alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan
January 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 129601 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 129601 COA: 260327 Cheboygan CC: 80-000884-FY ROBERT WAYNE VIEAU, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 16, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

C AVANAGH and K ELLY , JJ., would remand this cas e to the Cheb oygan Circuit Court for a new trial.

d0120 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
January 27, 2006
Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         588,465
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               650,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  6,897,550
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,444,472
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,446,026
<LOANS>                                     10,361,654
<ALLOWANCE>                                   (102,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,910,657
<DEPOSITS>                                  15,439,716
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             93,290
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,395,240
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,982,411
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              21,910,657
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                324,272
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              254,401
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                51,976
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               630,649
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             188,121
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             188,229
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          442,420
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  102,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                753,972
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (387,769)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    (387,769)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (253,769)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.37)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   10.39
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,075
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              102,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           102,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

N O . 09-2323 C HARLES R. P EET , A PPELLANT ,

V . E RIC K. S HINSEKI , S ECRETARY OF V ETERANS A FFAIRS , A PPELLEE . Before HAGEL, MOORMAN, and SCHOELEN, Judges.

O R D E R On September 7, 2011, the Court ordered the parties to submit memoranda of law by October 7, 2011. On October 6, 2011, the parties filed a joint motion to stay further proceedings, indicating that they were in the final stages of negotiating a joint motion for remand but needed additional time to finalize such a motion. The following day, the parties filed a joint motion for remand. As the parties filed their joint motion for remand prior to the expiration of the Court-ordered deadline for filing their memoranda of law, there is no need to stay proceedings and the Court will therefore deny the parties' joint motion to stay further proceedings. The Court will also grant their joint motion for remand. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED that the parties' October 6, 2011, joint motion to stay further proceedings is denied. It is further ORDERED that the parties' October 7, 2011, joint motion for remand is GRANTED. DATED: October 11, 2011 PER CURIAM. Copies to: Lecia C. King-Wade, Esq. VA General Counsel (027)
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 8.1

                   LEGAL OPINION OF GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP

Mark R. Martin
Direct dial: (713) 276-5391
Direct fax: (713) 276-6391
Email: mmartin@gardere.com
       -------------------

                               November 2, 2001


Petrocon Engineering, Inc.
3155 Executive Boulevard
Beaumont, Texas 77705

     Re:  Registration Statement on Form S-4

Dear Sirs:

     As counsel for Petrocon Engineering, Inc., a Texas corporation
("Petrocon"), we have been asked to render our opinion with respect to the
Federal income tax treatment of the merger of PEI Acquisition, Inc., a Texas
corporation (the "Sub"), with and into Petrocon pursuant to the Agreement and
Plan of Merger between Industrial Data Systems Corporation, a Nevada
corporation, IDS Engineering Management, LC, a Texas limited liability company,
the Sub and Petrocon.

     We hereby confirm that the opinions described in the Registration Statement
on Form S-4 under the caption "Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of
the Merger - Tax Opinion" constitute our opinions with respect to certain
material federal income tax consequences of the merger and, subject to the
assumptions described therein and assuming that we receive the representations
letters referred to therein, we will deliver an opinion to that effect, which
opinion is a condition to the consummation of the merger of the Sub with and
into Petrocon. This opinion is not intended to be the opinion that satisfies a
condition to the consummation of the merger.

     We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement on Form S-4 and to the use of our name under the caption
"Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger--Tax Opinion" in
such Registration Statement.

                                        GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP

                                        /s/ Mark R. Martin
                                        ------------------
                                        Mark R. Martin, Partner
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT RESERVE ENGINEERS

            As Harken Energy Corporation's independent reserve engineers, Ryder
Scott Company consents to the reference in this registration statement to Ryder
Scott Company's reserve report dated December 31, 2001.

                                                             RYDER SCOTT COMPANY


Houston, Texas
September 11, 2002
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 8

Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to the significance of

maintaining the health and stability of coral reef ecosystems.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 9, 1997

Mr. SAXTON (for himself and Mr. ABERCROMBIE) submitted the following

concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to the significance of maintaining the health and stability of coral

reef ecosystems.

Whereas coral reefs are among the world’s most biologically

diverse and productive marine habitats, often described

as the tropical rain forests of the oceans;

Whereas healthy coral reefs provide the basis for subsistence,

commercial fisheries, and coastal and marine tourism and

are of vital economic importance to coastal States and

territories of the United States including Florida, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, and

American Samoa;

Whereas healthy coral reefs function as natural, regenerating

coastal barriers, protecting shorelines and coastal areas

from high waves and storm surges;
2

HCON 8 IH

Whereas the scientific community has long established that

coral reefs are subject to a wide range of natural and anthropogenic threats;

Whereas the United States has taken measures to protect national coral reef resources through the designation and

management of several underwater national parks

(known as National Marine Sanctuaries), containing reefs

of the Flower Garden Banks in the Gulf of Mexico, the

Florida Keys in south Florida, and offshore Hawaii and

American Samoa;

Whereas the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has established itself as a global leader in coral reef

stewardship by maintaining professional networks for the

purposes of sharing knowledge and information on coral

reefs, furnishing near real-time data collected at coral

reef sites, providing a repository for historical data relating to coral reefs, and making substantial contributions

to the general fund of coral reef knowledge; and

Whereas 1997 has been declared the ‘‘International Year of

the Reef’’ by the coral reef research community and over

40 national and international scientific, conservation, and

academic organizations: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress to recognize

3 the significance of maintaining the health and stability of

4 coral reef ecosystems, by—

5 (1) promoting comprehensive stewardship for

6 coral reef ecosystems;

7 (2) encouraging research and education on

8 coral reef ecosystems; and
3

HCON 8 IH

1 (3) improving the coordination of coral reef ef2 forts and activities which take place within Federal

3 agencies, academic institutions, nongovernmental or4 ganizations and industry.

Æ
### Faulk, Scott (OST) From: Sent: To:

Cc:
Subject: Attachments: Greetings All: Faulk, Scott (OST) Thursday, January 08, 2015 10:01 AM 'AirportManager@co.imperial.ca.us'; 'Hall@scag.ca.gov'; 'Jamie Jones (Jamie.Jones@Davidturch.com)'; 'sandygutierrez@co.imperial.ca.us';

. . . , 'CarlaBanda@co.imperial.ca.us'; 'Cheryi.Walker@Rabobank.com'; · 'cityclerk@cityofimperial.org'; 'JEdney@ci.el-centro.ca.us'; 'EiizabethMoreno@co.imperial.ca.us'; 'EZarate@ci.el-centro.ca.us'; 'jgalvan@cityofimperial.org'; 'Liz.Murguia@mail.house.gov'; 'MBest@cityofimperial.org'; 'GDDale@prodigy.net'; 'ralphcordova@co.imperial.ca.us'; 'sandygutierrez@co.imperial.ca.us'; 'supvleimgruber@co.imperial.ca.us' Great Lakes, Chuck Howell (chowell@flygreatlakes.com); Great Lakes, Doug Voss (DVoss@flygreatlakes.com); SeaPort Airlines, EAS Mailbox (eas@seaportair.com); geoff@seaportair.com; Rob McKinney; 'Tim Sieber' Update on EAS at El Centro
- Great Lakes.pdf; SeaPort.pdf

I would like to update you onthe Essential Air Service (EAS) situation at El Centro, as well as give you an opportunity to offer any comments for the formal record before we submit a recommendationto the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs. As you know, the Departmentissued Order 2014-12-2, on December 3, 2014, whichrequestedproposals from air carriers interested inproviding EAS atEl Centro for a newterm. In response to the Department's request, Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. and SeaPortAirlines, Inc. submittedproposals for consideration. I have attachedthose proposals to this email and expect themto be uploaded on www.regulations.gov sometime this afternoon. I requestthatyoureview the proposals and submit any comments you may have as soon as possible, butno laterthan February 13, 2015. Please send your comments directly to me viae-mail at scott.faulk@dot.gov. Also, please forward this to all relevant parties that I have not included onthe distribution list. Ifyou have any questions, feel free to contact me. Kind Regards, Scott Faulk U.S. Department ofTransportation EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 202-366-9967

1
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 273 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 273

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the annual rate at which the 
    International Monetary Fund charges interest on loans should be 
comparable to the average annual rate of interest in financial markets 
          for loans of comparable maturity, adjusted for risk.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 1998

  Mr. Royce submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Banking and Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Congress that the annual rate at which the 
    International Monetary Fund charges interest on loans should be 
comparable to the average annual rate of interest in financial markets 
          for loans of comparable maturity, adjusted for risk.

Whereas International Monetary Fund (IMF) structural adjustment loans are 
        extended at subsidized rates, and are equivalent to a transfer of wealth 
        from taxpayers in the United States and other countries to those 
        countries accessing International Monetary Fund credit;
Whereas subsidized loans distort markets and create inefficiencies that impede 
        economic development;
Whereas subsidized International Monetary Fund loans have often proven to be 
        ineffectual and even harmful as a means of promoting economic 
        development; and
Whereas market-based interest rates are determined by the borrower's 
        creditworthiness, a factor ignored by the International Monetary Fund: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that the annual rate at which the 
International Monetary Fund charges interest on loans should be, at a 
minimum, comparable to the average annual rate of interest in financial 
markets for loans of comparable maturity, adjusted for risk.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 12.2**

 

**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, Alberto Fornaro, certify that:

 

1.              I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of International Game Technology PLC;

 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.              Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.              The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have

 

(a)                     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)                     Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)                      Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

5.              The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)                     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)                     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| By:    | /s/   Alberto Fornaro     |   |
|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|   | Alberto   Fornaro         |   |
|   | Chief   Financial Officer |   |

 

 

Dated May 15, 2015

 

----
No. 11-10417.

#### In re Helton.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the “Quarterly Report”) of
      Amnutria Dairy Inc. (the “Registrant”) for the fiscal quarter ended September
      30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, I, Shu Kaneko, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director of the
      Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Registrant.




By: 
              /s/  Shu KanekoShu
                Kaneko
              Chief
                Financial Officer, Secretary and Director
              (Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)
              Dated
                this19thday
                of November, 2007
No. 11-1440.

#### Carolina Chloride, Inc. *v.*Richland County, South Carolina.

Sup. Ct. S. C. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1


                               February 3, 1997



Nuevo Energy Company
1331 Lamar, Suite 1650
Houston, Texas 77010

     Re:  Distribution of up to 1,400,000 additional shares of Common Stock of
          Nuevo Energy Company pursuant to the 1993 Stock Incentive Plan

Gentlemen:

     We have acted as legal counsel for Nuevo Energy Company, a Delaware
corporation ("Company"), in connection with the offer to certain of the
directors, officers, employees, and consultants of the Company and its
subsidiaries of a total of up to 1,400,000 additional shares (the "Shares") of
the Company's common stock, $.01 par value per share ("Common Stock"), issuable
pursuant to the Company's 1993 Stock Incentive Plan ("Plan"), which were made
available for distribution pursuant to an amendment to the Plan adopted on April
12, 1996, subject to shareholder approval, which increased the number of shares
of Common Stock available for distribution under the Plan by 1,400,000 shares.

     We have made such inquiries and examined such documents as we have
considered necessary or appropriate for the purposes of giving the opinion
hereinafter set forth, including the examination of executed or conformed
counterparts, or copies certified or otherwise proved to our satisfaction of the
following:

     (i)   the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company as filed with the
           Secretary of State of Delaware on March 2, 1990, as amended;

    (ii)   the Bylaws of the Company as of the date of this opinion;

   (iii)   the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 covering the Shares
           ("Registration Statement");

    (iv)   the Plan; and

     (v)   such other documents, corporate records, certificates and other
           instruments as we have deemed necessary or appropriate for the
           purpose of this opinion.
<PAGE>
 
Nuevo Energy Company
February 3, 1997
Page 2


     We have assumed the genuineness and authenticity of all signatures on all
original documents, the authenticity of all documents submitted to us as
originals, the conformity to originals of all documents submitted to us as
copies and the due authorization, execution, delivery or recordation of all
documents where due authorization, execution or recordation are prerequisites to
the effectiveness thereof.

     Based upon the foregoing, and having regard for such legal considerations
as we deem relevant, we are of the opinion that:

     The Shares of Common Stock covered by the Registration Statement have been
     duly authorized and when issued and sold in accordance with the Plan, will
     be legally issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

     We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion with the Commission as an
exhibit to the Registration Statement.


                                             Very truly yours,

 
                                            
                                             /s/ Butler & Binion, L.L.P.
                                             ___________________________
                                             BUTLER & BINION, L.L.P.