alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Paul C. Honda, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports
on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Honda Auto Receivables 2014-4
Owner Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange
Act periodic reports;



4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by
the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required
in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and



5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have
reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Citibank, N.A.



Date: June 10, 2016



|/s/ Paul C. Honda                                    | 
|---------------------------------------------------- | 
|Paul C. Honda                                       
|Vice President and Assistant Secretary              
|American Honda Finance Corporation                  
|(senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 57 (Thursday, March 24, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 16769]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06126]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice: (22-022)]


Heliophysics Advisory Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 
announces a meeting of the Heliophysics Advisory Committee (HPAC). This 
Committee functions in an advisory capacity to the Director, 
Heliophysics Division, in the NASA Science Mission Directorate. The 
meeting will be held for the purpose of soliciting, from the science 
community and other persons, scientific and technical information 
relevant to program planning.

DATES: Thursday, May 5, 2022, 2:30 p.m.-6:00 p.m.; and Friday, May 6, 
2022, 11:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m., Eastern Time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. KarShelia Kinard, Science Mission 
Directorate, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358-2355, 
or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#345f5546475c51585d551a5f5d5a554650745a5547551a535b42"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="86ede7f4f5eee3eaefe7a8edefe8e7f4e2c6e8e7f5e7a8e1e9f0">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Dr. Janet Kozyra, Designated Federal Officer, Science Mission 
Directorate, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546, at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8be1eae5eeffa5e0e4f1f2f9eacbe5eaf8eaa5ece4fd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5c363d32392872373326252e3d1c323d2f3d723b332a">[email protected]</span></a>, 202-875-3278.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting will be virtual and will take 
place telephonically and via WebEx. Any interested person must use a 
touch-tone phone to participate in this meeting. Any interested person 
may call the USA toll free number 1-877-939-1570, or toll number 1-210-
234-0110, passcode 9775739, followed by the # sign to participate in 
this meeting by telephone on both days. The WebEx link is https://nasaenterprise.webex.com/nasaenterprise/j.php?MTID=md29775a628286c1b87f1c28cc34d3b87; the meeting number is 
2763 347 9700 and the password is HPACMay2022! (case sensitive) on both 
days.
    The agenda for the meeting includes the following topic:

<bullet> Heliophysics Division Update
<bullet> Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Accessibility Efforts
<bullet> Research and Analysis Program Trends

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants.

Patricia Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2022-06126 Filed 3-23-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOHN DINO MARTIN, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior District Judge. (CR-86-84-K, CA-96-73-5) Submitted: October 29, 1996 Decided: December 13, 1996 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Dino Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Patrick Michael Flatley, Assistant United States Atto rney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104- 132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. Martin v. United States , Nos. CR-86-84-K; CA-96-73-5 (N.D. W. Va. May 29, 1996). Appellant's motions for a certificate of probable cause and for appointment of counsel are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juan BRISENO-NERIO, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40652 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 20, 2018

*475Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Juan Briseno-Nerio, Pro Se

Before REAVLEY, CLEMENT, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Briseno-Nerio has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Brise-no-Nerio has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 25 Received in Senate (RDS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 25

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 1997

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That (a) the statue of Jack Swigert, furnished by the State of Colorado 
for placement in National Statuary Hall in accordance with section 1814 
of the Revised Statutes of the United States (40 U.S.C. 187), is
 accepted in the name of the United States, and the thanks of the 
Congress are tendered to the State of Colorado for providing this 
commemoration of one of its most eminent personages.
    (b) The State of Colorado is authorized to use the rotunda of the 
Capitol on May 22, 1997, at 11 o'clock, ante meridiem, for a 
presentation ceremony for the statue. The Architect of the Capitol and 
the Capitol Police Board shall take such action as may be necessary 
with respect to physical preparations and security for the ceremony.
    (c) The statue shall be displayed in the rotunda of the Capitol for 
a period of not more than six months, after which period the statue 
shall be moved to its permanent location in National Statuary Hall.
    Sec. 2. The Clerk of the House of Representatives shall transmit a 
copy of this concurrent resolution to the Governor of Colorado.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 7, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 1 | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2014-3 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 2 | Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 3 | Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 4 | Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 5 | All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. |

|                                                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                               |  |
| /s/ Ryan C. Farris                                            |   |
|                                                          |
| Ryan C. Farris                                                |
| President, Ally Auto Assets LLC, as Depositor                 |
| (Senior Officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
<PAGE>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                  UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
                       February 6, 2003 (February 6, 2003)



                            GLOBALSANTAFE CORPORATION
               (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

         Cayman Islands                   1-14634                98-0108989
(State or other jurisdiction of         (Commission          (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)         file number)        Identification No.)


        15375 Memorial Drive, Houston, Texas            77079-4101
      (Address of principal executive offices)          (Zip Code)


       Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (281) 925-6000

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<PAGE>

Item 7.  Financial Statements and Exhibits

(c) Exhibits

          99.1    GlobalSantaFe Fleet Status as of February 6, 2003.

Item 9.  Regulation FD Disclosure

During the first half of each calendar month, GlobalSantaFe Corporation
publishes a list containing information about the status of each rig in its oil
and gas drilling rig fleet. The list includes each rig's rated water depth (in
the case of offshore rigs) or drilling depth (in the case of land rigs), design,
location, and contract status, including information regarding the dayrate being
earned by the rig. This month's list is as of February 6, 2003. The list is
included as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated
herein by reference.

The information furnished pursuant to this Item 9, including Exhibit 99.1, shall
not be deemed to be "filed" for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section.

                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                            GLOBALSANTAFE CORPORATION

Date: February 6, 2003                      By:   /s/ Alexander A. Krezel
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Alexander A. Krezel
                                               Vice President, Secretary and
                                               Associate General Counsel

<PAGE>

                                Index to Exhibits

Exhibit
Number        Description
-------       -----------
  99.1        GlobalSantaFe Fleet Status as of February 6, 2003.
UNITED STATES

v.

Aaron T. HOWARD

Special Warfare Operator First Class

(E-6)

U.S. Navy

Applicant

NMCCA No. 202000251

Panel 1

ORDER

Denying Application for Review

Applicant was tried by general court-martial at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia, Military 

Judge Michael J. Luken presiding.1 On 7 February 2020, the court-martial members sentenced Applicant to reduction to E-5, forfeiture of $500.00 per month for three months, and 

confinement for 30 days. The convening authority approved the sentence and ordered it executed.2

On 15 July 2020, a judge advocate reviewed the case, in accordance with Article 65, Uniform Code of Military Justice [UCMJ],3 and determined that the court-martial had jurisdiction over Applicant and each offense of which he was found guilty, that each specification of 

which he was found guilty stated an offense, and that the sentence was legal. The judge 

advocate also responded to each allegation of error raised by the Accused, finding no error.

On 17 September 2020, Applicant applied for review by the Judge Advocate General, in 

accordance with Article 69(a), UCMJ. On 20 October 2021, the Judge Advocate General denied the Application for Relief.

On 20 December 2021, Applicant timely submitted to this Court an Application for Review of the Judge Advocate General’s Action, in accordance with Article 69(d)(1)(B), UCMJ.

 

1 Judge Hayes C. Larsen completed the Entry of Judgment.

2 The convening authority suspended the $500.00 forfeiture for three months, provided SO1 Howard maintain an allotment for his wife in the amount of $500.00 for three months.

3 10 U.S.C. § 865.
United States v. Howard, NMCCA No. 202000251

Order Denying Application for Review

2

We have reviewed the Action taken by the Judge Advocate General in this case and the 

Application for Review, and have determined that the Application does not demonstrate a 

substantial basis for concluding that the Action under review constituted prejudicial error.4

Accordingly, it is by the Court on this 29th day of March, 2022, 

ORDERED:

The Application for Review is DENIED.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR.

Clerk of Court

Copy to: 

Timothy C. Parlatore, Esq., Counsel for Applicant

Elizabeth Candelario, Esq., Counsel for Applicant

 

4 Article 69(d)(2)(A), UCMJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 75 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 75

  To designate October, 1996, as ``Roosevelt History Month'', and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             February 1 (legislative day, January 30), 1995

  Mr. Moynihan (for himself, Mr. D'Amato, Mr. Levin, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. 
Bradley, Mr. Byrd, Mr. Chafee, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Daschle, Mr. DeWine, Mr. 
 Dodd, Mr. Domenici, Mr. Glenn, Mr. Gorton, Mr. Heflin, Mr. Hollings, 
    Mr. Inouye, Mr. Johnston, Mr. Kerrey, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Kohl, Mr. 
Lautenberg, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Pell, Mr. Pressler, Mr. Robb, 
Mr. Sarbanes, Mr. Simon, Mr. Simpson, Mr. Thurmond, Mr. Wellstone, Mr. 
Akaka, Mr. Biden, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Breaux, Mr. Bumpers, Mr. Campbell, 
 Mr. Coverdell, Mr. Dorgan, Mr. Feingold, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Graham, 
Mr. Hatch, Mr. Jeffords, Mr. Kennedy, Ms. Mikulski, Ms. Moseley-Braun, 
  Mrs. Murray, Mr. Pryor, Mr. Reid, Mr. Rockefeller, and Mr. Specter) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                            on the Judiciary

                           December 13, 1995

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  To designate October, 1996, as ``Roosevelt History Month'', and for 
                            other purposes.

Whereas January 30, 1995, is the 113th anniversary of the birth of President 
        Franklin Delano Roosevelt in Hyde Park, New York;
Whereas almost a half-century after the death of President Roosevelt, his legacy 
        remains central to the public life of the Nation;
Whereas before becoming President of the United States, Franklin Delano 
        Roosevelt served in the New York State Senate and later was appointed 
        Assistant Secretary of the Navy, and in 1928 became Governor of New 
        York;
Whereas as President of the United States between 1933 and 1945, Franklin Delano 
        Roosevelt guided the Nation through two of the greatest crises of the 
        twentieth century, the Great Depression and the Second World War, and in 
        so doing, changed the course of American politics;
Whereas a memorial in stone in the District of Columbia will soon be dedicated 
        to his memory, as authorized by Congress in 1955; and
Whereas a month commemorating the history of Franklin Delano Roosevelt would 
        complement the dedication of the memorial: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That October, 1996, should be designated ``Roosevelt 
History Month''. The President is requested to issue a proclamation 
calling on the people of the United States to observe the month with 
appropriate ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
February 6, 2013 

MEMORANDUM 

From: William H. Maxwell 

EPA/SPPD/ESG (D243-01) 

To: Docket Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234 

Subject: Meeting with American Public Power Association (APPA) and TriState Generation 

Attendees: 

Janet McCabe, EPA 

Teresa Pugh, American Public Power Association 

Barbara Walz, TriState Generation and Transmission Association 

Discussion: 

A general discussion was held regarding clarifying questions on the proposed Mercury and Air Toxics 

Standards (MATS) reconsideration issues.
# C_2021072EN.01002001.xml

| 1.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 January 2021 — ABLV Bank v SRB

(Case T-758/18) (1)

(Economic and monetary Union - Banking union - Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Setting of the 2015 and 2018 ex ante contributions - Rejection of the request for a recalculation and a reimbursement of contributions - Action for annulment - Challengeable act - Admissibility - Institution whose licence has been withdrawn - Article 70(4) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 - Concept of ‘change of status’ - Article 12(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63)

(2021/C 72/29)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ABLV Bank AS (Riga, Latvia) (represented by: O. Behrends, lawyer)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB) (represented by: J. Kerlin and P. Messina, acting as Agents, and by B. Meyring, S. Schelo, T. Klupsch and S. Ianc, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou, A. Nijenhuis and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the letter from the SRB of 17 October 2018 by which the SRB rejected the applicant’s application for, first, the recalculation of its 2018 ex ante contribution and the repayment of the overpayment and, second, the repayment of a portion of its 2015 ex ante contribution, following the withdrawal of its licence by the European Central Bank (ECB).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders ABLV Bank AS to pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by the Single Resolution Board (SRB); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders ABLV Bank AS to pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by the Single Resolution Board (SRB);

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 4.3.2019.

---