alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-40688

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Julio Cesar Casas, Jr., 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:21-CR-76-1

Before Higginbotham, Higginson, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Julio Cesar Casas, Jr. on appeal 

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Casas has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. In 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 8, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-40688 Document: 00516349260 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/08/2022
No. 21-40688

2

light of our recent opinions in United States v. Martinez, 15 F.4th 1179, 1180-

81 (5th Cir. 2021), United States v. Mejia-Banegas, 32 F.4th 450 (5th Cir. 

2022), and United States v. Henderson, 29 F.4th 273, 276 (5th Cir. 2022), we 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 21-40688 Document: 00516349260 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/08/2022
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 24, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin Bastien, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Kevin BastienChief Financial OfficerThe Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P.November 5, 2010
Exhibit 32.2

                                  Certification

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Long Island Physician Holdings
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Concetta Pryor, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Concetta Pryor
-----------------------------
Concetta Pryor
Chief Financial Officer

August 16, 2004

      This certification accompanies the above-described Report on Form 10-Q
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except
to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
IA

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 104

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1998, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 9, 1997

Mr. LIVINGSTON introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Appropriations

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

1998, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 106(3) of Public Law 105–46 is further

4 amended by striking ‘‘November 9, 1997’’ and inserting

5 in lieu thereof ‘‘November 10, 1997’’, and each provision

6 amended by sections 122 and 123 of such public law shall

7 be applied as if ‘‘November 10, 1997’’ was substituted for

8 ‘‘October 23, 1997’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       3,210,014
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  234,956
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    369,255
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,439,302
<PP&E>                                       2,572,666
<DEPRECIATION>                               (158,613)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,440,829
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,750,444
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        14,484
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,440,829
<SALES>                                      1,011,945
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,367,533
<CGS>                                          679,953
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,504,645
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               100,341
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             204,382
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,713,069)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





         In connection with the amended quarterly report of The Jones
Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. on Form 10-Q for the period ending September
26, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven Novik, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and
                  results of operations of the Company.

                           /s/ John W. Bachmann
                           ---------------------------------------
                           Chief Executive Officer
                           The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P.
                           December 3, 2003

                           /s/ Steven Novik
                           ---------------------------------------
                           Chief Financial Officer
                           The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P.
                           December 3, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Jones
Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. and will be retained by the Jones Financial
Companies, L.L.L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 19, 2019

NO. 03-18-00706-CV

Aleana Sullivan, Appellant

v.

Cody Sullivan, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 395TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND SMITH

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the final order signed by the trial court on October 5, 2018. Having 

reviewed the record, the Court holds that Aleana Sullivan has not prosecuted her appeal and did 

not comply with a notice from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal 

for want of prosecution. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication 

of costs is made.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8252 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8252

   To require the Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency to 
 require each enterprise to include a military service question on the 
   form known as the Uniform Residential Loan Application above the 
      signature line of such application, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 15, 2020

Mr. Green of Texas (for himself and Mr. Rouda) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency to 
 require each enterprise to include a military service question on the 
   form known as the Uniform Residential Loan Application above the 
      signature line of such application, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MILITARY SERVICE QUESTION.

    (a) In General.--Subpart A of part 2 of subtitle A of title 13 of 
the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 4541 et 
seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 1329. UNIFORM RESIDENTIAL LOAN APPLICATION.

    ``The Director shall, not later than 6 months after the date of the 
enactment of this section, require each enterprise to--
            ``(1) include a military service question on the form known 
        as the Uniform Residential Loan Application; and
            ``(2) position such question above the signature line of 
        the Uniform Residential Loan Application.''.
    (b) Rulemaking.--The Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency 
shall, not later than 6 months after the date of the enactment of this 
section, issue a rule to carry out the amendment made by this section.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.2




                                  CERTIFICATION

            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of BF Enterprises, Inc. a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify that (1) this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at September 30,
2002 and December 31, 2001 and its results of operations for the three-month and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2002.






 Date:  November 14, 2002                  /s/ S. Douglas Post
                                           -------------------------
                                           S. Douglas Post
                                           Vice President, Treasurer and
                                           Chief Financial Officer






The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of a separate
disclosure document.
#### John O. SINCLAIR, Petitioner-Appellant v. J. Scott WILLIS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee

No. 17-50853 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 16, 2018

John O. Sinclair, Pro Se

Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

John O. Sinclair, federal prisoner # 21082-056, appeals the district court’s determination that his challenge to his federal sentence is not cognizable under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Sinclair challenges the career offender enhancement on the basis that he is actually innocent of one of the predicate offenses. He argues that Section 2241 is available to him because his claim “would be meritorious if it could be reviewed under 28 U.S.C. § 2256” and review is unavailable under that statute. Therefore, his incarceration as a career offender creates a miscarriage of justice and that he is entitled to relief under Section 2241 because of his actual innocence of the predicate offense.

We review the dismissal of Sinclair’s petition *de novo. See Pack v. Yusuff,*218 F.3d 448, 451 (5th Cir. 2000). Because he did not rely on a retroactively applicable Supreme Court decision indicating that he may have been convicted for a nonexistent offense, Sinclair did not show that Section 2255 was an inadequate or ineffective remedy, and the district court did not err in dismissing the petition. *See Reyes-Requena v. United States,*243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001); *Pack,*218 F.3d at 451.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 276

Expressing the sense of the Congress that United States foreign policy with

respect to the Middle East peace process should not include an attempt

to require Israel to make concessions which Israel does not believe

to be in its self-interest, including concessions which would jeopardize

the security of Israel.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 13, 1998

Mr. SAXTON submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that United States

foreign policy with respect to the Middle East peace

process should not include an attempt to require Israel

to make concessions which Israel does not believe to

be in its self-interest, including concessions which would

jeopardize the security of Israel.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) United States foreign policy with respect to

4 the Middle East peace process should not include an

5 attempt to require Israel to make concessions which

6 Israel does not believe to be in its self-interest, in-
2

•HCON 276 IH

1 cluding concessions which would jeopardize the secu2 rity of Israel; and

3 (2) the role of the United States in such peace

4 process should be that of a facilitator in an attempt

5 to bring the parties to the peace process to a mutual

6 agreement as opposed to declaring the terms of the

7 agreement on a unilateral basis.

Æ
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 27, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-10024

Summary Calendar

JAVIER SAUCEDA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JANAY B. WILLIAMS; LARRY HELLUMS; DAVID SCOTT; CARY COOK; 

KELLI WARD; WILLIAM BARDIN,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:05-CV-202

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Javier Sauceda, Texas prisoner # 839353, proceeding pro se

and in forma pauperis (IFP), appeals the district court’s

dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e) as frivolous and for failure to state a claim. Sauceda

raised claims concerning the confiscation of a pair of Nike

tennis shoes and the resulting disciplinary proceeding.

A dismissal under § 1915(e)(2)(B) as frivolous is reviewed

for abuse of discretion, while a dismissal for failure to state a
No. 06-10024

-2-

claim is reviewed de novo. Harper v. Showers, 174 F.3d 716, 718

& n.3 (5th Cir. 1999). Although Sauceda may be permitted to

assert his claims in a § 1983 action, see Allen v. Thomas, 388

F.3d 147, 148-49 (5th Cir. 2004), Sauceda has not shown that the

district court erred in dismissing his § 1983 claim for

deprivation of property. See Zinermon v. Burch, 494 U.S. 113,

127-28 (1990); Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S.

532, 542 (1985).

Sauceda also asserts that his civil rights were violated

when prison officials filed a false disciplinary charge against

him. The district court correctly determined that Sauceda’s

assertions concerning his disciplinary proceeding were barred by

Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994); cf. Wilkinson v. Dotson,

544 U.S. 74, 82 (2005). Further, as for the district court’s

determination that certain claims were barred for Sauceda’s

failure to exhaust administrative remedies, Sauceda does not

challenge this determination. As a result, Sauceda has abandoned

this issue, and this court need not address it. See Yohey v.

Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993); Brinkmann v.

Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir.

1987). 

Sauceda further asserts that he should have been afforded an

opportunity to amend his complaint before it was dismissed. The

district court acted within its authority when it dismissed

Sauceda’s complaint without affording Sauceda the opportunity to
No. 06-10024

-3-

amend his complaint. See § 1915(e). A district court does not

err in dismissing a case without providing an opportunity to

amend when no viable claim is perceptible from the underlying

facts asserted in the plaintiff’s pleadings. See Jones v.

Greninger, 188 F.3d 322, 326-27 (5th Cir. 1999). 

AFFIRMED.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

A ugust 16 , 2019 

# Order

Clerk August 16 , 2019

156 444 ( 66)(67)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 156444

v COA: 337715

Wayne CC: 11

- 010003

- FC

SHOKELLE REON McKAY

, Defendant

- Appellant

. _________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant

- appellant to withdraw his

motion for reconsideration of this Court’s order of June 26, 2019, is GRANTED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.4

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-3 of US Unwired Inc. of our report dated March 8, 2002
relating to the financial statements of IWO Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries,
which appears in the Current Report on Form 8-K of US Unwired Inc. dated April
1, 2002. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in
such Registration Statement.

                                        /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Albany, New York
April 1, 2002
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

ELVINO ALBERTO CAGNARDI,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 869 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of May, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32

                         CERTIFICATION OF 10-QSB REPORT
                                       OF
                         CHADMOORE WIRELESS GROUP, INC.
                       FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2003



1.   The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
     Officer of Chadmoore Wireless Group, Inc. This Certification is made
     pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This
     Certification accompanies the 10-QSB Report of Chadmoore Wireless Group,
     Inc. for the quarter ended June 20, 2003.



2.   We certify that such 10-QSB Report fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
     information contained in such 10-QSB Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     Chadmoore Wireless Group, Inc.



This Certification is executed as of August 18, 2003.


                                /s/ ROBERT W. MOORE
                                ------------------------------------------
                                Robert W. Moore, Chief Executive Officer


                                /s/ STEPHEN K. RADUSCH
                                ------------------------------------------
                                Stephen K. Radusch, Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Chadmoore Wireless Group, Inc. and will be retained by Chadmoore
Wireless Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.