alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 21, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-40397

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ISRAEL GONZALEZ-SANDOVAL,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:03-CR-1828-1

--------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Israel GonzalezSandoval concedes that the arguments raised are foreclosed by

circuit precedent but seeks to preserve them for further review. 

The Government has moved for summary affirmance in lieu of filing

an appellee’s brief. The motion is GRANTED, and the judgment of

the district court is AFFIRMED.
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 1030

ANTHONY G. BRYANT

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

,

v.

U.S. SECRET SERVICE; U.S. POSTAL SERVICE; SOUTH CAROLINA INSURANCE COMMISSION; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES

,

Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston

. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. ( 2:19

- cv

- 03580

- MBS

- MGB )

Submitted : June 18, 2020 Decided: June 22, 2020

Before FLOYD, THACKER, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Anthony G. Bryant, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Anthony G. Bryant filed this notice of appeal shortly after bringing a new action in

the district court; the court has not yet taken any a ction on Bryant’s complaint. This court

may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (201 8 ), and certain

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (201 8 ); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b);

Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The district court

has not issued a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly,

we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal content ions are adequately presented in the materials before this court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8287 

To amend title 54, United States Code, to increase public access to 

recreational areas on Federal land. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2020 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself and Mr. GOSAR) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend title 54, United States Code, to increase public 

access to recreational areas on Federal land. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE FOR RECREATIONAL PUBLIC AC4 CESS. 

5 Subsection (c) of section 200306 of title 54, United 

6 States Code, is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘3 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘10 

8 percent’’; and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8287 IH

1 (2) by striking ‘‘$15,000,000’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘$50,000,000’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.2


                                CERTIFICATION




         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code),
the undersigned officer of BF Enterprises, Inc. a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify that (1) this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at December 31,
2002 and March 31, 2003 and its results of operations for the three-month
periods ended March 31, 2002 and March 31, 2003.


 Date: May 9, 2003                           /s/ S. Douglas Post
                                             ---------------------------
                                             S. Douglas Post
                                             Vice President, Treasurer and
                                             Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


Gundle/SLT Environmental, Inc.

SUBSIDIARY LIST:

GSE International, Inc.
GSE Lining Technology, Inc.
GSE Foreign Sales Ltd.
GSE Clay Lining Technology Co.
GSE Lining Technology GmbH
GSE Lining Technology Pty Ltd
GSE (UK) Limited
GSE Lining Technology Limited
Gundle Environmental Ltd.
SGS Geosystems Limited
Geoplastics Gesellschaft Fur Abdichtungssysteme mbH
Deposita Folientechnik GmbH
Hyma/GSE Lining Technology Co.
Hyma/GSE Manufacturing Co.
GSE Lining Technology Company Ltd.
GSE Lining Technology S.L.
GSE Australia Limited
GSE Gulf Offshore Ltd
GSE Gulf FZE (in liquidation)
Deposita Folientechnik GmbH
Deposita Folientechnik GmbH
Ground Sea Air International Forwarders, Inc.
GSE Lining Technology (Canada) LTD
Serrot International, Inc. Sales Corp.
Bentofix Technologies, Inc.
Bentofix Technologies (USA) Inc.
# Congressional Research Service (CRS) Ukraine Factsheet

/ Published April 14, 2023
1 The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-3543

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. Bobby Jack Stanley, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: June 6, 2006 Filed: June 9, 2006

___________ Before MELLOY, FAGG, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Bobby Jack Stanley pleaded guilty to distribution of methamphetamine, and was sentenced to 12 months and 1 day in prison and 3 years of supervised release. After Stanley began serving his supervised release, th e probation officer petitioned to revoke supervised release alleging that Stanley had violated his release conditions. At a subsequent revocation hearing, Stanle y admitted violating the conditions of his supervised release as alleged. The district court 1 revoked supervised release and imposed a new sentence of 9 months im prisonment, commenting on the Chapter 7-2- Guidelines recommended revocation range, Stanley’s prior and current supervised release violations, and the leniency of the sentence that he had received for his original offense. Stanley appeals his revocation sentence.
The revocation sentence was within authorized limits, and the district court considered appropriate factors in imposing it. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3). We conclude that Stanley’s se ntence is not unreasonable. See United States v. Tyson , 413 F.3d 824, 825 (8th Cir. 2005) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm, and we also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Joshua Lee Bolton, Appellant

No. 06

- 17

- 00129

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 5th District Court of Cass County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2016F0025 ). Opinion delivered by Chi ef Justice Morriss, Justice Moseley and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We note that the appellant, Joshua Lee Bolton, has adequately indicated his inability to
pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MARCH 23, 201 8 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
**Exhibit 31.2**
**Certifications**Certification of Principal Financial Officer
I, Diane M. Barrett, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of NovenPharmaceuticals, Inc., certify that:
1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Noven Pharmaceuticals,Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2004;
2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
/s/ Diane M. Barrett
No. 11-10365.

#### Johnson *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
# U.S. DoD CTR Program (DoD CTR) Biological Threat Reduction Engagement with THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

/ Published April 14, 2023
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-16-00386-CV

C.H., Appellant

V.

S.L., Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 360th District Court

of Tarrant County (360-578634-15)

October 11, 2018

Opinion by Justice Pittman

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Mark T. Pittman_________________

 Justice Mark T. Pittman
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION, INCOME AND CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JAN-3-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                      463
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                               0<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     464
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                            448
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0<F1>
<PREFERRED>                                          0<F1>
<COMMON>                                             0<F1>
<OTHER-SE>                                          11
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       464
<SALES>                                              0<F1>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    27
<CGS>                                                0<F1>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  27
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0<F1>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0<F1>
<CHANGES>                                            0<F1>
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>NOT APPICABLE
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 75

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that States

tences.offenders and criminals serving abbreviated senproblem of violent crimes committed by repeatshould work more aggressively to attack the
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 75

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas a disturbing number of law-abiding citizens believe

they are prisoners in their own homes because of increasing violence in our society;

Whereas law-abiding citizens have the right to be fearful

knowing that violent offenders only serve on average 48

percent of the sentence they received;
2

•HCON 75 EH

Whereas more than 2⁄3 of persons under correctional supervision are currently on parole and not incarcerated;

Whereas 1 in 3 offenders admitted to State prisons were on

probation or parole violators;

Whereas the Federal Government eliminated parole in 1984

and prisoners convicted of Federal crimes now serve at

least 85 percent of their sentences;

Whereas under current Federal law, States are eligible for

prison construction funds if they keep felons in prison for

at least 85 percent of their sentence;

Whereas in 1996, at least 25 States, among them Arizona,

California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, and Washington, have laws that

meet the 85 percent of sentence served requirements set

forth in the 1994 crime bill; and

Whereas the National Association of Police Organizations,

the International Chiefs of Police, the Fraternal Order of

Police, the National Association of Chiefs of Police, the

National District Attorney’s Association, and the Safe

Streets Coalition support the concept of an 85 percent

minimum length of service for violent criminals: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—

3 (1) Congress commends Arizona, California,

4 Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois,

5 Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mis-
3

•HCON 75 EH

1 sissippi, Missouri, New York, North Carolina, North

2 Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Caro3 lina, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, and Washington for

4 their existing efforts with respect to prison time

5 served by criminal offenders;

6 (2) Congress encourages all remaining States to

7 adopt as quickly as possible legislation to increase

8 the time served by violent felons; and

9 (3) with respect to Federal crimes, Congress re10 emphasizes its support for the requirement that indi11 viduals who commit violent crimes should serve at

12 least 85 percent of their sentence.

Passed the House of Representatives July 29, 1997.

Attest:

Clerk.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.5

                       Consent of Independent Accountants

     We hereby consent to the use in this Amendment No. 5 to Registration
Statement on Form S-4 of our reports dated May 2, 2002, except as to Notes 20
and 21 to the consolidated financial statements, which are as of November 18,
2002, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule of Hanover Compression Limited Partnership, which appear in such
Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading
"Experts" in such Registration Statement.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas
February 7, 2003
aena_ex102.htm


Exhibit 10.2


 




  





1











  






 


 




  





2











  






 


 




  





3











  






 


 


4
,.-:.- 

.-’ 1 

- 

OFFICE OF THE A-ITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

I OROVLR SLLLSRS 

ATIORNKY OcNrnAL 
moDomduionohall~torP tos ,tbo l a to r a o roa a t t 

et tb tmttk o u6 r r ta *tj 

oatlea ot arti, tk 

at tlo l.a to la et 080 

r eua r tlm ot the lltluo u et 

tb Bt8u la tb o p ma o tla t m p a 8lsUtetJ o a u6 

la u 08ma r lma o .~ 
. 

'. . . 

. -. 

92. Thl&Duranr,whaBfmum 

*¶4 0l4m, ta u l o a 0 r a - 0 p uti r r ( Lla 

tG 

CL 

. eoamlm~ tb..tlv1tlE5' 

UN4 a p t68 tu 

l ndtwt8a4tnrtlsgottha 

o t th a lo w eatoraemoot r g 8a o lou tthe Ik k , th 4 

oeMt10. l Ed the mmloip8~ltlw. It umu ooopustorlthootmt radvAnlo&8lpls8erutbep 

1tl.r liaavltb 

stab, aab la 0 

1L naio rtrtlmm, h 8ua 

tE r matar. 

3. a+. 

~4, m -8~ 8bii pr~tdr m m rq-84 

oxohM@ ot lafbm aaleaMta# thB ooRtlrdbu 

OtdJBUOadth. triol.aterrutbr 

law ktuoautheh at ynrsia ot this 

ado, lta ooantlu on4 mnloi~lltla8 0~14 otbm 

,84tao •n4tboMtsoMl&4woma.ntb~ 
. . -.._.. 
I 

maomb10,Ismm fm7lma - pqio S 

fho rbon opinion of tblr dop-taont lo rapport.6 w 

the 6oolrloar l t Uu tlu 

r4 

ram Oaurt ot SCur is tbo 0000 of 

(, 

.8orr4 voe Rousta Ra oaal l@o&a 

r 

Doak, RS6 0. u. loal rrd 

lu tha oua ot Yu7lll ta. 8pu& 04 Tm 191, 

~lfWOf@ ioiOnAO.0~~00,r@a(knd bytbl8 Oo~~rt,- 

aent l ud thr mdborit lp l m 01toI tbuola, it la oar l plnloa that 

tho brgartmat ot Nbllo Safety la l utharlu4 to l aoara the 

s 

lot 

a t la nd lad uaot 0 rrdio broadarrtiry rktlos oa aasa out 0 

tba gamrrl rpproprlatlonr for ml4 (kpartmot, a* l&108%4 

w 1-a SS ot San8u bill SlT, rot tba two-prr ~ulod l adly 

Au@& s1, 1941. 

l trlru tin. 

#a@ thararoro, IaBWr pur wlutloa la ttm 

Tbo Iupulatiea, “that t& ptopart 

lnataU4tloa of a rr& io 

la to k uuaa by 

%wdorstiog 

voat~tho dopartmatrbould dulm ta 

that tho ha4 will rtirort.kok to tha 

I@ l oerltrao0url quutlaa rad it is 8uggut.4 that tba &lktlon rl*o prorM0 thot tha uputaut 

rbllhwo the tl&t to remvo cay rnd all bufldi.s.& tlxtun8 

a a l d q ulp aaa plua4 t upon uld land 

wbn, lt rbm4oaa ar ~)*.a tbo Redlo % 

tho 4oprtmbt ii,aad 

ordoartisg S$o~loa ott 

l t M l4 la d. 

It la not tho lataatloa or tblr 4opuideaat to par8 

8pon tb, tiuo of the kot et 1aJM i8 go*Bt&n rrd the proJ?orrd 

due # l uto#ame e P MY tromtbol)fot A?lia(too, hBB, 

b do Dopartmat 01 .pobllo Stiot7, lbo *8lUlt~ et tb tltlm 

ziLEr@ la 

& dead, # .o&vyon~o 008 bo but ~taralaod w tn 

l t tk rbrtnot ot &la h ~uld'lrrad ut4 b7 aa larprotlw ot tk progoro4 bed., or l oavayunao, to thor wSth & 

0077OtthO l h UtW l tthOtiit 

L 

Of &lb#OlI l 0s the rcrrolatlou l 0d 0mrr l t ma l itt oia*at te “id 4.04, OT eonv.yM.a*
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Windswept Environmental
Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December
31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I , Charles L. Kelly, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

              (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                    13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

              (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and results
                    of operations of the Company.


                                                   /s/ Charles L, Kelly, Jr.
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Charles L. Kelly, Jr.
                                                Chief Financial Officer

                                                Dated: February 14, 2003
No. 11-10331.

#### Smith *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Threat Reduction Agency 

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  DTRA Leadership             
  -  DTRA History             
  -  Mission             
  -  Strategic Initiatives             
  -  Foreign Malign Influence             
  -  Agency Overview Brief (pdf)             
  -  Agency Financial Report 
-  Careers & Opportunities    -  Your Civilian Career             
  -  Your Military Career             
  -  Welcome Aboard 
-  Business    -  DTRA Contract Award Data             
  -  Office of Small Business             
  -  Mentor Protege Program 
-  News & Media    -  Press Center 
-  Contact Us		 
-  Joint Operations Center		 

# DTRA FOIA Reading Room Archive

# FOIA Request 22-008 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

## Related Links

22-008 PDF

COVID
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JEFFREY OSBORNE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-714

[July 9, 2020]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Jeffrey Dana Gillen, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-1997-CF-002938-AXXX-MB.

Jeffrey Osborne, South Bay, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., GROSS and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.