alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
FROM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,407,330
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     99,598
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,565,632
<PP&E>                                       1,091,713
<DEPRECIATION>                               (711,090)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,022,381
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          122,103
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        44,840
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,849,132
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,022,381
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,046,342
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,000,185)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,000,185)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.23)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of JB Oxford Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christopher L. Jarratt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/  Christopher L. Jarratt
Chief Executive Officer
May 13, 2003
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6806

ROY HORTON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus MARK C. HENRY, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-418-JFM) Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 18, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roy Horton, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United States Attorney, Larry David Adams, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Roy Horton appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) petition. The claim raised by Horton was addressed on the merits in his direct appeal. See United States v. Horton , No. 95-5880 (4th Cir. Feb. 24, 1997)(unpublished). This court will not reconsider the issue on collateral review, absent an intervening change in the law. See Boeckenhaupt v. United States , 537 F.2d 1182, 1183 (4th Cir. 1976). There has been no such change. Therefore, we affirm the dismissal of Horton’s petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Elkin Martinez

- Cornelio, Appellant

No. 06

- 19

- 00061

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 of Smith County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 001

- 80114

- 19 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of th e trial court

. We further order that the appellant, Elkin Martinez

- Cornelio, pay all costs of this ap peal.

RENDERED OCTOBER 4, 2019 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 Certification of
Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer
of VCA Antech, Inc.
   (i)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
 Dated:  November 7, 2005
    /s/ ROBERT L. ANTINRobert L. AntinChief Executive Officer/s/ TOMAS W. FULLERTomas W. FullerChief Financial Officer
Principal Financial Officer 42
IIA

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 136

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 16 (legislative day, OCTOBER 2), 1998

Received, read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

1999, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 106(c) of Public Law 105–240 is further
2

HJ 136 CPS

1 amended by striking ‘‘October 16, 1998’’ and inserting in

2 lieu thereof ‘‘October 20, 1998’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 16,

1998.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
#### Winter Park Golf Estates, Inc., Southmore Land Co., Union State Bank and W. H. Tunnicliffe, as Liquidator of Bank of Winter Park, v. City of Winter Park.

153 So. 842.

Opinion Filed March 26, 1934.

Petition for Rehearing Denied April 18, 1934.

*William N. Ellis*and *Allison E. Palmer,*for Appellants;

*Hope Strong,*for Appellee.

*351Per Curiam.

— Since this case was argued and submitted this Court has decided the cases of Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. City of Winter Haven, 112 Fla. 807, 151 Sou. Rep. 321, wherein it was held that if special improvement liens have been validly entered, but are for excessive amounts, the excess may be judicially annulled in appropriate proceedings, on proper allegations and proofs invoking the application of the rule stated in that decision.

In order that the present case may be reconsidered in the court below in the light of the rule of law stated in the above mentioned cases decided here subsequent to the entry of the present appeal in this case, it is ordered that the decree appealed from be reversed without prejudice, and that this cause be remanded to the Circuit Court for further proceedings therein, with leave to each of the parties to make such amendments' to the pleadings and to offer such additional evidence as the chancellor may allow in order to haye the controversy properly re-presented to the court for reconsideration in the light of applicable provisions of law. The costs of the present appeal are initially taxed against the appellants, without prejudice to appellants’ right to move that the same be hereafter allowed and taxed in whole or in part against the appellee, should appellants ultimately prevail in the present litigation.

Decree reversed without prejudice and cause remanded for further proceedings in circuit court.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Brown, J. J., concur.

Buford, J., concurs specially.

Buford, J.

