alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FAA FORM 7711-1 UAS COA Attachment

2013-ESA-90-COA

Version 2.1: June 2012

Page 1 of 22

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

CERTIFICATE OF WAIVER OR AUTHORIZATION

ISSUED TO

Middle Georgia State College

Middle Georgia State College 

71 Airport Road

Eastman, GA 31023

This certificate is issued for the operations specifically described hereinafter. No person shall conduct any operation 

pursuant to the authority of this certificate except in accordance with the standard and special provisions contained 

in this certificate, and such other requirements of the Federal Aviation Regulations not specifically waived by this 

certificate.

OPERATIONS AUTHORIZED

Operation of the Hawk-I, Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) in Class G and E airspace in the user 

defined area depicted in Attachment 1 under the jurisdiction of Heart of Georgia (Eastman) Airport 

Traffic Control Tower (EZM ATCT). See Attachment 1.

LIST OF WAIVED REGULATIONS BY SECTION AND TITLE

N/A

STANDARD PROVISIONS

1. A copy of the application made for this certificate shall be attached and become a part hereof.

2. This certificate shall be presented for inspection upon the request of any authorized representative of the Federal 

Aviation Administration, or of any State or municipal official charged with the duty of enforcing local laws or 

regulations.

3. The holder of this certificate shall be responsible for the strict observance of the terms and provisions contained 

herein.

4. This certificate is nontransferable.

Note-This certificate constitutes a waiver of those Federal rules or regulations specifically referred to above. It does 

not constitute a waiver of any State law or local ordinance.

SPECIAL PROVISIONS

Special Provisions are set forth and attached.

The certificate 2013-ESA-90 is effective from February 26, 2014 to February 25, 2016 and is 

subject to cancellation at any time upon notice by the Administrator or his/her authorized 

representative.

BY DIRECTION OF THE ADMINISTRATOR

 

 FAA Headquarters, AJV-115 David Haddad (Region) (Signature)

February 26, 2014 Air Traffic Manager, UAS Tactical Operations Section (Date) (Title)
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has deter mined that this

opinion s h ould not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________

No. 95-41028

(Summary Calendar)

_________________

JOHN M BUSHMAN, not individually but as

Trustee for the C & J Revocable Trust,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CITY OF CORINTH,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Texas

(4:94-CV-191)

August 30, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

John M. Bushman, as Trustee for the C & J Revocable Trust,

appeals the district court’s order of summary judgment upholding

the constitutionality of a zoning ordinance enacted by the City of

Corinth. After an independent review of the record, we can find no-2-

genuine issue of material fact. The City’s refusal to grant

appellant a special use p ermit was rationally related to its

legitimate interest in preventin g the open display of goods and

merchandise and the noise and movement of large trucks needed to

transport mobile homes in and out of the area. S ee City of

Cleburne, Tex. v. Cleburne Living Ctr., 473 U.S. 432, 105 S. Ct.

3249, 87 L. Ed. 2d 313 (1985); Howard v. City of Garland, 917 F.2d

898 (5th Cir. 1990). Accordingly, the City was entitled to

judgment as a matter of law. Because appellant is not a prevailing

party under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the district court did not err by

failing to award him attorneys’ fees.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court

is AFFIRMED.
No. 11-1357.

#### Sharp *v.*Johnson et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
exh_1011.htm


Exhibit 10.11


 


 



	
Onvia, Inc.


Management Incentive Plan


	
Participants

	
Officers of Onvia, Inc.


	
Objectives

	
· Achieve corporate performance that most reflect stockholder interests


· Drive and reward unified performance across executive team


· Focus on building trend for long-term, profitable growth


	
Key Achievement Metrics

	
Achievement of Board defined goals including without limitation Bookings, Net Income, EBITDA and cash flow.


	
Bonus Target

	
Between 22% - 80% of Base Salary for Participants


	
Overachievement

	
If the Company’s performance against the Key Achievement Metrics exceeds the target goals established by the Board, the Board has established accelerators to modify the Participants’ award levels.


	
Terms of Funding and Payment

	
· If the Company’s performance against the Key Achievement Metrics falls below the floor goals established by the Board, the bonus pool shall not be funded.


· If the Company’s performance meets the floor goals established by the Board, 25% of bonus targets shall be paid.


· If the Company’s performance falls between floor and target goals, bonus targets shall be prorated.


· Bonus pool to be funded and bonus targets paid upon certification by the Compensation Committee of metrics achieved by the Company.


	
Supplemental Bonus Plan

	
A supplemental bonus will be paid to certain Participants if 50% of Key Achievement Metrics are achieved by the first half of the plan year.
# C_2021462EN.01004801.xml

| 15.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/48

---

Action brought on 9 September 2021 — Worldwide Brands v EUIPO — Guangdong Camel Apparel (CAMEL CROWN)

(Case T-562/21)

(2021/C 462/57)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Worldwide Brands, Inc. Zweigniederlassung Deutschland (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: J. Gracia Albero and R. Ahijón Lana, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Guangdong Camel Apparel Co. Ltd (Foshan City, China)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European word mark CAMEL CROWN — Application for registration No 17 882 201

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 June 2021 in Joined Cases R 159/2020-5 and R 184/2020-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | partially annul the contested decision to the extent that it partially upheld the appeal filed by the intervener and partially rejected the appeal filed by this party, allowing the registration of the contested trademark for the indicated goods in classes 24 and 28; |
| --- | --- |

—

partially annul the contested decision to the extent that it partially upheld the appeal filed by the intervener and partially rejected the appeal filed by this party, allowing the registration of the contested trademark for the indicated goods in classes 24 and 28;

| — | order the defendant to bear the costs of the present proceedings, including the costs deriving from the proceedings before the Opposition Division and the Fifth Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to bear the costs of the present proceedings, including the costs deriving from the proceedings before the Opposition Division and the Fifth Board of Appeal.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

December 6, 2011

Honorable Michael Krancer, Secretary

Department of Environmental Protection

Rachel Carson State Office Building

P.O. Box 2063

Harrisburg, PA 17105-2063

Dear Secretary Krancer:

On July 21, 2011, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to 

the Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Department of Environmental 

Protection (PADEP) pertaining to a 2011 Carbon Monoxide (CO) Limited Maintenance Plan for 

the Central Business District of Allegheny County. This revision is requesting the approval of a 

limited maintenance plan for a second ten-year period through year 2022 for the CO national 

ambient air quality standards. EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and 

technically complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. 

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Mr. Gregory Becoat, 

at (215) 814-2036, the principal contact for this rulemaking. 

Sincerely,

 /s/

 Diana Esher, Director

 Air Protection Division 

cc: Ms. Joyce Epps, PADEP

 Ms. Arlene Shulman, PADEP

 Mr. James Thompson, ACHD
Exhibit 4.3





 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated March 26, 2014, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-193740) of Smart Trust, Tax
Free Income Trust, Series 16.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


Grant
Thornton LLP


Chicago, Illinois


March 26, 2014
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8520 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8520

To direct the Secretary of the Treasury to issue or revise regulations 
or guidance to clarify that the educator expense tax deduction includes 
 expenses for personal protective equipment and other supplies related 
              to the prevention of the spread of COVID-19.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 2, 2020

 Mrs. Murphy of Florida (for herself and Mrs. Walorski) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of the Treasury to issue or revise regulations 
or guidance to clarify that the educator expense tax deduction includes 
 expenses for personal protective equipment and other supplies related 
              to the prevention of the spread of COVID-19.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Supporting Educators During COVID-19 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REGULATIONS OR GUIDANCE CLARIFYING APPLICATION OF EDUCATOR 
              EXPENSE TAX DEDUCTION.

    Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of the Treasury (or the Secretary's delegate) shall by 
regulation or other guidance clarify that personal protective 
equipment, disinfectant, and other supplies used for the prevention of 
the spread of COVID-19 are included in the educator expense tax 
deduction described in section 62(a)(2)(D) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-9622.

#### Meece *v.*Kentucky.

Sup. Ct. Ky. Certiorari denied.
#### Frederick BANKS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Kelly FORBES, FMC Butner; U.S. Marshal’s Service; Mark Hornak; D. Drew, Warden, USP Atlanta; J.C. Holland, Warden, FMC Butner; S.A. Sean Langford; Christopher Asher Wray; Mike Pompeo, Central Intelligence Agency; Robert Cessar, Asst. US Attorney; Soo Song, US Attorney; Federal Bureau of Prisons; Thomas Kane, Acting Director, Federal BOP, Respondents-Appellees.

*772No. 17-7207

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 21, 2017

Decided: December 28, 2017

Frederick Hamilton Banks, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Federal pretrial detainee Frederick Banks appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012), and a writ of mandamus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1861 (2012). We agree with the district court that, because a Pennsylvania District Court is in the process of determining Banks’ competency to stand trial, Banks’ request for mandamus and habeas relief is premature. *See Heckler v. Ringer,*466 U.S. 602, 616, 104 S.Ct. 2013, 80 L.Ed.2d 622 (1984) (“The common-law writ of mandamus, as codified in 28 U.S.C. § 1361, is intended to provide a remedy for a plaintiff only if he has exhausted all other avenues of relief and only if the defendant owes him a clear nondiscretionary duty.”); *Timms v. Johns,*627 F.3d 525, 530 (4th Cir. 2010) (“[W]e hold that Timms should have exhausted his alternative remedies in the Commitment Action before availing himself of habeas review under § *2241.”).*Thus, we grant Bank’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the district court’s judgment. *See Banks v. Forbes,*No. 5:17-hc-02102-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 28, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial  information  extracted from Basic
     Natural  Resources,  Inc.  March  30,  1996  financial  statements  and  is
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000817125
<NAME>                        Basic Natural Resource, Inc.

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1996

<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          41,209
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    174,865
<COMMON>                                       119
<OTHER-SE>                                     (216,193)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               69,403
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             81
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (69,481)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,299)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (66,182)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (66,182)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.03)
        



</TABLE>
Order entered March 2 4 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 13 - 00 834 - CR No. 05 - 13 - 00 8 36 - CR GREGORY MARTINEZ , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County , Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F1 2 - 60606 - J , F1 2 - 60605 - J



### O RDER The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendation s and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeals, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeals. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may b e necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of t he date of this order. The appeals are ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeals shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier. /s/ LANA MYERS JUSTI CE
#### Natividad RAMOS-MARROQUIN, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 16-71341

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed December 20, 2017

Garrett James Wilkes, Trial Attorney, Garrett Wilkes Law, PLLC, Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioner

Drew Brinkman, Suzanne N. Nardone, Esquire, OIL, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Natividad Ramos-Marroquin, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ or*901der dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her motion for a continuance. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a continuance and review de novo questions of law. *Ahmed v. Holder,*569 F.3d 1009, 1012 (9th Cir. 2009). We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying for lack of good cause Ramos-Marroquin’s motion for a further continuance, where Ramos-Marroquin was not eligible to adjust her status, and post-conviction relief remained a speculative possibility at the time of her final hearing. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.29; *Ahmed,*569 F.3d at 1012 (outlining factors for the reviewing court to consider when reviewing the agency’s denial of a continuance); *Singh v. Holder,*638 F.3d 1264, 1274 (9th Cir. 2011) (“[T]he IJ [is] not required to grant a continuance based on ... speculations.”); cf. *Malilia v. Holder,*632 F.3d 598, 606 (9th Cir. 2011) (listing factors the agency should consider in determining whether to continue proceedings for adjudication of a pending visa petition).

The record does not support Ramos-Marroquin’s contention that the agency failed to apply the correct standard or consider relevant factors in denying the continuance.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - [RTID 0648-XB915]

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice; public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's (Council) Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish Advisory Panel will hold a public webinar meeting.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Tuesday, April 26, 2022, from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The meeting will be held via webinar. Connection information will be posted to                         *https://www.mafmc.org/​council-events.*

*Council address:*                         Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331;                         *www.mafmc.org.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council; telephone: (302) 526-5255.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Council's Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish Advisory Panel will meet via webinar to discuss recent performance of the butterfish, longfin squid, and Atlantic chub mackerel fisheries and develop Fishery Performance Reports. These reports will be considered by the Scientific and Statistical Committee, the Monitoring Committee, and the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council when reviewing or setting catch and landings limits and management measures for upcoming years.

## Special Accommodations

The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aid should be directed to Shelley Spedden, (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

*Authority:*16 U.S.C. 1801*et seq.*

Dated: April 4, 2022.

Tracey L. Thompson,

Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 2022-07381 Filed 4-6-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-P