16764 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 57 / Thursday, March 24, 2022 / Notices 

Basin States (Arizona, California, and 

Nevada), local and tribal entities, water 

districts, and individuals that use 

Colorado River water. 

Total Estimated Number of Annual 

Respondents: 84. 

Total Estimated Number of Annual 

Responses: 491. 

Estimated Completion Time per 

Response: See table. 

Total Estimated Number of Annual 

Burden Hours: 103 hours. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Required to 

obtain or retain a benefit. 

Frequency of Collection: Monthly, 

annually, or otherwise as stipulated by 

the water user’s Colorado River water 

delivery contract with the Secretary of 

the Interior. 

Total Estimated Annual Nonhour 

Burden Cost: None. 

Frequency of data collection 

(monthly/annual) Form No. Number of respondents 

Minutes/ 

response 

Number 

responses/ 

respondent 

Total 

responses/ 

year 

Total 

hours/year 

Annual ................................. LC–72A .............................. 8 10 1 8 1 

Annual ................................. LC–72B .............................. 12 10 1 12 2 

Monthly ................................ Custom Forms .................... 37 12 12 444 89 

Annual ................................. Custom Forms .................... 27 25 1 27 11 

Total ............................. ............................................. 84 ........................ ........................ 491 103 

An agency may not conduct or 

sponsor and a person is not required to 

respond to a collection of information 

unless it displays a currently valid OMB 

control number. 

The authority for this action is the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). 

Jacklynn L. Gould, 

Regional Director, Interior Region 8: Lower 

Colorado Basin, Bureau of Reclamation. 

[FR Doc. 2022–06250 Filed 3–23–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4332–90–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1243] 

Certain Active Matrix OLED Display 

Devices and Components Thereof; 

Notice of Commission Decision Not To 

Review an Initial Determination 

Terminating the Investigation in Its 

Entirety Based on Settlement; 

Termination of the Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 32) of the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) 

terminating the investigation in its 

entirety based on settlement. The 

investigation is terminated. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Houda Morad, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–4716. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at https://

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

February 2, 2021, the Commission 

instituted this investigation under 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 

337’’), based on a complaint filed by 

Solas OLED Ltd. of Dublin, Ireland 

(‘‘Solas’’ or ‘‘Complainant’’). See 86 FR 

7878–79 (Feb. 2, 2021). The complaint, 

as amended and supplemented, alleges 

a violation of section 337 based upon 

the importation into the United States, 

the sale for importation, and the sale 

within the United States after 

importation of certain active matrix 

OLED display devices and components 

thereof by reason of infringement of 

claims 13–17 of U.S. Patent No. 

7,573,068 (‘‘the ’068 patent’’) and claims 

2–40 of U.S. Patent No. 7,868,880 (‘‘the 

’880 patent’’). See id. The notice of 

investigation names the following 

respondents: BOE Technology Group 

Co., Ltd. and Beijing BOE Display 

Technology Co., Ltd. of Beijing, China, 

and BOE Technology America, Inc. of 

Santa Clara, California (collectively 

‘‘BOE’’); and Samsung Electronics Co., 

Ltd. of Suwon-si, South Korea; Samsung 

Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield 

Park, New Jersey; and Samsung Display 

Co., Ltd. of Yongin-si, South Korea 

(collectively ‘‘Samsung’’). See id. The 

Office of Unfair Import Investigations 

(‘‘OUII’’) is also a party to the 

investigation. See id. 

On October 28, 2021, the Commission 

partially terminated the investigation as 

to the BOE respondents. See Order No. 

23 (Oct. 4, 2021), unreviewed by 

Comm’n Notice (Oct. 28, 2021). 

On October 29, 2021, the Commission 

terminated the investigation as to claims 

14–16 of the ’068 patent and claims 12, 

13, 15–19, 22–24, 34, 35, and 38–40 of 

the ’880 patent based on the withdrawal 

of the allegations in the complaint as to 

those claims. See Order No. 24 (Oct. 5, 

2021), unreviewed by Comm’n Notice 

(Oct. 29, 2021). 

On December 14, 2021, the 

Commission terminated the 

investigation as to claims 3–5, 7–9, 11, 

20, 21, 25–29, 31–33, 36, and 37 of the 

’880 patent based on the withdrawal of 

the allegations in the complaint as to 

those claims. See Order No. 28 (Nov. 16, 

2021), unreviewed by Comm’n Notice 

(Dec. 14, 2021). 

On March 1, 2022, Complainant and 

the remaining respondents, Samsung, 

filed a joint motion to terminate the 

investigation in its entirety based on 

settlement. On March 3, 2022, OUII 

filed a response in support of the joint 

motion. 

On March 4, 2022, the ALJ issued the 

subject ID (Order No. 32) granting the 

joint motion. The ID finds that ‘‘[t]he 

pending motion for termination 

complies with the Commission Rules.’’ 

See ID at 2. Specifically, the motion 

includes confidential and public copies 

of the settlement agreement (‘‘the 

Agreement’’) in accordance with 

Commission Rule 210.21(b)(1), 19 CFR 

210.21(b)(1). See id. In addition, as 

noted in the ID, the motion states that 

‘‘[o]ther than the Agreement, there are 

no other agreements, written or oral, 

express or implied, between Solas and 

Samsung concerning the subject matter 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 57 / Thursday, March 24, 2022 / Notices 16765 

of this Investigation.’’ See id. at 3. 

Furthermore, in accordance with 

Commission Rule 210.50(b)(2), 19 CFR 

210.50(b)(2), the ID finds ‘‘no evidence 

indicating that terminating this 

investigation based on the Agreement 

would be contrary to the public 

interest.’’ See id. 

No petition for review of the subject 

ID was filed. The Commission has 

determined not to review the subject ID. 

The investigation is terminated. 

The Commission’s vote for this 

determination took place on March 18, 

2022. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: March 18, 2022. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2022–06208 Filed 3–23–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1286] 

Certain Oil-Vaping Cartridges, 

Components Thereof, and Products 

Containing the Same; Commission 

Determination Not To Review an Initial 

Determination Granting in Part 

Complainant’s Motion To Amend the 

Complaint and Notice of Investigation 

and To Terminate the Investigation 

With Respect to a Respondent 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 20) of the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’), 

granting in part complainant’s motion to 

amend the complaint and notice of 

investigation and to terminate the 

investigation as to respondent BBTank 

USA, LLC (‘‘BBTank’’) based upon 

withdrawal of allegations in the 

complaint. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Cathy Chen, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202– 

205–2392. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on November 10, 2021, based on a 

complaint filed on behalf of Shenzhen 

Smoore Technology Limited (‘‘Smoore’’) 

of China. 86 FR 62567–69 (Nov. 10, 

2021). The complaint, as supplemented, 

alleged violations of section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain oil-vaping 

cartridges, components thereof, and 

products containing the same by reason 

of infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent Nos. 10,357,623; 10,791,763; 

10,791,762; and U.S. Registered 

Trademark No. 5,633,060. Id. at 62567– 

68. The complaint further alleged that a 

domestic industry exists. Id. at 62568. 

The Commission’s notice of 

investigation named numerous 

respondents including BBTank of 

Lambertville, Michigan; BoldCarts.com 

of Tempe, Arizona; Bold Crafts, Inc. of 

Irvine, California; Green Tank 

Technologies Corp. of Canada; Blinc 

Group Holdings, LLC of New York, New 

York; and BulkCarts.com of Canton, 

Michigan. Id. at 62568. The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) is 

also named as a party in this 

investigation. Id. 

On February 1, 2022, Smoore filed a 

motion for leave to amend the 

complaint and notice of investigation 

pursuant to Commission Rule 

210.14(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.14(b)(1). 

Specifically, Smoore’s motion requests 

to: (1) Change the corporate entity name 

of Respondents BoldCarts.com and Bold 

Crafts, Inc., to Bold Crafts, LLC d/b/a 

Bold Carts and BoldCarts.com; (2) 

change the corporate entity name of 

Respondent Green Tank Technologies 

Corp. to Greentank Technologies Corp.; 

(3) change the corporate entity name of 

Blinc Group Holdings, LLC, to The 

Blinc Group Inc.; (4) change the 

corporate entity name of Respondent 

BulkCarts.com to Zachary R. Esquivel d/ 

b/a ZRE Enterprises Inc. and 

ceramiccellcartridges.com; (5) substitute 

Respondent BBTank with proposed 

respondents DES Products Ltd. d/b/a 

O2VAPE and TCM Enterprises, LLC d/ 

b/a O2VAPE; (6) terminate the 

investigation as to Respondent BBTank 

based on withdrawal of allegations in 

the complaint; (7) delete paragraph 148 

of the complaint alleging trademark 

infringement by Respondent BBTank; 

(8) name additional proposed 

respondent AEG Holdings (HK) Ltd. n/ 

k/a AVD Holdings Ltd.; and (9) replace 

Exhibit 36 to the complaint. See Order 

No. 20 at 1–2 (Feb. 23, 2022). OUII, 

BBTank, and proposed respondents DES 

Products Ltd. and TCM Enterprises, 

LLC, filed responses to Smoore’s 

motion. Id. at 2. 

On February 23, 2022, the ALJ issued 

the subject ID granting in part the 

motion. Id. at 11. The ID granted 

Smoore leave to amend the complaint 

and notice of investigation to: (1) 

Change the names of Respondents 

BoldCarts.com and Bold Crafts, Inc., to 

Bold Crafts, LLC d/b/a Bold Carts and 

BoldCarts.com; (2) change the name of 

Respondent Green Tank Technologies 

Corp. to Greentank Technologies Corp.; 

(3) change the name of Blinc Group 

Holdings, LLC, to The Blinc Group Inc.; 

and (4) replace Exhibit 36 to the 

complaint. Id. at 3–4, 10. The ID also 

found that Smoore’s request to 

terminate BBTank from the 

investigation complies with 

Commission Rule 210.21(a)(1), 19 CFR 

210.21(a)(1), and that no extraordinary 

circumstances warrant denying the 

request. Id. at 9–10. No petitions for 

review were filed. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the subject ID. The complaint 

and notice of investigation are amended 

as indicated above, and Respondent 

BBTank is hereby terminated from the 

investigation. 

The Commission vote for this 

determination took place on March 18, 

2022. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in Part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR part 

210. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: March 18, 2022. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2022–06207 Filed 3–23–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES