alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 63 (Friday, April 1, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 19081]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06934]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED


Procurement List; Proposed deletions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Proposed deletions from the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing to delete service(s) from the 
Procurement List that were furnished by nonprofit agencies employing 
persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before: May 1, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, 1401 S Clark Street, Suite 715, Arlington, Virginia 22202-
4149.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information or to submit 
comments contact: Michael R. Jurkowski, Telephone: (703) 785-6404, or 
email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fcbfb1a8b9ba9998ae999bbcbd9e9590958885b39299d29b938a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="480b051c0d0e2d2c1a2d2f08092a2124213c3107262d662f273e">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 
U.S.C. 8503(a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide 
interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed 
actions.

Deletions

    The following service(s) are proposed for deletion from the 
Procurement List:

Service(s)

Service Type: Janitorial/Custodial
Mandatory for: Bureau of Land Management, Salt Lake City Field 
Office and Warehouse, 2370 S Decker Lake Blvd., Salt Lake City, UT
Designated Source of Supply: Community Foundation for the Disabled, 
Inc., Salt Lake City, UT
Contracting Activity: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, BUREAU OF LAND 
MANAGMENT

Michael R. Jurkowski,
Acting Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2022-06934 Filed 3-31-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 11-1354.

#### Dee *v.*Maine.

Sup. Jud. Ct. Me. Certiorari denied.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marvin Suntate MOBLEY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-7054

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 29, 2018

Decided: February 8, 2018

Marvin Suntate Mobley, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United • States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Ashe-ville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Marvin Suntate Mobley seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion, The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Mobley has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny Mobley’s motion to proceed under the Criminal Justice Act and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,133,960
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,089,617
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,112,713
<INVENTORY>                                  1,100,189
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,431,583
<PP&E>                                       2,864,648
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,363,277
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,567,485
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,563,420
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,275,480
<OTHER-SE>                                     513,859
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,567,485
<SALES>                                     30,392,629
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            30,392,629
<CGS>                                        8,670,974
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,670,974
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,056,534
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               973,332
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              56,068
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,833,594
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,095,937
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,737,657
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,737,657
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of CHDT Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Stewart Wallach, Chief Executive Officer of the Company of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:





(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Stewart Wallach


Stewart Wallach


CEO, Director


(Principal Executive Officer)








August 14, 2009








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             107
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      185
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           7,327
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,081
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,550
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                          5,942
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,281
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,002)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,550
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,489
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,641
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 297
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (764)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    897
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       133
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
Exposure Report

PMN Number: P-14-0518 

11/6/2014 4:04:48 PM

Assessor: Flessner/BC

Ratings

Non-Occupational: Environmental:

Drop Criteria: EAB Drop

Criteria Reasoning: No water and other releases below 

threshold

Exposure Based Assessment:

Exposure-Based (Non-Occupational): 

Exposure-Based (Environmental): 

Exposure Parameter Exposure-Based Persistent/Bioaccum Exposure Value

Surface DW:

 Fish Ingestion:

Ground DW:

Inhalation:

Water Releases:

Total Releases:

Consumer Exposure:

Recommended Fate Tests:

Consumer Use expected? N

Consumer Use remarks: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 3
Scenario Comment Sites Location

1. Scenario -- Medium: (Engineering) ; Use: Site-Limited Chemical Int 1 Morrisville, PA

 2. Release -- Medium: Incineration (Engineering) ; Use: Site-Limited Chemical Int 1 

3. Scenario -- Medium: (Engineering) ; Manufacturing 1 Morrisville, PA

 4. Release -- Medium: Air (Engineering) ; Manufacturing 1 

 5. Release -- Medium: Incineration (Engineering) ; Manufacturing 1 

6. Scenario -- Medium: (Exposure) ; Manufacturing; Use 1 Morrisville, PA

 7. Release -- Medium: Air (Exposure) ; Manufacturing; Use 1 

 8. Release -- Medium: Incineration (Exposure) ; Manufacturing; Use 1 

 9. Release -- Medium: Incineration (Exposure) ; Manufacturing; Use 1 

**Environmental Release Information for Those Releases Which Went to the Model (Release Identifier 

Number)

1

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 3
EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 3
**EXHIBITITEM 31.1**

SECTION 302CERTIFICATION

I, Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr. certify that:

1.         Ihave read this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Northern California Bancorp,Inc.;

2.         Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

3.         Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.         Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and have:

a)              designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)             evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as ofthe end of the period (the “Evaluation Date”); and

c)              presentedin this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the EvaluationDate;

5.         Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee or registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)              allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls whichcould adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)             anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6.         Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterlyreport whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in otherfactors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to thedate of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions withregard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
| Date: August 10, 2006 |   | /s/ Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr. |
|-----------------------|--------|---------------------------------|
|                  |   | Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr.     |
|                  |   | Chairman of the Board &     |
|                  |   | Chief Executive Officer         |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC
Form 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          96,437
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,604,459
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,057
<INVENTORY>                                  1,543,833
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,355,565
<PP&E>                                       1,895,474
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,225,934
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,033,178
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,074,316
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       507,048
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,264,669
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,033,178
<SALES>                                      2,381,527
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,381,927
<CGS>                                        1,414,734
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,414,734
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               651,330
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,870
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                305,993
<INCOME-TAX>                                   125,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            180,193
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   180,193
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00022-CR

Deborah K. Blair

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From County Criminal Court No. 3

of Tarrant County (1289242)

May 8, 2014

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 131 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J. Res.131

                       One Hundred Fifth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  eight

                            Joint Resolution

 
  Waiving certain enrollment requirements for the remainder of the One 
  Hundred Fifth Congress with respect to any bill or joint resolution 
    making general or continuing appropriations for fiscal year 1999.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the provisions of 
sections 106 and 107 of title 1, United States Code, are waived for the 
remainder of the One Hundred Fifth Congress with respect to the 
printing (on parchment or otherwise) of the enrollment of any bill or 
joint resolution making general appropriations or continuing 
appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1999. The 
enrollment of any such bill or joint resolution shall be in such form 
as the Committee on House Oversight of the House of Representatives 
certifies to be a true enrollment.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### COM. v. MITWALLI, W.

2470 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/06/2017

CP-46-CR-0006888-2013 (Montgomery)

Affirmed
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Aaron BEASLEY, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-10945 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 27, 2017

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Peter Michael Fleury, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, Lara Wynn, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Aaron Beasley pleaded guilty to two counts of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2), and he received a sentence of 57 months in prison, to be followed by a two-year term of supervised release. On appeal, Beasley asserts that the district court erred in the sentencing calculations because his prior Texas convictions for aggravated robbery did not constitute the enumerated offense of “robbery” under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2. As he concedes, however, his claim is foreclosed by circuit precedent. *See United States v. Santiesteban-Hernandez,*469 F.3d 376, 380-81 (5th Cir. 2006), *overruled on other grounds by United States v. Rodriguez,*711 F.3d 541, 547-63 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc).

In addition, Beasley argues that § 922(g)(1) exceeded Congress’s authority under the Commerce Clause because it is not necessary to prove that his possession of the firearm was in or affected interstate commerce. In support of his assertion, he relies on *Nat'l Fed’n of Indep. Bus. v. Sebelius,*567 U.S. 519, 132 S.Ct. 2566, 183 L.Ed.2d 450 (2012). However, he acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed. *See United States v. Alcantar,*733 F.3d 143, 143-46 (5th Cir. 2013).

In his final ground for relief, Beasley cites to *Flores-Figueroa v. United States,*556 U.S. 646, 129 S.Ct. 1886, 173 L.Ed.2d 853 (2009), to support his proposition that his convictions may not stand because the indictment did not allege and Beasley did not admit that he knew his possession of the firearms was in or affected interstate commerce. A conviction under § 922(g)(1) requires proof that the defendant knew he possessed the firearm but does not require knowledge of the interstate nexus. *United States v. Dancy,*861 F.2d 77, 81-82 (5th Cir. 1988). In *United States v. Rose,*587 F.3d 695, 705 (5th Cir. 2009), this court held that *Dancy*remained good law even after the Supreme Court’s decision in *Flores-Figueroa,*which addressed the mens rea element of a different statute. Accordingly, as Beasley concedes, his argument is foreclosed.

*301In light of the foregoing, Beasley’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Justin Asaad COOKE, Petitioner

No. 613 MAL 2017

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

January 8, 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.