alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Baltazar CARILLO-ROMERO, also known as Baltazar Carillo Romero, Petitioner v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent

No. 17-60240 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 16, 2018

Jaesa Woods McLin, Nicole Tamilyn Bowyer, Riguer Silva, L.L.C., Kenner, LA, for Petitioner

Kevin James Conway, Esq., Andrew Jacob Oliveira, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Baltazar Carillo-Romero, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions this court for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision dismissing his appeal of the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b. He contends that the BIA erred in concluding that he failed to establish that his United States citizen daughter would suffer exceptional and extremely unusual hardship as a result of his removal to Mexico. Specifically, Carillo-Romero argues that the BIA abused its discretion by failing to consider his lack of ties to Mexico given the length of his residency in the United States. He also argues that the BIA violated his procedural due process rights by failing to consider all of his testimony in the aggregate.

We are statutorily barred from reviewing the BIA’s purely discretionary denial of cancellation of removal. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); *Sattani v. Holder,*749 F.3d 368, 372 (5th Cir. 2014). This jurisdiction-stripping provision does not preclude review of constitutional claims or questions of law. § 1252(a)(2)(D); *Sattani,*749 F.3d at 372. However, we look past an alien’s framing of an issue and will decline to consider “an abuse of discretion argument cloaked in constitutional garb.” *Hadwani v. Gonzales,*445 F.3d 798, 801 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks, citation, and brackets omitted).

Carillo-Romero’s claim that the BIA failed to properly consider and cumulatively assess all of the exceptional and extremely unusual hardship factors is nothing more than a disagreement with the BIA’s weighing of those factors. Further, the IJ’s and BIA’s decisions reflect that they meaningfully considered all of the relevant hardship factors and evidence, individually and cumulatively. Because Caril-lo-Romero challenges the consideration and weighing of the evidence, wé lack jurisdiction over his claim that the BIA erred in dismissing his appeal of the IJ’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal. *See Sattani,*749 F.3d at 372.

*450Accordingly, Carillo-Romero’s petition for review is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement of
Imperial Sugar Company on Form S-8 of our report dated December 31, 2002,
appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Imperial Sugar Company for the
year ended September 30, 2002. We also consent to the reference to us in the
fourth paragraph of Part II, Item 3 (Incorporation of Certain Documents by
Reference) which is a part of this Registration Statement.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Houston, Texas

January 31, 2003
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 131

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the ocean.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 29, 1997

Mr. SAXTON (for himself and Mr. ABERCROMBIE) submitted the following

concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the ocean.

Whereas the ocean comprises nearly three quarters of the

surface of the Earth;

Whereas the ocean contains diverse species of fish and other

living organisms which form the largest ecosystem on

Earth;

Whereas these living marine resources provide important food

resources to the United States and the world, and

unsustainable use of these resources has unacceptable

economic, environmental, and cultural consequences;

Whereas the ocean and sea floor contain vast energy and

mineral resources which are critical to the economy of the

United States and the world;

Whereas the ocean largely controls global weather and climate, and is the ultimate source of all water resources;
2

•HCON 131 IH

Whereas the vast majority of the deep ocean is unexplored

and unknown, and the ocean is truly the last frontier on

Earth for science and civilization;

Whereas the ocean is the common means of transportation

between coastal nations and carries the majority of the

United States foreign trade;

Whereas any nation’s use or misuse of ocean resources has

effects far beyond that nation’s borders; and

Whereas the United Nations has declared 1998 to be the

International Year of the Ocean, and in order to observe

such celebration, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration and other Federal agencies, in cooperation with organizations concerned with ocean science and

marine resources, have resolved to promote exploration,

utilization, conservation, and public awareness of the

ocean: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) the ocean is of paramount importance to

4 the economic future, environmental quality, and na5 tional security of the United States;

6 (2) the United States has a responsibility to ex7 ercise and promote comprehensive stewardship of the

8 ocean and the living marine resources it contains;

9 and

10 (3) the agencies of the United States Govern11 ment, and all other public and private organizations,

12 are encouraged to strive toward a better understand-
3

•HCON 131 IH

1 ing of the ocean, communicate this understanding to

2 the people of the United States, and thereby pro3 mote the exploration of the ocean, the sustainable

4 use of ocean resources, and the conservation of these

5 resources for future generations.

Æ
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 271

Welcoming His Holiness Karekin I, Supreme Patriarch and Catholicos of

All Armenians, upon his visit to the United States, commemorating

the 100th anniversary of the Diocese of the Armenian Church in America, and acknowledging the substantial contributions of Armenian-Americans to society and culture in the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 5, 1998

Mr. PALLONE (for himself and Mr. PORTER) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Welcoming His Holiness Karekin I, Supreme Patriarch and

Catholicos of All Armenians, upon his visit to the United

States, commemorating the 100th anniversary of the Diocese of the Armenian Church in America, and acknowledging the substantial contributions of Armenian-Americans to society and culture in the United States.

Whereas many Armenians have immigrated to, or sought and

received refuge in, the United States to pursue the American dream;

Whereas Armenian-Americans have made important cultural,

political, economic, judicial, and social contributions to

the United States for more than 100 years;
2

•HCON 271 IH

Whereas the Armenian nation was the first nation to embrace

Christianity;

Whereas the Diocese of the Armenian Church in America will

celebrate its centennial during 1998;

Whereas more than 100 communities throughout the United

States will celebrate the centennial with special worship

and ecumenical services;

Whereas in celebration of the centennial, His Holiness

Karekin I, Supreme Patriarch and Catholicos of All Armenians, will visit the United States; and

Whereas the centennial is an appropriate occasion to celebrate the ideals and values shared among the United

States, the Armenian nation, and the Diocese of the Armenian Church in America: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) congratulates the Diocese of the Armenian

4 Church in America on the occasion of its 100th an5 niversary in the United States;

6 (2) welcomes His Holiness Karekin I, Supreme

7 Patriarch and Catholicos of All Armenians, upon his

8 visit to the United States;

9 (3) joins with the Armenian nation, the Diocese

10 of the Armenian Church in America, and His Holi11 ness Karekin I in celebrating the ideals and values

12 they share with the people of the United States; and

13 (4) commends Armenian-Americans for their

14 substantial contributions to society and culture in
3

•HCON 271 IH

1 the United States and for demonstrating the success

2 of the American dream.

Æ
No. 11-9827.

#### Ebeh *v.*Meadow Burke Products et al.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 282

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To correct the enrollment of H.R. 2400.
★

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 282

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 2400

3 the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make the

4 following corrections:
2

•HCON 282 EH1S

1 (1) In the table contained in section 1602 of

2 the bill—

3 (A) strike item 166, relating to Macomb

4 County, Michigan, and insert the following:

No. State Project description [Dollars in

Millions]

166. Michigan ........... Improvements to Tenth Street (Port Huron) ................... 1.8;

5 (B) after item 1850 insert the following:

No. State Project description [Dollars in

Millions]

1851. Michigan ........... Bridge-to-Bay bike path, St. Clair County ....................... 0.450;

6 (C) in item 755, relating to Cross Seminole

7 Trail, Florida, strike ‘‘1.25’’ and insert ‘‘1.5’’;

8 (D) in item 902, relating to St. Johns

9 River Bridge, Florida, strike ‘‘10.5’’ and insert

10 ‘‘14.0’’

11 (E) by striking item 242, relating to mag12 netic lane marking for I–4, Florida, and item

13 1065, relating to US 1792 in Volusia County,

14 Florida;

15 (F) in item 702, relating to I–4 in Or16 lando, Florida, by striking ‘‘10.5’’ and insert

17 ‘‘10.0’’;

18 (G) in item 770, relating to US–17/92 in

19 Volusia County, Florida, striking ‘‘1.35’’ and

20 insert ‘‘1.0’’;
3

•HCON 282 EH1S

1 (H) in item 789, relating to construction

2 of interchange, Orange County, Florida, strike

3 ‘‘2.0625’’ and insert ‘‘1.0’’;

4 (I) in item 635, relating to Florida Na5 tional Scenic Trail, strike ‘‘1.875’’ and insert

6 ‘‘2.15’’; and

7 (J) in item 1383, relating to improvements

8 to Alden Road, Florida, strike ‘‘0.525’’ and in9 sert ‘‘0.35’’; and

10 (2) On page 1A–71, line 22, insert after system

11 ‘‘$10,000,000 of such amounts shall be available to

12 the state of Alabama for fiscal years 1999 and

13 2000’’; and

14 (3) On page 1B–129, after line 10, insert the

15 following new subsections and redesignate succeed16 ing subsections accordingly:

17 ‘‘(g)(1) The Secretary shall provide $10 million for

18 construction of Highway 323 between Alzada and the vi19 cinity of Ekalaka, Montana.

20 ‘‘(2) Funds authorized by this subsection shall be

21 available for obligation in the same manner as if such

22 funds had been apportioned under chapter 1 of title 23,

23 United States Code.
4

•HCON 282 EH1S

1 ‘‘(h)(1) The Secretary shall provide $1.125 million

2 for construction of Third Street North, CSAH 81, Waite

3 Park.

4 ‘‘(2) Funds authorized by this subsection shall be

5 available for obligation in the same manner as if such

6 funds had been apportioned under chapter 1 of title 23,

7 United States Code.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 22, 1998.

Attest:

Clerk.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 8, 2016

No. 04-16-00418-CR

Antrail Jadaveonte LE MUNERLYN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR3931W

Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Defendant pled nolo contendre to unauthorized use of a vehicle and was sentenced within 

the terms of a plea bargain. Defendant timely filed a general notice of appeal. The trial court’s 

Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal states this “is a plea-bargain case, and the 

defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record contains a 

written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended 

by the prosecutor and agreed to by defendant; therefore, the trial court’s certification accurately 

reflects that defendant’s case is a plea bargain case and defendant does not have a right of appeal. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).

“In a plea bargain case . . . a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were 

raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court's 

permission to appeal.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record does not contain a written 

motion ruled on before trial nor does it indicate the trial court granted defendant permission to 

appeal. This court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the 

right of appeal has not been made a part of the record.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

It is therefore ORDERED this appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Texas Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 25.2(d), unless an amended trial court certification that shows defendant has 

the right of appeal has been made part of the appellate record by August 7, 2016. See Daniels v. 

State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order); TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1. 
All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending our resolution of the certification 

issue.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of July, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 294 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 294

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 30, 1998

        Received and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Commending the Armed Forces for their efforts, leadership, and success 
 in providing equality of treatment and opportunity for their military 
  and civilian personnel without regard to race, color, religion, or 
                            national origin.

Whereas on July 26, 1948, President Truman issued Executive Order 9981 ordering 
        the integration of the Armed Forces;
Whereas the President stated 50 years ago in the executive order that it was 
        ``essential that there be maintained in the armed services of the United 
        States the highest standards of democracy, with equality of treatment 
        and opportunity for all those who serve in our country's defense'';
Whereas in the executive order the President declared that ``there shall be 
        equality of treatment and opportunity for all persons in the armed 
        services without regard to race, color, religion or national origin'';
Whereas, soon after the President issued the executive order, United States 
        forces in Korea were integrated, leading the way to a fully integrated 
        army;
Whereas the Armed Forces have used the implementation and enforcement of the 
        Civil Rights Act of 1964 as additional tools to eliminate discrimination 
        among their military and civilian personnel;
Whereas in 1998 minorities serve in senior leadership positions throughout the 
        Armed Forces, as officers, as senior non-commissioned officers, and as 
        civilian leaders;
Whereas the Armed Forces have demonstrated a continuing commitment to ensuring 
        the equality of treatment and opportunity for all military and civilian 
        personnel of the Armed Forces; and
Whereas the efforts of the Armed Forces to ensure the equality of treatment and 
        opportunity for their personnel have contributed significantly to the 
        advancement of equality of treatment and opportunity for all Americans: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress commends the Armed Forces for their efforts, 
leadership, and success in providing equality of treatment and 
opportunity for their military and civilian personnel without regard to 
race, color, religion, or national origin.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 29, 1998.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Converted by EDGARwiz


Amendment




This is an amendment (“Amendment”) to an agreement (the “Original Agreement”) dated July 17, 2014, by and between  NutraFuels, Inc., a Florida corporation (“NutraFuels”) and Sullivan Media Group, Inc., a Nevada Corporation (“SMG”).  For purposes of this Amendment, references to “Agreement” herein include the Original Agreement and Exhibit A thereto.




Whereas, under the terms of the Agreement, SMG is obligated to provide certain services (“Services”) to NutraFuels and NutraFuels is obligated to pay certain sums to SMG in exchange for the Services.




Whereas, NutraFuels and SMG desire to amend the Agreement, as set more set forth herein.




Now therefore in exchange for good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows:




1. Amendment.   Exhibit A to the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with Exhibit A hereto, which is incorporated herein and made a part hereof.




2. Entire agreement.  The Agreement and this Amendment constitute the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and the foregoing may not be modified, amended, or changed except in writing.  




3. Benefits; binding effect.  This Amendment shall be for the benefit of, and shall be binding upon, the Maker and the Holder and their respective successors and assigns.




4. Headings.  The headings contained herein are for reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of any or all of the provisions hereof.




5. Amendment.  The effect of this Amendment is to amend the Agreement.  This Amendment shall constitute a modification of the terms of the Agreement and except as set forth herein evidences the same obligations, rights and duties that existed under the Agreement.  To the extent that any rights, benefits or provisions existed in the Agreement as of the date hereof, then such rights, benefits or provisions are acknowledged to be and to continue to be effective from and after the date of the Agreement except as amended herein.  All references to the Agreement in any agreement, instrument or document executed or delivered in connection herewith or therewith shall be deemed to refer to the Agreement and this Amendment, as the same may be amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment on July 1st 2015




NutraFuels, Inc.




/s/ Edgar Ward_________________

By: Edgar Ward, President




Sullivan Media Group, Inc.




/s/ Edward Sullivan______________

By: Edward Sullivan, President
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.8

                         Beneficial Owner Election Form

                                  Instructions

     The undersigned acknowledge(s) receipt of your letter and the enclosed
materials referred to therein relating to the offering of shares of common stock
(the "Common Stock") of Harken Energy Corporation (the "Company").

     This will instruct you whether to exercise Rights to purchase shares of the
Company's Common Stock distributed with respect to the shares of the Company's
Common Stock held by you for the account of the undersigned, pursuant to the
terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Prospectus and the related
"Instructions as to Use of Harken Energy Corporations Rights Certificates."

     Box 1. [_]  Please DO NOT EXERCISE RIGHTS for shares of Common Stock.

     Box 2. [_]  Please EXERCISE RIGHTS for shares of Common Stock as set
                 forth below.

                              Number of         Subscription
                               Rights              Price             Payment
                           ---------------   ------------------   -------------
Subscription Right                         x                    =

     Box 3. [_]  Payment in the following amount is enclosed $_____________.
                 (This amount must equal the amount set forth under "Payment"
                 above).

     Box 4. [_]  Please deduct payment from the following account maintained by
                 you as follows:

___________________________________      _______________________________________
          Type of Account                              Account No.

                                         $______________________________________
                                         _______________________________________
                                         _______________________________________
                                         Signature(s)

                                         Please type or print name(s) below:
                                         _______________________________________
                                         _______________________________________

Date: ______________, 2002

                                        1
# Official Journal C 410A/18 N

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 410A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5718 November 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 410A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5718 November 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Medicines Agency |
| 2014/C 410A/01 | Recruitment for the European Medicines Agency (London) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Medicines Agency

2014/C 410A/01

Recruitment for the European Medicines Agency (London)

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2014/C 410A/02 | Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals | 2 |

2014/C 410A/02

Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals

2

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN