alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 31

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 6, 1997

Received and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the display of

the Ten Commandments by Judge Roy S. Moore, a

judge on the circuit court of the State of Alabama.

Whereas Judge Roy S. Moore, a lifelong resident of Etowah

County, Alabama, graduate of the United States Military

Academy with distinguished service to his country in

Vietnam, and graduate of the University of Alabama

School of Law, has served his country and his community

with uncommon distinction;
2

•HCON 31 RFS

Whereas another circuit judge in Alabama, has ordered

Judge Moore to remove a copy of the Ten Commandments posted in his courtroom and the Alabama Supreme

Court has granted a stay to review the matter;

Whereas the Ten Commandments have had a significant impact on the development of the fundamental legal principles of Western Civilization; and

Whereas the Ten Commandments set forth a code of moral

conduct, observance of which is universally acknowledged

to promote respect for our system of laws and the good

of society: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—

3 (1) the Ten Commandments are a declaration

4 of fundamental principles that are the cornerstones

5 of a fair and just society; and

6 (2) the public display, including display in gov7 ernment offices and courthouses, of the Ten Com8 mandments should be permitted.

Passed the House of Representatives March 5,

1997.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gundle/SLT Environmental, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 (the "Report"),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I Samir
T. Badawi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. (S)1350, as adopted pursuant to (S)906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

 /S/ Samir T. Badawi
---------------------
Samir T. Badawi
Chief Executive Officer

Date October 24, 2002
    -----------------
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****    - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский 

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

        - Student Loans
        - Grants
        - Laws
        - Data

            - taxonomy view
            - Civil Rights 

# Civil Rights 

# Civil Rights 

                      -  June 16, 2021  U.S. Department of Education Confirms Title IX Protects Students from Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity  
The U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights today issued a Notice of Interpretation explaining that it will enforce Title IX's prohibition on discrimination on the basis of sex to include: (1) discrimination based on sexual orientation; and (2) discrimination based on gender identity.
  **Tags:**Civil RightsTitle IXPress Releases

                    - « first
                    - ‹ previous
                    - 1
                    - 2

## How Do I Find...?

                      - Student loans, forgiveness
                      - Higher Education Rulemaking
                      - College accreditation
                      - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
                      - FERPA
                      - FAFSA
                      - 1098, tax forms
                      - More...

## Information About...

                      - Elevating Teaching
                      - Early Learning
                      - Engage Every Student
                      - Unlocking Career Success
                      - Cybersecurity

----

*Our mission* is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.

          - Student Loans
          - Repaying Loans
          - Defaulted Loans
          - Loan Forgiveness
          - Loan Servicers
          - Grants & Programs
          - Apply for Pell Grants
          - Grants Forecast
          - Apply for a Grant

          - Laws & Guidance
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - Civil Rights
          - IDEA Website
          - Data & Research
          - Education Statistics
          - Postsecondary Education Data
          - ED Data Express
          - Nation's Report Card
          - What Works Clearinghouse
          - Open Data Platform
          - COVID Relief Data

          - About Us
          - Contact Us
          - ED Offices
          - Jobs
          - Press Releases
          - FAQs
          - Recursos en español
          - Budget, Performance
          - Privacy Program
          - Homeroom Blog

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information Quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
Exhibit 4.1




 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


March 26, 2014


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust, Tax Free Income Trust, Series
16


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New
York Mellon is acting as trustee for Smart Trust, Tax Free Income Trust, Series 16 set forth above (the “Trust”).
We enclosed a list of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our
evaluation of such Securities as of close of business on March 26, 2014, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in the
Trust Indenture and Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations
of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-193740) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect
to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.




 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO
	 	Gerardo Cipriano
	 	Vice President
2022 EAVS Data Brief: Ohio EAVS Jurisdictions:

88 

 Voter Registration 

Active Reg. Voters as of Nov. 8, 20221 

8,029,950 

Reg. Forms Received2* 

2,519,705 

Total Confirmation Notices Sent3* 

1,253,658 

Voters Removed from Reg. Rolls4* 

623,116 

Source of Registration Applications5 

Motor Vehicle Dept. 28.6% 

Online 28.0% 

Mail, Email, Fax 17.0% 

In Person 15.3% 

Other 11.1% 

 Voting and Turnout 

Voters Participating By Mode6 

7 Turnout 

47.0% In-Person 

Election Day 

2,654,497 

63.2% 

Mail 

911,517

21.7% 

In-Person 

Early 

550,092 

13.1% 

Other 

85,262 

2.0% 

Total Voting Locations8: 3,637 

Total Poll Workers9: 39,888 

 

Election Technology 

Percentage of Jurisdictions Using...10 

100.0%

Scanners 

98.9% 

Electronic 

Poll 

Books 

77.3% 

Ballot 

Marking 

Devices 

13.6% 

DREs with 

VVPAT 

0.0% 

DREs w/o 

VVPAT 

0.0% 

Hand 

Counting 

 Mail Ballots 

• 996,093 mail ballots transmitted11 

• 91.8% of transmitted mail ballots returned by voters12 

• 99.7% of returned mail ballots counted13 

• 0.3% of returned mail ballots rejected14 

• Did not conduct all-mail election15 

• Allowed drop boxes16 

• Allowed ballot curing17 

 Election Audits18 

✔ Access audit 

-- Ballot design audit 

Ballot reconciliation ✔ audit 

Compliance/ -- procedural audit 

-- Eligibility audit 

-- Legal audit 

Logic and accuracy ✔ testing 

Post-election ✔ tabulation audit 

-- Other 

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at www.eac.gov 

/research-and-data/datasets-codebooks-and-surveys. 

Responses of “Does not apply,” “Data not available,” and “Valid 

skip” are shown as zeroes or dashes. Percentages may not sum 

to 100% because of missing data or rounding. 

* Close of registration for 2020 

general election to close of 

registration for 2022 general 

election. 

1 A1b of EAVS. 

2 A3a of EAVS. 

3 A8a of EAVS. 

4 A9a of EAVS. 

5 Mail, Email, Fax is A4a/A3a. 

In Person is A4b/A3a. Online is 

A4c/A3a. Motor Vehicle Dept. is 

A4d/A3a. Other is the sum of 

A4e–A4l/A3a. May not sum to 

100% because of missing data. 

6 In-Person Election Day is F1b. 

Mail is F1d+F1g. In-Person Early 

is F1f. Other is F1c+F1e+F1h. 

7 F1a of EAVS divided by citizen 

voting age population (CVAP). 

8 D2a of EAVS. 

9 D7a of EAVS. 

10 F3a–f, F5a–F9a of EAVS; 

number of jurisdictions that 

responded “Yes” divided by

number of jurisdictions in 

state/territory. 

11 C1a of EAVS. 

12 C1b/C1a of EAVS. 

13 C8a/C1b of EAVS. 

14 C9a/C1b of EAVS. 

15 Q17 and Q17a of Policy 

Survey. 

16 Q19 of Policy Survey. 

17 Q20 of Policy Survey. 

18 Q36 of Policy Survey. See 

survey questionnaire for full 

definitions of each type of 

audit.
# C_2021431EN.01004201.xml

| 25.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 431/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/42

---

Action brought on 16 July 2021 — Veen v Europol

(Case T-436/21)

(2021/C 431/50)

Language of the case: Slovak

Parties

Applicant: Leon Leonard Johan Veen (Oss, the Netherlands) (represented by: T. Lysina, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | order the European Union, represented by the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) to pay the applicant the sum of EUR 50 000; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Union, represented by the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) to pay the applicant the sum of EUR 50 000;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of his action for the award of damages based on non-contractual liability, brought pursuant to Articles 268 and 340 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 50(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/794, (1) the applicant relies on a single plea in law, based on the unlawful processing of his personal data by the defendant.

The applicant submits, in his plea in law, that the defendant included in the investigation file as evidence in criminal proceedings brought against the applicant in the Slovak Republic, a report by the defendant containing negative and false information about the applicant, unsubstantiated by evidence, resulting in the harmful event. He argues that through that conduct he sustained a slur on his good name and reputation and it entailed an infringement of his right to family life. The applicant has thus incurred non-material damage causally linked to that harmful event, which he assesses at EUR 50 000.

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) 2016/794 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and replacing and repealing Council Decisions 2009/371/JHA, 2009/934/JHA, 2009/935/JHA, 2009/936/JHA and 2009/968/JHA (OJ 2016 L 135, p. 53).

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Threat Reduction Agency 

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  DTRA Leadership             
  -  DTRA History             
  -  Mission             
  -  Strategic Initiatives             
  -  Foreign Malign Influence             
  -  Agency Overview Brief (pdf)             
  -  Agency Financial Report 
-  Careers & Opportunities    -  Your Civilian Career             
  -  Your Military Career             
  -  Welcome Aboard             
  -  Diversity and Inclusion 
-  Business    -  DTRA Contract Award Data             
  -  Office of Small Business             
  -  Mentor Protege Program 
-  News & Media    -  Press Center 
-  Contact Us		 
-  Joint Operations Center		 

# Foreign Malign Influence Fact Sheets

April 14, 2023

 Congressional Research Service (CRS) Ukraine Factsheet 

                                Biological Security Engagement in Ukraine: U.S. Cooperation and Threat Reduction Programs             

### Stay Connected

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-60556

Summary Calendar

__________________

ROBERT F. WILKINS,

Petitioner,

versus

INGALLS SHIPBUILDING, INC.; DIRECTOR, 

OFFICE OF WORKER'S COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, 

Respondents.

______________________________________________

Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board

(93-1044)

______________________________________________

July 18, 1997

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Robert F. Wilkins (Wilkins) petitions for review of a decision

of the Benefits Review Board affirming an order by an

administrative law judge (ALJ) denying additional benefits. We

affirm. 

Wilkins contends that the ALJ erred in finding that Wilkins
2

did not sustain an injury to his back while working on the job for

Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc. We review the Board's decisions for

errors of law and apply the substantial evidence standard that

governs factual findings made by the ALJ. Darby v. Ingalls

Shipbuilding, Inc., 99 F.3d 685, 688 (5th Cir. 1996). We therefore

must affirm decisions of the Board that correctly determine "that

the ALJ's findings are supported by substantial evidence and are in

accordance with the law." Id. 

The record reveals that the Board properly concluded that the

ALJ's factual finding that the back injury did not occur on the job

was supported by substantial evidence. At best, the evidence

reflects a credibility conflict that was best left to the

factfinder, the ALJ, to resolve. Darby, 99 F.3d at 688-89. 

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT
32
  CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
 CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
 SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 The
undersigned officers each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Caspian International Oil Corporation on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
    May 19,
      2008
            /s/ Nurlan
      Janseitov
              Nurlan Janseitov
              Chief Executive OfficerMay 19,
      2008
            /s/ David
      Fulton
              David Fulton
              Chief Financial Officer
 
 This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 05/05-0314]

Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small Business Administration under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, under Section 309 of the Act and Section 107.1900 of the Small Business Administration Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.1900) to function as a small business investment company under the Small Business Investment Company License No. 05/05-0314 issued to Monroe Capital Corporation SBIC LP, said license is hereby declared null and void.

Small Business Administration.

Bailey DeVries,

Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation.

[FR Doc. 2022-07018 Filed 4-1-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Form 10-Q of Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Noven)
for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Diane M. Barrett,
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Noven, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Noven. /s/ Diane M. Barrett  
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Noven
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION

725 Chesterbrook Blvd 

Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087

July 31, 2014

Christine Sannerud, Ph.D.

Section Chief, U.N. Reporting and Quota Section

Drug Enforcement Administration

8701 Morrissette Drive

Springfield, Virginia 22152 

RE: Proposed Aggregate Production Quotas (APQ) for Schedule I and II Controlled 

Substances for 2015: Docket No. DEA-393

Dear Dr. Sannerud,
CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION
Trent Deckard, Co-Director
STATE OF INDIANA J. Bradley King, Co-Director

iana Election Division Indiana Election Division
Indiana 302 West Washington Street, Room E204

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2767
Phone: (317) 232-3939
Fax: (317) 233-6793

July 17, 2015

The Honorable Dr. Willie E. May, Director
National Institute of Standards and Technology
100 Bureau Drive, Stop 1000

Gaithersburg, MD 20899-1000

Dear Dr. May:

On behalf of the Standards Board of the Election Assistance Commission (EAC), | am writing to voice our
gratitude for the involvement of NIST with previous efforts in crafting voting system standards with the
Technica! Guidelines Development Committee (TGDC). As we move forward on a new set of Voluntary
Voting System Guidelines (VVSG), we know NIST will continue to act as an excellent technical resource.

You recently received a letter regarding the TGDC from the National Association of State Election
Directors (NASED}. We appreciate you and the EAC moving quickly to make appointments so the TGDC
could be re-formed and made operational as soon as possible. We agree with the need for the TGDC to
include non-governmental partners to improve the speed and efficiency of this important work.
Further, we support continued advances in reaching a common data format as a means to improving
voting technology nationwide.

As part of our initial meeting, we selected two members of our Standards Board to serve with you on
the TGDC — Bob Giles and Greg Riddlemoser. We also reconstituted the VVSG Committee, who will be
reaching out to you separately, who will work more closely with you to review the new standards and
provide other valuable input.

After a thorough discussion among our executive committee, we also would like to emphasize the need
for the broadest input possible from voting system vendors. We know that they have a vested interest
in what standards they will be asked to meet when creating the next generation of voting equipment;
but we don’t wish to see their concerns dismissed as simply self-serving. All of the stakeholders have
their own interests, and the broader the participation in the process creating them the better the
standards will be.

Finally, it is vital to the standards development process that NIST maintain a strong partnership with the
EAC and its advisory boards so the key stakeholders in this work have continual input into the process.
The EAC's relationships with the election community should be leveraged by NIST as you provide the


technical advice to the TGDC required by HAVA. This partnership will also allow the EAC to maintain a
testing and certification program that adds value to state and local election administrators and ensures
that the new standards are understandable and useful in selecting new voting equipment.

Know that we stand ready to assist you in any way possible.
Sincerely,

J. Bradley King, Chair Oy

EAC Standards Board

Cc: Chairwoman Christy McCormick, Designated Federal Officer