alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2022 EAVS Data Brief: Nebraska EAVS Jurisdictions:

93 

 Voter Registration 

Active Reg. Voters as of Nov. 8, 20221 

1,141,470 

Reg. Forms Received2* 

427,117 

Total Confirmation Notices Sent3* 

154,016 

Voters Removed from Reg. Rolls4* 

109,749 

Source of Registration Applications5 

Motor Vehicle Dept. 46.4% 

Online 34.1% 

Mail, Email, Fax 14.9% 

In Person 4.0% 

Other 0.6% 

 Voting and Turnout 

Voters Participating By Mode6 

7 Turnout 

48.4% 

In-Person 

Election Day 

412,213 

60.4% 

Mail 

242,009

35.4% 

In-Person 

Early 

21,944 

3.2% 

Other 

6,575 

1.0% 

Total Voting Locations8: 1,072 

Total Poll Workers9: 6,909 

Election Technology 

Percentage of Jurisdictions Using...10 

100.0% 

Ballot 

Marking 

Devices 

100.0% 

Scanners 

0.0% 

DREs w/o

VVPAT 

0.0% 

DREs with 

VVPAT 

0.0% 

Electronic 

Poll 

Books 

0.0% 

Hand 

Counting 

 Mail Ballots 

• 269,285 mail ballots transmitted11 

• 90.3% of transmitted mail ballots returned by voters12 

• 99.6% of returned mail ballots counted13 

• 0.4% of returned mail ballots rejected14 

• Conducted all-mail election in some jurisdictions15 

• Allowed drop boxes16 

• Allowed ballot curing17 

 Election Audits18 

✔ Access audit 

-- Ballot design audit 

Ballot reconciliation ✔ audit 

Compliance/ -- procedural audit 

-- Eligibility audit 

-- Legal audit 

Logic and accuracy ✔ testing 

Post-election ✔ tabulation audit 

-- Other 

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at www.eac.gov 

/research-and-data/datasets-codebooks-and-surveys. 

Responses of “Does not apply,” “Data not available,” and “Valid 

skip” are shown as zeroes or dashes. Percentages may not sum 

to 100% because of missing data or rounding. 

* Close of registration for 2020 

general election to close of 

registration for 2022 general 

election. 

1 A1b of EAVS. 

2 A3a of EAVS. 

3 A8a of EAVS. 

4 A9a of EAVS. 

5 Mail, Email, Fax is A4a/A3a. 

In Person is A4b/A3a. Online is 

A4c/A3a. Motor Vehicle Dept. is 

A4d/A3a. Other is the sum of 

A4e–A4l/A3a. May not sum to 

100% because of missing data. 

6 In-Person Election Day is F1b. 

Mail is F1d+F1g. In-Person Early 

is F1f. Other is F1c+F1e+F1h. 

7 F1a of EAVS divided by citizen 

voting age population (CVAP). 

8 D2a of EAVS. 

9 D7a of EAVS. 

10 F3a–f, F5a–F9a of EAVS; 

number of jurisdictions that 

responded “Yes” divided by

number of jurisdictions in 

state/territory. 

11 C1a of EAVS. 

12 C1b/C1a of EAVS. 

13 C8a/C1b of EAVS. 

14 C9a/C1b of EAVS. 

15 Q17 and Q17a of Policy 

Survey. 

16 Q19 of Policy Survey. 

17 Q20 of Policy Survey. 

18 Q36 of Policy Survey. See 

survey questionnaire for full 

definitions of each type of 

audit.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________ THE BOEING COMPANY (SUCCESSOR TO MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION), Plaintiff-Appellant,
and GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

__________________________ 2007-5111, -5131

__________________________ Appeals from the United States Court of Federal Claims in case No. 91-CV-1204, Senior Judge Robert H. Hodges, Jr.

__________________________ Before R ADER , Chief Judge , P ROST and M OORE , Circuit Judges

. P ER C URIAM

. O R D E R The Supreme Court vacated and remanded this case to the Federal Circuit in its recent decision in GeneralBOEING v. US 2

Dynamics Corp. v. United States , 131 S. Ct. 1900 (2011), for consideration of the Government’s argument that itdoes not have an obligation to share its superior knowledge “with respect to ‘highly classified information,’” or “when (as was the case here) the agreement specifically identifies information that must be shared.” Id. at 1909- 10. In addition, on remand, we must determine whether those issues “can safely be litigated without endangering state secrets.” Id. at 1910.On June 30, 2011, the parties submitted a joint motion for entry of a scheduling order in this case for briefing of the remanded issues. The Government’s arguments, however, were never squarely addressed by the Court of Federal Claims in the first instance. In addition, the Supreme Court’s remand requires factual determinations most appropriately undertaken by the trial court. Upon consideration thereof,
I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The parties’ joint motion for entry of a scheduling order is denied.(2) We remand to the Court of Federal Claims for further proceedings consistent with the Court’s opinion in General Dynamics Corp. v. United States

.

F OR T HE C OURT

July 7, 2011

—————————— Date /s/ Jan Horbaly

—————————— Jan Horbaly ClerkBOEING v. US 3

cc: Paul M. Smith, Esq. Charles J. Cooper, Esq. Bryant G. Snee, Esq. Marcia G. Madsen, Esq.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

APC HOME HEALTH SERVICES INC.

,

Appellant

,

v.

LUCINA MARTINEZ

,

Appellee

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 8

- 00 1 71

- C V

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 7

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 2017 DCV 4119 )

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is Appellant’s emergency motion to stay litigation proceedings

and discovery pending resolution of this interlocutory appeal. The motion to stay is GRANTED.

Accordingly, the trial court is o rder ed to stay all proceedings in cause number 201 7 DCV 4119

,

s tyled APC Home Health Services, Inc. v. Lucina Martinez , pending resolution of this appeal o r

further order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1 st day of October , 20 1 8

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
Exhibit 32
                                                                      ----------

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
                 PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER (ACTING)
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Douglas Mitchell, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Simtek Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the three month period
ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Simtek Corporation.



/s/Douglas Mitchell
---------------------------------------
Douglas Mitchell
Chief Executive Officer, President and
Chief Financial Officer (acting)
August 5, 2004
#### ALLOWAY, C. v. The FRANKLIN INSTITUTE

2840 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

9/8/2017

150801092

(Philadelphia)

Reversed/Remanded
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                              20
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      20
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,042
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,076,748
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        20
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,324
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (51,324)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (51,324)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (51,324)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.02)


</TABLE>
# Az Európai Unió C 179A/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0979 |
| --- | --- |
| Az Európai Unió
  Hivatalos Lapja | C 179A |
| | |
| Magyar nyelvű kiadás | Tájékoztatások és közlemények | 61. évfolyam2018. május 25. |

ISSN 1977-0979

Az Európai Unió

Hivatalos Lapja

C 179A

Magyar nyelvű kiadás

Tájékoztatások és közlemények

61. évfolyam2018. május 25.

---

| Tartalom | Oldal |
| --- | --- |
| | Helyesbítések |
| 2018/C 179 A/01 | Helyesbítés a PE/197/S számú álláshirdetéshez ( HL C 144 A., 2018.4.25. ) | 1 |

Tartalom

Oldal

Helyesbítések

2018/C 179 A/01

Helyesbítés a PE/197/S számú álláshirdetéshez ( HL C 144 A., 2018.4.25. )

( HL C 144 A., 2018.4.25. )

1

---

| HU | |
| --- | --- |

HU

---

Helyesbítések

| 25.5.2018 | HU | Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja | CA 179/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2018

HU

Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja

CA 179/1

---

Helyesbítés a PE/197/S számú álláshirdetéshez

(
  Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja C 144 A, 2018. április 25.
  )

(2018/C 179 A/01)

1. Az 1. oldalon:

a következő szövegrész:

„Az Európai Parlament képesítéseken és vizsgákon alapuló kiválasztási eljárást indít az alkalmas jelöltek listájának összeállítása céljából, tizenegy álláshely betöltésére az alábbiak szerint:”

helyesen:

helyesen:

„Az Európai Parlament képesítéseken és vizsgákon alapuló kiválasztási eljárást indít az alkalmas jelöltek listájának összeállítása céljából, álláshelyek betöltésére az alábbiak szerint:”

2. A 2. oldalon, az A cím alatt, 1. Általános követelmények, első bekezdésében:

2. A 2. oldalon, az A cím alatt, 1. Általános követelmények, első bekezdésében:

a következő szövegrész:

a következő szövegrész:

„Az Európai Parlament a Biztonsági Főigazgatóság Helyi Segítségnyújtási, Biztonsági és Védelmi Igazgatóságán belül tizenegy ideiglenes alkalmazott személyvédelmi tisztviselő (1) (AST 3) betöltésére irányuló eljárás megindításáról határozott.”

helyesen:

helyesen:

„Az Európai Parlament a Biztonsági Főigazgatóság Helyi Segítségnyújtási, Biztonsági és Védelmi Igazgatóságán belül ideiglenes alkalmazott személyvédelmi tisztviselői álláshelyek (1) (AST 3) betöltésére irányuló eljárás megindításáról határozott.”

---

(1)  Az ebben az álláshirdetésben található, férfiakra vonatkozó utalások egyúttal a nőkre vonatkozó utalásnak is tekintendők, illetve fordítva.

1

---
F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

MAR 5 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

KAREN HANZLICEK, also known as

Karen Pearl Hanzlicek,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 97-5016

(D.C. No. 96-CR-115-BU)

(N.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT

Before KELLY, BRISCOE, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

Defendant Karen Hanzlicek appeals the district court’s order detaining her

pending trial. Detention of a defendant pending trial is governed by 18 U.S.C.

§ 3142 of the Bail Reform Act. The district court found that there is a serious

risk that the defendant will flee. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(2)(A). It also found

that no condition or combination of conditions would reasonably assure the

appearance of the defendant and the safety of the community if defendant were

released pending trial. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e). 
-2-

We review a district court’s pretrial detention order de novo as to mixed

questions of law and fact concerning the detention, accepting the district court’s

findings of historical fact which support that decision, unless they are clearly

erroneous. See United States v. Kinslow, 105 F.3d 555, 557 (10th Cir. 1997). 

Based on our review of the record and the briefs on appeal, we conclude that the

district court’s factual findings underlying its detention order are not clearly

erroneous, and that it did not err in finding that defendant posed a serious risk of

fleeing and that no condition or combination of conditions would reasonably

assure her appearance or the safety of the community if she was released. 

Accordingly, the order of the United States District Court for the Northern

District of Oklahoma detaining defendant pending trial is AFFIRMED.

Entered for the court

Mary Beck Briscoe 

Circuit Judge
No. 97-5016, United States v. Hanzlicek

KELLY, Circuit Judge, dissenting:

I dissent.
# Επίσημη Εφημερίδα C 179A/25 Μ

| | ISSN 1977-0901 |
| --- | --- |
| Επίσημη Εφημερίδα
  της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | C 179A |
| | |
| Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα | Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες | 61ό έτος25 Μαΐου 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0901

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα

της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

C 179A

Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα

Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες

61ό έτος25 Μαΐου 2018

---

| Περιεχόμενα | Σελίδα |
| --- | --- |
| | Διορθωτικά |
| 2018/C 179 A/01 | Διορθωτικό στην ανακοίνωση πρόσληψης αριθ. PE/197/S ( ΕΕ C 144 A της 25.4.2018 ) | 1 |

Περιεχόμενα

Σελίδα

Διορθωτικά

2018/C 179 A/01

Διορθωτικό στην ανακοίνωση πρόσληψης αριθ. PE/197/S ( ΕΕ C 144 A της 25.4.2018 )

( ΕΕ C 144 A της 25.4.2018 )

1

---

| EL | |
| --- | --- |

EL

---

Διορθωτικά

| 25.5.2018 | EL | Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | CA 179/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2018

EL

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

CA 179/1

---

Διορθωτικό στην ανακοίνωση πρόσληψης αριθ. PE/197/S

(
  Επίσημη Εφημερίδα C 144 A της 25ης Απριλίου 2018
  )

(2018/C 179 A/01)

Στη σελίδα 1:

αντί:

«Το Ευρωπαϊκό Κοινοβούλιο οργανώνει διαδικασία επιλογής βάσει τίτλων και δοκιμασιών για την κατάρτιση πίνακα επιτυχόντων με στόχο την πλήρωση έντεκα θέσεων»

διάβαζε:

διάβαζε:

«Το Ευρωπαϊκό Κοινοβούλιο οργανώνει διαδικασία επιλογής βάσει τίτλων και δοκιμασιών για την κατάρτιση πίνακα επιτυχόντων με στόχο την πλήρωση θέσεων».

Στη σελίδα 2, στην ενότητα Α.1, «Γενικά», πρώτο εδάφιο:

Στη σελίδα 2, στην ενότητα Α.1, «Γενικά», πρώτο εδάφιο:

αντί:

αντί:

«Το Ευρωπαϊκό Κοινοβούλιο αποφάσισε να κινήσει τη διαδικασία πλήρωσης έντεκα έκτακτων θέσεων υπαλλήλου εγγύς προστασίας (1) (AST 3) — Γενική Διεύθυνση Ασφάλειας και Προστασίας, Διεύθυνση Εσωτερικής Ασφάλειας, Συνδρομής και Προστασίας.»

διάβαζε:

διάβαζε:

«Το Ευρωπαϊκό Κοινοβούλιο αποφάσισε να κινήσει τη διαδικασία πλήρωσης έκτακτων θέσεων υπαλλήλου εγγύς προστασίας (1) (AST 3) — Γενική Διεύθυνση Ασφάλειας και Προστασίας, Διεύθυνση Εσωτερικής Ασφάλειας, Συνδρομής και Προστασίας.»

---

(1)  Στην παρούσα ανακοίνωση, οποιαδήποτε αναφορά σε πρόσωπο αρσενικού γένους νοείται επίσης ως αναφορά σε πρόσωπο θηλυκού γένους, και αντιστρόφως.

1

---
1 

U.S. ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION (EAC)

STANDARDS BOARD

NOMINATION FORM

S SUBMISSION DEADLINE IS FRIDAY, MARCH 1, 2024 by 5:00 PM (EST)

Name:

Title:

 State Election Official  Local Election Official

State: _______________________ Local Jurisdiction: ______________________ 

Party Affiliation: ___________________________________ 

 Elected Official  Appointed Official

Reason for nomination or candidate’s statement of interest:
2 

Candidate Bio (Not to exceed one page):
3 

If nominated and elected to serve as an Executive Officer of the Election Assistance 

Commission Standards Board, you or the person you nominate must commit to: 

• Fulfill the duties and responsibilities of the position during her/his term

• Uphold the Bylaws as approved by the Standards Board

• Acknowledge that all work accomplished as a result of her/his service, including

all work outcomes/products, is for the benefit of the Election Assistance

Commission; belongs to the Election Assistance Commission, and will be

relinquished to the Election Assistance Commission upon request of the

Commissioner. This includes, but is not limited to: surveys and survey results,

research, and comments provided to Election Assistance Commission-issued draft

documents

• Agree that she or he will not publish, distribute, reproduce, manufacture or sell

said work products or outcomes as her or his own without prior written

permission from the Election Assistance Commission

• Not present herself or himself as a representative of the Election Assistance

Commission at any time other than in the fulfillment of the duties and

responsibilities as described for the position

To nominate yourself or someone else for the Election Assistance Commission Standards Board 

Executive Board, complete the above 3-page form and return to: 

Kimberly Smith, by Friday, March 1, 2024 at 5:00 PM Eastern email: ksmith@eac.gov

Signature _________________________________ Date: ____________________ 

(electronic signature acceptable)
No. 11-1338.

#### Weisshaus *v.*Fagan et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### PAIK, M. v. PAIK, S.

912 EDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/11/2017

2015-14333 (Montgomery)

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF STEVENS INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             650
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,744
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,889
<INVENTORY>                                     13,065
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,407
<PP&E>                                          39,685
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,708
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,108
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,331
<BONDS>                                             47
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           945
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,209
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,108
<SALES>                                         24,248
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,248
<CGS>                                           22,866
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,578
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   592
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,651
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8,573)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       213
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (8,360)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.88)
        

</TABLE>
#### Bernard WEITERS, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Warden Travis BRAGG, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-7244

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 31, 2018

Decided: February 14, 2018

Bernard Weiters, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Nicholas Bianchi, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

*169Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bernard Weiters, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing with prejudice Weit-ers’ 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Weiters has failed to satisfy his burden of demonstrating that 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) is an inadequate or ineffective means of challenging the validity of his detention. *See Rice v. Rivera,*617 F.3d 802, 807 (4th Cir. 2010); *United States v. Poole,*531 F.3d 263, 267 n.7 (4th Cir. 2008). As such, the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider the merits of Weiters’ petition. *Rice,*617 F.3d at 807. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, modify the district court’s judgment to reflect that the dismissal of Weiters’ petition is without prejudice, and affirm the district court’s judgment as modified. *See S. Walk at Broadlands Homeowner’s Ass’n v. OpenBand at Broadlands, LLC,*713 F.3d 175, 185 (4th Cir. 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED*
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Plan Administrator
Sizeler Real Estate Management Co., Inc. 401(k) Plan

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-85212) on Form S-8 of Sizeler Property Investors, Inc. of our report dated
June 7, 2002, with respect to the statement of net assets available for benefits
of Sizeler Real Estate Management Co., Inc. 401(k) Plan as of December 31, 2001,
and the related statement of changes in net assets available for benefits for
the period from November 1, 2001 (inception) to December 31, 2001, and the
related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31,
2001, annual report on Form 11-K of Sizeler Real Estate Management Co., Inc.
401(k) Plan.


KPMG LLP
New Orleans, Louisiana
June 26, 2002
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8227 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to remove the bronze plaque and 

concrete block bearing the name of Francis Newlands from the grounds 

of the memorial fountain located at Chevy Chase Circle in the District 

of Columbia, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 11, 2020 

Ms. NORTON (for herself and Mr. RASKIN) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to remove the bronze 

plaque and concrete block bearing the name of Francis 

Newlands from the grounds of the memorial fountain 

located at Chevy Chase Circle in the District of Columbia, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Francis G. Newlands 

5 Memorial Removal Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8227 IH

1 SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF PLAQUE AND CONCRETE FROM ME2 MORIAL FOUNTAIN GROUNDS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior 

4 shall— 

5 (1) remove the bronze plaque bearing the name 

6 ‘‘Francis G. Newlands’’ from the memorial fountain 

7 grounds; 

8 (2) remove from the fountain the block of con9 crete that is inscribed with the name of, and other 

10 information related to, Francis Griffith Newlands; 

11 and 

12 (3) donate the items removed pursuant to para13 graphs (1) and (2) to the descendants of Francis 

14 Griffith Newlands. 

15 (b) MEMORIAL FOUNTAIN.—For the purposes of this 

16 section, the term ‘‘memorial fountain’’ means the memo17 rial fountain located at Chevy Chase Circle, Connecticut 

18 Avenue and Western Avenue NW, in the District of Co19 lumbia. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS