UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549


______________




FORM 10-K/A


(Amendment No. 2)


_______________





xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009





or





oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934For the transition period from _____________to ______________





JBI, INC.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Nevada

20-4924000(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

(IRS Employer Identification No.)





1783 Allanport Road


Thorold Ontario L0S 1K0


(Address of principal executive offices)





Copies of communications to:





Gregg E. Jaclin, Esq.


Anslow + Jaclin,  LLP


195 Route 9 South, Suite 204


Manalapan, New Jersey 07726


(732) 409-1212





Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (905) 384-4383





Securities to be registered under Section 12(b) of the Act: None





Securities to be registered under Section 12(g) of the Act:





Title of each class to be registered:


Common stock, par value $.001




Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.     o Yes       No x





Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. o Yes       No x





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o Noo





Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):





Large accelerated filer  o

Non-accelerated filer     o

Accelerated filer                     o

Smaller Reporting Company  x





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act. Yes o  No o





The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 30, 2010 was approximately $56 million. Solely for purposes of the foregoing calculation, all of the registrant’s directors and officers as of June 30, 2010, are deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status for this purpose does not reflect a determination that any persons are affiliates for any other purposes.





Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: As at December 10, 2010, there were 51,241,926 shares of Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share issued and outstanding.





Documents Incorporated By Reference –None





Explanatory Note





This Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A (the “Amendment”) amends the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JBI, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 31, 2010 (the “Original Filing”). We are filing this Amendment primarily to correct the accounting treatment and related disclosures of two acquisitions which were completed during 2009, and to correct the valuation of media credits acquired by the Company during 2009 through the issuance of common stock.  Additionally, we have re-audited our financials for the year ended December 31, 2008 as our former independent registered public accounting firm, Moore & Associates, Chartered, is no longer registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB).




1





JBI, Inc. 10-K/A 2009
 
 PART IItem 1. Business
3Item 1A. Risk Factors
7Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
15Item 2. Properties
15Item 3. Legal Proceedings
15Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)
15PART II
15Item 5. Market for Company's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
15Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data
17Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
17Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
23Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
23Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
43Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
44Item 9B. Other Information
45PART III
46Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
46Item 11. Executive Compensation
49Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
51Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
53Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
54PART IV
55Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
55
 2




NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS




This report on Form 10-K/A (“Report”) and the Company’s other communications and statements may contain “forward-looking statements,” including statements about the Company’s beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, estimates, projections and intentions. These statements are subject to significant risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on various factors, many of which are beyond the Company’s control. The words “may,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “target,” “goal,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements, by their nature, are subject to risks and uncertainties. The Company’s actual future results may differ materially from those set forth in the Company’s forward-looking statements. For information concerning these factors and related matters, see “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A in this Report, and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 in this Report. However, other factors besides those referenced could adversely affect the Company’s results, and you should not consider any such list of factors to be a complete set of all potential risks or uncertainties. Any forward-looking statements made by the Company herein speak as of the date of this Report. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement, except as required by law.





Unless otherwise noted, references in this registration statement to “JBI” the “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us” means JBI, Inc., a Nevada corporation.





PART I





ITEM 1. BUSINESS





General





JBI, Inc. (“JBI” or the “Company”) was originally incorporated on April 20, 2006 in the State of Nevada as 310 Holdings Inc. (“310”). 310 had no significant activity from inception through March 2009. In April 2009, John Bordynuik purchased 63% of the issued and outstanding shares of 310, and was subsequently appointed President and CEO of the Company.  On October 5, 2009, the Company changed its name to JBI, Inc.





During 2009, JBI acquired three revenue sources, and began researching opportunities for continued expansion and development.  The Company has four operating units:  Javaco, Pak-It, Data Recovery and Plastic2Oil.





Javaco


During August 2009, the Company purchased 100% of the outstanding shares of Javaco, Inc. (“Javaco”). Javaco distributes over 100 lines of third-party equipment including fiber optic transmitters and radio frequency (“RF”) connectors used in the telecommunications industry primarily in the United States and Latin America.  Javaco’s customers include telecommunications and cable providers.





Javaco operates in a very competitive environment in the distribution of fiber optic transmitters and RF connectors. Competition in Mexico and South America can come from local and international suppliers of similar technologies and products. As Javaco adds new lines of products, it faces new risks and competition associated with diversifying its product offerings.





Pak-It


During September, 2009, the Company purchased 100% of the membership interests of Pak-It, LLC (“Pak-It”).   Pak-ItTM manufactures cleaning chemicals, and owns a patent that allows for delivery of condensed cleaning chemicals in water soluble film, most often currently used in industrial cleaning operations.  All U.S. Home Depots are cleaned using Pak-It products. Pak-It expects to expand into retail markets during the third quarter of 2010.





Pak-It provides an innovative, technological approach to chemicals, both in terms of portion control solutions and product breadth that constantly seeks to improve quality and consistency.


3





Pak-It uses patented technology to deliver liquid cleaner in a water soluble sachet. Pak-It owns two patents; US Patent 6,136,776 and US Patent 6,037,319.  US Patent 6,136,776 was issued on October 24, 2000 and will remain in effect until March 18, 2019. The patent is for water-soluble packets containing liquid germicidal detergent concentrates. It also provides methods of cleaning and disinfecting, in which the packets are added to a volume of water to dissolve and form a cleaning solution, which is used to clean and disinfect a material.  US Patent 6,037,319 was issued on March 14, 2000 and will remain in effect until April 1, 2017. The patent is for water-soluble packets containing liquid cleaning concentrates. The packets are stable despite the presence of any minor amount of water in the cleaning concentrates. Also provided are methods of cleaning in which the packets are added to a volume of water to dissolve and form a cleaning solution, which is used to clean a material.  The products are fully biodegradable and much easier to ship than bulky liquid products. The user simply adds water to the container without measuring or cutting the Pak-ItTM.  Large retailers (like Home Depot and Office Depot) and many national Building Service Contractors already using the product have documented significant cost savings from shipping, training, inventory controls and space utilization.





Pak-It also produces private label liquid cleaning supplies for a variety of well known companies, including a retail marine supply company and an international company that sells Pak-It’s with its pressure washers. Pak-It also provides an operational focus on logistics that offers individual “kits” designed to meet specific cleaning requirements, delivered directly to each location, while remaining flexible toward meeting other customer needs.




Data Recovery


During June, 2009, the Company purchased certain assets of John Bordynuik, Inc. (“Data”), a Delaware corporation.  The assets acquired from Data included custom tape drives, computer hardware, servers, and a mobile data recovery container to read and transfer data from computer tapes.





The data migration business is responsible for reading old computer tapes and transcribing the data onto modern media, allowing the customer to be able to import the data onto modern computer systems.  The data migration business faces competition from industry specialists who may seek to develop 7 & 9 track computer-reading technologies to gain access to data that has not been recoverable to date.  Customers provide their tapes to the Company, who then reconditions them if necessary before extracting the data stored on them.  The Company provides the recovered data to the customer in modern file formats that can be read with current technology.  The Company can also decipher the recovered data upon request from the customer.  The Company has also developed a data management application called Swahili that allows the recovered data to be retrieved quickly and on-demand.  Historically, these services have been sold to a small number of customers but there is a significant market for these services, especially in certain data-intensive industries such as oil and gas.  This operating unit is highly dependent on CEO John Bordynuik who has dedicated the majority of his time to overseeing the development of the Company’s Plastic2Oil technology.





Plastic2Oil


In 2009, the Company began development of its Plastic2Oil technology, a proprietary process that converts waste industrial plastic into fuel through a series of chemical reactions.  The outputs of the process are gasoline and diesel fuel fractions which will be readied and certified for sale at the Company’s fuel-blending site located in Thorold, Ontario.





The renewable energy sector and recycled products sectors are highly competitive. Plastic2Oil is in the process of commercializing its processor and catalyst technologies and there is risk associated with being a new entrant into the alternative energy sector. Profitability in the Plastic2Oil business will depend largely on the access to waste plastic feedstock where prices can fluctuate significantly. Plastic2Oil faces competition from other recycling solution products for access to feedstock in addition to facing competition from the traditional refined products industry.





During February, 2010, the Company formed two Nevada corporations as wholly owned subsidiaries: Plastic2Oil Land, Inc., Plastic2Oil Marine, Inc. to operate Plastic2Oil (“P2O”) operations on land and sea, respectively.  The Company hopes to begin commercial operations of converting waste plastic to oil in the third quarter of 2010.  In addition, the Company entered into its first Area Development Agreement with AS PTO, LLC to promote licensing and P2O operations in Florida using a combination of Joint Ventures (JV’s) and Company owned sites.  In February the first license was issued to Plastic 2 Oil of Clearwater 1, LLC (a Delaware LLC) and was arranged with members Plastic2Oil Land, Inc., AS PTO, LLC and ES Resources, LLC.   We are presently negotiating an agreement with Pak-It former management team to roll out P2O in Florida.  These ongoing discussions could potentially result in further agreements covering additional geographical areas.  AS PTO, LLC, Plastic 2 Oil of Clearwater 1, LLC and ES Resources, LLC are not affiliates of the Company.




4


During February, 2010, the Company formed a wholly owned New York corporation, JBI RE #1, Inc. to secure an industrial building in Niagara Falls, NY.  This building will house the first commercial operation of the P2O entities. During February, 2010, the Company formed a wholly-owned Ontario corporation, JBI (Canada), Inc., to produce, market and sell the Pak-ItTM products in Canada.  During February, 2010, the Company formed a wholly owned Ontario corporation, JBI RE One, Inc., to purchase an industrial building in Thorold, Ontario.





In May, 2010 the Company formed a wholly-owned New York limited liability company, Plastic2Oil of NY #1, LLC, to operate the P2O operations and R&D functions at the Niagara Falls, NY facility.





The Company currently owns three P2O processing machines. The Company believes that these machines are capable of converting waste plastic to oil through a process.   One machine is a 20-ton processor intended for commercial use.  The other two machines are smaller prototypes intended for research and development purposes.  The Company intends to assemble more of these machines, which it will own and manage itself, or license them to commercial operators in the United States, Canada and elsewhere.  Through a joint venture with a third party, the Company plans to install machines intended for international use on ships that will travel overseas.  The machines have undergone extensive testing to determine whether, among other things, they satisfy air quality standards enforced by the New York Department of Environmental Conservation (“DEC”).  To date, test results indicate that the machines comply with these standards.   The Company is operating its large processor to gather data for a DEC air permit to allow full commercial production.





From March 2009 through December 2009, we tested our lab-scale design in our in-house chemical lab. We ran the P2O processor almost daily for several months gathering data from various plastic sources including: PET, PP, LPDE, HDPE, old plastic, virgin plastic, municipal solid waste, waste plastic from the automotive industry and municipalities. The fuel from the machine was tested by Intertek, an independent lab.  Fuel product from our process was also tested with our own gas chromatograph and other hardware.





In December 2009, we delivered our lab-scale processor to IsleChem, a NY state certified chemical R&D lab. From December 2009 to April 2010, IsleChem performed over 40 test runs on our lab-based machine. IsleChem still runs the lab-scaled machine to test process changes, various plastic feedstock, and other variables. IsleChem collected gas samples and measured vapour emissions at all points in the process and analyzed them. They also tested the residue composition and ran gas chromatograph tests on the fuel samples. IsleChem was able to help us identify the factors that would increase efficiency on our process and to produce a higher quality fuel than previous attempts.





In December 2009, we also constructed and tested a 1 ton processor with a continuous feed system. This processor was used to gather data and information to compare against the lab-scale machine. By running parallel tests with the 1 ton and lab-based machine, we were able to determine that our process was clean, repeatable, and scalable. IsleChem verified this in their laboratory as well.





The NYDEC reviewed the chemistry, process and emissions of our P2O processor, including IsleChem test results. The NYDEC issued JBI a temporary permit to build and operate a large processor to gather data in support of a simple air permit for commercial operation of large 20T P2O processors.





In February 2010, JBI established a P2O factory in Niagara Falls, NY.  The NYDEC visited the site during various stages of the assembly of the processor and during test runs to review operating data at the factory.





We have run various industrial plastic waste streams to test the large processor. IsleChem came to our factory often to check the processor and gather residue and gas-bag samples. IsleChem analyzed the residue, plastic chemistry, and gas samples taken from the processors work tank, water seal, gas recycle system, as well as testing our fuel output. Petrolabs tested fuel output in addition to IsleChem.





In summer 2010, Conestoga-Rovers & Associates (“CRA”), and the NYDEC were able to agree on a date to conduct a stack test. The stack test was conducted using plastics consistent with what we would be operating with (ie: non-virgin plastic). A stack test is a complete independent test of possible toxic emissions. It includes testing for particulate matter, carbon monoxide, oxides of nitrogen, carbon dioxide, oxides of sulphur and other harmful emissions. The NYDEC set up their lab trailer on August 16, 2010 and installed their test sensors in 2 positions in our stack. Conestoga-Rovers and Associates conducted a day of testing with NYDEC staff monitoring the processor and the tests. The instruments were logged by CRA equipment and staff. On September 16, 2010, CRA emailed to us the results of the tests. We released the stack test results and residue tests in a press release on September 17, 2010. We received a final formal peer-reviewed stack test report by CRA in early October 2010. The stack test report proved our processor has extremely low emissions, similar to the emissions of a natural gas furnace of comparable size, and results were consistent with our claims and testing.


5




JBI houses internally a fully equipped fuel testing lab as required in Ontario to self-certify fuels. Our lab includes:





●
2 Gas Chromatographs, one with an automated carousel


●
1 Horiba X-ray Fluorescence Sulphur-In-Oil Analyzer


●
1 Cloud and pour point analyzer


●
1 Fox Fuel Analyzer


●
1 Petrolab vapour tester





We use this equipment to continually test and monitor the fuel from our processor.





Research and Development





JBI does not use off-the-shelf-hardware and software and has the ability to design technology to recover most legacy data and most modern media. Through proprietary research and development that applies technology solutions with artificial intelligence and custom hardware, firmware and software, JBI provides the innovation necessary to be competitive in today’s market.  Research and development costs were approximately $43,486 for 2009 and $0 for 2008.




Licenses, Patents and Trademarks





Pak-ItTM uses patented technology to deliver liquid cleaner in a water soluble sachet. The products are fully biodegradable and much easier to ship than bulky liquid products. The user simply adds water to the container without measuring or cutting the Pak-ItTM.  Large retailers (like Home Depot and Office Depot) and many national Building Service Contractors already using the product have documented significant cost savings from shipping, training, inventory controls and space utilization.  JBI intends to seek patent protection for its Plastic2Oil technology but the patents have not yet been filed.





Environmental









JBI had been operating its Niagara Falls New York plant for R&D purposes under a temporary permit that was issued by the NY DEC, while awaiting the issuance of a simple air permit, which was applied for on November 10, 2010. JBI was informed on December 1, 2010 by the DEC that a solid waste permit would be required. JBI, Inc. has entered into a formal Consent Order with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) Region 9, which will allow the Company to immediately run its Platic2Oil process commercially, sell fuel, and begin construction of an additional processor at its Niagara Falls, New York P2O facility while awaiting the issuance of the formalized permits.




Employees





As of December 31, 2009, JBI and its subsidiaries have approximately 61 employees other than our CEO.  The Company also uses a broad base of experienced consultants who generally work on valued added agreements.





Regulatory Mandates




JBI, Inc. is not aware of any existing or probable government regulations that would have a material effect on our business other than the required simple air permit from the New York Department of Environmental Conservation to allow full commercial production of our P2O processor in the state of New York.




6


WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION




You are advised to read this Form 10-K/A in conjunction with other reports and documents that we file from time to time with the SEC, including, but not limited to , our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K.  You may obtain copies of these reports directly from us or from the SEC at the SEC Public Reference Room at 100 F. Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20549, and you may obtain information about obtaining access to the Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains information for electronic filers at its website http://www.sec.gov. For further discussion concerning the Company’s business, see the information included in Item 7 (Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and results of Operations) and Item 8 (Financial Statements and Supplementary Data) of this Report




ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS





Risks Relating to Our Business




In addition to the other information included in this Form 10-K/A, the following risk factors should be considered in evaluating our businesses and future prospects. These risk factors represent what we believe to be the known material risk factors with respect to us and our business. Our business, operating results, cash flows and financial condition are subject to these risks and uncertainties, any of which could cause actual results to vary materially from recent results or from anticipated future results.





We need to manage growth in operations to maximize our potential growth and achieve our expected revenues and our failure to manage growth will cause a disruption of our operations resulting in the failure to generate revenue.





In order to maximize potential growth in our current and potential markets, we believe that we must expand our marketing operations. This expansion will place a significant strain on our management and our operational, accounting, and information systems. We expect that we will need to continue to improve our financial controls, operating procedures, and management information systems. We will also need to effectively train, motivate, and manage our employees. Our failure to manage our growth could disrupt our operations and ultimately prevent us from generating the revenues we expect.





In order to achieve the above mentioned targets, the general strategies of our company are to maintain and search for hard-working employees who have innovative initiatives; on the other hand, our company will also keep a close eye on expanding opportunities.


If we need additional capital to fund our growing operations, we may not be able to obtain sufficient capital and may be forced to limit the scope of our operations.




If adequate additional financing is not available on reasonable terms, we may not be able to undertake expansion, continue our marketing efforts and we would have to modify our business plans accordingly. There is no assurance that additional financing will be available to us.




In connection with our growth strategies, we may experience increased capital needs and, accordingly, we may not have sufficient capital to fund our future operations without additional capital investments. Our capital needs will depend on numerous factors, including (i) our profitability; (ii) the release of competitive products by our competition; (iii) the level of our investment in research and development; and (iv) the amount of our capital expenditures, including acquisitions. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain capital in the future to meet our needs.





Even if we do find a source of additional capital, we may not be able to negotiate terms and conditions for receiving the additional capital that are acceptable to us. Any future capital investments could dilute or otherwise materially and adversely affect the holdings or rights of our existing shareholders. In addition, new equity or convertible debt securities issued by us to obtain financing could have rights, preferences and privileges senior to our common stock.


7


We cannot give you any assurance that any additional financing will be available to us, or if available, will be on terms favorable to us.




Need for additional employees.





The Company’s future success also depends upon its continuing ability to attract and retain highly qualified personnel. Expansion of the Company’s business and the management and operation of the Company will require additional managers and employees with industry experience, and the success of the Company will be highly dependent on the Company’s ability to attract and retain skilled management personnel and other employees. Competition for such personnel is intense. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to attract or retain highly qualified personnel. Competition for skilled personnel in our industry is significant. This competition may make it more difficult and expensive to attract, hire and retain qualified managers and employees. The Company’s inability to attract skilled management personnel and other employees as needed could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition. The Company’s arrangement with its current employees is at will, meaning its employees may voluntarily terminate their employment at any time. The Company anticipates that the use of stock options, restricted stock grants, stock appreciation rights, and phantom stock awards will be valuable in attracting and retaining qualified personnel. However, the effects of such plan cannot be certain.


8


Our future success is dependent, in part, on the performance and continued service of our officers.





We are presently dependent to a great extent upon the experience, abilities and continued services of John Bordynuik.  The loss of services of Mr. Bordynuik could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operation.





Changes in government regulations and laws affecting the IT industry, including accounting principles and interpretations and the taxation of domestic and foreign operations, could adversely affect our results of operations.





Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and new SEC regulations, are creating uncertainty for companies such as ours. These new or changed laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations which, in many instances, is due to their lack of specificity. As a result, the application of these new standards and regulations in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. We are committed to maintaining high standards of corporate governance and public disclosure. As a result, our efforts to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards have resulted in, and are likely to continue to result in, increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. In particular, our efforts to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the related regulations regarding our required assessment of our internal controls over financial reporting and our independent auditors’ audit of that assessment has required the commitment of significant internal, financial and managerial resources.




The Financial Accounting Standards Board, SEC or other accounting rulemaking authorities may issue new accounting rules or standards that are different than those that we presently apply to our financial results. Such new accounting rules or standards could require significant changes from the way we currently report our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.




U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been the subject of frequent interpretations. As a result of the enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the review of accounting policies by the SEC as well as by national and international accounting standards bodies, the frequency of future accounting policy changes may accelerate. Such future changes in financial accounting standards may have a significant effect on our reported results of operations, including results of transactions entered into before the effective date of the changes.




We are subject to income taxes in the United States. Our provision for income taxes and our tax liability in the future could be adversely affected by numerous factors including, but not limited to, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, and changes in tax laws, regulations, accounting principles or interpretations thereof, which could adversely impact our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows in future periods.




We may not be able to obtain necessary licenses, rights and permits required to develop or operate our business, and we may encounter environmental or occupational, safety and health conditions or requirements that would adversely affect our business.





The Company requires a permit from the DEC allowing commercial operation of the P2O processing machines in New York. The Company believes that in the near future, it will obtain a permit from the DEC allowing commercial operation of the machines in New York; however, there is no assurance that this permit will be obtained, or that the machines will comply with other state or federal or foreign or international environmental or occupational, safety and health regulations. If required permits are not obtained or our P2O machines do not meet environmental or occupational, safety and health regulations, our operating results may be adversely affected.





We may experience delays in the commercial operations of our P2O machines and there is no assurance that they can be operated profitably.





The Company hopes to begin commercial operations of converting waste plastic to oil in the third quarter of 2010; however, if commercial production is delayed or we fail to achieve commercial operation of our P2O machines our operating results will be materially adversely affected.   The Company believes that its P2O machines are capable of converting waste plastic to oil.  Although the Company believes that these machines are commercially feasible, there is no assurance that they can be operated profitably on a large scale at a wide variety of locations, including oceangoing ships.


9





Our P2O processing machine technology is not patent protected.





The Company has not sought patent protection for its P2O processing technology.  However, we intend to do so in the near future.  A lack of patent protection could have a material adverse effect on our ability to gain a competitive advantage for our machines and may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, especially on future sales or licensing of our machines.





Our future success is dependent upon our ability to protect our intellectual property.





The Company may not be able to protect unauthorized use of its intellectual property and take appropriate steps to enforce its rights.  Although management does not believe that its services infringe on the intellectual rights of others, there is no assurance that the Company may not be the target of infringement or other claims.  Such claims, even if not true, could result in significant legal and other associated costs and may be a distraction to management.  We plan to rely on a combination of copyright, trade secret, trademark laws and non-disclosure and other contractual provisions to protect our proprietary rights.  Because the policing of intellectual and intangible rights may be difficult and the ideas and other aspects underlying our business model may not in all cases be protectable under intellectual property laws, there can be no assurance that we can prevent competitors from marketing the same or similar products and services.





Product liability claims against us could result in adverse publicity and potentially significant monetary damages.





As with other producers of cleaning agents, we are also exposed to risks associated with product liability claims, if the use of our products results in injury or illness. We cannot predict what impact such product liability claims or resulting negative publicity would have on our business or on our brand image. The successful assertion of product liability claims against us could result in potentially significant monetary damages, diversion of management resources and require us to make significant payments and incur substantial legal expenses, although we do carry product liability insurance for potential product liability claims.   Even if a product liability claim is not successfully pursued to judgment by a claimant, we may still incur substantial legal expenses defending against such a claim. Finally, serious product quality concerns could result in governmental action against us, which, among other things, could result in the suspension of production or distribution of our products, loss of certain licenses, or other governmental penalties.





Control of oil and gas reserves by state-owned oil companies may impact the demand for our Plastic2Oil services and create additional risks in our operations.





Much of the world’s oil and gas reserves are controlled by state-owned oil companies. State-owned oil companies may require their contractors to meet local content requirements or other local standards, such as joint ventures, that could be difficult or undesirable for the Company to meet. The failure of our planned P2O to meet the local content requirements and other local standards may adversely impact the Company’s operations in those countries.





In addition, many state-owned oil companies may require integrated contracts or turn-key contracts that could require the Company to provide services outside its core business.





Growth in our revenues and earnings depends on our ability to successfully assimilate our new businesses.





We have recently acquired several new businesses and cannot guarantee that we will be able to successfully assimilate our new businesses in the future. Moreover, acquisitions involve a number of risks, including:





●          Integrating the operations and personnel of the acquired businesses;


●          Operating in new markets with which we are not familiar;


●          Incurring unforeseen liabilities at acquired businesses;


●          Disruption to our existing business;


●          Failure to retain key personnel of the acquired businesses;


●          Impairment of relationships with employees, manufacturers and customers; and


●          Incorrectly valuing acquired entities.


10





In addition, integrating acquired businesses into our existing mix of businesses may result in substantial costs, diversion of our management resources or other operational or financial problems. Unforeseen expenses, difficulties and delays frequently encountered in connection with the integration of acquired entities and the rapid expansion of operations could inhibit our growth, result in our failure to achieve acquisition synergies and require us to focus resources on integration rather than other more profitable areas. Acquired entities may subject us to unforeseen liabilities that we did not detect prior to completing the acquisition or liabilities that turn out to be greater than those we had expected. These liabilities may include liabilities that arise from non-compliance with environmental laws by prior owners for which we, as a successor owner, will be responsible.





Volatility in refined product margins could materially affect our Plastic2Oil business and operating results





Plastic2Oil operating results will be dependent to a large extent upon the relationship for what we pay for plastic feedstock and the prices at which we are able to sell our end products. Volatility in the pricing of feedstock as well as the supply and demand for commodities could have a significant impact on this relationship.





Our inability to obtain adequate supplies of plastic feedstock could affect our business and future operating results in a materially adverse way.





We will meet our plastic supply through purchases and agreements with third party suppliers. It is possible that an adequate supply of plastic feedstock may not be available to our processors to meet daily processing requirements.




Our business may be adversely affected by the global economic downturn and the continuing uncertainties in the financial markets.




The global economy is currently in a pronounced economic downturn. Global financial markets are continuing to experience disruptions, including severely diminished liquidity and credit availability, declines in consumer confidence, declines in economic growth, increases in unemployment rates, and uncertainty about economic stability. Given these uncertainties, there is no assurance that there will not be further deterioration in the global economy and the global financial markets. We are unable to predict the likely duration and severity of the current global economic downturn or disruptions in the financial markets. If economic conditions deteriorate further, our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.




Although we believe we have adequate liquidity and capital resources to fund our operations internally, in light of current market conditions, our inability to access the capital markets on favorable terms, or at all, may adversely affect our financial performance. The inability to obtain adequate financing from debt or capital sources could force us to self-fund strategic initiatives or even forgo certain opportunities, which in turn could potentially harm our performance.





We may have difficulty attracting and holding outside Board members and this may affect the quality of our management





The directors and management of publicly traded corporations are increasingly concerned with the extent of their personal exposure to lawsuits and shareholder claims, as well as governmental and creditor claims which may be made against them in connection with their positions with publicly-held companies. Outside directors are becoming increasingly concerned with the availability of directors and officers’ liability insurance to pay on a timely basis the costs incurred in defending shareholder claims. Directors and officers liability insurance has become much more expensive and difficult to obtain than it had been in the past. It has become increasingly more difficult for small companies like us to attract and retain qualified outside directors to serve on its Board.


11




We have a history of net losses, and may not be profitable in the future




We have incurred net losses for each of the last three fiscal years. We cannot assure you that we will be profitable in the future. Even if we achieve profitability, we may experience significant fluctuations in our revenues and we may incur net losses from period to period. The impact of the foregoing may cause our operating results to be below the expectations of securities analysts and investors, which may result in a decrease in the market value of our common stock.




The possibility of Goodwill impairments exists




We evaluate the recoverability, annually or more frequently if impairment indicators arise, as required, of the goodwill carried on our financial statements as an asset. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment by applying a fair-value to the reporting unit level, which is the same as the business segment level. A Goodwill impairment loss will be reported for any goodwill impaired. Consequently an impairment of goodwill could have a significant adverse effect on our financial results.




Our inventories may become obsolete




The life cycles of some of our products depend heavily upon the life cycles of the end products into which these products are designed. Products with short life cycles require us to manage closely our production and inventory levels. Inventory may also become obsolete because of adverse changes in end-market demand. The life cycles for electronic components have been shortening over time at an accelerated pace. We may be adversely affected in the future by obsolete or excess inventories which may result from unanticipated changes in the estimated total demand for our products or the estimated life cycles of the end products into which our products are designed.





Risks Associated with Our Shares of Common Stock





Our investors may lose their entire investment in our securities




An investment in our securities is speculative and the price of our securities has been and will continue to be volatile.  Only investors who are experienced in high risk investments and who can afford to lose their entire investment should consider an investment in our securities.





If we fail to establish and maintain an effective system of internal control, we may not be able to report our financial results accurately or to prevent fraud.  Any inability to report and file our financial results accurately and timely could harm our reputation and adversely impact the trading price of our common stock.





Effective internal control is necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and prevent fraud.  If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, we may not be able to manage our business as effectively as we would if an effective control environment existed, and our business and reputation with investors may be harmed.  As a result, our small size and any current internal control deficiencies may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operation and access to capital.  We have not performed an in-depth analysis to determine if in the past un-discovered failures of internal controls exist, and may in the future discover areas of our internal control that need improvement.





Our common stock is quoted on the Pink OTC Markets OTCQX US tier which may have an unfavorable impact on our stock price and liquidity.




Our common stock is quoted on the Pink OTC Markets OTCQX US tier. The OTCQX is not a stock exchange, stock market or regulated market. Pink OTC Markets is not a securities regulator or self-regulatory organization.  The OTCQX is a significantly more limited market than the New York Stock Exchange or NASDAQ system.  The quotation of our shares on the OTCQX may result in a less liquid market available for existing and potential stockholders to trade shares of our common stock, could depress the trading price of our common stock and could have a long-term adverse impact on our ability to raise capital in the future.


12


Our common stock is subject to price volatility unrelated to our operations.





The market price of our Common Stock could fluctuate substantially due to a variety of factors, including market perception of our ability to achieve our planned growth, quarterly operating results of other companies in the same industry, trading volume in our Common Stock, changes in general conditions in the economy and the financial markets or other developments affecting our competitors or us. In addition, the stock market is subject to extreme price and volume fluctuations. This volatility has had a significant effect on the market price of securities issued by many companies for reasons unrelated to their operating performance and could have the same effect on our Common Stock.





Our common stock may be classified as a “penny stock” as that term is generally defined in the securities exchange act of 1934 to mean equity securities with a price of less than $5.00. As such our common stock would be subject to rules that impose sales practice and disclosure requirements on broker-dealers who engage in certain transactions involving a penny stock.




We may be subject to the penny stock rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission that require brokers to provide extensive disclosure to its customers prior to executing trades in penny stocks. These disclosure requirements may cause a reduction in the trading activity of our Common Stock, which in all likelihood would make it difficult for our stockholders to sell their securities.




Rule 3a51-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 establishes the definition of a "penny stock," for purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a minimum bid price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to a limited number of exceptions which are not available to us. This classification would severely and adversely affect any market liquidity for our Common Stock.




For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the penny stock rules require that a broker or dealer approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks and the broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased.  In order to approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must obtain financial information and investment experience and objectives of the person and make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and that that person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.




The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prepared by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form, sets forth:





● The basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination, and


●  That the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction.




Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and commission payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.




Because of these regulations, broker-dealers may not wish to engage in the above-referenced necessary paperwork and disclosures and/or may encounter difficulties in their attempt to sell shares of our Common Stock, which may affect the ability of selling shareholders or other holders to sell their shares in any secondary market and have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in any secondary market. These additional sales practice and disclosure requirements could impede the sale of our common stock, if and when our common stock becomes publicly traded. In addition, the liquidity for our common stock may decrease, with a corresponding decrease in the price of our common stock. Our Common Stock, in all probability, will be subject to such penny stock rules for the foreseeable future and our shareholders will, in all likelihood, find it difficult to sell their common stock.


13


Listing Our Stock on Markets Other than the OTCQX could be costly for us




Our common stock is currently quoted and trades on the OTCQX in the United States. The OTCQX is operated by Pink OTC Markets, Inc.. In the future, we may file an application to be quoted on the NASDAQ Stock Exchange or another national securities exchange (collectively, an “Exchange”). Unlike the OTCQX, every Exchange has corporate governance and other public interest standards, which we will have to meet. Such standards and regulations may restrict our capital raising or other activities by requiring stockholder approval for certain issuances of stock, for certain acquisitions, and for the adoption of stock option or stock purchase plans.





The Exchange will require that a majority of the members of our Board of Directors be independent directors as defined by the Exchange. The independent directors must have regularly scheduled meetings at which only independent directors are present. Compensation of our chief executive officer must be determined, or recommended to the Board of Directors for determination, either by (i) a majority of the independent directors, or (ii) a compensation committee comprised solely of independent directors, and the chief executive officer cannot be present during voting or deliberations. Compensation of our other executive officers must be determined, or recommended to the Board of Directors either by (i) a majority of the independent directors, or (ii) a compensation committee comprised solely of independent directors. Director nominees must either be selected, or recommended for selection by the Board of Directors either by (i) a majority of the independent directors, or (ii) a nominations committee comprised solely of independent directors. The nominations process must be set forth in a formal written charter or a Board of Directors’ resolution.





In addition, the audit committee will have to be composed of at least three (3) members, all of whom are independent as defined by the Exchange and under SEC Rule 10A-3(c), and who have not participated in the preparation of the financial statements of us or any subsidiary of us during the past three (3) years. One member of the audit committee must have specified employment experience in finance or accounting. Accordingly, we would have to appoint three independent directors to serve on our audit committee and one of those audit committees members would need the required experience in finance and accounting.





We currently meet some, but not all of these requirements. Our compensation and audit committees meet these requirements.




We do not expect to pay dividends




We intend to invest all available funds to finance our growth. Therefore our stockholders cannot expect to receive any dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Even if we were to determine that a dividend could be declared, we could be precluded from paying dividends by restrictive provisions of loans, leases or other financing documents or by legal prohibitions under applicable corporate law.




Our Series A Super Voting Rights Preferred Stock provides for voting rights that are 100 times the rights of Common Stock which will limit your ability to influence corporate matters




In December 2009, the Company issued to the President and CEO 1 million shares of Series A Super Voting Rights (“SVR”) Preferred Stock in exchange for Common Stock. The SVR Preferred Shares have no conversion, dividend or liquidation rights, however they provide for voting rights that are 100 times the rights of Common Shares. Accordingly, this stockholder could have significant influence over the outcome of any corporate transaction or other matter submitted to stockholders for approval, including mergers, consolidations and the sale of substantially all of our assets and could also prevent or cause a change in control. The interests of this stockholder may differ from the interests of other stockholders.




Risks Related to Internal Controls




The Company’s management has identified groups of control deficiencies, each of which, in the aggregate, represents a material weakness in the company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009.  See Item 9A in this report for Management’s discussion of these material weaknesses.




