alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_____________ No. 96-2030NE

_____________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District v. * of Nebraska. * Scott A. Schneider, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

_____________ Submitted: August 7, 1996 Filed: August 12, 1996

_____________ Before FAGG, BRIGHT, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM.

Scott A. Schneider appeals the district court's order revokin g Schneider's three-year term of supervised release and imposing seven month s of imprisonment follo wed by either 26 or 29 months of supervised release. Where an oral sentence and the written judgment conflict, the oral sentenc e controls. See United States v. Tramp , 30 F.3d 1035, 1037 (8th Cir. 1994) (concerning concurrent versus consecutive senten ces). But cf. Holloway v. United S tates , 960 F.2d 1348, 1358 (8th Cir. 1992) (ambiguities i n senten cing pronouncement are to be construed in favor of defendant)
. Coun sel's brief notes this discrepancy (Counsel's Br. at 3 n.3), bu t Schnei der's brief refers to the "26-month term of supervised release " (Supp. Br. at 5). We suggest the district court clarify the discrepancy between the oral and written record by an appropriate statement or order in the district court record. Turning to Schneider's appeal, counsel has filed a brief under

### -2-

Ande rs v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Schneider has filed a supplemental brief. Schneider and his counsel i nvite this court to depart from E ighth Circuit precedent holding that supervised release may b e reimpo sed after a term of imprisonment upon revocation of supervise d release. Simply stated, their invitation is foreclosed by our earlie r holdings. See United States v. Stewart , 7 F.3d 1350, 1352 (8th Cir. 1993) ; Uni ted States v. Schrader , 973 F.2d 623, 625 (8th Cir. 1992). Havin g reviewed the record, we find no nonfrivolous issues. See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988). We affirm the judgment of the district court.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### IN RE: ADOPTION OF: BABY BOY G.

9 MDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/07/2017

2016-4124 (Centre)

Affirmed
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 353 Agreed to House (ATH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 353

Providing for the sine die adjournment of the second session of the One 
                        Hundred Fifth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 20, 1998

 Mr. Solomon submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the sine die adjournment of the second session of the One 
                        Hundred Fifth Congress.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Wednesday, 
October 21, 1998, or Thursday, October 22, 1998, on a motion offered 
pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 
designee, it stand adjourned sine die, or until noon on the second day 
after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, or until a time designated pursuant to section 3 
of this resolution; and that when the Senate adjourns on Wednesday, 
October 21, 1998, or Thursday, October 22, 1998, on a motion offered 
pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 
designee, if stand adjourned sine die, or until noon on the second day 
after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
    Sec. 3. During any adjournment of the House pursuant to this 
concurrent resolution, the Speaker, acting after consultation with the 
Minority Leader, may notify the Members of the House to reassemble 
whenever, in his opinion, the public interest shall warrant it. After 
reassembling pursuant to this section, when the House adjourns on any 
day on a motion offered pursuant to this section by its Majority Leader 
or his designee, the House shall again stand adjourned pursuant to the 
first section of this concurrent resolution.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 4.15


 


English Language Summary


 


Authorization Agreement for Conditional Access Service– Termo Autorização de Serviço de Acesso Condicionado No. 23/2013


 



	
Parties:

	
Telefônica Brasil S.A., as authorizee, and Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações (ANATEL), as grantor.


	 	 
	
Date:

	
March 18, 2013.


	 	 
	
Term:

	
Indefinite


	 	 
	
Purpose:

	
Authorization to provide Conditional Access Service in private regime.


	 	 
	
Area:

	
Entire Brazilian territory.


	 	 
	
Amount:

	
The amount owed under the grant is R$9,000.00, which was paid at the time of execution of the Authorization Agreement.


	 	 
	
Penalty:

	
Breach of the Authorization Agreement and applicable regulations to Multimedia Communication Services may result in administrative proceedings by ANATEL, the application of warning sanctions, fines, temporary suspension or revocation of licenses.
Exhibit 4.2


 


 


 


 


 


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







We have issued our report dated October 10, 2017, with respect to the financial statement of Alaia Market Linked Trust Series 4-3, comprising the Strategas Policy Basket Portfolio, contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-220579) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”.


 


 


 


/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP


 


 


 


Chicago, Illinois


October 10, 2017
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      The undersigned hereby certify that the Form 10-Q/A of Windswept
Environmental Group, Inc. for the period ended September 27, 2005, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Windswept Environmental Group, Inc. for the periods presented.


                                        /s/ Michael O'Reilly
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: Michael O'Reilly
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
                                        (principal executive officer)

Date: October 19, 2006


                                        /s/ Arthur Wasserspring
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: Arthur Wasserspring
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        (principal financial officer)

Date: October 19, 2006
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification** **Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




Securities
      and Exchange Commission


450
      Fifth
      Street, N.W


Washington,
      D.C. 20549


Ladies
      and Gentlemen:





The
      certification set forth below is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule
      15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and with Section 1350 of
      Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.





Martin
      Wade III, the Chief Executive Officer of International Microcomputer Software,
      Inc, and Robert O’Callahan, the Chief Financial Officer of International
      Microcomputer Software, Inc, each certifies that:




1.
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




2.
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                International Microcomputer Software,
                Inc.







By: **/s/
      MARTIN WADE III**


Martin
      Wade III


Chief
      Executive Officer





By: **/s/ ROBERT O’CALLAHAN**


Robert
      O’Callahan


Chief
      Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)








41
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE REPORT ON FORM 10-Q OF BAYOU INTERNATIONAL LTD FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> AUSTRALIAN DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-20-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  .7901
<CASH>                                             113
<SECURITIES>                                         3
<RECEIVABLES>                                       54
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   170
<PP&E>                                              52
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     622
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              305
<BONDS>                                          2,209
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,388
<OTHER-SE>                                    (11,360)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       622
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     6
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   215
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (241)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (241)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (374)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
IA

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 13

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States with

respect to the right to life.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 7, 1997

Mrs. EMERSON introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States with respect to the right to life.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid only

6 when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the

7 several States within seven years after the date of final

8 passage of this joint resolution:
2

•HJ 13 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. With respect to the right to life, the

3 word ‘person’ as used in this article and in the fifth and

4 fourteenth articles of amendment applies to all human

5 beings irrespective of age, health, function, or condition

6 of dependency, including their unborn offspring at every

7 state of their biological development.

8 ‘‘SECTION 2. No unborn person shall be deprived of

9 life by any person: Provided, however, That nothing in this

10 article shall prohibit a law permitting only those medical

11 procedures required to prevent the death of the mother

12 of an unborn person: Provided further, That nothing in

13 this article shall limit the liberty of a mother with respect

14 to the unborn offspring of the mother conceived as a result

15 of rape or incest.

16 ‘‘SECTION 3. The Congress and the several States

17 shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate leg18 islation.’’.

Æ
No. 11-1513.

#### FreeEats.com, Inc. *v.*Indiana.

Sup. Ct. Ind. Certiorari denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6457

HERMAN K. SIMPSON, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus ELDRIDGE E. HODGE; MICHAEL YORK; J. WATKINS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge. (CA-01-806-1) Submitted: June 11, 2002 Decided: July 22, 2002 Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. Herman K. Simpson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Herman K. Simpson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint filed under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001), for failure to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2001). Simpson also appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We dismiss in part and affirm in part. Parties in a civil action, in which the United States is not a party, are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order denying § 1983 relief was entered on the docket on November 6, 2001. Simpson’s notice of appeal was filed on March 14, 2002. Because Simpson failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss this portion of the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. With regard to the denial of the Rule 60(b) motion, we have reviewed the record, the district court’s order, and Simpson’s3 informal brief filed in this court. Because Simpson failed to challenge on appeal the district court’s disposition of the Rule 60(b) motion, he has waived appellate review of that order. 4th Cir. R. 34(b). We therefore affirm this portion of the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Simpson , No. CA-01-806-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 19, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART AND DISMISSED IN PART
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Siebel
Systems, Inc. quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2000  and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                                Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                  MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                           568,347
<SECURITIES>                                                     305,443
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    296,621
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               1,284,903
<PP&E>                                                            78,987
<DEPRECIATION>                                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 1,428,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            320,129
<BONDS>                                                          300,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<COMMON>                                                             199
<OTHER-SE>                                                       806,766
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   1,428,533
<SALES>                                                          190,912
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 309,439
<CGS>                                                             74,776
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    172,938
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  12,888
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   74,613
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      28,356
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               46,257
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      46,257
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0.19



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Windswept Environmental Group, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 29, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Michael
OReilly, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Charles L. Kelly,
Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |                          
| | -------------------------
| | /s/ Michael O'Reilly     
| | Michael O'Reilly         
| | President and            
| | Chief Executive Officer  
|
| | /s/ Charles L. Kelly, Jr.
| | Charles L. Kelly, Jr.    
| | Chief Financial Officer  
| | Dated May 13, 2005
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of CHDT Corporation on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2010, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Report”), I, Stewart Wallach, Chief Executive Officer of the Company of
the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.








/s/ Stewart
Wallach


Stewart
Wallach


CEO,
Director


(Principal
Executive Officer)








August
13th, 2010








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Presidential Documents

18963 

Federal Register 

Vol. 87, No. 62 

Thursday, March 31, 2022 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of March 30, 2022 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities 

On April 1, 2015, by Executive Order 13694, the President declared a national 

emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act 

(50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat 

to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States 

constituted by the increasing prevalence and severity of malicious cyberenabled activities originating from, or directed by persons located, in whole 

or in substantial part, outside the United States. On December 28, 2016, 

the President issued Executive Order 13757 to take additional steps to address 

the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13694. 

These significant malicious cyber-enabled activities continue to pose an 

unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, 

and economy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency 

declared on April 1, 2015, must continue in effect beyond April 1, 2022. 

Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies 

Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency 

declared in Executive Order 13694. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

March 30, 2022. 

[FR Doc. 2022–07025 

Filed 3–30–22; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3395–F2–P 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PREZ DOC 3BIDEN.EPS</GPH>