alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                   CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the "Periodic Report"), I, Dan F. Smith,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Lyondell Chemical Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m or
     78o(d)); and

(2)  the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     Lyondell Chemical Company.

Date: November 13, 2002                    /s/ Dan F. Smith
                                           --------------------------
                                           Dan F. Smith
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 11-83.

#### Arctic Slope Native Assn., Ltd. *v.*Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of *Salazar*v. *Ramah Navajo Chapter, ante,*p. 182.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Candelario GONZALEZ-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-50401

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 13, 2018 *

Filed February 16, 2018

Janet Cabral, Benjamin Holley, Helen H. Hong, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, Office of the US Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Roxana Sandoval, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Candelario Gonzalez-Garcia appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 72-month sentence imposed upon remand following his guilty-plea conviction for importation of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

*669Gonzalez-Garcia argues for the first time on appeal that the government breached the terms of the parties’ plea agreement by failing to honor its promise to advocate for a minor role adjustment at sentencing. The government argues that Gonzalez-Garcia waived this claim. We decline to decide whether Gonzalez-Garcia waived his breach claim because, even if merely forfeited, Gonzalez-Garcia cannot show plain error.1*See United States v. Whitney,*673 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2012). Any breach by the government did not affect Gonzalez-Garcia’s substantial rights. *See United States v. Gonzalez-Aguilar,*718 F.3d 1185, 1187 (9th Cir. 2013). The record reflects that the district court understood the arguments in favor of a minor role adjustment, but did not find them convincing and would not have granted the reduction even if the government had argued for it more strenuously. Furthermore, the record reflects that, even if the court had been convinced to grant a minor role adjustment, it would not have imposed a lower sentence. Under these circumstances, there is no reasonable probability that the alleged breach affected the court’s sentencing determination. *See id.*at 1188-89.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. Though we need not decide whether the government breached the plea agreement, we do not approve of its lukewarm support for its joint recommendation for a minor role adjustment as contemplated by the plea agreement,
Exhibit 4.2

 

	
Number
    	
Incorporated   Under the Laws of the State of Alaska
    	
Shares
    
	
B-
    	
 
    	
-0-
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Cusip No.
    


 

GCI LIBERTY, INC.

 

Class B-1 Common Stock, no par value

 

Specimen Certificate

 

This Certifies that [          ]  is the owner of [          ] FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF CLASS B-1 COMMON STOCK, NO PAR VALUE, OF GCI LIBERTY, INC. (hereinafter called the “Corporation”) transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of the Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.

 

Witness, the seal of the Corporation and the signatures of its duly authorized officers.

 

Dated:

 

GCI Liberty, Inc.

 

[Corporate Seal]

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
President
    	
 
    	
Secretary
    


 

The Corporation is authorized to issue shares of more than one class of common stock and also more than one series of a class of preferred stock.  The Corporation will furnish to a shareholder upon request and without charge, a full or summary statement of the designations, preferences, limitations, and relative rights of the shares of each class authorized to be issued and the variations in the relative rights and preferences between the shares of each series so far as they have been fixed and determined and the authority of the board of directors of the Corporation to fix and determine the relative rights and preferences of subsequent series.
Exhibit 4.3


 


English Language Summary


 


Authorization Agreement for Personal Mobile Service - Termo de Autorização do Serviço Móvel Pessoal No05/2010/PVCP/SPV-ANATEL


 



	
Parties:

	
Telefônica Brasil S.A., as authorizee, and Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações (ANATEL), as grantor.


	 	 
	
Date:

	
January 18, 2010.


	 	 
	
Term:

	
Indefinite


	 	 
	
Purpose:

	
Authorization to provide Personal Mobile Service in accordance with regulations set forth by ANATEL.  This Authorization Agreement consolidates the following prior authorization agreements:  No. 012/2002/PVCP/SPV-ANATEL dated 12/10/2002; No. 017/2002/PVCP/SPV-ANATEL, dated 12/10/2002; No. 006/2003/PVCP/SPV-ANATEL, dated 2/3/2003; No. 007/2003/ PVCP/SPV-ANATEL, dated 2/3/2003; No. 08/2003/PVCP/SPVANATEL, dated 2/3/2003; No. 009/2003/PVCP/SPV-ANATEL, dated 2/3/2003; No. 010/2003/PVCP/SPV-ANATEL, dated 2/3/2003; No. 011/2003/PVCP/SPV-ANATEL, dated 2/3/2003; and No. 019/2007/PVCP/SPV-ANATEL, dated 12/7/2007.


	 	 
	
Area:

	
Region II of the General Plan of Personal Mobile Service Authorization, which includes the states of Paraná, Santa Catarina, Rio Grande do Sul, Goiás, Tocantins, Mato Grosso do Sul, Mato Grosso, Rondônia, Acre and Federal District.


	 	 
	
Amount:

	
The amount owed under the grant is R$9,000.00, which was paid at the time of execution of the Authorization Agreement.


	 	 
	
Penalty:

	
Breach of the Authorization Agreement and applicable regulations to Multimedia Communication Services may result in administrative proceedings by ANATEL, the application of warning sanctions, fines, temporary suspension or revocation of licenses.
<PAGE>

[CENTERPOINT ENERGY LETTERHEAD]

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                                               Page 1 of 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

           CenterPoint Energy subsidiary prices general mortgage bonds
                        totaling more than $762 million

     Houston - March 14, 2003 - CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (NYSE:CNP) announced
that on March 13, 2003 its electric transmission and distribution subsidiary,
CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC (CenterPoint Energy Houston) priced
general mortgage bonds totaling $762.275 million in a placement with
institutions under Rule 144A. Of that total, $450 million, at a coupon rate of
5.70 percent, will be due March 15, 2013. The remaining $312.275 million, with a
coupon rate of 6.95 percent, will be due March 15, 2033. These transactions are
expected to close on March 18, 2003.

     Net proceeds of the offering will be used for the following purposes:

          .    Deposit $150 million with the trustee to repay CenterPoint
               Energy, Inc.'s medium term notes that mature in April 2003. This
               payment satisfies CenterPoint Energy Houston's corresponding
               intercompany debt to CenterPoint Energy, Inc. and releases first
               mortgage bonds that are being held as security for the medium
               term notes.

          .    Call $62.275 million principal amount of 8.75 percent first
               mortgage bonds of CenterPoint Energy Houston, due March 1, 2022,
               plus pay a $2.2 million redemption premium.

          .    Call $250 million principal amount of 7.75 percent first mortgage
               bonds of CenterPoint Energy Houston, due March 15, 2023, plus pay
               a $9.4 million redemption premium.

          .    Repay $278.6 million of a $537 million intercompany note from
               CenterPoint Energy Houston to the parent company that matures in
               January 2028. CenterPoint Energy, Inc. will use the proceeds to
               repay a portion of its $3.85 billion credit facility and for
               general corporate purposes.

     The securities have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933
and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an
applicable exemption from registration under that Act.

     This news release does not constitute an offer to sell, or the solicitation
of an offer to buy, any security and shall not constitute an offer, solicitation
or sale in any jurisdiction in which such offering would be unlawful.

     This news release includes forward-looking statements. Actual events and
results may differ materially from those projected. Factors that could affect
actual results include the timing and impact of future regulatory and
legislative decisions, effects of competition, weather variations, changes in
CenterPoint Energy's business plans, financial market conditions and other
factors discussed in CenterPoint Energy's filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Threat Reduction Agency 

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  DTRA Leadership             
  -  DTRA History             
  -  Mission             
  -  Strategic Initiatives             
  -  Foreign Malign Influence             
  -  Agency Overview Brief (pdf)             
  -  Agency Financial Report 
-  Careers & Opportunities    -  Your Civilian Career             
  -  Your Military Career             
  -  Welcome Aboard             
  -  Diversity and Inclusion 
-  Business    -  DTRA Contract Award Data             
  -  Office of Small Business             
  -  Mentor Protege Program 
-  News & Media    -  Press Center 
-  Contact Us		 
-  Joint Operations Center		 

# Foreign Malign Influence Fact Sheets

# Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) Ukraine Factsheet

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

## Related Links

Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) Ukraine Factsheet

Cooperative Threat Reduction Ukraine Factsheet
No. 11-1455.

#### Husain *v.*Mahmood.

Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

The Board of Directors 

Republic Bancshares of Texas, Inc.: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-70456 and 333-70458 on Form S-8 of Republic Bancshares of Texas, Inc. ofour report dated February 21, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Republic Bancshares of Texas, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes inshareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-KSB of Republic Bancshares of Texas, Inc. 

 

KPMG LLP 

 

Houston, Texas 

March 21, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8354 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8354

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 9, 2020

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To establish the Servicemembers and Veterans Initiative within the 
   Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Servicemembers and Veterans 
Initiative Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. SERVICEMEMBERS AND VETERANS INITIATIVE.

    (a) Establishment.--There is established the Servicemembers and 
Veterans Initiative within the Civil Rights Division of the Department 
of Justice.
    (b) Duties.--The Servicemembers and Veterans Initiative shall--
            (1) serve as legal and policy advisor to the Attorney 
        General on the Department of Justice's efforts to enforce 
        criminal and civil laws that impact servicemembers, veterans, 
        and their families;
            (2) develop policy recommendations for the Attorney General 
        on how the Department of Justice may improve enforcement of 
        Federal law to support servicemembers, veterans, and their 
        families;
            (3) serve as the liaison and point of contact between the 
        Department of Justice and the military departments;
            (4) provide counsel to the Assistant Attorney General for 
        the Office of Justice Programs to ensure funding decisions take 
        into account servicemembers, veterans, and their families;
            (5) consult with components of the Department of Justice to 
        promote the provision of civil legal aid to servicemembers, 
        veterans, and their families;
            (6) serve as a liaison and point of contact with the 
        Consumer Protection Branch of the Civil Division of the 
        Department of Justice, with respect to the prosecution of 
        Federal crimes involving fraud that target servicemembers; and
            (7) serve as a liaison and point of contact with other 
        components of the Department of Justice as needed to support 
        the enforcement of other Federal laws that protect 
        servicemembers and veterans, as the Attorney General determines 
        appropriate.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 8, 2020.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
No. 11-1303.

#### Groves et al. *v.*City of Darlington, South Carolina.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-18-00161-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 348th District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 348-291241-17

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Gabriel and Kerr, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

INTERNATIONAL GOVERNOR SERVICES LLC, Appellant

V.

SCOTT DOUGLAS RASMUSSEN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF PEYTON NICOLE RASMUSSEN,

DECEASED, AND THE ESTATE OF PARKER STONE RASMUSSEN,

DECEASED; AND DELAVAE ANN CARLSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS

PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MICHAEL GLENN 

MASTALEZ, DECEASED, Appellees
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered the parties’ “Agreed Motion to Dismiss.” We grant the 

motion, set aside the trial court’s order denying Appellant’s special appearance 

without regard to the merits, and remand this case to the trial court for rendition of 

judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).

Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: January 17, 2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,930
<SECURITIES>                                     8,557
<RECEIVABLES>                                      220
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,707
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,707
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,718
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     16,594
<COMMON>                                        56,289
<OTHER-SE>                                    (72,894)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,707
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   813
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   662
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,078
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 420
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,347)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,347)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  4,326
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (21)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
| (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: February 11, 2011 |                    |   |
|-------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |                    |
|                    | /S/ Peter Lee           |   |
|                    | Peter Lee               |
|                    | Director, Secretary and |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer |
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 285 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 285

 Expressing the sense of the Congress that the President of the United 
   States should reconsider his decision to be formally received in 
 Tiananmen Square by the Government of the People's Republic of China.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 3, 1998

  Mr. Armey submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
          referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Congress that the President of the United 
   States should reconsider his decision to be formally received in 
 Tiananmen Square by the Government of the People's Republic of China.

Whereas 9 years ago on June 4, 1989, thousands of Chinese students peacefully 
        gathered in Tiananmen Square to demonstrate their support for freedom 
        and democracy;
Whereas it was with horror that the world witnessed the response of the 
        Government of the People's Republic of China as tanks and military units 
        marched into Tiananmen Square;
Whereas Chinese soldiers of the People's Republic of China were ordered to fire 
        machine guns and tanks on young, unarmed civilians;
Whereas ``children were killed holding hands with their mothers'', according to 
        a reliable eyewitness account;
Whereas according to the same eyewitness account, ``students were crushed by 
        armored personnel carriers'';
Whereas more than 2,000 Chinese pro-democracy demonstrators died that day, 
        according to the Chinese Red Cross;
Whereas hundreds continue to languish in prisons because of their belief in 
        freedom and democracy;
Whereas 9 years after the massacre on June 4, 1989, the Government of the 
        People's Republic of China has yet to acknowledge the Tiananmen Square 
        massacre; and
Whereas, being formally received in Tiananmen Square, the President would bestow 
        legitimacy on the Chinese Government's horrendous actions of 9 years 
        ago: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that the President should 
reconsider his decision to be formally received in Tiananmen Square 
until the Government of the People's Republic of China acknowledges the 
Tiananmen Square massacre, pledges that such atrocities will never 
happen again, and releases those Chinese students still imprisoned for 
supporting freedom and democracy that day.
                                 <all>
```