alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.4

SERVICER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB UNDER THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

|   | Re: | HSBC Home Equity Loan Trust 2006-4 |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------|

I, Richard Farrand, Chief Operating Officer of HSBC Electronic Data Processing (India) Private Limited, (the “Company”), pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB under the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 3.10(a) of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of December 14, 2006 (the “Agreement”), among HSBC Home Equity Loan Corporation I, as Depositor, HSBC Finance Corporation, as Servicer, HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as Administrator, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, hereby certify that:

 

|   | 1. | A review of the activities of the Company from December 14, 2006 through December 31, 2006 and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period referred to above except as set forth below: |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | NONE |
|--------|------|

 

|   | IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate this 5th day of March 2007. |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

HSBC Electronic Data Processing (India) Private

  Limited

 

|   | By: | /s/ Richard Farrand |
|--------|-----|---------------------|

|   | Name: | Richard Farrand |
|--------|-------|-----------------|

|   | Title: | Chief Operating Officer |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM (A)
FORM 10-QSB for the quarter eneded September 30,1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B)Form 10-QSB
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000814920                        
<NAME>                        Millennia, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         83697
<SECURITIES>                                   18750
<RECEIVABLES>                                  83876
<ALLOWANCES>                                   25000
<INVENTORY>                                    113631
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               342610
<PP&E>                                         1910000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 187897
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2771632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          795697
<BONDS>                                        0         
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       455
<OTHER-SE>                                     381172
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2771632
<SALES>                                        303859
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               303859
<CGS>                                          297150
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  182982
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               102794
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             48447
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (237514)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (237514)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (237514)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.14)
        




</TABLE>
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014, byand among RBS COMMERCIAL FUNDING INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, asGeneral Special Servicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Master Servicer, NCB, FSB, as Co-opSpecial Servicer, TRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, INC, as Trust Advisor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as TaxAdministrator and as Custodian, and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asTrustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2014-C23 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the General Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 throughDecember 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performanceper the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicer has fulfilled allof its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

  

/s/Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. JOSUE COUTO-AGUIRRE, Defendant - Appellant. No. 13-50590 D.C. No. 3:13-cr-02462-LAB-2
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 8, 2015 Pasadena, California UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. SAUL GARCIA-CABELLO, Defendant - Appellant. No. 13-50594 D.C. No. 3:13-cr-02462-LAB-1 

# FILED
MAR 04 2015 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding Submitted January 8, 2015 ** Pasadena, California Before: KOZINSKI, WARDLAW, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. Josue Couto-Aguirre (Couto) and Saul Garcia-Cabello (Garcia) appeal the district court’s rejection of a two-level decrease in their offense level calculations based on their minor roles in the offense of conviction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand for resentencing. The district court clearly erred in denying a minor role adjustment because there was no evidence in the record to support its finding that Couto and Garcia knew that there were drugs in the tir es of the truck on the first trip. United States v. Rodriguez-Castro , 641 F.3d 1189, 1192 (9th Cir. 2011); United States v. Fitch , 659 F.3d 788, 797 (9th Cir. 2011). The district judge erroneously relied on speculation as to what Couto and Garcia must have “f elt” when driving or riding in the truck. The district court itself noted that in prior, similar cases, expert testimony on the effect of drug-laden tires had been intr oduced to address the issue of knowledge. Moreover, here Couto and Garcia crossed the border without incident, further

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2undermining the court’s views as to th e obviousness that substantial quantities of drugs were in the truck’s tires. The distri ct judge therefore based his denial of the minor role adjustment on unsupported, an ecdotal experience, which constitutes clear error. Rodriguez-Castro , 641 F.3d at 1192. As the government recognized when it recommended a minor role adjustment for both Couto and Garcia, th ey each may very well be entitled to such an adjustment. We ther efore vacate the sentences imposed and remand for resentencing. VACATED and REMANDED.

3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            55564
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           830
<OTHER-SE>                                     (56394)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1143
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1143)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1143)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1143)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        


</TABLE>
No. 11-10154.

#### Reaid *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 99.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of CBQ,  Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the
period  ending  September 30, 2002,  as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission  on the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Richard  Gregory,  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/S/ Richard Gregory
Chief Financial Officer
November 11, 2002
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                       Consent of Independent Accountants

     We hereby consent to the use in this Amendment No. 4 to Registration
Statement on Form S-4 of our report dated November 20, 2002 relating to the
financial statements of Hanover Equipment Trust 2001A, which appears in such
Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading
"Experts" in such Registration Statement.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Houston, Texas
January 10, 2003
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8322 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to provide the Secretary of 

Health and Human Services with the authority to temporarily modify 

certain Medicare requirements for hospice care during the COVID public 

health emergency. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2020 

Mr. BALDERSON (for himself and Ms. SHALALA) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of 

such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to provide 

the Secretary of Health and Human Services with the 

authority to temporarily modify certain Medicare requirements for hospice care during the COVID public health 

emergency. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘COVID-19 Hospice 

5 Respite Care Relief Act of 2020’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8322 IH

1 SEC. 2. SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY TO TEMPORARILY MOD2 IFY CERTAIN MEDICARE REQUIREMENTS 

3 FOR HOSPICE CARE DURING THE COVID PUB4 LIC HEALTH EMERGENCY. 

5 (a) AUTHORITY.—The first sentence of section 

6 1135(b) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b– 

7 5(b)) is amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (7), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

9 end; 

10 (2) in paragraph (8), by striking the period at 

11 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

12 (3) by inserting after paragraph (8) the fol13 lowing new paragraph: 

14 ‘‘(9) the limitations under section 

15 1861(dd)(1)(G) that respite care— 

16 ‘‘(A) may only be provided in an inpatient 

17 setting; and 

18 ‘‘(B) may not be provided consecutively for 

19 more than five days (except that the Secretary 

20 may not increase the number of consecutive 

21 days to more than 15 days).’’. 

22 (b) EMERGENCY PERIOD.—Section 1135(g)(1)(B) of 

23 the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b–5(g)(1)(B)) is 

24 amended, in the matter preceding clause (i), by striking 

25 ‘‘subsection (b)(8)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraphs (8) and (9) 

26 of subsection (b)’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8322 IH

1 (c) IMPLEMENTATION.—Notwithstanding any other 

2 provision of law, the Secretary of Health and Human 

3 Services may implement the amendments made by this 

4 section by interim final rule, program instruction, or oth5 erwise. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.33  - AMENDMENT TO JAM EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT






Exhibit 10.33


AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, dated November 11, 2013 (the “Amendment”) by and between ACORN ENERGY, INC., a Delaware corporation (with its successors and assigns, referred to as the “Corporation”) and JOHN A. MOORE hereinafter referred to as “Moore.”


Preliminary Statement


The Corporation and Moore previously entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of December 13, 2012 (the “Agreement”), and the Corporation and Moore hereby desire to amend the Agreement as set forth herein.


Agreement


Moore and the Corporation therefore agree as follows:


		
	1.
	Reduction of Base Salary.  The first sentence of Section 3(a) of the Agreement, Compensation-Base Salary, is hereby deleted and the following substituted in its place:




Effective as of the payroll period commencing October 16, 2013, the Corporation shall pay MOORE a base salary of $318,750 per annum through the end of the Term.
    
		
	2.
	Base Salary Applicable to Certain Termination Events.  As used in clauses (d) and (e) of Section 6 of the Agreement, the term “then-current base salary” shall mean $425,000 (regardless of the amount specified in Section 3(a) of the Agreement as “base salary”. 




		
	3.
	Payment Terms.  The first sentence of Section 8 of the Agreement is hereby deleted and the following substituted in its place:




Payment of any amounts to which MOORE shall be entitled pursuant to the provisions of Section 6 shall be made in 12 equal monthly installments commencing on or after the six (6) month anniversary of the date of termination of employment, but in no event later than thirty (30) days following such six (6) month anniversary. 
 
		
	4.
	Ratification.  Moore and the Corporation hereby ratify and confirm the terms of the Agreement as amended hereinabove.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.


/s/JOHN A. MOORE
ACORN ENERGY, INC.


By:  
/s/Heather K. Mallard
Title: Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary


By:              
/s/Christopher E. Clouser
Title: Chairman of the Board, Chairman of the
Compensation Committee
#### S.A.R. v. D.C.R.

415 MDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/15/2017

2011-2240 (Franklin)

Affirmed
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Paul C. Honda, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Honda Auto Receivables 2014-4 Owner Trust
(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken
as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act
periodic reports;



4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required
in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and



5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably
relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Citibank, N.A.



Date: June 15, 2017



|/s/ Paul C. Honda                                    | 
|---------------------------------------------------- | 
|Paul C. Honda                                        | 
|Vice President and Assistant Secretary               | 
|American Honda Finance Corporation                   | 
|(senior officer in charge of the servicing function) |
[Cite as State v. Greer , 2018-Ohio-3008.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

BUTLER COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2017-12-166

: D E C I S I O N - vs - 7/30/2018 : DONALD L. GREER, : Defendant-Appellant. :

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. CR2016-12-1817

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, John C. Heinkel, Government Services Center, 315 High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for plaintiff-appellee Charles M. Conliff, P.O. Box 18424, Fairfield, Ohio 45018-0424, for defendant-appellant

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon a brief filed by appellant's counsel. {¶ 2} Counsel for appellant, Donald L. Greer, has filed a br ief with this court pursuant

to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial courtButler CA2017-12-166

- 2 - prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists five potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. {¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the tr ial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to wit hdraw as counsel is grant ed, and this a ppeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

HENDRICKSON, P.J., RINGLAND and PIPER, JJ., concur.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Threat Reduction Agency 

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  DTRA Leadership             
  -  DTRA History             
  -  Mission             
  -  Strategic Initiatives             
  -  Foreign Malign Influence             
  -  Agency Overview Brief (pdf)             
  -  Agency Financial Report 
-  Careers & Opportunities    -  Your Civilian Career             
  -  Your Military Career             
  -  Welcome Aboard 
-  Business    -  DTRA Contract Award Data             
  -  Office of Small Business             
  -  Mentor Protege Program 
-  News & Media    -  Press Center 
-  Contact Us		 
-  Joint Operations Center		 

# DTRA FOIA Reading Room Archive

# FOIA Request 20-063 First Interim 

##                 COVID Information            

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

## Related Links

20-063 First Interim PDF

COVID
No. 11-1529.

#### Brown *v.*Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Assn.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.