alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 2.25

                      INDUSTRIAL DATA SYSTEMS CORPORATION
                     600 CENTURY PLAZA DRIVE, BUILDING 140
                              HOUSTON, TEXAS 77073

                                November 5, 2001

Gentlemen:

     I am writing to you with respect to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated
July 31, 2001, as amended, between Industrial Data Systems Corporation, IDS
Engineering Management, LC, PEI Acquisition, Inc., and Petrocon Engineering,
Inc. (the "Merger Agreement"), and the Settlement Agreement and Plan of
Reorganization dated July 31, 2001, between Petrocon Engineering, Inc.,
Industrial Data Systems Corporation, PEI Acquisition, Inc. and Equus II
Incorporated (the "Settlement Agreement").

     Please sign below to confirm that, assuming all conditions to the closing
are met, the parties have agreed to close the transactions contemplated by the
Merger Agreement and the Settlement Agreement in December 2001, to be effective
following the close of business on December 21, 2001.

                             Sincerely yours,

                             INDUSTRIAL DATA SYSTEMS CORPORATION


                             By:  /s/ William A. Coskey
                                ---------------------
                                William A. Coskey, President

ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:

IDS ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, LC


By:  /s/ William A. Coskey
     ----------------------------------
     William A. Coskey, President

PEI ACQUISITION, INC.


By:  /s/ William A. Coskey
     ----------------------------------
     William A. Coskey, President

PETROCON ENGINEERING, INC.


By:  /s/ Michael L. Burrow
     ----------------------------------
     Michael L. Burrow, President

EQUUS II INCORPORATED


By:  /s/ Randall B. Hale
     ----------------------------------
     Randall B. Hale, Vice President
Exhibit
10.1


 


GLOBAL
EQUITY INTERNATIONAL INC. / MAMMOTH CORPORATION


NOTES
NUMBERS 3, 4 AND 5 RIDER


 


For
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which all parties acknowledge, this Rider dated December 4,
2017 amends Global Equity International Inc. / Mammoth Corporation Note 3 dated April 13, 2017 (“Note 3”), Global
Equity International Inc. / Mammoth Corporation Note 4 dated June 5, 2017 (“Note 4”) and Global Equity International
Inc. / Mammoth Corporation Note 5 (“Note 5”) dated August 9, 2017 (collectively the “Notes”), between
Mammoth Corporation (the “Holder” or “Mammoth”), and Global Equity International, Inc.,
a Nevada Corporation (the “Company”), which remain in effect except as modified by this Rider, as follows:


 


	 	1)	The
    Holder will submit the attached fifth and final, subject to the terms of this Rider, notice of conversion pertaining to Note
    3 ($62,800) to the Company’s Transfer Agent (“the Conversion”). All parties agree that for this conversion
    only the restricted ownership percentage is increased to 9.9%. The Holder will limit its sales of the Shares received from
    the fifth notice of conversion to no more than 15% of the Daily Trading Volume and will prove this to the Company from time
    to time when requested.
	 	 	 
	 	2)	The
    Company will make six equal monthly payments to Mammoth Corporation beginning on January 15, 2018 and ending on June 15, 2018,
    in the amount of $54,168 per month based on the following payoff amounts:


 


	a)	Note
    3:	$
    	0	 
	b)	Note
    4:	$
    	248,737	 
	c)	Note
    5:	$
    	76,275	 


 


	 	3)	The
    payments described in Section 2 will be applied first to Note 5 until the entire Note is satisfied and then to Note 4 until
    this entire Note is satisfied. 


 


The
Holder will suspend further conversions of the Notes immediately after the Shares received from the fifth notice of conversion
clear deposit (Deposited into Holder’s brokerage account free of any restrictions from the Company, Mammoth’s brokerage
and clearing firms, DTC and the SEC, and are able to be freely traded by Holder).


 


The
Holder will no longer suspend further conversions of the Notes and revert back to the conversion terms agreed in each Note in
the event the Shares received from the fifth notice of conversion do not clear deposit or in the event any payment is not made
in a timely manner.


 


Provided
all payments are made when due, no further interest will accrue.


 


	Global
    Equity International Inc.	 
	 	 	 
	By:
    	/s/
    Enzo Taddei	 
	 	Enzo
    Taddei, CFO	 
	 	 	 
	Mammoth
    Corporation	 
	 	 	 
	By:
    	/s/
                                         Brad Hare



	 
	 	Brad
    Hare, President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ITEM 1 OF
FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       8,977,181
<SECURITIES>                                23,336,595
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,873,856
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            44,739,487
<PP&E>                                      11,523,910
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,426,101
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              52,108,388
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,917,663
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        55,981
<OTHER-SE>                                  49,134,744
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                52,108,388
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               669,035
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,601,820
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,932,785)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,932,785)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,932,785)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.45)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER



I, Dennis M. McGrath, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of PAVmed Inc.;
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: April 10,
    2017 | By: | /s/ Dennis M. McGrath                                                                 
|------------------------ | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |     | Dennis M. McGrath, Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### Julius Herring v. State.

