alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marc Alan JANNEY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 74-1762.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 15, 1975.

*898Ramon (Ray) Ramos, Jr., El Paso, Tex., for defendant-appellant.

William S. Sessions, U. S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., Ron Ederer, Asst. U. S. Atty., El Paso, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before TUTTLE, RONEY and GEE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The single issue on this appeal is the constitutionality of the 8 U.S.C.A. § 1357 search of a vehicle conducted by border agents at the permanent border checkpoint at Sierra Blanca, Texas. On the basis of our decision today in United States v. Hart, 506 F.2d 887 (5th Cir. 1975), we hold this search to be constitutional. We affirm the conviction of Marc Alan Janney of one count of possession with intent to distribute approximately 97 pounds of marijuana, a Schedule I Controlled Substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(a)(1).

On December 27, 1973, at approximately 7:30 p.m., Marc Alan Janney drove into the permanent border checkpoint which is located four miles west of Sierra Blanca, Texas, on Interstate Highway 10. When Border Patrol Agent Alfonso Saenz leaned over to ask Janney his citizenship, Saenz detected a strong odor of marijuana coming from inside Janney’s car. Saenz asked Janney to open the trunk of his car but Janney replied that he did not have the key. At this point, Border Patrol Agent Candy Gutierrez joined Saenz. Gutierrez instructed Janney to pull his car to the right hand side of the checkpoint area and to open his trunk, either by using a key or by removing the back seat. Janney removed the back seat of his vehicle and the border patrol agents seized approximately 97 pounds of marijuana.

In United States v. Hart, *supra,*we held that the decision of the Supreme Court in Almeida-Sanchez v. United States, 413 U.S. 266, 93 S.Ct. 2535, 37 L.Ed.2d 596 (1973), did not alter the precedential effect of prior opinions of this Circuit upholding the validity of searches conducted pursuant to 8 U.S.C.A. § 1357 at the Sierra Blanca checkpoint. In *Hart,*border patrol agents at the Sierra Blanca checkpoint stopped defendant’s vehicle, requested that defendant give his citizenship, and, as a routine matter, asked defendant to open his trunk so that the agents could search for aliens illegally in the United States. When the trunk was opened, the agents detected an odor of marijuana and discovered a quantity of the substance. We upheld the search in *Hart*as constitutional on the authority of United States v. McGlynn, 496 F.2d 1316 (5th Cir. 1974); United States v. Hufstetler, 496 F.2d 1184 (5th Cir. 1974); United States v. Merla, 493 F.2d 910 (5th Cir. 1974), and other decisions of this Court.

There is no substantial difference beeen the stop and search of Janney’s vehicle and that approved in *Hart.*

Affirmed.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Mary Kaparic, Plaintiff-Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>309 East 5 Street LLC, Fame Partners, LLC and R.A. Cohen &amp; Associates, Defendants-Appellants.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendants appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Paul A. Goetz, J.), entered August 12, 2015, which denied their motion to preclude, or in the alternative, to compel compliance with certain discovery demands.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Order (Paul A. Goetz, J.), entered August 12, 2015, reversed, without costs, and defendants' motion is granted to the extent of precluding plaintiff from offering evidence of her injuries unless she fully complies with the October 29, 2010 order of Judge Engoron within 60 days after service of a copy of this order with notice of entry.</p><p>While we appreciate and understand Civil Court's frustration with the pace of this now 13-year old trip and fall action, the court should not have forced defendants to trial without an opportunity to complete discovery (<i>see Lipson v Dime Sav. Bank of NY</i>, 203 AD2d 161, 162-163 [1994]; <i>M &amp; J Trimming v Kew Mgt. Corp</i>., 254 AD2d 21 [1998]). The record shows that if anyone, it was plaintiff, not defendants, who engaged in dilatory conduct by failing to comply with numerous prior discovery orders issued by judges of coordinate jurisdiction. Moreover, the outstanding discovery relates to conditions that plaintiff placed "in controversy" through her deposition testimony and bill of particulars (<i>see Pirone v Castro</i>, 82 AD3d 431 [2011]). We deem it appropriate to grant plaintiff a final opportunity to comply by granting defendants' motion to preclude conditionally (<i>see Cela v Goodyear Tire &amp; Rubber Co.</i>, 286 AD2d 640 [2001]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur <br>Decision Date: May 25, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
(logo)**Prudential**

**PrudentialAsset Resources**

PGIMReal Estate Finance

2100Ross Avenue, Suite 2500, Dallas TX 75201

Tel214-777-4500

 

Abusiness of Prudential Financial, Inc.

 

WellsFargo Bank, National Association

CommercialMortgage Servicing

MACD1086

550South Tryon Street, 14th Floor

Charlotte,North Carolina 28202

Attention:Asset Manager

 

 

RE:         **WFCM 2014-LC18**

Period: **January 1, 2018 to December 31,2018(the "Reporting Period")**

 

 

**Annual ComplianceStatement**

 

I, Joni Brown-Haas, in my capacity asPresident and Managing Director of Prudential Asset Resources, Inc. (the"Company") hereby certify with regard to the Company's role asSub-Servicer under the Sub-Servicing Agreement, (the "Agreement")dated as of December 1, 2014, pertaining to the above-referenced certificates,that:

 

       (i)         a review of theactivities of the Company under the Agreement  during the period notedabove, and  of the performance of the Company under the Agreement duringthe  relevant  period  has been made under my supervision, and

 

     (ii)        to thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled all itsobligations under the Agreement throughout the relevant period, and

 

   (iii)         tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled itsobligations under its sub-servicing agreement in all material respects, and

 

    (iv)        theCompany has maintained an effective internal control system over the servicing ofmortgage loans including the Loans serviced by the Company, and

 

     (v)        theCompany has not received any notice regarding qualification or challenging thestatus of the Lower Tier REMIC or the Upper Tier REMIC as a REMIC, from the IRSor any other governmental agency or body.

 

Effectiveas of February 22, 2019

 

 

/s/Joni Brown-Haas

JoniBrown-Haas

Presidentand Managing Director

PrudentialAsset Resources, Inc.
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Ashley C.
Andersen, President and Chief Executive Officer of Trudy Corporation do hereby
certify, to the best of my knowledge that:

     1)  The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
         September 30, 2007 being filed with the Securities and Exchange
         Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
         amended; and

     2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


This Certification accompanies this Form 10-QSB as an exhibit, but shall not be
deemed as having been filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or as a separate disclosure document of the Company or the
certifying officer.


                                       TRUDY CORPORATION
                                       (REGISTRANT)

Date: November 19, 2007                By: /s/ Ashley C. Andersen
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Ashley C. Andersen,
                                           President, Chief Executive Officer



                                  Page 33 of 34
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 106

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the

fiscal year 1998, and for other purposes.
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 106

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

1998, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 106(3) of Public Law 105–46 is further

4 amended by striking ‘‘November 14, 1997’’ and inserting
2

•HJ 106 EH

1 in lieu thereof ‘‘November 26, 1997’’, and each provision

2 amended by sections 122 and 123 of such public law shall

3 be applied as if ‘‘November 26, 1997’’ was substituted for

4 ‘‘October 23, 1997’’.

Passed the House of Representatives November 13,

1997.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 2 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 2

  Expressing the sense of the Congress that the People's Republic of 
China should purchase a majority of its imported wheat from the United 
  States in order to reduce the trade imbalance between the People's 
                Republic of China and the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 19 (legislative day, January 10), 1995

  Mr. Dorgan submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Congress that the People's Republic of 
China should purchase a majority of its imported wheat from the United 
  States in order to reduce the trade imbalance between the People's 
                Republic of China and the United States.

Whereas the trade surplus of the People's Republic of China with the United 
        States has exploded in recent years, increasing from $3,500,000,000 in 
        1988 to about $30,000,000,000 in 1994;
Whereas the United States share of the People's Republic of China's wheat 
        imports has decreased from 52 percent in 1988 to between 30 and 40 
        percent in the past 5 years;
Whereas the Government of the People's Republic of China has chosen to increase 
        its purchases of wheat from other exporting nations despite the 
        incentives the United States offers to the People's Republic of China to 
        make United States wheat competitive in the world market; and
Whereas the People's Republic of China's reduction in purchases of United States 
        wheat during a period of rapid growth in the People's Republic of 
        China's trade surplus with the United States aggravates the serious 
        trade imbalance between the 2 nations: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that the President, acting under 
his authority in trade matters, should insist that the Government of 
the People's Republic of China purchase a majority of the wheat it 
imports from the United States as an indication that the People's 
Republic of China is concerned about the trade imbalance between the 2 
nations and wants to restore a healthy, reciprocal trading partnership.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<CIK> 0000815555
<NAME> NATIONAL INSURANCE GROUP
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                             14594
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                        2211
<MORTGAGE>                                          36
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                   31575
<CASH>                                             914
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                  11
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                            2080
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   48088
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                   2800
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                               4523
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                   2000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         18287
<OTHER-SE>                                        9798
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     48088
<PREMIUMS>                                        9888
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                               1490
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   19292
<BENEFITS>                                        3647
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                       4781
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             21987
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    255
<INCOME-TAX>                                        93
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                162
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       162
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                    3055
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                               3659
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                 (12)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                1740
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                  2161
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                   2801
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                           (12)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 34.2**

 

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors

Citibank, N.A.:

 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Assertion of Compliance, that the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for publicly-issued (*i.e.*, transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) equipment loan-backed securities issued by CNH Equipment Trust 2014-C for which the Company provides trustee and paying agent services (the “Platform”), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014. With respect to the Platform, servicing criterion 1122(d)(3)(ii) is applicable only as it relates to remittances. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing the asset-backed transaction and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed the transaction and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the asset-backed transaction and securities that comprise the Platform. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 
|                   | /s/KPMG LLP |
|------------------------|-------------|
|                   |        |
| Chicago, Illinois |        |
| March 27,   2015  |        |

 

----
# U nit edSta tes C ou rt o f App eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it

No. 08-1521 CENTENNIAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, Appellant,

v . ROBERT PATTERSON, Defendant, Appellee.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on April 23, 2009, is amended as follows: On p. 6, lines 12-15: Replace sentence beginning with "At that point in time . . ." with the following: "At that point in time, Dr. Patterson had already incurred costs defending himself in the underlying Murphy action, and in connection with establishing Centennial's duty to defend in the instant suit."
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 101 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J. Res.101

                       One Hundred Fifth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-seven

                            Joint Resolution

 
 Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1998, and 
                           for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That section 106(3) of Public 
Law 105-46 is further amended by striking ``November 7, 1997'' and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``November 9, 1997'', and each provision 
amended by sections 122 and 123 of such public law shall be applied as 
if ``November 9, 1997'' was substituted for ``October 23, 1997''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Roberto CENA-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-10687 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 20, 2018

*461James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Roberto Cena-Martinez, Pro Se

Before REAVLEY, CLEMENT, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Roberto Cena-Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cena-Martinez has not filéd a response. Although Cena-Martinez remains subject to a term of supervised release, he has completed the term of imprisonment. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, *see*5th Cir. R. 42.2, and in part as moot, *see United States v. Heredia-Holguin,*823 F.3d 337, 340 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc).

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
# Official Journal C 200/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 200 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4924 August 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 200

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4924 August 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2006/C 200/1 | Special Report No 5/2006 concerning the MEDA programme, together with the Commission's replies | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Court of Auditors

2006/C 200/1

Special Report No 5/2006 concerning the MEDA programme, together with the Commission's replies

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Ashley C.
Andersen, President and Chief Executive Officer of Trudy Corporation do hereby
certify, to the best of my knowledge that:

     1)  The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June
         30, 2005 being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
         "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

This Certification accompanies this Form 10-QSB as an exhibit, but shall not be
deemed as having been filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or as a separate disclosure document of the Company or the
certifying officer.

                                       /s/ ASHLEY C. ANDERSEN
                                       ----------------------------------------
Date: August 19, 2005                  Ashley C. Andersen
                                       President, Chief Executive Officer

                                       28