alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                       |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                       |  |
| Citibank, N.A.                        | Deutsche Bank Trust Company Delaware |
| As ACOLT Indenture Trustee            | As ACOLT Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Kristen Driscoll     | Attn:  Mark DiGiacomo |
| 388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor | 1011 Centre Road, Suite 200 |
| New York, NY 10013                    | Wilmington, DE 19805-1266 |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
|   | Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas |
|   | Attn:  Corporate Trust & Agency Group - |
|   | Structured Finance Services |
|   | 60 Wall Street, 26th floor |
|   | Mail Stop:  NYC60-2606 |
|   | New York, NY 10005 |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| Re:    | ACOLT 2014-SN2 - Servicing Agreement |
|   | Annual Statement as to Compliance |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, and of its performance under the ACOLT 2014-SN2 Servicing Agreement has been under his supervision, and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the ACOLT 2014-SN2  Servicing Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
|   |   |
Exhibit 32.1




STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




The undersigned, Andrew Gordon, is the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Coffee Holding Co., Inc. (the “Company”).





This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2011 (the “Report”).


By execution of this statement, I certify that:





(A)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and





(B)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.





This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Coffee Holding Co., Inc. and will be retained by Coffee Holding Co., Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







Date:  March 17, 2011
By:
/s/ Andrew GordonAndrew GordonPresident, Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive and

Accounting Officer)
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

The undersigned executive officer of First Federal Bancshares ofArkansas, Inc. (the “Registrant”) hereby certifies that the Registrant’s Form 10-Qfor the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrant.

 

 
|   |                | By:    |   /s/ Larry J. Brandt     |
|--------|---------------------|--------|--------------------------------|
|   |                |   |   Larry J. Brandt         |
|   |                |   |   Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                |   |                           |
| Date:  | July 24,  2008 |   |                           |

 

----
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 **ANNUALSTATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreementdated as of September 1, 2014, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGESECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asGeneral Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as General SpecialServicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Master Servicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Special Servicer,PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and asCustodian, and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respectto Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C22 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton,Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.      A review of the activities of the General Master Servicer duringthe period from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018, (the “ReportingPeriod”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has beenmade under my supervision, and

 

2.      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the GeneralMaster Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in allmaterial respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
<PAGE>

[JONES WALKER LOGO]
                                                                       EXHIBIT 5


                                  June 12, 2002



Conrad Industries, Inc.
1501 Front Street
Morgan City, Louisiana 70381

Gentlemen:

     We have acted as counsel for Conrad Industries, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), in connection with the preparation of a
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (the "Registration Statement") to be filed by
the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, relating to the offering by the Company of 400,000 shares
of common stock, $.01 par value per share, and accompanying preferred stock
purchase rights, pursuant to the terms of the Conrad Industries, Inc. 2002 Stock
Plan (the "Plan").

     Based upon the foregoing and upon our examination of such matters as we
deem necessary to furnish this opinion, we are of the opinion that the shares
covered by the Registration Statement have been duly authorized and, when issued
for at least par value upon the terms described in the Plan and the Registration
Statement, will be validly issued and outstanding, fully paid and nonassessable.

     We consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration
Statement.

                                  Very truly yours,

                                  /s/ JONES, WALKER, WAECHTER,
                                          POITEVENT, CARRERE & DENEGRE, L.L.P.
2013.12.31 - 10K  EX 10.26








December 16, 2013






David Schmoll


Re:    Renewal of Amended and Restated Retention Agreement
Dear David:
This letter is to serve as your notification that Ply Gem Industries, Inc. has elected to execute its Renewal Term right under your current Amended and Restated Retention Agreement dated December 31, 2008 for a period of one year.  As such, all applicable rights and terms as outlined in your Amended and Restated Retention Agreement will remain in effect through December 31, 2014.
Please sign this letter in the space provided below as your acknowledgment and agreement of this Renewal Term agreement and return this original to me, and retain a copy for your own records.
	
		
	 
	Sincerely,

	 
	 

	 
	PLY GEM INDUSTRIES, INC.

	 
	 

	 
	By:  /s/ Gary E. Robinette

	 
	Name:  Gary E. Robinette

	 
	Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	Acknowledged and Agreed:
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	/s/ David Schmoll
	 

	David Schmoll
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Emerald Dairy Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended
September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Shu Kaneko, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:  November
15, 2010





By:
                            
                            /s/
      Shu KanekoName:
                            Shu
      KanekoTitle:
                            Chief
      Financial Officer and Secretary(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 21.1

                                Subsidiaries of
                           OYO Geospace Corporation

OYO Geospace International, Inc., a Barbados corporation
OYOG, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
OYOG Limited Partner, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company
OYOG Operations, LP, a Texas limited partnership
Geo Space, LP, a Texas limited partnership
OYO Geo Space Canada, Inc., an Alberta corporation
OYO Instruments LP, a Texas limited partnership
OYO Instruments Europe Limited, a United Kingdom company
Geospace Engineering Resources International, LP, a Texas limited partnership
Geospace Engineering Resources EAME Limited, a United Kingdom company
Concord Technologies, LP, a Texas limited partnership
OYO Geospace J.V., LP, a Texas limited partnership
OYO-GEO Impulse International, LLC, a Russian limited liability company
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The   undersigned,   who  is  the  Chief  Financial   Officer  of  International
Microcomputer  Software,  Inc. (the  "Company"),  hereby  certifies that (i) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004,
as filed by the  Company  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the
"Quarterly Report"),  to which this Certification is an Exhibit,  fully complies
with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act;
and (ii) the information  contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



DATE: MAY 13, 2004

/S/ WILLIAM J. BUSH
William J. Bush
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by section 906 has been
provided to International  Microcomputer  Software, Inc. and will be retained by
International  Microcomputer  Software, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Eddie PALMER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-7541

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 30, 2018

Decided: February 2, 2018

*182James Eddie Palmer, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Curtis Bosse, Stephen Westley Haynie, Darryl James Mitchell, Randy Carl Stoker, Assistant United States Attorneys, V. Kathleen Dougherty, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Eddie Palmer seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will hot issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Palmer has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Document








Exhibit 10.1
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation


	
								
	Annual Cash Retainer Fee 
 
	 
	$
	68,000
	 
	 

	Lead Director Additional Annual Cash Retainer
	 
	$
	20,000
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Annual Equity Retainer (in common stock equivalent)†
	 
	 
	

	$105,000
	

	 

	

Annual Retainer - Committee Member:
	 
	 
	 

	Audit
	 
	$
	12,000
	 
	 

	Leadership Development and Compensation Committee
	 
	$
	6,000
	 
	 

	Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee
	 
	$
	6,000
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	Additional Annual Retainer for Committee Chairs:
	 
	 
	 

	Audit
	 
	$
	15,000
	 
	 

	Executive
	 
	$
	15,000
	 
	 

	Leadership Development and Compensation
	 
	$
	15,000
	 
	 

	Nominating/Corporate Governance
	 
	$
	15,000
	 
	 




Subsidiary Board Retainers:*
Annual Retainer- Subsidiary Board Member**                               $9,000
Additional Annual Retainer- Subsidiary Board Lead Director***                     $15,000
In the event of extraordinary circumstances resulting in an excessive number of Board or Committee meetings beyond the typical number of meetings of a Board or Committee in a given year, the Board retains discretion to pay an additional per meeting fee of $1,500 to each attending non-employee director that is a member of such Board or Committee.
† The number of shares to be based upon the closing price of a share of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant.
* Subsidiary Boards include the Boards of Directors for New Jersey Natural Gas, NJR Energy Services, NJR Clean Energy Ventures and NJR Energy Investments.  
**Subsidiary Board Member Annual Retainers and any additional meeting fees are based upon each member only being compensated for one meeting when joint Boards of Directors meetings occur.
***Lead Directors of more than one subsidiary Board will only be paid a single annual retainer fee of $15,000 for service as Lead Director on those Boards.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed July

11 , 2019.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 19 -00510- CV

IN RE PHYLLIS MORGAN, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 239th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 95704- CV



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
On June 27, 2019, relator Phyllis Morgan filed a petition for writ of mandamus
in this c ourt. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 ( Supp. ); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this c ourt to compel the Honorable Patrick Sebesta , presiding judge of the 239th District Court of Brazoria County , to vacate his June2

21, 2019 order for relator to produce her homeowner’s insurance policy within thirty days of the order

. Relator also has filed a motion for temporary relief , asking this court to stay this order pending a decision on his petition

. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10.
To obtain mandamus relief, a relator must show that the trial court clearly
abused its discretion . In re Prudential Ins. Co ., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135– 36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding); In re Garza , 544 S.W.3d 836, 840 (Tex. 2018) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam). Relator has not shown that the trial court clearly abused its discretion

. We the refore deny relator ’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for stay

.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Hassan.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 238 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con. Res.238
                                        Agreed to March 18, 1998        

                       One Hundred Fifth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  eight

                          Concurrent Resolution

 

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF BREAST CANCER SURVIVORS EVENT ON CAPITOL 
              GROUNDS.

    The National Race for the Cure (referred to in this resolution as 
the ``Race'') may sponsor a public event on the Capitol Grounds on 
April 1, 1998, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate may jointly 
designate.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--The event to be carried out under this resolution 
shall be--
        (1) free of admission charge to the public; and
        (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress and 
    under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol 
    and the Capitol Police Board.
    (b) Responsibility.--The Race shall assume full responsibility for 
all expenses and liabilities incident to all activities associated with 
the event.

SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

    For the purposes of this resolution, the Race may erect upon the 
Capitol Grounds, subject to the approval of the Architect of the 
Capitol, such stage, sound amplification devices, commemorative pink 
ribbon and other related structures and equipment as may be required 
for the event to be carried out under this resolution.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

    The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board may make 
any such additional arrangements that may be required to carry out the 
event under this resolution.

SEC. 5. APPLICABILITY OF PROHIBITIONS.

    Nothing in this resolution may be construed to waive the 
applicability of the prohibitions established by section 4 of the Act 
of July 31, 1946 (chapter 707; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, 
displays and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 317 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 317

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Expressing the sense of the Congress that Members of Congress should 
    follow the examples of self-sacrifice and devotion to character 
   displayed by Jacob Chestnut and John Gibson of the United States 
                            Capitol Police.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 317

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas Jacob Chestnut and John Gibson of the United States Capitol Police laid 
        down their lives for their country and all of us;
Whereas beyond the devotion of Jacob Chestnut and John Gibson to duty, honor, 
        and country was their commitment to respect;
Whereas Jacob Chestnut and John Gibson were simple, humble, private men who 
        deeply moved this nation simply by doing their jobs;
Whereas the focus on their exemplary personal character could not have come at a 
        time of greater need as many in our country seem more and more dedicated 
        to self-indulgence; and
Whereas the Members of Congress have an unparalleled opportunity to be urgently 
        needed role models of respect and dignity with no loss of personal 
        principles: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Members of Congress should follow the example of Jacob Chestnut 
and John Gibson by living lives of love, respect, and integrity every 
day at all times, including on the floor of the Senate and House of 
Representatives, and should deserve the title ``Honorable'' by setting 
an example so that Jacob Chestnut and John Gibson did not die in vain.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 1998.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v.
IKEMEFULA CHARLES IBEABUCHI , Petitioner

.

No. 1 CA

- CR 1 8

- 0 841 PRPC

Appeal fro m the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR1999

- 095310 The Honorable John R. Doody , Judge Pro Tempore
REVIEW GRANTED AND RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL Maricopa County Attorney’s Office , Phoenix By Andrea L. Kever Counsel for Respondent

Ikemefula Charles Ibeabuchi , Florence Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Randall M. Howe, Judge Jennifer M. Perkins , and Judge David D. Weinzweig delivered the decision of the Court. FILED 6-18-2019STATE v. IBEABUCHI Decision of the Court

2 PER CURIAM : ¶1 Petitioner Ikemefula Charles Ibeabuchi seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner’s first petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for po st

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577 ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, 538 ¶ 1 (A pp. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find that petitioner h as not established an abuse of discretion. ¶4 For the foregoing reasons, we grant review and deny relief.