alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 1797

JAMAAL GITTENS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. TRANSFORCE, INC. , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Anthony John Trenga , District Judge. ( 1:18

- cv
- 01249

- AJT

- IDD )

Submitted : November 21 , 2019 Decided: November 25, 2019

Before KEENAN and DIAZ , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD , Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Jamaal Gittens, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Erwin Schuler, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Reston, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Jamaal Gittens appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to amend and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm fo r the reasons stated by the district

court. Gittens v. Trans F orce , Inc. , No. 1:18

- cv
- 01249

- AJT

- IDD (E.D. Va. July 16, 2019)

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this cour t and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
# C_2023104EN.01002201.xml

| 20.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/22

---

Order of the President of the Court of 2 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti — Romania) — VS, TU, RW v Ryanair DAC

(Case C-362/22, (1) Ryanair)

(2023/C 104/32)

Language of the case: Romanian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 368, 26.9.2022.

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8653 

To require consent for the Director of the United States Marshals Service 

to deputize certain law enforcement officers, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 23, 2020 

Mr. BLUMENAUER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require consent for the Director of the United States 

Marshals Service to deputize certain law enforcement 

officers, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keep Law Enforce5 ment Local Act of 2020’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATIONS ON DEPUTATION AUTHORITY OF U.S. 

7 MARSHALS SERVICE. 

8 (a) CONSENT REQUIRED.—The Director of the 

9 United States Marshals Services shall not deputize local 

10 law enforcement officers without the consent of the chief 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8653 IH

1 executive of the unit of local government for which the 

2 law enforcement officer is employed. 

3 (b) WITHDRAWAL OF CONSENT.—The chief executive 

4 of the unit of local government that provides consent pur5 suant to subsection (a), may withdraw such consent at any 

6 time. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8829 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8829

 To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
   issue regulations to require certain air carriers to adopt safety 
              management systems, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 2, 2020

  Mr. Allred introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
   issue regulations to require certain air carriers to adopt safety 
              management systems, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Brian McDaniel Helicopter Safety 
Act''.

SEC. 2. HELICOPTER SAFETY.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation 
Administration shall issue such regulations as are necessary to amend 
part 5 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, to require each air 
carriers conducting commercial air tours (as such term is defined in 
section 110.2 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations) to adopt a 
safety management system.
    (b) Guidance.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall issue guidance 
        to operators of commercial air tours (as such term is defined 
        in section 110.2 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations) on 
        determining if a passenger is intoxicated or impaired.
            (2) Consideration.--In developing guidance pursuant to 
        paragraph (1), the Administrator shall address unique risks, 
        regardless of aircraft size, when passengers are in proximity 
        to aircraft controls.
    (c) Prohibition.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Administrator shall issue such regulations as are 
necessary to prohibit air carriers conducting commercial air tours (as 
such term is defined in section 110.2 of title 14, Code of Federal 
Regulations) from operating under part 91 of title 14, Code of Federal 
Regulations, without an exemption from the Administrator.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet of CNL Income Fund III, Ltd. at June 30, 1997, and its
statement of income for the six months then ended and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to the Form 10Q of CNL Income Fund III, Ltd.
for the six months ended June 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,385,320
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  255,592
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,345
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      18,182,520
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,207,815
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,047,617
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,181,149
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,047,617
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,143,281
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  294,083
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,773,848
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,773,848
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,773,848
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Due to the nature of its industry, CNL Income Fund III, Ltd. has an
unclassified balance sheet; therefore, no values are shown above for
current assets and current liabilities.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
DISMISS and Opinion Filed April 8, 2022 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00164-CV 

THB CONSTRUCTION, LLC, Appellant 

V. 

CANTERBURY COVE, LLC, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-12084 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Reichek, and Goldstein 

Opinion by Justice Goldstein 

Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to dismiss the appeal because they 

have settled their dispute. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). 

220164F.P05 

 

/Bonnie Lee Goldstein/

BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN 

JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

THB CONSTRUCTION, LLC, 

Appellant 

No. 05-22-00164-CV V. 

CANTERBURY COVE, LLC, 

Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 68th Judicial 

District Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-12084. 

Opinion delivered by Justice 

Goldstein. Justices Partida-Kipness 

and Reichek participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

 Subject to any agreement between the parties, it is ORDERED that appellee 

CANTERBURY COVE, LLC recover its costs of this appeal from appellant THB 

CONSTRUCTION, LLC. 

Judgment entered April 8, 2022
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8723 

To condition receipt of State funding from the Bureau of Health Workforce 

on adoption by the State of the Interstate Medical Licensure Compact, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 30, 2020 

Mr. YOHO (for himself, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, Mr. TIFFANY, and Mr. 

HAGEDORN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To condition receipt of State funding from the Bureau of 

Health Workforce on adoption by the State of the Interstate Medical Licensure Compact, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONDITIONING RECEIPT OF STATE FUNDING 

4 FROM THE BUREAU OF HEALTH WORKFORCE 

5 ON ADOPTION BY THE STATE OF THE INTER6 STATE MEDICAL LICENSURE COMPACT. 

7 In the case of a State that has not, by the date that 

8 is 3 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8723 IH

1 joined, through enactment of a State law, the Interstate 

2 Medical Licensure Compact facilitating physician inter3 state licensure, as of the day after such 3-year period, the 

4 State shall not be eligible for any funds or assistance ad5 ministered by the Bureau of Health Workforce of the 

6 Health Resources and Services Administration of the De7 partment of Health and Human Services. In the case of 

8 a State that becomes ineligible for such funds or assist9 ance pursuant to the previous sentence, if such State after 

10 such 3-year date joins, through enactment of a State law, 

11 the Interstate Medical Licensure Compact, the Secretary 

12 of Health and Human Services may determine such State 

13 is no longer ineligible for such funds or assistance pursu14 ant to the previous sentence. 

15 SEC. 2. CONDITIONING CERTAIN PROFESSIONAL LICENS16 ING BOARD GRANTS ON PROVISION OF SPE17 CIALTY PHYSICIAN PUBLIC AWARENESS CAM18 PAIGN ON TELEMEDICINE. 

19 Section 330L of the Public Health Service Act (42 

20 U.S.C. 254c–18) is amended— 

21 (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as sub22 section (c); 

23 (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the fol24 lowing new subsection: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8723 IH

1 ‘‘(c) PUBLIC AWARENESS CAMPAIGN.—A grant may 

2 not be made under subsection (a) to a professional licens3 ing board that participates in the licensure of physicians 

4 unless the professional licensure board provides for a pub5 lic awareness campaign to encourage specialty physicians 

6 to practice telemedicine.’’; and 

7 (3) in subsection (c), as redesignated by para8 graph (1), by striking ‘‘fiscal years 2002 through 

9 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal years 2021 through 

10 2025’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       7,590,920
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,944,526
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,426,583
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,459,873
<PP&E>                                      33,622,496
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,706,450
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,808,354
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,517,890
<BONDS>                                      6,605,471
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       115,675
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,292,730
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,808,354
<SALES>                                     10,583,977
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,583,977
<CGS>                                        7,993,006
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,993,006
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,720,072
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             147,859
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,276,960)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   673,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,949,960)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,949,960)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE REPORT
ON FORM 10-Q OF BAYOU INTERNATIONAL, LTD FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> AUSTRALIAN DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  .6312
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,518
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              253
<BONDS>                                          3,913
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,388
<OTHER-SE>                                     (9,036)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,518
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   115
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 237
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (352)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (352)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (325)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
#### Effort ALEXANDER, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Jim HOOD, Attorney General, State of Mississippi; Desoto County Soil and Water Conservation District, Defendants-Appellees

No. 17-60569 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed March 9, 2018

Effort Alexander, Pro Se

Lee Davis Thames, Jr., Esq., Special Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Mississippi, Jackson, MS, for Defendants-Appel-lees

*436Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.-

PER CURIAM: *

Effort Aexander appeals the district court's dismissal of his civil rights case on grounds of *res judicata.*We affirm, because the test for *res judicata*is met. Aexander previously filed two lawsuits against parties who are identical to or in privity with the parties in this case on the “same nucleus of operative facts,” *See Test Masters Educ. Servs., Inc. v. Singh,*428 F.3d 559, 571 (5th Cir. 2005). The district courts dismissed each case in final judgments on the merits.1*See id.*Athough the attorney general was not a named defendant in the prior cases, in *Alexander I,*he represented the original defendant, and in *Alexander II,*the state of Mississippi was a defendant. Thus, the parties are identical or in privity. *See Russell v. Sunamerica Secur. Inc.,*962 F.2d 1169, 1173-74 (5th Cir. 1992). Further, Aexander’s claim that the attorney general violated his civil rights in asserting that Aexander was responsible for a disputed dam concerns the same “nucleus of operative facts” as the prior cases, as the district court concluded. *See Singh,*428 F.3d at 571. Finally, the claim could and should have been previously raised, as the attorney general’s office asserted to Alexander that he was responsible for the dam in 1996 and in defending *Alexander I. See In re Paige,*610 F.3d 865, 873-74 (5th Cir. 2010).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir..R, 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

1

. The district court dismissed *Alexander I*as time barred. *Alexander v. Desoto Cty. Soil & Water Conservation Dist.,*No. 3:14-CV-147-MPM-SAA (N.D. Miss. March 25, 2015), *aff'd,*616 Fed.Appx. 156 (5th Cir. 2015) (mem.) (per curiam). In *Alexander II,*the court dismissed as to the State of Mississippi for failure to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. *Alexander v. DeSoto Cty. Soil & Water Conservation Dist.,*No. 3:15-CV-179-DMB-JMV, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114740 (N.D. Miss. Aug. 26, 2016). Both dismissals were thus “on the merits” for *res judicata*purposes. *See*Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); *Steve D. Thompson Trucking, Inc.*v. *Dorsey Trailers, Inc.,*880 F.2d 818, 819-20 (5th Cir. 1989); *Daigle v. Opelousas Health Care, Inc.,*774 F.2d 1344, 1348 (5th Cir. 1985).
EX-1020



		

			 

		


		

			EXHIBIT 10.20

		


		

			 

		




		
			DRESSER-RAND GROUP INC.
		

		
			GRANT NOTICE FOR 2008 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTIONS
		

		
			FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Dresser-Rand Group Inc. (the "Company"), hereby grants to Participant named below the nonqualified stock option (the "Option") to purchase any part or all of the number of shares of its common stock (the "Common Stock"), that are covered by this Option, as specified below, at the Exercise Price per share specified below and upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Grant Notice, the Dresser-Rand Group Inc. 2008 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan") and the Standard Terms and Conditions (the "Standard Terms and Conditions") promulgated under such Plan, each as amended from time to time.  Participant must formally accept the Option grant within 90 days following the Grant Date specified by this Grant Notice; if the Participant fails to do so, the Participant’s Option will be forfeited and the Participant will have no further rights with respect to such Option.    This Option is granted pursuant to the Plan and is subject to and qualified in its entirety by the Standard Terms and Conditions.  The Standard Terms and Conditions may be accessed through Participant’s personal Morgan Stanley Smith-Barney Benefit Access® (www.benefitaccess.com)  account in the Plan Documents section.
		

			
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Name of Participant:

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Grant Date:

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Number of Shares of Common Stock covered by Option:

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Exercise Price Per Share:

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Expiration Date:

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Vesting Schedule:

					
					
						 

				



		
			 
		

		
			This Option is not intended to qualify as an incentive stock option under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.  By accepting this Grant Notice, Participant acknowledges that he or she has received and read, and agrees that this Option shall be subject to, the terms of this Grant Notice, the Plan and the Standard Terms and Conditions.
		

		
			 
		

		
			DRESSER-RAND GROUP INC.
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			By: /s/ VINCENT R. VOLPE JR.
		

		
			Name: Vincent R. Volpe Jr.
		

		
			Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
#### COM. v. NEWDECK, K.

974 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/27/2017

CP-15-CR-0001874-2015 (Chester)

Vacated
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(b)


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


      We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of this Registration Statement on Form S-4 of Plains Resources
Inc. of our report dated February 10, 1997 appearing on page F-1 of Plains
Resources Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1996.  We also consent to the reference to us under the heating "Experts" in
such Prospectus.


PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

Houston, Texas
August 12, 1997