14


We have not been able to implement Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on a timely basis and accordingly we are not able to conclude that our internal controls are effective nor have we completed our Section 404 implementation.  We have in the past discovered, and may in the future discover, areas of our internal controls or difficulties encountered in their implementation, which could negatively affect our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations.  The costs necessary to achieve compliance may be significant





ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS





Not Applicable to Smaller Reporting Companies





ITEM 2. PROPERTIES





Our principal executive offices are located at 500 Technology Square, Suite 150, Cambridge, MA 02139.  In July 2009, we entered into a lease agreement to rent office space of 790 sq. ft. in Cambridge, Massachusetts for a base term of 12 months at a rate of $31,600/year.  The Company also leases a 636 square foot office space in Clearwater, Florida for a base term of 12 months for $12,720/year. Pak-It leases approximately 11⁄2 acre of land with about 60,000 square feet of office and manufacturing space in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania for $50,000 per year. Javaco leases 8,000 square feet of office and warehouse space in Hilliard, Ohio for $56,000 per year. In March, 2010, JBI RE #1, Inc. entered into a contract for sale for approximately 3.37 acres of land with about 14,000 square feet of office and manufacturing space in Niagara Falls, New York.  The seller is currently configuring the property to meet the needs of JBI RE #1 during which time lease payments are being made in the amount of $5,288/month.  These payments will be applied to the purchase price at the time of closing in mid-July.




ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS





We are not a party to any pending material legal proceedings, there are no known judgments against the Company, nor are there any pending material actions or suits filed or threatened against it or its officers and directors, in their capacities as such.   We are not aware of any claims against the Company or any reputed claims against it at this time except for claims of two former employees of the Pak-It subsidiary. These former employees have alleged that certain monies are due them pursuant to their employment agreements and the Company has retained legal counsel to handle the claims.  The amounts of the claims are deemed immaterial to the Company.





ITEM 4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED)




PART II





ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMPANY'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES





Price Range of Common Stock





Our common stock is quoted for trading on the OTCQX under symbol JBII. The following table sets forth the high and low trade information for our common stock. The prices reflect inter-dealer quotations, do not include retail mark-ups, markdowns or commissions and do not necessarily reflect actual transactions.





Periods

High

LowQuarter EndedMarch 31,  2008

$
.27

$
.14June 30, 2008

$
.14

$
.10September 30, 2008

$
.02

$
.02December 31, 2008

$
.01

$
.01M March 31, 2009

$
.01

$
.01June 30, 2009

$
1.03

$
.99September 30, 2009

$
1.20

$
1.18December 31, 2009

$
7.45

$
6.30




15





Holders of Our Common Stock




As of December 10, 2010, the Company had 51,241,926 shares of $0.001 par value common stock issued and outstanding held by approximately 2,000 shareholders of record.  Also as of December 10, 2010, the Company had 1,000,000 shares of Series A Super Voting Preferred Stock issued and outstanding held by 1 shareholder.




JBI has never declared or paid any cash dividends on its common stock. For the foreseeable future, JBI intends to retain any earnings to finance the development and expansion of its business, and it does not anticipate paying any cash dividends on its common stock. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will be dependent upon then existing conditions, including JBI’s financial condition and results of operations, capital requirements, contractual restrictions, business prospects and other factors that the board of directors considers relevant.




16


Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities





On May 20, 2010, the Company consummated a confidential private placement with certain accredited investors for the issuance and sale of 498,779 shares of the Company’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share (the “Common Stock”) at per share price of $4.00 for aggregate offering proceeds of $1,955,116. The Private Offering was conducted on a best efforts basis with a minimum investment of $10,000.




The Private Offering and issuance of Common Stock was an unregistered sale of securities conducted pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D or Regulation S promulgated thereunder. Such securities were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933.




ITEM 6. SELECTEDCONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA





Our selected consolidated financial data set below is derived from our audited financial statements. The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with our “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in Item 7 and Item 8, respectively.





Selected consolidated statement of operations data:





2009


2008Sales

$
3,907,527


$
15,050Cost of goods sold


3,171,974



-Gross profit


735,553



15,050Operating expenses


2,849,351



90,344Other expenses, net


92,194



35,668Income tax provision


-



-Net loss

$
(2,205,992
)

$
(110,962
)Basic & diluted earnings per share

$
(0.04
)

$
(0.00
)





Selected balance sheet accounts:


2009


2008Current assets

$
6,278,466


$
3,806Total assets


12,651,133



3,806Total liabilities


1,512,933



1,600Shareholders’ equity

$
11,138,200


$
2,206





ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS




This report on Form 10-K/A (“Report”) and the Company’s other communications and statements may contain “forward-looking statements,” including statements about the Company’s beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, estimates, projections and intentions. These statements are subject to significant risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on various factors, many of which are beyond the Company’s control. The words “may,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “target,” “goal,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements, by their nature, are subject to risks and uncertainties. The Company’s actual future results may differ materially from those set forth in the Company’s forward-looking statements. For information concerning these factors and related matters, see “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A in this Report, and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 in this Report. However, other factors besides those referenced could adversely affect the Company’s results, and you should not consider any such list of factors to be a complete set of all potential risks or uncertainties. Any forward-looking statements made by the Company herein speak as of the date of this Report. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement, except as required by law.


17





Business Overview





Management began executing its business plan in 2009 by acquiring three revenue generating sources in 2009 and concentrating R & D resources on scaling P2O for a 2010 launch. Detailed summaries of each acquisition and P2O are described in detail below.





Through recruiting efforts and these acquisitions, management believes that it has quickly assembled an experienced team of professionals that will allow the Company to grow both organically (within each subsidiary) and through synergistic acquisitions that have a demonstrated propensity towards being eco-friendly.





The company believes that both private and public entities will see the environmental benefit, positive cost analysis, and potential savings from unnecessary disposal of waste plastic using Plastic2Oil, which will provide incentives for expansion of sites..   By offering “green” products and continuing to use its proprietary technologies the Company will help create solutions to enormous problems.  From Pak-ItTM products, where we save fuel by “not shipping water”, to Plastic2Oil where we will create fuel from what is currently a costly plastics disposal problem, the Company is well positioned for growth.





In addition to the management expertise that came with the acquisitions, the Company has hired Ronald C. Baldwin, Jr. as CFO and Jacob Smith as COO.  These seasoned executives have already identified areas for improvement and have acted to make the acquisitions more profitable.





For instance, on or about January 20, 2010, Pak-It reduced its workforce from 49 to 36 employees as part of a corporate restructuring of the bulk cleaning component of the business.  The Company’s Chief Operating Officer, Jacob Smith, is overseeing the transition of the plant from primarily a labor intensive bulk chemical manufacturing company to a highly automated plant focused on production of our line of water soluble chemical Pak-Its.  The automation being put in place will allow the Company to operate more efficiently as well as satisfy the production rate necessary to support our national retail launch.




