alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Threat Reduction Agency 

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  DTRA Leadership             
  -  DTRA History             
  -  Mission             
  -  Strategic Initiatives             
  -  Foreign Malign Influence             
  -  Agency Overview Brief (pdf)             
  -  Agency Financial Report 
-  Careers & Opportunities    -  Your Civilian Career             
  -  Your Military Career             
  -  Welcome Aboard             
  -  Diversity and Inclusion 
-  Business    -  DTRA Contract Award Data             
  -  Office of Small Business             
  -  Mentor Protege Program 
-  News & Media    -  Press Center 
-  Contact Us		 
-  Joint Operations Center		 

# Foreign Malign Influence Fact Sheets

Aug. 1, 2023

 Biological Threat Reduction Program BTRP  

                                Biological Threat Reduction Program protects the United States, its Armed Forces and our allies from biological threats by strengthening the capabilities of partner nations and the international community to prevent, detect and prepare for outbreaks caused by biothreat pathogens.             

### Stay Connected

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Castle Dental Centers, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Joseph P. Keane, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. (S)1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 19, 2002



                                   /s/ Joseph P. Keane
                                   -----------------------------------------
                                   Joseph P. Keane, Chief Financial Officer
No. 11-1435.

#### Bolmer *v.*Connolly Properties, Inc., et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CPS Technologies Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended March 29, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Grant C. Bennett, President and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:	May 12, 2008
/s/	Grant C. Bennett
Grant C. Bennett
President and Treasurer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.3


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in the
Registration Statement (Form S-3) and related Prospectus of US Unwired, Inc. for
the registration of 546,396 shares of its common stock and to the incorporation
by reference therein of our report dated January 25, 2002, except for Note 14 as
to which the date is February 8, 2002, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of US Unwired, Inc. included in its Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


                                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Houston, Texas
March 27, 2002
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Hilario GONZALEZ-ROSALES Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-10548 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed January 2, 2018

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Jerry Van Beard, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Michael Arthur Leh-mann, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Hilario Gonzalez-Rosales appeals the two-year term of supervised release imposed by the district court following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues that his sentence violates due process because it exceeds the statutory maximum supervised release term that can be imposed for a violation of § 1326(a). *See*18 U.S.C. §§ 3559(a)(5), 3683(b)(3). He asserts that he was not subject to the enhanced penalties set forth in § 1326(b) because no felony offense was alleged in the indictment. He concedes that the issue whether his eligibility for a sentencing enhancement under § 1326(b) must be alleged in the indictment and proved to a jury is foreclosed *by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). However, he seeks to preserve the issue for possible Supreme Court review because, he argues, subsequent Supreme Court decisions indicate that the Court may reconsider this issue.

In *Almendarez-Torres,*523 U.S. at 239-47, 118 S.Ct. 1219, the Supreme Court held that for purposes of a statutory sentencing enhancement, a prior conviction is not a fact that must be alleged in an indictment or found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. This court has held that subsequent Supreme Court decisions did not overrule *Almendarez-Torres. See United States v. Wallace,*759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 2014) (considering the effect of *Alleyne v. United States,*570 U.S. 99, 133 S.Ct. 2151, 186 L.Ed.2d 314 (2013)); *United States v. Pineda-Arrellano,*492 F.3d 624, 625-26 (5th Cir. 2007) (considering the effect of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000)). Thus, Gonzalez-Rosales’s argument is foreclosed.

Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4,
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 242 (Friday, December 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 79071]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31714]

[[Page 79071]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending November 13, 2010

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions To Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2010-0279.
    Date Filed: November 12, 2010.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion To Modify 
Scope: December 3, 2010.
    Description: Application of Arik Air Limited requesting a foreign 
air carrier permit and exemption authority to provide scheduled air 
transportation of persons, property and mail between Nigeria and the 
United States.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-1996-1657.
    Date Filed: November 12, 2010.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion To Modify 
Scope: December 3, 2010.
    Description: Application of Alaska Central Express, Inc. (``Alaska 
Central'') requesting fitness determination and reissuance of its 
certificate of public convenience and necessity to the extent necessary 
to permit Alaska Central to conduct scheduled interstate passenger 
operations with aircraft having a maximum passenger capacity of less 
than 60 seats or a maximum payload capacity of no more than 18,000 
pounds, and to reissue its certificate without the condition limiting 
its passenger authority to charter air transportation.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2010-31714 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
#### Tito Lamont ANDERSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Justin ANDREWS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 15-7742

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 17, 2017

Decided: January 8, 2018

Tito Lamont Anderson, Appellant Pro Se.

. Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tito Lamont Anderson, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. §. 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Anderson relies on the savings clause in 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e) (2012) to challenge his career offender designation, but we have “not extended the reach of the savings clause to those petitioners challenging only their sentence.” *United States v. Poole,*581 F.3d 263, 267 n.7 (4th Cir. 2008). As such, Anderson fails to satisfy his burden of demonstrating that 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) is an inadequate or ineffective means of challenging the validity of his detention. *See Rice v. Rivera,*617 F.3d 802, 807 (4th Cir. 2010).

We thus conclude that the district court properly dismissed without prejudice Anderson’s § 2241 petition. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Anderson v. Andrews,*No. 5:15-hc-02061-FL (E.D.N.C. Oct. 15, 2015). We grant Anderson leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
<PAGE>
 
                                 EXHIBIT 23.2

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in the 
Registration Statement (Form S-8) pertaining to the Reliability Incorporated 
1997 Stock Option Plan and to the incorporation by reference therein of our 
report dated January 31, 1997, except for Note 9, as to which the date is 
February 17, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and 
schedule of Reliability Incorporated included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) 
for the year ended December 31, 1996, filed with the Securities and Exchange 
Commission.


                                        /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP




Houston, Texas
May 6, 1997


                                      15
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 67 (Thursday, April 7, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20432-20433]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07394]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket Nos. FDA-2013-N-1529, FDA-2014-D-0609, FDA-2012-N-0961, FDA-
2021-N-1022, FDA-2018-N-4130, and FDA-2018-N-3037]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office 
of Management and Budget Approvals

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is publishing a list of 
information collections that have been approved by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ila S. Mizrachi, Office of Operations, 
Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A-12M, 11601 
Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852, 301-796-7726, 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a list of FDA information 
collections recently approved by OMB under section 3507 of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507). The OMB control 
number and expiration date of OMB approval for each information 
collection are shown in table 1. Copies of the supporting statements 
for the information collections are available on the internet at 
https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. An Agency may not conduct or 
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of 
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

[[Page 20433]]

        Table 1--List of Information Collections Approved by OMB
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            OMB control    Date approval
           Title of collection                  No.           expires
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reclassification Petitions for Medical         0910-0138       2/28/2025
 Devices................................
Pharmaceutical Distribution Supply Chain       0910-0806       2/28/2025
Environmental Impact Considerations.....       0910-0322       3/31/2025
Reporting Associated with Food Additive        0910-0546       3/31/2025
 Petitions, Investigational Food
 Additive Files Exemptions, and
 Declaration of Color Additives on
 Animal Food Labels.....................
Recordkeeping Requirements for                 0910-0658       3/31/2025
 Microbiological Testing and Corrective
 Measures for Bottled Water.............
Generic Clearance for Quantitative             0910-0865       3/31/2025
 Testing for the Development of FDA
 Communications (CFSAN).................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: March 30, 2022.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-07394 Filed 4-6-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          21,319
<SECURITIES>                                    63,091
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,085
<ALLOWANCES>                                       404
<INVENTORY>                                      6,029
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               117,956
<PP&E>                                          17,776
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,704
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 134,622
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,290
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            31
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     129,301
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   134,622
<SALES>                                         36,796
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,796
<CGS>                                            6,644
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,644
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,449
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,032
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,661
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,371
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.39
                                              
                                              

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 224 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 224

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 15, 1998

      Received and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas many children in the United States have been abducted by family members 
        who are foreign nationals and living in foreign countries;
Whereas children who have been abducted by an estranged father are very rarely 
        returned, through legal remedies, from countries that only recognize the 
        custody rights of the father;
Whereas there are at least 140 cases that need to be resolved in which children 
        have been abducted by family members and taken to foreign countries;
Whereas, although the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child 
        Abduction, done at the Hague on October 25, 1980, has made progress in 
        aiding the return of abducted children, the Convention does not address 
        the criminal aspects of child abduction, and there is a need to reach 
        agreements regarding child abduction with countries that are not parties 
        to the Convention; and
Whereas decisions on awarding custody of children should be made in the 
        children's best interest, and persons who violate laws of the United 
        States by abducting their children should not be rewarded by being 
        granted custody of those children: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress urges international cooperation in working to resolve 
those cases in which children in the United States are abducted by 
family members who are foreign nationals and taken to foreign 
countries, and in seeing that justice is served by holding accountable 
the abductors for violations of criminal law.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 14, 1998.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 of Lyondell Chemical Company of the following
reports, which appear in Lyondell Chemical Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2001.

         .   Our report dated March 8, 2002 on our audits of the consolidated
             financial statements of Lyondell Chemical Company as of December
             31, 2001 and 2000 and for each of the three years in the period
             ended December 31, 2001.

         .   Our report dated February 4, 2002 on our audits of the financial
             statements of LYONDELL-CITGO Refining LP as of December 31, 2001
             and 2000 and for each of the three years in the period ended
             December 31, 2001.

         .   Our report dated March 8, 2002 on our audits of the consolidated
             financial statements of Equistar Chemicals, LP as of December 31,
             2001 and 2000 and for each of the three years in the period ended
             December 31, 2001.

                                                  /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Houston, Texas
October 21, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM J. RAY
MCDERMOTT'S DECEMBER 31, 1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         197,813
<SECURITIES>                                     1,876
<RECEIVABLES>                                  303,841
<ALLOWANCES>                                    27,418
<INVENTORY>                                     57,154
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               621,382
<PP&E>                                       1,239,676
<DEPRECIATION>                                 831,751
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,486,083
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          501,205
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         32
<COMMON>                                           405
<OTHER-SE>                                     584,344
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,486,083
<SALES>                                      1,074,143
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,074,143
<CGS>                                        1,051,328
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,051,328
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,254
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 76,128
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,474
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             52,654
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    52,654
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.16
        

</TABLE>