alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Stock Agreement


 


This Stock Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of December
15, 2017, confirms our understanding with respect to the issuance of Common Stock of Liberated Syndication Inc. (the “Company”)
to Denis Yevstifeyev (the “Director”) with respect to the matters set forth herein.


 


The Board of Directors has awarded 200,000 shares of the Company’s
common stock (the “Stock”), subject to certain milestones and forfeiture clauses, to the Director. In an effort to
incentivize the Directors, the Board of Directors has set forth the following milestones and forfeiture clauses for these shares
of stock.


 


1. $5.00 per share


When the Company obtains an average of $5.00 per share closing price (adjusted
for stock splits) for any 10 consecutive trading days, the Director will retain 50% of the stock (100,000 shares), if obtained
within 30 months.


 


2. $7.00 per share


When the Company obtains an average of $7.00 per share closing price (adjusted
for stock splits) for any 10 consecutive trading days, the Director will retain 50% of the stock (100,000 shares), if obtained
within 36 months.


 


The effect of this grant on the market cap of the Company will NOT be taken
into consideration in attaining the milestone goals for the stock agreement dated April 13, 2017 between Denis Yevstifeyev and
Liberated Syndication Inc.


 


 


ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:


 


Denis Yevstifeyev


 


 


By:___________________________________________________


Name: Denis Yevstifeyev


 


 


Liberated Syndication Inc.


 


 


By:_____________________________________________________


Name: Chris Spencer


Title: Chairman of the Board of Directors
<PAGE>
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 15d-14(a) (17 CFR 240.15d-14(a)) AND SECTION 302
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert Mayer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of ChrisKen Partners Cash Income
Fund L.P., a Delaware limited partnership;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(c) and 15d-15(e)), for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; and

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report are conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation, and;

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information, and;

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November 11, 2005


/s/ Robert Mayer
---------------------------------------
Robert Mayer
Acting Principal Accounting Officer
ChrisKen Income Properties, Inc.,
   Managing General Partner
ChrisKen Partners Cash Income Fund L.P.

Exhibit 32


                                       17
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 8(a)


                                VINSON & ELKINS
                               ATTORNEYS AT LAW

                            VINSON & ELKINS L.L.P.
                             2300 FIRST CITY TOWER
                              1001 FANNIN STREET

                           HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002-6760

                           TELEPHONE (713) 758-2222
                              FAX (713) 758-2346


                                January 26, 1996



      American General Corporation
      2929 Allen Parkway
      Houston, Texas  77019-2155

      Ladies and Gentlemen:

            We participated in the preparation of American General Corporation's
      Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission with respect to the merger of Independent Insurance Group, Inc.
      with and into AGC Life Insurance Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of
      American General Corporation (the "Registration Statement").

            We hereby confirm to you our opinions with respect to federal income
      tax matters set forth in the Registration Statement under the headings
      "THE PROPOSED MERGER -- Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
      Merger" and "DESCRIPTION OF AMERICAN GENERAL CAPITAL STOCK -- Certain
      Federal Income Tax Aspects Relating to the Ownership and Disposition of
      American General Common Stock and American General 7% Convertible
      Preferred Stock."

            We hereby consent to the use of our name in the Registration
      Statement and to the filing of this letter as an exhibit to the
      Registration Statement. In giving this consent, however, we do not hereby
      admit that we are within the category of persons whose consent is required
      under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933 and the rules and
      regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder.

                                                Very truly yours,

                                                /s/ VINSON & ELKINS L.L.P.

                                                VINSON & ELKINS L.L.P.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 333 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 333

Expressing the sense of the Congress that public schools should conduct 
 ceremonies and other activities to educate and inform students about 
  the sacrifice and commitment of veterans of the United States Armed 
                                Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 2, 1998

 Mr. Redmond submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Congress that public schools should conduct 
 ceremonies and other activities to educate and inform students about 
  the sacrifice and commitment of veterans of the United States Armed 
                                Forces.

Whereas the men and women who have served in the United States Armed Forces have 
        made immeasurable sacrifices for the principles of freedom and liberty 
        that make this Nation unique in all civilization;
Whereas veterans of the United States Armed Forces forever carry the sense of 
        duty, pride, and patriotism that they developed in service to the 
        Nation;
Whereas the values instilled in the Nation's veterans should be passed on to 
        younger generations; and
Whereas the Congress established Veterans Day as a day for observing and 
        commemorating the sacrifices of all veterans: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that public schools should conduct 
ceremonies and other activities to educate and inform students about 
the sacrifice and commitment of veterans of the United States Armed 
Forces.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 262 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 262

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 13, 1998

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
    Authorizing the 1998 District of Columbia Special Olympics Law 
      Enforcement Torch Run to be run through the Capitol Grounds.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF D.C. SPECIAL OLYMPICS LAW 
              ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN THROUGH CAPITOL GROUNDS.

    On May 29, 1998, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House 
of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the 
Senate may jointly designate, the 1998 District of Columbia Special 
Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution referred to as 
the ``event'') may be run through the Capitol Grounds, as part of the 
journey of the Special Olympics torch to the District of Columbia 
Special Olympics summer games at Gallaudet University in the District 
of Columbia.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

    The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as may be 
necessary to carry out the event.

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

    The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical 
preparations for the event.

SEC. 4. APPLICABILITY OF PROHIBITIONS.

    Nothing in this resolution may be construed to waive the 
applicability of the prohibitions established by section 4 of the Act 
of July 31, 1946 (40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, 
displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 12, 1998.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT  32.1





STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE 
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned, Andrew Gordon, is the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Coffee Holding Co., Inc.(the Company).

This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2008 (the Report).

By execution of this statement, I certify that:

(A)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(B)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Coffee Holding Co., Inc. and will be retained by Coffee Holding Co., Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



June 13, 2008

/s/ Andrew Gordon

Dated

Andrew Gordon
532 P.2d 552

#### STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Roy Martinez BARROZA, Appellant.

No. 1 CA-CR 772.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department A.

March 11, 1975.

Bruce E. Babbitt, Atty. Gen. by Robert S. Golden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, for appellee.

*281Ross P. Lee, Maricopa County Public Defender by John Foreman, Deputy Public Defender, Phoenix, for appellant.

OPINION

DONOFRIO, Judge.

Appellant/defendant Roy Martinez Barroza pleaded guilty to two counts of burglary in the second degree in return for the dismissal of a petition to revoke probation in another case. He was sentenced on July 9, 1974 to serve concurrent terms of not less than one nor more than five years on both counts. His appeal asserts that the trial court failed, under Rule 17.3, Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S., to establish that a factual basis existed for the guilty plea to one of the two burglary counts.

We find that the record clearly establishes a factual basis for both guilty pleas and that the trial court so found before accepting the pleas as required by Rule 17.3, Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S. In our opinion, Rule 17.3 requires that the record as a whole must be sufficient to establish a factual basis for the acceptance by the trial court of a guilty plea at the plea proceeding. But it is not necessarily reversible error if the trial judge does not acknowledge the factual basis at that time. Likewise, if there is an absence of facts themselves on the record at the plea proceeding, but a statement by the trial judge at that time that he has found a factual basis, *and*this is borne out by the record as a whole on appeal, it would not necessarily be reversible error. See State v. Vasquez, 21 Ariz.App. 445, 520 P.2d 539 (1974).

The transcript of the preliminary hearing and the probation officer’s presentencing report were before the trial court at the hearing on acceptance of the guilty pleas. That record indicated that police apprehended appellant returning to the scene of one burglary where some stolen television sets were hidden; that his wallet (with identification) and his coat were found at the scene of the other burglary; and that he voluntarily admitted to police that he burglarized these and other locations in order to support a $100.00 a day heroin habit. Here the record does not indicate any prejudice to the defendant and if any error was made it was technical in nature. See Arizona Constitution, Article 6, § 27, A.R.S., and State v. Mendiola, 23 Ariz.App. 251, 532 P.2d 193 (filed March 4, 1975).

Affirmed.

OGG, P. J., and FROEB, J., concur.
#### Tyrone ELLIS Plaintiff-Appellant v. Brett BUTLER, Doctor, Correct Care Solutions Defendant-Appellee

No. 17-2500

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: February 20, 2018

Filed: February 28, 2018

Tyrone Ellis, Pro Se

Brent J. Eubanks, Humphries & Odum, Little Rock, AR, for Defendant-Appellee

Before GRUENDER, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Tyrone Ellis appeals after the district court1 adversely granted summary judgment in his *pro se*42 U.S.C. § 1988 action asserting a claim of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. He challenges the denial of a motion he filed seeking to correct a docket entry, and he challenges the summary judgment decision.

We have carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal. We first conclude that Ellis’s motion to correct the docket entry was properly denied as moot. We further conclude that summary judgment was properly granted, as the record established beyond genuine dispute that — during the relevant time period— Dr. Brett Butler did not know of, and did not deliberately disregard, Ellis’s medical needs. *See Fourte v. Faulkner Cty., Ark.,*746 F.3d 384, 387 (8th Cir. 2014) (explaining that deliberate-indifference claim requires showing that defendants actually knew of, but deliberately disregarded, an objectively serious medical need); *Peterson v. Kopp,*754 F.3d 594, 598 (8th Cir. 2014) (reviewing grant of summary judgment *de novo,*viewing record in light most favorable to non-moving party). Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable D.P. Marshall Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jerome T. Kear-ney, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Peter Limeri, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of PRG-Schultz International, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors:     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        November 13, 2007 By:  /s/ Peter Limeri    Peter Limeri    *Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer)*
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 20-3078

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Lavan Cortez-Johnson, also known as Gata lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - Cape Girardeau

____________ Submitted: September 20, 2021 Filed: September 27, 2021 [Unpublished]

____________ Before SMITH, Chief Judge, ARNOLD and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. After Lavan Johnson pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute methamphetamine, see 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and 846, and to distributing methamphetamine, see id. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B), the district court 1 deemed him a

1 The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.career offender and sentenced him to 180 months' imprisonment. Under § 4B1.1(a)

of the Sentencing Guidelines, a career offender includes a defendant who stands convicted of a felony controlled substance offense and has two prior felony convictions for controlled substance offenses. The district court determined that Johnson had two such predicate convictions, but he maintains that one of them, a Tennessee conviction for possessing a controlled substance with intent to deliver or sell it, see Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-417(a)(4), does not qualify as a predicate. Johnson concedes, however, that a prior decision of our court forecloses his argument, see United States v. Coleman , 977 F.3d 666, 670–71 (8th Cir. 2020), and says he is bringing this appeal merely to preserve his contention in case the Supreme Court or our en banc court overturns that case. Bound as we are by a prior decision, see United States v. Green , 946 F.3d 433, 440 (8th Cir. 2019), we affirm the judgment of the district court. Affirmed.

______________________________

-2-
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 73

Concerning the death of Chaim Herzog.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 6, 1997

Mr. BURTON of Indiana (for himself, Mr. GILMAN, Mr. BUNNING, Ms. ROSLEHTINEN, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr.

BORSKI, Mrs. MALONEY of New York, Mr. FOLEY, Mr. WOLF, Mr. EHRLICH, Mr. KING, and Mr. MANTON) submitted the following concurrent

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Concerning the death of Chaim Herzog.

Whereas Chaim Herzog, the sixth President of the State of

Israel, passed away on Thursday, April 17, 1997;

Whereas Chaim Herzog, in his very life exemplified the struggles and triumphs of the State of Israel;

Whereas Chaim Herzog had a brilliant military, business,

legal, political, and diplomatic career;

Whereas Chaim Herzog represented Israel at the United Nations from 1975–1978 and with great eloquence defended

Israel and its values against the forces of darkness and

dictatorship;
2

•HCON 73 IH

Whereas Chaim Herzog, as President of Israel from 1983–

1993, set a standard for honor and rectitude; and

Whereas Chaim Herzog was a great friend of the United

States of America and as President of Israel had the

honor of addressing a joint meeting of the United States

Congress on November 10, 1987: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) the Congress of the United States notes

4 with great sadness the passing of Chaim Herzog, a

5 great leader of Israel and a great friend of America

6 and the Congress sends its deepest condolences to

7 the entire Herzog family and to the Government and

8 people of Israel; and

9 (2) a copy of this resolution shall be transmit10 ted to the Speaker of the Knesset in Jerusalem, to

11 President Ezer Weizman of Israel, and to Mrs. Aura

12 Herzog of Herzlia, Israel.

Æ