alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>          5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE (IN THOUSANDS,  EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL
INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED  DECEMBER  31, 1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                   SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                        DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                                      515
<SECURITIES>                                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                             1,485
<ALLOWANCES>                                                               (177)
<INVENTORY>                                                               4,471
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                          6,515
<PP&E>                                                                    4,792
<DEPRECIATION>                                                           (1,785)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                           10,037
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                     3,006
<BONDS>                                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                                     55
<OTHER-SE>                                                                3,406
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                             10,037
<SALES>                                                                   2,503
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                          2,503
<CGS>                                                                     1,450
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                             1,450
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                          1,061
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                           90
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                             (98)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                         (98)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                                (98)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                             (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                              0.00
        

</TABLE>
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[R09-OAR-2010-0718; FRL- 

 

Determinations of Attainment by the Applicable Attainment 

Date for the Hayden, Nogales, Paul Spur/Douglas PM10

Nonattainment Areas, Arizona; Withdrawal of Direct Final 

Rule 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule. 

----------------------------------------------------------- 

SUMMARY: Due to the receipt of an adverse comment, EPA is 

withdrawing the November 2, 2010 (75 FR 67220), direct 

final rule determining that the Hayden, Nogales, and Paul 

Spur/Douglas areas in Arizona had attained the national 

ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) for particulate matter 

with an aerodynamic diameter of less than or equal to ten 

microns by the applicable attainment date. On the basis of 

this determination, EPA concluded that these three 

“moderate” nonattainment areas were not subject to 

reclassification. In the direct final rule, EPA stated that 

if adverse comments were submitted by December 2, 2010, the 

rule would be withdrawn and not take effect. On November 3, 

2010, EPA received a comment. EPA believes this comment is 

adverse and, therefore, EPA is withdrawing the direct final 

rule. EPA will address the comment in a subsequent final 

action based upon the proposed action also published on 
November 2, 2010 (75 FR 67303). EPA will not institute a 

second comment period on this action. 

DATES: The direct final rule published at 75 FR 67220 on 

November 2, 2010, is withdrawn as of [INSERT DATE OF 

PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wienke Tax, Air Planning 

Office, Air Division (AIR-2), Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 

94105, (415) 947-4192, tax.wienke@epa.gov. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, National 

Parks, Particulate matter, Wilderness Areas. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

November 19, 2010 _/s/ Keith Takata_____________ 

Dated Keith Takata, 

 Acting Regional Administrator, 

 Region IX.
<PAGE>   1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXCITE, INC.                                                       EXHIBIT 99.01
INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE 12 MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pursuant to Rule 158 of the Securities Act of 1933, set forth below is an
earnings statement covering the twelve month period ending June 30, 1997.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                12 MONTHS ENDED
                                                 JUNE 30, 1997
                                                   --------
<S>                                                <C>     
Revenues ...................................       $ 27,577
Cost of revenues:
  Cost of revenues excluding amortization ..          7,529
  Amortization of purchased technology .....          4,523
                                                   --------
        Total cost of revenues .............         12,052
                                                   --------
Gross profit ...............................         15,525
Operating expenses:
  Product development ......................         10,828
  Sales and marketing ......................         28,225
  Distribution license fees ................          1,913
  General and administrative ...............          6,100
  Charge for purchased in-process technology          3,500
  Merger and acquisition related costs,
     including amortization of goodwill and
     other purchased intangibles ...........          4,327
                                                   --------
        Total operating expenses ...........         54,893
                                                   --------
Operating loss .............................        (39,368)
                                                   --------
Interest income ............................          1,233
Interest and other expense .................           (604)
                                                   --------
Net loss ...................................       $(38,739)
                                                   ========
Net loss per share .........................       $  (3.18)
                                                   ========
Shares used in computing net loss per share          12,170
                                                   ========
</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. James Albert KNIGHTON, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40401 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed January 29, 2018

Jason B. Smith, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Shannon Charles Hooks, Austin, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before JONES, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James Albert Knighton challenges his bench-trial conviction of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2), asserting the court erred in denying his motion to suppress. He contends officers took his statements without proper *Miranda*warnings and “[t]he search of his home and vehicle was illegal”.

