## SERVE D FEBRUAR Y 24 , 201 0

OFFIC E O FHEARING S • ' -, : • V""'"^ " U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

>FFIC E O FHEARIN G WASHINGTON , D C IN TH E MATTE RO F BU D FISK E RAYMON D FA A DOCKE T NO . CP10WPOOO 1 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DMSNo . FAA-2010-001 8 

### PROCEDURA L ORDE R I n orde r t o expedit e th e hearin g i n thi s matter, ' th e partie s shal l compl y wit h th e Procedura l Schedul e se t

forth hereinbelow. ^ Th e Rule s o f Practic e for

thi s proceedin g ar e se t fort h i n 1 4 C.F.R . Par t

13 , Subpar t

G , o f th e Federa l Aviatio n Regulations . Unde r FA A Orde r

2150.3 A an dth e Rule s governin g thes e proceedings , th e Agenc y attorne y an dth e Responden t shoul dcontinu e t o conside r th e possibilit y o f settlemen t

an dcompromis e o f

thi s matter. ^ Compromis e ma y b e effecte dwit h o r withou t afinding o f

violatio n (1 4 C.F.R . §13.1 6 fa) (D X NOTE : Thi s presidin g Judg e doe s no t requir e "Discovery " t o b e serve do n th e Judge . Othe r

Judge s hav e differen t

policies , bu t

a s lon g a s thi s cas e i s assigne dt o th e undersigne dpresidin g Judg e th e partie s may , but ar e not required , serv e discover y o n th e undersigned . WHEREFORE , th e partie s b e an dar e hereb y ORDERE D t o adher e t o th e followin g procedura l schedule : 1 . Venu e shal l b e Lo s Angeles , CA. ;

' 1 4 C.F.R . § 13.22 1 states : "Th e administrativ e la

w judg e shal

l giv e eac h part y a t least 60 day s notic e of th e date , tim

e andlocation of

th e hearing. " ^ Furthe r amendments o f

the pleading s wil

l not b e anticipatedabsen

t goo dcaus e shown . While 1 4 C.F.R . § 13.214(b)(1 ) permit s amendment s a t an y tim e mor e tha n 1 5 day s befor

e ahearing , utilizatio n of

tha t provision wouldpreven

t orderly preparatio n fo

r ahearing an

dcouldpreven

t an y hearing a

t all , sinc e notic e of ahearing mus t

b e give n 60 day s i

n advance . 1 4 C.F.R . § 13.221(a) . A n amendmen

t whic h migh t b e filed 1 5 day s prior

to th e hearin g wouldentitl e th e othe r part y u p to 2 0 day s i

n whic h to repl y (1 4 C.F.R . § 13.214(c)) , an

dcouldgenerat

e ane w roundof

schedule s (1 4 C.F.R . § 13.217) , motion s (1 4 C.F.R . § 13.218) , anddiscover

y (1 4 C.F.R . § 13.220) , necessitatin g apostponemen t of the hearing , ane

w 60-da y notice , e t ceteraa dinfinitum . ^ Se e LindaJoyc e Goodman , FA A Docke t No . CP89WP0061 , Orde

r date dMa y 30 , 1989 .2 . O n o r befor e Ma y 1 , 2010 , th e partie s shal l conclud e all discover y including , but no t limite dto , depositions , documen t production , response s t o productio n request s an^d/o r interrogatories . I f

th e partie s canno t

resolv e a discover y disput e the y shal l submi t th e disput e t o th e undersigne dfor resolutio n i n atimel y manner ; ^ 3 . O n o r

befor e Ma y 1 , 2010 , th e partie s shal l b e prepare dt o presen t thes e case s a t ahearin g o n th e merits'' , subjec t t o th e availabilit y o f

courtroo m facilities . 4 . Th e partie s wil l hav e th e opportunit y t o file Post-Hearin g brief s an d argument s pursuan t

t o aschedul e t o b e determine dat th e hearing . Fo r guidance , th e followin g schedul e i s typicall y used : Complainan t shal l file it s brie f fifteen (15 ) day s afte r

receip t o f th e transcript ; Responden t shal l it s brie f fifteen (15 ) day s thereafter ; an dan y rebutta l brie f b y th e Complainan t shal l b e filedseve n (7 ) day s thereafter . 5 . Settle dcase s wil l not b e remove dfro mth e hearin g docke t unti l th e prope r writte n pleading(s) , consisten t with th e applicabl e rules, ^ i s receive db y th e presidin g judge. ^ 6 . TH E PARTIE S AR E ADVISE D THA T SUBMISSION S SEN T T O TH E STREE T ADDRES S O FTH E U.S . DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATION , OFFIC E O FHEARINGS , MA Y B E DELAYE D IN DELIVER Y DU E T O SCREENIN G CONDUCTE D A T TH E LOCA L U.S . POS T OFFIC E BUL K

MAI L FACILIT Y AN D MAY TAK E U P T O FOU R WEEK S T O ARRIV E B Y REGULA RMAIL . I N ADDITION , SUBMISSION S MAY B E "IRRADIATED " A T TH E FACILITY , WHIC H AFFECT S TH E QUALIT Y O FTH E SUBMISSION . TH E PARTIE S AR E ENCOURAGED , BU T NO T REQUIRED , T O FA X O REXPRES S CARRIE RPLEADING S AND/O ROTHE RSUBMISSIONS . TH E

" * 1 4 C.F.R . § 13.22 1 states : "The administrativ e la w judg e shal

l give eac h part y a t leas t 60 day s notic e of th e date , tim

e andlocation o

f th e hearing. " 1 4 C.F.R . § 13.21 5 states : A t an y tim e befor e o r during ahearing , a

n agency attorne

y ma y withdra w a complain t o r part y ma y withdra w areques t

fo r ahearin g withou

t th e consen

t o f th e administrativ e la

w judge . I f a n agency attorne

y withdraw s th e complain

t o r apart y withdraw s the reques t

fo r ahearing an

dthe answer , th e administrativ e la w judg e shal

l dismis s the proceeding s unde r thi s subpar

t wit h prejudice . ^ See : I n th e Matte

r of Lewi s Drak

e & Associates . FA

A Docke t No . CP03SO0045 , DMS . No . FAA-2003

- 16379 , "Orde

r Terminating Proceeding" , serve dFebruar y 26 , 2005 ; citing Kerr

y Jame s Eldridge . FA

A Docke t CP89GL0458 , "Orde

r Canceling Hearing an

dTerminating Proceeding" , servedJanuar y 16 , 1991 , a t 1 ; I n Th e Matte r of Rober t Harri s FA A Docke t No . CP03EA0001 . DMSNo . FAA-2002-14236. , Orders datedOctobe

r 18 , 200 4 an dOctobe r 27 , 2004 . USAIR , Inc. . FA A Docke t CP90NE0359 . Tran s Worl

d Airlines . Inc. . FA

A Docket s CP90GL0085 . CP90CE0110 . CP90CE0114 . CP90CE0134 . Orde r of Administrativ e La

w Judg e Burton S . Kolko , servedApril 8 , 1992 , p . 2 . Se e "Orde r Dismissing Complainant' s Appeal" . I

n Th e Matte r of Rober t Harris , FA

A Docke t No . CP03EA0001 . DMS No . FAA

2005-14 , August

15,2005 .^ CERTIFICAT E O FSERVIC E SHAL L REFLEC T TH E MANNE RO F SERVICE . AL L PLEADING S SHAL L INCLUD E TELEPHON E NUMBER S WHER E TH E PARTIE S CAN B E REACHED .

Richar dC . Goodwi n U.S . Administrativ e La w Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No . CPlOWPOOO

l (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC E LIS T OR ] GINA L & ON E COP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W1000 '

ON E COP Y Arthu r Wasserman, Respondent' s Counse l La w Offic e o f

Arthu r Wasserma n 1638 0 Rosco e Blvd. , Suit e 12 0 VanNuys,C A 91406-122 1 TEL : 818-895-823 4 FAX : 818-895-067 5 Lierr e Green , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counse l Western-Pacifi c Region , AWP- 7 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n P.O . Bo x 9200 7 Lo s Angeles , C A 90009-200 7 TEL : 310-725-711 7 FAX : 310-725-681 6 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-213 9 Lega l Assistan t

202-366-512 1 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service was by U.S . Mail . For servic e i n person o r b y expedite dcourier , us e the followin g address : Hearing Docket , Federa

l Aviatio n Administration , 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S . W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building - Roo

m 2014 , Washington , D

C 20591 , Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 .