alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
59,792

1,386

17,984

79,162

BallotsCounted

1,014

2,806

190

4,010

BallotsRejected

CALIFORNIA

Mail,Fax,Email

Election/Registrar's

Office

Internet

DM

V

Public

Assistance

Office

DisabilitiesAgency

Military

RecruitmentOffice

OtherState

Agency

RegistrationDrives

Registration:Other

2,315,778

5,110,692

1,176,126

636,153

694,209

274,329

320,574

16,171

40,336

7,059

RegistrationFormSource

TotalRegisteredVoters

24,486,638

SectionA-VoterRegistration

RegistrationFormsReceived

10,621,987

ConfirmationNotificationsSent

1,423,191

Polling

Place

UOCAVA Absentee Provisional

Ballot

EarlyVote

Center

Voteby

Mail

Turnout:

Other

3,274,149

8,453,062

1,110,814

79,677 58,861 21,734 0

SectionF-TurnoutbyMethod

CountedFull Counted

Part

Rejected Provisional:

Other

898,441

151,783

193,534

60,590

SectionE-ProvisionalBallots

UniformedService

Non-militaryOverseas

Other

SectionB-UOCAVA

16,352

44,827

818

61,997

BallotsTransmitted

TOTAL TOTAL

ProvisionalBallotTotal:1,307,190 TurnoutTotal:14,610,494

Select: CALIFORNIA

TOTAL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                          

  

2016EAVSDataBrief 

U i
June 26, 2012

No. 11-10820 (11A1193).

#### Villegas Lopez *v.*Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Kennedy, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.
#### GOOGLE LLC, Appellant v. NETWORK-1 TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellee

2017-1379

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: January 23, 2018

Erika Arner, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Reston, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by, Joshua Goldberg, J. Michael Jakes, Washington, DC.

Jonas Bram Jacobson, Dovel & Luner, LLP, Santa Monica, CA, argued for appel-lee, Also represented by Gregory S. Dovel, Sean Luner, Matthaeus Martino-Wein-HARDT; JUNG SUK HaHM, CHARLES R. MaCEDO, Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP, New York, NY.

Before Lourie, Taranto, and Chen, Circuit Judges.

Chen, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Google' Inc. appeals from the final written decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) in a- covered business method (CBM) post-grant review proceeding concerning Network-1 Technologies, Inc.’s U.S. Patent No. 8,904,464 (the ’464 Patent).

In the decision, the Board ruled that claims 1-34 of the ’464 Patent were not proven unpatentable. In so ruling, the Board considered the proper construction of the term “machine-readable instructions,” which is recited in all claims. Based on the evidence and arguments provided by the parties, the Board concluded that “machine-readable instructions” would have been understood as “code or pseudo-code that is executable by a computer processor.” J.A. 8.

This court finds no error in the Board’s construction of “machine-readable instructions.” .Substantial evidence supports the factual findings underlying the Board’s construction. We are also not persuaded by Google’s argument that the intrinsic evidence contradicts the Board’s construction. In view of this construction and the arguments and evidence Google presented below, we conclude that the Board did not err in determining that Google did not meet its burden of proving that the claims of the ’464 Patent are unpatentable.

For the foregoing reasons, we affirm.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Abcor Products,
Inc. (the "Company") certifies that:

1.      The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period
ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

August 18, 2005                           /s/ Jeremy Feakins
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Jeremy Feakins (Chief Executive
                                           Officer and Chief Financial Officer)
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                        CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 302


I, Robert Johnston, Jr., certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tutogen
Medical, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) [reserved] / [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238
and 34-47986];

         c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and
         5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

<PAGE>

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: July 6, 2006



/s/ Robert Johnston, Jr.
-----------------------------
Robert Johnston, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                Name                            State of Incorporation
                ----                            ----------------------

Orthodontic Centers of Alabama, Inc.                    Delaware
Orthodontic Centers of Arizona, Inc.                    Delaware
Orthodontic Centers of California, Inc.                 Delaware
Orthodontic Centers of Colorado, Inc.                   Delaware
Orthodontic Centers of Connecticut, Inc.                Delaware
Orthodontic Centers of Florida, Inc.                    Delaware
Orthodontic Centers of Georgia, Inc.                    Delaware
Orthodontic Centers of Illinois, Inc.                   Delaware
Orthodontic Centers of Indiana, Inc.                    Delaware
Orthodontic Centers of Kentucky, Inc.                   Delaware
Orthodontic Centers of Louisiana, Inc.                  Delaware
Orthodontic Centers of Maryland, Inc.                   Delaware
Orthodontic Centers of Massachusetts, Inc.              Delaware
Orthodontic Centers of Minnesota, Inc.                  Delaware
Orthodontic Centers of Mississippi, Inc.                Delaware
Orthodontic Centers of Nevada, Inc.                     Nevada
Orthodontic Centers of New Jersey, Inc.                 Delaware
Orthodontic Centers of North Carolina, Inc.             Delaware
Orthodontic Centers of Ohio, Inc.                       Delaware
Orthodontic Centers of Oregon, Inc.                     Delaware
Orthodontic Centers of Pennsylvania, Inc.               Delaware
Orthodontic Centers of Rhode Island, Inc.               Delaware
Orthodontic Centers of South Carolina, Inc.             Delaware
Orthodontic Centers of Tennessee, Inc.                  Delaware
Orthodontic Centers of Texas, Inc.                      Delaware
Orthodontic Centers of Virginia, Inc.                   Delaware
Orthodontic Centers of Washington, Inc.                 Delaware
Orthodontic Centers of West Virginia, Inc.              Delaware
Orthodontic Centers of Wisconsin, Inc.                  Delaware
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 16.1

Office of the Chief Accountant
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549


May 7, 2002


Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have read the second and third paragraphs of Item 4 included in the Form 8-K
dated May 7, 2002 of Lufkin Industries, Inc. to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and are in agreement with the statements contained therein.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
Arthur Andersen LLP

cc:  Mr. R.D. Leslie, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                    ------------

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Golden River Resources
Corporation  (the "Company") for the six months ended December 31, 2009 as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"),
the  undersigned,  Peter  Lee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  that:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)     The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result  of operations of the Company.

Date:    February 15, 2010

                                              /S/Peter Lee
                                              ------------
                                              Peter Lee
                                              Director,  Secretary  and
                                              Chief  Financial  Officer

                                       36
### R u l e 233
J ohn F i nn e ll

t o : I d a li a P ere z 04 / 08 / 2011 03 : 16 P M
H i d e D e t a il s F r o m: J ohn F i nn e ll < J F i nn e ll @p l acer

. ca

. g o v>

To : I d a li a P ere z /R 9 / U S E P A / U S @E P A

1 A tt ac h m e n t

R u le 2 33 c o m p a r i s o n

. x l s x



### Id alia,

A tt ac h e d i s a c o m p aris o n o f t h e e m iss

i o n s f o r t h e tw o b o il e rs a t P lac

e r w h ic h m u s t m ee t R u l e 2 3

3

.

T h e 1 1 5 pp m v c

o rr e c te d t o 1 2 % C O 2 w o u l d c o r r e s p o n d t o 59

. 7 p o und s p e r h o u r a nd 0

. 1 4 l b s / M M B t u a t
t h e S i e rra P acif i c Indu s t ri e s (s t o k e r b o il e r )

.

T h e 1 1 5 pp m v c

o rr e c te d t o 1 2 % C O 2 w o u l d c o r r e s p o n d t o 95

. 1 p o und s p e r h o u r a nd 0

. 2 4 l b s /M M B t u a t
t h e R i o Br a v o (circ u l a t i ng fl u i d i z e d b e d b o il e r)

.

D u ri ng s t ar t up a nd s

hu t d o w n

, t h e l i m i t

s i n t h e t a b l e 3 02

. 1

. 2 a r e l o we r t h a n t h e e qu i v

al e n t p p mv l i m i t

.

D o e s t h a t h e l p a n s

we r y o u r qu e s t i o n ?

J ohn F i nn e l l S r

. A i r P o l l u t i on Co n t r o l E n g i n ee r Pl a c e r Co u n t y A P C D 309 1 Co u n t y

C e nte r D r i v e, S u i te 2 40 A u b u r n, C A 9 56 03 ( 530 ) 7 4 5

- 2 3 24

C O N F ID E N T I A LI T Y

N O T IC E : T h i s c o m m un i c at i on w i t h i t s c on t ent s m a y c o nt a i n c on f i de n t i a l a nd / o r l e g a ll y p r i v i l e g ed i n f o r m at i on. It i s s o l e l y f o r the u s e o f the i nt e nd e d r e c i p i e nt (s) . Unau t ho r i z e d i nte rc e p t i on, r e v i e w
, u s e o r d i sc l o s u r e i s p r o h i b i t e d a n d m a y v i o l a t e a pp l i c a b l e l a w s i n c l u d i n g t h e El e c t r o n i c C o m m un i c at i on s P r i v a c y A c t. I f y o u a r e n ot t he i nt e nd e d r e c i p i e nt, p l e a s e c onta c t the s e nde r and de s t r o y

a ll c o p i e s o f the c o m m un i c at i on.Tw o s ou r ces a r e a ff ec t e d b y R u le 233

S ie rr a P aci f ic I ndu s t r ies 41 4 MM B tu/hr S to ke r B o iler C O @ 12 % C O 2 145.8
l b s /h r 46.05
l b s /h r i f C O w e r e 1000 pp m v 315.8
l b s /MM B t u 0.76

N Ox @ 12 % C O 2 62.5
l b s /h r 32.43
l b s /h r i f N Ox w e r e 115 pp m v 59.7
l b s /MM B t u 0.14

Ri o B r a vo 398. 5 MM B tu/hr Ci r u la t i ng F l u i d i z e d Bed C O @ 12 % C O 2 0.05
l b s /h r 0.03
l b s /h r i f C O w e r e 400 pp m v 240.0
l b s /MM B t u 0.60

N Ox @ 12 % C O 2 38.7
l b s /h r 32.0
l b s /h r i f N Ox w e r e 115 pp m v 95.1
l b s /MM B t u 0.24
No. 11-10389.

#### Basciano *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-50824

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAIME ESPARZA-REYES,

also known as Martin Garcia-Ruiz,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-02-CR-373-ALL-PRM

--------------------

February 20, 2003

Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jaime Esparza-Reyes appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States

after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He

contends that the sentence is invalid because it exceeds the

two-year maximum term of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(a). Esparza-Reyes complains that his sentence was

improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). He argues

that the sentencing provision is unconstitutional. 
No. 02-50824

-2-

Alternatively, Esparza-Reyes contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the

prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence was an

element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that

should have been alleged in his indictment. 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Esparza-Reyes acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
#### COM. v. APONTE, L.

3409 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/18/2017

CP-45-CR-0001062-2016

(Monroe)

Affirmed
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Air  Methods  Corporation (the
"Company")  on  Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the "Report"), I
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Aaron D. Todd
--------------------------------
Aaron D. Todd
Chief Executive Officer
November 8, 2006


/s/ Trent J. Carman
--------------------------------
Trent J. Carman
Chief Financial Officer
November 8, 2006

A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Air  Methods  Corporation  and will be retained by Air Methods and
furnished  to  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 44 (Thursday, March 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10259]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5455]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the Military Health Care Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Military Health Care Advisory Committee.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the forthcoming meeting of the 
Military Health Care Advisory Committee. This is the sixth meeting of 
the Committee. The purpose of the meeting is to have discussions 
centering around medical personnel for the Military Health Service 
System which will include recruitment, retention, and support for 
readiness; and the healthcare benefit; and approaches to meeting 
medical personnel requirements. A meeting session will be held and will 
be open to the public.

DATES: March 25, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Sheraton Crystal City Hotel, 1800 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, VA, unless otherwise published.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Gary A. Christopherson, Senior 
Advisor or Commander Sid Rodgers, Special Assistant to PDASD, Office of 
the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs), 1200 Defense 
Pentagon, Room 3E346, Washington, DC 20301-1200; telephone (703) 697-
2111.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Business sessions are scheduled between 9:30 
am and 5:00 pm, on Tuesday, March 25, 1997. Contact Elaine L. Powell, 
CMP, in the MHCAC Conference Support Office at (703) 575-5024, if you 
are interested in attending or need additional information concerning 
the agenda, directions, and maps to the meeting location.

    Dated: February 28, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-5455 Filed 3-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
#### COM. v. COLLINS, R.

2522 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/08/2017

CP-51-CR-0511S31 -2006 (Philadelphia)

Affirmed/Remanded
July 6, 2015

Mr. Matthew LeBlanc

Delta Media Corporation

3501 NW Evangeline Throughway

Carencro, LA 70520

Dear Mr. LeBlanc:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your April 3, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0884), but 

we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply

with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, 

you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Order entered August 29, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00891-CV

RICHARDSON TRIDENT COMPANY, INC. & THOMAS E. BENTLY, Appellants

V.

WHITE ROCK ADVISORS, LLC, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-04592

ORDER

The Court has before it the request of Vielica Dobbins, Official Court Reporter of the 

134th Judicial District Court, for an extension of time in which to file the reporter’s record in this 

case. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS the reporter’s record submitted on August 

22, 2013 timely filed as of that date.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE