alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


                       WINDSWEPT ENVIORNMENTAL GROUP, INC.
          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Amendment No. 1. to the quarterly report of
Windswept Environmental Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 27, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Michael O'Reilly, the Chief
Executive Officer of the Company and Andrew C. Lunetta, the Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                   13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and results
                    of operations of the Company.

            A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Windswept Environmental Group, Inc. and will be retained by
Windswept Environmental Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

Date:  February 3, 2006

                                          /s/ Michael O'Reilly
                                         -----------------------
                                         Michael O'Reilly
                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                         (Principal Executive Officer)


                                          /s/ Andrew C. Lunetta
                                         -----------------------
                                         Andrew C. Lunetta
                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                         (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Brian Alleman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Simtek Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Simtek Corporation.



/s/Brian Alleman
------------------------------
Brian Alleman

Chief Financial Officer
November 11, 2005
IA

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 25

Making technical corrections to the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations

Act, 1997 (Public Law 104–208), and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 9, 1997

Mr. LIVINGSTON introduced the following joint resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making technical corrections to the Omnibus Consolidated

Appropriations Act, 1997 (Public Law 104–208), and

for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. Title III of the Departments of Com4 merce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Related

5 Agencies Appropriations Act, 1997 (as contained in DIVI6 SION A, TITLE I—OMNIBUS APPROPRIATIONS,

7 section 101(a) of the Omnibus Consolidated Appropria8 tions Act, 1997, Public Law 104–208) is amended under

9 the heading ‘‘COURTS OF APPEALS, DISTRICT COURTS,

10 AND OTHER JUDICIAL SERVICES—DEFENDER SERVICES’’
2

HJ 25 ATH

1 by striking ‘‘attorneys ap-’’ at the end and inserting the

2 following: ‘‘attorneys appointed to represent jurors in civil

3 actions for the protection of their employment, as author4 ized by 28 U.S.C. 1875(d); $308,000,000, to remain avail5 able until expended as authorized by 18 U.S.C.

6 3006A(i).’’. The foregoing amendment shall be considered

7 for all purposes to have taken effect on the date of enact8 ment of Public Law 104–208, and any actions taken prior

9 to the date of enactment of this section on the basis that

10 Public Law 104–208 should be interpreted as if it in11 cluded the amendment made by this section, if otherwise

12 valid, are ratified and approved by Congress.

13 SEC. 2. Title I of the Departments of Labor, Health

14 and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agen15 cies Appropriations Act, 1997 (as contained in DIVISION

16 A, TITLE I—OMNIBUS APPROPRIATIONS, section

17 101(e) of the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act,

18 1997, Public Law 104–208) is amended under the heading

19 ‘‘EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION—STATE

20 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE AND EMPLOYMENT SERVICE

21 OPERATIONS’’ by striking ‘‘$23,452,000’’ and inserting

22 ‘‘$173,452,000’’.

23 SEC. 3. Funds available for title IV–A–1 of the Ele24 mentary and Secondary Education Act in title III of the

25 Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and
3

HJ 25 ATH

1 Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act,

2 1997 (as contained in DIVISION A, TITLE I—OMNI3 BUS APPROPRIATIONS, section 101(e) of the Omnibus

4 Consolidated Appropriations Act, 1997, Public Law 104–

5 208) under the heading ‘‘SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PRO6 GRAMS’’ shall also be available for title IV–A–2 of the Ele7 mentary and Secondary Education Act: Provided, That,

8 of the funds under these headings in that Act available

9 July 1, 1997, through September 30, 1998, $25,000,000

10 shall instead be available October 1, 1996, through Sep11 tember 30, 1997.

Æ
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 11, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40056 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JUAN CARLOS RESENDEZ-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:06-CR-751

-------------------- Before JOLLY, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan Carlos Resendez-Hernandez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    Sep-30-1998
<CASH>                          3,673
<SECURITIES>                      697
<RECEIVABLES>                     103
<ALLOWANCES>                       0
<INVENTORY>                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   0
<PP&E>                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 23,518  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              0
<BONDS>                           719
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<COMMON>                          362
<OTHER-SE>                     21,070
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   23,518
<SALES>                         2,785
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                4,325
<CGS>                             587
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     587
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                1,504
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 39
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 2,195
<INCOME-TAX>                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             2,195
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                    2,195
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                     .23
        

</TABLE>
#### SONDRA G. STOLLAK *v.*JAY STEVEN STOLLAK

(AC 20589)

Foti, Schaller and Flynn, Js.

Submitted on briefs April 6

officially released May 8, 2001

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 3, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-271

Lower Tribunal Nos. F07-39881B; F07-39883

________________

Miguel Benitez,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose L. Fernandez, Judge.

Miguel Benitez, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE and GORDO, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See Sims v. State, 286 So. 3d 292, 293 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019) 

(holding that State v. Lewars, 259 So. 3d 793 (Fla. 2018) does not apply 

retroactively); Hutchins v. State, 45 Fla. L. Weekly D2582 (Fla. 3d DCA Nov. 

18, 2020).
EXHIBIT 31.2


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Trent J. Carman, certify that:

1.  I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-Q  of  Air  Methods
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material  fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made,  in  light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading  with  respect  to  the  period  covered  by  this  report;

3.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of,  and  for,  the  periods  presented  in  this  report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing  and  maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-15(e)  and  15d-15(e))  for  the  registrant and have:

     a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or  caused such
disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to  be designed under our supervision, to
ensure  that  material  information  relating  to  the registrant, including its
consolidated  subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly  during  the  period  in  which  this  report  is  being  prepared;

     b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures  and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of  the  disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by  this  report  based  on  such  evaluation;  and

     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the registrant's most recent
fiscal  quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's  auditors  and  the  audit  committee  of the registrant's board of
directors  (or  persons  performing  the  equivalent  functions):

     a)  All  significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation  of  internal  control  over  financial reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize  and  report  financial  information;  and

     b)  Any  fraud,  whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees  who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting.


Date: November 15, 2004

/s/ Trent J. Carman
    ------------------
Trent J. Carman
Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES
CODE)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Chadmoore Wireless Group, Inc. (the "Company"), in his
Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 as files with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "10-QSB Report") that to his knowledge:

     (1) the 10-QSB Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
         (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the 10-QSB Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date:  March 25, 2003

/s/  STEPHEN K. RADUSCH
-----------------------
Stephen K. Radusch, Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Chadmoore Wireless Group, Inc. and will be retained by Chadmoore
Wireless Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Bay Resources Ltd.
(the "Company") for the three months ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), the
undersigned, Peter Lee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the report fairly  presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 8, 2006

                                        Peter Lee
                                        ---------
                                        Peter Lee
                                        Director, Secretary and
                                        Chief Financial Officer



                                                                              22
Exhibit 31

Certification of Chief Executive Officer  Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Paul S. Viviano, certify that:



|                       |  |                                                                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 13, 2003 |  | /s/PAUL S. VIVIANOPaul S. Viviano President and Chief Executive
Officer

---

Certification of Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Kenneth S. Ord, certify that:



|                       |  |                                                                                     
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 13, 2003 |  | /s/KENNETH S. ORDKenneth S. Ord Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

---

QuickLinks
### ECONOMIC AND REGULATORY EVALUATION

Regulatory Evaluation Form , Revision 2 .0 Page 1 o f 1 7/26/2011 

### AD Title: Engine Fuel Manifold Docket No. FAA

- 2007

- 0096 Directorate Identifier: 2007

- NE
- 39

- AD Costs: Costs per Product (e.g., engine, propeller) Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

h ours Labor cost ( @ $80/hour) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

U.S. Registered Products Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet Replace f uel ma nifold assembly (optional) 6.00 $ 480.00 $50,000 $ 50,480.00 156 $ 7,874,880 Inspect for fuel leaks 1.0 $ 80.00 $0 $ 80.00 156 $ 12,480 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0



### Total Cost s of compliance for U

. S

. fleet: $ 7,887, 360



### Costs covered under warranty $ Special considerations for Econom ic Analysis : W ithout exchange of old parts 

### Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES explain below NO DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant? YES explain below NO Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES explain below NO
Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska w here aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES explain below NO 

### Explanation:
# Official Journal L 306/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 306 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5725 October 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 306

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5725 October 2014

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1132/2014 of 24 October 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1133/2014 of 24 October 2014 on the issue of licences for importing rice under the tariff quotas opened for the October 2014 subperiod by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1273/2011 | 4 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1132/2014 of 24 October 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1133/2014 of 24 October 2014 on the issue of licences for importing rice under the tariff quotas opened for the October 2014 subperiod by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1273/2011

4

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Lauralyn ("Laura") J. Remo

DOT,Office of Aviation Analysis, Air Carrier Fitness Division, X

- 56 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 Re: Island Air Express as US Mail Carrier Dear Mrs. Remo, I am writing this letter in support of Island Air Express as a dependable and safe air service to Klawock. I have either been living on Prince of Wales Island or making frequent trips to the Island since 1987 and continue to do so. In addition, I served as the school superintendent for the Kl awock City School District for a period of ten years. All of these experiences have been an excellent opportunity to observe multiple (countless) disruptions of mail service to Klawock and the subsequent cost in time, efficiency and actual dollar costs.
T he advent of IFR through Island Air Express is a historic step forward safer travel and dependable mail service. Both of these issues will immensely benefit all of the residents of the area. Island Air Express is clearly the best choice for delivery of ou r mail. Sincerely,

Morris D. Ververs, Ed.D. 31550 County Road 74 Simla, CO 80835
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     EXHIBIT 11

(11) COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE AMOUNTS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                               Six Months Ended             Three Months Ended
                                                   June 30                       June 30
                                        ---------------------------     ---------------------------
                                           1998            1997            1998            1997
                                        -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------
<S>                                      <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>        
Net loss                                 (3,706,456)     (9,728,789)     (1,907,310)     (8,395,182)

Preferred stock dividend                    (56,486)           --           (45,754)           --
                                        -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------
Adjusted net loss applicable to 
common shares                            (3,762,942)     (9,728,789)     (1,953,064)     (8,395,182)
                                        ===========     ===========     ===========     ===========

Weighted average common 
shares outstanding                       27,321,879      19,511,640      32,236,504      19,868,119

Common equivalent shares
representing shares issuable upon
exercise of stock options                37,519,693       8,249,292      37,519,693       8,249,292

Add back of common equivalent
shares due to antidilutive shares       (37,519,693)     (8,249,292)    (37,519,693)     (8,249,292)
                                        -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------
Weighted average common shares 
outstanding                              27,321,879      19,511,640      32,236,504      19,868,119
                                        ===========     ===========     ===========     ===========

Basic net loss per share                      (0.14)          (0.50)          (0.06)          (0.42)


Diluted net loss per share                    (0.14)          (0.50)          (0.06)          (0.42)
</TABLE>
# DTRA Sponsors Training Event in Thailand

/ Published March 20, 2024
www.dtra.mil