alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00322-CR

Erik White

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 371st District Court

of Tarrant County (1330414D)

July 30, 2015

Opinion by Justice Charles Bleil

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Charles Bleil

 Justice Charles Bleil
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                OSHMAN'S SPORTING GOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
                                  (UNAUDITED)
                     (in thousands, except per share data)


<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                     THREE MONTHS ENDED     THREE MONTHS ENDED       NINE MONTHS ENDED       NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                      NOVEMBER 2, 1996       OCTOBER 28, 1995         NOVEMBER 2, 1996        OCTOBER 28, 1995
                                    --------------------   ---------------------    ---------------------   --------------------
                                                  FULLY                   FULLY                  FULLY                   FULLY
                                     PRIMARY     DILUTED    PRIMARY      DILUTED     PRIMARY    DILUTED      PRIMARY    DILUTED   
                                    --------    --------   --------    ---------    ---------  ----------   ---------  ---------
<S>                                 <C>         <C>        <C>         <C>          <C>        <C>           <C>        <C> 
NET LOSS                            $(2,895)    $ (2,895)  $ (3,141)   $ (3,141)    $(12,157)   $ (12,157)   $ (2,199)  $ (2,199)
                                    =======     ========   ========    ========     ========    =========    ========   ========

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF 
 COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING            5,830        5,830      5,815       5,815        5,828        5,828       5,814      5,814

EXCESS OF SHARES ISSUABLE 
 UPON EXERCISE OF STOCK
 OPTIONS OVER SHARES DEEMED
 RETIRED UNDER THE "TREASURY
 STOCK" METHOD                           --           --         --          --           --           --          --         --
                                    =======     ========   ========    ========     ========    =========    ========   ========

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF
 COMMON AND DILUTIVE COMMON
 EQUIVALENT SHARES OUTSTANDING        5,830        5,830      5,815       5,815        5,828        5,828       5,814      5,814
                                    =======     ========   ========    ========     ========    =========    ========   ========

    EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON
     AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE    $  (.50)    $   (.50)  $   (.54)   $   (.54)    $  (2.09)   $   (2.09)   $   (.38)  $   (.38)
                                    =======     ========   ========    ========     ========    =========    ========   ========
</TABLE>
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-7044 STEVEN PREMINGER,

Petitioner,

v. SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent. On petition for review pursuant to 38 U.S.C. Section 502.

ON MOTION 

### ORDER Upon consideration of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs' motion for an extension of time, until April 13, 2009, to file the certified list and administrative record, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. FOR THE COURT 

# APR 9 2009 /s/ Jan Horbalv Date Jan Horbaly Clerk FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT cc: Scott J. Rafferty, Esq. Jane W. Vanneman, Esq. APR 0 9 

### 2009 s8 CLERK
June 2, 2016 

Mr. Abel Acosta

Clerk, Court of Criminal Appeals 

P. O. Box 12308 

Austin, TX 78711 

RE: Case No. AP-77,041 

 Trial Court Case No. 2012-434,109 

Style: Brian Suniga 

v.

 The State of Texas 

Dear Mr. Acosta: 

The undersigned attorney acknowledges receipt of the Court’s 

May 23, 2016, letter in the above cause, inquiring as to whether the 

parties will appear for oral argument. In response to the Court’s 

inquiry, the undersigned attorney hereby gives notice of intent to 

appear at the June 15, 2016, oral argument on behalf of the State of 

Texas. The State hereby designates the first, second, and fourth issues 

as issues that it intends to argue, time permitting, at the oral argument. 

 Thank you for your courtesies. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 By: /s/ Jeffrey S. Ford 

 Jeffrey S. Ford 

 Assistant Criminal District Attorney 

 Appellate Chief 

copy: Ms. Hilary Sheard 

 Law Office of Hilary Sheard 

 7421 Burnet Road #300-512 

 Austin, TX 78757 

Administrator

 Anthony Holcomb

First Assistant District Attorney

 Wade Jackson

Chief Investigator

 Todd Smith

Appellate Division

 Jeffrey Ford - Chief

 Lauren Murphree

Grand Jury/Intake Division

 Trey Hill - Deputy D.A.

 Eddie Wharf

Victim Assistance Coordinator.

 Laney Dickey

Juvenile Division

 Kim Hayes - Chief

 Jeri Leigh Myers

Civil Division

 Neal Burt - Chief

 Donna Clarke

 Morgan Vaughan

 Deirdre Ward -CPS

 Theresa Ratliff -CPS

 Kacee Harvey -CPS

Felony Prosecutors

Sunshine Stanek - Deputy DA

Barron Slack - Assistant Felony DA

Narcotics/Property Crimes

 Mandi Say

Intoxication Cases/Misd Chief

 Tom Brummett

137th District Court

 Laura Beth Fossett -Chief

 Ashley Davis

 Chris Schulte

140th District Court

 Traci Bowman - Chief

 Jessica Schneider

 Neal Spradlin

364th District Court

 Aaron Moncibaiz- Chief

 Courtney Grafft

 Cara Landers

County Court at Law #1

 Ryan Brooke - Chief

 Greg Jerman

 Cassie Nesbitt

County Court at Law #2

 Ginny Shewmake - Chief

 Craig Oglesby

Domestic Violence

 Jennifer Slack

Office of the Criminal District Attorney

MATTHEW D. POWELL

CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY

P.O. BOX 10536

LUBBOCK, TEXAS 79408-3536

Lubbock County Courthouse

904 Broadway

Second Floor

Lubbock, Texas 79401

(806)775-1100 Fax (806)775-7930

AP-77,041

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 6/2/2016 10:19:14 PM

Accepted 6/3/2016 7:30:54 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ChrisKen Partners Cash Income Fund
L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, John F. Kennedy, President (Principal Executive
Officer) of ChrisKen Income Properties, Inc., the Managing General Partner of
the Partnership, and Robert Mayer, Acting Principal Financial Officer of
ChrisKen Income Properties, Inc., the Managing General Partner of the
Partnership, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.

Date: August 12, 2005


                                     By: /s/ John F. Kennedy
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         John F. Kennedy
                                         President
                                         ChrisKen Income Properties, Inc.,
                                            Managing General Partner
                                         ChrisKen Partners Cash Income Fund L.P.


                                     By: /s/ Robert Mayer
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Robert Mayer
                                         Acting Principal Accounting Officer
                                         ChrisKen Income Properties, Inc.,
                                            Managing General Partner
                                         ChrisKen Partners Cash Income Fund L.P.
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: 2/03/15

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Howard J. Hoffman, EPA - OGC

SUBJECT: 2/03/15 Meeting Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

with NRDC

SUMMARY

On February 2, 2015, Lorie Schmidt, Elliott Zenick, Aileen Roder, Daniel Schramm, 

Scott Jordan and I met with David Doniger and Benjamin Longstreth of the Natural Resources 

Defense Council to discuss legal issues concerning the Clean Power Plan proposal for Existing 

Power Plants.
No. 11-1524.

#### Mulk et al. *v.*Ohio Department of Job and Family Services.

Ct. App. Ohio, Franklin County. Certiorari denied.
DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY
2800 DEFENSE PENTAGON
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20301-2800

OCT 16 2023

MEMORANDUM FOR DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY WORKFORCE

SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2024 Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Harassment and
Discrimination Policy Statement

The Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) is committed to ensuring all
members of our workforce are treated with dignity and respect, while promoting a work
environment that is free from sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination.
Harassment and discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity! is prohibited.
Senior leaders, supervisors, and managers are expected to model appropriate leadership
behavior, set an example for all members of our workforce, and make clear that discrimination
based upon sexual orientation or gender identity is not acceptable.

It is unlawful to sut
work environment based
offensive or derogatory re
or gender transition

i employee to workplace harassment that creates a hostile
tation or gender identity. Harassment can include
aout sexual orientation or about a person's transgender status

Employees should immediately report all incidents of harassment based on sexual
orientation or gender identity, observed or personally experienced, to their supervisory chain,
our Talent Management (1M) Directorate, or both. Upon becoming aware that an employee is
being harassed, managers and supervisors will take prompt, appropriate action to stop the
harassment and will immediately report all allegations of harassment to TM. Retaliation will
not be tolerated against any employee for reporting harassment.

Employees who believe they have been discriminated against based upon gender
identity or sexual orientation may contact an Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)
Counselor to file a discrimination complaint through the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA)

EEO & Diversity Office? by email at HQEEOInquiries@dla.mil or by phone at 571-767-
6777. Employees should contact a DLA EEO Counselor within 45 calendar days from the
date of the alleged discriminatory act.

DSCA will sustain a culture and climate in which every employee is safe, supported,
and granted an equal opportunity to contribute to the success of the Agency's mission.
Collectively, we share the responsibility to promote a dignified and inclusive workplace
where our team members are resilient, valued, and ready to respond to emerging challenges in

security cooperation.
fr" a. Wer

James A. Hursch
Director

"Sexual orientation” refers to one’s emotional or physical attraction to one or more sexes, and "'gender identity" refers
to one's inner sense of one’s own gender, which may or may not match the sex assigned at birth.
2 DLA provides EEO and human resources services to DSCA
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1791

TAMARA ROUHI,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

KETTLER; HABITAT AMERICA LLC,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Stephanie A. Gallagher, District Judge. (1:19-cv-03052-SAG)

Submitted: December 17, 2020 Decided: December 21, 2020

Before THACKER, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tamara Rouhi, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Lester Simmons, Jr., WHITEFORD, 

TAYLOR & PRESTON, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Mark Anthony Kozlowski, LAW 

OFFICES OF JONATHAN P. STEBENNE, London, Kentucky; Louis C. Long, Charles 

Benjamin Peoples, THOMAS, THOMAS & HAFER, LLP, Washington, D.C., for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Tamara Rouhi appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint for lack of 

subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rouhi v. Kettler, No. 

1:19-cv-03052-SAG (D. Md. June 24, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 11-1469.

#### McCoy *v.*Mississippi State Tax Commission.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 47 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 47

To designate a flag-pole upon which the flag of the United States is to 
be set at half-staff whenever a law enforcement officer is slain in the 
                             line of duty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 12, 1997

 Mr. Foglietta (for himself, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. Schumer, 
   Ms. Norton, Mr. Serrano, Mr. Manton, Mrs. Kelly, Mr. Ramstad, Mr. 
 Frost, Mr. Wolf, Mr. Kind of Wisconsin, Mr. Filner, Mr. McGovern, Mr. 
 Klink, Mr. Weller, Mr. Rothman, Mr. Smith of Washington, Mr. Saxton, 
Mr. Hall of Texas, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. Kleczka, and Mr. Stupak) submitted 
    the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
To designate a flag-pole upon which the flag of the United States is to 
be set at half-staff whenever a law enforcement officer is slain in the 
                             line of duty.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. INSTRUCTION.

