alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.25

               LETTER TO PLAN PARTICIPANTS AS OF JANUARY 10, 2003


                                January 13, 2003

Dear Fellow Shareholder:

     Enclosed is a prospectus that describes Hibernia's Dividend Reinvestment
and Stock Purchase Plan as amended by the Board of Directors. The plan offers
you the opportunity to purchase shares of Class A Common Stock (no par value) of
Hibernia Corporation with automatically reinvested dividends and optional cash
payments, without payment of trading fees or service charges.

     The major change you will note is that, beginning in 2003, Hibernia no
longer offers the 5% discount that previously was given to shareholders who
reinvested their dividends in Hibernia Common Stock. If you are participating in
the plan and do not wish to continue reinvesting dividends, you must notify the
plan administrator. For such a change to be effective before Hibernia's next
possible dividend payment, the notification must be made promptly. Assuming the
Board declares a dividend payable in February 2003, in order to change your
participation in the plan before that dividend is paid, you must notify the plan
administrator before the record date for that dividend -- which could be in
early February.

     Shares of Hibernia stock purchased with automatically reinvested dividends
now will be purchased at the market value determined as provided in the plan.
Shares purchased with optional cash payments will continue to be purchased at
the market value determined under the plan. Dividends are normally reinvested on
the quarterly dividend payment dates (although, as always, payment of dividends
is in the discretion of the Board of Directors). You may participate in dividend
reinvestment with respect to all or any portion of your shares.

     If you are participating in dividend reinvestment, you may also purchase
shares under the plan with optional cash payments. These shares are generally
purchased once a month. You may make optional cash payments at any time. You may
invest a minimum of $100, and you may invest a maximum of $3,000 per month.

     If you currently participate in the plan and do not want to make any
changes, you do not have to take any action. However, you need to contact the
plan administrator if you wish to change the number of shares designated for
dividend reinvestment, if you no longer wish to participate in the plan or if
you have any questions about the plan. Section 6 of the prospectus explains how
to contact the plan administrator.

     Thank you for your continued support of Hibernia.

                                        Sincerely,

                                        /s/ J. Herbert Boydstun
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        J. Herbert Boydstun
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer

Enclosure
Order entered May 20, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 00568
- CV IN THE MATTER OF M.L ., A CHILD On Appeal from the 304th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. JD
- 71935
- W 

### O RDER
Bef ore the Court is appellant’s May 15, 2013 motion regarding sealed records. Appellant’s counsel, Dean Swanda, seeks to check out both the sealed clerk’s record and sealed reporter’s record. In the motion, appellant informs the Court that we did not allow Mr. Swanda’s assistant to check out the sealed records. This Court allows sealed records to be checked out only by the attorney of record. We GRANT appellant’s motion to allow the records to be checked out by Dean Swanda, appellant’s attorney of record.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
No. 10-947.

#### Bank Melli Iran New York Representative Office *v.*Weinstein et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Form 10-Q of Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Noven)
for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert C. Strauss, President,
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Noven, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:  1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Noven. /s/ Robert C. StraussName:
    Robert C. StraussTitle:
    President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Noven
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. § 1350)



Each of the undersigned
officers of Parkview Capital Credit, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, for purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter
63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:



| | (i) | The
accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2018 (the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: April 1, 2019 | By:    | /s/ Keith W. Smith                          
|------------------- | ------ | --------------------------------------------
|                    | Name:  | Keith W. Smith                              
|                    | Title: | Chief Executive Officer                     
|                    |        | (Principal Executive Officer)               
|                    |        |                                             
|Date: April 1,
2019 | By:    | /s/ Charles Jacobson                        
|                    | Name:  | Charles Jacobson                            
|                    | Title: | Chief Financial Officer                     
|                    |        | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



The foregoing certification
is being furnished with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into
any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general information language in such
filing, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates by reference.



A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 11-9803.

#### Moore v. Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1

             CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRESIDENT

                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Harold Blomquist, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Simtek Corporation on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Simtek Corporation.



/s/Harold Blomquist
-------------------------------------
Harold Blomquist
Chief Executive Officer and President

December 11, 2006
----

|   | (1)    | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                    |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                    |
|   | (2)    | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,      the financial condition and results of operations of the      Partnership. |

|   | /s/  James D.    Weddle            |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   | Chief      Executive Officer                 |
|   | The      Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. |
|   | November      7, 2008                        |
#### Susan Lorraine DONALDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Intervenor/Defendant-Appellee, and M&T Bank, Defendant.

No. 15-1781

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 20, 2017

Decided: February 5, 2018

John Douglas Burns, THE BURNS LAWFIRM, LLC, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant. Kyle James Moulding, Steven Cammarata, MCCABE, WEISBERG, AND CONWAY, LLC, Laurel, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Susan Lorraine Donaldson filed a Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition in April 2014. She filed the underlying adversary proceeding seeking a declaration that would allow her to bifurcate the mortgage on her primary residence into a secured claim up to the appraised value and an unsecured claim on the remaining balance (i.e., a “cram-down”). Donaldson argued that, because the deed of trust provides for supplemental collateral in the form of escrow funds, insurance proceeds, and miscellaneous proceeds, these interests are not “real property” within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. § 1322(b)(2) (2012). The bankruptcy court disagreed and granted Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC’s motion to dismiss. The district court affirmed the bankruptcy court’s order and Donaldson appealed to this court.

In light of our decision in *Birmingham v. PNC Bank, N.A.,*846 F.3d 88 (4th Cir. 2017), *cert.*denied, — U.S. —, 138 S.Ct. 468, 199 L.Ed.2d 375 (2017), we affirm the district court’s order. In *Birmingham,*we held that the assignment to the lender in the deed of trust of “[e]scrow funds, insurance proceeds, and miscellaneous proceeds [does] not constitute additional collateral,” within the meaning of § 1322(b)(2). *Id.*at 99. Based on our reasoning in *Birmingham,*we affirm the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing Donaldson’s complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
SERVED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 -^ARTMENTOF 

^'^NSPORWION 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPOK1A UUIN 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

: KET OPERATIONS 

^iO nri -1 A ^ 32 

IN THE MATTER OF 

SCENIC AVIATION, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP09NM0011 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2009 - 0974 

HEARING NOTICE 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered 

on December 13,14 and 15, 2010, at the U.S. Tax Court, Courtroom 5223, Wallace 

F. Bennett Federal Building, 125 S. State Street, Salt Lake City, UT 84138. Hearings 

w^ill commence at 9:00 a.m. and conclude at 4:30 p.m. each day. The parties should 

vacate the courthouse on or before 5:00 p.m. each day. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment(s) - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP09NM011 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL i& ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Gregory S. Winton, Respondent's Counsel 

Aviation Law Experts, LLC 

330 Aviation Way, Second Floor 

Frederick, MD 21701 

TEL: 301-294-8550 

FAX: 301-294-2525 

Scott R. Morris, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Feder^ Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, WA 98057 

TEL: 425-227-2007 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Groimd Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

* Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building -

Room 2014, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
# ORIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 23-0154 AGNES ADVENTURES, LLC,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JORDI ANZIK,

Defendant and Appellant. 

# FILED MAR 1 4 2023 Bowen Greenwoory Clerk of Supreme Court StatR of h/lontana ORDER
Appellant Jordi Anzik has filed a notice ofappeal from theFebruary 9, 2023 Order on Appeal from Justice Court ofthe First Judicial District Court, Cause No. ADV-2022-1071, that the District Court has certified as final pursuant to M. R. Civ. P. 54(b). Pursuant to M. R. App. P.4(4)(b), we have reviewed the District Court's certification order for compliance with M. R.App. P. 6(6). We conclude the court's certification order is in substantial compliance with the requirements ofRule 6(6) and our case law interpreting certification orders under Rule 54(b). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this appeal may proceed. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis Order to all counsel ofrecord. DATED this 1"--t ay ofMarch, 2023.
ChiefJustice • 03/14/2023

Case Number: DA 23-015494( A l to g AIL Justices

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                  JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                              742,552   
<SECURITIES>                                              0   
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2,608,736   
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0   
<INVENTORY>                                         470,065   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  4,551,331   
<PP&E>                                            3,586,941   
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   10,916,455   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2,195,186   
<BONDS>                                                   0   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0   
<PREFERRED>                                               0   
<COMMON>                                                915   
<OTHER-SE>                                        8,161,373   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     10,916,455   
<SALES>                                          12,391,205   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 12,391,205   
<CGS>                                             8,479,515   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    12,977,073   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (368,944)  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   50,699   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (166,225)  
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (166,225)  
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0   
<CHANGES>                                                 0   
<NET-INCOME>                                       (166,225)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (.02)  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.02)  
                                               



</TABLE>
#### COM. v. BRODERICK, P.

994 EDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/21/2017

CP-23-CR-0003888-2007 (Delaware)

Affirmed
#### Angela D. GOSNELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-1509

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 31, 2018

Decided: February 8, 2018

Dana W. Duncan, DUNCAN DISABILITY LAW, S.C., Nekoosa, Wisconsin, for Appellant. Nora Koch, Regional Chief Counsel, Brian O’Donnell, Deputy Regional Chief Counsel, Quinn Niblack Doggett, Special Assistant United States Attorney, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Ap-pellee.

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Angela D. Gosnell appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and upholding the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) denial of Gosnell’s application for supplemental security income. “In social security proceedings, a court of appeals applies the same standard of review as does the district court. That is, a reviewing court must uphold the determination when an ALJ has applied correct legal standards and the ALJ’s factual findings are supported by substantial evidence.” *Brown v. Comm’r Soc. Sec. Admin.,*873 F.3d 251, 267 (4th Cir. 2017) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). “Substantial evidence is *217that which a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion. It consists of more than a mere scintilla of evidence but may be less than a preponderance.” *Pearson v. Colvin,*810 F.3d 204, 207 (4th Cir. 2015) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). “In reviewing for substantial evidence, we do not undertake to reweigh conflicting evidence, make credibility determinations, or substitute our judgment for that of the ALJ. Where conflicting evidence allows reasonable minds to differ as to whether a claimant is disabled, the responsibility for that decision falls on the ALJ.” *Hancock v. Astrue,*667 F.3d 470, 472 (4th Cir. 2012) (brackets, citation, and internal quotation marks omitted).

We have reviewed the record and perceive no reversible error. The ALJ applied the correct legal standards in evaluating Gosnell’s claim for benefits, and the ALJ’s factual findings are supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment upholding the denial of benefits. *See Gosnell v. Berryhill,*No. 9:15-cv-04271-TMC, 2017 WL 710543 (D.S.C. Feb. 23, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT 21- SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                                                     Percentage of
Owned by Registrant                                Voting Securities
-------------------                                ----------------- 

Mischer Enterprises, Inc. (Texas)                        100%

City Pavers, Inc. d/b/a
 Mischer Paving & Utility Company,
 in the State of Texas (Delaware)                        100%

Lajitas Utility Co., Inc. (Texas)                        100%



The subsidiaries listed above are included in the Company's consolidated
financial statements.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C26

 Per the Pooling andServicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"),the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Exhibit 10.62 Schedule of Director Compensation


EXHIBIT 10.62




QUANTUM FUEL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGIES WORLDWIDE, INC
NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Each non-employee director receives the following compensation:  
Stock Awards:
1.Initial stock option grant for 2,500 shares on the date of such person’s appointment to the board of directors.
2.Annual stock option grant for 2,500 shares.
3. Annual restricted stock award of 1,000 shares. 
4.Nominating & Governance Committee has the discretion from time to time to recommend to the full board that the non-employee directors receive additional stock options and/or restricted stock awards.
Cash Compensation:
Annual Fees:
•All non-employee directors receive an annual retainer of $21,000.
•Audit Committee chair receives an annual fee of $14,000.
•Compensation Committee chair receives an annual fee of $7,000.
•Nominating and Governance Committee chair receives an annual fee of $3,500.
•Board Chair receives an annual fee of $25,000.
Meeting Fees:
•Non-employee directors receive a meeting fee of $1,500 for each regularly scheduled quarterly board meeting attended.
•Non-employee directors receive a meeting fee ranging from $700 to $1,500 (depending on length of meeting) for each special meeting attended.
•Committee members receive a meeting fee of $700 for each committee meeting attended.  If a director serves on multiple committees and attends more than one meeting on the same day, then the director receives a single meeting fee.  Also, if a committee meeting is held on the same day as a board meeting, then no committee meeting fee is paid.
Payment of Annual Fees, Meeting Fees and Grant of Annual Stock Awards:
Annual Fees are paid in four equal installments and are paid together with the Meeting Fees earned during the most recent quarter within a few weeks following the end of such quarter.  The grant date for the 2,500 stock options and 1,000 shares of restricted stock granted will be the date of that year’s annual meeting of stockholders.
Expenses:
Directors are also reimbursed their travel expenses incurred in connection with attending a meeting.