alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 65 (Tuesday, April 5, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 19736]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07117]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer 
Communications Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Taxpayer 
Communications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This 
meeting will still be held via teleconference. Due to a delay in the 
approval process and a late start with our initial meetings, we are 
getting a late start to the TAP year. Because of this we will not be 
able to meet the 15 calendar-day notice requirement. We anticipate all 
future Federal Register notices to be timely moving forward. This 
meeting will be held via teleconference.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, April 13, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Conchata Holloway at 1-888-912-1227 or 
214-413-6550.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Communications 
Project Committee will be held Wednesday, April 13, 2022, at 12:00 p.m. 
Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure 
of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with 
Conchata Holloway. For more information please contact Conchata 
Holloway at 1-888-912-1227 or 214-413-6550, or write TAP Office, 1114 
Commerce St., MC 1005, Dallas, TX 75242 or contact us at the website: 
http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: March 31, 2022.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2022-07117 Filed 4-4-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### COM. v. DUODU, W.

1047 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/12/2017

CP-14-CR-0001298-2015

(Centre)

Affirmed
No. 11M121.

#### Under Seal *v.*Under Seal et al.

Motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted.
BRACEWELL 

&GIULIANI 

Mr. Mike Wilson, P.E. 

Director 

Air Pennits Division 

July 29,2013 

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality 

P.O. Box 13087 

Austin, TX 78711-3087 

Texas 

New York 

Washington, DC 

Connecticut 

Seattle 

0ub411 

London 

John A. Riley 

Partner 

512.542.2108 Office 

800.404.3970 Fax 

John.RiJey@bgllp.com 

BraceweQ & Giuliani LLP 

111 Congress Avenue 

Suite 2300 

Austin, Texas 

78701-4061 

By E-mail and U.S. First Class Mail 

Re: Las Brisas Energy Center LLC, CN603358771 

Las Brisas Energy Center, RNI05520779 

State Air Quality Pennit No. 85013, Hazardous Air Pollutant Major Source 

Permit No. HAP48, and Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit No. 

PSD-TX-I138 

Dear Mr. Wilson: 

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality ("TCEQ") issued the abovereferenced permits to Las Brisas Energy Center LLC ("Las Brisas"). For a number of reasons, 

Las Brisas has detennined that plans to go forward with construction of the Las Brisas Energy 

Center are no longer viable. Consequently, Las Brisas respectfully requests that the TCEQ void 

the above-referenced permits. 

If you have any questions or require additional infonnation, please do not hesitate to 

contact me at (512) 542-2108. 

( John A. Riley 

Attorney for Las Bris 

c: Booker Harrison, Senior Air Attorney [by E-mail) 

/1 4343302.1 

ergy Center LLC 

EXHIBIT 

J
April 7, 2016

Mr. Dean M. Drew

Partner

Drew & Drew LLP

159 Linwood Avenue 

Buffalo, NY 14209

Dear Mr. Drew:

We have received your March 28, 2016, email correspondence on behalf of Wings Flights of 

Hope, Inc. withdrawing its December 8, 2015, petition for an exemption from § 61.113(c) of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

Your letter has been placed in the public docket (No. FAA-2012-0516). No further action will 

be taken on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

James M. Crotty

Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 133 Received in Senate (RDS)]







105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 133

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1999, and 
                          for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

              October 9 (legislative day, October 2), 1998

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1999, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That section 106(c) of Public 
Law 105-240 is amended 
by striking ``October 9, 1998'' and inserting in lieu thereof ``October 
12, 1998''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 9, 1998.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.`
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 131 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                             H. J. RES. 131

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 Waiving certain enrollment requirements for the remainder of the One 
  Hundred Fifth Congress with respect to any bill or joint resolution 
   making general or continuing appropriations for fiscal year 1999.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 131

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Waiving certain enrollment requirements for the remainder of the One 
  Hundred Fifth Congress with respect to any bill or joint resolution 
   making general or continuing appropriations for fiscal year 1999.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the provisions of 
sections 106 and 107 of title 1, United States Code, are waived for the 
remainder of the One Hundred Fifth Congress with respect to the 
printing (on parchment or otherwise) of the enrollment of any bill or 
joint resolution making general appropriations or continuing 
appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1999. The 
enrollment of any such bill or joint resolution shall be in such form 
as the Committee on House Oversight of the House of Representatives 
certifies to be a true enrollment.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 8, 1998.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Luis RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-10450 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 20, 2018

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Jose Luis Ramirez, Pro Se

Before REAVLEY, CLEMENT, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Luis Ramirez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ramirez has not filed a response and has completed his term of imprisonment. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, *see*5th Cir. R. 42.2, and in part as moot, *see United States v. Heredia-Holguin,*823 F.3d 337, 340 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc).

*

**Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juan CALZADA-CUELLAR, also known as Juan Calzada-Esperanza, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-10540 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 20, 2018

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S, Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Juan Calzada-Cuellar, Pro Se

Before REAVLEY, CLEMENT, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Calzada-Cuellar has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Calza-da-Cuellar has not filed a response. Although Calzada-Cuellar remains subject to a term of supervised release, he has completed the term of imprisonment. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, *see*5th Cir. R. 42.2, and in part as moot, *see United States v. Heredia-Holguin,*823 F.3d 337, 340 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc).

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         894,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,846,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   129,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     266,437,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              27,024,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             279,537,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                    114,856,000
<COMMON>                                        89,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  97,645,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               279,537,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            31,890,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,182,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          10,733,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,008,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and Publications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. Due to a delay in the approval process and a late start with our initial meetings, we are getting a late start to the TAP year. Because of this we will not be able to meet the 15 calendar-day notice requirement. We anticipate all future                         **Federal Register**                         notices to be timely moving forward. This meeting will be held via teleconference.                    

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, April 12, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Fred Smith at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 317-3087.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and Publications Project Committee will be held Tuesday, April 12, 2022, at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with Fred Smith. For more information, please contact Fred Smith at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 317-3087, or write TAP Office,                           ( print page 20518)                        1111 Constitution Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

Dated: April 1, 2022.

Kevin Brown,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2022-07329 Filed 4-6-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996             SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          31,496                  31,496
<SECURITIES>                                    83,376                  83,376
<RECEIVABLES>                                   98,098                  98,098
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               296,040                 296,040
<PP&E>                                         489,664                 489,664
<DEPRECIATION>                                 163,731                 163,731
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,095,839               1,095,839
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          126,979                 126,979
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           623                     623
<OTHER-SE>                                     776,513                 776,513
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,095,839               1,095,839
<SALES>                                        147,338                 433,081
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               147,338                 433,081
<CGS>                                          127,466                 388,623
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  135,869                 413,946
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,122                  47,222
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,859                  11,887
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,263                  35,335
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,263                  35,335
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.33                    0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33                    0.62
        

</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-1306

___________________________

Todd McDonald

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Brett Carpenter, Lieutenant, Saline County Detention Center (SCDC) (Originally

named as Carpenter); Tonya Parker, Sergeant, SCDC (Originally named as Parker)

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

Waite, Officer, SCDC; Dick, Officer, SCDC; Balding, Corporal, SCDC

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock

 ____________

 Submitted: August 20, 2019

 Filed: August 27, 2019

[Unpublished]

____________

Before COLLOTON, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, inmate Todd McDonald appeals the district

court’s adverse grant of summary judgment. Based on the record before the court, 1

we agree that McDonald failed to show he exhausted administrative remedies on the

claims raised in the instant action. See Townsend v. Murphy, 898 F.3d 780, 783-84

(8th Cir. 2018) (reviewing de novo grant ofsummary judgment; boundaries of proper

exhaustion are determined by prison’s specific administrative requirements). The

judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________

The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the

1

Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the

Honorable Patricia S. Harris, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District

of Arkansas.

-2-
No. 11-9836.

#### Glisson *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
NUMBER 13-19-00074-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE AT&T INC., ET AL.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Hinojosa

Order Per Curiam

Relators, AT&T Inc.; New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility, 

individually and in its capacity as General Partner of McAllen-Edinburg-Mission SMSA 

Limited Partnership, Texas RSA 18 Limited Partnership, and Texas RSA 19 Limited 

Partnership; AT&T Mobility Corporation; Cricket Communications, LLC; and Cricket 

Wireless, LLC, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on February 15, 

2019. Through this original proceeding, relators seek to compel the trial court to vacate 

and set aside an order compelling the production of privileged documents. As an initial 

matter, however, relators seek abatement of this original proceeding pursuant to Texas 
2

Rule of Appellate Procedure 7.2(b). See TEX. R. APP. P. 7.2(b). Relators argue that the 

respondent in this original proceeding, the Honorable Juan Partida, no longer presides 

over the 275th District Court, and this matter should be abated pending consideration of 

the issues herein by his successor, the Honorable Marla Cuellar.

Under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 7.2, when a judge who is a party to an 

original proceeding ceases to hold office, the court must abate the proceeding to allow 

the successor to reconsider the original party’s decision. See id. R. 7.2(b); In re Blevins, 

480 S.W.3d 542, 543–44 (Tex. 2013) (orig. proceeding); In re Schmitz, 285 S.W.3d 451, 

454 (Tex. 2009) (orig. proceeding); In re Baylor Med. Ctr. at Garland, 280 S.W.3d 227, 

228 (Tex. 2008) (orig. proceeding); see also State v. Olsen, 360 S.W.2d 402, 403 (Tex. 

1962) (“A writ of mandamus will not lie against a successor judge in the absence of a 

refusal by him to grant the relief Relator seeks.”).

Accordingly, we grant the request for abatement, and we abate and remand this 

matter to the trial court to afford the successor judge the opportunity to consider the 

rulings at issue in this original proceeding. The successor judge shall issue notice and 

cause a hearing to be held on these matters. We direct the successor judge to determine 

what ruling should issue, and to render its own order accordingly. The successor judge 

shall cause its order on reconsideration and any findings and conclusions, along with a 

reporter’s record of any hearings held, to be filed with the Clerk of this Court within thirty 

days. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

19th day of February, 2019.
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                    ------------

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Brian Alleman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Simtek Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June
30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Simtek Corporation.



/s/ Brian Alleman
--------------------------------
Brian Alleman
Chief Financial Officer

August 11, 2006