Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Commerce International Trade Administration [C-351-504]
 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
 SUMMARY: As a result of this expedited sunset review, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the countervailing duty order (CVD) on heavy iron construction castings (iron castings) from Brazil would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the levels as indicated in the “Final Results of Sunset Review” section of this notice.
 DATES: Applicable April 4, 2022.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jolanta Lawska, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-8362.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On May 15, 1986, Commerce published in 
                    **Federal Register**
                     the CVD order on iron castings from Brazil.[1]
                    
                     On December 1, 2021, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the expedited fifth sunset review of the 
                    *Order,*
                     pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).[2]
                    
                     On December 16, 2021, Commerce received a notice of intent to participate from D&L Foundry, Inc., EJ USA, Inc., Neenah Foundry Company, and U.S. Foundry & Manufacturing Corporation (collectively, “domestic interested parties”), within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).[3]
                    
                     Each of these companies claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as a domestic producer of the domestic like product.[4]
                    
                     On December 30, 2021, Commerce received a substantive response and notice of intent to participate from the Government of Brazil (GBR) within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).[5] On December 31, 2021, Commerce also received a substantive response to the 
                    *Notice of Initiation*
                     from the domestic interested parties within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).[6]
                    
                     Commerce did not receive any substantive response from a producer or exporter of subject merchandise in Brazil. On January 10, 2022, the domestic interested parties filed rebuttal comments in response to the GBR's substantive response.[7]
                    
                     On January 20, 2022, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission that it did not receive a substantive response from respondent interested parties.[8]
                    
                     As a result, Commerce has conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of the 
                    *Order,*
                     pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). Scope of the Order [9] The products covered by the 
                    *Order*
                     are certain heavy iron construction castings from Brazil, limited to manhole covers, rings, and frames, catch basin grates and frames, cleanout covers and frames used for drainage or access purposes for public utility, water and sanitary systems, classifiable as heavy castings under Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) item numbers 7325.10.0010, 7325.10.0020, and 7325.10.0025. Subject merchandise may also enter under 7325.99.1000. The HTS item numbers are provided for convenience and Customs purposes only. The written description remains dispositive. Analysis of Comments Received A complete discussion of all issues raised in this sunset review, including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of subsidization in the event of revocation of the 
                    *Order*
                     and the countervailable subsidy rates likely to prevail if the 
                    *Order*
                     were to be revoked, is provided in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.[10]
                    
                     A list of the topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at 
                    *https://access.trade.gov.*
                     In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at 
                    *https://access.trade.gov/​public/​FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.* Final Results of Review Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(b) of the Act, we determine that revocation of the 
                    *Order*
                     would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy at the rate listed below: Exporter/producer
Subsidy rate
                             (percent)Country-Wide Rate
1.06 
                            *Ad Valorem*.
 Administrative Protective Order This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties Commerce is issuing and publishing these final results and this notice in 
                    ( print page 19485)
                    accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218. Dated: March 28, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
 Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. History of the Order V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues 1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy 2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rate Likely to Prevail 3. Nature of the Subsidy VII. Final Results of Review VIII. Recommendation


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         
                        *See Countervailing Duty Order; Certain Heavy Iron Construction Casting from Brazil,*51 FR 17786 (May 15, 1986) (
                        *Order*). Back to Citation
 2.
    
                         
                        *See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews,*86 FR 68220 (December 1, 2021) (
                        *Initiation Notice*). Back to Citation
 3.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Petitioners' Letter, “Five Year (“Sunset”) Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Heavy Iron Construction Castings from Brazil—Domestic Interested Parties' Notice of Intent to Participate,” dated December 16, 2021. Back to Citation
 4.
    
                         
                        *Id.*
                         at 3. Back to Citation
 5.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         GBR's Letter, “Iron Construction Castings. Sunset Review. Initial Comments,” dated December 30, 2021. Back to Citation
 6.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Petitioners' Letter, “Five Year (`Sunset') Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Heavy Iron Construction Castings from Brazil—Domestic Interested Parties' Substantive Response,” dated December 31, 2021. Back to Citation
 7.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Petitioners' Letter, “Five Year (`Sunset') Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Heavy Iron Construction Castings from Brazil—Domestic Interested Parties' Comments in Rebuttal to the Government of Brazil's Substantive Response,” dated January 10, 2022. Back to Citation
 8.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Commerce's Letter, “Sunset Reviews Initiated on December 1, 2021,” dated January 20, 2022. Back to Citation
 9.
    
                         The scope language contained in prior sunset proceedings for the 
                        *Order*
                         has varied. For clarity, Commerce intends to use the scope listed above in all future proceedings involving the 
                        *Order.* Back to Citation
 10.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum, “Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited Fifth Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Heavy Iron Construction Castings from Brazil,” dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2022-07002 Filed 4-1-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P