alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-82,323-03

EX P ARTE WILL IE DAVIS, JR., Appl icant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 18672 IN THE 329 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM WHARTON COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1
. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleade d guilty and was convicted of possession of a controlled substance in a drug fre e zone and sentenc ed to twenty -five y ear s’ imprisonment. He did not appea l his conviction. Applicant contends, among other things, that his trial counsel rende red ineffe ctive assistance beca use he failed to investigate, failed to litigate the pre- trial motions such as the motion to suppress, failed to challeng e the drug repor t which showed a

lack of evidenc e, and failed to file a motion to2

dismiss due to lack of

evidenc e. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief
. Strickland v. W

ashington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson , 993 S.W .2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. The trial court
s h all order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of i neff ective assistance of counsel
. T h e trial court may

use any means set out in T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d)
. I f t he trial court elects t o h o l d a hearing , it shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the t ri al court shall appoint an attorney to repre sent Applicant at the hearing. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. The trial co u rt shall make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law as to whether the perf ormanc e of Applicant’s trial counsel was defic ient and, if so, wh et h er counsel’s defic ient perf ormanc e prejudice d Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other finding s of fac t and conclusions of law that it deems rele vant and appropr iate to the dispositi on of Applicant’s claim for habea s corpus re lief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues sh al l b e re s o l ved within 90 day s of this order
. A supplemental transcript containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, alongwith the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be forwar ded to this Court withi n 120 day s of the date of t his order
. Any extensions of t ime shall be obtained f

rom this Court.
Filed: Apr il 22, 2015 Do not publish
21 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Honorable X. 0. Shafer 

Cnllmt~ ‘tttarfle~ 

Zctor County 

Odessa, Tsxa* 

Opinion no. O-7206 

Ilet Legal it7 of a Ju&i 

3 

e of the 

Pease el eated in ion precinct 

ln holdinK his ofulae after 

t.he nhore 

Your request for an ;;mls D%$pon 

t.he nhore rrubject-matter ia as f 

*I would be very .&?ratkfu<for. >he 

“0”~ department concerning: Qe 

pinion Of 

f--l \ 

questions: 

ther preainat, 

. 3, and malnrecinat No. 3? 

forepoing question 

y,% such Ju’stioe of the Peace from the off,lck he ~a1 halda in Preainct X0. 21” 

_’ 

Ikn&er to your first question, we beE to advise that 

mere chance of residence of the Justice of the Peace to another 

precinct t.han that in whiah he resided and was elected does not 

operate in law ta create a vacancy In such offiae. The colnmlasIrners’ Court -av not determine judlciallf whether or not a vacancy c?oes exist. (See Our 07+3ion Y0 s O-3047). 

the Corn--isnloners’ Court, however 

It Is the duty of 

, to anpoint a JUBtiCe, if there 

Is in fnct a vacancy such as the law contemplates In bestowing upon it t,he newer to ryyolnt. (See our Oplnlbn \lo. O-2361) 
r;onnrn’trle 5. 0. Shafer - vakye 1 

brtiale 6970 of the Revised Ci+il St8tutei authorizea 

th,? ristrfat Court to remove a Justlae of the .Peaoe *fop lnoomretmcv, ottialal daoondnot’, of aatom. Arfiale 6972 deflnoa 

nIns~netOue~m 6 This statute 1s the applfaable aktute In a prop 

or ease Tar removing a Juatiao of' the Peaao. 

Ue have no sUffiai8nt lnfonsaflam aa to the faotm cxrd 

clraumatan~sr surrounding the removal of the Juatlem of thr Peaar 

Involved, aad ufo not frmnlshsd With lnfolartion that wduld autborlse us to venture an opinion thether or not mounds for removal es.- 

ist, and ve expreaa no opinion whatever as to that pa~bt. 

4e trust tbmt what we have said fmRllSia~t?mtl~ anawerm 

~i)ur questions. 

cI 

I’ 0 .r) 

. 

.. 7 

.L 

..- 

_ ,:A 

BJ d2L 

Oaie & or 

ASS1 S;rAHT
REVERE
INVESTMENTS L.P.


 


October
31, 2017


 


Marathon
Patent Group, Inc.


11601
Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 500


Los
Angeles, CA 90025


 


Attn:
Francis Knuettel II, Chief Financial Officer


 


Dear
Mr. Knuettel:


 


This
letter is confirmation that, effective on the closing of the merger pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger
among Marathon Patent Group, Inc., Global Bit Acquisitions Corp., and Global Bit Ventures Inc., in connection with certain convertible
notes issued by Marathon Patent Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on August 31, 2017 and September 28, 2017 to Revere Investments
L.P. in the principal amounts of $3,448,500 and $1,846,300, respectively, (“Notes”), the Beneficial Ownership Limitation
as defined in Section 4(d) of the Notes is amended to 2.49%, subject to an increase of up to 9.99% upon 61 days’ notice.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	REVERE INVESTMENTS L.P.
	 	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ John O’Rourke
	 	Name:	John O’Rourke
	 	Title:	Authorized signatory


 


Confirmed
and Acknowledged:


 


Marathon
Patent Group, Inc.


 


	By:
    	/s/ Francis Knuettel,
    II	 
	Name:	Francis Knuettel, II	 
	Title:	Chief Financial Officer
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 287

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the President should take certain

actions to address violence in schools in the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 5, 1998

Mr. FORD (for himself, Ms. CARSON, Mr. HOLDEN, Ms. STABENOW, Mr.

FROST, Mr. DIAZ-BALART, and Mr. SANDLIN) submitted the following

concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education

and the Workforce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the President

should take certain actions to address violence in schools

in the United States.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 President should—

4 (1) initiate a series of town meetings across the

5 Nation to discuss ways to address the growing crisis

6 of violence in schools in the United States; and

7 (2) call upon States and localities to improve

8 communication between law enforcement officials

9 and students, parents, and teachers, by means in-
2

•HCON 287 IH

1 cluding the establishment of school violence preven2 tion hotlines to inform law enforcement officials

3 when threats of violence are made at school.

Æ
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 30, 2020

a0923 

# Order

Clerk September 30, 2020

160469

- 71

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 160469

- 71

COA: 342394, 342395, 342396

Macomb CC: 2017

- 000447

- FC,

2017

- 001859

- FC,

2017

- 001865

- FC

ANTHONY JOSEPH VEACH,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On ord er of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 15, 2019

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Macomb County

Prosecuting Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after

the date of this order.

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.
No. 11-10824.

#### In re Allen.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
**EXHIBIT ITEM 31.1**

 

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

 

I, Charles T.Chrietzberg, Jr. certify that:

 

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB, Amendment No.1 of NorthernCalifornia Bancorp, Inc.;

 

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:

 

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee orregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)     all significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  November 20, 2007 |   /s/  Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr. |   |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                     | Charles  T. Chrietzberg, Jr.                 |
|                     | Chairman  of the Board &                 |
|                     | Chief  Executive Officer                     |

 

----
#### COM. v. MILLER, S.

2085 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/08/2017

CP-38-CR-0002131-2015 (Lebanon)

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,164
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,230
<ALLOWANCES>                                       170
<INVENTORY>                                      1,659
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,155
<PP&E>                                           3,559
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,052
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,345
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        834
<COMMON>                                         7,364
<OTHER-SE>                                       (123)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,903
<SALES>                                          6,461
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,461
<CGS>                                            4,036
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,746
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 151
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (472)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        45
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (517)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (517)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)


</TABLE>
#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Bryan Anthony VENI, Petitioner

No. 566 MAL 2017

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

January 8, 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND. NOW, this 8th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
#### Douglas JAMES, AKA Monsho Abdullah, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jimmy CRUZEN, Correctional Officer; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-16008

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed December 20, 2017

Douglas James, Pro Se

Chad Allen Stegeman, Esquire, Attorney, California Department of Justice, San Francisco, CA, Erin Ganahl, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, AGCA—Office of the Attorney General, Oakland, CA, for Defendants-Appellees

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Douglas James, AKA Monsho Abdullah, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action related to congregational prayer. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Williams v. Paramo,*775 F.3d 1182, 1191 (9th Cir. 2015). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because James failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether he properly exhausted his administrative remedies, or whether there was “something in his particular case that made the existing and generally available administrative remedies effectively unavailable to him,” *Albino v. Baca,*747 F.3d 1162, 1172 (9th Cir. 2014) (en banc); *see also Woodford v. Ngo,*548 U.S. 81, 90, 126 S.Ct. 2378, 165 L.Ed.2d 368 (2006) (requiring proper exhaustion, which means “using all steps that the agency holds out, and doing so properly (so that the agency addresses the issues on the merits)” (empha*918sis, citation, and internal 'quotation marks omitted)). James contends that he exhausted under a “continuing violation" theory, but even if this court were to adopt such a theory, it would not apply in this case.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; RFA Panel: Tobacco Regulatory Science A.                    

*Date:*                         May 5, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Sepandarmaz Aschrafi, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4040D, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 451.4251,                         *Armaz.aschrafi@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 31, 2022.

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-07149 Filed 4-4-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# Službeni list C 114A/28.

| | ISSN 1977-1088 |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | C 114A |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Informacije i objave | Godište 61.28. ožujka 2018. |

ISSN 1977-1088

Službeni list

Europske unije

C 114A

Hrvatsko izdanje

Informacije i objave

Godište 61.28. ožujka 2018.

---

| Obavijest br. | Sadržaj | Stranica |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V.   Objave |
| | ADMINISTRATIVNI POSTUPCI |
| | Europski parlament |
| 2018/C 114 A/01 | Selekcijski postupak PE/199/S – Privremeni službenik – pomoćnik u upravi (AD 5) – Popis uspješnih kandidata | 1 |

Obavijest br.

Sadržaj

Stranica

V.   Objave

ADMINISTRATIVNI POSTUPCI

Europski parlament

2018/C 114 A/01

Selekcijski postupak PE/199/S – Privremeni službenik – pomoćnik u upravi (AD 5) – Popis uspješnih kandidata

1

---

| HR | |
| --- | --- |

HR

---

V. Objave

ADMINISTRATIVNI POSTUPCI

Europski parlament

| 28.3.2018 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | CA 114/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2018

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

CA 114/1

---

SELEKCIJSKI POSTUPAK PE/199/S

Privremeni službenik – pomoćnik u upravi (AD 5)

POPIS USPJEŠNIH KANDIDATA

(2018/C 114 A/01)

| 1. | FISCHER, Jessica Isabell |
| --- | --- |

1.

FISCHER, Jessica Isabell

| 2. | LEMAIRE, Cléo |
| --- | --- |

2.

LEMAIRE, Cléo

| 3. | COURTADE, Christelle |
| --- | --- |

3.

COURTADE, Christelle

Popis uspješnih kandidata prestaje važiti 31. prosinca 2020.

---
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 99.2

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                        OF SPINNAKER EXPLORATION COMPANY
                         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Spinnaker
Exploration Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September
30, 2002 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert M. Snell, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

         1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.


         /s/ ROBERT M. SNELL
         --------------------------------------------
         Name:  Robert M. Snell
         Title: Chief Financial Officer
         Date:  November 12, 2002
No. 11-1419.

#### Shaw Coastal, Inc. *v.*Cherry.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 10.5


 





 


July 6th,
2017


 


	Attn:	Dr. Curt LaBelle
	Re:	Engagement Letter for Professional Services


 


Dear Dr. LaBelle:


 


On behalf of Eyenovia,
Inc. (the “Company”), I am pleased to extend our professional services agreement outlining Cura Partners engagement
as an operating Board member, Head of Operations and BD.


 


Starting July 1st,
2017, you will provide services not to exceed 2 days a week with compensation as a consultant. In this capacity, you will be paid
$9,567 per month and for any additional work at the rate of $250 per hour.


 


In addition, the Board
is approving a total of 500,000 options. 75% of the total option package will be granted now and will start vesting immediately
in thirty-six (36) equal monthly installments. The additional 25% of the options will be bestowed within 12 months and will be
based on meeting pre-specified milestones as proposed by you and approved by management.


 


As a condition of
your engagement, you will be required to sign the Company’s standard form of nondisclosure and assignment agreement (a copy
of which is enclosed), and to provide the Company with documents establishing your identity and right to work in the United States.


 


The Company may terminate
this agreement: (i) for convenience, upon one hundred twenty (120) days written notice to Consultant; or (ii) immediately for Consultant’s
failure to satisfactorily perform his/her duties described above or for Consultant’s breach of any of his/her obligations
under this agreement.


 


We look forward to working with you at the
Company. Please sign and date this letter on the spaces provided below to acknowledge your acceptance of the terms of this agreement.


 


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	/s/
    Tsontcho Ianchulev
	 	Tsontcho
    Ianchulev, MD 
	 	CEO- Eyenovia,
    Inc.
	 	 
	 	The foregoing
    terms are hereby understood and accepted:
	 	 	 
	 	Signed:	/s/ Curt
    LaBelle




 


www.eyenoviabio.com