alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit








THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE
GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC.
DEFERRED PHANTOM STOCK UNIT PLAN
Global Water Resources, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), previously established the Global Water Resources, Inc. Deferred Phantom Stock Unit Plan dated as of January 1, 2011 (the “Plan”).  The Plan has been amended on two prior occasions.  By adoption of this Third Amendment, the Corporation now desires to further amend the Plan as set forth below.  
1.This Third Amendment shall be effective as of the date on which it is executed. 
2.Section 1.1 (Definitions) is hereby amended by the deleting the definition of “Non-U.S. Taxpayer Director” in subsection (v).
3.Section 3.4 (Redemption) is hereby amended by deleting subsections (b) and (c) thereof.  
4.The Flush language in Section 5.1 (Amendment of Plan) shall be amended and restated as follows:
shall only be effective upon such amendment, modification or change being approved by the Board, and, if required, by shareholders of the Corporation if required by NASDAQ or any other regulatory authorities having jurisdiction over the Corporation and provided any such amendment shall be effective only if this Plan will continue to meet the requirements of paragraph 6801(d) of the regulations to the Income Tax Act (Canada) or any successor to such provision.
5.Section 5.9 (Section 409A Compliance) is hereby amended by deleting the first sentence thereof.
6.This Third Amendment shall supersede the provisions of the Plan to the extent those provisions are inconsistent with the provisions and intent of this Third Amendment.











IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Third Amendment to be executed as of this 30th day of November, 2017.
Global Water Resources, Inc.
/s/ Ron L. Fleming                
By: Ron L. Fleming                                        
Its: CEO and President
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 Certifications

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Thomas M. Siebel, Chairman and CEO of Siebel Systems, Inc. (the "Company"), and Kenneth A. Goldman, Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge:

1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 10th day of November, 2003.

|/s/ Thomas M. Siebel
Thomas M. Siebel 
Chairman and CEO 
(Principal Executive Officer) | /s/ Kenneth A. Goldman
Kenneth A. Goldman
Senior Vice President, Finance and
  Administration and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certification "accompanies" the Periodic Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Period Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 758 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 758

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to improve 
            attorney accountability, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. ATTORNEY ACCOUNTABILITY.

    (a) Sanctions Under Rule 11.--Rule 11(c) of the Federal Rules of 
Civil Procedure is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``may'' and inserting 
        ``shall'';
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``Rule 5'' and all that 
        follows through ``motion.'' and inserting ``Rule 5.''; and
            (3) in paragraph (4), by striking ``situated'' and all that 
        follows through the end of the paragraph and inserting 
        ``situated, and to compensate the parties that were injured by 
        such conduct. Subject to the limitations in paragraph (5), the 
        sanction shall consist of an order to pay to the party or 
        parties the amount of the reasonable expenses incurred as a 
        direct result of the violation, including reasonable attorneys' 
        fees and costs. The court may also impose additional 
        appropriate sanctions, such as striking the pleadings, 
        dismissing the suit, or other directives of a non-monetary 
        nature, or, if warranted for effective deterrence, an order 
        directing payment of a penalty into the court.''.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this Act or an amendment made 
by this Act shall be construed to bar or impede the assertion or 
development of new claims, defenses, or remedies under Federal, State, 
or local laws, including civil rights laws, or under the Constitution 
of the United States.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 17, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 758

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to improve 
            attorney accountability, and for other purposes.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2018-D-3462]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

      ( print page 16218)    

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a notice entitled “Verification Systems Under the Drug Supply Chain Security Act for Certain Prescription Drugs; Draft Guidance for Industry” that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         of March 10, 2022. The document omitted the date by which comments on the draft guidance should be submitted to FDA. This error is corrected in this document for clarity.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Sarah Venti, Office of Compliance, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-3130,                         *drugtrackandtrace@fda.hhs.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of March 10, 2022 (87 FR 13738), appearing on page 13738, in FR Doc. 2022-05018, in the second column, the                     **DATES**                     section is corrected to read as follows:                

**DATES:**                     The announcement of the guidance is published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on March 10, 2022. Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR 10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency considers your comment on this draft guidance before it begins work on the final version of the guidance, submit either electronic or written comments on the draft guidance by May 9, 2022.                

Dated: March 17, 2022.

Andi Lipstein Fristedt,

Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Legislation, and International Affairs, U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

[FR Doc. 2022-06006 Filed 3-21-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
Mt. Tom Generating Co. LLC

Analytical Laboratory

15 Agawam Avenue

West Springfield, MA 01089

Phone (413) 214-6541 Fax (413) 214-6842

email-madhu.shah@gdfsuezna.com

Date Taken:

Date Received:

3/29/10

4/1/10

Sample

Description:

4/16/10

# 6 Oil Bottom Source ID:

Date Completed:

Work Order: 10-0498

West Springfield Source

#6 Fuel As Fired

Madhu Shah, Laboratory Supervisor

Sample No: 21445

Comments

API Gravity @ 60oF 11.4 ASTM D-287

Specific Gravity @ 60oF 0.9902 ASTM D-287

Pounds per Gallon 8.255

Sulfur, % 0.86 ASTM D-1552

Ash,% 0.07 ASTM D-482

BTU/Lb 18,355 ASTM D-240

BTU/Gal 151,530 ASTM D-240

Parameter Results ASTM Methods 
Mt. Tom Generating Co. LLC

Analytical Laboratory

15 Agawam Avenue

West Springfield, MA 01089

Phone (413) 214-6541 Fax (413) 214-6842

email-madhu.shah@gdfsuezna.com

Date Taken:

Date Received:

3/30/10

4/1/10

Sample

Description:

4/16/10

# 6 Oil Middle Source ID:

Date Completed:

Work Order: 10-0498

West Springfield Source

#6 Fuel As Fired

Madhu Shah, Laboratory Supervisor

Sample No: 21447

Comments

API Gravity @ 60oF 11.3 ASTM D-287

Specific Gravity @ 60oF 0.9909 ASTM D-287

Pounds per Gallon 8.261

Sulfur, % 0.84 ASTM D-1552

Ash,% 0.05 ASTM D-482

BTU/Lb 18,245 ASTM D-240

BTU/Gal 150,720 ASTM D-240

Parameter Results ASTM Methods 
Mt. Tom Generating Co. LLC

Analytical Laboratory

15 Agawam Avenue

West Springfield, MA 01089

Phone (413) 214-6541 Fax (413) 214-6842

email-madhu.shah@gdfsuezna.com

Date Taken:

Date Received:

3/30/10

4/1/10

Sample

Description:

4/16/10

# 6 Oil Top Source ID:

Date Completed:

Work Order: 10-0498

West Springfield Source

#6 Fuel As Fired

Madhu Shah, Laboratory Supervisor

Sample No: 21449

Comments

API Gravity @ 60oF 11.3 ASTM D-287

Specific Gravity @ 60oF 0.9909 ASTM D-287

Pounds per Gallon 8.261

Sulfur, % 0.84 ASTM D-1552

Ash,% 0.07 ASTM D-482

BTU/Lb 18,198 ASTM D-240

BTU/Gal 150,340 ASTM D-240

Parameter Results ASTM Methods
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPNAYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         27,234
<SECURITIES>                                   6,749
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,940
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               38,233
<PP&E>                                         2,260
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 41,153
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,365
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       138
<OTHER-SE>                                     71,856
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   41,153
<SALES>                                        4,380
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,380
<CGS>                                          503
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  503
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,212)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   39
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,251)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,251)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.09)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of 
Reunion Industries, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 33-77566) and on Form S-8 (File 
No. 33-77232) of our report dated August 15, 1996 on our audit of the 
consolidated financial statements of Data Packaging, Ltd. for the years ended 
April 28, 1996 and April 30, 1995, which report is included in this Form 8-K of 
Reunion Industries, Inc. dated December 3, 1996.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE


Hamilton, Bermuda
December 3, 1996
No. 11-9866.

#### Alston *v.*Washington.

Ct. App. Wash. Cer-tiorari denied.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 95-20755

Summary Calendar

_____________________

ANTHONY ROBINSON, CHAQUITHA NELSON

and CHARLOTTE HUNTER,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Appellee,

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT;

HENRY G. CISNEROS, Secretary,

in his capacity as Secretary

of Housing and Urban Development,

Defendants.

_______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for

the Southern District of Texas

 CA-H-93-3256 & CA-H-93-3228

_______________________________________________________

 May 6, 1996

Before REAVLEY, SMITH and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Upon review of the briefs of the parties, the record, and

the district court’s opinion, we AFFIRM for the reasons given by

the district court in his Order of Dismissal entered April 24,

1995.

AFFIRMED.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 30, 2022

No. 04-22-00772-CR

EX PARTE Jorge BECERRA-ORTIZ,

From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12255CR

Honorable Tully Shahan, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

 The clerk’s record in this appeal has been filed. The record reflects that on May 11, 

2022, appellant filed in the trial court an application for pretrial writ of habeas corpus. On 

September 9, 2022, appellant filed a notice of appeal, contending the trial court denied him relief 

on September 7, 2022. The clerk’s record does not contain a final order signed by the trial court. 

On September 14, 2022, the trial court signed a certification of defendant’s right to appeal 

stating, in part, that “I do not find where I have signed, or has been submitted to me for 

signature, an Order Denying Application for Pretrial Writ of Habeas Corpus and for Other 

Ancillary Matters,” although [a] notice of appeal has been [sic] filed.” This court contacted 

appellant’s attorney who stated there is no signed order in the case.

 It thus appears that this appeal is interlocutory and we have no jurisdiction over this 

appeal. Ex parte Evans, 611 S.W.3d 86, 88 (Tex. App.—Waco 2020, no pet.) (“Because there is 

no final order denying Evans’s application for writ of habeas corpus to be appealed, we therefore 

lack jurisdiction to entertain Evans’s appeal from such order.”); Ex parte Kietzman, No. 04-14-

00106-CR, 2014 WL 1319387, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Apr. 2, 2014, no pet.) (per 

curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (“Indeed, there is no final order signed by the 

trial court in the clerk’s record. It thus appears that this appeal is interlocutory and that we have 

no jurisdiction over this appeal.”).

 We therefore ORDER appellant to show cause in writing, no later than December 12, 

2022, why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant fails to 

respond by December 12, 2022, this appeal will be subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction. 

All other appellate deadlines are held in abeyance pending further order of this court.

_________________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 30th day of November, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
#### Andrew G. CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-35247

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed December 21, 2017

Andrew G. Clark, Pro Se

Sharon C. Peters, Attorney, Lewis Bris-bois Bisgaard *&*Smith LLP, Portland, OR, *352Christian Joseph Rowley, Esquire, Attorney, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellee Wells Fargo Bank, NA

Lauren Sommers, Benjamin James Miller, Attorneys, City of Eugene, Eugene, OR, for Defendant-Appellee City of Eugene

Cecil Reniche-Smith, Assistant Attorney General, AGOR — Office of the Oregon Attorney General (Salem), Salem, OR, for Defendants-Appellees State of Oregon, Alex Gardner, Eric Hasselman

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Andrew G. Clark appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, alleging constitutional and statutory violations related to his arrest and prosecution for criminal stalking. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

In his opening brief, Clark failed to challenge the district court’s orders dismissing his claims against defendants, and therefore Clark waived any challenge to such orders. *See Smith v. Marsh,*194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[Arguments not raised by a party in its opening brief are deemed waived.”); *Greenwood v. FAA,*28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir. 1994) (“We will not manufacture arguments for an appellant, and a bare assertion does not preserve a claim.... ”).

Clark’s motions for judicial notice (Docket Entry Nos. 13, 18, 50 and 54) and motion to compel (Docket Entry No. 40) are denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997             MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                          22,205                  22,671
<SECURITIES>                                    50,557                  49,716
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,486                  12,855
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                91,505                  90,567
<PP&E>                                           8,093                   8,310
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 100,233                  99,501
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,800                  18,105
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            34                      34
<OTHER-SE>                                      84,194                  81,157
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   100,233                  99,501
<SALES>                                         16,561                   4,402
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,485                   4,709
<CGS>                                            1,714                     369
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,930                   4,129
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (607)                   (119)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,448                     330
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,690                     132
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,758                     198
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07                     .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07                     .01
        

</TABLE>
No. 11-1382.

#### Crawford et al. *v.*BNSF Railway Co.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.