omitto state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliancestatement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestationreports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as anexhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells FargoBank, National Association; Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas; CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc.; National Tax Search, LLC;Northmarq Capital, LLC; and Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC. 

 
Date: March 28, 2019/s/ Richard Simpson
Richard Simpson

President, CitigroupCommercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)

CGCMT 2015-GC27 Certifications (2018) 
**
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8434 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8434

  To require the Secretary of the Treasury to establish a Restaurant 
             Reimbursement Program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 2020

  Mr. Rice of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Secretary of the Treasury to establish a Restaurant 
             Reimbursement Program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``America Dines Out Act''.

SEC. 2. RESTAURANT REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall establish a 
Restaurant Reimbursement Program to make payments to restaurants in 
accordance with this section for portions of a bill on which the 
restaurant provided a discount to a customer.
    (b) Limitations.--Payments may only be made under this section--
            (1) for 50 percent of the discount provided to a customer 
        on food and non-alcoholic beverages, but in an amount not to 
        exceed $12 per customer per day;
            (2) for discounts provided to customers on a Monday, 
        Tuesday, or Wednesday during the 1-month period beginning two 
        weeks after the date of enactment of this Act; and
            (3) for discounts provided to customers who were dining at 
        the physical location of the restaurant.
    (c) Application.--A restaurant that seeks to receive a payment 
under this section shall submit an application to the Secretary of the 
Treasury in such form and manner, and containing such information, as 
the Secretary determines appropriate.
    (d) Appropriation.--There is appropriated, out of amounts in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to the Secretary of the Treasury 
$3,400,000,000 to carry out this section.
                                 <all>
```
1 

# Memo

To: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0799 From: Joseph McDonald CC: Ed Nam, U.S. EPA-OTAQ-ASD Date: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 Re: EV Charging Infrastructure Guidelines 2009 citation
A hard copy of the following citation: Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Deployment Guidelines - British Columbia.” Report by the Electric Transportation Engineering Corporation for Natural Resources Canada and BCHydro. is available within EPA’s Docket Center. This document has been copyrighted and is not available in the electronic docket. Parties that wish to view a hard copy of this document can do so at the at the EPA Docket Center: Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center, EPA/DC, EPA We st, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566- 1744, and the telephone number for the Air Docket is (202) 566-1742.
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I,  Trent  J.  Carman,  certify  that:

1.  I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-Q  of  Air  Methods
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material  fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made,  in  light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading  with  respect  to  the  period  covered  by  this  report;

3.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of,  and  for,  the  periods  presented  in  this  report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing  and  maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-15(e)  and  15d-15(e))  for  the  registrant and have:

     a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or  caused such
disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to  be designed under our supervision, to
ensure  that  material  information  relating  to  the registrant, including its
consolidated  subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly  during  the  period  in  which  this  report  is  being  prepared;

     b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures  and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of  the  disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by  this  report  based  on  such  evaluation;  and

     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the registrant's most recent
fiscal  quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially
affect,  the  registrant's  internal  control  over  financial  reporting;  and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's  auditors  and  the  audit  committee  of the registrant's board of
directors  (or  persons  performing  the  equivalent  functions):

     a)  All  significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation  of  internal  control  over  financial reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize  and  report  financial  information;  and

     b)  Any  fraud,  whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees  who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting.


Date:  August  13,  2004

/s/  Trent  J.  Carman
     -----------------
Trent  J.  Carman
Chief  Financial  Officer


<PAGE>
EX10-4GadberryAgreement




EXHIBIT 10.4
RENEWAL ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This Renewal Addendum No. 1 is made this 13th day of March, 2014, to the Employment Agreement between Jon M. Gadberry (the “Employee”) and Home Federal Bank, a federally chartered savings bank (the “Bank”), dated March 27, 2013 (the “Employment Agreement”).  The Board of Directors of the Bank and of HF Financial Corp., the parent company of the Bank, have authorized the Chairman of the Bank’s Board of Directors to execute this Renewal Addendum No. 1 on behalf of the Bank.  


WHEREAS, the term of Employment Agreement expires on June 30, 2014, unless renewed by mutual agreement of Employee and the Bank; and


WHEREAS, the Employment Agreement may be renewed for not less than one year by providing notice thereof no later than ninety (90) days prior to the end of the then existing term; and


WHEREAS, Employee and the Bank do mutually agree to renew the term of the Employment Agreement.


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of paragraph 1 of the Employment Agreement, the parties agree as follows:  


1.    The term of the Employment Agreement is hereby renewed and the Employment Agreement shall continue in effect through June 30, 2015.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Employee and the Bank have executed this Renewal Addendum No. 1 effective as of the day and year first above written.




EMPLOYEE    HOME FEDERAL BANK 
    
/s/ Jon M. Gadberry        /s/ Michael M. Vekich     
Jon M. Gadberry        By: Michael M. Vekich 
        Its: Chairman of the Board