### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10
- 17

- 00004
- CV LOWELL QUINCY GREEN , Appellant v. HONORABLE MATT JOHNS ON, CITY OF WACO, DECTECTIVE MANUEL CH AVEZ, OFFICER JASON DAVIS, OFFICER ERIN NEWTON, OFFICER CRAIG STONE, DA ABEL REYNA, BRAND ON LUCE, AND LAWRENCE E. JOHN SON , Appellee s

From the McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No.

MEMORANDUM OPINION
On January 9, 2017, Lowell Quincy Green filed in this Court an original petition under Title 42, Section 1983 of the United States Co de against Judge Matt Johnson of the 54th Judicial District Court; the City of Waco; Waco Police Detective Manuel Chavez; Waco Police Officers Jason Davis, Erin Newton, and Craig Stone; McLennan CountyG reen v. Johnson, et al. Page 2

District Attorney Abel Reyna; Assistant Prosecutor Bra ndon Luce; and Public Defender Lawrence E. Johnson. On January 26, 2017, we notified Green of our concern that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal because it appears that there is no final judgment or appealable order in this case. We requested a respo nse from Green showing grounds for continuing the appeal. Green ha s not responded to our letter. Only final decisions of a trial court are appealable. Gregory v. Foster , 35 S.W.3d 255, 257 (Tex. App.

— Texarkana 2000, no pet.) (citing N.E. Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Aldridge , 400 S.W.2d 893, 895 (Tex. 1966)). Indeed, the Texas Supreme Court has held that an appeal may be taken only from a final judgment and certain interlocutory orders identified by
statute. See Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); see also Macon v. Tex. Dep’t of Criminal Justice

- Inst. Div. , No. 10

- 10

- 00150

- CV, 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 4207, at **2

- 3 (Tex. App.

— Waco May 23, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op.) (“Unless an interlocutory appeal is expressly authorized by statute, we only have jurisdiction over an appeal t aken from a final judgment.”). Based on our review of the record in this matter, Green is not attempting to appeal from a final, appealable order. Rather, Green has filed a new original petition asserting
Section 1983 cl aims against the aforementioned parties in this Court. We lack jurisdiction over such a filing. See Lehmann , 39 S.W.3d at 195; Aguilar v. Weber , 72 S.W.3d 729, 731 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2002, no pet.) (“Appellate court jurisdiction of the merits of a case
exte nds no further than that of the court from which the appeal is taken.” (citing NabejasG reen v. Johnson, et al. Page 3

v. Tex. Dep’t of Pub. Safety , 972 S.W.2d 875, 876 (Tex. App.

— Corpus Christi 1998, no pet.)); see also Macon , 20102 Tex. App. LEXIS 4207, at **2

- 3. Therefore, because th ere is no final judgment or appealable, interlocutory order, we dismiss this matter for want of jurisdiction. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f); Lehmann , 39 S.W.3d at 195; see also Macon , 2012 T ex. App. LEXIS 4207, at **2

- 3. Absent a specific exemption , the Clerk of the Court must collect filing fees at the time a document is presented for filing. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 12.1(b); Appendix to Tex. R. App. P., Order Regarding Fees (Amended Aug. 28, 2007, eff. Sept. 1, 2007); see T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5;
10 TH T EX
. A PP
. (W ACO ) L OC
. R. 5; T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN
. §§ 51.207(b), 51,208, 51.941(a) (West 2013). Under these circumstances, we suspend the rule and order the Clerk to write off all unpaid filing fees in this case. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 2. The write

- off of the fees from t he accounts receivable of the Court in no way eliminates or reduces the fees owed.

AL SCOGGINS Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed March 15, 2017 [CV06]G reen v. Johnson, et al. Page 4