alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Thomas M. Siebel, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of Siebel Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Siebel Systems, Inc.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand
hereto as of the 30th day of April 2004.

|/s/ Thomas M. SiebelChairman and CEO(Principal Executive
      Officer)
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------

I, Kenneth A. Goldman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of Siebel Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Siebel Systems, Inc.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand
hereto as of the 30th day of April 2004.

|/s/ Kenneth A. GoldmanSenior Vice President, Finance
      andAdministration and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial
      Officer)
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which
it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Siebel Systems, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q),
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6881

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KATO HAINESWORTH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (CR-98-30, CA-00-409-3)

Submitted: September 18, 2001 Decided: October 16, 2001

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kato Hainesworth, Appellant Pro Se. S. David Schiller, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Kato Hainesworth seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West

Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Hainesworth, Nos. CR-98-

30; CA-00-409-3 (E.D. Va. May 21, 2001). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2018048EN.01000301.xml

| 9.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 February 2018

(2018/C 48/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2252 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,31 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4422 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87513 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,8968 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1555 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 125,20 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6860 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,247 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,96 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1695 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6520 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,6701 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5694 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5402 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5795 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6966 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6288 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 335,37 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,8007 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7549 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4398 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 721,53 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8183 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,308 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 70,8858 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,010 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,0034 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,9938 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,7715 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2252

JPY

Japanese yen

134,31

DKK

Danish krone

7,4422

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87513

SEK

Swedish krona

9,8968

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1555

ISK

Iceland króna

125,20

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6860

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,247

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,96

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1695

RON

Romanian leu

4,6520

TRY

Turkish lira

4,6701

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5694

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5402

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5795

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6966

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6288

KRW

South Korean won

1 335,37

ZAR

South African rand

14,8007

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7549

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4398

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 721,53

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8183

PHP

Philippine peso

63,308

RUB

Russian rouble

70,8858

THB

Thai baht

39,010

BRL

Brazilian real

4,0034

MXN

Mexican peso

22,9938

INR

Indian rupee

78,7715

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6605

ROBERT V. FUNK,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

J. M. VANYUR, Warden; JAMES GILMORE, Attorney

General of the Commonwealth of Virginia,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge.

(CA-97-24-5-BR)

Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decided: August 25, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert V. Funk, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Funk

v. Vanyur, No. CA-97-24-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Apr. 4, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 193

Deploring individuals who deny the historical reality of the Holocaust and

commending the vital, ongoing work of the United States Holocaust

Memorial Museum.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 9, 1995

Mr. HATCH (for himself, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. D’AMATO, Mr. MURKOWSKI,

Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. PELL, Mr. SIMON, Mr. KOHL, Mr.

ABRAHAM, and Mr. MOYNIHAN) submitted the following resolution; which

was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Deploring individuals who deny the historical reality of the

Holocaust and commending the vital, ongoing work of

the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.

Whereas the Holocaust is a basic fact of history, the denial

of which is no less absurd than the denial of the occurrence of the Second World War;

Whereas the Holocaust—the systematic, state-sponsored

mass murders by Nazi Germany of 6,000,000 Jews,

alongside millions of others, in the name of a perverse racial theory—stands as one of the most ferociously heinous state acts the world has ever known; and
2

•SRES 193 ATS

Whereas those who promote the denial of the Holocaust do

so out of profound ignorance or for the purpose of furthering anti-Semitism and racism: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) deplores the persistent, ongoing and mali3 cious efforts by some persons in this country and

4 abroad to deny the historical reality of the Holo5 caust; and

6 (2) commends the vital, ongoing work of the

7 United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, which

8 memorializes the victims of the Holocaust and teach9 es all who are willing to learn profoundly compelling

10 and universally resonant moral lessons.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                          5,422,448
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                   2,274,717
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                8,090,562
<PP&E>                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 10,828,510
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           6,287,729
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                6
<OTHER-SE>                      3,397,251
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   10,828,510
<SALES>                         9,511,312
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                9,511,312
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  10,211,317
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                (65,511)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (496,748)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                     (496,748)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      (85.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0.000
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on February 2, 2022, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), R Consortium, Inc. (“R Consortium”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Swiss Re Management Ltd., Adliswil, Switzerland; American Statistical Association, Alexandria, VA; Lander Analytics, New York, NY; and Novo Nordisk A/S, Hovedstaden, Denmark, have been added as parties to this venture.                

Also, ThinkR, Aubervilliers, France, has withdrawn as a party to this venture.

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and R Consortium intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On September 15, 2015, R Consortium filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department                           ( print page 14046)                        of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on October 2, 2015 (80 FR 59815).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on November 9, 2021. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on December 22, 2021 (86 FR 72629).                

Suzanne Morris,

Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics Unit, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2022-05174 Filed 3-10-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Time-Sensitive Obesity PAR review.                    

*Date:*                         April 19, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         NIDDK/National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Michele L. Barnard, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer,  Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Room 7353, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-2542, (301) 594-8898,                         *barnardm@extra.niddk.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

 Dated: March 15, 2022.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-05772 Filed 3-17-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 4.1


 





INCORPORATED
IN DELAWARE 0 **00** IRONCLAD ENCRYPTION CORPORATION 500,000,000 Authorized shares PAR VALUE $0.001 Non-Assessable Cusip 46302E107
This Certifies that **specimen** is the record holder of **No** shares of Stock of IRONCLAD ENCRYPTION CORPORATION Transferable
only on the share register of the corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly
endorsed or assigned. This certificate and the shares represented hereby are issued and shall be held subject to all the provisions
of the Articles of Incorporation and the By-laws of the corporation and any amendments thereto. WITNESS the signatures of its
authorized officers this 20th day of October A.D. 2017 Counter Signature Columbia Stock Transfer Company, 1869 E, Seltice Way
Suite 292, Post Falls, ID 83854







 






     


    

  





For Value
Received, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto Shares represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute
and appoint Attorney to transfer the said Shares on the books of the within named Corporation with full power substitution in
the premises. NOTICE. THE SIGNATURE OF THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE.
IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. Signed Dated In the presence of
Hon. L, s, Johnsen, CoMissioner,

Department of Banking, Austin, Texas Opinion No,V-216
Re: The legality of a State Bank Charter amen&meat to chalye its domicile from

Dear Sir: one.cou~&y to anothera

Ton request our opinion in the rolhmiag
WArticle 4 Chapter III of the Texas @a&ing Code provides tkat the Axtiol&~ of Association ef a State Balllr *shall contain: 2, The city or :town ami the oounty of its dcmici10.~

"Article 12 Chapter III of MO Code prwides: #Subject to theprorisions of this Code, any State bank may amen4 its Articles ofAssooiation for aay lawfulpurposeGo 0 a 0 sprorided, however, i o y no ameabrsnt changiw tke d@micile of anJrstate bank to amother tit or town shallbe effectiveuntil approve

-the State Banking Board in the manner provided ior tha approval of an original applioatien for chartorn

*Since RB specificprovision is aa& under the above authority for a bank to move ita domicile fromwithin one couaty towithin anether county, we are hereby requestingyour opinion aa towhether a bank in 

### l men&ing its charter to change fts domicfle from one t0wn 1~ one county ts a city in another county is so tuaonding itsHon. L, S. Johnson - Page 2 (V-210)

charter *for a lawfulpurpose"provided it complieswith thatprovision requiring it to submit theAmendment to the State Banking Board for approval,"

Section 16 of Article m of the Constitution dealingwith State banks contains the following:

"Such body corporate shallnot be authorized to engage in business at more than one place which shallbe designated in its charter.* The "place" contemplatedby thisprovision means the town or citywherein the bank is to be established and operated,

The language quotedby you - "provided however O O O no amendment changing the domicile of any state bank to another city or town shallbe effective until approved by the State Banking Board in the manner provided for the approval of an originalapplication for charter" - undoubtedly implies that the domicile of any statebank may be changed to another city or town by the process of charter amendment. Suoh amendment, therefore,would be *for a lawfulpurpose" and there is nothing in the Code to limit the permissible removal to another place in the county of its originaldomfofle.

You are thereforeadvised that any state bank may amend its charter soas to move its dOmiCile from one ::ounty

to a town or city in another county, provided it complieswith the requirements of th2 Banking Codewith respect to submitting such amendment to the State Board for approval, "fn themanner provided for the approval of an original applioationfor oharter."

SUMMARY

A statebank may lawfullyremove its domicile from one county to'another town or city in another countyupon amending its charterproperly, and submittfng the same to the approval by the_.

**I** Hon. L. S. Johnson - Page 3 (V-216)

State Banking Board in the samemanner provided for the appkoral of an original applicatioa

## for charter. Art. 12, Chap. III of the State Banklag

## codeor Texas. Yours very truly, ATTOltlQtY(SENJ3RAL

OFTY!ZAS

0S:wb 

# BY

&&

Assistant

APPROVRB ILAY24, 1947
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Hector GAYTAN, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-50287 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed January 18, 2018

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Hector Gaytan, Pro Se

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Hector Gaytan has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011), Gaytan has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.