Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2022 / Notices 16455 

1See Fresh Garlic from the People’s Republic of 

China: Preliminary Results, Preliminary Rescission, 

and Final Rescission, In Part, of the 26th 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 

2020, 86 FR 67911 (November 30, 2021) 

(Preliminary Results), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

standards under an existing organic 

equivalency or recognition agreement. 

Certified organic soybean meal subject to 

this investigation has a protein content of 34 

percent or higher. 

Organic soybean meal that is otherwise 

subject to this investigation is included when 

incorporated in admixtures, including but 

not limited to prepared animal feeds. Only 

the organic soybean meal component of such 

admixture is covered by the scope of this 

investigation. 

The products covered by this investigation 

are currently classified under the following 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 

States (HTSUS) subheadings: 1208.10.0010 

and 2304.00.0000. Certified organic soybean 

meal may also enter under HTSUS 

2309.90.1005, 2309.90.1015, 2309.90.1020, 

2309.90.1030, 2309.90.1032, 2309.90.1035, 

2309.90.1045, 2309.90.1050, and 

2308.00.9890. 

The HTSUS subheadings and 

specifications are provided for convenience 

and customs purposes; the written 

description of the scope is dispositive. 

Appendix II 

List of Topics Discussed in the Decision 

Memorandum: 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Investigation 

IV. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and 

Adverse Inferences: Non-Cooperative 

and Non-Responsive Companies 

V. Subsidies Valuation 

VI. Analysis of Programs 

VII. Analysis of Comments 

Comment 1: Whether Bergwerff Failed to 

Identify an Affiliated Supplier 

Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should 

Apply Adverse Facts Available (AFA) to 

Bergwerff for Failing to Report Use of an 

Export Promotion Scheme 

Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should 

Countervail the Duty Drawback Benefits 

Received by Bergwerff for Organic 

Soybeans 

Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should 

Have Selected Additional Respondents 

for Individual Examination in this 

Investigation 

Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should 

Apply Total AFA to Shanti Overseas 

(India) Ltd. 

Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should 

Recalculate the Benefits Received Under 

the Duty-Free Importation of Capital 

Goods and Raw Materials, Components, 

Consumables, Intermediates, Spare Parts 

and Packing Material, and Exemption 

from Central Sales Tax (CST) on 

Purchases of Capital Goods and Raw 

Materials, Components, Consumables, 

Intermediates, Spare Parts, and Packing 

Material 

Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should 

Countervail the Exemption from 

Payment of Central Sales Tax (CST) on 

Purchases of Capital Goods and Raw 

Materials, Components, Consumables, 

Intermediates, Spare Parts and Packing 

Materials 

Comment 8: Whether Commerce Should 

Recalculate the Benefits Received Under 

the Merchandise Export Incentive 

Scheme (MEIS) Program 

Comment 9: Whether Commerce Should 

Countervail the Pre-Shipment and PostShipment Export Financing Program 

Comment 10: Whether Commerce Assigned 

the AFA Rate Twice for the SGMP 

Exemption from Electricity Duty and 

Cess on Electricity Supplied to a Special 

Economic Zone (SEZ) Unit Program 

Comment 11: Whether Commerce Should 

Countervail the Advance Authorization 

Program (AAP) and the Duty Drawback 

(DDB) Program 

Comment 12: Whether Commerce Should 

Apply AFA to the Non-Cooperative 

Mandatory Respondents that Withdrew 

from Participation in the Investigation 

Comment 13: Whether Commerce Should 

Apply AFA to the Government of India 

(GOI) 

Comment 14: Whether Commerce Correctly 

Initiated the Transportation and 

Marketing Assistance (TMA) for Special 

Agriculture Products 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–06155 Filed 3–22–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

U.S. Section Membership 

Opportunities for the United StatesIndia CEO Forum 

AGENCY: International Trade 

Administration (ITA), Department of 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice. 

The Department of Commerce, ITA, is 

amending the Notice published at 87 FR 

9318 (February 18, 2022), regarding the 

dates for submission of applications for 

appointment, or reappointment, to the 

U.S. Section of the U.S.-India CEO 

Forum. ITA will accept applications on 

a rolling basis for membership on the 

U.S. Section of the Forum for terms that 

will begin upon appointment and will 

expire on December 31, 2024. 

Immediate consideration will now be 

given to applications received by April 

6, 2022. ITA will accept nominations 

under this notice on an on-going basis 

during the charter term to fill vacancies 

as they arise. 

ADDRESSES: For inquiries and an 

application, please contact Noor 

Sclafani, International Trade Specialist, 

Office of South Asia, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, by email at noor.sclafani@

trade.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Noor Sclafani, International Trade 

Specialist, Office of South Asia, U.S. 

Department of Commerce, telephone: 

(202) 823–1840. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Please 

refer to Notice published at 87 FR 9318 

(February 18, 2022). 

Dated: March 18, 2022. 

Jed Diemond, 

Deputy Director, Office of South Asia. 

[FR Doc. 2022–06164 Filed 3–22–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–HE–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–831] 

Fresh Garlic From the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results and 

Final Rescission, In Part, of the 26th 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) has completed its 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on fresh garlic 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(China) for the period of review (POR) 

November 1, 2019, through October 31, 

2020. We determine that mandatory 

respondent, Jining Shunchang Import & 

Export Co., Ltd. (Shunchang) failed to 

establish its eligibility for a separate rate 

and, therefore, is part of the China-wide 

entity. We are rescinding the review 

with respect to Zhengzhou Harmoni 

Spice Co., Ltd. (Harmoni). 

DATES: Applicable March 23, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jacob Saude, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–0981. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On November 30, 2021, Commerce 

published the preliminary results of the 

twenty-sixth administrative review of 

fresh garlic from China.1 No interested 

party submitted comments concerning 

the Preliminary Results or requested 

that a hearing be held. Commerce 

conducted this administrative review in 

accordance with section 751 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
16456 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2022 / Notices 

2See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement 

of Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 

FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). 

3The companies that are part of the China-wide 

entity in this review are Jining Shunchang Import 

& Export Co., Ltd. and Jining Shunchang Food Co., 

Ltd. 

The current deadline for the final results 

is March 30, 2022. 

Scope of the Order 

The products subject to the order are 

all grades of garlic, whole or separated 

into constituent cloves, whether or not 

peeled, fresh, chilled, frozen, 

provisionally preserved, or packed in 

water or other neutral substance, but not 

prepared or preserved by the addition of 

other ingredients or heat processing. 

The differences between grades are 

based on color, size, sheathing, and 

level of decay. The scope of the order 

does not include the following: (a) 

Garlic that has been mechanically 

harvested and that is primarily, but not 

exclusively, destined for non-fresh use; 

or (b) garlic that has been specially 

prepared and cultivated prior to 

planting and then harvested and 

otherwise prepared for use as seed. The 

subject merchandise is used principally 

as a food product and for seasoning. The 

subject garlic is currently classifiable 

under subheadings: 0703.20.0000, 

0703.20.0005, 0703.20.0010, 

0703.20.0015, 0703.20.0020, 

0703.20.0090, 0710.80.7060, 

0710.80.9750, 0711.90.6000, 

0711.90.6500, 2005.90.9500, 

2005.90.9700, and 2005.99.9700, of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS). 

Although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

scope of the order is dispositive. In 

order to be excluded from the order, 

garlic entered under the HTSUS 

subheadings listed above that is: (1) 

Mechanically harvested and primarily, 

but not exclusively, destined for 

nonfresh use; or (2) specially prepared 

and cultivated prior to planting and 

then harvested and otherwise prepared 

for use as seed must be accompanied by 

declarations to U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) to that effect. 

Final Partial Rescission of 

Administrative Review 

In the Preliminary Results, Commerce 

determined that the review request from 

Roots Farm for Harmoni was invalid ab 

initio, and it preliminarily rescinded the 

administrative review with respect to 

Harmoni. Because Commerce did not 

receive any comments on its 

preliminary finding, Commerce 

continues to find that the review request 

from Roots Farm was invalid ab initio, 

and Commerce is rescinding this review 

with respect to Harmoni. 

China-Wide Entity 

Commerce’s policy regarding 

conditional review of the China-wide 

entity applies to this administrative 

review.2 Under this policy, the Chinawide entity will not be under review 

unless a party specifically requests, or 

Commerce self-initiates, a review of the 

entity. Because no party requested a 

review of the China-wide entity in this 

review, and Commerce did not selfinitiate a review, the entity is not under 

review and the entity’s rate (i.e., $4.71/ 

kg) is not subject to change. Aside from 

the companies for which the review has 

been or is being rescinded, Commerce 

considers all other companies for which 

a review was requested, and which did 

not preliminarily qualify for a separate 

rate, to be part of the China-wide entity. 

Final Results of Administrative Review 

Commerce determines that the 

following weighted-average dumping 

margin exists for the administrative 

review covering the period November 1, 

2019, through October 31, 2020: 

Exporter 

Weightedaverage 

margin 

(dollars per 

kilogram) 

China-Wide Entity 3 ..................... 4.71 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce 

has determined, and CBP shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of subject merchandise in 

accordance with the final results of this 

review. Commerce intends to direct CBP 

to assess rates based on the per-unit (i.e., 

per kilogram) amount on each entry of 

the subject merchandise during the 

POR. Commerce also intends to issue 

assessment instructions no earlier than 

35 days after the publication date of the 

final results of this review in the 

Federal Register. If a timely summons is 

filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

review for shipments of the subject 

merchandise from China entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date of this notice in the Federal 

Register, as provided by sections 

751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) For the 

companies identified in the chart above, 

the cash deposit rate will be the Chinawide rate; (2) for previously investigated 

or reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese 

exporters not listed above that have 

received a separate rate in a prior 

segment of this proceeding, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

exporter-specific rate published for the 

most recent period; (3) for all Chinese 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not been found to be entitled to a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the China-wide rate of 4.71 U.S. 

dollars per kilogram; and (4) for all nonChinese exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not received 

their own rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate applicable to Chinese 

exporter that supplied that non-Chinese 

exporter. These requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notifications Regarding Administrative 

Protection Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of return or destruction of 

APO materials, or conversion to judicial 

protective order, is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results in accordance with sections 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2022 / Notices 16457 

1See Notice of Amended Final Determinations: 

Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from Belgium and 

South Africa; and Notice of Countervailing Duty 

Orders: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from Belgium, 

Italy and South Africa, 64 FR 25288 (May 11, 1999) 

(Order). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 86 

FR 68220 (December 1, 2021). 

3See ATI’s Letter, ‘‘Five-Year (Sunset) Review of 

the Countervailing Duty Order on Stainless Steel 

Plate in Coils from South Africa—Domestic 

Interested Party’s Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ 

dated December 15, 2021; see also Outokumpu’s 

Letter, ‘‘Five-Year (Sunset) Review of the 

Countervailing Duty Order on Stainless Steel Plate 

in Coils from South Africa—Outokumpu’s Notice of 

Intent to Participate,’’ dated December 15, 2021. 

4See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘FiveYear (Sunset) Review of the Countervailing Duty 

Order on Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from South 

Africa—Domestic Interested Parties’ Substantive 

Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated January 3, 

2022. 

5See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews 

Initiated On December 1, 2021,’’ dated January 20, 

2022. 

6For a complete discussion of the scope, see 

Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum 

for the Final Results of the Fourth Sunset Review 

of the Countervailing Duty Order on Stainless Steel 

Plate in Coils from South Africa,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: March 14, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2022–06076 Filed 3–22–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–791–806] 

Stainless Steel Plate in Coils From 

South Africa: Final Results of the 

Expedited Fourth Five-Year Sunset 

Review of the Countervailing Duty 

Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset 

review, the Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) finds that revocation of the 

countervailing duty (CVD) order on 

stainless steel plate in coils (SSPC) from 

South Africa would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of 

countervailable subsidies at the levels 

indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset 

Review’’ section of this notice. 

DATES: Applicable March 23, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kristen Johnson, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4793. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On May 11, 1999, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of the CVD order on SSPC from 

South Africa.1 On December 1, 2021, 

Commerce published the notice of 

initiation of the fourth sunset review of 

the Order, pursuant to section 751(c) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act).2 On December 15, 2021, 

Commerce received notices of intent to 

participate from ATI Flat Rolled 

Products Holdings, LLC (ATI) and 

Outokumpu Stainless USA LLC 

(Outokumpu) (collectively, the domestic 

interested parties) within the deadline 

specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3

The domestic interested parties claimed 

interested party status within the 

meaning of section 771(9)(C) of the Act 

and 19 CFR 351.102(b)(29)(v) as 

domestic producers of SSPC in the 

United States. 

On January 3, 2022, Commerce 

received an adequate substantive 

response from the domestic interested 

parties within the 30-day deadline 

specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).4

Commerce did not receive a substantive 

response from either the Government of 

South Africa or a respondent interested 

party to this proceeding. On January 20, 

2022, Commerce notified the U.S. 

International Trade Commission that it 

did not receive an adequate substantive 

response from respondent interested 

parties.5 As a result, Commerce 

conducted an expedited (120-day) 

sunset review of the Order, pursuant to 

section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(B)(2) and (C)(2). 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the Order 

is certain stainless steel plate in coils. 

Stainless steel is an alloy steel 

containing, by weight, 1.2 percent or 

less of carbon and 10.5 percent or more 

of chromium, with or without other 

elements. The subject plate products are 

flat-rolled products, 254 mm or over in 

width and 4.75 mm or more in 

thickness, in coils, and annealed or 

otherwise heat treated and pickled or 

otherwise descaled. The subject plate 

may also be further processed (e.g., 

cold-rolled, polished, etc.) provided that 

it maintains the specified dimensions of 

plate following such processing. 

Excluded from the scope of the Order 

are the following: (1) Plate not in coils, 

(2) plate that is not annealed or 

otherwise heat treated and pickled or 

otherwise descaled, (3) sheet and strip, 

and (4) flat bars. 

The merchandise subject to the Order 

is currently classifiable in the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) at subheadings: 

7219.11.00.30, 7219.11.00.60, 

7219.12.00.06, 7219.12.00.21, 

7219.12.00.26, 7219.12.00.51, 

7219.12.00.56, 7219.12.00.66, 

7219.12.00.71, 7219.12.00.81, 

7219.31.00.10, 7219.90.00.10, 

7219.90.00.20, 7219.90.00.25, 

7219.90.00.60, 7219.90.00.80, 

7220.11.00.00, 7220.20.10.10, 

7220.20.10.15, 7220.20.10.60, 

7220.20.10.80, 7220.20.60.05, 

7220.20.60.10, 7220.20.60.15, 

7220.20.60.60, 7220.20.60.80, 

7220.90.00.10, 7220.90.00.15, 

7220.90.00.60, and 7220.90.00.80. 

Although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

merchandise subject to the Order is 

dispositive.6

Analysis of Comments Received 

A complete discussion of all issues 

raised in this sunset review, including 

the likelihood of continuation or 

recurrence of subsidization in the event 

of revocation of the Order and the 

countervailable subsidy rates likely to 

prevail if the Order were to be revoked, 

is provided in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. A list of the topics 

discussed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is attached as an 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS), which is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 

752(b) of the Act, we determine that 

revocation of the Order would be likely 

to lead to continuation or recurrence of 

countervailable subsidies at the 

following net countervailable subsidy 

rates: 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1