alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8272 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8272

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit physically impeding 
an ambulance from providing emergency medical treatment, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 16, 2020

   Mr. Higgins of Louisiana introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit physically impeding 
an ambulance from providing emergency medical treatment, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Emergency Services Access Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON BLOCKING AMBULANCES AT HOSPITAL ENTRANCES.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 65 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 1370. Blocking ambulances at hospital entrances
    ``Whoever travels in interstate or foreign commerce or uses any 
facility of interstate or foreign commerce, and thereafter knowingly 
physically impedes an ambulance or other emergency vehicle, or an 
emergency medical technician assigned to such vehicle from--
            ``(1) providing treatment to an individual in need of 
        emergency medical treatment; or
            ``(2) accessing the entrance to a hospital, in the case of 
        a vehicle transporting an individual in need of emergency 
        medical treatment,
shall be imprisoned for not more than 5 years or fined under this 
title, or both, or if death results, imprisoned for any term of years 
or for life, or fined under this title, or both.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for such chapter is 
amended by adding at the end the following:

``1370. Blocking ambulances at hospital entrances.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from (a) 
Financial Statements as of September 30, 1997 and for the six month period 
then ended and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 
(b) Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          67,266
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,006,171
<ALLOWANCES>                                   473,103
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               780,690
<PP&E>                                       1,580,950
<DEPRECIATION>                                 324,293
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,941,541
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,885,412
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,500,000
<COMMON>                                        15,335
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,686,284)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,941,541
<SALES>                                      3,764,169
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,764,169
<CGS>                                        4,243,924
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,243,924
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,182,867
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             177,876
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,827,696)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,827,696)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,827,696)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 21.1


                  SUBSIDIARIES OF UNITED MERIDIAN CORPORATION



                                                          JURISDICTION
                    NAME                               IN WHICH ORGANIZED


      UMC Petroleum Corporation                     Delaware                 
      UMC Resources Canada Ltd.                     British Columbia, Canada 
      UMC Cayman Islands Corporation                Cayman Islands           
      UMC Equatorial Guinea Corporation             Delaware                 
      UMC Pipeline Corporation                      Delaware                 
      UMIC Cote d'Ivoire Corporation                Delaware                  
      United Meridian International Corporation     Delaware
      Norfolk Holdings Inc.                         Delaware 
      UMIC (CI-01) Corporation                      Delaware
      UMIC (CI-02) Corporation                      Delaware
      UMIC (CI-12) Corporation                      Delaware
      UMC Bangladesh Corporation                    Delaware
      UMC Pakistan Corporation                      Delaware
      Big Sky Gas Marketing Corporation             Delaware
      UMIC (CI-105) Corporation                     Delaware
      UMC Ghana Corporation                         Delaware
      Havre Pipeline Company, LLC                   Texas
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 32

JOINT RESOLUTION

To consent to certain amendments enacted by the

ian Homes Commission Act, 1920.Legislature of the State of Hawaii to the Hawai-
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 32

JOINT RESOLUTION

To consent to certain amendments enacted by the Legislature

of the State of Hawaii to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, as required by section 4 of the Act entitled ‘‘An
2

•HJ 32 EH

1 Act to provide for the admission of the State of Hawaii

2 into the Union’’, approved March 18, 1959 (73 Stat. 4),

3 the United States consents to the following amendments

4 to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920, adopted

5 by the State of Hawaii in the manner required for State

6 legislation:

7 (1) Act 339 of the Session Laws of Hawaii,

8 1993.

9 (2) Act 37 of the Session Laws of Hawaii,

10 1994.

Passed the House of Representatives March 11,

1997.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Golden River Resources Corporation (the “Company”) for the six months ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), the undersigned, Joseph Gutnick, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:




(1)           The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities




Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.










Date: February 11, 2011/s/ Joseph I. GutnickJoseph I. GutnickChairman of the Board, President andChief Executive Officer
#### Jose Carranza CARRILLO, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 13-74327

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted November 15, 2017 *

Filed November 20, 2017

*531Mackenzie W. Mackins, Mackins & Mac-kins, LLP, Sherman Oaks, CA, for Petitioner

James A. Hurley, Attorney, OIL, DOJ— U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *531*See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Carranza Carrillo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order by the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) reinstating his 2006 expedited removal order. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Our review of DHS’ reinstatement order is “limited to confirming the agency’s compliance with the reinstatement regulations.” *Garcia de Rincon v. Dep’t of Homeland Sec.,*539 F.3d 1133, 1137 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The DHS did not err in issuing Carranza Carrillo’s reinstatement order where Carranza Carrillo does not dispute his al-ienage, and the record shows he was subject to a prior order of removal and that he illegally reentered the United States subsequent to that order. *See id.*(court’s jurisdiction over a reinstatement order is limited to reviewing “three discrete inquiries an immigration officer must make in order to reinstate a removal order: (1) whether the petitioner is an alien; (2) whether the petitioner was subject to a prior removal order, and (3) whether the petitioner re-entered illegally.” (citation omitted)).

