alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 68 (Friday, April 8, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20858-20859]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07508]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[FR ID 80999]


Radio Broadcasting Services; AM or FM Proposals To Change the 
Community of License

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: The agency must receive comments on or before June 7, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, 
Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rolanda F. Smith, 202-418-2054.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following applicants filed AM or FM 
proposals to change the community of license: CHRISTOPHER W JOHNSON, 
WAMI(AM); Fac. ID No. 66212, FROM OPP, AL, TO JACKSON'S GAP, AL, File 
No. BP-20220318AAI; IHM LICENSES, LLC, KVDU(FM), Fac. ID No. 34528, 
FROM HOUMA, LA, TO GONZALES, LA, File No. 0000187347; KENNEDY 
BROADCASTING, LLC, NEW(FM), Fac. ID No. 762447, FROM NEW ALBANY, MS, TO 
BRUCE, MS, File No. 0000186755; QBS BROADCASTING, LLC, WBQO(FM), Fac. 
ID No. 191581, FROM ST. SIMONS ISLAND, GA, TO DARIEN, GA, File No. 
0000185843; CALL COMMUNICATIONS GROUP,

[[Page 20859]]

INC., WMFL(FM), Fac. ID No. 61088, FROM FLORIDA CITY, FL, TO PALMETTO 
BAY, FL, File No. 0000186693; and GOLDEN ISLES BROADCASTING, LLC, 
WSSI(FM), Fac. ID. No. 36929, FROM DARIEN, GA, TO ST. SIMONS ISLAND, 
GA, File No. 0000185840. The full text of these applications is 
available electronically via the Media Bureau's Consolidated Data Base 
System, https://licensing.fcc.gov/prod/cdbs/pubacc/prod/app_sear.htm or 
Licensing and Management System (LMS), https://apps2int.fcc.gov/dataentry/public/tv/publicAppSearch.html.

Federal Communications Commission.
Nazifa Sawez,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2022-07508 Filed 4-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 62 (Tuesday, April 1, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18258-18259]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-07255]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Delaware Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and

[[Page 18259]]

regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning meeting of 
the Delaware Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 10:30 
a.m. (EDT) Thursday, April 24, 2014, at the offices of Young Conaway 
Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, located at 1000 N. King Street, Wilmington, DE 
19801. The purpose of the planning meeting is to discuss and select the 
topic for the committee's civil rights project.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the regional office by Monday, May 26, 
2014. Comments may be mailed to the Eastern Regional Office, U.S. 
Commission on Civil Rights, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 1150, 
Washington, DC 20425, faxed to (202) 376-7548, or emailed to Evelyn 
Bohor at ero@usccr.gov. Persons who desire additional information may 
contact the Eastern Regional Office at 202-376-7533.
    Persons needing accessibility services should contact the Eastern 
Regional Office at least 10 working days before the scheduled date of 
the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above 
phone number, email or street address.
    The meetings will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated on March 26, 2014.
David Mussatt,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2014-07255 Filed 3-31-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
Custom er Service Hotline: 1 - 800 - 438 - 2474 UNITED STA

TES ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTION A GENCY

REGION III 1650 A rch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 - 2029

Oct o ber 29 , 2010 Mr. David K. Paylor, Director Virginia Department of Environmental Quality P.O. Box 1105 Richm ond, Virginia 23218 Dear Mr. Paylor : On September 29 , 2010, U.S. E nvironmental P rotection A gency (EPA) received a revision to the Virginia State I mplementation Plan (SI P) from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality which moves Virginia’s regul ation for open burning from 9VAC5, Chapter 4 0 , Part I I, Article 40 (repealed) to 9VAC5, Chapter 130 (added). EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically

complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a Direct Final Rulemaking Notic e action. If members of y our staff have any questions, they

may direct them to Mr. Harold A. Frankford at (215) 814

- 2108

. He is the principal contact for this rulemaking. Sincerely , /s/ Diana Esher , Director A ir Protection Division
Exhibit 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of ALARIS Medical Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, William C. Bopp, Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|April 27, 2004 /s/ WILLIAM C. BOPP

William C. BoppSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  |
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANILA MALANI, Petitioner,
v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 05-73630 Agency No. A095-882-703
MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted August 5, 2013 Pasadena, California Before: TALLMAN, CLIFTON, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges. Anila Malani, a native and citizen of Albania, petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals adopting and affirming an immigration judge’s denial of her appli cations for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 

# FILED
AUG 07 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 thCir. R. 36-3.Malani argues that we have jurisdiction to review the Board’s finding that she failed to timely file her asylum application as required by 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2)(B) because of the immigration judge’s conceded error in finding that she filed her application on July 27, 2002, rather than June 27, 2002, the date stamped on her application. Even were we to hold that we have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D), and that Malani has met her burden of demonstrating by clear and convincing ev idence that she filed her application within one year of her arrival in the United States, Malani’s asylum claim fails on the merits because substantial evidence supports the immigration judge’s adverse credibility finding. The immigration judge provided “specifi c cogent reason[s]” for his adverse credibility finding, and Malani has ther efore failed to demonstrate that “any reasonable factfinder would necessarily conc lude that [she] is eligible for relief from deportation.” Chebchoub v. INS , 257 F.3d 1038, 1042–43 (9th Cir. 2001). Malani’s petition for review of the advers e credibility finding as it relates to her asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT claims is denied. Malani asserts that counsel at her removal hearing provided ineffective assistance of counsel. We decline to a ddress Malani’s argument because she has not raised it before the Board, see Martinez-Zelaya v. INS , 841 F.2d 294, 296 (9th
2Cir. 1988), nor has she complied with the procedural requirements established by the Board in Matter of Lozada , 19 I. & N. Dec. 637 (BIA 1988). Counsel’s alleged ineffective assistance is not “obvious a nd undisputed on the face of the record,” therefore compliance with Matter of Lozada ’s procedural requirements is not excused and we lack jurisdiction to review it. See Reyes v. Ashcroft , 358 F.3d 592, 596–97 (9th Cir. 2004). Petition DENIED in part and DISMISSED in part.

3
EXHIBIT 32.2





Certification Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Telestone Technologies Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Yu Xiaoli, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated: August 15, 2011





By:
/s/ Yu XiaoliName:
Yu XiaoliTitle:
Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
U.S. ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION

633 3rd St. NW, Suite 200

Washington, DC 20001

EAC | Helping America Vote EAC.gov page 1

In the below advisory issued on October 8, the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) used the term 

“vulnerability” to describe the issue regarding the voting system configuration. The EAC used this term 

based on how the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) defines “vulnerability” as a

"(w)eakness in an information system, system security procedures, internal controls, or implementation 

that could be exploited or triggered by a threat source. Note: The term weakness is synonymous for 

deficiency. Weakness may result in security and/or privacy risks." The issue discussed below describes a 

potential privacy risk and does not represent a threat to voting systems that could impact the 

integrity or availability of the machine software or of any election results. Dominion submitted a 

system modification to the EAC that includes an improvement addressing this issue and it is currently 

undergoing testing at an independent accredited laboratory.

Colleagues:

The EAC has been contacted by a security researcher with a coordinated vulnerability disclosure (CVD), 

about a potential vulnerability with a Dominion voting system configuration, specifically configurations 

that utilize the ImageCast Precinct (ICP) or ImageCast Evolution (ICE) tabulators. We are sending this 

advisory as you may use an affected configuration.

The EAC is currently working through our processes with the manufacturer and our partners at CISA.

The issue affects the file naming convention used for ballot images produced by these configurations. The 

vulnerability does not impact the integrity of the machine software or of any election results. Exploitation 

by a malicious actor could reveal the order in which ballots were cast and, potentially, how a particular 

voter voted if the ballot image files with unchanged file names are correlated with other data indicating 

when and where a ballot was cast.

If you have not already been contacted by or individually reached out to Dominion on this issue and 

believe you may be affected, please contact them for information on whether your systems are impacted 

and any mitigation steps that may be available.

This information has not yet been released publicly. The EAC has not been provided with details on when 

the security researcher plans to publicly release this information, but we have reason to believe it will be 

released soon.

Mark A. Robbins

Interim Executive Director

U.S. Election Assistance Commission
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF LABORATORY SPECIALISTS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         643,413
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,595,007
<ALLOWANCES>                                   627,499
<INVENTORY>                                    116,143
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,209,457
<PP&E>                                       2,744,502
<DEPRECIATION>                                 954,510
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,143,307
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,433,953
<BONDS>                                      2,518,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,313
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,880,941
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,143,307
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,587,222
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,186,084
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                20,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,876
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                407,624
<INCOME-TAX>                                   173,621
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            234,003
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   234,003
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            52151
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        125130
<OTHER-SE>                                    (177084)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 52151
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (52151)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (52151)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.005)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.005)
        

</TABLE>
#### Carlton Charles PENRIGHT, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas

NO. PD-1671-15

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Delivered: September 20, 2017

Jani Maselli Wood, Assistant Public Defender, Harris County, Houston, for Appellant.

Jessica Akins, Assistant District Attorney, Houston, Stacey Soule, State’s Attorney, Austin, for the State.

Keller, P.J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court

in which Keasler, Hervey, Alcala, Richardson, Keel, and Walker, JJ. joined.

The court of appeals rejected a constitutional challenge to the consolidated fee statute, Texas Local Government Code § 133.102.1 In his petition for discretionary review, appellant complains that the court of appeals’s decision “failed to explain how the comprehensive rehabilitation fee is a legitimate criminal justice purpose.” In *Salinas v. State,*we held that the portions of the consolidated fee statute that were allocated to “comprehensive rehabilitation” and “abused children’s counseling” were unconstitutional in violation of the Separation of Powers provision of the Texas Constitution.2 We further held that our Separation of Powers holding would apply retroactively only to a “defendant who has raised the appropriate claim in a petition for discretionary review before the date of this opinion, if that petition is still pending on the date of this opinion and if the claim would otherwise *917be properly before us on discretionary review.” 3

Appellant’s challenge to the “comprehensive rehabilitation” portion of the consolidated fee was raised before *Salinas*was handed down, was pending on discretionary review at the time *Salinas*was handed down, and was otherwise properly before us on discretionary review.4 The portion of the fee allocated to “comprehensive rehabilitation” was 9.8218 percent.5 That percentage of the fee in appellant’s case is $13.06. Subtracting that amount from the $133 fee yields a fee of $119.94. Consequently, we modify the trial court’s judgment to change the $133 consolidated fee to $119.94.

