alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 215

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Congratulating the people of the Co-operative Retions. public of Guyana for holding multiparty elec-
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 215

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the people of Guyana voted on December 15, 1997,

to re-elect the ruling party, the People’s Progressive

Party/Civic (PPP/Civic);

Whereas the Guyanese people showed their strong belief in

the democratic process by approximately an 88 percent

voter turnout; and
2

•HCON 215 EH

Whereas although international observers such as the Organization of American States (OAS), the Commonwealth,

and the International Foundation of Electoral Systems

(IFES) have unanimously agreed, based on their observations on election day, that the polling process was free

and fair, it has been alleged that violations occurred in

the counting process, necessitating an audit of the elections by the Caribbean Community (CARICOM): Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) congratulates the people of Guyana for

4 holding multiparty presidential elections;

5 (2) supports the audit of the elections by the

6 Caribbean Community (CARICOM), an organization

7 deemed acceptable to all parties;

8 (3) calls on all parties to respect the outcome

9 of the audit as the final decision and make a vow

10 to peace and stability in Guyana; and

11 (4) calls on the newly elected president and the

12 opposition leadership of the Co-operative Republic of

13 Guyana to respect the rule of law and human rights.

Passed the House of Representatives April 28, 1998.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated November 22, 2017, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-220273) of Smart Trust 352,
comprising Smart Trust, Sustainable Impact Investing Trust, Series 11.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


November 22, 2017
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         323,480
<SECURITIES>                                     6,070
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,554
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               447,716
<PP&E>                                          58,507
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 927,404
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          497,549
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           364
<OTHER-SE>                                     429,491
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   927,404
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               190,495
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  157,437
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,042
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,058
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,546
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,512
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,512
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.51
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7184

ANTHONY MUSTAFAN CHISLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JAMES HOLWAGER, Chief Psychologist; RICHARD J. GRAHAM, JR., 

Assistant Warden; SHERRY HAFERKAMP, Psychologist; BOOTH, 

Psychologist; HARR, Social Worker, et al., individually and 

in their own official capacities,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District 

Judge. (8:09-cv-02099-DKC)

Submitted: August 24, 2011 Decided: September 22, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Mustafan Chisley, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon, 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, 

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Mustafan Chisley appeals the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.*

AFFIRMED

 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Chisley v. Holwager, No. 8:09-cv-02099-DKC (D. Md. 

July 9, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

 * We previously remanded this case to the district court for 

the limited purpose of enabling the court to determine whether 

Chisley had shown excusable neglect or good cause warranting an 

extension of time to appeal. Chisley v. Holwager, 2011 WL 

1320688 (4th Cir. Apr. 7, 2011) (No. 10-7184). On remand, the 

district court granted his motion for extension of time to file 

a notice of appeal. His appeal is therefore deemed timely 

filed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         752,230
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,984,197
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,833,394
<PP&E>                                          51,159
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,228
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,931,064
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,842,958
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        54,818
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,342,822
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,931,064
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,600,097
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             234,503
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,833,823)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,833,823)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.36)
        

</TABLE>
Mt. Tom Generating Co. LLC Analytical Laboratory 15 Agawam Avenue West Springfield, MA 01089 Phone (413) 214-6541 Fax (413) 214-6842 email-madhu.shah@gdfsuezna.com

Date Taken: Date Received:3/29/10 4/1/10 Sample Description: 4/16/10

# 6 Oil Bottom Source ID: Date Completed: 10-0498 Work Order: West Springfield Source #6 Fuel As Fired

Madhu Shah, Laboratory Supervisor

21445 Sample No:

CommentsAPI Gravity @ 60oF 11.4 ASTM D-287 Specific Gravity @ 60oF 0.9902 ASTM D-287 Pounds per Gallon 8.255 Sulfur, % 0.86 ASTM D-1552 Ash,% 0.07 ASTM D-482 BTU/Lb 18,355 ASTM D-240 BTU/Gal 151,530 ASTM D-240 Parameter Results ASTM Methods 4/16/10 Date Completed

$72.00 Cost Rush $0.00 Invoiced Price Preparation$80.00 Billing Status Billing Date completed 4/16/10 Date ChargedMt. Tom Generating Co. LLC Analytical Laboratory 15 Agawam Avenue West Springfield, MA 01089 Phone (413) 214-6541 Fax (413) 214-6842 email-madhu.shah@gdfsuezna.com

Date Taken: Date Received:3/30/10 4/1/10 Sample Description: 4/16/10

# 6 Oil Middle Source ID: Date Completed: 10-0498 Work Order: West Springfield Source #6 Fuel As Fired

Madhu Shah, Laboratory Supervisor

21447 Sample No:

CommentsAPI Gravity @ 60oF 11.3 ASTM D-287 Specific Gravity @ 60oF 0.9909 ASTM D-287 Pounds per Gallon 8.261 Sulfur, % 0.84 ASTM D-1552 Ash,% 0.05 ASTM D-482 BTU/Lb 18,245 ASTM D-240 BTU/Gal 150,720 ASTM D-240 Parameter Results ASTM Methods 4/16/10 Date Completed

$72.00 Cost Rush $0.00 Invoiced Price Preparation$80.00 Billing Status Billing Date completed 4/16/10 Date ChargedMt. Tom Generating Co. LLC Analytical Laboratory 15 Agawam Avenue West Springfield, MA 01089 Phone (413) 214-6541 Fax (413) 214-6842 email-madhu.shah@gdfsuezna.com

Date Taken: Date Received:3/30/10 4/1/10 Sample Description: 4/16/10

# 6 Oil Top Source ID: Date Completed: 10-0498 Work Order: West Springfield Source #6 Fuel As Fired

Madhu Shah, Laboratory Supervisor

21449 Sample No:

CommentsAPI Gravity @ 60oF 11.3 ASTM D-287 Specific Gravity @ 60oF 0.9909 ASTM D-287 Pounds per Gallon 8.261 Sulfur, % 0.84 ASTM D-1552 Ash,% 0.07 ASTM D-482 BTU/Lb 18,198 ASTM D-240 BTU/Gal 150,340 ASTM D-240 Parameter Results ASTM Methods 4/16/10 Date Completed

$72.00 Cost Rush $0.00 Invoiced Price Preparation$80.00 Billing Status Billing Date completed 4/16/10 Date Charged
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                  7
<CIK>                                      0001007008
<NAME>                                     VALLEY FORGE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           290,133
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       2,451
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 382,860
<CASH>                                           5,483
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           1,476,633
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          93,764
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,180,264
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              1,887,538
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           35,414
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,500
<OTHER-SE>                                     207,521
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,180,264
<PREMIUMS>                                     247,397
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             22,937
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               1,149
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   4,902
<BENEFITS>                                     233,364
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            29,595
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,426
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,836
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,590
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,590
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   171.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   171.80
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
<FN>
                                       17
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       7,190,558
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              207,187,854
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             351,377,969
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        61,710
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               351,377,969
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,672,926
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,572,606
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               249,068
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,330,633
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,100,320
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,701,633
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,398,687
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,398,687
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .37


</TABLE>
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 147

Designating the weeks beginning September 24, 1995, and September 22,

1996, as ‘‘National Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week’’,

and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 30 (legislative day, JUNE 19), 1995

Mr. THURMOND submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Designating the weeks beginning September 24, 1995, and

September 22, 1996, as ‘‘National Historically Black

Colleges and Universities Week’’, and for other purposes.

Whereas there are 103 historically black colleges and universities in the United States;

Whereas black colleges and universities provide the quality

education so essential to full participation in a complex,

highly technological society;

Whereas black colleges and universities have a rich heritage

and have played a prominent role in American history;

Whereas black colleges and universities have allowed many

underprivileged students to attain their full potential

through higher education; and
2

•SRES 147 IS

Whereas the achievements and goals of historically black colleges and universities are deserving of national recognition: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates the weeks be2 ginning September 24, 1995, and September 22, 1996, as

3 ‘‘National Historically Black Colleges and Universities

4 Week’’. The Senate requests the President of the United

5 States to issue a proclamation calling on the people of the

6 United States and interested groups to observe the weeks

7 with appropriate ceremonies, activities, and programs to

8 demonstrate support for historically black colleges and

9 universities in the United States.

Æ
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 16

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 12, 1997

Received and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Concerning the urgent need to improve the living standards

of those South Asians living in the Ganges and the

Brahmaputra River Basin.

Whereas some 400,000,000 people live in Bangladesh, northern India, and Nepal near the Ganges and Brahmaputra

Rivers and their tributaries;

Whereas these people comprise the largest concentration of

poor people in the world;

Whereas this region lacks the resources, especially the infrastructure, that can pull its residents out of poverty;
2

HCON 16 RFS

Whereas almost every year flooding by the Ganges and Brahmaputra Rivers produces death and destruction, sometimes on a vast scale;

Whereas during the dry seasons, water supplies do not meet

the needs of the region’s people, especially farmers;

Whereas despite these problems, the region has great potential for development;

Whereas Bangladesh, India, and Nepal have recognized for

many years that the water resources of the region, if

properly managed, could contribute greatly to the welfare

of millions of people in the region;

Whereas the Governments of Bangladesh and India signed a

30-year agreement on December 12, 1996, for the purpose of sharing the water of the Ganges River; and

Whereas in 1996 the Governments of India and Nepal signed

and ratified a treaty enabling the joint development of

the water resources of the Mahakali River: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) congratulates the Governments of Ban4 gladesh and India for their recent agreement on

5 sharing the water of the Ganges River;

6 (2) congratulates the Governments of India and

7 Nepal on their treaty enabling the joint development

8 of the water resources of the Mahakali River;

9 (3) respectfully offers its encouragement for the

10 three governments to continue their cooperation
3

HCON 16 RFS

1 which can do much to relieve the poverty of those

2 people living the Ganges and Brahmaputra River

3 Basin; and

4 (4) urges international financial institutions,

5 such as the World Bank and the Asian Development

6 Bank, and the international community to offer

7 whatever advice, encouragement, and assistance is

8 appropriate to help in this effort.

Passed the House of Representatives March 11,

1997.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned executive officers of Mayflower Bancorp, Inc. (the Registrant) hereby certify that this Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended April 30, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By:

/s/ Edward M. PrattName: Edward M. PrattTitle: President and Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ Maria VafiadesName: Maria VafiadesTitle: Chief Financial Officer


Date: July 21, 2011
#### IN RE: William Walter PLISE, Debtor, Tennille I. Plise, Appellant, v. Shelley D. Krohn, Chapter 7 Trustee; William Walter Plise, Appellees.

No. 15-60032

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 6, 2017 * Pasadena, California

Filed January 05, 2018

Louis Edward Humphrey, III, Attorney, Humphrey Lopez PLLC, Reno, NV, for Appellant

Jacob L. Houmand, Esquire, Attorney, Houmand Law Firm, Ltd., Las Vegas, NV, for Appellee Shelley D. Krohn

Lenard Schwartzer, Attorney, Schwart-zer & McPherson Law Firm, Las Vegas, NV, for Appellee William Walter Plise

Before: WARDLAW and GOULD, Circuit Judges, and COLLINS,** Chief District Judge.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2),

**

 The Honorable Raner C. Collins, Chief United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.

*450MEMORANDUM ***

Tennille Plise, the former spouse of Debtor William Plise, appeals the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit’s (BAP) affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s order sustaining the objection of Shelley Krohn, the Chapter 7 trustee for William Plise’s bankruptcy estate.

The BAP did not abuse its discretion by affirming the bankruptcy court’s order sustaining Krdhn’s claim objection on the basis of judicial estoppel. *See Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.,*270 F.3d 778, 782-83 (9th Cir. 2001). Plise held clearly inconsistent positions during the bankruptcy proceeding. The bankruptcy court accepted her prior position in the settlement agreement that $425,000 of the proceeds from the sale of the Austin property would go to unsecured creditors and release Plise from all remaining claims. Plise subsequently made a priority claim and argued that the $425,000 should go to her because she was an unsecured creditor. This change in position would provide her with an unfair advantage. *See id.*at 782. The BAP thus appropriately determined that Plise was judicially estopped from taking the current, inconsistent position that the $425,000 should go to her.

AFFIRMED.

***

 disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.