(concurring specially). — I concuT in the conclusions reached by the majority opinion but in addition to what is said there as reasons for reversal, I think the final decree should be reversed on authority of the opinion and *352judgment in the case of State, *et*alv. Hillsborough County,. filed in this Court on December 23, 1933, and reported in 151 Sou. 712, and authorities there cited.
#### My’Ka EL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R. REESE, Officer, Defendant-Appellee, and Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department; M. Sullivan, Officer; S. Selogy, Officer; Meyers, Officer; Agape, Officer; K. S. Kodad, Officer; Issac, Officer; Airtone, Lieutenant; S. Mobley; T. Moore; T. Wilson; J. Fletcher, Officer; J. Parker; P. Moore; L.B. Diggs; B. Butler; Nurse Green, Sergeant; M. W. Womble; M. T. Retort; B. Scarey; T. *722Castano; Stouts, Sergeant; R. Monroe; J. H. Frison; R. Burnett; Bradon Jolly, North Carolina State Trooper; W. L. Canter; Cooper Jerrell, Mecklenburg County Sheriff; Eason; Street, Sergeant; Gant, Sergeant; Hood, Officer; R. Chapman, Mecklenburg County Magistrate, Defendants.

No. 17-2300

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 15, 2018

Decided: February 16, 2018

My’Ka El, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Edward Peterson, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Ap-pellee.

Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

My’Ka El appeals the district court’s February 28, 2017, order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. El previously appealed the district court’s order, and we affirmed the judgment on appeal. *El v. Reese,*694 Fed.Appx. 160 (4th Cir. 2017). Because we previously have affirmed the district court’s order, we dismiss the instant appeal as duplicative and untimely. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be-

fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. .

*DISMISSED*
(logo)CWCapital

ASSETMANAGEMENT

** **

** **

**Annual Statement asto Compliance**

**For the Period ofJanuary 1, 2018 to July 5, 2018**

 

 

**MSBAM 2015-C21**

 

 

Inaccordance Item 1123 of Regulation AB and with the requirements detailed in§13.9 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) for theabove-mentioned CMBS pool, CWCapital Asset Management LLC (“CWCAM”), inits capacity as Excluded Special Servicer, is providing this Officer’sCertificate with respect to the following:

 

(A)      a review of CWCAM’s activities during the preceding calendar year or portionthereof (the "Reporting Period") and of CWCAM’s performanceunder the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision;

 

(B)      to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, CWCAM hasfulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

Shouldyou have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

 

Sincerely,

CWCapitalAsset Management LLC as Excluded Mortgage Loan Special Servicer

 

/s/James P. Shevlin

JamesP. Shevlin 

President/ChiefOperating Officer

 

 

7501Wisconsin Avenue | Suite 500 West | Bethesda, MD | 20814
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 41 (Monday, March 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 9413]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5094]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Oklahoma Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Oklahoma Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 8:00 
a.m. and adjourn at 5:00 p.m. on March 26, 1997, at the Clarion Hotel, 
4345 North Lincoln Boulevard, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105. The 
purpose of the meeting is to hold a community forum on how to file 
various civil rights complaints.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Melvin L. Jenkins, Director of the 
Central Regional Office, 913-551-1400 (TDD 913-551-1414). Hearing-
impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services 
of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at 
least five (5) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, February 21, 1997.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 97-5094 Filed 2-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, James M. Seneff, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund III, Ltd. (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30,  2004 (the  "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date:   August 9, 2004               /s/ James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                     Name:  James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                     Title: Chief Executive Officer

                                    A signed original of this written  statement
                                    required by Section 906 has been provided to
                                    CNL  Income  Fund  III,  Ltd.  and  will  be
                                    retained  by CNL Income Fund III,  Ltd.  and
                                    furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange
                                    Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8493 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8493

  To amend the Passport Act of 1920 to exempt from the collection of 
 certain passport fees an individual who was awarded the Purple Heart, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 1, 2020

 Mr. Ryan (for himself and Mr. Reschenthaler) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Passport Act of 1920 to exempt from the collection of 
 certain passport fees an individual who was awarded the Purple Heart, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Passports for Purple Hearts Act''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM CERTAIN PASSPORT FEES OF AN INDIVIDUAL WHO WAS 
              AWARDED THE PURPLE HEART.

    Section 1 of the Act of June 1, 1920 (22 U.S.C. 214; commonly 
referred to as the ``Passport Act of 1920''), is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), in the third sentence, by inserting 
        ``from an individual who was awarded the Purple Heart;'' before 
        ``or from an individual or individuals abroad''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(c) In this section, the term `passport' includes a passport 
card.''.
                                 <all>
```
Total Polling Locations:

Election Day:7 1,776 

Early Voting:8 -- 

Mail Ballots Transmitted10 Mail Ballots Returned11

247,855 239,488 (96.6% of 

transmitted) 

Mail Ballots Counted12 Mail Ballots Rejected13

233,925 (97.7% of 

returned)

5,563 (2.3% of 

returned) 

Mail Voting Policies 

Excuse is required for mail voting14

Does not conduct all-mail elections15

Some voters can register as permanent absentee16

EAVS Jurisdictions

82

Total Registered Voters as of 

Nov. 3, 20201

2,143,149 

Registration Forms Received2*

453,531 

Total Confirmation Notices Sent3*

82,826 

2020 EAVS Data Brief: Mississippi

 Voter Registration

0.0%

8.5%

24.8%

30.4%

36.3%

Online

Other

Mail, Email, Fax

In-Person

Motor Vehicle Dept.

Source of Registration Applications4

 Voter Turnout  Election Technology

In-Person 

Election 

Day Voters 

1,085,337

81.4%

Mail Voters 

234,500

17.6%

In-Person 

Early Voters

0

0.0%

Other Mode 

14,318

1.1%

Voters Participating By Mode5

82

66

20

15

1 0

Scanner DRE w/o

VVPAT

Electronic

Poll

Books

Ballot

Marking

Device

DRE with

VVPAT

Hand

Count

Technology Used by Jurisdictions9

 Mail Balloting

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at www.eac.gov. 

The data shown are certified as final by state election authorities

Responses of “Does not apply,” “Data not available, ” and “Valid 

skip” are shown as zeroes or dashes. Percentages may not sum 

to 100% because of missing data or rounding. 

. 

* Close of registration for 2018 

general election to close of 

registration for 2020 general 

election. 

1 A1a of EAVS. 

2 A3a of EAVS. 

3 A8a of EAVS. 

4 Mail, Email, Fax is A4a. InPerson is A4b. Online is A4c. 

Motor Vehicle Dept. is A4d. 

Other is the sum of A4e–A4l. 

Denominator is A3a. 

5 In-Person Election Day Voters 

is F1b. Mail Voters is F1d+F1g. 

In-Person Early Voters is F1f. 

Other Mode is F1c+F1e+F1h. 

Denominator is sum of F1b–

F1h. 

6 F1a of EAVS. Denominator 

is citizen voting age 

population (CVAP). 

7 D3a of EAVS. 

8 D4a of EAVS. 

9 F3a–d, F5a, F6a, F7a, F8a, 

and F11a of EAVS. 

10 C1a of EAVS. 

11 C1b of EAVS. 

12 C3a of EAVS. 

13 C4a of EAVS. 

14Q17 of Policy Survey. 

15 Q18 and Q18a of Policy 

Survey. 

16 Q19 of Policy Survey. 

Turnout 

59.4%

6
- 1 -

Alexander Van der Bellen

Managing Director and

Associate General Counsel

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

1212 New York Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20005

202.842.4184

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

March 18, 2013

via email and regulations.gov

Esta Rosenberg

Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Joint Application of Delta Air Lines, Inc. and AeroMexico/Aerolitoral

For Additional DL* U.S. – Mexico transborder codesharing

Docket DOT-OST-2013-0052

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

This letter is to confirm that Delta has polled all of the carriers on the service list to the above 

referenced application and there are no objections. In these circumstances, we urge that the 

application be granted as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted,

Alexander Van der Bellen

cc: Brian Hedberg, DOT

 Bob Finamore, DOT

 info@airlineinfo.com
jxekh 

hxfoi 

ixfip 

fgxhpk 

BalloVUCoWnVed 

feh 

oj 

jh 

gif 

BalloVUejecVed 

"$ 

Mail,Fax,mail 

lection/Regitrar'

Office 

Internet

DMV 

PublicA itance

Office 

Diabilitie Agency 

Military 

RecruitmentOffice 

Ot erStateAgency RegitrationDrive

Regitration:Ot er 

131,270 

515,604 

683,103 

417,101 

12,58213,580 26,028 0 138 0 

egiUVTaVion#oTmoWTce 

oValegiUVeTedSoVeTU 

Ȇ ̊ȉȉȇ ̊ȌȅȄ 

ecVionAVSoVeTegiUVTaVion 

QdfhnoqohnmFnqlnQddhˏd 

ȅ ̊ȋȍȍ ̊ȈȇȌ 

ConfiTmaVionoVificaVionUenV 

ȆȌȉ ̊ȄȈȌ 

Polling 

Place 

UOCAVA Abentee Proviional 

Ballot 

arlyVote 

Center 

Voteby 

Mail 

Turnout: 

Oter 

2,043,828 2,051,452 

0 7,488 136 0 0 

ecVion#VWTnoWVb5
eVhod 

CountedFull Counted 

Part 

Rejected Proviional: 

Oter 

71 

65 

0 0 

RdohnmE˳Oqnˏhnhnmkɮkknon 

UniormedService 

NonmilitaryOverea

Oter 

ecVionBVCASA 

Ȋ ̊ȄȈȋ 

Ȋ ̊Ȉȉȍ 

ȇ ̊ȍȊȋ 

ȅȊ ̊Ȉȋȇ 

BalloVUTanUmiVVed 

A A 

ToXiUionalBalloVoValyfhk WTnoWVoValygxejfxijg 

Note: So e field ay be blank or zero due to data not being reportedor 

juridiction notcollectingtatdata. 

Rdkdo ̨ QEG 

A 

 

 

 

 

 

 

f 

 

 

 

 

sss

s s

s s

- s s

gefk"AS!aVaBTief
	

U ' 

E

E s s

h

s h

h

s s s E

h h

m sm

s s h
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

James Franklin Boyle, * From the 29 th District Court

of Palo Pinto County

Trial Court No. 157 95

.

Vs. No. 11

- 1 7

- 00 1 0 7

- CR * April 4 , 201 9

The Sta te of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Stretcher , J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C. J.,

Stretcher , J. , and Wright, S.C.J., sitting

by assignment )

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52**  **[R09-OAR-2010-0718; FRL- Determinations of Attainment by the Applicable Attainment**  **Date for the Hayden, Nogales, Paul Spur/Douglas PM 10**  **Nonattainment Areas, Arizona; Withdrawal of Direct Final Rule**  AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule.

----------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: Due to the receipt of an adverse comment, EPA is withdrawing the November 2, 2010 (75 FR 67220), direct final rule determining that the Hayden, Nogales, and Paul Spur/Douglas areas in Arizona had attained the national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) for particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of less than or equal to ten microns by the applicable attainment date. On the basis of this determination, EPA concluded that these three “moderate” nonattainment areas were not subject to reclassification. In the direct final rule, EPA stated that if adverse comments were submitted by December 2, 2010, the rule would be withdrawn and not take effect. On November 3, 2010, EPA received a comment. EPA believes this comment is adverse and, therefore, EPA is withdrawing the direct final rule. EPA will address the comment in a subsequent final action based upon the proposed action also published onNovember 2, 2010 (75 FR 67303). EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. DATES: The direct final rule published at 75 FR 67220 on November 2, 2010, is withdrawn as of [INSERT DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wienke Tax, Air Planning Office, Air Division (AIR-2), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, (415) 947-4192, tax.wienke@epa.gov

.

**List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52**

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, National Parks, Particulate matter, Wilderness Areas.

**Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.**

November 19, 2010 _/s/ Keith Takata

_____________ Dated Keith Takata, Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.