alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                  UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


  Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) June 6, 2002 (June 6, 2002)



                            GLOBALSANTAFE CORPORATION
               (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)



           Cayman Islands                  1-14634            98-0108989
  (State or other jurisdiction of       (Commission        (I.R.S. Employer
   incorporation or organization)       file number)      Identification No.)



   777 N. Eldridge Parkway, Houston, Texas                     77079-4493
   (Address of principal executive offices)                    (Zip Code)



      Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (281) 596-5100



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>

Item 7.  Financial Statements and Exhibits

(c) Exhibits

          99.1    GlobalSantaFe Fleet Status as of June 6, 2002.

Item 9.  Regulation FD Disclosure

Once during the first half of each calendar month and until further notice,
GlobalSantaFe Corporation publishes a list containing information about the
status of each rig in its oil and gas drilling rig fleet. The list includes each
rig's rated water depth (in the case of offshore rigs) or drilling depth (in the
case of land rigs), design, location, and contract status, including information
regarding the dayrate being earned by the rig. Information in the list for June
2002 is as of June 6, 2002. The list is included as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current
Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated herein by reference.

The information furnished pursuant to this Item 9, including Exhibit 99.1, shall
not be deemed to be "filed" for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section.

                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                       GLOBALSANTAFE CORPORATION



Date: June 6, 2002                     By: /s/ Alexander A. Krezel
                                           ---------------------------------
                                           Alexander A. Krezel
                                           Vice President, Associate General
                                           Counsel and Assistant Secretary
<PAGE>

                                Index to Exhibits

Exhibit
Number            Description

  99.1            GlobalSantaFe Fleet Status as of June 6, 2002.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4

                       Consent of Independent Accountants

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Amendment No. 2
to Registration Statement on Form S-4 of our report dated September 7, 2001
relating to the combined financial statements of the Gas Compression Business of
Schlumberger Limited, which appears in the Current Report on Form 8-K/A of
Hanover Compressor Company dated November 9, 2001. We also consent to the
reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Registration Statement.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas
November 25, 2002
Exhibit 32.2



STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Form 10-Q of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, I, Michael Dinkins, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Hilb Rogal &
Hobbs Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(a) such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(b) the
information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company and its
subsidiaries as of and for the periods presented in such Form 10-Q.



|    |  |                              |  |                       
|--- |  | ---------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Michael Dinkins          |  | Date: November 4, 2005
|    |  | Michael Dinkins              |  |                       
|    |  | Executive Vice President and |  |                       
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer      |  |
421 P.2d 902

#### The STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. William Henry BONDS, Appellant.

No. 1 CA-CR 118.

Court of Appeals of Arizona.

Dec. 28, 1966.

Darrell F. Smith, Atty. Gen., by Gary K. Nelson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

George M. Ireland, Prescott, for appellant.

CAMERON, Judge.

This is an appeal from a verdict and judgment of guilty to the crime of grand theft (auto)—13-663 A.R.S.—and a sentence—13-671 A.R.S.—of from two to three years upon such said judgment.

Information was filed 9 August 1966, and on 7 September 1966, a jury returned a verdict of “guilty as charged”. On 14 September 1966, the defendant was adjudged guilty and sentenced to the Arizona State Prison.

Counsel, who represented defendant at the trial, was appointed to represent the defendant on appeal, and, after searching the record, counsel stated that in his opinion all legal rights of the defendant were fully observed and that there were no legal grounds existing for a successful appeal in this matter.

*470Under these circumstances, we must search the entire record for fundamental error. 13-1715 A.R.S., State v. Burrell, 96 Ariz. 233, 393 P.2d 921 (1964), State v. Padilla, 2 Ariz.App. 374, 409 P.2d 90 (1965). ■ '

We have searched the record, read the transcript of the trial below, and are unable to find any reversible error. The sentence of two to three years being within the allowable limits (one to ten years) we find no error in the sentencing.

Judgment affirmed.

STEVENS, C. J., and DONOFRIO, J., concur.
#### Scott JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Karim MEHRABI, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-15736

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017 ***

Filed December 28, 2017

Russell Clive Handy, Esquire, Mark D. Potter, Esquire, Dennis J. Price, II, Esquire, Mr,, Potter Handy LLP, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant

Karim Mehrabi, Pro Se

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for .decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*417MEMORANDUM **

Scott Johnson appeals from the district court’s order denying as moot his motion for attorney’s fees in his action alleging federal and state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. *K.C. ex rel. Erica C. v. Torlakson,*762 F.3d 963, 966 (9th Cir. 2014). We may affirm on any basis supported by the record. *Johnson v. Riverside Healthcare Sys., LP,*534 F.3d 1116, 1121 (9th Cir. 2008). We affirm.

Denial of Johnson’s motion for attorney’s fees was not an abuse of discretion because Johnson failed to set forth any basis for such an award. See *Buckhannon Bd. & Care Home, Inc. v.*W. *Vir. Dep’t of Health & Human Res.,*532 U.S. 598, 600, 604-05, 610, 121 S.Ct. 1835, 149 L.Ed.2d 855 (2001) (discussing motions for attorney’s fees brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act, and explaining that “prevailing party” does not include a party that has failed to secure a judgment on the merits or a court-ordered consent decree); *Doran v. N. State Grocery, Inc.,*137 Cal.App.4th 484, 39 Cal.Rptr.3d 922, 925-27 (2006) (an award for attorney’s fees under Cal. Civ. Code § 52(a) requires a finding of liability).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Emerald Dairy Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended
September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yang Yong Shan, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:  November
16, 2009





By:
              /s/ Yang Yong ShanName:
              Yang
      Yong ShanTitle:
              Chairman,
      Chief Executive Officer and President(Principal
      Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 331 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 331

 Expressing the sense of Congress concerning the inadequacy of sewage 
             infrastructure facilities in Tijuana, Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 1, 1998

 Mr. Bilbray submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
          referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of Congress concerning the inadequacy of sewage 
             infrastructure facilities in Tijuana, Mexico.

Whereas, since the 1930's, United States beaches have been severely impacted by 
        the flow of sewage from Mexico and, in the last 2 decades, this 
        environmental problem has been elevated to a major health and safety 
        concern; and
Whereas, most recently, the flow of sewage from Tijuana, Mexico, has forced 
        beach closures and caused other environmental and economic hardships in 
        the cities of Imperial Beach, Coronado, and San Diego, California, and 
        caused severe degradation of the Tijuana National Estuarian Wildlife 
        Preserve: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) if the Government of Mexico does not take appropriate 
        actions to recognize and mitigate the inadequacy of sewage 
        infrastructure facilities in Mexico (including facilities for 
        the treatment and transport of sewage) and the adverse 
        environmental and economic impacts of sewage from Mexico on 
        cities in the United States, the United States should review 
        its obligations with Mexico under treaties and other 
        international agreements (including agreements relating to port 
        access, loan guarantees, and other types of foreign aid) and 
        take appropriate actions to ensure that the Government of 
        Mexico shares in the burdens caused by its sewage 
        infrastructure problems; and
            (2) any measurement of the responsiveness of the Government 
        of Mexico to requests to mitigate its sewage treatment problems 
        should be based on risk assessment procedures developed in 
        consultation with the San Diego County Health Officer.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 62 (Thursday, March 31, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 18853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06747]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 11695]


Determination Under Section 552(c)(2) of the Foreign Assistance 
Act of 1961 To Provide Commodities and Services for Assistance to 
Ukraine

    Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 552(c)(2) of the 
Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (the ``Act'') (22 U.S.C. 2348a(c)(2)), 
and Presidential Delegation of Authority dated March 16, 2022, I hereby 
determine that, as a result of an unforeseen emergency, the immediate 
provision of assistance under chapter 6 of part II of the FAA in 
amounts in excess of the funds otherwise available for such assistance 
is important to the national interests of the United States.
    I, therefore, pursuant to authority delegated to me by the 
President, direct the drawdown of up to $10 million in commodities and 
services from the inventory and resources of any United States 
government agency to provide assistance to Ukraine under the authority 
of section 552(c)(2) of the Act. The Department of State will 
coordinate implementation of this drawdown.
    This determination shall be reported to the Congress and published 
in the Federal Register.

    Dated: March 16, 2022.
Antony J. Blinken,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2022-06747 Filed 3-30-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P
<PAGE>


================================================================================

                                  United States
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                 --------------

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 --------------

                CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
                       THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

        Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): August 9, 2002



                         ENCOMPASS SERVICES CORPORATION
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



        Texas                       1-13565                    76-0535259
   (State or Other                (Commission               (I.R.S. Employer
     Jurisdiction                 File Number)             Identification No.)
  of Incorporation)


          3 Greenway Plaza, Suite 2000
                 Houston, Texas                                   77046
    (Address of principal executive offices)                    (Zip Code)



       Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (713) 860-0100


================================================================================


<PAGE>


Item 9. Regulation FD Disclosure.

     On August 9, 2002, each of the Principal Executive Officer, Joseph M. Ivey,
and Principal Financial Officer, Darren B. Miller, of Encompass Service
Corporation submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission sworn statements
pursuant to the SEC's Order No. 4-460.

     A copy of each of these statements is attached hereto as an Exhibit (99.1
and 99.2).


<PAGE>



                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.




                                      ENCOMPASS SERVICES CORPORATION

                                      By:      /s/ Gray H. Muzzy
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Gray H. Muzzy
                                         Senior Vice President,
                                         General Counsel and Secretary

Date: August 9, 2002


<PAGE>


Exhibit Index

Exhibit (99.1) Statement Under Oath of Principal Executive Officer dated
               August 9, 2002

Exhibit (99.2) Statement Under Oath of Principal Financial Officer dated
               August 9, 2002
Exhibit 32.2

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, John Stephens, Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, of Biofield
Corp. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-SSB of the Company for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and

(3)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: June 17, 2005                    By: /s/ JOHN D. STEPHENS
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           John D. Stephens
                                           Senior Vice President and Chief
                                           Operating Officer
                                           (Principal Accounting and Financial
                                           Officer)

                                       24
#### Mason White HYDE-EL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Katie POOLE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-7063

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 21, 2017

Decided: December 28, 2017

*204Mason White Hyde-El, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appel-lee.

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mason White Hyde-El seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the l'ec-ommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C, § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); see *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hyde-El has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny his motion for transcripts at Government expense, deny a certificate of ap-pealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 12.1

                             COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF

                          EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES (1)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                    Nine Months Ended                                  Fiscal Year (2)
                               ----------------------------  --------------------------------------------------------------------
                               September 29,  September 30,
                                   2002           2001           2001          2000          1999          1998          1997
                               -------------  -------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
                                                                             (dollars in millions)
<S>                            <C>            <C>            <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Income before income taxes     $      39.987  $      13.705  $     11.696  $      9.835  $      4.986  $     23.246  $     24.270
Minority Interest                      6.195             --            --            --            --            --            --

Fixed Charges
   Interest Expense                   35.471         34.245        44.322        53.346        50.581        39.947        37.479
   Expenses related to
    indebtedness (3)                   0.526          0.625         0.830         0.938         0.836            --            --
   Estimated interest
    portion of                         1.476          2.940         4.129         5.228         4.562         8.703         5.120
    rental expense
   Piedmont fixed charges                 --          5.228         6.668         7.432         6.911         6.837         7.219
                               -------------  -------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------

Total fixed charges                   37.473         43.037        55.949        66.944        62.890        55.487        49.818

Earnings, as defined                  83.655         56.742        67.645        76.779        67.876        78.733        74.088

Ratio of earnings to fixed              2.23           1.32          1.21          1.15          1.08          1.42          1.49
   charges
</TABLE>

(1)  For purposes of computing this ratio, (a) "earnings" consists of income
     from continuing operations before income taxes and minority interest plus
     fixed charges and (b) "fixed charges" consists of interest expensed; the
     amortized premiums, discounts and capitalized expenses related to
     indebtedness; and the estimated interest portion of our rental expense.

(2)  Our fiscal year ends on the Sunday nearest December 31. All years presented
     are 52-week years, except for 1998, which was a 53-week year.

(3)  Consists of the amortized premiums, discounts and capitalized expenses
     related to indebtedness.