alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

             Certification of Chief Executive Officer and President
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Harold Blomquist, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Simtek Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June
30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Simtek Corporation.

/s/Harold Blomquist
-------------------------------------
Harold Blomquist
Chief Executive Officer and President

August 2, 2007
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report of Air Methods Corporation (the
"Company")  on  Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Sec.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.

/s/Aaron  D.  Todd
-----------------------
Aaron D. Todd
Chief Executive Officer
May 10, 2007

/s/Trent  J.  Carman
-----------------------
Trent J. Carman
Chief Financial Officer
May 10, 2007


A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Air  Methods  Corporation  and will be retained by Air Methods and
furnished  to  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EX-10.16



 EXHIBIT 10.16 
 United Security Bancshares, Inc. 
 Summary of Directors’ Fees

 USBI’s Board of Directors approved the following retainers and attendance fees for board and committee meetings
subject to the United Security Bancshares, Inc. Non-Employee Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferral Plan”) described below: 
 United Security Bancshares, Inc. 
  

			
	 Retainers:
	  	
		
	 Chairperson
	  	$1,350/month
		
	 Board Members
	  	$600/month
		
	 Board Meeting Fees:
	  	
		
	 Board Members
	  	$500/board meeting attended
		
	 Committee Chairperson Fees:
	  	
		
	 Chairperson of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating, Executive and Corporate Governance Committee
	  	$400/committee meeting attended
	
	First United Security Bank
		
	 Board Meeting Fees:
	  	
		
	 Board Members
	  	$400/month

 Each non-employee member of the committees of United Security Bancshares, Inc. (“USBI”) and First United
Security Bank receives $250/committee meeting attended. Additionally, any director who attends regularly scheduled or special board meetings or committee meetings held outside of the director’s county of residence is reimbursed for mileage for
meetings attended. 
 Non-employee directors may elect to defer payment of all or any portion of their First United Security Bank director fees
under the Deferral Plan, and, beginning on January 1, 2012, all United Security Bancshares, Inc. director fees are deferred under the Deferral Plan. The Deferral Plan, which was ratified by shareholders at the annual meeting held on
May 11, 2004, permits non-employee directors to invest their directors’ fees and to receive the adjusted value of the deferred amounts in cash and/or shares of USBI’s common stock.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 36 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 36

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 Approving the Presidential finding that the limitation on obligations 
imposed by section 518A(a) of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, 
  and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 1997, is having a negative 
  impact on the proper functioning of the population planning program.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 36

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Approving the Presidential finding that the limitation on obligations 
imposed by section 518A(a) of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, 
  and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 1997, is having a negative 
  impact on the proper functioning of the population planning program.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the House of 
Representatives and Senate approve the Presidential finding, submitted 
to the Congress on January 31, 1997, that the limitation on obligations 
imposed by section 518A(a) of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, 
and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 1997, is having a negative 
impact on the proper functioning of the population planning program.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 13, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,459
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,459
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,459
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,080
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           711
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,459
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,402
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,402)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Emmanuel SANTIAGO-MIJANGOS, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40589 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 5, 2018

Holly Ann D’Andrea, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Brownsville, TX, Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. At*638torney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Emmanuel Santiago-Mijangos, Pro Se

Before BENAVIDES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Emmanuel Santiago-Mijangos pleaded guilty to illegal reentry into the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(1), and was sentenced to 48 months of imprisonment, an upward variance from the guidelines range. On appeal, Santiago-Mijangos argues that the court’s upward variance was substantively unreasonable. We reviews sentences, whether inside or outside the Guidelines, for reasonableness in light of the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and review the substantive reasonableness of a sentence for abuse of discretion. *Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). In reviewing an above-guidelines sentence for substantive reasonableness, we consider the totality of the circumstances, including the extent of any variance from the guidelines range, to determine whether the § 3553(a) factors support the sentence. *United States v. Gerezano-Rosales,*692 F.3d 393, 400 (5th Cir. 2012). An above-guidelines sentence is unreasonable if “it (1) does not account for a factor that should have received significant weight, (2) gives significant weight to an irrelevant or improper factor, or (3) represents a clear error of judgment in balancing the sentencing factors.” *United States v. Smith,*440 F.3d 704, 708 (5th Cir. 2006). This court defers to the district court’s determination that the § 3553(a) factors, on the whole, merit an upward variance. *United States v. Brantley,*537 F.3d 347, 349 (5th Cir. 2008).

In this case, the district court relied on appropriate § 3553(a) factors.in determining that an upward variance was warranted, as its reasons addressed the nature and circumstances of Santiago-Mijangos’s offense, the need to protect the public from further crimes by Santiago-Mijangos, and the need to deter him from future criminal activity. Nothing suggests that the district court failed to consider a factor that should have received significant weight, gave significant weight to an improper factor, or made a clear error of judgment in balancing the sentencing factors. *See Smith,*440 F.3d at 708. We therefore defer to the district court’s determination that the § 3553(a) factors, on the whole, warrant the variance, *see Brantley,*537 F.3d at 349, and justify the extent of the upward variance imposed, *see United States v. Broussard,*669 F.3d 537, 551 (5th Cir. 2012).

Accordingly, Santiago-Mijangos’s sentence is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cíe. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### COM. v. MUNIZ, E.

1965 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/19/2017

CP-67-CR-0002483-2016 (York)

Affirmed — Application to Withdraw as Counsel Granted
#### COM. v. ANDERSON, R.

1236 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/06/2017

CP-51-CR-0000878-2012 (Philadelphia)

Affirmed
Exhibit 35.5



|     |  |                                                                                                               |  | 
|---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|LOGO |  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1086-120, 12th Floor 550 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334 |  | 
|     | 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2014, by and among GS MORTGAGE
SECURITIES CORPORATION II, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as General Special Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as Cypresswood Court Shopping Center Special Servicer, PENTALPHA
SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Operating Advisor, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-GC26 (the
Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant
to Section 10.07 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such
period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of
March 2016.



|                        
|------------------------
|LOGO                    
|Daniel Bober            
|Executive Vice President
|Wells Fargo Bank        



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000817161
<NAME> ALARIS MEDICAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,285
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,397
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,431)
<INVENTORY>                                     65,619
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               172,530
<PP&E>                                          98,554
<DEPRECIATION>                                (41,861)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 550,263
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           94,950
<BONDS>                                        417,277
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           591
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,411
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   550,263
<SALES>                                        177,654
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               177,654
<CGS>                                           91,353
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   91,353
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                68,155
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   150
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,795
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,111)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (350)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,761)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,761)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Tony Tong, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of PacificNet Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of PacificNet Inc.

I, Shao Jian Wang, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of PacificNet Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of PacificNet Inc.

By: /s/ Tony Tong
    ---------------------
   Tony Tong
   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
   (Principal Executive Officer)

By: /s/ Shao Jian Wang
    ---------------------
   Shao Jian Wang
   Chief Financial Officer
   (Principal Accounting Officer)
Total Polling Locations:

Election Day:7 341 

Early Voting:8 301 

Mail Ballots Transmitted10 Mail Ballots Returned11

3,904,381 3,122,440 (80.0% of 

transmitted) 

Mail Ballots Counted12 Mail Ballots Rejected13

3,092,904 (99.1% of 

returned)

29,536 (0.9% of

returned) 

Mail Voting Policies 

No excuse is required for mail voting14

Conducts all-mail elections statewide15

No permanent absentee voting list16

EAVS Jurisdictions

64 

Total Registered Voters as of 

Nov. 3, 20201

4,211,528 

Registration Forms Received2*

3,195,131 

Total Confirmation Notices Sent3*

705,625 

2020 EAVS Data Brief: Colorado

 Voter Registration

2.2%

6.7%

14.1%

27.3%

49.7%

In-Person

Other

Mail, Email, Fax

Online

Motor Vehicle Dept.

Source of Registration Applications4

 Voter Turnout  Election Technology

In-Person 

Election 

Day Voters 

89,789

2.7%

Mail Voters 

3,092,904

93.1%

In-Person 

Early Voters

108,856

3.3%

Other Mode 

29,058

0.9%

Voters Participating By Mode5

64 63

1 0 0 0

Ballot

Marking

Device

Scanner Hand

Count

DRE w/o

VVPAT

DRE with

VVPAT

Electronic

Poll

Books

Technology Used by Jurisdictions9

 Mail Balloting

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at www.eac.gov. 

The data shown are certified as final by state election authorities

Responses of “Does not apply,” “Data not available, ” and “Valid 

skip” are shown as zeroes or dashes. Percentages may not sum 

to 100% because of missing data or rounding. 

. 

* Close of registration for 2018 

general election to close of 

registration for 2020 general 

election. 

1 A1a of EAVS. 

2 A3a of EAVS. 

3 A8a of EAVS. 

4 Mail, Email, Fax is A4a. InPerson is A4b. Online is A4c. 

Motor Vehicle Dept. is A4d. 

Other is the sum of A4e–A4l. 

Denominator is A3a. 

5 In-Person Election Day Voters 

is F1b. Mail Voters is F1d+F1g. 

In-Person Early Voters is F1f. 

Other Mode is F1c+F1e+F1h. 

Denominator is sum of F1b–

F1h. 

6 F1a of EAVS. Denominator 

is citizen voting age 

population (CVAP). 

7 D3a of EAVS. 

8 D4a of EAVS. 

9 F3a–d, F5a, F6a, F7a, F8a, 

and F11a of EAVS. 

10 C1a of EAVS. 

11 C1b of EAVS. 

12 C3a of EAVS. 

13 C4a of EAVS. 

14Q17 of Policy Survey. 

15 Q18 and Q18a of Policy 

Survey. 

16 Q19 of Policy Survey. 

Turnout6

78.2%
# C_2021391EN.01002401.xml

| 27.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 391/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 391/24

---

Action brought on 10 August 2021 — Neoperl v EUIPO (Representation of a cylindrical sanitary insert part)

(Case T-487/21)

(2021/C 391/33)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Neoperl AG (Reinach, Switzerland) (represented by: H. Börjes Pestalozza and U. Kaufmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for an EU position mark (Representation of a cylindrical sanitary insert part)

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 June 2021 in Case R 2327/2019-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of the first sentence of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the first sentence of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **CMBS Department**

 

MAC N9401-011

1055 10th Avenue SE

Minneapolis, MN 55414 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 BROADWAY

NEW YORK, New York 10036-8200

 

RE: Annual Statement ofCompliance for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2015-C20,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C20

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of January 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the yearending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Gail Vannest

GAIL VANNEST

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.