alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          10,050
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             784
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         187,808
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           178,944
<LOANS>                                        493,767
<ALLOWANCE>                                        716
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 710,250
<DEPOSITS>                                     536,038
<SHORT-TERM>                                    64,900
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,623
<LONG-TERM>                                     29,862
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,958
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,865
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 710,250
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 28,391
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               10,196
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    74
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                38,661
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              20,252
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,278
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           14,383
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  9,232
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,551
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,388
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,388
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.23
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.66
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,103
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    999
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   752
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       59
<RECOVERIES>                                        23
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  716
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               374
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            342


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT ITEM 32.1**

 

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

 

The certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

 

May 13, 2011

 

Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of Northern California Bancorp, Inc. certifies:

 

a.               that this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

b.              that information contained in this Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Northern California Bancorp, Inc.

 

 
|   |   | /s/   Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr.  |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|   |   | Charles   T. Chrietzberg, Jr.      |
|   |   | Chief   Executive Officer and President |

 

1

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodrigo Colmenares Y SANCHEZ-SOTO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-50370

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed December 21, 2017

Helen H. Hong, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Michael Emerson Lasater, Esquire, U.S. Attorney, Daniel Earl Zipp, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the US Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Rodrigo Colmenares Y Sanchez-Soto, Pro' Se

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Rodrigo Colmenares Y Sanchez-Soto appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Sanchez-Soto contends that he is entitled to a sentence reduction under Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We review de novo whether a district court had authority to modify a sentence under section 3682(c)(2). *See United States v. Leniear,*574 F.3d 668, 672 (9th Cir. 2009). Given the quantity of drugs involved in Sanchez-Soto’s offense, Amendment 782 did not lower his sentencing range. *See*U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c)(1) (2014). Therefore, a reduction is not authorized under section 3682(c)(2). *See*U.S.S.G. § lB1.10(a)(2)(B) (2014); *United States v. Mercado-Moreno,*869 F.3d 942, 948-49 (9th Cir. 2017).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Gabriel Louis Mendoza, Appellant

No. 06-13-00153-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 283rd District Court of 

Dallas County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. F12-

55612-T). Memorandum Opinion delivered 

by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss

and Justice Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the 

judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment to reflect that 

appellant pled not guilty to the offense of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. As 

modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

We note that the appellant, Gabriel Louis Mendoza, has adequately indicated his inability 

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 23, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
<LEGEND> 
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                                          <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                           JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                      39,147
<SECURITIES>                                                10,490
<RECEIVABLES>                                                2,721
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                    738
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            53,631
<PP&E>                                                       3,636
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              57,936
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        3,189
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                       125
<OTHER-SE>                                                  67,527
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                57,936
<SALES>                                                      5,343
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             5,343
<CGS>                                                        1,236
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                1,236
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (4,317)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    27
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (4,344)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (4,344)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               (0.36)
        


</TABLE>
# C_2018436EN.01004801.xml

| 3.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 436/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 436/48

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2018 — DNV GL v EUIPO (Sustainablel)

(Case T-644/17) (1)

((European Union trade mark - Application for European Union word mark Sustainablel - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2001)))

(2018/C 436/67)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: DNV GL AS (Høvik, Norway) (represented by: J. Albers and N. Köster, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 July 2017 (Case R 2/2017-2), relating to an application for registration of the word mark Sustainablel as a European Union trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders DNV GL AS to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders DNV GL AS to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 374, 6.11.2017.

---
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 292

Designating the second Sunday in October of 1996 as ‘‘National Children’s

Day’’, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 13, 1996

Mr. PRESSLER (for himself and Mr. GRAHAM) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Designating the second Sunday in October of 1996 as

‘‘National Children’s Day’’, and for other purposes.

Whereas the people of the United States should celebrate

children as the most valuable asset of the Nation;

Whereas the children represent the future, hope, and inspiration of the United States;

Whereas the children of the United States should be allowed

to feel that their ideas and dreams will be respected because adults in the United States take time to listen;

Whereas many children of the United States face crises of

grave proportions, especially as they enter adolescent

years;

Whereas it is important for parents to spend time listening

to their children on a daily basis;
2

•SRES 292 IS

Whereas modern societal and economic demands often pull

the family apart;

Whereas encouragement should be given to families to set

aside a special time for all family members to engage together in family activities;

Whereas adults in the United States should have an opportunity to reminisce on their youth to recapture some of

the fresh insight, innocence, and dreams that they may

have lost through the years;

Whereas the designation of a day to commemorate the children of the United States will provide an opportunity to

emphasize to children the importance of developing an

ability to make the choices necessary to distance themselves from impropriety and to contribute to their communities;

Whereas the designation of a day to commemorate the children of the Nation will emphasize to the people of the

United States the importance of the role of the child

within the family and society;

Whereas the people of the United States should emphasize to

children the importance of family life, education, and

spiritual qualities; and

Whereas children are the responsibility of all Americans, thus

everyone should celebrate the children of the United

States, whose questions, laughter, and tears are important to the existence of the United States: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates the second Sun2 day in October of 1996 as ‘‘National Children’s Day’’ and

3 requests that the President issue a proclamation calling
3

•SRES 292 IS

1 on the people of the United States to observe the day with

2 appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED January 20, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40179 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE CRUZ CORTEZ-MELENDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:04-CR-1631-ALL

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jose Cruz Cortez-Melendez appeals his conviction and sentence following his plea of guilty to one count of unlawful re-entry. Melendez first contends that the district court’s 16- level enhancement of his offense level based on his prior drug trafficking conviction violated his constitutional rights in light of United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). As the enhancement was based on a prior conviction, there is no Sixth Amendment error ; rather, any error was in the application of the Sentencing Guidelines as mandatory, which we have termed “ Fanfan ”No. 05-40179 -2-

error. See United States v. Walters , 418 F.3d 464, 463 (5th Cir. 2005) (discussing the distinction between the two types of error addressed in Booker ). When “ Fanfan ” error is preserved in the district court, this court “will ordinarily vacate the sentence and remand, unless we can say the error was harmless.” United
States v. Mares , 402 F.3d 511, 520 n.9 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 43 (2005). As there is no indication in the record that the district court would have imposed the same sentence under an advisory rather than mandatory Guidelines scheme, the Government cannot carry its burden of demonstrating harmless
error, a point that the Government effectively concedes. See United States v. Akpan , 407 F.3d 360, 376-77 (5th Cir. 2005), Cortez next argues that the felony and aggravated felony provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional because they treat prior convictions as sentencing factors rather than offense elements. Cortez’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Cortez contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding.
See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Cortez properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres andNo. 05-40179 -3- circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM Cortez’s conviction, but we VACATE his sentence and REMAND for re-sentencing.
AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART.
| (logo) WELLS       FARGO | Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-010 9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045

 

Tel: 410 884 2000

Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|---------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc.

375 Park Avenue 2nd Floor

J0127-023

New York, NY 10152-023

 

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator for the Crossings at Corona Loan Combination (in such capacities, “Wells Fargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the “reporting period”):

 

 

(a)      A review of Wells Fargo’s activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the “Servicing Agreement(s)”) has been made under my supervision; and

 

(b)     To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted on Schedule B.

 

 

 

March 19, 2015

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

Brian Smith 

Vice President

 

 

 

 

To: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc.

Schedule A

 

 

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

 

 

Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014, by and among RBS Commercial Funding Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as General Master Servicer, CWCapital Asset Management, as General Special Servicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Master Servicer, NCB, FSB, as Co-op Special Servicer, Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Trust Advisor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee to the series WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2014-C23 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, relating to the Crossings at Corona Loan Combination , a pari passu portion of which is included in the Series WFRBS 2014-C24 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates transaction.

 

 

To: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc.

Schedule B

 

 

Material Non-Compliance with Servicing Obligations

 

Not Applicable
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 14259]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05328]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP22-679-000.
    Applicants: Discovery Gas Transmission LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Discovery Gas Transmission LLC 
Housekeeping Tariff Filing to be effective 4/8/2022.
    Filed Date: 3/8/22.
    Accession Number: 20220308-5007.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 3/21/22.
    Any person desiring to protest in any the above proceedings must 
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18 
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified 
comment date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: March 8, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-05328 Filed 3-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to, and solelyfor the purposes of, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), each of the undersigned hereby certifies in thecapacity and on the date indicated below that:

 

1.                                       TheAnnual Report of Rafaella Apparel Group, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for theperiod ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Rafaella Apparel Group, Inc.

 

 
| October 29, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Christa Michalaros                                                                  |
|-----------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  |   | Christa Michalaros  Chief Executive Officer and Director  (Principal Executive Officer) |
|                  |   |                                                                                    |
| October 29, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Chad J. Spooner                                                                     |
|                  |   | Chad J. Spooner  Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)  |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 71 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 71

A resolution designating the chairmen of certain Senate committees for 
                    the One Hundred Fourth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 24 (legislative day, January 10), 1995

Mr. Kempthorne (for Mr. Dole) submitted the following resolution; which 
                      was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
A resolution designating the chairmen of certain Senate committees for 
                    the One Hundred Fourth Congress.

    Resolved, That the following Senators are designated as the chair 
of the following committees for the One Hundred Fourth Congress, or 
until their successors are chosen:
    Committee on the Budget: Mr. Domenici, chairman.
    Committee on Veterans' Affairs: Mr. Simpson, chairman.
    Committee on Indian Affairs: Mr. McCain, chairman.
    Select Committee on Intelligence: Mr. Specter, chairman.
                                 <all>
```