Yeary, J., filed a dissenting opinion.

Newell, J., concurred.

1

. *Penright v. State,*477 S.W.3d 494, 495-500 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2015).

2

. 523 S.W.3d 103, 106-11 (Tex. Crim. App. 2017).

3

. *Id.*at 113. We held that our Separation of Powers holding would otherwise "apply prospectively to trials that end after the date the mandate in [Salinas] issues.” *Id.*We further explained, however, that our Separation of Powers holding would not apply prospectively if the legislature redirected the funds in question to a legitimate criminal justice purpose before mandate in *Salinas*issued. *Id.*at 113 n.54.

4

. Appellant’s petition for discretionary review did not challenge the "abused children’s counseling” portion of the consolidated fee.

5

. *See id.*at 107 (quoting then existing Tex. Local Gov’t Code § 133.102(e)(6)).

Yeary, J.,

filed a dissenting opinion.

I dissent for the reasons articulated in my dissenting opinion in *Salinas v. State,*523 S.W.3d 103 (Tex. Crim. App. 2017).
**Exhibit
      32** **.1**




**CERTIFICATIONS
      UNDER SECTION 906**




Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
      and
      (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of Tutogen Medical Inc., a Florida corporation (the
      "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:




The
      Quarterly Report for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the "Form 10-Q") of the
      Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form
      10-Q
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of the Company.







Dated:
                August 14, 2007/s/
                Guy L. MayerGuy
                L. MayerChief
                Executive OfficerDated:
                August 14, 2007/s/
                L. Robert Johnston, Jr.L.
                Robert Johnston, Jr.Chief
                Financial Officer







A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Total Polling Locations:

Election Day:7 2,454 

Early Voting:8 133 

Mail Ballots Transmitted10 Mail Ballots Returned11

1,099,502 990,198 (90.1% of 

transmitted) 

Mail Ballots Counted12 Mail Ballots Rejected13

983,907 (99.4% of 

returned)

6,291 (0.6% of 

returned) 

Mail Voting Policies 

No excuse is required for mail voting14

Does not conduct all-mail elections15

Any voter can register as permanent absentee16

EAVS Jurisdictions

133 

Total Registered Voters as of 

Nov. 3, 20201

5,975,561 

Registration Forms Received2*

3,880,532 

Total Confirmation Notices Sent3*

189,162 

2020 EAVS Data Brief: Virginia

 Voter Registration

2.9%

3.8%

4.5%

18.4%

70.3%

In-Person

Other

Mail, Email, Fax

Online

Motor Vehicle Dept.

Source of Registration Applications4

 Voter Turnout  Election Technology

In-Person 

Election 

Day Voters 

1,657,228

36.9%

Mail Voters 

983,907

21.9%

In-Person 

Early Voters 

1,798,050

40.1%

Other Mode 

48,153

1.1%

Voters Participating By Mode5

133 133

111

0 0 0

Ballot

Marking

Device

Scanner Electronic

Poll

Books

DRE w/o

VVPAT

DRE with

VVPAT

Hand

Count

Technology Used by Jurisdictions9

 Mail Balloting

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at www.eac.gov. 

The data shown are certified as final by state election authorities. 

Responses of “Does not apply,” “Data not available, ” and “Valid 

skip” are shown as zeroes or dashes. Percentages may not sum 

to 100% because of missing data or rounding. 

* Close of registration for 2018 

general election to close of 

registration for 2020 general 

election. 

1 A1a of EAVS. 

2 A3a of EAVS. 

3 A8a of EAVS. 

4 Mail, Email, Fax is A4a. InPerson is A4b. Online is A4c. 

Motor Vehicle Dept. is A4d. 

Other is the sum of A4e–A4l. 

Denominator is A3a. 

5 In-Person Election Day Voters 

is F1b. Mail Voters is F1d+F1g. 

In-Person Early Voters is F1f. 

Other Mode is F1c+F1e+F1h. 

Denominator is sum of F1b–

F1h. 

6 F1a of EAVS. Denominator 

is citizen voting age 

population (CVAP). 

7 D3a of EAVS. 

8 D4a of EAVS. 

9 F3a–d, F5a, F6a, F7a, F8a, 

and F11a of EAVS. 

10 C1a of EAVS. 

11 C1b of EAVS. 

12 C3a of EAVS. 

13 C4a of EAVS. 

14Q17 of Policy Survey. 

15 Q18 and Q18a of Policy 

Survey. 

16 Q19 of Policy Survey. 

Turnout 

72.1%

6