alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012049EN.01002302.xml

| 18.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/23

---

Order of the General Court of 13 December 2011 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-311/09 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Civil Service - Officials - Social security - Reimbursement of medical expenses - Decision of the Commission refusing 100 % reimbursement of certain medical expenses incurred by the applicant - Distortion - Duty to state reasons - Investigation - Act adversely affecting the appellant - Authority of res judicata - Lis pendens - Confirmatory act)

2012/C 49/41

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, acting as Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) delivered on 20 May 2009 in Case F-73/08 Marcuccio v Commission seeking the annulment of that order

Marcuccio

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Luigi Marcuccio shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission at the present instance. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Luigi Marcuccio shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission at the present instance.

---

(1)  OJ C 233, 26.9.2009.

1

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 15, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129340 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 129340 

 COA: 251043 

Saginaw CC: 02-021253-FC 

STEPHEN XAVIE COCHRANE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 12, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would reverse and remand this case to the circuit court for a new trial. 

s1208 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 15, 2005 

Clerk
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 59

To authorize the printing of a collection of the rules of the committees

of the Senate.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 17 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 1995

Mr. LOTT (for Mr. STEVENS) submitted the following resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize the printing of a collection of the rules of

the committees of the Senate.

1 Resolved, That a collection of the rules of the commit2 tees of the Senate, together with related materials, be

3 printed as a Senate document, and that there be printed

4 600 additional copies of such document for the use of the

5 Committee on Rules and Administration.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on Wednesday, March 30, 2022 at 11:30 a.m.

# PLACE:

                        The meeting will be webcast on the Commission's website at                         *www.sec.gov.*

# STATUS:

                        This meeting will begin at 11:30 a.m. (ET) and will be open to the public via webcast on the Commission's website at                         *www.sec.gov.*

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. The Commission will consider whether to propose amendments regarding special purpose acquisition companies, shell companies, the use of projections in Commission filings and a rule addressing the status of special purpose acquisition companies under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.)

Dated: March 23, 2022.

Vanessa A. Countryman,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-06533 Filed 3-24-22; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,977
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           8,221
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          91,019
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            90,511
<LOANS>                                        416,238
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,238
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 535,204
<DEPOSITS>                                     444,151
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                  0
<LONG-TERM>                                      6,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        39,222
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,897
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 535,204
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 16,631
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,998
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   134
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                19,763
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,313
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,404
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,359
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 394
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,142
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,407
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,830
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,830
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .63
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.82
<LOANS-NON>                                        839 
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    998
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,251
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       21
<RECOVERIES>                                         8
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,238
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               404
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            834
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Feliciano LOPEZ-CASTILLO Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-2105

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: December 7, 2017

Filed: December 12, 2017

Thomas More Hollenhorst, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Feliciano Lopez-Castillo, Pro Se

Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Feliciano Lopez-Castillo directly appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he pled guilty to a drug offense. His counsel moves for leave to withdraw, and has submitted a brief under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). The government has filed a motion to dismiss based on the appeal waiver. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court dismisses the appeal.

Counsel challenges the calculation of Lopez-Castillo’s Guidelines imprisonment range, but concedes that the appeal waiver is applicable and enforceable. This court concludes that the appeal waiver is enforceable. *See United States v. Scott,*627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo review of validity and applicability of appeal waiver). The record establishes that Lopez-Castillo entered into the plea agreement and the appeal waiver knowingly and voluntarily, that the arguments on appeal fall within the scope of the waiver, and that no miscarriage of justice would result from enforcing the waiver. *See United States v. Andis,*333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc). An independent review of the record reveals no non-frivolous *485issues for appeal outside the scope of the waiver. *See Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988).

The appeal is dismissed.-Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

1

. The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Court Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Exhibit 32(a)

                                 Certification

           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
            (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of
                       the Title 18, United States Code)

In connection with the Report of Long Island Physician Holdings Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul
Kolker, President and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ PAUL KOLKER
---------------------------------
Paul Kolker,
President, Chairman of the Board

February 3, 2004

This certification accompanies the above-described Report on Form 10-Q pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 52 (Wednesday, March 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 14229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06183]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending February 28, 2014

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 302.201 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2015-0041.
    Date Filed: February 25, 2015.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: March 18, 2015.
    Description: Application of Asia Atlantic Airlines Co. Ltd. 
requesting an exemption and a foreign air carrier permit authorizing it 
to engage in charter foreign air transportation of persons, property 
and mail from any point or points in Thailand to any point or points in 
the United States, and beyond to the full extent permitted by the Air 
Transport Agreement of September 19, 2005 between the Government of the 
United States of America and the Government of the Kingdom of Thailand 
(the ``U.S.--Thailand Agreement'').

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2015-0043.
    Date Filed: February 26, 2015.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: March 19, 2015.
    Description: Application of 21 Air, LLC requesting a certificate of 
public convenience and necessity authorizing it to conduct foreign 
charter air transportation of property and mail with large aircraft.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2015-0044.
    Date Filed: February 26, 2015.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: March 19, 2015.
    Description: Application of 21 Air, LLC requesting a certificate of 
public convenience and necessity authorizing it to conduct interstate 
charter air transportation of property and mail with large aircraft.

Barbara J. Hairston,
Supervisory Dockets Officer, Docket Operations, Federal Register 
Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2015-06183 Filed 3-17-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 54 (Monday, March 21, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 16043]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05960]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 87 FR 14306, March 
14, 2022.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: Thursday, March 17, 
2022 at 2 p.m.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: The Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
March 17, 2022 at 2:00 p.m., has been cancelled.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information; please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.)

    Dated: March 16, 2022.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-05960 Filed 3-17-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6561** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. JOHNNIE BUTLER, a/k/a JR , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. David A. Faber, S e nior District Judge. ( 1:08

- cr - 00381

- DAF

- 1; 1:12

- cv - 03468

- DAF )

Submitted : October 17, 2016 Decided: October 28, 2016

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Johnnie Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Marie Celeste, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Joshua Thomas Ferrentino, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding preced ent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Johnnie Butler seeks to appeal the district court’s order s denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003) . When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. a t 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Butler has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**STATEMENT      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE **

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| A)   | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)                or 78o(d)) and |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| B)   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of the dates and for the periods covered by the                Report. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                                   |                       |                                 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                   |                       |
|                                                                                                                                                                              |                  |                            |
| Dated:              September 8,              2006                       | By:              | /s/              Andrew Gordon  |
|                                                                                                                                                                                   | Andrew              Gordon |
|                                                                                                                                                                                   |                       |
H. Con. Res. 214 Agreed to October 12, 1998

One Hundred Fifth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-eight

Concurrent Resolution

Whereas the cities of Bristol, Tennessee, and Bristol, Virginia,

have long been a gathering place for musicians from the nearby

mountainous countryside;

Whereas phonographic recordings made in Bristol in August of

1927 launched the careers of the Carter Family and Jimmie

Rodgers, who are recognized as the first commercially successful

modern Country Music artists;

Whereas these recordings have been called the ‘‘Big Bang of Country

Music’’ by the Country Music Foundation in its publication ‘‘Country, the Music and the Musicians’’;

Whereas Jimmie Rodgers has been named the Father of Country

Music and was the first artist to be inducted into the Country

Music Hall of Fame;

Whereas the original members of the Carter Family have been

recognized as Country Music’s First Family in part because their

works have had an unparalleled influence on succeeding generations of Country Music artists;

Whereas ‘‘The Roots of Country Music’’, a three-part television

series which aired nationally on the Turner Broadcasting System

in June of 1996, recognized the significant contribution of the

cities of Bristol to the development and commercial acceptance

of Country Music;

Whereas in 1984 the Tennessee Senate recognized Bristol as the

‘‘Birthplace of Country Music’’; and

Whereas in 1995, the Virginia General Assembly recognized Bristol

as the ‘‘Birthplace of Country Music’’: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That the Congress—

(1) recognizes the critical contributions of the cities of

Bristol, Tennessee, and Bristol, Virginia, and their residents

to the origins and development of Country Music;

(2) congratulates the cities of Bristol, Tennessee, and

Bristol, Virginia, for launching with the Bristol recordings of

1927 the careers of the Nation’s first widely known Country

Music artists; and
H. Con. Res. 214—2

(3) acknowledges and commends the cities of Bristol,

Tennessee, and Bristol, Virginia, as the birthplace of Country

Music, a style of music which has enjoyed broad commercial

success in the United States and throughout much of the world.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
No. D-2725.

#### In re Discipline of Jean-Baptiste.

Constant Jean-Baptiste, Jr., of Brooklyn, N. Y., is suspended from the prac*904tice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 145

To elect Martin P. Paone Secretary for the Minority.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 29 (legislative day, JUNE 19), 1995

Mr. DASCHLE submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

To elect Martin P. Paone Secretary for the Minority.

1 Resolved, That Martin P. Paone be, and he is hereby,

2 elected Secretary for the Minority of the Senate, effective

3 July 11, 1995.

Æ