14906 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2022 / Notices 

Comments that you submit in 

response to this notice are a matter of 

public record. Before including your 

address, phone number, email address, 

or other personal identifying 

information in your comment, you 

should be aware that your entire 

comment—including your personal 

identifying information—may be made 

publicly available at any time. While 

you can ask us in your comment to 

withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Abstract: Submission of this 

information allows the Office of Indian 

Economic Development (OIED) to 

implement the Loan Guarantee, 

Insurance, and Interest Subsidy 

Program, 25 U.S.C. 1451 et seq., the 

purpose of which is to encourage 

private lending to individual Indians 

and Indian organizations by providing 

lenders with loan guarantees or loan 

insurance to reduce their potential risk. 

The information collection allows OIED 

to determine the eligibility and creditworthiness of respondents and loans 

and otherwise ensure compliance with 

Program requirements. This information 

collection includes the use of several 

forms. 

Title of Collection: Loan Guarantee, 

Insurance, and Interest Subsidy 

Program. 

OMB Control Number: 1076–0020. 

Form Number: LGA10, LIA10, RGI10, 

ISR10, NOD10, CFL10, ALD10, NIL10, 

and LGC10. 

Type of Review: Revision of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents/Affected Public: 

Lenders, including commercial banks, 

and borrowers, including individual 

Indians and Indian organizations. 

Total Estimated Number of Annual 

Respondents: 622. 

Total Estimated Number of Annual 

Responses: 1,377. 

Estimated Completion Time per 

Response: Ranging from 0.5 to 2 hours. 

Total Estimated Number of Annual 

Burden Hours: 2,654 hours. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Required to 

Obtain or Retain a Benefit. 

Frequency of Collection: On occasion. 

Total Estimated Annual Nonhour 

Burden Cost: $0. 

An agency may not conduct or 

sponsor and a person is not required to 

respond to a collection of information 

unless it displays a currently valid OMB 

control number. 

The authority for this action is the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). 

Steven Mullen, 

Information Collection Clearance Officer, 

Office of Regulatory Affairs and Collaborative 

Action—Indian Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 2022–05566 Filed 3–15–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4337–15–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1228] 

Certain Automated Storage and 

Retrieval Systems, Robots, and 

Components Thereof; Notice of a 

Commission Determination To Review 

in Part a Final Initial Determination and 

Order No. 33; and, on Review, To Find 

No Violation of Section 337 

Termination of the Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined to review 

in part the presiding administrative law 

judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) final initial 

determination (‘‘ID’’) issued on 

December 13, 2021, finding no violation 

of section 337, and Order No. 33 

(‘‘Markman Order’’), issued on July 22, 

2021, in the above-referenced 

investigation. On review, the 

Commission has determined to find no 

violation of section 337. The 

investigation is terminated in its 

entirety. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Cathy Chen, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202– 

205–2392. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on November 6, 2020, based on a 

complaint filed on behalf of AutoStore 

Technology AS of Norway; AutoStore 

AS of Norway; and AutoStore System 

Inc. of Derry, New Hampshire 

(collectively, ‘‘Complainants’’). 85 FR 

71096 (Nov. 6, 2020). The complaint, as 

supplemented, alleged violations of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain automated storage and retrieval 

systems, robots, and components thereof 

by reason of infringement of claims 1– 

6 of U.S. Patent No. 10,093,525 (‘‘the 

’525 patent’’); claims 1 and 18–20 of 

U.S. Patent No. 10,294,025 (‘‘the ’025 

patent’’); claims 1–4 and 11–15 of U.S. 

Patent No. 10,474,140 (‘‘the ’140 

patent’’); claims 1, 2, and 5–15 of U.S. 

Patent No. 10,494,239 (‘‘the ’239 

patent’’); and claim 19 of U.S. Patent 

No. 10,696,478 (‘‘the ’478 patent’’). Id. 

The complaint further alleged that a 

domestic industry exists. Id. The 

Commission’s notice of investigation 

named eight respondents: Ocado Group 

Plc; Ocado Central Services Ltd.; Ocado 

Innovation Ltd.; Ocado Operating Ltd.; 

Ocado Solutions, Ltd.; Tharsus Group 

Ltd.; and Printed Motor Works Ltd., all 

of the United Kingdom; and Ocado 

Solutions USA Inc. of Tysons Corner, 

Virginia (collectively, ‘‘Respondents’’). 

Id. at 71097. The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations did not participate as a 

party in this investigation. Id. 

Respondent Printed Motor Works Ltd. 

was terminated from the investigation 

based on withdrawal of allegations in 

the complaint. See Order No. 19, at 1 

(June 2, 2021), unreviewed by Comm’n 

Notice (June 22, 2021). 

The asserted claims of the ’140 patent 

and claims 1 and 18 of the ’025 patent 

were terminated from the investigation. 

See Order No. 59 (August 9, 2021), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Aug. 20, 

2021). Complainants’ allegations that 

Respondents’ 500 series robot and 

redesigned 500 series robot infringe 

claims 19 and 20 of the ’025 patent were 

also terminated from the investigation. 

Id. 

The Markman Order, issued on July 

22, 2021, construed claim terms from all 

five asserted patents. See Order No. 33 

(July 22, 2021). The Markman Order 

found claims 2 and 3 of the ’525 patent 

and claims 5, 6, 14, and 15 of the ’239 

patent to be indefinite. Id. at 35–39. 

An evidentiary hearing was held on 

August 2–6, 2021. 

On December 13, 2021, the ALJ issued 

the final ID finding no violation of 

section 337 and his recommended 

determination (‘‘RD’’). Specifically, the 

ID found the accused products infringe 

claims 1 and 6 of the ’525 patent; claims 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2022 / Notices 14907 

1Chair Kearns would affirm the ID’s finding that 

the economic prong was not established with 

respect to AutoStore USA’s investments. 

1, 2, and 7–13 of the ’239 patent; and 

claim 19 of the ’478 patent; but those 

claims are invalid for failure to comply 

with the written description 

requirement and the enablement 

requirement of 35 U.S.C. 112, para. 1. 

The ID also found claims 4 and 5 of the 

’525 patent invalid as indefinite under 

35 U.S.C. 112, para. 2, because they 

depend from claims 2 and 3 of the ’525 

patent, which the ALJ found indefinite 

in the Markman Order. As for the ’025 

patent, the ID found the accused 

products do not infringe claims 19 and 

20 and the claims have not been shown 

to be invalid. The ID further found that 

Complainants have shown that the 

domestic industry requirement has been 

satisfied with respect to the asserted 

patents under section 337(a)(3)(B). 

The parties filed a joint motion to 

extend the time for them to file petitions 

for review from December 27, 2021 

(with responses due January 4, 2022) to 

December 30, 2021 (with responses due 

January 10, 2022). On December 14, 

2021, the Chair granted the motion. 

On December 30, 2021, Complainants 

and Respondents filed separate petitions 

for review of the ID. On January 10, 

2022, they filed separate replies to the 

petitions for review. 

The Commission solicited 

submissions from the public on public 

interest issues raised by the 

recommended determination. On 

January 14, 2022, the Kroger Co. 

submitted comments on the public 

interest for the Commission to consider 

should the Commission find a violation. 

Having reviewed the record of the 

investigation, including the final ID, the 

Markman Order, and the parties’ 

submissions, the Commission has 

determined to review in part the final ID 

and the Markman Order. Specifically, 

the Commission has determined to 

review: (1) The ALJ’s construction of the 

terms ‘‘vehicle body’’ and ‘‘a plurality of 

[rolling members/wheels] attached to 

the vehicle body’’ in the asserted claims 

of the ’525, ’239, and ’478 patents; (2) 

the ID’s finding that claims 2–5 of the 

’525 patent and claims 5, 6, 14, and 15 

of the ’239 patent are invalid as 

indefinite; (3) the ID’s construction of 

the term ‘‘a displacement motor’’ in 

claim 1 of the ’025 patent; and (4) the 

ID’s findings that the economic prong of 

the domestic industry is satisfied. 

Among other findings, the Commission 

has determined not to review the ID’s 

finding that the asserted claims of the 

’525, ’239, and ’478 patents are invalid 

for failing to comply with the written 

description and enablement 

requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112, para. 1. 

On review, the Commission affirms 

with modification the ALJ’s 

construction of the terms ‘‘vehicle 

body’’ and ‘‘a plurality of [rolling 

members/wheels] attached to the 

vehicle body’’ in the claims of the ’525, 

’239, and ’478 patents. The Commission 

also affirms the ALJ’s finding of 

indefiniteness with respect to certain 

claims of the ’525 and ’239 patents and 

the ID’s construction of the term ‘‘a 

displacement motor’’ in claim 1 of the 

’025 patent with the additional analyses 

provided in its opinion. Having adopted 

the ID’s findings that the asserted claims 

of the ’525, ’239, and ’478 patents are 

invalid and the asserted claims of the 

’025 patent are not infringed, the 

Commission has determined to take no 

position on the economic prong of the 

domestic industry requirement.1

Accordingly, the Commission has 

determined to affirm with modifications 

the ID’s finding of no violation of 

section 337. The investigation is 

terminated in its entirety. The 

Commission’s reasoning in support of 

its determination is set forth more fully 

in its opinion. 

The Commission vote for this 

determination took place on March 10, 

2022. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in Part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR part 

210. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: March 10, 2022. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2022–05504 Filed 3–15–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Federal Bureau of Investigation 

Meeting of the Compact Council for the 

National Crime Prevention and Privacy 

Compact 

AGENCY: Federal Bureau of 

Investigation, Department of Justice. 

ACTION: Meeting notice. 

SUMMARY: The purpose of this notice is 

to announce a meeting of the National 

Crime Prevention and Privacy Compact 

Council (Council) created by the 

National Crime Prevention and Privacy 

Compact Act of 1998 (Compact). 

DATES: The Council will meet in open 

session from 8:30 a.m. (EDT) until 5:00 

p.m. (EDT) on May 12, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place 

at the Florida Hotel and Conference 

Center, 1500 Sand Lake Road, Orlando, 

Florida, 32809. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Inquiries may be addressed to Mrs. 

Chasity S. Anderson, FBI Compact 

Officer, Biometric Technology Center, 

1000 Custer Hollow Road, Clarksburg, 

West Virginia 26306, telephone 304– 

625–2803. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Thus far, 

the Federal Government and 34 states 

are parties to the Compact which 

governs the exchange of criminal history 

records for licensing, employment, 

immigration and naturalization matters, 

and similar purposes. The Compact also 

provides a legal framework for the 

establishment of a cooperative federalstate system to exchange such records. 

The United States Attorney General 

appoints 15 persons from state and 

federal agencies to serve on the Council. 

The Council will prescribe system rules 

and procedures for the effective and 

proper operation of the Interstate 

Identification Index system for 

noncriminal justice purposes. 

Matters for discussion are expected to 

include: 

(1) Proposed Changes to the Compact 

Council’s Frequently Asked Questions 

Guide 

(2) Modernization of the CJIS Security 

Policy 

(3) Review of the National Fingerprint 

File Program Participation 

Implementation Plans 

The meeting will be conducted with 

a blended participation option. The 

meeting will be open to the public on 

a first-come, first-serve basis with 

limited seating due to COVID–19 safety 

protocols. Virtual options are available. 

Individuals must provide their name, 

city, state, phone, and email address to 

register. Information regarding virtual 

access will be provided prior to the 

meeting to all registered individuals. 

Any member of the public wishing to 

file a written statement with the Council 

or wishing to address this session of the 

Council should notify the FBI Compact 

Officer, Mrs. Chasity S. Anderson at 

compactoffice@fbi.gov, at least 7 days 

prior to the start of the session. The 

notification should contain the 

individual’s name and corporate 

designation, consumer affiliation, or 

government designation, along with a 

short statement describing the topic to 

be addressed and the time needed for 

the presentation. Individuals will 

ordinarily be allowed up to 15 minutes 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1