alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) Prudential | Prudential Asset Resources, Inc.

 

Prudential Mortgage Capital Company

2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 2500 Dallas, TX 75201 

Tel 877‐937‐4500

  |
|-------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association

Attn: Commercial Mtg Servicing

MAC D1086‐120

550 South Tryon Street, 14th Floor

Charlotte, NC 28202

 

 

RE: **WFCM 2014****‐****LC18**

Period: **January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”)**

 

Annual Compliance Statement

 

I, Timothy E. Steward, in my capacity as President and Managing Director of Prudential Asset Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certify with regard to the Company’s role as Primary Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, (the “Agreement”) dated as of December 1, 2014 pertaining to the above‐referenced certificates, that:

 

(i) a review of the activities of the Company under the Agreement during the period noted above, and of the performance of the Company under the Agreement during the reporting period has been made under my supervision, and

 

(ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout the reporting period.

 

Effective as of February 24, 2016

 

 

/s/ Timothy E. Steward

Timothy E. Steward

President and Managing Director

Prudential Asset Resources, Inc.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Funaki FALAHOLA, also known as Noc, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-11697 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed January 30, 2018

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Funaki Falahola, Pro Se

Before JOLLY, JONES, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Fu-naki Falahola has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Falahola has filed a response. To the extent he makes a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to fairly evaluate it; we therefore decline to consider any such claim without prejudice to collateral review. *See United States v.*Is*gar,*739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Falahola’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cm. R. 42.2. We further DENY AS MOOT Falahola’s pro se motions to substitute and DENY AS MOOT his motion for extraordinary relief.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
No. 11-1433.

#### Valdez *v.*Frank Kent Motor Co., dba Frank Kent Cadillac.

Sup. Ct. Tex. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           BD
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from the financial statements for The
Jones Financial Companies for the 6 months ended
June 26, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-26-1998
<CASH>                                          62,370
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,123,780
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                           13,805
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            229,664
<PP&E>                                         189,699
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,709,588
<SHORT-TERM>                                    25,000
<PAYABLES>                                     822,337
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                             48,344
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                              17,141
<LONG-TERM>                                    246,904
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     322,889
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,709,588
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                    0
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                            53,127
<COMMISSIONS>                                  554,168
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                   20,672
<FEE-REVENUE>                                   56,729
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,447
<COMPENSATION>                                 399,028
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                118,501
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     118,501
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   118,501
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 1791



### TAMARA ROUHI , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. KETTLER; HABITAT AMERICA LLC , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Stephanie A. Gallagher , District Judge. ( 1:19

- cv
- 03052

- SAG )

Submitted : December 17, 2020 Decided: December 21, 2020

Before THACKER, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Tamara Rouhi, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Lester Simmons, Jr. , WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, LLP , Baltimore, Maryland; Mark Anthony Kozlowski , LAW OFFICES OF JONATHAN P. STEBENNE , London, Kentucky ; Louis C. Long, Charles Benjamin Peoples, THOMAS, THOMAS & HAFER, LLP, Washington, D.C. , for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Tamara Rouhi appeals the district court’s o rder dismissing her complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rouhi v. Kettler , No.
1:19

- cv
- 03052

- SAG (D. Md. June 24, 2020) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con tentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Marcus FULBRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-11637 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 20, 2018

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Marcus Fulbright, Pro Se

Before REAVLEY, CLEMENT, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Marcus Fulbright has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Fulbright has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Ac*465cordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

 

The undersigned, Robert S. Herlin, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of Evolution Petroleum Corporation (the “Company”), certifiesin connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission ofthe Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2008 (the “Report”) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to hisknowledge, that:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed thiscertification as of the 14th day of May, 2008.

 
|        | /s/ ROBERT S. HERLIN                  |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Robert S. Herlin                      |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Evolution Petroleum Corporation andwill be retained by Evolution Petroleum Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certificate is being furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to this Form 10-Qand shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.

 

----
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report
of Till Capital Ltd. (“Till”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, John T. Rickard, Chief Executive Officer of Till, and Brian P. Lupien,
Chief Financial Officer of Till, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|By: | /s/ John T. Rickard     | 
|--- | ----------------------- | 
|    | John T. Rickard         | 
|    | Chief Executive Officer | 
|    | April 14, 2017          | 
|    |                         | 
|    |                         | 
|By: | /s/ Brian P. Lupien     | 
|    | Brian P. Lupien         | 
|    | Chief Financial Officer | 
|    | April 14, 2017          |
(logo)Newmark Knight Frank

 

 

225Franklin Street

18thFloor

Boston,MA 02110

T877.526.3562

ngkf.com

 

** **

**Officer’sCertificate**

 

 

Pursuant to the requirements of theapplicable Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule Ihereto, for which Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, NationalAssociation, as Master Servicer, and Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a NewmarkKnight Frank, as Primary Servicer, the undersigned, Ronald Steffenino, a SeniorManaging Director of Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a Newmark Knight Frank,hereby certifies subject to any limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as ofthe date hereof, solely in his capacity as an officer and not in his individualcapacity, as follows:

 

1. A review of the activities of thePrimary Servicer during the preceding calendar year (the "ReportingPeriod") and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under mysupervision; and

 

2.To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Primary Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 31stday of January, 2020.

 

 

BerkeleyPoint Capital LLC d/b/a

NewmarkKnight Frank

/s/Ronald Steffenino

RonaldSteffenino

SeniorManaging Director,

Servicingand Asset Management

 

 

**Schedule I**

 

CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates; Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a NewmarkKnight Frank as ***Primary Servicer***:

 

| COMM  2014-CCRE 17 | COMM  2014-CCRE19 |
|--------------------|-------------------|
| GSMS  2014-GC24    | COMM  2014-UBS4   |
| COMM  2015-CCRE23  | COMM  2015 CCRE27 |
| GSMS  2015-GC30    | COMM  2015-LC19   |
| COMM  2015-LC21    | CFCMT  2016-C3    |
| CGCMT  2016-C3     | CFCRE  2016-C7    |
| CCRESG  2016 HEAT  | CCUBS  2017-Cl    |
| CGCMT  2017-C4     | UBS  2017-C5      |
| BMARK  2018 B3     | MSCI  2018 L1     |
| UBS  2018 C12      | UBS  2018 C14     |
| UBS  2018 C8       | UBS  2018 C9      |
| MSCI  2018 H4      | MSCI  2019 L2     |

 

 

BPCd/b/a NKF Primary Servicer for Midland
#### COM. v. SOTO, A.

445 MDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

9/8/2017

CP-40-CR-0003997-2014, CP-40-CR-0004000-2014

(Luzerne)

Affirmed — Application to Withdraw Counsel Granted
Dismissed and Opinion Filed January 23 , 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 17 - 01263 - CV IN RE ARTURO SOLIS , Relator Original Proceeding from the 52nd District Court

Coryell County, Texas 1 Trial Court Cause No. C10 - 11 - 40751 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang, Brown, and Stoddart Opinion by Justice Stoddart Relator was declared a vexatious litigant on June 27, 2013 and is subject to a pre

- filing ord er prohibiting relator from filing “any new litigation in a court of this State without first obtaining permission from a local administrative judge pursuant to Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 11.102.” See T EX . C IV . P RAC . & R EM . C ODE A NN . § § 11.102(a)(1), 1 1.103(a) (West Supp. 2016). Before the Court is relator’s “Motion to Direct Trial Court to Institute Contempt of Court Proceedings Against District Clerk and to Appoint District Clerk Pro

- Tem to Cause” (“Contempt Motion”). By letter dated November 3, 20 17, we notified relator that the Court had reviewed the Contempt Motion, determined that it constitutes a new litigation, and docketed it as cause

1 P ursuant to Tex. Gov’t Code § 73.001 , the Supreme Court of Texas transferred all currently pending and future motions, writs of mandamus, and new proceedings arising from trial court cause number C10

- 11

- 40751 from the Court of Appeals for the Tenth District, Waco, Texas, to this Court. See T EX . S UP . C T . O RDER , Misc. Docket No. 17

– 91 34 ( Oc t. 2 4 , 2017).– 2

–

number 05

- 17

- 01263

- CV. We instructed relator to file, by November 13, 2017, an order signed by the local adm inistrative judge giving relator permission to file the Contempt Motion. We informed relator that failure to provide the requested documentation by November 13, 2017 would result in dismissal of the proceeding without further notice. In response to the Court’s November 3 , 2017 letter, relator filed a letter dated November 10, 2017 and asked the Court to transfer the Contempt Motion to cause number 05

- 17

- 01143

- CV. We denied the motion to transfer and, by order dated December 5, 2017, we ordered relator t o file, by December 19, 2017, an order signed by the local administrative judge giving relator permission to file the Contempt Motion. We informed relator in the order that failure to provide the requested documentation by December 19, 2017 would result i n dismissal of this proceeding without further notice. To date, relator has not provided this Court with a written order from the local administrative judge giving relator permission to file the Contempt Motion. Accordingly, we dismiss this proceeding. S ee T EX . C IV . P RAC . & R EM . C ODE A NN . § § 11.102(a) , 11.103 (West Supp. 2016) (a person who has been declared a vexatious litigant must seek and obtain p ermission to file a new litigation)
.

171263F.P05 /Craig Stoddart/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
No. 11-982.

#### Already, LLC, dba Yums *v.*Nike, Inc.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted.
#### Michelle LUNDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HEBRON HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-2388

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted February 1, 2018 *

Decided February 1, 2018

Rehearing En Banc Denied March 5, 2018

*267Michelle Lundy, Pro Se

Nora Elizabeth Gierke, Attorney, Rein-hart Boerner Van Deuren S.C., Milwaukee, WI, for Defendant-Appellee

Before DIANE P. WOOD, Chief Judge, MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge, AMY C. BARRETT, Circuit Judge

ORDER

Michelle Lundy, an African-American woman, filed this lawsuit against the operator of Hebron House, a homeless shelter, under the Fair Housing Act. She alleged that the shelter discriminated against her based on her race by unfairly requiring her to vacate the shelter after 90 days and denying her access to a rental-assistance program. The district court entered summary judgment for Hebron House, reasoning that Lundy had not adduced sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact about whether the shelter’s decisions were race-based and whether the shelter, as opposed to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, had any decision-making authority with respect to rental assistance.

Lundy appeals and contends that “remand. is required because the appellees discriminated based on race and [failed] to accurately follow HUD [guidelines] for the Homeless Prevention / Rapid Re-Housing Program.” That is the sum total of her argument; she does not claim to have raised any material disputes of fact backed up with evidence, nor does she cite any legal authority that supports her broad conclusion. Instead she recounts her personal history and repeats allegations from her complaint (and in her reply brief, attempts to add new factual allegations).

We construe pro se filings liberally, *Anderson v. Hardman,*241 F.3d 544, 545 (7th Cir. 2001), but we cannot meaningfully review an appellate argument that consists of a single bald conclusion. Even pro se litigants must comply with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 28(a)(8), *see Anderson,*241 F.3d at 545-46, which requires that a brief contain a cogent argument with citations to authority. Although we “are generally disposed toward providing a litigant the benefit of appellate review,” we will not concoct arguments or conduct legal research for a litigant. *Id.*at 545. Because Lundy has not presented an argument, we must dismiss her appeal.

DISMISSED
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 **ANNUALSTATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is herebymade to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1,2014, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, asDepositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer,TORCHLIGHT LOAN SERVICES, LLC, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Trustee, and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asCertificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and PARK BRIDGE LENDERSERVICES LLC as Operating Advisor with respect to Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, COMM 2014-CCRE20 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section10.11 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.      Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.      To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/ Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton 

ManagingDirector 

WellsFargo Bank 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
IA

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 15

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States barring

Federal unfunded mandates to the States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 7, 1997

Mr. FRANKS of New Jersey introduced the following joint resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States barring Federal unfunded mandates to the States.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years of its submission for ratification:
2

HJ 15 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘No State shall be obligated to take any action under

3 Federal law (other than this Constitution), enacted after

4 the ratification of this article, unless the expenses of tak5 ing such action are paid by the Federal Government; nor

6 shall Congress impose any conditions upon spending

7 grants to the States unless such conditions are substan8 tially related to the specific subject matter to which the

9 funds are expended.’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, David R. Melville, III, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Special Financial Report on Form 10-K of Business First Bancshares, Inc.;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|4. | Intentionally omitted.
|-- | ----------------------



|5. | Intentionally omitted.
|-- | ----------------------

Date: May 8, 2015



/s/ David R. Melville, III
David R. Melville, IIIPresident and Chief Executive Officer
#### MOUNTAIN VIEW COLONIAL APTS. v. ISAIS

20170685

Supreme Court of Utah.

11-06-2017

20160184, 400 P.3d 1166

Petition for Writ of Certiorari Denied.