We reject Carranza Carrillo’s contention that the reinstatement order is defective where the record contains Carranza Carrillo’s prior order of expedited removal.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Carranza Carrillo’s collateral attack on his underlying 2006 expedited removal order. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(e)(2); *see Garcia de Rincon,*539 F.3d at 1138 (“whatever relief might be gained by the operation of § 1252(a)(2)(D) and the “gross miscarriage” standard, it is unavailable [to the petitioner] because [his] underlying removal order is an *expedited*removal order that is subject to additional jurisdictional bars — 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(A) and 1252(e).”).

Finally, Carranza Carrillo’s motion to supplement the record (Docket Entry No. 47) is denied.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
No. 11-1211.

#### Pueschel *v.*National Air Traffic Controllers Assn.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-77509 and File No. 333-79605) of Navigant
International, Inc. of our report dated February 8, 2002 relating to the
consolidated financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report to
Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Denver, Colorado
March 26, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         863,703
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  366,777
<ALLOWANCES>                                    16,600
<INVENTORY>                                     84,762
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,615,939
<PP&E>                                       6,741,391
<DEPRECIATION>                                 820,387
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,978,138
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,136,964
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           24,218
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           139
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,978,138
<SALES>                                        516,092
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               516,092
<CGS>                                          182,873
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,662,657
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               652,581
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             460,370
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,799,146)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2 Certification of CFO Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act
 Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 I, S. Douglas Post, certify that:
 I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of BF Enterprises, Inc.;Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andDisclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and
1The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andAny fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.**BF ENTERPRISES, INC.**Date:  November 12, 2004
By:
/s/ S. Douglas PostVice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMO
SENTRON CORPORATION'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH
29, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                          27,498
<SECURITIES>                                     6,681
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,667
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,667
<INVENTORY>                                     10,619
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,257
<PP&E>                                           3,680
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,598
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 106,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,074
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            99
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,376
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   106,903
<SALES>                                         17,981
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,981
<CGS>                                           11,085
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,085
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   436
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    32
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  68
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,174
<INCOME-TAX>                                       826
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,348
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,348
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10(b)


CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY


Non-Employee Director Compensation for Calendar 2018
Board and Committee Retainer for Calendar 2018    
$119,000 shall be paid in cash
$129,000 shall be paid in shares of Campbell stock
Additional Retainers for Chairman of the Board, Committee Chairs and Audit Committee Members
In addition to the above Board and Committee retainer, the following amounts shall be paid 50% in cash and 50% in shares of Campbell stock:
	
		
	$350,000
	Chairman of the Board

	$25,000
	Audit Committee chair

	$20,000
	Compensation and Organization Committee chair

	$15,000
	Finance Committee chair

	$15,000
	Governance Committee chairs

	$7,500
	Audit Committee members (excluding the Audit Committee chair)




Prior to the beginning of a calendar year, a non-employee director may elect to (i) receive shares of Campbell stock in lieu of the cash portion of any retainer (such election to be made in 10% increments) and/or (ii) defer all or a portion of any cash or stock retainer in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Campbell Soup Company Supplemental Retirement Plan.
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Long Island Physician Holdings
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Paul Kolker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Paul Kolker
--------------------------------
Paul Kolker,
President, Chairman of the Board
(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: _______________________

      This certification accompanies the above-described Report on Form 10-Q
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except
to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


                                       23
#### UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Clarence C. GARRETSON Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-2316

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: January 12, 2018

Filed: January 23, 2018

Kyra E. Jenner, Candace L. Taylor, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Arkansas, Fort Smith, AR, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Clarence C. Garretson, Pro Se

Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

*418PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, Clarence Garretson challenges the sentence the district court1 imposed following his guilty plea to transporting minors in interstate commerce with the intent to engage in criminal sexual activity. His counsel has moved to withdraw and submitted a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), discussing the reasonableness of the sentence. Garretson has filed a pro se supplemental brief, in which he argues that the district court did not properly consider the 18 U.S.C. § 3663(a) factors; and that the statute of conviction provides for a sentence that is “grossly disproportionate” to the offense, and is overly broad.

As to the reasonableness of the sentence, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion, as it properly considered the section 3553(a) factors; there was no indication that it overlooked a relevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing relevant factors, see United States v. David, 682 F.3d 1074, 1077 (8th Cir. 2012) (standard of review); United States v. Wohlman, 651 F.3d 878, 887 (8th Cir. 2011); and the sentence was within the Guidelines range, see United States v. Gallaway, 762 F.3d 754, 760 (8th Cir. 2014).

As to Garretson’s pro se arguments, we conclude that a life sentence is not grossly disproportionate to the crimes, given the number of victims, the severity of the abuse, and the span of time over which the abuse occurred, see United States v. Scott, 610 F.3d 1009, 1017 (8th Cir. 2010) (standard of review); and that the statute is not overly broad, see United States v. Billiot, 785 F.3d 1266, 1269 (8th Cir. 2015) (standard of review).

We have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm,

1

. The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas.