alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7012 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KAREEM TOMLIN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,

District Judge. (CR-92-238-V)

Submitted: September 16, 2004 Decided: September 23, 2004

Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kareem Tomlin, Appellant Pro Se. Robert James Conrad, Jr., OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Kareem Tomlin seeks to appeal his 1993 conviction and

sentence. In criminal cases, the defendant must file his notice of

appeal within ten days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P.

4(b)(1)(A). Tomlin filed his notice of appeal many years after the

expiration of the appeal period. Because Tomlin failed to file a

timely notice of appeal, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

9:30 a.m. EDT, Friday, April 1, 2022.

# PLACE: 

Virtual meeting.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

                        Examinations matters. In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.cftc.gov/​.*

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Christopher Kirkpatrick, 202-418-5964.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: March 23, 2022.

Christopher Kirkpatrick,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2022-06493 Filed 3-23-22; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
page_1 Logo

 

 









 

page_2 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_3 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_4 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_5 Logo

 

 



 

 

page_6 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_7 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_8 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_9 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_10 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_11 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_12 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_13 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_14 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_15 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_16 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_17 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_18 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_19 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_20 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_21 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_22 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_23 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_24 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_25 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_26 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_27 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_28 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_29 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_30 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_31 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_32 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_33 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_34 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_35 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_36 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_37 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_38 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_39 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_40 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_41 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_42 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_43 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_44 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_45 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_46 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_47 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_48 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_49 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_50 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_51 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_52 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_53 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_54 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_55 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_56 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_57 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_58 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_59 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_60 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_61 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_62 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_63 Logo

 

 

 



 

 

page_64 Logo

 

 

 



 

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---
Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov Content Last Updated: 04/14/2010 Search Help More Search Options Printable Version 

## Walk-In Coolers and Freezers Analytical Spreadsheets This page presents the analytical spreadsheets associated with the preliminary technical support document (TSD) for walk-in coolers and freezers. Life Cycle Cost Spreadsheet
z Walk-In Coolers and Freezers Life-Cyc le Cost Analysis Spreadsheet ( Excel 27

MB ) National Impact Analysis
z Walk-In Coolers and Freezers National Impact Analysis Spreadsheet ( Excel

23 MB ) Shipments Model
z Walk-In Coolers and Freezers Shipments Analysis Model ( Excel 42 MB ) Instructions on how to use these spreadsheets can be found in the appendices to the preliminary TSD

. 

### Contact Information Charles Llenza Project Manager (202) 586-2192

Printable Version EERE Information Center Programs and Offices 

# Page 1 of 1 Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Wal k -In Coolers and Freezers Analyti

...

5/21/2010 htt p ://www1.eere.ener gy . g ov/buildin g s/a pp liance

_ standards/commercial/wicf _p reliminar y ...
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 266 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 266

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Department of Defense should 
 continue to buy goods and services made domestically and not deviate 
from the domestic source and manufacturing restrictions on procurements 
                         as established by law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 1998

 Mr. Strickland (for himself and Mr. LoBiondo) submitted the following 
concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on National 
                                Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of Congress that the Department of Defense should 
 continue to buy goods and services made domestically and not deviate 
from the domestic source and manufacturing restrictions on procurements 
                         as established by law.

Whereas the Department of Defense is responsible for protecting citizens of the 
        United States and its possessions from potential dangers from abroad;
Whereas it has always been a fundamental expectation that the Department of 
        Defense should function to protect, and, when possible, benefit American 
        communities, citizens, and their livelihoods, and has succeeded in doing 
        so through its domestic procurement program; and
Whereas the Department of Defense has proposed making exceptions to section 9005 
        of the National Defense Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 1993 
        (popularly known as the Berry Amendment), which restricts procurements 
        of certain articles, items, specialty metals, and tools to domestic 
        sources: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that the Department of Defense 
should--
            (1) continue to apply the domestic source restrictions 
        established by section 9005 of the National Defense 
        Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (Public Law 102-396; 
        106 Stat. 1876); and
            (2) demonstrate greater fiscal responsibility in all other 
        areas before proposing to make any exceptions to such section.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennis Michael GALLIPEAU, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-4390

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 19, 2017

Decided: December 21, 2017

Dennis Michael Gallipeau, Appellant Pro Se. Tommie DeWayne Pearson, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dennis Michael Gallipeau appeals the district court’s order granting the Government’s motion to modify the terms of his supervised release and denying Gallipeau’s request to terminate his supervision. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. The district court acted within its discretion by modifying Galli-peau’s terms of supervised release to include 90 days of home confinement with electronic monitoring and to submit to a search of his home at any time during supervision. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3583(d) (2012). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
#### ESTATE OF Frances M. SORIUS, Deceased

3659 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/07/2017

No. 1572IV of 2012 (Philadelphia)

Affirmed
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

EMMANUEL A. ROBINSON, § 

 § No. 466, 2017 

 Defendant Below, § 

 Appellant, § Court Below—Superior Court of the 

 § State of Delaware 

 v. § 

 § Cr. ID No. 1403011294 (N) 

STATE OF DELAWARE, § 

 § 

 Plaintiff Below, § 

 Appellee. § 

 Submitted: February 28, 2018 

 Decided: March 5, 2018 

ORDER 

 This 5th day of March 2018, it appears to the Court that: 

 (1) The Clerk issued a notice directing that the appellant show cause why 

this appeal should not be dismissed for his failure to pay the filing fee or to file a 

motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP motion”) seeking a waiver of the fee. 

Following his receipt of the notice to show cause, the appellant submitted a letter 

stating that he was unable to pay the filing fee. 

 (2) By letter dated February 12, 2018, the Clerk sent the appellant an IFP 

motion form. The Clerk directed the appellant to complete the motion and return it 

for filing on or before February 27, 2018. The Clerk advised the appellant that if he 

failed to file the motion on or before February 27, the appeal would be dismissed 

without further notice. 
2 

 (3) The appellant has filed nothing further in this case and has not filed the 

IFP motion. Under these circumstances, dismissal of the appeal is deemed to be 

unopposed. 

 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 

3(b)(2)(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 

 /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

 Justice
EXHIBIT  31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Grant C. Bennett, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant`s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant`s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)	Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant`s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant`s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably like to materially affect, the registrant`s internal control over financial reporting.

1. The registrant`s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant`s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant`s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant`s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant`s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	August 8, 2007

/s/	Grant C. Bennett
Grant C. Bennett
President and Treasurer
No. 12M7.

#### Forney *v.*Florida.

Motion for leave to proceed as a veteran denied.
(logo) usbank®

 

Global Corporate Trust

60 Livingston Avenue

EP-MN-WS3D

Saint Paul, MN  55107

 

usbank.com

 

 

**Annual Statement of Compliance**

**Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2014-C18**

 

 

*VIA: EMAIL*

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036 

Attention: Stephen Holmes 

stephen.holmes@morganstanley.com

 

 

Re: Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of September 1, 2014 (the "Agreement") betweenMorgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as the Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as theSpecial Servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as the Trust Advisor, U.S.Bank National Association, as the Trustee, Certificate Administrator,Certificate Registrar, Authenticating Agent and Custodian.

 

I, Thomas C. Campbell, aSenior Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association, as Custodian, as acertifying servicer hereby certify that:

 

(1)           A review of theactivities of the Custodian during the preceding calendar year (the "ReportingPeriod") and of the performance of the Custodian under the Agreement hasbeen made under my supervision; and

 

(2)           To the best ofmy knowledge, based on such review, the Custodian has fulfilled all itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout suchReporting Period.

 

Capitalized terms used but notdefined herein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.

 

 

Date: March 1st, 2020

 

 

U.S. Bank NationalAssociation, as Custodian

 

By: /s/ Thomas C. Campbell

Thomas C. Campbell 

Senior Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                     BD

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                      JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                             20,422,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                       6,117,000
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                         0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                                 4,021,000
<PP&E>                                              3,298,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     48,770,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                                0
<PAYABLES>                                          1,306,000
<REPOS-SOLD>                                                0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                         0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                    730,000
<LONG-TERM>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                         32,547,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       48,770,000
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                     352,000
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                                  458,000
<COMMISSIONS>                                       6,113,000
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                          68,000
<FEE-REVENUE>                                         775,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<COMPENSATION>                                      6,274,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (2,627,000)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (2,445,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (0.28)


</TABLE>
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 4.8



<Date>


<Recipient name>
<Recipient address>


Dear <Name>:    


It is my pleasure to confirm to you that on <Date>, in recognition of your service to <the Board of Directors of> Western Gas Holdings, LLC (the “General Partner”), you were granted <__________> phantom units of Western Gas Partners, LP (the “Partnership”) pursuant to the provisions of the Partnership’s 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”).  Capitalized terms not defined in this letter are defined in the Plan. 
A phantom unit is a notional unit that entitles you to receive a common unit representing a limited partner interest in the Partnership (a “Common Unit”) upon the vesting of the phantom unit or, at the discretion of the Board of Directors of the General Partner, cash equal to the Fair Market Value of a Common Unit.  Each phantom unit has the economic equivalent of one Common Unit.  Your phantom units will vest <100% or ____ %> on <Date or Dates>, and will have tandem distribution equivalent rights (which means that you will receive a credit for each phantom unit equal to the distribution, if any, that the Partnership makes on each Common Unit with such credit being payable to you in cash on a current basis as such distributions are paid to holders of Common Units).  If your <membership on the Board of Directors of the General Partner> <employment with Anadarko Petroleum Corporation> terminates for any reason prior to the vesting of your phantom units, your phantom units will be automatically forfeited unless and to the extent that the Board of Directors of the General Partner provides otherwise.  In addition, your phantom units will vest automatically upon a Change of Control of the General Partner or of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation.
In addition to the terms set forth above, your phantom units are also subject to the terms of the Plan, a copy of which is attached for your convenience.  Please note that this letter serves as your notice of award and is for your personal files. You are not required to sign and return any documents.


If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Philip H. Peacock, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, at 832-636-2439 or philip.peacock@westerngas.com.
	
		
	 
	Sincerely, 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	Benjamin M. Fink
President and Chief Executive Officer
Western Gas Holdings, LLC
(as general partner of Western Gas Partners, LP)
Order entered September 5, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 00999
- CV LOUIS MARTIN, JR., Appellant
V. U.S. MERCHANTS FINAN CIAL GROUP, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas Cou nty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10
- 15757 

### O RDER The Court has before it the request of Vielica Dobbins, Official Court Reporter of the 134th Judicial District Court, for an extension of time in which to file the reporter’s record. The
Court GRANTS the re quest and ORDERS that the reporter’s record be filed by September 30,
2013.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
#### Peggy Jean CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee

No. 17-30804 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 20, 2018

*463Peggy Jean Clark, Pro Se

Sandra Ema Gutierrez, Kevin G. Boit-mann, Peter M. Mansfield, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans, LA, for Defendant-Appellee

Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

This lawsuit against the United States has been dismissed because federal courts lack jurisdiction for claims of fraud against the United States. The Plaintiff has reached different names for the wrong she claims, but she has not been able to change her pleading and the fact that her claim arises out of fraud. The law is clear that we have no jurisdiction. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2680 and *Truman v. United States,*26 F.3d 592 (5th Cir. 1994).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

Thecertification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and ExchangeCommission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63of Title 18 of the United States Code.

May11, 2007

CharlesT. Chrietzberg, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of Northern CaliforniaBancorp, Inc. certifies:

a.               thatthis periodic report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

b.              thatinformation contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of NorthernCalifornia Bancorp, Inc.
|   | /s/ Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr. |   |
|--------|---------------------------------|--------|
|   | Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr.     |
|   | Chief Executive Officer         |
|   | and President                   |

 

1

----