alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 33.2**

 

**MANAGEMENT’S ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE**

 

Management of the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (or “Company”) is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Management has determined that the servicing criteria in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are applicable in regard to the servicing platform as of and for the period as follows:

 

Platform: Publicly-issued *(i.e.,*transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) equipment loan-backed securities issued by CNH Equipment Trust 2014-C for which the Company provides trustee and paying agent services (the “Platform”).

 

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), to the extent required by Item 1122(d) servicing criteria in regards to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform, except for the following servicing criteria: 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with respect to the Platform (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”). With respect to the Platform, servicing criterion 1122(d)(3)(ii) is applicable only as it relates to remittances.

 

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2014 (the “Period”).

 

With respect to the Platform as of and for the Period, the Company’s management provides the following assertion of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

 

·                 The Company’s management is responsible for assessing the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

 

·                The Company’s management has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.

 

·                 Based on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

 

KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to management’s assertion of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.

 
|   | CITIBANK,   N.A. |
|--------|------------------|
|   |             |
|   | By:              | /s/   Nancy Lissemore |
|   |             |   |
|   | Its:             | Managing   Director |

 

Dated: March 27, 2015

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 25 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 25

Providing for acceptance of a statue of Jack Swigert, presented by the 
  State of Colorado, for placement in National Statuary Hall, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 1997

Mr. Dan Schaefer of Colorado (for himself, Mr. Hefley, Mr. McInnis, and 
Mr. Bob Schaffer) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which 
            was referred to the Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for acceptance of a statue of Jack Swigert, presented by the 
  State of Colorado, for placement in National Statuary Hall, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That (a) the statue of Jack Swigert, furnished by the State of Colorado 
for placement in National Statuary Hall in accordance with section 1814 
of the Revised Statutes of the United States (40 U.S.C. 187), is 
accepted in the name of the United States, and the thanks of the 
Congress are tendered to the State of Colorado for providing this 
commemoration of one of its most eminent personages.
    (b) The State of Colorado is authorized to use the rotunda of the 
Capitol on May 22, 1997, at 11 o'clock, ante meridiem, for a 
presentation ceremony for the statue. The Architect of the Capitol and 
the Capitol Police Board shall take such action as may be necessary 
with respect to physical preparations and security for the ceremony.
    (c) The statue shall be displayed in the rotunda of the Capitol for 
a period of not more than six months, after which period the statue 
shall be moved to its permanent location in National Statuary Hall.
    Sec. 2. The transcript of proceedings of the ceremony shall be 
printed, under the direction of the Joint Committee on the Library, as 
a House document, with illustrations and suitable binding. In addition 
to the usual number, there shall be printed 6,555 copies of the 
document, of which 450 copies shall be for the use of the House of 
Representatives, 105 copies shall be for the use of the Senate, 3,500 
copies shall be for the use of the Representatives from Colorado, and 
2,500 copies shall be for the use of the Senators from Colorado.
    Sec. 3. The Clerk of the House of Representatives shall transmit a 
copy of this concurrent resolution to the Governor of Colorado.
                                 <all>
```
I

SECTION 26 — EMISSION OF VISIBLE AIR CONTAMINANTS

A person shall not discharge Into the atmosphere, from any single source whatsoever, except for an

incinerator, any air contaminants for a period or periods aggregating more than three (3) minutes in any sixty (60) minute period, which is:

26.1.1 Of such opacity to a degree equal to 20 obscura

tion or greater.

26.1.2 Exceptions:

26.1.2.1 Smoke from fires permitted In Section 42 hereIn;

26.1.2.2 Where the presence of uncombined water is the only reason for the failure of an emission 4to meet the limitations herein, this Section shall not apply;

26.1.2.3 - Smoke discharged In the course of training Air

Pollution Control Inspectors to observe visible

-

—the

emissions, If written permission is obtained from

Control Officer specifying the times and dates

of such training.

26.2 Any existing source undergoing modification shall

within

incorporate control devices and methods calculated,

the maximum control capability which is

cation

technically

Is begun,

practicable -at the time that the modlfl—

to eliminate all visible emission from the source involved.

26.2.1 Any new source shall Incorporate control devices and methods calculated to produce zero (o) opacity

except for three (3) minutes in any sixty (60) mIn

opacity

utes during which time a visible emission of 2O

shall be permitted.

26.3 No person shill cause, suffer, allow or permit the

discharge Into the atmosphere from any incinerator

constructed, any air contaminants in excess of

five (5) percent opacity except for a period or

periods aggregating not more than one (1) minute in

any sixty (60) minute period during which time

a visible emission not in excess of twenty (20)

percent opacity shall be permitted.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 22, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 16171]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06015]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL21-9-000]


North Carolina Electric Membership Corporation v. Duke Energy 
Progress, LLC; Notice Granting Motion To Continue To Hold Proceeding in 
Abeyance

    On March 7, 2022, North Carolina Electric Membership Corporation 
(NCEMC) filed a motion to continue to hold the complaint filed in the 
above-captioned proceeding in abeyance until June 1, 2022. NCEMC 
represents that itself and Duke Energy Progress, LLC (DEP) have been 
negotiating an agreement to implement several changes to the Power 
Supply and Coordination Agreement at issue in this proceeding, but the 
parties need additional time to finalize the agreement. NCEMC asks that 
the Commission delay taking any action in this docket for an additional 
period up to and including June 1, 2022, to allow parties to continue 
to finalize these details. NCEMC also states that DEP supports the 
motion.
    Upon consideration, notice is hereby given that NCEMC's motion is 
granted. As such, the Commission will not take any action on the 
complaint filed in this proceeding until after June 1, 2022.

    Dated: March 16, 2022.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-06015 Filed 3-21-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
530 P.2d 402

#### The STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Adelina Sanchez SUAREZ, Appellant.

No. 2 CA-CR 439.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

Jan. 15, 1975.

As Corrected Jan. 24, 1975.

N. Warner Lee, Former Atty. Gen., Bruce E. Babbitt, Atty. Gen., by Galen H. Wilkes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, for appellee.

Leon Thikoll, Tucson, for appellant.

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Judge.

Appellant’s motion for post-conviction release under Rule 32.1 of 17 A.R.S, Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure was summarily dismissed without a hearing under Rule 32.6(c). We find that such dismissal was proper and we affirm.

On June 14, 1974, appellant was found guilty of the crimes of first-degree burglary with a prior conviction and grand theft with a prior conviction. She was placed on probation for ten years with the condition that she enter an in-patient heroin treatment program. On July 16 the county attorney filed a petition to revoke probation on the ground that appellant had violated the condition by continuing to use heroin while awaiting placement in the program. Probation was revoked on August IS and appellant was sentenced to two terms of 10 to 12 years in prison on the *46burglary conviction and the grand theft conviction, running concurrently. A motion for post-conviction release was filed on September 10 and on October 23, without a hearing, the motion was denied under Rule 32.6(c).

In her petition, appellant raised, • among other things, the argument of ineffective assistance of counsel to warrant post-conviction relief. Such a ground is within the scope of Rule 32.1. In the language of the comment to Rule 32.6:

> “If the court finds from the pleadings and record that all of the petitioner’s claims are frivolous and that it would not be beneficial to continue the proceedings, it may dismiss the petition. However, if the court finds any colorable claim, it is required by Townsend v. Sain, 83 S.Ct. 745, 372 U.S. 293, 9 L.Ed.2d 770 (1963) to make a full factual determination before deciding it on its merits.”

To be colorable, a claim has to have the appearance of validity. That is, if appellant’s contentions are taken as true, do they successfully show ineffectiveness of counsel ? We have no difficulty in saying no. The mere objecting to, or nonobjecting to, evidence and the omission of character witness testimony does not make appellant’s defense a sham. State v. Tellez, 111 Ariz. 34, 523 P.2d 62 (1974); State v. Brookshire, 107 Ariz. 21, 480 P.2d 985 (1971). The purpose of the summary disposition provision is to allow the judge to rid the court of no merit post-conviction motions without a full hearing. Such summary disposition was properly utilized.

Affirmed.

HOWARD, C. J., and KRUCKER, J„ concur.
**EXHIBITITEM 31.2**

SECTION 302CERTIFICATION

I, BruceN. Warner certify that:

1.         I have read thisquarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Northern California Bancorp, Inc.;

2.         Based on my knowledge,this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.         Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.         The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15eand 15d-15e) for the registrant and have:

a)              designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

b)             evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of theend of the period (the “Evaluation Date”); and

c)              presented in thisquarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.         The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee or registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)              all significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)             any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6.         The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether therewere significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that couldsignificantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recentevaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses.
| Date: August 10, 2006 |   | /s/ Bruce N. Warner           |
|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|                  |   | Bruce N. Warner               |
|                  |   | Chief Financial Officer & |
|                  |   | Principal Accounting Officer  |

 

----
SERVED: AUGUST 11, 2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS . A. -

WASHINGTON, DC ~ i. ' 

. -', ' .. __ ; .,_" 

IN THE MATTER OF 

NA YELLI FIGUEROA 

DOCKET NO. F AA-2015-2443 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

NOTICE OF ,ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2014S0190129) has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WI ooo1 

Scott B. Bennett, Respondent's Counsel 

The Bennett Law Center 

3377 SW 3rd Avenue 

Miami, FL 33145 

TEL: 305-648-2255 

FAX: 305-648-2256 

ONE COPY 

Ryan M. Landers, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, AS0-7 

Southern Region 

1701 ColumbiaAvenue 

College Park, GA 30337 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

Hon. J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2015-2443 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 35

Making majority party appointments to the Small Business Committee for

the One Hundred Fourth Congress.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 6 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1995

Mr. DOLE submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Making majority party appointments to the Small Business

Committee for the One Hundred Fourth Congress.

1 Resolved, That the following shall constitute the ma2 jority party’s membership on the following Senate commit3 tee for the One Hundred Fourth Congress, or until their

4 successors are appointed:

5 SMALL BUSINESS: Mr. Bond, Mr. Pressler, Mr.

6 Burns, Mr. Mack, Mr. Coverdell, Mr. Kempthorne, Mr.

7 Bennett, Mrs. Hutchison, Mr. Warner, and Mr. Frist.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 262 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con. Res.262
                                          Agreed to May 13, 1998        

                       One Hundred Fifth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  eight

                          Concurrent Resolution

 

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF D.C. SPECIAL OLYMPICS LAW 
              ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN THROUGH CAPITOL GROUNDS.

    On May 29, 1998, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House 
of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the 
Senate may jointly designate, the 1998 District of Columbia Special 
Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution referred to as 
the ``event'') may be run through the Capitol Grounds, as part of the 
journey of the Special Olympics torch to the District of Columbia 
Special Olympics summer games at Gallaudet University in the District 
of Columbia.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

    The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as may be 
necessary to carry out the event.

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

    The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical 
preparations for the event.

SEC. 4. APPLICABILITY OF PROHIBITIONS.

    Nothing in this resolution may be construed to waive the 
applicability of the prohibitions established by section 4 of the Act 
of July 31, 1946 (40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, 
displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
No. D-2651.

#### In re Disbarment of Clifford.

Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 566 U. S. 933.]
No. 11-8932.

#### In re Richards.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pau-peris*[566 U. S. 961] denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              JUL-13-1997
<CASH>                                         70,169 
<SECURITIES>                                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                  13,542 
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0 
<INVENTORY>                                         0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               85,295       
<PP&E>                                         27,443      
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                482,787      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          14,287    
<BONDS>                                       125,000  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<COMMON>                                          332 
<OTHER-SE>                                    336,958
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  482,787         
<SALES>                                         2,103          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               30,003          
<CGS>                                             704          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     704          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                573       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                14,801       
<INCOME-TAX>                                    4,509      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                   10,292 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .30 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0 
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERAND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Taxus Pharmaceuticals Holdings Inc (the Company) for the year ended June 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Jiayue Zhang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies that, to the best of my knowledge:  (1)the Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Companys financial condition and results of operations.  Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.  Date: October 13, 2016


| |                              
| | -----------------------------
| | /s/ Jiayue Zhang             
| | Jiayue Zhang                 
| | Chief Executive Officer      
| | (Principal Executive Officer)
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 07022

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 07022\07022_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

07022\07022_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

07022\07022_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 07022\07022_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07022\07022_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07022\07022_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07022\07022_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07022\07022_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

07022\Certification Statement Plant ID 07022.pdf Plant certification statement

x 07022\Supporting Documents\07022_coal pile runoff ponds.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07022\Supporting Documents\07022_USEPA ICR Wastewater Attachments Nearman Creek Power Station.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.