alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8537 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8537

  To direct the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to 
modify any caps on emergency EIDL advances to certain veterans service 
                 organizations, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 6, 2020

 Mr. Golden (for himself and Mr. Kelly of Mississippi) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to 
modify any caps on emergency EIDL advances to certain veterans service 
                 organizations, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMOUNT OF EMERGENCY EIDL ADVANCES FOR CERTAIN VETERANS 
              SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Administrator of 
the Small Business Administration shall ensure that a veterans service 
organization with not more than one employee that applies for an 
advance under section 1110(e) of the CARES Act (15 U.S.C. 9005(e)) is 
not subject to a cap on such advance that is less than $5,000.
                                 <all>
```
08/25/2012 09:18 FAX 2024935142 FAA 

JtJn 22 2012 11:26AM OCRA - S<ln Diego Office 619·239·7838 

June 22, 2012 

Jesus Valdez 

4135 Broadway 

San Diego, CA 92102 

+ OMS 141002/004 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington] DC 20591 

VIA CERTIFIED MAIL AND FACSIMILE 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 000 

Re: FAA Case No. 2012WP090001 

To Whom It May Concern: 

I am the respondent in this case. Below you will find my answer to the complaint dated 

May 24, 2012 in this case. I request that the hearing in this matter be held in San 

Diego, CA. 

Answer 

I. 

Admitted. 

II. 

1. Denied. 

2. I am without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny. 

3. I am without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny. 

Ill. 
06/25/2012 09:19 FAX 2024935142 FAA 

Jun 22 2012 11:26AM OCRA - San Diego Office 619-239-7838 

1. Denied. 

2. Denied. 

Jesus Valdez 

4135 Broadway 

San Diego, CA 92102 

Denied. 

IV. 

I assert the following affirmative defenses: 

+ OMS ~ 003/004 

page 3 

1. A civil penalty in this case is inappropriate under the circumstances based on the 

nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the alleged violation. 

2. The amount of the proposed civil penalty in this case is inappropriate under the 

circumstances based on the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the 

· alleged violation. 

3. A civil penalty in this case is inappropriate due to my lack of culpability, lack of a 

history of prior violations, and inability to pay. A civil penalty( is inappropriate in 

part due to my intellectual disability. 

4. The amount of the proposed civil penalty in this case is inappropriate due to my 

lack of culpability, lack of a history of prior violations, and inability to pay. The 

amount of the proposed civil penalty is inappropriate in part due to my intellectual 

disability. 

Signed, 
-----------------------,-----------------------

06/25/2012 08: 18 FAX 2024835142 FAA 

Jvn 22 2012 11;26AM OCRA - San Diego Office 619-239·7838 

~ ""''~~ JC---valdez 

Jesus Valdez · 

4135 Broadway 

San Diego, CA 92102 

+ OMS Ill 004/004 

page 4 

cc: Theodore Byrne, Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel, Los Angeles, CA
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant To Section 1350Of Chapter 63 Of U.S.C.**

**As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 OfThe Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**

 

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of The Immune Response Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), which this written statement accompanies, I, John N.Bonfiglio, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to§ 1350 of Chapter 63 of 18 U.S.C., as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: May 12, 2004 | /s/ John N. Bonfiglio   |   |
|---------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                | John N. Bonfiglio       |
|                | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
# Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali C 179A/25 t

| | ISSN 1977-0987 |
| --- | --- |
| Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali
  tal-Unjoni Ewropea | C 179A |
| | |
| Edizzjoni bil-Malti | Informazzjoni u Avviżi | Volum 6125 ta' Mejju 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0987

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali

tal-Unjoni Ewropea

C 179A

Edizzjoni bil-Malti

Informazzjoni u Avviżi

Volum 6125 ta' Mejju 2018

---

| Werrej | Paġna |
| --- | --- |
| | Rettifika |
| 2018/C 179 A/01 | Rettifika għall-avviż ta’ reklutaġġ Nru PE/197/S ( ĠU C 144 A, 25.4.2018 ) | 1 |

Werrej

Paġna

Rettifika

2018/C 179 A/01

Rettifika għall-avviż ta’ reklutaġġ Nru PE/197/S ( ĠU C 144 A, 25.4.2018 )

( ĠU C 144 A, 25.4.2018 )

1

---

| MT | |
| --- | --- |

MT

---

Rettifika

| 25.5.2018 | MT | Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea | CA 179/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2018

MT

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea

CA 179/1

---

Rettifika għall-avviż ta’ reklutaġġ Nru PE/197/S

(
  Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali C 144 A tal-25 ta’ April 2018
  )

(2018/C 179 A/01)

F’paġna 1,

minflok:

“Il-Parlament Ewropew qed jorganizza proċedura ta’ selezzjoni abbażi ta’ kwalifiki u eżamijiet sabiex jistabbilixxi lista ta’ riżerva għal ħdax-il post ta’”,

aqra:

aqra:

“Il-Parlament Ewropew qed jorganizza proċedura ta’ selezzjoni abbażi ta’ kwalifiki u eżamijiet sabiex jistabbilixxi lista ta’ riżerva għal postijiet ta’”;

F’paġna 2, Titolu A. 1. Punti ġenerali, l-ewwel paragrafu,

F’paġna 2, Titolu A. 1. Punti ġenerali, l-ewwel paragrafu,

minflok:

minflok:

“Il-Parlament Ewropew iddeċieda li jniedi proċedura għall-post ta’ ħdax-il aġent temporanju tal-uffiċjali tal-protezzjoni personali (1) (AST 3) — id-Direttorat Ġenerali għas-Sigurtà u l-Protezzjoni, Direttorat għall-Prossimità u l-Assistenza, is-Sigurtà u s-Sikurezza.”,

aqra:

aqra:

“Il-Parlament Ewropew iddeċieda li jniedi proċedura għall-post ta’ aġenti temporanji tal-uffiċjali tal-protezzjoni personali (1) (AST 3) — id-Direttorat Ġenerali għas-Sigurtà u l-Protezzjoni, Direttorat għall-Prossimità u l-Assistenza, is-Sigurtà u s-Sikurezza.”.

---

(1)  Ir-referenzi kollha għal persuni ta’ sess maskili f’dan l-avviż jirreferu wkoll awtomatikament għall-persuni ta’ sess femminili, u viċe versa.

1

---
#### JAMES CORNEAU *v.*COMMISSIONER OF MOTOR VEHICLES

(AC 20040)

Schaller, Dranginis and Stoughton, Js.

Argued April 24

officially released May 22, 2001

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-28-2000
<CASH>                                             380
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,588
<ALLOWANCES>                                       966
<INVENTORY>                                    106,592
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               134,592
<PP&E>                                          66,579
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,960
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 246,259
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,904
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                3
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     123,596
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   246,259
<SALES>                                         35,874
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,874
<CGS>                                           21,359
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,359
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,280<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   326
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 975
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,987)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,987)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,987)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.26)
<FN>
<F1>OTHER EXPENSES CONSISTS OF ALL OPERATING COSTS AND EXCLUDES INTEREST,
NON-OPERATING INCOME AND INCOME TAXES.
</FN>


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7699

JAMES WAYNE CAVINESS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

J. R. HUNT, JR., Superintendent for the Columbus Correctional Institute,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief

District Judge. (CA-98-386)

Submitted: September 8, 2000 Decided: September 15, 2000

Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Wayne Caviness, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the order from which Caviness appeals was filed on

December 2, 1999, it was entered on the district court’s docket

sheet on December 6, 1999. December 6, 1999, is therefore the

effective date of the district court’s decision. See Fed. R. Civ.

P. 58 and 79(a); see also Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35

(4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

James Wayne Caviness seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no reversible error in its

determination that assuming Caviness’ claims are preserved for federal review, they are meritless. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on this reasoning of

the district court. See Caviness v. Hunt, No. CA-98-386 (W.D.N.C.

Dec. 6, 1999).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 10.11(e)


 


INNOVUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.


AMENDMENT TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED
8% CONVERTIBLE DEBENTUTRE


 


THIS AMENDMENT TO SECOND
AMENDED AND RESTATED 8% CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE (“Amendment”) is entered into as of February 19, 2014 (the “Effective
Date’), by and among Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Issuer”), and Bassam Damaj (“Debenture
Holder”).


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, the signatories hereto are parties
to that certain 8% Convertible Debenture, dated January 22, 2013, as amended and restated on March 18, 2013 and as amended and
restated on November 11, 2013 (collectively the “Debenture”).


 


WHEREAS, the signatories hereto desire to
enter into this Amendment to amend the Debenture as set forth herein.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending legally to be bound, agree as follows:


 


AGREEMENT


 


1.          Conversion
of Outstanding Principal and Interest. Issuer and Debenture Holder hereby agree to convert all of the current outstanding principal
and interest under the Debenture as of the Effective Date, which is $476,165, into common shares of the Issuer at the conversion
rate of $.40 per share for a total of 1,190,411 shares.


 


2.          Authority.
Debenture Holder hereby represents and warrants that he is the sole legal and beneficial owner of the Debenture and that no other
person has any interest (other than a community property interest) in the Debenture. Debenture Holder represents that he has the
full authority to execute this Second Amendment and not consents or approvals are required for such execution that have not been
obtained prior to execution.


 


3.          Ratification,
No Default or Conversion. Debenture Holder hereby confirms (a) the absence of any Event of Default under the Debenture and
(b) the absence of any conversion, pursuant to Section 1.2 or Section 3.1 of the Debenture or otherwise. Except as amended herein,
the Debenture shall remain in full force and effect.


 


4.          Entire
Agreement. This Amendment and Debenture constitute the entire agreement between the parties hereto and collectively supersede
any prior understandings, agreements or representations by or among the parties hereto, written or oral, to the extent they relate
in any way to the subject matter hereof. All other terms and conditions of the Debenture shall continue in full force and effect.


 


5.          Conflict
of Terms. In the event of any inconsistency between the provisions of this Amendment and any provisions of the Debenture, the
terms and provisions of this Amendment shall govern and control.


 



    	1



    	 



    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties
hereto have executed this Amendment to Debenture on the date first above written.


 


	 	INNOVUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Lynnete Dillen
	 	 	Lynnette Dillen
	 	 	Executive Vice President and CFO
	 	 	 
	 	DEBENTURE HOLDER
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Bassam Damaj
	 	 	Bassam Damaj


 




    	2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
              
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,064,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  780,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (631,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    889,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          93,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (92,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,259,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                     12,757,000
<COMMON>                                       532,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,000,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (24,665,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,259,000
<SALES>                                     13,484,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,926,000
<CGS>                                        8,435,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,455,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               460,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,149,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,862,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                870,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,732,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .36
<FN>
<F1>Current Assets and Current Liabilities values are zero because of an
unclassified balance sheet.
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(c)


           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS


      We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-4 of our reserve report to the interest of Plains Resources
Inc. and Subsidiary (collectively the Company) dated January 31, 1997, relating
to the estimated quantities of certain of the Company's proved reserves of oil
and gas and the related estimates of future net revenue and present values
thereof for certain periods, included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-
K for the year ended December 31, 1996, as well as in the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company in such annual report.  We also
consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Registration
Statement.


                                       NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.


                                       /s/ Frederic D. Sewell
                                       _____________________________________
                                       Frederic D. Sewell
                                       President


Dallas, Texas
August 13, 1997
<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 23

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

<PAGE>


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Citizens Holding Company of our report dated January 31, 2003, included in
the 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders of Citizens Holding Company. We also
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (File No. 333-89680) previously filed Citizens Holding Company of our report
dated January 31, 2003, included in the 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders of
Citizens Holding Company.

/s/ Horne CPA Group

Jackson, Mississippi
March 28, 2003
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that

have no pre cedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless
expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 93-2516

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HOSIE JAMES III, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(February 16, 1995)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Hosie James I II was convicted of possession with intent to

distribute over fifty grams of cr ack cocaine. The probation

officer determined that James' guidelines sentence range was 151-

188 months. The district court adopted the PSR and sentenced James

to a term of 160 months. James argues that the district court2

failed to supply adequate reasons for choosing the 160-month

sentence.

By stat ute, a sentencing court must consider the nature and

circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of

the defendant; the need for punishment, deterrence, public

protection and rehabilitation; the available sentences; the

guidelines and policy statements iss ued by the Sentencing

Commission; the need for consistency in sentencing; a nd the need

for restitution. 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). If a defendant's guidelines

sentencing range exce eds twenty-four months, the district court

must state in open court its reasons for selecting a particular

sentence within the range. I d. § 3553(c)(1). The sentencing court

must l ink the pertinent facts to the relevant statutory factors

supporting the sentence imposed. S ee United States v. Duran , 37

F.3d 557, 560-61 (9th Cir. 1994); United States v . Rosa , 11 F.3d

315, 344-45 (2d Cir. 1993), cert. denied , 114 S. Ct. 1565 (1994);

see also 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

James did n ot object to the district court's allegedly

inadequate reasons for imposing a 160-month sentence. Therefore,

we review for plain error. S ee United States v. Calverley
, 37 F.3d

160, 162 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc), petition for cert. filed
, ___

U.S.L.W.

___ (U.S. Jan. 18, 1995) (No. 94-7792). The requirements

enunciated in Calverley have not been met.

AFFIRMED.
# C_2021128EN.01004501.xml

| 12.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/45

---

Action brought on 19 February 2021 –Kanyama v Council

(Case T-105/21)

(2021/C 128/54)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Célestin Kanyama (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, A. Guillerme and T. Payan, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/2033 of 10 December 2020, in so far as the applicant remains at No 4 in the annex to that decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/2033 of 10 December 2020, in so far as the applicant remains at No 4 in the annex to that decision;

| — | annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2021 of 10 December 2020, in so far as the applicant remains at No 4 in the annex to that regulation; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2021 of 10 December 2020, in so far as the applicant remains at No 4 in the annex to that regulation;

| — | order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law, which are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-103/21, Boshab v Council.

---
Order entered October 22, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00550-CR

DOYLE GENE ROBERSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-55492-X

ORDER

Appellant’s October 20, 2015 second motion to extend the time to file appellant’s brief is 

before the Court. The record in this appeal shows the reporter’s record was not complete until an 

exhibit was filed on September 4, 2015. Because of the delay in filing a complete record, we 

GRANT appellant’s motion to the extent we EXTEND the time to file appellant’s brief until 

November 4, 2015. 

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE