alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Philip Jason LAMPE Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-2621

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: February 14, 2018

Filed: February 26, 2018

Clifford R. Cronk, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Davenport, IA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Philip Jason Lampe, Pro Se

Before GRUENDER, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Philip Lampe directly appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), suggesting that the sentence is substantively unreasonable. In a pro se brief, Lampe also appears to challenge the reasonableness of the sentence; he further contests the district court’s drug-quantity calculation and states that he was tricked into pleading guilty.

After careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose a substantively unreasonable sentence. See United States v. Salazar-Aleman, 741 F.3d 878, 881 (8th Cir. 2013) (discussing appellate review of sentencing decisions). We also conclude that Lampe’s drug-quantity challenge is foreclosed because he stipulated to the drug quantity and resulting base offense level that the district court used to determine the applicable Guidelines range. See United States v. Nguyen, 46 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1995) (defendant who explicit ly and voluntarily exposes himself to specific sentence may not challenge that punishment on appeal). To the extent Lampe asserts that he received ineffective assistance of counsel or that his guilty plea was involuntary, we decline to consider these arguments on direct appeal. See United States v. Umanzor, 617 F.3d 1053, 1060 (8th Cir. 2010) (if defendant did not move to withdraw plea in district court, he may not challenge voluntariness of plea for first time on direct appeal); United States v. McAdory, 501 F.3d 868, 872 (8th Cir. 2007) *591(this court ordinarily defers ineffective-assistance claims to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceedings).

Having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues'for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.
Exhibit 11
COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE AMOUNTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                           Twelve months ended
                                                                            December 31, 1998
                                                                  ------------------------------------
                                                                         1998                1997
                                                                  -----------------  -----------------
<S>                                                                  <C>                <C>          
Net loss                                                             $ (2,769,046)      $ (1,799,146)
                                                                                         
  Series B preferred stock dividend                                                    
                                                                          (17,578)           (40,692)
  Series C redeemable preferred
     stock dividend and accretion                                                      
                                                                          (79,873)                 -
                                                                  -----------------  -----------------
Loss applicable to common shareholders                               $ (2,866,497)      $ (1,839,838)
                                                                                         
                                                                  =================  =================

Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding                  51,484,605         22,339,773
                                                                                          

Common  equivalent  shares   representing  shares  issuable  upon      14,214,599          5,285,212
exercise of stock options
                                                                 
Add back of common equivalents shares due to antidilutive shares      (14,214,599)        (5,285,212)
                                                                                        
                                                                  -----------------  -----------------
Dilutive adjusted weighted average shares                              51,484,605         22,339,773
                                                                                         
                                                                  =================  =================


Basic net loss per share                                                               
                                                                            (0.06)              (0.08)

Diluted net loss per share                                                             
                                                                            (0.06)              (0.08)


</TABLE>
MEMORANDUM

DATE: 11/24/14

FROM: Ken Mitchell/EPA Region 4

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

SUBJECT: Discussion of the Clean Power Plan at the Carolinas Air Pollution Control Association Fall 

Meeting

SUMMARY: 

The Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards provided information on the Clean Power Plan

to participants at Carolinas Air Pollution Control Association Fall Meeting in Myrtle Beach, SC, on 

October 16, 2014. The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2,

2014. 

ATTENDEES:

EPA

Lisa Conner/EPA OAQPS

External Stakeholders

Tom Effinger/SCANA Corporation

Tom Lorenzen/Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Don van der Vaart/NC DENR

Bill Lane/ Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton

Approximately 150 other attendees

ATTACHMENT
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 64 (Monday, April 4, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19534-19535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07148]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

    The National Science Board's Executive Committee hereby gives 
notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of 
National Science Board business, pursuant to the National Science 
Foundation Act and the Government in the Sunshine Act.

TIME AND DATE: Tuesday, April 5, 2022, from 2:00-3:00 p.m. EDT.

PLACE: This meeting will be held by teleconference through the National 
Science Foundation.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Committee Chair's opening remarks; approval 
of Executive Committee minutes of January 26, 2022; and discuss issues 
and topics for an agenda of the NSB meeting scheduled for May 5-6, 
2022.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Point of contact for this meeting 
is: Nirmala Kannankutty, 703/292-8000. Members of the public can 
observe this meeting through a You Tube livestream. The link is https://youtu.be/3qY4Jf5RAvY. Information about meeting updates is available 
from the

[[Page 19535]]

NSB website at https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/meetings/index.jsp#up.

Chris Blair,
Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.
[FR Doc. 2022-07148 Filed 3-31-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of
Chief Executive Officer
of VCA Antech, Inc.

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q
(the Report) for the period ended June 30, 2003 of VCA Antech, Inc. (the
Issuer).

I, Robert L. Antin, the Chief Executive Officer of Issuer certify that to
the best of my knowledge:



| | (i)  |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | ---- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Issuer.       

Dated: August 11, 2003

| |                      
| | ---------------------
| | /s/ Robert L. Antin  
| |                      
| | Name: Robert L. Antin

57
Exhibit









Cornelis David Arends




December 13, 2017


Extension assignment agreement


Dear Kees, 
You are currently assigned by Cimpress N.V. to Cimpress France SARL under the terms of the Long Term Assignment Agreement dated December 9, 2015 (Annex A). 
In our letter of today, we have agreed that your employment agreement with Cimpress N.V. will be extended as from January 10, 2018 for an indefinite term. 
We hereby also agree that your assignment at Cimpress France SARL will continue under the same terms as from January 10, 2018 until July 31, 2018 at the latest. 
Please return a signed copy of this letter to Cimpress N.V. to confirm you agree to this. 


Sincerely,
Robert Keane
Chairman of the Management Board


	
		
	/s/Robert S. Keane
Cimpress N.V.


Dated: 18 December 2017
	/s/Cornelis David Arends
Cornelis David Arends


Dated: 15 December 2017






Annex A: Long Term Assignment Agreement dated December 9, 2015 




ST\ASD\19674787.1
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 11.1

                     COMPUTATION OF WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES
                       OUTSTANDING AND EARNINGS PER SHARE
                 (in thousands of dollars except share amounts)
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            Third Quarter                          Nine Months
                                    ------------------------------       ------------------------------
                                        1996              1995               1996              1995
                                    -----------        -----------       -----------        -----------
<S>                               <C>                <C>               <C>                <C>      
Actual common shares
outstanding                           4,679,697          4,678,729         4,679,697          4,679,697

Common shares issuable
  under outstanding stock
  options                                    --             49,017                --                 --

Stock repurchase                       (705,300)                --          (705,300)                --

Weighted average common
  shares issued upon exercise
  of stock options                       22,500                905            11,311                 --

Total weighted average
 shares outstanding                   3,996,897          4,728,651         3,985,708          4,679,697
                                    ===========        ===========       ===========        ===========

Net income (loss)                   $       870        $        71       $       162        $    (4,494)
                                    ===========        ===========       ===========        ===========

Net income (loss) per share         $       .22        $       .02       $       .04        $      (.96)
                                    ===========        ===========       ===========        ===========
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6076
STEVEN HAWKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHARLES COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; CHARLES J. MCDEVITT, Warden; WALTER POYNER, JR., Security Chief, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-410-AW) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 4, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Steven Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Charles Crum, Jr., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to vacate the order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hawkins v. Charles County Detention Ctr. , No. CA-95-410-AW (D. Md. Dec. 21, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 13.1

Certification by the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cellectis S.A. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, André Choulika, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 21, 2016                                        
|                                                            
|/s/ André Choulika                                          
|Name: André Choulika                                        
|Title: Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

Press Release

SOURCE: Dynegy Inc.

Dynegy Names Louis Dorey CFO, Rob Doty Resigns

Analyst Call Scheduled for Monday, June 24

HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--June 19, 2002--Dynegy Inc. (NYSE:DYN - News) today
announced the resignation of Rob Doty as executive vice president and chief
financial officer and the appointment of Louis Dorey as his replacement.

Doty was with Dynegy for 10 years, serving in various senior positions in
accounting and finance before being named CFO in 2000.

The company said Dorey's appointment is consistent with Dynegy's continued focus
on enhancing its financial position, strengthening its balance sheet and
improving its credit profile.

"Our business environment calls for a different set of skills as we address the
changes in our industry," said CEO Dan Dienstbier. "Louis has a unique
combination of commercial and financial knowledge and experience that will serve
Dynegy and its stakeholders well as we structure our future," he added.

