alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ames, Angelia (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Bill Evans [bill@mietuslaw.com] 

Monday, April 11, 2011 2:27 PM 

Ames, Angelia (OST) 

Subject: FW: Aerovias de Mexico Exemption Application--POLLING 

Here's the exchange of e-mails I had with Bob Finamore indicating there were no objections 

to the application. 

From: Bill Eva ns 

Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 12: 15 PM 

To: 'Robert.Finamore@dot.gov' 

Subject: RE: Aerovias de Mexico Exemption Application--POLLING 

Thank you very much. 

From: Robert.Fi namore@dot.gov [mailto: Robert. Finamore@dot.govl 

Sent: Thursday, April 07, 201112:13 PM 

To: Bill Evans 

Subject: RE: Aerovias de Mexico Exemption Application--POLLING 

Thanks, approval is attached .... 

From: Bill Evans [mailto:bill@mietuslaw.coml 

Sent: Thursday, April 07,2011 9:18 AM 

To: Finamore, Robert (OST) 

Subject: RE: Aerovias de Mexico Exemption Application--POLLING 

Bob: 

Polling is complete. No objections. 

Bill 

Connected by DROID on Verizon Wireless 

-----Original message-----

From: "Robert. Finamore@dot.gov" <Robert. Finamore@dot.gov> 

To: Bill Evans <bill@mietuslaw.com> 

Sent: Thu, Apr 7,2011 12:34:17 GMT +00:00 

Subject: RE: Aerovias de Mexico Exemption Application--POLLING 

Hi Bill, 

This application was docketed in 2011-0075, rather than 2011-0074 as we told you yesterday. Please let me know when 

polling is completed. 

Thanks, 

Bob 

From: Bill Evans [mailto:bill@mietuslaw.coml 

Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 12:22 PM 

1 
To: Aaron Goerlich; Alexander Van der Bellen; Benjamin Slocum; Bruce Keiner; Carl Nelson; Dan Weiss; Danielle Fisher; 

David Kirstein; David L. Vaughan; Edward P. Faberman; Frank Avent; Howard Kass; Jeff Morgan; Jeffrey A. Manley; 

Joanne W. Young; John Allen; John Richardson; Kris Urs; Marshall Sinick; Nancy S. Sparks; Pierre Murphy; Robert Wirick 

; Steve Lachter 

Cc: Finamore, Robert (OST) 

Subject: Aerovias de Mexico Exemption Application--POLUNG 

Attached is the application of Aeromexico for Mexico City-Fresno exemption authority. 

PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF YOUR CLIENTS HAVE ANY OBJECTIONS. THANKS. 

William C. Evans* 

Law Office of John Mietus, LLC 

670 I Democracy Boulevard #300 

Bethesda, MD 20817-7500 

(202) 747-5212 Office 

(410) 827-5074 Home Office 

(240) 396-5362 Fax 

*Admitted in the District of Columbia 

Practice limited to Federal transportation matters 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information in this e-mail and any attachments may be privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you 

are not the intended recipient, please do not review, use, disclose, distribute or copy the information it contains; destroy this e-mail and notify the sender by reply 

e-mail orane-mailtoadmin@mietuslaw.com. Thanks. 

2
February 9, 2010

Ms. Lisa Jackson

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Ben Franklin Post Office

P.O. Box 862

Washington, DC 20044

Attn: Chemical Right-to-Know Program

Subject: Submission of documents for 2,3-pyridinedicarboxylic acid (CAS No. 89-00-9) under 

the EHPV Challenge Program, via electronic submission to EHPV-ProgramSubmissions@epa.gov

Exponent Project No. 1006827.000

Dear Administrator Jackson:

On behalf of BASF Corporation, we are submitting the attached revised test plan and revised 

robust summaries for 2,3-pyridinedicarboxylic acid (CAS No. 89-00-9). 

The submission, made under the U.S. EPA’s Extended High Production Volume Chemical 

Challenge Program, consists of a revised test plan and revised robust summaries for 2,3-

pyridinedicarboxylic acid and an analog, 2,3-pyridinedicarboxylic acid, 5-ethyl (CAS No. 

102268-15-5). Use and exposure information is contained in the test plan as well as the robust 

summaries. This revision updates our original submission of February 13, 2009. 

The documents are being submitted in electronic format (Adobe Acrobat pdf files). In addition, 

we have completed entry of the robust summaries into HPVIS.

