alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 7235** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. RAJUL RUHBAYAN, a/k/a Creme, a/k/a James Vernon Wood, a/k/a James Vernette Johnson, a/k/a Kreem, a/k/a Day

- Ja, a/k/a Deja, a/k/a Amir Ruhbayan, a/k/a Jibra'el Ruh'alamin, a/k/a Jibrael Ruhalamin , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. ( 2:02

- cr - 00029

- RBS

- FBS

- 1; 2:16

- cv - 00473

- RBS )

Submitted : January 17, 2017 Decided: January 19, 2017

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion.
Rajul Ruhbayan, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Mark Salsbury, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Rajul Ruhbayan seeks to appeal the district court ’ s ord er denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a subst antial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court ’ s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ruhbayan has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's Committee on National Science and Engineering Policy hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of National Science Board business as follows:

# TIME AND DATE:

Friday, March 25, 2022, from 11:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m. EDT.

# PLACE:

This meeting will be held by teleconference through the National Science Foundation.

# STATUS:

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        The agenda of the teleconference is: Chair's opening remarks; reviewing lessons learned during the                         *Indicators*                         2022 cycle, and considering potential process changes for the 2024 cycle.                    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

                        Point of contact for this meeting is: Chris Blair,                         *cblair@nsf.gov,*                         703/292-7000. To watch this meeting on YouTube, use this link:                         *https://youtu.be/​3EzHscbsUUw.*                         Updates and other meeting information may be found at the National Science Board website                         *www.nsf.gov/​nsb.*

Chris Blair,

Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.

[FR Doc. 2022-06048 Filed 3-17-22; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Sep 30 2010

Mr. Randy Hansen

Government Relations Director Experimental Aircraft Association 3000 Poberezny Road Oshkosh, WI 54901

Dear Mr. Hansen:

This is the response to your March 22, 2006 letter (public docket No. FAA-2008-1010) on behalf of Experimental Aircraft Associ ation (EAA) in which you petition the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to delete § 61.415(b)(1) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).

EAA’s request for rulemaking was purposely not included in the FAA’s 2006 Notice Of Proposed Rulemaking for Light Sport Aircraft that became a final rule on April 2, 2010. The justification for the request alludes to a cer tificated flight instructor (CFI) holding a commercial pilot certificate having the ability to train an airline transport pilot certificate candidate. Your justification is inaccurate. An airline transport pilot candidate needs no endorsement or instruction from an authorized instructor as this candidate has the ability to self endorse for the practical test.

It has always been the practice that an instructor has the applicable certificate for what is being instructed. In this manner, a subpart H instructor has a minimum of a commercial certificate and, thereby, can complete endorsements through that level. Conversely, a subpart K sport pilot instructor with only a sport pilot certificate can only instruct to that level. This has been addressed on numerous occasions with the last legal interpretation dated July 24, 2009 which has been enclosed for your reference.

Your petition for rulemaking is denied, and we will take no further action on your petition. We are closing Docket No. FAA-2008-1010.

Sincerely,

/s/ Raymond Towles Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         14,471
<SECURITIES>                                   68,920
<RECEIVABLES>                                  37,266
<ALLOWANCES>                                    2,488
<INVENTORY>                                    13,590
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              140,246
<PP&E>                                         45,711
<DEPRECIATION>                                  4,045
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                183,802
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          27,493
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           31
<OTHER-SE>                                    156,278
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  183,802
<SALES>                                        64,565
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               64,565
<CGS>                                          13,145
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  13,145
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               32,812
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                20,714
<INCOME-TAX>                                    7,250
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   13,464
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.42
        


</TABLE>
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 93

Making majority party appointments to the Energy and Natural Resources

Committee, the Veterans’ Affairs Committee, and the Committee on

Indian Affairs.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 24 (legislative day, MARCH 23), 1995

Mr. DOLE submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Making majority party appointments to the Energy and Natural Resources Committee, the Veterans’ Affairs Committee, and the Committee on Indian Affairs.

1 Resolved, That the following shall constitute the ma2 jority party’s membership on the following Senate commit3 tees for the 104th Congress, or until their successors are

4 appointed:

5 ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES: Mr. Murkowski

6 (chairman), Mr. Hatfield, Mr. Domenici, Mr. Nickles, Mr.

7 Craig, Mr. Campbell, Mr. Thomas, Mr. Kyl, Mr. Grams,

8 Mr. Jeffords, and Mr. Burns.
2

SRES 93 ATS

1 VETERANS’ AFFAIRS: Mr. Simpson (chairman), Mr.

2 Murkowski, Mr. Specter, Mr. Thurmond, Mr. Jeffords,

3 Mr. Campbell, and Mr. Craig.

4 INDIAN AFFAIRS: Mr. McCain (chairman), Mr. Mur5 kowski, Mr. Gorton, Mr. Domenici, Mrs. Kassebaum, Mr.

6 Nickles, Mr. Campbell, Mr. Thomas, and Mr. Hatch.

Æ
**Exhibit 3.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION**

** **

**OF**

** **

**AMERICAN HONDA RECEIVABLES LLC**

 

This Certificate ofFormation of American Honda Receivables LLC(the “**Company**”),dated as of March 16, 2011, is duly executed and filed to form a limited liability company in accordance with the Delaware LimitedLiability Company Act (6 Del. C. §18-201, et seq.).

 

1.          Name.The name of the limited liability company is American Honda Receivables LLC.

 

2.          RegisteredOffice.   The address of its registered office in the State of Delaware is c/o The Corporation Trust Company,1209 Orange Street, in the City of Wilmington, County of New Castle, 19801.

 

3.          RegisteredAgent.   The name and address of its registered agent for service of process in the State of Delaware is TheCorporation Trust Company, 1209 Orange Street, in the City of Wilmington, County of New Castle, 19801.

** **

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**,the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Formation of American Honda Receivables LLC as of the 16th day of March, 2011.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4

                       Consent of Independent Accountants


         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Amendment
No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-4 of our report dated September 7,
2001 relating to the combined financial statements of the Gas Compression
Business of Schlumberger Limited, which appears in the Current Report on Form
8-K/A of Hanover Compressor Company dated November 9, 2001. We also consent to
the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Registration Statement.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas
November 25, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 248 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 248

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
  should be reformed by April 15, 2001, in a manner that protects the 
Social Security and Medicare Trust Funds, that is revenue neutral, and 
         that results in a fair and less complicated tax code.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 24, 1998

    Mr. Boyd (for himself and Mr. Stenholm) submitted the following 
concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of Congress that the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
  should be reformed by April 15, 2001, in a manner that protects the 
Social Security and Medicare Trust Funds, that is revenue neutral, and 
         that results in a fair and less complicated tax code.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds that--
            (1) the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is too complicated 
        for the average citizen to understand;
            (2) honest taxpayers spend millions of dollars and 
        countless hours completing tax forms; and
            (3) the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is riddled with 
        loopholes that benefit special interests at the expense of 
        other taxpayers.

SEC. 2. REFORM OF TAX CODE.

    (a) Deadline.--It is the sense of the Congress that the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 should be reformed not later than April 15, 2001.
    (b) Guidelines.--In developing a new tax code, the following 
guidelines should be used:
            (1) Reform of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 must ensure 
        adequate funding of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance 
        Trust Fund, the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund, and 
        the Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund for current 
        recipients and future retirees.
            (2) Such reform must result in a tax code that is revenue 
        neutral. No changes should be made that would result in deficit 
        spending.
            (3) Such reform must result in a tax code that is fair. All 
        Americans should be treated fairly under a new tax code.
            (4) Such reform should promote economic growth by 
        encouraging savings and investment.
            (5) Such reform must result in a tax code that is less 
        complicated. It should take less time for the average American 
        to complete his tax return under a new tax code than is 
        required under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                     CONSENT OF RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.

  We hereby consent to the use of our report dated February 1, 2002 regarding
Torch Energy Royalty Trust interest and to reference to our firm included in
this Form 10-K.

                                  RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.


                                  By:  /s/ Ryder Scott Company, L.P.
                                       ------------------------------

Houston, Texas
March 29, 2002
2012 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

10-4-2012

In Re: Abraham Nee Ntreh

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 12-3634

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2012

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2012 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"In Re: Abraham Nee Ntreh " (2012). 2012 Decisions. Paper 305.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2012/305
GLD-299 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 12-3634

___________

In Re: ABRAHAM NEE NTREH,

Petitioner

____________________________________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the

United States District Court for the District of the Virgin Islands

(Related to D.C. Crim. No. 1:02-cr-00007-001)

____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

September 27, 2012

Before: FUENTES, GREENAWAY, JR., and BARRY, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: October 4, 2012)

_________

OPINION

_________

PER CURIAM

We discussed the unusual background of Ntreh’s criminal case in a previous 

opinion, see In re Ntreh, 401 F. App’x 686 (3d Cir. 2010) (per curiam), and will 

not repeat ourselves here. According to his mandamus petition, in March 2012 

Ntreh formally waived his right to be present during his resentencing; having now 

provided such a waiver, Ntreh argues that our intervention is necessary to ensure 
2

his resentencing. To the contrary: the District Court docket reflects that Ntreh’s 

pending motions, including his request to set a firm sentencing date (the last of 

which was scheduled for February 2012, but was continued), will be heard at an 

omnibus hearing to take place in December 2012.

1

 It appears that the District 

Court intends to exercise its jurisdiction in due course, see In re Patenaude, 210 

F.3d 135, 140 (3d Cir. 2000), and we detect no other extraordinary factors that 

would suggest that mandamus relief is warranted at this time. See Birdman v. 

Office of the Governor, 677 F.3d 167, 174 (3d Cir. 2012). Accordingly, Ntreh’s 

petition for mandamus will be denied, without prejudice to his renewing the 

request should the delay in District Court become newly protracted. See Madden 

v. Myers

 1 The December date is due to the assigned District Judge being on medical leave. We 

note that this scheduling order was entered after Ntreh filed his mandamus petition, so he 

would not have been aware of it at the time.

, 102 F.3d 74, 79 (3d Cir. 1996).
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

In view of the possible materiality of the financial condition of Torch Energy
Advisors Incorporated ("Torch") financial condition to the Minimum Price
commitment, which relates to the Purchase Contract between the Trust and Torch,
Torch's financial statements are provided as an exhibit to the Trust's annual
report on Form 10-K.  Upon the termination of the Minimum Price commitment, such
financial statements will not be included in this annual filing.
#### IN RE: ESTATE OF Edward C. WAGNER, Deceased Petition of: Janet S. Wagner and James R. Wagner, Jr.

No. 223 WAL 2017

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

January 3, 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 42 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 42

Regarding the waiver of diplomatic immunity in cases involving serious 
                           criminal offenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 1997

Mr. Duncan (for himself, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. Traficant, and Mrs. Myrick) 
 submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to 
                the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Regarding the waiver of diplomatic immunity in cases involving serious 
                           criminal offenses.

Whereas the United States was founded on the principle that all men are equal 
        before the law and anyone, rich or poor, is entitled to the protection 
        of the law and also subject to just penalties under the law;
Whereas international treaties regarding diplomatic and consular immunity place 
        diplomatic and consular officials from foreign countries in the unique 
        situation of being above the law and not subject to prosecution for 
        criminal offenses committed in the United States;
Whereas recent events indicate that this situation is endangering the safety and 
        security of citizens and other persons residing in the United States;
Whereas in the vehicular manslaughter case involving a Georgian diplomat in 
        Washington, the Department of State has been able to secure the 
        agreement of the Georgian Government to waive the diplomat's immunity; 
        and
Whereas it is incumbent on the President and Secretary of State to alleviate the 
        injustice of the situation regarding diplomatic and consular immunity: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) the President and Secretary of State should take all 
        necessary steps to ensure that whenever there is probable cause 
        to believe that an individual who is entitled to immunity from 
        the criminal jurisdiction of the United States, due to 
        diplomatic or consular immunity, may have committed a serious 
        criminal offense, the country such individual represents waives 
        the immunity of that individual; and
            (2) whenever there is probable cause to believe that a 
        United States individual who is entitled to immunity from the 
        criminal jurisdiction of a foreign country due to diplomatic or 
        consular immunity commits a serious criminal offense, the 
        United States should waive the individual's immunity.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           2,019
<SECURITIES>                                       603
<RECEIVABLES>                                      178
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,636
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                            817
<COMMON>                                           378
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,688
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,636
<SALES>                                          2,599
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,007
<CGS>                                            1,430
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,430
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,094
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  43
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    432
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                432
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       432
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>