### 08/11/2012 12:55 FAX 2024935142 FAA -> 

### OMS B6/ll/2012 07:07 d25227HI07 ANM7**~** 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 .9 1(,) 11 12. 13 14**~s** l6" 17 lS**l.~** 20 21 22 23 24 26 215 :n 2S**2~** 30 3'1 :l:a 33 34 35 3Ei '37 39 '39 40 •U 4:2 <\3**JEFF~Y'** 

### M. HARPER FAA 0:FPICB OF REGIONAL CotJNSlll. loOl.I..n-rD A"'f.aruE! SO'IJTHWESl" 

### R.EN"roN, WASHINGTON 98057 T.EL.EI'BONE: (425) 227-2161 FACSINln..E; (425) 227-100'7**.~q** 'i'" I I '.1! '· ;:**'"I'~** ' j



## UNITED STATES OJC' AMERICA DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASIDNGTON, D.C.

·In the Matter 

### l)f: 1o:seph Moesser

'Jb: Judge Good"Win: FAA Case No. 20IONM720001 

### DMS No. FAA-20J.1-l.286
JOINTMOTION FOR RULING 

### ON SECOND 

### MOTION FOR DECISION

Judge Richard C. Goodwin



## II+ accordance with 14 

### Code ofFedenJ Regulations (C.F.R.) 

### Section l.3.218(a) 

### (Rule 13.218(a)), 

### tb.e Administrator (CompJ..ainant) and 

### Respondtmtjointly 

### bring 

### this Motion for Ruling**~the** Motion for Decision. Both. Complainant and**R~eat** believe**tb.at_tb~** are no material fact!l 

### in dispute relevant 

### to the question ofliability.



### On 

### Februazy 14, 

### 2012, Compla:ioant filed 

### a Sc:eond Motion 

### for _Decision. DMS No. 

### FAA-.2011· 1286-0010. Respondent filed a response to 

### tbe Motion on 

### Febr.uary 27, 2012. DMS No. F .AA.-**2011-12~6-0013.** Com_plamantreplicd on March 1> 2012. DMS No.**FAA~20ll-1286-0011.** 

### This court deoicd the Second Motion for Deeision 

### in-its Order entered on March 7, 2012, !l'tating**··~espondent** 

### has offered a de1alled 

### and conceivable defense to Complainant's various contentions,"

. ' Ahbough the issue raised 

### by the section 

### ofthe Motion for Decision captioned 

### "Merils

- a. Respondent**fail~d** to show good cause,' was adjudicated**~y** the Court's order ofMaroh 7, 2012, 

### :; ·the 

### :rerniim.ng arguments and defense were .not, 

### reserving those issues for 

### resolution after a hearing. Bcrcvcver, a**~ew** of

### the pleadings and**disco~** in tbe case**d<:mon5trates~** and the 

### parties by

## this motion**agr~** 

### that the material facts relevant to the question ofliability 

### :in tbJs

case are not 

### in dispute. The defenses and arguments asserted by**b~th** parties arc purely o:nes of law.**~9** ·so

52 .!!.!

Join! MotioXI for 'Ruling on Sec:ol:ld Motion foe Decl$i<m, Jom:ph**M"~-** FA.A-;201 1-l:l.U 20 1 Om172000"l Page 1 of3 lS!'F'IlE'fM'. EARPER, FAA. AnQII.NFf "IU: {425) 227-2161; PAX: (425) 227-1007 @

### 002/004 PAGE 02/134

### OS/11/2012 12:55 FAX 2024935142 FAA + OMS 

### 05/11/2012 07:07 425227l0El7 

### ANM7

1 2 3**~** s 6 i g 9 1.0 ll. 12 13 :1.-!1 1.5 16 17 18 19 

### :zo ' 

## n 22 23. 7.4 :JS 2l: 27 !:til 2!lo )O**~1** ):Z 3:3 34 35 36 )' ;;!6 3S 40 1:1. 42 'l3 44 4.S**~s** 47 48 1!1 so 51 52 SJ The parties also believe the 

### questions oflaw raised have been 

### adequately briefed by the 

### Second Motion for Decis.ion. Respondent"s Responsej and Complainant's Reply, 

### and believe the 

### que...tton 

### ofliabi1ity {s ripe for 

### decision on a Motion for Decision.

The parties both believe 

### that tbc: qucs1icc of**sanctio~** 

### will be amenable to**scttl~ent** once the question ofliabilityhas been decided. 

### Complaimw.t and respondent agree that there are c.o 

### facts· in dispute 

### :relevlUlt .to tbe question of 

### liability; counsel 

### for 

### both parties respeetfu.ily request this court reconsider 

## itS order ofMarch 7, 2012, enter an order adjudicaring the question of

### liability, and 

### limit any bearing in tbis**c.a..~** to 

### the 

### question. ofan appropriate sanction.

DATED 

### this 

### ·:.1£. day ofJuot; 

### 2012. 

# 2.;:

__

ecca Skordas Counsel for 

### Respo!ldmt

JC>iut Motion for P..llling on Second Motion for Deci.9jon. Josepb Moesser-fAA·20ll·J2g6 Z010NM720001**Pag~2 of~**  JEFn..l,Y M. HAIU'l!ll, f:AA II.'T1'tlJUG:Y TEL.: (.US) 227-2161; FAX: (42S) Z27-1007 

### raJ 003/004 PAGE 03/04

### OS/11/2012 12:55 FAX 2024935142 B6/ll/2Bl2 87!87

. 4252271BB7

1 "Z 3 4 5 

### FAA 

### ANM7



## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ,. OMS 141004/004 PAGE 04/04

G 

### I hereby certify that the foregoing Joint Motion for Ruling on Second Motion for Decision has 1 

### been served via 

### facsimile and Certified Mail

- Return Receipt Requested this 

### date, to the Iii 

### follo-wing:

10 11 12 13 J.4 

### lS 16 J.7 16 19 :20 21 

## .n 23 24 :25 26 27 ::l.EI 2!1**~0** 

### ·n 32 ·33 J4**~5** 36 37 38 39 40 41 i:i! 43 

### u. 45 46 4? 43 49 

### so 51 ::;;2 53 

### Honorable Richard C. Goodwin Office ofHearings, M-20 

### 1200 New.Jersey 

### Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 · FAX: (202) 366-7536 

### Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

### Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wt 

### 000 Federal Aviation Administration · 800 Independence Avenue SW 

### Washington, 

## DC 20591 

### FAX: (202)**493~5020** 

### Gregory G 

### Skordas Skordas, Caston & 

### Hyde, LLC 341 South**M~n** 

### Street, Suite 

### 303 Salt 

### Lake City, UT 84

# t 11. FAX: (801) 531-88&5

Dated tbis 11 tn day 

### of June, 20 

### 12.

# ~u~fi}iri@U6 Dana SteEhenson Office ofRegional Coun.sel (ANM-7) 

### Federal Aviation Administration 

### 1601 LindAve_ SW Renton, WA 

### 98057 (425) 227-2164

Joint Motion for Rlllinz on Second Motion for Decision. J**C'>~eph** Mce5.3r:r- F AA-201 1- J2S6 JEFFREYM. HARPER,**FAAATT~** TEL: (425) 227·2161; FAX: (425) 227·1007 201 0l\llv.f72000] Pagc3 of3