alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 01-60829 Summary Calendar

__________________
NEIK SALEH SHARAF, Petitioner,

versus JOHN ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - - - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A29 809 846

- - - - - - - - - - - July 24, 2002 Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Neik Saleh Sharaf appeals the denial by the Board of Immigration Appeals (the Board) of his motion to reopen his deportation proceedings on the basis of changed country conditions. See 8 C.F.R. § 3.2 (2001). He argues that he will be persecuted by the Taliban upon his return to Afghanistan due to his former association with the Jamiat Islami military group.No. 01-60829 -2- Sharaf has failed to connect the change in government to his fear of persecution. He has therefore failed to demonstrate the requisite fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. See Efe v. Ashcroft , F.3d , 2002 WL 1209955, *5 (5th Cir. June 20, 2002). Moreover, the demise of the Taliban regime subsequent to the Board’s decision destroys Sharaf’s asylum claim. See United States v. Herrera-Ochoa , 245 F.3d 495, 501 (5th Cir. 2001). The Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Sharaf’s motion to reopen his deportation proceedings. INS v. Doherty , 502 U.S. 314, 322 (1992).
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 34.2



Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors

U.S. Bank National Association



We have examined management’s assertion,
included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association
(the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission’s Regulation AB for the U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform (the “Platform”),
for which the company provides trustee, securities administration, registrar and paying agent services, as of and for the year
ended March 31, 2016, except for servicing criteria 1122 (d)(1)(i)-(v), 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(2)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(v)-(vii),
1122 (d)(3)(i), 1122 (d)(4)(i)-(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them with
respect to the servicing platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those
servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance
with the servicing criteria based on our examination.



Our examination was conducted in accordance
with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.
Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the
Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed
those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our
procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered
by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to
our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this
report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.



In our opinion, management’s assertion
that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended March 31, 2016, for the
U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.



|                       | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|---------------------- | ---------------------
|Minneapolis, Minnesota |                      
|May 27, 2016           |
EXHIBIT 13.2

Certification by the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cellectis S.A. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eric Dutang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 21, 2016                                        
|                                                            
|/s/ Eric Dutang                                             
|Name: Eric Dutang                                           
|Title: Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jesus Abelardo DELGADO-GUTIERREZ, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40509 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 20, 2018

Ernest Gonzalez, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Texas, Plano, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Jesus Abelardo Delgado-Gutierrez, Pro Se

Before REAVLEY, CLEMENT, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Jesus Abelardo Delgado-Gutierrez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Delgado-Gutierrez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to . withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R.. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT
31.1


CERTIFICATIONS





I, Luis
F. Saenz, certify that:





1. I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Loreto Resources
Corporation.





2. Based on
my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;





4. I
am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have;





(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;





(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





(d)Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. I
have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of
registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report
financial information; and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:  April 14, 2009
              /s/ Luis F. SaenzLuis F. SaenzPrincipal
      Executive Officer
---

CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Christian Lown, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this report on
        Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Navient Student Loan Trust 2014-8 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, the
        Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
        misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the
        distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
 
 4. Based on my knowledge and the
        servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and
        administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and
 
 5. All of the reports on assessment
        of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item
        1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
        this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.
 
 [Signature Page Follows]
 
 
 Date:  March 29, 2019/s/ CHRISTIAN LOWNChristian LownPresident and Chief Financial Officer (Senior Securitization Officer)Navient Funding, LLC
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 184 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 184

   Expressing the sense of Congress that the motion picture industry 
         should work to discourage tobacco use among our youth.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 6, 1997

  Mr. Luther submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                 referred to the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of Congress that the motion picture industry 
         should work to discourage tobacco use among our youth.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 

SECTION 1. YOUTH TOBACCO USE.

Whereas addiction to tobacco by our youth represents a serious threat to the 
        individuals using tobacco and to those who inhale second hand smoke as 
        well as the public at large due to the increased health care costs for 
        tobacco related illness;
Whereas efforts to combat tobacco use among our youth is a goal common to 
        antismoking and smokers rights groups alike;
Whereas the President, the Food and Drug Administration, and public and private 
        health officials across the Nation are pursuing an agenda of 
        discouraging youth access to tobacco, and preventing of smoking and 
        tobacco use; and
Whereas while Government officials and agencies, together with the private 
        sector, can provide leadership in efforts to stop youth access to and 
        use of tobacco, success in this endeavor will be greatly enhanced by 
        additional voices and actions from across America: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that all individuals involved in 
the motion picture industry, including directors, actors, producers, 
and others, should recognize that the portrayal of tobacco use by 
actors projects cultural acceptance that negatively influences 
children, and that the industry should use its leadership role and 
voluntarily assist in discouraging youth tobacco use by eliminating the 
use of tobacco products in its productions, except for productions 
which portray the dangers of tobacco use.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Isaac MONGE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-10458

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 16, 2018 * San Francisco, California

Filed February 21, 2018

Robert Lally Miskell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USTU-Office of the US Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Cedric Martin Hopkins, Attorney, The Hopkins Law Office PC, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant

Before: BEA and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and LASNIK,** District Judge.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

The. Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Issac Monge appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

*701Monge argues that he is entitled to a sentence reduction under United States Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 782. We review “de novo whether a district court has jurisdiction to modify an otherwise final sentence.” *United States v. Waters,*771 F.3d 679, 680 (9th Cir. 2014) (per curiam). A district court has jurisdiction to modify an imposed sentence where the “defendant .., has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission.” 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Monge is not eligible for sentence reduction, because his sentence was not “based on” a subsequently lowered sentencing range. *Id.; see also United States v. Rodriguez-Soriano,*855 F.3d 1040, 1042 (9th Cir. 2017). Neither the prosecution nor the defense argued for a sentence reduction based on the Guidelines, and the district court did not impose a sentence based on the applicable Guidelines range. Rather, the district court stated (1) it was departing substantially below both the Guidelines and the mandatory minimum; and (2) the sentence was based on Monge’s conduct herein.

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32

                         CERTIFICATION OF 10-QSB REPORT
                                       OF
                         CHADMOORE WIRELESS GROUP, INC.
                      FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2006



1.       The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
         Officer of Chadmoore  Wireless Group,  Inc. This  Certification is made
         pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002.  This
         Certification  accompanies  the  10-QSB  Report of  Chadmoore  Wireless
         Group, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2006.

2.       We certify that such 10-QSB Report fully complies with the requirements
         of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and
         that the information  contained in such 10-QSB Report fairly  presents,
         in all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of
         operations of Chadmoore Wireless Group, Inc.



This Certification is executed as of May 12, 2006.



                                     /s/ ROBERT W. MOORE
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Robert W. Moore, Chief Executive Officer


                                     /s/ STEPHEN K. RADUSCH
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Stephen K. Radusch, Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to  Chadmoore  Wireless  Group,  Inc. and will be retained by Chadmoore
Wireless Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities  Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

This certificate  accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it relates, is not deemed
filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission  and is not  incorporated  by
reference into any filing of Chadmoore Wireless Group, Inc. under the Securities
Act of 1933,  as amended,  or the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  as amended
(whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB),  irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Bay Resources  Ltd.
(the  "Company")  for the three months ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "report"),  the
undersigned,  Peter  Lee,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1)  The report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: Febraury 11, 2004
                                        /s/ Peter Lee
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Peter Lee
                                        Director, Secretary and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|                                      |                                                                                                                                             |                                    |
|-------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
| Date: February              20, 2007 |                                                                                                                                                  | /s/              Michael O’Reilly |
|                                      | Name: Michael                O’ReillyPresident                and Chief Executive Officer(Principal                Executive Officer) |

|                                      |                                                                                                                          |                                    |
|-------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
| Date: February              20, 2007 |                                                                                                                               | /s/              Arthur J. Wasserspring |
|                                      | Name:                Arthur J. WasserspringChief                Financial Officer(Principal                Financial Officer) |

----