alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1  RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A) CERTIFICATION  I, Nurlan Janseitov, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Caspian International Oil Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and the internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the small business issuer and have:  a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions after the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  August 12, 2007 /s/ Nurlan Janseitov Nurlan Janseitov Chief Executive Officer  .
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0017

______________________________________

JAY WILSON PRESTON, COMMUNITYTEL, INC., RONAN TELEPHONE, INC., WESTERN 

MONTANA COMMUNITYTEL, INC., d/b/a ACCESS MONTANA, 

Defendants /Appellants/Cross-Appellees

v.

FRED WEBER and MONTANASKY NETWORKS, INC.,

Plaintiffs/Appellees/Cross-Appellants

______________________________________

ORDER

______________________________________

Before this Court is the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice, and 

the Court having read and reviewed the Stipulation and good cause appearing:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED the above-captioned case is DISMISSED WITH 

PREJUDICE.

Electronically signed and dated below. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 14 2022

03/14/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0017
November 3, 2016



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ANTONIO SEPEDA , Appellant

NO. 14

- 15

- 00728

- CV V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

______ __________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, The State of Texas, signed August 12, 2015, was heard on the transcript of the reco rd. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for ob servance.
### SERVED: October 6, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF DGW,Inc., d/b/a Melrose T-Top, Inti. DOCKET NO. FAA 2014- 0546 (Civil Penalty Action)

ORDER ON VENUE DGW, Inc., (hereinafter "DGW") filed a motion for change ofvenue from Louisville, KY to Chicago. The Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "FAA") filed an objection. We have a long standing tradition ofsetting venue convenientto the Respondent, herein DOW. DOW avers they are located in proximityto Chicago. WHEREFORE, it be and is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Venue shall be Chicago, IL. 2. We do not anticipate scheduling this case until after January 1, 2015.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service ListSERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur WrightBuilding-Suite 2W1000 1 ONE COPY Richard I. Williams,**Respondent',~** Counsel Griffin Williams LLP 501 W. State Street, Suite 203 Geneva, IL 60134 TEL: 630-457-1205 FAX: 630-262-0644 Christopher 

### R. Stevenson, Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AS0-7 Southern Region 1701 ColumbiaAvenue College Park, GA 30337 TEL: 404-305-5200 FAX: 404-305-5223 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (El1-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0546 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2WI000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          43,788
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  161,297
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               251,783
<PP&E>                                       1,669,323
<DEPRECIATION>                                 361,455
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,400,242
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          297,157
<BONDS>                                        304,376
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           485
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,609,325
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,400,242
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               327,027
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  250,241
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,848
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 90,554
<INCOME-TAX>                                    31,709
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             58,845
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    58,845
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2021217EN.01006501.xml

| 7.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/65

---

Action brought on 15 April 2021 — Kewazo v EUIPO (Liftbot)

(Case T-205/21)

(2021/C 217/82)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Kewazo GmbH (Garching, Germany) (represented by: P. Baronikians, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark Liftbot — Application for registration No 18 191 963

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 February 2021 in Case R 1160/2020-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | annul the refusal decision of EUIPO of 15 September 2020; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the refusal decision of EUIPO of 15 September 2020;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Nova Mud, Inc

. ,

Appellant,

v.

Sandra H. Staley, Individually as

Independent Executrix of the Estate of

George G. Staley, Deceased, and as

Trustee of the Tax Free Trust for Sandra

H. Staley

,

Appellee s

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 7

- 00 147

- C V

Appeal from the

109 th District Court

of Winkler C ounty, Texas

(TC# 15,683

- B )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the District Clerk ’ s request for an extension of time within which to

file the Clerk ’ s Record until December 20, 2017

. NO FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSION

OF TIME TO F ILE THE CLERK ’ S RECORD WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Sherry Terry

, District Clerk , for Winkler County, Texas

prepare the Clerk ’ s Record , and forward the same to this Court on or before December 20 , 201 7

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 20 th day of November , 20 1 7

.

PER CURIAM

B efore McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 9 , 2017

T0309 

# Order

Clerk March 9 , 2017

155416 & (24)(25)

JAMES SUTIKA,

Plainti ff

- Appellee,

SC: 155416

v CO A: 337144

Roscommon CC: 16

- 723378

- AS

ROSCOMMON COUNTY CLERK,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motions for immediate consideration and to expedite are

GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the Court of

Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that the

questions presented should be reviewed by this Court before consideration by the Court

of Appeals. However, we ORDER the Court of Appeals to expedite its consideration of

this case.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11(b)

                  ROADMASTER INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
            FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 29, 1997 AND JUNE 30, 1996
                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                                    JUNE 29,    JUNE 30,
                                                                      1997        1996
                                                                    --------    --------
<S>                                                                 <C>         <C>
Primary:
  Weighted average common shares outstanding during period            48,986      49,177
  Common shares issuable if all warrants had been converted
     at the date of issuance                                             833          --

                                                                    --------    --------

  Average common shares outstanding for primary calculation           49,819      49,177
                                                                    ========    ========

Fully Diluted:
  Weighted average common shares outstanding during period            48,986      49,177
  Net common shares issuable on exercise of warrants                     833          --
                                                                    --------    --------

  Average common shares outstanding for fully diluted calculation     49,819      49,177
                                                                    ========    ========


Loss before extraordinary item                                      $(27,578)   $   (503)
Extraordinary item - loss on extinguishment of debt                   (2,805)         --
                                                                    --------    --------
Net loss                                                            $(30,383)   $   (503)
                                                                    ========    ========

Earnings per share, primary and fully diluted:
    Loss before extraordinary item                                  $  (0.55)   $  (0.01)
    Extraordinary item - loss on extinguishment of debt                (0.06)         --
                                                                    --------    --------
    Net loss                                                        $  (0.61)   $  (0.01)
                                                                    ========    ========
</TABLE>






                                       23
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J OH NN I E L AM BE RT , P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. D A N T E F . V A C C A ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 11- 16855 D . C . N o . 3 : 1 1 -cv -0 0 0 9 3 -R C JR AM ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

N e va da R obe rtJ one s , C hi e f

Judge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d Jul y17, 2012 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , T H O M A S , an dS IL V E R M A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. N evada s t at e pri soner J oh nn i e L am bertappeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct c ourt ’ s or de rde ny i ng hi s m ot i on f orr e c ons i de r a t i on of

i t s di s m i s s a l of

hi s 42 U .S .C . § 1 9 8 3 a c tio n a lle g in g d e lib e r a te in d if f e r e n c e to h is s e r io u s m e d ic a l n e e d s .



# FI LED JU L 25 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 16855 2 W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w f ora n abus e of di s c r e t i on. Sc h. D is t. N o. 1J , Mul tnom ah Cnt

y . , O r . v . A CandS, I

nc . , 5 F . 3d 1255, 1 2 6 2 ( 9 th Ci r . 1 9 9 3 ) . W e a f f i rm. T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng the m ot i on f or r e c ons i de r a t i on be c aus e L a m be rtf a i l e d t o s how gr ounds w arr ant i ng r e c ons i de r a t i on of

the c ourt ’ s de c i s i on di s m i s s i ng L a m be rt ’ s c om pl a i nton the b a s is th a t it im p lic a te ds ta te to rt law c au s e s o f a c tio n r a th e rth an E ig h th A m e n d m e n t d e lib e r a te in d if f e r e n c e to s e r io u s m e d ic a l n e e d s . Se e i d. a t1263 (s ett i ng forth g roun ds for r ec on si dera t i on ); s e e al s o T oguc hiv . Chung , 391 F . 3d 1 0 5 1 , 1 0 5 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) ( n e g lig e n c e is in s u f f ic ie n t to e s tab lis h d e lib e r a te in d if f e r e n c e ) ; N

at ’ l A s s ’ n f orthe A dv anc e m e nt

of Ps y c hoanal ys is v . Cal. B d. of Ps y c hology , 22 8 F . 3d 10 43 , 10 49 (9th C i r. 20 00 ) ( expl ai ni ng “ w e m ayconsi der fa ct s c on t ai ned i n d ocum ent s att ac hed t o the com pl ai nt ” i n d et erm i ni ng w hether the com pl ai ntst at es a c l ai m for r el i ef ). L a m b e rt’s r e m a in in g c o n te n tio n s a r e u n p e r s u a s iv e . AF F I RME D.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-31564, 33-32683, 33-60785, 333-05399, 333-36430,
333-10060 and 333-85656), on Form S-3 (No. 333-88348) and on Form S-4 (No.
333-76536-01) of Lyondell Chemical Company of the following reports, which are
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

..    Our report dated March 10, 2003 on our audits of the consolidated financial
     statements of Lyondell Chemical Company as of December 31, 2002 and 2001
     and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002.

..    Our report dated February 14, 2003 on our audits of the financial
     statements of LYONDELL-CITGO Refining LP as of December 31, 2002 and 2001
     and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002.

..    Our report dated March 10, 2003 on our audits of the consolidated financial
     statements of Equistar Chemicals, LP as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and
     for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Houston, Texas
March 10, 2003
Docket No: FAA-2015-0679 Dir ID: 2013-NM-182-AD
(logo) TRIMONT

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Per the applicable ServicingAgreement for each of the transactions listed on Schedule I hereto, theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC, inits applicable capacities as listed on Schedule I ("Trimont"), herebycertifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2021 (the"Reporting Period"):

 

1.       A review of Trimont's activities duringthe Reporting Period and of its performance under the applicable ServicingAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

2.       To the best of such officer's knowledge,based on such review, Trimont has fulfilled all of its obligations under theapplicable Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period except as described in Exhibit A attached here to.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2022.

 

 

Trimont Real Estate Advisors,LLC, as Sub-servicer

 

By: /s/ Cindy Barreda

Name: Cindy Barreda 

Title: Authorized Signatory

 

 

SCHEDULE I

 

| **Transaction** | **Capacity** |
|-----------------|--------------|
|            |         |
| MSBAM 2015-C21  | Sub-servicer |
| MSBAM 2015-C22  | Sub-servicer |

 

 

EXHIBIT A

 

In June of 2021, Trimontself-identified certain instances from February 2021 to June 2021 in which bankaccount reconciliations were not completed timely and management conductedremediation of these errors. All reconciliations that were not completed withinthe required timeframe were completed within 90 days of the related month end.In addition, certain instances of noncompliance were identified in which escrowanalyses were not completed timely. Remediation of the problem is in process asof the date of this report.
DATE: 

SUBJECT: 

FROM: 

TO: 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON D.C .. 20460 

August 17, 20 15 

OFFICE OF 

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND 

POLLUTION PREVENTION 

Transmission of Background Materials and Charge to the Panel for the September 

15 - 18, 20 15 Session of the fiFRA Scientific Advisory Panel (SAP) Entitled 

.. Development of a Spatial Aquatic Model (SAM) for Pesticide Assessments .. 

Donald 

Director 

Brady, Ph.D. ~ 

Environmental Fate and ~ cts Division 

Fred Jenkins 

Designated Federal Offic ial 

FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel 

Office of Science Coordination and Policy (720 I M) 

Attached is a signed copy of the Background Document, Appendices. and Charge Questions to the 

Panel for the September 15 - 18, 2015 F1FRA SAP session: Development of a Spatial Aquatic 

Model (SAM) for Pesticide Assessments. These materials do not contain any information protected 

under statute as Confidential Business Information (CBI) nor do they contain information 

protected from disclosure to foreign and multi-national pesticide producers under F1FRA Section 

I O(g). Finally. these materials do not include info rmation protected by copyright. The attached 

documents include the following: 

Indicate 

Whether 

Document # Document Title Date FIFRA 

lO(g) or 

CBI 

Protected 

I Development of a Spatial Aquatic Model (SAM) For August 17, no 

Pesticide Assessments: Background Paper for the 2015 

September 15- 18, 2015, FIFRA SAP 

2-A SAM Model Component Conceptualizations (document) August 17, no 

20 15 
Indicate 

Whether 

Document # Document Title Date 

FIFRA 

lO(g) or 

CBI 

Protected 

2-B Comparison of Unifom1 Single Compartment to Non- August 17, no 

uniform Multi-compartment Approaches to Flow and 2015 

Mass Distributions 

2-C Test Basins and Monitoring Data Used for Model August 17, no 

Evaluation in SAM (spreadsheet) 20 15 

2-D Comparisons of SAM Outputs to Monitoring Data for August 17, no 

Selected Test Basins in 20 15 

(1) Mark Twain Basin, MO (spreadsheet) 

(2) Scioto River Basin. OH (spreadsheet) 

(3) White River (East Fork) Basin, IN (spreadsheet) 

3-A Description of Scenario Inputs Used in SAM (document) August 17, no 

20 15 

3-B General Land Cover Classes Derived from the Cropland August 17, no 

Data Layer (document and spreadsheet) 2015 

3-C Integrating Gridded Daily Meteorology Into Pesticide August 17, no 

Aquatic Exposure Mode ls (document) 20 15 

3-0 Crop Plant-Harvest Dates and Other Related Inputs August 17, no 

(spreadsheet) 20 15 

3-E Derivation of Curve Number for SAM (document) August 17, no 

20 15 

3-F Evaluation of Soil WQl Grouping Classes as a Potential August 17, no 

Replacement for Individual Soil Map Units in SAM 2015 

Scenarios (document) 

( 1) Comparison of Outputs for Mark Twain Basin, 

MO (spreadsheet) 

(2) Comparison of Outputs for Scioto Ri ver Basin, 

0 H (spreadsheet) 

(3) Comparison of Outputs for White Ri ver Basin, IN 

(spreadsheet) 

5-A Comparison of Outputs Based on Different Pesticide August 17, no 

Application Window Approaches 20 15 

( 1) Mark Twain Basin, MO (spreadsheet) 

(2) Scioto Ri ver Basin. OH (spreadsheet) 

2