alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. (S)1350

      (ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the periodic report of Dynegy Holdings Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 dated April 15, 2003, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Nick J. Caruso,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
     as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     at the dates and for the periods indicated.




Date: April 15, 2003                            /s/ Nick J. Caruso
                                                -------------------------
                                                Nick J. Caruso
                                                Executive Vice President and
                                                Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 2 , 2021 

# Order

Clerk April 2 , 2021

161665 ( 7 5 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 161665

v COA: 34 1969

Wayne CC: 16

- 007429

- FC

SCOTT ROSEAN ODUM

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_______________________________________ _ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of Aaron Cyars to file a brief amicus curiae

is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on April 1 , 2021 , is accepted for filing

.
**··-·~-(J'l:** 

# ....**-~.,-.,_,,.,_..,a:.** 

## .. _,....:_...,...,**---lloo-·-··-·-----·~"-----llrODoo** 

# ..**~~--** 

# ..**"'- _.** **....,.,.__ffl~~'J~W41**

and l .,lfll!l 

# _ ...... ,. 

# ...... 

# _ .. 

# ___ ,..,**-~- ~m~:t** **o:** .... ____ _



# ..... "lllli)'lt'-'"---
-.
.... "lllli)'ltll-**~** _ llllpl;

.. __ .. tu .- ............ .. 

# _._.ewo..,.••- 

# _...,
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Foreign Assets Control

# AGENCY:

Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC's determination that one or more applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them.

# DATES:

                        See                         **Supplementary Information**                         section for effective date(s).                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

OFAC: Andrea Gacki, Director, tel.: 202-622-2490; Associate Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202-622-2420; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480; Assistant Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202-622-4855; or Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 202-622-2490.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Electronic Availability

                    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are available on OFAC's website (                    *https://www.treasury.gov/​ofac*).                

## Notice of OFAC Actions

On April 1, 2022, OFAC determined that the property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following persons are blocked under the relevant sanctions authority listed below. 
      ( print page 20515)          ( print page 20516)    
*Authority:*E.O. 13382, 70 FR 38567, 3 CFR, 2006 Comp., p. 170.                

Dated: April 1, 2022.

Andrea M. Gacki,

Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control U.S. Department of the Treasury.

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P

[FR Doc. 2022-07393 Filed 4-6-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-C
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,608                   3,640
<SECURITIES>                                     7,432                   4,082
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,335                   4,238
<ALLOWANCES>                                       151                     218
<INVENTORY>                                      1,334                   1,503
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,982                  13,622
<PP&E>                                           5,000                   4,520
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,343                   3,441
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,726                  17,202
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,664                   7,199
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            12                      12
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,979                   8,375
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,726                  17,202
<SALES>                                          6,538                   6,969
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,608                   8,904
<CGS>                                            3,417                   3,384
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,216                   4,695
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,469                   9,535
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  70                      81
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,706)                 (4,876)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,706)                 (4,876)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,706)                 (4,876)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.72)                   (.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
Defense Threat Reduction Agency Celebrates Vaccine Lab Upgrades with Government of Kenya
 
  By Andrea Chaney
                 www.dtra.mil.
#### AURORA SPA & BOUTIQUE v. DEPT. OF LABOR

20170742

Supreme Court of Utah.

11-14-2017

20160341, 402 P.3d 813

Petition for Writ of Certiorari Denied.
No. 11-1502.

#### Loan Phoung *v.*Tran.

Sup. Ct. Va. Certio-rari denied.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio Paulito PLAKETTA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-50156

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 13, 2018 *

Filed February 16, 2018

*678Matthew Craig Brehra, Helen H. Hong, Daniel Earl Zipp, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, Office of the US Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Roxana Sandoval, Zandra Luz Lopez, Attorney, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc,, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Antonio Paulito Plaketta appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 33-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for transportation of certain aliens and aiding and abetting, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii), (v)(II). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Plaketta contends that the district court erred in enhancing his offense level under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(b)(6) (permitting enhancement where the offense “involve[s] intentionally or recklessly creating a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury to another person”). We review the district court’s identification of the correct legal standard de novo, the district court’s findings of fact for clear error, and the application of the Guidelines to those facts for abuse of discretion. *See United States v. Gasca-Ruiz,*852 F.3d 1167, 1170 (9th Cir. 2017) (en banc). Contrary to Plaketta’s contention, the record demonstrates that the district applied the correct legal standard. Under the circumstances of this case, the court’s shorthand reference to “bodily injury,” rather than “serious bodily injury,” is insufficient to overcome the presumption that the district court knows the law and applied it in making its decision. *See United States v. Carty,*520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). Moreover, the record reflects that the district court considered the facts of this particular case and did not apply a per se rule. The district court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that the manner in which the alien was transported in this case made the additional risk to him “significantly greater than the risks normally borne by ordinary passengers during normal vehicular travel.” *United States v. Torres-Flores,*502 F.3d 885, 891 (9th Cir. 2007).

AFFIRMED.

**

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid*679ed by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 184

Expressing the sense of Congress that the motion picture industry should

work to discourage tobacco use among our youth.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 6, 1997

Mr. LUTHER submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Commerce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that the motion picture

industry should work to discourage tobacco use among

our youth.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. YOUTH TOBACCO USE.

Whereas addiction to tobacco by our youth represents a serious threat to the individuals using tobacco and to those

who inhale second hand smoke as well as the public at

large due to the increased health care costs for tobacco

related illness;

Whereas efforts to combat tobacco use among our youth is

a goal common to antismoking and smokers rights

groups alike;
2

•HCON 184 IH

Whereas the President, the Food and Drug Administration,

and public and private health officials across the Nation

are pursuing an agenda of discouraging youth access to

tobacco, and preventing of smoking and tobacco use; and

Whereas while Government officials and agencies, together

with the private sector, can provide leadership in efforts

to stop youth access to and use of tobacco, success in this

endeavor will be greatly enhanced by additional voices

and actions from across America: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that all

3 individuals involved in the motion picture industry, includ4 ing directors, actors, producers, and others, should recog5 nize that the portrayal of tobacco use by actors projects

6 cultural acceptance that negatively influences children,

7 and that the industry should use its leadership role and

8 voluntarily assist in discouraging youth tobacco use by

9 eliminating the use of tobacco products in its productions,

10 except for productions which portray the dangers of to11 bacco use.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of US Unwired Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 (the "Report"), I, Jerry E.
Vaughn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Jerry E. Vaughn

------------------------
Jerry E. Vaughn
Chief Financial Officer
November 11, 2002
IA

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 27

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide

for four-year terms for Representatives, to provide that the election

of Representatives shall occur in the same year as the election of the

President, and to limit the number of terms Senators and Representatives

may serve.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 9, 1997

Mr. GRAHAM (for himself, Mrs. FOWLER, and Mr. MCCOLLUM) introduced the

following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the

Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to provide for four-year terms for Representatives,

to provide that the election of Representatives shall occur

in the same year as the election of the President, and

to limit the number of terms Senators and Representatives may serve.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all
2

•HJ 27 IH

1 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

2 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

3 States within seven years after the date of its submission

4 for ratification:

5 ‘‘ARTICLE —

6 ‘‘SECTION 1. Representatives in Congress shall be

7 elected every fourth year. An election of Representatives

8 shall be held on the same day of the year as a Presidential

9 election, except in the case of vacancies in the Representa10 tion of a State or the District constituting the seat of Gov11 ernment of the United States. This section shall apply to

12 an election of Representatives in the year of a Presidential

13 election occurring after the date of ratification of this arti14 cle.

15 ‘‘SECTION 2. Representatives shall be limited to three

16 terms in office, and Senators shall be limited to two terms

17 in office.

18 ‘‘SECTION 3. For purposes of this article, Represent19 atives who have served two years of a term, and Senators

20 who have served three years of a term, are deemed to have

21 served a full term.

22 ‘‘SECTION 4. Section 2 and 3 of this article shall

23 apply to terms of office of Representatives and Senators
3

•HJ 27 IH

1 beginning after the first Presidential election occurring

2 after the date of ratification of this article.’’.

Æ
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tracy MARLER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-30211 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed January 3, 2018

Camille Ann Domingue, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Tracy Marler, Pro Se

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Tracy Marler was convicted by a jury of one count of theft of public funds in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641. Marler collected the Veterans Administration (VA) benefits of Wytonia Herndon after her death in 2008 until 2014, with the total of payments exceeding $100,000. Marler argues that the evidence was insufficient to show that he knew that the money did not belong to him. We review this issue de novo. *United States v. Frye,*489 F.3d 201, 207 (5th Cir. 2007).

To prove the offense of theft of public funds, the Government must show that (1) the money or property at issue belonged to *826the Government and had a value in excess of $1,000, (2) the defendant stole or knowingly converted the money or property to his use or the use of another, and (3) the defendant did so with knowledge that the money or property was not his and with the intent to deprive the owner of its use or benefit either temporarily or permanently. *See*§ 641; *United States v. Dowl,*619 F.3d 494, 601-602 (5th Cir. 2010) (per curiam); *United States v. Dien Duc Huynh,*246 F.3d 734, 745 (6th Cir. 2001). Section 641 requires a demonstration that the defendant knew of non-entitlement or wrongfulness. *United States v. Jones,*664 F.3d 966, 976-77 (5th Cir. 2011).

The evidence presented at trial, viewed in the light most favorable to the Government, would allow the reasonable inference that Marler was aware that the source of the money was not an insurance policy, that the source of the money was Hern-don’s VA benefits, and that alerting the VA of Herndon’s death was contrary to his interests. *See United States v. Terrell,*700 F.3d 766, 760 (6th Cir. 2012) (per curiam). This is sufficient to support a finding that Marler knew he was not entitled to the continuing payments from the VA following Herndon’s death. *See Jones,*664 F.3d at 977. A rational juror could have found that the evidence supported Marler’s conviction for theft of public funds. *See United States v. Vargas-Ocampo,*747 F.3d 299, 301 (5th Cir. 2014) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

NEWS RELEASE                                    For Further Information Contact:
News  10.03                                     Investor Relations: 281-504-4000
                                                    Email: info@harkenenergy.com
                                                            www.harkenenergy.com

                              For Immediate Release

                HARKEN ANNOUNCES FINANCIAL RESULTS FOR YEAR ENDED
                               DECEMBER 31, 2002

     Houston, Texas (March 26, 2003) - Harken Energy Corporation ("Harken")
(AMEX: "HEC") announced today its financial results for the year ended December
31, 2002.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      2001            2002
                                                 -------------    -------------
<S>                                              <C>              <C>
        Total Revenues                           $  32,423,000    $  25,711,000
        Net Loss before Extraordinary Items        (43,998,000)     (13,335,000)
        Net Loss                                   (41,023,000)      (9,807,000)
        Net Loss per Common Share                        (2.45)           (0.64)
        Weighted Average Shares Outstanding         18,063,584       21,742,163
</TABLE>

     Total gas production was 3.225 Bcf for 2002 compared to 3.844 Bcf for 2001
while oil production reached 732,000 barrels for 2002 compared to 773,000 for
2001.

     Based in Houston, Texas, Harken is an oil and gas exploration and
production company whose corporate strategy calls for concentrating its
resources on exploration, development and acquisition of domestic properties in
the Gulf Coast regions of Texas and Louisiana.
# Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali C 114A/28 t

| | ISSN 1977-0987 |
| --- | --- |
| Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali
  tal-Unjoni Ewropea | C 114A |
| | |
| Edizzjoni bil-Malti | Informazzjoni u Avviżi | Volum 6128 ta' Marzu 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0987

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali

tal-Unjoni Ewropea

C 114A

Edizzjoni bil-Malti

Informazzjoni u Avviżi

Volum 6128 ta' Marzu 2018

---

| Avviż Nru | Werrej | Paġna |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Avviżi |
| | PROĊEDURI AMMINISTRATTIVI |
| | Il-Parlament Ewropew |
| 2018/C 114 A/01 | Proċedura ta’ selezzjoni PE/199/S — Aġent Temporanju — Attaché Amministrattiv (AD 5) — Lista ta’ riżerva | 1 |

Avviż Nru

Werrej

Paġna

V   Avviżi

PROĊEDURI AMMINISTRATTIVI

Il-Parlament Ewropew

2018/C 114 A/01

Proċedura ta’ selezzjoni PE/199/S — Aġent Temporanju — Attaché Amministrattiv (AD 5) — Lista ta’ riżerva

1

---

| MT | |
| --- | --- |

MT

---

V Avviżi

PROĊEDURI AMMINISTRATTIVI

Il-Parlament Ewropew

| 28.3.2018 | MT | Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea | CA 114/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2018

MT

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea

CA 114/1

---

PROĊEDURA TA’ SELEZZJONI PE/199/S

Aġent Temporanju — Attaché Amministrattiv (AD 5)

LISTA TA’ RIŻERVA

(2018/C 114 A/01)

| 1. | FISCHER, Jessica Isabell |
| --- | --- |

1.

FISCHER, Jessica Isabell

| 2. | LEMAIRE, Cléo |
| --- | --- |

2.

LEMAIRE, Cléo

| 3. | COURTADE, Christelle |
| --- | --- |

3.

COURTADE, Christelle

Il-validità tal-lista ta’ riżerva se tiskadi fil-31 ta’ Diċembru 2020.

---