alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cornelius Keith SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-7264

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 28, 2018

Decided: March 7, 2018

Cornelius Keith Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Timothy Severo, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before KEENAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

*253Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Cornelius Keith Smith seeks to appeal his criminal judgment entered in January 2011, his amended criminal judgment entered in January 2012, and the district court’s April 2016 order granting his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. *See*4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Smith’s informal brief does not address the April 2016 order, Smith has forfeited appellate review of this order. *See Jackson v. Lightsey,*775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”).* In addition, because Smith has already appealed the January 2011 and January 2012 judgments, *see United States v. Smith,*498 Fed.Appx. 359 (4th Cir. 2012); *United States v. Smith,*450 Fed. Appx. 306 (4th Cir. 2011), the appeals from these judgments are duplicative.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s April 2016 order and dismiss as duplicative the appeals from the January 2011 and January 2012 judgments. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED IN PART, DISMISSED IN PART*

*

**Although Smith’s appeal of the April 2016 order is untimely, the Government has not moved to dismiss, and we discern no basis on which to sua sponte dismiss this part of the appeal as untimely. *See United States v. Oliver,*878 F.3d 120, 122, 128-29 (4th Cir. 2017).
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7030

LEE THOMAS RIVERS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus GLENN CAMPBELL, Sheriff, Darlington County Sheriff Depart ment; CALVIN JACKSON, Investigator, Darlington County Sheriff Department; L. C. BRADDOCK, Investigator, Darlington County Sheriff Department; J. C. MCLEOD, Investigator, Darlington County Sheriff Department, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-05-708-3) Submitted: November 30, 2005 Decided: December 12, 2005 Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lee Thomas Rivers, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Lee Thomas Rivers, Jr., appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Rivers v. Campbell , No. CA-05-708-3 (D.S.C. June 15, 2005). We deny Appellant’s request to substitute counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Addendum to the United State Election Assistance Commission Fiscal Year 2010 

Congressional Budget Justification 

May 8, 2009 

Revision to the United State Election Assistance Commission Fiscal Year 2010 Congressional Budget 

Justification, Section 2.B. Appropriations Language and Explanation of Changes, Page 16, insert: 

ELECTION REFORM PROGRAMS 

 For necessary expenses relating to election reform programs, [$106,000,000] 

$52,000,000, to remain available until expended, of which [$100,000,000] $50,000,000

shall be for requirements payments under part 1 of subtitle D of title II of the Help 

America Vote Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-252), [$5,000,000] and $2,000,000 shall be 

for grants to carry out research on voting technology improvements as authorized under 

part 3 of subtitle D of title II of such Act [, and $1,000,000, shall be to conduct a pilot 

program for grants to States and units of local government for pre-election logic and 

accuracy testing and post-election voting systems verification]. (Financial Services and 

General Government Appropriations Act, 2009.)
(logo)Prudential

 

 

**PrudentialAsset Resources**

PGIMReal Estate Finance

2100Ross Avenue, Suite 2500, Dallas TX 75201

Tel214-777-4500

 

Abusiness of Prudential Financial, Inc.

 

WellsFargo Bank, National Association

CommercialMortgage Servicing

MACD1086

550South Tryon Street, 14th Floor

Charlotte,North Carolina 28202

Attention:Asset Manager

 

RE:         **WFCM 2015-C26**

Period: **January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019(the “Reporting Period”)**

 

**AnnualCompliance Statement**

 

 

I,Joni Brown-Haas, in my capacity as President and Managing Director ofPrudential Asset Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certify with regard tothe Company’s role as Sub-Servicer under the Sub-Servicing Agreement, (the“Agreement”) dated as of February 1, 2015, pertaining to the above-referencedcertificates, that:

 

(i)      areview of the activities of the Company under the Agreement during the periodnoted above, and of the performance of the Company under the Agreement duringthe relevant period has been made under my supervision, and

 

(ii)    to thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled all itsobligations under the Agreement throughout the relevant period, and

 

(iii)   to the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled its obligationsunder its sub-servicing agreement in all material respects, and

 

(iv)    the Company hasmaintained an effective internal control system over the servicing of mortgageloans including the Loans serviced by the Company, and

 

(v)    theCompany has not received any notice regarding qualification, or challenging thestatus of the Lower Tier REMIC or the Upper Tier REMIC as a REMIC, from the IRSor any other governmental agency or body.

 

 

Effectiveas of February 21, 2020

 

/s/Joni Brown-Haas

JoniBrown-Haas

Presidentand Managing Director

PrudentialAsset Resources, Inc.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014, byand among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as GeneralMasterServicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as General Special Servicer, NCB,FSB, as NCB Master Servicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Special Servicer, PENTALPHASURVEILLANCE LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asCertificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, andWILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C22 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the General Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 throughDecember 31, 2016, (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performanceper the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge,based on such review, the General Master Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 67 (Thursday, April 7, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 20462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07351]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-1563 (Final)]


Raw Honey From Ukraine; Termination of Investigation

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On March 24, 2022, counsel for petitioners, the American Honey 
Producers Association and the Sioux Honey Association, filed with the 
Department of Commerce and the Commission a withdrawal of their 
petition regarding imports of raw honey from Ukraine. Accordingly, the 
antidumping duty investigation concerning raw honey from Ukraine 
(Investigation No. 731-TA-1563 (Final)) is terminated.

DATES: March 31, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andres Andrade (202-205-2078), Office 
of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street 
SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that 
information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the 
Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility 
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the 
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. 
General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by 
accessing its internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public 
record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's 
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
    Authority: This investigation is being terminated under authority 
of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 and pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 
1673c(a)(1)(A) and section 207.40(a) of the Commission's rules (19 CFR 
207.40(a)). This notice is published pursuant to section 201.10 of the 
Commission's rules (19 CFR 201.10).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: April 1, 2022.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-07351 Filed 4-6-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 9- 13 06

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Tod d M cDo na ld ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v. Bret t Ca rp en te r, Lieu te na nt , Sal in e Co un ty D et en ti on Cen te r (SCDC ) (Ori gi na ll y na m edas C arp en te r); Ton y a Par ke r, Serg ean t, SC DC (Ori gi na ll y na m edas P ark er) ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lDefe nd

an ts - App el le es W ai te , Offic er, SCDC ; Di ck , Offic er, SCDC ; Ba ld in g, Co rp or al , SCDC

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lDefe nd

an t s

__
__ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Eas te rn Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s - Li tt le Ro ck

__
__ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Aug us t 2 0, 2 01 9 Fil ed : Au gu st 27 , 20 19 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re COLLOTON, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Cir cu it Ju dg es .

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.In th is 42 U.S.C. § 19 83 act io n, in m at e Tod d McDo na l d a p p e a l s th e di st ric t

co ur t’s ad ve rs e g ran t o f su m m ary jud gm en t. Bas edon th e rec or d b efo re the co ur t, 1 we ag ree th at McDo na ld fai le d to sh ow he ex ha us te d ad m in is tra ti ve rem ed ie s on th e cl ai m s rai se d in th e in st an t act io n. See Town se nd v. Mu rp hy, 89 8 F.3 d 78 0, 78 3- 84 (8 th Ci r. 20 18 ) (rev ie win g de no vo gr an t of su m m ary jud gm en t; bo un da rie s of pr op er ex ha us ti on are de te rm in ed by pr is on ’s sp eci fic ad m in is tra ti ve req ui rem en ts ). The jud gm en t i s af

fir m ed . See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le Su sa n We b b er Wrig ht , Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e 1 East ern Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s, ad op ti ng th e rep or t an d reco mm e n d a t i on s of th e Hon or ab le Pat ric ia S. Harri s, Uni te d St at es Mag is tra te Ju dg e fo r th e East ern Dis tri ct of Arka ns as . -2

-
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 99

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing concern over recent events in the Recratically elected president. military coup d’etat of that country’s first demo- public of Sierra Leone in the wake of the recent
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 99

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas for the first time in almost 30 years, the Republic

of Sierra Leone held their first truly democratic

multiparty elections to elect a president and parliament

and put an end to military rule;

Whereas the elections held on February 26, 1996, and the

subsequent runoff election held on March 15, 1996, were

deemed by international and domestic observers to be
2

•HCON 99 EH

free and fair and legitimate expressions of the will of the

people of the Republic of Sierra Leone;

Whereas on May 25, 1997, a military coup d’etat against the

democratically elected Government of the Republic of Sierra Leone, including President Ahmed Tejan Kabbah,

took place;

Whereas the coup d’etat, led by Major Johnny Paul Koroma

and the Armed Forces Ruling Council (AFRC) on May

25, 1997, signifies a giant step backward for freedom

and democracy in the Republic of Sierra Leone;

Whereas there has been fighting, killing, looting and a disruption of relief supplies in the Republic of Sierra Leone

since the coup d’etat; and

Whereas the best solution to this crisis would be a peaceful

solution: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) condemns the leaders and members of the

4 rebellious Armed Forces Ruling Council (AFRC) for

5 ousting the democratically elected Government of the

6 Republic of Sierra Leone, including President

7 Ahmed Tejan Kabbah;

8 (2) urges an immediate end to all violence in

9 the Republic of Sierra Leone;

10 (3) encourages the members of the AFRC to

11 negotiate a hand-over of power back to the demo12 cratically elected Government of the Republic of Si-
3

•HCON 99 EH

1 erra Leone in order to restore order and democracy

2 in the country;

3 (4) encourages all citizens of the Republic of Si4 erra Leone to work together to bring about a peace5 ful solution to the current conflict;

6 (5) reaffirms the United States support of the

7 democratically elected Government of the Republic

8 of Sierra Leone led by President Ahmed Tejan

9 Kabbah;

10 (6) urges the members of the AFRC and all

11 armed elements involved in the conflict to ensure the

12 protection and safety of international aid agencies

13 and personnel serving in the country, and allow

14 them unobstructed access to affected areas to deliver

15 emergency humanitarian relief to people in need;

16 and

17 (7) commends the Organization of African

18 Unity for calling on all African countries, and the

19 international community at large, to refrain from

20 recognizing the new regime or lending support in
4

•HCON 99 EH

1 any form whatsoever to the perpetrators of the coup

2 d’etat, the AFRC.

Passed the House of Representatives July 22, 1997.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Milton Osbeli LOPEZ-ESQUIVEL, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40572 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 22, 2018

*333Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Milton Osbeli Lopez-Esquivel, Pro Se

Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Milton Osbeli Lopez-Esquivel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Lopez-Esquivel has not filed a proper response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cib. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                        $144,668
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   $2,508
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              $201,824
<PP&E>                                         $14,735
<DEPRECIATION>                                  $8,772
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                $207,787
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         $811,459
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                   $210,000
<COMMON>                                      $344,831
<OTHER-SE>                                $(1,159,987)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  $207,787
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                $6,683
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             $(125,063)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         $(125,063)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 $10,288
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                $(114,775)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       5,704,014              17,521,745
<SECURITIES>                                 1,595,167                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  113,704                 554,210
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,498,671              18,241,050
<PP&E>                                       5,278,671              13,278,627
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,343,578)             (4,702,296)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,450,504              26,827,189
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          233,908               2,253,565
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       14,181,659                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        29,879                  68,412
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,270,198)              24,505,212
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,450,504              26,827,189
<SALES>                                        274,511                 851,827
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               568,892               1,329,343
<CGS>                                        1,864,190               2,007,206
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,864,190               2,007,206
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,193,077               2,057,501
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           (2,488,375)             (2,735,364)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,488,375)             (2,735,364)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,488,375)             (2,735,364)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,488,375)             (2,735,364)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.14)                  (1.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>