alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SIMTEK CORPORATION


                                                            Exhibit 11.1
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  Computation of Per Share Earnings
                                                  ---------------------------------


                                     SHARES                                                                   WEIGHTED AVG
                                               BALANCE               DAYS FROM              SHARE               SHARES OF
DATE ISSUED                 INCREASE         OUTSTANDING              1/1/97                DAYS              COMMON STOCK
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                          <C>              <C>                       <C>             <C>                     <C> 
Jan 1, 1997                      --           28,506,685                155             4,418,536,175
June 5, 1997                 50,000           28,556,685                  1                28,556,685
June 6, 1997                 45,000           28,601,685                 13               371,821,905
June 19, 1997                25,000           28,626,685                 27               772,920,495
July 15, 1997                50,000           28,676,685                 64             1,835,307,840
September 17, 1997            2,500           28,679,185                 13               372,829,405


Balance 9/30/97                               28,679,185                273             7,799,972,505           28,571,328
                                              ============================================================================


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000814780
<NAME>                        Enex Oil & Gas Income Program III, Series 3, L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   mar-31-1997
<CASH>                                         34382
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  34333
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               70281
<PP&E>                                         2649994
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2159326
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 560949
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          100910
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     460039
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   560949
<SALES>                                        87358
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               87358
<CGS>                                          30857
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  49181
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6726
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   31451
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
RO 14534 

Ms. Amy J. Blankenbiller 

American Foundry Society 

900 2nd Street, N.E. 

Suite 109 

Washington, D.C. 20002-3557 

Dear Ms. Blankenbiller: 

Thank you for your letter of May 19, 2000 to Ms. Connie Musgrove and Mr. Matt 

Hale regarding Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) requirements for 

foundry sand used in the manufacture of castings. I would also like to express my 

appreciation to you, Mr. Dan Oman, and Mr. Mark Remlinger for conducting site visits 

for Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) staff to three foundries. 

In EPA=s letter to your organization dated March 8, 1995, we addressed the 

process of making sand molds and reusing return sand in the primary production 

process to produce new molds (the sand loop). At that time, we stated our initial 

conclusion that the process of separating bits and pieces of metal, fines, core sand butts, 

and other clumps of mold sand at the shakeout table and screen to create return sand 

for reuse in the sand loop is reclamation of a spent material. Today, EPA is clarifying 

our interpretation of the sand loop based on the processes at the foundries we visited, 

the information that you provided to us, and the opinion of the U.S. Circuit Court for 

the District of Columbia in Association of Battery Recyclers, Inc. v. U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, 208 F.3d 1047 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (referencing American Mining Congress 

v. EPA, 824 F.2 1177 (D.C. Cir. 1987)). Note that this letter only addresses your question 

regarding use of sand in the sand loop. It does not address the status of any thermal 

processing of sand. 

 We believe that reusing sand on-site within the sand loop for mold-making, 

including the separation step described in the paragraph above, is part of a continuous 

industrial production process by the generating industry. Consequently, the sands 
RO 14534 

being reused onsite in the primary production process on a continuous basis in the sand 

loop are not solid wastes. We also believe that sand stored indoors that is reused in the 

sand loop is part of the ongoing production process, as long as it is handled as a 

valuable material for the manufacture of castings. On the other hand, if sand is handled 

in a way that would indicate the material is not valuable (e.g., a sand pile exposed to the 

elements), it would raise questions of whether the sand is being legitimately reused as 

part of the continuous production process. Please note that when foundry sand is 

removed from the process described above for disposal (or for subsequent treatment or 

storage prior to disposal), that sand is a solid waste potentially within the jurisdiction of 

RCRA 

Subtitle C. 

We hope this letter answers your question. If you have any further questions, 

please contact Lesley Schaaff in the Office of Solid Waste at 703-308-0091 or Carolyn 

Dick in 

the Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, RCRA Enforcement Division, at 

202-564-4007. 

Sincerely, 

Elizabeth Cotsworth, Director 

Office of Solid Waste 

Eric Schaeffer, Director 

Office of Regulatory Enforcement 

Office of Enforcement & Compliance 

Assurance
EXHIBIT
32.1









CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Beverly Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jonathan Roylance,
President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and
Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.         The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the
Report.




Dated:
      April 15, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Jon
      RoylanceJon
      RoylancePresident,
      Chief Executive Officer,Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director
      (Principal Executive, Financial, and Accounting Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
pertaining to the 1986 Stock Options Plan (Form S-8 No. 33-44306), the 1991
Employee Stock Purchase Plan and 1988 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for
Non-Employee Directors of Gundle/SLT Environmental, Inc. (Form S-8
No. 33-44531), the Gundle/SLT Environmental, Inc. Amended and Restated 1995
Incentive Stock Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-01759), the Gundle/SLT Environmental,
Inc. Amended and Restated 1995 Incentive Stock Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-63466),
and the Gundle/SLT Environmental, Inc. 1996 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for
Non-Employee Directors (Form S-8 No. 333-23299), and the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 No. 333-27735) of Gundle/SLT Environmental, Inc., and in the related
Prospectus of our report dated January 28, 2003, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Gundle/SLT Environmental, Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.


Houston, Texas
February 27, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>
         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
         UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997
         AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
         STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1997
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                              10,014,000
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                       9,384,000
<ALLOWANCES>                        452,000
<INVENTORY>                         6,544,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    27,915,000
<PP&E>                              4,684,000
<DEPRECIATION>                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      37,257,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               10,819,000
<BONDS>                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<COMMON>                            53,000
<OTHER-SE>                          22,777,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        37,257,000
<SALES>                             25,919,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     25,919,000 
<CGS>                               16,405,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       23,708,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    140,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  101,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     2,071,000
<INCOME-TAX>                        787,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                        1,284,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                       .24
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8354 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8354

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To establish the Servicemembers and Veterans Initiative within the 
   Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Servicemembers and Veterans 
Initiative Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. SERVICEMEMBERS AND VETERANS INITIATIVE.

    (a) Establishment.--There is established the Servicemembers and 
Veterans Initiative within the Civil Rights Division of the Department 
of Justice.
    (b) Duties.--The Servicemembers and Veterans Initiative shall--
            (1) serve as legal and policy advisor to the Attorney 
        General on the Department of Justice's efforts to enforce 
        criminal and civil laws that impact servicemembers, veterans, 
        and their families;
            (2) develop policy recommendations for the Attorney General 
        on how the Department of Justice may improve enforcement of 
        Federal law to support servicemembers, veterans, and their 
        families;
            (3) serve as the liaison and point of contact between the 
        Department of Justice and the military departments;
            (4) provide counsel to the Assistant Attorney General for 
        the Office of Justice Programs to ensure funding decisions take 
        into account servicemembers, veterans, and their families;
            (5) consult with components of the Department of Justice to 
        promote the provision of civil legal aid to servicemembers, 
        veterans, and their families;
            (6) serve as a liaison and point of contact with the 
        Consumer Protection Branch of the Civil Division of the 
        Department of Justice, with respect to the prosecution of 
        Federal crimes involving fraud that target servicemembers; and
            (7) serve as a liaison and point of contact with other 
        components of the Department of Justice as needed to support 
        the enforcement of other Federal laws that protect 
        servicemembers and veterans, as the Attorney General determines 
        appropriate.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 8, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 8354

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To establish the Servicemembers and Veterans Initiative within the 
   Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice, and for other 
                               purposes.
```
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 3 - 1023 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 3 -NM - 042 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### 13 - AD - 9 **Next Step:** FR

AN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, l ist latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comme nts received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
---

Exhibit 99.10

CONSENT OF EXPERT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Osisko
Gold Royalties Ltd (Osisko) filed with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Form 40-F), I, Paul Archer, M.Sc., Eng., hereby
consent to the use of my name in connection with the reference to certain
scientific and technical information as set out under the heading Material
Mineral Project  The Éléonore Royalty with respect to the Éléonore Royalty in
the Annual Information Form for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 filed as
an exhibit to the Form 40-F.

By: /s/ Paul
ArcherName: Paul Archer, M.Sc. March 27, 2017

---
#### Skipper R. CRAIGG, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 105718

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

FILED: January 30, 2018

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Skipper R. Craigg (“Craigg”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Pursuant to plea negotiations, Craigg pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. Craig was sentenced to a fifteen-year sentence. The execution of the sentence was suspended and Craigg was put on probation. After Craigg’s probation was revoked and his sentence was executed, Craigg filed a Rule 24.035 motion sought to set aside his guilty plea. In his amended motion, Craig contends that his plea was involuntary because plea counsel did not inform him of the State’s burden of proof and failed to interview a witness.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Dianna Denise TORRES, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-50513 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 28, 2018

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Bradford W. Bogan, Kristin L. Davidson, Assistant Federal Public Defenders, Maureen Scott Franco, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Dianna Denise Torres appeals her 24-month below-guidelines sentence imposed following her guilty plea to importation of marijuana and possession with intent to distribute marijuana. She argues that her *373sentence is substantively unreasonable because the district court imposed a sentence greater than necessary based on an improper evaluation of the seriousness of her offense. Her contention is that she was entitled to a further downward variance because she waived her constitutional rights when she was arrested by disclosing her relevant conduct, which resulted in a substantial increase in her base offense level.

A properly preserved challenge to the substantive reasonableness of a sentence will be reviewed by this court for abuse of discretion. *Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). The record reflects that the district court considered the arguments of the parties, the aggravating and mitigating circumstances, and Torres’s allocution. Further, the district court identified the basis for its findings that the preponderance of evidence supported the drug quantity attributed to Torres and also provided specific reasons for increasing the base offense level for her use of her minor children.

Torres’s disagreement with the propriety of the sentence or the weight given to the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors by the district court does not suffice to rebut the presumption of reasonableness that applies to her below-guidelines sentence. *See Gall,*552 U.S. at 51, 128 S.Ct. 586; *United States v. Simpson,*796 F.3d 548, 557 & n.51 (5th Cir. 2015). She has failed to show that her sentence does not account for a factor that should receive significant weight, gives significant weight to an irrelevant or improper factor, or represents a clear error of judgment in balancing sentencing factors. *See United States v. Cooks,*589 F.3d 173, 186 (5th Cir. 2009). The sentence is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of The
Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 24, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James D. Weddle, Chief
Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ James D. WeddleChief Executive OfficerThe Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P.November 5, 2010
No. 11-10040.

#### Coats *v.*Illinois.

App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**Section 906 Certificate**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, James Noble, Chief Executive Officer of Adaptimmune Therapeutics plc, a public limited company incorporated under English law (the “Company”), hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

 

1.                           The Transition Report on Form 20-F for the six months ended December 31, 2015 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                           The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: March 17, 2016

 
|   | /s/ James Noble           |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | James Noble               |
|   | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----