alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Lunar Growth Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Rozelle, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: October 12, 2010





/s/ Joseph RozelleJoseph Rozelle

President

(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)











The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 88 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

  1st Session
S. RES. 88

  Honoring the 92d birthday of Mike Mansfield, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 16, 1995

    Mr. Baucus (for himself, Mr. Burns, Mr. Dole, and Mr. Daschle) 
 submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Honoring the 92d birthday of Mike Mansfield, and for other purposes.

Whereas Mike Mansfield brought honor to the State of Montana as a professor, 
        Congressman, and Senator during a period that spanned more than 40 
        years;
Whereas Mike Mansfield claims the distinction of being the youngest World War I 
        veteran in the United States, and of having served as an enlisted man in 
        the Navy, Army, and Marines, all before the age of 20;
Whereas Mike Mansfield served as Senate Majority Leader for a record 16 years;
Whereas Mike Mansfield was instrumental in passing the 26th Amendment to the 
        Constitution, giving people age 18 to 20 the right to vote;
Whereas as a freshman Congressman, Mike Mansfield served as an East Asian 
        adviser to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt during World War II, and 
        later served as the United States Ambassador to Japan for over 11 years;
Whereas Mike Mansfield performed all of the above tasks to the highest possible 
        standards, and is a shining example of integrity and public service to 
        Montana and the United States; and
Whereas Mike Mansfield will celebrate his 92d birthday on Thursday, March 16, 
        1995: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate congratulates and sends the warmest 
birthday wishes to Mike Mansfield, a beloved former colleague of the 
United States Senate, on the grand occasion of his 92d birthday on 
Thursday, March 16, 1995.
                                 <all>
```
Sep 30 2010 

Mr. Randy Hansen 

Government Relations Director 

Experimental Aircraft Association 

3000 Poberezny Road 

Oshkosh, WI 54901 

Dear Mr. Hansen: 

This is the response to your March 22, 2006 letter (public docket No. FAA-2008-1010) on 

behalf of Experimental Aircraft Association (EAA) in which you petition the Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) to delete § 61.415(b)(1) of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (CFR). 

EAA’s request for rulemaking was purposely not included in the FAA’s 2006 Notice Of 

Proposed Rulemaking for Light Sport Aircraft that became a final rule on April 2, 2010. The 

justification for the request alludes to a certificated flight instructor (CFI) holding a 

commercial pilot certificate having the ability to train an airline transport pilot certificate 

candidate. Your justification is inaccurate. An airline transport pilot candidate needs no 

endorsement or instruction from an authorized instructor as this candidate has the ability to 

self endorse for the practical test. 

It has always been the practice that an instructor has the applicable certificate for what is 

being instructed. In this manner, a subpart H instructor has a minimum of a commercial 

certificate and, thereby, can complete endorsements through that level. Conversely, a 

subpart K sport pilot instructor with only a sport pilot certificate can only instruct to that 

level. This has been addressed on numerous occasions with the last legal interpretation dated 

July 24, 2009 which has been enclosed for your reference. 

Your petition for rulemaking is denied, and we will take no further action on your petition. 

We are closing Docket No. FAA-2008-1010. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Raymond Towles 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
#### AEQUADIS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HCL AMERICA, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-17337

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted December 5, 2017 San Francisco, California

Filed February 14, 2018

*426Peter Roldan, Christopher Wimmer, Emergent LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant

Ayse Kuzucuoglu, Vedder Price LLP, San Francisco, CA, Chad Schiefelbein, Vedder Price P.C., Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: N.R. SMITH * and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and KEELEY,** District Judge.

*

This case was submitted to a panel that included Judge Kozinski, who recently retired. Following Judge Kozinsld’s retirement, Judge N.R. Smith was drawn by lot to replace him. Ninth Circuit General Order 3.2.h. Judge Smith has read the briefs, reviewed the record, and listened to oral argument.

**

 The Honorable Irene M. Keeley, United States District Judge for the Northern District of West Virginia, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

In this diversity action by AeQuadis, Inc. against HCL America, Inc. asserting breach of contract and unjust enrichment, the district court granted summary judgment to HCL, holding that AeQuadis had assigned all of its rights under the relevant contract to a third party. We have jurisdiction of AeQuadis’ appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Under Illinois law, “whether an assignment of contract rights has occurred is a function of the intent of the parties.” *McHenry Hosp. v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.,*578 F.Supp. 122, 124 (N.D. Ill. 1983). If an assignment is memorialized in a clear and unambiguous writing, a court must determine the intention of the parties solely from the plain language of the contract. *Cf. Strosberg v. Brauvin Realty Servs., Inc.,*295 Ill.App.3d 17, 229 Ill.Dec. 361, 691 N.E.2d 834, 844 (1998).

AeQuadis entered into a Master Purchase and Sale Agreement with Bibby Financial Services (MidWest), Inc. (“Bibby”), in which it assigned “all of [AeQuadis’] right, title and interest” in its existing and future accounts to Bibby. “ ‘[A]1F is an all-encompassing term and leaves little doubt as to what rights the [plaintiffs] assigned to the [third party] and what rights they retained. In short, ‘all’ means all.” *Knott v. McDonald’s Corp.,*147 F.3d 1065, 1067 (9th Cir. 1998). Because the assignment by AeQuadis plainly transferred, to Bibby “all” accounts, the district court did not err in concluding that AeQuadis has no further rights in those accounts.

AFFIRMED.

***

 ^his disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule.36-3.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERAND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Taxus Pharmaceuticals Holdings Inc (the Company) for the year ended June 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Jiayue Zhang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies that, to the best of my knowledge:  (1)the Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Companys financial condition and results of operations.  Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.  Date: October 13, 2016


| |                              
| | -----------------------------
| | /s/ Jiayue Zhang             
| | Jiayue Zhang                 
| | Chief Financial Officer      
| | (Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT
        32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Migo Software, Inc. (the "Company")
        on
        Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard Liebman,
        Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the
        Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
        to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
        knowledge:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:
        May
        14, 2007
 
 
 /s/
        Richard Liebman
 Richard
        Liebman
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 Principal
        Financial and Accounting Officer
   The
          foregoing Certification shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any
          general statement incorporating by reference this report into any filing under
          the
          Securities Act of 1933 or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
          except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this information by
          reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.
Gormas. Michael (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Mr. Todd Homan, Director. 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

US Dept. Of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. Homan 

AI Monday, Rubin ··--I!!JII··· November 10, 2014 1:06 PM 

Gormas, Michael (OST) 

sally_smith@begich.senate.gov,chad.padgett@mail.house.gov,kevin_sweeney@murkows 

ki.senate.gov,citytke@gmail.com,info@flyalaskaseaplanes.com; 

chad.padgett@mail.house.gov; kevin_sweeney@murkowski.senate.gov; 

citytke@gmail.com; info@flyalaskaseaplanes.com 

Essential Air Service, USDOT Determination 80-1-167 

November 7, 2014 .. ···~ ··c 

' :···; 

Please continue to provide Essential Air Service to Tenakee Springs, Alaska through Juneau, Alaska. 

Juneau, the State Capitol and our life line, is the center of air service in South East Alaska. Alaska Seaplane Service has 

provided safe, frequent, timely, and efficient air service to our community for years. Weather in South East Alaska is a 

major factor in providing service to Tenakee Springs and service from any other city would significantly impact our ability 

to get timely mail and freight. Juneau is the only City where services such as large grocery and household goods are 

available to our community. 

Please approve Alaska Seaplane Service's Application to continue serving Tenakee Springs. 

Thank You 

The Rubin Family 

• Tenakee Springs, • Ak. 99841 

1
#### Jesse Tyler SMITH Plaintiff-Appellant v. AQUA-CARE MARKETING, LLC, et al. Defendants-Appellees

No. 17-1615

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: November 7, 2017

Filed: December 18, 2017

Jesse Tyler Smith, Pro Se

Thomas Stein, Kansas City, MO, Bruce Henry Stoltze, Sr., Stoltze & Stoltze, Des Moines, IA, for Defendants-Appellees

*384Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Jesse Smith brought this pro se diversity action against Aqua-Care Marketing, LLC and three of its officers and employees, asserting, *inter alia,*three breach of contract claims and a claim of malicious prosecution. Ruling on cross motions for summary judgment at the conclusion of discovery, the district court1 denied Smith’s motion as untimely, denied defendants summary judgment on the breach of contract claims, and granted summary judgment on the malicious prosecution claim. Some weeks later, the court entered a final order declining to exercise jurisdiction over the state law breach of contract claims and dismissing those claims without prejudice because the amount in controversy was far below the minimum required for federal diversity jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Smith appeals the grant of summary judgment dismissing his malicious prosecution claim. He does not appeal the district court’s decision to dismiss the breach of contract claims without prejudice. Thus, those claims have not been finally resolved.

Having carefully reviewed the record and the arguments on appeal, we conclude that summary judgment dismissing the malicious prosecution claim was properly granted. The record does not include evidence that would allow a reasonable jury to find that law enforcement would not have brought criminal charges that were ultimately dismissed in the absence of false information knowingly supplied by defendants, or that defendants engaged in actions beyond merely supplying false information or making an accusation. See Peterson v. Kopp, 754 F.3d 594, 598 (8th Cir. 2014) (de novo review); see also Fisher v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 619 F.3d 811, 823 (8th Cir. 2010); Linn v. Montgomery, 903 N.W.2d 337, 345-47 (Iowa 2017). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Brian C. Wimes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001006762
<NAME> ARCA CORP.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          45,895
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,411
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               179,913
<PP&E>                                       3,571,651
<DEPRECIATION>                                 205,249
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,632,451
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          219,772
<BONDS>                                      3,564,779
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           209
<OTHER-SE>                                   (152,309)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,632,451
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               203,778
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  148,539
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              74,460
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (19,221)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (19,221)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (19,221)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.009)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.009)
        

</TABLE>
No. D-2645.

#### In re Disbarment of Katz.

Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 566 U. S. 933.]
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 13, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 16028]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-05827]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8224]

Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to the Central Government of 
South Sudan

    Pursuant to Section 7031(b)(3) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012 (Div. I, Pub. 
L. 112-74) (``the Act''), and Department of State Delegation of 
Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that it is important to the 
national interest of the United States to waive the requirements of 
Section 7031(b)(1) of the Act with respect to South Sudan, and I hereby 
waive this restriction.
    This determination and the accompanying Memorandum of Justification 
shall be reported to the Congress, and the determination shall be 
published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: February 24, 2012.
Thomas R. Nides,
Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources.

    Editorial Note:  This document was received in the Office of the 
Federal Register on March 8, 2013.

[FR Doc. 2013-05827 Filed 3-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-26-P
```
No. D-2627.

#### In re Disbarment of Burkenroad.

Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 566 U. S. 918.]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                           ONYX ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        Three Months Ended 
                                                             March 31,
                                                    --------------------------
                                                       1997            1996
                                                    ----------      ----------
<S>                                                 <C>             <C>       
PRIMARY:
Net Income (loss)                                   $  612,444      $3,199,758
                                                    ==========      ==========
Shares as adjusted:
Weighted average common shares outstanding           5,962,174       3,079,050

Incremental shares from outstanding
stock options and warrants as determined under
the treasury stock method                              390,059         618,474
                                                    ----------      ----------
Shares as adjusted                                   6,353,233       3,697,524
                                                    ==========      ==========
Net income (loss) per share                         $     0.10      $     0.87
                                                    ==========      ==========
FULLY DILUTED: Net Income (loss)                    $  612,444      $3,199,758
                                                    ==========      ==========
  Shares as adjusted:
Weighted average common shares
outstanding                                          5,962,174       3,079,050
Incremental shares from outstanding
stock options as determined under
the treasury stock method                              390,059         618,474
                                                    ----------      ----------
Shares as adjusted                                   6,352,233       3,697,524
                                                    ==========      ==========
Net income (loss) per share                         $     0.10      $     0.87
                                                    ==========      ==========
ONYX ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1




Annual Servicer’s Certificate


Provided by Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation


to Holders of Notes and Certificates









NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION




OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE




The undersigned, Michael J. McConnell, Vice-President of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as an Authorized Officer of the Company:
  (1)           The undersigned has caused a review, under his supervision, to be made of:  i) the activities; and ii) the performance under the Agreement, of the Company during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”); and
  (2)           To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, i) the Company has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects during the Reporting Period; and ii) no Servicer Default has occurred.
  This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to (i) Section 3.01(c) of the Servicing Agreement, as may be amended, modified or supplemented from time to time, dated as of March 1, 1999, by and among Nissan-Infiniti LT, NILT Trust, as UTI Beneficiary, and the Company, as Servicer; and (ii) Section 8.11(b) of the 2014-B SUBI Servicing Supplement, dated as of October 15, 2014, by and among Nissan-Infiniti LT, as Titling Trust, NILT Trust, as Grantor and UTI Beneficiary, and the Company, as Servicer (the “Agreement”).
  Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein have the meaning assigned to them in the Agreement.
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 15th day of June, 2016.


/s/ Michael J. McConnell________________


Michael J. McConnell


Vice President