alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ADDENDUM #1 TO LICENSE AND RESEARCH FUNDING AGREEMENT dated Dec. 14th, 2016


This addendum effective as of Dec. 13, 2017


("the Addendum")







Qrons Inc. (formerly BioLabMart Inc.), (" Qrons") and Ariel Scientific Innovations Ltd. (formerly Ariel University R&D Co., Ltd.), ("Ariel") (collectively the "Parties")


Whereas, the Parties have entered into a Licenses and Research Funding Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of December 14, 2016, and;


Whereas, as part of the consideration given by Qrons, under Paragraph 7.3 of the Agreement, Ariel received a Warrant (the "Warrant") that is exercisable into 4% of the Company's issued and outstanding shares upon the occurrence of an "Exit Event", all as set in the Agreement; and;


Whereas, Qrons had its Registration Statement declared effective by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and further having had its stock approved for quotation by FINRA; and:


Whereas, The Parties have reached an agreement regarding a partial exercise of the Warrant, as agreed herein;


Now therefore, the Parties have agreed as follows:



	
1.

	
The preamble to this Addendum shall form an integral part thereof.








	
2.

	
The Parties agree that an Exit Event has not yet occurred, but it is agreed that Ariel shall have the right to exercise the Warrant partially by execution this Addendum. The partial exercise of the Warrant shall be at a rate of 1% of the issued and outstanding share capital of Qrons and Ariel shall be issued shares representing 1% of the outstanding share capital of Qrons, for no consideration, immediately after the execution of this Addendum ("the Partial Shares").








	
3.

	
 Ariel's right to the remaining part of the Warrant, namely 3% of the issued and outstanding share capital of Qrons at the date the balance of the Warrant is exercised, shall remain valid and in full force and shall be exercised per the terms of the Agreement.








	
4.

	
 It is agreed that Ariel shall not have the right to request a demand registration until the balance of the Warrant (namely the right to the additional 3% shares) is exercised. Upon initiation of such demand, as per the terms of the Agreement,  by Ariel, after the 3% balance of the Warrant is exercised, Qrons shall include in such registration statement the shares issued per the exercise of the balance of the Warrant (3%) and any of the Partial Shares not sold by Ariel.








	
5.

	
All other terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.







In witness whereof:


/s/Jonah Meer                                                  /s/Larry Loev                                     


Qrons Inc.                                                                             Ariel Scientific Innovations, Ltd


by: Jonah Meer, its CEO                                                      by: Larry Loev  its CEO
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Government Accountability Office

# AGENCY:

Government Accountability Office (GAO).

# ACTION:

Request for letters of nomination and resumes.

# SUMMARY:

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act gave the Comptroller General of the United States responsibility for appointing up to 21 members to the Board of Governors of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. In addition, the Directors of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the National Institutes of Health, or their designees, are members of the Board. As the result of terms ending in September 2022, GAO is accepting nominations in the following categories: A surgeon, a state-licensed integrative health care practitioner, a representative of patients and health care consumers, a representative of device manufacturers or developers, a representative of pharmaceutical manufacturers or developers, and a representative of private payers who represents health insurance issuers. Nominations should be sent to the email address listed below. Acknowledgement of submissions will be provided within a week of submission.

# DATES:

Letters of nomination and resumes should be submitted no later than May 10, 2022, to ensure adequate opportunity for review and consideration of nominees prior to appointment.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Submit letters of nomination and resumes to                         *PCORI@gao.gov.*                         Include PCORI Nomination in the subject line of the email.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ray Sendejas at (202) 512-7113 or                         *SendejasR@gao.gov*                         if you do not receive an acknowledgement or need additional information. For general information, contact GAO's Office of Public Affairs, (202) 512-4800.                    

*Authority:*                         Sec. 6301 and Sec. 10602, Pub. L. 111-148, 124 Stat. 119, 727, 1005 (2010); Div. N, Sec. 104, Pub. L. 116-94, 133 Stat. 2534 (2019).                    

Gene L. Dodaro,

Comptroller General of the United States.

[FR Doc. 2022-06452 Filed 4-1-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1610-02-P
1

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY

AND POLLUTION PREVENTION

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

CERTIFIED MAIL

Return Receipt Requested

Registrant Contact Name: Steven E. Rogosheske for Chem-Tech LTD.

Address: 4515 Fleur Dr. #303

Address: Des Moines, IA 50321

Subject: Notice of Intent to Suspend, FIFRA Sections 3(c)(2)(B) and 4(g)(2)(B).

