alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dolan Chemical Laboratory 4001 Bixby Road Groveport, OH 43125 T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221 F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168 http://aepenv/labs 

### Water Analysis Form REP-703 Rev. 1, 11/2013



### Location: Amos Plant Report Date: 3/19/2014 Sample Number: 140830-001 Date Collected:03/11/2014 08:33 Date Received:3/11/2014 

### Clearwater Pond at Weir Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 13.0 2 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 0.8 03/14/2014 

### Sample Number: 140830-002 Date Collected:03/11/2014 08:37 Date Received:3/11/2014 

### Recirculation Pond Outlet at Weir Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 8.09 2 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 0.8 03/14/2014 

### Sample Number: 140830-003 Date Collected:03/11/2014 08:37 Date Received:3/11/2014 

### FGD Landfill Discharge to Pond Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 312 50 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 20 03/14/2014 

### Sample Number: 140830-004 Date Collected:03/11/2014 09:15 Date Received:3/11/2014 

### WWTP Outlet Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 341 50 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 20 03/14/2014 

### Sample Number: 140830-005 Date Collected:03/11/2014 08:54 Date Received:3/11/2014 

## Secondary Clarifier Outlet B Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 344 20 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 8 03/14/2014 

### Sample Number: 140830-006 Date Collected:03/11/2014 08:50 Date Received:3/11/2014 

### Secondary Clarifier Outlet A Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 357 20 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 8 03/14/2014 

### Sample Number: 140830-007 Date Collected:03/11/2014 09:01 Date Received:3/11/2014 

## Primary Clarifier Outlet B Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 2960 50 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 20 03/14/2014 Amos Plant, 140830 Page 1 of 2

### Location: Amos Plant Report Date: 3/19/2014 Sample Number: 140830-008 Date Collected:03/11/2014 09:03 Date Received:3/11/2014 

### Primary Clarifier Outlet A Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 2990 50 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 20 03/14/2014 

### Sample Number: 140830-009 Date Collected:03/11/2014 08:57 Date Received:3/11/2014 

### WWTP Inlet Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 331000 10000 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 4000 03/14/2014

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. U: Analyte was analyzed and not detected at or above adjusted Method Detection Limit J: Analyte was positively identified, though the quantitation was below Reporting Limit. Brian Snyder, Chemist II Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224 Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Amos Plant, 140830 Page 2 of 2
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 233

To recognize and support the efforts of the United States Soccer Federation

to bring the 1999 Women’s World Cup tournament to the United States.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 27 (legislative day, MARCH 26), 1996

Ms. SNOWE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

RESOLUTION

To recognize and support the efforts of the United States

Soccer Federation to bring the 1999 Women’s World

Cup tournament to the United States.

Whereas soccer is one of the world’s most popular sports;

Whereas the Women’s World Cup tournament is the single

most important women’s soccer event;

Whereas the 1995 Women’s World Cup tournament was

broadcast to millions of fans in 67 nations;

Whereas the United States Soccer Federation is attempting

to bring the 1999 Women’s World Cup tournament to

the United States;

Whereas the United States is capable of meeting all of the

requirements of a host country, including financing,
2

•SRES 233 IS

transportation, security, communication, and physical accommodations;

Whereas the United States successfully hosted the 1994

Men’s World Cup tournament in nine cities throughout

the Nation; and

Whereas the 1999 Women’s World Cup tournament will contribute to national and international goodwill because the

tournament will bring people from many nations together

in friendly competition: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) recognizes and supports the efforts of the

3 United States Soccer Federation to bring the 1999

4 Women’s World Cup tournament to the United

5 States; and

6 (2) requests that the President of the United

7 States designate appropriate Federal agencies to

8 work with the United States Soccer Federation to

9 meet the Federation Internationale de Football As10 sociation’s requirements for the 1999 Women’s

11 World Cup tournament host country.

Æ
STEAM ELECTRIC

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: ________________________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.

SE04360A160
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Migo Software, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard Liebman,
      Chief
      Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material


respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





The
      foregoing Certification shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any
      general statement incorporating by reference this report into any filing under
      the Securities Act of 1933 or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except
      to the extent that we specifically incorporate this information by reference,
      and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.





Date:
      November 14, 2007





/s/ Richard
              LiebmanRichard
                Liebman
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 29, 2011

y0321 

# Order

March 29, 2011

141533

JOYCE YURSCO, Personal Representative of the Estate of PEARL BUNZOW, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141533 COA: 291187 Saginaw CC: 06-062602-NH K.K. RAVINDRAN, M.D ., K.K. RAVINDRAN, M.D., P.C., and VALLEY CARDIOLOGY, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 24, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: __2011-NM-___216______-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 725 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the estate tax 

and retain stepped-up basis at death. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2015 

Mr. LATTA (for himself, Mr. JONES, Mr. MESSER, Mr. JOYCE, Mr. 

FARENTHOLD, Mr. GOSAR, Mr. POE of Texas, Mr. LONG, Mr. JODY B. 

HICE of Georgia, and Mr. DUNCAN of Tennessee) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the estate tax and retain stepped-up basis at death. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Permanently Repeal 

5 the Estate Tax Act of 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 725 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF ESTATE TAX AND RETENTION OF BASIS 

2 STEP-UP. 

3 Effective for estates of decedents dying after Decem4 ber 31, 2014, chapter 11 of the Internal Revenue Code 

5 of 1986 is repealed. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-13-0000165 

03-SEP-2014 

08:13 AM 

SCWC-13-0000165
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
 

IN THE INTEREST OF PP, a minor


Date of Birth: May 29, 1996 


CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS 

(CAAP-13-0000165; FC-J NO. 0093930) 

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack and Wilson, JJ.) 

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee State of Hawaii’s 

Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on July 23, 2014, is hereby 

rejected. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, September 3, 2014. 

Sonja P. McCullen

for petitioner
 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald


/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack
 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF EMBASSY ACQUISITION CORPORATION FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO 
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         769,277
<SECURITIES>                                 6,494,156
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,461
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,264,894
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,264,894
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,517
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           254
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,213,123
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,264,894
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           26,246
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,246
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (116,100)      
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0       
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 89,854
<INCOME-TAX>                                    33,798      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             56,056
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    56,056
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 15.1





PowerCerv Corporation
400 North Ashley Drive, Suite 2700
Tampa, Florida  33602


Gentlemen:

Re:      Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-3960)


With respect to the above referenced registration statement, we acknowledge our
awareness of the incorporation by reference therein of our report dated April
17, 1998 related to our review of interim financial information, which report
is included in the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PowerCerv Corporation for
the three months ended March 31, 1998.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the
meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.





                                     /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                                     KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


Tampa, Florida
April 17, 1998
----

----

| (1)    | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period      ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| (2)    | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company.                                                                                                                          |

| Date:      November 5, 2009 | /s/ Patrick J. Goodman                                 |   |
|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                        | Patrick      J. Goodman                                |   |
|                        | Senior      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                        | (principal      financial officer)                     |   |

----

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Joel HERRERA-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-10207 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed January 24, 2018

Emily Baker Falconer, James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Christopher Allen Curtis, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Michael Arthur Leh-mann, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before KING, ELROD, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Joel Herrera-Garcia appeals the 14-month sentence imposed after he pleaded guilty to being in the United States illegally after deportation. The sentence was an upward variance from the advisory guideline maximum sentence of eight months.

Herrera-Garcia has failed to show that the sentence was substantively unreasonable. He argues that the district court improperly weighed the sentencing factors of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and based the variance on criminal history that had already been taken into account in the guideline calculation. He asserts that his criminal history consists of “relatively minor, nonviolent offenses.” This argument is unavailing because a sentencing court may disagree with the Guidelines on policy grounds and may conclude that the Guidelines give too little or too much weight to one or more sentencing factors. *See United States v. Williams,*517 F.3d 801, 809 (5th Cir. 2008). Ultimately, Herrera-Garcia invites us to adopt his assessment of the sentencing factors rather than the district court’s. This is contrary to the required deferential review mandated by the Supreme Court, even if this court might think that a lesser sentence would have been reasonable. *See Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). The sentence is affirmed.

The parties agree that Herrera-Garcia’s request that the judgment be corrected is moot. The district court has ordered that the judgment be corrected to show that Herrera-Garcia was convicted under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and not § 1326(b). This part of the appeal is dismissed.

*315AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth' in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10Q AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997             MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          38,768                  38,768
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,081                   2,081
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,302                  41,302
<PP&E>                                           1,352                   1,352
<DEPRECIATION>                                     891                     891
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,683                  42,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,504                   3,504
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        43,972                  43,972
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,800)                 (4,800)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,683                  42,683
<SALES>                                          2,373                   8,138
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,373                   8,138
<CGS>                                              632                   1,788
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      632                   1,788
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,386                   8,871
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (489)                 (1,457)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,156)                 (1,064)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                      40
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,156)                 (1,104)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,156)                 (1,104)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.14)                  (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)                  (0.14)
        

</TABLE>
Order entered September 20, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00974 - CV SEMON BONNER, Appellant

V. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MO RTGAGE, Appellee On Appeal from the C ounty Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 19 - 02290 - B



### O RDER T his appeal s tems from the same underlying cause and judgment as appellate cause number 05

- 19

- 00637

- CV. Accordingly, on the Court’s own motion, we CONSOLIDATE this
a ppeal into appellate cause number 05

- 19

- 00637

- CV. We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to transfer all documents from this appeal into appellate cause number 05

- 19

- 00637

- CV. For administrative purposes, this appeal is treated as a closed case. The parties, trial court clerk, and court reporter shall no w use only appellate cause number 05

- 19

- 00637

- CV. /s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE