alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 247

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the contributions of the Reverend Dr.

versary of his death.Martin Luther King, Jr., on the thirtieth annistudy, reflect on, and celebrate the life of Dr.calling on the people of the United States tovance social justice and equality for all races andof nonviolent social and political change to adthe United States and the world and to the causeMartin Luther King, Jr., to the civil society of
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 247

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the life work of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., serves

as an inspiration to all people who believe in justice,

equality, and human rights;

Whereas Dr. King advanced his goals and principles with determination, faith, dignity, and courage in the face of

life-threatening opposition;
2

•HCON 247 EH

Whereas Dr. King raised the consciousness of the Nation to

fundamental injustices and inequalities in American society and moved the Nation significantly forward on the

long and unfinished road to racial harmony and reconciliation;

Whereas the work of Dr. King created a basis of understanding and respect for individuals, communities, and the Nation as a whole, to act cooperatively and courageously to

establish tolerance, justice, and equality among all people;

Whereas Dr. King’s life and political philosophy advocated

the need for men and women to strive to overcome oppression without resorting to violence;

Whereas Dr. King was the recipient of the 1964 Nobel Peace

Prize for his unrelenting efforts to bring about social and

racial justice;

Whereas Dr. King believed in, practiced, and urged others to

achieve political change and social equality through nonviolent means and dedicated his life to achieving the goal

of a fully integrated society;

Whereas there is still much work to be done in achieving full

reconciliation among America’s racial, social, and ethnic

communities and in creating a colorblind society;

Whereas Dr. King’s life was tragically ended on April 4,

1968, before completing his work and fulfilling his dream

of a Nation where people are not judged by the color of

their skin but by the content of their character; and

Whereas Dr. King’s political philosophy and life’s work shine

as a guiding light for all people who would live peacefully

together in freedom, both nationally and around the

world: Now, therefore, be it
3

•HCON 247 EH

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) recognizes the importance of the life and

4 work of the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

5 to the civil society and freedoms of the United

6 States of America;

7 (2) recognizes that Dr. King’s life was trag8 ically taken before the full achievement of his goals;

9 and

10 (3) calls on the people of the United States to

11 study, reflect on, and celebrate Dr. King’s life and

12 ideals in order to fulfill his dream of civil and

13 human rights for all people.

Passed the House of Representatives April 1, 1998.

Attest:

Clerk.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4636-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Missouri (FEMA-4636-DR), dated January 10, 2022, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This change occurred on February 22, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, David Gervino, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

This action terminates the appointment of DuWayne Tewes as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2022-05905 Filed 3-18-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Order filed, December 13, 2013

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00895

- CR

____________ JOSE DEJESUS ACOSTA JUNIOR , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 434th Judicial District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 11

- DCR

- 058827B



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due November 22, 2013

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the
record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Karen Woolsey , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Corey
Henry, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the
period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2014-5 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance
statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association.



By:

/s/ Corey HenryName:

Corey HenryTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerSantander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor(senior officer in charge of securitization ofthe depositor)Date:

March 30, 2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001006604
<NAME> HOUSECALL MEDICAL RESOURCES, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,612,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               33,281,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 6,106,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            39,613,000
<PP&E>                                       9,137,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,600,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             107,845,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,650,000
<BONDS>                                     23,292,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       103,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  63,032,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               107,845,000
<SALES>                                    143,010,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           143,010,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           141,649,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             3,645,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,865,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,960,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,188,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,772,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (902,000)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,674,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.33)
        

</TABLE>
#### Jose J.R. ESPINOZA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D. DIAZ, Correctional Counselor I at California City Correctional Facility; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-17002

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted January 16, 2018 *

Filed January 19, 2018

Jose J.R. Espinoza, Pro Se

•Before: REINHARDT, TROTT, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R, App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Jose J.R. Espinoza appeals pro se from the magistrate judge’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional claims arising from information in Espinoza’s classification file. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo whether the magistrate judge validly entered judgment on behalf of the district court. *Allen v. Meyer,*755 F.3d 866, 867-68 (9th Cir. 2014). We vacate and remand.

Espinoza consented to proceed before the magistrate judge. *See*28 U.S.C. § 636(c). The magistrate judge then screened and dismissed Espinoza’s action *289before the named defendants had been served. *See*28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A, 1915(e)(2)(B). Because all parties, including unserved defendants, must consent to proceed before the magistrate judge for jurisdiction to vest, *Williams v. King,*875 F.3d 500, 503-04 (9th Cir. 2017), we vacate the magistrate judge’s order and remand for further proceedings.

VACATED and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6400 

To revise the boundaries of certain John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources 

System units in New Jersey. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 29, 2016 

Mr. PALLONE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To revise the boundaries of certain John H. Chafee Coastal 

Barrier Resources System units in New Jersey. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL 

4 BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM MAP. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The map subtitled ‘‘Seidler Beach 

6 Unit NJ–02, Cliffwood Beach Unit NJ–03P, Conaskonk 

7 Point Unit NJ–04’’, dated August 1, 2014, that is in8 cluded in the set of maps entitled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Re9 sources System’’ referred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal 

10 Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)) and relating 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6400 IH

1 to certain John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources Sys2 tem units in New Jersey, is hereby replaced by another 

3 map subtitled ‘‘Seidler Beach Unit NJ–02/NJ–02P, 

4 Cliffwood Beach Unit NJ–03P, Conaskonk Point Unit 

5 NJ–04, Sayreville Unit NJ–15P, Matawan Point Unit 

6 NJ–16P’’ and dated October 7, 2016. 

7 (b) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior 

8 shall keep the replacement map referred to in subsection 

9 (a) on file and available for inspection in accordance with 

10 section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 

11 U.S.C. 3503(b)). 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2019136EN.01001201.xml

| 12.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 136/12

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

11 April 2019

(2019/C 136/05)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1264 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 125,30 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4648 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86168 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4370 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1304 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 135,20 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5885 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,606 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 321,71 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2830 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7593 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,4724 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5760 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5067 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8354 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6705 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5254 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 285,17 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,7752 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,5672 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4385 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 966,16 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6383 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,506 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 72,6590 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,848 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3221 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,2826 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 77,6855 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1264

JPY

Japanese yen

125,30

DKK

Danish krone

7,4648

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86168

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4370

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1304

ISK

Iceland króna

135,20

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5885

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,606

HUF

Hungarian forint

321,71

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2830

RON

Romanian leu

4,7593

TRY

Turkish lira

6,4724

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5760

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5067

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8354

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6705

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5254

KRW

South Korean won

1 285,17

ZAR

South African rand

15,7752

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,5672

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4385

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 966,16

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6383

PHP

Philippine peso

58,506

RUB

Russian rouble

72,6590

THB

Thai baht

35,848

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3221

MXN

Mexican peso

21,2826

INR

Indian rupee

77,6855

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7540

ANTONIO C. MONROE,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

DIRECTOR OF THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:16-cv-00856-JAG-RCY)

Submitted: March 29, 2018 Decided: April 3, 2018

Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio C. Monroe, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Bidwell Theisen, Senior Assistant 

Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, 

Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Antonio C. Monroe seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 

28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable 

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Monroe has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 147 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

  1st Session
S. RES. 147

 Designating the weeks beginning September 24, 1995, and September 22, 
   1996, as ``National Historically Black Colleges and Universities 
                    Week'', and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 30 (legislative day, June 19), 1995

Mr. Thurmond (for himself, Mr. Johnston, Mr. Pell, Mrs. Hutchison, Mr. 
  D'Amato, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Hollings, Ms. Moseley-Braun, Mr. Simon, Mr. 
  Gorton, Mr. Levin, Mr. Conrad, Mr. Lott, Mr. Warner, Mr. Kohl, Mr. 
Robb, Mr. Brown, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Pressler, and Mr. Bradley) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                            on the Judiciary

           September 20 (legislative day, September 5), 1995

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating the weeks beginning September 24, 1995, and September 22, 
   1996, as ``National Historically Black Colleges and Universities 
                    Week'', and for other purposes.

Whereas there are 103 historically black colleges and universities in the United 
        States;
Whereas black colleges and universities provide the quality education so 
        essential to full participation in a complex, highly technological 
        society;
Whereas black colleges and universities have a rich heritage and have played a 
        prominent role in American history;
Whereas black colleges and universities have allowed many underprivileged 
        students to attain their full potential through higher education; and
Whereas the achievements and goals of historically black colleges and 
        universities are deserving of national recognition: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the Senate designates the weeks beginning September 
24, 1995, and September 22, 1996, as ``National Historically Black 
Colleges and Universities Week''. The Senate requests the President of 
the United States to issue a proclamation calling on the people of the 
United States and interested groups to observe the weeks with 
appropriate ceremonies, activities, and programs to demonstrate support 
for historically black colleges and universities in the United States.
                                 <all>
```
#### Kathy Glenn CLAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PAPIK, Peace Officer, Serial No. 4017, individual and official capacity, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-56286

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted November 15, 2017 *

Filed November 28, 2017

Kathy Glenn Clay, Pro Se

Shaun Dabby Jacobs, Matthew Alex Scherb, Attorney, Los Angeles City Attorney’s Office, Los Angeles,- CA, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Kathy Glenn Clay appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment entered following a jury verdict in favor of defendant Papik in Clay’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 excessive force action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

Clay failed to preserve her challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence because Clay did not move for judgment as a matter of law either before or after the jury’s verdict. *See Nitco Holding Corp. v. Boujikian,*491 F.3d 1086, 1089 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[T]o preserve a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict in a civil case, a party must make two motions. First, a party must file a pre-verdict motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(a). Second, a party must file a post-verdict motion for judgment as a matter of law or, alternatively, a motion for a new trial, under Rule 50(b).” (citations omitted)).

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.