alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 114

Disapproving the certification of the President under section 490(b) of the

Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 regarding foreign assistance for Mexico

during fiscal year 1998.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MR. SHAW (for himself and Mr. MICA) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations,

and in addition to the Committee on Banking and Financial Services,

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each

case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction

of the committee concerned

JOINT RESOLUTION

Disapproving the certification of the President under section

490(b) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 regarding

foreign assistance for Mexico during fiscal year 1998.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3

4 SECTION 1. DISAPPROVAL OF DETERMINATION OF PRESI5 DENT REGARDING MEXICO.

6 Pursuant to subsection (d) of section 490 of the For7 eign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2291j), the Con8 gress disapproves the determination of the President with
2

•HJ 114 IH

1 respect to Mexico for fiscal year 1998 that is contained

2 in the certification (transmittal No. 98–15) submitted to

3 the Congress by the President under subsection (b) of that

4 section on February 26, 1998.

5 SEC. 2. WAIVER OF REQUIREMENT TO WITHHOLD ASSIST6 ANCE FOR MEXICO.

7 (a) WAIVER.—Notwithstanding subsection (e) and (f)

8 of section 490 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, the

9 requirement to withhold United States assistance and to

10 vote against multilateral development bank assistance con11 tained in such subsection (e) shall not apply with respect

12 to Mexico until March 1, 1999, if at any time after the

13 date of the enactment of this joint resolution, the Presi14 dent submits to Congress a determination and certifi15 cation described in subsection (b) of this section.

16 (b) DETERMINATION AND CERTIFICATION.—A deter17 mination and certification described in this subsection is

18 a determination and certification consistent with section

19 490(b)(1)(B) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 that

20 the vital national interests of the United States require

21 that the assistance withheld pursuant to section 490(e)(1)

22 of such Act be provided for Mexico and that the United

23 States not vote against multilateral development bank as24 sistance for Mexico pursuant to section 490(e)(2) of such

25 Act.
3

•HJ 114 IH

1 SEC. 3. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

2 For purposes of section 490(d) of the Foreign Assist3 ance Act of 1961, this joint resolution shall be deemed

4 to have been enacted within 30 calendar days after Feb5 ruary 26, 1998.

Æ
No. 11-10036.

#### Hamm *v.*South Carolina.

Ct. Common Pleas of Berkeley County, S. C. Certiorari denied.
| ​ | ​ | ​ | ​ | /s/ J. Adam Abram             | ​ |
|---------|---------|---------|---------|-------------------------------|---------|
| ​ | ​ | ​ | ​ | J. Adam Abram                 | ​ |
| ​ | ​ | ​ | ​ | Chairman and                  | ​ |
| ​ | ​ | ​ | ​ | Chief Executive Officer       | ​ |
| ​ | ​ | ​ | ​ | (Principal Executive Officer) | ​ |
| ​ | ​ | ​ | ​ | March 12, 2015                | ​ |
| ​ | ​ | ​ | ​ | /s/ Gregg T. Davis            | ​ |
|---------|---------|---------|---------|-------------------------------|---------|
| ​ | ​ | ​ | ​ | Gregg T. Davis                | ​ |
| ​ | ​ | ​ | ​ | Chief Financial Officer       | ​ |
| ​ | ​ | ​ | ​ | (Principal Financial Officer) | ​ |
| ​ | ​ | ​ | ​ | March 12, 2015                | ​ |

----
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES—OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the amendment to
Annual Report of Yuengling’s Ice Cream Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended January 31,
2022. as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert C. Bohorad,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.



Date: April 1, 2022



|By: | /s/ Robert C. Bohorad                                                     
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    | Robert C. Bohorad, Chief Executive Officer and
    Chief Financial Officer
|    | (Principal Executive Officer and Principal
    Financial Officer)
No. 11-1421.

#### Cicchiello *v.*Wetzel, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 29, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 17977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06489]



[[Page 17977]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

[Docket No. APHIS-2022-0006]


Notice of Request for Revision to and Extension of Approval of an 
Information Collection; Horse Protection Regulations; Correction

AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION: Revision to and extension of approval of an information 
collection; comment request; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) is 
correcting a notice that was published in the Federal Register on March 
8, 2022. The notice announced APHIS' intention to request a revision to 
and extension of approval of an information collection associated with 
the Horse Protection Program and enforcement of the Horse Protection 
Act. We provided an invalid telephone number for one of the contacts 
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. This notice provides the 
correct telephone number.

DATES: This correction is applicable on March 29, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Correction

    In FR Doc. 2022-04791, appearing on page 12927 in the Federal 
Register of March 8, 2022, the following correction is made:

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information on the Horse 
Protection Act Regulations, contact Dr. Lance Bassage, Director, 
National Policy Staff, Animal Care, APHIS 4700 River Road Unit 84, 
Riverdale, MD 20737; (301) 851-3748. For information on the information 
collection reporting process, contact Mr. Joseph Moxey, APHIS' 
Paperwork Reduction Act Coordinator, at (301) 851-2483; 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7913160a1c0911571416011c00390c0a1d18571e160f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d0babfa3b5a0b8febdbfa8b5a990a5a3b4b1feb7bfa6">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Done in Washington, DC, this 23rd day of March 2022.
Anthony Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-06489 Filed 3-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 21 Received in Senate (RDS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 21

              Providing for an adjournment of both Houses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 13, 1997

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
              Providing for an adjournment of both Houses.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, 
February 13, 1997, it stand adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, 
February 25, 1997, or until noon on the second day after Members are 
notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate adjourns 
or recesses at the close of business on Thursday, February 13, 1997, 
pursuant to a motion made by the Majority Leader, or his designee, in 
accordance with this concurrent resolution, it stand recessed or 
adjourned until 11:30 a.m. on Monday, February 24, 1997, or such time 
on that day as may be specified by the Majority Leader or his designee 
in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day 
after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 13, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.

                                 <all>
```
INDOOR HARVEST CORP. 8-K


 


Exhibit 10.2


 


	Indoor Harvest, Corp.


5300 East Freeway Suite A


Houston, TX 77020


Tel 832-649-3998


grow@indoorharvest.com


www.indoorharvest.com



	 



 


 





Annette
Knebel


10611
Alderford Court


Houston,
Texas 77070


Phone:
346-310-3427


Email:
aknebel@indoorharvest.com


 


December
13, 2017


 


Dear
Board of Directors:


 


In
my role as Chief Accounting Officer for Indoor Harvest Corp, I am pleased to provide my resignation, effective January 1, 2018,
due to my appointment as Chief Financial Officer for Indoor Harvest. I remain a member of the Indoor Harvest Board of Directors.
I look forward to my new role in the Company and am excited to continue to help the Company’s business plan succeed.


 


Sincerely,


 


 


Annette
Knebel
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 96-50656

Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BENITO LOPEZ-MILIAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(EP-96-CR-219-3)

_________________________________________________________________

March 26, 1997

Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Benito Lopez-Milian appeals his conviction and sentence for

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana. The

testimony of appellant’s co-conspirator, which was corroborated by

the testimony of the Customs Agents as well as by circumstantial

evidence, was sufficient to support the conviction. See United

States v. Greenwood, 974 F.2d 1449, 1457 (5th Cir. 1992), cert.
- 2 -

denied, 508 U.S. 915 (1993). Further support was provided by

appellant’s conflicting statements at trial and to federal

officials, evidencing his “consciousness of guilt”. See United

States v. Diaz-Carreon, 915 F.2d 951, 954-55 (5th Cir. 1990).

Appellant contends that the district court should have granted

him a two-point reduction in his offense level on the basis that he

was a minor participant in the conspiracy. Although the district

court’s denial of appellant’s objection did not contain a

recitation of the factual basis for its denial, the findings in the

presentence investigation report were clear enough that this court

was not left to “second guess” the basis for that sentencing

decision. See United States v. Carreon, 11 F.3d 1225, 1231 (5th

Cir. 1994). The record supports the district court’s conclusion

that appellant was just as culpable as the other participants.

There is no clear error in the decision not to award the reduction.

See United States v. Davis, 19 F.3d 166, 172 (5th Cir. 1994).

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 23.2

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of our report dated October 15, 2002, which will appear in
Vertica Software, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10 SB12G/A for the year ended
December 31, 2002.

                                              /s/ Randolph Scott & Company
                                              Certified Public Accountants, Inc.


San Anselmo, California
October 15, 2002
No. 11-1298.

#### Serrano *v.*Ziegler et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 7, 2019

No. 04-17-00338-CV

Travis CROW, Britt A. Crow, Laurian Crow Edison, and Karen A. Kraft,

Appellants

v.

Heddie Knappick LOOKADOO, Lisa Knappick Lucas, Mary Brown, Margaret Brown Nugent, 

Charles Brown, Joseph Gallagher, Josephine Brown Noll, Pamela Gallagher Palmer, and Irene 

B. Zoeller,

Appellees

From the 218th Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-10-00188-CVL

Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellants have filed a Second Response to Abatement. Appellants request that we 

extend the abatement of this appeal until March 4, 2019 so that the parties may finalize their 

settlement agreement. Appellants’ motion is GRANTED. It is ORDERED that appellants file, 

on or before March 4, 2019, a response in this court addressing whether the abatement should be 

lifted and the appeal reinstated on the docket of this court. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1, 43.2; see 

Caballero v. Heart of Texas Pizza, L.L.C., 70 S.W.3d 180, 180 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2001, 

no pet.).

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of February, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,268,013
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,963
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,350,163
<PP&E>                                      13,439,005
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,444,182
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,344,986
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          514,138
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,830,848
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,344,986
<SALES>                                      2,059,502
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,203,144
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,469,780
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                733,364
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            733,364
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   733,364
<EPS-BASIC>                                      17.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    17.86


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7764
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LUQUAM JONES, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-90-92, CA-96-918-2) Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: April 30, 1998 Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Luquam Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Stanley Glaser, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jones , Nos. CR-90-92; CA-96-918-2 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 29, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 42

Regarding the waiver of diplomatic immunity in cases involving serious

criminal offenses.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 11, 1997

Mr. DUNCAN (for himself, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. TRAFICANT, and Mrs. MYRICK)

submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Regarding the waiver of diplomatic immunity in cases

involving serious criminal offenses.

Whereas the United States was founded on the principle that

all men are equal before the law and anyone, rich or

poor, is entitled to the protection of the law and also subject to just penalties under the law;

Whereas international treaties regarding diplomatic and consular immunity place diplomatic and consular officials

from foreign countries in the unique situation of being

above the law and not subject to prosecution for criminal

offenses committed in the United States;

Whereas recent events indicate that this situation is endangering the safety and security of citizens and other persons residing in the United States;
2

•HCON 42 IH

Whereas in the vehicular manslaughter case involving a Georgian diplomat in Washington, the Department of State

has been able to secure the agreement of the Georgian

Government to waive the diplomat’s immunity; and

Whereas it is incumbent on the President and Secretary of

State to alleviate the injustice of the situation regarding

diplomatic and consular immunity: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) the President and Secretary of State should

4 take all necessary steps to ensure that whenever

5 there is probable cause to believe that an individual

6 who is entitled to immunity from the criminal juris7 diction of the United States, due to diplomatic or

8 consular immunity, may have committed a serious

9 criminal offense, the country such individual rep10 resents waives the immunity of that individual; and

11 (2) whenever there is probable cause to believe

12 that a United States individual who is entitled to

13 immunity from the criminal jurisdiction of a foreign

14 country due to diplomatic or consular immunity

15 commits a serious criminal offense, the United

16 States should waive the individual’s immunity.

Æ
------uNJTEDFrATEs-<JrAJVIERICA NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD WASIDNGTON, D. C.



### IN THE MATTER OF: OFFSHORE FLIGHT SCHOOL, INC. Respondent. ) 

### ) ) ) ) ) ) )



## _________________________ ) FAA Case No. 2014WP910016 FDMS NO. FAA-2014-0691 Law Judge: Douglas M. Rawald 

## DOCKET

COMPLAINANT & RESPONDENT'S JOINT RESPONSE TO ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO MEETAND CONFERREGARDING LITIGATION AND SCHEDULING ISSUES 

### Complainant and Respondent file thisjointresponse as follows: 1. On July 5, 2016, the parties met to discuss litigation issues and proposed scheduling. 2. 

### A. The parties do not wish to change the previously established venue ofHonolulu, HI. B. The parties propose to complete discovery by September 9, 2016. C. There are no pending motions. D. The parties propose a telephonic pre-hearing conference with the ALI on September 16,2016. E. The parties propose a due date for the filing ofany pre-hearing motions on September 30,2016. F. The parties propose the following hearing dates based on a one (1) day hearing: October 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 27, November 1, 2,or 3, 2016.BY:**WliHREFO~willlid**

### IC>poo.,oi fik .,,

## io"=po=

# ~c;~'**--;;--"~~'** 

# -. Charles Raley, Senior Attorney Enforcement Division, AGC-300 Olticc ofthe ChiefCounsel Telephone: (202) 267-3357 Facsimile: (202) 267-5106 

# /1_ / ,ifij['**~d (_j,,f~**  David Glcm1 Bettencorut, Esq, Counsel for RespondentCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this date I served one (1) copy ofthe foregoing Joint Report In the Matter ofOffshore Flight School, Inc., FDMS NO. FAA-2014-0691, by Certified mail- Return-Receipt Requested and by facsimile, to: The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 Fax: 202-366-7536 In addition, I hereby certify that onthis date I sent the original and one (1) copy by Certified mail

- Retnm-Receipt Requested, to: Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWright Building- Suite 2Wl000 In addition, I hereby certify that on this date I sent one (1) copy by Certified mail- ReturnReceipt Requested and by facsimile, to: David Glenn Bettencourt, Esq. Suite 304 Dillingham Transportation Building 735 Bishop Street Honolulu, ill 96813

# &:?~ Date: July 13,2016 

# ---
No. 11-8335.

#### Pierre et al. *v.*Holder, Attorney General.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.