alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021242EN.01005401.xml

| 21.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/54

---

Action brought on 3 May 2021 — FZ and Others v Commission

(Case T-236/21)

(2021/C 242/76)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: FZ and 15 other applicants (represented by: J.-N. Louis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | annul the Commission’s decision establishing the applicants’ pay slip for the month of July 2020 in so far as it applies, for the first time, the new correction coefficients applicable to their salary, with retroactive effect from 1 October 2019 and 1 January 2020; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission’s decision establishing the applicants’ pay slip for the month of July 2020 in so far as it applies, for the first time, the new correction coefficients applicable to their salary, with retroactive effect from 1 October 2019 and 1 January 2020;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of their action, the applicants allege infringement of Articles 64 and 65 of the Staff Regulations and of the principle of equal treatment in terms of equivalence of purchasing power, manifest error of assessment and infringement of the principle of legal certainty and of the duty of care.

In order to set the correction coefficient applicable to the salary of the applicants who are posted outside the European Union, Eurostat should collect data specific to their place of employment, in accordance with the rules for the application of Articles 64 and 65 of the Staff Regulations, set out in Annex XI thereto. The collection of the data used to set the correction coefficient is carried out under an international cooperation agreement between Eurostat, the OECD and the UN.

The coefficients set on the basis of those data fell from January 2018 to January 2019 from 239,7 to 94,0 whereas, for that same period, the coefficients applied to the salaries of UN personnel were increased to take account of inflation.

In 2017, the Congolese franc (CDF) underwent a sharp devaluation as against the dollar (USD) and the euro, which, coupled with substantial inflation, resulted in a significant increase in prices in USD, according to the analysis of the IMF. Furthermore, the statistical data of both the Central Bank of Congo and the UN and the IMF, show a parallel trend of the USD and the CDF in relation to the euro.

---
No. 11-9940.

#### Kidd *v.*Livingston, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 4.05
                                                            
     CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED
                         PARTNERSHIP
                             OF
                ENTERGY LONDON CAPITAL, L.P.


          This Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of
Limited Partnership of Entergy London Capital, L.P. (the
"Partnership"), dated as of September __, 1997, is being
duly executed and filed by Entergy London Investments, plc,
a public limited company organized under the laws of England
and Wales, as general partner, in accordance with the
provisions of 6 Del. C.  17-202 and 17-204, to amend the
original Certificate of Limited Partnership of the
Partnership, which was filed on August 4, 1997 (the
"Certificate"), to form a limited partnership under the
Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act (6 Del.C.
17-101, et seq.).

          1.   Name.  The name of the limited partnership is
Entergy London Capital, L.P.

          2.   Amendment.  The Certificate is amended by
changing name of the general partner of the Partnership from
"Entergy Power UK plc" to "Entergy London Investments plc".
The mailing address of the sole general partner of the
Partnership is: Entergy London Investments plc, Templar
House, 81-87 High, Holborn, London WC1V 6NU England.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed
this Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Limited
Partnership as of the date first-above written.

                         ENTERGY LONDON INVESTMENTS plc,
                         as general partner
                         
                         
                         By:  _____________________________
                              Name:
                              Title:
# Student Financial Aid Officers

- Federal Student Aid Office of Enforcement Tip Submission Do you know about illegal acts or other conduct that might violate the Higher Education Act or federal rules for institutions of higher education?We want to hear from you!Email the FSA Office of Enforcement today at FSATips@ed.gov
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 66 (Wednesday, April 6, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 19852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07412]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of Commission public business meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Friday, April 8, 2022, 12 p.m. EST.

ADDRESSES: Meeting to take place virtually and is open to the public 
via livestream on the Commission's YouTube page: https://www.youtube.com/user/USCCR/videos.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angelia Rorison: 202-376-8371; 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1e6e6b7c72777d7f78787f776c6d5e6b6d7d7d6c30797168"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="077772656b6e64666161666e757447727464647529606871">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the Government in 
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), the Commission on Civil Rights is holding 
a meeting to discuss the Commission's business for the month of 
January. This business meeting is open to the public. Computer assisted 
real-time transcription (CART) will be provided. The web link to access 
CART (in English) on Friday, April 8, 2022, is https://www.streamtext.net/player?event=USCCR. Please note that CART is text-
only translation that occurs in real time during the meeting and is not 
an exact transcript.

Meeting Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Business Meeting
    A. Presentations by State Advisory Committee Chairs on Released 
Reports and Memorandums
    B. Discussion and Vote on Advisory Committee Appointments
    C. Discussion on Status of SAC appointments and Committee 
Assignments
    D. Discussion on Status of FY 2023 and 2024 Topics and Committee 
Assignments
    E. Discussion on AI 9-1: Appropriate Uses of Commission Stationery
    F. Management and Operations
    <bullet> Staff Director's Report
III. Adjourn Meeting

    Dated: April 4, 2022.
Angelia Rorison,
USCCR Media and Communications Director.
[FR Doc. 2022-07412 Filed 4-4-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Submitted September 28;

portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay “mandatory state amt” on each, conviction reversed, otherwise affirmed November 2, 2016;

petition for review denied April 27, 2017 (361 Or 439)

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Plaintiff-Respondent, v.*DENNIS BRUCE KNIGHT, *Defendant-Appellant.*

Clackamas County Circuit Court

CR1202050; A158204

383 P3d 1002

Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Shawn E. Wiley, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Susan G. Howe, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Duncan, Presiding Judge, and DeVore, Judge, and Garrett, Judge.

*65PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals after being convicted of various sexual offenses. We reject without discussion all of defendant’s assignments of error, except for his third. In that third assignment, defendant argues that the trial court erred by imposing a “Mandatory State Amt” on each conviction. The state concedes that the trial court did not have authority to impose those separate assessments and that they should be reversed. We agree and accepted the state’s concession. *See State v. Pranzetti,*269 Or App 410, 344 P3d 547 (2015) (explaining that no statute authorized the trial court to impose a “mandatory state amt”).

Portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay “mandatory state amt” on each conviction reversed; otherwise affirmed.
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Kunal K. Singh,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed inrespect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the JPMBBCommercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2015-C27 (the "Exchange Act periodicreports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

Midland LoanServices, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNRPartners, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asTrustee and Certificate Administrator, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association,as Custodian, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor, Midland LoanServices, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer forThe Outlet Shoppes of the Bluegrass Mortgage Loan, Midland Loan Services, aDivision of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer for The OutletShoppes of the Bluegrass Mortgage Loan, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association,as Trustee and Certificate Administrator for The Outlet Shoppes of theBluegrass Mortgage Loan, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodianfor The Outlet Shoppes of the Bluegrass Mortgage Loan, and PentalphaSurveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor for The Outlet Shoppes of theBluegrass Mortgage Loan.

 

 

 

Dated: March 22, 2018

 

 

/s/ Kunal K. Singh

 

 

President and ChiefExecutive Officer

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
No. 11-9979.

#### Branco *v.*Espinda, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Data Overview**

When possible, data have been distributed in "raw" form, as extracted from the data system, meaning that most items are defined in the data set as string or character variables. Users will need to recode missing responses (None, Don't Know, Do Not Collect) that were allowed by the system in order to analyze numeric responses. 

Due to the complexity of the survey, the files have been distributed in six separate data files A through F. Each file corresponds to a given section of the survey instrument.

The survey instrument appears in the appendix of the report and is also available **here**

Combined Section A corresponds to section A of the survey instrument – Voter Registration

Combined Section B corresponds to section B of the survey instrument – UOCAVA

Combined Section C corresponds to section C of the survey instrument – Domestic Absentee Ballots

Combined Section D corresponds to section D of the survey instrument – Election Administration

Combined Section E corresponds to section E of the survey instrument – Provisional Ballots

Combined Section F corresponds to section F of the survey instrument – Election Day Activities

The top row variable labels correspond to the question numbers in the survey instrument. For example, E1 in the Excel file contains data for question E1 in the instrument.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2


                        CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 302


I, Robert Johnston, Jr., certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q/A of Tutogen Medical, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) [reserved] / [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238
and 34-47986];

         c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and
         5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

<PAGE>

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: July 6, 2006



/s/ Robert Johnston, Jr.
--------------------------------
Robert Johnston, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

APC HOME HEALTH SERVICES INC.,

 

 Appellant,

v.

LUCINA MARTINEZ,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-18-00171-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 7

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2017DCV4119)

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is Appellant’s emergency motion to stay litigation proceedings 

and discovery pending resolution of this interlocutory appeal. The motion to stay is GRANTED. 

