alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,736
<SECURITIES>                                    33,997
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,322
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,600
<PP&E>                                           2,577
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  66,081
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,522
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      56,446
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    66,081
<SALES>                                         33,790
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,790
<CGS>                                           18,599
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,599
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,264
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,987)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,052)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,935)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,935)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.23)
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Haywood Benard HALL, also known as Haywood Hall, also known as Haywood Hall Johnson, also known as Haywood Johnson, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-10486 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 20, 2018

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Haywood Benard Hall, Pro Se

Before REAVLEY, CLEMENT, and HO, Circuit Judges.

*459PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Haywood Renard Hall has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hall has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>


                                                                      EX. 99.2

                                 CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of North
American Technologies Group, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2002
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Kevin Maddox                                          Dated: August 13, 2002
-------------------------------------
Kevin Maddox
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, David M Long, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer, of Biofield Corp.
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-SSB of the Company for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: November 15, 2005
                                       By: /s/ DAVID M. LONG
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           David M. Long, Jr., M.D., Ph.D.
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)

                                       26
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 09-2255

___________ In re: Cheryl Anne Reagan, * * Debtor, * * ----------------------------------- * * Cheryl Anne Reagan, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * Bankruptcy Appellate Panel * for the Eighth Circuit. Frederick S. Wetzel, III, Trustee; * 1919 M Street Associates; * [UNPUBLISHED] G. Latt Bachelor, Personal * Representative of the Estate of * Ronald E. Reagan, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: March 15, 2010 Filed: March 18, 2010

___________ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.1 The Honorable Ben T. Barry, United Stat es Bankruptcy Judge for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas. -2- Cheryl Anne Reagan appeals from the judgment of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) affirming the or der of the bankruptcy court, 1 which denied her motion to dismiss the case or remove the trust ee, and approved the conversion of her case from a case under Chapter 11 to a case under Ch apter 7. We agree with the BAP that the bankruptcy court did not abuse its di scretion in denying Reagan’s motions to dismiss the case or to remove the trustee, or in finding that her case should be converted to a Chapter 7 proceeding. SeeIn re M & S. Grading, Inc. , 541 F.3d 859, 867 (8th Cir. 2008) (denial of motion to re move trustee is reviewed for abuse of discretion); In re Hedquist , 450 F.3d 801, 804 (8th Cir. 2006) (bankruptcy court’s decision whether to dismiss Chapter 11 case is reviewed for abuse of discretion); In re Lumber Exch. Bldg. Ltd. P’ship , 968 F.2d 647, 648 (8th Cir. 1992) (bankruptcy court has broad discretion in deciding whethe r to dismiss or convert Chapter 11 case). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. As to Reagan’s challenge to the bankruptcy court’s order approving the terms of the sale of Federal News Service, Inc. (FNS), which is part of the bankruptcy estate, we conclude that this issue is moot. Th e bankruptcy court has since rescinded the sale of FNS and instructed the trustee to obtain new bids for the company. Thus, at this time there is no order of sale, and Reagan’s objections to the sale price are no longer relevant. See PFS Dist. Co. v. Raduechel , 574 F.3d 580, 599-600 (8th Cir. 2009) (case is moot when it no longer presents actual, ongoing case or controversy). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

______________________________
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

 

The undersigned, Robert S.Herlin, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer ofEvolution Petroleum Corporation (the “Company”), certifies in connection withthe filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2009 (the “Report”) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to hisknowledge, that:

 

1. The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this certification as of the 13th day of November, 2009.

 
|   | /s/ ROBERT S. HERLIN                   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Robert S. Herlin                       |
|   | Chairman of the Board                  |
|   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to EvolutionPetroleum Corporation and will be retained by Evolution Petroleum Corporationand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.  The foregoing certificate isbeing furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to thisForm 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.

 

1

----
No. 11-1256.

#### Van Staden *v.*St. Martin.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         171,235                 171,235
<SECURITIES>                                    17,251                  17,251
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,706                  10,706
<ALLOWANCES>                                       453                     453
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               209,915                 209,915
<PP&E>                                          95,792                  95,792
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,778                  37,778
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 315,571                 315,571
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,186                  42,186
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          150,806                 150,806
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       186,389                 186,389
<OTHER-SE>                                   (220,924)               (220,924)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   315,571                 315,571
<SALES>                                         21,579                  57,725
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,579                  57,725
<CGS>                                           22,906                  60,834
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,147                 104,778
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                   6,491
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    14                     133
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,390                  10,885
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (26,237)                (70,985)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (26,237)                (70,985)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                   3,042
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (26,237)                (67,943)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.79)                  (4.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.79)                  (4.71)
        

</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 32004D0121 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32004D0121

**2004/121/EC: Commission Decision of 6 February 2004 adjusting the thresholds referred to in Article 157(b) and Article 158(1)(a) and (c) of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of the Financial Regulation **

*
Official Journal L 036 , 07/02/2004 P. 0058 - 0058 *

Commission Decision

of 6 February 2004

adjusting the thresholds referred to in Article 157(b) and Article 158(1)(a) and (c) of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of the Financial Regulation

(2004/121/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 of 23 December 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities(1), and in particular Article 271 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 271(2) stipulates that the thresholds applicable to public procurement contracts are to be adjusted every two years pursuant to the provisions of the directives on the coordination of public procurement procedures.

(2) The euro equivalents of the thresholds, fixed in SDR(2) in the directives, which are to be applied from 1 January 2004 have been published in the Official Journal(3),

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The euro equivalents of the thresholds applicable to public procurement contracts shall be adjusted as set out below, with effect from 1 January 2004:

>TABLE>

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. It shall be notified to the other institutions and bodies by the Commission's accounting officer.

Done at Brussels, 6 February 2004.

For the Commission

Michaele Schreyer

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 1.

(2) Special drawing rights.

(3) OJ C 309, 19.12.2003, p. 14.
No. 11-1358.

#### Williams *v.*Booker, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       4,787,831
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              195,535,962
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             342,294,322
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        61,778
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               342,294,322
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,626,152
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,198,095
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               203,579
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,487,589
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,428,057
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,837,644
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,590,413
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,590,413
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39


</TABLE>
#### Thomas William BROWNING, Petitioner-Appellant, v. A. MANSUKHANI, Warden Federal Correctional Inst—Estill, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-7664

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 22, 2018

Decided: February 27, 2018

Thomas William Browning, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas William Browning appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. *See Aikens v. Ingram,*652 F.3d 496, 501 (4th Cir. 2011) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process."'

*AFFIRMED*
EXHIBIT
        32.1


CERTIFICATION


OF


CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND


CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Tony
      Tong, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
      PacificNet Inc. for the three months ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of PacificNet Inc.





I,
      Dan
      Lui, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
      PacificNet Inc. for the three months ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of PacificNet Inc.




By: /s/
      Tony Tong


Tony
      Tong


Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)





By: /s/
      Dan Lui


Dan
      Lui


Chief
      Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)
### Karen McBrien, Plaintiff, 

### v. United States et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Civil Action No.
Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 

# FILED AUG 13 

## 2009 Clerk 

### Us o· .



### Sank . . ,strictand ruptcy COurts 

# 09 

# 1527

The plaintiffhas filed an application to proceed in fonnapauperis and a pro se complaint. I The Court will grant the application to proceed in fonna pauperis and dismiss the complaint. The events that fonn the basis ofthe complaintinthis action are, generally speaking, the same events that fonned the basis ofthe action in McBrien v. FBIetai., Civil ActionNo. 09-197, which was dismissed because the events alleged presented the sort of"fantastic or delusional scenarios" that warrant dismissal ofan action as frivolous underNeitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319,328 (1989). 

### See Mem. Op., Civil ActionNo. 09-197 (D.D.C. Feb. 3,2009). This complaint

I Plaintifffiled the two documents received by the Clerk ofCourt on August 4 and August 6, 2009. Both were entitled "Complaint PlaintiffsNotice ofFiling FTCA Claim" (hereinafter "notices"), and in both notices the first sentence stated that "PlaintiffKaren McBrien 

### intends to" file a complaint underthe Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. 

### § 2674 et seq. ("FTCA"). Notices at 1 (emphasis added). In addition, on August 6, 2009, the Clerkreceived a third document entitled "Complaint for FTCA Claim for Personal Injury; Damages; Intentional Tort; Negligence" (hereinafter "complaint"), which stated that "PlaintiffKaren McBrien files this Complaint for personal damages ...." Complaint at 1. Only one applicationto proceed in fonna pauperis was received. All three documents carry identical captions and make reference to substantiallythe same events and impressions. Accordingly, the court construes two ofthe submissions as notices and the other submission as a complaint.L presents the same fantastic and delusional scenarios ofa nationwide conspiracy involving the plaintiffs relatives, former relatives, and numerous state and federal agencies who work in concert to spy on, control, injure, and trick the plaintiff. This complaint, too, warrants dismissal as frivolous. 

### Neitzke, 490 U.S. at 328. Accordingly, onthe court's authority under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (requiring dismissal offrivolous complaints that are filed by plaintiffs proceeding 

### informapauperis), this complaint will be dismissed. A separate order accompanies this memorandum



# -- Date:

# ~ 

# 9'; )..00 

# 1

- 2 -
1 The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United St ates District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-2729

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Western District of Missouri. * Phillip Ellis, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: August 7, 2008 Filed: August 8, 2008

___________ Before MELLOY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Phillip Ellis appeals the 180-month prison sentence the district court 1 imposed upon his guilty plea to conspiracy to distribut e and possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of cocaine base and “som e amount” of powder cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), 846, and distribution of co caine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C), 2. He also consented to forfeiture of $70,257.96 pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853. His counsel ha s filed a brief under A nders v. California ,-2- 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he seeks leave to withdraw, arguing the district court erred in imposing too high a sentence. Ellis pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea agr eement that contained a waiver of his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. We will enforce the appeal waiver here. The record reflects that Ellis understood and voluntarily accepted the terms of the plea agreement, including the appeal waiver; th e appeal falls within the scope of the waiver; and we conclude that no injus tice would result from enforcing it. SeeUnited States v. Andis , 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (discussing enforceability of appeal waiver); United States v. Estrada-Bahena , 201 F.3d 1070, 1071 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (enforcing appeal waiver in Anders case). Having reviewed the record i ndependently under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issu es for appeal beyond the scope of the waiver. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________