alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
LAW OFFICES OF WAYNE A. JOHNSON 

WAYNE A. JOHNSON, ATTORNEY 

2901 W. PARKER ROAD #864434 

PLANO, TEXAS 75086 

214.454.3292 

August 11, 2015 

Docket Management Facility 

U. S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave. 

SE West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Exemption request under Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act 

ID: FAA-2015-3099-0001 

Posting Date: August 6, 2015 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

The above-identified exemption request is for Drone Pilot, LLC, however it is mistakenly 

identified on the FAA website as "Gulf of Mexico Foundation, Inc." 

I am counsel for both so maybe that's how the confusion arose. The exemption request for 

Drone Pilot, LLC is dated June 4, 2015; the request for the Foundation is July 20. 

I just thought I would clarify that for you. 

Thank you. 

liPage 

-- ;-- ..-) 

·=-- ~ .~
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 August 16, 2019

Order 

Clerk

August 16, 2019

156444(66)(67)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 156444

v COA: 337715

Wayne CC: 11-010003-FC

SHOKELLE REON McKAY, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to withdraw his 

motion for reconsideration of this Court’s order of June 26, 2019, is GRANTED.
IIA

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 32

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 12, 1997

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

JOINT RESOLUTION

To consent to certain amendments enacted by the Legislature

of the State of Hawaii to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, as required by section 4 of the Act entitled ‘‘An
2

HJ 32 RFS

1 Act to provide for the admission of the State of Hawaii

2 into the Union’’, approved March 18, 1959 (73 Stat. 4),

3 the United States consents to the following amendments

4 to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920, adopted

5 by the State of Hawaii in the manner required for State

6 legislation:

7 (1) Act 339 of the Session Laws of Hawaii,

8 1993.

9 (2) Act 37 of the Session Laws of Hawaii,

10 1994.

Passed the House of Representatives March 11,

1997.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 64 (Monday, April 4, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 19384]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07022]



[[Page 19384]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2022-0188]


Safety Zone; Navy Week New Orleans 2022 Fireworks Display Event, 
New Orleans, LA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

ACTION: Notification of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce a temporary safety zone for a 
fireworks display located on the navigable waters of the Lower 
Mississippi River between Mile Marker (MM) 94.5 and MM 95.5. This 
action is needed to provide for the safety of life on these navigable 
waterways during the event. During the enforcement periods, the 
operator of any vessel in the regulated area must comply with 
directions from the Captain of the Port or designated representative.

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 165.845 will be enforced from 7:30 
p.m. to 8:30 p.m. on April 20, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
notification of enforcement, call or email Lieutenant Commander William 
Stewart, Sector New Orleans, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 504-365-2246, 
email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3067595c5c59515d1e711e6344554751424470454353571e5d595c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="17407e7b7b7e767a395639446372607665635762647470397a7e7b">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce safety zone 
located in 33 CFR 165.845 for the Navy Week New Orleans 2022 Fireworks 
Display event. The regulations will be enforced from 7:30 p.m. through 
8:30 p.m. on April 20, 2022. This action is being taken to provide for 
the safety of life on navigable waterways during this event, which will 
be located between MM 94.5 and MM 95.5 above Head of Passes, Lower 
Mississippi River, LA. During the enforcement periods, if you are the 
operator of a vessel in the regulated area you must comply with 
directions from the Patrol Commander or any Official Patrol displaying 
a Coast Guard ensign.
    In addition to this notification of enforcement in the Federal 
Register, the Coast Guard plans to provide notification of this 
enforcement period via Marine Safety Information Bulletins (MSIBs), 
Local Notice to Mariners (LNMs), and/or Broadcast Notice to Mariners 
(BNMs).

    Dated: March 29, 2022.
W.E. Watson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector New Orleans.
[FR Doc. 2022-07022 Filed 4-1-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification** **Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




Securities
      and Exchange Commission


450
      Fifth
      Street, N.W


Washington,
      D.C. 20549




Ladies
      and Gentlemen:





The
      certification set forth below is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule
      15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and with Section 1350 of
      Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.





Martin
      Wade III, the Chief Executive Officer of International Microcomputer Software,
      Inc, and Robert O’Callahan, the Chief Financial Officer of International
      Microcomputer Software, Inc, each certifies that:




1.
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




2.
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                International Microcomputer Software,
                Inc.






By: **/s/
      MARTIN WADE III**


Martin
      Wade III


Chief
      Executive Officer





By: **/s/ ROBERT O’CALLAHAN**


Robert
      O’Callahan


Chief
      Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)







37
H. Con. Res. 123 Agreed to July 28, 1997

One Hundred Fifth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-seven

Concurrent Resolution

Providing for the use of the catafalque situated in the crypt beneath the rotunda

of the Capitol in connection with memorial services to be conducted in the Supreme

Court Building for the late honorable William J. Brennan, former Associate Justice

of the Supreme Court of the United States.

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That the Architect of the Capitol is authorized and directed

to transfer to the custody of the Chief Justice of the United States

the catafalque which is presently situated in the crypt beneath

the rotunda of the Capitol so that such catafalque may be used

in the Supreme Court Building in connection with services to be

conducted there for the late honorable William J. Brennan, former

Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 11694]

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 506(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (the “Act”) (22 U.S.C. 2318(a)(1)), and Presidential Delegation of Authority dated March 16, 2022, I hereby determine that an unforeseen emergency exists which requires immediate military assistance to Ukraine. I further determine that the emergency requirement cannot be met under the authority of the Arms Export Control Act or any other provision of law.

I, therefore, pursuant to authority delegated to me by the President, direct the drawdown of up to $800 million in defense articles and services of the Department of Defense, and military education and training, under the authority of section 506(a)(1) of the Act to provide assistance to Ukraine. The Department of State will coordinate implementation of this drawdown.

                    This determination shall be reported to the Congress and published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: March 16, 2022.

Antony J. Blinken,

Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2022-06745 Filed 3-30-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-25-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

XIAOMEI CHENG,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 15

- 73891

Agency No. A206

- 532

- 904

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 17, 2022 * *

Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Xiaomei Cheng , a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of

the Board of Immigration A ppeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying her application s for asylum, withholding of

removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 15

- 73891

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for s ubstantial evidence the

agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility

determinations under the REAL ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder , 590 F.3d 1034,

1039

- 40 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidenc e supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination

based on inconsistencies in Cheng ’s testimony and documentary evidence

regarding the dates of her abortion and her divorce

. See id. at 1048 (adverse

credibility finding reasonable under the totality of the circumstances). Cheng ’s

explanations do not compel a contrary conclusion. See Lata v. INS , 204 F.3d 1241,

1245 (9th Cir. 2000). Thus, in the absence of credible testimony, in thi s case,

Cheng ’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft

,

348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003). In light of this disposition, we need not reach

Cheng ’s remaining contentions regarding corroboration or the merits of her claims.

See Simeonov v. Ashcroft , 371 F.3d 532, 53 8 (9th Cir. 2004) (courts and agencies

are not required to decide issues unnecessary to the results they reach).

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT protection

because Cheng ’s claim was b ased on the same testimony the agency found not

credible, and Cheng does not point to any other evidence in the record that compels

the conclusion that it is more likely than not s he would be tortured in China. See

Farah , 348 F.3d at 1157.3 15

- 73891

We do not consider the materials Cheng references in h er opening brief that

are not part of the administrative record. See Fisher v. INS , 79 F.3d 955, 963

- 64

(9th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until the mandate issue s

.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### Luis Antonio ALVARENGA, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 16-70852

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed December 20, 2017

Carolina Gomez, Esquire, Attorney, Law Offices of Carolina Gomez, Santa Ana, CA, for Petitioner

*915OIL, Vanessa M. Otero, Attorney, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App, P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Luis Antonio Alvarenga, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a continuance and review de novo questions of law. *Ahmed v. Holder,*569 F.3d 1009, 1012 (9th Cir. 2009). We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion or violate Alvarenga’s right to counsel in denying his request for' a further continuance, where the IJ granted him nine months to seek counsel once he was released from detention, and the IJ warned him that no further time would be granted to prepare his applications for relief, with or without counsel. *See id.*at 1012 (listing factors to consider in reviewing the agency’s denial of a continuance); *Garcia v. Lynch,*798 F.3d 876, 881 (9th Cir. 2015) (finding it was not unreasonable to deny a continuance where petitioner had six months to pursue post-conviction relief),

Alvarenga’s contention that he did not éxplicitly waive.his right to counsel at his final hearing is unavailing, where he was represented by counsel at that hearing.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
IA

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 110

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States prohibiting

courts from levying or increasing taxes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 11, 1998

Mr. MANZULLO introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States prohibiting courts from levying or increasing taxes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the follow4 ing article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitu5 tion of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents

6 and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by

7 the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States with8 in seven years after the date of its submission for ratifica9 tion:
2

•HJ 110 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE —

2 ‘‘Neither the Supreme Court, nor any inferior court

3 of the United States, nor the court of any State in its

4 application of laws under this Constitution or any Federal

5 law, shall have the power to instruct or order a State or

6 political subdivision thereof, or an official of such State

7 or political subdivision, to levy or increase taxes.’’.

Æ
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

134) ll-K-(B)-124 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:52 AM Sheet 134 of 325 
P.2 

II-K-(B)[-124_J 

ALTERNATIVE FORECAST OF RETIONAL INDUSTRIAL NATURAL GAS PRICES. 

Letter from T. Hogan, EEA to R. Short, EPA:EAB. 

July 28, 1983. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(B)|-120
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Hong Tan, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Golden Elephant Glass Technology, Inc. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1.



The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2009 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.





Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 15th day of May 2009.

/s/ Hong TanHong Tan 
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Golden Elephant Glass Technology, Inc. and will be retained by Golden Elephant Glass Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofCastle Dental Centers, Inc. (the “***Company***”) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “***Report***”), I, JamesM. Usdan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

 

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; 

 

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company; and 

 

(3)    A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

 

Dated: April 15, 2003
H. J. Res. 134

One Hundred Fifth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-eight

Joint Resolution

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1999, and for other

purposes.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 106(c)

of Public Law 105–240 is further amended by striking ‘‘October

12, 1998’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘October 14, 1998’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 10.2

 

Amendment to the QUALCOMM Incorporated

2006 and 2016 Long-Term Incentive Plans, as amended and restated

 

The QUALCOMM Incorporated 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended ,through November 30, 2014 (the “2006 LTIP”) and 2016 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2016 LTIP” and together with the “2006 LTIP,” the “LTIPs”), are hereby amended, pursuant to the resolution adopted by the Board of Directors on December 20, 2017, as follows, effective as of such date:

 

1.              Section 2.1(e) of the 2006 LTIP and Section 2.1(f) of the 2016 LTIP is hereby amended to add to the end thereof the following:

 

In addition, a “Change in Control” shall  occur in the event that individuals who, as of December 20, 2017, constitute the Board (the “Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board; provided, however, that any individual becoming a director subsequent to December 20, 2017 whose election, or nomination for election by the Company’s shareholders, was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the directors then comprising the Incumbent Board shall be considered as though such individual were a member of the Incumbent Board (such Change in Control, a “Board Change in Control”). 

 

2.              For purposes of all Award Agreements under the LTIPs for all Awards granted to Participants who are participants in the Qualcomm Incorporated Non-Executive Officer Change in Control Severance Plan, the definition of Good Reason that shall apply following a Change in Control that occurs pursuant to the last sentence of the definition of Change in Control, shall be the definition of Good Reason in the Qualcomm Incorporated Non-Executive Officer Change in Control Severance Plan; provided that if a subsequent Change in Control occurs that is not a Board Change in Control, then the definition of Good Reason in the applicable Award Agreement shall apply following such subsequent Change in Control.

 

3.              Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in each of the applicable LTIPs.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is executed as of the 20th day of December, 2017.

 

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED