2017 OK 96

#### STATE of Oklahoma EX REL. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant, v. Margarita SOLIS, Respondent.

Case Number: SCBD-6580

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Decided: 12/05/2017

ORDER APPROVING RESIGNATION

On November 3, 20Í7, the Oklahoma Bar Association (Bar Association), notified the Court that the respondent, Margarita Solis (Attomey/respondent), had resigned from the Oklahoma Bar Association pending disciplinary proceedings. The disciplinary proceedings relate to: failing to properly sa-fekeep client funds; failing to adequately communicate and diligently represent the client.

THE COURT FINDS:

> 1. The respondent has voluntarily resigned from the Oklahoma Bar Association by complying with Rule 8.1 and Rule 8.2, Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 5 O.S. 2011 Ch.l, -App. 1-A. The respondent’s affidavit of resignation reflects.that: a) it was freely and voluntarily rendered; b) she was not subject to coercion or duress; and e) she was fully aware of the consequences of - submitting this resignation.

> 2. The respondent states that she is aware of the following grievances against her:

> DC 16-189: Grievance by Douglas Ea-son: it alleged that the respondent while employed as the Director of Immigration Legal Services for Catholic Charities, converted filing fees paid by clients to her personal use. The amount of converted funds exceeds $24,000.00;

> DC 17-64: Grievance by Juan Calamaco: it alleged that the respondent failed to safekeep client retainer funds and converted $850.00 for personal use and that she- failed to adequately communicate and diligently represent Calmaco;

> DC 17-149: Grievance by Luis Torres Ayala: it alleged that the respondent failed to safekeep client funds converted $3700.00 for personal use and that she failed to adequately communicate and diligently represent Ayala.

> 3. The respondent states in her affidavit of resignation that she is aware that the allegations of conduct, if proven, would be a violation of Rules 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1,15, 8.4(a), and 8.4(c) of the Oklahoma Rules of Professional Conduct, 5 O.S, 2011, Ch. 1, App. 3-A, and Rules 1.3 and 6,2 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 5 O.S. 2011 Ch. 1, App. 1-A and of her oath as an attorney.

> 4. The respondent’s resignation pending disciplinary proceedings is in compliance with all of the requirements set forth in Rule 8.1, Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 6 O.S. 2011 Ch. 1, App. 1-A and it should be approved. The' Bar Association has incurred costs of $52.96 in this proceeding.

> 5. The official roster address of the respondent as shown by the Oklahoma Bar Association is: Margarita Solis, 4123 W. Main St., Apt. H, Norman, OK 73072. ■

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Margarita Solis’ resignation pending discipline be approved.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED; AND DECREED that Margarita Solis’ name be stricken from the roll of attorneys. Because resignation pending disciplinary proceedings is tantamount to disbarment, the respondent may not make an application for reinstatement prior to the expiration of 6 years from the date of this order. Pursuant to Rule 9.1, Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 6 O.S. 2011, Ch. 1, App. 1-A, the respondent shall notify all of her clients, if any, haying legal business pending with her within 20 days, by certified mail, of her inability to represent them and of the necessity for promptly retaining new counsel. The respondent shall pay the Bar Association $52.96 for the costs of this proceeding.

*586DONE BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT THIS 4th DAY OF DECEMBER 2017.

ALL JUSTICES CONCUR