alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

May 16, 2008

Mr. James W. Bowen

Hunton & Williams LLP

Fountain Place

1445 Ross Ave., Suite 3700

Dallas, TX 75202-2799

Honorable Sally Montgomery

County Court at Law #3

George L. Allen, Sr., Courts Building

600 Commerce St., 5th Floor

Dallas, TX 75202

Mr. William S. Snyder

Sayles | Werbner PC

1201 Elm Street, Suite 4400

Dallas, TX 75270

RE:Case Number:  06-0886

Court of Appeals Number:  05-05-01430-CV

Trial Court Number:  04-04729-C

Style:IN RE  CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS, INC. (F/K/A SALOMON SMITH BARNEY, INC.), CITIGROUP, INC., AND STACY OELSEN

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed per curiam opinion in the above-referenced cause.  The stay order issued November 21, 2006 is lifted.

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 06-0886Page 1**
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
  CERTIFICATION
    PURSUANT TO
    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
    SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    1.
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on
    Form 10-Q
    of Loral Space & Communications Inc.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
    statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
    necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
    circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
    financial information included in this report, fairly present in
    all material respects the financial condition, results of
    operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
    periods presented in this report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
    Rules 13a-15(e)
    and
    15d-15(e))
    and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
    Exchange Act
    Rules 13a-15(f)
    and
    15d-15(f))
    for the registrant and have:          5.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have
    disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
    control over financial reporting, to the registrants
    auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board
    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):      Richard
    J. Townsend
    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES—OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Annual Report of Yuengling’s Ice Cream Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended October 31,
2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert C. Bohorad, Chief
Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to
my knowledge:



(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated.



Date: March 15,
2022



|By: | /s/ Robert
    C. Bohorad                 
|--- | ------------------------------------------
|    | Robert C. Bohorad, Chief Executive Officer
|    | (Principal Executive)
September 15, 2015

Mr. Christopher R. Dodson

Principal, Director of Field Operations

Timmons Group

1001 Boulders Parkway, Suite 300

Richmond, VA 23225

Dear Mr. Dodson:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

§§ 45.23(b), 61.113(a) and (b), 61.133(a), 91.7(a) and (b), 91.9(b)(2), 91.109(a), 91.119, 

91.151(a), 91.203(a) and (b), 91.319(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2), and 

91.417(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We received your June 3, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Timmons Group filed in 

Docket No. FAA-2015-2529, but we are unable to process your request any further. Your 

petition does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider 

the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at

least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If

you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
3
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 649 

To authorize borrowers of loans under the William D. Ford Federal Direct 

Loan Program to modify the interest rate of such loans to be equal 

to the interest rate for such loans at the time of modification. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2015 

Mr. POCAN (for himself, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. CARTWRIGHT, Mr. SCHRADER, Ms. WILSON of Florida, Ms. CHU of California, 

Mr. ELLISON, Mr. KIND, Mr. COHEN, and Ms. BROWNLEY of California) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To authorize borrowers of loans under the William D. Ford 

Federal Direct Loan Program to modify the interest 

rate of such loans to be equal to the interest rate for 

such loans at the time of modification. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Student Loan Refi5 nancing Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 649 IH

1 SEC. 2. BORROWER MODIFICATION OF INTEREST RATES 

2 UNDER THE WILLIAM D. FORD FEDERAL DI3 RECT LOAN PROGRAM. 

4 Section 455(b) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

5 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(b)) is amended by adding at the end 

6 the following new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(11) BORROWER MODIFICATION OF INTEREST

8 RATE.— 

9 ‘‘(A) MODIFICATION.—Notwithstanding 

10 the preceding paragraphs of this subsection, the 

11 borrower of a Federal Direct Stafford Loan, a 

12 Federal Direct Unsubsidized Stafford Loan, a 

13 Federal Direct PLUS Loan, or a Federal Di14 rect Consolidation Loan may elect to modify the 

15 interest rate of the loan to be equal to the in16 terest rate that would be applicable to such loan 

17 if such loan were first disbursed (or in the case 

18 of a Federal Direct Consolidation Loan, first 

19 applied for) on the date on which such borrower 

20 elects to modify the interest rate of such loan. 

21 ‘‘(B) FIXED RATE.—Except as provided in 

22 subparagraph (C), an interest rate elected 

23 under subparagraph (A) for a loan shall be 

24 fixed for the life of the loan. 

25 ‘‘(C) CONTINUING AUTHORITY TO MOD26 IFY.—A borrower may elect to modify the interVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:34 Feb 07, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H649.IH H649

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 649 IH

1 est rate of a loan in accordance with subpara2 graph (A) at any time during the life of the 

3 loan.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 201

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment of both Houses.
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 201

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Wednesday, January 28, 1998, it stand ad4 journed until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, February 3, 1998;

5 that when the House adjourns on Thursday, February 5,
2

•HCON 201 EH

1 1998, it stand adjourned until 3:00 p.m. on Wednesday,

2 February 11, 1998; and that when the House adjourns

3 on Thursday, February 12, 1998, it stand adjourned until

4 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, February 24, 1998, or until noon

5 on the second day after Members are notified to reassem6 ble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution,

7 whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses

8 or adjourns at the close of business on Friday, February

9 13, 1998, pursuant to motion made by the Majority Lead10 er, or his designee, in accordance with this concurrent res11 olution, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Mon12 day, February 23, 1998, or such time on that day as may

13 be specified by the Majority Leader or his designee in the

14 motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second

15 day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to

16 section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs

17 first.

18 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

19 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

20 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead21 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House
3

•HCON 201 EH

1 and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

2 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Passed the House of Representatives January 27,

1998.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 10.1


 





AMENDMENT NUMBER 2

TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This Amendment (the “Amendment”),
dated December 6, 2017, to the Employment Agreement dated as of December 15, 2006, as amended November 1, 2012 (as so amended,
the “Agreement”), by and between Nathan’s Famous, Inc., a Delaware corporation, with its principal office located
at One Jericho Plaza, Jericho, New York 11753 (together with its successors and assigns permitted under this Agreement, “Nathan’s”),
and Howard M. Lorber who resides at 8061 Fischer Island, Miami, Florida 33109 (“Lorber”), is made by and among Nathan’s
and Lorber.


WITNESSETH:


WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the
Agreement in order to (i) increase the cash compensation of Lorber without additional grants of restricted shares and (ii) further
extend the termination date of the Agreement.


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the
premises and other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto agree as follows:


1.
Definitions. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Agreement.


2.
Amendment to Salary. Section 5 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:


Lorber shall receive from Nathan’s a salary, at the
rate of $1,000,000 per annum.


3.
Termination. Section 2(b) of the Agreement shall be amended by replacing “December 31, 2017” with “December
31, 2022.”


4.
Restricted Stock. The current language in Section 8(a) of the Agreement will be deleted.


5.
Limited Nature of Amendments and Waivers. The Amendment is limited as provided herein and does not extend to any
other provisions of the Agreement not specified herein nor to any other matter. Except as expressly amended hereby, the terms and
provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


6.
Effectiveness. This Amendment shall become effective as of January 1, 2018.


7.
Counterparts; Execution. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts and all such counterparts taken together
shall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument. Delivery of an executed counterpart of this Amendment by telefacsimile
or electronic mail shall be equally as effective as delivery of an original executed counterpart of this Amendment.


8.
Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the
State of New York, without reference to principles of conflict of laws.


[Signature page follows]









     


     


    




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have
executed this Amendment as of the day and year first written above.


	 	NATHAN’S FAMOUS, INC.
	 	 
	 	 
	 	By:	
        /s/ Eric Gatoff

	 	 	Name:	Eric Gatoff
	 	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer


 


 


	 	
        /s/ Howard M. Lorber

	 	Howard M. Lorber
#### Sharon R. CONNELLY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael J. BLOT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-1997

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 31, 2018

Decided: February 20, 2018

*259Glenn H. Silver, Erik B. Lawson, SILVER & BROWN, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellant. Timothy B. Hyland, David B. Deitch, Tyler Southwick, HARRIS, ST. LAURENT & CHAUDHRY LLP, Reston, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In this appeal regarding Appellee Sharon R. Connelly’s breach of contract action under Virginia law, we are called on to determine whether the Defendant, Michael J. Blot, orally agreed to modification of a promissory note, the applicable burden of proof to establish that the note was modified, whether the Virginia Statute of Frauds required a modification of the note to be in writing, the applicable statute of limitations, and whether Blot is equitably estopped from raising the statute of limitations defense.

The district court held a bench trial and in its memorandum of decision addressed each of the issues asserted on appeal, with one exception: the applicable burden of proof in demonstrating that there was mutual assent to the modification of the contract. When reviewing a judgment resulting from a bench trial, we examine conclusions of law de novo and factual findings for clear error. *Tatum v. RJR Pension Inv. Comm.,*761 F.3d 346, 357 (4th Cir. 2014). The court set down detailed reasoning in its memorandum of de-cisión. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, the joint appendix, and the memorandum of decision and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasons stated by the district court. *Connelly v. Blot,*No. 1:16-cv-01282-AJT-JFA, 2017 WL 6766825 (E.D. Va. Aug. 23, 2017).*

We dispensé with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*

*

**We further conclude that the court did not err in using a preponderance of the evidence standard. *See RF & P Corp.*v. *Little,*247 Va. 309, 440 S.E.2d 908, 914 (1994).
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Fell C. Herdeg, Chief Financial
Officer, of Trudy Corporation do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge
that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1) | The Companys Quarterly
 Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, being filed with the
 Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
 requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
 1934, as amended; and
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | 2) | The information
 contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
 financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                           

This Certification
accompanies this Form 10-Q as an exhibit, but shall not be deemed as having
been filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or
as a separate disclosure document of the Company or the certifying officer.

|                      |                         |                   
|--------------------- | ----------------------- | ------------------
|Date: January 4, 2010 | By:                     | /s/ Fell C. Herdeg
|                      |                         |                   
|                      | Fell C. Herdeg,        
|                      | Chief Financial Officer

---
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15
- 7883

CREADELL HUBBARD , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. CHARLES RATLEDGE, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke

. Glen E. Conrad , District Judge. ( 7:15

- cv
- 00599

- GEC

- RSB )

Submitted : December 21, 2018 Decided: January 10, 2019

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, HARRIS , Circuit Judge , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Vacated and remanded by un published per curiam opinion

.
Creadell Hubbard, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Creadell Hubbard ap peals from the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. The district court ruled that Hubbard’s challenge to his career
offender status w as not cognizable under § 2241 pursuant to In re Jones , 226 F.3d 328 (4th Cir. 2000). How ever, when it issued its decision, the district court did not have the
benefit of our decisions in United States v. Wheeler , 886 F.3d 415 (4th Cir. 2018) , and Lester v. Flournoy , 909 F.3d 708 (4th Cir. 2018). Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed
in form a pauperis, vacate the district court’s order , and remand for further consideration of Hubbard’s petition, including any relevant jurisdictional issues. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2013-NM-095-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                                GKN HOLDING CORP.


                  Pursuant to Section 242 of the General  Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware ("GCL"), it is hereby certified that:

                  1.  The  name  of  the  corporation  (hereinafter  called  the
"Corporation")  is GKN Holding Corp. The date on which the original  certificate
of incorporation of the Corporation was filed with the Secretary of State of the
State of Delaware was January 30, 1987.

                  2. The  certificate  of  incorporation  of the  Corporation is
hereby amended by deleting  paragraph  FIRST and in its stead  substituting  the
following:

                  "FIRST: The name  of  the  corporation  is  Research  Partners
International, Inc. ("Corporation")"

                  3. Except as otherwise  amended hereby,  the provisions of the
certificate of incorporation of the Corporation are in full force and effect.

                  4. The amendment to the certificate of incorporation  has been
duly adopted in  accordance  with the  provisions  of Section 242 of the GCL, by
resolution of the Board of Directors of the Corporation and by affirmative  vote
of the  holders of a majority  of the  outstanding  securities  entitled to vote
thereon at a meeting of stockholders.

                  IN  WITNESS   WHEREOF,   the   undersigned   has  signed  this
Certificate  of  Amendment  on this  15th day of July  1998 and  affirms,  under
penalties of perjury,  that the  Certificate of Amendment is the act and deed of
the Corporation and the facts stated herein are true.



                                       /s/ Peter R. Kent
                                       --------------------------------
                                       Peter R. Kent, Executive Vice
                                       President, Chief Operating Officer
                                        and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
Exhibit
32.2
  CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  In
connection with the Amended Annual Report of Great East Bottles & Drinks
(China) Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge:
  
 (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period
certified.
 
 
 Signed on
this February 10, 2010
 
 /s/
      Danny PoonName:
      Danny PoonTitle:  Chief
      Financial Officer and Acting Principal Accounting
  Officer