alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EAVS Jurisdictions: 2022 EAVS Data Brief: Alabama 67 

 Voter Registration 

Active Reg. Voters as of Nov. 8, 20221 

3,283,842 

Reg. Forms Received2* 

1,132,263 

--

Total Confirmation Notices Sent3* 

Voters Removed from Reg. Rolls4* 

298,554 

Source of Registration Applications5 



Motor Vehicle Dept. 68.0% 

Online 13.0% 

In Person 9.8% 

Other 5.1% 

Mail, Email, Fax 2.1% 

Voting and Turnout  Election Technology 

Voters Participating By Mode6 

7 Turnout 

37.2% In-Person 

Election Day 

1,373,247 

96.4% 

Mail 

32,577 

2.3% 

Other 

3,510 

0.2% 

Total Voting Locations8: 2,014 

Total Poll Workers9: 5,564 



Percentage of Jurisdictions Using...10 

100.0% 

Ballot 

Marking 

Devices 

100.0% 

Scanners

94.0% 

Electronic 

Poll 

Books 

0.0% 

DREs w/o 

VVPAT 

0.0% 

DREs with 

V VPAT 

0.0% 

Hand 

Counting 

Mail Ballots 

• 28,646 mail ballots transmitted11 

• 86.1% of transmitted mail ballots returned by voters12 

• 98.4% of returned mail ballots counted13 

• No data reported on returned mail ballots rejected14 

• Did not conduct all-mail election15 

• Did not allow drop boxes16 

• Did not allow ballot curing17 

 Election Audits18 

-- Access audit -- Legal audit 

-- Logic and accuracy 

testing -- Ballot design audit 

Ballot reconciliation 

audit 

Post-election 

tabulation audit -- --

Compliance/ 

procedural audit -- ✔ Other 

-- Eligibility audit 

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at www.eac.gov 

/research-and-data/datasets-codebooks-and-surveys. 

Responses of “Does not apply,” “Data not available,” and “Valid 

skip” are shown as zeroes or dashes. Percentages may not sum 

to 100% because of missing data or rounding. 

* Close of registration for 2020 

general election to close of 

registration for 2022 general 

election. 

1 A1b of EAVS. 

2 A3a of EAVS. 

3 A8a of EAVS. 

4 A9a of EAVS. 

5 Mail, Email, Fax is A4a/A3a. 

In Person is A4b/A3a. Online is 

A4c/A3a. Motor Vehicle Dept. is 

A4d/A3a. Other is the sum of 

A4e–A4l/A3a. May not sum to 

100% because of missing data. 

6 In-Person Election Day is F1b. 

Mail is F1d+F1g. In-Person Early 

is F1f. Other is F1c+F1e+F1h. 

7 F1a of EAVS divided by citizen 

voting age population (CVAP). 

8 D2a of EAVS. 

9 D7a of EAVS. 

10 F3a–f, F5a–F9a of EAVS; 

number of jurisdictions that 

responded “Yes” divided by

number of jurisdictions in 

state/territory. 

11 C1a of EAVS. 

12 C1b/C1a of EAVS. 

13 C8a/C1b of EAVS. 

14 C9a/C1b of EAVS. 

15 Q17 and Q17a of Policy 

Survey. 

16 Q19 of Policy Survey. 

17 Q20 of Policy Survey. 

18 Q36 of Policy Survey. See 

survey questionnaire for full 

definitions of each type of 

audit.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 29 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 29

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
  regarding the liability of Members of Congress for false statements 
              made in carrying out their official duties.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 1997

   Mrs. Myrick introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
  regarding the liability of Members of Congress for false statements 
              made in carrying out their official duties.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Senators and Representatives may be held liable for 
false statements or other false communications made in carrying out 
their official duties.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article 
by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8423 

To reimburse meals and supplements provided to individuals who have not 

attained the age of 25 under certain meal programs authorized under 

the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2020 

Ms. JAYAPAL (for herself and Ms. STEFANIK) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To reimburse meals and supplements provided to individuals 

who have not attained the age of 25 under certain meal 

programs authorized under the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Feeding Homeless 

5 Youth During COVID–19 Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8423 IH

1 SEC. 2. MEALS AND SUPPLEMENTS REIMBURSEMENTS FOR 

2 INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE NOT ATTAINED THE 

3 AGE OF 25. 

4 (a) PROGRAM FOR AT-RISK SCHOOL CHILDREN.— 

5 Beginning on the date of enactment of this section, not6 withstanding paragraph (1)(A) of section 17(r) of the 

7 Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 

8 1766(r)), during the COVID–19 public health emergency 

9 declared under section 319 of the Public Health Service 

10 Act (42 U.S.C. 247d), the Secretary shall reimburse insti11 tutions that are emergency shelters under such section 

12 17(r) (42 U.S.C. 1766(r)) for meals and supplements 

13 served to individuals who, at the time of such service— 

14 (1) have not attained the age of 25; and 

15 (2) are receiving assistance from such emer16 gency shelter. 

17 (b) PARTICIPATION BY EMERGENCY SHELTERS.— 

18 Beginning on the date of enactment of this section, not19 withstanding paragraph (5)(A) of section 17(t) of the 

20 Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 

21 1766(t)), during the COVID–19 public health emergency 

22 declared under section 319 of the Public Health Service 

23 Act (42 U.S.C. 247d), the Secretary shall reimburse emer24 gency shelters under such section 17(t) (42 U.S.C. 

25 1766(t)) for meals and supplements served to individuals 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8423 IH

1 who, at the time of such service, have not attained the 

2 age of 25. 

3 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

4 (1) EMERGENCY SHELTER.—The term ‘‘emer5 gency shelter’’ has the meaning given the term 

6 under section 17(t)(1) of the Richard B. Russell Na7 tional School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1766(t)(1)). 

8 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

9 the Secretary of Agriculture. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Comments in Response to 

"Final rule; request for comments" 

Docket: FAA-2015-1537 

Directorate Identifier 2015-SW-014-AD 

Comments have been received in response to: "Final rule; requestfor comments," 

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket and Directorate Identifier entered above. 

(Project engineer: Please review any comments to determine if additional action is warranted 

Once you have made your determination, please fill in the commenter(s) name(s) and check the 

appropriate response below. Include additional information following the appropriate response, 

if necessary. Then include your name and the date in the spaces provided, and return it to the 

AD directorate focal. 

The FAA has reviewed comment(s) related to the above FAA Docket that we received from: 

Tanya Tuinstra of Enstrom Helicopter Corporation 

(Please check one) 

1Z1 These comments have not been found to contain any information to warrant reconsideration 

or change of this AD. 

The Service Directive Bulletins (SDBs) referenced in the comment were revised after the 

Emergency AD was issued. Since this AD was considered to be an interim action, we will 

consider the most current SDBs once final action is identified. 

D These comments have been found to contain information that warrants consideration of 

additional regulatory action. (SEE Airworthiness Directives Manual 

F~-IR-~~.0 ~ADDITIONAL ACTION.) 

~ ~~ 

Rev 0 (9/08) 

Michalik July 22, 2015 

Date: 

(This form is part of the official docket file for this AD action.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND
ON PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                       2,615,661
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,479,514
<ALLOWANCES>                                   501,165
<INVENTORY>                                  2,760,461
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,436,835
<PP&E>                                       1,911,847
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,270,514
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,214,927
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,280,138
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        62,266
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,208,794
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,214,927
<SALES>                                        848,549
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               848,549
<CGS>                                          447,092
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,999,535
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (2,430)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,107,997)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,730
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,122,727)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,122,727)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.18)
        

</TABLE>
#### Ronald MCCLARY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lieutenant CROSSON; Officer Williams; Officer Hicks; Officer Walls, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-7323

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 22, 2018

Decided: February 28, 2018

Ronald McClary, Appellant Pro Se. Vanessa N. Totten, Assistant Attorney General, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald McClary appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *McClary v. Crosson,*No. 5:15-ct-03259-D, 2017 WL 4236072 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 25, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8475 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to temporarily increase the 

deduction for certain expenses of elementary and secondary school teachers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 1, 2020 

Mr. BERA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to temporarily 

increase the deduction for certain expenses of elementary 

and secondary school teachers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tools to Educate All 

5 Children at Home Act’’ or the ‘‘TEACH Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8475 IH

1 SEC. 2. TEMPORARY INCREASE OF DEDUCTION FOR CER2 TAIN EXPENSES OF ELEMENTARY AND SEC3 ONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (D) of section 

5 62(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended 

6 to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘(D) CERTAIN EXPENSES OF ELEMENTARY

8 AND SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS.— 

9 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The deductions al10 lowed by section 162 which consist of ex11 penses, not in excess of $250, paid or in12 curred by an eligible educator— 

13 ‘‘(I) by reason of the participa14 tion of the educator in professional 

15 development courses related to the 

16 curriculum in which the educator pro17 vides instruction or to the students 

18 for which the educator provides in19 struction, and 

20 ‘‘(II) in connection with books, 

21 supplies (other than nonathletic sup22 plies for courses of instruction in 

23 health or physical education), com24 puter equipment (including related 

25 software and services) and other 

26 equipment, and supplementary mateVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:43 Oct 29, 2020 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H8475.IH H8475

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8475 IH

1 rials used by the eligible educator in 

2 the classroom or in connection with 

3 online classroom instruction. 

4 ‘‘(ii) SPECIAL RULE FOR TAXABLE

5 YEARS 2020 AND 2021.—In the case of a 

6 taxable year beginning after December 31, 

7 2019, and before January 1, 2022, clause 

8 (i) shall be applied by substituting ‘$1,000’ 

9 for ‘$250’.’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

12 December 31, 2019. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### PNC BANK v. D’ELIA, G.

1475 WDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

9/12/2017

Reargument Denied 11/17/2017

GD 15-020177

(Allegheny)

Affirmed
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Hossein AFSHARI, aka Hosseini Deklami; Mohammad Omidvar; Hassan Rezaie; Roya Rahmani, aka Sister Tahmineh; Navid Taj, aka Najaf Eshkoftegi; Mustafa Ahmady; Alireza Mohamad Moradi, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-50355.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Oct. 20, 2005.

Ronald L. Cheng, Esq., USLA—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, Yoel Tobin, Esq., Douglas N. Letter, Esq., DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Appellate Staff, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Nadine C. Hettle, Esq., FPDCA— Federal Public Defender’s Office (Los Ange-les), Anthony Pacheco, Proskauer Rose LLP, Sam S. Puathasnanon, Esq., Manatt Phelps *&*Phillips, LLP, David R. Reed, Esq., Law Office of David R. Reed, Richard M. Steingard, Esq., Los Angeles, CA, Michael J. Treman, Esq., Attorney at Law, Santa Barbara, CA, Yolanda M. Barrera, Esq., Monrovia, CA, Abbe David Lowell, Esq., Chadbourne & Parke LLP, Washington, DC, Stephen P. Berzon, Esq., Altshu-ler Berzon Nussbaum Rubin & Demain, San Francisco, CA, David R. Evans, Esq. Pasadena, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Margaret C. Crosby, Esq., American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California, George C. Harris, Esq., Somnath Chatterjee, Esq., Morrison & Foerster, LLP, Ephraim Margolin, Esq., Somnath Chatterjee, Esq., San Francisco, CA, for Amici.

Before KLEINFELD, WARDLAW, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The opinion filed June 17, 2005, and appearing at 412 F.3d 1071 (9th Cir.2005), is withdrawn. Pursuant to General Order 5.3.a, an opinion is filed contemporaneously with this order. With the withdrawal of the opinion, the petition for rehearing is granted and petition for rehearing en banc is denied as moot. Subsequent petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc may be filed. Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 40 now controls.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                        BENCHMARQ MICROELECTRONICS, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
                                                                     THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                          MARCH 31
                                                                ----------------------------
                                                                  1997                 1996               
                                                                --------              ------              
<S>                                                             <C>                   <C>                 
Earnings:                                                                                                 
  Net income.............................................         $1,643              $1,057              
                                                                  ======              ======              
                                                                                                          
Shares:                                                                                                   
  Weighted average common shares outstanding.............          6,788               6,554              
  Weighted average common equivalent shares:                                                              
     Add:  Common shares issued on assumed                                                                
           exercise of stock options and warrants........          1,212                 852              
     Less: Shares assumed repurchased....................            328                 181              
                                                                  ------              ------              
                                                                                                          
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares.....          7,672               7,225              
                                                                  ======              ======              
                                                                                                          
Earnings per common and common equivalent share..........         $ 0.21               $0.15              
                                                                  ======              ======              
 </TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
          This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from
          Basic Natural Resources,  Inc. September 30, 1996 financial statements
          and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
          statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000817125
<NAME>                        Basic Natural Resources, Inc.

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          41,209
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    174,865
<COMMON>                                       119
<OTHER-SE>                                     (216,193)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .00
        


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Julian HERNANDEZ-MOTA, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40595 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 20, 2018

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Julian Hernandez-Mota, Pro Se

Before REAVLEY, CLEMENT, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Julian Hernandez-Mota has *300moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez-Mota has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *300published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R, 47.5,4.