alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# AirWisconsin AIRLINES CORPORATION September I7, 20I4 U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations, M-30 I200 NewJersey Avenue, SE. West Building, ground floor, Room WI2-I40 Washington, D.C. 20590 RE: Exemption I0684 renewal, Docket number: FAA-20I2-I278 Dear Sir: In accordance with the Code ofFederal Regulations, 14 CFR 11.63, Air Wisconsin Airlines Corporation (AWl) petitions for arenewal ofexemption I0684. Exemption number I0684 provides relieffrom Title I4, Code ofFederal Regulations 121.652 (a) and (c). When granted, this will allow a new Air Wisconsin pilot in command (PIC), who is subjectto higher landing weatherminimum requirements, to operate to the normal, lower Category I minimums underthe stipulated conditions. No changes to the exemption are requested. The conditions and circumstances, in regard to public interest and equivalent levels ofsafety, which warranted the original grant ofexemption, continue to exist. This exemption has been in use since January of20I2 butthe similar exemption 5549 has been in use since December, I991 with no known compromise ofsafety. The granting ofthis exemption is not a controversial issue. Air Wisconsin, in accordance with the provisions ofI4 CFR 11.87 (a-d), Exceptions to Publication ofSummary ofPetition for Exemption, requests that a find ofgood cause be made for waiving publication in the Federal Register. No precedents will be set by granting the requested reliefand this request is identical to previously approved requests. Air Wisconsin therefore requests that publication and the associated comment period be waived. A summary ofthis petition as required by I4 CFR 11.81, is offered below: Summary ofAir Wisconsin Airlines Corporation Petition Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp., as a Part I21 certificate holder, petitions for an exemption form 14 CFR I21.652 (a) and (c). This exemption permits a pilot in command under Part 12I to conduct an instrument approach procedure to the weather minima prescribed by this exemption duringthe first I00 hours ofservice as a pilot in command, in the type ofairplane he or she is operating, using an alternative means approved by the Administrator ofsatisfying 14 CFR I2I.652 (a) and (c), subject to specified conditions and limitations.

as Lesh Manager ofFight Standards (920) 749-4I77 Doug.lesh@airwis.com

W6390 Challenger Drive, Suite 203 • Appleton, WI 54914-9120 Phone: 920-739-5123
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 197 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 197

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 27, 1998

        Received and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas Sara E. Lister, Assistant Secretary of the Army for Manpower and Reserve 
        Affairs, on October 26, 1997, at a public conference held in Baltimore, 
        Maryland, stated that ``The Marines are extremists.'';
Whereas such a characterization denigrates 222 years of sacrifice and dedication 
        to the Nation by the Marine Corps
    and dishonors the hundreds of thousands of Marines whose blood has been shed 
        in the name of freedom;
Whereas citizens from all walks of life have donned the Marine Corps uniform and 
        gone to war to defend the Nation, many never to return;
Whereas the young people of America join the Marine Corps to be challenged, to 
        be held to high standards, and to be part of something bigger than 
        themselves;
Whereas a characterization of the Marines as ``extremists'', especially when 
        made by a senior military department official with responsibility for 
        military personnel policy, has the potential to have an extraordinarily 
        detrimental effect on morale, recruitment, and retention not just for 
        the Marine Corps but for all branches of the Armed Forces;
Whereas Marines and Army soldiers have fought and died side by side time and 
        again in defense of the Nation;
Whereas the values of honor, courage, and commitment embodied by the Marine 
        Corps are not extreme; and
Whereas to describe the Marines as ``extremists'' violates all rules of 
        propriety and does not reflect the views of the American people: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That (1) Sara E. Lister, Assistant Secretary of the Army for Manpower 
and Reserve Affairs, should immediately resign from office, and (2) if 
she does not so resign, the President should remove her from office.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 13, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
LOG OF MEETING

DIRECTORATE FOR ENGINEERING SCIENCES

SUBJECT: ASTM Bassinet/Cradle Subcommittee Meeting

DATE OF MEETING: April 8, 2013

PLACE OF MEETING: ASTM Headquarters

LOG ENTRY SOURCE: Patricia Edwards

COMMISSION ATTENDEES: Patricia Edwards, Jonathan Midgett, Doug Lee, 

Suad Wanna-Nakamara, Greg Rea

NON-CPCS ATTENDEES: Contact ASTM for attendee list

SUMMARY OF MEETING:

Outstanding ballots were reviewed: 

F15, 13-01 Item #11: Updated mattress flatness test to include the missing mattress

support bars option to the test procedure. No negatives, just comments. Comments 

include adding a definition for “permanent” that has been included in other standards. No 

changes to be made now, as a result of the comments. 

13-01 Item #12: Warnings updated to clarify the font size required. No negatives, and 

only 2 comments. No changes to be made now, as a result of the comments. 

These two items will move forward and be approved April 1, 2013 for inclusion in 

F2194-13. 

The Stability Task Group meeting did not report, but there is a scheduled conference call 

on April 18, 2013. 

New Business: 6.5.4 Side Height – It should not be a sub-section, but instead, it should be 

6.6 as its own section. The same issue is with the test requirement as well. This should be 

an editorial changes. It will be reflected in F2194-13. 

New Business: Scope of the standard. Dave Campbell brought up an issue that he raised 

in the NPR comments. If a rocker/napper type of product is required to meet the bassinet 

standard when in the flat/napping mode, it will be in conflict for restraints, warnings, etc. 

After much discussion and conflicting opinions as to whether or not a conversion product 

should meet both standards for the product, nothing was proposed or decided on during 

this meeting. Subsequent subcommittee meetings (inclined sleepers and rocker products) 

the same discussions occurred and both subcommittees decided to include language in the 

scope that makes it clear that dual mode products are covered in the scope of both 

standards.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Somsak Chivavibul,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of Navient Student Loan Trust 2014-8 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.

[Signature Page Follows]



---

|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2016                 
|                                     
|/s/ SOMSAK CHIVAVIBUL                
|Somsak Chivavibul                    
|President and Chief Financial Officer
|(Senior Securitization Officer)      
|Navient Funding, LLC
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Randy Okeith HOGAN, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-11429 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed May 26, 2017

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Randy Okeith Hogan, Pro Se

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Randy Okeith Hogan has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hogan has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir, R. 47.5.4'.
<PAGE>

                   STATEMENT UNDER OATH OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
               OFFICER REGARDING FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES RELATING
                             TO EXCHANGE ACT FILINGS

I, T. M. Whichard III, state and attest that:

     (1)  To the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the covered
          reports of BJ Services Company, and, except as corrected or
          supplemented in a subsequent covered report:

          .    no covered report contained an untrue statement of a material
               fact as of the end of the period covered by such report (or in
               the case of a report on Form 8-K or definitive proxy materials,
               as of the date on which it was filed); and

          .    no covered report omitted to state a material fact necessary to
               make the statements in the covered report, in light of the
               circumstances under which they were made, not misleading as of
               the end of the period covered by such report (or in the case of a
               report on Form 8-K or definitive proxy materials, as of the date
               on which it was filed).

     (2)  I have reviewed the contents of this statement with BJ Services
          Company's Audit Committee.

     (3)  In this statement under oath, each of the following, if filed on or
          before the date of this statement, is a "covered report":

          .    the Annual Report on Form 10-K for Fiscal Year ended September
               30, 2001 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
               Commission on December 18, 2001 of BJ Services Company;

          .    all reports on Form 10-Q, all reports on Form 8-K and all
               definitive proxy materials of BJ Services Company filed with the
               Commission subsequent to the filing of the Form 10-K identified
               above; and

          .    any amendments to any of the foregoing.


/s/ T. M. Whichard III                   Subscribed and sworn to before me
------------------------------------     this 14th day of August, 2002.
T. M. Whichard III
Date: August 14, 2002

                                         /s/ Barbara W. Fontenot
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Notary Public

                                         My Commission Expires: July 30, 2006
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Manuel ESCAMILLA, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-10234 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed January 18, 2018

*301Leigha Amy Simonton, James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee Manuel Escamilla, Pro Se

Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Manuel Escamilla, federal prisoner # 08945-062, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to correct the record pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36. He argues that the district court miscalculated his .total offense level, which resulted in an incorrect amended guidelines range, in the order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion. Escamilla also raises sentencing errors based on *Mathis v. United States,*— U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 2243, 195 L.Ed.2d 604 (2016), and *Alleyne v. United States,*570 U.S. 99, 133 S.Ct. 2151, 186 L.Ed.2d 314 (2013).

In cases where there are no factual disputes, we review a district court’s denial of a Rule 36 motion de novo. *United States v. Mackay,*757 F.3d 195, 197 (5th Cir. 2014). Under Rule 36, the district “court may at any time correct a clerical error in a judgment, order, or other part of the record, or correct an error in the record arising from oversight or omission.” Fed. R. Crim. P. 36. However, the rule applies only to clerical errors and not substantive matters. *Mackay,*757 F.3d at 197-200. The record does not reflect that there is any error, clerical or otherwise, concerning the calculation of Escamilla’s total offense level. The proposed change to his total offense level sought by Escamilla is substantive, rather than clerical, in nature and could not be made under Rule 36. *See Mackay,*757 F.3d at 200; *see also United States v. Buendia-Rangel,*553 F.3d 378, 379 (5th Cir. 2008). Additionally, Escamilla’s *Mathis*and *Alley ene*claims are challenging sentencing errors to which correction under Rule 36 does not apply. *See Mackay,*757 F.3d at 200.

Accordingly, the district court’s denial of Escamilla’s motion to correct the record pursuant to Rule 36 is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 155

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp should be issued

in honor of United States Masters Swimming, Incorporated.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 23, 1997

Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. DAVIS of Virginia, and Mr.

FROST) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp

should be issued in honor of United States Masters

Swimming, Incorporated.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) a postage stamp should be issued in honor

4 of United States Masters Swimming, Incorporated;

5 and

6 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee

7 should recommend to the Postmaster General that

8 such a stamp be issued.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-3 to all references to Ryder Scott Company, L.P. and/or the
reports prepared by Ryder Scott Company, L.P. in the Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Spinnaker Exploration Company for the year ended December 31, 2001 and to the
reference to our firm as experts in this Registration Statement on Form S-3.

                                             /s/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.

June 5, 2002
1

The Honorable Donald J. Stohr, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-3363

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Antonio Johnson, * Eastern District of Missouri.

*

Appellee. * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

___________

Submitted: April 22, 2004

Filed: May 10, 2004

___________

Before MELLOY, HANSEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Antonio Johnson appeals the district court’s1

 denial of his 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) sentence-reduction motion. Having carefully reviewed the record, we

agree with the district court that Johnson is not entitled to a sentence reduction based

on Amendment 518 to the Sentencing Guidelines. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(a);

Delgado v. United States, 162 F.3d 981, 983 (8th Cir. 1998).
-2-

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 3

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the current Federal income tax

deduction for interest paid on debt secured by a first or second home

should not be further restricted.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 7, 1997

Mrs. ROUKEMA submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the current Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on debt secured by a first or second home should not be further

restricted.

Whereas homeownership is a fundamental American ideal,

which promotes social and economic benefits beyond the

benefits that accrue to the occupant of the home;

Whereas homeownership is an important factor in promoting

economic security and stability for American families;

Whereas it is proper that the policy of the Federal Government is and should continue to be to encourage homeownership;
2

HCON 3 IH

Whereas the increase in the cost of housing over the last 10

years has been greater than the increase in family income;

Whereas, for the first time in 50 years, the percentage of

people in the United States owning their own homes has

declined;

Whereas the percentage of people in the United States between the ages of 25 and 29 who own their own home

has declined from 43 percent in 1976 to 38 percent

today;

Whereas the current Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on debt secured by a first home has been a valuable cornerstone of this Nation’s housing policy for most

of this century and may well be the most important component of housing-related tax policy in America today;

Whereas the current Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on debt secured by second homes is of crucial

importance to the economies of many communities;

Whereas the continued deductibility of interest paid on debt

secured by a first or second home has particular importance in promoting other desirable social goals, such as

education of young people; and

Whereas the Federal income tax deduction for interest paid

on debt secured by a first or second home has been limited twice in the last 6 years, and was further eroded as

a result of the 1990 Budget Act: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 current Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on
3

HCON 3 IH

1 debt secured by a first or second home should not be fur2 ther restricted.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 136 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 136

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 31, 1997

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
            Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in consonance with section 132(a) of the Legislative 
Reorganization Act of 1946, when the House adjourns on the legislative 
day of Friday, August 1, 1997 or Saturday, August 2, 1997, pursuant to 
a motion made by the Majority Leader or his designee, it stand 
adjourned until noon on Wednesday, September 3, 1997, or until noon on 
the second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to 
section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and 
that when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on 
Thursday, July 31, 1997, Friday, August 1, 1997, or Saturday, August 2, 
1997, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority Leader or his designee 
in accordance with this concurrent resolution, it stand recessed or 
adjourned until noon on Tuesday, September 2, 1997, or until such time 
on that day as may be specified by the Majority Leader or his designee 
in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day 
after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, 
in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 31, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Powerhouse Technologies Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David R. Wells, Vice President Finance Operations (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

David R. Wells
Vice President Finance Operations
(Principal Financial Officer)

Date: February 9, 2005