    (a) Slain Law Enforcement Officers.--The Capitol Police Board shall 
designate or establish a flag pole upon which the flag of the United 
States shall be flown at half-staff for one day whenever a Federal, 
State, local, or territorial law enforcement officer is slain in the 
line of duty.
    (b) Establishment of Procedures.--The Capitol Police Board shall 
establish efficient and effective procedures to execute subsection (a), 
and to--
            (1) ensure that the official responsible for setting the 
        flag of the United States is informed or learns promptly of the 
        slaying of any law enforcement officer;
            (2) post public notice in close proximity to the flag being 
        flown at half-staff of the name, tenure of service, and 
        jurisdiction of a slain law enforcement officer being honored; 
        and
            (3) present the flag of the United States which is flown at 
        half-staff in honor of a slain law enforcement officer to the 
        family of the slain law enforcement officer.
                                 <all>
```
__________________________________________

__________________________________________

__________________________________________

__________________________________________

__________________________________________

__________________________________________ OMB Control No.2060-0347



### STATEMENT OF ENERGY DESIGN INTENT September 5, 2007 FACILITY INFORMATION Facility Name and Location School Dallas, TX - United States 75202 Building ___________________________________ Owner/Company ___________________________________ Facility Characteristics Address ___________________________________ K-12 School 90,000 Sq. Ft. ___________________________________ Total Gross Floor Area 90,000 Sq. Ft. Contact Name ___________________________________ Phone ___________________________________ Design Energy (kBtu) 1 Email ___________________________________ Electricity 2,217,800 Natural Gas 600,000 DESIGN ENERGY PERFÒ Energy DESIGN ENERGY STAR EPA Energy Performance Rating (1 – 100) Percent Energy Reduction (%) 2 88 36 75 20 Site Energy Use Intensity (kBtu/sf/yr) 31.3 39.4 Total Annual Site Energy (kBtu) 2,817,800 3,543,974 Total Annual Energy Cost ($) $ 49,156 $ 61,824 Pollution Emissions (1000 lbs/yr) CO 2 846 1,060 PROFESSIONAL VERIFICATION Licensed Architect/Engineer Prepared By Firm Name Address Phone Email Architect of Record (if different from above) Name __________________________________________ Firm Name __________________________________________ Phone __________________________________________ Email __________________________________________ Professional Stamp Signature & Date

The facility was designed and specified to meet the Design Energy performance calculations shown on this Statement of Energy Design Intent. 1 Target Finder uses data fro equipm 2 Percent energy reduced is̀
This

### K-12 

## STATEMENT OF ENERGY DESIGN INTENT September 5, 2007 Facility Name and Location School Dallas, TX - United States 75202 Facility Characteristics (Detail) School Gross Number Number Operating Cooking % % Months Ventilated Floor Area of Students of PCs Hours/Week Facility Air-Conditioned Heated 90000 Sq. Ft. 600 100 70 Hours Yes 100 100 10 Yes

Additional̀

This document was generated from Target Finder, an EPA tool located on the ENERGY STAR Web site, www.energystar.gov. The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 3 hours per response. Send comments on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection techniques to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460. Include the OMB control number in any correspondence. Do not send the completed form to this address. EPA Form 5900-22 Page 2 of 2
#### Dennis Wayne MIZE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S. TSENG, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-17074

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*548Submitted November 15, 2017 *

Filed November 20, 2017

Dennis Wayne Mize, Pro Se

Byron M. Miller, Esquire, Deputy Attorney General, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument, *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Mize’s request for oral argument, set forth in his opening brief, is denied.

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Dennis Wayne Mize appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal on the basis of qualified immunity. *Nelson v. Heiss,*271 F.3d 891, 893 (9th Cir. 2001). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Mize’s Eighth Amendment claim on the basis of qualified immunity because defendants’ conduct did not violate clearly established law. *See Pearson v. Callahan,*555 U.S. 223, 232, 129 S.Ct. 808, 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009) (defendant is entitled to qualified immunity unless the conduct at issue violated a clearly established constitutional right); *Hope v. Pelzer,*536 U.S. 730, 739, 122 S.Ct. 2508, 153 L.Ed.2d 666 (2002) (“For a constitutional right to be clearly established, its contours must be sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he is doing violates that right,” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

Mize’s request for appointment of counsel, set forth in his opening brief, is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
CERTIFICATION                                                       Exhibit 31.2
Chief Financial Officer
I, Stephen K. Radusch, Chief Financial Officer certify that:

     1.  I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB of  Chadmoore
         Wireless Group, Inc;

     2.  Based on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement
         of a material fact or omit to state a material  fact  necessary to make
         the  statements  made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such
         statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
         by the report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other financial
         information  included in the  report,  fairly  present in all  material
         respects the financial  conditions,  the results of its  operations and
         cash flows of the issuer as of, and for,  the periods  presented in the
         report;

     4.  The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are
         responsible for  establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
         procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
         registrant and have:

         a.   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures to ensure that
              material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its
              consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to them by others within
              those  entities,  particularly  during  the  period  in which  the
              periodic reports are being prepared;

         b.   Evaluated  the   effectiveness  of  the  registrant's   disclosure
              controls and  procedures  as of a date within 90 days prior to the
              filing date of the report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c.   Presented in the report their  conclusions about the effectiveness
              of  the  disclosure   controls  and  procedures   based  on  their
              evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     5.  The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officers  and I have
         disclosed,  based on our most recent evaluation,  to the small business
         issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the board of directors (or
         persons fulfilling the equivalent function):

         a.   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
              or operation of internal  controls or  financial  reporting  which
              could adversely  affect the issuer's  ability to record,  process,
              summarize and report financial data; and

         b.   Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or
              other employees who have a significant  role in the small business
              issuer's internal controls over financial reporting.


May 16, 2005

/s/ STEPHEN K. RADUSCH
-----------------------
Stephen K. Radusch
Chief Financial Officer