alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-1021



		

			EXHIBIT 10.21

		


		

			 

		




		
			DRESSER-RAND GROUP INC.
		

		
			GRANT NOTICE FOR 2008 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
RESTRICTED STOCK
		

		
			FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Dresser-Rand Group Inc. (the "Company"), hereby grants to Grantee named below the number of Common Shares (the "Restricted Shares") specified below (the “Award”), upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Grant Notice, the Dresser-Rand Group Inc. 2008 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) and the Standard Terms and Conditions (the “Standard Terms and Conditions”) adopted under such Plan and provided to Grantee, each as amended from time to time.    Grantee must formally accept the grant of Restricted Shares within 90 days following the Grant Date specified in the Grant Notice; if Grantee fails to do so, Grantee’s Restricted Shares will be forfeited and Grantee will have no further rights with respect to such Restricted Shares.    Each Restricted Share is subject to the conditions set forth in this Grant Notice, the Plan and the Standard Terms and Conditions.    This Award is granted pursuant to the Plan and is subject to and qualified in its entirety by the Standard Terms and Conditions.  The Standard Terms and Conditions may be accessed through Grantee’s personal Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Benefit Access® account (www.benefitaccess.com)  in the Plan Documents section.
		

		
			 
		

			
					
						Name of Grantee:

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Grant Date:

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Number of restricted stock units subject to the Award:

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Vesting Schedule:

					
					
						 

				



		
			By accepting this Grant Notice, Grantee acknowledges that he or she has received and read, and agrees that this Award shall be subject to, the terms of this Grant Notice, the Plan and the Standard Terms and Conditions.
		

		
			 
		

		
			DRESSER-RAND GROUP INC.
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			By: /s/ VINCENT R. VOLPE JR.
		

		
			Name: Vincent R. Volpe Jr.
		

		
			Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco BARAHONA, a/k/a Poncho, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco Barahona, a/k/a Poncho, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-7071, No. 17-7099

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 19, 2017

Decided: January 3, 2018

Francisco Barahona, Appellant Pro Se. Arun G. Rao, Assistant United States At*783torney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee,

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM;

Francisco Barahona seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and denying him a certificate of appealability. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Barahona has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
No. 11-10233.

#### Suscal-Ramon *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit
      31  **CERTIFICATION**
  **C-BASS
        Trust 2006-CB9**
 
 I,
        Elizabeth Folk, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Litton
        Loan
        Servicing LP, certify that:
 
 1.  I
        have
        reviewed the report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to
        be
        filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K
        of C-BASS Trust 2006-CB9 (the “Exchange Act Periodic
        Reports”);
 
 2.  Based
        on
        my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a whole, do not
        contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
        fact
        necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
        which
        such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
        by
        this report;
 
 3.  Based
        on
        my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required
        to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included
        in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;
 
 4.  I
        am
        responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based
        on
        my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer
        compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation
        AB,
        and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the servicers
        have
        fulfilled their obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement in
        all
        material respects; and
 
 5.  All
        of
        the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
        securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance
        with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
        in
        this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
        Rules
        13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except
        as
        otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
        described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
        10-K.
 
 In
        giving
        the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided
        to me
        by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York (custodian) and
        LaSalle Bank National Association (trustee).
 
 
 Date:  March
        29,
        2007
  /s/
          Elizabeth Folk
 Elizabeth
        Folk
 Senior
        Vice President and
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 Litton
        Loan Servicing LP
 (senior
          officer in charge of the servicing function)
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 133 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 133

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1999, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 9, 1998

  Mr. Livingston introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1999, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That section 106(c) of Public 
Law 105-240 is amended by striking ``October 9, 1998'' and inserting in 
lieu thereof ``October 12, 1998''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DAVID LESLIE BARKSDALE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 103 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 20th day of September, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Threat Reduction Agency 

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  DTRA Leadership             
  -  DTRA History             
  -  Mission             
  -  Strategic Initiatives             
  -  Foreign Malign Influence             
  -  Agency Overview Brief (pdf)             
  -  Agency Financial Report 
-  Careers & Opportunities    -  Your Civilian Career             
  -  Your Military Career             
  -  Welcome Aboard 
-  Business    -  DTRA Contract Award Data             
  -  Office of Small Business             
  -  Mentor Protege Program 
-  News & Media    -  Press Center 
-  Contact Us		 
-  Joint Operations Center		 

# DTRA FOIA Reading Room Archive

# FOIA Request 21-005 

##                 COVID Information            

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

## Related Links

21-005 PDF

COVID
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2016-4280 Directorate ID: 2016-SW-008-AD

Helicopter Model: Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Model S-92A helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 80 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to detect an incorrectly installed locking 

mechanism, which if not corrected, could result in a loose jam nut, failure of a main rotor and tail 

rotor control pushrod (pushrod), loss of main rotor or tail rotor flight control, and consequent loss 

of helicopter control.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $2,500 per pushrod replacement

Minimal parts cost to repair a pushrod

Labor per Helicopter

(2 work hours X $85 for 

inspection)

(2 work hours X $85 for 

replacement)

(2 work hours X $85 for 

repair)

$170

$170

$170

Other

(Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $170 for the inspection

$2,670 per pushrod replacement

$170 per pushrod repair

Total U.S. Fleet Cost $13,600 for the inspection

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Blaine Williams
z Home

z Press Releases

z Contact Us

z Site Map

z About Us



# Site Map NMED Home Page

Search Quick Links...



## Department Organization Office of the Secretar y Cabinet Secretary Communications Director Chief Information Officer General Counsel Press Releases Pollution Prevention Program Public Notice Border Programs Administrative Services Budgets Bureau Financial Services Personnel Services Bureau Purchasing Bureau Environmental Protection Air Quality Bureau Occupational Health & Safety Solid Waste Bureau Petroleum Storage Tank Bureau Office of Finance and Budget Field Operations Page 1 of 3 Site Map

1/6/2011 file://H:\6PD\6PD-L\NM SIP-FIP Docket\Echo of NMED web site as of 12-21-10\sitema p

. ...District Offices Radiation Control Bureau Information Technology Division Chief Information Officer & IT Division Director Information Technology Services Bureau Water & Waste Mgmt DOE Oversight Surface Water Quality Bureau Ground Water Quality Hazardous Waste Bureau Water and Wastewater Infrastructure Development Construction Programs Drinking Water Bureau 

## NMED Internal Links
N MED Mission Statement Regulations & Laws Standards Programs Press Releases Pollution Prevention Program Public Notices Meetings & Hearings Special Reports Permits & Licensing Groundwater Spill Alert Border Programs Green Gazette Newsletter Liquid Waste Program Green Zia 

## NM State Government Links
NM State Government Portal Governor Bill Richardson Lt. Governor Diane Denish General Services Dept. State Engineers Office (OSE) Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Game & Fish Dept. of Health Homeland Security and Emergency Management State Land Office NM Geographic Info Council Page 2 of 3 Site Map

1/6/2011 file://H:\6PD\6PD-L\NM SIP-FIP Docket\Echo of NMED web site as of 12-21-10\sitema p

. ...p age last update d 01/04/2010 2009 New Mexico Environment Department NMsphere

- Emergency Response Education Resource Geographical Info Systems Prog Interstate Stream Commission Dept. of Transportation 

## US Government Links
Customs & Border Protection Dept of Agriculture Dept of Energy Environmental Protection Agency Census Bureau Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Reclamation Center of Disease Control and Prevention Dept of Homeland Security Dept of Transportation Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Fish and Wildlife Service Food and Drug Administration Forest Service Geological Survey Health and Human Services Dept of Interior Geospatial

- Intelligence Agency Nuclear Security Administration Nuclear Energy, Science & Technology Nuclear Regulatory Commission Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Occupational Safety & Health Administration Office of Science & Technology State Department STORET Data Warehouse (EPA) Superfund Basic Research Program White House Page 3 of 3 Site Map

1/6/2011 file://H:\6PD\6PD-L\NM SIP-FIP Docket\Echo of NMED web site as of 12-21-10\sitema p

. ...
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

May 24, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129153 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, KARLENE S. HARBOUR, as Personal Justices 

Representative of the Estate of KEVIN

DANIEL HARBOUR, Deceased,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 129153 

 COA: 252857 

Macomb CC: 2000-003451-NH 

CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES,

INC., a/k/a CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL 

SYSTEMS, INC., 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 24, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0517 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 24, 2006 

Clerk
Order entered February 4 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 14 - 01331 - CR No. 05 - 14 - 01332 - CR THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant V. ERIC MONTRELL HICKMO N, Appellee On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 6 Dallas C ounty, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . M11 - 42220 - G, M11 - 42221 - G 

### O RDER Before Justices Francis, Evans, and Stoddart Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to issue the mandates in these appeals INSTANTER

. /s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 33

Making majority party appointments to Senate committees for the One

Hundred Fourth Congress.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 6 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1995

Mr. DOLE submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Making majority party appointments to Senate committees

for the One Hundred Fourth Congress.

1 Resolved, That the following shall constitute the ma2 jority party’s membership on those Senate committees list3 ed below for the One Hundred Fourth Congress, or until

4 their successors are appointed:

5 BUDGET: Mr. Domenici, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Nickles,

6 Mr. Gramm, Mr. Bond, Mr. Lott, Mr. Brown, Mr. Gorton,

7 Mr. Gregg, Ms. Snowe, Mr. Abraham, and Mr. Frist.

8 RULES AND ADMINISTRATION: Mr. Stevens, Mr. Hat9 field, Mr. Helms, Mr. Warner, Mr. Dole, Mr. McConnell,

10 Mr. Cochran, Mr. Santorum, and Mr. Nickles.
2

SRES 33 ATS

1 VETERANS’ AFFAIRS: Mr. Simpson, Mr. Murkowski,

2 Mr. Specter, Mr. Thurmond, Mr. Jeffords, Mr. Craig, and

3 Mr. Brown.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<CIK> 0000815555
<NAME> NATIONAL INSURANCE GROUP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            14,842
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       2,196
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  31,501
<CASH>                                           3,255
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           2,403
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,045
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                  2,450
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                              5,223
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  1,083
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,592
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,763
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,045
<PREMIUMS>                                       4,177
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                454
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   6,283
<BENEFITS>                                       1,213
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      1,784
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             6,738
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,179
<INCOME-TAX>                                       377
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                802
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       802
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                   2,198
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                              1,248
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                 (34)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                 179
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                   783
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                  2,450
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                           (34)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 133 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J. Res.133

                       One Hundred Fifth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  eight

                            Joint Resolution

 
 Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1999, and 
                           for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That section 106(c) of Public 
Law 105-240 is amended by striking ``October 9, 1998'' and inserting in 
lieu thereof ``October 12, 1998''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
U.S. Department ofTransportation, Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140 1200 NewJerseyAvenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590 

## Application toAmend Section 333 Exemption No. 11306 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-1023

March 18, 2016

Petitioner: HawkAerial, LLC Kevin J. Gould, CEO 1212 Victoria Drive Saint Helena, CA 94574 Cell: 425-218-3723 Email: kevin.gould@hawkaerial.com Website: www.hawkaerial.com

Greetings,

By letterfrom the FAA dated April 8, 2015, an exemption was granted to HawkAerial for relief under Section 333. That letterwas marked Section 333 Exemption No. 11306 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-1023. By FAA letter dated June 3, 2015, the above exemption was amended to include the DJI Phantom 3 models

. By FAA letter dated October 23, 2015, the above exemption was amended to includethe DJI Inspire, G4Skycrane and Prenav 1.0 models. By FAA letterdated February 18, 2016, the above exemption was amended to includethe DJI Matrice, Autonomous Avionics SkyTractorand Airborne Robotics AIR6 models.

HawkAerial hereby requests thatthe exemption so granted and amended, be now further amended to include all UAS makes and models that have previously been approved by the Secretary ofTransportation under Section 333 ofthe FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012. UAS that have been previously approved by the Secretary are found on the List ofApproved Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) under Section 333. The list, which is updated monthly, is posted at www.regulations.gov under docket number FAA-2007-3330. HawkAerial requests that it be authorized to operate any UAS on that list, when weighing less than 55 pounds including payload while this exemption is valid.

HawkAerial offers and incorporates by reference all ofthe data and analyses included in prior grants ofexemption forthe makes and models found on the List ofApproved Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) under Section 333, such as Exemption No. 15395, granted to UAV Solutions Inc. on March 15, 2016, under regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-5472.

The findings, rationale, conclusions and conditions contained in HawkAerial's FAA's Exemption No. 11306, as amended, apply

### to this application to include in Exemption No. 11306 all UAS makes and models that have previously been approved by the Secretary ofTransportation under Section 333 ofthe FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012.

Thankyou for your consideration ofthis important request. Please advise us ofany additional information that is required.

# Si~~**~r/pw J** 

Kevin J. Gould Airman Certificate #2830326 CEO, HawkAerial LLC

cc: ATTN: The Office ofRulemaking FAA Headquarters, Building lOA 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20951