alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov]
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2014 5:17 PM
To: Wayland, Robertj
Cc: Culligan, Kevin; Elman, Barry Subject: One additional comment on RIN 2060-AR33

Hi Bob,

I wanted to share with you an additional interagency comment we’ve received: Addition of A More Stringent Option. Drawing on the abatement opportunities highlighted in prior comments, EPA should explicitly consider in th e preamble another alternative BSER option, in addition to the proposed option 1 and option 2. This third option would be more stringent than the others, and, together with the others, would provide a more complete range of options for public comment. Commenters recognize that these options will differ in their energy system and economic implications and could provide technica l information related to their evaluation and assessment.

Regards, Cortney
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES
CODE)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Chadmoore Wireless Group, Inc. (the "Company"), in
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March
31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-QSB
Report") that to his knowledge:

         (1)  the 10-QSB Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
              13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  the information contained in the 10-QSB Report fairly presents, in
              all material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.

Date:  May 14, 2003

/s/ ROBERT W. MOORE

Robert W. Moore, Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Chadmoore Wireless Group, Inc. and will be retained by Chadmoore
Wireless Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
# C_2012109EN.01001301.xml

| 14.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 109/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/13

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 17 February 2012 — Hassan v Council

(Case T-572/11 R)

(Interim measures - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Syria - Freezing of funds and economic resources - Application for interim measures - Lack of urgency - Weighing up of interests)

2012/C 109/29

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Samir Hassan (Damas, Syria) (represented by: É. Morgan de Rivery and E. Lagathu, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Kyriakopoulou and M. Vitsentzatos, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for interim measures, in particular, application for suspension of operation of Council Implementing Decision 2011/515/CFSP of 23 August 2011 implementing Decision 2011/273/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2011 L 218, p. 20) and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 843/2011 of 23 August 2011 implementing Regulation (EU) No 442/2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2011 L 218, p. 1) insofar as those texts refer to the applicant.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
# C_2006191EN.01S00301.xml

| 15.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/s3

---

NOTICE

NOTICE

On 17 August 2006, in Official Journal of the European Union C 193 A, the ‘Common catalogue of agricultural plant species — Fifth supplement to the 24th complete edition’ will be published.

Official Journal of the European Union

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/...). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see http://publications.europa.eu/others/sales_agents_en.html).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L,C,CA,CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at http://eur-lex.europa.eu.

Image

---
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 206 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con. Res.206
                                        Agreed to March 18, 1998        

                       One Hundred Fifth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  eight

                          Concurrent Resolution

 

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used from 8 o'clock 
ante meridian until 3 o'clock post meridian on April 23, 1998, for a 
ceremony as part of the commemoration of the days of remembrance of 
victims of the Holocaust. Physical preparations for the ceremony shall 
be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the Architect of 
the Capitol may prescribe.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
## NUMBER 13 - 2 3 - 00 090 - C V COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

IN R E TEODORO GUERRERO JR.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina 1
Relator Teodoro Guerrero Jr. filed a petition for writ of mandamus asserting through four issues that the trial court erred by concluding that real party in interest Ana Maria Gutierrez

- Salinas possesses standing in a suit regarding grandparent access to minor children. See T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN . § 102.004(a)(1).

1 See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 52.8(d) ( “ When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so. When granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in any other case

. ” ) ; id. R. 47.1 ( requiring the appellate courts to “ hand down a written opinion that is as brief as practicable but that addresses every issue raised and necessary to final dispositio n ” ); id. R. 47.4 (distinguishing opi nions and memorandum opinions).2

Mandamus is an extraordinary and discretionary remedy. See In re Allstate Indem. Co. , 6 22 S.W.3d 870, 883 (Tex. 2021) (orig. proceeding); In re Garza , 544 S.W.3d 836, 840 (Tex. 2018) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam); In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am

. , 148 S.W.3d 124, 138 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). The relator must show that (1) the trial court abused its discretion, and (2) the relator lacks an adequate remedy on appeal. In re USAA Gen. Indem. Co. , 624 S.W.3d 782, 787 (Tex. 2021) (orig. proceeding); In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am

. , 148 S.W.3d at 13 5

– 36; Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833,
839

– 40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). “ The relator bears the burden of proving these two requirements. ” In re H.E.B. Grocery Co. , 492 S.W.3d 300, 302 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam); Walker , 827 S.W.2d a t 840. Because a trial court ’ s temporary orders are not appealable, mandamus is an appropriate vehicle for review. See In re Derzapf , 219 S.W.3d 327, 334

– 35 (Tex. 2007) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam); In re Walser , 648 S.W.3d 442, 445 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2021, orig. pro ceeding ); In re Strickland

, 358 S.W.3d 818, 820 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 2012, orig. proceeding); In re Ostrofsky

, 112 S.W.3d 925, 928 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, orig. proceeding). The Court, having examined and full y considered the petition for writ of mandamus , the record, the response filed by Gutierrez

- Salinas , and the applicable law, is of the opinion that relator has not met his burden to obtain relief

. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

JAIME TIJERINA Justice
D elivered and filed on the 28th day of Apr il , 2023.
(logo)ncb

NationalCooperative Bank

 

2011 Crystal Drive

Suite, 800

Arlington, VA 22202

 

 

# February 6, 2018

 

Wells Fargo CommercialMortgage Securities, Inc. as Depositor

Attn: AJ Sfarra

375 Park Avenue, 2ndFloor

J0127-023

New York, NY 10152

 

RE:         Annual Statement as to Compliance

               WFCM 2014 LC18

 

Dear Sir/Madam:

 

Inaccordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement entered into in connectionwith the issuance of the Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2014-LC18, as an authorized officer of National Cooperative Bank, N.A.,formerly NCB, FSB (the “Co-op Special Servicer”), I hereby certify that:

 

a.       A review of the activities of the Co-opSpecial Servicer during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”)and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been madeunder my supervision.

 

b.       To the best of my knowledge, based onthese reviews, the Co-op Special Servicer has fulfilled all obligations under thisagreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Please note that the annualfinancial statement will be sent under separate cover on or before March 31,2018.

 

 

Best regards,

/s/ Karyn Mann

Karyn Mann

Senior Vice President, InvestorCompliance

National Cooperative Bank,N.A.
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 67

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 18, 1996

Referred to the Committee on House Oversight

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To authorize printing of the report of the Commission on

Protecting and Reducing Government Secrecy.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That there shall be printed as a Senate docu3 ment the report of the Commission on Protecting and Re4 ducing Government Secrecy.

5 SEC. 2. The document referred to in the first section

6 shall be—

7 (1) published under the supervision of the Sec8 retary of the Senate; and

9 (2) in such style, form, manner, and binding as

10 directed by the Joint Committee on Printing, after

11 consultation with the Secretary of the Senate.

12 The document shall include illustrations.
2

SCON 67 RFH

1 SEC. 3. In addition to the usual number of copies

2 of the document, there shall be printed the lesser of—

3 (1) 5,000 copies for the use of the Secretary of

4 Senate; or

5 (2) such number of copies as does not exceed

6 a total production and printing cost of $45,000.

Passed the Senate September 17, 1996.

Attest: KELLY D. JOHNSTON,

Secretary.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

          - [Docket No. 22-08]

Notice is given that a complaint has been filed with the Federal Maritime Commission (Commission) by Achim Importing Company Inc., hereinafter “Complainant”, against Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation, hereinafter “Respondent”. Complainant alleges that Respondent Yang Ming Marine is a Taiwanese company and a vessel-operating ocean common carrier.

                    Complainant alleges that Respondents violated 46 U.S.C. 41102(b), 41102(c), 41104(a)(2), 41104(a)(5), 41104(a)(9), and 41104(a)(10) with regard to refusal to provide space on their vessels. The full text of the complaint can be found in the Commission's Electronic Reading Room at                     *https://www2.fmc.gov/​readingroom/​proceeding/​22-08/​.*

This proceeding has been assigned to Office of Administrative Law Judges. The initial decision of the presiding office in this proceeding shall be issued by March 31, 2023, and the final decision of the Commission shall be issued by October 16, 2023.

William Cody,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-07177 Filed 4-5-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-02-P
No. 11-1281.

#### Forest Preserve District of Du Page County, Illinois *v.*First National Bank of Franklin Park et al.

Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-10443

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DEREK GLEN ADKINS,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:95-CV-2104-D

- - - - - - - - - -

February 21, 1997

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Derek Glen Adkins, #24400-077, filed a motion to vacate, set

aside, or correct a sentence by a person in federal custody under

28 U.S.C. § 2255 asserting that the district court erred in

accepting his guilty plea prior to determining his exact

sentence, that his counsel was ineffective for giving him

incorrect information with respect to the length of his sentence,

and that the Government had breached the plea agreement. Under
No. 96-10443

- 2 -

the law of the case doctrine, neither the district court on

remand nor the appellate court on a subsequent appeal may

reexamine the issues decided previously on appeal. Chevron

U.S.A., Inc. v. Traillour Oil Co., 987 F.2d 1138, 1150 (5th Cir.

1993); United States v. Singleton, 49 F.3d 129, 134 (5th Cir.),

cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 324 (1995). Issues decided on the

previous appeal, either expressly or by necessary implication,

are binding on remand and on any subsequent appeal. Id.

In the direct appeal of this conviction, this court held

that the district court did not err in accepting the guilty plea

because Adkins’s guilty plea was knowing and voluntary. United

States v. Adkins, No. 94-10120 (5th Cir. Dec. 28, 1994)

(unpublished). 

The Government did not breach the agreement not to seek

enhancement for prior drug offenses. Application of the career

offender provisions of the guidelines is not the same as seeking

an increase in the statutory range of punishment that an

enhancement entails. Id. 

The claim that his counsel was ineffective for inducing

Adkins to plead guilty with a prediction of his sentence is

without merit because Adkins has shown no prejudice. See Hill v.

Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 57-59 (1985). 

AFFIRMED.
| (logo) NTS NATIONAL

TAX SEARCH, LLC | 303 E Wacker Drive, Suite 900

Chicago, IL 60601

(312) 233-6440 |
|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

 

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND 

EXCHANGE COMMISSION'S REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

 

 

For the calendar year ending December 31, 2014, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for Wells Fargo Bank(the "Servicer" ). 

 

National Tax Search, LLC ("NTS") is responsible for assessing com p liance as of December 31, 2014 and for the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229 .1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations ( the "CFR"). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122 (d)(1)(ii), 1122 (d)l(iv), 1122 (d)2( ii ), 1122 (d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122 (d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria") are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTS's TaxQ system (the "Platform Transactions" ).

 

NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2014 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.

 

Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2014 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

 

National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer

 

/s/ Lori Eshoo 

Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO 

January 12, 2015
H. Con. Res. 67 Agreed to May 21, 1997

One Hundred Fifth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-seven

Concurrent Resolution

Authorizing the 1997 Special Olympics Torch Relay to be run through the Capitol

Grounds.

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF SPECIAL OLYMPICS

TORCH RELAY THROUGH CAPITOL GROUNDS.

On June 13, 1997, or on such other date as the Speaker of

the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of

the Senate may jointly designate, the 1997 Special Olympics Torch

Relay may be run through the Capitol Grounds, as part of the

journey of the Special Olympics torch to the District of Columbia

Special Olympics summer games at Gallaudet University in the

District of Columbia.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as may be

necessary to carry out section 1.
H. Con. Res. 67—2

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical preparations for the event authorized by section 1.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 113

JOINT RESOLUTION

Approving the location of a Martin Luther King,

Jr., Memorial in the Nation’s Capital.
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 113

JOINT RESOLUTION

Approving the location of a Martin Luther King, Jr.,

Memorial in the Nation’s Capital.

Whereas section 508 of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands

Management Act of 1996 (40 U.S.C. 1003 note; 110

Stat. 4157) authorized the Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity

to establish a memorial on Federal land in the District

of Columbia to honor Martin Luther King, Jr.;
2

•HJ 113 EH

Whereas section 6(a) of the Commemorative Works Act (40

U.S.C. 1006(a)) provides that the location of a commemorative work in the area described as Area I (within

the meaning of the Act) shall be deemed not authorized

unless approved by law not later than 150 days after notification to Congress that the Secretary of the Interior

recommends location of the commemorative work in Area

I; and

Whereas the Secretary of the Interior has notified Congress

of the recommendation of the Secretary that the memorial be located in Area I: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR., MEMORIAL.

4 The location of the commemorative work to honor

5 Martin Luther King, Jr., authorized by section 508 of the

6 Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of

7 1996 (40 U.S.C. 1003 note; 110 Stat. 4157), within Area

8 I is approved under section 6(a) of the Commemorative

9 Works Act (40 U.S.C. 1006(a)).

Passed the House of Representatives June 22, 1998.

Attest:

Clerk.
CHECKLIST FOR PREPARATION OF TIP SUBMITTAL' 

1 1. 1 A formal letter of submittal from the Governor requesting approval of the I 1 - 

72. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

A 

plan. , 

k description of the exterior boundaries of the reservation where the TIP 

applies. 

Evidence that the tribe has adopted the TIP into the Tribal code or body of 

regulations. This evidence shall include the date of adoption as well as the 

effective date of the plan if different from that of adoption. 

Documentation that DEQ has sufficient legal authority under Tribal law to 

adopt and enforce the TIP. 

A demonstration that DEQ has sufficient personnel (give names and 

positions) and resources to develop, implement and enforce the TIP elements 

for which the Tribe will have enforcement res~onsibilitv. 

7. 

8. 

1 - 

6 

Evidence that the Tribe followed all the procedural requirements of the \ 

T~ibe's law in conducting and completing the TIP. 

A copy of the public notice published in a newspaper with general 

9. 

I I a state (and if applic~ble any additional elements thatwere not submitted 1 1 

Identification of any previous determination(s) of eligibility by EPA for 

treatment as a state, (and submittal of any additional administrative 

reauirements for administering: TIP). 

circulation. 

Certification that a public hearing was held after the amropriate comment . g/ 

IC'l 0, 

--I 1. 

1 with the preGous application) ' 1 

I ;< 

1%. fi @ 2, ! ' I I ! 1 , I I I I 3; %I Urn1 r' '""8 d"" P*!! '"5" "5 ~#~~g~&~~4~$l~#~i~fi~d~~~~~f~@~~~~~~~A~k~~~$~/,~

period. ', . I %. ' 

Any public comment and DEQ ' s k-esponse. 

Identification of any previous detennination(s) of eligibility for treatment as 

' - - 

1 

1. A copy of actual regulations that contain emission limits and other control 

measures (including economic incentives such as fees, marketable permits, 

and auctions of emissions rights). The submittal shall be a copy of the 

official regulation signed, stamped, dated by the appropriate official 

2. 

-- - 

indicating-that it is fully enforceable. The effective date of the regulation 

shall be inhcated in the document itself. 

A CODV of en nit reauirements. 

1. 

2. 

1 Pursuant to CAA tj110, the TAR, and 40 C.F.R. Part 51, Appendix V 

Air quality data summaries_- 

Current and proj ected-e-&s~sji6s inventory 

1 3. 1 Dispersion modeling analysis <. - , 
1 4. 1 Documents that support use of certain control technologies or inventory 

5. 

- 

development. %D*, mS5 

Technical Support ~ochments