Dorey most recently served as president of Energy Marketing and Origination at
Dynegy, where he was responsible for the management of the company's wholesale
power and gas marketing and origination business. Prior to that assignment, he
was executive vice president of Strategy and Planning for Dynegy Marketing and
Trade. Dorey joined Dynegy as vice president of Finance and Planning in 1997,
when the company merged with Destec Energy.

Dorey holds a law degree from The University of Texas School of Law and a
bachelor's degree in business administration from the University of Oklahoma.

Dynegy will simulcast a conference call to discuss its restructuring plan live
via the Internet on Monday, June 24 at 2:00 p.m. ET, 1:00 p.m. CT. The web cast
can be accessed via www.dynegy.com (click on "Investor Relations").

Dynegy Inc. produces and delivers energy, including natural gas, power, natural
gas liquids and coal, through its owned and contractually controlled network of
physical assets. The company serves customers by aggregating production and
supply and delivering value-added solutions to meet their energy needs. The
company's website is www.dynegy.com.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION NOTICE OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:

87 FR 15422.

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING:

Thursday, March 24, 2022 at 10:00 a.m.

# CHANGES IN THE MEETING:

*The following matters were also considered:*

REG 2015-04 (Citizens United II)—Draft Notice of Disposition

REG 2014-09 (Federal Contractors)—Draft Notice of Disposition

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

*Authority:*                         Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Vicktoria J. Allen,

Acting Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2022-06606 Filed 3-24-22; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
AFS
- 13
- 089
- E

December 11, 2012 Exemption No. 10245A Regulatory

Docket No. FAA
- 2011
- 0266
Mr. Dean Ellis Windy City Fly er/Windy

City Charter 1098 S. Milwaukee Avenue, Suite 30 1 Wheeling, I L 60090 Dear Mr. Ellis : This letter is to inform y ou that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 10245 . I t explains the basis for our decision , describes its effect, and lists the conditions and limitations. **The Basis for Our Decision**  By letter dated November 20, 2012 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Windy City Fly er/Windy

City Charter ( Windy

City ) for an extension of Exemption No. 10245 . That exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows Windy City , which is operating under separate parts of 14 CFR, to cover its safety
- sensitive employ ees under one drug testing program. Inyour petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register beca use the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Windy City
.2

**Our Decision** The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10245 remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegat ed to me, Igrant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations. **Conditions and Li mitations**  1. Employ ees of Windy

City are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the Windy

City part 135 o peration, not under part 91. **The Effect of Our Decision** Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 10245 to April 30, 2015, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. Sincerely , /s/ Frederick E. Tilton, M.D. Federal Air Surgeon
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                        CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906

         Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of Tutogen Medical Inc., a Florida corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         The Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report for the quarter ended
December 31, 2005 (the "Form 10-Q/A") of the Company fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

         Dated: July 6, 2006

         /s/ Guy L. Mayer
         -------------------------------
         Guy L. Mayer
         Chief Executive Officer


         Dated: July 6, 2006

         /s/ Robert Johnston, Jr.
         -------------------------------
         Robert Johnston, Jr.
         Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In re Laura Fredrika PLUMA, Debtor, Laura Fredrika Pluma, Appellant, v. Tax Collector for the County of San Diego, Appellee.

No. 04-55107.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Oct. 21, 2005.

Filed Oct. 31, 2005.

Brian M. Mahoney, American Debt Relief, San Diego, CA, for the appellant.

Timothy M. Barry, Senior Deputy County Counsel, San Diego, CA, for the appel-lee.

Before TASHIMA and RAYMOND C. FISHER, Circuit Judges, and MILTON I. SHADUR,* Senior District Judge.

*

 The Honorable Milton I. Shadur, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”), *Tax Collector v. Pluma (In re Pluma),*303 B.R. 444 (9th Cir. BAP 2003), reversing the judgment of the bankruptcy court, *see In re Pluma,*289 B.R. 151 (Bankr.S.D.Cal. 2003).1 We affirm the judgment of the *1164BAP for the reasons stated in its opinion, 303 B.R. 444, *supra,*and remand to the bankruptcy court for further proceedings.

AFFIRMED.

1

. We deny appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal,