alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Die K. BLAISE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY (CIA), Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), National Security Agency (NSA), Federal Bureau of Investiga*913tion (FBI), Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), Richard Burr, Chairman, United States Senate Intelligence Committee, Paul D. Ryan, Speaker of the House, United States House of Representatives, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-10419 Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(November 27, 2017)

Die Kouame Blaise, Pro Se

Before WILSON, MARTIN, and JILL . PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Pro se appellant, Die K. Blaise, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his eight-count amended civil rights complaint against five federal agencies, a U.S. Senator, and the Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, In his amended complaint, Blaise alleged that the “intelligence community” improperly used electromagnetic frequency devices to conduct non-consensual experiments on U.S. citizens and to harass, intimidate, and kill individuals who filed complaints. The district court dismissed all of the allegations in his complaint under § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failing to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. In addition to arguing that dismissal of these claims was improper, he raises several -other claims for the first time on appeal.

• Keeping in mind that pro se complaints are liberally construed, we apply the same standard that governs dismissals under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) to § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) dismissals. *Alba v. Montford,*517 F.3d 1249, 1252 (11th Cir. 2008). Arguments raised for the first time on appeal that were not presented in the district court are waived. *Access Now, Inc. v. Southwest Airlines Co.,*385 F.3d 1324, 1331 (11th Cir. 2004). Reviewing the dismissal de novo and taking the allegations in the complaint as true, *see Alba,*517 F.3d at 1252, we affirm the district court.

Section 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) requires the district court to dismiss a case filed by a prisoner if the court determines that the complaint fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted. The district court properly dismissed Blaise’s amended complaint because Blaise failed to demonstrate any cognizable claim for relief as to his original eight claims.

AFFIRMED.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ReadyOne Industries, Inc

. ,

Appellant,

v.

Iveth Rodriguez Lopez

,

Appellee

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

'

' No. 08

- 1 5

- 00 157

- CV

Appeal from the

346 th District Court

o f El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2014

- DCV1252 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellee ’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief until

November 6

, 201 5

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE

APPELLEE ’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Alejandro Acosta, III , the Appellee ’s Attorney,

prepa re the Appellee ’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before November 6 , 201 5

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 16 th day of October , 201 5

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.

( Hughes, J., not partic ipating)
#### Jody Jose MARQUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES, Health Care Contractor; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-15601

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted January 16, 2018 *

Filed January 19, 2018

Jody Jose Marquez, Pro Se

Joseph Scott Conlon, Richard Harris Goldberg, Renaud Cook Drury Mesaros, PA, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendants-Appel-lees

Before: REINHARDT, TROTT, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Arizona state prisoner Jody Jose Marquez appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs, We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, We review de novo. *Toguchi v. Chung,*391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Marquez failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as *302to whether any defendant was deliberately indifferent in treating Marquez’s back problems. *See id.*at 1057-60 (a prison official acts with deliberate indifference only if he or she knows of and disregards an excessive risk to the prisoner’s health; negligence, medical malpractice, or a difference in opinion are insufficient to establish deliberate indifference).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Marquez’s second motion to produce documents because Marquez failed to show that he was actually and substantially prejudiced. *See Laub v. U.S. Dep’t of Interior,*342 F.3d 1080, 1084, 1093 (9th Cir. 2003) (setting forth standard of review and noting that a district court’s “decision to deny discovery will not be disturbed except upon the clearest showing that the denial of discovery results in actual and substantial prejudice to the complaining litigant”).

Marquez forfeited his opportunity to appeal the denial of his motion to appoint counsel, motion to compel, and “motion for extension of uniform interrogatory question limit” because Marquez did not file any objections to the magistrate judge’s orders on these motions. *See Bastidas v. Chappell,*791 F.3d 1155, 1159 (9th Cir. 2015) (“[A] party who fails to file timely objections to a magistrate judge’s *nondis-positive*order with the district judge to whom the case is assigned forfeits its right to appellate review of that order.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

Defendants’ motion to strike (Docket Entry No. 23) is granted in part and denied in part. We grant' defendants’ request to strike Marquez’s exhibit nos. 19, 26, 28, 29, and 30 from Docket Entry No. 22. We deny the remainder of defendants’ motion to strike.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 18

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Congratulating the people of the Republic of Nicaheld on October 20, 1996. ragua on the success of their democratic elections
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 18

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas on October 20, 1996, the people of the Republic of

Nicaragua held truly democratic, multiparty elections to

choose their government;

Whereas these elections were deemed by international and domestic observers to be free and fair and a legitimate expression of the will of the people of the Republic of Nicaragua;
2

•HCON 18 EH

Whereas on January 10, 1997, Arnoldo Aleman was peacefully sworn in to the office of President of the Republic

of Nicaragua and immediately promised to continue down

the path to democracy, national reconciliation and reconstruction that was started by the previous administration

of President Violeta Barrios de Chamorro; and

Whereas this historic event of democratic elections in the Republic of Nicaragua and the inauguration of President

Arnoldo Aleman should be honored: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) congratulates the people of the Republic of

4 Nicaragua for the successful completion of the his5 toric democratic, multiparty elections held on Octo6 ber 20, 1996;

7 (2) congratulates former President Violeta

8 Barrios de Chamorro for her personal courage and

9 her commitment to democracy, which have helped

10 her achieve a profound political and economic transi11 tion in the Republic of Nicaragua;

12 (3) encourages all Nicaraguans to continue to

13 work together after taking this critical step on the

14 long road to lasting peace and democracy;

15 (4) recognizes that all Nicaraguans should con16 tinue to work together in order to ensure a stable

17 democracy, respect for human rights, a free and
3

•HCON 18 EH

1 market-oriented economy, and social justice for all

2 people;

3 (5) reaffirms the commitment of the United

4 States to help the Republic of Nicaragua move to5 ward freedom and democracy; and

6 (6) further reaffirms that the United States is

7 strongly committed to encouraging democracy and

8 peaceful development throughout the Western Hemi9 sphere.

Passed the House of Representatives March 5,

1997.

Attest:

Clerk.
No. 11-864.

#### Comcast Corp. et al. *v.*Behrend et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. [Certiorari granted, 567 U. S. 933.] Motion of petitioners to file volumes four and five of the joint appendix under seal granted.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DE CEMBER 31, 2015

NO. 03

- 15

- 00331

- CV

A. S., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Public Safety, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 331ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND BOURLAN D

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the district court on April 28, 2015. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the district court’s judgment . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the district court’s judgment

.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Teekay Offshore
Partners L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 20-F), I, Peter Evensen,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                                                    
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|Dated: April 23, 2012 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Peter Evensen                                  
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Peter Evensen                                      
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
| <PAGE> 43 | Form 10-Q |
|-------------------|-----------|

**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Patricia F. Russo, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Lucent Technologies Inc. (the “Company”), and Frank A. D’Amelio, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

|  | (1)
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: August 5, 2004

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Patricia F. Russo

 

 

 

 

 

Patricia F. RussoChairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Frank A. D’Amelio

 

 

 

 

 

Frank A. D’AmelioExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

  |
|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (logo)  WELLS FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October1, 2014, by and among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.,as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNRPartners, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCertificate Administrator, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee,and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor with respect toCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C24 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice Presidentof Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.      Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.      To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018.

 

 

/s/Daniel Bober

DanielBober

ExecutiveVice President

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
(logo) BERKADIA

 

 

Annual Statement as to Compliance

For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”)

 

Deutsche Mortgage & Asset receiving Corporation 

Series 2014-UBS6

 

Pursuant to Section 3.06 (f) of the Amended and Restated Subservicing Agreement governing the referenced transaction (the “Servicing Agreement”), I hereby attest that:

 

i. A review of the activities and performance of Berkadia as Subservicer during the Reporting Period has been made under my supervision.

 

ii. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Berkadia as Subservicer has fulfilled, in all material respects, its obligations under this Amended and Restated Subservicing Agreement throughout the Reporting Period and no default by the Subservicer under the Subservicing Agreement has occurred and is continuing.

 

Berkadia,

 

/s/ Mark E. McCool

Mark E. McCool

President

February 10, 2016
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, David R. Wells, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Powerhouse
Technologies Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: February 9, 2005

BY: _______________
David R. Wells
Vice President, Finance Operations
(Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 57 (Thursday, March 24, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 16724]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06240]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


 Notice of Effectiveness of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status

 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     Docket No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
El Sauz Ranch Wind, LLC..................  EG22-27-000
Northern Wind Energy Redevelopment, LLC..  EG22-28-000
Red Barn Energy, LLC.....................  EG22-29-000
Rock Aetna Power Partners, LLC...........  EG22-30-000
Arrow Canyon Solar, LLC..................  EG22-31-000
Flower Valley II LLC.....................  EG22-32-000
Mesa Wind Power LLC......................  EG22-33-000
AM Wind Repower LLC......................  EG22-34-000
Mulligan Solar, LLC......................  EG22-35-000
Lancaster Area Battery Storage, LLC......  EG22-36-000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Take notice that during the month of February 2022, the status of 
the above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators became 
effective by operation of the Commission's regulations. 18 CFR 366.7(a) 
(2021).

    Dated: March 18, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-06240 Filed 3-23-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-16-2000
<CASH>                                           1,544
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,404
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      8,834
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,042
<PP&E>                                         124,939
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 356,043
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          202,551
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           341
<OTHER-SE>                                     105,303
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   356,043
<SALES>                                        118,323
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               118,323
<CGS>                                           38,893
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  105,816
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (3,935)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,027)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        30
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,331)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)


</TABLE>