Dear Mr. Rogosheske:

On_______, the Agency issued a Notice of Intent to Suspend (NOITS) pursuant to FIFRA 

Section 3(c)(2)(B) affecting the following product: Dy-Fly 1 Livestock Spray (EPA Reg. No. 

47000-19). The basis for the Agency’s action was set forth in the NOITS, which subsequently 

became a final and effective Suspension Order affecting the aforementioned product 

registration(s) and has remained a final and effective Suspension Order to date.

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please address them to Moana Appleyard at 

(703)308-8175.

Sincerely yours,

Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., Director

 Pesticide Re-evaluation Division
No. 11-10304.

#### Jones *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
EX-4.7



 Exhibit 4.7 

[FIRST CITIZENS BANC CORP. LETTERHEAD] 

March 14, 2014                     

Securities and Exchange Commission 
 100 F Street, NE 

Washington, DC 20549 
  

	Re:	First Citizens Banc Corp. Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 

 Ladies and Gentlemen:

 First Citizens Banc Corp., an Ohio corporation (FCBC), is today filing an Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013
(the Form 10-K), as executed on March 14, 2014. 
 Pursuant to the instructions relating to the Exhibits in Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K,
FCBC hereby agrees to furnish the Commission, upon request, copies of instruments and agreements defining the rights of holders of its long-term debt and of the long-term debt of its consolidated subsidiaries, which are not being filed as exhibits
to the Form 10-K. None of such long-term debt exceeds 10% of the total assets of FCBC and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. 
  

	
	Very truly yours,
	
	/s/ James O. Miller
	James O. Miller
	President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 35 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 35

To require the posting of the Ten Commandments in the House and Senate 
                               chambers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 1997

 Mr. Stearns submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
To require the posting of the Ten Commandments in the House and Senate 
                               chambers.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. POSTING AND DISPLAY.

    The Ten Commandments shall be prominently posted for display in the 
chambers of the House of Representatives and the Senate of the United 
States.
                                 <all>
```
#### Timothy Neal MCKINLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Tracy MCCOLLUM, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-6097

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Filed February 2, 2018

(D.C. No. 5:16-CV-00126-R) (W.D. Oklahoma)

Timothy Neal McKinley, Pro Se

Jay Sehniederjan, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, for Respondent-Appellee

Before PHILLIPS, McKAY, and McHUGH, Circuit Judges. '

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY *

Monroe G. McKay, Circuit Judge

Petitioner, a pro se state prisoner, seeks a certificate of appealability to appeal the district court’s denial of his § 2264 petition. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1). In his habeas petition, Petitioner raised numerous issues relating to the sufficiency of the evidence, the representation he received at trial and on appeal, and several allegedly prejudicial evidentiary determinations. The district court’s twelve-page order, which adopted much of the magistrate judge’s thirty-five-page second supplemental report and recommendation, considered each of the asserted issues and determined that Petitioner was not entitled to federal habeas relief on any of these grounds.

To obtain a certificate of appealability, Petitioner must make “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). In order to meet this burden, he must demonstrate “that reasonable jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the petition should have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.” *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000) (internal quotation marks omitted).

After carefully reviewing Petitioner’s brief, the district court’s disposition, the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, and the record on appeal, including the transcripts, rulings, and other records from the state court proceedings, we see *350no error in the district court’s exhaustive order, to which we have nothing to add. We accordingly conclude that reasonable jurists would not debate the district court’s denial of Petitioner’s claims. For substantially the reasons given by the district court and magistrate judge, we DENY Petitioner’s request for a certificate of ap-pealability and' DISMISS the appeal. We GRANT Petitioner’s motion to proceed *forma pauperis.*

*

 This order is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel, It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
No. 11-1287.

#### Jackson *v.*International Fiber Corp.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-1047.

#### Strong *v.*Community State Bank et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### IN RE: CAPITAL OPTIONS, LLC, Debtor, Capital Options, LLC, Appellant, v. C. Dennis Loomis; Baker Hostetler, LLP, Appellees.

No. 16-60052

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted October 17, 2017 San Francisco, California

Filed January 10, 2018

H. Lee Horner, Jr., Esquire, Goldstein, Horner & Horner, Cortaro, AZ, for Appellant

Steven D. Jerome, Attorney, Snell *&*Wilmer L.L.P., Phoenix, AZ, for Appellees

Before: WALLACE, CALLAHAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

This is an appeal from the Bankruptcy Court’s dismissal of claims by Capital Options, LLC (Capital) against an attorney, C, Dennis Loomis, and his law firm, Baker Hostetler LLP (collectively Loomis). Capital alleged that it had an interest in another organization, G2, LLC (G2), and that Loomis was a trustee of G2 funds and thus had a non-waivable fiduciary duty to Capital. The Bankruptcy Court, having dismissed Capital’s underlying adversary proceeding in which it asserted its interest in G2, dismissed Capital’s complaint against Loomis, We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d)(1), and affirm.

A grant of a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissal is reviewed de novo. *Coto Settlement v. Eisenberg,*593 F.3d 1031, 1034 (9th Cir. 2010); *see also In re Tracht Gut, LLC,*836 F.3d 1146, 1150 (9th Cir. 2016) (“A motion to dismiss in an adversary bankruptcy proceeding is governed by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7012(b), which incorporates Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)-(i)”). However, underlying factual findings are reviewed for clear error. *In re Retz,*606 F.3d 1189, 1196 (9th Cir. 2010).

*481In a contemporaneously filed memorandum disposition in *In re Capital Options, LLC,*No. 15-60054, we affirm the Bankruptcy Court’s dismissal of Capital’s related adversary proceeding. Accordingly, as Capital has failed to demonstrate an interest in G2, it has failed to show that Loom-is, as a trustee of the G2 funds, has any fiduciary duty to it. The Bankruptcy Court’s dismissal of Capital’s claims against Loomis is AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Christopher PECK Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-2147

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: December 28, 2017

Filed: January 9, 2018

James J. Kelleher, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Springfield, MO, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Christopher Peck, Pro Se

Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

*407PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, Christopher Peck challenges the sentence the district court1 imposed following his guilty plea to child pornography charges. His counsel has moved to withdraw and submitted a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct, 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), discussing the reasonableness of the sentence.

We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion, as it properly considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors; there was no indication that it overlooked a relevant factor, or committed -a clear error of judgment in weighing relevant factors, see United States v. David, 682 F.3d 1074, 1077 (8th Cir. 2012) (standard of review); United States v. Wohlman, 651 F.3d 878, 887 (8th Cir. 2011); and the sentence was within the Guidelines range, see United States v. Callaway, 762 F.3d 754, 760 (8th Cir. 2014). Furthermore, we have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal.

Accordingly, wé grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm.

1

. The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 104 Considered and Passed House (CPH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 104

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1998, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 9, 1997

  Mr. Livingston introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1998, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That section 106(3) of Public 
Law 105-46 is further amended by striking ``November 9, 1997'' and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``November 10, 1997'', and each provision 
amended by sections 122 and 123 of such public law shall be applied as 
if ``November 10, 1997'' was substituted for ``October 23, 1997''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 257 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 257

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

              Providing for an Adjournment of both Houses.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 257

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Wednesday, April 
1, 1998, it stand adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Tueday, April 21, 1998, 
or until noon on the second day after Members are notified to 
reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns 
at the close of business on Thursday, April 2, 1998, Friday, April 3, 
1998, Saturday, April 4, 1998, or Sunday, April 5, 1998, pursuant to a 
motion made by the Majority Leader, or his designee, in accordance with 
this concurrent resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon 
on Monday, April 20, 1998, or such time on that day as may be specified 
by the Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to recess or 
adjourn, or until noon on the second day after Members are notified to 
reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 1, 1998.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          21,957
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,982
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,939
<PP&E>                                          10,501
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,363
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,077
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          306,669
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    210,000
<COMMON>                                       349,831
<OTHER-SE>                                   (833,423)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,077
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   362
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (60,734)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (60,734)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   9,966
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (50,768)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

 

The undersigned, Sterling H. McDonald, Vice-Presidentand Chief Financial Officer of Evolution Petroleum Corporation (the “Company”),certifies in connection with the filing with the Securities and ExchangeCommission of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, tohis knowledge, that:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed thiscertification as of the 14th day of February, 2008.

 
|        | /s/ STERLING H. MCDONALD                   |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Sterling H. McDonald                       |
|   | Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Evolution Petroleum Corporation andwill be retained by Evolution Petroleum Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certificate is being furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to this Form 10-Qand shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.

 

----
No. 11-10209.

#### Zakrzewski *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.