alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302


I, Marla Beans, Chief Financial Officer and of Cabinet
Acquisition Corporation, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed the attached report on Form 10-Q.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
     untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
     fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
     circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
     financial information included in this report, fairly present
     in all material respects the financial condition, results of
     operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
     the periods presented in this report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
     controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules)
     for the registrant and have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
     material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within
     those entities, particularly during the period in which this
     report is being prepared;

b)   designed such internal control over financial reporting to
     provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
     financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
     for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
     accounting principles;

c)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
     controls and procedures and presented in this report my
     conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
     controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
     by this report based on such evaluations; and

d)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
     internal control over financial reporting that occurred
     during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
     registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
     annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
     likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting; and

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the
     registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
     board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
     functions):

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
     internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
     ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
     and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material
     weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
     other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
     internal controls.

      Date: November 13, 2009                /s/ Marla Beans
                                          Chief Financial Officer
						and Director
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 22, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 16244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05954]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Document Number NASA-22-013; Docket Number-NASA-2022-0001]


Requirement for NASA Recipients of Financial Assistance Awards To 
Obtain a Quotation From Small and/or Minority Businesses, Women's 
Business Enterprises and Labor Surplus Area Firms

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Request for public comment on new term and condition that 
requires recipients of NASA financial assistance to obtain a quotation 
from small and/or minority businesses, women's business enterprises or 
labor surplus area firms; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 
published a document in the Federal Register of February 23, 2022, 
concerning a request for public comment on new term and condition that 
requires recipients of NASA financial assistance to obtain a quotation 
from small and/or minority businesses, women's business enterprises or 
labor surplus area firms. The document contained an incorrect date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christiane S. Diallo, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f9ba918b908a8d9098979cd79d9098959596b997988a98d79e968f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1b58736972686f727a757e357f727a7777745b757a687a357c746d">[email protected]</span></a>, (202) 358-5179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    In the Federal Register of February 23, 2022, in [FR Doc. 2022-
03602], on page 10257, in the third column, correct the ``Dates'' 
caption to read:
    DATES: Comments must be received by April 24, 2022.

Nanette Smith,
Team Lead, NASA Directives and Regulations.
[FR Doc. 2022-05954 Filed 3-21-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2021338EN.01003101.xml

| 23.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/31

---

Action brought on 7 July 2021 — Confédération nationale du Crédit Mutuel and Others v SRB

(Case T-384/21)

(2021/C 338/40)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Confédération nationale du Crédit Mutuel (Paris, France) and 26 other applicants (represented by: A. Gosset-Grainville, M. Trabucchi and M. Dalon, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, annul Decision SRB/ES/2021/22 of 14 April 2021 on the calculation of the 2021 ex-ante contributions to the SRF in so far as it concerns the applicants; |
| --- | --- |

—

pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, annul Decision SRB/ES/2021/22 of 14 April 2021 on the calculation of the 2021 ex-ante contributions to the SRF in so far as it concerns the applicants;

| — | pursuant to Article 277 TFEU, declare the following provisions of the SRM Regulation, the Implementing Regulation and the Delegated Regulation inapplicable:






  — | Articles 69(1), 69(2), 70(1) and 70(2)(a) and (b) of the SRM Regulation; |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

pursuant to Article 277 TFEU, declare the following provisions of the SRM Regulation, the Implementing Regulation and the Delegated Regulation inapplicable:

—

Articles 69(1), 69(2), 70(1) and 70(2)(a) and (b) of the SRM Regulation;

| — | Article 4(2) and Articles 6 and 7 of the Delegated Regulation, and Annex I thereto; |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 4(2) and Articles 6 and 7 of the Delegated Regulation, and Annex I thereto;

| — | Article 4 of the Implementing Regulation; |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 4 of the Implementing Regulation;

| — | order the defendant to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on eight pleas in law which are, in essence, identical or similar to those put forward in Case T-383/21, Banque postale v SRB.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         466,257
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,939,755
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (93,536)
<INVENTORY>                                    198,533
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,592,447
<PP&E>                                       1,490,265
<DEPRECIATION>                                (663,450)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,788,165
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,380,324
<BONDS>                                      1,895,454
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         70
<COMMON>                                         6,995
<OTHER-SE>                                    (494,678)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,788,165
<SALES>                                      7,844,363
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,844,363
<CGS>                                        6,148,955
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,148,955
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,282,855
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             234,633
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,772,080)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,772,080)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (538,782)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,310,862)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
# C_2021242EN.01005201.xml

| 21.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/52

---

Action brought on 3 May 2021 — Saure v Commission

(Case T-232/21)

(2021/C 242/73)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Hans-Wilhelm Saure (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: C. Partsch, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the Commission’s decision to reject the applicant’s request for access to documents of the Commission (file number Gestdem 2021/0550) by refusing to provide him with copies of all of the correspondence that it has exchanged, since 1 April 2020, with the company AstraZeneca plc or with its subsidiaries as well as with the Federal Chancellery of Germany or with the Federal Ministry of Health, relating to the company AstraZeneca plc or its subsidiaries, and in particular to the quantity of Covid-19 vaccines offered by AstraZeneca plc and its delivery deadlines; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission’s decision to reject the applicant’s request for access to documents of the Commission (file number Gestdem 2021/0550) by refusing to provide him with copies of all of the correspondence that it has exchanged, since 1 April 2020, with the company AstraZeneca plc or with its subsidiaries as well as with the Federal Chancellery of Germany or with the Federal Ministry of Health, relating to the company AstraZeneca plc or its subsidiaries, and in particular to the quantity of Covid-19 vaccines offered by AstraZeneca plc and its delivery deadlines;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law: The applicant has a right to access the contested documents of the European Commission pursuant to Article 2(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001. (1) The refusal by the Commission infringes that provision. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law: The applicant has a right to access the contested documents of the European Commission pursuant to Article 2(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001. (1) The refusal by the Commission infringes that provision.

| 2. | Second plea in law: No ground for exclusion laid down by Regulation No 1049/2001 precludes the applicant’s right of access. The Commission did not put forward any grounds for exclusion and no such grounds are apparent. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law: No ground for exclusion laid down by Regulation No 1049/2001 precludes the applicant’s right of access. The Commission did not put forward any grounds for exclusion and no such grounds are apparent.

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1682

In re: JOSEPH FREEMAN,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. (8:03-cr-00194-DKC-2)

Submitted: August 17, 2023 Decided: August 24, 2023

Before WYNN and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Freeman, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1682 Doc: 9 Filed: 08/24/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Freeman petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has 

unduly delayed acting on his motion for a sentence reduction under the First Step Act. He 

seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district 

court’s docket reveals that the district court granted in part and denied in part the motion 

on August 11, 2023. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided

Freeman’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1682 Doc: 9 Filed: 08/24/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
U.S. Election Assistance Commission Standards Board Annual Meeting

Friday, July 31, 2020

1:30 p.m. – 4:30 p.m. ET

Livestreamed on YouTube

AGENDA

Welcoming Remarks

• Ben Hovland, Chairman, U.S. Election Assistance Commission

• Donald Palmer, Vice-Chairman, U.S. Election Assistance Commission and DFO of the Standards Board

Call to Order

• J. Bradley King, Chairman, EAC Standards Board 

Roll Call; Determination of Quorum

• Stephen Trout, Secretary, EAC Standards Board

Introductory Business

• Approval of Board of Minutes of April 11-12, 2019 Meeting

• Appointment of Election Certification Committee

• Report from the Proxy Committee 

Review of FACA Board Membership Guidelines and Policies 

• Kevin Rayburn, EAC General Counsel 

General EAC Update

• Mona Harrington, EAC Executive Director

Committee Reports on Bylaws Committee Resolution

• Discussion and vote

VVSG 2.0 Requirements Discussion and Vote

• NIST Presentation

• Q&A with Board Members

Updated Postal Service Guidance

• Barbara Goeckner, Standards Board USPS Committee

Executive Board – Election of Officers and Appoints Members to Committees

• Election of New Executive Board Member 

• Election of Executive Board Officers

• Report to Standards Board

• Appointment of New Members to Committees

New Members and Officers Sworn In

Closing Remarks and Adjournment

• J. Bradley King, Chairman, EAC Standards Board
Template for State Requests for Security Funds

Steven M. Frid, Executive Director

U.S. Election Assistance Commission

633 3rd Street, NW, Suite 200

Washington, DC 20001

Dear Mr. Frid:

The purpose of this letter is to request [$ amount] of the State of [Name]’s Help America 

Vote Act (HAVA) Election Security allocation.

The State of [Name] will use the funds provided under the HAVA Election Security grant 

program, for activities consistent with the laws described in Section 906 of HAVA and will 

not use the funds in a manner that is inconsistent with the requirements of Title III of HAVA.

We further certify that we have reviewed and accept the terms of the award as specified in 

the Fiscal Year 2023 Election Security Award Packet and Instructions. The signed terms and 

conditions, program narrative and combined budget have been uploaded to GrantSolutions 

as required.

Our UEI number (formerly DUNS) is [UEI number]. If you have any questions about this 

submission, please contact [Name] at [phone number] or [email].

Sincerely,

[Secretary of State Name]

[Title]

Cc.

Kinza Ghaznavi, Grants Director, HAVAFunding@eac.gov
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**




**Certification
      Pursuant to**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**as
      Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Telestone Technologies Corporation
      (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with
      the
      Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Liu Dongping,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.









By: /s/
      Liu Dongping


Liu
      Dongping


Chief
      Financial Officer


August
      14, 2006
V 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8503 

To authorize the honorary promotion to corporal of Private First Class 

Delbert Littrell, United States Marine Corps. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 1, 2020 

Mr. WALDEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize the honorary promotion to corporal of Private 

First Class Delbert Littrell, United States Marine Corps. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HONORARY PROMOTION TO CORPORAL OF PRI4 VATE FIRST CLASS DELBERT LITTRELL, 

5 UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS (RETIRED). 

6 (a) HONORARY PROMOTION.—Notwithstanding any 

7 time limitation with respect to promotions for persons who 

8 served in the Armed Forces, the President is authorized 

9 to issue an honorary promotion promoting Private First 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8503 IH

1 Class Delbert Littrell, United States Marine Corps (re2 tired), to the rank of corporal. 

3 (b) ADDITIONAL BENEFITS NOT TO ACCRUE.—The 

4 honorary promotion of Delbert Littrell under subsection 

5 (a) shall not affect the retired pay or other benefits from 

6 the United States to which Delbert Littrell is entitled 

7 based upon his military service or affect any benefits to 

8 which any other person may become entitled based on his 

9 military service. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 35.1



Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services,
Inc.



This Annual Statement as to Compliance
is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 13, 2015 (the “Agreement”)
and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2015-1 (the
“Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery
of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection
therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.



The undersigned certifies
that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as
follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to
be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2018 through December
31, 2018, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations
under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any
such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. |                                                                            
|------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                     |                                                                            
|By:                                  | /s/ Connie Coffey                                                          
|                                     | Connie Coffey                                                              
|                                     | Executive Vice President, Corporate
Controller and Chief Accounting
Officer