19536 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 64 / Monday, April 4, 2022 / Notices 

1See Docket No. RM2018–3, Order Adopting 

Final Rules Relating to Non-Public Information, 

June 27, 2018, Attachment A at 19–22 (Order No. 

4679). 

Agreement States licensees and 

registration certificate holders). 

9. The estimated number of hours 

needed annually to comply with the 

information collection requirement or 

request: 109,510 (15,601 reporting + 

1,122 recordkeeping + 92,787 thirdparty). 

10. Abstract: 10 CFR part 32, 

establishes requirements for specific 

licenses for the introduction of 

byproduct material into products or 

materials and transfer of the products or 

materials to general licensees, or 

persons exempt from licensing, medical 

use product distributors to specific 

licensees, and those requesting a 

certificate of registration for a sealed 

source and/or device. It also prescribes 

requirements governing holders of the 

specific licenses. Some of the 

requirements are for information which 

must be submitted in an application for 

a certificate of registration for a sealed 

source and/or device, records which 

must be kept, reports which must be 

submitted, and information which must 

be forwarded to general licensees and 

persons exempt from licensing. As 

mentioned, 10 CFR part 32 also 

prescribes requirements for the issuance 

of certificates of registration (concerning 

radiation safety information about a 

product) to manufacturers or initial 

transferors of sealed sources and 

devices. Submission or retention of the 

information is mandatory for persons 

subject to the 10 CFR part 32 

requirements. The information is used 

by the NRC to make licensing and other 

regulatory determinations concerning 

the use of radioactive byproduct 

material in products and devices. 

III. Specific Requests for Comments 

The NRC is seeking comments that 

address the following questions: 

1. Is the proposed collection of 

information necessary for the NRC to 

properly perform its functions? Does the 

information have practical utility? 

2. Is the estimate of the burden of the 

information collection accurate? 

3. Is there a way to enhance the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected? 

4. How can the burden of the 

information collection on respondents 

be minimized, including the use of 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology? 

Dated: March 29, 2022. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

David C. Cullison, 

NRC Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2022–06956 Filed 4–1–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION 

[Docket Nos. MC2022–49 and CP2022–54] 

New Postal Products 

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing 

recent Postal Service filings for the 

Commission’s consideration concerning 

a negotiated service agreement. This 

notice informs the public of the filings, 

invites public comment, and takes other 

administrative steps. 

DATES: Comments are due: April 6, 

2022. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments 

electronically via the Commission’s 

Filing Online system at http://

www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit 

comments electronically should contact 

the person identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section by 

telephone for advice on filing 

alternatives. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 

202–789–6820. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Introduction 

II. Docketed Proceeding(s) 

I. Introduction 

The Commission gives notice that the 

Postal Service filed request(s) for the 

Commission to consider matters related 

to negotiated service agreement(s). The 

request(s) may propose the addition or 

removal of a negotiated service 

agreement from the market dominant or 

the competitive product list, or the 

modification of an existing product 

currently appearing on the market 

dominant or the competitive product 

list. 

Section II identifies the docket 

number(s) associated with each Postal 

Service request, the title of each Postal 

Service request, the request’s acceptance 

date, and the authority cited by the 

Postal Service for each request. For each 

request, the Commission appoints an 

officer of the Commission to represent 

the interests of the general public in the 

proceeding, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505 

(Public Representative). Section II also 

establishes comment deadline(s) 

pertaining to each request. 

The public portions of the Postal 

Service’s request(s) can be accessed via 

the Commission’s website (http://

www.prc.gov). Non-public portions of 

the Postal Service’s request(s), if any, 

can be accessed through compliance 

with the requirements of 39 CFR 

3011.301.1

The Commission invites comments on 

whether the Postal Service’s request(s) 

in the captioned docket(s) are consistent 

with the policies of title 39. For 

request(s) that the Postal Service states 

concern market dominant product(s), 

applicable statutory and regulatory 

requirements include 39 U.S.C. 3622, 39 

U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3030, and 39 

CFR part 3040, subpart B. For request(s) 

that the Postal Service states concern 

competitive product(s), applicable 

statutory and regulatory requirements 

include 39 U.S.C. 3632, 39 U.S.C. 3633, 

39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3035, and 

39 CFR part 3040, subpart B. Comment 

deadline(s) for each request appear in 

section II. 

II. Docketed Proceeding(s) 

1. Docket No(s).: MC2022–49 and 

CP2022–54; Filing Title: USPS Request 

to Add Priority Mail Contract 738 to 

Competitive Product List and Notice of 

Filing Materials Under Seal; Filing 

Acceptance Date: March 29, 2022; Filing 

Authority: 39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR 

3040.130 through 3040.135, and 39 CFR 

3035.105; Public Representative: 

Kenneth R. Moeller; Comments Due: 

April 6, 2022. 

This Notice will be published in the 

Federal Register. 

Erica A. Barker, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2022–07039 Filed 4–1–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P 

PRIVACY AND CIVIL LIBERTIES 

OVERSIGHT BOARD 

[Notice–PCLOB–2022–01; Docket No. 2022– 

0009; Sequence No. 1] 

Notice of Public Forum 

AGENCY: Privacy and Civil Liberties 

Oversight Board (PCLOB). 

ACTION: Request for public comments 

and notice of public forum on domestic 

terrorism. 

SUMMARY: The PCLOB or Board seeks 

public comments regarding, and will 

hold a public forum to consider, privacy 

and civil liberties issues concerning the 

government’s efforts to counter 

domestic terrorism. The PCLOB seeks 

public comments regarding the 

following topics (described in more 

detail below): Implications for First 

Amendment-Protected Activities; 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 64 / Monday, April 4, 2022 / Notices 19537 

Implications for Privacy and Fourth 

Amendment rights; Federal and State/ 

Local/Tribal/Territorial (SLTT) 

Government Cooperation in Countering 

Domestic Terrorism; Use of Technology 

in Efforts to Combat Domestic 

Terrorism; Differential Impacts on 

Racial and Other Minority Groups; and 

any Other Privacy or Civil Liberties 

Implications Related to Domestic 

Terrorism. Additionally, the PCLOB 

will hold a virtual public forum to 

examine privacy and civil liberties 

issues regarding the government’s 

efforts to counter domestic terrorism. 

During the forum, Board Members will 

hear a range of expert views. 

DATES: The PCLOB plans to hold the 

public forum in late May or early June 

2022. The exact date will be announced 

on www.pclob.gov by no later than 

Monday, April 25, 2022. PCLOB will 

consider all public comments received 

by Thursday, June 30, 2022. 

The comment period will remain 

open beyond the public forum date to 

enable individuals to submit comments 

that reflect the presentations and 

discussion during the forum. However, 

commenters who seek to inform the 

final agenda for the Board’s forthcoming 

virtual public forum, are requested to 

please submit comments on or before 

Monday, April 25, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: The public forum will be 

held virtually. Instructions for how to 

attend the virtual forum will be posted 

to www.pclob.gov. The Board invites 

written comments regarding privacy and 

civil liberties in the domestic terrorism 

context. You may submit comments 

responsive to notice PCLOB–2022–01 

via http://www.regulations.gov. Please 

search by Notice PCLOB–2022–01 and 

follow the on-line instructions for 

submitting comments. Responsive 

comments received generally will be 

posted without change to 

regulations.gov, including any personal 

and/or business confidential 

information provided. To confirm 

receipt of your comment(s), please 

check regulations.gov approximately 

two-to-three business days after 

submission to verify posting. 

Comments may be submitted any time 

prior to the closing of the docket at 

11:59 p.m., EDT, on Thursday, June 30, 

2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mason Clutter, Acting Executive 

Director at 202–296–4649; pao@

pclob.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Procedures for Public Observation 

The event is open to the public. Preregistration is required. Registration 

instructions will be posted to 

www.pclob.gov. Individuals who plan to 

participate virtually and require special 

assistance should contact pao@

pclob.gov at least 72 hours prior to the 

event. The Board welcomes comments 

on privacy and civil liberties issues 

related to any of the following topics, 

including potential recommendations 

for policy reforms: 

Government Actions Against Domestic 

Terrorism: Authorities, Procedures, 

Safeguards, and Impacts on First 

Amendment-Protected Activities 

Responsive comments should 

examine the authorities, procedures, 

and safeguards governing federal 

government action countering domestic 

terrorism when such action could affect 

protected First Amendment activity. 

Responsive comments may also address 

the effects of such government action on 

First Amendment activity, and what 

further safeguards, mitigations, or 

oversight may be needed. Examples 

include social media and internet 

surveillance, as well as surveillance of 

those exercising their rights of free 

expression and assembly. 

Government Surveillance To Combat 

Domestic Terrorism: Authorities, 

Procedures, Safeguards, and Impacts 

on Privacy and Fourth Amendment 

Rights 

Responsive comments should address 

the use of surveillance to combat 

domestic terrorism, including the 

authorities, procedures and safeguards 

that currently govern such surveillance, 

and the applicability of the Fourth 

Amendment and other legal protections 

for privacy. Responsive comments may 

also address what further safeguards, 

mitigations, or oversight may be needed 

to protect privacy. 

Federal and State/Local/Tribal/ 

Territorial (SLTT) Government 

Cooperation in Countering Domestic 

Terrorism 

Responsive comments should 

examine the intersection of domestic 

terrorism activities and privacy and 

civil liberties implications at the Federal 

and the SLTT level, both directly (e.g., 

JTTFs, Fusion Centers) and indirectly 

(e.g., federal funds used to purchase 

SLTT surveillance capabilities; SLTT 

use of federal resources, etc.), including 

the following questions: 

• What are the potential privacy and 

civil liberties issues raised by this 

cooperation? 

• What safeguards, mitigations, or 

oversight may be needed to protect 

against potentially harmful effects? 

Use of Technology in Efforts To Combat 

Domestic Terrorism 

Responsive comments should 

examine the use of technology in 

investigating and countering domestic 

terrorism, including the following 

questions: 

• How is the government using 

technology to counter domestic 

terrorism? 

• Are the technologies and policies 

used to counter international terrorism 

being applied to domestic terrorism, 

either by the government or by private 

firms; and if so, what are the potential 

privacy and civil liberties implications 

for the American public? 

• In what ways do private technology 

firms work with the government to 

counter domestic terrorism and does 

this raise further privacy and civil 

liberties issues? 

• What challenges and opportunities, 

for countering domestic terrorism and 

for protecting privacy and civil liberties 

in counterterrorism programs, are 

created by current and likely future 

technology changes? 

• What safeguards, mitigations, or 

oversight may be needed to protect 

against potentially harmful effects? 

Differential Impacts on Racial and 

Other Minority Groups 

Per Executive Order 13985 and 

PCLOB’s efforts to enhance equity, the 

PCLOB seeks comments on potential 

differential impacts of countering 

domestic terrorism programs and 

policies on particular racial groups, 

historically underserved communities, 

religious groups, politically disfavored 

groups, and other individuals. 

Responsive comments should examine: 

• To what extent do government 

efforts to combat domestic terrorism 

have differential impacts on particular 

racial groups, historically underserved 

communities, religious groups, 

politically disfavored groups, and other 

individuals? 

• What safeguards, mitigations, or 

oversight may be needed to protect 

against potentially harmful effects? 

Any Other Privacy or Civil Liberties 

Implications Related to Domestic 

Terrorism 

The Board welcomes comments on 

any other privacy or civil liberties 

concerns related to domestic terrorism 

not listed above. 

David Coscia, 

Agency Liaison Officer, Office of Presidential 

& Congressional Agency Liaison Services, 

General Services Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2022–07011 Filed 4–1–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6820–B5–P 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES