alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>	5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
       
<S>							<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                             JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                         16,893
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    3,869
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                     0
<PP&E>                                                         389,933
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  79,180
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 357,866
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           68,726
<BONDS>                                                        258,466
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                                      25,429
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   357,866
<SALES>                                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                57,534
<CGS>                                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   34,427
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                12,960
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              15,415
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  9,566
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     3,723
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             5,843
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     5,843
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                     7.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     7.30


</TABLE>
No. 11-1541.

#### Coleman *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            Defense Threat Reduction Agency
                Defense Threat Reduction Agency
        Search
                    Search Defense Threat Reduction Agency:
                        Search
                Search Defense Threat Reduction Agency:
                    Search
    Home

    About
    
        DTRA Leadership

    DTRA History

    Mission

    Strategic Initiatives

    Foreign Malign Influence

    Agency Overview Brief (pdf)

    Agency Financial Report

    Careers & Opportunities
    
        Your Civilian Career

    Your Military Career

    Welcome Aboard

    Diversity and Inclusion

    Business
    
        DTRA Contract Award Data

    Office of Small Business

    Mentor Protege Program

    News & Media
    
        Press Center

    Contact Us

    Joint Operations Center  Press Releases

   DTRA Remembers Semipalatinsk Test Site 2021 - A Preview

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   
    

   

   MEDIA HOME

   RESOURCES

   PRESS RELEASES

   TESTIMONY

   SPECIAL EVENTS

   

   

   PUBLIC AFFAIRS CONTACT
   703-767-5870DTRA-PA@MAIL.MIL
 Stay Connected
                
                
                **ABOUT DTRA**The Defense Threat Reduction Agency enables DoD, the U.S. Government and International Partners to counter and deter Weapons of Mass Destruction and Emerging Threats.
    
    LEARN MORENews & Media »Operating Status »Work With Us »Directions to DTRA »
    
    DTRA logo
    
    **CONNECT WITH US**FOIA/Privacy | E.I. | Accessibility|USA.gov | DTRA Careers
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
STOCKBROKER PRESENTATIONS, INC.
                                   ADDENDA "A"
                           AFFILIATED RESOURCES, INC.

SPI  WILL  PROVIDE  THE  FOLLOWING  SERVICES:
     PROFILER  TEAM  WORKING  60,000  BROKER  DATA  BASE
     INTRODUCTION  TO  OUR  NETWORK  OF  MARKET  MAKERS
     BROKERAGE  FIRM  INTRODUCTIONS
     INVESTOR  LEAD  MANAGEMENT
     BROKER/INVESTOR  CONFERENCE  CALL  MANAGEMENT
     MARKET  SUPPORT
     DTC  ANALYSIS
TERMS:
------

1.     $50,000  OF ARCX STOCK  @ 30%DISCOUNT , BASED ON THE FIVE (5) DAY CLOSING
PRICE  FROM  THE  15TH  OF  THE  PREVIOUS  MONTH  OR .35 (WHICHEVER IS GREATER).
2.     $50,000  OF ARCX STOCK  @ 30 % DISCOUNT, BASED ON THE FIVE(5) DAY CLOSING
PRICE  FROM  THE  15TH  OF  THE  PREVIOUS  MONTH  OR .50 (WHICHEVER IS GREATER).
3      $50,000  OF ARCX STOCK @ 30 % DISCOUNT, BASED ON THE FIVE(5) DAY CLOSING
PRICE  FROM  THE  15TH  OF  THE  PREVIOUS  MONTH  OR .65 (WHICHEVER IS GREATER).
4.     $50,000 OF ARCX STOCK  @ 30% DISCOUNT, BASED ON THE FIVE (5) DAY CLOSING
PRICE  FROM  THE  15TH  OF  THE  PREVIOUS  MONTH  OR .80 (WHICHEVER IS GREATER).
5.     $50,000 OF ARCX STOCK  @ 30% DISCOUNT, BASED ON THE FIVE (5) DAY CLOSING
PRICE  FROM  THE  15TH  OF  THE  PREVIOUS  MONTH  OR .95 (WHICHEVER IS GREATER).
6.     $50,000 OF ARCX STOCK  @ 30% DISCOUNT, BASED ON THE FIVE (5) DAY CLOSING
PRICE  FROM  THE  15TH  OF  THE  PREVIOUS  MONTH OR 1.10 (WHICHEVER IS GREATER).
6-12   $50,000  MONTHLY OF ARCX STOCK @ 30%DISCOUNT, BASED ON THE FIVE (5) DAY
CLOSING  PRICE  FROM  THE  15TH  OF  THE  PREVIOUS  MONTH.

OPTIONS:
--------
400,000  @  .25  GRANTED  AFTER  THE  FIRST  30  DAYS  AFTER  SPI  BEGINS
400,000  @  .40  GRANTED  AFTER  THE  FIRST  60  DAYS  AFTER  SPI  BEGINS
400,000  @  .55      GRANTED  AFTER  THE  FIRST  90  DAYS  AFTER  SPI  BEGINS
400,000  @  .70  GRANTED  AFTER  THE  FIRST  120  DAYS  AFTER  SPI  BEGINS

SIGNATURE:____________________     SIGNATURE:_____________________
TITLE:______________DATE:______     TITLE:_______________DATE:______
WITNESSED  BY:_________________     WITNESSED  BY:__________________
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

Board of Directors
Sizeler Property Investors, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 
33-76134) on Form S-3 and in the registration statement (No. 333-16073) on Form 
S-8 of Sizeler Property Investors, Inc. of our report dated January 30, 1997, 
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Sizeler Property Investors, Inc. 
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 and the related consolidated 
statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years
in the two-year period then ended, and the related financial statement
schedules, which report appears in the December 31, 1996 annual report on Form
10-K of Sizeler Property Investors, Inc.

                                                      /S/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
                                                      -------------------------
                                                        KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


New Orleans, Louisiana
March 26, 1997
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 84 

To establish a penalty for the Department of Housing and Urban Development for failure to enforce compliance with the public housing community 

service and self-sufficiency requirement under law, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. BIGGS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on Appropriations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each 

case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 

the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To establish a penalty for the Department of Housing and 

Urban Development for failure to enforce compliance 

with the public housing community service and self-sufficiency requirement under law, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Free Rent for Free5 loaders Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 84 IH

1 SEC. 2. MONITORING COMPLIANCE. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Inspector General of the De3 partment of Housing and Urban Development shall, on 

4 an annual basis and for each public housing agency (as 

5 such term is defined in section 3(b) of the United States 

6 Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437a(b)))— 

7 (1) monitor the extent of noncompliance with 

8 the requirements under section 12(c) of such Act 

9 (42 U.S.C. 1437j(c)); and 

10 (2) determine the aggregate amount provided in 

11 Federal subsidies for all public housing dwelling 

12 units that were occupied by tenants who were not in 

13 compliance with such requirements. 

14 (b) PUBLICATION.—Not later than September 30 of 

15 each fiscal year, the Inspector General of the Department 

16 of Housing and Urban Development shall cause to be pub17 lished in the Federal Register a statement of the amount 

18 determined for such fiscal year pursuant to subsection 

19 (a)(2). 

20 SEC. 3. RESCISSION OF AMOUNTS FROM HUD MANAGE21 MENT AND ADMINISTRATION ACCOUNT. 

22 (a) IN GENERAL.—In each fiscal year, on October 15 

23 or the date specified in subsection (b), whichever occurs 

24 later, there is rescinded, from amounts made available for 

25 such fiscal year for the Management and Administration 

26 account of the Department of Housing and Urban DevelVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:01 Jan 09, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H84.IH H84

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 84 IH

1 opment, an amount equal to the amount published pursu2 ant to section 2(b) for the preceding fiscal year. 

3 (b) LATE APPROPRIATIONS.—In the case of any fis4 cal year for which a general appropriation Act for the De5 partment of Housing and Urban Development that pro6 vides funds for the Management and Administration ac7 count of such Department has not been enacted before Oc8 tober 15, the date specified in this subsection shall be the 

9 date of the enactment of such a general appropriation Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### J. W. Beach v. Boulevard Apartments, Inc.

154 So. 165.

Division B.

Decision Filed March 17, 1934.

*W. B. Dickenson,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Henry H. Cole,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

— Writ of error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Hillsborough County entered pursuant to default after demurrers to pleas, sustained.

Affirmed without opinion.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Carlos Antonio BLANCO-ESTRADA, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40605 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 20, 2018

• Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Carlos Antonio Blanco-Estrada, Pro Se

■Before REAVLEY, CLEMENT, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Carlos Antonio Rlanco-Estra-da. has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Blanco-Estrada has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo-lous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2. '

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cm. R, 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
# Europos Sąjungos C 179A/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0960 |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | C 179A |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Informacija ir pranešimai | 61 metai2018m. gegužės 25d. |

ISSN 1977-0960

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

C 179A

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Informacija ir pranešimai

61 metai2018m. gegužės 25d.

---

| Turinys | Puslapis |
| --- | --- |
| | Klaidų ištaisymas |
| 2018/C 179 A/01 | Skelbimo dėl rengiamos atrankos Nr. PE/197/S klaidų ištaisymas ( OL C 144 A, 2018 4 25 ) | 1 |

Turinys

Puslapis

Klaidų ištaisymas

2018/C 179 A/01

Skelbimo dėl rengiamos atrankos Nr. PE/197/S klaidų ištaisymas ( OL C 144 A, 2018 4 25 )

( OL C 144 A, 2018 4 25 )

1

---

| LT | |
| --- | --- |

LT

---

Klaidų ištaisymas

| 25.5.2018 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | CA 179/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2018

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

CA 179/1

---

Skelbimo dėl rengiamos atrankos Nr. PE/197/S klaidų ištaisymas

(
  Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys C 144 A, 2018 m. balandžio 25 d.
  )

(2018/C 179 A/01)

1 puslapis:

yra:

„Europos Parlamentas organizuoja atrankos pagal kvalifikaciją ir egzaminų rezultatus procedūrą siekdamas sudaryti tinkamų kandidatų sąrašą, kad galėtų užpildyti vienuolika darbo vietų:“,

turi būti:

turi būti:

„Europos Parlamentas organizuoja atrankos pagal kvalifikaciją ir egzaminų rezultatus procedūrą siekdamas sudaryti tinkamų kandidatų sąrašą, kad galėtų užpildyti darbo vietas:“.

2 puslapis, A skirsnio 1 dalies „Bendrosios aplinkybės“ pirma pastraipa:

2 puslapis, A skirsnio 1 dalies „Bendrosios aplinkybės“ pirma pastraipa:

yra:

yra:

„Europos Parlamentas nusprendė pradėti atrankos į vienuolika laikinojo tarnautojo (1) (AST 3 lygio) – Apsaugos ir saugumo generalinio direktorato Fizinės apsaugos ir pagalbos, apsaugos ir saugumo direktorato asmens sargybinio – darbo vietų procedūrą.“,

turi būti:

turi būti:

„Europos Parlamentas nusprendė pradėti atrankos į laikinojo tarnautojo (1) (AST 3 lygio) – Apsaugos ir saugumo generalinio direktorato Fizinės apsaugos ir pagalbos, apsaugos ir saugumo direktorato asmens sargybinio – darbo vietas procedūrą.“

---

(1)  Visos šio skelbimo nuorodos į vyriškos lyties asmenį taip pat taikomos moteriškos lyties asmeniui ir atvirkščiai.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Telestone Technologies Corp.
(the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date here of (the Report). I, Liu
Dongping, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


By: /s/ Liu Dongping
-----------------------
Liu Dongping
Chief Financial Officer
November 15, 2004
p130223.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0223

Focus Ready Draft 2/4/2013

ENGINEER: Hall \ REC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 1

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 6
p130223.eng

 

 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3D

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

 

(consistent with this IRER).

Page 2

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 6
EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 6
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 6
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 6
p130223.eng

RELEASE TOTAL

9.6E+2 kg/yr - all sites

 

 

 

 

Page 6

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 6
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         887,045
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,076,144
<ALLOWANCES>                                    71,454
<INVENTORY>                                    903,082
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,176,393
<PP&E>                                       1,841,700
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,588,739)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,429,354
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,640,927
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       287,022
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,755,271
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,788,427
<SALES>                                      1,539,331
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,539,331
<CGS>                                          809,211
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,416,337
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,030
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  72
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                135,381
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,360
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            125,021
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   125,021
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
### Martin, Michael (OST) From: Sent: Tom Heanue <tom.heanue@flypib.com> Tuesday, May 13, 2014 2:28 PM To: Martin, Michael (OST) Subject: Request for Extension
Hi Michael, Great talking with youtoday. I appreciate your insight into the matter ofan extension for ADI. Hattiesburg-Laurel Regional Airport does not believe an extension for ADI is deserved based ontheir lack of FAA approval, no code share and no gate at a hub. We feel that this is a remake ofthe SilverAirways proposal of2012, and we all know howthat turned out. However, we do understand inthe fairness ofequality to bidders, that ifwe should deny ADI and accept another bidder's request for an extension, howthat could affect the process. Saying all that, we respect the decision ofyour office to do what is perceived as correct. We thank you for your support and assistance.



### Tom Heanue, Executive Director Hattiesburg-Laurel Regional Airpmt (PIB) 1002Terminal Drive Moselle, MS 39459 (601) 545-3111, Ext 11 

### (601) 545-3155

- Fax

1
#### Gurpreet SINGH, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 16-70142

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed December 21, 2017

Gurpreet Singh, Pro Se

OIL, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Gurpreet Singh, a natiye and citizen of India, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying Singh’s motion to reconsider his claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the agency’s denial of a motion for reconsideration. *Cano-Merida v. INS,*311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir. 2002). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider the well-founded fear contentions that Singh failed to raise before the BIA. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Singh’s motion to reconsider his claims because he failed to identify a legal or factual error in the BIA’s prior decision. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1) (a motion to reconsider must identify errors of fact or law in a prior decision); *Ma v. Ashcroft,*361 F.3d 553, 558 (9th Cir. 2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3,