If you have difficulty with the electronic submission or require additional information, please 

contact me, as BASF’s representative, by phone (919-228-6480) or e-mail 

(jstaveley@exponent.com). 

1006827.000
Ms. Lisa Jackson

February 9, 2011

1006827.000

Sincerely,

Jane P. Staveley, M.S.P.H.

Senior Managing Scientist

Enclosures (2):

 Revised test plan for 2,3-pyridinedicarboxylic acid (pdf)

 Robust summaries for 2,3-pyridinedicarboxylic acid and 2,3-pyridinedicarboxylic acid,

5-ethyl

cc: Dr. Ralph Parod, BASF Corporation

Dr. David Cortes, BASF Corporation

Ms. Christina Franz, American Chemistry Council
Docket Number FAA-2014-0582

 9. Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

JOHN L. TWYMAN, : No. 36 MM 2024 

Petitioner 

V. 

FAIR OAKS, 

Respondent 

ORDER

Emergency Petition for Immediate 

Relief and Application for Leave to 

File Original Process 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 9t" day of April, 2024, the " Emergency Petition for Immediate 

Relief, Stay of Proceedings in the Magistrate Court, and Supersedeas During the 

Pendency of Petitioner's Appeal to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania" and "Application 

for Leave to File Original Process" are DENIED.
EXHIBIT
32.1


and


EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of
Deerfield Resources, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, James W. Morgon, Chief Executive and Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ James W.
MorgonName:  James
      W. MorgonTitle:
         Chief Executive and Financial OfficerDate:
         December 27,
2008




A signed
original of this written statement, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to
Deerfield Resources, Ltd., and will be retained by Deerfield Resources, Ltd.,
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Javier FUENTES-SEQUERA, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40379 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 20, 2017

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S, Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Javier Fuentes-Sequera, Pro Se

Before JONES, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. •

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Javier Fuentes-Sequera has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Fuentes-Sequera has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 305 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 305

 To designate Saturday, November 30, 1996, as ``National Duck Calling 
                                 Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 28, 1996

Mr. Pryor (for himself, Mr. Bumpers, Mr. Johnston, Mr. Breaux, and Mr. 
  Ford) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To designate Saturday, November 30, 1996, as ``National Duck Calling 
                                 Day''.

Whereas Stuttgart, Arkansas, with its flooded rice and soybean fields, is 
        located in the heart of the Mississippi River flyway for migratory 
        birds;
Whereas for the past 60 years, the World's Championship Duck Calling Contest and 
        the Wings Over the Prairie Festival have attracted waterfowl enthusiasts 
        from around the world to come to Stuttgart, Arkansas, on Thanksgiving 
        Day weekend;
Whereas the first national duck calling contest was held on November 24, 1936, 
        as part of the traditional Rice Carnival in downtown Stuttgart;
Whereas Thomas E. Walsh of Greenville, Mississippi, was the first national duck 
        calling contest champion, and was awarded a hunting coat valued at $6.60 
        for his achievement;
Whereas today, the World's Championship Duck Calling Contest draws contestants 
        from throughout the United States and Canada, with a first place prize 
        package valued at over $15,000;
Whereas in order to enter the World's Championship Duck Calling Contest a 
        contestant must qualify by winning a World's Championship Duck Calling 
        Contest sanctioned calling contest, which are held in 29 states; and
Whereas over the history of the World's Championship Duck Calling Contest 
        attendance at the event has steadily grown; the number of participants 
        has jumped from 10,000 in 1954, to 50,000 in 1992, to 65,000 in 1995: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate designates Saturday, November 30, 1996, 
as ``National Duck Calling Day''. The President is authorized and 
requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United 
States to observe such day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage Servicing**D1086-120, 12th Floor550 South Tyron StreetCharlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2014, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C24 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A |  (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 758 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 758

  To amend Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to improve 
            attorney accountability, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2015

Mr. Smith of Texas (for himself, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. Franks of Arizona, 
 Mr. Farenthold, and Mr. Chabot) introduced the following bill; which 
             was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to improve 
            attorney accountability, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. ATTORNEY ACCOUNTABILITY.

    (a) Sanctions Under Rule 11.--Rule 11(c) of the Federal Rules of 
Civil Procedure is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``may'' and inserting 
        ``shall'';
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``Rule 5'' and all that 
        follows through ``motion.'' and inserting ``Rule 5.''; and
            (3) in paragraph (4), by striking ``situated'' and all that 
        follows through the end of the paragraph and inserting 
        ``situated, and to compensate the parties that were injured by 
        such conduct. Subject to the limitations in paragraph (5), the 
        sanction shall consist of an order to pay to the party or 
        parties the amount of the reasonable expenses incurred as a 
        direct result of the violation, including reasonable attorneys' 
        fees and costs. The court may also impose additional 
        appropriate sanctions, such as striking the pleadings, 
        dismissing the suit, or other directives of a non-monetary 
        nature, or, if warranted for effective deterrence, an order 
        directing payment of a penalty into the court.''.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this Act or an amendment made 
by this Act shall be construed to bar or impede the assertion or 
development of new claims, defenses, or remedies under Federal, State, 
or local laws, including civil rights laws, or under the Constitution 
of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
October 27, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MECHANICAL SYSTEMS LIMITED AND CHIEF TONY UKASANYA, 

Appellants

NO. 14-14-00684-CV V.

JOLACO MARITIME SERVICES, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on August 14, 2014. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Mechanical Systems Limited and Chief Tony Ukasanya.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of IWO Holdings Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 (the "Report"), I, Jerry E.
Vaughn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Robert W. Piper
------------------------
Robert W. Piper
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 25, 2003
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1874

BETTY T. GORDON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DUPONT PENSION AND RETIREMENT PLAN; E. I.

DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Danville. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-95-846-7-RD)

Submitted: November 30, 1998 Decided: January 21, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Betty T. Gordon, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia Kyle Epps, Hill B.

Wellford, Jr., Wood Walter Lay, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, Richmond,

Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Betty T. Gordon appeals the district court’s order denying

relief in her action under the Employee Retirement Income Security

Act. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. See Gordon v. DuPont Pension, No.

CA-95-846-7-RD (W.D. Va. May 13, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS OF BIOFIELD CORPORATION FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       5,122,640
<SECURITIES>                                 1,499,854
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,255,834
<PP&E>                                         519,609<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,445,125
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,485,690
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,518
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,952,917
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,445,125
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,942,188
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,226
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (7,519,761)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (7,519,761)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (7,519,761)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.16)
<FN>
<F1>PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT IS REPORTED NET OF ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION OF
$1,278,913.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 294

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 30, 1998

Received and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Commending the Armed Forces for their efforts, leadership,

and success in providing equality of treatment and opportunity for their military and civilian personnel without

regard to race, color, religion, or national origin.

Whereas on July 26, 1948, President Truman issued Executive Order 9981 ordering the integration of the Armed

Forces;

Whereas the President stated 50 years ago in the executive

order that it was ‘‘essential that there be maintained in

the armed services of the United States the highest

standards of democracy, with equality of treatment and

opportunity for all those who serve in our country’s defense’’;

Whereas in the executive order the President declared that

‘‘there shall be equality of treatment and opportunity for

all persons in the armed services without regard to race,

color, religion or national origin’’;
2

HCON 294 RFS

Whereas, soon after the President issued the executive order,

United States forces in Korea were integrated, leading

the way to a fully integrated army;

Whereas the Armed Forces have used the implementation

and enforcement of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as additional tools to eliminate discrimination among their military and civilian personnel;

Whereas in 1998 minorities serve in senior leadership positions throughout the Armed Forces, as officers, as senior

non-commissioned officers, and as civilian leaders;

Whereas the Armed Forces have demonstrated a continuing

commitment to ensuring the equality of treatment and

opportunity for all military and civilian personnel of the

Armed Forces; and

Whereas the efforts of the Armed Forces to ensure the equality of treatment and opportunity for their personnel have

contributed significantly to the advancement of equality

of treatment and opportunity for all Americans: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress commends the Armed

3 Forces for their efforts, leadership, and success in provid4 ing equality of treatment and opportunity for their mili5 tary and civilian personnel without regard to race, color,

6 religion, or national origin.

Passed the House of Representatives July 29, 1998.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
**EXHIBIT ITEM 32.2**

 

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

 

Thecertification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and ExchangeCommission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63of Title 18 of the United States Code.

 

August11, 2005

 

 

BruceN. Warner, the Chief Financial Officer of Northern California Bancorp, Inc.certifies:

 

a.               thatthis periodic report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

b.              thatinformation contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of NorthernCalifornia Bancorp, Inc.

 
|   | /s/ Bruce N. Warner            |   |
|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
|   | Bruce N. Warner                |
|   | *Chief Financial Officer and*  |
|   | *Principal Accounting Officer* |

 

1

----