## ........ .. 

### -­ :.:. -."=- 

### -s- :-. !\. 

# -**~.** ."**~.­** '"

....--: 

### .. ­ .• _. J' ._**~.** - "1--" _:..!...

__0.:- 

### &1-'-:'



### DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
Miehael O.**Luvia~** 0-'; 150 Nonh 1950 West Reply 10: Sl.\te of Utah Division of Air Qualily Dianne R. Nielson. Ph.D. Salt Lake City. Ulah 84114 (801) 536-4000 P.O. Box 144820**~ov­** Russell A. Roberts (80 I) 536-4099 Fax Salt Lake City. Utah**8~** 114-4820 

### ou- (801) 536-4414T.D.D. 

### August 27, 1993 DAQE-D752-93

James R. Van Orman Director of Environmental Management DOO-ALClEM 7276 Wardlegih Road Hill Air Force Base, Utah 84056-5127 Re: Modified Approval Order for: A. Replacement Boilers in Buildings 1624, 1904,2104.2203 B. Paim Spray Booth in Building 751 C. Carbon Brake Coating Process in Building 507 Davis County CDS 

### Al NA

Dear Mr. Van Orman: The Division of Air Quality received a letter dated June 1, 1993, requesting that condition 4E of the Approval Order (AO) DAQE-492-92 be modified. Condition 4E required that the boiler stack be tested at 90%, 70%, and 50% of the boilers capacity. This condition was changed to required tesling at 90% of the boilers capacity. The new condition is now numbered 6E. Also. the generators J

### isted in DAQE492-92 are now consolidated in a separate AO (DAQE 719-93). Therefore. they have been deleted from this AO. This air quality AO authorizes the project with the following conditions. Failure to 

### comply with any of the conditions may constitute a violation of this order. 1. Hill Air Force Base shall install and operate the following: A. The boilers located in Buildings 1624, 1904,2104. and 2203 B. The paint spray booth located in Building 751 C. The carbon brake coating process located in Building 507 These shall all be operated according to the information submitted in the Notice of Intent dated April 24, 1991, and additional information submitted to 

### the Executive Secretary Jated July 30,1991; December 26. 1991; January 8, 1992, and June 1, 1993. A copy of this AO shall be posted on site and shall be available to the employees who

.operate the air emission producing equipment. All employees who operate the air emission producing equipment shall receive instruction as to 

### their responsibilities in operating the equipment in compliance with all of the relevant conditions. 

### 4.2.4-489 ?ri"ted 0" recycled paper

### DAQE-0752-93 Page 2



### 2. Definitions ofterms, abbreviations, and references used in this AO conform to 

### those used in the Utah Air Conservation Rules (UACR), Utah Administrative Codes (UAC), and Series 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR). These definitions take precedence unless specifically defined otherwise herein. 3. This AO shall replace the AO dated May 22, 1992 (DAQE-492-92). 4. The approved installations shall consist of the following equipment: A. Replacement boilers located in Buildings 1624,2104, and 2203, rated at 250 HP

- The boilers shall be equipped with low-NO x 

### burners using natural gas as the primary fuel, with #2 fuel oil being used as the back-up fuel. B. Placing of an existing 400 HP boiler in Building 1904 using natural gas as the primary fuel with #2 fuel oil being used as the back-up fuel. C. A paint spray booth equipped with paint arrestor tilters located in Building 751 and using low VOC compliance paint. D. An existing electric furnace to 

### be used for baking Bendix P-Il coating on carbon brake disks in Building 507. 5. Emissions to the atmosphere from the indicated emission point shall not exceed the following rates and concentrations: A. Exhaust stacks for 250 HP replacement hoilers in Buildings 1624, 2104, and 2203: I) 

### NO x - 

### 40 ppm at 7% oxygen: 0.24 Ih/hr 2) CO

- 100 ppm at 7% oxygen B. Exhaust stack for 400 HP replacement boiler in Building 1904,

- NOx - 

### 1.84 Iblhr C. Exhaust stack for carbon brake coating in Building 507

- Phosphorous Oxides

­ 1.33 Ib/hr 6. Stack testing to show compliance with the emission limitations of condition #5 shall be performed as specified below: 

## A. Emission Point Pollutant Testing

1. 

### Boiler exhaust stacks in Bldgs 1624, 1904, 2104, and 2203 NO x 

### § *** 

### CO */** **


### 4.2.4-490

### DAQE-D752-93 Page 3


### 2. Carbon brake coating exhaust in Bldg 507 

### PO. */** ** 

### B. Testing Status (To be applied above)
* 

### No initial testing is required. However, the Executive Secretary may require testing at any time in accordance with R307-1-3.4.1, UAC. The source shall be tested if directed by the Executive Secretary.
** 

### The testing method shall be submitted to the Executive Secretary for approval before the testing is performed. The source shall be tested if directed by the Executive Secretary. § 

### The stack shall be tested for NO. emissions compliance within 30 days of startup using a portable testing instrument approved by the Executive Secretary. *** 

### The boiler stack shall he.**re~ested eve~y**  

### 30**~8:'~~ 'J"~~:'~;~;-** **~2\'S** 

### ± 10 days. The maximum time between tests shall ne .») 

### Doiler operating days. C. Test Procedure Boiler stack emissions testing shall be performed by the following procedure or an approved equivalent. Equivalency shall be determined by the Executive Secretary and approved prior to tests being conducted. D. Sample Pon A sampling POrt shall he installed in each boiler exhaust stack in accordance with 40 CFR 60. Appendix A. Method #1 or as approved by the Executive Secretary. The sample port shall be safely accessible to the tester. operatOr, or inspector in accordance with OSHA standards. E. Operating Rate Each hoiler stack shall be tested in accordance with the schedule in Condition #6.A.1. The steam production or operating rate during testing shall be set at 90% 

## ± 10% of the boilers capacity. F. 

### Test Instrument The test procedure shall he conducted using a portable testing instrument approved by the Executive Secretary. The testing instrument shall be calibrated on site with a suitable NBS referenced or traceable calibration gas in accordance with the instruction of the test instrument.



### 4.2.4-491

### DAQE-G752-93 Page 4

G. Test Procedure The test shall be conducted in the following manner: 1. 

### The gas sample shall be drawn according to the instructions of the test instrument heing used. 

### 2. The sample value shall be determined from the test instrument. appropriate calculations made. and the data recorded. H. Failed Boiler Status If the boiler is unable to anain the emission limitation in condition #5. at anyone of the operating rates specified in condition 6E, the boiler shall be assigned to a lower position on the "use priority list" (used as standhy where possible) until the unit has heen repaired or maintenance performed and a successful retest completed. Maintenance and repairs of any hailer that fails the paiodical test shall be performed within 15 days or the hoikr shall he idled. If a hailer. that has failed a test", is repaired and a successful retest completed according to the limitations of Condition #5.A within 15 days, the boiler shall be determined to not have heen in violation. A boiler that fails the retest after repair shall be idled until further repairs are made and a successful retest completed. If the hoiler demand requires the boiler to be operated. it shall he hase loaded at the rate that will result in the lowest emissions rate possihle until the hoiler can he repaired and shown in compliance by the above test. Operating a hoiler that has failed the ahove "retest after repair" shall he determined [0 

### he a violation of this AO. I. 

### Reports A copy of all test reports containing the test results. any calculations required, and the test instrument calibration data shall he retained by the owner/operator for two years. The reportS shall he made availahle to 

### the Executive Secretary or his agent upon request. An annual summary report of all the test results with a copy of the periodical reports shall be submined to 

### the Executive Secretary no later than January 31 of each year for the previous cal endar year. 7. Visible emissions from the following emission points shall not exceed the following values: 

## A. 250 hp Boiler Building 1624 10% 

## B. 400 hp Boiler Building 1904 10% 

### C. 250 hp Boiler Building 2104 10% 

### 4.2.4-492

### DAQE-0752-93 Page 5

D. 

### 250 hp Boiler Building 2203 10% 

### E. Paint spray booth Building 751 10% F. 

### Carbon brake furnace Building 507 0% Opacity observations of emissions from stationary sources shall be conducted in accordance with 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 9. Visible emissions from mobile sources and intermittent sources shall use procedures similar to Method 9, but the requirement for observations to be made at IS-second intervals over a 6-minute period shall not apply. 8. 

### The emissions of VOC from paint spray booth in Building 751 shall not exceed 0.040 tons per 12-month period without prior approval in accordance with R307-1-3.1, UAC. Compliance with the limitation shall be determined on a rolling 12-month total. Based on the tirst day of each month, a new 12-month total shall be calculated using the previous 12 months. The emissions of VOC from the spray hooth shall be determined by maintaining a record of paints and thinners used. The record shall include the following data for each item used: A. Name of paint or thinner B. Weight in pounds per gallon C. Percent VOC by weight D. Amount used on a daily basis Records of consumption shall be kept for all periods when the plant is in operation. Records ofconsumption shall be made available to the Executive Secretary upon request, and shall include a period of two years ending with the date of the request. VOC emissions shall be determined by the following manner: VOC = (% 

### Volatile hy Weight / 100) x 

### (Density lh/gal) x 

### (Gallons Consumed) / (2.000 Ih/ton) The VOC content in pounds for each individual item or surface coating used shall be calculated. and then the total of all items shall be summed. such that the cumulative total shall not exceed the 0.04 tons per 12 

### month period as specitied.

9. The owner/operator shall use only natural gas as a primary fuel and #2 fuel oil 

### as a backup fuel in the replacement boilers located in Buildings 1624, 1904.2104. and 2203. If any other fuel is to be used. an AO shall be required in accordance with R307-1-3.1, UAC. 10. 

### The sulfur content of any fuel oil burned shall not exceed 0.5% hv weight. The sulfur content ofany fuel oil or diesel fuel shall he tested if

### directed hy the Executive Secretary. 11. The paint spray booth shall be equipped with a set of paint arrestor particulate filters or equivalent to 

### control particulate emissions. All air exiting the booth shall pass through this control system before heing vented to the atmosphere. Equivalency shall be determined by the Executive Secretary. 

### 4.2.4-493

### DAQE-0752-93 Page 6

12. All installations and facilities authorized by this AO shall be adequately and properly maintained. The owner/operacor shall comply with R307-1-3.5 and 4.7, UAC. R307-1­ 3.5, UAC addresses emission inventory reporting requirements. R307-1-4.7, UAC addresses unavoidable breakdown reponing requirements. The owner/operacor shall calculate/estimate the excess emissions whenever a breakdown occurs. The sum total of excess emissions shall be reponed to the Executive Secretary for each calendar year no later than January 31 of the following year. 13. The Executive Secretary shall be notified in writing upon start-up of the installation, as an initial compliance inspection is required. Eighteen months from the date of this AO, the Executive Secretary shall be notified in writing of the status of construction/installation if constructionlinstallation is not completed. At that time, the Executive Secretary shall require documentation of the continuous construction/installation of the operation and may revoke the AO in accordance with R307-1-3.1.5. UAC. Any future moditications to the equipment approved by this order must also be approved in accordance with R307-1-3.1.1, UAC. This AO in no way releases the owner or operator from any liahility for compliance with all other applicable federal, state. and local regulations including the UACR. Annual emissions from the source listed in this NOI are currently calculated at the following values: A. Total annual emissions for each of the 250 hp boilers located in Buildings 1624, 2104, and 2203 are the following values: I) 0.06 tons/yr for Particulate 2) 0.056 tons/yr for 

### PM\o 3) 0.01 tons/yr for**SO~** 

### 4) 0.47 tons/yr for NO,

. 5) 0.13 tons/yr for VOC 6) 0.46 tons/yr for CO

B. Total annual emissions for the 400 hp boiler located in huild ing 1904 are the following values: 1) O. 

### I 1 cons/yr for Particulate 2) 0.10 cons/yr for PM,o 3) 0.02 cons/yr for SO:: 4) 3.68 tons/yr for NO. 5j 0.22 tons/yr for VOC 6) 0.73 tons/yr for CO C. 

### Total annual emissions for the paint booth located in building 751 is 

### 0.04 tons/vr for VOC. 

### 4.2.4-494

### DAQE-Q752-93 

### Page 7

D. Total annual emissions for the carbon brake coating process located in building 507 

### is 1.32 tons!vr for pax' 

### E. Total annual emissions. based on 100 hr/yr 

### operation. for each emergency generator located in buildings 1212. and 1213 are the following values: 1) 0.04 tons/yr for Particulate 2) 0.04 tons/yr for PMIQ 3) 0.04 tons/yr for SO: 4) 0.67 

### tons/yr for NO x 

### 5) 0.05 tons/yr for VOC 6) 0.14 

### tons/yr for CO 7) 0.01 tons/yr for Aldehydes These calculations are for the purposes of determining the applicability of PSD and nonanainment area major source requirements of the UACR. Except for VOc. they are not to be used for purposes of determining compliance. Sincerely,

ussell A. Roberts, Executive Secretary Utah Air Quality Board RAR:JR:sbq

cc: EPA Region 

## vm. Mike Owens

4.2.4-495

# State ofUta.h DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUTY DIVISION OF AIR QUAUTY 

# -
Michael O. Leavin GoYc..­ 150 Nonh 1950 West Reply to: State of Utah Dianne R. Nielson. Ph.D. Salt Lake City. Utah 84114 Division oi Air Quality ExOC1&ivc Dircclor (801) 536-4000 P.O. Box 144820 Russell A. Roberts (801) 536-4099 Fax Salt Lake City. Utah 84114-4820 Dircclol" (801) 538-6621 T.D.D.



### Memorandum To: Lynn Menlove. New Source Review Manager 

### From: Julie A. Rose. Engineering Technician 

# Jt, Subject: Modify Approval Order for HAFB (DAQE-492-92) 

### Date: August 16. 1993



## =============================================== On June 1, 1993, James Van Orman of HAFB wrote a letter to DAQ requesting that AO DAQE-492-92 be modified. Condition 4E of this AO reads as follows: 4. Stack testing to show compliance with the emission limitations of condition #3 shall be performed as specified below: E. Operating Rate Each boiler stack shall be tested in accordance with the schedule in Condition #4.A.1. The steam production or operating rate during testing shall be set at the following rates for testing: 1) 90% 

## ± 10% of the boiler's capacity 2) 70% 

## ± 10% 3) 50% 

## ± '10% In order to ramp the boilers to specified load levels and stabilize them for 

### 5 minutes before commencing a test, HAFB has to add the by-pass exhaust ports and exhaust from 1,000 to 9.000 lbs of steam per hour. It takes approximately 3-4 hours per boiler to complete a test at the specified loads, during which time, the steam and energy is wasted and venting steam creates a very noisy atmosphere. This also does not constitute economical operation. These boilers may run close to 90% load during the winter months; however. during the summer months. they may run at 40%-50% load or totally shut down. HAFB is requesting that the operating rates in condition 4E be deleted to allow testing at the existing load conditions and firing rates.

4.2.4-496 Pnntec on recyc1ea oaper

### I recommend that the condition 4E be changed to require testing at at least 90% of the boilers capacity. This will allow HAFB to operate at the boilers maximum capacity. The attached letter should be sent.



### 4.2.4-497

### James R. Van Orman Director of Environmental Management OOALC/EM Headquarters Ogden Air Logistics Center Hill Air Force Base. Utah 84056-5990

Re: Modified Approval Order for: A. Replacement Boilers in Buildings 1624, 1904,2104,2203 B. Paint Spray Booth in Building 751 

### C. Carbon Brake Coating Process in Building 507 Davis County CDS Al NA

Dear Mr. Van Orman:

The Division of Air Quality received 

### a letter dated June 1, 1993, requesting that condition 4E of 

### the Approval Order (AO) DAQE-492-92 be modified. Condition 4E required that the boiler stack be tested at 90%,70%, and 50% of the boilers capacity. This condition was changed to required testing at 90% of the boilers capacity. THe new condition is now numbered 6E. Also, the generators listed in DAQE-492-92 are now consolidated in a separate AO (DAQE 719-93). Therefore, they have been deleted from this AO. This air quality AO authorizes the project with the following conditions. Failure to 

### comply with any of the conditions may constitute a violation of this order: 1. Hill Air Force Base shall install and operate the following: A. The boilers located in Buildings 1624, 1904,2104, and 2203 B. The paint spray booth located in Building 751 

### C. The carbon brake coating process located in Building 507 These shall all beoperated according to the information submitted in the Notice of Intent dated April 24, 1991, and additional information submitted to the Executive Secretary dated July 30. 1991; December 26, 1991; January 

### 8, 1992. and June l. 

### 1993. A copy of this AO shall be posted on site and shall be available to the employees who operate the air emission producing equipment. All employees who operate the air emission producing equipment shall receive instruction as to their responsibilities in operating the equipment in compliance with all of the relevant conditions. 2. Definitions of terms, abbreviations, and references used in this AO conform to those used in the Utah Air Conservation Rules (UACR), Utah Administrative Codes (UAC), and Series 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR). These definitions take precedence unless specifically defined otherwise herein.
4.2.4-498

### Mr. VanOrman Page 4

3. This Approval Order shall replace the Approval Order dated May 22, 1992 (DAQE492-92). 4. The approved installations shall consist of the following equipment: A. Replacement boilers located in Buildings 1624, 2104. and 2203,rated at 250 HP

- The boilers shall be equipped with 'low-NO, burners using natural gas as the primary fuel, with #2 fuel oil being used 

### as the back-up fuel. B. Placing of an existing 400 HP boiler in Building 1904 using natural gas as the primary fuel with #2 fuel oil being used 

### as the back-up fuel 

### C. A 

### paint spray booth equipped with paint arrestor filters located in Building 751 and using low VOC compliance paint. 

### D. An existing electric furnace to 

### be used for baking BendIX 

### P-II coating on carbon brake disks in Building 507. 5. Emissions to the atmosphere from the indicated emission point shall not exceed the following rates and concentrations: A. 

### Exhaust stacks for 250 HP replacement boilers in Buildings 1624, 2104, and 2203: 1) NO,

- 40 ppm at 7% oxygen: 0.24 Ib/hr 2) CO

- 100 ppm at 7% oxygen B. Exhaust stack for 400 HP replacement boiler in Building 1904.

- NO,

- 1.84 Ib/hr 

### C. Exhaust stack for carbon brake coating in Building 507

- Phosphorous Oxides

- 1.33 lb/hr
6. Stack testing to 

### show compliance with the emission limitations of condition #5 shall be performed 

### as specified below: A. 

### Emission Point Pollutant Testing Retest Status

1. 

