alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                   34,170
<SECURITIES>                             10,799
<RECEIVABLES>                             4,806
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                               1,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         51,286
<PP&E>                                    4,004
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           55,985
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     5,492
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                    126
<OTHER-SE>                               67,589
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             55,985
<SALES>                                   6,112
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          6,112
<CGS>                                     1,412
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             1,412
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (8,747)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 30
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (8,777)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                             (8,777)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             (0.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (0.72)
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15D0340. LARRY BOYD v. THE STATE.

Larry Boyd was convicted of armed robbery in 1994, and we affirmed his

conviction in an unpublished opinion. Boyd v. State, 219 Ga. App. XXVI (1995).

Boyd subsequently filed two motions to vacate, set aside, modify or correct his

sentence. The trial court denied the motions, and we dismissed one appeal and

affirmed the other.1

In this latest appeal, Boyd has filed an application for

discretionary appeal, seeking to appeal the trial court’s order denying yet another

motion to correct void sentence. As such order is directly appealable, this Court

ordinarily would grant the application in accordance with OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). 

However, the application must still be timely. 

Here, Boyd was required to file his application within 30 days after the entry

of the appealable order, and this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider an untimely

application.

2 However, although Boyd included with his March 27, 2015 application

materials a copy of the trial court’s order, signed on February 20, it was not a stamped

“filed” copy as required by Court of Appeals Rule 31 (e). A stamped “filed” copy is

required in order for this Court to ascertain that the application was filed within 30

days after entry of the appealable order. On March 31, 2015 this Court ordered Boyd

to supplement his application within 10 days with a stamped “filed” copy of the order

1 Boyd v. State, 253 Ga. App. 238 (558 SE2d 787) (2002); Boyd v. State, Case

No. A05A1332 (August 5, 2005). 

2 See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d); Hill v. State, 204 Ga. App. 582 (420 SE2d 393)

(1992).

April 24, 2015
to be appealed. We noted that failure to comply with this directive would result in

dismissal of the application. On April 14, 2015, Boyd submitted another copy of the

order at issue, but it also is not stamped “filed.” Thus, Boyd has not filed a stamped

“filed” copy of the order within the additional time allowed. Accordingly, this

application is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

04/24/2015
**MEMORANDUM**

**DATE:** 07 /31 /2014 **FROM:** Laura Farris/EPA Region 8 **TO:** Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR– 2013 - 0602 **SUBJECT:** Tribal Consultation on 111d held on 07/18 /2014 **SUMMARY :**  On July 18 , 2014, EPA Headquarters led a Tribal Consultation via conference call on the proposed Clean Power Plan for E xisting Power . The Ute Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation , the Crow Tribe of Indians , and an a ttorney for the MHA Nation (Three Affiliated Tribes) participated. The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES:** See attached.
From: Andrew Lee To: TSAI, YA-TING Cc: Charles Tupac ; Angela Shibata Subject: Morongo Casino Cogeneration Facility Date: Friday, July 29, 2016 3:47:37 PM



### Good afternoon Sheila, I have a question regarding conditions V.A.2 and 3. I noticed that there are no averaging times for these concentration levels nor is there any mention of whether these concentration levels are as is measured basis or if these should be adjusted for moisture, i.e. dry basis.

Hope you have a great weekend.

Best regards, Andrew

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Andrew Lee, P.E. Sr. Air Quality Engineering Manager So. Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 (909) 396-2643
No. 11-1024.

#### City of New Haven, Connecticut *v.*Briscoe.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Exhibit 32

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trudy Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
William W. Burnham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Acting Principal
Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, does hereby certify, pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his
knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                    /s/ William W. Burnham
                                    ---------------------------
                                    William W. Burnham
                                    Principal Executive Officer
                                    Date:  December 22, 2003


                                    /s/ William W. Burnham
                                    ---------------------------
                                    William W. Burnham
                                    Acting Principal Financial Officer
                                    Date:  December 22, 2003

                                       24
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                SUBSIDIARIES OF COTELLIGENT, INC. (THE "COMPANY")
                -------------------------------------------------
                             AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001
                             -----------------------

                                                 State or Other Jurisdiction of
               Subsidiary                        Incorporation of Organization
-----------------------------------------        -------------------------------
Cotelligent USA, Inc.                            California corporation
R. Reed Business Systems Consulting, Inc.        Illinois corporation
CZG Mobile Ventures, Inc.                        Delaware corporation
bSmart.to LLC                                    Delaware Limited Liability
                                                 corporation
Jas Concepts, Inc.                               Pennsylvania corporation
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Tony Tong, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB of PacificNet Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2004 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of PacificNet Inc.

         I, Shao Jian Wang, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB of PacificNet Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2004
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of PacificNet Inc.

         Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, this certificate is being furnished and is not deemed filed.


                                    BY: /S/ TONY TONG
                                        ------------------------------------
                                        TONY TONG
                                        CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                        (PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

                                    BY: /S/ SHAO JIAN WANG
                                        ------------------------------------
                                        SHAO JIAN WANG
                                        CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                        (PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER)

                                    Date: November 15, 2004
**EXHIBIT ITEM 32.1**

**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**

Thecertification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and ExchangeCommission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63of Title 18 of the United States Code.

November10, 2006

CharlesT. Chrietzberg, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of Northern CaliforniaBancorp, Inc. certifies:

a.               thatthis periodic report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

b.              thatinformation contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of NorthernCalifornia Bancorp, Inc.

|        | /s/ Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr.        |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr.            |   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer  and President |   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
COMPANY'S BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1997 AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
(B) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          34,461
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,455
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     80,120
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               272,431
<PP&E>                                         514,720
<DEPRECIATION>                                 159,101
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,111,894
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          749,041
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,530
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,020,487
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,111,894
<SALES>                                        123,184
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               123,184
<CGS>                                            8,068
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,068
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,609,315
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,283
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,505,989)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,505,989)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.60)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1


 





MINUTES OF A SPECIAL
MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS


OF


SHENG YING ENTERTAINMENT CORP.


 


A Special Meeting of the
Board of Directors of Sheng Ying Entertainment Corp., a Nevada corporation, was held by Mr. Thomas Raack, the sole Director on
the 12th day of December, 2017, for the purpose of considering the appointment of a new Director to the Board, and transacting
any other business as may properly come before the meeting.


 


Tom Raack, the sole Director,
called the meeting to order, presided over the meeting and recorded the minutes of the meeting.


 


The reading, correcting
and approval of the minutes of the last meeting was waived by Director Raack.


 


Director Raack considered
the appointment of 1 new Director. He also had a conference with Markus W. Frick and concluded that, based on his education, experience
and know-how in disciplines related to the business of the company, he would be an excellent addition to the Board.


Director Raack then adopted
a resolution whereby it was:


 


RESOLVED that, Markus W. Frick be appointed
as a Director, to serve until his successor is elected and accepts the position.


 


FURTHER RESOLVED that, the officers and
counsel shall take all action and execute any and all documents deemed necessary and appropriate to file and notify regulatory
authorities of this action, and otherwise comply with applicable laws, rules and regulations.


 


There being no further
business to come before the meeting, and upon motion duly made and seconded, the meeting was adjourned.


 


	 	/s/ Tom Raack            
	 	Tom Raack, Chairman of the Board


 


 


 


 




    	 	 	 



     


    


WAIVER OF NOTICE AND CONSENT


 


TO A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS


 


OF


 


SHENG YING ENTERTAINMENT CORP.


 


 


The undersigned, being
the sole Director of the corporation, does hereby consent to and waive notice of the time, place and purpose of a special meeting
of the Directors of Sheng Ying Entertainment Corp., and consents that the meeting may be held by him, in his office in California,
on the 12th day of December, 2017, for purpose of considering the appointment of a new Director to the Board, and transacting any
other business as may properly come before the meeting.


 


 


	 	Dated this 12th of December, 2017
	 	 
	 	 
	 	/s/ Tom Raack               
	 	Thomas Raack, Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Excite,
Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          45,407
<SECURITIES>                                    28,971
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,210
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,815)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               168,417
<PP&E>                                          67,665
<DEPRECIATION>                                (26,314)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 247,036
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,618
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            55
<OTHER-SE>                                     167,114
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   247,036
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                54,085
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,757
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                49,802
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (549)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (863)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,440)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,440)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,440)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

MELISSA JANE (NICHOLS) STEEN v. EVANS HARRINGTON STEEN 

General Sessions Court for Wilson County

No. 4099

No. M2000-00313-COA-R3-CV - Filed June 21, 2001

ORDER

The appellee has filed a Petition for Rehearing. After careful consideration, we deny the

appellee’s petition. Appellee bases his petition on his belief that this court’s opinion is not supported

by the facts of the case and that this court did not properly weigh the trial court’s assessment of the

witnesses’ credibility. This court overturned the decision of the trial court, and held that the mother

should have primary custody of the children. 

The appellee argues that the parents had equal time with the children after the divorce in 1994

except for an eight-week period until the terms under the divorce decree were enforced in 1998. The

evidence in the record shows that the children resided for a majority of the time with their mother.

Although there was evidence that the father spent a great deal of time with the children, the majority

of their sleeping and waking moments were spent in their mother’s care. As we stated in our opinion,

there is a presumption in favor of continuity of placement when all other factors are equal. Placencia

v. Placencia, 3 S.W.3d 497 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). The evidence presented to the trial court showed

all the factors to be equal. Therefore, primary custody should rest with the mother. 

Appellee also argues that this court did not give proper deference to the trial court’s assessment

of witness credibility. The trial court did not discredit the testimony of any witnesses. In fact, the trial

court found that one of the witnesses for the mother was especially credible. 

For these reasons we deny the appellee’s petition for rehearing.

_________________________________________

BEN H. CANTRELL, PRESIDING JUDGE, M.S.

_________________________________________

WILLIAM B. CAIN, JUDGE

_________________________________________

PATRICIA J. COTTRELL, JUDGE
No. 11M115.

#### Galvez *v.*Internal Revenue Service.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
**EXHIBIT ITEM 32.2**

 

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

 

The certification set forth below is beingsubmitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose ofcomplying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode.

 

November9, 2007

 

BruceN. Warner, the Chief Financial Officer of Northern California Bancorp, Inc.certifies:

 

c.               thatthis quarterly report  on Form 10-QSB forthe period ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

d.              thatinformation contained in this Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Northern California Bancorp, Inc.

 

 
|   | /s/ Bruce N. Warner           |   |
|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|   | Bruce N. Warner               |
|   | Chief Financial Officer  and  |
|   | Principal Accounting  Officer |

 

----
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 02, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 02, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15I0125. PAUL J. KEGEL v. LOUISE M. KEGEL .

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

13CV1230