alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Michael HOLLOWAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lieutenant TAYLOR, correction officer; Officer Bradley, correction officer, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-7228

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 30, 2018

Decided: February 2, 2018

Michael Holloway, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret Hoehl O’Shea, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Holloway appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Holloway v. Taylor,*No. 1:16-cv-00410-LMB-MSN, 2017 WL 3485045 (E.D. Va. Aug. 14, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Tony Tong, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB of PacificNet Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of PacificNet Inc.

         I, Shao Jian Wang, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB of PacificNet Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2005
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of PacificNet Inc.

By: /s/ Tony Tong
   Tony Tong
   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
   (Principal Executive Officer)

By: /s/ Shao Jian Wang
   Shao Jian Wang
   Chief Financial Officer
   (Principal Accounting Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 295 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 295

    To designate October 18, 1996, as ``National Mammography Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 18, 1996

    Mr. Biden (for himself, Mr. Abraham, Mr. Akaka, Mr. Baucus, Mr. 
 Bingaman, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Bradley, Mr. Bryan, Mr. Burns, Mr. Chafee, 
 Mr. Cohen, Mr. Coverdell, Mr. D'Amato, Mr. Domenici, Mr. Dorgan, Mr. 
Feingold, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Ford, Mr. Frist, Mr. Glenn, Mr. Grassley, 
 Mr. Gregg, Mr. Hatch, Mrs. Hutchison, Mr. Inouye, Mr. Johnston, Mrs. 
  Kassebaum, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Levin, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. 
   Lott, Mr. Mack, Mr. McCain, Ms. Mikulski, Ms. Moseley-Braun, Mr. 
Moynihan, Mr. Murkowski, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Pell, Mr. Reid, Mr. Robb, Mr. 
 Rockefeller, Mr. Roth, Mr. Sarbanes, Mr. Simon, Mr. Smith, Ms. Snowe, 
Mr. Specter, Mr. Stevens, Mr. Thomas, Mr. Thurmond, and Mr. Wellstone) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                            on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    To designate October 18, 1996, as ``National Mammography Day''.

Whereas, according to the American Cancer Society, 184,300 women will be 
        diagnosed with breast cancer in 1996, and 44,300 women will die from 
        this disease;
Whereas, in the decade of the 1990's, it is estimated that about 2,000,000 women 
        will be diagnosed with breast cancer, resulting in nearly 500,000 
        deaths;
Whereas the risk of breast cancer increases with age, with a woman at age 70 
        having twice as much of a chance of developing the disease than a woman 
        at age 50;
Whereas at least 80 percent of the women who get breast cancer have no family 
        history of the disease;
Whereas mammograms, when operated professionally at a certified facility, can 
        provide a safe and quick diagnosis;
Whereas experts agree that mammography is the best method of early detection of 
        breast cancer, and early detection is the key to saving lives; and
Whereas mammograms can reveal the presence of small cancers of up to 2 years or 
        more before regular clinical breast examination or breast self-
        examination (BSE), saving as many as 30 percent more lives: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate designates October 18, 1996, as 
``National Mammography Day''. The Senate requests that the President 
issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to 
observe such day with appropriate programs and activities.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 11
                               THERMO SENTRON INC.


                        Computation of Earnings per Share


                               Three Months Ended       Six Months Ended
                            ----------------------   ---------------------
                              June 28,    June 29,     June 28,   June 29,
                                  1997        1996         1997       1996
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Computation of Primary
      Earnings per Share:

    Net Income (a)          $1,642,000  $1,460,000   $2,990,000 $2,202,000
                            ----------  ----------   ---------- ----------
    Shares:
      Weighted average
        shares outstanding   9,875,000   9,846,154    9,875,000  8,423,077

      Add: Shares issuable
           from assumed
           exercise of
           options (as 
           determined by
           the application
           of the treasury
           stock method)             -           -            -     13,500
                            ----------  ----------   ---------- ----------
      Weighted average
        shares outstanding,
        as adjusted (b)      9,875,000   9,846,154    9,875,000  8,436,577
                            ----------  ----------   ---------- ----------
    Primary Earnings per
      Share (a) / (b)       $      .17  $      .15   $      .30 $      .26
                            ==========  ==========   ========== ==========
EXHIBIT 11 TO FORM 10-Q

                 BF ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

            COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (UNAUDITED)

               (in thousands, except per share amounts)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                              Three Months Ended       Six Months Ended
                                                   June 30,                 June 30,
                                               -----------------       ----------------
                                               1997         1996       1997        1996
                                               ----         ----       ----        ----
<S>                                       <C>         <C>       <C>         <C>     


Net Income                                    $ 716        $ 603    $ 1,561      $1,120
                                              -----        -----     ------       -----
                                              -----        -----     ------       -----
Weighted average number of
  shares outstanding:
Common stock                                  3,700        3,749      3,707       3,751
Common stock equivalents -
  stock options                                 387          292        356         269
                                              -----        -----      -----       -----
                                              4,087        4,041      4,063       4,020
                                              -----        -----      -----       -----
                                              -----        -----      -----       -----
Net income per share -
 based on weighted average number
 of shares of common stock
 and common stock equivalents                 $ .17        $ .15      $ .38       $ .28
                                              -----        -----      -----       -----
                                              -----        -----      -----       -----
<FN>                                          


(A)   A computation of fully diluted per share amounts has been omitted since
      there was no significant dilution during the periods reported.
</FN>
</TABLE>

                                    13
** **

**Exhibit34.2**

** **

**Reportof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Boardof Directors

Citibank,N.A.:

 

We have examined management’sassessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Assessment of Compliance, that the Agency and Trust division of Citibank,N.A. (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and ExchangeCommission’s Regulation AB for publicly-issued (*i.e.*, transaction-level reporting initially required under the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended) automobile loan or lease-backed securities serviced by American Honda Finance Corporation issuedon or after January 1, 2006 for which the Company provides trustee and paying agent services; or owner trustee services (the“Platform”), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(v), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii)-1122(d)(2)(vii),1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performswith respect to the Platform, as of and for the twelve months ended March 31, 2016. With respect to the Platform, servicingcriterion 1122(d)(3)(ii) is applicable only as it relates to remittances. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliancewith the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment about the Company’scompliance based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordancewith the attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)****and, accordingly, includedexamining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performingsuch other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactionsand securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whetherthe Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company duringthe period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either priorto or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the periodcovered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonablebasis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicingcriteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assessmentthat the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the twelve months ended March 31, 2016is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

Chicago, Illinois

May 27, 2016
# PENOBS COT NATION DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES JOHN 

## S BANKS DIRECTOR

Public Notice of

## Hearing and 12 yVABANAKI 

### WAY INDIAN ISLAND 

### ME 04468 TEL 

### 2078277776 FAX 

### 2078177466



## Request for

# Comments The Penobscot Indian 

### Nation Department ofNatural Resources 

# CNN 

# DNR has developed proposed Surface 

### Water Quality Standards

# WQS The purpose 

### of the proposed 

# WQS is to protect maintain and improve the quality 

### ofPenobscot 

### Waters for public and private drinking watersupplies to 

### promote the habitation 

### growth and propagation 

### of native and other desirable aquatic plant and animal life to protect existing and future 

### domestic cultural agricultural recreational 

### and industrial 

### uses and to protect any other existing 

### and future beneficial uses 

### of Penobscot 

### Waters including 

### economic uses 

### The 

## PIN 

# DNR is providing 

### an opportunity for the public to submit written 

### comments on the proposed 

# WQS The comment period will continue for 

### 60 days 

### from the date 

### ofpublication of this notice in the 

### Bangor Daily

## News that is through 

### August 11 

## 2014
In addition the 

### PIN

# DNR will hold apublic hearing atthe following date

### and location August 6th 

### 2014 Penobscot Nation 

### Community Building Indian Island 

### Maine The public hearing will be held 

### from 

## 6pm to 8

# pm to allow 

### members ofthe public to present their views orally if desired 

## You may contact the 

## PIN 

# DNR at

# 207 8177361 fora 

### copy

## ofthe proposed 

# WQS or with any questions concerning this notice Copies are also available atthe 

### PIN 

# DNR office 

### see address 

## below and 

### on the 

## PIN 

# DNR website at 

## wwwpenobscotnationorgDNRDNR1 Written 

### comments must be submitted 

### by August 11 2014 by mail

## email or in person 

### to 

## Dan Kosnierz Penobscot 

### Water Resources 

### Program Manager

Penobscot Indian

### Nation Department

### ofNatural Resources 12 

### Wabanaki 

## Way Indian Island

# ME 04468 DanKusnierzpenobscotnationorg

l00 Proeeise41 Chianme 111v
| (logo) WELLS            FARGO | CMBS Department

 

MAC N9401-011

1055 10th Avenue SE

Minneapolis, MN 55414 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2014-C19, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C19

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2014 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

March 1, 2016

/s/ Gail Vannest

GAIL VANNEST

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
EXHIBIT 32
                                   ----------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this
Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB  for  the  quarter ended June 30, 2004 fully
complies  with  the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange  Act  of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report
fairly  presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of  operations  of  the  Company.

This  7th  day  of  August,  2004.


/s/  Robert G. Peck
-------------------------------------
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/  Harle B. Green
-------------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


<PAGE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Adela Deann HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-50289 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 20, 2017

Joseph H, Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Adela Deann Hernandez, Pro Se

*279Before JONES, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Adela Deann Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Hernandez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
" ^ Stat e Representativ e 

# Da n Meye r Augus t 11,201 1 Aloh aLey , Associat e Directo r Smal l Communit y Ai r

Servic e Developmen t

Program.£

- , Unite d State s Departmen t o f Transportatio n Washington , D . C . 2059 0 ,- , b o 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenu e S E C 5 "o: , , _ Re : Rhinelander/Oneid aCounty Airport Gran t Proposa l '^> ' '-~^'^z ' C D C' ^ Dea r Ms . Ley , 1 i mwritin g i

n support o f th' ? Rbifelandef/Oneid aCoLLtitv

- Airport .nppl-.cntio

n for aSmal l Community Ai r

Servic e Grant . Th e Rhinelander/Oneid aCounty Airport recentl y los t

passenge r

air-carrie r

servic e tha t

ha d bee n provide d fo r

man y year s b y Delt aAirlines . I t i s m y understandin g tha t

Delt aAirline s undertoo k arestructurin g an d reduce d it s regiona l flee t o f aircraf t thu s discontinuin g servic e t o th e Rhinelander/Oneid aCounty Airport . A s aconsequenc e o f

thes e action s Rhinelander/Oneid aCounty Airpor t ha s los t th e majority o f

it s connectivit y with th e nationa l an d globa l ai r transportatio n system . Th e Rhinelander/Oneid a County Airpor t

managemen t

ha s identifie d asolutio n i n recruitin g ai r

servic e t o Chicago/O'Har e throug h ane w ai r

carrier . Airports , aviatio n an d aviation-relate d industrie s pla y asignifican t rol e i n th e economi c succes s o f Wisconsi n communities . T o ensur e ful l participatio n in th e worl d economy , Wisconsi n ha s develope d a

n advance d interconnecte d syste mo f highway , air , rai l an d wate r trave l tha t

ca n tak e peopl e an d good s fro mon e cit y t o an y destinatio n i n th e world . Assistanc e fromth e Smal l Community Ai r Servic e Gran t

woul d hel p attrac t

ane w airlin e carrie r b y deferrin g start

u p costs , an d provid e Rhinelander/Oneid aCounty Airpor t with eve n greate r globa l access . I appreciat e you r

consideratio n for

th e Rhinelander/Oneid aCounty Airport applicatio n fo r

th e Smal l Communit y Ai r

Servic e Gran t

an d endors e effort s t o reconnec t an d improv e Rhinelander/Oneid aCounty Airport t o th e res t

o f th e worl d an d th e worl d economy . Sincerely,

^ . Da n Meye r Stat e Representativ e 34" ^ Assembl y Distric t

Pos t Offic e Box 895 3 • Madison , Wisconsi n 53.708-895 3 • (608 ) 266-714 1 Fax : (608 ) 282-363 4 • Toll-fre e legislativ e hotline ; (888 ) 534-003 4 • Rep.MeyepS'legib.wi.go v
% Predict blood CPY and urine TCPY levels
% Drinking water concentrations from Orestimba Creek Site 3 120 days.xlsx
% Infants
% Cecilia Tan
% Jan 21, 2016


% Setting model parameters
use human_parameters_MRP
use preg_female_parameters
BWSW=1;		% Set BW to a fixed value
BWST=4.8;	% Set BW to 4.8 kg
PREG=0;		% Not pregnant
DT(1) = 0.0;
TSTOP=2880; 	% Exposure duration in hrs

%TO READ IN DOSES FROM AN EXCEL SPREADSHEET. must be saved as .xls
VOLUME=0.68557  % Water consumption volume in L/DAY
EVENTS=6        % Drinking frequency per day
DT = xlsRead("Drinkingwater.xls", "Creek", "D2:D722") ; % Dosing Times
AMTCDOSE=xlsRead("Drinkingwater.xls", "Creek", "E2:E722")*VOLUME/EVENTS; % Dose in ug/l 
prepare time rbcce cv urinetcpy cvo
start@nocallback

%Output RBC AChE, Urine TCPy, venous blood conc of CPF, venous blood conc of oxon
mytable = [_time _rbcce _urinetcpy _cv*350.6 _cvo*334.5]; % Output unit ug/L for concentrations
save mytable @file='orestimba_infant_01222016.txt' @format=ascii
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6961** 

RAFAEL ROMERO , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v.

WARDEN , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. J. Frederick Motz , Senior District Judge. ( 1:13

- cv
- 00036

- JFM )

Submitted : December 11, 2015 Decided: January 19, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD , and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Rafael Romero , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Rafael Romero seeks to appeal the district court’s decision
to return his motion for miscellaneous relief without docketing

it because the motion pertaine d to the filing fee in a case that

was closed in 2013

. This court may exercise jurisdiction only
over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (20 12 ), and certain
interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (20 12 ).

The decision Romero seeks to appeal is not an appealable judgment or order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack
of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately prese nted in the

materials before this court and argument would not ai d the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 11-1313.

#### Holland *v.*Michigan.

Ct. App. Mich. Certio-rari denied.