alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7693

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM W. KINKELLA, a/k/a Funk,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-02-14; CA-02-159)

Submitted: March 10, 2004 Decided: March 26, 2004

 

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William W. Kinkella, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. McWilliams, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

William W. Kinkella appeals the district court’s denial

of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be

taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v.

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000), Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683

(4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and

conclude that Kinkella has not satisfied either standard.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Kenneth Stephen PRYSOCK, Petitioner

No. 285 WAL 2016

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

January 8, 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 338

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the people of Taiwan deserve

to be represented in international institutions.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 8, 1998

Mr. CAMPBELL submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the people of

Taiwan deserve to be represented in international institutions.

Whereas the people of Taiwan are a democracy and possess

a free economy with the 19th largest gross domestic

product in the world;

Whereas the people of Taiwan have the 14th largest trade

economy in the world and the 7th largest amount of foreign investment in the world and hold one of the largest

amounts of foreign exchange reserves in the world;

Whereas the people of Taiwan are committed to the economic

and political norms of the international community;

Whereas the denial of representation to the people of Taiwan

from international institutions weakens the ability of
2

•HCON 338 IH

those institutions to speak for all the people of our world

and is unfair to the people of Taiwan; and

Whereas such representation need not affect the international

legal status of the people of Taiwan or of China: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that it

3 should be United States policy to support the representa4 tion of the people of Taiwan in international institutions.

Æ
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 29, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18017-18018]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06585]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies

[[Page 18018]]

owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed 
below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than April 28, 2022.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (Prabal Chakrabarti, Senior Vice 
President) 600 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02210-2204. 
Comments can also be sent electronically to 
[email protected]:
    1. 1854 Bancorp, Cambridge, Massachusetts; to acquire Patriot 
Community Bank, Woburn, Massachusetts.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 24, 
2022.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-06585 Filed 3-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
No. 12-5419.

#### Jones *v.*Florida.

Sup. Ct. Fla. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 101 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 101

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1998, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 7, 1997

  Mr. Livingston introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1998, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That section 106(3) of Public 
Law 105-46 is further amended by striking ``November 7, 1997'' and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``November 9, 1997'', and each provision 
amended by sections 122 and 123 of such public law shall be applied as 
if ``November 9, 1997'' was substituted for ``October 23, 1997''.
                                 <all>
```
IA

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 115

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to permit

the Congress to relinquish claims of the United States to the portion

of the State of Minnesota that lies north of the 49th parallel.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 18, 1998

Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota introduced the following joint resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to permit the Congress to relinquish claims of

the United States to the portion of the State of Minnesota that lies north of the 49th parallel.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several
2

•HJ 115 IH

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission

2 for ratification:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE —

4 ‘‘Nothing in this Constitution limits any act of the

5 Congress to relinquish claims of the United States to the

6 portion of the State of Minnesota that lies north of the

7 49th parallel, if before such relinquishment the registered

8 voters who reside in such portion as of the date of the

9 proposal of this amendment vote, under procedures estab10 lished by the Congress, by at least a two-thirds majority,

11 in favor of the full incorporation of such portion into Can12 ada, and if contemporaneous with such relinquishment

13 such portion is so incorporated and the residents of such

14 portion as of the date of the proposal of this amendment

15 are granted permanent dual citizenship of the United

16 States and Canada.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

               STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      The undersigned, Andrew Gordon, is the President, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of Coffee Holding Co., Inc. (the "Company").

      This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
July 31, 2005 (the "Report").

      By execution of this statement, I certify that:

      A)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
            78o(d)) and

      B)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
            Report.

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that
this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Coffee Holding Co., Inc. and will be retained by Coffee Holding Co.,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

September 14, 2005                     /s/ Andrew Gordon
----------------------------           ---------------------------------
Dated                                  Andrew Gordon
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. James Carroll EASON, Jr., also known as Jimbo, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-10490 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 20, 2018

James Carroll Eason, Jr., Pro Se

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and DENNIS and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

James Carroll Eason, Jr., federal prisoner # 44258-177, appeals the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion to reduce his 210-month sentence for conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance. Eason sought a modification of his sentence based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines.

Eason argues that the district court erred in concluding that he was not entitled to a sentence reduction because it did not properly consider that his original guidelines range was calculated using an improperly inflated drug quantity. We review for abuse of discretion a district court’s decision whether to reduce a sentence pursuant to § 3582(c)(2). *United States v. Evans,*587 F.3d 667, 672 (5th Cir. 2009).

An offense level of 42 and criminal history category of V yielded an original guidelines range of 360 to 480 months in prison. A two-level reduction pursuant to Amendment 782 would have resulted in an offense level of 40. With a criminal history category of V, Eason’s new guidelines range of imprisonment would have remained 360 to 480 months in prison. *See*21 U.S.C. §§ 846 & 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B); U.S.S.G. Ch. 5, Pt. A. Because Eason’s sentence was based on *460a sentencing range that was not subsequently lowered by Amendment 782, he is not eligible for a reduced sentence under § 3582(c)(2). *See*§ 3582(c); § 1B1.10(a)(2) *&*cmt. (n.1(A)); *United States v. Doublin,*572 F.3d 235, 237 (5th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Confidential Material

RemovedConfidential Material

Removed
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
consolidated  balance  sheet  and  the  consolidated   statement  of  operations
(unaudited).

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0000815098
<NAME>                        Trudy Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                            1
<CURRENCY>                             USD
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                             35,553
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     206,219    <F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                     1,603,744
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                2,058,772
<PP&E>                                       135,905 <F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  2,854,392
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,013,908
<BONDS>                           742,986
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                           33,123
<OTHER-SE>                      1,064,375
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    2,854,375
<SALES>                         3,004,687
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                3,004,687
<CGS>                           1,436,846
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   3,248,240
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   55,612
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 86,913
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (386,078)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (386,078)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                     (386,078)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    (.001166)
<EPS-DILUTED>                    (.001166)
        
<FN>
<F1> The values for Receivables and PP&E represent net amounts.
</FN>

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6400 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6400

  To revise the boundaries of certain John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 
                 Resources System units in New Jersey.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 29, 2016

 Mr. Pallone introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To revise the boundaries of certain John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 
                 Resources System units in New Jersey.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES 
              SYSTEM MAP.

    (a) In General.--The map subtitled ``Seidler Beach Unit NJ-02, 
Cliffwood Beach Unit NJ-03P, Conaskonk Point Unit NJ-04'', dated August 
1, 2014, that is included in the set of maps entitled ``Coastal Barrier 
Resources System'' referred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier 
Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)) and relating to certain John H. 
Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System units in New Jersey, is hereby 
replaced by another map subtitled ``Seidler Beach Unit NJ-02/NJ-02P, 
Cliffwood Beach Unit NJ-03P, Conaskonk Point Unit NJ-04, Sayreville 
Unit NJ-15P, Matawan Point Unit NJ-16P'' and dated October 7, 2016.
    (b) Availability.--The Secretary of the Interior shall keep the 
replacement map referred to in subsection (a) on file and available for 
inspection in accordance with section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier 
Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).
                                 <all>
```
#### Keith Aaron VANN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Rick Perkins, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-7642

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 22, 2018

Decided: February 27, 2018

Keith Aaron Vann, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murder Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Keith Aaron Vann appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant Defendants summary judgment on Vann’s negligence claim, brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b)(1) (2012), and the district court’s order denying Vann’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. *See Vann v. United States,*No. 1:17-cv-01149-HMH (D.S.C. Oct. 31, 2017 & Nov. 30, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
No. 11-9943.

#### Spano *v.*Schulson et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the “Quarterly Report”) of
      Amnutria Dairy Inc. (the “Registrant”) for the fiscal quarter ended September
      30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, I, Yang Yong Shan, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
      of
      the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Registrant.




By: 
              /s/  Yang Yong ShanYang
                Yong Shan
              Chairman,
                Chief Executive Officer and President
              (Principal
                Executive Officer)
              Dated
                this19thday
                of November, 2007
# EUR-Lex - 32003R1414 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32003R1414

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1414/2003 of 7 August 2003 suspending Regulation (EC) No 936/2003 opening an invitation to tender for the refund on barley exports to certain third countries **

*
Official Journal L 201 , 08/08/2003 P. 0016 - 0016 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1414/2003

of 7 August 2003

suspending Regulation (EC) No 936/2003 opening an invitation to tender for the refund on barley exports to certain third countries

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 of 30 June 1992 on the common organisation of the markets in cereals(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1104/2003(2), and in particular Article 5 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1501/95(3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1324/2002(4), lays down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 covering the grant of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance in the sector.

(2) Regulation (EC) No 936/2003(5) opens an invitation to tender for the refund on barley exports to certain third countries.

(3) For economic reasons, that invitation to tender should be suspended.

(4) The Management Committee for Cereals has not delivered an opinion within the period set by its chairman,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The tendering procedure provided for in Regulation (EC) No 936/2003 is hereby suspended.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 August 2003.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 181, 1.7.1992, p. 21.

(2) OJ L 158, 27.6.2003, p. 1.

(3) OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7.

(4) OJ L 194, 23.7.2002, p. 26.

(5) OJ L 133, 29.5.2003, p. 48.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.5

                       Consent of Independent Accountants

     We hereby consent to the use in this Amendment No. 2 to Registration
Statement on Form S-4 of our reports dated May 2, 2002, except as to Notes 20
and 21 to the consolidated financial statements, which are as of November 18,
2002, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule of Hanover Compression Limited Partnership, which appear in such
Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading
"Experts" in such Registration Statement.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas
November 25, 2002
No. 11-1413.

#### Corbett *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.