19074 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 63 / Friday, April 1, 2022 / Notices 

1See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the 

Republic of Turkey: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review and Final 

Determination of No Shipments; 2019–2020, 87 FR 

7118 (February 8, 2022); see also Steel Concrete 

Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 

2019–2020; Correction, 87 FR 10334 (February 24, 

2022). 

Federal Register on February 8, 2022, in 

which Commerce announced the final 

results of the 2019–2020 administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on steel concrete reinforcing bar from 

the Republic of Turkey. This notice 

corrects the Assessment Rates section to 

include a sentence regarding Colakoglu 

Metalurji A.S./Colakoglu Dis Ticaret 

A.S.’s (Colakoglu) liquidation 

instructions that was inadvertently 

omitted. 

DATES: Applicable April 1, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Robert Copyak or Jose Rivera, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–3642 or (202) 482–0842, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Correction 

In the Federal Register of February 8, 

2022, in the FR Doc. 2022–02638 on 

page 7119, in the third column, in the 

section ‘‘Assessment Rate,’’ we 

inadvertently omitted a sentence related 

to the liquidation instructions for 

Colakoglu. The ‘‘Assessment Rate’’ 

section should include the sentence: 

‘‘Because we calculated a margin for 

Colakoglu which is zero or de minimis 

in the final results of this review, we 

intend to instruct CBP to liquidate the 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties.’’ 

Background 

On February 8, 2022, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

notice of the final results of the 2019– 

2020 administrative review.1 We 

inadvertently omitted a sentence in the 

‘‘Assessment Rates’’ section pertaining 

to Colakoglu. Thus, we are adding the 

following sentence in the ‘‘Assessment 

Rates’’ section of the notice: ‘‘Because 

we calculated a margin for Colakoglu 

which is zero or de minimis in the final 

results of this review, we intend to 

instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate 

entries without regard to antidumping 

duties.’’ This notice serves as a 

notification of this correction to the 

Federal Register notice published on 

February 8, 2022. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a) and 

777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended. 

Dated: March 25, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2022–06866 Filed 3–31–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Advance Notification of 

Sunset Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

Background 

Every five years, pursuant to the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the 

Department of Commerce (Commerce) 

and the International Trade Commission 

automatically initiate and conduct 

reviews to determine whether 

revocation of a countervailing or 

antidumping duty order or termination 

of an investigation suspended under 

section 704 or 734 of the Act would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of dumping or a 

countervailable subsidy (as the case may 

be) and of material injury. 

Upcoming Sunset Reviews for May 

2022 

Pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, 

the following Sunset Reviews are 

scheduled for initiation in May 2022 

and will appear in that month’s Notice 

of Initiation of Five-Year Sunset Reviews 

(Sunset Review). 

Department contact 

Antidumping Duty Proceedings 

Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from India A–533–871 (1st Review) .............................................................. Jacky Arrowsmith (202) 482–5255. 

Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from Italy A–475–835 (1st Review) ............................................................... Jacky Arrowsmith (202) 482–5255. 

Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from Spain A–469–815 (1st Review) ............................................................. Jacky Arrowsmith (202) 482–5255. 

Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from China A–570–893 (3rd Review) ................................................................... Mary Kolberg (202) 482–1785. 

Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India A–533–840 (3rd Review) .................................................................... Mary Kolberg (202) 482–1785. 

Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand A–549–822 (3rd Review) .............................................................. Mary Kolberg (202) 482–1785. 

Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Vietnam A–552–802 (3rd Review) ............................................................... Mary Kolberg (202) 482–1785. 

Welded Stainless Steel Pipe from Taiwan A–583–815 (1st Review) ............................................................... Jacky Arrowsmith (202) 482–5255. 

Welded Stainless Steel Pipe from South Korea A–580–810 (1st Review) ...................................................... Jacky Arrowsmith (202) 482–5255. 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings 

Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from India C–533–872 (1st Review) .............................................................. Jacky Arrowsmith (202) 482–5255. 

Suspended Investigations 

No Sunset Review of suspended 

investigations is scheduled for initiation 

in May 2022. 

Commerce’s procedures for the 

conduct of Sunset Review are set forth 

in 19 CFR 351.218. The Notice of 

Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Review 

provides further information regarding 

what is required of all parties to 

participate in Sunset Review. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), 

Commerce will maintain and make 

available a service list for these 

proceedings. To facilitate the timely 

preparation of the service list(s), it is 

requested that those seeking recognition 

as interested parties to a proceeding 

contact Commerce in writing within 10 

days of the publication of the Notice of 

Initiation. 

Please note that if Commerce receives 

a Notice of Intent to Participate from a 

member of the domestic industry within 

15 days of the date of initiation, the 

review will continue. 

Thereafter, any interested party 

wishing to participate in the Sunset 

Review must provide substantive 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 63 / Friday, April 1, 2022 / Notices 19075 

1See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service 

Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension of 

Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 

1See Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015, 

Public Law 114–27, 129 Stat. 362 (2015). 

comments in response to the notice of 

initiation no later than 30 days after the 

date of initiation. Note that Commerce 

has modified certain of its requirements 

for serving documents containing 

business proprietary information, until 

further notice.1

This notice is not required by statute 

but is published as a service to the 

international trading community. 

Dated: March 11, 2022. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2022–06924 Filed 3–31–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Opportunity To Request 

Administrative Review and Join 

Annual Inquiry Service List 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brenda E. Brown, Office of AD/CVD 

Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–4735. 

Background 

Each year during the anniversary 

month of the publication of an 

antidumping or countervailing duty 

order, finding, or suspended 

investigation, an interested party, as 

defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), may 

request, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213, that the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) conduct an 

administrative review of that 

antidumping or countervailing duty 

order, finding, or suspended 

investigation. 

All deadlines for the submission of 

comments or actions by Commerce 

discussed below refer to the number of 

calendar days from the applicable 

starting date. 

Respondent Selection 

In the event Commerce limits the 

number of respondents for individual 

examination for administrative reviews 

initiated pursuant to requests made for 

the orders identified below, Commerce 

intends to select respondents based on 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) data for U.S. imports during the 

period of review. We intend to release 

the CBP data under Administrative 

Protective Order (APO) to all parties 

having an APO within five days of 

publication of the initiation notice and 

to make our decision regarding 

respondent selection within 35 days of 

publication of the initiation Federal 

Register notice. Therefore, we 

encourage all parties interested in 

commenting on respondent selection to 

submit their APO applications on the 

date of publication of the initiation 

notice, or as soon thereafter as possible. 

Commerce invites comments regarding 

the CBP data and respondent selection 

within five days of placement of the 

CBP data on the record of the review. 

In the event Commerce decides it is 

necessary to limit individual 

examination of respondents and 

conduct respondent selection under 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act: 

In general, Commerce finds that 

determinations concerning whether 

particular companies should be 

‘‘collapsed’’ (i.e., treated as a single 

entity for purposes of calculating 

antidumping duty rates) require a 

substantial amount of detailed 

information and analysis, which often 

require follow-up questions and 

analysis. Accordingly, Commerce will 

not conduct collapsing analyses at the 

respondent selection phase of a review 

and will not collapse companies at the 

respondent selection phase unless there 

has been a determination to collapse 

certain companies in a previous 

segment of this antidumping proceeding 

(i.e., investigation, administrative 

review, new shipper review or changed 

circumstances review). For any 

company subject to a review, if 

Commerce determined, or continued to 

treat, that company as collapsed with 

others, Commerce will assume that such 

companies continue to operate in the 

same manner and will collapse them for 

respondent selection purposes. 

Otherwise, Commerce will not collapse 

companies for purposes of respondent 

selection. Parties are requested to: (a) 

Identify which companies subject to 

review previously were collapsed; and 

(b) provide a citation to the proceeding 

in which they were collapsed. Further, 

if companies are requested to complete 

a Quantity and Value Questionnaire for 

purposes of respondent selection, in 

general each company must report 

volume and value data separately for 

itself. Parties should not include data 

for any other party, even if they believe 

they should be treated as a single entity 

with that other party. If a company was 

collapsed with another company or 

companies in the most recently 

completed segment of a proceeding 

where Commerce considered collapsing 

that entity, complete quantity and value 

data for that collapsed entity must be 

submitted. 

Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for 

Administrative Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a 

party that requests a review may 

withdraw that request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review. The 

regulation provides that Commerce may 

extend this time if it is reasonable to do 

so. Determinations by Commerce to 

extend the 90-day deadline will be 

made on a case-by-case basis. 

Deadline for Particular Market 

Situation Allegation 

Section 504 of the Trade Preferences 

Extension Act of 2015 amended the Act 

by adding the concept of particular 

market situation (PMS) for purposes of 

constructed value under section 773(e) 

of the Act.1 Section 773(e) of the Act 

states that ‘‘if a particular market 

situation exists such that the cost of 

materials and fabrication or other 

processing of any kind does not 

accurately reflect the cost of production 

in the ordinary course of trade, the 

administering authority may use 

another calculation methodology under 

this subtitle or any other calculation 

methodology.’’ When an interested 

party submits a PMS allegation pursuant 

to section 773(e) of the Act, Commerce 

will respond to such a submission 

consistent with 19 CFR 351.301(c)(2)(v). 

If Commerce finds that a PMS exists 

under section 773(e) of the Act, then it 

will modify its dumping calculations 

appropriately. 

Neither section 773(e) of the Act nor 

19 CFR 351.301(c)(2)(v) set a deadline 

for the submission of PMS allegations 

and supporting factual information. 

However, in order to administer section 

773(e) of the Act, Commerce must 

receive PMS allegations and supporting 

factual information with enough time to 

consider the submission. Thus, should 

an interested party wish to submit a 

PMS allegation and supporting new 

factual information pursuant to section 

773(e) of the Act, it must do so no later 

than 20 days after submission of initial 

Section D responses. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1