### Boiler exhaust stacks in Bldgs 1624. 1904. 2104. and 2203 NO, x*'* 

### CO ;';::/:>,:.'><. 8.>< I 

### 2. Carbon brake coating 4.2.4-499

### Mr. VanOrman Page 5

exhaust in Bldg 507 

## *,** I 

### **
. B. Testing Status (To be applied above) No initial testing is required. However, the Executive Secretary may require testing at any time in accordance with R307-1-3.4.1, UAC. The source shall be tested if directed by the Executive Secretary. 

## ** The testing method shall be submitted to 

### the Executive Secretary for approval before the testing is performed. The source shall be tested if directed by the Executive Secretary. § 

### The stack shall be tested for NO, emissions compliance within 30 days of startup using a portable testing instrument approved by the Executive Secretary. The boiler stack shall be retested every 30 boiler operating days 

# = 1V 

### days. The maximum time between tests shall be 35 boiler operating days. C. Test Procedure Boiler stack emissions testing shall be performed by the following procedure or an approved equivalent. Equivalency shall be determined by the Executive Secretary and approved prior to 

### tests being conducted. D. Sample Port A sampling port shall be installed in each boiler exhaust stack in accordance with 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method #1 or as approved by the Executive Secretary. The sample 'port shall be safely accessible to 

### the tester, operator, or inspector in accordance with OSHA standards. E. Operating Rate Each boiler stack shall be tested in accordance with the schedule in Condition #6.A.1. The steam production or operating rate during testing shall be set at 90% 

## ..±. 10% of the boilers capacity. F. Test Instrument The test procedure shall be conducted using a portable testing instrument approved by the Executive Secretary. The testing instrument shall be calibrated on site with a suitable NBS referenced or traceable calibration gas in accordance with the instruction of the test instrument. 

### 4.2.4-500

### Mr. Van Orman Page 

### 6

G. Test Procedure The test shall be conducted in the following manner: 1. The gas sample shall be drawn according to 

### the instructions of the test instrument being used. 

### 2. The sample value shall be determined from the test instrument. appropriate calculations made, and the data recorded. 

### H. Failed Boiler Status If the boiler is unable to 

### attain the emission limitation in condition #5, at any one ofthe operating rates specified in condition 6E, the boiler shall be assigned to a lower position on the "use priority list" (used as standby where possible) until the unit has been repaired or maintenance performed and a successful retest completed. Maintenance and repairs of any boiler that fails the periodical test shall be performed within 15 days or the boiler shall be idled. If a boiler, that has failed a test, is repaired and a successful retest completed according to 

### the limitations of Condition #5.A within 15 days, the boiler shall be determined to 

### not have been in violation. A boiler that fails the retest after repair, shall be idled until further repairs are made and a successful retest completed. 

### If the boiler demand requires the boiler to 

### be operated it shall be base loaded at the rate that will result in the lowest emissions rate possible until the boiler can be repaired and shown in compliance by the above test. Operating a boiler that has failed the above "retest after repair" shall be determined to be a violation of this AG. 

### I. Reports A copy of all test reports containing the test results. any calculations required. and the test instrument calibration data shall be retained by the owner/operator for two years. The reports shall be made available to the Executive Secretary or his agent upon request. An annual summary report of all the test results with a copy of the periodical reports shall be submitted to 

### the Executive Secretary no later than 

### 1anuary 

### 3I of each year for the previous calend ar year. 7. 

### ','isible emissions from the following emission points shall not exceed the following values: A. 

### 250 hp Boiler Building 1624 10% 4.2.4-501

### Mr. VanOrman Page 7

B. 

### 400 hp Boiler Building 1904 10% 

### C. 250 hp Boiler Building 2104 10% D. 250 hp Boiler Building 2203 10% E. 

### Paint spray booth Building 751 10% 

### F. Carbon brake furnace Building 507 0% Opacity observations of emissions from stationary sources shall be conducted in accordance with 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 9. Visible emissions from mobile sources and intermittent sources shall use procedures similar to 

### Method 9, but the requirement for observations to be made at 15 second intervals over a six minute period shall not apply. 8. The emissions of VOC from paint spray booth in Building 751 shall not exceed 0.040 tons per 12-month period without prior approval in accordance with R307-1-3. 

### L UAC. Compliance with the limitation shall be determined on a rolling 12-month total. Based on the first dav of each month a new 12-month total shall be calculated using the previous 12 months. The emissions of VOC from the spray booth shall be determined by maintaining a record of paints and thinners used. The record shall include the following data for each item used: 

## A. Name of paint or thinner B. 

### Weight in pounds per gallon C. Percent VOC by weight D. Amount used on a daily basis Records of consumption shall be kept for all periods when the plant is in operation. Records of consumption shall be made available to the Executive Secretary upon request, and shall include a period of two years ending with the date of the request. VOC emissions shall be determined by the following manner: VOC 

## = (% Volatile by Weight i 

### 100) ;< 

### (Density Ib/gal) ;< 

### (Gallons Consumed) / (2,000 lblton) The VOC content in pounds for each individual item or surface coating used shall be calculated, and then the total of all items shall be summed. such that the cumulative total shall not exceed the 0.04 tons per 12 month period as specified. 9. The owner/operator shall use only natural gas as a primary fuel and #2 

### fuel oil as a backup fuel in the replacement boilers located in Buildings 1624. 1904. 2104, and 2203. 

### If any other fuel is to be used, an AO shall be required in accordance with R307-1-3.1, UAC. 10. The sulfur content of any fuel oil burned shall not exceed 0.5% bv**wei~ht.** 

### The sulfur content of any fuel oil or diesel fuel shall be tested if directed by the Executive Secretary.

4.2.4-502

### Mr. VanOrman Page 8

II. 

### The paint spray booth shall be equipped with a set of paint arrestor particulate filters or equivalent to control particulate emissions. All air exiting the booth shall pass through this control system before being vented to the atmospnere. Equivalency shall be determined by the Executive Secretary. 12. AlI installations and facilities authorized by this AO shall be adequately and properly maintained. The owner/operator shall comply with R307-1-3.5 and 4.7, UAC. R307-1-3.5, UAC addresses emission inventory reponing requirements. R307-1-4.7. UAC addresses unavoidable breakdown reporting requirements. The owner/operator shall calculate/estimate the excess emissions whenever a breakdown occurs. The sum total of excess emissions shall be reported to the Executive Secretary for each calendar year no later than January 31 of the following year. 13. The Executive Secretary shall be notified in writing upon start-up of the installation. as an initial compliance inspection is required. Eighteen months from the date of this AO the Executive Secretary shall be notified in writing of the status of construction/installation if constructionlinstallation is not completed. At that time the Executive Secretary shall require documentation of the continuous construction/installation of the operation and may revoke the AO in accordance with 

### R307-1-3.1.5, UAC. Any future modifications to the equipment approved by this order must also be approved in accordance with R307-1-3.1.1, UAC. This AO in no way releases the owner or operator from any liability for compliance with all other applicable federal, state, and local regulations including the Utah Air Conservation Rules. Annual emissions from the source listed in this NOr are currently calculated at the following values: A. Total annual emissions for each of the 250 hp boilers located in Buildings 1624. : 104. and 2203 are the following values: I) 

### 0.06 tons/yr for Particulate 2) 0.056 tons/yr for PM lO 

### 3) 0.01 tons/yr for S02 4) 

### 0.47 tons/yr for NO, 5) 0.13 tons/yr for VOC 6) 0.46 tons/yr for CO B. 

### Total annual emissions for the 400 hp boiler located in building 1904 are the following values: 1) 0.11 tons/yr for Particulate 2) 

### 0.10 tons/yr for PM lO 3) 

### 0.02 tons/yr for S02 4) 3.68 tons/yr for NO, 5) 

### 0.22 tons/yr for VOC 4.2.4-503

### Mr. VanOrman Page 9
6) 

### 0.73 tonsiyr for CO C. 

### Total annual emissions for the paint booth located in building 751 is 0.04 tons/vr for VOc. D. Total annual emissions for the carbon brake coating process located in building 507 is 1.32 tons/vr for POx' E. Total annual emissions, based on 100 hr/yr operation, for each emergency generator located in buildings 1212, and 1213 are the following values: 1) 0.04 tons/yr for Paniculate 2) 0.04 tons/yr for PM lO 

### 3) 0.04 tons/yr for SO: 4) 0.67 tons/yr for NO, 5) 0.05 tons/yr for VOC 6) 0.14 tons/yr for CO 7) 0.01 tons/yr for Aldehydes

. These calculations are for the purposes of determining the applicability of PSD and nonattainment

area major source requirements of the UACR. Except forVOC, they are not to be used for purposes of determining compliance. _. Sincerely,

4.2.4-504

# -, .' ' f**,~~ nR~CEJVED**  DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

# (tAl**(lc~)** UN HEADQUARTERS OGDEN AIR LOGISTICS CENTER (AFMCI

# U I

### '1 

# 0 2 1993 HILLAIRFORCEBASE,UTAH '! 

# lAir Quality

/ .Q 

## I

# ~UN 1993 Mr F. Burnell

## y6rd~er Director,**Di~~on** 

## of Air Quality 1950 West ;North Temple p 

## 0**BO~",~4820** Salt 

# Lak:; City, UT 84114-4820 Re: Request for Minor Modification of Approval Order DAQE-492-92, 22 May 92, Replacement Boilers Bldgs 1624,1904, 2104, and 2203 Dear Mr 

## Cordner Condition 4. E. of the referenced Approval Order specifies testing each boiler stack at 90 percent, 70 percent and 50 percent of the boiler load. In order to ramp the boilers to the specified load levels and stabilize them for 5 minutes before commencing a test, we will have to add the by-pass exhaust ports and exhaust from 1,000 to 9,000 lbs of steam per hour. It 

## takes us approximately 3-4 hours per boiler to complete a test at the specified loads, during which time, the steam and energy is wasted and venting steam creates a very noisy atmosphere. This also does not constitute economical operation. These boilers may run close to 90 percent load during the winter months; however, during the summer months, they may run at 40-50 percent load or totally shutdown. We request the operating rates in condition 4. E. be deleted to allow testing at the existing load conditions and the firing rates. If 

## you have any questions, please feel free to contact Jay Gupta at 777-0359. Sincerely

# J~R.J~~ JAMES R. VAN ORMAN Director of Environmental Management

4,2.4-505,-...: ,-:l

- ­ .r--: .-" :

... 

# ---­ DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
Nonnan H. Bangerter Governor 1950 West Norm TernOle i'1eoly to: State of**L.::a~.** Kenneth L. Alkema Salt Lake City. Utah J,vlSlon 01 A" Oualltv Executive Director (801) 536-4000 Deoartmem of Envlronmenlal Qua:,tv F. Burnell Cordner Director (801) 536-4099 Fax Sail Lake City. Utah 84114·4820
DAQE-127-92 February 7, 1992
Newspaper Agency Legal Advertising Department 157 Regent Street Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
This letter will confirm the authorization to pUblish the attached NOTICE in the Salt Lake Tribune and the Deseret News on February 14, 1992. Please mail the invoice and affidavit of publication to the Utah State Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality, P.O. Box 16690, Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4820. Sinceli'ely, 

# d

./ l 

### I.,

/ Ii II 

# tLUVv' Cheery Love 

# r Office Technician Division of Air Quality MK:cl Enclosure



### 4.2.4-506NOTICE The following**no~ices** of intent to construct, submitted in accordance with Section 3.1, Utah Air**Conserva~ion** Rules, have been received for consideration by the Executive Secretary, Utah Air Quality Board:

1. Kim Heimsath Mountain Fuel 180 East 100 South Salt Lake City, Utah 84139

Twelve Natural Gas Fired IC Engines at Six Stations; One Natural Gas Fired Emergency Generator Six Locations, all new minor sources in attainment areas

The emissions from these sources can be summarized as follows: A) There are no existing emissions at any of the proposed locations. B) Controlled and uncontrolled emissions are equal at all locations. C) The emissions of NOx and CO are the only pollutants of concern. Emissions of NOx and CO are less than 20 TPY each at all of the proposed locations. Emissions of all other pollutants are negligible.

2. James R. Van Orman Headquarters Ogden Air Logistics Center Hill Air Force Base, Utah 84056-5990
Replacement Boilers in Buildings 1624, 1904, 2104, 2203 Paint Spray Booth in Building 751 Carbon Brake Coating in Building 507 Emergency Generators in Buildings 1212 and 1213 Davis County CDS A1 NA The emissions from the sources listed in this NOI will be as follows:


### 4.2.4-507

# - Total emissions from the boilers in Buildings 1624, 1904, 2104, and 2203: Current Emissions Particulate 0.16 ton/12-month period PMlO 0.14**S~** 0.04 NOx 5.00 CO 1.00 VOC 0.24 New Total Emissions Particulate 0.25 ton/12-month period PMIO 0.22**S~** 0.05 NO" 5.09 CO 1. 68 VOC 0.51 Total emissions from the paint spray booth in Building 751: VOC 0.04 ton/12-month period Total emissions from the Carbon Brake Coating Process: 1.32 ton/12-month period Total emissions from the Emergency Generators in buildings 1212, and 1213: New Total Emissions fer 2 Generators Particulate 0.08 ton/12-month period PMIO 0.07**S~** 0.08 NO" 1.34 CO 0.28 VOC 0.10 Aldehydes 0.02 The generators will each be run a maximum of 100 hours per 12-month period (for maintenance). The above**invent~ry** is relevant to the proposed facilities only in this Nor and not to all of HAFB. 

### 4.2.4-5083. John Cuthbertson LOS Hospital 325 8th Avenue Salt Lake City, Utah 84143 Boiler Replacement Salt Lake County CDS B NA

The emissions from this source will be as follows: Existing Emissions (including coal burning) Particulate 6.18 ton/yr PMlO 6.18**S~** 156.90 NOx 74.20 CO 31.'40 

### vee non meth 0.37 Increased (Decreased) Emissions

Particulate (5.05) ton/yr PMlO (5.05)**S~** (154.40) NOx (53.70) CO (24.00) 

### vee non meth 0.82 Total Emissions**'O?-~~.~** •. 1 ?t.e 2..1:**":".':)-:/y~** PMlO 1.13**S~** 2.48 NOx 20.50 CO 7.39 

### voe non meth 1.19



### 4.2.4-509The engineering evaluations and air quality impact analyses have been completed and no adverse air quality impacts are expected. It is the intent of the Executive Secretary to approve the construction projects.

The construction proposal and estimates of the effect on local air quality are available for pUblic**inspec~ion** and comment at the Division of Air Quality, Utah State Department of Environmental Quality, 1950 West North Temple, Salt Lake City, Utah 84116-0690. written comments received by the Division, at the

same address on or before March 14, 1992 will be considered in making the final decision on the approval/disapproval of the proposed construction.

If anyone so requests to the Executive Secretary in writing, within 15 days of publication of the Notice, a hearing will be held to explain the project and technical rationale for proposed action. A hearing will be scheduled as close

as practicable to the proposed project location. Comments obtained during a hearing will be evaluated and considered by the Executive Secretary before making a final decision on the approval/disapproval of the projects.

Date of Notice: February 14, 1992



### 4.2.4-510UTAH DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY NEW/MODIFIED SOURCE PLAN REVIEW James R. Van Orman Director of Environmental Management Headquarters Ogden Air Logistics Center Hill Air Force Base, Utah 84056-5990 ENGINEER: Nando Meli Jr. RE: Replacement Boilers in Buildings 1624, 1904, 2104, 2203 Paint Spray Booth in Building 751 Carbon Brake Coating in Building 507 Emergency Generators in Buildings 1212 and 1213 Davis County CDS A1 NA DATE: January 21, 1992 NOTICE OF INTENT DATED: July 30, 1991 PLANT CONTACT: Jay Gupta PHONE NUMBER: (801) 777-6742 PLANT LOCATION: Hill Air Force Base, Davis County FEES:

,.,.-., Filing Fee $1500.00 Computer Usage Fee $000.00 Notice to Paper $00.00 Travel

- 00 miles at $O.23/mile 

## sooo.oo Total $1500.00 APPROVALS: Engineering Unit Manager 

# / - .) ?-

.. Applicant Contact Made

l 

# Y/

4.2.4-511

# - I. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL A. Replacement Boilers Buildings 1624, 1904, 2104, and 2203 each have two existing boilers. One is 200 HP and the other one is 150 HP. An energy study has shown that if the larger boiler (200 HP) was to fail, then the mission essential load could not be entirely supplied by the smaller (150 HPJ boiler. There will be no change to the 200 HP boilers. HAFB proposes to replace the 150 HP boilers with new 250 HP boilers in Buildings 1624, 2104, and 2203. In Building 1904, the 150 HP boiler will be replaced with an existing 400 HP boiler which is presently idle. The new boilers will be Kewanee Classic III, 150 PSI, packaged scotch design firetube boilers or approved equal, capable of firing gas or oil. Gas will be used as the primary fuel with #2 oil being used as the back-up fuel. Boiler data and dimensions are shown in Attachment #1 of the NOI. Design criteria for the boilers**a~2 ~3**  ==::cws: Data for each 250 hp Boiler Boiler rating (each) 250 HP, three boilers required Primary fuel Natural Gas Bask-up Fuel #2 Oil Steam Rate 8,625 lbs/hr Total heat input 10.45 MM BTU/hr Total heat output 8.37 MM BTU/hr Thermal efficiency 80% Fuel firing rate Gas (1000 BTU/SCF) 174.16 SCFM 10,450 SCFH #2 Fuel Oil 140,000 BTU/Gal 74.4 GPH Estimated stack gas volume gas firing 4270 ACFM oil firing 4345 Flue gas temperature Data for 400 hp Boiler Boiler rating 400 HP Primary fuel .Natural Gas Bask-up Fuel #2 Oil Total heat input 16.74 MM BTU/hr Thermal efficiency 80t Fuel firing rate Gas (1000 BTU/SCF) 18,414 SCFH #2 Fuel Oil 140,000 BTU/Gal 131.5 GPH B. Paint Spray Booth A small bench type paint spray booth measuring approximately S'W x 7'H x 6'D, complete with paint arrestor filters, exhaust plenum, and a fan will be used to paint small aircraft instruments. Paint usage in very small quantities (20-25 gallons per year) and very low 

### voe content will be used (less than 3.5 Ibs VOC/gallon). At a face velocity of 150 feet per minute, exhaust volumetric flow rate in estimated to be 3500 SCFM. Vendor data on paint spray booth 

### :s Attachment 2 of the NOI. C. Carbon Brake Coating
2 

### 4.2.4-512An existing electric furnace, not being used at the present time, will be used for baking Bendix P-11 coating on aircraft carbon discs in Building 507. The furnace measures approximately 3' x 3' x 6' deep. Six SCFM continuous nitrogen purge will be used. A small vent pipe will exhaust vapors to the atmosphere. P11 coating decomposes on heating to form phosphorous oxides. D. Emergency Generators Two emergency generators (with a capacities of 200 KW and 125 KW) will be installed in Buildings 1212 and 1213. They will serve as a back-up power source to equipment in these buildings. A 1900 gallon above ground diesel fuel tank will be used as a fuel source. II. EMISSION SUMMARY The emissions from the sources listed in this NOI will be as follows: Total emissions from the boilers in Buildings 1624, 1904, 2104, and 2203: Current Emissions Particulate 0.16 ton/12-month period PMlO 0.14**S~** 0.04 NOx 5.00 CO 1.00 VOC 0.24 New Total Emissions Particulate 0.25 ton/12-month period PMlO 0.22**S~** 0.05 NO 5.09 x CO 1. 68 VOC 0.51 Total emissions from the paint spray booth in Building 751: VOC 0.04 ton/12-month period Total emissions from the Carbon Brake Coating Process: 1.32 ton/12-month period Total emissions from the Emergency Generators in buildings 1212, and 1213: New Total Emissions for 2 Generators Particulate 0.08 ton/12-month period PM 10 0.07**S~** 0.08 NOx 1.34 CO 0.28 VOC 0.10 Aldehydes 0.02 The generators will each be run a maximum of 100 hours per 12-month period. The above inventory is relevant to the proposed facilities only in this Nor and not to**~he** entire HAFB. The total inventory for HAFB is not currently available.

3 

### 4.2.4-513III. BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (BACT) ANALYSIS BACT will be required at all emission points. The following is a description of the pollution control equipment proposed and the recommendation of the Engineering Section: Boiler Replacements The emission points under review in this area are the boiler stacks. The Engineering Section recommends the following limitations as BACT for the new boilers: A. NOx - 40 ppm at 7\ oxygen (measured as NOz) B. CO

- 100 ppm at 7\ oxygen C. 10\ opacity The proposed Low-NOx natural gas fired boilers in buildings 1624, 2104, and 2203 are cesigned to meet these**li~itations.** No other options were considered. A cost analysis was done on retrofitting the proposed 400 hp boiler in building 1904 with a low NOx burner. After reveiwing the cost analysis it was determined that it would not be cost effective to equip the boiler with a low NOx burner. Paint Spray Booth The emissions from the paint spray booth will be controlled by using a paint arrestor filters with an opacity limit of 10\. A low VOC compliant paint, 3.5 lbs VOC/gallon or less, and a limit on the total VOCs is being recommended as BACT at this facility. The Engineering Section recommends the following limits as BACT: A. 10\ opacity B. VOC emissions from booth limited to 0.04 ton/yr Carbon Brake Coating Hill AFB has indicated in their Nor that there will be no controls on the emissions to the atmosphere from the carbon brake coating process in Building 507. Screening type modeling was submitted by HAFB that indicated the emission concentration would be 0.011 mg POx/m3 at the property line, located 150 meters from Building 507. The Threshold Limit Value for phosphoric acid is 1 mg/m3

. This value was divided by 100 to give an acceptable limit value for a unhealthy person of 0.010 mg/m3

. Due to the conservative nature of modeling, the Engineering Section recommends that this process be accepted with no controls on the emissions with 0\ opacitv as BACT. Emergency Generators The NOI indicated that there would be no controls on the emissions from the emergency generators. The Engineering Section knows of no controls at this time for small diesel engines. A limitation on the number of hours of operation and fuel quality is the best current control for this type of source. The Engineering Section recommends that BACT for the generators be the following: A. 20\ opacity

4 

### 4.2.4-514B. S.ulfur content of diesel fuel that is equal to or less than the sulfur content of on-highway diesel fuel C. Annual hours of operation for maintenance not to exceed to 100 per generator IV. APPLICABILITY OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS AND UTAH AIR CONSERVATION RULES This Notice of Intent is for a minor modification to an existing major source. It is not a new major source or a major modification. The following federal regulations and state rules have been examined to determine their applicability to this Notice of Intent: 1. R446-1-3.1, UAC

- Notice of intent required for a modified source. This rule applies. 2. R446-1-3.1.5, UAC

- Continuous program of construction required to begin within eighteen months of Approval Order date. If a continuous program of construction is not proceeding, the**Exec~tive** Secretary may revoke**t~e A?p~oval** **Orc2~.** 3. R-446-1-3.1. 7 (A), UAC

- Notice of Intent not required for fuel burning equipment with a rated capacity of less than 5 x 106 BTU per hour using no other fuel than natural gas. A Notice of Intent is required because the boilers have a capacity greater than 5 x 106 BTU per hour, and they will use #2 :uel oil 

### as a back-up fuel. 4. R-446-1-3.l.7 (F), UAC

- Notice of Intent not required for the use of certain compounds which are not photochemically reactive. This list includes 1,1, 1-trichloroethane. However, if the source is emitting more than 10 tons/yr of any compound, a Notice of Intent must be filed. This rule applies. 5. R-446-1-3.1.8 (A), UAC

- Application of best available control technology (BACT) required at all emission points. This rule applies. 6. R-446-1-3.1.8 (D), UAC

- Enforceable offset of 1:1 required for new sources or modifications which would produce an emission increase greater than or equal to 25.00 tons per year of any combination of PMIO, S02, and NOx• This is required in Salt Lake, Davis, and Utah Counties and in any area that impacts these three counties as defined in the rule. The effective date is November 15, 1990. The sources listed in this NOI produce a combined emission rate that is less than 25.00 tons per year. No offset is required. 7. R-445-1-3.1.9, UAC

- Rules for =elocation of temporary sources. This source is a permanent source. Therefore, this rule does not apply. 8. R-446-l-3. 1. 12, UAC

- Requirement for installation of low-NOx burners on all existing sources whenever existing fuel combustion burners are replaced, unless the replacement is not physically practical or cost effective. The effective date is November 15, 1990. This rule does not apply as there are no replacement burners. However, BACT requires the 10w-NOx burners on the new boilers that have been proposed. 9. R-446-1-3.2.1, UAC

- Particulate emission limitations for existing sources which are located in a nonattainment area.**~his** rule has been superseded by the PMlO SIP, except for Weber County. The effective date is November 15, 1990. The sources listed in Weber
5 

### 4.2.4-515

# -- county are as follows: A. Farmers Grain Coop B. Fife Rock Products C. Interpace Corporation D. Parsons Asphalt Plant E. Pillsbury Company F. Teledyne Incinerator G. Gibbons and Reed Asphalt This source is not listed in the SIP. Therefore, this rule does not apply. 10. R-446-1-3.3.2, UAC

- Review requirements for new major sources or major modifications which are located in a nonattainment area or which impact a nonattainment area. This Notice of Intent represents a minor modification to an existing major source. Therefore, this rule does not apply. 11. R-44f;-l-3.S, UAC

- Emi£"sion i.r;nentory reporting :-2:;,..:':"::-ements. This rule requires any source which emits 2S tons or more per year of any pollutant to submit an emission inventory to the Division of Air Quality at least every third year or as determined necessary by the Executive Secretary. HAFB must comply with this rule. 12. R-446-1-3.6.3, UAC

- PSD Increment Consumption

- This rule lists the allowable PSD increment consumption. Under the PSD rules, the entire state has been triggered for TSP,**S~,** and NO • The allowable x increments are as follows: 

### A. Class I areas 

# -, 1) S ug/m3 (annual) 2) 10 ug/m3 (24 hour) B. Class II areas 1) 19 ug/m3 (annual) 2) 37 ug/m3 (24 hour) 

### A. Class I areas 1) 2 ug/m3 (annual) 2) 5 ug/m3 (24 hour) 3) 25 ug/m3 (3 hour) B. Class II areas 1) 20 ug/m3 (annual) 2) 91 ug/m3 (24 hour) 3) 512 ug/m3 (3 hour) A. Class I areas - 2.5 ug/m3 (annual) 

### B. Class II areas - 25 ug/m3 (annual)

6 

### 4.2.4-51613.

14.

15.

16.

17.

IS. There are also Class III increments, which do not apply in Utah. The above increments apply at all locations, unless the area is already nonattainment. The entire increment may not be available at all locations due to previously permitted sources consuming increment. This source is located in a nonattainment area. R-446-1-3.6.5 (b), UAC

- Prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) review requirements for new**majo~** sources or major modifications. This Notice of Intent does**not~represent** a new major source or a major modification under PSD rules. Therefore, this rule does not apply. { i R446-1-3.6.6 UAC

- Increment violations. Th"is rule requires the UACB to promulgate a plan and implement rules to eliminate any PSD increment violations which occur in the state. No known violations have yet occurred. R-446-1-3.8, UAC Stack height rule. This rule limits the creditable height of stacks to that height determined to be good engineering practi=e. The**formul~s** used to determine good engineering practice are found in 40 CFR 51.100. A deminimus height of 65 meters (213.2 feet) is allowed. The sources listed in this NOI have no stacks which exceed 65 meters in height. It is in compliance with this rule. R-446-1-3 .11, UAC

- Visibility screening analysis requirements. This rule requires all new major sources or major modifications to undergo a visibility screening analysis to determine visibility impact on any mandatory Class I area. This Notice of Intent does not represent a new major source or a major modification under UACR rules. Therefore, this rule does not apply. R-446-1-4.1.2, UAC

- 20\ opacity limitation at all emission points unless a more stringent limitation is required by New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) or BACT or National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS). In this case, some points, which are subject to NSPS or BACT, will have to meet more stringent opacity limitations as follows: A. Boilers, Building 1624 

### - 10% opacity B. Boilers, Building 1904 

# - 10\ opacity C. Boilers, Building 2104 

### - 10\ opacity D. Boilers, Building 2203 

# - 10% opacity E. Paint spray booth, Building 751


### - 10\ opacity F. Carbon brake furnace, Building 507 

# - 0\ opacity G. Emergency generator, Building 1212 20\ opacity H. Emergency generator, Building 1213 

### - 20\ opacity An opacity of 0\ is recommended for the carbon brake coating exhaust stack located in Building 507 due to the toxicity of the POx emissions. R-446-1-4.1.9, UAC

- EPA Method 9 to be used for visible emission observations. This rule applies.

7 

### 4.2.4-51719. R-446-1-4.2.1, UAC

- Sulfur content limitations in oil and coal used 

# --.." for combustion. This source burns natural gas as a primary fuel source, and uses #2 fuel oil as a back up fuel source for its boilers. The emergency generators will use diesel fl,lel. The limitation in the rule is 0.85 pounds of sulfur per 100 BTU heat input. The proposed fuel oil will be limited to 0.50% by weight sulfur and the engine fuel will be recommended as "on-highway" grade fuel. 20. R-446-1-4.7, UAC

- Unavoidable breakdown reporting requirements. This rule applies. Section 4.7.1 discusses reporting requirements. A breakdown for any period longer than 2 hours must be reported to the Executive Secretary within 3 hours of the beginning of the breakdown, if reasonable, but in no case longer than 18 hours after the beginning of the breakdown. A written report is required within 7 calendar days. The report shall include the estimated quantity of pollutants (total and excess). Section 4.7.2**d~scusses** penalties.

, 21. R-446-1-4.9, UAC

- Review requirements for**volat~le** organic compound**(VOC~** sources located**~~** a nonattainment area for ozone constructed in 1980 or earlier. This rule does not apply to the paint spray booth at Hill AFB in building 751 because the booth is new. However, the rule may have been used as a guidance document in determining BACT for the spray booth. 22. R-446-1-5, UAC

- Emergency episode requirements. This rule applies. 23. ,,-446-:'-"7, Ul.C

- riir .c-'oi.l.uc::..on Episocie Plan

- This plan prov:..cies c:he basis fer**~aking** action to prevent air**poll~tant concen~~ations**  :rom reaching levels which could endanger the public health, or to abate such concentrations should they occur. All sources in a nonattainment area or impacting a nonattainment area must submit a plan outlining what they will do in an emergency episode. This regulation applies to Salt Lake, Davis, and Utah Counties. This rule applies. 24. New Source Performance Standards (NSPS)

- There are no NSPS for any of the proposed industrial process. 25. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS)

­ There is no NESHAPS for this industrial process. 26. National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)

- This source is located in Davis County,. which is a nonattainment area for ozone. The Division of Air Quality guidelines do not call for this source, to be modeled for any pollutant. However, modeling was done for POx', The Division has found through experience that, because of the small quantity of emissions involved and the conservative predictions made by modeling, a source or emission point of this small size is very unlikely to cause a new violation of the NAAQS or make a significant contribution to the existing violation for ozone. Screening type modeling was submitted, on the carbon brake coating process in bldg. 507, by HAFB that indicated the emission concentration would be 0.011 mg POx /m3 at the property line, located 150 meters from the building. The Threshold Limit Value for phosphoric acid is 1 mg/m3 • This value was divided by 100 to give an acceptable limit value for a unhealthy person of 0.010 mg/m3 • Due to the conservative nature of modeling, the Engineering Section recommends that this process be accepted with no controls on the emissions with 0% opacity as BACT.

8 

### 4.2.4-51827. 40 CFR 60.14, Definition of Modification Any physical or operational change to an existing facility which results in an increase in the emission rate to the atmosphere of any pollutant to which an NSPS standard applies. The following are not by themselves considered modifications: 1) Maintenance, repair, and replacement 2) An increase in production rate of an existing facility, if that increase can be accomplished without a capital expenditure on that facility 3) An increase in the hours of operation 4) Use of an alternative fuel or raw material if, prior to the date any standard under this part becomes applicable to that source type, as provided by 60.1, the existing facility was designed to accommodate that alternative use 5) The addition or use of any system or c!evice whose primary function is the reduction of air pollutants 6) Relocation or change in ownership Also see Section 1.92, which is the State's definition. It is a planned increase in emissions. This Notice of Intent is a minor modification. 28. 40 CFR 60.15, Definition of Reconstruction

- the replacement of components of an eXisting facility to such an extent that: 1) The fixed capital cost of the new components exceeds 50\ of the fixed capital cost that would be required to construct a comparable entirely new facility and 2) It is technologically and economically feasible to meet the applicable standards set forth in this part This Notice of Intent is not a reconstruction. 29. R-446-1-1.89, Definition of Major Modification It means any physical change in or change in the method of operation of a major source that would result in a significant net emission increase of any pollutant. A net emissions increase that is significant for VOC shall be considered significant for ozone. A physical change or change in the method of operation shall not include: A. Routine maintenance, repair, or replacement B. Use of an alternative fuel or raw material by reason of an order under Section 2a and b of the ESECA of 1974 or by reason of a natural gas curtailment plan pursuant to the Federal Power Act C. Use of an alternative fuel by reason of an order under Section 125 of the CAA D. Use of an alternative fuel at a steam generating unit to the extent that the fuel is generated from municipal solid waste E. Use of an alternative fuel or raw material by a source:

9 

### 4.2.4-519

# - 1 ) which the source was capable of accommodating before January 6, 1975, unless such change would be prohibited under any enforceable permit condition 2) which the source is otherwise approved to use 

### F. An increase in the hours of operation 

### or the production rate unless such change would be prohibited under any enforceable permit condition 

# , t G. Any change in ownership at a source
This Notice of Intent is not a major modification. V. RECOMMENDED APPROVAL ORDER CONDITIONS l. Hill Air Force Base shall install and operate the following: A. The boilers located in Bt:ildings 162L.!, 1904, 2104, and 2203 B. The paint s,pray booth located in Building 751 

## c. The carbon brake coating process located in Building 507 D. The emergency generators located in Buildings 1212 and 1213 These shall all be operated according to the information submitted in the Notice of Intent dated April 24, 1991 and additional information submitted to the Executive Secretary dated July 30, 1991; December 26, 1991; and January 8, 1992. 

# - A copy of this Approval Order shall be posted on site and shall be available to the employees who operate the air emission producing equipment. All employees who operate the air emission producing equipment shall receive instruction as to their responsibilities in operating the equipment in compliance with all of the relevant conditions. 2. The approved installations shall consist of the following equipment: A. Replacement boilers located in Buildings 1624, 2104, and 2203, rated at 250 HP

- The boilers shall be equipped with 10w-NOx burners using natural gas as the primary fuel, with #2 fuel oil being used as the back-up fuel. B. Placing of an existing 400 HP boiler in Building 1904 using natural gas as the primary fuel with #2 fuel oil being used as the back-up fuel C. A paint spray booth equipped with paint arrestor filters located in Building 751 and using low VOC compliance paint. D. An existing electric furnace to be used for baking Bendix P-11 coating on carbon brake disks in Building 507. E. Two emergency generators located in: a) Building 1212

- generator rated at 200 KW b) Building 1213

- generator rated at 125 KW

10 

### 4.2.4-5203. Emissions to the atmosphere from the indicated emission point shall not exceed the following rates and concentrations: A. Exhaust stacks for 250 HP replacement boilers in Buildings 1624, 2104, and 2203: 1) NO

- 40 ppmdv at 7% oxygen; 0.24 lb/hr x 2) CO

- 100 ppmdv at 7% oxygen 

### B. Exhaust stack for 400 HP replacement boiler in Building 1904,

- NOx - 1.84 lb/hr C. Exhaust stack for carbon brake coating in Building 507

- POx

­**~.33** lb/hr 

# i
4. Stack testing to show compliance with the em4ssion limitations of condition#3 shall be performed as specified**~low:** A. Emission Point Pollutant Testing Retest Status 1. Boiler exhaust stacks in Bldgs 1624, 1904, 2104, and 2203 NOx 

### *** CO 

### * 

### * 2. Carbon brake coating exhaust in Bldg 507 

### */** ** B. Testing status (To be applied above) No initial testing is required. However, theExecutive 

### * Secretary may require testing at any time in accordance with R446-1-3.4.1, UAC. The source shall be tested if directed by the Executive Secretary. The testing method shall be submitted to the Executive 

### ** Secretary for approval before the testing is performed. The source shall be tested if directed by the Executive Secretary. The stack shall be tested for NOx emissions compliance within 30 days of startup using a portable testing instrument approved by the Executive secretary. 

### *** The boiler stack shall be retested every 30 boiler operating days ± 10 days. The maximum time between tests shall be 35 boiler operating days. C. Test Procedure Boiler stack emissions testing shall be performed by the following procedure or an approved equivalent. Equivalency shall be determined by the Executive Secretary and approved prior to tests being conducted.
J. Sample Port A sampling port shall be installed in each boiler exhaust 11 

### 4.2.4-521stack in accordance with 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method #1 or as approved by the Executive Secretary. The sample port shall be safely accessible to the tester, operator, or inspector in accordance with OSHA standards. E. Operating Rate Each boiler stack shall be tested in accordance with the schedule in Condition #4.A.l. The steam production or operating rate during testing shall be performed under the following three operating rates: 1) 90% %10% of the boiler's capacity 2) 70% ±10% 3) 50% HO% F. Test Instrument The**~~=~** procadure shall be**conduc~e~ us~ng**  a portable testing instrument approved by the Executive Secretary. The testing instrument shall be calibrated on site with a suitable NBS referenced or traceable calibration gas in accordance with the instruction of the test instrument. G. Test Procedure The test shall be conducted in the following manner: 1. The boiler shall be:· a) ramped to the designated production rate in Condition 4.E, b) allowed to stabilize for a minimum of 5 minutes. 2. The gas sample shall be drawn according to the instructions of the test instrument being used. 3. The sample value shall be determined from the test instrument, appropriate calculations made, and the data recorded. H. Failed Boiler**Sta~us** If the boiler is unable to attain the emission limitation in condition #3, at anyone of the operating rates specified in condition 4E, the boiler shall be assigned to a lower position on the "use priority list" (used as standby where possible) until the unit has been repaired or maintenance performed and a successful retest completed. Maintenance and repairs of any boiler that fails the periodical test shall be performed within 15 days or the boiler shall be idled. If a boiler, that has failed a test, is repaired and a successful retest completed according to the limitations of Condition #3.A within 15 days, the boiler shall be determined to not have been in violation.

12 

### 4.2.4-522A boiler that fails the retest after repair, shall be idled until further repairs are made and a successful retest completed. If the boiler demand requires the boiler to be operated it shall be base loaded at the rate that will result in the lowest emissions rate possible until the boiler can be repaired and shown in compliance by the,above test
.



### . Operating a boiler that has failed thet above

.. retest after repair" may be determined to be a**viola~ion** of this Approval Order. :

# , I. Reports A copy of all test reports containing the test results, any calculations required, and the test instrument calibration data shall be retained by the owner/operator for 2 years. The reports shall be made available to the Executive Secretary or his agent upon request. An annual summary report of all the test results with a copy of the periodical reports shall be submitted to the Executive Secretary no later than January 31 of each year for the previous calendar year. 5. Visible emissions from the following emission points shall not exceed the following values: A. 250 hp Boiler Building 1624 10\ B. 400 hp Boiler Building :";'04 10\ C. 250 hp Boiler Building 2104 10%
D. 250 hp Boiler Building 2203 10% E. Paint spray booth, Building 751 10% 

### F. Carbon brake furnace, Building 507 0% G. 200 kw Emergency generator Building 1212 20% H. 150 kw Emergency generator Building 1213 20% Opacity observations of emissions from stationary sources shall be condocted in accordance with 40 CFR 60, Aooend ix A, /-Aotbod 9. Visible emissions from mobile sources and intermittent sources shall use procedures similar to Method 9, but the requirement for observations to be made at 15 second intervals over a six minute period shall not apply. 6. The emissions of VOC from building 751 shall not exceed 0.040 tons per 12-month period without prior approval in accordance with R446­ 1-3.1, UAC. Compliance with the limitation shall be determined on a rolling 12-month total. Based on the first day of each month a new 12-month total shall be calculated using the previous 12 months. The emissions of VOC from the spray booth shall be determined by maintaining a record of paints and thinners used. The record shall include the following data for each item used: A. Name of paint or thinner B. Weight in pounds per gallon C. Percent VOC by weight D. Amount used on a daily basis
13 

### 4.2.4-523Records of consumption shall be kept for all periods when the plant is in operation. Records of consumption shall be made available to the Executive Secretary upon request, and shall include a period of two years ending with the date of the request. VOC emissions shall be determined by the following manner: VOC (% Volatile by Weight / 100) 

### * (Density lb/gal) 

### * (Gallons Consumed) / (2,000 lb/ton) The VOC content in pounds for each individual item or surface coating used shall be calculated, and then the total of all items shall be summed, such that the cumulative total shall not exceed the 0.04 tons per 12 month period as specified. 7. The emergency generators in Buildings 1212 and to 100 hours of maintenance operation per period. If excess hours of operation are use conditions, the Executive Secretary shall be 213 shall be limited ngine per 12-month ecause of emergency tified. Compliance with the limitation shall be determ ned on a rolling 12­ month total. Based on the first day of each month a new 12-month total shall be calculated using the previous 12 months. Records of hours of operation shall be kept for all periods when the plant is in operation. Records of hours of operation shall be made available to the Executive Secretary or his representative upon request and shall include a period of two years ending with the date of the request. Hours of operation shall be determined by supervisor**mOn~LOrl.ng** ana mal.llLal.r.ing or an operaLions log. 8. The owner/operator shall use only natural gas as a primary fuel and #2 fuel oil as a backup fuel in the replacement boilers located in Buildings 1624, 1904, 2104, and 2203. If any other fuel is to be used, an Approval Order shall be required in accordance with R446-1­ 3.1, UAC. 9. The sulfur content of any fuel oil burned shall not exceed 0.5% by weight. The sulfur content of any fuel oil or diesel fuel shall be tested if directed by the Executive Secretary. 10. The paint spray booth shall be equipped with a set of paint arrestor particulate filters or equivalent to control particulate emissions. All air exiting the booth shall pass through this control system before being vented to the atmosphere. Equivalency shall be determined bv the Executive Secretary. 11. All installations and facilities authorized by this Approval Order shall be adequate1y and properly maintained. The owner/operator shall comply with R446-1-3.5 and 4.7, UAC. R446-1-3.5, UAC addresses emission inventory reporting requirements. R446-1-4.7, UAC addresses unavoidable breakdown reporting requirements. The owner/operator shall calculate/estimate the excess emissions whenever a breakdown occurs. The sum total of excess emissions shall be reported to the Executive secretary for each calendar year no later than January 31 of the following year. 12. The Executive Secretary shall be notified in writing upon start-up of the installation, as an initial compliance inspection is required. Eighteen months from the date of this Approval Order the Executive Secretary shall be notified in writing of the status of construction/installation if construction/installation is not completed. At that time the Executive Secretary shall require documentation of the continuous construction/installation of the 

# - 14 

### 4.2.4-524operation and may revoke the Approval Order in accordance with R446­ 1-3.1.5, UAC. Any future modifications to the equipment approved by this order must also be approved in accordance with R446-l-3.l.l, UAC. This Approval Order in no way releases the owner or operator from any liability for compliance with all other applicable federal, state, and local regulations including the Utah Air Conservation Rules. Annual emissions from the source listed in this Nor are currently calculated at the following values: A. Total annual emissions for each of the 250 hp boilers located in Buildings 1624, 2104, and 2203 are the following values: 1) 0.06 tons/yr for Particulate 2) 0.056 tons/yr for PHlO 3) 0.01 tons/yr for**S~** 4) 0.47 tons/yr for NOx 5) 0.13 tons/yr for VOC 6) 0.46 tons/yr for CO B. Total annual emissions for the 400 hp boiler located in building 1904 are the following values: 1) 0.11 tons/yr for Particulate L) 0.10 tons/yr for PMlO :; ) 0.02 t.ons/yr :or S02 4) 3.68 tons/yr for NOx 5) 0.22 tons/yr for VOC 6) 0.73 tons/yr for CO
c. Total annual emissions for the paint booth located in building 751 is 0.04 tons/yr for vac. D. Total annual emissions for the carbon brake coating process located in building 507 is 1.32 tons/yr for PO y • E. Total annual emissions, based on 100 hr/yr operation, for each emergency generator located in buildings 1212, and 1213 are the following values: 1 ) 0.04 tons/yr for Particulate 2) 0.04 tons/yr for PMlO 3) 0.04 tons/yr for**S~** 4) 0.67 tons/yr for NOx 5) 0.05 tons/yr for voc 6) 0.14 tons/yr for CO 7) 0.01 tons/yr for Aldehydes These calculations are for the purposes of determining the applicability of PSD and nonattainment area major source requirements of the UACR. They are not to be used for purposes of determining compliance. NANDO\WP\HAFB-GB.ENI

15 

### 4.2.4-525

# MEMORANDUM

Hill Air Force file, Engineering Section, DAQ FROM: Nando Heli Jr., Environmental Health Engineer SUBJECT: Justification for the use of an existing 400 hp boiler in building 1904. DATE: January 15, 1992
Hill Air Force Base submitted. some information dated January 8, 1992 to substantiate their claim for using an existing 400 hp boiler. In building 1904 they are replacing a 150 hp boiler with an existing boiler and burner. The letter provides some information as to the cost effectiveness of using the existing burner and not a low NOx burner. Carl Broadhead talked to a manufacturer representative and came up with the following information: Cost of low NOx burner $45,000.00 Cost for installation and chamber modificataion 25,000.00 Total cost 70,000.00 Using Hill A.F. Base information to get a cost analysis for the amount per year for NO reduction: x Annualized capital cost assuming 20 year life at 8% rate $70,000.00 x capital recovery factor

70,000.00 x 0.1019 $ 7,l33.00/year for 20 years NO emissions with existing burner = 3.68 tons/yr x NOx emissions with low NOx burner 

## = 1. 67 tons/yr NO reduction 

## = 2.01 tons/yr x S/ton of NOx reduction 

## = S 7,133.00/year 2.01 tons/year S3556.00/ton It would not be cost effective to require the use of a low NOx burner in building 1904. Therefore, the Engineering section recomends that the existing boiler be used without a low NOx burner.

==============================================================================



### 4.2.4-526

## "\ I': Lj " 

### / d L( I ;' 

### t; : Ii) I J f":I (I i 161 /
..., .**i.:J:,/~,-:**



# . --. !'

### ".,... 

### I', 

## it/J/. 

# c. C

## i

,... [',ei 

## (, /3 (r'( 

## &

-,=-o ':-:0



## P /7 -: Ie t: 

### '<-7 j l c c' 

### T 

## s,o 

# c. CS

### & 1.'\**/~,r** f


## f ,s·r
. ) -'j

101. :>'**o,~** )

### !~, ]


# -**·~Li-?** C'. ci 

## /



# - Lln

..- 

## ·/If**~~;J('r,** 

# TSf -::: 

## S 

# ( P**f~~l~** 

# -

- 

## C' C( 

# SCA.

.... 

## ILl L'" :x.. 

## \

.... 

## CO .." \

- i " 

### C \, l' 

### (,' 

### i

# (r, / 

### .', 

### e, C ) 

## .{ I



# - (,:1q J-e-n

## /~ r­



# (C.-;jCi) 

# - c,**~&** 

## Ie,

# I~..

f .' \ ( ,"' 

# -, \ -::: 

## r .. 

# Lc,el ) l- 

### I

# "**i~,~** -"i ) \.., 

# 11'\**/~)A.** <..r· o

I \ \ 

# ( c.. " 

## (
.... : 

## ;-..



## / \ 1- i

### ;(~ ). 

## \: 2 \ ) 

# - S-, C' 

# q / 

## -{'''-/rI 7"­

## C,~ 

## h,) I ,(


# ­ ( ( 

# :'73-)

-**~.** 

## l ( 

# I" 

# IT'

. ,.. I 

# (c. t? ) I 

# l: .J.

## ~\ I 

### -: 

## 6, k (

# )'\~r**.~**

-/':3.;;:::( ::..,"\ I fl' 4)



### 4.2.4-527

## I 

## I (c?4 ! Jt' q ,'04 : 

## of' 

## Ptr1 

# ID I -fOft!. 

# 4 7 c t 

## i 1'\ / I. l/

. \t .... '"
I I 

### i ! 

## --... I 

## ;YOffyYj I 

## I IDle 

## I tj 1'1 ."'1 kit:. i.J

# f**~5:,** '1l t

### l 

## J, ft'r:, )000 

### r11!. 

## / ,'ft'**~J** 

## /D (.p 

# d d


# -
- /":)g"t

) 7 fj I.j, 

# to '?? Me

# Ie..
IY'l lJ

# I- .J-'.J­ /I') J

## ~o.**'~m** 

# NOL d"" ,.., ole. i,.) 

## f 

# ::.

3//)g / '- bY!()

## -_~ 

## -ZJ...-+-­**~OOU** 

## Ii:; v_",

. rn?>**~<~** .

,:. 

# =),**O~ 9'fs~**  (tu-I(

## J~" ff1

# )~O~9Ir].'~·/Q'f..)O'l**l'8jO,~'1SLrl"1** -=

# J,~7J9f,J'**-JO'l/~;.\ ~+-l**  

## l/bOCK )(

## ~)",\;'!I?l~/r/v,7'~ set
. ....., ( II 't, \) 

### t 

### Lf

## be;;- J.- '1,&/ 

### "lfj ) 

## / ' '17;;; 

## ? 

# I /r5 b 

# /0" 0 ...., ...1 

### l/O Q 0 

### Jr r - . 

## 0 I 

### LI) 

# NOA. 

### /)-\,'" 

## hr r 

# JI"



# -

4.2.4-528ADOPTED VALUES I ADOPTED VALUES , I, TWA STEL ; TWA STH 

### ! Substance [CAS N] ppm·' mg/m3t / ppm·' mg/m3t' I I Subslance [CAS N] ppm·' mg/m3t / ppm·' mg/m 3t) I ·Phenol 1108-95-21­ 

# I Plasler of Paris, 

### see Calcium sulfaIe Skin (1987)

___ 5 19

- ­ Platinum 1744000-41 0­ Phenothiazine 1!I2-84-21­ 

## I Melal (1981)

.... - 1

- N on Skin (1986)

.......... - 5

­ Soluble salls, as PI (\981) 0002

- ·N-Phenyl-beta-naphthyl- I I Polychlorobiphenyls, 

### see Chlorodiphenyls amine (\35-88-61 (1979) _. A2 A2
- 

### - N 

## I Polyletrafluoroelhylene tp-Phenylenediamine 

### .q: decomposition products 1106-5O-31(

- Skin) 0.1

- 

# i (1972)

...... - 81

-­ Phenyl elher 1101·8481. , Portland cemenl (1986)

. IOle' 

# .

vapor (1976)

........... 1 7.0 2 14 I Potassium hydroxide I Phenylelhylene, see Styrene, monomer I 

### i (1310-58-31 (1977)

- ....... C 2 ·.Phenyl glycidyl ether (PGE) _Idl I ·Propane 174-98·61 (1981)'. (122·60-11 (1002)

.... 1 6.1

- 

### ­ t ooP/lenylhydrazine 

# !**.pr~,~~~~ lS~II\~~~)**  . A2 A2 110063-01- Skin

..... (5,A2) (22,A2) (1O,A2) (44,A2) ! Propargyl alcohol .Phenyl mercaptan : 11 07-19-71-Skin (\987)

_ 1 2.3 (108-98-51 (1978)

....... 0.5 2.3 - - Phenylphosphine

## I·{J-~~~~)iola.ctone**.'~7.57** ..81

.. 0.5,A2 1.5,A2

1638·21-1) (1977)

....... C 005 C 0.23

- - tPropionic acid 179.0941

.. 10 30 (15) (45) Phorale 1298·02·21­ Propoxur 1114,26-11 (1987) 0.5

Skin /19761

............ 0.05 0.2 n-Propyl acelate Phosdrin, 

### see Mevinphos 1109-6041 (1976)

...... 200 835 250 1040 Phosgeno 175·44·51 (1978)

... 0.1 040

- ­ n-Propyl alcohol 171-23·81­ Phosphine 1780351·21 (1976) 03 042 1 14 

# I Skin (19761

.. 200 492 250 615 Phosphoric acid _Idl , Propylene 1115-07·11 (19761 17664·38·21 (1976)

. - 1
- 3 ' Propylene dichloride Phosphorus (yellow) 

# I 178-87·5) (1976)

...... - - 75 347 110 509

17723-14-0) (19861

.... 0.1 ,-Propylene glycol dinilrate tphosphorus oxychloride : 164234341- Skin (1985)

. 005 0.34 11002587-31

............ 0.1 0.63 (0.5) (31) 

### I Propylene glycol mono- Phosphorus pentachloride melhyl ether

11002&-13-61 (1980)

.. 0.1 0.85 1107-98-21 (1976)

...... 100 369 150 553 Phosphorus pentasullide

11314-8031 (1976)

.. 1 3 (II) Simple aspl'/Xianl; see definition in Ihe 'Introduclion to Ihe Chernical SubsI3nces." Phosphorus trichloride (e) The value is lor IOlal dust conlaining no asbeslos and < 1% crystalline silica.

17719-12-21 (1982)

....... 0.2 1.1 0.5 2.8 ; Capilal lellels A& [J reler 10 Appendices; Cdenoles ceiling Iimi! Phthalic anhydride 

# I() Adopted values encrosed are on the Nolice 01 Inlended Changes lis! Consull il 

## i! lor currenI proposal for change. 185-44-9) (1987)

..... 1 6.1 

# I; I'" Idenlifies substances for which there are also BEls (see BEl seclion). Substances m-Phlhalodinitrile identified in (he BEl documenlations lor melhemoglobin inducers (fol which 

# I;

(626-17-5) (1977)

......... 5
­ methemoglobin is the principle loxicity) and organophosphorus cholineslerase tPicloram (1918-02-11

....... - 10

- (20) 

### i inhibilors are part of this nolalion. tPicric acid 188·89·11- Skin. 

### - 0.1

- (0.3) I' Subslance idenlilied by olher sources as a suspecled or conlilmed human car· 

## • I: Pindone 183-26-11 (1987)

.... - 0.1


### - cinogen. See the compliation in Ihe Appendix 10 Ihe Uocumenlation of TlVs, pp. Piperazine dihydrochloride A·5(86)-A·9(86).

1142-6431 (19821

......... - 5

- - 

# . Substance for which OSHA and/or NIOSH has aPermissible Exposure limit (PEl) or a Recommended Exposure lImil (REl) lower Ihan the TlV. 2-Pivalyl-l,3-indandione, 

### see Pindone t See Nolice of Inlellded Changes. 34 

# I 35



## (

# Hf}p~ • '- j ....:...-

__.L-

_ I**,~.** 

## J

# 9 

# c 

# LI I

_<"000" llllCllCll7 ,..,..,.-.'**~::~** f



## ::J**~-.** 

## . /I I 

# --AA--­

/ I '



# / ;' / / -f- C ('1 I '

/'I 

### ./J.c-( i ---, 

### i

I 

### 4.2.4-530

# MEMORANDUM

Hill Air Force file, Engineering Section, DAQ FROM: Nando Heli Jr., Environmental Health Engineer
SUBJECT: Justification for the use of an existing 400 hp boiler in building 1904. DATE: January 15, 1992
Hill Air Force Base submitted some information dated January 8, 1992 to substantiate their claim for using an existing 400 hp boiler. In building 1904 they are replacing a 150 hp boiler with an existing boiler and burner. The letter provides some information as to the cost effectiveness of using the existing burner and not a low NOx burner. Carl Broadhead talked to a manufacturer representative and came up with the following information: Cost of low NOx burner S45,000.00 Cost for installation and chamber mOdificataion 25,000.00 Total cost 70,000.00 Using Hill A.F. Base information to get a cost analysis for the amount per year for NOx reduction: Annualized capital cost assuming 20 year life at 8% rate = S70,000.00 x capital recovery factor =

70,000.00 x 0.1019 = 

## s 7,133.00Iyear for 20 years NOx emissions with existing burner = 3.68 tons/yr NOx emissions with low NOx burner 

### = 1.67 tons Iyr NOx reduction 

## = 2.01 tons/yr
S/ton of NOx reduction = S 7,133.00/year 2.01 tons/year S3556.00/ton It would not be cost effective to require the use of a low NOx burner in building 1904. Therefore, the Engineering section recomends that the existing boiler be used without a low NOx burner.

================================================;=============================



### 4.2.4-531, '_,--
-**A<\~'** i**,~** "T"\,,-, \J[,-...!J-C_i_:

---**(,~'\** ...// '(J"T"'{'-, ;,

,**~~C'f.' ''>-~''~'**  -.v> ) DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE \, HEADQUARTERS OGDEN AIR LOGISTICS CENTER (AFLC) HILL AIR FORCE BASE. UTAH 84056-5990 

## JAN 

# 0 9 1992 fN't

"0

..-,1:', ,-­


### 8 January 1992 Mr F. Burnell Cordner, Executive Secretary Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality 1950 West North Temple Salt Lake City UT 84114-4820 Re: Our NOI, 24 Apr 91, with Supplement, 30 Jul 91 Boilers-Bldgs 2203, 1624, 2104, 1904; Paint Booth-Bldg 752; Carbon Brake-Bldg 507; Emergency Generators-Bldgs 1212, 1213; Additional Info: BACT Boiler-Bldg 1904 Dear Mr Cordner Per telephone request from your staff member Mr Nando Meli, we have provided the BACT and cast/benefit analysis for retrofitting the proposed old boiler in Bldg 19@4 with a new low NOX burner as follows: Bldg 19@4 currently has two boilers which are grandfathered. These are 250 and 400 HP respectively. In the event that the 400 HP boiler goes down, it will be necessary for us to fire the proposed 400 HP boiler to meet the area"s steam demand. This existing boiler has a 1974 manufacturing date. This boiler was operated in Bldg 1132 for a period of 6-8 years and, since then, has been in storage near Bldg**2~25** 

### for the last 8-10 years. Since the boiler is so very old, we do not know the combustion chamber modifications that may be required before the boiler can be**~et~ofitted** 

### with a new low NOX burner technology. Based on a quotation**f~om** 

### Burner Energy Systems, Placentia, CA, approximate cost of a new low-NOX combination burner 

# = $45,000 installation costs 

# = $20,000 Estimated cost of combustion chamber modifications 

# = $50,000 Total capital cost 

# =**$115,@~0** 

### Annualized capital cost assuming 20-year life at 87. rate 

# = = $115,000 x capital**recove~y facto~**  

# = $115,000 x 

### 0.1019
= $ 

### 11,718 Estimated annual maintenance cost**fo~** 

### the new**bu~ner** 

### and controls, say $ 5,000/yr 

### Total annual cost 

# = $ 

### 16,718 NOX emiSSIons with the existing burner 

# -" (our supplement,**3~** 

### Jul 91) 

# = 3.68 tons/yr gas firing 

# = 5.26**tons/y~** 

### oil firing 

### 4.2.4-532 

# liP=-==- COMBAT STRENGTH THROUGH LOGISTICS

# -

NOX emissions with new low-NOX burner 

## = 38 ppm - new boiler ppm - retrofit boiler From Burner and Energy systems graph, using 40 ppm @ 37.**O~** 

### or IS-I. excess = 

### 0.5 lb**NOX/l~** 

### BTU Total heat input 

# = 16.74 mm BTU/hr Hours of operation 

# = 4,000 hrs.yr NOX emissions 

# = 0.05 lb NOX x 16.74 MM BTU x 4,008 hrs x ton 11M BTU hr yr 2,000 lbs


# = 1.674 ton NOX/yr NOX reduction 

# = 3.68

- 1.674 

# = 2.0 tons/yr Slton 

### pollutant 

# = S16,718 

# = S8,359/ton pollutant 2 

### Based on the above analysis, it will cost approximately S8,300 

### to abate a ton of NOX. The proposed boiler is almost 18 years old. Based on this analysis, and bearing in mind the age of the boiler, we request a determination whether or not we need to retrofit this boiler with a new low-NOX burner. Please note that if the current burner becomes inoperable, we 

### will replace it with a new low-NOX burner. We request expeditious review of 

### this NOI. If you need additional information, please feel free to contact Jay Gupta at 777-4618.

# ;=~-4**.-/~N** S. HILL 

### Ch, Environmental Compliance Div Environmental Management Directorate

,.,-" 

### 4.2.4-533

### 20:31 NO.057

- P001/002



## FAX 

# j:ot(

­ I

. i : 

# /

. uj)tJ ).f 

## £ '- / I ! 

### cF 

# (1,Jt,Y­ 'Mr F. 

### Burnell Cordner, Executive Secretary

. 'i ,.-,

### S/~M n 

### {b,t7V1**RJ~~** 

### Dept. of Environmental Quality**~~.** y 

### r: 

### Pivision of Air Quality 

## aJk.

.

# NExt 11950 W. North Temple

# ~,Y**~~/'f'A** 

# ';'sfll ISLC, UT 84114·4820 

## I /1tu: AFIJ. 

### Re: Our NOI 24 Apr 91 with Supplement 30 Jul 91 I 

### Boilers Bldgs. 2203,1624,2104,1904, Paint Booth

# Bld~7S1, Carbon Brake Bldg 507, Emergency Generators Bldgs 1212,1213 

## I I 

### Additional Information: BACT Boiler, Bldg 1904
pear Mr Cordner: Per telephone request from your staff member 

## Mr Nand Meli, we provide the BACT and cost/benefit analysis for retrofitt 

## ng the prpposed old boiler in Bldg 1904 with a new low NOx burner, as 

### f 

## 110ft'S: I I 

### Bldg 1904 currently has two boilers which are grandfat ered. Th./;se are 

### 250 and 

## 400HP respectively. 

## Tn the event that 

## 400HP b ·ler goes own, 

## it will be necessary for us to fire the proposed 400HP boil r to mee: the area's 

## Sleam demand. i I 

## This existing boiler 

## has 1974 manufacturing date. 

## This oiler was I 

### operated in Bldg 1132 for 

## a period of 

## 6·8 years 'and, sin 

## e then, hllS 

## been 

## in storage near Bldg 2025 for r.he last 8-10 years. Since e boiler 

# is 50



### ....ery old, we do not know the combustion chamber mod 

## fieltions that may be required before the boiler can be retrofitted with 

## a ne 

## low NOx burner technology. ' eased on 

## a quetation from Burner & 

### Energy Systems, PI

## C~ Approx cost of a new low 

## NOx combination burner ;;:$4 

## ,000. I 

### JnstalJation cost 

## =$2 .000. Estimated cost of combustion chamber modifications=$5 

## ,000. Total capital cost ::::$1 

## S,CDO. Annualized capital cost assurr:ing 20 year life & 

### 8% rate, 

## =$1 15,OOO.XCapital Recovery Fac or i I 

### =S115,OOO.XO.I019 =$11,718. 4.2.4-53411/02/08 20:31 NO. 057

- P002/002 ! I



## : i I 

## d contrc)ls. say S5.000./Yr ;Total annual cost 

## =$1 .718. Estimated annual maintenance cost for the new burner

I 

## NOx emissions with the eXIsting burner (our supplement 

## 30 luI 91) ;:;;3.68 Tons/yr Gas 

## fuing 

## =5.26 Tons/yr Oil firing Note: Oil firing serves only as a back-up. ! 

## NOx emissions with new low NOx burner 30PPM-New**~oiler** 

## 4OPPM-Retroflt boiler 

## From Burner & Energy Systems graph, 

## I I 

## 40PPM at 3% 02 or 15% excess air =0.05 Lb 

## NOx/MM B Total heat input =16.74 

## MM Btu

·Hours of operation ;;4.000 

## Hrs/yr NOx emissions = 

## .05 Lb NOxlMM 

## Btu 

## X 16.74 

## MM Btu r X 4.0001 

## Hrs/yr X Ton/2.000 Lbs

1.674 Ton/yr NOx reduction ;:;; 3.68-1.674=2.0 Ton/yr S/Ton 

## pollutant = S16.718./2:;$8.359./Ton pollutant

:Based on the above analysis. it will cost approximately 

## 8300. to**~bate** 

## a ton of NOx. The 

## proposed boiler is almost 18 

## years old. 

# ased on 

# this analysis and bearing in mind the age of the boiler. we equest a i 

## determination whether or not we need to retrofit this b Her 

## with I

### a 

## new low NOx burner. Please note that if 

## the existing burner !becomes inoperational. we will replace it with a 

## new low NOx**b~rner.** 

### We**~request** 

## an expeditious review of this NOI. 

# i !f 

## you have any questions. please feel free to contact 

## 1a Gupta at 

## 777­ :4618.

:Sincerely


## IBob Van Orman

.Director, Environmental Management

4.2.4-535

I i I**~~£** 

### 2 

### OF 

### Z.

# -------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------



# ---------------------------------------------------- I /P-t'£-?'/ /t'IUkiZ fi.7ec.E 

# bJJ:E; v;:;:**Th~R~** 

### IS·NO**!NV~2SION A~OSPH~qIC-STA?-:~:7Y'?ARA~~E2**  

## :s %F-;:**A/O~** 

### Zy**/4~** 

### '7'1 

# - , . 

# .
-


### SPILL SITE**~OU~~N~SS LENGT~** **~~** 

### 50 

### THIS IS A 

### GAS**REL~AS~'** 

### HC'!GHT OF LEAK ABOVE: GROUl\:l)**l.~** 

### 6 M -EMISS.ION·RATE 

### IS 'w 

### 01' KG/MrN CHEMICAL**~s** 

### STILL LEAKH!S .­**CO~C:NTRATIQN AV~RAGING** **T~~E** IS 15 

### MIN 7C _"**ELAPS~D TrM~** **S~~C~** START
,_

## ...." 

## HErSHT ABOVE "GRDUND IS 0**DO~NW~~~** 

### DISTANC2 

## rs 150**~Ru3S~!I\rz) DrSTA~-lC~**  :::5 

### o·r·;
:.1t::.


# ......
e:-' -, . STAF:T**,,-~.:..:.....:...-** IS 

### MIN**H2IG~:** 

### OF INTEREST IS 0 M


### 90% PROB HAZARD D!ST 

# = 1B2**~~D ~IDTH** **:8~ :::.=-~,**  I: THE MA 

### !:'1ur--r**DISTANC~** 

### FOR wOl , : 

### :8 87**DIS7A~C~ ~OR**  

### .02 THE rfAX I MUM**-~-------------------------- ELA~SED**  

### T!M=**SZN~~** 

### START.OF**SPI~~** 

## :s 60**~~N** .- H·E-r:;PT- '0'1:":' IN-ER-S-

..

# s 0 M- .'

.. - .' .::. .• .J. 00;1.

. '.**~_:.** t**~t:.** I

.... ..:..
...._.. ':- J. .'.--:-. .•

. . 

### .. ' 

### ....... . ..

# -
.... , ... 

### -- .'-':" .......

.**90%·PROB·:~~ZARD** DIS'·.= -iS2 M**··:::-iAL..~;-·.DTR--·** AND**WTDTH:~** lSG:":- 75**D~13** :':" '.' '.'**~:-** .**~-** & ••
.. .. - • .-: .

..**TciE.~.AXTMUM ~:STANC=:**  FOR. 01 ;:'PM 

# is 87 i'l 

## _·:tHE!"1AXIMUM nISTANC:=: FOR

_03 P?M 

### IS**'~8** 1"1

....;**05'~PPM** 

### '-IS TGG HIG:-i

. . . ,'

......

....

.... . ,;., '<:. -

### .. ,**.~.-:** 

# -­
.... :',:,:--.• .:.-:.:.. ':. ... .'.-.'

.. 

# ..-.
.. 

### 4.2.4-536

# -------------------------------------------------- {-



## Hil: A:=B**D~TE:** 

### 10-11-1991 TIME: !.2:00·LST**CONT~NUOUS** 

### RELEASE CHEMICAL 

# = Phosphoric Qxides .MOLECULAA l,IJElGHT -. 63

..**TEMP£~TURE:''';'** 22 C**~,-. WI~JD**  

### .. DIRECTION 

### = 0 !.A,!IND S?t:ED·

# =- 3 l"i/S SUflkE.L.E.VATI ON: ANGLE IS 42**~ESRE~S**

### CL;.DLii:f::.cciv..ER:~::tS**~2·** 

## .. EIGHTI-iS

· CLOUD**TYP~~.!S** 

### 'MIDDU; (Ac,**A~~** 

### Be.



### GRCUNDIS'DRY

... ,THERE:.IS**:;:NO~~** NVERS 

## m.t

..**P;rMOSPHERiC'~STAB.Ir..:.!TY·** PAF-:AMETER IS



### S?ILL··siTE··.RCLISHNESS

### LENGI~**.!.~** 1(:

. .:. .:..•.;.. .. '.. 

### ;**~-~** ,.. 

### TtiI SI S

..

### A

..GAS· RELEASE 

### HE!SHT 

## OF:LEAK**~OVES20~ND** 

### IS 6 M EM1.S--0NRAIE 

## -So Q' 

### ---1M-hi 

# ·**::u~** 

# ...°ICl.·A·L·

### ;::"I:S":ST:~t I"

### ~.,**~A'·K:\.~"~ ,;,.~** **~'.~** ..... ', ...• 1-_**.~_** ..Lt"(t=

_**CDNCENTRATrON·AVS::~AGING** '7IME 

### :S ::'5**M~"~** .SL4PSED·

..TIME:.SINCE.START OF S:=·ILI.... :S 240

### ;.;~~~ 

## "HE-i:'G8T:: ABoVEGRQUND IS

_

### (~ M



# . ..**·D9>~·~. N[).:::.D"i$TAN~E;:·~**  8.:.1.50' M 

## .>, .. CROSSWIND.:.::DISTA,,'\CCE.·...IS

.. ¢M

.


# .**:.:~ '~'.'~::'.**  

# .' '.**..::.~;..;.;;.-=--~.:-** 

# __ .-.-----.**-----~:....~-------_..:..._--** . - .. ' : ,;7

.. :01'. ··TWC···CONC·-=-'N·T·.R'A'-l T·'"'N·:··TS· '··0')5**~!:::'.~** . ·'-'1 :"''""" .M';") ·**_".:.~.-:-:'-** :. _. _w _ 1., ."_'

__ .lw It .J



# __ ..

# --
- . 

### - . - . '- 

# ---------------------------------------­

· =:LAPSED TIME S:::NC::>STP:RT C:= S?::-L.. :::S 250 M:i';**~EIGH!._OF._":INTER=.ST_**.. 

### IS (;. 

### r: 4.2.4-537

. . .

.. . .. .

### ~90~.:::_~~~_.H8?~~<D. !JIST 

# = 275.

.,'**.~.H~Z~RD** DIR

.. ;**:(~ND** WIDTi-i 180 .r. - 75 DEG



### .**:0Er·~A;::IML;:** 

### ..

### :1·D:S7ANCE ;:':JE=: r',· ??:-:i 

### IS**~~. ;-~**  :
..**~.:.:.:·**..**;·~THE·~.MA~r-t~UM.·:.:D-!STANCE :-:-;~-~**  •**~;~** PP:"i. IS**.=.~** l..t

# ~,:·~~Di~:~:i?;~:·~:~~J::.·.~~~:;T~9·~.I.G) 

### -

.-
, _.' 

# "
, )

,



## ,

\**:.--~.'-:'':':-'''-;** :"

.... --:-**.~.** -... ;.

:- ';

.... .. ' . ..:... .. .. 

# -..

. 

### -..**~:.'.** ; .. " -.-**~:,:,,~** .. :,",.-:.- ..**~.:::.::~** .

.- .



### 4.2.4-538

### DET1'-!!.ED DOCUMENTATION 

# F;.e.s'"**~tI,/Jt.E** of**,;J~&S P£)~I?/IJIA/4**  -:"'#£ AdPEL..

### tlJ~-' 

## P? A:f;v/!E Ir)/Pv .IJ&"£P

### ~PU'"?"; Purpose: AFTOX**~il1** 

### deter.mine toxic chemical, concentrations and give 

### the user the 

### option of calculating a toxic**cor=~dor,** 

### the**concen~ratio~** 

### at a specific location r 

### or the 

### maximum'concentration**~~d** 

### its**locat~on.** 

### 2., P.;>plicatioD: AFTOX

.....

### as devel.oped for real time analysis of 

### toxic 

### chemical**releas~s.usage** 

### of.AFTOX 

### is governed by APR 355-1, AWS Supplement' 

### 1. It is**writt~** 

### so that ]l}iiS 

### base weather station.s' Ca.!l 

## apply**AFT9X,,~0** 

### continuous or 

### instantaneous, gas or, 

## liquid releases from either, ground or elevated. 

### sources. It 

### can also be applied 

### to hea.ted 

### plumes from 

### smokestacks. .?-.FTOX 

### ,contains seventy-six chemicals on 

### file and has 

### the 

### capability to 

### add othQr chem.ical.s.

. 3. Structure: A 

### detailed 

### explanation of AFTOX 

### is contained in 

### 1>..FGL-TR

### 88-0009. 'AFTOX 

### is 

## comoosed of 

### several files which are linked' together. 

### The program- files 

### are DSP1.EXE,

- DSP2 .EXE, 

### DSP.HP .EXE, 

### a.."1d DSP3.EXE. The file**structur~** 

### is as follows; a. DSPl: This file**dete~;nes** 

### the chemical nrooerties and meteoroloaical conditions. 

### Schematic representation- is- 

### shown in Figure 1.

­ Figure 1. DS?l 

### Flow 

### Diagram <Station Data> I <nate and. Ti.!ne> 

### I 

### <Type of Release>**----buo~-ant** 

### plt;me I I ,instantaneous or continuous 

### I I 

### I 

### <Chemical Data> I 

### I I CALCUT--r.i"_TE 

### I 

### Solar J>.ngle. 

# ----------- [

, 

### I <Temperature, Wind, 

### Cloud Amount> l [ 

### I Dl>.Y 

### NIGET 

### <Cloud Type> I ! 

### I 

### I**CbLCU~;TE** 

### I I 

### lSolar Insolation

### I 

### I ! I 

### snow cover? 

## -----yes---------l I I 

### I ( no 

### [ I I 

### ! 

### I <Ground**Mois~ure>** 

# ------------->\<--------------------1 I (**CALCU~_TE** 

### [ 

### IReat Flux I 

### I <Inversion 

### Height> 

### 4.2.4-539

### I CALCULA.TE I 

### IFrictionVelocitv, lO-m Wind Speed I I 

### Monm-Obukhov Length 1 

### I .' 

## 1 CALCULATE 

### ! 

### {Stability Parameter\ ------buoyant 

### plume I I 

### <Roughness Length 

### at: 

### Spill Site> EXIT 

## I to DSPEP 1 CllCULATE 

### I 

### ,Properties of Air I 

### I 

### chemical properties on file? -------------no { I yes ----- gas --------->\ 

### I I 

### liquid I [ [ 

## I CALCULATE 

### I r 

### IChemical Properties 

## I ----->EXIT to 

### DSP2 Major 

### computations of DSPl are described as 

### follows: (1). 

### Solar elevation**~gle:** 

### DeteDnined 

### using date,**t~~e, la~itude**  

### and longitude. (2). 

### Sensible heat flux: 

### DeteLmined bv 

### one of**t~o** 

### methods,**depend~it** 

### on daytime or nighttime conditions. (a). Day: 

### Cloud**~~ount,** 

### tempe=ature,**~o~~d** 

### state, 

### and solar in

### solation (from solar 

### angle, cloud 'amount 

### and 

### cloud type)

. used

.. 

### (b) •. 

### Night: 

# Cloud amount 

### only is 

### used. (3).**·Turbu~ence** 

### parameters: Friction velocity, IO-meter 

### wind speed, 

## and Monin-obukhov length. axe interre.lated 

### and a:ce 

### de.tenn.ined iteratively from. initial estimates based 

### on the 

### wind speed, heat**f~ux,** 

### surface pressure, and surface roughness. (4). 

### Stability**pa~~eter:** 

### One 

# 0= two methods 

### of computation are 

### used. (a). 

### Method

.. 1:·**:Tn.r:bulenc~** 

### pa.rameters 

### de.sc=ibed in (3)

_ above are



### .used.

.. - .. - . (b) •. 

### Method. 

## 2: -Standard. deviation 

### of the,winddireetion and**~-nd** 

### speed':at 10 m :are. 

### used. (5). '.Air**propert~es:** 

### 'Density and viscosity.are**compute~** 

### from tempel:"2..ture and 

### pressure. . (6). 

### Chem:ical'-orone-rties: 

### For a liouid. 

### chemical wh.:ich is. in.

### the data fi.le,

### the~vaPor:pressure,**~iquid** .dellsi.ty, 

### .and 

### vapor-. density 'are



### .,. ··.computed::from the:.chemical data, 

### the air· tem?erature,.

.

### and·' pressure., _ . 

### b. DSP2 : .. 

### This. fi1.e.:dete:on.i.nes 

### the 

### source ·conditions.**(e~g.,·** 

### emission 

### rate· duration of.:spi.ll, area.:of 

### spill,: 

### and source:**strength).~:·;:** 

### .:-.. processinqthrough.;:nSP2:·is':dependent.:·OIl

.. type' 

### of;re1.ease.·:. The:··

.. :.**air,temperature:is~compared.:to** 

### the**chem:ical~s** 

### boil.i.J::l.g·. point to deteI:mine.if,it: is 'a-caseous 

### or l.·icruid'soill. 

### If the chemi.c·aY 

### of

.interest is

..**noton~file.,':de.fault** 

### settings may be used L.. 

### or user.may i.nput 

### molecular we"Tght,

- 

### vapor pressure, and whether**re~ease** 

### is_ a**~iqu.id** 

### or gas to 

### determine source. 

### strength.· Schematic**~epresentation** 

### of qSP2 

### is. sho

.... 

### -n·in Figure 2.**F~~ure** 

### 2. DSp2 

### Flow Diagram

. 4.2.4-540 DSEl

·1

.

### I I GAS 

### I,IQUID 

### I I <Height of 

### Leak> 

### I 

## . I \


# , I [ 

### continuous instanta..'"leous continuous 

### instantaneous 

### I I t 

### <Emission 

### Rate> O..mount**Spi~led>** 

### v......mission Rate> 

### <.Amount Spilled> 

### I 1 

### i <Spill Duration> 

### I C1i...LCUT

.......

:zi.TE 

### I <Spill Duration> 

### ! 

## ! Area I 

### I I Q...LOJI.}.TE I 

### I lCALCULATEl 

### I J..mount 

### I I CALCULATE 

### I [ .A..'11.ount! 

### I Spilled 

### I I Source j 

### I Spilled t 

## I I Strength! 

### I \ 

### I ,**CALCUL..~TE** 1 

### 1 

### I I 1'..rea 

### I 

## I I 

### I I ! reasonable? 

### ---no--> <Area> 

### I I I 

### I yes CALCUT·A.'l'E 

### I

, -....

__ ....... ..:

__ . r**'t:"'.....-~** I 1 I , l

.........**-~** ..... -...-._-"-

.. a I 

### 1 

### ! R2.::.e 

### I [ 

### I 1 

### I I CALCULAT=: 

### I 

## I I 

### I Evaporation 

### I I .! I Time 

### I 

### I [ J 

### I [---------------->1-------->1<------1<-------------------1 

### I EXIT to DSP3 (1)

_ COntinuous 

### gas release: Uses the emission rate and the 

### total**t~e** 

### of the spill 

### to compute**~he** 

### total amount 

### spilled. The 

### emission rate is the source 

### strength.·· (2)• Instantaneous 

### gas release: Uses the amount 

### spilled and air 

### densitv to 

### determine the initial**vol~e** 

### of the snill. (3). 

### Continuous liquid 

### release: The evaporation 

### rate- 

### into the 

### atmosphere is the 

### source strength. If the 

### area of tae spill is 

### knorm, 

## it is used 

### to dete=mi.n.e the evanoration rate. If the 

### area is· unknown, 

### then the evaporation 

### rate is -set 

### eaual t.o the emission rate· 

### and an area is 

### calculated. If**~is c~lculated**  

### area appears unreasonably large, 

### then 

### user may**~~put** 

### a smaller area 

### which will. give a new evaporation 

### rate. An alternate 

### method exist for chemicals rd.th.out 

### full data·information. Evaporation rate**is~·** 

### determi.!1ed.using

..

### spill. area, pool temperature, 

### chemica.l 

### molec.ular weight

.. and vapor pressure.: If V2.riables are unknown, the "model assumes 

### the worst case 

### and the evapora-.::ion :::::ate is set**equa~** 

### to the emission rate. 

### (4).**~stantaneous ~iquid**  

### release: Uses the amount**spil~ed,** 

### area covered,. 

### chemical and air**nrooer-~es** 

### to 

### comoute the 

### evanoration rate. 

### Tbe evaporat.ion· rate 

# i; set equal**to~** 

### the sou.::ce ;trength. 

### The amount**spil~ed** 

### and the evaporation 

### rate deter.m£ne the total evaporation time •.. 

### The alternate method listed in 

### (3) above 

### is 

### used if**ch~cal** 

### data is not 

### available. c. 

### DSPRP:This file determines the 

### source,conditiocs for a buoyant from a stack (e.g., emission rate,**du-~tion** 

### of· spill,**heigh~** 

### of spill) _. 

### Source strength is set equal 

### tome emission rate. As 

### 4.2.4-541 t? "',- 

### L /IF 

### f

### . '

..

# :.~: shown in

.. 

### Figu:=e 3, a.tmospher:"c conditions

# d.ete~e p:=ocessing 

# ;/ -

.



### _ - .... through· the

.**modu~e** •. vi.gure**3~** DSPHP 

### Flow Diagram 

# ­ DSP1. 

### I <Molecular Weight> 

### I <Emission Rate> I 

### effluent still 

### being emitted?-----------no 

### I I yes <.Elapsed time r 

### of emissioD> 

### I I <Sta.ck 

### Eeight>----------<----------­ I Stack height above**~version?-----------yes** 

### I 

### no 1 END

.--"**_~** .. __ .L...

.... """

..**-~.:-** 

## -- "..:;." 1 

### 1 

### I**C~..LCtJh.~TE** 

### I 

### IBuoyancy Fluxl I 

## I DNSTABLEATMOSPEERE 

### I I CALCOLA'I'E 

### (Equilibrium 

### I Distance -I 

### I CALCULATE 

### I Eauilibriurn I 

### Height 

### I 

## t I 

## 1<-----------1 Eeightl

(1.) • 

### If stack height is 

### above the**i~version,** 

### then**progr~** 

### terminates 

### since surface input 

### meteorological conditions most likely 

### do not apply above the inversion. 4.2.4-542**~A-f,f** 

## -7

## LJrtf'

### . /



### /. (ll 

# ..;':eu';'yatl:'" allY-':

# I~ is

# de~e=io.<>d usio.g

# ~!l<> ah"temperatur<>, 

### s-as

... ..;**:~.** 

### : stack

....empera....**ure~** 

### volume flow rate, and g=avitational 

### ::.: _::**acca~eration.** 

### (3)

.. Unstable 

### or· neutral 

### conditions: T!le buoyancy flux is used 

### to

. :··:computa .tile 

### distance downst=eam**vrn.~rQ** 

### the ecrui:li.briu.m heigb.t is 

### reached. This distance, the buoyancy 

### flux, -and**wi~d** 

### speed 

### determine 

### the equilibrium. height_ 

### (4)

. Stable 

### conditions; The 

### buoyancy flux, wind speed, 

### and potential temperature 

### lapse rate 

### (based on 

### the degree of stability) 

### are used 

### to compute 

### the**equi~ibri.um** 

### height.**DOWDwi..:.~d** 

### dist2.!2ce where**equ~librium** 

### height 

### occurs is 

### not needed. 

### (5). Effective 

### plu..-rne height: This is 

### equal to the. suru of 

### the equilibrium height 

### c.Ild st:ack 

### height above 

### ground. Model assumes gas is 

### released at the effective height 

### for dispersion calCUlations. 

### If the effective height is 

### above the 

### inversion height, it: is 

### set equal to the**in~ersio~** 

### height. This is a conservative 

### approach-for calculating g=ound concentrations. d. DSP3: 

### This file 

### computes the hazard area (determined by 

### concentration), 

### concentration at a given location and 

### time, or maximum**conce~­** 

### tration and location, and outputs the results. The**t}~e** 

### of output**dete~nes** 

### the processing through the file, as**sho~u** 

### in 

### tae flow diagram of Figure 4. 

### 'i.g-ure 4. 

### DS?3 Flow 

### Diagram DSP2 

### or DSPli.? 

### I**l-<---------------------I-----------------~->-l** 

### I I I 1?TION 1**OPTIO~** 

### 2 OPTION 

### 3 ,.,....--.. 

### oured plot) 

### {conce..'1.tration at (max**conc~t=ation)** 

### I**~i~~dt~e)** 

### I 

### <Concentration 

### I .<Elevation> 

### .. of Interest> 

### <Elevation>·1 

### I I I <EleVGtion> 

### <Downwind Distance> I 

### [

. I·

.. - [ output plot <Crosswind 

### Distance> r 

### ;.ckground on scree..Tl [ 

### I 

### I I -I 

# 1---->1---------------------->1<--------------------1<-1 j 

### I I [ I. CALCULATE 

### I [ 

## 1 I Dispersion t . 

### ! 

### 1 I

### Coefficients I no 

### \ ·1:- and 

### I I 

### I I Concentration [ 

### I ! [ 

### ----------:-:-:--1 I 1----.------,------> maxiinum.? 

### I I I . I ! 

### equals contour 

### I I o<---concentrat.ion'? 

### I 

### yes I ! 

### I yes 

### I ] 

### I I I lot 

### concentration 

### I I I - 1 I -plot**comp~ete?** 

### I 

### ! I I I 4.2.4-543 ye& 

### I !



### I : It

# / FAX FO/(

.. IIANPO 

## Ne-Li PRDM ; 7A 

## 'I**t:tlt'7'~"** 

### HAFt! 

# -,

Rill 

### Fir Force Base-Utah RECEIVEU 

### Nando 

### Meli 

# OCT 01,7991 Div of Air Quality 

### 1950 W North 

### Temple AIR OJIAl ITy 

### SLC UT 84114 Ref: 

### Additional Infonnation on 

### our NO! 

### dated 24 Apr 

### 91 and 

### supplement transmitted 30 Jul 91, 

### Boile:!:'s Bldgs 2203,1624,2104,1904 and**Ca~bon** 

### Brake Coating 

### Bldg 507. 

### Pe:!:' our telecon of 27 Sept, we 

### provide additional 

### ;nformation as follows: We will**~evise** 

### boilers 

### purchase requisitions to 

### require low**NO~** 

### burners with**NO~ ~ating**  

### of 40 ppm 

### or less.**Excep~ion** 

### to this 

### is an old existing 

### boiler for bldg 1904. We 

### are not 

### replacing the burner 

### for this boiler. MSDS for the Bendix P-j1**coa~~~q** 

### is enclosed. This**coa~ing** 

### contains 

### phosphoric acid**~~d mono-alw~i~UD**  

### phosphate as**oyidan~s.** 

### the exact composition is not available**ci~e** 

### to**proprieta~** 

### reasons. The coating**ov~~** 

### temperature is 900 degrees C, 

### the exhaust pipe is 

### 1 inch 

### ;n diameter and point of 

### discharge will 

### be app=oximately 

### 20 feet**abo~e** 

### grade. At 900 degrees C r 

### the cischarge volume will 

### be about 

### 20 acfm • 

### The hours of operation for the coating process 

### will be 2000 hrs/yr 

### nominal and 4000 hrs/yr rn.a:-:imum. Based on this, 

### max;!nu:n POx emission =ate will 

### be as follows: 250(gal)x8.33xl.5(S**Gr)x.85(Evap)x45~xl!200?xl/3600=O_157** 

### Gm/Sec Nominal POX 

### emission rate will be 0.0835 8m/Sec. 

### Jay**GU~**

# EJ:Ir~n Engr

4.2.4-544

## ....... ALL!ED-SIGNAL**AE~QSPACE** 

### COMPANY A L!N1T OF ALlU::D-SIGN.:il INC_**BEN~rX ~HEELS** **~ND** 

### BRAKES**OIVISrO~ ~ATERrAL** **5~FETY D~TA**  

### 5kEEr
The**f':lllc~lir.g** cat:l.**~~."** be I..:.SCU to**c::::,:~ly** \-lith OSHA'::;**H=::i1('t~ Co.n~t;:'1ic~tio:"'l** **St'::!1~_~:·M** .::Jr"]. 

### rFn i9l-:>.120C. 7:-;,"-:**~tcl~;;l.Jr;::** ;;;,,-;0"';. IU_'looil-:·

....t.:r
.. 

### l:e '-[."\I',:".u1**te~ ~l­** **-~;::::e~iric:** 

### l""equirements. ,;11 

### of**~t'e** 

### p.2r 

### tic:ula.te i: 1

### g r ediet"1.l:s 

### in**Carbc~** Disk E:-ak!:? f1"" i:::: 

### tier,**r::\=tel·i~l ~1"'oc~'.:l;s** **~f"e** siiitef'"ecJ**tCJ:;~ther** to 

### forrn 03. 

### solid 

### m.at.:rLa.!.**Hc::~r::~ ;-:~H":':'1.i!.l·**  aSS;lC**i:~t~c,j** 

### o-li th**Exp~s~re** to or CC:'1t.;c'= 

### with**;::~r~ :.i~st:::.**  c::rf ·the 

### I**~~':S:::1** .**it'lqrC?ci~r1t~** 

### ere not 

### expec:tC'c 

### t:::: be**~iCJnif.ic.c::.nt_** 

### _ All i.ed-Siyn.ai hdS 

### 1. 

### ist.t·' .=.11 of the**es::enti~l** 

### ingre.·dien":s p!"l:sent in a. series of**prec-.:~t.s** cf't!lis 

### qeneral**c~sc.ription_** 

### The**r2~ommended expe~U~G** **!i~its·ar~ t~ose** **f~r- ~~~**  

### most**haz~rdO~S su~z~ance**  

### in a**c.la~s** 

### of sl..:.bstanc.es.**Ex~~~ 70r~ul~t~~ns** **~l ~rc~rieta.y**  

### and**ther~fcre** 

### confidential. 

### Precise**p~cc~ct in~er~~ti~~** **~ilt** 

### not bli'**di!!c.1C5.~d,** 

### otr>.er t1i.an 

### in ac.ccrd.::

..c.e 

### witl"1**a.p~li:=':'ble l..~.ws**  •**.l'""z~** 

### rc-g:.(­**latio~s,** 

### or**wit~out** 

### a**~ritte~** 

### Sec.e:=y**~~ee~ent_ ~11~e0-S~gnal**  

### shall in no :vent be re$pcnsible fer 

### any**d~~~~~s** 

### cf**a.~i** !'"latI.Lr<: or**~ir.d** 

### olrac:"cly 0':"" 

### i...-:ci;-Ectly re'.>ultim;**frc~** 

### cr**u.~ising** Cl.,;:' :::f ti

.. '**~~bli~~tio~** 

### or uSg of**c~ ~~li~nce** **~~c~.data CCt~tai~2d** **~erei~_ ~·~rc** **~~i:~~~~** cr**i~plied** war-ra,:-1ty 

### 07**~:"':y ki~d,** **i~C:!t.,;dir:9** 

### wa.r:-c;nties cf**.~c:rch~~l\:** ..**iL:~I~='j1** : fit:":t:S5 fa.-**tJS~, ~ith** **~e'Spect** to**tt~e** F"r-ic"ticn**Ma:t2~ial ~r"'=-~!...:.::;'s** **C~** 

### to th·1**d~~a her~in**  

### is made**h~re~nde'.**



## -------------------------------------------------------------- -----_._­**Atlie~-Si9~al·Aerc5pace Comp3~Y**  

### Dete**Pl-e~~.£d: .:r':::'T1.~a.r**  --; -(, j 9:3::: 

### a unit of**Alli=d-Sign~l** 

### !nc_ ?'ED:areo By:**~_** L. t.!ce:C 

### Eendix**~he~ls** 

### a ..d**3rak~s** 

### Division**Adur~ss:** 

### P.O. Eox 10 South Bend,**Indian~** 

### 46624 

# ._------------------------------------- ---------_.--"

-- - 

### -- ...

## _----­ 

# . SECTION 

### II

-**Hez~rdo~s** 

### !ng':""ccients/!dentity**lnformati~n Oxid~tio~** **Pen~~r2~~ P/~** **7~'0~n~ r~_,,)**  

### Cammon NGr.\e<s)**~"'CGrH** 

### TLV**OS~A** PEL 

### PhOSphor-ic:: Ac:id**l~g/m=: Mono-~luminum-?hosph2te** **2~C;;** (AL)**/~-;:** 

### ,"' 

## """

....

- ic: Ac id NA 

### Poage 

### of 4


### 4.2.4-545

# ---

---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ................ 

## ... ..LV' V'" 1,-' :.:.",**(~~-.::,.** '

...**:.'~~~** \::..

### ...**~~ ~J** **~.**



### -. SSCTrCN tIl O.:J iIing Po i 

### n t : 1 CO':OC 

### Specific 

### Gravi.ty:
Vapor Pressure:(mm Hg_);:)2tY'C -0.028::: 

### Melting Pcslnt:**V~por D~nsity:<Air**  = 

### 1]**a2~oC** 

### - 1.964 Evaporation**R~t~:** 

# .,

### .... "I""t 

### (Butyl**Acet_~e** 

# = 1) Solubility in Water: - (**>100g/100~1** 

### )
Ap;::3'2arance cane Ocor: Transpare;1t (Oderless) liquid**-------------------------------------------------~------------ ----------.**  

### SECTION 

### tv

-**F~ra** 

### and**E~plosior'l** 

### Hazard 

### Data


### Flash Point (Method 

### Used): Not NA L =; • UEL:**fl2.mr::~:::le** 

### inguishing**~dia:** 

### Net flilc:r.:able
SpecL:ll Fire 

### f-ighting Proceol;res: 

### Use**SElf-centai~ed** 

### b1eathing**e~~~ratu~.** 

### Use 

### dry**chemical~** 

### Carbon**Dioxid~,** 

### or 

### foam fer 

### fighting lires.**tJn~:~u~l** 

### Fire 

### eno Exp los ior'l Hazards; Dcl.ngerous;**wh~n** h:2a 1:=:1 

### to**=.~-:=c;::::­** 

### pcsiticn, emits· toxic**~um~s** 

### of 

### POw.
SECTION V - Reactivity Data 

### Sta!:lility: Unst.able: 

### Conditions to 

### Avoid: know_



### .., Stable: 

### '" 

### Inccmpatibillty (Materials to Avoid):**Strc~g** 

### bases (Caustics) 

### H2..z2..

....**~·:::.~= necocr-pC'~**  

### it i 

### on or EyProduc:ts: nF.'r:nmpnses upon l"1:?d t i. 

### -:og**-:..~** 

### :**C~ :-I~**  

### toxic**and/o~** 

### corrosive gases or fl;mes of 

### POw 

### Poly;;;e:-ization: May Occur: Conditions to 

### will Not Occur: V A 

### 4.2.4-546 Pagl;' 2 of 4

# --------------- .- .....


# - 

# -'

SECTION**V~** 

### - Health**Ha~ard D~ta**  

### Route(s) oT**E~pcsu~e:** 

## r :'"1M

### a 1 

### a t: 

### ion? Yes Skin" 

### Yes**To~ic** 

### when heated to 

### above lOO?C.

Health**H~zards** 

### (Acute**~nd Chrcni~):** **Cor~osive** 

### to skin and**~yes. Cu~cinog~nici~y**  

### Listing: 

### NTF? NA 

## TARe**~cncg":"'ar.h;;?** NA**8~}** {;; Rftf,JtI cl**:'~cl·** NA**Msdic~l** 

### Conditions**Ge~erally As~rav~ted**  

### by**E~pcs~~e:** :":O.tH:-' Ct,:;:-:-'"(.:?!"1 

### t 1. y 

### known**c=ei;~ncy** 

### and F!rst Aid Proc:dures: If penetrant contacts 

### eyes,skl.n, clothes (rel71ovel, 

### fl:,,;s:l**::::.:::...ec~atEly** 

### with**lar~=** 

### amounts of cold water.**W~sh** 

### ey=s**fO~2 ~i~i~u~**  

### of IS**mi~­ u.tes~**  

### C.:1.11 a.**physicilI~.** 

### !-f 

### ingested,**i=:ledlatel~'** 

### cal t 

### a ph-ysicL-::.n.



### S2CTION VIr p'rec:::au

### t ions for 

### Safe Hanel i 

### ng**ar~d U~E'**  

### Steps 

### To Be**T~~en** 

### in CaSE Material 

### is**Re!~asE'ci** 

### cr**Spill~d:**
r - _.-J -. 'l**Ne~tralize** 

### spill with**scdiu~ b:c~.~c~ate**  

### - ...;. ...**~-~** .. 

## ­ material. 

### Uaste**Oi~posal M~thod:**  

### CautiouSly add to an excess of wdter.**{\dj~.t$t** pr: 

## ::0 neu**Lr~** 

### 1. Sep**arat~** 

### any inscluble solids 2nd 

### package -for'" waste disposal_ 

### 'cautions to 

### be**T~ken** 

### in Handling and Storing: 

### Store at rOom temperature away from strong**b~5es.** 

### 4,2.4-547 Page 3 of 4

## _ _ -... 

# .**~..** 

### '"

."--,, 

## MSDS NO. 400

.­ 

### Other Precautions: 

## Do not Wear contact 

## lenses; see cootrol 

## measures. SECTION VIII

-**Control·tleasu~es**


## Provide adequate general or local·ventilations to 

## keep vapors. 

## below P.E.L. for 

## phosphoric acid (1 Eg/m

## 3) and alumiouc (2 

## og/e3).**,-----~---** 

## Protective Gloves: Acid

- resistant**~ubber** 

## gloves.

- 

## Eye Protection: 

## Safety Glasses:**Ch~ical** 

## goggles or face shield.


## Other P=otective Clothing or**E~uip~enc:** 

## Acid

- resistant apron. 

## k/liygiene Practices: wash 

## work clotbes separacely from 

## other :'.J.othes. -.

4.2.4-548 

## Page 4 of 4 

# @

----_ 

### .. 

### .... ......DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS OGDEN AIR LOGISTICS CENTER (AFLCl HILL AIR FORCE BASE. UTAH 84056-5990



### Mr F. Burnell Cordner, Executive Secretary Bureau of Air Quality 1950 

### West North Temple P.O. Box 16690 

### Salt Lake City UT 84116-0690 

### RE: Request to supplement our NOI, 24 

### Apr 91, 

### Replacement Boilers Bldgs 2104 

### and 1904 

### Dear Mr Cordner On 24 

### Apr 91, 

### we submitted a Notice of Intent to construct two replacement boilers in Bldgs 2203 

### and 1624. 

### In addition to these, we also propose to install similar boilers in Bldgs 2104 

### and 1904. 

### We request our referenced NOI be supplemented to include these boilers. Design data and emissions from these boilers is provided. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Jay Gupta, EME, 777-6917. 

### Sincerely . ( 

# )0Nvtu 

# R.**U~~** JAME S R. VAN ORMAN ,...**":"~.~~** 

### 2 Atch 1. Design Data/Emissions Director o( Environmental Management 

### 2. Vendor Brochure

4.2.4-549 

# -Ii;IiC-- COMBAT STRENGTH THROUGH LOGISTICS

### REPLACEMENT BOILERS BLDGS 2104 

## & 1904 Bldg 2104: Bldg 2104 has two boilers; one is 200HP and the other 150HP. An 

### energy study has shown that if the larger boiler (200HP) was to fail, then the mission essential load could not be met by the smaller (150HP) boiler. There will be no change to the 200HP boiler. We propose to replace the 150HP boiler with a new 250HP boiler. Vendor brochure on the new boiler is attached. Design data is as follows: Boiler rating 250HP Primary fuel Natural Gas Back-up fuel #2 oil Steam Rate 8,625 Lbs/hr Total heat input 10.45MM BTU/hr Total heat output 8.37MM BTU/hr Thermal efficiency 80% Gas heating value 1,000 BTU/SCF Gas firing rate 10,450 SCFH, Add 10% 

## = 11,500 SCFH oil heating value 140,000 BTU/gal oil firing rate 1.24 GPM, Add 10% 

# = 1.4 GPM Estimated Stack Gas Volume; gas firing 4,270 ACFM oil firing 4,345 ACF M Flu Gas Temperature 465 of 

### EMISSIONS: Existing (150HP) Boiler: Boiler HP 

## = 150 Theoretical heat input 

## = 150 HP X 33,472 BTU/HP
= 

### 5.02 MM BTU 

### Fuel to Steam efficiency 

# = 80% Total heat input = 

### 5.02 = 

### 6.275 MM: 

### BTU/hr 0.8 Boiler probably averages out at 70

- 75% load Fuel firing rate: Gas (1,000 BTU/SCF) 

## = 6,275 SCFH oil (140,000 BTU/gal) 

## = 44.82 GPH operating hours: Only one boiler runs at a time and they alternate. These boilers operate from 15 Oct to 15 May and are generally shut-down during the summer. Estimate 5 months, 24 hours operation each boiler 

## = 3,600 hours. Use 4,000 hours. Emission factors AP-42, Tables 1.4-1 and 1.3-1



# -

4.2.4-550

### Gas Firing:
Pollutant Fuel lXl0 6

### CFH E.F. LB/I0 6

### Cu Ft EMISSIONS LB/Hr TPY Particulate .00627 3 .02 .04 PMl.o 

## = .02 SOX .00627 .6 Neg Neg NOX .00627 100 .627 1.25 HC .00627 6 .125 .08 CO .00627 20 20 .25 Oil Firing
Pollutant Fuel 1X10 3

### GPH E.F. LB/10 3

### Gal 

### EMISSIONS LB/Hr TPY Particulate .045 2 .09 .18 PMl.o 

## = .09 SOX .045 142 S 1.28 2.55 NOX .045 20 .90 1.80 HC .045 .34 .01 .03 CO .045 5 .22 .45 S 

## = 0.2 wt ?<­ 0 

### Sulfur, typical New (250) Boiler: Gas Firing
Pollutant Fuel lX10 6

### CFH E.F. LB/I0 6

### Cu Ft EMISSIONS LB/Hr TPY Particulate .0115 3 .03 .07 PMl.o 

### .03 

## = SOX .0115 .6 Neg .01 NOX .0115 100 1.15 2.3 HC .0115 6 .07 .13 CO .0115 20 .23 .46

4.2.4-551

# -, oil Firing Fuel E.F. EMISSIONS Pollutant 1X10 3

### GPH LB/10 3

### Gal LB/Hr Particulate .084 2 .17 .33 PM10 

## = .17 SOX .084 142 S 

### 2.38 4.77 NOX .084 20 1.68 3.36 HC .084 .34 .03 .06 CO .084 5 

### .42 .84 Net increase in emissions: Gas Firing NOX = 

### 1.05 TPY oil Firing NOX = 

### 1.56 TPY SOX = 

### 2. 22 TPY BLDG 1904 

### An existing boiler (a grandfathered source) had been removed from service in Bldg 1132 and was in storage near Bldg 2025. We propose to put this**~iler** 

### back in service in Bldg 1904. Design data and estimated emissions are as follows: Boiler HP = 

### 400 Theoratical heat input = 

### 400 HP X 33,472 BTU/HP
= 

### 13.39 MM BTU Thermal efficiency = 

### 80% Total heat input = 

### 13.39 

## = 16.74 MM BTU/Hr 0.8 

### Fuel firing rate: Gas (1,000 BTU/SCF) 

## = 16,740 SCFH, Add 10% 

## = 18,414 SCFH Oil (140,000 BTU/Gal) 

## = 119.6 GPH, Add 10% 

## = 131.5 GPH Operating Hours 

## = 4,OOO/Yr Emission Factors AP-42, Tables 1.4-1 and 1.3-1

4.2.4-552

### EMISSIONS Gas Firing Fuel Pollutant 1X10 6

### CFH Particulate .0184 SOX .0184 NOX .0184 HC .0184 .11 .22 CO .0184 Oil Firing Fuel Pollutant 1X10 3

### GPH Particulate .1315 SOX .1315 NOX .1315 HC .1315 CO .1315 E.F. LB/10 6

### Cu 3 .6 100

6 Ft EMISSIONS LB/Hr TPY .05 .11 PM10 

### .01 .02 1.84 3.68 

## = .05

20 .37 .73

E.F. LB/10 3

### Gal 2 142 S 20 .34 5 EMISSIONS LB/Hr TPY

.26 .52 PM10 

### 3.73 7.46 2.63 5.26

.04 .08 .65 1.31 

## = .26

4.2.4-553

# ___'CEWANEE,

_ CLASSIC III (60 H.R thru 800 H.R) ­ 150 PSI STEAM Packaged Scotch Design Firetube Boiler

Oil, Gas, Combination Oil/Gas Fired

• Boiler. Burner package IS U/L listed

. • These units. rated at 5.0 square feet of fireside neatlng

surface per bOiler horsepower. maXimize efficiency and servtce life.
• CLASSIC "' Packages are offered In 14 sizes ranging from

2.009.000 to 26.780.000 Btu/Hr 

### 160 to 800 Bhoj fired by a Kewanee gas. oil. or comOination**gas~1i** burner.
• Meets the requirements of ASME Code for 150 pSI Steam

\tCrking Pressure. IHigher WOrking pressures available.)
• Three Pass Design features a rear combustion C!l<lmber that's

totally surrounded by water. This eliminates 

### me need for refraCtory baffles. reduces COStly maintenance. eliminating refraCtory replacement Heat loss is mlnimlZeCI and over1leatlng of trle rear tube sheet is prevented. The wetback surface becomes additional primary heating surface. ImprOVlng bOiler performance.

. • All heating surfaces are accessible WithOut disturbing burner

equipment. redUCing inspeCtion and maintenance costs By uSing separate tube sheets the development of excessrve stresses caused by temperature differenoals between 

### me passes are eliminated. All tubes are roller expanded and beaded. 2" bOiler tubes are used on 60-250 hp and 2/; tubes on 300-800 hp. 

# ( • FaCtory installed 22 gauge enameled steel Jacket INitn glass or mineral fiber Insulation. Extra density insulation IS used at seleCted locations for additional proteCtion at potential

. pressure points.
• Hinged steel front flue doors lined wim refractory Insulation

contained by welded steel liner and guaranteed for a period of 10 years. Gasket gives gas-tight construC!Jon for pressurized firing

RATINGS & DATA
- 150 PSI STEAM 

### - , , UNIT NUMBER I 50 , 70 80 i 100 125 70 

## ":;J,;-

..., -- _I 50**2.3~3**

### ~1~~~'P~'''H'O~; 

### '':':'2**ii~F** 

### ..................:::',bs'**~m 2.~**  IS Steam Gross OuIDUt.

............... SlJ. 11 8.370 9.765 FIring Rate

Gas 11.000 BTU/CU It) Oil**(1~0.000** BTU) Oil (150000 BTU)

, Healing Sur1ace
- ASME ! Safely Valve CapaCity ; Insulaflon Thickness ! Minimum Stack Diameter : Steam Space

. Disengaging Area Waler Conient iful:) MBh gDh gph SQ. ft

Ibs In. In. cu It. SQ It. galS [w nOtmal waterline) gals. Annrol weight fluill lOS Dry weight los. ,upersedes Bulletin 20A-3 January. 1988 : 112.511 12.930 17.9 I 20.9 16.7 19.5

, 300 I 350 I**2.~00** I 2.800

1V,' IV,' 12' 12'
1 I 

## i 80 

### , 100 ! 125 I 2.676 

## I 3.348 ! 4.184 12760 I 3.450 4.3 13 , 111.160 ; 13.950 I 17.438 i

# I**3.3~6** : 4 185 i 5.23 I i 239 I 299: 3741 4481 598

96 118 i 65 I 7.5\ 64 I 17.6 I 20. I 

### n 8 I 219.1 295 1 335 i ! 378 ! 437**~99** I 591 i36 I 675 i 330 i 381 !**~36** I 519**5~7** , 75:

8.855 I**9.8~~** I 1 I .064 13.131 I 15.834 5.700 I 6.200 

### I 6.900 8.200 I 9,700 '.


## . .: 

### ..**~-** .... ' ...**~.(,.-~-:~.**

• Units tumlshed INim complete line of conuols consistmg of

combination water column. pump control. low water**cut~ff.** s.afety vatvels). steam pressure gauge. operating and limit pressure controls and 3" flue aas 

### mermometer. 

# ---

.. • 1".11 CLASSIC III Units are faCtory firetested. firing the unit Wlm

the specified fuel. adjustlng fuel & air ratios plus Checking all controls and operating sequence. A detailed report ofttlis test IS de/rvered to the purchaser wlm each unit.
• Guaranteed fuel to steam efficienCIes at 25 percent to 100

percent of full rating.

I 150 I 200 Ii 250 300 coo 1 500 I 600 i 750

_ .. ' I 600 I 800 150 200 I 250 300 1 750 20.085 25.106 26,78C 5021 : 6.695 , 6.369 i**10.0~3** I 20,700 25.875 27.60& 5 75 5.900 8.625 

### i 10.350 I 2C 925
.27.895 .: 34.875 , 41**.8~5** 83.690 104610 I 111.600 I I 6.2i8 : 6.370 350 350 COO 500 11)16 13.390 16.738 12.075 13.800 17250**~8.820** 55.795 69,750 110.463

## 12.55~ 

## I**1~.646** 116,740 120.925 125.110 I 31.383 i

## 33.~75 I . 22 3 i 2791 349 I 41 91 5581 

### I 400 500 I 625 750 .000 [' I 3.200**~.OOO** i 5.000 5000 

### e000 lY,' 1v,' 11',' 2" 2'
1 I 12' 12' 

# I**1~'** '"," , 6': .5 7471 89.7 104.61 1196 149.5 I 179.41 224.2: 2391 69.8! 83.7 976 11161 139.51 1674: 209.2 2232: 1,2S0 ; 1.500 1)50 I 2.000 I 2.500 I 3.000 I 3,75C I 3,750·.f 10,000 112.000 'I 14.000! 15.000 20.000 '24.000 30.000 I 30.000 I 2": 2' 2': 2' 2": 2" 2' I 2" 

## I I 20' i 20' 20' I**2~' 2~'**  i 27' 30' I 30' 

## I**3~.81** 4311 4991 69

. 71 77.11 8iOI**:07t)~1** 5371 601 69.51 7531 83.01 91.1**~12TI** 112.7 1474 1987 

## I 2302 1:214 i 1664 1929 36,771 42,798 20.200 23.600
• Except 800 HP 

### =".7 Sq. Ft/Bhp DIMENSIONS. [Y\tA, SUBJECT TO CHf'J\lGE WITHOUT NOTICE . 2729 3.004 3526 , (394 • 4.394 I 2:208 I 2.427 I' 2:375 I 3.589 i 3.589 I 150.855 56.952 167.507 83.5C6 83.S-C5 I 28,100 31.900 38.1 00**~6.900 46.:0.,Q..!~**  Bulletin 201 Aprll.19 L 

### 4.2.4-554 

## Lookahead with 

# KEWANEE.., HH M v l,

­ x B o o 'l.

,- - U •

. •. BB FF AA A•• A,­ 60 H.P thru 250 H.P.

HH -L--------.-v--· M

.

- .' x**-,l,~** B

- F'7'-' -0**-~** o



### c w

H**~-** -_. BB .-. I ,P ,...cc..



# ..... 

# .. •••• II ••• N

300 H.p. thru 800 H.P.

...**_,,~HSIOHS** (Ieel·inclles) /"' I UNIT NUMBER 60 I 70----r8011ii0 I 125 150 i - ZOO I' 250/1 300 

### ;--350- I .00 500 -600 -:- 

### iso--:--jocl ! A'**~O~r~l~n~h** ••••••• - ••- ••

-••**-.-.~~1~~M~"~1~1~1~~+1~1~2~~~M~"~1~1~~~'~\',"~1 ~14~~~M~"~'1~1~~~r~I~1~7~1;~~"~I~~~~1;7~~~"~1~19~~~1'>~"~!~1~~S;~~"~i~2~;9;"~72~l';10;1'>~"~:**  _ •••••••••••• -.-**2S1M"i~~2~"** j A' Oviralllenoll1 indudino luDe removal....... 14'4" ; B**-O~ralIWldth...............................** 5'5" 

## ,c**-O~raliheioht..............................** 6'0' ,0**~Botiercen1erhnetoorutesIWldll'l..........** 3'l'h" 

## I

B8
- Base width

.................... .-............ 

### cc - BlSll heioht

................................. I EE
- BlSll to rear 01 DOuer

.. ;
....................

'0

_ Base to Iront of Durner

..................... Tube removal space
........................ 1'0" 2'2'h" 3'O'h" 

# I 4'0" 1'5" 1'0" 1'3" 7'10\':"

5'5" 4" 3'2'1:" 5'6" .'2'" I" 3'6" 2'r 1'1'­**S'~"** 

### I 4'6"

4'2'"



### - 1'0" 4'2'" 3'4" 6" 1'9\':­ 4'1" 5'11" 16'2W 18'1 V," I 17'8",. 21'4" 21'1\'>" I 27'01''', 28'2" 27'4'h" , 31'4" I 28'8","1 31'6' 33'01'>" I 40'S\'>" i 40'51'1" I 5'5" 'I 5'5" I 5'11\'>": S'll'h" i**6'5~"** 6'5V," II 6'0"**3~1'~:"** II**36:~~** 'I 6'r II 7'3" ,'4"

,**3'1~"** n -., 3'41'>" 3'S" 3'8"

, 1'0' I 1'0' 1'0" I 1'0' 1'0' I "0" 2'2'h" 2'2'h" I 2'4\,>" 2'4'h" 2'r 2'9" 3'O'h" 3'O'h" I 3'61'>" 3'6\'>" I 3'9'h" J'g,;" 4'0" 4'0' 4'6" 

## i

I I 4'6" 5'0" 

### , 5'0' I 1'5" I 1'5" I ,'S" 1'8" I 1'11" I 1'''"



## ... 

# I 1'0" 1'0' 1'2'" 1'2" 1'4" I

"3" 1'3" 1'5" 1'5" 17" I 

## '7­ S'lO'**~g\'," ~6"**  11'4" 11'3'1:" I 14'3" I 

## I 5'5" 5'5" 6'2" 6'2" 5'8" 6'8" 

## I I I , 4' 6" 

## I I 3'2"'"

5'6' 6'9" 7'11" 1" 11,1, I 3'6" 3'6" S'll\'," 3'8Y>"**1~"** 2" 6'3Y," 10'6'1:" .'6" 57" .'6" 

# - 5'S'I:" 1'0' 

## - 1'3' 5'0" 10'0' 3'10'

8" 2'1\'>" 47" 3'4'
S'2' 

# "rl"/ 12'1" 6'10"**~" ~"**  I I 4" 4' ny," I 3'21'>" J'2v'" 3'2'1:" 3'2'1:" 5'6" 6'3" 6'J" 6'9" , 

## I**4'9~"** 

## I S'3\'>" J'3" 4'9" 5'0'1:" 

### ,%­ 11f,· , 'I? 1'1/ I 3'6" J'6" 3'6" 3'5" I

4'B" 4'3W 6'l'h" 6'0" 1**~~"** 1\'>"**1~"** lY>" 6'10Y,"**7'6~"** 7'3" n" 5'21',' 4'6" 5'2\'>"



### - 57" 4'11\'>" 

### - -

- 57" S'8\'>" 5'5\1," 1'3" I 1'3" 

## I 1'0' 1'3" I 5'0" 6'S" 5'10" 6'B" 

# I
3'6" 3'6" I 3'4" 3'10' 6" 6" 6" 8" 2'51'>" 2'0'1:" 27'1:" 2'6" 4'11" 47" 5'2" 4'1'" 7'5" 7'9Y>"**~3" ~1'1:"**  I TO' 8'on"ls'o'h" i**~Ol'>"'** g'Ol'!" 9'6' 

## I 9'6" 

## i 9'6: I 7'11" 9'2'h"**~2'h"** I**~11~"1 ~11'h"** **11'1~",** 11'11'''1 11'l'h"

. 

### I 3'11" 4'5" 4'5" 4'11", 4'n" 5'2" 

### I 5'2" I 5'2" ;


### , , , 

# . , I 1- 1'2" ''2" I "4"' ".. 1'4" I 1"**I~** 

# - I I 2'r "10' I "10" I 2'10' 2'10" I 2'10" ! 2'4" 2'4" I I 4'01'>" I 4'61'>" 4'6'h"**5'O~"** I 5'0';'"**5'S~"** I 5'8n" 5'8Y>" !
, 5'6" I 6'6" 6'6" I 7'6" 

### , 7'6' i S'O' ! S'O" I S'O" 

### , , I 1 I 2'1" 

### i 2'6" I 2'6" i 2'10" I 2'10' I 3'1" I 3'1' I 3'1"

"8" l'S" I 1'8" 2'0' ! 2'0' : 2'3" I 2'6' 2'6" I I 1'11" 

## I 1'11" 2'3" I 2'3" , 2'6" I I 2'g" 2'r 1'11" I I 14'9\'," 16'9" lS'5'i." I 16'101'2. 1 17'10W I 217" 21'7" 

# I**1~"1** , I ! 8'2"

. 8'2" 1 9'2\'>" ! 6" 6" 8" 8"

, 3"2".7"**~'61'>"** 4'61'>" 4'6\'>" 3'4' S'3'1:"**~4"** n" 8'6" S'2\'>" 7'2" n" 1y,' I In" 2' 2\'>" 3'8" 4'1' ,**~'8'** 

## I 4'" I

8'111'>" 9'0' 10'6\'>" I 8'9" I 2"' 2" 2" I 2"**1~11M'1** 11'2" 

### ; 13'1 I':" 

### t 12'0' 5'10'



### - 5'11 'I:"

1'3" 10'0" 4'2'" 8" 2"81':" 5'2" t2"5\'>" 6'9" I 5'9' ! 7'5V,"

- I

- I
­ S'6'1:"**9'4~" S'S~"**  I 1'3" 1'3" 1'3' , 147" I 16'3" I 15'11" 

## ! 17'3" I 17'6" I 21'2" 

### ! 21'2" !
t 

### , 1 

### i----w­ nO"**~'lO'** 5'4' 5'4- I 5'9' 5'9' 10" , o· 10' 10" I 

### s· 

## I 8" ! 10' 

### I i ! I 2'4"**2',~'** I 2'9" 7S· 

### I**3'~'I:"** 2'91);' I 2'9\'>" I I 

## - - - I 

### - I I ­ I

1**1'8~"** 

## !**'3:a~"1** 

### 12'2'1."1 r 13']" 14'0' 

## I 177" 

### ! In"

, I 

## I I


### - i 9'2' 8' 4'6\'>" 9'4' 9'9'1:" 2'1:" 

### I 4'8'

10"" 

### I , "' I 10'0'1:' I**11'6~'** 8'4"

## 7'~'1 :**7'3:~"** I 9'10'1:" 

## I 9'a;,'/9'SY," 

# i
1'3' l'S" ! l'S" l'S": !**1~1"** 10" 6'9'l:" 10'4" 9'5" 2'h' 5'6"**g'10~"** I 2' i 10.,. 

## I**1~1"** 10" I 10" 6'91'>" j 6'9\'>' I**1~4"** I 10'4" ;

, 1'11' : 11'11"**2~~"** 

## i 2'1:" 1 5'1""1 5"" : 13'101'2" 13'10'1:" !

2' i 2" I**1~10~ "110'10~"**  : S'4" I 8'4" : IE

# I~ ­

- 

# Ii

­ 

## i L'
­ ! L'
­ 1 M

­ !II

­ P

­ 0

­ R T

­

- U'
­ U'
­

- V
­ W ­ X

­

- Z

­ U ­ R ill' DOxto Sl'I II ........................... Burner to front of boiler,

................... Boiler centertine heiOhl

..................... Shel diameter,

..................... , ....... Furnace diameter

........................... e ue e

Flue ouUet diameter

........................ Flue ou1letllanoe diameler

................. flue outlet centerline

....................... flue outlet heioht

........................... Sllpply size 300 lb. ANSlflanoe

............. Sllppty centerline

........................... SllplJlY neioht

...............................**f~edwater** centertine
-**~acn** SIde

.......... feedwaler size
- NP'T

..................... Reill' blawofl
- centerline to reill' ot DOiler •• 8Iawotl centertine to cenlertine

............. Blawofl size
- both
- NPT

................ Safety**val~** centerune

...................... Normal W:llertine

........................... Handhole centerkne

........................ ManhOle centerline

......................... Base heiOht
- 1I00r to DOIler

............... Base Ienoth

.................................



### 4,2.4-555 KEWANEE BOILER COMPANY, INC. A subsidiary of Coppus Engineering Corporation 101 Franklin Street. Kewanee. Illinois 61443

13091853-3541" Fax: (3091 852-0424 © 1989**K~Wilne-e** Boi**'~r** Cn In(, 1

. -",

. i



### For CL/\SSfC [i f 

### Packagc'd Scotch 

## Deslg'l Fi rct:;(:;e 

### Oil. Gas,**Cornbin~ltjon** 

### Oii/Gas Firec

. III 

### usre-c**wa~ 5",Jf"~':**  2:f o:-"C-":"(! for Oil. r.arura; C2S 0' ;:;:o;:.c:re ...;as. or com::)II-.3i.:':J:".**,~,:.-v~.** (,r,nc EaC1l**Kev.'<l~** Fore",: 0,2:'1 Burner 15 custom**c;'tj;~<-<:,<."'d** fotthe paCK-age It fIres. 2SSw,,('\.:; long. depend.3:J:e a":;': e-cc:-.)m;c.31 service.
•**Nflv'~"'.** lA Contro: C2:J,,"": f-:<J[:.IreS elearonrc**F:a.~** S,afc-c..,arG

'and programmn:; CO'1:(O::'. 'elr flow safety SlNltCTl. COjec­**v.~rlng.** num:::>ere--:::: ,-:,[';'),:".,3: "TIp and console 6C-2SC HP 3:):)- 800 HP

• CLfo.'sSIC II: U,'1lts a:e**e-q~I~;:r.<:,·.r;?:** /:t'·

...**;a~** P;e-sure or!-Y'

A(Qm:ZIr>g**6ur~r"** Pressure ."-.tOm,z<:Ig units fire light oil. ar'ld co:n;:l::-,awo",: oas-l'o:'; oj' hi r.;::>m,ZI;-":;**unl~** fire NO.6 (l00 rip t,J 8C1J ru/ or-IIOh;er oil. a:-.j como,:'.aUClO oas-oi!. Botl1 pressurf '<J()(J'**a,~** atomlze<i un,rs <Jre of**f.a~** retention des'gr.

• 5.e<ond oil solenoid "'<l!V'e**flJfT1IS~** 25 star>Varc on

6Q H:=-800 HP 60iier>

f :::>e 4K f\.lTIHGS & OAT" ! 7' I a I 

# • : 

# I

, i Z' 7" r :r :r :r 1 5.3 I U 

### ! 7!.J 15.5 131 16.3 I 3.l ! 3' 

### , 3.l 

# I**~.** e1 

### I S1 

### , 1 iii

. 10 

### is 15 I**T~** 10 1$ 15 

### ! 7':: 10 IS 15 

# 1
; I 

### ,


### ­ 

# '" :; 1 3 1 5 1 I 

### ... 'I> 'I> 'n ! \ 

# .. !

# ~~~**~......................** i _ "1,-

# ~I 

# -!' 13000_ 

### ,I 3000_ 3:XX:_ 

# i Q;)j 

### lsooc j6QOC 

## II &"JOC 

# I, CV''« 

### l1?OQC' 

### I' ZOOX'!2tJOC 

### 13XlOO

# '»»;1 !, 1 SOOO 

### 11 SOOC

, lOG 6 0<: I I?O(Y.. 3:xlC 3-."'()():

.... 0')() 

### :ff.iV! eooo SOOO 100..-':; 1?DOO 15000 1seal I 

## I**~"O' c.:~;·~·~~·.·.···.·.·.::** **-~** 

# -

- I 

## I ' .**~~I** 11>-&C; -;

### ~~ I : C<:",C'c>

- \ '. i, ,I

_ I: ,: I 

### ! ;. 

# i \---j I 

# ii

. - rr "". 

### ""_,

## ~~**~':~:::;:):. =---:,~** **'-",,~.~:;-..;** i 

### I! 'i ••.• I' "-

## :::"'wO:l,~ .::-F;--.

### P.'~ ()i' "" 'J,>

### ~"**~-"..,** - 

## ---ol--- -....,.....-**--c--I.L:~.A::r..** 

### ! 

# I 1
• I l

- -, - I - 1< '-" i I.I:-::,"::CO; , l I .**~v.1rC** .. ""

_•. _ , lJV\(3K ."**~'J'''''U·5+** .e**[:-2"J~** ! j i,

.

# "= -.. surE**P.)~DES** BUu.£TlN**2CA~ RU~l£TI~**  20A·/, A;Jrli. /929**;.orli;~')** 1982 

### 4.2.4-556 

## Lookahead**~~'ith** 

## !(EE,il4lrJp,-:E.**I<£"...--:.A~~F£** 'J'::>:LER COMPANY. :IJC. A**'.~ J~·\!·1:~V·\·** **o~ .~:(,/,**  J./) n'JI; ;t,.a;."r.I I,J (\.., .-..:',; .=<:Iorl 

# ii

### DEPARTMENT OF HEAL7H DI\J1SION OF**E\vlRON~1E;\7AL** 

### HEALTH

288**NO"~** 1.60 west 00 Sox t 6690**~.** \ .',**Jl~** I. t' , IIr.'1 ,••r Sail LaKe Cd"**lJ~an** 84116·0690 cOl) 5::8·6108

3AQE-6BB-88



### November 9. 1988

Newspaper Agency Salt Lake Tribune Legal Advertising Department 157 Regent Street Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Gentlemen: This letter will confirm the authorization to publish the attached NOTICE in the Salt Lake Tribune and Deseret News on November 18,**~988.** 

### Please mail the invoice and affidavit of publication to t.he Utah State Deparment of Health , Divis ion of Environmental Health, Bureau of Air Quality, P.O. Box 16690, Salt Lake City, Utah B4116-0690.

# S~~)f~ David Kopta. Manager Engineering Unit Bureau of Air Quality Enclosure DK/cc



### 4.2.4-557/**~.**


### NOTICE The following notices of intent to construct, submitted in accordance with Section 3.1, Utah Air Conservation Regulations. have been received for consideration by the Executive Secretary. Utah Air Conservation Committee: 1. Indian Oil Company. Used Oil Recycling Plant, Utah County 2. FCI Chemical Engineers. Gypsum**Excavat~on** 

### and Handling. Salt Lake County 3. Amoco Oil Company. 3ackup ?lare System on Loading Racks. SAlt Lake County 4. Department of the Air Force. Carbon Brake Repair Facility, Bldg. 267, Davis County 5. Brackenbury, Conn and Associates, Portable Tank Leaching Operation, Duchesne County 6. Advance Foam Plastics, Expanded Polystyrene Plant. Salt Lake County 7. Golden Eagle Environmental and Recycling Services, API Separator and 14 Storage Tanks, Davis County 8. Morton Thiokol, Inc., Changes to X-17 Automotive Products Facility, Weber County The engineering evaluations and air quality impact analyses have been completed and no adverse air quality impacts are expected. No Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) increment will be consumed by these proposals. It is the intent to the Executive Secretary to approve the construction projects. The construction proposals and estimates of the effect on local air quality are available for public inspection and comment at the Bureau of Air Quality, Utah State Department of Health, 288 North 1460 West, Salt Lake City, Utah 84116­ 0690. Written comments received by the Bureau, 288 North 1460 West, P.O. Box 16690, Salt Lake City, Utah 84116-0690, on or before December 16, 1988 will be considered in making the final decision on the approval or disapproval of the proposed construction. If anyone so requests within 15 days of publication of notice, a hearing will be held in the area of the proposed construction, installation. modification. relocation, or establishment. Date of Notice: November 18, 1988 

### 4.2.4-558