alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk November 20, 2012

t1113 

# Order

November 20, 2012

145587

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145587

COA: 310210

Mecosta CC: 09

- 006574

- FC

GERALD SIDNEY RACE, III, 09

- 006659

- FH

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 19, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for

consideration as on leave granted.
No. 11-9956.

#### Archuleta *v.*Galetka, Warden.

Sup. Ct. Utah. Certiorari denied.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6684** 

MAURICE WILCOX , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. WARDEN OF THE NOTTOWAY CORRECTIONAL CENTER , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Gerald Bruce Lee , District Judge. ( 1:13

- cv - 01589

- GBL

- IDD )

Submitted : September 29, 2015 Decided: December 16, 2015

Before DUNCAN and DIAZ , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Maurice Wilcox, Appellant Pro Se. Rosemary Virginia Bourne, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Maurice Wilcox seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate o f appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U. S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional ri ght. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wilcox has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 Certification of
Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer
of VCA Antech, Inc.
   (i)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
  /s/ Robert L. Antin
Robert L. AntinChief Executive Officer/s/ Tomas W. Fuller
Tomas W. FullerChief Financial Officer
 35
No. 11-10068.

#### Hollmon *v.*Woods, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>


                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K
                                 CURRENT REPORT

                       Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
                       the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

       DATE OF REPORT (DATE OF EARLIEST EVENT REPORTED): OCTOBER 23, 2002

                                   DYNEGY INC.
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

         Illinois                      1-15659                74-2928353
(State or other jurisdiction    (Commission File Number)     (IRS Employer
     of incorporation)                                     Identification No.)

                           1000 Louisiana, Suite 5800
                              Houston, Texas 77002
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

       Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (713) 507-6400

                                 Not Applicable
          (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)


<PAGE>



ITEM 5. OTHER EVENTS.

     On October 23, 2002, Dynegy Inc. ("Dynegy") issued a press release
announcing that Bruce A. Williamson, a former Duke Energy executive with more
than 20 years of experience in energy and finance, has been named Dynegy's
president and chief executive officer and elected to the board of directors.
Williamson's appointments, which were unanimously approved by Dynegy's board of
directors, are effective immediately. Dynegy also reported that Sheli Rosenberg,
vice chairman of Equity Group Investments, has resigned from Dynegy's board of
directors. A copy of Dynegy's October 23rd press release is attached hereto as
exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by this reference.

ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS

a) Financial Statements of Business Acquired - Not Applicable.

b) Pro Forma Financial Information - Not Applicable.

c) Exhibits:

     99.1 Press release of Dynegy Inc. dated October 23, 2002.



<PAGE>



                                    SIGNATURE

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                    DYNEGY INC.

                                    BY:   /s/ Keith R. Fullenweider
                                       -----------------------------------
                                       Keith R. Fullenweider
                                       Senior Vice President,
                                       Deputy General Counsel and Secretary

Dated:  October 23, 2002
J^rfflgCtonwAllWT* courtw?2?°'w

Ro.&*U2o* FEB 02

CftPXToL STOTibn)

ftUSTIUffl. 1*1)1 Abel Acosffa, a©*

Gear 0\sWl C\eLck;

Pleaae. loih 4* &rgltfflja, 2H mi PraPeMi uVtaW o4 W leWdo armed* Udube^CtWS^ciW 3Jl Cad remember Mai^r iv^rn^); u//// May Ptoe- §/Ve rru.

i^iWvYteVraJ t\ saoj teaeueb mi TwoCtf tausfioe&^io <hjaekn kjji% m^ fhofhj

TttuVfcwi 1 ^cJdreSSec) -Vo Mouf Wow) ofPtat CLivJer 4Vt (uarrui ai b/u/St PtfrtLScoJ ?

To tee 8(WfiJ -\o m^ ftrl iio.oofl C# Plee&tlru.0U>3 BSel-P &ddre&a) £faynP

l/»MaUl7Vne*

BcefijuW -fan a** 0a^

JSmoeu D/at Z(*V3M

mio Smbsc D/fte-

^fT.^,001

\
**
**Exhibit 34.4**

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

Managing Member 

Park Bridge Lender Services LLC 

New York, NY 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in theaccompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of 2018 Compliance by Park Bridge Lender Services LLC with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria (“Management’s Report”), that Park Bridge Lender Services LLC (the “Company”)complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB (item 1122(d)) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018, excluding those criteria determined by managementand noted as not applicable (N/A) within Exhibit B to Management’s Report. The transactions covered by this report are only those transactions processed by the Company in its capacity as trust advisor or operating advisor for the asset backedsecurities transactions (the “Platform”) identified in Management’s Report. Reference Exhibit A to Management’s Report for the transactions covered by this examination. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliancewith the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria based on our examination. 

We conducted our examination in accordance with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).Those standards require that we plan and perform theexamination to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Company complied with the applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d). Our examination included tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform,determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Ourprocedures were limited to the selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activities related to each asset backed transactionincluded in the Platform. Further an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the Company’s servicingactivities during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

In our opinion, management’sassertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria identified in Exhibit B to Management’s Report with respect to the transactions identified in Exhibit A to Management’s Report as of and for the yearended December 31, 2018, for the Platform, is fairly stated, in all material aspects. 

 

/s/ Katz, Sapper & Miller, LLP

New York, New York

February 20, 2019

 
1 

**
Total Polling Locations:

Election Day:7 264 

Early Voting:8 3 

Mail Ballots Transmitted10 Mail Ballots Returned11

187,360 163,234 (87.1% of 

transmitted) 

Mail Ballots Counted12 Mail Ballots Rejected13

161,135 (98.7% of 

returned)

2,099 (1.3% of 

returned) 

Mail Voting Policies 

No excuse is required for mail voting14

Does not conduct all-mail elections15

Some voters can register as permanent absentee16

EAVS Jurisdictions

3 

Total Registered Voters as of 

Nov. 3, 20201

739,672 

 

Registration Forms Received2*

707,749 

Total Confirmation Notices Sent3*

89,271 

2020 EAVS Data Brief: Delaware

 Voter Registration

0.3%

6.5%

21.4%

35.6%

36.1%

Other

In-Person

Online

Motor Vehicle Dept.

Mail, Email, Fax

Source of Registration Applications4

 Voter Turnout  Election Technology

In-Person 

Election 

Day Voters 

345,809

67.2%

Mail Voters 

161,135

31.3%

In-Person 

Early Voters 

5,236

1.0%

Other Mode 

2,476

0.5%

Voters Participating By Mode5

3 3 3 3

0 0

DRE with

VVPAT

Scanner Hand

Count

Electronic

Poll

Books

DRE w/o

VVPAT

Ballot

Marking

Device

Technology Used by Jurisdictions9

 Mail Balloting

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at www.eac.gov. 

The data shown are certified as final by state election authorities. 

Responses of “Does not apply,” “Data not available, ” and “Valid 

skip” are shown as zeroes or dashes. Percentages may not sum 

to 100% because of missing data or rounding. 

* Close of registration for 2018

general election to close of 

registration for 2020 general 

election. 

1 A1a of EAVS. 

2 A3a of EAVS. 

3 A8a of EAVS. 

4 Mail, Email, Fax is A4a. InPerson is A4b. Online is A4c. 

Motor Vehicle Dept. is A4d. 

Other is the sum of A4e–A4l. 

Denominator is A3a. 

5 In-Person Election Day Voters 

is F1b. Mail Voters is F1d+F1g. 

In-Person Early Voters is F1f. 

Other Mode is F1c+F1e+F1h. 

Denominator is sum of F1b–

F1h. 

6 F1a of EAVS. Denominator 

is citizen voting age 

population (CVAP). 

7 D3a of EAVS. 

8 D4a of EAVS. 

9 F3a–d, F5a, F6a, F7a, F8a, 

and F11a of EAVS. 

10 C1a of EAVS. 

11 C1b of EAVS. 

12 C3a of EAVS. 

13 C4a of EAVS. 

14 Q17 of Policy Survey. 

15 Q18 and Q18a of Policy 

Survey. 

16 Q19 of Policy Survey. 

Turnout

71.0%

6
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 828 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.828

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 25 Route 111 in Smithtown, New York, as the ``Congressman Bill Carney 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CONGRESSMAN BILL CARNEY POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 25 Route 111 in Smithtown, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Congressman Bill Carney Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Congressman Bill Carney Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### IN RE: Frederick H. BANKS, Petitioner

No. 17-3754

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. January 4, 2018

(Opinion filed: February 9, 2018)

Frederick H. Banks, Pro Se

Robert S. Cessar, Esq., Rebecca R. Haywood, Esq., Office of United States Attorney, Pittsburgh, PA, for Plaintiff-Respondent

Before: CHAGARES, GREENAWAY, JR. and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges

OPINION *

PER CURIAM

Frederick Banks has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus. For the reasons below, we will deny the petition.

In August 2015, Banks was charged in the District Court for the Western District *573of Pennsylvania with one count of interstate stalking. In January 2016, he was charged by a superseding indictment with aggravated identity theft, making false statements, and wire fraud. The criminal proceedings were delayed while Banks’s competency was evaluated. Banks filed a prior mandamus petition requesting, inter alia, that we order the District Court to “get the case moving.” On October 19, 2017, we denied the petition without prejudice to refiling if the District Court took no further action in the competency proceedings within sixty days. On December 12, 2017, the District Court determined that Banks is competent to stand trial. Finding that Banks was a clear and present danger to the community, the District Court denied his request for bond. In the instant mandamus petition, Banks requests that we order the District Court to decide the competency issue. He also requests that we order him released.

The writ of mandamus will issue only in extraordinary circumstances. See Sporck v. Peil, 759 F.2d 312, 314 (3d Cir. 1985). As a precondition to the issuance of the writ, Banks must establish that there is no alternative remedy or other adequate means to obtain the desired relief and must demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to the relief sought. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 403, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976). A writ is not a substitute for an appeal. See In Re Briscoe, 448 F.3d 201, 212 (3d Cir. 2006).

With respect to Banks’s request for release, there is the alternative remedy of appealing the denial of his request for bond. See 18 U.S.C. § 3145(c). Moreover, he has not shown a clear and indisputable right to such relief. His request that we order the District Court to determine the competency issue is moot, as the District Court recently made its determination on that issue. See In re Cantwell, 639 F.2d 1050, 1053 (3d Cir. 1981) (“[A]n appeal will be dismissed as moot when events occur during the pendency of the appeal which prevent the appellate court from granting any effective relief.”).

For the above reasons, we will deny the petition for mandamus.

*

 This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.
#### COM. v. TRUDEL, G.

3154 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/20/2017

CP-51-CR-0822991-1987 (Philadelphia)

Affirmed
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly report of The Jones Financial Companies,
L.L.L.P. on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 29, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
D. Weddle, Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, certify to the best of
my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Partnership.

                                       /s/  James D. Weddle
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P.
                                       August 8, 2007


                                      30
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Darren B. Miller, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Encompass Services Corporation, a Texas corporation (the "Company"), certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the
Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June
30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



                                        By: /s/ Darren B. Miller
                                            --------------------------------
                                        Name:   Darren B. Miller
                                        Title:  Senior Vice President and
                                                Chief Financial Officer

August 14, 2002
No. 11-1441.

#### Watson *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Prepared by R.R. Donnelley Financial -- EX-10.6




 Exhibit 10.6 
 SCYNEXIS, Inc. 
 Description of Non-Employee Directors Compensation
Program 
 Following the closing of this offering, we intend to compensate our non-employee directors with a combination of cash and equity.
Each non-employee director will receive an annual base cash retainer of $30,000 for such service, to be paid quarterly. In addition, the chairman of our board of directors will receive an additional annual base cash retainer of $15,000, to be paid
quarterly. 
 In addition, we intend to compensate the members of our board of directors for service on our committees as
follows: 
  

	 	Ÿ	 	 The chairperson of our audit committee will receive an annual cash retainer of $10,000 for this service, paid quarterly, and each of the other members
of the audit committee will receive an annual cash retainer of $6,500, paid quarterly. 


  

	 	Ÿ	 	 The chairperson of our compensation committee will receive an annual cash retainer of $7,500 for this service, paid quarterly, and each of the other
members of the compensation committee will receive an annual cash retainer of $5,000, paid quarterly. 


  

	 	Ÿ	 	 The chairperson of our nominating and corporate governance committee will receive an annual cash retainer of $4,500 for this service, paid quarterly,
and each of the other members of the nominating and corporate governance committee will receive an annual cash retainer of $3,000, paid quarterly. 


 Further, after the closing of this offering, each year on or promptly following the date of our annual meeting of stockholders, each non-employee director will be granted an option to purchase 7,500
shares of our common stock, and our chairman will be granted an additional option to purchase 3,750 shares of our common stock. If a new board member joins our board of directors after the closing of this offering, the director will be granted an
initial option to purchase 16,250 shares of our common stock, and if a new chairman joins our board of directors after the closing of this offering, the chairman will be granted an initial option to purchase 24,375 shares of our common stock. Annual
option grants and initial option grants to new board members will have an exercise price per share equal to the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date of grant and will vest in full on the earlier of our next annual meeting of
stockholders to occur in the year following the date of grant and the one year anniversary of the date of grant; provided, that the non-employee director is providing continuous services on the applicable vesting date.
<PAGE>
 
                             POSITRON CORPORATION
                  STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE LOSS
                     FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
                       (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.0



                                                       1996         1997
                                                    -----------  -----------
 
Net loss                                            $    (2,077)  $   (1,334)
                                                    ===========  ===========
 
Weighted average common shares used in computing
 net loss per share                                   3,637,320    4,473,566
                                                    ===========  ===========
 
Net loss per share                                       ($0.57)      ($0.30)
                                                    ===========  ===========