# c

( "**MARYLANDDEPART~NTOFTHEE~ONMENT** 

### 1800 Washington Boulevard. BaltimoreMD 21230 410-537-3000 • 1-800-633-6101
Martin O'Malley Governor Anthony G. Brown Lieutenant Governor Mr. Donald Welsh Regional Administrator (3RAOO) 

## u.s.Environmental Protection Agency Region III 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia PA 19103-2029 Dear

### Mr. Welsh: 

# fEB 132007 Shari T
. Wilson Acting Secretary

Thepurposeofthis letter is torequestremoval oftheMaryland SlagCompany 1980 Consent Orderfrom Maryland's StateImplementationPlan(SIP). TheConsent Order, issued on October31, 1980, provided particulatematteroffsetsfrom theMaryland SlagCompanytotheAtlantic Cement Company. TheOrder (SIP

### # 80-04) is no longernecessarybecause (1)the affected facilities are located in an attainment areafortotal suspended particulatematter, (2)theAtlantic CementCompany(now trading as LafargeNorthAmerica)repermitted theirfacility showingcompliancewiththe more stringent**~** fine particulatematter standard(PMIO), and (3)theMaryland Slag Company(nowtradingas MultiServ) has furtherreducedtheirannual particulatematteremissionsbyreducingthematerial processed from one milliontons annually tounder 100,000tons annually. Notice ofa public hearingregardingthis SIPactionwas publishedinthe MarylandRegister and the Baltimore Sun,theFrederickNewsPost,the SalisburyDailyTimes, andthe CumberlandTimesNews onNovember 13,2006. Noticeofthepublichearingwas alsopublishedin Washington Postand the DundalkEagle onNovember 9, 2006 and the St. Mary's Enterprise onNovember 10,2006. Thepublichearingfor this SIP action was held onDecember 14,2006. No one attendedthe hearing and no commentswerereceived duringthe 30-daycommentperiod. All administrative procedureswere properlyfollowed. Ifyouhave anyquestions concerningthis requestto removetheMaryland SlagCompany 1980 ConsentOrderfrom Maryland's SIP, pleasefeel free to call me at(410) 537-3084 orhave a member of your staffcall Mr. George S. Aburn, Director, AirandRadiation ManagementAdministration, at(410) 537-3255.

STW:dhr Enclosures

cc: Judith Katz George S. Aburn

### ~ R ecycledP aper 

# SZ1JtL
ShariT. Wilson· Acting Secretary

www.m d e.state
.m d

.us 

## TIY U sers

## 1-880-735-225 8 ViaMaryland Relay ServiceDepartmentoftheEnvironment

Background 

### REMOVAL OF THE MARYLAND SLAG COMPANY 

## 1980 SECRETARIAL ORDER FROM MARYLAND'S STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

The Maryland Slag Company (nowtrading as MultiServ) operates a blast furnace slag processing plant at the Bethlehem Steel Corporation's (now trading as ISG Sparrows Point) steel mill located in Sparrows Point, Baltimore County. Hot metal slag from Bethlehem Steel's blast furnace that is not processed by the Atlantic Cement Company's (now trading as Lafarge North America) granulated slag cement plant is allowed to cool before being senttothe Maryland Slag processing facility. At the slag processing facility, slag is reduced in size with a crusher and segregated into different group sizes by a screening operation. The processed slag material is used as an aggregate material in road construction and parking lots. The slag processing facility is subject tothe requirements under COMAR 26.11.06.04B(1) which prohibits the discharge offugitive particulate matterfrom an iron and steel production installation unless reasonable control methods are employed to minimize emissions. In 1980, the Atlantic Cement Company proposed to construct a new slag cement processing facility within the confines ofthe Bethlehem Steel Corporation's Sparrows Point steel mill. At the time ofthe proposed project, the Sparrows Point area was in nonattainmentfortotal suspended particulate (TSP). In orderto construct the plant, the Atlantic Cement Company was required to obtain particulate emission offsets. These offsets were obtained from the Maryland Slag Company also located atthe Sparrows Pointfacility and formalized in the October 31, 1980 Secretarial Order. The EPA announced approval ofthe offsets and formal incorporation ofthe Order into Maryland's State Implementation Plan (SIP). During this time period, the Maryland Slag Company was proceSSing over 1,000,000tons of blastfurnace slag per year. 1980 Secretarial Order Is No Longer Necessary On November 30, 2001, Lafarge North America demonstrated to the Department through a permit-to-constructfortheir granulated slag cement facility that their current operations ofthe slag cementfacility is in compliance with the more stringent PM-10 emission standards. In addition, the Sparrows Point area is now in attainmentforTSP and PM-10 emissions. Finally, Maryland Slag has reduced its emissions significantly because of a reduction in slag processing attheirfacility from 1,000,00 tons to less than 100,000 tons annually.

### IN THE MATTER OF 

# * THE MARYLAND SLAG COMPANY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS


## * "'k .,'( 

## * "'k "'le "j'( 

### * 

## * * "k 1, "'l( 

### * 

## * * "'Ie *"k -k "i'e**..,~** 

# * * "'k ,'t; '"'J" .,t, if, ..,', -/, 

## * * "It: "i'< "Ie 1( ite "k 

### CONSENT AGREEMENT (ORDER) I 

### The Maryland Slag Company (110 West Road, Baltimore, Maryland 2l204!
owns and operates slag processing plants on the premises of the Bethlehem steell Corporation, Sparrows Point, Baltimore County, Maryland. The resultant pro- 

# I duct is used in roadway surfacing and as an aggregate. Among the sources of 

# I

! 

### slag which are currently processed by Maryland Slag is slag generated by Beth- 

# I
lehem Steel's "L" Blast Furnace. The Atlantic Cement Company, P.O. Box 30, 

# I I Stamford, Connecticut, 06904, has proposed to construct a slag processing I i 

### plant on the Bethlehem Steel premises which would process the ilL" Blast Furnacei I 

### In order to accommodate the Atlan-

II 

### tic Cement plant under State and Federal air pollution control laws, Maryland slag for use in cement and other products.
Slag has agreed with Atlantic Cement and the Department of Health and Mental 

# ! I Hygiene (the "Department") to reduce its particulate emissions 

### (i.e., provide
an emissions "offset") as set forth below. f 1 

### This Consent Agreement is entered into under the Maryland Air Qualityl Act, Article 43, §690**~~.** 

### and the regulations adopted under that Act, COMAR 10plB.Ol

- 10.lB.22, specifically COMAR 10.lB.06.ll. It is also entered into under the U o 

### So Environmental Protection Agency's "Offset Policy", 44 Federal Register 3274 (January 16, 1979), as amended by 45 Federal Register 31304 (May 13, 1980), 45 Federal Register 52676, 52741 (August 7, 1980), and 45 Federal Register 59874 (September 11, 1980). The Maryland Slag Company understands that the terms of this Agreement are fully enforceable under State law, which provides for administrative remedies (see Article 43,**~69B),** 

### and a maximum civil penalty of $10,000 per day for violati0ns (see Article 43, §703). This Agreement will also be en-

! 

### forceable under the Federal Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §740l**~~.,** 

### after approval by the U o So Environmental Protection Agency as a revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan (SIP) for air quality control. Approval by that agency does not delay the effective date of this Order, however.

### Except if any provision of this Agreement is more restrictive or inconsistent with any provision of departmental air pollution regulations (COMAR 10.18.01

- 10.18.22), in which case this document is controlling, this Agreement does not waive or alter the requirement of those regulations which
I 

# I are otherwise applicable to the Company.
AGREEMENT 

### ! 

# ,ion

# reduc::onT::~a:::a::e::::o:~a::S(:::h~:::::::":n:h:::_::::::es::gemiS- I crushing and screening plants that will offset the emissions from the operation l ,' 

### of the proposed Atlantic Cement Company slag processing facility (as determined, in Air Quality Programs Document of September 30, 1980 entitled "Technical Re- 1
1 1 ,1 

### view of Permit Application

- Atlantic Cement Company" (Exhibit 1)", so as to produce an overall reduction of emissions and a net air quality benefit. The reduction of emissions from the Maryland Slag Company shall offset emissions from the new Atlantic Cement plant to the extent of 1260 pounds per day as calculated by the State of Maryland and set out in the above Exhibit 1. 

### 2. The emission reduction shall be achieved by using a chemical wetting agent in the existing water spray dust suppression systems on the aircooled and light-weight crushing plants. The wetting agent shall be utilized 

# I according to the manufacturer's instructions for dilution and application rates! in the control systems so as to achieve the appropriate effectiveness. The 

# I
control systems shall also be winterized to assure that the systems remain operational year round including during sub-freezing weather. 3. The Company shall submit permit to construct applications to the Department for the modifications to the existing control systems. The modifications may not be made until permits to construct have been issued by the Department. All modifications shall be completed and operational before the proposed Atlantic Cement Company plant becomes operational.

2 

# I "",J, " 

### 4. This Agreement is binding on all successors in interest to the Companyo Before any interest in the Company is transferred to another person, the Company shall give that person a copy of this Agreement.

I

# 1~/jlfJ 

# prog r4 William 

### M. Eichbaum Assistant Secretary for Environmental 

# 7 I 

### Date

Date**~eorge** p. 

### Ferreri Administrator, Air Quality Programs

IElTCY 

## ,-c**--Q~-1ub.~,-** 

## _______.19

### ~..::::-_



# ..**<tl~l-----** 

# __ , (,

I.·

# ~: ... '. 

# 1:.- 0 /, !h)<->/ { 

### Date'/ /

. / I

# ~_.__:---"--.....:..\.--

# ___-----(

. // .' ! //,

. /i'-'/: i " /'/, 

### Date'ttiryiand

### siar~I~~~n~

3 I

### TECHNICAL REVIEW OF PERMIT APPLICATION ATLANTIC CEMENT COMPANY

Division of Engineering Air Quality Programs September 30, 1980(1)

SUMMARY


### On April 16, 1980, the Atlantic Cement Company, Inc. submitted applications alld information to construct a new facUity to process the slag from the ItL" blast furnace of the Bethlehem Steel Corporation. Additional information necessary for technical review was requested. This information was submitted to the Department on April 30, 1980 and on July 1, 1980. The proposed facility would be located on the premises of the Bethlehem Steel Corporation at Sparrows Point, Maryland. This site is located within the area d,esignated under the Federal Clean Air Act as non-attainment with the secondary standard for particulate matter. In addition, the calculated particulate emissions f,or the proposed facUity exceeded fifty (50) tons per year. The technical review by the Division of Engineering included the following: 1. Determination of the emission limitations which specify the Lowest Achievable Emission Rate (LAER) for the new source. 2. Calculation of the expected particulate .emissions for the source (Atlantic Cement Company). 3. Calculation of the present particulate emissions from the source providing the required offset (Maryland Slag Company). 4. Calculation and technical confirmation of the proposed offset of particulate emissions. 5. Determination that the proposed new source will be in compliance with all applicable stationary source emission regulations. This report includes the particulate matter emission calculations for Atlantic Cement and Maryland Slag, the appropriate emission offset calculations, and the Department's LAER determinations.(2)


### ATLANTIC CEMENT COMPANY LAER DETERMINATIONS
The new Atlantic Cement Company facility must comply with the following determinations for the Lowest Achievable Emission Rate (LAER): Granulation Plant: The Department will accept the Thyssen process as described in the Company's application. Grinding Plant and Conveying Lines: Baghouses with 991. capture efficiency or greater are required at all pickup points and the emissions discharged to the aanosphere from each baghouse may not exceed 0.02 gr/scfd. All baghouses shall be equipped with devices to detect and signal baghouse leaks and bag breakage. Roads: All roads must be paved and regularly cleaned with a street sweeper or similar equipment. However, the Department will accept an emulsion asphalt treatment if the Company can demonstrate that this treaanent can achieve a 901. reduction in emissions as compared to emissions from unpaved roads. Barges and Shiploading: The Department requires tight fitting telescoping loading spouts with aspiration to a baghouse (with 991. capture efficiency and 0.02 gr/scfd for discharged emissions). Stockpiles: 

## £2!l: The Company must utilize a water sprinkling system on the coal stockpile. Water sprays must be used at the railroad car unloading and on the hopper loading operation. Granulated Slag: The Company must maintain a 101. free moisture content on the surface of the granulated slag stockpile to be determined using ASTM method C 566-78. Gypsum: The gypsum stockpile must be totally enclosed, such as by a building, silo, or other enclosure.(3)


### ATLANTIC CEMENT COMPANY PARTICULATE EMISSION CALCULATIONS
A. Slag Granulating Process: Process includes all operations beginning with**molte~** 

### slag from 

### "t" blast furnace into hot runners and ending with wet granulated slag loaded onto trucks. 1. Granulation System: Company's application consists of an enclosed system for hot runners, blowing boxes, cold runners, and agitatingtanks controlled by spray towers. Application represents virtually no particulate discharge to atmosphere. No particulate emissions calculated for this operation. 2. Granulated Slag from Agitating Tanks to Filter Beds: Granulated slag is in slurry form. No particulate emissions calculated. 3. Slag from Filter Beds Until Loaded onto Trucks: Company's application states that moisture content of slag is 

### reduced to about l21. in filter beds. Handling of this material should result in minimal particulate emissions. No particulate emissions calculated. B. Slag Grinding and Mixing Process: Process includes all operations beginning with the receiving of granulated slag in trucks together with receiving coal and gypsum and ending with the loading of barges with the final product. 1. Slag from Trucks, Storage, Conveyed to Dryer: Using formula in TM 

### 80-01 for stockpiles: Ty = 

### 850,000 Ts 

# =40,000

s 

# = 11. 

### (from application) Emissions 

# = (s)(0.0581 Ty 

### + 0.208 Ts)**~** 

### 365 Assume moisture content of slag and water sprays when needed will reduce emissions by 90% (from uncontrolled). Therefore, particulate emissions 

## = 16 

### Ibs./day 2. 

### Coal ,md 

### Gypsum Storage, Conveyed to Screen: Coal:



# - Ty ::: 18,000 Ts :::: 2,000

s ::::**6.5~** 

### (assumed) Assume LAER results in reduction in emissions by 75%**(Ref.-EPA-600/2-73~050,** ?::qe 6.6).(4)



### Particulate emissions .. 6 lbs./day Gypsum: Gypsum will be stored in an enclosed bin rather than an open pile. Emissions from the bin are included in Item 3.i., Baghouse (340). 3. Slag Drying, Mixing, Grinding, Conveying, and Loading:
a. Baghouse (405) Servicing Slag Dryer (Fluidized Bed Reactor): 42,000 acfm x (460 

### + 77)/(460 

### + 250)
.. 31,766 scfm 31,766 scfm x 0.02 gr./scf x 60 min./hr. x 24 hr./day x lb./7,000 gr. • 131 lbs./day b. Baghouses (510 A 

### &B) Servicing Slag Bin and Elevator: 8,000 acfm x (460 

## + 77)/(460 

## + 150)
.. 7,042 scfm 7,042 scfm x 0.02 gr./scf x 60 min./hr. x 24 hr./day x lb./7,000 gr•

.. 30 lbs./day
c. Baghouses (602 

### A 

### &B) Servicing Grinding Mill Sweep Venting: 51,200 acfm x (460 

### + 77)/(460 

### + 195)
.. 41,976 scfm 41,976 scfm x 0.02 gr./scf x 60 min./hr. x 24 hr./day x lb./7,000 gr•

.. 173 lbs.day d. Baghouses (608 

### A 

### &B) Servicing Mill Separator: 100,000 acfm x (460 

### + 77)/(460 

### + 195)
.. 81,985 scfm 81,985 scfm x 0.02 gr./scf x 60 min./hr. x 24 hr./day x Ib./7,000 gr. 

# = 337 Iba./day
e. Baghouse (640) Servicing Finish Product Conveyor, Air Slides, Elevator: 4,700 acfm x (460 

### + 77)/(460 

### + 195) 

## = 3,853 scfm 3,853 scfm x 0.02 gr./scf x 60 min./hr. x 24 hr./day x Ib./7,000 gr. = 

### 16 Ibs./day f.**Baghous~s** 

### (645 A 

### & B) 

### Servicing Finish Product Silos: 8,000 acfm x (460 

### + 77)/(460 

### + 195) = 

### 6,559 scfm 6,559 scfm 

### x 0.02 gr./scf 

### x 60 min./hr. 

### x 24 hr./day 

### x Ib./7,OOO gr. : 27 Ibs./day**~.** 

### Baghouse (709) 

### Servicing Finish Product Conveyor Loading: 

### 10,600 acfm x (460 

## + 77)/(460 

## + 175) 

## =3,964 scfm 3,964 scfm x O.02?,r./scf x 60 :nin./hr. x 24 hr./day x tb./7,OOO 

## sr.

:!! 

### 37 tba./day(5)


### h. Baghouses (713 A, B2 

### &C) Servicing Barge Loading System:

i. 

### 14,000 acfm x (460 

### + 77)/(460 

### + 150) 3 

### 12,325 scfm 12,325 scfm x 0.02 gr./scf x 60 min./hr. x 24 hr./day x lb./7,000 gr. 

## = 51 lbs./day

Total air volume a 

### 21,300 scfm 21,300 scfm x 0.02 gr./scf x 60 min./hr. x 24 hr./day x lb./7,000 gr. 

# =88 lbs./day j. 

### Fugitive Emissions from Slag Drying, Mixing, Grinding, Conveying, and Barge Loading: Assume the'uncontrolled emission factor for handling, conveying, etc. of all dry material within system (dry slag, gypsum anhydrite, coal) is 0
...7 lbs./ton (Ref.-AP-42, Mineral Products Industry). System handles: 850,000 tons/year slag 40,000 tons/year gypsum 18,000 tons/year coal Total a 

### 908,000 tons/year As part of LAER determination, the total capture efficiency of all baghouse pick-up pOints throughout the system is at least 99t. 908,000 tons/year x 0.7 lbs./ton x (1

- .99) x year/255 days Fugitive emissions 

## = 25 lbs./day G. Transport of Slag by Truck: Includes emissions from truck traffic on roads travelling from granulation plant to grinding plant. From Company's application: total 

### VMT 

## = 13.63 miles/hour Assume silt content 

# = 11.5t (S.P. sector average) Assume vehicle**sp~ed** 

## = 2S mph Assume effectiveness of asphalt emulsion applied to roads reduces emissions by 90% (References: 1. EPA-600/2-79-103 dated May 1979, 2. EPA-600/2-78-050 dated March 1978). From TM 

### 80-01: (0.0112)(11.5)(25) : 3.22 lbs./VMT 3.2.2 

### lbs./VMT x 

### 13.63 VMT/hr. x 2.4 

### :,r./day x (l

- 

# .r» Particulate emissions = 

### lOS lhs./day(6)


### D. Summary Calculations: Total daily particulate emissions 

## = 1,042 lbs./day This includes emissions from roadways, stockpiles, and process equipment.(7) 

### MARYLAND SLAG COMPANY PARTICULATE 

### MATTER CALCULATIONS
The following calculations use emission factors (AP-42) consistent with crushing, sc:reening, and conveying operations across the State. Plants operate 255 days per**y~~ar**

### • Au Air-Cooled Plant (Crushing, Screening, and Conveying Only): Assume plant handles 1,000,000 tons per year of blast furnace slag. Primary Crushing, Etc.: 1 x 

### 106 tons/year x 

### 0.1 lb./ton x 

### year/255 days. 392 lbs./operating day Secondary Crushing, Etc.: 1 x 

### 106 tons/year x 

### 0.6 lb./ton x 

### year/255 days

- 2,353 lbs./operating day Tertiary Crushing, Etc.: (501. goes through crushers) 1,000,000 tons/year x 

### 0.50 x 3.6 

### lbs./ton x 

### year/255 days 

## = 7,059 lbs./operating day Total Uncontrolled Emissions • 9,804 lbs./operating day Assume existing water spray system has an over-all efficiency of 701. in particulate suppression. Therefore, present emissions

- 2,941 lbs./operating day 

### B. Light-Weight Plant (Crushing, Screening, and Conveying Only): Assume plant handles 400,000 tons per year of blast furnace slag. Primary Crushing, Etc.: 400,000 tons/year x 0.1 lb./ton x year/255 days 

# = 157 lbs./operating day Secondary Crushing, Etc.: 400,000 tons/year x 0.6 lb./ton x year/255 days 

# =941 lbs./operating day Tertiary Crushing, Etc.: (30% goes through crushers) 400,000 tons/year x 0.30 x 3.6 lbs./ton x 

### year/255 days 

## = 1,694 Ibs./operating day Total Uncontrolled Emissions : 2,792 Ibs./operating day Assume existing water spray system has an over-all particulate suppression efficiency of 70'7 •• Therefore, ?resent**~missions** 

## = 338 lba./operating day 

### C. Total Particulate Emissions from Air-Cooled and Lisht-Wei6ht Crushing Plants**~** 

### 3,779 lba./operating day(B)



### OFFSET CALCULATIONS
A. Particulate emissions from proposed Atlantic Cement Company facility**~** 

### 1,042 lbs./operating day Reasonable Further Progress (RFP) is satisfied by a total particulate emission offset of at least 110t. Required offset emissions**~** 

### 1.1 x 1,042**~** 

### 1,146 Ibs./operating day 

### B,. Particulate emissions from Maryland Slag air-cooled and light-weight crushing plants**~** 

### 3,779 lbs./day The use of a chemical wetting agent in the existing water spray system together with winterizing the spray system will increase the particulate suppression efficiency by at least lOt. This increases the over-all efficiency to over B01.. 

### If a conservative estimate is made of an 

### BOt efficiency, the total emissions are reduced to 2,519 Ibs./day for a 

### total additional particulate emissions reduction of 1,260 Ibe./operating day. C. Conclusion: Sufficient offsets are available. Offset Ratio**~** 

### 1,260/1,042**~** 

### 1.2(9)



### SULFUR DIOXIDE EMISSIONS ATLANTIC CEMENT SLAG DRYER
COMAR 10.18.06.05C(1) limits sulfur dioxide emissions from installations constructed after February 21, 1971 to 500**parts~per-million** 

### (ppm) by volume. Slag dryer baghouse exhaust Maximum sulfur dioxide emissions S02 emissions • 57.08 lbs./hour ,. 31,766 sc'fm

,. 57.08 lbs. S02/hour

460 

## + 77/460 

## + 32

### DISCUSSION ON AMBIENT AIR QUALITY
Air Quality Control Programs performed a screening level analysis using approved mod.eling techniques to determine the effect upon ambient air quality of the proposed new Atlantic Cement Company facility and the associated emission reductions from the Maryland Slag Company facility. The modeling parameters used in the analysis are included here. The analysis basically showed that at the proposed conditions, the Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) levels on both a short-term (24-hour) and an annual basis will be lower than levels currently achieved. In additionJ since the TSP level decreases are well within normal modeling error tolerances, a more sophisticated modeling effort will be of no benefit. Air Quality Control Programs is satisfied that air quality levels in the area affected by the proposed new source will be improved by the combination of the new Atlantic Cement Company facility and the changes in the existing Maryland Slag Company facility.Muuta

..L1NG t'AKA.Mt;'ft:M.S 

### ATLANTIC CEMENT

- MARYLAND SLAG

D

A 

### 1,000 

### ft.

600 

### ft.



### FACILITY LOCATION CODE A a 

### Atlantic Cement Grinding Plant B = 

### Atlantic Cement Granulation Plant 

## c**~** 

### Atlantic Cement Barge Loading Facility 

### D

# = Maryland Slag Air-Cooled Grinding Plant E**~** 

### Maryland Slag Light-Weight Grinding Plant Atlantic Cement &nission Points "L" Blast Furnace



### COORDINATES /952,501.57


# - - /949,5057 / 952,501 / 

# U 50,5037 i951,502.57



### Facility Location Code Emissions Discharge Heights 

### &Comments 1. A 

### 837 

### Ibs/day 70 feet

- Horizonta1 

### vents 2. 8 

### 27 Ibs/day 125 feet

- Horizontal vents 3. A 24 

### Ibs/day Stockpile emissions 

### 4. C 

### 5t 

## Ibs/day 

## 50 feet

- Horizontal vents 5.**I~emaining** 

### emissions (105 

### Ibs/day) lre roadway 

### emissions

-- between 

### pOints A

### ~ 8

### ~bove7-2-



### Maryland Slag Emission Points Facility Location Code Emissions Discharge Heights**~** 

### Comments 6. 0 

### (Present) 2,941 1bs/day 15-25 ft.

- Unconfined 

### 7. E 

### (Present) 838 1bs/day 10-20 ft.

- Unconfined 8. D 

### (Proposed) 1,961 1bs/day 15-25 ft.

- Unconfined 9. E 

### (Proposed) 558 1bs/day 10-20 ft.

- UnconfinedSTATE 0 F MARY 

### l AND -:- 0 EPA RT MENT 0 F H E A L T HAN 0 MENTAL H Y G lEN E 

# MEMORANDUM )PA-' TO'-----:GIi,J.L....I;.P..&, •

### ....IFl;..le=rr:.::..=er:.;i=--

____

## From

__ s;,,:,:.-;..p.... , ....



### A;;.;;;;u.;;.s.;;.t

_______

## Dat. 8/11/80 

### Subject Atlantic Cement/Maryland Slag The purpose of this memorandum is to determine whether or not a comprehensive modeling effort needs to be performed in the evaluation of the proposed emissions trade-offs being proposed by 

### the Atlantic Cement Company and the Maryland Slag Company. A screening level analysis was performed on the present levels of particulate emissions from the Maryland Slag Company and the proposed combined operations of

. the Maryland Slag Company and the Atlantic Cement Company. The following parameters were assumed: Present Operations: Maryland Slag air cooied grinding plant

.. unconfined emissions 2,941 lbs./day 15'
..25' discharge height light weight grinding plant

- unconfined emissions 838 lbs./ day 10'-20' discharge height Eroposed Operations: Maryland Slag air cooled grinding plant

- unconfined emissions 1,961lba./day 15'-25' discharge height light weight grinding plant

- unconfined emissions 558 lbs ./day 10'-20' discharge height Atlantic Cement grinding plant

- horizontal discharge 837 lba./day

27 lbs ./day 24 lbs./day l250F 70 I 

### stack 1250

### F 125 I 

### stack stockpile emissions barge loading facility • horizontal discharge 51 lbs./dayt .... '. 

### 2 

### roadway emissions

- unconfined emissions

105 Ibs,/day to granulation plant Annual TSP Average At all sites at which we monitor TSPand at all locations where the present modeling technique estimates TSP 'levels, the levels of particulate caused by 

### the pll:'oposed operations were equal to or less than the levels caused by the present operation. Two 

### points should, however, be noted. First, size distributions were not available and this could alter the modeling results somewhat. Second, even 

### though the modeling indicated that the proposed operations should cause a decrease in ambient particulate levels, the absolute ranges of most of the decreases are within the error of most modeling techniques. Thus, a more sophisticated modeling effort would not significantly increase the accuracy of our present estimates. Short-Term (24-hour) TSP Levels Modeling at several equidistant points indicated that the proposed operations would create ambient levels of TSP less than the levels created by 

### the present operations. Again, two points should be noted. First, size distribution'of the emitted particulates would influence the dispersion characteristics of the particles. Second, due to the spatial differences between the two major points of reduction and new production of emitted particulates, it is possible that several specific points (all of which, most likely, will be over the water) may experience short-term levels that wquld be higher under the proposed system than under the old system. The genera. all:'ea as a whole, however, should experience short-term levels lower under the proposed system than under the old system. Conclusions Preliminary modeling techniques indicate that the proposed facilities should not cause an increase of TSP levels in the region, and they will probably cause a slight reduction, in the TSP levels for the region. Also, the decreases are within normal modeling tolerances and a more sophisticated modeling effort would not s:Lgnificantly add to our knowledge of the calculated reductions. SlM:

### jd- MARYLAND DEPARTMENTOFTHE ENVIRONMENT AIR & RADIATION MANAGEMENTADMINISTRATION 

### NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING The Maryland Department ofthe Environment gives notice of apublic heac:. ing concerning the removal of the Maryland Slag Company Secretarial Order from Maryland's State Implementation Plan (SIP).The SecretarialOrder, issued on October 31, 1980, provided particulate matter offsets from the Maryland Slag Companyto the AUantic CementCompany.The Order is no longer necessarybecause (1)theaffectedfacilities are located in an attainmentareaforIotal suspended particulate matter, (2) the Atlantic Cement Company (now trading as Lafarge North America) repermitted their facility shOWing compliance with the more stringent hne particulate matter standard (PM10), and (3) the Maryland Slag Company (now trading as MultiServ) has further reduced their annual particulate matter emissions by reducing the material processed from one million tons annuallyto under 100,000tons annually.

A request to remove the 1980 Maryland Slag Company Secretarial Order from the Maryland SIP will be submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for approval.

Apublic hearing onthis action will be held on December 14,2006at 10a.m. at the Department of Environment, 1800Washington Boulevard, 1st Floor Aqua Conference Room, Baltimore, Maryland 21230-1720,

Interested persons are invited to attend and express their views. Written comments may be mailed to Deborah Rabin, Regulations Coordinator, Air & Radiation Management Administration, Department of the Environment, 1800 Washington Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21230. Comments mayalso be faxed to Deborah Rabin at 410-537-4223 or submitted via email to drabin@ mde.state.md.us. Comments must be received no later than DecembEir 14, 2006 or be submitted atthe hearing. For more information, call Deborah Rabin at 410-537-3240.

Copies ofsupporting documents lorthisaction are availablefor review atthe following locations:The Air & Radiation Management Administration; regional offices ofthe Department in Cumberland and Salisbury;all local airqualitycontrol offices; and local health departments inthose counties not having separate airquality control offICeS.

Anyone needing special acconunodations atthe public hearing should contact the Departmenfs Fair Practices Office at 410-537-3964. TTY users may contact the Departmentthrough the Maryland Relay Service at 711. George (Tad) S.Abum,Jr. Director, Air • Radiation ManagementAdministration 

# CERTIFICATE OFPUBLICATION
OFFICE OF 

# DundalkEagle 4 N. 

### Center Place 

### P.O. Box 

### 8936

## ~ 

# (()/f 

# 9 Dundalk, MD 21222

# Il~ 

# , ') 20

# N.JJ**~&b:[ERTlFY.** that the annexed advertisement of

was inserted in 

## The

## Dundo,lkEagle a weekly newspaper**publi~-nd .~n** **B~ltimore** 

### County, Marr!and, once a week for ( /

## j 

## 0**,~ s,,¥c~ivA** **wee~before** the 

# /T)/I(_J**d~y** of 

# 11

# .rtUIYJhi

# v20 li).1 ; 

### that is to say, tit, same was

## msert~ctm**th~ 1~~**  of

## UUJ 

# 'lIUiNlbll**~** c!)jbly
Kimbel.**Publicatipn~~rw.**

# Wr't~L

### WE!HEREBY CERTIFY, thatthe annexed advertisementofOrder No281403 State OflidNdeAnna 

### 1800WASHINGTON 

### BLVD BALnNORI!, YO 21231 Monday November 132DOe



# ,

wupubliMedIn "THE BAL nMORESUN- adallynewspaperprinted and published Inthe**CI~** ofBaltimore on Monda,November 132001 Tfi. BaltfmoreSun

# ComPM,:'

# B~,

# Oi-ie:&:::z· Ad it 33129 Class 820' Name MD DEPT ENVIRON AIR & RADIATIO PO # NOTICE Authorized by D. RABIN Size 176 lines Account 6081123
PROOF OF PUBLICATION M0044 11/09/06

)istrict of Columbia, ss., Personally appeared before me, a Notary Public in and for the said District, Kate M. Davey well known to me to be Billing Manager of The Washington Post, a daily newspaper published in the City of Washington, District of Columbia, and making oath in due form of law that an advertisement containing the language annexed hereto was published in said newspaper on the dates mentioned in the certificate herein. I Hereby Certify that the attached advertisement was published in The Washington Post, a daily newspaper, upon the following date at a cost of $666.48, and was circulated in the Washington metropolitan area. Published 1 time. Date: Nov 9, 2006 Account 6081123**tll'I1~111** 

### A/J '"

# \~71ft:M~~ Witness my hand and official seal

# this~~ day

# ~**2od~**

# ~~~~~~~_~ ___

# !~!'~'~"_1**~**__

# ~~__ 

### -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------_._--- MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT**A~** RADIATION MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION**NO\_~E** OF PUBLIC HEARINGS The Maryland Department of the Environment gives notice of public hearings concerning proposed amendments to air quality regulations and to the Maryland State Implementation Plan (SIP). The proposed actions are briefly described below: (1) A proposal to remove a 1980 Maryland Slag Company Secretarial Order from Maryland's State Implementation Plan because it is no longer necessary. The particulate matter offsets required by the 1980 Order are achieved through process reductions and ability to meet a.more stringent fine particulate matter standard at the facilities. (2) Amendments to Regulation .01 under COMAR 26.11.02 Permits, Approvals, and Registration; and (2) Regulation .01 under CCMAR 26.11.03 Permits, Approvals, and Registration

- Title V Permits to update COMAR incorporation by reference citations to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Acid Rain Program to ensure that changes in the federal progrcim are incorporated into Maryland's regulations. (3) Amendments to Regulations .01 and .03 under COMAR 26.11.10 Control of Iron and Steel Production Installations to require operational parameters to be established as an**~nforcement** teol in lieu of visible emissions. (4) Amendments to Regulation .01 dnd Cldoption I)f r.l)W Regulation .G5-1 under**COMA~** 26.11.24 Stdge II Vapor Recovery dt G<3.so1ir.e D:'spensinq Fdcllitius to ,1llow the i\ir dnd R.idicltion Mdnd<)c:r,cmt [,dmini::.;tr,;\tion to utilize inspections of Stdge I dr.d Stage II**systo~s** by a certificd inspector under :::ONhR 26 .lO. C3. lG Under'Jround Storage Tank In:.:pection Reqllirlcm.;nts fer (',:G:T,plLu: c:'2**,J~t(~rminati.Gn** p'lrpo:3cs with t.ne r'cquircments oE CCMAR 26.:1.2,1; (5)**i\n~0n(jiTl(!r.ts** to**R(~quldtLcn:3** .. n1-.0,) '--ir:d .G7-. IJ,)**lJr,dl~r** (:Ctvli\8.**:~G.~1** ..**~6 ::<.:.nf(;r~\~_~y**  t·'J (1) 'lp,idt l :::**t_i~.<!** :_:**tdr:::::;n~** tG**~r,~-; ;>:,-:it--;~,l~**  <>Jntr):':IT.i;.,'1 ::-',;'- r**i_t'_,n~** tt) !'r·t**l(~ct** ,j i 1**r'~Ci..:nt** t.!,:,:h:r.) t**d~:-II_'n,jr..~..:nt.:3** dnd {2; l,l:id thc.! 'i,lq

... .;tc',.;n/ Edstern f"mh<lndle (HEP), Metrcpo 1it;m PldnniwJ ')qdnLzdtLr:n (M[,O) 

### to**tt\f~l** "..CJt otl)tr;drod.**r-l~Os** to m::';UCe t,h.tt2 Ad i 33129 Class 820' Name MD DEPT ENVIRON AIR & RADIATIO PO i NOTICE Authorized by D. RABIN Size 176 lines Account 6081123 ,ow designated by EPA as a nonattainment area for fine particulate**~tter** (PM2.5); and (6) Submittal of a Conformity SIP revision which**ref~ects** changes in the :onformity process that have resulted from the enactment of ;AFETEA-LU including substitution of transportation control measures lnd carbon monoxide and fine particle hotspots. The SIP revision will also lddress the newly required Washington County interagency consultation )rocedures. The full text of the regulation amendments will appear in the Maryland**~egister** on November 13, 2006.**~xcept** for the amendments related to the federal Acid Rain program, all 1ctions will be submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 1S revisions to Maryland's State Implementation Plan. Public hearings on the proposed actions will be held on December 14, 2006 at 10 a.m. at the Department of the Environment, 1800 Washington Boulevard, 1st Floor Aqua Conference Room, Baltimore, Maryland 21230-1720. Interested persons are invited to attend and express their views. Comments may be sent to Deborah Rabin, Regulations Coordinator, Air and Radiation Management Administration, Department of the Environment, 1800 Washington Boulevard, Suite 730, Baltimore, Maryland 21230-1720, or emailedtodrabin@mde.state.md.us. Comments must be received not later than December 14, 2006, or be submitted at the hearing. For more information, call Deborah Rabin at (410) 537-3240. Copies of the proposed actions and supporting documents are available for review at the following locations: The Air And Radiation Management Administration; regional offices of the Department in Cumberland and Salisbury; all local air quality control offices; and local health departments in those counties not having separate air quality control offices. Anyone needing special accommodations at the public hearing should contact the Department's Fair Practices Office at (410) 537-3964. TTY users may contact the Department through the Maryland Relay Service at 1-800-735-2258. GEORGE S. ABURN, JR. Director Air & Radiation Management Administration M0045 11/09/06

### (

1 

### . , 

# CERTIFICATE OFPUBLICATION From

# WQI! lfreilerirk News-Jost • Frederick,

## ~ID

lIlAtm..AND JEPAIITMEH1' OFnil ENVIRONMENT AIR.AAOIATIOft

MANAGEMENJ ADMINISTAATICII

. NOTICE QIFPU8UC HEAfUHGI r,e 'AD Dept. of**~he** Enloironmenl QlVt8 notice of ,;uolic**~aatiogs** concemil19 ,:;roposed iIlriendmllllta to**~.r** Q"ality rtg\!1a1IOnI and ;he**~al"lland** State Impl

... :nenlallOO Plan '.SIp). The jropoMCl actiona a... cr:elly deSClibad bef(M (1) A propoIIt Iio • iemove • 1_ Mary

...... 91:11 CompjIIIJ Secr"""" 0
... .1.,. front MIIYIIM', S'" Implemelltltiolt Plait because it

.. nlS**onQlr~** n.p.IIIII !iQl" maW olfs.. 111:" quired by ihe 1980 Ordlt I

, ,re acI1Ieved !hI'lIIKlII IItGO:' \ "sa**r~** ani ability \ to meal & more :stringent ! lin. partlGulate matter (.landaIdIIIJIefllcilillel. 1 (2) Amll'ldrllenla' Iio \ Aegulltlolt .01· Under' COllAR 21.11.01 p.,. \

## ~~~-:., 

# -=- Regul"" .01 unJ., COMAlf 2t.1t.Ol P
.... :1 11IiW.**A~_** ani, AetiatradOl'l-nae V 1'4Ifoo:. 

# I mila 10 updahl COMM i/t'. corporallOlt by'**re~** ; citatlona to ItNt U.S. £nvI..; , ronmenill ProtecllGlt:**A~enc:y** IEPA) Acid, Raltl,**~rogr8llt** to**~nsu,.** Ihal changll In !hi federll pro-, ,ram are incotpOratld IntO. ,lAarylancr.regylallonl; , 3) Amlndmen" t. Regulatloll, .01 and .OS un_ COMA" 2t.11.10 Contral of ItcIft 3IId StellProduction Inlllllll.tlollS**~o** requlr. operatlonll p.. ameterl to be e!ltabllahed IS an enforcement tool In

, :ieuorvisible emlsslOna;

,4) Am.admenttl to R.'alloft .0' and actop. ! !!on 

# 0' new. Aegulalfon ,05·1 und., COMA" I 28.11.24 Stage II Vapor ; Recovery at GalollllS

, Olspen,rn, FatUlt'" to !1,,'lW :he Air ..00 FladiatlOO**~1.Jf'J'1err:ent** ,A,jmil1illlr"

',,;I'I 10 IJI,hz. rspedi()l1. at !,',]e I**~nd** S!a'jt n sy,. : '"r:-s by a .:er.J dd ,rspo3O-

,**~,>r** ..dar COMAA

.j,• ;,;3.:Q**1...r..jer'Jr,~ur.d** o ,:::;,;e**~.Jnk** ,rs1=8Cr10A**:~.,I;'**...**,rerrljl~tl** f'Jr .:":'i1',:t:U. ; ',:iI**,~,):~rrrir;Jr,on ~.Jr·** 

....."' .-,**:1I~n ~'-a** **~,,'~IJiI'8"** '·','S ,;t ,:C'.!AA ';, :**~**

## ..: 

### Invoice #: \ \ 

## "ll

# c,J
Frederick. }ID 

# N**.~** 

## CV. 

# \:2 20

# C (C. This is to certify that the annexed 

# No 

# *

\

k

# e..... was published in 

### The Frederick .Vews-Post which was published in FrederickCounty on the following dates:

5) Amlndmlnll to AeQulal10M .01-.01 and**.a7~.O'** under COIIM 21.11.21 Conformity 10 II) update the citationl 10 the federal conformity ragulationl 10 rellect aI r.- cent federai dfIl8ndments and (2) add th. Hager- stoWflll:astem Panharidill (HEP) Melropolitan PI/Ulo ning Organization (MPO) to 1h4t iist of affected )"tPO'a 10 ensurl thai inI•• agency coneultatton pr_ / dur.. are follOwed in WaShington Counly, now , deSignated by EPA III I nonattainmenc area for 5na p.llticulate mall. iP'-42.S); ana (6) Submittal of a COltfor",", SIP revlalOft

, which ret/eel. changea In

tile contormity proceSl tl1at Ilav. restJlted from tile enactment of SAFETEA-LU including subStitution of transporta- lion control measuree and carbon monoxidl and Ilnl

, pa,,!lcte h01Spo1I. The SIP I reVision 

### WI' also addr

.. 

# I the newly required Wast.- InglOO County interagency consultallonprocedurel. The full text 01 tI1e regula- 11011 amendinenr. wit lP-**~** ill tIW MaIytaIid Reg. lstlt OIT' Nove/nb_ 13,., :led. Except lor Ihi amend-' mentl related 10 th. feQ. eral Add Rain program. all aC1IonI 'NIl be sYbnullad !O Ihl U.S.' Emtironmenllll Protection Agency ,EPA) .1S revision. to Maryland's Slat. Implementallon Plan. Public hearings on tile proposed adiotl. wIg be held an Oecemb. 14. 2006 at 10s.m. at Ihe Oepaltment 01 thl Environment, 1800 Nasilinglan Boull'lsrd, 1 $I ,=1001 Agua Conference Room, Bal!ltI\()(.. Mar;· :and21230-H20. 

## ,r 

# Nev\ \'3, ;)£)0(0

Interested petlIOI1I at.

## i~\ "ited 10 attend and ex- prHl Iheir vie_ Com- m.- may be selll 10 OebatM Rabin. Regul. liona CQotdInator, Air and' Radiation Management Administration,**De~** ment of the Environment.**~**

### aoo Washington Boul..; vard, Suite 730, 8C1ltimon1. Maryland 21230-1720, or amalled to drabinbde.stal•.**md.~I.** Commenta ml.lsl b8 re- ceived nol lat. lhan 0

.. cember 14, 2008, or ')e 5ubmilled at the haaring. For more infOl11"stion, call Deborah Aabln 31 ' (410)537,3240. Coplee of thl proposed adlonl ana. suppoltlng documenll ar., a'/ailabll for revfew at thl following locallonl: Th. Air and Ra· diation, Management Administration; regionat of. ncaa of th. Depattmenl in Cumberland, and Sal.· bury; II IocM air qualityI' control offlcet; and local, heaIIJI dl!Q4l1menli in

., tholll countf.. not having.**~=te ~**  quality control Anyone needing speclat I ' aCCOlllll1Cda\lo at IhI· public IIlIIIIng sIIGuld con-' ract !he Oepartmenr. Fall I Practlc41l Office it (410}537·39K TTY users

# t
ma, comad th4t Oepilto ment**~** IJIe Maryland Relay Sel'lriclJ .it 1·800-7'35-2258.
.

GEORG! S. ASURN, JR. Olrectof AIr & Radalloo**MaI'a~**

men!AdmIl1'strahon Novembel' 13, 2008 The Frederick

### News-Post pe

# MYaQ" (l

# QA Q:tn

### THE DAILY AND SUNDAY TIMES DELMARVA'S lARGEST NEWSPAPER 

### P.O. Box 1937 SALISBURY, MARYLAND 21802-1937 PHONE: 410-749-7171 FAX: 410-543-8736
MARYLAND DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENT AIR & RADIATION MANAGEMENTADMIN. 1800 WASHINGTON BLVD BALTIMORE, MD 21230 Dear Sir/Madame: Here is the Certification of Publication for your ad that was run 11/13. '06. Sincerely, Meghan Starke Legals ext. 220 

### (


### CERTIFICATION OF PUBLICATION

We hereby certify that the annexed: 11/13/06

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS: DECEMBER 14, 2006 @ 

### 10 A.M.
Was published 11/13; '06.

,/ 

### in THE DAILY TIMES

, I, i '

, L J : , . .{ • I 

### The Daily TimesMARYlAND DEPARTMENTOF THE ENVIRONMENT AIR

### a RADIATION MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION NOTICE Of pulUC HEARINGS The MD Dept. ofttle Environment gIVes notice of publiC hear· Ings concerning proposed amendments to air quality reg\.,latlons and to ttle Maryland state Implementation Plan (SIP). Tt:e prcposed ac7icrs arebrieflydescribedbelow: ' (1) A pi'oposaIto remove a 1980 Maryland stag Company Secretarial Ohier from Maryland's State Implementation Plan becar...se .t is no longer necessary. The particulate matter offsets required by**~e** 1980 Order are achieved ttlrough prOCeSS reductions and ability to meet a more stringent fine particulate matter standard at the facilities. (2) Amendments to RegulGtton .01 under COMAR 26.11.02 Pennill. AppfoVaII, and Reglsll'aHon; and (2) Regulation .01 under COMAR 26.11.03 PermItI, Approvall. and Registration· ntte V Pennill to update COMAR Incorporatlcn by reference cltat;cns '0 tl':e U,S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Acid Rain Program to ensure that changes In the federal program are ;r,corporated,ntQ Maryland's regulations; (3) AmendrnenII to ReguIat\onI .01 and .03 under COMAR 26.11.10 Control 01 Iron and Steel PIoductIon InstoIIatIonI to require operational parameters to be established as an enforcement reol in lieuofvisible emissions; (4) AmerIdrnenII to ReguIaIIcn .01 and adOption 01 new Regulation .05-1 under COMAI 26.11.24 Stage II Vapor Recovery at Gasoline 0IIpeNIng Fac:iIIIIeI to aHow the Air and Radiation Management Admlnlstratton to**IJtlllz~** Inspections of Stage Iand Stage II systems by a certified Inspector under COMAR 26.10.03.1Q Underground StorageTank Inspectton Requirements for compliance determination purposeswithttlerequirementsotCOMAR26,11.24: (5) ArnendrnenIIoto ReguIatIona .01-.05 and .07:.ot under COMAR 26.11.26 CQnformIty to (1) update ttle citations to the federal conformity regulations to reflect 011 recent federal amendments ond (2) add the Hagerstown/Eastem Ponhandle (HEP) Metropollton Planning Orgonlzatlon (MPO) to the list of affected MPOs to ensure that Interagency consultal1on pracedures are followed In Washington County. now designated by EPA as a nonattolnment areafarfine parHculatematter(PM2.5); and (6) Submllfal 01 a Conformity SIP revlllon which reflects changes ir, the conformity process that have resulted from ttle enactment of SAFETEA-lU Including substltut10n of transportation control**;~eos** ures and carbon monoxide and flne particle hotspots. ihe SIP revision wiH also address the newly required Washington COl;nty interagencyconsultation procedures. The fUR text of the regulatton amendments will appear in frQ Marylgnd Register on November 13.2006. Except for the amendments related to the federal Acid Rain program, all actions will be submitted to**;~"'\e** u.S. Envl;onmer.t,)1 Prc7.:ctlon Agency (EPA) as revisions ·0 Mary!cno's**S~ote** Imp!ement';Jt;c"; Plan. Public hearings on**tr,~** ::;ropcsGd (1';;.0,-,5 .'.:.: ce -',.:::.1**(;,~ ,~**  T celT'ber 14. :<'006 at**~O** c.m. ':It -I,e ;r:r...::r-r.-,.,· r::: .;- '; :;--;**~'-.T'.'-:. ~8GO**  ·,vc;r,;n'.;JTon 3CU:6VC:(l, .:: .,,:.::;: ,',::.:: :::;'
. '.>'

. I mere, Mcryland21230-1 :-20, Interested persons are irvited**~o** a;:-"lnd ard ,,·:r,;.-$ 

### ·'-.-,'r v:e'-NS. Comments may t:e sent to**S,"bc~c."i** ,;>":0:"**~'",::;'_,c:h:'-** i ,.:;: ::::;,' nator. Air and Radlatlon Managerr:ant**Acmir,ictra~len.** C."aot':r.elt ,:r :he Envlronr.snt. 1800**·,·;a~I"i.r';Fon** Scul·J'iola. S.,', 7.3!J, 

### c':.-
....':**.~,** Marylond 2:230-1720. or 2mcl'ed to ,:lr;Jt:i

....**<r,.::;}.~:,::·".·.-.::l"~** C::-,-, ments must t::e received :'let ,oter**t~an** Ccce:rt::ar**~-I,** ::':::::0.**~r** C:: : .0' mitted at the hearing, For more :r:f,:;r:-r:oticn. <»rl ::: 20CIO'-,**:~':;;C.I'::t** (410) 537·3240, Copies of the pcpcsed cc:i<:irs ur,d**:..;~;::** :lr:-.r'1::Cc:'_r;-:;r.-: are available for revle'AI at a-.e f:;'IO'Nir.'J**ccc~:cr~;** 

### T>, /l,,[ c;'·j :'cc,,::;· tlon Management Admln,strat:on; le'-:i.cr,ai c:'.ccs**':l~** ....0**:(c:o,~:;:;.-:** in C\"rr.ceriar.c ard Sal :t::ury; r:!1 :COJ! r;:r**.~",:;,,:y** ·:c,-:.·:,:,':·:·,,; :;:..**~** :ccal health**dc~crtn"ients** ,11**;~CS-3** c,:;_r.: ':5 r,)t :-':::,,'-1 .' .:c':n) c.: 0\.,0,:1'1 cor:Hol cifices. Ary,:;ne r.';E:C,r.g oJl ·cc,;**:,"1",-·:·j:;·:,-c~'** ; .•. :,-: (';!:cr;,

....,J**~r,o\**...jd cr:nrocr**~;',,::** ::;:**:;~r.** ',r'"'**~** -..;:**~ ~·'·:**  ..s :,.• '': ' -"'

... ,'''' t3i-'::'9c4. ill ',:;0'S
.. --:."

- • ',:::

# "'J'" :':::r:,j '0"1,,**:>'~/-:a** at**-:.5·;:L~a.** r:.EC'(:.E3 "",-:L:'j ",-; :**~:::·:f** :'.r x**:,)c:':;~,CF' '/::;"'~;-,'~r:"';","r** **/.;~..** ..**:7'C~.** ;L**~~.**

### ~--~---------------------------------.------------( COUNlY-WiDECIRCULATION

MDE44142 MOE/AIR 

### & RAD. MGMT ADMIN-ENT ACCTS. PAYABLE/DEBORAH RABIN 1800 WASHINGTON BLVD. BALTIMORE,MD 1200 Quince Orchard 

### Blvd. Gairhersburg, MD 20878

Phone (301) 670-2544



### RemitTo: 7IndustrialParkDrive Waldorf, Mal'Yland20602 (30I)645-9480 ISSUEDATE: 11/10/06 CUSTOMER'SORDERNO.: 1520963 ORDERED BY: DEBORAH LEGAL INVOICE 

# 068289 21230-1720 PLEASEDETACHANDRETURNWITHREMITTANCE CERTIFICATION OF PUBLICATION 

# E"RJff:1:l0 CERTIFYTHATTHE ANNEXED LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT HAS BEEN PUBLISHED INTHE



# . PRISE FOR THE NUMBER OF INSERTIONS INDICATED IN THE INVOICE BELOW.

# ~UBLlSHF!h • B

## ~/

# a Y/k.t,.:rl t



# . ill11UrlUin"U:'**!!~tii; !~Ull!·** 

# H!.Hi

# "rlj·lU"liI1j!if;Ill!!"1 u.

# rill t, I 

# II**J!ld~"** t

# t

# titchl**~!)hUl111** 

# ! 1

# I

# 1d**:!~ gJ~!** **JI~i** 

# II**~** 

# n !!1

# i lInnmt!i

# i lHi

# mOil

# llll~flfII

# iil!l!

# iiHI!m)

# it!mIiiHU!lUiTHIS**1~** 1J CEIlTIFY THAT THE ANNEXED 

### h'ctl0- 

# o-V 

# Publi<..**I+ec,(\~** WAS PUBLISHED IN THE CUMBERLANd I TlMES- E\ S A NEWSPAPER PRINTED IN THE CITY OF CUMBE NO ON THE FOLLOWING DATE: 

### NO.;evY\bf..LJ 

## /3-**~O()0;** THE TIMES AND ALLEGANIAN CO.. PUBLISHERS
BY

# ,-ilvr,O**l:~D'L52_<J** -------------- ---- ----.--------------

## r~~~.r.A~.~~:~~~::~~~~Jr~::~~~~ NOTICE01' PU8UCHEANNGS

# General Notices 1873

Notice onADACompliance , TheState ofMarylandis committed to ensuringthatindividualswith disabilities are able to fully participateinpublic 

# I meetings.Anyone planningto attend a meeting announced below whowishes to receive auxiliary aids, services, oraccorn- ! modations is invited to contact the agency representative at least 48 hours in advance, at the telephone number listed in 

## i the notice or through Maryland Relay.

ATHLETIC COMMISSION ect: Public Meeting Dat and Time: November 30, 2006,

2- p.m. Place: 00 N. Calvert St., 3rd Fl. Conf.

Rm., B timore, MD Contact: atrick Pannella (4lO) 230-

6223
Subject: Public earing Date and Time: ecember 11, 2006,

9:30a.m. - 3:30 p . Place: 500 N. Calve St., 2nd Fl. Conf.

Rm. (Centre St. Ent ce), Baltimore, MD Contact: Kecha Dunn ( 10) 230-6191 [06-23·051
Subject: Public Meeting Date andTime: December 14, 20 6, 10

a.m.-1p.m. Place: Dept. of Labor, Licensing,

Regulation, 500 N. Calvert St., 2nd Conf. Rm., Baltimore,MD Contact: George Piendak

6229 [06.23·13)

Subject: Public Meeting Date and Time: Nove

p.m. - 5:30 p.m. Place: Miller West Miller Senate Office Bldg" 11 Bl en St., Annapolis, MD Contact: Sara unter (410) 767-6211 06·23·371
blic Hearing Time: December 4, 2006, 10 a.m. 3:30 p.m. Plac • 500 N. Calvert St., 2nd Fl. Conf.

R . (Centre St. Entrance), Baltimore, MD Contact: Kecha Dunn (4lO) 230-6191 [06·23·04) OFFICE OF THE DEAF AND HAR OF HEARING/MARYLAND ADVIS COUNCIL FOR THE DEAF A HARD OF HEARING Subject: Public Meeting Date and Time: Decembe 7, 2006,

2-5p.m. Place: Hearing and S ech Agency

(RASA), 5900 Metro " Auditorium, Baltimore, MD Add'!. Info: Sign L guage Interpreters, Communica on Assisted RealTime Translatio (CART), and AlIsistive Listening evices (ALDs) will be provided. Contact: Yv

6290
Suhj ct: Public Meeting Da and Time: December 6, 2006, :30 a.m. ace: Spring Grove Hospital Ctr., Benjamin Rush Bldg., Tulip Dr., Catonsville, MD Add'i. Info: Appropriate accommodations for individuals with disabilities will be provided upon request. Please call at least 72 hours prior to the Board meeting. ontact: Alexis McCamey (410) 402-

501 106-23·06J GENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DVISORY COUNCIL Subject: blic Meeting Date an Time: December 7, 2006,

1-3p.m. Place: 653

more, MD Add'l. Info: e State Emergency

Medical Servi s Advisory Council (SEMSAC) meet regularly the first Thursdayofeach onth. Contact: Leandrea 'lliam (410) 706-

4449 EMERGENCY MEDICAL ERVICES BOARD Subject: Public Meeting Date and Time: December 1

9-11 a.m. Place: 653 W. Pratt St., Ste. 212, altimore, MD Add'!.Info: Partofthemeetingmay -

elude a closed session. The Stat Emergency ::\ledical Services Board (EMS Board) meets regularly the sec- ond Tuesday ofeach month. Contact: Leandrea Gilliam (410) 706-

4449 106·23-20J DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTIWASTE EMENTADMIN1ST rlON

DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT
- AIR AND RADIATION MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION Subject: Public Hearing DateandTime: December 14, 2006, 10

a.m. Place: DepartmentoftheEnvironment,

1800 Washington Blvd., 1st Floor AquaConf Rm., Baltimore, MD Add'" Info: The Maryland Department ofthe Environment gives notice ofa public hearing concerning the re- moval ofthe Maryland Slag Company Secretarial Order from Maryland's State Implementation Plan (SIP). The Secretarial Order, issued on October 31, 1980, provided particulate matter offsets from the Maryland Slag Companyto theAtlanticCementCompany. The Order is no longer necessary be- cause (1) the affected facilities are located in an attainment area for total suspended particulate matter, (2) the Atlantic Cement Company (now trading as Lafarge North America) repermitted their facility showing compli- ance with the more stringent fine particulate matter standard (PMI0), and (3) the Maryland Slag Company (now trading as MultiServ) has further reduced their annual particulate matter emissions by reducing the ma- terial processed from one million tons annually to under lOO,OOO tons annu- ally.

Arequest to remove the 1980 Maryland Slag Company Secretarial Order from the Maryland SIPwill be submitted to the U.s. Environmental ProtecMARYLAND REGISTER, VOL. 33, ISSUE 23 MONDAY, NOVEM6ER 13, 20061874 tionAgency (EPA) for approval.

Interested persons are invited to attend and express their views. Written comments may be mailed**~o** Debora? Rabin. Regulations Coordmator,.AIr and Radiation Management AdmmIstration, Department of the Environment, 1800 Washington Boulevard, BaltiJDore MD 21230. Comments may also be faxed to Deborah**~abin** O:t (410) 537-4223or submittedVIa e-mall to drabin@mde.state.md.us. Comments must be received not laterthan December 14, 2006 or be**submitte~** at the hearing. For more informahon, call Deborah Rabin at (410) 537-3240.

Copies**o~**the**suppo~ing** docume!1ts for this actIOn are avrulable for**~Vlew** at the following locations: The

### !U; and Radiation Management AdmInistration; regional offices of the !?epartment in Cumberland and Sahsbury; all local airqualitycontrol offices; and local health departments in those counties not having separate air qualitycontrol offices.

Anyone needing special accommodations at thepublic hearingshould con- tact the Department's Fair Practices Office at (410) 537-3964. TIY users may contact the Department through the Maryland Relay Service at 711. Contact: Deborah H. Rabin (410) 537-

4414 [06-23-28\

BOARD OF ENVIRONMENTAL SANITARIANS GENERAL NOTICES ontact; Philip H. Cogan (410) 767-

878 [06-23·091 ARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE Subject General Information Add'i. In 0: On July 7, 2006, the Departmen of**Healt~** and .Mental Hygiene issu a special !l0tIce ann.ounc- ing its des e to rescmd a notice of September ,1990, which removed six drugs fro the Maryland Drug Formulary of uivalent Drug Products. This made hese drugs nonsubstitutable. Subseq ently, the FDA**d~­** elared these drug to have genenc equivalents. Therefo ,they no longer need to continue as nsubstitutable narrow therapeutic i dex drugs in Maryland. These drugs rc: Carbamazepine Oral Tablets 200 g; Phenytoin Sodium Extended Or Capsu.les 100 mg; Valproic acid;**T~ phy~lme**  extended release; Warfarin odium; and Primidone. Effective Nove ber I, 2006 the Department will eli 'nate the Policy that prohibits substit ion ofthe above drugs. Contact: Philip H. Cogan (410) 7

5875 [06-23-101 DIVISION OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY/BOARD OF BOllER RULES Subject: PublicMeeting Date and Time: December 7, 2006, 9

a.m. Place: Laurel College Ctr., 312 M

-

shallAve., 6th Fl. Library, Laurel, Add1. Info: The Board is schedul to

discuss issues relating to boile and pressure vessel safety and m con- sider requests for variance fro regulations. Interested persons s uld call the contact person to co urn the meeting. Contact: Debbie Stone (4 [06-23-32J
Subject; Public Hea . g DateandTime: De mber 14, 2006, 10

a.m. Place: 1100 Nort Eutaw St., Rrn. 600,

Baltimore, MD Add1. Info: E and Jim's Body Shop,

Inc. has req sted a permanent vari- ance from t e Maryland Occupational Safety and ealthrequirementsfound at 29 CF 1910.107(c)(6), '»iring type approve . Electrical Wiring and equipment t subject to deposits of corn- busti e residues but located in a spra ng area as herein defined shall be 0 explosion-prooftype approved for CI s I, group D locations**ru;~** shall o erwise conform to the prOVlSlons of

bpartS ofthispart,forClass I, Diviion I, Hazardous Locations. Electr!- cal wiring. motors and other equi mentoutsideofbutwithin twenty ( feet of any spraying area. and. ot separated therefrom by partltl ns, shallnotproduce sparksundern al operating conditions and shall therwise conform to the prOVllllon of**~ub** part S ofthis partfor**C!~ss** I**i~sion** 2 Hazardous Locations. Th vanance is requested in connection 'th 8902 Audrey Ave., Baltimor.e. D**~1234.**

If you wish .to parh**~ate** In the hearing on thls appil**at~on.** p.lease give writtennotice of:ll urmtentIonto appear, not later th 5**d~y~** before the hearing, to the ommlSSloner of Labor and Indust , 1100 N. Eutaw St., Rm. 600, B imore, MD 21201. Thenotice shoul stateyourname, address, and the proximate**a~ount** of time needed fo yourpresentatIOn.You may submit ritten comments**~o** the Commissio r at or before the tIme of theheari

. Contact: TIl nnie Godsey (410) 767-2241 [06-23-381 YLAND HEALTH CARE

COMMISSION

MINORITY B INESS ENTERPRISE ADVISO**~** COMMITTEE Subject: Public Date and Time: 2006,

8;30 a.m. - 5 p.m. Place: Harry R. ghes, Dept. of

Transportation Bldg., 7201 Corporate Ctr. Dr., Richard Trai ar Conf. Rm., Hanover, MD Contact: Federick Smitl:i

1243 [06-23-39) Subject: Public Meeting Date and Time: December 20, 20 , 9

a.m. - 5 p.m. Place: 4201 Patterson Ave., Baltimo

MD Contact:

4794 [06-23-40J

MARYLAND REGISTER, VOL. 33, ISSUE 23 MONDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 2006Statementofthe Airand Radiation ManagementAdministration Departmentofthe Environment for the PublicHearing Relating to theRemoval oftheMaryland SlagCompany 1980 Secretarial Order from Maryland's StateImplementation Plan (SIP) held on December 14, 2006 Baltimore, MD 

### My name is Jim Wilkinson. I am aNatural Resources Plannerwithinthe Planning Program oftheAir and Radiation ManagementAdministration, Departmentofthe Environment. This public hearing is beingheldpursuantto the requirements of40 CFR Section 51.102 and Sections 2-301 et.seq. ofthe EnvironmentArticle, Annotated Code ofMaryland. It

### is also beingheld in conformancewiththe State Administrative ProceduresAct underthe State Government Article, beginning at Section 10-101. Notice ofthishearing appeared inthe: Maryland RegisteronNovember 13, 2006; DundalkEagle onNovember9,2006 Baltimore SunonNovember 13,2006; SaintMary's Enterprise onNovember 10,2006; CumberlandTimes-News onNovember 13,2006; FrederickNews-PostonNovember 13,2006; Salisbury DailyTimes onNovember 13, 2006; and the Washington PostonNovember9,2006. Copies ofthese notices were**submitt~d** 

### for the record. Copies ofthe proposed action and supportingdocuments were made available tothe State Clearinghouse and are also submitted at this time into the hearingrecord. Copies oftheproposed action and supporting documents were made available for public inspection atthe Air and RadiationManagementAdministration offices in Baltimore, Cumberland, and Salisbury, and at all local health departments orlocal airquality control offices. The purpose oftoday'shearing is to give the public an opportunity to comment ontheproposed removal ofthe Maryland Slag Company 1980 Secretarial Orderfrom Maryland's State ImplementationPlan. Summary 

### The Secretarial Order, issued on October 31, 1980, provided suspended particulate matter offsets from the Maryland Slag Companyto the Atlantic CementCompanybytreatingfugitive dust sources. The Order is no longernecessary because Maryland Slag'semissions have been significantlyreduced by reducing the materialsprocessedby over90 percent. TheAtlantic

1

### CementCompany (nowtrading as LafargeNorthAmerica)repermittedtheir facility and significantlyreduced emissions ofPMIO. Marylandhas no noattainment areas for PM\O. A requestto remove the 1980 Maryland SlagCompany Secretarial Orderfrom the Maryland SIP will be submittedto theU.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency (EPA) for approval. 

### Consideration ofComments The Departmentwill consider all commentsbeforerequesting the U.S. EPAto approve removal ofthe Maryland Slag Company 1980 Secretarial Orderfrom Maryland's State ImplementationPlan.

L:\AQPlanning and Monitoring\Regulation DevelopmentDivision\Hearing Materials\Hearing Statements\Hearing Stmt

- MD Slag.doc



### 2

# ORIGINAL 1



### MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 2 

### 3 Re: 

### 4 REMOVAL OF THE 5 MARYLAND SLAG COMPANY 6 1980 SECRETARIAL ORDER 7 FROM MARYLAND'S STATE 8 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 9 10 11 i\ 

### 12 The hearing in the above-referenced 13 matter commenced on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 14 at 10:24 a.m., at the Maryland Department of the 15 Environment, Aqua Room, 1800 Washington 16 Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland, 21230. 17 18 19 20 Before: D bra L. Maheux, Notary 

### Public 21 ?'"'

<_ L



### For The Record, Inc. (301) 870-8025
- www.ftrinc.net
- (800) 921-55552

1 

### A P PEA RAN C E S 2 

### 3 ON BEHALF OF THE MOE: 

### 4 DEBORAH RABIN, HEARING OFFICER 

### 5 JAMES WILKINSON, MDE 6 Maryland Department of the Environment 7 

### 1800 Washington Boulevard, Suite 730 8 

### Baltimore, Maryland 21230-1720 9 

### 10 11 

### 12 

### I N 0 E X 13 

### 14 EXHIBIT 

### PAGE 15 1 5 

### 16 17 18 

### 19 20 

### 21 22



## For The Record, Inc. (301) 870-8025 www.ftrinc.net -(800) 921-55553

1 

### PRO C E E DIN G S 2 3 HEARING OFFICER RABIN: Good morning. 4 On behalf of the Department of the Environment 

### 5 and the Air and Radiation Management 

### 6 Administration, I would like to welcome you to 7 this public hearing. 8 My name is Deborah Rabin. I am the 9 Regulations Coordinator for the Air and 10 Radiation Management Administration. I will 11 serve as hearing officer for today's hearing. 

## l 12 I would like to ask all of you in 13 attendance today to please sign in, if you 14 haven't already.done so. This will help us to 

### 15 keep an accurate record of the people who 16 participate in the hearing. Also, copies of our 17 support documents for this action and the 18 Department's hearing statement are available on 19 the table for your information. 20 This hearing concerns the propos d 21**remov~l** ot the Maryland Slag 'ompany 1980 22 

### S cretarial Order for**Maryland'~** 

### State



## For The Record, Inc. (301) 870-8025
- 

## www.ftrinc.net
- (800) 

## 921-55554



### 1 Implementation Plan. 2 

### The purpose of this hearing is to give 3 

### you the opportunity to comment on this action. 

### 4 The Opportunity for Public Comment for 5 

### this proposed action appeared in the Maryland 6 

### Register, Volume 33, 

### Issue 23, 

### Page 1873 

### on 

### 7 November 13, 

### 2006. 8 

### The hearing will proceed in the 9 

### following order. First, Mr. Jim Wilkinson will 

### 10 make a statement on behalf of the Air and 11 

### Radiation Management Administration. After Mr. 12 

### Wilkinson is finished, I will calIon any 13 

### elected official or government official who 

### 14 wants to make a statement. Then, I will call 15 upon anyone else who indicated on the sign-in 16 sheet that he or she would like to make a 17 

### statement. 18 

### When giving your statement, please corne 19 up front, identify yourself and your affiliation 20 and give your statement loudly and clearly. i"'l..re 

### 21 th re any questions? I 'tJi 11 n ," all () n**t~::-.** W i kin 

### sen .



## For The Record, Inc. (301) 870-8025
- www.ftrinc.net
- (800) 921 55555

1 

### MR. WILKINSON: My name is Jim 2 wilkinson. I am a Natural Resources Planner 3 within the Planning Program of the Air and 4 Radiation Management Administration, Department 

### 5 of the Environment. 6 This public**~earing** 

### is being held 7 pursuant to the requirements of 40 CFR Section 8 

### 51.102 and Sections 2 301 et.seq. Of the 

### 9 Environment Article, Annotated Code of Maryland. 10 It is also being held in conformance with the 11 State Administrative Procedures Act under the ! ( 

### 12 State Government Article, beginning at Section 13 10-101. 14 Notice of this hearing appeared in the 15 Maryland Register, on November 13, 2006; Dundalk 16 Eagle, on November 9, 2006; Baltimore Sun, on 17 November 13, 2006; Saint Mary's Enterprise, on 18 November 10, 2006; Cumberland Times-News, on 

### 19 Novembe r 13, 2006; Frede rick News - Pos t ,on :20 

### November 13, 2006; Salisbury Daily Times, on :21 

### Novemb e r 1 3, 2 00 6 ; 

### and the voJ

### ashi n9 

### ton Po s t, 

### en**~ <~**  

### November 9, 2006. 

### Copies of these noti es were



### For The Record, Inc (301) 

## 870-8025

- www.ftrinc.net (800) 921-55556



### 1 submitted for the record. 2 Copies of the proposed action and 3 supporting documents were made available to the 4 State Clearinghouse and are also submitted at 5 

### this time into the hearing record. Copies of 6 the proposed action and supporting documents 7 were made available for public inspection at the 8 Air and Radiation Management Administration 9 offices in Baltimore, Cumberland, and Salisbury, 10 and at all local health departments or local air 11 quality control offices. 12 The purpose of today's hearing is to 13 give the public an opportunity to comment on the 14 proposed removal of the Maryland Slag Company 15 1980 Secretarial Order from Maryland's State 16 Implementation Plan. 17 

### The Secretarial Order, issued on 18 October 31, 1980, provided suspended particulate 19 matter offsets from the Maryland Slag Company to



## o the Atlantic Cement Company by treating fugitive 21 dust sources. The Order is no longer necessary 22 because Maryland Slag's emission have been



### For The Record} Inc. (301) 870-8025
- www.ftrinc.net
- 

## (BOO) 921-55557

1 

### significantly reduced by reducing the materials 2 processed by over 90 percent. The Atlantic 3 Cement Company (now trading as Lafarge North 4 

### America) repermitted their facility and 5 significantly reduced emissions of PMI0. 6 Maryland has no noattainment areas for PMI0. 7 A request to remove the 1980 Maryland 8 Slag Company Secretarial Order from the Maryland 9 SIP will be submitted to the U.S. Environmental 10 Protection Agency (EPA) for approval. 11 The Department will consider all 

### ,( 12 comments before requesting the U.S. EPA to 13 approve removal of the Maryland Slag Company 14 1980 Secretarial Order from Maryland's State 15 Implementation Plan. 16 HEARING OFFICER RABIN: Please let the 17 record show that no one has attended this 18 hearing. We are submitting Mr. Wilkinson's 19 

### statement for the record.

(] 

### (MOE Deposition Exhibit Number 1 was 21 

### marked for identification.) 7.:2 

### HEARING OFFICER RABIN: his 'NiLl



## For The Record, Inc. (301) 870-8025
- www.ftrinc.net- (800) 921-55558

1 conclude the public hearing regarding the 2 proposed removal of the Maryland Slag Company 3 1980 Secretarial Order from Maryland's State 4 Implementation Plan. 5 Let the record reflect that it is now 6 10:26, and this hearing is officially concluded. 7 

### (Whereupon, at 10:26 p.m. the hearing 8 

### was concluded.) 9 10 11 12 13 

### 14 

### 15 16 17 18 19 20 21



### For The Record, Inc. (301) 870-8025
- www.ftrinc.nef
- (800) 921-5555

### CSRTIFICATE OF REPORTER



### I, Debra L. Maheux, do hereby certify that the foregoing proceedings were recorded by
me via stenotype and reduced to typewriting under my supervision; that I am neither counsel for, related to, nor employed by any of the parties to the action in which these proceedings
were transcribed; and further, that I am not a relative or employee of any attorney or counsel employed by the parties hereto, nor financially
or otherwise interested in the outcome of the action.

# ~.~fVI~**------------~~------------** DEBRA L. MAHEUX



## For The Record, Inc. (301) 870-8025

. www.ftrinc.net
- (800) 921-5555 9

## NO ONE ATTENDED THEPUBLIC HEARING

AND

NO COMMENTS WERERECEIVED DURING THE 30-DA Y COMMENTPERIOD