alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY: Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Sunshine Act notice; Notice of public meeting agenda.

SUMMARY: Public Meeting: U.S. Election Assistance Commission Standards Board 2024

Annual Meeting.

DATES: Wednesday, April 17, 2024 9:00 AM - 4:30 PM Central and Thursday, April 18, 2024

9:00 AM - 11:45 AM Central.

ADDRESSES:

The Fontaine hotel, 901 W. 48th Place, Kansas City, Missouri 64112.

The meeting is open to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kristen Muthig, Telephone: (202) 897-9285, Email: kmuthig@eac.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Purpose: In accordance with the Government in the Sunshine Act (Sunshine Act), Public Law 

94-409, as amended (5 U.S.C. 552b), the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) will 

conduct an annual meeting of the EAC Standards Board to conduct regular business, discuss 

EAC updates and upcoming programs, and discuss other relevant election topics.

Agenda: The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) Standards Board will hold their 2024 

Annual Meeting to conduct regular business and discuss communications, lessons from the 

presidential primaries, the impact of artificial intelligence on elections and mitigation tactics, and 

looking forward to the general election. This meeting will include a question and answer 

discussion between board members and EAC staff. 
Board members will also review FACA Board membership guidelines and policies with EAC 

Acting General Counsel and receive a general update about the EAC programing.

The EAC will only accept written comments and questions from members of the public. If you 

would like to participate, please email clearinghouse@eac.gov with your full name and question 

or comment no later than 5:00 p.m. Central Time on April 17, 2024.

Background: HAVA designates a 110-member Standards Board to assist EAC in carrying out its 

mandates under the law. The board consists of 55 state election officials selected by their 

respective chief state election official, and 55 local election officials selected through a process 

supervised by the chief state election official.

The full agenda will be posted in advance on the EAC website: 

https://www.eac.gov/events/2024/04/17/2024-eac-standards-board-annual-meeting.

STATUS:

This meeting will be open to the public.

Camden Kelliher,

Acting General Counsel, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applied Imaging Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Carl Hull, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |     |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 12, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Carl Hull          
|                      |  |     |  | Carl Hull              
|                      |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer



This certification
accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Inalves Gonzalez DELGADO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-13191 Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(January 16, 2018)

Michael B. Billingsley, Jenny Lynn Smith, U.S. Attorney Service — Northern District of Alabama, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee

Inalves Gonzalez Delgado, Pro Se

Before MARCUS, JULIE CARNES and HULL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

P. Russell Steen, appointed counsel for Inalves Gonzalez-Delgado in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 *671L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gonzalez-Delgado’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | CMBS Department

 

MAC N9401-011

1055 10th Avenue SE

Minneapolis, MN 55414 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2014-C19, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C19

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2014 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

March 1, 2016

/s/ Gail Vannest

GAIL VANNEST

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       9,673,382
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,441,682
<ALLOWANCES>                                   150,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,225,585
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,479,282
<PP&E>                                      47,308,393
<DEPRECIATION>                              26,219,366
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,645,106
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,069,712
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        54,553
<OTHER-SE>                                  36,859,447
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,645,106
<SALES>                                     14,553,469
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,553,469
<CGS>                                       12,338,196
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,338,196
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (166,140)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,406,878
<INCOME-TAX>                                   450,201
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            956,677
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   956,677
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40271

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JEFFERY CHARLES BELL,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:97CR19-3

- - - - - - - - - -

December 9, 1998

Before DAVIS, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jeffery Charles Bell appeals from his sentence following his

guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute

cocaine base. Bell argues that the district court clearly erred

in applying U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1) for possession of a firearm. 

Section 2D1.1(b)(1) should be applied if a firearm was present

during a drug offense, unless it is clearly improbable that the

firearm was not connected with the offense. § 2D1.1, comment.

(n.3). The determination that a defendant possessed a firearm
No. 98-40271

-2-

pursuant to § 2D1.1(b)(1) is a factual finding, which is reviewed

for clear error. United States v. Vital, 68 F.3d 114, 119 (5th

Cir. 1995).

