alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            55,655
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                           55,655
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                             55,655
<EQUITIES>                                       1,791
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  71,932
<CASH>                                           9,834
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              10,949
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           4,250
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 137,066
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 46,489
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             21,098
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  9,735
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,660
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,613
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   137,066
<PREMIUMS>                                      13,725
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              1,037
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                  10
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     209
<BENEFITS>                                       7,233
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      3,134
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             3,443
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,171
<INCOME-TAX>                                       343
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                828
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,795
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  37,057
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                              7,233
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                 967
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 6,132
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 37,191
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2014-5 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and
represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of
November 25, 2014, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2014-5 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the
Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Sandra M. BroderickName:

Sandra M. BroderickTitle:

EVP Head of OperationsDate:

March 29, 2019By:

/s/ Andrew KangName:

Andrew KangTitle:

TreasurerDate:

March 29, 2019
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 300 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 300

 To designate the week of November 3, 1996, as ``National Shaken Baby 
                       Syndrome Awareness Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 24, 1996

  Mr. Wellstone (for himself, Mr. Inouye, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Dodd, Mrs. 
  Frahm, Mr. Reid, Mr. Glenn, Mr. Exon, Mrs. Boxer, and Mr. Kennedy) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                            on the Judiciary

                           September 28, 1996

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To designate the week of November 3, 1996, as ``National Shaken Baby 
                       Syndrome Awareness Week''.

Whereas Shaken Baby Syndrome describes the consequences that occur when a young 
        child is violently shaken;
Whereas Shaken Baby Syndrome is so lethal that 20 to 25 percent of its victims 
        die, and most survivors suffer brain damage;
Whereas Shaken Baby Syndrome accounts for 10 to 12 percent of all child abuse 
        and neglect cases in the United States;
Whereas 25 to 50 percent of teenagers and adults do not know that shaking a baby 
        is dangerous;
Whereas education is the key to preventing this tragedy; and
Whereas the United States Senate has a continuing commitment to the health and 
        safety of this Nation's children: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate designates the week of November 3, 1996, 
as ``National Shaken Baby Syndrome Awareness Week''. The President is 
requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United 
States to observe such week with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Broadcaster, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Blair Mills, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |                                                                   
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ BLAIRMILLS                                                    
| | Blair Mills,
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)



Date: November 14, 2007



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DANIEL GANT,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 195 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 3rd day of October, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          14,953
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  177,280
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          95,033
<DEPRECIATION>                                (25,874)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 296,324
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        210,253
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        59,854
<OTHER-SE>                                     (9,730)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   296,324
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,607
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,714
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   948
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,685
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    503
<INCOME-TAX>                                       207
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                296
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          236
<NET-INCOME>                                        60
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-2104

___________

Irakli Bregvadze, *

*

Petitioner, *

* Petition for Review

v. * of an Order of the

* Board of Immigration Appeals.

Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of *

the United States of America, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Respondent. *

___________

Submitted: October 6, 2006

Filed: October 23, 2006

___________

Before SMITH, MAGILL, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Irakli Bregvadze, a citizen of Georgia, petitions for review of an order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) which affirmed an Immigration Judge’s (IJ’s)

denial of his motion to reopen removal proceedings. In February 2000 the former

Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) charged Bregvadze with being

removable and, in March 2000, he was ordered removed in absentia after he failed to

appear for his removal hearing. Four years later, in March 2004, he moved to reopen,

but the IJ denied the motion as untimely, and the BIA adopted and affirmed the IJ’s

decision.
-2-

After careful review of the record, we conclude the BIA did not abuse its

discretion in affirming the IJ’s denial of the motion to reopen as untimely. See 8

U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(5)(C) (motion to reopen in absentia removal proceeding may be

brought at any time if alien demonstrates he did not receive proper notice of the

hearing; otherwise motion must be filed within 180 days after date of removal order);

Haider v. Gonzales, 438 F.3d 902, 906-08 (8th Cir. 2006) (BIA did not abuse its

discretion in denying untimely-filed motion to reopen where alien was personally

served with Notice to Appear, putting him on notice of the removal proceedings

including his obligation to keep his address updated, and a subsequent Notice of

Hearing, containing time and date information, was mailed to him at his listed address;

alien’s assertion that he did not receive the Notice of Hearing as he had moved did not

provide grounds for reopening because he failed to update his address); Iavorski v.

INS, 232 F.3d 124, 134 (2d Cir. 2000) (2-year delay between alien’s in absentia

removal hearing and his next effort towards investigating his claim reflected lack of

diligence not warranting equitable tolling of limitations period for filing motion to

reopen).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review.

______________________________
To:

Cc:

Bcc:

Subject: Fw: RAYTHEON (TUCSON) WAIVER REQUEST FOR NON-TSO TRANSPONDER

Mr. Shaver,

 Raytheon would like to withdraw its request for a waiver for a non-TSO transponder in its unmanned 

aircraft. I apologize for the inconvenience.

Regards,

Gregg

Gregg L George

Engineering

E2F-Lab Operations Hangar

Missile Systems

Raytheon Company

+1 520.794.2777 (office)

+1 520.203.1786 (cell)

+1 520.794.2465 (fax)

Gregg_George@raytheon.com

1151 E. Hermans

Tucson, Arizona 85734-1337 USA

www.raytheon.com

This message contains information that may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive 

mail for the addressee), you should not use, copy or disclose to anyone this message or any information contained in this message. 

If you have received this message in error, please so advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for 

your cooperation.

Frances.M.Shaver@faa.gov

02/17/2011 12:42 PM

To Gregg George <Gregg_George@raytheon.com>

cc Tyneka.L.Thomas@faa.gov

Subject Re: RAYTHEON (TUCSON) WAIVER REQUEST FOR NON-TSO TRANSPONDER

Good Afternoon Mr. George,

Your petition has been sent to the docket. It will receive it's own docket number. 

Due to processing, it will take a few days to show up.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference of the Committee on Oversight for the transaction of National Science Board business pursuant to the NSF Act and the Government in the Sunshine Act.

# TIME AND DATE: 

Monday, April 4, 2022, from 2:00-3:00 p.m. EDT.

# PLACE: 

This meeting will be held by teleconference organized through the National Science Foundation.

# STATUS: 

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

The agenda is: Committee Chair's Opening Remarks; Discussion of Vision for Facilitating the Broader Impacts of the Cutting-Edge Science and Engineering Funded by NSF.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

                        Point of contact for this meeting is: Chris Blair,                         *cblair@nsf.gov,*                         703/292-7000. Members of the public can observe this meeting through a You Tube livestream. The link is                         *https://youtu.be/​sWEkXQX-da8.*

                        Meeting information is available from the NSB website at                         *https://www.nsf.gov/​nsb/​meetings/​index.jsp#up.*

Chris Blair,

Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.

[FR Doc. 2022-06822 Filed 3-28-22; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             886
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,602
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,157
<INVENTORY>                                        204
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,442
<PP&E>                                           6,029
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,305
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,431
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        28,059
<OTHER-SE>                                    (42,752)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,133
<SALES>                                          2,968
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,901
<CGS>                                              242
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,295
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,163
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 643
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,587)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         7
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,594)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,594)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.77)


</TABLE>
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 97

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the alternative minimum tax

requiring all corporations and individuals with substantial economic income to pay at least a minimum amount of taxes should be retained.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 12, 1997

Mr. HINCHEY (for himself, Mr. BONIOR, Mr. OBEY, Mr. SPRATT, Mr. EVANS,

Mr. CLAY, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. WYNN, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. SERRANO, Ms.

DEGETTE, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. FATTAH, Mr. FILNER, Ms. SLAUGHTER,

Ms. WATERS, Mr. DELAHUNT, Mrs. MEEK of Florida, and Mr. NADLER)

submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the alternative

minimum tax requiring all corporations and individuals

with substantial economic income to pay at least a minimum amount of taxes should be retained.

Whereas a fundamental principle of the American tax system

is to raise revenue on individuals and corporations in relation to their ability to pay;

Whereas a fundamental principle of the American tax system

is to encourage certain types of economic activities beneficial to society through the creation of various tax preferences;
2

HCON 97 IH

Whereas these two fundamental principles conflict when tax

preferences are abused by individuals and corporations to

entirely avoid tax liability;

Whereas the public good is harmed in instances in which corporations and individuals with substantial economic income pay little or no taxes;

Whereas the alternative minimum tax was created under section 55 of the Internal Revenue Code on a bipartisan

basis in 1986 to ensure that no taxpayer with substantial

economic income avoids significant tax liability by using

exclusions, deductions, and credits;

Whereas the alternative minimum tax requires thousands of

profitable corporations and individuals to pay Federal income taxes each year that would otherwise have little or

no tax liability;

Whereas the alternative minimum tax has resulted in over

$40 billion revenues since its enactment;

Whereas small businesses are protected from tax liability

under the alternative minimum tax due to the $40,000

exemption;

Whereas the alternative minimum tax was recently improved

and streamlined by Congress under the Omnibus Budget

Reconciliation Act of 1993;

Whereas repeal of the alternative minimum tax would allow

thousands of large, profitable firms to evade paying any

income taxes in a given year;

Whereas repeal of the alternative minimum tax would deplete

the Treasury of an estimated $34 billion over 10 years

according to the House-Senate Joint Committee on Taxation; and
3

HCON 97 IH

Whereas stories of wealthy corporations and individuals who

escape paying income taxes would reduce the willingness

of other taxpayers to comply with tax laws: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the current alternative minimum tax on

3 profitable individuals and corporations should remain

4 wholly intact as part of the Tax Code.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Broadcaster, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Blair Mills, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|                                                                  
|/s/ Blair Mills                                                   
|Blair Mills,
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)



Date:  November 14, 2008







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.