2009 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 4-28-2009 

# T am ar a K lopfe ns t ein v

. N atl S ales & S up P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 08-2950

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2009

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2009 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion " T am a r a K lopfe n s t ein v

. Natl S ale s & S up " (2009). 2009 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1466. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2009/1466T he H onor abl e R i char d G . St earns , D i s tr i ctJ udge fort he U ni t ed St at es D i s t r i ct * C our tforM as s achus et t s , s i t t i ng bydes i gnat i on. 1 NOT P RE CE DE NT I AL UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT N o. 08- 2950 T A M A R A K L O P F E N S T E IN , A ppel l ant

v. NA TI ON AL SA LES AND SUPP LY, LLC t/ d /b / a NA TI ON AL SA LES AND SUPP LY O n A p p ea l from the U n it ed S tat es D istri ct C o u rt fort he E as t ern D i s t r i ctof Penns y l vani a D i s t r i ctC our tN o. 2- 07- cv- 04004 D istri ct Ju d g e: T h e H o n o rab le B erle M . S ch il ler Subm i t t ed Pur s uantt o T hi r d C i r cui tL . A . R . 34. 1( a)

A pr i l 13, 2009 B e f o re : M c K E E , S M IT H , C i r cui tJudges , a n d S T E A R N S , D is t r i ct Judge * ( Fi l ed: A pr i l 28, 2009) OP I NI ON

S M IT H , C i r cui tJudge.T h e D istric t C o u rt h a d ju risd ictio n o v e r K lo p f e n ste in ’s f

e d e ra l cla im s p u rsu a n t to 1 28 U . S . C . § 1 33 1. W e hav e fi nal or der j uri sdi ct i on un der 28 U . S . C . § 1 29 1. W e exerci se p le n a ry re v ie w o v e r a g ra n t o f s u m m a ry ju d g m e n t. Far r el lv. P l ant ers Li f es aver s C o. , 2 0 6 F . 3 d 2 7 1 , 2 7 8 (3d C ir . 2 0 0 0 ). 2 T amar a K l opfens t ei n fi l ed a c om pl ai nti n Sept ember of 2007 aga i ns therfor m er e m p lo y e r, N a tio n a l S a les a n d S u p p ly , L L C ., a lleg in g c laim s u n d e r T itl e V II o f th e C iv il R i ght s A ctof 1964 forgenderdi s cr i m i nat i on, s exual har as s m ent , and r et al i at i on. A ft er di s coverycl os ed, K l opfens t ei n fi l ed a mot i on forpar t i al s um m aryj udgm enton her retali ati o n claim . N ati o n al S ales f il ed a m o ti o n fo r sum m aryjud g m en t as t o all o f h er empl oy m entdi s cr i m i nat i on cl ai m s . T he D i s t r i ctC our t , i n a w el l r eas oned opi ni on, concl uded thatK l opfens t ei n had fa i l ed t o es t abl i s h a pr i m a fa ci e ca s e foreac h of her cl ai m s . For t hatr eas on, t he D i s t r i ctC our tdeni ed K l opfens t ei n’ s m ot i on and gr ant ed s um m aryj udgm enton al l of hercl ai m s i n favorof N at i onal Sal es . T hi s t i m el yappea l fol l ow ed. 1 K l opfens t ei n ar gues t hatt he D i s t r i ctC our terr ed i n gr ant i ng s um m aryj udgm entas t o eac h of hercl ai m s . A ft erde novo r evi ew of t he r ecor d, w e ar e notper s uaded. For s ubs t ant i al l yt he r eas ons s etfor t h byt he D i s t r i ctC our t , w e w i l l aff i r m t he j udgm entof th e D istric t C o u rt.