alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021072EN.01003401.xml

| 1.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/34

---

Action brought on 15 January 2021 — Miquel y Costas & Miquel v EUIPO (Pure Hemp)

(Case T-17/21)

(2021/C 72/45)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Miquel y Costas & Miquel, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: J. Mora Cortés, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU figurative mark Pure Hemp — Application for registration No 18 132 358

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 October 2020 in Case R 853/2020-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul/revoke the contested decision, in so far as it dismisses appeal R 853/2020-1 and partially denies EU mark No 18 132 358 Pure Hemp (figurative); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul/revoke the contested decision, in so far as it dismisses appeal R 853/2020-1 and partially denies EU mark No 18 132 358 Pure Hemp (figurative);

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those related to the proceedings before the Operations Department and before the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those related to the proceedings before the Operations Department and before the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b), in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation 2017/1001. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b), in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.

---
Order entered April 25 , 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 11

- 01467

- CV

LEONARD LEVINE AND HENRY CANTU, PARTNER SHIP

STYLED BEST ONE, Appellant s

V.

UNIQUE BEVERAGE COMP ANY, DALE PAPPAS, ATKINSON

- CRAWFORD

SALES, CO ., AND SCOTT GIBBONS

, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 10

- 13075 J



### O RDER

Appellants’ Motion for Rehearing is hereby DENIED

.

/s/ MARTIN RICHTER

JUSTICE
#### STATE v. SARGENT

20170747

Supreme Court of Utah.

11-14-2017

20160687

Petition for Writ of Certiorari Denied.
# C_2021320EN.01004501.xml

| 9.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/45

---

Action brought on 14 June 2021 — mBank v EUIPO — European Merchant Bank (EMBANK European Merchant Bank)

(Case T-331/21)

(2021/C 320/51)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: mBank S.A. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: E. Skrzydło-Tefelska and K. Gajek, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: European Merchant Bank UAB (Vilnius, Lithuania)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark EMBANK European Merchant Bank — European Union trade mark No 18 048 966

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 March 2021 in Case R 1845/2020-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Article 27(4) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Article 27(4) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.

---
# STATE OF CONNECTICUT

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

HEARINGCERTIFICATION This certifies in accordance with the provisions ofTitle 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 51 .102 that thefollowing actions were taken regarding the proposed amendment of RCSA sections 22a-174-20, 22a-174-32(b)(3) and 22a-174-33(f)(6) : 1) The public hearingwas held on May 28, 2009 as announced in the notice of hearing (copyattached) ; 2) In accordance with the notice, materials were available for review in each Air Quality Control Region (AQCR) in Connecticut; 3) Copies ofthe notice were mailed to the directors ofthe air pollution control agencies in New

York, New

Jersey, Rhode Island and Massachusetts alongwith a copy to the Director ofthe Air Management Division of Region I ofthe U .S
. Environmental Protection Agency; and 4) The notice ofhearing was published in four area newspapers as follows: Newspaper AQCR Connecticut Post 43 Hartford Courant 42 New London Day 41 The Register Citizen 44
April 28, 2010 Date April 21, 2009 April 21, 2009 April 21, 2009 April 21, 2009

Date Me B

(Printed on Recycled Paper) 79 Elm Street " Hartford, CT 06106-5127 www .ct.gov/dep An Equal Opportunity Employer
<PAGE>   1


                                                                     EXHIBIT 11


                    COMPUTATION OF NET EARNINGS AND SHARES
                  USED IN ARRIVING AT NET EARNINGS PER SHARE
                  THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               Primary and Fully Diluted
                                                               -------------------------
                                                      Three Months Ended           Nine Months Ended    
                                                        March 31, 1997              March 31, 1997      
                                                      ------------------           -----------------    
<S>                                                     <C>                          <C>                 
Earnings:                                                                                                
                                                                                                         
Net earnings                                            $    1,281,848                   3,291,388       
                                                                                                         
Less:  Dividends on preferred stock                               --                          --         
                                                        --------------              --------------       
                                                                                                         
Net earnings applicable to common stock                 $    1,281,848                   3,291,388       
                                                        ==============              ==============       
                                                                                                         
Computation of weighted number of shares outstanding:                                                    
                                                                                                         
Shares outstanding on a diluted basis                                                                    
                                                             5,455,633                   5,455,411       
                                                        ==============              ==============       
</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

XIAOMEI CHENG, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 15-73891 

Agency No. A206-532-904 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 17, 2022**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Xiaomei Cheng, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of 

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision denying her applications for asylum, withholding of 

removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-73891 

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the 

agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility 

determinations under the REAL ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 

1039-40 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination 

based on inconsistencies in Cheng’s testimony and documentary evidence 

regarding the dates of her abortion and her divorce. See id. at 1048 (adverse 

credibility finding reasonable under the totality of the circumstances). Cheng’s 

explanations do not compel a contrary conclusion. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 

1245 (9th Cir. 2000). Thus, in the absence of credible testimony, in this case, 

Cheng’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 

348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003). In light of this disposition, we need not reach 

Cheng’s remaining contentions regarding corroboration or the merits of her claims. 

See Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 538 (9th Cir. 2004) (courts and agencies 

are not required to decide issues unnecessary to the results they reach).

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT protection

because Cheng’s claim was based on the same testimony the agency found not 

credible, and Cheng does not point to any other evidence in the record that compels 

the conclusion that it is more likely than not she would be tortured in China. See

Farah, 348 F.3d at 1157.
3 15-73891 

We do not consider the materials Cheng references in her opening brief that 

are not part of the administrative record. See Fisher v. INS, 79 F.3d 955, 963-64 

(9th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until the mandate issues.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
# C_2021217EN.01004901.xml

| 7.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/49

---

Action brought on 31 March 2021 — Novelis Deutschland v EUIPO — Cuki Cofresco (grill dish)

(Case T-173/21)

(2021/C 217/64)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Novelis Deutschland GmbH (Göttingen, Germany) (represented by: U. Herberth, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Cuki Cofresco Srl (Volpiano, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant

Design at issue: Community design No 516836-0007 (grill dish)

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 February 2021 in Case R 1856/2019-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | dismiss the application for a declaration that the contested Community design is invalid; |
| --- | --- |

—

dismiss the application for a declaration that the contested Community design is invalid;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred in the appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred in the appeal proceedings.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.

---
<PAGE>


                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934

        Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): April 30, 2003

                           LANDRY'S RESTAURANTS, INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

           Delaware                     000-22150               74-0405386
(State or other jurisdiction of  (Commission File Number)     (IRS Employer
        incorporation)                                      Identification No.)

         1510 West Loop South,
            Houston, Texas                                      77027
(Address of principal executive offices)                     (Zip Code)


Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (713) 850-1010

<PAGE>



                    INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT

Item 7. Exhibits.

     (c) Exhibits.

         *99.1    Landry's Restaurants, Inc. Press Release dated April 30, 2003.
-------------
         * Furnished herewith.

Item 9. Regulation FD Disclosure.

     The following information required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 12 -
"Results of Operations and Financial Condition" is being furnished under Item 9
- "Regulation FD Disclosure" in accordance with the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Final Rule Release No. 33-8216.

     On April 30, 2003, Landry's Restaurants, Inc. issued a press release
setting forth its financial results for the quarter ending March 31, 2003. A
copy of the press release is furnished herewith as exhibit 99.1


                                       2

<PAGE>


                                    SIGNATURE

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.

                                   LANDRY'S RESTAURANTS, INC.

                                   By:      /S/ TILMAN J. FERTITTA
                                       ------------------------------------
                                            Tilman J. Fertitta,
                                            Chairman of the Board, President and
                                            Chief Executive Officer

Dated: April 30, 2003

                                       3
DISTRICTOFCOLUMBIA Uniformed..

Mail,Fax,Email

Election/Registrar's

O

ffice

Internet

DM

V

PublicAssistance

O

ffice

DisabilitiesAgency

Military

RecruitmentO

ffice

OtherStateAgencyRegistrationDrives

Registration:Other

101,760

22,576

39,983

4,760 458 89 74 189 0 0

RegistrationSource

1

176

177

BallotsRejected

TotalRegisteredVoters(A1a)

493,287

SectionA-VoterRegistration

RegistrationFormsReceived(A5a)

169,889

NotificationsSent(A10a)

0

Polling

Place

UOCAVA Absentee Provisional

Ballot

EarlyVote

Center

Voteby

Mail

Turnout:

Other

186,326

101,077

16,625

4,366 3,447 0 0

SectionF-TurnoutbyMethod

CountedFull Counted

Part

Rejected Provisional:

Other

1,990

1,457

0 0

SectionE-ProvisionalBallots

127

4,062

4,189

BallotsCounted

UniformedService

Non-militaryOverseas

Other

SectionB-UOCAVA

DISTRICTOFCOLU..

170

3,988

4,158

BallotsTransmitted

TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL

ProvisionalBallotTotal:3,447 TurnoutTotal:311,841

2016EAVSDataBrief
(logo)pwc

 

 

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

To the Board of Directors and Managementof

Prudential Asset Resources, Inc.:

 

We have examined management's assertion, included in theaccompanying Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable ServicingCriteria, that Prudential Asset Resources, Inc. (the "Company")compliedwiththeservicingcriteriasetforthinItem1122(d)oftheSecuritiesandExchangeCommission's Regulation AB for the Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security Transactions- RegAB Portfolio (the "Platform"), as of December 31, 2016 and forthe year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C)&(D),1122(d)(3)(ii),1122(d)(3)(iii),1122(d)(3)(iv),and1122(d)(4)(xv),whichthe Company has determined are not applicable to the activitiesperformed by it with respect to the Platform. Exhibit C to management'sassertion identifies the individual asset-backed transactions and securitiesdefined by management as constituting the Platform. Management is responsiblefor the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility isto express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordancewith attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board(United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidenceabout the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria andperforming such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset-backedtransactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selectedservicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether theCompany processed those selected transactions and performed those selectedactivities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedureswere limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed bythe Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were notdesigned to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurredprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances oramounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by thisreport. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for ouropinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany's compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management's assertionthat the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteriaas of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 for the Platform is fairlystated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 22, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopersLLP, 300 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017*

*T:(646) 471 3000, F: (646) 471 8320, www.pwc.com/us*
2022 EAVS Data Brief: Texas EAVS Jurisdictions:

254 

 Voter Registration 

Active Reg. Voters as of Nov. 8, 20221 

15,847,341 

Reg. Forms Received2* 

5,380,314 

Total Confirmation Notices Sent3* 

1,811,745 

Voters Removed from Reg. Rolls4* 

2,029,283 

Source of Registration Applications5 

Motor Vehicle Dept. 64.5% 

Mail, Email, Fax 23.6% 

In Person 5.3% 

Other 4.0% 

Online 2.5% 

 Voting and Turnout 

Voters Participating By Mode6 

7 Turnout 

42.1% 

In-Person 

Election Day 

2,590,664 

31.8% 

Mail 

356,987 

4.4% 

In-Person 

Early 

5,176,910 

63.5% 

Other 

27,029 

0.3% 

Total Voting Locations8: 6,286

Total Poll Workers9: 35,936 

Election Technology 

Percentage of Jurisdictions Using...10 

94.1% 

Scanners 

90.2% 

Electronic 

Poll 

Books 

62.6% 

Ballot 

Marking 

Devices 

21.3% 

DREs w/o

VVPAT 

5.5% 

Hand 

Counting

0.0% 

DREs with 

VVPAT 

 Mail Ballots 

• 444,150 mail ballots transmitted11 

• 83.2% of transmitted mail ballots returned by voters12 

• 96.6% of returned mail ballots counted13 

• 3.4% of returned mail ballots rejected14 

• Did not conduct all-mail election15 

• Did not allow drop boxes16 

• Allowed ballot curing17 

 Election Audits18 

-- Access audit 

-- Ballot design audit 

Ballot reconciliation ✔ audit 

Compliance/ ✔ procedural audit 

-- Eligibility audit 

-- Legal audit 

Logic and accuracy ✔ testing 

Post-election ✔ tabulation audit 

-- Other 

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at www.eac.gov 

/research-and-data/datasets-codebooks-and-surveys. 

Responses of “Does not apply,” “Data not available,” and “Valid 

skip” are shown as zeroes or dashes. Percentages may not sum 

to 100% because of missing data or rounding. 

* Close of registration for 2020 

general election to close of 

registration for 2022 general 

election. 

1 A1b of EAVS. 

2 A3a of EAVS. 

3 A8a of EAVS. 

4 A9a of EAVS. 

5 Mail, Email, Fax is A4a/A3a. 

In Person is A4b/A3a. Online is 

A4c/A3a. Motor Vehicle Dept. is 

A4d/A3a. Other is the sum of 

A4e–A4l/A3a. May not sum to 

100% because of missing data. 

6 In-Person Election Day is F1b. 

Mail is F1d+F1g. In-Person Early 

is F1f. Other is F1c+F1e+F1h. 

7 F1a of EAVS divided by citizen 

voting age population (CVAP). 

8 D2a of EAVS. 

9 D7a of EAVS. 

10 F3a–f, F5a–F9a of EAVS; 

number of jurisdictions that 

responded “Yes” divided by

number of jurisdictions in 

state/territory. 

11 C1a of EAVS. 

12 C1b/C1a of EAVS. 

13 C8a/C1b of EAVS. 

14 C9a/C1b of EAVS. 

15 Q17 and Q17a of Policy 

Survey. 

16 Q19 of Policy Survey. 

17 Q20 of Policy Survey. 

18 Q36 of Policy Survey. See 

survey questionnaire for full 

definitions of each type of 

audit.