alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 59 (Monday, March 28, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 17180-17181]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06431]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket No. USCG-2022-0183]

Special Local Regulations; Seventh Coast Guard District, Blessing 
of the Fleet--St. Augustine

AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

ACTION: Notification of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce special local regulations for the 
Blessing of the Fleet--St. Augustine on April 10, 2022, to provide for 
the safety of life on navigable waterways during this event. Our 
regulation for marine events within the Seventh Coast Guard District 
identifies the regulated area for this event in St. Augustine, FL. 
During the enforcement periods, the operator of any vessel in the 
regulated area must comply with directions from the Patrol Commander or 
any Official Patrol displaying a Coast Guard ensign.

[[Page 17181]]

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 100.701, Table 1 to Sec.  100.701, 
section (c), Item 8, will be enforced from 12:00 p.m. until 3:00 p.m., 
on April 10, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
notification of enforcement, call or email MST2 Shawn Keeman, Sector 
Jacksonville, Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; 
telephone 904-714-7661, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce special local 
regulations in 33 CFR 100.701, Table 1 to Sec.  100.701, section (c), 
Item 8, for the Blessing of the Fleet--St. Augustine regulated from 
12:00 a.m. until 3:00 p.m., on April 10, 2022. This action is being 
taken to provide for the safety of life on navigable waterways during 
the event. Our regulation for recurring marine events within the 
Seventh Coast Guard District, Sec.  100.701, Table 1 to Sec.  100.701, 
section (c), Item 8, specifies the location of the regulated area for 
the Blessing of the Fleet--St. Augustine which encompasses portions of 
the Matanzas River at the St. Augustine Municipal Marina. During the 
enforcement periods, as reflected in in Sec.  100.701, if you are the 
operator of a vessel in the regulated area you must comply with 
directions from the Patrol Commander or any Official Patrol displaying 
a Coast Guard ensign.
    In addition to this notification of enforcement in the Federal 
Register, the Coast Guard plans to provide notification of this 
enforcement period via the Local Notice to Mariners, marine information 
broadcasts, local radio stations and area newspapers.

    Dated: March 22, 2022.
M.R. Vlaun,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Jacksonville.
[FR Doc. 2022-06431 Filed 3-25-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7698 

BARRY L. HARRIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CAPTAIN HAWKINS, Captain/Security; SERGEANT

WYNN, Sergeant/Security; OFFICER TALLEY,

Officer/Security,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior

District Judge. (CA-05-567-2-RGD)

Submitted: January 26, 2006 Decided: February 3, 2006

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barry L. Harris, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Barry L. Harris appeals the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice his complaint filed under 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Harris v. Hawkins, No. CA-05-567-2-RGD (E.D.

Va. Oct. 11, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Lou TYLER, Plaintiff-Appellant v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, L.L.C.; Deutsche Bank, Defendants-Appellees

No. 16-11596 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed January 30, 2018

Lou Tyler, Pro Se

Before PRADO, ELROD, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Lou Tyler moves this court for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in her appeal of the district court’s dismissal of her civil action against Ocwen Loan Servicing, L.L.C., and Deutsche Bank. Tyler’s motion is a challenge to the district court’s determination that her appeal is not taken in good faith. *See Baugh v. Taylor,*117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997).

Before this court, Tyler asserts that foreclosure on her property would be improper because the defendants are barred from enforcing their interest by the statute of limitations and that the defendants have engaged in a variety of wrongdoings. By merely asserting claims, Tyler fails to address the district court’s certification that her appeal was not taken in good faith and the district court’s reasons for its certification decision. *See Baugh,*117 F.3d at 202. In particular, Tyler does not factually or legally challenge the district court’s determination that Tyler’s civil action that is based on the “show-me-the-note” theory is meritless.

Pro se briefs are afforded liberal construction. *See Yohey v. Collins,*985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993). Nevertheless, when an appellant fails to identify any error in the district court’s analysis, it is the same as if the appellant had not appealed that issue. *See Brinkmann v. Dallas Cty. Deputy Sheriff Abner,*813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Because Tyler has failed to challenge the certification that her appeal is not taken in good faith and the reasons for such a certification, she has abandoned the critical issue of her appeal. *Id.*Thus, the appeal lacks arguable merit and is frivolous. *See Howard*v. *King,*707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Accordingly, Tyler’s motion for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED, and her appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. *See Baugh,*117 F.3d at 202 n.24; 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Further, Tyler is CAUTIONED that future frivolous or repetitive filings in this court will result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal, monetary sanctions, and restrictions on her ability to file pleadings in this court or any court subject to this court’s jurisdiction.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.’5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

| (1)    | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period                ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                Act of                1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| (2)    | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company.                                                                                                                                                        |
OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE


I,  Karen  Montbach,  a  Managing  Director  of  Citibank,  N.A.  (the  "Company"),  hereby  certify,
with  respect  to  the  Pooling  and  Servicing  Agreement,  dated  as  of  October  1,  2014  (the
"Agreement"),  by  and  among  Citigroup  Commercial  Mortgage  Securities  Inc.,  as  depositor,
Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association, as master servicer, Rialto
Capital  Advisors,  LLC,  as  special  servicer,  Park  Bridge  Lender  Services  LLC,  as  operating
advisor,  Citibank,  N.A.,  as  certificate  administrator  (the  "Certificate  Administrator"),  and
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, the following:

1.
A  review  of  the  Company's  activities  as  Certificate  Administrator  during  the
reporting  period  ending  December  31,  2014  and  its  performance  under  the  Agreement
has been made under my supervision.

2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, as of and for the  reporting
period ending December 31, 2014, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under
the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

This statement is given by the undersigned as an authorized officer of the Company and not in
the undersigned's individual capacity.

Date:  February 27, 2015

Citibank, N.A.


By: __/s/ Karen Montbach________
Name: Karen Montbach
Title:  Managing Director
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Felipe MANGUAL, a/k/a Darin Harris, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6621

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 30, 2017

Decided: December 27, 2017

James Wyda, Federal Public Defender, Sapna Mirchandani, Appellate Attorney, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant. Stephen M. Schenning, Acting United States Attorney, David I. Salem, Assistant United States Attorney, Ellen E. Cobb, Kristine Dietz Cowherd, Special Assistant United States Attorneys, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

■ Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Luis Felipe Mangual, Jr. appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order and deny Mangual’s motion to place the appeal in abeyance for a case pending in this court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                --------------


                                CERTIFICATIONS
                                --------------

I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


      1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
            10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
            report on Form 10-K of Alternative Loan Trust 2006-45T1 (the
            "Exchange Act periodic reports");

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as
            a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
            omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
            made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
            were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
            this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
            other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the
            period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act
            periodic reports;

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
            conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s)
            required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and
            except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the
            servicer(s) have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
            agreement(s) in all material respects; and

      5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
            criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
            reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
            asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
            accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
            13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
            except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
            instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
            disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
      information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
      Bank of New York, as Trustee.

Date: March 27, 2007


      /s/ Steve Bailey
      -----------------------
      Steve Bailey
      Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 60

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and the

House of Representatives.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 23, 1996

Mr. LOTT submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was considered

and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the

Senate and the House of Representatives.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That when the Senate recesses or adjourns

3 at the close of business on Thursday, May 23, 1996, Fri4 day, May 24, 1996, or Saturday, May 25, 1996, pursuant

5 to a motion made by the majority leader or his designee

6 in accordance with this resolution, it stand recessed or ad7 journed until noon on Monday, June 3, 1996, Tuesday,

8 June 4, 1996 or until such time on that day as may be

9 specified by the majority leader or his designee in the mo10 tion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day
2

SCON 60 ATS

1 after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to sec2 tion 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first;

3 and that when the House adjourns on the legislative day

4 of Thursday, May 23, 1996, it stand adjourned until 2:00

5 p.m. on Wednesday, May 29, 1996, or until noon on the

6 second day after Members are notified to reassemble pur7 suant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever

8 occurs first.

9 SEC. 2. The majority leader of the Senate and the

10 Speaker of the House, acting jointly after consultation

11 with the minority leader of the Senate and the minority

12 leader of the House, shall notify the Members of the Sen13 ate and House, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

14 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Æ
EXHIBIT 10.28a



          FIRST AMENDMENT TO REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AGREEMENT

         THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AGREEMENT (the
"Amendment") is made and entered into as of the 17th day of January, 2001, by
and between TROUT CREEK PROPERTIES, LLC ("Seller") and CRESCENT RESOURCES, LLC,
formerly know as Crescent Resources, Inc. ("Buyer").

                                    RECITALS

         A. Seller and Buyer entered into that certain Real Estate Purchase
Agreement (the "Agreement") dated November 29, 2000, wherein Buyer agreed to
purchase from Seller and Seller agreed to sell to Buyer certain real property
located in Pasco County, Florida, described therein (the "Premises") in
accordance with the terms and conditions of such Agreement.

         B.       Seller and Buyer desire to extend the Investigation Period
under the Agreement to March 30, 2001.

                                    AGREEMENT

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual
covenants contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration,
Seller and Buyer do hereby agree as follows:

         1.       Investigation  Period.  The  Investigation  Period  described
in Paragraph 3  of the Agreement is hereby  extended to expire at 5:00 PM
local time in Tampa, Florida on March 30, 2001.

         2.       Ratification  of Agreement.  This  Amendment shall control any
conflicting  provisions of the  Agreement,  which is hereby ratified and
confirmed by Buyer and Seller.

         3.       Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in two (2) or
more counterparts,  each of which shall be taken to be an original.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as
of the day and year first above written.

SELLER:                                     BUYER:

TROUT CREEK PROPERTIES, LLC         CRESCENT RESOURCES, LLC

By: /s/ Brian P. Burns              By: /s/ Michael Wiggins
    --------------------------          ------------------------------
Name:   Brian P. Burns              Name: Michael Wiggins
Title:  Chairman                    Title: Vice President
Date:   17 Jan 2001                 Date: 1-17-01
Exhibit 99.1




Annual Servicer’s Certificate


Provided by Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation


to Holders of Notes and Certificates









NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION




OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE




The undersigned, Michael J. McConnell, Vice-President of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as an Authorized Officer of the Company:






(1)           The undersigned has caused a review, under his supervision, to be made of:  i) the activities; and ii) the performance under the Agreement, of the Company during the period October 15, 2014 through March 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”); and






(2)           To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, i) the Company has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects during the Reporting Period; and ii) no Servicer Default has occurred.






This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to (i) Section 3.01(c) of the Servicing Agreement, as may be amended, modified or supplemented from time to time, dated as of March 1, 1999, by and among Nissan-Infiniti LT, NILT Trust, as UTI Beneficiary, and the Company, as Servicer; and (ii) Section 8.11(b) of the 2014-B SUBI Servicing Supplement, dated as of October 15, 2014, by and among Nissan-Infiniti LT, as Titling Trust, NILT Trust, as Grantor and UTI Beneficiary, and the Company, as Servicer (the “Agreement”).






Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein have the meaning assigned to them in the Agreement.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 26th day of June, 2015.




/s/ Michael J. McConnell________________


Michael J. McConnell


Vice President
Exhibit 4.2


 


THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED HEREBY HAVE
NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 (THE "ACT") OR APPLICABLE STATE LAW AND MAY NOT BE OFFERED, SOLD,
OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED, PLEDGED, OR HYPOTHECATED UNLESS AND UNTIL REGISTERED UNDER THE ACT OR STATE LAW OR, IN THE OPINION OF
COUNSEL IN FORM AND SUBSTANCE SATISFACTORY TO THE ISSUER OF THE SECURITIES, SUCH OFFER, SALE, OR TRANSFER, PLEDGE, OR HYPOTHECATION
IS IN COMPLIANCE THEREWITH.


 


 


DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE


 


 


	Principal Amount: US$44,700.00	Issuance Date: January 1, 2017


 


 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Edgar Express, Inc., a Utah
corporation (the “Company”), hereby promises to pay to Acadia Group, Inc. (“Holder”), the principal sum
of Forty Four Thousand Seven Hundred Dollars in lawful money of the United States of America (US$44,700.00) (the “Principal
Amount”), with interest on the unpaid balance thereof compounding at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum from the date
hereof.


 


The entire Principal Amount together with all
accrued but unpaid interest shall be due and payable on the date of receipt of written demand of the holder. Any payments made
on this Note will be applied first to any costs and expenses, then to accrued interest, and then to reduction of principal, or
as otherwise determined at Holder's discretion.


 


Payments of both principal and interest are
to be made to the address of the Holder or such other place as the Holder shall designate to the Company in writing.


 


Upon surrender of this Note for registration
of transfer, duly endorsed, or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer duly executed, by the registered Holder or its attorney
duly authorized in writing, a new note for a like principal amount will be issued to, and registered in the name of, the transferee.
The Company may treat the person in whose name this Note is registered as the owner hereof for the purpose of receiving payment
and for all other purposes, and the Company shall not be affected by any notice to the contrary.


 


In the case of an Acceleration Event, the principal
amount of this Note, together with all interest accrued thereon, may be declared immediately due and payable. For purposes hereof,
“Acceleration Event” shall mean the entry of a decree or order for relief by a court having jurisdiction in the premises
in respect of the Company in any voluntary or involuntary case or proceedings under the United States bankruptcy laws or the appointment
of a receiver, liquidator, assignee, custodian, trustee, sequestrator (or similar official) for the Company or for any substantial
part of its property, or ordering the winding-up or liquidation of its affairs


 


The terms of this Note shall be governed and
construed according to the laws of the State of Utah.


 


 


	 	EDGAR EXPRESS, INC.
	 	 
	 	/s/ Mary Foster
	 	Mary Foster, Chief Executive Officer