alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Broadcaster, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Martin Wade, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| | 
| |  | /s/ MARTINWADEIII      
| |  | Martin Wade, III,      
| |  | Chief Executive Officer



Date:  February 14, 2007



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 262

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 13, 1998

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the 1998 District of Columbia Special Olympics

Law Enforcement Torch Run to be run through the

Capitol Grounds.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),
2

HCON 262 RDS

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF D.C. SPECIAL

2 OLYMPICS LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN

3 THROUGH CAPITOL GROUNDS.

4 On May 29, 1998, or on such other date as the

5 Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Commit6 tee on Rules and Administration of the Senate may jointly

7 designate, the 1998 District of Columbia Special Olympics

8 Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution referred

9 to as the ‘‘event’’) may be run through the Capitol

10 Grounds, as part of the journey of the Special Olympics

11 torch to the District of Columbia Special Olympics sum12 mer games at Gallaudet University in the District of Co13 lumbia.

14 SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

15 The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as

16 may be necessary to carry out the event.

17 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARA18 TIONS.

19 The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions

20 for physical preparations for the event.

21 SEC. 4. APPLICABILITY OF PROHIBITIONS.

22 Nothing in this resolution may be construed to waive

23 the applicability of the prohibitions established by section

24 4 of the Act of July 31, 1946 (40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat.
3

HCON 262 RDS

1 718), concerning sales, displays, and solicitations on the

2 Capitol Grounds.

Passed the House of Representatives May 12, 1998.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3



                  CONSENT OF HAM, LANGSTON & BREZINA, L.L.P.

     We hereby consent to the use in the Prospectus constituting part of the
Registration Statement on Form S-4 of Houston American Energy Corp. ("HAEC") of
our report dated July 17, 2001 relating to the financial statements of Texas
Nevada Oil & Gas Co. We also consent to all references to us in such Prospectus
including references to us as an expert.

                                             HAM, LANGSTON & BREZINA, L.L.P.


                                             /s/ Ham, Langston & Brezina, L.L.P.



Houston, Texas
November 5, 2001
H. Con. Res. 66 Agreed to May 14, 1997

One Hundred Fifth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-seven

Concurrent Resolution

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the sixteenth annual National

Peace Officers’ Memorial Service.

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL PEACE OFFICERS’ MEMORIAL SERVICE.

The National Fraternal Order of Police and its auxiliary shall

be permitted to sponsor a public event, the sixteenth annual

National Peace Officers’ Memorial Service, on the Capitol Grounds

on May 15, 1997, or on such other date as the Speaker of the

House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the

Senate may jointly designate, in order to honor the more than

117 law enforcement officers who died in the line of duty during

1996.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

(a) IN GENERAL.—The event authorized to be conducted on

the Capitol Grounds under section 1 shall be free of admission

charge to the public and arranged not to interfere with the needs

of Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect

of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board.

(b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The National Fraternal Order

of Police and its auxiliary shall assume full responsibility for all

expenses and liabilities incident to all activities associated with

the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

(a) STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.—Subject to the approval of

the Architect of the Capitol, the National Fraternal Order of Police

and its auxiliary are authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds

such stage, sound amplification devices, and other related structures

and equipment, as may be required for the event authorized to

be conducted on the Capitol Grounds under section 1.
H. Con. Res. 66—2

(b) ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.—The Architect of the Capitol

and the Capitol Police Board are authorized to make any such

additional arrangements as may be required to carry out the event.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
<PAGE>

                   CONSENT OF H. J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.


  We hereby consent to the use of the name H.J. Gruy and Associates, Inc. and of
references to H.J. Gruy and Associates, Inc. and to the inclusion of and
references to our report, or information contained therein, dated February 11,
2002, prepared for Torch Energy Advisors Incorporated in the Torch Energy
Royalty Trust Annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.

                                  H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
                                  Texas Registration Number F-000637


                                  By:  /s/ Sylvia Castilleja
                                       ---------------------
                                       Sylvia Castilleja
                                       Vice President

Houston, Texas
March 25, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR PRONET INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,817
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,304
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,115
<INVENTORY>                                      2,505
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,306
<PP&E>                                         141,350
<DEPRECIATION>                                  65,845
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 307,191
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,698
<BONDS>                                        170,226
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           130
<OTHER-SE>                                     101,137
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   307,191
<SALES>                                         58,992
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                58,992
<CGS>                                            7,183
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,534
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                61,238
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,756
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (33,399)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       167
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (33,566)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (33,566)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.66)
        

</TABLE>
No. 11-1233.

#### Torain *v.*Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.

App. Ct. Ill., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statement of operations, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1999
<CASH>                                         130,256
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,883,484
<ALLOWANCES>                                   150,260
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,040,974
<PP&E>                                         546,316
<DEPRECIATION>                                 169,545
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 16,770,195
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          14,314,445
<BONDS>                                        102,673
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       14,879
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,338,198
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   16,770,195
<SALES>                                        11,835,024
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               11,835,024
<CGS>                                          7,796,902
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,086,055
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             408,508
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,456,441)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (283,600)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,172,840)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,172,840)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.08)




</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            61,885
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       6,085
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  67,970
<CASH>                                          43,452
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               4,527
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           3,775
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 165,535
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 50,912
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             20,786
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,700
<OTHER-SE>                                      75,375
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   165,535
<PREMIUMS>                                      24,787
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              4,361
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     413
<BENEFITS>                                      13,463
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      7,060
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             6,858
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,180
<INCOME-TAX>                                       480
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  43,385
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             12,554
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               1,324
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                12,629
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 41,986
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0604

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

PRESTON CSOO ROSSBACH,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to 

produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing, Court 

Reporter Katie Oman is granted an extension of time to and including 

August 2, 2021, within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts 

requested on appeal.

The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court 

and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 22 2021

03/22/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0604
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Powerhouse Technologies Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard Liebman, Vice President Finance Operations (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: December 14, 2005


/s/ Richard Liebman
---------------- -------------------------
Richard Liebman
Interim Chief Financial Officer
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
                                                                              26
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Fell C.
Herdeg, Chief Financial Officer, of Trudy Corporation do hereby certify, to the
best of my knowledge that:

     1)  The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
         September 30, 2007, being filed with the Securities and Exchange
         Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
         amended; and

     2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

This Certification accompanies this Form 10-QSB as an exhibit, but shall not be
deemed as having been filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or as a separate disclosure document of the Company or the
certifying officer.


                                       TRUDY CORPORATION
                                       (REGISTRANT)

Date: November 19, 2007                By: /s/ Fell C. Herdeg
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Fell C. Herdeg,
                                           Chief Financial Officer



                                  Page 34 of 34
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6536 

To prohibit the employment of school bus drivers with serious moving 

violations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 30, 2016 

Ms. MENG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To prohibit the employment of school bus drivers with serious 

moving violations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No School Bus Drivers 

5 with DUIs Act of 2016’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITED EMPLOYMENT OF SCHOOL BUS DRIV7 ERS WITH SERIOUS MOVING VIOLATIONS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subpart 2 of part F of title VIII 

9 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6536 IH

1 (20 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end 

2 the following: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 8549D. PROHIBITED EMPLOYMENT OF SCHOOL BUS 

4 DRIVERS WITH SERIOUS MOVING VIOLA5 TIONS. 

6 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—No State, State educational 

7 agency, or local educational agency that receives funds 

8 made available by this Act may employ an individual as 

9 a school bus driver if that individual has been convicted 

10 of, or pled guilty to, drunk driving or a driving violation 

11 that is a felony under State law. 

12 ‘‘(b) PROHIBITION.—The Secretary shall not have 

13 the authority to mandate, direct, or control the specific 

14 measures adopted by a State, State educational agency, 

15 or local educational agency pursuant to this section. 

16 ‘‘(c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec17 tion shall be construed to prevent a State, State edu18 cational agency, or local education agency from adopting 

19 a law, regulation, or policy that provides greater or addi20 tional protections prohibiting the employment of a school 

21 employee, contractor, or agent.’’. 

22 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—The table of con23 tents in section 2 of the Elementary and Secondary Edu24 cation Act of 1965 is amended by inserting after the item 

25 related to section 8549C the following: 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6536 IH

‘‘Sec. 8549D. Prohibited employment of school bus drivers with serious moving 

violations.’’. 

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this Act shall take effect on the date that is 2 years after 

3 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
No. 11-10206.

#### Chavez-Trevino *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th

Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION Ill 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

The Honorable Robert M. Summers Secretary, Maryland Department ofthe Environment 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore, Maryland 21230

Dear Secretary Summers: 

### JAN 021013

On December 31,2012, the U.S. Enviromnental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP revision was submitted to address infrastructure elements (A)-(M) of Section 11 O(a)(2) ofthe Clean Air Act (CAA) which are necessary to implement, maintain, and enforce the 2008 ozone National Ambient Air QuaHty Standards (NAAQS) in Maryland. EPA has determined that the submittal is complete for these clements. ·
Tfmembcrs ofyour staffhave any questions, they may direct them toMs. Ruth Knapp, Office ofAir Program Planning, at (2J 5) 814-2191. Sincerely,

# UX·\..,~C'\_**~** Diana Esher, Director Air Protection Division

cc: George (Tad) S. Aburn, Jr., Director, Air And Radiation Management Administration 

### DianaFranks, M£mager, Air Quality Planning Program

Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7659
DARREN HENDERSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DENNIS BIDWELL, Warden; UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-97-2521-WMN) Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 14, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Darren Brett Hende rson, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United States Attorney, Larry David Adams, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition, and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the districtcourt's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Henderson v. Bidwell , No. CA-97-2521-WMN (D. Md. Oct. 24, 31, and Nov. 12, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 11-1319.

#### Controlotron Corp. *v.*Siemens Industry, Inc.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.