alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

Certification Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Stephen P. Smith., certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Columbia Pipeline Group, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015;
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |               |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|----- |  | ------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: |  | April 7, 2016 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Stephen P. Smith   
|      |  |               |  |  |  |     |  | Stephen P. Smith       
|      |  |               |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
** **

**EXHIBIT 31.2**

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, Luis F. Saenz, certifythat:

 

6.      	I have reviewedthis Annual Report on Form 10-K of Loreto Resources Corporation.

 

7.	      Based on my knowledge,this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

8.      	Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

9.      	I am responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant andhave;

 

   (a)	  Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

   (b)	  Designed suchinternal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under your supervision,to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

   (c)	  Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

 

  (d)  	Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarterof the registrant’s 2011 fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

10.	      I have disclosed,based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

  (a)	  All significantdeficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,****summarize and report financial information;and

 

  (b)  	Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
No. 11-9025.

#### Osburn *v.*Arkansas.

Sup. Ct. Ark. Certio-rari denied.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Thomas YARBROUGH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-30142

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 13, 2018 **

Filed February 16, 2018

Helen J. Brunner, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Carl Andrew Colasurdo, Assistant U.S. Attorney, DOJ-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Sara Brin, Trial Attorney, FPDWA— Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Washington, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellant

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

**

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Yarbrough’s request to submit this case on the briefs is, therefore, granted.

MEMORANDUM *

Christopher Thomas Yarbrough appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 14-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Yarbrough contends that the district court procedurally erred by imposing sentence based on the seriousness of the underlying offense and other improper sentencing factors, and that it imposed an unreasonable sentence.

The record reflects that the district court considered Yarbrough’s underlying offense in connection with permissible 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) sentencing factors, including Yarbrough’s history and characteristics and the need to protect the public, and to assess the extent of Yarbrough’s breach of the court’s trust. *See United States v.*Simtob, 485 F.3d 1058, 1062-63 (9th Cir. 2007) (nature and severity of the underlying offense can be considered as part of the criminal history of the violator because it is relevant to the violator’s propensity for recidivism, the threat he poses to the public, and the extent of his breach of the district court’s trust). The court heard argument from Yarbrough that seriousness of the offense was not an appropriate sentencing consideration, and the court explained that Yarbrough was being sentenced for his failure to comply with the conditions of supervision, and not for the state court conviction that resulted in the revocation. On this record, we conclude that the court did not base the revocation sentence primarily on the basis of improp*675er sentencing factors. *See id.*at 1063. Moreover, the within-Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the section 3583(e) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances. *See Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Golden River Resources
Corporation  (the "Company") for the six months ended December 31, 2009 as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"),
the  undersigned,  Joseph  Gutnick,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  the Company,
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  that:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)     The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the     financial  condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:    February 15, 2010

                                      /S/Joseph I. Gutnick
                                      --------------------
                                      Joseph  I.  Gutnick
                                      Chairman  of  the  Board,  President  and
                                      Chief  Executive  Officer

                                       35
EXHIBIT 32.1








Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350


(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





Ladies and Gentlemen:





In connection with the filing by Millennia, Inc. (the “Company”) of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of each of the undersigned’s knowledge, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date: April 7, 2011
/s/ John Bryant

John Bryant, Chief Executive Officer





/s/ Stanley Wright

Stanley Wright, Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements for The Jones Financial Companies for the 3 months ended
March 28, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000815917
<NAME> THE JONES FINANCIAL COMPANIES, L.P., LLP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          64,309
<RECEIVABLES>                                  723,314
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                             70,000
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                            9,481
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            222,825
<PP&E>                                         175,562
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,335,271
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<PAYABLES>                                     608,001
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                              8,193
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                              18,932
<LONG-TERM>                                    281,525
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     259,997
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,335,271
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                    0
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                            18,735
<COMMISSIONS>                                  219,056
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                    3,337
<FEE-REVENUE>                                   20,726
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,273
<COMPENSATION>                                 149,751
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,746
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      23,746
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,746
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Next Phase of Training Successfully Completed in Georgia
 
  By Courtesy of State Security Service of Georgia Public Relations
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Fabiola SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-50391 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed January 3, 2018

*828Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Fabiola Sanchez, Pro Se

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Fabiola Sanchez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Sanchez has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Sanchez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo-lous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### CIARDI, K. v. CIARDI, A.

2568 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/19/2017

No. 00649N2011

PACSES No. 563112476

(Chester)

Affirmed
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Tony Tong, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q/A#1 of PacificNet Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A#1
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of PacificNet Inc.

I, Joseph Levinson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q/A#1 of PacificNet Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A#1
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of PacificNet Inc.


By: /s/ Tony Tong
    ---------------------
    Tony Tong
    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
    (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: November 3, 2006


By: /s/ Joseph Levinson
    ---------------------
    Joeseph Levinson
    Chief Financial Officer
    (Principal Financial Officer)

Date: November 3, 2006
No. 11-10060.

#### Martinez *v.*Trombley, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities

                        On April 1, 2015, by Executive Order 13694, the President declared a national emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701*et seq.*) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States constituted by the increasing prevalence and severity of malicious cyber-enabled activities originating from, or directed by persons located, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States. On December 28, 2016, the President issued Executive Order 13757 to take additional steps to address the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13694.                    

These significant malicious cyber-enabled activities continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared on April 1, 2015, must continue in effect beyond April 1, 2022. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13694.

                        This notice shall be published in the                         *Federal Register*                         and transmitted to the Congress.                    

[FR Doc. 2022-07025

Billing code 3395-F2-P
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Veterans Affairs
 The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2, that the VA Voluntary Service (VAVS) National Advisory Committee (NAC) will meet on April 27-29, 2022 at the DoubleTree by Hilton located at 3203 Quebec Street in Denver, Colorado 80207. The meeting sessions will begin and end as follows: Meeting date(s):
Meeting time(s):Wednesday, April 27, 2022
9:00 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. Mountain Time (MT).Thursday, April 28, 2022
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. MT.Friday, April 29, 2022
9:00 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. MT.
 The meeting sessions are open to the public. The Committee, comprised of 55 major Veteran, civic, and service organizations, advises the Secretary, through the Under Secretary for Health, on the coordination and promotion of volunteer activities and strategic partnerships within VA health care facilities, in the community, and on matters related to volunteerism and charitable giving. Agenda topics will include the NAC goals and objectives; review of minutes from the May 26-28, 2021 meeting; an update on VA Center for Development and Civic Engagement (CDCE) activities; Veterans Health Administration update; subcommittee reports; review of standard operating procedures; review of organization data; Federal Advisory Committee Act training provided by the VA Advisory Committee Management Office; human-centered design; maximizing social media; and any new business. No time will be allocated at this meeting for receiving oral presentations from the public. However, the public may submit written statements for the Committee's review to Dr. Sabrina C. Clark, Designated Federal Officer, VA Center for Development and Civic Engagement (15CDCE), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20420, or email at 
                    *Sabrina.Clark@VA.gov.*
                     Any member of the public wishing to attend the meeting or seeking additional information should contact Dr. Clark at 202-461-7300. Dated: April 4, 2022. Jelessa M. Burney, Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer.


[FR Doc. 2022-07410 Filed 4-6-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Julie A. Roberts v. Nexus Health Systems, Inc.

, et a l.

Appellate case number: 01

- 19

- 00175

- CV

Trial court case number: 2016

- 84120

Trial court: 334th District Cour t of H arris County

Appellant , J u lie A. Roberts, has filed a “ Joint Motion t o Stay Appeal Pending Bankruptcy Court

Review a nd Approval o f Settlement

. ” The motion requests that the appeal be “ stayed

, ” while the

parties seek appr oval of their settlem ent from the Bankruptcy Court

.

Roberts request for a stay is i nterpr eted as a request to a bate t he appeal . As interpreted , t he

motion is granted, and the appeal is abated

.

The appeal is removed from the Court’s October 27 , 2020 submission docket a nd oral argum ent

is cancel led

.

The appeal w ill be reins tated 60 days from the date of thi s order on the C o urt ’ s active doc ket for

later submission on the meri ts

. However, a par ty ma y file a mot ion to reinstate the appeal for

dismissal or for submission on the merits b efore the expiration of 60 days

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Richard High tower

___________ Acting individually

Date: Oc tober 26, 2020
IA

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 118

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to authorize

the line item veto.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 11, 1998

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to authorize the line item veto.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission

9 for ratification:
2

•HJ 118 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE —

2 ‘‘In the case of any bill, order, resolution, or vote

3 which is presented to the President under section 7 of Ar4 ticle I of this Constitution, the President may decline to

5 approve in whole any dollar amount of discretionary budg6 et authority, any item of new direct spending, or any lim7 ited tax benefit. The failure of the President to approve

8 a matter under this article of amendment shall be treated

9 in the same manner as the failure of the President to ap10 prove a bill, order, resolution, or vote presented to the

11 President under section 7 of Article I of this Constitu12 tion.’’.

Æ