alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IB

Union Calendar No. 12

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 32

[Report No. 105–16]

To consent to certain amendments enacted by the Legislature of the State

of Hawaii to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 21, 1997

Mr. ABERCROMBIE (for himself and Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA) introduced the

following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

MARCH 11, 1997

Additional sponsor: Mr. GALLEGLY

MARCH 11, 1997

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

JOINT RESOLUTION

To consent to certain amendments enacted by the Legislature

of the State of Hawaii to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, as required by section 4 of the Act entitled ‘‘An

4 Act to provide for the admission of the State of Hawaii
2

•HJ 32 RH

1 into the Union’’, approved March 18, 1959 (73 Stat. 4),

2 the United States consents to the following amendments

3 to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920, adopted

4 by the State of Hawaii in the manner required for State

5 legislation:

6 (1) Act 339 of the Session Laws of Hawaii,

7 1993.

8 (2) Act 37 of the Session Laws of Hawaii,

9 1994.

Union Calendar No. 12

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 32

[Report No. 105–16]

A BILL

To consent to certain amendments enacted by the

ian Homes Commission Act, 1920.Legislature of the State of Hawaii to the HawaiMARCH 11, 1997

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 5.1

                       [BROWN DREW & MASSEY LETTERHEAD]


                                 June 24, 2003


Front Range Himalaya Corporation
10000 Memorial Drive
Suite 600
Houston, Texas 770024


   Re: Registration Statement on Form S-4 Related to the Merger of Frontier Oil
       Corporation and Holly Corporation.


Ladies and Gentlemen:

   We have acted as counsel to Front Range Himalaya Corporation, a Wyoming
corporation (the "Company"), in connection with the preparation and filing with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act"), of a Registration Statement on Form S-4
(the "Registration Statement"), relating to the registration under the Act of
up to 47,749,311 shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share, of the
Company (the "Common Stock").

   In rendering this opinion, we have examined such corporate records and other
documents, and we have reviewed such matters of law, as we have deemed
necessary or appropriate. In rendering this opinion, we have also, with your
consent, relied upon oral and written representations of officers of the
Company and certificates of officers of the Company and public officials with
respect to the accuracy of the factual matters addressed in such
representations and certificates. Finally, in rendering this opinion, we have,
with your consent, assumed the genuineness of all signatures or instruments
relied upon by us, and the conformity of certified copies submitted to us with
the original documents to which such certified copies relate.

   Based on the foregoing, we are of the opinion that the shares of Common
Stock have been duly authorized and (i) when the Registration Statement has
become effective under the Act and (ii) when the shares of Common Stock have
been issued in the manner described in the Registration Statement, such shares
of Common Stock will be validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

   We express no opinion as to the laws of any jurisdiction other than the
Federal laws of the United States and the laws of the State of Wyoming.

   We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement and to the use of our firm's name under the heading
"Legal Matters" in the joint proxy statement/prospectus forming a part of the
Registration Statement.

                                          Very truly yours,


                                          /s/  Brown, Drew, & Massey, LLP
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 63 (Friday, April 1, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19138-19139]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06921]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (22-023)]


NASA Advisory Council; Aeronautics Committee; Meeting.

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 
announces a meeting of the Aeronautics Committee of the NASA Advisory 
Council (NAC). This meeting will be held for soliciting, from the 
aeronautics community and other persons, research, and technical 
information relevant to program planning.

[[Page 19139]]


DATES: Wednesday, April 27, 2022, 11:30 a.m.-5:30 p.m., Eastern Time.

ADDRESSES: Meeting will be virtual only. See dial-in and WebEx 
information below under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Irma Rodriguez, Designated Federal 
Officer, Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate, NASA Headquarters, 
Washington, DC 20546, (202) 527-4826, or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#345d4659551a571a465b50465d5341514e745a5547551a535b42"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8fe6fde2eea1eca1fde0ebfde6e8faeaf5cfe1eefceea1e8e0f9">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As noted above, this meeting is virtual and 
will take place telephonically and via WebEx. Any interested person 
must use a touch-tone phone to participate in this meeting. The WebEx 
link is https://nasaenterprise.webex.com/nasaenterprise/j.php?MTID=md18a1c8a22cc62b76b2387700e68f40b, the meeting number is 
2764 831 0780, and the password is M4MxhZBi@95 (case sensitive). You 
can also dial in by phone, U.S. Toll: 1-415-527-5035 passcode: 2764 831 
0780. The agenda for the meeting includes the following topics:

--Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate (ARMD) FY 2023 Budget 
Overview
--Sustainable Flight National Partnership
-- Future Airspace Vision

It is imperative that the meeting be held on this date to accommodate 
the scheduling priorities of the key participants.

Patricia Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2022-06921 Filed 3-31-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 138 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J. Res.138

                       One Hundred Fifth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  eight

                            Joint Resolution

 
  Appointing the day for the convening of the first session of the One 
                         Hundred Sixth Congress.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the first regular session 
of the One Hundred Sixth Congress shall begin at noon on Wednesday, 
January 6, 1999.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY; PRAIRIE 

FALCON AUDUBON, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE;

JANE P. KOLLMEYER; SCOTT C. No. 09-35200

NANNENGA, D.C. No. Defendants-Appellees,  4:08-cv-00363-EJL

and ORDER

MAGIC VALLEY TRAIL MACHINE

ASSOCIATION; IDAHO RECREATION

COUNCIL; BLUERIBBON COALITION,

INC.,

Defendants-IntervenorsAppellants. 

Filed September 30, 2010

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it

is ordered that this case be heard en banc pursuant to Circuit

Rule 35-3.

16763
No. 11-1423.

#### Bruner et ux. *v.*Josephine County, Oregon.

Ct. App. Ore. Certiorari denied.
enta-ex43_1302.htm



Exhibit 4.3



 

 

 



 

The shares of stock represented by this certificate have not been registered or qualified under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”), or applicable state securities laws and may not be sold, transferred, assigned or otherwise disposed of unless registered or qualified under the Act and such laws or an opinion of counsel satisfactory to the Company is furnished to the Company to the effect that such registration and qualification is not required.
Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, David M Long, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer, of Biofield Corp.
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-SSB of the Company for the quarter ended
June 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 13, 2004
                                     By: /s/ DAVID M. LONG
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         David M. Long, Jr., M.D., Ph.D.
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
                                         (Principal Executive Officer)

                                       22
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

As adopted pursuant to

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Special Financial Report on Form 10-K of Business First Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) for the
year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, David R. Melville, III, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Steven Champney, as Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                  |  |  |  |  |  |                                  
|----------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------------------
|Date: May 8, 2015 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ David R. Melville, III       
|                  |  |  |  |  |  |                                  
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | David R. Melville, III           
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | President Chief Executive Officer
|                  |  |  | 
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Steven Champney              
|                  |  |  |  |  |  |                                  
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | Steven Champney                  
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 138

JOINT RESOLUTION

Appointing the day for the convening of the first

session of the One Hundred Sixth Congress.
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 138

JOINT RESOLUTION

Appointing the day for the convening of the first session

of the One Hundred Sixth Congress.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the first regular session of the One Hundred Sixth
2

•HJ 138 EH

1 Congress shall begin at noon on Wednesday, January 6,

2 1999.

Passed the House of Representatives October 20,

1998.

Attest:

Clerk.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15** 
**- 6825** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
ROGER CHARLES DAY, JR. ,
Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. John A. Gibney, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3:07

- cr
- 00154

- JAG

- 3 )

Submitted : September 9 , 2015 Decided: September 14, 2015

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Roger Charles Day, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Ryan Scott Faulconer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia; Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not bindin g precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Roger Charles Day, Jr., seeks to appeal the district

court’s order s denying his motion to recuse the district judge

and his motion for six months equitable tolling to file a
supplemental 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) mo tion. This court may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(20 12 ), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28

U.S.C. § 1292 (20 12 ); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545

- 46 (1949) . The order s Day
seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable
interlocutory or collateral order s
. * Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequat ely prese nted

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

DISMISSED

* Day has also filed a notice of appeal asserting that the criminal judgment in his case was amended on July 6, 2015. The district court record does not contain any order on July 6, 2015, amending Day’s criminal judgment, and the letter Day received from t he United States Attorney is not an appealable order.
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 20 11

- NM

- 035

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JEREMY THOMAS CLARK,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

MIKE MARTEL,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 10-16986

D.C. No. 2:08-cv-02949-LKK

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence K. Karlton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 27, 2011** 

Before: HAWKINS, SILVERMAN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Jeremy Thomas Clark appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition as

untimely. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

FILED

OCT 5 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-16986

Clark contends his petition is not subject to AEDPA’s statute of limitations,

because he is actually innocent in the sense that the Information, jury charge, and

jury verdict forms only permitted a finding of guilt for second degree murder, and

therefore he was improperly found guilty of first degree murder. The district court

properly dismissed the habeas petition as untimely as it was filed after the one-year

statutory limitations period had ended. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Clark presents no

new evidence of actual innocence sufficient to excuse his untimely filing. See Lee

v. Lampert, No. 09-35276, 2011 WL 3275947, at *6 (9th Cir. August 2, 2011). 

“[A]ctual innocence means factual innocence, not mere legal insufficiency.” 

Bousley v. United States, 523 U.S. 614, 623 (1998) (internal quotation marks

omitted).

We construe appellant’s additional arguments as a motion to expand the

certificate of appealability. So construed, the motion is denied. See 9th Cir. R. 

22-1(e); Hiivala v. Wood, 195 F.3d 1098, 1104-05 (9th Cir. 1999) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME                                                     STATE OF INCORPORATION
----                                                     ----------------------
<S>                                                      <C>
Conrad Shipyard L.L.C. (formerly named Conrad Shipyard,
 Inc.)                                                         Louisiana
Orange Shipbuilding Company, Inc.                              Texas
</TABLE>
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 220

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 6, 1998

Received and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Regarding American victims of terrorism.

Whereas the traditional policy of the United States, reiterated by this Administration, has been to vigorously pursue and apprehend terrorists who have killed American

citizens in other countries;

Whereas numerous American citizens have been killed by Palestinian terrorists, most of them in Israel or the Israeli

administered territories, including 9 since the signing of
2

HCON 220 RFS

the Oslo Accords in 1993, namely Nachshon Wachsman

(New York), Alisa Flatow (New Jersey), Sara Duker

(New Jersey), Matthew Eisenfeld (Connecticut), Joan

Davenny (Connecticut), David Boim (New York), Yaron

Ungar (New York), Leah Stern (New Jersey), and Yael

Botwin (California);

Whereas at least 20 of the terrorists suspected in the killings

of American citizens in Israel or the Israeli administered

territories during 1993–1997 have been identified by

Israel as Mohammed Dief, Nabil Sharihi, Nafez Sabih,

Imjad Hinawi, Abd al-Maid Dudin, Adel Awadallah,

Ibrahim Ghneimat, and Mahmoud Abu Hanudeh, Abd alRahman Ghanelmat, Jamal al-Hur, Raid Abu

Hamadayah, Mohammad Abu Wardah, Hassan Salamah,

Abd Rabu Shaykh ’Id, Hamdallah Tzramah, Abd Al-Nasser Atallah Issa, Hataham Ibrahim Ismail, Jihad

Mahammad Shaker Yamur, and Mohammad Abbasm;

Whereas, according to the Israeli Government, 10 of those 20

terrorist suspects are currently believed to be free men;

Whereas the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1987 permits the prosecution, in the United States, of individuals who murder

American citizens abroad; and

Whereas the United States has previously acted to bring to

justice those responsible for the deaths of American citizens and has established a precedence of United States

intervention by demanding that Libyan leader Moammar

Qadaffi transfer to the United States the Libyan terrorists suspected of bombing Pan Am flight 103: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—
3

HCON 220 RFS

1 (1) the United States should demand the pros2 ecution of all suspected perpetrators of these attacks

3 against United States citizens;

4 (2) the United States should seek the coopera5 tion of the Palestinian Authority and all other ap6 propriate authorities in the prosecution of these

7 cases; and

8 (3) the suspects should be tried in the United

9 States unless it is determined that such action is

10 contrary to effective prosecution.

Passed the House of Representatives May 5, 1998.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 134 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
H. J. RES. 134

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1999, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 12, 1998

  Mr. Livingston introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1999, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That section 106(c) of Public 
Law 105-240 is further amended by striking ``October 12, 1998'' and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``October 14, 1998''.
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-61199

FELICIA PARKS, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Deputy Christopher Dean, Individually and in his 

Official Capacity; Deputy Dustin Wadford, 

Individually and in his Official Capacity;

Deputy Simon Stubblefield, Individually and in his 

Official Capacity,

Defendants—Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:19-CV-632

Before Jones, Southwick, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 4, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-61199 Document: 00515965875 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/04/2021
No. 20-61199

2

The court has carefully reviewed this appeal in light of the briefs, oral 

argument, and record. Having done so, we find no reversible error of fact or 

law and affirm for essentially the reasons stated by the district court.

AFFIRMED.

Case: 20-61199 Document: 00515965875 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/04/2021
IA

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 121

Disapproving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (most-favorednation treatment) to the products of the People’s Republic of China.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 4, 1998

Mr. SOLOMON introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on Ways and Means

JOINT RESOLUTION

Disapproving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment

(most-favored-nation treatment) to the products of the

People’s Republic of China

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Congress does not approve the extension of the

4 authority contained in section 402(c) of the Trade Act of

5 1974 recommended by the President to the Congress on

6 June 3, 1998, with respect to the People’s Republic of

7 China.

Æ