alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jason Wayne CHILDS, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-10430 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed January 12, 2018

Leigha Amy Simonton, James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Jason Wayne Childs, Pro Se

Before PRADO, ELROD, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jason Wayne Childs, federal prisoner # 39670-177, has moved for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction based on Amendment 801 to the Sentencing Guidelines. By seeking leave to proceed IFP, Childs is challenging the district court’s certification that his appeal is not taken in good faith because it is frivolous. *See Baugh v. Taylor,*117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997).

*285Amendment 801 is not listed in U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(d), p.s. *See*U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual, Supp. to App. C, Amendment 801, pp. 139-46 (2016); § 1B1.10(d), p.s. Accordingly, the district court was not authorized to reduce Childs’s sentence pursuant to this amendment, and it did not abuse its discretion in denying Childs’s § 3582(c)(2) motion. *See*§ 1B1.10(a)(2)(A), comment. (n.1(A)), p.s.; *Dillon v. United States,*560 U.S. 817, 826, 130 S.Ct. 2683, 177 L.Ed.2d 271 (2010); *United States v. Henderson,*636 F.3d 713, 717 (5th Cir. 2011).

This appeal does not present a nonfrivolous issue, and Childs has not brought it in good faith. *See Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). The motion for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. *See Baugh,*117 F.3d at 202 n.24; 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.'
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU LY 19, 2019

NO. 03

- 18

- 00706

- CV

Aleana Sullivan, Appellant

v.

Cody Sullivan, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 395TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY
BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND SMITH
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the final order signed by the tr i a l court on October 5, 2018 . Having

reviewed the record , the Court holds that Aleana Sullivan has not prosecuted her appeal and did

not comply with a notice from the C lerk of this C ourt

. Therefore, the Court dismisse s the appeal

f or want of prosecution. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on

of costs is made.
EXHIBIT 13.1



CERTIFICATION



In connection with the annual report
of Baozun Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015, as amended by this Amendment No.
1 on Form 20-F/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Vincent
Wenbin Qiu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:







(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:
    June 1, 2016 | By:    | /s/
    Vincent Wenbin Qiu 
|---------------------- | ------ | ---------------------------
|                       | Name:  | Vincent
    Wenbin Qiu     
|                       | Title: | Chief
    Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                         24,711     
<SECURITIES>                                   0          
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,244,166  
<ALLOWANCES>                                   252,100    
<INVENTORY>                                    179,760    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,113,536  
<PP&E>                                         4,652,232  
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,551,411  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9,075,380  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,172,955  
<BONDS>                                        1,368,872  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          1,300,000  
<PREFERRED>                                    0          
<COMMON>                                       1,043      
<OTHER-SE>                                     332,510    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9,075,380  
<SALES>                                        6,896,735  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,896,735  
<CGS>                                          5,953,852  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8,457,133  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0          
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               78,097     
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             501,196    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,139,691)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0          
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,139,691)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0          
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0          
<CHANGES>                                      0          
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,139,691)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.22)      
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.22)      
                                               


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION                                                       Exhibit 31.2
Chief Financial Officer

I, Stephen K. Radusch, Chief Financial Officer certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Chadmoore  Wireless
     Group, Inc;

2.   Based on my knowledge,  the report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material  fact or omit to state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the report;

3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
     information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects
     the financial  conditions,  the results of its operations and cash flows of
     the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in the report;

4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible
     for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as
     defined in Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14 and 15d-14) for the  registrant  and
     have:

     a.   Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
          consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to them by  others  within
          those entities,  particularly  during the period in which the periodic
          reports are being prepared;

     b.   Evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          the report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c.   Presented in the report their  conclusions  about the effectiveness of
          the disclosure controls and procedures based on their evaluation as of
          the Evaluation Date;

5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
     based  on our  most  recent  evaluation,  to the  small  business  issuer's
     auditors  and the audit  committee  of the board of  directors  (or persons
     fulfilling the equivalent function):

     a.   All significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation  of internal  controls or  financial  reporting  which could
          adversely  affect the issuer's ability to record,  process,  summarize
          and report financial data; and

     b.   Any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant  role in the small business  issuer's
          internal controls over financial reporting.


August 15, 2005

/s/ STEPHEN K. RADUSCH
----------------------------
Stephen K. Radusch
Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                                  NEWS RELEASE

For More Information, Call 713-507-7292         For Release - September 13, 2002
Eugene Putnam, Jr.


STERLING BANCSHARES CLOSES EAGLE NATIONAL BANK ACQUISITION



HOUSTON - Sterling Bancshares, Inc. (Nasdaq: SBIB) announced today that it has
completed the acquisition of Dallas-based ENB Bankshares, Inc. and its
subsidiary bank, Eagle National Bank. Eagle National, with approximately $70
million in total assets, has a single location in Dallas.

Sterling Bancshares, Inc. is a Houston-based bank holding company that operates
39 community-banking offices in the greater metro areas of Dallas, Houston, San
Antonio, and South Texas. Sterling also provides mortgage-banking services
through its 80 percent-owned subsidiary, Sterling Capital Mortgage Company.
Sterling's common stock is traded through the Nasdaq National Market System
under the symbol SBIB. For more information on Sterling Bancshares, please visit
the Company's web site at www.banksterling.com.
NOV. 23. 2010 9: 24AM 

U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

F A 8 REGIONAL COUNSEL, AEA-7 

( 

Eastern Region 

Certified Mail- Return Receipt Requested, Telephone Facsimile 

. NOV 2 3 2010 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder 

CWef Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M·20 

Room E12·320 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Tel: 202-366"2142 

Fax: 202-366-7536 

NQ 2737 P. 2/2 

d(f If

/1;;fV~ "~~ 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, New York 11434 

F ~x: 118-995-5699 

Tel: 718·553·3273 

N 

W 

J> 

Re: In the Matter of Colgan Air, lnc., CP09EA0017. 

Judge Yoder: 

TIns is to confinn that the parties have settled this matter with the payment of a civil penalty and the 

issuallce of an order assessing civil penalty, and as a result Respondent withdraws its request for 

hearing. 

Sincerely, 

Alfred R. Johl1.son 

:~ lS1fallLeWe 

AttOl'l1.ey 

cc: Charles W, Ryru1, III, Fax: 703-336-8750 

1
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 135 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J. Res.135

                       One Hundred Fifth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  eight

                            Joint Resolution

 
 Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1999, and 
                           for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That section 106(c) of Public 
Law 105-240 is further amended by striking ``October 14, 1998'' and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``October 16, 1998''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### COM. v. NAYLOR, R.

2964 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/08/2017

CP-28-CR-0004290-2015 (Delaware)

Affirmed — Application to Withdraw as Counsel Granted
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 297

Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 25, 1998

Mr. GOSS submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was considered

and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 That when the House adjourns on the legislative day

4 of Thursday, June 25, 1998, it stand adjourned until

5 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, July 14, 1998, or until noon on

6 the second day after Members are notified to reassemble

7 pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, which8 ever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses or

9 adjourns at the close of business on Friday, June 26,

10 1998, Saturday, June 27, 1998, or Sunday, June 28,

11 1998, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority Leader,

12 or his designee, in accordance with this concurrent resolu-
2

HCON 297 ATH

1 tion, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday,

2 July 6, 1998, or such time on that day as may be specified

3 by the Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to

4 recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after

5 Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section

6 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.

