alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 32 AND 33 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000930550
<NAME> FLORES & RUCKS, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           5,759
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,272
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                83,859
<PP&E>                                         544,390
<DEPRECIATION>                                 188,692
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 460,710
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,917
<BONDS>                                        284,142
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           196
<OTHER-SE>                                     104,957
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   460,710
<SALES>                                        188,451
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               188,451
<CGS>                                           47,098
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  137,904
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (395)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,954
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,988
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,037
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,951
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,951
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.05
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Fernando MANGUILA-PAEZ, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-60494 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 22, 2018

Chad Maleom Doleac, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Mississippi, Oxford, MS, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Fernando Manguila-Paez, Pro Se

Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Defendant-Appellant Fernando Mangui-la-Paez appeals his sentence for possession with the intent to distribute methamphetamine, distribution of methamphetamine, and possession of a firearm during a drug trafficking crime. 21 U.S.C, § 841(a), (b)(1)(C); 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A). The district court sentenced him within the guidelines range to a total of 157 months of imprisonment. Manguila-Paez challenges the district court’s denial of a mitigating role reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2.

Whether a defendant was a minor or minimal participant is a factual question that we' review for clear error. *United States v. Gomez-Valle,*828 F.3d 324, 328 (5th Cir. 2016)., A district court need not expressly weigh each factor in deciding whether to grant a mitigating role reduction. *United States v. Torres-Hernandez,*843 F.3d 203, 209 (5th Cir. 2016). Mangui-la-Paez drove a vehicle to a location where he picked up another co.conspirator, and they traveled together to a preplanned, secondary location where they intended to sell approximately one pound of methamphetamine to a buyer who, unbeknownst to them, was an undercover agent. In denying Manguila-Paez a § 3B1.2 adjustment, the district court relied on the fact that (1) he understood the nature of the transaction and his role in it, (2) a large quantity of methamphetamine was involved; (3) he was armed in case trouble ensued; and (4) he had previously been involved in drug transactions with one of his codefendants. The district court did not err in relying on these factors in refusing to grant Mangui-la-Paez a § 3B1.2 adjustment. *See United States v. Jimenez,*687 Fed.Appx. 395, 398 (5th Cir. 2017); *United States v. Ramirez-Esparza,*703 Fed.Appx. 276, 278, 279 n.3 (5th Cir. 2017).

Moreover, Manguila-Paez has failed to satisfy his burden of establishing the culpability of an average participant and that he was substantially less culpable than the average participant. *See United States v. Castro,*843 F.3d 608, 613 (5th Cir. 2016). The district court’s finding that Manguila-Paez was not substantially less culpable than the average participant was thus plausible in light of the record as a whole. § 3B1.2, comment. (n.3(A)); *see Torres-Hernandez,*843 F.3d at 207.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          13,817
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,207
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,077
<PP&E>                                         138,729
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,953
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 143,270
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,934
<BONDS>                                         60,930
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     18,388
<COMMON>                                           109
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,871
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   143,270
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,911
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,815
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,299
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,557
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,240
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,125
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,115
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,332
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,447
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .55
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>           BD
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from the financial statements for The
Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. for the 6 months ended
June 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         160,597
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,160,634
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                              115
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            364,651
<PP&E>                                         237,135
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,099,860
<SHORT-TERM>                                   452,925
<PAYABLES>                                   1,258,824
<REPOS-SOLD>                                   136,174
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                            134,303
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                              21,611
<LONG-TERM>                                    274,953
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     516,401
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,099,860
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                    0
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                           105,225
<COMMISSIONS>                                  889,148
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                   16,553
<FEE-REVENUE>                                  133,885
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,720
<COMPENSATION>                                 653,256
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                131,765
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     131,765
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   131,765
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-40373

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROGELIO LOPEZ MORENO, 

also known as “Pete,”

also known as “Peter,”

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:00-CR-39-11

- - - - - - - - - -

March 6, 2002

Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rogelio Lopez Moreno appeals his conviction and sentence for

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and heroin.

Moreno’s arguments focus on the application of Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and the fact that the original

indictment to which he pleaded guilty did not allege a drug

quantity. He argues that (1) the district court erred during

Moreno’s guilty plea hearing when it advised Moreno that he faced

a mandatory minimum sentence of ten years; (2) the district court
No. 01-40373

-2-

erred when it granted a § 5K1.1 downward departure but did not

depart lower than 120 months; and (3) the presentencing report’s

(PSR) findings regarding drug quantities lacked sufficient indicia

of reliability.

The district court did not err in its Rule 11 admonishment,

nor did it err in the application of a mandatory minimum sentence.

In cases where a drug quantity has not been alleged, Apprendi does

not invalidate the imposition of a mandatory minimum sentence under

§§ 841(b)(1)(A) or (b)(1)(B), as long as the sentence imposed does

not exceed the statutory maximum sentence under § 841(b)(1)(C).

See United States v. Keith, 230 F.3d 784, 787 (5th Cir. 2000),

cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1182 (2001). Moreno’s 120-month sentence

did not exceed the 20-year statutory maximum.

The district court did not err when it sentenced Moreno based

on drug quantities contained in the PSR. Moreno has failed to

present rebuttal evidence demonstrating the PSR’s inaccuracy;

therefore, the PSR is presumed reliable for calculating drug

quantity. See United States v. Franklin, 148 F.3d 451, 460 (5th

Cir. 1998). Accordingly, Moreno’s conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED.
#### COM. v. THOMAS, D.

1730 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/15/2017

CP-01-CR-0000557-2016 (Adams)

Affirmed
No. D-2723.

#### In re Discipline of Bennett.

Jeffrey Alan Bennett, of Doylestown, Pa., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
Order entered April 22, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00359-CV

LEE PURSER, Appellant

V.

BRENT L. CORALLI, JET TEXT, LLC, AND CORALLI, INC., Appellees

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 401-05082-2013

ORDER

We GRANT appellees’ April 19, 2016 unopposed motion for extension of time to file 

brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than April 29, 2016.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,994
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           830
<OTHER-SE>                                    (56,824)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,573
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,573)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,573)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,573)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.001)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1
------------

                                 CERTIFICATIONS


I, WILLIAM W. BURNHAM, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of TRUDY CORPORATION;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report; and

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
     quarterly report.


Date:  February 19, 2003


                                       /s/ WILLIAM W. BURNHAM
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       William W. Burnham,
                                       Principal Executive Officer



I, WILLIAM W. BURNHAM, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of TRUDY CORPORATION;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report; and

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
     quarterly report.


Date:  February 19, 2003


                                       /s/ WILLIAM W. BURNHAM
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       William W. Burnham,
                                       Acting Principal Financial Officer
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

Ms. Lauren E. Freeman 

Hunton & Williams LLP 

2200 Pennsylvania A venue, NW 

Washington, D.C. 20037-1701 

Dear Ms. Freeman: 

OCT 2 1 2014 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Thank you for your letter dated September 24, 2014, on behalf of the Utility Air Regulatory Group 

requesting an extension of the closing date for receipt of public comments on the supplemental proposal 

to address affirmative defense provisions in State Implementation Plans, issued by the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency on September 5, 2014. The EPA has considered your request, but has 

decided not to extend the comment period beyond the current closing date ofNovember 6~ 2014. By this 

letter, I want to notify you of that decision as promptly as possible so that you can plan to submit any 

comments on the supplemental proposal within the time already established. 

We are providing a comment period of 50 days from publication, 62 days from the date of posting the 

pre-publication version on the EPA website, and we believe that the comment period's current closing 

date allows sufficient time for all interested parties to develop and submit comments on the 

supplemental proposal. 

We trust this timely response is helpful and look forward to receiving your comments on the 

supplemental proposal. 

Sincerely, 

Janet G. McCabe 

Acting Assistant Administrator 

Internet Address (URL} • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlonne Free Recycled Paper
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of CHDT Corporation on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2008, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Report”), I, Laurie Holtz, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify
that:





(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Laurie
Holtz


Laurie
Holtz


Chief
Financial Officer, Director


(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)








October
28, 2008








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          50,278
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  552,314
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    118,314
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,054,635
<PP&E>                                       4,227,935
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,518,001
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,782,358
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,406,609
<BONDS>                                        127,531
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,508
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,152,682
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,782,358
<SALES>                                      5,493,924
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,493,924
<CGS>                                        2,744,569
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,744,569
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,235,836
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              99,735
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (586,216)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (586,216)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (586,216)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
        

</TABLE>