alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
CHDT Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Stewart Wallach, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
hereby certify that:





(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Stewart
Wallach


Stewart
Wallach


CEO,
Director


(Principal
Executive Officer)








May 14,
2008








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Total Polling Locations:

Election Day:7 21 

Early Voting:8 22 

Mail Ballots Transmitted10 Mail Ballots Returned11

704,040 599,505 (85.2% of 

transmitted) 

Mail Ballots Counted12 Mail Ballots Rejected13

597,912 (99.7% of 

returned)

1,593 (0.3% of 

returned) 

Mail Voting Policies 

No excuse is required for mail voting14

Conducts all-mail elections in some jurisdictions15

Any voter can register as permanent absentee16

EAVS Jurisdictions

56

Total Registered Voters as of 

Nov. 3, 20201

747,439 

Registration Forms Received2*

359,986 

Total Confirmation Notices Sent3*

107,111 

2020 EAVS Data Brief: Montana

 Voter Registration

0.0%

13.6%

23.9%

24.0%

38.5%

Online

Other

Motor Vehicle Dept.

In-Person

Mail, Email, Fax

Source of Registration Applications4

 Voter Turnout  Election Technology

In-Person 

Election 

Day Voters 

9,497

1.6%

Mail Voters 

597,912

97.7%

In-Person 

Early Voters

0

0.0%

Other Mode 

4,732

0.8%

Voters Participating By Mode5

56

46

10

0 0 0

Ballot

Marking

Device

Scanner Hand

Count

DRE w/o

VVPAT

DRE with

VVPAT

Electronic

Poll

Books

Technology Used by Jurisdictions9

 Mail Balloting

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at www.eac.gov. 

The data shown are certified as final by state election authorities. 

Responses of “Does not apply,” “Data not available, ” and “Valid 

skip” are shown as zeroes or dashes. Percentages may not sum 

to 100% because of missing data or rounding. 

* Close of registration for 2018 

general election to close of 

registration for 2020 general 

election. 

1 A1a of EAVS. 

2 A3a of EAVS. 

3 A8a of EAVS. 

4 Mail, Email, Fax is A4a. InPerson is A4b. Online is A4c. 

Motor Vehicle Dept. is A4d. 

Other is the sum of A4e–A4l. 

Denominator is A3a. 

5 In-Person Election Day Voters 

is F1b. Mail Voters is F1d+F1g. 

In-Person Early Voters is F1f. 

Other Mode is F1c+F1e+F1h. 

Denominator is sum of F1b–

F1h. 

6 F1a of EAVS. Denominator 

is citizen voting age 

population (CVAP). 

7 D3a of EAVS. 

8 D4a of EAVS. 

9 F3a–d, F5a, F6a, F7a, F8a, 

and F11a of EAVS. 

10 C1a of EAVS. 

11 C1b of EAVS. 

12 C3a of EAVS. 

13 C4a of EAVS. 

14Q17 of Policy Survey. 

15 Q18 and Q18a of Policy 

Survey. 

16 Q19 of Policy Survey. 

Turnout 

73.6%

6
Exhibit
10.4 


 


SHAREHOLDERS AGREEMENT


 


THIS AGREEMENT is made on the 26th day of July 2013


 


THE PARTIES TO THIS AGREEMENT ARE AS FOLLOWS:


 


EKATERINI LANARA, residing at 5 Impasse de la Fontaine, 98000
Monaco (“Shareholder A”);


 


DIMITRIOS SOURAVLAS, residing at 31 Avenue Princesse Grace,
98000 Monaco (“Shareholder B”);


 


Hereinafter called Shareholders of:


 


STALWART TANKERS INC., a company incorporated under the laws
of the Marshall Islands, whose registered address is at Trust Company Complex, Ajeltake Road, Ajeltake Island, Majuro, Marshall
Islands (“the Company”)


 


 


WHEREBY IT IS AGREED as follows:


 


 


Shareholder A and Shareholder B hereby agree to act together
concerning the operation and management of the Company.


 


 


IN WITNESS of which the parties have signed this Agreement the
day, month and year first above written.


 


 





	Signature:	/s/ Ekaterini Lanara	 
	 	 	 
	 	EKATERINI LANARA	 



 


	Signature:	/s/ Dimitrios Souravlas	 
	 	 	 
	 	DIMITRIOS SOURAVLAS
Exhibit 31.1

Certification Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Robert C. Skaggs, Jr., certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Columbia Pipeline Group Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015;
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |               |  |  |  |     |  |                          
|----- |  | ------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------
|Date: |  | April 7, 2016 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert C. Skaggs, Jr.
|      |  |               |  |  |  |     |  | Robert C. Skaggs, Jr.    
|      |  |               |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Doroteo RUBIO-DURAN, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40559 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 20, 2018

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Doroteo Rubio-Duran, Pro Se

Before REAVLEY, CLEMENT, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Doroteo Rubio-Duran has *298moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Rubio-Duran has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*6th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *298published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
IA

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 32

To consent to certain amendments enacted by the Legislature of the State

of Hawaii to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 21, 1997

Mr. ABERCROMBIE (for himself and Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA) introduced the

following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

JOINT RESOLUTION

To consent to certain amendments enacted by the Legislature

of the State of Hawaii to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, as required by section 4 of the Act entitled ‘‘An

4 Act to provide for the admission of the State of Hawaii

5 into the Union’’, approved March 18, 1959 (73 Stat. 4),

6 the United States consents to the following amendments

7 to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920, adopted

8 by the State of Hawaii in the manner required for State

9 legislation:
2

•HJ 32 IH

1 (1) Act 339 of the Session Laws of Hawaii,

2 1993.

3 (2) Act 37 of the Session Laws of Hawaii,

4 1994.

Æ
# C_2021088EN.01004101.xml

| 15.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 88/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/41

---

Action brought on 27 January 2021 — Cepewa v EUIPO — Out of the blue (LIEBLINGSMENSCH)

(Case T-47/21)

(2021/C 88/54)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Cepewa GmbH (Karben, Germany) (represented by: M. Gail, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Out of the blue KG (Lilienthal, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark LIEBLINGSMENSCH — EU trade mark No 16 566 531

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 November 2020 in Case R 918/2020-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) and (b) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b) and (d) of Regulation No (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) and (b) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b) and (d) of Regulation No (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of the first sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the first sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of the first sentence of Article 95 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the first sentence of Article 95 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
ACCEPTED 12-17-00268-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS 11/27/2017 8:17 AM

Pam Estes CLERK
) 

Regulatory Evaluation 

Fflfl ~ c2tJI5=-2Lf03 e,oi5-NM-OU-4j) Docket No. FAA.:2014-07~ Directorate Identifier: 2014 NM-136-AO 

lf)"oU make ch(mges to the volues in the tahle below, _vou rnusl ensure !hi! totals updati! according~v. ll 

tlwv do not. click (or Tab) into and then out oft he changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor + u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Pro!iJlcts 

Inspection 4.0 ....m"" 7~ ' 

'• 

' 

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $58,820 

Costs covered under wan·anty (if known) $ 

On-Condition Costs: 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

replacement) testing, and closeup) 

' 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This .field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 
Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? ~ 

YES* D NO [gl 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

I I AD s . "fi ? • t 1e s1gm I cant. , ____ _ 

YES* D NO [gl 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. ~ 

YES D NO [gl 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode oftransp011ation? · 

YES* D NO [gl 

*Explanation:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1993
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1993
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    00
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rathdaphone VONGDEUANE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-7421

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 30, 2018

Decided: February 2, 2018

Rathdaphone Vongdeuane, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jeanne Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rathdaphone Vongdeuane seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Vongdeuane has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
**Exhibit 99.3**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofALARIS Medical, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the Report), I, David L. Schlotterbeck, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adoptedpursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

/s/ DAVID L.SCHLOTTERBECK        David L. SchlotterbeckPresident and Chief Executive OfficerOctober 31, 2002

 

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 351 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con. Res.351
                                      Agreed to October 21, 1998        

                       One Hundred Fifth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  eight

                          Concurrent Resolution

 

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 3910) to authorize the 
Automobile National Heritage Area in the State of Michigan, and for 
other purposes, the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall strike 
section 406 and insert the following new section 406:

SEC. 406. TERMINATION OF CORRIDOR COMMISSION.

    Section 9(a) of such Act (102 Stat. 4556) is amended by striking 
``on the day occurring 5 years after the date of the enactment of this 
Act'' and inserting ``on November 18, 2003''.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 40 (Friday, February 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 9159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5195]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

DATE AND TIME: Friday, March 7, 1997, 8:00 a.m.

PLACE: Ramada Inn, 2700 U.S. 82 East, Greenville, Mississippi 38701.

STATUS:

Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Approval of Minutes of February 14, 1997 Meeting
III. Announcements
IV. Staff Report
V. State Advisory Committee Appointments for Alabama, Colorado, 
Connecticut, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Minnesota, and New 
Jersey.
VI. Future Agenda Items

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Barbara Brooks, Press and 
Communications (202) 376-8312.
Stephanie Y. Moore,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 97-5195 Filed 2-26-97; 2:35 p.m.]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-M
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8602 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1233 North Cedar Street in Owasso, Oklahoma, as the ‘‘Staff Sergeant 

Marshal Roberts Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 16, 2020 

Mr. KEVIN HERN of Oklahoma (for himself, Mr. MULLIN, Mr. COLE, Mr. 

LUCAS, and Ms. KENDRA S. HORN of Oklahoma) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1233 North Cedar Street in Owasso, Oklahoma, as the ‘‘Staff Sergeant Marshal Roberts Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STAFF SERGEANT MARSHAL ROBERTS POST 

4 OFFICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 1233 North Cedar Street in 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8602 IH

1 Owasso, Oklahoma, shall be known and designated as the 

2 ‘‘Staff Sergeant Marshal Roberts Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Staff Sergeant Mar7 shal Roberts Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.24

 

REVA MEDICAL, INC.

Independent Director Compensation Policy

 

Cash Compensation

 

Each independent director of REVA Medical, Inc. (the “Company”) will receive cash fees from the Company for their services as members of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) and any committee of the Board as follows:

 

·                    Each independent director will receive an annual fee of $35,000 payable for such director’s service for the upcoming year. 

 

·                    The Chair of the each Board committee will receive an additional annual fee of $5,000 for such Chair’s service for the upcoming year. 

 

Any independent directors serving a portion of the year shall be entitled to receive such fees on a pro rata basis based on their length of service during the year.

 

Equity Compensation

 

Each independent director may receive an annual option grant to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at the discretion of the Board, subject to obtaining approval from the Company’s stockholders in accordance with ASX Listing Rules. Any options granted pursuant to this policy shall vest in equal quarterly installments over a 12-month period beginning on the three month anniversary of the grant date.