7 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

8 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

9 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead10 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House

11 and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

12 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Æ
#### SAUERBIER RANCHES, INC.; et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CATLIN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-35280

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 7, 2017 * Seattle, Washington

Filed December 11, 2017

Linda Deola, Scott Peterson, Morrison, Sherwood, Wilson & Deola, PLLP, Helena, MT, for Plaintiffs-Appellants

Randall G. Nelson, Nelson Law Firm, P.C., Martha Sheehy, Sheehy Law Firm, Billings, MT, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

1. The district court properly granted Catlin Specialty Insurance Company’s motion for judgment as a matter of law. Cat-lin is not liable under the Montana Unfair Trade Practices Act because it “had a reasonable basis in law ... for contesting the claim or the amount of the claim.” Mont. *666Code Ann. § 33-18-242(5). Contrary to Sauerbier Ranches’ argument, the question whether an insurer reasonably interpreted precedent in making a coveragef decision is a legal question for the court. *State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Freyer,*372 Mont. 191, 312 P.3d 403, 418-19 (2013). Here, the insurance policy is governed by New York law, and cases applying New York law support Catlin’s interpretation of the “Interrelated Wrongful Acts” provision. *See Quanta Lines Ins. Co. v. Inv’rs Capital Corp.,*No. 06-CIV-4624-PKL, 2009 WL 4884096, at *2, *14 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 17, 2009), *aff'd sub nom. Quanta Specialty Lines Ins. Co. v. Inv’rs Capital Corp.,*403 Fed.Appx. 530 (2d Cir. 2010); *Zahler v. Twin City Fire Ins. Co.,*No. 04-CIV-10299-LAP, 2006 WL 846352, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2006).

Because we affirm the district court’s grant of judgment as a matter of law, we need not address Sauerbier Ranches’ evi-dentiary arguments.

2. The district court properly dismissed the individual shareholders. Under Montana law, corporate shareholders cannot “pursue an action on their own behalf when the cause of action accrues to the corporation.” *Johnson v. Booth,*343 Mont. 268, 184 P.3d 289, 293 (2008) (citation omitted). Because the individual shareholders did not invest in the tenant-in-common property themselves, Montana law does not recognize their claims.

Appellants shall bear the costs of appeal. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 39(a)(2).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3,
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                            742,552
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   2,608,736
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                       470,065
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                4,551,331
<PP&E>                                          3,586,941
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 11,708,455
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           2,195,186
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                              915
<OTHER-SE>                                      8,953,373
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   11,708,455
<SALES>                                        12,391,205
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               12,391,205
<CGS>                                           8,479,515
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  11,634,073
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  131,357
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 50,699
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   757,132
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               757,132
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      625,775
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .07
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 106 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J. Res.106

                       One Hundred Fifth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-seven

                            Joint Resolution

 
 Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1998, and 
                           for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That section 106(3) of Public 
Law 105-46 is further amended by striking ``November 14, 1997'' and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``November 26, 1997'', and each provision 
amended by sections 122 and 123 of such public law shall be applied as 
if ``November 26, 1997'' was substituted for ``October 23, 1997''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 45

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp should be issued

to honor Bishop Frederic Baraga.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 11, 1997

Mr. STUPAK submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp

should be issued to honor Bishop Frederic Baraga.

Whereas Bishop Frederic Baraga was an influential and heroic figure in the Great Lakes region;

Whereas Bishop Frederic Baraga was a tireless champion of

Native Americans;

Whereas Bishop Frederic Baraga adamantly defended the

right of the native people of Michigan to remain in their

ancestral territory;

Whereas Bishop Baraga focused primarily on literacy, writing, and the publishing of books in native languages;

Whereas Bishop Baraga was a strong advocate of education;
2

•HCON 45 IH

Whereas issuing a postage stamp to honor the achievements

made by Bishop Frederic Baraga is proper and fitting:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) a postage stamp should be issued to honor

4 Bishop Frederic Baraga; and

5 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee of

6 the United States Postal Service should recommend

7 to the Postmaster General that such a postage

8 stamp is issued.

Æ
No. 11-1398.

#### Miller *v.*Patrick Henry Estates Homeowners Assn., Inc.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.