alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of Fuda Group (USA) Corporation (the
"Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2014 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ Xiaobin Wu
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer
Date: April 2, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,600,181
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               55,030,450
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             127,552,919
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  39,894,862
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               127,552,919
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               100,045
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,096,118
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,126,419
<INCOME-TAX>                                   468,540
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            657,829
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>
#### IN RE: Norman Alan KERR, Petitioner.

No. 17-2115

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 11, 2018

Decided: February 20, 2018

Norman Alan Kerr, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

*260Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Norman Alan Kerr has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus and a motion to amend the petition, alleging the district court has unreasonably delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion to vacate. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Kerr also has filed a supplemental petition for a writ of mandamus in which he requests recusal of the district court judge and an evidentiary hearing.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. *Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court,*426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976); *United States v. Moussaoui,*333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. *In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n,*860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. *In re Lockheed Martin Corp.,*503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007).

Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court dismissed Kerr’s § 2255 motion and denied and dismissed his additional motions pending in that proceeding on December 21, 2017.' Accordingly, because the district court has ruled recently on Kerr’s motions, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, grant Kerr’s motion to amend his mandamus petition, deny as moot the mandamus petition as amended, and deny Kerr’s motions for a transcript at government expense. Additionally, because Kerr has not established extra-judicial bias, *see In re Beard,*811 F.2d 818, 826-27 (4th Cir. 1987), or a clear right to relief in the form of an evidentiary hearing, we deny his supplemental petition for a writ of mandamus.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITIONS DENIED*
**COURT OF APPEALS**

**TENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS**

****

December 14, 2016

No. 10-16-00410-CR

IN RE NELSON PARNELL, JR.

Original Proceeding

**JUDGMENT**

	The Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed by Nelson Parnell, Jr. has been considered by the Court.  The Court has determined the Petition for Writ of Mandamus should be and hereby is denied.

	A copy of this judgment will be certified by the Clerk of this Court and delivered to the trial court.

						PER CURIAM

****SHARRI ROESSLER, CLERK

By: ___________________________

				Nita Whitener, Deputy Clerk

# image1.png

# image2.jpeg

# image3.png
**EXHIBITITEM 32.2**

 

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

 

 

The certification set forth below is being submittedto the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complyingwith Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

 

August 11, 2004

 

Bruce N. Warner, the Chief Financial Officer of Northern CaliforniaBancorp, Inc. certifies:

 

1.               that this periodicreport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.               that informationcontained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Northern CaliforniaBancorp, Inc..

 

 
|   | /s/ Bruce N. Warner              |   |
|--------|----------------------------------|--------|
|   | Bruce N. Warner                  |
|   | Chief Financial Officer and      |
|   | **Principal Accounting Officer** |

 

----
H. Con. Res. 206 Agreed to March 18, 1998

One Hundred Fifth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-eight

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That the rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used

from 8 o’clock ante meridian until 3 o’clock post meridian on April

23, 1998, for a ceremony as part of the commemoration of the

days of remembrance of victims of the Holocaust. Physical preparations for the ceremony shall be carried out in accordance with

such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 215 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 215

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 29, 1998

      Received and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Congratulating the people of the Co-operative Republic of Guyana for 
                     holding multiparty elections.

Whereas the people of Guyana voted on December 15, 1997, to re-elect the ruling 
        party, the People's Progressive Party/Civic (PPP/Civic);
Whereas the Guyanese people showed their strong belief in the democratic process 
        by approximately an 88 percent voter turnout; and
Whereas although international observers such as the Organization of American 
        States (OAS), the Commonwealth, and the International Foundation of 
        Electoral Systems (IFES) have unanimously agreed, based on their 
        observations on election day, that the polling process was free and 
        fair, it has been alleged that violations occurred in the counting 
        process, necessitating an audit of the elections by the Caribbean 
        Community (CARICOM): Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) congratulates the people of Guyana for holding 
        multiparty presidential elections;
            (2) supports the audit of the elections by the Caribbean 
        Community (CARICOM), an organization deemed acceptable to all 
        parties;
            (3) calls on all parties to respect the outcome of the 
        audit as the final decision and make a vow to peace and 
        stability in Guyana; and
            (4) calls on the newly elected president and the opposition 
        leadership of the Co-operative Republic of Guyana to respect 
        the rule of law and human rights.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 28, 1998.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-22-00107-CR

RAHEEM KERRY ONEIL MARSHALL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 123rd District Court

Panola County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-C-248

Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice van Cleef
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Raheem Kerry Oneil Marshall has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The 

motion was signed by both Marshall and his appellate counsel in compliance with Rule 42.2(a) 

of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). As authorized by Rule 

42.2(a), we grant the motion. See id.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

Charles van Cleef

Justice

Date Submitted: January 23, 2023

Date Decided: January 24, 2023

Do Not Publish
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 **ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreementdated as of February 1, 2015, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGESECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asGeneral Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Special Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK,N.A., as NCB Master Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A., as NCB SpecialServicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator, andCustodian, and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respectto Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C26 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shallhave the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton,Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.      A review of the activities of the General Master Servicer duringthe period from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “ReportingPeriod”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has beenmade under my supervision, and

 

2.      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the General MasterServicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in allmaterial respects throughout the the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
**EXHIBIT ITEM 32.2**

 

SECTION 906CERTIFICATION

 

The certification set forth below is beingsubmitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose ofcomplying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode.

 

August 13,2009

 

BruceN. Warner, the Chief Financial Officer of Northern California Bancorp, Inc.certifies:

 

c.               thatthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

d.              thatinformation contained in this Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Northern California Bancorp, Inc.

 

 
|   | /s/ Bruce N. Warner          |
|--------|------------------------------|
|   | Bruce N. Warner              |
|   | Chief Financial Officer  and |
|   | Principal Accounting Officer |

 

----
#### Shizue S. WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AURORA LOAN SERVICING LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-15096

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted November 15, 2017 *

Filed November 20, 2017

Shizue S. White, Pro Se

Justin Donald Balser, Ashley Elizabeth Calhoun, Melissa L. Cizmorris, Attorneys, Akerman Senterfitt LLP, Denver, CO, for Defendants-Appellees

*550Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Shizue S. White appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing her action alleging federal and state law claims arising from foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the denial of a motion to remand, *Or. Bureau of Labor v. IBS. W. Commc’ns, Inc.,*288 F.3d 414, 417 (9th Cir. 2002), and we affirm.

The district court properly denied White’s motion to remand to state court because White failed to establish the requirements for abstention under *Burford v. Sun Oil Co.,*319 U.S. 315, 63 S.Ct. 1098, 87 L.Ed. 1424 (1943). *See Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co. v. Quackenbush,*87 F.3d 290, 294, 296 (9th Cir. 1996) (setting forth requirements for *Burford*abstention and standard of review for whether abstention requirements have been met).

In her opening brief, White fails to challenge the district court’s dismissal of her action, and thus she has waived any such challenge. *See Smith v. Marsh,*194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[0]n appeal, arguments not raised by a party in its opening brief are deemed waived.”); *see also Greenwood v. FAA,*28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir. 1994) (“We will not manufacture arguments for an appellant, and a bare assertion does not preserve a claim.... ”).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**EXHIBITITEM 31.1**

**SECTION302 CERTIFICATION**

I, Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr. certify that:

1.         I have read this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB ofNorthern California Bancorp, Inc.;

2. Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15eand 15d-15e) for the registrant and have:

a)              designed such disclosure controls and procedures toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;

b)             evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period (the “EvaluationDate”); and

c)              presented in this quarterly report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on ourevaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee or registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)              all significant deficiencies in the design oroperation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and haveidentified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internalcontrols; and

b)             any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls; and

6. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whetherthere were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors thatcould significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our mostrecent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses.
| Date: November 10, 2006 | /s/ Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr. |   |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------|--------|
|                    | Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr.     |   |
|                    | Chairman of the Board &     |   |
|                    | Chief Executive Officer         |   |

 

----
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00348-CV

In re Joe Allen Holubec, Jr.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Joe Allen Holubec, Jr., has filed a pro se original petition for writ of habeas corpus

seeking relief from sentences imposed in cause numbers 05-1107-K277 and 05-1134-K277 in the

227th District Court of Williamson County. We dismiss the petition for want of jurisdiction.

This Court has such original jurisdiction as may be prescribed by law. Tex. Const.

art. 5, § 6. We may issue the writ of habeas corpus only when the restraint of liberty arises out of

a civil case. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(d) (West 2004). This Court does not have original

habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal law matters. Ex parte Hawkins, 885 S.W.2d 586, 588

(Tex. App.—El Paso 1994, orig. proceeding). Based on the allegations in the petition, it appears that

Holubec must seek relief pursuant to article 11.07. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07

(West Supp. 2008).
2

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed.

__________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Pemberton and Waldrop

Filed: July 2, 2009
Pete Ricketts Gove rnor

Mark Hague Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region VII 11201 Renner Blvd. Lenexa, KS 66219 Dear Mr. Hague: September 16,2016 STATE OF NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Jim Macy Director Suite 400, The Atrium 1200 'N' Street P . O . Box 98922 Lincoln, Nebraska 68509·8922 Phone (402) 471·2186

FAX (402)471-2909 website : http: //dcq.ne.gov

Attached is the Nebraska Department ofEnvironmental Quality's Sixth RCRA Program Revision Application for the updating and continued authorization ofthe Nebraska hazardous waste program. The application includes rules from RCRA clusters I, II, III, VI, IX, X, XI, XII, XV, XXIII, and XXIV; all current rules for the Land Disposal Restrictions under 40 C.F.R. Part 268; all current rules for Organic Air Emissions Standards for Tanks, Surface Impoundments, and Containers; and the RCRA Corrective Action program. This submission meets all requirements of40 C.F.R. Part 271 applicable to revision of state programs. Should you have any questions, please contact Brian McMullen at 402-471-0270 or brian.mcmullen@nebraska.gov .

irector Nebraska Department ofEnvironmental Quality

An E qual Opportunity Em p loyer
|WELLS
    FARGO(logo) | Commercial
    Mortgage ServicingD1050-084, 8th Floor
401 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334
|--------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby made to that
certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2014, by and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC.,
as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor, and CITIBANK N.A., as Certificate Administrator
and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-GC25
(the “Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement,
I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the
Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its
performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based
on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout
the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this
Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2018.



/s/ Daniel Bober



---

Daniel Bober

Executive
Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank



Together we’ll
go far

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.