alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8427 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8427

 To provide for certain reports on enrollment in the Lifeline program, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 2020

Mrs. Luria (for herself, Ms. Spanberger, and Mr. Riggleman) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for certain reports on enrollment in the Lifeline program, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ensuring Phone and Internet Access 
for SNAP Recipients Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. REPORTS ON ENROLLMENT IN LIFELINE PROGRAM.

    (a) Annual Report on Enrollment in Lifeline Program by SNAP 
Participants.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of 
this Act, and each year thereafter, the Commission, in consultation 
with the Secretary of Agriculture, shall submit to Congress a report on 
enrollment in the Lifeline program by individuals participating in the 
supplemental nutrition assistance program established under the Food 
and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.).
    (b) Study and Report on Enrollment in Lifeline Program.--Not later 
than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Commission 
shall conduct a study and submit to Congress a report on--
            (1) projections of the number of new broadband service 
        consumers who will join the Lifeline program through Federal 
        assistance programs during the 5-year period following the 
        conclusion of the study; and
            (2) the efficacy of various efforts to advertise the 
        Lifeline program, including data illustrating the effect of 
        such efforts on enrollment in such program.
    (c) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Broadband service.--The term ``broadband service'' has 
        the meaning given the term ``broadband internet access 
        service'' in section 8.1(b) of title 47, Code of Federal 
        Regulations, or any successor regulation.
            (2) Commission.--The term ``Commission'' means the Federal 
        Communications Commission.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.4



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13A-14(A) AND 15D-14(A), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Brian P. Lupien, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Till Capital Ltd.; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 27, 2017





|By: | /s/ Brian P. Lupien     | 
|--- | ----------------------- | 
|    | Brian P. Lupien         | 
|    | Chief Financial Officer |
#### S.M.B. v. J.M.K.

1810 WDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/07/2017

PACSES Case Number: 651109912

(Mercer)

Appeal Dismissed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CHILDREN'S COMPREHENSIVE SERVICES, INC. FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,593
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,103
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,520
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,126
<PP&E>                                          60,196
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,756
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  98,072
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,599
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            74
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,682
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    98,072
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                82,714
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                75,597
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,174
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,390
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,524
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,866
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,866
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.51
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.2(d)

Agreement No. INSAT-ST2 / Ku / DTH / 01 / 2012

Dated April 19, 2012

Amendment No. 4 dated April 15, 2015

(Extension of Service Period)

Whereas DOS entered into an Agreement No. INSAT-ST2 / Ku / DTH / 01 / 2012 dated April 19, 2012 with Videocon d2h Limited for the
provision of 10X54 MHz of Ku band space segment on INSAT-ST2 system for meeting its Direct-to-Home requirement; an Amendment No. 1 revising the terms of Agreement in so far as Allocation of additional 2X54 MHz on INSAT-ST2 system was entered
into on June 19, 2013, an Amendment No. 2 revising the terms of Agreement in so far as Change of name of Customer, Company registered office address and Correspondence address was entered into on July 01, 2014 and an Amendment
No. 3 revising the terms of Agreement in so far as Extension of Service Period was entered into on March 01, 2015.

AND NOW WHEREAS the term of
the agreement is expiring on April 14, 2015 and the parties are desirous of extending the term for a further term of forty five days, to end on 31 May 2015.

Accordingly, both the parties in consideration of the mutual covenants in the original Agreement have now agreed to amend the Agreement with effect from
April 15, 2015 as under;



|1. | The definition of Service Period in Article 1 (Definitions) of the Amendment No. 3 to the Principal agreement shall be deleted in its entirely and replaced with the following new
definition:
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Service period means the period(s) for which the CUSTOMER must acquire Capacity on the respective
Transponder, commencing from the Commencement date of Services until 31 May 2015



|2. | Article 2c. Transponder capacity of the Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement shall be replaced with CUSTOMER and DOS agree that DOS make the Capacity available to CUSTOMER on a 24-hour, seven-days-per-week
basis, for a period until May 31, 2015.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------



|                                         |  |  |  |                                     |  |     
|---------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------- |  | ----
|For and On behalf of DEPARTMENT OF
SPACE |  |  |  | For and On behalf of CUSTOMER       |  | LOGO
|LOGO                                     |  |  |  | LOGO                                | 
|LOGO                                     |  |  |  | Authorised signatory Date
15/4/2015 | 
|                                         |  |  |  |
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Lonnie Lee ROTENBERRY, also known as “Throwed Off”, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-11546 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 23, 2018

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Lonnie Lee Rotenberry, Pro Se

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Lonnie Lee Rotenberry has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rotenberry has filed a response. We have reviewed the *Anders*briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Rotenberry’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
_ - 

ENERGY ~~.'11 

Via Regulalions.gov 

July 6, 2015 

U.S. Department Of Transportation . 

Docket Operations 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W 12-140 

Washington, DC 20590-0001 

Re: Petition for Amendment to Exemption No. 11224 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0633 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

NextEra Energy, Inc. ("NextEra") hereby requests amendment t0 its Exemption NO. 11224 

("Exemption") issued by the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") on Marcli 24, 2015 to 

authorize operations using the DJI Phantom 3 Professional. NextEra's existing Exemption 

authorizes operation using the DJI PllantOm 2 VlslOn PlLls, DJI Inspire I(T600), aild DJI S900 

when weighing less than 55 pounds including payload, and states that proposed operations of any 

other aircraft require a new petition Or petition to amend this grant. 

1. llescription of nir-ci•aft Vlal:e ancf Z/Ic clel 

NextEra proposes to add the DJI Pliantom 3 Professioiial to its authorized operations. This craft 

is small (gross weight Of 1280 Grams, 2. 82 pOLlnds) and llas a max1111L1111 speed Of 16 mis, 

31.1knots. The FAA previously approved the use of the DJI Phantom 3 Professional by Flite 

Video LLC in Exemption 11583, Regulatory Docket FAA -2015-0453, finding that "the 

enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned aircraft (UA) with the specifications described by 

the petitioner and carrying no passengers ol• crew, ratlher than a manned aircraft of significantly 

greater proportions, carrying crew in addition to flamniable fuel, gives the FAA good cause to 

find that the UAS operation enabled by this exemption is in the public interest." NextEra 

requests that the FAA find that the use of the DJI Phantom 3 Professional is in thc public 111terest 

in this case for these same reasons. 

2. Supporting Materials 

The following user guide is providecl in Appendix A: 

[Phantom 3 Professional User Manual, Version 1.2] 

NextEra will follow the same safety checklists, sUAS operator training, and Otlier Operating 

conditions that apply t0 the three craft prcviously approved for operatioii. Upoti FAA approval 

NextEra Energy, Inc. 

700 Universe Boulevard, Juno Beach, FL 33408 
NextEra Petition for Amendment of Exemption No. 1 1224 

July 6, 2015 

Page 2 

of this Petition for Amendment, NextEra will update its Field Operations Manuals, Checklists, 

and related documents to include DJI Phantom 3 Professional -speclflc lllfornZatlon . 

I hope that you find the above information helpful in processing NextEra's Petition for 

Amendment. Please feel free to contact nle at 561-694-4486 or mgodwln@nee.com should you 

need additional information or have any questions. 

Best regards, 

~ 

t71C) I 

~ 

Mark Godwin 

IT Master Architect 

NextEra Energy, Inc. 

700 Universe Boulevard, Juno Beach, FL 33408
Total Polling Locations:

Election Day:7 767 

Early Voting:8 161 

Mail Ballots Transmitted10 Mail Ballots Returned11

3,529,586 2,938,896 (83.3% of 

transmitted) 

Mail Ballots Counted12 Mail Ballots Rejected13

2,931,164 (99.7% of 

returned)

7,732 (0.3% of 

returned) 

Mail Voting Policies 

No excuse is required for mail voting14

Does not conduct all-mail elections15

Any voter can register as permanent absentee16

EAVS Jurisdictions

15 

Total Registered Voters as of 

Nov. 3, 20201

4,728,109 

Registration Forms Received2*

2,943,553 

Total Confirmation Notices Sent3*

2,480,620 

2020 EAVS Data Brief: Arizona

 Voter Registration

1.0%

9.5%

9.6%

34.7%

45.2%

In-Person

Mail, Email, Fax

Other

Motor Vehicle Dept.

Online

Source of Registration Applications4

 Voter Turnout  Election Technology

In-Person 

Election 

Day Voters 

371,565

Mail Voters 10.9%

2,931,175

85.7%

In-Person 

Early Voters 

69,063

2.0%

Other Mode 

48,678

1.4%

Voters Participating By Mode5

15

14

13

2

1

0

Electronic

Poll

Books

Ballot

Marking

Device

Scanner DRE with

VVPAT

Hand

Count

DRE w/o

VVPAT

Technology Used by Jurisdictions9

 Mail Balloting

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at www.eac.gov. 

The data shown are certified as final by state election authorities. 

Responses of “Does not apply,” “Data not available, ” and “Valid 

skip” are shown as zeroes or dashes. Percentages may not sum to 

100% because of missing data or rounding. 

* Close of registration for 2018 

general election to close of 

registration for 2020 general 

election. 

1 A1a of EAVS. 

2 A3a of EAVS. 

3 A8a of EAVS. 

4 Mail, Email, Fax is A4a. InPerson is A4b. Online is A4c. 

Motor Vehicle Dept. is A4d. 

Other is the sum of A4e–A4l. 

Denominator is A3a. 

5 In-Person Election Day Voters 

is F1b. Mail Voters is F1d+F1g. 

In-Person Early Voters is F1f. 

Other Mode is F1c+F1e+F1h. 

Denominator is sum of F1b–

F1h. 

6 F1a of EAVS. Denominator 

is citizen voting age 

population (CVAP). 

7 D3a of EAVS. 

8 D4a of EAVS. 

9 F3a–d, F5a, F6a, F7a, F8a, 

and F11a of EAVS. 

10 C1a of EAVS. 

11 C1b of EAVS. 

12 C3a of EAVS. 

13 C4a of EAVS. 

14Q17 of Policy Survey. 

15 Q18 and Q18a of Policy 

Survey. 

16 Q19 of Policy Survey. 

Turnout 

66.6%

6
No. 11-10110.

#### Sanchez *v.*Pennsylvania.

Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.
#### Sandra AGRAZ, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOLDEN EMPIRE MORTGAGE, INC.; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-55037

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed December 21, 2017

Patricia Renee Rodriguez, Attorney, Rodriguez Law Group, Inc., Pasadena, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant

Madison Christian, Attorney, Golden Empire Mortgage, Inc., Westlake Village, CA, for Defendant-Appellee Golden Empire Mortgage, Inc.

Kasey Curtis, Reed Smith LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellee Wells Fargo Bank National Association

Abraham Joshua Colman, Esquire, Kasey Curtis, Reed Smith LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Sandra Agraz appeals from the district court’s order dismissing her federal claims alleging violations of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”) and the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal on the basis of the statute of limitations and under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). *Cholla Ready Mix, Inc. v. Civish,*382 F.3d 969, 973 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Agraz’s RESPA claim and TILA damages claim because these claims are barred by the applicable statutes of limitation and Agraz failed to allege facts demonstrating that equitable tolling should apply. *See*12 U.S.C. § 2614 (RESPA claims are subject to one- and three-year statutes of limitation); 15 U.S.C. § 1640(e) (TILA damages claims are subject to a one-year statute of limitations); *Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.,*656 F.3d 1034, 1045 (9th Cir. 2011) (federal standard for equitable tolling).

The district court properly dismissed Agraz’s TILA rescission claim because Agraz failed to allege facts sufficient to show that she exercised the right to rescind within three years of the consummation of her loan. *See*15 U.S.C. § 1635(f) (borrower’s right to rescind “shall 'expire three years after the date of consummation of the transaction or upon the earlier sale of the property”); *see also Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.,*— U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 790, 792, 190 L.Ed.2d 650 (2015) (“[Rescission is effected when the borrower notifies the creditor of his intention to rescind.”).

*917The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Agraz’s federal claims without leave to amend because amendment would be futile. *See Cervantes,*656 F.3d at 1041 (setting forth standard of review and explaining that a district court may dismiss without leave to amend where amendment would be futile).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Kyle M. Lampela, a member of the Senior Executive Service (SES), is the 

Director of the Operations and Integration Directorate (OI) for the Defense 

Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA). Mr. Lampela oversees all efforts of the 

directorate, which is responsible for applying advanced information 

technology, all-source intelligence and operational research analytics, 

operations and planning, interagency and partner coordination, and training 

support to enable the Department of Defense to counter weapons of mass 

destruction and emerging threats including their supporting facilitation 

networks.

Mr. Lampela became the OI Director after serving as the OI Deputy Director. 

Prior to joining OI, Mr. Lampela was the Chief of Staff for DTRA, where he 

served as the principal staff advisor to the Director. He was responsible for 

standardization and integration of all administrative and operational support 

activities. His office researched, evaluated and formulated plans, policies, programs, strategies, and 

courses of action for the Agency and also provided advice and counsel to DTRA senior leadership.

Mr. Lampela graduated from the United States Air Force Academy in 1984. During his service within the 

USAF, he accumulated more than 3,500 flight hours as a command pilot, flying a wide variety of aircraft 

including the U-2 Dragon Lady reconnaissance plane and the C-141 Starlifter and C-5 Galaxy military 

transport planes. He is a veteran of operations Desert Storm, Enduring Freedom, Iraqi Freedom, as well 

as combat activities in Somalia, Bosnia, and Kosovo. Mr. Lampela deployed as the Deputy Commander 

for Operations, 407th Expeditionary Group, Tallil Airbase, Iraq, in 2005-2006. His last military assignments 

were as the Chief of the Operations Division of the USSTRATCOM Center for Combating Weapons of 

Mass Destruction (SCC-WMD), and Deputy Director of the Combating WMD Enterprise. 

Following his retirement from active duty as a colonel in 2009, Mr. Lampela served nearly six years as the 

Chief of Staff for DTRA’s Research and Development Directorate. In 2015, he served as a Brookings 

Institute Legislative Fellow in the House of Representatives, where he worked as a Legislative Assistant 

to Congressman Mike Coffman of Colorado’s 6th District. In this role, he provided advice to the 

Congressman, drafted legislation and met with constituents on issues relating to Congress’ role in 

overseeing military, strategic forces, space, cyber and foreign relations issues. 

Mr. Lampela earned a Bachelor of Science in Management from the United States Air Force Academy in 

Colorado Springs, Colorado, a Master of Science in Systems Management from the University of 

Southern California - Los Angeles, and a Master of Science in Strategic Studies from Air War College, 

Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama. He was also a Senior Executive Fellow at the Kennedy School of 

Leadership, Harvard University, in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Kyle M. Lampela

Distribution Statement A - Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited