alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANILA MALANI,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 05-73630

Agency No. A095-882-703

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted August 5, 2013 

Pasadena, California

Before: TALLMAN, CLIFTON, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Anila Malani, a native and citizen of Albania, petitions for review of a

decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals adopting and affirming an

immigration judge’s denial of her applications for asylum, withholding of removal,

and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).

FILED

AUG 07 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Malani argues that we have jurisdiction to review the Board’s finding that

she failed to timely file her asylum application as required by 8 U.S.C. §

1158(a)(2)(B) because of the immigration judge’s conceded error in finding that

she filed her application on July 27, 2002, rather than June 27, 2002, the date

stamped on her application. Even were we to hold that we have jurisdiction

pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D), and that Malani has met her burden of

demonstrating by clear and convincing evidence that she filed her application

within one year of her arrival in the United States, Malani’s asylum claim fails on

the merits because substantial evidence supports the immigration judge’s adverse

credibility finding.

The immigration judge provided “specific cogent reason[s]” for his adverse

credibility finding, and Malani has therefore failed to demonstrate that “any

reasonable factfinder would necessarily conclude that [she] is eligible for relief

from deportation.” Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1042–43 (9th Cir. 2001). 

Malani’s petition for review of the adverse credibility finding as it relates to her

asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT claims is denied.

Malani asserts that counsel at her removal hearing provided ineffective

assistance of counsel. We decline to address Malani’s argument because she has

not raised it before the Board, see Martinez-Zelaya v. INS, 841 F.2d 294, 296 (9th

2
Cir. 1988), nor has she complied with the procedural requirements established by

the Board in Matter of Lozada, 19 I. & N. Dec. 637 (BIA 1988). Counsel’s alleged

ineffective assistance is not “obvious and undisputed on the face of the record,”

therefore compliance with Matter of Lozada’s procedural requirements is not

excused and we lack jurisdiction to review it. See Reyes v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 592,

596–97 (9th Cir. 2004). 

Petition DENIED in part and DISMISSED in part.

 

3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM OCTOBER 31,
1996 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                           7,063
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,957
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,414
<PP&E>                                           1,504
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,918
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,848
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,255
<OTHER-SE>                                    (14,758)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,918
<SALES>                                          2,757
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,852
<CGS>                                               11
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      932
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,432
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  35
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,417)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,417)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,417)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.68)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Acro Biomedical Co., Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Pao-Chi Chu, chief executive officer of the Company, and acting chief financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                      |     |                                                         | 
|--------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Date: January16, 2018 | By: | /s/Pao-Chi Chu                                          | 
|                      |     | Pao-Chi Chu                                             | 
|                      |     | Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer     | 
|                      |     | (Principal Executive, Financial and
Accounting Officer) |
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

               AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE CREDIT TERMS AND CONDITIONS

     This Amendment No. 2 to Credit Terms and Conditions ("Amendment") dated May
12, 1998, to that certain Credit Terms and Conditions, dated as of April 2, 1997
(as modified, amended and supplemented to the date hereof, the "Agreement"), is
entered into by and between Imperial Bank, as lender, and National Insurance
Group, as borrower.

     All capitalized terms used, but not defined herein, shall have the same
meaning as set forth in the Agreement.

     In consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties
hereby agree that the Agreement is hereby amended as follows.

     1.   Section B4 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated to read in
its entirety as follows:

     "4.  NET WORTH. Maintain, on a consolidated basis, a tangible net worth
     (meaning the excess of all assets, excluding and value for good will other
     than the goodwill for New Arts Acquisition, Inc. which shall be included,
     trademarks, patents, copyrights, leaseholds, organization expense and other
     similar intangible items, over its liabilities) of not less than twenty
     five million dollars ($25,000,000) to increase each fiscal year end,
     commencing with the fiscal year end 1998, by Borrower's net income (without
     deduction for losses), minus dividends paid."

     2.   Except as provided herein, the Agreement remains unchanged and in full
force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date
first written above.

National Insurance Group                       Imperial Bank




By: /s/ ROBERT P. BARBAROWICZ                  By: /s/ JOSEPH MCCARTHY
   ----------------------------                ----------------------------
   Robert P. Barbarowicz                           Joseph McCarthy,
   Executive Vice President                        Vice President
   General Counsel & Secretary
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________ No. 95-50864

_____________________

GERALD HALL, Plaintiff

versus ROY BENTON, ET AL., Defendants,
JESS THOMPSON; PEGGY THOMPSON; FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, LODGE 11, Defendants-Appellees,
RON BENTON; CHARLIE BLANKENSHIP; BOBBY WELBORN; RON SARTOR, Defendants-Third Party Plaintiffs-Appellees,

versus ED KREVIT; RUSTY HILL; GARY PAINTER, Sheriff of Midland County, Texas, Third Party DefendantsAppellants.

_________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(M0-94-CV-129)

_________________________________________________________________ October 7, 1996 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, SMITH and DUHÈ, Circuit Judges.* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

2 PER CURIAM: *
Ed Krevit, Rusty Hill, and Gary Painter, Third Party DefendantsAppellants, appeal the district court’s rejection, at this stage of the proceedings, of their assertion of qualified immunity from the claims of Third Party Plaintiffs. Having considered the briefs and oral arguments of counsel, and pertinent parts of the record, and finding that genuine issues of material fact currently exist, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction and the appeal is, accordingly,
DISMISSED.
```

[Federal Register: April 9, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 68)]
[Notices]               
[Page 18253]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr09ap10-142]                         


[[Page 18253]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

 
Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending March 27, 
2010

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation 
Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing 
proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 
days after the filing of the application.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2010-0077.
    Date Filed: March 26, 2010.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: Mail Vote 630--Resolution 010t, Composite Resolutions 300, 
301, Baggage Allowance Weight System, Baggage Allowance Piece System 
(Memo 1565).
    Intended Effective Date: 1 April 2010.

Renee V. Wright,
 Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2010-8110 Filed 4-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 D0 13 1 . W I LLI AM T. MURRAY v . STATE.

W i l l i am M u rray s eek s t o ap p eal t h e tri al co urt ’ s o rd er d en y i n g h i s m ot i o n fo r

an o u t o f t i m e ap p eal

. An o rd er d en y i n g a m ot i o n fo r an o u t o f ti m e ap p eal

, h o wev er,

i s a d i rect l y ap p eal ab l e o rd er. See, e.g

., Lu n s f or d v. S t a t e

, 2 3 7 Ga. Ap p. 6 9 6 (5 1 5

SE2 d 1 9 8) (1 9 9 9).

Wh e n a p art y ap p l i es fo r d i s cret i o n ary rev i ew o f a d i rect ly ap p eal ab l e o r d e r

,

we g ran t t h e ap pl icat i o n u nd er OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (j). A cco rd i n g l y

, t hi s ap pl i cat i o n i s

h ereb y GRANTED. M u rray s hal l h av e 1 0 d ay s fro m t h e d a t e o f t h is o rd er t o fi le a

n o t i ce o f ap p eal wi t h t h e tri al co u rt

. If h e h as al read y fi l ed a n o t i c e o f ap p eal fro m

t h e o rd er at i s s u e, h e n eed n ot fi l e a s eco n d no t i ce. Th e t ri al co u rt i s i n s t r u ct ed to

i n cl u d e a co p y

o f t h i s o rd er i n t h e ap p el l at e reco rd

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 12/04/2014 December 04, 2014
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                       Consent of Independent Accountants

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Amendment No. 5
to Registration Statement on Form S-4 of our report dated April 16, 2002, except
as to Notes 21 and 22 to the consolidated financial statements, which are as of
November 18, 2002, relating to the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule of Hanover Compressor Company, which appears in
Hanover Compressor Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A-2 for the year ended
December 31, 2001. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading
"Experts" in such Registration Statement.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Houston, Texas
February 7, 2003
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bay Resources Ltd (the
Company) for the three months ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), the
undersigned, Joseph Gutnick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| |                                                                                                                             
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | a)     The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



| |                                                                                                                                                           
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | b)     The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Date: May 20, 2003

/s/ Joseph I. GutnickName: Joseph I. GutnickTitle:   Chairman of
the Board,President and Chief Executive
Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              OCT-05-1997
<CASH>                                         30,522 
<SECURITIES>                                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                  14,910 
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0 
<INVENTORY>                                         0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               45,969       
<PP&E>                                         29,028      
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                488,047      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          13,528    
<BONDS>                                       125,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<COMMON>                                          333 
<OTHER-SE>                                    343,147       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  488,047         
<SALES>                                         2,103          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               43,885          
<CGS>                                             704          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     704          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              2,066       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                22,575       
<INCOME-TAX>                                    6,919      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                   15,656 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .45 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0 
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

JOSEPH FRANCESKI AND BERNADETTE 

FRANCESKI, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE 

ESTATE OF MICHAEL FRANCESKI,

Petitioners

v.

LINDE CORPORATION AND RAIL-TRAIL 

COUNCIL OF NORTHEASTERN 

PENNSYLVANIA, INC.,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 13 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
# C_2021081EN.01000701.xml

| 10.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 81/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 81/7

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant positions at its meeting on 21 September 2020 at 10.30-13.00 (CEST (1)) concerning a draft decision concerning Case AT.40608 – Broadcom

Rapporteur: Lithuania

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 81/07)

(1)

The Advisory Committee (12 Member States) shares the Commission's concerns expressed in its draft Decision under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement, as communicated to the Advisory Committee on 7 September 2020.

(2)

The Advisory Committee (12 Member States) agrees with the Commission that the proceedings can be concluded by means of a decision pursuant to Article 9(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003, as described in the draft Decision.

(3)

The Advisory Committee (12 Member States) agrees with the Commission that the offered final commitments are suitable, necessary and proportionate and should be made legally binding, as set out in the draft Decision.

(4)

The Advisory Committee (12 Member States) agrees with the Commission’s draft Decision that, in light of the offered commitments, there are no longer grounds for action by the Commission as regards the concerns as set out in the draft Decision, without prejudice to Article 9(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003.

(5)

The Advisory Committee (12 Member States) recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

---

(1)  Central European Summer Time (i.e. Brussels time).

1

---
#### COM. v. MARCHESE, G.

39 MDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/11/2017

CP-41-CR-0000629-2015, CP-41-CR-0001773-2015 (Lycoming)

Affirmed
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-1939

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Southern * District of Iowa. Gregory Joseph Halter, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: June 15, 1998 Filed: July 6, 1998

___________ Before BEAM, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Gregory Joseph Halter entered a plea of guilty to a drug distribution charge, a money l aundering charge and an 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) firearms charge. He now brings a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, seeking to vacate his sentence on the firearm conviction in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Bailey v. United States , 516 U.S. 13 7 (1995 ). Because of the Supreme Court's recent decision in Bousley v. United States , 118 S. Ct. 1604 (1998), we reverse and remand this matter to the district court fo r further consideration.-2-

A true copy. ATTEST: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
(logo)**Prudential**

**PrudentialAsset Resources**

PGIMReal Estate Finance

2100Ross Avenue, Suite 2500, Dallas TX 75201

Tel214-777-4500

 

Abusiness of Prudential Financial, Inc.

 

WellsFargo Bank, National Association

CommercialMortgage Servicing

MACD1086

550South Tryon Street, 14th Floor

Charlotte,North Carolina 28202

Attention:Asset Manager

 

 

RE:         **WFRBS 2014-C25**

Period: **January 1, 2018 to December 31,2018(the "Reporting Period")**

 

 

**Annual ComplianceStatement**

 

I, Joni Brown-Haas, in my capacity asPresident and Managing Director of Prudential Asset Resources, Inc. (the"Company") hereby certify with regard to the Company's role asSub-Servicer under the Sub-Servicing Agreement, (the "Agreement")dated as of December 1, 2014, pertaining to the above-referenced certificates,that:

 

       (i)           areview of the activities of the Company under the Agreement  during theperiod noted above, and  of the performance of the Company under theAgreement during the  relevant  period  has been made under mysupervision, and

 

     (ii)           to thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled all itsobligations under the Agreement throughout the relevant period, and

 

   (iii)           to thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled itsobligations under its sub-servicing agreement in all material respects, and

 

    (iv)           theCompany has maintained an effective internal control system over the servicingof mortgage loans including the Loans serviced by the Company, and

 

     (v)           theCompany has not received any notice regarding qualification or challenging thestatus of the Lower Tier REMIC or the Upper Tier REMIC as a REMIC, from the IRSor any other governmental agency or body.

 

Effectiveas of February 22, 2019

 

 

/s/Joni Brown-Haas

JoniBrown-Haas

Presidentand Managing Director

PrudentialAsset Resources, Inc.
No. 11-10375.

#### Maldonado-Torres *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.