alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                           Certifications Pursuant to
                            18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southern Investors Service
Company, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Walter M. Mischer, Sr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                             /s/ Walter M. Mischer, Sr.
                             ----------------------------------
                             Name:    Walter M. Mischer, Sr.
                             Title:   Chief Executive Officer
                             Date:    August 19, 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southern Investors Service
Company, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Eric Schumann, Senior Vice President - Finance and Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                             /s/ Eric Schumann
                             ----------------------------------
                             Name:    Eric Schumann
                             Title:   Senior Vice President - Finance
                                Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
                             Date:    August 19, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 354 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 354

                To correct the enrollment of H.R. 4328.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 20, 1998

 Mr. Frelinghuysen (for himself, Mr. Franks of New Jersey, Mr. Meehan, 
Mr. Miller of Florida, Mr. Quinn, Mr. Barrett of Wisconsin, Mr. Sununu, 
Mr. Boehlert, Mr. Neumann, Mr. Pappas, Mr. Shays, Mrs. Roukema, and Mr. 
    Upton) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
                To correct the enrollment of H.R. 4328.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 4328, making appropriations 
for the Department of Transportation and related agencies for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 1999, and for other purposes, the 
Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make the following 
correction: Strike section 103 of division A.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-9807.

#### Butler *v.*Mitchell, Superintendent, Old Colony Correctional Center.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vagas DAVIS, a/k/a Vegas Gabriel Davis, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-7218

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 18, 2018

Decided: January 23, 2018

Vagas Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Mastandrea-Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

*223Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Vagas Davis appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012). We have reviewed the record included on appeal and find no reversible error and no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Davis,*No. 3:10-cr-00309-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 24, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Windswept Environmental
Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Michael O'Reilly, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and Charles L. Kelly, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

              (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                    13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

              (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and results
                    of operations of the Company.



                                                   /s/ Michael O'Reilly
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Michael O'Reilly
                                                 President and
                                                 Chief Executive Officer



                                                   /s/ Charles L. Kelly, Jr.
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Charles L. Kelly, Jr.
                                                 Chief Financial Officer



                                                 Dated: November 14, 2003
#### CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Respondent v. GRYPHIN COATINGS, INC. Petition of: 5627-41 Hegeman Street, LLC

No. 348 EAL 2017

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

January 8, 2018

*106ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          27,951
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  124,306
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (12,500)
<INVENTORY>                                     10,811
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               167,283
<PP&E>                                         244,692
<DEPRECIATION>                                 132,651
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,515,164
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          920,034
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,654
<OTHER-SE>                                     431,179
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,515,164
<SALES>                                        179,031
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               179,031
<CGS>                                           27,783
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,783
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               257,159
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,645
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (118,555)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (118,555)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Sterling H. McDonald, Chief Financial Officer of Natural Gas Systems, Inc.,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Natural Gas Systems,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's Board of
Directors:

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

       Date:  February 14, 2006

                                                       /s/ STERLING  H. MCDONALD
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Sterling H. McDonald
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
INDOOR HARVEST CORP. 8-K


 


Exhibit 10.3


 


 


Vice
President Resignation Letter


 


 


John
Zimmerman

10258 Timber Trail Drive


Dallas,
TX 75229


Phone:
(214) 878-1172


Email:
john.zimmerman@harvestairllc.com



 


December
13, 2017


 


 


Board
of Directors


Indoor
Harvest Corp.


5300
East Freeway, Suite A


Houston,
Texas 77020


 


Dear
Board of Directors:


 


Please
accept this letter as my formal notice of resignation as Vice President of Business Development for Indoor Harvest Corp, effective
immediately. My resignation is not the result of any disagreements with the company, or it’s board of directors, on any
matter relating to operations, policies (including accounting or financial policies) or practices. My resignation is purely a
personal decision to devote most of my time and efforts on growing Harvest Air, LLC. I fully support the company’s current
strategy and efforts related to the Tempe, AZ project, and subsequent Parachute, CO project, and I will remain a member of the
Indoor Harvest Board of Directors to help make this strategy successful.


 


 


 


Sincerely,


 


/s/
John Zimmerman


John
Zimmerman
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D20-3389

_____________________________

BRETT A. HOLLOWAY,

Appellant,

v.

REBECCA DENAE HOLLOWAY,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

J. Scott Duncan, Judge.

September 10, 2021

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Whitlock v. Veltkamp, 296 So. 3d 528, 530 (Fla. 

1st DCA 2020).

LEWIS, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jason Cromey, Pensacola, for Appellant.

Rebecca Denae Holloway, pro se, Appellee.
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0072

SAT Date: 11/9/2012

Print Date: 2/4/2013

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2 3

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: Yes

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: IRR-E,S,L,MM, LUNG, UNCERT-SENS, AQUATOX-A,C

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0063-77

FATE: Estimations for typical 

Liquid with MP < 25 C (E)

log Kow = 3.30 (E) 

S = Dispersible / 73.2 mg/L at 25 C (ICB / E)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

log Koc = 5.66 (E)

log Fish BCF = 1.85 (E)
log Fish BAF = 1.79 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong

PBT Potential: P1B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is poor through the skin, moderate through 

the GI tract, and good through the lungs based on analogs. The PMN material is expected to be 

a strong irritant to all exposed tissues based on the amines and the surfactant properties of the 

material. There is also concern for lung effects if respirable particles are inhaled based on 

cationic binding to lung tissues and/or interference with the natural surfactant balance in the 

lungs. There is uncertain concern for sensitization for the . Moderate 

concern. 

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 1.3 aliphatic amine SAR

daphnid 48-h LC50 0.21 aliphatic amine SAR

green algal 96-h EC50 0.078 amide SAR

fish _ chronic value 0.012 amide SAR

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.023 aliphatic amine SAR

algal _ chronic 

value

0.038 aliphatic amine SAR

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for aliphatic amines and amides; 

SAR chemical class = aliphatic amine, amide; liquid; log Kow = 5.15 (EPI); S = 

dispersible in water at 25 C (P); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active 

ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness < 150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC 

<2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

1 amide SAR

SARs aliphatic amines and amides

SAR Class aliphatic amine, amide

Ecotox Category None
Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: Becky Jones
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
No. 85 A 1 7
Filed 2 March 2018
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

v. GLENWOOD EARL DOWNEY

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A

- 30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of
the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 7 96 S.E.2d 517 (201 7 ), affirming an order denying defendant’s motion to suppress entered on 16 September 201 5 by Judge

Thomas H. Lock , and a judgment e ntered on 30 September 2 01 5 by Judge Reuben F.
Young, both in Superior Court, Johnston County

. Heard in the Supreme Court on 7
February 2018

.

Joshua H. Stein , Attorney General, by Derrick C. Mertz, Special Deputy Attorney General , for the State

. Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, by Michele A. Goldman , Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant

- appell ant

.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6710

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL D. PAHUTSKI,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, 

District Judge. (3:07-cr-00211-MR-1; 3:12-cv-00308-MR)

Submitted: September 25, 2014 Decided: September 30, 2014

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael D. Pahutski, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina;

Melissa Louise Rikard, Assistant United States Attorney, 

Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael D. Pahutski seeks to appeal the district 

court’s April 21, 2014 order denying seven motions Pahutski 

filed while his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion was pending. For 

the reasons that follow, we dismiss this appeal. 

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final 

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and 

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545–

46 (1949). In the underlying order, the district court rejected 

Pahutski’s motions to withdraw his guilty plea, for sanctions, 

to strike the Government’s response to his § 2255 motion, and 

for an expedited ruling on his § 2255 motion. As to these 

rulings, the appealed-from order is neither a final order nor an 

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we 

dismiss this appeal in part for lack of jurisdiction.

The district court also rejected Pahutski’s three 

motions for release or bail pending adjudication of his § 2255 

motion. Although a district court’s denial of such a request is 

an appealable collateral order, see, e.g., Pagan v. United 

States, 353 F.3d 1343, 1345-46 & n.4 (11th Cir. 2003) (adopting 

rule and collecting cases), in light of the district court’s May 

28, 2014 order denying the § 2255 motion, Pahutski’s appeal of 

this aspect of the court’s order is now moot. See Incumaa v. 
3

Ozmint, 507 F.3d 281, 285-86 (4th Cir. 2007) (setting forth the 

principles of appellate mootness). We therefore dismiss the 

remainder of this appeal as moot. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 353

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for the sine die adjournment of second

session of the One Hundred Fifth Congress.
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 353

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Wednesday, October 21, 1998, or Thursday,

4 October 22, 1998, on a motion offered pursuant to this

5 concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his des-
2

•HCON 353 EH

1 ignee, it stand adjourned sine die, or until noon on the

2 second day after Members are notified to reassemble pur3 suant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, or until

4 a time designated pursuant to section 3 of this resolution;

5 and that when the Senate adjourns on Wednesday, Octo6 ber 21, 1998, or Thursday, October 22, 1998, on a motion

7 offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Ma8 jority Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned sine die,

9 or until noon on the second day after Members are notified

10 to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent res11 olution.

12 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

13 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

14 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead15 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House

16 and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

17 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

18 SEC. 3. During any adjournment of the House pursu19 ant to this concurrent resolution, the Speaker, acting after

20 consultation with the Minority Leader, may notify the

21 Members of the House to reassemble whenever, in his

22 opinion, the public interest shall warrant it. After re23 assembling pursuant to this section, when the House ad24 journs on any day on a motion offered pursuant to this

25 section by its Majority Leader or his designee, the House
3

•HCON 353 EH

1 shall again stand adjourned pursuant to the first section

2 of this concurrent resolution.

Passed the House of Representatives October 20,

1998.

Attest:

Clerk.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 19

- 00316

- CV
In the interest of A. G. and C.M.G., Children
On Appeal from the 398th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. F

- 4874

- 18

- I

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered th is cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant , Arthur Fred Garza

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. Septemb er 19, 2019
DENY and Opinion Filed April 27, 2022 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00282-CV IN RE KATERINA MARIE RENO, Relator Original Proceeding from the 380th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380-50667-2021 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Osborne, Partida-Kipness, and Smith Opinion by Justice Smith Before the Court is relator’s March 31, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus in which she challenges the trial court’s modifications of the temporary orders and final protective orders. Entitlement to mandamus re lief requires relator to show that the trial court has clearly abused its discreti on and that she has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co ., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing the petition, response, repl y, and the record, we conclude that relator has failed to show an abuse of discretion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, we deny the petiti on for writ of mandamus.–2– We also lift the stay issued by th is Court’s March 31, 2022 order.

220282F.P05 /C r ai g Smith / CRAIG SMITH JUSTICE