alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-8138

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM JOHNSTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, 

Senior District Judge. (3:00-cr-00135-GCM-1)

Submitted: February 21, 2013 Decided: March 6, 2013

Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Johnston, Appellant Pro Se. Robert John Gleason, OFFICE 

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy 

Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, 

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

William Johnston appeals the district court’s order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence 

reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. United States v. Johnston, No. 3:00-cr-00135-

GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 15, 2012). We deny as unnecessary 

Johnston’s motion for a certificate of appealability. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

             COMPUTATION OF DEFICIENCY OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                                 (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                Years Ended
                                                                December 31,
                                                              -----------------
                                                                2001     2000
                                                              --------  -------
<S>                                                           <C>       <C>
Loss before income taxes..................................... $(10,128) $(2,800)
                                                              --------  -------
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                            $ 16,191  $ 4,071
                                                              --------  -------
    Total fixed charges...................................... $ 16,191  $ 4,071
                                                              ========  =======
Total earnings available for payment of fixed charges........ $  6,063  $ 1,271
                                                              ========  =======
Deficiency of earnings to fixed charges...................... $(10,128) $(2,800)
                                                              ========  =======
</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of CHDT Corporation on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2009, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Report”), I, Stewart Wallach, Chief Executive Officer of the Company of
the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:





(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Stewart
Wallach


Stewart
Wallach


CEO,
Director


(Principal
Executive Officer)








May 13,
2009








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RONNIE SANTANA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1167

[August 8, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County; Dan L. Vaughn, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 472011CF000416A.

Ronnie Santana, Madison, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. Bettendorf, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, GERBER and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IA

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 23

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide

for four-year terms for Representatives and to provide that no person

may serve as a Representative for more than twelve years.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 7, 1997

Mr. STUMP introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to provide for four-year terms for Representatives

and to provide that no person may serve as a Representative for more than twelve years.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several
2

•HJ 23 IH

1 States within seven years from the date of its submission

2 by the Congress:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE—

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. The term of office of a Representative

5 shall be four years, beginning with the first election of

6 Representatives occurring after this article becomes opera7 tive.

8 ‘‘SECTION 2. No person may serve more than twelve

9 years as a Representative. But this Article shall not pre10 vent any person holding the office of Representative dur11 ing the term within which this article becomes operative

12 from holding the office of Representative during the re13 mainder of such term.’’.

Æ
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: 

### Ankus, L.L.C. v. U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee

Appellate case number: 01

- 18

- 00777

- CV

Trial court case number: 2017

- 48651

Trial court: 281st District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: August 19, 2020

Party filing motion: Appellant

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is denied

.

Judge’s signature:

___

/s/ Julie Countiss

_______ Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Justices Keyes, Goodman, and Countiss

.

Date: December 17, 2020
Order filed April 16, 2013. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00214-CV

____________

BOMA O. ALLISON, Appellant

V.

SERVICE LLOYDS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 412th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 67540

O R D E R

This is an appeal from a judgment signed November 16, 2012. Appellant 

filed a timely motion for new trial. The notice of appeal was due February 14, 

2013. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant did not file the notice of appeal timely, 

and she did not file a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal. The notice 

of appeal was filed February 26, 2013, a date within 15 days of its due date. The 

Texas Supreme Court has determined that a motion for extension of time is 
“necessarily implied” when the perfecting instrument is filed within fifteen days of 

its due date. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). 

Appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because of the late filing and 

appellant’s failure to file a motion for extension of time. While an extension may 

be implied, appellant is still obligated to come forward with a reasonable 

explanation to support the late filing. See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Ctr. Assocs., 

Ltd., 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.). 

In accordance with our practice, we grant appellant 10 days from the date of 

this order to file a proper motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal in 

compliance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3;

10.5(b). Appellee’s motion to dismiss shall remain pending. If appellant does not

file a proper motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal containing a 

reasonable explanation for the late filing on or before April 26, 2013, the court 

will consider dismissal of the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

2
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 32.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of The Jones Financial
Companies, L.L.L.P. on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 24, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Steven Novik, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership,
certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and
                  results of operations of the Partnership.

                           /s/  Steven Novik
                           ---------------------------------------
                           Chief Financial Officer
                           The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P.
                           November 5, 2004
<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.1                                                     PACIFICNET INC.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-QSB
filed by Pacicnet Inc. (the "Issuer") for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.

Date:  August 5, 2003                  By: /s/ Tony Tong
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Tony Tong
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
# Euroopan unionin C 114A/28.

| | ISSN 1977-1053 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 114A |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 61. vuosikerta28. maaliskuu 2018 |

ISSN 1977-1053

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 114A

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

61. vuosikerta28. maaliskuu 2018

---

| Ilmoitusnumero | Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Ilmoitukset |
| | HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT |
| | Euroopan parlamentti |
| 2018/C 114 A/01 | Valintamenettely PE/199/S — Väliaikainen toimihenkilö – johdon avustaja (AD 5) — Soveltuvien hakijoiden luettelo | 1 |

Ilmoitusnumero

Sisältö

Sivu

V   Ilmoitukset

HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT

Euroopan parlamentti

2018/C 114 A/01

Valintamenettely PE/199/S — Väliaikainen toimihenkilö – johdon avustaja (AD 5) — Soveltuvien hakijoiden luettelo

1

---

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

V Ilmoitukset

HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT

Euroopan parlamentti

| 28.3.2018 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CA 114/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2018

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CA 114/1

---

VALINTAMENETTELY PE/199/S

Väliaikainen toimihenkilö – johdon avustaja (AD 5)

SOVELTUVIEN HAKIJOIDEN LUETTELO

(2018/C 114 A/01)

| 1. | FISCHER, Jessica Isabell |
| --- | --- |

1.

FISCHER, Jessica Isabell

| 2. | LEMAIRE, Cléo |
| --- | --- |

2.

LEMAIRE, Cléo

| 3. | COURTADE, Christelle |
| --- | --- |

3.

COURTADE, Christelle

Soveltuvien hakijoiden luettelo on voimassa 31. joulukuuta 2020 asti.

---
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FE BRUARY 5, 2014

NO. 03

- 12

- 00800

- CR

Leeroy Suarez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTIC ES PEMBERTON AND FIE LD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the tr i a l court on November 1,

2012 . Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no

reversible error in the trial court’s judgment of conviction . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial

court’s judgment of conviction

. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no

adjudication of costs is made.
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 69

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the German Government should

investigate and prosecute Dr. Hans Joachim Sewering for his war crimes

of euthanasia committed during World War II.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 2, 1996

Mr. SANTORUM (for himself and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) submitted the following

concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign

Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the German Government should investigate and prosecute Dr. Hans

Joachim Sewering for his war crimes of euthanasia committed during World War II.

Whereas Dr. Hans Joachim Sewering was a member of the

Nazi party beginning on November 11, 1933, as well as

a member of the SS;

Whereas Dr. Sewering served as staff physician and medical

director at the Schoenbrunn Sanitarium beginning in

1942;

Whereas, between 1943 and 1945, under Dr. Sewering’s supervision, 909 German Catholic mentally and physically
2

•SCON 69 IS

disabled patients, mainly children, were transferred from

the sanitarium to a ‘‘Healing Center’’ at Eglfing-Haar;

Whereas, subsequently, these patients were killed by starvation and an overdose of a sleeping drug, Luminal;

Whereas there is documentation with Dr. Sewering’s signature on it that transfers a 14-year-old epileptic girl

named Babette Frowis from the sanitarium to the healing center on October 26, 1943;

Whereas Babette Frowis was pronounced dead on November

16, 1943, just 15 days after being transferred there by

Dr. Sewering;

Whereas Dr. Sewering has enjoyed a successful and lengthy

medical career after the war, most recently acting as the

President of the Federal Physicians’ Chamber in Germany;

Whereas 4 Franciscan nuns, who worked in the sanitarium

at the time these acts occurred, came forward in January

of 1993 to corroborate the accusations against Dr.

Sewering made by physicians in Germany;

Whereas these nuns broke a 50-year-long vow of silence at

the suggestion of the Bishop of Munich to expose Dr.

Sewering and share their accounts of the patients;

Whereas, upon being elected president-elect of the World

Medical Association in 1993, protest by the American

Medical Association about his alleged crimes led Dr.

Sewering to resign as president-elect;

Whereas the German Government has never conducted a

criminal inquiry or indicted Dr. Sewering;

Whereas the German Government has all of the patient

records, including the signature of the doctor that or-
3

•SCON 69 IS

dered the transfers to the ‘‘Healing Center’’, in a government archival center, and these records have never been

examined by government prosecutors; and

Whereas the German Government has so far protected this

criminal: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 German Government should investigate and prosecute Dr.

4 Hans Joachim Sewering for his war crimes of active eu5 thanasia and crimes against humanity committed during

6 World War II.

Æ
EX-10.65

 EXHIBIT 10.65
 

 

 AMENDMENT TO REMANCO CONSULTING AGREEMENT
 

 This amendment to the Independent Consulting Agreement described in the following paragraph is made effective this 17th day of October 2013.
 

 "This Independent Consulting Agreement ("'Agreement"), effective as of November 15, 2011 ("Effective Date") is entered into by and between Blue Earth, Inc., a Nevada corporation (herein referred to as the "Company'') and Remanco, Inc., a Delaware corporation (herein referred to as the "Consultant")."
 

 The Agreement shall remain in full force and unchanged except for the terms that are amended by mutual agreement specifically the Amended Terms, as specified below.
 

 1.
 The Consultant shall be defined as David J. Lies, an individual, with an address at 146 Edgemere Way South, Naples Florida 34105.
  
 2.
 The Term of the Agreement shall be extended through November 14, 2014.
  
 3.
 The Company shall  pay Consultant through  the Issuance of 100,000 warrants to purchase 100,000 shares of restricted stock of the Company, at an exercise price of $0.01 per share with a term of 5 years (the "Warrants'').
 

 4.
 The Warrants shall be issued in the name specified by Consultant and the Warrants shall be subject to the same conditions and representations as specified in the Agreement.
  
 5.
 All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall be unchanged.
 

 

 


 
 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.
 

 AGREED TO:
 

 Company:
 

 BLUE EARTH, INC.
 

 

 By:  /s/ Johnny Thomas
 Name: Johnny Thomas
 Title: CEO
 

 Consultant:
 

 David J. Lies, an Individual
 

 By:  /s/ David J. Lies
 Name: David J. Lies
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8306 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8306

   To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish a pilot 
  program to furnish hyperbaric oxygen therapy to a veteran who has a 
       traumatic brain injury or post-traumatic stress disorder.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 17, 2020

 Mr. Murphy of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish a pilot 
  program to furnish hyperbaric oxygen therapy to a veteran who has a 
       traumatic brain injury or post-traumatic stress disorder.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans National Traumatic Brain 
Injury Treatment Act''.

SEC. 2. PILOT PROGRAM TO FURNISH HYPERBARIC OXYGEN THERAPY TO A VETERAN 
              WITH TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY OR POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS 
              DISORDER.

    (a) Establishment.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall 
implement a pilot program to furnish HBOT to a veteran who has a 
traumatic brain injury or post-traumatic stress disorder through a 
health care provider described in section 1703(c)(5) of title 38, 
United States Code.
    (b) Locations.--The Secretary shall select three Veterans 
Integrated Service Networks in which to operate the pilot program.
    (c) Funding.--
            (1) There is in the general fund of the Treasury a fund to 
        be known as the ``VA HBOT Fund'' (in this Act referred to as 
        the ``Fund'').
            (2) The sole source of monies for the Fund shall be 
        donations received by the Secretary for express purposes of the 
        Fund.
            (3) Amounts in the Fund shall be available to the Secretary 
        without fiscal year limitation to pay for HBOT under subsection 
        (a).
            (4) The Fund shall terminate on the termination date under 
        subsection (d).
    (d) Termination.--The pilot program shall terminate on the day that 
is five years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (e) HBOT Defined.--In this Act, the term ``HBOT'' means hyperbaric 
oxygen therapy with a medical device--
            (1) approved by the Food and Drug Administration; or
            (2) issued an investigational device exemption by the Food 
        and Drug Administration.
                                 <all>
```
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 326

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol on

Mandela.Congressional Gold Medal to Nelson RolihlahlaSeptember 23, 1998, for the presentation of the
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 326

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the rotunda of the Capitol is authorized

3 to be used on September 23, 1998, for the presentation

4 of the Congressional Gold Medal to Nelson Rolihlahla

5 Mandela. Physical preparations for the ceremony shall be
2

•HCON 326 EH

1 carried out in accordance with such conditions as the Ar2 chitect of the Capitol may prescribe.

Passed the House of Representatives September 18,

1998.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 4.9


 


English Language Summary


 


Authorization Agreement for Radiofrequency Blocks Personal Mobile Service– Termo de Outorga de Autorização de Uso de Blocos de Radiofrequências Associadas ao Serviço Móvel Pessoal No. 514/2012/ SPV-ANATEL


 



	
Parties:

	
Telefônica Brasil S.A., as authorizee, and Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações (ANATEL), as grantor.


	 	 
	
Date:

	
October 16, 2012.


	 	 
	
Expiration:

	
October 18, 2027.


	 	 
	
Purpose:

	
Authorization to use blocks of radiofrequency associated with Personal Mobile Service, without exclusivity, primarily in sub-bands 2,550 to2,570 MHz and 2,670 to 2,690 MHz.


	 	 
	
Area:

	
Region III of the General Plan of Personal Mobile Service Authorization, which includes the state of São Paulo.


	 	 
	
Amount:

	
R$574,558,358.62 (five hundred seventy-four million, five hundred and fifty-eight thousand, three hundred fifty-eight reais and sixty-two cents). 10% of the total value was paid upon signing, the remainder will be paid in 2013.


	 	 
	
Renewal:

	
This license may be renewed only once, for 15 years. The amount due for the renewal will be payable every two years during the extension period for an amount corresponding to 2% (two percent) of the revenues of the Personal Mobile Service provider for the year preceding payment, net of taxes and social contributions. On the 15th year the provider must pay 1% of its revenue for the previous year.


	 	 
	
Penalty:

	
Breach of the Authorization Agreement and applicable regulations to Multimedia Communication Services may result in administrative proceedings by ANATEL, the application of warning sanctions, fines, temporary suspension or revocation of licenses.