alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Department of Environmental Quality 

To protect, conserve and enhance the quality of Wyoming's
 

environment for the benefit of current and future generations.
 

Dave Freudenthal, Governor John Corra, Director
 

December 7,2007 

.., Mr. Robbie Roberts 

Regional Administrator 

USEPA Region 8 

1595 Wynkoop Street 

Denver, CO 80202-1129 

Dear Mr. Roberts: 

On May 3, 2007, the State of Wyoming submitted a 110(a)(2)(D)(i) Transport State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) to EPA Region 8. The purpose of this SIP was to address emissions 

that affect other states through interstate transport. In preparing this SIP, the State followed the 

August 15,2006 EPA guidance as well as the supplement issued on September 11, 2006. On 

October 2, 2007, William Harnett, Director of the Air Quality Policy Division for EPA, issued 

further instruction on a matter related to these 110 Transport SIPs, that States must certify that 

they have the basic SIP "infrastructure" elements in place for the 1997 8-hour ozone and fine 

particulate matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Since EPA must make a 

determination on whether states have made complete submissions by December 15, 2007 with 

respect to the 8-hour ozone NAAQS, the State of Wyoming has made a determination that the 

existing SIP contains all of the necessary provisions to address requirements for the 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS and hereby certifies that the existing Wyoming SIP is adequate. 

If you have any questions concerning this letter, please feel free to contact Mr. David A. 

Finley at (307) 777-7391. 

Sincerely, 

irector 

It~{ ~' &~---- V.Corra
 

Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality
 RECEIVED 

cc:	 David A. Finley, AQD Administrator DEC 11 2001 

Christine Anderson, AQD USEPA RA'S OFFICE 

Herschler Building • 122 West 25th Street • Cheyenne, WY 82002 • http://deq.state.wy.us 

ADMIN/OUTREACH ABANDONED MINES AIR QUALITY INDUSTRIAL SITING LAND QUALITY SOLID & HAZ. WASTE WATER QUALITY 

(307) 777-7937 (307) 777-6145 (307) 777-7391 (307) 777-7369 (307) 777-7756 (307) 777-7752 (307) 777-7781 

FAX 777-3610 FAX 777-6462 FAX 777-5616 FAX 777-5973 FAX 777-5864 FAX 777-5973 FAX 777-5973
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 25148]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10326]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Friday, May 18, 2012.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance, Enforcement Matters and a Rule 
Enforcement Review. In the event that the times or dates of these or 
any future meetings change, an announcement of the change, along with 
the new time and place of the meeting will be posted on the 
Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-10326 Filed 4-25-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Rafael ROMERO-CARRENO, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40015 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed January 4, 2018

*839Paula Camille Offenhauser,. Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Deborah Rose Garcia, Corpus Christi, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and ELROD and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Rafael Romero-Carreno appeals the 82-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for harboring illegal aliens within the United States for financial gain. Romero-Carreno argues that the district court erred in applying the' nine-level enhancement for harboring more than 100 aliens, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2Ll.l(b)(2)(C). He contends that the district court relied on. the presentence report (PSR) in imposing the enhancement and that the PSR contained unreliable information. We review this issue for clear error. *See United States v. Betancourt,*422 F.3d 240, 244-45 (5th Cir. 2005).

The district court, relying on information in the PSR and sustaining in part the objections to the PSR, found that the instant offense involved at least 181 aliens. In determining this number, the PSR and the district court relied on ledgers recovered from Romero-Carreno’s residence that listed the names of aliens housed at the residence on certain dates. The main thrust of Romero-Carreno’s argument is that the Government never established that he owned or authored the ledgers in question. However, the PSR had already established, based on Romero-Carreno’s own admissions, that he was the leader of the criminal enterprise to harbor aliens, that he was responsible for delegating responsibilities, and that the aliens were housed at his residence. The defendant has the burden of presenting evidence to show that the facts contained in the PSR are inaccurate or materially untrue. *United States v. Alaniz,*726 F.3d 586, 619 (5th Cir. 2013), Given the lack of rebuttal evidence provided by Romero-Carreno as to the number of illegal aliens harbored, the PSR’s calculation, as modified by the district court, was not implausible and therefore not clearly erroneous. *See id.; see also Betancourt,*422 F.3d at 247.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 11

COMPUTATION OF NET EARNINGS AND SHARES
USED IN ARRIVING AT NET EARNINGS PER SHARE
THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       Primary and Fully Diluted
                                       -------------------------

                                          Three Months Ended       Six Months Ended
                                           December 31, 1995       December 31, 1995
                                           -----------------       -----------------
<S>                                           <C>                      <C>
Earnings:
--------

Net earnings                                  $   983,453              1,903,674

Less: Dividends on preferred stock                     --                     --
                                              -----------              ---------

Net earnings applicable to common stock       $   983,453              1,903,674
                                              -----------              ---------

Computation of weighted number of
  shares outstanding:
---------------------------------------

Shares outstanding on a diluted basis           5,453,633              5,453,633
                                              ===========              =========
</TABLE>
cg386b.htm


Exhibit 10.2






FIRST AMENDMENT TO BONUS AGREEMENT


 







This First Amendment to Bonus Agreement (this “Amendment”), effective as of March 26, 2014, is made by and between Hennessy Advisors, Inc. and Daniel B. Steadman.


 







RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, the parties previously entered into a Bonus Agreement, dated as of August 28, 2006 (the “Bonus Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, the parties now desire to amend the Bonus Agreement as provided for herein.


 


AGREEMENT


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1.  Section 1 of the Bonus Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the phrase “the least of” with the phrase “the greatest of”.


 


2.  Except as herein modified or amended, the terms and conditions of the Bonus Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.


 


3.  This Amendment may be executed by facsimile signature and a facsimile signature shall constitute an original for all purposes.


 


[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.]











  





  











  








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each party has caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the date first written above.


 



	  	
HENNESSY ADVISORS, INC.


 


 


By:              /s/ Neil J. Hennessy                                                                


Name:        Neil J. Hennessy


Title:          President, CEO, and Chairman of the Board


 


 


	  	
 


 


/s/ Daniel B. Steadman                                                                              


Daniel B. Steadman


 







 


 


 


 


 


 




Signature Page to First Amendment to Bonus Agreement
No. 11-1294.

#### Republic of Iraq *v.*Wye Oak Technology, Inc.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1


                    NATIONAL INSURANCE GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES

                     COMPUTATION OF WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES
                       OUTSTANDING AND EARNINGS PER SHARE
         (in thousands of dollars except share and per share amounts)
                                   (unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                     SECOND QUARTER                SIX MONTHS
                               -------------------------    -------------------------
                                   1997          1996           1997         1996
                               -----------   -----------    -----------  ------------
<S>                              <C>           <C>            <C>           <C>      
Actual common shares
outstanding                      3,896,937     4,679,697      3,896,937     4,679,697

Weighted average common
shares issued upon exercise
of stock options                    12,956           245         12,892        11,311

Common shares issuable under
outstanding stock
Options                             79,831             -         79,831             -

Total weighted average
Shares outstanding               3,989,724     4,679,942      3,989,660     4,691,008
                               ===========   ===========    ===========   ===========

Net income (loss)              $       838   $      (857)   $     1,640   $      (708)
                               ===========   ===========    ===========   ===========

Net income (loss) per share    $      0.21   $     (0.18)   $      0.41   $     (0.15)
                               ===========   ===========    ===========   ===========
</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San An tonio, Texas** 

July 18, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00300

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.J.M. AND H.J.M., CHILDREN

,

From the 83rd Judicial District Court, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 29724 Honorable Sergio J. Gonzalez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s brief is currently due July 23, 2014. On July 15, 2014, appellant filed a motion for

extension of time to file the brief. The basis for the motion is the assertion that the reporter’s record, which was filed in this court by Ms. Patricia Abeyta , is incomplete and/or defective. Appellant provided

Ms. Abeyta with a letter pointing out those portions of the record that are missing. Appellant has requested that the reporter file a corrected reporter’s record that includes all of the testimony and

exhibits. We have reviewed the reporter’s record and find appellant is correct

– the reporter’s record is incomp lete. Accordingly, we ORDER the court reporter, Ms. Patricia Abeyta , to file a complete, proper reporter’s record with this court on or before August 18, 2014

. The reporter is advised that no extensions of time to file the record will be granted absent wr itten proof of extraordinary circumstances. As for appellant’s brief, we DENY AS MOOT the motion to extend time to file appellant’s brief. Because the complete reporter’s record has not been filed, appellant’s brief is not yet due. Appellant’s

brief wil l be due thirty days after the date the reporter filed the complete reporter’s record in this court. We strongly urge the reporter to ensure the record is complete and accurate, and we suggest that appellant

review the record when it is filed to ensure it is complete.

We order the clerk of this court to serve this order on all counsel, the court reporter

– Patricia Abeyta , and the trial court.

___________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have here unto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on

this 18th day of July, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# C_2021079EN.01003501.xml

| 8.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/35

---

Action brought on 16 January 2021 — Be Smart v Commission

(Case T-18/21)

(2021/C 79/44)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Be Smart Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: F. Satta, G. Roberti, A. Romano and I. Perego, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | declare that the Commission has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 107 and 108 TFEU, Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 12(1) and Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) No 2015/1589, by failing to take a decision under Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 2015/1589, in particular to initiate proceedings pursuant to Article 108(2) TFEU, in connection with the complaint lodged by the applicant on 15 October 2014 (SA.39639); |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the Commission has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 107 and 108 TFEU, Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 12(1) and Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) No 2015/1589, by failing to take a decision under Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 2015/1589, in particular to initiate proceedings pursuant to Article 108(2) TFEU, in connection with the complaint lodged by the applicant on 15 October 2014 (SA.39639);

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The present action is based on Article 265 TFEU and seeks to obtain a declaration that the Commission unlawfully failed to take a position on the complaint lodged by Be Smart S.r.l. on 15 October 2014, registered under number SA.39639, concerning two unlawful State aid measures in favour of the Consorzio Interuniversitario Cineca.

In support of its action, the applicant claims that the Commission failed to fulfil its obligation to act, which arises under the provisions regarding unlawful State aid, by failing to take action after receiving the invitation to act and not adopting a position on the complaint lodged on 15 October 2014. It also failed to observe the fundamental principle of good administration laid down in Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

---
# Iris Oifigiúil C NaN/25 B

| | ISSN 1977-107X |
| --- | --- |
| Iris Oifigiúil
  an Aontais Eorpaigh | Eagrán Speisialta (
  *1) |
| | |
| An t-eagrán Gaeilge | Faisnéis agus Fógraí | 6125 Bealtaine 2018 |

ISSN 1977-107X

Iris Oifigiúil

an Aontais Eorpaigh

Eagrán Speisialta (
  *1)

*1

An t-eagrán Gaeilge

Faisnéis agus Fógraí

6125 Bealtaine 2018

---

| Clár | Leathanach |
| --- | --- |
| | Ceartúcháin |
| | Ceartúchán ar fhógra folúntais PE/197/S ( IO C 144 A, 25.4.2018 ) | 1 |

Clár

Leathanach

Ceartúcháin

Ceartúchán ar fhógra folúntais PE/197/S ( IO C 144 A, 25.4.2018 )

( IO C 144 A, 25.4.2018 )

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (*1)   Faoin tagairt C 179 A a foilsíodh ábhar an eagráin seo i dteangacha oifigiúla eile an Aontais Eorpaigh. |

---

(*1)   Faoin tagairt C 179 A a foilsíodh ábhar an eagráin seo i dteangacha oifigiúla eile an Aontais Eorpaigh.

*1

| GA | |
| --- | --- |

GA

---

Ceartúcháin

| 25.5.2018 | GA | Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh | 1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2018

GA

Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh

1

---

Ceartúchán ar fhógra folúntais PE/197/S

(
  Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh C 144 A Eagrán Speisialta Gaeilge an 25 Aibreán 2018
  )

Ar leathanach 1:

in ionad:

“Tá nós imeachta roghnúcháin á eagrú ag Parlaimint na hEorpa ar bhonn cáilíochtaí agus trialacha chun liosta d’iarrthóirí oiriúnacha a bhunú don phost seo a leanas:”,

léitear:

léitear:

“Tá próiseas roghnúcháin á eagrú ag Parlaimint na hEorpa ar bhonn cáilíochtaí agus trialacha chun liosta d’iarrthóirí oiriúnacha a bhunú do phoist san fheidhm seo a leanas:”.

Ar leathanach 2, faoi cheannteideal A. 1, “Faisnéis Ghinearálta”, an chéad mhír:

Ar leathanach 2, faoi cheannteideal A. 1, “Faisnéis Ghinearálta”, an chéad mhír:

in ionad:

in ionad:

“Tá cinneadh déanta ag Parlaimint na hEorpa tús a chur leis an nós imeachta chun 11 phost sealadach a líonadh mar oifigeach garchosanta (1) (AST 3) — An tAonad um Shlándáil agus um Chosaint sa Stiúrthóireacht um Gharshlándáil agus um Chúnamh, Slándáil agus Sábháilteacht.”,

léitear:

léitear

“Tá cinneadh déanta ag Parlaimint na hEorpa tús a chur leis an nós imeachta chun poist shealadacha a líonadh mar oifigeach garchosanta (1) (AST 3) — An tAonad um Shlándáil agus um Chosaint sa Stiúrthóireacht um Gharshlándáil agus um Chúnamh, Slándáil agus Sábháilteacht.”.

---

(1)  Aon tagairt san fhógra seo do dhuine den ghnéas fireann measfar freisin gur tagairt í do dhuine den ghnéas baineann.

1

---
**Exhibit 13.2**

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Videocond2h Limited (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

(i) the accompanying annual report onForm 20-F/A of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2015 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company. 

Date: February 18, 2016 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, and is not being “filed” either as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement, and is not to be incorporated by reference into the Report or any other filing of the Company, whether made before or after thedate hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. The foregoing certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subjectto the liabilities of Section 18 or Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996             MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,863                   7,945
<SECURITIES>                                     2,029                   2,057
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,003                   3,109
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (160)                   (304)
<INVENTORY>                                        927                     936
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,943                  14,039
<PP&E>                                           2,918                   3,459
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,681                 (2,203)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,542                  15,594
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,228                   4,219
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                     14,041                       0
<COMMON>                                         1,690                  25,578
<OTHER-SE>                                    (11,640)                (14,418)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,542                  15,594
<SALES>                                          2,261                   3,032
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,957                   3,722
<CGS>                                            1,170                   1,363
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,556                   1,643
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,082                   3,104
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  19                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (660)                   (944)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (660)                   (944)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (660)                   (944)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)                  (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Evaristo MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-51095 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 20, 2018

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Evaristo Martinez, Pro Se

Before REAVLEY, CLEMENT, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Evaristo Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities jierein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.