alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1 Certification of CEO Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act
 Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 I, Brian P. Burns, certify that:
 I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of BF Enterprises, Inc.;Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andDisclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and
1The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andAny fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.**BF ENTERPRISES, INC.**Date:  May 10, 2004
By:
/s/ Brian P. BurnsChairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
2
Total Polling Locations:

Election Day:7 1,975 

Early Voting:8 116 

Mail Ballots Transmitted10 Mail Ballots Returned11

447,697 430,229 (96.1% of 

transmitted) 

Mail Ballots Counted12 Mail Ballots Rejected13

425,701 (98.9% of 

returned)

4,528 (1.1% of 

returned) 

Mail Voting Policies 

No excuse is required for mail voting14

Does not conduct all-mail elections15

No permanent absentee voting list16

EAVS Jurisdictions

46 

Total Registered Voters as of 

Nov. 3, 20201

3,854,209 

Registration Forms Received2*

2,119,337 

Total Confirmation Notices Sent3*

75,796 

2020 EAVS Data Brief: South Carolina

 Voter Registration

2.4%

16.9%

18.4%

19.7%

42.5%

Other

Online

In-Person

Mail, Email, Fax

Motor Vehicle Dept.

Source of Registration Applications4

 Voter Turnout  Election Technology

In-Person 

Election 

Day Voters 

1,182,726

46.9%

Mail Voters 

428,704

17.0%

In-Person 

Early Voters

894,078

35.4%

Other Mode 

18,348

0.7%

Voters Participating By Mode5

46 46 46

0 0 0

Ballot

Marking

Device

Scanner Electronic

Poll

Books

DRE w/o

VVPAT

DRE with

VVPAT

Hand

Count

Technology Used by Jurisdictions9

 Mail Balloting

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at www.eac.gov. 

The data shown are certified as final by state election authorities. 

Responses of “Does not apply,” “Data not available, ” and “Valid 

skip” are shown as zeroes or dashes. Percentages may not sum 

to 100% because of missing data or rounding. 

* Close of registration for 2018 

general election to close of 

registration for 2020 general 

election. 

1 A1a of EAVS. 

2 A3a of EAVS. 

3 A8a of EAVS. 

4 Mail, Email, Fax is A4a. InPerson is A4b. Online is A4c. 

Motor Vehicle Dept. is A4d. 

Other is the sum of A4e–A4l. 

Denominator is A3a. 

5 In-Person Election Day Voters 

is F1b. Mail Voters is F1d+F1g. 

In-Person Early Voters is F1f. 

Other Mode is F1c+F1e+F1h. 

Denominator is sum of F1b–

F1h. 

6 F1a of EAVS. Denominator 

is citizen voting age 

population (CVAP). 

7 D3a of EAVS. 

8 D4a of EAVS. 

9 F3a–d, F5a, F6a, F7a, F8a, 

and F11a of EAVS. 

10 C1a of EAVS. 

11 C1b of EAVS. 

12 C3a of EAVS. 

13 C4a of EAVS. 

14Q17 of Policy Survey. 

15 Q18 and Q18a of Policy 

Survey. 

16 Q19 of Policy Survey. 

Turnout 

64.8%

6
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           8,685
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,178
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,139
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,255
<PP&E>                                       1,226,902
<DEPRECIATION>                                 416,817 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 894,487
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           65,601
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          115,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           202
<OTHER-SE>                                     396,654
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   894,487
<SALES>                                        101,434
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               102,025
<CGS>                                           62,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   62,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,099
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,745
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,981
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,249
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,746
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,746
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .66
        

</TABLE>
2022 EAVS Data Brief: Maryland EAVS Jurisdictions:

