alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2 Certification of CFO Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act
 Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 I, S. Douglas Post, certify that:
 I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of BF Enterprises, Inc.;Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andDisclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and
1The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andAny fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.**BF ENTERPRISES, INC.**Date:  May 10, 2004
By:
/s/ S. Douglas PostVice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

GREGORY AARON THOMAS,

Petitioner

v.

TOM WOLF, GOVERNOR OF

PENNSYLVANIA AND JOHN WETZEL,

SECRETARY OF THE PA DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 82 EM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15th day of October , 2019

, the Petition for Leave to Appeal Nunc

Pro Tunc is DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         891,393
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,454
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               976,502
<PP&E>                                      16,715,890
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,609,149
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,083,243
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          438,427
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,644,816
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,083,243
<SALES>                                      1,835,457
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,984,526
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,463,665
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                520,861
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            520,861
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   520,861
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    12.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    12.61
        

</TABLE>
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 24

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp should be issued

in recognition of the services rendered by this Nation’s volunteer firefighters.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 25, 1997

Mr. FORBES submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp

should be issued in recognition of the services rendered

by this Nation’s volunteer firefighters.

Whereas volunteer firefighters, a brotherhood of patriotic

Americans dedicated to saving our communities from the

ravages of fire, place the public health and welfare, and

the security of our homes, schools, and places of worship

ahead of their own personal safety;

Whereas 1998 marks the 350th anniversary of the first volunteer fire department in the United States;

Whereas there are over 800,000 volunteer firefighters serving

in the United States;

Whereas 87 percent of our Nation’s fire service is conducted

by volunteers;
2

•HCON 24 IH

Whereas there are over 24,000 fire departments in the United States that are staffed in whole or in part by volunteers; and

Whereas these professionally trained men and women have

dedicated thousands of hours of their personal time to

advanced training toward the end of safeguarding the

lives and property of others: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee of the United States

4 Postal Service should recommend to the Postmaster Gen5 eral that a postage stamp be issued to commemorate the

6 350th anniversary of the Volunteer Fire Service.

Æ
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Fortis Networks, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 61208

)

Under Contract No. W912BV-14-D-0005 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: David A. Rose, Esq.

 Rose Consulting Law Firm

 Valdosta, GA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

 Engineer Chief Trial Attorney

Ronald J. Goodeyon, Esq.

Stephanie J. Milburn, Esq.

 Engineer Trial Attorneys

 U.S. Army Engineer, Tulsa District

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: January 11, 2022

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61208, Appeal of Fortis Networks, 

Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: January 11, 2022

KENNETH D. WOODROW

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
Exhibit 4.3

 

	
Number
   A-
    	
Incorporated   Under the Laws of the State of Alaska
    	
Shares
   0-
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Cusip No.
    


 

GCI LIBERTY, INC.

 

Class A Common Stock, no par value

 

Specimen Certificate

 

This Certifies that [          ]  is the owner of [          ] FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF CLASS A COMMON STOCK, NO PAR VALUE, OF GCI LIBERTY, INC. (hereinafter called the “Corporation”) transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of the Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.

 

Witness, the seal of the Corporation and the signatures of its duly authorized officers.

 

Dated:

 

GCI Liberty, Inc.

[Corporate Seal]

 

	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
President
    	
Secretary
    
			


 

The Corporation is authorized to issue shares of more than one class of common stock and also more than one series of a class of preferred stock.  The Corporation will furnish to a shareholder upon request and without charge, a full or summary statement of the designations, preferences, limitations, and relative rights of the shares of each class authorized to be issued and the variations in the relative rights and preferences between the shares of each series so far as they have been fixed and determined and the authority of the board of directors of the Corporation to fix and determine the relative rights and preferences of subsequent series.
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 99.3
                                  ------------

Certification  Pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002

The  undersigned,  who  is  the  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  International
Microcomputer  Software,  Inc.  (the  "Company"),  hereby certifies that (i) the
restated  Quarterly  Report  on Form 10-QSB/A for the three and six-month period
ended  December  31,  2001,  as  filed  by  the  Company with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  (the  "Annual  Report"), to which this Certification is an
Exhibit,  fully  complies  with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and
15(d)  of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly
Report  fairly  presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and
results  of  operations  of  the  Company.


Dated:  December  27,  2002

By:  /s/  Martin  Wade,  III
Martin  Wade,  III
Director  &  Chief  Executive  Officer

                                       38
<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           36800
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 36800
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  438100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1483
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           194
<OTHER-SE>                                      436423
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    438100
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   793
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     8054
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7261)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       856
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (8117)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (285078)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (293195)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)
        

</TABLE>
IA

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 135

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1999, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 14, 1998

Mr. LIVINGSTON introduced the following joint resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

1999, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 106(c) of Public Law 105–240 is further

4 amended by striking ‘‘October 14, 1998’’ and inserting in

5 lieu thereof ‘‘October 16, 1998’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 1

                          EARNINGS PER SHARE SCHEDULE
<TABLE>
   <S>                                                    <C>
    Calculation of net income

         Net Income (loss)                                  ($97,609)
         Assumed interest expense reduction                        0
         Assumed interest income increase                          0
                                                           ----------
                                                            ($97,609)
                                                           ==========     

    Calculation of weighted average number of shares
         Weighted average shares outstanding                 500,000
         Common stock equivalents                                  0
                                                           ----------
                                                             500,000
                                                           ==========
         Net income (loss) per share
                                                             ($ 0.20)
                                                           ==========
</TABLE>
                                   -15-
<PAGE>
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 136

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the

fiscal year 1999, and for other purposes.
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 136

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

1999, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 106(c) of Public Law 105–240 is further
2

•HJ 136 EH

1 amended by striking ‘‘October 16, 1998’’ and inserting in

2 lieu thereof ‘‘October 20, 1998’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 16,

1998.

Attest:

Clerk.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.2
                                  ------------
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, William J. Bush, certify that:

         1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
International Microcomputer Software, Inc;

         2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered by this
quarterly report;

         3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;

         4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a.   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
periods in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b.   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c.   Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date.

         5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a.   All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b.   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

         6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant efficiencies and material weaknesses.


Dated: November 14, 2002

By:  /s/ William J. Bush
William J. Bush
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)

                                       26
<PAGE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 16, 2009 

d0909 

Order 

 

September 16, 2009 

138562 & (64) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138562 

 COA: 281666 

Wayne CC: 07-007697-01 

DIONTE MARQUIS NEAL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_______________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 24, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to 

remand is DENIED.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 12

                STATEMENT SETTING FORTH DETAIL FOR COMPUTATION OF
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                              (Millions of dollars)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            Year Ended December 31,
                                                                   ---------------------------------------
                                                                     2001     2000     1999   1998    1997
                                                                     ----     ----     ----   ----    ----
<S>                                                                <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>    <C>
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes.      $ (221)  $  693   $ (104)  $  89  $ 456
Fixed charges:
     Interest expense, gross..................................        495      627      717     385    103
     Portion of rentals representative of interest............         44       46       53      35     19
                                                                   ---------------------------------------
          Total fixed charges before capitalized interest.....        539      673      770     420    122
     Capitalized interest.....................................          3       --       --      --      5
                                                                   ---------------------------------------
          Total fixed charges including capitalized interest.         542      673      770     420    127
                                                                   ---------------------------------------
Earnings before fixed charges.................................     $  318   $1,366   $  666   $ 509  $ 578
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (a)........................         --      2.0       --     1.2    4.6
                                                                   =======================================
</TABLE>

(a)  In 2001 and 1999, earnings were insufficient to cover fixed
     charges by $224 million and $104 million, respectively.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wendy Annette MOORE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6869

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 29, 2017

Decided: January 12, 2018

Wendy Annette Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Rhett DeHart, Nathan S. Williams, Assistant United States Attorneys, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Wendy Annette Moore seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the *794denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Moore has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*