alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 292

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 10, 1998

Received and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Calling for an end to the recent conflict between Eritrea

and Ethiopia, and for other purposes.

Whereas the 1991 ouster of the Mengistu dictatorship led to

relative peace and stability in Eritrea and Ethiopia;

Whereas in 1993 Eritrea became independent after an internationally supervised referendum and the Government of

Ethiopia accepted the result of the referendum;
2

• HCON 292 RFS

Whereas the Governments of Eritrea and Ethiopia have

worked closely on a wide range of issues over the past

several years;

Whereas the Governments of Eritrea and Ethiopia enjoy

warm relations with the United States;

Whereas on May 6, 1998, a military confrontation erupted

between Eritrea and Ethiopia, resulting in the deaths of

hundreds of innocent civilians and the displacement of

tens of thousands of people;

Whereas the peoples of Eritrea and Ethiopia have suffered

for decades due to war and manmade famines and do not

deserve once again to suffer due to armed conflict;

Whereas the conflict between Eritrea and Ethiopia could destabilize the entire subregion and lead to a massive humanitarian crisis;

Whereas the Governments of Eritrea and Ethiopia have both

stated that they are committed to a peaceful resolution

of the conflict; and

Whereas the Governments of the United States and Rwanda,

as well as countries in the region, have put forth proposals for resolving the conflict: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) calls on both Eritrea and Ethiopia imme4 diately to bring an end to the violence between the

5 two countries;

6 (2) commends the executive branch of the

7 United States Government for brokering a morato8 rium on air raids between Eritrea and Ethiopia;
3

• HCON 292 RFS

1 (3) commends the recent efforts of the United

2 States facilitation team to resolve the crisis, and en3 courages continued United States engagement to4 ward a peaceful resolution of the conflict; and

5 (4) calls on President Isaias Afewerki and

6 Prime Minister Meles Zenawi to end the conflict

7 peacefully before it escalates into a full-scale war.

Passed the House of Representatives September 9,

1998.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
The State of



# Fourth Court of Appeals
**San Antonio, Texas**

October 1, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00565

- CR

Rodolfo Martinez SALINAS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2009

- CRP

- 000403

- D1
Hono rable Elma T. Salinas

- Ender, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The reporter’s record was originally due on August 18, 2014. On August 26, 2014, Jessica Ramirez, a court reporter responsible for filing a portion of the reporter’s record in this appeal

, filed a notification of late record. On the same day, we granted Ms. Ramirez’s request for
an extension of time to fil e the repo rter’s record to September 17, 2014. Howeve r, as of the date of this order, Ms. Ramirez has not filed a second notifica tion of late record, nor has she file d the report er’s record.

We, therefore, ORDER Jessica Ramirez to file the reporter’ s record no later than
October 29 , 2014 . If the reporter’ s record is not received by such date, an o rder may be issued directing Ms. Ramirez to appear and show cause why s he should not be held in contempt for failing to file the reporter’s record.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereu nto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 1st day of October, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle
Clerk of Court
No. 11-1226.

#### Garcia-Torres *v.*Holder, Attorney General.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER



I, Lishan Aklog, M.D., certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of PAVmed Inc.;
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: April 10,
    2017 | By: | /s/ Lishan Aklog, M.D.                                                           
|------------------------ | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |     | Lishan Aklog, M.D., Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer)
**EXHIBIT ITEM 32.2**

 

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

 

The certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

 

February 8, 2011

 

Bruce N. Warner, the Chief Financial Officer of Northern California Bancorp, Inc. certifies:

 

c.               that this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

d.              that information contained in this Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Northern California Bancorp, Inc.

 

 
|   | /s/   Bruce N. Warner         |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   | Bruce N. Warner               |
|   | Chief   Financial Officer and |
|   | Principal Accounting Officer  |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 12.1

               STATEMENT SETTING FORTH DETAIL FOR COMPUTATION OF
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                             (MILLIONS OF DOLLARS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   THREE MONTHS
                                                                       ENDED
                                                                     MARCH 31,                  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                                   ------------   -----------------------------------------------
                                                                       2002         2001       2000      1999       1998     1997
                                                                      -----        -----     ------     -----      -----    -----
<S>                                                                <C>            <C>        <C>       <C>        <C>       <C>
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes...       $ (73)       $(221)    $  693     $(104)     $  89    $ 456
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense, gross......................................         153          495        627       717        385      103
  Portion of rentals representative of interest................          10           44         46        53         35       19
                                                                      -----        -----     ------     -----      -----    -----
     Total fixed charges before capitalized interest...........         163          539        673       770        420      122
  Capitalized interest.........................................           2            3         --        --         --        5
                                                                      -----        -----     ------     -----      -----    -----
     Total fixed charges including capitalized interest........         165          542        673       770        420      127
                                                                      -----        -----     ------     -----      -----    -----
Earnings before fixed charges..................................       $  90        $ 318     $1,366     $ 666      $ 509    $ 578
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(a)..........................          --           --        2.0        --        1.2      4.6
                                                                      =====        =====     ======     =====      =====    =====
</TABLE>

(a)  For the three months ended March 31, 2002 and for the years ended December
     31, 2001 and 1999, earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $75
     million, $224 million and $104 million, respectively.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24
- 6546

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. AHMED SALA ALI BURALE, a/k/a Ahmed Salah Ali, Ahmed Hindi, Ahmed Salah Ali Burle , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Rebecca Beach Smith, Senior District Judge. ( 2:11

- cr - 00034

- RBS

- DEM

- 13 )

Submitted : September 1 2 , 2024 Decided: September 16, 2024

Before THACKER and RUSHING, Circuit Judge s , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Ahmed Sala Ali Burale , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6546 Doc: 7 Filed: 09/16/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Ahmed Sala Ali Burale appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to Part B, Subpart 1, of Amendment 821 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We conclude that the district court adequately explai ned its reasons for denying Burale’s motion and that the court did not abuse its discretion in finding that Burale was ineligible for relief. See United States v.
Martin , 916 F.3d 389, 395 (4th Cir. 2019) (stating standard s ). Accordingly, we affirm the d istrict court’s judgment. United States v. Burale , No. 2:11

- cr - 00034

- RBS

- DEM

- 13 (E.D. Va. May 10, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 24-6546 Doc: 7 Filed: 09/16/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                      5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TALK VISUAL
CORPORATION'S BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 AND THE STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS, STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE PERIOD THEN ENDED, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                   609699
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                             64989
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                              138028
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        1167832
<PP&E>                                 12289337
<DEPRECIATION>                           480724
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         14351275
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   1118898
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                 469
<COMMON>                                  50638
<OTHER-SE>                              7805018
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           14351275
<SALES>                                  113474
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         739888
<CGS>                                    476685
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        2139150
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       323886
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (2199234)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (2199234)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          122347
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                           (2076887)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (0.05)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.1












Alaia Capital, LLC


10 Corbin Drive


Darien, Connecticut 06820


 


October 10, 2017


 


Alaia Market Linked Trust, Series 4-3


Strategas Policy Basket Portfolio


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee


2 Hanson Place, 12th Floor


Brooklyn, New York 11217








	Re:	
Strategas Policy Basket Portfolio (the “Trust”)












 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


We have examined Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement (File No. 333-220579) for the above captioned Trust.  We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement of the references to Alaia Capital, LLC as evaluator.


 


You are hereby authorized to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 







 


	 	
Very truly yours,


	 	 	 
	 	
Alaia Capital, LLC


	 	 	 
	 	
By:

	
/s/ Oscar Loynaz


	 	 	
Name: Oscar Loynaz


	 	 	
Title:  Managing Director
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-11-000050309-MAY-201208:41 AM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMO
SENTRON INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 28,
1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                          26,556
<SECURITIES>                                     6,687
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,313
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,046
<INVENTORY>                                     10,725
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,723
<PP&E>                                           3,484
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,473
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 104,506
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,343
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            99
<OTHER-SE>                                      80,728
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   104,506
<SALES>                                         51,546
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,546
<CGS>                                           30,931
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,931
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,454
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   286
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 490
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,722
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,174
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,548
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,548
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 11-9759.

#### Varner *v.*Sisto, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Do SOUVANARATANA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-7189

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 22, 2018

Decided: February 26, 2018

Do Souvanaratana, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Do Souvanaratana seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Souvanaratana that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. *Wright v. Collins,*766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); *see also Thomas v. Arn,*474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). Souvanaratana has waived appellate review by failing to timely file objections. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1414
ANDREW SHANNON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:06-cv-00413-JRS) Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 17, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Curtis McKinley Hairston, Jr., THE GEE LAW FIRM, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Robert F. McDonnell, Attorney General of Virginia, Maureen Riley Matsen, Deputy Attorney General, Peter R. Messitt, Senior Assistant Attorney General/Chief, Gregory C. Fleming, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Andrew Shannon appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s summary judgment motion on his retaliation claim brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. See Shannon v. Virginia Dep’t of Juvenile Justice , No. 3:06-cv00413-JRS (E.D. Va. Apr. 4, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 224 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con. Res.224
                                      Agreed to October 21, 1998        

                       One Hundred Fifth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  eight

                          Concurrent Resolution

Whereas many children in the United States have been abducted by family 
  members who are foreign nationals and living in foreign countries;

Whereas children who have been abducted by an estranged father are very 
  rarely returned, through legal remedies, from countries that only 
  recognize the custody rights of the father;

Whereas there are at least 140 cases that need to be resolved in which 
  children have been abducted by family members and taken to foreign 
  countries;

Whereas, although the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International 
  Child Abduction, done at the Hague on October 25, 1980, has made 
  progress in aiding the return of abducted children, the Convention 
  does not address the criminal aspects of child abduction, and there 
  is a need to reach agreements regarding child abduction with 
  countries that are not parties to the Convention; and

Whereas decisions on awarding custody of children should be made in the 
  children's best interest, and persons who violate laws of the United 
  States by abducting their children should not be rewarded by being 
  granted custody of those children: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress urges international cooperation in working to resolve 
those cases in which children in the United States are abducted by 
family members who are foreign nationals and taken to foreign 
countries, and in seeing that justice is served by holding accountable 
the abductors for violations of criminal law.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
NO. 07-05-0364-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL C

	MARCH 24, 2006

		______________________________

	GEORGE S. MANNING, M.D., APPELLANT

	V.

	LUIS ORNELAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 286TH DISTRICT COURT OF COCHRAN COUNTY;

	NO. 03-08-3824; HONORABLE HAROLD PHELAN, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and HANCOCK, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	George S. Manning, M.D., appellant, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal because he no longer wishes to pursue it based on the full and final satisfaction and release of the trial court’s judgment.  No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion.  Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).   No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

						Mackey K. Hancock

						         Justice