alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      The undersigned hereby certify that the Form 10-Q/A of Windswept
Environmental Group, Inc. for the period ended March 28, 2006, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Windswept
Environmental Group, Inc. for the periods presented.


                                           /s/ Michael O'Reilly
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name: Michael O'Reilly
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           (principal executive officer)


Date: October 19, 2006


                                           /s/ Arthur Wasserspring
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name: Arthur Wasserspring
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           (principal financial officer)


Date: October 19, 2006
Exhibit 32.2



STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Form 10-Q of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, I, Carolyn Jones, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs
Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(a) such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and



(b) the information contained in such Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company and its subsidiaries as of and for the periods presented in such Form
10-Q.



|    |  |                                                                            |  |  |  |       |  |            
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ----- |  | -----------
|    |  |                                                                            |  | 
|By: |  | /s/    Carolyn Jones                                                       |  |  |  | Date: |  | May 5, 2005
|    |  | Carolyn Jones Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |  |  |  |       |  |
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 69 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 69

Expressing the sense of the Congress with respect to the establishment 
 of waivers in State medical-licensing laws regarding the provision of 
                  health care to indigent individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 30, 1997

 Mr. Duncan (for himself, Mr. Bryant, Mr. Wamp, Mr. Hilleary, and Mr. 
   Tanner) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                 referred to the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Congress with respect to the establishment 
 of waivers in State medical-licensing laws regarding the provision of 
                  health care to indigent individuals.

