UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Regulatory Docket No. _______________ 

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR EXEMPTION OF: 

BILLY R. COOK JR.

FOR AN EXEMPTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 14 OF THE 

CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), AND 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL 

OPERATION OF DJI PHANTOM 3, LILY 1, AND DJI INSPIRE 1 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT 

SYSTEMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE FAA MODERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT 

OF 2012 (PUBLIC LAW 112-95) 

Submitted on July 13, 2015 

 

 

BILLY R. COOK JR.

1853 Palomino Trail

Suffolk, VA 23432

757-255-8486
TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Page 

GLOSSARY OF 

ABBREVIATIONS.................................................................................................................3 

SUMMARY............................................................................................................................. 4 

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF PETITIONER......................................................4 

BACKGROUND.....................................................................................................................5 

BASIS FOR PETITION...........................................................................................................5 

NAME AND ADDRESS OF PETITIONER................................................................6 

THE SPECIFIC SECTIONS OF 14 C.F.R. FROM WHICH 

BILLY R. COOK JR. SEEKS EXEMPTION........................................................7 

THE EXTENT OF RELIEF BILLY R. COOK JR. SEEKS AND 

THE REASON BILLY R. COOK JR. SEEKS THE RELIEF........................9

 

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING BILLY R. COOK JR. REQUEST

WOULD BE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST .............................................................10

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING THE EXEMPTION WOULD NOT 

ADVERSELY AFFECT SAFETY..............................................................................12 

CONCLUSION.......................................................................................................................19 

 
GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS

AGL Above Ground Level 

AOI Area of Interest 

ATC Air Traffic Control 

ATO Air Traffic Organization

AV Aerial Vehicle 

CFR Code of Federal Regulations 

COA Certificate of Authorization 

FAA Federal Aviation Administration 

FAR Federal Aviation Regulation 

GCS Ground Control Station 

GPS Global Positioning System 

LOL Loss of Link 

NAS National Airspace System 

NOTAM Notice to Airman 

PIC Pilot In Command 

Section 333 FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) 

SO Safety Observer 

SOP Standard Operating Procedures 

UA Unmanned Aircraft 

UAS Unmanned Aircraft System 

VFR Visual Flight Rules 

VLOS Visual Line of Site 

VMC Visual Meteorological Conditions 

VTOL Vertical Takeoff and Landing 

DJI UAV manufacturer

ESC Electronic speed control

FPV First Person View 

LI-PO Lithium Polymer battery

RCV Radio Controlled vehicle 
 

SUMMARY

BILLY R. COOK JR. seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 

91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), to operate an 

Unmanned Aircraft System pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 

(FMRA). This exemption will permit BILLY R. COOK JR. to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System 

(UAS) for the commercial purpose of conducting aerial video and photography for marketing, film sets, 

real estate photography, commercials, special events, wedding cinematography, and landscape over 

certain areas of the United States. 

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF THE PETITIONER

My name is BILLY R. COOK JR., and I am a retired Air Traffic Controller and drone operator (pilot) 

with expertise and knowledge in aspects of building programing and operating multiple types of UAS'S 

along with camera set up and operation. My operation will provide clients with the highest quality 

digital content for use in their commercial, personal, and non-profit multimedia projects. BILLY R. 

COOK JR. has 34 years of Air Traffic/Airspace experience as well as a lifetime of radio controlled 

(RC) aircraft experience. 

The objective of BILLY R. COOK JR.’ aerial video and photography operations is to provide high 

quality imaging for a variety of commercial, public, and residential uses. It is imperative that operations 

be conducted a safe location away from all obstacles and people at all times. BILLY R. COOK JR. will 

also provide knowledge of UAS and promote safe UAS operations. 
BACKGROUND 

Unmanned Aircraft Systems: DJI Phantom 3, DJI Inspire 1 UASs, and Lily UAS

BILLY R. COOK JR. seeks an exemption to operate DJI systems for compensation or hire within the 

NAS. The DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 are vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) 

Unmanned Aircraft (UA) with a Ground Control Station (GCS) utilizing electronic tablet or smart 

phone systems. The DJI Phantom 3 has a maximum gross weight of approximately 2 pounds 14 

ounces, while having a length of 16 inches width of 16 inches, height of 8 inches, and a maximum 

speed of approximately 29 knots. The DJI Inspire 1 has a maximum gross weight of 6 pounds 7.5 

ounces, a length of 17.3 inches, width of 17.7 inches, height of 11.8 inches, and a maximum speed of 

approximately 42 knots. The DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UAs are equipped with four 

main rotors; driven by Lithium Polymer battery powered electric motors. The Lily UAS operates as a 

“tag along” camera and remains within 30 meters of the operator at all times.

The DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UAs that will be operated by BILLY R. COOK JR. will 

be registered in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 44103, Registration of Aircraft, as well as 14 C.F.R Part 47, 

Aircraft Registration, and marked in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 45, Identification and Registration 

Markings. 

BASIS FOR PETITION 

Petitioner, BILLY R. COOK JR., pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 

C.F.R. § 11.61) and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), Section 333, Special 

Rules for Certain Unmanned Aircraft Systems, hereby petitions the Administrator to commercially 

operate the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UASs in the National Airspace System (NAS), 

and for an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121,

91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). 

In consideration of the speed, weight, size, and limited operating area associated with the unmanned 

aircraft and its operation, BILLY R. COOK JR. operation of DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 

UASs meets the conditions of FMRA Section 333 and therefore, will not require an airworthiness 

certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. 

Accordingly, BILLY R. COOK JR. requests relief from Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) 

& (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), as these sections set forth requirements for maintenance that only apply 

to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate. 

BILLY R. COOK JR. submits that the requested relief is proper since an equivalent level of safety will 

be ensured. BILLY R. COOK JR. will use experienced personnel or technicians to perform 

maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UASs using the methods, techniques, and 

practices prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3, 

Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction Manual). Furthermore, BILLY R. COOK JR. will document and 

maintain all maintenance records for the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UASs. 

Relief from certain requirements of Section 61.113(a) and (b), entitled Private pilot privileges and 

limitations: Pilot in command, is requested by BILLY R. COOK JR. to the extent necessary to allow a 

Pilot in Command (PIC) holding a private pilot or higher level certificate, as well as an airman medical 
certificate, and who has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight- hour and currency requirements, 

that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UASs in a manner 

consistent with this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining 

appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. 

BILLY R. COOK JR. seeks relief from Section 91.7(a), entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, because 

the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UASs do not require an airworthiness certificate in 

accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. As such, BILLY R. COOK JR. submits that he will 

ensure that the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1UASs are in an airworthy condition, prior to 

every flight, by determining that the UASs are in compliance with the operating documents (i.e., 

Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3, Lily1, and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction Manual), and that 

the aircraft are in a condition for safe flight. 

BILLY R. COOK JR. also seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.121, entitled 

Altimeter Settings, as the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UAs will not have a typical 

barometric altimeter onboard. However, altitude information of the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI 

Inspire 1UAs will be provided to the PIC via Global Positioning System (GPS) equipment and radio 

communications telemetry data link, which downlinks from the UA to the GCS for active monitoring of 

the flight path. This altitude information, combined with BILLY R. COOK JR. operation of the DJI 

Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UASs within visual line of sight, at or below 500 feet AGL, will 

ensure a level of safety equivalent to Section 91.121. 

Additionally, BILLY R. COOK JR. seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.151(b), 

entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions. BILLY R. COOK JR. submits that safety will 

not be affected by operation of the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UAs during daylight hours 

in visual meteorological conditions (VMC) under visual flight rules (VFR), with enough battery power 

to fly for a total duration of approximately 15.5 minutes to the first point of intended landing and, 

assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 4.5 minutes. 

In accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 11.81, BILLY R. COOK JR. provides the following information in 

support of its petition for exemption: 

A. Name And Address Of The Petitioner.

The name and address of the Petitioner and point of contact is:

BILLY R. COOK JR.

2891 ROUTE 22

PATTERSON, NY 12563

(813)-313-9939

 Email: jaromirrivera@gmail.com
B. The Specific Sections Of 14 C.F.R. from Which BILLY R. COOK JR. Seeks Exemption.

1. BILLY R. COOK JR. Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 61.113(a) And 

(b).

Section 61.113, entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command, Subsections 

(a) and (b) prescribe the following, in relevant part:

a. No person who holds a private pilot certificate may act as a pilot in command (PIC) of 

an aircraft that is carrying passengers or property for compensation or hire; nor may that 

person, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft. 

b. A private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in connection 

with any business or employment if— 

i. The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and

ii. The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire. 

2. BILLY R. COOK JR. Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7(a). 

Section 91.7, entitled civil aircraft airworthiness, subsection (a), states the following: (a) No 

person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in an airworthy condition.

3. BILLY R. COOK JR. Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121. 

Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings, subsection (a), states the following, in part:

a. Each person operating an aircraft shall maintain the cruising altitude or flight level of 

that aircraft, as the case may be, by reference to an altimeter that is set, 

when operating-- 

Below 18,000 feet MSL, to—

i. The current reported altimeter setting of a station along the route and within 100 

nautical miles of the aircraft;

ii. If there is no station within the area prescribed in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this 

section, the current reported altimeter setting of an appropriate available station; 

iii. In the case of an aircraft not equipped with a radio, the elevation of the departure 

airport or an appropriate altimeter setting available before departure.

4. BILLY R. COOK JR. Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.151(b). 

Section 91.151, entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions, subsection (b), states 

the following: 

(b) No person may begin a flight in a rotorcraft under VFR conditions unless (considering wind 

and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended 

landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 20 minutes.

5. BILLY R. COOK JR. Seeks Exemption From The Requirement Of Section 91.405(a).

Section 91.405, entitled Maintenance required, subsection (a), states the following: Each owner 

or operator of an aircraft— 

(a) Shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between 

required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies 

repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter[.] 

6. BILLY R. COOK JR. Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.407(a)

Section 91.407, entitled Operation after maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or 

alteration, subsection (a)(1), states the following: (a) No person may operate any aircraft that 

has undergone maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration unless-- (1) It 

has been approved for return to service by a person authorized under § 43.7 of this chapter [.]

7. BILLY R. COOK JR. Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.409(a)(1) 

And 91.409(a)(2). 
Section 91.409, entitled Inspections, subsection (a), states the following: 

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no person may operate an aircraft unless, 

within the preceding 12 calendar months, it has had -- 

(1) An annual inspection in accordance with part 43 of this chapter and has been approved for 

return to service by a person authorized by § 43.7 of this chapter; or 

(2) An inspection for the issuance of an airworthiness certificate in accordance with part 21 of 

this chapter. 

8. BILLY R. COOK JR. Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.417(a) 

And 91.417(b). 

Section 91.417, entitled Maintenance records, subsections (a) and (b), state the following: 

a. Except for work performed in accordance with §§ 91.411 and 91.413, each registered 

owner or operator shall keep the following records for the periods specified in paragraph 

(b) of this section: Records of the maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alteration 

and records of the 100-hour, annual, progressive, and other required or approved 

inspections, as appropriate, for each aircraft (including the airframe) and each engine, 

propeller, rotor, and appliance of an aircraft. The records must include—

i. A description (or reference to data acceptable to the Administrator) of the work 

performed; and

ii. The date of completion of the work performed; and

iii. The signature, and certificate number of the person approving the aircraft for 

return to service.

Records containing the following information:

1. The total time in service of the airframe, each engine, each propeller, and 

each rotor.

2. The current status of life-limited parts of each airframe, engine, propeller, 

rotor, and appliance. 

3. The time since last overhaul of all items installed on the aircraft which 

are required to be overhauled on a specified time basis. 

4. The current inspection status of the aircraft, including the time since the 

last inspection required by the inspection program under which the 

aircraft and its appliances are maintained. 

5. The current status of applicable airworthiness directives (AD) and safety 

directives including, for each, the method of compliance, the AD or 

safety directive number and revision date. If the AD or safety directive 

involves recurring action, the time and date when the next action is 

required. 

6. Copies of the forms prescribed by § 43.9(d) of this chapter for each major 

alteration to the airframe and currently installed engines, rotors, 

propellers, and appliances. 

b. The owner or operator shall retain the following records for the periods prescribed: 

i. The records specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be retained until 

the work is repeated or superseded by other work or for 1 year after the work is 

performed. 

ii. The records specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall be retained and 

transferred with the aircraft at the time the aircraft is sold. 

iii. A list of defects furnished to a registered owner or operator under § 43.11 of this 

chapter shall be retained until the defects are repaired and the aircraft is 

approved for return to service. 
C. The Extent Of Relief BILLY R. COOK JR. Seeks And The Reason BILLY R. COOK JR.

Seeks The Relief. 

1. Extent Of Relief BILLY R. COOK JR. Seeks And The Reason BILLY R. COOK JR. Seeks 

Relief From Section 61.113(a) And (b). 

Relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in 

command, is requested to the extent necessary to allow a PIC holding a private pilot or higher 

level certificate, as well as a current and valid airman medical certificate, and who has met 

certain flight-hour and currency requirements, to conduct the proposed UAS flight operations 

for compensation or hire. 

This relief is requested since the limitations set forth in Section 61.113(a) and (b) state that a 

private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in connection with any 

business or employment if: (1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and 

(2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire. 

As set forth more fully below, BILLY R. COOK JR. submits that an equivalent level of safety 

will be maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS or DJI 

Inspire 1 UAS unless that PIC has met certain flight-hour and currency requirements, 

demonstrating that the PIC is able to safely operate either the DJI Phantom 3 or DJI Inspire 1 

UAS in a manner consistent with the operations specifications as described in this exemption, 

including evasive and emergency maneuvers, as well as maintaining appropriate distances from 

people, vessels, vehicles and structures. 

Further, BILLY R. COOK JR. submits that all flights of the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI 

Inspire 1 UASs, conducted by the PIC pursuant to the grant of this Petition: (1) will be 

incidental to BILLY R. COOK JR.' business; and (2) will not carry passengers or property for 

compensation or hire.

2. Extent Of Relief BILLY R. COOK JR. Seeks And The Reason BILLY R. COOK JR. Seeks 

Relief From Section 91.7(a).

Relief from Section 91.7(a) entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, is requested to the extent 

required to allow BILLY R. COOK JR. to determine that the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI 

Inspire 1 UASs are in airworthy condition prior to every flight by ensuring that the UAS is in 

compliance with the operating documents (i.e., BILLY R. COOK JR. Aerial Operations Manual, 

Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction Manual). 

BILLY R. COOK JR. seeks the requested relief because the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI 

Inspire 1 UASs do not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 

21, Subpart H. Therefore, BILLY R. COOK JR. will ensure that the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and 

DJI Inspire 1 UASs are in airworthy condition based upon its compliance with the operating 

documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 

Instruction Manual) prior to every flight, and further, determine that the aircraft are in condition 

for safe flight, as stated in the conditions and limitations below.

3. Extent Of Relief BILLY R. COOK JR. Seeks And The Reason BILLY R. COOK JR. Seeks 

Relief From Section 91.121.

Relief from Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings, may be required to allow flight 

operations of the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UASs, which utilize a barometric 

pressure sensor, GPS equipment, and a radio communications telemetry data link to downlink 

altitude information from the UA to the PIC at the ground control station (GCS). Since the FAA 

requires that any altitude information concerning UAS operations be reported to air traffic 

control (ATC) in feet above ground level (AGL), BILLY R. COOK JR. seeks the requested 

relief because the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UA’s altimeter may be set on the 
ground to zero feet AGL, rather than the local barometric pressure or field altitude, before each 

flight.

Considering the limited altitude of the proposed operations, relief from 14 CFR 91.121 is 

sought to the extent necessary to comply with the applicable conditions and limitations stated 

below. As more fully set forth herein, an equivalent level of safety will be maintained since the 

DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UAs are equipped with a barometric pressure sensor 

and GPS equipment, which automatically ensures that a ground level pressure setting will be 

established prior to each flight, and provides the PIC with altitude information of the UA on the 

heads-up display of the GCS. 

4. Extent Of Relief BILLY R. COOK JR. Seeks And The Reason BILLY R. COOK JR. Seeks 

Relief From Section 91.151(b). 

Relief from Section 91.151(b) entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions, is 

requested to the extent required to allow flights of the battery powered DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, 

and DJI Inspire 1 UAs during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under 

visual flight rules (VFR), for a total duration of 15.5 minutes to the first point of intended 

landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 4.5 minutes. BILLY R. 

COOK JR. seeks the requested relief because without an exemption from Section 91.151(b), the 

flight time duration of the battery powered DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UAs will 

severely constrain the practicality of any aerial video or still photo flight operations that BILLY 

R. COOK JR. proposes to conduct pursuant to this Petition.

Significantly, as set forth below, the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and 

DJI Inspire 1 UASs, the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 operating documents, and 

BILLY R. COOK JR. proposed operating limitations, ensure that BILLY R. COOK JR. will 

safely operate the battery powered DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UAs during 

daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), with 

enough battery power to fly for a total duration of 13.5 minutes to the first point of intended 

landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 4.5 minutes. 

5. Extent Of Relief BILLY R. COOK JR. Seeks And The Reason BILLY R. COOK JR. Seeks 

Relief From Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b).

Since Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) only apply 

to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, BILLY R. COOK JR. requests relief from these 

Sections because the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UASs do not require 

airworthiness certificates. As set forth more fully below, the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI 

Inspire 1 UASs meet the conditions of FMRA Section 333 for operation without an 

airworthiness certificate.

Accordingly, BILLY R. COOK JR. will use trained technicians to perform maintenance, 

alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UASs using the methods, techniques, and 

practices prescribed in the UAS operating documents (i.e., BILLY R. COOK JR. Aerial 

Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 

Instruction Manual). Furthermore, BILLY R. COOK JR. will document and maintain all 

maintenance records for the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UASs. 

D. The Reasons Why Granting BILLY R. COOK JR. Request Would Be In The Public Interest:

That Is, How It Would Benefit The Public As A Whole.

Granting the present Petition will further the public interest by allowing BILLY R. 

COOK JR. to safely, efficiently, and economically perform aerial video and photography of 

construction sites, real estate, and landscape over certain areas of the United States.

Additionally, use of the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UASs will decrease 
congestion of the NAS, reduce pollution, crashes and accidents caused by pilot error and 

provide significant benefits to the economy. Notably, the benefits of BILLY R. COOK JR.’ 

proposed operation of the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UASs will be realized 

without implicating any privacy issues.

1. The Public Will Benefit From Decreased Congestion Of The NAS.

The DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UAs are battery powered and serve as a safe, 

efficient, and economical alternative to the manned aircraft traditionally utilized to obtain aerial 

imagery. By reducing the amount of manned aircraft needed to perform aerial acquisitions, an 

exemption allowing the use of a DJI Phantom 3 or DJI Inspire 1 UAS would reduce the amount 

of manned aircraft in the NAS, reduce noise and air pollution, as well as increase the safety of 

life and property in the air and on the ground. 

Furthermore, by reducing the number of manned aircraft operating in the NAS, congestion 

around airports caused by arriving and departing aircraft will be reduced. The DJI Phantom 3, 

Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UAs do not require an airport to takeoff or land. Likewise, a reduction 

of manned aircraft conducting aerial video and photography missions would result in fewer 

aircraft that must be handled by air traffic control during the ground, takeoff, departure, arrival, 

and landing phases of flight operations. 

2. The Public Will Benefit From The Safety And Efficiency Of The DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, 

and DJI Inspire 1 UASs. 

Conducting aerial acquisitions with the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UASs, instead 

of manned aircraft, will greatly benefit the public by drastically reducing the levels of air 

and noise pollution generated during traditional aerial video and still photography flight 

operations. By using battery power and electric motors, the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI 

Inspire 1 UASs produce no air pollution, and is the most viable environmentally conscious 

alternative to the cabin class, six cylinder internal combustion engine aircraft that are typically

utilized for aerial video and photography, while burning approximately 20-30 gallons per hour 

of leaded aviation fuel. The DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UAs, while reducing the 

carbon footprint of aerial acquisitions, also eliminates noise pollution, as the UAs are propelled 

by battery powered electric motors, rather than an internal combustion engine. 

By using the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UASs to perform aerial acquisitions, the 

substantial risk to life and property in the air and on the ground, which is usually associated 

with traditional manned aircraft flight operations, will be substantially reduced or completely 

eliminated. Aside from the lack of flight crew members located onboard the aircraft, the DJI 

Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UAs (weighing approximately 2 pounds 14 ounces and 6 

pounds 7.5 ounces respectively, at their maximum gross weights with lengths of 16 inches and 

17.3 inches respectively, widths of 16 inches and 17.7 inches respectively, and with no fuel on 

board), has less physical potential for collateral damage to life and property on the ground, and 

in the air, compared to the manned aircraft that typically conduct similar operations (weighing 

approximately 6,000 pounds with a wingspan of approximately 42 feet, a length of 34 feet, and 

a fuel capacity of 180 gallons).

3. Performing Aerial Video and Photography Operations With The DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, 

and DJI Inspire 1 UASs Will Benefit The Economy.

In addition to being safe and efficient, the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UASs are 

also an economical alternative to using manned aircraft to conduct similar aerial 

operations. As such, operation of the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UASs 

will allow United States based companies, like Fiquett Drones, to remain competitive and 

contribute to growth of the U.S. economy. Specifically, with the rising cost of aviation fuel and 

the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) regulatory actions phasing out leaded aviation 

fuels, U.S. owned and operated companies must adopt new and alternative technology in order 
to remain competitive. Operating the battery powered DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 

UASs is one such technology that not only allows companies greater operational flexibility

compared to manned aircraft, but provides such flexibility without the high operational cost of a 

traditional manned aircraft.

By operating the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UASs, companies such as Fiquett 

Drones, and Lily Robotics can remain competitive and profitable, and therefore, provide greater 

job stability to employees and contractors, which will ultimately contribute to growth of the 

U.S. economy. Improved financial performance of U.S. companies, through commercial use of 

the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UASs, provides a stable workforce that increases 

consumer spending; improves local, state, and federal tax revenues; and allows companies to 

invest in research and development in order to remain competitive both in the United States and 

abroad. 

4. There Are No Privacy Issues.

Similar to the manned aerial acquisition flight operations that have been conducted for decades, 

BILLY R. COOK JR. proposed operation of the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 

UASs would not implicate any privacy issues. Specifically, the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI 

Inspire 1 UASs will be operated only in compliance with operating documents (i.e., BILLY R. 

COOK JR. Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, 

and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction Manual) which requires property owner involvement as well as 

local law enforcement notification, and in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations, 

including the minimum altitude requirements of 14 C.F.R. § 91.119. 

E. The Reasons Why Granting The Exemption Would Not Adversely Affect Safety, Or How The 

Exemption Would Provide A Level Of Safety At Least Equal To That Provided By The Rule 

From Which BILLY R. COOK JR. Seeks Exemption. 

1. Reasons Why The DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UAs Meet The Conditions Of 

The FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333.

In consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the 

unmanned aircraft and its operation, BILLY R. COOK JR.’ operation of the DJI Phantom 3, 

Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UASs meet the conditions of FMRA Section 333, and will not require 

an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Section 333 

provides authority for a UAS to operate without airworthiness certification and sets forth 

requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the 

public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security. Specifically, FMRA Section 333 states 

the following, in part: 

a. In General. --Notwithstanding any other requirement of this subtitle, and not later than 

180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall 

determine if certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national 

airspace system before completion of the plan and rulemaking required by section 332 

of this Act or the guidance required by section 334 of this Act.

b. Assessment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems. --In making the determination under 

subsection (a), the Secretary shall determine, at a minimum—

i. Which types of unmanned aircraft systems, if any, as a result of their size, 

weight, speed, operational capability, proximity to airports and populated areas, 

and operation within visual line of sight do not create a hazard to users of the 

national airspace system or the public or pose a threat to national security; and 

whether a certificate of waiver, certificate of authorization, or airworthiness 
certification under section 44704 of title 49, United States Code, is required for 

the operation of unmanned aircraft systems identified under paragraph (1).

c. Requirements for Safe Operation. --If the Secretary determines under this section that 

certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system, 

the Secretary shall establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems 

in the national airspace system.

In seeking this exemption, BILLY R. COOK JR. submits that the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, 

and DJI Inspire 1 UASs can operate safely in the NAS pursuant to FMRA Section 333, 

as demonstrated by: (a) the characteristics of the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 

1 UASs; (b) the pilot certification requirement; and (c) the specific operating 

limitations. 

i. The Specifications Of The DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UASs 

Demonstrate Its Safe Characteristics.

The DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UASs do not create a hazard to 

users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security 

considering its size, weight, speed, and operational capability. 

ii. Technical Specifications Of The DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 

UASs.

The DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 Specifications and Data Sheet, 

attached hereto as Appendix A and B, set the technical specifications of the DJI 

Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UASs forth. 

iii. The DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UASs Autonomous Flight 

And Navigation Modes Enable The UASs To Remain Within A Defined 

Operational Area. 

The DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UASs may be operated in both 

manual and fully autonomous flight modes. A complete description of the flight

and navigational modes of the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UASs is 

provided at pages 25-35 of the DJI Phantom 3 and pages 12-16 and 45-50 of the 

DJI Inspire 1 User Manuals, attached hereto as Exhibit C and D. 

iv. The DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UASs Are Designed For 

Automatic Return To Home Point Or Hover In The Event Of Loss Of The 

Control Link Or Navigation.

When the Control Link is lost, the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 

UAs will remain stationary, in flight, for 3 seconds or more. If, after 3 seconds, 

the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UAs do not reacquire control link 

data from the GCS, the UAs will assume that the Control Link is lost and the 

UAs will return to the home position (i.e., failsafe mode) via GPS, and will 

descend to the takeoff position and shutdown. 

A complete description of the Failsafe Functions of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS are 

set forth at pages 27 through 29 and for the DJI Inspire 1 at pages 13 through 15 

of the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 User Manuals, attached hereto 

as Exhibit C and D.

v. The DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 GCS And It’s Operation.

A complete description of the operation and specifications of the DJI Phantom 3, 

Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 GCS and flight control software is provided at pages 

32 through 43 of the DJI Phantom 3 User Manual and pages 40 through 47 of the 

DJI Inspire 1 User Manual. DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 User 

Manuals are attached hereto as Exhibits C and D.
vi. Flight Operations Of DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UASs Are 

Limited To The Line Of Sight Of A Certificated Pilot in Command With A 

Safety Observer. 

BILLY R. COOK JR. will only utilize certificated pilots who possess a current 

and valid airman medical certificate to act as a pilot in command (PIC) of the 

DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UASs. Additionally, a safety observer 

will assist all pilots during flight time. 

vii. Flights Of DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UASs Will Be 

Conducted Pursuant To Specific Operating Limitations. 

In seeking this exemption, BILLY R. COOK JR. proposes to commercially 

operate DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UASs for the special purpose 

of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of United States, 

pursuant to the following specific operating limitations:

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption will be limited to the 

following aircraft described in the operating documents, rotorcraft UASs 

weighing less than 55 pounds maximum gross weight: DJI Phantom 3, 

Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Proposed 

operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to 

amend this grant. 

2. UAS operations under this exemption will be limited to conducting 

operations for the purpose of aerial video and photography. 

3. The UAs may not be flown at an indicated airspeed exceeding 20 knots.

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 500 feet above 

ground level (AGL), as indicated by the procedures specified in the 

operating documents unless a special request is made and approved by 

ATC. All altitudes reported to ATC must be in feet AGL.

5. The UAs must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC 

at all times. This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided 

by any device other than corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s 

FAA-issued airman medical certificate. 

6. The use of first person view (FPV) by the PIC or safety observer (SO) is 

not permitted. 

7. All operations must utilize a safety observer (SO). The SO may be used 

to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains 

VLOS capability. The SO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally 

at all times. Electronic messaging or texting is not permitted during 

flight operations. The PIC must be designated before the flight and 

cannot transfer his or her designation for the duration of the flight. The 

PIC must ensure that the SO can perform the functions prescribed in the 

operating documents. 

8. The SO must not perform any other duties beyond assisting the PIC with 

seeing and avoiding other air traffic and other ground based 

obstacles/obstructions and is not permitted to operate the camera or other 

instruments. 

9. The operating documents and the grant of exemption must be accessible 

during UAS operations and made available to the Administrator upon 

request. If a discrepancy exists between the conditions and 

limitations contained in the grant of exemption and the procedures 

outlined in the operating documents, the conditions and limitations 
contained in the grant of exemption take precedence and must be 

followed. Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined 

in its operating documents. The operator may update or revise its 

operating documents. It is the operator’s responsibility to track such 

revisions and present updated and revised documents to the 

Administrator upon request. 

The operator must also present updated and revised documents if it 

petitions for extension or amendment to the grant of exemption. If the 

operator determines that any update or revision would affect the basis 

upon which the FAA granted the exemption, then the operator must 

petition for amendment to its grant of exemption. The FAA’s UAS 

Integration Office (AFS-80) may be contacted if questions arise 

regarding updates or revisions to the operating documents.

10. Prior to each flight the PIC must inspect the UAS to ensure that it is in a 

condition f or safe flight. If the inspection reveals a condition that 

affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is prohibited from 

operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the 

UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight. The Ground Control 

Station must be included in the preflight inspection. All maintenance and 

alterations must be properly documented in the aircraft records.

11. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the 

UAS operation or flight characteristics, e.g. replacement of a flight 

critical component, must undergo a functional test flight. The PIC who 

conducts the functional test flight must make an entry in the aircraft 

records. 

12. The pre-flight inspection must account for all potential discrepancies, e.g. 

inoperable components, items, or equipment, not already covered in the 

relevant sections of the operating documents. 

13. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s aircraft/component, 

maintenance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit 

requirements.

14. The operator must carry out its maintenance, inspections, and record 

keeping requirements, in accordance with the operating documents. 

Maintenance, inspection, alterations, and status of replacement/overhaul 

component parts must be noted in the aircraft records, including total 

time in service, description of work accomplished, and the signature of 

the authorized person returning the UAS to service.

15. Each UASs operated under this exemption must comply with all 

manufacturer Safety Bulletins. 

16. The authorized person must make an entry in the aircraft record of the 

corrective action taken against discrepancies discovered between 

inspections.

17. The PIC must possess at least a private pilot certificate and at least a 

current third-class medical certificate.

18. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC meets the 

operator’s qualification criteria and demonstrates the ability to safely 

operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be 

operated under the exemption, including evasive and emergency 

maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from persons, vessels, 
vehicles and structures. PIC qualification flight hours must be logged in a 

manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of 

training the operator’s PICs are permitted under the terms of the 

exemption. However, training operations may only be conducted during 

dedicated training sessions. During training, proficiency, and experiencebuilding flights, all persons not essential for flight operations are 

considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA with 

appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 

91.119. 

19. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 

C.F.R. § 1.1. All operations must be conducted under visual 

meteorological conditions (VMC). If flight at night is required, a special 

request will be made at the FAA office closest to proposed area of 

operations. Flights under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not 

authorized. 

20. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference 

point as denoted on a current FAA-published aeronautical chart unless a

letter of agreement with that airport’s management is obtained, and the 

operation is conducted in accordance with a NOTAM as required by the 

operator’s COA. The letter of agreement with the airport management 

must be made available to the Administrator upon request.

21. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 

feet horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute 

miles from the PIC.

22. If the UA loses communications or loses its GPS signal, it must return to 

a pre-determined location within the planned operating area and land or 

be recovered in accordance with the operating documents.

23. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or 

emergencies in accordance with the operating documents. 

24. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind 

and forecast weather conditions) there is enough power to fly at normal 

cruising speed to the intended landing point and land the UA with 25% 

battery power remaining. 

25. The operator must obtain an Air Traffic Organization (ATO) issued 

Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA) prior to conducting any

operations under the grant of exemption. This COA will also require the 

operator to request a Notice to Airman (NOTAM) not more than 72 hours 

in advance, but not less than 48 hours prior to the operation. All 

operations shall be conducted in accordance with airspace requirements 

in the ATO issued COA including class of airspace, altitude level and 

potential transponder requirements. 

26. All aircraft operated in accordance with the exemption must be identified 

by serial number, registered in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 47, and 

have identification (N- Number) markings in accordance with 14 C.F.R. 

part 45, Subpart C. Markings must be as large as practicable. 

27. Before conducting operations, the radio frequency spectrum used for 

operation and control of the UA must comply with the Federal 

Communications Commission (FCC) or other appropriate government 

oversight agency requirements. 
28. The documents required fewer than 14 C.F.R. 91.9 and 91.203 must be 

available to the PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time 

the UAS is operating. These documents must be made available to the 

Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request. 

29. The UA must remain clear and yield the right of way to all manned 

aviation operations and activities at all times. 

30. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or 

vehicle. 

31. Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all 

nonparticipating persons (persons other than the PIC, SO, operator 

trainees or essential persons), vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect 

nonparticipating persons from the UA and/or debris in the 

event of an accident. The operator must ensure that 

nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a 

situation arises where nonparticipating persons leave such 

protection and are within 500 feet of the UA, flight operations 

must cease immediately and/or;

b. The aircraft is operated near vessels, vehicles or structures where 

the owner/controller of such vessels, vehicles or structures has 

granted permission and the PIC has made a safety assessment of 

the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that it 

does not present an undue hazard, and; 

c. Operations nearer to the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential 

persons do not present an undue hazard to those persons per § 

91.119(a).

32. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled-access 

property with permission from the land owner/controller or authorized 

representative. Permission from land owner/controller or authorized 

representative will be obtained for each flight to be conducted.

33. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or 

vertical boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable 

COA must be reported to the FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS-80) 

within 24 hours. Accidents must be reported to the National 

Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions contained on the 

NTSB Website: www.ntsb.gov. 

2. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 61.113(a) And (b) Would 

Not Adversely Affect Safety. 

BILLY R. COOK JR. submits that the equivalent level of safety established by Section 

61.113(a) and (b) will be maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI 

Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UASs unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting 

minimum flight-hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI 

Phantom 3 or DJI Inspire 1 UAS in a manner consistent with the exemption, including evasive 

and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles 

and structures.

Considering BILLY R. COOK JR.’ proposed area of operations, and the operating limitations 

set forth-above; the parallel nature of private pilot aeronautical knowledge requirements to 

those of commercial pilot requirements (See Exemption No. 11062); and the airmanship skills

necessary to safely operate the DJI Phantom 3 or DJI Inspire 1 UAS, BILLY R. COOK JR.
submits that the additional manned airmanship experience of a commercially certificated 

pilot would not correlate to the airmanship skills necessary for BILLY R. COOK JR.’ specific 

proposed flight operations. 

The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) specific to UAS, in 

circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 

11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 

11153, 11156, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161). BILLY R. COOK JR. will not allow any PIC to 

operate the DJI Phantom 3 or DJI Inspire 1 UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting 

minimum flight-hour requirements or the DJI Phantom 3 or DJI Inspire 1 UAS training and 

currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 3 or DJI Inspire 1 

UAS in a manner consistent with this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers 

and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. 

Specifically, the PIC must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. 

§ 61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot (with a minimum of 5 hours of those 

hours as a UAS pilot operating the same make and model of UAS to be used for operations 

under the exemption). In addition to the hour requirements, the PIC must accomplish 3 

takeoffs and landings in the preceding 90 days (for currency purposes). 

As in Exemption Nos. 11062, 11138, and 11153, prior documented flight experience that was 

obtained in compliance with applicable regulations will ensure an equivalent level of safety 

during BILLY R. COOK JR.’ proposed operations. The Administrator has held that prior 

documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations 

would ensure safe operations, stating as follows:

In Exemption No. 11062, the FAA required that prior to conducting operations for the purpose 

of motion picture filming (or similar operations), the PIC must have accumulated and logged, in 

a manner consistent with 14 CFR 61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot 

including at least 10 hours logged as a UAS pilot with a multi-rotor UAS. Prior to operations 

under Exemption No. 11062, the PIC must also have accumulated and logged a minimum of 5 

hours as a UAS pilot operating the same make and model of UAS to be used for operations 

under the exemption. For clarification, the FAA considers these minimum hour requirements to 

be inclusive rather than additive; i.e. 5 hours make and model time may be included in the 10 

hours of multi-rotor time and the 10 hours may be included in the total 25 hours of UAS 

rotorcraft time. In addition to the hour requirements, the PIC must accomplish 3 takeoffs and 

landings in the preceding 90 days (for currency purposes). The FAA finds that at a minimum, 

the flight hour requirements in Exemption No. 11062 are appropriate to practice and build 

proficiency in the skills necessary to safely conduct the petitioner’s proposed operations. The 

FAA also finds that prior documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance with 

applicable regulations would satisfy this requirement. Training, proficiency, and experiencebuilding flights can also be conducted under the grant of exemption to accomplish the required 

flight time. During training, proficiency, and experience-building flights the PIC is required to 

operate the UA with appropriate distances in accordance with 14 C.F.R 91.119. 

Exemption No. 11138 at page 15. 

Accordingly, BILLY R. COOK JR. will ensure safe operations by not allowing any PIC to 

operate the DJI Phantom 3 or DJI Inspire 1 UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting 

minimum flight-hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI 

Phantom 3 or DJI Inspire 1 UAS in a manner consistent with the exemption, including evasive 

and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles 

and structures. 
CONCLUSION

BILLY R. COOK JR. seeks an exemption pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.61 and Section 333 

of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), which will permit safe operation 

of the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UASs commercially, without an airworthiness 

certificate, for the limited purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over 

certain areas of the United States. By granting this Petition, the FAA Administrator will be 

fulfilling the Congressional mandate of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, while 

also advancing the interests of the public, by allowing BILLY R. COOK JR. to safely, 

efficiently, and economically operate the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UASs 

commercially within the NAS. WHEREFORE, in accordance with the Federal Aviation 

Regulations and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Section 333, BILLY R. 

COOK JR. respectfully requests that the Administrator grant this Petition for an exemption from 

the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), and permit BILLY R. COOK JR. to 

operate the DJI Phantom 3, Lily 1, and DJI Inspire 1 UASs commercially for the purpose of 

conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States. 

Dated: October 20, 2015

 Submitted by 

 BILLY R. COOK JR. 

 
APPENDIX – A

DJI PHANTOM 3 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS 

BILLY R. COOK JR. only utilizes safe and reliable UASs. DJI is an industry leader in small UAS 

production. DJI UASs are loaded with ground breaking software enabling the user to set parameters 

which will not allow flight into controlled airspace. Parameters can also be set to limit flight to no 

higher than a predetermined and set altitude as well as limit flight to a predetermined and set distance. 

In addition, DJI software provides real-time altitude and location information to the PIC via the linked 

monitor (smart phone/tablet devices) 

DJI Phantom 3

1.1 Aircraft 

1.1.1 Supported Battery – DJI 6000AH LiPo Battery 

1.1.2 Weight (Battery & Propellers Included) – 2lbs 11.810oz (1242g)

1.1.3 Hover Accuracy (Ready to Fly) – Vertical: .8m; Horizontal: 2.5m 

1.1.4 Max Yaw Angular Velocity - 200/s

1.1.5 Max Tilt Angel - 35 1.1.1.6 Max Ascent Speed – 6m/s

1.1.6 Max Descent Speed – 2m/s

1.1.7 Max Flight Speed – 15m/s (NOT RECOMMENDED) 

1.2 Gimbal 

1.2.1Working Current – Static: 750mA; Dynamic: 900mA 

1.2.2 Control Accuracy - ±0.03 

1.2.3 Controllable Range – Pitch: -90 - 0 

1.2.4 Maximum Angular Speed – Pitch: 90/s 

1.3 Camera 

1.3.1Operating Temperature Range - 32F - 104F (0C - 40C)

1.3.2 Sensor Size – 1/2.3” 

1.3.3 Effective Pixels – 14M

1.3.4 Resolution – 4384x3288 

1.3.5 HD Video Recording – 1080p30 & 720p

1.3.6 Recording Field of View - 110/85 
APPENDIX – B

DJI INSPIRE 1 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS 

BILLY R. COOK JR. only utilizes safe and reliable UASs. DJI is an industry leader in small UAS 

production. DJI UASs are loaded with ground breaking software enabling the user to set parameters 

which will not allow flight into controlled airspace. Parameters can also be set to limit flight to no 

higher than a predetermined and set altitude as well as limit flight to a predetermined and set distance. 

In addition, DJI software provides real-time altitude and location information to the PIC via the linked 

monitor (smart phone/tablet devices) 

DJI Inspire 1

1.1 Aircraft

1.1.1 Model – T600

1.1.2 Weight (Battery Included) – 6lbs 7.5291oz (2935g)

1.1.3 Hovering Accuracy (GPS Mode) – Vertical: 0.5m; Horizontal: 2.5m

1.1.4 Max Angular Velocity – Pitch: 3000 /s; Yaw: 1500 /s

1.1.5 Max Tilt Angle - 350

1.1.6 Max Ascent Speed – 5m/s

1.1.7 Max Descent Speed – 4m/s

1.1.8 Max Speed – 22m/s (ATTI mode, no wind – NOT RECOMMENDED)

1.1.9 Max Flight Altitude – 4500m

1.1.10 Max Wind Resistance – 10m/s

1.1.11 Max Flight Time – Approximately 18 minutes

1.1.12 Motor Model – DJI 3510

1.1.13 Propeller Model – DJI 1345

1.1.14 Operating Temperature Range – 140 F to 1040 F (-100 C to 400 C)

1.1.15 Dimensions – 17 1⁄4” x 17 3⁄4” x 12”

1.2 Gimbal

1.2.1 Model – ZENMUSE X3

1.2.2 Output Power (with camera) – Static: 9W; In Motion: 11W

1.2.3 Operating Current – Static: 750mA; In Motion: 900mA

1.2.4 Angular Vibration Range - ±0.030

1.2.5 Mounting – Detachable

1.2.6 Controllable Range – Pitch: -900 to +300 ; Pan: ±3200

1.2.7 Mechanical Range – Pitch: -1250 to 450 ; Pan: ±3300

1.2.8 Max Controllable Speed – Pitch: 1200 /s; Pan: 1800 /s

1.3 Transmitter
1.3.1 Name – C1

1.3.2 Operating Frequency – 5.728-5.850GHz; 2.400-2.483GHz

1.3.3 Communicating Distance (unobstructed) – 2000m

1.3.4 Output Power – 9W

1.3.5 Operating Temperature Range - 140 F to 1040 F (-100 C to 400 C)

1.3.6 Battery – 600mAh LiPo 2S

All specifications can be found in the attached user manual or at 

http://www.dji.com/product/inspire-1/spec

All technical information on the Lily Robotics camera can be found at:

https://www.lily.camera/tech-specs/