Pre-trial, Knighton stipulated the following facts, *inter alia:*federal agents saw him place several large plastic cases inside his vehicle; they searched his vehicle and found three rifles, one revolver, and one shotgun; and he possessed each firearm “in and affecting interstate commerce”. The district court had earlier denied his motions to suppress the firearms on the basis of the search-incident-to-arrest and automobile exceptions to the warrant requirement. At the bench trial, the district court, based on the stipulated facts, found Knighton guilty of being a felon in possession of a firearm.

Knighton’s contentions regarding *Miranda*and consent to search his home are irrelevant. His stipulation, which was the only evidence introduced at trial, listed only the five firearms found in his vehicle and, therefore, did not include any firearms found in his home. Accordingly, any contentions implicating the admissibility of firearms seized from his home are moot. *United States v. Lopez-Moreno,*420 F.3d 420, 435 (5th Cir. 2005) (defendant’s challenging introduction of documents not introduced at trial was moot).

Further, Knighton provides nothing in support of his conclusory assertion that “[t]he search of his ... vehicle was illegal”. His brief contains no reference to the search-incident-to-arrest or automobile exceptions to the warrant requirement. He has, therefore, abandoned any issue involving the admissibility of the firearms seized from the vehicle. Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(8); *Yohey v. Collins,*985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993); *Beasley v. McCotter,*798 F.2d 116, 118 (5th Cir. 1986).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAUL E

. LITONJUA, Jr.,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 16

- 73912

Agency No. A044

- 374

- 442

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 10 , 2018 **

Be fore: CANBY, W. FLETCHER, and CALLAHAN , Circuit Judges.

Raul E. Litonjua, Jr. , a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals ’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to

reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252

. We

review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen , Najmabadi v.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUL 13 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 73912

Holder , 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010) , and we deny the petition for review.

In denying Litonjua’s motion to reopen, the BIA limited its review to

Litonjua’s claim for deferral of removal under CAT because it found that

Litonjua’s motion did not address the underlying particularly serious crime

conviction which rendered him ineligi ble for asylum and withholding of removal.

In his opening brief, Litonjua does not challenge the BIA’s finding. See Corro

Barragan v. Holder , 718 F.3d 1174, 1177 n.5 (9th Cir. 2013) (failure to contest

issue in opening brief resulted in waiver). Thus, we deny the petition as to

Litonjua’s motion to reopen his asylum and withholding of removal claims

.

Further, t he BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Litonjua’s untimely

motion to reopen his claim for deferral of removal under CAT because L itonjua

failed to establish prima facie eligibility for CAT relief

. S ee 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2(c)(3)(ii) ; Cano

- Merida v. INS , 311 F.3d 960, 965

- 66 (9th Cir. 2002) (no

abuse of discretion in denying motion to reopen where petitioner did not establish

prima faci e eligibility for CAT relief)

.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
No. 11-10219.

#### Jimenez-Sanchez *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 Certification of
Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer
of VCA Antech, Inc.
   (i)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
  /s/ Robert L. AntinRobert L. AntinChief Executive Officer/s/ Tomas W. FullerTomas W. FullerChief Financial Officer 37
# Official Journal L 174/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 174 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6418 May 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 174

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6418 May 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/794 of 11 May 2021 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Nagykun rizs’ (PGI)) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/795 of 17 May 2021 withdrawing the approval of the active substance alpha-cypermethrin in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (
  1
  ) | 2 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/794 of 11 May 2021 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Nagykun rizs’ (PGI))

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/795 of 17 May 2021 withdrawing the approval of the active substance alpha-cypermethrin in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (
  1
  )

1

2

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Certifications

I, Richard Simpson, certify that:


1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC27 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);


2.	Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.	Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


4.	Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and


5.	All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas; CoreLogic Solutions, LLC; and Northmarq Capital, LLC.

Date:	March 31, 2023

/s/ Richard Simpson ___________________Richard SimpsonPresident, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)

CGCMT 2015-GC27 Certifications

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.6

                              Consent of Appraiser


     We hereby consent to the references made to us and/or our appraisal by
Hanover Equipment Trust 2001B, Hanover Compressor Company and Hanover
Compression Limited Partnership on the cover page of and under the headings
"Prospectus Summary--The Operating Lease Transaction," "Risk Factors," and "The
Equipment" in the Prospectus constituting a part of this Amendment No. 5 to
Registration Statement on Form S-4.


                                             AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC.

                                             By: /s/ Dale Egan
                                                --------------------------------
                                             Name:  Dale Egan
                                             Title: General Counsel

Milwaukee, Wisconsin
February 3, 2003
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.3

                CONSENT OF NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement of Harken Energy Corporation (the "Company") and to the references to
this firm for the Company's estimated domestic proved reserves contained in this
Registration Statement.

                                           NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.


                                           By: /s/ Danny D. Simmons
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                   Danny D. Simmons
                                                   Executive Vice President

Houston, Texas
December 19, 2002
DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY 

8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN ROAD, STOP 6201

FORT BELVOIR, VA 22060-6201

May 17, 2024 

MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRIBUTION C

SUBJECT: Policy Statement on Civilian Equal Employment Opportunity 

 The Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) supports and promotes the principals of 

equal employment opportunity (EEO) for its entire workforce and applicants for employment, 

regardless of their race, religion, color, sex (including pregnancy, gender identity and sexual 

orientation), national origin, age, genetic information, or disability. All civilian employees will 

have the freedom to compete on a fair and level playing field with equal opportunity for 

competition. EEO covers all civilian employees and employment programs, management 

practices, and decisions. This includes, but not limited to, recruitment, hiring, merit promotions, 

transfers, reassignments, training and career development, benefits, and separations. 

 We must prioritize and maintain an equitable, diverse, inclusive, and accessible 

workplace that is free of unlawful discrimination and other inappropriate conduct. Workplace 

harassment will not be tolerated, and the Agency will correct the harassing conduct before it

becomes severe or pervasive. Reprisals against civilian employees who engage in protected 

activities will not be tolerated, and the Agency supports all civilian employees’ ability to 

exercise their rights under civil rights statutes.

 I expect DTRA senior leaders, managers, and supervisors to take an active role in 

ensuring a workplace free of discrimination. Additionally, everyone has a role in creating a 

workplace free of discrimination by following the letter, intent, and spirit of EEO laws and 

policies. I expect leaders at all levels to take a swift and appropriate action against individuals 

who engage in inappropriate behavior or conduct. 

Civilian employees who believe they have been discriminated against have the right to 

file an EEO complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Office at DTRA Ft Belvoir Org

Mailbox DTRA EEO and Military Equal Opportunity Complaints (dtra.belvoir.org.mbx.dtraeeo-and-meo-complaints@mail.mil) without fear of harassment, reprisal, or retaliation based on 

participation in the EEO process. An attempt to restrain, interfere with, discourage, or coerce 

civilian employees or their representatives, witnesses, or Agency officials responsible for 

processing discrimination complaints is strictly prohibited and unlawful. 

 DTRA is a complex work environment where all people are valued and diversity of 

thought, perspective, background, and identity is among our Agency’s greatest strengths. 

Rebecca K.C. Hersman

Director
Exhibit 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, William W.
Burnham, Chairman of the Board and Acting Chief Financial Officer, of Trudy
Corporation do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:

     1)  The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
         September 30, 2005 being filed with the Securities and Exchange
         Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
         amended; and

     2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

This Certification accompanies this Form 10-QSB as an exhibit, but shall not be
deemed as having been filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or as a separate disclosure document of the Company or the
certifying officer.


                                       /s/ WILLIAM W. BURNHAM
                                       -----------------------------------------
Date: November 14, 2005                William W. Burnham
                                       Chairman of the Board,
                                       Acting Chief Financial Officer

                                       35