alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio , Texas

July 8, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00418

- CR

Antrail Jadaveonte LE MUNERLYN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR3931W Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presidin g



### O R D E R

Defendant pled nolo contendre to unauthorized use of a vehicle and was sentenced within the terms of a plea bargain. Defendant timely filed a general notice of appeal. The trial court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal states this “is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendan t has NO right of appeal

. ” See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by defendant; therefore, the trial court’ s certification accurately reflects that defendant’s case is a plea bargain case and defendant does not have a right of appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2).

“In a plea bargain case . . . a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court's permission to appeal.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record does not contain a written motion ruled on before trial nor does it indicate the trial court granted defendant permission to appeal. This court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made a part of the record.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(d).

It is therefore ORDERED this appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d), unless an amended trial court certification that shows defendant has the right of appeal has been made part of the appellate record by August 7, 2016

. See Daniels v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174 ( Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, order); T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d); 37.1.All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending our resolution of the certification

issue.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 8th day of July, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-1003 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2012-NM-064-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
No. 11-1526.

#### Rockefeller *v.*Chu, Secretary of Energy, et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 129 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 129

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
                  protect the rights of crime victims.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 16, 1998

Mr. Paul introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
                  protect the rights of crime victims.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the following article is 
proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, 
which shall be valid for all intents and purposes as part of the 
Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the 
several States within 7 years from the date of its submission by the 
Congress:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Each victim of a crime of violence shall have the 
rights--
            ``(1) to reasonable notice of, and not to be excluded from, 
        all public proceedings relating to the crime--
            ``(2) to be heard, if present, and to submit a statement, 
        at all public proceedings to determine a release from custody, 
        an acceptance of a negotiated plea, or a sentence;
            ``(3) to the foregoing rights at a parole proceeding that 
        is not public, to the extent those rights are afforded to the 
        convicted offender;
            ``(4) to reasonable notice of a release or escape from 
        custody relating to the crime;
            ``(5) to consideration for the interest of the victim in a 
        trial free from unreasonable delay;
            ``(6) to an order of restitution from the convicted 
        offender;
            ``(7) to consideration for the safety of the victim in 
        determining any release from custody; and
            ``(8) to reasonable notice of the rights established by 
        this article.
    ``Section 2. Only the victim or the victim's representative shall 
have standing to assert the rights established by this article.
    ``Section 3. Congress shall have power to implement and enforce 
this article by appropriate legislation.
    ``Section 4. The rights established by this article shall apply to 
all proceedings that begin on or after the 180th day after the 
ratification of this article.
    ``Section 5. The rights established by this article shall apply in 
all Federal proceedings, including military proceedings to the extent 
that Congress may provide by law, juvenile justice proceedings, and 
proceedings in any district or territory of the United States not 
within a State.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-9746.

#### Michael *v.*Wetzel, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES—OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Annual Report of Yuengling’s Ice Cream Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31,
2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert C. Bohorad, Chief
Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to
my knowledge:



(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated.



Date: March 15,
2022



|By: | /s/ Robert
    C. Bohorad                 
|--- | ------------------------------------------
|    | Robert C. Bohorad, Chief Executive Officer
|    | (Principal Executive)
No. 11-1363.

#### Hoyt, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Allen, et al. *v.*Cooks et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Acupuncture Healthcare Plaza I, P.C. as Assignee of Bernard Absolv, Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>Truck Insurance Exchange, Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Reginald A. Boddie, J.), entered May 1, 2013. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, arguing that it had properly used the workers' compensation fee schedule applicable to chiropractors who render the same services as acupuncturists to reimburse plaintiff for the acupuncture services plaintiff had rendered. The Civil Court granted defendant's motion.</p><p>Contrary to plaintiff's contention, raised in the Civil Court and on appeal, defendant established that the denial of claim form at issue had been timely mailed (<a href="../2008/2008_04072.htm" target="_blank"><i>see St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v Government Empls. Ins. Co.</i>, 50 AD3d 1123</a> [2008]). Defendant further demonstrated that it had fully paid plaintiff for the services at issue in accordance with the workers' compensation fee schedule for acupuncture services performed by chiropractors (<a href="../2009/2009_29467.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Great Wall Acupuncture, P.C. v Geico Ins. Co.</i>, 26 Misc 3d 23</a> [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2009]). Consequently, defendant established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law.</p><p>Accordingly, the order is affirmed.</p><p>Pesce, P.J., Aliotta and Elliot, JJ., concur.</p><br>Decision Date: March 11, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>     0000817125
<NAME>     Affiliated Resources Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>     1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                        1363
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  790
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              2153
<PP&E>                                      105743
<DEPRECIATION>                               11623
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              166687
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      1504746
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     87139
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                166687
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              4475670
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (1042)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (4476712)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                            (7198602)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                             (11675314)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (0.55)


</TABLE>
No. 11-8677.

#### Lee *v.*Wetzel, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGEACT OF 1934,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Greta Guggenheim, certify that: 

 
1.
I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 of TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.; and 

 
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 

Date: April 29, 2020 

 

/s/ Greta Guggenheim
Greta GuggenheimChief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer)**
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      The undersigned hereby certify that the Form 10-Q of Windswept
Environmental Group, Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2006, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Windswept Environmental Group, Inc. for the periods presented.


                                        /s/ Michael O'Reilly
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: Michael O'Reilly
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
                                        (principal executive officer)

Date: November 20, 2006


                                        /s/ Arthur Wasserspring
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: Arthur Wasserspring
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        (principal financial officer)

Date: November 20, 2006
EXHIBIT 35.1








ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC








The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2014 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") among CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2014-4, as Issuer (the "Issuer"), CarMax Auto Funding LLC, as Depositor, and CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer (the "Servicer"), does hereby certify that:





|   |                                                                                                              
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.




|   |                                                                                      
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate.




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|3. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning onMarch 1, 2016and ending onFebruary 28, 2017and of the Servicer's performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made under my supervision.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.







Capitalized terms used in this certificate and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Sale and Servicing Agreement.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Servicer, has duly executed this Officer's Certificate this 19th day of May, 2017 .





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC





/s/ Enrique Mayor-Mora


Enrique Mayor-Mora


Vice President and Treasurer
#### THMED LLC v. ADVANCED URGENT CARE

624 EDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/19/2017

2015-31947 (Montgomery)

Appeal Dismissed
Exhibit 35.1



Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services,
Inc.



This Annual Statement as to Compliance
is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 3, 2014 (the “Agreement”)
and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust
2014-4 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution
and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp.
in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.



The undersigned certifies
that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as
follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to
be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2018 through December
31, 2018, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations
under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any
such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. |                                                                            
|------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                     |                                                                            
|By:                                  | /s/ Connie Coffey                                                          
|                                     | Connie Coffey                                                              
|                                     | Executive Vice President, Corporate
Controller and Chief Accounting
Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.4

                                Certification of
                             Chief Financial Officer
                        of Mission Resources Corporation

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K/A
(the "Form 10-K/A") for the period ended December 31, 2002 of Mission Resources
Corporation (the "Issuer").

I, Richard W. Piacenti, the Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that:

     (i)  the Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

     (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Issuer.

Dated:  April 4, 2003                       /s/ Richard W. Piacenti
                                            ------------------------------------



Subscribed and sworn to before me
this 4th day of April 2003



/s/    Carmen M. Garcia
---------------------------------------


Notary Public in and for the
State of Texas

My commission expires:







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Mission Resources Corporation and will be retained by Mission
Resources Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                                Certification of
                             Chief Executive Officer
                        of Mission Resources Corporation

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q
(the "Form 10-Q") for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 of Mission Resources
Corporation (the "Issuer").

I, Robert L. Cavnar, the Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer, certify that to
the best of my knowledge:

     (i)  the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)
          or 78o(d)); and

     (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Issuer.

Dated:  August 14, 2002.                           /s/ Robert Cavnar
                                                   ---------------------------
                                                   Robert L. Cavnar

Subscribed and sworn to before me
this 14th day of August, 2002

/s/ Sandy Fisher
----------------------------------------
Sandy K. Fisher
Notary Public in and for the
State of Texas

My commission expires:  July 30, 2004