alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6422

JOHN F. GASTON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-05-83-2) Submitted: June 30, 2005 Decided: July 27, 2005 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John F. Gaston, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: John F. Gaston seeks a certificate of appealability from the district court’s order denying relief on his petition for habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gaston has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Gaston’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### COM. v. BUTLER, A.

2225 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/06/2017

CP-51-CR-0001557-2015, CP-51-CR-0001558-2015 (Philadelphia)

Affirmed
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8276 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8276

To authorize the President to posthumously award the Medal of Honor to 
    Alwyn C. Cashe for acts of valor during Operation Iraqi Freedom.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 16, 2020

   Mrs. Murphy of Florida (for herself, Mr. Crenshaw, and Mr. Waltz) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the President to posthumously award the Medal of Honor to 
    Alwyn C. Cashe for acts of valor during Operation Iraqi Freedom.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD MEDAL OF HONOR TO SERGEANT FIRST 
              CLASS ALWYN C. CASHE FOR ACTS OF VALOR DURING OPERATION 
              IRAQI FREEDOM.

    (a) Waiver of Time Limitations.--Notwithstanding the time 
limitations specified in section 7274 of title 10, United States Code, 
or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain 
medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, the President may 
award the Medal of Honor under section 7271 of such title to Sergeant 
First Class Alwyn C. Cashe for the acts of valor described in 
subsection (b).
    (b) Acts of Valor Described.--The acts of valor referred to in 
subsection (a) are the actions of Sergeant First Class Alwyn C. Cashe 
on October 17, 2005, as a member of the Army serving in Iraq in support 
of Operation Iraqi Freedom, for which he was posthumously awarded the 
Silver Star.
                                 <all>
```
#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Shawn WILMER, Petitioner

No. 301 WAL 2017

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

January 4, 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND .NOW, this 4th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
**Exhibit 31.4**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Kirk T. Larsen, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Black Knight, Inc.; and

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

Date: April 26, 2018

 
| By:    | /s/ Kirk T. Larsen                                                        |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Kirk T. Larsen    Executive Vice President and    Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 62 (Thursday, March 31, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 18823]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06770]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting:

    Name and Committee Code: Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory 
Committee (#13883).
    Date and Time: June 6, 2022; 12:00 p.m.-4:00 p.m. (Eastern).
    Place: NSF, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314 
(Virtual).
    Attendance information for the meeting will be forthcoming on 
the website: https://www.nsf.gov/mps/ast/aaac.jsp.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Persons: Martin Still, National Science Foundation, 2415 
Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; Telephone: 703-292-4290.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations to the 
National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Aeronautics and 
Space Administration (NASA) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 
on issues within the field of astronomy and astrophysics that are of 
mutual interest and concern to the agencies.
    Agenda: To provide updates on Agency activities.

    Dated: March 28, 2022.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-06770 Filed 3-30-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
#### Cecil F. MOTLEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.; Host Hotels & Resorts of Virginia, L.P., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-1646

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 29, 2017

Decided: December 22, 2017

*140Wayne J. King,' Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellant. Walter E. Gillcrist, Jr., BU-DOW *&*NOBLE, P.C., Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Cecil F. Motley, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Host Hotels *&*Resorts, Inc., and Host Hotels *&*Resorts of Virginia, L.P., in his personal injury action. “[W]e review de novo the district court’s order granting summary judgment.” *Jacobs v. N.C. Admin. Office of the Courts,*780 F.3d 562, 565 n.1 (4th Cir. 2015). “A district court ‘shall grant summary judgment if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.’ ” *Id.*at 568 (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a)). “A dispute is genuine if a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.” *Id.*(internal quotation marks omitted). In determining whether a genuine issue of material fact exists, “we view the facts and all justifiable inferences arising therefrom in the light most favorable to ... the nonmoving party.” *Id.*at 565 n.1 (internal quotation marks omitted). However, “the nonmoving party must rely on more than eonclusory allegations, mere speculation, the building of one inference upon another, or the mere existence of a scintilla of evidence.” *Dash v. Mayweather,*731 F.3d 303, 311 (4th Cir. 2013).

We have thoroughly reviewed the parties’ briefs and the materials in the joint appendix and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Motley v. Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.,*No. 8:15-cv-02062-PX, 2017 WL 1406297 (D. Md. Apr. 20, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Golub Capital Investment Corporation and Subsidiaries (the “Registrant”) for the annual period ended September 30, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ross A. Teune, as Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:


|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

/s/ Ross A. TeuneName: Ross A. TeuneTitle:  Chief Financial Officer





Date: November 28, 2017
# Methane white papers letter

Good afternoon, Please see the attached letter from 65 groups suppo rting EPA’s work on its white papers and urging the agency to move forward with methane regulations for the oi l and gas industry. Best, Jessica

__________________________________ Jessica Ennis Senior Legislative Representative Earthjustice T: 202.745.5202 C: 202.295.7619 earthjustice.org facebook.com/earthjustice twitter.com/earthjustice
Because the earth needs a good lawyer 

### Ennis <jennis@earthjustice.org> Jessica Mon 6/16/2014 4:33 PM To: OilandGas.Whitepapers <OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.go v>; Cc: Moore, Bruce <Moore.Bruce@epa.gov>; Tsirigotis, Pet er <Tsirigotis.Peter@epa.gov>; Gunning, Paul <Gunning.Paul@epa.gov>; Dunham, Sarah <Dunham.Sarah @epa.gov>; Goffman, Joseph <Goffman.Joseph@epa.gov> ; 

###  1 attachment June 16 2014 Oil and Gas Methane White Paper Commen ts.pdf; 

### Page **1 of**  **1 Methane white papers letter**  **- OilandGas.Whitepapers** 

**8/ 26/** **2014 https://pod51045.outlook.com/owa/OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov/**
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4

                       Consent of Independent Accountants


         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Amendment
No. 5 to Registration Statement on Form S-4 of our report dated September 7,
2001 relating to the combined financial statements of the Gas Compression
Business of Schlumberger Limited, which appears in the Current Report on Form
8-K/A of Hanover Compressor Company dated November 9, 2001. We also consent to
the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Registration Statement.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas
February 7, 2003
DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY
2800 DEFENSE PENTAGON
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20301-2800

IST oF
MEMORANDUM FOR DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY WORKFORCE
SUBJECT: FY23 Reasonable Accommodations for Persons with Disabilities Policy Statement

The Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) is committed to ensuring all
qualified employees and applicants with disabilities are afforded the benefits and privileges of
employment equal to employees and applicants without disabilities. It is DSCA's policy to
provide reasonable accommodations in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act,
as amended, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and all other applicable Federal laws
and regulations.

A reasonable accommodation is a modification/adjustment to the work environment that
enables a qualified individual with a disability to perform the essential functions of a position.
Reasonable accommodations also include modifications/adjustments to a job application process
that enable a qualified applicant with a disability to be considered for a position, as well as
modifications or adjustments that enable a qualified employee with a disability to have equal
benefits and privileges of employment as employees without disabilities.

Employees may request a reasonable accommodation, orally or in writing, from their
immediate supervisor or DSCA's Talent Management (TM) Directorate. Applicants can request a
reasonable accommodation through the point of contact identified in the Job Opportunity
Announcement. Supervisors and employees must engage in the interactive process to ensure
timely processing of reasonable accommodation requests.

Employees, who believe they were unlawfully denied a reasonable accommodation, may
contact an Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Counselor within the Defense Logistics
Agency (DLA) EEO & Diversity Office! at HQEEOinquiries@dla.mil or 571-767-6777, to file a
discrimination complaint. Employees should contact a DLA EEO Counselor no later than 45
calendar days from the date of the alleged denial. For more information, please visit the DSCA
EEO website at https://www.dsca.mil/eco-equal-employment-opportunity.

DSCA is committed to providing reasonable accommodations to qualified employees and

applicants with disabilities, transforming disabilities into enabling abilities, and improving
DSCA’s productivity and employee cohesiveness.

a Rawk

James A. Hurseh
Director

'DLA provides EEO and human resource services to DSCA.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 00004

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

x 00004\00004_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00004\00004_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00004\00004_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00004\00004_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00004\00004_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

00004\Certification Statement_00004.pdf Plant certification statement

x 00004\Supplemental Documents\00004_WH Weatherspoon A5-2 Aerial Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00004\Supplemental Documents\00004_WH Weatherspoon A5-3 Water Balance Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00004\Supplemental Documents\00004_WH Weatherspoon D3-1 Pond-1 Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00004\ICR Follow Up Emails\ICR Follow Up questions.docx Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

x 00004\ICR Follow Up Emails\ICR follow up.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

x 00004\00004_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

00004\00004_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
H. R. 8354 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty 

An Act 

To establish the Servicemembers and Veterans Initiative within the Civil Rights 

Division of the Department of Justice, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Servicemembers and Veterans 

Initiative Act of 2020’’. 

SEC. 2. SERVICEMEMBERS AND VETERANS INITIATIVE. 

(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established the Servicemembers 

and Veterans Initiative within the Civil Rights Division of the 

Department of Justice. 

(b) DUTIES.—The Servicemembers and Veterans Initiative 

shall— 

(1) serve as legal and policy advisor to the Attorney General 

on the Department of Justice’s efforts to enforce criminal and 

civil laws that impact servicemembers, veterans, and their families; 

(2) develop policy recommendations for the Attorney General on how the Department of Justice may improve enforcement of Federal law to support servicemembers, veterans, and 

their families; 

(3) serve as the liaison and point of contact between the 

Department of Justice and the military departments; 

(4) provide counsel to the Assistant Attorney General for 

the Office of Justice Programs to ensure funding decisions 

take into account servicemembers, veterans, and their families; 

(5) consult with components of the Department of Justice 

to promote the provision of civil legal aid to servicemembers, 

veterans, and their families; 

(6) serve as a liaison and point of contact with the Consumer Protection Branch of the Civil Division of the Department of Justice, with respect to the prosecution of Federal 

crimes involving fraud that target servicemembers; and 

(7) serve as a liaison and point of contact with other components of the Department of Justice as needed to support the 
H. R. 8354—2 

enforcement of other Federal laws that protect servicemembers 

and veterans, as the Attorney General determines appropriate. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-95,058-01

EX PARTE LASHA EILEEN SPACEK, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. CR-19-1300-D-WHC IN THE 428TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HAYS COUNTY

KELLER, P.J., filed a dissenting opinion in which YEARY, KEEL and SLAUGHTER, JJ.,

joined.

DISSENTING OPINION

The trial court stacked Applicant’s sentences. She claims that her plea was involuntary

because she would have accepted the State’s plea offer if she had known her sentences could be

stacked. Trial counsel acknowledges that he told Applicant the sentences would run concurrently,

and he says she would have accepted the plea offer if he had correctly advised her. The Court grants

Applicant a new trial. 

But after Applicant filed this writ application, the trial court entered a nunc pro tunc order

ordering that the sentences run concurrently. It appears that Applicant has received the sentence she
SPACEK DISSENT - 2

thought she would receive, and her involuntary-plea claim now must fail. I would dismiss the

application as moot. 

I respectfully dissent. 

Delivered: October 18, 2023

Publish
**EXHIBIT ITEM 31.1**

 

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

 

I, Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr.certify that:

 

1.               I have read this quarterly report on Form10-QSB of Northern California Bancorp, Inc.;

 

2.       Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;

 

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4.       The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

 

a)                    designed such disclosure controls andprocedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;

 

b)                   evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period(the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

c)                    presented in this annual report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and proceduresbased on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.       The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee or registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

2.               all significant deficiencies in the design oroperation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and haveidentified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internalcontrols; and

 

3.               any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.       The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in thisannual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or inother factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent tothe date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions withregard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 
| Date: August  11, 2003 | /s/ Charles  T. Chrietzberg, Jr.                 |   |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                   | Charles T.  Chrietzberg, Jr.                          |
|                   | Chairman of  the Board &  Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----