154 So. 187.

Division B.

Opinion Filed March 5, 1934.

*157
      *E. M. Baynes,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Cary D. Landis,*Attorney General, and *Roy Campbell,*Assistant, for the State.

Buford, J.

— In this case the plaintiff in. error was' informed against charged with the crime of assault with intent to commit murder and convicted of the crime of as.sault with intent to commit manslaughter.

There are thirty assignments of error. We shall not discuss them separately. Many of the assignments of error are addressed to the alleged errors occurring in the admission of evidence relative to the right of possession of a certain parcel of unfenced open land in the Florida -Everglades, all of which was irrelevant and immaterial and may have been prejudicial to the defendant. The jury was not trying the question of right of possession to the property ■concerning which the altercation appears to have occurred. The question which the jury was required to determine was whether or not defendant unlawfully assaulted the party upon whom he was alleged to have made the assault with a deadly weapon.

During the trial the defendant offered as a witness to prove his reputation as to good character as a peaceable and law-abiding citizen one E. L. Willis, who testified that he *158had lived in the same community with and been personally acquainted with the defendant for the then past five years and that he had never heard anything against defendant’s good character for peace and quietude until the instant difficulty occurred. That he had never heard his character and reputation in this regard discussed in the community. On motion this testimony was stricken. This was error. In Hinson v. State, 59 Fla. 20, 52 Sou. 194, we said:

> “While a witness is not competent to testify to the reputation of another person unless he can say he believes he knows the general reputation of such person in the community, yet one who has been personally acquainted with another for a considerable length of time and who has been in a position where he probably would have heard that other’s reputation talked about were it the subject of comment and who has never heard it questioned may testify to-the good reputation of such person. Such a witness may testify to good reputation by saying that he has never heard anything said against the person.”

The evidence is quite conflicting as to who was the aggressor in bringing on the difficulty and as to whether or not the plaintiff in error acted in his lawful self-defense and, therefore, the errors above mentioned will be sufficient tO' warrant a reversal of the judgment. It is so ordered.

Reversed.

Whitbield, P. J., and Brown, J., concur.

Davis, C. J., and Terrell, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
#### Dale Foster, *et ux.,*v. Lavinah H. Jones, a widow

153 So. 899.

Division B.

Opinion Filed March 7, 1934.

*John Tilden*and *H. N. Roth,*for Appellants;

*Shelby G. Gaskins,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be’given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J; J., concur.
#### Burnett GODBEE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 16-17211 Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(February 14, 2018)

Orlando do Campo, do Campo & Thornton, PA, Miami, FL, for Petitioner-Appellant

Burnett Godbee, Pro Se

Sivashree Sundaram, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Fort Lauderdale, FL, Wifredo A. Ferrer, Emily M. Smachetti, Karen Obviar-Marie Stewart, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Respondent-Appellee

Before WILSON, JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Burnett Godbee appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his sentence for conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 1951, attempted Hobbs Act robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 1951, discharge of a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(l)(A)(ii), and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Godbee contends *Johnson v. United States,*— U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015), invalidated 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(B), and his convictions for Hobbs Act robbery and conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery do not otherwise qualify as crimes of violence under § 924(c)(3)(A).

When we granted Godbee a certificate of appealability on whether *Johnson’s*void-for-vagueness ruling extends to § 924(c)(3)(B), we had not yet addressed the issue. We have, however, since concluded that Johnson’s void-for-vagueness ruling does not extend to § 924(c)(3)(B). *See Ovalles v. United States,*861 F.3d 1257 (11th Cir. 2017). Godbee’s claim is foreclos*589ed by *Ovalles.*Therefore, the denial of his § 2255 motion is

AFFIRMED.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-NXS2

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of July 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer'sknowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Ms. Kimberly Shaw is the Chief of Legislative Affairs for the Defense Threat 

Reduction Agency (DTRA). Ms. Shaw leads a small legislative affairs team 

that facilitates DTRA engagements with Congress in support of the agency’s 

countering weapons of mass destruction mission, its programs, and its 

funding to secure necessary authorities and appropriations in the annual

defense bills.

During her over 20-year federal career, Ms. Shaw has worked in Congress 

and the Department of Defense (DoD), to include 4-star military commands,

legislative affairs, political-military affairs, strategic communications, and 

whole-of-government issues. 

Ms. Shaw led the Engagements team in the Strategic Initiatives Group of the Office of the Chief of 

Space Operations (2021-2023). She has also led the strategic planning team in the Office of Strategy, 

Planning, and Innovation at the DoD Office of Inspector General (OIG) (2019-2021). In this role, Ms. 

Shaw oversaw the drafting and development of the OIG’s annual congressionally required Top DoD 

Management Challenges report. 

Previously, Ms. Shaw served as the Executive Advisor for Legislative Affairs to U.S. Special 

Operations Command (USSOCOM) and advised senior leaders while developing strategic messages 

and engagements to effectively advocate USSOCOM’s priorities to Congress. Shaw also completed a 

yearlong detail in the Secretariat for Special Operations in the Office of the Assistant Secretary of 

Defense for Special Operations & Low Intensity Conflict to support the implementation of Sec. 922 of 

the FY2017 National Defense Authorization Act. 

Ms. Shaw has served as a Professional Staff Member for the House Armed Services Committee 

where she advised HASC members on defense policy issues and negotiated legislative provisions 

related to U.S. European Command, U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, the North Atlantic Treaty 

Organization, DoD building partnership capacity authorities, and DoD and Department of Energy nonproliferation programs. 

Ms. Shaw entered civil service as a Presidential Management Fellow. She holds a Master of Arts 

degree in American History from George Mason University, Master’s degree in Strategic Public 

Relations from George Washington University, Master of Arts in Political Science, and Bachelor of 

Arts in Political Science and History from Florida International University.

Kimberly Shaw

Chief, Legislative Affairs

Distribution Statement A - Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited

BIOGRAPHY

UNCLASSIFIED
EX-10.11(a)



 Exhibit 10.11(a) 
 June 1, 2013 
 PGR Capital LLP 
 Gilmora House 
 57-61 Mortimer Street 
 London W1W 8HS, 
 UK 
 Attention:  Casey Grylls 
  

	 	Re:	Management Agreement Renewals 

 Dear Mr.
Grylls: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the
“Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2014 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	 Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 PGR Master Fund L.P 


  

	 	•	 	 Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 MSSB Spectrum Strategic L.P. 


 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Damian George at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-296-1292. 
 Very truly yours, 

 

			
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Damian George

		 	 Damian George
 Chief Financial
Officer & Director

	 	

  

			
	PGR CAPITAL LLP
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Casey Grylls

		
	Print Name:	 	 Casey Grylls

		
	DG/sr
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-20-00466-CV

Robert Joseph Yezak, Appellant

v.

Jeana A. Riley, Appellee

FROM THE 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY

NO. CV40,354, THE HONORABLE JOHN YOUNGBLOOD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

Appellant Robert Joseph Yezak filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s 

September 1, 2020 order denying appellant’s request for a temporary restraining order. Upon 

initial review, the Clerk of this Court sent Yezak a letter informing him that this Court appears to 

lack jurisdiction over the appeal because our jurisdiction is limited to appeals in which there 

exists a final or appealable judgment, or in the case of an interlocutory order, there is a statute 

that provides for an interlocutory appeal. An order denying a request for temporary restraining 

order is neither. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 51.012; Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 

S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) (explaining that appeal generally may only be taken from final 

judgment that disposes of all pending parties and claims in record unless statute provides for

interlocutory appeal); Stary v. DeBord, 967 S.W.2d 352, 352-53 (Tex. 1998) (“Appellate courts 
2

have jurisdiction to consider immediate appeals of interlocutory orders only if a statute explicitly 

provides appellate jurisdiction.”); see also Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 51.014 (specifically 

permitting appeal of various interlocutory orders but not permitting appeal from grant or denial 

of temporary restraining order). The Clerk requested a response on or before December 10, 

2020, informing this Court of any basis that exists for jurisdiction. To date, no response has been 

filed.

Accordingly, for the reasons explained above, we dismiss the appeal for want of

jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).

__________________________________________

Gisela D. Triana, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Triana, and Smith

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: December 30, 2020
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

MCDONOUGH PROPERTIES, L .. L.C. 

M & R HOLDINGS, L.L.C., 

TRI-D, L.L.C., AND COL. FRANK BARNETT 

Complainant, 

v. 

CITY OF WETUMPKA 

Respondent 

FAA Docket No. 16-12-11 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted 

Airport Enforcement Proceedings. 14 CFR, Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR, Part 16, subpart B, 

the date by which the Final Agency Decision will be issued in this matter is hereby extended 

to on or about January 16, 2015, 2014. 

An extension of time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this 

case. 

Associate Administrator 

for Airports 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

11-

1 HEREBY CERTIFY that on ]) t;-c., { { , 2014, I caused to be placed in the 

United States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy of the Notice of Extension of 

Time, addressed to: 

Counsel for Complainant 

Raymond Veatch, Esq. 

P. 0. Box 302 

Tracys Landing, MD 20779 

Email: manager@intemationa]acs.com 

Wade Ramsey, Esq. 

Ramsey & Associates, LLC 

P. 0. Box 382012 

Birmingham, AL 35238 

Email: waderamsey@aol.com 

Counsel for Respondent 

Pablo 0. Ni.iesch, Esq. 

Anjali G. Pate, Esq. 

Spiegel & McDiarmid, LLP 

1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, DC 20036 

Email: pablo. nuesch@spiegl mcd. com 

Hand Delivered to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-1 00 

FAA Southern Region, AS0-600 

Claudia Roberts 

Airport Compliance and Management 

Analysis
No. 11-9930.

#### Mitchell *v.*Alabama.

Ct. Crim. App. Ala. Certiorari denied.