alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### IN RE: Capt. James LINLOR, Petitioner.

No. 18-1225

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 2, 2018

Decided: March 2, 2018

James Linlor, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

This case comes before the court on a petition for writ of mandamus filed under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771 (“CVRA”). The CVRA applies to crime victims and defines “crime victim” as “a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense' or an offense in the District of Columbia.” 18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)(2)(A). A crime victim is entitled to reasonable protection from the accused, to notice of court proceedings, to participation in court proceedings, to confer with government counsel, to receive restitution, to proceedings free from unreasonable delay, and to be treated with fairness. 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a). These rights must be asserted in the district court and, if the district court denies relief, the movant may petition the court of appeals for a writ of mandamuB. 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(3). If such a petition is filed, “[t]he court of appeals shall take up and decide such application forthwith within 72 hours after the petition has been filed.” *Id.*If the court of appeals denies the relief sought, “the reasons for the denial shall be clearly stated on the record in a written opinion.” *Id.*

Petitioner maintains that he is entitled to relief under the CVRA as the victim of a felony sexual battery, committed in violation of Va. Code § 18.2-67.3 & 18.2-67.10, during a Transportation Security Administration (TSA) pat-down at Dulles airport, in Loudoun County, Virginia. Petitioner alleges that he effected a common-law arrest of the TSA screener in accordance with Virginia law but that Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority police, the Loudoun County Sheriff, and the Loudoun County Magistrate refused to accept custody, book the arrest, or conduct a probable cause hearing. Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to: (1) compel the Loudoun County Sheriff to take his suspect into custody, book him, and transport him to a Loudoun County Magistrate and (2) compel the Loudoun County Magistrate to conduct a probable cause hearing which petitioner is entitled to attend under the CVRA.

Because petitioner alleges that he is the victim of a state offense, not “a Federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia,” he has not alleged that he is a “crime victim” within the meaning of the CVRA. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)(2)(A). This court has jurisdiction to enforce the protections of the CVRA through mandamus review of a district judge’s denial of those protections. The Act does not, however, give the court authority over state criminal prosecutions or mandamus jurisdiction over state or local officials. Petitioner has failed to assert the violation of any rights protected by the CVRA. His petition is, accordingly, dismissed,

*DISMISSED*
From: "Barbanell, Melissa (Salt Lake City)"

<mbarbanell@barrick.com> To: "Branscome, Marvin R." < marvin@rti.org > Cc: < klewis@airsci.com >, Chuck French/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Raymond, Gabrielle" < graymond@rti.org > Date: 01/06/2010 03:59 PM Subject: RE: Goldstrike Data Marvin and Chuck, I believe the ch art included herein give you the data you are looking for. There may be minor changes but we have passed this by the process folks at Goldstrike and they have indicated that these "should be final numbers".

--- --------- | 2009 Operating Data for | | Barrick Goldstrike | |

------------------------------------------- + ------------ | | | | | |

-------- ----------------- + ----------------- + ------------ | |Source | Tons | Hours | |

------------------------- + ----------------- + ------------ | |Roaster Mill #1 | 2,495,594 | 7754.0 | |

------------------------- + -- --------------- + ------------ | |Roaster Mill #2 | 2,404,814 | 7855 | |

------------------------- + ----------------- + ------------ | |Roaster #1 | 2,897,993 | 7851 | |

------------------------- + ----------------- + ---- -------- | |Roaster #2 | 2,593,217 | 7876 | |

------------------------- + ----------------- + ------------ | |Carbon Kiln | 12,701 | 7527 | |

------------------------- + ----------------- + ------------ | |Autoclave #1 | 525,081 | 5457 | |

------------------------- + ----------------- + ------------ | |Autoclave #2 | 942,020 | 7887 | |

------------------------- + ----------------- + ------------ | |Autoclave #3 | 739,015 | 6449 | |

------------------------- + ----------------- + ------------ | |Autoclave #4 | 832,148 | 5679 | |

------------------------- + ----------------- + ------------ | |Autoclave #5 | 882,657 | 7 486 | |

------------------------- + ----------------- + ------------ | |Autoclave #6 | 918,632 | 7954 | |

------------------------- + ----------------- + ------------ | |Retort #1 | 32.0 | 1858 | |

---------- --------------- + ----------------- + ------------ | |Retort #2 | 35.7 | 2154 | |

------------------------- + ----------------- + ------------ | |Retort #3 | 30.1 | 1856 | |

------------------------- + ---- ------------- + ------------ | |East Furnace | 41.0 | 442 | |

------------------------- + ----------------- + ------------ | |West Furnace | 41.0 | 430 | |

------------------------- + ----------------- + ------ ------ | Please let me know if you have any questions. Melissa
Exhibit 99.1





GOLUB CAPITAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION





PRIVACY POLICY





To Golub Capital Investment Corporation Investors:





We take precautions to maintain the privacy of personal information concerning our investors. These precautions include the adoption of certain procedures designed to maintain and secure your nonpublic personal information from inappropriate disclosure to unaffiliated third parties. We are sending this notice in accordance with applicable federal regulations. This notice applies to investors in Golub Capital Investment Corporation (the “Company”).





What kind of personal information do we have about you and where did we get it?





We collect nonpublic personal information about you from the following sources:





|  |                                                                                                        
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|• | Information we may receive from you in subscription agreements or other related documents or forms; and

|  |                                                                
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|• | Information about your transactions with our affiliates and us.




How do we protect your personal information?





We do not disclose any nonpublic personal information about our investors or former investors to anyone, except as permitted by law.





We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees and agents of GC Advisers LLC, its affiliates and unaffiliated third party service providers (which may include a custodian, transfer agent or financial printer) who need to know that information in order to provide services to you or to the Company. In that regard, we note that we maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal standards to safeguard your nonpublic personal information and which we believe is adequate to prevent unauthorized disclosure of such information.





What do we do with personal information about our former investors?





If an investor decides to no longer do business with us, we will continue to follow this privacy policy with respect to the information we have in our possession about such investor and his/her account.





If you have any questions concerning our privacy policies, please contact our Chief Financial Officer, Ross Teune, at (312) 284-0111.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The
undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of American Education Center Inc. (the “Company”), for
the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of his knowledge:



(1)  The Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018,
(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and



(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



Date: November 1,
2019



|/s/ Max P. Chen                                                                                | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                                                               | 
|Max P. Chen                                                                                    | 
|President, Sole Director, Chief Executive Officer, and Secretary (Principal Executive Officer) | 



A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to American Education Center Inc. and will be retained by American
Education Center Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.36

SailPoint Technologies Holdings, Inc.Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation

This document summarizes the non-employee director compensation policy of SailPoint Technologies Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) effective November 21, 2017, but subject to revision from time to time by the Board or its Compensation Committee.  

The non-employee members of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of SailPoint Technologies Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) will be entitled to receive the following compensation during each year of service as a director:

 

| Annual cash retainer                                                                                |   | $ | 30,000  |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---|---------|--------|
| Additional annual cash retainer for the Chairman of the Board                                       |   | $ | 20,000  |   |
| Additional annual cash retainer for Chairman of the Audit Committee                                 |   | $ | 20,000  |   |
| Additional cash retainer for members of the Audit Committee                                         |   | $ | 10,000  |   |
| Additional cash retainer for the Chairman of the Compensation Committee                             |   | $ | 12,000  |   |
| Additional annual cash retainer for members of the Compensation Committee                           |   | $ | 6,000   |   |
| Additional annual cash retainer for Chairman of the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee |   | $ | 7,500   |   |
| Additional cash retainer for members of the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee         |   | $ | 3,750   |   |
| Annual equity retainer of restricted stock units                                                    |   | $ | 170,000 |   |

 

The cash retainer and committee and chairmanship fees are payable in cash on a quarterly basis.  Annual amounts are subject to pro ration for partial years of service.
#### CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Appellant v. ARISTA NETWORKS, INC., Appellee

2017-2384

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

February 14, 2018

John C. 0 Quinn, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by Calvin Alexander Shank, Jason M. Wilcox.

Matthew D. Powers, Tensegrity Law Group, LLP, Redwood City, CA argued for appellee. Aso represented by William P. Nelson; Lauren Ann Degnan, Christopher Dryer, Michael J. Mckeon, Ralph Adam Phillips, Andrew L. Schrader, Fish *&*Richardson, PC, Washington, DC; Steven Katz, Boston, MA.

(Prost, Chief Judge, Schall and Chen, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and' considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

J.R. MCFARLANE, M.C. HOLIFIELD, D.A. NORKIN

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

ROBERT C. MORIARTY

ELECTRONICS TECHNICIAN FIRST CLASS (E-6), U.S. NAVY

NMCCA 201400182

SPECIAL COURT-MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 4 March 2014.

Military Judge: Col D.J. Daugherty, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commandant, Naval District Washington, 

Washington Navy Yard, Washington, DC.

Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: LCDR J.D. Pilling, 

JAGC, USN.

For Appellant: CAPT Charles D. Stimson, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian K. Keller, Esq.

14 August 2014

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT 

---------------------------------------------------

 After careful consideration of the record, submitted 

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence 

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform 

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

 

For the Court

 

 

 

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
exh_1071.htm



Exhibit 10.7.1


 




Sterling Construction Company, Inc.


20810 Fernbush Lane


Houston, Texas 77073


 


January 18, 2012


Roger M. Barzun


P.O. Box 767


Concord, Massachusetts 01742


 


Dear Roger,


 


The purpose of this letter is to confirm that you and Sterling have agreed to amend as of the date set forth above your employment agreement with Sterling dated as of March 17, 2006 by restating in its entirety the first bulleted paragraph under the paragraph entitled "Without Cause, including by reason of Death or Permanent Disability:" which appears on page 2 under the heading "Termination:" to read as follows:


 



	
  

	
"•

	
Pay to you your Salary then in effect in at least bi-weekly installments for a period of twelve (12) full calendar months following the effective date of the termination of your employment."







 


In all other respects, your employment agreement will remain as originally written.


 


If the foregoing accurately sets forth our agreement on the matters covered, please signify your agreement by signing this letter in the space provided below and returning the signed copy to me and to the Human Resources Department.


 


Very truly yours,


 



	/s/ Patrick T. Manning	 
	
Patrick T. Manning


Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

	 
	
 


 


Accepted and Agreed:


 


 

	 
	/s/ Roger M. Barzun 	 
	 
Roger M. Barzun
Exhibit 10.1.2


 


Amendment
to the 2003 Stock Option Plan


 


This
Amendment, dated as of March 12, 2014 (this “Amendment”),
is to the Everyday Health, Inc. 2003 Stock Option Plan, as amended (the “Plan”).
Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the
meanings ascribed to them in the Plan.


 


WITNESSETH


 


Whereas,
the Company established the Plan to attract the best available talent and encourage the highest level of performance;


 


Whereas,
Section 19 of the Plan provides that the Plan may be amended by Board and the Company’s stockholders at any time and from
time to time; and


 


Whereas,
the Board and the Company’s stockholders wish to amend Section 5 of the Plan to provide for an increase in the number
of shares of the Company’s Common Stock that is reserved for issuance thereunder from 9,850,000 to 11,850,000.


 


Now,
Therefore, Be It Resolved, that the number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock that is reserved for issuance
in accordance with the Plan be, and it hereby is, increased from 9,850,000 to 11,850,000 by replacing the phrase “Nine Million
Eight Hundred Fifty Thousand (9,850,000)” in the first sentence of Section 5 of the 2003 Stock Option Plan with the phrase
“Eleven Million Eight Hundred Fifty Thousand (11,850,000).” Except as specifically provided herein, the Plan remains
in full force and effect unmodified hereby.


 


In
witness whereof, the undersigned has executed this Amendment as the date first written above.


 


	EVERYDAY HEALTH, INC.
	 
	By: 	/s/ Alan Shapiro
	 	Name: 	Alan Shapiro
	 	Title:	Executive Vice President & General Counsel
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 21
                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                                           State of
Name of Corporation                     Incorporation
-------------------                     -------------
SPIAPT, Inc.                                 Alabama
SPICOM, Inc.                                 Alabama
SPIMALL, Inc.                                Alabama
SPITON, Inc.                                 Alabama
SPITOWN Corporation                          Delaware
SPILAF, Inc.                                 Alabama
SPINAP, Inc.                                 Delaware
SPIBILE, Inc.                                Alabama
SPICLIFF, Inc.                               Delaware
SPILAKE, Inc.                                Delaware
Clearwater Acquisition Corp.                 Delaware
Lafayette Acquisition Corp.                  Louisiana
SPIDELA, Inc.                                Delaware
Slidell Acquisition Corp.                    Delaware
SPIANTONIO, Inc.                             Delaware
SPINELLON, Inc.                              Delaware
SPIPAL, Inc.                                 Delaware
SPIWACHEE, Inc.                              Delaware
FAGALA Corp.                                 Louisiana
SPILAN, Inc.                                 Delaware
SPIWARD, Inc.                                Delaware
DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY
2800 DEFENSE PENTAGON
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20301-2800

OST 2 7 072
MEMORANDUM FOR DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY WORKFORCE

SUBJECT: FY23 Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Harassment and Discrimination Policy
Statement

The Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) is committed to ensuring all members
of our workforce are treated with dignity and respect, while promoting a work environment that is
free from sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination. Harassment and discrimination
based on sexual orientation or gender identity! is prohibited. Senior leaders, supervisors, and
managers are expected to model appropriate leadership behavior, set an example for all members
of our workforce, and make clear that discrimination based upon sexual orientation or gender
identity is not acceptable.

Employees should immediately report all incidents of harassment based on sexual
orientation or gender identity, observed or personally experienced, to their supervisory chain and/or
our Talent Management (TM) Directorate. Upon becoming aware that an employee is being
harassed, managers and supervisors will take prompt, appropriate action to stop the harassment and
will immediately report all allegations of harassment to TM. Retaliation will not be tolerated against
any employee for reporting harassment.

Employees who believe they have been discriminated against based upon gender identity
and/or sexual orientation may contact an Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Counselor to file
a discrimination complaint through the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) EEO & Diversity
Office? by email at HQEEOInquiries@dla.mil or by phone at 571-767-6777. Employees should
contact a DLA EEO Counselor within 45 calendar days from the date of the alleged discriminatory
act.

DSCA will sustain a culture and climate in which every employee is safe, supported, and
granted an equal opportunity to contribute to the success of the Agency's mission. Collectively, we
share the responsibility to promote a dignified and inclusive workplace where our team members
are resilient, valued, and ready to respond to emerging challenges in Security Cooperation.

/ James A. Hursch

Director

' "Sexual orientation" refers to one's emotional or physical attraction to the same and/or opposite sex, and
gender identity" refers to one's inner sense of one's own gender, which may or may not match the sex
assigned at birth.

? DLA provides EEO and human resources services to DSCA
No. 11-9971.

#### Caldwell *v.*Warren, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 103 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 103

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

    Waiving certain enrollment requirements with respect to certain 
           specified bills of the One Hundred Fifth Congress.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 103

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Waiving certain enrollment requirements with respect to certain 
           specified bills of the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the provisions of 
sections 106 and 107 of title 1, United States Code, are waived for the 
balance of the first session of the One Hundred Fifth Congress with 
respect to the printing (on parchment or otherwise) of the enrollment 
of any bill or joint resolution making general appropriations for the 
fiscal year ending on September 30, 1998, or continuing appropriations 
for the fiscal year ending on September 30, 1998. The enrollment of any 
such bill or joint resolution shall be in such form as the Committee on 
House Oversight of the House of Representatives certifies to be a true 
enrollment.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 10 
      (legislative day, November 9), 1997.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```