alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO

MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

To the 84th District Court of Hansford County, Greeting:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on March 26,

2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

In the Interest of L.G. and S.G., Children

Case Number: 07-14-00365-CV Trial Court Number: 5210

was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated March 26, 2015, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of

Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof

annexed, at the City of Amarillo on June 11, 2015.

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

FILE COPY
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 128 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 128

Recognizing and honoring the crew members of the U.S.S. Pittsburgh for 
their heroism in March 1945 rendering aid and assistance to the U.S.S. 
                         Franklin and its crew.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 28, 1997

Mr. Peterson of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. English of Pennsylvania, 
     Mr. Murtha, Mr. Doyle, and Mr. Coyne) submitted the following 
concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on National 
                                Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing and honoring the crew members of the U.S.S. Pittsburgh for 
their heroism in March 1945 rendering aid and assistance to the U.S.S. 
                         Franklin and its crew.

Whereas on March 19, 1945, the U.S.S. Franklin, as part of Task Force 58, 
        launched an attack against Japan;
Whereas the Japanese launched a defensive air attack, striking the U.S.S. 
        Franklin, killing 724 crew members and injuring 265 other crew members, 
        and setting the U.S.S. Franklin ablaze;
Whereas the U.S.S. Pittsburgh was dispatched to assist the U.S.S. Franklin and 
        the crew of this vessel performed outstanding feats of seamanship which 
        included, attaching a tow line to the flaming U.S.S. Franklin and 
        rescuing 34 crew members of the U.S.S. Franklin from turbulent waters;
Whereas the U.S.S. Pittsburgh and the U.S.S. Santa Fe defended against two 
        additional Japanese air attacks while respectively towing and escorting 
        the U.S.S. Franklin to safety;
Whereas, as a result of their actions in March 1945, the crew of the U.S.S. 
        Franklin was decorated, including awards of 2 Congressional Medals of 
        Honor, 5 Gold Stars, 22 Silver Stars, and 250 Letters of Commendation 
        and became the most decorated crew in United States Naval history;
Whereas, as a result of their actions in March 1945, the crew of the U.S.S. 
        Santa Fe received a Navy Unit Commendation; and
Whereas the crew members of the U.S.S. Pittsburgh were never collectively 
        honored or recognized for their heroism and bravery during the rescue of 
        the U.S.S. Franklin and its crew: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes and honors 
the crew members of the U.S.S. Pittsburgh for their heroism in March 
1945 rendering aid and assistance to the U.S.S. Franklin and its crew.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Oscar MELANSON, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-11532 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed January 11, 2018

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Oscar Melanson, Pro Se

Before DENNIS, SOUTHWICK, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Oscar Melanson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Melanson has filed a motion for appointment of new counsel because he wishes to pursue a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Melanson’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. *See United States v. Isgar,*739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Melanson’s motion. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED and counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein; Melanson’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cíe. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cíe. R. 47,5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>

STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          Three Months Ended
                                                              ------------------------------------------
                                                                  April 2, 1999      April 3, 1998
                                                              -------------------   ---------------
<S>                                                           <C>                        <C>

Weighted average shares outstanding                                 10,480,093         9,306,710
                                                              -------------------   ---------------
Total shares                                                        10,480,093         9,306,710
                                                              -------------------   ---------------
                                                                                                   
Net Loss                                                      $     (1,303,856)     $ (1,910,238)  
                                                              -------------------   ---------------
                                                              -------------------   ---------------

Net Loss per share:               Basic                       $          (0.12)     $      (0.21)  
                                                              -------------------   ---------------
                                                              -------------------   ---------------
                                  Diluted                     $          (0.12)     $      (0.21)  
                                                              -------------------   ---------------
                                                              -------------------   ---------------
</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-30537 Conference Calendar

JOHN R. BUEHLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RICHARD STALDER; JARED MADERIES, Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CV-1678

--------------------- August 24, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * John Buehler appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim for relief. He argues that the confiscation of his driver’s license by Louisiana State Police Officer Jared Maderies violated his due process rights. Viewing Buehler’s factual allegations in the light most favorable to him, he has failed to state a claim for relief. See Spiller v. City of Texas City, Police Dep’t , 130 F.3d 162, 164 (5th Cir. 1997).No. 98-30537 - 2 - Buehler’s driver’s license was suspended by the State of Mississippi and Officer Maderies merely acted to enforce that prior suspension in accordance with Louisiana law. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 138 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 138

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 31, 1997

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  To correct technical errors in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 2014.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 2014), to provide for 
reconciliation pursuant to subsections (b)(2) and (d) of section 105 of 
the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 1998, the 
Clerk 
of the House of Representatives shall make the following corrections:
            (1) In the amendment proposed to be added by section 
        1085(c), strike ``section 407(d)'' and insert ``paragraph (4) 
        or (7) of section 407(d)''.
            (2) Strike subparagraph (B) of section 1031(e)(2) and 
        insert the following:
                    ``(B) Treatment of amounts paid for tickets 
                purchased before october 1, 1997.--The amendments made 
                by subsection (c) shall not apply to amounts paid 
                before October 1, 1997; except that--
                            ``(i) the amendment made to section 4261(c) 
                        of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall 
                        apply to amounts paid more than 7 days after 
                        the date of the enactment of this Act for 
                        transportation beginning on or after October 1, 
                        1997, and
                            ``(ii) the amendment made to section 
                        4263(c) of such Code shall apply to the extent 
                        related to taxes imposed under the amendment 
                        made to such section 4261(c) on the amounts 
                        described in clause (i).''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 31, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.1

               STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      The undersigned, Andrew Gordon, is the President, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of Coffee Holding Co., Inc. (the "Company").

      This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
April 30, 2006 (the "Report").

      By execution of this statement, I certify that:

      A)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
            78o(d)) and

      B)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
            Report.

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that
this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Coffee Holding Co., Inc. and will be retained by Coffee Holding Co.,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


June 16, 2006                                /s/ Andrew Gordon
---------------------------------            -----------------------------------
Dated                                        Andrew Gordon
# Official Journal C 230A/20 S

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 230A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4820 September 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 230A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4820 September 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions |
| 2005/C 230A/1 | Notice of Open Competition: Head of Administration and Finance — Reference: EF 05/03 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions

2005/C 230A/1

Notice of Open Competition: Head of Administration and Finance — Reference: EF 05/03

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
----

Action brought on 23 January 2006 — Giant (China) v Council

(Case T-17/06)

(2006/C 74/55)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Giant (China) Co., Ltd (Kunshan City, China) [represented by: P. De Baere, lawyer]

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, a limited company incorporated under Chinese law, mainly produces bicycles and parts thereof, exporting to the Community. It contests Regulation 1892/2005 which terminated the partial interim review of the anti-dumping measures applicable on imports of bicycles originating in the People's Republic of China.

In support of its application, the applicant invokes first of all the same allegations of violation of Council Regulation 384/96 (‘the basic regulation’) and of Article 253 EC it had previously invoked in the context of Case T-372/05 (2).

The applicant further alleges that the contested Regulation breaches World Trade Organisation (‘WTO’) law in that it applies market economy criteria to Chinese exporters in five Member States whose anti-dumping legislation did not provide for such criteria at the time of China's accession to the WTO.

----

(1)OJ L 302, 19/11/2005, p. 22.

(2)OJ C 315, 10/12/2005, p. 17.

----
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-15-00227-CR 

HARRISON HOOD, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 

Lubbock County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 2012-471,374, Honorable Drue Farmer, Presiding 

 

October 21, 2015 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. 

Appellant, Harrison Hood, appealed his conviction for the offense of driving while 

intoxicated. Appellant was sentenced to 3 days’ confinement in the Lubbock County 

Jail. On October 14, 2015, appellant filed a Motion to Dismiss.

Because the motion meets the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 42.2(a), and this Court has not delivered its decision prior to receiving it, the 

motion is hereby granted and the appeal is dismissed. Having dismissed the appeal at 
2

appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will 

issue forthwith.

Mackey K. Hancock

 Justice

Do not publish.
**EXHIBIT ITEM32.1**

 

SECTION 906CERTIFICATION

 

The certification setforth below is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission solelyfor the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18of the United States Code.

 

November 10, 2005

 

Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr., the ChiefExecutive Officer of Northern California Bancorp, Inc. certifies:

 

a.               thatthis periodic report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

b.              thatinformation contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of NorthernCalifornia Bancorp, Inc.

 

 
|   | /s/ Charles T.  Chrietzberg, Jr. |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Charles T.  Chrietzberg, Jr.     |
|   | Chief Executive  Officer              |
|   | and President                         |

 

1

----
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**I, Anthony A. Scalese, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of QualMark Corporation (the “smallbusiness issuer”);  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC release34-47986.]c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 13, 2006       /s/ Anthony A. Scalese     Anthony A. Scalese    Chief Financial Officer &
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4038 — PAI/SSK (specialty chemicals))

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(2005/C 293/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(2)OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.

----
# Official Journal L 124/17 M

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 124 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4817 May 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 124

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4817 May 2005

---

| Contents | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Council |
| | * | Council Decision of 17 February 2005 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters | 1 |
| Convention on access to information, public participation in decision‐making and access to justice in environmental matters | 4 |
| | * | Council Decision of 3 March 2005 on the signing of the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Albania on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation | 21 |
| Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Albania on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation | 22 |
| | * | Council Decision of 3 March 2005 concerning the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation | 41 |
| Agreement between the European Community and the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation | 43 |

Contents

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

page

Council

*

Council Decision of 17 February 2005 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters

1

Convention on access to information, public participation in decision‐making and access to justice in environmental matters

4

*

Council Decision of 3 March 2005 on the signing of the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Albania on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation

21

Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Albania on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation

22

*

Council Decision of 3 March 2005 concerning the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation

41

Agreement between the European Community and the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation

43

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.