alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, James M. Seneff, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund III, Ltd. (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 (the "Report"). The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



Date:  November 10, 2003                       /s/ James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                               ------------------------------
                                               Name:  James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                               Title: Chief Executive Officer


                                               A signed original of this written
                                               statement required by Section 906
                                               has been  provided  to CNL Income
                                               Fund  III,   Ltd.   and  will  be
                                               retained  by CNL Income Fund III,
                                               Ltd.   and   furnished   to   the
                                               Securities      and      Exchange
                                               Commission   or  its  staff  upon
                                               request.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage Servicing**D1086-120, 12th Floor550 South Tyron StreetCharlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2014, by and among RBS COMMERCIAL FUNDING INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as Special Servicer,  TRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, INC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C25 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day March 2016.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A |  (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------|
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the

limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 27, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 06-20770

Summary Calendar

_____________________

DUFFY & McGOVERN ACCOMMODATION SERVICES,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

QCI MARINE OFFSHORE, LLC,

Defendant - Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division

USDC No. 4:05-CV-2360

_________________________________________________________________

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

QCI Marine Offshore, LLC (“QCI”) appeals the district court’s

order applying the doctrine of collateral estoppel to enjoin QCI’s

state court lawsuit against Duffy & McGovern Accommodation Services

(“DMAS”). Finding that the district court did not abuse its

discretion, we affirm.

This case is before us for a second time. The facts and

procedural history are set forth in our previous opinion. Duffy &

McGovern Accommodation Services v. QCI Marine Offshore, Inc., 448

F.3d 825 (5th Cir. 2006). In the first appeal, we considered whether

the district court’s order upholding the validity of the forum
** QCI also argues that this court erred in its determination

that the Texas state court’s decision denying DMAS collateral

estoppel barred the federal courts from considering this argument.

“Absent an intervening Supreme Court or en banc decision or a change

in the statutory law, we are bound to follow the prior panel’s

decision.” United States v. Anderson, 853 F.2d 313, 320 (5th Cir.

1988). This argument is therefore foreclosed.

2

selection clause and dismissing the breach of contract action

precluded QCI from pursuing the same claims against DMAS in state

court. We concluded that the requirements for collateral estoppel

were met as a matter of law, and remanded to the district court for

the discretionary determination whether the doctrine could fairly be

applied in this case. QCI, 448 F.3d at 831. On remand, the district

court concluded that there was no bar to the application of

collateral estoppel and enjoined the parties from proceeding in state

court. 

On appeal, QCI argues that fairness considerations preclude the

application of collateral estoppel in this case. QCI maintains that

DMAS manipulated the judicial system and wasted judicial resources by

seeking relief in federal court after attempting to defend its case

unsuccessfully in state court. The record makes clear, however, that

this course of action was forced by QCI’s attempt to undercut an

adverse ruling by the federal court by initiating a second state

court lawsuit, rather than pursuing its federal appeal. We find no

abuse of discretion.**

The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 95

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing and commending American airmen

their service, bravery, and fortitude.concentration camp during World War II forheld as political prisoners at the Buchenwald
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 95

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas 168 Allied airmen captured by Axis forces during

World War II were held as political prisoners at the Buchenwald concentration camp in Weimar, Germany;

Whereas of these captured airmen, 82 were Americans, 26

were Canadians, 48 were Britons, 9 were Australians, 2

were New Zealanders, and 1 was Jamaican;
2

•HCON 95 EH

Whereas the facts and circumstances of their confinement are

amply documented in the official records maintained by

the National Archives and Records Administration;

Whereas a report from the International Red Cross concerning Stalag Luft III in Sagan, Germany, mentioned six

American airmen held at Buchenwald, including one

whose name does not appear on the lists maintained by

the National Archives;

Whereas since the liberation of Buchenwald in 1945 numerous personal memoirs, scholarly books, and articles have

been published describing the conditions at the concentration camp;

Whereas this extensive documentation records the extraordinarily inhuman treatment, deprivations, and personal

suffering inflicted on these 168 Allied airmen and other

inmates at Buchenwald; and

Whereas Allied Governments and veterans organizations outside the United States have granted special recognition to

their citizens and servicemembers who were held as political prisoners in World War II concentration camps: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) recognizes and commends the 82 American

4 airmen held as political prisoners at the Buchenwald

5 concentration camp during World War II for their

6 faithful service, personal bravery, and exceptional

7 fortitude; and
3

•HCON 95 EH

1 (2) requests that the President issue a procla2 mation recognizing and commending, by name, the

3 service, bravery, and fortitude of those airmen.

Passed the House of Representatives September 16,

1997.

Attest:

Clerk.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.2


                        CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 302


I, Robert Johnston, Jr., certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tutogen
Medical, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) [reserved] / [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238
and 34-47986];

         c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and
         5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: August 14, 2006



/s/ Robert Johnston, Jr.
------------------------
Robert Johnston, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              OCT-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             241
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,555
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,769
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,632
<PP&E>                                           4,314
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,425
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,456
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,571
<BONDS>                                          3,201
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,621
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,456
<SALES>                                          1,942
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,942
<CGS>                                            1,162
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,162
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   928
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  94
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (232)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (232)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (232)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.05)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996             JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995             DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                               0                 837,120
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0               1,861,037
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                 413,896
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0               3,127,062
<PP&E>                                               0              19,600,696
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0               7,477,764
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0              16,667,998
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0               4,244,686
<BONDS>                                              0               1,907,886
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                  56,943
<OTHER-SE>                                           0               9,069,495
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0              16,667,998
<SALES>                                      1,912,493               4,182,786
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,912,493               4,182,786
<CGS>                                        1,492,643               3,142,486
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,492,643               3,142,486
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               625,031               1,240,043
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,815                  72,797
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (189,054)               (185,863)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (189,054)               (185,863)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (189,054)               (185,863)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)                   (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
## J^rfflgCtonwAllWT* courtw?2?°'w Ro.&*U2o* FEB 02 CftPXToL STOTibn) 

### ftUSTIUffl. 1*1)1 AbelAcosffa, a©* Gear 0\sWl C\eLck; Pleaae. loih 4* &rgltfflja, 2H mi PraPeMi uVtaW o4 W leWdoarmed* Udu

### be^CtWS^ciW 3Jl Cad rememberMai^riv^rn^); u//// May Ptoe- §/Ve rru.

i^iWvYteVraJ t\ saoj teaeueb mi TwoCtf tausfioe&^io <hjaekn kjji% m^ fhofhj TttuVfcwi 1 ^cJdreSSec) -Vo Mouf Wow) ofPtat CLivJer 4Vt (uarrui ai b/u/St PtfrtLScoJ ? To tee 8(WfiJ -\o m^ ftrl iio.oofl C# Plee&tlru.0U>3 BSel-P &ddre&a) £faynP l/»MaUl7Vne* BcefijuW-fan a** 0a^ JSmoeu D/at Z(*V3M mio Smbsc D/fte- 

## ^fT.^,001 \
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: DORIAN LAUTRET,

Relator. '

'

'

'

' No. 08

- 18

- 00096

- C V

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN HABEAS CORPUS

J U D G M E N T

The court has considered this cause on the Relator = s petition for writ of habeas corpus and

motion for emergency relief against the Honorable Mike Herrera, Judge of the 383rd District Court

of El Paso, Texas, and concludes that Relator = s petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for

emergency relief should be denied. We therefore deny the petition for writ of habeas corpus and

motion for emergency relief, in accordance with the opinion of this court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 13 TH DAY OF JUNE , 2018

.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4

                       Consent of Independent Accountants

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Amendment No. 6
to Registration Statement on Form S-4 of our report dated September 7, 2001
relating to the combined financial statements of the Gas Compression Business of
Schlumberger Limited, which appears in the Current Report on Form 8-K/A of
Hanover Compressor Company dated November 9, 2001. We also consent to the
reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Registration Statement.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Houston, Texas
February 11, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
EXTRACTED FROM ITEM 1 OF FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND
YEAR-TO-DATE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           8,428
<SECURITIES>                                    26,924
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,774
<PP&E>                                          18,465
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,557
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,944
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,933
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            9,837
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            75
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,289
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,944
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,889
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,202
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 228
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,313)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,313)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,313)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.44)


</TABLE>
#### COM. v. GALLIK, J.

1942 WDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/25/2017

CP-42-CR-0000199-2013

(McKean)

Affirmed