alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 16 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 16

    To make minority party appointments to Senate committees under 
      paragraph 2 of rule XXV for the One Hundred Fourth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Daschle submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    To make minority party appointments to Senate committees under 
      paragraph 2 of rule XXV for the One Hundred Fourth Congress.

    Resolved, That the following shall constitute the minority party's 
membership on the standing committees for the One Hundred Fourth 
Congress, or until their successors are chosen:
    Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry: Mr. Leahy, Mr. 
Pryor, Mr. Heflin, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Conrad, Mr. Daschle, Mr. Baucus, and 
Mr. Kerrey.
    Committee on Appropriations: Mr. Byrd, Mr. Inouye, Mr. Hollings, 
Mr. Johnston, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Bumpers, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Harkin, Ms. 
Mikulski, Mr. Reid, Mr. Kerrey, Mr. Kohl, and Mrs. Murray.
    Committee on Armed Services: Mr. Nunn, Mr. Exon, Mr. Levin, Mr. 
Kennedy, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Glenn, Mr. Byrd, Mr. Robb, Mr. Lieberman, 
and Mr. Bryan.
    Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs: Mr. Sarbanes, Mr. 
Dodd, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Bryan, Mrs. Boxer, Ms. Moseley-Braun, and Mrs. 
Murray.
    Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation: Mr. Hollings, 
Mr. Inouye, Mr. Ford, Mr. Exon, Mr. Rockefeller, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Breaux, 
Mr. Bryan, and Mr. Dorgan.
    Committee on Energy and Natural Resources: Mr. Johnston, Mr. 
Bumpers, Mr. Ford, Mr. Bradley, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Akaka, Mr. Wellstone, 
and Mr. Campbell.
    Committee on Environment and Public Works: Mr. Baucus, Mr. 
Moynihan, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Reid, Mr. Graham, Mr. Lieberman, and Mrs. 
Boxer.
    Committee on Finance: Mr. Moynihan, Mr. Baucus, Mr. Bradley, Mr. 
Pryor, Mr. Rockefeller, Mr. Breaux, Mr. Conrad, Mr. Graham, and Ms. 
Moseley-Braun.
    Committee on Foreign Relations: Mr. Pell, Mr. Biden, Mr. Sarbanes, 
Mr. Dodd, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Robb, Mr. Feingold, and Mrs. Feinstein.
    Committee on Governmental Affairs: Mr. Glenn, Mr. Nunn, Mr. Levin, 
Mr. Pryor, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Akaka, and Mr. Dorgan.
    Committee on the Judiciary: Mr. Biden, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Leahy, Mr. 
Heflin, Mr. Simon, Mr. Kohl, Mrs. Feinstein, and Mr. Feingold.
    Committee on Labor and Human Resources: Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Pell, Mr. 
Dodd, Mr. Simon, Mr. Harkin, Ms. Mikulski, and Mr. Wellstone.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

DARYL PROVANCE, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 96 WAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 23rd day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6695

JOHN THOMAS LEWIS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. KAREN BROWN , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. ( 1:16

- cv - 00639

- CMH

- TCB )

Submitted : October 31, 2017 Decided: November 9, 2017

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. John Thomas Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Haeberle Cahill, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: John Thomas Lewis seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 2 8 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfi es this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (200 3). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U. S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lewis has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal c ontentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit
32.0





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADDED BY


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
Delanco Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Report”), the undersigned hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  
         The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and





2.   
        The information contained in
this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
period covered by this Report.





By:
                /s/ James E. IgoJames
      E. Igo.Chairman,
      President and Chief ExecutiveOfficerJune
      23, 2010By:
                /s/ Eva ModiEva
      ModiChief
      Financial OfficerJune
      23, 2010
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 

FORM OF FISERV, INC. 

AMENDMENT TO STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT 
 This
Amendment revises your Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement(s) (“Option Agreements”) by replacing Section 6(b) in its entirety with the following: 
  

	 	6.	Termination of Directorship. 

 . . . 

 

	 	(b)	Deadline for Exercise. 

  

	 	(i)	If you cease to be a Director for any reason other than for Cause, you are (or in the event your cessation is by reason of your death or Disability resulting in judicial appointment of a guardian ad litem, administrator
or other legal representative, the executor or administrator of your estate, any person who shall have acquired the Option through bequest or inheritance or such guardian ad litem, administrator or other legal representative is) entitled to exercise
the Option per the terms contained herein prior to up to the five year anniversary of your cessation of service as a Director. 

  

	 	(ii)	If you die within the exercise period described in subsection (i) above, your executor, the administrator of your estate or your beneficiary may exercise the Option prior to the later of (A) up to one year
after the date of your death or (B) up to five years following your cessation of service as a Director. 

 This amendment shall be
effective as of November             , 2017. All other terms and conditions set forth in your Option Agreements remain in full force and effect without change. 

 

			
	FISERV, INC.
		
	By	 	 
	Name:	 	
	Title:	 	

  

			
	Agreed and Acknowledged by Participant:
	
	 
	Print Name
	
	 
	Signature
#### Sundari K. PRASAD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Unknown Agent; DEA, Unknown Agent; DEA, Unknown Agent; FBI Richmond, Unknown Agent; FBI Headquarters, Unknown Agent; State of Virginia, Unknown Agent; Roderick Young, U.S. Eastern District Court—Richmond Division; M. H. Lauck, U.S. Eastern District Court—Richmond Division, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-7460

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 30, 2018

Decided: February 2, 2018

Sundari K. Prasad, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sundari K. Prasad seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action for failure to comply with the court’s prior order to particularize her complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 545-47, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). Because the deficiencies identified by the district court may be remedied by particularizing the complaint as directed, we conclude that the order Prasad seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. *Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc.,*807 F.3d 619, 623-24 (4th Cir. 2015); *Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392,*10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*

*

 We do not remand this matter to the district court, though, because the court previously afforded Prasad the chance to particularize her complaint, and she failed to do so. *Cf. Goode,*807 F.3d at 629-30.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

Theundersigned executive officer of First Federal Bancshares of Arkansas, Inc.(the “Registrant”) hereby certifies that the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for thethree and six months ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|                     |   | /s/ Larry J. Brandt                      |
|---------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|
| Date: July 25, 2006 |   | Larry J. Brandt  Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

                                                                                        

----
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 39

Authorizing expenditures by the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 11 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 1995

Mr. MURKOWSKI, from the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, reported the following original resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

RESOLUTION

Authorizing expenditures by the Committee on Energy and

Natural Resources.

1 Resolved, That, in carrying out its powers, duties, and

2 functions under the Standing Rules of the Senate, in ac3 cordance with its jurisdiction under rule XXV of such

4 rules, including holding hearings, reporting such hearings,

5 and making investigations as authorized by paragraphs 1

6 and 8 of rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of the Senate,

7 the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources is au8 thorized from March 1, 1995, through February 29, 1996,

9 and March 1, 1996, through February 28, 1997, in its

10 discretion (1) to make expenditures from the contingent
2

SRES 39 RS

1 fund of the Senate, (2) to employ personnel, and (3) with

2 the prior consent of the Government department or agency

3 concerned and the Committee on Rules and Administra4 tion, to use on a reimbursable or non-reimbursable basis

5 the services of personnel of any such department or agen6 cy.

7 SEC. 2. The expenses of the committee for the period

8 March 1, 1995, through February 29, 1996, under this

9 resolution shall not exceed $2,678,348.

10 (b) For the period March 1, 1996, through February

11 28, 1997, expenses of the committee under this resolution

12 shall not exceed $2,739,487.

13 SEC. 3. The committee shall report its findings, to14 gether with such recommendations for legislation as it

15 deems advisable, to the Senate at the earliest practicable

16 date, but not later than February 29, 1996, and February

17 28, 1997, respectively.

18 SEC. 4. Expenses of the committee under this resolu19 tion shall be paid from the contingent fund of the Senate

20 upon vouchers approved by the chairman of the commit21 tee, except that vouchers shall not be required (1) for the

22 disbursement of salaries of employees paid at an annual

23 rate, or (2) for the payment of telecommunications pro24 vided by the Office of the Sergeant at Arms and Door25 keeper, United States Senate, or (3) for the payment of
3

SRES 39 RS

1 stationery supplies purchased through the Keeper of the

2 Stationery, United States Senate, or (4) for payments to

3 the Postmaster, United States Senate, or (5) for the pay4 ment of metered charges on copying equipment provided

5 by the Office of the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper,

6 United States Senate, or (6) for the payment of Senate

7 Recording and Photographic Services.

8 SEC. 5. There are authorized such sums as may be

9 necessary for agency contributions related to the com10 pensation of employees of the committee from March 1,

11 1995, through February 29, 1996, and March 1, 1996,

12 through February 28, 1997, to be paid from the Appro13 priations account for ‘‘Expenses of Inquiries and Inves14 tigations’’.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 59 (Monday, March 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17310-17311]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06375]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Initial Review 
Group Career Development for Established Investigators and 
Conference Grants Study Section.
    Date: June 9-10, 2022.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Greg Bissonette, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review

[[Page 17311]]

Branch, National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway 
Building, Suite 2W200, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-1622, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#31535842425e5f544545545653715c50585d1f5f58591f565e47"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="187a716b6b77767d6c6c7d7f7a587579717436767170367f776e">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 22, 2022.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-06375 Filed 3-25-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
David Lax <Lax@api.org>

10/24/2013 05:38 PM

To Group A-AND-R-DOCKET@EPA

cc

bcc

Subject Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0135: Supplemental 

Comments of the American Petroleum Institute

1 attachment

API Response Response to MECA Supplemental Supplemental Tier 3 Comments.pd Comments.pdf

To whom it may concern:

The American Petroleum Institute is submitting the attached supplemental comments to the subject

Docket for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Proposed Rule on Control of Air Pollution from

Motor Vehicles: Tier 3 Motor Vehicle Emission and Fuel Standards.

Sincerely,

David H. Lax

Tel: (202) 682-8479 

Fax: (202) 682-8031

email: lax@api.org
#### REVEAL ENERGY SERVICES, INCORPORATED; Statoil Gulf Services, L.L.C., Plaintiffs-Appellees v. Matthew A. DAWSON; Jin Z. Dawson; Axiom Genesis, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellants

No. 17-20568

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 13, 2017

Edward F. Fernandes, Attorney, Hun-ton *&*Williams, L.L.P., Austin, TX, Ryan A. Shores, Esq,, William Jonathan Haun, Esq., Shearman *&*Sterling, L.L.P., Washington, DC, Charles Daniel Ossola, Esq., Litigation Counsel, Daniel George Vivarel-li, Jr., Esq., Hunton & Williams, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for Plamtiffs-Appellees

Ashish Mahendru, Mahendru, P.C., Houston, TX, for Defendants-Appellants

Before Judges SMITH, BARKSDALE, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM; *

Dr. Matthew A. Dawson, his wife Dr. Jin Z. Dawson, and Axiom Genesis, Incorporated, challenge the preliminary injunction provided by the district court’s 21 August 2017 order. Having reviewed the briefs *191and pertinent parts of the record, and heard oral argument, the preliminary injunction is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R, 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir, R, 47,5.4.
----

(2004/C 84 E/0709)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0576/04

by Philip Claeys (Nl) to the Commission

(26 February 2004)

Subject:   Electioneering activities of Romano Prodi

Four left-wing parties are due to contest the European elections in Italy jointly under the ‘Prodi List’. Press reports suggest that the President of the Commission will not be standing himself on this list but will be playing an active part in the election campaign. He is reportedly involved in the selection of candidates. It would in fact be unlikely that the President of the Commission would lend his name to the list without being closely involved in the whole campaign.

Although these new party political activities will undoubtedly take up a great deal of his time, the Commission President has stated that he will remain in office until October.

Does Mr Prodi regard the office of President of the European Commission as a full-time job?

How much time does he think he will be spending each week on the election campaign in Italy?

Does the Commission consider it desirable for its members to be actively involved in election campaigns?

What arrangements have been made within the Commission? Who will take over Mr Prodi's duties in his absence?

Answer given by Mr Prodi on behalf of the Commission

(2 April 2004)

As the Commission has pointed out on a number of occasions in response to written and oral questions from MEPs, the Members of the Commission are politicians exercising a political function and, provided that they perform the duties incumbent, they remain free to express their personal views quite independently and on their own responsibility, as well as to be a member of a political party.

This having been made clear, Mr Prodi has confirmed that he does not intend to stand as a candidate in the election or take an active part in the election campaign. As in the past, he will continue to devote all his energy to his responsibilities as President of the Commission until the end of his term of office.

----
Exhibit 4.4

 

	
Number
   B-
    	
 
    	
Incorporated Under the   Laws of the State of Alaska
    	
 
    	
Shares
   -0-
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Cusip No.
    


 

GCI LIBERTY, INC.

 

Class B Common Stock, no par value

 

Specimen Certificate

 

This Certifies that [          ]  is the owner of [          ] FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF CLASS B COMMON STOCK, NO PAR VALUE, OF GCI LIBERTY, INC. (hereinafter called the “Corporation”) transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of the Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.

 

Witness, the seal of the Corporation and the signatures of its duly authorized officers.

 

Dated:

 

GCI Liberty, Inc.

 

[Corporate Seal]

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
President
    	
 
    	
Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 57 (Thursday, March 24, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 16819]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06219]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 06/06-0349]


Main Street Capital III, L.P.; Notice Seeking Exemption Under 
Section 312 of the Small Business Investment Act, Conflicts of Interest

    Notice is hereby given that Main Street Capital III, L.P., 1300 
Post Oak Blvd., Suite 800, Houston, TX 77056, a Federal Licensee under 
the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (the ``Act''), in 
connection with a financing involving small concern NuStep, LLC located 
at 511 Venture Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48108, provided notice of this 
transaction to the Small Business Administration (``SBA'') pursuant to 
the Regulations found at 13 CFR 107.730--13 CFR 107.730--Financings 
which constitute conflicts of interests. NuStep, LLC is an Associate of 
Main Street Capital III, L.P. because Associate Main Street Equity 
Investment, Inc. owns a greater than ten percent interest in the 
NuStep, LLC.
    This financing is pursuant to Sec.  107.730(f) of the Regulations 
because Main Street Capital III, L.P.'s parent corporation, Main Street 
Capital Corporation, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 
1940 and received an exemption from the Securities and Exchange 
Commission for the transaction and fulfilled its requirement to notify 
SBA.
    Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit 
written comments on the transaction within fifteen days of the date of 
this publication, to the Associate Administrator, Office of Investment 
and Innovation, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street 
SW, Washington, DC 20416.

U.S. Small Business Administration.
Bailey DeVries,
Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation.
[FR Doc. 2022-06219 Filed 3-23-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P