alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 41 (Monday, March 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 9422]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5101]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER97-1615-000]

Portland General Electric Company; Notice of Filing

February 25, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 7, 1997, Portland General Electric 
Company (PGE), tendered for filing under PGE's Final Rule pro forma 
tariff (FERC Electric Tariff Original Volume No. 8, Docket No. OA96-
137-000), an executed Service Agreement for Non-firm Point-to-Point 
Transmission Service with Puget Sound Power & Light Company.
    Pursuant to 18 CFR 35.11, and the Commission's Order in Docket No. 
PL93-2-002 issued July 30, 1993, PGE respectfully requests that the 
Commission grant a waiver of the notice requirements of 18 CFR 35.3 to 
allow the Service Agreement to become effective January 24, 1997.
    A copy of this filing was caused to be served upon Puget Sound 
Power & Light Company as noted in the filing letter.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said application, 
should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before March 10, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-5101 Filed 2-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
No. 11-10445.

#### Woodson *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# ED U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

## HEARING DOCKET In TheMatter Of: SPIRIT AVIONICS, LTD. Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) 

### DOCKET NO. FAA-2014-0119 CASE NO. 2012-GL-07-0056

NOTICE OFAPPEARANCE 

### Please enter the appearance of Patrick J. Moro as co-counsel for Respondent, Spirit Avionics, Ltd., and serve him with documents in the above captioned proceeding at the address shown below.

Dated: May 28,2015 By:

# ~~~/1(~ 1 / 1

### PatricfJ. 

### Moro**~.** 

### / 6037 Frantz Road, Suite 107 / Dublin, Ohio 43017 / Phone: 614-798-1600 Fax: 614-798-1620 Email: pmoro@ehlawyers.com Attorney for Spirit Avionics, Ltd.I hereby certify that the foregoing Notice ofAppearance has been mailed this datebyU.S. Mail to: ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000

Ms. Kate Barber 

### Complainant's Counsel Federal Aviation Administration, AGL-7 2300 East Devon Avenue Des Plaines, IL 60018-4696 Judge J.E. Sullivan 

### US. AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 ONE COPY
U.S. ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION 

1201 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., SUITE 300 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005 

February 13,2012 

SUBJECT: Transmittal of the FY 2013 Interim Congressional Budget Justification and 

FY 2011 Annual Performance Report 

Dear Mr. President and Mr. Speaker: 

Attached please find the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) FY 2013 Interim 

Congressional Budget Justification and FY 2011 Annual Performance Report, supporting the request 

contained in the FY 2013 President's Budget. 

Please note that since December 11,2010, EAC has lacked a quorum of Commissioners necessary to 

do certain business, including the adoption of a formal budget justification. However, in order to 

meet our responsibility to submit to Congress timely information regarding our budget request, we 

submit the necessary information that would be contained in a formal justification but for the lack of 

a quorum. It is our intention to formally submit this document and its attachment to the Commission 

for a ratification tally vote once a quorum has been re-established. 

We flUther wish to note that pending the re-establishment of a quorum, and in light of the present 

fiscal situation facing the Federal government, EAC staff continues its work on a structural 

reorganization of the Commission that will allow the agency to meet its statutory obligations in an 

effective and efficient manner with less resources. 

When EAC first became operational in 2004, the small staff concentrated on the agency's statutory 

responsibilities to disburse initial Help America Vote Act funds to the states, and conduct mandated 

studies. As a result, the Commission received criticism that it was not certifying voting systems 

quickly enough and was not meeting some of the standard responsibilities of every Federal agency. 

Consequently, EAC responded by hiring staff with specific skill sets who established sound 

operating procedures in nearly all areas of operation. The agency is now in a position to continue 

exercising its responsibilities with fewer resources. 

We look forward to working with Congress and the Administration in the development of the 

agency's FY 2013 budget. 

Attachment 

Sincerely, 

y\ \2~ Mark A. Robbins 

General Counsel and Acting Executive 

Director 

Tel: (202) 566-3100 www.eac.gov Fax: (202) 566-3127 

Toll free: 1 (866) 747-1471
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2014-C26 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014- C26  Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2014 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"): (a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and (b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.  March 1, 2016/s/ Brian SmithBRIAN SMITHVice President   Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
# C_2021289EN.01005001.xml

| 19.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 289/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 289/50

---

Action brought on 4 June 2021 — TA v Parliament

(Case T-314/21)

(2021/C 289/67)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: TA (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare the present action admissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the present action admissible;

| — | order the annulment of the applicant’s appraisal report for 2019 and, in so far as necessary, the annulment of Mr Welle’s decision of 29 March 2021 in response to the complaint within the meaning of Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the annulment of the applicant’s appraisal report for 2019 and, in so far as necessary, the annulment of Mr Welle’s decision of 29 March 2021 in response to the complaint within the meaning of Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations;

| — | order the defendant to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging an infringement of Article 43 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union (‘the Staff Regulations’), Article 5(2) and Article 6(11) of the internal rules on the application of the general provisions for implementing Article 43 of the Staff Regulations, and infringement of Articles 15(2) and 87(1) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union. The applicant submits, in particular, that, by failing to take into account the absence of objectives set for 2019, the assessors disregarded the abovementioned provisions. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging an infringement of Article 43 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union (‘the Staff Regulations’), Article 5(2) and Article 6(11) of the internal rules on the application of the general provisions for implementing Article 43 of the Staff Regulations, and infringement of Articles 15(2) and 87(1) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union. The applicant submits, in particular, that, by failing to take into account the absence of objectives set for 2019, the assessors disregarded the abovementioned provisions.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging material inaccuracies in the facts which gave rise to a manifest error of assessment. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging material inaccuracies in the facts which gave rise to a manifest error of assessment.

---
No. 11-10369.

#### Brown *v.*Florida.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 5th Dist. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 4.3-D
                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                             HL&P CAPITAL TRUST IV


          THIS CERTIFICATE OF TRUST of HL&P Capital Trust IV (the "Trust"),
dated January 10, 1997, is being duly executed and filed by the undersigned as
trustee, to form a business trust under the Delaware Business Trust Act 
(12 Del. C. (S) 3801 et seq.).
    ------           ------

          1.  Name.  The name of the business trust being formed hereby is 
              ----
HL&P Capital Trust IV.


          2.  Delaware Trustee.  The name and business address of the trustee of
              ----------------                                                  
the Trust with a principal place of business in the State of Delaware are The
Bank of New York (Delaware), White Clay Center, Route 273, Newark, Delaware
19711.

          3.  Effective Date.  This Certificate of Trust shall be effective at
              --------------
the time of its filing.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the sole trustee of the
Trust at the time of filing this Certificate of Trust, has executed this
Certificate of Trust as of the date first above written.


                                       THE BANK OF NEW YORK (DELAWARE),
                                       as Trustee


                                       By: /s/ Joseph G. Ernst
                                          -------------------------------
                                          Name:  Joseph G. Ernst
                                          Title:  Assistant Vice President
#### IN the INTEREST OF: M.A.R., a Minor

574 MDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/18/2017

CP-67-DP-0000095-2015

(York)

Affirmed
#### Norma OLMO, Nelson Olmo, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DAYOL, INC., C.R. Bard, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-11784

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(February 7, 2018)

Justin Parafínczuk, Marcus John Susen, Koch Parafinczuk Wolf Susen, Fort Laud-erdale, FL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants

Michael Kevin Brown, Reed Smith, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, James Christopher Martin, Reed Smith, LLP, Pittsburgh, PA Edward M. Mullins, Reed Smith, LLP, Miami, FL, Eric L. Aexander, Jesse J. Ash, Matthew D. Jacobson, Reed Smith, LLP, Washington, DC, Edgardo Ferreyra, Jr., Luks Santaniello Petrillo *&*Jones, LLC, Miami, FL, Amy E. Furness, Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, PA, Miami, FL, David J. Walz, Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, PA, Tampa, FL, M. Patrick Yingling, Reed Smith, LLP, Chicago, IL, for Defendants-Appellees

Before MARCUS, ANDERSON, and HULL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We have had the benefit of oral argument and have carefully reviewed the briefs and the summary judgment record in this case. The learned intermediary doctrine provides that the manufacturer’s duty to warn runs to the physician, not directly to the patient. If the physician had independent knowledge of the risk that caused the plaintiffs injuries — substantially the same knowledge as an adequate warning should have communicated — then the plaintiff cannot prevail on a failure-to-warn claim. Christopher v. Cutter Laboratories, 53 F.3d 1184, 1192 (11th Cir. 1995). We agree with the district court that the physician who implanted the instant patch had such independent knowledge. With respect to the patch that was implanted in plaintiff, there is insufficient evidence that the ring in the patch buckled.

For the foregoing reasons, including reasons fully explained at oral' argument, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 66 (Wednesday, April 6, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 19985]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07317]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: April 6, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
March 29, 2022, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 738 to Competitive Product List. 
Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2022-49, CP2022-
54.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2022-07317 Filed 4-5-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 42 (Tuesday, March 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 9770]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5464]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System
Time and Date: 11:00 a.m., Monday, March 10, 1997.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, C Street 
entrance between 20th and 21st Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:

    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to 
the Board; (202) 452-3204. You may call (202) 452-3207, beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before this meeting, for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting.

    Dated: February 28, 1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-5464 Filed 2-28-97; 3:50 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
# C_2021138EN.01003701.xml

| 19.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/37

---

Action brought on 29 January 2021 — Stadtwerke Leipzig v Commission

(Case T-55/21)

(2021/C 138/48)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Stadtwerke Leipzig GmbH (Leipzig, Germany) (represented by: I. Zenke and T. Heymann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims the Court should:

| — | Annul the defendant’s decision of 17 September 2019 declaring the E.ON/innogy concentration to be compatible with the internal market (Case M.8870) (OJ 2020 C 379, p. 16); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the defendant’s decision of 17 September 2019 declaring the E.ON/innogy concentration to be compatible with the internal market (Case M.8870) (OJ 2020 C 379, p. 16);

| — | order the defendant to produce the M.8870 and M.8871 files concerning (i) the discussions between the defendant and the merging parties before and during the merger proceedings, (ii) the separate notification of the individual parts of the transaction, and (iii) its change of opinion during the proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to produce the M.8870 and M.8871 files concerning (i) the discussions between the defendant and the merging parties before and during the merger proceedings, (ii) the separate notification of the individual parts of the transaction, and (iii) its change of opinion during the proceedings;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the applicant’s lawyers’ and travel costs incurred as a result of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the applicant’s lawyers’ and travel costs incurred as a result of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law which are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-53/21, EVH v Commission.

---
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Cabinet Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2010 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ Glenn Geller
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date: May 17, 2010
34,894

0

6,236

41,130

BallotsCounted

0

BallotsRejected

NEW YORK

Mail,Fax,Email

Election/Registrar's

Office

Internet

DM

V

Public

Assistance

Office

DisabilitiesAgency

Military

RecruitmentOffice

OtherState

Agency

RegistrationDrives

Registration:Other

1,104,994

825,007

103,833

4

4,322

000000

RegistrationFormSource

TotalRegisteredVoters

16,200,892

SectionA-VoterRegistration

RegistrationFormsReceived

2,964,829

ConfirmationNotificationsSent

554,590

Polling

Place

UOCAVA Absentee Provisional

Ballot

EarlyVote

Center

Voteby

Mail

Turnout:

Other

6,759,193

402,150

0 140,198 0 0 0

SectionF-TurnoutbyMethod

CountedFull Counted

Part

Rejected Provisional:

Other

135,368

120,778

0 0

SectionE-ProvisionalBallots

UniformedService

Non-militaryOverseas

Other

SectionB-UOCAVA

8,467

38,115

0

46,582

BallotsTransmitted

TOTAL TOTAL

ProvisionalBallotTotal:266,369 TurnoutTotal:7,793,078

Note:Somefieldsmaybeblankorzeroduetodatanotbeingreportedor

jurisdictionsnotcollectingthatdata.

Select: NEW YORK

TOTAL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                          

  

2016EAVSDataBrief 

U i
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of
Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer
of VCA Antech, Inc.

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies this Amendment No. 1 to the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the Report) for the period ended June 30, 2003
of VCA Antech, Inc. (the Issuer).

Each of the undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officers, respectively, of VCA Antech, Inc., hereby certify that, to
the best of each such officers knowledge:



| | (i)  |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | ---- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Issuer.       

Dated: September 9, 2003

/s/ Robert L. Antin

Robert L. Antin
Chief Executive Officer/s/ Tomas W. Fuller

Tomas W. Fuller
Chief Financial Officer


57
February 7, 2003

Public Service Electric and Gas Company
80 Park Plaza
Newark, New Jersey 07102

We have audited the financial statements of Public Service Electric and Gas
Company and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002, included in your Annual
Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission and have issued
our report thereon dated February 7, 2003, which expresses an unqualified
opinion. Note 3 to such financial statements contains a description of your
adoption, during the year ended December 31, 2002, of a change in the method of
accounting to present certain energy trading contract assets and liabilities on
a net basis where the legal right of offset exists. In our judgment, such change
is to an alternative accounting principle that is preferable under the
circumstances.

Yours truly,

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey