alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of closed meeting of Art Advisory Panel.

# SUMMARY:

                        Closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held virtually by                         *ZoomGov*.                    

# DATES:

The meeting will be held April 27, 2022.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held virtually by                         *ZoomGov.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robin B. Lawhorn, 400 West Bay Street, Suite 252, Jacksonville, FL 32202. Telephone (904) 661-3198 (not a toll free number).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App., that a closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held virtually by                     *ZoomGov*.                

The agenda will consist of the review and evaluation of the acceptability of fair market value appraisals of works of art involved in Federal income, estate, or gift tax returns. This will involve the discussion of material in individual tax returns made confidential by the provisions of 26 U.S.C. 6103.

A determination as required by section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act has been made that this meeting is concerned with matters listed in sections 552b(c)(3), (4), (6), and (7), of the Government in the Sunshine Act, and that the meeting will not be open to the public.

Andrew J. Keyso Jr.,

Chief, Independent Office of Appeals.

[FR Doc. 2022-07456 Filed 4-7-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          43,441                   3,050
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,379                  23,129
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (663)                   (310)
<INVENTORY>                                        567                     400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                80,007                  27,304
<PP&E>                                          16,563                   9,212
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,993                   4,235
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 105,812                  48,030
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,713                  19,404
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          3                       0
<COMMON>                                            17                       3
<OTHER-SE>                                      71,911                   4,475
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   105,812                  48,030
<SALES>                                        109,237                  72,433
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               109,237                  72,433
<CGS>                                           72,063                  55,790
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   88,435                  66,964
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (408)                   (137)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   802                     443
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,779                   1,260
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,431                   4,346
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,462                   1,036
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,969                   3,309
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,969                   3,309
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.94                    0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.94                    0.23


</TABLE>
Proposed Rule: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas EmissionsMeeting Documentation: Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA)DateStaff Contact Information(Name, email, phone #)Name of Organization(Attach list of allattendees names andemails if possible)Summary of Discussion(e.g., applicability,reporting requirements, etc.)WrittenCommentsProvided?Did they alsosubmit toDocket?Date sent toEPA- CCDJune 10, 2010Kirsten Cappel(202) 343-9556cappel.kirsten@epa.gov• Outside participantsidentified below.• EPA Climate ChangeDivision and EPAcontractors: KirstenCappel, EPA; ScottBartos, EPA; DebHarris, ICFInternational; ShepBurton, ICFInternational.Participants presented information andconclusions from an uncertaintyanalysis conduced by ISMI.PowerPoint presentations provided atmeetings are included in SIAcomments on the proposed rule(Attachment B1)SIA submittedcomments tothe docket.Outside Participants:Cynthia Johnson, TI, ckjohnson@TI.com.Tom Diamond, SIA, tdiamond@sia-online.org.Matthew Brewer, Latham and Watkins, matthew.brewer@lw.comOn the telephone: Laura Mendicino, Freescale, laura.mendicino@freescale.com; Laurie Beu, Consultant to ISMI,laurie.beu@ismi.sematech.org ; Diane Michelson, ISMI, Di.Michelson@exchange.sematech.org; Steve Trammell, ISMI,steve.trammell@ismi.sematech.org; Dave Speed, IBM, speed@us.ibm.com; Jay Dietrich, IBM, jdietric@us.ibm.com; Tim Higgs,Intel, tim.g.higgs@intel.com; Tina Gilliland, TI.1
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE:

SMITH INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

RELATOR.

§

§

§

§

§

 § 

No. 08-11-00007-CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN 

MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is an unopposed motion to dismiss this original proceeding. 

The motion is granted, and the proceeding is dismissed. Our previous order staying the trial is

vacated, and the motion for extension of time to respond to the mandamus petition is denied as

moot.

April 13, 2011

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY SUCH 
FILING.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                              35
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,280
<ALLOWANCES>                                        63
<INVENTORY>                                      3,887
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,421
<PP&E>                                           4,875
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,529
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,077
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,712
<BONDS>                                          6,774
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                            84
<OTHER-SE>                                         507
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,077
<SALES>                                          4,624
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,939
<CGS>                                            2,729
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,729
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,565
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 352
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,707)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,707)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.20)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 42 (Tuesday, March 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 9818]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5441]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

DATE: Weeks of March 3, 10, 17, and 24, 1997.

PLACE: Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Public and Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Week of March 3

    There are no meetings scheduled for the Week of March 3.

Week of March 10--Tentative

Monday, March 10
10:30 a.m.  Briefing on 10 CFR 50.59 Regulatory Process Improvements 
(PUBLIC MEETING) (Contact: Eileen McKenna, 301-415-2189)
2:30 p.m.  Briefing on Implementation of Maintenance Rule, Revised 
Regulatory Guide, and Consequences (PUBLIC MEETING) (Contact: Suzanne 
Black, 301-415-1017)
Thursday, March 13
11:30 a.m.  Affirmation Session (PUBLIC MEETING) (if needed)

Week of March 17--Tentative

    There are no meetings scheduled for the Week of March 17.

Week of March 24--Tentative

Tuesday, March 25
10:00 a.m.  Briefing on High-Burnup Fuel Issues (PUBLIC MEETING) 
(Contact: Ralph O. Meyer, 301-415-6789)
11:30 a.m.  Affirmation Session (PUBLIC MEETING) (if needed)

    Note: The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change 
on short notice. To verify the status of meetings call (recording)--
(301) 451-1292.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Bill Hill (301) 415-1661.
    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet 
at: http://www.nrc.gov/SECY/smj/schedule.htm.
    This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred subscribers; 
if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to it, 
please contact the Office of the Secretary, Attn: Operations Branch, 
Washington, D.C. 20555 (301-415-1661).
    In addition, distribution of this meeting notice over the internet 
system is available. If you are interested in receiving this Commission 
meeting schedule electronically, please send an electronic message to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f98e9491b9978b9ad79e968f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b5c2d8ddf5dbc7d69bd2dac3">[email protected]</span></a> or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5c38372b1c322e3f723b332a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f5919e82b59b8796db929a83">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: February 28, 1997.
William M. Hill, Jr.,
SECY Tracking Officer, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-5441 Filed 2-28-97; 2:43 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/d07b1474/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of JB Oxford Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christopher L. Jarratt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/  Christopher L. Jarratt
Chief Executive Officer
August 13, 2004
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

jlf/Inventory

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROXANA MARIBEL NOLASCOALVAREZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-74114

Agency No. A098-559-156

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 11, 2010 ** 

Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Roxana Maribel Nolasco-Alvarez, a native and citizen of El Salvador,

petitions for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissal of her

FILED

JAN 19 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
jlf/Inventory 2 08-74114

appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of her applications for withholding of

removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). The BIA noted

that petitioner was not eligible for asylum based on her failure to file a timely

asylum application. The BIA denied petitioner’s applications for withholding of

removal and CAT based on her failure to establish persecution or the likelihood of

torture in El Salvador.

Petitioner contends that the BIA erred by denying her application for asylum

based on her failure to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future

persecution. Petitioner alleged fear of gang activity in El Salvador. 

Petitioner does not challenge the BIA’s holding that she had failed to file a

timely asylum application, or that an exception to the timeliness requirement

applied, and therefore petitioner has waived any arguments concerning whether she

merited asylum relief. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir.

1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are

waived). Petitioner raises no issues before this court concerning the BIA’s denial

of her applications for withholding of removal or relief under the Convention

Against Torture. Petitioner, therefore, fails to raise any issues properly before this

court.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-30767

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JEFFERY DEGREE,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 99-CR-351-4-J

- - - - - - - - - -

April 11, 2002

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Robert F. Fleming, Jr., court-appointed counsel for Jeffery

Degree, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Degree

has not filed a response. 

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses

no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
# Biological Threat Reduction Program BTRP 

/ Published Aug. 1, 2023
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarter report on Form 10-Q of National Housing Trust Limited Partnership (the
Partnership) for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Susan E. Basting, Chief Financial Officer of NHT, Inc., general partner of the
Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |    |  |                                           
|--------------------- |  | -- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: August 22, 2007 |  | By |  | /s/ Susan E. Basting                      
|                      |  |    |  | Susan E. Basting,                         
|                      |  |    |  | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer     
|                      |  |    |  | NHT, Inc., General Partner for            
|                      |  |    |  | National Housing Trust Limited Partnership
# C_2021263EN.01003001.xml

| 5.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/30

---

Action brought on 17 May 2021 — Établissement Amra v EUIPO — eXpresio (Shape of a rebound shoe with the word elements ‘Aerower Jumper1 M’)

(Case T-264/21)

(2021/C 263/40)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Établissement Amra (Vaduz, Liechtenstein) (represented by: M. Gómez Calvo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: eXpresio, estudio creativo, SL (La Nucía, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union three-dimensional mark (Shape of a rebound shoe with the word elements ‘Aerower Jumper1 M’) — European Union trade mark No 17 417 015

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 March 2021 in Case R 1083/2020-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of the principles of equal treatment and sound administration; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the principles of equal treatment and sound administration;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(a), (b) and (e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(a), (b) and (e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

THADDEUS PRYOR
, Appellant,

v.

THE CADLE COMPANY
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 1317

[ October 3, 2019 ]

Appeal of non

- final order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Scott Kerner , Judge; L.T. Case No.
502017CA009862

.

Paul K. Silverberg and Kraig S. Weiss of Silverberg & Weiss, P.A., Weston, for appellant.

Riley W. Cirul n ick of Rice Pugatch Robinson Storfer & Cohen, PLLC, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS
, T AYLOR and F ORST
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.4

        STATEMENT UNDER OATH OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL
         FINANCIAL OFFICER REGARDING FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES RELATING TO
                              EXCHANGE ACT FILINGS


I, Robert A. Peiser, Chief Executive Officer of Imperial Sugar Company, state
and attest that:

(1)  To the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the covered reports of
     Imperial Sugar Company, and, except as corrected or supplemented in a
     subsequent covered report:

     o    no covered report contained an untrue statement of a material fact as
          of the end of the period covered by such report (or in the case of a
          report on Form 8-K or definitive proxy materials, as of the date on
          which it was filed); and

     o    no covered report omitted to state a material fact necessary to make
          the statements in the covered report, in light of the circumstances
          under which they were made, not misleading as of the end of the period
          covered by such report (or in the case of a report on Form 8-K or
          definitive proxy materials, as of the date on which it was filed).

(2)  I have reviewed the contents of this statement with the Company's audit
     committee.

(3)  In this statement under oath, each of the following, if filed on or before
     the date of this statement, is a "covered report":

     o    September 30, 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the
          Commission of Imperial Sugar Company;

     o    all reports on Form 10-Q, all reports on Form 8-K and all definitive
          proxy materials of Imperial Sugar Company filed with the Commission
          subsequent to the filing of the Form 10-K identified above; and

     o    any amendments to any of the foregoing.



                                                    Subscribed and sworn to
                                                    before me this 13th day of
/s/ Robert A. Peiser                                August 2002.
--------------------
Robert A. Peiser                                         /s/Susan DiMucci
President and Chief Executive Officer                    --------------------
August 13, 2002                                          Notary Public
                                                         My Commission Expires:
                                                            May 31, 2003
No. 11-10187.

#### Smith *v.*McDaniel, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.