alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED  CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
OCTOBER 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Apr-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 Aug-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Oct-31-2000
<CASH>                                         200,875
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,450,934
<ALLOWANCES>                                   315,042
<INVENTORY>                                    108,360
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,177,904
<PP&E>                                         5,609,917
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,078,047
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,943,501
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,161,520
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          1,300,093
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,846
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,423,977)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,943,501
<SALES>                                        3,500,952
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,500,952
<CGS>                                          2,751,873
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,460,325
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (83,220)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             87,145
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (42,593)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (42,593)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (42,593)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .00



</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  Exhibit 11 (C)



                                    EXHIBIT
                       Computation of Earnings Per Share
                          Year Ended December 31, 1993
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
                                                             Assuming
                                             Primary      Full Dilution
                                          --------------  --------------
<S>                                        <C>             <C>
Weighted average common shares               
 outstanding                                 11,438,451      11,438,451 
Other dilutive securities                            --          66,430
                                           ------------    ------------
 
Total shares outstanding for calculation     11,438,451      11,504,881
                                           ============    ============
 
Net loss - as reported                     $(20,198,000)   $(20,198,000)
Deduct:  Dividends on Cumulative
  Convertible Preferred Stock                   (63,000)        (62,000)
                                           ------------    ------------
 
Net loss for calculation                   $(20,261,000)   $(20,260,000)
                                           ============    ============
 
Net loss per share                         $      (1.77)   $      (1.76)
                                           ============    ============
</TABLE>
#### Tarik I. MESSAAD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF WASHOE; Chuck Allen, Washoe County Sheriff, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-16111

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*295Submitted January 16, 2018 *

Filed January 19, 2018

Tarik I. Messaad, Pro Se

Michael William Large, Esquire, Attorney, Stephan Hollandsworth, Esquire, Attorney, Washoe County District Attorney’s Office, Reno, NY, for Defendants-Appel-lees

Before: REINHARDT, TROTT, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Tarik I. Messaad appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging an unlawful detention. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Thompson v. Paul,*547 F.3d 1055, 1058 (9th Cir. 2008) (dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)); *Watison v. Carter,*668 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir. 2012) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)). We may affirm on any ground supported by the record. *Thompson,*547 F.3d at 1058-59. We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Messaad’s Fourth Amendment claim alleging that he was unconstitutionally held without a prompt probable cause determination because a probable cause determination was made within 48 hours of his arrest. *See Jones v. City of Santa Monica,*382 F.3d 1052, 1055 & n.2 (9th Cir. 2004) (probable cause determinations made within 48 hours are presumptively prompt, and determinations may be informal and non-adversarial without a personal appearance by the suspect).

Although the district court improperly dismissed on the basis of *Heck v. Humphrey,*512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994), dismissal of Messaad’s Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment claims was proper because Messaad has not alleged any harm arising from the defendants’ actions, and leave to amend would be futile. *See Thinket Ink Info. Res., Inc. v. Sun Microsystems, Inc.,*368 F.3d 1053, 1061 (9th Cir. 2004) (dismissal without leave to amend is appropriate where “amendment would be futile” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

Contrary to Messaad’s contention, the district court properly screened Messaad’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). *See Lopez v. Smith,*203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc) (§ 1915(e) applies to all in forma pauperis complaints).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION, INCOME AND CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                  228,875
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                               0<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 229,206
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        213,025
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0<F1>
<PREFERRED>                                          0<F1>
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,372
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   229,206
<SALES>                                              0<F1>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,422
<CGS>                                                0<F1>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    29
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,321
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     72
<INCOME-TAX>                                        25
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0<F1>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0<F1>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0<F1>
<CHANGES>                                            0<F1>
<NET-INCOME>                                        47
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Not applicable
</FN>


</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-03-00446-CR The State of Texas, Appellant

v. Angie Godinez, Appellee
FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 7 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. 627-413, HONORABLE ELISABETH A. EARLE, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N The State’s motion to dismiss this appeal is granted. S ee Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). The appeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________ David Puryear, Justice Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: August 29, 2003 Do Not Publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PLAINS
RESOURCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31,
1995, AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           6,129
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,632
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,120
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,632
<PP&E>                                         418,084
<DEPRECIATION>                                 137,546
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 352,046
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           68,381
<BONDS>                                        206,636
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,618
<OTHER-SE>                                      75,411
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   352,046
<SALES>                                        403,906
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               404,225
<CGS>                                          363,716
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  401,573
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,215
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,606
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,652
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,652
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,652
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

                                        CERTIFICATION

    Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, the  undersigned certifies that (1) this
Quarterly  Report of BF  Enterprises,  Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for
the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities  and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (this  "Report"),  fully  complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended,  and (2) the  information  contained in this Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial  condition of the Company as
of June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001 and its results of operations for the
three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2002.



                                        /s/ Brian P. Burns
                                        ----------------------------
                                        Brian P. Burns
                                        Chairman of the Board, President and
                                        Chief Executive Officer
Date: August 13, 2002
Exhibit 11.1

                            Coffee Holding Co., Inc.
                    Computation of Per Share Earnings (Loss)
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  Six Months Ended               Three Months Ended
                                                      April 30,                       April, 30
                                                 2006            2005            2006            2005
                                             -----------     -----------     -----------      -----------
<S>                                          <C>             <C>             <C>              <C>
Net Income (Loss)                            $   235,404     $ 1,000,636     $  (284,234)     $   598,356
                                             ===========     ===========     ===========      ===========

BASIC EARNINGS:
Weighted average number of common
   Shares outstanding                          5,529,830       3,999,650       5,529,830        3,999,650
                                             ===========     ===========     ===========      ===========

Basic earnings (loss) per common share       $       .04     $       .25     $      (.05)     $       .15
                                             ===========     ===========     ===========      ===========

DILUTED EARNINGS:
Weighted average number of common
   Shares outstanding                          5,529,830       3,999,650       5,529,830        3,999,650
Warrants - common stock equivalents               65,030               0               0                0
                                             -----------     -----------     -----------      -----------

Weighted average number of common
   Shares outstanding - as adjusted            5,594,860       3,999,650       5,529,830        3,999,650
                                             ===========     ===========     ===========      ===========

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share     $       .04     $       .25     $      (.05)     $       .15
                                             ===========     ===========     ===========      ===========
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             877
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3698
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       3407
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  8445
<PP&E>                                            4123
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   13333
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             8228
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                        4149
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     13333
<SALES>                                          14325
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 14325
<CGS>                                            10258
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    12251
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 106
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1951
<INCOME-TAX>                                       228
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1723
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1723
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         998,839
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,321
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,030,243
<PP&E>                                      16,503,831
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,072,623
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,461,451
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          448,985
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,012,466
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                      1,787,448
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,935,949
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,487,699
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                448,250
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            448,250
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   448,250
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    10.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    10.73
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Deshone HOLMES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-3552

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: February 23, 2018

Filed: February 28, 2018

*596Martin Joseph McLaughlin, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Patrick J. Reinert, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Iowa, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Michael Deshone Holmes, Pro Se

Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, Michael Holmes challenges the order of the district court1 revoking his supervised release and imposing a 6-month sentence, followed by 6 months of supervised release. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and has submitted a brief arguing that the district court abused its discretion by revoking Holmes’s supervised release, and that the sentence is substantively unreasonable.

Upon careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by revoking Holmes s supervised release. *See United States v. Miller,*557 F.3d 910, 914 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review). We further conclude that Holmes’s sentence was not unreasonable, as the district court properly considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3653(a) factors; there was no indication the court overlooked a relevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing the relevant factors, *see United States v. Johnson,*827 F.3d 740, 744 (8th Cir. 2016) (standard of review); and the sentence was within the Guidelines range, *see United States v. Perkins,*526 F.3d 1107, 1110 (8th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw, and affirm.

1

. The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.
Docket No: FAA-2015-6538 Dir ID: 2015-NM-031-AD
UNMANNED AERIAL SoLUTIONS, INc. 

Blue-Chip Unmanned Aerial Solutions, Inc. 

Attn: Clint P. Stevens 

1965 South Beech St. 

Wichita, KS 67207 

316-305-5498 

April 22, 20 15 

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

Docket Operations 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Request to amend and allow for Blue-Chip UAS, Inc. the ability to utilize 

additional sUAS platforms under the same direction as provided within exemption 

#11172, docket# FAA-2014-0787-0009, approved February 10,2015. 

Dear Sir/Madam, 

Dear Sir or Madam; 

Blue-Chip Unmanned Aerial Solutions, Inc. (Blue-Chip UAS) was issued an exemption under 

Section 333 of the "FAA Modernization and Reform act of2012" (the "Reform Act") numbered 11172 

(the Exemption) for the purpose of conducting UAS operations within the oil and gas, agriculture, 

wildlife and aerial photography industries. Blue-Chip UAS, herby requests an amendment to the 

Exemption to allow an additional type of"Delta Wing" unmanned aircraft system (UAS) to be operated 

in full compliance with the conditions set forth within the Exemption. 

Blue-Chip UAS, requests permission to operate the following UAS based on their type, size, 

weight, and speed under the same terms and conditions contained within the Exemption and provided by 

the parameters set forth in regards to capabilities and limitations identified within the Flight Operations 

Manual and Maintenance Manual attached as provided. 
Model 

Skywalker X8 

~ 

Delta Wing 7ft Span 

Weight 

<10lbs 

Speed 

<60mph 

Blue-Chip UAS, respectfully requests the same finding from the FAA as provided to 

Aerial Mob, LLC as to their an1ended exemption numbered 11066A, docket ID FAA-2014-0353, dated 

February 2, 2015. As indicated, the FAA found the amendment request was not precedent setting, that 

good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register and that any delay 

in acting on the petition would be detrimental to the organization. 

Thank you for your time in regards to this petition and please direct any correspondence to Mr. 

Clint Stevens. 

Clint P. Stevens 

Executive Director & Co-Founder 

Blue-Chip UAS, Inc. 

316-305-5498 

cc: 

Robert Pappas 

Kiera Jones 

John Barbagallo