alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration [4910-13-P[

N(.1JRRENCf.5 OlIT"''' >l'M"')L 

# AI/,f-! I£tlf( 14 eFR Part 39 

# 059/ (Docket No. FAA-2010-****; Directorate ldentifier 2Ol0-NM-073-AD; Amendme 

# 39/.6J.~tn

2010~_:~B RlN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330-243, -341, -342, and -343 Airplanes Equipped with Rolls-Royce Trent 700 Engines AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), D~pa11mentofTransportation (DOT). ACTION: Final rule; request for comments. SUMMARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) for the products list above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airwbrthiness infonnation (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and C01TCCt an unsafe Wtffil"~ ,\H 

# i/Zl/IO

- O/G

INITIALSffil" c(~ 

# "3/o-z..'

# It 0 condition ouan aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as: During arecent i.n-service event the flight crew ofaTrent 700 powered A330 aircraft reported atemporary Engine Pressure Ratio (EPR) shortfall on engine 2during the take-off phase ofthe flight. 

## * ** Data analysis confirmed atemporary fuel flow restriction and subsequent recovery, and indicated that also engine 1expeli~mced atemporary fuel flow restriction shortly after the initial event on Jngine 2 

### * * *. Based on previous industry-wide experience, the investigation ofthe event bas focused on the posslbllny faTlOeto temporarily restrict the fuel flow 

## * *' 

# I
* '" * 

## * * * *
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 201

Commending the CIA’s statutory Inspector General on his 5-year anniversary

in office.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 21, 1995

Mr. SPECTER (for himself, Mr. KERREY, Mr. GLENN, Mr. BRYAN, Mr. ROBB,

Mr. JOHNSTON, Mr. CHAFEE, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. WARNER, Mr. KERRY,

Mr. SHELBY, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. KYL, Mr. LUGAR, Mr. INHOFE, Mr.

BYRD, and Mr. DEWINE) submitted the following resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Commending the CIA’s statutory Inspector General on his

5-year anniversary in office.

Whereas, because of its concern with the need for objectivity,

authority and independence on the part of the Central

Intelligence Agency’s Office of Inspector General, the

Senate in 1989 included in the Intelligence Authorization

Act of Fiscal Year 1990—subsequently enacted into

law—a provision establishing an independent, Presidentially-appointed statutory Inspector General at the

CIA;

Whereas in November, 1990, the Honorable Frederick P.

Hitz was formally sworn in as the CIA’s first statutory

Inspector General;
2

SRES 201 ATS

Whereas the CIA’s statutory Office of Inspector General,

under the capable leadership of Frederick P. Hitz, has

demonstrated its independence, tenacity, effectiveness

and integrity; and

Whereas the work of the CIA Office of Inspector General

under Mr. Hitz’s leadership has contributed notably to

the greater efficiency, effectiveness, integrity and accountability of the Central Intelligence Agency: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate expresses its congratula2 tions to Frederick P. Hitz on his 5-year anniversary as

3 the first statutory CIA Inspector General and expresses

4 its support for the Office of the CIA Inspector General.

5 SEC. 2. The Secretary of the Senate shall transmit

6 a copy of this resolution to Frederick P. Hitz.

Æ
## NUMBER 13 - 2 1 - 0 0 1 8 5 - CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ MICHAEL MCCANN, TDCJ #879919 , Appellant ,
v. MEGAN THOMPSON, ET AL. , Appellee s .

_

___________________________________________________________ On a ppeal from the 3 6th District Court of Bee County, Texas.

_

___________________________________________________________ 

## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Silva Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras
A ppe l la n t, Michael McCann , a t t e m p t e d t o pe r f e ct a n a pp e a l from a final judgment issued by the trial court

. Appellant is on the list of vexatious litigants compiled by the Office of the Court Administration of the Texas Judicial System, and he has been prohibited from filing any more litigation in Texas courts without permission of a local administrative judge. See T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. & R EM

. C ODE A NN

. § 11.104 ; see generally2 https://www.txcourts.gov/judicial

- data/vexatious

- litigants/

. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the attempted appeal fails to comply with the vexatious litigant statu t e . Appellant was advised that unless he has obtained the permission of the local administrative judge and provided a copy of such order permitting the filing of this appeal w it h i n t e n d a y s f rom t h e d a te o f re c e ipt o f
t h i s no tic e , the appeal would be dismissed

. A ppe l la n t ha s failed to respond to th e Court’s directive and the record before the Court fails to show that appellant obtained the permission of the local administrative judge to file this appeal . With limited exceptions not applicable to this case, "a clerk of

a court may not file a litigation, original proceeding, appeal, or other claim presented by a vexatious litigant subject to a prefiling order under Section 11.101 unless the litigant obtains an order from the local administrative judge permitting the filing. " T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. & R EM

. C ODE A NN

. § 11.103. The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to correct the defect in this matter, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(a),(c).

DORI CONTRERAS Chief Justice
D elivered and filed on the 16th day of September , 202 1

.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Robert Jeffery Liller

,

Appellant,

v.

The State of Texas

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 6

- 00 309

- CR

Appeal from the

109 th District Court

of Andrews County, Texas

(TC# 6568 )

O R D E R

The Reporter’s Record in the above styled and numbered cause was due January 16, 2017,

but it has not been filed. The Court Reporter has notified the Court that Appellant has not made

payment for the preparation of the reporter’s record. On January 27, 2017, Mr. Josh Stephens,

Appellant’s attorney, filed with this Court a letter stating that Appellant’s family is unable to pay

for the reporter’s record and requesting that a hearing be conducted by the trial court to det ermine

if Appellant is indigent.

Before the Court can continue with this appeal, it is ORDERED that the trial court c onduct

a hearing in order to determine if Appellant is indigent and entitled to have the reporter’s record

provided at no cost to him . T he trial court is authorized to en ter any necessary orders and file

them, along with the trial court’s findings, with the District Clerk of Andrews County on or before

February 16, 2017. The District Clerk shall prepare a supplemental clerk’s record containing the2

trial court’s findings a nd/or orders and forward the same to this Court on or before February 26,

2017. Further, the transcription of the hearing shall be prepared, certified and filed with this

Court on or before February 26, 2017.

The due date of the Reporter’s Record will be determined after the trial court’s

findings are filed with this Court.

I T IS SO ORDERED this 2 7 th day of January, 2017

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

BAKER HUGHES, INC.,

Appellant

v.

NALCO COMPANY,

Appellee

______________________ 

2015-1895

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 95/000,524, 

95/001,399.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

CHRISTOPHER AARON SHIELD, Bracewell & Giuliani, 

LLP, Houston, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented 

by JONATHAN R. SPIVEY. 

 JAMES W. PORADEK, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, 

Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellee. Also represented 

by EDMOND AHADOME, LAUREN J. FRANK, TIMOTHY E.

GRIMSRUD; ROBERT J. BARZ, DEVON C. BEANE, JASON 

ALEXANDER ENGEL, K&L Gates LLP, Chicago, IL.

______________________ 
 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (REYNA, WALLACH, and STOLL, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 15, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
No. 11-10208.

#### Clark *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-

tiorari denied.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6388** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v.
WILLIE ALLEN , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington
. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. ( 7:03

- cr - 00067

- F

- 1; 7:15

- cv - 00167

- F )

Submitted : July 1 5 , 2016 Decided: August 2, 2016

Before MOTZ, KING, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by un published per curiam opinion
. Willie Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Ernest Myers, II, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Willie Allen appeals the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We vacate the district court’s order and remand for further proceedings. Allen pled guilty to po ssession of a firearm by a convicted felon, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2012). The district court determined that Allen, who had three prior convictions of violent felonies, qualified as an armed career criminal. See 18
U.S.C. § 924(e)(1) (2012). Allen was s entenced to 180 months in prison. Two of the three prior convictions were for North Carolina common law robbery. Allen contended in his § 2255 motion that, under Johnson v. United States , 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), these convictions were no longer valid pre dicates for armed career criminal status. We recently held that a conviction of North Carolina common law robbery does not categorically qualify as a violent felony under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA). United States v. Gardner , __ F.3d __, 2016 WL 2893881, at *7 (4th Cir. May 18, 2016) (No. 14

- 4533). In Gardner , we determined that such a conviction falls not under the “force” clause of ACCA, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(i), but instead under ACCA’s residual clause, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). In li ght of Johnson , which invalidated the residual clause and applies retroactively to cases on collateral review, Welch v. United3 States , 136 S. Ct. 1257 (2016), we conclude that Allen’s common law robbery convictions cannot serve as predicate violent felonie s for armed career criminal status. We accordingly grant a certificate of appealability, vacate the district court’s order, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. The motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense wit h oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**I, Charles D. Johnston, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of QualMark Corporation (the “smallbusiness issuer”);  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC release34-47986.]c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 10, 2007                                                                     /s/ Charles D. Johnston   Charles D. Johnston   President & Chief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roberto Ayala AMARILLAS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-50033

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed December 22, 2017

Emily J, Keifer, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Anne Kristina Perry, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Helen H. Hong, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the US Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Benjamin J. Cheeks, Attorney, Law Offices of Benjamin J. Cheeks, A.P.C., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2),

MEMORANDUM **

Roberto Ayala Amarillas appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 27-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for attempted reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, We have ju*500risdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Ayala contends that the district court improperly relied on his criminal history as a reason to deny the parties’ joint request for a fast-track departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K3.1. The court did not abuse its discretion. *See United States v. Rosales-Gonzales,*801 F.3d 1177, 1184 (9th Cir. 2015) (district court properly exercised its discretion to deny fast-track departure on the basis of defendant’s immigration and criminal history). Moreover, the 27-month sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including his failure to be deterred by a previous 37-month sentence. *See Rosales-Gonzales,*801 F.3d at 1184-85.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### Kenneth B. QUANSAH, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEL CORONADO APARTMENTS; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-16244

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed December 26, 2017

Kenneth B. Quansah, Jr., Pro Se

Matthew Gregory Geisick, Law Offices of John H. Coward, Los Gatos, CA, for Defendants-Appellees

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

•MEMORANDUM **

Kenneth B. Quansah, Jr. appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action for failure to effect proper service of the summons and complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion, *Oyama v. Sheehan (In re Sheehan),*253 F.3d 507, 511 (9th Cir. 2001), and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Quansah’s action because Quansah failed to effect proper service of the summons and complaint and did not demonstrate good cause for failing to serve properly, despite being given notice and an opportunity to do so. *See*Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) (outlining requirements for proper service, and explaining that district court may dismiss, an action for failure to serve “after notice to the plaintiff’); *In re Sheehan,*253 F.3d at 512 (discussing Rule 4(m)’s “good cause” standard).

Quansah’s request for attorney’s fees, set forth in his opening brief, is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 171

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Declaring the city of Roanoke, Virginia, to be the

Services Memorial Service.official site of the National Emergency Medical
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 171

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas in 1928 Julian Stanley Wise founded the first

volunteer rescue squad in United States, the Roanoke

Life Saving and First Aid Crew, and Virginia has

subsequently taken the lead in honoring the thousands of people nationwide who give their time and

energy to community rescue squads through the establishment of To The Rescue, a museum located in
2

•HCON 171 EH

Roanoke devoted to emergency medical services

(EMS) personnel;

Whereas to further recognize the selfless contributions of

EMS personnel nationwide, the Virginia Association

of Volunteer Rescue Squads, Inc., and the Julian

Stanley Wise Foundation, in conjunction with To

The Rescue, in 1993 organized the first annual National Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Memorial

Service at Greene Memorial United Methodist

Church in Roanoke, Virginia, to honor EMS personnel from across the country who have died in the line

of duty;

Whereas the annual National EMS Memorial Service has

captured national attention by honoring 119 providers of emergency medical services from 35 States;

Whereas the singular devotion of EMS personnel to the

safety and welfare of their fellow citizens is worthy

of the highest praise;

Whereas the annual National EMS Memorial Service is

a fitting reminder of the bravery and sacrifice of

EMS personnel nationwide;

Whereas according to the Department of Health and

Human Services, 170,000 Americans require emergency medical services on an average day, a number

which projects to over 60,000,000 people annually;

and

Whereas the life of every American will be affected, directly or indirectly, by the uniquely skilled and dedicated efforts of EMS personnel who work bravely and

tirelessly to preserve America’s greatest resource—

people: Now, therefore, be it
3

•HCON 171 EH

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. OFFICIAL SITE OF NATIONAL MEMORIAL SERV4 ICE.

5 The Congress declares the City of Roanoke, Virginia,

6 to be the official site of the National Emergency Medical

7 Services Memorial Service to honor emergency medical

8 services personnel who have died in the line of duty.

9 SEC. 2. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

10 Nothing in this resolution shall be construed to place

11 the National Emergency Medical Services Memorial Serv12 ice under Federal authority or to require any expenditure

13 of Federal funds.

Passed the House of Representatives May 19, 1998.

Attest:

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,778,871
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,095,955
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (951,234)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,984,471
<PP&E>                                       4,792,910
<DEPRECIATION>                              (3,980,217)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,228,916
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,171,911
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           588
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,988,603
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,228,916
<SALES>                                      5,218,152
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,218,152
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,470,711
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              49,545
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (252,226)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (252,226)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (252,226)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.06)
        

</TABLE>