Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 67 / Thursday, April 7, 2022 / Notices 20461 

Written submissions.—As provided in 

§§ 201.8 and 207.15 of the 

Commission’s rules, any person may 

submit to the Commission on or before 

April 26, 2022, a written brief 

containing information and arguments 

pertinent to the subject matter of the 

investigations. Parties shall file written 

testimony and supplementary material 

in connection with their presentation at 

the conference no later than noon on 

April 20, 2022. All written submissions 

must conform with the provisions of 

§ 201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any 

submissions that contain BPI must also 

conform with the requirements of 

§§ 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the 

Commission’s rules. The Commission’s 

Handbook on Filing Procedures, 

available on the Commission’s website 

at https://www.usitc.gov/documents/ 

handbook_on_filing_procedures.pdf, 

elaborates upon the Commission’s 

procedures with respect to filings. 

In accordance with §§ 201.16(c) and 

207.3 of the rules, each document filed 

by a party to the investigations must be 

served on all other parties to the 

investigations (as identified by either 

the public or BPI service list), and a 

certificate of service must be timely 

filed. The Secretary will not accept a 

document for filing without a certificate 

of service. 

Certification.—Pursuant to § 207.3 of 

the Commission’s rules, any person 

submitting information to the 

Commission in connection with these 

investigations must certify that the 

information is accurate and complete to 

the best of the submitter’s knowledge. In 

making the certification, the submitter 

will acknowledge that any information 

that it submits to the Commission 

during these investigations may be 

disclosed to and used: (i) By the 

Commission, its employees and Offices, 

and contract personnel (a) for 

developing or maintaining the records 

of these or related investigations or 

reviews, or (b) in internal investigations, 

audits, reviews, and evaluations relating 

to the programs, personnel, and 

operations of the Commission including 

under 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by 

U.S. government employees and 

contract personnel, solely for 

cybersecurity purposes. All contract 

personnel will sign appropriate 

nondisclosure agreements. 

Authority: These investigations are 

being conducted under authority of title 

VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice 

is published pursuant to § 207.12 of the 

Commission’s rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: April 1, 2022. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2022–07353 Filed 4–6–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1264] 

In the Matter of Certain High-Potency 

Sweeteners, Processes for Making 

Same, and Products Containing Same; 

Notice of a Commission Determination 

Not To Review an Initial Determination 

Granting Summary Determination of 

No Violation of Section 337; 

Terminating the Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) has 

determined not to review an initial 

determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 29) of 

the presiding administrative law judge 

granting summary determination of no 

violation of section 337. This 

investigation is terminated. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Benjamin S. Richards, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–5453. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on May 14, 2021. 86 FR 26544–45 (May 

14, 2021). The complaint, as 

supplemented, was filed by 

complainants Celanese International 

Corporation of Irving, Texas; Celanese 

(Malta) Company 2 Limited of Qormi, 

Malta; and Celanese Sales U.S. Ltd. of 

Irving, Texas (collectively ‘‘Celanese’’) 

and alleged violations of section 337 of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain high-potency 

sweeteners, processes for making same, 

and products containing same by reason 

of infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent No. 10,023,546, U.S. Patent No. 

10,208,004, U.S. Patent No. 10,590,098, 

U.S. Patent No. 10,233,163, and U.S. 

Patent No. 10,590,095. Id. The 

complaint further alleged that a 

domestic industry exists. Id. The 

Commission’s notice of investigation 

named twelve respondents, including 

Anhui Jinhe Industrial Co., Ltd. and 

Jinhe USA LLC (‘‘Jinhe’’). Id. On August 

6, 2021, the Chief Administrative Law 

Judge (‘‘CALJ’’) issued an ID granting a 

motion by Celanese to add eleven 

additional respondents to the 

investigation. Order No. 14, unreviewed 

by Comm’n Notice (Aug. 23, 2021). On 

August 26, 2021, Celanese filed an 

amended complaint adding the eleven 

additional respondents. The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) is 

also participating in this investigation. 

86 FR at 26544. 

On September 2, 2021, respondent 

Jinhe filed a motion for summary 

determination of no violation based on 

the contention that all of the asserted 

patent claims that Celanese relied on to 

satisfy the technical prong of the 

domestic industry requirement are 

invalid under the ‘‘on-sale bar’’ 

provisions of 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1). On 

September 13, 2021, Celanese filed a 

brief in opposition. OUII filed a brief in 

support of Jinhe’s motion on the same 

day. The CALJ held oral argument on 

Jinhe’s motion on September 28, 2021. 

The CALJ issued the subject ID 

granting Jinhe’s motion on January 11, 

2022. Specifically, the ID found that the 

on-sale bar applied to invalidate all of 

the remaining claims that Celanese 

relied on to establish a domestic 

industry. Accordingly, the ID found that 

the investigation should be terminated 

with a finding of no violation of section 

337 due to Celanese’s inability to satisfy 

the domestic industry requirement of 

section 337. Celanese petitioned for 

review of the ID on January 21, 2022. 

Jinhe and OUII submitted responses 

opposing Celanese’s petition on January 

28, 2022. 

Having examined the record of this 

investigation, including the ID, the 

petition for review, and the responses 

thereto, the Commission has determined 

not to review the ID. This investigation 

is terminated in its entirety. 

The Commission vote for this 

determination took place on April 1, 

2022. 

While temporary remote operating 

procedures are in place in response to 

COVID–19, the Office of the Secretary is 

not able to serve parties that have not 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
20462 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 67 / Thursday, April 7, 2022 / Notices 

retained counsel or otherwise provided 

a point of contact for electronic service. 

Accordingly, pursuant to Commission 

Rules 201.16(a) and 210.7(a)(1) (19 CFR 

201.16(a), 210.7(a)(1)), the Commission 

orders that the Complainant(s) complete 

service for any party/parties without a 

method of electronic service noted on 

the attached Certificate of Service and 

shall file proof of service on the 

Electronic Document Information 

System (EDIS). 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: April 1, 2022. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2022–07352 Filed 4–6–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1282] 

Certain Tunable Lenses and Products 

Containing the Same; Notice of the 

Commission’s Determination Not To 

Review an Initial Determination 

Terminating the Investigation on the 

Basis of Settlement; Termination of the 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review the presiding administrative law 

judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination 

(‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 13) terminating the 

investigation on the basis of settlement. 

The investigation is terminated. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Amanda Pitcher Fisherow, Esq., Office 

of the General Counsel, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2737. Copies of 

non-confidential documents filed in 

connection with this investigation may 

be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at https://

edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, 

please email EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server at https://

www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on October 28, 2021, based on a 

complaint filed by Holochip 

Corporation of Torrance, California. 86 

FR 59757–58 (Oct. 28, 2021). The 

complaint, as supplemented, alleged 

violations of section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, based upon the importation into 

the United States, the sale for 

importation, and the sale within the 

United States after importation of 

certain tunable lenses and products 

containing the same by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent No. 8,064,142; U.S. Patent No. 

8,605,361; U.S. Patent No. 8,665,527; 

and U.S. Patent No. 9,442,225. The 

complaint, as amended, further alleged 

that a domestic industry exists. The 

notice of investigation named as 

respondents Optotune AG of Dietikon, 

Switzerland, and Edmund Optics, Inc. 

of Barrington, New Jersey. Id. 

On March 7, 2022, the private parties 

filed a joint motion to terminate the 

investigation based on settlement. On 

March 10, 2022, the presiding ALJ 

issued Order No. 13, granting the joint 

motion. The ALJ determined that the 

motion complied with Commission 

Rule, 210.21(b), 19 CFR 210.21(b). The 

ALJ also determined that there is no 

evidence that termination of this 

investigation would adversely affect the 

public interest. No one petitioned for 

review of the ID. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the ID. The investigation is 

terminated. 

The Commission vote for this 

determination took place on April 1, 

2022. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: April 1, 2022. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2022–07350 Filed 4–6–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–1563 (Final)] 

Raw Honey From Ukraine; Termination 

of Investigation 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: On March 24, 2022, counsel 

for petitioners, the American Honey 

Producers Association and the Sioux 

Honey Association, filed with the 

Department of Commerce and the 

Commission a withdrawal of their 

petition regarding imports of raw honey 

from Ukraine. Accordingly, the 

antidumping duty investigation 

concerning raw honey from Ukraine 

(Investigation No. 731–TA–1563 (Final)) 

is terminated. 

DATES: March 31, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Andres Andrade (202–205–2078), Office 

of Investigations, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired individuals are advised that 

information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server (https://

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

this investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

Authority: This investigation is being 

terminated under authority of title VII of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 and pursuant to 

19 U.S.C. 1673c(a)(1)(A) and section 

207.40(a) of the Commission’s rules (19 

CFR 207.40(a)). This notice is published 

pursuant to section 201.10 of the 

Commission’s rules (19 CFR 201.10). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: April 1, 2022. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2022–07351 Filed 4–6–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES