alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S.Departmentof Transportation Office oftheSecretary ofTransportation

McCarthy Area Council P.O. Box MXY 31 Glennallen. AK 99586
To Whom It May Concern: October 29.2010 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE Wasnlngton, DC 20590



### I.:Y U1 <::> Iwould like to update you on the essential air service (EAS) situation at Gulkana, May Creek, and McCarthy, and give you an opportunity to offer any comments on the record before we submit arecommendation to the Assistant Secretaryfor Aviation and International Affairs. As you may know, Ellis AirTaxi, Inc. d/b/a Copper Valley Air Service (Ellis Air) is the current EAS provider at those communities, receiving a combined subsidyof$424.652, and their contract expires January 31, 2011. In anticipation ofthat, we issued Order 2010-9-27, September27, 2010, soliciting proposals from carriers interested in providing subsidized EAS for a new, two-year period, beginning February 1,2011. In response to ourrequest. only the incumbent. Ellis Air, submitted a proposal to maintain status-quo service at all three communities.
In case you have not received a copy ofthe proposal from Ellis Air, it can be accessed at \vww.rcgulations.gov by entering the numbers OST-1995-492. I will briet1y summarize their proposal here.
Ellis Airhas proposed one service option at Gulkana using six-seat twin engine Piper PA31 aircraft operating two round trips each week year-round to Anchorage for an annual subsidy of$262,220. At MayCreek and McCarthy, Ellis Airproposes to provide two nonstop orone-stop round trips perweek to Gulkana using three-seatCessna 185 aircraft during winter months and four-seat Cessna 206 aircraft during summermonths for an annual subsidy of$176,692.
The schedules that the carrierhas proposed are illustrative only and they may make schedule changes to ret1ect changingconditions, e.g., to bettermeet shifting connecting bank times at the hub. However, the Department does expect a subsidized aircarrier to maintain well-timed and well-spaced t1ights in orderto ensure full compensation.
We request that you review the proposals and submit any comments you may have as soon as possible, but no later than November 16. We will carefully consider your comments before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for a decision.

### - 2

-

Please send your comments via e-mail to EAS@dot.gov orby fax to 202-366-7638. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Michael Martin ofmy staffat michael.f.martin@dot.gov or 202-366-6494

. Sincerely,

cc: RebeccaJ. Cronkhite Gulkana Village Council 

# .**JW~~** 

# f V'- Dennis 

### J. DeVany, Chief Essential Air Service Division Office ofAviation Analysis
WALTER P. JENKINS,

INDIVIDUALLY,

Appellant,

v.

ED CRAPO, AS PROPERTY

APPRAISER FOR ALACHUA

COUNTY, FLORIDA, and

DEVAUGHN SLONE and

MILTON H. BAXLEY II, COTRUSTEES OF LLC TRUST,

Appellees.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-1194

_____________________________/

Opinion filed May 19, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Monica J. Brasington, Judge.

Walter P. Jenkins, Individually, pro se, Appellant.

John C. Dent, Jr., of Dent & McClain, Sarasota, and C. Valentine Bates, of Bates

& Brown, Micanopy, for Appellees (no appearances).

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

THOMAS, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
# C_2021088EN.01004102.xml

| 15.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 88/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/41

---

Action brought on 27 January 2021– Cepewa v EUIPO — Out of the blue (Lieblingsmensch)

(Case T-48/21)

(2021/C 88/55)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Cepewa GmbH (Karben, Germany) (represented by: M. Gail, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Out of the blue KG (Lilienthal, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark Lieblingsmensch — EU trade mark No 16 581 332

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 November 2020 in Case R 917/2020-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) and (b) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b) and (d) of Regulation No (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) and (b) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b) and (d) of Regulation No (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of the first sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the first sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of the first sentence of Article 95 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the first sentence of Article 95 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# DTRA to the U.S. Joint Forces...We have the Technology!

/ Published May 8, 2023
Camp Dawson WV, www.dtra.mil***DTRA provides cross-cutting solutions to enable the Department of Defense, the United States Government, and international partners to Deter strategic attack against the United States and its allies; Prevent, reduce, and counter WMD and emerging threats; and Prevail against WMD-armed adversaries in crisis and conflict.***
No. 11-1153.

#### Ognibene et al. *v.*Parres et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 295 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 295

    To designate October 18, 1996, as ``National Mammography Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 18, 1996

    Mr. Biden (for himself, Mr. Abraham, Mr. Akaka, Mr. Baucus, Mr. 
 Bingaman, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Bradley, Mr. Bryan, Mr. Burns, Mr. Chafee, 
 Mr. Cohen, Mr. Coverdell, Mr. D'Amato, Mr. Domenici, Mr. Dorgan, Mr. 
Feingold, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Ford, Mr. Frist, Mr. Glenn, Mr. Grassley, 
 Mr. Gregg, Mr. Hatch, Mrs. Hutchison, Mr. Inouye, Mr. Johnston, Mrs. 
  Kassebaum, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Levin, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. 
   Lott, Mr. Mack, Mr. McCain, Ms. Mikulski, Ms. Moseley-Braun, Mr. 
Moynihan, Mr. Murkowski, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Pell, Mr. Reid, Mr. Robb, Mr. 
 Rockefeller, Mr. Roth, Mr. Sarbanes, Mr. Simon, Mr. Smith, Ms. Snowe, 
Mr. Specter, Mr. Stevens, Mr. Thomas, Mr. Thurmond, Mr. Wellstone, Mr. 
     Kennedy, Mr. Kerrey, and Mr. Simpson) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                           September 25, 1996

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    To designate October 18, 1996, as ``National Mammography Day''.

Whereas, according to the American Cancer Society, 184,300 women will be 
        diagnosed with breast cancer in 1996, and 44,300 women will die from 
        this disease;
Whereas, in the decade of the 1990's, it is estimated that about 2,000,000 women 
        will be diagnosed with breast cancer, resulting in nearly 500,000 
        deaths;
Whereas the risk of breast cancer increases with age, with a woman at age 70 
        having twice as much of a chance of developing the disease than a woman 
        at age 50;
Whereas at least 80 percent of the women who get breast cancer have no family 
        history of the disease;
Whereas mammograms, when operated professionally at a certified facility, can 
        provide a safe and quick diagnosis;
Whereas experts agree that mammography is the best method of early detection of 
        breast cancer, and early detection is the key to saving lives; and
Whereas mammograms can reveal the presence of small cancers of up to 2 years or 
        more before regular clinical breast examination or breast self-
        examination (BSE), saving as many as 30 percent more lives: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate designates October 18, 1996, as 
``National Mammography Day''. The Senate requests that the President 
issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to 
observe such day with appropriate programs and activities.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Chayce Daniel HODGES, also known as Staks, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-11787 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 8, 2018

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Chayce Daniel Hodges, Pro Se.

Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Chayce Daniel Hodges has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d, 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hodges has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Hodges’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. *See United States v. Isgar,*739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Hodges’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cíe. RÍ 42.2. Hodges’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT RESERVE ENGINEERS

     As Harken Energy Corporation's independent reserve engineers, Ryder Scott
Company consents to the reference in this registration statement to Ryder Scott
Company's reserve report dated December 31, 2001.


                                                /s/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.
                                                --------------------------------

Houston, Texas
December 20, 2002
# State Education Agencies

- Raise the Bar Policy Brief: Eliminating Educator Shortages through Increased Compensation, High-Quality and Affordable Educator Preparation and Teacher LeadershipJuly 2023
02/19/2015 10:36 FAX 3107256816 A\VP-7
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFlCE OF HEARlNGS WASIDNG:TON, DC In tbe Matter ofMarco Fimbres: FAA DOCKETUNASSIGNED FAA CASE NO. 20l4WP070124 Respondent ,nJDGENOT ASSIGNED COMPLAINT 141012

The Complainantfiles its Complaint, pursuant to Rule 208 ofthe Ruks ofPractice (14 C.F.R. 13-208), and states as follows: l. Respondent, Marco Fimbres, was advised through a Final Notice ofProposed Civil Penalty, dated January 22, 2015, that the FAA proposed 1o assess a civil penalty in the amount of$7,000.00. On January 26,2015, Respondent submitted a Wiitten request !clr a hearing. The request was received by the agency on february 3, 2015. ll. l. On or about June 8, 2014, at approximately 0010 local, Rcspondenl pointed a laser at an aircraft. 2. The aircraft Respondent pointed the laser at was a Helio Courier mcdel .H-800 aircraft, civil registration number N400HE, which was flying**.ne~r** Benson Highway and Country Club Road in Tucson, Arizona.02/19/2015 10:36 FAX 3107255816 AWP-7

3. Thebeam oflight illuminated the cockpit ofN400HE. 4. The beam oflight interfered with a crewmember in the performance ofthe crewmcmber's duties aboaTd N400HE.

III. By reason ofthe foregoing facts and circumstances, Respondent violated the**fo]k,,~ing** section ofthe Federal Aviation Regulations (Title 14, Code ofFederal Regulations): liiJ 013 3

Section 91.11, which states that no person may assault, threaten, intimidate, or interfere with a crewmember in the performance ofthe crewmembcr's duties aboard an aircraft being operated. IV. L Pursuant to Title 49 U.S.C. Section 4630I(a), Respondent is subject to a civil pena.lty not to exceed $)1,000.00 for each ofthe violations alleged. 2. Under the facts and circumstances ofthis case, a civil penalty of$7,000.00**i~** appropriate.02/19/2015 10:36 FAX 3107256816 AlVP-7 4!J 014

WHEREFORE, the Complainant, respectfully requests thatthe Administrative Law Judge enteran order that Respondent be assessed a civil penalty in the amount of$7,000.00. Respectfully,submitted, ' --, I Lie1re Green Altomey ..:-.
Oftice1 ofthe Regional Counsel Fedefal Aviation Administration Western-Pacific Region DATED: 

### FEB 1

### g 201502/19/2015 10:36 FAX 3107256816 AWP-7 141 015
CERTIFICATEOF SERVICE I hereby certifythat on this date I have sent by facsimile andplaced inthe (.Jnitecl States m.ail, postage prepaid, certified mail- return receiptrequested, the executed original and one copy ofthe Compbint, addressed as follows: Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 Facsimile: (202) 493-5142 I further certify that on this elate I have placed in the United States mail, postage prepaid, certified mail- rctum receipt 1·eques1ed, and regular mail, a true copy ofthe Complaint, addressed as follows:

Dated: Marco Fimbres 4444 l!. Benson Highway, Trlr 21 Tucson, A2 85706 

### FEB 1 !I 

### 2015 

# ____a**~... '~~**  

# ' JeffK ' ·erg, Legal

## ~ic~ Office ofthe Regional Counsel Federal Aviation Administration Western-Pacific Region Lawndale, California
#### Melissa DENT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, Defendant-Appellee, and MD Small Business Development Center, Defendant.

No. 17-1824

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 14, 2017

Decided: January 24, 2018

Melissa Dent, Appellant Pro Se. Constantine Alexander Hortis, Christopher Bowie Lord, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Melissa Dent appeals the district court’s order dismissing her employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. *Dent v. Univ. of Md.,*No. 8:16-cv-02446-DKC (D. Md. June 12, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
#### Makandi L. TERRY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN EVANS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-7246

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 22, 2018

Decided: March 6, 2018

*237Makandi L. Terry, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Attorney General, Caroline M. Scrantom, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Makandi L. Terry seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012).'A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Terry has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny Terry’s motion for appointment of counsel, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
No. 11-1219.

#### Gjerde *v.*State Bar of California.

Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 23.2

                      (LETTERHEAD OF RYDER SCOTT COMPANY)


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


       As independent petroleum engineers, we hereby consent to the use of our
name in the Annual Report on Form l0-K of 3DX Technologies Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 1996. We further consent to the inclusion of our estimate of
reserves and present value of future net reserves dated February 6, 1997 in such
Annual Report.



                                                             RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
                                                             PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

Houston, Texas
March 26, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          45,098
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   77,022
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,674)
<INVENTORY>                                     78,297
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               234,772
<PP&E>                                         106,109
<DEPRECIATION>                                (46,077)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 653,047
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           98,300
<BONDS>                                        530,877
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           592
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,537
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   653,047
<SALES>                                        271,881
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               271,881
<CGS>                                          138,025
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  138,025
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               125,587
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   150
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,809
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (23,292)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,450
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (24,742)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (24,742)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.42)
        

</TABLE>
(logo) LNR

         Partners, LLC

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

OF

 

LNR PARTNERS, LLC

** **

** **

The undersigned, Job Warshaw,being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the "Special Servicer"), asspecial servicer under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement for thetransactions listed on Schedule I hereto, hereby certifies, subject toany limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, onbehalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an authorized officerof the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:

 

1. A review of the activitiesperformed by the Special Servicer during the period commencing on January 1,2016 and ending on December 31, 2016 (or any other shorter period set forth on ScheduleI hereto) (the "Reporting Period"), and the Special Servicer'sperformance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under mysupervision; and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicing criteriaunder Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilled itsobligations under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement in allmaterial respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

LNR Partners, LLC, 

a Florida limited liabilitycompany

 

By: /s/ Job Warshaw

Job Warshaw

President

 

 

Dated: February 22, 2017

 

 

1601 Washington Avenue ∙Suite700 ∙ Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164

Telephone: (305) 695-5600 ∙Fax: (305)695-5601

 

 

**Schedule I**

 

MSBAM 2015-C21

Morgan Stanley Bank of AmericaMerrill Lynch Trust 2015-C21, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,Series 2015-C21

 

Dominion Bond Rating Service Limited

333 West Wacker Drive, Suite1800 

Attn: Commercial MortgageSurveillance 

Chicago IL 60606

General Contact

 

Fitch Ratings Inc. 

33 Whitehall Street

Attention: CommercialMortgaged Surveillance 

New York NY 10004

General Contact

 

Moody's Investors Service,Inc. 

7 World Trade Center

250 Greenwich Street

Attn: Commercial MortgageSurveillace Group 

New York NY 10007

General Contact

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1221 Avenue of the Americas 

New York NY 10020

James Y. Lee

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 Broadway

New York NY 10036 

Stephen Holmes

 

Morningstar Credit Ratings,LLC 

220 Gibraltar Road, Suite 300 

Attn: CMBS Surveillance 

Horsham PA 19044

General Contact

 

Morningstar Credit Ratings,LLC

1065 Avenue of the Americas,33rd Floor 

New York NY 10018

General Contact

 

Situs Holdings , LLC 

4665 Southwest Freeway

Houston TX 77027 

Pete Larsen

 

Situs Holdings , LLC

2 Embarcadero, Suite 1300 

San Francisco CA 94111 

Stacey Ciarlanti

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 

9062 Old Annapolis Road 

Columbia MD 21045 

Group Notices
U.S. Election Assistance Commission

BOARD OF ADVISORS EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 2023

Last Name First Name Title Term Term Period 

Moore Gregory Chair 1 year 

4/25/23-Annual 

Meeting 2024

Hatch Ricky Vice Chair 1 year 

4/25/23-Annual 

Meeting 2024

Ritchie Mark Secretary 1 year 

4/25/23-Annual 

Meeting 2024

as of 5/12/23