alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from  
consolidated financial statements of Ceramics Process Systems 
Corporation  and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 
10-Q for the period ending March 28, 1998.  
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1998
<CASH>                                         529,026
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  432,977
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    385,847
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,363,171
<PP&E>                                         704,095
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,011,051
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,072,338
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,549,925
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,736,426
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,072,338
<SALES>                                      1,333,214
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,333,214
<CGS>                                          727,807
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  885,764
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              54,633
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                392,817
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,856
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            384,961
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   384,961
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 146 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 146

    Designating the week beginning November 19, 1995, and the week 
 beginning on November 24, 1996, as ``National Family Week'', and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 30 (legislative day, June 19), 1995

Mr. Johnston submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Designating the week beginning November 19, 1995, and the week 
 beginning on November 24, 1996, as ``National Family Week'', and for 
                            other purposes.
Whereas the family is the basic strength of any free and orderly society;
Whereas it is appropriate to honor the family as a unit essential to the 
        continued well-being of the United States; and
Whereas it is fitting that official recognition be given to the importance of 
        family loyalties and ties: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate designates the week beginning on November 
19, 1995, and the week beginning on November 24, 1996, as ``National 
Family Week''. The Senate requests the President to issue a 
proclamation calling on the people of the United States to observe each 
week with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Broadcaster, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Martin Wade, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |                                                                        
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                        
| | /s/ MARTINWADEIII                                                      
| | Martin Wade, III,
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)



Date: November 14, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Official Journal L 237/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 237 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4931 August 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 237

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4931 August 2006

---

| Contents | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Commission |
| | * | Commission Decision of 4 August 2006 approving a Diagnostic Manual for avian influenza as provided for in Council Directive 2005/94/EC
  (notified under document number C(2006) 3477)

   (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

page

Commission

*

Commission Decision of 4 August 2006 approving a Diagnostic Manual for avian influenza as provided for in Council Directive 2005/94/EC
  (notified under document number C(2006) 3477)

   (1)

(notified under document number C(2006) 3477)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zhongchai Machinery, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the “Report”), I, Peter Wang, the President and acting Chief Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 C.F.R. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 12, 2011




By:
/s/ Peter WangPresident and Acting Chief Financial Officer





This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 C.F.R. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Zhongchai Machinery, Inc. and will be retained by Zhongchai Machinery, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32(b)

                                 Certification

           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
        (Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
                              United States Code)

In connection with the Report of Long Island Physician Holdings Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Concetta Pryor, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ CONCETTA PRYOR
-----------------------
Concetta Pryor
Chief Financial Officer
February 4, 2004


This certification accompanies the above-described Report on Form 10-Q pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CPS Technologies Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Grant C. Bennett, President and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:	May 14, 2007
/s/	Grant C. Bennett
Grant C. Bennett
President and Treasurer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of CPS Technologies Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QA for the six month period ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Grant C. Bennett, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and I, Ralph M. Norwood, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:	September 13, 2012
/s/	Grant C. Bennett
Grant C. Bennett
President and Chief Executive Officer



Date:	September 13, 2012
/s/	Ralph M. Norwood
Ralph M. Norwood
Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Esteban CASABON-RAMIREZ, also known as Esteban Casabon, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40227 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 15, 2017

Eileen K. Wilson, Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S, Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Scott Andrew Martin, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Esteban Casabon-Ramirez appeals following his guilty plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry. He asserts that the district court plainly erred by convicting, sentencing, and entering judgment against him under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) based upon its determination that his prior New York conviction for sexual abuse qualified as a “crime of violence” under 18 U.S.C. § 16(b) and therefore an “aggravated felony” under 8 U.S.C, § 1101(a)(48)(F). Casabon-Ramirez argues that the definition of a “crime of violence” in § 16(b) is unconstitutionally vague on its face in light of the Supreme Court’s holding in *Johnson v. United States,*— U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015).1 He concedes that his constitutional challenge to § 16(b) is foreclosed by *United States v. Gonzalez-Longoria,*831 F.3d 670 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc), *petition for cert. filed*(Sept. 29, 2016) (No. 16-6259), The Government has filed a motion for summary affirmance based on Casabon-Ramirez’s concession.

The parties are correct that *Gomales-Longoria*forecloses Casabon-Ramirez’s facial constitutional challenge to § 16(b). *See Gonzalez-Longoria,*831 F.3d at 672-77. The Government also moves, in the alter* *215native, to stay the appeal until the Supreme Court decides whether § 16(b) is unconstitutionally vague in *Lynch v. Dimaya,*— U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 31, 195 L.Ed.2d 902 (2016) (granting certiorari). *Gonzalez-Longoña*is binding precedent unless overruled by this court en banc or by the Supreme Court, and a grant of certiorari does not override this court’s precedent. *See Wicker v. McCotter,*798 F.2d 155, 157-58 (5th Cir. 1986).

Accordingly, the motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. The Government’s alternative motions to stay the appeal and for an extension of time to file a brief are DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

1

. Although Casabon-Ramirez also argues that his New York conviction does not constitute an "aggravated felony" under § 16(a). because the New York sexual abuse statute sweeps more broadly than the generic definition of crime of violence, we need not reach that issue given the result regarding § 16(b),
#### Michael E. CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John THOMAS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 14-16730

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 8, 2017 *

Filed December 12, 2017

Michael E. Clark, Pro Se

D. Randall Gilmer, Deputy Attorney General, AGNV—Office of the Nevada Attorney General (Las Vegas), Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument, *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Former Nevada state prisoner Michael E. Clark appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment following a jury trial in Clark’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that Correctional Officer John Thomas failed to protect Clark from assault by another inmate. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. *Sprint/United Mgmt. Co. v. Mendelsohn,*552 U.S. 379, 384, 128 *359S.Ct. 1140, 170 L.Ed.2d 1 (2008) (evidentiary rulings); *Preminger v. Peake,*552 F.3d 757, 768 n.10 (9th Cir. 2008) (discovery). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Clark’s motions to compel the production of photographs and for sanctions because the record contains no evidence that the photographs existed. *See*Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(a)(1) (allowing discovery of items in a responding party’s “possession, custody, or control”); *Dunn v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.,*589 F.2d 408, 415 (9th Cir. 1978) (concluding that the district court did not abuse its discretion by declining to impose sanctions for failure to produce records that no longer existed).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying on grounds of relevance Clark’s requests to introduce'into evidence his motion for discovery sanctions and to testify that he had seen the photographs because neither was relevant to the disputed issues at trial.- *See*Fed. R. Evid. 401 (evidence is relevant if “it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable” and “the fact is of consequence in determining the action”); Fed. R. Evid. 402 (“Irrelevant evidence is not admissible.”).

We reject Clark’s contention that the district court was biased against him. *See Liteky v. United States,*510 U.S. 540, 555, 114 S.Ct. 1147, 127 L.Ed.2d 474 (1994) (“judicial rulings alone almost never constitute a valid basis for a bias or partiality motion”).

We decline to consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009) (per curiam).

Clark’s “Special Request for the Clerk and this Court” seeking relief against the pro bono attorney appointed to represent him (Dkt. No. 39) is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT
C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N (C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2
, SU B P ART B

. SE0 4360A160
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Ashley C.
Andersen Zantop, President and Chief Executive Officer of Trudy Corporation do
hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:

     1)  The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
         December 31, 2007 being filed with the Securities and Exchange
         Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
         amended; and

     2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

This Certification accompanies this Form 10-Q as an exhibit, but shall not be
deemed as having been filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or as a separate disclosure document of the Company or the
certifying officer.

Date: February 19, 2009                By: /s/ Ashley C. Andersen Zantop
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Ashley C. Andersen Zantop,
                                           President, Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Andrew
Kang, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2014-5 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2.
Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution,
servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except
as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association.



By:

/s/ Andrew KangName:

Andrew KangTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerSantander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as
Depositor(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)Date:

March 30, 2017
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel ESPINOZA-MUNOZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-30048

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 13, 2018 *

Filed February 16, 2018

Matthew F. Duggan, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USSP — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Spokane, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

John Stephen Roberts, Jr., FPDWA— Federal Public Defender’s Office (Eastern WA & IA), Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellant

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Miguel Espinoza-Munoz appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 36-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being an alien in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Espinoza-Munoz contends that the district court proeedurally erred by failing to remain cognizant of the applicable Guidelines range during sentencing. We review for plain error, see *United States v. Christensen,*732 F.3d 1094, 1101 (9th Cir. 2013), and conclude that there is none. The district court correctly calculated the sentencing range under the 2016 Guidelines Manual, and used that range as the starting point before varying upward based on the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors. *See Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 49-50, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). The record does not support Espinoza-Munoz’s argument that the district court based the sentence on the sentencing range that would have applied under the 2015 Guidelines Manual.

Espinoza-Munoz also contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable in *450light of his reasons for returning to the United States and the age' of his prior crimes. The district court did not abuse its discretion. *See id.*at 51, 128 S.Ct. 586. The 36-month sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the section 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including Espinoza-Munoz’s criminal and immigration history. *See Gall,*552 U.S. at 51, 128 S.Ct. 586.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.