alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 260 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 260

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a commemorative postage stamp 
 should be issued honoring Paul Leroy Robeson, and that the Citizens' 
Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend to the Postmaster General in 
   1998, during which occurs the 100th anniversary of Paul Robeson's 
                  birth, that such a stamp be issued.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 1, 1998

    Mr. Rush (for himself and Mr. Pallone) submitted the following 
     concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Congress that a commemorative postage stamp 
 should be issued honoring Paul Leroy Robeson, and that the Citizens' 
Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend to the Postmaster General in 
   1998, during which occurs the 100th anniversary of Paul Robeson's 
                  birth, that such a stamp be issued.

Whereas April 9, 1998, is the centennial of the birth of Paul Leroy Robeson;
Whereas Paul Leroy Robeson lost his mother, Anna, in a household fire, and was 
        reared in humble circumstances as 1 of 5 children in a single-parent 
        household by his father, William Drew Robeson, a Presbyterian minister, 
        who graduated from Lincoln University;
Whereas despite difficult circumstances, as a child, Paul Leroy Robeson showed 
        significant promise as an honor student, thespian, and athlete;
Whereas Paul Leroy Robeson graduated from Rutgers University in 1919, with 
        letters in basketball, baseball, discus, shot put, football, and 
        javelin, and, more importantly, was a member of both the Phi Beta Kappa 
        and Cap and Skull honor societies at Rutgers University;
Whereas Paul Leroy Robeson graduated from Columbia Law School in 1923, but found 
        the legal profession so resistant to African-American lawyers that he 
        embarked on a career in the theater and arts which brought him world 
        renown; and
Whereas Paul Leroy Robeson became an advocate for the rights of African-
        Americans and other oppressed people, and in so doing sacrificed his 
        career as a world-renowned actor and singer: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) a commemorative postage stamp should be issued by the 
        United States Postal Service honoring Paul Leroy Robeson; and
            (2) the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend 
        to the Postmaster General that such a stamp be issued.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 7 (Friday, January 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1445-1446]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-555]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-408-014]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

January 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 31, 1996, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Columbia) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets set forth on 
Appendix A to the filing, to become effective February 1, 1997.
    Columbia states that on November 22, 1996, it filed an Offer of 
Settlement (Settlement) in this proceeding and in several other 
dockets. In submitting the Settlement, Columbia represented that it 
would seek Commission authorization to move the Settlement rates into 
effect pending evaluation of the Settlement by the Presiding 
Administrative Law Judge and the Commission.
    Columbia states further that the Settlement is supported, or not 
opposed, by all of Columbia's customers, as well as other parties of 
interest, including producers, industrial users, and representatives of 
consumer interests at the State level. Accordingly, the filing seeks to 
move the Settlement rates into effect on February 1, 1997, as to all 
customers. Columbia states that it is submitting this request at the 
urging of its customers, who desire to realize the

[[Page 1446]]

benefits of their bargain as soon as possible.
    Any person desiring to protect this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protest must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-555 Filed 1-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
### Open Literature Review Screen Chemical Name: Atrazine 

### CAS No: 1912-24-9 

### Citation: Lytle, T. F. and J. S. Lytle (2005). "Growth inhibition as indicator ofstress because ofatrazine following multiple toxicant exposure ofthe freshwater macrophyte, Juncus effusus L." Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 24(5): 1198-1203. (ECOTOX #081731). 

### (\ittf-l I? L.j

### <tZ-b 

## 1/

## '2-'3) Date ofScreen: 08/21/09 

### Rationale for Not Conducting a Full Open Literature Review Summary: The study evaluates the effects ofatrazine combined with various mixtures ofchlorpyrifos, monosodium methanearsonate and/or methylmercury. The single atrazine active ingredient was evaluated; however, endpoints specific for aquatic plants are not provided for it. 

### Primary Reviewer: Lisa Muto, StaffScientist, Cambridge Environmental Inc. 

### Secondary Reviewer: Teri Myers, Senior Scientist, Cambridge Environmental Inc.



# 1111.11111 2087848
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8439 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 

any interest paid on an overpayment of tax. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2020 

Ms. SPANBERGER (for herself and Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 

from gross income any interest paid on an overpayment 

of tax. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Freeing Americans’ 

5 Interest Reimbursements From Improper Governmental 

6 Holdover Taxes Act’’ or the ‘‘FAIR FIGHT Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. INTEREST RECEIVED ON OVERPAYMENTS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part III of subchapter B of chap9 ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended 

10 by inserting before section 140 the following new section: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8439 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 139I. INTEREST RECEIVED ON TAX OVERPAYMENTS. 

2 ‘‘Gross income shall not include any interest allowed 

3 and paid upon an overpayment of tax pursuant to section 

4 6611.’’. 

5 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made by this 

6 section shall apply to taxable years beginning after the 

7 date of the enactment of this section. 

8 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

9 for Part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the Internal 

10 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting before the 

11 item relating to section 140 the following new item: 

‘‘139I. Interest received on tax overpayments.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.5

[LOGO - NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.]


                CONSENT OF NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.

We hereby consent to the references to our firm in Amendment No. 2 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-4 of Plains Exploration & Production Company,
and to the use of its reports as of January 1, 2002 and January 1, 2003, setting
forth the interests of Plains Exploration & Production Company and its
subsidiaries, and Arguello, Inc. relating to the estimated quantities of such
companies' proved reserves of oil and gas and present values thereof for the
periods included therein.


                                           NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.


                                              By:   /s/ J. Carter Henson, Jr.
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  J. Carter Henson, Jr.
                                                  Senior Vice President

Houston, Texas
April 29, 2003
No. 11-9433.

#### Nunnery *v.*Nevada.

Sup. Ct. Nev. Certiorari denied.
#### Lorena Lizabeth Barillas GALINDO, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 16-74040

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted * December 18, 2017

Filed December 21, 2017

Eduardo A. Paredes, Attorney, Law Office of Eduardo A. Paredes, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner

John Beadle Holt, Esquire, Trial Attorney, OIL, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Lorena Lizabeth Barillas Galindo, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum and -withholding of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252, We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. *Zehatye v. Gonzales,*453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The record does not compel the conclusion that Barillas Galindo established extraordinary or changed circumstances to excuse her untimely asylum application. *See*8 C.F.R. §§ 1208.4(a)(4), (5); *Toj-Culpatan v. Holder,*612 F.3d 1088, 1091-92 (9th Cir. 2010). Thus, we deny the petition as to asylum.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Barillas Galindo’s contentions as to past persecution. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004) (court lacks jurisdic*912tion to review claims not presented to the agency).

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s conclusion that Barillas Galindo failed to establish a nexus between the harm he fears and a protected ground. *See Zetino v. Holder,*622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (“An [applicant’s] desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground.”). Thus, Barillas Galindo’s withholding of removal claim fails.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32.2

      Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applied Imaging Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Barry
Hotckies, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: August 4, 2003        By:      /s/ Barry Hotchkies
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                            Barry Hotchkies
                            Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


      This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**[LETTERHEAD OF RYDER SCOTT]**

 

**Exhibit 23.3**

 

**CONSENT OF RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.**

 

As independent petroleum engineers, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Form 10-K of Plains Exploration & ProductionCompany, as well as in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in such Form 10-K, information contained in our reserve reports as of December 31, 2002, December 31, 2001, and December 31, 2000 to the interests of PlainsExploration & Production Company and its subsidiaries (collectively the “Company”), relating to the estimated quantities of certain of the Company’s proved reserves of oil and gas and discounted future net income thereof for thespecific periods cited. We further consent to references to our firm under the headings “Oil and Gas Reserves” and “Supplemental reserve information (unaudited)”. 

 

/s/    RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                            4191
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    32900
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 43216
<PP&E>                                          251804
<DEPRECIATION>                                   71257
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  380145
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            49337
<BONDS>                                         385936
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      16096
<COMMON>                                            41
<OTHER-SE>                                     (82222)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    380145
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                138713
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    66824
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 37889
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               25141
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   8859
<INCOME-TAX>                                      4538
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               4321
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (2271)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2050
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Navient Student Loan Trust 2015-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
 
 4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and
 
 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as indenture trustee.
 
  
 
  
 /s/ CHRISTIAN LOWN
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **0 -**  **6 4**  **8 7** 

GREGORY T. GARY , Plaintiff

– Appell ant ,

v. CHARLES B. HANNA, Henrico Police Detective, Individual an d Official Capacity; BILL KEAUKER, Police Investigator, Individ ual and Official Capacity; J.D. HEDRICK, HPD Investigator, Individual and Official Capacity; J.W. ENSOR, Reporting Officer, Individual and Official Capacity; G.S. RUSSELL, JR., Review Supervisor, Individual and Official Capacity,
Defendant s – Appell ee s .
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Jerome B. Friedman , District Judge. ( 2 : 1 0

- c v - 0 01 04

- J BF

- F BS )

Submitted : June 1 , 2010 Decided: June 9, 2010

Before GREGORY , S HEDD , and KEENAN, Circ uit Judges.

Affirme d by un published per curiam opinion

.

Gregory T. Gary , Appellant Pro Se

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Gregory T. Gary appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1 983 (200 6 ) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915 A ( b )( 1 ) (200 6 ) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gary v. Hanna , No. 2:10

- cv - 00104

- JBF

- FBS
(E.D. Va. Mar. 23, 2010)

. We further deny Gary’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th e court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2023104EN.01002203.xml

| 20.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/22

---

Order of the President of the Court of 9 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main — Germany) — flightright GmbH v Transportes Aéreos Portugueses SA (TAP)

(Case C-388/22, (1) flightright)

(2023/C 104/34)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 318, 22.8.2022.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
third quarter 1996 10-Q for LabOne, Inc. and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000816151
<NAME> LABONE, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       2,790,173
<SECURITIES>                                27,852,502
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,842,807
<ALLOWANCES>                                   571,285
<INVENTORY>                                  1,574,919
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            43,641,768
<PP&E>                                      52,523,818
<DEPRECIATION>                              36,923,752
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              64,701,581
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,965,332
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       150,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  59,586,249
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                64,701,581
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            42,814,221
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               23,665,043
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,084,757
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,265,044
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,819,713
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,819,713
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14
        

</TABLE>