alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 21, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-20632 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus TALMADGE JENNINGS WHEAT, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-310-ALL

-------------------- Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Talmadge Jennings Wheat appeals his guilty-plea conviction of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). After Wheat was sentenced in this case, he was sentenced in a state court on state charges. The district court did not impose Wheat’s federal sentence to run concurrently with his subsequent state sentence. Wheat argues that his guilty plea was not knowing and voluntary because it wasNo. 03-20632 -2- induced by his counsel’s belief that his state and federal sentences would run concurrently. Wheat has failed to show that the district court, the federal prosecutor, or his federal court trial counsel induced him to plead guilty by representing to him that his federal sentence would run concurrently with any state sentence he might later receive. The validity and timing of Wheat’s federal sentence are not affected by the failure of his state counsel, the state prosecutor, or the state court to impose or execute his state sentence properly. See Opela v. United States , 415 F.2d 231, 232 (5th Cir. 1969). Thus, Wheat has not shown that his plea was not knowing and voluntary, and the district court did not plainly err in failing to impose his federal sentence concurrently with his anticipated state sentence. See United
States v. Brown , 328 F.3d 787, 789 (5th Cir. 2003).
AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.7

[LETTER HEAD OF RYDER SCOTT COMPANY]

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

        As independent oil and gas consultants, Ryder Scott Company, L.P.,
hereby consents to the use of our reserve reports dated as of December 31, 2000,
and December 31, 2001 and to all references to our firm included in or made a
part of the Mission Resources Corporation's Form 10-K to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about March 25, 2003, and to the
incorporation by reference thereof into Mission Resources Corporation's
previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-63562,
333-54798, 333-57827, 333-27707 and 33-91326).


                                             /s/ Ryder Scott Company, L.P.

                                             RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.

Houston, Texas
April 4, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statement of operations, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1999
<CASH>                                         87,533
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,868,292
<ALLOWANCES>                                   100,260
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,939,335
<PP&E>                                         542,345
<DEPRECIATION>                                 114,580
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 16,568,679
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          13,274,737
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       14,794
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,155,763
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   16,568,679
<SALES>                                        5,589,447
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,589,447
<CGS>                                          3,672,851
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,442,513
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             184,045
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (709,962)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (159,200)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (550,762)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (550,762)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.03)
        



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

**Section 906 Certificate**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Adrian Rawcliffe, Chief Financial Officer of Adaptimmune Therapeutics plc, a public limited company incorporated under English law (the “Company”), hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

 

1.                                      The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended June 30, 2015 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                      The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: October 13, 2015

 
|   | /s/   Adrian Rawcliffe      |
|--------|-----------------------------|
|   | Adrian Rawcliffe            |
|   | *Chief   Financial Officer* |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 62 (Thursday, March 31, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18796-18797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06936]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. and its 
continuation at the conclusion of the open meeting on April 7, 2022.

PLACE: 1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC and virtual (this meeting 
will be a hybrid meeting).

[[Page 18797]]


STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

Matters To Be Considered: 
    Compliance matters pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 30109.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
* * * * *

Contact Person for More Information: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.
    Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b.

Vicktoria J. Allen,
Acting Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-06936 Filed 3-29-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

The undersigned executive officer of FirstFederal Bancshares of Arkansas, Inc. (the “Registrant”) hereby certifiesthat the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31,2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained thereinfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.

 

 
|                    | By:    | /s/ Larry J. Brandt     |
|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                    |   | Larry J. Brandt         |
|                    |   | Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |   |                    |
| Date: May 14, 2009 |   |                    |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE YORK GROUP, INC. 2000 SECOND QUARTER REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>             6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          121
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                35,647
<ALLOWANCES>                                  3,987
<INVENTORY>                                  28,154
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             66,247
<PP&E>                                       93,986
<DEPRECIATION>                               38,082
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              200,327
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        57,972
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                         89
<OTHER-SE>                                   92,687
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 92,776
<SALES>                                     102,712
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            102,712
<CGS>                                        72,244
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                72,244
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            3,489
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               3,627
<INCOME-TAX>                                  1,823
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           1,804
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                  1,804
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.20


</TABLE>
## NUMBER 13

- 2 1

- 00 183

- CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

JASON REIP , A ppellant ,

v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, A ppellee

.

On a ppeal from the 3 6 th District Court of Aransas County, Texas.



## ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria , and Tijerina Order Per Curiam

Appellant’s brief was due on A ugust 1 6, 2021 . Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 38.8(b)(2), on August 19 , 2021 and August 31, 2021 , the Clerk of the Court

notified appellant’s counsel that the brief had not been timely filed, requested counsel to

file a response concerning the failure to file the brief within ten days, and warned counsel2 that the Court would abate and remand this cause to the trial court for appropriate findings

if a response was not filed. Counsel has nevertheless failed to file either a response or

an appellate brief in this matter.

Accordingly, we now ABATE this appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court

for further proceedings pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure. Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means n ecessary to make

appropriate findings and recommendations concerning the following: (1) whether

appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; (2) why appellant's counsel has failed to file a

brief and whether counsel has effectively abandoned the appeal; (3) whether appellant

has been denied effective assistance of counsel; (4) whether appellant's counsel should

be removed; and (5) whether appellant is indigent and entitled to court appointed

counsel.

If the trial court determines that appellant does want to continue the appeal, that

present counsel should be removed, and that appellant is indigent and entitled to court

appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint new counsel to represent appellant in this

appeal. If new counsel is appointed, the name, ad dress, email address, telephone

number, email address, and state bar number of said counsel shall be included in an

order appointing counsel.

The trial court shall cause its findings and recommendations, together with any

orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, in a supplemental clerk's

record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter's record of any

proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk's record and supplemental3 reporter's record, if any, shall be file d with the Clerk of this Court on or before the

expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.

P ER CU RIAM

Do not publish. T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on this 21st day of September , 2021.
#### COM. v. MORGAN, A.

83 WDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/07/2017

Reargument Denied 10/20/2017

CP-02-CR-0010913-2011 (Allegheny)

Affirmed
#### COM. v. CLARK, H.

3507 EDA 2015

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/01/2017

CP-51-CR-0011008-2013

(Philadelphia)

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                         117,427    
<SECURITIES>                                   0          
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,284,395  
<ALLOWANCES>                                   250,000    
<INVENTORY>                                    177,193    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,929,020  
<PP&E>                                         4,465,008  
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,342,948  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8,967,889  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,597,615  
<BONDS>                                        1,342,446  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          1,300,000  
<PREFERRED>                                    0          
<COMMON>                                       1,007      
<OTHER-SE>                                     726,821    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8,967,889  
<SALES>                                        3,295,363  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,295,363  
<CGS>                                          3,039,914  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,284,137  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0          
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               76,997     
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             308,237    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,374,008)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0          
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,374,008)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0          
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0          
<CHANGES>                                      0          
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,374,008)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .14        
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .14        
                                               


</TABLE>
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 167 Received in Senate (RDS)]







105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 167


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 6, 1997

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION


 
      To correct a technical error in the enrollment of H.R. 2160

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of H.R. 2160 the Clerk of the House shall, in 
title IV, in the item relating to ``DOMESTIC FOOD PROGRAMS--food stamp 
program'', strike the period and insert the following: ``: Provided 
further, That none of the funds made available under this heading shall 
be used for studies and evaluations.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 6, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.

                              By Julie Perrier,

                                                Assistant to the Clerk.`
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 62 (Thursday, March 31, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 18852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06745]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 11694]


Determination Under Section 506(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance 
Act of 1961 To Provide Military Assistance to Ukraine

    Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 506(a)(1) of the 
Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (the ``Act'') (22 U.S.C. 2318(a)(1)), 
and Presidential Delegation of Authority dated March 16, 2022, I hereby 
determine that an unforeseen emergency exists which requires immediate 
military assistance to Ukraine. I further determine that the emergency 
requirement cannot be met under the authority of the Arms Export 
Control Act or any other provision of law.
    I, therefore, pursuant to authority delegated to me by the 
President, direct the drawdown of up to $800 million in defense 
articles and services of the Department of Defense, and military 
education and training, under the authority of section 506(a)(1) of the 
Act to provide assistance to Ukraine. The Department of State will 
coordinate implementation of this drawdown.
    This determination shall be reported to the Congress and published 
in the Federal Register.

    Dated: March 16, 2022.
Antony J. Blinken,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2022-06745 Filed 3-30-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Jennifer M. Davis, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect
of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2014-5 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance
statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association.



By:

/s/ Jennifer M. DavisName:

Jennifer M. DavisTitle:

Deputy Chief Financial OfficerDate:

August 19, 2016
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-2466

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Derrick Maurice Scott lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota

____________ Submitted: December 28, 2023 Filed: January 29, 2024 [Unpublished]

____________ Before COLLOTON, BENTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Derrick Maurice Scott appeals after a jury found him guilty of four drug and firearm offenses. The district court 1 imposed the statutory-minimum prison sentence

1 The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.on Count 2, and varied downward from the Guidelines and imposed sentences of time

served on Counts 1, 3, and 4. Scott’s counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). In the Anders brief, counsel challenges the sentences imposed on Counts 1, 3, and 4, arguing that the district court abused its discretion by not imposing an even lower sentence or clearly erred by improperly weighing the sentencing factors. Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose a substantively unreasonable sentence. The record shows that the court considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and did not err in weighing the relevant factors. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (explaining that a sentencing court abuses its discretion when it fails to consider a relevant factor, gives significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or commits a clear error of judgment in weighing the appropriate factors). We have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and find no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court and grant counsel leave to withdraw.

______________________________

-2-