alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 171 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con. Res.171
                                          Agreed to May 21, 1998        

                       One Hundred Fifth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  eight

                          Concurrent Resolution

 

Whereas in 1928 Julian Stanley Wise founded the first volunteer rescue 
  squad in the United States, the Roanoke Life Saving and First Aid 
  Crew, and Virginia has subsequently taken the lead in honoring the 
  thousands of people nationwide who give their time and energy to 
  community rescue squads through the establishment of To The Rescue, a 
  museum located in Roanoke devoted to emergency medical services (EMS) 
  personnel;

Whereas to further recognize the selfless contributions of EMS 
  personnel nationwide, the Virginia Association of Volunteer Rescue 
  Squads, Inc., and the Julian Stanley Wise Foundation, in conjunction 
  with To The Rescue, in 1993 organized the first annual National 
  Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Memorial Service at Greene Memorial 
  United Methodist Church in Roanoke, Virginia, to honor EMS personnel 
  from across the country who have died in the line of duty;

Whereas the annual National EMS Memorial Service has captured national 
  attention by honoring 119 providers of emergency medical services 
  from 35 States;

Whereas the singular devotion of EMS personnel to the safety and 
  welfare of their fellow citizens is worthy of the highest praise;

Whereas the annual National EMS Memorial Service is a fitting reminder 
  of the bravery and sacrifice of EMS personnel nationwide;

Whereas according to the Department of Health and Human Services, 
  170,000 Americans require emergency medical services on an average 
  day, a number which projects to over 60,000,000 people annually; and

Whereas the life of every American will be affected, directly or 
  indirectly, by the uniquely skilled and dedicated efforts of EMS 
  personnel who work bravely and tirelessly to preserve America's 
  greatest resource--people: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. OFFICIAL SITE OF NATIONAL MEMORIAL SERVICE.

    The Congress declares the City of Roanoke, Virginia, to be the 
official site of the National Emergency Medical Services Memorial 
Service to honor emergency medical services personnel who have died in 
the line of duty.

SEC. 2. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

    Nothing in this resolution shall be construed to place the National 
Emergency Medical Services Memorial Service under Federal authority or 
to require any expenditure of Federal funds.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
No. 11-9681.

#### Laporte *v.*New York.

App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 101 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 101

   Recommending the integration of Lithuania into the North Atlantic 
       Treaty Organization (NATO) at the earliest possible date.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 19, 1997

   Mr. Rush submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
          referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Recommending the integration of Lithuania into the North Atlantic 
       Treaty Organization (NATO) at the earliest possible date.

Whereas Lithuania has reached a time of great political and economic progress;
Whereas Lithuania has held successful democratic elections since 1991;
Whereas Lithuania has made significant progress toward a more open economy;
Whereas Lithuania has dealt successfully with citizenship and human rights 
        issues by instituting one of the most liberal citizenship laws;
Whereas Lithuania has been on the forefront of several military initiatives, 
        including the Partnership for Peace program and the NATO-led 
        multinational military force in the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina 
        (commonly referred to as ``IFOR''); and
Whereas Lithuania has applied for membership in the North Atlantic Treaty 
        Organization (NATO): Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) Lithuania should be commended for its progress toward 
        political and economic liberty and meeting the guidelines for 
        prospective North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) members 
        set out in chapter 5 of the study on NATO enlargement of 
        September 1995;
            (2) Lithuania would make an outstanding contribution toward 
        furthering the goals of NATO should it become a NATO member;
            (3) eventual extension of full NATO membership to Lithuania 
        would make a singular, lasting contribution toward stability, 
        freedom, and peace in the Baltic region;
            (4) upon complete satisfaction of the aforementioned 
        guidelines and all other criteria for NATO membership, 
        Lithuania should be invited to become a full NATO member at the 
        earliest possible date; and
            (5) Lithuania should be invited to attend the NATO summit 
        in Madrid on July 7 and 8, 1997.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT ITEM 31.2**

 

SECTION302 CERTIFICATION

 

I, Bruce N. Warnercertify that:

 

1.          I have read this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB ofNorthern California Bancorp, Inc.;

 

2.          Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;

 

3.          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;

 

4.          The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant andhave:

 

a)         designed such disclosure controls and procedures toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;

 

b)        evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period (the “EvaluationDate”);

 

5.          The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee or registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

a)         all significant deficiencies in the design oroperation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and haveidentified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internalcontrols; and

 

b)        any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls; and

 

6.          The registrant’s other certifying officer and I haveindicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes ininternal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internalcontrols subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including anycorrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses.

 
| Date:  | August  11, 2005                |   | /s/  Bruce N. Warner |   |
|--------|---------------------------------|--------|----------------------|--------|
|   | Bruce N. Warner                 |
|   | *Chief Financial Officer &* |
|   | *Principal  Accounting Officer* |

 

1

----
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.1



ALPHA AND OMEGA SEMICONDUCTOR LIMITED
AMENDED AND RESTATED 2017 EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PLAN


Amended and Restated on: November 15, 2017


The following Amended and Restated 2017 Executive Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) was established by Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (the “Company”) for the calendar year ending December 31, 2017.


Participants


Executive officers and certain vice presidents of the Company.


Incentive Awards


Participants are eligible to receive incentive awards based on the level of attainment of pre-specified corporate performance goals as established and approved by the Company’s compensation committee. Up to 50% of each such award may be payable in the common shares of the Company, $0.002 par value per share (“Common Shares”), with the remainder to be paid in cash.  The number of shares will be based on the closing price per Common Share on the date the amount of the earned award is determined.


Performance Goals


The corporate performance goals for incentive awards for calendar year 2017 are based on revenue and GAAP operating income. The amount of an incentive award earned is based on the level of attainment of a range of revenue and GAAP operating income for the year. A specified minimum amount of each of the revenue and GAAP operating income goals must be achieved before payment of an award under the Plan. The actual aggregate amount of the award earned by a participant for the calendar year will range from $0 to the maximum amount established for such participant (as set forth below) depending on the level of attainment of the performance goals.


Target Incentive Awards


 The target incentive awards for each participant for the calendar year 2017, as a percentage of such participant's base salary, are as follows:











	
					
	Name
	Title
	Minimum Award
	Target Award
	Maximum Award

	Mike F. Chang
	Chief Executive Officer
	20%
	100%
	 220%

	Yifan Liang
	Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary
	12%
	60%
	132%

	Yueh-Se Ho
	Chief Operating Officer
	12%
	60%
	132%

	Daniel Chang
	Senior Vice President of Marketing
	12%
	60%
	132%








2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-30988

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

KENNAIRE MATHIEU, also known as Bull Mathieu,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:09-CR-391-10

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Kennaire Mathieu

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Mathieu has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

counsel’s assessmentthat the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 19, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-30988 Document: 00511891083 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/19/2012
No. 11-30988

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 11-30988 Document: 00511891083 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/19/2012
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Onyx Acceptance Corporation
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, John W. Hall, President, CEO and Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  |                                                                                            
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ JOHN W. HALL                                                                           
| |  |                                                                                            
| |  | Name: John W. Hall
Title: President, CEO and Principal Executive Officer
Date: May 15, 2003

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 18 - 00286 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF N . P. A., A CHILD On Appeal from the 431st District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. 15 - 01062 - 431, Honorable Jonathan M. Bailey, Presiding



### February 21 , 2019 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PARKER , JJ. Appellant C.L. , proceeding pro se , filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order in a suit to modify the parent - child relationship. We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. The appellate record was due November 19, 2018. The clerk’s record was filed by this deadline, but th e reporter’s record was not. On November 27, the reporter notified the c ourt that C.L. had not requested preparation or made payment arrangements for the reporter’s record. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 35.3(b)(2) , (3) . By letter of November 28, we directed C.L. to request preparation and make acceptable payment arrangements for the reporter’s record by December 10. We also admonished her that failure to comply could2

cause the court to set a deadline for filing her bri ef. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 37.3(c). On December 11, the reporter notified the court that C.L. had not complied with the court’s order. Accordingly, by letter of December 20, we set C.L.’s brief due January 22, 2019. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 37.3(c), 38.6(a). C. L. did not file a brief by the January 22 deadline. By letter o n January 29 , 201 9 , we notified C.L. that her brief was overdue and admonished her that if she did not file a brief by February 8 , the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution without further notice. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). To date, C . L. has not filed a brief or otherwise communicated with the c ourt. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Per Curiam
#### Frederic Paul SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-35004

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed December 28, 2017

Frederic Paul Smith, Pro Se

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Frederic Paul Smith appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing on the basis of sovereign immunity his action against the United States Postal Service (“USPS”) alleging that a USPS employee stole a sapphire he sent through |;he U.S. *420mail. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Harger v. Dep't of Labor,*569 F.3d 898, 903 (9th Cir. 2009). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Smith’s action on the basis of sovereign immunity because the waiver of sovereign immunity under 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b) does not apply to “[a]ny claim arising out of the loss, miscarriage, or negligent transmission of letters or postal matter.” 28 U.S.C. § 2680(b); *see also*28 U.S.C. § 1346(b) (waiving United States sovereign immunity for certain tort actions); *Dolan v. U.S. Postal Serv., et al.,*546 U.S. 481, 487, 126 S.Ct. 1252, 163 L.Ed.2d 1079 (2006) (discussing meaning of “loss” under § 2680(b)).

Contrary to Smith’s contention, the USPS did not waive its sovereign immunity in its letter denying Smith’s administrative claim. *See Gilbert v. DaGrossa,*756 F.2d 1455, 1460 n.6 (9th Cir. 1985) (“A claim for damages against a federal agency is barred by sovereign immunity unless Congress has consented to suit,”).

We do not consider documents not presented to the district court. *See United States v. Elias,*921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990) (“Documents or facts not presented to the district court are not part of the record on appeal.”).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 260

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a commemorative postage stamp

should be issued honoring Paul Leroy Robeson, and that the Citizens’

Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend to the Postmaster General

in 1998, during which occurs the 100th anniversary of Paul Robeson’s

birth, that such a stamp be issued.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 1, 1998

Mr. RUSH (for himself and Mr. PALLONE) submitted the following concurrent

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

and Oversight

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a commemorative

postage stamp should be issued honoring Paul Leroy

Robeson, and that the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend to the Postmaster General in

1998, during which occurs the 100th anniversary of Paul

Robeson’s birth, that such a stamp be issued.

Whereas April 9, 1998, is the centennial of the birth of Paul

Leroy Robeson;

Whereas Paul Leroy Robeson lost his mother, Anna, in a

household fire, and was reared in humble circumstances

as 1 of 5 children in a single-parent household by his fa-
2

•HCON 260 IH

ther, William Drew Robeson, a Presbyterian minister,

who graduated from Lincoln University;

Whereas despite difficult circumstances, as a child, Paul

Leroy Robeson showed significant promise as an honor

student, thespian, and athlete;

Whereas Paul Leroy Robeson graduated from Rutgers University in 1919, with letters in basketball, baseball, discus, shot put, football, and javelin, and, more importantly, was a member of both the Phi Beta Kappa and

Cap and Skull honor societies at Rutgers University;

Whereas Paul Leroy Robeson graduated from Columbia Law

School in 1923, but found the legal profession so resistant to African-American lawyers that he embarked on a

career in the theater and arts which brought him world

renown; and

Whereas Paul Leroy Robeson became an advocate for the

rights of African-Americans and other oppressed people,

and in so doing sacrificed his career as a world-renowned

actor and singer: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) a commemorative postage stamp should be

4 issued by the United States Postal Service honoring

5 Paul Leroy Robeson; and

6 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee

7 should recommend to the Postmaster General that

8 such a stamp be issued.

Æ
Advanced Flight Maneuvers ( * * * ) 

D 

El 

Fly a circle and keep the aircraft nose pointed towards you. 

Be sure to keep the altitude the same and the circle as 

uniform as possible. 

Fly a 4 point square box clockwise while keeping the aircraft 

nose facing in your direction. 

, ----- ----~ \ 

, \ 

I \ 

/ 1'' -w- 1 L ' 

- ------- . -----------

El Fly a 4 point square box counter-clockwise while keeping 

the aircraft nose facing in your direction. 

I 

I 

1 

I 

I , 

, 

7i f1 ----- -----~ I \ 

I \ 

I \ 

I I I -==~::::=:;:*=",......_,:::::::==~==--

• ________ ,. ... ----------· 
Advanced Flight Maneuvers <* * *) 

!JI Fly a 4 point square box clockwise and rotate the 

phantom in the direction of travel. 

' ' ' ' 

_. .. ----------· 

~~ Fly a circle counter-clockwise and keep the aircraft 

nose pointed in the direction of travel. Be sure to keep 

the altitude the same and the circle as uniform as possible. 

B Fly a circle counter-clockwise with the aircraft nose 

pointed at the center ofthe circle. Be sure to keep 

the altitude the same and the circle as uniform as 

possible. 

_._ _____ _ _ ........ ...... ......... 

, 

, 
Advanced Flight Maneuvers <* * *) 

D Fly a figure 8 without rotating the Phantom. Be sure to keep 

the altitude the same and the circle as uniform as possible. 

----- • ----- _ .... ......... , , 

Fly a Figure 8 with the aircraft nose of the Phantom 

pointed in the direction of travel. Be sure to keep the 

altitude the same and the circle as uniform as possible. 

w '~ 

-- --------, ~ ~ 

~ --

~ 

-----~----~-------~ 

- -----,.. 

. '...... .,.,""" -·---- .---

Fly Figure 8 patterns while experimenting with different orientations. 

For example, aircraft nose always pointed in a given direction or 

opposite/left/right the direction of travel, etc. Be sure to keep the 

altitude thesame and the circle as uniform as possible.