alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T!JTOlRNBSY ‘titEXUlEEEAlL 

TEXAS 

Honorable Robert S. Calve& Opinion No. W-667 

Comptroller of Public Accounts 

Capitol Station Re: 

Austin 11, Texas 

Authority of the Comptroller to set aside in 

a separate account, 

$5,000 of moneys appropriated by H.B.No.1, 

Acts 56th Legislature, 

Dear Mr. Calvert: Regular Session, 1959. 

You have requested our opinion 

question: 

on the following 

"Please advise if sufficient authority 

exists in H.S.R. No. 152 for me to set aside 

in a separate account $5,000.00 of the money 

appropriated in House Bill No.1, 56th Legislature, to be used only for the purpose set 

out In the Resolution? 

I'The validity of the resolution, both as 

to Its purpose or the expenditure of State 

Funds to carry out its provisions, is not in 

question." 

House Simple Resolution No. 152, referred to in 

your request, provides in part as follows: 

"RESOLVED, That the sum of Five Thousand 

Dollars ($5,000) is hereby set aside out of 

the Legislative Expense Fund of the Fiftysixth Legislature to defray the expenses of 

the Committee." 

The Legislative Expense Fund of the 56th Legislature was created by the provisions of House Bill No. 1, Acts 

56th Legislature, Regular Session, 1959, Chapter 1, page 1, 

and was appropriated for the purposes of paying legislative 

expenses. House Bill No. 1 authorizes each House to spend 

the moneys appropriated therein independently of the other 

House, and specifically provides that the House and Senate 

shall each publish an itemized account of expenses in its 

own Journal. 
Honorable Robert S. Calvert, page 2. Cm-667) 

Therefore, it is our opinion that the House of 

Representatives is authorized to set aside certain sums of 

money of the Legislative Expense Fund for specific purposes 

without the necessity of the Senate concurring. Since the 

House of Representatives, when acting as a body, does so by 

House Simple Resolution, it is our opinion that the above 

quoted provisions of House Simple Resolution No. 152 constitute sufficient authority for the Comptroller to set aside in 

a separate account $5,000.00 of the moneys appropriated In House 

Bill No. 1, Acts 56th Legislature, Regular Session, 1959, Chapter 1, page 1, to be used only for the purposes set out in 

House Simple Resolution No. 152. 

SUMMARY 

The provisions of House Simple Resolution 

No. 152 constitute sufficient authority 

for the Comptroller to set aside in a 

separate account $5,000.00 of the moneys 

appropriated in House Bill No. 1, Acts 

56th Legislature, Regular Session, 1959, 

Chapter 1, page 1, to be used only for 

the purposes set out in House Simple 

Resolution No. 152. 

Yours very truly, 

WILL WILSON 

Attorney General of Texas 

JR:!& 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE 

Geo. P. Blackburn, Chairman 

Houghton Brownlee, Jr. 

Marietta Payne 

Charles D. Cabaniss 

C. Dean Davis 

Assistant 

REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 

BY: W. V. Geppert
#### David LIBRACE Plaintiff-Appellant v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration Defendant-Appellee

No. 17-2249

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: January 16, 2018

Filed: January 24, 2018

David Librace, Pro Se

Jonathan Ryan Clark, Traci B. Davis, Social Security Administration, Office of General Counsel Region VI, Dallas, TX, *419Stacey E. McCord, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR, for Defendant-Appellee

Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

David Librace appeals from the order of the District Court1 affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits. The only orders properly before this Court on appeal are the orders granting the Commissioner’s motion for relief filed under Rule 60(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and denying Librace’s motion to alter or amend filed under Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. We conclude that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in making those rulings. See Keller v. City of Fremont, 719 F.3d 931, 946 (8th Cir. 2013) (reviewing the district court’s ruling on a Rule 60(a) motion for an abuse of discretion); Sipp v. Astrue, 641 F.3d 975, 981 (8th Cir. 2011) (reviewing the distinct court’s ruling on a Rule 59(e) motion for an abuse of discretion). We affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable D.P. Marshall Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable Patricia S. Harris, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
#### UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Andrew Michael CHRISTENSEN Defendant-Appellant *592United States of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Andrew Michael Christensen Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-2523, No. 17-2524

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: February 15, 2018

Filed: February 27, 2018

John E. Beamer, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Des Moines, IA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Andrew Michael Christensen, Pro Se

Before GRUENDER, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Andrew Christensen directly appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release in two cases and imposed two concurrent revocation sentences of 24 months in prison. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief arguing that Christensen’s supervised-release violation should have been classified as a Grade G violation, rather than a Grade B violation, under Chapter 7 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines; that the revocation sentences exceed the statutory maximum; and that the revocation sentences are unreasonable.

We first conclude that the district court’s classification of Christensen’s violation as a Grade B escape was not error, much less plain error, *see United States v. McGhee,*869 F.3d 703, 705 (8th Cir. 2017) (per curiam) (stating that unobjected-to procedural sentencing errors are forfeited and thus reviewed only for plain error); *United States v. Davis,*825 F.3d 359, 363 (8th Cir. 2016) (discussing plain-error review); U.S.S.G. § 7B1.1(a)(2) (defining Grade B violation); *see also*18 U.S.C. § 751(a) (defining crime of escape and penalties); *United States v. Goad,*788 F.3d 873, 876 (8th Cir. 2015) (concluding that defendant’s unauthorized departure from his residential reentry facility constituted an escape within the meaning of § 751).

We next conclude that the district court did not impose revocation sentences that exceeded the statutory maximum. *See United States v. Lewis,*519 F.3d 822, 824-25 (8th Cir. 2008) (holding that 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) requirement to aggregate revocation prison sentences changed with the April 30, 2003 addition of the phrase “on any such revocation”; where the original offense of conviction was committed thereafter, the plain language of § 3583(e)(3) permits sentencing without considering or aggregating the prison terms for prior revocations); *United States v. Walker,*513 F.3d 891, 893 (8th Cir. 2008) (reviewing legality of sentence *de novo).*

Finally, we conclude that the revocation sentences are not unreasonable. *See United States v. Petreikis,*551 F.3d 822, 824 (8th Cir. 2009) (applying a presumption of substantive reasonableness to revocation sentence within the guidelines range); *United States v. Merrival,*521 F.3d 889, 890 (8th Cir. 2008) (reviewing revocation sentence for an abuse of discretion).

*593In each case, we affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.
Exhibit 35.1  LOGO

Commercial Mortgage Servicing D1050-084, 8th Floor 401 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2015, by and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL
MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor,
CITIBANK N.A., as Certificate Administrator and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-GC27 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise
defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing
Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:  1.
A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018 through
December 31, 2018 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and  2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.  /s/ Leslie HaytonLeslie HaytonManaging DirectorWells Fargo Bank  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

LOGO
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2014-C26, CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-C26

 

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of December 1, 2014 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned,a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as CertificateAdministrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of andfor the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
EX-10.8



 Exhibit 10.8 

AMBIT BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION 

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION POLICY 

On January 8, 2014, the Board, upon recommendation of the Committee, adopted a revised compensation program for the non-employee directors (the “Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy”), effective immediately. The Non-Employee Director
Compensation Policy will apply to each of the Company’s non-employee directors who the Committee determines is eligible to receive compensation under the Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy and may
be amended by the Board at any time. Pursuant to the Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy, each eligible non-employee member of the Board will receive the following cash compensation for Board services, as applicable: 

 

	 	•	 	$40,000 per year for service as a Board member; 

  

	 	•	 	an additional $30,000 per year for service as the Chairman of the Board; 

  

	 	•	 	an additional $15,000 per year for service as the Chairman of the Audit Committee, effective as of the 2014 annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders ($10,000 per year for current term);


  

	 	•	 	an additional $10,000 per year for service as the Chairman of the Compensation Committee; and 

  

	 	•	 	an additional $7,000 per year for service as the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. 


In addition, the Company’s eligible non-employee directors will receive initial and annual, automatic, non-discretionary grants of
nonqualified stock options under the terms and provisions of the Plan. Each eligible non-employee director, upon joining the Board will automatically be granted a non-statutory stock option to purchase 14,000 shares of the Company’s Common
Stock. Each of these initial grants will vest in equal annual installments over a three year period, subject to the director’s continued service with the Company through such dates. On the date of each annual meeting of the Company’s
stockholders, each non-employee director will automatically be granted a non-statutory stock option to purchase 8,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. The annual grants will vest in full on
the one-year anniversary of the date of grant, subject to the director’s continued service through such date. All stock options granted will have a maximum term of 10 years and will vest in full upon the
closing of a change of control transaction.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 22, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-21121

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EDUARDO AGUIRRE,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:02-CR-36-2

--------------------

Before JONES, BARKSDALE and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Eduardo Aguirre appeals from his sentence following his

guilty-plea conviction of aiding and abetting to possess with

intent to distribute 100 kilograms or more of marijuana. Aguirre

argues that, under United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738

(2005), the district court clearly erred in increasing his

sentence by finding by a preponderance of the evidence that he

was responsible for an amount of marijuana beyond the 461

kilograms for which Aguirre admitted responsibility. 
No. 03-21121

-2-

 It is not necessary to consider Aguirre’s Booker argument

because, as the Government argues, Aguirre’s sentence should be

vacated and the matter remanded for resentencing based on our

holdings in four of Aguirre’s co-indictees’ appeals that the

district court clearly erred in basing its findings of drug

quantity on the statements of an informant who the Government had

identified as unreliable. See United States v. Ayala, 107 Fed.

Appx. 410 (5th Cir. 2004)(unpublished); United States v. Trevino,

125 Fed. Appx. 549 (5th Cir. 2005)(unpublished). There is no

reason to reach a different result in Aguirre’s case, and

Aguirre’s sentence is VACATED and the matter REMANDED remand for

further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Because we

have vacated Aguirre’s sentence, we do not consider Aguirre’s

arguments pertaining to the denial of a reduction in his offense

level for acceptance of responsibility or that his sentence

should be reversed because the Government breached its plea

agreement. We GRANT the appellee’s unopposed motion to seal the

appellee’s brief. 

SENTENCE VACATED AND THE MATTER REMANDED; MOTION TO SEAL

APPELLEE’S BRIEF GRANTED.
Exhibit 32

Certification of Chief Executive Officer  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
officer of Alliance Imaging, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:



Dated: August 8, 2008/s/PAUL S. VIVIANOPaul S. Viviano
Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer


---



Certification of Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
officer of Alliance Imaging, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:



Dated: August 8, 2008/s/HOWARD K. AIHARAHoward K. Aihara
Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
# 3 O I 

### c 

# s O 

## o p 

# r O

jiy . 

### O 

# P AI R OPERATO R CERTIFICAT E (AO C INGLES )

L O I—C^ -

- _I J 

## "-c :

V , 

# O r\

PASJRIA N CESPEDE

S ! o inspecto r ransporte Pflfalico — ACTUAUZACIO N N " 04/0 8 LA N CARG O S^ . _LHIL h RINCIPA L D E 0PERACI6 N 7f FECHA : 0 2 D E JULI O DE L 200 8 PAGINAO ^

# uil l

y~j p 3 « U l mgc o 

# I I 

# o 

# I i O 

# o 

# S « O (

D .£ « - ^ « f 

### c r m> 

# 2 §) gCERTIFICAT E Th e CM L AERONAUTI C BOAR D o fChil e hereb yceriifie s tha t LA N CARG O S.A . i s a Chilea n oompan ydul ydesignate d b ythi s aeronautica l authorit yt o operat e (1 ) th e schedule d foreig n ai rtransportatio n o f propertyan d mai l fro m point s behin d Chil e vi a Chil e an d intermediat e point s t o a poin t o rpoint s i n th e Unite d State s o f Americ a an d beyond ; an d (2 ) th e schedule d foreig n ai rtransportatio n o fpropert yan d mai l betwee n th e Unite d State s o fAmeric a an d an ypoin t o rpoints ; th e aforementione d i n accordanc e wit h th e Ai rTransportatio n Agreemen t currentl yi n forc e betwee n th e governmen t o f Chil e an d th e Unite d State s o fAmerica .

. Jaim e pnde rRosa s

I Secretar

y iTonauti cBoar d

Santiago , Septembe r27,201 1LAN CARG O S.A .
Ke yManagemen t Positio n Held , Nam e (Countryo f Citizenship ) CEO , Cristia n Uret a (Chilean ) Federic o German ! (Argentinian ] V P o f Business Development , Ernest o Ramire z (Unite d States ) Senio rVP o f Sale

s an d Marketing , Alvar o Carri l (Chile ) V P Network , Andre s Bianch i (Chile ) Director s Nam e (Countryo f Citizenship ) Jos e Co xDonos o (Chilean ) Ignaci o Cuet o Plaza (Chilean ) Jua n Jos ^ Cuet o Plaz

a (Chilean ) Ramo n Eble m Kadi s (Chilean ) Enriqu e Cuet o Plaz

a (Chilean )CERTIFICAT E

I , Federic o German! , CO O o f LA N CARG O S.A . (th e "Company" ) hereb ycertif / tha t accordin g t o th e Shareholder s Registr yo fth e Company , th e curren t owner s o fth e Compan yare : INVERSIONE S LA N S.A. : 0,0041 %

INVERSIONE S SANT

ACECILI AS.A. : 0,0706 % LA N AIRLINE S S.A. : 99,8939 % I hereb yals o certif ytha t Inversione s La n S.A . an d LA N Airline s S.A . ar e Chilea n companie s dul yincorporate d unde rth e law s o fth e Republi co fChile . Miami , Novembe r4 , 201 1

^ o German ! ) 0 La n Carg o S.A .
No. 11-9998.

#### Allums *v.*Phillips et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 01476

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

x 01476\01476_012611 Communication.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

x 01476\01476_012811 Communication.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

x 01476\01476_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

01476\01476_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 01476\01476_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01476\01476_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01476\01476_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01476\01476_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01476\01476_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01476\Calculations_Plant ID 01476.doc EPA technical review notes

01476\Certification Statement Plant ID 01476.pdf Plant certification statement

x 01476\Questions for Plant ID 01476.docx Draft Questions for Follow Up

01476\Supplemental Documents\01476_BED ASH 1 BLOCK DIAGRAM (2).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

01476\Supplemental Documents\01476_BED ASH 2 BLOCK DIAGRAM (2).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x x 01476\Supplemental Documents\01476_CH2MHill_CWTS_Study.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

01476\Supplemental Documents\01476_EIS DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY STUDY.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

01476\Supplemental Documents\01476_FLY ASH 1 BLOCK DIAGRAM (2).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

01476\Supplemental Documents\01476_FLY ASH 2 BLOCK DIAGRAM (4).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x x 01476\Supplemental Documents\01476_Map1.ppt Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01476\Supplemental Documents\01476_Water Balance 1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01476\Supplemental Documents\01476_WWT, POND-1 block diagrams.pdf

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1993
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1993
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>