alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1

 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO TRANSITIONAL EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO TRANSITIONAL EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of December 15, 2017 (the “Effective Date”) by and between Midland States Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”), Midland States Bank, an Illinois banking corporation (the “Bank”) (the Bank and the Company hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Employer”), and Leon J. Holschbach (“Executive”).

 

RECITALS

 

A.            The Executive is currently employed as the Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company and Chief Executive Officer of the Bank and has entered into a Transitional Employment Agreement with the Company and the Bank, dated as of December 1, 2010, as amended by that certain Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement dated as of November 16, 2015 (the “Employment Agreement”).

 

B.            The Company’s Compensation Committee the Company’s Compensation Committee has approved, changes to the target Incentive Bonus and long-term incentive bonus percentages for the Executive.

 

C.            Since the date of the Employment Agreement the SEC has requested that all issuer’s subject to the reporting requirements of Securities Exchange Act of 1934 include a provision in the issuer’s employment agreements with respect certain rights of the employee to contact the SEC and other government agencies with respect to possible violations of the federal securities laws.

 

AGREEMENTS

 

1.              The reference in Section 4(b) of the Employment Agreement to a target Incentive Bonus is hereby amended to “not less than seventy percent (70%)”; and a new sentence shall be added as follows: “The long-term incentive bonus percentage for the Executive shall be seventy-five percent (75%).”

 

2.              A new Section 8(g) is hereby added to the Employment Agreement as follows:

 

(g)          Nothing contained herein shall impede Executive’s ability to communicate with the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission or other governmental agencies regarding possible federal securities law violations (i) without the Company’s prior approval, and (ii) without having to forfeit or forgo any resulting whistleblower awards.”

 

In all other respects the Employment Agreement shall remain fully in force and effect.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the Effective Date.

 

	
MIDLAND STATES BANCORP, INC. and MIDLAND STATES BANK
    	
 
    	
LEON J. HOLSCHBACH
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/ Douglas J. Tucker
    	
 
    	
/s/ Leon   J. Holschbach
    
	
Name:
    	
Douglas   J. Tucker 
    	
 
    	
[Signature]
    
	
Its:
    	
Senior vice   President, Corporate Counsel
#### Freddie MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant v. ENERGY TRANSFER PARTNERS, L.P., Defendant-Appellee

No. 17-20178

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 14, 2018

Marrick Armstrong, Ghazal Asrar Vaho-ra, Attorney, Smith Reed <& Armstrong, P.L.L.C., Pearland, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant

Kelley Riddle Edwards, Luke C. Mac-Dowall, Littler Mendelson, P.C., Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellee

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and OWEN, Circuit'Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The judgment of the district court is confirmed for the reasons covered completely by the district judge.

The Plaintiff claims that there is a fact issue as to whether he and Bozeman were treated differently because of their race. But the corrective forms with different signing had complete differences in origin and significance to their employment. Race had nothing to do with that, and Plaintiff has not presented any evidence of racial discrimination.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
No. 11-8978.

#### Moore et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
(logo) BERKADIA®

 

 

Annual Statement as to Compliance

For the Year Ended December31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”)

 

*COMM,*

*Series 2014-UBS6*

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 ofthe Pooling and Servicing Agreement governing the referenced transaction (the“Servicing Agreement”), I hereby attest that:

 

i. A review of the activitiesand performance of Berkadia as Subservicer during the period has been madeunder my supervision.

 

ii. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, Berkadia as Subservicer has fulfilled, in allmaterial respects, its obligations under this Subservicing Agreement throughoutthe period and no default by the Subservicer under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement has occurred and is continuing.

 

Berkadia,

 

/s/ Mark E. McCool

Mark E. McCool

President

February 10, 2017
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 89 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 89

Expressing the sense of Congress that the 2004 Summer Olympic Games be 
                    held in Cape Town, South Africa.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 22, 1997

  Ms. Furse (for herself, Ms. Waters, Mrs. Meek of Florida, Ms. Eddie 
 Bernice Johnson of Texas, Ms. McKinney, Mr. Hastings of Florida, Ms. 
Norton, Ms. Brown of Florida, Mrs. Clayton, Mr. Jackson, Mr. Hilliard, 
   Ms. Kilpatrick, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Mr. Fattah, Mr. Payne, Mr. 
 Towns, Mr. Ford, Mr. Rush, Mr. Scott, Mr. Watt of North Carolina, Mr. 
 Owens, Mr. Dellums, Mr. Stokes, Mr. Clyburn, Mr. Wynn, Mr. Dixon, Ms. 
 Millender-McDonald, Mr. Bishop, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, Ms. Carson, Mr. 
   Jefferson, Mr. Cummings, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Clay, Mr. Thompson, Mr. 
Flake, Mr. Rangel, Ms. Jackson-Lee, and Ms. Christian-Green) submitted 
    the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the 
                  Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of Congress that the 2004 Summer Olympic Games be 
                    held in Cape Town, South Africa.

Whereas the Olympic Games have never been held on the continent of Africa;
Whereas Africa, with 53 countries and with a population of more than 720 million 
        people, is ready to receive its first Olympic Games;
Whereas South Africa ended years of apartheid control in 1994 and elected a 
        government committed to democracy and the national unity of all its 
        citizens;
Whereas South Africa continues to promote national reconciliation among all 
        South Africans, and recognizes the capacity of sports to unify the 
        nation;
Whereas South Africa has adopted a constitution as the supreme law of the land 
        and through it guarantees democratic values, social justice, fundamental 
        human rights, and economic opportunities for all;
Whereas Cape Town, South Africa, is a modern city with a history, beauty, and 
        attractions to keep the world and visitors captivated for years to come; 
        and
Whereas South Africa's President, Nelson Mandela, who serves as the honorary 
        President of the Cape Town 2004 Olympic bid, has endorsed Cape Town's 
        bid for the 2004 Summer Olympic Games: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that the 2004 Summer Olympic Games 
be held in Cape Town, South Africa.
                                 <all>
```
#### COM. v. BROWN, A.

679 WDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/01/2017

CP-02-CR-0008971-2005 (Allegheny)

Affirmed
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 215 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 215

 Congratulating the people of the Co-operative Republic of Guyana for 
                     holding multiparty elections.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 1998

    Mr. Payne (for himself and Mr. Bishop) submitted the following 
     concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                        International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Congratulating the people of the Co-operative Republic of Guyana for 
                     holding multiparty elections.

Whereas the people of Guyana voted on December 15, 1997, to re-elect the ruling 
        party, the People's Progressive Party/Civic (PPP/Civic);
Whereas the Guyanese people showed their strong belief in the democratic process 
        by approximately an 88 percent voter turnout;
Whereas the main opposition party, the People's National Congress (PNC) has 
        alleged that the elections were not free and fair; and
Whereas although international observers such as the Organization of American 
        States (OAS), the Commonwealth, and the International Foundation of 
        Electoral Systems (IFES) have unanimously agreed, based on their 
        observations on election day, that the polling process was free and 
        fair, it has been alleged that violations occurred in the counting 
        process, necessitating an audit of the elections by the Caribbean 
        Community (CARICOM): Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) congratulates the people of Guyana for holding 
        multiparty presidential elections by proportional 
        representation;
            (2) supports the audit of the elections by the Caribbean 
        Community (CARICOM), an organization deemed acceptable to all 
        parties;
            (3) calls on all parties and opposition leaders to respect 
        the outcome of the audit as the final decision and make a vow 
        to peace and stability in Guyana; and
            (4) calls on the newly elected president of the Co-
        operative Republic of Guyana to respect the rule of law and 
        human rights.
                                 <all>
```
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 351

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives

of the bill H.R. 3910.to make a technical correction in the enrollment
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 351

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R.

3 3910) to authorize the Automobile National Heritage Area

4 in the State of Michigan, and for other purposes, the Clerk
2

•HCON 351 EH

1 of the House of Representatives shall strike section 406

2 and insert the following new section 406:

3 SEC. 406. TERMINATION OF CORRIDOR COMMISSION.

4 Section 9(a) of such Act (102 Stat. 4556) is amended

5 by striking ‘‘on the day occurring 5 years after the date

6 of the enactment of this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘on November

7 18, 2003’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 15,

1998.

Attest:

Clerk.
IA

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 103

Waiving certain enrollment requirements with respect to certain specified

bills of the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 8, 1997

Mr. ARMEY introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on House Oversight

JOINT RESOLUTION

Waiving certain enrollment requirements with respect to

certain specified bills of the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the provisions of sections 106 and 107 of title 1,

4 United States Code, are waived for the balance of the first

5 session of the One Hundred Fifth Congress with respect

6 to the printing (on parchment or otherwise) of the enroll7 ment of any bill or joint resolution making general appro8 priations for the fiscal year ending on September 30,

9 1998, or continuing appropriations for the fiscal year end10 ing on September 30, 1998. The enrollment of any such
2

•HJ 103 IH

1 bill or joint resolution shall be in such form as the Com2 mittee on House Oversight of the House of Representa3 tives certifies to be a true enrollment.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 74 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 74

    Commemorating the fiftieth anniversary of the liberation of the 
                    Auschwitz death camp in Poland.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 26 (legislative day, January 10), 1995

Mr. Bradley (for himself, Mr. D'Amato, Mr. Dole, Mr. Daschle, Mr. Pell, 
 Mr. Helms, Mr. Specter, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Feingold, Mr. Harkin, Mr. 
Baucus, and Ms. Mikulski) submitted the following resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Commemorating the fiftieth anniversary of the liberation of the 
                    Auschwitz death camp in Poland.

Whereas, on January 27, 1945, the Auschwitz extermination camp in Poland was 
        liberated by Allied Forces after almost five years of murder, rape, and 
        torture;
Whereas more than one million innocent civilians were murdered at Auschwitz 
        alone;
Whereas Auschwitz symbolizes the brutality of the Holocaust;
Whereas Americans must ``never forget'' this terrible crime against humanity and 
        must educate the generations to come so as to promote the understanding 
        of the dangers of intolerance in order to prevent similar injustices 
        from happening ever again; and
Whereas commemoration of the liberation of Auschwitz will instill in all 
        Americans a greater awareness of the Holocaust: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate hereby--
            (1) commemorates January 27, 1995, as the fiftieth 
        anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz death camp by 
        Allied Forces in the Second World War; and
            (2) calls upon all Americans to remember the more than one 
        million innocent victims who were murdered at Auschwitz as part 
        of the Holocaust.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                      Consent of Independent Accountants


The Board of Directors
C-COR.net Corp.:

We consent to the use of our audit report dated August 10, 2001, with respect to
the consolidated balance sheets of C-COR.net Corp. as of June 29, 2001 and June
30, 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and
shareholders' equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended June
29, 2001, incorporated herein by reference.

We also consent to the use of our audit report dated September 13, 2001, with
respect to the financial statement schedule of C-COR.net Corp. for the three-
year period ended June 29, 2001, incorporated herein by reference.

We also consent to the reference to our firm under the heading "Independent
Public Accountants" in the prospectus.

/s/ KPMG LLP
-------------
KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
December 20, 2001
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

TOMA Integrity, Inc.

, and John Dial, Appellant s

No. 06

- 19

- 00005

- CV v.

Windermere Oaks Water Supply Corporation, Appellee Appeal from the 33rd District Court of Burnet County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 47531 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Burgess and Justice Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant s , TOMA Integrity, Inc.

, and John Dial, pay all costs of

this appeal.

RENDERED JUNE 21, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### Jeffrey ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ACE HARDWARE CORPORATION; James Lawson, Manager; Kelly Feltner, Dispatcher; Robert Peak, Human Resources, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-1558

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 19, 2017

Decided: December 21, 2017

Jeffrey Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Jason V. Federmack, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Allen appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Allen v. Ace Hardware Corp.,*No. 1:16-cv-01206-CCE-JLW (M.D.N.C. Apr. 17, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Exhibit 15.1





CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-203970) pertaining to the 2004 Share Option Plan, 2012 Share Incentive
Plan, 2015 Incentive Compensation Plan and 2015 Employee Share Purchase Plan of Kornit Digital Ltd. of our report dated March 17,
2016 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Kornit Digital Ltd. and its subsidiaries included in its annual report
(Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2015.





|Tel Aviv, IsraelMarch 17, 2016 |  | /s/ KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
        KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
        A member of Ernst & Young Global
|------------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                       COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE

                                                  THREE MONTHS ENDED          SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                        JUNE 30,                  JUNE 30,
                                                  ------------------          -----------------
                                                    1996       1997             1996      1997
                                                  --------   -------          -------    ------
<S>                                               <C>        <C>              <C>        <C>

Net loss                                          $   (696)   $ (1,148)        $ (1,097)  $ (2,133)
                                                  ========    ========         ========   ========

Weighted average common stock outstanding
during the period                                    7,019       8,160            7,019      7,677

Impact of shares issued within 12 months
of the initial public offering                         680         680              680        680

Effect of stock options granted within
12 months of the initial public offering,
using the treasury stock method                        243         243              243        243

Effect of warrants granted within 12 months
of the initial public offering, using the
treasury stock method                                  256          88              256         88
                                                  ========    ========         ========   ========

Shares used in computing net loss per share          8,198       9,171            8,198      8,688
                                                  ========    ========         ========   ========

Net loss per share                                $  (0.08)   $  (0.13)        $  (0.13)  $  (0.25)
                                                  ========    ========         ========   ========
</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 32003R1242 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32003R1242

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1242/2003 of 10 July 2003 on the issue of import licences for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal **

*
Official Journal L 173 , 11/07/2003 P. 0042 - 0042 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1242/2003

of 10 July 2003

on the issue of import licences for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 936/97 of 27 May 1997 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas for high-quality fresh, chilled and frozen beef and for frozen buffalo meat(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 649/2003(2),

Whereas:

(1) Regulation (EC) No 936/97 provides in Articles 4 and 5 the conditions for applications and for the issue of import licences for meat referred to in Article 2(f).

(2) Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 fixes the amount of high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal originating in and imported from the United States of America and Canada which may be imported on special terms for the period 1 July 2003 to 30 June 2004 at 11500 t.

(3) It should be recalled that licences issued pursuant to this Regulation will, throughout the period of validity, be open for use only in so far as provisions on health protection in force permit,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1. All applications for import licences from 1 to 5 July 2003 for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal as referred to in Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 shall be granted in full.

2. Applications for licences may be submitted, in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 936/97, during the first five days of August 2003 for 1799,667 t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 July 2003.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 July 2003.

For the Commission

J. M. Silva Rodríguez

Agriculture Director-General

(1) OJ L 137, 28.5.1997, p. 10.

(2) OJ L 95, 11.4.2003, p. 13.