alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 868 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 868

 To repeal the restriction on the use of funds by the Internal Revenue 
  Service to bring transparency to the political activity of certain 
                        nonprofit organizations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2019

Mr. Crow (for himself and Mr. Sarbanes) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal the restriction on the use of funds by the Internal Revenue 
  Service to bring transparency to the political activity of certain 
                        nonprofit organizations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``End Dark Money Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF RESTRICTION OF USE OF FUNDS BY INTERNAL REVENUE 
              SERVICE TO BRING TRANSPARENCY TO POLITICAL ACTIVITY OF 
              CERTAIN NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

    Notwithstanding section 101 of division C of Public Law 115-245, 
section 125 of Division E of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018 
shall have no force or effect during fiscal year 2019.
                                 <all>
```
DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY 

8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN ROAD, STOP 6201 

FORT BELVOIR, VA 22060-620 I 

Christine Monahan 

American Oversight 

1030 15th Street NW, Suite B255 

Washington, DC 20005 

Re: FOIA Case No.: 21-004 

Dear Ms. Monahan: 

March 9, 2022 

This is our final response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request perfected 

on October 15, 2020, and assigned FOIA case number 21-004 by the Defense Threat Reduction 

Agency (DTRA). You requested any interim assessments, reports, or projections provided by or 

on behalf of Advanced Technology International, Inc. (ATI), or any of ATI' s subcontractors or -

grantees, regarding the development and future distribution and administration of any COVID-19 

vaccines or therapeutics. 

No records responsive to your request were identified during a thorough search of agency 

files and electronic records. The department has no contracts, agreements, grants, etc. with any 

of the companies you listed. No fees are due as the assessable costs total $25.00 or less. 

Determinations on behalf ofDTRA were made by the Initial Denial Authority (IDA), Mr. 

Earl E. Washington, Jr., Chief, Records Management, FOIA, and Privacy Act Division, 

Infonnation Management and Technology Directorate. If you consider this decision to be an 

adverse determination, you may file a written appeal that is postmarked no later than 90 calendar 

days after the date of this letter to the Deputy Director, Defense Threat Reduction Agency, 

Infonnation Management and Technology Directorate, ATTN: FOWPA Office, 8725 John J. 

Kingman Road, MSC 6201, Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060. The appeal should reference the 

FOIA/Privacy Act case number, contain a concise statement of the grounds upon which the 

appeal is brought, and a description of the relief sought. A copy of this letter should also 

accompany your appeal. Both the envelope and your letter should clearly identify that a Freedom 

of Infonnation Act and/or a Privacy Act Appeal is being made. 
Should you have additional questions or concerns regarding this case, you may seek 

dispute resolution services from the DTRA FOIA Public Liaison or the Office of Government 

Infonnation Services (OGIS). The DTRA FOIA Public Liaison, Mr. Mario Vizcarra, may be 

contacted by phone at (703)767-1792 or by email at dtrafoiaprivacy@mail.mil. The contact 

information for OGIS can be found at www.archives.gov/ogis. 

Sincerely, 

Eugene McGirt 

FOIAfPrivacy Act Specialist 

Freedom of Information/Privacy Act Office
#### IN the INTEREST OF: J.S., a Minor

512 EDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

9/21/2017

CP-51-DP-0002472-2014

(Philadelphia)

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ITEM 1 OF
FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      15,104,118
<SECURITIES>                                23,453,076
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,295,509
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            40,182,267
<PP&E>                                      10,816,042
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,835,628
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              46,461,290
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,120,418
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        56,686
<OTHER-SE>                                  43,284,186
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                46,461,290
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,590,567
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,457,833
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,867,266)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,867,266)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,867,266)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.31)
        

</TABLE>
No. 11-8278.

#### Baskerville *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         479,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,261,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     58,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,903,000
<PP&E>                                         523,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,390,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,602,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  9,717,000
<COMMON>                                    13,576,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (17,184,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,390,000
<SALES>                                      3,455,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,455,000
<CGS>                                        1,108,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,060,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             175,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                116,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            116,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   116,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Cabinet Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,
2005 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date:  May 12, 2005
504

0

42

546

BallotsCounted

0

9

0

9

BallotsRejected

HAWAII

Mail,Fax,Email

Election/Registrar's

Office

Internet

DM

V

Public

Assistance

Office

DisabilitiesAgency

Military

RecruitmentOffice

OtherState

Agency

RegistrationDrives

Registration:Other

55,90452,189

72,992

6,646

0 0 142 2,288 0 0

RegistrationFormSource

TotalRegisteredVoters

751,483

SectionA-VoterRegistration

RegistrationFormsReceived

223,251

ConfirmationNotificationsSent

41,120

Polling

Place

UOCAVA Absentee Provisional

Ballot

EarlyVote

Center

Voteby

Mail

Turnout:

Other

203,350

187,389

39,009

259 9 0 0

SectionF-TurnoutbyMethod

CountedFull Counted

Part

Rejected Provisional:

Other

114

711

0 0

SectionE-ProvisionalBallots

UniformedService

Non-militaryOverseas

Other

SectionB-UOCAVA

87

682

0

769

BallotsTransmitted

TOTAL TOTAL

ProvisionalBallotTotal:845 TurnoutTotal:437,697

Select: HAWAII

TOTAL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                          

  

2016EAVSDataBrief 

U i
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8493 

To amend the Passport Act of 1920 to exempt from the collection of certain 

passport fees an individual who was awarded the Purple Heart, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 1, 2020 

Mr. RYAN (for himself and Mr. RESCHENTHALER) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Passport Act of 1920 to exempt from the 

collection of certain passport fees an individual who was 

awarded the Purple Heart, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Passports for Purple 

5 Hearts Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8493 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM CERTAIN PASSPORT FEES OF AN 

2 INDIVIDUAL WHO WAS AWARDED THE PUR3 PLE HEART. 

4 Section 1 of the Act of June 1, 1920 (22 U.S.C. 214; 

5 commonly referred to as the ‘‘Passport Act of 1920’’), is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (a), in the third sentence, by 

8 inserting ‘‘from an individual who was awarded the 

9 Purple Heart;’’ before ‘‘or from an individual or in10 dividuals abroad’’; and 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub12 section: 

13 ‘‘(c) In this section, the term ‘passport’ includes a 

14 passport card.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
U.S. ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION

1225 New York Ave. NW – Suite 1100 

Washington, DC 20005

January 18, 2005 

 

EAC Advisory 05-001 - Use of funds provided by counties as part of the 

State’s matching funding under Title II of HAVA

Question: Can county governments appropriate and maintain the funding that a 

state intends to appropriate as its matching funding pursuant to section 253(b)(5) of 

the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA)? 

Response: A State may use funds that are set aside by county or local governments 

and maintained under the control of those governments as their matching funds for 

purposes of receiving Requirements Payments. However, there are several 

stipulations to that authority: 

1. In order for the money to be under the control of the State, there must be some 

written agreement between the counties and the State establishing that the funds 

have been set aside by the counties for use by the State for this purpose and that 

the only purposes for which those funds may be used are those provided by HAVA 

for the use of matching funds. A cooperative agreement, memorandum of 

understanding or other contract would be sufficient to satisfy the requirement of a 

written agreement. 

2. Maintenance of funds at the county level does not obviate in any way the State’s 

obligation to provide the matching funds, account for their use, report on their use, 

and audit those funds as required by HAVA and OMB Circulars A-87 and A-133. 

3. The provision and maintenance of matching funds by the counties does not 

alleviate the State’s obligation to use all HAVA funding in keeping with the tenets 

and spirit of the Voting Rights Act and other state and federal laws and regulations 

prohibiting the discriminatory use of federal funds and/or discriminatory 

application of voting systems.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


Press Release

DYNEGY REPORTS S.E.C. DEVELOPMENT

     HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--May 8, 2002--Dynegy Inc. (NYSE:DYN)
today reported that it has been advised by the Staff of the Securities and
Exchange Commission that they intend to request a formal order of investigation
in connection with the previously announced inquiry into the natural gas
transaction called "Project Alpha."

     The company said it intends to continue to cooperate fully with the SEC in
resolving this issue.
# C_2021338EN.01002601.xml

| 23.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/26

---

Action brought on 29 June 2021 — Coinbase v EUIPO — bitFlyer (coinbase)

(Case T-366/21)

(2021/C 338/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Coinbase, Inc. (San Francisco, California, United States) (represented by: A. Nordemann, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: bitFlyer Inc. (Tokyo, Japan)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the mark coinbase — International registration designating the European Union No 1 308 248

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 April 2021 in Case R 1751/2020-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to bear the costs of the proceedings.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council . |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council .

---
**Exhibit
31.** **2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT**
 
 I,
William J. Bush, certify that:
 
 1.
    I
      have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of International
      Microcomputer Software, Inc;
 
 2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
      make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
      statements were made, not misleading;
 
 3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects
      the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant as of,
      and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;
 
 4.
    The
      registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining internal controls for the registrant and we
      have:
 
 a.
    Designed
      such internal controls to ensure that material information relating to the
      registrant and its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
      others within those entities, particularly during the periods in which
      this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b.
    Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant's internal controls of a date within
      90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation
      Date"); and
 
 c.
    Presented
      in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      internal controls based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
    Date.
 
 5.
    The
      registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
      committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
      equivalent functions):
 
 a.
    All
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
      which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
      summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;
      and
 
 b.
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls.
 
 6.
    The
      registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
      quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
      controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
      controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including
      any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
      material weaknesses.
 
 **Date:
February 14, 2005**
 
 **By:
/s/ William J. Bush**
 William
J. Bush
 Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
  
 33
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1995
<CASH>                                       7,072,000
<SECURITIES>                                 6,558,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,948,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   506,000
<INVENTORY>                                  5,915,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            32,934,000
<PP&E>                                      21,264,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              17,880,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              36,541,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,594,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        71,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,873,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                36,541,000
<SALES>                                     51,286,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            51,286,000
<CGS>                                       26,679,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               26,679,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            21,845,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,245,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    81,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,164,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,164,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .48
        

</TABLE>
No. 11-969.

No. 11-986.

#### Ryan et al. *v.*Picard et al.; and Velvel *v.*Picard et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certio-rari denied. Reported below: 654 F. 3d 229.
# C_2021320EN.01005401.xml

| 9.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/54

---

Action brought on 25 June 2021 — Essity Hygiene and Health v EUIPO (Representation of a leaf)

(Case T-364/21)

(2021/C 320/60)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicant: Essity Hygiene and Health AB (Gothenburg, Sweden) (represented by: U. Wennermark, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for registration of EU figurative mark representing a leaf — Application for registration No 16 709 305

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 31 March 2021 in Case R 2196/2017-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims, primarily, that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in so far as it refuses the application; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in so far as it refuses the application;

| — | vary the contested decision by granting the appeal against the examiner’s decision not to grant the application in respect of the goods in Class 16; and |
| --- | --- |

—

vary the contested decision by granting the appeal against the examiner’s decision not to grant the application in respect of the goods in Class 16; and

| — | order EUIPO to pay the applicant’s costs incurred in the proceedings before both the General Court and EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the applicant’s costs incurred in the proceedings before both the General Court and EUIPO.

The applicant claims, in the alternative, that the Court should:

| — | order EUIPO to pay the applicant’s costs incurred before the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the applicant’s costs incurred before the General Court.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 165(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 and Article 36(1)(g) and 36(2) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 165(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 and Article 36(1)(g) and 36(2) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.

---