alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.2


 


AMENDMENT TO BACKSTOP COMMITMENT AGREEMENT


 


This
Amendment (the “Amendment”) to Backstop Commitment Agreement dated December 6, 2017 (the “Agreement”),
is entered into as of December 12, 2017, by and between Reed’s Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and
Raptor/ Harbor Reeds SPV, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Raptor”). Capitalized terms used herein without
definition shall have the respective meanings set forth in the Agreement. In the event of an inconsistency between this Amendment
and the Agreement, this Amendment shall govern to the extent of such inconsistency.


 


WHEREAS, the Company
and Raptor have agreed to amend the Agreement as set forth herein, concurrently with the pricing reduction of the Company’s
Rights Offering as set forth in prospectus supplement no. 2 dated December 11, 2017 to the Prospectus; and


 


WHEREAS, the Company
and Raptor desire that all terms and provisions of the Agreement not specifically modified by this Amendment remain unaltered and
in full force and effect as written in the Agreement.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in
consideration of their mutual covenants and obligations contained herein, the Company and Raptor, agree as follows:


 


1. Backstop Commitment. Raptor agrees
to exercise, in the Rights Offering, it’s basic subscription right to the extent necessary to ensure the number of Backstop
Shares and Backstop Warrant Shares do not have the potential to exceed 6,000,000. Nothing contained in this Amendment will be construed
as limiting the number of subscription rights Raptor may exercise pursuant to its basic subscription right or over-subscription
privilege.


 


2. No Other Changes. Except as set forth
herein, all other terms and conditions contained in the Agreement that are not changed, amended or modified through this Amendment
shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.


 






    	 



     


    




 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
this Amendment has been duly executed by or on behalf of each of the parties as of the date first written above


 





	REED’S INC.,

                                                                                a
Delaware corporation

                                                                                 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/
    Valentin Stalowir	 	 	 
	Name:	Valentin Stalowir	 	 	 
	Its:	Chief Executive Officer	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	
        HOLDER:

         

        RAPTOR/HARBOR REEDS SPV,
        LLC

        a Delaware limited liability company

         

	 	 	 	By:	/s/
    Daniel J. Doherty III
	 	 	 	Name:	Daniel J. Doherty III
	 	 	 	Its:	Authorized Signatory
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial MortgageSecurities Corp. 

383 Madison Avenue

31st Floor

New York, New York 10179

 

Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2014-C25, CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-C25

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of November 1, 2014 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer'sknowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
# Official Journal C 355/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 355 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6516 September 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 355

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6516 September 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 355/01 | Commission Notice on the implementation of food safety management systems covering Good Hygiene Practices and procedures based on the HACCP principles, including the facilitation/flexibility of the implementation in certain food businesses | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 355/01

Commission Notice on the implementation of food safety management systems covering Good Hygiene Practices and procedures based on the HACCP principles, including the facilitation/flexibility of the implementation in certain food businesses

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
·~ NLJ. 08 L012 

2010115 PFOA Stewardship Pro~q\'r:·.· · -? :.'.: [.: 0-1 

DuPont Submission ll 1 ' ·- ' -

Document 

Date 

10.31.12 

10.31.12 

OPPT -2006-0621 

Index of Documents - Public Version 

Document 

Transmittal letter for report 

CBI 

October 31,2012 

Page 1 of 1 

Number of 

Pages 

1 

5 

10.31.12 Appendix D- Facility Report on Product 

Content - Aqueous Fluoropo1ymer Dispersion 5 

10.31.12 

10.31.12 

10.31.12 

10.31.12 

Appendix D- Facility Report on Product 

Content- Fluoroelastomers 

Appendix D- Facility Report on Product 

Content- Fluorotelomers 

Appendix F - Company Annual Report 

Summary of Reductions in Emissions and 

Product Content 

CBI (Attachments) 

IIIIJ!IIjiiiJIIIJ!i ~~~ ~~~ ~li \Ill~~~ ~II ~II I j II~ II Ill 

Company Sanitized 

6 

7 

3 

10 

COMPANY SANITIZED PUBLIC COPY OCTOBER 31,2012
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12
 
                        LORAL SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS LTD
 
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                         (In thousands, Except Ratios)
                                  (Unaudited)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                               NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                               SEPTEMBER 30, 1997
                                                                               ------------------
<S>                                                                            <C>
Earnings:
  Income before income taxes, minority interest and equity in net loss of
     affiliates.............................................................        $ 32,259
  Plus interest expense.....................................................          29,918
  Less capitalized interest.................................................          13,777
                                                                                     -------
Earnings available to cover fixed charges...................................        $ 48,400
                                                                                     =======
Fixed charges...............................................................        $(61,962)
                                                                                     =======
Deficiency of earnings to cover fixed charges...............................        $(13,562)
                                                                                     =======
</TABLE>
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00197-CR

ERIC ROMO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from Criminal District 

Court No. 4

of Tarrant County (1154083)

March 14, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice 

Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in the trial court’s judgment. The judgment is modified to delete 

reparations in the amount of $2,395. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial court 

is affirmed as modified.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

 Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A1386. PHILLIP CONNELL v. FARMERS AND MERCHANTS BANK.

Phillip Connell filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s orders compelling

arbitration, denying his motion for leave to file counterclaims, and denying his

motion to compel the production of documents. Although the order directing the

parties to proceed to binding arbitration for all cross claims is labeled “Final Order,”

it is clear that no actual final order has been entered in the case. The orders that

Connell wishes to appeal are interlocutory in nature. See Goshayeshi v. Mehrabian,

232 Ga. App. 81, 82 (501 SE2d 265) (1998) (order compelling arbitration is a nonfinal ruling); Johnson & Johnson v. Kaufman, 226 Ga. App. 77, 78 (485 Se2d 525)

(1997) (discovery orders generally are interlocutory and not directly appealable as

final judgments). “A party seeking appellate review from an interlocutory order must

follow the interlocutory application procedure . . . , which includes obtaining a

certificate of immediate review fromthe trial court.” Pace Constr. Corp. v. Northpark

Assocs., 215 Ga. App. 438, 439 (450 SE2d 828) (1994);see also OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). 

Connell’s failure to follow the interlocutory appeal procedure deprives us of

jurisdiction over this appeal, which is therefore DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

04/16/2015

April 16, 2015
#### Mark Louis NELSON, Appellant v. Crystal Dawn STARK-NELSON, Appellee

NO. 03-14-00569-CV

Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin.

Filed: November 26, 2014

Michelle Lubbert, Tuck & Kizer Law Group, P.L.L.C., Bastrop, TX, for appellant.

Aleta Peacock, Law Office of Aleta Peacock, Bastrop, TX, for appellee.

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin

*MEMORANDUM OPINION*

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Appellant Mark Louis Nelson has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. His attorney has certified that the motion is not opposed. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. *See*Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).
H. Con. Res. 25 Agreed to May 8, 1997

One Hundred Fifth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-seven

Concurrent Resolution

Providing for acceptance of a statue of Jack Swigert, presented by the State of

Colorado, for placement in National Statuary Hall.

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That (a) the statue of Jack Swigert, furnished by the State

of Colorado for placement in National Statuary Hall in accordance

with section 1814 of the Revised Statutes of the United States

(40 U.S.C. 187), is accepted in the name of the United

States, and the thanks of the Congress are tendered to the State

of Colorado for providing this commemoration of one of its most

eminent personages.

(b) The State of Colorado is authorized to use the rotunda

of the Capitol on May 22, 1997, at 11 o’clock, ante meridiem,

for a presentation ceremony for the statue. The Architect of the

Capitol and the Capitol Police Board shall take such action as

may be necessary with respect to physical preparations and security

for the ceremony.

(c) The statue shall be displayed in the rotunda of the Capitol

for a period of not more than six months, after which period

the statue shall be moved to its permanent location in National

Statuary Hall.
H. Con. Res. 25—2

SEC. 2. The Clerk of the House of Representatives shall

transmit a copy of this concurrent resolution to the Governor of

Colorado.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
Exhibit 10.5


 


AMENDMENT
#1 TO THE CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE

ISSUED ON SEPTEMBER 21, 2017


 


THIS AMENDMENT #1
TO THE CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE ISSUED ON September 21, 2017 (the “Amendment”) is entered into as of December 4,
2017, by and between Nightfood Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and Labrys Fund, LP, a Delaware
limited partnership (the “Holder”) (collectively the “Parties”).


 


BACKGROUND


 


A. The Company and
Holder are the parties to that certain convertible promissory note originally issued by the Company to the Holder on September
21, 2017, in the original principal amount of $66,500.00 (the “Note”).


 


B. The Parties desire to amend
the Note as set forth expressly below.


 


NOW THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:


 


1. The
Holder waives its right to utilize its most favored nation provision in the Note with respect to the ability to effectuate a conversion
under the Note prior to the 180th calendar day after the Issue Date (as defined in the Note).


 


2. The
written consent of the Company shall be required for the Holder to effectuate any assignment of the Note to an unrelated third
party.


 


3. If the
Holder notifies the Company that its most favored nation provision has been triggered prior to the 180th calendar day after the
Issue Date, then the Company shall have seven (7) business days to cure such triggering event by repaying the Note in full pursuant
to the terms of the Note.


 


4. If an
event of default is perceived by the Holder, Holder must notify the Company of such default or perceived default, and allow the
Company five (5) business days to cure such default by repaying the Note in full pursuant to the standard terms of the note. The
default provisions shall not apply during this period of five (5) business days, but rather the standard prepayment provisions
shall apply. This cure period shall apply for all default provisions except Sections 3.1 and 3.2 of the Note.


 


5. This
Amendment shall be deemed part of, but shall take precedence over and supersede any provisions to the contrary contained in the
Note. Except as specifically modified hereby, all of the provisions of the Note, which are not in conflict with the terms of this
Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect.


 


[Signature page to follow]


 




     

     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment
as of the date first above written.


 


	Nightfood Holdings, Inc.	 	Labrys Fund, LP
	 	 	 
	By: 	/s/ Sean Folkson	 	By: 	/s/
    Thomas Silverman
	Name: Sean Folkson	 	Name: Thomas Silverman
	Title: Chief Executive Officer	 	Title: Managing Member
U

.S

. Department of T ransportation Federal Aviation Administration 

## NOV 052015

Mr. Charly Gaber Gulfstream Aerospace LP P.O. Box 1036 Airport City, 70100 Israel

Dear Mr. Gaber: Transport Airplane Directorate 1601 lind Avenue , S

.W. Renton , Washington 98057-3356

We have received your letter number FAA/15220/CG, dated July 30, 2015, on behalf of Gulfstream Aerospace LP (GALP) , requesting a one-year extension to time-limited exemption no. 10408 , presently set to expire December 19,2015 , regarding§ 25.901(c) of Title 14, Code ofFederal Regulations. You request to extend this time-limited exemption would allow the engine manufacturer to address issues testing has identified, and to meet the conditions ofthe exemption as those conditions apply to FADEC software design approval on GALP Model G280 airplanes and related engine installations. Your petition is published in 

### regulations

.gov in docket no. FAA-20 11-0686

. We are in the process ofreviewing your extension request, and will contact you ifwe need additional information

. The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary ofthe petition in the 

### Federal Register for public comment because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a precedent, no public comments were received on the original petition, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to GALP G280 tleet operations. If you have any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, please contact Chris R. Parker at 425-227-1509 , or e-mail , chris.r.parker@ faa.gov. Sincerely,

Mark Forseth Transport Airplane Directorate Aircraft Certification Service Federal Aviation Administration
# AVS

Quality Management System Title: Domestic New Action Wor1<sheetwith 58 QPM# AIR-ANM-030-F7 Date: December 17, 2008 Revision 1 

# Record ofContacts 2-0l0-

# 0t.l/l FDMS Docket No. FAA-i!OO""

_ With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA. etc.)?

Organization Person Contacted Date Boeing (AR) John 0'im) Rudkin 5/27/2010 ATA Joe White 512712010

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED Check the Master Ust to Verify Thai This is the Correct Revision Before Use
Exhibit 10.1





 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO 


AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF REAL
ESTATE


 


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT
TO AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF REAL ESTATE (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into this 30th
day of November, 2017, by and between Raceland QSR, LLC, a Louisiana limited liability company (“Seller”), and Seediv,
LLC, a Louisiana limited liability company (“Buyer”), for the purpose of amending that certain Agreement for Purchase
and Sale of Real Estate, dated October 4, 2017, by and between Seller and Buyer (the “Purchase Agreement”). Capitalized
terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Purchase Agreement.


 


Recitals


 


WHEREAS, the parties
hereto desire to amend certain provisions of the Purchase Agreement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the foregoing premises and representations, warranties, covenants and agreements contained herein, and for other
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound
hereby, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:


 


1.       The
first sentence of Section 9 is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 


          The Closing of the purchase
and sale of the Property (the “Closing”) shall take place in escrow on or before the date which is ninety (90)
calendar days after the expiration of the Feasibility Period (the “Closing Date”).


 


2.       Except
as expressly provided herein, the Purchase Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 


3.       This
Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts and delivered electronically, each of which shall be deemed to be an original,
but all of which together shall constitute one and the same agreement.


 


4.       The
Amendment shall be governed in all respects by the laws in effect in the State of Florida, without regard to the principles of
conflicts of law, and for all purposes shall be construed in accordance with such laws.


 


[Remainder of page intentionally left
blank]







 




     


     


    

  


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement under seal the day and year first above written.


 


	 	SELLER:
	 	 
	 	RACELAND QSR, LLC


 


	 	By:	/s/ Seenu G. Kasturi
	 	 	Seenu G. Kasturi
	 	 	Manager


 


	 	BUYER:
	 	 
	 	SEEDIV, LLC


 


	 	By:	/s/ Richard W. Akam
	 	 	Richard W. Akam
	 	 	Chief Executive Officer


 








    	 	2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2989
BONITA DOROTHY SACILOTTO, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BALTIMORE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Precinct II; SERGEANT MENTZER; JAMES JOHNSON, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-2416-JFM) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: January 31, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bonita Dorothy Sacilotto, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Allan Fry, Assistant Solicitor, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to relief under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The districtcourt entered its order on June 27, 1995; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on November 6, 1995. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this court of jurisdiction to consider this case. Accordingly, we grant Appellees' motion and dismiss the appeal. We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

 

The certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

 

May 12, 2004

 

Bruce N. Warner, the Chief Financial Officer ofNorthern California Bancorp, Inc. certifies:

 

3.     that this periodic reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

4.     that information contained inthis periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Northern California Bancorp, Inc..

 
|   | /s/ Bruce N.  Warner         |   |
|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|   | Bruce N. Warner              |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer and |
|   | Principal Accounting Officer |

 

1

----