alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Leonel Ponce BARRAZA, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 16-71575

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted January 16, 2018 *

Filed January 19, 2018

*479Eva Garcia-Mendoza, Esquire, Garcia-Mendoza & Snavely Chtd., Las Vegas, NV, for Petitioner

Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Jane Tracey Schaff-ner, Don George Scroggin, Esquire, Trial At, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent

Before: REINHARDT, TROTT, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Leonel Ponce Barraza, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“U”) decision denying his request for a continuance. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a continuance and review de novo questions of law. *Ahmed v. Holder,*569 F.3d 1009, 1012 (9th Cir. 2009). We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Ponce Barraza’s request for an additional continuance for lack of good cause, where he had been given time for preparation but did not file an asylum application prior to the IJ’s deadline. *See*8 C.F.R. §§ 1003.29, 1003.31(c); *Taggar v. Holder,*736 F.3d 886, 889 (9th Cir. 2013) (applications not submitted by the deadline set by the IJ are deemed waived); *Ahmed,*569 F.3d at 1012 (listing factors to consider). The record does not support Ponce Barraza’s contention that the BIA erroneously required him to show prima facie eligibility for asylum or submit an asylum application on appeal in order to show good cause for a continuance,

Ponce Barraza’s related due process claim fails for lack of prejudice. See *Lata v. INS,*204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error and substantial prejudice to prevail on a due process challenge).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Wilbert S. BRODIE, also known as Kharii Wilston Anthony Brodie, Appellant

No. 17-3078

September Term, 2017

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Filed On: December 20, 2017

Elizabeth Trosman, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USAQ Appellate Counsel, U.S. Attorney’s Office, (USA) Appellate Division, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee

Wilbert S. Brodie, Pro Se

BEFORE: Rogers, Srinivasan, and Wilkins, Circuit Judges

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 84(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders filed June 14, 2016 and October 5, 2016 be affirmed. Appellant seeks a writ of coram nobis, arguing that the evidence at trial was insufficient to show that he made false statements on a loan application to any FDIC-insured institution. Appellant raised this argument during his trial and on direct appeal and has not identified any error “not correctible on direct appeal,” United States v. McCord, 509 F.2d 334, 341 (D.C. Cir. 1974), or otherwise demonstrated that the “extraordinary remedy” of coram nobis relief is required “to achieve justice,” United States v. Morgan, 346 U.S. 502, 511, 74 S.Ct. 247, 98 L.Ed. 248 (1954); see also United States v. Denedo, 556 U.S. 904, 911, 129 S.Ct. 2213, 173 L.Ed.2d 1235 (2009). Nor has appellant shown that the alleged error was “of the most fundamental character, ... such as rendered the proceeding itself irregular and invalid.” United States v. Addonizio, 442 U.S. 178, 186, 99 S.Ct. 2235, 60 L.Ed.2d 805 (1979) (quoting United States v. Mayer, 235 U.S. 55, 69, 35 S.Ct. 16, 59 L.Ed. 129 (1914)).

*694To the extent appellant raised a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in his district court petition, he has not renewed that claim on appeal, and accordingly it is deemed forfeit. See United States ex rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp., 380 F.3d 488, 497 (D.C. Cir. 2004). Finally, appellant argues on appeal that the wire fraud charges against him were brought outside the applicable limitations period, and that his convictions are void for lack of jurisdiction regardless of whether he satisfied the requirements for a writ of coram nobis, but those arguments were not presented to the district court and “cannot be considered for the first time on appeal.” United States v. Stover, 329 F.3d 859, 872 (D.C. Cir. 2003).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 46

A resolution making majority party appointments to the Ethics Committee

for the One Hundred Fourth Congress.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 11 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 1995

Mr. LOTT (for Mr. DOLE) submitted the following resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

A resolution making majority party appointments to the

Ethics Committee for the One Hundred Fourth Congress.

1 Resolved, That the following shall constitute the ma2 jority party’s membership on the following Senate commit3 tee for the One Hundred Fourth Congress, or until their

4 successors are appointed:

5 ETHICS: Mr. McConnell (chairman), Mr. Smith, and

6 Mr. Craig.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 23, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 16455]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06164]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


U.S. Section Membership Opportunities for the United States-India 
CEO Forum

AGENCY: International Trade Administration (ITA), Department of 
Commerce.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Commerce, ITA, is amending the Notice published 
at 87 FR 9318 (February 18, 2022), regarding the dates for submission 
of applications for appointment, or reappointment, to the U.S. Section 
of the U.S.-India CEO Forum. ITA will accept applications on a rolling 
basis for membership on the U.S. Section of the Forum for terms that 
will begin upon appointment and will expire on December 31, 2024. 
Immediate consideration will now be given to applications received by 
April 6, 2022. ITA will accept nominations under this notice on an on-
going basis during the charter term to fill vacancies as they arise.

ADDRESSES: For inquiries and an application, please contact Noor 
Sclafani, International Trade Specialist, Office of South Asia, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e98786869bc79a8a85888f888780a99d9b888d8cc78e869f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fe9091918cd08d9d929f989f9097be8a8c9f9a9bd0999188">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Noor Sclafani, International Trade 
Specialist, Office of South Asia, U.S. Department of Commerce, 
telephone: (202) 823-1840.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Please refer to Notice published at 87 FR 
9318 (February 18, 2022).

    Dated: March 18, 2022.
Jed Diemond,
Deputy Director, Office of South Asia.
[FR Doc. 2022-06164 Filed 3-22-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-HE-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000814780
<NAME>                        Enex Oil & Gas Income Program III - Series 3, L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   sep-30-1996
<CASH>                                         15611
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  36633
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               53913
<PP&E>                                         2636352
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2129676
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 560589
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          45414
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     443301
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   560589
<SALES>                                        254453
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               254453
<CGS>                                          59163
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  59163
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               24912
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   103173
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 330

Expressing the sense of the Congress that official mail sent by Government

agencies at taxpayer expense should be subject to certain uniform standards.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 25, 1998

Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN submitted the following concurrent resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that official mail sent

by Government agencies at taxpayer expense should be

subject to certain uniform standards.

Whereas franked mail sent from within the legislative branch

of the Government is subject to strict regulations relating

to their content as well as the tracking of expenses associated therewith; and

Whereas the executive branch of the Government, by contrast, is not similarly subject to uniform regulations on

the content of taxpayer-financed penalty mail: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that

3 agencies within the executive branch of the Government
2

•HCON 330 IH

1 should be required annually to purge their mailing lists

2 to ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently, and

3 to report on the accuracy of such lists.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 206 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 206

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony as part 
   of the commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims of the 
                               Holocaust.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 1998

    Mr. Yates (for himself and Mr. Gilman) submitted the following 
  concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                               Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony as part 
   of the commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims of the 
                               Holocaust.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used from 8 o'clock 
ante meridian until 3 o'clock post meridian on April 23, 1998, for a 
ceremony as part of the commemoration of the days of remembrance of 
victims of the Holocaust. Physical preparations for the ceremony shall 
be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the Architect of 
the Capitol may prescribe.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, J. Michael Lawrie, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of Siebel Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Siebel Systems, Inc.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand
hereto as of the 5th day of November 2004.

|/s/ J. Michael LawrieChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive
      Officer)
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I, Kenneth A. Goldman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of Siebel Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Siebel Systems, Inc.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand
hereto as of the 5th day of November 2004.

|/s/ Kenneth A. GoldmanSenior Vice President, Finance
      andAdministration and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial
      Officer)
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which
it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Siebel Systems, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q),
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

PALM BEACH POLO, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

VILLAGE OF WELLINGTON, FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-1066

[April 18, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; G. Joseph Curley, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502019CA001617.

Alexander L. Domb of Alexander L. Domb, P.A., Wellington, for 

appellant.

Laurie Stilwell Cohen and Rachel R. Bausch of Village of Wellington, 

Wellington, and Elliot B. Kula and William D. Mueller of Kula & Associates, 

P.A., Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, DAMOORGIAN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ChrisKen Partners Cash Income Fund
L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, John F. Kennedy, President (Principal Executive
Officer) of ChrisKen Income Properties, Inc., the Managing General Partner of
the Partnership, and Robert Mayer, Acting Principal Financial Officer of
ChrisKen Income Properties, Inc., the Managing General Partner of the
Partnership, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.

Date: November 11, 2005


                                     By: /s/ John F. Kennedy
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         John F. Kennedy
                                         President
                                         ChrisKen Income Properties, Inc.,
                                            Managing General Partner
                                         ChrisKen Partners Cash Income Fund L.P.


                                     By: /s/ Robert Mayer
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Robert Mayer
                                         Acting Principal Accounting Officer
                                         ChrisKen Income Properties, Inc.,
                                            Managing General Partner
                                         ChrisKen Partners Cash Income Fund L.P.


                                       18
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 214

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the contributions of the cities of BrisMusic, and for other purposes. people to the origins and development of Country tol, Tennessee, and Bristol, Virginia, and their
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 214

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the cities of Bristol, Tennessee, and Bristol, Virginia, have long been a gathering place for musicians

from the nearby mountainous countryside;

Whereas phonographic recordings made in Bristol in August

of 1927 launched the careers of the Carter Family and

Jimmie Rodgers, who are recognized as the first commercially successful modern Country Music artists;
2

•HCON 214 EH

Whereas these recordings have been called the ‘‘Big Bang of

Country Music’’ by the Country Music Foundation in its

publication ‘‘Country, the Music and the Musicians’’;

Whereas Jimmie Rodgers has been named the Father of

Country Music and was the first artist to be inducted

into the Country Music Hall of Fame;

Whereas the original members of the Carter Family have

been recognized as Country Music’s First Family in part

because their works have had an unparalleled influence

on succeeding generations of Country Music artists;

Whereas ‘‘The Roots of Country Music’’, a three-part television series which aired nationally on the Turner Broadcasting System in June of 1996, recognized the significant contribution of the cities of Bristol to the development and commercial acceptance of Country Music;

Whereas in 1984 the Tennessee Senate recognized Bristol as

the ‘‘Birthplace of Country Music’’; and

Whereas in 1995, the Virginia General Assembly recognized

Bristol as the ‘‘Birthplace of Country Music’’: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) recognizes the critical contributions of the

4 cities of Bristol, Tennessee, and Bristol, Virginia,

5 and their residents to the origins and development of

6 Country Music;

7 (2) congratulates the cities of Bristol, Ten8 nessee, and Bristol, Virginia, for launching with the
3

•HCON 214 EH

1 Bristol recordings of 1927 the careers of the Na2 tion’s first widely known Country Music artists; and

3 (3) acknowledges and commends the cities of

4 Bristol, Tennessee, and Bristol, Virginia, as the

5 birthplace of Country Music, a style of music which

6 has enjoyed broad commercial success in the United

7 States and throughout much of the world.

Passed the House of Representatives October 9,

1998.

Attest:

Clerk.
<PAGE>

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                    FORM 8-K


               Current Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
                      The Securities Exchange Act of 1934


      Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):  December 21, 2001



                               NEON SYSTEMS, INC.
             (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)



<TABLE>
<S>                                       <C>                            <C>
            Delaware                               0-25457                          76-0345839
(State or other jurisdiction of           (Commission File Number)      (IRS Employer Identification Number)
incorporation or organization)
</TABLE>


                       14100 SOUTHWEST FREEWAY, SUITE 500
                            SUGAR LAND, TEXAS  77478
             (Address of Registrant's principal executive offices)


                                 (281) 491-4200
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)



                                      N/A
         (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
<PAGE>

ITEM 5.  OTHER EVENTS.

     On December 21, 2001, NEON Systems, Inc. issued a press release announcing
that it had entered into a non-binding term sheet to be granted a two-year
option to acquire Scalable Software, Inc.  In addition, NEON Systems, Inc.
announced in such press release that Louis R. Woodhill and James Woodhill were
appointed as directors to the Board of Directors of NEON Systems, Inc., to serve
until they are elected by a vote of the stockholders of NEON Systems, Inc. or
until their successors are elected and qualified. The press release is filed as
Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K, and the contents of such
Exhibit are incorporated herein by reference.


ITEM 7.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.

     (c)  Exhibits.

Exhibit
Number          Description of Document
-------         -----------------------

99.1            Press Release dated December 21, 2001.



                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Dated:  December 21, 2001

                                 NEON SYSTEMS, INC.



                                 /s/ James Bradford Poynter
                                 ---------------------------------------
                                 Name:   James Bradford Poynter
                                 Title:  Chief Financial Officer
                                         (Principal financial officer)
<PAGE>

                               INDEX TO EXHIBITS


Exhibit
Number                     Description of Document
-------                    -----------------------
99.1                       Press Release dated December 21, 2001.