alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dr. Robert S. Pope

Dr. Robert Pope, a member of the Senior Executive Service (SES), is the Director of 

the Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) Directorate for the Defense Threat Reduction 

Agency (DTRA). In his role as the Director, he executes the CTR mission of working 

with international partners to eliminate weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and 

related materials, including delivery systems, to provide safe and secure storage for 

materials of concern, and to detect and prevent WMD proliferation or the spread of 

especially dangerous diseases. 

Dr. Pope was promoted to SES in November 2017 following his retirement from the 

U.S. Air Force after more than 26 years of active military service. In his final military

assignment, he served in three positions at DTRA, culminating as the Deputy Director

of the Operations, Readiness, and Exercises Directorate, leading three departments

including CTR, to innovate, develop, and execute global counter WMD solutions.

Previous positions include Deputy Director of the CTR Department and Chief of CTR’s

Program Integration Division.

In his earlier military assignments, Dr. Pope was the Chief of the Nuclear

Development Branch at the Air Force Technical Application Center’s Technical Operations Division, developing new

radiochemical procedures to support U.S. monitoring of international nuclear weapons treaties. He was the Chief, LongRange Strategy and Policy, Headquarters, United States Air Forces in Europe (USAFE), where he developed 

transformational concepts to meet the Command’s evolving theater missions. As USAFE’s Chief of Counterproliferation 

Plans and Policy, he developed the Command’s guidance to counter WMD, including defensive measures, counterforce 

operations, and consequence management. He was the Chief of Research and Assessment for the Directorate of Public

Affairs and Directorate of Strategic Communication, Office of the Secretary of the Air Force in the Pentagon, where he led 

social science research to assess the quantitative and qualitative effects of Air Force messages. He served in several

positions at Headquarters U.S. Central Command, culminating as Deputy Chief of the Security Cooperation Division,

guiding security cooperation efforts across the Central Command Area of Responsibility.

Dr. Pope holds a Bachelor of Science in Physics from Michigan State University in Lansing, a Master of Science in

Nuclear Weapon Effects Physics from the Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, a

Doctor of Philosophy in Physics from the Air Force Institute of Technology, and a Master of Military Operational Art and 

Science from the Air Command and Staff College, Maxwell Air force Base, Alabama. He was also a National Defense 

Fellow in the International Security Program of the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard’s

Kennedy School, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 

January 2022
#### Rick MURPHY, DBA Pinnacle Management Group, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ACW CBP MAINE LLC, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-16048

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted October 20, 2017 * San Francisco, California

Filed October 24, 2017

*864Kimberly A. Warshawsky, Ballard Spahr LLP, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellant

Jonathan Brinson, Polsinelli PC, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: WALLACE and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI,** Judge.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Rick Murphy (“Murphy”) appeals from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of ACW CBP Maine LLC (“ACW”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. We review the summary judgement de novo, construing the facts and drawing all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party. Earl v. Nielsen Media Research, Inc., 658 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir. 2011).

1. The district court properly entered summary judgment in favor of ACW on Murphy’s breach of contract claim. The parties agree Maine law governs this action. Section 13004 of Maine’s Real Estate Brokerage Licensing Act, Me. Stat. tit. 32, § 13004, precludes a party from maintaining an action for a real estate broker’s fee, unless the party is a licensed real estate broker in Maine. Because Murphy did not prove licensure in Maine, he is precluded from maintaining this action.

2. The district court properly entered summary judgment in favor of ACW on Murphy’s unjust enrichment claim. Section 13004 prohibits maintaining “any action,” including equitable actions, for recovery of broker’s fees. Because Murphy did not prove his licensure in Maine, his equitable claim is “statutorily barred.” See Smith v. Cannell, 723 A.2d 876, 880 (Me. 1999) (emphasis original).

3. Murphy’s argument that section 13004 only bars him from bringing an action in Maine state court, but not elsewhere, is incorrect. Section 13004 is Maine substantive law, and so a federal court sitting in diversity applies that law as a Maine state court would apply it. See Gasperini v. Ctr. for Humanities, Inc., 518 U.S. 415, 426-28, 116 S.Ct. 2211, 135 L.Ed.2d 659 (1996). Thus, because Murphy’s claim would be barred in Maine state court, it is barred in federal court as well. Guaranty Trust Co. of N.Y. v. York, 326 U.S. 99, 109, 65 S.Ct. 1464, 89 L.Ed. 2079 (1945) (“[Wjhere a *865federal court is exercising jurisdiction solely because of the diversity of citizenship of the parties, the outcome of the litigation in the federal court should be substantially the same, so far as legal rules determine the outcome of a litigation, as it would be if tried in a State court.”).

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

ERICK HERRERA, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

No. 14-50231 

D.C. No. 3:13-cr-02818-BEN 

Southern District of California, 

San Diego 

ORDER 

Before: FISHER, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges. 

memorandum disposition is filed concurrently with this order. As so revised, the 

sentence imposed is AFFIRMED. 

No further petitions for rehearing will be entertained. 

FILED

JUL 21 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS 
 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

ERICK HERRERA, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

No. 14-50231 

D.C. No. 3:13-cr-02818-BEN 

MEMORANDUM* 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of California 

Roger T. Benitez, District Judge, Presiding 

Submitted July 20, 2015** 

Before: FISHER, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges. 

Erick Herrera appeals from the district court

46-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for importation of 

heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 

U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. 

 

 

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

FILED

JUL 21 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS 
 2 14-50231

denial of a minor role reduction, 

arguing that the court incorrectly compared him to a hypothetical average courier. 

uidelines de novo. See 

United States v. Rodriguez-Castro, 641 F.3d 1189, 1192 (9th Cir. 2011). In 

evaluating whether a defendant is a minor participant, the district court must 

compare s conduct and that of the other participants in the same 

offense. United States v. Rojas-Millan, 234 F.3d 464, 473 (9th Cir. 2000) 

(internal quotations omitted). suggestion that Herrera ought to 

be compared to a hypothetical average courier was, therefore, incorrect. See id. 

H s error was harmless because the record reflects that the 

court was aware of the other participants in the offense and agreed with the 

g substantially less culpable than the average 

in the offense given his quasi-supervisory role over L.G. See

U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(A). The district court also properly cited the quantity 

of drugs transported and the minor role 

adjustment. See United States v. Hurtado, 760 F.3d 1065, 1069 (9th Cir. 2014), 

cert. denied, 135 S. Ct. 1467 (2015) (quantity of drugs and the amount paid to the 

defendant are facts that alone may justify denial of a minor role . 
 3 14-50231

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 13 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 13

 Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States with 
                     respect to the right to life.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 1997

   Mrs. Emerson introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States with 
                     respect to the right to life.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid only when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the 
several States within seven years after the date of final passage of 
this joint resolution:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. With respect to the right to life, the word `person' 
as used in this article and in the fifth and fourteenth articles of 
amendment applies to all human beings irrespective of age, health, 
function, or condition of dependency, including their unborn offspring 
at every state of their biological development.
    ``Section 2. No unborn person shall be deprived of life by any 
person: Provided, however, That nothing in this article shall prohibit 
a law permitting only those medical procedures required to prevent the 
death of the mother of an unborn person: Provided further, That nothing 
in this article shall limit the liberty of a mother with respect to the 
unborn offspring of the mother conceived as a result of rape or incest.
    ``Section 3. The Congress and the several States shall have power 
to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
ex102.htm


 


 


 










Re: Service about being independent director, Chairman of the Nominating and Compensation Committee, and member of the Audit Committee of China Pharma Holdings, Inc.







December 19, 2013







Dear Mr. Yingwen Zhang,







On behalf of the Board of Directions and the Company, I am pleased to welcome you to join the Board of the China Pharma Holdings, Inc. as an independent director, Chairman of the Nominating and Compensation Committee, and member of the Audit Committee. I look forward to working with you. Your starting date will be the date of the board approves your engagement and your engagement for this term will end on the date of the next annual shareholders meeting.







Your compensation will consist of the following:


 



1)  A retainer of RMB 40,000 per year, payable quarterly within 5 days of the end of the quarter;









If you agree to the terms and conditions stated above, please sign and date this letter below.







I look forward to working with you and sincerely hope that your service will be enjoyable and rewarding.







Sincerely

















Chairman of the Board


China Pharma Holdings, Inc.












Response:


This letter correctly sets forth the understanding of Mr. Yingwen Zhang.












By:  /s/ Yingwen Zhang


 Yingwen Zhang


Date: 12/19/13
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of CHDT Corporation on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2009, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Report”), I, Gerry McClinton, Chief Operating Officer of the
Company of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify
that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.








/s/ Gerry
McClinton


Gerry
McClinton


Chief
Operating Officer, Director


(Principal
Operations Executive)








November
16, 2009








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                       Consent of Independent Accountants

     We hereby consent to the use in this Amendment No. 5 to Registration
Statement on Form S-4 of our report dated November 20, 2002 relating to the
financial statements of Hanover Equipment Trust 2001B, which appears in such
Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading
"Experts" in such Registration Statement.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas
February 7, 2003
Exhibit 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 of SailPoint Technologies Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Cam McMartin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Date: March 19, 2018

By: /s/ Cam McMartin

Cam McMartin

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
third quarter 1995 10-Q for LabOne, Inc. and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000816151
<NAME> LABONE, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       3,191,301
<SECURITIES>                                35,806,334
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,470,418
<ALLOWANCES>                                   199,975
<INVENTORY>                                  1,387,045
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            51,480,075
<PP&E>                                      52,846,614
<DEPRECIATION>                              35,765,339
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              72,384,546
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,439,471
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       150,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  66,795,075
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                72,384,546
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            42,968,006
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,449,025
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,842,818
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,401,371
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,441,447
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,441,447
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19
        

</TABLE>
S E P T E M B E R 2 0 2 1

EAC's Testing and Certification Program -

This document is a Testing and

Certification 101 overview of the program

in place to test and certify election

equipment.

Local Election Officials' Guide to

Redistricting - This guide helps election

officials prepare for and implement

redistricting requirements and changes

in their jurisdictions.

Chain of Custody Best Practices - This

report outlines items election officials

should consider when developing or

revising their chain of custody

procedures for physical election

materials, voting systems, and the use of

third-party auditors for conducting

audits and electronic discovery.

EAC MONTHLY

UPDATES & EVENTS

To help keep election officials up to date on new resources and upcoming

events from the EAC, we are sending brief monthly updates in addition to

our quarterly newsletters. For regular updates, please visit eac.gov, or

follow us on Twitter or Facebook.

States can submit data updates for the 2020 EAVS report to research@eac.gov by the

following deadlines: September 30, 2021, December 31, 2021, or March 31, 2022. For more

information, states should review the Post-Reporting Matters section of A Guide to the

Election Administration and Voting Survey.

The 2020 EAVS report is now available and preparations for the 2022 EAVS

have begun including a review of 2020 survey administration, a working

group focused on enhancing Section A, and the public comment period for

the 2022 questionnaire.

NEW EAC RESOURCES
S E P T E M B E R 2 0 2 1

RECENT EAC EVENTS

Moving VVSG 2.0 Forward virtual meeting

was livestreamed to the EAC’s YouTube

channel on September 8.

The EAC hosted the Roundtable

Discussion: 2020 EAVS and 2020 Elections

Lessons Learned on August 17.

NEW VIDEO SERIES

The EAC’s video series

“Serving Voters with

Disabilities” covers voting

accessibility challenges

and technology solutions,

absentee and vote by

mail barriers for voters

with disabilities, and

barriers to accessible

voting and solutions from

the perspectives of

advocates and election

officials. The complete

playlist is available on the

EAC’s YouTube Channel.

National Disability Voter Registration Week

(September 13-20)

National Voter Registration Day

(September 28)

Vote Early Day (October 23)

Commissioner Ben Hovland held a

virtual discussion on how election

officials can prepare for their

participation in civic holidays and

engage voters. For best practices and

new ideas on ways to participate,

watch the full video here.

UPCOMING CIVIC HOLIDAYS

www.eac.gov

clearinghouse@eac.gov

@eacgov1

@us.eac

@EACgov
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 19

- 940

_____________________________ A USTIN L EVI L ITTLE , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. William E. Davis , Judge

. August 22, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , O STERHAUS , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Julian Markham, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
(logo) Rialto

          CAPITAL

 

 

 

2014 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)

 

 

                Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of November 1, 2014 by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as  Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC as Trust Advisor, and Wilmington Trust, National Association as Trustee relating to the WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2014-C24, Commercial Mortgage Pass-through Certificates, Series 2014-C24  **(WFRBS 2014-C24)**

 

                

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.        All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2.        A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of November 18, 2014 to December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3.        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

 

 

Certified by:  /s/ Adam Singer                                                                 Date:  March 5, 2015

                     Adam Singer, Managing Director
No. 11-10444.

#### Williams v. Tamez, Warden.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Bella Costa Designs Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Yearly Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended October 31, 2015 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/Nelson Perez

Nelson Perez

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer

 

September 16, 2016