alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: 2014-NM-230-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspections 1.0 $ 85.00 $0 $ 85.00 80 $6,800.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance: 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $6,800

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $0

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

Replacement 3.0 $ 255.00 $0 $ 255.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 330 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 330

    Expressing the sense of the Congress that official mail sent by 
 Government agencies at taxpayer expense should be subject to certain 
                           uniform standards.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 25, 1998

Mr. Frelinghuysen submitted the following concurrent resolution; which 
    was referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
    Expressing the sense of the Congress that official mail sent by 
 Government agencies at taxpayer expense should be subject to certain 
                           uniform standards.

Whereas franked mail sent from within the legislative branch of the Government 
        is subject to strict regulations relating to their content as well as 
        the tracking of expenses associated therewith; and
Whereas the executive branch of the Government, by contrast, is not similarly 
        subject to uniform regulations on the content of taxpayer-financed 
        penalty mail: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that agencies within the executive 
branch of the Government should be required annually to purge their 
mailing lists to ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently, and 
to report on the accuracy of such lists.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 62 (Thursday, March 31, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 18851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06787]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #17352 and #17353; Kansas Disaster Number KS-
00149]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Kansas

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Kansas 
(FEMA-4640-DR), dated 02/17/2022.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Straight-line Winds.
    Incident Period: 12/15/2021.

DATES: Issued on 03/22/2022.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 04/18/2022.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/17/2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of 
Kansas, dated 02/17/2022, is hereby amended to include the following 
areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Norton, Phillips.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Francisco S[aacute]nchez,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2022-06787 Filed 3-30-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 64 (Monday, April 4, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19474-19475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07005]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[S-42-2022]

Foreign-Trade Zone 24--Pittston, Pennsylvania Application for 
Subzone Sandvik Mining and Construction Logistics Limited, Clarks 
Summit, Pennsylvania

    An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) 
Board by the Eastern Distribution Center, Inc., grantee of FTZ 24, 
requesting subzone status for the facility of Sandvik Mining and 
Construction Logistics Limited, located in Clarks Summit, Pennsylvania. 
The application was submitted pursuant to the provisions of the 
Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the 
regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400). It was formally 
docketed on March 28, 2022.
    The proposed subzone (4.5 acres) is located at 1200 Griffin Pond 
Road, Clarks Summit. No authorization for production activity has been 
requested at this time. The proposed subzone would be subject to the 
existing activation limit of FTZ 24.
    In accordance with the FTZ Board's regulations, Elizabeth Whiteman 
of the FTZ Staff is designated examiner to review the application and 
make recommendations to the Executive Secretary.
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions 
shall be addressed to the FTZ Board's Executive

[[Page 19475]]

Secretary and sent to: [email protected]. The closing period for their 
receipt is May 16, 2022. Rebuttal comments in response to material 
submitted during the foregoing period may be submitted during the 
subsequent 15-day period to May 31, 2022.
    A copy of the application will be available for public inspection 
in the ``Online FTZ Information Section'' section of the FTZ Board's 
website, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz.
    For further information, contact Elizabeth Whiteman at 
[email protected].

    Dated: March 29, 2022.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-07005 Filed 4-1-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```
No. 11-1267.

#### Lahrichi *v.*Lumera Corp. et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-1499.

#### Lamons *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-1299.

#### Calabrese *v.*Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services Calabrese *v.*Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services Calabrese *v.*Department of Health and Human Services et al. Calabrese *v.*Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services Calabrese *v.*Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services and Calabrese *v.*Department of Health and Human Services

(Reported below: 446 Fed. Appx. 38);

(446 Fed. Appx. 1);

(446 Fed. Appx. 50);

(446 Fed. Appx. 33);

(446 Fed. Appx. 34);

(446 Fed. Appx. 47). C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
                   
           
           
       
<S>                        <C>    
        
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-Mos
<PERIOD-END>                    Jun-30-1997
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1997
             

<CASH>                          5,573
<SECURITIES>                      167
<RECEIVABLES>                     138
<ALLOWANCES>                        0
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    0
<PP&E>                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 21,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               0
<BONDS>                           801
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<COMMON>                          370 
<OTHER-SE>                     17,932
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   21,200
<SALES>                         1,870
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                2,935 
<CGS>                             452 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     452
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  894  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 28 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 1,561    
<INCOME-TAX>                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             1,561
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                    1,561
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                     .38
        

</TABLE>
[4916-13-1'1 ro~

~~

ANEISOENI

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Adminismtlolll

14eFR Part 39 ~~

ANEI50MG

[Do<ket No. FAA-2007-27346; Direeto •.••te Identifier 200S-NM-20S-AD;

Ic?l'JiP !G 20IC-C: -0""

Amendment 39-- •.•. tt*"'; AD 2609-tll2'_"'*]

RIN 2128-AA64

Airworthiness DJrectivei; Sicma Aero Seat 90XX and 92XX Series Passenger Seats.

-G.-h" !:,- -.. ,1<,: ~r'-,,-.. -or' 1'...;'-,' ,,' "

Installed on, but not Limiled to ATR' Model ATR42 Airpl~es and Model ATRn

c . L:t~

ACTION: Final rule.

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransportation

Airplanes

-iJ7 ;,,~

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed j~C-l,

~~

above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl)

(DOT).

-/ originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe ./

condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as:

Cracks have been found in central spreaders PIN [part number]

92·000100-20(}'] or PIN 92-000101·200-1. This may beavily affect the

structural integrity of the seat.

Failure of the central spreaders could result in injury to an occupant during emergency

conditions. We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe condition on

these products.

DATES: This AD becomes effective [insert date 35 days after date of publication in the

FEDERAL REGISTER].
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 828 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 1, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 25 Route 111 in Smithtown, New York, as 

the ‘‘Congressman Bill Carney Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 828 RFS

1 SECTION 1. CONGRESSMAN BILL CARNEY POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 25 Route 111 in Smithtown, New 

4 York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Congressman 

5 Bill Carney Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Congressman Bill Car10 ney Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 30, 2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-15-0000568 17-DEC-2015 08:14 AM
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed July 

11, 2019.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-19-00510-CV

IN RE PHYLLIS MORGAN, Relator 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING 

WRIT OF MANDAMUS 

 239th District Court 

Brazoria County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 95704-CV

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

On June 27, 2019, relator Phyllis Morgan filed a petition for writ of mandamus 

in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (Supp.); see also Tex. R. App. P. 

52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Patrick Sebesta, 

presiding judge of the 239th District Court of Brazoria County, to vacate his June 
2 

21, 2019 order for relator to produce her homeowner’s insurance policy within thirty 

days of the order.

Relator also has filed a motion for temporary relief, asking this court to stay 

this order pending a decision on his petition. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10.

To obtain mandamus relief, a relator must show that the trial court clearly 

abused its discretion. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) 

(orig. proceeding); In re Garza, 544 S.W.3d 836, 840 (Tex. 2018) (orig. proceeding) 

(per curiam). Relator has not shown that the trial court clearly abused its discretion.

We therefore deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for stay.

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Hassan.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

   We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form S-4 of
NextMedia Operating, Inc., of our reports dated as of December 31, 1999 and
1998 and for the two years then ended, and for the period from January 1, 2000
to March 6, 2000 relating to the financial statements and financial statement
schedules of Wilmington WJBR-FM, LLC which appears in such Registration
Statement. We also consent to the references to us under the headings "Experts"
and "Selected Financial Data" in such Registration Statement.

Weeks Holderbaum Huber & DeGraw, LLP

Bridgewater, New Jersey
March 11, 2002
NO. 07-04-0569-CR IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL D MAY 25, 2005

______________________________ ANDY DEWAYNE POSEY , Appellant

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

_________________________________ FROM THE 181 ST DISTRIC T COURT O F RANDALL COUNTY; NO. 15,058-B; HON. JOHN B. BOARD, PRESIDING

_______________________________ Memorandum Opinion

_______________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS an d CAMPBELL, JJ. An dy DeW ayne Pose y (appella nt) app ealed f rom his co nviction f or posse ssing a controlled substance. Vi a a single issue, he conten ded that the tri al court erre d in denying his motion to suppress physical evidence . T he State filed an appel lee’s brief and conceded that the po lice officers “did not have reasonable sus picion to stopthe vehicle” and that this cour

t “should . . . rever

se the judgment and remand the case back to the trial co urt f or further proceedings.” We reviewed the brie fs and record and found g rounds2

supporting the State’s co ncession. According ly, the judgment of the trial court i s revers ed and the cause isremanded to the tr ial court for further proceedi ngs. Per Curiam Do not publish .
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 134 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                             H. J. RES. 134

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1999, and 
                          for other purposes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 134

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1999, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That section 106(c) of Public 
Law 105-240 is further amended by striking ``October 12, 1998'' and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``October 14, 1998''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 12, 1998.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 99.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of CBQ,  Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the
period  ending  September 30, 2002,  as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission  on the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Richard  Gregory,  Chief
Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



  /s/ Richard Gregory
Richard Gregory
Chief Executive Officer
November 11, 2002
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

**Section 906 Certificate**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Adrian Rawcliffe, Chief Financial Officer of Adaptimmune Therapeutics plc, a public limited company incorporated under English law (the “Company”), hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

 

1.                           The Transition Report on Form 20-F for the six months ended December 31, 2015 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                           The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: March 17, 2016

 
|   | /s/ Adrian Rawcliffe      |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | Adrian Rawcliffe          |
|   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
No. 11-9249.

#### Jackson *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 59 (Monday, March 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 17285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06314]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY: U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting agenda; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The U.S. Election Assistance Commission published a document 
in the Federal Register of March 21, 2022, regarding the scheduled 
meeting to vote on the Adoption of Voluntary Voting System Guidelines 
(VVSG) Lifecycle Policy 1.0. The notice contained an incorrect time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Kristen Muthig, Telephone: (202) 897-
9285, Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#03686e76776b6a64436662602d646c75"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8de6e0f8f9e5e4eacde8eceea3eae2fb">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In the Federal Register of March 21, 2022, in FR Doc. 2022-06025, 
on page 15982 in the first column, the DATES section should be 
corrected to read:

DATES: Tuesday, April 5, 2022, 2:30 p.m.-3:30 p.m. Eastern.

Amanda Joiner,
Acting General Counsel, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-06314 Filed 3-24-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>