alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(logo) Grant Thornton

 

 

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

 

Board of Directors

 

Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc.

Audit – Tax – Advisory Grant Thornton LLP

1201 Walnut Street

Suite 2200

Kansas City, MO 64106

 

T 816.412.2400

F 704.334.7701

www.GrantThornton.com

 

 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria (“Management’s Report”), that Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc. (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, except for those criteria noted as not applicable (N/A) within Exhibit A. The transactions covered by this report are only those transactions processed by the Company in its capacity as subservicer for the asset backed securities transactions (the “Platform”). Reference Exhibit B for the transactions covered by this examination. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities constituting the Platform and evaluating whether the Company performed servicing activities related to those transactions and securities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the period covered by this report. Accordingly, our testing may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction or security constituting the Platform. Further, our examination was not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Company’s servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc. complied with the applicable servicing criteria identified in Exhibit A and Exhibit B as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

Grant Thornton

 

Kansas City, MO 

February 29, 2016
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 866 

AN ACT 

To provide a lactation room in public buildings. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 866 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fairness For 

3 Breastfeeding Mothers Act of 2019’’. 

4 SEC. 2. LACTATION ROOM IN PUBLIC BUILDINGS. 

5 (a) LACTATION ROOM IN PUBLIC BUILDINGS.— 

6 Chapter 33 of title 40, United States Code, is amended 

7 by adding at the end the following new section: 

8 ‘‘§ 3318. Lactation room in public buildings 

9 ‘‘(a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

10 ‘‘(1) APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY.—The term ‘ap11 propriate authority’ means the head of a Federal 

12 agency, the Architect of the Capitol, or other official 

13 authority responsible for the operation of a public 

14 building. 

15 ‘‘(2) COVERED PUBLIC BUILDING.—The term 

16 ‘covered public building’ means a public building (as 

17 defined in section 3301) that is open to the public 

18 and contains a public restroom, and includes a build19 ing listed in section 6301 or 5101. 

20 ‘‘(3) LACTATION ROOM.—The term ‘lactation 

21 room’ means a hygienic place, other than a bath22 room, that— 

23 ‘‘(A) is shielded from view; 

24 ‘‘(B) is free from intrusion; and 
3 

•HR 866 EH

1 ‘‘(C) contains a chair, a working surface, 

2 and, if the public building is otherwise supplied 

3 with electricity, an electrical outlet. 

4 ‘‘(b) LACTATION ROOM REQUIRED.—Except as pro5 vided in subsection (c), the appropriate authority of a cov6 ered public building shall ensure that the building contains 

7 a lactation room that is made available for use by mem8 bers of the public to express breast milk. 

9 ‘‘(c) EXCEPTIONS.—A covered public building may be 

10 excluded from the requirement in subsection (b) at the dis11 cretion of the appropriate authority if— 

12 ‘‘(1) the public building— 

13 ‘‘(A) does not contain a lactation room for 

14 employees who work in the building; and 

15 ‘‘(B) does not have a room that could be 

16 repurposed as a lactation room or a space that 

17 could be made private using portable materials, 

18 at a reasonable cost; or 

19 ‘‘(2) new construction would be required to cre20 ate a lactation room in the public building and the 

21 cost of such construction is unfeasible. 

22 ‘‘(d) NO UNAUTHORIZED ENTRY.—Nothing in this 

23 section shall be construed to authorize an individual to 

24 enter a public building or portion thereof that the indi25 vidual is not otherwise authorized to enter.’’. 
4 

•HR 866 EH

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

2 at the beginning of chapter 33 of title 40, United States 

3 Code, is amended by inserting after the item related to 

4 section 3316 the following new item: 

‘‘3318. Lactation room in public buildings.’’. 

5 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

6 this section shall take effect 1 year after the date of the 

7 enactment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 6, 

2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 866 

AN ACT 

To provide a lactation room in public buildings.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 43 (Wednesday, March 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10032-10033]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5325]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket Nos. RP97-227-001 and TM97-2-49-002]


 Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

February 27, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 24, 1997, Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), tendered for filing as part of its 
FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1 and Original Volume No. 2, 
the following tariff sheets, with an effective date of January 1, 1997:

Second Revised Volume No. 1

1st Rev Sub 20th Revised Sheet No. 15
1st Rev Sub 23rd Revised Sheet No. 16
1st Rev Sub 20th Revised Sheet No. 18
1st Rev Sub 17th Revised Sheet No. 21

Original Volume No. 2

1st Rev Sub 64th Revised Sheet No. 11B

    Williston Basin states that on January 14, 1997, it filed tariff 
sheets in Docket Nos. RP96-93-000 and TM97-2-49-000 to reflect the 
elimination of the Docket No. RP96-93-000 Take-or-Pay Throughput 
Surcharge, effective January 1, 1997.
    On February 12, 1997, the OPR--Rate Review Branch I issued a Letter 
Order in Docket Nos. RP97-227-000 and TM97-2-49-000, which accepted the 
filed tariff sheets to be effective as proposed but ordered that 
Williston Basin correct the tariff sheet pagination on the January 1, 
1997 tariff sheets. Williston Basin filed the above tariff sheets in 
compliance with that Order.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are

[[Page 10033]]

available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-5325 Filed 3-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

                    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of Information Office at                     *https://www.federalreserve.gov/​foia/​request.htm.*                     Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).                

Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than May 6, 2022.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis*                     (Holly A. Rieser, Manager) P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034. Comments can also be sent electronically to                     *Comments.applications@stls.frb.org:*

                    1.                     *FMB Bancshares, Inc., Baldwyn, Mississippi;*                     to become a bank holding company by acquiring Farmers & Merchants Bank, Baldwyn, Mississippi.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 1, 2022.

Ann E. Misback,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2022-07235 Filed 4-5-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Submitted September 2,

reversed November 9, 2016

#### In the Matter of C’W. L. H., a Child. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, *Petitioner-Respondent, v.*P. R. H., *Appellant.*

Jackson County Circuit Court

15JU01905; A161980

384 P3d 172

Shannon Storey, Chief Defender, Juvenile Appellate Section, and Sarah Peterson, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Cecil A. Reniche-Smith, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Judge, and Lagesen, Judge.

*202PER CURIAM

Father appeals a judgment asserting jurisdiction over his daughter, arguing, in part, that the Department of Human Services (DHS) failed to prove, by clear and convincing evidence under the Indian Child Welfare Act, that any risk of harm to the child was current at the time of the jurisdictional hearing. The juvenile court took jurisdiction over the child based on allegations that mother and father failed to maintain a safe environment for the child because they exposed her to the production or manufacture of byproducts of marijuana, and an allegation that another child suffered a serious nonaccidental injury while in father’s care. The court concluded that DHS failed to prove an allegation against mother related to the serious nonaccidental injury of the “other child,” concluding that father had caused the injuries and mother had responded appropriately upon learning of the injuries.

DHS concedes on appeal that the record below is insufficient to prove that, at the time of the jurisdictional hearing, parents’ past involvement in the “production or manufacture of byproducts of marijuana” created a *current*risk of harm to the child’s welfare. DHS also concedes that, because the juvenile court dismissed the “only other allegation related to mother’s ability to safely parent [the child],” we must reverse the juvenile court’s judgment. *See Dept. of Human Services v. W. A. C.,*263 Or App 382, 392, 328 P3d 769 (2014) (concluding that juvenile court jurisdiction is not warranted if a child has a parent who appears in the proceeding and is capable of caring for the child safely).

We agree with and accept DHS’s concession. Accordingly, we reverse the jurisdictional judgment.

Reversed.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Paul C. Honda, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports
on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Honda Auto Receivables 2014-4
Owner Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange
Act periodic reports;



4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by
the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required
in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and



5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have
reasonably relied on information provided to me by the unaffiliated party Citibank, N.A.







Date: June 10, 2015







|/s/ Paul C. Honda                                    | 
|---------------------------------------------------- | 
|Paul C. Honda                                        | 
|Vice President and Assistant Secretary               | 
|of American Honda Finance Corporation                | 
|(senior officer in charge of the servicing function) |
|    |                                                                                                                   |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                      |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                                             |
|---------------------------------------------|
|                                             |  |  |  |
| /S/    MALON WILKUS     |   |
| Name:                                       |    | Malon Wilkus |   |
| Title:                                      |    | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |   |
| Date:                                       |    | August 10, 2015 |   |
|                                        |   |
| /S/    JOHN R. ERICKSON |   |
| Name:                                       |    | John R. Erickson |   |
| Title:                                      |    | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |   |
| Date:                                       |    | August 10, 2015 |   |
# C_2021431EN.01005201.xml

| 25.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 431/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/52

---

Action brought on 6 September 2021 — Worldwide Brands v EUIPO — Guangyu Wan (CAMEL)

(Case T-552/21)

(2021/C 431/61)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Worldwide Brands, Inc. Zweigniederlassung Deutschland (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: R. Ahijón Lana and J. Gracia Albero, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Eric Guangyu Wan (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark CAMEL — European Union trade mark No 1 015 593

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 July 2021 in Case R 1548/2020-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | partially annul the contested decision to the extent that it upheld the appeal filed by the intervener and rejected the application for a declaration for revocation in relation to ‘shirts’; |
| --- | --- |

—

partially annul the contested decision to the extent that it upheld the appeal filed by the intervener and rejected the application for a declaration for revocation in relation to ‘shirts’;

| — | order EUIPO to bear the costs of the present proceedings, including the costs deriving from the proceedings before the Cancellation Division and the First Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to bear the costs of the present proceedings, including the costs deriving from the proceedings before the Cancellation Division and the First Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in conjunction with Article 27(4) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in conjunction with Article 27(4) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;

| — | Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
No. 11-9932.

#### Coleman *v.*Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
1,135

0

796

1,931

BallotsCounted

22

73

0

95

BallotsRejected

NEBRASKA

Mail,Fax,Email

Election/Registrar's

Office

Internet

DM

V

Public

Assistance

Office

DisabilitiesAgency

Military

RecruitmentOffice

OtherState

Agency

RegistrationDrives

Registration:Other

189,109

149,494

368,502

27,902

61,601

1,094 1,217 137 0 0

RegistrationFormSource

TotalRegisteredVoters

1,211,101

SectionA-VoterRegistration

RegistrationFormsReceived

799,056

ConfirmationNotificationsSent

150,449

Polling

Place

UOCAVA Absentee Provisional

Ballot

EarlyVote

Center

Voteby

Mail

Turnout:

Other

612,917

226,409

2,026 16,212 0 12,138 113

SectionF-TurnoutbyMethod

CountedFull Counted

Part

Rejected Provisional:

Other

12,350

3,860

0 2

SectionE-ProvisionalBallots

UniformedService

Non-militaryOverseas

Other

SectionB-UOCAVA

1,065

1,421

0

2,486

BallotsTransmitted

TOTAL TOTAL

ProvisionalBallotTotal:16,212 TurnoutTotal:869,815

Select: NEBRASKA

TOTAL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                          

  

2016EAVSDataBrief 

U i
#### COM. v. CASSA, A.

1629 WDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/18/2017

CP-65-SA-0000254-2016 (Westmore-land)

Affirmed
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 11, 2009 

s0831 

Order 

 

September 11, 2009 

138847 & (20) 

ESTATE OF PAMELA ANN PONTE, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138847 

 COA: 290010 

Washtenaw CC: 04-002966-DM 

ROBERT FRANCIS PONTE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On the order of the Court, the motion for substitution of parties is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the February 4, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented 

should be reviewed by this Court.