alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8331 

To provide a funding limitation on funds appropriated under the CARES 

Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2020 

Mr. POSEY (for himself, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. SPANO, and 

Mr. CLOUD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide a funding limitation on funds appropriated under 

the CARES Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Accountability for 

5 CARES Act of 2020’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FUNDING LIMITATION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—None of the funds appropriated 

8 under the CARES Act (Public Law 116–136) may be pro9 vided to an entity that is under the foreign ownership, con10 trol, or influence of— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8331 IH

1 (1) the Government of the People’s Republic of 

2 China; 

3 (2) the Chinese Communist Party; or 

4 (3) an entity domiciled in the People’s Republic 

5 of China. 

6 (b) CLAWBACK.—The Secretary of the Treasury, in 

7 consultation with the Secretary of State, shall recover all 

8 of the amounts appropriated under the CARES Act that 

9 were provided to entities described in subsection (a). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Julie A. Roberts v. Nexus Health Systems, Inc., et al.

Appellate case number: 01-19-00175-CV

Trial court case number: 2016-84120

Trial court: 334th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Julie A. Roberts, has filed a “Joint Motion to Stay Appeal Pending Bankruptcy Court 

Review and Approval of Settlement.” The motion requests that the appeal be “stayed,” while the 

parties seek approval of their settlement from the Bankruptcy Court. 

Roberts request for a stay is interpreted as a request to abate the appeal. As interpreted, the 

motion is granted, and the appeal is abated.

The appeal is removed from the Court’s October 27, 2020 submission docket and oral argument 

is cancelled.

The appeal will be reinstated 60 days from the date of this order on the Court’s active docket for 

later submission on the merits. However, a party may file a motion to reinstate the appeal for 

dismissal or for submission on the merits before the expiration of 60 days. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Richard Hightower___________

 Acting individually 

Date: October 26, 2020
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Golub Capital Investment Corporation and Subsidiaries (the “Registrant”) for the annual period ended September 30, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ross A. Teune, as Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:


|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

/s/ Ross A. TeuneName: Ross A. TeuneTitle:  Chief Financial Officer


Date: November 28, 2018
# The 46 US Labs in Ukraine and the $200 Pentagon Program That Sparked a Propaganda War:

/ Published March 5, 2022

By Geoff Earle and Harriet Alexander | March 5, 2022 | Daily Mail

"A Pentagon program meant to secure and dismantle weapons of mass destruction across 46 Ukrainian laboratories has helped fuel a propaganda war accusing the US of funding bioweapons research."

**Read More...**
Exhibit 99.1

Certification Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Thomas M. Siebel, Chairman and CEO of Siebel Systems, Inc. (the "Company"), and Kenneth A. Goldman, Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge:

1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1 (the "Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 15th day of May, 2003.

|/s/ Thomas M. Siebel
Thomas M. Siebel 
Chairman and CEO 
(Principal Executive Officer) | /s/ Kenneth A. Goldman
Kenneth A. Goldman
Senior Vice President, Finance and
  Administration and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certification "accompanies" the Periodic Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Period Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32

                         CERTIFICATION OF 10-QSB REPORT
                                       OF
                         CHADMOORE WIRELESS GROUP, INC.
                       FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2004



1.       The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
         Officer of Chadmoore  Wireless Group,  Inc. This  Certification is made
         pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002.  This
         Certification  accompanies  the  10-QSB  Report of  Chadmoore  Wireless
         Group, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2004.

2.       We certify that such 10-QSB Report fully complies with the requirements
         of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and
         that the information  contained in such 10-QSB Report fairly  presents,
         in all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of
         operations of Chadmoore Wireless Group, Inc.



This Certification is executed as of November 12, 2004.



                               s/s  ROBERT W. MOORE
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Robert W. Moore, Chief Executive Officer



                               s/s  STEPHEN K. RADUSCH
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Stephen K. Radusch, Chief Financial Officer



                                        A  signed   original  of  this   written
                                        statement  required  by Section  906 has
                                        been  provided  to  Chadmoore   Wireless
                                        Group,  Inc.  and  will be  retained  by
                                        Chadmoore   Wireless  Group,   Inc.  and
                                        furnished  to  the  Securities  Exchange
                                        Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.1

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-205058) pertaining to the Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan and 2015 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan of DAVIDsTEA Inc. of our report dated April 12, 2017 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of DAVIDsTEA Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 28, 2017.

 

/s/Ernst & Young LLP

 

Montreal, Canada 

 

April 12, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1) CPA auditor, CA, public accountancy permit no. A112179

 

 

----
# FILED
February 13, 1998 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Cou rt Clerk 

### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE MIDDLE SECTION AT NASHV ILLE

JOHN WATSON LITTLE and LESLIE ) EARL LITTLE, Executors for the Es tate ) of LESLIE H. LITTLE, Deceased, ) ) Plaintiffs/Appellants, ) ) Appeal No. ) 01-A-01-9707-CV-00291 VS. ) ) Bedford Circuit ) No. 7212 MICHAEL HOGAN, JEFF P AYNE and ) MIKE WILHELM TRUCKING, ) ) Defendants/Appellees. )



### CONCURRING OPINION

I concur in the dispositio n we have made of this case. My only concern is that our opinion may be inter prete d as an endors ement of the idea that a truck driver who does not follow a designated “tr uck route” is guilty

of negligence per se. “In order toestablish negligence per se, it must be shown that the statute violated was designed to impose a duty or prohibit an act for the benefit of a person or the public

. . . . It must also be established that the injured party w as within the class of per sons that the statute was meant to protect.” Cook v. Spinnaker’s of Rive rgat e, Inc. , 878 S.W.2d 934 at 937 (T enn. 1994).

I have searched the Tennessee Code for a sta tute that says truck drivers must follow designated truck routes through or around c ities and towns. With the statute I might get from its legislative his

tory some indication of the reasons for

its passage and t he class of p ersons it was meant to benefit. I have found no such statute and the appellant does not refer to o ne in its brief. So far as th is record s hows the designation of certain str eets as truck routes is forthe sole benefit of thetruckers and not for the general public.2 The appellan t does ref er to one s tatute t hat give s the depa rtment of transportation sole jurisdiction to select streets

through which traffic s hall be routed. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 54-5-205. But that section has been construed as a limited grantof power to the

commissioner t o “route the traf fic from stat e highways through
a municipality only over and through such streets and r oads which are provided by the municip ali ty

for traffic of the character broug ht to the city limits by the highways .” Collier v. Baker

, 27 S.W.2d 1085 at 1086 (Tenn. 1930).

I would hold that there is nothing in this record to indic

ate thatthe failure to follow truck routes is negligence per se.

I am authorized t o state that Jud ge Koch joins in th is concurring opinion.

_________________________________ BEN H. CANTRELL, JUDGE
1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0128

PAUL PHILLIP BARDOS AND MARY L. 

BARDOS REVOCABLE TRUST,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

vs.

ROBERT L. SPOKLIE,

Defendant and Appellee. 

ORDER

______________________________________________________________

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for extension of time, and good 

cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including October 3, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve his response 

brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 16 2022

09/16/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0128
#### COM. v. RETZLER, W.

805 EDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/15/2017

CP-09-SA-0000381-2016 (Bucks)

Appeal Dismissed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      13,235,995              13,235,995
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               54,560,345              54,560,345
<ALLOWANCES>                                 5,615,000               5,615,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            81,542,825              81,542,825
<PP&E>                                     491,888,900             491,888,900
<DEPRECIATION>                              78,283,860              78,283,860
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             667,081,275             667,081,275
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       84,314,018              84,314,018
<BONDS>                                    101,260,476             101,260,476
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       372,669                 372,669
<OTHER-SE>                                 390,927,477             390,927,477
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               667,081,275             667,081,275
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            83,895,062             227,821,233
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               48,393,065             138,471,408
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            18,357,368              50,409,041
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               697,614               1,920,555
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             626,836               2,899,391
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             15,820,179              34,120,838
<INCOME-TAX>                                 6,799,044              16,638,051
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          9,021,135              17,482,787
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 9,021,135              17,482,787
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25                     .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24                     .52
        

</TABLE>
No. 11-9936.

#### Jones *v.*Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co. et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Threat Reduction Agency 

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  DTRA Leadership             
  -  DTRA History             
  -  Mission             
  -  Strategic Initiatives             
  -  Foreign Malign Influence             
  -  Agency Overview Brief (pdf)             
  -  Agency Financial Report 
-  Careers & Opportunities    -  Your Civilian Career             
  -  Your Military Career             
  -  Welcome Aboard             
  -  Diversity and Inclusion 
-  Business    -  DTRA Contract Award Data             
  -  Office of Small Business             
  -  Mentor Protege Program 
-  News & Media    -  Press Center 
-  Contact Us		 
-  Joint Operations Center		 

# Foreign Malign Influence Fact Sheets

Aug. 1, 2023

 Biological Threat Reduction Program Chemical Security and Elimination  

                                The Chemical Security and Elimination (CSE) Program supports the cooperative elimination of chemical weapons (CW), related materials, and infrastructure; and builds the capacity of international partners   to secure toxic industrial chemicals (TIC) and CW precursors, as well as associated components, materials, equipment, technology, and expertise.             

### Stay Connected

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY **GENERAL** OF TEXAS AUSTIN

Bon. w, Loo 0

’Dani.l Oovemor of Taxa8 AUStiIl,Texas Dear Governor O’DarAel:

Your oomaunioati opinion of this d by the jouthweste ities between it.s **940,** requests the the oonatruction Companyof facil**ange, and**  Sundown, e etetutee of Texruet laws. your letter ;i oopy of the sooiated Telephone Comne Co.adaalon~ for a oessfty pmtainlng tharey advised that in our opinion Lioi1itlee of the southwsetsm idsoy, between 

## its Levelland, Texas, Texas, under the, facts as preeented, oihtion or the statutes of Texas in

Very truly yours .kTTOXNNEY

CSNE!LLOFTZUB

**BY (Signed)** 

**Zollie C.**  **Steaklay**

Aeaistant
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 0 2
- 00 179
- CR

Calvin Conway , Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 277TH

JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 99
- 294
- K277 , HONORABLE DON HUMBLE , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

In January 2000, appellant Calvin Conway pleaded guilty to attempted indecency with a child by contact. Tex. Pen. Code Ann. ' 15.01(a) (West 1994), ' 21.11(a)(1) (West Supp. 2003). Pursuant to a plea bargain, the district court deferred adjudication and placed appellant on community supervision. He no w appeals from the judgment of conviction rendered after the court revoked supervision, adjudicated him guilty, and assessed punishment at imprisonment for seven years.

Appellant = s court

- appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why ther e are no arguable grounds to be
advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim.2

App. 1978); Currie v. State , 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State , 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); G ainous v. State , 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).

Appellant filed a pro se brief. In it, he argues that he did not violate the conditions of supervision as found by the district court. The decision to proceed with an adjudication is not appealabl e. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 42.12, ' 5(b) (West Supp. 2003). Thus, the pro se brief presents nothing
for review. We have reviewed the record and the briefs and agree that the appeal is frivolous and
without me rit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel = s motion to withdraw is granted.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Mack Kidd, Justice Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Yeakel
Affirmed Filed: January 30, 2003
Do Not Publish
#### COM. v. ESCUDERO-AVILES, C.

120 MDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/18/2017

CP-06-CR-0005772-2014 (Berks)

Affirmed
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 220

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Regarding American victims of terrorism.
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 220

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the traditional policy of the United States, reiterated by this Administration, has been to vigorously pursue and apprehend terrorists who have killed American

citizens in other countries;

Whereas numerous American citizens have been killed by Palestinian terrorists, most of them in Israel or the Israeli

administered territories, including 9 since the signing of
2

•HCON 220 EH

the Oslo Accords in 1993, namely Nachshon Wachsman

(New York), Alisa Flatow (New Jersey), Sara Duker

(New Jersey), Matthew Eisenfeld (Connecticut), Joan

Davenny (Connecticut), David Boim (New York), Yaron

Ungar (New York), Leah Stern (New Jersey), and Yael

Botwin (California);

Whereas at least 20 of the terrorists suspected in the killings

of American citizens in Israel or the Israeli administered

territories during 1993–1997 have been identified by

Israel as Mohammed Dief, Nabil Sharihi, Nafez Sabih,

Imjad Hinawi, Abd al-Maid Dudin, Adel Awadallah,

Ibrahim Ghneimat, and Mahmoud Abu Hanudeh, Abd alRahman Ghanelmat, Jamal al-Hur, Raid Abu

Hamadayah, Mohammad Abu Wardah, Hassan Salamah,

Abd Rabu Shaykh ’Id, Hamdallah Tzramah, Abd Al-Nasser Atallah Issa, Hataham Ibrahim Ismail, Jihad

Mahammad Shaker Yamur, and Mohammad Abbasm;

Whereas, according to the Israeli Government, 10 of those 20

terrorist suspects are currently believed to be free men;

Whereas the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1987 permits the prosecution, in the United States, of individuals who murder

American citizens abroad; and

Whereas the United States has previously acted to bring to

justice those responsible for the deaths of American citizens and has established a precedence of United States

intervention by demanding that Libyan leader Moammar

Qadaffi transfer to the United States the Libyan terrorists suspected of bombing Pan Am flight 103: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—
3

•HCON 220 EH

1 (1) the United States should demand the pros2 ecution of all suspected perpetrators of these attacks

3 against United States citizens;

4 (2) the United States should seek the coopera5 tion of the Palestinian Authority and all other ap6 propriate authorities in the prosecution of these

7 cases; and

8 (3) the suspects should be tried in the United

9 States unless it is determined that such action is

10 contrary to effective prosecution.

Passed the House of Representatives May 5, 1998.

Attest:

Clerk.
No. 11-1494.

#### East Coast Foods, Inc., et al. *v.*Range Road Music, Inc., et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# DTRA Director Attends ChemTech Center Inauguration

/ Published May 18, 2023
THE HAUGE, Netherlands, www.dtra.mil
No. 11-1374.

#### Acord, aka Livingston, et al. *v.*Young Again Products, Inc.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.