alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Christopher Stephon WASHINGTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF the VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-7656

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 22, 2018

Decided: February 27, 2018

Christopher Stephon ' Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Stallard, Assistant Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Stephon Washington seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Washington has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Washington’s motion for transcripts at government expense, deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DIGITAL DJ HOLDINGS,  INC. AS OF MARCH
31, 2000 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS,

</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               64933
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       131467
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    197719
<PP&E>                                              188241
<DEPRECIATION>                                      145255
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     2703325
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               866119
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             13178
<OTHER-SE>                                        (1589008)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        270325
<SALES>                                             366770
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    366770
<CGS>                                                  245
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          245
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   1194839
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  115609
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (793723)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         30800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (974523)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      55314
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (719209)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.14)



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7782

JOHN ANTHONY TURNER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD MOATS, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA97-1585-S) Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 13, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Anthony Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: John Anthony Turner seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Turner v. Moats , No. CA-97-1585-S (D. Md. Dec. 2, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN 
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                              JAN-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                                          19,698
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    9,316
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                     0
<PP&E>                                                         376,464
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  59,560
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 373,543
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                0
<BONDS>                                                        323,501
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                                      24,453
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   373,543
<SALES>                                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               101,559
<CGS>                                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   59,655
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              23,576
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  3,609
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     1,427
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              2,182
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     2,182
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                     2.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     2.73
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**
**Certifications**
Certification of Principal Executive Officer
I, Robert C. Strauss, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of theBoard of Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc., certify that:
1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Noven Pharmaceuticals,Inc. for the three months ended March 31, 2004;
2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.       /s/ Robert C. Strauss Name:  Robert C. Strauss  Title:  President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board Date:     May 3, 2004  
30
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul Leonard HODGE, a.k.a. Bubba, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-12168 Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(January 19, 2018)

Peter Decklin Leary, U.S. Attorney Service — Middle District of Georgia, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Macon, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Markus F. Boenig, Palmore Boenig *&*Associates, PC, Athens, GA, for Defendant-Appellant

Before MARCUS, ROSENBAUM and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. *United States v. Bushert,*997 F.2d 1343, 1350 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); *United States v. Weaver,*275 F.3d 1320, 1333 (11th Cir. 2001) (enforcing a sentence appeal waiver where the defendant agreed that she understood the waiver provision and entered into it freely and voluntarily); *United States v. Cesal,*391 F.3d 1172, 1182 (11th Cir. 2004) (enforcing a sentence appeal waiver where the district court read the waiver exceptions and the defendant stated that he had read the plea agreement and understood it), *vacated and remanded on other grounds,*545 U.S. 1101, 125 S.Ct. 2553, 162 L.Ed.2d 272 (2005), *reinstated,*No. 03-15090, 2004 WL 2663906, manuscript op. at 3 (11th Cir, July 13, 2005).
# C_2021128EN.01004601.xml

| 12.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/46

---

Action brought on 19 February 2021 — Amisi Kumba v Council

(Case T-107/21)

(2021/C 128/56)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Gabriel Amisi Kumba (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, A. Guillerme and T. Payan, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/2033 of 10 December 2020, in so far as the applicant remains at No 2 in the annex to that decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/2033 of 10 December 2020, in so far as the applicant remains at No 2 in the annex to that decision;

| — | annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2021 of 10 December 2020, in so far as the applicant remains at No 2 in the annex to that regulation; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2021 of 10 December 2020, in so far as the applicant remains at No 2 in the annex to that regulation;

| — | order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law, which are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-103/21, Boshab v Council.

---
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 63 (Friday, April 1, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 19138]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06873]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET


Delegation of Apportionment Authority

AGENCY: Office of Management and Budget, Executive Office of the 
President.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to The Executive Office of the President 
Appropriations Act, 2022, the Office of Management and Budget is 
publishing the current delegation of apportionment authority.

DATES: This delegation became effective on March 24, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heather V. Walsh at 202-395-3642 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#511c13097f1e1c137f1e1612113e3c337f343e217f363e27"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ce838c96e081838ce081898d8ea1a3ace0aba1bee0a9a1b8">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Delegation of Apportionment Authority

    I hereby delegate to each Deputy Associate Director (DAD) the 
authorities delegated by the President to the Director of the Office of 
Management and Budget for apportioning funds pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 
1513.
    In the event that a DAD is on leave and therefore unable to 
apportion funds, the authority for apportioning funds is hereby 
delegated to the individual serving as the Acting DAD.
    This delegation supersedes any previous delegation of such 
authority, and shall remain in effect until revoked. This delegation 
does not limit the authority of the Director to exercise the delegated 
authority.

Shalanda D. Young,
Director, Office of Management and Budget.
[FR Doc. 2022-06873 Filed 3-31-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 41 (Monday, March 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9441-9442]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5165]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings of the National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis 
Panel:

    Agenda Purpose: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Committee Name: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: March 17, 1997.
    Time: 11 a.m.
    Place: Parklawn, Room 9-101, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 
20857.

[[Page 9442]]

    Contact Person: Shirley H. Maltz, Parklawn, Room 9-101, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, Telephone: 301, 443-3936.

    Committee Name: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: March 18, 1997.
    Time: 3 p.m.
    Place: Parklawn, Room 9C-18, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 
20857.
    Contact Person: Emeline M. Otey, Parklawn, Room 9C-18, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, Telephone: 301, 443-4868.
    The meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numbers 93.242, 
93.281, 93.282)

    Dated: February 25, 1997.
LeVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-5165 Filed 2-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit
32.1









CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Beverly Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jonathan Roylance, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350,
as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.         The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.








April
      25, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Jonathan
      RoylanceJonathan
      RoylancePresident,
      Chief Executive Officer,Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and
      Director (Principal Executive, Financial, and Accounting
      Officer)
EXHIBIT 35.1








ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC








The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2014 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") among CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2014-4, as Issuer (the "Issuer"), CarMax Auto Funding LLC, as Depositor, and CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer (the "Servicer"), does hereby certify that:





|   |                                                                                                              
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.




|   |                                                                                      
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate.




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|3. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning onMarch 1, 2017and ending onFebruary 28, 2018and of the Servicer's performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made under my supervision.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.







Capitalized terms used in this certificate and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Sale and Servicing Agreement.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Servicer, has duly executed this Officer's Certificate this 18th day of May, 2018 .





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC





/s/ Enrique Mayor-Mora


Enrique Mayor-Mora


Vice President and Treasurer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 8, 2012 

Order 

 

February 8, 2012 

143046 (42) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 SC: 143046 

v COA: 298893 

Muskegon CC: 09-057782-FH 

DAVID MARK COLE, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

___________________________________ 

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by defendant-appellant for extension to 

February 2, 2012 of the time for filing his brief and appendix is considered and it is 

granted.