alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|CERTIFICATION |  | Exhibit 31.1
|------------- |  | ------------



I, C. Harry Knowles, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of
Metrologic Instruments, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors;



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls
over financial reporting.



|Date: September 23, 2003 |  | /s/    C. Harry Knowles
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|                         |
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 Certification of
Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer
of VCA Antech, Inc.
   (i)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
  /s/ Robert L. AntinRobert L. Antin
Chief Executive Officer/s/ Tomas W. FullerTomas W. FullerChief Financial Officer
#### H. L. Burnett v. J. J. Allen.

154 So. 519.

Opinion Filed April 4, 1934.

Petition for Rehearing Denied May 18, 1934.

*Francis B. Winthrop, W. J. Oven*and *James Messer, Jr.,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Guyte P. McCord,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam

— This is a companion case to that of Bond E. Burnett, by H. L. Burnett, his father and next friend, v. J. J. Allen.

*500In that case the victim of the accident sued for damages accruing to him.

In this case the suit is by H. L. Burnett, the father of Bond E. Burnett, for damages sustained by the father by reason of the same acts which are complained of in the other suit.

Therefore, the judgment here should be reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings on authority of the opinion and judgment in the companion case and authorities ■therein cited. It is so ordered.

Reversed and remanded.

■ Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
No. 11-9124.

#### Gobert *v.*Texas.

Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certio-rari denied.
# C_2021329EN.01004401.xml

| 16.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/44

---

Action brought on 6 July 2021 — the airscreen company v EUIPO — Moviescreens Rental (airscreen)

(Case T-382/21)

(2021/C 329/58)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: the airscreen company GmbH & Co. KG (Münster, Germany) (represented by: O. Spieker, A. Schönfleisch and N. Willich)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Moviescreens Rental GmbH (Damme, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU figurative mark airscreen — Application for registration No 16 926 735

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 May 2021 in Case R 1990/2020-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
<PAGE>


                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              WASHINGTON, DC 20549

                       -----------------------------------


                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


       Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): December 3, 2002


                           HANOVER COMPRESSOR COMPANY
               (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

         Delaware                     1-13071                   76-0625124
(State or Other Jurisdiction   (Commission File Number)        (IRS Employer
     of Incorporation)                                      Identification No.)

   12001 North Houston Rosslyn
         Houston, Texas                                            77086
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)                         (Zip Code)

       Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (281) 447-8787

<PAGE>


Item 5. Other Events.

Hanover Compressor Company (NYSE: HC), the leading provider of outsourced
natural gas compression services, today reported it received notification from
the general partner of GKH Investments, L.P., GKH Private Limited, and GKH
Partners, L.P. (collectively "GKH"), of their decision to distribute to the
limited partners and general partners 10,000,000 shares of the 18,274,795 shares
GKH owns of Hanover's common stock. At November 30, 2002, Hanover Compressor had
approximately 80,500,000 shares outstanding.

A copy of the letter sent by GKH to the Company is attached to this report as
Exhibit 99.1.

Item 7. Financial Statements and Exhibits

(a)  Financial Statements of Business Acquired.

     Not  applicable.

(b)  Pro Forma Financial Information.

     Not applicable.

(c)  Exhibits.

     99.1      Letter from GKH Partners, L.P. to Mark S. Berg, Senior Vice
               President and General Counsel of Hanover Compressor Company dated
               December 3, 2002.

<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                HANOVER COMPRESSOR COMPANY

Date:    December 3, 2002       By:    /s/ Mark S. Berg
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                Name:  Mark S. Berg
                                Title: Senior Vice President and General Counsel

<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit Index

Exhibit
Number    Description
------    ----------------------------------------------------------------------

99.1      Letter from GKH Partners, L.P. to Mark S. Berg, Senior Vice President
          and General Counsel of Hanover Compressor Company dated December 3,
          2002.
Exhibit 32.1

Statement of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the
United States Code as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Ketan Mehta, the President
and Chief Executive Officer of Majesco (the “Company”), hereby certifies that based on the undersigned’s knowledge:



| | 1. | The Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2016 (the “Report”) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: October 4, 2016 |  | /s/ Ketan Mehta                                 
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | Ketan MehtaPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Brian Alleman, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Simtek Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.



Date: May 15, 2006

                                              /s/Brian Alleman
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Brian Alleman
                                              Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 1 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 1

   Expressing the sense of the Congress that retirement benefits for 
      Members of Congress should not be subject to cost-of-living 
                              adjustments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 1997

  Mr. Coble submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
 referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, and in 
   addition to the Committee on House Oversight, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of the Congress that retirement benefits for 
      Members of Congress should not be subject to cost-of-living 
                              adjustments.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that retirement benefits should 
not, to the extent that they are based on the service of an individual 
as a Member of Congress, be subject to cost-of-living adjustments.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT  32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report of Air Methods Corporation (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Sec.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.


/s/Aaron D. Todd
----------------------------

Aaron D. Todd
Chief Executive Officer
August 9, 2005


/s/Trent J. Carman
----------------------------

Trent J. Carman
Chief Financial Officer
August 9, 2005


A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Air  Methods  Corporation  and will be retained by Air Methods and
furnished  to  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CHILDREN'S COMPREHENSIVE SERVICES INC FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          12,829
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,189
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,807
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,896
<PP&E>                                          43,159
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,846
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  70,399
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,912
<BONDS>                                         11,634
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            78
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,775
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    70,399
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,813
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,657
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 227
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,303
<INCOME-TAX>                                       898
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,405
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,405
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limit ed circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________ No. 01-40706 (Summary Calendar)

_________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOSE LOPEZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:00-CR-39-3

July 8, 2002 Before JONES, SMITH and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Jose Lopez has requested leave to withdraw as counsel and has
filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Lopez has not filed a

response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.-2-

Accordingl

y, co unsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, and counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ALFREDO MENDOZA-ALVAREZ,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-30186

D.C. No. 2:10-cr-02140-FVS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Fred L. Van Sickle, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 24, 2013** 

Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. 

Alfredo Mendoza-Alvarez appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 27-month term of supervised release imposed upon revocation of

supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Mendoza-Alvarez contends that the district court procedurally erred by

FILED

OCT 03 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-30186

failing to consider and explain why a new term of supervised release was

warranted in light of U.S.S.G. § 5D1.1(c) (2011), which directs that a district court

ordinarily should not impose a term of supervised release if the defendant is a

deportable alien. The record reflects that the district court considered section

5D1.1(c) and adequately explained why it declined to follow it. Contrary to

Mendoza-Alvarez’s contention, no written statement of reasons was required

because the district court imposed a term of supervised release within the

Guidelines range. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c)(2); U.S.S.G. § 7B1.3(g)(2); United

States v. Valdavinos-Torres, 704 F.3d 679, 693 (9th Cir. 2012) (“no departure

analysis is triggered” by the imposition of supervised release because section

5D1.1(c) is not mandatory).

Mendoza-Alvarez also challenges the term of supervised release as

substantively unreasonable. The district court did not abuse its discretion in

imposing a 27-month term of supervised release. See Valdavinos-Torres, 704 F.3d

at 692. The sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including

Mendoza-Alvarez’s numerous prior deportations. See id. at 692-93; see also

U.S.S.G. § 5D1.1(c) cmt. n.5 (district court should consider imposing term of

supervised release on deportable alien if it determines supervised release would
3 12-30186

provide an added measure of deterrence and protection).

AFFIRMED.