alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



                  Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

     In  connection  with the filing by Millennia  Inc.  (the  "Company") of the
Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September  30,  2008 (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies:

         1.       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial respects,  the financial
                  condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                       Date:  October 14, 2008

                                        /s/  Kevin B. Halter
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Kevin B. Halter, Chief Executive Officer
                                       and Chief Financial Officer
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8366 

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to increase the amount of 

the allowable homestead exemption. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2020 

Ms. DEAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to increase 

the amount of the allowable homestead exemption. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Home5 owners in Bankruptcy Act of 2020’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASING THE HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION. 

7 Section 522 of title 11 of the United States Code, 

8 is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (d)(1) by striking ‘‘$15,000’’ 

10 and inserting ‘‘$100,000’’; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8366 IH

1 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

2 ‘‘(r) Notwithstanding any other provision of applica3 ble nonbankruptcy law, a debtor in any State may exempt 

4 from property of the estate the property described in sub5 section (d)(1) not to exceed the value in subsection (d)(1) 

6 if the exemption for such property permitted by applicable 

7 nonbankruptcy law is lower than that amount.’’. 

8 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS. 

9 (a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Except as provided in sub10 section (b), this Act and the amendments made by this 

11 Act shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this 

12 Act. 

13 (b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.—The amend14 ments made by this Act shall not apply to cases com15 menced under title of the United States Code before the 

16 effective date of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8325 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8325

To amend the Families First Coronavirus Response Act to extend National 
 School Lunch Program requirement waivers addressing COVID-19, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 21, 2020

 Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois (for himself, Mr. Costa, Mr. Bacon, and 
 Ms. Spanberger) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Families First Coronavirus Response Act to extend National 
 School Lunch Program requirement waivers addressing COVID-19, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Operation Feed Our Kids Act''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM REQUIREMENT WAIVERS ADDRESSING 
              COVID-19.

    (a) Extension of Sunset Date.--Section 2202(e) of the Families 
First Coronavirus Response Act (42 U.S.C. 1760 note) is amended by 
striking ``September 30, 2020.'' and inserting ``December 31, 2021.''.
    (b) Extension of Prior Waivers.--During the 30-day period beginning 
on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture 
shall extend through at least the end of the 2020-2021 school year at 
least each waiver available under section 2202 of the Families First 
Coronavirus Response Act (42 U.S.C. 1760 note) that is, as of September 
11, 2020, set to expire on December 31, 2020.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--For an additional amount for 
``Agricultural Programs--Domestic Food Programs--Food and Nutrition 
Service--Child Nutrition Programs'', there are authorized to be 
appropriated such sums as may be necessary, to remain available until 
December 31, 2021, to carry out sections 2102 and 2202 of the Families 
First Coronavirus Response Act (42 U.S.C. 1760 note), as amended by 
subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1

                               February 21, 1996



Gamma Biologicals, Inc.
3700 Mangum Road
Houston, Texas  77092

Gentlemen:

     We have acted as counsel for Gamma Biologicals, Inc., a Texas corporation
(the "Company") in connection with the registration, pursuant to a Registration
Statement on Form S-8 being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Registration Statement") under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, of
the offering and sale to certain officers and key employees of the Company of up
to 250,000 shares of the Company's common stock, $0.10 per share par value
("Common Stock"), which may be issued upon the exercise of incentive stock
options (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended) and/or
non-qualified stock options (all such stock options being collectively referred
to herein as the "Options").

     In such capacity, we have examined the corporate documents of the Company,
including its Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation dated July 21,
1983, as amended to date, its Amended and Restated Bylaws dated April 13, 1990,
and resolutions adopted by its board of directors and committees thereof.  We
have also examined the Registration Statement, together with the exhibits
thereto, and such other documents which we have deemed necessary for the
purposes of expressing the opinion contained herein.  We have relied upon
representations made by and certificates of officers of the Company and public
officials with respect to certain facts material to our opinion.  We have made
no independent investigation regarding such representations and certificates.

     Based on the foregoing, we are of the opinion that when the Options have
been duly exercised in accordance with their respective terms, the Common Stock
issued thereupon will be validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.
<PAGE>
 
Gamma Biologicals, Inc.
February 20, 1996
Page -2-



     We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement.

                                         Very truly yours,

                                             [SIGNATURE APPEARS HERE]
                                         --------------------------------
                                         /s/ LIDDELL, SAPP, ZIVLEY, HILL
                                             & LABOON, L.L.P.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT





I, Blair Mills, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Broadcaster, Inc;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-(15e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared:



b. [Paragraph omitted];



c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.





Date: November 20, 2006



By:  /s/ Blair Mills

Blair Mills

Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
#### Kathleen M. WATSON, as an individual, and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Barton M. Watson, as an individual, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-15890

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted January 16, 2018 *

Filed January 19, 2018

Barton M. Watson, Barton Marshall Watson, AAL, A Law Corp., Honolulu, HI, for Plaintiffs-Appellants

*501Sondra Hemeryck, Riley, Safer, Holmes & Candía LLP, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: REINHARDT, TROTT, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Kathleen M. Watson and Barton M. Watson appeal from the district court’s judgment dismissing their action alleging federal and state law claims arising from defendant’s baggage policy. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a denial of leave to amend a complaint. *See Serra v. Lappin,*600 F.3d 1191, 1195 (9th Cir. 2010). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the Watson’s complaint without leave to amend because the deficiencies of the complaint could not be cured by amendment. *See id,*at 1200 (leave to amend may be denied where amendment would be futile).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in not converting defendant’s motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment because the district court did not rely on materials outside of the pleadings. *See Davis v. HSBC Bank Nev., N.A.,*691 F.3d 1152, 1159-60 (9th Cir. 2012) (standard of review); *Keams v. Tempe Tech. Inst., Inc.,*110 F.3d 44, 46 (9th Cir. 1997) (a motion to dismiss need not be converted into a motion for summary judgment when nothing in the record suggests reliance by the district court on materials that are outside of the pleadings).

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal, or matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n. 2 (9th Cir. 2009).

We reject as unsupported by the record the Watson’s contentions that the district court applied the incorrect law regarding their breach of contract claim and ignored claims related to the third class action members.

AFFIRMED.

**

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pawel Sebastian SZKUTNIK, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-30088

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 13, 2018 *

Filed February 16, 2018

Justin Arnold, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Helen J. Brunner, Esquire, Assistant U.S, Attorney, Michael Lang, Assistant U.S. Attorney, DOJ-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Nancy Tenney, FPDWA — Federal Public Defender’s Office, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellant

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and . MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.-

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R, App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Pawel Sebastian Szkutnik appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 16-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Szkutnik contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to use the Guidelines range as the starting point at sentencing, instead sentencing him based on a determination made at a previous hearing. Szkutnik also argues that the court failed to explain the sentence adequately. We review for plain error, *see United States v. Valencia-Barragan,*608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir. 2010), and conclude that there is none. The record reflects that the court considered the uncontested Guidelines range, but concluded that an above-Guidelines sentence was warranted in light of Szkutnik’s poor performance on supervised release. The court’s explanation was sufficient. *See United States v. Carty,*520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). Moreover, the court’s imposition of a 16-month sentence belies Szkutnik’s argument that the court placed undue reliance on its remark at a prior revocation hearing that any future violations would result in an 18-month sentence.

Szkutnik also contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable. The district court did not abuse its discretion. *See Gall*
      *451
      *V. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51,128 S.Ct. 586,169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). The 16-month sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including Szkutnik’s history on supervised release and failure to be deterred by prior prison terms. *See Gall,*552 U.S. at 51,128 S.Ct. 586.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publi-fcation and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 133

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the

July 30, 1997.terrorist bombing in the Jerusalem market on
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 133

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas on July 30, 1997, two terrorist bombs exploded almost simultaneously in the open market in Jerusalem

killing at least 13 people and wounding more than 150

others; and

Whereas this attack is a violent and vicious assault against

the peace process and against citizens of Israel: Now,

therefore, be it
2

•HCON 133 EH

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) Expresses the deep condolences of the Con4 gress and the American people to the families of the

5 victims and to the people of Israel for the loss of life

6 and the serious injuries that have been suffered in

7 the terrorist bombing in the Jerusalem market and

8 expresses the solidarity of the American people with

9 the people of Israel in the face of this tragic and

10 senseless act;

11 (2) Reaffirms the determination of the Con12 gress to join with the government of Israel in fight13 ing against international terrorism;

14 (3) Urges Yassir Arafat and officials of the Pal15 estinian Authority to undertake immediately un16 equivocal action to bring to justice leaders of terror17 ist organizations and extremist groups and to elimi18 nate all weapons and explosives in the hands of such

19 groups;

20 (4) Reaffirms the commitment of the Congress

21 of the United States to the peace process in the

22 Middle East and urges all parties to work together

23 to bring lasting peace and security without violence

24 and terrorism to that region; and
3

•HCON 133 EH

1 (5) Urges the President and appropriate Execu2 tive agencies to provide all appropriate assistance to

3 the government of Israel to provide medical and

4 other assistance to the victims of this terrorist act,

5 to bring to justice the terrorist leaders behind this

6 and similar acts of violence, and to work to prevent

7 such terrorist acts in the future.

Passed the House of Representatives July 30, 1997.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code),  I, Ashley C.
Andersen,  President and Chief Executive  Officer of Trudy Corporation do hereby
certify, to the best of my knowledge that:

     1)   The  Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended
          December  31,  2007  being  filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange
          Commission  (the  "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as
          amended; and

     2)   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

This Certification  accompanies this Form 10-QSB as an exhibit, but shall not be
deemed as having  been  filed  for  purposes  of  Section  18 of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or as a separate  disclosure document of the Company or the
certifying officer.

                                      TRUDY CORPORATION
                                      (REGISTRANT)

Date: February 19, 2008               By: /s/ Ashley C. Andersen
                                          --------------------------------------
                                      Ashley C. Andersen,
                                      President, Chief Executive Officer
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 13-543V 

Filed: February 19, 2016 

Not for Publication 

************************************* 

KEVIN McERLEAN, * 

* 

Petitioner, * 

 * 

v. * 

 * 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * 

 * 

 Respondent. * 

* 

************************************* 

Donald M. Gerstein, Cheyenne, WY, for petitioner. 

Lara A. Englund, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On February 19, 2016, the parties filed the attached stipulation in which they agreed to 

settle this case and described the settlement terms. Petitioner alleges that he suffered from 

winged scapula that was caused by his receipt of influenza (“flu”) vaccine on or about October 20, 

2011. He further alleges that he experienced the residual effects of this injury for more than six 

months. Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner to suffer winged scapula or any 

other injury. Nonetheless, the parties agreed to resolve this matter informally.

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this 

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal 

Claims’ website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal 

Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).. Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all 

decisions of the special masters will be made available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or 

commercial or financial information that is privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information 

whose disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is 

filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to delete such information prior to the document’s 

disclosure. If the special master, upon review, agrees that the identified material fits within the banned 

categories listed above, the special master shall delete such material from public access.

Damages decision based on 

stipulation; influenza (“flu”) 

vaccine; winged scapula

 
 The undersigned finds the terms of the stipulation to be reasonable. The court hereby 

adopts the parties’ said stipulation, attached hereto, and awards compensation in the amount and 

on the terms set forth therein. Pursuant to the stipulation, the court awards a lump sum of 

$200,000.00, representing compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. 

§ 300aa-15(a) (2012). The award shall be in the form of a check for $200,000.00 made payable to 

petitioner. 

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the 

court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 19, 2016 s/ Laura D. Millman

 Laura D. Millman

 Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or 

jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of
Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer
of VCA Antech, Inc.

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies this quarterly report on Form 10-Q
(the Report) for the period ended September 30, 2003 of VCA Antech, Inc. (the
Issuer).

Each of the undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, respectively, of VCA Antech, Inc., hereby certify that, to
the best of each such officers knowledge:



| | (i)  |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | ---- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Issuer.       

Dated: November 12, 2003

| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ Robert L. Antin    
| |  |                        
| |  | Robert L. Antin        
| |  | Chief Executive Officer
| |  |                        
| |  | /s/ Tomas W. Fuller    
| |  |                        
| |  | Tomas W. Fuller        
| |  | Chief Financial Officer