Accordingly, the trial court is ordered to stay all proceedings in cause number 2017DCV4119, 

styled APC Home Health Services, Inc. v. Lucina Martinez, pending resolution of this appeal or

further order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1

st day of October, 2018.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
(logo) BERKADIA ®

 

 

Annual Statement asto Compliance

For the CalendarYear 2019 

** **

*Morgan Stanley Bankof America Merrill Lynch Trust,*

*Series 2015-C21*

 

Pursuant to Section 3.01 (13.9) of theSubservicing Agreement governing the referenced transaction (the “ServicingAgreement”), I hereby attest that:

 

i. A review of theactivities and performance of Berkadia as Subservicer during the calendar yearhas been made under my supervision.

 

ii. To the best ofmy knowledge, based on such review, Berkadia as Subservicer has fulfilled, inall material respects, its obligations under this Subservicing Agreementthroughout the calendar year and no default by the Subservicer under theSubservicing Agreement has occurred and is continuing. 

 

Berkadia,

 

 

/s/ Mark E McCool

Mark E. McCool

President

February 10, 2020
2018 EAVS Data Brief: South Dakota EAVS Jurisdictions 

66 

 Voter Registration 

Total Registered Voters, 

Nov. 20181 

594,453 

1 A1a of EAVS 

Registration Forms Received, 

E-Day 2016 – E-Day 20182 

135,610 

2 A3a of EAVS 

New Voters Registered, 

E-Day 2016 – E-Day 20183 

47,404 

3 A3b of EAVS 

Sources of Registration Forms4 

4 A4a-l of EAVS 

Mail/Fax/Email 18,628 

In-Person 34,398 

Online 0 

Motor Vehicle Office 72,884 

Public Assistance 

Office 2,921 

Disability Office 22 

Military Recruitment 

Office 5 

Other Non-NVRA 

Office 1,827 

Registration Drives 4,940 

Other Sources or Not 

Categorized 



--

Voter Turnout 

Voters Participating by Mode5 

In-Person Early Other Mode 

By Mail 

71,434 

21% 

18,273 

6% 

6,632 

2% 

In-Person E-Day 

237,041 

71% 

5 In-person Election Day 

voters is F1b. By-mail voters 

is F1d+F1g. In-person early 

voters is F1f. Other mode is 

F1c+F1e+F1h. 

Total Turnout:6 340,324 

6 F1a of EAVS 

Provisional Voters:7 193 

7 F1e of EAVS 

UOCAVA Voters:8 744 

8 F1c of EAVS 

Election Technology 

Technology Used by Jurisdictions9 

66

DRE w/o DRE with Ballot Scanner Hand Electronic 

49 

0 0 0 

VVPAT VVPAT Marking Count Poll Book 

Device 

9 



9 F3a-d, F5a-F8a, and 

F11a of EAVS 

Election Policies 

Has online voter registration10 

10 Q6 of Policy Survey 

Has a form of same-day voter registration (SDR)11 

11 Q7 of Policy Survey 

Has all-mail elections statewide12 

Has all-mail elections in certain jurisdictions12 

12 Q9a of Policy Survey 

Allows voters to register as permanent absentee 

voters13 

13 Q10 of Policy Survey Requires excuse for by-mail voting14 

Requires excuse for in-person early or in-person 14 Q8 of Policy Survey 

absentee voting15 15 Q12a of Policy Survey 

✔ Uses vote centers16 16 Q13 of Policy Survey 

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at 

www.eac.gov. 

Responses of “Does not apply” and “Data not available”

are shown as zeroes.
# C_2021163EN.01004201.xml

| 3.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 163/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 163/42

---

Action brought on 11 March 2021 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — Rimex Trading (UNK UNIK)

(Case T-144/21)

(2021/C 163/54)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: El Corte Inglés, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J.L. Rivas Zurdo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Rimex Trading (Sofía, Bulgaria)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for the European Union figurative mark UNK UNIK — Application for registration No 17 940 710

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 December 2020 in Case R 2889/2019-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in so far as in rejecting the opponent’s appeal, it confirmed the Opposition Division’s decision rejecting Opposition B 3 069 013 and granting EU trade mark No 17 940 710 UNK UNIK (figurative). |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in so far as in rejecting the opponent’s appeal, it confirmed the Opposition Division’s decision rejecting Opposition B 3 069 013 and granting EU trade mark No 17 940 710 UNK UNIK (figurative).

| — | order the party or parties opposing this action to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the party or parties opposing this action to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Phenoxy

But yl Acry late NMR May 8, 2013 Ti anzhi Zhang 6 

## 1 H NMR