This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of

new books are listed in the first FEDERAL

REGISTER issue of each week. 

# Rules and Regulations Federal Register 

### 62553

Vol. 79, No. 202

Monday, October 20, 2014

**DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE**

**Office of the Secretary**

**15 CFR Part 4**

**[Docket No. 140127076–4811–02]**

**RIN 0605–AA33**

**Public Information, Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act**  **Regulations**

**AGENCY :**  Department of Commerce.

**ACTION :**  Final rule.

**SUMMARY :**  This rule amends the Department of Commerce’s (Department) regulations under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Privacy Act. The FOIA regulations are revised to clarify, update and streamline the language of several procedural provisions, including methods for submitting FOIA requests and appeals and the time limits for filing an administrative appeal, and to incorporate certain changes brought about by the amendments to the FOIA
under the OPEN Government Act of 2007. Additionally, the FOIA regulations are updated to reflect developments in the case law. The Privacy Act regulations are revised to clarify, update and streamline several procedural provisions, including the methods for submitting appeals of Privacy Act requests and the time limits for filing a Privacy Act appeal. Additionally, the Privacy Act regulations are updated to make technical changes to the applicable exemptions.

**DATES :**  These amendments are effective November 19, 2014.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Mark R. Tallarico, Senior Counsel, (202) 482–8156, Office of the General Counsel, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Background Information

On February 27, 2014, the Department of Commerce published a proposed rule revising its existing regulations under the FOIA and Privacy Act. See 79 FR

11025.

This rule amends the Department’s regulations under the FOIA to clarify, update and streamline the language of several procedural provisions, including the methods for submitting FOIA requests and appeals and the time limits for responding to a request and filing an administrative appeal, and to incorporate certain changes brought about by the amendments to the FOIA
under the OPEN Government Act of 2007, Public Law 110–175, 121 Stat. 2524. Additionally, the FOIA regulations are being updated to reflect developments in case law.

Specifically, this action amends the procedures for filing requests and appeals for both the FOIA and the Privacy Act, and allows parties to use delivery services or file online through FOIAonline (http:// foiaonline.regulations.gov ). The rule also vests the Office of the Inspector General’s (OIG) Counsel, rather than the
Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Administration, with responsibility for addressing OIG appeals. It clarifies when the 20-day statutory time limit for responding to requests begins (i.e., when requests are received by the proper DOC component’s FOIA office, when requests are modified for purposes of reformulating a request so that it reasonably describes the requests sought), and it further clarifies that certain inactions by a requester, such as his or her failure to respond to a component’s one-time clarification request within 30 calendar days, failure to submit an agreement to pay anticipated fees in excess of $20 within 30 calendar days of the component’s fee estimate, and failure to make an advanced payment within 30 calendar days of the component’s fee estimate, may result in a request being closed. For FOIA appeals, the Department clarifies that if the deadline for filing an administrative appeal falls on a Saturday, Sunday or legal public holiday, an appeal received by 5 p.m. Eastern Time, the next business day will be deemed timely. Pursuant to this rule, it is no longer a requirement that FOIA appeals include a copy of the initial FOIA request and the component’s initial denial, if any.

To implement the OPEN Government Act of 2007, this rule: (1) AllowsDepartment components to seek a onetime clarification of a request and toll the time period for responding to the request until the requester clarifies; (2) adds a definition for ‘‘Representative of the news media, or news media requester’’ as defined in the OPEN Government Act; and (3) places limits on the fees charged when Department components do not comply with the statutory time limits under the FOIA.

This rule also revises the Department’s regulations under the Privacy Act to clarify, update and streamline several procedural provisions, including the methods for submitting Privacy Act requests and appeals, and the time limits for filing a Privacy Act appeal. In particular, the action amends the Department’s Privacy Act regulations regarding applicable exceptions to reflect new Department wide systems of records notices published since the last time the regulations were updated, and makes requesting your own medical records from the Department easier. This rule adopts other changes to mirror those made to the FOIA regulations in order to maintain consistency between the provisions.

Finally, this rule revises Appendix A to part 4 to: Update mailing addresses and telephone addresses of Department components for receipt and processing of requests for records under the FOIA and Privacy Act and requests for
correction and amendment under the Privacy Act; include contact information for components receiving requests for records under the FOIA and Privacy Act and requests for correction and amendment under the Privacy Act; identify components maintaining public inspection facilities; and identify components maintaining separate
online Electronic FOIA Libraries. Appendix B to part 4 is also revised to include an updated list of Department officials authorized to deny requests for records under the FOIA and Privacy Act and requests for correction or amendment under the Privacy Act.

Public Comments

Interested persons were afforded the opportunity to participate in the rulemaking process through submission of written comments on the proposed


### 62554 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 202 / Monday, October 20, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

rule during the 30-day open comment period. The Department received three public submissions in response to the proposed rulemaking. Due consideration was given to each comment received and, in response, the Department made modifications to the rule to enhance clarity and/or adopt
several of the comments to enable a more efficient FOIA process. In addition, the Department made technical edits to the appendices to Part 4, unprompted by comments, including correcting a component’s contact information identified in Appendix A and updating the list of denying officials identified in Appendix B.

Section 4.1 (General Provisions)

One commenter recommended that proposed § 4.1 be rewritten to better reflect President Obama’s policy (i.e., that components discretionarily release
records where no foreseeable harm exists and that there is a presumption of openness). As a general matter, the Department unequivocally adheres to and follows the Administration policy (as required) regarding discretionary releases and maintaining a presumption of openness, and components indeed discretionarily release records when no foreseeable harm exists. The Department recognizes that the language contained in the proposed revision to § 4.1(a) could be misconstrued to not require components to make discretionary
releases when no foreseeable harm exists; that was not the intention. This final rule clarifies this provision by revising the language to require components to make discretionary
releases of records whenever disclosure would not foreseeably harm an interest protected by a FOIA exemption and, when required, to do so in accordance
with current law and/or Executive Branch policy.

Section 4.2 (Public Reading Rooms)

One commenter offered that the proposed regulations are ambiguous as to how components will provide their
indices of available records and recommended that components make current subject-matter indices available electronically in their FOIA Libraries. The Department accepts this suggestion and inserts a provision in § 4.2(a) requiring components to publish their current indices electronically.

The same commenter also suggested reinstatement of the description of the records that the FOIA requires to be made available for public inspection and copying in § 4.2(d). The Department agrees and reinstates the language that appeared in § 4.2(d) of the former regulations and codifies it in § 4.2(c) in
this Final Rule.

This commenter further suggested that the Department adopt a policy to ‘‘establish categories of records that can be disclosed regularly’’ and recommended that § 4.2 be revised to add a provision stating that ‘‘each component be responsible for establishing categories of records that can be disclosed regularly and routinely posting such records on its Web site.’’ While the Department encourages components to proactively disclose records on their Web sites (to the extent that they can be made publicly available), the Department declines to adopt the commenter’s suggestion given
the limited resources available to Department components and the
decentralized nature of the FOIA process within the Department.

The same commenter also recommended that § 4.2 be revised to include a provision requiring that components, ‘‘to the extent feasible, post in its FOIA Library copies of all records, regardless of form or format, which have been released to any person under the FOIA, other than records released in response to first-party requests.’’ To the extent that they can be made publicly available, the Department encourages the posting of all records released in response to FOIA requests onto the FOIAonline Web site, http:// foiaonline.regulations.gov. However, given that resources are needed to properly post records, it is important that Department components retain flexibility in determining how best to use those resources, including flexibility to use other options such as posting logs of FOIA responses. Accordingly, the Department declines to adopt the commenter’s suggestion in this Final
Rule.

This commenter further recommended that § 4.2 be revised to include a provision requiring that components ‘‘post, in a searchable format on its Web site, a log listing all FOIA requests received by the agency and their processing status.’’ The Department and its components utilize the FOIAonline Web site, http:// foiaonline.regulations.gov, where requesters can submit FOIA requests, track the status of their requests, search for requests submitted by other requesters, access previously released records, and generate agency-specific FOIA processing reports. Accordingly, the Department declines to adopt the commenter’s suggestion.

Section 4.3 (Records Under the FOIA)

One commenter recommended that a reference to the obligation to extract information from component computer databases be included as a primary statement in § 4.3(b) rather than being relegated to a qualification statement as set forth in the proposed rule. The Department does not agree that § 4.3(b) needs to be modified as suggested by the commenter. The provision concerning
the extraction of information remains in the same position (second sentence) as it is in the existing regulations where it seeks to qualify the first statement in § 4.3(b)—that is, the question of whether the Department creates or compiles records vs. merely extracting them from a database is fact dependent. Accordingly, the Department is maintaining the language as published in the Proposed Rule.

Section 4.4 (Requirements for Making Requests)

One commenter recommended revising the language in proposed § 4.4(c) to ‘‘provide adequate time for requesters to respond after having been asked to reasonably describe the records sought’’ and suggests a 30 day time period. This commenter also recommended inserting language clarifying that components’ notice to a requester that it is closing a request for failure to reasonably describe the records sought constitutes an adverse action. The Department agrees with both
of these recommendations. It was an oversight to not include these provisions in the proposed rule, and the Department has included such language in this Final Rule at § 4.4(c).

Another commenter expressed concern that the Department’s proposed revision to § 4.4(c) (Description of records sought) would allow components to prematurely close FOIA requests which curtails requesters’ access to information and directly
contravenes the Obama
Administration’s commitment to transparency and open government. In addition to recommending that the Department not adopt this revision, this commenter also suggested that components ‘‘should not close the file prematurely if requesters do not amend their requests, but instead [should] relegate the request to a lower processing track.’’

The Department does not agree with
this commenter’s concerns that revisions to § 4.4(c) would result in the premature closing of FOIA requests, that it would curtail requesters’ access to information in violation of the FOIA, or
that it contravenes the Obama Administration’s open government and transparency policies. The revisions to § 4.4(c) seek to galvanize Departmental procedures for how components are to


### 62555 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 202 / Monday, October 20, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

process requests that do not reasonably describe the records sought. The FOIA requires that requesters satisfy two conditions when submitting a FOIA request—that the request reasonably describes the records sought and that it is made in accordance with agency’s published rule setting forth the procedures for filing a FOIA request. In instances where a component determines that a request does not reasonably describe the records sought, the provisions at § 4.4(c) require that the component contact the requester and
inform him or her what additional
information is needed to meet the requirements of the FOIA—namely, how to reformulate or modify the request so that it reasonably describes records that the component may be able to locate. By incorporating the first commenter’s recommendation in § 4.4(c) of this final rule, requesters will have 30 calendar days to modify or reformulate their request to meet the requirements of the FOIA before a component can close a request. Moreover, in instances where a component closes a FOIA request because a requester fails to reasonably describe the records sought, the requester will be afforded administrative appeal rights to challenge the component’s decision. Accordingly, the Department declines to adopt these comments.

Section 4.6 (Time Limits and Expedited Processing)

One commenter recommended revising § 4.6(b) (Initial response and appeal) to insert a provision stating that: ‘‘As soon as practicable after receiving a request, a component shall provide the requester with the estimated date it will complete processing the request. The component shall notify the requester that he or she may reformulate the request, if he or she so chooses, to revise the scope of the request in order to potentially reduce processing time.’’ In support, the commenter cites the OPEN Government Act of 2007, Public Law 110–175, as requiring agencies to provide requesters with an estimated date of completion for processing
requests.

The OPEN Government Act does not require agencies to proactively provide requesters with an estimated completion date for processing their requests, as suggested by the commenter. Rather, the 2007 FOIA Amendments require that each agency—

establish a telephone line or Internet services that provides information about the status of a request to the person making the request using the assigned tracking number, including—(i) the date on which the agency originally received the request; and (ii) an estimated date on which the agency will complete the action on the request.

Consistent with the requirements of the OPEN Government Act, and as set forth in the Appendix A to part 4, each component maintains a phone line where requesters can contact a FOIA professional to obtain an estimated completion date for their request. Additionally, components’ participation in the FOIAonline Web site, http:// foiaonline.regulations.gov, offers another mechanism through which requesters can communicate electronically with FOIA staff to obtain an estimated completion date of their request. Because our current regulations and practices are in compliance with OPEN Government Act, the Department declines to adopt the commenter’s suggestion as it would create an unnecessary burden on components’
FOIA offices.

The same commenter also recommended revising § 4.6(c) (Clarification of request) to insert two provisions—one stating that ‘‘Components should also attempt to clarify with the requester by telephone’’ and another at the end of § 4.6(c) stating ‘‘Notwithstanding the other provisions of this paragraph, if a component has any uncertainty regarding an aspect of the request, it shall attempt to communicate with the requester to clarify the scope of his or her FOIA request.’’

The Department strongly encourages
FOIA staff to communicate with requesters, by telephone and/or email, as much and as early as possible in order to resolve issues (clarifications or otherwise). Ultimately, however, clarifications must be made in writing.
The commenter’s second recommendation is already addressed in § 4.6(c) and no further changes are necessary. Accordingly, the Department declines to adopt the commenter’s suggested changes.

A second commenter recommended removing from § 4.6(f)(3) (Expedited processing) the reference to ‘‘main professional activity or occupation’’ from the example as to how a requester can establish that he or she is ‘‘primarily engaged in disseminating information.’’ In support, this commenter offers that having a ‘‘professional’’ requirement would exclude many requesters from obtaining expedited processing because ‘‘they may engage primarily in
information dissemination while it is not a profession or occupation or paid activity.’’

The Department did not propose to revise the language addressing expedited processing in the Proposed Rule. The Department’s regulations regarding expedited processing (found at 15 CFR 4.6(f)(1)(iv)) mirror the FOIA and allow for this type of processing
whenever it is determined that a FOIA request involves an ‘‘urgency to inform the public about an actual or alleged Federal Government activity, if made by a person primarily engaged in disseminating information.’’ 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(E)(v)(II). The purpose of the language at issue in § 4.6(f)(3) is to give some clarity for how a requester can establish that he or she is ‘‘primarily engaged in disseminating information’’—a requirement set forth in the FOIA—even though the requester is
not a full-time member of the media. Although we did not propose any revisions to the expedited processing regulations, we recognize the need to provide additional guidance on this subject. Thus, we revised § 4.6(f)(3) in this Final Rule to provide more clarityas to how requesters, who are not fulltime members of the media, can still establish that they are ‘‘primarily engaged in disseminating information.’’

Section 4.7 (Responses to Requests)

One commenter suggested that § 4.7 be revised to add a provision stating that ‘‘Components shall use plain language
in all written communications with requesters.’’ This commenter cites The Plain Writing Act of 2010 as the basis for this revision. By law, the Department and its components are required to follow The Plain Writing Act of 2010. Therefore, it is unnecessary to include such a provision in the Department’s FOIA regulations.

The same commenter also recommended that § 4.7 be revised to add language restating President Obama’s openness and transparency policy and Attorney General Holder’s FOIA guidelines which require agencies to identify a foreseeable harm in order
to withhold information under a FOIA exemption. We included language
similar to what the commenter suggested in § 4.1 in this Final Rule and, thus, we decline to make the suggested changes to § 4.7.

This commenter further recommended that § 4.7 be revised to add a provision stating that ‘‘Components shall generally respond with the requester by email or through the FOIAonline Web site, rather than postal mail, unless he or she specifies otherwise.’’ The Department encourages communication with requesters by electronic means. However, it is important that Department components have flexibility in determining how best to communicate with requesters, including flexibility to use the U.S. mail


### 62556 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 202 / Monday, October 20, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

or other delivery options. Therefore, the Department is not adopting the commenter’s suggested changes.

The same commenter recommended that § 4.7(a) be revised to add a provision stating that ‘‘Components shall provide automated updates on the status of FOIA requests through FOIAonline.’’ For support, the
commenter cites the OPEN Government Act as requiring agencies to establish a service allowing requesters to inquire about the status of their requests.

The OPEN Government Act requires agencies to establish either a telephone
line or an Internet service through which requesters can obtain an estimated completion date. The Department and its components are in full compliance with this requirement, having established telephones lines (contained in Appendix A to part 4 of the Final Rule) by which requesters can inquire about the status of their requests. Further, the Department’s participation in the FOIAonline Web
site also serves to meet the OPEN Government Act requirement by providing an electronic portal through which requesters can inquire about the status of their requests. The FOIAonline Web site also provides requesters with the ability to track the status of their request. Given these current practices, we find it unnecessary to adopt any of the commenter’s suggested changes in
this Final Rule.

This commenter also recommended that § 4.7(b) be revised to add a provision stating that ‘‘If a request
involves a voluminous amount of material or searches in multiple locations, a component shall provide a requester with interim responses, releasing the information on a rolling
basis.’’

To the extent feasible, Department components presently issue interim releases when a request involves voluminous records. The Department’s current policy, however, only allows for
the interim release of records when there are no FOIA exemptions applicable to the requested information. The Department agrees with this
recommendation and will include such language mirroring our policy on
interim releases in this Final Rule at § 4.7.

Section 4.8 (Classified Information)

One commenter suggested that the Department notify a requester when it has performed a declassification review in processing a FOIA request. This commenter recommended adding a provision to § 4.8 stating that ‘‘If the component determines that the records
should continue to be classified and must be withheld, the component shall explain in its response letter to the requester that the records are properly
classified and that this determination is based on a declassification review, with an explanation of how that review confirmed the continuing validity of the national security classification.’’

We decline to adopt the commenter’s suggested changes. The Department’s regulations at § 4.8 require components, in processing a request for classified information, to review the information
to determine whether it should remain classified. There is no obligation by an agency to explain its declassification process. If the information remains classified, it is within a component’s
discretion on the extent to which it wishes to explain its review process in the determination letter. Further, requiring components to explain their declassification processes, as suggested by this commenter, raises the potential for inadvertent sharing of information
that could disclose the nature of the
classified material.

Section 4.9 (Business Information)

One commenter offered two recommendations to improve the clarity and accuracy of this section. First, striking ‘‘out of this section’’ from the end of the first sentence in § 4.9(c). Second, inserting ‘‘and will be withheld’’ in § 4.9(h)(1) to read ‘‘The component determines that the information is exempt and will be withheld under a FOIA exemption, other than exemption (b)(4).’’ We agree that these changes improve clarity and accuracy, and therefore we adopt these changes in this Final Rule.

Section 4.10 (Appeals From Initial Determinations or Untimely Delays)

One commenter recommended that the Department provide requesters 60 calendar days to submit administrative appeals, instead of the 30 days from the date of the component’s adverse determination letter provided for at § 4.10(a). The Department did not propose any revisions to the 30 calendar day window for submitting administrative appeals in its Proposed Rule. The Department declines to adopt this recommendation; 30 calendar days provides a requester with a reasonable
amount of time to submit an administrative appeal.

Two commenters recommended that the Department remove from §§ 4.10(b)(1) and (b)(2) the requirement that requesters include a copy of their original request and initial denial, if any, with the submission of their administrative appeals. One of these commenters suggested that the Department change the wording from
‘‘shall’’ to ‘‘should’’ or some other standard that does not impose a strict requirement that could bar an appeal.
The other commenter recommended that the pertinent language in §§ 4.10(b)(1) and (b)(2) be revised to state ‘‘In all cases, the appeal (written or electronic) must include the assigned request number or a copy of the original request and initial denial, if any.’’

The Department did not propose any substantive revisions to the provisions in §§ 4.10(b)(1) and (b)(2). The Department’s recent implementation of the FOIAonline system, however, makes it unnecessary for requesters to include copies of their original request and the component’s initial denial, if any, with their FOIA appeal since it will already be available in the system. Therefore, the Department will revise, as suggested, the language in §§ 4.10(b)(1) and (b)(2) to state that ‘‘the appeal ‘should’ include a copy of the original request and initial denial, if any.’’

One commenter also recommended that the Department remove from §§ 4.10(b)(1) and (b)(2) the requirement that appeals ‘‘must’’ include a statement of the reasons for why the records requested should be made available and why the adverse determination was in error. The Department did not propose any revisions to the requirement that appeals must include a statement of the reasons in §§ 4.10(b)(1) and (b)(2). However, the Department no longer views this information as mandatory to process FOIA appeals. Therefore, the Department will revise, as suggested,
these sections in this Final Rule to state that ‘‘the appeal ‘should’ include a statement of the reasons for why the records requested should be made available and why the adverse determination, if any, was in error.’’

This commenter also suggested that the Department provide information
about the Office of Government Information Services’ dispute resolution services in its FOIA regulations and in appeal determinations. To this effect,
the commenter recommended that § 4.10 be revised to add a new
subsection that states ‘‘The Office of
Government Information Services (OGIS) within the National Archives
and Records Administration offers mediation services to resolve disputes between requesters and agencies as a non-exclusive alternative to litigation. Requesters with concerns about the handling of their requests may contact OGIS. Components shall provide the requester with the name and contact
information of the Office of Government Information Services in an appeal
determination letter.’’


### 62557 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 202 / Monday, October 20, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

The Department agrees with the
commenter’s first recommendation and will create a new § 4.1(c) in this Final Rule to add language informing requesters about the dispute resolution services offered by OGIS. The Department disagrees with the
commenter’s other recommendation that
we include the name and contact information of OGIS in appeal determination letters. Our final appeal decisions are not appealable. For example, if the Department determines on appeal that records are to be
withheld under certain FOIA exemptions, then it is our belief that this
decision is made within the construct of the FOIA and relevant supporting case law. For this reason, the Department does not adopt the commenter’s suggested changes.

Section 4.11 (Fees)

One commenter supported the change to proposed § 4.11(b)(6), which defines ‘‘representative of the news media’’ for fee purposes.

One commenter expressed concern that the Department’s 16-cent per page duplication fee contained in § 4.11(c) is
inconsistent with the FOIA and OMB Guidelines. As a general matter, the Department notes that its fee provisions
are written to conform with the OMB Guidelines, which establish uniform standards for fee matters. Conformity with the OMB Guidelines is required by
the FOIA. See 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)(i). Although the Department did not propose any changes to the duplication fee in its Proposed Rule, the Department
re-examined its costs to make duplications and determined that a fee
reduction is warranted. This Final Rule revises § 4.11(c)(2) to provide for a duplication fee of .08 cents per page.

The same commenter also expressed
concern that the reference to ‘‘the cost of operating a central processing unit in § 4.11(c)(3)(ii) is an archaic and obsolete reference’’ and suggested that it be removed from the regulations. Although the Department did not propose any changes to the referenced language in its Proposed Rule, the Department agrees that this phrase is obsolete and revised § 4.11(c)(3)(ii) in this Final Rule to remove this language.

One commenter proposed that ‘‘the Department should adopt a policy that it will not charge a fee if the total fee would be less than $50.00’’ and recommended including such a provision in § 4.11(d). The Department did not propose any changes to the fee threshold amount in its Proposed Rule. The Department disagrees with the commenter’s suggested change and is maintaining the language in the current regulations at § 4.11(d)(4), which requires requesters to pay fees in excess of $20.00. This amount is comparable to the amounts in which other agencies begin charging fees.

The same commenter also suggested that ‘‘the Department adopt a policy that components may waive or reduce fees
in additional circumstances’’ and recommended including such a provision in § 4.11(k). The Department did not propose any changes to its policy for reducing or waiving fees in its Proposed Rule. The Department disagrees with the commenter and is maintaining the language in the current regulations at § 4.11(k). The FOIA
establishes a standard for waiver or reduction of fees and the Department’s regulations are intended to define the
manner in which this standard is to be applied. Components must make fee
determinations consistent with the FOIA and Department regulations.

Section 4.29 (Appeal of Initial Adverse Agency Determination on Correction or Amendment)

One commenter objected to the moving of the administrative appellate authority in § 4.29 to the Counsel for the Inspector General in cases involving requests for OIG records. This commenter states that this change differs from the process in almost every other agency, and remains entirely unexplained and unjustified. The
commenter also believes ‘‘it would seem fairer to requesters to have some
administrative distance between the initial denial authority and the appellate authority in such cases[.]’’

The Department disagrees with the commenter and is maintaining the language as proposed in § 4.29 and § 4.10, with respect to the processing of FOIA and Privacy Act appeals resulting from adverse determinations issued by the Office of the Inspector General. Reserving appellate authority to the OIG for appeals involving its own records is necessary to ensure the OIG’s independence in conducting its oversight activities of the Department, including audits, inspections, evaluations, and investigations. For example, this separate appellate authority will minimize the risk of
inadvertent disclosure within the Department of confidential investigative informants or targets and the investigative or audit strategy of the OIG that could interfere with ongoing oversight. The Department also notes that other executive departments and agencies (NASA being one) similarly reserve appellate authority to their OIGs for appeals involving OIG records. Finally, contrary to the commenter’s concerns, §§ 4.10 and 4.29 provide for separation between the initial denying authority and the appellate authority within the OIG. Under this Final Rule, the official who is designated as the denying official, the OIG’s FOIA Officer, does not have the authority to decide appeals.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), the Chief Counsel for Regulation certified at the Proposed Rule stage that this regulation will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The factual basis for this certification was published with the proposed rule and is not repeated here. No comments were received regarding the economic impact of this final rule. As a result, a final regulatory flexibility analysis is not required and one was not prepared.

Executive Order 12866

The Office of Management and Budget has determined that this regulation is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866.

Paperwork Reduction Act

This regulation does not contain a
‘‘collection of information’’ as defined by the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.

List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 4

Appeals, Freedom of Information Act, Information, Privacy, Privacy Act.

Dated: October 9, 2014.

Catrina D. Purvis, Chief Privacy Office and Director of Open

Government.

For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of Commerce amends 15 CFR part 4 as follows:

**PART 4—DISCLOSURE OF**
**GOVERNMENT INFORMATION**

■ 1. The authority citation for part 4
continues to read as follows:

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 5 U.S.C. 552; 5 U.S.C. 552a; 5 U.S.C. 553; 31 U.S.C. 3717; 44 U.S.C. 3101; Reorganization Plan No. 5 of

1950.

**Subpart A—Freedom of Information**

**Act**

■ 2. Section 4.1 is amended by revising the section heading and paragraph (a), and adding new paragraph (c) to read as
follows:

**§ 4.1 General provisions.**

(a) The information in this part is furnished for the guidance of the public


### 62558 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 202 / Monday, October 20, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

and in compliance with the requirements of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), as amended (5 U.S.C. 552). This part sets forth the procedures the Department of Commerce (Department) and its components follow to make publicly available materials and indices specified in 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2) and records requested under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(3). Information routinely provided to the public as part of a regular Department activity (for example, press releases issued by the Office of Public Affairs) may be provided to the public without following this part. In addition, as a matter of policy, the Department shall make discretionary releases of records or information exempt from disclosure under the FOIA when required to do so
in accordance with current law and/or Executive Branch policy. This policy does not create any right enforceable in

court.

* * * * *

(c) The Office of Government Information Services (OGIS) within the
National Archives and Records
Administration offers mediation services to resolve disputes betweenrequesters and agencies as a nonexclusive alternative to litigation. Requesters with concerns about the handling of their requests may contact

OGIS.

■ 3. Section 4.2 is revised to read as
follows:

**§ 4.2 Public reading rooms.**

(a) Records that the FOIA requires to be made available for public inspection and copying are accessible electronically through the Department’s ‘‘Electronic FOIA Library’’ on the Department’s Web site, http:// www.doc.gov, which includes links to Web sites for those components that
maintain Electronic FOIA Libraries. These records may also be accessible at the FOIAonline Web site, http:// foiaonline.regulations.gov. Each component of the Department is responsible for determining which of its records are required to be made available, as well as identifying
additional records of interest to the public that are appropriate for disclosure, and for making those records
available either in its own Electronic Library or in the Department’s central Electronic FOIA Library. Components
that maintain their own Electronic FOIA Library are designated as such in Appendix A to this part. Each component shall also maintain and make available electronically a current subject-matter index of the records made available electronically. Each component shall ensure that posted records and indices are updated regularly, at least quarterly.

(b) If the requester does not have
access to the Internet and wishes to obtain information regarding publicly available information, he or she may contact the component’s FOIA office. Appendix A to this part contains the contact information for the components’ FOIA offices. Some components may also maintain physical public reading rooms. These components and their
contact information are listed in Appendix A to this part.

(c) The Department and its components shall maintain and make available electronically for public inspection:

(1) A current index providing information for the public as to any matter that is issued, adopted, or promulgated after July 4, 1997, and that is retained as a record and is required to be made available or published. Copies of the index are available upon request after payment of the direct cost of duplication;

(2) Copies of records that have been released and that the component that maintains them determines, because of their subject matter, have become or are likely to become the subject of subsequent requests for substantially the same records;

(3) A general index of the records described in paragraph (c)(2) of this
section;

(4) Final opinions and orders, including concurring and dissenting opinions made in the adjudication of

cases;

(5) Those statements of policy and interpretations that have been adopted by a component and are not published
in the Federal Register; and

(6) Administrative staff manuals and
instructions to staff that affect a member of the public.

■ 4. Section 4.3 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) through (c) to read as
follows:

**§ 4.3 Records under the FOIA.**

(a) Records under the FOIA include all Government records, regardless of format, medium or physical characteristics, and electronic records and information, audiotapes, videotapes, Compact Disks, DVDs, and photographs.

(b) In response to a FOIA request, the Department has no obligation to create, compile, or obtain from outside the Department a record to satisfy a request (for example, extrapolating information from existing agency records, reformatting available information, preparing new electronic programs or databases, or creating data through calculations of rations, proportions, percentages, trends, frequency distributions, correlations, or comparisons). In complying with a request for records (including data and other electronically-stored information), whether the Department creates or compiles records (as by undertaking significant programming work) or merely extracts them from an existing database is fact dependent. The Department shall undertake reasonable
efforts to search for records stored in electronic format (including data and other electronically-stored information).

(c) Department officials may, upon request, create and provide new records to the public pursuant to statutes that authorize the creation and provision of new records for a fee, such as the first paragraph of 15 U.S.C. 1525, or in accordance with authority otherwise provided by law. Such creation and provision of records is outside the scope
of the FOIA.

* * * * *

■ 5. Section 4.4 is revised to read as
follows:

**§ 4.4 Requirements for making requests.**

(a) How made and addressed. The Department has a decentralized system for responding to FOIA requests, with each component designating a FOIA office to process records from that component. All components have the capability to receive requests electronically either through electronic mail (email) or the FOIAonline Web
site, http:// www.foiaonline.regulations.gov. A request for Department records that are not customarily made available to the public as part of the Department’s regular informational services (or pursuant to a user fee statute), must be in writing and shall be processed under the FOIA, regardless of whether the FOIA is mentioned in the request. Requests must include the requester’s full name and a legible return address. Requesters may also include other contact information, such as an email address and a telephone number. For the quickest handling, the request (and envelope, if the request is mailed or hand delivered) should be marked ‘‘Freedom of Information Act Request.’’ Requests may be submitted by U.S. mail, delivery service, email, facsimile, or online at the FOIAonline Web site, http://foiaonline.regulations.gov. Requests made by mail, delivery service, email, or facsimile should be sent to the Department component identified in Appendix A to this part that maintains those records requested, and should be


### 62559 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 202 / Monday, October 20, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

1 The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), which is established as an agency of the United States within the Department of Commerce, operates under its own FOIA regulations at 37 CFR part 102, subpart A. Accordingly, requests for USPTO records, and any appeals thereof, should be sent directly to the USPTO. sent to the addresses, email addresses, or numbers listed in Appendix A to this part or the Department’s Web site, http://www.doc.gov. 1 If the proper component cannot be determined, the request should be sent to the central facility identified in Appendix A to this part. The central facility will forward the request to the component(s) it believes most likely to have the requested records. Requests will be considered received for purposes of the 20-day time limit of § 4.6 as of the date it is received by the proper component’s
FOIA office.

(b) Requests for records about an individual or oneself. For requests for records about oneself, § 4.24 of this part contains additional requirements. For requests for records about another individual, either written authorization signed by the individual permitting
disclosure of his or her records to the requester or proof that the individual is deceased (for example, a copy of a death certificate or an obituary) will facilitate processing the request.

(c) Description of records sought. A FOIA request must reasonably describe the agency records sought, to enable Department personnel to locate them
with a reasonable amount of effort. Whenever possible, a request should include specific information about each record sought, such as the date, title or name, author, recipient, and subject matter of the record, and the name and
location of the office where the record might be found. In addition, if records about a court case are sought, the title of the case, the court in which the case was filed, and the nature of the case should be included. If known, any file designations or descriptions of the requested records should be included. As a general rule, the more specifically the request describes the records sought, the greater the likelihood that the Department will be able to locate those records. Before submitting their requests, requesters may contact the component’s FOIA contact to discuss the records they are seeking and to receive assistance in describing the records (contact information for these individuals is contained in Appendix A to this part and on the Department’s Web site, http://www.doc.gov ). If a component determines that a request does not reasonably describe the records sought, it shall inform the requester
what additional information is needed or how the request is otherwise insufficient, to enable the requester to modify the request to meet the requirements of this section. Requesters who are attempting to reformulate or modify such a request may discuss their request with the component’s designated FOIA contact. When a requester fails to provide sufficient detail within 30 calendar days after having been asked to reasonably describe the records sought, the component shall notify the requester in writing that the request has not been properly made, that no further action will be taken, and that the FOIA request
is closed. Such a notice constitutes an adverse determination under § 4.7(c) for which components shall follow the procedures for a denial letter under § 4.7(d). In cases where a requester has modified his or her request, the date of receipt for purposes of the 20-day time limit of § 4.6 shall be the date of receipt of the modified request.

■ 6. Section 4.5 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) through (c) to read as
follows:

**§ 4.5 Responsibility for responding to requests.** 

(a) In general. Except as stated in paragraph (b) of this section, the proper component of the Department to respond to a request for records is the component that first receives the request and has responsive records (or in the instance of where no records exist, the component that first receives the request and is likely to have responsive records), or the component to which the Departmental FOIA Officer or component FOIA Officer assigns lead responsibility for responding to the request. Where a component’s FOIA office determines that a request was misdirected within the Department, the receiving component’s FOIA office shall route the request to the FOIA office of the proper component(s). Records responsive to a request shall include those records within the Department’s possession and control as of the date the Department begins its search for them.

(b) Consultations and referrals. When a component receives a request for a record (or a portion thereof) in its possession that originated with another Federal agency subject to the FOIA, the component shall refer the record to that agency for direct response to the requester (see § 4.8 for additional
information about referrals of classified information). In instances where a record is requested that originated with the Department and another Federal agency has a significant interest in the record (or a portion thereof), the component shall consult with that Federal agency before responding to a requester. When a component receives a request for a record (or a portion thereof) in its possession that originated with another Federal agency that is not subject to the FOIA, the component shall consult with that Federal agency before responding to the requester.

(c) Notice of referral. Whenever a component refers a record to another Federal agency for direct response to the requester, the component’s FOIA Officer shall notify the requester in writing of the referral and inform the requester of the name of the agency to which the
record was referred.

* * * * *

■ 7. Section 4.6 is amended by redesignating paragraphs (c) through (e) as (d) through (f), revising paragraph (b) and newly redesignated paragraphs (d)(1) and (2), (e) and (f)(3), and adding new paragraph (c) to read as follows:

**§ 4.6 Time limits and expedited processing.** 

* * * * *

(b) Initial response and appeal. Unless the component and the requester have agreed otherwise, or when
‘‘unusual circumstances’’ exist as provided for in paragraph (d) of this section, a determination whether to comply with a FOIA request shall be made by components within 20 working days (i.e., excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays) of the receipt of a request for a record under this part by the proper component identified in accordance with § 4.5(a). In instances involving misdirected requests that are re-routed pursuant to § 4.5(a), the response time
shall commence on the date that the request is received by the proper component, but in any event not later than ten working days after the request is first received by any designated component. An administrative appeal, other than an appeal from a request made to the Office of the Inspector General, shall be decided within 20 working days of its receipt by the Office
of the General Counsel. An administrative appeal from a request made to the Office of the Inspector
General shall be decided within 20 working days of its receipt by the Office of the Inspector General Office of Counsel. The Department’s failure to comply with the time limits identified in this paragraph constitutes exhaustion of the requester’s administrative remedies for the purposes of judicial action to compel disclosure.

(c) Clarification of request. Components may seek a one-time clarification of a request for records under this part. The component’s


### 62560 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 202 / Monday, October 20, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

request for clarification must be in writing. When a component seeks clarification of a request, the time for responding to a request set forth in § 4.6(b) is tolled until the requester responds to the clarification request. The tolled period will end when the component that sought the clarification receives a response from the requester. If a component asks for clarification and does not receive a written response from the requester within 30 calendar days from the date of the component’s clarification request, the component will presume that the requester is no longer interested and notify the requester that the request will be closed.

(d) Unusual circumstances. (1) Components may extend the time period for processing a FOIA request only in ‘‘unusual circumstances,’’ as described in paragraph (d)(2) of this section, in which the component shall, before expiration of the twenty-day period to respond, notify the requester of the extension in writing of the
unusual circumstances involved and of the date by which processing of the request is expected to be completed. If
the extension is for more than ten working days, the component shall provide the requester with an opportunity to modify the request or agree to an alternative time period for processing the original or modified
request.

(2) For purposes of this section,
unusual circumstances include:

(i) The need to search for and collect the requested agency records from field
facilities or other establishments that are separate from the office processing the
request;

(ii) The need to search for, collect, and appropriately examine a voluminous amount of separate and distinct records that are the subject of a single request; or

(iii) The need to consult with another Federal agency having a substantial
interest in the determination of the FOIA request or among two or more components of the Department having substantial subject-matter interest in the determination of the request.

* * * * *

(e) Multi-track processing. (1) A
component must use two or more processing tracks by distinguishing between simple and more complex requests based on the amount of work and/or time needed to process the request, including the amount of pages involved, and whether the request qualifies for expedited processing as described in paragraph (f) of this

section.

(2) A component using multi-track processing may provide requesters in its slower track(s) with an opportunity to limit the scope of their requests in order to qualify for faster processing. A component doing so shall contact the requester by telephone, email, letter, or through the FOIAonline Web site, http://foiaonline.regulations.gov,
whichever is the most efficient in each

case.

(f) * * * (3) A requester who seeks expedited processing must submit a statement,
certified to be true and correct to the best of that person’s knowledge and belief, explaining in detail the basis for requesting expedited processing. For example, a requester within the category described in paragraph (f)(1)(iv) of this section, if not a full-time member of the news media, must establish that he or she is a person whose primary professional activity or occupation is information dissemination, though it need not be his or her sole occupation. A requester within the category described in paragraph (f)(1)(iv) of this section must also establish a particular urgency to inform the public about the Government activity involved in the request—one that extends beyond the public’s right to know about Government activity generally. The
existence of numerous articles published on a given subject can be helpful to establishing the requirement that there be an ‘‘urgency to inform’’ the public on a topic. As a matter of administrative discretion, a component may waive the formal certification requirement.

* * * * *

■ 8. Section 4.7 is revised to read as
follows:

**§ 4.7 Responses to requests.**

(a) Acknowledgment of requests. Upon receipt of a request, a component ordinarily shall send an acknowledgement letter to the requester which shall provide an assigned request number for further reference and, if necessary, confirm whether the requester is willing to pay fees.

(b) Interim responses. If a request involves voluminous records or requires searches in multiple locations, to the extent feasible, a component shall provide the requester with interim responses consisting of fully releasable
records.

(c) Grants of requests. If a component makes a determination to grant a request in whole or in part, it shall notify the requester in writing of such
determination and disclose records to the requester promptly upon payment of any applicable fees. Records disclosed in part shall be marked or annotated to show the applicable FOIA exemption(s) and the amount of information deleted, unless doing so would harm an interest protected by an applicable exemption.
The location of the information deleted shall also be indicated on the record, if
feasible.

(d) Adverse determinations of requests. If a component makes an adverse determination regarding a request, it shall notify the requester of that determination in writing. An
adverse determination is a denial of a request and includes decisions that: The requested record is exempt, in whole or in part; the request does not reasonably describe the records sought; the information requested is not a record subject to the FOIA; the requested record does not exist, cannot be located, or has previously been destroyed; or the requested record is not readily reproducible in the form or format sought by the requester. Adverse
determinations also include denials involving fees or fee waiver matters or denials of requests for expedited processing.

(e) Content of denial. The denial letter shall be signed by an official listed in Appendix B to this part (or a designee),
and shall include:

(1) The name and title or position of the person responsible for the denial;

(2) A brief statement of the reason(s) for the denial, including any FOIA exemption(s) applied by the component in denying the request;

(3) An estimate of the volume of any records or information withheld, by providing the number of pages or some
other reasonable form of estimation. This estimate is not required if the volume is otherwise indicated by
deletions marked on records that are disclosed in part, or if providing an
estimate would harm an interest protected by an applicable FOIA exemption; and

(4) A statement that the denial may be appealed under § 4.10, and a list of the requirements for filing an appeal set forth in § 4.10(b).

■ 9. Section 4.8 is revised to read as
follows:

**§ 4.8 Classified information.**

In processing a request for
information classified under Executive Order 13526 or any other executive order concerning the classification of records, the information shall be
reviewed to determine whether it should remain classified. Ordinarily the component or other Federal agency that
classified the information should conduct the review, except that if a
record contains information that has been derivatively classified by a


### 62561 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 202 / Monday, October 20, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

component because it contains information classified by another component or agency, the component shall refer the responsibility for responding to the request to the component or agency that classified the underlying information. Information determined to no longer require
classification shall not be withheld on the basis of FOIA exemption (b)(1) (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(1)), but should be reviewed to assess whether any other FOIA exemption should be invoked. Appeals involving classified information shall be processed in accordance with § 4.10(c).

■ 10. Section 4.9 is amended by revising paragraphs (c), (h) and (j) to read as
follows:

**§ 4.9 Business information.**

* * * * *

(c) Designation of business information. A submitter of business information must use good-faith efforts to designate, by appropriate markings,
either at the time of submission or at a reasonable time thereafter, any portions
of its submission that it considers to be protected from disclosure under FOIA exemption (b)(4). These designations will expire ten years after the date of the
submission unless the submitter requests, and provides justification for, a longer period.

* * * * *

(h) Exceptions to notice requirements. The notice requirements of paragraphs (d) and (g) of this section shall not apply
if: (1) The component determines that the information is exempt and will be withheld under a FOIA exemption, other than exemption (b)(4);

(2) The information has been lawfully published or has been officially made available to the public;

(3) Disclosure of the information is required by statute (other than the FOIA) or by a regulation issued in accordance with Executive Order 12600;

or (4) The designation made by the submitter under paragraph (c) of this section appears obviously frivolous, except that, in such a case, the component shall provide the submitter written notice of any final decision to disclose the information seven working days from the date the submitter
receives the notice.

* * * * *

(j) Corresponding notice to requester. Whenever a component provides a
submitter with notice and an opportunity to object to disclosure under paragraph (d) of this section, the component shall notify the requester that the request is being processed under the provisions of this regulation and, as a consequence, there may be a delay in receiving a response. The notice to the requester will not include any of the specific information contained in the records being requested. Whenever a submitter files a lawsuit seeking to prevent the disclosure of business information, the component shall notify the requester of such action and, as a consequence, there may be further delay in receiving a

response.

■ 11. Section 4.10 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) through (c) to
read as follows:

**§ 4.10 Appeals from initial determinations or untimely delays.** 

(a)(1) If a request for records to a component other than the Office of Inspector General is initially denied in whole or in part, or has not been timely determined, or if a requester receives an adverse determination regarding any other matter listed under this subpart (as described in § 4.7(c)), the requester may file an appeal. Appeals can be submitted in writing or electronically, as described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section. The appeal must be received by the Office of the General Counsel during normal business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday) within 30 calendar days of the
date of the written denial of the adverse determination or, if there has been no determination, an appeal may be submitted any time after the due date, including the last extension under § 4.6(d), of the adverse determination. Written or electronic appeals arriving
after normal business hours will be
deemed received on the next normal business day. If the 30th calendar day falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or a legal public holiday, an appeal received by 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, the next business day will be deemed timely. Appeals received after the 30-day limit
will not be considered.

(2) If a request for records to the Office of Inspector General is initially denied in whole or in part, or has not been timely determined, or if a requester
receives an adverse determination regarding any other matter listed under this subpart (as described in § 4.7(c)), the requester may file an appeal. Appeals can be submitted in writing or electronically, as described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section. The appeal must be received by the Office of Inspector General, Office of Counsel, during normal business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday) within 30 calendar days of the
date of the written denial of the adverse determination or, if there has been no determination, an appeal may be submitted any time after the due date, including the last extension under § 4.6(d), of the adverse determination. Written or electronic appeals arriving
after normal business hours will be
deemed received on the next normal business day. If the 30th calendar day falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or a legal public holiday, an appeal received by 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, the next business day will be deemed timely. Appeals received after the 30-day limit
will not be considered.

(b)(1) Appeals, other than appeals from requests made to the Office of Inspector General, shall be decided by
the Assistant General Counsel for Administration (AGC-Admin), except that appeals for records which were initially denied by the AGC-Admin shall be decided by the General Counsel. Written appeals should be addressed to the AGC-Admin, or the
General Counsel if the records were initially denied by the AGC-Admin. The address of both is: U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of the General Counsel, Room 5875, 14th and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. An appeal may also be sent
via facsimile at 202–482–2552. For a written appeal, both the letter and the appeal envelope should be clearly
marked ‘‘Freedom of Information Act Appeal.’’ Appeals may also be submitted electronically either by email

to FOIAAppeals@doc.gov or online at the FOIAonline Web site, http:// foiaonline.regulations.gov, if requesters have a FOIAonline account. In all cases, the appeal (written or electronic) should include a copy of the original request and initial denial, if any. All appeals
should include a statement of the reasons why the records requested should be made available and why the
adverse determination was in error. No opportunity for personal appearance, oral argument or hearing on appeal is provided. Upon receipt of an appeal, AGC-Admin, or the General Counsel if the records were initially denied by AGC-Admin, ordinarily shall send an acknowledgement letter to the requester which shall confirm receipt of the requester’s appeal.

(2) Appeals of initial and untimely determinations by the Office of Inspector General shall be decided by the Counsel to the Inspector General, except that appeals for records which were initially denied by the Counsel to the Inspector General shall be decided by the Deputy Inspector General. Written appeals should be addressed to the Counsel to the Inspector General, or the Deputy Inspector General if the


### 62562 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 202 / Monday, October 20, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

records were initially denied by the Counsel to the Inspector General. The address of both is: U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Counsel, Room 7898C, 14th and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. An appeal may also be sent via facsimile at 202– 501–7335. For a written appeal, both the letter and the appeal envelope should be clearly marked ‘‘Freedom of Information Act Appeal.’’ Appeals may also be submitted electronically either by email

to FOIA@oig.doc.gov or online at the FOIAonline Web site, http:// foiaonline.regulations.gov, if requesters have a FOIAonline account. In all cases, the appeal (written or electronic) should include a copy of the original request and initial denial, if any. All appeals
should include a statement of the reasons why the records requested should be made available and why the
adverse determination was in error. No opportunity for personal appearance, oral argument or hearing on appeal is provided. Upon receipt of an appeal, the Counsel to the Inspector General, or the Deputy Inspector General if the records were initially denied by the Counsel to the Inspector General, ordinarily shall send an acknowledgement letter to the requester which shall confirm receipt of the requester’s appeal.

(c) Upon receipt of an appeal involving records initially denied on the basis of FOIA exemption (b)(1), the
records shall be forwarded to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Security (DAS) for a declassification review. The DAS may overrule previous
classification determinations in whole or in part if continued protection in the interest of national security is no longer required, or no longer required at the
same level. The DAS shall advise the AGC-Admin, the General Counsel, Counsel to the Inspector General, or Deputy Inspector General, as appropriate, of his or her decision.

* * * * *

■ 12. Section 4.11 is amended by:

■ a. Revising paragraphs (a), (b)(2) through (4), (b)(6) and (7), (c)(2), (c)(3)(ii), (c)(4), (d)(1) and paragraph (i);

■ b. Adding paragraphs (d)(6) and (d)(7);

■ c. Revising paragraph (e);

■ d. Redesignating paragraphs (j) and (k) as (k) and (l); and

■ e. Adding a new paragraph (j).

The revisions and additions read as
follows:

**§ 4.11 Fees.**

(a) In general. Components shall charge fees for processing requests
under the FOIA in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section, except where fees are limited under paragraph (d) of this section or when a waiver or reduction is granted under paragraph (k) of this section. A component shall collect all applicable fees before processing a request if a component determines that advance payment is required in accordance with paragraphs (i)(2) and (i)(3) of this section. If advance payment of fees is not required, a component shall collect all applicable fees before sending copies of requested records to a requester. Requesters must pay fees by check or money order made payable to the Treasury of the United

States.

(b) * * * (2) Direct costs means those expenses a component incurs in searching for and duplicating (and, in the case of commercial use requests, reviewing) records to respond to a FOIA request. Direct costs include, for example, the salary of the employee performing the work (the basic rate of pay for the employee, plus 16% of that rate to cover benefits) and the cost of operating computers and other electronic equipment, such as photocopiers and
scanners. Direct costs do not include overhead expenses such as the costs of space, heating, or lighting of the facility in which the service is performed.

(3) Duplication means the making of a copy of a record, or of the information contained in it, necessary to respond to a FOIA request. Copies may take the form of paper, microform, audiovisual materials, or electronic records, among others. A component shall honor a requester’s specified preference of form
or format of disclosure if the record is readily reproducible with reasonable efforts in the requested form or format.

(4) Educational institution means a preschool, a public or private elementary or secondary school, an institution of undergraduate higher education, an institution of graduate higher education, an institution of professional education, or an institution of vocational education, that operates a program of scholarly research. A requester in this fee category must show that the request is authorized by, and is made under the auspices of, an
educational institution and that the records are not sought for a commercial use, but rather are sought to further scholarly research. To fall within this fee category, a request must serve the scholarly research goal of the institution rather than an individual research goal.

Example 1. A request from a professor of geology at a university for records relating to soil erosion, written on letterhead of the Department of Geology, would be presumed to be from an
educational institution. Example 2. A request from the same professor of geology seeking drug information from the Food and Drug
Administration in furtherance of a murder mystery he is writing would not be presumed to be an institutional request, regardless of whether it was
written on institutional letterhead.

Example 3. A student who makes a request in furtherance of the completion
of a course of instruction would be presumed to be carrying out an individual research goal, rather than a scholarly research goal of the institution, and would not qualify as part of this fee category.

* * * * *

(6) Representative of the news media, or news media requester, means any person or entity organized and operated to publish or broadcast news to the public that actively gathers information of potential interest to a segment of the public, uses its editorial skills to turn the raw materials into a distinct work,
and distributes that work to an
audience. The term ‘‘news’’ means
information that is about current events
or that would be of current interest to the public. Examples of news-media
entities are television or radio stations broadcasting to the public at-large and publishers of periodicals that
disseminate ‘‘news’’ and make their products available through a variety of means to the general public including news organizations that disseminate solely on the Internet. To be in this category, a requester must not be seeking the requested records for a commercial use. A request for records that supports the news-dissemination function of the requester shall not be
considered to be for a commercial use. A freelance journalist shall be regarded as working for a news-media entity if the journalist can demonstrate a solid basis for expecting publication through that entity, whether or not the journalist is actually employed by the entity. A publication contract would be the clearest proof, but components shall also look to the past publication record of a requester in making this determination. A component’s decision to grant a requester media status will be made on a case-by-case basis based upon the requester’s intended use of the
material.

(7) Review means the examination of a record located in response to a request in order to determine whether any portion of it is exempt from disclosure. Review time includes processing any record for disclosure, such as doing all that is necessary to prepare the record for disclosure, including the process of redacting it and marking any applicable


### 62563 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 202 / Monday, October 20, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

exemptions. Review costs are recoverable even if a record ultimately

is not disclosed. Review time includes time spent obtaining and considering any formal objection to disclosure made by a business submitter under § 4.9, but does not include time spent resolving general legal or policy issues regarding the application of exemptions.

* * * * * (c) * * *

(2) Uniform fee schedule.

Service Rate

(i) Manual search ...................................................................................... Actual salary rate of employee conducting review, plus 16 percent of salary rate. (ii) Computerized search .......................................................................... Actual direct cost, including operator time. (iii) Review of records ............................................................................... Actual salary rate of employee involved, plus 16 percent of salary rate. (iv) Duplication of records: (A) Paper copy reproduction ............................................................. $.08 per page. (B) Other reproduction (e.g., converting paper into an electronic

format (e.g., scanning), computer disk or printout, or other electronically-formatted reproduction (e.g., uploading records made available to the requester into FOIAonline)). Actual direct cost, including operator time.

(3) * * * (ii) For computer searches of records, requesters will be charged the direct costs of conducting the search, although certain requesters (as provided in paragraph (d)(1) of this section) will be charged no search fee and certain other requesters (as provided in paragraph (d)(3) of this section) are entitled to the cost equivalent of two hours of manual search time without charge. These direct
costs will include the costs of the operator/programmer salary apportionable to the search and any other tangible direct costs associated with a computer search.

(4) Duplication. Duplication fees shall be charged to all requesters, subject to the limitations of paragraph (d) of this section. A component shall honor a requester’s preference for receiving a record in a particular form or format where it is readily producible by the component in the form or format requested. For either a photocopy or a computer-generated printout of a record (no more than one copy of which need be supplied), the fee shall be $.08 per page. Requesters may reduce costs by specifying double-sided duplication, except where this is technically not
feasible. For electronic forms ofduplication, other than a computergenerated printout, components will charge the direct costs of that duplication. Such direct costs will include the costs of the requested electronic medium on which the copy is to be made and the actual operator time and computer resource usage required to produce the copy, to the extent they
can be determined.

