19482 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 64 / Monday, April 4, 2022 / Notices 

of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020) 

(Temporary Rule). 

11See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

12See generally 19 CFR 351.303. 

13See 19 CFR 351.303(f). 

14See Temporary Rule. 

15See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

16See 19 CFR 351.310. 

17Commerce received a timely request to verify 

from Domtar Corporation, North Pacific Paper 

Company, and Finch Paper LLC (collectively, the 

petitioners). See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Uncoated 

Paper from Portugal: Petitioners’ Request for 

Verification,’’ dated August 12, 2021. 

1See Strontium Chromate from Austria: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 2019–2020, 86 FR 67435 

(November 26, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2019– 

2020 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: 

Strontium Chromate from Austria,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

3See Strontium Chromate from Austria and 

France: Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 FR 65349 

(November 27, 2019) (Order). 

briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 

proceeding are encouraged to submit 

with each argument: (1) A statement of 

the issue; (2) a brief summary of the 

argument; and (3) a table of 

authorities.11 Case and rebuttal briefs 

should be filed using ACCESS 12 and 

must be served on interested parties.13

Executive summaries should be limited 

to five pages total, including footnotes. 

Note that Commerce has temporarily 

modified certain of its requirements for 

serving documents containing business 

proprietary information, until further 

notice.14

Interested parties who wish to request 

a hearing must do so within 30 days of 

publication of these preliminary results 

by submitting a written request to the 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance using Enforcement and 

Compliance’s ACCESS system.15

Requests should contain the party’s 

name, address, and telephone number, 

the number of participants, whether any 

participant is a foreign national, and a 

list of the issues to be discussed. Issues 

raised in the hearing will be limited to 

those raised in the respective case and 

rebuttal briefs.16 If a request for a 

hearing is made, Commerce intends to 

hold the hearing at a time and date to 

be determined. Parties should confirm 

the date and time of the hearing two 

days before the scheduled date. Parties 

are reminded that all briefs and hearing 

requests must be filed electronically 

using ACCESS and received 

successfully in their entirety by 5:00 

p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. 

Verification 

As provided in section 782(i)(3) of the 

Act, Commerce intends to verify the 

information relied upon in the final 

results.17 Normally, Commerce verifies 

information using standard procedures, 

including an on-site examination of 

original accounting, financial, and sales 

documentation. However, due to current 

travel restrictions in response to the 

global COVID–19 pandemic, Commerce 

is unable to conduct on-site verification 

in this administrative review. 

Accordingly, we intend to verify the 

information relied upon for the final 

results through alternative means in lieu 

of an on-site verification. 

Final Results of Review 

Unless otherwise extended, 

Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

including the results of its analysis of 

the issues raised in any written briefs, 

not later than 120 days after the date of 

publication of this notice, pursuant to 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213(h)(1). 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this POR. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of doubled 

antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This administrative review and notice 

are issued and published in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213 and 

351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: March 28, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Discussion of the Methodology 

V. Product Comparisons 

VI. Date of Sale 

VII. Constructed Export Price 

VIII. Normal Value 

IX. Currency Conversion 

X. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–07000 Filed 4–1–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–433–813] 

Strontium Chromate From Austria: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that Habich 

GmbH (Habich) did not make sales of 

subject merchandise in the United 

States at prices below normal value 

during the period of review (POR) June 

18, 2019, through October 31, 2020. 

DATES: Applicable April 4, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jaron Moore or Brian Smith, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–3640 or (202) 482–1766, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On November 26, 2021, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results of the 

2019–2020 administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on strontium 

chromate from Austria.1 The 

administrative review covers Habich, 

the only company for which a review 

was requested. For the events that 

occurred since the Preliminary Results, 

see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.2 Commerce conducted 

this review in accordance with section 

751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 3

The merchandise covered by this 

Order is strontium chromate from 

Austria. A full description of the scope 

of the Order is contained in the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

We addressed all issues raised in the 

case and rebuttal briefs filed in this 

administrative review in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. A list of the 

issues addressed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is in the 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 64 / Monday, April 4, 2022 / Notices 19483 

4See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012). 

5See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 

6See Order. 

7For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 8See Order. 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade/gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

We made no changes to the 

Preliminary Results. 

Final Results of the Administrative 

Review 

We determine that the following 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

Habich exists for the period June 18, 

2019, through October 31, 2020: 

Exporter/producer 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Habich GmbH ............................. 0.00 

Disclosure 

Normally, Commerce will disclose to 

the parties in a proceeding the 

calculations performed in connection 

with the final results of review in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

However, because Commerce made no 

adjustments to the margin calculation 

methodology used in the Preliminary 

Results, there are no additional 

calculations to disclose for the final 

results of this review. 

Assessment Rates 

Commerce has determined, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries in accordance with 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.212(b).4 Commerce intends to 

issue assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

where the respondent reported the 

entered value of its U.S. sales, we 

calculated importer-specific ad valorem 

duty assessment rates based on the ratio 

of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for the examined sales to the 

total entered value of the sales for which 

entered value was reported. Where the 

respondent did not report entered value, 

we calculated importer-specific per-unit 

duty assessment rates based on the ratio 

of the total amount of antidumping 

duties calculated for the examined sales 

to the total quantity of those sales. 

Where either the respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de 

minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific 

assessment rate is de minimis (i.e., less 

than 0.5 percent), we will instruct CBP 

to liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

To determine whether an importerspecific per-unit duty assessment rate is 

de minimis, we calculated an estimated 

entered value. 

The final results of this review shall 

be the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by the final results 

of this review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable.5

Consistent with Commerce’s 

clarification of its assessment practice, 

for entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by Habich for 

which it did not know that the 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate those entries at the all-others 

rate in the original less-than-fair-value 

(LTFV) investigation 6 if there is no rate 

for the intermediate company(ies) 

involved in the transaction.7

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of strontium chromate from 

Austria entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the date of publication of the final 

results as provided by section 751(a)(2) 

of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for 

Habich will be equal to the weightedaverage dumping margin established in 

the final results of this review; (2) for 

merchandise exported by producers or 

exporters not covered in this review but 

covered in a prior completed segment of 

the proceeding, the cash deposit rate 

will continue to be the companyspecific rate published in the completed 

segment for the most recent period; (3) 

if the exporter is not a firm covered in 

this review, a prior review, or the 

original LTFV investigation, but the 

producer is, then the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established in the 

completed segment for the most recent 

period for the producer of the 

merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate 

for all other producers or exporters will 

continue to be 25.90 percent, the allothers rate established in the LTFV 

investigation in this proceeding.8 These 

cash deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

violation subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results of administrative review in 

accordance with sections 751(a) and 

777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: March 25, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Whether to Base Normal Value 

on Habich’s Third Country Sales to 

Mexico 

Comment 2: The Product Matching 

Characteristics 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
19484 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 64 / Monday, April 4, 2022 / Notices 

1See Countervailing Duty Order; Certain Heavy 

Iron Construction Casting from Brazil, 51 FR 17786 

(May 15, 1986) (Order). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 86 

FR 68220 (December 1, 2021) (Initiation Notice). 

3See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Five Year (‘‘Sunset’’) 

Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Heavy 

Iron Construction Castings from Brazil—Domestic 

Interested Parties’ Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ 

dated December 16, 2021. 

4 Id. at 3. 

5See GBR’s Letter, ‘‘Iron Construction Castings. 

Sunset Review. Initial Comments,’’ dated December 

30, 2021. 

6See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Five Year (‘Sunset’) 

Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Heavy 

Iron Construction Castings from Brazil—Domestic 

Interested Parties’ Substantive Response,’’ dated 

December 31, 2021. 

