alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                            Washington, D.C. 20549



                                   FORM 8-K

                                CURRENT REPORT

    Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934



       Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):  APRIL 2, 1997



                           CROSS TIMBERS OIL COMPANY
            (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



           DELAWARE                   1-10662                  75-2347769
(State or other jurisdiction  (Commission File Number)     (IRS Employer
        of incorporation)                                  Identification No.)



810 HOUSTON STREET, SUITE 2000, FORT WORTH, TEXAS               76102
  (Address of principal executive offices)                   (Zip Code)



                                (817) 870-2800
             (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
<PAGE>
 
ITEM 5.  OTHER EVENTS.

     On April 2, 1997, Cross Timbers Oil Company, a Delaware corporation ("the
Company"), completed the sale of $125 million of 9 1/4% Senior Subordinated
Notes due 2007.  The Company received net proceeds of $121.5 million (before
estimated offering expenses of $454,000 to be paid by the Company) which were
used to repay outstanding indebtedness under the Company's senior bank credit
facility. The Notes were sold to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule
144A of the Securities Act of 1933. The Notes have not been and will not be
registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and may not be offered or sold in
the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from
registration requirements.

                                      -2-
<PAGE>
 
                                   SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

 
                              CROSS TIMBERS OIL COMPANY


Date: April 9, 1997           By:   LOUIS G. BALDWIN
                                    ----------------------------            
                                    Louis G. Baldwin
                                    Senior Vice President and
                                     Chief Financial Officer

                                      -3-
# L_2006374EN.01002001.xml

| 27.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 374/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 374/20

---

Corrigendum to Council Framework Decision 2003/577/JHA of 22 July 2003 on the execution in the European Union of orders freezing property or evidence

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 196 of 2 August 2003
  )

On page 46, in Article 2 ‘Definitions’, in point c:

for:

for:

| ‘(c) | “freezing order” property that could be subject to confiscation or evidence;’, |
| --- | --- |

‘(c)

“freezing order” property that could be subject to confiscation or evidence;’,

read:

read:

| ‘(c) | “freezing order” shall mean any measure taken by a competent judicial authority in the issuing State in order provisionally to prevent the destruction, transformation, moving, transfer or disposal of property that could be subject to confiscation or evidence;’. |
| --- | --- |

‘(c)

“freezing order” shall mean any measure taken by a competent judicial authority in the issuing State in order provisionally to prevent the destruction, transformation, moving, transfer or disposal of property that could be subject to confiscation or evidence;’.

---
IA

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 139

Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to the censure of William

Jefferson Clinton.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 17, 1998

Mr. HOUGHTON (for himself and Mr. KING) introduced the following joint

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to the censure

of William Jefferson Clinton.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That it is the sense of Congress that—

4 (1) on January 20, 1993, William Jefferson

5 Clinton took the oath prescribed by the Constitution

6 of the United States faithfully to execute the office

7 of President; implicit in that oath is the obligation

8 that the President set an example of high moral

9 standards and conduct himself in a manner that fos10 ters respect for the truth; and William Jefferson
2

•HJ 139 IH

1 Clinton, has egregiously failed in this obligation, and

2 through his actions violated the trust of the Amer3 ican people, lessened their esteem for the office of

4 President, and dishonored the office which they have

5 entrusted to him;

6 (2)(A) William Jefferson Clinton lied under

7 oath concerning his conduct with a subordinate;

8 (B) William Jefferson Clinton wrongly took

9 steps to delay discovery of the truth;

10 (C) inasmuch as no person is above the law,

11 William Jefferson Clinton remains subject to crimi12 nal and civil penalties; and

13 (3) William Jefferson Clinton, President of the

14 United States, by his conduct has brought upon

15 himself, and fully deserves, the censure and con16 demnation of the American people and the Congress;

17 and

18 (4) by his signature on this Joint Resolution,

19 William Jefferson Clinton acknowledges this censure

20 and condemnation and voluntarily undertakes and

21 binds himself to do the following:

22 (A) Make a donation to the Treasury of

23 the United States of the sum of $500,000.

24 (B) Not deliver in person any State of the

25 Union address.
3

•HJ 139 IH

1 (C) Not be involved in fund raising activi2 ties for the Democratic Party or for any can3 didate for public office.

4 (D) Not to serve in public office in any ca5 pacity after his term as President is completed.

Æ
----

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Organigram Holdings Inc. (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the period ended August 31, 2019 (the "Report"), the undersigned, Greg Engel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Paolo De Luca, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

November 26, 2019
|   | */s/ Greg Engel*                                                   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Greg Engel

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer) |
|   | */s/ Paolo De Luca*                                                   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Paolo De Luca

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer) |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Organigram Holdings Inc. and will be retained by Organigram Holdings Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-11159

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ELADIO VILLARREAL, Jr.,

a/k/a Seal dft 1,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:94-CR-427-G

- - - - - - - - - -

December 10, 1996

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Eladio Villarreal, Jr., appeals his conviction pursuant to a

guilty plea for conspiracy to distribute 100 kilograms or more of

marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Villarreal contends

that the district court erred by denying his motion to enforce

the plea agreement. Our review of the record, the briefs, and

the authorities convinces us that the district court did not err. 
No. 95-11149

- 2 -

See United States v. Garcia-Bonilla, 11 F.3d 45, 46-47 (5th Cir.

1993). Villarreal failed to show that the Government’s failure 

to move for downward departure pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1,

p.s., was based on an unconstitutional motive and failed to show

that the Government’s failure to outline his cooperation in the

Presentence Report was inconsistent with the parties’ reasonable

understanding of the agreement. See id.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                    ------------

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Golden River Resources
Corporation  (the  "Company")  for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"),
the  undersigned,  Peter  Lee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  that:

(1)  The report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The information  contained  in  the report fairly presents, in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:    May 14, 2010

                                        /S/ Peter Lee
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Peter Lee
                                        Director, Secretary and
                                        Chief Financial Officer

                                       29
**Exhibit 23.1**

** **

**Consent of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm**

 

We have issued our report dated May 23,2016, with respect to our audits of the consolidated and combined financial statements included in the Annual Report of Majescofor the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016. We consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statementof Majesco on Form S-8 (File No. 333-205252).

 

/s/ MSPC, *Certified Public Accountants and Advisors*,P.C.

 

Cranford, New Jersey

October 3, 2016
(logo) LNR

          Partners, LLC

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

**OF**

** **

**LNR PARTNERS, LLC**

** **

** **

The undersigned, Job Warshaw,being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the "Special Servicer"), asspecial servicer under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement, hereby certifies,as of the date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in hiscapacity as an officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individualcapacity, as follows:

 

1. I have reviewed theactivities performed by the Special Servicer under the applicable Pooling andServicing Agreement during the period commencing on January 1, 2016 and endingon December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"), and the SpecialServicer's performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been madeunder my supervision;

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicing criteriaunder Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilled itsobligations under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all materialrespects throughout the Reporting Period

 

 

LNR Partners, LLC, 

A Florida limited liabilitycompany

 

By: /s/ Job Warshaw

Job Warshaw

President

 

 

Dated: February 22, 2017

 

 

1601 Washington Avenue ∙Suite700 ∙ Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164

Telephone: (305) 695-5600 ∙Fax: (305)695-5601
No. 11-1135.

#### Doe, By and Through His Parents Doe et al., et al. *v.*Lower Merion School District.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
NUMBER 13-07-00760-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_______________________________________________________

EUSTACIO HERNANDEZ 

A/K/A ESTACIO HERNANDEZ, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

_______________________________________ ________________

On Appeal from the 36th District Court 

of San Patricio County, Texas.

_______________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Eustacio Hernandez a/k/a Estacio Hernandez, attempts to appeal his

conviction for driving under the influence. The trial court has certified that this “is a pleabargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal,” and “the defendant has waived

the right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).
2

On December 31, 2007, this Court notified appellant’s counsel of the trial court’s

certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant

has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to

whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the

existence of any amended certification.

On January 30, 2008, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel’s response

does not establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or that

appellant otherwise has a right to appeal. 

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed

if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal.

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is

DISMISSED. Any pending motions are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum Opinion delivered 

and filed this the 13 day of March, 2008. th
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Threat Reduction Agency 

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  DTRA Leadership             
  -  DTRA History             
  -  Mission             
  -  Strategic Initiatives             
  -  Foreign Malign Influence             
  -  Agency Overview Brief (pdf)             
  -  Agency Financial Report 
-  Careers & Opportunities    -  Your Civilian Career             
  -  Your Military Career             
  -  Welcome Aboard 
-  Business    -  DTRA Contract Award Data             
  -  Office of Small Business             
  -  Mentor Protege Program 
-  News & Media    -  Press Center 
-  Contact Us		 
-  Joint Operations Center		 

# DTRA FOIA Reading Room Archive

# FOIA Request 22-005 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

## Related Links

22-005 PDF

COVID
#### Eric Joseph DEPAOLA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harold CLARKE; A. David Robinson; Earl Barksdale; Amee Duncan; Lt. Christopher Gilbert; Lt. Kiser; B. Wallace, Safety Officer; Crabtree, Recreational Supervisor; Sgt. Large; Sgt. J. Messer; Sgt. J. Hall; Sgt. J. Dickenson; Sgt. Jason Shepherd; D. Turner, Unit Manager (C Building); Henry Ponton; Steavens, Guard; R. Stanley, Guard; J. T. Fleming, Guard; Lovell, Guard; Hill, Guard; Vaughn, Guard; B. Dodson, Guard; Gentry, Guard; L. Mullins, Institutional Hearings Officer, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-7067

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 21, 2017

Decided: January 11, 2018

Eric Joseph DePaola, Appellant Pro Se.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric DePaola seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice. Before addressing the merits of DePaola’s appeal, we first must be assured that we have jurisdiction. *Porter v. Zook,*803 F.3d 694, 696 (4th Cir. 2015). We may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 545-47, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949), The district court identified deficiencies in two of DePaola’s claims that DePaola may be able to remedy by filing an amended complaint. In ruling on De-Paola’s Eighth Amendment recreation claim, the district court noted that DePao-la failed to allege how often he was denied *793recreation entirely or if he was harmed by the conditions in the recreation cages. Additionally, the district court noted in ruling on the procedural due process claim alleged in Count 3 of the complaint that DePaola failed to allege that the hearing officer was biased or that the evidence the officer failed to consider would have been exculpatory. Because DePaola might be able to cure these defects by filing an amendment to the complaint, we conclude that the order DePaola seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory order. *See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc.,*807 F.3d 619, 623-24 (4th Cir. 2015); *Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392,*10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand the case to the district court with instructions to allow DePaola to amend his complaint. *Goode,*807 F.3d at 630. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED AND REMANDED*
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 255

Authorizing the use of the Capitol grounds for the Greater Washington

Soap Box Derby.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 30, 1998

Mr. HOYER (for himself, Mrs. MORELLA, Mr. WYNN, Ms. NORTON, Mr.

WOLF, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, and Mr. DAVIS of Virginia) submitted the

following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

Transportation and Infrastructure

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the Capitol grounds for the Greater

Washington Soap Box Derby.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SOAP BOX DERBY RACES

4 ON CAPITOL GROUNDS.

5 The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Associa6 tion (hereinafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘As7 sociation’’) shall be permitted to sponsor a public event,

8 soap box derby races, on the Capitol grounds on July 11,

9 1998, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House
2

•HCON 255 IH

1 of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the

2 Senate may jointly designate.

3 SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

4 The event to be carried out under this resolution shall

5 be free of admission charge to the public and arranged

6 not to interfere with the needs of Congress, under condi7 tions to be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol and

8 the Capitol Police Board; except that the Association shall

9 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities

10 incident to all activities associated with the event.

11 SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

12 For the purposes of this resolution, the Association

13 is authorized to erect upon the Capitol grounds, subject

14 to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, such stage,

15 sound amplification devices, and other related structures

16 and equipment as may be required for the event to be car17 ried out under this resolution.

18 SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

19 The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police

20 Board are authorized to make any such additional ar21 rangements that may be required to carry out the event

22 under this resolution.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE REPORT
ON FORM 10-Q OF BAYOU INTERNATIONAL, LTD FOR THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> AUSTRALIAN DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                              68
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       84
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   152
<PP&E>                                             311
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (205)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     258
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              807
<BONDS>                                          3,602
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,388
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,592
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       258
<SALES>                                             39
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    39
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   272
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  73
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    456
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       456
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>