alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 38 40 42 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/17 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●


## ★ ● ● ● ●
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8533 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8533

   To provide an exception to the volume cap requirement for private 
   activity bonds used to finance the preservation, improvement, or 
  replacement of certain federally-assisted buildings, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 6, 2020

    Ms. Clark of Massachusetts (for herself, Mr. Marchant, and Mr. 
  Cisneros) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide an exception to the volume cap requirement for private 
   activity bonds used to finance the preservation, improvement, or 
  replacement of certain federally-assisted buildings, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Support Allowing Volume Exception 
for Federally-Assisted Housing Act'' or the ``SAVE Federally-Assisted 
Housing Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCEPTION TO VOLUME CAP REQUIREMENT FOR CERTAIN PRIVATE 
              ACTIVITY BONDS.

    (a) In General.--Section 146(g) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended in paragraph (3) by striking ``and'', in paragraph (4) 
by striking the period at the end and inserting ``, and'', and by 
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(5) any bond to finance the preservation, improvement, or 
        replacement of a Federally-assisted building (as such term is 
        described in section 42(d)(6)(C)(i), provided that for purposes 
        of this paragraph, the substantial assistance requirement under 
        such section will be considered met with respect to any 
        building with more than 20 percent of units assisted or more 
        than 20 percent of the eligible basis funded under one or more 
        of the housing programs covered therein).''.
    (b) Low-Income Housing Credit.--Section 42(h)(4)(A)(i) of such Code 
is amended by adding after ``section 146'' ``or is described in section 
146(g)(5)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to bonds issued after the date of the enactment of this section.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-9833.

#### Thomas *v.*Ritz Condominium Assn., Inc.

Super. Ct. N. J., App. Div. Certiorari denied.
#### COM. v. HUERTAS, D.

1915 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/19/2017

CP-39-CR-0001251-2015 (Lehigh)

Affirmed
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-598

In Re: TERRY O'CONNOR PAGE,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 12, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry O'Connor Page, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Terry O'Connor Page filed a petition for a writ of mandamus

seeking an order compelling a United States Magistrate Judge to

apply what Page deems the proper law when considering claims of

ineffective assistance of counsel raised by state prisoners. We

deny the petition.

Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary

circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402

(1976). Mandamus relief is only available when there are no other

means by which the relief sought could be granted, In re Beard, 811

F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987), and may not be used as a substitute

for appeal. In re United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir.

1979). The party seeking mandamus relief carries the heavy burden

of showing that he has "no other adequate means to attain the

relief he desires" and that his right to such relief is "clear and

indisputable." Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 35

(1980). Page has not made such a showing. Accordingly, we deny his

petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### Enver KARAFILI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jimmy CRUZEN, Correctional Sergeant; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-16038

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed December 20, 2017

Enver Karafili, Pro Se

Chad Allen Stegeman, Esquire, Attorney, California Department of Justice, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees

Before; WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Enver Karafili appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action related to congregational prayer. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Williams v. Paramo,*775 F.3d 1182, 1191 (9th Cir. 2015). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Karafili failed to *885raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether he properly exhausted his administrative remedies, or whether there was “something in his particular case that made the existing and generally available administrative remedies effectively unavailable to him.” *Albino v. Baca,*747 F.3d 1162, 1172 (9th Cir. 2014) (en banc); *see also Woodford v. Ngo,*548 U.S. 81, 90, 126 S.Ct. 2378, 165 L.Ed.2d 368 (2006) (requiring proper exhaustion, which means “using all steps that the agency holds out, and doing so properly (so that the agency addresses the issues on the merits)” (emphasis, citation, and internal quotation marks omitted)). Karafili contends that he exhausted under a “continuing violation” theory, but even if this court were to adopt such a theory, it would not apply in this case.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8529 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8529

 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to prohibit additional 
 rebates under the Medicaid program for certain noninnovator multiple 
                             source drugs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 6, 2020

 Mr. Butterfield (for himself, Mr. Long, and Mr. Cardenas) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to prohibit additional 
 rebates under the Medicaid program for certain noninnovator multiple 
                             source drugs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Access to Affordable 
Medicines Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ADDITIONAL REBATE UNDER MEDICAID FOR CERTAIN 
              NONINNOVATOR MULTIPLE SOURCE DRUGS.

    Section 1927(c)(3)(C) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r-
8(c)(3)(C)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (i), by striking ``The amount'' and inserting 
        ``Subject to clause (v), the amount''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new clause:
                            ``(v) Prohibition on additional rebate for 
                        certain noninnovator multiple source drugs.--
                        With respect to a rebate period beginning on or 
                        after January 1, 2021, and a dosage form and 
                        strength of a covered outpatient drug described 
                        in clause (i), the amount of the rebate 
                        specified in subparagraph (A) for such dosage 
                        form and strength for such rebate period may 
                        not be increased if the average manufacturer 
                        price for a unit of such dosage form and 
                        strength for such rebate period is less than 
                        $1.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

                     STEVENS INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                  COMPUTATIONS OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
                                     (UNAUDITED)
                    (Amounts in thousands, except per share data)



                                          Three Months Ended  Nine Months Ended
                                             September 30,      September 30,
                                             2000     1999      2000      1999
                                           -------   ------   -------   -------
 <S>                                       <C>       <C>      <C>       <C>
 Basic and diluted:

 Weighted average shares
   outstanding - basic                       9,502     9,492    9,502     9,492
 Assumed exercise of Series A and B
  stock options (Treasury stock method         ---       ---      ---       ---
 Assumed exercise of warrants                  ---       ---      ---       ---

 Total common share equivalents - diluted    9,502     9,492    9,502     9,492

    Net (loss)                             $  (364)  $  (994) $(4,018)  $ ( 946)
                                           =======   =======  =======   =======
 Earnings (loss) per share - basic
  (Note 8)                                 $ (0.04)  $ (0.10) $ (0.42)  $ (0.10)
                                           =======   =======  =======   =======

 Earnings (loss) per share - diluted
  (Note 8)                                 $ (0.04)  $ (0.10) $ (0.42)  $ (0.10)
                                           =======   =======  =======   =======


     See notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


                                December 30, 2002

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)


                            CITIZENS HOLDING COMPANY
           (Exact name of the registrant as specified in its charter)


 MISSISSIPPI                    001-15375                      64-0666512
(State or other           (Commission File Number)           (IRS Employer
jurisdiction of                                            Identification No.)
incorporation)


   521 Main Street, Philadelphia, Mississippi                       39350
   (Address of principal executive office)                       (Zip Code)


                                 (601) 656-4692
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


<PAGE>


Item 7. Financial Statement and Exhibits.

(a) Exhibits

     Exhibit 99.1   Press Release dated December 30, 2002

Item 9. Regulation FD Disclosure.

On December 30, 2002, Citizens Holding Company (the "Company") issued a press
release that announced the change in Chief Executive Officer upon the retirement
of Steve Webb. The press release announcing this change is attached as
Exhibit 99.1.

<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                    CITIZENS HOLDING COMPANY


                                    BY: /s/ Robert T. Smith
                                       --------------------------------------
                                       Robert T. Smith
                                       Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer)


DATE:  December 30, 2002


<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
Number              Description
-------            ------------
99.1     Press Release dated December 30, 2002
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sizeler Property Investors, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert A. Whelan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                                     /s/ Robert A. Whelan
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Robert A. Whelan
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     November 12, 2002
H. J. Res. 36

One Hundred Fifth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-seven

Joint Resolution

Approving the Presidential finding that the limitation on obligations imposed by

section 518A(a) of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related

Programs Appropriations Act, 1997, is having a negative impact on the proper

functioning of the population planning program.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That the House

of Representatives and Senate approve the Presidential finding,

submitted to the Congress on January 31, 1997, that the limitation

on obligations imposed by section 518A(a) of the Foreign Operations,

Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 1997,

is having a negative impact on the proper functioning of the population planning program.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

GS Mortgage SecuritiesCorporation II 

200 West Street

New York, New York 10282

 

 

Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-GC28

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of February 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer'sknowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY UNAUDITED FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
NOVEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           7,293
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,369
<ALLOWANCES>                                       168
<INVENTORY>                                      2,934
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,062
<PP&E>                                          20,887
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,544
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,520
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,765
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,407
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,520
<SALES>                                         14,857
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,970
<CGS>                                            6,605
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,394
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   9
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,692
<INCOME-TAX>                                        18
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,674
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,674
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 41 (Monday, March 3, 1997)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 9349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5308]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 41 / Monday, March 3, 1997 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 9349]]

                Order of February 26, 1997

                
Designation Under Executive Order 12958

                Pursuant to the provisions of section 1.4 of Executive 
                Order 12958 of April 17, 1995, entitled ``Classified 
                National Security Information,'' I hereby designate the 
                following additional official to classify information 
                originally as ``Top Secret'':

                    The Chair, President's Commission on Critical 
                Infrastructure Protection.

                The Chair of the President's Commission on Critical 
                Infrastructure Protection, established under Executive 
                Order 13010 of July 15, 1996, shall exercise the 
                authority to classify information originally as ``Top 
                Secret'' during the existence of the Commission.

                Any delegation of this authority shall be in accordance 
                with section 1.4(c) of Executive Order 12958.

                This order shall be published in the Federal Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    February 26, 1997.

[FR Doc. 97-5308
Filed 2-28-97; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 2, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51590 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ALEJANDRO MENA-FLORES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-1018-ALL

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Alejandro MenaFlores raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                 STEVENS INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
              COMPUTATIONS OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
                                  (UNAUDITED)
                 (AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
  
                                                     THREE MONTHS ENDED   SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                          JUNE 30,            JUNE 30,
                                                       1996     1997       1996       1997
                                                     -------  -------    -------   -------
<S>                                                 <C>        <C>        <C>        <C> 
PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED:
 
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING................    9,451      9,451      9,451      9,451
ASSUMED EXERCISE OF SERIES A AND B STOCK OPTIONS
  (TREASURY STOCK METHOD)..........................       --         --         --        --
                                                     -------    -------    -------     ------
TOTAL COMMON SHARE EQUIVALENTS.....................    9,451      9,451      9,451      9,451
                                                     =======    =======    =======     ======

NET INCOME (LOSS)..................................  $(3,741)   $(3,405)   $(4,826)   $(6,404)
                                                     =======    =======    =======     ======

PER SHARE AMOUNTS  -- PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED:

NET INCOME (LOSS)..................................  $ (0.40)   $ (0.36)   $ (0.51)   $ (0.68)
                                                     =======    =======    =======     ======
</TABLE> 
                                     -17-
No. 11-10013.

#### Retanan *v.*Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.