alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Management and Budget

# AGENCY:

Office of Management and Budget, Executive Office of the President.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to The Executive Office of the President Appropriations Act, 2022, the Office of Management and Budget is publishing the current delegation of apportionment authority.

# DATES:

This delegation became effective on March 24, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Heather V. Walsh at 202-395-3642 or                         *MBX.OMB.OGC@omb.eop.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Delegation of Apportionment Authority

I hereby delegate to each Deputy Associate Director (DAD) the authorities delegated by the President to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget for apportioning funds pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1513.

In the event that a DAD is on leave and therefore unable to apportion funds, the authority for apportioning funds is hereby delegated to the individual serving as the Acting DAD.

This delegation supersedes any previous delegation of such authority, and shall remain in effect until revoked. This delegation does not limit the authority of the Director to exercise the delegated authority.

Shalanda D. Young,

Director, Office of Management and Budget.

[FR Doc. 2022-06873 Filed 3-31-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3110-01-P
(logo) CWCapital

ASSETMANAGEMENT

 

 

**AnnualStatement as to Compliance**

**Forthe Period of January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016**

** **

 

**WFRBS2014-C25**

 

 

Inaccordance with Item 1123 of Regulation AB and with the requirements detailedin §11.12 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the“Agreement”) for the above-mentioned CMBS pool, (the “CMBSPool”), CWCapital Asset Management LLC (“CWCAM”), in itscapacity as Special Servicer, is providing this Officer’s Certificatewith respect to the following:

 

(A)a review of CWCAM’s activities during the preceding calendar year orportion thereof (the “Reporting Period”) and of CWCAM’sperformance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’ssupervision and;

 

(B)to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, CWCAM hasfulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

Shouldyou have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

 

Sincerely,

CWCapitalAsset Management LLC

 

/s/David B. Iannarone

DavidB. Iannarone

President

 

 

7501Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 500 West, Bethesda, MD 20814

www.cwcapital.com
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

Participant:                 
                                         
                                        

Stifel Financial Corp. 

Restricted Stock Unit 

Modification of Award 

The Participant was awarded the following Stock Units under the Stifel Financial Corp. 2001 Incentive Stock Plan (the “Plan”) in
accordance with the Stifel Financial Corp. Wealth Accumulation Plan (the “SWAP”) (the “Award”): 
  

					
	 	 	 
	 Dates on Which
 RSUs Vest
and Are
 Payable
	  	 Number of Shares Receivable at

Such Date Prior to any Net
 Settlement for Tax
Purposes
	  	 RSUs received as “normal” SWAP

Deferral (as opposed to retention
 stock
and recruiting awards)

		  		  	
		  		  	
		  		  	
		  		  	
		  		  	
		  		  	
	     
	  	 	  	 

 The Award is hereby modified as follows: 

In lieu of the of the issuance of that number of shares of Common Stock under the SWAP in the future pursuant to the Award, Participant accepts Shares of
Restricted Stock subject to the Stifel Financial Corp 2017 Restricted Stock Award Agreement, which such award agreement is incorporated herein by reference (the “Award Agreement”), subject to the applicable terms of the Plan. 

Restrictions on the shares of Restricted Stock shall lapse on the respective date or dates corresponding to the original vesting date or dates applicable to
the corresponding shares specified above that are subject to this modification (a “Lapse of Restriction Date”). For example, a right to receive a share of stock pursuant to a Stock Unit that is scheduled to vest on December 31, 2019
is satisfied in full by the transfer of a share of Restricted Stock with a Lapse of Restriction Date on December 31, 2019. 

  
 1 








 Participant shall file a timely effective election under Section 83 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as
a condition of receiving implementing this Modification of Award. In the absence of such an election, this Modification of Award shall not become effective without further action by the Stifel Financial Corp. (the “Company”). 

This Modification of Award shall be subject to the terms and conditions prescribed in the Plan and in the Award Agreement, which includes provisions for net
settling shares of Restricted Stock to satisfy various tax withholding obligations. 
 Participant acknowledges that Participant executed this
Modification of Award voluntarily and has not relied on the Company or any of its affiliates, employees or agents for tax advice, and Participant has been advised to seek the advice of its own advisors with respect hereto. 

This Modification of Award shall become effective only if and when accepted by the Company, which acceptance shall be evidenced by the transfer of the shares
of Restricted Stock described above to the Participant on the books and records of the Company. 

 

This document constitutes part of the prospectus covering 

securities that have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Participant has executed this Modification of Award on this      day of December, 2017.

  

			
	 PARTICIPANT
	 	


			
		
	 By:
	 	 


			
	 Name (printed):
	 	 


  
 2
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 20565 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
GABRIEL ARREDONDO CARRILLO, also known as Gabriel Arredondo

Carrillo, also known as Gabriel Arrendondo , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13

- CR

- 0288

- 1

Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Gabriel Arredondo Carrillo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flore s , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Arredondo Carrillo h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 29, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-20565 Document: 00512751723 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2014No. 13

- 20565

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issu e for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-20565 Document: 00512751723 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/29/2014
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 25

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 9 (legislative day, JANUARY 7), 1997

Received

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making technical corrections to the Omnibus Consolidated

Appropriations Act, 1997 (Public Law 104–208), and

for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. Title III of the Departments of Com4 merce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Related
2

HJ 25 RDS

1 Agencies Appropriations Act, 1997 (as contained in DIVI2 SION A, TITLE I—OMNIBUS APPROPRIATIONS,

3 section 101(a) of the Omnibus Consolidated Appropria4 tions Act, 1997, Public Law 104–208) is amended under

5 the heading ‘‘COURTS OF APPEALS, DISTRICT COURTS,

6 AND OTHER JUDICIAL SERVICES—DEFENDER SERVICES’’

7 by striking ‘‘attorneys ap-’’ at the end and inserting the

8 following: ‘‘attorneys appointed to represent jurors in civil

9 actions for the protection of their employment, as author10 ized by 28 U.S.C. 1875(d); $308,000,000, to remain avail11 able until expended as authorized by 18 U.S.C.

12 3006A(i).’’. The foregoing amendment shall be considered

13 for all purposes to have taken effect on the date of enact14 ment of Public Law 104–208, and any actions taken prior

15 to the date of enactment of this section on the basis that

16 Public Law 104–208 should be interpreted as if it in17 cluded the amendment made by this section, if otherwise

18 valid, are ratified and approved by Congress.

19 SEC. 2. Title I of the Departments of Labor, Health

20 and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agen21 cies Appropriations Act, 1997 (as contained in DIVISION

22 A, TITLE I—OMNIBUS APPROPRIATIONS, section

23 101(e) of the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act,

24 1997, Public Law 104–208) is amended under the heading

25 ‘‘EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION—STATE
3

HJ 25 RDS

1 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE AND EMPLOYMENT SERVICE

2 OPERATIONS’’ by striking ‘‘$23,452,000’’ and inserting

3 ‘‘$173,452,000’’.

4 SEC. 3. Funds available for title IV–A–1 of the Ele5 mentary and Secondary Education Act in title III of the

6 Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and

7 Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act,

8 1997 (as contained in DIVISION A, TITLE I—OMNI9 BUS APPROPRIATIONS, section 101(e) of the Omnibus

10 Consolidated Appropriations Act, 1997, Public Law 104–

11 208) under the heading ‘‘SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PRO12 GRAMS’’ shall also be available for title IV–A–2 of the Ele13 mentary and Secondary Education Act: Provided, That,

14 of the funds under these headings in that Act available

15 July 1, 1997, through September 30, 1998, $25,000,000

16 shall instead be available October 1, 1996, through Sep17 tember 30, 1997.

18 Passed the House of Representatives January 9,

19 1997.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
No. 11-1376.

#### Field *v.*Board of Water Commissioners for the City and County of Denver.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-10833.

#### Larson *v.*California.

Sup. Ct. Cal. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed

August 26, 2014
.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14
- 14
- 00669
- CR
NO. 14
- 14
- 00670
- CR

IN RE DECARLOS MONTR AY GARRETT , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 338th District C ourt Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 0 870048 and 0886344


### MEMORANDUM OPINION On August 18, 2014, relator Decarlos Montray Garrett filed a petition for writ of m andamus in this court pertaining to two underlying criminal cases. See Tex. Gov’t Co de § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks2

this c ourt to compel the Honorable Brock Thomas , presiding judge of the 338th District Court of Harris County , to rule on a motion for post

- conviction forensic DNA testing pursuant to Chapter 64 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure

. T o be entitled to mandamus relief with respect to a criminal law matter, relator must show that he has no adequate remedy at law to redress his alleged harm, and that what he seeks to compel is a minister ial act. In re State ex rel. Weeks , 391 S.W.3d 117, 122 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (orig. proceeding). “[A] trial court has a ministerial duty to rule upon a motion that is properly and timely presented to it for a ruling . . . .” In re State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Appeals at Texarkana , 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (orig. proceeding). Thus, in appropriate cases, mandamus may issue to compel a trial court to act on a motion. Relator, however, has not demonstrated his entitl ement to mandamus relief. “The relator generally must bring forward all that is necessary to establish a claim for relief.” In re Potts , 399 S.W.3d 685, 686 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 2013, orig. proceeding); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k)(1)(a), 52 .7(a)(1). Although relator asserts in his petition that he filed a motion for DNA testing, relator includes no documentation in his appendix demonstrating that such a motion was filed with the trial court, let alone brought to the trial court’ s attention. There is no basis for this court to conclude on the limited information filed by relator that the trial court has failed or refused to perform a ministerial duty. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.3 PER CURIAM
Panel c onsists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Busby. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 298 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con. Res.298
                                         Agreed to July 23, 1998        

                       One Hundred Fifth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  eight

                          Concurrent Resolution

 

Whereas during June and July 1998, wild land fires destroyed 
  approximately 500,000 acres of land in northeast and central Florida, 
  having an aggregate value of more than $276,000,000;

Whereas the fires have affected 67 counties in the State of Florida;

Whereas the President of the United States issued a major disaster 
  declaration for the State of Florida;

Whereas the fires have damaged at least 367 homes and 33 businesses;

Whereas the fires have caused business closures and have aggravated 
  drought conditions, which will have a long-term impact on the economy 
  of the region;

Whereas the fires have caused injuries to at least 95 people, the 
  majority of whom are firefighters;

Whereas approximately 7,000 firefighters from 46 States have braved 
  extreme conditions to assist firefighters in Florida in fighting the 
  fires;

Whereas many agencies of or established by the Federal Government, 
  including the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Forest 
  Service, the Department of Defense, the Department of Transportation, 
  AmeriCorps, the Small Business Administration, the General Services 
  Administration, the National Guard, the American National Red Cross, 
  and the Civil Air Patrol, have contributed vital support functions in 
  response to the fires; and

Whereas many State and local government agencies have also contributed 
  vital support functions in response to the fires: Now, therefore, be 
  it

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
        (1) expresses deepest condolences to the State and people of 
    Florida for the losses suffered as a result of the wild land fires 
    occurring in June and July 1998;
        (2) expresses support to the State and people of Florida as 
    they overcome the effects of the fires;
        (3) commends the heroic efforts of firefighters from across the 
    Nation in battling the fires; and
        (4) commends the many agencies of or established by the Federal 
    Government and the many State and local government agencies that 
    have contributed vital support functions in response to the fires.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 120 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                 Union Calendar No. 367
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 120

                          [Report No. 105-653]

Disapproving the extension of the waiver authority contained in section 
        402(c) of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to Vietnam.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 1998

Mr. Rohrabacher (for himself, Mr. Gilman, and Mr. Smith of New Jersey) 
 introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

                             July 29, 1998

Reported adversely from the Committee on the Ways and Means, committed 
  to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and 
                         ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
Disapproving the extension of the waiver authority contained in section 
        402(c) of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to Vietnam.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress does not approve 
the extension of the authority contained in section 402(c) of the Trade 
Act of 1974 recommended by the President to Congress on June 3, 1998, 
with respect to Vietnam.
                                     





                                                 Union Calendar No. 367

105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             H. J. RES. 120

                          [Report No. 105-653]

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Disapproving the extension of the waiver authority contained in section 
        402(c) of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to Vietnam.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 29, 1998

 Reported adversely from the Committee on Ways and Means, committed to 
the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered 
                             to be printed`
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Brian E. Schaaf, certify that:

 

1.                                    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2014-C (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.

 
| Dated   March 18, 2015 |                                               |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                        |                                               |
|                        |                                               |
|                        | /s/   Brian E. Schaaf                              |
|                        | Brian   E. Schaaf                                  |
|                        | Vice   President and Assistant Treasurer           |
|                        | Ford   Motor Credit Company LLC, as Servicer       |
|                        | (senior   officer in charge of servicing function) |

 

----