alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 265

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the East Front of the CapArts. John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing itol Grounds for performances sponsored by the
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 265

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),
2

•HCON 265 EH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZING USE OF EAST FRONT FOR PER2 FORMANCES SPONSORED BY KENNEDY CEN3 TER.

4 In carrying out its duties under section 4 of the John

5 F. Kennedy Center Act (20 U.S.C. 76j), the John F. Ken6 nedy Center for the Performing Arts in cooperation with

7 the National Park Service (in this resolution jointly re8 ferred to as the ‘‘sponsor’’) may sponsor public perform9 ances on the East Front of the Capitol Grounds at such

10 dates and times as the Speaker of the House of Represent11 atives and Committee on Rules and Administration of the

12 Senate may approve jointly.

13 SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

14 (a) IN GENERAL.—Any performance authorized

15 under section 1 shall be free of admission charge to the

16 public and arranged not to interfere with the needs of

17 Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by the Archi18 tect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board.

19 (b) ASSUMPTION OF LIABILITIES.—The sponsor shall

20 assume full responsibility for all liabilities incident to all

21 activities associated with the performance.

22 SEC. 3. PREPARATIONS.

23 (a) STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.—In consultation

24 with the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the

25 Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate, the

26 Architect of the Capitol shall provide upon the Capitol
3

•HCON 265 EH

1 Grounds such stage, sound amplification devices, and

2 other related structures and equipment as may be required

3 for a performance authorized under section 1.

4 (b) ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.—The Architect of

5 the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board may make such

6 additional arrangements as may be required to carry out

7 the performance.

8 SEC. 4. APPLICABILITY OF PROHIBITIONS.

9 Nothing in this resolution may be construed to waive

10 the applicability of the prohibitions established by section

11 4 of the Act of July 31, 1946 (40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat.

12 718), concerning sales, displays, and solicitations on the

13 Capitol Grounds.

14 SEC. 5. EXPIRATION OF AUTHORITY.

15 A performance may not be conducted under this reso16 lution after September 30, 1998.

Passed the House of Representatives May 7, 1998.

Attest:

Clerk.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 224

Urging international cooperation in recovering children abducted in the United

States and taken to other countries.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 25, 1998

Mr. BERRY (for himself, Mr. LAMPSON, Mr. FRANKS of New Jersey, Mr.

CRAMER, Mr. HUTCHINSON, Mr. SNYDER, Mr. COOKSEY, Mr. SCHIFF,

Mr. FROST, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. TURNER, Ms. FURSE,

Mr. MATSUI, Mr. DICKEY, Mr. MCINNIS, Mr. FOLEY, and Mr. SANDLIN)

submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Urging international cooperation in recovering children

abducted in the United States and taken to other countries.

Whereas many children in the United States have been abducted by family members who are foreign nationals and

living in foreign countries;

Whereas children who have been abducted by an estranged

father are very rarely returned, through legal remedies,

from countries that only recognize the custody rights of

the father;

Whereas there are at least 140 cases that need to be resolved

in which children have been abducted by family members

and taken to foreign countries;
2

•HCON 224 IH

Whereas, although the Convention on the Civil Aspects of

International Child Abduction, done at the Hague on October 25, 1980, has made progress in aiding the return

of abducted children, the Convention does not address the

criminal aspects of child abduction, and there is a need

to reach agreements regarding child abduction with countries that are not parties to the Convention; and

Whereas decisions on awarding custody of children should be

made in the children’s best interest, and persons who violate laws of the United States by abducting their children

should not be rewarded by being granted custody of those

children: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress urges international co3 operation in working to resolve those cases in which chil4 dren in the United States are abducted by family members

5 who are foreign nationals and taken to foreign countries,

6 and in seeing that justice is served by holding accountable

7 the abductors for violations of criminal law.

Æ
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

February 26, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00056-CV

DR. THEODORE M. HERRING, JR. AND CARMEN DAWSON, Appellants

V.

HERON LAKES ESTATES OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 281st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2006-74019

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed December 31, 2012. On February 

12, 2013, appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. 

The motion is granted.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Brown, and Busby.
# Official Journal C 64E/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 64E |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5020 March 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 64E

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5020 March 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory Acts |
| | Council |
| 2007/C 064E/01 | Common Position (EC) No 1/2007 of 11 December 2006 adopted by the Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the approval of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles (‘Framework Directive’) (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory Acts

Council

2007/C 064E/01

Common Position (EC) No 1/2007 of 11 December 2006 adopted by the Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the approval of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles (‘Framework Directive’) (1)

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 14854]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6045]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7824]

The Designation of Jemmah Anshorut Tauhid (JAT), Also Known as 
Jemmah Ansharut Tauhid, Also Known as Jem'mah Ansharut Tauhid, Also 
Known as Jamaah Ansharut Tauhid, Also Known as Jama'ah Ansharut Tauhid, 
as a Foreign Terrorist Organization Pursuant to Section 219 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act, as Amended

    Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled in this 
matter and in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary 
of the Treasury, I conclude that there is a sufficient factual basis to 
find that the relevant circumstances described in section 219 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (hereinafter ``INA'') (8 
U.S.C. 1189), exist with respect to Jemmah Anshorut Tauhid, also known 
as Jemmah Ansharut Tauhid, also known as Jem'mah Ansharut Tauhid, also 
known as Jamaah Ansharut Tauhid, also known as Jama'ah Ansharut Tauhid.
    Therefore, I hereby designate the aforementioned organization and 
its aliases as a Foreign Terrorist Organization pursuant to section 219 
of the INA.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: February 23, 2012.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-6045 Filed 3-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 1731** 

FREDRIS SERRANO

- RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Fredis Serrano

- Rodriguez , Petitioner ,

v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted : December 13, 2016 Decided: December 19, 2016

Before KEENAN and HARRIS , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition d ismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Chris E. Greene, GREENE & ASSOCIATES, INC., Charlotte, North Carolina , for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Carl McIntyre, Assistant Director, Gregory A. Pennington, Jr. , Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DE PARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Fredris Serrano

- Rodriguez (Serrano), a native and citizen of Honduras , petitions for review of an order of the Board of

I mmigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of his request for cancellation of removal. As noted by the Board, Serrano did not argue that the IJ erred in finding him ineligible for cancellation of removal, but instead contended that “the Board should reconsider its interpretation of the alien smuggling provision under [8 U.S.C. § 1182](a)(6)(E)(i) [2012] of the [Immigration and Nationality] Act.” Serrano raises new arguments, however, before this court. He now argues that the agency erred in finding him ineligible for cancellation of removal, claiming that his case is distinguishable from our decision in Ramos v. Holder , 660 F.3d 200 (4th Cir. 2011) , and that the record is inconclusive as to whether he engaged in alien smuggling

. We lack jurisdiction over these new claims, which were not properly exhausted before the Board. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1) (2012) (“A court may review a f inal order of removal only if .

. . the alien has exhausted all administrative r emedies available to the alien as of right.”); Kporlor v. Holder , 597 F.3d 222, 226 (4th Cir. 2010) (“It is well established that an alien must raise each argument to the [Board] before we have jurisdiction to consider it.” (internal quotations omitted)). Accordingly, we3 dismiss the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ndufola KIGHAM, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-10625 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 20, 2018

*479James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Ndufola Kigham, Pro Se

Before REAVLEY, CLEMENT, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Ndufola Kigham has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Kigham has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel; Deciphering Immune-CNS Interactions in HIV (R01, R21).                    

*Date:*                         April 14, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Rebecca Steiner Garcia, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center,  6001 Executive Blvd., Room 6149, MSC 9608, Bethesda, MD 20892-9608, 301-443-4525,                         *steinerr@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.242, Mental Health Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

      ( print page 15443)    
 Dated: March 15, 2022. 

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-05771 Filed 3-17-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### Jennifer PERKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. US AIRWAYS, INC.; US Airways Group; American Airlines Group, successor by merger with US Airways Inc.; US Airways Health Benefit Plan, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-1565

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 29, 2017

Decided: January 19, 2018

Nekki Shutt, Jacqueline M. Pavlicek, BURNETTE SHUTT *&*MCDANIEL, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Shannon M. Barrett, Deanna M. Rice, O’MELVENY *&*MYERS, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jennifer Perkins appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on her complaint asserting claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461 (2012), and *189the Medicare Secondary Payer Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1395y(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Perkins v. US Airways, Inc.,*No. 6:14-cv-02577-BHH, 2015 WL 5783561, 2016 WL 4208099, 2017 WL 1196805 (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2015; Aug. 10, 2016; Mar. 31, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 **ANNUALSTATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

 

Reference is herebymade to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1,2014, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, asDepositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTOCAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as CertificateAdministrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and SITUS HOLDINGS, LLC as OperatingAdvisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, COMM2014-UBS5 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section10.11 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.      Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.      To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<CIK> 0000815555
<NAME> NATIONAL INSURANCE GROUP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            13,972
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       2,159
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  25,165
<CASH>                                           4,955
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           2,492
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,976
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                  2,446
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                              5,819
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                    833
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,693
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,339
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,976
<PREMIUMS>                                       8,648
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                899
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  13,961
<BENEFITS>                                       2,886
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      3,983
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            14,124
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,515
<INCOME-TAX>                                       875
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,640
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,640
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .41
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                   2,199
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                              2,741
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                  145
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               1,080
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 1,559
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                  2,446
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                            145
        

</TABLE>
|                                       |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                       |  |
| Citibank, N.A.                        | Deutsche Bank Trust Company Delaware |
| As AART Indenture Trustee             | As AART Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Kristen Driscoll     | 1011 Centre Road, Suite 200 |
| 388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor | Wilmington, DE 19805-1266 |
| New York, NY 10013                    |   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
|   |   |
|   |   |
|   |   |
|   |   |
|   |   |
|   |   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| Re:    | AART 2014-SN2 - Administration Agreement |
|   | Annual Statement as to Compliance |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Administrator during the period of January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015, and of its performance under the Administration Agreement has been under his supervision, and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Administrator has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Administration Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
|   | Ally Financial Inc. |
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 122

Designating James R. Ketchum as Curator Emeritus of the United States

Senate.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 22 (legislative day, MAY 15), 1995

Mr. DOLE (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating James R. Ketchum as Curator Emeritus of the

United States Senate.

Whereas James R. Ketchum will retire from the United

States Senate after 25 years as Senate Curator, and 35

years of Government service;

Whereas he has dedicated his Senate service to preserving the

works of art, history, and traditions of the Senate;

Whereas he has contributed immeasurably to the restoration

of the Old Senate Chamber, the Old Supreme Court

Chamber, the President’s Room, and other historic rooms

in the Capitol;

Whereas he has developed exhibitions and educational programs detailing the rich heritage of the Senate for all to

enjoy;
2

•SRES 122 ATS

Whereas he has upheld the high standards and traditions of

the Senate with abiding devotion; and

Whereas he has earned the respect, affection, and esteem of

the United States Senate: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That, effective July 1, 1995, as a token of

2 the appreciation of the Senate for his long and faithful

3 service, James R. Ketchum is hereby designated as Cura4 tor Emeritus of the United States Senate.

Æ