24 

 Voter Registration 

Active Reg. Voters as of Nov. 8, 20221 

4,149,909 

Reg. Forms Received2* 

3,513,915 

Total Confirmation Notices Sent3* 

395,112 

Voters Removed from Reg. Rolls4* 

268,612 

Source of Registration Applications5 

Motor Vehicle Dept. 74.8% 

Online 12.4% 

Other 7.3% 

Mail, Email, Fax 3.4% 

In Person 2.1% 

 Voting and Turnout 

Voters Participating By Mode6 

7 Turnout 

45.9% 

In-Person 

Election Day

1,046,153 

51.6% 

Mail 

536,285 

26.4% 

In-Person 

Early 

380,874 

18.8% 

Other 

65,538 

3.2% 

Total Voting Locations8: 1,588 

Total Poll Workers9: 18,311 

Election Technology 

Percentage of Jurisdictions Using...10 

100.0% 

Ballot 

Marking 

Devices 

100.0% 

Electronic 

Poll 

Books 

100.0% 

Scanners 

0.0% 

DREs w/o 

VVPAT 

0.0% 

REs with 

VVPAT 

0.0% 

D Hand 

Counting 

 Mail Ballots 

• 647,747 mail ballots transmitted11 

• 83.1% of transmitted mail ballots returned by voters12 

• 99.6% of returned mail ballots counted13 

• 0.4% of returned mail ballots rejected14 

• Did not conduct all-mail election15 

• Allowed drop boxes16 

• Allowed ballot curing17 

 Election Audits18 

-- Access audit 

-- Ballot design audit 

✔ Ballot reconciliation 

audit 

✔ Compliance/ 

procedural audit 

-- Eligibility audit 

-- Legal audit 

✔ Logic and accuracy 

testing 

✔ Post-election 

tabulation audit 

✔ Other 

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at www.eac.gov 

/research-and-data/datasets-codebooks-and-surveys. 

Responses of “Does not apply,” “Data not available,” and “Valid 

skip” are shown as zeroes or dashes. Percentages may not sum 

to 100% because of missing data or rounding. 

* Close of registration for 2020 

general election to close of 

registration for 2022 general 

election. 

1 A1b of EAVS. 

2 A3a of EAVS. 

3 A8a of EAVS. 

4 A9a of EAVS. 

5 Mail, Email, Fax is A4a/A3a. 

In Person is A4b/A3a. Online is 

A4c/A3a. Motor Vehicle Dept. is 

A4d/A3a. Other is the sum of 

A4e–A4l/A3a. May not sum to 

100% because of missing data. 

6 In-Person Election Day is F1b. 

Mail is F1d+F1g. In-Person Early 

is F1f. Other is F1c+F1e+F1h. 

7 F1a of EAVS divided by citizen 

voting age population (CVAP). 

8 D2a of EAVS. 

9 D7a of EAVS. 

10 F3a–f, F5a–F9a of EAVS; 

number of jurisdictions that 

responded “Yes” divided by

number of jurisdictions in 

state/territory. 

11 C1a of EAVS. 

12 C1b/C1a of EAVS. 

13 C8a/C1b of EAVS. 

14 C9a/C1b of EAVS. 

15 Q17 and Q17a of Policy 

Survey. 

16 Q19 of Policy Survey. 

17 Q20 of Policy Survey. 

18 Q36 of Policy Survey. See 

survey questionnaire for full 

definitions of each type of 

audit.
Exhibit 32.1

             CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRESIDENT

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Harold Blomquist, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Simtek Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Simtek Corporation.



/s/Harold Blomquist
--------------------------------------
Harold Blomquist
Chief Executive Officer and President

August 12, 2005
#### XUE LI, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 16-70106

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 13, 2018 *

Filed February 21, 2018

Xue Li, Pro Se

Jeffery R. Leist, Trial Attorney, David Kim, Trial Attorney, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Xue Li, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the REAL ID Act. *Shrestha v. Holder,*590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination based on the inconsistencies within her testimony as to the conditions of her house arrest and an inconsistency between her testimony and visa application as to whether she was arrested. *See id.*at 1048 (adverse credibility finding reasonable under the totality of the circumstances). Li’s explanations do not compel a contrary conclusion. *See Lata v. INS,*204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir. 2000). Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s finding that Li’s corroborative evidence does not independently support her claim for relief. *See Garcia v. Holder,*749 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir. 2014). In the absence of credible testimony, in this case, Li’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

Finally, Li’s CAT claim also fails because it is based on the same testimony the agency found not credible, and Li does not point to any other evidence in the record that compels the conclusion that it is more likely than not she would be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government of China. *Id.*at 1157.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3,
Exhibit 35.1





SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT





HARLEY-DAVIDSON CREDIT CORP.





I, James Darrell Thomas, Vice President, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary of Harley-Davidson Credit Corp. (“HDCC”), certify that:





(i) a review of HDCC’s activities for the period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”) and of HDCC’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2015 (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) among Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2015-1, Harley-Davidson Customer Funding Corp., HDCC, and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., has been made under my supervision; and





(ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, HDCC has fulfilled in all material respects all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement throughout the Reporting Period.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 23rd day of March, 2018.











/s/ James Darrell ThomasJames Darrell ThomasVice President, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary of Harley-Davidson Credit Corp., Servicer to Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2015-1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,965,823
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,249,227
<ALLOWANCES>                                    56,385
<INVENTORY>                                  1,052,973
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,403,025
<PP&E>                                       1,875,894
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,658,517
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,683,816
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,318,684
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       287,452
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,760,875
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,683,816
<SALES>                                      4,806,039
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,806,039
<CGS>                                        2,667,625
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,608,467
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,245
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,453
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,130
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                209,817
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,125
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            195,692
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   195,692
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8354 

To establish the Servicemembers and Veterans Initiative within the Civil 

Rights Division of the Department of Justice, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2020 

Ms. ESCOBAR (for herself and Mr. TAYLOR) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To establish the Servicemembers and Veterans Initiative 

within the Civil Rights Division of the Department of 

Justice, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Servicemembers and 

5 Veterans Initiative Act of 2020.’’ 

6 SEC. 2. SERVICEMEMBERS AND VETERANS INITIATIVE. 

7 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established the 

8 Servicemembers and Veterans Initiative within the Civil 

9 Rights Division of the Department of Justice. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8354 IH

1 (b) DUTIES.—The Servicemembers and Veterans Ini2 tiative shall— 

3 (1) serve as legal and policy advisor to the At4 torney General on the Department of Justice’s ef5 forts to enforce criminal and civil laws that impact 

6 servicemembers, veterans, and their families; 

7 (2) develop policy recommendations for the At8 torney General on how the Department of Justice 

9 may improve enforcement of Federal law to support 

10 servicemembers, veterans, and their families; 

11 (3) serve as the liaison and point of contact be12 tween the Department of Justice and the military 

13 departments; 

14 (4) provide counsel to the Assistant Attorney 

15 General for the Office of Justice Programs to ensure 

16 funding decisions take into account servicemembers, 

17 veterans, and their families; 

18 (5) consult with components of the Department 

19 of Justice to promote the provision of civil legal aid 

20 to servicemembers, veterans, and their families; 

21 (6) serve as a liaison with the Assistant Attor22 ney General for the Criminal Division to coordinate 

23 the prosecution of Federal crimes involving fraud 

24 that target servicemembers; and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8354 IH

1 (7) enforce other Federal laws that protect 

2 servicemembers and veterans, as the Attorney Gen3 eral determines appropriate. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40373

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROGELIO LOPEZ MORENO,

also known as “Pete,”

also known as “Peter,”

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:00-CR-39-11

- - - - - - - - - - March 6, 2002

Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Rogelio Lopez Moreno appeals his conviction and sentence for

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and heroin.

Moreno’s arguments focus on the application of Apprendi v. New

Jersey

, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and the fact that the original

indictment to which he pleaded guilty did not allege a drug

quantity. He argues that (1) the district court erred during

Moreno’s guilty plea hearing when it advised Moreno that he faced

a mandatory minimum sentence of ten years; (2) the district courtNo. 01-40373

-2-

erred when it granted a § 5K1.1 downward departure but did not

depart lower than 120 months; and (3) the presentencing report’s

(PSR) findings regarding drug quantities lacked sufficient indicia

of reliability.

The district court did not err in its Rule 11 admonishment,

nor did it err in the application of a mandatory minimum sentence.

In cases where a drug quantity has not been alleged, Apprendi does

not invalidate the imposition of a mandatory minimum sentence under

§§ 841(b)(1)(A) or (b)(1)(B), as long as the sentence imposed does

not exceed the statut ory maximum sentence under § 841(b)(1)(C).

See United States v. Keith , 230 F.3d 784, 787 (5th Cir. 2000),

cert. denied , 531 U.S. 1182 (2001). Moreno’s 120-month sentence

did not exceed the 20-year statutory maximum.

The district court did not err when it sentenced Moreno based

on drug quantities contained in the PSR. Moreno has failed to

present rebuttal evidence demonstrating the PSR’s inaccuracy;

therefore, th e PSR is presumed reliable for calculating drug

quantity. S ee United States v. Franklin , 148 F.3d 451, 460 (5th

Cir. 1998). Accordingly, Moreno’s conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6806

ROY HORTON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

MARK C. HENRY, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.

(CA-98-418-JFM)

Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 18, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roy Horton, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United States

Attorney, Larry David Adams, Assistant United States Attorney,

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Roy Horton appeals from the district court’s order dismissing

his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) petition. The claim

raised by Horton was addressed on the merits in his direct appeal.

See United States v. Horton, No. 95-5880 (4th Cir. Feb. 24, 1997)

(unpublished). This court will not reconsider the issue on collateral review, absent an intervening change in the law. See Boeckenhaupt v. United States, 537 F.2d 1182, 1183 (4th Cir. 1976). There

has been no such change. Therefore, we affirm the dismissal of

Horton’s petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED