alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed October 16, 2018

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 00865

- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF F .M.E.A.F., A.A.F.H., AND A.J.F.H., CHILD REN

On Appeal from the 315th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013

- 04982J



### ORDER
This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the termination of the parent

- child relationship is at issu e (“parental termination case”). The notice of appeal was filed on October 5 , 2018 . Appellant, D.M.F., has established indigence or is presumed to be indigent. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(a). The reporter’s record was due October 15 , 2018 ( 10 days after the n otice of appeal was
filed )

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1(b); 28.4(a)(1). The record has not been filed. Appeals in parental termination cases and child protection cases are to be brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed.
See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a). The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible2

for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c).
The trial court must direct the court reporter to immediately commence the

pr eparation of the reporter’s record and must arrange for a substitute reporter, if

necessary. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.4(b)(1). Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely in this accelerated appeal, we order the official court reporter for the 3 15th District Court to file the reporter’s record in this appeal by October 26 , 2018. If the record is not timely filed, we will order the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to
file the record.

PER CURIAM
# No, the US has not built a biological weapons lab at Kemri

/ Published May 17, 2022

Disarming disinformation isn't just happening in the country of Ukraine.  Propaganda spreads to other countries where DTRA continues to do good work for our partners.

Read More...
EX10-3WestbergAgreement




EXHIBIT 10.3
RENEWAL ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This Renewal Addendum No. 1 is made this 13th day of March, 2014, to the Employment Agreement between Michael Westberg (the “Employee”) and Home Federal Bank, a federally chartered savings bank (the “Bank”), dated March 27, 2013 (the “Employment Agreement”).  The Board of Directors of the Bank and of HF Financial Corp., the parent company of the Bank, have authorized the Chairman of the Bank’s Board of Directors to execute this Renewal Addendum No. 1 on behalf of the Bank.  


WHEREAS, the term of Employment Agreement expires on June 30, 2014, unless renewed by mutual agreement of Employee and the Bank; and


WHEREAS, the Employment Agreement may be renewed for not less than one year by providing notice thereof no later than ninety (90) days prior to the end of the then existing term; and


WHEREAS, Employee and the Bank do mutually agree to renew the term of the Employment Agreement.


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of paragraph 1 of the Employment Agreement, the parties agree as follows:  


1.    The term of the Employment Agreement is hereby renewed and the Employment Agreement shall continue in effect through June 30, 2015.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Employee and the Bank have executed this Renewal Addendum No. 1 effective as of the day and year first above written.




EMPLOYEE    HOME FEDERAL BANK 
    
/s/ Michael Westberg        /s/ Michael M. Vekich     
Michael Westberg        By: Michael M. Vekich 
        Its: Chairman of the Board
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements of Form S-3 (Nos. 333-30344 and 333-51430) and on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-
73904, 333-55978, 333-53446, 333-32096, 333-32092 and 333-65923) of Hanover
Compressor Company of our report dated September 7, 2001 relating to the
combined financial statements of the Gas Compression Business of Schlumberger
Limited, which appears in the Current Report on Form 8-K of Hanover Compressor
Company dated August 31, 2001.




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas
April 15, 2002
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 346

To correct the enrollment of the bill H.R. 3150.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 9, 1998

Mr. GEKAS submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To correct the enrollment of the bill H.R. 3150.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill (H. R.

3 3150), to amend title 11 of the United States Code, and

4 for other purposes, the Clerk of the House of Representa5 tives shall make the following correction: In section 1014

6 of the bill, strike ‘‘Act’’ each place it appears and insert

7 ‘‘title’’.

Æ
No. 11-1519.

#### Kawache, an Infant, by Her Parent and Natural Guardian Kawache *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS***

 

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report of Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Richard A. Miller, President and Chief Executive Officer *(Principal Executive Officer)* of the Company, and Leiv Lea, Chief Financial Officer *(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)* of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.                                      The Report, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

 

2.                                      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.

 

Dated: August 17, 2018

 
| /s/ RICHARD A. MILLER                     |   | /s/ LEIV LEA                                     |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
| Richard A. Miller, M.D.                   |   | Leiv Lea                                         |
| *President and Chief Executive   Officer* |   | *Chief Financial Officer*                        |
| *(Principal Executive Officer)*           |   | *(Principal Financial and   Accounting Officer)* |

 

----

*                                         This certification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K, to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Broadcaster, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Martin Wade, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|                                         
|                                         
|/s/ Martin Wade III                      
|Martin Wade, III,
Chief Executive Officer



Date:  November 14, 2008



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ERIC REY HERNANDEZ,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 18

- 00076

- CR

Appeal from

120th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 20170D05013 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be

dismissed, in accordance with the opinion of this Court. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We

further order that this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 31ST DAY OF JU LY , 2018

.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClu re, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
Table C

- 2. Variance

- Covariance Matrix for Components of the AAPI (based on sampled and modeled data as described in Chapter 5)

AAPI

Component Q BC0 Neco L(NHx) T NO y T SOx NOy SOx

Q 0.059

- 546.265 1.916003

- 0.19045

- 0.02419

- 0.01315 0.061018 0.174289

BC0

- 546.265 20602129

- 28633.4 89.241 259.19 3 139.1 80

- 1018.82

- 1868.01

Neco 1.916

- 28633.4 951.49 4 141.030

- 0.032 4

- 0.43 5 25.364 29.75 1

L(NHx)

- 0.190 89.241 141.030 157.96 8 0.82 2 0.115 10.994 10.75 5

T NO y - 0.024 259.19 3

- 0.032 0.82 2 0.0 60 0.01 7 0.345 0.12 4

T SOx

- 0.013 139.1 80

- 0.43 5 0.115 0.01 7 0.009 0.059 0.01 2

NOy 0.061

- 1018.82 25.364 10.994 0.34 5 0.059 4.67 2 3.57 9

SOx 0.174

- 1868.01 29.75 1 10.75 5 0.12 4 0.01 2 3.57 9 4.718
EX-10.4



 Exhibit 10.4 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“First Amendment”) is made the
11th day of December, 2017 by and between Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Donna S. Negrotto, an individual (“Executive”), with respect
to the following facts and circumstances: 
 RECITALS 

The Company and Executive entered into an Employment Agreement on May 23, 2016 (the “Employment Agreement”). 

The Company and Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement pursuant to the terms set forth herein. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and agreements set forth herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 

AMENDMENT 
 1. Effective
as of January 1, 2018, Article 3, Section 3.1 of the Employment Agreement (Base Salary) is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following new Article 3, Section 3.1: 

“3.1 Base Salary. In consideration for Executive’s services hereunder, the Company shall pay Executive an annual base salary
at the rate of Four Hundred Ninety Thousand Dollars ($490,000) per year effective as of January 1, 2018 through the end of the Term; payable in accordance with the Company’s regular payroll schedule from time to time (less any deductions
required for Social Security, state, federal and local withholding taxes, and any other authorized or mandated similar withholdings).” 

2. Except as modified herein, all other terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. In the event of a conflict
between the terms of the Employment Agreement and this First Amendment, the terms of this First Amendment shall apply. No modification may be made to the Employment Agreement or this First Amendment except in writing and signed by both the Company
and Executive. 
 [SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this First Amendment to be duly executed as of
the date first written above. 
  

							
	EXECUTIVE	 		 	PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
				
	 /s/ Donna S. Negrotto
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Anthony M. Sanfilippo

	Donna S. Negrotto	 		 		 	Anthony M. Sanfilippo, Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                         516,085
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,777,597
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    370,065
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,740,350
<PP&E>                                         3,262,552
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 11,274,196
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,916,475
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       910
<OTHER-SE>                                     26,052,509
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   11,274,196
<SALES>                                        8,254,724
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8,254,724
<CGS>                                          5,566,786
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  7,699,699
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (39,781)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             29,131
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                594,806
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            594,806
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   594,806
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sepasitiano FEAO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-10502

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted December 6, 2017 San Francisco, California

Filed January 10, 2018

Before: REINHARDT * and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges, and ELLIS,** District Judge.

*

 This case was submitted to a panel that included Judge Kozinsld, who recently retired. Following Judge Kozinslci's retirement, Judge Reinhardt was drawn by lot to replace him. Ninth Circuit General Order 3.2,h. Judge Reinhardt has read the briefs, reviewed the record, and listened to oral argument.

**

 The Honorable Sara Lee Ellis, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Defendant-Appellant Sepasitiano- Feao (“Feao”) appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider his sentence. Our appellate jurisdiction rests on 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we AFFIRM.

Feao’s plea agreement contained a broad waiver of appeal rights, and even if this appeal were not waived, the district court lacked jurisdiction to modify his sentence. A district court may correct a sentence resulting from “arithmetical, technical, or other clear error,” but only “[wjithin 14 days after sentencing.” Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a). Rule 35 defines “sen-*917teneing” as “the oral announcement of the sentence.” Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(c), A sentence is final when there’s a “formal break in the proceedings from which to logically and reasonably conclude that sentencing had finished.” *United States v. Ochoa,*809 F.3d 453, 458-59 (9th Cir. 2015) (citation omitted). Rule 35(a)’s 14-day window is jurisdictional. *See United States v. Aguilar-Reyes,*653 F.3d 1053, 1056 (9th Cir. 2011).

Because “a recommendation to the Bureau of Prisons is not part of a sentence,” Feao’s sentence was final after his first sentencing hearing on July 22, 2016. *United States v. Ceballos,*671 F.3d 852, 855 (9th Cir. 2011). The district court therefore correctly concluded it lacked jurisdiction to entertain Feao’s November 3, 2016 motion to modify his sentence.

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Texas d&Mtr fit CbmMnc Apped? ' Ca-plfiy( SkcftoK) pj, Bom &I02 AksT/a) £\ 7g 7/'-23o$ 

## fo PSnt u< snTi^aAToPAp^k Ate:05-^mii>,iWtoai



## fitH nccwc is hymn* /?>. Z $kJ A penmrf£>il 7)/s- (U&ricuiybf fctuiao ouiik cewtr /// Myusf acts' Aa/o $£&&/£& .•tfotfhw'iDAl on idfa/is: that th-is toutz UePuSEb my f&nTio+l

&6Kviefl&t a Cofy^Pr^ pt^(ls suQ>mi(ret> foil fWs dot^fs pSvie^ And Aaji/ tmeiL ^rmcMm^tJa •Atsos ferrrtoAM. W/Jkgmrn 8£ #^va> s£pimr5E(tfA mor/o^ to suppt£*&r7H£ 

### PPA MCM GoPtt O-PALL Pdo Sc fhfflOA/S Tttftr Mb ®E€aI 

### Kleo wot m 3^ Court <>P Appeals ,?&%$£ se^* tmh&fH (J- TUfiTtootfbA WPfC I^Ai A/of doiLBD ohl 8V T#« &>^f-ht- $mt E£4&/0 Atop H^ iue fttfhW&h •?&> & tflmtbA^ tb 1W Mddigss tisfzb p%h>u>

-

RECEIVED IN v

_ rt r 

### COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS j%gV|A<LD Pmfc- ft> Se NOV 17 2015 -w^T&lGCm'JI fllcGmdi Kfc'f 3oc>iSovdk Gndy h-jive. AbelAcosta,Clerk Be*/fe Tx TBlciX
(logo) Rialto

CAPITAL

 

 

**2018 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item1123)**

 

 

Poolingand Servicing Agreement (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement") datedas of December 1, 2014 by and among Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc. asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, RialtoCapital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Wilmington Trust, NationalAssociation, as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, CertificateAdministrator, Certificate Register, Authenticating Agent and Custodian and ParkBridge Lender Services LLC as Trust Advisor relating to Morgan Stanley Bank ofAmerica Merrill Lynch Trust 2014-C19, Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2014-C19 **(MSBAM 2014-C19)**

 

The undersigned, a dulyauthorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the"Special Servicer")hereincertifies to the following:

 

1.       All servicing activities and performanceof such servicing activities under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement are performed on behalf of the SpecialServicer.

 

2.       A review of the servicing activities andperformance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2018to December 31, 2018 (the"Reporting Period")in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement hasbeen conducted under my supervision.

 

3.       To the best of my knowledge, based on suchreview, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligationsunder the terms of the Pooling andServicing Agreement,in all material respects for the Reporting Periodand if there has been a failure to fulfill any suchobligations in any material respect, each failure and thenature and status thereof has been specificallyidentified herein.

 

 

Certified by: /s/ Adam Singer

Adam Singer, ManagingDirector 

 

Date: March 1, 2019
Ex10.1_resignationJB




Exhibit 10.1 


 


March 14, 2014


 


Mr. Gregory Roberts
President and CEO 
Spectrum Group International, Inc.
1063 McGaw
Irvine, California  92614


Dear Greg: 


Please accept this letter as my resignation from the board of directors of Spectrum Group International, Inc. (the “Company”), effective upon the spinoff from the Company of its subsidiary A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. (“A-Mark”) and my appointment as director of A-Mark. 


My resignation is not a result of a disagreement with the Company.




Sincerely, 


/s/ Jeffrey D. Benjamin
No. 11-1392.

#### Louisiana et al. *v.*Leonard.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-60017

Conference Calendar

 

JAMES LEE TOLBERT, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:94CV289-D-D

- - - - - - - - - -

April 19, 1996

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant James Tolbert, Jr., did not file a notice of

appeal after the district court denied his motion for

reconsideration, which was timely as a Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)

motion. Therefore, this court cannot consider the motion or the

attached documents in adjudicating this appeal. Fed. R. App. P.

4(a)(4). Based on the record then before it, the district court

did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Tolbert’s civil rights

action without prejudice, for failing to exhaust his 
administrative remedies and for failing to comply with an order

to provide a status report within 150 days. See Pedraza v. Ryan,

18 F.3d 288 (5th Cir. 1990). 

AFFIRMED.
[4910-I3-P]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NClJllJtENfES lrrll<GSn"lJOc Federal Aviation Administration NITlAI.S'lG 14CFR Part 39 

## ~D\D- e> 

## Ia..q {Docket No. :FA..i\..-~-*****; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-245-AD) RIN 2120-AA64 ROlITINGSY"FlOL ISiC

N1TlALSIS1(;



# , 

# , , , , , , 

# , , , , , The loss ofmultiple display units, ifnot corrected expediently during a high workJoad period, potentially affects the capability ofthe flight crew and could contribute to a loss ofsituational awareness and consequent control ofthe aeroplane, which would constitute an unsate condition. 

# , Several occurrences ofloss oftbe AC (alternating current) BUS 1have been reported which led in some instances to the loss ofthe AC ESS (essential) BUS and DC (direct current) ESS BUS and cOlmected systems. The affected systems include multiple flight deck Display Units (Primary Flight Display, Navigation Display and Upper Electronic Centraliscd Aircraft Monitoring display). condition as: listed above. This proposed ADresults from mandatory continuing airworthiness ' ~

# M__ I. LTJAL\'5 G information (MeAl) originated byan aviation authority ofanother country to identify C. ~ and COlTeet an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes theunsafe A~/(J

# ~I I0 "OUHN<'; SYMf>:)L AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. SUMMARY: We propose to adopt anew airworthiness directive (AD) for the product ACTION: Notice ofproposed rulernaking (NPRM). Antwortbiness Directives; Airbus A318, A319, A320, A321 Series Airplanes

INITIAlSIS1G [lAT~