alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY
2800 DEFENSE PENTAGON
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20301-2800

OCT 16 2023
MEMORANDUM FOR DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY WORKFORCE

SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2024 Anti-Harassment Policy Statement

The Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) prohibits harassment and
retaliation against an employee for reporting harassment. This includes harassment that is not
unlawful but adversely affects the work environment. Any DSCA employee who engages in
harassing or retaliatory conduct is subject to disciplinary action. All personnel within DSCA
will be treated with dignity and respect. | will neither tolerate nor condone harassment, and I
will promptly and effectively address any allegation of harassment. DSCA's Talent
Management (TM) Directorate manages the Agency's anti-harassment program in partnership
with the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) and in accordance with DSCA Instruction 1020.01,
“Workplace Harassment Prevention and Response,” dated August 15, 2021.

Harassment is behavior that is unwelcome or offensive to a reasonable person and
creates conditions that interfere with work performance or creates an intimidating, hostile, or
offensive work environment. Harassment can be oral, visual, written, physical, or electronic.
Prohibited workplace harassment behaviors may include bullying, hazing, non-verbal gestures,
offensive comments or conduct, and intimidating acts.

All individuals within the Federal workplace, including Federal employees, contractors,
students, interns, and military personnel, are protected from harassment. Individuals who believe
they have been subject to harassment or retaliation, or have witnessed harassing or retaliatory
conduct, should immediately report the matter to the supervisor of the employee engaging in the
misconduct (if known), their own supervisor, or to the Anti-Harassment Program Manager in the
TM Directorate.

Managers and supervisors must play an active role to ensure our work environment is free
from harassment. Upon becoming aware that an employee is being harassed, managers and
supervisors will take prompt, appropriate action to stop the harassment and will immediately
report all allegations of harassment to DSCA's TM Directorate. Please join me in ensuring
DSCA is a workplace free of harassment.

fo a. Buulk
James A. Hursch

Director
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sizeler Property Investors, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Sidney W. Lassen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                      /S/ SIDNEY W. LASSEN
                                      ------------------------------------
                                      Sidney W. Lassen
                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                      March 28, 2003
February 12, 2010

BY EMAIL AND OVERNIGHT DELIVERY

Honorable Lisa P. Jackson

Administrator

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1101A)

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW 

Washington, D.C. 20460

Re: Petition for Reconsideration and Administrative Stay

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for

Chemical Manufacturing Area Sources; Final Rule

Dear Administrator Jackson:

Enclosed is a Petition for Reconsideration and Administrative Stay regarding the 

above‐captioned final rule (the “CMAS Rule”), published at 74 Fed. Reg. 56008 (Oct. 

29, 2009) and to be codified at 40 C.F.R. Part 63, Subpart VVVVVV.  This petition is 

respectfully submitted by the Society of Chemical Manufacturers & Affiliates 

(SOCMA) and the American Chemistry Council (ACC).

As the Petition explains, the CMAS Rule requires republication in the Federal 

Register because it contains a variety of requirements that were not described in, 

nor a logical outgrowth of, the proposed rule.  Such a notice would also enable EPA 

to collect comments on several approaches that would greatly reduce the burdens of 

the final rule.

The Petition also requests EPA to issue an administrative stay of the CMAS Rule’s 

requirements for ninety days.  Because two of the problematic aspects of the rule, if 

altered or reinterpreted, would change the number and configurations of chemical 

manufacturing process units subject to the rule, such a stay could save the owners 

and operators of many facilities from having to file two initial notifications, one on 

February 26 and another after the relevant issues have been resolved.

SOCMA and ACC have filed a protective petition for review of the CMAS Rule in the 

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit (American Chemistry Council v. EPA, No. 09‐

1324, filed December 23, 2009).  EPA, SOCMA and ACC then filed a joint motion to 

hold the case in abeyance while EPA considered the issues to be raised in this 

petition.  The court granted that motion on January 26.  Under the court’s order, 

EPA’s first status report is due on May 26.  SOCMA and ACC are confident and 

hopeful that we can resolve the issues discussed below by that date.
Honorable Lisa P. Jackson

February 12, 2010

Page 2

Thank you for your consideration of this petition.  The undersigned counsel look 

forward to discussing it with your staff.

Sincerely,

/s/

_________________________________ _________________________________

James W. Conrad, Jr. Leslie A. Hulse

Conrad Law & Policy Counsel American Chemistry Council

1615 L Street, N.W., Suite 1350 1300 Wilson Blvd.

Washington, DC 20036 Arlington, VA 22209

202‐822‐1970 703‐741‐5165

jamie@conradcounsel.com leslie_hulse@americanchemistry.com

Counsel for SOCMA Counsel for ACC

Encls.

ccs (w/ encls): M. Mia

R. McDonald

P. Versace

L. Bedig
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF STEVENS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND FOR THE NINE  MONTHS THEN
ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                              11
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      533
<ALLOWANCES>                                        92
<INVENTORY>                                      4,865
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,623
<PP&E>                                           9,381
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,766
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,733
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,563
<BONDS>                                          8,645
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           950
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,057)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,733
<SALES>                                          3,049
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,049
<CGS>                                            3,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,377
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    65
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,625
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,018)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,018)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,018)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.42)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1
 Certification of
Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer
of VCA Antech, Inc.
   (i)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
  /s/ Robert L. AntinRobert L. AntinChief Executive Officer/s/ Tomas W. FullerTomas W. FullerChief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Altwan L. HOLLOWAY, a.k.a. Altuan Holloway, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-11335 Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(November 27, 2017)

*914Germaine Seider, U.S. Attorney Service — Middle District of Florida, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Altwan L. Holloway, Pro Se

Before HULL, WILSON and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas H. Dale, appointed counsel for Altwan L. Holloway in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Holloway’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
#### COM. v. JOHNSON, T.

1720 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/11/2017

CP-51-CR-0001076-2015 (Philadelphia)

Affirmed
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CPS Technologies Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three month and nine-month periods ended September 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Grant C. Bennett, President and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:	November 13, 2007
/s/	Grant C. Bennett
Grant C. Bennett
President and Treasurer
No. 11-1462.

#### Roberts *v.*Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Co.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF STEVENS INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                         SEP-30-1996
<S>                                                  <C>
<CASH>                                                       221
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              22320
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 879
<INVENTORY>                                                25535
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           61598
<PP&E>                                                     56794
<DEPRECIATION>                                             26431
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            105335
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      34346
<BONDS>                                                    30457
<COMMON>                                                     945
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                                 35907
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              105335
<SALES>                                                    54115
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           54115
<CGS>                                                      49314
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              49314
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          2919
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (14106)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               (5213)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (8893)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              (0.94)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              (0.94)
        

</TABLE>
Supreme Court of the United States

Office ofthe Clerk

Washington, DC 20543-0001

Scott S. Harris

Clerk of the Court

April 20, 2015 (202)479-3011

Clerk

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

P.O. Box 12308

Capitol Station

Austin, TX 78711

Re: Cecil Ray Garcia

v. Texas

No. 14-9369

(Your No. WR-61,850-03)

Dear Clerk:

The petition for a writ of certiorari in the above entitled case was filed on

November 25, 2014 and placed on the docket April 20, 2015 as No. 14-9369.

Sincerely,

Scott S. Harris, Clerk

by

Clayton Higgins

Case Analyst

RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

APR 23 2015

Abel Acosta, Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 82 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 82

To repeal the Department of Agriculture bioenergy subsidy programs and 
                    other related subsidy programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2019

  Mr. Biggs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
    Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committees on 
Oversight and Reform, and Science, Space, and Technology, for a period 
    to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the Department of Agriculture bioenergy subsidy programs and 
                    other related subsidy programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Farewell to Unnecessary Energy 
Lifelines Reform Act of 2019'' or the ``FUEL Reform Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE BIOENERGY SUBSIDY PROGRAMS 
              AND OTHER RELATED SUBSIDY PROGRAMS.

    Title IX of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (7 
U.S.C. 8101 et seq.) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-1258.

