Cite as 2017 Ark. App. 403 

## ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION II No. CR -16- 1109 JERMAINE C. HESTER APPELLANT
V. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE Opinion Delivered: June 21 , 2017
APPEAL FROM THE CRITTENDEN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 18 CR

- 14

- 183 ]
HONORABLE RANDY PHILHOURS , JUDGE AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED
WAYMOND M. BROWN , Judge Appellant appeals from the circuit court’s order revoking his probation. Appellant’s counsel has filed a no -merit brief and a motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California 1 and Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4

- 3(k), 2 stating that there are no meritorious grounds to support an appeal. The clerk mailed a certified copy of counsel’s motion and brief to appellant, informing him of his right to file pro se points for reversal. Appellant has f a iled to file pro se points for reversal. We affirm appellant’s revocation and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. On March 11, 2 014, appellant was char ged by i nformation, in case No. CR

- 2014

- 183 , with four counts of residential burglary, a Class “B” felony ; one count of theft of

1 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

2 (2011).Cite as 2017 Ark. App. 403

2 property, a Class “B ” felony; one count of theft of property, a Class “C ” felony; one count of theft of property, a Class “D” felony; and one count of theft of property, a Class “A”
mi sdemeanor. On May 6, 2015, a ppellant e ntered into a negotiated plea of o ne count of residential burgl ary and one count of theft of property, a Class “B” felony, and was sentenced to five years ’ probation on the burglary charge and five years’ suspended imposition of

sentence (SIS) on the theft charge. Appellant signed “Conditions of Suspended Sentence or Probation,” wherein he agreed, among other things, to “.

. . pay all fines, court costs, and
restitution

. . . live a law

- abiding life

. . . not use mari juana

. . . have no firearm in his possession

. . . [and] cooperate with Probation O fficer and report to him/her as directed [.] ” On March 31, 2016, the appellee filed a petition to revoke appellant’s probation. Th e petition alleged that appellant had violated his probation by (1) fail ing to pay fines, c osts and fees as directed; (2) fail ing to report to probation as directed; (3) fail ing to notify the sheriff and probation of his current address and employment; (4) fail ing to live a law -abiding life, be of good behavior, and not violate any state, feder al, or municipal law; (5) testing positive for marijuan a on July 23, 2015, and admitting to smoking marijuana on February 12, 2016; and (6) committin g the new offense of possession of firearm on school property in case number CR

- 2016

- 265 on March 17, 2016. At appellant’s revocation hearing, the county collector testified that appellant was ordered to begin making fifty

- dollar payment s on June 4, 2015, but had n ot made a single payment and ha d not called her to discuss his court

- ordered payments. Appellant’s probation officer testified that she went over the conditions of appellant’s probation with him; those conditions required that he report to his probation officer as directed

. She testified thatCite as 2017 Ark. App. 403

3 appellant knew her phone numbe r and that he should call if h e was having a problem making an appointment ; he never called

. Appellant’s probation officer stated that appellant’s reporting had been “kind of rocky[,]” noting that he had initially stopped reporting on August 20, 2015 , only to report again on October 13 and 23, 2015, after which he again stopped reporting

. 3 His reporting continued in this manner of missing appointments and then showing for one or two appointments only to miss appointments again. Appellant failed to report to a drug counseling assessment; 4 failed to report to two appointment s with a drug counselor, though “he’d asked from [sic] help with marijuana use”; failed to report to his probation officer “at least five times”; tested positive for marijuana on May 6 and July 23, 2015; admitted
mari juana use a week prior to reporting on February 12, 2016; and was arrested for possession of a handgun by a minor, which he admitted having

. 5
A fter his probation officer’s testimony, appellant’s hearing was continued for two days; he failed to appear at the opening of the hearing

. 6 Appellant’s counsel advised the circuit court that he had spoken with appellant on the day before trial and had the

3 He also reported in January 2016.

4 He reported thirty minutes late for a Fe bruary 16, 2016 drug counseling assessment but was not seen because he had missed more than half of the hour allotted for the assessment.

5 Appellant reported the arrest to his probation officer. The probation officer did not put the arrest in her violation report though she did not remember why she failed to do so ; appellant had claimed he was “trying to protect, so to speak[.]”

6 Appellant arrived at the hearing while testimony was being given.Cite as 2017 Ark. App. 403

4 understanding that appellant would be in court; he knew of no calamity having befallen appellant. He asked for a continuance; the motion was denied. Officer Kevin Davon Jordon, Sr., a school resource officer with the West Memphis Police Department, testified to being notified by a high school assistant principal that he had overheard a student questioning appellant about a gun in his backpack. Appellant ended up in the assistant principal’s office , where Jordon made contact with him; asked to search his backpac k, to which appellant consented; and found a .380 handgun inside the backpack along with appellant ’ s books

. 7 Appellant initially denied knowing the gun was in the backpack, but eventually admitte d that he had brought the gun because ano ther stud ent had threatened him; Jordon “never found anything to prove [appellant] was telling the truth.” Detective Martin Gill, also of the West Memphis Poli ce Department, testified regarding his interview of appellant, a video of which was played in open court. Gill stated that appellant told him the event happened “down the street from the school, which is a well

- travelled area” yet Gill never found any witnesses for the alleged event. After Gill’s testimony, appellant moved for a directed ver dict asserting that there was no proof of delivery or receipt of the probation officer’s appointment cards to support failure

to report to probation as directed; there was no testimony to support failure to notify probation of his current address and employment; there was no evidence that appellant used marijuana during the term of his supervision to support a violation for using an illegal drug ; and there was no evidence to establish that appellant purposely, knowingly, or recklessly

7 There was no magazine or rounds in the gun or the backpack.Cite as 2017 Ark. App. 403

5 failed to live a law

- abiding life

— though he admitted that the statute is silent to the mental state required. 8 The motion for directed verdict was denied on all counts except failure to provide proof of employment

. Thereafter, a ppellant testified to paying his fines by mail on the day prior to giving his t estimony. He denied having left the address he gave when he was first put on probation.
He asserted that he did not know the gun was in his backpack

— in corroboration with his mother’s testimony that she hid the gun there without appellant’ s knowledge

— but stated that he told police he did know about the gun because he was afraid of getting his mother in trouble. He admitted knowing his probation officer’s number and that he was to call if he could not report, and admitted that he only called once out of the fiv e times he failed to report. Finally, he stated that he makes $400 a week working with his father. Following appellant’s testimony, the circuit court found that it “[could not] believe anything” appellant told it and found that he had violated his probation by failing to pay anything on his fines, failing to report regularly, testing positive for the use of marijuana, being in possession of a firearm on school property, and being a felon in possession of a firearm. Appellant was sentenced to four years’ imprisonment in the Arkansas Department of Correction . This timely appeal followed. In compliance with Anders and Rule 4

- 3(k), counsel ordered the entire record and found that after a conscientious review of the record, there are no issues of arguable merit

8 His directed verdict motion did not include appellant’s failure to pay fines, costs, and fees, which he “[didn’t] believe” would be a “proper motion at [that] time.” He also did not think it proper to move for directed verdict on appellant’s admission to using marijuana on February 12, 2016.Cite as 2017 Ark. App. 403

6 for appeal. Counsel’s brief adequately covered each ac tion that was adverse to appellant below , including the revocation . After carefully examining the record and the brief presented to us, we find that counsel has complied with the requirements established by the Arkansas Supreme Court for no

- merit appeals i n criminal cases and conclude that the appeal is wholly without merit. Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.
H ARRISON and V AUGHT , JJ., agree. Tyler C. Ginn , for appellant. No response.