alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
To	whom	it	May	Concern:

My	name	is	Christopher	Smith,	and	I	currently	reside	in	Poplar	Bluff,	Missouri.		I	

have	worked	as	a	school	teacher	and	coach	for	the	last	6	years	and	wish	to	make	

some	supplemental	income	to	help	with	the	monthly	bills.		

I	am	in	the	process	of	starting	a	video	marketing	company	from	home	that	

incorporates	an	Unmanned	Aircraft	system	as	the	focal	selling	point	of	the	business.		

The	company	name	will	be	Aerial	PB,	and	I	will	be	using	a	DJI	Phantom	3	

Professional	aircraft	for aerial	photography	and	videography.		The	videos	and	

photos	will	be	sold	to	local	businesses	to	market	their	product	(i.e.	real	estate	videos	

of	listings).	

The	aircraft	will	be	kept	up	to	date	with	all	the	necessary	safety	inspections	on	a	

daily	basis	along	with	proper	education	for	the	pilot	and	software	updates	for	the	

aircraft.		Also,	the aircraft	will	not	reach	above	200	feet	on	any	particular	flight,	and	

property	safety	and	privacy	measures	will	be	maintained.	

Here	are	the	specifics	of	my	aircraft:

GENERAL FEATURES

 Epic Aerial Video

 Live HD View

 Complete Control

 Powerful Mobile App

 Vision Positioning

 Easy to Fly

 Worry-free Autopilot

 Intelligent Battery

 Supports Adobe DNG RAW

 Unmatched Propulsion

 SDK Development

VISION POSITIONING

 Max Velocity: Less than 8 m/s (when 2 m above ground)

 Altitude Range: 30 cm-300 cm

 Operating Range: 30 cm-300 cm</td></tr>

 Transmitter Power:CE: 25mw; FCC: 100mw

 Operating Environment: Surface with clear pattern and adequate lighting (Lux > 15)

CAMERA

 Sensor: Sony EXMOR 1/2.3” Effective pixels: 12.4 M (total pixels: 12.76 M)
 Lens: FOV 94° 20 mm (35 mm format equivalent) f/2.8, focus at ∞

 ISO Range:100-3200 (video) 100-1600 (photo)

 Max Bitrate Of Video Storage: 60 Mbps

 Operating Temperature: 0°C to 40°C

REMOTE CONTROLLER

 Operating Frequency: 2.400 GHz-2.483 GHz

 Max Distance: 2000m (outdoors and unobstructed)

 Receiver Sensitivity (1%PER): -101 dBm ±2 dBm

 Transmitter Power (EIRP): FCC: 20 dBm CE: 16 dBm

 Working Voltage: 1.2 A @7.4 V

DJI VISION APP

 EIRP: 100mW

 Live View Working Frequency: 2.4GHz ISM

 Live View Quality:720P @ 30fps (depending on conditions and mobile device)

 Required Operating Systems:iOS 8.0 or later, Android 4.1.2 or later

 Recommended Devices: iOS: iPhone 5s, iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus, iPad Air, iPad Air Wi-Fi + 

Cellular, iPad mini 2, iPad mini 2 Wi-Fi + Cellular, iPad Air 2, iPad Air 2 Wi-Fi + Cellular, iPad mini 

3, and iPad mini 3 Wi-Fi + Cellular. This app is optimized for iPhone 5s, iPhone 6, and iPhone 6 

Plus Android: Samsung S5, Note 3, Sony Xperia Z3, Google Nexus 7 II, Google Nexus 9, Mi 3, 

Nubia Z7 mini

This	aircraft	will	not	operate	in,	or	around,	an	airport.		Line	of	sight	will	be	always	

be	key	in	operation.

Thank	you	for	your	time,	and	I	hope	this	helps	in	the	process	of	offering	an	

exemption	for	my	business.

Chris	Smith

AerialPB

Poplar	Bluff,	MO

63901
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1998
<CASH>                                         3,301
<SECURITIES>                                     723  
<RECEIVABLES>                                     60  
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   0  
<PP&E>                                             0  
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                23,059
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              0
<BONDS>                                          719
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                         365
<OTHER-SE>                                    20,375
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  23,059
<SALES>                                        1,619
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,652
<CGS>                                            349
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    349
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,010
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                25
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,268
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,268
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,268
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .31
        

</TABLE>
#### COM. v. HEARD, J.

2119 EDA 2015

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

9/7/2017

Reargument Denied 11/2/2017

CP-51-CR-0012234-2014

(Philadelphia)

Affirmed/Vacated/Remanded
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 311

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 27, 1998

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Honoring the memory of Detective John Michael Gibson

and Private First Class Jacob Joseph Chestnut of the

United States Capitol Police for their selfless acts of

heroism at the United States Capitol on July 24, 1998.

Whereas the Capitol is the people’s house, and, as such, it

has always been and will remain open to the public;

Whereas millions of people visit the Capitol each year to observe and study the workings of the democratic process;

Whereas the Capitol is the most recognizable symbol of liberty and democracy throughout the world and those who

guard the Capitol guard our freedom;
2

HCON 311 RDS

Whereas Private First Class Jacob ‘‘J.J.’’ Chestnut and Detective John Michael Gibson sacrificed their lives to protect the lives of hundreds of tourists, staff, and Members

of Congress;

Whereas if not for the quick and courageous action of those

officers, many innocent people would likely have been injured or killed;

Whereas through their selfless acts, Detective Gibson and

Private First Class Chestnut underscored the courage,

honor, and dedication shown daily by every member of

the United States Capitol Police and every law enforcement officer;

Whereas Private First Class Chestnut, a Vietnam veteran

who spent 20 years in the Air Force, was an 18-year veteran of the Capitol Police, and was married to Wen Ling

and had five children, Joseph, Janece, Janet, Karen, and

William;

Whereas Detective Gibson, assigned as Representative Tom

DeLay’s bodyguard for the last three years, was an 18-

year veteran of the Capitol Police, and was married to

Evelyn and had three children, Kristen, John, and Daniel;

Whereas Private First Class Chestnut and Detective Gibson

were the first United States Capitol Police officers ever

killed in the line of duty;

Whereas Private First Class Chestnut and Detective Gibson,

and all those who helped apprehend the gunman, assist

the injured, and evacuate the building, are true heroes of

democracy, and every American owes them a deep debt

of gratitude: Now, therefore, be it
3

HCON 311 RDS

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) Congress hereby honors the memory of De4 tective John Michael Gibson and Private First Class

5 Jacob Joseph Chestnut of the United States Capitol

6 Police for the selfless acts of heroism they displayed

7 on July 24, 1998, in sacrificing their lives in the line

8 of duty so that others might live; and

9 (2) when the House of Representatives adjourns

10 on this date and when the Senate adjourns or re11 cesses on this date, they shall do so out of respect

12 to the memory of Detective John Michael Gibson

13 and Private First Class Jacob Joseph Chestnut.

Passed the House of Representatives July 27, 1998.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

IN RE: APPOINTMENT TO DOMESTIC RELATIONS PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE : : : : : No. 615 CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES

**O R D E R**
**PER CURIA M:** 

AND NOW , this 17 th day of February , 201 5 , Lucille Marsh , Esquire, Lackawanna County, is hereby appointed as a member of the Domestic Relations Procedural Rules Committee for a term of three years commencing March 1 , 2015.
#### Harsimran SINGH, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 15-71739

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 5, 2017 * San Francisco, California

Filed December 7, 2017

*637Babak Pourtavoosi, Babak Pourtavoosi, Jackson Heights, NY, for Petitioner

Leslie McKay, Esquire, Assistant Director, Anthony W. Norwood, Senior Litigation Counsel, OIL, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: KOZINSKI and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and KEELEY,** District Judge.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is *637suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Irene M. Keeley, United States District Judge for the U.S, District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Harsimran Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion, *Mohammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005), and deny the petition for review.

1. Singh sought adjustment of status and cancellation of removal under the Violence Against Women Act special rule to removal proceedings. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(2). This special rule allows the filing of motions to reopen within one year of the entry of a final order of removal. *Id.*§ 1229a(c)(7)(C)(iv). But, “the Attorney General may, in the Attorney General’s discretion, waive this time limitation in the case of an alien who demonstrates extraordinary circumstances or extreme hardship to the alien’s • child.” *Id.*§ 1229a(c)(7)(C)(iv)(III).

2. Singh filed his motion to reopen more than ten years after the entry of his final order of removal, and the BIA did not abuse its discretion in concluding that the motion failed to establish either the extraordinary circumstances or extreme hardship to Singh’s child required by § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(iv)(III).

DENIED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The Honorable Robert E. Cowen, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Third Circuit, sitting by designation. NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LORENZO LEDEZMA-SANDOVAL, Petitioner,
v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 05-77082 Agency No. A017-985-714
MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted December 4, 2006 San Francisco, California Before: D.W. NELSON and BERZON, Circuit Judges, and COWEN, Judge. **
Lorenzo Ledezma-Sandoval petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing hi s appeal of a final order of removal. 

# FILED
APR 02 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 The BIA erred in holding that Ledezm a was removable as an aggravated felon by reason of his conviction for second-degree murder in 1981 because “8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) [providing that an alien convicted of an aggravated felony is deportable] does not apply to convictions . . . that occurred prior to November 18, 1988.” Ledezma-Galicia v. Holder , No. 03-73648, 2010 WL 1172469, at *16 (9th Cir. Mar. 29, 2010). Because we hold that the 1981 conviction cannot serve as a basis for removal, we do not reach Ledezma’s alternative arguments regarding his eligibility for a waiver of that ground of removal. We grant the petition and remand to the BIA for further proceedings. PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.
#### Kenneth GIBSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donnie HARRISON, Wake County Sheriff; Officer K. Meyer, Wake County Detention Center; Dr. Umesi; Major P. Williams, Wake County Detention Center; Assistant Director Higdon, Wake County Detention Center; D. Bowen; Wake County Sheriff Department, Defendants-Appellees, and State of North Carolina; Wake County Detention Center, Defendants.

No. 17-7297

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 30, 2018

Decided: February 2, 2018

Kenneth Gibson, Appellant Pro Se. John Albert Maxfield, WAKE COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*176PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Gibson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Gibson v. Harrison,*No. 5:15-ct-03055-FL, 2017 WL 4126980 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 18, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 113 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                             H. J. RES. 113

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 Approving the location of a Martin Luther King, Jr., Memorial in the 
                           Nation's Capital.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 113

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Approving the location of a Martin Luther King, Jr., Memorial in the 
                           Nation's Capital.

Whereas section 508 of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 
        (40 U.S.C. 1003 note; 110 Stat. 4157) authorized the Alpha Phi Alpha 
        Fraternity to establish a memorial on Federal land in the District of 
        Columbia to honor Martin Luther King, Jr.;
Whereas section 6(a) of the Commemorative Works Act (40 U.S.C. 1006(a)) provides 
        that the location of a commemorative work in the area described as Area 
        I (within the meaning of the Act) shall be deemed not authorized unless 
        approved by law not later than 150 days after notification to Congress 
        that the Secretary of the Interior recommends location of the 
        commemorative work in Area I; and
Whereas the Secretary of the Interior has notified Congress of the 
        recommendation of the Secretary that the memorial be located in Area I: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR., MEMORIAL.

    The location of the commemorative work to honor Martin Luther King, 
Jr., authorized by section 508 of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands 
Management Act of 1996 (40 U.S.C. 1003 note; 110 Stat. 4157), within 
Area I is approved under section 6(a) of the Commemorative Works Act 
(40 U.S.C. 1006(a)).

            Passed the House of Representatives June 22, 1998.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 311

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Honoring the memory of Detective John Michael

Capitol on July 24, 1998.their selfless acts of heroism at the United StatesChestnut of the United States Capitol Police forGibson and Private First Class Jacob Joseph
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 311

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the Capitol is the people’s house, and, as such, it

has always been and will remain open to the public;

Whereas millions of people visit the Capitol each year to observe and study the workings of the democratic process;

Whereas the Capitol is the most recognizable symbol of liberty and democracy throughout the world and those who

guard the Capitol guard our freedom;
2

•HCON 311 EH

Whereas Private First Class Jacob ‘‘J.J.’’ Chestnut and Detective John Michael Gibson sacrificed their lives to protect the lives of hundreds of tourists, staff, and Members

of Congress;

Whereas if not for the quick and courageous action of those

officers, many innocent people would likely have been injured or killed;

Whereas through their selfless acts, Detective Gibson and

Private First Class Chestnut underscored the courage,

honor, and dedication shown daily by every member of

the United States Capitol Police and every law enforcement officer;

Whereas Private First Class Chestnut, a Vietnam veteran

who spent 20 years in the Air Force, was an 18-year veteran of the Capitol Police, and was married to Wen Ling

and had five children, Joseph, Janece, Janet, Karen, and

William;

Whereas Detective Gibson, assigned as Representative Tom

DeLay’s bodyguard for the last three years, was an 18-

year veteran of the Capitol Police, and was married to

Evelyn and had three children, Kristen, John, and Daniel;

Whereas Private First Class Chestnut and Detective Gibson

were the first United States Capitol Police officers ever

killed in the line of duty;

Whereas Private First Class Chestnut and Detective Gibson,

and all those who helped apprehend the gunman, assist

the injured, and evacuate the building, are true heroes of

democracy, and every American owes them a deep debt

of gratitude: Now, therefore, be it
3

•HCON 311 EH

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) Congress hereby honors the memory of De4 tective John Michael Gibson and Private First Class

5 Jacob Joseph Chestnut of the United States Capitol

6 Police for the selfless acts of heroism they displayed

7 on July 24, 1998, in sacrificing their lives in the line

8 of duty so that others might live; and

9 (2) when the House of Representatives adjourns

10 on this date and when the Senate adjourns or re11 cesses on this date, they shall do so out of respect

12 to the memory of Detective John Michael Gibson

13 and Private First Class Jacob Joseph Chestnut.

Passed the House of Representatives July 27, 1998.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Bay Resources Ltd.
(the "Company") for the three months ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), the
undersigned, Joseph Gutnick, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


February 11, 2005

                             /S/ Joseph I. Gutnick
                             ------------------------------------
                             Joseph I. Gutnick
                             Chairman of the Board, President and
                             Chief Executive Officer




<PAGE>
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 17-1576

___________________________

Julia Mejia Cerritos,

lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner,

v.

Jefferson B. Sessions, III, Attorney General of the United States,

lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent.

____________

Petition for Review of an Order of the

 Board of Immigration Appeals

____________

 Submitted: December 15, 2017

Filed: December 21, 2017

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Salvadoran Julia Mejia Cerritos sought asylum for herself and her two minor

children based on her membership in a particular social group. Before the agency,

she identified the asserted social group as “El Salvadorans who report criminal

activity of the MS-13 gang,” “witnesses to gang violence who report the crime or

retribution to the police,” or “El Salvadorans who witness gang criminal activities and
face retaliation.” An immigration judge (IJ) denied her request for asylum, and the

Board of Immigration Appeals dismissed her appeal. Mejia Cerritos petitions for

review, contending that one or more of her proposed groups qualify as a social group

for purposes of asylum relief.

We conclude thatsubstantial evidence supportsthe finding that Mejia Cerritos

failed to show past persecution in El Salvador, or a well-founded fear of future

persecution there, due to membership in a particular social group. See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1158(b)(1)(B)(i). The proposed groups in which Mejia Cerritos and her children

assert membership are not cognizable particular social groups for purposes of

immigration relief. Mejia Cerritos did not demonstrate that Salvadoran society

recognized any of her proposed groups as unique, and did not otherwise present

evidence to support the conclusion that having witnessed and reported criminal gang

activity would satisfy the particularity or social distinction factors the BIA considers

when evaluating the cognizability of in a particular social group. See Juarez Chilel

v. Holder, 779 F.3d 850, 854-55 (8th Cir. 2015). The petition for review is therefore

denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-