alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 10:00 a.m.

# PLACE: 

                        The meeting will be webcast on the Commission's website at                         *www.sec.gov.*

# STATUS: 

                        The meeting will begin at 10:00 a.m. (ET) and will be open to the public via webcast on the Commission's website at                         *www.sec.gov.*

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 1. The Commission will consider whether to propose rules under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the registration and regulation of security-based swap execution facilities (“SBSEFs”) and related matters. The proposed rules would also address the cross-border application of registration and execution requirements for security-based swaps. Additionally, the Commission will consider whether to propose rules designed to mitigate conflicts of interest at SBSEFs and national securities exchanges that trade security-based swaps.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: March 30, 2022.

Vanessa A. Countryman,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-07068 Filed 3-30-22; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 32

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





         In connection with the quarterly report of The Jones Financial
Companies, L.L.L.P. on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 26, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Steven Novik, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and
                  results of operations of the Company.

                                   /s/ John W. Bachmann
                                   ---------------------------------------
                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                   The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P.
                                   November 7, 2003

                                   /s/ Steven Novik
                                   ---------------------------------------
                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                   The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P.
                                   November 7, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Jones
Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. and will be retained by the Jones Financial
Companies, L.L.L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IWO Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 (the "Report"), I, Jerry E.
Vaughn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Jerry E. Vaughn

--------------------------
Jerry E. Vaughn
Chief Financial Officer
November 11, 2002
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA



### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

JYMAL PIERRE JENKINS

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee.

No. 2D 20 2 3

- 1621

May 24, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinella s County; Joseph A. Bulone

, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Richard P. Albertine, Jr.

, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Jymal P. Jenkins, pro se.

PER CURIAM

.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT , VILLANTI

, and RO THSTEIN

- YOUAKIM , JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior publication.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000814926
<NAME> FREEDOM FUNDING, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1988
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1988
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   625
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     625
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       625
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       62
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (62)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (62)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
|                                      |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                      |  |
| Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas | BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware |
| As Indenture Trustee                 | As Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Michelle H.Y. Voon  | Attn:  Kristine Gullo |
| 100 Plaza One 6th Floor         | 301 Bellevue Parkway 3rd Floor |
| Jersey City, NY 07311                | Wilimingtom, DE  19809 |

|                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |  |
| The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. | Ally Auto Assets LLC |
| Attn:  Robert Castle                  | Ally Financial Inc. |
| 2 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1020              | 200 Renaissance Center |
| Chicago, IL  60602                    | 10th Floor, MC 482-B10-A68 |
|                                            | Detroit, MI |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| Re:    | Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2014-3 |
|   | Annual Statement as to Compliance |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of  January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015, and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been under his supervision, and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
|   | Ally Financial Inc. |
No. 11-1503.

#### Darr *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
COURT OF A PPEAL S EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEX AS ELPASO, TEXAS

I N RE: J OSE MANUEL

BEJARANO,

Relator. § § § § § § No. 08-10-00086- CR

AN ORI GI

NAL PROCEEDI

NG
I N MANDA MUS

MEMORAN DUM OP INION ON P ETIT ION F OR WRIT OF M ANDAM US
J ose Manuel Be

jara no, pro se , has filed a petition for writ of mandamus reque sting this Court to direct the J udg e the 112th Judi cial District Court of Pec os County , Texas to conduct a “ double jeopar dy hear ing,” and to dismiss t he cr iminal case pe nding a g ainst Relator.
I n order to obtain relief throug h a writ of m andamus, a relator must establish: (1) no other adequate re medy

at law is ava ilable and ( 2) that the act he seeks to compel is minist eria l. State ex rel. Y oung v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Appeals At Texarkana , 236 S.W .3d 207, 2 10 (Tex.Cr i m
. App. 2007). An act is minist eria l if it does not involve the ex erc ise of any discretion.
State ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals f or th e F i f t h Di s t r i ct , 34 S.W .3d 924, 927 (Tex.Crim.App. 2001). Ba sed on the petition and rec ord provided, Relator has not demonstrated he is enti tled to mandamus re lief. See T E X .R.A P P .P. 52.8. The mandamus re lief re quested is there fore DENI ED.

J une 23, 2010 ANN CRAWFORD McCL URE, J ustice
Be fore Chew, C.J ., McClure, a nd Rivera, JJ

. (Do Not Publish)
SERVED JANUARY 13, 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION '' ' r?:K:!K 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC ' ' 

IN THE MATTER OF 

AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP09SW0007 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2009-1043 

NOTICE OF HEARING DATES 

Paragraph #2 of the Procedural Order be and is hereby amended as follows: 

...On or before March 12, 2010, the parties shall conclude all discovery 

including, but not limited to, depositions, document production, responses to 

production requests and/or interrogatories. If the parties cannot resolve a discovery 

dispute they shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for resolution in a timely 

manner... 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered 

on March 22 and 23,2010, inclusive, in the National Transportation Safety Board 

Hearing, Room, 624 Six Flags Drive, Suite 150, Arlington, Texas, 76011. Hearings 

will commence at 9:00 a.m. and conclude at 4:30 p.m. each day. The parties should 

vacate the courthouse on or before 5:00 p.m. each day. 

Settled cases y/\\\ not be removed from the docket until the Judge receives the 

proper pleading(s). Pleadings may be forwarded by fax, express mail, courier or 

postal service. 

SO ORDERED. 

Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP09SW0007 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

American Eagle Airlines, Inc., Respondent 

ATTN: Peter Bowler, President 

1700 W. 20* Street, MD 1200 

P.O. Box 612527 

DFW Airport, TX 75261-2527 

Francis C. Heil, Respondent's Counsel 

American Airlines, Inc., Legal Department 

P.O. Box 619616, Mail Drop 5675 

DFW Airport, TX 75261 -9616 

TEL: 202-496-5642 

FAX: 202-496-5660 

Rena M. Price, Complainant's Counsel 

Safety Enforcement Branch, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region, ASW-7E1, RMP 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 

Fort Worth, TX 76137-0007 

TEL: 817-222-5068 

FAX: 817-222-5945/5092 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8287 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8287

  To amend title 54, United States Code, to increase public access to 
                  recreational areas on Federal land.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 17, 2020

 Mr. Biggs (for himself and Mr. Gosar) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 54, United States Code, to increase public access to 
                  recreational areas on Federal land.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE FOR RECREATIONAL PUBLIC ACCESS.

    Subsection (c) of section 200306 of title 54, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) by striking ``3 percent'' and inserting ``10 percent''; 
        and
            (2) by striking ``$15,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$50,000,000''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Wilbert RUFFIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D.M. CHRISTIAN, Police Officer; Aponte, Mr.; Police Officer; Buffkin, Mr.; Police Officer, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-7345

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 22, 2018

Decided: February 27, 2018

Wilbert Ruffin, Appellant Pro Se.

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Wilbert Ruffin appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen his closed 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Ruffin v. D.M. Christian,*No. 1:08-cv-00969-GBL-JFA (E.D. Va. Sept. 20, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade*345quately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 4, 2015

No. 04-14-00894-CR

Adam Paul EANNARINO,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR8490

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The 

Appellant’s brief is due June 4, 2015.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of June, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### Melvin PATTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

ED 105567 & ED 105560

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Filed: December 19, 2017

Gwenda Renee’ Robinson, Missouri Public Defender Office, 1010 Market Street, *788Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Garrick Aplin, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Lisa P. Page, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J, and Philip M. Hess, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Melvin Patton (“Movant”) appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion. Movant contends his trial counsel was ineffective in: (I) failing to request a cautionary instruction concerning the testimony of an in-custody informant, and (II) failing to move for the admission of two newspaper articles that could have been used to impeach the in-custody informant’s testimony. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
No. 11-1204.

#### U. S. Bank N. A. *v.*Aguayo.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
1200 G Street NW

Suite 600

Washington, DC 20005

 September 24, 2014 

Scott Baker

Sr. Business Solutions Analyst 

scott.baker@pjm.com

(610) 666-2235 

VIA EMAIL

U.S. Department of Energy 

Email: expartecommunications@hq.doe.gov

RE: Ex Parte Communication, Docket EERE-2012-BT-STD-0022 

To whom it may concern, 

 On September 21, 2014, representatives from PJM, NRECA, and Ogilvy Government 

Relations (Parties) met with Department of Energy staff concerning the proposed rulemaking 

referenced in the subject line above pertaining to residential storage water heaters. 

 In the meeting, Parties expressed concerns over the extraordinary delay in a final 

rulemaking in this docket, especially given the pending April 2015 deadline, at which point 

residential electric storage water heaters greater than 55 gallons must use heat pump technology 

as the primary heating source. Throughout this lengthy rulemaking, a diverse set of stakeholders 

have largely agreed that the DOE overlooked grid-interactive water heating technology in its 

final energy conversation standard pertaining to residential water heaters in 2010 (Final Rule)

and have worked in concert to develop constructive feedback on how the DOE can address this 

oversight through a waiver process. These stakeholders, including small business manufacturers, 

have gone to great lengths to achieve consensus on terms for establishing a waiver for grid 

interactive water heaters. The primary purpose of this meeting was to identify reasons for such 

delay and determine the timeline of a rulemaking.

Pertaining to the timeline, DOE staff was able to clarify for the Parties the process of 

Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review of final rulemakings, indicating that OMB 

initially screens proposed final rulemakings before determining whether the rulemaking will 

undergo further, and public, review. Parties suggested that this matter is perhaps in this initial 

screening phase of the process, as the OMB has not publicly posted this rulemaking to its 

webpage, but DOE staff could not confirm or deny. 

In closing, DOE staff represented the unforeseen complexity of this issue and circumstances that 

have delayed the issuance of a final ruling on the waiver. The Parties sincerely thank DOE staff 

the meeting and look forward to a final ruling soon. 

Sincerely,

/s/ Scott Baker

610.666.8980 | www.pjm.com
1200 G Street NW

Suite 600

Washington, DC 20005

Attachment: Comments of NRECA, ACEEE, and NRDC on Steffes Corporation Application for 

Exception to the Office of Hearings and Appeals 

Attendees:

 

Name Organization

Ashley Armstrong Department of Energy

Scott Baker PJM Interconnection

Julie Barkemeyer NRECA

Dan Cohen Department of Energy

Keith Dennis NRECA

Conrad Lass Ogilvy Government Relations

Jonathan Levy Department of Energy

610.666.8980 | www.pjm.com
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 828 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 828

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 25 Route 111 in Smithtown, New York, as the ``Congressman Bill 
                         Carney Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2019

Mr. Zeldin (for himself, Mr. King of New York, Mr. Suozzi, Miss Rice of 
New York, Mr. Meeks, Ms. Meng, Ms. Velazquez, Mr. Jeffries, Ms. Clarke 
of New York, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Rose of New York, Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney 
of New York, Mr. Espaillat, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, Mr. Serrano, Mr. Engel, 
  Mrs. Lowey, Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York, Mr. Delgado, Mr. 
 Tonko, Ms. Stefanik, Mr. Brindisi, Mr. Reed, Mr. Katko, Mr. Morelle, 
 Mr. Higgins of New York, and Mr. Collins of New York) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 25 Route 111 in Smithtown, New York, as the ``Congressman Bill 
                         Carney Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONGRESSMAN BILL CARNEY POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 25 Route 111 in Smithtown, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Congressman Bill Carney Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Congressman Bill Carney Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
#### FLEETWAY CAPITAL CORP., Respondent v. SH & T EXPRESS, LLC, Shukri Temirov, Guarantor, Khalida Temirov, Guarantor, Shuhrat Temirov, Guarantor, Transport Carrier House, LLC, Guarantor, Sevila Trucking, Inc., Guarantor and Temur Trucking, Inc., Guarantor, Petitioners

No. 268 EAL 2017

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

January 3, 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.