alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 61 (Wednesday, March 30, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 18376]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06739]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Vaccines Against Microbial Diseases.
    Date: April 12, 2022.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Jian Wang, MD, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 4198, MSC 7812, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-
2778, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0473656a636e6d65446777762a6a6d6c2a636b72"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d7a0b6b9b0bdbeb697b4a4a5f9b9bebff9b0b8a1">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Member Conflict: Cancer Prevention and Immunotherapy.
    Date: April 25, 2022.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Laurie Ann Shuman Moss, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 867-5309, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5c303d292e3539722f3429313d3231332f2f1c323534723b332a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="137f7266617a763d607b667e727d7e7c6060537d7a7b3d747c65">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 21, 2022.
Victoria E. Townsend,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-06739 Filed 3-29-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Official Journal C 379/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 379 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5725 October 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 379

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5725 October 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 379/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 379/01

Euro exchange rates

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Amr MOHSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INC.; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-55606

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted January 26, 2018 * San Francisco, California

Filed January 29, 2018

Amr Mohsen, Pro Se

William Francis Sullivan, Attorney, Paul Hastings LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees

Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

AMENDED MEMORANDUM **

Federal prisoner Amr Mohsen appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action alleging Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) and state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Hebbe v. Pliler,*627 F.3d 338, 341 (9th Cir. 2010) (dismissal based on Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)); *Jones v. Blanas,*393 F.3d 918, 926 (9th Cir. 2004) (dismissal based on the applicable statute of limitations). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Mohsen’s RICO claims as time-barred because Mohsen failed to allege facts sufficient to show that his RICO claims were timely. *See Living Designs, Inc. v. E.I. Dupont de Nemours & Co.,*431 F.3d 353, 365 (9th Cir. 2005) (four-year statute of limitations period for civil RICO claims begins to run when a plaintiff knows or should know of the injury that is the basis for the action); *Grimmett v. Brown,*75 F.3d 506, 512-13 (9th Cir. 1996) (discussing “separate accrual rule” in the RICO context).

The district court did not err by taking judicial notice of the complaint Mohsen filed in an earlier action or documents filed in Mohsen’s criminal case. *See Lee v. City of Los Angeles,*250 F.3d 668, 689 (9th Cir. 2001) (setting forth standard of review for district1 court’s decision to take judicial notice; a court may take judicial notice of matters of public record without converting a motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment)

Mohsen’s request for oral argument, set forth in his opening brief, is denied.

Mohsen’s request to reassign this case to a different district court judge, set forth in his reply brief, is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 220 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 220

            In recognition of Ronald Reagan's 85th birthday.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 1, 1996

   Mr. Dole (for himself, Mr. Daschle, and Mr. Warner) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
            In recognition of Ronald Reagan's 85th birthday.

Whereas February 6, 1996, is the 85th birthday of Ronald Wilson Reagan;
Whereas Ronald Reagan was twice elected by overwhelming margins as President of 
        the United States;
Whereas Ronald Reagan is loved and admired by millions of Americans, and by 
        countless others around the world;
Whereas Ronald Reagan, with the leadership of his wife, Nancy, led a national 
        crusade against illegal drugs;
Whereas Ronald Reagan's eloquence united Americans in times of triumph and 
        tragedy;
Whereas the thoughts and prayers of the Senate and the country are with Ronald 
        Reagan in his courageous battle with Alzheimer's disease: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate of the United States extends its birthday 
greetings and best wishes to Ronald Reagan.
    Sec. 2. That the Secretary of the Senate shall transmit a copy of 
this resolution to Ronald Reagan.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Qiang Hao, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Nevstar Corporation (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



1.

The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 15th day of May 2008.



| | /s/ Qiang Hao                            
| | -----------------------------------------
| | Qiang Hao                                
| | Chief Financial
    Officer and Treasurer
| | (Principal Financial
    Officer)        



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Nevstar Corporation and will be retained by Nevstar Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Ashley C. Andersen Zantop,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Trudy Corporation do hereby certify,
to the best of my knowledge that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1) | The Companys Quarterly
 Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 being filed with the
 Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
 requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
 1934, as amended; and
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2) | The information
 contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
 financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                          

This Certification accompanies
this Form 10-Q as an exhibit, but shall not be deemed as having been filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or as a separate
disclosure document of the Company or the certifying officer.

|                      |                                    |                              
|--------------------- | ---------------------------------- | -----------------------------
|Date: January 4, 2010 | By:                                | /s/ Ashley C. Andersen Zantop
|                      |                                    |                              
|                      | Ashley C. Andersen Zantop,        
|                      | President, Chief Executive Officer

---
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Kenneth S. Parks, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this
Form 10-K/A of Mylan N.V.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Kenneth S. Parks         
|Kenneth S. Parks             
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Financial Officer)
|Date: May 1, 2017
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-88,133-01
IN RE EVATRUS DERJUAN M OSS , Relator
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 685173-A IN THE 228 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Relator has f

iled a motion for leave to file an application for a wr it of mandamus pursuant to the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. I n it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in t he 228 District Court of Harris C ounty , that more than 180 day s have elapsed t h since an order desig nating issues was signe d, and that the application has not y et been forwa rded to this Court. Relator contends that the district court enter ed an order desig nating issues on Aug ust 22, 2017. Respondent, the J udg e of the 228 District Court of Har ris County , shall file a response with t h this Court by having the District Clerk submit the rec ord on such habea s corpus application. I n the2

alterna tive, Respondent may resolve the issues set out in the order desig nating issues and then have the District Clerk submit the rec ord on such application. I n either case , Respondent’s answe r shall be submitt ed within 30 day s of the date of this order
. This application for leave to fi l e a wr i t of mandamus will be held in abe y ance until R espondent ha s submitt ed his response
.

Filed: Mar ch 28, 2018 Do not publish
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2011

- 0572 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2011

-NM

- 009

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into a nd then out of the changed cell

. **Estimated Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

c ost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost for

U

. S

. Fleet


### Inspection 1.0 $ 85.00 $0 $ 85.00 1,000 $85,000.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 .00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $85,000 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $
**On**
**- Condition Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- h ours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

( @ $8 5 /hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product



### AFM Revision 1.0 $ 85.00 $0 $ 85.00 

### Bottle Removal 1.0 $ 85.00 $0 $ 85.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO
* Explanation: **DOT Regula tory Policies and Procedures:**  Is the AD significant? YES * NO
* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **I ntrastate Aviation in Alaska:**  This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * NO
* Explanation:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,796
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       843
<INVENTORY>                                        510
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,838
<PP&E>                                             801
<DEPRECIATION>                                      86
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,030
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,809
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        28,469
<OTHER-SE>                                    (43,601)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,030
<SALES>                                          3,058
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,058
<CGS>                                              956
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,142
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (208)<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (537)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (500)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (8)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (492)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (492)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)
<FN>
<F1>Income
</FN>


</TABLE>
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 266

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Department of Defense should

continue to buy goods and services made domestically and not deviate

from the domestic source and manufacturing restrictions on procurements

as established by law.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 29, 1998

Mr. STRICKLAND (for himself and Mr. LOBIONDO) submitted the following

concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on National

Security

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Department of

Defense should continue to buy goods and services made

domestically and not deviate from the domestic source

and manufacturing restrictions on procurements as established by law.

Whereas the Department of Defense is responsible for protecting citizens of the United States and its possessions

from potential dangers from abroad;

Whereas it has always been a fundamental expectation that

the Department of Defense should function to protect,

and, when possible, benefit American communities, citizens, and their livelihoods, and has succeeded in doing so

through its domestic procurement program; and
2

•HCON 266 IH

Whereas the Department of Defense has proposed making exceptions to section 9005 of the National Defense Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (popularly known as

the Berry Amendment), which restricts procurements of

certain articles, items, specialty metals, and tools to domestic sources: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that the De3 partment of Defense should—

4 (1) continue to apply the domestic source re5 strictions established by section 9005 of the Na6 tional Defense Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year

7 1993 (Public Law 102–396; 106 Stat. 1876); and

8 (2) demonstrate greater fiscal responsibility in

9 all other areas before proposing to make any excep10 tions to such section.

Æ
EXHIBIT 31.1


                 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER
                     SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Martin Wade, III, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of International
Microcomputer Software, Inc;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered by this
quarterly report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
periods in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c. Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date.

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.


DATE: FEBRUARY 11, 2003

BY: /S/ MARTIN WADE, III
Martin Wade, III
Director & Chief Executive Officer


                                       31