alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1


 


 


 





11651 Central Parkway,
Ste. 118


Jacksonville, FLorida
32224




 


Date


 


Dear _________________,


 


We are pleased to offer
you a seat on the Board of Directors of Drone Aviation Holding Corp., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) for a term
of ______ (___) years. Upon your execution of this letter agreement, you will have consented to your appointment, which will be
contingent and dependent upon approval of the Director Agreement by the Board of Directors (such date, the “Appointment Date”).


 


For and in consideration of the services to be performed by
you, the Company agrees to pay for your services as follows:


 


	Fee:	An annual fee equal to $______ (“Annual Fee”), payable in equal monthly installments
	 	 
	Annual bonus:	As determined by the Compensation Committee
	 	 
	Restricted stock:	_________ options to purchase the Company’s unregistered common stock at an exercise price based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the Appointment Date (the “Options”). The Options shall vest 50% one year from the Appointment Date and the other 50% two years from the Appointment Date so long as you are a member of the Company’s Board of Directors. The Options will be exercisable at any time after they vest and prior to the four year anniversary of the Appointment Date. The Option shall be issued in compliance with all rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the terms of a Stock Option Agreement to be provided by the Company. The Options granted to you shall be in effect subject to your continuous service as a member of the Board. In the event that your service is terminated prior to the ____ (___) year anniversary of the Appointment Date for any reason, all unvested options shall be forfeited. 


 


You hereby also consent
to the use of your name and biographical information in documentation prepared by the Company as it relates to your becoming a
member of the Company’s Board


 


Kindly indicate your
consent to the matters discussed herein by signing and returning a copy of this letter to us as soon as possible.


 





	 	 	Sincerely,
	 	 	 
	 	 	Jay H. Nussbuam,
	 	 	CEO and Chairman



 


Accepted: __________________________________    Date:
_______________


 





	 	
        main: 904•834•4400

        fax:    904•834•4360

        info@droneaviationcorp.com

        www.DRONEAVIATIONCORP.COM
Order filed, September 6, 2018.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00268-CR

____________

ALEXANDER PORTERFIELD SANCHEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 147th District Court

Travis County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. D-1-DC-17-201426

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was originally due July 2, 2018. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 35.1. The court previously granted two extensions of time to file the 

reporter’s record. To date the record has not been filed. Because the reporter’s 

record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Kimberly D. Lee, the court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 15 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

               STATEMENT UNDER OATH OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                 AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER REGARDING FACTS
               AND CIRCUMSTANCES RELATING TO EXCHANGE ACT FILINGS

     I, Joseph M. Ivey state and attest that:

     1. To the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the covered reports
of ENCOMPASS SERVICES CORPORATION, a Texas corporation, and, except as corrected
or supplemented in a subsequent covered report:

     o    no covered report contained an untrue statement of a material fact as
          of the end of the period covered by such report (or in the case of a
          report on Form 8-K or definitive proxy materials, as of the date on
          which it was filed); and

     o    no covered report omitted to state a material fact necessary to make
          the statements in the covered report, in light of the circumstances
          under which they were made, not misleading as of the end of the period
          covered by such report (or in the case of a report on Form 8-K or
          definitive proxy materials, as of the date on which it was filed).

     2. I have reviewed the contents of this statement with the Company's audit
committee.

     3. In this statement under oath, each of the following, if filed on or
before the date of this statement, is a "covered report":

     o    Annual Report of Encompass Services Corporation on Form 10-K for
          fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, filed on March 14, 2002;

     o    all reports on Form 10-Q, all reports on Form 8-K and all definitive
          proxy materials of Encompass Services Corporation filed with the
          Commission subsequent to the filing of the Form 10-K identified above;
          and

     o    any amendments to any of the foregoing.

By:       /s/ Joseph M. Ivey
    ----------------------------------
Name:    Joseph M. Ivey
Title:   President & Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 9, 2002


         Subscribed and sworn to before me this 9th day of August, 2002

                                        /s/Terri J. Allbright
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Notary Public
                                        My Commission Expires: January 22, 2005
# Official Journal L 277I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 277I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 642 August 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 277I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 642 August 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EU) 2021/1275 of 30 July 2021 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Lebanon | 1 |
| | * | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1276 of 30 July 2021 implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1716 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Nicaragua | 12 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1277 of 30 July 2021 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Lebanon | 16 |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1278 of 30 July 2021 amending Decision (CFSP) 2019/1720 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Nicaragua | 24 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EU) 2021/1275 of 30 July 2021 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Lebanon

1

*

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1276 of 30 July 2021 implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1716 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Nicaragua

12

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1277 of 30 July 2021 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Lebanon

16

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1278 of 30 July 2021 amending Decision (CFSP) 2019/1720 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Nicaragua

24

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 32.1


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, David M Long, Jnr., President and Chief Executive Officer, of Biofield Corp.
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended
June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: November 21, 2003                By: /s/ DAVID M. LONG
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           David M. Long, Jr., M.D., Ph.D.
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)


                                       22
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,277,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,036,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,493,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,251,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,076,000
<PP&E>                                       4,846,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,990,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,729,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,856,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    12,174,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     287,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,729,000
<SALES>                                     45,562,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            45,562,000
<CGS>                                       17,233,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,233,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            28,963,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               550,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             536,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,170,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (421,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (749,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (749,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          28,704
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,671
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               220,508
<PP&E>                                         453,004
<DEPRECIATION>                                 419,171
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 254,341
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          134,690
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        46,774
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,877
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   254,341
<SALES>                                        226,164
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               231,283
<CGS>                                          126,709
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  126,709
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               610,895
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (506,321)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (506,321)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (506,321)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 45 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 45

