alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0496 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JONATHAN WILLIAM PRESLEY,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including February 2 5 , 2022 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 19 2022

01/19/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0496
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed 

August 26, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00669-CR

NO. 14-14-00670-CR

IN RE DECARLOS MONTRAY GARRETT, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

338th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 0870048 and 0886344

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On August 18, 2014, relator Decarlos Montray Garrett filed a petition for 

writ of mandamus in this court pertaining to two underlying criminal cases. See 

Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks 
2

this court to compel the Honorable Brock Thomas, presiding judge of the 338th 

District Court of Harris County, to rule on a motion for post-conviction forensic 

DNA testing pursuant to Chapter 64 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.

To be entitled to mandamus relief with respect to a criminal law matter, 

relator must show that he has no adequate remedy at law to redress his alleged 

harm, and that what he seeks to compel is a ministerial act. In re State ex rel. 

Weeks, 391 S.W.3d 117, 122 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (orig. proceeding). “[A] trial 

court has a ministerial duty to rule upon a motion that is properly and timely 

presented to it for a ruling . . . .” In re State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Judicial Dist. 

Court of Appeals at Texarkana, 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007)

(orig. proceeding). Thus, in appropriate cases, mandamus may issue to compel a 

trial court to act on a motion. 

Relator, however, has not demonstrated his entitlement to mandamus relief.

“The relator generally must bring forward all that is necessary to establish a claim 

for relief.” In re Potts, 399 S.W.3d 685, 686 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 

2013, orig. proceeding); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k)(1)(a), 52.7(a)(1).

Although relator asserts in his petition that he filed a motion for DNA testing, 

relator includes no documentation in his appendix demonstrating that such a 

motion was filed with the trial court, let alone brought to the trial court’s attention. 

There is no basis for this court to conclude on the limited information filed by 

relator that the trial court has failed or refused to perform a ministerial duty.

Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. 
3

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Busby.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frankie Cornell ELLIS, Jr., a/k/a Nitty, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-7114

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 21, 2017

Decided: December 28, 2017

Frankie Cornell Ellis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Howarth Bennett, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, North Carolina; Seth Morgan Wood, Assistant United States Attorney, Kimberly Ann Moore, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina; Imelda Jean Pate, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY, Kinston, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*774PER CURIAM:

Frankie Cornell Ellis, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). "When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ellis has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of BMW Vehicle Lease Trust 2015-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and
 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
   By: /s/ Ritu Chandy
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sizeler Property Investors, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Sidney W. Lassen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                     /s/ Sidney W. Lassen
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Sidney W. Lassen
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                     November 12, 2002
U.S. ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY: U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Sunshine Act Notice; Notice of Public Meeting Agenda 

SUMMARY: Public Meeting: U.S. Election Assistance Commission Standards Board Annual 

Meeting

DATES: Thursday, June 17, 2021 1:30 PM-4:30PM Eastern

ADDRESSES:

Virtual via Zoom

The meeting is open to the public and will be livestreamed on the U.S. Election Assistance 

Commission YouTube Channel: 

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpN6i0g2rlF4ITWhwvBwwZw

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kristen Muthig, Telephone: (202) 897-9285, Email: kmuthig@eac.gov 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Purpose: In accordance with the Government in the Sunshine Act (Sunshine Act), Public Law 

94-409, as amended (5 U.S.C. 552b), the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) will 

conduct a virtual annual meeting of the EAC Standards Board to conduct regular business, 

discuss EAC updates and upcoming programs, and discuss the Voluntary Voting System 

Guidelines (VVSG) 2.0 next steps. 

Agenda: The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) Standards Board will hold their 2021 

Annual Meeting primarily to discuss next steps regarding the recently approved VVSG 2.0 
Requirements, including the VVSG 2.0. lifecycle policy. This meeting will include a question 

and answer discussion between board members and EAC staff.

Board members will also review FACA Board membership guidelines and policies with EAC 

General Counsel and receive a general update about the EAC from the Executive Director

including potential new and updated EAC programing for the coming year. Board members will 

also discuss and provide input on the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s portion of 

the March 7, 2021 Executive Order on Promoting Access to Voting. The Board will also elect 

new members to the Executive Board Committee and consider amendments to the Bylaws.

Background: On February 10, 2021 the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) 

announced the adoption of the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG) 2.0; the VVSG 2.0 

is the fifth iteration of national level voting system standards. The Federal Election Commission 

published the first two sets of federal standards in 1990 and 2002. The EAC then adopted 

Version 1.0 of the VVSG on December 13, 2005. In an effort to update and improve version 1.0 

of the VVSG, on March 31, 2015, the EAC commissioners unanimously approved VVSG 1.1. 

The full agenda will be posted in advance on the EAC website: https://www.eac.gov. 

STATUS:

This meeting will be open to the public. 

Amanda Joiner, 

Associate Counsel,

U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
CHDT Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Laurie Holtz, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
hereby certify that:





(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Laurie
Holtz


Laurie
Holtz


Chief
Financial Officer, Director


(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)








August
14, 2008








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 159 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 159

 Honoring the memory of the victims of the Great Irish Potato Famine, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 25, 1997

 Mr. Lipinski (for himself, Mr. Payne, Mr. Meehan, Mr. Underwood, Mr. 
Blagojevich, Mr. Poshard, Mr. Watts of Oklahoma, Mr. Horn, Mr. Andrews, 
Mrs. Maloney of New York, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Markey, Mr. Gutierrez, Mrs. 
 Kelly, Mr. Bonior, Mr. Stearns, Mr. Doyle, Mr. Johnson of Wisconsin, 
  Mr. LaTourette, Mr. Holden, Mr. Davis of Virginia, Mrs. Kennelly of 
Connecticut, Mr. Manton, Mr. Gejdenson, Mr. Neal of Massachusetts, Mr. 
 Pallone, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. Kennedy of Rhode Island, Ms. Slaughter, and 
  Mr. Riggs) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
          referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Honoring the memory of the victims of the Great Irish Potato Famine, 
                        and for other purposes.

Whereas 150 years ago, Ireland was in the midst of ``Black '47'', the worst year 
        of the Great Irish Potato Famine;
Whereas between 1846 and 1850, an estimated 1,500,000 people died in Ireland 
        from starvation and disease and over 1,000,000 people emigrated from 
        Ireland to the United States and Canada to escape the famine; and
Whereas on June 1, 1997, in Millstreet, County Cork, Republic of Ireland, 
        British Prime Minister Tony Blair offered the first public apology from 
        the British Government for its lack of action during the famine: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) joins all people of Irish descent in honoring the 
        memory of the victims of the Great Irish Potato Famine;
            (2) honors the millions of brave emigrants and their 
        descendants who rose from the tragedy of the famine to make a 
        profound contribution to the United States; and
            (3) encourages the British and Irish governments to build 
        on the public apology from the British Government and make a 
        renewed effort for peace in Northern Ireland.
                                 <all>
```
# Euroopa Liidu C 168/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0898 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 168 |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 61. aastakäik15. mai 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0898

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 168

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

61. aastakäik15. mai 2018

---

| Teatis nr | Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Teated |
| | HALDUSMENETLUSED |
| 2018/C 168/01 | Konkursikutsed seoses WiFi4EU algatusega (internetiühenduse edendamine kohalikes kogukondades) Euroopa ühendamise rahastu raames üleeuroopaliste telekommunikatsioonivõrkude valdkonnas (Euroopa ühendamise rahastu 2017. aasta muudetud tööprogramm telekommunikatsioonivõrkude kohta – komisjoni rakendusotsus C(2017) 7732) | 1 |

Teatis nr

Sisukord

Lehekülg

V   Teated

HALDUSMENETLUSED

2018/C 168/01

Konkursikutsed seoses WiFi4EU algatusega (internetiühenduse edendamine kohalikes kogukondades) Euroopa ühendamise rahastu raames üleeuroopaliste telekommunikatsioonivõrkude valdkonnas (Euroopa ühendamise rahastu 2017. aasta muudetud tööprogramm telekommunikatsioonivõrkude kohta – komisjoni rakendusotsus C(2017) 7732)

1

---

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

V Teated

HALDUSMENETLUSED

| 15.5.2018 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | C 168/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2018

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

C 168/1

---

Konkursikutsed seoses WiFi4EU algatusega (internetiühenduse edendamine kohalikes kogukondades) Euroopa ühendamise rahastu raames üleeuroopaliste telekommunikatsioonivõrkude valdkonnas

(Euroopa ühendamise rahastu 2017. aasta muudetud tööprogramm telekommunikatsioonivõrkude kohta – komisjoni rakendusotsus C(2017) 7732)

(2018/C 168/01)

Euroopa Komisjoni sidevõrkude, sisu ja tehnoloogia peadirektoraat esitab järgmise konkursikutse WiFi4EU algatuse kohta, et anda Euroopa ühendamise rahastust toetusi projektidele vastavalt üleeuroopaliste telekommunikatsioonivõrkude 2017. aasta muudetud tööprogrammis kindlaks määratud prioriteetidele ja eesmärkidele.

Taotlusi oodatakse esimesele konkursikutsele (WIFI4EU-2017-1) internetiühenduse edendamiseks kohalikes kogukondades.

Selle konkursi põhjal väljavalitavate projektide jaoks ettenähtud soovituslik eelarve on kokku 17 745 000 eurot.

Taotluste esitamise tähtaeg on 15. juuni 2018.

Konkursitaotlused tuleb esitada WiFi4EU portaali kaudu: https://www.wifi4eu.eu/

Asjaomased projektikonkursi dokumendid on kättesaadavad Innovatsiooni ja Võrkude Rakendusameti (INEA) veebisaidil: https://ec.europa.eu/inea/en/connecting-europe-facility/cef-telecom/wifi4eu

---
#### 20/20 COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Randall BLEVINS; Kathy Digruilles; James Cobble; Brina Healy; Julia Mucheke-Barrett; Peter Saldoriga; Loren Simpson; Charles Smith; Benjamin *639Stanczik; Freddie Tubbs; Kyil Waits; Deborah Buffamanti; David Vine; Juan Castillo; Lennox Crawford; Thomas Demiris; Kimberly Koppelman; Redwan Negash, Defendants-Appellees

No. 17-10160

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 5, 2018

Gavin Samuel Martinson, Jeremy William Hays, Andrew Thomas Turner, Attorney, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak *&*Stewart, P.C., Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant

Andrew Ross Frisch, Esq., Morgan *&*Morgan, P.A., Plantation, FL, Jimmy Derek Braziel, Lee & Braziel, L.L.P., Dallas, TX, for Defendants-Appellees

Before WIENER, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

20/20 Communications appeals the order denying a preliminary injunction that would have prevented the defendants from arbitrating their claims against the plaintiff as a class and from asking an arbitrator to determine the availability of class arbitrations. Under the Federal Arbitration Act, with limited exceptions inapplicable here, we are not permitted to consider appeals from interlocutory orders that refuse to enjoin arbitrations. 9 U.S.C. § 16(b)(4) (2012).

We DISMISS for lack of jurisdiction.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.6

                              Consent of Appraiser

     We hereby consent to the references made to us and/or our appraisal by
Hanover Equipment Trust 2001A, Hanover Compressor Company and Hanover
Compression Limited Partnership on the cover page of and under the headings
"Prospectus Summary--The Operating Lease Transaction," "Risk Factors," and "The
Equipment" in the Prospectus constituting a part of this Amendment No. 4 to
Registration Statement on Form S-4.

                                             AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC.

                                             By:     /s/ T. Michael Rathburn
                                                --------------------------------
                                             Name:  T. Michael Rathburn
                                             Title: Associate General Counsel

Milwaukee, Wisconsin

January 10, 2003
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.6

                              Consent of Appraiser

     We hereby consent to the references made to us and/or our appraisal by
Hanover Equipment Trust 2001A, Hanover Compressor Company and Hanover
Compression Limited Partnership under the headings "Prospectus Summary--The
Operating Lease Transaction," "Risk Factors," and "The Equipment" in the
Prospectus constituting a part of this Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement
on Form S-4. We also consent to the filing as Exhibit 99.7 to such Registration
Statement of the Appraisal Report, dated as of August 16, 2001, covering
Synthetic Lease Portfolio Hanover Equipment Trust 2001A Natural Gas Compressors
prepared by us for Hanover Compression Limited Partnership providing a value of
not less than $309 million.

                                             AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC.

                                             By:     /s/ Dale J. Egan
                                                --------------------------------
                                             Name:  Dale J. Egan
                                             Title: General Counsel

Milwaukee, Wisconsin

May 24, 2002
Exhibit 99.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Carl Hull, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Applied Imaging Corp. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Applied Imaging Corp.


Date:

August 13, 2002



By:

/s/    CARL HULLCarl Hull President and Chief Executive Officer





I, Barry Hotchkies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Applied Imaging Corp. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Applied Imaging Corp.





Date:

August 13, 2002



By:

/s/    BARRY HOTCHKIESBarry Hotchkies Vice President, Chief Financial Officer