alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R06-0AR-2006-0988; FRL
- -' Approval and Promulgation ofAir Quality Implementation Plans; Texas; Control ofAir Pollution from Motor Vehicles
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP) that amend Title 30 ofthe Texas Administrative Code (TAC), Chapter 114, Control of Air Pollution from Motor Vehicles. The State submitted these revisions on May 15,2006, October 10,2006, January 17,2008, and February 28,2008. These revisions establish the Rebate Grant Process and the Texas Clean School Bus Program under the Texas Emissions Reduction Plan (TERP), further amend the TERP, and amend the Locally Enforced Motor Vehicle Idling Limitations. The EPA is proposing to approve these SIP revisions because they allow for clarity and consistency ofthe SIP requirements. The EPA is proposing to approve these revisions pursuant to section 110 ofthe Federal Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before [Insert date 30 days from date of publication in the Federal Register).2 

### ADDRESSES: Comments may bemailedtoMr.GuyDonaldson.Chief. Air Planning Section (6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. Comments may also be submitted electronically or through hand delivery/courier by following the detailed instructionsin the Addresses section ofthe direct final rule located in the rules section ofthis 

### Federal Register.
FOR FURTHERINFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. DayanaMedina, Air Planning Section (6PD-L), MultimediaPlanning and Permitting Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, telephone (214) 665-7241; fax number 214-665-7263; e-mail address medina.dayana@epa.gov.


### SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rules section ofthis 

### Federal Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. Ifno relevant adverse comments are received in response to this action, no further activity is contemplated. IfEPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second commentperiod. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. Please note that ifEPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section ofthis rule and ifthat provision may be severed from the remainder ofthe rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions ofthe rule that are not the subject ofan adverse comment.3

For additional information, see the direct final rule, which is located in the rules section 

# f 9:-. <s OWye)'\c.q 

## E..**~i:Q** 

## fleld j Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6 Dated: ofthis 

### Federal Register.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of China  Direct  Trading
Corporation  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Howard Ullman,  Chief  Executive/Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/    Howard Ullman
Howard Ullman
CEO, President and Chairman
(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)


November 11, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|   | 1)     | The      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31,      2009, being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the      “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|   | 2)     | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company.                                                                                                                                                     |

| Date:      March 5, 2010 | By:                                | /s/      Fell C. Herdeg |
|--------------------------|------------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                     |  Fell      C. Herdeg,         |
|                     |  Chief      Financial Officer |

----
[4910-I3-P]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NClJllJtENfES

lrrll<GSn"lJOc

Federal Aviation Administration

NITlAI.S'lG

14 CFR Part 39

~D\D- e> Ia..q

{Docket No. :FA..i\..-~-*****; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-245-AD)

RIN 2120-AA64

ROlITINGSY"FlOL

ISiC

N1TlALSIS1(;

, ,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

The loss of multiple display units, if not corrected expediently during a

high workJoad period, potentially affects the capability of the flight crew

and could contribute to a loss of situational awareness and consequent

control of the aeroplane, which would constitute an unsate condition.

,

Several occurrences ofloss oftbe AC (alternating current) BUS 1 have

been reported which led in some instances to the loss of the AC ESS

(essential) BUS and DC (direct current) ESS BUS and cOlmected systems.

The affected systems include multiple flight deck Display Units (Primary

Flight Display, Navigation Display and Upper Electronic Centraliscd

Aircraft Monitoring display).

condition as:

listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness ' ~M__

I. LTJAL\'5 G

information (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify C. ~

and COlTeet an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe A~/(J ~II 0

"OUHN<'; SYMf>:)L

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the product

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulernaking (NPRM).

Antwortbiness Directives; Airbus A318, A319, A320, A321 Series Airplanes

INITIAlSIS1G

[lAT~
<PAGE>
 
[DESTEC LOGO APPEARS HERE]                                      NEWS RELEASE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                         INVESTOR CONTACT: Richard H. Woodfin
                                                           713/735-4022
                                         MEDIA CONTACT:    Marvin L. Brown, Jr. 
                                                           713/735-4215

                                                           October 1, 1996




                      DESTEC RETAINS MORGAN STANLEY & CO.


        Destec Energy, Inc. (NYSE: ENG), a leading independent power producer 
based in Houston, Texas, announced today that its Board of Directors has 
unanimously determined to retain the investment banking firm of Morgan Stanley &
Co. Incorporated to assist Destec in exploring strategic alternatives to 
maximize shareholder value, including a possible sale of the Company.  However, 
no decision has been made at this time to pursue any particular transaction.
        Destec is a major independent power company that owns power generation
and gasification facilities which produce, sell and market electricity, steam
and synthetic fuel gas. Destec has interests in 22 operating projects with a
total rated equivalent capacity of approximately 4,886 megawatts of electricity-
1,836 of that total outside the U.S. - and over three million pounds per hour of
steam. Destec currently has four international projects, representing
approximately 1,100 megawatts of capacity, in construction or advanced
development.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of CBQ,  Inc., on Form 10-QSB
for the  period  ending  September  30,  2003 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the  undersigned,  Paul
Richter,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Principal  Accounting  Officer  of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: November 14, 2003

/s/ Paul Richter
Paul Richter
Vice-President
(Principal executive and financial officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
OncoLogic Justification Report 

CH--~~~~: C - C - Z 

II 

0 

SUMMARY 

CODE NUMBER FRET090536 

SUBSTANCE ID Primary component of 09-0536 

The final level of carcinogenicity concern for this aldehyde when the 

anticipated route of exposure is dermal is LOW-MODERATE. 

JUSTIFICATION: 

Aldehydes are reactive electrophilic chemicals which may react with 

macromolecules or cause crosslinking to initiate carcinogenesis. 

However, being soft electrophiles, aldehydes tend to react 

preferentially with cellular nucleophiles such as glutathione before 

attacking macromolecules. Furthermore, aldehydes can be readily 

oxidized to acids which are not electrophilic and can be readily 

excreted. Therefore, the carcinogenic action of aldehydes tends to 

require relatively high doses and to confine close to the site of 

administration.In general, the carcinogenic activity of aldehydes 

decreases with increase in molecular size. Introduction of 

hydrophilic group(s) is also inhibitory. alpha,beta-Unsaturation 

generally increases the carcinogenic potential provided that the 

beta-position is not sterically hindered. Halogenation of the 

alpha-carbon also increases the carcinogenic potential. 

An aldehyde has a baseline level of concern of LOW-MODERATE. 

The group to which the aldehyde is attached (Rl), which is an alkyl 

group containing three carbons, is not expected to significantly 

affect the level of concern. 

Therefore, the level of concern remains LOW-MODERATE. 

It is uncertain whether the substituent(s) on Rl denoted as 'Z' have 

any significant effect on the level of concern. 

Exposure by the dermal route is not expected to significantly affect 

the level of concern, therefore the level of concern remains 

LOW-MODERATE. 

The final level of concern when the anticipated route of exposure is 

dermal is LOW-MODERATE. 

1
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Golden River Resources
Corporation (the "Company") for the three months ended March 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"),
the undersigned, Peter Lee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1)  The report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date:     May 10, 2006

                                            /s/Peter Lee
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Peter Lee
                                            Director, Secretary and
                                            Chief Financial Officer


                                                                              22
#### NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Elois C. BAXTER, Defendant-Appellant, and The Summit Community Association, Inc.; The United States of America, Acting by and through its agency, The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Defendants.

No. 17-2028

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 19, 2017

Decided: December 21, 2017

Elois C. Baxter, Appellant Pro Se. Travis Emil Menk, BROCK *&*SCOTT, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Elois C. Baxter seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and remanding this removed action to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. “[A] district court may remand a case ... for lack of subject matter jurisdiction at any time, and such an order is not reviewable.” *Doe v. Blair,*819 F.3d 64, 66-67 (4th Cir. 2016) (citations omitted); *see also*28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), (d) (2012). Because we lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s order, we dismiss this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the máterials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process,

*DISMISSED*
#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. George Verle CONARD, Petitioner

No. 489 MAL 2017

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

January 4, 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
No. 11-9806.

#### Roberts *v.*Florida et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Dominic A. TURNER Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-2581

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: February 2, 2018

Filed: February 12, 2018

Jeffrey Q. McCarther, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Kansas City, MO, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Anita L. Burns, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Kansas City, MO, for Defendant-Appellant

Dominic A. Turner, Pro Se

Before BENTON, MURPHY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Dominic A. Turner directly appeals the within-Guidelines-range sentence the district court1 imposed after he pled guilty to *364being a felon in possession of a firearm. His- counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that the sentence is substantively unreasonable. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

Upon careful review, this court concludes that the district court did not impose a substantively unreasonable sentence. *See United States v. Feemster,*572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (discussing appellate review of sentencing decisions); *United States v. Callaway,*762 F.3d 754, 760 (8th Cir. 2014) (on appeal, within-Guidelines-range sentence may be presumed reasonable). In addition, we have independently reviewed the record under *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and have found no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.

The judgment is affirmed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

1

. The Honorable Roseann A. Ketchmark, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
CERTIFICATION                                                       Exhibit 31.1
Chief Executive Officer

I, Robert Moore, President and Chief Executive Officer certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Chadmoore  Wireless
     Group, Inc;

2.   Based on my knowledge,  the report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material  fact or omit to state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the report;

3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
     information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects
     the financial  conditions,  the results of its operations and cash flows of
     the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in the report;

4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible
     for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as
     defined in Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14 and 15d-14) for the  registrant  and
     have:

     a.   Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
          consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to them by  others  within
          those entities,  particularly  during the period in which the periodic
          reports are being prepared;

     b.   Evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          the report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c.   Presented in the report their  conclusions  about the effectiveness of
          the disclosure controls and procedures based on their evaluation as of
          the Evaluation Date;

5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
     based  on our  most  recent  evaluation,  to the  small  business  issuer's
     auditors  and the audit  committee  of the board of  directors  (or persons
     fulfilling the equivalent function):

     a.   All significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation  of internal  controls or  financial  reporting  which could
          adversely  affect the issuer's ability to record,  process,  summarize
          and report financial data; and

     b.   Any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant  role in the small business  issuer's
          internal controls over financial reporting.


August 15, 2005

/s/ ROBERT W. MOORE
------------------------
Robert W. Moore
Chief Executive Officer
#### MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant-Appellee

2017-1254

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

January 11, 2018

*685Donald Puckett, Nelson Bumgardner PC, Fort Worth, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant, Also represented by John Matthew Murrell, Daniel Robinson Scardino, Reed & Scardino LLP, Austin, TX.

Siraj M. Abhyankar, Alston *&*Bird LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by Robert L. Lee, Patrick Flinn.

(Reyna, Taranto, and Chen, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Broadcaster, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Blair Mills, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





| |                                                                        
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                        
| | /s/ BLAIRMILLS                                                         
| | Blair Mills, III,
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)



Date:  February 19, 2008





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.