alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
  THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
  COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
  ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         9190
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,246
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         350,553
<DEPRECIATION>                                 84,174
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 336,873
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        287,902
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       8
<OTHER-SE>                                     17,589
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   336,873
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               48,995
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  30,759
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             14,703
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,296)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,147)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,149)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,149)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (6.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (6.44)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned officers, who are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Easterly Government Properties, Inc. (the Company),
each hereby certifies to the best of his or her knowledge, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K (the Report) to which this certification is attached, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                      |  |                                                     
|------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ William C. Trimble, III           |  | /s/ Alison M. Bernard                               
|William C. Trimble, III               |  | Alison M. Bernard                                   
|Chief Executive Officer and President |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                                      | 
|March 30, 2015                        |  | March 30, 2015
H. Con. Res. 136 Agreed to July 31, 1997

One Hundred Fifth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-seven

Concurrent Resolution

Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That, in consonance with section 132(a) of the Legislative

Reorganization Act of 1946, when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Friday, August 1, 1997 or Saturday, August 2, 1997,

pursuant to a motion made by the Majority Leader or his designee,

it stand adjourned until noon on Wednesday, September 3, 1997,

or until noon on the second day after Members are notified to

reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution,

whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses or

adjourns at the close of business on Thursday, July 31, 1997,

Friday, August 1, 1997, or Saturday, August 2, 1997, pursuant

to a motion made by the Majority Leader or his designee in accordance with this concurrent resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned

until noon on Tuesday, September 2, 1997, or until such time

on that day as may be specified by the Majority Leader or his

designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on

the second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant

to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.

SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader

of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority

Leader of the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall

notify the Members of the House and Senate, respectively, to
H. Con. Res. 136—2

reassemble whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall

warrant it.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
f8k021014ex10iii_starstream.htm



Exhibit 10.3


 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  








 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 



 








 


 


 



 



	 	 
	COMPANY:	STARSTREAM ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
	 	 	 
	 	
By: 

	/s/ Kim Leadford
	 	 	Name: Kim Leadford
	 	 	Title:  CEO
	 	 	 
	SSE:	STARSTREAM ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
	 	 	 
	 	
By: 

	/s/ Charles Bonan
	 	 	Name : Charles Bonan
	 	 	Title Manager
	 	 	 
	SECURED PARTY	 	/s/ Timothy Nye
	 	 	Timonty Nye
	 	 	 
	 	 	 





 


 






11
Manuel



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

Tuesday, April 28, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00237

- CR

The STATE of Texas,

Appellant

v.

Manuel CARDENAS

, Appellee

From t he County Court at Law No. 15, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 428298

, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The State of Texas’s motion for stay is granted. See T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN

. 44.01(e). We order proceedings in the trial court stayed pending the dis position of this appeal.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 28th day of April, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 12

- 00489

- CR

Jonathan Paul FINCHER a/k/a Jonathan Fincher,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the Criminal District Court 1, Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1250605D

The Honorable Sharen Wilson, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE MARION , AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED September 25, 2013.

_____________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Trevor Cumberbatch, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Kenneth Burnham and Sonia Burnham, Appellants.</font></b></div><br><br>Kenneth Burnham and Sonia Burnham, appellants pro se.<br><br>The Hinds Law Firm, LLC, respondent pro se (no brief filed).<br><br><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Bruce E. Scheckowitz, J.), dated September 2, 2015. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted landlord's cross motion, in effect, to amend the final judgment to include a monetary award to landlord in the sum of $6,600.</p><p>ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs.</p><p>In this holdover proceeding, tenants agreed in a so-ordered stipulation of settlement that landlord would be granted a final judgment of possession and a warrant would issue, with execution stayed until June 30, 2015, in return for which landlord would waive all arrears and use and occupancy, totalling $6,600, if tenants vacated the premises by June 30, 2015. Upon a default by tenants, landlord could move for a money judgment. Tenants failed to move out by June 30, 2015 and successfully brought several orders to show cause, alleging that they were having difficulty securing a new apartment, and requesting more time to vacate the premises. On tenants' third order to show cause, landlord cross-moved, in effect, to amend the final judgment to include an award for the $6,600 that had been conditionally waived pursuant to the stipulation. Tenants appeal from so much of an order of the Civil Court dated September 2, 2015 as granted landlord's cross motion. </p><p>It is well settled that stipulations of settlement are judicially favored and will not easily be set aside (<i>see Hallock v State of New York</i>, 64 NY2d 224 [1984]; <i>Matter of Frutiger</i>, 29 NY2d 143 [1971]). While stipulations of settlement may be vacated on grounds sufficient to set aside a contract, such as fraud, mistake, collusion or accident (<a href="../2009/2009_03143.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Nash v Yablon-Nash</i>, 61 AD3d 832</a> [2009]), a party should not be relieved from the consequences of a stipulation, particularly one which has been so-ordered by the court, absent a sufficient or compelling showing based on one of these grounds (<i>see Cavalry Portfolio Servs., LLC v Williams</i>, 38 Misc 3d 138[A], 2013 NY Slip Op 50184[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2013]). Here, tenants, who stipulated that, upon a default under the stipulation, landlord would be entitled to a money judgment, have failed to demonstrate the existence of such grounds.</p><p>Accordingly, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed.</p><p>Weston, J.P., Pesce and Aliotta, JJ., concur. </p><br><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br><br>Decision Date: April 07, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-50149

Summary Calendar

__________________

TYRONE FARRIS,

 Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

STATE OF OKLAHOMA,

 Respondent-Appellee.

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-96-CV-37

----------------------

May 31, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Tyrone Farris appeals a district court judgment dismissing

his petition for a writ of habeas corpus construed as being

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 by the district court. He has filed

a motion for a certificate of probable cause (CPC) pursuant to

Fed. R. App. P. 22(b).
No. 96-50149

-2-

Because Farris' petition does not contest the legality of

his conviction or the validity of his initial sentence, his

motion for a CPC to appeal the dismissal of his § 2241 petition

is DENIED AS UNNECESSARY.

Farris addresses the merits of his alleged constitutional

claim arising out of his transfer, but he does not address the

basis of the district court's dismissal for failure to exhaust

state remedies. Failure to identify any error in the district

court's analysis is the same as if the appellant had not appealed

that judgment. Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner,

813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).

Accordingly, Farris' application for a certificate of

probable cause is DENIED AS UNNECESSARY, and the judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

        Date of Report (date of earliest event reported): August 22, 2002

                             Equistar Chemicals, LP
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

           Delaware                   333-76473                  76-0550481
(State or other jurisdiction of      (Commission              (I.R.S. Employer
        incorporation)               File Number)            Identification No.)


                              1221 McKinney Street
                         Suite 700, Houston, Texas 77010
              (Address of principal executive offices and zip code)


        Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 713-652-7200

<PAGE>

Item 9.  Regulation FD Disclosure

On August 22, 2002, Lyondell Chemical Company ("Lyondell") purchased Occidental
Petroleum Corporation's 29.5% interest in Equistar Chemicals, LP ("Equistar").
As a result of the transaction, Lyondell's ownership interest in Equistar
increased to 70.5%. Millennium Chemicals Inc. holds the remaining 29.5% interest
in Equistar. Upon completion of the transaction, Equistar's partnership
governance committee was reduced in size from nine members to six members, with
each owner being represented by three members of the partnership governance
committee.

<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                               Equistar Chemicals, LP

                               By:  /s/ Gerald A. O'Brien
                                   ----------------------------------------
                                   Gerald A. O'Brien
                                   Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Date:  August 22, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    Sep-30-1998
<CASH>                          3,673
<SECURITIES>                      697
<RECEIVABLES>                     103
<ALLOWANCES>                        0
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    0
<PP&E>                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 23,518
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               0
<BONDS>                           719
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<COMMON>                          362
<OTHER-SE>                     21,070
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   23,518
<SALES>                         2,785
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                4,325
<CGS>                             587
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     587
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                1,504
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 39
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 2,195
<INCOME-TAX>                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             2,195
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                    2,195
<EPS-BASIC>                     .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                     .23


</TABLE>
No. 11-1530.

#### Taveras *v.*Rhode Island.

Sup. Ct. R. I. Cer-tiorari denied.
# Επίσημη Εφημερίδα C 114A/28 Μ

| | ISSN 1977-0901 |
| --- | --- |
| Επίσημη Εφημερίδα
  της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | C 114A |
| | |
| Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα | Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες | 61ό έτος28 Μαρτίου 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0901

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα

της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

C 114A

Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα

Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες

61ό έτος28 Μαρτίου 2018

---

| Ανακοίνωση αριθ | Περιεχόμενα | Σελίδα |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Γνωστοποιήσεις |
| | ΔΙΟΙΚΗΤΙΚΕΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΕΣ |
| | Ευρωπαϊκό Κοινοβούλιο |
| 2018/C 114 A/01 | Διαδικασία επιλογής PE/199/S — Έκτακτος υπάλληλος — Εντεταλμένος σύμβουλος διεύθυνσης (AD 5) — Πίνακας επιτυχόντων | 1 |

Ανακοίνωση αριθ

Περιεχόμενα

Σελίδα

V   Γνωστοποιήσεις

ΔΙΟΙΚΗΤΙΚΕΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΕΣ

Ευρωπαϊκό Κοινοβούλιο

2018/C 114 A/01

Διαδικασία επιλογής PE/199/S — Έκτακτος υπάλληλος — Εντεταλμένος σύμβουλος διεύθυνσης (AD 5) — Πίνακας επιτυχόντων

1

---

| EL | |
| --- | --- |

EL

---

V Γνωστοποιήσεις

ΔΙΟΙΚΗΤΙΚΕΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΕΣ

Ευρωπαϊκό Κοινοβούλιο

| 28.3.2018 | EL | Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | CA 114/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2018

EL

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

CA 114/1

---

ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΊΑ ΕΠΙΛΟΓΉΣ PE/199/S

Έκτακτος υπάλληλος — Εντεταλμένος σύμβουλος διεύθυνσης (AD 5)

ΠΊΝΑΚΑΣ ΕΠΙΤΥΧΌΝΤΩΝ

(2018/C 114 A/01)

| 1. | FISCHER, Jessica Isabell |
| --- | --- |

1.

FISCHER, Jessica Isabell

| 2. | LEMAIRE, Cléo |
| --- | --- |

2.

LEMAIRE, Cléo

| 3. | COURTADE, Christelle |
| --- | --- |

3.

COURTADE, Christelle

Η ισχύς του πίνακα επιτυχόντων θα λήξει στις 31 Δεκεμβρίου 2020.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                            3036
<SECURITIES>                                      3976
<RECEIVABLES>                                     5844
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       1363
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 14674
<PP&E>                                            4825
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (3803)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   18062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             8244
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         43743
<OTHER-SE>                                      (35680)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     18062
<SALES>                                           3155
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3681
<CGS>                                             1429
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1774
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  3116
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  73
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1282)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1282)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1282)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)


</TABLE>
#### Rene Orlando ALVARADO MORALES, AKA Rene Alvarado, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 16-72008

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted January 16, 2018 *

Filed January 19, 2018

Alex Galvez, Counsel, Law Office Alex Galvez, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner

Nancy Canter, -Trial Attorney, DOJ— U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: REINHARDT, TROTT, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

*

**The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*481MEMORANDUM **

Rene Orlando Alvarado Morales, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and we review de novo questions of law. *Najmabadi v. Holder,*597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Alvarado Morales’ motion to reopen as untimely, where he did not timely file the motion and failed to demonstrate the due diligence necessary to warrant equitable tolling of the filing deadline. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2); *Avagyan v. Holder,*646 F.3d 672, 679 (9th Cir. 2011) (equitable tolling is available to a petitioner who is prevented from timely filing a motion to reopen due to deception, fraud or error, as long as the petitioner exercises due diligence in discovering such circumstances).

The record does not support Alvarado Morales’ contention that the BIA failed to adequately explain its decision not to reopen sua sponte. *See Najmabadi v. Holder,*597 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir. 2010) (agency need not write an exegesis on every contention); *Fernandez v. Gonzales,*439 F.3d 592, 603 (9th Cir. 2006) (petitioner did not overcome the presumption that the BIA did review the record).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Alvarado Morales’ remaining contentions regarding the BIA’s discretionary decision not to reopen proceedings sua sponte. *See Bonilla v. Lynch,*840 F.3d 575, 588 (9th Cir. 2016) (“[T]his court has jurisdiction to review Board decisions denying *sua sponte*reopening for the limited purpose of reviewing the reasoning behind the decisions for legal or constitutional error.”).

In light of our disposition, we do not reach Alvarado Morales’ remaining contentions regarding the alleged ineffectiveness of prior counsel or compliance with the requirements of *Matter of Lozada,*19 I. & N. Dec, 637 (BIA 1988). *See Simeonov v. Ashcroft,*371 F.3d 532, 538 (9th Cir. 2004) (courts and agencies are not required to decide issues unnecessary to the results they reach).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 32.2  Certification of CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) this Quarterly Report of BF Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company and its results of operations as of and for the periods covered therein.
 
 **BF ENTERPRISES, INC.**Date: May 10, 2004
By:
/s/ S. Douglas PostVice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.