alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          1,514,858
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     615,973
<ALLOWANCES>                                       13,300
<INVENTORY>                                       136,479
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                2,511,976
<PP&E>                                         11,302,237
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,254,621
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 53,808,947
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          15,570,541
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             821,234
<PREFERRED>                                            36
<COMMON>                                           35,915
<OTHER-SE>                                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   53,808,947
<SALES>                                         2,140,614
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                2,140,614
<CGS>                                             704,938
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   6,744,356
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                1,465,252
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,212,795
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,068,994)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,068,994)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,068,994)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.16)


</TABLE>
No. 11-1337.

#### Sioux Honey Assn. et al. *v.*United States et al.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 190

To authorize the printing of a revised edition of the Senate Election Law

Guidebook.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 31, 1995

Mr. WARNER (for himself and Mr. FORD) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize the printing of a revised edition of the Senate

Election Law Guidebook.

1 Resolved, That the Committee on Rules and Adminis2 tration is directed to prepare a revised edition of the Sen3 ate Election Law Guidebook, Senate Document 103–13,

4 and that such document shall be printed as a Senate docu5 ment.

6 SEC. 2. There shall be printed 600 additional copies

7 of the document specified in section 1 of this resolution

8 for the use of the Committee on Rules and Administration.

Æ
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1990
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1990
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   187
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     187
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       187
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (63)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
(logo)CURCIO

+COHEN

  

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS PC 7 PENN PLAZA, SUITE 1500, NEW YORK NY 10001

TEL:212 557-9800 · FAX: 212 557-9819 · website: www.cwccpsfirm.com 

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  

Managing Member

Park Bridge Lender Services LLC

Montclair, NJ

  

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of 2015 Compliance by Park Bridge Lender Services LLC with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria (“Management’s Report”), that Park Bridge Lender Services LLC (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, excluding those criteria noted as not applicable (N/A) within Exhibit B to Management’s Report. The transactions covered by this report are only those transactions processed by the Company in its capacity as trust advisor or operating advisor for the asset backed securities transactions (the “Platform”) identified in Management’s Report. Reference Exhibit A to Management’s Report for the transactions covered by this examination. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, including examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of a selected sample of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria during the specified period. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our examination was not designed to detect material noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests, that may have affected the Company’s servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria identified in Exhibit B to Management’s Report with respect to the transactions identified in Exhibit A to Management’s Report as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, for the Platform, is fairly stated in all material aspects.

 

 /s/ Curcio & Cohen, CPA’S, P.C.

Curcio & Cohen, CPA’S, P.C.

New York, NY 

February 15, 2016

 

 

MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-12-00100-CV

SAMUEL CREGO

v.

GUILLERMO LASH & JOHN HOYSICK

On Appeal from the

404th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2010-DCL-3050-G

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

March 27, 2014
<PAGE>

                                   FORM 8-K

                      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                            Washington, D.C.  20549

                                CURRENT REPORT

    Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)      February 15, 2002
                                                  --------------------------


                                ACR Group, Inc.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


            Texas                      0-12490            74-2008473
-------------------------------   ----------------    ------------------
(State or other jurisdiction      (Commission File       (IRS Employer
      of incorporation)                Number)        Identification No.)

3200 Wilcrest, Suite 440, Houston, Texas                     77042
----------------------------------------             ----------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)                   (zip code)


Registrant's telephone number, including area code    (713) 780-8532
                                                   -----------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)


<PAGE>

Item 5.  Other Events.

  ACR Group, Inc. (the "Company") amended the loan agreement with its senior
lender to revise certain financial covenants, and obtained a waiver of all prior
Events of Default (as defined in the loan agreement) that existed as a result of
the Company's non-compliance with certain financial covenants as of August 31,
2001.

  The Company expects to be in compliance with all of the financial covenants of
the loan agreement at February 28, 2002, the end of its fiscal year, and during
its fiscal year ending February 28, 2003.


                                 SIGNATURES

  Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


                                   ACR GROUP, INC.


Dated:   February 15, 2002         By:     /s/ A. Stephen Trevino
        ---------------------           -------------------------------
                                          A. Stephen Trevino
                                          Vice President and Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
                                  
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         6,029
<SECURITIES>                                      43
<RECEIVABLES>                                    268
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   0
<PP&E>                                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                19,535
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              0
<BONDS>                                          805
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                         375
<OTHER-SE>                                    16,197
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  19,535
<SALES>                                        1,838
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,420
<CGS>                                            639
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    639
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,156
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                44 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,675
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,675 
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,675
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .42
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Stem Cell III.                    

*Date:*                         April 29, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         1:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Nijaguna Prasad, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway Bldg., Suite 2W200, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-9667                         *prasadnb@nia.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 30, 2022.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-07110 Filed 4-4-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
one847holdings_ex101.htm


EXHIBIT 10.1


 


 





 




  





 











  







 







  





-i-











  







 







  





-ii-











  







 





 




  





-1-











  







 





 




  





-2-











  







 





 




  





-3-











  






 





 




  





-4-











  








 





 




  





-5-











  







 





 




  





-6-











  







 





 




  





-7-











  







 





 




  





-8-











  







 





 




  





-9-











  







 





 




  





-10-











  







 





 




  





-11-











  







 




 




  





-12-











  






 




 




  





-13-











  






 




 




  





-14-











  






 




 




  





-15-











  






 




 




  





-16-











  






 




 




  





-17-











  






 




 




  





-18-











  






 




 




  





-19-











  






 




 




  





-20-











  






 






 




  





-21-











  






 






 




  





-22-











  






 





 




  





-23-











  






 





 




  





-24-











  






 





 




  





-25-











  






 


 



  





-26-
## IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

July 12, 2024 SC-2024-0267 Ex parte M.D.J. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS (In re: M.D.J. v. State of Alabama) (Jefferson Circuit Court: CC-20-2129; Criminal Appeals: CR-2023-0375).

CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT WHEREAS, the petition for writ of certiorari in the above referenced cause has been duly submitted and considered by the Supreme Court of Alabama and the judgment indicated below was entered in this cause on July 12, 2024: Writ Denied. No Opinion. Parker, C.J. -- Wise, Sellers, Stewart, and Cook, JJ., concur. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama
#### Mark A. VELASCO; Danika Velasco, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-35426

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted January 16, 2018 *

Filed January 19, 2018

Jill J. Smith, Esquire, Attorney, Natural Resource Law Group, PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants

. Abraham K. Lorber, Attorney, David' Christopher Spellman, Esquire, Attorney, Lane Powell PC, Seattle, WA, for Defendants-Appellees

Before: REINHARDT, TROTT, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument, See Fed. R. App, P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Mark A. Velasco and Danika Velasco appeal from the district court’s judgment dismissing their action alleging a Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”) claim for rescission. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). *Intri-Plex Techs., Inc. v. Crest Grp., Inc.,*499 F.3d 1048, 1052 (9th Cir. 2007). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the Velascos’ action as barred by the doctrine of res judicata because the Velascos alleged claims arising out of the same loan transaction against the same defendants in a prior state court action. *See Holcombe v. Hosmer,*477 F.3d 1094, 1097 (9th Cir. 2007) (federal courts must apply state law regarding res judicata to state court judgments); *Seattle-First Nat’l Bank v. Kawachi,*91 Wash.2d 223, 588 P.2d 725, 727 (1978) (en banc) (elements of res judicata under Washington state law); *Kelly-Hansen v. Kelly-Hansen,*87 Wash.App. 320, 941 P.2d 1108, 1112 (1997) (doctrine of res judicata bars litigation of claims that could have been raised in the prior action). We reject as meritless the Velascos’ argument that they could not have raised a TILA claim in their prior state court action.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<CIK> 0000815555
<NAME> NATIONAL INFORMATION GROUP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            12,727
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       5,523
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  22,742
<CASH>                                           1,794
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           2,446
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  67,526
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                  3,155
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                              5,622
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 11,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,276
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,410
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    67,526
<PREMIUMS>                                       9,421
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                889
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  22,313
<BENEFITS>                                       3,563
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      3,949
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            23,610
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,501
<INCOME-TAX>                                       485
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,016
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,016
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                   3,232
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                              3,958
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                (396)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               1,716
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 1,923
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                  3,155
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                          (396)
        

</TABLE>
No. 11-9696.

#### Lewellyn et vir, on Behalf of J. L. et al. *v.*Sarasota County School Board.

C. A. 11th Cir. Motion of petitioners for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *informa pauperis*[567 U. S. 904] denied.