alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8690 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8690

 To direct the Secretary of Defense to compensate members of the Armed 
Forces for certain taxes deferred pursuant to Internal Revenue Service 
                            Notice 2020-65.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 27, 2020

 Mr. Hastings introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Ways 
 and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Defense to compensate members of the Armed 
Forces for certain taxes deferred pursuant to Internal Revenue Service 
                            Notice 2020-65.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Armed Forces Deferred Tax Relief 
Act''.

SEC. 2. COMPENSATION OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES FOR CERTAIN TAXES 
              DEFERRED PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE NOTICE 
              2020-65.

    In the case of a member of the Armed Forces whose taxes were 
deferred pursuant to Internal Revenue Service Notice 2020-65, if such 
deferred taxes are withheld by the Secretary of Defense during the 
period beginning on January 1, 2021, and ending on April 30, 2021, the 
Secretary shall (contemporaneous with such withholding) make a payment 
to such member in an amount equal to the deferred tax so withheld. Any 
payment under this section shall be excluded from gross income of the 
member and exempt from taxation under any provision of Federal law.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Andrew
Kang, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2015-1
(the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on
my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and
their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I
have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.



By:

/s/ Andrew KangName:

Andrew KangTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerSantander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as
Depositor(senior officer in charge of securitization ofthe depositor)Date:

March 30, 2017
#### KNAUF INSULATION, INC., Knauf Insulation SPRL, Appellants v. JOHNS MANVILLE CORPORATION, Johns Manville, Inc., Appellees

2017-1433

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

January 16, 2018

Joshua Paul Larsen, Barnes *&*Thorn-burg LLP, Indianapolis, IN, argued for appellants. Aso represented by James Sweeney.

Kristopher L. Reed, Kilpatrick Townsend *&*Stockton LLP, Denver, CO, argued for appellees. Aso represented by Darin James Gibby, David E. Sipiora.

(Moore, Wallach, and Stoll, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
# Special Education

- U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights Resolves Restraint and Seclusion Compliance Review of Spectrum Academy in Utah Today, the U.S.
- U.S. Education Secretary Issues Statement on Passing of Disability Rights Leader Judy Heumann Today,  U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona issued the following statement on  the passing of Disability Rights Leader Judy Heumann:
PETITION FOR EXTENTION OF EXEMPTION 9576C FROM CERTAIN PROVISIONS 

OF 14 CFR PART 91.411(b) and 91.413(c) FOR AMERIFLIGHT, LLC 

This petition follows the requirements for inclusion in such 

documents set forth in the order presented in 14CFR Part 11.81 

Your name and mailing address and, if you wish, other contact information such as a fax 

number, telephone number, or e-mail address 

Mr. Andrew Lotter 

Senior Vice President of Flight Operations 

Ameriflight, LLC 

1515 West 20th Street 

PO Box 612763 

Dallas, TX 75261 

Telephone – 877-456-8654 Ext. 76223 

Email – alotter@ameriflight.com 

The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek an exemption

Ameriflight seeks a renewal of Exemption 9576C for the following regulations: 

 14 CFR Part 91.411(b) 

 14 CFR Part 91.413(c) 

The reasons why granting your request would be in the public interest; that is, how it 

would benefit the public as a whole 

Nothing has changed since the last renewal for this exemption and it still remains valid 

and is in the public interest. 

The reasons why granting the exemption would not adversely affect safety, or how the 

exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from 

which you seek the exemption

Ameriflight continues to provide an equivalent level of safety utilizing the Ameriflight 

approved aircraft inspection program based on the continuous aircraft maintenance 

program (CAMP). 

 If you want to exercise the privileges of your exemption outside the United States, the 

reason why you need to do

No, Ameriflight will not perform any of this work outside the United States/US Territories. 

Sincerely, 

Andrew Lotter 

Senior Vice President 

Flight Operations
EX-10.19



 Exhibit 10.19 





 
 October 12, 2010 

Mr. Rob Frankfurt 
  

	 	Re:	Board Membership 

 Dear Rob: 

We are pleased to offer you a position as a member of our Board of Managers (the “Board”) of Mercury Payment Systems LLC
(“Mercury”). This letter outlines the compensation arrangements for your service on our Board. 
 1. Term of
Service; Board Meetings. You will serve on the Board until you either choose to resign or are removed in accordance with Mercury’s governing documents. You will be expected to attend (in person or telephonically) all meetings of the Board
and any Board committee on which you serve. Your term of service will begin on November 1, 2010 (the “Effective Date”). 

2. Equity Compensation. In connection with your appointment to our Board, you will receive a one-time up front grant of 41,250
options to purchase Class C Units of Mercury at an exercise price of $6.82 per unit, pursuant to the attached option agreement between you and Mercury (the “Option Agreement”). 

3. Fees, Expenses, and Insurance. You will receive a $12,500 annual fee for each 12-month period that you serve as a member of
the Board, payable, in cash, in quarterly installments in arrears on or about the 1st day of the first month of each calendar quarter (pro-rated for any portion of a calendar quarter during which you commenced or terminated service as a member). If
required to travel in connection with any Board or committee meeting or any other approved related business, you will be reimbursed for your reasonable travel, meal and lodging expenses pursuant to our expense reimbursement policy in effect from
time to time. In addition, you will be covered by our director and officer insurance policy and fully indemnified for all of your Board service in accordance with Mercury’s governing documents. 

4. Miscellaneous. Please note that you will have full responsibility, and Mercury shall have no responsibility, for satisfying
any liability for any federal, state or local income or other taxes required by law to be paid with respect to any compensation paid hereunder (including pursuant to any Option Agreement) that you receive from Mercury. This letter, along with the
attached Confidentiality Agreement and Option Agreement, supersedes any prior agreements and understandings (including verbal agreements) between you and Mercury and/or its affiliates regarding the terms and conditions of your service as a member of
the Board. 
 10 Burnett Court, Suite 300 — Durango, Colorado, 81301 — 800-846-4472 — Fax: 970-247-8951 — www.mercurypay.com 







 We greatly appreciate your willingness to serve on our Board and look forward to a long and
productive relationship. Please feel free to contact my office if you have any questions regarding these arrangements and confirm your acceptance of the terms of this offer letter by signing below and returning a copy to the undersigned. 

 

	
	Best regards,
	
	 /s/ Matt Taylor

	Matt Taylor, CEO


  

	
	Accepted and agreed
	
	 /s/ Robert Frankfurt

	Mr. Rob Frankfurt
	
	Date: 10/18/10


  
 2
# C_2021329EN.01003201.xml

| 16.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/32

---

Action brought on 19 June 2021 — Ryanair v Commission

(Case T-340/21)

(2021/C 329/42)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ryanair DAC (Swords, Ireland) (represented by: E. Vahida, F.-C. Laprévote, V. Blanc, S. Rating and I.-G. Metaxas-Maranghidis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the defendant’s decision of 23 December 2020 on State aid SA.59462 (2020/N) — Greece — COVID-19: Damage compensation for Aegean Airlines (1); and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the defendant’s decision of 23 December 2020 on State aid SA.59462 (2020/N) — Greece — COVID-19: Damage compensation for Aegean Airlines (1); and

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging that the defendant misapplied Article 107(2)(b) TFEU and committed a manifest error of assessment in its review of the proportionality of the aid to the damage caused by the COVID-19 crisis. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging that the defendant misapplied Article 107(2)(b) TFEU and committed a manifest error of assessment in its review of the proportionality of the aid to the damage caused by the COVID-19 crisis.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging that the contested decision violates specific provisions of the TFEU, the general principles of European law that have underpinned the liberalisation of air transport in the EU since the late 1980s (i.e., non-discrimination, free provision of services and free establishment) and Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 (2). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging that the contested decision violates specific provisions of the TFEU, the general principles of European law that have underpinned the liberalisation of air transport in the EU since the late 1980s (i.e., non-discrimination, free provision of services and free establishment) and Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 (2).

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging that the defendant failed to initiate a formal investigation procedure despite serious difficulties and violated the applicant’s procedural rights. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging that the defendant failed to initiate a formal investigation procedure despite serious difficulties and violated the applicant’s procedural rights.

| 4. | Fourth plea in law, alleging that the defendant violated its duty to state reasons. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Fourth plea in law, alleging that the defendant violated its duty to state reasons.

---

(1)  OJ 2021 C 122, p. 15 and 16.

(2)  Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community (Recast) (Text with EEA relevance) (OJ 2008 L 293, p. 3–20).

---
EXHIBIT  32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned, Stephen M. Siedow, the Chief Executive Officer, President
and Chief Financial Officer of EQUICAP, INC. (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY, that:

     1.   The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
          September 30, 2004 (the "Report"), fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
          and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement
this 14th day of October, 2004.


                                            By:  /s/  Stephen M. Siedow
                                               --------------------------------
                                                      Stephen M. Siedow
                                                      Chief Executive Officer,
                                                      President and
                                                      Chief Financial Officer


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to EQUICAP, INC. and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or it staff upon request.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                                US ONCOLOGY, INC.

STATEMENT UNDER OATH OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER REGARDING
FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES RELATING TO EXCHANGE ACT FILINGS
--------------------------------------------------------


I, R. Dale Ross, Chief Executive Officer of US Oncology, Inc., state and attest
that:

1.   To the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the covered reports of
     US Oncology, Inc., and, except as corrected or supplemented in a subsequent
     covered report:

     o    no covered report contained an untrue statement of a material fact as
          of the end of the period covered by such report (or in the case of a
          report on Form 8-K or definitive proxy materials, as of the date on
          which it was filed); and

     o    no covered report omitted to state a material fact necessary to make
          the statements in the covered report, in light of the circumstances
          under which they were made, not misleading as of the end of the period
          covered by such report (or in the case of a report on Form 8-K or
          definitive proxy materials, as of the date on which it was filed).

2.   I have reviewed the contents of this statement with the Company's audit
     committee.

3.   In this statement under oath, each of the following, if filed on or before
     the date of this statement, is a "covered report":

     o    2001 10-K of US Oncology, Inc.;

     o    all reports on Form 10-Q, all reports on Form 8-K and all definitive
          proxy materials of US Oncology, Inc. filed with the Commission
          subsequent to the filing of the Form 10-K identified above; and

     o    any amendments to any of the foregoing.


/s/ R. Dale Ross                                        Date:  August 13, 2002
---------------------------------------------
                       R. Dale Ross
                  Chief Executive Officer

STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF HARRIS

SUBSCRIBED AND sworn to before me on this 13th day of August, 2002.

                                    /s/ Alice Cole Wright
                                    Notary Public

                                    My Commission Expires: April 24, 2005

(seal)
# Amtsblatt C 114A/28.

| | ISSN 1977-088X |
| --- | --- |
| Amtsblatt
  der Europäischen Union | C 114A |
| | |
| Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache | Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen | 61. Jahrgang28. März 2018 |

ISSN 1977-088X

Amtsblatt

der Europäischen Union

C 114A

Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache

Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen

61. Jahrgang28. März 2018

---

| Informationsnummer | Inhalt | Seite |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Bekanntmachungen |
| | VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN |
| | Europäisches Parlament |
| 2018/C 114 A/01 | Auswahlverfahren PE/199/S — Bediensteter auf Zeit — Direktionsreferent (AD 5) — Eignungsliste | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Inhalt

Seite

V   Bekanntmachungen

VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN

Europäisches Parlament

2018/C 114 A/01

Auswahlverfahren PE/199/S — Bediensteter auf Zeit — Direktionsreferent (AD 5) — Eignungsliste

1

---

| DE | |
| --- | --- |

DE

---

V Bekanntmachungen

VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN

Europäisches Parlament

| 28.3.2018 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | CA 114/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2018

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

CA 114/1

---

AUSWAHLVERFAHREN PE/199/S

Bediensteter auf Zeit — Direktionsreferent (AD 5)

EIGNUNGSLISTE

(2018/C 114 A/01)

| 1. | FISCHER, Jessica Isabell |
| --- | --- |

1.

FISCHER, Jessica Isabell

| 2. | LEMAIRE, Cléo |
| --- | --- |

2.

LEMAIRE, Cléo

| 3. | COURTADE, Christelle |
| --- | --- |

3.

COURTADE, Christelle

Die Eignungsliste gilt bis zum 31. Dezember 2020.

---
### NUMBE R 1 3 - 0 7 - 0 0 7 6 0 - CR 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG

_______________________________________________________ EU STA C I O HER N A N D EZ A / K /A E S T A C I O H E R N A N D E Z , A p p e l l a n t, v . TH E S TA TE O F TE XA S, A ppel l ee.

_______________________________________ ________________

O n A p p e a l fro m th e 3 6 th D i s tri c t C o u rt ofSan P at r i ci o C oun t y, Texa s.

_______________________________________________________



## ME MOR A N D U M OP I N I ON B ef or e C hi ef

Just i ce Val dez and Just i ces Ro dr i guez and G ar za M em or andu m O pi ni on P erC ur i am Ap p e ll a n t, Eust acio Herna nde za/k/a Estacio Herna nde z , atte mp ts to ap pea l his conv icti on for dr iv ing under the influ ence. The tr ial courthas ce rt ified thatthi s “ is a pl eabarg ain ca se, and the d efendant has N O r ig ht of appea l, ” and “the defendant has w aiv ed the rig ht of

app eal.” See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25 .2(a)(2).2

On Dece mb er 31, 2 007 , this Court no tif ied ap pellan t’s coun sel of t h e t rial court’s cer ti ficat ion and ord ered counse l to: (1 ) rev iew the re cord; (2) determi ne w hether appel lan t has a rig ht to app eal; a nd (3) forw ard to th is Cou rt , by l etter , cou nsel ’s findi ng s a s t o w hether appel lan t has a ri g ht to appeal , or , alt er nati v ely , adv is e thi s Cou rtas to the ex is tenc e of any

amended cer

ti ficat ion

. On Jan uary 30, 200 8, cou nsel f iled a lette r brief w ith this Court. Cou nsel’s respo nse does not e sta bli sh that the c erti ficat ion cu rrentl y on fil e w it h thi s Cou rt is inc or re ct or that appel lan t ot her

w is e has a r ig ht t o appea l. The Tex as Rul es of Appel lat e Proc edure prov ide that an appeal mustbe d is mis sed if the trial court’s certif ication doe s not sho w thatthe d e fe n dan t has th e rig ht of app eal. T EX . R. A PP . P. 25. 2(d); se e T EX . R. A PP . P. 37 .1, 4 4.3 , 44. 4. Acco rdingly , this app eal is DI SM ISSE D. An y

pendi ng moti ons are deni ed as moot.

PERC UR IAM

Do not p ubl is h. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 47 .2(b). Me moran dum Opi nio n del iv ered and fil ed th is the 13 day of Ma rc h, 20 08. th
Errata Note: 2018 EAVS Comprehensive Report and Accompanying Datasets 

February 18, 2020 

Hawaii requested to make corrections to its data submissions for the 2018 EAVS following the initial 

publication of the datasets on June 27, 2019 and the subsequent publication of Version 1.1 on October 

22, 2019. These corrections are documented below. 

2018 Election Administration and Voting Survey Dataset 

The corrections listed below are reflected in Version 1.2 of the 2018 EAVS dataset released on February 

18, 2020. 

State Local Jurisdiction Correction 

Former C3a New C3a 

Hawaii Hawaii County 1,867 28,884 

Hawaii Honolulu County 8,712 132,334 

Hawaii Kauai County 815 11,296 

Hawaii Maui County 1,222 22,723
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8673 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8673

  To assign a resident inspector to certain commercial nuclear power 
 plants to conduct inspections of decommissioning activities and spent 
                   nuclear fuel transfer activities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 23, 2020

   Mr. Levin of California (for himself, Mr. Rouda, and Ms. Porter) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To assign a resident inspector to certain commercial nuclear power 
 plants to conduct inspections of decommissioning activities and spent 
                   nuclear fuel transfer activities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Increasing Nuclear Safety Protocols 
for Extended Canister Transfers Act'' or the ``INSPECT Act''.

SEC. 2. INSPECTION OF DECOMMISSIONING ACTIVITY AND SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL 
              TRANSFER ACTIVITY.

    (a) In General.--The Chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission 
shall assign, for the duration described in subsection (b), a resident 
inspector to each commercial nuclear power plant that has permanently 
ceased operation to conduct inspections of decommissioning activities 
and spent nuclear fuel transfer activities of the commercial nuclear 
power plant.
    (b) Duration Described.--The duration described in this subsection 
is the period of time it takes to transfer all spent nuclear fuel from 
the spent fuel pools of the commercial nuclear power plant.
    (c) Reassignment.--If there are no decommissioning activities or 
spent nuclear fuel transfer activities at the commercial nuclear power 
plant to which a resident inspector is assigned under subsection (a), 
the Chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission may assign such 
resident inspector to a different commercial nuclear power plant.
                                 <all>
```