alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6867
JOHN JASPER MORTON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-1362-AM) Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 13, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Jasper Morton, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court'sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Morton v. Director, Va. Dep't of Corr. , No.CA-96-1362-AM (E.D. Va. May 2, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 6 (Thursday, January 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1340]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-510]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[WY-040-07-1430-01; WYW-137885]


Realty Action; Direct Sale of Public Lands; Wyoming

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of realty action.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The following public land in Sublette County has been examined 
and found suitable for direct sale under Section 203 of the Federal 
Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1713) at not less 
than the fair market value.

Sixth Principal Meridian

T. 32 N., R. 107W.,
    Sec. 23, Lot 1.

    The above lands contain .06 acres, more or less.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The BLM proposes to sell the surface estate 
of the above described land to Kenneth and Mary J. Hallinan. A portion 
of their home was inadvertently constructed on public land.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Grace Jensen, Realty Specialist, 
Bureau of Land Management, Pinedale Resource Area, P.O. Box 768, 
Pinedale, Wyoming 82941, 307-367-4358.
    The proposed sale is consistent with the Pinedale Resource Area 
Management Plan and would serve important public objectives which 
cannot be achieved prudently or feasibly elsewhere. The land contains 
no other known public values. Detailed information concerning this 
action is available for review at the Bureau of Land Management, 
Pinedale Resource Area Office, 432 E. Mill Street, Pinedale, Wyoming, 
82941.
    Conveyance of the public land will be subject to:
    1. Reservation of a right-of-way for ditches or canals pursuant to 
the Act of August 30, 1890, 43 U.S.C. 945.
    2. Reservation of all minerals to the United States of America, 
together with the right to prospect for, mine and remove the minerals.
    3. All valid existing rights documented on the official public land 
records at the time of conveyance.

Upon publication of this notice in the Federal Register, the land will 
be segregated from all other forms of appropriation under the public 
land laws, including the general mining laws, except for conveyance 
under the Federal Land Policy and Management Act and leasing under the 
mineral leasing laws. The segregative effect will end upon issuance of 
the patent or 270 days from the date of this publication, whichever 
occurs first.
    For a period of forty-five (45) days from the date of issuance of 
this notice, interested parties may submit comments to the Bureau of 
Land Management, District Manager, Rock Springs, 280 Highway 191 North, 
Rock Springs, Wyoming 82901. Any adverse comments will be reviewed by 
the State Director, who may sustain, vacate or modify this realty 
action. In the absence of any objections this proposed realty action 
will become final.

    Dated: December 18, 1996.
Michelle J. Chavez,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-510 Filed 1-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-M
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

OFFICE OF 

WATER 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Revising Public Comment Deadline for EPA-HQ-OW-2016-0146 on 

Regulations.gov for Public Access 

FROM: 

THRU: 

TO: 

Erin Flannery-Kei_0"'·...., '::U~ ... ~'t- Water Permits Division r C Q- ~. 

Office of Wastewater ~~ement 

Deborah G. Nagle N~ Director, Water Permits Division 

Office of Wastewater Management 

HQ Docket Manager 

JUN 2 7 2016 

This memorandum authorizes revising the public comment period for of EPA-HQ-OW2016-0 I 46 on Regulations.gov for public access. The comment period should now end on 

August 2, 2016. 

This is a non-rulemaking docket. It is related to the National Pollutant Discharge 

Elimination System (NPDES): Applications and Program Updates Proposed Rule, EPAHQ-OW-2016-0145 ("NPDES Updates Rule"). 

Docket EPA-HQ-OW-2016-0146 includes draft revised NPDES permit application forms. 

In this docket, members of the public are encouraged to submit comments on the permit 

application forms that are not related to the proposed regulatory changes in the NPDES 

Updates Rule. 

Dockets EPA-HQ-OW-2016-0145 and 0146 were originally posted on May 18, 2016 and 

the public comment period was originally going to end on July 18, 2016. On June 27, 

2016, EPA extended the public comment period for the NPDES Updates Rule, Docket 

No. EPA-HQ-OW-2016-0145 to August 2, 2016. 

By this memorandum, the public comment period for Docket No. EPA-HQ-OW-2016-

0 I 46 will now close on August 2, 2016. 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2016-0146, to the 

Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions 

for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from 

Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not 

submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. 

The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of 

all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment 

contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file 

sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making 

effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin Flannery-Keith, Water Permits 

Division, Office of Wastewater Management, Mail Code 4203M, Environmental 

Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460; (202) 566-

0689; flannery-keith.erin@epa.gov.
No. 11-10275.

#### McKnight *v.*Texas.

Ct. App. Tex., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Pursuant To Section 1350 Of Chapter 63 Of 18 U.S.C.
As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002/SEC Rule 13a-14(b)
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: August 18, 2006
    /s/ Joseph F. ONeillJoseph F. ONeillChief Executive Officer
# Adult Education

- U.S. Department of Education Announces Finalists in the Future Finder Challenge to Advance Digital Career Navigation Tools for Adult Learners Today, the U.S. Department of Education is announcing five finalists in the Future Finder Challenge, a $1 million challenge to reimagine career navigation for adult learners. This is the first time the Department has launched a challenge to advance the education technology space for adult learners.
- U.S. Department of Education Launches $1 Million Future Finder Challenge to Reimagine Career Navigation for Adult Learners Today, in recognition of National Adult Education and Family Literacy Week, the U.S. Department of Education (Department) is proud to launch Stage 1 of the Future Finder Challenge, a $1 million challenge to reimagine career navigation for adult learners.
- Secretary Cardona, Secretary Walsh, Swiss President Parmelin Sign Memorandum of Understanding to Expand Registered Apprenticeship Programs in the United States WASHINGTON – U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona, U.S. Secretary of Labor Marty Walsh, Deputy Secretary of Commerce Don Graves, and Switzerland's President Guy Parmelin signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) today to expand apprenticeships among Swiss companies and Swiss-invested companies in the United States, and to promote job creation in both countries.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12
 
                      RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                             THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
                                                              FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER ENDED             ------------------------
                                                    -----------------------------------------------------   MARCH 28,    MARCH 29,
                                                      1993       1994       1995       1996       1997        1998         1997
                                                    ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  -----------  -----------
                                                                                (AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
<S>                                                 <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>          <C>
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations........  $  11,975  $  (2,256) $  11,707  $  18,733  $  29,456   $   9,484    $   5,245
  Add provision for income taxes..................      7,718     (1,493)     8,126     12,986     20,415       6,591        3,645
                                                    ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  -----------  -----------
                                                       19,693     (3,749)    19,833     31,719     49,871      16,075        8,890
Fixed Charges:
  Interest........................................      8,596     12,031     14,635     20,405     29,024       7,532        7,036
  Interest factor portion of rentals..............      2,345      2,851      3,266      3,993      5,981       1,591        1,184
                                                    ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  -----------  -----------
    Total fixed charges...........................     10,941     14,882     17,901     24,398     35,005       9,123        8,220
                                                    ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  -----------  -----------
Earnings before income taxes and fixed charges....  $  30,634  $  11,133  $  37,734  $  56,117  $  84,876   $  25,198    $  17,110
                                                    ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  -----------  -----------
                                                    ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  -----------  -----------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges................       2.80       0.75       2.11       2.30       2.42        2.76         2.08
                                                    ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  -----------  -----------
                                                    ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  -----------  -----------
</TABLE>
 
                                       14
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 26, 2011

d0125 

# Order

January 26, 2011

142289 & (16)

SHERYL GALE JONE S-COLLIER, Personal Representative of the Estate of MADELLE L. JONES, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142289 COA: 300884 Wayne CC: 04-427696-CH LOUIS CUNNINGHAM, Defendant-Appellant,

and

CUNNINGHAM ADVISORY SERVICES, INC., THE LOUIS CUNNINGHAM TRUST, LEC PROPERTIES a/k/a LEC PROPERTIES, LTD., LEC PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, and LEC PROPERTIES PARTNERSHIP, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the Nove mber 4, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be revi ewed by this Court.

Z AHRA , J., did not participate because he wa s on the Court of Appeals panel.
2018 EAVS Data Brief: Arkansas EAVS Jurisdictions 

75 

Voter Registration 

 

 

 



Total Registered Voters, 

Nov. 20181 

1,786,840 

1 A1a of EAVS 

Registration Forms Received, 

E-Day 2016 – E-Day 20182 

448,787 

2 A3a of EAVS 

New Voters Registered, 

E-Day 2016 – E-Day 20183 

214,677 

3 A3b of EAVS 

Sources of Registration Forms4 

4 A4a-l of EAVS 

Mail/Fax/Email 65,878 

In-Person 81,086 

Online 0 

Motor Vehicle Office 241,913 

Public Assistance 

Office 21,949 



Disability Office 422 

Military Recruitment 

Office 45 

Other Non-NVRA 

Office 1,720 

Registration Drives 10,362 

Other Sources or Not 

Categorized 25,412 

Voter Turnout 

y 



Voters Participating by Mode5 

Other Mode 

3,180 

0% 

In-Person Early 

413,254 

52% 

In-Person E-Da

358,869 

46% 

By Mail 

13,721 

2% 

5 In-person Election Day 

voters is F1b. By-mail voters 

is F1d+F1g. In-person early 

voters is F1f. Other mode is 

F1c+F1e+F1h. 

Total Turnout:6 790,656 

6 F1a of EAVS 

Provisional Voters:7 1,139 

7 F1e of EAVS 

UOCAVA Voters:8 1,989 

8 F1c of EAVS 

Election Technology 



Technology Used by Jurisdictions9 

45 

4 

19 

39 

7 

DRE w/o DRE with Ballot Scanner Hand Electronic 

VVPAT VVPAT Marking Count Poll Book 

Device 

46 

9 F3a-d, F5a-F8a, and 

F11a of EAVS 

Election Policies 

Has online voter registration10 

10 Q6 of Policy Survey 

Has a form of same-day voter registration (SDR)11 

11 Q7 of Policy Survey 

Has all-mail elections statewide12 

Has all-mail elections in certain jurisdictions12 

12 Q9a of Policy Survey 

Allows voters to register as permanent absentee 

voters13 

✔ 13 Q10 of Policy Survey Requires excuse for by-mail voting14 

Requires excuse for in-person early or in-person 14 Q8 of Policy Survey 

absentee voting15 15 Q12a of Policy Survey 

✔ Uses vote centers16 16 Q13 of Policy Survey 

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at 

www.eac.gov. 

Responses of “Does not apply” and “Data not available”

are shown as zeroes.
#### RQ SQUARED, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee

2017-1632

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

January 11, 2018

Adam Miller, Buckley Sandler LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by Christopher Regan, Timothy Coley.

David Michael Kerr, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Aso represented by Chad A. Readler, Robert E. Kirschman, Jr„ Steven J. Gillingham.

(Newman, Wallach, and Stoll, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
(logo) Grant Thornton

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

** **

|  

 

 

  | **Audit • Tax  •Advisory**

**Grant Thornton LLP**

1201 Walnut St, Suite 2200

Kansas City, Missouri 64106

T 816.412.2400

F 816.412.2404 |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Board of Directors 

Situs Holdings, LLC

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying CertificationRegarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria(“Management’s Assertion”), that Situs Holdings, LLC (the“Company”) complied with servicing criteria set forth in Items1117, 1119, 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(vii) of the U.S.  Securities andExchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the Operating or Trust AdvisorServices Platform (the “Platform) as of and for the year ended December31, 2016. The platform consists of asset-backed transactions and securitiesdefined by management in Appendix B of Management’s report. Management isresponsible for the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’sassertion about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteriafor the Platform based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting OversightBoard (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis,evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria for the Platform and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selectedasset-backed transactions and securities constituting the Platform and evaluatingwhether the Company performed servicing activities related to thosetransactions and securities in compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria for the period covered by this report. Accordingly, our testing maynot have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transactionor security constituting the Platform. Further, our examination was notdesigned to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to theperiod covered by this report and that may have affected the Company’sservicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe thatour examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examinationdoes not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance withthe applicable servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that Situs Holdings, LLC complied with theaforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year endedDecember 31, 2016, for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

 

Kansas City, Missouri 

February 28, 2017
WALTER P. JENKINS,

INDIVIDUALLY

,

Appellant,

v.

ED CRAPO, AS PROPERTY

APPRAISER FOR ALACHUA

COUNTY, FLORIDA, and

DEVAUGHN SLONE and

MILTON H. BAXLEY II, COTRUSTEES OF LLC TRUST

,

Appellees. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16-1194

_____________________________/

Opinion filed May 19, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. Monica J. Brasington

, Judge.

Walter P. Jenkins, Individually, pro se

, Appellant.

John C. Dent, Jr., of Dent & McClain, Sarasota, and C. Valentine Bates, of Bates

& Brown, Micanopy

, for Appellees (no appearances).

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

THOMAS, WINOKUR, and JAY

, JJ., CONCUR.
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press

.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 22

- BG

- 672

IN RE JASON WAYNE SHOEMAKER

, DDN 2020

- D 194

A n Administratively Suspended Member of the

Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bar Registration No. 489748

BEFORE: Deahl and AliKhan , Associate Judges, and Washington , Senior Judge.

O R D E R (FILED

— November 10, 2022)

On consideration of the certified order from the state of Maryland disbarring respondent fro m the practice of law by consent ; this court’s September 2 , 2022 , order suspending respondent pending final disposition of this proceeding and directing him to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed ; and the

state ment of Disciplinary Counsel; and it appearing that respondent has not filed a

response or his D.C . Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit with this court

, it is

ORDERED that Jason Wayne Shoemaker is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Sibley , 990 A.2d 483, 487

- 88 (D.C. 2010) (explaining that there is a rebuttable presumption in favor of imposition of identical discipline and exceptions to this presumption should be rare) ; In re

Fuller , 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C . 2007) ( explaining that a rebuttable presumption of

iden tical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate)

. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that

, for purposes of reinstatement, respondent’s

disbarment will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g).

PER CURIAM