alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.2**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Quarterly Report”) of
      Emerald Dairy Inc. (the “Registrant”) for the fiscal quarter ended March 31,
      2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
      I, Shu Kaneko, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Registrant, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Registrant.








By: /s/
Shu
      Kaneko


Shu
      Kaneko


Chief
      Financial Officer and Secretary


(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)


Dated
      this 20 th day of
      May, 2008
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
  As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 relating to the stock
incentive plans of The Wiser Oil Company (Nos. 33-44171, 33-62441, 33-44172,
333-22525 and 333-15083) of our report dated February 18, 1997 appearing on
page F-2 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
                                          /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
                                          Arthur Andersen LLP
 
Dallas, Texas,
February 18, 1997
Exhibit 10.6 


Base Salaries for Named Executive Officers


 


As of January 1, 2014 the following are the base salaries (on
an annual basis) of the named executive officers (as defined in Item 402(a)(3) of Regulation S-K) of Access National Corporation:


 


	Michael W. Clarke	 	$	370,000	 
	President and Chief Executive Officer	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Dean Hackemer	 	$	350,000	 
	President, Mortgage Division	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Robert C. Shoemaker	 	$	296,800	 
	Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Margaret M. Taylor	 	$	275,000	 
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### COM. v. STRANGE, J.

2770 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/11/2017

CP-51-CR-0001639-2016 (Philadelphia)

Affirmed
#### Edwin LOPEZ-MENDEZ, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 16-70642

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted January 16, 2018 *

Filed January 19, 2018

*477Fermín Valencia, I, Esquire, Attorney, Valencia & Associates APC, Santa Ana, CA, for Petitioner

Jennifer A. Bowen, Trial Attorney, Anthony Cardozo Payne, Senior Litigation Counsel, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: REINHARDT, TROTT, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *477*See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Edwin Lopez-Mendez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s continuous physical presence determination, *Gutierrez v. Mukasey,*521 F.3d 1114, 1116 (9th Cir. 2008), and review de novo questions of law, *Mohammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Lopez-Mendez failed to establish the requisite ten years of continuous physical presence for cancellation of removal, where the record contains a signed Form 1-826 and he has not shown that his acceptance of administrative voluntary departure in lieu of removal proceedings was not knowing and voluntary. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(A); *Gutierrez,*521 F.3d at 1117-18 (requiring some evidence that the alien was informed of and accepted the terms of the voluntary departure agreement). Lopez-Mendez’s testimony does not compel a contrary conclusion, where he was given an opportunity to read the Form 1-826 before signing it and where he has not shown that the representations of immigration officials were inaccurate or misleading. *Cf. Ibarra-Flores v. Gonzales,*439 F.3d 614, 619-20 (9th Cir. 2006) (insufficient evidence that alien knowingly and voluntarily accepted voluntary departure where record did not contain the voluntary departure form and alien’s testimony suggested that he accepted return due to misrepresentations by immigration authorities).

Lopez-Mendez’s related due process claim fails for lack of prejudice. *See id.*at 620-21.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid*478ed by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<PAGE>

================================================================================

                                 UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                        SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


      Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)   November 6, 2001
                                                        (November 6, 2001)


                               GLOBAL MARINE INC.
               (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)



              Delaware                     1-5471             95-1849298
   (State or other jurisdiction of      (Commission        (I.R.S. Employer
    incorporation or organization)      file number)     Identification No.)


  777 N. Eldridge Parkway,  Houston, Texas                  77079-4493
  (Address of principal executive offices)                  (Zip Code)


       Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (281) 596-5100

================================================================================
<PAGE>

ITEM 7.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS

(c) Exhibits

          99.1     Global Marine Fleet Status as of November 6, 2001.

ITEM 9.  REGULATION FD DISCLOSURE

Once during the first half of each calendar month and until further notice,
Global Marine Inc. publishes a list containing information about the status of
each rig in its offshore drilling rig fleet. The list includes each rig's rated
water depth, design, location, and contract status, including information
regarding the dayrate being earned by the rig.  Information in the list for
November 2001 is as of November 6, 2001.  The list is included as Exhibit 99.1
to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated herein by reference.

The information furnished pursuant to this Item 9, including Exhibit 99.1, shall
not be deemed to be "filed" for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section.


                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


                                 GLOBAL MARINE INC.



Date: November 6, 2001           By: /s/ Michael R. Dawson
                                    -------------------------------
                                    Michael R. Dawson
                                    Vice President, Investor Relations
                                    and Corporate Communications
<PAGE>

                               INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit
Number          Description
------          -----------

  99.1         Global Marine Fleet Status as of November 6, 2001.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Foreign Assets Control

# AGENCY:

Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons whose property and interests in property have been unblocked and have been removed from OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List).

# DATES:

                        See                         **Supplementary Information**                         section for effective date(s).                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

OFAC: Andrea Gacki, Director, tel.: 202-622-2490; Associate Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202-622-2420; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480; Assistant Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202-622-4855; or the Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 202-622-2490.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Electronic Availability

                    The Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are available on OFAC's website (                    *https://www.treasury.gov/​ofac*).                

## Notice of OFAC Actions

On March 18, 2022, OFAC determined that the property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following person are unblocked and he has been removed from the SDN List under the relevant sanctions authorities listed below.

## Individual

1. ROSENTHAL HIDALGO, Yani Benjamin, 5 Calle, 24 Avenida S.O. #226, San Pedro Sula, Honduras; DOB 14 Jul 1965; POB Honduras; Passport B255530 (Honduras); National ID No. 0501196506001 (Honduras); RTN 05011965060013 (Honduras) (individual) [SDNTK].

Dated: March 18, 2022.

Gregory T. Gatjanis,

Associate Director, Office of Global Targeting, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the Treasury.

[FR Doc. 2022-06978 Filed 4-1-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P
1 The Honorable Stephen M. Reasoner, United States District Judge for the

EasternDistrict of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Henry L. Jones, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-3382

___________ Kenneth Fletcher, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas * Eastern District of Arkansas. Department of Correction, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: January 5, 2001 Filed: January 22, 2001

___________ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, HANSEN, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. KennethFletcher appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal with prejudice of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ submissions on appeal, we conclude that his second prosecution did not violate double jeopardy, collateral estoppel, or res judicata principles. We affirm for the reasons-2-

stated in the magistrate judge’s thorough and well-reasoned report, adopted in its entirety by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7336

EARL SAND, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus S. STEELE, Corrections Officer; L. RICKS, Corrections Officer, 6-2 Shift; DARLING, Corrections Officer; B. MOHEAD, Inmate Hearings Officer A, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States Dist rict Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-01-11-2) Submitted: June 19, 2003 Decided: August 8, 2003 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Earl Sand, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sa rgent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Earl Sand appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeSand v. Steele , No. CA01-11-2 (E.D. Va. Aug. 15, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 10 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 10

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
    authorizing the Congress and the States to prohibit the act of 
   desecration of the flag of the United States and to set criminal 
                        penalties for that act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 1997

   Mrs. Emerson introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
    authorizing the Congress and the States to prohibit the act of 
   desecration of the flag of the United States and to set criminal 
                        penalties for that act.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``The Congress and the States shall have power to prohibit the act 
of desecration of the flag of the United States and to set criminal 
penalties for that act.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-1310.

#### Continental Insurance Co. *v.*Thorpe Insulation Co. et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer
                         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2002 of Citizens Holding Company (the "Company"), as filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I,
Robert T. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (3)  the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (4)  the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

                                            /s/ Robert T. Smith
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Robert T. Smith
                                            Chief Financial Officer
Order entered September 5, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00999-CV

LOUIS MARTIN, JR., Appellant

V.

U.S. MERCHANTS FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 10-15757

ORDER

The Court has before it the request of Vielica Dobbins, Official Court Reporter of the 

134th Judicial District Court, for an extension of time in which to file the reporter’s record. The 

Court GRANTS the request and ORDERS that the reporter’s record be filed by September 30, 

2013.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bay Resources Ltd (the
Company) for the three months ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), the
undersigned, Peter Lee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| |                                                                                                                             
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | a)     The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



| |                                                                                                                                                           
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | b)     The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Date: May 20, 2003

/s/ Peter LeeName: Peter LeeTitle:   Director, Secretary andChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
No. 11-10630.

No. 11-10768.

#### Duronio *v.*United States. Duronio *v.*Werlinger, Warden.

C. A. 3d Cir.; and

C. A. 3d Cir. Motions of petitioner for leave to proceed *informa pauperis*denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 22,2012, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Julio Cesar CORONADO, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-10361 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 20, 2018

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Julio Cesar Coronado, Pro Se

Before REAVLEY, CLEMENT, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Julio Cesar Coronado has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Coronado has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and .the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,’ counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          15,065
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  190,179
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          82,641
<DEPRECIATION>                                (32,056)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 290,835
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        209,761
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        60,991
<OTHER-SE>                                    (12,624)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   290,835
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,852
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,684
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,674
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,651
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,467
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,184
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,184
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25
        

</TABLE>