alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE YORK GROUP, INC. 1999 THIRD QUARTER REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                        1,653
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                38,881
<ALLOWANCES>                                  4,022
<INVENTORY>                                  35,108
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             78,756
<PP&E>                                       94,851
<DEPRECIATION>                               32,745
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              217,626
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        49,494
<BONDS>                                      62,103
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                         89
<OTHER-SE>                                   89,805
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                217,626
<SALES>                                     150,154
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            150,154
<CGS>                                       101,721
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               101,721
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            4,293
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               9,791
<INCOME-TAX>                                  4,064
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           5,727
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                  5,727
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.63


</TABLE>
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:**

___ 2013

_______ - NM -

____ 224

______ - AD **Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significan t? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
H. J. Res. 131

One Hundred Fifth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-eight

Joint Resolution

Waiving certain enrollment requirements for the remainder of the One Hundred

Fifth Congress with respect to any bill or joint resolution making general or

continuing appropriations for fiscal year 1999.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That the provisions

of sections 106 and 107 of title 1, United States Code, are waived

for the remainder of the One Hundred Fifth Congress with respect

to the printing (on parchment or otherwise) of the enrollment of

any bill or joint resolution making general appropriations or

continuing appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30,

1999. The enrollment of any such bill or joint resolution shall

be in such form as the Committee on House Oversight of the

House of Representatives certifies to be a true enrollment.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from  
consolidated financial statements of Ceramics Process Systems Corporation  
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q for period 
ending April 3, 1999.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               Apr-03-1999
<CASH>                                       1,412,765
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  702,477
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    318,035
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,462,941
<PP&E>                                         781,370
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,050,956
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,253,083
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          599,847
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    12,285,969
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,253,083
<SALES>                                      1,245,414
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,245,414
<CGS>                                          833,551
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,094,207
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                161,307
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,842
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            151,465
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   151,465
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 32 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  Union Calendar No. 12
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 32

                          [Report No. 105-16]

  To consent to certain amendments enacted by the Legislature of the 
      State of Hawaii to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 21, 1997

   Mr. Abercrombie (for himself and Mr. Faleomavaega) introduced the 
  following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                               Resources

                             March 11, 1997

                    Additional sponsor: Mr. Gallegly

                             March 11, 1997

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  To consent to certain amendments enacted by the Legislature of the 
      State of Hawaii to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, as required by section 4 
of the Act entitled ``An Act to provide for the admission of the State 
of Hawaii into the Union'', approved March 18, 1959 (73 Stat. 4), the 
United States consents to the following amendments to the Hawaiian 
Homes Commission Act, 1920, adopted by the State of Hawaii in the 
manner required for State legislation:
            (1) Act 339 of the Session Laws of Hawaii, 1993.
            (2) Act 37 of the Session Laws of Hawaii, 1994.
                                     

                                                  Union Calendar No. 12

105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 32

                          [Report No. 105-16]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To consent to certain amendments enacted by the Legislature of the 
      State of Hawaii to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 11, 1997

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 103

JOINT RESOLUTION

Waiving certain enrollment requirements with redred Fifth Congress. spect to certain specified bills of the One Hun-
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 103

JOINT RESOLUTION

Waiving certain enrollment requirements with respect to

certain specified bills of the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the provisions of sections 106 and 107 of title 1,

4 United States Code, are waived for the balance of the first
2

•HJ 103 EH

1 session of the One Hundred Fifth Congress with respect

2 to the printing (on parchment or otherwise) of the enroll3 ment of any bill or joint resolution making general appro4 priations for the fiscal year ending on September 30,

5 1998, or continuing appropriations for the fiscal year end6 ing on September 30, 1998. The enrollment of any such

7 bill or joint resolution shall be in such form as the Com8 mittee on House Oversight of the House of Representa9 tives certifies to be a true enrollment.

Passed the House of Representatives November 10

(legislative day, November 9), 1997.

Attest:

Clerk.
No. 11-10335.

#### Turner *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         431,818
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,166,461
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,673,955
<INVENTORY>                                  2,820,596
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,208,646
<PP&E>                                       2,453,383
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,107,285
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,319,788
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,514,721
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,238,784
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,034,992)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,319,788
<SALES>                                      8,112,099
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,112,099
<CGS>                                        2,996,564
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,996,564
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,374,163
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               186,037
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50,220
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                664,014
<INCOME-TAX>                                   254,049
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            409,965
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   409,965
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
        

</TABLE>
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 343

Expressing the opposition of Congress to any deployment of United States

ground forces in Kosovo, a province in southern Serbia, for peacemaking

or peacekeeping purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 8, 1998

Mrs. FOWLER (for herself, Mr. SPENCE, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. HEFLEY, Mr. GOODLING,

Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. DELAY, Mr. LINDER, Mr. RILEY, Mr.

MCKEON, Mr. LEWIS of California, Mr. SOLOMON, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr.

COBURN, Mr. BOB SCHAFFER of Colorado, Mr. MCINTOSH, Mr. GRAHAM,

Mr. JENKINS, Mr. NEUMANN, Mr. SUNUNU, Mr. OXLEY, Mr. MCCOLLUM, Mr. HOBSON, Mr. BEREUTER, Mr. TAUZIN, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr.

TRAFICANT, Mr. REDMOND, Mrs. CUBIN, Ms. DUNN, Mr. HERGER, Mr.

MCINNIS, Mr. LARGENT, Mr. FOLEY, Mr. SAXTON, Mr. JONES, Mr.

MCCRERY, Mr. BAKER, Mr. HAYWORTH, Mr. COLLINS, Mr. BOEHNER,

Mr. NETHERCUTT, Mr. DEAL of Georgia, Mr. WICKER, and Mr.

STEARNS) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the opposition of Congress to any deployment

of United States ground forces in Kosovo, a province

in southern Serbia, for peacemaking or peacekeeping

purposes.

Whereas Kosovo, unlike Bosnia, is a province of the sovereign

nation of Serbia;
2

HCON 343 IH

Whereas there is no vital United States national security interest at stake in the current violence taking place in

Kosovo;

Whereas an Act of Congress is necessary for the introduction

of the Armed Forces of the United States into hostilities

or situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is

clearly indicated by the circumstances, when such action

is not required for the defense of the United States, its

Armed Forces, or its nationals;

Whereas President Clinton is contemplating ordering such a

deployment to Kosovo in the near future in conjunction

with NATO;

Whereas the Secretary of Defense, William Cohen, opposes

the deployment of ground forces in Kosovo, as reflected

in his testimony before Congress on October 6, 1998;

Whereas the lessons of United States military involvement in

Bosnia clearly argue that the costs and duration of any

such deployment for peacekeeping purposes will be much

heavier and much longer than initially foreseen; and

Whereas the substantial drain on military readiness of a deployment in Kosovo would be inconsistent with the need,

recently acknowledged by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, to reverse the trends which are decimating the ability of the

Armed Forces of the United States to carry out the basic

National Military Strategy of the United States: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress hereby expresses its opposition

3 to any deployment of United States ground forces into the
3

HCON 343 IH

1 Serbian province of Kosovo for peacemaking or peacekeep2 ing purposes.

3 SEC. 2. The Clerk of the House shall transmit a copy

4 of this concurrent resolution to the President.

Æ
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

Press Release

SOURCE: Enron and Dynegy

Enron and Dynegy Announce Settlement of Merger-Related Litigation

Agreement Includes Resolution of Outstanding Commercial Matters Relating to
Northern Natural Gas

HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Aug. 15, 2002--Enron Corp. (ENRNQ) and Dynegy Inc.
(NYSE:DYN - News) today announced that they have reached a settlement of
litigation arising from the failure of the November 2001 merger of the two
companies. The settlement agreement has been approved by the boards of both
companies.

Under the terms of the agreement, Dynegy will pay Enron $25 million to settle
the lawsuit Enron had filed alleging breach of contract for wrongful termination
of the merger. Enron has agreed to release Dynegy from any and all claims
relating to the terminated merger and to dismiss such litigation.

In addition, Dynegy has agreed not to pursue any claims for working capital
adjustments relating to its acquisition of Northern Natural Gas Company (NNG)
from Enron last February. This will result in the release of funds to Enron that
had been escrowed in connection with the sale of NNG, pending a review of
working capital as of the closing date. The settlement amount and the release of
escrowed funds are subject to bankruptcy court approval.

Enron has agreed to continue providing transition services to NNG once
MidAmerican Energy Holdings Company's purchase of the pipeline from Dynegy is
completed later this month. Enron has been providing services on a transition
basis under an agreement established between the two companies when Dynegy
acquired NNG. Enron has agreed to allow the assignment of that agreement, which
runs until Jan. 31, 2003, to MidAmerican Energy.

"We are pleased to have reached a settlement that enables both companies to move
forward without the shadow of protracted litigation. This settlement maximizes
value for our creditors, which is Enron's top priority at this time," said Enron
Interim CEO Stephen F. Cooper. "Through the transition services agreement, we
will continue to work with Dynegy and MidAmerican Energy to ensure that the NNG
transition goes smoothly and that NNG's customers continue to receive safe and
reliable service."

Dan Dienstbier, interim CEO of Dynegy Inc., said, "This settlement resolves a
matter that has been weighing on our company and our stakeholders, and we are
pleased to have done so on terms that are reasonable for Dynegy. The transfer of
the transition services agreement is an important step in the timely completion
of our sale of NNG to MidAmerican Energy."

Enron has significant natural gas and electricity assets in North and South
America. Enron's Internet address is www.enron.com.


<PAGE>


Dynegy Inc. is a global energy merchant. Through its owned and contractually
controlled network of physical assets and its marketing, logistics and risk
management capabilities, Dynegy provides solutions to customers in North
America, the United Kingdom and continental Europe. The company's website is
www.dynegy.com.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Danny Ray CAUDILL, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-10125 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 20, 2018

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Danny Ray Caudill, Pro Se

Before REAVLEY, CLEMENT, and HO, Circuit Judges.

*455PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Danny Ray Caudill has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cau-dill has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Helaine M. Kaplan,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respectof the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the COMM 2014-CCRE21Mortgage Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

Midland LoanServices, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNRPartners, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asTrustee and Certificate Administrator, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association,as Custodian, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, KeyBankNational Association, as Primary Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Primary Servicer for the Loews Miami Beach Hotel Mortgage Loan,Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer for the Loews Miami BeachHotel Mortgage Loan, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee for theLoews Miami Beach Hotel Mortgage Loan, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association,as Certificate Administrator for the Loews Miami Beach Hotel Mortgage Loan,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian for the Loews Miami BeachHotel Mortgage Loan, Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor for the LoewsMiami Beach Hotel Mortgage Loan, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services,Inc., as Servicing Function Participant for the Loews Miami Beach HotelMortgage Loan, and National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participantfor the Loews Miami Beach Hotel Mortgage Loan.

 

 

 

Dated: October 30,2019

 

 

/s/ Helaine M. Kaplan

 

 

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
No. 12-5399.

#### Johnson *v.*Pennsylvania.

Super. Ct. Pa. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin*v. *District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U. S. 1 (1992) *(per curiam).*