21024 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 69 / Monday, April 11, 2022 / Rules and Regulations 

email at regulation_comments@

nara.gov, or by telephone at 

301.837.3151. Contact rmstandards@

nara.gov with any questions on 

electronic records management. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Regulatory Analysis 

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory 

Planning and Review, and Executive 

Order 13563, Improving Regulation and 

Regulation Review 

The Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) has reviewed this rulemaking 

and determined it is not ‘‘significant’’ 

under section 3(f) of Executive Order 

12866. It is not significant because it 

involves agency internal procedures and 

is minor and administrative in nature 

and the changes are being made to align 

with the executive order. There is also 

not a public comment period on this 

revision, for good cause. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601, 

et seq.) 

This review requires an agency to 

prepare an initial regulatory flexibility 

analysis and publish it when the agency 

publishes the proposed rule. This 

requirement does not apply if the 

agency certifies that the rulemaking will 

not, if promulgated, have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities (5 U.S.C. 603). 

We certify, after review and analysis, 

that this rulemaking will not have a 

significant adverse economic impact on 

small entities. 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) 

The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.) requires 

that agencies consider the impact of 

paperwork and other information 

collection burdens imposed on the 

public and, under the provisions of PRA 

section 3507(d), obtain approval from 

OMB for each collection of information 

we conduct, sponsor, or require through 

regulations. This rulemaking does not 

impose additional information 

collection requirements on the public 

that are subject to the Paperwork 

Reduction Act. 

Executive Order 13132, Federalism 

Executive Order 13132 requires 

agencies to ensure state and local 

officials have the opportunity for 

meaningful and timely input when 

developing regulatory policies that may 

have a substantial, direct effect on the 

states, on the relationship between the 

Federal Government and the states, or 

on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. If the effects of the 

rule on state and local governments are 

sufficiently substantial, the agency must 

prepare a Federal assessment to assist 

senior policy makers. This rulemaking 

will not have any effects on state and 

local governments within the meaning 

of the E.O. Therefore, no federalism 

assessment is required. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (Sec. 

202, Pub. L. 104–4; 2 U.S.C. 1532) 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

requires that agencies determine 

whether any Federal mandate in the 

rulemaking may result in state, local, 

and tribal governments, in the aggregate, 

or the private sector, expending $100 

million in any one year. NARA certifies 

that this rulemaking does not contain a 

Federal mandate that may result in such 

an expenditure. 

List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 1213 

Administrative practice and 

procedure. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, NARA amends 36 CFR part 

1213 as follows: 

PART 1213—AGENCY GUIDANCE 

PROCEDURES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 1213 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 44 U.S.C. 2104(a). 

§ 1213.4 [Amended] 

■ 2. Amend § 1213.4 by: 

■ a. Removing paragraph (b)(2)(v) and 

redesignating paragraphs (b)(2)(vi) and 

(vii) as paragraphs (b)(2)(v) and (vi); 

■ b. Adding the word ‘‘and’’ at the end 

of newly redesignated paragraph 

(b)(2)(vi); 

■ c. In paragraph (b)(3), removing ‘‘; 

and’’ and adding a period in its place; 

■ d. Removing paragraph (b)(4); and 

■ e. In paragraph (f), removing 

‘‘§ 1213.6(a)’’ and adding ‘‘§ 1213.6’’ in 

its place. 

§ 1213.6 [Amended] 

■ 3. Amend § 1213.6 by: 

■ a. Removing paragraphs (b) and (c); 

and 

■ b. Removing the paragraph 

designation from paragraph (a) and 

removing the last sentence of the 

paragraph. 

§ 1213.8 [Amended] 

■ 4. Amend § 1213.8(d) by removing ‘‘, 

set forth in E.O. 12866, E.O. 13563, E.O. 

13609, E.O. 13771, and E.O. 13777’’ 

from the end of the last sentence. 

§ 1213.14 [Removed] 

■ 5. Remove § 1213.14. 

David S. Ferriero, 

Archivist of the United States. 

[FR Doc. 2022–07580 Filed 4–8–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7515–01–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R08–OAR–2021–0807; FRL–9680–02– 

R8] 

Air Plan Approval; South Dakota; 

Revisions to South Dakota Codified 

Law and Administrative Rules of South 

Dakota 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: With this direct final rule, the 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA 

or the ‘‘Agency’’) is promulgating 

approval of South Dakota’s submittal 

requesting that EPA recognize the 

merger of South Dakota’s Department of 

Agriculture (DOA) with the Department 

of Environment and Natural Resources 

(DENR) to form the new Department of 

Agriculture and Natural Resources 

(DANR) and incorporate corresponding 

non-substantive revisions to the South 

Dakota Codified Law (SDCL) and the 

Administrative Rules of South Dakota 

(ARSD) into South Dakota’s 

Implementation Plan. Accordingly, EPA 

is taking this final action in accordance 

with Clean Air Act (CAA). 

DATES: This direct final rule is effective 

on June 10, 2022 without further notice, 

unless EPA receives adverse written 

comments on or before May 11, 2022. If 

adverse comments are received, EPA 

will publish a timely withdrawal of the 

direct final rule in the Federal Register 

informing the public that the rule will 

not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

No. EPA–R08–OAR–2021–0807. All 

documents in the docket are listed in 

the www.regulations.gov index. 

Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

e.g., CBI or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy. Publicly 

available docket materials are available 

electronically in www.regulations.gov. 

To reduce the risk of COVID–19 

transmission, for this action we do not 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 69 / Monday, April 11, 2022 / Rules and Regulations 21025 

1SD DANR Merger SIP Submittal, January 21, 

2022, p. 27–28, Letter from Steven R. Blair, 

Assistant Attorney General, South Dakota Office of 

Attorney General, to Deb Thomas, Acting Regional 

Administrator, EPA Region 8, Re: Establishment of 

South Dakota Department of Agriculture and 

Natural Resources, April 16, 2021. 

2SD DANR Merger SIP Submittal, p.1, Letter from 

Hunter Roberts, Secretary, South Dakota 

Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 

to KC Becker, Regional Administrator, EPA Region 

8, January 20, 2022. 

3SD DANR Merger SIP Submittal, p. 27–28. 

4SD DANR Merger SIP Submittal, p. 9. 

5SD DANR Merger SIP Submittal, p.1. 

6SD DANR Merger SIP Submittal, p. 2–7. 

7See SD DANR Merger SIP Submittal, p. 33. In 

addition to the listed provisions in Table 1, South 

Dakota also included ARSD 74:37:01:08 in the 

submittal. This provision is not included as part of 

the EPA-approved SIP. Accoridngly, we are not 

taking action to include the revised 74:37:01:08 in 

South Dakota’s approved SIP. See Email dated 

March 4, 2022, from Kyrik Rombough, Engineer 

Manager III, South Dakota Department of 

Agriculture and Natural Resources, to Monica 

Morales, Acting Deputy Director, EPA Region 8 Air 

and Radiation Division. 

plan to offer hard copy review of the 

docket. Please email or call the person 

listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section if you need to make 

alternative arrangements for access to 

the docket. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate 

Gregory, Air and Radiation Division, 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P–ARD– 

QP, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, 

Colorado 80202–1129, telephone 

number: (303) 312–6175, email address: 

gregory.kate@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ means EPA. 

I. Why is EPA using a direct final rule? 

EPA is publishing this rule without 

prior proposal because the Agency 

views this as a noncontroversial action 

and anticipates no adverse comments. 

However, in the Proposed Rules section 

of this issue of the Federal Register 

publication, EPA is publishing a 

separate document that will serve as the 

proposal to approve revisions to both 

the SDCL and the ARSD. If EPA receives 

adverse comments, EPA will publish a 

timely withdrawal in the Federal 

Register informing the public that this 

direct final rule will not take effect. EPA 

will address all public comments in a 

subsequent final rule based on the 

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a 

second comment period on this action. 

Any parties interested in commenting 

must do so at this time. 

II. Background 

On April 16, 2021, South Dakota’s 

Office of Attorney General submitted a 

letter notifying EPA of the establishment 

of the South Dakota DANR. The letter 

stated that on January 19, 2021, South 

Dakota Governor, Kristi Noem, executed 

Executive Order 2021–03, which 

provided for the merger of the South 

Dakota DOA and the South Dakota 

DENR into one department—the DANR. 

According to the South Dakota 

Constitution, executive reorganization 

orders become effective ‘‘within ninety 

days after submission’’ of the executive 

order to the South Dakota Legislature 

(Legislature) unless one of the two 

houses of the Legislature disapproves of 

the executive reorganization (S.D. 

Constitution, Article IV, Section 8).1

During the 2021 session, neither house 

of the Legislature passed a resolution of 

disapproval of Governor Noem’s 

Executive Order 2021–03 and the Order 

became effective April 19, 2021.2

In the letter submitted by the South 

Dakota Office of Attorney General, 

Assistant Attorney General Steven R. 

Blair stated that all State programs 

previously authorized to carry out EPA 

programs would continue to function in 

the same manner and all current 

environmental protection activities 

conducted under existing EPA approved 

or delegated programs under the DOA 

and/or the DENR would continue intact 

under the newly established DANR. 

Further, Mr. Blair stated that the merger 

caused no substantive budgetary or 

personnel changes, that the new DANR 

has all the authorities, powers, and 

duties of the previous DOA and DENR, 

and that the laws in effect at the time 

EPA approved or delegated authority to 

DOA and/or DENR continue to be fully 

effective and enforceable. Mr. Blair 

explained that the merger did not 

require any substantive changes to state 

law or administrative rules; the statutes 

and rules were merely updated to reflect 

the name of the new department.3

III. State Submittal 

On January 21, 2022, pursuant to 40 

CFR part 51, South Dakota submitted a 

request that EPA recognize the merger of 

South Dakota’s DOA with the DENR to 

form the new DANR and incorporate 

corresponding revisions to the SDCL 

and the ARSD into South Dakota’s 

Implementation Plan at 40 CFR 52.2170. 

The January 21, 2022 submission 

included a letter from the Secretary of 

the DANR, Hunter Roberts, as the 

Governor’s designee.4 Secretary Roberts 

stated that the SDCL and ARSD were 

automatically updated with DANR’s 

new name during the merger process. 

Additionally, Secretary Roberts stated 

that South Dakota’s Board of Minerals 

and Environment approved the DANR’s 

request to ask EPA to recognize the 

department’s new name in South 

Dakota’s State Implementation Plan 

(SIP) at 40 CFR 52.2170 during a public 

hearing on December 16, 2021. 

Secretary Roberts further confirmed that 

the merger did not cause a substantive 

change to state law or administrative 

rules and that DANR maintains the 

same authorities, powers, and duties 

covered and implemented under the 

previous department name.5

South Dakota’s submittal included 

clean and redlined copies of the revised 

SDCL and ARSD, which are available in 

the docket for this action. The nonsubstantive revisions became effective 

on April 19, 2021.6 The submittal also 

included evidence that public notice of 

the State’s proposed submittal ran in 

eleven South Dakota newpapers and a 

public hearing was held on December 

16, 2021, demonstrating compliance 

with 40 CFR 51.102. The State received 

no public comments. 

The SDCL and ARSD approved into 

South Dakota’s SIP as revised are listed 

in Table 1 below.7

TABLE 1—REVISIONS TO SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA CODIFIED LAW

(SDCL) AND ADMINISTRATIVE RULES

OF SOUTH DAKOTA (ARSD) AIR

POLLUTION CONTROL RULES

SDCL: 

34A–1–2 

34A–1–58.1 

34A–1–60 

34A–1–63 

ARSD: 

74:36:01:01(19) 

74:36:01:01(55) 

IV. Final Action 

South Dakota submitted the necessary 

information for EPA to review the nonsubstantive revisions to South Dakota’s 

statutes and administrative rules to 

reflect the merger of South Dakota’s 

DOA with the DENR to form the new 

DANR. With the exception of 

74:37:01:08, which is part of South 

Dakota’s approved CAA title V program 

rather than part of South Dakota’s 

approved SIP, EPA is now acting to 

approve the non-substantive revisions to 

the SDCL and ARSD air pollution 

control rules into the SIP at 40 CFR 

52.2170. 

V. Incorporation by Reference 

In this document, EPA is finalizing 

regulatory text in an EPA final rule that 

includes incorporation by reference. In 

accordance with the requirements of 1 

CFR 5.15, EPA is finalizing the 

incorporation by reference of the 

regulations described in section III of 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
21026 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 69 / Monday, April 11, 2022 / Rules and Regulations 

this preamble and as set forth in the 

amendments to 40 CFR 52.2170 below. 

EPA has made, and will continue to 

make, these materials generally 

available through https://

www.regulations.gov and at the EPA 

Region 8 Office (please contact the 

person identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section of this 

preamble for more information). 

Therefore, these materials have been 

approved by EPA for inclusion in the 

SIP, have been incorporated by 

reference by EPA into that plan, are 

fully federally enforceable under 

sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of 

the effective date of the final rule of 

EPA’s approval, and will be 

incorporated by reference by the 

Director of the Federal Register in the 

next update to the SIP compilation. 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

Act and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely proposes to approve state law as 

meeting Federal requirements and does 

not impose additional requirements 

beyond those imposed by state law. For 

that reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, the SIP is not approved 

to apply on any Indian reservation land 

or in any other area where EPA or an 

Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 

tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 

Indian country, the proposed rule does 

not have tribal implications and will not 

impose substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by June 10, 2022. 

Filing a petition for reconsideration by 

the Administrator of this final rule does 

not affect the finality of this action for 

the purposes of judicial review nor does 

it extend the time within which a 

petition for judicial review may be filed, 

and shall not postpone the effectiveness 

of such rule or action. This action may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements (see section 

307(b)(2)). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Greenhouse gases, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 

Particulate matter, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur 

oxides, Volatile organic compounds. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: April 2, 2022. 

KC Becker, 

Regional Administrator, Region 8. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart QQ—South Dakota 

■ 2. In § 52.2170: 

■ a. The table in paragraph (c) is 

amended by revising the entry 

‘‘74:36:01:01’’. 

■ b. The table in paragraph (e) is 

amended by adding the entry ‘‘XXVII. 

South Dakota Codified Laws, 34A–1–2, 

34A–1–58.1, 34A–1–60 and 34A–1–63’’ 

in numerical order. 

The revision and addition read as 

follows: 

§ 52.2170 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

Rule No. Rule title 

State 

effective 

date 

EPA 

effective 

date 

Final rule citation, date Comments 

Statewide 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 69 / Monday, April 11, 2022 / Rules and Regulations 21027 

Rule No. Rule title 

State 

effective 

date 

EPA 

effective 

date 

Final rule citation, date Comments 

*******

74:36:01. Definitions 

74:36:01:01 ........................ Definitions ......................... 04/19/2021 5/11/2022 [insert Federal Register 

citation], 4/11/2022.

* * * * * * * 

* * * * * (e) * * * 

Rule title 

State 

effective 

date 

EPA 

effective 

date 

Final rule citation, date Comments 

*******

XXVII. South Dakota Codified Laws, 34A–1–2, 34A–1–58.1, 

34A–1–60 and 34A–1–63.

4/19/21 5/11/2022 [insert Federal Register 

citation], 4/11/2022.

[FR Doc. 2022–07416 Filed 4–8–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2021–0885; FRL–9523–02– 

R5] 

Air Plan Approval; Wisconsin; 

Redesignation of the Wisconsin 

Portion of the Chicago-Naperville, 

Illinois-Indiana-Wisconsin Area to 

Attainment of the 2008 Ozone Standard 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) finds that the ChicagoNaperville, IL-IN-WI area (Chicago area) 

is attaining the 2008 ozone National 

Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS 

or standard) and, in response to a 

request from the Wisconsin Department 

of Natural Resources (Wisconsin or the 

State), is redesignating the Wisconsin 

portion of the area to attainment for the 

2008 ozone NAAQS, because the State 

has met the statutory requirements for 

redesignation under the Clean Air Act 

(CAA). EPA is approving, as a revision 

to the Wisconsin State Implementation 

Plan (SIP), the State’s plan for 

maintaining the 2008 ozone NAAQS 

through 2035 for the Wisconsin portion 

of the Chicago area. EPA finds adequate 

and is approving Wisconsin’s 2030 and 

2035 volatile organic compound (VOC) 

and oxides of nitrogen (NOX) Motor 

Vehicle Emission Budgets (Budgets) for 

the Wisconsin portion. Finally, 

pursuant to section 110 and part D of 

the CAA, EPA is approving the 

enhanced Inspection/Maintenance (I/M) 

program certification included in 

Wisconsin’s December 3, 2021 

submittal, because it satisfies the serious 

enhanced I/M requirements for the 

Wisconsin portion. EPA proposed to 

approve this action on February 7, 2022, 

and received no comments. 

DATES: This final rule is effective on 

April 11, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

No. EPA–R05–OAR–2021–0885. All 

documents in the docket are listed on 

the www.regulations.gov website. 

Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

i.e., Confidential Business Information 

(CBI) or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either through 

www.regulations.gov or at the 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding Federal holidays and 

facility closures due to COVID–19. We 

recommend that you telephone Michael 

Leslie, Environmental Engineer at (312) 

353–6680 before visiting the Region 5 

office. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael Leslie, Environmental 

Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air 

Programs Branch (AR18J), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353–6680, 

leslie.michael@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. 

I. Background Information 

On February 7, 2022 (87 FR 6006), 

EPA proposed to find that the Chicago 

area is attaining the 2008 ozone 

NAAQS, in response to a request from 

the Wisconsin, and is redesignating the 

Wisconsin portion of the area to 

attainment for the 2008 ozone NAAQS, 

because the State has met the statutory 

requirements for redesignation under 

the CAA. The Wisconsin portion of the 

Chicago 2008 ozone area consists of the 

portion of Kenosha County bounded by 

the I–94 corridor and the area east to 

Lake Michigan (Wisconsin portion). 

Wisconsin submitted this request on 

December 3, 2021. EPA proposed to 

approve, as a revision to the Wisconsin 

SIP, the State’s plan for maintaining the 

2008 ozone NAAQS through 2035 for 

the Wisconsin portion. EPA also 

proposed to approve and find adequate 

Wisconsin’s 2030 and 2035 VOC and 

NOX Budgets for the Wisconsin portion. 

Finally, pursuant to section 110 and 

part D of the CAA, EPA proposed to 

approve the enhanced I/M certification, 

because it satisfies the serious enhanced 

I/M requirements for the Wisconsin 

portion. The public comment period for 

this proposed rule ended on March 9, 

2022. EPA received no comments on the 

proposal. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1