alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

          - [223A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice advises the public that the Department of the Interior (DOI) approved a Tribal Energy Development Organization (TEDO) Certification for Twenty-First Century Tribal Energy, Inc, which is a Tribally owned corporation of Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians (Red Lake).

# DATES:

The certification takes effect on March 17, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Johnna Blackhair, Deputy Bureau Director, Office of Trust Services, Washington DC 20240, (202) 809-2069.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    A TEDO Certification allows the Tribe to enter into a lease or business agreement with the TEDO under 25 U.S.C. 3504(a)(2) or a right-of-way with the TEDO under 25 U.S.C. 3504(b)(2)(B) without Secretarial review and without a TERA. Red Lake's TEDO is organized under the laws of the Tribe and subject to the Tribe's jurisdiction, laws, and authority. The majority of the interest in the TEDO is owned and controlled by the Tribe (or the Tribe and one or more other Tribes) the Tribal land of which is being developed. The TEDO's organizing                           ( print page 18381)                        document requires the Tribe with jurisdiction over the land to maintain, at all times, the controlling interest in the TEDO. The TEDO's organizing document requires the Tribe to own and control, at all times, a majority of the interest in the TEDO. The certification is issued under 25 U.S.C. 3504(h) and nothing in the certification waives the sovereign immunity of the Tribe. This is to certify that the Red Lake's Tribally owned company Twenty-First Century Tribal Energy, Inc., is certified as a TEDO. The Certification is approved.                

Bryan Newland,

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2022-06710 Filed 3-29-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Rodrigo Ramiro MENCHACA, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-10554 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 20, 2018

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Rodrigo Ramiro Menchaca, Pro Se

Before REAVLEY, CLEMENT, and HO, Circuit Judges,

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rodrigo Ramiro Menchaca has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Men-chaca has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue *478for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
No. 11-9923.

#### Woods *v.*Booker, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 68

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the territorial integrity, unity,

sovereignty, and full independence of Lebanon.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 29, 1997

Mr. RAHALL (for himself, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. JOHN, and Mr. DINGELL) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the territorial

integrity, unity, sovereignty, and full independence of

Lebanon.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That

3 (1) the Congress—

4 (A) reaffirms the commitment of the Unit5 ed States to preserve the territorial integrity,

6 unity, sovereignty, and full independence of

7 Lebanon;

8 (B) commends the President for hosting

9 the ‘‘Friends of Lebanon’’ conference on De-
2

•HCON 68 IH

1 cember 16, 1996, and urges the President to

2 take further steps to assist Lebanon’s recon3 struction; and

4 (C) calls for the withdrawal of all non-Leb5 anese forces from Lebanon so that Lebanon will

6 no longer serve as the preferred battleground

7 for its neighbors;

8 (2) it is the sense of the Congress that—

9 (A) the President should consider resolving

10 the presence of non-Lebanese forces in Lebanon

11 without relying exclusively upon a comprehen12 sive peace in the region to resolve this issue;

13 and

14 (B) insofar as Lebanon’s neighbors require

15 security from Lebanon, Lebanon must be se16 cure from interference from its neighbors;

17 (3) the Congress—

18 (A) calls upon the President to negotiate

19 directly with officials of the Government of Leb20 anon on issues pertaining to Lebanon; and

21 (B) calls upon Lebanon to assert more

22 independence to assure the international com23 munity that Lebanon has the political will and

24 military capability to guarantee security along
3

•HCON 68 IH

1 its borders for itself and its neighbors and dis2 arm all militias;

3 (4) insofar as the democratic process is part of

4 Lebanon’s national character, the Congress urges

5 that Lebanon respect freedom of the press, human

6 rights, judicial due process, political freedom, the

7 right of association, and freedom of assembly;

8 (5) the Congress commends the Lebanese Gov9 ernment for its determination to hold municipal elec10 tions for the first time since 1963; and

11 (6) it is the sense of the Congress that the

12 President should use the guidelines set forth in

13 paragraphs (1) through (4) in formulating United

14 States policy toward Lebanon.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,113
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,651
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,296
<INVENTORY>                                      2,255
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,056
<PP&E>                                           6,486
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,176
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,613
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,820
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,547
<OTHER-SE>                                    (27,899)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,613
<SALES>                                          5,634
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,634
<CGS>                                            3,182
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,718
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 462
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,836)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        17
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,853)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,853)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)


</TABLE>
#### Crispin MORA, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 16-70722

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*478Submitted * January 16, 2018

Filed January 19, 2018

Gary Finn, Law Offices of Gary Finn, Indio, OA, for Petitioner.

Russell John Verby, Trial Attorney, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: REINHARDT, TROTT, and. HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2),

MEMORANDUM **

Crispin Mora, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Mora’s motion to reopen as untimely, where he filed the motion more than a year after the final order of removal, *see 8*C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and failed to establish that equitable tolling of the filing deadline was warranted, due to a lack of continuance or alleged notary fraud, *see Avagyan v. Holder,*646 F.3d 672, 677 (9th Cir. 2011) (The court recognizes equitable tolling “during periods when a petitioner is prevented from filing because of a deception, fraud, or error, as long as the petitioner acts with due diligence in discovering the deception, fraud or error.”).

Contrary to Mora’s contention, the BIA did not base its sua sponte determination on the untimeliness of the motion, and we otherwise lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary denial of sua sponte reopening. *See Bonilla v. Lynch,*840 F.3d 575, 588 (9th Cir. 2016); *Mejia-Hernandez v. Holder,*633 F.3d 818, 823-24 (9th Cir. 2011).

Because these determinations are dis-positive, we do not reach Mora’s remaining contentions.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

The undersigned executive officer of FirstFederal Bancshares of Arkansas, Inc. (the “Registrant”) hereby certifiesthat the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31,2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained thereinfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.

 

 
|   |                | By:    | /s/ Larry J. Brandt     |
|--------|---------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |                |   | Larry J. Brandt         |
|   |                |   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                |   |                    |
| Date:  | April 30, 2008 |   |                    |

 

----
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause Number: 01-12-00688-CR

Trial Court Cause 

Number: 1348372

Style: Raul Rodriguez

v The State of Texas

Date motion filed*: April 5, 2013

Type of motion: Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellate Brief

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Appellant's brief

Is appeal accelerated? Yes No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: February 6, 2013

Number of previous extensions granted: 1– 60 days

Date Requested: June 7, 2013

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: 

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time.

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: 

Judge's signature: /s/ Justice Rebeca Huddle

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of 

Date: April 8, 2013
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. (S)1350

      (ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the periodic report of Dynegy Holdings
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2001 dated
April 15, 2003, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Bruce A. Williamson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18,
Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
     as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     at the dates and for the periods indicated.



Date: April 15, 2003                      /s/ Bruce A. Williamson
                                          ----------------------------
                                          Bruce A. Williamson
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1




Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function


of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)









CERTIFICATION






I, Mark Kaczynski, certify that:




1.           I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Lease Trust 2014-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);




2.           Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;




4.           I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and




5.           All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.




In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party:  U.S. Bank National Association




Date:     June 26, 2015




By:/s/ Mark Kaczynski


Mark Kaczynski


President and Chief Executive Officer of


Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation


(senior officer in charge of the


servicing function)
# IMMC.EESC-2018-00004-AC.ENG.xhtml.EESC-2018-00004-00-00-AC-TRA-EN.docx

EN

European Economic and Social Committee

European Economic and Social Committee

INT/843

INT/843

EMA/seat

EMA/seat

OPINION


  European Economic and Social Committee


  Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 726/2004 as regards the location of the seat of the European Medicines Agency
  [COM(2017) 735 final – 2017/0328 (COD)]

OPINION

European Economic and Social Committee

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 726/2004 as regards the location of the seat of the European Medicines Agency
  [COM(2017) 735 final – 2017/0328 (COD)]

Consultation

| Consultation | European Parliament, 11/12/2017


  Council, 14/12/017 |
| --- | --- |
| Legal basis | Articles 114, 168(4)(c) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union |
| Section responsible | Single Market, Production and Consumption |
| Adopted in plenary | 17/01/2018 |
| Plenary session No | 531 |
| Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions) | 167/0/0 |

Consultation

European Parliament, 11/12/2017

European Parliament, 11/12/2017

Council, 14/12/017

Council, 14/12/017

Legal basis

Legal basis

Articles 114, 168(4)(c) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Articles 114, 168(4)(c) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Section responsible

Section responsible

Single Market, Production and Consumption

Single Market, Production and Consumption

Adopted in plenary

Adopted in plenary

17/01/2018

17/01/2018

Plenary session No

Plenary session No

531

531

Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions)

Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions)

167/0/0

167/0/0

Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 531st plenary session, held on 17 and 18 January 2018 (meeting of 17 January), unanimously to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 531st plenary session, held on 17 and 18 January 2018 (meeting of 17 January), unanimously to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Georges Dassis

Georges Dassis

The president of the European Economic and Social Committee

The president of the European Economic and Social Committee

______________
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry Lee KEY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-7388

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 15, 2018

Decided: February 20, 2018

Jerry Lee Key, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Jennifer Rada Herrald, Assistant United States Attorneys, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jerry Lee Key appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reimbursement of a $1000 fine ordered as part of his 1997 sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Key,*No. 2:97-cr-00033-1 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 29, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 15

Expressing the sense of the Congress relating to the abduction and detainment of Donald Hutchings of the State of Washington and four Western

Europeans in Jammu and Kashmir, India.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 5, 1997

Mr. PALLONE (for himself, Mr. MCCOLLUM, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr.

NETHERCUTT, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. NEY, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr.

MEEHAN, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. LOBIONDO, and Mr. MCHALE) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress relating to the abduction and detainment of Donald Hutchings of the State

of Washington and four Western Europeans in Jammu

and Kashmir, India.

Whereas the Al-Faran, a militant organization that seeks to

merge Kashmir with Pakistan, has waged a 5-year war

against the Government of India;

Whereas during the week of July 2, 1995, the Al-Faran abducted Donald Hutchings of the State of Washington and

four Western Europeans in the territory of Jammu and

Kashmir, India;
2

•HCON 15 IH

Whereas the Al-Faran have threatened to kill Donald

Hutchings and the Western European hostages unless

the Government of India agrees to release 20 suspected

guerrillas from its jails; and

Whereas the Al-Faran continues to hold Donald Hutchings

and the four Western European hostages against their

will: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) the militant organization Al-Faran imme4 diately release Donald Hutchings and four Western

5 Europeans from captivity; and

6 (2) the Al-Faran and their supporters cease

7 and desist from all acts of hostage-taking and other

8 violent acts within the State of Jammu and Kash9 mir, India.

Æ
No. 11-7700.

#### Al Alwi *v.*Obama, President of the United States, et al.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.