alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.2

                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

   We hereby consent to all references to Ryder Scott Company, L.P. and/or the
reports prepared by Ryder Scott Company, L.P. entitled "Estimated Future
Reserves and Income Attributable to Certain Leasehold and Royalty Interests SEC
Case as of December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002" in the Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2002 and to the incorporation by reference into Spinnaker
Exploration Company's previously filed Registration Statement No. 333-89894 on
Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-89779 and 333-36592 and 333-61888
on Form S-8.

                                          RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.

March 25, 2003
Exhibit 10.4(b)

 

	

    	
Sydling Futures Management LLC

1285 Avenue of the Americas, 13th Floor

New York, NY 10019
    


 

June 24, 2013

 

Anthony Annunziato

AAA Capital Management Advisors, LTD

1300 Post Oak Blvd

Suite 350

Houston, TX 77056

 

Re:                             AAA Energy Opportunities Fund LLC

Sydling AAA Master Fund LLC

 

Dear Mr. Annunziato:

 

The Trading Advisory Agreements (the “Agreements”) among the above named funds, Sydling Futures Management LLC and AAA Capital Management Advisors, Ltd. expire June 30, 2013.  Please accept this letter as a renewal of the Agreements and all terms for an additional twelve months to expire on June 30, 2014.

 

Please acknowledge this renewal by signing below and returning to my attention at jennifer.magro@ubs.com.

 

 

	
Best regards,
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Jennifer Magro
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Jennifer Magro
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
ACKNOWLEDGED BY:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ A. Anthony Annunziato
    	
 
    
	
Signature
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
A.Anthony Annunziato
    	
 
    
	
Print Name
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          29,911
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,496,220
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,034,952
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,039,582
<PP&E>                                       6,345,939
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,790,175
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,596,844
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,774,900
<BONDS>                                      1,629,215
<COMMON>                                         5,302
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,029,427
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,596,844
<SALES>                                     12,404,180
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,404,180
<CGS>                                        9,063,379
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,063,379
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               326,762
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             227,633
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,114,007
<INCOME-TAX>                                   427,603
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            686,404
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   686,404
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
        

</TABLE>
1

Damberg, Rich

From: Brachtl, Megan

Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 2:48 PM

To: Szabo, Aaron

Cc: Ling, Michael; Damberg, Rich; Schillo, Bruce; Frey, Nathan J.

Subject: revised draft NPRM package for PM2.5 NAAQS implementation

Attachments: Feb 2015 to Sep 2014 PM25 impl rule REDLINE for OMB.pdf

Importance: High

Aaron – Attached is the latest version, in redline/strikeout format, of the PM2.5 implementation rule. It reflects the

changes discussed with you and other interagency reviewers since the package was originally submitted to OMB on

September 23, 2014. It also reflects edits made by EPA independent of the interagency review process in order to

correct typographical errors and to help clarify options or our rationale for options included in the proposal. We have

flagged in the right margin those edits made in response to interagency comments. Please note that some of the longer

passages of text inserted in this draft in response to interagency comments may be slightly different from the language

we sent to you in a separate “response to comment” document on 2/13/15. These modifications were made in an effort

to improve clarity or accuracy of the new text.

Please let us know if you have any questions.

Best regards,

Megan

Megan V. Brachtl, Group Leader

State and Local Programs Group

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

(919) 541‐2648

brachtl.megan@epa.gov
AMENDMENT NO. 1







SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549








FORM 10-QSB








QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D)


OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003











Commission file number 0-15932





BF ENTERPRISES, INC.


(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)


DELAWARE
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
94-3038456
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)100 Bush Street
Suite 1250
San Francisco, California 94104
(Address of principal executive offices)


Issuer's telephone number, including area code (415) 989-6580











Check whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the past 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No





Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock as of November 13, 2003:





3,506,128 shares of $.10 par value Common Stock














1




SIGNATURES
 
 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
  
 **BF ENTERPRISES, INC.**Date: November 13, 2003
By:
/s/ Brian P. BurnsChairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer Date: November 13, 2003
By:
/s/  S. Douglas PostVice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
  2





Exhibit 32.2 Certification of CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) this Quarterly Report of BF Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company and its results of operations as of and for the periods covered therein.





**BF ENTERPRISES, INC.**Date: November 13, 2003
By:
/s/ S. Douglas PostVice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.











3
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Threat Reduction Agency 

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  DTRA Leadership             
  -  DTRA History             
  -  Mission             
  -  Strategic Initiatives             
  -  Foreign Malign Influence             
  -  Agency Overview Brief (pdf)             
  -  Agency Financial Report 
-  Careers & Opportunities    -  Your Civilian Career             
  -  Your Military Career             
  -  Welcome Aboard             
  -  Diversity and Inclusion 
-  Business    -  DTRA Contract Award Data             
  -  Office of Small Business             
  -  Mentor Protege Program 
-  News & Media    -  Press Center 
-  Contact Us		 
-  Joint Operations Center		 

# Foreign Malign Influence Fact Sheets

May 15, 2023

 Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) Ukraine Factsheet 

                                Since 2005, the program assisted the Ukrainian government in converting former Soviet biological weapons (BW) research facilities to support peaceful and safe biological detection and diagnostic capabilities and reduce the threats posed by dangerous pathogens, whether they are naturally occurring, accidental, or intentional.            

### Stay Connected

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
EXHIBIT 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
                 PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER (ACTING)
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Douglas Mitchell, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Simtek Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the three month period
ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Simtek Corporation.






/s/ Douglas Mitchell
---------------------------------------
Douglas Mitchell
Chief Executive Officer, President and
Chief Financial Officer (acting)
November 4, 2004
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adiya Thomas GRAHAM, a.k.a. Adyia Thomas Graham, “Gat”, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-30231

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*876Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed December 20, 2017

Leah K. Bolstad, Assistant U.S. Attorney, United States District Court, Mark 0. Hatfield United States Courthouse, Portland, OR, Kelly A. Zusman, Assistant U.S. Attorney, DOJ-USAO, Portland, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Gary Bertoni, Bertoni Law PC, Portland, OR, for Defendant-Appellant

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable, for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Adiya Thomas Graham appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 78-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

Graham challenges the district court’s imposition of a four-level increase to his offense level under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B). We review the district court’s identification and interpretation of the correct sentencing guideline de novo, its findings of fact for clear error, and its application of the Guidelines to the facts for abuse of discretion. *See United States v. Gasca-Ruiz,*852 F.3d 1167, 1170 (9th Cir. 2017) (en banc).

The district court did not clearly err in finding, based on the circumstantial evidence presented by the government at sentencing, that Graham more likely than not committed the Oregon felony offense of unlawful use of a weapon under Oregon Revised Statutes § 166.220. *See United States v. Newhoff,*627 F.3d 1163, 1170 (9th Cir. 2010) (upholding upward adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) based on reasonable inferences drawn from the circumstantial evidence presented). The district court did not abuse its discretion in applying the Guidelines to the facts of this case and imposing the four-level increase to Graham’s offense level.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.5

                        CONSENT OF HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in the
Registration Statement (Form S-3, Registration No: 333-99579) and related
Prospectus of Harken Energy Corporation, a Delaware corporation.


                                                  /s/ Haynes and Boone, LLP
                                                  ------------------------------

Fort Worth, Texas
December 23, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
first quarter 1997 Form 10-Q for LabOne, Inc. and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000816151
<NAME> LABONE, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       4,121,920
<SECURITIES>                                20,342,910
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,714,588
<ALLOWANCES>                                   795,368
<INVENTORY>                                  1,958,507
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            40,641,439
<PP&E>                                      53,442,902
<DEPRECIATION>                              36,205,721
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              64,586,859
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,159,110
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       150,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  57,277,749
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                64,586,859
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,739,985
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,450,105
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,287,275
<INCOME-TAX>                                   927,793
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,359,482
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,359,482
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
        

</TABLE>
#### James Wesley BILYEU *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 98-1480

987 S.W.2d 277

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered April 15, 1999

Q. *Byrum Hurst, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Mark Prior,*Att’y Gen., by: O. *Milton Fine II,*Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.

Per Curiam.

James Wesley Bilyeu was found guilty in 1996 of second-degree murder and sentenced to thirty years’ imprisonment. A fine of $15,000 was also imposed. The court of appeals affirmed. *Bilyeu v. State,*CACR 97-505 (February 4, 1998).

Bilyeu subsequently filed in the trial court a timely petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule 37. The petition was denied without a hearing, and the appeal of that order has been lodged here. The appellee now seeks by motion to *305remand the matter to the trial court for written findings of fact. The appellant agrees that written findings should have been entered but contends that any order from this court should also include instructions to hold an evidentiary hearing.

The order entered in the trial court was devoid of the written findings required by Rule 37.3(a). The order in its entirety reads:

> Now on this 26th day of May, 98, the court upon consideration of the petition for postconviction relief filed herein by the defendant should be and hereby is denied and dismissed.

 While we have affirmed the denial of Rule 37 petitions notwithstanding the trial court’s failure to make written findings as required by Rule 37.3(a), we have done so only where it can be determined from the record that the petition is wholly without merit or where the allegations in the petition are such that it is conclusive on the face of the petition that no relief is warranted. *Long v. State,*294 Ark. 362, 742 S.W.2d 942 (1988), citing *Rawls v. State,*264 Ark. 954, 581 S.W.2d 311 (1979); *Smith v. State,*290 Ark. 90, 717 S.W.2d 193 (1986). Here, there are allegations contained in the petition for postconviction relief which are supported by assertions of fact which preclude summary dismissal of the petition. Accordingly, we grant the appellee’s motion to remand the matter to the trial court for written findings. We leave the decision of whether the allegations warrant an evidentiary hearing to the trial court which has discretion pursuant to Rule 37.3(a) to decide whether the files or records are sufficient to sustain the court’s findings without a hearing. *See LunaHolbird v. State,*315 Ark. 735, 871 S.W.2d 328 (1994).

Motion granted.
# Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali C 113A/27 t

| | ISSN 1977-0987 |
| --- | --- |
| Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali
  tal-Unjoni Ewropea | C 113A |
| | |
| Edizzjoni bil-Malti | Informazzjoni u Avviżi | Volum 6127 ta' Marzu 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0987

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali

tal-Unjoni Ewropea

C 113A

Edizzjoni bil-Malti

Informazzjoni u Avviżi

Volum 6127 ta' Marzu 2018

---

| Avviż Nru | Werrej | Paġna |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Avviżi |
| | PROĊEDURI AMMINISTRATTIVI |
| | L-Uffiċċju Ewropew għas-Selezzjoni tal-Persunal (EPSO) |
| 2018/C 113 A/01 | Lista ta’ Riserva — Kompetizzjoni ġenerali EPSO/AD/336/16 — Ġuristi Lingwisti (AD 7) tal-lingwa Maltija (MT) | 1 |

Avviż Nru

Werrej

Paġna

V   Avviżi

PROĊEDURI AMMINISTRATTIVI

L-Uffiċċju Ewropew għas-Selezzjoni tal-Persunal (EPSO)

2018/C 113 A/01

Lista ta’ Riserva — Kompetizzjoni ġenerali EPSO/AD/336/16 — Ġuristi Lingwisti (AD 7) tal-lingwa Maltija (MT)

1

---

| MT | |
| --- | --- |

MT

---

V Avviżi

PROĊEDURI AMMINISTRATTIVI

L-Uffiċċju Ewropew għas-Selezzjoni tal-Persunal (EPSO)

| 27.3.2018 | MT | Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea | CA 113/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2018

MT

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea

CA 113/1

---

LISTA TA’ RISERVA (1)

Kompetizzjoni ġenerali EPSO/AD/336/16

Ġuristi Lingwisti (AD 7) tal-lingwa Maltija (MT)

(2018/C 113 A/01)

| BONELLO | Claire |
| --- | --- |
| BONELLO | Franklin |
| BONNICI | Marie Chantelle |
| FARRUGIA | Maria Carmen |
| GRECH | Jeanella |
| MICALLEF GRIMAUD | Ylenia |
| SCHEMBRI | Claudia |

BONELLO

Claire

BONELLO

Franklin

BONNICI

Marie Chantelle

FARRUGIA

Maria Carmen

GRECH

Jeanella

MICALLEF GRIMAUD

Ylenia

SCHEMBRI

Claudia

Il-validità tal-listi se tiskadi fit-30 ta’ Ġunju 2021.

---

(1)  Fuq it-talba ta' persuna li tkun temmet il-kompetizzjoni b'suċċess, isimha ma jkunx ippubblikat.

---
# Eiropas Savienības C 168/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0952 |
| --- | --- |
| Eiropas Savienības
  Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 168 |
| | |
| Izdevums latviešu valodā | Informācija un paziņojumi | 61. gadagājums2018. gada 15. maijs |

ISSN 1977-0952

Eiropas Savienības

Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 168

Izdevums latviešu valodā

Informācija un paziņojumi

61. gadagājums2018. gada 15. maijs

---

| Paziņojums Nr. | Saturs | Lappuse |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Atzinumi |
| | ADMINISTRATĪVAS PROCEDŪRAS |
| 2018/C 168/01 | Uzaicinājumi iesniegt priekšlikumus par iniciatīvu WiFi4EU (interneta savienojamības veicināšana vietējās kopienās) Eiropas infrastruktūras savienošanas instrumenta ietvaros Eiropas telesakaru tīklu jomā (Grozīta 2017. gada EISI Telesakaru darba programma – Komisijas Īstenošanas lēmums C(2017) 7732) | 1 |

Paziņojums Nr.

Saturs

Lappuse

V   Atzinumi

ADMINISTRATĪVAS PROCEDŪRAS

2018/C 168/01

Uzaicinājumi iesniegt priekšlikumus par iniciatīvu WiFi4EU (interneta savienojamības veicināšana vietējās kopienās) Eiropas infrastruktūras savienošanas instrumenta ietvaros Eiropas telesakaru tīklu jomā (Grozīta 2017. gada EISI Telesakaru darba programma – Komisijas Īstenošanas lēmums C(2017) 7732)

WiFi4EU

1

---

| LV | |
| --- | --- |

LV

---

V Atzinumi

ADMINISTRATĪVAS PROCEDŪRAS

| 15.5.2018 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 168/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2018

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 168/1

---

Uzaicinājumi iesniegt priekšlikumus par iniciatīvu WiFi4EU (interneta savienojamības veicināšana vietējās kopienās) Eiropas infrastruktūras savienošanas instrumenta ietvaros Eiropas telesakaru tīklu jomā

(Grozīta 2017. gada EISI Telesakaru darba programma – Komisijas Īstenošanas lēmums C(2017) 7732)

(2018/C 168/01)

Ar šo Eiropas Komisijas Komunikācijas tīklu, satura un tehnoloģiju ģenerāldirektorāts izsludina šādu uzaicinājumu iesniegt priekšlikumus iniciatīvai WiFi4EU, lai piešķirtu dotācijas projektiem atbilstīgi prioritātēm un mērķiem, kas noteikti grozītajā 2017. gada darba programmā Eiropas telesakaru tīklu jomā, kura ietilpst Eiropas infrastruktūras savienošanas instrumentā.

Šis ir pirmais uzaicinājums (WIFI4EU-2017-1) iesniegt priekšlikumus iniciatīvai WiFi4EU (interneta savienojamības veicināšana vietējās kopienās).

Kopējais paredzamais budžets, kas būs pieejams priekšlikumiem, kurus atlasīs saskaņā ar šo uzaicinājumu, ir EUR 17 745 000.

Priekšlikumu iesniegšanas termiņš ir 2018. gada 15. jūnijs.

Priekšlikumus iesniedz, izmantojot WiFi4EU portālu: https://www.wifi4eu.eu/.

Attiecīgā uzaicinājuma dokumentācija ir pieejama INEA vietnē: https://ec.europa.eu/inea/en/connecting-europe-facility/cef-telecom/wifi4eu.

---