Reversed and Remanded and Opinion Filed June 16, 2015 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01582-CV BENEDICT OLUSOLA, M.D., Appellant V. NTEESHA S. SMITH, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-03380-A



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Lang, and Evans Opinion by Justice Bridges Appellant Benedict Olusola, M.D. filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code section 74.351. The tr ial court granted the motion, dismissed all of appellee Nteesha S. Smith’s claims regarding me dical services, but faile d to award attorney’s fees. On appeal, Olusola argues the trial court e rred by refusing to dismiss all of Smith’s claims because her remaining claims arise from his alleged medical malpractice and are therefore subsumed by chapter 74. Because the parties are familiar with the facts and the law is wellsettled, we issue this memorandum opinion. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.1. We reverse and remand to the trial court for the determination of reasonable atto rney’s fees and costs of court as required under Texas Civil Practice and Remedi es Code section 74.351(b)(1).–2– After Dr. Olusola performed several elective cosmetic surgeries on Smith, she filed an original and first amended petition against Dr. Olusola alleging claims for breach of contract, breach of warranty, negligence per se, professional liability, medical malpractice, fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation, fals e advertising, deceptive trade practices, fraud, and conspiracy to commit fraud. After Smith failed to serve an expe rt report, Dr. Olusola filed a motion to dismiss under section 74.351. The trial court signed an or der dismissing “Plaintiff’s claims regarding medical services.” It furthe r stated “IT IS THEREFORE ORDE RED that pursuant to Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 74.351 Plainti ff’s action against Benedict Olus ola, M.D. is DISMISSED.” However, the trial court did not award attorney’s fees. Dr. Olusola filed this interlocutory appeal pursuant to section 51.014(a)(9), which allows a party to appeal the denial of all or part of the relief sought by a motion under chapter 74. See T EX
. C IV
. P RAC
. & R EM
. C ODE A NN . § 51.014(a)(9) (West 2015). On appeal, Dr. Olusola argues the trial court dismissed Smith’s claims relate d to only medical malpractice and erred by not dismissing all of her claims becau se they all emanated from his care as a health care provider. Dr. Olusola also complains that the trial court fa iled to award the statutor ily mandated attorney’s fees. We begin by discussing the order granting Dr . Olusola’s motion to dismiss. Although he argues the order did not dispose of all of Smith’s claims against him, we do not agree. The order contains language that “pursuant to Tex. Ci v. Prac. & Rem. § 74.351 Plaintiff’s action against Benedict Olusola, M.D. is DISMISSED.” Thus, the order did in fact dismiss all of Smith’s claims against him. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp ., 39 S.W.3d 191, 200 (Tex. 2001) (“A judgment that disposes of all remaining parties and claims, based on the record in the case, is final, regardless of its language.” ). Accordingly, Dr. Olusola’s arguments on appeal are moot.–3– However, in his brief in this court and his motion to dismiss in the trial court, Dr. Olusola requested attorney’s fees and court costs pursuant to section 74.351(b)(1). The trial court failed to award the statutorily mandated attorney’s fees and costs. See T EX
. C IV
. P RAC
. & R EM
. C ODE A NN . § 74.351(b)(1) (West Supp. 2015) (if a defendant physician files a motion to dismiss after a plaintiff fails to timely serve an expert report, the court shall award the affected physician reasonable attorney’s fees and costs of court in curred). Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the trial court for the determination of reasona ble attorney’s fees a nd costs of court.

141582F.P05 /David L. Bridges/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE–4– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT BENEDICT OLUSOLA, M.D., Appellant
No. 05-14-01582-CV V. NTEESHA S. SMITH, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-03380-A. Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. Justices Lang and Evans participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is REVERSED and this cause is REMANDED to the trial court for the determination of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs of c ourt as required under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code section 74.351(b)(1). It is ORDERED that appellant BENEDICT OLUSOLA, M.D. recover his costs of this appeal from appellee NTEESHA S. SMITH.
Judgment entered June 16, 2015.