Revised Final 

Fourth Quarter 2012 - Quarterly 

Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Oahu, Hawaii 

DOH Facility ID: 9-102271 

DOH Release ID: 990051, 010011, and 020028 

January 2013 

Department of the Navy 

Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Hawaii 

400 Marshall Road 

JBPHH HI 96860-3139 

Contract Number N62742-12-D-1853, CTO 0002 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank. 
Revised Final 

Fourth Quarter 2012 - Quarterly 

Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Oahu, Hawaii 

DOH Facility ID: 9-102271 

DOH Release ID: 990051, 010011, and 020028 

January 2013 

Prepared for: 

Department of the Navy 

Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Hawaii 

400 Marshall Road 

JBPHH, HI 96860-3139 

Prepared by: 

Environmental Science International, Inc. 

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304 

Kailua, HI 96734 

Prepared under: 

Contract Number N62742-12-D-1853, CTO 0002
This Page Intentionally Left Blank. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM,4Q2012 Status Report Page v January 2013 

REVISED FINAL 

FOURTH QUARTER 2012 - QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT 

INSIDE TUNNEL WELLS 

RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY

Long-Term Groundwater and Soil Vapor Monitoring 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

Joint-Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Oahu, Hawaii 

Prepared for: 

Department of the Navy 

Commanding Officer, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Hawaii 

400 Marshall Road 

JBPHH, HI 96860-3139 

Prepared by: 

Environmental Science International, Inc. 

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304 

Kailua, HI 96734 

(808) 261-0740 

Prepared under: 

Contract Number: N62742-12-D-1853 

Contract Task Order: 0002 

Approval Signature: 

 Darren Uchima, Navy Technical Representative Date 

Approval Signature: 1/17/13 

 Robert Chong, ESI Project Manager Date 

Approval Signature: 1/17/13 

 Traci Sylva, ESI QA Manager Date 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM,4Q2012 Status Report Page vi January 2013 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM,4Q2012 Status Report Page vii January 2013 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Section Title Page

ES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1

 

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1

1.1 Site Description 1-1

1.2 Physical Settings 1-2

1.3 Background 1-3

 

2.0 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING 2-1

2.1 Groundwater Sampling 2-1

2.2 Analytical Results 2-1

2.3 Waste Disposal 2-3

3.0 DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT 3-1

3.1 Data Validation and Assessment 3-1

3.2 Data Assessment and Usability Conclusions 3-3

 

4.0 SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4-1

 

5.0 FUTURE WORK 5-1

 

6.0 REFERENCES 6-1
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM,4Q2012 Status Report Page viii January 2013 

LIST OF TABLES 

Number Title Page

1.1 Current Status of USTs 1-2

2.1 Analytical Results for Groundwater Sampling (October 22 and 23, 2012) 2-5

3.1 Quality Control Results for Groundwater Sampling (October 22 and 23, 

2012) 

3-5

 

 

LIST OF FIGURES 

Number Title 

1 Site Location 

2 Site Map 

 

 

APPENDICES 

Appendix Title 

A Groundwater Sampling Logs 

B Field Notes 

C Laboratory Reports 

D Waste Disposal Manifest 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM,4Q2012 Status Report Page ix January 2013 

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 

ACRONYMS/ 

ABBREVIATIONS DEFINITION/MEANING 

% percent 

bgs below ground surface 

COPC Contaminant of Potential Concern 

DLNR State of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources 

DOH State of Hawaii Department of Health 

DON Department of the Navy 

EAL Environmental Action Level 

EPA Environmental Protection Agency 

ESI Environmental Science International 

F-76 Marine Diesel Fuel 

ID Identification 

JBPHH Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam 

JP-5 Jet Fuel Propellant-5 

JP-8 Jet Fuel Propellant-8 

LCS Laboratory Control Sample 

LCSD Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate 

LOD Limit of Detection 

LOQ Limit of Quantitation 

μg/L micrograms per Liter 

MS Matrix Spike 

MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate 

NAVFAC Naval Facilities Engineering Command 

NAVSUP FLC Naval Supply Systems Command Fleet Logistics Center 

N.D. Not Detected 

PAH Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons 

PARCCS Precision, Accuracy, Representativeness, Completeness, Comparability, 

and Sensitivity 

pH hydrogen activity 

RHSF Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

RPD Relative Percent Difference 

SAP Sampling and Analysis Plan 

TEC The Environmental Company, Inc. 

TPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 

TPH-d Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel 

TPH-g Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline 

U.S. United States of America 

UST Underground Storage Tank 

VOC Volatile Organic Compound 

WP Work Plan 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM,4Q2012 Status Report Page x January 2013 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report ES-1 January 2013

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

This quarterly groundwater monitoring report presents the results of the fourth quarter 2012 

groundwater sampling conducted on October 22 and 23, 2012, at the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage 

Facility [RHSF], Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam [JBPHH], Hawaii. The RHSF is located in 

Halawa Heights on the Island of Oahu. There are 18 active and 2 inactive Underground Storage 

Tanks [USTs] located at the RHSF. The State of Hawaii Department of Health [DOH] Facility 

Identification [ID] number is 9-102271. The DOH Release ID numbers are 990051, 010011, and 

020028. 

The groundwater sampling was conducted as part of the long-term groundwater and soil vapor 

monitoring at the RHSF, under Naval Facilities Engineering Command [NAVFAC] Contract 

Number N62742-12-D-1853. The sampling was conducted in accordance with the approved 

Work Plan [WP]/Sampling and Analysis Plan [SAP] prepared by Environmental Science 

International [ESI]. 

On October 22 and 23, 2012, ESI personnel collected groundwater samples from five 

monitoring wells at the RHSF (wells RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, RHMW05, and 

RHMW2254-01). A summary of the analytical results is provided below. 

 RHMW01 – Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel [TPH-d] (85 micrograms per Liter 

[μg/L]), Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline [TPH-g] (20 μg/L), and dissolved lead 

(0.178 μg/L) were detected. None of the chemical constituents analyzed for were detected 

at concentrations above the DOH Environmental Action Levels [EALs]. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-d (2,200 μg/L), TPH-g (320 μg/L), acenaphthene (0.58 μg/L), fluorene 

(0.29 μg/L), 1-methylnaphthalene (24 μg/L), 2-methylnaphthalene (14 μg/L), naphthalene 

(63 μg/L), ethylbenzene (0.18 μg/L), toluene (0.59 μg/L), and xylenes (0.51 μg/L) were 

detected. TPH-d, TPH-g, 1-methylnaphthalene, and naphthalene were detected at 

concentrations above the DOH EALs for both drinking water toxicity and gross 

contamination. 2-Methylnaphthalene was detected at a concentration above the DOH EAL 

for gross contamination. 

 RHMW03 – TPH-d (45 μg/L), naphthalene (0.029 μg/L), and toluene (0.31 μg/L) were 

detected. None of the chemical constituents analyzed for were detected at concentrations 

above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW05 – TPH-d (17 μg/L), TPH-g (15 μg/L), naphthalene (0.038 μg/L), and toluene (0.54 

μg/L) were detected. None of the chemical constituents analyzed for were detected at 

concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW2254-01 – TPH-g (18 μg/L), naphthalene (0.037 μg/L), toluene (0.71 μg/L), and total 

lead (0.169 μg/L) were detected. None of the chemical constituents analyzed for were 

detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report ES-2 January 2013

Since the wells were last sampled (July 2012), groundwater contaminant concentrations in four 

wells (RHMW01, RHMW03, RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01) remained at low concentrations 

and did not change significantly, or were not detected. TPH-d concentrations detected in the 

sample collected from well RHMW02 are consistent with previous analytical data. 

1-Methylnaphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, and naphthalene concentrations have increased 

since the last sampling event; however, elevated concentrations have been detected in 

groundwater samples collected during past sampling events. TPH-g was detected at 

concentrations above the DOH EAL in RHMW02; however, TPH-g concentrations increased in 

October 2010 and then decreased in subsequent sampling events. 

With the exception of TPH-g, concentrations of Contaminants of Potential Concern [COPCs] 

have not changed significantly. TPH-d, 1-methylnaphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, and 

naphthalene concentrations have been decreasing over the long-term. Historically, TPH-g 

concentrations have increased in the past (e.g., in October 2010) and then decreased in the 

following rounds of sampling. 

Based on the results of the groundwater monitoring, ESI recommends continuing the 

groundwater monitoring program at the RHSF. If TPH-g concentrations in Well RHMW02 

continue to increase, we recommend increasing monitoring frequency to monthly in accordance 

with the RHSF Groundwater Protection Plan. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 1-1 January 2013

SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION 

This quarterly groundwater monitoring report presents the results of the fourth quarter 2012 

groundwater sampling conducted on October 22 and 23, 2012, at the RHSF, JBPHH. The 

RHSF is located in Halawa Heights on the Island of Oahu. The purpose of the sampling is to (1) 

assess the condition of groundwater beneath the RHSF with respect to chemical constituents 

associated with jet fuel propellant and marine diesel fuel, and (2) to ensure the Navy remains in 

compliance with DOH UST release response requirements as described in Hawaii 

Administrative Rules 11-281 Subchapter 7, Release Response Action. The DOH Facility ID 

number for the RHSF is 9-102271. The DOH Release ID numbers are 990051, 010011, and 

020028. 

The groundwater sampling was conducted as part of the long-term groundwater and soil vapor 

monitoring at the RHSF, under NAVFAC Contract Number N62742-12-D-1853. The sampling 

was conducted in accordance with the approved WP/SAP prepared by ESI (ESI, 2012). 

1.1 SITE DESCRIPTION

The RHSF is located on federal government land (zoned F1- Military and Federal), located in 

Halawa Heights, approximately 2.5 miles northeast of Pearl Harbor (Figure 1). It is located on a 

low ridge on the western edge of the Koolau Mountain Range that divides Halawa Valley from 

Moanalua Valley. The RHSF is bordered on the north by Halawa Correctional Facility and 

private businesses, on the west by the United States of America [U.S.] Coast Guard reservation, 

on the south by residential neighborhoods, and on the east by Moanalua Valley. A quarry is 

located less than a quarter mile away to the northwest. The RHSF occupies 144 acres of land 

and the majority of the site is at an elevation of approximately 200 to 500 feet above mean sea 

level. 

The RHSF contains 18 active and 2 inactive USTs that are operated by Naval Supply Systems 

Command Fleet Logistics Center [NAVSUP FLC] Pearl Harbor (formerly Fleet and Industrial 

Supply Center). Each UST has a capacity of approximately 12.5 million gallons. The RHSF is 

located approximately 100 feet above the basal aquifer. The USTs contain Jet Fuel Propellant-5 

[JP-5], Jet Fuel Propellant-8 [JP-8], and Marine Diesel Fuel [F-76]. The current status of the 

USTs are summarized in Table 1.1. 

Five groundwater monitoring wells (wells RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, RHMW05, and 

RHMW2254-01) are located within the RHSF lower access tunnel (Figure 2). Two groundwater 

monitoring wells (wells HDMW2253-03 and OWDFMW01) are located outside of the RHSF 

tunnel system. (Monitoring data for the two wells located outside the tunnel are included in a 

separate report.) 

Monitoring wells RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, and RHMW05 are located inside the 

underground tunnels. Monitoring well RHMW2254-01 is located inside the infiltration gallery of 

the Department of the Navy [DON] Well 2254-01. DON Well 2254-01 is located approximately 

2,400 feet downgradient of the USTs and provides approximately 24 percent [%] of the potable 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 1-2 January 2013

water to the Pearl Harbor System, which serves approximately 52,200 military customers. Naval 

Facilities Engineering Command [NAVFAC] Public Works Department operates the infiltration 

gallery and DON Well 2254-01. 

TABLE 1.1 

Current Status of the USTs 

Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Reporting – Inside Tunnel Wells 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

Tank Identification Fuel Type Status Capacity 

F-1 None Inactive 12.5 million gallons 

F-2 JP-8 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-3 JP-8 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-4 JP-8 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-5 JP-8 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-6 JP-8 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-7 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-8 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-9 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-10 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-11 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-12 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-13 F-76 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-14 F-76 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-15 F-76 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-16 F-76 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-17 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-18 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-19 None Inactive 12.5 million gallons 

F-20 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-76 Marine Diesel Fuel 

JP-5 Jet Fuel Propellant-5 

JP-8 Jet Fuel Propellant-8 

1.2 PHYSICAL SETTING

Climatological conditions in the area of the RHSF consist of warm to moderate temperatures 

and low to moderate rainfall. The RHSF is leeward of the prevailing northeasterly trade winds. 

The average annual precipitation is approximately 40 inches, which occurs mainly between 

November and April (State of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources [DLNR], 

1986). Annual pan evaporation is approximately 75 inches (DLNR, 1985). Average 

temperatures range from the low 60’s to high 80’s (degrees Fahrenheit) (Atlas of Hawaii, 1983). 

Oahu consists of the eroded remnants of two shield volcanoes, Waianae and Koolau. The 

RHSF is located on the southwest flank of the Koolau volcanic shield. Lavas erupted during the 

shield-building phase of the volcano belong to the Koolau Volcanic Series (Stearns and Vaksvik, 

1935). Following formation of the Koolau shield, a long period of volcanic quiescence occurred, 

during which the shield was deeply eroded. Following this erosional period, eruptive activity 

resumed. Lavas and pyroclastic material erupted during this period belong to the Honolulu 

Volcanic Series (Stearns and Vaksvik, 1935). 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 1-3 January 2013

In the immediate area of the RHSF, Koolau Volcanic Series lavas dominate, although there are 

consolidated and unconsolidated non-calcareous deposits in the vicinity that consist of alluvium 

generated during erosion of the Koolau volcanic shield. South-southwest of the RHSF, and in 

isolated exposures to the west, are pyroclastic deposits formed during eruptions from three 

Honolulu Volcanic Series vents, Salt Lake, Aliamanu, and Makalapa (Stearns and Vaksvik, 

1935). Based on established geology and records of the drilled wells (Stearns and Vaksvik, 

1938), the RHSF is underlain by Koolau Volcanic Series basalts. 

The area of the RHSF is classified as Rock Land, where 25-90% of the land surface is covered 

by exposed rock and there are only shallow soils (Foote, et al., 1972). 

Groundwater in Hawaii exists in two principal types of aquifers. The first and most important 

type, in terms of drinking water resources, is the basal aquifer. The basal aquifer exists as a 

lens of fresh water floating on and displacing seawater within the pore spaces, fractures, and 

voids of the basalt that forms the underlying mass of each Hawaiian island. In parts of Oahu, 

groundwater in the basal aquifer is confined by the overlying caprock and is under pressure. 

Waters that flow freely to the surface from wells that tap the basal aquifer are referred to as 

artesian. 

The second type of aquifer is the caprock aquifer, which consists of various kinds of unconfined 

and semi-confined groundwater. Commonly, the caprock consists of a thick sequence of nearly 

impermeable clays, coral, and basalt, which separates the caprock aquifer from the basal 

aquifer. The impermeable nature of these materials and the artesian nature of the basal aquifer 

severely restrict the downward migration of groundwater from the upper caprock aquifer. In the 

area of the RHSF, there is no discernible caprock. 

Shallow groundwater in the area of the RHSF is part of the Waimalu Aquifer System of the Pearl 

Harbor Aquifer Sector. The aquifer is classified as a basal, unconfined, flank-type; and is 

currently used as a drinking water source. The aquifer is considered fresh with less than 250 

milligrams per liter of chloride and is considered an irreplaceable resource with a high 

vulnerability to contamination (Mink and Lau, 1990). 

The nearest drinking water supply well is DON Well 2254-01, located in the infiltration gallery 

within the RHSF. DON Well 2254-01 is located approximately 2,400 feet downgradient of the 

USTs (Figure 2). 

1.3 BACKGROUND

The RHSF was constructed by the U.S. Government in the early 1940s. Twenty USTs and a 

series of tunnels were constructed. The USTs were constructed of steel and they currently 

contain JP-5, JP-8, and F-76. Several tanks in the past have stored DON special fuel oil, DON 

distillate, aviation gasoline, and motor gasoline (Environet, 2010). The fueling system is a selfcontained underground unit that was installed into native rock comprised primarily of basalt with 

some interbedded tuffs and breccias (Environet, 2010). Each UST measures approximately 245 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 1-4 January 2013

feet in height and 100 feet in diameter. The upper domes of the tanks lie at a depth varying 

between 100 feet and 200 feet below ground surface [bgs]. 

In 1998, Earth Tech conducted a Phase II remedial investigation/feasibility study for the Oily 

Waste Disposal Facility located within the RHSF. The study involved installing well 

OWDFMW01 (which was originally MW08) (Earth Tech, 1999). 

In February 2001, the DON installed groundwater monitoring well RHMW01 to monitor for 

contamination in the basal aquifer beneath the RHSF. Well RHMW01 was installed 

approximately 100 feet below grade within the lower access tunnel. The depth to water was 

measured at 86 feet below grade at the time of the well completion. In February 2001, a 

groundwater sample was collected from the well. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons [TPH] and lead 

were detected in the samples. Lead was detected at a concentration above the DOH EAL (The 

Environmental Company, Inc. [TEC], 2009; DOH, 2000). 

In 2005, the RHSF groundwater monitoring program was initiated. It involved routine 

groundwater sampling of wells RHMW01 and RHMW2254-01. Samples were collected in 

February, June, September, and December of 2005. Lead was detected at concentrations 

above the DOH EAL in samples collected in February and June. The samples collected in 

February and June were not filtered prior to analysis, whereas the samples collected in 

September and December were filtered prior to analysis. Since the samples collected in 

February and June were not filtered prior to analysis, the lead results were not considered 

appropriate for a risk assessment (TEC, 2008). 

Between June and September 2005, TEC installed three groundwater monitoring wells (wells 

RHMW02, RHMW03, and RHMW04) within the RHSF (TEC, 2008). Well RHMW04 was 

installed upgradient of the USTs to provide background geochemistry information for water 

moving through the basal aquifer beneath the RHSF. Wells RHMW02 and RHMW03 were 

installed approximately 125 feet below grade within the RHSF lower tunnel and well RHMW04 

was installed to a depth of approximately 300 feet bgs outside of the RHSF tunnels. In 

September 2005, groundwater samples were collected from the three newly installed 

groundwater monitoring wells (wells RHMW02, RHMW03, and RHMW04) along with the two 

existing wells (wells RHMW01 and RHMW2254-01). The COPCs with concentrations exceeding 

DOH EALs are summarized below. 

 RHMW01 – TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-g, TPH-d, naphthalene, trichloroethylene, 1-methylnaphthalene, and 

2-methylnaphthalene were detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW03 – TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL. 

In 2006, TEC installed dedicated sampling pumps in the five wells (wells RHWM01, RHWM02, 

RHMW03, RHWM04,and RHMW2254-01). In July and December of 2006, groundwater 

samples were collected from the five wells. The COPCs with concentrations exceeding DOH 

EALs are summarized below. 

 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 1-5 January 2013

 RHMW01 – TPH-d and naphthalene were detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-g, TPH-d, and naphthalene were detected at concentrations above the 

DOH EALs. 

 RHMW03 – TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL. 

In 2007, groundwater samples were collected from the four wells RHWM01, RHWM02, 

RHMW03, and RHMW2254-01. Samples were collected in March, June, and September of 

2007. The COPCs with concentrations exceeding DOH EALs are summarized below. 

 RHMW01 – TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-g, TPH-d, naphthalene, 1-methylnaphthalene, and 2-methylnaphthalene 

were detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW03 – TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL. 

In 2008, groundwater samples were collected from wells RHWM01, RHWM02, RHMW03, and 

RHMW2254-01. Samples were collected in January, April, July, and October of 2008. The 

COPCs with concentrations exceeding DOH EALs are summarized below. In addition, a 

groundwater protection plan (TEC, 2008) was prepared. 

 RHMW01 – TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-d, naphthalene, 1-methylnaphthalene, and 2-methylnaphthalene were 

detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW03 – TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL. 

In April 2009, groundwater monitoring well RHMW05 was installed downgradient of the USTs, 

within the lower access tunnel between RHMW01 and RHMW2254-01. It was installed to 

identify the extent of contamination downgradient of the USTs. Well RHMW05 was added to the 

quarterly groundwater sampling program. In 2009, quarterly groundwater samples were collect 

from wells RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01. Samples were 

collected in February, May, July, and October of 2009. The COPCs with concentrations 

exceeding DOH EALs are summarized below. 

 RHMW01 – TPH-d and 1-methylnaphthalene were detected at concentrations above the 

DOH EAL. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-d, naphthalene, 1-methylnaphthalene, and 2-methylnaphthalene were 

detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW03 – TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the DOH EAL. 

 RHMW05 – TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the DOH EAL. 

In 2010, groundwater samples were collected from wells RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, 

RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01. Samples were collected in January, April, July, and October. 

The COPCs with concentrations exceeding DOH EALs are summarized below. 

 RHMW01 – TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-g, TPH-d, naphthalene, and 1-methylnaphthalene were detected at 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 1-6 January 2013

concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW03 – TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the DOH EAL. 

 RHMW05 – TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the DOH EAL. 

In 2011, quarterly groundwater samples were collected from wells RHMW01, RHMW02, 

RHMW03, RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01. Samples were collected in January, April, July, and 

October. The COPCs with concentrations exceeding DOH EALs are summarized below. 

 RHMW01 – TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-d, naphthalene, ideno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene, and 1-methylnaphthalene were 

detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

In 2012, quarterly groundwater samples were collected from wells RHMW01, RHMW02, 

RHMW03, RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01. Samples were collected in February, April, and July. 

The COPCs with concentrations exceeding DOH EALs are summarized below. 

 RHMW01 – TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-d, naphthalene, and 1-methylnaphthalene were detected at concentrations 

above the DOH EALs. 

1.3.1 Previous Reports 

The following groundwater monitoring reports were previously submitted to the DOH: 

1. Groundwater Sampling Report, First Quarter 2005 (submitted April 2005). 

2. Groundwater Sampling Report, Second Quarter 2005 (submitted August 2005). 

3. Groundwater Sampling Report, Third Quarter 2005 (submitted November 2005). 

4. Groundwater Sampling Report, Fourth Quarter 2005 (submitted February 2006). 

5. Groundwater Monitoring Results, July 2006 (submitted September 2006). 

6. Groundwater Monitoring Results, December 2006 (submitted January 2007). 

7. Groundwater Monitoring Results, March 2007 (submitted May 2007). 

8. Groundwater Monitoring Results, June 2007 (submitted August 2007). 

9. Groundwater Monitoring Results, September 2007 (submitted October 2007). 

10. Groundwater Monitoring Report, January 2008 (submitted March 2008). 

11. Groundwater Monitoring Report, April 2008 (submitted May 2008). 

12. Groundwater Monitoring Report, July 2008 (submitted October 2008). 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 1-7 January 2013

13. Groundwater Monitoring Report, October and December 2008 (submitted February 2009). 

14. Groundwater Monitoring Report, February 2009 (submitted May 2009). 

15. Groundwater Monitoring Report, May 2009 (submitted July 2009). 

16. Groundwater Monitoring Report, July 2009 (submitted September 2009). 

17. Groundwater Monitoring Report, October 2009 (submitted December 2009). 

18. Groundwater Monitoring Report, January, February, and March 2010 (submitted April 2010). 

19. Groundwater Monitoring Report, April 2010 (submitted May 2010). 

20. Groundwater Monitoring Report, July 2010 (submitted August 2010). 

21. Groundwater Monitoring Report, October 2010 (submitted December 2010). 

22. Groundwater Monitoring Report, January 2011 (submitted March 2011). 

23. Groundwater Monitoring Report, April 2011 (submitted June 2011). 

24. Groundwater Monitoring Report, July 2011 (submitted September 2011). 

25. Groundwater Monitoring Report, October 2011 (submitted December 2011). 

26. Groundwater Monitoring Report, January-February 2012 (submitted March 2012). 

27. Groundwater Monitoring Report, April 2012 (Submitted July 2012). 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 1-8 January 2013

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 2-1 January 2013

SECTION 2 – GROUNDWATER SAMPLING 

On October 22 and 23, 2012, ESI personnel collected groundwater samples from five 

monitoring wells at the RHSF (wells RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, RHMW05, and 

RHMW2254-01). The samples were collected in accordance with DOH UST release response 

requirements (DOH, 2000) and the RHSF Groundwater Protection Plan (TEC, 2008). Prior to 

purging and sampling, the depth to groundwater and the depth to the bottoms of the wells were 

measured using a Solinst 122 oil/water interface probe. No measurable product was detected in 

any of the wells. 

2.1 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING

Prior to collecting groundwater samples, the monitoring wells were purged of water in the well 

casings. Each well contains a dedicated bladder pump which was used to purge the well and to 

collect samples. To operate the pump, a portable air compressor with an in-line filter was 

connected to a QED MP50 MicroPurge Basics Controller box, which was then connected to the 

pump. The compressor was turned on to power the pump and the controller was used to adjust 

the pumping rate to less than one liter of water per minute. 

Water quality parameters were monitored on a periodic basis during well purging. The water 

quality parameters that were measured included hydrogen activity [pH], temperature, 

conductivity, dissolved oxygen, and oxidation reduction potential. The water quality parameters 

were evaluated to assess whether the natural characteristics of the aquifer formation water were 

present within the monitoring wells before collecting the samples. At least four readings were 

collected during the purging process. Purging was considered complete when at least three 

consecutive water quality measurements stabilized within approximately 10%. The readings 

were recorded on groundwater monitoring logs. The groundwater monitoring logs are included 

in Appendix A. In addition, field notes were taken to document the sampling event. The field 

notes are included in Appendix B. 

When the water quality parameters stabilized, groundwater samples were collected from the 

wells using the bladder pumps. The groundwater samples were collected no more than two 

hours after purging was completed to decrease groundwater interaction with the monitoring well 

casing and atmosphere. Prior to collecting the sample, the water level in the monitoring wells 

was measured and recorded to ensure that water was not drawn down. The groundwater 

samples were collected at a flow rate of approximately 0.1 to 0.5 liters per minute. Samples 

collected for dissolved lead analysis were filtered in the field using 0.45 micron filters. 

2.2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS

The samples were analyzed for TPH-d using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA] 

Method 8015M, TPH-g and Volatile Organic Compounds [VOCs] using EPA Method 8260B, 

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons [PAH] using EPA Method 8270C SIM, and dissolved lead 

using EPA Method 6020. An additional sample was collected from well RHMW2254-01 and 

analyzed for total lead (unfiltered) as DON Well 2254-01 is a drinking water supply well. The 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 2-2 January 2013

analytical results are summarized below and in Table 2.1. A copy of the laboratory report is 

included in Appendix C. 

 RHMW01 – TPH-d (85 μg/]), TPH-g (20 μg/L), and dissolved lead (0.178 μg/L) were 

detected. None of the chemical constituents analyzed for were detected at concentrations 

above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-d (2,200 μg/L), TPH-g (320 μg/L), acenaphthene (0.58 μg/L), fluorene 

(0.29 μg/L), 1-methylnaphthalene (24 μg/L), 2-methylnaphthalene (14 μg/L), naphthalene 

(63 μg/L), ethylbenzene (0.18 μg/L), toluene (0.59 μg/L), and xylenes (0.51 μg/L) were 

detected. TPH-d, TPH-g, 1-methylnaphthalene, and naphthalene were detected at 

concentrations above the DOH EALs for both drinking water toxicity and gross 

contamination. 2-Methylnaphthalene was detected at a concentration above the DOH EAL 

for gross contamination. 

 RHMW03 – TPH-d (45 μg/L), naphthalene (0.029 μg/L), and toluene (0.31 μg/L) were 

detected. None of the chemical constituents analyzed for were detected at concentrations 

above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW05 – TPH-d (17 μg/L), TPH-g (15 μg/L), naphthalene (0.038 μg/L), and toluene (0.54 

μg/L) were detected. None of the chemical constituents analyzed for were detected at 

concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW2254-01 – TPH-g (18 μg/L), naphthalene (0.037 μg/L), toluene (0.71 μg/L), and total 

lead (0.169 μg/L) were detected. None of the chemical constituents analyzed for were 

detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

2.2.1 Groundwater Contaminant Trends 

 RHMW01 – The COPCs detected during this round of quarterly sampling were consistent 

with historical data. TPH-d has historically been detected at concentrations above the DOH 

EAL. TPH-d concentrations have decreased from 2,500 μg/L in September 2005 to 85 μg/L 

in October 2012. 

 RHMW02 – COPCs detected during this round of quarterly sampling were consistent with 

historical data. TPH-d, TPH-g, 1-methylnaphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, and naphthalene 

have historically been detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. TPH-d 

concentrations show a decreasing trend from a high of 6,000 μg/L in October 2008 to 

concentrations ranging from 1,800-2,200 μg/L during the last several rounds of sampling. 

1-Methylnaphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, and naphthalene show a decreasing trend over 

the long-term. 1-Methylnaphthalene concentrations have decreased from between 102-104 

μg/L in 2005 to between 4.7-24 μg/L during the last few rounds of sampling. 2-

Methylnaphthalene concentrations have decreased from between 87.2-88.5 μg/L in 2005 to 

between 12-14 μg/L during this round of sampling. Note, however that 1-methylnaphthalene, 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 2-3 January 2013

2-methylnaphthalene, and naphthalene have increased since the last sampling event. 

Elevated concentrations of these COPCs have been detected during past sampling events. 

TPH-g concentrations show a slight increasing trend with a substantial increase from nondetect during the last round of sampling to 360 μg/L during this round of sampling. 

 RHMW03 – COPCs detected during this round of quarterly sampling were consistent with 

historical data. TPH-d has historically been detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL; 

however it has not been detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL since October 

2010. 

 RHMW05 – COPCs detected during this round of quarterly sampling were consistent with 

historical data. TPH-d has historically been detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL; 

however it has not been detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL since January 

2010. 

 RHMW2254-01 – COPCs detected during this round of quarterly sampling were consistent 

with historical data. None of the COPCs have been detected at concentrations above the 

DOH EALs. 

2.3 WASTE DISPOSAL

The purged groundwater and decontamination water generated during sampling of the inside 

tunnel wells was stored in a 55-gallon drum along with the purged water and decontamination 

water from the outside tunnel wells. The water was disposed of following receipt of the analytical 

results for the outside tunnel wells. The drum was stored onsite at Adit 3. On December 10, 

2012, the drum of water was picked up by Pacific Commercial Services, LLC, and disposed of 

at Unitek Solvent Services, Inc. The waste disposal manifest is included in Appendix D. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 2-4 January 2013

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 2-5 

TABLE 2.1 

Analytical Results for Groundwater Sampling (October 22 and 23, 2012) 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

October 2012 Quarterly Status Report

Chemical 

Constituent 

RHMW01 

(ES001) 

RHMW02

(ES002) 

RHMW02

(ES003) 

(Dup) 

RHMW03

(ES004) 

RHMW05 

(ES005) 

RHMW2254-01

(ES006) LOD

Drin

Wa

Tox

TPH-d 85 2,200 1,800 45 17 N.D. 20 1TPH-g 20 320 360 N.D. 15 18 30 1Acenaphthene N.D. 0.58 0.59 N.D. N.D. N.D. 0.05 3Fluorene N.D. 0.29 0.3 N.D. N.D. N.D. 0.05 21-Methylnaphthalene N.D. 24 21 N.D. N.D. N.D. 0.05 42-Methylnaphthalene N.D. 14 12 N.D. N.D. N.D. 0.05 2Naphthalene N.D. 63 61 0.029 0.038 0.037 0.05 1Ethylbenzene N.D. 0.18 0.18 N.D. N.D. N.D. 0.5 7Toluene N.D. 0.59 0.6 0.54 0.31 0.71 0.5 1,0Xylenes N.D. 0.51 0.47 N.D. N.D. N.D. 1.0 10,Dissolved Lead 0.178 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. 0.2 1Total Lead - - - - - 0.169 0.2 1

The data are in micrograms per liter (μg/L). Shaded values exceeded the DOH EALs. - Not AnalyzedDOH EALs DOH Tier 1 Environmental Action Levels for groundwater where groundwater is a current drinking water source and surface wa

meters from the site (DOH, Fall 2011). 

LOD Limit of Detection

N.D. Not Detected TPH-d Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel

TPH-g Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 2-6 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 3-1 January 2013

SECTION 3 – DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT 

A data quality assessment, which consists of a review of the overall groundwater sample 

collection and analysis process, was performed in order to determine whether the analytical 

data generated meets the quality objectives for the project. The data quality assessment was 

performed in accordance with the approved WP/SAP prepared by ESI (ESI, 2012). The field 

quality control program consisted of standardized sample collection and management 

procedures, and the collection of field duplicate samples, matrix spike samples, and trip blank 

samples. The laboratory quality assurance program consisted of the use of standard analytical 

methods and the preparation and analyses of Matrix Spike [MS]/Matrix Spike Duplicate [MSD] 

samples, surrogate spikes, method blanks, and Laboratory Control Samples [LCSs]. 

3.1 Data Validation and Assessment 

The objective of data validation is to provide data of known quality for project decisions. Data 

quality is judged in terms of its Precision, Accuracy, Representativeness, Completeness, 

Comparability, and Sensitivity [PARCCS]. A number of factors may affect the quality of data, 

including: sample collection methods, sample analysis methods, and adherence to established 

procedures for sample collection, preservation, management, shipment, and analysis. 

Precision 

Precision is defined as the reproducibility of replicate measurements. Precision is evaluated by 

Relative Percentage Difference [RPD] of field duplicates and laboratory LCS/Laboratory Control 

Sample Duplicates [LCSDs] or MS/MSD results. Field duplicate and MS/MSD samples were 

collected at a rate of approximately 10% of project samples. Field duplicates were sent to the 

laboratory along with the primary samples. 

For this monitoring event, several RPDs for MS/MSD and LCS/LCSD pairs were above 

precision criteria; however, since all results for these analytes in primary samples were not 

detected, these exceedances are not considered to have an impact on project decisions. The 

RPDs of primary and field duplicate samples are provided in Table 3.1. All RPDs are less than 

20% (below 50% as recommended in the NAVFAC Project Procedures Manual (DON 2007), 

and therefore, the data precision is considered acceptable. 

Accuracy 

Accuracy is defined as the degree of agreement of a measurement to an accepted reference or 

true value. Accuracy is evaluated through measurement of the percent recovery of an analyte in 

a reference standard or spiked sample. Accuracy limits for surrogates, laboratory control spike, 

MS, and MSD samples are established by the individual laboratory. 

All of the LCS and surrogate spike recoveries for analyzed constituents were within acceptable 

percent recovery limits. The analyte concentrations (naphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene and 1-

methylnaphthalene) for ES002, the primary sample on which the MS and MSD were performed, 

were significantly higher than the added spike concentration which prevented an accurate 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 3-2 January 2013

evaluation of the MS/MSD recovery. All other MS and MSD recoveries were within acceptable 

recovery limits, therefore, the data accuracy for this monitoring event is considered acceptable. 

Representativeness 

Representativeness is the degree that data accurately and precisely represents a characteristic 

of a population, parameter variations at a sampling point, or an environmental condition. 

Representativeness was achieved by conducting sampling in compliance with the sample 

collection procedures described in the WP/SAP (ESI, 2012). 

Representativeness is also evaluated via compliance with established sample holding time and 

sample preservation, and through the analysis of blank samples, including method blank and 

trip blank samples. The sample holding time and sample preservation complied with the EPA 

criteria. For this sampling event, one trip blank was collected, and TPH-g was not detected. 

TPH-g was detected in the method blank below the Limit of Detection [LOD]. Therefore, the 

groundwater sample data are considered representative of the groundwater quality on site. 

Completeness 

Completeness is defined as the overall percentage of valid analytical results (including 

estimated results) compared to the total number of analytical results reported by the analytical 

laboratory. No data were rejected for this project, and therefore the completeness goal for this 

project (90%), was successfully met. Successful completion of data acquisition can only be 

accomplished if both the field and laboratory portions of the project are performed according to 

the procedures described in the WP/SAP (ESI, 2012). 

Comparability 

Comparability expresses the confidence with which one data set can be compared to another 

data set. Comparability can be related to accuracy and precision because these quantities are 

measures of data reliability. Data, with acceptable precision and accuracy, are considered 

comparable if collection techniques, analytical procedures, methods and reporting are 

equivalent. For this monitoring event, the samples were collected using approaches consistent 

with those in the previous events, and the same analytical methods/procedures were used to 

measure the concentration of COPCs. Therefore, the results are considered comparable within 

this data set and with the data collected from previous sampling events. 

Sensitivity 

The Limits Of Quantitation [LOQs] are established by the laboratory based on the LODs or 

instrument detection limits, historical laboratory data, and EPA limits established for the 

methods. The LOQs for samples may require adjustment due to matrix interference or if high 

levels of target analytes necessitate dilution before analysis. Matrix interference and sample 

dilutions have the effect of increasing the LOQs. Laboratory LODs and LOQs for several 

analytes differed from the LODs and LOQs in the WP/SAP because the laboratory updates 

them quarterly. LODs and LOQs for several analytes were greater than the DOH EALs (as 

stated in the WP/SAP) and therefore it is not possible to determine whether the analytes are 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 3-3 January 2013

present at concentrations greater than the DOH EAL. As suggested by the DOH, the project 

action level will be the LOD for these analytes. 

3.2 Data Assessment and Usability Conclusions 

The PARCCS criteria were evaluated, and with a few exceptions, all criteria were met. These 

exceptions include the exceedances of recovery criteria for MS/MSDs for the three PAHs 

(naphthalene, 1–methylnaphthalene, and 2–methylnaphthalene) due to significantly higher 

concentrations in the parent sample (which exceeded project action levels) when compared to 

the spiked concentration, and prevents the accurate evaluation of MS/MSD recovery. Since the 

surrogate recoveries and the recoveries of these three PAH in the LCS/LCSD are all within 

recovery criteria, the accuracy is considered acceptable, and the exceedance is attributed to the 

high parent sample concentrations. The precision criteria exceedances (LCS/LCSD and 

MS/MSD) are also not considered to affect the usability of the data for project decisions, since 

no detects occurred for the analytes for which these exceedances occurred. Therefore, the data 

assessment concludes that all data generated during this event are usable for the intended use 

for project decisions. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 3-4 January 2013

This Page Intentionally Left Blank. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 3-5 

TABLE 3.1 

Quality Control Results for Groundwater Sampling (October 22 and 23, 20

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

October 2012 Quarterly Status Report 

Method Chemical Constituent 

DOH EALs RHMW02 (ES002) RHM

Drinking 

Water 

Toxicity 

Gross 

Contamination Result Q LOQ LOD DL Result Q 

EPA 8015B TPH-d 190 100 2,200 HD 50 20 15 1,800 HD EPA 8015B TPH-g - - - - - - - - - EPA 8260B TPH-g 100 100 320 B 50 30 13 360 B 

EPA 8270C SIM (PAH) 

Acenaphthene 370 20 0.58 U 0.2 0.05 0.018 0.59 U 

Acenaphthylene 240 2,000 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.021 N.D. U 

Anthracene 1,800 22 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.034 N.D. U 

Benzo[a]anthracene 0.092 4.7 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.024 N.D. U 

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 1,500 0.13 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.022 N.D. U 

Benzo[a]pyrene 0.2 0.81 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.036 N.D. U 

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.092 0.75 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.025 N.D. U 

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.92 0.4 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.023 N.D. U 

Chrysene 9.2 1 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.019 N.D. U 

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 0.0092 0.52 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.027 N.D. U 

Fluoranthene 1,500 130 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.027 N.D. U 

Fluorene 240 950 0.29 0.2 0.05 0.024 0.3 

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.092 0.095 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.022 N.D.. U 

1-Methylnaphthalene 4.7 10 24 2 0.5 0.26 21 2-Methylnaphthalene 24 10 14 2 0.5 0.28 12 

Naphthalene 17 21 63 2 0.5 0.23 61 

Phenanthrene 240 410 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.031 N.D. U 

Pyrene 180 68 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.025 N.D. U 

EPA 8260B (VOC) 

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 200 970 N.D. U 5 0.5 0.3 N.D. U 

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5 50,000 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.38 N.D. U 

1,1-Dichloroethane 2.4 50,000 N.D. U 5 0.5 0.28 N.D. U 

1,1-Dichloroethylene 7 1,500 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.431 N.D. U 

1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.6 50,000 N.D. U 5 1 0.64 N.D. U 

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 70 3,000 N.D. U 5 1 0.5 N.D. U 

1,2-Dibromo-3- 

chloropropane 0.04 10 N.D. U 10 5 1.2 N.D. U 

1,2-Dibromoethane 0.04 50,000 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.36 N.D. U 

1,2-Dichlorobenzene 600 10 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.46 N.D. U 

1,2-Dichloroethane 0.15 7,000 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.24 N.D. U 

1,2-Dichloropropane 5 10 N.D. U 5 0.5 0.42 N.D. U 

1,3-Dichlorobenzene 180 5 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.4 N.D. U 

1,3-Dichloropropene (total of 

cis/trans) 0.43 50,000 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.25 N.D. U 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 3-6 

TABLE 3.1 (continue) 

Quality Control Results for Groundwater Sampling (October 22 and 23, 20

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

October 2012 Quarterly Status Report 

Method Chemical Constituent 

DOH EALs RHMW02 (ES002) RHM

Drinking 

Water 

Toxicity 

Gross 

Contamination Result Q LOQ LOD DL Result Q 

EPA 8260B (VOC) 

1,4-Dichlorobenzene 75 5 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.43 N.D. U 

Acetone 22,000 20,000 N.D. U 20 10 6 N.D. U 

Benzene 5 170 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.14 N.D. U 

Bromodichloromethane 0.12 50,000 N.D. U 5 0.5 0.21 N.D. U 

Bromoform 80 510 N.D. U 10 1 0.5 N.D. U 

Bromomethane 8.7 50,000 N.D. U 20 5 3.9 N.D. U 

Carbon Tetrachloride 5 520 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.23 N.D. U 

Chlorobenzene 100 50 N.D. U 5 0.5 0.17 N.D. U 

Chloroethane 21,000 16 N.D. U 10 5 2.3 N.D. U 

Chloroform 70 2,400 N.D. U 5 0.5 0.46 N.D. U 

Chloromethane 1.8 50,000 N.D. IH,U 10 5 1.8 N.D. U 

cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 70 50,000 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.476 N.D. U 

Dibromochloromethane 0.16 50,000 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.25 N.D. U 

Ethylbenzene 700 30 0.18 J 1 0.5 0.14 0.18 J 

Hexachlorobutadiene 0.86 6 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.32 N.D. U 

Methyl ethyl ketone (2-

Butanone) 7,100 8,400 N.D. U 10 5.0 2.21 N.D. U 

Methyl isobutyl ketone (4-

Methyl-2-Pentanone) 2,000 1300 N.D. U 10 5.0 4.4 N.D. U 

Methyl tert-butyl Ether 12 5 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.31 N.D. U 

Methylene chloride 4.8 9,100 N.D. U 5 1.0 0.64 N.D. U 

Styrene 100 10 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.17 N.D. U 

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.52 50,000 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.4 N.D. U 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.067 500 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.41 N.D. U 

Tetrachloroethylene 5 170 N.D. U 5 0.5 0.387 N.D. U 

Toluene 1,000 40 0.59 J 1 0.5 0.24 0.6 J 

trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 100 260 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.368 N.D. U 

Trichloroethylene 5 310 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.368 N.D. U 

Vinyl chloride 2 3,400 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.3 N.D. U 

Xylenes 10,000 20 0.51 J 10 1 0.23 0.47 J 

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 200 970 N.D. U 5 0.5 0.3 N.D. U 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 3-7 

TABLE 3.1 (continue) 

Quality Control Results for Groundwater Sampling (October 22 and 23, 20

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

October 2012 Quarterly Status Report 

Method Chemical Constituent 

DOH EALs RHMW02 (ES002) RHM

Drinking 

Water 

Toxicity 

Gross 

Contamination Result Q LOQ LOD DL Result Q 

EPA 6020 Lead 15 50,000 N.D. U 1 0.2 0.0898 N.D. U 

The data are in micrograms per Liter (μg/L). Shaded values exceeded the DOH EALs. - Not Analyzed % percent B Analyte was present in the associated method blank. DL Detection Limit DOH EALs DOH Tier 1 Environmental Action Levels for groundwater where groundwater is a current drinking water source and surface water is greater than 1

HD The chromatographic pattern was inconsistent with the profile of the reference fuel standard. IH Calibration verified recovery below method confidence limit for this analyte. J Analyte was detected at a concentration below the LOQ and above the DL. Reported value is estimated. LOD Limit of Detection LOQ Limit of Quantitation N.D. Not Detected Q Qualifier RPD Relative Percent Difference TPH-d Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel TPH-g Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline U Undetected at DL and is reported as less than the LOD. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 3-8 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 4-1 January 2013

SECTION 4 – SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

On October 22 and 23, 2012, ESI personnel collected groundwater samples from five 

monitoring wells at the RHSF (wells RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, RHMW05, and 

RHMW2254-01). 

The groundwater sampling was conducted as part of the long-term groundwater and soil vapor 

monitoring at the RHSF, under Naval Facilities Engineering Command [NAVFAC] Contract 

Number N62742-12-D-1853. The sampling was conducted in accordance with the approved 

WP/SAP prepared by ESI. A summary of the analytical results is provided below. 

 RHMW01 – TPH-d (85 μg/L), TPH-g (20 μg/L), and dissolved lead (0.178 μg/L) were 

detected. None of the chemical constituents analyzed for were detected at concentrations 

above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-d (2,200 μg/L), TPH-g (320 μg/L), acenaphthene (0.58 μg/L), fluorene 

(0.29 μg/L), 1-methylnaphthalene (24 μg/L), 2-methylnaphthalene (14 μg/L), naphthalene 

(63 μg/L), ethylbenzene (0.18 μg/L), toluene (0.59 μg/L), and xylenes (0.51 μg/L) were 

detected. TPH-d, TPH-g, 1-methylnaphthalene, and naphthalene were detected at 

concentrations above the DOH EALs for both drinking water toxicity and gross 

contamination. 2-Methylnaphthalene was detected at a concentration above the DOH EAL 

for gross contamination. 

 RHMW03 – TPH-d (45 μg/L), naphthalene (0.029 μg/L), and toluene (0.54 μg/L) were 

detected. None of the chemical constituents analyzed for were detected at concentrations 

above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW05 – TPH-d (17 μg/L), TPH-g (15 μg/L), naphthalene (0.038 μg/L), and toluene (0.31 

μg/L) were detected. None of the chemical constituents analyzed for were detected at 

concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW2254-01 – TPH-g (18 μg/L), naphthalene (0.037 μg/L), toluene (0.71 μg/L), and total 

lead (0.169 μg/L) were detected. None of the chemical constituents analyzed for were 

detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

Groundwater Contaminant Trends 

 RHMW01 – COPCs detected during this round of quarterly sampling were consistent with 

historical data. TPH-d has historically been detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL. 

TPH-d concentrations showed a decreasing trend from 2,500 μg/L in September 2005 to 85 

μg/L in October 2012. 

 RHMW02 – COPCs detected during this round of quarterly sampling were consistent with 

historical data. TPH-d, TPH-g, 1-methylnaphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, and naphthalene 

have historically been detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. TPH-d 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 4-2 January 2013

concentrations show a decreasing trend from a high of 6,000 μg/L in October 2008 to 

concentrations ranging from 1,800-2,200 μg/L during the last several rounds of sampling. 

1-Methylnaphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, and naphthalene show a decreasing trend over 

the long-term. 1-Methylnaphthalene concentrations have decreased from between 102-104 

μg/L in 2005 to between 4.7-24 μg/L during the last few rounds of sampling. 

2-Methylnaphthalene concentrations have decreased from between 87.2-88.5 μg/L in 2005 

to between 12-14 μg/L during this round of sampling. Note, however that 

1-methylnaphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, and naphthalene have increased since the last 

sampling event. Elevated concentrations of these COPCs have been detected during past 

sampling events. TPH-g concentrations showed a slight increasing trend with a substantial 

increase from non-detect during the last round of sampling to 360 μg/L during this round of 

sampling. 

 RHMW03 – COPCs detected during this round of quarterly sampling were consistent with 

historical data. TPH-d has historically been detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL; 

however it has not been detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL since October 

2010. 

 RHMW05 – COPCs detected during this round of quarterly sampling were consistent with 

historical data. TPH-d has historically been detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL; 

however it has not been detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL since January 

2010. 

 RHMW2254-01 – COPCs detected during this round of quarterly sampling were consistent 

with historical data. None of the COPCs have been detected at concentrations above the 

DOH EAL. 

Conclusions and Recommendations 

Since the wells were last sampled (July 2012), groundwater contaminant concentrations in four 

wells (RHMW01, RHMW03, RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01) remained at low concentrations 

and did not change significantly, or were not detected. TPH-d concentrations detected in the 

groundwater sample from well RHMW02 remained consistent with previous analytical data. 

1-Methylnaphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, and naphthalene concentrations have increased 

since the last sampling event; however, elevated concentrations have been detected in 

groundwater samples collected during past sampling events. TPH-g was detected at 

concentrations above the DOH EAL in RHMW02; however, TPH-g concentrations increased in 

October 2010 and then decreased in subsequent sampling events. 

Based on the results of the groundwater monitoring, ESI recommends continuing the 

groundwater monitoring program at the RHSF. If TPH-g concentrations in Well RHMW02 

continue to increase, we recommend increasing monitoring frequency to monthly in accordance 

with the RHSF Groundwater Protection Plan. 

A copy of this report will be submitted to the DOH and a copy be kept on file at NAVFAC. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 5-1 January 2013

SECTION 5 – FUTURE WORK 

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING

Future work includes the first quarter 2013 groundwater monitoring in January 2013. It is 

anticipated that the quarterly groundwater monitoring status reports will be submitted in 

February 2013. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 5-2 January 2013

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 6-1 January 2013

SECTION 6 – REFERENCES 

Atlas of Hawaii, 1983, Department of Geography, University of Hawaii Press. 

DLNR, 1985, Pan Evaporation: State of Hawai’i 1894-1983: Report R74, Division of Water and 

Land Development, August 1995. 

DLNR, 1986, Rainfall Atlas of Hawaii: Report R76, Division of Water and Land Development, 

June 1986. 

DOH, 2000, Hawaii Department of Health, Technical Guidance Manual for Underground 

Storage Tank Closure and Release Response, March 2000. 

DOH, 2011, Screening for Environmental Hazards at Sites with Contaminated Soil and 

Groundwater, Hawai'i Department of Health, Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response, 

December 2011. 

DON, 2007, Project Procedures Manual, U.S. Navy Installation Restoration Program, NAVFAC 

Pacific, Prepared for Pacific Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC Pacific), 

February 2007. 

Earth Tech, 1999, Remedial Investigation, Phase II Technical Report, Red Hill Oily Waste 

Disposal Facility, Halawa, Oahu, Hawaii, Prepared for Naval Facilities Engineering Command, 

Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, 1999. 

Environet, 2010, Work Plan, Long-Term Monitoring, Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl 

Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii, September 2010. 

ESI, 2012, Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl 

Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii, October 2012. 

Foote et al., 1972, Soil Survey of the Islands of Kauai, Oahu, Maui, Molokai, and Lanai, State of 

Hawaii. 

Mink, J. F. and Lau, L. S., 1990, Aquifer Identification and Classification for Oahu: Groundwater 

Protection Strategy for Hawaii: Water Resources Research Center Technical Report No. 179, 

February 1990. 

Stearns, H. T. and Vaksvik, K. N., 1935, Geology and Groundwater Resources of the Island of 

Oahu, Hawaii: Hawaii Div. Hydrogr. Bull. 

Stearns, H. T. and Vaksvik, K. N., 1938, Records of the Drilled Wells on the Island of Oahu, 

Hawaii: Hawaii Div. Hydrogr. Bull. 4, 213 p. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 6-2 January 2013

TEC, 2008, Final Groundwater Protection Plan, Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility, Prepared for 

Navy Region Hawaii, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, January 2008. 

TEC, 2009, Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report, Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility, Prepared 

for Navy Region Hawaii, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, September 2009. 
FIGURES 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
KAENA POINT KAHUKU MAKAHA MAILI NANAKULI WAIANAE BARBERS POINT EWA BEACH HONOLULU INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WAIKIKI DIAMOND HICKAM AFB KAPOLEI EWA MOKULEIA HALEIWA WAIMEA POINT LAIE PUNALUU KAAAWA WAIAHOLE KANEOHE BAY KANEOHE MOKAPU KAILUA WAIMANALO MAKAPUU POINT HAWAII KAHALA KAI HONOLULU WAHIAWA SCHOFIELD BARRACKS PEARL CITY 83 930 803 99 80 780 83 61 63 78 72 61 83 836 76 63 780 93 930 750 99 H3 H1 H1 H1 H2 (RESIDENTIAL HOUSING) 

LAWA 

ONAL 

ILITY NAVY FIRING RANGE RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY 

GRAPHIC SCALE 900 0 900 Scale in Feet The accuracy of this document is limited to the quality and scale of the source information. This document is not a legal representation of an engineered survey. NOTES SOURCES Pearl Harbor Base Map Navy GIS files PROJECT LOCATION FIGURE 1 SITE LOCATION GROUNDWATER MONITORING RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY NAVAL SUPPLY SYSTEM COMMAND (NAVSUP) FLEET LOGISTICS CENTER JBPHH, OAHU, HAWAII
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
RHMW05 RHMW04 HDMW2253-03 SVMP04 SVMP06 SVMP12 SVMP14 SVMP16 SVMP18 SVMP20 SVMP17 SVMP15 SVMP11 SVMP09 SVMP07 SVMP05 SVMP03 RHMW03 (RESIDENTIAL HOUSING) 

RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY SVMP13 SVMP08 HALAWA 

CTIONAL 

ACILITY NAVY FIRING RANGE 

RHMW01 SVMP02 RHMW02 SVMP10 GRAPHIC SCALE 1,200 0 1,200 Scale in Feet The accuracy of this document is limited to the quality and scale of the source information. This document is not a legal representation of an engineered survey. NOTES RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY HALAWA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY HALAWA STREAM BUILDING ROAD ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANK WATER TANK SOIL VAPOR MONITORING POINT GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL BOARD OF WATER SUPPLY PUMP STATION LEGEND SOURCES Pearl Harbor Base Map Navy GIS files FIGURE 2 SITE LAYOUT GROUNDWATER MONITORING RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY NAVAL SUPPLY SYSTEM COMMAND (NAVSUP) FLEET LOGISTICS CENTER JBPHH, OAHU, HAWAII
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
APPENDIX A 

Groundwater Sampling Logs 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Groundwater Sampling Log

Well ID: Location: Project No.:

Initial Water Level: Time:

Total Depth of Well: Personnel Involved:

Length of Saturated Zone: Weather Conditions:

Volume of Water to be Removed: Method of Removal:

Water Level After Purging: Pumping Rate:

Well Purge Data:

-176.5

-167.9

-171.4

-181.6

-182.6

-181.5

-181.9

-187.6

-181.4

0.14

0.14

0.10

0.14

24.11 0.14

0.14

0.10

0.17

0.14

23.64

23.63

23.68

23.72

24.18

24.24

23.90

23.70

8.13

8.20

8.19

0.301 8.22

8.14

7.84

8.21

8.19

8.04

0.304

0.305

0.305

0.304

0.304

0.304

7.85

7.90

6

7

1152 8

0

1

2

3

4

5

1135

1138

1140

1143

1146

1150

- 0.35 L/min

-

-

1131

1133

7.93

7.81

0.304

0.301

Salinity

Redox (ORP) 

(mV)

7.92

7.80

7.77

7.75

7.91

97.42 ft

Time

Volume 

Removed pH

Conductivity 

(mS/cm) DO (mg/l)

Justin Lam, Branden Ibara

-

Bladder Pump

Temperature

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 112066

84.19 ft Date: 10/22/2012 1005

RHMW01

Sample Withdrawal Method:

Appearance of Sample:

Color:

Turbidity:

Sediment:

Other:

Laboratory Analysis Parameters and Preservatives:

Number and Types of Sample Containers:

Sample Identification Numbers:

Decontamination Procedures:

Notes:

Sampled by:

Sampled Delivered to: Transporters:

Date: Time: 10/25/2012 1040

Bladder Pump

Triple Rinsed

Justin Lam, Branden Ibara

Calscience Environmental Lab FedEx

TPH-g, TPH-d - 8015; VOCs - 8260; PAHs - 8270C

lead - 6020

6 - VOAs, 3 - 1L amber jar, 1 - 500ml HDPE bottle

ES001 [1230]

-184.7

-185.5

Clear

Low

None

0.14 181.4

0.14

24.01 0.14

24.00

8.22 23.90

8.27

8.24

0.301

0.301

7.92 0.298

8

9

10

1152

1155

1159

Capacity of Casing (Gallons/Linear Feet)

2"-0.16• 4"-0.65 • 8"-2.61 • 10"-4.08 • 12"-5.87

7.91

7.90

GWSampling Log Inside October
Groundwater Sampling Log

Well ID: Location: Project No.:

Initial Water Level: Time:

Total Depth of Well: Personnel Involved:

Length of Saturated Zone: Weather Conditions:

Volume of Water to be Removed: Method of Removal:

Water Level After Purging: Pumping Rate:

Well Purge Data:

0.27 -190.2

1407 7 6.74 0.551 0.60 24.43 0.27 -188.2

1405 6 6.75 0.553 0.60 24.43

0.27 -190.6

1402 5 6.75 0.553 0.61 24.43 0.27 -190.1

1359 4 6.75 0.551 0.69 24.45

0.26 -199.1

1356 3 6.75 0.548 1.05 24.53 0.26 -192.1

1354 2 6.75 0.549 2.25 24.28

0.25 -161.9

1352 1 7.30 0.542 5.28 25.25 0.26 -193.7

1350 0 7.40 0.527 7.95 25.54

86.81 0.41 L/min

Time

Volume 

Removed pH

Conductivity 

(mS/cm) DO (mg/l) Temperature Salinity

Redox (ORP) 

(mV)

94.35 ft Justin Lam, Branden Ibara

- -

- Bladder Pump

RHMW02 Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 112066

86.81 ft Date: 10/22/2012 1345

Sample Withdrawal Method:

Appearance of Sample:

Color:

Turbidity:

Sediment:

Other:

Laboratory Analysis Parameters and Preservatives:

Number and Types of Sample Containers:

Sample Identification Numbers:

Decontamination Procedures:

Notes:

Sampled by:

Sampled Delivered to: Transporters:

Date: Time:

Calscience Environmental Lab FedEx

10/25/2012 1040

Capacity of Casing (Gallons/Linear Feet)

2"-0.16• 4"-0.65 • 8"-2.61 • 10"-4.08 • 12"-5.87

lead - 6020

22 - VOAs, 8 - 1L amber jar, 5 - 500ml HDPE bottle

ES002 [1415], ES002 MS/MSD [1415], ES003 (Dup) [1330]

Triple Rinsed

Justin Lam, Branden Ibara

Clear

Low

None

TPH-g, TPH-d, - 8015; VOCs - 8260; PAHs - 8270C

Bladder Pump

GWSampling Log Inside October
Groundwater Sampling Log

Well ID: Location: Project No.:

Initial Water Level: Time:

Total Depth of Well: Personnel Involved:

Length of Saturated Zone: Weather Conditions:

Volume of Water to be Removed: Method of Removal:

Water Level After Purging: Pumping Rate:

Well Purge Data:

0.35 -168.5

1605 7 7.03 0.728 2.20 26.90 0.35 -168.9

1602 6 7.03 0.728 2.22 26.90

0.35 -166.1

1600 5 7.03 0.728 2.20 26.90 0.35 -168.1

1557 4 7.04 0.724 2.27 26.97

0.33 -153.6

1555 3 7.05 0.692 3.68 27.61 0.33 -157.1

1552 2 7.24 0.692 4.97 28.42

0.33 -133.1

1550 1 7.52 0.687 5.41 28.11 0.33 -152.1

1547 0 7.62 0.663 5.8 27.58

103.05 ft 0.39 L/min

Time

Volume 

Removed pH

Conductivity 

(mS/cm) DO (mg/l) Temperature Salinity

Redox (ORP) 

(mV)

- Justin Lam, Branden Ibara

- -

- Bladder Pump

RHMW03 Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 112066

103.05 ft Date: 10/22/2012 1535

Sample Withdrawal Method:

Appearance of Sample:

Color:

Turbidity:

Sediment:

Other:

Laboratory Analysis Parameters and Preservatives:

Number and Types of Sample Containers:

Sample Identification Numbers:

Decontamination Procedures:

Notes:

Sampled by:

Sampled Delivered to: Transporters:

Date: Time:

Calscience Environmental Lab FedEx

10/25/2012 1040

Capacity of Casing (Gallons/Linear Feet)

2"-0.16• 4"-0.65 • 8"-2.61 • 10"-4.08 • 12"-5.87

lead - 6020

6 - VOAs, 3 - 1L amber jar, 1 - 500ml HDPE bottle

ES004 [1610]

Triple Rinsed

Justin Lam, Branden Ibara

Clear

Low

None

TPH-g, TPH-d, - 8015; VOCs - 8260; PAHs - 8270C

Bladder Pump

GWSampling Log Inside October
Groundwater Sampling Log

Well ID: Location: Project No.:

Initial Water Level: Time:

Total Depth of Well: Personnel Involved:

Length of Saturated Zone: Weather Conditions:

Volume of Water to be Removed: Method of Removal:

Water Level After Purging: Pumping Rate:

Well Purge Data:

1037 6 7.08 1.091 7.70 22.50 0.53 -167.9

0.53 -166.8

1034 5 7.10 1.101 7.73 22.52 0.53 -167.1

1031 4 7.10 1.071 7.80 22.52

0.49 -165.8

1029 3 7.15 1.054 7.71 22.72 0.53 -166.9

1026 2 7.19 1.002 7.73 23.70

0.50 -166.2

1019 1 7.46 1.018 6.48 22.94 0.50 -170.2

1017 0 7.53 1.016 6.77 22.88

- 0.3 L/min

Time

Volume 

Removed pH

Conductivity 

(mS/cm) DO (mg/l) Temperature Salinity

Redox (ORP) 

(mV)

- Justin Lam, Branden Ibara

- -

- Bladder Pump

RHMW05 Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 112066

83.72 ft Date: 10/23/2012 935

Sample Withdrawal Method:

Appearance of Sample:

Color:

Turbidity:

Sediment:

Other:

Laboratory Analysis Parameters and Preservatives:

Number and Types of Sample Containers:

Sample Identification Numbers:

Decontamination Procedures:

Notes:

Sampled by:

Sampled Delivered to: Transporters:

Date: Time:

Calscience Environmental Lab FedEx

10/25/2012 1040

Capacity of Casing (Gallons/Linear Feet)

2"-0.16• 4"-0.65 • 8"-2.61 • 10"-4.08 • 12"-5.87

lead - 6020

6 - VOAs, 3 - 1L amber jar, 1 - 500ml HDPE bottle

ES005 [1045]

Triple Rinsed

Justin Lam, Branden Ibara

Clear

Low

None

TPH-g, TPH-d, - 8015; VOCs - 8260; PAHs - 8270C

Bladder Pump

GWSampling Log Inside October
Groundwater Sampling Log

Well ID: Location: Project No.:

Initial Water Level: Time:

Total Depth of Well: Personnel Involved:

Length of Saturated Zone: Weather Conditions:

Volume of Water to be Removed: Method of Removal:

Water Level After Purging: Pumping Rate:

Well Purge Data:

0.28 -174.8

1200 5 7.06 0.588 7.54 23.51 0.28 -174.9

1157 4 7.05 0.588 7.54 23.49

0.28 -173.7

1154 3 7.05 0.586 7.55 23.50 0.28 -174.4

1151 2 7.06 0.582 7.53 23.45

0.28 -167.8

1148 1 7.06 0.581 7.24 23.43 0.28 -172.7

1145 0 7.68 0.590 7.3 24.08

83.05 ft 0.33 L/min

Time

Volume 

Removed pH

Conductivity 

(mS/cm) DO (mg/l) Temperature Salinity

Redox (ORP) 

(mV)

- Justin Lam, Branden Ibara

- -

- Bladder Pump

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 112066

83.05 ft Date: 10/23/2012 1025

RHMW2254-01

Sample Withdrawal Method:

Appearance of Sample:

Color:

Turbidity:

Sediment:

Other:

Laboratory Analysis Parameters and Preservatives:

Number and Types of Sample Containers:

Sample Identification Numbers:

Decontamination Procedures:

Notes:

Sampled by:

Sampled Delivered to: Transporters:

Date: Time:

Calscience Environmental Lab FedEx

10/25/2012 1040

Capacity of Casing (Gallons/Linear Feet)

2"-0.16• 4"-0.65 • 8"-2.61 • 10"-4.08 • 12"-5.87

lead - 6020

6 - VOAs, 3 - 1L amber jar, 1 - 500ml HDPE bottle

ES006 [1210]

Triple Rinsed

Justin Lam, Branden Ibara

Clear

Low

None

TPH-g, TPH-d, - 8015; VOCs - 8260; PAHs - 8270C

Bladder Pump

GWSampling Log Inside October
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
APPENDIX B 

Field Notes 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.







This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
APPENDIX C 

Laboratory Reports 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Analytical Report For

Client: Environmental Science International, Inc.

Client Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066

Attention: Robert Chong

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

WORK ORDER NUMBER: 12-10-1749

Richard Villafania

Project Manager

11/1/2012

Page 1 of 49
Contents

Client Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066

Work Order Number: 12-10-1749

1 Client Sample Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

1.1 EPA 6020 ICP/MS Metals (Aqueous) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

1.2 EPA 8015B (M) TPH Diesel (Aqueous) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

1.3 EPA 8270C SIM PAHs (Aqueous) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

1.4 GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B & EPA 8015B(M) TPH Gasoline . . . . . . . .. . . . 14

2 Quality Control Sample Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

2.1 MS/MSD and/or Duplicate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

2.2 LCS/LCSD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36

3 Glossary of Terms and Qualifiers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42

4 Chain of Custody/Sample Receipt Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43

Page 2 of 49
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: 12-10-1749 Client: Environmental Science International, Inc.

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 10/25/12 10:40

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 6020 ICP/MS Metals Extraction: EPA 3020A Total

Client ID: ES001 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 10/22/12 12:30

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-10-1749-1

Lead 0.178 J 0.0898 0.200 1.00 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/26/12 18:31 121026L04D

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

EPA 6020 ICP/MS Metals Extraction: EPA 3020A Total

Client ID: ES002 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 10/22/12 12:30

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-10-1749-2

Lead <0.200 U 0.0898 0.200 1.00 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/26/12 18:28 121026L04D

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

EPA 6020 ICP/MS Metals Extraction: EPA 3020A Total

Client ID: ES003 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 10/22/12 12:30

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-10-1749-3

Lead <0.200 U 0.0898 0.200 1.00 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/26/12 18:35 121026L04D

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

EPA 6020 ICP/MS Metals Extraction: EPA 3020A Total

Client ID: ES004 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 10/22/12 12:30

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-10-1749-4

Lead <0.200 U 0.0898 0.200 1.00 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/26/12 18:39 121026L04D

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

EPA 6020 ICP/MS Metals Extraction: EPA 3020A Total

Client ID: ES005 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 10/22/12 12:30

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-10-1749-5

Lead <0.200 U 0.0898 0.200 1.00 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/26/12 18:43 121026L04D

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

EPA 6020 ICP/MS Metals Extraction: EPA 3020A Total

Client ID: ES006 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 10/22/12 12:30

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-10-1749-6

Lead <0.200 U 0.0898 0.200 1.00 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/26/12 18:46 121026L04D

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 3 of 49
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: 12-10-1749 Client: Environmental Science International, Inc.

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 10/25/12 10:40

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 6020 ICP/MS Metals Extraction: EPA 3020A Total

Client ID: ES006 UF Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 10/22/12 12:30

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-10-1749-8

Lead 0.169 J 0.0898 0.200 1.00 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/26/12 18:50 121026L04D

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

EPA 6020 ICP/MS Metals Extraction: EPA 3020A Total

Client ID: Method Blank Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 10/29/12 16:40

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

099-14-497-5

Lead <0.200 U 0.0898 0.200 1.00 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/26/12 17:38 121026L04D

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 4 of 49
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: 12-10-1749 Client: Environmental Science International, Inc.

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 10/25/12 10:40

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 8015B (M) TPH Diesel Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES001 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 10/22/12 12:30

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-10-1749-1

TPH as Diesel 85 J,HD 15 20 50 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/27/12 02:09 121026B04

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

EPA 8015B (M) TPH Diesel Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES002 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 10/22/12 12:30

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-10-1749-2

TPH as Diesel 2200 HD 15 20 50 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/27/12 02:23 121026B04

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

EPA 8015B (M) TPH Diesel Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES003 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 10/22/12 12:30

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-10-1749-3

TPH as Diesel 1800 HD 15 20 50 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/27/12 02:39 121026B04

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

EPA 8015B (M) TPH Diesel Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES004 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 10/22/12 12:30

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-10-1749-4

TPH as Diesel 45 J ,H D 15 20 50 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/27/12 02:54 121026B04

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

EPA 8015B (M) TPH Diesel Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES005 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 10/22/12 12:30

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-10-1749-5

TPH as Diesel 17 J,HD 15 20 50 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/27/12 03:09 121026B04

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

EPA 8015B (M) TPH Diesel Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES006 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 10/22/12 12:30

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-10-1749-6

TPH as Diesel <20 U 15 20 50 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/27/12 03:24 121026B04

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 5 of 49
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: 099-15-516 Client: Environmental Science International, Inc.

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 10/25/12 10:40

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 8015B (M) TPH Diesel Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: Method Blank Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 10/29/12 15:54

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

099-15-516-12

TPH as Diesel <20 U 15 20 50 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/27/12 00:53 121026B04

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 6 of 49
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 12-10-1749

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 10/25/12 10:40

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 8270C SIM PAHs Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES001 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:10/22/12 12:30

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-10-1749-1

Naphthalene <0.050 U 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 14:37 121026L04

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 U 0.026 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 14:37 121026L04

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 U 0.028 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 14:37 121026L04

Acenaphthylene <0.050 U 0.018 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 14:37 121026L04

Acenaphthene <0.050 U 0.021 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 14:37 121026L04

Fluorene <0.050 U 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 14:37 121026L04

Phenanthrene <0.050 U 0.031 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 14:37 121026L04

Anthracene <0.050 U 0.034 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 14:37 121026L04

Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 14:37 121026L04

Pyrene <0.050 U 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 14:37 121026L04

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.050 U 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 14:37 121026L04

Chrysene <0.050 U 0.019 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 14:37 121026L04

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 14:37 121026L04

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 14:37 121026L04

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.050 U 0.036 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 14:37 121026L04

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.050 U 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 14:37 121026L04

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.050 U 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 14:37 121026L04

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.050 U 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 14:37 121026L04

Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5 (28-139%) 87% 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 14:37 121026L04

Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl (33-144%) 89% 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 14:37 121026L04

Surr: p-Terphenyl-d14 (23-160%) 95% 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 14:37 121026L04

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 7 of 49
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 12-10-1749

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 10/25/12 10:40

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 8270C SIM PAHs Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES002 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:10/22/12 12:30

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-10-1749-2

Naphthalene 63 0.23 0.50 2.0 10 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 17:14 121026L04

2-Methylnaphthalene 14 0.26 0.50 2.0 10 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 17:14 121026L04

1-Methylnaphthalene 24 0.28 0.50 2.0 10 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 17:14 121026L04

Acenaphthylene <0.050 U 0.018 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:03 121026L04

Acenaphthene 0.58 0.021 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:03 121026L04

Fluorene 0.29 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:03 121026L04

Phenanthrene <0.050 U 0.031 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:03 121026L04

Anthracene <0.050 U 0.034 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:03 121026L04

Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:03 121026L04

Pyrene <0.050 U 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:03 121026L04

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.050 U 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:03 121026L04

Chrysene <0.050 U 0.019 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:03 121026L04

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:03 121026L04

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:03 121026L04

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.050 U 0.036 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:03 121026L04

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.050 U 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:03 121026L04

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.050 U 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:03 121026L04

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.050 U 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:03 121026L04

Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5 (28-139%) 86% 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:03 121026L04

Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl (33-144%) 93% 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:03 121026L04

Surr: p-Terphenyl-d14 (23-160%) 90% 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:03 121026L04

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 8 of 49
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 12-10-1749

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 10/25/12 10:40

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 8270C SIM PAHs Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES003 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:10/22/12 12:30

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-10-1749-3

Naphthalene 61 0.23 0.50 2.0 10 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 17:41 121026L04

2-Methylnaphthalene 12 0.26 0.50 2.0 10 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 17:41 121026L04

1-Methylnaphthalene 21 0.28 0.50 2.0 10 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 17:41 121026L04

Acenaphthylene <0.050 U 0.018 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:29 121026L04

Acenaphthene 0.59 0.021 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:29 121026L04

Fluorene 0.30 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:29 121026L04

Phenanthrene <0.050 U 0.031 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:29 121026L04

Anthracene <0.050 U 0.034 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:29 121026L04

Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:29 121026L04

Pyrene <0.050 U 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:29 121026L04

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.050 U 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:29 121026L04

Chrysene <0.050 U 0.019 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:29 121026L04

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:29 121026L04

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:29 121026L04

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.050 U 0.036 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:29 121026L04

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.050 U 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:29 121026L04

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.050 U 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:29 121026L04

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.050 U 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:29 121026L04

Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5 (28-139%) 95% 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:29 121026L04

Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl (33-144%) 97% 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:29 121026L04

Surr: p-Terphenyl-d14 (23-160%) 95% 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:29 121026L04

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 9 of 49
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 12-10-1749

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 10/25/12 10:40

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 8270C SIM PAHs Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES004 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:10/22/12 12:30

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-10-1749-4

Naphthalene 0.029 J 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:56 121026L04

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 U 0.026 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:56 121026L04

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 U 0.028 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:56 121026L04

Acenaphthylene <0.050 U 0.018 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:56 121026L04

Acenaphthene <0.050 U 0.021 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:56 121026L04

Fluorene <0.050 U 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:56 121026L04

Phenanthrene <0.050 U 0.031 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:56 121026L04

Anthracene <0.050 U 0.034 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:56 121026L04

Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:56 121026L04

Pyrene <0.050 U 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:56 121026L04

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.050 U 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:56 121026L04

Chrysene <0.050 U 0.019 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:56 121026L04

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:56 121026L04

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:56 121026L04

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.050 U 0.036 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:56 121026L04

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.050 U 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:56 121026L04

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.050 U 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:56 121026L04

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.050 U 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:56 121026L04

Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5 (28-139%) 87% 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:56 121026L04

Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl (33-144%) 87% 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:56 121026L04

Surr: p-Terphenyl-d14 (23-160%) 92% 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 15:56 121026L04

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 10 of 49
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 12-10-1749

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 10/25/12 10:40

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 8270C SIM PAHs Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES005 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:10/22/12 12:30

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-10-1749-5

Naphthalene 0.038 J 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:22 121026L04

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 U 0.026 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:22 121026L04

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 U 0.028 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:22 121026L04

Acenaphthylene <0.050 U 0.018 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:22 121026L04

Acenaphthene <0.050 U 0.021 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:22 121026L04

Fluorene <0.050 U 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:22 121026L04

Phenanthrene <0.050 U 0.031 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:22 121026L04

Anthracene <0.050 U 0.034 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:22 121026L04

Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:22 121026L04

Pyrene <0.050 U 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:22 121026L04

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.050 U 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:22 121026L04

Chrysene <0.050 U 0.019 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:22 121026L04

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:22 121026L04

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:22 121026L04

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.050 U 0.036 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:22 121026L04

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.050 U 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:22 121026L04

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.050 U 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:22 121026L04

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.050 U 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:22 121026L04

Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5 (28-139%) 84% 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:22 121026L04

Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl (33-144%) 86% 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:22 121026L04

Surr: p-Terphenyl-d14 (23-160%) 95% 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:22 121026L04

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 11 of 49
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 12-10-1749

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 10/25/12 10:40

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 8270C SIM PAHs Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES006 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:10/22/12 12:30

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-10-1749-6

Naphthalene 0.037 J 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:48 121026L04

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 U 0.026 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:48 121026L04

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 U 0.028 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:48 121026L04

Acenaphthylene <0.050 U 0.018 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:48 121026L04

Acenaphthene <0.050 U 0.021 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:48 121026L04

Fluorene <0.050 U 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:48 121026L04

Phenanthrene <0.050 U 0.031 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:48 121026L04

Anthracene <0.050 U 0.034 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:48 121026L04

Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:48 121026L04

Pyrene <0.050 U 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:48 121026L04

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.050 U 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:48 121026L04

Chrysene <0.050 U 0.019 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:48 121026L04

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:48 121026L04

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:48 121026L04

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.050 U 0.036 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:48 121026L04

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.050 U 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:48 121026L04

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.050 U 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:48 121026L04

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.050 U 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:48 121026L04

Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5 (28-139%) 58% 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:48 121026L04

Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl (33-144%) 60% 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:48 121026L04

Surr: p-Terphenyl-d14 (23-160%) 70% 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 16:48 121026L04

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 12 of 49
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 099-15-148

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 10/25/12 10:40

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 8270C SIM PAHs Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: Method Blank Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:10/30/12 13:11

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

099-15-148-1

Naphthalene <0.050 U 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 13:18 121026L04

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 U 0.026 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 13:18 121026L04

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 U 0.028 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 13:18 121026L04

Acenaphthylene <0.050 U 0.018 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 13:18 121026L04

Acenaphthene <0.050 U 0.021 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 13:18 121026L04

Fluorene <0.050 U 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 13:18 121026L04

Phenanthrene <0.050 U 0.031 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 13:18 121026L04

Anthracene <0.050 U 0.034 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 13:18 121026L04

Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 13:18 121026L04

Pyrene <0.050 U 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 13:18 121026L04

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.050 U 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 13:18 121026L04

Chrysene <0.050 U 0.019 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 13:18 121026L04

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 13:18 121026L04

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 13:18 121026L04

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.050 U 0.036 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 13:18 121026L04

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.050 U 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 13:18 121026L04

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.050 U 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 13:18 121026L04

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.050 U 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 13:18 121026L04

Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5 (28-139%) 85% 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 13:18 121026L04

Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl (33-144%) 85% 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 13:18 121026L04

Surr: p-Terphenyl-d14 (23-160%) 96% 10/26/12 00:00 10/30/12 13:18 121026L04

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 13 of 49
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 12-10-1749

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 10/25/12 10:40

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES001 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:10/22/12 12:30

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-10-1749-1

Acetone <10 U 6.0 10 20 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

Benzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 U 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

Bromoform <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

Bromomethane <5.0 U 3.9 5.0 20 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

2-Butanone <5.0 U 2.2 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

Chlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

Chloroethane <5.0 U 2.3 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

Chloroform <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

Chloromethane <5.0 IH,U 1.8 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <5.0 U 1.2 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 U 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 U 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

Ethylbenzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

Methylene Chloride <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 U 4.4 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

Styrene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 U 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

Toluene <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 U 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

Trichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 14 of 49
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 12-10-1749

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 10/25/12 10:40

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES001 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:10/22/12 12:30

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-10-1749-1

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

p/m-Xylene <1.0 U 0.24 1.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

o-Xylene <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 U 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

Gasoline Range Organics 20 B,J 13 30 50 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane (80-126%) 90% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (80-134%) 97% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

Surr: Toluene-d8 (80-120%) 99% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

Surr: Toluene-d8-TPPH (88-112%) 95% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

Surr: 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene (80-120%) 99% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:07 121027L01

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 15 of 49
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 12-10-1749

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 10/25/12 10:40

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES002 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:10/22/12 12:30

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-10-1749-2

Acetone <10 U 6.0 10 20 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

Benzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 U 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

Bromoform <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

Bromomethane <5.0 U 3.9 5.0 20 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

2-Butanone <5.0 U 2.2 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

Chlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

Chloroethane <5.0 U 2.3 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

Chloroform <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

Chloromethane <5.0 IH,U 1.8 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <5.0 U 1.2 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 U 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 U 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

Ethylbenzene 0.18 J 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

Methylene Chloride <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 U 4.4 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

Styrene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 U 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

Toluene 0.59 J 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 U 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

Trichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 16 of 49
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 12-10-1749

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 10/25/12 10:40

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES002 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:10/22/12 12:30

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-10-1749-2

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

p/m-Xylene <1.0 U 0.24 1.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

o-Xylene 0.51 J 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 U 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

Gasoline Range Organics 320 B 13 30 50 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane (80-126%) 82% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (80-134%) 100% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

Surr: Toluene-d8 (80-120%) 97% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

Surr: Toluene-d8-TPPH (88-112%) 94% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

Surr: 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene (80-120%) 101% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 16:10 121027L01

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 17 of 49
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 12-10-1749

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 10/25/12 10:40

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES003 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:10/22/12 12:30

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-10-1749-3

Acetone <10 U 6.0 10 20 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

Benzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 U 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

Bromoform <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

Bromomethane <5.0 U 3.9 5.0 20 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

2-Butanone <5.0 U 2.2 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

Chlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

Chloroethane <5.0 U 2.3 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

Chloroform <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

Chloromethane <5.0 IH,U 1.8 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <5.0 U 1.2 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 U 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 U 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

Ethylbenzene 0.18 J 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

Methylene Chloride <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 U 4.4 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

Styrene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 U 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

Toluene 0.60 J 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 U 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

Trichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 18 of 49
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 12-10-1749

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 10/25/12 10:40

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES003 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:10/22/12 12:30

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-10-1749-3

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

p/m-Xylene <1.0 U 0.24 1.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

o-Xylene 0.47 J 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 U 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

Gasoline Range Organics 360 B 13 30 50 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane (80-126%) 81% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (80-134%) 97% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

Surr: Toluene-d8 (80-120%) 100% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

Surr: Toluene-d8-TPPH (88-112%) 97% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

Surr: 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene (80-120%) 96% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 18:36 121027L01

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 19 of 49
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 12-10-1749

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 10/25/12 10:40

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES004 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:10/22/12 12:30

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-10-1749-4

Acetone <10 U 6.0 10 20 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

Benzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 U 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

Bromoform <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

Bromomethane <5.0 U 3.9 5.0 20 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

2-Butanone <5.0 U 2.2 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

Chlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

Chloroethane <5.0 U 2.3 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

Chloroform <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

Chloromethane <5.0 IH,U 1.8 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <5.0 U 1.2 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 U 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 U 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

Ethylbenzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

Methylene Chloride <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 U 4.4 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

Styrene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 U 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

Toluene 0.54 J 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 U 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

Trichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 20 of 49
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 12-10-1749

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 10/25/12 10:40

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES004 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:10/22/12 12:30

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-10-1749-4

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

p/m-Xylene <1.0 U 0.24 1.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

o-Xylene <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 U 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

Gasoline Range Organics <30 U 13 30 50 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane (80-126%) 85% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (80-134%) 101% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

Surr: Toluene-d8 (80-120%) 100% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

Surr: Toluene-d8-TPPH (88-112%) 96% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

Surr: 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene (80-120%) 97% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:05 121027L01

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 21 of 49
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 12-10-1749

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 10/25/12 10:40

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES005 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:10/22/12 12:30

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-10-1749-5

Acetone <10 U 6.0 10 20 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

Benzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 U 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

Bromoform <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

Bromomethane <5.0 U 3.9 5.0 20 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

2-Butanone <5.0 U 2.2 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

Chlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

Chloroethane <5.0 U 2.3 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

Chloroform <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

Chloromethane <5.0 IH,U 1.8 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <5.0 U 1.2 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 U 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 U 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

Ethylbenzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

Methylene Chloride <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 U 4.4 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

Styrene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 U 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

Toluene 0.31 J 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 U 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

Trichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 22 of 49
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 12-10-1749

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 10/25/12 10:40

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES005 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:10/22/12 12:30

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-10-1749-5

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

p/m-Xylene <1.0 U 0.24 1.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

o-Xylene <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 U 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

Gasoline Range Organics 15 B,J 13 30 50 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane (80-126%) 90% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (80-134%) 100% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

Surr: Toluene-d8 (80-120%) 100% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

Surr: Toluene-d8-TPPH (88-112%) 97% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

Surr: 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene (80-120%) 95% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 19:34 121027L01

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 23 of 49
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 12-10-1749

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 10/25/12 10:40

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES006 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:10/22/12 12:30

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-10-1749-6

Acetone <10 U 6.0 10 20 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

Benzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 U 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

Bromoform <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

Bromomethane <5.0 U 3.9 5.0 20 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

2-Butanone <5.0 U 2.2 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

Chlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

Chloroethane <5.0 U 2.3 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

Chloroform <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

Chloromethane <5.0 IH,U 1.8 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <5.0 U 1.2 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 U 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 U 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

Ethylbenzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

Methylene Chloride <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 U 4.4 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

Styrene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 U 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

Toluene 0.71 J 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 U 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

Trichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 24 of 49
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 12-10-1749

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 10/25/12 10:40

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES006 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:10/22/12 12:30

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-10-1749-6

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

p/m-Xylene <1.0 U 0.24 1.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

o-Xylene <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 U 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

Gasoline Range Organics 18 B,J 13 30 50 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane (80-126%) 90% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (80-134%) 100% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

Surr: Toluene-d8 (80-120%) 98% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

Surr: Toluene-d8-TPPH (88-112%) 95% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

Surr: 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene (80-120%) 98% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 20:03 121027L01

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 25 of 49
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 099-13-057

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 10/25/12 10:40

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: Method Blank Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:10/27/12 15:25

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

099-13-057-1

Acetone <10 U 6.0 10 20 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

Benzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 U 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

Bromoform <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

Bromomethane <5.0 U 3.9 5.0 20 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

2-Butanone <5.0 U 2.2 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

Chlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

Chloroethane <5.0 U 2.3 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

Chloroform <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

Chloromethane <5.0 U 1.8 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <5.0 U 1.2 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 U 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 U 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

Ethylbenzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

Methylene Chloride <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 U 4.4 5.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

Styrene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 U 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

Toluene <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 U 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

Trichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 26 of 49
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 099-13-057

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 10/25/12 10:40

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: Method Blank Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:10/27/12 15:25

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

099-13-057-1

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

p/m-Xylene <1.0 U 0.24 1.0 10 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

o-Xylene <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 U 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

Gasoline Range Organics 14 J 13 30 50 1 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane (80-126%) 90% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (80-134%) 99% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

Surr: Toluene-d8 (80-120%) 98% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

Surr: Toluene-d8-TPPH (88-112%) 95% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

Surr: 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene (80-120%) 97% 10/27/12 00:00 10/27/12 15:41 121027L01

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 27 of 49
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: 12-10-1749 Client: Environmental Science International, Inc.

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 10/25/12 10:40

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 8015B (M) TPH Gasoline Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES Trip Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 10/22/12 12:30

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-10-1749-7

TPH as Gasoline <100 U 44 100 200 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/26/12 15:09 121025B01

Surr: 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene (49-133%) 76% 10/26/12 00:00 10/26/12 15:09 121025B01

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

EPA 8015B (M) TPH Gasoline Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: Method Blank Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 10/27/12 15:13

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

099-14-495-2

TPH as Gasoline <100 U 44 100 200 1 10/26/12 00:00 10/26/12 13:37 121025B01

Surr: 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene (49-133%) 75% 10/26/12 00:00 10/26/12 13:37 121025B01

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

Page 28 of 49
Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

Work Order No: 12-10-1749

Method: EPA 6020

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Environmental Science International, Inc.

Project Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 3020A Total

Date Received: 10/25/12

Quality Control Sample ID

ES002

MS/MSD Batch

Number

121026S04

Matrix

Aqueous

Date

Analyzed

10/26/12

Date

Prepared

10/26/12

Instrument

ICP/MS 04

MS

%REC

MSD

%REC

SPIKE %REC CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

ADDED

Parameter SAMPLE

CONC

MS

CONC

MSD

CONC

Lead ND 100.0 99.10 99 99.34 99 80-120 0 0-20

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 29 of 49
Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

Work Order No: 12-10-1749

Method: EPA 8015B (M)

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Environmental Science International, Inc.

Project Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Date Received: 10/25/12

Quality Control Sample ID

ES002

MS/MSD Batch

Number

121025S01

Matrix

Aqueous

Date

Analyzed

10/26/12

Date

Prepared

10/26/12

Instrument

GC 4

MS

%REC

MSD

%REC

SPIKE %REC CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

ADDED

Parameter SAMPLE

CONC

MS

CONC

MSD

CONC

TPH as Gasoline 625.7 2000 2510 94 2503 94 70-112 0 0-17

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Page 30 of 49
Quality Control - PDS / PDSD

Work Order No: 12-10-1749

Method: EPA 6020

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Environmental Science International, Inc.

Project Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 3020A Total

Date Received 10/25/12

Quality Control Sample ID

ES002

PDS/PDSD Batch

Number

121026S04

Matrix

Aqueous

Date Analyzed

10/26/12

Date

Prepared

10/26/12

Instrument

ICP/MS 04

Parameter SAMPLE_CONC SPIKE_ADDED PDS_CONC PDS %REC %REC CL Qualifiers

Lead ND 100.0 98.59 99 75-125

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 31 of 49
Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

Work Order No: 12-10-1749

Method: EPA 8015B (M)

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Environmental Science International, Inc.

Project Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Date Received: 10/25/12

Quality Control Sample ID

ES002

MS/MSD Batch

Number

121026S04

Matrix

Aqueous

Date

Analyzed

10/27/12

Date

Prepared

10/26/12

Instrument

GC 46

MS

%REC

MSD

%REC

SPIKE %REC CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

ADDED

Parameter SAMPLE

CONC

MS

CONC

MSD

CONC

TPH as Diesel 2175 4000 5496 83 5404 81 55-133 2 0-30

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 32 of 49
Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

Work Order No: 12-10-1749

Method: EPA 8270C SIM PAHs

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Environmental Science International, Inc.

Project Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Date Received: 10/25/12

Quality Control Sample ID

ES002

MS/MSD Batch

Number

121026S04

Matrix

Aqueous

Date

Analyzed

10/30/12

Date

Prepared

10/26/12

Instrument

GC/MS AAA

MS

%REC

MSD

%REC

SPIKE %REC CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

ADDED

Parameter SAMPLE

CONC

MS

CONC

MSD

CONC

Naphthalene 63.40 2.000 55.84 0 57.72 0 21-133 3 0-25 3

2-Methylnaphthalene 14.00 2.000 18.12 206 11.60 0 21-140 44 0-25 3,4

1-Methylnaphthalene 23.50 2.000 27.13 181 22.69 0 20-140 18 0-25 3

Acenaphthylene ND 2.000 1.744 87 1.948 97 33-145 11 0-25

Acenaphthene 0.5760 2.000 2.116 77 2.345 88 49-121 10 0-25

Fluorene 0.2872 2.000 2.026 87 2.175 94 59-121 7 0-25

Phenanthrene ND 2.000 1.700 85 1.821 91 54-120 7 0-25

Anthracene ND 2.000 1.189 59 1.253 63 27-133 5 0-25

Fluoranthene ND 2.000 1.836 92 1.882 94 26-137 2 0-25

Pyrene ND 2.000 1.882 94 2.040 102 18-168 8 0-25

Benzo (a) Anthracene ND 2.000 1.978 99 2.147 107 33-143 8 0-25

Chrysene ND 2.000 1.867 93 2.037 102 17-168 9 0-25

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene ND 2.000 2.031 102 2.169 108 24-159 7 0-25

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene ND 2.000 2.004 100 2.098 105 24-159 5 0-25

Benzo (a) Pyrene ND 2.000 1.789 89 1.890 95 17-163 6 0-25

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene ND 2.000 1.698 85 1.915 96 10-171 12 0-25

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene ND 2.000 1.496 75 1.602 80 10-219 7 0-25

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene ND 2.000 1.584 79 1.772 89 10-227 11 0-25

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 33 of 49
Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

Work Order No: 12-10-1749

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Environmental Science International, Inc.

Project Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Date Received: 10/25/12

Quality Control Sample ID

ES002

MS/MSD Batch

Number

121027S01

Matrix

Aqueous

Date

Analyzed

10/27/12

Date

Prepared

10/27/12

Instrument

GC/MS LL

MS

%REC

MSD

%REC

SPIKE %REC CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

ADDED

Parameter SAMPLE

CONC

MS

CONC

MSD

CONC

Acetone ND 50.00 60.88 122 53.86 108 40-140 12 0-20

Benzene ND 50.00 47.33 95 47.12 94 80-120 0 0-20

Bromobenzene ND 50.00 50.93 102 51.31 103 75-125 1 0-20

Bromochloromethane ND 50.00 51.51 103 51.85 104 65-135 1 0-20

Bromodichloromethane ND 50.00 49.43 99 48.71 97 75-120 1 0-20

Bromoform ND 50.00 51.25 102 50.72 101 70-130 1 0-20

Bromomethane ND 50.00 53.28 107 42.30 85 30-145 23 0-20 4

2-Butanone ND 50.00 46.04 92 49.24 98 30-150 7 0-20

n-Butylbenzene 4.084 50.00 61.70 115 60.56 113 70-135 2 0-20

sec-Butylbenzene 3.971 50.00 57.50 107 57.74 108 70-125 0 0-20

tert-Butylbenzene ND 50.00 52.27 105 57.32 115 70-130 9 0-20

Carbon Disulfide ND 50.00 45.64 91 37.96 76 35-160 18 0-20

Carbon Tetrachloride ND 50.00 49.20 98 48.58 97 65-140 1 0-20

Chlorobenzene ND 50.00 49.99 100 50.56 101 80-120 1 0-20

Chloroethane ND 50.00 55.37 111 54.73 109 60-135 1 0-20

Chloroform ND 50.00 47.39 95 47.56 95 65-135 0 0-20

Chloromethane ND 50.00 47.31 95 34.86 70 40-125 30 0-20 4

2-Chlorotoluene ND 50.00 51.20 102 52.08 104 75-125 2 0-20

4-Chlorotoluene ND 50.00 51.36 103 52.38 105 75-130 2 0-20

Dibromochloromethane ND 50.00 50.51 101 50.36 101 60-135 0 0-20

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane ND 50.00 53.27 107 54.42 109 50-130 2 0-20

1,2-Dibromoethane ND 50.00 52.84 106 51.17 102 80-120 3 0-20

Dibromomethane ND 50.00 49.19 98 48.96 98 75-125 0 0-20

1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 50.00 51.33 103 51.52 103 70-120 0 0-20

1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 50.00 50.24 100 51.96 104 75-125 3 0-20

1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 50.00 50.81 102 50.87 102 75-125 0 0-20

Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 50.00 44.27 89 45.45 91 30-155 3 0-20

1,1-Dichloroethane ND 50.00 46.40 93 44.70 89 70-135 4 0-20

1,2-Dichloroethane ND 50.00 51.93 104 51.28 103 70-130 1 0-20

1,1-Dichloroethene ND 50.00 43.75 87 44.86 90 70-130 3 0-20

c-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 50.00 48.95 98 48.50 97 70-125 1 0-20

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 34 of 49
Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

Work Order No: 12-10-1749

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Environmental Science International, Inc.

Project Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Date Received: 10/25/12

Quality Control Sample ID

ES002

MS/MSD Batch

Number

121027S01

Matrix

Aqueous

Date

Analyzed

10/27/12

Date

Prepared

10/27/12

Instrument

GC/MS LL

MS

%REC

MSD

%REC

SPIKE %REC CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

ADDED

Parameter SAMPLE

CONC

MS

CONC

MSD

CONC

t-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 50.00 46.83 94 47.08 94 60-140 1 0-20

1,2-Dichloropropane ND 50.00 48.60 97 48.58 97 75-125 0 0-20

1,3-Dichloropropane ND 50.00 51.96 104 50.04 100 75-125 4 0-20

2,2-Dichloropropane ND 50.00 48.31 97 47.24 94 70-135 2 0-20

1,1-Dichloropropene ND 50.00 52.52 105 53.00 106 75-130 1 0-20

c-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 50.00 50.40 101 51.50 103 70-130 2 0-20

t-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 50.00 48.45 97 47.74 95 55-140 1 0-20

Ethylbenzene ND 50.00 52.02 104 52.23 104 75-125 0 0-20

2-Hexanone ND 50.00 50.24 100 50.78 102 55-130 1 0-20

Isopropylbenzene ND 50.00 55.69 111 57.50 115 75-125 3 0-20

p-Isopropyltoluene ND 50.00 53.20 106 54.01 108 75-130 2 0-20

Methylene Chloride ND 50.00 42.07 84 42.75 86 55-140 2 0-20

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone ND 50.00 52.17 104 52.04 104 60-135 0 0-20

Naphthalene 84.85 50.00 136.0 102 133.6 98 55-140 2 0-20

n-Propylbenzene 6.182 50.00 58.80 105 59.24 106 70-130 1 0-20

Styrene ND 50.00 53.76 108 53.97 108 65-135 0 0-20

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 50.00 52.02 104 50.55 101 80-130 3 0-20

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 50.00 50.08 100 49.95 100 65-130 0 0-20

Tetrachloroethene ND 50.00 53.25 107 53.84 108 45-150 1 0-20

Toluene ND 50.00 50.15 100 50.26 101 75-120 0 0-20

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 50.00 56.99 114 57.59 115 55-140 1 0-20

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 50.00 59.97 120 60.24 120 65-135 0 0-20

1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 50.00 49.06 98 49.03 98 65-130 0 0-20

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene ND 50.00 52.92 106 53.38 107 50-140 1 0-20

1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane ND 50.00 47.59 95 47.96 96 80-130 1 0-20

1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 50.00 50.18 100 49.79 100 75-125 1 0-20

Trichloroethene ND 50.00 49.43 99 50.16 100 70-125 1 0-20

Trichlorofluoromethane ND 50.00 54.54 109 54.19 108 60-145 1 0-20

1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 50.00 51.62 103 51.28 103 75-125 1 0-20

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 50.00 55.07 110 55.28 111 75-130 0 0-20

1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 50.00 52.97 106 52.89 106 75-130 0 0-20

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 35 of 49
Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

Work Order No: 12-10-1749

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Environmental Science International, Inc.

Project Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Date Received: 10/25/12

Quality Control Sample ID

ES002

MS/MSD Batch

Number

121027S01

Matrix

Aqueous

Date

Analyzed

10/27/12

Date

Prepared

10/27/12

Instrument

GC/MS LL

MS

%REC

MSD

%REC

SPIKE %REC CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

ADDED

Parameter SAMPLE

CONC

MS

CONC

MSD

CONC

Vinyl Acetate ND 50.00 50.26 101 49.42 99 80-120 2 0-20

Vinyl Chloride ND 50.00 49.12 98 50.69 101 50-145 3 0-20

p/m-Xylene ND 100.0 103.7 104 104.3 104 75-130 1 0-20

o-Xylene ND 50.00 51.75 103 52.26 105 80-120 1 0-20

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) ND 50.00 47.18 94 47.15 94 65-125 0 0-20

Tert-Butyl Alcohol (TBA) ND 250.0 283.2 113 291.5 117 46-154 3 0-35

Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE) ND 50.00 49.96 100 50.35 101 81-123 1 0-20

Ethyl-t-Butyl Ether (ETBE) ND 50.00 50.99 102 50.97 102 74-122 0 0-20

Tert-Amyl-Methyl Ether (TAME) ND 50.00 51.21 102 50.01 100 76-124 2 0-20

Ethanol ND 500.0 562.1 112 568.0 114 60-138 1 0-35

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 36 of 49
Quality Control - LCS/LCS Duplicate

Method: EPA 6020

12-10-1749

Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 3020A Total

Work Order No:

Date Received:

Project:

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

N/A

10/26/12

Matrix

Aqueous

Instrument

LCS/LCSD Batch

Number

ICP/MS 04 121026L04D

Date

Prepared

Date

Analyzed

10/26/12

Quality Control Sample ID

099-14-497-5

Parameter %REC CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers LCS

%REC

LCSD

%REC

SPIKE

ADDED

LCS

CONC

LCSD

CONC

Lead 100.0 96.10 96 93.29 93 80-120 3 0-20

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 37 of 49
Quality Control - LCS/LCS Duplicate

Method: EPA 8015B (M)

12-10-1749

Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Work Order No:

Date Received:

Project:

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

N/A

10/26/12

Matrix

Aqueous

Instrument

LCS/LCSD Batch

Number

GC 46 121026B04

Date

Prepared

Date

Analyzed

10/27/12

Quality Control Sample ID

099-15-516-12

Parameter %REC CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers LCS

%REC

LCSD

%REC

SPIKE

ADDED

LCS

CONC

LCSD

CONC

TPH as Diesel 4000 3478 87 3444 86 60-132 1 0-11

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 38 of 49
Quality Control - LCS/LCS Duplicate

Method: EPA 8270C SIM PAHs

12-10-1749

Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Work Order No:

Date Received:

Project:

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

N/A

10/26/12

Matrix

Aqueous

Instrument

LCS/LCSD Batch

Number

GC/MS AAA 121026L04

Date

Prepared

Date

Analyzed

10/30/12

Quality Control Sample ID

099-15-148-1

Parameter %REC CL RPD CL Qualifiers

LCSD

%REC ME_CL RPD

LCS

%REC

SPIKE

ADDED

LCS

CONC

LCSD

CONC

Naphthalene 2.000 1.393 70 1.384 69 21-133 2-152 1 0-25

2-Methylnaphthalene 2.000 1.560 78 1.538 77 21-140 1-160 1 0-25

1-Methylnaphthalene 2.000 1.605 80 1.574 79 20-140 0-160 2 0-25

Acenaphthylene 2.000 1.129 56 1.121 56 33-145 14-164 1 0-25

Acenaphthene 2.000 1.315 66 1.317 66 55-121 44-132 0 0-25

Fluorene 2.000 1.539 77 1.549 77 59-121 49-131 1 0-25

Phenanthrene 2.000 1.434 72 1.430 72 54-120 43-131 0 0-25

Anthracene 2.000 0.6780 34 0.6818 34 27-133 9-151 1 0-25

Fluoranthene 2.000 1.502 75 1.508 75 26-137 8-156 0 0-25

Pyrene 2.000 1.577 79 1.595 80 45-129 31-143 1 0-25

Benzo (a) Anthracene 2.000 1.612 81 1.618 81 33-143 15-161 0 0-25

Chrysene 2.000 1.571 79 1.570 79 17-168 0-193 0 0-25

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene 2.000 1.859 93 1.980 99 24-159 2-182 6 0-25

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene 2.000 1.957 98 1.904 95 24-159 2-182 3 0-25

Benzo (a) Pyrene 2.000 1.303 65 1.313 66 17-163 0-187 1 0-25

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene 2.000 1.710 85 1.722 86 25-175 0-200 1 0-25

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene 2.000 1.519 76 1.518 76 25-175 0-200 0 0-25

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene 2.000 1.612 81 1.587 79 25-157 3-179 2 0-25

LCS ME CL validation result : Pass

Total number of ME compounds allowed : 1

Total number of ME compounds : 0

Total number of LCS compounds : 18

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 39 of 49
Quality Control - LCS/LCS Duplicate

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

12-10-1749

Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Work Order No:

Date Received:

Project:

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

N/A

10/27/12

Matrix

Aqueous

Instrument

LCS/LCSD Batch

Number

GC/MS LL 121027L01

Date

Prepared

Date

Analyzed

10/27/12

Quality Control Sample ID

099-13-057-1

Parameter %REC CL RPD CL Qualifiers

LCSD

%REC ME_CL RPD

LCS

%REC

SPIKE

ADDED

LCS

CONC

LCSD

CONC

Acetone 50.00 52.97 106 48.49 97 40-140 23-157 9 0-20

Benzene 50.00 47.48 95 46.85 94 80-120 73-127 1 0-20

Bromobenzene 50.00 51.80 104 50.57 101 75-125 67-133 2 0-20

Bromochloromethane 50.00 50.48 101 51.82 104 65-130 54-141 3 0-20

Bromodichloromethane 50.00 50.42 101 49.15 98 75-120 68-128 3 0-20

Bromoform 50.00 54.73 109 52.24 104 70-130 60-140 5 0-20

Bromomethane 50.00 36.14 72 33.71 67 30-145 11-164 7 0-20

2-Butanone 50.00 52.05 104 46.99 94 30-150 10-170 10 0-20

n-Butylbenzene 50.00 54.92 110 53.37 107 70-135 59-146 3 0-20

sec-Butylbenzene 50.00 53.24 106 53.08 106 70-125 61-134 0 0-20

tert-Butylbenzene 50.00 56.06 112 54.21 108 70-130 60-140 3 0-20

Carbon Disulfide 50.00 46.55 93 37.41 75 35-160 14-181 22 0-20 X

Carbon Tetrachloride 50.00 51.40 103 50.21 100 65-140 52-152 2 0-20

Chlorobenzene 50.00 51.00 102 50.36 101 80-120 73-127 1 0-20

Chloroethane 50.00 56.14 112 54.25 108 60-135 48-148 3 0-20

Chloroform 50.00 49.68 99 47.96 96 65-135 53-147 4 0-20

Chloromethane 50.00 51.48 103 39.27 79 40-125 26-139 27 0-20 X

2-Chlorotoluene 50.00 52.62 105 51.57 103 75-125 67-133 2 0-20

4-Chlorotoluene 50.00 51.80 104 51.37 103 75-130 66-139 1 0-20

Dibromochloromethane 50.00 53.03 106 51.77 104 60-135 48-148 2 0-20

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 50.00 52.20 104 52.48 105 50-130 37-143 1 0-20

1,2-Dibromoethane 50.00 53.44 107 51.06 102 80-120 73-127 5 0-20

Dibromomethane 50.00 49.84 100 48.02 96 75-125 67-133 4 0-20

1,2-Dichlorobenzene 50.00 52.47 105 51.72 103 70-120 62-128 1 0-20

1,3-Dichlorobenzene 50.00 51.97 104 50.16 100 75-125 67-133 4 0-20

1,4-Dichlorobenzene 50.00 51.04 102 48.56 97 75-125 67-133 5 0-20

Dichlorodifluoromethane 50.00 51.52 103 50.72 101 30-155 9-176 2 0-20

1,1-Dichloroethane 50.00 46.71 93 45.02 90 70-135 59-146 4 0-20

1,2-Dichloroethane 50.00 51.05 102 50.48 101 70-130 60-140 1 0-20

1,1-Dichloroethene 50.00 44.03 88 44.04 88 70-130 60-140 0 0-20

c-1,2-Dichloroethene 50.00 49.33 99 49.39 99 70-125 61-134 0 0-20

t-1,2-Dichloroethene 50.00 47.96 96 46.52 93 60-140 47-153 3 0-20

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 40 of 49
Quality Control - LCS/LCS Duplicate

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

12-10-1749

Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Work Order No:

Date Received:

Project:

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

N/A

10/27/12

Matrix

Aqueous

Instrument

LCS/LCSD Batch

Number

GC/MS LL 121027L01

Date

Prepared

Date

Analyzed

10/27/12

Quality Control Sample ID

099-13-057-1

Parameter %REC CL RPD CL Qualifiers

LCSD

%REC ME_CL RPD

LCS

%REC

SPIKE

ADDED

LCS

CONC

LCSD

CONC

1,2-Dichloropropane 50.00 48.42 97 47.73 95 75-125 67-133 1 0-20

1,3-Dichloropropane 50.00 51.45 103 50.06 100 75-125 67-133 3 0-20

2,2-Dichloropropane 50.00 47.90 96 48.12 96 70-135 59-146 0 0-20

1,1-Dichloropropene 50.00 53.21 106 52.35 105 75-130 66-139 2 0-20

c-1,3-Dichloropropene 50.00 51.86 104 50.46 101 70-130 60-140 3 0-20

t-1,3-Dichloropropene 50.00 48.54 97 47.22 94 55-140 41-154 3 0-20

Ethylbenzene 50.00 52.66 105 52.49 105 75-125 67-133 0 0-20

2-Hexanone 50.00 49.35 99 48.65 97 55-130 42-142 1 0-20

Isopropylbenzene 50.00 53.35 107 52.74 105 75-125 67-133 1 0-20

p-Isopropyltoluene 50.00 52.89 106 51.82 104 75-130 66-139 2 0-20

Methylene Chloride 50.00 42.81 86 41.31 83 55-140 41-154 4 0-20

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 50.00 49.57 99 50.13 100 60-135 48-148 1 0-20

Naphthalene 50.00 58.55 117 49.48 99 55-140 41-154 17 0-20

n-Propylbenzene 50.00 53.07 106 52.28 105 70-130 60-140 2 0-20

Styrene 50.00 54.11 108 53.38 107 65-135 53-147 1 0-20

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 50.00 52.64 105 51.54 103 80-130 72-138 2 0-20

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 50.00 51.75 104 50.01 100 65-130 54-141 3 0-20

Tetrachloroethene 50.00 52.44 105 50.82 102 45-150 28-168 3 0-20

Toluene 50.00 49.72 99 48.85 98 75-120 68-128 2 0-20

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 50.00 57.03 114 51.66 103 55-140 41-154 10 0-20

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 50.00 56.73 113 51.86 104 65-135 53-147 9 0-20

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 50.00 50.57 101 49.18 98 65-130 54-141 3 0-20

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene 50.00 51.65 103 50.52 101 50-140 35-155 2 0-20

1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane 50.00 49.03 98 47.75 95 80-130 72-138 3 0-20

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 50.00 51.78 104 49.60 99 75-125 67-133 4 0-20

Trichloroethene 50.00 49.85 100 49.24 98 70-125 61-134 1 0-20

Trichlorofluoromethane 50.00 55.73 111 54.65 109 60-145 46-159 2 0-20

1,2,3-Trichloropropane 50.00 52.45 105 50.67 101 75-125 67-133 3 0-20

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 50.00 53.93 108 51.79 104 75-130 66-139 4 0-20

1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 50.00 54.03 108 52.08 104 75-130 66-139 4 0-20

Vinyl Acetate 50.00 54.46 109 51.62 103 80-120 73-127 5 0-20

Vinyl Chloride 50.00 52.44 105 50.63 101 50-145 34-161 4 0-20

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 41 of 49
Quality Control - LCS/LCS Duplicate

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

12-10-1749

Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Work Order No:

Date Received:

Project:

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

N/A

10/27/12

Matrix

Aqueous

Instrument

LCS/LCSD Batch

Number

GC/MS LL 121027L01

Date

Prepared

Date

Analyzed

10/27/12

Quality Control Sample ID

099-13-057-1

Parameter %REC CL RPD CL Qualifiers

LCSD

%REC ME_CL RPD

LCS

%REC

SPIKE

ADDED

LCS

CONC

LCSD

CONC

p/m-Xylene 100.0 105.5 106 104.2 104 75-130 66-139 1 0-20

o-Xylene 50.00 52.02 104 51.17 102 80-120 73-127 2 0-20

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) 50.00 47.87 96 45.99 92 65-125 55-135 4 0-20

Tert-Butyl Alcohol (TBA) 250.0 295.4 118 221.4 89 46-154 28-172 29 0-25 X

Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE) 50.00 51.06 102 49.67 99 81-123 74-130 3 0-20

Ethyl-t-Butyl Ether (ETBE) 50.00 52.42 105 50.57 101 74-122 66-130 4 0-20

Tert-Amyl-Methyl Ether (TAME) 50.00 50.77 102 49.44 99 76-124 68-132 3 0-20

Ethanol 500.0 577.3 115 570.3 114 60-138 47-151 1 0-25

Gasoline Range Organics 1000 863.5 86 821.9 82 80-120 73-127 5 0-20

LCS ME CL validation result : Pass

Total number of ME compounds allowed : 4

Total number of ME compounds : 0

Total number of LCS compounds : 73

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 42 of 49
Quality Control - LCS/LCS Duplicate

Method: EPA 8015B (M)

12-10-1749

Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Work Order No:

Date Received:

Project:

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

N/A

10/26/12

Matrix

Aqueous

Instrument

LCS/LCSD Batch

Number

GC 4 121025B01

Date

Prepared

Date

Analyzed

10/26/12

Quality Control Sample ID

099-14-495-2

Parameter %REC CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers LCS

%REC

LCSD

%REC

SPIKE

ADDED

LCS

CONC

LCSD

CONC

TPH as Gasoline 2000 1864 93 1825 91 72-114 2 0-10

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Page 43 of 49
Glossary of Terms and Qualifiers

Work Order Number:

Qualifier Definition

12-10-1749

* See applicable analysis comment.

< Less than the indicated value.

> Greater than the indicated value.

Surrogate compound recovery was out of control due to a required sample dilution. Therefore, the sample

data was reported without further clarification.

1

Surrogate compound recovery was out of control due to matrix interference. The associated method blank

surrogate spike compound was in control and, therefore, the sample data was reported without further

clarification.

2

Recovery of the Matrix Spike (MS) or Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) compound was out of control due to

matrix interference. The associated LCS and/or LCSD was in control and, therefore, the sample data was

reported without further clarification.

3

The MS/MSD RPD was out of control due to matrix interference. The LCS/LCSD RPD was in control and,

therefore, the sample data was reported without further clarification.

4

The PDS/PDSD or PES/PESD associated with this batch of samples was out of control due to a matrix

interference effect. The associated batch LCS/LCSD was in control and, hence, the associated sample

data was reported without further clarification.

5

6 Surrogate recovery below the acceptance limit.

7 Surrogate recovery above the acceptance limit.

B Analyte was present in the associated method blank.

BU Sample analyzed after holding time expired.

The Detection Limit (DL) is the smallest analyte concentration that can be demonstrated to be different

from zero or a blank concentration at the 99% level of confidence.

DL

E Concentration exceeds the calibration range.

ET Sample was extracted past end of recommended max. holding time.

HD The chromatographic pattern was inconsistent with the profile of the reference fuel standard.

ICH Initial calibrtn. verif. recov. above method CL for this analyte.

ICJ Initial calibrtn. verif. recov. below method CL for this analyte.

IH Calibrtn. verif. recov. below method CL for this analyte.

IJ Calibrtn. verif. recov. above method CL for this analyte.

J Analyte was detected at a concentration below the LOQ and above the DL. Reported value is estimated.

The Limit of Detection (LOD) is the smallest amount or concentration of a substance that must be present

in a sample in order to be detected at 99% confidence level.

LOD

The Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) is the lowest concentration of a substance that produces a quantitative

result within specified limits of precision and bias.

LOQ

Spike recovery and RPD control limits do not apply resulting from the parameter concentration in the

sample exceeding the spike concentration by a factor of four or greater.

Q

SG The sample extract was subjected to Silica Gel treatment prior to analysis.

U Undetected at Detection Limit (DL) and is reported as less than the Limit of Detection (LOD).

X % Recovery and/or RPD out-of-range.

Z Analyte presence was not confirmed by second column or GC/MS analysis.

Solid - Unless otherwise indicated, solid sample data is reported on a wet weight basis, not corrected for

% moisture. All QC results are reported on a wet weight basis.

MPN - Most Probable Number

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 44 of 49
Return to Contents

Page 45 of 49
Return to Contents

Page 46 of 49
Return to Contents

Page 47 of 49
Return to Contents

Page 48 of 49
Return to Contents

Page 49 of 49
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
APPENDIX D 

Waste Disposal Manifest 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.