A resolution authorizing the use of the Capitol Rotunda on May 2, 1996, 
 for the presentation of the Congressional Gold Medal to Reverend and 
                           Mrs. Billy Graham.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 12, 1996

Mr. Dole (for himself and Mr. Helms) submitted the following concurrent 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
A resolution authorizing the use of the Capitol Rotunda on May 2, 1996, 
 for the presentation of the Congressional Gold Medal to Reverend and 
                           Mrs. Billy Graham.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the rotunda of the United States Capitol is hereby authorized to 
be used on May 2, 1996, at 2 o'clock post meridian for the presentation 
of the Congressional Gold Medal to Reverend and Mrs. Billy Graham. 
Physical preparations for the conduct of the ceremony shall be carried 
out in accordance with such conditions as may be prescribed by the 
Architect of the Capitol.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit
      32.1**


Section
      1350 Certifications





**STATEMENT
      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned is the Chief Executive and Financial Officer of Equicap, Inc. This
      Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002.
      This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Equicap,
      Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006





The
      undersigned certifies that such 10-QSB Report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and that the information contained in such 10-QSB Report fairly presents, in
      all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Equicap,
      Inc. as of September 30, 2006





This
      Certification is executed as of November 14, 2006.











*By:
      /s/Thomas W. Colligan*


*-----------------------------------------*


*Thomas
      W. Colligan*


*Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer*











A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      us, Inc. and will be retained by Equicap, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
consolidated financial statements of Ceramics Process Systems Corporation
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q for period
ending July 3, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-03-1999
<CASH>                                         1457913
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   559728
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     421629
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2471124
<PP&E>                                          860472
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1092062
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3340303
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           549202
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      12285969
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3340303
<SALES>                                        1421136
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1421136
<CGS>                                          1062085
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1299339
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 134110
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (15771)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             149881
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    149881
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 217

Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to the authority of the Federal

Communications Commission.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 11, 1998

Mr. TAUZIN (for himself, Mr. BOUCHER, Mr. LIVINGSTON, Mr. STEARNS, Mr.

KLUG, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. DEAL of Georgia, Mr. PAXON, Mrs. CUBIN,

Mr. HASTERT, Mr. OXLEY, Mr. BURR of North Carolina, and Mr.

ROGAN) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Commerce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to the

authority of the Federal Communications Commission.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—

3 (1) the Congress has never granted the Federal

4 Communications Commission the authority to com5 pel broadcast station licensees to provide free broad6 cast time for the airing of political advertising, other

7 than the specific equal time obligations of section

8 315 of the Communications Act of 1934;
2

•HCON 217 IH

1 (2) section 315 of that Act contains specific

2 and reasonable limits on the compensation that may

3 be required of political candidates for the airing of

4 political advertising that the Congress enacted as the

5 exclusive authority of the Commission with respect

6 to compensation for political advertising;

7 (3) the Commission may not further expand the

8 public interest obligations of broadcast station li9 censees to accept political advertising without ex10 press statutory authority from the Congress, and the

11 responsible weighing of the legal and economic prob12 lems that congressional consideration entails; and

13 (4) the Federal Communications Commission

14 should not engage in actions that would congest the

15 Federal courts with needless litigation concerning

16 the limits on the Commission’s authority, wasting

17 the congressionally appropriated resources of the

18 Commission, the Department of Justice, and the ju19 dicial branch.

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

**IN RE: ALEKSANDRA DZIKI :**

**:**

**: No. 60 WM 2016** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 28th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Revie w is**  GRANTED

**, conditioned upon the certification of Aleksandra Dziki b**  **y the Dean of the University of**

**Pennsylvania School of Law. See**  **Pa.B.A.R. 321(b). Such Rule 321(b) certification**

**shall be submitted within 30 days.**
#### Aristeo Palma MELCHOR, also known as Aristeo Palma, Petitioner v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent

No. 17-60232 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 16, 2018

Felipe D. J. Millan, El Paso, TX, for Petitioner

Gerald Mark Alexander, Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent

Before KING, ELROD, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. ■

PER CURIAM: *

Aristeo Palma Melchor (Palma), a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions this court for review of a decision from the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA), wherein the BIA dismissed Palma’s appeal from the Immigration Judge’s denial of his application for a waiver of removability. The Respondent moves for summary denial.

Palma argues in his petition for review that the BIA erroneously held that he did not raise a meaningful challenge to the immigration judge’s decision, incorrectly construed the arguments raised in his appellate brief, incorrectly determined that the immigration judge had found him statutorily eligible for a waiver, and committed legal error. As a result, Palma argues that the BIA failed to examine whether the immigration judge had erred in finding that he engaged in a polygamous relationship and in weighing the discretionary factors he presented in favor of waiver of removability. In light of the BIA’s failure to conduct a full appellate review, Palma argues that his due process rights were violated.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Palma’s claims of error in the BIA’s decisionmak-ing because he did not raise them first in a motion for reconsideration before the BIA. *See Omari v. Holder,*562 F.3d 314, 319-21 (5th Cir. 2009). Although Palma alleges a due process violation, he cannot escape the exhaustion requirement when there was an adequate mechanism for the BIA to address and remedy the purported errors. *See Roy v. Ashcroft,*389 F.3d 132, 137 (5th Cir. 2004).

Accordingly, Palma’s petition for review is DISMISSED. The Respondent’s motion is DENIED AS MOOT.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.