Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 67 / Thursday, April 7, 2022 / Proposed Rules 20367 

southeast to latitude 38°08′21.95′′ N, 

longitude 076°29′49.31′′ W; thence 

southwest to latitude 38°08′18.20′′ N, 

longitude 076°29′56.98′′ W, thence 

northwest to latitude 38°08′36.10′′ N, 

longitude 076°30′10.84′′ W; thence 

northeast to and terminating at the point 

of origin. 

(3) Buffer area. The buffer area is a 

polygon in shape measuring 

approximately 90 yards in all directions 

surrounding the entire race area 

described in paragraph (a)(2) of this 

section. The area is bounded by a line 

commencing near Hodgson Point at 

position latitude 38°08′43.58′′ N, 

longitude 076°30′02.12′′ W; thence 

southeast to latitude 38°08′21.12′′ N, 

longitude 076°29′44.81′′ W, thence 

southwest to latitude 38°08′14.68′′ N, 

longitude 076°29′58.24′′ W; thence 

northwest to latitude 38°08′35.95′′ N, 

longitude 076°30′14.33′′ W, thence 

northeast to and terminating at the point 

of origin. 

(4) Spectator area. The designated 

spectator area is a polygon in shape 

with its length measuring approximately 

700 yards and its width measuring 

approximately 300 yards at its northern 

portion and 150 yards at it southern 

portion. The area is bounded by a line 

commencing at position latitude 

38°08′46.86′′ N, longitude 076°29′51.07′′ 

W; thence southeast to latitude 

38°08′38.11′′ N, longitude 076°29′44.27′′ 

W; thence south to latitude 38°08′26.81′′ 

N, longitude 076°29′43.01′′ W; thence 

southwest to latitude 38°08′23.50′′ N, 

longitude 076°29′46.50′′ W, thence 

northwest to latitude 38°08′41.28′′ N, 

longitude 076°30′00.18′′ W, thence 

northeast to and terminating at the point 

of origin. 

(b) Definitions. As used in this 

section— 

Buffer area is a neutral area that 

surrounds the perimeter of the race area 

within the regulated area described by 

this section. The purpose of a buffer 

area is to minimize potential collision 

conflicts with marine event participants 

or high-speed powerboats and spectator 

vessels or nearby transiting vessels. This 

area provides separation between a race 

area and a specified spectator area or 

other vessels that are operating in the 

vicinity of the regulated area established 

by the special local regulations in this 

section. 

Captain of the Port (COTP) MarylandNational Capital Region means the 

Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Sector 

Maryland-National Capital Region or 

any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant 

or petty officer who has been authorized 

by the COTP to act on his behalf. 

Event Patrol Commander or Event 

PATCOM means a commissioned, 

warrant, or petty officer of the U.S. 

Coast Guard who has been designated 

by the Commander, Coast Guard Sector 

Maryland-National Capital Region. 

Official patrol means any vessel 

assigned or approved by Commander, 

Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National 

Capital Region with a commissioned, 

warrant, or petty officer on board and 

displaying a Coast Guard ensign. 

Participant means all persons and 

vessels registered with the event 

sponsor as participating in the 

‘‘Southern Maryland Boat Club Piney 

Point Rumble on the River Regatta’’ 

event, or otherwise designated by the 

event sponsor as having a function tied 

to the event. 

Race area is an area described by a 

line bound by coordinates provided in 

latitude and longitude that outlines the 

boundary of a race area within the 

regulated area defined by this section. 

Spectator means a person or vessel 

not registered with the event sponsor as 

participants or assigned as official 

patrols. 

Spectator area is an area described by 

a line bound by coordinates provided in 

latitude and longitude that outlines the 

boundary of a spectator area within the 

regulated area defined by this section. 

(c) Special local regulations. (1) The 

COTP Maryland-National Capital 

Region or Event PATCOM may forbid 

and control the movement of all vessels 

and persons, including event 

participants, in the regulated area 

described in paragraph (a)(1) of this 

section. When hailed or signaled by an 

official patrol, a vessel or person in the 

regulated area shall immediately 

comply with the directions given by the 

patrol. Failure to do so may result in the 

Coast Guard expelling the person or 

vessel from the area, issuing a citation 

for failure to comply, or both. The COTP 

Maryland-National Capital Region or 

Event PATCOM may terminate the 

event, or a participant’s operations at 

any time the COTP Maryland-National 

Capital Region or Event PATCOM 

believes it necessary to do so for the 

protection of life or property. 

(2) Except for participants and vessels 

already at berth, a person or vessel 

within the regulated area at the start of 

enforcement of this section must 

immediately depart the regulated area. 

(3) A spectator must contact the Event 

PATCOM to request permission to 

either enter or pass through the 

regulated area. The Event PATCOM, and 

official patrol vessels enforcing this 

regulated area, can be contacted on 

marine band radio VHF–FM channel 16 

(156.8 MHz) and channel 22A (157.1 

MHz). If permission is granted, the 

spectator must enter the designated 

spectator area or pass directly through 

the regulated area as instructed by Event 

PATCOM. A vessel within the regulated 

area must operate at safe speed that 

minimizes wake. A spectator vessel 

must not loiter within the navigable 

channel while within the regulated area. 

(4) Only participant vessels and 

official patrol vessels are allowed to 

enter and remain within the race area. 

(5) Only participant vessels and 

official patrol vessels are allowed to 

enter and transit directly through the 

buffer area, in order to arrive at or 

depart from the race area. 

(6) A person or vessel that desires to 

transit, moor, or anchor within the 

regulated area must obtain authorization 

from the COTP Maryland-National 

Capital Region or Event PATCOM. A 

person or vessel seeking such 

permission can contact the COTP 

Maryland-National Capital Region at 

telephone number 410–576–2693 or on 

Marine Band Radio, VHF–FM channel 

16 (156.8 MHz) or the Event PATCOM 

on Marine Band Radio, VHF–FM 

channel 16 (156.8 MHz). 

(7) The Coast Guard will publish a 

notice in the Fifth Coast Guard District 

Local Notice to Mariners and issue a 

marine information broadcast on VHF– 

FM marine band radio announcing 

specific event dates and times. 

(d) Enforcement officials. The Coast 

Guard may be assisted with marine 

event patrol and enforcement of the 

regulated area by other Federal, state, 

and local agencies. 

(e) Enforcement period. This section 

will be enforced from 7:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

on June 4, 2022, and from 7:30 a.m. to 

5 p.m. on June 5, 2022. 

Dated: March 30, 2022. 

David E. O’Connell, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Maryland-National Capital Region. 

[FR Doc. 2022–07404 Filed 4–6–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R07–OAR–2022–0329; FRL–9699–01– 

R7] 

Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Start-Up, 

Shutdown, and Malfunction Conditions 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve 

revisions to the Missouri State 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
20368 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 67 / Thursday, April 7, 2022 / Proposed Rules 

1State Implementation Plans: Response to 

Petition for Rulemaking; Findings of Substantial 

Inadequacy; and SIP Calls To Amend Provisions 

Applying to Excess Emissions During Periods of 

Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction, 78 FR 12460 

(Feb. 22, 2013). 

2Petition to Find Inadequate and Correct Several 

State Implementation Plans under section 110 of 

the Clean Air Act Due to Startup, Shutdown, 

Malfunction, and/or Maintenance Provisions (June 

30, 2011). 

Implementation Plan (SIP) received on 

February 11, 2020. In the submission, 

Missouri requests to revise a regulation 

related to reporting of start-up, 

shutdown, and malfunction (SSM) 

events. The revisions to this rule 

include adding incorporations by 

reference to other State rules, including 

definitions specific to the rule and 

making administrative wording changes. 

These revisions do not impact the 

stringency of the SIP or air quality. 