#### Kivisto *v.*Soifer et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Exhibit 10.1

 

FOURTH AMENDMENT TO
 AAR CORP. SUPPLEMENTAL KEY EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT PLAN

 

(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2005)

 

WHEREAS, AAR CORP., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), maintains the AAR CORP. Supplemental Key Employee Retirement Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2005 (the “Plan”); and

 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 7.1, the Company has reserved the right to amend the Plan and now deems it appropriate to do so.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, Section 4.9(b) of the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of January 1, 2012, to read as follows:

 

“(b)                           Distribution Due to Death.      Each Participant shall have a right to designate, by giving a written designation to the Committee, a beneficiary or beneficiaries to receive any amount remaining to be distributed to such Participant in the event that he dies before distribution of the full amount of his Supplemental Accounts.  Successive beneficiary designations may be made, and the last designation received by the Committee prior to the death of the Participant shall be effective and shall revoke all prior designations.  If a designated beneficiary shall die before the Participant, his interest shall terminate and, unless otherwise provided in the Participant’s designation, such interest shall be paid in equal shares to those beneficiaries, if any, who survive the Participant.  If a Participant has not designated a beneficiary, or if no designated beneficiary is living on the date of distribution hereunder, amounts distributable pursuant to this paragraph shall be distributed to those persons or entities entitled to receive distributions of the Participant’s accounts under the Qualified Profit Sharing Plan.”

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Fourth Amendment to be executed on its behalf, by its officers, duly authorized, on this 26 day of April 2013.

 

	
 
    	
AAR   CORP.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Timothy O. Skelly
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Timothy   O Skelly, Vice President
EX-10.15



 Exhibit 10.15 

THIRD AMENDMENT 
 TO

 MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT 

THIS THIRD AMENDMENT to the MASTER SERVICE
AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is effective as of January 29, 2014 (“Amendment Effective Date”), by and among EVOKE PHARMA, INC.
(“Client”) and SYNTERACTHCR, INC. (“SynteractHCR”). 
 RECITALS 

WHEREAS, Client and SynteractHCR, Inc. (formally known as Synteract, Inc.) entered into a Master Services
Agreement dated January 30, 2009 and subsequent Amendments, dated January 30, 2011 and November 25, 2013 (collectively the “Agreement”); and 

WHEREAS, Client and SynteractHCR wish to amend the terms of the Agreement as set forth below. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows: 

 

	1.	Section 5(a), entitled Term, will be deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following: 


“This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date hereof (January 30, 2009) and shall continue until January 30, 2017, unless and
until terminated in accordance with this Section 5”. 
  

	2.	Except as expressly provided in this Amendment, all other terms, conditions and provisions of the Agreement shall apply and remain in full force and effect. 


 

	3.	Each individual signing for a corporate entity hereby personally warrants his or her legal authority to bind that entity. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is executed as of the Amendment Effective Date 

 

									
	EVOKE PHARMA, INC.	  		 	SYNTERACTHCR, INC.
					
	By:	 	 /s/ David A. Gonyer
	  		 	By:	 	 /s/ Stewart Bieler

		 	Name: David A. Gonyer	  		 		 	Name: Stewart Bieler
		 	Title: President and CEO	  		 		 	Title: President, US
			
	Date: January 29, 2014	  		 	Date: January 29, 2014
No. 11-9394.

#### Scarborough *v.*Chase Home Finance, LLC.

Super. Ct. Pa. Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*[566 U. S. 1008] denied.

Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
REGISTRANT'S  FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       2,213,386
<SECURITIES>                                   300,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,627,541
<ALLOWANCES>                                    65,718
<INVENTORY>                                  1,001,879
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,170,793
<PP&E>                                       2,332,662
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,891,860
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,611,596
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,480,265
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       379,185
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,941,751
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,611,596
<SALES>                                      2,513,393
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,513,393
<CGS>                                        1,493,186
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,493,186
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               357,625
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                (2,181)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,515
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                305,368
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            299,768
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   299,768
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01


</TABLE>
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00089

- CV

IN RE STEPHAN J. SUL LIVAN AND

MAJEL E. SULLIVAN RELATOR S

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------

Th e court has considered relators’ p etition for writ of mandamus and is of

the opinion that relief should be den ied. Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, J.; DAUPHINOT and GABRIEL, JJ.

DELIVERED: March 24, 2014

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8 (d).