Whereas a number of volunteer organizations operate programs to provide health 
        care to indigent individuals without imposing any charges on the 
        individuals;
Whereas the physicians who participate in such programs perform an important 
        service by providing health care to a segment of the population that 
        otherwise might not receive such care;
Whereas a physician who is willing to participate in such a program, although 
        licensed by one or more States, may be prohibited from participating in 
        the program by reason of not being licensed in the State in which the 
        program needs the physician to provide services;
Whereas, in most States, the laws regulating the practice of medicine do not 
        provide for the granting, to a physician who is not licensed in the 
        State, of a waiver that authorizes the physician to provide health care 
        to indigent individuals in the State; and
Whereas the State of Tennessee has enacted legislation that provides for such 
        waivers: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that each State should enact 
legislation that provides for the granting, to a physician who is not 
licensed to practice medicine in the State, of a waiver from the 
applicable licensing laws of the State in order to authorize the 
physician to provide health care to indigent individuals in the State, 
subject to the physician not imposing any charge for such care.
                                 <all>
```
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 47

To designate a flag-pole upon which the flag of the United States is to

be set at half-staff whenever a law enforcement officer is slain in the

line of duty.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 12, 1997

Mr. FOGLIETTA (for himself, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. SCHUMER,

Ms. NORTON, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. MANTON, Mrs. KELLY, Mr. RAMSTAD,

Mr. FROST, Mr. WOLF, Mr. KIND of Wisconsin, Mr. FILNER, Mr.

MCGOVERN, Mr. KLINK, Mr. WELLER, Mr. ROTHMAN, Mr. SMITH of

Washington, Mr. SAXTON, Mr. HALL of Texas, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr.

KLECZKA, and Mr. STUPAK) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To designate a flag-pole upon which the flag of the United

States is to be set at half-staff whenever a law enforcement officer is slain in the line of duty.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. INSTRUCTION.

4 (a) SLAIN LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS.—The

5 Capitol Police Board shall designate or establish a flag

6 pole upon which the flag of the United States shall be

7 flown at half-staff for one day whenever a Federal, State,
2

•HCON 47 IH

1 local, or territorial law enforcement officer is slain in the

2 line of duty.

3 (b) ESTABLISHMENT OF PROCEDURES.—The Capitol

4 Police Board shall establish efficient and effective proce5 dures to execute subsection (a), and to—

6 (1) ensure that the official responsible for set7 ting the flag of the United States is informed or

8 learns promptly of the slaying of any law enforce9 ment officer;

10 (2) post public notice in close proximity to the

11 flag being flown at half-staff of the name, tenure of

12 service, and jurisdiction of a slain law enforcement

13 officer being honored; and

14 (3) present the flag of the United States which

15 is flown at half-staff in honor of a slain law enforce16 ment officer to the family of the slain law enforce17 ment officer.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1333

JAMES LYONS; POLLY LYONS,

Petitioners,

v.

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Federal Energy 

Regulatory Commission. (2210-206)

Submitted: February 27, 2012 Decided: March 8, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William M. Stanley, Jr., STANLEY AND STANLEY LLC, Moneta, 

Virginia, for Petitioners. Michael A. Bardee, General Counsel, 

Robert H. Solomon, Solicitor, Holly E. Cafer, FEDERAL ENERGY 

REGULATORY COMMISSION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James and Polly Lyons (hereinafter “Petitioners”) 

petition this court for review of the Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission’s (“FERC”) order denying their request for rehearing 

on FERC’s prior notice denying as untimely Petitioners’ request 

for rehearing on a decision following staff action. For the 

reasons that follow, we deny the petition for review.

We will set aside FERC’s order only if we conclude 

that its denial of rehearing was “arbitrary, capricious, an 

abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law,”

see 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A) (2006), or “contrary to constitutional 

right, power, privilege, or immunity.” See 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(B) 

(2006). Further, we will defer to FERC’s reasonable 

interpretation of its regulations. See Ohio Valley Envtl. Coal.

v. Aracoma Coal Co., 556 F.3d 177, 193-94 (4th Cir. 2009).

Petitioners sought to file a belated request for 

rehearing on a letter ruling that FERC properly classified as a 

decision following staff action. See 18 C.F.R. § 385.1902(a)

(2012). A request for rehearing on such a decision must be 

filed within thirty days, which it was not. Id.; see also 18 

C.F.R. § 385.713(a)(1), (b) (2012) (mandating that a party seek 

rehearing from any final FERC decision “or other final order, if 

rehearing is provided for by statute, rule, or order”). In 

denying Petitioners’ request for rehearing, FERC rejected 
3

Petitioners’ various reasons to excuse the untimely filing of 

their request for rehearing. 

Based on our review of the record, as well as the 

governing statutes and regulations, we conclude that FERC’s 

decision to deny Petitioners’ belated request for rehearing was 

not arbitrary or capricious, violative of any law or 

constitutional right, or an abuse of FERC’s considerable 

discretion. In denying rehearing, FERC interpreted and applied 

the governing regulations in conformity with their plain 

meaning. See Ohio Valley Envtl. Coal., 556 F.3d at 193 

(explaining that, when regulation is unambiguous, the “plain 

language” of the regulation controls). Accordingly, we defer to 

FERC’s ruling and deny the petition for review. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph Irven POWELL, Jr., a/k/a Jody Powell, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6874

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 21, 2017

Decided: November 27, 2017

Joseph Irven Powell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Dickerson Kocher, Donald Russell Pender, Stephen Aubrey West, Seth Morgan Wood, Assistant United States Attorneys, Jennifer E. Wells, Special Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Irven Powell, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); see *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Powell has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Powell’s motion for a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the *260facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
**EXHIBIT32.2**

** **

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

** **

**Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

The undersigned executive officer of FirstFederal Bancshares of Arkansas, Inc. (the “Registrant”) hereby certifies thatthe Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the three months and nine months ended September30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained thereinfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.

 

 

 
|   | /s/ Sherri R.  Billings |
|--------|------------------------------|
|   | Sherri R. Billings           |
|   | EVP/Chief Financial  Officer |

 

Date: October 31, 2005

 

----
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 208

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding achomeownership opportunities. cess to affordable housing and expansion of
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 208

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) the priorities of our Nation should include

4 providing access to affordable housing that is safe,
2

•HCON 208 EH

1 clean, and healthy and expanding homeownership

2 opportunities; and

3 (2) these goals should be pursued through poli4 cies that—

5 (A) promote the ability of the private sec6 tor to produce affordable housing without exces7 sive government regulation;

8 (B) encourage tax incentives, such as the

9 mortgage interest deduction, at all levels of gov10 ernment; and

11 (C) facilitate the availability of capital for

12 homeownership and housing production, includ13 ing by continuing the essential roles carried out

14 by the Federal National Mortgage Association,

15 the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation,

16 and the Federal Home Loan Banks.

Passed the House of Representatives July 20, 1998.

Attest:

Clerk.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

               STATEMENT UNDER OATH OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                 AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER REGARDING FACTS
               AND CIRCUMSTANCES RELATING TO EXCHANGE ACT FILINGS

     I, Darren B. Miller state and attest that:

     1. To the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the covered reports
of ENCOMPASS SERVICES CORPORATION, a Texas corporation, and, except as corrected
or supplemented in a subsequent covered report:

     o    no covered report contained an untrue statement of a material fact as
          of the end of the period covered by such report (or in the case of a
          report on Form 8-K or definitive proxy materials, as of the date on
          which it was filed); and

     o    no covered report omitted to state a material fact necessary to make
          the statements in the covered report, in light of the circumstances
          under which they were made, not misleading as of the end of the period
          covered by such report (or in the case of a report on Form 8-K or
          definitive proxy materials, as of the date on which it was filed).

     2. I have reviewed the contents of this statement with the Company's audit
committee.

     3. In this statement under oath, each of the following, if filed on or
before the date of this statement, is a "covered report":

     o    Annual Report of Encompass Services Corporation on Form 10-K for
          fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, filed on March 14, 2002;

     o    all reports on Form 10-Q, all reports on Form 8-K and all definitive
          proxy materials of Encompass Services Corporation filed with the
          Commission subsequent to the filing of the Form 10-K identified above;
          and

     o    any amendments to any of the foregoing.

By:       /s/ Darren B. Miller
    ---------------------------------
Name:    Darren B. Miller
Title:   Sr. Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 9, 2002


         Subscribed and sworn to before me this 9th day of August, 2002

                                         /s/ Terri J. Allbright
                                         -----------------------------------
                                         Notary Public
                                         My Commission Expires: January 22, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the following meeting:

*Name and Committee Code:*                         Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee (#13883).                    

*Date and Time:*                         June 6, 2022; 12:00 p.m.-4:00 p.m. (Eastern).                    

*Place:*                         NSF, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314 (Virtual).                    

                        Attendance information for the meeting will be forthcoming on the website:                         *https://www.nsf.gov/​mps/​ast/​aaac.jsp.*

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                    

*Contact Persons:*                         Martin Still, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; Telephone: 703-292-4290.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations to the National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) on issues within the field of astronomy and astrophysics that are of mutual interest and concern to the agencies.                    

*Agenda:*                         To provide updates on Agency activities.                    

Dated: March 28, 2022.

Crystal Robinson,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2022-06770 Filed 3-30-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________

NO. 09-12-00239-CR

_________________

TOMMY HOLCOMB, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 221st District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 11-06-07078-CR

________________________________________________________________________

ORDER

On November 21, 2012, we remanded this case to the trial court for a hearing to

determine why counsel for the appellant failed to file a brief. The trial court conducted a 

hearing and found that there is good cause for counsel to withdraw. The trial court 

appointed new counsel to represent appellant.

The appeal is hereby reinstated. All appellate timetables shall resume from this 

date. Jarrod Walker is enrolled as counsel for appellant. The brief of the appellant is due 

February 9, 2013. 
2

ORDER ENTERED January 10, 2013. 

PER CURIAM

Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ.
Exhibit 35.1









| | Commercial
                                         Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120,
12th Floor
550
South Tryon Street
Charlotte,
NC 28202

1-800-326-1334
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







ANNUAL
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference
is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2014, by and among GS MORTGAGE SECURITIES
CORPORATION II, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as General Special
Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as Cypresswood Court Shopping Center Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as
Operating Advisor, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee,
with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-GC26 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms
used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant
to Section 10.07 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify
that:



| | 1. | A
                                         review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015
                                         through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance
                                         per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To
                                         the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all
                                         of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting
                                         Period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.





|/s/
    Daniel Bober        
|----------------------------
|Daniel
    Bober            
|Executive
    Vice President
|Wells
    Fargo Bank        









|Wells Fargo
    Bank, N.A | 
|------------------------- |