alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p080471.en2.txt

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 08-0471

Post-Focus Draft 8/15/2008

Second Post-Focus Report 7/22/2009

ENGINEER: Arnold \ JAS

PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER:

USE:

OTHER USES:

MSDS: Yes Label: No

CRSS (06/23/2008):

Chemical Name:

S-H20: 130 g/L @

VP: 1.0E-6 torr @

MW: 211.35 %<500 %<1000

Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:

Consumer Use: 

SAT (concerns) (06/24/2008):

Migration to groundwater: Negligible

PBT rating: P2B1T1

Health: 2-3 Dermal, Inhalation, 

Eco: 2 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 200ppb),

Page 1

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 4
p080471.en2.txt

XB Testing (Testing desired)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2A

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 08-0471

Use:

Number of Sites/ Location: 

Days/yr: 

Basis: 

Process Description:

Page 2

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 4
p080471.en2.txt

destroyed, per submission/CRSS)

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium. 

High End:

to: 

from:

basis:

Output 2: 

to: 

from: 

basis:

 

Output: 

to: 

from:

Output 2: 

to: 

from: 

basis: 

Output 2:

to: 

from: 

basis: 

RELEASE TOTAL

kg/yr - 

Page 3

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 4
p080471.en2.txt

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis:

Inhalation:

Exposure to 

Upper Bound: 

Number of workers (all sites) with inhalation exposure: 

Basis:

INHALATION MONITORING DATA REVIEW

1) Uncertainty (estimate based on model, regulatory limit

 or data not specific to industry): 

2)a) Exposure level > 1 mg/day? 

 OR

 b) Hazard Rating for health of 2 or greater?

Inhalation Monitoring Data Desired? 

met)

Dermal:

Exposure to 

High End: 

Number of workers (all sites) with dermal exposure:

Basis:

Exposure to 

High End: 

Number of workers (all sites) with dermal exposure: 

Basis:

Exposure to 

High End: 

Number of workers (all sites) with dermal exposure: 

Basis:

Page 4

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 4.11


 


English Language Summary


 


Authorization Agreement for Radiofrequency Blocks Personal Mobile Service– Termo de Outorga de Autorização de Uso de Blocos de Radiofrequências Associadas ao Serviço Móvel Pessoal No. 516/2012/SPV-ANATEL


 



	
Parties:

	
Telefônica Brasil S.A., as authorizee, and Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações (ANATEL), as grantor.


	 	 
	
Date:

	
October 16, 2012.


	 	 
	
Expiration:

	
October 18, 2027.


	 	 
	
Purpose:

	
Authorization to use blocks of radiofrequency associated with Personal Mobile Service, without exclusivity, primarily in sub-bands 2,550 to2,570 MHz and 2,670 to 2,690 MHz.


	 	 
	
Area:

	
Region III of the General Plan of Personal Mobile Service Authorization, which includes the state of São Paulo.


	 	 
	
Amount:

	
R$227,096,713.69 (two hundred twenty-seven million, ninety-six thousand, seven hundred and thirteen reais and sixty-nine cents). 10% of the total value was paid upon signing, the remainder will be paid in 2013.


	 	 
	
Renewal:

	
This license may be renewed only once, for 15 years. The amount due for the renewal will be payable every two years during the extension period for an amount corresponding to 2% (two percent) of the revenues of the Personal Mobile Service provider for the year preceding payment, net of taxes and social contributions. On the 15th year the provider must pay 1% of its revenue for the previous year.


	 	 
	
Penalty:

	
Breach of the Authorization Agreement and applicable regulations to Multimedia Communication Services may result in administrative proceedings by ANATEL, the application of warning sanctions, fines, temporary suspension or revocation of licenses.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Foreign Assets Control

# AGENCY:

Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing the names one or more persons that have been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC's determination that one or more applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them.

# DATES:

                        See                         **Supplementary Information**                         section for effective date.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

OFAC: Andrea Gacki, Director, tel.: 202-622-2490; Associate Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202-622-2420; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480; Assistant Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202-622-4855; or the Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 202-622-2490.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Electronic Availability

                    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are available on OFAC's website (                    *www.treasury.gov/​ofac*).                

## Notice of OFAC Action

On March 25, 2022, OFAC determined that the property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following persons are blocked under the relevant sanction's authority listed below.
      ( print page 18872)          ( print page 18873)    

Dated: March 25, 2022.

Andrea M. Gacki,

Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the Treasury.

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P

[FR Doc. 2022-06768 Filed 3-30-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-C
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Mario Mora SOSA, also known as Carmelino Sesa, also known as Mario Mora, also known as Mariano Sosa Mora, Defendant-Appellant

No. 15-20640 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 19, 2017

*222Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Mario Mora Sosa, Pro Se

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Mario Mora Sosa has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 488.(1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mora Sosa has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42,2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the- court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir, R. 47.5.4.
No. 11-10380.

#### Canada *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
gsjk 2013.12.31 EX 10.9






EXHIBIT 10.9


Summary Description of 
Named Executive Officer Compensation


On February 20, 2014, the Management and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of TETRA Technologies, Inc., which is responsible for compensation decisions relating to named executive officers of Compressco Partners GP Inc., approved the following increases in annual base salary levels for our current officers who are identified as named executive officers in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. It is expected that such increases will be made effective on or about April 1, 2014:
	
				
	Named Executive Officer
	Title
	Prior Base Salary
	Increased Base Salary

	Ronald J. Foster
	President 
	$286,000
	$297,440

	James P. Rounsavall
	Chief Financial Officer
	198,900
	206,856

	Kevin W. Book
	Vice President of International Operations
	213,200
	221,728

	Sheri J. Vanhooser
	Vice President of Sales and Business Development
	160,000
	166,400






Each of the above named executive officers has entered into an employment agreement in a form substantially identical to the form of agreement executed by all employees of Compressco Partners GP Inc. Each agreement evidences the at-will nature of employment and does not set forth or guarantee the term of employment, salary, or other incentives, all of which are at the discretion of the Board of Directors of Compressco Partners GP Inc. or the Management and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of TETRA Technologies, Inc. Each named executive officer is eligible to participate in incentive programs generally available to salaried employees of Compressco Partners GP Inc., including health, life, disability and other insurance and benefits, 401(k) Plan, and vacation, paid sick leave, and other employee benefits.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1485

In re: DAVID LEE SMITH,

 Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:17-ct-03063-D)

Submitted: August 16, 2018 Decided: August 20, 2018

Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Lee Smith, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

David Lee Smith petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order vacating the 

district court’s Sept. 14, 2017, order, directing the district court to reverse Smith’s North 

Carolina convictions, and directing the state custodian to release him. We conclude that 

Smith is not entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary 

circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. 

Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available 

only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & 

Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Mandamus may not be used as a 

substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). 

Further, this court does not have jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief against state 

officials, Gurley v. Superior Court of Mecklenburg Cty., 411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 

1969), and does not have jurisdiction to review final state court orders, Dist. of Columbia 

Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 482 (1983).

The relief sought by Smith is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, 

although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of 

mandamus. We warn Smith, however, that future frivolous submissions may result in the 

imposition of monetary sanctions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
No. 11-1173.

#### Brown *v.*Calamos, Trustee of Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund, et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00022

- CR

Deborah K. Blair

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From County Criminal Court No. 3

o f Tarrant County (1289242 )

May 8, 2014

P er C uriam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that t he judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
<PAGE>


                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                               ------------------

                                    FORM 8-K

                             CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT
                          TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

       Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): November 12, 2002

                              --------------------

                          SPINNAKER EXPLORATION COMPANY
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)


                                    Delaware
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

                001-16009                                76-0560101
                ---------                                ----------
        (Commission File Number)            (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

      1200 Smith Street, Suite 800
             Houston, Texas                                77002
             --------------                                -----
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)                 (Zip Code)

       Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (713) 759-1770



<PAGE>



Item 7.       Financial Statements and Exhibits.

         (c)  Exhibits.   The following exhibits are furnished with this report:
              --------

Exhibit No.                       Description
-----------                       -----------

   99.1             Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Spinnaker
                    Exploration Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350

   99.2             Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Spinnaker
                    Exploration Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350


Item 9.       Regulation FD Disclosure.

         On November 12, 2002, the certifications furnished herewith by each of
the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Spinnaker
Exploration Company (the "Company") accompanied the Company's Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 in accordance with 18
U.S.C. (S) 1350.





                                       2

<PAGE>

                                   Signatures

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                            SPINNAKER EXPLORATION COMPANY

Date:    November 12, 2002                  By: /s/ JEFFREY C. ZARUBA
         -----------------                      ---------------------
                                            Name:  Jeffrey C. Zaruba
                                            Title: Vice President, Treasurer and
                                                   Assistant Secretary


                                       3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0220 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. PAUL RUSSELL SMITH,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 14, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening b rief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 8 2021

11/08/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0220
**Exhibit 5.1**

 

March 19, 2003 

 

Cotelligent, Inc. 

100 Theory 

Suite 200 

Irvine, California 92612

 

Re:    Registration Statement on Form S-8

 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

 

We have acted as counsel to Cotelligent, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), in connection with the preparation and filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) of a RegistrationStatement on Form S-8, including the exhibits thereto (the “Registration Statement”), under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”), for the registration by the Company of 5,000,000 shares (the “Shares”) ofCommon Stock, par value $.01 per share, which may be issued under the Company’s 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan (“Plan”). 

 

In connection with this opinion, we have examined originals, or copies certified or otherwise identified to our satisfaction, of theRegistration Statement, the Plan, the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, the Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company, and such other documents, records and other instruments of the Company as in our judgment arenecessary or appropriate for purposes of this opinion. 

 

Based upon the foregoing, we are of the following opinion: 

 

The Shares, when issued in accordance with the terms of the Plan, and for a consideration per Share of not less than the par value per Share, will be duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid andnon-assessable. 

 

We are expressing the opinionsabove as members of the Bar of the State of New York and express no opinion as to any law other than the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. 

 

We consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement. In giving this consent, we do not admit that we areacting within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Act or the rules and regulations of the Commission thereunder.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.6


              [LETTERHEAD - NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.]







           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS
           ---------------------------------------------------------

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Annual Report on Form
10-K of Mission Resources Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended
December 31, 2002, and to the incorporation by reference thereof into the
Company's previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos.
333-63562, 333-54798, 333-57827, 333-27707 and 333-91326, of the references to
this firm relating to the Company's estimated domestic proved reserves as of
December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2002.


                                           NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.


                                           By:  /s/ J. Carter Henson, Jr.
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              J. Carter Henson, Jr.
                                              Senior Vice President


Houston, Texas
April 4, 2003
Wehlin , Jefferson

From: Ungvarsky, John

Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 9:42 AM

To: Wehling, Jefferson

Subject: RE: Feather River Rule 3.19

Attachments: 1H2_2013_Revised_2009_SIP-Appendicies.pdf; IH 1_2013_Revised_2009_SIP.pdf

Hi Jeff—

Rule 3.19 is currently not in the SIP. The original version (adopted on 8/6/98) is not in the SIP. The amended

version from 2011 provides a <0.1 tpd reduction. Both the 1998 and 2011 reductions have already be credited

in the baseline. I asked FRAQMD to submit Rule 3.19 for inclusion in the SIP to help bring its rules in line with

the baseline in the plan.

My hard copies of the plans and appendices have been boxed for placement in common space in our pending

swing space. The box is still on our floor, and I can show it to you if you want to take a look. I’ve attached

copies of the most-recent versions of the plan and appendices.

John Ungvarsky

Environmental Scientist

USEPA, Region 9

75 Hawthorne St. (AIR-2)

San Francisco, CA 94105

415-972-3963

510-667-9743 (alternate work site)

From: Wehling, Jefferson

Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 9:17 AM

To: Ungvarsky, John V Subject: RE: Feather River Rule 3.19

Thanks, John. I still don’t understand how this rule figures into the ozone planning process. The version we are taking

action on was amended in August 2011, so I’m not sure whether the emissions reductions from the amended version

are in the baseline inventory that we recently approved, or whether they are separate, and whether additional

reductions from further amendments to the rule may be forthcoming after 2016. I think it might help if I could look

through the various documents that comprise the 8-hour ozone attainment plan for Sacramento Metro. I think it

included a number of plans and related appendices. I recall that you had a stack of these documents once. Do you still

have them? Could I come up and borrow them for a brief while? Thanks.

From: Ungvarsky, John

Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 9:02 AM

To: Wehling, Jefferson

Subject: Feather River Rule 3.19

Hi Jeff—

FRAQMD Rule 3.19 is in the Sacramento ozone plan that we recently approved, but it is in the form of a

commitment with an adoption year of 2016. The VOC reductions (i.e., <0.1 tpd) are not relied on for

1
attainment or RFP. I’ve attached what is said about 3.19 in the Control Measure and RACM analyses in the

plan appendices.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-04-00032- CV
In t he M at te rof M .R .S.

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. J-22 ,903 , HO NORAB LE W. JEANNE MEURER, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N The district cour

t found beyond a re asonable doubt that M.R.S . committed criminal trespass a nd adjudicate d him delinquent. The court place d him on probation in his mother’s c ustody fo r s ix mon ths
. M.R.S. s tipulated at t rial t hat he intentionally and knowingly enter ed the pr emises of a middle school with notice that such entry was for bidden and without the per mission of the pri nc ipa l, who is the owne r o f t he sc ho ol f

or thi s p ur po se . B y his so le iss ue on

a pp e a l, M .R. S. contends that the district c ourt lacke d jurisdiction over him beca use he should have been tried under
a more specific statute with a less seve re punishment ra ng e. Com

pa reT ex . E du c. Code Ann. § 37.107 (West 1996) (trespass on school g rounds, Class C mis demea nor), with Tex. P en. Code Ann. § 3 0. 05 (We st 20 04 -0 5) (t re sp a ss, Cla ss B mis de me ano r)
. He argue s that, be c a us e the le sse r o ff

e ns e is a Class C mi sdemea

nor and is not w ithin the definition of delinquent conduc t, the district court2

lacke d jurisdiction. See Te x. F am. Cod e Ann. § 51 .0 3( a ) (We st Sup p. 20 04 -05); se e als o T e x. Const. art. V, § 19 (justice c ourt has orig inal jurisdiction over off enses punishable by

fine only ). This Court has conclude d in a similar juvenile ca se, howe ver, that these statutes ar e no t in p ar i m ate ria , that the State could cha rg e the juvenile under either statute, a nd that the district court ha d jurisdiction over t he alleg ation of cr iminal trespass ag ainst the juvenile. See I n the Matter of J.M.R. , N o. 03 -0 3- 00 74 9- CV , s lip op . at 8 (T e x. Ap p. —Aus tin Oc t. 2 1, 20 04 , n o p e t. h .) . T his appea l is controlled by

that decision. We a ff ir m th e jud g me nt o f t

he dis tr ic t c ourt .

Mack K idd, J ustice Be fore J ustices Kidd, B . A. Smith and Pemberton Affir med Filed: Nove mber 18, 2004
#### COM. v. MICHUA-GARFIAS, C.

1732 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/05/2017

CP-01-CR-0000661-2016 (Adams)

Affirmed