alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice
 On March 25, 2022, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed consent decree with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan in the lawsuit entitled 
                    *United States*
                     v. 
                    *Acemco Incorporated, et al.,*
                     Civil Action No. 22-10640. The United States filed a complaint under CERCLA for recovery of its costs spent at the Dearborn Refining Superfund Site in Dearborn, Michigan. The complaint alleges that the 14 named defendants sent waste containing hazardous substances to the Site. Each of the named defendants signed the proposed consent decree. Under the agreement, the named defendants would pay $880,000 for the United States' past costs at the Site and 50% of the United States' future costs, as defined in the consent decree, at the Site. In return, the United States agrees not sue the named defendants to recover past or future response costs under CERCLA Section 107. The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on the consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and should refer to 
                    *United States*
                     v. 
                    *Acemco Incorporated, et al.,*
                     D.J. Ref. No. 90-7-1-704/8. All comments must be submitted no later than thirty (30) days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be submitted either by email or by mail: *To submit comments:*
*Send them to:*By email
*pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov*.By mail
Assistant Attorney General, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611.
 During the public comment period, the consent decree may be examined and downloaded at this Justice Department website: 
                    *https://www.justice.gov/​enrd/​consent-decrees.*
                     We will provide a paper copy of the consent decree upon written request and payment of reproduction costs. Please mail your request and payment to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611. Please enclose a check or money order for $50.25 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury. For a paper copy without the appendices and signature pages, the cost is $5.25. Patricia McKenna, Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division.


[FR Doc. 2022-06781 Filed 3-30-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-15-P
#### UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Donald E. GORDON, Jr. Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-4441

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: December 11, 2017

Filed: December 27, 2017

John Nicholas Koester, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Missouri, Cape Girar-deau, MO, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Amanda Lee Altman, Attorney, McMe-namin Law Firm, LLC, Cape Girardeau, MO, for Defendant-Appellant

Donald E. Gordon, Jr., Pro Se

Before SMITH, Chief Judge, ARNOLD and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Donald Gordon, Jr., pleaded guilty to being a felon possessing a firearm and to possessing a stolen firearm. *See*18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), (j). Gordon had twice been convicted in Missouri state court of “recklessly caus[ing] serious physical injury to another person.” *See*Mo. Rev. Stat. § 565.060.1(3) (now codified at Mo. Rev. Stat. § 565.052.1(3)). When calculating Gordon’s base offense level under the Sentencing Guidelines, the district court determined that Gordon’s prior convictions were crimes of violence. *See*USSG § 2K2.1(a)(2). Gordon appeals, maintaining that his prior convictions were not in fact crimes of violence, and so the district court set his base offense level, and his Guidelines range, too high. While Gordon’s appeal was pending, a panel of our court held that convictions under the statute that Gordon violated were not crimes of violence. *See United States v. Fields,*863 F.3d 1012, 1015 (8th Cir. 2017). Because we are bound by the prior panel’s decision, *see United States v. Eason,*829 F.3d 633, 641 (8th Cir. 2016), we vacate Gordon’s sentence and remand to the district court for resentencing,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM EXCITE,
INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q/A FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          27,460
<SECURITIES>                                    12,852
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,012
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,090)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               127,947
<PP&E>                                          43,629
<DEPRECIATION>                                (17,158)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 200,483
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,464
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        813
<COMMON>                                            52
<OTHER-SE>                                     139,164
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   200,483
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               100,010
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,777
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               108,778
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,205
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 984
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (31,173)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (31,173)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (31,173)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.68)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.68)
<FN>
<F1>IN JUNE 1998, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS DECLARED A TWO-FOR-ONE STOCK SPLIT WHICH
WAS IN THE FORM OF A 100% STOCK DIVIDEND. IN ACCORDANCE WITH REGULATION S-K
ITEM 601, PRIOR PERIOD FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULES HAVE NOT BEEN RESTATED FOR THE
STOCK SPLIT.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                        EX. 99.1

                                 CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of North
American Technologies Group, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2002
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Henry W. Sullivan                                     Dated: August 13, 2002
-------------------------------------
Henry W. Sullivan
President and Chief Executive Officer
PENOBS COT NATION

DEPARTMENT OF

NATURAL RESOURCES

JOHN S BANKS DIRECTOR

Public Notice of Hearing

and

12 yVABANAKI WAY

INDIAN ISLAND ME 04468

TEL 2078277776

FAX 2078177466

Request for Comments

The Penobscot Indian Nation Department of Natural Resources CNN DNR has developed

proposed Surface Water Quality Standards WQS The purpose of the proposed WQS is to

protect maintain and improve the quality of Penobscot Waters for public and private drinking

water supplies to promote the habitation growth and propagation of native and other desirable

aquatic plant and animal life to protect existing and future domestic cultural agricultural

recreational and industrial uses and to protect any other existing and future beneficial uses of

Penobscot Waters including economic uses

The PIN DNR is providing an opportunity for the public to submit written comments on the

proposed WQS The comment period will continue for 60 days from the date of publication of

this notice in the Bangor Daily News that is through August 11 2014

In addition the PIN DNR will hold a public hearing at the following date and location

August 6th 2014

Penobscot Nation Community Building

Indian Island Maine

The public hearing will be held from 6pm to 8 pm to allow members of the public to present

their views orally if desired

You may contact the PIN DNR at 207 8177361 for a copy of the proposed WQS or with any

questions concerning this notice Copies are also available at the PIN DNR office see address

below and on the PIN DNR website at wwwpenobscotnationorgDNRDNR1 Written

comments must be submitted by August 11 2014 by mail email or in person to

Dan Kosnierz Penobscot Water Resources Program Manager

Penobscot Indian Nation Department of Natural Resources

12 Wabanaki Way

Indian Island ME 04468

DanKusnierzpenobscotnationorg

l00 Proeeise41 Chianme 111v

EPA000529
Karen McBrien, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

United States et al., 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

Civil Action No. 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

FILED 

AUG 13 2009 

Clerk Us o· . Sank . . ,strict and 

ruptcy COurts 

09 1527 

The plaintiff has filed an application to proceed in fonna pauperis and a pro se 

complaint. I The Court will grant the application to proceed in fonna pauperis and dismiss the 

complaint. 

The events that fonn the basis of the complaint in this action are, generally speaking, the 

same events that fonned the basis of the action in McBrien v. FBI et ai., Civil Action No. 09-197, 

which was dismissed because the events alleged presented the sort of "fantastic or delusional 

scenarios" that warrant dismissal of an action as frivolous under Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 

319,328 (1989). See Mem. Op., Civil Action No. 09-197 (D.D.C. Feb. 3,2009). This complaint 

I Plaintiff filed the two documents received by the Clerk of Court on August 4 and 

August 6, 2009. Both were entitled "Complaint Plaintiffs Notice of Filing FTCA Claim" 

(hereinafter "notices"), and in both notices the first sentence stated that "Plaintiff Karen McBrien 

intends to" file a complaint under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2674 et seq. 

("FTCA"). Notices at 1 (emphasis added). In addition, on August 6, 2009, the Clerk received a 

third document entitled "Complaint for FTCA Claim for Personal Injury; Damages; Intentional 

Tort; Negligence" (hereinafter "complaint"), which stated that "Plaintiff Karen McBrien files this 

Complaint for personal damages .... " Complaint at 1. Only one application to proceed in 

fonna pauperis was received. All three documents carry identical captions and make reference to 

substantially the same events and impressions. Accordingly, the court construes two of the 

submissions as notices and the other submission as a complaint. 
L 

presents the same fantastic and delusional scenarios of a nationwide conspiracy involving the 

plaintiff s relatives, former relatives, and numerous state and federal agencies who work in 

concert to spy on, control, injure, and trick the plaintiff. This complaint, too, warrants dismissal 

as frivolous. Neitzke, 490 U.S. at 328. Accordingly, on the court's authority under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915( e )(2)(B)(i) (requiring dismissal of frivolous complaints that are filed by plaintiffs 

proceeding informa pauperis), this complaint will be dismissed. 

A separate order accompanies this memorandum 

-- Date: ~ 9'; )..00 1 

- 2 -
EXHIBIT 11
                                                                     ----------


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                               TVC TELECOM INCORPORATED

COMPUTATION OF BASIC WEIGHTED AVERAGE
COMMON STOCK SHARES OUTSTANDING

                                               Total        Three Months      Nine months
                                               Number          Ended             Ended
                                              Of Shares     September 30,    September 30,
                                                                2003             2003
                                            -------------   -------------    -------------

<S>                                           <C>             <C>              <C>
Outstanding shares as of January 1, 2003      148,725,141     148,725,141      148,725,141

Issuance of common shares on 6/30/03            4,000,000       4,000,000        1,348,148

Issuance of common shares on 08/13/03           2,450,000       1,306,666          435,556
                                            -------------   -------------    -------------

Total Weighted Average Shares Outstanding     155,175,141     154,031,807      150,508,845
                                            =============   =============    =============


Net Loss                                                    $    (408,586)   $    (197,699)
                                                            =============    =============
Net Loss per common share                                   $     (0.0027)   $     (0.0013)

</TABLE>
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 169

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 8, 1997

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Thursday, October 9, 1997, it stand adjourned

4 until 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, October 21, 1997, or until

5 noon on the second day after Members are notified to reas-
2

HCON 169

1 semble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution,

2 whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses

3 or adjourns at the close of business on Thursday, October

4 9, 1997, Friday, October 10, 1997, or Saturday, October

5 11, 1997, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority

6 Leader, or his designee, in accordance with this concur7 rent resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon

8 on Monday, October 20, 1997, or such time on that day

9 as may be specified by the Majority Leader or his designee

10 in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the

11 second day after Members are notified to reassemble pur12 suant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever

13 occurs first.

14 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

15 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

16 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead17 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House

18 and Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in their

19 opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Passed the House of Representatives October 8,

1997.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 975

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel JAJO, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 28 (legislative day, JUNE 19), 1995

Mr. CHAFEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

JAJO, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. VESSEL DOCUMENTATION.

4 Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

5 Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 883), section 8 of the Act of

6 June 19, 1886 (24 Stat. 81, chapter 421; 46 U.S.C. App.

7 289), and section 12106 of title 46, United States Code,

8 the Secretary of Transportation may issue a certificate of
2

•S 975 IS

1 documentation with appropriate endorsement for employ2 ment in the coastwise trade for the vessel JAJO, hull iden3 tification number R1Z200207H280, and State of Rhode

4 Island registration number 388133.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,860
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,246
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          97,344
<DEPRECIATION>                                (19,304)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 150,817
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         80,873
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,627
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   150,817
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,480
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,445
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   577
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,862
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,002
<INCOME-TAX>                                       790
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,212
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,182
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          236
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,158
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.8

                             CERTIFICATE OF INCREASE

                                       OF

                     SERIES G-1 CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK

                                       OF

                            HARKEN ENERGY CORPORATION

                       (Pursuant to Section 151(g) of the
                        Delaware General Corporation Law)


     Harken Energy Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under the
Delaware General Corporation Law (the "Corporation") does hereby certify:

     FIRST:  In a Certificate of Designation filed with the Secretary of State
of the State of Delaware on October 19, 2000, pursuant to Section 151 of the
Delaware General Corporation Law, the Corporation was authorized to issue
200,000 shares of Series G-1 Convertible Preferred Stock, as a series of the
Corporation's authorized Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share;

     SECOND: The Board of Directors of the Corporation by resolution adopted on
May 8, 2001, duly authorized and directed that the number of shares of the
Corporation's Series G-1 Convertible Preferred Stock be increased from 200,000
shares to 700,000 shares.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of Increase
to be signed by its duly authorized officer this 18/th/ day of May, 2001.

                                            Harken Energy Corporation


                                            By: /s/ Larry E. Cummings
                                                -------------------------------
                                                    Larry E. Cummings
                                                    Secretary
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

ROBERT MICHAEL MILLE R, Petitioner,

v.

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSU RANCE CORPORATION, Respondent.

______________________

2014

- 3146

______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. SF

- 3330

- 12

- 0711 -I- 1.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________ O R D E R

Robert M. Miller moves without opposition for a 30

- day extension of time, until December 3 , 2014, to file his formal principal brief

. Upon consideration thereof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :

The motion is granted. Case: 14-3146 Document: 13 Page: 1 Filed: 10/30/2014MILLER v. FDIC 2

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Dan iel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s2 7 Case: 14-3146 Document: 13 Page: 2 Filed: 10/30/2014
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lennox BUCKLEY, a/k/a “J”, a/k/a Jamaic, a/k/a Jamaica Man, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-7504

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 22, 2018

Decided: February 27, 2018

Lennox Buckley, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew R. Cogar, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

*329Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lennox Buckley seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Buckley has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*