alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-11192

Summary Calendar

 

JERRY ARAGON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

THOMAS HINKLE; SANTOS GARCIA; TONY ASH;

MELISSA L. ARESKOG; LONA CHEARIS; CRAIG A. RAINES,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:96-CV-36

- - - - - - - - - -

April 22, 1997

Before KING, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jerry Aragon (#376237), a state prisoner, has applied for

leave to appeal in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in an appeal from the

magistrate judge’s order dismissing his claims against several

defendants named in his civil rights action. The Prison

Litigation Reform Act applies to this appeal. See Strickland v.

Rankin County Correctional Facility, 105 F.3d 972, 973-76 (5th

Cir. 1997). Aragon has complied with the certification
No. 96-11192

- 2 -

requirements of the PLRA and his motion for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis is GRANTED. 

Aragon is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $0.17. 

Aragon must also make monthly payments of 20% of the preceding

month’s income credited to his account. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(b)(2). The agency having custody of Aragon is ORDERED to

forward funds from Aragon’s account to the clerk of the district

court in payment of the initial partial filing fee. Thereafter,

funds must be forwarded each time the amount in Aragon’s account

exceeds $10, until the full filing fee of $105 is paid. 

Aragon contends that the district court erred in dismissing

his claims against Thomas Hinkle, Santos Garcia, Craig Raines,

and Lona Cheairs for failure to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). We have conducted a de novo review of the

record. We hold that, as to the claims against Hinkle and

Garcia, the connection between their alleged actions and a

subsequent assault upon Aragon by another inmate was too

attenuated to support the conclusion that their actions were

causally connected with the assault or that Hinkle and Garcia

exposed Aragon to a substantial risk of serious harm. See Neals

v. Norwood, 59 F.3d 530, 533 (5th Cir. 1995). Aragon has failed

to allege that Raines acted with deliberate indifference to the

need to protect him from the risk of serious harm by failing to

move him to another cell after the assault. Farmer v. Brennan,

511 U.S. 825, ___, 114 S. Ct. 1970, 1984 (1994). Finally, Aragon
No. 96-11192

- 3 -

has failed to allege that he was prejudiced in his legal efforts

by the actions of defendant Cheairs. Henthorn v. Swinson, 955

F.2d 351, 354 (5th Cir. 1992). We decline to reach several

issues pertaining to defendant Cheairs raised by Aragon for the

first time on appeal. See Robertson v. Plano City of Texas, 70

F.3d 21, 23 (5th Cir. 1995). The district court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.

IFP GRANTED; JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
No. 11-10355.

#### Bryan *v.*Defense Technology, U. S., et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
p080471.en2.txt INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 08-0471 Post-Focus Draft 8/15/2008 Second Post-Focus Report 7/22/2009 ENGINEER: Arnold \ JAS PV (kg/yr):
SUBMITTER: USE:

OTHER USES:
MSDS: Yes Label: No

CRSS (06/23/2008): Chemical Name: S-H20: 130 g/L @ VP: 1.0E-6 torr @ MW: 211.35 %<500 %<1000 Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:

Consumer Use: SAT (concerns) (06/24/2008): Migration to groundwater: Negligible PBT rating: P2B1T1 Health: 2-3 Dermal, Inhalation, Eco: 2 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 200ppb), Page 1p080471.en2.txt XB Testing (Testing desired) OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2A NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW:
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 08-0471 Use: Number of Sites/ Location: Days/yr: Basis:
Process Description:
Page 2p080471.en2.txt destroyed, per submission/CRSS) ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium.

High End: to: from: basis:

Output 2: to: from: basis:

Output: to: from:

Output 2: to: from: basis:

Output 2: to: from: basis:

RELEASE TOTAL kg/yr - Page 3p080471.en2.txt
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis:

Inhalation: Exposure to Upper Bound: Number of workers (all sites) with inhalation exposure: Basis:

INHALATION MONITORING DATA REVIEW 1) Uncertainty (estimate based on model, regulatory limit or data not specific to industry): 2)a) Exposure level > 1 mg/day? OR b) Hazard Rating for health of 2 or greater? Inhalation Monitoring Data Desired? met) Dermal: Exposure to High End: Number of workers (all sites) with dermal exposure: Basis: Exposure to High End: Number of workers (all sites) with dermal exposure: Basis:
Exposure to High End: Number of workers (all sites) with dermal exposure: Basis:

Page 4
DexMedia2013123110-KEX10__DirectorComp




Exhibit 10.31


COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS OF DIRECTORS


The Compensation and Benefits Committee of the Board of Directors of Dex Media, Inc. (the “Corporation”) approved non-management director compensation, effective as of December 2, 2013, as follows:


	
				
	Service
	Fee Amount

	Annual Cash Retainer for Board Service
	

	$120,000
	


	Annual Chairman of the Board Retainer
	

	$145,000
	


	Annual Audit and Finance Committee Membership Retainer
	

	$7,500
	


	Annual Audit and Finance Committee Chairman Retainer
	

	$25,000
	


	Annual Compensation and Benefits Committee Membership Retainer
	

	$7,500
	


	Annual Compensation and Benefits Committee Chairman Retainer
	

	$25,000
	


	Annual Corporate Governance Committee Membership Retainer
	

	$5,000
	


	Annual Corporate Governance Committee Chairman Retainer
	

	$15,000
	


	Board and Committee Meeting Fee
	

	$2,000
	


	Annual Equity Retainer for Board Service
	

	$30,000
	







Non-management directors also receive annual award of the Corporation’s common stock equal to $30,000 divided by the closing price of the Corporation’s common stock on the date of grant.
Frank Hash, Mayor 

Phone: (870) 862-7911 

Fax: {870) 881-4164 

City of 

204 North \Vt>st Avenue 

P.O. Box 2170 

ElDorado, Arkansas 71731-2170 

www. GoElDorado.com 

ELDORADO 

September 26, 2011 

Mr. Dennis J. DeVany 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division, X-53 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Mr. DeVany: 

On April15, 2011 your department issued order 2011-4-15 and subsequently asked for 

comments. I responded by email, sharing with you El Dorado's desire to keep our 

service with SeaPort Airlines and listing reasons for our decision. Because the proposals 

did not address the high per-passenger subsidy at Hot Springs and Jonesboro, the DOT 

rescinded order 2011-4-15 and issued, on June 27, 2011, order number 2011-6-25. As 

the DOT has again requested comments from involved communities concerning 2011-6-

25, I am eager to respond. 

SeaPort has demonstrated on numerous occasions its desire to be a true partner with 

El Dorado. SeaPort has worked closely with our airport commission toward the goal of 

increasing enplanement numbers. This, I believe, should be the common goal for all 

three stakeholders, i.e. the community ofEl Dorado, SeaPort Airlines, and the DOT. In 

addition, SeaPort's on-time service, coupled with the courteous interaction between its 

associates and passengers, has resulted in many positive comments by citizens in our 

community. Consequently, we have increased our enplanement numbers as our 

community has embraced SeaPort's service. 

Moreover, SeaPort flies the Pilatus aircraft, a pressurized 260 knot turbo prop airplane. 

The Pilatus is faster, reducing flying time. It also delivers a more comfortable ride than 

the competition because of its ability to operate in suitable flight levels. 

Furthermore, our community desires service to Dallas Love instead ofDFW because of 

our need for access to a lower cost provider, i.e. Southwest Airlines. Finally, SeaPort 

provides ElDorado the best of both worlds by offering connections to both Memphis 

International and Dallas Love. 
Mr. DeVany, ElDorado has amply confirmed our need and support ofthe Essential Air 

Service program. To change carriers now would be a blow to the momentum so vital 

considering current economic challenges. As Mayor of the City of El Dorado, I 

respectfully request you honor the desires of our community and allow us to maintain our 

relationship with the current carrier, SeaPort Airlines. I appreciate this opportunity to 

register my comments concerning Essential Air Service for the community of El Dorado, 

Arkansas. Thanks for your consideration. 

cc: Mr. Kevin Schlemmer, Department of Transportation 

Mr. Josh Zylks, South Arkansas Regional Airport 

Mr. Jeff Teague, ElDorado Airport Commission
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income  Fund III,  Ltd. at March 31,  1999,  and its  statement  of
income for the three  months  then ended and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by
reference  to the Form 10-Q of CNL Income Fund III,  Ltd.  for the three  months
ended March 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1,044,255
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  219,575
<ALLOWANCES>                                   154,918
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         14,484,727
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,808,175
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 16,545,988
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     15,702,894
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   16,545,988
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               446,297
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  150,789
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                332,622
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            332,622
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   332,622
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Due  to the  nature  of its  industry,  CNL  Income  Fund III,  Ltd.  has an
unclassified  balance  sheet;  therefore,  no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         354,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  869,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    232,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,547,000
<PP&E>                                         526,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,193,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,240,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  8,676,000
<COMMON>                                    12,810,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (16,467,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,193,000
<SALES>                                      1,523,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,523,000
<CGS>                                          544,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,270,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             112,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,403,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,403,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,403,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)
        

</TABLE>
#### Christopher Lee MICHELSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Van DUNCAN; Stephen Coon, Asheville Police Detective; Mark S. Gage, ATF Special Agent; Ron Moore, Buncombe County District Attorney; Roger Theodore Smith, Buncombe County Attorney at Law, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-6931

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 22, 2018

Decided: February 26, 2018

Christopher Lee Michelson, Appellant Pro Se.

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Lee Michelson seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 545-47, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The district court has stated that, the identified deficiencies in Michelson’s initial complaint may be remedied through the filing of an amended complaint. Therefore, we conclude that the order Michelson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. *Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc.,*807 F.3d 619, 623 (4th Cir. 2015); *Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392,*10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).

Accordingly, we deny Michelson’s motion to appoint counsel and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and ar*316gument would not aid the' decisional process,

*DISMISSED*
# C_2021217EN.01004602.xml

| 7.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/46

---

Action brought on 26 March 2021 — The Smiley Company v EUIPO — SC Ha Ha Ha Production (SMILEY)

(Case T-169/21)

(2021/C 217/62)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: The Smiley Company SPRL (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: B. Fontaine, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: SC Ha Ha Ha Production SRL (Calinesti, Romania)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark SMILEY — Application for registration No 17 569 641

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 January 2021 in Case R 2936/2019-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 47(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 47(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 10(3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 10(3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council . |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council .

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                             260
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,415
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (353)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,398
<PP&E>                                          10,870
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,928)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,181
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,856
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           290
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           58,190<F1>
<PREFERRED>                                        451
<OTHER-SE>                                    (52,806)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,125
<SALES>                                          3,047
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,337
<CGS>                                            1,492
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      677
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   835
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  71
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    262
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (150)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,354)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     93
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,261)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.53)
<FN>
<F1>Represents Series A Redeemable Senior Preferred Stock that has a $10
liquidation preference and entitles holder to 10% annual compounded cash
dividend, no dividend paid to date.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8571 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8571

To direct the Secretaries of Defense and Veterans Affairs to update the 
  electronic health records of the respective departments to include 
 information regarding the deployments of members of the Armed Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 9, 2020

Mr. Rose of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred 
to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on 
 Veterans' Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretaries of Defense and Veterans Affairs to update the 
  electronic health records of the respective departments to include 
 information regarding the deployments of members of the Armed Forces.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``VA/DoD Deployment Interoperability 
Act''.

SEC. 2. INFORMATION REGARDING DEPLOYMENTS IN THE INTEROPERABLE 
              ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD SYSTEMS OF THE DEPARTMENTS OF 
              DEFENSE AND VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Secretaries of Defense and Veterans Affairs shall update the 
interoperable electronic health record systems of the respective 
departments (developed under section 1635 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-181; 10 U.S.C. 
1071 note)) to include the following information:
            (1) Whether the member of the Armed Forces or veteran was 
        deployed outside the United States.
            (2) The number of deployments described in paragraph (1).
            (3) The length of each deployment described in paragraph 
        (1).
            (4) Whether the member or veteran served in a theater of 
        combat operations.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Abcor
Products, Inc. (the "Company") certifies that:

1.	The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period
ended November 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

July 8, 2005                          /s/ Jeremy Feakins
                                      ----------------------------------------
                                      Jeremy Feakins (Chief Executive Officer
                                       and Chief Financial Officer)
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 25, 2022

No. 04-22-00125-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.C. and M.E.B., Children

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019PA01853

Honorable Rosie Alvarado, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

In this accelerated appeal, before the twice-extended due date, court reporter Judy Mata 

filed a third notification of late record requesting an additional ten days to prepare the reporter’s 

record. 

The request is granted. The reporter’s record is due on April 7, 2022. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 35.3(c) (limiting an extension in an accelerated appeal to ten days). 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 25th day of March, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court