alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                              20
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      20
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,042
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,076,748
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        20
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,324
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (51,324)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (51,324)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (51,324)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.02)


</TABLE>
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 14-2369

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v. Antonio Acevedo-Rodriguez lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield

____________ Submitted: March 18, 2015 Filed: March 23, 2015 [Unpublished]

____________ Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Antonio Acevedo-Rodriguez directly appeals the 70-month sentence imposed by the district court 1 after he pleaded guilty to illegally reentering the country and

1 The Honorable Beth Phillips, United Stat es District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.being a felon in possession of a firearm. In a brief filed under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), counsel argues that the district court erred by assessing 3 criminal history points for Acevedo’s November 1996 perjury conviction. After careful review, we affirm. See United States v. Delgado-Hernandez , 646 F.3d 562, 566 (8th Cir. 2011) (per curiam) (sta ndard of review). The district court properly determined that the perjury convi ction involved a sentence of imprisonment exceeding 1 year and 1 month--even though A cevedo alleged that he had served only 1 year of the 2-year prison sentence before being paroled--because criminal history points are based on the sentence pronounced rath er than the time actually served. See U.S.S.G. §§ 4A1.1(a), 4A1.2(b) & comment. (n.2 ). The court also did not clearly err in finding, based on Acevedo’s statement during his presentence interview, that he had last reentered the country prior to May 2011. Because illegal reentry is an ongoing offense for which relevant c onduct is calculated from the dateof the last reentry, see Delgado-Hernandez , 646 F.3d at 567, Acevedo’s November 1996 perjury sentence was imposed within 15 years of his comme ncement of this reentry offense, see U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(e)(1) & comment. (n.8). Having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues fo r appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, and we gr ant counsel’s motion to withdraw, subject to counsel informing appellant about the procedures for seeking rehearing from this court and for filing a petition for writ of certiorari.

______________________________

-2-
No. 11-10102.

#### Atterberry *v.*Illinois.

App. Ct. Ill., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-10287.

#### Williams *v.*Brown, Governor of California.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Official Journal C 219/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 219 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 653 June 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 219

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 653 June 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 219/01 | Euro exchange rates — 2 June 2022 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 219/01

Euro exchange rates — 2 June 2022

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 219/02 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10741 – HG / EFMS / TA / IFS) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 219/03 | Publication of an application for approval of an amendment, which is not minor, to a product specification pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 4 |
| 2022/C 219/04 | Publication of an application for registration of a name pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 20 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2022/C 219/02

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10741 – HG / EFMS / TA / IFS) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

2

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2022/C 219/03

Publication of an application for approval of an amendment, which is not minor, to a product specification pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

4

2022/C 219/04

Publication of an application for registration of a name pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

20

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [S-18-2022]

On February 9, 2022, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the City and County of Denver, grantee of FTZ 123, requesting subzone status subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 123, on behalf of Kaiser Premier LLC, in Fort Morgan, Colorado.

                    The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and Regulations, including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (87 FR 8563, February 15, 2022). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board Executive Secretary (15 CFR Sec. 400.36(f)), the application to establish Subzone 123J was approved on March 31, 2022, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.13, and further subject to FTZ 123's 858-acre activation limit.                

Dated: March 31, 2022.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-07216 Filed 4-5-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8580 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate segments of the 

Little Manatee River as a component of the Wild and Scenic Rivers 

System, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 13, 2020 

Mr. BUCHANAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate 

segments of the Little Manatee River as a component 

of the Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Little Manatee Wild 

5 and Scenic River Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8580 IH

1 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF WILD AND SCENIC RIVER SEG2 MENTS, LITTLE MANATEE RIVER, FLORIDA. 

3 Section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 

4 U.S.C. 1274(a)) is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(231) LITTLE MANATEE RIVER, FLORIDA.— 

7 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The approximately 50-mile 

8 segment beginning at the source in southeastern 

9 Hillsborough County, Florida, downstream to the 

10 point at which the river enters Tampa Bay, includ11 ing appropriate tributaries, to be administered by 

12 the Secretary of the Interior as a scenic river. 

13 ‘‘(B) SET ASIDE.—The designation under this 

14 paragraph shall not include— 

15 ‘‘(i) those portions lying within Manatee 

16 County, Florida, and being more particularly 

17 described as Parcel ID 247800059, Parcel ID 

18 248200008 and Parcel ID 248100000; and 

19 ‘‘(ii) South Fork. 

20 ‘‘(C) WITHDRAWAL.—Subject to valid existing 

21 rights, the Federal land within the boundaries of the 

22 river segments designated by subparagraph (A) is 

23 withdrawn from all forms of— 

24 ‘‘(i) entry, appropriation, or disposal under 

25 the public land laws; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8580 IH

1 ‘‘(ii) location, entry, and patent under the 

2 mining laws; and 

3 ‘‘(iii) disposition under all laws relating to 

4 mineral and geothermal leasing or mineral ma5 terials.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
EAVS Jurisdictions: 2022 EAVS Data Brief: Arkansas 75 

 Voter Registration 

Active Reg. Voters as of Nov. 8, 20221 

1,475,838 

Reg. Forms Received2* 

486,722 

Total Confirmation Notices Sent3* 

216,653 

Voters Removed from Reg. Rolls4* 

195,595 

Source of Registration Applications5 

Motor Vehicle Dept. 54.2% 

Other 16.2% 

Mail, Email, Fax 15.4% 

In Person 15.2% 

Online 0.0% 

 Voting and Turnout  Election Technology 

Voters Participating By Mode6 

7 Turnout 

40.1% 

In-Person 

Election Day 

378,667 

42.2% 

Mail 

15,949 

1.8% 

In-Person 

Early 

501,915 

56.0% 

Other 

1,855 

0.2% 

Total Voting Locations8: 1,005 

Total Poll Workers9: 5,200 

Percentage of Jurisdictions Using...10 

100.0% 

Ballot 

Marking 

Devices 

100.0% 

Electronic 

Poll 

Books 

100.0% 

Scanners 

25.3% 

DREs with

VVPAT 

9.3% 

Hand 

Counting

0.0% 

DREs w/o 

 VVPAT 

 Mail Ballots 

• 20,325 mail ballots transmitted11 

• 83.3% of transmitted mail ballots returned by voters12 

• 90.8% of returned mail ballots counted13 

• 6.8% of returned mail ballots rejected14 

• Did not conduct all-mail election15 

• Allowed drop boxes16 

• Allowed ballot curing17 

 Election Audits18 

-- Access audit -- Legal audit 

-- Ballot design audit ✔ Logic and accuracy 

testing 

✔ Ballot reconciliation 

audit ✔ Post-election tabulation audit 

-- Compliance/ 

procedural audit -- Other 

-- Eligibility audit 

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at www.eac.gov 

/research-and-data/datasets-codebooks-and-surveys. 

Responses of “Does not apply,” “Data not available,” and “Valid 

skip” are shown as zeroes or dashes. Percentages may not sum 

to 100% because of missing data or rounding. 

* Close of registration for 2020 

general election to close of 

registration for 2022 general 

election. 

1 A1b of EAVS. 

2 A3a of EAVS. 

3 A8a of EAVS. 

4 A9a of EAVS. 

5 Mail, Email, Fax is A4a/A3a. 

In Person is A4b/A3a. Online is 

A4c/A3a. Motor Vehicle Dept. is 

A4d/A3a. Other is the sum of 

A4e–A4l/A3a. May not sum to 

100% because of missing data. 

6 In-Person Election Day is F1b. 

Mail is F1d+F1g. In-Person Early 

is F1f. Other is F1c+F1e+F1h. 

7 F1a of EAVS divided by citizen 

voting age population (CVAP). 

8 D2a of EAVS. 

9 D7a of EAVS. 

10 F3a–f, F5a–F9a of EAVS; 

number of jurisdictions that 

responded “Yes” divided by

number of jurisdictions in 

state/territory. 

11 C1a of EAVS. 

12 C1b/C1a of EAVS. 

13 C8a/C1b of EAVS. 

14 C9a/C1b of EAVS. 

15 Q17 and Q17a of Policy 

Survey. 

16 Q19 of Policy Survey. 

17 Q20 of Policy Survey. 

18 Q36 of Policy Survey. See 

survey questionnaire for full 

definitions of each type of 

audit.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Rescue Concepts, Inc., Relator

Appellate case number: 01-16-00564-CV

Trial court case number: 2014-71749

Trial court: 270th District Court of Harris County

On July 18, 2016, relator, Rescue Concepts, Inc. (“RCI”), filed a petition for a writ 

of mandamus seeking to vacate the respondent trial judge’s June 30, 2016 order granting 

third-party defendant Jones Lang LaSalle—Texas, Inc.’s motion to compel the 

production of RCI, because RCI claims it discloses confidential attorney-client 

communications, to direct the trial judge to enter an order denying such production, and 

to tax costs against real party in interest Jones Lang LaSalle—Texas, Inc. RCI included 

in its mandamus record, among other documents, an order signed by the respondent, on 

July 8, 2016, granting RCI’s motion to stay, which would stay the June 30, 2016 order 

provided that RCI file a mandamus petition challenging that order by July 18, 2016.

With its petition, RCI also filed a motion for leave to file materials in camera, or 

alternatively, for an order requesting in camera materials to be transmitted from the trial 

court. RCI requests that this Court either order the trial clerk to transmit to this Court 

copies of the documents that were submitted in camera to the trial judge or else grant 

RCI leave to submit authenticated copies of the in camera documents to this Court.

Accordingly, we grant RCI’s alternative motion to transmit the in camera

documents to this Court. We ORDER the respondent, the Honorable Brent Gamble, 

presiding judge of the 270th District Court of Harris County, to direct the district clerk to 

make a copy of the documents RCI submitted in camera to the trial court onto a USB 

flash drive. We further ORDER the respondent to direct the district clerk to transmit this

USB flash drive, via a courier or costs to be charged to RCI, to the Clerk of this Court in 

a sealed envelope marked, “Submitted For In Camera Review,” with the above appellate 

cause number and style, within 10 days of this order. Cf. TEX. R. CIV. P. 193.4(a).
Furthermore, the Court requests a response to the petition for a writ of mandamus 

by any real party in interest. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b)(1). The response, if any, shall 

be filed within 30 days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2, 52.4.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: July 28, 2016
No. 10-1018.

No. 11-1002.

No. 11-1076.

No. 11-1098.

No. 11-8477.

No. 11-8516.

No. 11-8586.

No. 11-8680.

No. 11-8772.

No. 11-8872.

No. 11-8886.

#### Filarsky *v.*Delia, Weber, fka Sall *v.*Sall, Clendenin *v.*Illinois, Lomax *v.*United States Senate Armed Services Committee et al., Bilal *v.*Wilkins, Secretary, Florida Department of Children and Families, et al., Feiger *v.*Hickman et al., Logan *v.*Social Security Administration, Watson *v.*Lewis et al., Greene *v.*Department of Labor, Jones *v.*Bowersox, Superintendent, South Central Correctional Facility, Thomas *v.*California (two judgments), *915Clark *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Abascal *v.*Bellamy et al., Draganov *v.*Washington,

*914566 U. S. 377;

566 U. S. 938;

566 U. S. 963;

566 U. S. 963;

566 U. S. 910;

566 U. S. 911;

566 U. S. 912;

565 U. S. 1270;

566 U. S. 944;

566 U. S. 947;

566 U. S. 947:

*915No. 11-8889.

No. 11-8912.

No. 11-9130.

566 U. S. 964;

566 U. S. 947; and

566 U. S. 950. Petitions for rehearing denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 238 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 238

    Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for a breast cancer 
      survivors event sponsored by the National Race for the Cure.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 1998

 Mr. Solomon (for himself, Mr. Petri, Mr. Tanner, Mr. Dingell, and Mr. 
    Ortiz) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
    Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for a breast cancer 
      survivors event sponsored by the National Race for the Cure.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF BREAST CANCER SURVIVORS EVENT ON CAPITOL 
              GROUNDS.

    The National Race for the Cure (referred to in this resolution as 
the ``Race'') may sponsor an event on the Capitol Grounds on April 1, 
1998, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate may jointly 
designate.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--The event to be carried out under this resolution 
shall be--
            (1) free of admission charge; and
            (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress 
        and under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect of the 
        Capitol and the Capitol Police Board.
    (b) Responsibility.--The Race shall assume full responsibility for 
all expenses and liabilities incident to all activities associated with 
the event.

SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

    For the purposes of this resolution, the Race may erect upon the 
Capitol Grounds, subject to the approval of the Architect of the 
Capitol, such stage, sound amplification devices, commemorative pink 
ribbon, and other related structures and equipment as may be required 
for the event to be carried out under this resolution.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

    The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board may make 
any such additional arrangements that may be required to carry out the 
event under this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

__________________________________________ ) Application of ) ) CENTURION AIR CARGO, INC. ) DOCKET OST-2010-0233 ) for renewal of exemption authority ) (U.S.-Ecuador) ) __________________________________________)

APPLICATION OF CENTURION AIR CARGO, INC. FOR RENEWAL OF AN EXEMPTION

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to: John R. Mietus, Jr. Law Office of John Mietus, LLC 6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 300 Bethesda, MD 20817-7500 (202) 747-5212 (240) 396-5362 fax john@mietuslaw.com Counsel for CENTURION AIR CARGO, INC.

NOTICE: Any person may support or oppose this application by filing an answer and serving a copy of the answer on counsel for Centurion and upon persons served with this application no later than August 13, 2012.

July 27, 2012BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

__________________________________________ ) Application of ) ) CENTURION AIR CARGO, INC. ) DOCKET OST-2010-0233 ) July 27, 2012 for renewal of exemption authority ) (U.S.-Ecuador) ) __________________________________________)

APPLICATION OF CENTURION AIR CARGO, INC. FOR RENEWAL OF AN EXEMPTION

Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 40109(c), Centurion Air Cargo, Inc. (“Centurion”) respectfully requests renewal of the above-captioned exemption, granted by Notice of Acti on Taken dated September 29, 2010, for an additional, two-year period. The Notice permits Centurion to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of property and mail (1) from points behind the United States, via the United States and intermediate points, to a point or points in Ecuador and beyond, and (2) from Ecuador to any point or points, and to integrate this exemption authority with its existing authority.

Centurion intends to invoke the automati c extension provisio ns of 5 U.S.C. § 558(c) and Part 377 of the Department's Special Regulations; this application is timely pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 377. 10. In support of this application,

Centurion states as follows:- 2 - Centurion Renewal Application 1. Centurion first obtained U.S.-Ecuador authority in 2002. The Department has consistently found th at Centurion is operationally and financially qualified to conduct U.S.-Ecu ador operations and that grant of the authority is consistent with the aviation agreement between the United

States and Ecuador.

2. Centurion submits that renewal of the authority remains in the public interest and consistent with U.S.-Ecuador relations. Centurion’s frequent operations between the U.S. and Ecuador have been well-received by the shipping public. Information offi cially noticeable under Rule 24(g) of the Department’s Procedural Regulations supports Centurion’s continued

fitness for U.S.-Ecuador service. Renewal will not constitute a major regulatory action under Part 313 of the Department’s regulations and the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975. Finally, the authority to be renewed is contemplated by the 2010 Protocol to the U.S.-Ecuador Air Transport Agreement, which grants U. S. all-cargo carriers broad rights.
**CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS**  **INFORMA TION** 

725 Chesterbrook Blvd

Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087

J uly 31 , 2014

C hristine Sannerud, Ph.D.

Section Chief, U.N. Reporting and Quota Section

Drug Enforcement Administration

8701 Morrissette Drive

Springfield, Virginia 22152

RE : Proposed Aggregat e Production Quotas (APQ) for S c hedule I and II Controlled

Substances for 2015: Docket No. DEA

- 393

D ear Dr. Sannerud,**CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS**  **INFORMA TION**