alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of QualMark Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles D.
Johnston, President & Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.

/s/ Charles D. Johnston
-----------------------------------
Charles D. Johnston
President & Chief Executive Officer
May 13, 2005

In connection with the Quarterly Report of QualMark Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony A. Scalese
Chief Financial Officer & Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.

/s/ Anthony A. Scalese
------------------------------------
Anthony A. Scalese
Chief Financial Officer & Principal
Accounting Officer
May 13, 2005

A signed original of these written statements required by section 906 have been
provided to QualMark Corporation and will be retained by QualMark Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

                                       21
<PAGE>

                           Certifications Pursuant to
                            18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southern Investors Service
Company, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Walter M. Mischer, Sr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                             /s/ Walter M. Mischer, Sr.
                             ----------------------------------
                             Name:    Walter M. Mischer, Sr.
                             Title:   Chief Executive Officer
                             Date:    August __, 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southern Investors Service
Company, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Eric Schumann, Senior Vice President - Finance and Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                             /s/ Eric Schumann
                             ----------------------------------
                             Name:    Eric Schumann
                             Title:   Senior Vice President - Finance
                                Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
                             Date:    August __, 2002
#### COM. v. SIMPSON, R.

2737 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/06/2017

CP-39-CR-0000648-2012 (Lehigh)

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             263
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,363
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (400)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,782
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,008
<PP&E>                                         634,240
<DEPRECIATION>                                 326,214
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 327,034
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,279
<BONDS>                                        134,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         18
<COMMON>                                           163
<OTHER-SE>                                     159,798
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   327,034
<SALES>                                         31,274
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,576
<CGS>                                           15,864
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,503
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   104
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,476
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,493
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,299
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,194
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,194
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40


</TABLE>
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 236

To express the sense of the Congress that any Executive order that infringes

on the powers and duties of the Congress under article I, section 8

of the Constitution, or that would require the expenditure of Federal

funds not specifically appropriated for the purpose of the Executive

order, is advisory only unless enacted as law.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 5, 1998

Mr. METCALF (for himself, Mr. HYDE, Mr. BUNNING, Mr. LUCAS of Oklahoma, Mr. NEUMANN, Mr. HILLEARY, Mr. SMITH of Michigan, Mr.

HERGER, Mr. GILMAN, Mr. TRAFICANT, and Mr. CHABOT) submitted the

following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To express the sense of the Congress that any Executive

order that infringes on the powers and duties of the

Congress under article I, section 8 of the Constitution,

or that would require the expenditure of Federal funds

not specifically appropriated for the purpose of the Executive order, is advisory only unless enacted as law.

Whereas some Executive orders have infringed on the prerogatives of the Congress and resulted in the expenditure of

Federal funds not appropriated for the specific purposes

of those Executive orders: Now, therefore, be it
2

•HCON 236 IH

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that any

3 Executive order issued by the President before, on, or

4 after the date of the approval of this resolution that in5 fringes on the powers and duties of the Congress under

6 article I, section 8 of the Constitution, or that would re7 quire the expenditure of Federal funds not specifically ap8 propriated for the purpose of the Executive order, is advi9 sory only unless enacted as law.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                    INTELLIQUEST INFORMATION GROUP, INC.
           STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


                                                            FOR THE THREE MONTHS
                                                                   ENDED
                                                               MARCH 31, 1997
                                                            --------------------

Net income available to common stockholders. . . . . . .           $  583
                                                                   ------
Weighted average shares outstanding:
  Common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .            8,185
  Common stock issued upon exercise of options 
    and warrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .              143

Weighted average common shares and equivalents . . . . .            8,328

Net income per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .           $  .07
                                                                   ------

--------------------
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

No. 85A17

Filed 2 March 2018

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

v.

GLENWOOD EARL DOWNEY

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of 

the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 796 S.E.2d 517 (2017), affirming an order 

denying defendant’s motion to suppress entered on 16 September 2015 by Judge 

Thomas H. Lock, and a judgment entered on 30 September 2015 by Judge Reuben F. 

Young, both in Superior Court, Johnston County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 7 

February 2018.

Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Derrick C. Mertz, Special Deputy

Attorney General, for the State.

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, by Michele A. Goldman, Assistant 

Appellate Defender, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, William W.
Burnham, Chairman of the Board and Acting Chief Financial Officer, of Trudy
Corporation do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:

     1)  The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
         December 31, 2005 being filed with the Securities and Exchange
         Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
         amended; and

     2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

This Certification accompanies this Form 10-QSB as an exhibit, but shall not be
deemed as having been filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or as a separate disclosure document of the Company or the
certifying officer.


                                       /s/ WILLIAM W. BURNHAM
                                       -----------------------------------------
Date: February 14, 2006                William W. Burnham
                                       Chairman of the Board,
                                       Acting Chief Financial Officer

                                       34
Good Neighbor Environmental Board

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Federal Advisory Committee Issues Report on Potential 

Environmental and Economic Benefits of Renewable Energy Development in the U.S.-Mexico 

Border Region

Washington, D.C., On December 14, the Good Neighbor Environmental Board (GNEB, or Board), will 

issue its 14th annual report to the President entitled: The Potential Environmental and Economic Benefits 

of Renewable Energy Development in the U.S.-Mexico Border Region. The Board is an independent 

federal advisory committee that develops recommendations to the President on U.S.-Mexico border 

environment and infrastructure issues. The report will be accepted on behalf of the President by Nancy

Sutley, Chair of the White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), at a public forum held at the 

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.

The report responds to the charge for the Board set by CEQ to provide responsible ways to take advantage 

of the abundant renewable energy resources in the border region while fostering sound economic

development in the area. The report focuses on five sources of renewable energy: solar, wind, biomass, 

geothermal, and hydropower.

Diane Austin, the Board’s Chair, states “To facilitate the careful development of these resources, the 

Board supports an approach that identifies priority areas for potential energy development and emphasizes 

coordination of local, state, tribal, and federal partners. We hope that this report is useful to all U.S. 

government officials as we continue to think about how we can best achieve a healthier environment and 

a better quality of life for all of our citizens.”

The report recommends a number of specific actions the federal government should initiate, including:

 Careful planning and execution of projects and regional initiatives to ensure that any negative 

impacts are identified early and avoided to the greatest extent possible, and that any remaining 

unavoidable impacts are minimized or mitigated;

 Implementing energy efficiency projects and initiatives as a partial or complete alternative prior 

to, and in conjunction with, the development or renewable energy projects;

 Identifying priority areas for potential renewable energy development and emphasize coordination 

of local, state, tribal and federal governments to optimize local benefits while protecting the 

habitats, ecosystems, and the communities of the border region.

The Board is composed of representatives from federal government departments and agencies; state, 

local, and tribal governments in the border region; and community development, academic, health, 

environmental, and other non-governmental organizations. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is 

responsible for managing the Board’s activities.

The 14th Report of the GNEB can be found online at http://www.epa.gov/ocempage/gneb/.

For further information, please contact Mark Joyce, Designated Federal Officer for the Good Neighbor 

Environmental Board at 202-564-2130, or joyce.mark@epa.gov.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                             MATERIAL SUBSIDIARIES

PCC Energy, Inc. (an Alberta, Canada corporation)

PC Energy Corp. (an Alberta, Canada corporation)

BEC Energy Inc.

PetroCorp Acquisition Company
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 53 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.J.Res.53

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                            Joint Resolution

 
                Making corrections to Public Law 104-134.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That:
    (a) In Public Law 104-134, insert after the enacting clause:

                  ``TITLE I--OMNIBUS APPROPRIATIONS''.

    (b) The two penultimate undesignated paragraphs under the 
subheading ``Administrative Provisions, Forest Service'' under the 
heading ``TITLE II--RELATED AGENCIES, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE'' of 
the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 
1996, as contained in section 101(c) of Public Law 104-134, are 
repealed.
    (c) Section 520 under the heading ``TITLE V--GENERAL PROVISIONS'' 
of the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban 
Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1996, as 
contained in section 101(e) of Public Law 104-134, is repealed.
    (d) Strike out section 337 under the heading ``TITLE III--GENERAL 
PROVISIONS'' of the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies 
Appropriations Act, 1996, as contained in section 101(c) of Public Law 
104-134, and insert in lieu thereof:
    ``Sec. 337. The Secretary of the Interior shall promptly convey to 
the Daughters of the American Colonists, without reimbursement, all 
right, title and interest in the plaque that in 1933 was placed on the 
Great Southern Hotel in Saint Louis, Missouri by the Daughters of the 
American Colonists to mark the site of Fort San Carlos.''.
    (e) Section 21104 of Public Law 104-134 is repealed.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<PAGE>
 
                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS
 
  We hereby consent to (i) the use in the Prospectus constituting a part of
the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed by Edge Petroleum Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), under the Securities Act of 1933, of
information contained in our reserve report that is summarized as of September
30, 1996 in our summary letter dated November 27, 1996, relating to the oil and
gas reserves and revenue, as of September 30, 1996 of certain properties that
are sought to be combined in the Company which are currently held by Edge Joint
Venture II and James C. Calaway, which summary letter is attached thereto on
Annex A, and (ii) all references to such report, letter and/or to this firm in
such Prospectus, and further consent to our being named as an expert therein.
 
                                          /s/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
                                              PETROLEUM ENGINEERS 

 
                                          Ryder Scott Company                  
                                          Petroleum Engineers
 
Houston, Texas
December 4, 1996
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6534

ALEXANDER PARKER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus ALTON BASKERVILLE, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-03-263-AM) Submitted: July 16, 2004 Decided: August 4, 2004 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alexander Parker, Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Alexander Parker seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is appealable only if a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude Parker has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Parker’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
H. Con. Res. 263 Agreed to May 13, 1998

One Hundred Fifth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-eight

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL PEACE OFFICERS’ MEMORIAL SERVICE.

The National Fraternal Order of Police and its auxiliary shall

be permitted to sponsor a public event, the seventeenth annual

National Peace Officers’ Memorial Service, on the Capitol Grounds

on May 15, 1998, or on such other date as the Speaker of the

House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate may jointly designate, in order to honor

the more than 160 law enforcement officers who died in the line

of duty during 1997.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

(a) IN GENERAL.—The event authorized to be conducted on

the Capitol Grounds under section 1 shall be free of admission

charge to the public and arranged not to interfere with the needs

of Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect

of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board.

(b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The National Fraternal Order

of Police and its auxiliary shall assume full responsibility for all

expenses and liabilities incident to all activities associated with

the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

(a) STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.—Subject to the approval of

the Architect of the Capitol, the National Fraternal Order of Police

and its auxiliary are authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds

such stage, sound amplification devices, and other related structures

and equipment, as may be required for the event authorized to

be conducted on the Capitol Grounds under section 1.

(b) ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.—The Architect of the Capitol

and the Capitol Police Board are authorized to make any such

additional arrangements as may be required to carry out the event.

SEC. 4. APPLICABILITY OF PROHIBITIONS.

Nothing in this resolution may be construed to waive the

applicability of the prohibitions established by section 4 of the
H. Con. Res. 263—2

Act of July 31, 1946 (40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning

sales, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.