alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Application Under the Equal Access 

to Justice Act of--

Environmental Safety Consultants, Inc. 

Under Contract No. N62470-95-C-2399 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 51722 

Mr. Peter C. Nwogu 

President 

Ronald J. Borro, Esq. 

Navy Chief Trial Attorney 

Ellen M. Evans, Esq. 

Senior Trial Attorney 

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE FREEMAN ON 

MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION AND/OR EVIDENTIARY HEARING 

By letter dated 23 December 2013, Environmental Safety Consultants, Inc. (ESCI) 

filed a "motion for clarification and/or evidentiary hearing" regarding the Board's 

3 December 2013 Reconsideration ofDenial of an Equal Access to Justice Act Award. 

Our 3 December 2013 decision affirmed on reconsideration the Board's 26 June 2013 

denial ofESCI's application for an award of fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal 

Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 5 U.S.C. § 504. Environmental Safety Consultants, Inc., 

ASBCA No. 51722, 13 BCA ~ 35,352. 

Although titled as a motion for clarification, we interpret ESC I' s motion as one for 

reconsideration. ESCI is not entitled to reconsideration of a reconsideration decision. 

Environmental Safety Consultants, Inc., ASBCA No. 53485, 06-1 BCA ~ 33,122. 

ESC I' s motion is dismissed and the Recorder is instructed not to accept any 

further filings by ESCI relative to this EAJA application. 

Dated: 28 January 2014 

l~~r¥- MONROE E. FREEMAN)R" I 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

(Signatures continued) 
I concur 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals on an application for fees and other expenses 

incurred in connection with ASBCA No. 51722, Appeal of Environmental Safety 

Consultants, Inc., rendered in accordance with 5 U.S.C. § 504. 

Dated: 

2 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
# National Partnership for Student Success (NPSS)

- Biden-Harris Administration Calls on Colleges, Universities, and Schools to Partner in Addressing K-12 Learning Loss, Announces Initial Cohort of Committed Partners Today, the U.S.
#### COM. v. NIEVES, A.

1373 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/22/2017

CP-45-CR-0000032-2013 (Monroe)

Affirmed
# Úřední věstník C 179A/25.

| | ISSN 1977-0863 |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | C 179A |
| | |
| České vydání | Informace a oznámení | Ročník 6125. května 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0863

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

C 179A

České vydání

Informace a oznámení

Ročník 6125. května 2018

---

| Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- |
| | Opravy |
| 2018/C 179 A/01 | Oprava oznámení o výběrovém řízení č. PE/197/S ( Úř. věst. C 144 A, 25.4.2018 ) | 1 |

Obsah

Strana

Opravy

2018/C 179 A/01

Oprava oznámení o výběrovém řízení č. PE/197/S ( Úř. věst. C 144 A, 25.4.2018 )

( Úř. věst. C 144 A, 25.4.2018 )

1

---

| CS | |
| --- | --- |

CS

---

Opravy

| 25.5.2018 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | CA 179/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2018

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

CA 179/1

---

Oprava oznámení o výběrovém řízení č. PE/197/S

(
  Úřední věstník Evropské unie C 144 A ze dne 25. dubna 2018
  )

(2018/C 179 A/01)

Strana 1:

místo:

„Evropský parlament pořádá výběrové řízení na základě kvalifikačních předpokladů a zkoušek za účelem vytvoření seznamu vhodných uchazečů pro obsazení jedenácti pracovních míst:“,

má být:

má být:

„Evropský parlament pořádá výběrové řízení na základě kvalifikačních předpokladů a zkoušek za účelem vytvoření seznamu vhodných uchazečů pro obsazení pracovních míst:“.

Strana 2, v bodě A.1. Obecné podmínky, první odstavec:

Strana 2, v bodě A.1. Obecné podmínky, první odstavec:

místo:

místo

„Evropský parlament rozhodl o zahájení výběrového řízení na obsazení jedenácti dočasných míst pracovníka služby pro osobní ochranu (1) (AST 3) – generální ředitelství pro bezpečnost a ochranu, ředitelství pro ochranu a asistenci, bezpečnost a zabezpečení.“

má být:

má být

„Evropský parlament rozhodl o zahájení výběrového řízení na obsazení dočasných míst pracovníka služby pro osobní ochranu (1) (AST 3) – generální ředitelství pro bezpečnost a ochranu, ředitelství pro ochranu a asistenci, bezpečnost a zabezpečení.“

---

(1)  Jakýkoli odkaz v tomto oznámení na osobu mužského pohlaví bude považován také za odkaz na ženské pohlaví a naopak.“,

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1993
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1993
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    00
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.2

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2015-1 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer International Puerto Rico LLC (the Subservicer), does
hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Subservicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of February 25, 2015, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc.,
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2015-1 and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Subservicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER INTERNATIONAL PUERTO RICO LLCBy:

/s/ Troy MillerName:

Troy MillerTitle:

PresidentDate:

March 30, 2017
Exhibit
32.1









CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Beverly Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jonathan Roylance, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350,
as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.         The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.         The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period
covered by the Report.




March
      25, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Jonathan
      RoylanceJonathan
      RoylancePresident,
      Chief Executive Officer, Chief
      Financial Officer, Secretary and Director (Principal
      Executive, Financial, and Accounting Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH DISTRICT, AT EL PASO
No. 08-20-00181-CV In the Interest of J. A. V., a Child

v.

(No. 2019DCM5797 IN 65TH DISTRICT COURT OF EL PASO COUNTY)
Type of Fee Charges Paid By SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTER'S RECORD CLERK'S RECORD REPORTER'S RECORD FILING FILING $93.75 $222.00 $948.75 $205.00 $205.00 UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN UNKNOWN INDIGENT INDIGENT EL PASO COUNTY EL PASO COUNTY N/A N/A

Balance of costs owing to the Eighth Court of Appeals, El Paso, Texas: 0.00 Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court. I, ELIZABETH G. FLORES , CLERKOF THE EIGHTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for the Eighth District of Texas, this April 23, 2021.
Elizabeth G. Flores, Clerk
(logo) BERKADIA®

 

 

 

Annual Statement as to Compliance

For the Year Ended December 31, 2023 (the “ReportingPeriod”)

 

*Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation,*

*COMM Series 2014-UBS6*

 

 

Pursuant to Section 3.06(f) ofthe Amended and Restated Subservicing Agreement governing the referencedtransaction (the “Servicing Agreement”), I hereby attest that:

 

i. Areview of the activities and performance of Berkadia as Subservicer during theReporting Period has been made under my supervision.

 

              ii. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review,Berkadia as Subservicer has fulfilled, in all material respects, itsobligations under this Servicing Agreement throughout the Reporting Period andno default by the Subservicer under the Servicing Agreement has occurred and iscontinuing.

 

 

Berkadia Commercial MortgageLLC,

 

 

 

/s/ Mark E. McCool

Mark E. McCool

President

February 10, 2024
# C_2021128EN.01004901.xml

| 12.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/49

---

Action brought on 20 February 2021 — Growth Finance Plus v EUIPO (doglover)

(Case T-114/21)

(2021/C 128/62)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Growth Finance Plus AG (Gommiswald, Switzerland) (represented by: H. Twelmeier, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark doglover — Application for registration No 18 107 487

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 November 2020 in Case R 720/2020-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# Closed School Loan Discharges

- Education Department Releases Proposed Regulations to Expand and Improve Targeted Relief Programs Today, the U.S. Department of Education  (Department) released proposed regulations that would expand and improve the  major student loan discharge programs authorized by the Higher Education Act.
- American Career Institute Borrowers to Receive Automatic Group Relief for Federal Student Loans The U.S. Department of  Education (ED) announced today plans to grant borrower defense relief for  federal student loan borrowers who attended the now-defunct American Career  Institute (ACI) in Massachusetts.
Moffett B. Roller

mroller@rollerbauer.com

Law Offices

ROLLER & BAUER, PLLC

Washington Dulles International Airport

45005 Aviation Drive; Suite 200

Dulles, VA 20166

Phone: 202-331-3300 • Fax: 202-331-3322

Lee A. Bauer

lbauer@rollerbauer.com

August 30, 2013

Mr. Robert Finamore

Foreign Carrier Licensing Division

Office of International Aviation

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Polling Report re Application of Express Freighters Australia Pty Limited (EFA) for

a Foreign Air Carrier Permit and for an Exemption; Docket DOT-OST-2013-0160

Dear Mr. Finamore:

We have polled the U.S. carriers on the Service List that was attached to the Application of

Express Freighters Australia Pty Limited (EFA) for a Foreign Air Carrier Permit and for an

Exemption that was filed in the above docket on August 22, 2013. EFA is an Australian foreign

air carrier that seeks authority to engage in foreign scheduled and charter air transportation of

property and mail between any point or points in the United States and any other point or points.

None of the U.S. carriers on the Service List has any objection to DOT approval of the

Application. EFA therefore requests the Department to grant expedited approval of the Application

by issuing EFA an initial exemption and by issuing an order to show cause why the Department

should not issue EFA a foreign air carrier permit. Prompt approval of the Application would enable

EFA to commence its U.S. operations and provide the public benefits cited in the Application as

soon as possible.

We are serving copies of this letter by email on all parties that were served with the Application.

Respectfully submitted,

ROLLER & BAUER, PLLC

Attorneys for

Express Freighters Australia Pty Limited

By: ___________________________

Moffett B. Roller

cc: Service List
1 The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-3464

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Raymond L. Clifton, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: July 6, 2009 Filed: July 22, 2009

___________ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Raymond Clifton appeals the district court’s 1 judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d); brandishing a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(ii); and be ing a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e). The districtcourt sentenced Clifton to a total of 480 months in prison and 3 years of supervised release, and he appeals.-2- In a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Clifton first challenges the admission of eyewitness identifi cation evidence. We conclude that the district court did not err in denying Clift on’s motion to suppress the evidence, because the procedures used in obtaining the eyewitness identifications were not impermissibly suggestive or unreliable. See United States v. Jones , 535 F.3d 886, 891 (8th Cir. 2008) (de novo review of denial of motion; witness’s identification of defendant is admissible unless it is based upon pretrial confrontation between witness and suspect that is both impermissibly s uggestive and unreliable); United States v. Staples , 410 F.3d 484, 487 (8th Cir. 2005).

We also conclude that the district court did not commit clear error at sentencing in denying an acceptance-of-responsibility re duction. Clifton’s defense included an attempt to assert a justification defense, which was not tantamount to a constitutional challenge unrelated to th e issue of guilt. See United States v. Rivera-Ordaz , 554 F.3d 724, 726 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of re view; defendant must show he clearly demonstrated acceptance of responsibility); cf. United States v. Crumley , 528 F.3d 1053, 1067-68 (8th Cir. 2008) (decision by distri ct court as to whether defendant has accepted responsibility is largely factual question that turns on issues of credibility, and reviewing court will reve rse only if decision was clearly erroneous; reduction is generally not appropriate if government goes through burden of proving its case at trial, unless defendant was merely ascertaining viability of issue unrelated to guilt such as constitutional challenge to statute).
Following our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we have found no nonfrivolous i ssues. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw on condition that counsel inform appellant about the procedures for filing petitions for rehearing and for certiorari; and we deny appellant’s request for a stay.

______________________________
Submitted January 31;

convictions on Counts 1 and 2 reversed and remanded for entry of judgment of conviction for one count of first-degree sexual abuse, remanded for resentencing, otherwise affirmed March 1;

petition for review denied August 24 2017 (361 Or 803)

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Plaintiff-Respondent, v.*ROCKY LEE VANDEBERG, aka Rocky Vanderberg, *Defendant-Appellant.*

Deschutes County Circuit Court

11FE0934; A157515

389 P3d 1196

Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Lindsey K. Detweiler, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Shannon T. Reel, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Sercombe, Presiding Judge, and Flynn, Judge, and DeHoog, Judge.

*191PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for two counts of first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427, raising three assignments of error. We reject defendant’s first and second assignments of error without discussion, and write only to address his third assignment. In that assignment of error, defendant asserts that the trial court erred when it failed to merge the two guilty verdicts into a single conviction for first-degree sexual abuse. *See*ORS 161.067; *State v. Parkins,*346 Or 333, 347-55, 211 P3d 262 (2009); *see also State v. Black,*270 Or App 501, 348 P3d 1154 (2015). The state concedes that, under the circumstances of this case, the trial court so erred. We agree, and accept the concession.

Convictions on Counts 1 and 2 reversed and remanded for entry of judgment of conviction for one count of first-degree sexual abuse; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.
# C_2021263EN.01003101.xml

| 5.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/31

---

Action brought on 18 May 2021 — Sunshine Smile v EUIPO (PlusDental+)

(Case T-265/21)

(2021/C 263/41)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Sunshine Smile GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: D. Kirschner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark PlusDental+ in blue and red colours –Registration No 18 126 826

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 March 2021 in Case R 1834/2020-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order the publication of the application for registration of the EU mark No 18 126 826; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the publication of the application for registration of the EU mark No 18 126 826;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of the right to be heard pursuant to Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the right to be heard pursuant to Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of New Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2015 (as amended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC and CNH Equipment Trust 2015-A, does hereby certify that:

 

1.                                      NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.                                      The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Indenture Trustee.

 

3.                                      This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.                                      A review of the Servicer’s activities during the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2016 and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

5.                                      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2016.

 

6.                                      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 29th day of March, 2017.

 

----

 
| March 29,   2017 |   |
|-----------------------|--------|
|                  | By:    | /s/ Brett D. Davis |
|                  | Name:  | Brett D. Davis |
|                  | Title: | President |

 

----