alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


December 20, 2017


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust 358 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting of the unit investment trusts (the “Trusts”) included in
the Registration Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trusts on the date
hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such securities as of close of business on December 19, 2017, in
accordance with the valuation method set forth in the applicable Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreements. We
consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust securities in the
Registration Statement (No. 333-220875) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the
sale of the Units of the Trusts and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO                         


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
**Exhibit 32**

**Certification ofChief Executive OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of Alliance Imaging, Inc. (the “*Company*”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge,that:

(i)    theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarterended June 30, 2007 (the “*Report*”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)   theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:November 9, 2007
|        | /s/ Paul S. Viviano       |   |
|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|   | Paul S. Viviano           |
|   | Chairman of the Board and |
|   | Chief Executive Officer   |

 

----

**Certification ofChief Financial OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of Alliance Imaging, Inc. (the “*Company*”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge,that:

(i)    theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarterended June 30, 2007 (the “*Report*”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)   theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:November 9, 2007
|        | /s/ Howard K. Aihara                                 |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Howard K. Aihara                                     |
|   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### Sundari K. PRASAD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KARN ART, INC.; Sean Karn, CEO; Athena Karn, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-7506

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 22, 2018

Decided: February 27, 2018

Sundari K. Prasad, Appellant Pro Se.

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge,

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sundari K. Prasad appeals the district court’s order dismissing as frivolous Pra-sad’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012). civil rights action because'she failed to allege facts *330establishing that any of the named Defendants were acting under color of state law.* On appeal, we confine our review to the, issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. *See*4th Cir. R. 34(b). Prasad does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition in her informal brief. Thus, Prasad has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. *See Williams v. Giant Food Inc.,*370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*

*

 The district court dismissed this action after conducting frivolity review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2012).
1

The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-3543

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Arkansas.

Bobby Jack Stanley, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: June 6, 2006

Filed: June 9, 2006

___________

Before MELLOY, FAGG, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Bobby Jack Stanley pleaded guilty to distribution of methamphetamine, and

was sentenced to 12 months and 1 day in prison and 3 years of supervised release.

After Stanley began serving his supervised release, the probation officer petitioned to

revoke supervised release alleging that Stanley had violated his release conditions.

At a subsequent revocation hearing, Stanley admitted violating the conditions of his

supervised release as alleged. The district court1

 revoked supervised release and

imposed a new sentence of 9 months imprisonment, commenting on the Chapter 7
-2-

Guidelines recommended revocation range, Stanley’s prior and current supervised

release violations, and the leniency of the sentence that he had received for his original

offense. Stanley appeals his revocation sentence.

The revocation sentence was within authorized limits, and the district court

considered appropriate factors in imposing it. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3). We

conclude that Stanley’s sentence is not unreasonable. See United States v. Tyson, 413

F.3d 824, 825 (8th Cir. 2005) (standard of review). 

Accordingly, we affirm, and we also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. 

______________________________
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

					NO. 2-03-366-CR

ERNEST ALFORD COLLIFLOWER          					APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	----------

	FROM THE 43RD DISTRICT COURT OF PARKER COUNTY

----------

		MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered “Appellant’s Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”  The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See id.; Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f). 						

										PER CURIAM

PANEL F:	DAUPHINOT, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)			

DELIVERED: March 15, 2007
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as ofDecember 1, 2014, by and among RBS COMMERCIAL FUNDING INC., as Depositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSETMANAGEMENT LLC, as Special Servicer, TRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, INC, asTrust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as CertificateAdministrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, and WILMINGTON TRUST,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C25 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice Presidentof Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018.