* * * * *

(d) * * * (1) No search fees shall be charged for requests from educational institutions, non-commercial scientific institutions, or representatives of the news media.

* * * * * (6) No search fees shall be charged to a FOIA requester when a component does not comply with the statutory time limits at 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6) in which to respond to a request, unless unusual or exceptional circumstances (as those terms are defined by the FOIA) apply to the processing of the request.

(7) No duplication fees shall be charged to requesters in the fee category of a representative of the news media or
an educational or noncommercial scientific institution when a component does not comply with the statutory time limits at 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6) in which to respond to a request, unless unusual or exceptional circumstances (as those terms are defined by the FOIA) apply to the processing of the request.

(e) Notice of anticipated fees in excess of $20.00. (1) When a component
determines or estimates that the fees for processing a FOIA request will total more than $20.00 or total more than the amount the requester indicated a willingness to pay, the component shall notify the requester of the actual or estimated amount of the fees, unless the requester has stated in writing a willingness to pay fees as high as those anticipated. If only a portion of the fee can be estimated readily, the component shall advise the requester that the estimated fee may be only a portion of
the total fee. A notice under this paragraph shall offer the requester an opportunity to discuss the matter with Departmental personnel in order to modify the request in an effort to meet the requester’s needs at a lower cost.

(2) When a requester has been notified
that the actual or estimated fees will amount to more than $20.00, or amount to more than the amount the requester indicated a willingness to pay, the component will do no further work on the request until the requester agrees in writing to pay the actual or estimated total fee. The component will toll the processing of the request while it notifies the requester of the actual or
estimated amount of fees and this time will be excluded from the twenty (20) working day time limit (as specified in § 4.6(b)). The requester’s agreement to pay fees must be made in writing, must designate an exact dollar amount the requester is willing to pay, and must be received within 30 calendar days from
the date of the notification of the fee estimate. If the requester fails to submit an agreement to pay the anticipated fees within 30 calendar days from the date of the component’s fee notice, the component will presume that the requester is no longer interested and notify the requester that the request will
be closed.

* * * * *

(i) Advance payments. (1) For requests other than those described in paragraphs (i)(2) and (3) of this section, a component shall not require the requester to make an advance payment (i.e., a payment made before a component begins to process or continues work on a request). Payment owed for work already completed (i.e., a pre-payment before copies of responsive records are sent to a requester) is not an advance payment.

(2) When a component determines or
estimates that the total fee for processing a FOIA request will be $250.00 or more, the component shall notify the requester of the actual or estimated fee and require the requester to make an advance payment of the entire anticipated fee before beginning to process the request. A notice under this paragraph shall offer the requester an opportunity to discuss the matter with Departmental personnel in order to modify the request in an effort to meet the requester’s needs at a lower cost.

(3) When a requester has previously failed to pay a properly charged FOIA fee to any component or other Federal


### 62564 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 202 / Monday, October 20, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

agency within 30 calendar days of the date of billing, the component shall notify the requester that he or she is required to pay the full amount due, plus any applicable interest, and to make an advance payment of the full amount of any anticipated fee, before the component begins to process a new request or continues to process a pending request from that requester. A notice under this paragraph shall offer the requester an opportunity to discuss the matter with Departmental personnel in order to modify the request in an effort to meet the requester’s needs at a
lower cost.

(4) When the component requires advance payment or payment due under paragraphs (i)(2) and (i)(3) of this section, the component will not further process the request until the required payment is made. The component will toll the processing of the request while it notifies the requester of the advanced payment due and this time will be excluded from the twenty (20) working day time limit (as specified in § 4.6(b)). If the requester does not pay the advance payment within 30 calendar days from the date of the component’s fee notice, the component will presume that the requester is no longer interested and notify the requester that the request
will be closed.

(j) Tolling. When necessary for the component to clarify issues regarding fee assessment with the FOIA requester, the time limit for responding to the FOIA request is tolled until the component resolves such issues with the requester.

* * * * *

■ 13. Section 4.25 is amended by revising paragraph (g)(1) to read as
follows:

**§ 4.25 Disclosure of requested records to**

**individuals.**

* * * * *

(g) * * *

(1) Grounds. Access by an individual to a record that pertains to that individual will be denied only upon a determination by the Privacy Officer
that:

(i) The record is exempt under § 4.33 or 4.34, or exempt by determination of another agency publishing notice of the system of records, as described in § 4.23(f);

(ii) The record is information compiled in reasonable anticipation of a civil action or proceeding;

(iii) The provisions of § 4.26 pertaining to medical records have been invoked; or (iv) The individual unreasonably has failed to comply with the procedural requirements of this part.

* * * * *

■ 14. Section 4.26 is revised to read as
follows:

**§ 4.26 Special procedures: Medical**

**records.**

When a request for access involves medical or psychological records, the records will be reviewed by the Department’s medical officer for a
determination on whether disclosure
would be harmful to the individual to whom they relate. If it is determined that disclosure would be harmful, the Department may refuse to disclose the records directly to the requester but
shall transmit them to a doctor authorized in writing by the individual
to whom the records relate to receive
the documents. If an individual refuses to provide written authorization to
release his or her medical records to a doctor, barring any applicable exemption, the Department shall give
the individual access to his or her records by means of a copy, provided without cost to the requester, sent registered mail, return receipt requested.

■ 15. Section 4.28 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(1)(ii) and (a)(2)
to read as follows:

**§ 4.28 Agency review of requests for**

**correction or amendment.**

(a) * * * (1) * * * (ii) If the Privacy Officer fails to send the acknowledgment within ten working days, as provided in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, the requester may ask the
Assistant General Counsel for Administration, or in the case of a request to the Office of the Inspector General, the Counsel to the Inspector General, to take corrective action. No failure of a Privacy Officer to send an acknowledgment shall confer administrative finality for purposes of judicial review.

(2) Promptly after acknowledging receipt of a request, or after receiving such further information as might have been requested, or after arriving at a decision within the ten working days, the Privacy Officer shall either:

(i) Make the requested correction or
amendment and advise the individual in writing of such action, providing either a copy of the corrected or amended record or, in cases in which a copy cannot be provided, a statement as to the means by which the correction or amendment was effected; or

(ii) Inform the individual in writing that his or her request is denied and provide the following information: (A) The Privacy Officer’s name and title or position;

(B) The date of the denial; (C) The reasons for the denial, including citation to the appropriate sections of the Act and this subpart; and

(D) The procedures for appeal of the denial as set forth in § 4.29, including
the address of the Assistant General Counsel for Administration, or in the case of a request to the Office of the Inspector General, the address of the Counsel to the Inspector General.

* * * * *

■ 16. Section 4.29 is amended by revising paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (e), (g) introductory text, (g)(1), (h), and (i) to
read as follows:

**§ 4.29 Appeal of initial adverse agency**

**determination on correction or amendment.**

(a) If a request for correction or amendment is denied initially under § 4.28, the individual may submit a written appeal within thirty calendar days of the date of the initial denial. The appeal must be received by the General Counsel, or by the Counsel to the Inspector General in the case of an appeal of an initial adverse determination by the Office of Inspector General, during normal business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday) within 30 calendar days of the date of the initial denial. Appeals arriving after normal
business hours will be deemed received on the next normal business day. If the 30th calendar day falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or a legal public holiday, an appeal received by 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, the next business day will be deemed timely.

(b)(1) An appeal from a request to a component other than the Office of the Inspector General should be addressed
to the Assistant General Counsel for Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 5875, 14th and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. An appeal should include the words ‘‘Privacy Act Appeal’’ at the top
of the letter and on the face of the envelope. An appeal not addressed and marked as provided herein will be so marked by Department personnel when it is so identified, and will be forwarded immediately to the Assistant General Counsel for Administration. An appeal which is not properly addressed by the
individual will not be deemed to have been ‘‘received’’ for purposes of measuring the time periods in this section until actual receipt by the
Assistant General Counsel for
Administration. In each instance when an appeal so forwarded is received, the
Assistant General Counsel for Administration shall notify the


### 62565 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 202 / Monday, October 20, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

individual that his or her appeal was improperly addressed and the date on which the appeal was received at the proper address.

(2) An appeal of an initial adverse
determination on correction or amendment by the Office of Inspector
General should be addressed to the Counsel to the Inspector General, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 7898C, 14th and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. An appeal should include the words ‘‘Privacy Act Appeal’’ at the top of the letter and on the face of the envelope. An appeal not addressed and marked as provided herein will be so marked by Department personnel when it is so identified, and will be forwarded immediately to the Counsel to the Inspector General. An appeal which is not properly addressed by the individual will not be deemed to have been ‘‘received’’ for purposes of measuring the time periods in this section until actual receipt by the Counsel to the Inspector General. In each instance when an appeal so forwarded is received, the Counsel to the Inspector General shall notify the individual that his or her appeal was improperly addressed and the date on which the appeal was received at the proper address.

(c) The individual’s appeal shall be signed by the individual, and shall
include a statement of the reasons for why the initial denial is believed to be in error, and the Department’s control number assigned to the request. The Privacy Act Officer who issued the
initial denial shall furnish to the
Assistant General Counsel for Administration, or in the case of an initial denial by the Office of the Inspector General, to the Counsel to the Inspector General, the record(s) the individual requests to be corrected or amended, and all correspondence between the Privacy Officer and the requester. Although the foregoing normally will comprise the entire record on appeal, the Assistant General Counsel for Administration, or in the case of an initial denial by the Office of the Inspector General, the Counsel to the Inspector General, may seek any additional information necessary to
ensure that the final determination is fair and equitable and, in such instances, disclose the additional
information to the individual to the greatest extent possible, and provide an opportunity for comment thereon.

* * * * *

(e) The Assistant General Counsel for Administration, or in the case of an initial denial by the Office of the Inspector General, the Counsel to the Inspector General, shall act upon the appeal and issue a final determination in writing not later than thirty working days (i.e., excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal public holidays) from the date on which the appeal is received, except
that the Assistant General Counsel for Administration, or in the case of an initial denial by the Office of the Inspector General, the Counsel to the Inspector General, may extend the thirty days upon deciding that a fair and equitable review cannot be made within that period, but only if the individual is advised in writing of the reason for the extension and the estimated date by
which a final determination will be
issued. The estimated date should not be later than the sixtieth day after receipt of the appeal unless unusual circumstances, as described in § 4.25(a),

are met.

* * * * *

(g) If the appeal is denied, the final
determination shall be transmitted promptly to the individual and state the
reasons for the denial. The notice of
final determination shall inform the
individual that:

(1) The individual has a right under
the Act to file with the Assistant General Counsel for Administration, or in the case of an initial denial by the Office of the Inspector General, the Counsel to the Inspector General, a
concise statement of reasons for disagreeing with the final determination. The statement ordinarily should not exceed one page and the Department reserves the right to reject an excessively lengthy statement. It should provide the Department control number assigned to the request, indicate
the date of the final determination and be signed by the individual. The
Assistant General Counsel for Administration, or in the case of an initial denial by the Office of the Inspector General, the Counsel to the Inspector General, shall acknowledge receipt of such statement and inform the
individual of the date on which it was received;

* * * * *

(h) In making the final determination,
the Assistant General Counsel for Administration, or in the case of an initial denial by the Office of the Inspector General, the Counsel to the Inspector General, shall employ the criteria set forth in § 4.28(c) and shall deny an appeal only on grounds set forth in § 4.28(e).

(i) If an appeal is partially granted and partially denied, the Assistant General Counsel for Administration, or in the case of an initial denial by the Office of the Inspector General, the Counsel to the Inspector General, shall follow the appropriate procedures of this section as to the records within the grant and the
records within the denial.

* * * * *

■ 17. Section 4.33 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) introductory text and (b)(1) to read as follows:

**§ 4.33 General exemptions.**

* * * * *

(b) The general exemptions determined to be necessary and proper with respect to systems of records maintained by the Department, including the parts of each system to be exempted, the provisions of the Act from which they are exempted, and the justification for the exemption, are as
follows:

(1) Individuals identified in Export

Transactions—COMMERCE/BIS–1. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), these records are hereby determined to be exempt from all provisions of the Act, except 5 U.S.C. 552a(b), (c)(1) and (2), (e)(4)(A) through (F), (e)(6), (7), (9), (10), and (11), and (i). These exemptions are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of the law enforcement activity, to protect confidential sources of information, to fulfill promises of confidentiality, to maintain the integrity of the law enforcement process, to avoid premature disclosure of the knowledge of criminal activity and the evidentiary bases of possible enforcement actions, to prevent interference with law enforcement proceedings, to avoid disclosure of investigative techniques, and to avoid endangering law enforcement personnel. Section 12(c) of the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended, also protects this
information from disclosure.

* * * * *

■ 18. Section 4.34 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(1), (b) introductory text, (b)(2)(i)(A), (b)(3)(i), and (b)(4)(i) to read as follows:

**§ 4.34 Specific exemptions.**

(a)(1) Certain systems of records under the Act that are maintained by the Department may occasionally contain material subject to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1), relating to national defense and foreign policy materials. The systems of records published in the Federal Register by the Department that are within this exemption are:

COMMERCE/BIS–1, COMMERCE/ ITA–2, COMMERCE/ITA–3, COMMERCE/NOAA–11, COMMERCE– PAT–TM–4, COMMERCE/DEPT–12, COMMERCE/DEPT–13, and
COMMERCE/DEPT–14.

* * * * *


### 62566 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 202 / Monday, October 20, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

(b) The specific exemptions determined to be necessary and proper with respect to systems of records maintained by the Department, including the parts of each system to be exempted, the provisions of the Act from which they are exempted, and the justification for the exemption, are as
follows:

(2)(i) * * * (A) Individuals identified in Export Administration compliance proceedings or investigations—COMMERCE/BIS–1, but only on condition that the general exemption claimed in § 4.33(b)(1) is held to be invalid;

* * * * *

(3)(i) Exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(4). The systems of records exempt, the sections of the Act from which exempted, and the reasons
therefor are as follows:

(A) Special Censuses, Surveys, and Other Studies—COMMECE/CENSUS–3;

(B) Economic Survey Collection— COMMERCE/CENSUS–4;

(C) Decennial Census Program— COMMERCE/CENSUS–5;

(D) Population Census Records for 1910 & All Subsequent Decennial Census—COMMERCE/CENSUS–6;

(E) Other Agency Surveys &
Reimbursable—COMMERCE/CENSUS–

7; (F) Statistical Administrative Records System—COMMERCE/CENSUS–8;

(G) Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics System—COMMERCE/ CENSUS–9; and

(H) Foreign Trade Statistics—
COMMERCE/CENSUS–12.

* * * * *

(4)(i) Exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5). The systems of records exempt (some only conditionally), the
sections of the Act from which exempted, and the reasons therefor are
as follows:

(A) Applications to U.S. Merchant Marine Academy (USMMA)— COMMERCE/MA–1;

(B) USMMA Midshipman Medical Files—COMMERCE/MA–17;

(C) USMMA Midshipman Personnel Files—COMMERCE/MA–18;

(D) USMMA Non-Appropriated Fund Employees—COMMERCE/MA–19;

(E) Applicants for the NOAA Corps— COMMERCE/NOAA–1;

(F) Commissioned Officer Official
Personnel Folders—COMMERCE/
NOAA–3;

(G) Conflict of Interest Records, Appointed Officials—COMMERCE/

DEPT–3

(H) Investigative and Inspection Records—COMMERCE/DEPT–12, but only on condition that the general exemption claimed in § 4.33(b)(3) is held to be valid;

(I) Investigative Records—Persons Within the Investigative Jurisdiction of the Department—COMMERCE/DEPT– 13; and

(J) Litigation, Claims, and Administrative Proceeding Records—
COMMERCE/DEPT–14.

* * * * *

■ 19. Appendix A to Part 4 is revised to
read as follows:

Appendix A to Part 4—Freedom of Information Public Inspection Facilities, and Addresses for Requests
for Records Under the Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act, and Requests for Correction or Amendment Under the Privacy Act

Each address listed below is the respective component’s mailing address for receipt and processing of requests for records under the Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act, for requests for correction or amendment under the Privacy Act and, unless otherwise noted, its public inspection facility for records available to the public under the Freedom of Information Act. Requests should be addressed to the component the requester

knows or has reason to believe has possession of, control over, or primary concern with the records sought. Otherwise, requests should be addressed to the Departmental FOIA Office identified in paragraph (1) of this appendix. The telephone and facsimile numbers for each component are included after its address, as well as email addresses for components that maintain an email address for the purposes of receiving of FOIA and Privacy Act requests. Records of components that are required to be made publicly available are available electronically either through the Department’s ‘‘Electronic FOIA Library’’ on the Department’s Web site, http:// www.doc.gov, as described in § 4.2(a), or the component’s separate online Electronic FOIA Library as indicated below. Components that maintain a public inspection facility are designated as such below. These public inspection facilities records are open to the public Monday through Friday (i.e., excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays) between 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. local time of the facility at issue. The Departmental Freedom of Information Act Officer is authorized to revise this appendix to reflect changes in the information contained in it. Any such revisions shall be posted on the Department’s ‘‘FOIA Home Page’’ link found at the Department’s Web
site, http://www.doc.gov.

(1) U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Privacy and Open Government, Departmental FOIA Office, 14th and Constitution Avenue NW., Mail Stop A300, Washington, DC 20230; Phone: (202) 482–3258; Fax: (202) 482–0827; Email: EFoia@doc.gov; FOIAonline: http:// foiaonline.regulations.gov. This component maintains an online Electronic FOIA Library through the Department’s Web site, http:// www.doc.gov. This online Electronic FOIA Library serves the Office of the Secretary, all other components of the Department not identified below, and those components identified below that do not have separate
online Electronic FOIA Libraries.

(2) Bureau of the Census, Policy Coordination Office, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 8H027, 4600 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, Maryland 20233; Ph.: (301) 763–6440; Fax: (301) 763–6239 (ATTN.: FOIA Office); Email: cemsus.efoia@

census.gov; FOIAonline: http:// foiaonline.regulations.gov. This component maintains a separate online Electronic FOIA Library through its Web site, http://

www.census.gov.

(3) Bureau of Economic Analysis/Economic and Statistics Administration, Office of the Under Secretary for Economic Affairs, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue NW., Mail Stop H4836, Washington, DC 20230; Ph.: (202) 482–5997; Fax: (202) 482–2889; Email: EFOIAESA@ doc.gov; FOIAonline: http:// foiaonline.regulations.gov. This component maintains a separate online Electronic FOIA Library through its Web site, http:// www.esa.doc.gov.

(4) Bureau of Industry and Security, Office of Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue NW., Mails Stop H6622, Washington, DC 20230; Ph.: (202) 482–0953; Fax: (202) 482– 0326; Email: efoiarequest@bis.doc.gov; FOIAonline: http:// foiaonline.regulations.gov. This component maintains a separate online Electronic FOIA Library through its Web site, http:// www.bis.doc.gov.

(5) Economic Development Administration, Office of the Chief Counsel, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and
Constitution Avenue NW., Room 7325, Washington, DC 20230; Ph.: (202) 482–3085; Fax: (202) 482–5671; FOIAonline: http:// foiaonline.regulations.gov. This component does not maintain a separate online Electronic FOIA Library, nor do any of the following Regional EDA offices.

(i) Atlanta Regional Office, EDA, U.S. Department of Commerce, 401 West Peachtree Street NW., Suite 1820, Atlanta, Georgia 30308; Ph.: (404) 730–3006.

(ii) Austin Regional Office, EDA, U.S. Department of Commerce, 504 Lavaca Street, Suite 1100, Austin, Texas 78701; Ph.: (512)

381–8165.

(iii) Chicago Regional Office, EDA, U.S. Department of Commerce, 111 North Canal Street, Suite 855, Chicago, Illinois 60606; Ph.: (312) 353–8143.

(iv) Denver Regional Office, EDA, U.S. Department of Commerce, 410 17th Street, Suite 250, Denver, Colorado 80202; Ph.: (303)

844–4404.

(v) Philadelphia Regional Office, EDA, U.S. Department of Commerce, Curtis Center, Suite 140 South, 601 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106; Ph.: (215)

597–7896.

(vi) Seattle Regional Office, EDA, U.S. Department of Commerce, Jackson Federal Building, Room 1890, 915 Second Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98174; Ph.: (206) 220–

7663.

(6) International Trade Administration, Office of Strategic Resources, U.S.


### 62567 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 202 / Monday, October 20, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

1 The foregoing officials have sole authority under § 4.7(c) to deny requests for records in any respect, including, for example, denying requests for

reduction or waiver of fees. Department of Commerce, 14th and
Constitution Avenue NW., Room 40003, Washington, DC 20230; Ph.: (202) 482–7937; Fax: (202) 482–1584; Email: foia@trade.gov; FOIAonline: http:// foiaonline.regulations.gov. This component does not maintain a separate online Electronic FOIA Library.

(7) Minority Business Development Agency, Office of Administration and Employee Support Services, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue NW., Room 5092, Washington, DC 20230; Ph.: (202) 482–2419; Fax: (202) 482–2500;

Email: FOIA@mbda.gov; FOIAonline: http:// foiaonline.regulations.gov. This component maintains a separate online Electronic FOIA Library through its Web site, http:// www.mbda.gov.

(8) National Institute of Standards and Technology, Management and Organization Office, U.S. Department of Commerce, 100 Bureau Drive, Mail Stop 1710, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899–1710; Ph.: (301) 975–4054; Fax: (301) 975–5301; Email: foia@nist.gov; FOIAonline: http:// foiaonline.regulations.gov. This component maintains a separate public inspection facility at the Administration Building, Gaithersburg, Maryland. Please call (301) 975–4054 for inspection facility directions and hours. This component does not maintain a separate online Electronic FOIA Library.

(9) National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1315 East-West Highway (SSMC3), Room 9719, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910; Ph.: (301) 628–5658; Fax: (301) 713–1169; Email: foia@noaa.gov; FOIAonline: http:// foiaonline.regulations.gov. This component maintains a separate online Electronic FOIA Library through its Web site, http://

www.noaa.gov.

(10) National Technical Information Service, Office of the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5301 Shawnee Road, Room 227, Alexandria, Virginia 22312; Ph.: (703) 605–6710; Fax: (703) 605–6764; FOIAonline: http:// foiaonline.regulations.gov. This component maintains a separate online Electronic FOIA Library through its Web site, http:// www.ntis.gov.

(11) National Telecommunications and Information Administration, Office of the Chief Counsel, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue NW., Mail Stop 4713, Washington, DC 20230; Ph.: (202) 482–1816; Fax: (202) 501–8013;

Email: eFOIA@NTIA.doc.gov; FOIAonline: http://foiaonline.regulations.gov. This component does not maintain a separate online Electronic FOIA Library.

(12) Office of Inspector General, FOIA and Records Management Specialist, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and
Constitution Avenue NW., Room 7099C, Washington, DC 20230; Ph.: (202) 482–3470; Fax: (202) 501–7921; Email: FOIA@ oig.doc.gov; FOIAonline: http:// foiaonline.regulations.gov. This component maintains a separate online Electronic FOIA Library through its Web site, http:// www.oig.doc.gov. ■ 20. Appendix B to Part 4 is revised to
read as follows:

Appendix B to Part 4—Officials Authorized To Deny Requests for
Records Under the Freedom of Information Act, and Requests for Records and Requests for Correction or Amendment Under the Privacy Act

The officials of the Department listed below and their superiors have authority, with respect to the records for which each is responsible, to deny requests for records under the FOIA, 1 and requests for records and requests for correction or amendment under the PA. In addition, the Departmental

Freedom of Information Officer and the

Freedom of Information Officer for the Office of the Secretary have the foregoing FOIA and PA denial authority for all records of the Department. The Departmental Freedom of Information Officer is authorized to assign that authority, on a case-by-case basis only, to any of the officials listed below, if the records responsive to a request include

records for which more than one official listed below is responsible. The Departmental Freedom of Information Officer is authorized to revise this appendix to reflect changes in designation of denial officials. Any such revisions shall be posted on the Department’s ‘‘FOIA Home Page’’ link found at the Department’s Web site, http:// www.doc.gov.

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY
Office of the Secretary: Executive Secretary;

Freedom of Information Officer Office of Business Liaison: Director Office of Public Affairs: Director; Deputy

Director; Press Secretary; Deputy Press Secretary Assistant Secretary for Legislative and

Intergovernmental Affairs; Deputy Assistant Secretary for Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs Office of Inspector General: Freedom of

Information Act Officer Office of the General Counsel: Deputy

General Counsel; Assistant General

Counsel for Administration Office of Executive Support: Director Office of Chief Information Officer: Director

ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR

ADMINISTRATION
Office of Civil Rights: Director Office of Budget: Director Office of Privacy and Open Government:

Director Departmental Freedom of

Information Officer Office of Program Evaluation and Risk

Management: Director Office of Financial Management: Director Office of Human Resources Management:

Director; Deputy Director Office of Administrative Services: Director Office of Security: Director Office of Acquisition Management: Director Office of Acquisition Services: Director Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business

Utilization: Director

BUREAU OF INDUSTRY AND SECURITY
Under Secretary Deputy Under Secretary Director, Office of Administration Director, Office of Planning, Evaluation and

Management Assistant Secretary for Export Administration Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export

Administration Director, Office of Strategic Industries and

Economic Security Director, Office of Nonproliferation Controls

and Treaty Compliance Director, Office of Exporter Services Assistant Secretary for Export Enforcement Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export

Enforcement Director, Office of Export Enforcement Director, Office of Enforcement Analysis Director, Office of Antiboycott Compliance

ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS

ADMINISTRATION
Office of Administration: Director Bureau of Economic Analysis: Director Bureau of the Census: Freedom of

Information Act Officer

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

ADMINISTRATION

Freedom of Information Officer

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

ADMINISTRATION

Executive Administration

Under Secretary for International Trade Deputy Under Secretary for International

Trade

Chief Counsel for International Trade

Chief Counsel for Enforcement and

Compliance Trade Promotion Coordinating Committee

Secretariat Director, Office of Public Affairs Director, Office of Legislative and

Intergovernmental Affairs

Chief Information Officer Deputy Chief Information Officer Chief Administrative Officer, Office of the

Chief Information Officer

Chief Financial and Administration Officer Deputy Chief Financial Administrative

Officer Director, Budget Division Director, Financial Management and

Administrative Oversight Division Director, Business Operations and Policy

Compliance Division Director, Performance Management and

Employee Programs Division

Freedom of Information Act Officer

Enforcement and Compliance

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and

Compliance Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement

and Compliance Director, Office of Foreign Trade Zones Staff Director, Office of Operations Support Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping

and Countervailing Duty Operations Executive Director, Antidumping and

Countervailing Duty Operations


### 62568 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 202 / Monday, October 20, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

Director, Office of Antidumping and

Countervailing Duty Enforcement I Director, Office of Antidumping and

Countervailing Duty Enforcement II Director, Office of Antidumping and

Countervailing Duty Enforcement III Director, Office of Antidumping and

Countervailing Duty Enforcement IV Director, Office of Antidumping and

Countervailing Duty Enforcement V Director, Office of Antidumping and

Countervailing Duty Enforcement VI Director, Office of Antidumping and

Countervailing Duty Enforcement VII Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy &

Negotiations Director, Office of Trade Agreements

Negotiations and Compliance Director, Office of Accounting Director, Office of Policy

Global Markets

Assistant Secretary of Global Markets and

Director General for the US&FCS Deputy Director General Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary Executive Director, Advocacy Center Director, Business Information and

Technology Office Director, Global Knowledge Center Director, Office of Budget Director, Office of Foreign Service Human

Capital Director, Office of Strategic Planning Director, Office of Administrative Services Executive Director, SelectUSA Deputy Assistant Secretary for U.S. Field

National U.S. Field Director Deputy Assistant Secretary for Asia

Executive Director for Asia Director, Office of the ASEAN and Pacific

Basin Director, Office of East Asia and APEC Director, Office of South Asia Deputy Assistant Secretary for China, Hong

Kong, and Mongolia Executive Director for China, Hong Kong, and

Mongolia Director, Office of China, Hong Kong, and

Mongolia Deputy Assistant Secretary for Western

Hemispheres Executive Director for Western Hemispheres Director, Office of North and Central America Director, Office of South America Deputy Assistant Secretary for Europe,

Middle East, and Africa Executive Deputy Assistant Secretary for

Europe, Middle East, and Africa Executive Director for Europe and Eurasia Director, Office of Europe Country Affairs Director, Office of the European Union Director, Office of Russia, Ukraine, and

Eurasia
Executive Director for Africa and Middle East Director, Office of the Middle East and North

Africa Director, Office of Sub-Saharan Africa

Industry and Analysis

Assistant Secretary for Industry and Analysis Deputy Assistant Secretary for Industry and

Analysis Trade Agreements Secretariat Executive Director, Office of Trade Programs

and Strategic Partnerships Director, Trade Promotion Programs Director, Strategic Partnerships Director, Office of Advisory Committees and

Industry Outreach Director, Office of Planning, Coordination

and Management Deputy Assistant Secretary for Services Director, Office of Financial and Insurance

Industries Director, Office of Digital Service Industries Director, Office of Supply Chain, Professional

and Business Services

Executive Director for National Travel and

Tourism Office Director, Office of Travel and Tourism

Industries Deputy Assistant Secretary for Trade Policy

and Analysis Director, Office of Standards and Investment

Policy Director, Office of Trade and Economic

Analysis Director, Office of Trade Negotiations and

Analysis Director, Office of Intellectual Property

Rights Deputy Assistant Secretary for Manufacturing Director, Office of Energy and Environmental

Industries Director, Office of Transportation and

Machinery Director, Office of Health and Information

Technologies Deputy Assistant Secretary for Textiles,

Consumer Goods, and Materials Director, Office of Textiles and Appeal Director, Office of Materials Director, Office of Consumer Goods

MINORITY BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT

AGENCY

Chief Counsel

Freedom of Information Officer

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS

AND TECNOLOGY
Chief, Management and Organization Office

NIST Counsel

NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC

ADMINISTRATION
Under Secretary Deputy Under Secretary for Operations Chief, Resource and Operations Management Director, Office of Communications and

External Affairs Director, Office of Marine and Aviation

Operations
General Counsel Deputy General Counsel

Assistant Administrator for National Ocean

Services Deputy Assistant Administrator for National

Ocean Services
Assistant Administrator for National Marine

Fisheries Service Deputy Assistant Administrator for

Operations for National Marine Fisheries

Service Deputy Assistant Administrator for

Regulatory Programs for National Marine

Fisheries Service

Assistant Administrator for National Weather

Services Deputy Assistant Administrator for National

Weather Services Assistant Administrator for National Environmental Satellite, Data, and

Information Service Deputy Assistant Administrator for National

Environmental Satellite, Data, and

Information Service

Assistant Administrator for Oceanic and

Atmospheric Research Deputy Assistant Administrator for Programs

& Administration (Oceanic and Atmospheric Research) Assistant Administrator for Program,

Planning and Integration

Chief Administrative Officer

Chief Financial Officer

Chief Information Officer Director, Acquisition and Grants Office Deputy Director, Acquisition and Grants

Office Head of Contracting Offices, Acquisition and

Grants Office Director, Workforce Management Office

Senior Advisor for International Affairs Director, Office of Legislation &

Intergovernmental Affairs

Freedom of Information Officer

NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION

SERVICE

Director Deputy Director
Chief Financial Officer/Associate Director for

Finance and Administration

NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND

INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION

Deputy Assistant Secretary
Chief Counsel Deputy Chief Counsel

[FR Doc. 2014–24598 Filed 10–17–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3510–17–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND**
**SECURITY**

**Coast Guard**

**33 CFR Part 110**

**[Docket Number USCG–2013–0819]**

**RIN 1625–AA01**

**Anchorage; Ashley River Anchorage, Ashley River, Charleston, SC** 

**AGENCY :**  Coast Guard, DHS.

**ACTION :**  Final rule.

**SUMMARY :**  The Coast Guard is modifying the special anchorage area located on the Ashley River, in Charleston, SC. This change is necessary to accommodate the expansion of the Charleston City Marina and to meet special anchorage area requirements. This change will ensure that there is sufficient space to accommodate vessels desiring to anchor in the area, while allowing a sufficient buffer between the federal channel and special anchorage.

**DATES :**  This rule is effective November

19, 2014.