Approval of these revisions will ensure 

consistency between State and federally 

approved rules. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before May 9, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– 

OAR–2022–0329 to https://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Instructions: All submissions received 

must include the Docket ID No. for this 

rulemaking. Comments received will be 

posted without change to https://

www.regulations.gov/, including any 

personal information provided. For 

detailed instructions on sending 

comments and additional information 

on the rulemaking process, see the 

‘‘Written Comments’’ heading of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of 

this document. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Allie Donohue, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 7 Office, Air 

Quality Planning Branch, 11201 Renner 

Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; 

telephone number: (913) 551–7986; 

email address: donohue.allie@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. Written Comments 

II. What is being addressed in this document? 

III. Background 

IV. Have the requirements for approval of a 

SIP revision been met? 

V. What action is the EPA taking? 

VI. Incorporation by Reference 

VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Written Comments 

Submit your comments, identified by 

Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2022– 

0329, at https://www.regulations.gov. 

Once submitted, comments cannot be 

edited or removed from Regulations.gov. 

The EPA may publish any comment 

received to its public docket. Do not 

submit electronically any information 

you consider to be Confidential 

Business Information (CBI) or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Multimedia 

submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 

accompanied by a written comment. 

The written comment is considered the 

official comment and should include 

discussion of all points you wish to 

make. The EPA will generally not 

consider comments or comment 

contents located outside of the primary 

submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or 

other file sharing system). For 

additional submission methods, the full 

EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia 

submissions, and general guidance on 

making effective comments, please visit 

https://www.epa.gov/dockets/ 

commenting-epa-dockets. 

II. What is being addressed in this 

document? 

The EPA is proposing to approve 

Missouri’s revisions to 10 Code of State 

Regulation (CSR) 10–6.050, Start-Up, 

Shutdown, and Malfunction Conditions, 

which relate to reporting of SSM events 

in the Missouri SIP. These provisions in 

the SIP require the reporting of SSM 

events to the Missouri Department of 

Natural Resources (MoDNR). 

Specifically, the provisions set the time 

by which such notification must occur, 

define what constitutes an SSM event, 

and establish the required contents of 

the written report including but not 

limited to measures taken to mitigate 

the extent and duration of the excess 

emissions, measures taken to remedy 

the situation which caused the excess 

emissions and the measures taken or 

planned to prevent the recurrence of 

these situations. 

The EPA received the MoDNR’s SIP 

revision submission on February 11, 

2020. The EPA’s full analysis of the 

revisions can be found in the technical 

support document (TSD) included in 

this docket. 

In 10 CSR 10–6.050 Section (2) 

Definitions, the State incorporated 

definitions for ‘‘excess emissions’’ into 

subsection (A), ‘‘malfunction’’ into 

subsection (B), ‘‘shutdown’’ into 

subsection (C), and start-up into 

subsection (D). The definitions in the 

revision are the same as the definitions 

in the SIP approved 10 CSR 10–6.020. 

The revisions to Section (2) Definitions 

also move language about definitions 

not included in 10 CSR 10–6.050 into 

subsection (E). Because the language 

was already SIP-approved, and because 

the definitions relate to requirements 

related to informational reporting on 

SSM events, EPA finds that these 

revisions do not affect the stringency of 

the SIP. The rule revisions also include 

minor word changes, which are 

administrative in nature and do not 

affect the stringency of the SIP. 

EPA finds that approving these 

revisions into the Missouri SIP is 

consistent with EPA’s policy as further 

described in Section III. 

III. Background 

On February 22, 2013, the EPA issued 

a Federal Register notice of proposed 

rulemaking outlining EPA’s policy at 

the time with respect to SIP provisions 

related to periods of SSM. EPA analyzed 

specific SSM SIP provisions and 

explained how each one either did or 

did not comply with the Clean Air Act 

(CAA) with regard to excess emission 

events.1 EPA finalized this proposed 

action on June 12, 2015, in ‘‘State 

Implementation Plans: Response to 

Petition for Rulemaking; Restatement 

and Update of EPA’s SSM Policy 

Applicable to SIPs; Findings of 

Substantial Inadequacy; and SIP Calls 

To Amend Provisions Applying to 

Excess Emissions During Periods of 

Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction’’ 

(80 FR 33839, June 12, 2015), hereafter 

referred to as the ‘‘2015 SSM SIP 

Action.’’ 

As described in section IX.H.3 of the 

February 2013 proposal, EPA reviewed 

the Missouri rule at issue in this action 

because it was included in a Sierra Club 

petition.2 Sierra Club argued that this 

Missouri provision gave State personnel 

authority to determine where 

enforcement action should be taken 

based on information a source submits 

about excess emissions resulting from a 

malfunction, start-up, or shutdown. EPA 

denied the petition on this provision 

and affirmatively found the provision to 

be consistent with the 2015 policy ‘‘on 

the basis that the provision is on its face 

clearly applicable only to Missouri state 

enforcement personnel and that the 

provision thus could not reasonably be 

read by a court to foreclose enforcement 

by the EPA or through a citizen suit 

where Missouri state personnel elect to 

exercise enforcement discretion.’’ As a 

result, Missouri rule, 10 Code of State 

Regulation (CSR) 10–6.050, Start-Up, 

Shutdown, and Malfunction Conditions, 

was not included in the 2015 SSM SIP 

Call. Because the Missouri submittal 

does not substantively alter this rule, 

EPA’s previous conclusions relating to 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 67 / Thursday, April 7, 2022 / Proposed Rules 20369 

this provision’s compliance with EPA’s 

SSM policy remain unchanged. 

IV. Have the requirements for approval 

of a SIP revision been met? 

The State submission has met the 

public notice requirements for SIP 

submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 

51.102. The submission also satisfied 

the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 

51, appendix V. The State provided 

public notice on this SIP revision from 

June 3, 2019 to July 3, 2019 and 

received 6 comments. Five comments 

were from industry groups and one 

comment was from EPA. The industry 

comments all related to reporting excess 

emissions as soon as possible. 

Ultimately, the State opted not to 

include additional language to this 

effect and maintained that notification 

must occur within two days. The EPA 

comment letter indicated that EPA did 

not have comments on the rule changes. 

Therefore, the State adequately 

addressed each comment. In addition, 

as explained above, the revision meets 

the substantive SIP requirements of the 

CAA, including section 110 and 

implementing regulations. 

V. What action is the EPA proposing? 

The EPA is proposing to approve 

Missouri’s revisions to 10 CSR 10– 

6.050, Start-Up, Shutdown, and 

Malfunction Conditions, which relate to 

reporting of SSM events in the Missouri 

SIP as submitted to EPA on February 11, 

2020. We are soliciting comments on 

this proposed action. Because this rule 

was previously approved into 

Missouri’s SIP, we are soliciting 

comments solely on the proposed 

revisions to the rule and not on the 

existing text that is approved into 

Missouri’s SIP. Final rulemaking will 

occur after consideration of any 

comments. 

VI. Incorporation by Reference 

In this document, the EPA is 

proposing to include regulatory text in 

an EPA final rule that includes 

incorporation by reference. In 

accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 

51.5, the EPA is proposing to 

incorporate by reference the Missouri 

Regulations described in Section II of 

this preamble and set forth in the 

proposed amendments to 40 CFR part 

52 below. The EPA has made, and will 

continue to make, these materials 

generally available through 

www.regulations.gov and at the EPA 

Region 7 Office (please contact the 

person identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section of this 

preamble for more information). 

VII. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Act and applicable 

Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 

40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP 

submissions, the EPA’s role is to 

approve state choices, provided that 

they meet the criteria of the CAA. 

Accordingly, this action merely 

approves state law as meeting Federal 

requirements and does not impose 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by state law. For that reason, 

this action: 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to review by the Office of 

Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of the 

National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act (NTTA) because this 

rulemaking does not involve technical 

standards; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

The SIP is not approved to apply on 

any Indian reservation land or in any 

other area where EPA or an Indian tribe 

has demonstrated that a tribe has 

jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian 

country, the rule does not have tribal 

implications and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Lead, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate 

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: March 31, 2022. 

Meghan A. McCollister, 

Regional Administrator, Region 7. 

For the reasons stated in the 

preamble, the EPA proposes to amend 

40 CFR part 52 as set forth below: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart AA—Missouri 

■ 2. In § 52.1320, the table in paragraph 

(c) is amended by revising the entry 

‘‘10–6.050’’ to read as follows: 

§ 52.870 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
20370 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 67 / Thursday, April 7, 2022 / Proposed Rules 

EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS

Missouri citation Title State effective 

date EPA approval date Explanation 

Missouri Department of Natural Resources 

*******

Chapter 6—Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the State of 

Missouri 

*******

10–6.050 .................................... Start-Up, Shutdown, and Malfunction Conditions.1/30/2020 [Date of publication of the final 

rule in the Federal Register], 

[Federal Register citation of 

the final rule].

*******

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2022–07292 Filed 4–6–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2021–0411; FRL–9547–01– 

R5] 

Air Plan Approval; Minnesota; Bulk 

Silos FESOP Update 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a 

site-specific revision to the Minnesota 

State Implementation Plan (SIP) for 

particulate matter less than 10 microns 

(PM10) for the portland cement 

distribution terminal owned and 

operated by Bulk Silos, LLC (Bulk 

Silos), formerly known as Lafarge North 

America Corporation on Childs Road 

Terminal (Lafarge-Childs Road 

Terminal) located in Saint Paul, Ramsey 

County, Minnesota. In its June 16, 2021, 

submittal, the Minnesota Pollution 

Control Agency (MPCA) requested that 

EPA approve certain conditions 

contained in Bulk Silos’ federally 

enforceable state operating permit 

(FESOP) into the Minnesota PM SIP. 

The request is approvable because it 

satisfies the requirements of the Clean 

Air Act (CAA). MPCA’s submission 

included an updated modeling 

demonstration to show the construction 

changes incorporated in the Title I SIP 

Conditions will not interfere with the 

ability to maintain the National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards 

(NAAQS), as Bulk Silos’ allowable PM10

emissions limits will be decreased with 

this action. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before May 9, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– 

OAR–2021–0411 at http://

www.regulations.gov, or via email to 

arra.sarah@epa.gov. For comments 

submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the 

online instructions for submitting 

comments. Once submitted, comments 

cannot be edited or removed from 

Regulations.gov. For either manner of 

submission, EPA may publish any 

comment received to its public docket. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Multimedia 

submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 

accompanied by a written comment. 

The written comment is considered the 

official comment and should include 

discussion of all points you wish to 

make. EPA will generally not consider 

comments or comment contents located 

outside of the primary submission (i.e., 

on the web, cloud, or other file sharing 

system). For additional submission 

methods, please contact the person 

identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the 

full EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia 

submissions, and general guidance on 

making effective comments, please visit 

http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ 

commenting-epa-dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Olivia Davidson, Physical Scientist, 

Attainment Planning and Maintenance 

Section, Air Programs Branch (AR18J), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–0266, 

davidson.olivia@epa.gov. The EPA 

Region 5 office is open from 8:30 a.m. 

to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

excluding Federal holidays and facility 

closures due to COVID–19. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

Final Rules section of this Federal 

Register, EPA is approving the State’s 

SIP submittal as a direct final rule 

without prior proposal because the 

Agency views this as a noncontroversial 

submittal and anticipates no adverse 

comments. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the direct final 

rule. If no relevant adverse comments 

are received in response to this rule, no 

further activity is contemplated. If EPA 

receives such comments, the direct final 

rule will be withdrawn and all public 

comments received will be addressed in 

a subsequent final rule based on this 

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a 

second comment period. Any parties 

interested in commenting on this action 

should do so at this time. Please note 

that if EPA receives adverse comment 

on an amendment, paragraph, or section 

of this rule and if that provision may be 

severed from the remainder of the rule, 

EPA may adopt as final those provisions 

of the rule that are not the subject of an 

adverse comment. For additional 

information, see the direct final rule 

which is located in the Rules section of 

this Federal Register. 

Dated: March 31, 2022. 

Debra Shore, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

[FR Doc. 2022–07287 Filed 4–6–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD 

49 CFR Chapter X 

[Docket No. EP 768] 

Petition for Rulemaking To Adopt 

Rules Governing Private Railcar Use 

by Railroads 

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS