alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|US
    Bank(logo) | All
    of us serving you
|----------------- | -------------------------





Annual Statement of Compliance

GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2014-GC26



VIA EMAIL



To Addresses on Exhibit
A:



Re:       GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2014-GC26, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-GC26 (the
“Trust”), issued pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2014 (the “Agreement”),
by and among GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, as Depositor, U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator
and Trustee, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNR
Partners, LLC, as General Special Servicer, and CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Cypresswood Court Shopping Center Special Servicer





I,
Kimberly O. Jacobs, a Senior Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator, hereby certify that:



(1)
A review of the activities of the Certificate Administrator during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”)
and of the performance of the Certificate Administrator under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and



(2)
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certificate Administrator has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
in all material respects throughout such Reporting Period.



Capitalized terms used but not
defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.



Date: March 7, 2017



|U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator
|------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                            
|By:                                                         
|                                                            
|                                                            















|US
    Bank(logo) | All
    of us serving you
|----------------- | -------------------------



Exhibit A





GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II

200 West Street

New York, New York 10282-2198

Attention:GSMS
2014-GC26

leah.nivison@gs.com,



Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

375 Park Avenue, 2nd Floor

J0127-023,

New York, New York 10152

Attention: GSMS 2014-GC26

cts.sec.notifications@wellsfargo.com,



Wells Fargo Bank, National Association

9062 Old Annapolis Road,

Columbia, Maryland 21045

Attention: GSMS 2014-GC26



Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

390 Greenwich Street, 5thFloor,

New York, New York 10013,

Attention: GSMS 2014-GC26

ryan.m.oconnor@citi.com



Citibank, N.A.

388 Greenwich Street, 14thFloor

New York, New York 10013

Attention: Citibank Agency & Trust - GSMS 2014-GC26

john.hannon@citi.com
#### Silvester Allen THOMAS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director of the DOC, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-7415

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 22, 2018

Decided: February 27, 2018

Silvester Allen Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin Hyman Katz, Assistant Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Silvester Allen Thomas seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

*338We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Thomas has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Thomas leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
#### Jeremy James HENDRICKS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Matt BINGHAM; Peter Keim, Defendants-Appellees

No. 17-40144 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 19, 2017

Jeremy James Hendricks, Pro Se

Thomas Phillip Brandt, Stephen Douglas Henninger, John David Husted, Fanning Harper Martinson Brandt & Kutchin, P.C., Dallas, TX, for Defendants-Appellees

Before BARKSDALE, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jeremy James Hendricks, Texas prisoner # 01491333 and proceeding *pro se,*challenges the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action (claiming a due-process violation) as barred by *Heck v. Humphrey,*512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994), and, in the alternative, by the doctrines of qualified and absolute immunity. Hendricks does not present any bases challenging the court’s ruling his due-process claim is barred under *Heck.*His failure to point to any error in the court’s reasoning puts him in the same position as if he had not appealed the judgment. *E.g.,*
      *835
      *Brinkmann v. Dallas Cty. Deputy Sheriff Abner,*813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). This court liberally construes briefs filed by *pro se*litigants, but even *pro se*parties must reasonably comply with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 28(a)(8). *E.g., Yohey*v. *Collins,*985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993).

In the alternative, in his reply brief, in addressing appellees’ contentions regarding qualified and absolute immunity, Hendricks fails to brief any bases challenging the court’s alternative conclusion that the district attorney and assistant district attorney, involved in Hendricks’ prosecution for sexual assault of a child, were entitled to such' immunity. Accordingly, he has abandoned this issue. *Brinkmann,*813 F.2d at 748.

AFFIRMED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
# Official Journal C 128/2017

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 128 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6022 April 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 128

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6022 April 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 128/01 | Communication in accordance with Article 34(7)(a)(iii) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, on decisions relating to binding information issued by the customs authorities of the Member States concerning the classification of goods in the customs nomenclature | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 128/01

Communication in accordance with Article 34(7)(a)(iii) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, on decisions relating to binding information issued by the customs authorities of the Member States concerning the classification of goods in the customs nomenclature

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 128/02 | Euro exchange rates | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 128/02

Euro exchange rates

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 128/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8401 — Johnson & Johnson/Actelion) (
  1
  ) | 4 |
| 2017/C 128/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8287 — Nordic Capital/Intrum Justitia AB) (
  1
  ) | 5 |
| 2017/C 128/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8410 — Zen-Noh/LDC/Amaggi/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 6 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 128/06 | Information notice — Public consultation — Geographical indication from Armenia | 7 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2017/C 128/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8401 — Johnson & Johnson/Actelion) (
  1
  )

1

4

2017/C 128/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8287 — Nordic Capital/Intrum Justitia AB) (
  1
  )

1

5

2017/C 128/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8410 — Zen-Noh/LDC/Amaggi/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

6

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2017/C 128/06

Information notice — Public consultation — Geographical indication from Armenia

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,198
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,602
<ALLOWANCES>                                       629
<INVENTORY>                                      3,813
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,550
<PP&E>                                          10,140
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,698
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,685
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,040
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,118
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,995
<SALES>                                          9,838
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,838
<CGS>                                            7,221
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,221
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,451
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    44
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  39
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,191
<INCOME-TAX>                                       107
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,028
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        (201)
<NET-INCOME>                                       827
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 31 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 31

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 6, 1997

     Received and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the display of the Ten 
Commandments by Judge Roy S. Moore, a judge on the circuit court of the 
                           State of Alabama.

Whereas Judge Roy S. Moore, a lifelong resident of Etowah County, Alabama, 
        graduate of the United States Military Academy with distinguished 
        service to his country in Vietnam, and graduate of the University of 
        Alabama School of Law, has served his country and his community with 
        uncommon distinction;
Whereas another circuit judge in Alabama, has ordered Judge Moore to remove a 
        copy of the Ten Commandments posted in his courtroom and the Alabama 
        Supreme Court has granted a stay to review the matter;
Whereas the Ten Commandments have had a significant impact on the development of 
        the fundamental legal principles of Western Civilization; and
Whereas the Ten Commandments set forth a code of moral conduct, observance of 
        which is universally acknowledged to promote respect for our system of 
        laws and the good of society: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) the Ten Commandments are a declaration of fundamental 
        principles that are the cornerstones of a fair and just 
        society; and
            (2) the public display, including display in government 
        offices and courthouses, of the Ten Commandments should be 
        permitted.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 5, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Iran ZAVALA, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-11311 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 20, 2017

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Iran Zavala, Pro Se

Before JONES, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Iran Zavala has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Zavala has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo-lous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the AP*838PEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47,5, the court has determined that this opinion should not he published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
**Exhibit 31.1** **Certification of CEO Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act**
 **Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 as Adopted Pursuant to** **Section 302 of the**
 **Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
  I, Brian P. Burns, certify that:
   1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of BF Enterprises, Inc.;
   2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
   3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
   4.  The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
   (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
   (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
   (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and
   1    5.  The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
   (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
   (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.
  
 BF ENTERPRISES, INC.Date: November 12, 2004
By:
/s/  Brian P. BurnsChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
  2
#### ZKEY INVESTMENTS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. FACEBOOK, INC., Defendant-Appellee

2017-1429

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

January 10, 2018

Michael F. Heim, Heim, Payne *&*Cho-rush, LLP, Houston, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by Robert Allan Bullwinkel, Eric J. Enger; Amir H. Alavi, Demetrios Anaipakos, Ahmad, Zavit-sanos, Anaipakos, Alavi & Mensing PC, Houston, TX.

Heidi Lyn Keefe, Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by Mark R. Weinstein.

(Dyk, Moore, and Wallach, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause .having been , heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
1

Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 9:55 AM

To: 'lipocharge@gmail.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Information - ESRUAS, LLC

Dear Mr. Brett E. Lisa:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA‐2015‐

0860).  This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

•             Describe the aircraft makes, models, and types (i.e., fixed wing, rotorcraft, lighter than air) for the proposed UAS

operation.  The descriptions should include the maximum weight (including payload).  This information can be located in

the aircraft manuals.

•             Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order

8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1.  If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closed set filming

from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov.  If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 7/24/2015.  If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267‐9521.

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202‐267‐9521
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                       Consent of Independent Accountants

     We hereby consent to the use in this Amendment No. 2 to Registration
Statement on Form S-4 of our report dated November 20, 2002 relating to the
financial statements of Hanover Equipment Trust 2001B, which appears in such
Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading
"Experts" in such Registration Statement.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas
November 25, 2002
<PAGE>   1

                 Exhibit 11 - Computation of Earnings per Share

The following tabulation presents the calculation of primary and fully diluted
earnings per common share for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 1998
and 1997:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       NINE MONTHS ENDED  Nine Months Ended
                                                      SEPTEMBER 30, 1998  September 30, 1997
                                                      ------------------  ------------------
<S>                                                   <C>                 <C>          
Reported net income (loss)                               $    162,865       $   (253,769)
                                                         ============       ============
Earnings (loss) on common shares                         $    162,865       $   (253,769)
                                                         ============       ============
Weighted average common shares outstanding                    679,048            679,048
                                                         ============       ============
Income (loss) per common share - basic and diluted
Income (loss) from continuing operations                 $        .24       $       (.37)
                                                         ============       ============
Net income (loss)                                        $        .24       $       (.37)
                                                         ============       ============
</TABLE>


                                       21