alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 3.5

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                     NORTH AMERICAN TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.

     The undersigned, desiring to amend the Certificate of Incorporation of
North American Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"),
pursuant to Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,
DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

     The Board of Directors of the Corporation, at a meeting duly noticed and
     conducted on November 5, 2001, and the stockholders of the Corporation, at
     a special meeting conducted on December 27, 2001, have approved the
     following amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation:

     FIRST:  The first paragraph of Article IV shall be amended to provide that
     the total number of all classes of capital stock which the Corporation
     shall have authority to issue is seventy-five million (75,000,000) shares
     of common stock, par value $.001 per share, and twenty million (20,000,000)
     shares of preferred stock, par value $.001 per share (the "Preferred
     Stock").

     SECOND: That the aforesaid amendments have been duly adopted in accordance
     with Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

     THIRD:  That this amendment shall become effective when filed.

   IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment
to be signed by Henry W. Sullivan, its President and Chief Executive Officer,
this 27th day of December, 2001.

                                          NORTH AMERICAN TECHNOLOGIES
                                          GROUP, INC.

                                          By: /s/ Henry W. Sullivan
                                              --------------------
                                              Henry W. Sullivan, President & CEO
2018 EAVS Data Brief: Arizona EAVS Jurisdictions 

15 

Voter Registration 

Total Registered Voters, 

Nov. 20181 

4,276,891 

1 A1a of EAVS 

Registration Forms Received, 

E-Day 2016 – E-Day 20182 

1,860,596 

2 A3a of EAVS 

New Voters Registered, 

E-Day 2016 – E-Day 20183 

646,554 

3 A3b of EAVS 

Sources of Registration Forms4 

4 A4a-l of EAVS 

Mail/Fax/Email 289,533 

In-Person 16,826 

Online 479,722 

Motor Vehicle Office 888,201 

Public Assistance 

Office 8,125 

Disability Office 588 

Military Recruitment 

Office 2,865 

Other Non-NVRA 

Office 12,422 

Registration Drives 122,743 

Other Sources or 

Not Categorized 39,571 

 

 

 

Voter Turnout 

Voters Participating by Mode5 

In-Person Early 

44,417 

2% 

Other Mode By Mail 40,389 1,859,842 2% 77% 

In-Person E-Day 

465,256 

19% 

5 In-person Election Day 

voters is F1b. By-mail voters 

is F1d+F1g. In-person early 

voters is F1f. Other mode is 

F1c+F1e+F1h. 

Total Turnout:6 2,409,906 

6 F1a of EAVS 

Provisional Voters:7 37,371 

7 F1e of EAVS 

UOCAVA Voters:8 2,911 

8 F1c of EAVS 

Election Technology 

Technology Used by Jurisdictions9 

12

1

11 

4 

0 

DRE w/o DRE with Ballot Scanner Hand Electronic 

VVPAT VVPAT Marking Count Poll Book 

Device 

14 



 



9 F3a-d, F5a-F8a, and 

F11a of EAVS 

Election Policies 

✔ Has online voter registration10 

10 Q6 of Policy Survey 

Has a form of same-day voter registration (SDR)11 

11 Q7 of Policy Survey 

Has all-mail elections statewide12 

Has all-mail elections in certain jurisdictions12 

12 Q9a of Policy Survey 

✔ Allows voters to register as permanent absentee 

voters13 

13 Q10 of Policy Survey Requires excuse for by-mail voting14 

Requires excuse for in-person early or in-person 14 Q8 of Policy Survey 

absentee voting15 15 Q12a of Policy Survey 

✔ Uses vote centers16 16 Q13 of Policy Survey 

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at 

www.eac.gov. 

Responses of “Does not apply” and “Data not available”

are shown as zeroes.
# C_2021289EN.01004701.xml

| 19.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 289/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 289/47

---

Action brought on 1 June 2021 — Classen Holz Kontor v EUIPO — Deutsche Steinzeug Cremer & Breuer (new type tiling DRYTILE)

(Case T-308/21)

(2021/C 289/64)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Classen Holz Kontor GmbH (Kaisersesch, Germany) (represented by: M. Bergermann and D. Graetsch, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Deutsche Steinzeug Cremer & Breuer AG (Alfter, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Application for registration of European Union figurative mark new type tiling DRYTILE — Application for registration No 18 000 526

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 March 2021 in Case R 1227/2020-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the appeal proceedings.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# C_2021278EN.01006102.xml

| 12.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/61

---

Action brought on 21 May 2021 — Pejovič v EUIPO — ETA živilska industrija (TALIS)

(Case T-283/21)

(2021/C 278/84)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Edvin Pejovič (Pobegi, Slovenia) (represented by: U. Pogačnik, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ETA živilska industrija d.o.o. (Kamnik, Slovenia)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark TALIS — European Union trade mark No 15 632 871

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 March 2021 in Case R 888/2020-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | uphold the present application; |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold the present application;

| — | reform the contested decision in such manner to uphold the applicant’s appeal and reform the decision issued in cancellation procedure No 26 909 C of 17 March 2020 in such manner, to uphold the application for a declaration of invalidity of the contested trade mark TALIS and to declare the contested trade mark invalid in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

reform the contested decision in such manner to uphold the applicant’s appeal and reform the decision issued in cancellation procedure No 26 909 C of 17 March 2020 in such manner, to uphold the application for a declaration of invalidity of the contested trade mark TALIS and to declare the contested trade mark invalid in its entirety;

| — | in the alternative, annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul the contested decision;

| — | remit the case back to the EUIPO for further deliberation; |
| --- | --- |

—

remit the case back to the EUIPO for further deliberation;

| — | order EUIPO to pay all costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay all costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 8(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 8(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 63(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 46(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 63(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 46(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Transport Airplane Directorate 

1601 Lind Ave, SW. 

Renton, Washington 98057-3356 

June 24, 2011 

Mr. Steve Kincaid 

Gore Design Completion, Ltd. 

607 N. Frank Luke Drive 

San Antonio, TX 78226 

Dear Mr. Kincaid: 

We have received your petition, dated May 30, 2011. In that letter, you requested an 

exemption from the requirements of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 25.562(a), 

25.785(b), 25.785(h)(2), 25.785(j), 25.813(e), and 25.853(d). The exemption, if granted, 

would permit relief from requirements for general occupant protection for multiple-place 

side-facing seats, flight-attendant direct view, firm handholds in the passenger compartment, 

interior doors between passenger compartments, and maximum heat-release and 

smoke-emissions flammability requirements for large interior panels. In the petition, you 

requested the exemption for installation of an executive business interior on Airbus Model 

340-500 airplanes that would be operated for private use (not operated for hire or offered for 

common carriage). 

Your request, which you sent to the Department of Transportation’s Federal Document 

Management System, Docket No. FAA-2011-0584, will be processed by this office. We 

have determined that any grant of exemption in this case would not set a precedent. 

Therefore, we are waiving the requirement for Federal Register publication and the public 

comment period. Although we have waived the publication and comment period, you 

should not interpret this action as approval of your request. We will issue a decision after 

we have thoroughly analyzed your request. 

If you have any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, please 

contact Alan Sinclair, (425) 227-2195, alan.sinclair@faa.gov. 

/s/ 

Maria G. Delgado 

Transport Standards Staff 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

Aircraft Certification Service
No. 11-9453.

#### Giannini *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-9861.

#### Sampson *v.*Florida.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.
# Amtsblatt C 168/2018

| | ISSN 1977-088X |
| --- | --- |
| Amtsblatt
  der Europäischen Union | C 168 |
| | |
| Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache | Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen | 61. Jahrgang15. Mai 2018 |

ISSN 1977-088X

Amtsblatt

der Europäischen Union

C 168

Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache

Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen

61. Jahrgang15. Mai 2018

---

| Informationsnummer | Inhalt | Seite |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Bekanntmachungen |
| | VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN |
| 2018/C 168/01 | Aufforderungen zur Einreichung von Anträgen für die Initiative WiFi4EU (Förderung der Internetanbindung in Kommunen) im Rahmen der Fazilität Connecting Europe im Bereich der transeuropäischen Telekommunikationsnetze (Geändertes Arbeitsprogramm 2017 für die finanzielle Unterstützung im Bereich Telekommunikation der Fazilität Connecting Europe — Durchführungsbeschluss der Kommission C(2017) 7732) | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Inhalt

Seite

V   Bekanntmachungen

VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN

2018/C 168/01

Aufforderungen zur Einreichung von Anträgen für die Initiative WiFi4EU (Förderung der Internetanbindung in Kommunen) im Rahmen der Fazilität Connecting Europe im Bereich der transeuropäischen Telekommunikationsnetze (Geändertes Arbeitsprogramm 2017 für die finanzielle Unterstützung im Bereich Telekommunikation der Fazilität Connecting Europe — Durchführungsbeschluss der Kommission C(2017) 7732)

1

---

| DE | |
| --- | --- |

DE

---

V Bekanntmachungen

VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN

| 15.5.2018 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 168/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2018

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 168/1

---

Aufforderungen zur Einreichung von Anträgen für die Initiative WiFi4EU (Förderung der Internetanbindung in Kommunen) im Rahmen der Fazilität „Connecting Europe“ im Bereich der transeuropäischen Telekommunikationsnetze

(Geändertes Arbeitsprogramm 2017 für die finanzielle Unterstützung im Bereich Telekommunikation der Fazilität „Connecting Europe“ — Durchführungsbeschluss der Kommission C(2017) 7732)

(2018/C 168/01)

Hiermit veröffentlicht die Generaldirektion Kommunikationsnetze, Inhalte und Technologien der Europäischen Kommission die folgende Aufforderung zur Einreichung von Anträgen für die Initiative WiFi4EU im Hinblick auf die Vergabe von Finanzhilfen für Projekte, die mit den Prioritäten und Zielen übereinstimmen, welche im geänderten Arbeitsprogramm 2017 im Bereich der transeuropäischen Telekommunikationsnetze im Rahmen der Fazilität „Connecting Europe“ festgelegt sind.

Aufruf zur Einreichung von Anträgen für die erste Aufforderung (WIFI4EU-2017-1) zur Förderung der Internetanbindung in Kommunen.

Für die im Rahmen dieser Aufforderung auszuwählenden Anträge werden Gesamtmittel in Höhe von 17 745 000 EUR veranschlagt.

Antragsfrist: 15. Juni 2018.

Die Anträge im Rahmen dieser Aufforderung sind über das WiFi4EU-Portal einzureichen: https://www.wifi4eu.eu/

Die Aufforderungsunterlagen können von der INEA-Website abgerufen werden: https://ec.europa.eu/inea/en/connecting-europe-facility/cef-telecom/wifi4eu

---
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anthony D. Laday, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this
Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2017 of Fogo de Chao, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this Amendment No. 1 does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Amendment No. 1.



|                  |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|----------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 1, 2018 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Anthony D. Laday   
|                  |  |  |  |     |  | Anthony D. Laday       
|                  |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
# Borrower Defense

- Education Department approves $3.9 billion group discharge for 208,000 borrowers who attended ITT Technical Institute Today, the U.S. Department of Education (Department) announced that it will discharge all remaining federal student loans that borrowers received to attend ITT Technical Institute (ITT) from January 1, 2005, through its closure in September 2016.
- Statement from U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona on Sweet Settlement U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona issued the following statement regarding today’s filing on Sweet v. Cardona:
- Over 323,000 Federal Student Loan Borrowers to Receive $5.8 Billion in Automatic Total and Permanent Disability Discharges Over 323,000 borrowers who have a total and permanent disability (TPD) will receive more than $5.8 billion in automatic student loan discharges due to a new regulation announced today by the U.S. Department of Education.  The change will apply to borrowers who are identified through an existing data match with the Social Security Administration (SSA).
- Department of Education Approves Borrower Defense Claims Related to Three Additional Institutions The U.S. Department of Education (Department) announced today the approval of over 1,800 borrower defense to repayment (borrower defense) claims for borrowers who attended three institutions: Westwood College, Marinello Schools of Beauty and the Court Reporting Institute.
- Department of Education Announces Action to Streamline Borrower Defense Relief Process Today, the U.S. Department of Education  (Department) announced it will streamline debt relief determinations for  borrowers with claims approved to date that their institution engaged in  certain misconduct.
- American Career Institute Borrowers to Receive Automatic Group Relief for Federal Student Loans The U.S. Department of  Education (ED) announced today plans to grant borrower defense relief for  federal student loan borrowers who attended the now-defunct American Career  Institute (ACI) in Massachusetts.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Edwin Jeovanny GARCIA-CARCAMO, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40514 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 20, 2018