The Government may prove that the defendant personally

possessed a weapon for purposes of § 2B1.1(b)(1) by showing a

temporal and spatial relationship between the weapon, the

proscribed activity, and the defendant. United States v. Ramos,

71 F.3d 1150, 1157 (5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1227

(1996). The search of Bell’s residence revealed a firearm in the

same room as the cocaine base. This search was conducted on the

same day that Bell sold cocaine base to a DEA informant. The

district court did not clearly err in applying § 2D1.1(b)(1) in

calculating Bell’s sentence.

AFFIRMED.
No. 11-10383.

#### Devo *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
No. 11-10414.

#### Garza *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
IA

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 123

To disapprove the rule submitted by the Health Care Financing Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, on June 1, 1998,

relating to surety bond requirements for home health agencies under

the Medicare and Medicaid Programs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 17, 1998

Mr. NUSSLE (for himself, Mr. WATKINS, and Mr. TALENT) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways

and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Commerce, for a period

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee

concerned

JOINT RESOLUTION

To disapprove the rule submitted by the Health Care Financing Administration, Department of Health and Human

Services, on June 1, 1998, relating to surety bond requirements for home health agencies under the Medicare

and Medicaid Programs.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the

4 Health Care Financing Administration, Department of

5 Health and Human Services, on June 1, 1998 (volume
2

•HJ 123 IH

1 63, number 104, page 29648 of the Federal Register), re2 lating to surety bond requirements for home health agen3 cies under the medicare and medicaid programs, and such

4 rule shall have no force or effect.

Æ
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 13-1851

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Elpidio Paz-Camarena

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________

 Submitted: November 18, 2013

 Filed: December 19, 2013

[Unpublished]

 ____________

Before SHEPHERD, BOWMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Elpidio Paz-Camarena appeals his fifty-one month sentence following his plea

of guilty to illegal reentry subsequent to an aggravated felony conviction in violation

of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). Authorities and immigration officials discovered

Paz-Camarena when he was arrested in June 2012 for assault in Kansas City,
Missouri. The presentence investigation report, accepted by the district court

1

without objection from Paz-Camarena, recommended a forty-one to fifty-one month

United States Sentencing Guidelines range. The district court noted the Guidelines

range, discussed the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and focused specifically

on Paz-Camarena's relatively short sentence for the prior felony conviction for

attempted statutory rape. The district court ultimately sentenced Paz-Camarena to the

top of the range, fifty-one months. Paz-Camarena argues on appeal that thissentence

was substantively unreasonable because it is greater than necessary to satisfy the

statutory goals ofsentencing. He also argues that the district court procedurally erred

by not articulating an explanation of the fifty-one month sentence.

We have reviewed the record and find the district court did not abuse its

considerable discretion in sentencing Paz-Camarena to the presumptively reasonable

within-range sentence of fifty-one months. See United States v. Pappas, 715 F.3d

225, 229-30 (8th Cir. 2013) (standard of review, presumption). Further, as PazCamarena did not object to the district court's alleged procedural error, we review for

plain error and find no error, plain or otherwise. See United States v. Hoffman, 707

F.3d 929, 937 (8th Cir. 2013) (plain error standard of review). In fact, the district

court articulated a rather extensive explanation of its reason for arriving at the fiftyone month sentence. Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________

The Honorable Beth Phillips, United States District Judge for the Western 1

District of Missouri.

-2-
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                    Significant Subsidiaries of Dynegy Inc.
                            As of December 31, 2002


SUBSIDIARY                                       STATE OF INCORPORATION

1. Dynegy Holdings Inc.                          Delaware
2. Illinova Corporation                          Illinois
3. Dynegy Marketing and Trade                    Colorado
4. Dynegy Power Marketing, Inc.                  Texas
5. Illinois Power Company                        Illinois
6. NNG Holding Company, Inc.                     Delaware
7. Dynegy Northeast Generation, Inc.             Delaware
8. Dynegy Midwest Generation, Inc.               Illinois
9. Dynegy Catlin Member                          Delaware
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6700** 

WAYNE RESPER , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v.
SECRETARY, DPSCS; OAKLEY IGO; COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTIONS , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. ( 8:13

- cv
- 03431

- PJM )

Submitted : November 18, 2014 Decided: November 20, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Wayne Resper, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Wayne Resper appeals the district court ’ s order s dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (20 12 ) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (20 12 ) and denying his motion for

reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) . We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Resper v.
Secretary, DPSCS , No. 8:13

- cv
- 03431

- PJM (D. Md. Jan. 28 &
Apr. 17, 2014) . We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before th is court and argument would not aid the

d ecisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Brian T. Stevens, certify that: 1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Mercedes-Benz Auto Lease Trust 2015-A (the "Exchange Act periodic reports"); 2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  U.S. Bank, National Association, as Indenture Trustee. Date:  March 22, 2016          /s/ Brian T. Stevens                                            Name: Brian T. Stevens Title: Vice President and Controller                             (senior officer of Servicer in charge of servicing function)
# Amtsblatt C 117A/3. A

| | ISSN 1977-088X |
| --- | --- |
| Amtsblatt
  der Europäischen Union | C 117A |
| | |
| Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache | Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen | 61. Jahrgang3. April 2018 |

ISSN 1977-088X

Amtsblatt

der Europäischen Union

C 117A

Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache

Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen

61. Jahrgang3. April 2018

---

| Informationsnummer | Inhalt | Seite |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Bekanntmachungen |
| | VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN |
| | Europäisches Amt für Personalauswahl (EPSO) |
| 2018/C 117 A/01 | Addendum zu der Reserveliste — Allgemeines Auswahlverfahren EUIPO/AST/02/17 — Beamte (m/w) der Funktionsgruppe Assistenz (AST 3) im Bereich geistiges Eigentum | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Inhalt

Seite

V   Bekanntmachungen

VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN

Europäisches Amt für Personalauswahl (EPSO)

2018/C 117 A/01

Addendum zu der Reserveliste — Allgemeines Auswahlverfahren EUIPO/AST/02/17 — Beamte (m/w) der Funktionsgruppe Assistenz (AST 3) im Bereich geistiges Eigentum

1

---

| DE | |
| --- | --- |

DE

---

V Bekanntmachungen

VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN

Europäisches Amt für Personalauswahl (EPSO)

| 3.4.2018 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | CA 117/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2018

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

CA 117/1

---

ADDENDUM ZU DER RESERVELISTE

Allgemeines Auswahlverfahren EUIPO/AST/02/17

Beamte (m/w) der Funktionsgruppe Assistenz (AST 3) im Bereich geistiges Eigentum

(2018/C 117 A/01)

| DE LA CUEVA CARABINE | Samantha |
| --- | --- |

DE LA CUEVA CARABINE

Samantha

Dieses Addendum gilt bis zum 30. Juni 2021.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 32.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of The Jones Financial Companies,
L.L.L.P. on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
James D. Weddle, Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, certify to the
best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Partnership.

                                   /s/  James D. Weddle
                                   ---------------------------------------
                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                   The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P.
                                   August 11, 2006

                                     27
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 40 (Friday, February 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 9234]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5042]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart Q During 
the Week Ending February 21, 1997

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
Q of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (See 14 
CFR 302.1701 et seq.). The due date for Answers, Conforming 
Applications, or Motions to modify Scope are set forth below for each 
application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: OST-97-2144.
    Date filed: February 21, 1997.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: March 21, 1997.
    Description: Application of Airline Management Limited, pursuant to 
49 U.S.C. Section 41301 and Subpart Q of the Regulations, applies for a 
foreign air carrier permit to engage in charter foreign air 
transportation of persons and property as follows: Between any point or 
points in the United Kingdom and any point or points in the United 
States, either directly or via intermediate or beyond points in other 
countries, with or without stopovers; Between any point or points in 
the United States and any point or points not in the United Kingdom or 
the United States; and any other charter flights authorized pursuant to 
Part 212 of the Department's regulations.
Paulette V. Twine,
Chief, Documentary Services.
[FR Doc. 97-5042 Filed 2-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
No. 11-9768.

#### Blackmon *v.*Douglas, Warden.

C. A. 11th Cir. Motion of petitioner to defer consideration of petition for writ of certiorari denied. Certiorari denied.