alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Rescue Concepts, Inc.

, Relator

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 6

- 0 0 5 6 4

- C V

Trial court case number: 20 1 4

- 7 1 7 4 9

Trial court: 2 70 th District Court of H a rri s County

On Ju ly 18 , 201 6 , relator, Rescue Concepts, Inc. (“RCI”)

, filed a petition for a writ

of mandamus seeking to vacate the respondent trial judge ’s Ju ne 30 , 201 6 order granting

third

- par ty defendant Jones Lang LaSalle

— Texas, Inc.’s motion to compel the production of RCI , because RCI claims it discloses confidential attorney

- client communications, to direct the trial judge to enter an order denying such production, and

to tax cost s against real party in interest Jones Lang LaSalle

— Texas, Inc

. RCI included

in its mandamus record , among other documents, an order signed by the respondent , on July 8, 2016, granting RCI’s motion to stay, which would stay the June 30, 2016 order provided that RCI file a mandamus petition challenging that order by July 18, 2016.

With i t s petition, RCI also filed a motion for leave to file materials in camera , or alternativel y, for an order requesting in camera materials to be transmitted from the trial court. RCI requests that this Court either order the trial clerk to transmit to this Court copies of the documents that were submitted in camera to the trial judge or else gra nt RCI leave to submit authenticated copies of the in camera documents to this Court.

Accordingly, we grant RCI’s alternative motion to trans mit the in camera

documents to this Court. We ORDER the respondent, the Honorable Brent Gamble

, presiding judge of the 2 70 th District Court of Harris County, to direct the district clerk to make a copy of the documents RCI submitt ed in camera t o the trial court onto a USB

flash drive . We further ORDER the respondent to direct the district clerk to transmit th is

USB flash drive, via a courier or costs to be charged to RCI , to the Clerk of this Court in a sealed envelope marked, “S ubmitted For In Camera Review ,” with the above appellate cause number and style, within 10 days of this order

. Cf. T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 193. 4(a).Furthermore, t he Court requests a response to the petition for a writ of mandamus

by any real party in interest. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(b)(1). The response, if any, shall

be filed within 30 days from the date of this order

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 2, 52.4.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: / s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: J uly 28, 2016
September 15 , 2016



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

W. GARRY WALDROP DDS , INC. D/B/A LIFETIM E DENTAL CARE , Appellant

NO. 14

- 15

- 00747

- CV V.
GREGORY PHAM, JOHN M A , AND RAYMOND D A O , Appellee s

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee s , Gregory Pham, John Ma , and Raymond D ao , signed July 1, 2015, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore order the judgment o f the court below REVERSED and REMAND the cause for proceedings in accordance with the court ’ s opinion. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appelle e s , Gregory Pham, John Ma , and Raymond D ao

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-02-1998
<CASH>                                          54,485
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,510
<ALLOWANCES>                                        38
<INVENTORY>                                     82,851
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               145,552
<PP&E>                                          35,172
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,699
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 168,151
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,170
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                3
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     136,978
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   168,151
<SALES>                                         52,493
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,493
<CGS>                                           40,333
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,333
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,451<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (515)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        57
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (572)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (572)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.02)
<FN>
<F1>OTHER EXPENSES CONSISTS OF ALL OPERATING COSTS AND EXCLUDES INTEREST,
NON-OPERATING INCOME AND INCOME TAXES.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
2018 EAVS Data Brief: Florida EAVS Jurisdictions 

67 

Voter Registration 

Total Registered Voters, 

Nov. 20181 

14,126,722 

1 A1a of EAVS 

Registration Forms Received, 

E-Day 2016 – E-Day 20182 

6,541,838 

2 A3a of EAVS 

New Voters Registered, 

E-Day 2016 – E-Day 20183 

1,148,128 

3 A3b of EAVS 

Sources of Registration Forms4 

4 A4a-l of EAVS 

Mail/Fax/Email 745,997 

In-Person 928,182 

Online 488,804 

Motor Vehicle Office 3,124,822 

Public Assistance

Office 40,860 

Disability Office 2,950 

Military Recruitment 

Office 691 

Other Non-NVRA 

Office 37,056 

Registration Drives 519,330 

Other Sources or 

Not Categorized 653,146 

 

 



 Voter Turnout 

Voters Participating by Mode5 

In-Person E-Day 

2,954,737 

36% 

In-Person Early 

2,681,708 

Other Mode 

56,578 

1% 

By Mail 

2,585,359 

31% 

32% 

5 In-person Election Day 

voters is F1b. By-mail voters 

is F1d+F1g. In-person early 

voters is F1f. Other mode is 

F1c+F1e+F1h. 

Total Turnout:6 8,355,817 

6 F1a of EAVS 

Provisional Voters:7 6,665 

7 F1e of EAVS 

UOCAVA Voters:8 49,791 

8 F1c of EAVS 

Election Technology 

Technology Used by Jurisdictions 9 

65 63 

DRE w/o DRE with Ballot Scanner Hand Electronic 

VVPAT VVPAT Marking Count Poll Book 

Device 

56 

4 2 0 

9 F3a-d, F5a-F8a, and 

F11a of EAVS 

 Election Policies 

✔ Has online voter registration10 

10 Q6 of Policy Survey 

Has a form of same-day voter registration (SDR)11 

11 Q7 of Policy Survey 

Has all-mail elections statewide12 

Has all-mail elections in certain jurisdictions12 

12 Q9a of Policy Survey 

Allows voters to register as permanent absentee 

voters13 

13 Q10 of Policy Survey Requires excuse for by-mail voting14 

Requires excuse for in-person early or in-person 14 Q8 of Policy Survey 

absentee voting15 15 Q12a of Policy Survey 

Uses vote centers16 16 Q13 of Policy Survey 

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at 

www.eac.gov. 

Responses of “Does not apply” and “Data not available”

are shown as zeroes.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Franklyn Don HAMMONTREE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-30291

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed December 20, 2017

*877Lori Anne Harper Suek, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Leif Johnson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the US Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Franklyn Don Hammontree, Pro Se

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R, App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Franklyn Don Hammontree appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 48-month sentence for distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Hammontree’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Hammon-tree has filed a pro se supplemental brief. No answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief as to Hammontree’s conviction. We accordingly affirm Hammontree’s conviction.

Hammontree waived the right to appeal his sentence. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the sentencing waiver, we dismiss Hammon-tree’s appeal as to his sentence. *See United States v. Watson,*582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

June 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130312 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130312 

 COA: 262395 

Wayne CC: 99-002640

WILLIAM DOUGLAS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 6, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s0619 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 26, 2006 

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
first quarter 1998 Form 10-Q for LabOne, Inc. and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000816151
<NAME> LABONE, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      11,809,422
<SECURITIES>                                 4,971,572
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,596,802
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,198,537
<INVENTORY>                                  1,893,690
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            43,175,174
<PP&E>                                      45,033,004
<DEPRECIATION>                              33,698,225
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              59,861,879
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,648,118
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       150,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  51,063,691
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                59,861,879
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,333,434
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,958,948
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,296,583
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,296,520
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,000,063
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,000,063
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             11
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      65
<ALLOWANCES>                                        7
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  122
<PP&E>                                             40
<DEPRECIATION>                                     17
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    324
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             118
<BONDS>                                           114
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                         25
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      324
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,019
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     857
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    7
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 12
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    32
<INCOME-TAX>                                       12
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                20
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (12)
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                        8
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .35


</TABLE>
No. 11-9960.

#### Pinder *v.*Arkansas.

Sup. Ct. Ark. Motion of petitioner to defer consideration of petition for writ of certiorari denied. Certiorari denied.
# SectionB
# C_2022011EN.01003601.xml

| 10.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/36

---

Action brought on 11 November 2021 — D’Amato and Others v Parliament

(Case T-722/21)

(2022/C 11/49)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Rosa D’Amato (Taranto, Italy), Claude Gruffat (Mulsans, France), Damien Carême (Argenteuil, France) and Benoît Biteau (Sablonceaux, France) (represented by: P. de Bandt, M. Gherghinaru and L. Panepinto, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should:

| — | order the annulment of the decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 27 October 2021 on exceptional health and safety rules governing access to the European Parliament buildings at its three places of work; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the annulment of the decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 27 October 2021 on exceptional health and safety rules governing access to the European Parliament buildings at its three places of work;

| — | order the defendant to pay all the costs, including those relating to the application for suspension of operation of the contested decision. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all the costs, including those relating to the application for suspension of operation of the contested decision.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on four pleas in law that are identical or similar to those relied upon in Case T-710/21, Roos and Others v Parliament.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 26, 2009 

l1019 

Order 

 

October 26, 2009 

138485(21) 

 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138485 

 COA: 289235 

St. Clair CC: 08-000726-FH 

RICHARD JAMES MARTINEZ, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s June 23, 2009 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
#### Damien O. JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, LIVESAY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-7315

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 20, 2018

Decided: March 13, 2018

Damien O. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Alphonso Simon, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Damien O. Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition and denying his motion to reconsider. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate *282of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling -is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Johnson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8623 

To amend the CARES Act to clarify the inclusion of certain COVID–19 

vaccines covered under the Medicare program without any cost sharing. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 16, 2020 

Ms. SPANBERGER (for herself, Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota, Mr. 

FITZPATRICK, Ms. HOULAHAN, and Ms. SLOTKIN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, 

and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period 

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the CARES Act to clarify the inclusion of certain 

COVID–19 vaccines covered under the Medicare program 

without any cost sharing. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Securing Affordable 

5 Vaccines Equally for Seniors Act’’ or the ‘‘SAVE for Sen6 iors Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8623 IH

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE OF MEDICARE COVERAGE OF 

2 COVID–19 VACCINES WITHOUT ANY COST 

3 SHARING. 

4 Effective as if included in the enactment of the 

5 CARES Act (Public Law 116–136; 42 U.S.C. 13951), sec6 tion 3713(d) of such Act is amended by inserting before 

7 the period at the end the following: ‘‘or authorized for 

8 emergency use under section 564 of the Federal Food, 

9 Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360bbb–3)’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
# Official Journal C 106A/21 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 106A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6121 March 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 106A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6121 March 2018

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 106 A/01 | EUROSTAT — Vacancy notice for a Deputy Director-General function (AD 15) — Luxembourg (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2018/10378 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2018/C 106 A/01

EUROSTAT — Vacancy notice for a Deputy Director-General function (AD 15) — Luxembourg (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2018/10378

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN