alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 32001R1807 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32001R1807

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1807/2001 of 13 September 2001 amending representative prices and additional duties for the import of certain products in the sugar sector **

*
Official Journal L 244 , 14/09/2001 P. 0030 - 0031 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1807/2001

of 13 September 2001

amending representative prices and additional duties for the import of certain products in the sugar sector

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector(1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1423/95 of 23 June 1995 laying down detailed implementing rules for the import of products in the sugar sector other than molasses(2), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 624/98(3), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 1(2), and Article 3(1) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) The amounts of the representative prices and additional duties applicable to the import of white sugar, raw sugar and certain syrups are fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1309/2001(4), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1752/2001(5).

(2) It follows from applying the general and detailed fixing rules contained in Regulation (EC) No 1423/95 to the information known to the Commission that the representative prices and additional duties at present in force should be altered to the amounts set out in the Annex hereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The representative prices and additional duties on imports of the products referred to in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1423/95 shall be as set out in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 14 September 2001.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 September 2001.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 141, 24.6.1995, p. 16.

(3) OJ L 85, 20.3.1998, p. 5.

(4) OJ L 177, 30.6.2001, p. 21.

(5) OJ L 235, 4.9.2001, p. 9.

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 13 September 2001 amending representative prices and the amounts of additional duties applicable to imports of white sugar, raw sugar and products covered by CN code 1702 90 99

>TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 28, 2013

t0520 

# Order

Clerk May 28, 2013

146769

LEE GULLEY, Personal Representative of the

Estate of Jeremiah Gulley,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 146769

COA: 304291

Kalamazoo CC: 2010

- 000431

- NO

ROBERT SMITH and JOHN SCHMIDT,

Defendants

- Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 27, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Emerald Dairy Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended
September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Shu Kaneko, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:  November
16, 2009





By:
              /s/ Shu
  KanekoName:
              Shu
      KanekoTitle:
              Chief
      Financial Officer and Secretary(Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 99

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of OurPet's Company (the Company) on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
being the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 0f 2002, that:

     (1) I have reviewed this annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
         December 31, 2002 of OurPet's Company.

     (2) Based on my knowledge, this annual Report does not
         contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
         made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
         made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
         Report; and

     (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
         information included in this annual Report, fairly present in all
         material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
         cash flows or the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
         this annual Report.


      /s/ Steven Tsengas                               /s/ John G. Murchie
      ------------------                               -------------------
      BY STEVEN TSENGAS                                BY JOHN G. MURCHIE
      Chairman of the Board and                        Chief Financial Officer
      Chief Executive Officer


      Dated:  March 27, 2003                           Dated:  March 27, 2003
              --------------                                   --------------

     This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained in that statute, and not for
any other purpose.
Exhibit
31.1









CERTIFICATION








I, Tony Tong, certify
that:




1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PacificNet Inc.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:




(a).
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;




(b).
evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c).
disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal
control over financial reporting; and




5. The
small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):




(a). all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and




(b). any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting.








Dated:  August
      18, 2008
            By:/s/ Tony
      TongName:
      Tony TongTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
  Officer)
No. 11-10246.

#### McReynolds *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
DENY and Opinion Filed April 27, 2022 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00282-CV 

IN RE KATERINA MARIE RENO, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 380th Judicial District Court 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 380-50667-2021 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Osborne, Partida-Kipness, and Smith 

Opinion by Justice Smith 

Before the Court is relator’s March 31, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus in 

which she challenges the trial court’s modifications of the temporary orders and final 

protective orders. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the 

trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that she has no adequate appellate 

remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. 

proceeding). 

After reviewing the petition, response, reply, and the record, we conclude that 

relator has failed to show an abuse of discretion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. 

 
 –2– 

We also lift the stay issued by this Court’s March 31, 2022 order. 

220282F.P05 

/Craig Smith/

CRAIG SMITH 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 99.4
                                  ------------

     Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of International
Microcomputer Software, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that (i) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three-month period ended September 30,
2002, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Annual Report"), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with
the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
(ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: November 14, 2002

By:  /s/ William J. Bush
William J. Bush
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)


                                       28
P.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

178) IV-C-145 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:21:00 AM Sheet 178 of 232 
P.2 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

.-*#.•.;:••?-. • •-••.'-• i:. •- •.•• • '^f>y- -:.• rv- •: •.:• \ fcyj^c£*f 7. 

\'V-KSfc •*•;?•'• X-.. .•'•.-te?::'.-

£ a** ,#^Q£ 

•v±M':% 

.. #^^:.-;- ; •v'«0 

-.<* • •v'V V\ V J 

Mr. Richard E. Ayres, Chairman 

National Clean Air Coalition 

801 Pennsylvania Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20003 

Dear Mr. Ayres: 

Thank you for your November 16, 1988 letter to the 

Administrator expressing the National Clean Air Coalition's 

support of EPA's efforts to reduce ozone levels through 

gasoline volatility controls, onboard refueling controls and 

control of vehicle running losses. We believe that these 

measures ace indeed a very cost effective approach to ozone 

control. EPA remains committed to completing action on these 

issues as fast as possible. 

Thank you again for your comments on our proposals. We 

will place your letter in both the onboard refueling control 

and gasoline volatility control dockets. 

Sincerely, 

[fSIGKSD; *C=* * r-.-v 

Don R. Clay 

Acting Assistan t Administrator 

for Air and Radiation 

c c : Docket A-87-11 

Docket A-85-21
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 64 (Monday, April 4, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 19516]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06452]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE


Request for Nominations for the Board of Governors of the 
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)

AGENCY: Government Accountability Office (GAO).

ACTION: Request for letters of nomination and resumes.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act gave the 
Comptroller General of the United States responsibility for appointing 
up to 21 members to the Board of Governors of the Patient-Centered 
Outcomes Research Institute. In addition, the Directors of the Agency 
for Healthcare Research and Quality and the National Institutes of 
Health, or their designees, are members of the Board. As the result of 
terms ending in September 2022, GAO is accepting nominations in the 
following categories: A surgeon, a state-licensed integrative health 
care practitioner, a representative of patients and health care 
consumers, a representative of device manufacturers or developers, a 
representative of pharmaceutical manufacturers or developers, and a 
representative of private payers who represents health insurance 
issuers. Nominations should be sent to the email address listed below. 
Acknowledgement of submissions will be provided within a week of 
submission.

DATES: Letters of nomination and resumes should be submitted no later 
than May 10, 2022, to ensure adequate opportunity for review and 
consideration of nominees prior to appointment.

ADDRESSES: Submit letters of nomination and resumes to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b8e8fbf7eaf1f8dfd9d796dfd7ce"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6f3f2c203d262f080e0041080019">[email protected]</span></a>. 
Include PCORI Nomination in the subject line of the email.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ray Sendejas at (202) 512-7113 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d281b7bcb6b7b8b3a18092b5b3bdfcb5bda4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9ecdfbf0fafbf4ffedccdef9fff1b0f9f1e8">[email protected]</span></a> if you do not receive an acknowledgement or need 
additional information. For general information, contact GAO's Office 
of Public Affairs, (202) 512-4800.
    Authority: Sec. 6301 and Sec. 10602, Pub. L. 111-148, 124 Stat. 
119, 727, 1005 (2010); Div. N, Sec. 104, Pub. L. 116-94, 133 Stat. 2534 
(2019).

Gene L. Dodaro,
Comptroller General of the United States.
[FR Doc. 2022-06452 Filed 4-1-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey Michael DONNELLY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-15837

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted January 9, 2018 San Francisco, California

Filed January 31, 2018

Elizabeth Olson White, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USRE — Office of the US Attorney-Reno, Reno, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Cristen C. Thayer, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant

Before: WALLACE, RAWLINSON, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

1. Jeffrey Donnelly’s motion under 28 Ú.S.C. § 2255 is timely. He filed the motion contesting his Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) sentencing enhancement within one year of the Supreme Court’s decision in *Johnson v. United States,*— U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015), as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)(3). Donnelly’s motion relies on *Johnson,*which invalidated the ACCA’s residual clause, because it challenges a sentence that may have been based on the legal theory that *Johnson*rejected. *United States v. Geozos,*870 F.3d 890, 894-95 (9th Cir. 2017). The sentence may have been based on an invalid legal theory because “it is unclear from the record whether the sentencing court relied on the residual clause.” *Id.*at 895. The Presentence Report and sentencing minutes — the only relevant documents available — do not specify which clause was the basis for Donnelly’s sentence. Nor does the district court’s later characterization of the '2005 sentence or the legal background in 2005 clarify the basis; *See id.*at 897.

*3362. Donnelly’s motion must be granted. Two of Donnelly’s three predicate convictions are for robbery and armed robbery in violation of Fla. Stat. § 812.13. But under *Geozos,*which was decided after the district court ruled, convictions under § 812.13 do not qualify as convictions for a violent felony. *See id.*at 897, 899 n.8, 901. Thus, Donnelly lacks the three violent felony convictions needed for an ACCA enhancement. *See*18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1); *Geozos,*870 F.3d at 893.

We reverse the district court’s order denying Donnelly’s § 2255 motion and remand with instructions to vacate Donnelly’s sentence. *See Geozos,*870 F.3d at 901. Because Donnelly has already served more than the maximum ten year term authorized for a § 922(g)(1) conviction absent an ACCA enhancement, the district court shall direct that Donnelly be released from custody immediately. *See*18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2); *Geozos,*870 F.3d at 901. On remand, the district court may .exercise its discretion in imposing a lawful term of supervised release. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3583. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### DELPHIX CORP., Appellant v. Joseph MATAL, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Intervenor

2016-2072

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

December 12, 2017

J. David Hadden, Fenwick & West, LLP, Mountain View, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by Saína S. Shamilov; Todd Richard Gregorian, Phillip John Haack, San Francisco, CA.

Philip J. Warrick, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for interve-nor. Aso represented by Nathan K. Kelley, Thomas W. Krause, Coke Morgan Stewart.

(Prost, Chief Judge, Lourie and Hughes, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
## Table 48. Shutdown and Reactivated Refineries During 2003 Total Atmospheric Crude Oil Total Downstream Distillation Charge Capacity Date Date of Last Date PAD District/Refinery Location Capacity (bbl/cd) (bbl/sd) Operable Operation Shutdown

bbl/cd = Barrels per calendar day. bbl/sd = Barrels per stream day. Sources: Energy Information Administration (EIA), Form EIA-810, "Monthly Refinery Report," and Form EIA-820, "Annual Refinery Report." 

# THERE WERE NO SHUTDOWNS OR REACTIVATIONS DURING 2003

Energy Information Administration/Petroleum Supply Annual 2003, Volume 1 

## 127
Stock Agreement


 


This Stock Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of December
15, 2017, confirms our understanding with respect to the issuance of Common Stock of Liberated Syndication Inc. (the “Company”)
to Douglas Polinsky (the “Director”) with respect to the matters set forth herein.


 


The Board of Directors has awarded 200,000 shares of the Company’s
common stock (the “Stock”), subject to certain milestones and forfeiture clauses, to the Director. In an effort to
incentivize the Directors, the Board of Directors has set forth the following milestones and forfeiture clauses for these shares
of stock.


 


1. $5.00 per share


When the Company obtains an average of $5.00 per share closing price (adjusted
for stock splits) for any 10 consecutive trading days, the Director will retain 50% of the stock (100,000 shares), if obtained
within 30 months.


 


2. $7.00 per share


When the Company obtains an average of $7.00 per share closing price (adjusted
for stock splits) for any 10 consecutive trading days, the Director will retain 50% of the stock (100,000 shares), if obtained
within 36 months.


 


The effect of this grant on the market cap of the Company will NOT be taken
into consideration in attaining the milestone goals for the stock agreement dated April 13, 2017 between Douglas Polinsky and Liberated
Syndication Inc.


 


 


ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:


 


Douglas Polinsky


 


 


By:___________________________________________________


Name: Douglas Polinsky


 


 


Liberated Syndication Inc.


 


 


By:_____________________________________________________


Name: Chris Spencer


Title: Chairman of the Board of Directors