alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8263 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8263

  To ensure opportunities for Department of Defense participation in 
    wildlife conservation banking programs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 15, 2020

  Mr. Wittman (for himself and Ms. Haaland) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To ensure opportunities for Department of Defense participation in 
    wildlife conservation banking programs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OBJECTIVES, PERFORMANCE STANDARDS, AND CRITERIA FOR USE OF 
              WILDLIFE CONSERVATION BANKING PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--To ensure opportunities for Department of Defense 
participation in wildlife conservation banking programs pursuant to 
section 2694c of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the 
Interior, acting through the Director of the United States Fish and 
Wildlife Service, shall issue regulations of general applicability 
establishing objectives, measurable performance standards, and criteria 
for use, consistent with the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et 
seq.), for mitigation banking offsetting effects on a species, or 
habitat of such species, that is endangered, threatened, a candidate 
for listing, or otherwise at risk under such Act. To the maximum extent 
practicable, the regulatory standards and criteria shall maximize 
available credits and opportunities for mitigation, provide flexibility 
for characteristics of various species, and apply equivalent standards 
and criteria to all mitigation banks.
    (b) Deadline for Regulations.--The Secretary of the Interior, 
acting through the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife 
Service, shall publish an advance notice of proposed rulemaking for the 
regulations required by subsection (a) by not later than one year after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Mary Ann DUREAU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mark Howard ALLENBAUGH, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-55715

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted December 8, 2017 Pasadena, California

Filed January 4, 2018

■ Joseph Curtis Edmondson, Attorney, Law Office of J. Curtis Edmondson, Hills-boro, OR, Michael Owen Stevens, Stevens & Legal, Hillsboro, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellant

Before: KELLY,* CALLAHAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges

*

 The Honorable Paul J. Kelly, Jr., United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Mary Dureau appeals the district court’s denial of her motion for a default judgment *444on a professional negligence claim against her former attorney Mark Howard Allen-•baugh. We review the denial of a motion for a default judgment for abuse of discretion and may affirm on any ground finding support in the record. *Eitel v. McCool,*782 F.2d 1470, 1471 (9th Cir. 1986).

To state a claim for attorney negligence in California, a plaintiff must plead the existence of proximate causation: *i.e.,*that but-for the attorney’s negligence, the plaintiff would have prevailed in a given action. *Viner v. Sweet,*30 Cal. 4th 1232, 1241, 135 Cal.Rptr.2d 629, 70 P.3d 1046 (2003). In her complaint, Dureau’s allegations of proximate causation were wholly conclusory. Dureau therefore failed to state a claim on which relief could be granted, *Ashcroft v. Iqbal,*556 U.S. 662, 678, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009), necessitating the denial of her motion for a default judgment, *DirecTV, Inc. v. Huynh,*503 F.3d 847, 854 (9th Cir. 2007); *Chudasama*v. *Mazda Motor Corp.,*123 F.3d 1353, 1370 n.41 (11th Cir. 1997). The district court also did riot abuse its discretion when it determined that Du-reau’s substantive claims lack merit. *Eitel v. McCool,*782 F.2d at 1471-72.

Dureau failed on appeal to develop her argument seeking a jury trial and has therefore waived it. *Indep. Towers of Washington v. Washington,*350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3,
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 321 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 321

 Expressing the sense of the Congress that money saved from efforts to 
   combat waste, fraud, and abuse in the Medicare Program should be 
 deposited in the Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund to ensure the 
              financial integrity of the Medicare Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 5, 1998

Mr. Snowbarger (for himself, Mr. Talent, Mr. Hostettler, Mr. Burton of 
Indiana, and Mr. Tiahrt) submitted the following concurrent resolution; 
which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition 
     to the Committee on Commerce, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Congress that money saved from efforts to 
   combat waste, fraud, and abuse in the Medicare Program should be 
 deposited in the Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund to ensure the 
              financial integrity of the Medicare Program.

Whereas it is estimated that, in fiscal year 1996, waste, fraud, and abuse in 
        the Medicare Program cost the program more than $23,000,000,000;
Whereas this money would otherwise be used to reimburse costs for health care 
        services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries;
Whereas the Congress has passed several Acts to combat waste, fraud, and abuse 
        in the Medicare Program;
Whereas proposals have been made to use any savings from efforts to combat 
        waste, fraud, and abuse in the Medicare Program not to preserve the 
        financial integrity of the program, but rather to expand eligibility for 
        health care services under the program to individuals between the ages 
        of 55 and 64;
Whereas expanding eligibility under the program before guaranteeing the 
        financial integrity of the program is irresponsible and breaks faith 
        with the millions of older Americans who rely on the Medicare Program; 
        and
Whereas in order to save money the Health Care Financing Administration has 
        limited certain medically necessary benefits for Medicare beneficiaries 
        who meet current eligibility requirements under the program: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that any money recovered from 
efforts to combat waste, fraud, and abuse in the Medicare Program 
should be deposited into the Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund to 
ensure the financial integrity of the Medicare Program and to secure 
health care services for only those individuals who meet current 
eligibility requirements under the program.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
Exhibit 31.2

       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 15d-14(a) (17 CFR 240.15d-14(a)) AND
                 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert Mayer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of ChrisKen Partners Cash Income
Fund L.P., a Delaware limited partnership;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(c) and 15d-15(e)), for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; and

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report are conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation, and;

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information, and;

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 12, 2005


/s/ Robert Mayer
---------------------------------------
Robert Mayer
Acting Principal Accounting Officer
ChrisKen Income Properties, Inc.,
   Managing General Partner
ChrisKen Partners Cash Income Fund L.P.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                  SUBSIDIARIES OF CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION

Corporations

Chesapeake Delta Corp.
Chesapeake Energy Louisiana Corporation
Chesapeake Energy Marketing, Inc.
Chesapeake EP Corporation
Chesapeake Operating, Inc.
Nomac Drilling Corporation

Limited Liability Companies

The Ames Company, L.L.C.
Carmen Acquisition, L.L.C.
Chesapeake Acquisition, L.L.C.
Chesapeake ENO Acquisition, L.L.C.
Chesapeake Focus, L.L.C.
Chesapeake KNAN Acquisition, L.L.C.
Chesapeake Mountain Front, L.L.C.
Chesapeake ORC, L.L.C.
Chesapeake Royalty, L.L.C.
Gothic Energy, L.L.C.
Gothic Production, L.L.C.
Sap Acquisition, L.L.C.

Partnerships

Chesapeake Exploration Limited Partnership
Chesapeake Louisiana, L.P.
Chesapeake Panhandle Limited Partnership
Chesapeake Sigma, L.P.
Chesapeake-Staghorn Acquisition L.P.
No. 11-994.

#### Missouri Association of Club Executives et al. *v.*Koster, Attorney General of Missouri.

Sup. Ct. Mo. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-1504.

#### Koch, aka Butrick *v.*City of Del City, Oklahoma, et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Audry LANE, also known as Spud, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-10370 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed 02/07/2018

Brian W. Portugal, Assistant U.S. Attorney, James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

James- Warren St. John, Esq., Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before BENAVIDES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM *

Audry Lane has appealed the sentence imposed related to his conviction of conspiracy to commit sex trafficking. He asserts that the district court erred in adjusting his Sentencing Guidelines offense level by two levels under U.S.S.G. § 3Bl.l(c) because he was an organizer or leader of criminal activity. Lane argues that he “was involved in the organization and even helped formulate the idea of the sex trade, but very soon backed off while his brother and others ran the operation.”

Lane has not shown that the district court’s finding, based on the unrebutted findings in the presentence report, is clearly erroneous. *See United States v. Ochoa-Gomez,*777 F.3d 278, 281 (5th Cir. 2015); *see also United States v. Guzman-Reyes,*853 F.3d 260, 265-66 (5th Cir. 2017). The judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir, R, 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R, 47.5.4,
#### Jay D. LAMONT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-1571

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: February 22, 2018

Filed: February 27, 2018

Jay D. Lamont, Pro Se

Danielle L. Sgro, Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee

Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Jay D. Lamont appeals the adverse grant of summary judgment entered by the district court1 in his Federal Tort Claims Act action. Upon de novo review of the record, *see Beaulieu v. Ludeman,*690 F.3d 1017, 1024 (8th Cir. 2012), and consideration of Lamont’s arguments for reversal, we find no basis for overturning the grant of summary judgment. The judgment of the district court is affirmed. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Beth Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Housing Finance Agency

          - 12 CFR Parts 1209, 1217, and 1250
          - RIN 2590-AB20

# AGENCY:

Federal Housing Finance Agency.

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) is correcting a final rule that was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on January 12, 2022, amending its Rules of Practice and Procedure and other agency regulations to adjust each civil money penalty within its jurisdiction to account for inflation, pursuant to the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990, as amended by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015. In that publication, the Regulatory Identification Number (RIN) for the FHFA was incorrect. This document corrects that error.                    

# DATES:

 Effective April 6, 2022, and applicable beginning January 15, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Frank R. Wright, Assistant General Counsel, at (202) 649-3087,                         *Frank.Wright@fhfa.gov*                         (not a toll-free number); Federal Housing Finance Agency, 400 7th Street SW, Washington, DC 20219. For TTY/TRS users with hearing and speech disabilities, dial 711 and ask to be connected to any of the contact numbers above.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In FR Doc. 2022-00361, “Rules of Practice and Procedure; Civil Money Penalty Inflation Adjustment” that published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on Wednesday, January 12, 2022 at 87 FR 1659, in the first column on page 1659, correct the RIN to read 2590-AB20.                

Sandra L. Thompson,

Acting Director, Federal Housing Finance Agency.

[FR Doc. 2022-07176 Filed 4-5-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8070-01-P