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Edwin Jeovanny Garcia-Carcamo, Pro Se

Before REAVLEY, CLEMENT, and HO, Circuit Judges.

*296PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Edwin Jeovanny Garcia-Car-camo has moved for leave to withdraw and ■has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Garcia-Carcamo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo-lous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY
2800 DEFENSE PENTAGON
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20301-2800

OCT 16 2023

MEMORANDUM FOR DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY WORKFORCE
SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2024 Alternative Dispute Resolution Policy Statement

The Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) is committed to using Alternative
Dispute Resolution (ADR) procedures to encourage the effective resolution of workplace
disputes. DSCA's Talent Management (TM) Directorate manages the Agency's ADR program
in partnership with the Defense Logistics Agency and in accordance with Department of
Defense Instruction 5145.05, "Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) and Conflict
Management," dated May 27, 2016.

ADR is a procedure used as an alternative to litigation to resolve issues in controversy,
such as complaints of discrimination, personal conflicts involving employees and supervisors,
and organizational issues. The ADR program is designed to efficiently facilitate conflict
resolution at the earliest possible stage of the conflict and at the lowest possible level in a
confidential, respectful manner. Workplace issues, including those stemming from simple
miscommunications, performance management disagreements, or personality-based
misunderstandings should be addressed immediately before morale and teamwork are adversely

affected.

Neutral third parties in ADR are experienced in techniques designed to facilitate
discussion and help participants achieve a mutually acceptable resolution. The services offered
by the ADR program include mediation, facilitation, and sensing sessions. Training on conflict
resolution is also available. To learn more about the ADR program, please visit the TM
Directorate SharePoint page at: https://dsca.sp.pentagon.mil/DAM/TM/SitePages/ADR.aspx.

Joven Pessidn

James A. Hursch
Director
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8229 

To require the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to issue 

a rule authorizing the Office of Hearings and Appeals to decide appeals 

relating to the status of HUBZone business concerns, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 11, 2020 

Mrs. RADEWAGEN (for herself and Ms. HOULAHAN) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To require the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to issue a rule authorizing the Office of Hearings 

and Appeals to decide appeals relating to the status 

of HUBZone business concerns, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Parity for HUBZone 

5 Appeals Act of 2020’’. 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8229 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY FOR THE OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND 

2 APPEALS TO DECIDE APPEALS RELATING TO 

3 QUALIFIED HUBZONE SMALL BUSINESS CON4 CERNS. 

5 Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 

6 of this Act, the Administrator of the Small Business Ad7 ministration shall issue a rule authorizing the Office of 

8 Hearings and Appeals of the Administration to decide all 

9 appeals from formal protest determinations in connection 

10 with the status of a concern as qualified HUBZone small 

11 business concern (as such term is defined in section 31(b) 

12 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 657a(b))). 

Æ 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with BILLS
Petitioner and Appellee, 

and 

HECTOR GUILLERMO SMITH 

Mac DONALD GONZALEZ, 

Respondent and Appellant. 

Bovven 

Clerk of Suptert,. State or Mr), 

ORDER 

Appellee Whitney Merlynn Peterson as filed a Motion to Waive Mandatory 

Appellate Mediation pursuant to M. R. App. P. 7(2)(b). 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter shall proceed without mediation. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all parties of record, and to 

the Honorable Wm. Nels Swandal, appointed mediator. 

DATED this day of April, 2022. 

For the Court, 

Chief JuStice