alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             770
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3196
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       3110
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  7476
<PP&E>                                            3121
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   11381
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             7571
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                        3549
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     11381
<SALES>                                           5596
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  5596
<CGS>                                             3822
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4674
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    24
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  70
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    837
<INCOME-TAX>                                        99
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                738
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (131)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       607
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .012
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .012
        

</TABLE>
Mr. Dennis DeVany 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

US Dept. of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington DC, 20590 

/ 

May 15th, 2013 l.,,,. .... 

•. i )"· . 

'. i 

RE: DOT-OST-2000-8556- Continuation of Alaska Airlines EAS Service at Adak, Alaska 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

This letter is to express strong support for Alaska Airlines being selected to continue to 

provide essential air service using jet aircraft to our community. 

Adak Community Development Corporation (ACDC) is a non-profit community 

organization devoted to promoting seafood harvesting and processing capacity in Adak. 

ACDC has invested in seafood infrastructure in Adak that is extremely dependant on 

the type and reliability of service provided by Alaska Airlines. 

We have reviewed the proposal for provision of Essential Air Service and firmly believe 

that Alaska Airlines is the best value. 

The service Alaska Airlines is currently providing is critical for the continued access 

and economic well being of Adak as well as that of this entire region of the state. 

The existing pattern of service - using jet aircraft - offers important benefits that would 

be difficult, if not impossible, to match with any other type of service or aircraft type: 

• Route network J ease of connections- Alaska Airlines route system now stretches 

coast to coast and marketing partnerships with other carriers provide virtually a 

global reach. Service from our community to the hub in Anchorage provides easy 

access to this network. 

• Incoming freight capabilities - Our community depends on scheduled air freight 

shipments for many of our daily n~cessities and the added cargo capacity of Alaska's 
"combi" aircraft is extremely important. Additionally, our economic base is closely 

tied to commercial fishing. 

• Outgoing freight capabilities - Alaska's jet service offers key cargo capacity allowing 

transport of 10,000 lbs or more of fresh seafood products to the rest of the U.S. in a 

timely, dependable manner. ACDC is involved in shipping live crab and fresh 

halibut out of Adak on Alaska Airlines, and this marketing channel has been critical 

to our local fleet. 

Given the lack of any road system connecting our extremely remote community with the 

rest of the state, Adak is particularly isolated. Accordingly, ACDC and the other 

participants in the seafood industry are extremely dependent on reliable air access. 

Alaska Airlines has provided this access very capably for the many years. 

For these reasons, we respectfully urge DOT to select Alaska Airlines for continued 

essential air service to Adak. 

Thank you for your consideration of our comments. 

Sincerely, 

Adak Community Development Corporation 

P.O. Box 1943 

Adak AK, 99546
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 265 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con. Res.265
                                           Agreed to May 8, 1998        

                       One Hundred Fifth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  eight

                          Concurrent Resolution

 

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZING USE OF THE EAST FRONT FOR PERFORMANCES SPONSORED 
              BY THE KENNEDY CENTER.

    In carrying out its duties under section 4 of the John F. Kennedy 
Center Act (20 U.S.C. 76j), the John F. Kennedy Center for the 
Performing Arts in cooperation with the National Park Service (in this 
resolution jointly referred to as the ``sponsor'') may sponsor public 
performances on the East Front of the Capitol Grounds at such dates and 
times as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and Committee on 
Rules and Administration of the Senate may approve jointly.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Any performance authorized under section 1 shall 
be free of admission charge to the public and arranged not to interfere 
with the needs of Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by the 
Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board.
    (b) Assumption of Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all liabilities incident to all activities 
associated with the performance.

SEC. 3. PREPARATIONS.

    (a) Structures and Equipment.--In consultation with the Speaker of 
the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and 
Administration of the Senate, the Architect of the Capitol shall 
provide upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, sound amplification 
devices, and other related structures and equipment as may be required 
for a performance authorized under section 1.
    (b) Additional Arrangements.--The Architect of the Capitol and the 
Capitol Police Board may make such additional arrangements as may be 
required to carry out the performance.

SEC. 4. APPLICABILITY OF PROHIBITIONS.

    Nothing in this resolution may be construed to waive the 
applicability of the prohibitions established by section 4 of the Act 
of July 31, 1946 (40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, 
displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds.

SEC. 5. EXPIRATION OF AUTHORITY.

    A performance may not be conducted under this resolution after 
September 30, 1998.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 20, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-40179

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE CRUZ CORTEZ-MELENDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:04-CR-1631-ALL

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Cruz Cortez-Melendez appeals his conviction and

sentence following his plea of guilty to one count of unlawful

re-entry. Melendez first contends that the district court’s 16-

level enhancement of his offense level based on his prior drug

trafficking conviction violated his constitutional rights in

light of United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). As the

enhancement was based on a prior conviction, there is no Sixth

Amendment error; rather, any error was in the application of the

Sentencing Guidelines as mandatory, which we have termed “Fanfan”
No. 05-40179

-2-

error. See United States v. Walters, 418 F.3d 464, 463 (5th Cir.

2005) (discussing the distinction between the two types of error

addressed in Booker). When “Fanfan” error is preserved in the

district court, this court “will ordinarily vacate the sentence

and remand, unless we can say the error was harmless.” United

States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 520 n.9 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,

126 S. Ct. 43 (2005). As there is no indication in the record

that the district court would have imposed the same sentence

under an advisory rather than mandatory Guidelines scheme, the

Government cannot carry its burden of demonstrating harmless

error, a point that the Government effectively concedes. See

United States v. Akpan, 407 F.3d 360, 376-77 (5th Cir. 2005), 

Cortez next argues that the felony and aggravated felony

provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional because

they treat prior convictions as sentencing factors rather than

offense elements. Cortez’s constitutional challenge is

foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224,

235 (1998). Although Cortez contends that Almendarez-Torres was

incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court

would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such

arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. 

See United States v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.),

cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Cortez properly concedes

that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and
No. 05-40179

-3-

circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for

further review. 

For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM Cortez’s conviction,

but we VACATE his sentence and REMAND for re-sentencing.

AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 62 (Thursday, March 31, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18871-18873]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06768]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control


Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets 
Control (OFAC) is publishing the names one or more persons that have 
been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked 
Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC's determination that one or more 
applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in 
property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and 
U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions 
with them.

DATES: See Supplementary Information section for effective date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OFAC: Andrea Gacki, Director, tel.: 
202-622-2490; Associate Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202-622-
2420; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480; Assistant 
Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202-622-4855; or the Assistant 
Director for Sanctions Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 202-622-2490.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Availability

    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions 
programs are available on OFAC's website (www.treasury.gov/ofac).

Notice of OFAC Action

    On March 25, 2022, OFAC determined that the property and interests 
in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following persons are 
blocked under the relevant sanction's authority listed below.
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P

[[Page 18872]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN31MR22.075


[[Page 18873]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN31MR22.076


    Dated: March 25, 2022.
Andrea M. Gacki,
Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the 
Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2022-06768 Filed 3-30-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-C
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 13, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 67985]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2013-26790]

[[Page 67985]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 170

RIN 3038-AE09

Membership in a Registered Futures Association

Correction

    In proposed rule document 13-26790 beginning on page 67078 in the 
issue of Friday, November 8, 2013, make the following correction:
    On page 67078, in the third column, under DATES, in the last line 
``January 17, 2014'' should read ``January 7, 2014''.

[FR Doc. C1-2013-26790 Filed 11-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk April 29, 2013

d0422 

# Order

April 29, 2013

146491

LINDA DETARY and JERRY DETARY,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

v SC: 146491

COA: 308179

Kent CC: 2008

- 010179

- NH

ADVANTAGE HEALTH PHYSICIANS, PC,

Defendant

- Appellant,

and

STEVEN A. CRANE, MD, PAUL O. FARR,

MD, GRAND RIVER GASTROENTEROLOGY,

PC, MUMNOON HAIDER, MD, JODY LYN

HEILMAN, MD, BAO THIEN HUYHN, MD,

NASIR ABBAS KHAN, and TRINITY

HEALTH

- MICHIGAN,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 29, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, becau se we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Powerhouse Technologies Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David R. Wells, Vice President Finance Operations (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

By: /s/ David R. Wells
    ------------------
David R. Wells
Vice President Finance Operations
(Principal Financial Officer)

Date: February 18, 2005
EXHIBIT 11.1

Coffee Holding Co., Inc.

Computation of Per Share Earnings

(Unaudited)

|                                                                   |  |      |            |      |   |           |  |      |            |   |   |           | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---- | ---------- | ---- | - | --------- |  | ---- | ---------- | - | - | --------- | 
|                                                                   |  | 2008 |            | 2007 |   | 2008      |  | 2007 |           
|Net Income (Loss)                                                  |  | $    | (1,861,913 | )    | $ | 648,592   |  | $    | (2,044,178 | ) | $ | 338,888   | 
|                                                                   |  |      |            |      |   |           |  |      |            |   |   |           | 
|BASIC EARNINGS:                                                    |  |      |            |      |   |           |  |      |            |   |   |           | 
|Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding               |  |      | 5,497,254  |      |   | 5,529,830 |  |      | 5,497,254  |   |   | 5,529,830 | 
|                                                                   |  |      |            |      |   |           |  |      |            |   |   |           | 
|Basic earnings (loss) per common share                             |  | $    | (.34       | )    | $ | .12       |  | $    | (.37       | ) | $ | .06       | 
|                                                                   |  |      |            |      |   |           |  |      |            |   |   |           | 
|DILUTED EARNINGS:                                                  |  |      |            |      |   |           |  |      |            |   |   |           | 
|Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding               |  |      | 5,497,254  |      |   | 5,529,830 |  |      | 5,497,254  |   |   | 5,529,830 | 
|Warrants  common stock equivalents                                |  |      | 0          |      |   | 70,000    |  |      | 0          |   |   | 0         | 
|                                                                   |  |      |            |      |   |           |  |      |            |   |   |           | 
|Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding  as adjusted |  |      | 5,497,254  |      |   | 5,599,830 |  |      | 5,497,254  |   |   | 5,529,830 | 
|                                                                   |  |      |            |      |   |           |  |      |            |   |   |           | 
|Diluted earnings (loss) per common
share                           |  | $    | (.34       | )    | $ | .12       |  | $    | (.37       | ) | $ | .06       |
No. 11-1248.

#### Panghat *v.*New York Downtown Hospital.

App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.
# EUR-Lex - 32003R0578 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32003R0578

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 578/2003 of 28 March 2003 derogating from Regulation (EC) No 174/1999 laying down special detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 as regards export licences and export refunds in the case of milk and milk products **

*
Official Journal L 082 , 29/03/2003 P. 0032 - 0032 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 578/2003

of 28 March 2003

derogating from Regulation (EC) No 174/1999 laying down special detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 as regards export licences and export refunds in the case of milk and milk products

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products(1), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 509/2002(2), and in particular Article 30(1) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 20a of Commission Regulation (EC) No 174/1999(3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 186/2003(4), lays down the rules for administering the milk powder quota for exports to the Dominican Republic under the Memorandum of Understanding between the European Community and the Dominican Republic, approved by Council Decision 98/486/EC(5). As a result of difficulties with the application of that Memorandum that could make amendments to the existing arrangements necessary, the application period for the quota for the period from 1 July 2003 to 30 June 2004 should be postponed.

(2) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

By way of derogation from Article 20a(7) of Regulation (EC) No 174/1999, for the period from 1 July 2003 to 30 June 2004, licence applications shall be lodged from 1 to 10 May 2003.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 March 2003.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48.

(2) OJ L 79, 22.3.2002, p. 15.

(3) OJ L 20, 27.1.1999, p. 8.

(4) OJ L 27, 1.2.2003, p. 11.

(5) OJ L 218, 6.8.1998, p. 45.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 04/04-0308]

Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small Business Administration under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, under Section 309 of the Act and Section 107.1900 of the Small Business Administration Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.1900) to function as a small business investment company under the Small Business Investment Company License No. 04/04-0308 issued to Plexus Fund II, L.P. said license is hereby declared null and void.

United States Small Business Administration.

Bailey DeVries,

Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation.

[FR Doc. 2022-06216 Filed 3-23-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P