alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 264

Expressing the sense of the Congress with respect to documentation requirements for physicians who submit claims to Medicare for office visits

and for other evaluation and management services.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 28, 1998

Mr. PALLONE (for himself, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. SANDLIN, Mrs. CUBIN, Mr.

KLECZKA, Mr. WELDON of Pennsylvania, and Mr. ROTHMAN) submitted

the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress with respect to documentation requirements for physicians who submit claims

to Medicare for office visits and for other evaluation

and management services.

Whereas adequate documentation is necessary to assure quality and appropriateness of services;

Whereas effective strategies to eliminate waste, fraud, and

abuse in the Medicare program should not result in excessive documentation requirements being imposed on

physicians that will interfere with patient care;

Whereas if the documentation in the medical record does not

meet program requirements, payments for such claims
2

•HCON 264 IH

may be denied and an investigation into potential fraud

and abuse may result;

Whereas the administrative complexity of the documentation

requirements may increase the risk that physicians will

make inadvertent coding errors; and

Whereas inadvertent errors or legitimate differences of opinion on coding and documentation of physician services

under current law are not grounds for concluding that

fraud has occurred: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 Health Care Financing Administration should—

4 (1) further postpone its plans to implement the

5 documentation guidelines for evaluation and man6 agement services, as currently constituted;

7 (2) continue consultation with organizations

8 representing physicians on how to reduce the com9 plexity of any such guidelines prior to their use by

10 Medicare or its agents in review of claims submitted

11 to the program;

12 (3) conduct a pilot study of any such docu13 mentation requirements prior to use in audits and

14 other review activities; and

15 (4) assure that any such documentation guide16 lines, if applied by Medicare or its agents in review

17 activities, contribute to quality care and do not de18 tract from good patient care by requiring physicians
3

•HCON 264 IH

1 to spend undue time documenting their services—at

2 the expense of spending less time with patients—or

3 lead to sanctions being imposed for unintentional

4 coding and documentation errors.

Æ
#### IN the INTEREST OF: H.B.M.Y., a Minor

727 EDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/06/2017

12 O.C.A. 2016 (Monroe)

Affirmed
EX-10.1


 Exhibit 10.1 

C&J Energy Services, Inc. 

Issuance of Common Stock 

November 30, 2017 
 C&J Energy Services,
Inc. 
 3990 Rogerdale Road 
 Houston, Texas 77049 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 
 This letter is being
delivered to you pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 25, 2017, by and among C&J Energy Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), Caymus Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation, O-Tex Holdings, Inc., a Texas corporation (“O-Tex”), the undersigned, a stockholder of O-Tex, the other stockholders of O-Tex party thereto and Opus Sellers Representative LLC (the “Merger Agreement”). Unless otherwise indicated, capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set
forth in the Merger Agreement, as applicable. 
 Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Company issued
                 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company (“Common Stock”) to the undersigned. The undersigned will not offer, sell,
contract to sell, pledge or otherwise dispose of, (or enter into any transaction which is designed to, or might reasonably be expected to, result in the disposition (whether by actual disposition or effective economic disposition due to cash
settlement or otherwise) by the undersigned or any affiliate of the undersigned or any person in privity with the undersigned or any affiliate of the undersigned), directly or indirectly, including, except for the registration statement provided for
in Section 8.16 of the Merger Agreement, the filing (or participation in the filing) of a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission in respect of, or establish or increase a put equivalent position or liquidate or
decrease a call equivalent position within the meaning of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission promulgated thereunder with respect to, any Common
Stock or any securities convertible into, or exercisable or exchangeable for such Common Stock, or publicly announce an intention to effect any such transaction, for a period from the date hereof until February 28, 2018 without the prior
written consent of the Company (such period, the “O-Tex Lockup Period”). For the avoidance of doubt, in no event shall the Company’s performance of or compliance with its covenants under
Section 8.16 of the Merger Agreement relieve the undersigned of its obligations hereunder, which obligations shall continue in full force and effect until the expiration of the O-Tex Lockup Period. 






 
	
	Yours very truly,
	
	  




  
 Signature Page to Lock
Up Agreement 








			
	ACKNOWLEDGED:
	C&J ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
	
	  

	By:	 	Danielle Hunter
	Title:	 	Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Risk and Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary


  
 Signature Page to Lock
Up Agreement
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 59 (Monday, March 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17290-17291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06607]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION NOTICE OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 87 FR 15242.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: Tuesday, March 22, 
2022 at 10:00 a.m. and its continuation at the conclusion of the open 
meeting on March 24, 2022.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: This meeting also discussed:
    Information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to 
have a considerable adverse effect on the

[[Page 17291]]

implementation of a proposed Commission action.
* * * * *

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.
    Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b.

Vicktoria J. Allen,
Acting Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-06607 Filed 3-24-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 34

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the President should submit a

National Energy Policy Plan to Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 4, 1997

Mr. PICKETT submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Commerce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the President

should submit a National Energy Policy Plan to Congress.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 President should, no later than January 1, 1998, and bi4 ennially thereafter through 2006, submit a National En5 ergy Policy Plan to the Congress, together with proposals

6 for implementing legislation, that will provide for energy

7 self-sufficiency for the United States at the earliest prac8 ticable date.

Æ
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 20, 2020

No. 04-20-00205-CR

Jacob Charles SMITH,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 6596

The Honorable Stephen B. Ables, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

After we granted court reporter Connie Calvert’s first motion for extension of time to file 

the reporter’s records, we set the records due on August 14, 2020. See TEX. R. APP. R. 35.3(c). 

After the extended due date, the court reporter filed a second request for an extension of time to 

file the records until September 14, 2020.

The reporter’s request is GRANTED. The reporter’s records are due on September 14, 

2020. See id. (limiting any extension in an ordinary appeal to thirty days); id. R. 2. 

If the court reporter is unable to file the completed record by September 14, 2020, any 

further request for additional time to file the record must be accompanied by a signed, written 

status report. 

The report must describe the transcript by day with the date, description, page counts, and 

remarks for each day. The page counts must include the total number of pages, the number of 

pages edited, proofread, and formatted into the required electronic form (including bookmarks). 

The report may describe any unusual aspects of the records. The report must describe 

any problems the court reporter reasonably believes may delay the completion of the records

beyond the requested date. 

The preferred form for the status report, with an accompanying example, is attached. 
_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 20th day of August, 2020.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 7679-009]

                    1. On February 24, 2022, Daniel N. Evans, exemptee for the 288-Kilowatt Caroleen Mills Hydroelectric Project No. 7679, filed a letter notifying the Commission that the project was transferred from Daniel N. Evans to James Bocell. The exemption from licensing was originally issued on December 4, 1984.[1]                                          The project is located on the Second Broad River in Rutherford County, North Carolina. The transfer of an exemption does not require Commission approval.                

                    James Bocell is now the exemptee of the Caroleen Mills Hydroelectric Project No. 7679. All correspondence must be forwarded to: Mr. James Bocell, c/o Deal First Inc., 4600 Greenville, Suite 288, Dallas, TX 75206, Phone: 913-424-4576, Email:                     *bo@cgitx.com*.                

      ( print page 18785)    
Dated: March 25, 2022.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                                                     *Clearwater Hydro Company,*                         29 FERC ¶ 62,224 (1984). Subsequently, the project was transferred to                         *Daniel N. Evans,*                         106 FERC ¶ 62,116 (2004).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2022-06806 Filed 3-30-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 11697]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the exhibition “Bernd & Hilla Becher” at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York; at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art, San Francisco, California; and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Stacy E. White,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2022-06856 Filed 3-31-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 17-272V 

Filed: June 14, 2018

UNPUBLISHED

MARY M. HUBBELL, 

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Causation-In-Fact; Influenza (Flu) 

Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to 

Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Kathy Ann Lee, Cline, Farrell, et al., Indianapolis, IN, for petitioner.

Jennifer Leigh Reynaud, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On February 27, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”) following the administration of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on 

October 26, 2015. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit 

of the Office of Special Masters.

On May 21, 2018, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that 

petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. 

Specifically, respondent has determined that petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with 

 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
a SIRVA. Id. at 5. Respondent further agrees that petitioner has satisfied all legal 

prerequisites for compensation under the Vaccine Act. Id.

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

 Chief Special Master
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 1 - 0 1 39 SNPRM **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 1 - CE - 0 21 - AD Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### NO COMMENTS RECEIVED

– If this box is checked, no s ignatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the fol lowing changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because

### Page 2 of 3

**For additional issues, double -**  **click here** 

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.:
**ASE Date** 

**Branch Manager Date**
Executiv e Orde r 1286 6 a n d Congressiona l Revie w Requirement s Rulemakin g Documen t

Title : notc^J^^^--: , L ' }f.-/4^jh//>tf^ry nkhULt - \y/. y f'^/r^ M /^fr^ f /^/»y(g : 

## RiN : Zi o r ' 4 ^ E H Withrespec t

t o th e attache drulemakin g document(s) : 1 . E.0.12866 : Th e requirement s o f sectio n 6(a)(3)(E ) o f

E.O . 1286 6 hav e bee nme t inaccordanc e withth e followin g [initia l appropriat e line] :

Th e rulemakin g document(s ) wa s no t reviewe db y th e Offic e o f Informatio nan d Regulator y Affair s (OIRA) . N o substantiv e change s wer e mad e t o th e document(s ) after it wa s submitte dt o OIRA . Th e require dinformatio ni s attached . 2 . Congresslon M Review : Th e requirements o f th e Smal l Busines s Regulator y Enforcemen t Fairnes s Ac t for th e submissio n o f

final rule s t o Congres s an dGA O ( § 801 ) hav e bee nme t inaccordanc e withth e followin g [initia l appropriat e line] :

Thi s documen t

i s no t afmal rule . Thi s documen t

i s no t arul e unde r

( § 804) . V / Th e documen t

ha s bee n submitte dt o C-5 0 for transmissio nt o Congres s an dGAO . tignatur e 

## OI L Nam e 

## U^-d/^i-^ j UUKC^^

) OM>JS , 

## 0 r

tA-./fO - JL W

## ff/h^^J . Tltie/Otfic e ^ ^ ^ ' 

### ^ } ^IP O 

### 1 0 Dat e
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 326

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol on September 23, 1998,

for the presentation of the Congressional Gold Medal to Nelson Rolihlahla

Mandela.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 14, 1998

Mr. HOUGHTON submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on House Oversight

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol on September 23, 1998, for the presentation of the Congressional

Gold Medal to Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the rotunda of the Capitol is authorized

3 to be used on September 23, 1998, for the presentation

4 of the Congressional Gold Medal to Nelson Rolihlahla

5 Mandela. Physical preparations for the ceremony shall be

6 carried out in accordance with such conditions as the Ar7 chitect of the Capitol may prescribe.

Æ
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 49

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 14, 1997

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),
2

HCON 49 RDS

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SOAP BOX DERBY RACES

2 ON CAPITOL GROUNDS.

3 The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Associa4 tion (hereinafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘As5 sociation’’) shall be permitted to sponsor a public event,

6 soap box derby races, on the Capitol Grounds on July 12,

7 1997, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House

8 of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the

9 Senate may jointly designate.

10 SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

11 The event to be carried out under this resolution shall

12 be free of admission charge to the public and arranged

13 not to interfere with the needs of Congress, under condi14 tions to be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol and

15 the Capitol Police Board; except that the Association shall

16 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities

17 incident to all activities associated with the event.

18 SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

19 For the purposes of this resolution, the Association

20 is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds, subject

21 to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, such stage,

22 sound amplification devices, and other related structures

23 and equipment as may be required for the event to be car24 ried out under this resolution.
3

HCON 49 RDS

1 SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

2 The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police

3 Board are authorized to make any such additional ar4 rangements that may be required to carry out the event

5 under this resolution.

Passed the House of Representatives May 13, 1997.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.