alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 
  





 
 November 28, 2107 

Vince Estrada 
 Re: Employment Agreement Changes 

Dear Vince, 
 This letter serves to inform you that in
connection with the appointment of a new Chief Financial Officer of Connecture, Inc. effective December 4, 2017, you will be assigned to the new position of Executive Vice President, Corporate Development reporting to me. In accordance with
this change, the following terms of your existing employment arrangements with the Company shall be amended as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Base Salary. Effective January 1, 2018, your annualized Base Salary will be adjusted to $85,000 (eighty-five thousand dollars). 


 

	 	2.	Bonus Plan: 

  

	 	a.	2017: You will be eligible for the Bonus Plan payout, if any, for 2017’s fiscal year’s performance based on your target bonus of 50% of your 2017 annualized Base Salary of $300,000. 


 

	 	b.	2018 and thereafter: Your target bonus for Bonus Plans for fiscal year 2018 and thereafter will be based on 50% of your then current annualized Base Salary. 


 

	 	3.	Severance Package: 

  

	 	a.	2017/2018: If you are terminated before January 1, 2019, the base salary under the Severance Package shall be deemed to be $300,000. 


 

	 	b.	2019 and thereafter: If you are terminated on or after January 1, 2019, the base salary under the Severance Package shall be your then current annualized Base Salary. 


All other terms of your existing employment arrangements with the Company shall remain unchanged. 

Thank you for your continued support of the Company. Please acknowledge your agreement to the foregoing by countersigning this letter in the space provided
below. 
 Sincerely, 
  

	
	 /s/ Jeff Surges

	
	Jeff Surges
	Chief Executive Officer

 The forgoing terms and conditions are hereby accepted: 

 

									
	 /s/ Vincent E. Estrada
	 		 		 		 	Date: November 28, 2017
	Vincent E. Estrada
#### IN RE: LIFEWATCH TECHNOLOGIES LTD., FKA Card Guard Scientific Survival Ltd., Appellant

2017-1652

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

February 13, 2018

Laura A. Lydigsen, Brinks Gilson & Lione, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by Ralph Joseph Gabric, Gerald Peter Nichols.

Meredith Hope Schoenfeld, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, YA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by Nathan K. Kelley, Thomas W. Krause, Monica Barnes Lateef.

(Prost, Chief Judge, Reyna and Wallach, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 28, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40954 Summary Calendar RAMON ORNELAS, Petitioner-Appellant,
versus WARDEN DAVID JUSTICE, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:05-CV-49

-------------------- Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Petitioner-Appellant Ramon Ornelas, federal prisoner # 84960- 079, pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetamine and was sentenced to 262 months of imprisonment. Ornelas appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging the Bureau of Prisons’s (BOP) method of calculating his good time credit under 18 U.S.C. § 3624(b). Ornelas contends that the BOP has incorrectly interpreted § 3624(b) and that he is entitled to earn 54 days of good time credit per year, based on his term of imprisonment.

### 2

As Ornelas is proceeding under § 2241, he is not required to obtain a certificate of appealability (COA) to proceed on appeal. See Jeffers v. Chandler, 253 F.3d 827, 830 (5th Cir. 2001). In Sample v. Morrison, 406 F.3d 310, 312 (5th Cir. 2005), we held that
we lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over the appeal of a prisoner’s § 2241 petition that, like Ornelas’s, alleges that the BOP was miscalculating his good time credit under § 3624(b). We concluded that the prisoner, who was not yet eligible for release from prison, did not establish that he would sustain immediate injury that could be redressed by the relief requested. As such, his petition was not ripe for review. Id. Ornelas requests the same form of relief as the petitioner in Sample . Irrespective of whether Ornelas’s sentence is computed on the basis of the BOP’s interpretation of § 3624(b) or on the basis of his own interpretation, Ornelas is not entitled to release from prison. Thus, like the petitioner in Sample, Ornelas’s petition is
not ripe for review. Accordingly, we dismiss for lack of subjectmatter jurisdiction. Moreover, even if Ornelas’s request for relief
were not premature, his argument would be foreclosed by Moreland v. Federal Bureau of Prisons , 431 F.3d 180, 186 (5th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 1906 (2006). APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED.
CERTIFICATION                                                       Exhibit 31.1
Chief Executive Officer
I, Robert Moore, President and Chief Executive Officer certify that:

     1.  I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB of  Chadmoore
         Wireless Group, Inc;

     2.  Based on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement
         of a material fact or omit to state a material  fact  necessary to make
         the  statements  made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such
         statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
         by the report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other financial
         information  included in the  report,  fairly  present in all  material
         respects the financial  conditions,  the results of its  operations and
         cash flows of the issuer as of, and for,  the periods  presented in the
         report;

     4.  The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are
         responsible for  establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
         procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
         registrant and have:

         a.   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures to ensure that
              material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its
              consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to them by others within
              those  entities,  particularly  during  the  period  in which  the
              periodic reports are being prepared;

         b.   Evaluated  the   effectiveness  of  the  registrant's   disclosure
              controls and  procedures  as of a date within 90 days prior to the
              filing date of the report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c.   Presented in the report their  conclusions about the effectiveness
              of  the  disclosure   controls  and  procedures   based  on  their
              evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     5.  The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officers  and I have
         disclosed,  based on our most recent evaluation,  to the small business
         issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the board or directors (or
         persons fulfilling the equivalent function):

         a.   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
              or operation of internal  controls or  financial  reporting  which
              could adversely  affect the issuer's  ability to record,  process,
              summarize and report financial data; and

         b.   Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or
              other employees who have a significant  role in the small business
              issuer's internal controls or financial reporting; and


November 12, 2004

/s/ ROBERT W. MOORE
-----------------------
Robert W. Moore
Chief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Guina Senan LEON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-12229 Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(February 15, 2018)

Carol Herman, Lisa A. Hirsch, Madeleine R. Shirley, Emily M. Smachetti, U.S. *591Attorney Service — Southern District of Florida, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Leonardo Spitale, Jr., Leo Spitale Jr., PA, MIAMI, FL, for Defendant-Appellant

Before TJOFLAT, WILLIAM PRYOR and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Guiña Senan Leon appeals her below-guidelines sentence of 27 months of imprisonment, which was imposed following her plea of guilty to conspiring to defraud health care benefit programs by submitting false claims by wire transmissions. 18 U.S.C. §§ 1349, 1343. Leon argues that her sentence is substantively unreasonable. We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion when it sentenced Leon to a term 14 months below the low end of her advisory guideline range. Leon served as the straw owner of two medical clinics that submitted to private insurance companies more than $20 million in false claims for medical services ostensibly prescribed by doctors. With a total offense level of 22, which included a two-level reduction for her minor role, United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3B1.2(b) (Nov. 2016), Leon faced an advisory guideline range of 41 to 51 months of imprisonment. At the recommendation of the government, the district court varied downward and imposed a sentence of 27 months to account for Leon’s substantial assistance. *See id.*§ 5K1.1. Leon moved for a further reduction to account for her background and to achieve parity with the sentence imposed on another straw owner in a different scheme to defraud. Leon, who obtained degrees to serve as a nurse’s assistant and as a registered nurse and received $24,000 for serving as the registered officer and manager of the clinics, for obtaining occupational licenses, for signing checks and forms, and for cashing checks for the owner of the two clinics, offered no evidence that her comparator had a “similar ree-ord[ ] ... [and] ha[d] been found guilty of similar criminal conduct,” 28 U.S.C. § 991(b)(1)(B). *See United States v. Docampo,*573 F.3d 1091, 1101 (11th Cir. 2009). And the district court reasonably determined that a sentence of 27 months was required to deter further similar crimes, to reflect the seriousness of her offense, and provide just punishment for her role in the conspiracy. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Leon’s sentence, which is well below her statutory maximum penalty of 20 years, is reasonable. *See United States v. Croteau,*819 F.3d 1293, 1310 (11th Cir. 2016).

We AFFIRM Leon’s sentence.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 136 Considered and Passed House (CPH)]

  2d Session
H. J. RES. 136

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1999, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 16, 1998

  Mr. Livingston introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Appropriations

                            October 16, 1998

   The Committee on Appropriations discharged; considered and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1999, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That section 106(c) of Public 
Law 105-240 is further amended by striking ``October 16, 1998'' and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``October 20, 1998''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-10340.

#### Taylor *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-9769.

#### Boone *v.*MacLaren, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Golden River Resources Corporation (the “Company”) for the three months ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), the undersigned, Peter Lee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:




(1)           The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date: February 11, 2011








/s/ Peter LeePeter LeeDirector, Secretary andChief Financial Officer
(logo) CURCIO

+COHEN

  

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS PC 7 PENN PLAZA, SUITE 1500, NEW YORK NY 10001

TEL:212 557-9800 · FAX: 212 557-9819 · website: www.cwccpsfirm.com 

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  

Managing Member

Park Bridge Lender Services LLC

Montclair, NJ

  

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of 2015 Compliance by Park Bridge Lender Services LLC with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria (“Management’s Report”), that Park Bridge Lender Services LLC (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, excluding those criteria noted as not applicable (N/A) within Exhibit B to Management’s Report. The transactions covered by this report are only those transactions processed by the Company in its capacity as trust advisor or operating advisor for the asset backed securities transactions (the “Platform”) identified in Management’s Report. Reference Exhibit A to Management’s Report for the transactions covered by this examination. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, including examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of a selected sample of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria during the specified period. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our examination was not designed to detect material noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests, that may have affected the Company’s servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria identified in Exhibit B to Management’s Report with respect to the transactions identified in Exhibit A to Management’s Report as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, for the Platform, is fairly stated in all material aspects.

 

 /s/ Curcio & Cohen, CPA’S, P.C.

Curcio& Cohen, CPA’S, P.C.

New York, NY 

February 15, 2016

 

 

MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **CMBS Department**

 

MAC N9401-011

1055 10th Avenue SE

Minneapolis, MN 55414 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 BROADWAY

NEW YORK, New York 10036-8200

 

RE:  Annual Statement ofCompliance for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2014-C19, CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-C19

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of December 1, 2014 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the yearending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Gail Vannest

GAIL VANNEST

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
# Gazzetta ufficiale C 117A/3 ap

| | ISSN 1977-0944 |
| --- | --- |
| Gazzetta ufficiale
  dell’Unione europea | C 117A |
| | |
| Edizione in lingua italiana | Comunicazioni e informazioni | 61° anno3 aprile 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0944

Gazzetta ufficiale

dell’Unione europea

C 117A

Edizione in lingua italiana

Comunicazioni e informazioni

61° anno3 aprile 2018

---

| Numero d'informazione | Sommario | pagina |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Avvisi |
| | PROCEDIMENTI AMMINISTRATIVI |
| | Ufficio europeo di selezione del personale (EPSO) |
| 2018/C 117 A/01 | Addendum all’ elenco di riserva — Concorso generale EUIPO/AST/02/17 — Assistenti (AST 3) nel settore della proprietà intellettuale | 1 |

Numero d'informazione

Sommario

pagina

V   Avvisi

PROCEDIMENTI AMMINISTRATIVI

Ufficio europeo di selezione del personale (EPSO)

2018/C 117 A/01

Addendum all’ elenco di riserva — Concorso generale EUIPO/AST/02/17 — Assistenti (AST 3) nel settore della proprietà intellettuale

1

---

| IT | |
| --- | --- |

IT

---

V Avvisi

PROCEDIMENTI AMMINISTRATIVI

Ufficio europeo di selezione del personale (EPSO)

| 3.4.2018 | IT | Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea | CA 117/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2018

IT

Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea

CA 117/1

---

ADDENDUM ALL’ ELENCO DI RISERVA

Concorso generale EUIPO/AST/02/17

Assistenti (AST 3) nel settore della proprietà intellettuale

(2018/C 117 A/01)

| DE LA CUEVA CARABINE | Samantha |
| --- | --- |

DE LA CUEVA CARABINE

Samantha

L’elenco di riserva resta valida fino al 30 giugno 2021.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ERICK FINNEGAN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 470 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 19th day of December, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Deutsche Mortgage & AssetReceiving Corporation 

60 WALL ST

NEW YORK, New York 10005-2836

 

 

RE: Annual Statement ofCompliance for COMM 2014-CCRE21 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of December 1, 2014 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

/s/ Jeffrey Coletta

Jeffrey Coletta

Assistant Secretary

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 11701]

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Notice of receipt of request from Pakistan for cultural property protection.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Anne Compton, Cultural Heritage Center, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs: 202-632-6301;                         *culprop@state.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan made a request to the Government of the United States on May 4, 2021, under Article 9 of the 1970 UNESCO                     *Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property.*                     Pakistan's request seeks U.S. import restrictions on archaeological and ethnological material representing Pakistan's cultural patrimony. The Cultural Heritage Center website provides instructions for public comment and additional information on the request, including categories of archaeological and ethnological material that may be included in import restrictions:                     *https://eca.state.gov/​highlight/​cultural-property-advisory-committee-meeting-april-26-27-2022.*                     This notice is published pursuant to authority vested in the Assistant Secretary of State for Educational and Cultural Affairs and pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 2602(f)(1).                

Allison Davis, 

Executive Director, Cultural Property Advisory Committee, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2022-07123 Filed 4-4-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P