alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 263 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con. Res.263
                                          Agreed to May 13, 1998        

                       One Hundred Fifth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  eight

                          Concurrent Resolution

 

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL PEACE OFFICERS' MEMORIAL 
              SERVICE.

    The National Fraternal Order of Police and its auxiliary shall be 
permitted to sponsor a public event, the seventeenth annual National 
Peace Officers' Memorial Service, on the Capitol Grounds on May 15, 
1998, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the 
Senate may jointly designate, in order to honor the more than 160 law 
enforcement officers who died in the line of duty during 1997.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--The event authorized to be conducted on the 
Capitol Grounds under section 1 shall be free of admission charge to 
the public and arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress, 
under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol and 
the Capitol Police Board.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The National Fraternal Order of 
Police and its auxiliary shall assume full responsibility for all 
expenses and liabilities incident to all activities associated with the 
event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    (a) Structures and Equipment.--Subject to the approval of the 
Architect of the Capitol, the National Fraternal Order of Police and 
its auxiliary are authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such 
stage, sound amplification devices, and other related structures and 
equipment, as may be required for the event authorized to be conducted 
on the Capitol Grounds under section 1.
    (b) Additional Arrangements.--The Architect of the Capitol and the 
Capitol Police Board are authorized to make any such additional 
arrangements as may be required to carry out the event.

SEC. 4. APPLICABILITY OF PROHIBITIONS.

    Nothing in this resolution may be construed to waive the 
applicability of the prohibitions established by section 4 of the Act 
of July 31, 1946 (40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, 
displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 81 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 81

Commending Robert D. Reischauer for his service to the Congress and the 
                                Nation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            February 27 (legislative day, February 22), 1995

    Mr. Domenici (for himself, Mr. Exon, Mr. Dole, Mr. Daschle, Mr. 
 Grassley, Mr. Nickles, Mr. Gramm, Mr. Bond, Mr. Lott, Mr. Brown, Mr. 
Gorton, Mr. Gregg, Ms. Snowe, Mr. Abraham, Mr. Frist, Mr. Hollings, Mr. 
    Johnston, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Simon, Mr. Conrad, Mr. Dodd, Mr. 
  Sarbanes, Mrs. Boxer, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Hatfield, and Mr. Packwood), 
 submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Commending Robert D. Reischauer for his service to the Congress and the 
                                Nation.

Whereas Dr. Robert D. Reischauer served as Director of the Congressional Budget 
        Office from March 6, 1989 to February 28, 1995;
Whereas he previously served in that office in its formative years from February 
        28, 1975 to April 1, 1981 as a Special Assistant, Assistant Director, 
        and Deputy Director;
Whereas he has ably and faithfully performed the difficult duties of the 
        Director's office serving all Members of the Congress with great 
        professional integrity and dedication;
Whereas he has maintained the high tradition of that office by providing 
        critical analysis and review of complex fiscal policy issues pending 
        before the Congress;
Whereas he has provided the Congress and the American public with analysis of 
        these complex fiscal policy issues with candor, objectivity, and 
        clarity;
Whereas he has performed the duties of his office with remarkable diligence, 
        perseverance, and intelligence often at great sacrifice to his personal 
        life; and
Whereas he has earned the respect, affection, and esteem of the United States 
        Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate of the United States commends Robert D. 
Reischauer for his long, faithful, and exemplary service to his country 
and to the Senate.
                                 <all>
```
#### FENGDI LIU, Petitioner v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. Attorney General, Respondent

No. 17-60064 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 15, 2017

Donglai Yang, Law Office of Donglai Yang, New Orleans, LA, for Petitioner

Melissa Katherine Lott, Lori Buff War-lick, Trial Attorneys, Office of Immigration Litigation, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/OIL, Washington, DC, for Respondent

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Fengdi Liu petitions for review. of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). The BIA adopted and affirmed the immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of relief from removal, including Liu’s applications for asylum and withholding of removal.

*217Liu’s brief, through counsel Donglai Yang, is virtually identical to the brief he filed with the BIA. The brief devotes less than two pages to his argument, advances conclusory assertions, and provides no record citations. Moreover, while his list of authorities denotes five cases, none of those cases are cited in the body of the brief. Because Liu’s brief has not meaningfully challenged the BIA’s reasons for upholding the IJ’s denial of asylum and withholding of removal, Liu has effectively waived any challenge to the BIA’s decision. *United States v. Scroggins,*599 F.3d 433, 446-47 (5th Cir. 2010); Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(8)(A). Therefore, the petition for review is DENIED.

This is not the first time we have rejected claims brought by counsel for failure to adequately brief. *See Yang v. Sessions,*697 Fed.Appx. 369 (5th Cir. 2017); *Poscual-Jimenez v. Sessions,*678 Fed.Appx. 191, 192 (5th Cir. 2017). Moreover, in *Yang,*we warned counsel that we would impose sanctions for future frivolous filings. *See Yang,*697 Fed.Appx. at 370 (citing *Macklin v. City of New Orleans,*293 F.3d 237, 241 (5th Cir. 2002) and *Carmon v. Lubrizol Corp.,*17 F.3d 791, 795 (5th Cir. 1994)).

Although the instant brief was filed before this court’s sanction warning in *Yang,*counsel did not move to withdraw or amend the instant brief after receiving the warning. Further, counsel did not file a reply brief addressing the Government’s argument that his brief is deficient. Given those omissions, within 30 days of the date of this opinion, counsel is ORDERED to show cause why he should not be sanctioned. *Cf. Perez-Lopez v. Holder,*408 Fed. Appx. 854, 855-56 (5th Cir. 2011). Moreover, because counsel represents other petitioners in immigration cases before this court, counsel is further ORDERED, within 30 days of the date of this opinion, to review all filings currently pending before this court to ensure that they are in compliance with Rule 28. Counsel is again WARNED that any future frivolous or noncompliant filings will result in sanctions.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cíe. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Loral
Space & Communications Ltd. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Richard J. Townsend, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the
    requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ RICHARD J. TOWNSEND
| |                        
| | Richard J. Townsend    
| | Chief Financial Officer

August 5, 2004
<PAGE>

                     CONSENT OF T.J. SMITH & COMPANY, INC.

  We hereby consent to the use of our report dated February 13, 2002 regarding
Torch Energy Royalty Trust and to the reference to our firm included in this
Form 10-K.


                                  T.J. SMITH & COMPANY, INC.


                                  By:  /s/ T. J.  Smith
                                      -----------------


Houston, Texas
March 25, 2002
#### UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Michael A. SHEEHAN Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-2197

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: January 26, 2018

Filed: February 14, 2018

Josephine M. Larison, Special Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Springfield, MO, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Michael A. Sheehan, Pro Se

Before BENTON, MURPHY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.

*369PER CURIAM.

Michael Sheehan directly appeals after he pled guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, and the district court1 sentenced him as an armed career criminal. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief under An-ders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), questioning the reasonableness of Sheehan’s sentence, but conceding that an appeal waiver in the plea agreement is applicable.

We conclude that the appeal waiver is enforceable. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo review of validity and applicability of appeal waiver). Sheehan concedes that he entered into the plea agreement and the appeal waiver knowingly and voluntarily, the arguments on appeal fall within the scope of the waiver, and no miscarriage of justice would result from enforcing the waiver. See United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc). In addition, having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no non-frivolous issues for appeal outside the scope of the waiver. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we dismiss this appeal.

1

. The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, David M Long, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer, of Biofield Corp.
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-SSB of the Company for the quarter
         ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Date: August 15, 2005                  By: /s/ DAVID M. LONG
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           David M. Long, Jr., M.D., Ph.D.
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)

                                       26
211(b) Toxicology Research Group Gasoline TBA VC:

Immunotoxicity

Reviewer Checklist 

Comments Action/Response Page

EPA

No comments p. 1264

Peer Reviewer – Schlesinger

No comments Noted.

Peer Reviewer – Goldsworthy

 This study evaluated the potential of 4 weeks of 

exposure to G-TBA to affect the humoral immune 

component of the immune system. This study was 

properly conducted and scientifically sound. Data 

demonstrated that G-TBA did not effect terminal body 

weights or spleen and thymus weights. G-TBA did not 

alter the spleen IgM antibody-forming cell response to 

sheep erythrocytes. The positive control CPS 

demonstrated the anticipated results, verifying the 

proper assay conditions. The conclusions that, under 

the experimental conditions of this study, G-TBA did 

not adversely affect the functional ability of the 

humoral immune component of the immune system 

accurately reflect the study results.

Noted.

211(b) Research Group Reviewer

No comments Noted.

211(b) Research Group QA/QC Reviewer

1. Satellite Report, Immunological 

Evaluation: GLP Compliance Statement 

needs to include the appropriate GLP 

reference and the statement about the 

positive control article stability, identity, 

purity, uniformity and concentration not 

being performed or being taken from the 

certificate of analysis (as was previously 

indicated).

Completed. Ok

2. Satellite Report, Immunological 

Evaluation: Page 3 of 24, This is the 

Immunotox QA Statement, not the HLS 

QA Statement as it indicates on the 

bottom of the page. 

Completed. Ok

3. Satellite Report, Immunological 

Evaluation: Somewhere in the text it 

should be indicated that the individual 

animal data are rounded and that original 

(unrounded) data were used for mean and 

standard error calculations. 

Completed on page 13. Ok
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Friday, May 16, 2014 5:17 PM 

To: Wayland, Robertj 

Cc: Culligan, Kevin; Elman, Barry 

Subject: One additional comment on RIN 2060-AR33 

Hi Bob, 

I wanted to share with you an additional interagency comment we’ve received: 

Addition of A More Stringent Option. Drawing on the abatement opportunities highlighted in prior 

comments, EPA should explicitly consider in the preamble another alternative BSER option, in 

addition to the proposed option 1 and option 2. This third option would be more stringent than the 

others, and, together with the others, would provide a more complete range of options for public 

comment. Commenters recognize that these options will differ in their energy system and 

economic implications and could provide technical information related to their evaluation and 

assessment. 

Regards, 

Cortney
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 282

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 2, 1998

Received and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To correct the enrollment of H.R. 2400.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 2400

3 the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make the

4 following corrections:
2

HCON 282 RFS

1 (1) In the table contained in section 1602 of

2 the bill—

3 (A) strike item 166, relating to Macomb

4 County, Michigan, and insert the following:

No. State Project description [Dollars in

Millions]

166. Michigan ........... Improvements to Tenth Street (Port Huron) ................... 1.8;

5 (B) after item 1850 insert the following:

No. State Project description [Dollars in

Millions]

1851. Michigan ........... Bridge-to-Bay bike path, St. Clair County ....................... 0.450;

6 (C) in item 755, relating to Cross Seminole

7 Trail, Florida, strike ‘‘1.25’’ and insert ‘‘1.5’’;

8 (D) in item 902, relating to St. Johns

9 River Bridge, Florida, strike ‘‘10.5’’ and insert

10 ‘‘14.0’’

11 (E) by striking item 242, relating to mag12 netic lane marking for I–4, Florida, and item

13 1065, relating to US 1792 in Volusia County,

14 Florida;

15 (F) in item 702, relating to I–4 in Or16 lando, Florida, by striking ‘‘10.5’’ and insert

17 ‘‘10.0’’;

18 (G) in item 770, relating to US–17/92 in

19 Volusia County, Florida, striking ‘‘1.35’’ and

20 insert ‘‘1.0’’;
3

HCON 282 RFS

1 (H) in item 789, relating to construction

2 of interchange, Orange County, Florida, strike

3 ‘‘2.0625’’ and insert ‘‘1.0’’;

4 (I) in item 635, relating to Florida Na5 tional Scenic Trail, strike ‘‘1.875’’ and insert

6 ‘‘2.15’’; and

7 (J) in item 1383, relating to improvements

8 to Alden Road, Florida, strike ‘‘0.525’’ and in9 sert ‘‘0.35’’; and

10 (2) On page 1A–71, line 22, insert after system

11 ‘‘$10,000,000 of such amounts shall be available to

12 the state of Alabama for fiscal years 1999 and

13 2000’’; and

14 (3) On page 1B–129, after line 10, insert the

15 following new subsections and redesignate succeed16 ing subsections accordingly:

17 ‘‘(g)(1) The Secretary shall provide $10 million for

18 construction of Highway 323 between Alzada and the vi19 cinity of Ekalaka, Montana.

20 ‘‘(2) Funds authorized by this subsection shall be

21 available for obligation in the same manner as if such

22 funds had been apportioned under chapter 1 of title 23,

23 United States Code.
4

HCON 282 RFS

1 ‘‘(h)(1) The Secretary shall provide $1.125 million

2 for construction of Third Street North, CSAH 81, Waite

3 Park.

4 ‘‘(2) Funds authorized by this subsection shall be

5 available for obligation in the same manner as if such

6 funds had been apportioned under chapter 1 of title 23,

7 United States Code.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 22, 1998.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-2200

___________ Timothy Edward Holz,, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Gary Grimes, * * * Appellee. * *

----------------- * * Timothy Edward Holz, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Western Arkansas. Gary Grimes, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * *

----------------- * * Timothy Edward Holz * * Appellant, * * v. * * Gary Grimes; Officer Hammond, * Sebastian County Detention * Center Deputy; Officer Cox, * Sebastian County Detention * Center Deputy, * * Appellees. *

### The Honorable Beverly R. Stites, United State Magistrat e 1 

### Judge fo r the Western District of Arkansas, to whom the case wa s referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). -2- ___________ Submitted: April 23, 1997 Filed: April 30, 1997

___________ Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________
PER CURIAM. Timothy Edward Holz, an Arkansas inmate, appeals the distric t court 's judgment in favor of defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action s

1 follo winga bench trial. Having carefully reviewed the record and th e parties' briefs, we conclude the district court' s judgment was correct for the reasons stated in its thorough memorandum opinion. Accordingly, w e aff irm. See8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny Holz’s motion for a writ o f mandamus.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Powerhouse Technologies Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Jay Elliot, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


_________________
Jay Elliot
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Date:  November 15, 2004