alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6222** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.

MICHAEL DEMOND OGLESBY , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. Thomas D. Schroeder , District Judge. ( 1:06

- cr
- 00348

- TDS

- 1 )

Submitted : July 21 , 2016 Decided: July 25, 2016

Before SHEDD, AGEE , and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Michael Demond Oglesby , Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Michael Francis Joseph , Assistant U nited S tates Attorney s, Randall Stuart Galyon , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee

.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael Demond Oglesby appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant

to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court

. United States v. Oglesby ,
No. 1:06

- cr
- 00348

- TDS

- 1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 26, 2016)

. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before t his court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, David M Long, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer, of Biofield Corp.
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-SSB of the Company for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: May 14, 2004           By: /s/ DAVID M. LONG
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 David M. Long, Jr., M.D., Ph.D.
                                 President and Chief Executive Officer
                                 (Principal Executive Officer)

                                       23
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Carl J. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ Carl J. JohnsonCarl J. JohnsonPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDated November 10, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<CIK> 0001007008
<NAME> VALLEY FORGE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           486,806
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                          53
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 640,226
<CASH>                                          34,759
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           2,329,323
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         123,066
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,347,624
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              2,673,385
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 128,502
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           45,029
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,500
<OTHER-SE>                                     251,415
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,347,624
<PREMIUMS>                                     232,596
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             28,238
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                            (19,051)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   5,515
<BENEFITS>                                     222,054
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     10,515
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            17,708
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,979)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,236)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,743)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        (234)
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,977)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (39.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (39.54)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
No. 11-10291.

#### Pritchard *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 165 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

  1st Session
S. RES. 165

      Commending the 60th anniversary of the Social Security Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               August 11 (legislative day, July 10), 1995

  Mr. Packwood (for himself and Mr. Moynihan) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Commending the 60th anniversary of the Social Security Act.
Whereas on August 14, 1935, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Social 
        Security Act, which represents one of the most significant legislative 
        achievements of the 20th century;
Whereas the Social Security Act represents a national commitment between the 
        American Government and the people;
Whereas Social Security is one of our Nation's most popular and effective 
        programs with a 60-year track record;
Whereas 141,000,000 persons, along with their employers, pay into the Social 
        Security system;
Whereas Social Security is an earned benefit for workers and their families when 
        a wage earner retires, becomes disabled, or dies;
Whereas over 44,000,000 persons, including 3,000,000 children, receive Social 
        Security benefits that are automatically adjusted for inflation;
Whereas over 95 percent of those age 65 and over are eligible for Social 
        Security benefits, 4 out of 5 workers have worked long enough so that 
        they could get Social Security benefits if they become severely 
        disabled, and 98 percent of today's children would receive a monthly 
        Social Security benefit if a working parent died;
Whereas Social Security benefits provide a financial base for retirement, to be 
        supplemented by private savings and pensions;
Whereas Social Security is the Nation's most successful antipoverty program, 
        saving 15,000,000 people from poverty;
Whereas Social Security is viewed by the public as one of the most important 
        Government programs and as a pillar of economic security;
Whereas Social Security benefits help to maintain the independence and dignity 
        of all who receive such benefits;
Whereas the American public has rejected cutting Social Security to reduce the 
        deficit;
Whereas Social Security is a self-financed program that in 1994 had over 
        $436,000,000,000 in reserves;
Whereas reforms of Social Security benefits historically have been made only to 
        strengthen the program's long-term integrity and solvency; and
Whereas Congress recently enacted legislation establishing the Social Security 
        Administration as an independent agency so as to strengthen its ability 
        to better serve beneficiaries: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Social Security Act is hereby commended on its 
60th anniversary.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Moises Eufelio MARTINEZ, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-2191

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Filed December 27, 2017

(D.C. No. 5:17-CR-01643-JBM-1), (D. New Mexico)

James Robert Wolfgang Braun, Office of the United States Attorney, District of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Dennis James Candelaria, Esq., Office of the Federal Public Defender, District of New Mexico, Las Cruces, NM, for Defendant-Appellant

Before BRISCOE, O’BRIEN, and MORITZ, Circuit Judges.

*571ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Per Curiam

Moisés Eufelio Martinez, Jr., pleaded guilty to a drug offense and was sentenced to 108 months in prison. He appeals that sentence even though his plea agreement included a broad waiver of his appellate rights. The government has moved to enforce the appeal waiver under *United States v. Hahn,*359 F.3d 1315 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam). Through his counsel, Mr. Martinez concedes that the waiver bars his appeal. Based on this concession and our independent review of the record, we grant the government’s motion and dismiss the appeal.

*

This panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal, *See*Fed. R. App. P, 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel, It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed, R, App. P. 32,1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1,