alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-35 (f)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax


Wells Fargo Bank. N.A.


March 13, 2007


Renaissance Mortgage Acceptance Corp.


RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for Renaissance Home Equity Loan Trust
2006-4


Per Section 3.09 of the Servicing Agreement, dated as of 12/28/2006, the
undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Master Servicer), hereby
certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:


(i)     a review of the activities of such party during the preceding calendar
        year or portion thereof and of such party's performance under this
        Agreement or such other applicable agreement in the case of a Servicing
        Function Participant has been made under such officers' supervision and


(ii)    to the best of such officers' knowledge, based on such review, such
        party has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement or such
        other applicable agreement in the case of a Servicing Function
        Participant in all material respects throughout such calendar year, or,
        if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any
        material respect, specifying each such failure known to such officer and
        the nature and status of cure provisions thereof.



Certified By:
/s/Reid Denny
Reid Denny, Vice President


Certified By:
/s/Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 9, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13301-13302]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04943]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the

[[Page 13302]]

provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; Review of Neurosurgeon K12 
Applications.
    Date: April 5, 2022.
    Time: 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: William C. Benzing, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NINDS, NIH, NSC, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Suite 3204, 
MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-496-0660, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e280878c988b8c8595a28f838b8ecc8c8b8acc858d94"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="583a3d362231363f2f183539313476363130763f372e">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 3, 2022.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-04943 Filed 3-8-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>



                                                                      Form 10-Q

                                  Exhibit 31.1

                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Patricia F. Russo, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Lucent
Technologies Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Lucent Technologies
Inc. (the "registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: February 10, 2004


/s/ Patricia F. Russo
----------------------------------------
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of QualMark Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles
D. Johnston, President & Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.

/s/ Charles D. Johnston
-----------------------------------
Charles D. Johnston
President & Chief Executive Officer
November 13, 2003

In connection with the Quarterly Report of QualMark Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony
A. Scalese Chief Financial Officer & Principal Accounting Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.

/s/ Anthony A. Scalese
------------------------------------------------------
Anthony A. Scalese
Chief Financial Officer & Principal Accounting Officer
November 13, 2003

A signed original of these written statements required by section 906 have been
provided to QualMark Corporation and will be retained by QualMark Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
1

From: Rochelle Boyd [Boyd.Rochelle@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 12:12 PM

To: Aaron Hill

Cc: Bahner, Mark A.; Green, David A.

Subject: RE: United Iron & Metal Inc

That will be fine. Can you send me the physical and mailing address of the facility, phone number, and contact name? I 

will send the safety form that I need completed once I have that information. Is this facility subject to Subpart RRR? If not, 

is the eddy separator the only piece of equipment handling mixed aluminum scrap? Is there a hotel nearby that you 

recommend so that I can check in on Sunday. I would like to arrive at 8:30 am on Monday. It will just be Mark Bahner 

and myself. 

I will complete the safety form and send it once 

Rochelle Boyd, Environmental Engineer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Sector Policies and Programs Division

109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711

Mail Drop D243-02

Ph: (919) 541-1390 Fax: (919) 541-3207

Email: boyd.rochelle@epa.gov 

From: Aaron Hill <ahill@arg-scrap.com> 

To: Rochelle Boyd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: "Bahner, Mark A." <bahner@rti.org>, "green@rti.org" <green@rti.org> 

Date: 07/26/2011 10:16 AM 

Subject: RE: United Iron & Metal Inc 

Rochelle

I am out of town that day. What about the 15th on your way back from Philly?

Aaron

-----Original Message-----

From: Rochelle Boyd [mailto:Boyd.Rochelle@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 6:06 PM

To: Aaron Hill

Cc: Bahner, Mark A.; green@rti.org

Subject: RE: United Iron & Metal Inc

We have a deadline that week anyway. What about Friday the 12th, since

I have to be in Philadelphia on the 13th?

Rochelle Boyd, Environmental Engineer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Sector Policies and Programs Division

109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711

Mail Drop D243-02

Ph: (919) 541-1390 Fax: (919) 541-3207

Email: boyd.rochelle@epa.gov
2

From: Aaron Hill <ahill@arg-scrap.com>

To: Rochelle Boyd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "green@rti.org" <green@rti.org>, "Bahner, Mark A."

<bahner@rti.org>

Date: 07/25/2011 10:54 AM

Subject: RE: United Iron & Metal Inc

Rochelle

I need to be in New York on the 4th for a meeting - can we do the

walkthrough at United on Friday the 5th?

Aaron

From: Rochelle Boyd [mailto:Boyd.Rochelle@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 11:10 AM

To: Aaron Hill

Cc: green@rti.org; Bahner, Mark A.

Subject: United Iron & Metal Inc

Hi Aaron, I have a class next Wednesday and Thursday and was wondering

if I could come up to visit the Eddy Separator on August 3rd or 4th.

Please let me know. Thanks

Rochelle Boyd, Environmental Engineer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Sector Policies and Programs Division

109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711

Mail Drop D243-02

Ph: (919) 541-1390 Fax: (919) 541-3207

Email: boyd.rochelle@epa.gov
* The case is unanimously ordered submitted without oral argument pursuant to the

applicable rules. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfa vors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 4/22/96 TENTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CRAIG R. FRANKE, Defendant - Appellant. No. 95-3355 (D.C. Nos. 92-20029-01 / 92-20069-01)

(D. Kan.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before SEYMOUR , McKAY and LUCERO , Circuit Judges. In this case, a federal prisoner appeals the district court’s order revoking supervised release and ordering a period of incarceration. Craig R. Franke was convicted in 1994 of mail fraud in connection with his business of collecting unclaimed funds, and failing to appear at his first trial date for the mail fraud charges. He was sentenced to a period of incarceration and term of supervised release. His supervised release was revoked for violations of its terms, specifically, for travelling outside of the District of Kansas without authorization from the United States Probation Office, and failing to- 2 -

provide certain financial information to that office. Franke does not dispute the truth of the allegations, but appeals the district court’s order -- revoking supervised release and sentencing him to nine months in prison -- on jurisdictional grounds. We review the revocation of supervised release for abuse of discretion. United States v. Reber , 876 F.2d 81, 83 (10th Cir. 1989). In order to revoke supervised release, “[t]he district court must find by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant violated a condition of his supervised release.” United States v. Hall , 984 F.2d 387, 390 (10th Cir.), cert. denied , 113 S. Ct. 2942 (1993). Franke argues that, when he crossed the Missouri state line from Kansas, the district court lost jurisdiction over him, and was without power to restrict his travel in that district. This argument reflects a misunderstanding of the district court’s order, which was that Franke remain in the District of Kansas. The only question before the district court was whether the preponderance of the evidence proved that Franke had left the District of Kansas without permission. See id

. Franke admitted in his “Motion to Dismiss Alleged Supervised Release Violations” that he “resides in the State of Missouri, [therefore,] travel within the state is expected.” It is undisputed that Franke did not have permission to enter that state. The district court did not err in finding that Franke had violated a term of his supervised release by travelling in Missouri. Franke’s remaining arguments seem to challenge an earlier district court order- 3 -

denying his motion to modify the terms of his supervised release. That order is not before this Court in this appeal, and we do not consider the arguments made against it. AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Carlos F. Lucero Circuit Judge
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Powerhouse  Technologies  Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, David R. Wells, Vice President Finance  Operations  (Principal  Financial and
Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ David R. Wells
------------------------------
David R. Wells
Vice President Finance Operations
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Date:  December 22, 2004


                                      -12-
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

 

Thecertification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and ExchangeCommission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63of Title 18 of the United States Code.

 

November10, 2004

 

BruceN. Warner, the Chief Financial Officer of Northern California Bancorp, Inc.certifies:

 

d.              that thisperiodic report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

e.               thatinformation contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of NorthernCalifornia Bancorp, Inc..

 

 
|   | /s/ Bruce N. Warner          |   |
|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|   | Bruce  N. Warner             |
|   | Chief Financial Officer  and |
|   | Principal Accounting Officer |

 

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gina Renee LOPEZ-ORFIELD, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-7591

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 15, 2018

Decided: February 20, 2018

Gina Renee Lopez-Orfield, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Brian K. Patton, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.

Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gina Renee Lopez-Orfield seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lopez-Orfield has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeala-bility and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 265 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 265

   Authorizing the use of the East Front of the Capitol Grounds for 
performances sponsored by the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing 
                                 Arts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 1998

  Mr. Shuster (for himself and Mr. Oberstar) submitted the following 
     concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Authorizing the use of the East Front of the Capitol Grounds for 
performances sponsored by the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing 
                                 Arts.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZING USE OF EAST FRONT FOR PERFORMANCES SPONSORED BY 
              KENNEDY CENTER.

    In carrying out its duties under section 4 of the John F. Kennedy 
Center Act (20 U.S.C. 76j), the John F. Kennedy Center for the 
Performing Arts in cooperation with the National Park Service (in this 
resolution jointly referred to as the ``sponsor'') may sponsor public 
performances on the East Front of the Capitol Grounds at such dates and 
times as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and Committee on 
Rules and Administration of the Senate may approve jointly.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Any performance authorized under section 1 shall 
be free of admission charge to the public and arranged not to interfere 
with the needs of Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by the 
Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board.
    (b) Assumption of Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all liabilities incident to all activities 
associated with the performance.

SEC. 3. PREPARATIONS.

    (a) Structures and Equipment.--In consultation with the Speaker of 
the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and 
Administration of the Senate, the Architect of the Capitol shall 
provide upon the Capitol grounds such stage, sound amplification 
devices, and other related structures and equipment as may be required 
for a performance authorized under section 1.
    (b) Additional Arrangements.--The Architect of the Capitol and the 
Capitol Police Board may make such additional arrangements as may be 
required to carry out the performance.

SEC. 4. APPLICABILITY OF PROHIBITIONS.

    Nothing in this resolution may be construed to waive the 
applicability of the prohibitions established by section 4 of the Act 
of July 31, 1946 (40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, 
displays and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds.

SEC. 5. EXPIRATION OF AUTHORITY.

    A performance may not be conducted under this resolution after 
September 30, 1998.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David A. Baldwin,  President of CE Casecnan  Water and Energy  Company,  Inc.
(the "Company"),  certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the  Company  for the  quarterly
         period  ended June 30,  2003 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
         requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2) the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


Dated:  August 5, 2003



                              /s/ David A. Baldwin
                              --------------------
                                David A. Baldwin
                                    President
                            (chief executive officer)
No. 11-1214.

#### St. Angelo *v.*Indiana.

Ct. App. Ind. Certio-rari denied.