alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from  
consolidated financial statements of Ceramics Process Systems 
Corporation and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 26, 1998.  

</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1998
<CASH>                                       1,000,196
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  789,205
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    307,553
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,114,610
<PP&E>                                         712,537
<DEPRECIATION>                                 952,384
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,827,147
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          438,762
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    12,307,186
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,827,147
<SALES>                                      1,260,767
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,260,767
<CGS>                                          798,503
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  961,464
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,391
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                396,281
<INCOME-TAX>                                    30,274
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            366,007
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   366,007
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-20329

Conference Calendar

 

ULYSSES JOHNSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLE;

OTHER UNKNOWN NAMED AGENCIES,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-02-CV-611

--------------------

February 19, 2003

Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ulysses Johnson, Texas prisoner # 794106, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) as frivolous and for failure to

state a claim. Johnson argues that he has been denied parole

based upon false and misleading information provided to the Texas

Board of Pardons & Parole by a parole review officer, thereby

depriving him of a due process liberty interest. 
No. 02-20329

-2-

Texas law does not create an expectation of release on

parole, and Johnson does not have a constitutional right to

release. See Orellana v. Kyle, 65 F.3d 29, 32 (5th Cir. 1995);

Williams v. Briscoe, 641 F.2d 274, 276-77 (5th Cir. 1981). 

Johnson’s allegations do not amount to a federal constitutional

violation. See Johnson v. Rodriguez, 110 F.3d 299, 308 (5th Cir.

1997).

Johnson’s appeal is wholly without arguable merit, is

frivolous, and is therefore DISMISSED. See Howard v. King,

707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. The

district court’s dismissal of his complaint counts as a “strike”

for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), as does this court’s

dismissal of the instant appeal. See Adepegba v. Hammons,

103 F.3d 383, 387 (5th Cir. 1996). 

We caution Johnson that if he accumulates three strikes, he

may not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal

filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless

he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28

U.S.C. § 1915(g).

DISMISSED; THREE-STRIKES WARNING ISSUED.
----

**WELLS**

FARGO 

 

Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor 

550 South Tryon Street 

Charlotte, NC 28202 

1-800-326-1334

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014, by and among Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special 

Servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Trust Advisor, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Certificate Registrar, Authenticating Agent and Custodian , with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C18 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. 

 

Pursuant to Section 13.9 of the Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that: 

 

1.        A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from September 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the "Reporting Period") , and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

2.        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 6th day of March 2015. 

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober 

Daniel Bober 

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank 

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
WATERSIDE VILLAGE LLC

VERSUS

UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD' S

LONDON ( LLOYD' S OF LONDON); 

CONVEX INSURANCE UK LIMITED

INSURANCE COMPANY

NO. 2023 CW 0428

JULY 28, 2023

In Re: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd' s London and Convex

Insurance UK Limited Insurance Company, applying for

supervisory writs, 21st Judicial District Court, 

Parish of Tangipahoa, No. 2022- 2769. 

BEFORE: HOLDRIDGE, CHUTZ, AND PENZATO, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

wHoldridge, J., concurs and would deny the writ application

on the showing made. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

A

t'" 

a\

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
PPEC Meeting @ EPA: Dec 9 @ 10:00 

Roger Kohn to: David Jenkins 11/22/2011 01:32 PM

Cc: "'W. David Jenkins'", "'Steve Hill'"

OK, I was able to get Fri Dec 9 at 10:00. EPA participants will be Amy Zimpfer, Gerardo Rios, Cleveland 

Holladay, and myself. Please tell me who will attend for PPEC in addition to you, when you get a chance.

All visitors are required to sign-in at the EPA Reception Desk and sign out when departing the building. 

We require visitors to sign-out so that we have an accurate accounting of who is in the building should an 

emergency occur. 

We look forward to seeing you on the 9th.

Roger Kohn

USEPA Region 9 - Air Division (AIR-3)

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901

415-972-3973 

kohn.roger@epa

"David Jenkins" Yes, I can make Friday, the 9th work. AM is be... 11/22/2011 12:37:14 PM

From: "David Jenkins" <davdjenk@gmail.com>

To: Roger Kohn/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, "'W. David Jenkins'" <djenkins@apexpowergroup.com>

Cc: "'Steve Hill'" <SHill@sierraresearch.com>

Date: 11/22/2011 12:37 PM

Subject: RE: PPEC Meeting @ EPA

Yes, I can make Friday, the 9

th

work. AM is better, but I can meet that afternoon if that’s what it takes. 

Thanks,

Dave

From: Kohn.Roger@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Kohn.Roger@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 2:30 PM

To: W. David Jenkins

Cc: David Jenkins; Steve Hill

Subject : PPEC Meeting @ EPA

Dave,

Trying to set up the meeting you requested. Proving to be somewhat challenging to find a time that 

works for both Amy and Gerardo. One day that would work for everyone here is Friday Dec 9. You 

didn't mention that in your email to Amy, but would that work for you and your team? Gerardo is out the 

following week, and Amy is out through the end of the year starting that week. So if the 9th doesn't work, 

we may need to wait until January (or meet without Amy or Gerardo).

I'm in the office today, then out until next Monday. If the 9th works for you, please let me know today so 

I can get the meeting on Amy and Gerardo's calendar. Thank you.
Roger Kohn

USEPA Region 9 - Air Division (AIR-3)

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901

415-972-3973 

kohn.roger@epa
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Aquarius Cannabis, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), Michael Davis Lawyer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|   |                                                                                                                                                            
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Annual Report, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|  
|2. | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|    |                                                                                                                           | 
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|By: | /s/ Michael Davis Lawyer                                                                                                  | 
|    | Michael Davis Lawyer                                                                                                      | 
|    | President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) | 



Dated: May 20, 2016
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 291 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 291

  Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp should be 
  issued to raise public awareness of diabetes and to promote public 
                     support for diabetes research.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 19, 1998

 Mr. Fox of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. Nethercutt, Ms. Furse, Mr. 
 McNulty, Mr. Baldacci, Ms. Lofgren, Ms. Kilpatrick, Mr. Cummings, Mr. 
 Romero-Barcelo, Mr. Towns, Mr. Underwood, Mr. Frost, Mr. Forbes, Mr. 
Sanders, and Mr. Pappas) submitted the following concurrent resolution; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp should be 
  issued to raise public awareness of diabetes and to promote public 
                     support for diabetes research.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) a postage stamp should be issued to raise public 
        awareness of diabetes and to promote public support for 
        diabetes research; and
            (2) the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend 
        to the Postmaster General that such a stamp be issued.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of Fox Valley Acquisition Corporation
 (the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2014 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James Cassidy
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer
Date: March 31, 2015
#### Santana CLINE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HSBC BANK USA, N.A.; Reisenfeld & Associates; Christopher Dawson, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-2354

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 15, 2018

Decided: February 16, 2018

*183Santana Cline, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Michael Williamson, BLANK ROME LLP, Washington, D.C.; Gregory Alan Stout, REISENFELD *&*ASSOCIATES LPA LLC, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Santana Cline seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to deny Cline’s motion for default judgment and to grant the motion of HSBC Bank USA, N.A., in opposition to the entry of default. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Cline seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. *See Adult Film Ass’n of Am., Inc. v. Thetford,*776 F.2d 113, 115 (5th Cir. 1985) (order denying default judgment); *Parks v. Collins,*761 F.2d 1101, 1104 (5th Cir. 1985) (order granting motion to set aside entry of default). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Advance Letter to Teacher

[date]

Dear <Teacher Name>,

Your district is participating in the Impact Evaluation of Support for Principals. The Institute of 

Education Sciences at the U.S. Department of Education has contracted with Mathematica Policy

Research and its partners to conduct this evaluation. As part of the study, we are asking a select 

group of teachers to complete an online survey in spring 2016 to gather information about 

professional development and instructional support you receive, leadership practices in your 

school, and the instructional environment at your school. We will also ask information about 

your educational background and experience. 

Responses to this data collection will be used only for research purposes. The reports prepared 

for this study will summarize findings across the sample and will not associate responses with a 

specific district or individual. We will not provide information that identifies you or your district 

to anyone outside the study team, except as required by law. Additionally, no one at your school 

or in your district will see your responses. While your participation is voluntary, your input is 

vital to the success of this study.

In the coming days, you will receive an email providing a link to the online survey and your 

username and password. We have also provided this information below for your records. The 

email will be sent to your school email address. If you would prefer future communications 

regarding this study be sent to a different email address, please provide the following 

information in an email to XXX@matheamtica-mpr.com: your name, school name, and the new 

email address that you would like us to use. 

Username: Password:

We estimate that the online questionnaire will take approximately 30 minutes to complete. As a 

thank you, you will receive a [check/gift card, as required by the district MOU] in the amount of

$30 once you have completed the survey.

If you have any questions regarding the survey or your login information, you can reach a study 

team member by phone at 866-XXX-XXXX or by email at XXX@mathematica-mpr.com.

Thank you for your help with this important study.

Sincerely,

[insert signature]

Pat Nemeth
Advance Letter to Teacher

Surveyy Director
No. 11-1396.

#### Gates *v.*Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-1318.

#### Alford *v.*Texas.

Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certio-rari denied.
2013.12.31 - 10K EX 10.15








December 16, 2013




John C. Wayne


Re:    Renewal of Amended and Restated Retention Agreement
Dear John:
This letter is to serve as your notification that Ply Gem Industries, Inc. has elected to execute its Renewal Term right under your current Amended and Restated Retention Agreement dated December 31, 2008 for a period of one year.  As such, all applicable rights and terms as outlined in your Amended and Restated Retention Agreement will remain in effect through December 31, 2014.
Please sign this letter in the space provided below as your acknowledgment and agreement of this Renewal Term agreement and return this original to me, and retain a copy for your own records.	
		
	 
	Sincerely,

	 
	 

	 
	PLY GEM INDUSTRIES, INC.

	 
	 

	 
	By:  /s/ Gary E. Robinette

	 
	Name:  Gary E. Robinette

	 
	Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	Acknowledged and Agreed:
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	/s/ John C. Wayne
	 

	John C. Wayne
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Emerald Dairy Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Shu Kaneko, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date:  August
      16, 2010
              By:
              /s/ 
      Shu KanekoName:
      Shu KanekoTitle: Chief Financial Officer and
      Secretary
                (Principal Financial and Accounting
      Officer)
SERVED JUNE 3, 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

'm 

IN THE MATTER OF 

BUD FISKE RAYMOND 

FAA DOCKET NO. CPlOWPOOOl 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMSNo. FAA-2010-0018 

AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER 

Paragraph #2 of the Procedural Order is amended as follows: 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the 

following procedural schedule: 

... On or before August 1, 2010, the parties shall conclude all discovery 

including, but not limited to, depositions, document production, responses to 

production requests and/or interrogatories. If the parties cannot resolve a 

discovery dispute they shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for resolution 

in a timely manner... 

ichard C. Gdodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law, 

Attachment - Service List 

The court does not anticipate scheduling this case prior to 1 August 2010. 
FAA Docket No. CPlOWPOOOl 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Arthur Wasserman, Respondent's Counsel 

Law Office of Arthur Wasserman 

16380 Roscoe Blvd., Suite 120 

VanNuys,CA 91406-1221 

TEL: 818-895-8234 

FAX: 818-895-0675 

Lierre Green, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Coimsel 

Western-Pacific Region, AWP-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7117 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building - Room 

2014, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
#### Dorothy E. PETRIS Plaintiff-Appellant v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Commissioner of Social Security Defendant-Appellee

No. 17-1163

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: December 27, 2017

Filed: January 2, 2018

James H. Green, Kansas City, MO, for Plaintiff-Appellant

*400Jeffrey P. Ray, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Kansas City, MO, Angela Gail Thornton-Millard, Assistant Regional Counsel, Social Security Administration, Office of General Counsel Region VII, Kansas City, MO, for Defendant-Ap-pellee

Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Dorothy E. Petris appeals the order of the district court1 affirming the Commissioner’s denial <?f supplemental security income. For reversal, Petris challenges the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ’s) physical and mental residual function capacity findings. Having reviewed the parties’ submissions and the record before us, we conclude that the ALJ’s determinations are supported by substantial competent evidence on the record as a whole and that Petris’s arguments do not support reversal. See Wildman v. Astrue, 596 F.3d 959, 969 (8th Cir. 2010). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Brian C. Wimes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.