alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM EXCITE,
INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          13,308
<SECURITIES>                                    28,953
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,535
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,795
<PP&E>                                          15,623
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,411)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,493
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,416
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     17,441
<COMMON>                                        97,695
<OTHER-SE>                                    (67,280)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,856
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,010
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,719
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,965
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 344
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,674)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,674)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,674)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.35)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Long Island Physician Holdings
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Paul Kolker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Paul Kolker
--------------------------------
Paul Kolker,
President, Chairman of the Board
(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: _______________________

      This certification accompanies the above-described Report on Form 10-Q
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except
to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


                                       24
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40937 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. ADOLPHO GARCIA-BADILLO, also known as Guillermo Quintero-Valli Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:07-CR-222-1 Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Adolpho GarciaBadillo has moved for leave to withdrawand has filed a briefin accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Garcia-Badillo has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D August 20, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
EXHIBIT 11
                                                                     ----------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                               TALK VISUAL CORPORATION

COMPUTATION OF BASIC WEIGHTED AVERAGE
COMMON STOCK SHARES OUTSTANDING

                                               Total       Three Months      Six Months
                                               Number           Ended           Ended
                                              Of Shares    June 30, 2003    June 30, 2003
                                            -----------    -------------    -------------

<S>                                         <C>             <C>              <C>
Outstanding shares as of January 1, 2003    148,725,141     148,725,141      148,725,141

Issuance of common shares on 6/30/03          4,000,000          44,400           22,200

                                            -----------     -----------      -----------

Total Weighted Average Shares Outstanding   152,725,141     148,769,541      148,747,341
                                            ===========     ===========      ===========


Net Income                                                  $   810,206      $   210,887
                                                            ===========      ===========
Net Income per common share                                 $    0.0054      $    0.0014

</TABLE>


                                    Page 18
<PAGE>

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K
                                 CURRENT REPORT

                       Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
                       the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

        DATE OF REPORT (DATE OF EARLIEST EVENT REPORTED): APRIL 29, 2002

                              DYNEGY HOLDINGS INC.
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

          Delaware                   0-29311                 94-3248415
(State or other jurisdiction  (Commission File Number)     (IRS Employer
     of incorporation)                                   Identification No.)

                           1000 Louisiana, Suite 5800
                              Houston, Texas 77002
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

       Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (713) 507-6400

                                 Not Applicable
          (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
<PAGE>

ITEM 5. OTHER EVENTS.

     Dynegy Holdings Inc. ("Dynegy Holdings") has recently become aware of the
public announcement of several class action lawsuits that have been commenced on
behalf of purchasers of publicly traded securities of Dynegy Inc., Dynegy
Holdings' wholly owning parent company ("Dynegy"), generally during the period
between April 2001 and April 2002. Dynegy has not been served with complaints
relating to these actions. However, based on press reports relating to these
complaints, Dynegy Holdings understands that they principally assert that Dynegy
and certain of its officers and directors violated the federal securities laws
in connection with Dynegy's accounting treatment and disclosure of the natural
gas supply transaction that was entered into by Dynegy in April 2001 and the
subject of Dynegy's and Dynegy Holdings' Current Reports on Form 8-K filed on
April 25, 2002. Dynegy Holdings anticipates that additional suits of this nature
may be commenced and that all such suits will eventually be consolidated in a
single court. Dynegy Holdings will fully analyze these allegations once the
complaints are received and, based on its current understanding, believes these
allegations are without merit and expects Dynegy to vigorously defend against
them.

ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS

c) Exhibits. The following exhibits are filed with this document: None.
<PAGE>

                                    SIGNATURE

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                    DYNEGY HOLDINGS INC.

                        BY:     /s/ Keith R. Fullenweider
                                ---------------------------------------------
                                Keith R. Fullenweider
                                Senior Vice President, Deputy General Counsel
                                and Secretary

Dated: April 29, 2002
#### IN RE: Daniel Arthur HELEVA, Petitioner

No. 17-3491

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. November 30, 2017

(Opinion filed: February 16, 2018)

Daniel Arthur Heleva, Pro Se

E. David Christine, Jr., Esq., Mark S. Matthews, Esq., Monroe County Office of District Attorney, Stroudsburg, PA, for Respondent

Before: SMITH, Chief Judge, CHAGARES and HARDIMAN, Circuit Judges

OPINION *

PER CURIAM

Daniel Heleva, proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania to expedite his habeas proceedings. On January 9, 2018, the District Court denied Heleva’s amended habeas petition. To the extent Heleva has obtained the relief he sought, his mandamus petition is moot. Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d Cir. 1996).

' To the extent Heleva seeks release from prison based on the merits of the claim he raised in his amended habeas petition, mandamus relief is not available because Heleva had other adequate means to obtain the desired relief via his amended habeas petition and he can pursue his claim on appeal. See In re Patenaude, 210 F.3d 135, 141 (2000). Similarly, to the extent Heleva seeks mandamus relief in connection with motions he filed in District Court that were not addressed in the District Court’s decision denying habeas relief, Heleva moved the District Court to review these motions and filed a notice of appeal and thus has other adequate means to obtain relief.

*117Accordingly, we will deny the petition for a writ of mandamus.1

*

This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.

1

. Heleva’s motion to strike Respondent’s response filed November 27, 2017, which may be construed as a response to the mandamus petition, is denied. To the extent the response may be construed as requesting reconsideration of the Clerk’s Order granting Heleva in forma pauperis status, the request is denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Grant C. Bennett, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant`s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant`s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)	Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant`s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant`s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably like to materially affect, the registrant`s internal control over financial reporting.

1. The registrant`s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant`s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant`s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant`s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant`s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	August 8,  2007
/s/	Grant C. Bennett
Grant C. Bennett
President and Treasurer
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 242 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 242

Expressing the sense of the Congress favoring the authorization, in the 
manner provided by law, of the establishment of a commemorative work in 
the District of Columbia to honor the veterans of the Persian Gulf War.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 12, 1998

 Mr. McGovern submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                 referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Congress favoring the authorization, in the 
manner provided by law, of the establishment of a commemorative work in 
the District of Columbia to honor the veterans of the Persian Gulf War.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that a commemorative work to honor 
the veterans of the Persian Gulf War should, subject to the procedures 
and requirements of the Commemorative Works Act (40 U.S.C. 1001 et 
seq.), be authorized to be established on Federal lands in the District 
of Columbia and its environs. For the purposes of this resolution, the 
term ``veterans of the Persian Gulf War'' means those individuals who 
while on active duty as members of the Armed Forces participated in the 
Persian Gulf War.
                                 <all>
```
FILED

March 17, 1998

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

WILLIAM D. FARRAH, )

) C.C.A. NO. 01C01-9712-CC-00573

Appellant, )

) BEDFORD COUNTY

VS. ) (No. 14081 Below)

) The Hon. William Charles Lee

STATE OF TENNESSEE, )

) (Denial of Motion to Reduce Sentence)

Appellee. ) AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 20

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court upon the state’s motion requesting that the

judgment in the above-styled cause be affirmed pursuant to Rule 20, Tennessee Court of

Criminal Appeals Rules. Based on our review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court

pursuant to Rule 20.

On March 17, 1997, the appellant pled guilty to burglary and theft. That same

date, the appellant was sentenced to concurrent sentences of two years, one month, and

one year, six months, respectively. On August 7, 1997, the appellant filed a Motion for the

Reduction and/or Modification of Illegal Sentence Pursuant to Tenn. R. Crim. P. Rule

35(B). The motion indicates that it was submitted on July 30, 1997, and it was sent

certified mail on August 5, 1997.

The trial court denied the motion on September 10, 1997, as untimely.

Subsequently, the appellant filed a motion to reconsider on September 29, 1997. This

motion was also denied by the trial court, who further ordered that “if the defendant’s

motion had been timely filed the court would have denied the defendant[’s] motion without

an evidentiary hearing since there has been no changes of circumstance since said

judgment.”

Rule 35 of the Tennessee Rules of Criminal Procedure allows a trial court to

reduce a sentence for a defendant sentenced to the Tennessee Department of Correction,

but a motion to the court to reduce the sentence under Rule 35 must be filed within 120

days after the date the sentence is imposed. The Rule specifically provides that "[no]

extension shall be allowed on the time limitation.” and “[n]o other actions shall toll the

running of this time limitation.” 
-2-

The appellant was sentenced on March 17, 1997, therefore, a motion to

correct or reduce the sentence had to be filed by July 15, 1997. Thus, even if the Court

accepts that the appellant delivered his motion to the appropriate individual at the

correctional facility on July 30, 1997, see T.R.A.P. 20(a), the appellant's motion was not

timely. Accordingly, we find that the trial court held correctly that the motion under Rule

35 was not timely, and it is unnecessary for this Court to address the appellant’s other

issues. 

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the state’s motion to affirm the

judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 20, Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals Rules

is granted and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. The appellant being indigent,

costs are taxed to the state.

ENTER, this the ____ day of March, 1998.

_____________________________

THOMAS T. WOODALL, JUDGE

CONCUR:

_____________________________

DAVID H. WELLES, JUDGE

_____________________________

JERRY L. SMITH, JUDGE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Digestive Diseases Research Core Centers (P30).                    

*Date:*                         July 14-15, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, NIDDK, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jian Yang, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Room 7011, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 594-7799                         *yangj@extra.niddk.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 22, 2022.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-06376 Filed 3-25-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P