alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A1077. KURTIS LEE BROWN v. SUPERIOR COURT JUDGES OF

GEORGIA et al.

Prison inmate Kurtis Lee Brown filed this civil action on behalf of himself and

several other inmates against, among others, the Georgia Superior Court judges and

Georgia attorneys, in which he appears to claim they are guilty of “commercial

crimes” and fraud for selling court default judgments to the federal district courts as

negotiable instruments. He asks that the plaintiffs be acquitted and discharged, and

that they receive all the proceeds from these illegal sales. The trial court issued an

order denying filing based on the lack of any justiciable issue of law or fact on which

it could grant relief. Brown filed a direct appeal to the Supreme Court, which

transferred the case to us. We, however, lack jurisdiction over this direct appeal. 

Because Brown was incarcerated when he initiated this action, his appeal is

controlled by the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996. OCGA § 42-12-1 et seq.

OCGA § 42-12-8 requires that an appeal of a civil action filed by a prisoner "shall be

as provided in Code Section 5-6-35." Under OCGA § 5-6-35 (b), the party wishing

to appeal must file an application for discretionary appeal with the appropriate

appellate court. Because a prisoner has no right of direct appeal in civil cases, we

lack jurisdiction to consider a direct appeal from the trial court's order. See Jones v.

Townsend, 267 Ga. 489 (480 SE2d 24) (1997). Accordingly, this direct appeal is

hereby DISMISSED.

March 10, 2016
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

03/10/2016
----

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

| (1)    | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period                ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15                U.S.C.                78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
| (2)    | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company.                                                                                                                                         |

----
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Michael Yom, President and Chief Executive Officer of Biofield Corp. and I, Joseph Repko, Chief Financial Officer of Biofield Corp. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:  March 6, 2007 | By: | /s/ Michael Yom                      
|-------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------
|                     |     | Michael Yom                          
|                     |     | (President & Chief Executive Officer)



|Date:  March 6, 2007 | By: | /s/ Joseph Repko         
|-------------------- | --- | -------------------------
|                     |     | Joseph Repko             
|                     |     | (Chief Financial Officer)
Exhibit 35.1



|     |                        |                              
|---- | ---------------------- | -----------------------------
|LOGO |                        | Commercial Mortgage Servicing
|     | D1086-120, 12th Floor 
|     | 550 South Tryon Street
|     | Charlotte, NC 28202   
|     | 1-800-326-1334        

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2014, by and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL
MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor, and
CITIBANK N.A., as Certificate Administrator and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-GC25 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise
defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive
Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such
period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of
March 2016.



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|                                                      
|LOGO                                                  
|Daniel Bober Executive Vice President
Wells Fargo Bank



LOGO
Exhibit











PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL


November 9, 2017






Ms. Kathleen P. Leneghan




Dear Kathy:


We are pleased to appoint you the position of Interim Chief Financial Officer reporting directly to Matt Monaghan, Chairman, President and CEO. Your responsibilities as Interim Chief Financial Officer will commence effective upon the termination of employment of the current CFO.


The following represents the terms and conditions of your employment:


Employment Term and Compensation


Term
The term of this agreement shall begin on November 1, 2017 and will continue until a non-interim Chief Financial Officer commences employment with the Company.


Salary
Effective November 1, 2017, you will receive $9,000.00 per month in addition to your current monthly rate for as long as you serve as Interim Chief Financial Officer, or for a minimum of six months.  After such time, you will cease to receive the additional $9,000.00 per month.  


Provisional Bonus
Additionally, when a non-interim Chief Financial Officer commences employment, you will receive a one-time lump sum bonus equal to $9,000.00 per month for each month you performed duties as Interim Chief Financial Officer.  In the event you resign prior to the hire date of a non-interim Chief Financial Officer, you will not receive this one-time lump sum bonus.














INVACARE CORPORATION
One Invacare Way, P. O. Box 4028, Elyria, Ohio 44036-2125   USA
440-329-6000     Fax 440-366-9008     www.invacare.com












Ms. Kathleen P. Leneghan
November 9, 2017
Page 2
 


Separation Protection 


Termination Pay - If the Company terminates your employment without cause, the Company will continue to pay your salary (as Vice President & Corporate Controller), in accordance with normal payroll practice, for a period of six months.


For purposes of determining termination pay, termination by Invacare without cause shall mean termination by Invacare for any reason other than (a) death, (b) disability, (c) conduct by you which adversely affects Invacare’s business reputation or which is otherwise contrary to the best interest of Invacare and/or (d) breach by you of the terms of this letter or the Technical Information and Non-competition Agreement and conflict of interest documents signed by you.


Kathy, we are excited to have you accept this interim role.   If there are any questions regarding this offer, please contact me at (440) 329-6735.


Sincerely,


/s/ Matthew E. Monaghan


Matthew E. Monaghan
Chairman, President & CEO




To acknowledge acceptance of this offer, please sign below and return one copy to me. 






	
				
	/s/ Kathleen P. Leneghan
	 
	11/9/2017
	 

	Signature
	 
	Date
-1- 



    	 



    





    	-2- 



    	 



    





    	-3- 



    	 



    





    	-4- 



    	 



    





    	-5- 



    	 



    





    	-6- 



    	 



    





    	-7- 



    	 



    





    	-8- 



    	 



    








    	-9-
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT
TAZIA K. STAGG, Appellant,
v. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, Animal Control Division, Appellee. No. 2D22-1583 September 30, 2022 Appeal from the County Court for Hillsborough County; Daryl M. Manning, Judge. Tazia K. Stagg, pro se. Ricardo T. Cox, Senior Assistant County Attorney, Tampa, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
EXHIBIT 11

                           GATEWAY  BANCSHARES,  INC.
        CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT  RE  COMPUTATION  OF  EARNINGS  PER SHARE
                                   (unaudited)

The  following tabulation presents the calculation of basic and diluted earnings
per  common  share  for  the  three-month periods ended March 31, 2001 and 2000.


                                                       Three Months Ended
                                                     ----------------------
                                                     March 31,   March 31,
                                                        2001        2000
                                                     ----------  ----------
Basic net income                                     $  163,814  $  161,687
                                                     ==========  ==========

Basic earnings on common shares                      $  163,814  $  161,687
                                                     ==========  ==========

Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic       679,048     679,048
                                                     ==========  ==========

Basic earnings per common share                      $     0.24  $     0.24
                                                     ==========  ==========

Basic net income per common share                    $     0.24  $     0.24
                                                     ==========  ==========

Diluted net income                                   $  163,814  $  161,687
                                                     ==========  ==========

Diluted earnings on common shares                    $  163,814  $  161,687
                                                     ==========  ==========

Weighted average common shares outstanding, diluted     681,678     680,337
                                                     ==========  ==========

Diluted earnings per common share                    $     0.24  $     0.24
                                                     ==========  ==========

Diluted net income per common share                  $     0.24  $     0.24
                                                     ==========  ==========


                                      -17-
<PAGE>
Exhibit 35.1



|     |  |                                                                                                             
|---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing D1050-084, 8th Floor 401 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF
COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2014, by and among
CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as
Operating Advisor, and CITIBANK N.A., as Certificate Administrator and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-GC25 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms
used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I,
Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such
period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of
February 2018.



|                        
|------------------------
|LOGO                    
|Daniel Bober            
|Executive Vice President
|Wells Fargo Bank        



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

3 Plaintiff-Appellee,

4 v. NO. A-1-CA-36541

5 ROBERT E. JOHNSON,

6 Defendant-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY

8 Fernando R. Macias, District Judge

9 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General

10 Santa Fe, NM

11 for Appellee

12 Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender

13 Steven J. Forsberg, Assistant Public Defender

14 Albuquerque, NM 

15 for Appellant

16 MEMORANDUM OPINION

17 VANZI, Chief Judge.

18 {1} Defendant Robert E. Johnson appeals his convictions for two counts of

19 possession of a controlled substance and one count of possession of marijuana, all
2

1 contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-31-23(A) (2011), [RP 89-92] pursuant to a

2 conditional plea [RP 81-87] that reserved the right to appeal the denial of his motion

3 to suppress [RP 82]. In response to Defendant’s docketing statement, we proposed to

4 affirm. Defendant has filed a memorandum in opposition (MIO). After due

5 consideration, we are unpersuaded and therefore affirm.

6 {2} Defendant has not persuaded us in his MIO that there was an error of law or fact

7 in our proposed disposition. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in our notice of

8 proposed summary disposition and above, we affirm. See Farmers, Inc. v. Dal Mach.

9 & Fabricating, Inc., 1990-NMSC-100, ¶ 8, 111 N.M. 6, 800 P.2d 1063 (stating that

10 our appellate courts presume that the trial court is correct and, accordingly, the burden

11 is on the appellant to clearly demonstrate that the trial court erred); Hennessy v.

12 Duryea, 1998-NMCA-036, ¶ 24, 124 N.M. 754, 955 P.2d 683 (“[I]n summary

13 calendar cases, the burden is on the party opposing the proposed disposition to clearly

14 point out errors in fact or law.”).

15 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

16 __________________________________

17 LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge

18 WE CONCUR:

19 _________________________________

20 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
3

1 _________________________________

2 JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge
No. 11-804.

No. 11-941.

#### Morgan et al. *v.*Swanson et al.; and Swanson et al. *v.*Morgan et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 659 F. 3d 359.
<PAGE>



                                         EX-12
                                         Statement re: Computation of Ratios


                                                    Exhibit 12
                                                    Form 10-Q
                                                    For the Nine
                                                    Months Ended
                                                    June 30, 1999


                            Lucent Technologies Inc.
                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

                              (Dollars in Millions)
                                   (Unaudited)


                                                               For the Nine
                                                               Months Ended
                                                              June 30, 1999

Income Before Income Taxes...........................               $ 3,962

Less Interest Capitalized during
  the Period...........................................                  16
Less Undistributed Earnings of Less than 50%
  Owned Affiliates.....................................                   2

Add Fixed Charges......................................                 473

Total Earnings ........................................             $ 4,417



Fixed Charges

Total Interest Expense Including Capitalized Interest..               $ 340

Interest Portion of Rental Expense.....................                 133

    Total Fixed Charges................................               $ 473

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.....................                 9.3
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lauren D. DIAZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-11840 Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(November 22, 2017)

Colin P. McDonell, U.S. Attorney Service — Middle District of Florida, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Ali Kamalzadeh; Karla Mariel Reyes, Rosemary Cakmis, Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant

Before MARTIN, JILL PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Diaz’s plea agreement is GRANTED. *See United States v. Bushert,*997 F.2d 1343, 1350-51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); *United States v. Grinard-Henry,*399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes waiver of the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or even blatant error).
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 70 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 70

 Electing Doctor Lloyd John Ogilvie, of California, as Chaplain of the 
                         United States Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 24 (legislative day, January 10), 1995

Mr. Kempthorne (for Mr. Dole) submitted the following resolution; which 
                      was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Electing Doctor Lloyd John Ogilvie, of California, as Chaplain of the 
                         United States Senate.

    Resolved, That Doctor Lloyd John Ogilvie, of California, be, and he 
is hereby, elected Chaplain of the Senate as of March 11, 1995.
                                 <all>
```
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

The State of Texas, * From the 441st District

 Court of Midland County,

 Trial Court No. CR 38386.

Vs. No. 11-14-00210-CR * November 6, 2014

Humberto Linares Palma, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the 

appeal should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the 

appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against 

The State of Texas.