# Certificat e o f Servic e

I hereb y certif

y that I hav e thi s day serve dth e foregoin g ANSWE Rt o o n th e followin g person s a t th e followin g addresse s b y Certifie dMail : Offic e o f th e Chie f Counse l Attention : FA

A Par t 1 6 Airpor t Proceeding s Docket , AGC-61 0 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Ave. , SW . Washington , D C 2059 1 Christin e E . Klein ^

AA E Deput yCommissione rfo rAviatio n an d Actin g Airpor t Directo r Te d Steven s Anchorag e Internationa l Airpor t 

### PO Bo x 19696 0 Anchorage , A K99519-696 0 P : (907 ) 269-072 4 E : Christine.klein@)alaska.go v

rtl l 

## Date dthi s 16 ^ day o f

December , 2009 . iau n Debenha m Member , Debenha m Properties , LL C Managin g Membe ro f RDM , LL C 296 0 C Street , Suit e 20 2 Anchorage , A K9950 3 W : (907 ) 562-933 0 F : (907 ) 562-933 1 E : shaundebenham@alaska.ne t

### ANSWE R t o MOTIO N T O DISMIS S Decembe r16 , 200 9 Offic e o f th e Chie f Counse l Attention : FA

A Par t 1 6 Airpor t Proceeding s Docket , AGC-61 0 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Ave. , SW . Washington , D C 2059 1 

### Docke t No . 16-09-1 4

ANSWE R t o MOTIO N T O DISMIS S RDM , LL C v . Te d Steven s Anchorag e Internationa l Airpor t 

# ANSWE R RDM , LL C (RDM ) ask s tha t th e Directo rden yth e MOTIO N T O DISMIS S file d b yth e Stat e o f Alaska , Departmen t o f Transportatio n an d Publi c Facilities , Te d Steven s Anchorag e Internationa l Airpor t (TSAIA) . Th e Stat e o f Alaska , Departmen t o f Transportatio n an d Publi c Facilities , Te d Steven s Anchorag e Internationa l Airpor t (TSAIA ) use s a s it s justificatio n fo rdismissa l th e followin g tw o reasons : 1 ) "RDM , LLC , ha s no t shown , an d canno t show , tha t i t wa s "directl yan d substantiall yaffected " b yan yactio n allege d o ractuall ydon e b yANC , a s i s require d fo rstandin g unde r1 4 C.F.R . §16.23 ; an d 2 ) A t root , th e complain t challenge s contrac t term s agree d t o b yth e compan yi n whic h RD M wa s a minorit yinvestor , whic h term s ar e no t a prope r subjec t fo rrevie w unde rPar t 16. " TSAI A i s wron g o n bot h accounts . I t woul d appea rtha t ther e i s a misinterpretatio n b yTSAI A o f th e Airpor t an d Airwa yImprovemen t Ac t o f 1982 , a s amended , 4 9 U.S.C . §47101 , e t se q an d th e accompanyin g Titl e 4 9 Unite d State s Cod e §4710 7 (a ) Genera l Writte n Assurance . Whic h misinterpretatio n ha s pu t TSAI A i n th e situatio n i n whic h i t no w find s itself . Belo w ar e explanation s wh yth e FAA Directo rshoul d den yTSAIA' s MOTIO N TO DISMISS . 

## Sectio n 1 . Proo f tha t RD M wa s "directl yan d substantiall y affected " RD M documente d a d nausea m i n it s complain t 1 ) RDM' s positio n a s a membe ro f AGLA D Postmark , LL C an d 2 ) TSAIA' s violation s o f Titl e 4 9 Unite d State s Cod e §4710 7 (a ) Genera l Writte n Assuranc e whic h lea d directl yt o th e failur e o f AGLAD' s developmen t an d th e resultan t los s o f ove r$3 M o f whic h RD M directl ylos t mor e tha n $1.3M . However , RD M wil l revie w th e majo rpoint s outline d i n it s complaint . Fo ra mor e complet e revie w o f TSAIA' s Titl e 4 9 violation s pleas e refe rt o RDM' s complaint .

RD M V . TSAI A - Pag e 1 o

f 8

### ANSWE R t o MOTIO N T O DISMIS S Revie w o f Majo rPoints : 1 . Th e plannin g an d developmen t o f Te d Steven s Anchorag e Internationa l Airpor t ha s bee n financed , i n part , wit h fund s provide d b yth e FAA unde rth e Airpor t Improvemen t Progra m (AIP) , authorize d b yth e Airpor t an d Airwa yImprovemen t Ac t o f 1982 , a s amended , 4 9 U.S.C . §47101 , etseq . 2 . A s such , TSAI A mus t compl ywit h Titl e 4 9 Unite d State s Cod e §4710 7 (a ) Genera l Writte n Assurances . 3 . AGU\ D Postmark , LL C (AGLAD ) signe d a leas e wit h TSAI A o n Novembe r18 , 2005 . 4 . RDM , LL C i s a membe ro f AGLA D Postmark , LLC . (Se e Exhibi t A RD M Complain t Date d Octobe r27 , 2009. ) 5 . No t onl yi s RDM , LL C a 31.8 % owne ro f AGLA D Postmark , LL C bu t the yar e als o "deeme d t o hav e a 51 % Percentag e Interes t i n th e Compan yfo rvotin g purposes" . Thi s allow s RD M greate rcontro l ove rAGLA D Postmar k tha n depicte d i n TSAIA' s MOTIO N T O DISMISS . (Exhibi t A , pgs . 1-2 ) 6 . RD M contribute d approximatel y$1.3 M t o th e AGLA D development . 7 . Althoug h RD M initiall ywa s no t th e "contac t person " wit h TSAIA , RD M wa s a ver y activ e membe ro f AGLA D Postmark , LL C an d worke d closel ywit h Le e Nun n an d Caro l Meyer s o n th e AGLA D development . Additionally , i n th e fal l o f 200 8 RD M too k a ver yactiv e rol e i n th e AGLA D developmen t whe n the ysecure d a n Optio n t o purchas e al l o f AGLAD , Inc.' s interes t i n AGLA D Postmark , LLC . RD M me t severa l time s wit h TSAI A (Octobe r 14 , 2008 , Octobe r28 , 2008 , an d Novembe r17 , 2008 ) t o discus s extendin g AGLAD' s leas e deadlin e an d TSAI A hel p wit h financing . I n advanc e o f th e Octobe r28 , 200 8 meeting , TSAI A requeste d tha t RD M provid e a cop yo f th e Optio n Agreemen t (se e Exhibi t B) . RD M wa s tol d b yTSAI A tha t the ywoul d no t mee t wit h RD M unles s the yha d proo f tha t RD M ha d authorit y t o ac t o n behal f o f AGLA D Postmark , LLC . Onc e th e Optio n Agreemen t wa s provided , TSAI A deeme d th e Optio n Agreemen t a s satisfactio n o f thei r requiremen t an d proceede d t o mee t wit h RDM . Th e assertio n tha t RD M i s a mino rpartne rwit h mino rinpu t i s simpl ywrong . 8 . TSAI A violate d Titl e 4 9 Unite d State s Cod e §4710 7 (a ) Genera l Writte n Assuranc e by : a . Insertin g a "financial " obligatio n int o AGLAD' s leas e whic h ha d no t bee n include d i n othe rTSAI A tenan t leases . b . No t ignorin g o rsubstantiall yextendin g AGLA D leas e obligation s t o th e degre e tha t CargoPor t receive d extensions . c . Failin g t o significantl yexten d AGLAD' s leas e i n ligh t o f th e terribl e world/nationa l recession . CargoPor t receive d thi s concessio n i n 199 8 fo r lik e cause . d . Failin g t o gran t a longe rinitia l ter m i n whic h t o complet e Phas e I improvements . CargoPor t receive d thi s concession . e . Failin g t o allo w AGLA D t o defaul t o n onl yon e o f it s parcel s instea d o f al l th e parcel s whe n AGLA D wa s foun d i n defaul t fo rno t providin g proo f o f

RD M V . TSAI A - Pag e 2 o

f 8

### ANSWE R t o MOTIO N T O DISMIS S financin g fo rPhas e I . CargoPort' s an d FedEx' s parcel s wer e treate d individuall yno t collectively . f . No t givin g AGLA D ren t deferra l unti l improvement s wer e substantiall y complete . CargoPor t an d FedE xreceive d thi s concession . g . No t grantin g AGLA D th e abilit yt o pa ybac k deferre d ren t ove rtw o years . FedE xreceive d thi s concession . h . Failin g t o provid e AGLA D wit h fre e "fill " materia l fo rit s sit e development . FedE xan d UP S receive d thi s concession . i . Failin g t o provid e AGLA D th e abilit yt o sel l it s improvement s t o TSAI A an d leas e bac k

th e improvement s a s a mechanis m t o receiv e favorabl e financing . CargoPor t receive d thi s concession . j . Denyin g AGLA D th e abilit yt o us e Firs t Righ t o f Refusal s fo rthei r development . UP S an d FedE xreceive d thi s concession . k . Denyin g AGLA D "Preferentia l Use " o f hardstand s P-1 , P-2 , an d P-3 . UP S receive d thi s concession . I . No t givin g AGLA D th e righ t t o ren t th e P-1 , P-2 , an d P- 3 hardstand s a t a lo w rate . FedE xreceive d thi s concession . m . Makin g AGLA D pa yfo rtaxiwa yconstruction , maintenance , an d operation . CargoPort , UPS , an d FedE xreceive d thi s concession . n . Makin g AGLA D pa yfo rsit e civi l wor k fo rthei rdevelopment . FedE x receive d thi s concession . o . Makin g AGLA D pa yfo rhanga rconstruction . FedE xreceive d thi s concession . p . Economicall yundercuttin g AGLAD' s developmen t b ydecreasin g TSAIA' s fe e fo rparkin g carrier s a t thei rhardstand s fro m $17 9 pe rfou rhou rsto p t o $88.52 , a 51 % decrease . q . Transferrin g AGLAD' s wetland s permi t t o TSAI A withou t compensation . 9 . TSAIA' s violation s o f Titl e 4 9 Unite d State s Cod e §4710 7 (a ) Genera l Writte n Assuranc e "directl yan d substantiall yaffected " th e AGLA D development . I n fact , i t lea d directl yt o th e failur e o f th e development . 10 . RD M ( a membe ro f AGLA D Postmark , LLC ) los t approximatel y$1.3 M becaus e o f TSAIA' s violations , an d henc e ha s bee n "directl yan d substantiall yaffected" . 1 1 . RDM' s standin g i s ensure d b y1 4 C.F. R Par t 1 6 §16.23(a ) whic h reads , " A perso n directl yan d substantiall yaffecte d b yan yallege d noncomplianc e ma yfil e a complain t wit h th e Administrator . A perso n doin g busines s wit h a n airpor t an d payin g fee s o rrental s t o th e airpor t shal l b e considere d directl yan d substantiall y affecte d b yallege d revenu e diversio n a s define d i n 4 9 U.S.C . 4710 7 (b). " 12 . O n pag e 46 , Sectio n 4 o f Ji m Marty n v . Por t o f Anacortes . Washingto n (Docke t No . 16-02-03 ) th e FAA expand s o n 1 4 C.F. R Par t 1 6 §16.23(a) . "Th e secon d sentenc e o f thi s sectio n doe s no t exclud e previou s o rpotentia l airpor t user s wh o d o no t hav e currentl yfee-payin g arrangement s wit h a n airpor t fro m fillin g complaint s unde rPar t 16 . Rather , i t confirm s tha t a complainan t presentl y engage d i n a busines s arrangemen t wit h th e airpor t i n questio n woul d b e assume d t o suffe rfro m a direc t an d substantia l effec t whe n revenu e diversio n i s allege d withou t havin g t o demonstrat e tha t effect . Thi s poin t relate d directl yt o 17.2 3 (b)(4 ) tha t require s a complain t file d unde rPar t 1 6 t o contai n a descriptio n o f ho w th e complainan t wa s directl yan d substantiall yaffecte d b yth e thing s don e RD M V . TSAI A - Pag e 3 o

f 8

### ANSWE R t o MOTIO N T O DISMIS S

o romitte d t o b e don e b yth e respondents . Allegation s relate d t o revenu e diversio n d o no t requir e th e complainan t t o describ e ho w i t wa s directl yan d substantiall yaffected . [See , e.g . Rule s o f Practic e fo rFederally-Assiste d Airpor t Proceedings , Fina l Rule , 6 1 Fed . Reg . 5399 8 (Oct . 16 , 1996).] " "Th e fac t tha t th e Complainan t i s no t currentl ypayin g fee s o rrental s t o th e Anacorte s Airpor t doe s no t preclud e hi m fro m bein g directl yan d substantiall y affecte d b yan yallege d noncompliance . Th e Complainan t mus t mee t th e requirement s o f §16.23(b)(4 ) b yprovidin g a brie f descriptio n o f ho w h e wa s affected. " Th e FA A state s her e tha t i n orde rt o hav e standing , th e Complainan t need s onl y t o mee t th e requirement s o f §16.23(b)(4 ) b yprovidin g a brie f descriptio n o f ho w h e wa s affected . RD M ha s me t thi s standard . O n page s 9-2 0 o f th e Complaint , RD M describe s ho w the ywer e "directl yan d substantially " affecte d b yTSAIA' s gran t assuranc e violations . 

## Sectio n 2 . Contrac t term s ar e no t a prope rsubjec t fo rrevie w unde rPar t 16 . A s documente d i n RDM' s complaint , th e plannin g an d developmen t o f Te d Steven s Anchorag e Internationa l Airpor t ha s bee n financed , i n part , wit h fund s provide d b y th e FA A unde rth e Airpor t Improvemen t Progra m (AIP) , authorize d b yth e Airpor t an d Airwa yImprovemen t Ac t o f 1982 , a s amended , 4 9 U.S.C . §47101 , e t seq . Belo w i s a n explanatio n o f wh ycontrac t term s ar e a prope rsubjec t fo rrevie w unde r Par t 16 : 1 . Becaus e th e plannin g an d developmen t o f TSAI A ha s bee n financed , i n part , wit h fund s provide d b yth e FAA unde rth e Airpor t Improvemen t Progra m (AIP) , authorize d b yth e Airpor t an d Airwa yImprovemen t Ac t o f 1982 , a s amended , 4 9 U.S.C . §47101 , e t seq , TSAI A mus t compl ywit h Titl e 4 9 Unite d State s Cod e §4710 7 (a ) Genera l Writte n Assurances . 2 . TSAIA' s requiremen t t o compl ywit h Genera l Writte n Assuranc e i s no t tenan t specific . Meaning , TSAI A ca n no t willfull ycompl ywit h al l Genera l Writte n Assurance s fo ron e tenan t an d the n decid e t o compl yonl ywit h a selec t numbe r o f Genera l Writte n Assurance s fo ranothe rtenant . TSAI A mus t compl ywit h a M Genera l Writte n Assurance s wit h regard s t o al l tenants , regardles s o f wh o th e tenan t is , ho w impressiv e thei rbalanc e shee t is , o rho w man yflight s the ymigh t brin g t o Anchorage , Alaska . 3 . Specifically , TSAI A mus t compl ywit h Genera l Writte n Assuranc e 22 , "Economi c Nondiscrimination. " FAA Orde r5190.6 A "describe s th e responsibilitie s unde r Assuranc e 2 2 assume d b yth e owner s o f public-us e airport s develope d wit h Federa l assistance . Amon g thes e i s th e obligatio n t o trea t i n a unifor m manne r thos e user s makin g th e sam e o rsimila rus e o f th e airpor t an d t o mak e al l airpor t facilitie s an d service s availabl e o n reasonabl e term s withou t unjus t discrimination. " [Se e Order , Sees . 4-14(a)(2 ) an d 3-1 ] Also , "Th e owne ro f an y airpor t develope d wit h Federa l gran t assistanc e i s require d t o operat e th e airpor t fo rth e us e an d benefi t o f th e publi c an d t o mak e i t availabl e t o al l types , kind s an d classe s o f aeronautica l activit yo n reasonabl e terms , an d withou t unjus t discrimination. " [Se e Order , Sec . 4-13(a). ] 4 . Additionally , TSAI A mus t compl ywit h Genera l Writte n Assuranc e 23 , "Exclusiv e Rights. " FAA Orde r5190.6 A states , "w e hav e take n th e positio n tha t th e RD M V . TSAI A - Pag e 4 o

f 8

### ANSWE R t o MOTIO N T O DISMIS S applicatio n o f an yunreasonabl e requiremen t o ran ystandar d tha t i s applie d i n a n unjustl ydiscriminator ymanne rma yconstitut e th e constructiv e gran t o f a n exclusiv e righ t t o th e entit yo rentitie s no t subjec t t o th e sam e requirement s o r standards. " 5 . Whe n AGLA D Postmark , LL C negotiate d it s groun d leas e wit h TSAI A i n 200 5 i t di d s o wit h th e belie f tha t TSAI A wa s negotiatin g i n goo d fait h an d wa s no t violatin g an ylaw s o rpolicy . Ha d AGLA D know n tha t TSAIA' s propose d leas e term s (se e abov e TSAI A violation s i n Sectio n 1. 8 o n pag e 2 ) wer e i n violatio n o f Titl e 4 9 Unite d State s Cod e §4710 7 (a ) Genera l Writte n Assurances , AGLA D woul d hav e negotiate d it s groun d leas e differentl yo rma yno t hav e entere d int o a leas e a t all . 6 . Whe n AGLA D Postmark , LL C negotiate d wit h TSAI A pos t 200 5 (onc e i t ha d a signe d leas e wit h TSAIA ) i t di d s o agai n wit h th e belie f tha t TSAI A wa s negotiatin g i n goo d fait h an d wa s no t violatin g an ylaw s o rpolicy . Ha d AGI_A D know n tha t TSAIA' s tactic s (se e abov e TSAI A violation s i n Sectio n 1. 8 o n pag e 2 ) wer e i n violatio n o f Titl e 4 9 Unite d State s Cod e §4710 7 (a ) Genera l Writte n Assurance s AGLA D woul d hav e negotiate d differently . 7 . Finally , i n Maxi m United . LL C v . Boar d o f Count yCommissioner s o f Jefferso n County . Colorad o (Docke t No . 16-01-10 ) th e Boar d o f Count yCommissioner s o f Jefferso n Count , Colorad o (County ) argue d that , "Maxi m voluntaril ysigne d a leas e containin g th e exac t languag e abou t whic h i t no w complains , an d wit h knowledg e tha t ther e wa s n o guarante e tha t th e ne w minimu m standard s woul d b e complete d a t an ygive n time . No w tha t th e leas e term s hav e becom e inconvenient , Maxi m ask s tha t FA A t o interven e an d forc e th e Count yt o amen d thos e terms . Suc h a challeng e t o th e propriet yo f th e County' s requirements , i f eve rappropriate , shoul d hav e bee n brough t prio rt o signin g th e lease. " (Pg . 6 , paragrap h 6 ) Th e County' s wordin g an d argumen t i s ver ysimila rt o TSAIA' s wordin g foun d o n pag e 4 lin e 2 o f th e MEMORANDU M I N SUPPOR T O F MOTIO N T O DISMISS . Thi s paragrap h states , "AGLA D entere d int o th e leas e voluntaril yan d voluntaril y agree d t o eac h modificatio n b ysupplement . A t an ypoint , AGLA D coul d hav e take n advantag e o f th e right s o f administrativ e protes t an d appea l o f an yAN C leas e requiremen t o rdecisio n unde r1 7 AA C 42.91 0 an d 1 7 AA C 42.920 . Unti l th e leas e wa s terminated , AGLA D di d no t avai l itsel f o f thes e remedies . Havin g faile d t o avai l itsel f o f administrativ e remedies , AGLA D accepte d thos e decision s a s a matte ro f law . RD M no w alleges , incorrectly , tha t AN C treate d othe rtenant s differentl yi n th e past . Bu t ANC' s mer e enforcemen t o f th e leas e contrac t AGLA D voluntaril yentere d int o canno t b e a prope rbasi s fo ra clai m tha t AN C thereb y violate d federa l obligation s tha t directl yan d substantiall yaffecte d RDM. " Late ro n pag e 5 lin e 1 1 i t states , "Ever yagreemen t ter m betwee n Responden t an d AGLA D wa s entere d int o voluntaril yan d withou t reserve d objectio n b y AGLAD . AGLAD' s Lan d Leas e Agreemen t ADA-3117 0 an d it s supplement s substantiall yframe d an d governe d th e relationshi p betwee n Responden t an d AGLAD . Althoug h RD M assert s tha t th e term s t o whic h AGLA D agree d wer e les s favorabl e tha n th e term s o f Respondent' s leas e agreement s wit h certai n othe r tenants , i t ignore s th e fac t tha t AGLA D voluntaril ybecam e boun d t o thos e term s b ycontract. " An d finall ylate ri n th e paragraph , lin e 20 , "Ha d AGLA D believe d th e term s t o b e i n violatio n o f th e Gran t Assurances , AGLA D shoul d hav e challenge d the m i n advance , whethe rbefor e th e FA A o rb yth e Stat e o f Alaska' s administrativ e RD M V . TSAI A - Pag e 5 o

f 8

### ANSWE R t o MOTIO N T O DISMIS S proces s unde r1 7 AC C 42.910 . RD M shoul d no t no w b e permitte d (to ) see k t o hol d Responden t accountabl e unde rth e Gran t Assurance s fo rterm s AGLA D wa s comfortabl e enterin g into , an d RD M wa s comfortabl e authorizin g AGLA D t o ente r into. " I n sectio n V.A. I (pg . 18 ) o f Maxi m United , LL C v . Boar d o f Count yCommissioner s o f Jefferso n County . Colorad o (Docke t No . 16-01-10 ) th e FAA determines , "Eve n thoug h th e recor d support s tha t th e Complainan t ma yhav e agree d t o leas e term s restrictin g self-fuelin g unti l suc h time s a s th e revise d minimu m standard s ar e adopte d an d implemented , w e canno t suppor t th e County' s position . Th e leas e term s i n questio n ar e inconsisten t wit h th e Respondent' s gran t assuranc e 22(f) , whic h provide s tha t th e owne rshal l hav e th e righ t t o self-servic e it s ow n aircraft . Th e leas e agreemen t doe s no t supersed e th e Respondent' s Federa l obligatio n t o permi t self-fueling . Th e Responden t canno t avoi d it s Federa l obligatio n b ysecurin g a n agreemen t t o th e contrar yfro m th e tenant , whe n tha t agreemen t i s require d a s a conditio n o f reasonabl e acces s t o th e airport. " (Italic s adde d fo remphasis. ) TSAIA' s assertio n tha t AGLA D voluntaril ysigne d thei rleas e an d thi s shoul d excus e TSAI A fro m complianc e wit h Genera l Writte n Assurance s o rfedera l la w i s no t correct . Th e abov e mentione d cas e debunk s thi s theory . I n th e fal l o f 2005 , AGLA D wa s presente d wit h a leas e o n a "tak e i t o rleav e it " basis . AGLA D wa s no t awar e a t th e tim e tha t TSAI A ha d give n muc h mor e favorabl e term s t o othe rsimila rtenant s a t th e airport . A s mentione d previously , AGLA D wa s operatin g unde rth e expectatio n tha t TSAI A wa s negotiatin g i n goo d faith , an d wa s i n complianc e wit h al l law s an d policy . Ha d AGLA D bee n mad e awar e tha t othe rsimila rtenant s ha d receive d muc h mor e favorabl e term s an d tha t TSAI A wa s unde rth e obligatio n t o offe rthes e favorabl e term s withou t discriminatio n pe rTitl e 4 9 Unite d State s Cod e §4710 7 (a ) Genera l Writte n Assurances , AGLA D woul d hav e negotiate d differently . 8 . O n pag e 5 (lin e 16 ) o f th e MOTIO N TO DISMISS , TSAI A make s us e o f Roadhous e Aviation . LL C v . Cit yo f Tuls , FA A Docke t No . 16-05-0 8 t o augmen t th e argumen t tha t AGLA D voluntaril yentere d int o th e leas e an d accepte d thos e decision s a s a matte ro f la w an d therefor e th e complain t i s "no t a prope rsubjec t fo rrevie w unde rPar t 16. " I t cite s th e followin g sentenc e i n thi s cas e a s proo f tha t RDM' s complain t ha s n o merit . "FA A doe s no t normall yinterven e simpl ybecaus e a part y t o a contrac t late robject s t o a provisio n i n th e contract. " TSAI A shoul d hav e continue d readin g i n thi s paragraph , becaus e i n th e thir d sentenc e o f thi s sam e paragrap h i t states , "I n thi s case , th e Complainant' s allege d misunderstandin g o f th e leas e term s doe s no t ris e t o th e leve l o f a gran t assuranc e violation , bu t ma ya s th e Directo radvised , b e a stat e contrac t la w issue. " A readin g o f th e entir e cas e make s i t ver yclea rtha t th e reaso n th e Directo rdi d no t fin d th e Cit yo f Tul s a t faul t wa s no t becaus e Roadhous e Aviation , LL C agree d t o a leas e an d th e leas e mus t b e adhere d to , rather , th e Directo rmake s th e poin t tha t th e Cit yo f Tul s action s di d "no t ris e t o th e leve l o f a gran t assuranc e violation. " I f Roadhous e Aviation , LL C ha d bee n abl e t o sho w a violatio n o f a gran t assurance , th e Cit yo f Tul s woul d hav e bee n foun d liabl e regardles s o f th e fac t tha t Roadhous e Aviation , LL C voluntaril yagree d t o th e term s i n thei rlease . 9 . Finally , TSAI A make s th e assertio n tha t al l o f RDM' s claim s t o biase d treatmen t b yTSAI A occurre d onl ydurin g th e initia l leas e signin g i n 200 5 an d tha t onc e RD M V . TSAI A - Pag e 6 o

f 8

### ANSWE R t o MOTIO N T O DISMIS S AGLA D signe d it s leas e n o additiona l bia s existed . Thi s i s no t true . I n RDM' s complain t o n page s 9-20 , RD M list s twelv e instance s wher e TSAI A gav e mor e favorabl e treatmen t t o CargoPort , UP S and/o rFedEx . However , severa l o f thes e (number s 2 , 3 , 7 , 8 , an d 10 ) occurre d bot h durin g th e initia l leas e signin g an d afte ro rthe yoccurre d onl yafte rth e initia l leas e signing . a . Bia s # 2 & #3 : Unme t Leas e Obligation s O n Octobe r28 , 200 8 an d agai n o n Novembe r19 , 2008 , RD M me t wit h TSAI A t o reques t a n extensio n o f thei rleas e deadlin e fo rproo f o f financing . O n Novembe r 25 , 2008 , AGLA D sen t a n officia l lette rt o TSAI A agai n requestin g a n extension . A s documente d i n RDM' s complain t o n pag e 9 & 1 0 an d i n Exhibi t D , TSAI A routinel yignore d o rextende d leas e obligation s fo rCargoPort . I n particular , CargoPor t receive d a on e yea rextensio n i n 199 8 whe n th e globa l market s wer e i n recession . AGLAD' s reques t t o TSAI A fo ra lik e extensio n i n a fa rwors e recession , wa s give n a fla t denial . Thi s i s a n exampl e o f a violatio n o f gran t assurance s b yTSAI A tha t occurre d wel l afte rth e initia l leas e signing . b . Bia s #7 : TSAI A Ownershi p Assistanc e O n Octobe r28 , 2008 , RD M me t wit h TSAI A t o reques t assistanc e wit h financing . A t tha t tim e RD M specificall yaske d i f TSAI A coul d hel p wit h financin g b yownin g th e AGLA D development . RD M wa s tol d tha t thi s wa s no t possibl e becaus e TSAI A doe s no t participat e i n tha t manner . However , tha t i s no t true . A s documente d o n page s 1 3 & 1 4 o f RDM' s complain t an d i n Exhibi t I , TSAI A signe d a leas e wit h CargoPor t i n whic h TSAI A owne d th e developmen t an d lease d i t bac k t o CargoPort . Thi s allowe d CargoPor t t o secur e financin g fo rthei rdevelopment . Thi s i s a n exampl e o f a gran t assuranc e violatio n b yTSAI A tha t occurre d wel l afte rth e initia l leas e signing . c . Bia s #8 : Firs t Righ t o f Refusa l (FROR ) O n Octobe ro f 2005 , TSAI A sen t AGLA D a lette rdenyin g th e us e o f a FROR . However , FROR' s wer e grante d t o UP S an d FedEx . FROR' s ar e critica l tools . I t woul d hav e allowe d AGLA D t o initiall yleas e (o rlate rreduce ) a muc h smalle r amoun t o f lan d (an d henc e develo p a muc h smalle ramoun t o f land ) an d the n exercis e th e FROR' s a s marke t deman d drov e development . Thi s i s exactl yho w bot h UP S an d FedE xwer e abl e t o developmen t thei rproperties . Thi s i s ye t anothe rexampl e o f a gran t assuranc e violatio n b yTSAI A tha t occurre d wel l afte rth e initia l leas e signing . d . Bia s #10 : TSAI A Improvement s O n Octobe r28 , 2008 , RD M me t wit h TSAI A t o reques t assistanc e wit h financin g an d a n extensio n o f th e AGLA D financin g deadline . I n a n effor t t o ge t constructio n cost s down , durin g thi s meetin g RD M requeste d tha t TSAI A pa yfo r constructio n o f th e AGl_A D taxiway s an d t o mak e thes e "public " taxiways . However , RD M wa s informe d b yTSAI A tha t thi s wa s no t possible . A t tha t tim e RD M di d no t kno w tha t TSAI A ha d no t onl ypai d fo rth e taxiway s o f th e FedE x an d UP S development s bu t tha t TSAI A ha d als o pai d fo rsignifican t sit e improvement s fo rthes e developments . Thi s i s anothe rexampl e o f a gran t assuranc e violatio n b yTSAI A tha t occurre d wel l afte rth e initia l leas e signing . 

## Conclusio n

RD M V . TSAI A - Pag e 7 o f 8ANSWE R t o MOTIO N T O DISMIS S



### TSAIA' S MOTIO N T O DISMIS S shoul d b e denied . RD M ha s show n tha t i t wa s "directl y an d substantiall yaffected " b yTSAIA' s gran t assuranc e violation s an d thu s ha s standing . Additionally , RD M ha s show n tha t 1 ) TSAIA' s biase d treatment , unwittingl y agree d t o b yAGLA D a t th e tim e o f signin g th e initia l lease , doe s no t excus e TSAIA' s responsibilit yfro m complyin g wit h Genera l Writte n Assurances , an d 2 ) severa l o f TSAIA' s biase d treatment s occurre d afte rth e signin g o f th e initia l lease . Accordingly , th e MOTION T O DISMIS S shoul db e denied . Sincerely , Shau n Debenha m Member , Debenha m Properties , LL C Managin g Membe ro f RDM , LL C 296 0 C Street , Suit e 20 2 Anchorage , A K9950 3 W : (907 ) 562-933 0 F : (907 ) 562-933 1 E : shaundebenham(gialaska.ne t

RD M V . TSAI A - Pag e 8 o f 8

### Answe r ,oMo«ontoD-.s.iss-Exh.b>t A



## .mark , LL

C Operatm^i S votin g interes t ;,ppr.cabi e supportin g ^--^^^^^^ ^ T.le ^ AGLAD Pos '

RDM^ ' .TSAIA Exhibi t A-pag eAnswe rt o Motio n t o Dismis s - Exhibi t A 

### Applicabl e Supportin g Document s fo rproo f o f RD M 51 % votin g interes t AGLA D Postmark , LL C Operatin g Agreement : Pag e 3

Thi s paragrap h show s tha t

RD M ha da51 % interes t i n AGLA D Postmark , LL C fo r votin g "Member " mean s eac h perso n or entit y wh o execute s acounterpar

t of thi s Agreemen

t a s aMembe r andeach perso n o r

entit y wh o ma y hereafte r b e admitte dto th e Compan

y as a n additiona l or substitute dMember . "Ne t Appraise dValue " fo

r purpose s o

f determinin g tli e fai r market valu e of th e Company , an

dfo r puipose s o f

calculatin g th e fai

r marke t valu e o f aMember' s Percentag e Interes t in th e Company , will consis t o f tli e appraise

dvalu e o f tli e Project

determinedi

n lli e appraisa l conducte dunde

r th e provision s of

Sectio n 8.4 reduce

db y outstandin g liabilitie s o f

Ui e Company . - "Percentag e Interest " mean s each Member' s percentage interes t in th e Compan

y a s set fort h o n tli e attache dSchedul e 1 , a s adjuste diio mlim

e t o time i n accordanc e wit

h tlii s Agreement , includin g bu

t no t limite dto unde

r Sectio n 9.3 . "Preferre dRehim " means , wit h respect t o aMember

, th e retur n o f a n amoun t equa J t o tli e Member' s capita

l contributions , plu s acumulative retur n of 12 % pe r aimum , compounde d quarterly , on suc h Member' s capita l contribution s fromtim

e t o time during th e perio dto whic h th e Preferre dRetur

n relates , commencin g a s o f th e first date th e Membe

r make s acapita

l contributio n t o th e Compaiiy . '^Project " ha s th e meanin g se t fort h in Sectio n 1.3 . "RDM " mean s RDM , LLC . ."Regulation " include s temporar y an dfma l Treasur y regulation s promulgatedunde r th e Code an dth e correspondin g section s o f an y regulation s subsequentl

y issuedtha

t amen dor supersede suc h regulations .

ARTICL E 3 - MEMBERS , CONTRIBUTION S AN D INTEREST S 3. 1 Members'Names , Addresse s an dPercentages . Th e name s mi

daddresse s o f

the Members , andthei r

Percentag e Interest s ar

e se t fort h o n th e attachedSchedul e 1 , a s amended fromtim e t o time , provided , however , tha t RDM shal

l b e deeme dto hav e a51 % Percentag e Interes t i n th e Compan

y fo r votin g purpose s (bu

t not fo r purpose s o f

distribution s or

an y other purpose ) unti l th e las t

o f th e followin g event s (collectively , tiie "Obligations") ; (a) .Airpor t Stock , LL C ha s receive d$875,00 0 mdistribution s fromtlie Company , (b ) RDM ha s receive d distribution s fromth e Compan y equa l to al l of RDM' s Prefen-e

dRetur n o n it s initia

l capita l contribution s t o th e Company , and(c ) n o other fundin g o r guarantee s fromRDM or

it s affiliate s i s outstanding . 3. 2 Additiona l Members . Additiona l Member s shal l b e admitte donl

y upon th e consen t o f al l Members . 3. 3 Contributions . Eac h Membe r shall contribut

e a s his , he

r o r it s initia l capita l contributio n t o th e Compan y tli e cas h and/o r

propert y describedon attache dSchedul e 1 , a s AN C 79697v 5 30338- 3 «1!!9- 1 3

RD M V . TSAI A Exhibi t A - Pag e 2 o f 2Answe r t o Motio n t o Dismis s - Exhibi t 8 

# EXHIBI T B RDM , LL C Optio n Agreemen t wit h AGLAD , Inc .

Titl e pag e t o AGLA D Postmark , LL C OPTIO N AGREEMEN T Thi s Optio n Agreemen

t ("Agreement" ) i s mad

e an dentere dint

o a s o f tli c 18" ' da

y o f November , 200 8 b

y an damong RDM , LL

C ("RDM") , a

n Alaskalimite dliabilit

y company , an

d Anchorag e Globa

l Logistic s Airpar

k Development , Inc . ("AGLAD") , a n Alaskacorporation . RECITAL S WHEREAS , RD M hold s a n ownershi

p interes t i n AGLA D Postmark , LLC , a n Alaska limite dliabilit

y company (the "Company" ) equa l t o 32.28 % o f

tli e tota l outstandin g memberslii

p interest s i n th e Compan

y andAGLA

D hold s amembershi

p interes t equa l t o 67.72 % of

th e tota l outstandin g membershi p interest s i n th e Compan

y ("AGLAD' s Membe

r Interest") ; an

d WHEREAS , RD M desire s t o obtain , andAGLA

D desire s t

o convey to RDM , a

n option to purchas e AGLAD' s Membe r Interes t i n tli e Compan

y on the teun s andcondition s se t fortl i i n thi s Agreement ; NOW THEREFORE , i n consideratio n o f the premises , mutua

l covenant s an

d commitment s se

t fort h below , andothe

r goo dan dvaluabl e consideration , th e receip t an d adequac y o f

which ar e hereb y acknowledged , tlie partie s agree a s follows :

I . GRANT O FOPTIO N 1. 1 Subjec t

l b th e tenn s an

dcondition s se

t fort h i n thi s Agreement , th e AGLA D irrevocabl y grant s t o RD M an optio n to purchas e al l o f AGLAD' s Membe

r Interes t in th e Company a

t th e Purchas e Pric e describe diii Section 1 1 (the "Option") , whic h Purchas e Pric e shall , subjec t

to th e Holdbac k

Amoun t provision s o

f Section 3.4 , b e payabl e to AGLAD , ^^^. 2 Thi s Optio n i s exercisabl e b y RD M a t an y tim e durin g aperio dcommencing o n ll^Jat e o f

executio n o f

thi s Agreemen

t an dexpiring o

n Decembe

r 31 , 200 8 ("Optio n Period" ) ^^o n writte n notic e b y RDM delivere dto AGLA D ("Optio n Notice") . 1. 3 A s consideratio n fo r grantin g thi s Option , immediately upo n executio n of thi s Agreement , RD

M shal l mak

e a n efTor t t o bring th e project

ou t o f defaul t by paying th e bac

k leas e payments , payin g th e Novembe r an dDecembe

r ren t payment s when they come due an d fulfilling the"fmancia

l security " requirements , regarding sit e civi l wor

k fo r Stag e 1 , o

f th e Te d Steven s Internationa

l Airpor t or it s successo

r (the "Airport") . If

RD M determines , in it s sole discretion , tha

t i t i s unabl e to fuLftl

l such requirement s of

tlie Aiipori , RDM i s unde r n o obligatio n to continu e makin g groundleas e payments . II . PURCHAS E PRIC E Th e tota l amount payabl e by RD

M fo r al l of AGLAD' s Membe

r Interes t i s $400,000 , les s an y portio n o f

th e Holdbac k

Amoun t tha t AGLA D i s no t entitle dto (altogether , th e "Purchas e Price") . Optio n Agreemen

t Pag e 1 ofl 2

RD M V . TSAI A Exhibi t B - Pag e 1 o f 1 6Answe rt o Motio n t o Dismis s - Exhibi t B 

### RDM , LL C Optio n Agreemen t wit h AGl-AD , Inc .

Fo r purpose s of

thi s agreemen

t (including determining payment o f th e Holdbac

k Amount) ; (a

) th e ter m"Closin g Dat

e Liabilities " shall mea

n (i ) all unpai dliabilitie s o f th e Compan y due andpayabl e o n o r

befor e th e Closing Dale tha

t ar c liste din th e attache dto Exhibit A , a s supplemente db y AGLAD n o late r tha n fiv e day s afte r executio n of

thi s Agreement , an

d (ii ) t o the exten

t tlia t late fee s andinteres t

a s of Novembe r 14,200 8 o

f th e liabilitie s listedi

n Exhibi t A ar e materiall y disclose di

n Exhibit A as supplementedpursuant t o thi s Agreement , lat

e fee s an dinteres t accrue do n eac h suc h liabilit y afte r Novembe r 14 , 2008 ; and(b ) tli e ter

m "Undisclose dLiabilities " shal l mea n all othe r unpaidCompan

y liabilities , includuig , wiUiou t limitation , contrac t

obligalioiis , trad e accomif

s o r othe r payables , payment s due on outstanding judgment s o

r orders , taxes , interest , penaltie s o r othe r lega l liabilitie s o

r regulator y payments . m . CLOSIN G 3. 1 Upo n deliver

y o f th e Option >folice , AGLA

D shal l b e boun dto sel l AGLAD' s Membe r Interes t t o RDM andRD M shal

l b e boun dt o purchas e AGLAD' s Membe r Interes t from AGLAD . 3. 2 Closui g o f

th e sal e andpurchas e of

AGLAD' s Membe

r Interes t ("Closing" ) shall take plac e a t

296 0 "C " Street , Suite 202 , Anchorage , Alaska(or a t such other

plac e a s ma

y b e agree dbetween th e parties ) a t 1 2 noon o n th e fifth (5th ) da

y afte r th e date on whic

h RD M serve s it s Optio n Notic e t o AGLAD ("Closin g Date" ) providedthai , i f such da y i s no t abusines s day , then Closin g shal l take plac e a t 1 2 noo n on th

e first busines s da

y afte r tha t day . 3. 3 A t Closuig , th e AGLA

D shall: . ; a . transfe

r al l of AGLAD' s Membe

r Interes t t o RDM free an

dclea r o f al l liens , encumbrances , an

drestriction s whatsoever ; deliver a n absolut e assignmen

t AGLAD' s Membe

r Interes t to RDM ; execute anddelive

r to RD M aClosiiig Certificat

e in substantially th e for

m set fort h in Exliibit

B ; surrender all right s imde

r the Company' s article s an doperatin g agreement , a s amended , including t

o managemen

t andto projec t

managemen

t fees ; deliver al l tangibl e an

dintangibl e propert

y o f th e Company , including witliou t limitatio n drawing s an

dreports , documents , electroni c wor d processin g anddatafiles, faxes , databas e information , accountin g an d contac t information , passwords , files, an dother intellectua

l propert y (RD M wil l mak

e arrangement s t o pick

up th e files andthe filing cabinet s o f th e Company) ; an

d do suc h thing s an

dexecut e suc h document s a s shal l b e necessar y or a s RD M ma y reasonably reques t

to giv e effect

t o th e sal e of

AGLAD' s Member Interes t hereunder ; an

d b . c . d .

Optio n Agreemenl Pag e 2 o f 1 2

RD M V . TSAI A Exhibi t B - Pag e 2 o f 1 6Answe rt o Motio n t o Dismis s - Exhibi t B 

### RDM , LL C Optio n Agreemen t wit h AGLAD , Inc .

g . provide dtha

t if Closin g take s plac e prio

r to th e retiu-n of

Mr . Nun n t o Anchorage , all document s describe dabove whic h ar e in Mr . Nmin' s possessio n shal l b e delivere dt o RD M witlii n five workin g day s o f Mr . Nuim' s return . 3. 4 Subject

t o AGLAD' s materia

l complianc e wit

h it s obligation s unde

r Section 3. 3 an dothe r obligation s containe di

n thi s Agreement , RD

M shall , a t Closing , pa

y t o AGLA

D i n cas h o r by wir e transfer an amoun

t equa l to $50,000 . Tli e $350,000 balanc e of th e Purchas e Pric e (th e "Holdbac k

Amount" ) shal l b e payabl e t o AGLADl o th e extent provide dbelow , in cas h or b y wir e transfer , a s follows ; (a ) $150,00 0 o n adal e tha

t i s 1 2 month s afte

r tli e Closing Dale , les s (i ) an y materia l Undisclose dLiabilitie s and(ii ) an y damag e t o RD

M or th e Compan

y arisin g fromdi e breach of any covenant , representatio n or warrant y containe din thi s Agreemen t or i n th e Closin g Certificate ; (b ) $200,00 0 on adate tha

i i s 2 4 monlli s afte

r lli e Closing Date , les s (i ) an y materia l Undisclose dLiabilitie s an

d(ii ) an y damag e to RD

M or th e Compan

y arisin g fro

mth e breach o

f an y covenant , representatio n o r warrant y containe din thi s Agreemen t or in th e Closing Certificate ; (c ) Provided , however , i f

Postmar k transfer s it s groun

dleas e wit

h th e Airport , tli e Holdbac k Amoun t remainin g owin g wil l b e immediately du e i n full . IV . DUE DILIGENCE/COOPERATIO N Withi n five (5 ) day s followin g executioi i of thi s Agreement , AGLAD andth e Compan y shal l produc e t o RD M al l o f th e document s an dinformation describe di n Exhibi t C attached hereto which hav e no t

alread y bee n provide dto RDM , an dshal l promptl y produc e t o RD

M suc h additiona l informatio n ei

s i t ma y reques t durin g th e Option Perio dconcernin g th e Company' s business , operations , organization , andfinances (collectively , "Du e Diligenc e Informatio n Requests") , provide dthat

al l such document s which ar e i n Mr . Nutm' s possessio n shal l b e delivere dto RDM withi n five workin g day s of Mr . Ntmn' s return . I n additio n t o th e foregoing , AGLA D andth e Company shal l reasonabl y cooperat e wit h RD M in any otiier

request s mad

e i n comiectio n vwt

h it s du e diligenc e efforts , includin g without limitation , providui g acces s t o the physica l premise s andt o th e record s owne dor controlle db

y th e Company o r

it s Members . Th

e Compan y hereb y give s RD M permissio n to tal k t o it s outsid

e consultants , professiona

l advisor s an dpotentia

l investor s about

th e Du e Diligenc e Information provide dfay th e Company . RD M shal l b e exclusively responsibl e fo r an y additiona

l fee s incurre db y consultin g such consultants , adviser s an

dinvestors . V . ADDITIONA L COVENANT S 5. 1 Durmg th e Optio n Period : a. th e Compan

y shall no t

creat e or issu e t o an

y lliir dpart y an y ne w membership interest ; Optio n Agreemen

t Page 3 o f 1 2

RD M V . TSAI A Exhibi t B - Pag e 3 o f 1 6Answe rt o Motio n t o Dismis s - Exhibi t B 

### RDM , LL C Optio n Agreemen t wit h AGLAD , Inc .

b . in th e event

an y Membe r shall transfe

r all o r aportio n of

a n existin g membershi

p interes t t o athir dparty , such transfe

r shal l b e expressly subjec t

to , andthe purchasin g part

y shal l b e boundby , th e term s an dcondition s of

thi s Agreement ; withou

t limitin g th e foregouig , di e transferrin g Membe r agree s to execute , or

caus e t o b e executed , such document s a s ma y b e reasonably requestedb y RDM to memorializ e suc h continuin g obligations ; c . neitlier

th e Compaii

y no r th e Members shal

l (i ) sell , transfer , pledge , encumbe r o r alienate any materia

l portio n of

th e asset s or

propert y of th e Company , o r (ii ) mak e adividen do r

other distributio n fromth e Compan y to it s Members ; an

d d . tli e Member s an

dth e Compan

y will promptl

y advis e RD

M of an y matte r relatin g to th e asset s andaffairs o f th e Compan

y tha t occu r outside o f

tiie ordinar

y cours e o f it s business .

VI . WARRANTIE S AN D REPRESENTATIO N 6. 1 AGLA

D represent s an

dwan-ant s t o RDM tlia

t i t i s aregistere dholde

r and beneficia l owne r of AGLAD' s Membe

r Interes t andthat , apar

t fromthi s Agreement , it s Membe r Interes t i s free an dclea

r of an y charge , lien , equity , thirdpart y right , option , right

of pre-emptio n o r any other encumbrance , priorit

y o r securit y interes t whatsoever . AGLAD furthe r represent s tha t i t own s 67.72 % o f

th e outstandin g membership interest s mth e Company . 6. 2 AGLAD represent s an dwarrant s t

o RDM that , excep t

a s disclose di

n Exhibit A , an da s supplemente dpursuan t to thi s Agreement , ther

e are no Compan

y liabiUties , contrac t obligations , trad e account s o r other payables , payment s due o

n outstandin g judgment s o r orders , taxes , interest , penaltie s or other lega l UabUities or

regulator y payments . 6. 3 AGLA

D andth e Company eac

h represent

an dwan-an t tha t eac h ha s taken action to authoriz e th e execution , deliver y andperformanc e of.thi s Agreemen t Caro l Myer s represent s andwarrant s tha

t sh e an dLe e Nunn , constitutin g amajorit y o f th e boar do f director s fo

r AGLAD , authorize dmaboardmeetmg heldo n o r about Novembe r 16 , 200 8 AGLA

D to ente r int o thi s optio n agreement , an dauthorize dCaro l Myer s t o sign on behal f o f AGLAD ; attache da s E.^bi t D heret o i s atru e an dconec t cop y of such minutes . Carol Myer s ftulhe r represent s an

d warrant s Uiat

, to th e extent

that any furthe r actio n i s necessar

y to authoriz e th e execution , deliver y andperformanc e o f

thi s Agreement , she an

dLe e Nun n wil l cause , a s applicable , AGLA D andth e Company , t o take ; siic h action . Thi s Agreemen t ha s bee n duly execute dan d delivered , an dconstitute s legal , vali dandbindin g obligation s o f AGLA D andth e Company , enforceable , a s applicable , agains t AGLA D and/or th e Compan

y i n accordanc e wit

h it s terms , subject t o applicabl e bankruptcy , insolvenc y andsimila r law s affecting rights of

creditor s generally , an dgenera

l principle s of

equity . Neithe

r th e executio n of

, nor complianc e with , thi s Agreemen t wil l conflic t

wit h an y applicabl e la

w or an y contrac t obligatio n of

AGLA D or th e Compan y or violate an y provisio n o f

such party' s articles , bylaws , operatin g agreemen t or othe r governin g doctunents . N o exercis e of an y of th e tenn s of

thi s Agreement , or

an y right thereunder , will render

eithe r thi s Agreemen

t or th e Optio n unenforceable .

Optio n Agreemen t Pag e 4 o f 1 2

RD M V . TSAI A Exhibi t B - Pag e 4 o f 1 6Answe rt o Motio n t o Dismis s - Exhibi t B 

### RDM , LL C Optio n Agreemen t wit h AGLAD , Inc .

6^ 4 RDM represent s an

dwarrant s tha

t i t ha s th e unrestrictedright, powe r an d autlion't y t o execut

e an ddeliver tlii s Agreemen

t an dl o perfom i eac h o f tiie obligations , hereunder , an

dfurthe r that neither th e executio n of

, no r complianc e wit

h thi s Agreemen

t wil l conflict witl i an y applicabl e la

w or an y contrac t obligation s o

f RD M o r violate an y provision o

f it s articles ; bylaws , o r

governin g documents .

VII . NOTICE S An y notic e require do r

permitte dt o b e give

n unde r thi s Agreemen

t shall b e in writin g an

d shal l b e sen

t to it s registere doffic e a

t th e addres s set

fort h o n th e signatur

e pag e o f thi s Agreemen t o r t o suc h othe r

addres s a s apart

y ma y designat e b y notic e t o th e othe

r partie s i n accordanc e wit

h thi s clause . An

y such notic e shall b e deliveredpersonally , b y courier , o

r sen t b y certifie dmail , receip t

requested , postag e prepai dan dshall b e deeme dl o hav e bee

n delivered , i

f by persona

l servic e or

b y courier , when delivered , an dif b y mail , 5 day s afte

r deposit mtiie Unite dState s mail , postag e prepaid . Vin . GENERA L 8. 1 Thi s agreement

ma y b e execute di

n an y numbe r of counterparts , whic

h take n togeilie r shal l constitute on e agreement . 8. 2 Excep t

a s provide dmSectio n 5. 1 (b) , above , thi s Agreemen t ma y not b e assigned mwhol e or

i n part , but

i s bindmg upo n andshall operat e fo r th e benefit

o f tiie parties ' persona

l representative s an

doilie r successor s andpermitte dassigns . NotwiUistanding th e foregoing , RDM shall b e permitte dt o assig n it s rights an dobligation s unde

r thi s Agreemen

t t o an y direc t o r indirec t wholly-owne dsubsidiar

y o f RDM . 8. 3 Thi s Agreement

supersede s an

y previou s agreemen

t betwee n th e partie s i

n relatio n t o th e matter s deal t wit h andrepresent s (togethe

r wit h an y document s referredt o in thi s agreement ) th e entu e agreement

between th e partie s in relatio n t o such matters , an

dn o variatio n shal l b e effective tmles s mad e i n writin g andsignedb

y all partie s t o thi s Agreemen t 8. 4 Th e failur

e b y an y of th e partie s a

t an y tim e t o requir e performanc e b y an

y othe r part y or t o clai mabreac h o f

an y termo f thi s Agreemen

t shall no t b e deeme dt o b e awaive

r of an y right unde r thi s Agreement . 8. 5 Th e partie s shal l us e thei r respectiv e bes t

effort s to ensur e tha t an y necessar y thir d pai-tie s shall execute an

dd o all such furthe

r deeds , documents an

dthing s a s an

y part y ma y reasonably require b y notic e i n writin g t o an y otiie r part y to carr y th e provision s of

thi s Agreemen t into full forc e andeffect

an d(s o fa

r a s the y ar c able) shall do everyUiin

g necessar y (includin g withou t

limitatio n exercisin g their power s a s members an

da s director s o f

th e Company ) t o giv e effect

t o tiie spiri t

andinten t o f thi s agreement . 8. 6 11 1 additio n t o any otiier remed y availabl e a

t la w or in equity , i n tli e even

t of a breach o f tlii s Agreement

b y an y Member

or tiie Company , on e o r

bot h o f th e otiie r partie s shal

l b e entitie dto su e fo

r specifi c performanc e of

th e obligation s hereiuider . Optio n Agreemen l Pag e 5 o f 1 2

RD M V . TSAI A Exhibi t B - Pag e 5 o f 1 6

### Ansve f toWotio n t o Dismis s _ExV^ibit B 

# ;;SSSS5 ^

- ^

, « BaoVtoftbcpeoticstotbtsA^ , ^ accordance-thA^-^ ^

^ V.- C \Ereein«"'^ ' ^i,„andcoiistr»i^°'^..-sVacourts . :el^ing^o*^^^^' ^ Msbalibc60ven.ed^g^,UonoftbeMasV a -..n.r>aP.SSofvVucVv«

^ V " •RI)M,LL ^ 

### "f^e^eAgy ^

Its., - Address

## V^ApJv_ y Optio n Agree ' itoen t ?ag e 

### 6on a

RD^A ' -fSW^E^'^•'^'' ^ B . page ' 

### ,on 6Answe rt o Motio n t o Dismis s - Exhibi t B 

### RDM , LL C Optio n Agreemen t wit h AGLAD , Inc .

ANCHORAG

E GLOBA

L LOGISTIC S AIRPAR K DEVELOPMENT , INC . 

## .^y ^ By : Its : Address : /Ja . r e / - ^ /'ly e r j s e c rclji^ y /

-/WtLS '^•^i-jrP O Ao * U'/IS-S3 . /fa^/t^^d- , y^/ajjlA J9i,'y. ^ AGLA D POSTMARK , LLC -i^^^A^.. ^



# - r Its ; y/tyliUi.A^gt4 - Address : /^aAa ^

ji'/zs^ s /^^yi-Ui^ ^ Caro l Myer s individually , a s t o Sectio n 6. 3

Optio n Agreemen

t Pag e 7 o f 1 2

RD M V . TSAI A Exhibi t B - Pag e 7 o f 1 6Answe rt o Motio n t o Dismis s - Exhibi t B RDM , LL C Optio n Agreemen t wit h AGLAD , Inc .

'—• •

Account s Pavabl e

AGLA D In c - ProJ Mng r AGLA D Inc . Ai rCarg o Managemen t Grou p Alask a Communication s System s Alask a Departmen t o f Natura l Resource s Alask a Lan d Clearin g Contractor s LL C Alask a US A Insuranc e Broker s Amarica n Expres s Arcti c Offic e Product s Ban k o f Americ a Caro l A . Myer s Davi s Wrigh t Tremaln e LL P EEI S Consultin g Engineers , Inc . Enterpris e Engineering , Inc . Gar yPeterso n S Associates , (n c Grea t Norther n Engineerin g ' Lantech , Inc . Le e R . Nun n "—' ' Loche rLL C

Mlkunda , Cottrel l & Co . Municipalit yo f Anchorag e Municipalit yo f Anchorag e - Pemilt s Premiu m Financin g Specialists , Inc . Pruh s Constructio n Company , LL C Shanno n & Wilson , Inc . Stat e o f Alask a Stat e o f Alaska-DE C SUt e o f Alask a - DN R Stat e o f Alaska-TSAI A UC Q Associates , Inc . Willi s o f Alaska , Inc , TOTA L ACCOUNT S PAYABL E ContlnaentLlablllUc s Pegasu s buildin g leas e Catha yPacifi c buildin g leas e Risk s Kalitt a buildin g leas e 1 ^_.- ' Kalitt a ram p leas e

Optio n Agreemen t Exhibi t A

No v14 , O B

0.0 0

. 888.0 0 0.0 0 0,0 0 0.0 0 p.o o

. 0.0 0 . 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 . 1,610.9 2 81,143.3 4 549,812.1 0 12,921,2 5 1,509.0 0 . . 14.781.0 0 16.068.5 1 ' . • 5,247.0 0 ,4,627.5 0 • 5,448.7 2 108,895.1 8 •

, -57,000.0 0

" ' - 0.0 0 71,310.0 0 14.205.5 5 .0.0 0 0,0 0 0,0 0 39,800.7 8 57,396.3 6 O.O O 1,040,665.2 1

36,000.0 0 maximu m 28,500.0 0 maximu m

eac h cancelabl e i f th e othe rI s cancelle d eac h cancelabl e I f th e oihe ri s cancelle d ^

Pag e 8 o f 1 2

RD M V . TSAI A Exhibi t 8 - Pag e 8 o f 1 6Answe rt o Motio n t o Dismis s - Exhibi t B 

### RD|V| , LL C Optio n Agreemen t wit h AGLAD , Inc . 

# y

Account s Pavabl e AGLA D Inc . Ai rCarg o \ABn&qsTXKiT\

\ Grou p Alaska Communication s System s Alask a Lan d Clearin g Contractor s LL C Alaska USA Insuranc e Brokers America n Expres s Arcti c Offic e Product s Ban k o f Americ a Caro l A . Myers Davi s Wrigh t Tremain e LL P EEI S Consultin g Engineers , Inc . Enterpris e Engineering , Inc . Gar yPeterso n & Associates , In c Great Norther n Engineerin g Lantech , Inc . Le e R , Nun n Loche ra c v^_, . Mikunda , Cottrel l & Co .

ti/lunicipalil yo

f Anchorag e Municipalityo

f Anchorag e - Permit s Premiu m Financin g Specialists , Inc . Pruh s Constructio n Company , LL C RB C Dai n Rausche r RD M Shanno n & Wilson , inc . Stat e o f Alaska Stat e o f Alaska - DE C . Stat e o f Alask a - Dep t o f Nat l Resource s Stat e o f Alaska-DN R Stat e o f Alaska-TSAI A UCC J Associates , Inc . Watterso n Constructio n TOTA L ACCOUNT S PAYABL E Contractors hav e performe d staff wor k (suc h AGLA D Postmark , LL C



### Exhibi t A

No v22 , 0 8

888.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 17,500.0 0 Pai d b

yRD M pos

t signin g 0,0 0 o.po . 0.0 0 1,532.42 ; 87,919,1 9 549,812,1 0 12,921,2 5 * 1,509.0 0 " 14,781.0 0 * 16,068.5 1 Par

t now i n collection . Se e A/ P file . 5,247.0 0 4,627.5 0 Defene d portio n ($3,235 ) du e withi n 3 0 day s o f

finandng , o rbear

s interes t at 12% . 5,471.7 5 200 7 ta

xretur n bein g hel d COD . 106,895.1 8 + Propertytaxe s hv D years i n arrears Interes t accming . Mun i invoice s sporadically , s o amoun t not u p t o date . Se e A/ P file s (200 7 & 2008) . 57,000.0 0 ±Est . BId g pemil l wil l no t b e complete d unti l pai d • 0.0 0 71,310.0 0 * Dewalerin g sit e 0.0 0 Ha s no t bille d fo rexpense s i n connectio n wit h wor k don e o n bon d issu e hw

o years ago . 11,935.0 0 14,736.2 1 Interes t acauirig . 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 40,020.8 8 Pai d b

yRD M pos t signing . 57,396.3 6 .0.0 0 * 1,077,671.3 5 (befor e paynient s note d above )

as estimates , schedules , preliminar ydesigns ) i n advanc e o f anticipate d 

### '

fiel d wort , (

f RD M were l o chang e contractors , i t i s possibl e tha t invoice s coui d b e presente d fo rwor h performed . Pag e 1 o f 2 

# i

• ^

RD M V . TSAI A Exhibi t B - Pag e 9 o f 1 6Answe rt o Motio n t o Dismis s - Exhibi t B RDI^ , LL C Optio n Agreemen t wit h AGLAD , Inc . '

Contlnqe m Liabilitie s Pegau s buildin g leas e Catha yPacifi c buildin g leas e

Contlhaencie s Kalitt a buildin g leas e

. , Kalitla.ram p leas e , . Contract s & Commitment s EEI S Consultin g Engineer s

Enterpris e Engineering , (nc . Gar yPeterso n 4 Associates , In c Grea t Norther n Engineerin g

Lantec h Loche rLL C Pruh s Constructio n Co. , LL C

RB C Dai n Rausche r

Shanno n & Wilso n UC G Watterso n Constructio n AGLA D Postmark , LL C Exhibi t A No v22 , 0 8 36,000.0 0 maximum . Penalt yclaus e fo rdamage s (i f any ) fo r

no t completin g buildin g b y a dat e certain . 28,500.0 0 maximum . Penalt yclaus e fo rdamage s (i f any ) fo r

no t completirr g buildin g b y a dat e certain .

Eac h leas e I s cancelabl e i f th e othe ri s cancelled .

Desig n managemen t an d coordination . Sit e plans . Variou s pemiit s {suc h a s disposa l site) . Utilit y coordination . Wate r& sewe t design s fo rsite . etc . Contrac t fo rStag e 1 ram p desig n (5113.000 ) an d engineerin g suppor t durin g constructio n (S9.500) . -Artis t rendering s an d floo rplan s fo rbuilding . .Hi s architeclura i conlra d i s wit h . (Watterson? )

. , Electrica l & mechanica l desig n contracto rfo rramp . N o contrac t I n file . Ha s don e staf f work . Contrac t (thr u Locher ) fo rsunreying . Contrac t forpermiltin g (Corp s permit) . Wor k complete . Contractforportiono f sit e work . Dal e o f completio n i n contrac t ha s past , bu t Pruh s coul d stil l clai m contrac t I s i n force . Ha s don e staf f work . Want s al l sit e work . Contrac t fo rinvestmen t services . Cancelable . Fe e owe d onl yi f bond s ar e Issued . Out-of-pocke t expense s t o b e reimbursed . Contrac t (thr u Locher ) fo rgeotec h work .

. Contrac t fo rfeasibilit ystudy . Hav e quot e fo rdesign-buil d contract , wit h guarantee d hnaximu m price , fo rStag e 1 building . N o contrac t i n file . Watterso n ha s don e staf f work .

Pag e 2 o f 2

RD M V . TSAI A Exhibi t B - Pag e 1 0 o f 1 6Answe rt o Motio n t o Dismis s - Exhibi t B 

### RDIM , LL C Optio n Agreemen t wit h AGLAD , Inc .

Exhibit B Closing Certificat

e AGLA D represent s andwarrant s t o RDM : 1 . Tha

t th e item s containe do

n Schedule 1 t o thi s Exhibi t B constitut

e aful l an d complete accountin g of

th e Company' s Closing Dat e Liabilities . 2 . Tha

t th e Compan

y an dAGLA D hav e respondedfull

y an dcompletely to eac

h an d ever y Du e Diligenc e Information Reques t mad e by RDM . The information provide dto RDM was complet e andaccurat

e as o f tli e date o f

the Company' s initia l respons e and , except

a s se t fort h in Schedule 2 t o thi s Exhibit , n o additiona

l informatio n relatin g t o an

y Du e Diligenc e Information Reques t ha s subsequentl

y been receive dor

i s bein g hel

dby th e Compan

y o r it s Members , an

dno respons e t o an y Du e Diligenc e Information Reques t i s inaccurat

e o r incomplet e a s o f th e Closin g Date . 3 . Th e Warrantie s an dRepresentation s containedin Section s 6.1 , 6. 2 an d6. 3 o f tli e Agreement

wer e tru e an

dcorrect whe n made , andremain tru e andcorrect i n al l material respec t

a s of th e Closing Date . Anchorag e Globa l Logistic s Airpar

k Development , Inc . By : Its :

AGLA D Postmark , LL

C By ; Its :

Optio n Agreemen

t Pag e 9 o f 1 2

RD M V . TSAI A Exhibi t B - Pag e 1 1 o f 1 6Answe rt o Motio n t o Dismis s - Exhibi t B



### RDM , LL C Optio n Agreemen t wit h AGLAD , Inc .

-

- Exhibit C Due Dilicenc e Material s 1 . Al l busines s record s o

f th e Compan

y including formatio n documents , minute s o f Compan y meetings , books of

accoimts , account s payable , account s receivable , loa n documents , periodi c financia l statements , ta

x rehims , insuranc e record s an d the like . 2 . An y an dall economi c analyses , financial analyse s or schedule s o

r pr o fomia projection s concernin g th e economi c prospect s o f th e project

whethe r preparedb

y th e Company , an

y consultant s to th e Company , tli e Te dSteven s Anchorag e Ifiternationa

l Airpor t o r ari y oUie r sourc e along wit

h an y pUie r suc h material s availabl e to tli e Compan

y tha t for mapar t o f it s busines s records . 3 . All documents , request s fo r proposals , pending o

r approve dcontracts , engineering reports , surveys , environmeiita l reports , permits , plans , specifications , bid s an d th e like concernin g th e constructio n o f har dstands , apron s parkin g lots , buildings , utilitie s an dan y other aspec t o f th e construction to b e performe da t th e site . 4 . Eac

h an dever y documen

t pertainin g to th e renta

l o r leasin g of har dstand s o r spac e a t th e project , whethe

r insid e or outside of an y propose dbuilding , including , biit

no t limite dto : a . The leas e betwee n TedSteven s Anchorag e Internationa l Airpor t an dth e Compan y whereii t th e Compan

y lease s afe

e interes t in th e 4 0 acr

e parcel approximatel y describe da s Lot 2 , Lo t 3 , Lot 4 andLo t 5 of th e Company' s AlaskaAirpar

k Development

- Sit e Plan . b . The 12-yea

r leas e between KalittaAi

r an dth e Compan y fo r hardstan dspace ; c . The 5-yea

r leas e between Evergreen Internationa l andth e Compan

y fo r har d standspace ; d . The 12-yea

r leas e between Kalitt aAi

r andth e Compan y wheremKalittalease s 6,75 0 square fee

t o f warehous e spac e i n th e proposedCompan y warehouse ; e . Th e 10-yea

r leas e between Pegasu s Aircraf t Maintenanc e andth e Compan y wherei n Pegasu s lease s 7,500 squar e fee t i n th e propose dCompan

y warehouse ; f . The 5-yea

r leas e between Evergreen Internationa l an dth e Compan

y wherein Evergree n lease s 1,19

0 squar e fee t in th e propose dCompan

y warehouse ; g . The 5-yea

r leas e between AlaskaSnow Remova l an dth e Compan

y wherein Alask aSno w Removal lease s 5,720 squar e fee t in th e propose dCompan

y warehouse ; Optio n Agreemen t

Pag e 1 0 of ) 2 • t

RD M V . TSAI A Exhibi t B - Pag e 1 2 o f 1 6Answe rt o Motio n t o Dismis s - Exhibi t B 

### RDI^ , LL C Optio n Agreemen t wit h AGLAD , Inc .

h . Th e 5-yea

r leas e between Catha

y Pacific an

dth e Compan y wherei n Catha

y lease s 2,00 0 square fee

t i n th e proposedCompan

y warehouse ; i . Th e 12-yea

r leas e between Kalittaan

dtli e Compan

y wherein Kalittalease s 75 0 square fee t o f office spac e i

n the proposedCompan

y warehouse ; j . Th e 10-yea

r leas e between Pegasu s Aircraf t Maintenanc e an

dth e Compan

y wherei n Pegasu s lease s 1,82 0 squar e fee t of offic e spac e i n the proposed Company warehouse ; ' k . Th e 5-yea

r leas e between Evergreen Internationa l an dUi e Compan y wherei n Evergree n lease s 30 0 squar e fee t o f office spac e i

n th e propose dCompan

y warehouse ; 1 . Th e 10-yea

r leas e between Trailbos s an dth e Compan

y wherein Trailbos s lease s 1,00 0 square fee

t o f offic e spac e i n th e propose dCompan y Warehouse ; m . Th e 5-yea

r leas e between Ho

t Wing s p f Alask aan dth e Compan

y wherein Ho

t Wing s lease s 1,48

0 square fee

t o f ofSc e spac e in th e propose dCompan y warehouse ; n . Th e 5-yea

r leas e betwee n Catha

y Pacific an

dthe Compan

y wherei n Catha

y lease s 1,40 0 squai' e fee

t o f offic e spac e i n the propose dCompan y warehouse ; 0 . An y andal l oUie

r pending , propose dor

partially negotiate dlease s wit h an y othe r potential tenan t

fo r hardstan dspace , warehous e spac e o r offic e spac e in the project .

Optio n Agreemen t Pag e 1 1 o f 1 2

RD M V . TSAI A Exhibi t B - Pag e 1 3 o f 1 6Answe rt o Motio n t o Dismis s - Exhibi t B



### RDM , LL C Optio n Agreemen t wit h AGLAD , Inc .

Anchorag e Globa l Logistic s Airpar k Developmen t

bac . Minute s o f

Boar do f

Director s Meetin g o n Novembe r

16,200 8 Attendee s Carol A . Myer s —

telcphonicall y Le e R . Nun n ~ telcphonicall y Not i n Attendanc e Jame s P , Fer o Othe r Attendee s

The meetin g wa s calle dto orde r b y th e Chairman , Mr . Nunn , a t 1:55 a m(o n Novembe

r 17) . Quoru m The Corporat

e Secretary , Ms . Myers , advise dtlia t tw o o f three director s were i

n attendance , constitutin g aquorum . Notic e Ms . Myer s advise dtha

t tli e urgenc y o f

the situatio n preventedgivin g proper notic e o f th e meetin g and , a s Mr . Fer

o i s unreachable , the Coiporatio n wil l have t o see

k aM'oivc r o f notic e o f the meetin g fro

mMr . Fero . Mr . Nunn advisedtha t th e meeting i s justifie dan

dw e shoul d proceed , subsequentl y explainin g th e situatio n t o Mr . Fero . NE W BUSINES S Resolutio n 2Q08-10 : Ontio n t o Sell Owncrshiti Interes t i n AGLA D Postmark . LL C Ms . Myer s advi.se

dtlia t a n offe r ha dbee n receivednea

r th e clos e of

busines s on Frida

y fro m Debenha mProperties , LLC fo

r a n optio n to purchas e the Corporation' s interes t in AGLA D Postmark , LLC . She explaine dthat , a s previously advised , lli e lan dleas e wit

h th e Te dSteven s Anchorag e Liternaliona

l Airpoi t i s in defaul

t an dwill b e los

i on November

19.200 8 i

f th e ren t arrearag e i s no t

pai dan dcondition s o f

"fmancia l security " ar

e no t met . Th e Coiporatio n ha

d bee n i n negotiation s previousl y witli othe r Debenha mentitie s unde

r othe r propose dstnictures , an dthe Corporatio n hadtrie dt o selltli e asset s o f AGLA D Postmark , LLC to thirdpartie s without success . Debenha

mProperties , LL

C believe s that , give

n time , i t ca n obtai n othe

r iiieinber s an

dfinancing fo

r AGLAD Postmark , LLC . Accordingly , i t ha s propose da

n option t o purchas e th e Corporation' s interes t wliil e i t attempt s to cur

e th e default

o n tli e leas e an

dfind financing. Th e optio n expire s o n Decembe r 31,2008 , tli e dat

e b y whic h th e landleas e require s financing i

n plac e fo r constructio n o f

Stag e One of

tli e facility .

RD M V . TSAI A Exhibi t B - Pag e 1 5 o f 1 6Answe rt o Motio n t o Dismis s - Exhibi t B



### RDM , LL C Optio n Agreemen t wit h AGLAD , Inc .

Debeiiliaii i Properties , LL

C ha s offere

dt o bu y the Corporation' s 67.72 % interiss t i n AGLA D Postmark , LL

C fo r $400,00 0 i f

tli e optio n i s exercised , payable J50,00 0 upon exercisin g th e option , $150,000 ayea

r later , an d$200,00 0 anothe

r yea r later . Ms . Myer s mad e amotio n to adop t

Resolutio n 2008-10 . Mr . Nun n seconded . Ms . Myers askedfo

r avote o n th e resolution . Resolutio n 2008-1 0 passed . Mr . Nun n appointe dMs . Myer s lo serv e a s actin g Presiden t while h e i s traveling . A discussion ensuedregardin g lli e due diligenc e process , an dMr . Nun n advise dtha

t hi s workpaper s wer

e in storag e andtha

t h e wouldhave t

o segregat e them . Unti l then , or

instea d of , h e recommendedtha

t Debenha mProperties , LL

C obtai n drawing s an

dothe r document s directly fro

mEEI S Consultin g Engineer s andEnterpris e Engineering . Furthe r discussio n ensue dregardin g deb t paymen t prioritie s fo

r Ui e Coiporatio n if

th e optio n i s exercisedan

dfund s become available . Adjournmen t .Mr . Nun n movedto adjour

n the meeting . Ms . Myers seconded . Witliou t objection , th

e meeting wa s adjourneda

t 2:1 3 am . The undersignedhereb y certifie s Uia t sh e i s tli e dul y electedan

dqualifie dSecretar

y an dth e custodia n of th e book s an

drecord s an

dsea l of Anchorag e Globa

l Logistic s Airpar

k Developmen

t Inc. , acorporatio n duly forme dpursuan t to the law s o

f tli e state of

Alaska , an

dtha t the foregoing i s atru e recor do f th e meetin g of

tli e Boar do f Directors , andtha

t sai dmeeting was hel do n Novembe

r 17,2008 . I N WITNES S THEREOF , I hav e execute dm y nam e a s Secretar

y an dhav e hereunt

o affixe dtli e coqiorat e sea l of th e above-name dCorporatio n o n thi s th e / S da y o f //^itMic ^ , 2008 . Secretar y Carol A . Myer s

RD M V . TSAI A Exhibi t B - Pag e 1 6 o f 1 6