alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.22

                              SECOND AMENDMENT TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



     THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this "Second Amendment") is
made and entered into as of December 4, 1996, by and between FLORES & RUCKS,
INC., a Delaware corporation ("Company"), and ("Employee").

                                   BACKGROUND

     A.  The Company and Employee are parties to an Employment Agreement dated
as of September 1, 1995, as amended by that certain First Amendment to
Employment Agreement dated as of May 8, 1996 (as amended, the "Agreement").

     B.  The Company and Employee wish to amend the Agreement as hereinafter set
forth.

                                   AGREEMENT

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and other good and
valuable consideration, the full receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

     1.  Amendment to Definition of "Corporate Change."  Subsection (v) of the
last full paragraph of Subsection 7(e) of the Agreement is hereby deleted and
restated as follows:

     "(v) James C. Flores, the 1996 Flores Family Limited Partnership, the 1996
     James Flores Children Trust, the 1996 Cherie Flores Children Trust, William
     W. Rucks, IV, the 1996 Rucks Family Limited Partnership, the 1996 William
     Rucks Children Trust, and the 1996 Catherine Rucks Children Trust,
     collectively, own less than 20% of the Company's outstanding common stock,
     or . . ."

     2.   Agreement to Remain in Effect.  Except to the extent amended by this
Second Amendment, all of the terms, provisions, conditions, agreements,
covenants, representations, warranties and powers contained in the Agreement
shall be and remain in full force and effect and the same are hereby ratified
and confirmed.  In the event of any inconsistency or conflict between this
Second Amendment and the Agreement, the terms, provisions and conditions of this
Second Amendment shall govern and control.

     3.   Governing Law.  This Second Amendment shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with the internal laws of the State of Louisiana.
<PAGE>
 
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Second Amendment
to Employment Agreement as of the day and year first above written.

                              EMPLOYER:
                              FLORES & RUCKS, INC.


                              By: /s/ Milton J. Womack
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                              Printed Name: Milton J. Womack
                                           -------------------------------------
                              Title:  Chairman of the Compensation Committee


                              EMPLOYEE:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Gundle/SLT Environmental, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 (the "Report"),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I Roger
J. Klatt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     2.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     3.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

/S/ Roger J. Klatt
------------------
Roger J. Klatt
Chief Financial Officer

Date    February 27, 2003
        -----------------
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 68 (Friday, April 8, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 20814]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07475]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security


Information Systems Technical Advisory Committee; Notice of 
Partially Closed Meeting

    The Information Systems Technical Advisory Committee (ISTAC) will 
meet on April 27 and 28, 2022, at 1:00 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time. The 
meetings will be available via teleconference. The Committee advises 
the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration on 
technical questions that affect the level of export controls applicable 
to information systems equipment and technology.

Wednesday, April 27

Open Session

1. Welcome and Introductions
2. Working Group Reports
3. Old Business

Thursday, April 28

Closed Session

4. Discussion of matters determined to be exempt from the provisions 
relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. App. 2 Sec. Sec.  
10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3).

    The open session will be accessible via teleconference. To join the 
conference, submit inquiries to Ms. Yvette Springer at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#58012e3d2c2c3d760b282a31363f3d2a183a312b763c373b763f372e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3e67485b4a4a5b106d4e4c5750595b4c7e5c574d105a515d10595148">[email protected]</span></a>, no later than April 20, 2022.
    To the extent time permits, members of the public may present oral 
statements to the Committee.
    The public may submit written statements at any time before or 
after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of public 
presentation materials to Committee members, the Committee suggests 
that public presentation materials or comments be forwarded before the 
meeting to Ms. Springer.
    The Assistant Secretary for Administration, with the concurrence of 
the delegate of the General Counsel, formally determined on January 7, 
2022, pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 
as amended (5 U.S.C. App. 2 Sec.  (10)(d))), that the portion of the 
meeting concerning trade secrets and commercial or financial 
information deemed privileged or confidential as described in 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(4) and the portion of the meeting concerning matters the 
disclosure of which would be likely to frustrate significantly 
implementation of an agency action as described in 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(9)(B) shall be exempt from the provisions relating to public 
meetings found in 5 U.S.C. App. 2 Sec. Sec.  10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). The 
remaining portions of the meeting will be open to the public.
    For more information, contact Yvette Springer via email.

Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-07475 Filed 4-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JT-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-0245

_____________________________

PAUL SINKFIELD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

J. Scott Duncan, Judge.

October 30, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
No. 11-10399.

#### Green *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER JACKSON CARTER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 178 MM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29th day of January , 201 9

, the Petition for Leave to File Petition

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
curm_ex108.htm


EXHIBIT 10.8


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO


PLACEMENT AGENCY AGREEMENT


 


This First Amendment to the Placement Agency Agreement (“Amendment”) is entered into as of the 31st day of January 2014, by and between CÜR Media, Inc. f/k/a Duane Street Corp. (“Company”) and Gottbetter Capital Markets, LLC (“Placement Agent”) and amends the Placement Agency Agreement dated December 30, 2013 (the “Agreement”).


 


The parties to the Agreement hereby amend and restate in its entirety Paragraph 5 of the Agreement to read as follows:


 


The Offering will be offered until the earlier of the time that the Maximum Amount plus any discretionary over-allotment are sold or until April 14, 2014 (the “Offering Period”).


 


This Amendment is hereby made part of and incorporated into the Agreement, with all the terms and conditions of the Agreement remaining in full force and effect, except to the extent modified hereby.


 


This Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which may be executed by less than all of the parties and shall be deemed to be an original instrument which shall be enforceable against the parties actually executing such counterparts and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. The exchange of copies of this Amendment and of signature pages by facsimile transmission or in pdf format shall constitute effective execution and delivery of this Amendment as to the parties and may be used in lieu of the original Amendment for all purposes. Signatures of the parties transmitted by facsimile or in pdf format shall be deemed to be their original signatures for all purposes.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed and delivered by the parties below effective as of the date first set forth above.


 


 




	 	CÜR MEDIA, INC.	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	
By: 

	/s/ Thomas Brophy	 
	 	Name:	Thomas Brophy	 
	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	GOTTBETTER CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	

By: 

	/s/ Julio A. Marquez 	 
	 	Name:	Julio A. Marquez	 
	 	Title:	President
Exhibit 35.3

OFFICERS CERTIFICATE

I, Karen Montbach, a
Managing Director of Citibank, N.A. (the Company), hereby certify, with respect to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of February 1, 2015 (the Agreement), by and among Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities
Inc., as depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association, as special servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as operating advisor, Citibank, N.A., as
certificate administrator (the Certificate Administrator), and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, the following:

1. A review of the Companys activities as Certificate Administrator during the reporting period ending December 31, 2015 and its
performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, as of and for
the reporting period ending December 31, 2015, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

This statement is given by the undersigned as an authorized officer of the Company and not in the undersigneds individual capacity.

Date: February 26, 2016



Citibank, N.A.By:

/s/ Karen MontbachName:

Karen MontbachTitle:

Managing Director


CGCMT 2015-GC27
No. 11-9906.

#### Caraveo *v.*Texas.

Ct. App. Tex., 11th Dist. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 13.2**

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Videocond2h Limited (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

(i) the accompanying annual report onForm 20-F/A of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2015 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company. 

Date: February 5, 2016 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, and is not being “filed” either as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement, and is not to be incorporated by reference into the Report or any other filing of the Company, whether made before or after thedate hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. The foregoing certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subjectto the liabilities of Section 18 or Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
----

| ☒ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|---------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Wyoming                                                        |   | 80-0873491                           |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |   | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |

| Title of Each Class exchange on which registered |   | Name of each |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------|
| None                                             |   | N/A          |

----

----

| Large accelerated filer                       | ☐ | Accelerated filer         | ☐ |
|-----------------------------------------------|---------|---------------------------|---------|
| Non-accelerated filer                         | ☐ | Smaller reporting company | ☒ |
| (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |    |

----

| By:  /s/ Robert Finigan                          |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Robert Finigan                                        |   |
| Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |   |
|                                                  |   |
| Date:  May 25, 2018                              |   |

| By:  /s/ Robert Finigan                                                           |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Robert Finigan                                                                         |   |
| Chief Executive Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |   |
|                                                                                   |   |
| Date:  May 25, 2018                                                               |   |

| Signatures            |   | Title(s)                           |   | Date                     |
|-----------------------|--------|------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|                  |   |                               |   |                     |
| /s/ Robert Finigan    |   | Chairman of the Board of Directors |   | Date: May 25, 2018       |
| Robert Finigan        |   |                               |   |                     |
|                  |   |                               |   |                     |
| /s/ Maurice Durschlag |   | Director                           |   | Date:  May 25, 2018 |
| Maurice Durschlag     |   |                               |   |                     |

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

CARL LARUE GODFREY, a.k.a. Carl

Godfrey, a.k.a. Carl Laurue Godfrey,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-50534

D.C. No. 8:09-cr-00060-JVS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 19, 2013** 

Before: CANBY, TROTT and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Carl Larue Godfrey appeals from district court’s judgment and challenges

the 70-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for aiding and

abetting mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 1341. We dismiss.

FILED

NOV 26 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Godfrey contends that the district court procedurally erred at sentencing by

failing to hold a hearing on a disputed issue regarding the calculation of his

criminal history category. The government argues that the appeal is barred by a

valid appeal waiver. We review de novo whether a defendant has waived his right

to appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 981 (9th Cir. 2009).

Godfrey contends that the appeal waiver does not apply because the district

court failed to calculate properly his criminal history and the government breached

the agreement because it failed to recommend a sentence at the bottom of the

applicable Guidelines range. The plain language of the appeal waiver

unambiguously encompasses the district court’s determination of Godfrey’s

criminal history category. See United States v. Harris, 628 F.3d 1203, 1206-07

(9th Cir. 2011). Further, the government did not breach the plea agreement

because it recommended a sentence at the bottom of the correctly calculated

Guidelines range. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal in light of the valid appeal

waiver. See id. at 988.

DISMISSED.

2 11-50534
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jordan Jericho BAUTISTA-GUNTER, also known as Jordan Jericho Bautista Gunter, also known as Jordan Bautista, Gunter, also known as Jordan Bautista, also known as Jordan Gunter, also known as Forrest Gunter, also known as Jordan J. Burghard Gunter, also known as Forrest Jordan Gunter, also known as Jordan J. Burghard, also known as Jordan Forrest Gunter, also known as Jordan Jordan Burghard Gunter, also known as Forrest J. Gunter, also known as Forrest Jordan Burghard Gunter, Defendant-Appellant

*637No. 17-50084 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 2, 2018

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, Mark Randolph Stelmach,. Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Judy Fulmer Madewell, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Maureen Scott Franco, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant .

Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jordan Jericho Bautista-Gunter appeals his guilty plea convictions for possession of a firearm by a prohibited person and carrying a weapon on an aircraft. He argues that the district court erred by denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea because the Government breached its promise, contained in his plea agreement, that it would not oppose his receipt of a U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 adjustment for acceptance of responsibility.

We need not decide whether the Government breached the plea agreement because it cured any breach by making sufficiently clear, both in its amended sentencing memorandum and during Bau-tista-Gunter’s sentencing hearing, its intention to remain silent regarding whether Bautista-Gunter should receive the § 3E1.1 adjustment. *See United States v. Purser,*747 F.3d 284, 293-94 (5th Cir. 2014). Although the Government referred during the sentencing hearing to the position expressed in its original sentencing memorandum, the Government’s expressions of its intention to remain silent in accordance with the plea agreement were not “equivocal or half-hearted.” *Id.*at 293 n.44.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R, 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
2022 EAVS Data Brief: Montana EAVS Jurisdictions:

56 

 Voter Registration 

Active Reg. Voters as of Nov. 8, 20221 

661,320 

Reg. Forms Received2* 

237,013 

Total Confirmation Notices Sent3* 

91,182 

Voters Removed from Reg. Rolls4* 

60,248 

Source of Registration Applications5 

Motor Vehicle Dept. 39.3% 

In Person 23.2% 

Mail, Email, Fax 21.9% 

Other 15.7% 

Online 0.0% 

Voting and Turnout 

Voters Participating By Mode6 

Note: Montana was unable to report 

data on voter participation by mode 

in the 2022 EAVS. 

Turnout7: 54.6% 

Total Voting Locations8: 409 

Total Poll Workers9: 3,906 

 Election Technology 

Percentage of Jurisdictions Using...10

100.0% 

Ballot 

Marking 

Devices 

82.1% 

Scanners 

17.9% 

Hand 

Counting 

0.0% 

DREs w/o 

VVPAT 

0.0% 

DREs with 

VVPAT 

0.0% 

Electronic 

Poll 

Books 

 Mail Ballots 

• 505,618 mail ballots transmitted11 

• 74.6% of transmitted mail ballots returned by voters12 

• 99.4% of returned mail ballots counted13 

• 0.6% of returned mail ballots rejected14 

• Did not conduct all-mail election15 

• Allowed drop boxes16 

• Allowed ballot curing17 

 Election Audits18 

-- Access audit 

-- Ballot design audit

Ballot reconciliation -- audit 

Compliance/ -- procedural audit 

-- Eligibility audit 

-- Legal audit 

Logic and accuracy ✔ testing 

Post-election ✔ tabulation audit 

-- Other 

* 

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at www.eac.gov 

/research-and-data/datasets-codebooks-and-surveys. 

Responses of “Does not apply,” “Data not available,” and “Valid 

skip” are shown as zeroes or dashes. Percentages may not sum 

to 100% because of missing data or rounding. 

Close of registration for 2020 

general election to close of 

registration for 2022 general 

election. 

1 A1b of EAVS. 

2 A3a of EAVS. 

3 A8a of EAVS. 

4 A9a of EAVS. 

5 Mail, Email, Fax is A4a/A3a. 

In Person is A4b/A3a. Online is 

A4c/A3a. Motor Vehicle Dept. is 

A4d/A3a. Other is the sum of 

A4e–A4l/A3a. May not sum to 

100% because of missing data. 

6 In-Person Election Day is F1b. 

Mail is F1d+F1g. In-Person Early 

is F1f. Other is F1c+F1e+F1h. 

7 F1a of EAVS divided by citizen 

voting age population (CVAP). 

8 D2a of EAVS. 

9 D7a of EAVS. 

10 F3a–f, F5a–F9a of EAVS; 

number of jurisdictions that 

responded “Yes” divided by

number of jurisdictions in 

state/territory. 

11 C1a of EAVS. 

12 C1b/C1a of EAVS. 

13 C8a/C1b of EAVS. 

14 C9a/C1b of EAVS. 

15 Q17 and Q17a of Policy 

Survey. 

16 Q19 of Policy Survey. 

17 Q20 of Policy Survey. 

18 Q36 of Policy Survey. See 

survey questionnaire for full 

definitions of each type of 

audit.