alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00293

- CR

Michael Wayne Perry

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 297th District Court

o f Tarrant County (1302260D )

J une 11, 2015

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SEC OND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot

______________ Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
No. 11-1286.

#### Harvard *v.*Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corp., dba Metra.

App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 11.0

                   INTERCARGO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                   (in thousand, except for per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          For the three months
                                                                             ended March 31,

                                                                          1998            1997
                                                                         ------          ------
<S>                                                                      <C>             <C>
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:

    Net income                                                           $  369          $1,795

   Average common shares outstanding                                      7,700           7,660

   Per common share amount                                               $ 0.05          $ 0.23
                                                                         ======================


DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:

   Net income                                                            $  369          $1,795

   Average common shares outstanding                                      7,700           7,660
   Incremental shares from assumed converstions at the average market
   prices of $12.604 and $9.186, respectively                                12              13
                                                                         ----------------------

   Weighted average number of common shares outstanding as adjusted       7,712           7,673
                                                                         ======================

   Fully diluted earnings per share                                      $ 0.05          $ 0.23
                                                                         ======================
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 292 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 292

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Calling for an end to the recent conflict between Eritrea and Ethiopia, 
                        and for other purposes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 292

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the 1991 ouster of the Mengistu dictatorship led to relative peace and 
        stability in Eritrea and Ethiopia;
Whereas in 1993 Eritrea became independent after an internationally supervised 
        referendum and the Government of Ethiopia accepted the result of the 
        referendum;
Whereas the Governments of Eritrea and Ethiopia have worked closely on a wide 
        range of issues over the past several years;
Whereas the Governments of Eritrea and Ethiopia enjoy warm relations with the 
        United States;
Whereas on May 6, 1998, a military confrontation erupted between Eritrea and 
        Ethiopia, resulting in the deaths of hundreds of innocent civilians and 
        the displacement of tens of thousands of people;
Whereas the peoples of Eritrea and Ethiopia have suffered for decades due to war 
        and manmade famines and do not deserve once again to suffer due to armed 
        conflict;
Whereas the conflict between Eritrea and Ethiopia could destabilize the entire 
        subregion and lead to a massive humanitarian crisis;
Whereas the Governments of Eritrea and Ethiopia have both stated that they are 
        committed to a peaceful resolution of the conflict; and
Whereas the Governments of the United States and Rwanda, as well as countries in 
        the region, have put forth proposals for resolving the conflict: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) calls on both Eritrea and Ethiopia immediately to bring 
        an end to the violence between the two countries;
            (2) commends the executive branch of the United States 
        Government for brokering a moratorium on air raids between 
        Eritrea and Ethiopia;
            (3) commends the recent efforts of the United States 
        facilitation team to resolve the crisis, and encourages 
        continued United States engagement toward a peaceful resolution 
        of the conflict; and
            (4) calls on President Isaias Afewerki and Prime Minister 
        Meles Zenawi to end the conflict peacefully before it escalates 
        into a full-scale war.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 9, 1998.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Michael O'Reilly, President and Chief Executive Officer of Windswept
Environmental Group, Inc., certify that the Form 10-Q of Windswept Environmental
Group, Inc. for the period ended March 28, 2006, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Windswept Environmental
Group, Inc. for the periods presented.


                                       /s/ Michael O'Reilly
                                       --------------------------------
                                       Name: Michael O'Reilly
                                       (principal executive officer and
                                       principal financial officer)

Date: May 24, 2006
No. 11-9773.

#### Whitley *v.*Scism, Warden.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Phillip ALEXANDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PAUL BROWN FARMERS INSURANCE AGENCY, LLC, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-16741

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed December 26, 2017

Phillip Alexander, Pro Se

Karl H. Smith, Esquire, Attorney, Law Offices of Karl H. Smith, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

**The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P, 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

The order to show cause (Docket Entry No. 2) is discharged.

*381Phillip Alexander appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his action seeking damages related to an automobile accident. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Naffe v. Frey,*789 F.3d 1030, 1035 (9th Cir. 2015), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Alexander’s action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because Alexander failed to allege facts sufficient to show that there is complete diversity between the parties. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1332(a); *Naffe,*789 F.3d at 1039 (setting forth elements of diversity jurisdiction). . ’

We reject as without merit Alexander’s contentions regarding default judgment.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition, is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
NUMBER 13-21-00185-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

MICHAEL MCCANN, TDCJ #879919, Appellant,

 v.

MEGAN THOMPSON, ET AL., Appellees. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 36th District Court

of Bee County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Silva

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras

Appellant, Michael McCann, attempted to perfect an appeal from a final judgment

issued by the trial court. Appellant is on the list of vexatious litigants compiled by the 

Office of the Court Administration of the Texas Judicial System, and he has been 

prohibited from filing any more litigation in Texas courts without permission of a local 

administrative judge. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 11.104; see generally
2

https://www.txcourts.gov/judicial-data/vexatious-litigants/. 

The Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the attempted appeal fails to 

comply with the vexatious litigant statute. Appellant was advised that unless he has 

obtained the permission of the local administrative judge and provided a copy of such 

order permitting the filing of this appeal within ten days from the date of receipt of

this notice, the appeal would be dismissed. 

Appellant has failed to respond to the Court’s directive and the record before the 

Court fails to show that appellant obtained the permission of the local administrative 

judge to file this appeal. With limited exceptions not applicable to this case, "a clerk of 

a court may not file a litigation, original proceeding, appeal, or other claim presented 

by a vexatious litigant subject to a prefiling order under Section 11.101 unless the 

litigant obtains an order from the local administrative judge permitting the filing." TEX.

CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 11.103. 

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to 

correct the defect in this matter, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. 

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a),(c). 

DORI CONTRERAS

Chief Justice

Delivered and filed on the 

16th day of September, 2021.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

GREGORY AARON THOMAS,

Petitioner

v.

TOM WOLF, GOVERNOR OF 

PENNSYLVANIA AND JOHN WETZEL, 

SECRETARY OF THE PA DEPARTMENT 

OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 82 EM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 2019, the Petition for Leave to Appeal Nunc 

Pro Tunc is DENIED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.5

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Mission Resources Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(File Nos. 333-63562, 333-54798, 333-57827, 333-27707 and 33-91326) on Form S-8
of Mission Resources Corporation of our report dated March 14, 2003, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Mission Resources Corporation
(formerly Bellwether Exploration Company) and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2002 and 2001 and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, which report appears in
the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of Mission Resources
Corporation.

As discussed in note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, effective
January 1, 2002, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, "Goodwill and other Intangible Assets". As
discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company
changed its method of accounting for derivative instruments and hedging
activities in 2001.

(signed) KPMG LLP

Houston, Texas
April 4, 2003
No. 11-1457.

#### Read *v.*Washington.

Ct. App. Wash. Certio-rari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

   We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form S-4 of
NextMedia Operating, Inc. of our report dated May 1, 2001, relating to the
financial statements of Pride Communications, L.L.C. which appear in such
Registration Statement. We also consent to the references to us under the
heading "Experts."

McGladrey & Pullen LLP

Schaumburg, Illinois
March 12, 2002
<PAGE>


                                                                       EXHIBIT 4




                             VERTICA SOFTWARE, INC.
                  (FORMERLY PERFECTION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION)
                          (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

               OCTOBER 1, 2002 (Inception) THROUGH MARCH 31, 2003


NOTE 13 - STOCKHOLDER EQUITY

     (a) 2002 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

On October 1, 2002, the Board of Directors authorized the Employee Stock
Purchase Plan (the Employee Plan). Under the Employee Plan, the Company may
issue up to an aggregate of 3,000,000 shares of common stock to employees at 85%
of the lower of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant,
except for 10% shareholders who may exercise options at no less than 110% of the
fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. Under the Employee Plan,
offerings were made in October 2002. The Company converted approximately $1,056
in accrued employee contributions into Stockholders Equity as a result.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Stock Options Outstanding Under Incentive Plan:                                  Price per Share
                                                                                    ----------------
                                                                                                   Weighted
                                                 Shares                         Range              Average
                                                 ------                         -----              -------
<S>                                            <C>                         <C>                      <C>
Balance, October 1, 2002                       7,000,000                   $0.035 - $0.17           $0.10
         Granted                               2,478,772                   $0.035 - $0.045          $0.04
         Exercised                                     0                   $ 0.00 - $0.00           $0.00
         Cancelled                                     0                   $ 0.00 - $0.00           $0.00
                                               ---------                   --------------           -----

Balance, October 1, 2002                       4,521,228                   $0.035 - $0.17           $0.07
                                               =========                   ==============           =====
</TABLE>

(b) Chairman of the Board/Chief Executive Officer/President Compensation

A final balance of an Consulting Agreement that expired December 31, 2001
between Vertica Software, Inc. and William F. Mason at a balance owed of 851,903
shares. On January 1, 2002 William F. Mason took the positions of Chairman of
the Board/Chief Executive Officer/President of Vertica Software, Inc. His
Compensation was accrued at $10,000 per month and is being paid in the form of
Common Stock for 1,626,849 shares at waited value of .055 per share.
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 104

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the

fiscal year 1998, and for other purposes.
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 104

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

1998, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 106(3) of Public Law 105–46 is further

4 amended by striking ‘‘November 9, 1997’’ and inserting
2

•HJ 104 EH

1 in lieu thereof ‘‘November 10, 1997’’, and each provision

2 amended by sections 122 and 123 of such public law shall

3 be applied as if ‘‘November 10, 1997’’ was substituted for

4 ‘‘October 23, 1997’’.

Passed the House of Representatives November 9,

1997.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBITS 31.1and 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Grant C. Bennett, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant`s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant`s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)	Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant`s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant`s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably like to materially affect, the registrant`s internal control over financial reporting.

1. The registrant`s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant`s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant`s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant`s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant`s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	August 2, 2006
/s/	Grant C. Bennett
Grant C. Bennett
President and Treasurer
#### ANSON CHI, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Andrew STOVER, Assistant United States Attorney; Glenn Roque-Jackson, Assistant United States Attorney; John M. Bales, United States Attorney; Garland Don Cardwell, Standby Counsel; Richard A. Schell, Judge; James Daniel Wofford; Thomas Sparks, Defendants-Appellees

No. 16-41637 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 19, 2017

Anson Chi, Pro Se

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and ELROD and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Anson Chi,- federal prisoner # 44588-177, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to *Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,*403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), alleging that the United States district judge, the United States Attorney, two Assistant United States Attorneys, federal agents, and standby counsel in his criminal proceedings conspired to use false evidence against him to obtain his unconstitutional guilty plea. The district court' dismissed Chi’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) as frivolous and for failure to state a claim after concluding that Chi’s claims were barred by *Heck v. Humphrey,*512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994).

Our review of the dismissal is de novo. *Green v. Atkinson,*623 F.3d 278, 279-80 *836(5th Cir. 2010). Success on Chi’s present claims would clearly “render [his] conviction [and] sentence invalid.” *Heck,*512 U.S. at 486, 114 S.Ct. 2364. As Chi’s criminal appeal is pending before this court, he has failed to make the requisite showing “that the conviction or sentence has been reversed on direct appeal, expunged by executive order, declared invalid by a state tribunal authorized to make such determination, or called into question by a federal court’s issuance of a writ of habeas corpus.” *Id.*at 486-87, 114 S.Ct. 2364. Thus, his complaint is legally frivolous. *See Hamilton v. Lyons,*74 F.3d 99, 103 (5th Cir. 1996). The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

We previously imposed the 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) bar against Chi because he had accumulated three strikes. *Chi v. Doe,*690 Fed.Appx. 293, 294 (5th Cir. 2017). Chi is REMINDED that he is barred from proceeding IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. *See*§ 1915(g).

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R, 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 104 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J. Res.104

                       One Hundred Fifth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-seven

                            Joint Resolution

 
 Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1998, and 
                           for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That section 106(3) of Public 
Law 105-46 is further amended by striking ``November 9, 1997'' and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``November 10, 1997'', and each provision 
amended by sections 122 and 123 of such public law shall be applied as 
if ``November 10, 1997'' was substituted for ``October 23, 1997''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```