alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Coffee      Holding Co., Inc.**

**Computation      of Per Share Earnings**

**(Unaudited)**

|                                                                              |   | **Quarters Ended****January 31,** |          |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|---------------|
|                                                                              |   | **2008**                                    |          | 2007 |   |
|                                                                              |   | **(unaudited)**                             |          | (unaudited) |   |
|                                                                              |   |                                        |          |   |   |
| Net                Income                                                         |   | **$**                                       | **182,265**   |   | $ | 309,684 |   |
|                                                                              |   |                                        |          |   |   |   |   |
| **BASIC                EARNINGS:**                                                |   |                                        |          |   |   |   |   |
| Weighted                average number of common shares outstanding               |   |                                        | **5,506,326** |   |   | 5,529,830 |   |
|                                                                              |   |                                        |          |   |   |   |   |
| Basic                earnings per common share                                    |   | **$**                                       | **0.03**      |   | $ | 0.06 |   |
|                                                                              |   |                                        |          |   |   |   |   |
| **DILUTED                EARNINGS:**                                              |   |                                        |          |   |   |   |   |
| Weighted                average number of common shares outstanding               |   |                                        | **5,506,326** |   |   | 5,529,830 |   |
| Warrants                - common stock equivalents                                |   |                                        | **70,000**    |   |   | 70,000 |   |
| Weighted                average number of common shares outstanding - as adjusted |   |                                        | **5,576,326** |   |   | 5,599,830 |   |
|                                                                              |   |                                        |          |   |   |   |   |
| Diluted                earnings per common share                                  |   | **$**                                       | **0.03**      |   | $ | 0.06 |   |

----
**Exhibit      32.1**

|  Signed                on this 21st                day of August, 2007 |  By:                /s/ Tony Tong                                                     |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                        | Name:                Tony Tong                                                             |
|                                                                        | Title:                Chief Executive Officer                                              |
|                                                                        | (Principal                Executive Officer )                                              |
|                                                                        |                                                                                       |
|  Signed                on this 21st                day of August, 2007 |  By:                /s/ Daniel Lui                                                    |
|                                                                        | Name:                Daniel Lui                                                            |
|                                                                        | Title:                Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial                Officer) |
Exhibit 4.64


 


 


 


James Noble


 


10th April 2017


 


Dear James,


 


Fee increase


 


I am pleased to confirm that with effect from
the 1st January 2017 your fees have been increased to $92,000 per annum.


 


All other terms and conditions of your appointment remain unchanged.


 


If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me.


 


	Yours Sincerely	 
	 	 
	/s/ Adam George	 
	Adam George	 
	Company Secretary	 




 


GW Pharmaceuticals plc Sovereign House, Vision
Park, Histon, Cambridge, CB24 9BZ


Telephone: +44 (0)1223 266800 www.gwpharm.com
Order entered November 10, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00533-CR

RAMIRO PAYAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F09-72851-Y

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and 

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether 

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the 

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which 

may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nicole KISSANE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-50019

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed December 21, 2017

Ajay Krishnamurthy, Helen H. Hong, Assistant U.S. Attorney, John Parmley, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Joseph S. Smith, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the US Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

John Charles Ellis, Jr., Sarah Rose Weinman, Attorney, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant

Before; WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is ■ suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*353MEMORANDUM **

Nicole Kissane appeals the 21-month sentence imposed following her guilty plea to conspiracy to violate the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 43. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Kissane contends that the distinct court procedurally erred in imposing the sentence because it relied on clearly erroneous facts, and did not consider or address her arguments regarding sentencing disparity. We review for plain error, *see United States v. Rangel,*697 F.3d 795, 800 (9th Cir. 2012), and conclude that there is none. Contrary to Kissane’s argument, the district court’s factual findings were not clearly erroneous. The court did not treat her mitigating circumstances as aggravating, but rather concluded that they did not justify the below-Guidelines sentence that Kissane requested. Moreover, the court expressly considered Kissane’s sentencing disparity arguments, as well as the other mitigating circumstances she presented, and adequately explained the sentence. *See United States v. Carty,*520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). The court was not required to compare Kis-sane’s sentence to sentences imposed in unrelated cases. *See United States v. Treadwell,*593 F.3d 990, 1011-12 (9th Cir. 2010).

Kissane also contends that her sentence is substantively unreasonable. We review for abuse of discretion. *See Carty,*520 F.3d at 993. Given the deference due to a district court’s sentencing determination and in light of the totality of the circumstances, the within-Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable. *See Carty,*520 F.3d at 995.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**Exhibit 10.1**

 

 

 

September 20, 2004

 

Laird Cagan

Chairman

Natural Gas Systems, Inc.

By email: laird@cmcp.com

 

Re:                               LetterAgreement to Amend the Terms of the Promissory Note Dated August 10, 2004

 

Dear Laird,

 

This letter is to evidence our agreement tomodify the terms of the secured promissory note dated August 10, 2004 in theamount of $475,000 (the “Note”).

 

1.                                       Maturity.  The Maturity Date shall remain February 10,2005, provided that in the event that the financial advisor/agent of theCompany fails to secure at least $1 million of equity gross funding afterAugust 10, 2004, then the Maturity Date shall be extended until the earlier ofJuly 1, 2005 or the date on which the minimum equity gross funding after August10, 2004 reaches $1 million.

 

2(b)                           MandatoryPrepayment.  The Parties agree thatMandatory Prepayments shall begin only after the Company has received at least$500,000 of equity gross fundings after August 10, 2004.  At such point, the Mandatory PrepaymentAmount shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the incremental equity netfundings.  After February 10, 2005, theMandatory Prepayment Amount shall be increased by an amount equal to fiftypercent (50%) of the sum of net revenues less direct Tullos operating expensesand capital expenditures.

 

All other terms and conditions remain in fullforce and effect.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executedthis Amendment as of the date above written.

 
|   | Natural Gas Systems, Inc |                 |
|--------|--------------------------|----------------------|
|   |                     |                 |   |
|   | By:                      | /s/ Robert S. Herlin |   |   |
|   |                     | President & CEO  |   |
|        |                          |                      |  |  |

 

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED this 20thday of September, 2004.

 

 

 

/s/ Laird Q. Cagan
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Michael J. Antonoplos, Chief Executive Officer of Biofield Corp. and I, Joseph Repko, Chief Financial Officer of Biofield Corp. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





| | Date: November 19, 2007 | By: /s/ Michael J. Antonoplos 
                    Michael J. Antonopolos
                    (Chief Executive Officer)
| | ----------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Date: November 19, 2007 | By: /s/ Joseph Repko Joseph Repko
               (Chief Financial Officer)
#### William Anthony TACCINO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-1584

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: September 18, 2017

Decided: November 13, 2017

William A. Taccino, Appellant Pro Se. Gabriel Robert Deadwyler, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William A. Taccino appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting defendant’s motion to dismiss his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Taccino v. Comm’r, Soc. Sec.,*No. 1:16-cv-02775-JFM (D. Md. Mar. 30, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
|WELLS FARGO(logo) | Commercial Mortgage ServicingD1050-084, 8th Floor401 South Tryon St.Charlotte, NC 282021-800-326-1334
|----------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby made
to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES,
INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as General
Special Servicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Master Servicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Special Servicer, PENTALPHA
SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator
and as Custodian, and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates Series 2014-C22 (the “Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the
meanings assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement,
I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the
General Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018, (the “Reporting Period”),
and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based
on such review, the General Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects
throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed
this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.



|/s/ Leslie Hayton | 
|----------------- | 



Leslie Hayton

Managing Director

Wells
Fargo Bank



|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Together we’ll go far
|---------------------- | ---------------------
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jimmy GORDON, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-10312 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed January 26, 2018

Leigha Amy Simonton, James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Peter Michael Fleury, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jimmy Gordon appeals his guilty plea conviction for sexual exploitation of a minor in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). Gordon argues that the conduct described in the factual resume supporting his guilty plea was not sufficient to establish the offense of conviction because it did not reflect that a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct.

Because Gordon did not object to the factual sufficiency of the factual resume in the district court, review is for plain error. *See United States v. McCall,*833 F.3d 560, 562 (5th Cir. 2016); *United States v. Trejo,*610 F.3d 308, 313 (5th Cir. 2010). Courts employ a six-factor test to determine whether an image depicts sexually explicit conduct. *See United States v. Steen,*634 F.3d 822, 826 (5th Cir. 2011). A review of those factors in light of the stipulations in the written factual resume, Gordon’s admissions at his rearraignment, and the record as a whole, *see Trejo,*610 F.3d at 313, shows that the district committed no clear or obvious error in finding a sufficient factual basis for Gordon’s guilty plea. Specifically, the record supports a conclusion that the focal point of the image in question was the child’s uncovered genitalia and that the image was created to be sent to a third party to elicit a sexual response from the viewer. *See McCall,*833 F.3d at *317563-64. Gordon’s argument that the factual resume was insufficient because it did not reflect that the minor actively engaged in the sexually explicit conduct is without merit. *See id.*at 563 n.4, 564 n.6.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 292 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 292

Calling for an end to the recent conflict between Eritrea and Ethiopia, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 19, 1998

Mr. Campbell (for himself, Mr. Payne, Mr. Hastings of Florida, and Mr. 
   Chabot) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
          referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Calling for an end to the recent conflict between Eritrea and Ethiopia, 
                        and for other purposes.

Whereas the 1991 ouster of the Mengistu dictatorship led to relative peace and 
        stability in Eritrea and Ethiopia;
Whereas in 1993 Eritrea became independent after an internationally supervised 
        referendum and the Government of Ethiopia accepted the result of the 
        referendum;
Whereas the Governments of Eritrea and Ethiopia have worked closely on a wide 
        range of issues over the past several years;
Whereas the Governments of Eritrea and Ethiopia enjoy warm relations with the 
        United States;
Whereas on May 6, 1998, a military confrontation erupted between Eritrea and 
        Ethiopia, resulting in the deaths of hundreds of innocent civilians and 
        the displacement of tens of thousands of people;
Whereas the peoples of Eritrea and Ethiopia have suffered for decades due to war 
        and manmade famines and do not deserve once again to suffer due to armed 
        conflict;
Whereas the conflict between Eritrea and Ethiopia could destabilize the entire 
        subregion and lead to a massive humanitarian crisis;
Whereas the Governments of Eritrea and Ethiopia have both stated that they are 
        committed to a peaceful resolution of the conflict; and
Whereas the Governments of the United States and Rwanda have been actively 
        engaged in facilitation efforts to resolve the crisis: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) calls on both Eritrea and Ethiopia to declare a cease-
        fire immediately and bring an end to the violence between the 
        two countries;
            (2) commends the executive branch of the United States 
        Government for brokering a moratorium on air raids between 
        Eritrea and Ethiopia;
            (3) commends the recent efforts of the United States 
        facilitation team to resolve the crisis, and encourages 
        continued United States engagement toward a peaceful resolution 
        of the conflict; and
            (4) calls on President Isaias Afewerki and Prime Minister 
        Meles Zenawi to end the conflict peacefully before it escalates 
        into a full-scale war.
                                 <all>
```
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 09504**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  09504_ HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 09504_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09504_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 09504_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09504_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09504_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09504_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09504_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09504_D-1 Block Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09504_D-2 Block Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09504_D-3 Block Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09504_Map 1_Arm station aerial.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 09504_Map 2_Arm disposal sites aerial.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 09504_Map 3_Arm station topo.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09504_Map 4_ Arm diposal site topo_active.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09504_Map 5_Arm disposal site topo_closed.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09504_Map 6_Arm outfalls.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09504_WB-1 Arm flow diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09504\09504_Certificate Statement.pdf Plant certification statement 09504\09504_Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.