7See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Five Year (‘Sunset’) 

Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Heavy 

Iron Construction Castings from Brazil—Domestic 

Interested Parties’ Comments in Rebuttal to the 

Government of Brazil’s Substantive Response,’’ 

dated January 10, 2022. 

8See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews 

Initiated on December 1, 2021,’’ dated January 20, 

2022. 

9The scope language contained in prior sunset 

proceedings for the Order has varied. For clarity, 

Commerce intends to use the scope listed above in 

all future proceedings involving the Order. 

10See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited 

Fifth Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty 

Order on Heavy Iron Construction Castings from 

Brazil,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

V. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–07003 Filed 4–1–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–351–504] 

Heavy Iron Construction Castings 

From Brazil: Final Results of the 

Expedited Fifth Sunset Review of the 

Countervailing Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of this expedited 

sunset review, the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) finds that 

revocation of the countervailing duty 

order (CVD) on heavy iron construction 

castings (iron castings) from Brazil 

would be likely to lead to continuation 

or recurrence of countervailable 

subsidies at the levels as indicated in 

the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’ 

section of this notice. 

DATES: Applicable April 4, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jolanta Lawska, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–8362. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On May 15, 1986, Commerce 

published in Federal Register the CVD 

order on iron castings from Brazil.1 On 

December 1, 2021, Commerce published 

the notice of initiation of the expedited 

fifth sunset review of the Order, 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 On 

December 16, 2021, Commerce received 

a notice of intent to participate from 

D&L Foundry, Inc., EJ USA, Inc., 

Neenah Foundry Company, and U.S. 

Foundry & Manufacturing Corporation 

(collectively, ‘‘domestic interested 

parties’’), within the deadline specified 

in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3 Each of 

these companies claimed interested 

party status under section 771(9)(C) of 

the Act, as a domestic producer of the 

domestic like product.4 On December 

30, 2021, Commerce received a 

substantive response and notice of 

intent to participate from the 

Government of Brazil (GBR) within the 

deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(3)(i).5

On December 31, 2021, Commerce 

also received a substantive response to 

the Notice of Initiation from the 

domestic interested parties within the 

deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(3)(i).6 Commerce did not 

receive any substantive response from a 

producer or exporter of subject 

merchandise in Brazil. On January 10, 

2022, the domestic interested parties 

filed rebuttal comments in response to 

the GBR’s substantive response.7 On 

January 20, 2022, Commerce notified 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission that it did not receive a 

substantive response from respondent 

interested parties.8 As a result, 

Commerce has conducted an expedited 

(120-day) sunset review of the Order, 

pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). 

Scope of the Order 9

The products covered by the Order 

are certain heavy iron construction 

castings from Brazil, limited to manhole 

covers, rings, and frames, catch basin 

grates and frames, cleanout covers and 

frames used for drainage or access 

purposes for public utility, water and 

sanitary systems, classifiable as heavy 

castings under Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule (HTS) item numbers 

7325.10.0010, 7325.10.0020, and 

7325.10.0025. Subject merchandise may 

also enter under 7325.99.1000. The HTS 

item numbers are provided for 

convenience and Customs purposes 

only. The written description remains 

dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

A complete discussion of all issues 

raised in this sunset review, including 

the likelihood of continuation or 

recurrence of subsidization in the event 

of revocation of the Order and the 

countervailable subsidy rates likely to 

prevail if the Order were to be revoked, 

is provided in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.10 A list of the topics 

discussed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is attached as an 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Final Results of Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 

752(b) of the Act, we determine that 

revocation of the Order would be likely 

to lead to continuation or recurrence of 

a countervailable subsidy at the rate 

listed below: 

Exporter/producer Subsidy rate 

(percent) 

Country-Wide Rate ... 1.06 Ad Valorem. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of return/destruction of APO materials 

or conversion to judicial protective 

order is hereby requested. Failure to 

comply with the regulations and the 

terms of an APO is a sanctionable 

violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

Commerce is issuing and publishing 

these final results and this notice in 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES