alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Functional Genomics of Alzheimer's Disease.                    

*Date:*                         June 1, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Rajasri Roy, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Gateway Building 2W200, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-6477,                         *rajasri.roy@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 30, 2022.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-07111 Filed 4-4-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### COM. v. KIEFER, B.

2925 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/11/2017

CP-64-CR-0000199-2013 (Wayne)

Affirmed — Application to Withdraw as Counsel Granted
**Important legal notice**

*|*

# 12005SA042

**Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded - PART FOUR:TEMPORARY PROVISIONS - TITLE IV:OTHER PROVISIONS - Article 42***Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0217 - 0217*

Article 42

If transitional measures are necessary to facilitate the transition from the existing regime in Bulgaria and Romania to that resulting from the application of the Community veterinary, phytosanitary and food safety rules, such measures shall be adopted by the Commission in accordance with the relevant procedure as determined in the applicable legislation. These measures shall be taken during a period of three years following the date of accession and their application shall be limited to that period.

--------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Bon. w, Loo 0’Dani.l 

Oovemor of Taxa8 

AUStiIl, Texas 

Dear Governor O’DarAel: 

Your oomaunioati 

opinion of this d 

by the jouthweste 

ities between i t.s 

940, requests the 

the oonatruction 

Company of facilange, and Sundown, 

e etetutee of Texruet laws. 

your letter ;i oopy of the 

sooiated Telephone Comne Co.adaalon~ for a 

oessfty pmtainlng tharey advised that in our opinion 

Lioi1itlee of the southwsetsm idsoy, between its Levelland, Texas, 

Texas, under the, facts as preeented, 

oihtion or the statutes of Texas in 

Very truly yours 

.kTTOXNNEY CSNE!LL OF TZUB 

BY (Signed) 

Zollie C. Steaklay 

Aeaistant
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 31149

JAPHUS LOUIS BRIGGS,
Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

PAMELA TOLBERT; JIM TUTEN; MIKE STONE; JOHN BELTON; UNKNOWN PROSECUTOR; LEWIS JONES; OFFICE OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY; LINCOLN PARISH DETENTION CENTER,
Defendants-Appellees

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:16 -CV- 731

Before DENNIS, SOUTHWICK and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Japhus Louis Briggs, who was previously detained at the Lincoln Parish Detention Center and is currently Louisiana prisoner # 536595, moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in this appeal of the sua sponte dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The motion is a challenge to the

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 21, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-31149 Document: 00514165849 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/21/2017No. 16

- 31149

2 district court’s certification that the appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5t h Cir. 1997). Briggs fails to address many of the district court’s conclusions and, otherwise, make s only conclusional statements that the district court erred in dismissing his complaint. Pro se briefs are afforded liberal construction. See Yohey v. Col lins , 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993). Nevertheless, when an appellant fails to identify any error in the district court’s analysis, it is the same as if the appellant had not appealed the decision. Brinkmann v. Dallas Cty. Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Because Briggs has failed to challenge any factual or legal aspect of the district court’s disposition of his claims or the certification that his appeal is not taken in good faith, he has abandoned the critical issue of his a ppeal. See
id . Thus, the appeal lacks arguable merit. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Accordingly, the motion for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh , 117 F.3d

at 202 n.24; 5 TH C IR

. R . 42.2.
T he district court’s dismissal of Briggs’s complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a claim and this court’s dismissal of his appeal as frivolous

count as two strikes for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v.
Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387

- 88 (5th Cir. 1996). Briggs is WARNED that if he accumulates three strikes under § 1915(g), he will not be able to proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g). Case: 16-31149 Document: 00514165849 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/21/2017
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 206 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 206

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony as part 
   of the commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims of the 
                               Holocaust.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 206

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used from 8 o'clock 
ante meridian until 3 o'clock post meridian on April 23, 1998, for a 
ceremony as part of the commemoration of the days of remembrance of 
victims of the Holocaust. Physical preparations for the ceremony shall 
be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the Architect of 
the Capitol may prescribe.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 10, 1998.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
2013.12.31 - 10K EX 10.35








December 16, 2013






Shawn K. Poe


Re:    Renewal of Amended and Restated Retention Agreement
Dear Shawn:
This letter is to serve as your notification that Ply Gem Industries, Inc. has elected to execute its Renewal Term right under your current Amended and Restated Retention Agreement dated November 7, 2008 for a period of one year.  As such, all applicable rights and terms as outlined in your Amended and Restated Retention Agreement will remain in effect through December 31, 2014.
Please sign this letter in the space provided below as your acknowledgment and agreement of this Renewal Term agreement and return this original to me, and retain a copy for your own records.	
		
	 
	Sincerely,

	 
	 

	 
	PLY GEM INDUSTRIES, INC.

	 
	 

	 
	By:  /s/ Gary E. Robinette

	 
	Name:  Gary E. Robinette

	 
	Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	Acknowledged and Agreed:
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	/s/ Shawn K. Poe


	 

	Shawn K. Poe
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 18 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 18

 Congratulating the people of the Republic of Nicaragua on the success 
        of their democratic elections held on October 20, 1996.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 1997

 Mr. Houghton (for himself, Mr. Gallegly, Mr. Ackerman, Mr. Ballenger, 
 and Mr. Gilman) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which 
        was referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Congratulating the people of the Republic of Nicaragua on the success 
        of their democratic elections held on October 20, 1996.

Whereas on October 20, 1996, the people of the Republic of Nicaragua held truly 
        democratic, multiparty elections to choose their government;
Whereas these elections were deemed by international and domestic observers to 
        be free and fair and a legitimate expression of the will of the people 
        of the Republic of Nicaragua;
Whereas on January 10, 1997, Arnoldo Aleman was peacefully sworn in to the 
        office of President of the Republic of Nicaragua and immediately 
        promised to continue down the path to democracy, national reconciliation 
        and reconstruction that was started by the previous administration of 
        President Violeta Barrios de Chamorro; and
Whereas this historic event of democratic elections in the Republic of Nicaragua 
        and the inauguration of President Arnoldo Aleman should be honored: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) congratulates the people of the Republic of Nicaragua 
        for the successful completion of the historic democratic, 
        multiparty elections held on October 20, 1996;
            (2) congratulates former President Violeta Barrios de 
        Chamorro for her personal courage and her commitment to 
        democracy, which have helped her achieve a profound political 
        and economic transition in the Republic of Nicaragua;
            (3) encourages all Nicaraguans to continue to work together 
        after taking this critical step on the long road to lasting 
        peace and democracy;
            (4) recognizes that all Nicaraguans should continue to work 
        together in order to ensure a stable democracy, respect for 
        human rights, a free and market-oriented economy, and social 
        justice for all people;
            (5) reaffirms the commitment of the United States to help 
        the Republic of Nicaragua move toward freedom and democracy; 
        and
            (6) further reaffirms that the United States is strongly 
        committed to encouraging democracy and peaceful development 
        throughout the Western Hemisphere.
                                 <all>
```
Honorable Je D. Hazlewood 

County Attorney 

Canyon, Texas 

Dear Mr. Hazlewoodr Opinion No. O-175. 

Rer Ik.potismLaw 

This office is in reoeipt of your'telegram af January 19 which 

reads as follows: 

%nder~Artiole 432 Psmal Code oaa Anhose 8011 married B's 

daughter hire B to mrk for him?' 

Since you refer to Article 432 o> the Penal Code, m d&l'assnm 

that the employnmt mentioned inmlvea thb employment of'sone person related 

to a ooun+qr offioial in the degree .set forth in your tqlugraa'andthat the 

proposed employee muld drpw ooqensation from* aoumty. 

Article 452 of the Penal Ccide provides, *B oftic& ofthi 5-b 

or any officer of any district, oounty, - . . &al+ appoint, or vote for,-or 

confinnths appointment lm 8.ny office, pxition, clerkship, employmei& or de, 

of any persm related dthimthe second degree by affinieg~or irithilr th.tIiiid 

degree bjr oonsanguimity to the person so appointed or So VOting, . ; .mIititihe 

oalary, fees, or compensation of suoh appointee is to be paid for; direotly or 

indirectly, out of or from public funds or fees of offioe of any kind or oharaoter whatsoever." 

As $d in 2 C. J. 378, blood relationa of the husband and Mood 

relations of the uife are not related to each other by affinity.. Ex 

Earris 6 L.R.A. 713, Fla., Lo- v. State, SO~Southern 45, Ala. 

4's father and the wife's father wufd not ba so related. 

*he 

As aptly pit by Judge C. J. Blaokley ia the ease of Central R.,Co~i'. 

v. Roberts, 91 ffa. 513, 18 S.E? 315:,"5 groom and bride each comes wit&ix& ,.. 

the oirola of the other'o kin; In& skin and kin am still no more related t&m 

they nere.before.' 

You aA, the&ore, advised that tha county officer's dpugkter-inlaw*8 father may be employed without violating the Xqmtism Lax. 

GRLrN:egw 

A.PPR(lITED, 

b/ Gerald C. Mam 

ATToRBEyGBKERALOF' 

Your8 wrytrlqy 

ATTom GRlwiAL OF TXA8 

I&/S/ Glenn R.'Le& 

A.sis-tWt
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus 
constituting part of this Registration Statement on Form S-3 of our report dated
September 13, 1996 appearing on page 29 of PMT Services, Inc.'s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 1996.  We also consent to the 
incorporation by reference of our report on the Financial Statement Schedule, 
which appears on page 55 of such Annual Report on Form 10-K.  We also consent to
the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Prospectus.



/s/ PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP


Nashville, Tennessee
    
January 2, 1996
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                       [LETTERHEAD OF RYDER SCOTT COMPANY]

                                LETTER OF CONSENT

     We hereby consent to the references to us under the heading "Oil and Gas
Reserves" in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PetroCorp Incorporated for the
year ended December 31, 2002.

                                          RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.



Houston, Texas
March 20, 2003
EXHIBIT 11.0

                    INTERCARGO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                   (in thousands, except for per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            For the nine months
                                                                            ended September 30,

                                                                             1998           1997
                                                                            ------         ------
<S>                                                                         <C>            <C>
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:

   Net income                                                                $929          31,771

   Average common shares outstanding                                        7,698           7,661

   Per common share amount                                                  $0.12            4.14
                                                                           ======================


DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:

   Net income                                                                $929          31,771

   Average common shares outstanding                                        7,698           7,661
   Incremental shares from assumed converstions at the average market
   Prices of $11.989 and $10.868, respectively                                 11               6
                                                                           ----------------------

   Weighted average number of common shares outstanding as adjusted         7,709           7,667
                                                                           ======================

   Fully diluted earnings per share                                         $0.12            4.14
                                                                           ======================
</TABLE>



                                       17
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105-2498

 

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Heavy-Duty Hybrid Onboard Diagnostics

FROM: Amy Kopin

TO: The Docket

DATE: July 15, 2011

On May 11th, 2011 we held a conference call with the Eaton to discuss concerns raised 

by Eaton regarding heavy-duty onboard diagnostic (OBD) requirements and timing. During the

comment period for the heavy-duty greenhouse gas notice of proposed rulemaking comments 

were raised that heavy-duty hybrid applications may not be able to meet the 2013 heavy-duty

OBD regulations that were published in the 2009 OBD Final Rulemaking.

1,2

 Specifically, they

have requested a delay of the application of HD OBD requirements for hybrid applications until 

2020. Attendees from the EPA and Eaton are shown in the table below. The agenda is on the 

following page of this memo.

Attendee Affiliation 

Cleophas Jackson EPA – Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division 

Anthony Neam EPA – Assessment and Standards Division 

Amy Kopin EPA – Assessment and Standards Division 

Ian McKenzie Eaton

 

1 U.S. EPA, NHTSA, and DOT, “Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Mediumand Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles,” republished December 29, 2010. Available here: 

http://origin.www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-12-29/html/2010-32726.htm

2 U.S. EPA, “Control of Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles and New Motor Vehicles Engines; Final Rule 

Regulations Requiring Onboard Diagnostic Systems on 2010 and Later Heavy-Duty Engines Used in Highway 

Applications Over 14,000 Pounds; Revisions to Onboard Diagnostic Requirements for Diesel Highway Heavy-Duty 

Vehicles Under 14,000 Pounds,” published February 24, 2009. Available here: 

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/im/obd/regtech/hd-obd-frm-02-24-09-notice-74-fr-8310.pdf

OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105-2498

 

EPA-Eaton Heavy-Duty Hybrid OBD Discussion

2pm-3pm EST May 11, 2011

Agenda

1. What is your current OBD J1939 capability for handling faults?

a. If you don’t have any, how long do you estimate it will take to 

make your current controller’s software J1939 capable?

2. Comprehensive Components:

a. What is your understanding of what you need to do for 

comprehensive components? 

b. Why do you think your current diagnostics won’t meet 

comprehensive components?

c. Given that the hybrid system is only covered under 

comprehensive components, how long will it take for your company

to make your current diagnostics J1939 compatible for fault 

storage and reporting?

d. Do you have the ability to determine an open, shorted to 

voltage, shorted to ground, an irrational sensor, and a

nonfunctioning output component for your hybrid electronical 

components?

3. Are there specific requirements or regulations that you anticipate 

having problems with and can you identify them?

4. EPA Heavy-Duty OBD Rulemaking and Alternative Fuels Timing

5. Next Steps

OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of CHDT Corporation on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2010, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Report”), I, Gerry McClinton, Chief Operating Officer of the Company of
the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.








/s/ Gerry
McClinton


Gerry
McClinton


Chief
Operating Officer, Director


(Principal
Operations Executive)








August
13, 2010








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 11-1424.

#### Brown *v.*Unknown Objectors.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.