alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(B)

     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

     As independent petroleum engineers, we hereby consent to the
use of our name in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1996.  We further consent to the inclusion of our estimate
of reserves and present value of future net reserves in such Annual
Report.

                         /s/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY  
                              PETROLEUM ENGINEERS
                        
                         RYDER SCOTT COMPANY 
                         PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

Houston, Texas
March 20, 1997
#### COM. v. FLOYD, T.

3403 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/25/2017

Reargument Denied 12/6/2017

CP-51-CR-1215912-1977 (Philadelphia)

Affirmed
#### COM. v. SPRINGER, E.

438 WDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/21/2017

CP-61-CR-0000611-2016 (Venango)

Affirmed
PSEG CONFIDENTIAL

                                                                      EXHIBIT 99

        Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
                            of the United States Code

     I, E. James Ferland, Chief Executive Officer of Public Service Enterprise
Group Incorporated, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Annual
Report of Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2002 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated.

                                         /s/ E. James Ferland
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         E. James Ferland
                                         Public Service Enterprise Group
                                           Incorporated
                                         Chairman of the Board, President and
                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                         February 25, 2003
# C_2021329EN.01003801.xml

| 16.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/38

---

Action brought on 24 June 2021 — Future Motion v EUIPO — El Corte Inglés (HYPERCORE)

(Case T-356/21)

(2021/C 329/50)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Future Motion, Inc. (Santa Cruz, California, United States) (represented by: F.-M. Orou, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: El Corte Inglés, SA (Madrid, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the mark HYPERCORE — International registration designating the European Union No 1 360 694

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 April 2021 in Case R 1229/2020-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs, |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs,

| — | in the alternative, if the other party before the Board of Appeal intervenes, order EUIPO and the intervener jointly and severally to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, if the other party before the Board of Appeal intervenes, order EUIPO and the intervener jointly and severally to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>
         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
         UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000
         AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
         STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                                 <C>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS                     6-MOS
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-2000               JAN-01-1999
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-2000               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                              6,032,000                 5,678,000
<SECURITIES>                        0                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                       28,549,000                17,271,000
<ALLOWANCES>                        492,000                   431,000
<INVENTORY>                         19,056,000                9,712,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    55,679,000                35,929,000
<PP&E>                              9,336,000                 8,018,000
<DEPRECIATION>                      000,000                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      72,876,000                49,420,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               30,984,000                13,882,000
<BONDS>                             0                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0                         0
<PREFERRED>                         0                         0
<COMMON>                            54,000                    54,000
<OTHER-SE>                          35,619,000                31,825,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        72,876,000                49,420,000
<SALES>                             45,460,000                37,719,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    45,460,000                37,719,000
<CGS>                               27,118,000                22,601,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       41,638,000                34,104,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    170,000                   234,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  365,000                   106,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     3,652,000                 3,381,000
<INCOME-TAX>                        1,242,000                 1,191,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 0                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                      0                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0                         0
<CHANGES>                           0                         0
<NET-INCOME>                        2,410,000                 2,190,000
<EPS-BASIC>                         .44                       .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                       .43                       .40


</TABLE>
No. 11-10276.

#### Mack *v.*Curran et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certio-rari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8614 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8614

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include home-schooling 
  supplies in the educator expense deduction, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 16, 2020

  Mr. Norman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include home-schooling 
  supplies in the educator expense deduction, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Home Educators are Teachers Act of 
2020''.

SEC. 2. HOME-SCHOOL EDUCATORS AND HOME-SCHOOLING EXPENSES INCLUDED AS 
              PART OF DEDUCTION FOR CERTAIN EXPENSES OF ELEMENTARY AND 
              SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 62 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(2)(D), by inserting ``or home'' after 
        ``in the classroom'', and
            (2) in subsection (d), by inserting ``or home'' after ``in 
        a school''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2019.

SEC. 3. INFLATION ADJUSTMENT FOR DEDUCTION FOR CERTAIN EXPENSES OF 
              ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 62(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``2015'' and inserting ``2021'', and
            (2) by striking ``calendar year 2014'' and inserting 
        ``calendar year 2020''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2019.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS OR GUIDANCE CLARIFYING APPLICATION OF DEDUCTION FOR 
              CERTAIN EXPENSES OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL 
              TEACHERS.

    Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of the Treasury (or the Secretary's delegate) shall by 
regulation or other guidance clarify that individuals who provide home-
school education are eligible educators for purposes of the educator 
expense deduction described in section 62(a)(2)(D) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986, and such individuals may deduct home-schooling 
expenses under such section.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8718 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8718

  To extend the statute of limitations for offenses under the Federal 
                     Election Campaign Act of 1971.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 30, 2020

  Ms. Speier (for herself, Ms. Lee of California, Ms. Norton, and Ms. 
  Velazquez) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the statute of limitations for offenses under the Federal 
                     Election Campaign Act of 1971.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR OFFENSES UNDER 
              FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN ACT OF 1971.

    (a) Civil Offenses.--Section 309(a) of the Federal Election 
Campaign Act of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30109(a)) is amended by inserting after 
paragraph (9) the following new paragraph:
    ``(10) No person shall be subject to a civil penalty under this 
subsection with respect to a violation of this Act unless a complaint 
is filed with the Commission with respect to the violation under 
paragraph (1), or the Commission responds to information with respect 
to the violation which is ascertained in the normal course of carrying 
out its supervisory responsibilities under paragraph (2), not later 
than 15 years after the date on which the violation occurred.''.
    (b) Criminal Offenses.--Section 406(a) of such Act (52 U.S.C. 
30145(a)) is amended by striking ``5 years'' and inserting ``10 
years''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to violations occurring on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                    SUBSIDIARIES OF ATP OIL & GAS CORPORATION

             Name                                       Jurisidication

       ATP Energy, Inc.                                     Texas
  ATP Oil & Gas (UK) Limited                            United Kingdom
ATP Oil & Gas (Netherlands) B.V.                          Netherlands
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****    - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский 

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

        - Student Loans
        - Grants
        - Laws
        - Data

            - taxonomy view
            - Utah 

# Utah 

# Utah 

                      -  July 15, 2021  U.S. Department of Education Approves Utah’s Plan for Use of American Rescue Plan Funds to Support K-12 Schools and Students, Distributes Remaining $205 Million  
On Wednesday, July 7, the U.S. Department of Education  (Department) announced the approval of Utah's American Rescue Plan  Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) plans and  distributed remaining ARP ESSER funds to them.
  **Tags:**UtahAmerican Rescue PlanPress Releases

## How Do I Find...?

                      - Student loans, forgiveness
                      - Higher Education Rulemaking
                      - College accreditation
                      - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
                      - FERPA
                      - FAFSA
                      - 1098, tax forms
                      - More...

## Information About...

                      - Elevating Teaching
                      - Early Learning
                      - Engage Every Student
                      - Unlocking Career Success
                      - Cybersecurity

----

*Our mission* is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.

          - Student Loans
          - Repaying Loans
          - Defaulted Loans
          - Loan Forgiveness
          - Loan Servicers
          - Grants & Programs
          - Apply for Pell Grants
          - Grants Forecast
          - Apply for a Grant

          - Laws & Guidance
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - Civil Rights
          - IDEA Website
          - Data & Research
          - Education Statistics
          - Postsecondary Education Data
          - ED Data Express
          - Nation's Report Card
          - What Works Clearinghouse
          - Open Data Platform
          - COVID Relief Data

          - About Us
          - Contact Us
          - ED Offices
          - Jobs
          - Press Releases
          - FAQs
          - Recursos en español
          - Budget, Performance
          - Privacy Program
          - Homeroom Blog

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information Quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-19-00126-CR

___________________________

On Appeal from the 432nd District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1522625D

Before Gabriel, Kerr, and Bassel, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Bassel

WILLIAM PAUL DODD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant William Paul Dodd pleaded guilty, without a plea-bargain agreement, 

to the offense of robbery. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 29.02. The trial court accepted 

Dodd’s plea and ordered the preparation of a presentence-investigation report (PSI). 

After reviewing the PSI and hearing evidence during the sentencing hearing, the trial 

court found Dodd guilty of robbery and sentenced him to ten years’ confinement. In 

his sole issue, Dodd argues that his ten-year sentence is grossly disproportionate.

Dodd did not object to his sentence when the trial court imposed it and did not 

raise the complaint in a motion for new trial or other post-trial motion. This type of

claim must be raised at the trial court level to preserve it for appellate review. See 

Banister v. State, 551 S.W.3d 768, 769 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2017, no pet.); Pollock v. 

State, 405 S.W.3d 396, 405–06 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2013, no pet.); Kim v. State, 

283 S.W.3d 473, 475 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2009, pet. ref’d); cf. Burt v. State, 396 

S.W.3d 574, 577 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (“A sentencing issue may be preserved by 

objecting at the punishment hearing[] or when the sentence is pronounced.”). 

Because Dodd forfeited his complaint by not objecting to his sentence in the trial 

court, we overrule his sole issue.

1

 1

Even if we were to reach the merits of Dodd’s disproportionate-sentence 

complaint, his punishment is within the statutory limits for the offense. See Tex. 

Penal Code Ann. § 12.33 (providing that a second-degree felony is punishable by two 

to twenty years in prison and by a fine of up to $10,000), § 29.02(b) (providing that 

robbery is a second-degree felony). Punishment that is imposed within the statutory 

limits and based upon the sentencer’s informed normative judgment is generally not 
3

Having overruled Dodd’s sole issue, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

/s/ Dabney Bassel

Dabney Bassel

Justice

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: December 31, 2019

 

subject to challenge for excessiveness except in “exceedingly rare” situations. Kim, 

283 S.W.3d at 475–76 (quoting Ex parte Chavez, 213 S.W.3d 320, 323–24 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2006)).
EAC Decision on the Interpretation of Audio Presentation Volume 

Levels 2013-02

Date: 

May 15, 2013 

Question: 

Should the default audio presentation volume for the voting system be raised to a higher dB? 

Section of Guidelines: 

2005 VVSG Volume 1 Section 3.2.2.2.c.v

Discussion: 

Section 3.2.2.2.c.v of the 2005 VVSG states: 

3.2.2.2.c. All voting stations that provide audio presentation of the ballot shall conform to the 

following requirements:

v. The voting machine shall set the initial volume for each voter between 40 and 50 dB SPL.

Over the years, manufacturers, VSTLs, election officials and EAC staff have noted and discussed the 

fact that this default volume level is too low. There are concerns that voter’s trying to use audio 

features will not be able to hear the introductory message or, that due to low volume, users may 

assume that the audio features are not working or are unavailable. 

Conclusion: 

The EAC agrees with the concerns cited by all stakeholders and has experienced the issue while 

witnessing state certification testing. To remedy the issues described, the EAC interprets that 

Section 3.2.2.2.c. v. identifies a minimum initial volume for any EAC certified voting system. This 

minimum will be examined by EAC VSTLs during testing, but is not the required default audio 

setting.

Additionally, Section 3.2.2.2.c.viii of the 2005 VVSG states: 

3.2.2.2.c. All voting stations that provide audio presentation of the ballot shall conform to the 

following requirements:

viii. The audio presentation of verbal information should be readily comprehensible by voters 

who have normal hearing and are proficient in the language. This includes such

characteristics as proper enunciation, normal intonation, appropriate rate of speech, and low

background noise. Candidate names should be pronounced as the candidate intends. 
To ensure the audio presentation is comprehensible, the EAC recommends that the default volume

for each audio voting session is between 60 and 70 dB SPL.

Effective Date: 

Effective for all systems without an approved test report.
# Official Journal C 327/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.327.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 327 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5526 October 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.327.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 327

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5526 October 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| 2012/C 327/01 | Consolidated version of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community | 1 |
| 2012/C 327/02 | | s2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

2012/C 327/01

Consolidated version of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community

1

2012/C 327/02

s2

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Total Polling Locations:

Election Day:7 179 

Early Voting:8 8 

Mail Ballots Transmitted10 Mail Ballots Returned11

89,540 85,627 (95.6% of 

transmitted) 

Mail Ballots Counted12 Mail Ballots Rejected13

85,454 (99.8% of 

returned)

173 (0.2% of returned) 

Mail Voting Policies 

No excuse is required for mail voting14

Does not conduct all-mail elections15

No permanent absentee voting list16

EAVS Jurisdictions

23 

Total Registered Voters as of 

Nov. 3, 20201

303,049 

Registration Forms Received2*

86,021 

Total Confirmation Notices Sent3*

-- 

2020 EAVS Data Brief: Wyoming

 Voter Registration

0.0%

0.0%

0.2%

4.7%

95.1%

Online

Motor Vehicle Dept.

Other

Mail, Email, Fax

In-Person

Source of Registration Applications4

 Voter Turnout  Election Technology

In-Person 

Election 

Day Voters 

135,426

48.6%

Mail Voters 

85,454

30.7%

In-Person 

Early Voters 

55,903

20.1%

Other Mode 

1,720

0.6%

Voters Participating By Mode5

23 23

3

0 0 0

Ballot

Marking

Device

Scanner Electronic

Poll

Books

DRE w/o

VVPAT

DRE with

VVPAT

Hand

Count

Technology Used by Jurisdictions9

 Mail Balloting

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at www.eac.gov. 

The data shown are certified as final by state election authorities. 

Responses of “Does not apply,” “Data not available, ” and “Valid 

skip” are shown as zeroes or dashes. Percentages may not sum 

to 100% because of missing data or rounding. 

* Close of registration for 2018 

general election to close of 

registration for 2020 general 

election. 

1 A1a of EAVS. 

2 A3a of EAVS. 

3 A8a of EAVS. 

4 Mail, Email, Fax is A4a. InPerson is A4b. Online is A4c. 

Motor Vehicle Dept. is A4d. 

Other is the sum of A4e–A4l. 

Denominator is A3a. 

5 In-Person Election Day Voters 

is F1b. Mail Voters is F1d+F1g. 

In-Person Early Voters is F1f. 

Other Mode is F1c+F1e+F1h. 

Denominator is sum of F1b–

F1h. 

6 F1a of EAVS. Denominator 

is citizen voting age 

population (CVAP). 

7 D3a of EAVS. 

8 D4a of EAVS. 

9 F3a–d, F5a, F6a, F7a, F8a,

and F11a of EAVS. 

10 C1a of EAVS. 

11 C1b of EAVS. 

12 C3a of EAVS. 

13 C4a of EAVS. 

14Q17 of Policy Survey. 

15 Q18 and Q18a of Policy 

Survey. 

16 Q19 of Policy Survey. 

Turnout 

64.0%

6