alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 333

Expressing the sense of the Congress that public schools should conduct

ceremonies and other activities to educate and inform students about

the sacrifice and commitment of veterans of the United States Armed

Forces.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 2, 1998

Mr. REDMOND submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that public schools

should conduct ceremonies and other activities to educate

and inform students about the sacrifice and commitment

of veterans of the United States Armed Forces.

Whereas the men and women who have served in the United

States Armed Forces have made immeasurable sacrifices

for the principles of freedom and liberty that make this

Nation unique in all civilization;

Whereas veterans of the United States Armed Forces forever

carry the sense of duty, pride, and patriotism that they

developed in service to the Nation;

Whereas the values instilled in the Nation’s veterans should

be passed on to younger generations; and
2

•HCON 333 IH

Whereas the Congress established Veterans Day as a day for

observing and commemorating the sacrifices of all veterans: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that pub3 lic schools should conduct ceremonies and other activities

4 to educate and inform students about the sacrifice and

5 commitment of veterans of the United States Armed

6 Forces.

Æ
Order filed April 16, 2013.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00214

- CV

____________ BOMA O. ALLISON , Appellant

V.

SERVICE LLOYDS INSUR ANCE COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 412th District Court Brazoria County, Texas T rial Court Cause No. 67540



### O R D E R

This is an appeal from a judgment signed November 16, 2012. Appellant filed a timely motion for new trial. The noti ce of appeal was due February 14
, 2013. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant did not file the notice of appeal timely,
and she did not file a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal. T he notice of appeal was filed February 26, 2013, a date wit hin 15 days of its due date. The Texas Supreme Court has determined that a m otion for extension of time i s“necessarily implied” when the perfecting instrument is filed within fifteen days of
its due date. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because of the late filing and appellant’s failure to file a motion for extension of time. While an extension may be implied, appellant is still obligated to come forward with a reasonable explanation to support the late filing. See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Ctr

. Assocs.,
Ltd. , 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.). In accordance with our practice, we grant appellant 10 days from the date of
this order to file a proper motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal in compliance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure

. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3; 10.5(b). Appellee’s motion to dismiss shall remain pending. If appellant does not file a proper motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal containing a reasonable explanation for the late filing on or before April 26, 2013, the court
will consider dismissa l of the appeal for want of jur i s diction

.

PER CURIAM

2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Committee for Purchase from People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled

# AGENCY:

Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled.

# ACTION:

Proposed deletions from the Procurement List.

# SUMMARY:

The Committee is proposing to delete service(s) from the Procurement List that were furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.

# DATES:

*Comments must be received on or before:*                         May 1, 2022.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled, 1401 S Clark Street, Suite 715, Arlington, Virginia 22202-4149.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For further information or to submit comments contact: Michael R. Jurkowski, Telephone: (703) 785-6404, or email                         *CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This notice is published pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 8503(a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed actions.

## Deletions

The following service(s) are proposed for deletion from the Procurement List:

### Service(s)

*Service Type:*                         Janitorial/Custodial                    

*Mandatory for:*                         Bureau of Land Management, Salt Lake City Field Office and Warehouse, 2370 S Decker Lake Blvd., Salt Lake City, UT                    

*Designated Source of Supply:*                         Community Foundation for the Disabled, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT                    

*Contracting Activity:*                         BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGMENT                    

Michael R. Jurkowski,

Acting Director, Business Operations.

[FR Doc. 2022-06934 Filed 3-31-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
No. 11-9783.

#### Smith *v.*Florida.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.
# IMMC.EESC-2020-05837-AC.ENG.xhtml.EESC-2020-05837-00-00-AC-TRA-EN.docx

EN

TEN/737

TEN/737

Basic road freight and road passenger connectivity

  following the end of the transition period

Basic road freight and road passenger connectivity

following the end of the transition period

OPINION


  European Economic and Social Committee


  Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules ensuring basic road freight and road passenger connectivity following the end of the transition period mentioned in the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community

OPINION

European Economic and Social Committee

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules ensuring basic road freight and road passenger connectivity following the end of the transition period mentioned in the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community

[COM(2020) 826 final - 2020/0362 (COD)]

[COM(2020) 826 final - 2020/0362 (COD)]

Referrals

| Referrals | Council of the European Union, 11/12/2020


  European Parliament, 14/12/2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Legal basis | Articles 91(1) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union |
| Section responsible | Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and the Information Society |
| Adopted at plenary | 27/01/2021 |
| Plenary session No | 557 |
| Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions) | unanimous |

Referrals

Council of the European Union, 11/12/2020

Council of the European Union, 11/12/2020

European Parliament, 14/12/2020

European Parliament, 14/12/2020

Legal basis

Legal basis

Articles 91(1) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Articles 91(1) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Section responsible

Section responsible

Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and the Information Society

Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and the Information Society

Adopted at plenary

Adopted at plenary

27/01/2021

27/01/2021

Plenary session No

Plenary session No

557

557

Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions)

Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions)

unanimous

unanimous

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided unanimously, at its 557th plenary session of 27 and 28 January 2021 (meeting of 27 January), to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided unanimously, at its 557th plenary session of 27 and 28 January 2021 (meeting of 27 January), to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Christa SCHWENG

Christa SCHWENG

The president of the European Economic and Social Committee

The president of the European Economic and Social Committee

_____________
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Micro-Tech Identification
Systems,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeff Jenson, Chief Executive Officer of
 the small business issuer,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the small
business issuer.



/s/ Jeff Jenson
-----------------------
Jeff Jenson
Chief Executive Officer

August 14, 2007
No. 11-9966.

#### Thomas *v.*McCoy et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certio-rari denied.
Order entered January 7, 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00867 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF J .A., C.D.A., AND T.A ., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial Dis trict Court

Rockwall County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1 - 09 - 785 

### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s motion to extend time to file his amended brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief tendered to the Clerk of the Court January 3, 2020 filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit
31.2




CERTIFICATIONS






I,
Phillip Wong, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PacificNet Inc.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:




(a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;




(b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c)
disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal
control over financial reporting; and




5. The
small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business
issuer’s board of directors:




(a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and




(b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting.






Dated:  November
      21, 2008
            By:
      /s/ Phillip
      WongName:
      Phillip WongTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer
              (Principal
      Financial Officer)
#### Theresa SMITH, Appellant, v. CURATORS OF LINCOLN UNIVERSITY and Steven Meredith, Respondents.

WD 79091

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Filed: May 23, 2017

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 29, 2017

Jill Silverstein, David Sowers, Feme Wolf, and Joshua Pierson, St. Louis for appellant.

Kent Brown and Judith Willis, Jefferson city for respondent.

Before Division Three: Alok Ahuja, P. J., and Victor C. Howard and James E. Welsh, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Lincoln University terminated appellant Theresa Smith in September 2010 from her position as an administrative assistant in the Cooperative Extension of the College of Agriculture. Smith, who is African-American, fried suit against Lincoln and Steven Meredith, the Dean of the School of Agriculture, contending that her termination was racially motivated. Lincoln asserted a counterclaim, alleging that Smith had committed fraud by failing to accurately report when she utilized her paid leave. After a six-day trial, a jury returned verdicts in favor of Lincoln and Meredith on Smith’s employment discrimination claims, and in favor of Lincoln on its counterclaim. The circuit court entered judgment on the jury verdicts, and Smith appeals. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

RONNIE SANTANA

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 1167

[ August 8, 2019 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County ; Dan L. Vaughn

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 472011CF000416A

.

Ronnie Santana, Madison, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. Bettendorf,

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

T

AYLOR

, G ERBER and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 64 (Monday, April 4, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 19580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06978]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control


Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets 
Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons whose 
property and interests in property have been unblocked and have been 
removed from OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons 
List (SDN List).

DATES: See Supplementary Information section for effective date(s).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OFAC: Andrea Gacki, Director, tel.: 
202-622-2490; Associate Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202-622-
2420; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480; Assistant 
Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202-622-4855; or the Assistant 
Director for Sanctions Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 202-622-2490.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Availability

    The Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List and 
additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are available 
on OFAC's website (https://www.treasury.gov/ofac).

Notice of OFAC Actions

    On March 18, 2022, OFAC determined that the property and interests 
in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following person are 
unblocked and he has been removed from the SDN List under the relevant 
sanctions authorities listed below.

Individual

    1. ROSENTHAL HIDALGO, Yani Benjamin, 5 Calle, 24 Avenida S.O. 
#226, San Pedro Sula, Honduras; DOB 14 Jul 1965; POB Honduras; 
Passport B255530 (Honduras); National ID No. 0501196506001 
(Honduras); RTN 05011965060013 (Honduras) (individual) [SDNTK].

    Dated: March 18, 2022.
Gregory T. Gatjanis,
Associate Director, Office of Global Targeting, Office of Foreign 
Assets Control, U.S. Department of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2022-06978 Filed 4-1-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Peter Limeri, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of PRG-Schultz International, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors:     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.         August 13, 2007 By: /s/ Peter Limeri             Peter Limeri      *Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer*      *(Principal Financial Officer)*
32
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 8, 2014

NO. 03-13-00080-CV

Appellants, Central Austin Apartments, LLC; UP-32nd Street, LLC; and UP-32nd Street 

Hospitality, LLC// Cross-Appellants, East Avenue Property Owners’ Association, Inc. and 

UP Austin Holdings, LP and UP Austin Land Holdings, LP

v.

Appellees, UP Austin Holdings, LP; UP Austin Land Holdings, LP; and East Avenue 

Property Owners’ Association, Inc.// Cross-Appellees, Central Austin Apartments, LLC; 

UP-32nd Street, LLC; and UP-32nd Street Hospitality, LLC

APPEAL FROM 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND ROSE

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND RENDERED IN PART; REVERSED AND 

REMANDED IN PART -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

This is an appeal from the trial court judgment signed on November 30, 2012. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the trial 

court’s judgment. 

We affirm the portion of the trial court’s judgment invalidating the December 

2011 special assessment by East Avenue Property Owners’ Association, Inc. (the 

POA) and the portion denying the POA’s counterclaims against UP Austin 

Holdings, LP and UP Austin Land Holdings, LP (collectively, UP Austin) for 

payment of the special assessment and attorney’s fees.

We reverse the trial court’s judgment to the extent it invalidates the October 25, 

2011 and August 17, 2012 amendments to the Amended and Restated Declaration 
of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions based on a finding of minority 

oppression and vacate the permanent injunction against UP-32nd Street, LLC; we 

render judgment that UP Austin take nothing on its minority-oppression claim. 

We further reverse the trial court’s judgment denying the unjust-enrichment 

claims of UP-32nd Street LLC, Central Austin Apartments, LLC, and UP-32nd

Street Hospitality, LLC (collectively, the Owners) and render judgment that the 

POA shall refund the amounts the Owners paid pursuant to the invalid December 

2011 assessment as follows: $515,792 to UP-32nd Street, LLC; $291,972 to 

Central Austin Apartments, LLC; and $279,701 to UP-32nd Street Hospitality,

LLC, plus interest from the date of this judgment. 

We further reverse the portion of the trial court’s judgment concerning (1) UP 

Austin’s request for appointment of a receiver under Tex. Bus. Orgs. Code

§ 11.404, (2) UP Austin’s and the Owners’ claims for attorney’s fees, and (3) the 

award of conditional post-judgment and appellate attorney’s fees to UP Austin; 

we remand those claims and issues to the trial court for further proceedings not 

inconsistent with this Court’s opinion.

Each party shall pay the costs of the appeal incurred by that party, both in this Court and the 

court below.