alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### IN RE: Willie James ASBURY, Petitioner.

No. 17-2135

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 29, 2018

Decided: February 8, 2018

Willie James Asbury, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Willie James Asbury petitions this court for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order compelling the Clerk of Court to construe his pleading challenging the court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2012) motion as a Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion rather than as a petition for rehearing. Asbury argues that the Clerk violated her ministerial duties by refusing to file his motion as a motion for reconsideration, contending that this denied him access to courts.

“Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be invoked only in extraordinary situations.” *United States v. Moussaoui,*333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003) (internal quotation *721marks omitted). To obtain mandamus relief, a petitioner must establish that:

> (1) he has a clear and indisputable right to the relief sought; (2) the responding party has a clear duty to do the specific act requested; (3) the act requested is an official act or duty; (4) there are no other adequate means to attain the desired relief; and (5) the issuance of the writ will effect right and justice in the circumstances.

*In re Braxton,*258 F.3d 250, 261 (4th Cir. 2001). Asbury’s petition has not established that he has a clear right to the relief he seeks. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED*
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CPS Technologies Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three month and six month periods ended June 26, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Grant C. Bennett, President and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:	August 9, 2010
/s/	Grant C. Bennett
Grant C. Bennett
President and Treasurer
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 13,
2015 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2015-1 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes
by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used
herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate
Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|    |  |                                         |  |                      
|--- |  | --------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Connie Coffey                       |  | Dated: March 15, 2017
|    |  | Connie Coffey                           |  |                      
|    |  | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |                      
|    |  | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |
#### COM. v. WILLIAMS, N., Jr.

452 MDA 2014

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/07/2017

CP-22-CR-0001173-2004 (Dauphin)

Affirmed
2022 EAVS Data Brief: Missouri EAVS Jurisdictions:

116 

 Voter Registration 

Active Reg. Voters as of Nov. 8, 20221 

3,816,663 

Reg. Forms Received2* 

435,511 

Total Confirmation Notices Sent3* 

715,685 

Voters Removed from Reg. Rolls4* 

468,943 

Source of Registration Applications5 

Motor Vehicle Dept. 64.9% 

Online 17.8% 

Mail, Email, Fax 7.9% 

In Person 6.2% 

Other 3.1% 

 Voting and Turnout 

Voters Participating By Mode6 

7 Turnout 

49.3% In-Person 

Election Day 

1,834,916 

79.6% 

Mail 

278,539 

12.1% 

In-Person 

Early 

184,687 

8.0% 

Other 

6,108 

0.3% 

Total Voting Locations8: 2,281 

Total Poll Workers9: 15,759 

Election Technology 

Percentage of Jurisdictions Using...10 

94.8% 

Ballot 

Marking 

Devices 

93.1% 

Scanners 

73.3% 

Electronic 

Poll 

Books 

1.7% 

DREs with 

VVPAT 

0.9% 

Hand 

Counting 

0.0% 

DREs w/o 

VVPAT 

 Mail Ballots 

• 290,428 mail ballots transmitted11 

• 96.9% of transmitted mail ballots returned by voters12 

• 98.9% of returned mail ballots counted13 

• 1.1% of returned mail ballots rejected14 

• Did not conduct all-mail election15 

• Did not allow drop boxes16 

• Did not allow ballot curing17 

 Election Audits18 

-- Access audit 

-- Ballot design audit 

Ballot reconciliation -- audit 

Compliance/ -- procedural audit 

-- Eligibility audit 

-- Legal audit 

Logic and accuracy ✔ testing 

Post-election ✔ tabulation audit 

-- Other 

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at www.eac.gov 

/research-and-data/datasets-codebooks-and-surveys. 

Responses of “Does not apply,” “Data not available,” and “Valid 

skip” are shown as zeroes or dashes. Percentages may not sum 

to 100% because of missing data or rounding. 

* Close of registration for 2020 

general election to close of 

registration for 2022 general 

election. 

1 A1b of EAVS. 

2 A3a of EAVS. 

3 A8a of EAVS. 

4 A9a of EAVS. 

5 Mail, Email, Fax is A4a/A3a. 

In Person is A4b/A3a. Online is 

A4c/A3a. Motor Vehicle Dept. is 

A4d/A3a. Other is the sum of 

A4e–A4l/A3a. May not sum to 

100% because of missing data. 

6 In-Person Election Day is F1b. 

Mail is F1d+F1g. In-Person Early 

is F1f. Other is F1c+F1e+F1h. 

7 F1a of EAVS divided by citizen 

voting age population (CVAP). 

8 D2a of EAVS. 

9 D7a of EAVS. 

10 F3a–f, F5a–F9a of EAVS; 

number of jurisdictions that 

responded “Yes” divided by

number of jurisdictions in 

state/territory. 

11 C1a of EAVS. 

12 C1b/C1a of EAVS. 

13 C8a/C1b of EAVS. 

14 C9a/C1b of EAVS. 

15 Q17 and Q17a of Policy 

Survey. 

16 Q19 of Policy Survey. 

17 Q20 of Policy Survey. 

18 Q36 of Policy Survey. See 

survey questionnaire for full 

definitions of each type of 

audit.
# Official Journal L 111/2 Ma

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 111 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 482 May 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 111

English edition

Legislation

Volume 482 May 2005

---

| Contents | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | European Central Bank |
| | * | Guideline of the European Central Bank of 3 February 2005 amending Guideline ECB/2000/7 on monetary policy instruments and procedures of the Eurosystem (ECB/2005/2) | 1 |

Contents

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

page

European Central Bank

*

Guideline of the European Central Bank of 3 February 2005 amending Guideline ECB/2000/7 on monetary policy instruments and procedures of the Eurosystem (ECB/2005/2)

(ECB/2005/2)

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 292 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 292

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 10, 1998

      Received and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Calling for an end to the recent conflict between Eritrea and Ethiopia, 
                        and for other purposes.

Whereas the 1991 ouster of the Mengistu dictatorship led to relative peace and 
        stability in Eritrea and Ethiopia;
Whereas in 1993 Eritrea became independent after an internationally supervised 
        referendum and the Government of Ethiopia accepted the result of the 
        referendum;
Whereas the Governments of Eritrea and Ethiopia have worked closely on a wide 
        range of issues over the past several years;
Whereas the Governments of Eritrea and Ethiopia enjoy warm relations with the 
        United States;
Whereas on May 6, 1998, a military confrontation erupted between Eritrea and 
        Ethiopia, resulting in the deaths of hundreds of innocent civilians and 
        the displacement of tens of thousands of people;
Whereas the peoples of Eritrea and Ethiopia have suffered for decades due to war 
        and manmade famines and do not deserve once again to suffer due to armed 
        conflict;
Whereas the conflict between Eritrea and Ethiopia could destabilize the entire 
        subregion and lead to a massive humanitarian crisis;
Whereas the Governments of Eritrea and Ethiopia have both stated that they are 
        committed to a peaceful resolution of the conflict; and
Whereas the Governments of the United States and Rwanda, as well as countries in 
        the region, have put forth proposals for resolving the conflict: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) calls on both Eritrea and Ethiopia immediately to bring 
        an end to the violence between the two countries;
            (2) commends the executive branch of the United States 
        Government for brokering a moratorium on air raids between 
        Eritrea and Ethiopia;
            (3) commends the recent efforts of the United States 
        facilitation team to resolve the crisis, and encourages 
        continued United States engagement toward a peaceful resolution 
        of the conflict; and
            (4) calls on President Isaias Afewerki and Prime Minister 
        Meles Zenawi to end the conflict peacefully before it escalates 
        into a full-scale war.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 9, 1998.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Golden River Resources
Corporation (the "Company") for the three months ended September 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"report"), the undersigned, Peter Lee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1)  The report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date:     November 14, 2006

                                        /s/Peter Lee
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Peter Lee
                                        Director, Secretary and
                                        Chief Financial Officer


                                                                              22
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Recent News & Stories             
  -  News Releases             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## ArticleCS - Dashboard

VIEW BIO

VIEW BIO

VIEW BIO

VIEW BIO

## GoogleTranslate

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996             SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,460                   1,460
<SECURITIES>                                     1,025                   1,025
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,033                   2,033
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (215)                   (215)
<INVENTORY>                                        816                     816
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,633                   5,633
<PP&E>                                           3,324                   3,324
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (2,067)                 (2,067)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,581                   7,581
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,216                   4,216
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,813                   1,813
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        14,041                  14,041
<OTHER-SE>                                     (12,710)                (12,710)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,581                   7,581
<SALES>                                          2,095                   6,717
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,707                   8,702
<CGS>                                              968                   3,308
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,322                   4,444
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,979                   6,251
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     3                      50
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  29                      63
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (689)                 (1,920)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       4
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (689)                 (1,924)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (689)                 (1,924)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.12)                  (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.12)                  (0.34)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 4.6







    	1 



    	 



    






    	2 



    	 



    






    	3 



    	 



    






    	4 



    	 



    






    	5
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>           BD
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from the financial statements for The
Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. for the 3 months ended
March 31, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         179,233
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,997,632
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                            2,077
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            329,124
<PP&E>                                         227,050
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,912,286
<SHORT-TERM>                                   388,169
<PAYABLES>                                   1,338,484
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                             31,540
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                              22,717
<LONG-TERM>                                    292,396
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     520,154
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,912,286
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                    0
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                            47,982
<COMMISSIONS>                                  457,115
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                   11,603
<FEE-REVENUE>                                   61,179
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,321
<COMPENSATION>                                 334,151
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 68,537
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      68,537
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    68,537
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
No. 11-1500.

#### Stanley *v.*United States.

C. A. Armed Forces. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-9849.

#### Narvaez *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: R. WAYNE JOHNSON,

 Relator.

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00162-CV

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF

MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus 

against the Honorable Bonnie Rangel, Judge of the 171st District Court of El Paso County, 

Texas, and concludes that Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus should be dismissed. We 

therefore dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus, in accordance with the opinion of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2015.

STEVEN L. HUGHES, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.