alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.13.3



 Exhibit 10.13.3 

PAYBACK AGREEMENT 
 PAYBACK AGREEMENT
dated 10/10/2013 between StoneMor GP LLC (“StoneMor”), general partner of StoneMor Partners, L.P., and David Meyers (“Employee”). 

WHEREAS, in connection with Employee’s acceptance of a new position with StoneMor, StoneMor has offered to reimburse Employee for certain relocation
expenses in accordance with applicable relocation policy; and 
 WHEREAS, in consideration for such reimbursement, StoneMor wishes to establish, and
Employee agrees to accept, certain conditions under which Employee must repay all such expenses assumed by StoneMor on Employee’s behalf. 
 NOW,
THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby, StoneMor and Employee agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	In the event that Employee separates from employment with StoneMor, or with any successor employer which continues StoneMor’s employment of Employee without interruption by operation of law or contract
(“Successor Employer”), within twelve (12) months from the effective relocation date in Employee’s new location for any reason except an employer-initiated termination due to reorganization or lack of work (a
“Separation”), Employee agrees to reimburse StoneMor, or the Successor Employer, for all expenses incurred or paid by StoneMor on Employee’s behalf in connection with Employee’s relocation (“Relocation Expenses”). Such
Relocation Expenses shall include, without limitation, all moving and transportation expenses, home sale and purchase assistance payments, mortgage subsidies and/or corporate second mortgages, travel and lodging, insurance charges, and tax gross-up
payments incurred or paid by StoneMor. 

  

	 	2.	In the event of a separation of employment for any reason other than a “Separation” as defined in the preceding paragraph, StoneMor, or the Successor Employer, shall provide Employee with an itemized list of
Relocation Expenses incurred or paid to date. All Relocation Expenses shall be due and payable by Employee within thirty (30) days after Employee’s date of Separation or date of the itemized list of Relocation Expenses, whichever is later
(“Due Date”). Any outstanding balance which remains unpaid by Employee after the Due Date shall be subject to late charges calculated at 1% per month until such balance is paid in full. 


 

	 	3.	In addition, and without limiting any of the foregoing rights, Employee hereby authorizes StoneMor, or the Successor Employer, to the full extent permitted by law, to deduct Relocation Expenses and any accrued late
charges from Employee’s final paycheck, bonus check or any other wages or payments otherwise due to Employee.     

  

	 	4.	StoneMor may assign its rights under this Agreement to any Successor Employer. 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement effective on the date first above written. 

 

									
	STONEMOR GP LLC	 	 	 	EMPLOYEE
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Penelope Casey
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ David Meyers

	Name:	 	 Penelope Casey
	 		 	Name:	 	 David Meyers

	Title:	 	 VP, Human Resources
	 		 	Title:	 	 COO
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
  We consent to the use in this Registration Statement of Edge Petroleum
Corporation, a Delaware corporation, on Form S-4 of our reports dated December
2, 1996, relating to the combined financial statements of Edge Petroleum
Corporation, a Texas corporation, affiliated entities and direct interests,
the consolidated financial statements of Edge Petroleum Corporation, a Texas
corporation, and subsidiary, the financial statements of Edge Group II and
Gulfedge and the balance sheet of Edge Petroleum Corporation, a Delaware
corporation, appearing in the Joint Proxy and Consent Solicitation
Statement/Prospectus, which is part of this Registration Statement.
 
  We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such
Joint Proxy and Consent Solicitation Statement/Prospectus.
 
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Houston, Texas
 
December 3, 1996
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0000201 31-JUL-2015 11:05 AM
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in each Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-32565, 33-
43788, 33-48610 and 33-53802 of Plains Resources Inc. of our report dated
February 22, 1996, appearing on page F2 of this Form 10-K.


/s/ PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
Houston, Texas
February 29, 1996
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

February 8, 2013

d0205

Order 

February 8, 2013

145257 & (5)(6)

In re:

The Honorable Bruce U. Morrow SC: 145257

Judge, 3rd Circuit Court

Detroit, Michigan 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The 

motion to seal the record is considered, and it is DENIED as moot. In the absence of a 

stipulation waiving confidentiality, MCR 9.221 applies.
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.2
 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of the Company;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the Company and we have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the
audit committee of Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial
reporting.
  By:
    /s/ Simon DewhurstName:
    Simon DewhurstTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 64 (Monday, April 4, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19514-19515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07057]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for

[[Page 19515]]

immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than May 4, 2022.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (William Spaniel, Senior 
Vice President) 100 North 6th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105-
1521. Comments can also be sent electronically to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#480b2725252d263c3b6629383824212b293c2127263b0838202124662e3a2a66273a2f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aeedc1c3c3cbc0dadd80cfdedec2c7cdcfdac7c1c0ddeedec6c7c280c8dccc80c1dcc9">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Fulton Financial Corporation, Lancaster, Pennsylvania; to merge 
with Prudential Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire 
Prudential Bank, both of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 30, 
2022.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-07057 Filed 4-1-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 73 Referred in Senate (RFS)]







105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 73


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 14, 1997

      Received and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION


 
                 Concerning the death of Chaim Herzog.

Whereas Chaim Herzog, the sixth President of the State of Israel, passed away on 
        Thursday, April 17, 1997;
Whereas Chaim Herzog, in his very life exemplified the struggles and triumphs of 
        the State of Israel;
Whereas Chaim Herzog had a brilliant military, business, legal, political, and 
        diplomatic career;
Whereas Chaim Herzog represented Israel at the United Nations from 1975-1978 and 
        with great eloquence defended Israel and its values against the forces 
        of darkness and dictatorship;
Whereas Chaim Herzog, as President of Israel from 1983-1993, set a standard for 
        honor and rectitude; and
Whereas Chaim Herzog was a great friend of the United States of America and as 
        President of Israel had the honor of addressing a joint meeting of the 
        United States Congress on November 10, 1987: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That--
            (1) the Congress of the United States notes with great 
        sadness the passing of Chaim Herzog, a great leader of Israel 
        and a great friend of America and the Congress sends its 
        deepest condolences to the entire Herzog family and to the 
        Government and people of Israel; and
            (2) a copy of this resolution shall be transmitted to the 
        Speaker of the Knesset in Jerusalem, to President Ezer Weizman 
        of Israel, and to Mrs. Aura Herzog of Herzlia, Israel.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 13, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.`
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

09/25

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 Sep 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.11 N 77.11 W Meters AGL
CERTIFICATION                                                       Exhibit 31.1
Chief Executive Officer
I, Robert Moore, President and Chief Executive Officer certify that:

     1.  I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB of  Chadmoore
         Wireless Group, Inc;

     2.  Based on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement
         of a material fact or omit to state a material  fact  necessary to make
         the  statements  made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such
         statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
         by the report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other financial
         information  included in the  report,  fairly  present in all  material
         respects the financial  conditions,  the results of its  operations and
         cash flows of the issuer as of, and for,  the periods  presented in the
         report;

     4.  The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are
         responsible for  establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
         procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
         registrant and have:

         a.   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures to ensure that
              material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its
              consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to them by others within
              those  entities,  particularly  during  the  period  in which  the
              periodic reports are being prepared;

         b.   Evaluated  the   effectiveness  of  the  registrant's   disclosure
              controls and  procedures  as of a date within 90 days prior to the
              filing date of the report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c.   Presented in the report their  conclusions about the effectiveness
              of  the  disclosure   controls  and  procedures   based  on  their
              evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     5.  The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officers  and I have
         disclosed,  based on our most recent evaluation,  to the small business
         issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the board or directors (or
         persons fulfilling the equivalent function):

         a.   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
              or operation of internal  controls or  financial  reporting  which
              could adversely  affect the issuer's  ability to record,  process,
              summarize and report financial data; and

         b.   Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or
              other employees who have a significant  role in the small business
              issuer's internal controls or financial reporting; and


August 12, 2004

/s/ ROBERT W. MOORE
------------------------
Robert W. Moore
Chief Executive Officer
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 8
 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 8
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 8
 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 8
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                     BD

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                      APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                             10,553,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                       2,251,000
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                         0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                                 2,650,000
<PP&E>                                              2,088,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     28,280,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                                0
<PAYABLES>                                                  0
<REPOS-SOLD>                                                0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                         0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                    506,000
<LONG-TERM>                                           408,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                           114,000
<COMMON>                                                1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                         21,839,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       28,280,000
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                     395,000
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                                1,334,000
<COMMISSIONS>                                      42,086,000
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                       3,973,000
<FEE-REVENUE>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     49,000
<COMPENSATION>                                     37,323,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (9,171,000)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (7,383,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.90)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (0.90)


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. ELVINO ALBERTO CAGNARDI, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 869 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 20th day of May, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    Mar-31-1999
<CASH>                           3,901
<SECURITIES>                       737
<RECEIVABLES>                      690
<ALLOWANCES>                         0
<INVENTORY>                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     0
<PP&E>                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  24,796
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                0
<BONDS>                            714
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<COMMON>                           355
<OTHER-SE>                      22,444
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    24,796
<SALES>                            739
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 1,278
<CGS>                              185
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      185
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   505
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  12
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    576
<INCOME-TAX>                      (656)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              1,232
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                     1,232
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                      .31
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 318 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 318

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Federal Trade Commission 
should exercise its broad authority under the Federal Trade Commission 
   Act to investigate businesses that are engaging in the deceptive 
 advertising practice of misrepresenting their geographic locations in 
  telephone listings, Internet advertisements, and other advertising 
                                 media.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 5, 1998

 Mr. Calvert submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                 referred to the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Federal Trade Commission 
should exercise its broad authority under the Federal Trade Commission 
   Act to investigate businesses that are engaging in the deceptive 
 advertising practice of misrepresenting their geographic locations in 
  telephone listings, Internet advertisements, and other advertising 
                                 media.

Whereas geographic distinctions regarding businesses are becoming less apparent 
        because technological advances are creating a more universal economy;
Whereas the proliferation and growth of the family-owned, local, small business 
        is an economically desirable activity;
Whereas the people of the United States, through their Government, have an 
        interest in encouraging technological innovation, but have a competing 
        and equally compelling interest in protecting consumers and competitors 
        from unfair and deceptive trade practices;
Whereas consumers sometimes make conscious decisions to patronize local and 
        neighborhood small businesses and take actions intended to carry out 
        these decisions;
Whereas technological innovations in marketing products can inadvertently cause 
        or intentionally be used to create confusion for consumers making 
        purchasing decisions; and
Whereas consumers have the right to the information they need to make informed 
        purchasing decisions: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that the Federal Trade Commission 
should exercise its broad authority under the Federal Trade Commission 
Act to investigate businesses that are engaging in the deceptive 
advertising practice of misrepresenting their geographic locations in 
telephone listings, Internet advertisements, and other advertising 
media.
                                 <all>
```