Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2022 / Notices 16493 

Neither inclusion in the Tentative List 

nor inscription as a World Heritage Site 

imposes legal restrictions on owners or 

neighbors of sites, nor do they give the 

United Nations any management 

authority or ownership rights in U.S. 

World Heritage Sites, which continue to 

be subject only to U.S. federal and local 

laws, as applicable. 

Authority: 54 U.S.C. 307101; 36 CFR 

part 73. 

Shannon A. Estenoz, 

Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and 

Parks. 

[FR Doc. 2022–06121 Filed 3–22–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–52–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Park Service 

[NPS–WASO–NAGPRA–NPS0033621; 

PPWOCRADN0–PCU00RP14.R50000] 

Notice of Intent To Repatriate Cultural 

Items: U.S. Department of the Interior, 

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, 

DC 

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the 

Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), 

in consultation with the appropriate 

Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian 

organizations, has determined that the 

cultural items listed in this notice meet 

the definition of unassociated funerary 

objects. Lineal descendants or 

representatives of any Indian Tribe or 

Native Hawaiian organization not 

identified in this notice that wish to 

claim these cultural items should 

submit a written request to the BIA. If 

no additional claimants come forward, 

transfer of control of the cultural items 

to the lineal descendants, Indian Tribes, 

or Native Hawaiian organizations stated 

in this notice may proceed. 

DATES: Lineal descendants or 

representatives of any Indian Tribe or 

Native Hawaiian organization not 

identified in this notice that wish to 

claim these cultural items should 

submit a written request with 

information in support of the claim to 

the BIA at the address in this notice by 

April 22, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. 

BJ Howerton, NAGPRA Coordinator, 

Bureau of Indian Affairs, 1001 Indian 

School Road NW, Room 341, 

Albuquerque, NM 87104, telephone 

(505) 563–3013, email BJ.Howerton@

bia.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is 

here given in accordance with the 

Native American Graves Protection and 

Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 

3005, of the intent to repatriate cultural 

items under the control of the U.S. 

Department of the Interior, Bureau of 

Indian Affairs, Washington, DC, and in 

the physical custody of the Arizona 

State Museum, University of Arizona, 

Tucson, AZ (ASM), that meet the 

definition of unassociated funerary 

objects under 25 U.S.C. 3001. 

This notice is published as part of the 

National Park Service’s administrative 

responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 

U.S.C. 3003(d)(3). The determinations in 

this notice are the sole responsibility of 

the museum, institution, or Federal 

agency that has control of the Native 

American cultural items. The National 

Park Service is not responsible for the 

determinations in this notice. 

History and Description of the Cultural 

Items 

Between 1963 and 1977, 40 cultural 

items were removed from site AZ 

P:14:1(ASM), also known as the 

Grasshopper Pueblo, in Navajo County, 

AZ. The items were removed during 

legally authorized excavations 

conducted by the University of Arizona 

Archeological Field School. 

Archeological collections from the site 

were brought to ASM at the end of each 

field season and accessioned. The 40 

unassociated funerary objects are 39 tree 

ring samples and one piece of mineral 

pigment. 

Site AZ P:14:1(ASM) is a large village 

site containing approximately 500 

rooms in more than a dozen stone room 

blocks arranged around three main 

plazas. The site has been dated to A.D. 

1275–1400 based on tree ring dates, 

architectural forms, building 

technology, and ceramic styles. These 

characteristics, the mortuary pattern, 

and other items of material culture are 

consistent with the archeologically 

described Upland Mogollon or 

prehistoric Western Pueblo tradition. 

In the summers of 1939 and 1940, 136 

cultural items were removed from site 

AZ P:16:1(ASM), also known as Bear 

Ruin, in Navajo County, AZ. These 

excavations were legally authorized and 

carried out by Emil Haury under the 

auspices of ASM and the Department of 

Anthropology at the University of 

Arizona. Archeological collections from 

Haury’s excavations were brought to 

ASM at the end of each field season and 

accessioned. The 136 unassociated 

funerary objects are one bone awl, two 

bone awl fragments, one incised bone, 

39 ceramic bowls, one ceramic canteen, 

one ceramic disc, five ceramic vessel 

fragments, one human figurine 

fragment, 25 ceramic jars, six miniature 

vessels, seven ceramic pitchers, eight 

sherds, 18 pieces of mineral concretion 

or pigment, one piece of unfired clay, 

two turquoise beads, three turquoise 

pendants, 14 shell bracelet fragments, 

and one shell necklace. 

Site AZ P:16:1(ASM) consists of 14 

houses, two storage rooms, and a kiva. 

The site has been dated to A.D. 600–800 

based on ceramic styles, architectural 

forms, and tree-ring data. These 

characteristics, the mortuary pattern, 

and other items of material culture are 

consistent with the Mogollon 

archeological tradition. 

In the summers of 1940 and 1941, 63 

cultural items were removed from site 

AZ P:16:2(ASM), also known as Tla Kii, 

in Navajo County, AZ. These 

excavations were legally authorized and 

carried out by Emil Haury under the 

auspices of ASM and the Department of 

Anthropology at the University of 

Arizona. Archeological collections from 

Haury’s excavations were brought to 

ASM at the end of each field season and 

accessioned. The 63 unassociated 

funerary objects are 32 ceramic bowls, 

one ceramic canteen, three ceramic 

vessel fragments, one human figurine 

fragment, seven ceramic jars, one 

miniature vessel, three ceramic pitchers, 

one ceramic plate, one ceramic scoop, 

one ceramic scraper, one sherd, two 

lithic scrapers, one piece of mineral 

concretion, six lots of stone beads, and 

two turquoise pendants. 

Site AZ P:16:2(ASM) consists of three 

pit houses, one storage structure, two 

other structures, a main pueblo, two 

kivas, and 14 storage pits. Based on 

architectural forms and ceramic styles, 

along with other items of material 

culture, the site is dated to A.D. 900– 

1200, and it is associated with the 

Mogollon archeological tradition. 

In the summers of 1941 and 1944, one 

cultural item was removed from site AZ 

P:16:20(ASM), also known as Bluff Site, 

in Navajo County, AZ. These 

excavations were legally authorized and 

carried out by Emil Haury under the 

auspices of ASM and the Department of 

Anthropology at the University of 

Arizona. Archeological collections from 

Haury’s excavations were brought to 

ASM at the end of each field season. 

Collections were not accessioned upon 

receipt at ASM; an accession of ‘‘none 

1940s’’ was later assigned. The one 

unassociated funerary object is a 

ceramic bowl. 

Site AZ P:16:20(ASM) comprises a pit 

house village dating to the Cottonwood 

and Hilltop phases of the Mogollon 

archeological culture, and it dates to 

A.D. 200–600 based on architectural 

forms and tree-ring samples. 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
16494 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2022 / Notices 

In the summer of 1966, three cultural 

items were removed from site AZ 

P:16:62(ASM), also known as Skiddy 

Canyon Ruin, in Navajo County, AZ. 

These excavations were legally 

authorized and were carried out in 

conjunction with the ASM and the 

Museum of Northern Arizona under the 

direction of Laurens Hammack of ASM 

as part of the Highway Salvage program 

of the Arizona Highway Department 

(project no. F–026–1[17]). Archeological 

collections from these excavations were 

transferred to ASM in March of 1967. 

The three unassociated funerary objects 

are one ceramic pitcher, one ceramic jar, 

and one shell bead. 

Site AZ P:16:62(ASM) consists of a pit 

house, kiva, eight-room pueblo, and 

associated trash areas. Based on 

architectural forms and ceramic styles, 

along with other items of cultural 

belongings, the site dates to A.D. 600– 

1200, and it is associated with the 

Mogollon archeological tradition. 

A detailed discussion of the basis for 

cultural affiliation of archeological sites 

in the region where the above sites are 

located may be found in ‘‘Cultural 

Affiliation Assessment of White 

Mountain Apache Tribal Lands (Fort 

Apache Indian Reservation)’’ by John R. 

Welch and T.J. Ferguson (2005). To 

summarize, archeologists have used the 

terms Upland Mogollon or prehistoric 

Western Pueblo to define the 

archeological complex represented by 

the above-described sites. The material 

culture of these traditions is 

characterized by a temporal progression 

from earlier pit houses to later masonry 

pueblos, villages organized in room 

blocks of contiguous dwellings 

associated with plazas, rectangular 

kivas, polished and paint decorated 

ceramics, unpainted corrugated 

ceramics, weaving traditions, 

inhumation burials, cradleboard cranial 

deformation, grooved stone axes, and 

bone artifacts. Archeologists have long 

linked the Western Pueblo tradition to 

present-day Indian Tribes in the region 

belonging to the Western Pueblo 

ethnographic group and in particular, to 

the Hopi Tribe of Arizona and the Zuni 

Tribe of the Zuni Reservation, New 

Mexico. The similarities in ceramic 

traditions, burial practices, architectural 

forms, and settlement patterns have led 

archeologists to believe that the 

prehistoric inhabitants of the Mogollon 

Rim region migrated north and west to 

the Hopi mesas, and north and east to 

the Zuni River Valley. Certain objects 

found in Upland Mogollon 

archeological sites have been found to 

have strong resemblances with ritual 

paraphernalia that are used in 

continuing religious practices by the 

Hopi and Zuni. Some of the petroglyphs 

on the Fort Apache Indian Reservation 

have also persuaded archeologists of 

continuities between the earlier 

identified group and current-day 

Western Pueblo people. Biological 

information from site AZ P:14:1(ASM) 

supports the view that the prehistoric 

occupants of the Upland Mogollon 

region had migrated from various 

locations to the north and west of the 

region. 

Hopi and Zuni oral traditions parallel 

the archeological evidence for 

migration. Migration figures 

prominently in Hopi oral tradition, 

which refers to the ancient sites, 

pottery, stone tools, petroglyphs, and 

other artifacts left behind by the 

ancestors as ‘‘Hopi Footprints.’’ This 

complex and detailed migration history 

includes traditions that relate specific 

clans to the Mogollon region. Hopi 

cultural advisors have also identified 

medicinal and culinary plants at 

archeological sites in the region. 

According to them, knowledge about 

these plants had been passed down from 

the ancestors who inhabited these 

ancient sites. Migration is also an 

important attribute of Zuni oral 

tradition. That tradition includes 

accounts of Zuni ancestors passing 

through the Upland Mogollon region. 

The ancient villages mark the routes of 

these migrations. According to Zuni 

cultural advisors, the ancient sites were 

not abandoned. Rather, people returned 

to them from time to time, either for the 

purpose of reoccupying them or for 

religious pilgrimages—a practice that 

has continued to the present day. 

Archeologists have found ceramic 

evidence at shrines in the Upland 

Mogollon region that confirms these 

reports. Zuni cultural advisors have 

names for plants endemic to the 

Mogollon region that do not grow on the 

Zuni Reservation. They also have 

knowledge about traditional medicinal 

and ceremonial uses for these resources, 

which has been passed down to them 

from their ancestors. Furthermore, Hopi 

and Zuni cultural advisors have 

recognized that their ancestors may 

have been co-resident at some of the 

sites in this region during their ancestral 

migrations. 

There are differing points of view 

regarding the possible presence of 

Apache people in the Upland Mogollon 

region during the time that these sites 

were occupied. Some Apache traditions 

describe interactions with Ancestral 

Pueblo people during this time, but 

according to these stories, Puebloan 

people and Apache people were 

regarded as having separate identities. 

The White Mountain Apache Tribe of 

the Fort Apache Reservation, Arizona 

does not claim to be culturally affiliated 

with the human remains and associated 

funerary objects from this site. As 

reported by Welch and Ferguson (2005), 

consultations between the Pueblo of 

Acoma, New Mexico; Pueblo of Laguna, 

New Mexico; Navajo Nation, Arizona, 

New Mexico, & Utah; and the White 

Mountain Apache Tribe of the Fort 

Apache Reservation, Arizona have 

indicated that none of these Indian 

Tribes wishes to assert a cultural 

affiliation with sites on White Mountain 

Apache Tribal lands. Finally, the White 

Mountain Apache Tribe of the Fort 

Apache Reservation, Arizona supports 

the repatriation of any human remains 

and associated funerary objects from 

these sites, and it is ready to assist the 

Hopi Tribe of Arizona and Zuni Tribe of 

the Zuni Reservation, New Mexico in 

their reburial. 

Determinations Made by the U.S. 

Department of the Interior, Bureau of 

Indian Affairs 

Officials of the U.S. Department of the 

Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs have 

determined that: 

• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(3)(B), 

the 243 cultural items described above 

are reasonably believed to have been 

placed with or near individual human 

remains at the time of death or later as 

part of the death rite or ceremony and 

are believed, by a preponderance of the 

evidence, to have been removed from a 

specific burial site of a Native American 

individual. 

• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), there 

is a relationship of shared group 

identity that can be reasonably traced 

between the unassociated funerary 

objects and the Hopi Tribe of Arizona 

and the Zuni Tribe of the Zuni 

Reservation, New Mexico (hereafter 

referred to as ‘‘The Tribes’’). 

Additional Requestors and Disposition 

Lineal descendants or representatives 

of any Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian 

organization not identified in this notice 

that wish to claim these cultural items 

should submit a written request with 

information in support of the claim to 

Dr. BJ Howerton, NAGPRA Coordinator, 

Bureau of Indian Affairs, 1001 Indian 

School Road NW, Room 341, 

Albuquerque, NM 87104, telephone 

(505) 563–3013, email BJ.Howerton@

bia.gov, by April 22, 2022. After that 

date, if no additional claimants have 

come forward, transfer of control of the 

unassociated funerary objects to The 

Tribes may proceed. 

The U.S. Department of the Interior, 

Bureau of Indian Affairs, with the 

assistance of the Arizona State Museum, 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2022 / Notices 16495 

1The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

is responsible for notifying The Tribes 

that this notice has been published. 

Dated: March 17, 2022. 

Melanie O’Brien, 

Manager, National NAGPRA Program. 

[FR Doc. 2022–06129 Filed 3–22–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–52–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–539 and 731– 

TA–1280–1282 (Review)] 

Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded 

Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From 

Korea, Mexico, and Turkey 

Determination 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject five-year reviews, the 

United States International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) 

determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 

1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the 

countervailing duty order on heavy 

walled rectangular welded carbon steel 

pipes and tubes from Turkey and the 

antidumping duty orders on heavy 

walled rectangular welded carbon steel 

pipes and tubes from Korea, Mexico, 

and Turkey would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States within a reasonably foreseeable 

time. 

Background 

The Commission instituted these 

reviews on August 2, 2021 (86 FR 

41511) and determined on November 5, 

2021 that it would conduct expedited 

reviews (87 FR 7498, February 9, 2022). 

The Commission made these 

determinations pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It 

completed and filed its determinations 

in these reviews on March 17, 2022. The 

views of the Commission are contained 

in USITC Publication 5297 (March 

2022), entitled Heavy Walled 

Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes 

and Tubes from Korea, Mexico, and 

Turkey: Investigation Nos. 701–TA–539 

and 731–TA–1280–1282 (Review). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: March 17, 2022. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2022–06123 Filed 3–22–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1230] 

Certain Electric Shavers and 

Components and Accessories Thereof 

Commission Decision Finding a 

Violation of Section 337; Issuing a 

General Exclusion Order and Cease 

and Desist Orders; Terminating the 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) has 

determined to affirm the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’s’’) 

initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 

33) finding a violation of section 337 of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, in 

this investigation and has issued a 

general exclusion order and cease and 

desist orders prohibiting the 

importation of certain electric shavers 

and components and accessories 

thereof. The investigation is hereby 

terminated. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–2532. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal, telephone 

(202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

November 18, 2020, the Commission 

instituted this investigation based on a 

complaint filed by Complainant Skull 

Shaver (‘‘Skull Shaver’’) of Moorestown, 

New Jersey. 85 FR 73510–11 (Nov. 18, 

2020). The complaint alleged violations 

of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based on 

the importation into the United States, 

the sale for importation, or the sale 

within the United States after 

importation of certain electric shavers 

and components and accessories thereof 

by reason of infringement of certain 

claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,726,528 

(‘‘the ’528 patent’’) and D672,504 (‘‘the 

’504 design patent’’). Id. The 

Commission’s notice of investigation 

named the following eleven entities as 

respondents: Rayenbarny Inc. 

(‘‘Rayenbarny’’) of New York, New 

York; Bald Shaver Inc. (‘‘Bald Shaver’’) 

of Toronto, Canada; Suzhou Kaidiya 

Garments Trading Co., Ltd. (‘‘Suzhou’’) 

d.b.a. ‘‘Digimator’’ of Suzhou, China; 

Shenzhen Aiweilai Trading Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Aiweilei’’) d.b.a. ‘‘Teamyo’’ of 

Shenzhen, China; Wenzhou Wending 

Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. of Yueqing 

City, China; Shenzhen Nukun 

Technology Co., Ltd. (‘‘Nukun’’) d.b.a. 

‘‘OriHea’’ of Shenzhen, China; Yiwu 

Xingye Network Technology Co. Ltd. 

(‘‘Yiwu Xingye’’) d.b.a. ‘‘Roziapro’’ of 

Yiwu, China; Magicfly LLC (‘‘Magicfly’’) 

of Hong Kong; Yiwu City Qiaoyu 

Trading Co., Ltd. (‘‘Yiwu City’’) of 

Yiwu, China; Shenzhen Wantong 

Information Technology Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Wantong’’) d.b.a. ‘‘WTONG’’ of 

Shenzhen, China; and Shenzhen 

Junmao International Technology Co., 

Ltd. (‘‘Junmao’’) d.b.a. ‘‘Homeas’’ of 

Shenzhen, China. The notice of 

investigation also named the Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) as 

a party. Id. 

The Commission terminated 

Rayenbarny from the investigation 

because its accused product was 

actually imported by Benepuri LLC 

(‘‘Benepuri’’) of Menands, New York; 

the Commission allowed Benepuri to 

intervene as a respondent. Notice, 85 FR 

82514, 82515 (Dec. 18, 2020). The 

Commission later granted Skull Shaver’s 

motion to amend the Complaint and the 

notice of investigation to correct the 

name of Wenzhou Wending Electric 

Appliance Co., Ltd. d.b.a. ‘‘Paitree’’ as 

Wenzhou Wending Electric Appliance 

Co., Ltd. (‘‘Wenzhou’’), and to correct 

the addresses of several respondents. 

Notice, 86 FR 14645, 14645 (Mar. 17, 

2021). The Commission terminated 

Magicfly from the investigation on the 

basis of settlement. Notice at 2 (May 19, 

2021). The Commission terminated 

Nukun and Benepuri from the 

investigation on the basis of withdrawal 

of the complaint. Notice at 2 (June 21, 

2021) (Nukun); Notice at 2 (Oct. 28, 

2021) (Benepuri). All of the remaining 

respondents (i.e., all respondents other 

than Magicfly, Nukun, Benepuri and 

Rayenbarny) defaulted. See Notice at 3 

(May 21, 2021) (seven defaulting 

respondents); Notice at 2 (Dec. 9, 2021) 

(Bald Shaver defaulting). Taken 

together, the eight defaulting 

respondents are: Suzhou; Yiwu City; 

Wenzhou; Aiweilai; Junmao; Wantong; 

Yiwu Xingye; and Bald Shaver. 

On May 26, 2021, Skull Shaver filed 

a motion for summary determination of 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1