alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       3,559,551
<SECURITIES>                                   100,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,607,257
<ALLOWANCES>                                   186,463
<INVENTORY>                                  3,743,359
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,429,223
<PP&E>                                      11,950,835
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,045,025
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,601,010
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,129,744
<BONDS>                                        387,769
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          476,236
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,080,028
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,601,010
<SALES>                                     13,038,671
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,038,671
<CGS>                                        5,901,657
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,366,031
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,587,265
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                45,391
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,112
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,253,112
<INCOME-TAX>                                   370,119
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            882,993
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   882,993
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 41 (Monday, March 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 9455]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5202]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Agency Information Collection Activities Under OMB Review

AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this 
notice announces that the Information Collection Request (ICR) named 
below has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
for review and comment. The ICR describes the nature of the information 
collection and its expected cost and burden; it includes the actual 
data collection instrument.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before April 2, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR A COPY CONTACT: Marijean Brown at NCUA (703) 
518-6413.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Title: Community Development Revolving Loan Program for Credit 
Unions, Application for Technical Assistance (OMB Control No. 3133-
0137). This is a request for an extension of a currently approved 
information collection. The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day 
comment period soliciting comments on this collection of information 
was published on December 23, 1996. No comments were received.
    Send comments including suggestions for reducing the burden to the 
following addresses: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th St., Washington, DC 20503, 
Attn: Desk Officer Alexander Hunt and NCUA, 1775 Duke St., Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428, Attn: Marijean Brown. Please refer to OMB Control No. 
3133-0137.

    By the National Credit Union Administration Board on February 
26, 1997.
Becky Baker,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-5202 Filed 2-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-U
# Teacher Education

- Raise the Bar: Eliminate the Educator Shortage Goal: Eliminate the educator shortage for every school by ensuring that schools are appropriately staffed, paying educators competitively, and strengthening pathways into the profession.
- Department of Education Makes $8 Million in New Grants Available to Help Colleges Strengthen and Diversify the Teacher Workforce Today, the U.S. Department of Education announced a new $8 million grant competition aimed at increasing the diversity of the teacher workforce and preparing teachers to meet the needs of our most underserved students.
- U.S. Education Secretary Miguel Cardona Calls on States, Districts, Higher Ed Institutions to Address Nationwide Teacher Shortage and Bolster Student Recovery with American Rescue Plan Funds Today, U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona will issue a nationwide call to action for states, higher education leaders, and schools to tap federal resources and work together to address the teacher shortage and aid student recovery.
- FACT SHEET:  The U.S. Department of Education Announces Partnerships Across States, School Districts, and Colleges of Education to Meet Secretary Cardona's Call to Action to Address the Teacher Shortage Institutions and System Leaders will Increase the Number of Teacher Candidates Prepared to Enter the Profession and Support Schools in the Fall and Beyond
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN R. DURRUTHY; JUANA 

DURRUTHY, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

 v. 

MTC FINANCIAL, INC., DBA Trustee 

Corps; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-55512 

D.C. No. 3:17-cv-00055-AJB-BGS 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Anthony J. Battaglia, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 18, 2017**

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Juan R. Durruthy and Juana Durruthy appeal pro se from the district court’s 

judgment dismissing their action alleging federal claims for failure to pay the filing 

fee after denying their motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We have jurisdiction 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 26 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-55512 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

Because the Durruthys have failed to address on appeal how the district 

court erred in dismissing their action, they have waived their challenge to the 

district court’s dismissal for failure to pay the filing fee. See Smith v. Marsh, 194 

F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[O]n appeal, arguments not raised by a party in 

its opening brief are deemed waived.”).

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       5,371,327
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,321,119
<ALLOWANCES>                                   150,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,641,175
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,355,978
<PP&E>                                      45,989,762
<DEPRECIATION>                              22,032,272
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              46,740,635
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,316,065
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        54,553
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,968,684
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                46,740,635
<SALES>                                     23,294,442
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,294,442
<CGS>                                       19,128,404
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,128,404
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                59,923
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,799,520
<INCOME-TAX>                                   895,846
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,903,674
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,903,674
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I,
the undersigned officer of the Cabinet Acquisition
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify to my
knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2006 of the Company fully complies,
in all material respects, with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and the information contained in the Report
fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer

Date: November 13, 2006
<PAGE>

                       [LETTERHEAD - RYDER SCOTT COMPANY]



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.8


                      Consent of Ryder Scott Company, L.P.

     As independent oil and gas consultants, Ryder Scott Company, L.P. hereby
consents to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on
Form S-4, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about
February 12, 2003, of information from our reserve reports for 3TEC Energy
Corporation as of December 31, 2001, December 31, 2000 and December 31, 1999. We
further consent to references to our firm under the subsection Experts and in
the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated February 2, 2003 in regards to reserve
reporting as of December 31, 2002.



                                         /s/ Ryder Scott Company, L.P.
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.




Houston, Texas
February 12, 2003
EXHIBIT 32

                         CERTIFICATION OF 10-QSB REPORT
                                       OF
                         CHADMOORE WIRELESS GROUP, INC.
                       FOR THE QUARTER ENDED June 30, 2004



1.       The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
         Officer of Chadmoore  Wireless Group,  Inc. This  Certification is made
         pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002.  This
         Certification  accompanies  the  10-QSB  Report of  Chadmoore  Wireless
         Group, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2004.



2.       We certify that such 10-QSB Report fully complies with the requirements
         of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and
         that the information  contained in such 10-QSB Report fairly  presents,
         in all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of
         operations of Chadmoore Wireless Group, Inc.



This Certification is executed as of August 12, 2004.



                                /s/ Robert W. Moore
                                ----------------------------------------
                                Robert W. Moore, Chief Executive Officer



                                /s/ Stephen K. Radusch
                                --------------------------------------------
                                Stephen K. Radusch, Chief Financial Officer



                                        A  signed   original  of  this   written
                                        statement  required  by Section  906 has
                                        been  provided  to  Chadmoore   Wireless
                                        Group,  Inc.  and  will be  retained  by
                                        Chadmoore   Wireless  Group,   Inc.  and
                                        furnished  to  the  Securities  Exchange
                                        Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 99

        Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
                            of the United States Code

     I, E. James Ferland, Chief Executive Officer of PSEG Power LLC, to the best
of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Annual Report of PSEG Power LLC on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of PSEG Power LLC.


                                        /s/ E. James Ferland
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        E. James Ferland
                                        PSEG Power LLC
                                        Chairman of the Board and Chief
                                        Executive Officer
                                        February 25, 2003
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2010-NM-182-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 44 (Thursday, March 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5485]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. RP95-196-000, et al. and RP95-392-000 (Consolidated)]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, UGI Utilities v. Columbia 
Gulf Transmission Company, et al.; Notice of Informal Settlement 
Conference

February 28, 1997.
    Take notice that an informal settlement conference in this 
proceeding will be convened on Thursday, March 6, 1997, at 10:00 a.m. 
The settlement conference will be held at the offices of the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, for the purpose of exploring the possible settlement of the 
above referenced docket.
    Any party, as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), or any participant as 
defined in 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to attend. Persons wishing to 
become a party must move to intervene and receive intervenor status 
pursuant to the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 385.214).
    For additional information, contact Thomas J. Burgess at 208-2058 
or David R. Cain at 208-0917.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-5485 Filed 3-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-4157

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CHRISTOPHER R. WOODBERRY,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 03-4333

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CHRISTOPHER R. WOODBERRY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District

Judge; Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (CR-99-168; CR-02-40)

Submitted: December 22, 2003 Decided: February 3, 2004

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
- 2 -

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher R. Woodberry, Appellant Pro Se. William Earl Day, II,

Rose Mary Parham, Assistant United States Attorneys, Florence,

South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Woodberry appeals from the two judgments of

the district court convicting him of conspiring to distribute

cocaine and ecstasy and possessing a firearm as a convicted felon,

in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846 (2000), and 18 U.S.C.

§ 922(g) (2000) (No. 03-4333); and revoking his supervised release

on a prior conviction for conspiring to defraud the United States,

in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (2000) (No. 03-4157). Finding no

error, we affirm.

Woodberry claims that the district court erred in denying

his various motions to withdraw his guilty plea. Our review of the

plea colloquy discloses that it was conducted in full compliance

with Fed. R. Crim. P. 11. Moreover, Woodberry makes no claim of

actual innocence and raises no additional factors that call into

question the validity of his plea. Accordingly we deny relief on

this claim. See United States v. Moore, 931 F.2d 245, 248 (4th

Cir. 1991).

Woodberry also claims that the district court erred in

denying his motion for recusal and that it became an “advocate for

the plea agreement.” (Appellant’s informal br. at 18). Nothing in

our review of the record of the district court discloses a

reasonable factual basis for doubting the judge’s impartiality.

Consequently, we deny relief on this claim. See In re Beard, 811

F.2d 818, 827 (4th Cir. 1987).
- 4 -

We affirm the judgment of the district court. We also

deny Woodberry’s pending motions for discovery, to correct

transcripts, to supplement the record on appeal with the name of a

confidential informant, for a copy of the Government’s information,

to hold the case in abeyance pending resolution of outstanding

motions, to file a second supplement seeking an audiotape copy of

his sentencing proceeding, and to compel a Government response to

pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
August 8, 2016

Mr. Stephen Gowdy

Gowdy Brothers Aerospace, LLC

Consultant for Ed Beck Photography LLC

8170 Old Carriage Court North

Suite 200

Shakopee, MN 55379

Re: FAA–2015–4669

Dear Mr. Gowdy:

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and 

have determined that we will continue to process your petition. 

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov, we 

are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently-issued regulation, 

Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 107 (www.faa.gov/uas) will satisfy your request. We have determined that 

your request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your 

petition for exemption. 

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will 

publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments, if we have 

not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov. 

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst
Open Literature Review Screen

Chemical Name: Atrazine

CAS No: 1912-24-9

Citation: Lytle, T. F. and J. S. Lytle (2005). "Growth inhibition as indicator ofstress

because of atrazine following multiple toxicant exposure ofthe freshwater macrophyte,

Juncus effusus L." Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 24(5): 1198-1203.

(ECOTOX #081731). (\itt f-l I? L.j <tZ-b 1/ '2-'3)

Date of Screen: 08/21/09

Rationale for Not Conducting a Full Open Literature Review Summary: The study

evaluates the effects of atrazine combined with various mixtures of chlorpyrifos,

monosodium methanearsonate and/or methylmercury. The single atrazine active

ingredient was evaluated; however, endpoints specific for aquatic plants are not provided

for it.

Primary Reviewer: Lisa Muto, Staff Scientist, Cambridge Environmental Inc.

Secondary Reviewer: Teri Myers, Senior Scientist, Cambridge Environmental Inc.

1111.11111

2087848
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 7 (Friday, January 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1450]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-546]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-220-000]


Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

January 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 31, 1996, Williams Natural Gas Company 
(WNG), tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, with the 
proposed effective date of February 1, 1997:

Eighteenth Revised Sheet No. 6A
Third Revised Sheet Nos. 8C and 8D

    WNG states that this filing is being made pursuant to Article 14 of 
the General Terms and Conditions of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised 
Volume No. 1. WNG hereby submits its fourth quarter report of take-or-
pay buyout, buydown and contract reformation costs and gas supply 
related transition costs, and the application or distribution of those 
costs and refunds.
    WNG states that a copy of its filing was served on all participants 
listed on the service lists maintained by the Commission in the dockets 
referenced above and on all of WNG's jurisdictional customers and 
interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-546 Filed 1-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M