alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8320 

To require the Secretary of Labor to establish apprenticeships or expanding 

opportunities through apprenticeships for outlying areas, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2020 

Mr. SABLAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Labor to establish apprenticeships or expanding opportunities through apprenticeships 

for outlying areas, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Outlying Area Appren5 ticeship Expansion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. OUTLYING AREA APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAMS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Labor shall 

8 make grants, cooperative agreements, contracts, and other 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8320 IH

1 arrangements available to the outlying areas for the pur2 poses of— 

3 (1) establishing registered apprenticeships 

4 under the Act of August 16, 1937 (commonly known 

5 as the ‘‘National Apprenticeship Act’’; 50 Stat. 664, 

6 chapter 663; 29 U.S.C. 50 et seq.); or 

7 (2) expanding opportunities through apprentice8 ships only registered under the Act of August 16, 

9 1937 (commonly known as the ‘‘National Appren10 ticeship Act’’; 50 Stat. 664, chapter 663; 29 U.S.C. 

11 50 et seq.). 

12 (b) FUNDING.—Of the amount appropriated under 

13 subsection (d), the Secretary of Labor shall divide the 

14 amount for each fiscal year equally among the outlying 

15 areas. 

16 (c) OUTLYING AREA DEFINED.—The term ‘‘outlying 

17 area’’ means American Samoa, Guam, the Commonwealth 

18 of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the United States 

19 Virgin Islands. 

20 (d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

21 are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this sec22 tion— 

23 (1) $1,786,000 for fiscal year 2021; 

24 (2) $2,024,000 for fiscal year 2022; 

25 (3) $2,262,000 for fiscal year 2023; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8320 IH

1 (4) $2,500,000 for fiscal year 2024; and 

2 (5) $2,738,000 for fiscal year 2025. 

3 (e) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act shall take effect be4 ginning on July 1, 2021. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
No. 11-1481.

#### Nicholas *v.*AllianceOne Receivables Management, Inc.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 131

JOINT RESOLUTION

Waiving certain enrollment requirements for the reyear 1999. general or continuing appropriations for fiscal with respect to any bill or joint resolution making mainder of the One Hundred Fifth Congress
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 131

JOINT RESOLUTION

Waiving certain enrollment requirements for the remainder

of the One Hundred Fifth Congress with respect to

any bill or joint resolution making general or continuing

appropriations for fiscal year 1999.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HJ 131 EH

1 That the provisions of sections 106 and 107 of title 1,

2 United States Code, are waived for the remainder of the

3 One Hundred Fifth Congress with respect to the printing

4 (on parchment or otherwise) of the enrollment of any bill

5 or joint resolution making general appropriations or con6 tinuing appropriations for the fiscal year ending Septem7 ber 30, 1999. The enrollment of any such bill or joint reso8 lution shall be in such form as the Committee on House

9 Oversight of the House of Representatives certifies to be

10 a true enrollment.

Passed the House of Representatives October 8,

1998.

Attest:

Clerk.
August 8, 2016

Mr. Perry Gilland

Perry Gilland

152 Reid Street

Roopville, GA 30170

Re: FAA–2016–3513

Dear Mr. Gilland:

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and 

have determined that we will continue to process your petition. 

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov, we 

are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently-issued regulation, 

Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 107 (www.faa.gov/uas) will satisfy your request. We have determined that 

your request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your 

petition for exemption. 

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will 

publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments, if we have 

not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov. 

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst
For DCN SE0595 2 , see reference DCN SE05 905 ( Memorandum to the Steam Electric Rulemaking Record:

Steam Electric Effluent Guidelines Nonwater Quality Environmental Impacts for NSPS/PSNS

- DCN SE05905 ).
### NUMBER 13 - 1 9 - 00 074 - C V 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN R E AT&T INC., ET AL.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.


## ORDER
Before Justices Benavides, Longoria , and Hinojosa Order Per Curiam Relators, AT&T Inc.; New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility, individually and in its capacity as General Partner of McAllen

- Edinburg

- Mission SMSA Limited Partnership, Texas RSA 18 Limited Partnership, and Texas RSA 19 Limited Partnership; AT&T Mobility Corporation; Cricket Communications, LLC; and Cricket Wireless, LLC, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on February 15, 2019. Through this original proceeding, relators seek to compel the trial court to vacate and set aside an order compelling the production of privileged documents. As an initial matter, however, relators seek abatement of this original proceeding pursuant to Texas2 R ule of Appellate Procedure 7.2(b). See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 7.2(b). Relators argue that the
resp ondent in this original proceeding, the Honorable Juan Partida, no longer presides over the 275th District Court, and this matter should be abated pending consideration of the issues herein by his successor, the Honorable Marla Cuellar. Under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 7.2 , w hen a judge who is a party to an original proceeding ceases to hold office, the court must abate the proceeding to allow the successor to reconsider the original party ’ s decision. See i d. R. 7.2(b) ; In re Blevins , 480 S.W.3d 542 , 543

– 44 (Tex. 2013) (orig. proceeding); In re Schmitz , 285 S.W.3d 451, 454 (Tex. 2009) (orig. proceeding) ; In re Baylor Med. Ctr. at Garland , 280 S.W.3d 227, 228 (Tex. 2008) (orig. proceeding); see also State v. Olsen , 360 S.W.2d 402, 403 (Tex. 1962) ( “ A writ of mandamus will not lie against a successor judge in the absence of a refusal by him to grant the relief Relator seeks. ” ). Accordingly, w e grant the request for abatement, and we abate and remand this matter to the trial court to afford the successor judge the opportunity to consider the rulings at issue in this original proceeding. The successor judge shall issue notice and cause a hearing to be held on the se matters

. We direct the successor judge to determine wh at ruling should issue , and to rende r its own order accordingly. The successor judge shall cause its order on reconsideration and any findings and conclusions, along with a reporter ’ s record of any hearings held, to be filed with the C lerk of this Court within thirty days

. IT IS SO ORDERED. PER CURIAM
D elivered and filed the 19th day of February , 201 9

.
H. R. 829 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1450 Montauk 

Highway in Mastic, New York, as the ‘‘Army Specialist Thomas J. Wilwerth 

Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ARMY SPECIALIST THOMAS J. WILWERTH POST OFFICE 

BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 1450 Montauk Highway in Mastic, New York, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Army Specialist Thomas 

J. Wilwerth Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Army Specialist Thomas J. Wilwerth Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 133

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the

fiscal year 1999, and for other purposes.
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 133

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

1999, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 106(c) of Public Law 105–240 is amended
2

•HJ 133 EH

1 by striking ‘‘October 9, 1998’’ and inserting in lieu thereof

2 ‘‘October 12, 1998’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 9,

1998.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 Certification of
Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer
of VCA Antech, Inc.
 
  (i)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
 (ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
  /s/ Robert L. AntinRobert L. AntinChief Executive Officer/s/ Tomas W. FullerTomas W. FullerChief Financial Officer
 40
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 66 (Wednesday, April 6, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 19939]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07240]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Clinical Laboratory Improvement Advisory Committee (CLIAC); 
Notice of Charter Renewal

AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice of charter renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 
October 6, 1972, that the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Advisory 
Committee (CLIAC), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 
Department of Health and Human Services, has been renewed for a 2-year 
period through February 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reynolds M. Salerno, Ph.D., Designated 
Federal Officer, Clinical Laboratory Improvement Advisory Committee 
(CLIAC), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road 
NE, Mailstop V24-3, Atlanta, Georgia 30329-4027, Telephone: (404) 498-
6516; Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fdafae9c91988f9392bd9e999ed39a928b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0e5c5d6f626b7c60614e6d6a6d20696178">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the 
Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 
has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices 
pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and 
the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Kalwant Smagh,
Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief 
Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2022-07240 Filed 4-5-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
  We hereby consent to the use in the Prospectus constituting part of this
Registration Statement on Form S-4 of GeoStrat Resources, Inc. of our report
dated February 10, 1997, except as to Note 14 which is as of March 31, 1997,
relating to the financial statements of TGX Corporation, which appears in such
Prospectus. We also consent to the references to us under the headings
"Experts" and "Selected Consolidated Financial Information" in such
Prospectus. However, it should be noted that Price Waterhouse LLP has not
prepared or certified such "Selected Consolidated Financial Information".
 
Price Waterhouse LLP
 
Houston, Texas
   
May 7, 1997
No. 11-9384.

#### Smith *v.*Tennessee.

Sup. Ct. Tenn. Certio-rari denied.
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lufkin Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I R.D.
Leslie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
(S)1350, as adopted pursuant to (S)906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (3)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

     (4)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

/s/   R.D. Leslie
-----------------------
R.D. Leslie
Chief Financial Officer

August 9, 2002

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. (S)1350, and not
for any other purpose.
| (logo) **ncb**  National Cooperative Bank    | 2011 Crystal Drive  Suite, 8oo  Arlington, VA 22202 |
|---------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 February6, 2019

 

WellsFargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. as Depositor

Attn:AJ Sfarra

375Park Avenue, 2nd Floor

J0127-023

NewYork, NY 10152

 

RE:        Annual Statement as to Compliance

              WFCM 2014 LC18

 

DearSir/Madam:

 

Inaccordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement entered into in connectionwith the issuance of the Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2014-LC18, as an authorized officer of National Cooperative Bank, N.A.,formerly NCB, FSB (the “NCB Master Servicer”), I hereby certify pursuant toSection 11.12 thereof that:

 

a.       Areview of the activities of the NCB Master Servicer during the precedingcalendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the Poolingand Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

b.       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on these reviews, the NCB Master Servicer hasfulfilled all obligations under this agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

Pleasenote that the annual financial statement will be sent under separate cover onor before March 31, 2019.

 

 

Bestregards,

 

/s/Karyn Mann

KarynMann

SeniorVice President, Investor Compliance

NationalCooperative Bank, N.A.
No. 11-9870.

#### Blackman *v.*Indiana.

Sup. Ct. Ind. Certio-rari denied.
No. 12-5946.

#### Bates *v.*Lockett, Warden.

C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin*v. *District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U. S. 1 (1992) *(per*curiam).
<PAGE>
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                   -----------------------------------------


     We consent to the use of our report dated September 25, 1996 in the Annual
Report (Form 10-KSB) of Omni U.S.A., Inc.



                                   HARPER & PEARSON COMPANY



Houston, Texas
October 15, 1996
#### Sylvester COWAN Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-3288

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Filed February 27, 2018

Ermel R. Luckett, Jr., Law Office, Columbus, OH, for Petitioner-Appellant

Mary B. Young, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Columbus, OH, for Respondent-Ap-pellee

BEFORE: BOGGS, BATCHELDER, and THAPAR, Circuit Judges.

ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.

Sylvester Cowan appeals the district court’s dismissal of his collateral attack on his 2003 sentence for federal bank-robbery offenses. The sentencing court arrived at Cowan’s sentence after finding that both Cowan’s four instant offenses and at least two prior offenses qualified as “crimes of violence.” Cowan was adjudged a career offender under the career-offender provision of the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines. After having served nearly fourteen years of his sentence, Cowan challenges his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on the grounds that the Supreme Court’s decision in *Johnson v. United States,*— U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015) renders his current sentence unlawful and entitles him to re-sentencing.

As a threshold matter, 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f) requires that collateral attacks be timely. To satisfy this requirement, Co-wan must have filed his claim within one year, running from, as relevant here, “the date on which the right asserted was initially recognized by the Supreme Court, if that right has been newly recognized by the Supreme Court and made retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review.” 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)(3).

Cowan filed his claim on June 9, 2016— within one year of the Supreme Court’s decision in *Johnson.*His motion for relief, however, remains untimely under § 2255(f)(3) because this circuit has explicitly held that *Johnson*did not recognize a right that applies to Cowan’s situation — a sentence under the *pre-Booker*Sentencing Guidelines. In *Raybon v. United States,*867 F.3d 625 (6th Cir. 2017), we held that a *Johnson-based*collateral attack of a pre-*Booker*sentence was untimely “because the Supreme Court has not decided whether the residual clause of the mandatory Sentencing Guidelines is unconstitutionally vague.” *Id.*at 630-31 (citation and alteration omitted).

Cowan acknowledges *Raybon*but argues that it was wrongly decided. Whatever merits Cowan’s argument may have, it cannot prevail before this panel because “only the en banc process, a material inter*568vening Supreme Court decision, or a relevant change to the Guidelines permits us to override binding circuit precedent.” *United States v. Verwiebe,*874 F.3d 258, 262 (6th Cir. 2017). None of these bases for deviating from binding circuit precedent is available here. *See e.g., Gipson v. United States,*710 Fed.Appx. 697, 698 (6th Cir. 2018).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
<PAGE>   1
                                     EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                         MARCH 31,
                                                  1998              1997
                                               ----------        ----------
<S>                                            <C>               <C>
Net loss                                       (1,799,146)       (1,333,608)

Preferred stock dividends                         (10,732)               --
                                               ----------        ----------

Net loss applicable to common shares           (1,809,878)       (1,333,608)
                                               ==========        ==========

Weighted average common stock outstanding      22,339,773        19,151,200

Common equivalent shares representing
  shares issuable upon exercise of stock
  options                                       5,061,275         8,377,133

Add back of common equivalent shares
  due to antidilutive shares                   (5,061,275)       (8,377,133)
                                               ----------        ----------

Dilutive adjusted weighted average
  shares                                       22,339,773        19,151,200
                                               ==========        ==========

Basic net (loss) per share                          (0.08)            (0.07)

Diluted net (loss) per share                        (0.08)            (0.07)
</TABLE>

The following securities were not included in the diluted earnings per share
because to do so would have been antidilutive for the periods presented.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                         MARCH 31,
                                                  1998              1997
                                               ----------        ----------
<S>                                            <C>               <C>
Options                                         2,440,723         6,147,364
Warrants                                               --           300,000
Convertible debt                                       --         1,929,769
Convertible preferred stock                     2,620,552                --
                                               ----------        ----------
                                                5,061,275         8,377,133
                                               ==========        ==========
</TABLE>

Under the treasury stock method, the assumed net proceeds from the exercise of
the weighted average number of common stock equivalents outstanding during the
period are assumed to be used to repurchase common stock at its average market
price during the period such repurchase of common stock reduces the dilutive
effect of the common stock equivalents.
#### Stephen R. BARD, Appellant, v. Bonnie BARD, Respondent.

No. ED 104806

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

FILED: December 19, 2017

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Richard J. Eisen, Margaret Arianne Boudrea, Co-Counsel, 7733 Forsyth Blvd., Suite 325, Clayton, MO 63105, GROWE, EISEN, KARLEN, EILERTS, L.L.C.

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Maia Brodie, Sarah Joy Galloway, Co-Counsel, 222 South Central Avenue, Suite 708, Clayton, MO 63105, KEEFE & BRO-DIE.

Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Stephen R. Bard appeals from the Amended Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage dissolving his marriage to Bonnie Bard. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).