alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 8 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 8

 Electing Elizabeth B. Greene, as the Secretary of the Majority of the 
                                Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Dole submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Electing Elizabeth B. Greene, as the Secretary of the Majority of the 
                                Senate.

    Resolved, That Elizabeth B. Greene, of Virginia, be and she is 
hereby elected Secretary for the Majority, beginning January 4, 1995.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Gabriel Oshel LEWIS, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 17-6266

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 29, 2017

Decided: January 24, 2018

Seth A. Neyhart, STARK LAW GROUP, PLLC, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, for Appellant. Robert J. Dodson, Genna Danelle Petre, Special Assistant United States Attorneys, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*234PER CURIAM:

Gabriel Oshel Lewis appeals the district court’s order committing him to the custody and care of the Attorney General pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4246 (2012). On appeal, counsel has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that there are no meritorious issues for appeal but questioning whether the district court’s findings in hospitalizing Lewis under 18 U.S.C. § 4246 were clearly erroneous. Although advised of his right to file a supplemental pro se brief, Lewis has not done so. The Government declined to file a response brief. We affirm.

After a hearing, the district court found by clear and convincing evidence that Lewis “is presently suffering from a mental disease or defect as a result of which his release would create a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person or serious damage to the property of another” and ordered that Lewis be committed to the custody and care of the Attorney General. A district court’s finding of dangerousness under 18 U.S.C., § 4246 is a factual determination this court will not overturn unless it is clearly erroneous. *United States v. Cox,*964 F.2d 1431, 1433 (4th Cir. 1992). Our review of the record leads us to conclude that the district court did not clearly err in its finding.

In accordance with *Anders,*we also have reviewed the entire record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore affirm the district court’s order that Lewis be civilly committed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4246. This court requires that counsel inform Lewis, in writing, of the right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Lewis requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on Lewis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C SECTION 1350)








The undersigned, as the Chairman of the
Board and Chief Executive Officer of Matria Healthcare, Inc., certifies that, to
the best of his knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2008, which accompanies this certification fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Matria
Healthcare, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.  The
foregoing certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other
purpose.







MATRIA HEALTHCARE, INC.May
      6, 2008
              By:
              /s/ 
      Parker H. PetitParker
      H. PetitChairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Matria Healthcare, Inc. and will be
retained by Matria Healthcare, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.





The information in this Exhibit 32.1
shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, except as shall be
expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
Port Everglades Energy Center

Flajole, Andy to: Andrew Parks 09/12/2012 12:31 PM

Cc: "Foster, Stacy"

History: This message has been replied to and forwarded.

Hi Andrew,

Please find attached the additional information on minor emissions sources associated with the Port

Everglades Energy Center project that FPL has prepared in response to your request. Please let us know

at your earliest convenience if this additional information is sufficient or if you have additional

questions. Also, FPL would appreciate written confirmation of our understanding that EPA’s review of

the archeological and cultural resources evaluation performed in support of the project’s state license

application has been deemed satisfactory and that no additional action is required to support processing

of the GHG permit application.

Thank You,



# Andy Flajole

Environmental Services

(561) 691

‐ 2766

Proposed GHG Emission Limits for PEEC Minor Sources.pd f Proposed Emission Sources.pd
**EXHIBIT ITEM 32.2**

 

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

 

The certification setforth below is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission solelyfor the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of theUnited States Code.

 

November 20, 2007

 

Bruce N. Warner, the Chief Financial Officer ofNorthern California Bancorp, Inc. certifies:

 

a.               that this quarterly report on Form10-QSB/A, Amendment No. 1 for the period ended March 31, 2007 fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

b.              that information contained in thisquarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A, Amendment 1 for the period ended March 31,2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Northern California Bancorp, Inc.

 

 
|   | /s/ Bruce N. Warner                                        |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |      Bruce  N. Warner             |
|   |      Chief  Financial Officer and |
|   |      Principal Accounting Officer |

 

----
About DEQ I CcntactDEQ I Sltemap I Fe!dback I DEQ Seilrctl 

## OregonDepartmentof

## EnvironmentalQuality
ProJects and Programs Publlcllllons and Fcnns Laws and**~ul&aons** Public Notices Permits and Ucenss Datzlb•s!GIS DEQHolr1e I Dl•lslons I Regions I Cclmllnlon


## WaterQuality TGtalltfliiXlmum DallyLDildlll(TNDis) Ptvgl'llm

• TMDLs Home 

### onaonlMDLa

### Approved

## brEPA- 1"1through lift • General Into • Tools/Modeling • TMDL.s approved after 1999

• Implementation 

### WaterbodyWater 1MDL USEPA 

### Completed COmpleted
• Related Into (Baaln) Quality Parammn Approval TMDL 1MDL 

### Conearn Data 

### 5egmanta 

### saama.a • COntacts 

### Addreued IWBalin (cunallltlve) Selecta Basin: Gam son Algae, Phospllarus 10/07/1988 

### 1 1 • Basin Map Lake .Aquauc (South Weeds • Basin/ coast) Subbasin Ust TUalatin 

### DO Ammonia 10/07/1988 

### 12 13 RIVer • Stxlnnwatl!r (WIIIamette) l!lllb-Proarama COlumbia

# a. Fish Dioxin 0:1/25/1991 

# • 21 • 401 cerutrc:auon Wlllamette consumpUon, • aean Water RIVers Wildlife 

### state Revolving BearO'eek Algae, 

### DO, Ammonia, 3/16/1992 

### 3 Fund (Rogue) pH 

### BOD, • construction Phospllarus ActiVIties aearLake Protedfon

## ot Phospllarus 03/16/1992 

### 1 Z5 • Industrial (Mid coast) Watl!rSupply ActiVIties Yamhill Algae, pH Phospllarus 1:1/08/1992 

### 3 28 • Municipal RIVer Stxlnnwatl!r (WIIIamette)
• Underground Pudding 

### DO Ammonia, 10/18/1993 

### 18 InJectionWells RIVer 

### BOD (WIIIamette) 

### WQ Info&uldea: TUalatin Algae, pH Phospllarus Ol/27/1994 

### 12 

### H

• by alphabet RIVer (WIIIamette) 

### • by catl!gory Rickreall 

### DO 

### BOD 04/18/1994 :1. 

### 57 O'eek (WIIIamette) Coast Fork Algae, 

### DO, Ammonia, 05/17/1996 

### 2 Wlllamette pH Phospharus RIVer (WIIIamette)Coquille R DO BOD 07/03/1996 

### 3 62 (South Coast) Columbia Water Chlorophyll 11/25/1998 

### 10 72 Slough Contact, DO, a, Dissolved (Willamette) pH, Algae, Oxygen, pH, Fish Phosphorus, Consumption Bacteria, DOE/DDT, PCBs, Pb (lead), Dieldrin and 2,3,7,8 TCDD (dioxin) Upper Temperature Ternperature 05/04/1999 

### 1 73 Sucker Creek (Rogue) [print version]
For more information about DEQ'sTotal Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) Progam contact Gene Foster by phone at 503-229-5325 or by email, or contact the appropriate Basin Coordinator

. Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Headquarters: 811 SW Sixth Ave., Portland, OR 97204-1390 Phone: 503-229-5696 or toll free in Oregon 1-800-452-4011 Oregon Telecommunications Relay Service: 1-800-735-2900 FAX: 503-229-6124 The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality is a regulatory agency authorized to protect Oregon's environment by the State ofOregon and the Environmental Protection Agency

. DEQ Web site privacy notice Projects and Programs Publications and Forms Laws and Regulations Public Notices Permits and Licenses Databases/GIS About DEQ 1Contact DEQ 1 Sitemap 1Feedback
#### TYLER, R. v. TYLER, Z.

835 WDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/01/2017

962 C.D. 1995

(McKean)

Affirmed
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of Deer Valley Acquisition Corporation
 (the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2014 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James Cassidy
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer
Date: March 31, 2015
# C_2018063EN.01000301.xml

| 19.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/3

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 December 2017 — Ireland v Aughinish Alumina Ltd, European Commission

(Case C-369/16 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - State aid - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Exemption from excise duty on mineral oils used as fuel for alumina production - Existing or new aid - Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Article 1(b)(i) and (iv), and (d) - Limitation - Article 15 - Principle of legal certainty - Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations))

(2018/C 063/03)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Ireland (represented by: E. Creedon, L. Williams and A. Joyce, acting as Agents, and by P. McGarry, Senior Counsel)

Appellant:

Intervener in support of the appellant: French Republic (represented by: R. Coesme and D. Colas, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Aughinish Alumina Ltd (represented by: C. Little and C. Waterson, Solicitors), European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka and N. Khan, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal.

| 2. | Orders Ireland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ireland to pay the costs.

| 3. | Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 371, 10.10.2016.

1

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 57 (Thursday, March 24, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 16819]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06216]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 04/04-0308]

Plexus Fund II, L.P.; Surrender of License of Small Business 
Investment Company

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration under the Small Business Investment Act of 
1958, as amended, under Section 309 of the Act and Section 107.1900 of 
the Small Business Administration Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 
107.1900) to function as a small business investment company under the 
Small Business Investment Company License No. 04/04-0308 issued to 
Plexus Fund II, L.P. said license is hereby declared null and void.

United States Small Business Administration.
Bailey DeVries,
Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation.
[FR Doc. 2022-06216 Filed 3-23-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
#### Geronimo Rene GUTIERREZ, Petitioner-Appellant v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent-Appellee

No. 16-70028

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 14, 2017

Alan Futrell, San Antonio, TX, David Weiss, Center for Death Penalty Litigation, Durham, NC, for Petitioner-Appellant

Matthew Dennis Ottoway, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, Postconviction Litigation Division, Austin, TX, for Respondent-Appellee

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

On August 30, 2017, we granted Appellant’s motion to stay proceedings in order to allow him to pursue an *Atkins*claim in state court in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in *Moore v. Texas,*— U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 1039, 197 L.Ed.2d 416 (2017). Because we granted Appellant’s motion based on his *Atkins*argument, we had no need to determine whether a stay was warranted pending the Supreme Court’s decision in *Wilson v. Sellers,*— U.S. *205-, 137 S.Ct. 1203, 197 L.Ed.2d 245 (2017). We again decline to reach the merits of Appellant’s *Sellers*argument.

However, we granted a stay premised on Appellant’s statement that he would promptly file his *Atkins*claim within ninety days of the Court’s stay order. Appellant failed to do so, instead filing a “status update” informing the court that he requires until February 26, 2018, to do so. We treat Appellant’s status update as a motion for extension of time to file and, finding good cause, GRANT that motion.

IT IS ORDERED that Appellant shall have until February 26, 2018, to file his new *Atkins*claim.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ap-pellee’s motion for clarification, ECF No. 61, is DENIED as moot.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 35.1 

Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation 

**NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

The undersigned, Kevin J. Cullum, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows: 

(1) The undersigned has caused a reviewof the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Sale and ServicingAgreement, dated as of December 10, 2014 (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, individually and as servicer, Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II, as seller, and Nissan Auto Receivables2014-B Owner Trust, to be conducted under his supervision; and 

(2) To the best of theundersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB forpublicly-issued asset-backed securities. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 26th day of June, 2018.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 A1 38 6 . PHI LLI P CONNELL v . FARMERS AND MERCHANTS BANK.

Ph i l li p Co n n el l fi l ed a n o t i ce o f ap p eal fro m t h e t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd ers co m p el l i n g

arb i t rat i on , d en y i n g h is m o t io n fo r l eav e t o f i l e co u nt ercl ai m s , an d d en y i n g h i s

m o ti o n to co m

p el t h e p ro d u ct i o n o f d o cu m en t s

. Al t h o u g h t he o rd er d i rect i n g t h e

p art i es to p ro ceed t o b i n d i ng arb i t rat i o n fo r al l cro s s cl ai m s is lab el ed “ Fi n al Ord er,”

i t i s cl ear th at n o act ual fi n al o rd er h as b een e n t e r e d i n t h e cas e. Th e o rd ers t h at

Co n n el l wi s h es t o ap peal are in t erl o cu t o ry in nat u re. See Go s h ayes h i v. Meh r a b i a n , 2 3 2 Ga. Ap p . 8 1 , 8 2 (5 0 1 SE2 d 2 6 5 ) (1 9 9 8 ) (o rd er co m p el l i n g arb i trat i o n is a n o n

fi nal ru l i n g ); Jo hn s on & Jo h n s o n v. Ka u f ma n , 2 2 6 Ga. A p p

. 7 7

, 7 8 (4 8 5 Se2 d 5 2 5 )

(1 9 9 7) (d i s co v ery o rd ers gen eral l y are i nt erl o cu t o ry an d n o t d i rect l y ap peal ab l e as

fi nal ju d g m en t s ). “ A part y s eek i n g ap p el l at e rev i ew fro m an i n t erl o cu t o ry ord er m u s t

fo l l o w t h e i n t erl o cu t o ry ap p l i cat i o n p ro ced u re

. . . , wh i ch i n cl u d es o b t ai n i n g a

cert ifi cat e o f i m

m ed i at e rev iew fro m th e t ri al co u rt

. ” Pa ce Co n s t r

. Co r p

. v. No r t h

p a r k

As s o cs

. , 2 1 5 Ga. Ap p

. 43 8

, 4 3 9 (4 5 0 SE2 d 82 8 ) (1 9 9 4 ); s ee al s o OCGA § 5 -6 -3 4 (b ).

Co n n el l ’ s fai l u re to fo l l o w t h e i n t erl o cu t o ry ap p eal p r o c e d u re d ep ri v es u s o f

ju ri s d i ct i o n o v er t h is ap p eal , wh i ch i s t h erefo re DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t if y t h a t th e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 04/16/2015 April 16, 2015
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 18

Relating to the reappointment of Michael Davidson as Senate Legal Counsel.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. LOTT (for Mr. DOLE) submitted the following resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Relating to the reappointment of Michael Davidson as Senate

Legal Counsel.

1 Resolved, That the reappointment of Michael David2 son to be Senate Legal Counsel made by the President

3 pro tempore of the Senate this day is effective as of Janu4 ary 3, 1995, and the term of service of the appointee shall

5 expire at the end of the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

Æ
**Exhibit      32.1**

|                                                          |         |                                                |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Signed                  on this 27 day of November, 2007 | By:          | /s/ Tony              Tong                     |   |
|                                                          | Name:   | Tony              Tong                              |   |
|                                                          | Title:  | Chief                Executive Officer              |   |
|                                                          |         | (Principal                Executive Officer )  |   |

|                                                            |         |                                           |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Signed                    on this 27 day of November, 2007 | By:          | /s/ Daniel                Lui             |   |
|                                                            | Name:   | Daniel                Lui                      |   |
|                                                            | Title:  | Chief                  Financial Officer       |   |
|                                                            |         | (Principal                  Financial Officer) |   |