alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 42 (Tuesday, March 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9813-9814]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5442]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION


Meeting of the Board of Directors Operations and Regulations 
Committee

TIME AND DATE: The Operations and Regulations Committee of the Legal 
Services Corporation Board of Directors will meet on March 7, 1997. The 
meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m. and continue until the committee 
concludes its agenda.


[[Page 9814]]


LOCATION: Legal Services Corporation, 750 First Street, N.E.,--11th 
Flr. Board Room, Washington, D.C. 20002.

STATUS OF MEETING: Open, except that a portion of the meeting may be 
closed pursuant to a unanimous vote of the Board of Directors to hold 
an executive session of the Committee. At the executive session, the 
Corporation's counsel will report to the Committee on litigation to 
which the Corporation is or may become a party. The closing is 
authorized by the relevant provisions of the Government in the Sunshine 
Act [5 U.S.C. Sec. 552b(c)(10)] and the corresponding regulation of the 
Legal Services Corporation [45 C.F.R. Sec. 1622.5(h)]. A copy of the 
General Counsel's Certification that the closing is authorized by law 
will be posted for public inspection at Corporation headquarters, 750 
First Street N.E., Washington, D.C.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Open Session

    1. Approval of agenda.
    2. Approval of minutes of January 5, 1997.
    3. Consider and act on revisions to the Corporation's Personnel 
Manual, with principal attention devoted to sections 1, 2, 3 and 8.
    4. Consider and act on draft revisions to 45 C.F.R. Part 1642, the 
Corporation's interim regulation on attorneys' fees.

Closed Session

    5. Report from the General Counsel on potential and pending 
litigation involving the Corporation.

Open Session

    6. Consider and act on draft interim revisions to 45 C.F.R. Part 
1610, the Corporation's regulation on use of non-LSC funds.
    7. Consider and act on proposed revisons to the Corporation's 
Accounting Guide for Recipients and Auditors.
    8. Consider and act on draft revisions to 45 C.F.R. Part 1639, the 
Corporation's interim regulation on welfare reform.
    9. Consider and act on proposed 45 C.F.R. Part 1641, a new 
regulation on Debarment, Suspension and Removal of Recipient Auditors.
    10. Consider and act on other business.

CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION: Victor M. Fortuno, General Counsel, 
(202) 336-8810.

Special Needs: Upon request, meeting notices will be made available in 
alternate formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments. 
Individuals who have a disability and need an accommodation to attend 
the meeting may notify Barbara Asante at (202) 336-8892.

    Dated: February 28, 1997.
Victor M. Fortuno,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 97-5442 Filed 2-28-97; 2:44 pm]
BILLING CODE 7050-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       6,382,058
<SECURITIES>                                 1,262,753
<RECEIVABLES>                                  190,186
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,913,966
<PP&E>                                       2,510,407
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,193,600)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,538,835
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,765,045
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,375
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,766,415
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,538,835
<SALES>                                        373,994
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               373,994
<CGS>                                           21,539
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,539
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               969,603
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,388
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (565,617)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (565,617)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (565,617)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2021263EN.01002801.xml

| 5.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/28

---

Action brought on 11 May 2021 — Tigercat International v EUIPO — Caterpillar (Tigercat)

(Case T-251/21)

(2021/C 263/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Tigercat International Inc. (Cambridge, Ontario, Canada) (represented by: S. Weidert, M. Pemsel and H. Bug, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Caterpillar Inc. (Peoria, Illinois, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark Tigercat — Application for registration No 12 124 368

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 February 2021 in Case R 16/2020-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and the other parties to the proceedings before the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO to pay the costs including the costs in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the other parties to the proceedings before the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO to pay the costs including the costs in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) in connection with Article 8(1)(b) and Article 85(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) in connection with Article 8(1)(b) and Article 85(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
No. 11-1510.

#### Ellis *v.*City of Fort Worth, Texas.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-10252.

No. 11-10253.

#### Gorbatova *v.*Hartstein et al.; and Gorbatova *v.*Hartstein et al.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
(logo)BERKADIA

 

Annual Statement asto Compliance

For the Year EndedDecember 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”)

*Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation,  *

*Series 2015-DC1*

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 of the Poolingand Servicing Agreement governing the referenced transaction (the “ServicingAgreement”), I hereby attest that:

 

       i.           Areview of the activities and performance of Berkadia as Subservicer during theReporting Period has been made under my supervision.

 

      ii.           To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, Berkadia as Subservicer hasfulfilled, in all material respects, its obligations under this SubservicingAgreement throughout the Reporting Period and no default by the Subservicerunder the Subservicing Agreement has occurred and is continuing.

 

Berkadia, 

 

/s/Mark E. McCool

MarkE. McCool

President

February10, 2018
40

0

32

72

BallotsCounted

2 0

0

2

BallotsRejected

GUAM

Mail,Fax,Email

Election/Registrar's

Office

Internet

DM

V

Public

Assistance

Office

DisabilitiesAgency

Military

RecruitmentOffice

OtherState

Agency

RegistrationDrives

Registration:Other

8,858 8,323

405 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

RegistrationFormSource

TotalRegisteredVoters

51,720

SectionA-VoterRegistration

RegistrationFormsReceived

8,858

ConfirmationNotificationsSent

5,218

Polling

Place

UOCAVA Absentee Provisional

Ballot

EarlyVote

Center

Voteby

Mail

Turnout:

Other

34,236

1,385

72 30 0 131 0

SectionF-TurnoutbyMethod

CountedFull Counted

Part

Rejected Provisional:

Other

12

16

93

0

SectionE-ProvisionalBallots

UniformedService

Non-militaryOverseas

Other

SectionB-UOCAVA

66

65

0

131

BallotsTransmitted

TOTAL TOTAL

ProvisionalBallotTotal:121 TurnoutTotal:35,854

Select: GUAM

TOTAL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                          

  

2016EAVSDataBrief 

U i
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3031325-FEB-201108:17 AM
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of The Jones Financial
Companies, L.L.L.P. on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 26, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Steven Novik, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership,
certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
              Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
              1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
              in all material respects, the financial condition and
              results of operations of the Partnership.

                                    /s/ Steven Novik
                                    ---------------------------------------
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P.
                                    May 4, 2004
<PAGE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of The Jones Financial
Companies, L.L.L.P. on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 26, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Douglas E. Hill, Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership,
certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
              Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
              1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
              in all material respects, the financial condition and
              results of operations of the Partnership.

                                    /s/  Douglas E. Hill
                                    ---------------------------------------
                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                    The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P.
                                    May 4, 2004
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JAYNECIA FLOYD,

Appellant,

v.

SHARNELL LORANDA LOUIS,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-1265

[April 3, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Stefanie C. Moon, Judge; L.T. Case No. DVCE23-003421.

Jaynecia Floyd, North Lauderdale, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 

1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979).

CONNER, KUNTZ and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Patrick M. YANSANE, Appellant

No. 16-3085

September Term, 2017

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Filed On: October 31, 2017

Elizabeth Trosman, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Eric Nguyen, USAO Appellate Counsel, U.S. Attorney’s Office, (USA) Appellate Division, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Tony Axam, Jr., Esquire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, A. J. Kramer, Federal Public Defender, Office of the Federal Public Defender (FPD), Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellant

Before: Henderson and Srinivasan, Circuit Judges, and Williams, Senior Circuit Judge

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and arguments of the parties. The Court has afforded the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See Fed. R. App. P. 36; D.C. Cir. R. 36(d). It is

*719ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the order of the District Court entered on July 6, 2016 be AFFIRMED.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s second motion for a reduced sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Having reduced appellant’s sentence by 37 months after his first request for a reduced sentence in 2012, the district court properly weighed the sentencing factors anew and concluded within its reasonable discretion that no further reduction was warranted.

Appellant does not contend that there was any procedural error in the district court’s decision but argues that the district court’s refusal to reduce his sentence after the Sentencing Guidelines had changed for a second time was substantively unreasonable, Our precedent is clear that a change in the Guidelines does not automatically require a “downshift” in prior sentences, and it is not an abuse of discretion for a district court to refuse a reduction “so long as the court properly applies § 3553(a).” *United States v. Jones,*846 F.3d 366, 372 (D.C. Cir. 2017). The district court considered the large quantity of drugs appellant intended to distribute, his criminal history, and his pattern of dangerous conduct' and reasonably concluded that his sentence should not be further reduced.

Pursuant to Rule 36 of this Court, this disposition will not be published. The clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after the disposition of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing *en banc.*See Fed, R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. R. 41.
**Exhibit 32**

**Certification ofChief Executive OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of Alliance Imaging, Inc. (the “*Company*”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge,that:

(i)    theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterended June 30, 2007 (the “*Report*”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)   theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:August 9, 2007
|        | /s/ Paul S. Viviano       |   |
|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|   | Paul S. Viviano           |
|   | Chairman of the Board and |
|   | Chief Executive Officer   |

 

----

**Certification ofChief Financial OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of Alliance Imaging, Inc. (the “*Company*”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge,that:

(i)    theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterended June 30, 2007 (the “*Report*”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)   theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:August 9, 2007
|        | /s/ Howard K. Aihara                                 |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Howard K. Aihara                                     |
|   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Total Polling Locations:

Election Day:7 1,950 

Early Voting:8 82 

Mail Ballots Transmitted10 Mail Ballots Returned11

344,600 280,106 (81.3% of 

transmitted) 

Mail Ballots Counted12 Mail Ballots Rejected13

275,017 (98.2% of 

returned)

5,089 (1.8% of 

returned) 

Mail Voting Policies 

No excuse is required for mail voting14

Does not conduct all-mail elections15

No permanent absentee voting list16

EAVS Jurisdictions

77 

Total Registered Voters as of 

Nov. 3, 20201

2,259,107 

Registration Forms Received2*

666,094 

Total Confirmation Notices Sent3*

181,034 

2020 EAVS Data Brief: Oklahoma

 Voter Registration

7.3%

12.6%

13.0%

22.5%

44.7%

Other

In-Person

Online

Mail, Email, Fax

Motor Vehicle Dept.

Source of Registration Applications4

 Voter Turnout  Election Technology

In-Person 

Election 

Day Voters 

1,114,001

71.2%

Mail Voters 

275,017

17.6%

In-Person 

Early Voters 

167,516

10.7%

Other Mode 

8,352

0.5%

Voters Participating By Mode5

77

0 0 0 0 0

Scanner DRE w/o

VVPAT

DRE with

VVPAT

Ballot

Marking

Device

Hand

Count

Electronic

Poll

Books

Technology Used by Jurisdictions9

 Mail Balloting

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at www.eac.gov. 

The data shown are certified as final by state election authorities

Responses of “Does not apply,” “Data not available, ” and “Valid 

skip” are shown as zeroes or dashes. Percentages may not sum 

to 100% because of missing data or rounding. 

. 

* Close of registration for 2018

general election to close of 

registration for 2020 general 

election. 

1 A1a of EAVS. 

2 A3a of EAVS. 

3 A8a of EAVS. 

4 Mail, Email, Fax is A4a. InPerson is A4b. Online is A4c. 

Motor Vehicle Dept. is A4d. 

Other is the sum of A4e–A4l. 

Denominator is A3a. 

5 In-Person Election Day Voters 

is F1b. Mail Voters is F1d+F1g. 

In-Person Early Voters is F1f. 

Other Mode is F1c+F1e+F1h. 

Denominator is sum of F1b–

F1h. 

6 F1a of EAVS. Denominator 

is citizen voting age 

population (CVAP). 

7 D3a of EAVS. 

8 D4a of EAVS. 

9 F3a–d, F5a, F6a, F7a, F8a, 

and F11a of EAVS. 

10 C1a of EAVS. 

11 C1b of EAVS. 

12 C3a of EAVS. 

13 C4a of EAVS. 

14Q17 of Policy Survey. 

15 Q18 and Q18a of Policy 

Survey. 

16 Q19 of Policy Survey. 

Turnout 

54.4%

6
---

Exhibit 99.6

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Osisko Gold Royalties
Ltd (the Company) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2016 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Sean Roosen, Chair of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|Date: | March 27, 2017                | 
|----- | ----------------------------- | 
|      |                               | 
|By:   | /s/
      Sean Roosen         | 
|      | Sean Roosen                   | 
|      | Chair of the Board of         | 
|      | Directors and Chief Executive | 
|      | Officer                       | 

---
(logo) Rialto CAPITAL

 

 

**2016 Annual Statement ofServicer Compliance (Item 1123)**

 

 

Pooling and ServicingAgreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of February 1, 2015 by and among GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, RialtoCapital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC asOperating Advisor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as CertificateAdministrator and Wilmington Trust, National Association as Trustee relating tothe GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2015-GC28, Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2015-GC28 **(GSMS 2015-GC28)**

 

 

The undersigned, a dulyauthorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the“Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1. All servicing activitiesand performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2. A review of the servicingactivities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1,2016 to December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordancewith the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under mysupervision.

 

3. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in allmaterial respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure tofulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and thenature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

Certified by: /s/ Adam Singer

Adam Singer, Managing Director

 

Date: March 1, 2017
1

From: Boyd.Rochelle@epamail.epa.gov

Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 8:28 AM

To: VanMatre, Jeff

Subject: Re: Permanently Closed

The response was due in January and we are now assembling the data and plan to send the data forward to the modelers 

in the next 2 weeks. We would need the data no later than next week. The lat/longs, the emissions verification (except 

POM), the facility boundary and map of the emission points are the most important things. We could send you a jpeg file 

that would be much simpler to use rather than the Google earth kmz file that we sent. Let me know. Thanks 

Rochelle Boyd, Environmental Engineer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Sector Policies and Programs Division

109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711

Mail Drop D243-02

Ph: (919) 541-1390 Fax: (919) 541-3207

Email: boyd.rochelle@epa.gov 

From: "VanMatre, Jeff" <JVanMatre@CenturyWV.com>

To: Rochelle Boyd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 03/03/2011 01:07 AM

Subject: Re: Permanently Closed

No it isn't permanently closed I just lack resources to compile the response. When must you have our information and I 

will try to get it together. 

From: Boyd.Rochelle@epamail.epa.gov <Boyd.Rochelle@epamail.epa.gov> 

To: VanMatre, Jeff 

Sent: Wed Mar 02 07:30:40 2011

Subject: Permanently Closed 

We will assume that the Century plant is permanently closed and will not be reopening in the future. Is this correct? We 

have not received any response from your company in regards to the information that we have requested. 

Rochelle Boyd, Environmental Engineer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Sector Policies and Programs Division

109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711

Mail Drop D243-02

Ph: (919) 541-1390 Fax: (919) 541-3207

Email: boyd.rochelle@epa.gov