alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.1



|     |  |                                                                                                             
|---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1050-084, 8th Floor 401
South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2015, by and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL
MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor,
CITIBANK N.A., as Certificate Administrator and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-GC27 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise
defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive
Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such
period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2018.



|                        
|------------------------
|LOGO                    
|Daniel Bober            
|Executive Vice President
|Wells Fargo Bank        



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
No. 11-10020.

#### Lovette *v.*Paul et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
UNMANNED AERIAL SoLUTIONS, INc. 

### Blue- Chip Unmanned Aerial Solutions, Inc. Attn: Clint P. Stevens 1965 South Beech St. Wichita, KS 67207 316-305-5498 April 22, 20 15 U.S . Department ofTransportation Docket Operations 1200 New Jersey Ave ., SE Washington, DC 20590 

### Re: Request to amend and allow for Blue- Chip UAS, Inc. the ability to utilize additional sUAS platforms under the same direction as provided within exemption #11172, docket# FAA- 2014-0787-0009, approved February 10,2015. Dear Sir/Madam, Dear Sir or Madam ; Blue-Chip Unmanned Aerial Solutions, Inc. (Blue-Chip UAS) was issued an exemption under Section 333 ofthe "FAA Modernization and Reform act of2012 " (the "Reform Act") numbered 11172 (the Exemption) for the purpose of conducting UAS operations within the oil and gas , agriculture, wildlife and aerial photography industries. Blue-Chip UAS, herby requests an amendment to the Exempt ion to allow an additional type of"Delta Wing" unmanned aircraft system (UAS) to be operated in full compliance with the conditions set forth within the Exemption . Blue-Chip UAS, requests permission to operate the following UAS based on their type, size, weight, and speed under the same terms and conditions contained within the Exemption and provided by the parameters set forth in regards to capabilities and limitations identified wi thin the Flight Operations Manual and Maintenance Manual attached as provided.Model Skywalker X8**~** Delta Wing 7ft Span Weight <10lbs Speed <60mph Blue-Chip UAS, respectfully requests the same finding from the FAA as provided to Aerial Mob, LLC as to their an1ended exemption numbered 11066A, docket ID FAA-2014-0353, dated February 2, 2015. As indicated, the FAA found the amendment request was not precedent setting, that good cause exists for not publishing a summary ofthe petition in the Federal Register and that any delay in acting on the petition would be detrimental to the organization. Thank y ou for your time in regards to this petition and please direct any correspondence to Mr. Clint Stevens.

Clint P . Stevens Executive Director & Co-Founder Blue-Chip UAS, Inc. 316-305 -5498

cc: Robert Pappas Kiera Jones John Barbagallo
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8566 

To require the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and 

the Securities and Exchange Commission to carry out a study on the 

racial gap in stock ownership, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 9, 2020 

Mr. MEEKS (for himself, Mr. LAWSON of Florida, and Mr. CLEAVER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 

System and the Securities and Exchange Commission 

to carry out a study on the racial gap in stock ownership, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STUDY ON THE RACIAL GAP IN STOCK OWNER4 SHIP. 

5 (a) STUDY.—The Board of Governors of the Federal 

6 Reserve System and the Securities and Exchange Commis7 sion shall, jointly, carry out a study on the racial gap in 

8 stock ownership. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8566 IH

1 (b) REPORT.—Not later than the end of the 180-day 

2 period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the 

3 Board of Governors and the Commission shall, jointly, 

4 issue a report to the Congress containing— 

5 (1) all findings and determinations made in car6 rying out the study required under subsection (a); 

7 (2) estimates of— 

8 (A) the percentage of stock ownership 

9 among the different races; 

10 (B) the aggregate amount of equity hold11 ings held by the different races; and 

12 (C) the per capita equity holdings among 

13 the different races; and 

14 (3) any recommendations of the Board of Gov15 ernors or the Commission for administrative or legis16 lative changes that could raise stock ownership 

17 among African Americans and any other group less 

18 likely to own stocks. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
### IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2022 ND 238

Terri Washington, Petitioner and Appellant

v. Job Service North Dakota , Respondent and Appellee and South West Mul ti County Correctional Center, Respondent

No. 20220269

Appeal from the District Court of Stark County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable Rhonda R

. Ehlis , Judge.

AFFIRMED

. Per Curiam

. Terri Washington, Dickinson, N

. D ., self

- represented, petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.

Michael T. Pitcher, Assistant Attorney General, Bismarck, N

. D ., for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.1 Washington v. Job Service No. 20220269

Per Curiam

. [¶1] Terri Washington appeals from a district court judgment affirming Job Service’s decision to deny her unemployment benefits. Washington argues that she was unlawfully terminated by her employer’s board of directors or its chairperson, that she was disciplined twice for one instance of misconduct, and that she was not affo rded a fair hearing. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5)

. [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
Exhibit 32.1

             CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRESIDENT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Harold Blomquist, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Simtek Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Simtek Corporation.



 /s/Harold Blomquist
-------------------------------------
Harold Blomquist
Chief Executive Officer and President

November 14, 2006
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

06/25

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 77.38 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★ ■

■

■ ■

★

●

●

●

●

★ ●

●

●

●
# C_2021182EN.01006501.xml

| 10.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/65

---

Action brought on 23 March 2021 — Völkl v EUIPO — Marker Dalbello Völkl (International) (Marker Völkl)

(Case T-156/21)

(2021/C 182/88)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Völkl GmbH & Co. KG (Erding, Germany) (represented by: C. Raßmann, M. Suether and F. Adinolfi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Marker Dalbello Völkl (International) GmbH (Baar, Switzerland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark Marker Völkl — International registration designating the European Union No W00891106

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 January 2021 in Case R 0055/2020-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order the defendant and the other party, should it intervene, to pay the costs of these proceedings and of the earlier appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant and the other party, should it intervene, to pay the costs of these proceedings and of the earlier appeal proceedings.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and (4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and (4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8448 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8448

  To prohibit certain signatures on checks and notices issued by the 
          Department of the Treasury, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 30, 2020

  Mr. Cohen introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit certain signatures on checks and notices issued by the 
          Department of the Treasury, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SIGNATURES ON CHECKS AND NOTICES, ETC., BY THE DEPARTMENT OF 
              THE TREASURY.

    Any check issued to an individual by the Department of the Treasury 
pursuant to section 6428 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and any 
notice issued pursuant to section 6428(f)(6) of such Code, may not be 
signed by or otherwise bear the name, signature, image or likeness of 
the President, the Vice President or any elected official or cabinet 
level officer of the United States, or any individual who, with respect 
to any of the aforementioned individuals, bears any relationship 
described in subparagraphs (A) through (G) of section 152(d)(2) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
                                 <all>
```
EX-10.7



 Exhibit 10.7 

March 21, 2014 
 Michael D. Clayman, M.D. 

RE: Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Offer Letter 

Dear Mike: 
 Reference is made to that certain
letter agreement (the “Agreement”), dated August 28, 2013, by and between you and Flexion Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”), which sets forth the terms of your employment with Flexion. This
letter agreement (this “Amendment”) shall serve as an amendment to the Agreement. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement. 

Upon your execution of this Amendment in the space provided below, the Agreement shall be amended as follows: 

 

	 	1.	The penultimate sentence of Section 3 of the Agreement shall be replaced with the following two sentences: 


“Your target bonus shall be fifty percent (50%) of your Base Salary for the applicable year. Your target bonus will be reviewed
periodically by the Board or the Compensation Committee of the Board and may be adjusted upwards, but may not be reduced while you are employed pursuant to this Agreement without your consent.” 

 

	 	2.	Section 7(b)(i) of the Agreement shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows: 


“(i) You shall continue to receive your then-current Base Salary (ignoring any decrease that forms the basis for your termination for
Good Reason, if applicable), less standard deductions and withholdings, for eighteen (18) months following the date of termination (the “Severance Period”).” 

 

	 	3.	Section 7(b)(iii) of the Agreement shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows: 


“(iii) The vesting of your outstanding unvested equity awards that were granted prior to February 25, 2014 shall accelerate to the
extent such awards are subject to time-based vesting requirements and as if you had completed an additional twelve (12) months of service with the Company as of the date of termination.” 

Except for the matters set forth in this Amendment, all other terms of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. 

If the foregoing correctly conforms to your understanding of the agreement between you and the Company, please sign and date the enclosed copy
of this letter agreement and return it to us. 








	
	Very truly yours,
	
	Flexion Therapeutics, Inc.
	
	 /s/ Frederick W. Driscoll

	Frederick W. Driscoll
	Chief Financial Officer
	
	Accepted and agreed:
	
	 /s/ Michael D. Clayman, M.D.

	Michael D. Clayman, M.D.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ No. 1D 18

- 1024

_____________________________ C RISTINA T ARANTOLA , M.D. , Petitioner ,

v.
W ILLIAM B. H ENGHOLD , M.D

. , P.A. , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Prohibition

– Original Jurisdiction. August 30, 2018

P ER C URIAM

. D ENIED

. L EWIS , M AKAR , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur
.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Todd M. Ladouceur and Chris K. Ritchie of Galloway, Johnson, Tompkins, Burr & Smith, P.L.C., Pensacola , for Petitioner

. Jeremy C. Branni ng and Daniel E. Harrell of Clark Partington, Pensacola , for Respondent

.
FrankHash, Mayor Phone: (870) 862-7911 Fax: {870) 881-4164 

# City

# of 204North \Vt>stAvenue P.O. Box2170 ElDorado,Arkansas 71731-2170

www.GoElDorado.com 

# ELDORADO

September26, 2011

Mr. Dennis J. DeVany Chief, Essential Air Service Division, X-53 Office ofAviation Analysis United States Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Ave SE Washington, DC 20590

Mr. DeVany:

OnApril15, 2011 your department issued order 2011-4-15 and subsequently asked for comments. Iresponded by email, sharing with you El Dorado's desire to keep our service with SeaPortAirlines and listing reasons for our decision. Because the proposals did not address the high per-passenger subsidy at Hot Springs and Jonesboro, the DOT rescinded order 2011-4-15 and issued, on June 27, 2011, order number 2011-6-25. As the DOT has again requested comments from involved communities concerning 2011-6- 25, I am eagerto respond.

SeaPorthas demonstrated onnumerous occasions its desire to be a true partnerwith El Dorado. SeaPort has worked closely with our airport commissiontoward the goal of increasing enplanementnumbers. This, I believe, should be the common goal for all three stakeholders, i.e. the community ofElDorado, SeaPort Airlines, and the DOT. In addition, SeaPort's on-time service, coupled with the courteous interaction between its associates and passengers, has resulted in many positive comments by citizens in our community. Consequently, we have increased our enplanement numbers as our community has embraced SeaPort's service.

Moreover, SeaPort flies the Pilatus aircraft, apressurized 260 knot turbo prop airplane. The Pilatus is faster, reducing flying time. It also delivers a more comfortable ride than the competitionbecause ofits ability to operate in suitable flight levels.

Furthermore, our community desires service to Dallas Love instead ofDFWbecause of

ourneed for access to a lower costprovider, i.e. Southwest Airlines. Finally, SeaPort provides ElDorado the best ofboth worlds by offering connections to both Memphis International and Dallas Love.Mr. DeVany, ElDorado has amply confirmed our need and support oftheEssential Air Service program. To change carriers now wouldbe a blowto the momentum so vital considering current economic challenges. As Mayor ofthe City ofEl Dorado, I respectfully request you honor the desires ofour community and allow us to maintain our relationship with the current carrier, SeaPort Airlines. I appreciate this opportunityto register my comments concerning Essential Air Service for the community ofEl Dorado, Arkansas. Thanks for your consideration.

cc: Mr. Kevin Schlemmer, Department ofTransportation Mr. JoshZylks, South Arkansas Regional Airport Mr. JeffTeague, ElDorado Airport Commission
INVITATION: SNAP STAKEHOLDER MEETING 

Hosted By: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Air and 

Radiation, Office of Atmospheric Programs, Stratospheric Protection Division

Date: September 11, 2015

Time: 9:30 a.m. – 11:30 a.m. (please plan to arrive by 9:00 a.m. to sign in) 

Location: Washington Marriott at Metro Center, 775 12th Street, NW, 

Washington, DC 20005 

Background: EPA is hosting a meeting for interested stakeholders to exchange 

information on the Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program. During 

the past 12 months, EPA has taken four separate actions under the SNAP program, 

to support the President’s June 2013 Climate Action Plan, which directs EPA to 

“use its authority through the Significant New Alternatives Policy Program to 

encourage private sector investment in low-emissions technology by identifying 

and approving climate-friendly chemicals while prohibiting certain uses of the 

most harmful chemical alternatives.” As part of SNAP’s continuous efforts, we are 

seeking to engage with stakeholders as we consider various next steps. 

Logistics: Please RSVP by September 4th to Paul-Harvey Weiner with a direct 

reply to this e-mail (weiner.paul-harvey@epa.gov) or by telephone at (202) 343-

9740. Please include your name and affiliation. You are welcome to share this 

invitation with other interested participants; however, please ask them to RSVP by 

September 4th as well. We look forward to a productive and informative meeting.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.55
                                                                   -------------

            EXTENDED AGREEMENT BETWEEN URO-TECH, LTD. ("URO-TECH")
                                      AND
                       POSITRON CORPORATION ("POSITRON")

This extension of the agreement between Positron Corporation and Uro-Tech, Ltd. 
will have the following conditions:

Extension Term:               Seventy-nine (79) days from date of original
--------------                expiration (April 30, 1997) of the Loan Agreement.


Loan Amount:                  A line of credit of up to $663,000.
-----------

Interest:                     Prime + 1%
--------

Collateral:                   As specified in the original agreement and amended
----------                    by the Inter-creditor agreement with ProFutures
                              Bridge Capital Fund, L.P. and Boston Financial &
                              Equity Corporation.

Subordination:                As specified in the original agreement and amended
-------------                 by the Inter-creditor Agreement with ProFutures
                              Bridge Capital Fund, L.P. and Boston Financial &
                              Equity Corporation.

If the foregoing is acceptable to Uro-Tech, Ltd., please respond by signing this
extension letter in the space provided below.

URO-TECH                                          POSITRON CORPORATION

By: /s/ Gary B. Wood, Ph.D.                  By: /s/ David O. Rodrigue
   -------------------------------              -------------------------------
        Gary B. Wood                                 David O. Rodrigue
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             178
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     5000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  5178
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    5178
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            97763
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          3292
<OTHER-SE>                                     (95877)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      5178
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   188867
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (188867)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (188867)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (188867)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>