In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 12-381V

Filed: May 8, 2013

************************************* NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

FREDDIE GRIGSBY, *

*

* Special Master Zane

*

* Stipulation; attorneys’ fees and costs

 Petitioner, * 

 *

v. *

 *

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

 *

 Respondent. *

*

*************************************

Randall G. Knutson, Farrish Johnson Law Office, Mankato, MN, for Petitioner;

Ryan Daniel Pyles, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1

On May 7, 2013, the parties in the above-captioned case filed a Stipulation of Attorneys’ 

Fees and Costs (“Stipulation”) memorializing their agreement as to the appropriate amount of 

attorneys’ fees and costs in this case. Petitioner requests an award of $11,326.25 in attorneys’ 

fees and $820.68 in costs for a total of $12,146.93, to which Respondent does not object. 

Petitioner’s counsel represents that Petitioner incurred no personal litigation costs. In 

1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the Special Master’s action in this 

case, the Special Master intends to post it on the website of the United States Court of Federal 

Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 113 Stat. 2899, 

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). All decisions of the Special Master will be made available to the public 

unless they contain trade secret or commercial or financial information that is privileged and 

confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would clearly be an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision or designated substantive order is filed, 

a party has 14 days to identify and to move to redact such information before the document’s 

disclosure. If the Special Master, upon review of a timely motion to redact, agrees that the 

identified material fits within the categories listed above, the Special Master shall redact such 

material from public access. 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4); Vaccine Rule 18(b).

 
accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e), the undersigned awards the amount to which 

Respondent does not object.

Petitioner, Freddie Grigsby, alleged that he suffered from neuropsychiatric impairment 

and fibromyalgia as a consequence of his receipt of the Hepatitis A vaccine, which is a vaccine 

contained in the Vaccine Injury Table, 42 C.F.R § 100.3(a), and which he received on or about 

June 30, 2009. Petitioner alleged that he experienced the residual effects of this injury for more 

than six months. Petitioner also represented that there have been no prior awards or settlement 

of a civil action for these damages. Petitioner also alleged that the residual effects of this injury 

for more than six months and that he has not otherwise received compensation for such injuries. 

A decision awarding compensation based upon the parties’ stipulation was entered on April 4, 

2013.

Although Respondent did not concede the claim, the parties, nonetheless, settled the 

matter, and an award of compensation was made. Because Petitioner has been awarded 

compensation, Petitioner is entitled to an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 

U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e). The undersigned also finds that the stipulated amount of $11,326.25, in 

attorneys’ fees and $820.68 in costs for a total of $12,146.93, is reasonable based on the stage at 

which this matter was settled. Based on the request’s reasonableness and pursuant to Vaccine 

Rule 13, the undersigned GRANTS the parties’ request as outlined in the Stipulation. The 

judgment shall reflect that Petitioner is awarded attorneys’ fees and costs as follows:

in a check made payable jointly to Petitioner (Freddie Grigsby) and Petitioner’s 

counsel (Randall G. Knutson of the law firm Farrish Johnson Law Office, Mankato, 

MN), the amount of $12,146.93, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e).

The court thanks the parties for their cooperative efforts in resolving this matter. In the 

absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, the Clerk is directed to 

enter judgment accordingly.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Daria Zane

Daria J. Zane

Special Master 

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each party filing 

a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge.

2