alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7031
In Re: LINWOOD DOUGLAS THORNE, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-94-453-HNM) Submitted: September 9, 1999 Decided: September 15, 1999 Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Linwood Douglas Thorne, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Linwood Douglas Thorne has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus from this court seeking an order instructing the Respondent to provide him with a copy of the transcript of the grand jury proceeding that lead to Thorne’s indictment. Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). Mandamus relief is only available when there are no other means by which the relief sought could be granted, see In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987), and may not be used as a substitute for appeal. See In re Catawba Indian Tribe of S. Carolina , 973 F.2d 1133, 1135 (4th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, although we grant Thorne’s motion toproceed in forma pauperis, we deny mandamus relief. Thorne’s motion to expedite this petition is now moot and is denied for that reason. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8263 

To ensure opportunities for Department of Defense participation in wildlife 

conservation banking programs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2020 

Mr. WITTMAN (for himself and Ms. HAALAND) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To ensure opportunities for Department of Defense participation in wildlife conservation banking programs, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OBJECTIVES, PERFORMANCE STANDARDS, AND 

4 CRITERIA FOR USE OF WILDLIFE CONSERVA5 TION BANKING PROGRAMS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—To ensure opportunities for De7 partment of Defense participation in wildlife conservation 

8 banking programs pursuant to section 2694c of title 10, 

9 United States Code, the Secretary of the Interior, acting 

10 through the Director of the United States Fish and WildVerDate Sep 11 2014 18:43 Sep 25, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H8263.IH H8263

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8263 IH

1 life Service, shall issue regulations of general applicability 

2 establishing objectives, measurable performance stand3 ards, and criteria for use, consistent with the Endangered 

4 Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), for mitigation bank5 ing offsetting effects on a species, or habitat of such spe6 cies, that is endangered, threatened, a candidate for list7 ing, or otherwise at risk under such Act. To the maximum 

8 extent practicable, the regulatory standards and criteria 

9 shall maximize available credits and opportunities for miti10 gation, provide flexibility for characteristics of various spe11 cies, and apply equivalent standards and criteria to all 

12 mitigation banks. 

13 (b) DEADLINE FOR REGULATIONS.—The Secretary 

14 of the Interior, acting through the Director of the United 

15 States Fish and Wildlife Service, shall publish an advance 

16 notice of proposed rulemaking for the regulations required 

17 by subsection (a) by not later than one year after the date 

18 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       1,496,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,737,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   153,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,293,000
<PP&E>                                      19,066,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,614,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,186,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,600,000
<BONDS>                                      6,107,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       108,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,881,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,186,000
<SALES>                                     16,671,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,411,000
<CGS>                                       14,039,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,039,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               850,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                29,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             670,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,823,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   292,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,531,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 54,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,477,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
        

</TABLE>
#### GOLD, D. v. PLESSET PROPERTIES

1178 WDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/18/2017

GD 12-018098

(Allegheny)

Affirmed
No. 11-10393.

#### Freerksen *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-9023.

#### Saghir *v.*Grievance Committee for the 2d, 11th, and 13th Judicial Districts.

App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y. 2d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT
32
   CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
  AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Air Methods Corporation (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
   /s/ Aaron D. Todd
 Aaron D.
Todd
 Chief
Executive Officer
 November
7, 2008
 
  /s/ Trent J. Carman
 Trent J.
Carman
 Chief
Financial Officer
 November
7, 2008
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed February 22, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D23-0096 Lower Tribunal No. F97-34245C

________________ 

### Carlton Bannister, Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lody Jean, Judge. Carlton Bannister, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before LOGUE, GORDO and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Bannister v. State, 990 So. 2d 595 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).
Ms. Temple J. Ferrell, serves at the Acting Director of Acquisition, 

Contracts, and Logistics (AL) and the component acquisition executive 

(CAE) for the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA). In her current role, 

she establishes and implements policy and procedures; ensures adherence 

with applicable laws and regulations; and monitors compliance in the areas 

of acquisition, contracts, logistics, engineering, and facilities. As the CAE, 

Ms. Ferrell guides annual acquisition strategies for the entire acquisition 

portfolio valued at over $1 billion.

Ms. Ferrell served as the AL Deputy Director prior to assuming the Acting 

Director position. Prior to being selected as the AL Deputy Director, Ms. 

Ferrell led the Nuclear Enterprise and Information Technology Contracts 

Division where she was responsible for enabling her customers’ missions 

through obligating over $202M via 279 contracting actions in 2022. Prior to 

transitioning back to DTRA’s AL-AC Department, Ms. Ferrell served in 

Afghanistan as the Director, Resource Management, Ministry of Finance and International 

Engagements, Combined Security Transition Command-Afghanistan (CSTC-A), Resolute Support 

Mission, Kabul Afghanistan. She led a 14-member team of US Military, US Government, contractor 

and coalition members. Ms. Ferrell was the senior CSTC-A representative to the international 

diplomatic community on the Law and Order Trust Fund and the NATO Afghan National Army Trust 

Fund. She was sent to NATO to represent CSTC-A during pivotal meetings between US Mission to 

NATO, NATO International Support, and the OSD. 

Ms. Ferrell began her civilian Government career in 2002 after serving 12 years active duty in the US 

Army and retired from the US Air Force Reserves in 2009. She entered the Contracting career through 

DLA Energy’s intern program. Her career progressed through various challenging assignments to 

include HQ DLA, US Marine Corps Systems Command, United States Forces Afghanistan and 

supporting multiple DTRA Directorates throughout the past 17 years. 

Ms. Ferrell holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Management from National-Louis 

University, and a Masters of Business Administration-Leadership from Liberty University. She is a 

certified Contracting Professional and a Program Management Practitioner.

BIOGRAPHY

Ms. Temple J. Ferrell

Acting Director, Acquisition, Contracts and Logistics 

UNCLASSIFIED

Distribution Statement A - Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited
(logo)BERKADIA ®

 

 

Annual Statement asto Compliance

For the Year EndedDecember 31, 2019 (the “Reporting Period”)

 

*Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation,*

*Series 2015-DC1*

 

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 of the Pooling andServicing Agreement governing the referenced transaction (the “ServicingAgreement”), I hereby attest that:

 

i. A review of theactivities and performance of Berkadia as Subservicer during the ReportingPeriod has been made under my supervision.

 

 ii. To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, Berkadia as Subservicer hasfulfilled, in all material respects, its obligations under this SubservicingAgreement throughout the Reporting Period and no default by the Subservicerunder the Subservicing Agreement has occurred and is continuing.

 

 

Berkadia, 

 

 

/s/Mark E McCool

MarkE. McCool

President

February10, 2020
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ZERO MOTORCYCLES, INC.,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

PIRELLI TYRE S.P.A.; PIRELLI & C.

S.P.A.,

 Defendants - Appellees,

 and

PIRELLI NORTH AMERICA, INC.;

PIRELLI TIRE LLC,

 Defendants.

No. 11-16984

D.C. No. 4:10-cv-01290-SBA

MEMORANDUM*

ZERO MOTORCYCLES, INC.,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

PIRELLI TYRE S.P.A.; PIRELLI & C.

S.P.A.; PIRELLI NORTH AMERICA,

INC.; PIRELLI TIRE LLC,

No. 12-16187

D.C. No. 4:10-cv-01290-SBA

FILED

APR 26 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Saundra B. Armstrong, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 19, 2013

San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER, SILVERMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Zero Motorcycles (“Zero”) appeals the district court’s

order dismissing its action against Pirelli & C.S.p.A. and Pirelli Tyre S.p.A.

(collectively, “Pirelli-Defendants”) for lack of personal jurisdiction. We reverse,

because the district court erred in concluding that it lacked specific jurisdiction

over the Pirelli-Defendants. The district court held that the trademark proceedings

the Pirelli-Defendants instituted before the United States Patent and Trademark

Office (“USPTO”) were not “purposefully directed” at California. The PirelliDefendants, however, knew that Zero’s principal place of business was in

California. See Washington Shoe Co. v. A–Z Sporting Goods Inc., 704 F.3d 668,

679 (9th Cir. 2012); Bancroft & Masters, Inc. v. Augusta Nat’l Inc., 223 F.3d 1082,

1087 (9th Cir. 2000). Any harm that Zero suffered from the allegedly improper

USPTO proceedings would therefore be felt by Zero in California. See

CollegeSource, Inc. v. AcademyOne Inc., 653 F.3d 1066, 1079 (9th Cir. 2011)
3

(“We have repeatedly held that a corporation incurs economic loss, for

jurisdictional purposes, in the forum of its principal place of business.”). Because

the Pirelli-Defendants should reasonably expect that any harm from the USPTO

proceedings would occur in California, they can “reasonably anticipate being haled

into court” in California. World–Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S.

286, 297 (1980).

We accordingly dismiss as moot Zero’s appeal of the district court’s order

denying Zero’s motion for relief from judgment under Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 60, and we do not consider Zero’s request for leave to amend its

complaint to assert additional facts regarding jurisdiction. 

REVERSED and REMANDED.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8547 

To make permanent the tax deduction for energy efficient commercial 

buildings. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 6, 2020 

Mr. WILLIAMS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To make permanent the tax deduction for energy efficient 

commercial buildings. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Incentivize Energy5 Saving Improvements Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TAX DEDUCTION FOR ENERGY EFFICIENT COMMER7 CIAL BUILDINGS MADE PERMANENT. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 179D of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986 is amended by striking subsection (h). 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8547 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2020. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             886
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,602
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,157
<INVENTORY>                                        204
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,442
<PP&E>                                           6,029
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,305
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,431
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        28,059
<OTHER-SE>                                    (42,752)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,133
<SALES>                                          2,968
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,968
<CGS>                                            1,295
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,458
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,867
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 286
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,587)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         7
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,594)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,594)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.77)


</TABLE>
# C_2021278EN.01006801.xml

| 12.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/68

---

Action brought on 24 May 2021 — Joules v EUIPO — Star Gold (Jules Gents)

(Case T-294/21)

(2021/C 278/92)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Joules Ltd (Market Harborough, United Kingdom) (represented by: P. Martini-Berthon, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Star Gold GmbH (Pforzheim, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark Jules Gents — Application for registration No 15 719 305

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 March 2021 in Case R 1123/2018-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in its entirety;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant, including the costs of proceedings before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant, including the costs of proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 71(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 71(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights;

| — | Infringement of Articles 71(1) and 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Article 27(2) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 and Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 71(1) and 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Article 27(2) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 and Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
 ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended
          December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christen E.J. Lee, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
          pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
                The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
                The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 By:
            /s/ Christen E.J. LeeChristen E.J. LeeCo-President and Co-Chief Executive Officer(Co-Principal Executive Officer) 
 February 21, 2019
 
 * The foregoing certification is
          being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
# Úřední věstník C 168/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0863 |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | C 168 |
| | |
| České vydání | Informace a oznámení | Ročník 6115. května 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0863

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

C 168

České vydání

Informace a oznámení

Ročník 6115. května 2018

---

| Oznámeníč. | Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Oznámení |
| | SPRÁVNÍ ŘÍZENÍ |
| 2018/C 168/01 | Výzva k předkládání žádostí v rámci iniciativy WiFi4EU (podpora připojení k internetu v místních komunitách) v oblasti transevropských telekomunikačních sítí v rámci Nástroje pro propojení Evropy (Pozměněný pracovní program pro CEF Telecom pro rok 2017 – prováděcí rozhodnutí Komise C(2017) 7732) | 1 |

Oznámeníč.

Obsah

Strana

V   Oznámení

SPRÁVNÍ ŘÍZENÍ

2018/C 168/01

Výzva k předkládání žádostí v rámci iniciativy WiFi4EU (podpora připojení k internetu v místních komunitách) v oblasti transevropských telekomunikačních sítí v rámci Nástroje pro propojení Evropy (Pozměněný pracovní program pro CEF Telecom pro rok 2017 – prováděcí rozhodnutí Komise C(2017) 7732)

1

---

| CS | |
| --- | --- |

CS

---

V Oznámení

SPRÁVNÍ ŘÍZENÍ

| 15.5.2018 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | C 168/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2018

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

C 168/1

---

Výzva k předkládání žádostí v rámci iniciativy WiFi4EU (podpora připojení k internetu v místních komunitách) v oblasti transevropských telekomunikačních sítí v rámci Nástroje pro propojení Evropy

(Pozměněný pracovní program pro CEF Telecom pro rok 2017 – prováděcí rozhodnutí Komise C(2017) 7732)

(2018/C 168/01)

Evropská komise, Generální ředitelství pro komunikační sítě, obsah a technologie, zveřejňuje tuto výzvu k předkládání žádostí v rámci iniciativy WiFi4EU za účelem poskytnutí grantů na projekty v souladu s prioritami a cíli definovanými v pozměněném pracovním programu pro rok 2017 v oblasti transevropských telekomunikačních sítí v rámci Nástroje pro propojení Evropy.

Přijímají se žádosti pro první výzvu (WIFI4EU-2017-1) týkající se podpory připojení k internetu v místních komunitách.

Na žádosti vybrané v rámci této výzvy je orientačně vyčleněno celkem 17 745 000 EUR.

Datum uzávěrky pro předkládání žádostí je 15. června 2018.

Žádosti v rámci této výzvy musí být předkládány prostřednictvím portálu WiFi4EU: https://www.wifi4eu.eu/

Dokumentace k příslušné výzvě je k dispozici na internetových stránkách agentury INEA: https://ec.europa.eu/inea/en/connecting-europe-facility/cef-telecom/wifi4eu

---