T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. ALFR EDO M ENDO ZA- ALVA RE Z, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 12- 30186 D. C . No . 2 : 1 0 - c r - 0 2 1 4 0 - F VS ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe E a s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on F r e d L . V a n S i c kl e , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r24, 2013 ** B e f o r e : R A W L I N S O N , N .R . S M I T H , a n d C H R I S T E N , C ir c u it J u d g e s . A l f r e do M e ndoz a - A l va r e z appe a l s f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e nta nd c ha l l e nge s the 27- m onth t e rm of s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e i m pos e d upon r e voc a t i on of s u p e rv i s e d r e l e a s e . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n d w e a f f i rm. M e ndoz a - A l va r e z c ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourtpr oc e dur a l l ye rr e d by 

# FI LED OC T 03 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 30186 2 fa i l i ng t o con si der and expl ai n w hy a new t erm of supervi se d rel ea se w as w arrant ed i n l i gh tof U . S . S . G . § 5 D 1. 1(c) (201 1), w hi ch di re ct s thata di stri ctcourt o rd i n ari l y sh o u l d n o ti m p o se a t erm o f su p erv i sed rel ease i f th e d efen d an ti s a de port abl e a l i e n. T he r e c or d r e f l e c t s tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourtc ons i de r e d s e c t i on 5 D 1 .1 ( c ) a n d a d e q u a te lye x p la in e d w h yit d e c lin e d to f o llo w it. C o n tr a ryto M endo za -A l vare z’ s c on t ent i on , no w ri tt en st at em entof re as on s w as re qu i re d be c aus e the di s tr i c tc ourti m pos e d at e rm of s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e w i thi n the G u id e lin e s r a n g e . See 1 8 U .S .C . § 3 5 5 3 ( c ) ( 2 ) ; U .S .S .G . § 7 B 1 .3 ( g ) ( 2 ) ; U ni ted Stat es v. V

alda vi no s- T

orres , 70 4 F . 3d 67 9, 69 3 (9th C i r. 20 12 ) ( “ no departure a na l y s i s i s tr i gge r e d” bythe i m pos i t i on of s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e be c aus e s e c t i on 5D 1. 1(c) i s notm andat ory) . M endo za -A l vare z a l so chal l enges the t erm of supervi se d rel ea se as s u b s ta n tiv e lyu n r e a s o n ab le . T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt d id n o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in im p o s in g a2 7 - m o n th te rm o f s u p e rv is e d r e le a s e . See V alda vi no s- T

orres , 704 F . 3d a t 6 9 2 . T h e s e n te n c e is s u b s ta n tiv e lyr e a s o n ab le in lig h t o f th e 1 8 U .S .C . § 3553( a ) s e nt e nc i ng f

a c t or s a nd the t ot a l i tyof the c i r c um s t a nc e s , i nc l udi ng M e n d o z a - A lv a r e z ’s n u m e r o u s p r io rd e p o rta tio n s . Se e id . a t 6 9 2 - 9 3 ; see a l so U . S . S . G . § 5D 1. 1( c ) c m t . n. 5 ( di s tr i c tc ourts houl d c ons i de ri m pos i ng t e rm of s u p e rv is e d r e le a s e o n d e p o rtab le a lie n if it d e te rm in e s s u p e rv is e d r e le a s e w o u ld12- 30186 3 prov i de an added m ea sure of det erre nce and prot ec t i on ). AF F I RME D.