alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.1(d)



 Exhibit 10.1(d) 

June 1, 2013 
 AAA Capital Management Advisor, Ltd. 

1300 Post Oak Blvd. #350 
 Houston, Texas 77056 

Attention: Mr. Anthony Annunziato 
 Re:
Management Agreement Renewals 
 Dear Mr. Annunziato: 

We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the “Management
Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2014 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	AAA Capital Energy Fund L.P. 

  

	 	•	 	AAA Capital Energy Fund L.P. II 

  

	 	•	 	AAA Master Fund LLC 

  

	 	•	 	Orion Futures Fund L.P. 

  

	 	•	 	Institutional Futures Portfolio L.P. 

  

	 	•	 	Global Futures Fund LTD. 

  

	 	•	 	Orion Futures Fund (Cayman) LTD. 

  

	 	•	 	AAA ARC Feeder Fund L.P. 

 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter
and returning it to the attention of Mr. Damian George at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any questions I can be reached at 212-296-1292. 

Very truly yours, 
 CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC 

 

			
		
	By:	 	/s/ Damian George
		 	 Damian George
 Chief Financial Officer and
Director


  

			
	
	AAA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Anthony Annunziato
	 Print Name:
	 	Anthony A. Annunziato
	 DG/sr
EXHIBIT
32.2




Certification
Pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Telestone Technologies Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with
the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Yu
Xiaoli, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated:
November 15, 2010




By:
            /s/
      Yu XiaoliName:
            Yu
      XiaoliTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 43 (Wednesday, March 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10030]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5330]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP97-258-000]


Gas Transport, Inc.; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

February 27, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 21, 1997, Gas Transport, Inc. (GTI), 
P.O. Box 430, Lancaster, OH 43130-0430, filed in Docket No. CP97-258-
000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 157.212 of the 
Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205, 
157.212) for authorization to construct and operate a new delivery 
point in West Virginia under GTI's blanket certificate issued in Docket 
No. CP86-291-000 pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as 
more fully set forth in the request that is on file with the Commission 
and open to public inspection.
    GTI proposes to construct and operate a new connection for the 
delivery of gas to Hope Gas, Inc. (Hope). The new delivery point 
location is 702+00 GTI Line #1, Clay District, Wood County, West 
Virginia. The quantity of gas to be delivered at this delivery point is 
a maximum of 3,000 Mcf per year. GTI states that this new delivery 
point is not prohibited by its existing tariff and that it has 
sufficient capacity to accomplish deliveries without detriment or 
disadvantage to other customers. The proposed delivery point will not 
have an effect on GTI's peak day and annual deliveries and the total 
volumes delivered will not exceed total volumes authorized prior to 
this request. The cost of construction is estimated at $2,000 and Hope 
will provide a contribution-in-aid-of-construction to finance the 
measurement and regulation.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-5330 Filed 3-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# C_2023063EN.01001001.xml

| 20.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 December 2022 — European Investment Bank v KL

(Case C-68/22 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Staff of the European Investment Bank (EIB) - Concept of ‘invalidity’ - Declaration of fitness to work - Unjustified absence - Action for annulment and for damages)

(2023/C 63/12)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: European Investment Bank (represented by: G. Faedo and I. Zanin, acting as Agents, and by A. Duron, avocate)

Other party to the proceedings: KL (represented by: A. Champetier and L. Levi, avocates)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the European Investment Bank (EIB) to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by KL. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Investment Bank (EIB) to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by KL.

---

(1)  OJ C 213, 30.5.2022.

---
#### John LASCHKEWITSCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-1950

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 26, 2018

Decided: March 12, 2018

John B. Laschkewitsch, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Marshall Jarrell, ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON, PA, Charlotte, North Carolina; Misty A. Murray, HIN-SHAW *&*CULBERTSON LLP, Los An-geles, California, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John B. Laschkewitsch appeals the district court’s orders granting the motion to compel arbitration, confirming the arbitrator’s award, and denying the motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Laschkewitsch v. TransamericaLife Ins. Co.,*No. 5:14-cv-00632-D, 2015 WL 12851582, 2016 WL 9776963, 2017 WL 4485896 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 20, 2015; Sept. 21, 2016; July 17, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process,

*AFFIRMED*
Submitted October 7,

affirmed November 30, 2016

#### WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A., as trustee for WAMU Mortgage pass through Certificate Series 2006-PR3 Trust, *Plaintiff-Respondent, v.*Doris E. YOUNG, *Defendant-Appellant.*

Washington County Circuit Court

C134961CV; A157287

385 P3d 1277

Doris E. Young filed the brief *pro se.*

Michael J. Farrell, Alice Sayers Newlin, and Martin, Bischoff, Templeton, Langslet & Hoffman LLP filed the brief for respondent.

Before Sercombe, Presiding Judge, and Flynn, Judge, and DeHoog, Judge.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. *Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Peper,*278 Or App 594, 377 P3d 678 (2016); *Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas v. Walmsley,*277 Or App 690, 374 P3d 937 (2016).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                           8,534
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,534
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                     309
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,225
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,933
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,736
<OTHER-SE>                                    (77,120)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,225
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,835
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 502
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (22,337)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (22,337)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,337)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.002)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.002)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7599

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ROBERT GORDON BUNGER, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:11-cr-00597-CCB-1; 1:17-cv-01329-CCB)

Submitted: February 15, 2018 Decided: February 20, 2018

Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Gordon Bunger, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Rachel Miller Yasser, OFFICE OF THE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Gordon Bunger, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order dismissing as 

untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) 

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the 

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court 

denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see MillerEl v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bunger has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2021297EN.01005001.xml

| 26.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/50

---

Action brought on 9 June 2021 — Jeronimo Martins Polska v EUIPO — Aldi Einkauf (Vitalsss plus)

(Case T-325/21)

(2021/C 297/62)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Jeronimo Martins Polska S.A. (Kostrzyn, Poland) (represented by: E. Jaroszyńska-Kozłowska and R. Skubisz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co. OHG (Essen, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark Vitalsss plus — Application for registration No 17 969 083

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 April 2021 in Cases R 503/2020-1 and R 647/2020-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant, and in case the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal joins the proceedings, by the intervener. |
| --- | --- |

—

order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant, and in case the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal joins the proceedings, by the intervener.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in connection with Article 27(4) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in connection with Article 27(4) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of China  Direct  Trading
Corporation  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2007,  as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Stewart  Wallach,  Chief  Executive/Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/    Stewart Wallach
Stewart Wallach
CEO and President
(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)


August 14, 2007


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

             CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRESIDENT

                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Harold Blomquist, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Simtek Corporation on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Simtek Corporation.



/s/Harold Blomquist
-------------------------------------
Harold Blomquist
Chief Executive Officer and President

December 11, 2006
©{ ̄ ̄

¥ 

a° ̄ 

a{¥®a 

B((mnmCmo*n 

® ̄ 

¥ 

 ̄© 

B((mnm&n 

M#&ċ#ĂċǷ#& 

&Ǿ#ǹǸ ̃R!#ǽǾǼǼ˻ǽ

Oǹ

IǸǾǼǸǾ

!MV 

Pǿ&#ˎǽǽ#ǽǾǸ

Oǹ

!#ǽ#&#Ǿ#ǽˎ!Ǹă 

M#&#ǾǼă 

RǼǿ#ǾǷǸǾOǹ 

OǾǼSǾǾˎ!Ǹă R!#ǽǾǼǾ#ǹǸ!Ǽ#Āǽ 

R!#ǽǾǼǾ#ǹǸČOǾǼ 

˳˷ċ˱˲˳ 

˲˷ċ˷˰˶ 

˱˷ċ˳˹˲ 

˱ċ˵˱˶ ˴ċ˰˹˱ 

˰ ˰ ˰ ˶˶˶ ˰ 

!#mnpn#m*#mp)mop 

mn(!#mnpmnpm 

®±¬¬23 

n#m*Amnp!#mnpn#m* 

e#&UVTaV&m+FmT*Uece&Xed 

22 ̄®® 

Cm*fip)n#m*Nmn#fin#m*m*n 

«±­2 ̄ 

Pǹ&&#Ǹ! 

P& 

UO˄ˎVˎ ˎǽǸǾ PǼǹĀ#ǽ#ǹǸ& 

ˏ&&ǹǾ 

Ǽ&ăVǹǾ 

˄ǸǾǼ 

VǹǾă 

M#& 

TǿǼǸǹǿǾČ 

OǾǼ 

˰ ˰ ˰ ˰ ˰ ˰ ˰ 

n#m*#op*mon5Mn"m 

˄ǹǿǸǾ#ǿ&& ˄ǹǿǸǾ 

PǼǾ 

R$Ǿ PǼǹĀ#ǽ#ǹǸ&Č 

OǾǼ 

˲ 

˰ 

˳ 

˰ 

ecV&m+ETmX&U&m+a)ˏa))mVU 

UǸ#ǹǼǷSǼĀ# 

NǹǸ˟Ƿ#&#ǾǼăOĀǼǽǽ 

OǾǼ 

n#m*BOCAA 

®a° 

 ̄± 

a 

±°

B((mnmp*m)#nn 

OAL OAL 

Ppm2#m#m*(B((mnmn(|©© op*monmn(|«a«{®a« 

NǹǾČ˅SǹǷ˅LJ&ǽ˅Ƿă˅˅&Ǹ%˅ǹǼ˅ĄǼǹ˅ǿ˅Ǿǹ˅Ǿ˅ǸǹǾ˅#Ǹ!˅ǼǺǹǼǾǹǼ 

$ǿǼ#ǽ#Ǿ#ǹǸǽ˅ǸǹǾǹ&&Ǿ#Ǹ!ǾǾǾĊ 

e)ecV VE
 

OAL 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 EAVS Data Brief 

VERMONT U ' 

"

"

"

"

¬ 

"

¬ ­

¬­ ­

"

" "

"
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INCORPORATED

SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES

                                                                     State of
Name                                                  Ownership %  Incorporation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Service Electric and Gas Company ...........       100      New Jersey
PSEG Power LLC ....................................       100      Delaware
PSEG Fossil LLC ...................................       100      Delaware
PSEG Energy Resources & Trade LLC .................       100      Delaware
PSEG Energy Holdings L.L.C. .......................       100      New Jersey
PSEG Resources L.L.C. .............................       100      New Jersey
PSEG Global L.L.C..................................       100      New Jersey
PSEG Global International Holdings LLC.............       100      Delaware

      The remaining subsidiaries of Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated
are not significant subsidiaries as defined in Regulation S-X.
**Exhibit 35**

**SERVICER’S ANNUAL CERTIFICATION**

**MECHANICS BANK**

**PURSUANT TOSECTION 4.10 OF THE SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT**

This Servicer’s Annual Certification is delivered pursuant to asale and servicing agreement dated as of December 1, 2014 (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among, California Republic Auto Receivables Trust 2014-4, California RepublicFunding, LLC, Mechanics Bank, as Seller, Servicer, Administrator, Calculation Agent and Custodian (in such capacity, the “Servicer”), Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as indenture trustee (the “IndentureTrustee”) and CSC Logic, Inc. (the “Backup Servicer”). All capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning assigned thereto in Appendix A to the Sale and Servicing Agreement.     

The undersigned, a Responsible Officer of the Servicer, hereby certifies that: 

1.        A review of the activities of the Servicer and of the performance of itsobligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement during the period from January 1, 2017 to and including December 31, 2017 (the “Review Period”) was conducted under my supervision. 

2.        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Review Period. 

[SIGNATURE APPEARS ON NEXT PAGE] 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, in my capacity as specified below, has caused this certificate to beexecuted as of the date indicated below. 

 
            Dated: March 29, 2018  /s/ Nathan J. Duda  Nathan J. Duda  Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Spinnaker Exploration Company:

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
(No. 333-89894) on Form S-3 and in the registration statements (Nos. 333-89779
and 333-36592 and 333-61888) on Form S-8 of Spinnaker Exploration Company and
subsidiaries of our reports dated February 7, 2003, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of Spinnaker Exploration Company and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2002, and the related financial statement schedule,
which reports appear in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of
Spinnaker Exploration Company. Our report on the consolidated financial
statements refers to a change in the method of accounting for derivative
instruments, effective January 1, 2001.

KPMG LLP

Houston, Texas
March 25, 2003
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. § 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofTill Capital Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian P. Lupien, the Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

1.          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.
No. 11-10281.

#### Scales *v.*Sandoval, Governor of Nevada, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2023261EN.01000301.xml

| 24.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/3

---

Order of the President of the Court of 7 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti — Romania) — Criminal proceedings against AR

(Case C-179/22, (1) AR)

(2023/C 261/05)

Language of the case: Romanian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 222, 7.6.2022.

---