 

 

/s/Daniel Bober

DanielBober

ExecutiveVice President 

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
# Den Europæiske Unions C 114A/28.

| | ISSN 1977-0871 |
| --- | --- |
| Den Europæiske Unions
  Tidende | C 114A |
| | |
| Dansk udgave | Meddelelser og oplysninger | 61. årgang28. marts 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0871

Den Europæiske Unions

Tidende

C 114A

Dansk udgave

Meddelelser og oplysninger

61. årgang28. marts 2018

---

| Informationsnummer | Indhold | Side |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Øvrige meddelelser |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURER |
| | Europa-Parlamentet |
| 2018/C 114 A/01 | Udvælgelsesprocedure PE/199/S — Midlertidigt ansat — direktionsmedarbejder (AD 5) — Liste over egnede ansøgere | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Indhold

Side

V   Øvrige meddelelser

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURER

Europa-Parlamentet

2018/C 114 A/01

Udvælgelsesprocedure PE/199/S — Midlertidigt ansat — direktionsmedarbejder (AD 5) — Liste over egnede ansøgere

1

---

| DA | |
| --- | --- |

DA

---

V Øvrige meddelelser

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURER

Europa-Parlamentet

| 28.3.2018 | DA | Den Europæiske Unions Tidende | CA 114/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2018

DA

Den Europæiske Unions Tidende

CA 114/1

---

UDVÆLGELSESPROCEDURE PE/199/S

Midlertidigt ansat — direktionsmedarbejder (AD 5)

LISTE OVER EGNEDE ANSØGERE

(2018/C 114 A/01)

| 1. | FISCHER, Jessica Isabell |
| --- | --- |

1.

FISCHER, Jessica Isabell

| 2. | LEMAIRE, Cléo |
| --- | --- |

2.

LEMAIRE, Cléo

| 3. | COURTADE, Christelle |
| --- | --- |

3.

COURTADE, Christelle

Listen over egnede ansøgere er gyldig indtil den 31. december 2020.

---
Unclassified

Unclassified

1

Nuclear Enterprise Directorate (NE) 
Unclassified

Unclassified

2

NE Mission

Provide innovative support to Department of Defense (DoD) 

warfighters, OSD, the Joint Staff, the Interagency, Allies and Partners, 

to ensure a safe, secure, reliable, and effective strategic deterrent, 

and provide world class Counter WMD, nuclear weapons, and CNI 

training as well as critical infrastructure vulnerability assessments.
Nuclear Enterprise Core Functions

3

➢ Joint Mission 

Assurance 

Assessments

➢ Balanced Survivability 

Assessments

➢ DoD Red Team

➢ Cyber

➢ Analysis

➢ Assessment Report 

Repository 

➢ Force on Force 

Exercises

➢ Nuclear Weapons 

Accident/Incident 

Exercises

➢ Weapons System 

Safety Reports

➢ Security Deviation 

Reports

➢ Nuclear Security Policy

➢ Defense Nuclear Surety 

Inspection Oversight

➢ PRP Staff Assistance 

Visits

➢ DIAMONDS

➢ Defense Stockpile 

Management System

➢ Stockpile Emergency 

Verification (SEV)

➢ Weapons Program 

Managers

Ensure Nuclear 

Surety

Insert picture

Provide 

Accountability and 

Logistics Educate and Train

Insert picture

Oversee Nuclear 

Inspections

Insert picture

Execute 

Assessments

Insert picture

➢ Defense Nuclear 

Weapons School

➢ Nuclear Weapons 

Instructional Museum

Keys to our success are our people and our ability to provide comprehensive, independent nuclear support
Unclassified

Unclassified

4

NE Current Requirements

• Subject Matter Experts (to include Advisory and Assistance Services) and 

program management for all areas of the mission (e.g. nuclear weapon 

safety)

• IT application designers, system administrators, and system engineers to 

design, build, maintain, and administer U.S. nuclear weapon accounting 

system(s); cyber tools for mission assurance assessments; and modeling/

simulation

• Security professionals and cross-domain engineers versed in facility 

protection, mission assurance assessments, and force-on-force tests

• Professional emergency response/disaster planning/preparedness support
Unclassified

Unclassified

5

NE Future Requirements

Capacity and Capability Enhancement

• Moving forward, NE will apply resources to expanding capacity relative to 

the multiple lines of effort delineated in our current requirements on the 

previous slide

Future Initiatives

• Improve DTRA capability to provide high-fidelity cyber assessments and 

threat-based mission assurance assessments, and solutions for nuclear 

physical security

• Expand DTRA capacity to provide educational, training, and exercise 

support that will enhance Combatant Command and Special Operations 

Forces (SOF) capabilities to plan, control, and execute U.S. and allied 

missions that integrate U.S. nuclear and non-nuclear forces
Petition for Exemption

Matthew Gerlitzki

PO Box 61

Muldraugh, KY 40155

mgerlitzki@gmail.com

619-772-3439 Mobile

Exemption RE: 

Part 121.436 Pilot Qualification: Certificates and experience requirements.

(a) No certificate holder may use nor may any pilot act as pilot in command of an aircraft 

(or as second in command of an aircraft in a flag or supplemental operation that requires 

three or more pilots) unless the pilot:

(3) If serving as pilot in command in part 121 operations, has 1,000 hours as second in 

command in operations under this part, pilot in command in operations under 

§91.1053(a)(2)(i) of this chapter, pilot in command in operations under §135.243(a)(1) of 

this chapter, or any combination thereof. For those pilots who are employed as pilot in 

command in part 121 operations on July 31, 2013, compliance with the requirements of 

this paragraph (a)(3) is not required.

(c) For the purpose of satisfying the flight hour requirement in paragraph (a)(3) of this 

section, a pilot may credit 500 hours of military flight time obtained as pilot in command 

of a multiengine turbine-powered, fixed-wing airplane in an operation requiring more 

than one pilot.

Relief:

Seeking an exemption to the above rule by replacing (c) “fixed-wing airplane” with 

“rotary aircraft.”

Purpose/Reason:

To achieve the 1,000 hour requirement to operate as pilot in command in part 121 

operations.

My experiences would offer the public an equal level of safety by crediting my military

helicopter flight pilot in command experiences toward the 1,000 hour requirement.

- I served in the military as a CH-47D/F Chinook helicopter aviator flying in 

domestic and international areas of operation to include South Korea and 

Afghanistan.

- I am a military trained and certified Aviation Safety Officer that was responsible 

for risk management by identifying, assessing, and mitigating hazards to the

lowest level on a daily basis.
Petition for Exemption

- One year of flying combat missions in Afghanistan that required thorough flight 

planning, multi crew, and multi aircraft integrations in all modes of flight while 

incorporating Crew Resource Management.

- I have experienced critical decision making situations, as pilot in command that

directly affected the safety of operations to include in combat.

- My experiences operating the CH-47D/F as pilot in command will assist me to be 

a competent and safe Part 121 pilot in command.

- The CH-47D/F is a heavy-lift helicopter, transporting passengers and equipment,

gross weight of 50,000lbs.

- I credited approximately 50% of my rotary flight time towards my ATP 

certificate.

- I possess an ATP certificate with an EMB-145 type rating.

Summary:

Regarding Part 121.436 (c), I petition the administrator to allow my military pilot in 

command flight time in rotary turbine powered aircraft to be credited towards the 1,000 

hour requirement. My pilot in command experiences operating the CH-47D/F Chinook 

helicopter will offer an equal level of safety to the public as required in Part 121.436.
No. 11-10443.

#### Porcelli, aka James *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

[NSA LOGO APPEARS HERE]



           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS
           ---------------------------------------------------------

       We hereby consent to the reference to our firm and to our reports
  effective December 31, 1994; December 31, 1995; and December 31, 1996, and to
  the use of our reports in the Annual Report of Flores & Rucks, Inc. on Form
  10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996 to be filed with the Securities and
  Exchange Commission on or about March 27, 1997.


                                  NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.


                                  By:   Original Signed by Frederic D. Sewell
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                      Frederic D. Sewell
                                      President

  Dallas, Texas
  March 25, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           6,238                   5,608
<SECURITIES>                                     3,815                   7,432
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,541                   3,335
<ALLOWANCES>                                       191                     151
<INVENTORY>                                      1,154                   1,334
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,809                  17,982
<PP&E>                                           4,325                   5,006
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,570                   3,343
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,865                  19,726
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,559                   5,664
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             8                      12
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,007                  13,979
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,865                  19,726
<SALES>                                          7,615                   6,538
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,641                   8,608
<CGS>                                            3,630                   3,417
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,466                   4,216
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,694                  11,649
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,261)                 (6,706)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,261)                 (6,706)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,261)                 (6,706)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.73)                   (.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
Max 24-hour Emissions

Emission Point Maximum 24-Hour Actual Emission Rate (lbs/day)

Nox SO2 PM10

B-1 112 9417 1109

B-2 147 11644 1230

B-3 116 11596 1631

SF-1 0 0 547

SF-2 0 0 455

SF-3A 0 0 851

D-5.0 971 8323 1775

DF-1 0 0 81

DF-2 0 0 68

1346 40979 7746

Permit Limits (lbs/hr) - Excluded Certain Equipment

Emission Point Nox SO2 PM10

Exclude Rx A B-1 4.66 392.36 46.20

B-2 6.14 485.17 51.24

Exclude Rx 11 B-3 4.84 483.16 67.96

SF-1 22.80

SF-2 18.96

SF-3A 35.44

Exclude Dryer 6 D-2.7 20.08 145.82 36.68

Exclude Dryers A and 5 D-5.0 40.45 346.78 73.94

DF-1 3.36

DF-2 2.84

Exclude DF-3 2.92

Permit Limits (lbs/hr)

Nox SO2 PM10

B-1 6.21 523.15 61.60

B-2 6.14 485.17 51.24

B-3 6.81 680.51 95.72

SF-1 22.80

SF-2 18.96

SF-3A 35.44

D-2.7 20.08 145.82 36.68

D-5.0 67.42 577.96 123.24

DF-1 3.36

DF-2 2.84

DF-3 2.92
#### COM. v. ORTIZ-LUGO, L.

1225 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/11/2017

CP-01-CR-0000178-2003 (Adams)

Affirmed
#### COM. v. BAKER, G.

1109 WDA 2015

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/08/2017

CP-04-CR-0000197-2010 (Beaver)

Affirmed
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND Petitioner Misc. Docket AG V. No. 0062 BRYNEE KYONNE BAYLOR September Term, 2014 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MD. Respondent Case no. 30519-M **********************# ORDER This matter came before the Court on the parties' Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent in the above entitled matter, it is this 5th day of June, 2015; ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Joint Petition be, and it is hereby GRANTED; and it is further, ORDERED, that the Respondent, Brynee Kyonne Baylor, is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Maryland for engaging in professional misconduct involving violations of Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct 1.15 and 8.4(c); and it is further, ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name Brynee Kyonne Baylor from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-772(d). /s/ Glenn T. Harrell, Jr. Senior Judge
No. 11-1512.

#### Larremore et ux. *v.*Lykes Brothers, Inc.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1141,1155

INTERACTIVE HEALTH, LLC (now known as Human Touch, LLC)

and DAITO DENGKI KOGYU K.K. (doing business as

Daito Electric Machine Industry, Inc.),

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

KING KONG USA, INC., AMERICAN LIGHTING INDUSTRY, INC.,

and BERNARD KOAY,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

WFO IMPORTS LLC,

Defendant-Cross Appellant,

and

BLAIR HAYES,

Defendant-Cross Appellant,

and

H EALTH F I RST LLC,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District

of California in case no. 06-CV-1902, Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank.

ON MOTION

Before DYK Circuit Judge.

ORDER
WFO Imports, LLC submits a motion for a stay of execution of the judgment,

pending disposition of this appeal.

Upon consideration thereof,

Interactive Health, LLC et al.'s response is due no later than March 2,

2009.

Execution of the judgment is temporarily stayed as against WFO Imports,

LLC, pending disposition of the motion to stay.*

FOR THE COURT

FEB 13 2009

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

cc:	David A. Dillard, Esq.

Leslie F. Vandale, Esq.

Peter J. Korneffel, Jr., Esq.

s8 FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

FEB 1 3 2009

JAN HORBALY

CLERK

Date

The temporary stay is granted to preserve the status quo. It is not based

upon a consideration of the merits of the motion.

2009-1141, -1155	- 2 -