alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                            JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                              SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                                            545
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   35970
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      637
<INVENTORY>                                                      1755
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                39299
<PP&E>                                                          93816
<DEPRECIATION>                                                (25789)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 374051
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           61997
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         9
<COMMON>                                                           60
<OTHER-SE>                                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   374051
<SALES>                                                        110895
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               110895
<CGS>                                                           59252
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   59252
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                39118
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              15246
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                (4730)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       74
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            (4804)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 (310)
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   (5114)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  (0.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  (0.51)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           7,945                   1,020
<SECURITIES>                                     2,057                   4,954
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,109                   3,018
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (304)                   (200)
<INVENTORY>                                        936                     840
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,039                  10,283
<PP&E>                                           3,459                   4,830
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (2,203)                 (2,981)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,594                  12,215
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,219                   5,565
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        25,578                  29,650
<OTHER-SE>                                     (14,418)                (23,083)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,594                  12,215
<SALES>                                          3,032                   1,935
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,722                   2,674
<CGS>                                            1,303                     985
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,643                   1,241
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,104                   3,979
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (944)                 (2,479)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (944)                 (2,479)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (944)                 (2,479)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.14)                  (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.14)                  (0.32)
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Rachel PERRY, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-10198 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 20, 2017

*249James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Rachel Perry, Pro Se

Before JONES, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rachel Perry has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Perry has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           BD
<LEGEND>            This schedule contains summary financial information
                    extracted from the financial statements for The
                    Jones Financial Companies for the 3 months ended
                    September 26, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by
                    reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1997
<CASH>                                          45,650
<RECEIVABLES>                                  850,365
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                             15,450
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                           10,249
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            230,531
<PP&E>                                         185,804
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,408,718
<SHORT-TERM>                                     6,000
<PAYABLES>                                     631,958
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                             10,643
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                              16,943
<LONG-TERM>                                    271,834
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     271,246
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,408,718
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                    0
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                            64,880
<COMMISSIONS>                                  690,156
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                   10,982
<FEE-REVENUE>                                   65,623
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,167
<COMPENSATION>                                 475,613
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 83,757
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      83,757
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    83,757
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WILEY ESTILL GAMBREL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 329 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 7th day of January, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.

Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      10,673,278
<SECURITIES>                                 4,873,358
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,361,421
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,170,101
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,350,935
<PP&E>                                      18,921,313
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,346,383
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,568,174
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,293,107
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,996
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,292,050
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,568,174
<SALES>                                      5,265,230
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,844,988
<CGS>                                        2,174,816
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,174,816
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,481,840
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (4,788,743)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (4,788,743)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (4,788,743)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.24)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 61 (Wednesday, March 30, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 18380]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06848]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTER-AMERICAN FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: April 6, 2022, 12:45 p.m.-2:00 p.m. ET.

PLACE: Via Zoom.

STATUS: Meeting of the IAF Board of Directors, open to the public, 
portion closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
[ssquf] Call to Order from the Board Chair
[ssquf] Overview of Meeting Rules by General Counsel
[ssquf] Approval of February 16 & 17th, 2022 Meeting Minutes
[ssquf] Briefing on Anti-Deficiency Act
[ssquf] Briefing on Grants Oversight Committee
[ssquf] Briefing on May 3rd Board Meeting Logistics/Reception
[ssquf] Adjournment

PORTION TO BE CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC: Executive session closed to the 
public as provided for by 22 CFR 1004.4(b).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Aswathi Zachariah, General 
Counsel, (202) 683-7118.
    For Dial-in Information Contact: Denetra McPherson, Paralegal, 
(202) 688-3054.
    The Inter-American Foundation is holding this meeting under the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b).

Aswathi Zachariah,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2022-06848 Filed 3-28-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7025-01-P
#### SMITH, S. v. SMITH, C.

190 MDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/07/2017

Reargument Denied 11/9/2017

2013-20491 (Lebanon)

Affirmed
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ELISHA BALLARD

, §

§ No . 361, 2017

P laintiff Below

, §

Appellant, §

§ Court Below: The Superior Court

v. § of the State of Delaware

§

TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS § C.A. No. N16 C

- 10

- 177 JRJ

AMERICA, INC., TAKEDA §

PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., §

INC., f/k/a TAKEDA §

PHARMACEUTICALS NORTH §

AMERICA, INC., TAKEDA §

PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY §

LIMITED, and ELI LILLY AND §

COMPANY, §

§

Defendants Below, §

Appellee s

. §

Submitted: April 18 , 2018

Decided: Apri l 23 , 2018

Before STRINE , Chief Justice; SEITZ

, and TRAYNOR

, Justices.

O R D E R

This 23 rd d ay of April 2018 , it appears to the Court that the judgment of the

Superior Court should be affirmed on the basis of its opinion dated Aug ust 7, 2017

. 1

1 Ballard v. Takeda Pharm. Am., Inc. , 2017 WL 3396488 (Del. Super. Ct. Aug. 7, 2017).2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior

Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.

Chief Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          24,113
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,577
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         108,272
<DEPRECIATION>                                (23,298)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 149,644
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         76,255
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        56,669
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,353)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   149,644
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,907
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,381
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,520
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     81
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                130
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (49)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        81
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01


</TABLE>
ROBERT DARREN WINSLOW

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 4747

__ ___________________________/

Opinion filed January 6, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Nassau County

. Robert M. Foster , Judge

.

William J. Sheppard, Elizabeth L. White, Matthew R. Kachergus and Bryan E.

DeMaggio, of Sheppard, White, Kachergus & DeMaggio, P.A., Jacksonville , for

Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., WOLF and ROBERTS, JJ., CONCUR.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 99

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

                      PETROCORP ACQUIRES CANADIAN COMPANY

     HOUSTON (January 7, 1997)--PetroCorp Incorporated (NASDAQ:PETR) today 
announced its acquisition of Millarville Oil & Gas Ltd., a privately held 
Alberta corporation that owns and operates oil and gas properties in Alberta, 
Canada. The transaction was completed on December 23, 1996.

     Proved developed reserves acquired in the transaction total 0.9 million 
barrels of oil and 6.4 Bcf of natural gas. Average net daily production from the
properties in 1996 was 443 barrels of oil and 2,770 Mcf of natural gas. The cash
acquisition price was $11.7 million ($US). PetroCorp, through its Canadian 
subsidiary PCC Energy Limited, will become operator of approximately 65% of the 
acquired reserves.

     On an unaudited pro forma basis, as though the transaction occurred at the 
beginning of 1996, the Millarville acquisition would have increased PetroCorp's 
1996 revenues by $4.3 million, earnings by $0.9 million and cash flow by $2.9 
million.

     Neil McBean, President and Chief Executive Officer of PetroCorp, said, 
"Strategically, the acquisition is a significant addition to our existing 
holdings in Alberta, one of our core areas. The acquisition is also important in
establishing PetroCorp as an operator in Alberta, which we believe will open 
other doors to opportunity there.

     "We are very excited about these properties, both in the quality of 
existing reserves, and the opportunity to increase the reserves through 
additional development. We have already taken steps to improve the operating 
efficiency of the properties. During the first half of 1997, we will be 
acquiring 2-D and 3-D seismic data that we hope will confirm drilling plans for 
the second half of the year. At the corporate level, only a minimal increase in 
our staff will be necessary."

     PetroCorp, a Houston-based company, explores, develops and acquires oil and
gas properties in North America. The Company operates principally in the states 
of Colorado, Oklahoma, Kansas, Texas and Mississippi and in the province of 
Alberta, Canada.

CONTACT: Craig K. Townsend, Vice President--Finance, (281) 875-2500.
#### IN RE: Roberto Antoine DARDEN, a/k/a Dizz-e, a/k/a Javon, Petitioner.

No. 17-2011

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 20, 2018

Decided: March 2, 2018

*225Roberto Antoine Darden, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Roberto Antoine Darden petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and motions to expand the record. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. The district court denied Dar-den’s motions on February 8, 2018. *United States v. Darden,*No. 4:11-cr-00052-AWA-LRL-1 (E.D. Va., PACER Nos. 158, 159). Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED*
|                                          |
|------------------------------------------|
|                                          |  |  |
| Name of Subsidiary                       |   | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |
|                                     |   |   |
| Memphis Publishing Company               |   | Delaware |
| Evansville Courier Company, Inc.         |   | Indiana |
| Boat Spinco, Inc.                        |   | Wisconsin |
| Desk Spinco, Inc.                        |   | Wisconsin |
| Journal Community Publishing Group, Inc. |   | Wisconsin |
| Journal Sentinel Inc.                    |   | Wisconsin |
| Scripps NP Operating, LLC                |   | Wisconsin |
Exhibit
32.2























CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P.
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 28, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven Novik,
Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, certify to the best of my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d)of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      materialrespects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.











/s/  Steven
Novik


Chief Financial Officer


The Jones Financial Companies,
L.L.L.P.


May 9, 2008
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12

- 40807 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. CEDRIC EARL OLIVER, also known as Fella , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 2:10

- CR

- 16

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Cedric Earl Oliver has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United Sta tes v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Oliver has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Oliver ’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; such a claim generally “cannot be resolved on direct appeal when the claim has

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 20, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 12-40807 Document: 00512567946 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/20/2014No. 12

- 40807

not been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.” United States v. Cantwell , 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 ( 5th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Oliver ’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no no nfrivolo us issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, Oliver’s motion to relieve counsel and proceed pro se is DENIED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R . 42.2.

2 Case: 12-40807 Document: 00512567946 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/20/2014