alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Powerhouse  Technologies  Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Jay Elliot, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ Jay Elliot
------------------------------
Jay Elliot
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Date:  December 22, 2004


                                      -11-
<PAGE>


                                                               EXHIBIT 21.1


                      SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



<TABLE>
<S>                                                               <C>
Plumtree Software GmbH........................................... Switzerland
Plumtree Software PTE Limited.................................... Singapore
Plumtree Software PTY Limited.................................... Australia
Plumtree Software Limited........................................ Hong Kong
Plumtree Software Limited........................................ Korea
Plumtree Portal Software Limited................................. United Kingdom
Plumtree Software AB............................................. Sweden
Plumtree Software GmbH........................................... Germany
Plumtree Software EURL........................................... France
Plumtree Software BV............................................. Netherlands
Plumtree Software KK............................................. Japan
</TABLE>
No. 11-9056.

#### Ferguson *v.*Avelo Mortgage, LLC.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CPS Technologies Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three month and six month periods ended June 27, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Grant C. Bennett, President and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:	August 11, 2009
/s/	Grant C. Bennett
Grant C. Bennett
President and Treasurer
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.3

                CONSENT OF NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.

            We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this
Registration Statement of Harken Energy Corporation (the "Company") and to the
references to this firm for the Company's estimated domestic proved reserves
contained in this Registration Statement.

                                           NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.


Houston, Texas
September 11, 2002
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-6546

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

AHMED SALA ALI BURALE, a/k/a Ahmed Salah Ali, Ahmed Hindi, Ahmed Salah 

Ali Burle,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Senior District Judge. (2:11-cr-00034-RBS-DEM-13)

Submitted: September 12, 2024 Decided: September 16, 2024

Before THACKER and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ahmed Sala Ali Burale, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6546 Doc: 7 Filed: 09/16/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Ahmed Sala Ali Burale appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to Part B, Subpart 1, of 

Amendment 821 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We conclude that the district court 

adequately explained its reasons for denying Burale’s motion and that the court did not 

abuse its discretion in finding that Burale was ineligible for relief. See United States v. 

Martin, 916 F.3d 389, 395 (4th Cir. 2019) (stating standards). Accordingly, we affirm the 

district court’s judgment. United States v. Burale, No. 2:11-cr-00034-RBS-DEM-13 

(E.D. Va. May 10, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6546 Doc: 7 Filed: 09/16/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.4

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Current Report of U.S. Unwired Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 8-K dated August 16, 2002 (the "Report"), I, Jerry E. Vaughn, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.



/s/ Jerry E. Vaughn
------------------------
Jerry E. Vaughn
Chief Financial Officer
August 16, 2002
EXHIBIT 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF DYNEGY HOLDINGS INC.

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2002



|   |  | SUBSIDIARY                        |  | STATE OR JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
|-- |  | --------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|1. |  | NNGC Holding Company, Inc.        |  | Delaware                              
|2. |  | CoGen Lyondell, Inc.              |  | Texas                                 
|3. |  | Dynegy Midwest Generation, Inc.   |  | Illinois                              
|4. |  | Dynegy Catlin Member, Inc.        |  | Delaware                              
|5. |  | Dynegy Northeast Generation, Inc. |  | Delaware                              
|6. |  | DMG Merchant Power                |  | Texas                                 
|7. |  | Dynegy Power Marketing, Inc.      |  | Texas                                 
|8. |  | Dynegy Finance Limited            |  | Delaware                              
|9. |  | Dynegy Marketing & Trade          |  | Colorado
#### COM. v. MICHUA-GARFIAS, C.

1731 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/05/2017

CP-01-CR-0000377-2016 (Adams)

Affirmed
**EXHIBIT ITEM 32.2**

 

SECTION 906CERTIFICATION

 

The certification set forth below is beingsubmitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose ofcomplying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode.

 

November 12,2009

 

BruceN. Warner, the Chief Financial Officer of Northern California Bancorp, Inc.certifies:

 

c.               thatthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2009 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

d.              thatinformation contained in this Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Northern California Bancorp, Inc.

 

 
|   | /s/ Bruce N. Warner          |
|--------|------------------------------|
|   | Bruce N. Warner              |
|   | Chief Financial Officer and  |
|   | Principal Accounting Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                          <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,387                  34,038
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       167,685                 157,685
<OTHER-SE>                                   (219,072)               (191,723)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,174                  11,974
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (25,174)                (11,974)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (25,174)                (11,974)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (25,174)                (11,974)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.065)                  (.069)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.065)                  (.069)





</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2




                                   CERTIFICATION


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, the  undersigned certifies that (1)
this Quarterly  Report of BF  Enterprises, Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities  and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (this  "Report"),  fully  complies with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended,  and (2) the  information  contained in this Report fairly
presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition of the Company
as of June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001 and its results of operations for the
three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2002.



                                              /s/ S. Douglas Post
                                              ---------------------------
                                              S. Douglas Post
                                              Vice President, Treasurer and
                                              Chief Financial Officer


Date: August 13, 2002
#### Charles G. KINNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Philip GUTIERREZ, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-56750

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017*

Filed December 28, 2017

*416Charles G. Kinney, Pro Se

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Kinney’s request *416for oral argument, set forth in the opening brief, is denied.

MEMORANDUM **

Charles G. Kinney appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his action seeking a declaratory judgment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal on the basis of judicial immunity. *Romano v. Bible,*169 F.3d 1182, 1186 (9th Cir. 1999). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Kinney’s claims against Judge Gutierrez on the basis of judicial immunity. *See Duvall v. County of Kitsap,*260 F.3d 1124, 1133 (9th Cir. 2001) (describing factors relevant to whether an act is judicial in nature and subject to judicial immunity). Contrary to Kinney’s contention, Judge Gutierrez was not acting in a ministerial or administrative capacity when he issued the remand orders.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the complaint without leave to amend because amendment would be futile. *Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.,*656 F.3d 1034, 1041 (9th Cir. 2011) (setting forth standard of review and explaining that dismissal without leave to amend, is proper when amendment would be futile).

We reject as unsupported by the record Kinney’s contention that the district judge was biased.

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3,
1

Russo, Gary

Subject: FW: Question about Iowa Antidegradation Reviews

From: Bryant, Larry [DNR] [mailto:Larry.Bryant@dnr.iowa.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 11:36 AM 

To: Matt Hynson 

Subject: RE: Question about Iowa Antidegradation Reviews 

Matt,

I think those numbers may have been high.  Our records from this are far from perfect because our antideg program is

split between construction permitting and NPDES, but in my estimation we are averaging around 50 final submittals per

year (excluding requests for draft reviews, informational requests, etc.)

LARRY BRYANT, P.E. Environmental Engineer Senior

Iowa Department of Natural Resources 

P 515.281.6759 | F 515.281.8895 |Larry.Bryant@dnr.iowa.gov

502 East 9th Street | Des Moines, IA  50319‐0034

WWW.IOWADNR.GOV

Leading Iowans in Caring for Our Natural Resources.

 

From: Matt Hynson [mailto:Matt_Hynson@abtassoc.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 3:00 PM 

To: Bryant, Larry [DNR] 

Subject: Question about Iowa Antidegradation Reviews 

Mr. Bryant,

I’m working for a consulting firm that is doing an analysis of water quality standards regulations for EPA. This Iowa DNR

publication from 2008 suggests that Iowa was getting approximately 104 to 164 antidegradation review requests per

year.  Do you have any updates on that number?  

http://www.iowadnr.gov/portals/idnr/uploads/water/antidegradation/antideg_fiscal.pdf

Thanks!

‐Matt

Matt Hynson | Research Assistant | Abt Associates

O: 301‐347‐5603 | Matt_Hynson@abtassoc.com | www.abtassociates.com
EXHIBIT 31.2

         CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER SECTION 302 OF
                             THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, William J. Bush, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of International
Microcomputer Software, Inc;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered by this
quarterly report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
periods in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c. Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date.

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a. a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.


DATE: FEBRUARY 11, 2003


BY:  /S/ WILLIAM J. BUSH
William J. Bush
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)


                                       32
**Exhibit 23.1**

** **

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in RegistrationStatement (No. 333-215056) on Form S-8 of Polar Power, Inc. of our report dated March 10, 2017 relating to our audit of thefinancial statements of Polar Power, Inc., which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Polar Power, Inc. for the year endedDecember 31, 2016.

 

/s/ WEINBERG & COMPANY P.A.

 

Los Angeles, California

March 10, 2017
No. 11-1460.

#### Awand et vir *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]



# United States Court of Appeals

**For the First Circuit**

No. 00-1341 UNITED STATES, Appellee,
v. JESSICA ORTIZ, a/k/a MARTA, Defendant, Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Nathaniel M. Gorton, U.S. District Judge ]
Before Torruella, Chief Judge , Selya and Stahl, Circuit Judges .
George F. Gormleyand George F. Gormley, P.C. on brief for appellant. Donald K. Stern , United States Attorney, and Michael D. Ricciuti , Assistant U.S. Attorney, on brief for appellee.
May 3, 2000Per Curiam . Title 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) requires

that any detention order issued under section 3142(e) “shall (1) include written findings of fact and a written statement of the reasons for the detention . . . .” See also United States v. Moss , 887 F.2d 333, 337-38 (1 st Cir. 1989) (per curiam) (written detention order which simply stated that the court had made a “full review” of the evidence and that defenda nt had failed to rebut the presumption was insufficient under section 3142(i)). The district judge’s written order of detention in this case provides no written statement of the reasons for the detention decision. In such circumstances, meaningful appellate review is impossible, especially where the magistrate judge ordered appellant released and did provide a written statement of the reasons for that decision.

Therefore, we remand the matter with directions to the district judge to provide a written statement, by May 23, 2000, of the reasons for his decision to detain the appellant.Remanded.
H. Con. Res. 75 Agreed to June 15, 1998

One Hundred Fifth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-eight

Concurrent Resolution

Whereas a disturbing number of law-abiding citizens believe, they

are prisoners in their own homes because of increasing violence

in our society;

Whereas law-abiding citizens have the right to be fearful knowing

that violent offenders only serve on average 48 percent of the

sentence they received;

Whereas more, than two-thirds of the persons under correctional

supervision are currently on parole and not incarcerated;

Whereas one in three offenders admitted to State prisons were

on probation or parole violators;

Whereas the Federal Government eliminated parole in 1984 and

prisoners convicted of Federal crimes now serve at least 85

percent of their sentences;

Whereas under current Federal law, States are eligible for prison

construction funds if they keep felons in prison for at least 85

percent of their sentence;

Whereas in 1996, at least 25 States, among them Arizona,

California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa,

Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri,

New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon,

Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, and

Washington, have laws that meet the 85 percent of sentence

served requirements set forth in the 1994 crime bill; and

Whereas the National Association of Police Organizations, the International Chiefs of Police, the Fraternal Order of Police, the

National Association of Chiefs of Police, the National District

Attorney’s Association, and the Safe Streets Coalition support

the concept of an 85 percent minimum length of service for

violent criminals: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

(1) Congress commends Arizona, California, Connecticut,

Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana,

Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, New York, North

Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South

Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, and Washington for their

existing efforts with respect to prison time served by criminal

offenders;

(2) Congress encourages all remaining States to adopt as

quickly as possible legislation to increase the time served by

violent felons; and
H. Con. Res. 75—2

(3) with respect to Federal crimes, Congress reemphasizes

its support for the requirement that individuals who commit

violent crimes should serve at least 85 percent of their sentence.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.