Significant Developments and Strategic Actions in 2009





In April 2009, John Bordynuik purchased 63% of the issued and outstanding shares of 310 Holdings on April 24, 2009. Subsequently, John Bordynuik was appointed President and CEO of the Company.





On August 24, 2009, the Company acquired Javaco, Inc. (“Javaco”), for its know-how in world-wide communications and its business experience in Mexico and South America. Management intends to utilize Javaco’s expertise to launch Plastic2Oil sites in Mexico and South America and to develop a secure communications infrastructure between the Plastic2Oil sites and the Company.  Javaco currently distributes over 100 lines of equipment from fiber optic transmitters to RF connectors. To further enhance business in the United States, new distribution lines are frequently being added including a line of home theater and audio video products.




On September 30, 2009, the Company acquired Pak-It, LLC, a Florida limited liability company. Pak-It operates two business units: 1) a bulk chemical processing, mixing, and packaging facility, and 2) a patented delivery system that packages condensed cleaners in small water-soluble packages. The acquisition of Pak-It, LLC was primarily driven by the Company’s desire to access the experience that the Pak-It management team has in chemistry, marketing, sales, operations, and finance. The Pak-It team was used to centralize JBI’s accounting in Clearwater, Florida for controls and reporting.  Management intends to utilize the Pak-It team to help grow all of the Company’s business segments, including the Philadelphia plant, which will perform the following:





●
Bulk packaging facility will mix and package the catalyst used in the Plastic2Oil process.


●
Continue to manufacture Pak-ItTM water-soluble sachets and assist in setting up Canada operations for manufacturing and sale of Pak-It products in Canada.


●
To sell cleaners using Pak-It technology in the retail market.


18





The Company has also been focusing on restructuring the Philadelphia plant and revised the business plan for growth into the retail market. Management is going forward with a full retail rollout of Pak-It products. The company engaged Western Creative Inc. on January 12, 2010 to assist in planning and marketing the retail launch. In anticipation of increased demand for product from the retail launch, management is also reconfiguring the plant and updating its equipment. We also procured a 20 MT (metric ton) Plastic2Oil Processor and are now developing all aspects of the process from procurement, to automated systems of feeding, processing, and collecting oil.




IsleChem was engaged by the Company on December 9, 2009 to verify the Company’s Plastic2Oil process. During 40 runs of tests, IsleChem was able to isolate the conditions that allowed the process to run optimally and provide engineering support to gather data to apply for a NYDEC air permit. IsleChem verified our Plastic2Oil process is scalable and repeatable.




In 2010, the Company assembled its 20T Plastic2Oil processor at its P2O factory in Niagara Falls, NY. The Company purchased a shredder and granulator to preprocess bulk plastic. A complete automation system with 63 sensors was installed on the Plastic2Oil processor for control, data logging, and management. The processor was run to gather operational steady state data for a stack test. Oxygen sensors supplied by a major US sensor manufacturer failed when exposed to the process over time and delayed our permit application process. A number of oxygen sensors were tested until a suitable replacement was found. Sensors on the processor are now functioning properly.




A minor by-product of the process is an off-gas much like natural gas. The process consumes much less off-gas to operate than is generated when operating at maximum capacity. Further testing at high processing rates proved that all the off-gas could not be burned (temporarily for a stack test) in the process furnace. Flaring the excess off-gas is common in the oil and gas industry but is not environmentally friendly, would waste the fuel value, and would require a separate permit. To avoid flaring the excess gas, the Company purchased a gas compression system to buffer and regulate the off-gas to 1) resell or 2) to cold start the process. The gas compression system and mobile storage tanks were installed on the Company’s 20T Plastic2Oil processor in June, 2010.    The gas compression was successfully interfaced to the Company's 20T processor. The 20T processor is presently being operated in steady-state conditions to gather data for an air permit.


In April, 2010 JBI negotiated with the former Pak-It management group and their affiliates, including Geoff Weber, Robert Shoemaker, Dick Haber, and Paul Raymond, for a potential written engagement for the provision of services intended to assist JBI management and support the launch of the Plastic2Oil business.  On or about April 22, 2010, the group proposed written terms concerning their engagement. JBI management determined that it was in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders to not accept the proposed terms and to proceed without the assistance of the group.


In May 2010, IsleChem engineered and had manufactured a simple solution to separate diesel and gasoline fractions into separate fuel tanks to remove the gasoline fraction from our diesel-like fuel. IsleChem is presently testing this solution with various plastic feedstock and it will be scaled to work on our 20T Plastic2Oil processor. The Company will not delay work and testing for an air permit by waiting for a large scale gas/diesel separator. The Company continues to make very positive productive progress with its P2O operations.




On December 22, 2009, the Company and Rick Heddle agreed to a Joint Venture whereby Heddle Marine Service, Inc. will retrofit ships with P2O processors. The Company is now finalizing a JV Agreement for production of its first P2O ship with Heddle. JBI anticipates contracting with various countries to convert their plastic waste into oil. Also, JBI has signed an Area Development Agreement (ADA) for 45 P2O sites in the State of Florida with AS PTO, LLC, an entity controlled by Al Sousa of Largo, Florida.  Both Heddle and Sousa have strong management capabilities and are expected to be essential to the scaling up of a nationwide P2O launch.




JBI continues to maintain its data recovery and migration business through the use of its tape drives. It currently has a mobile data container that can be deployed to transfer data onsite for customers with highly sensitive data. It acquired tape drives, servers, and the mobile data container through the acquisition of certain assets from John Bordynuik, Inc.  The Company has a large backlog of tapes to be migrated and is seeking strategic partnerships with international companies that will allow the Company to realize tape revenues faster, thereby decreasing the backlog.




Results of Operations





Years ended December 31, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008




For the year ended December 31, 2009, we generated $3,907,527 in revenues, and incurred a net loss of $2,205,992.  We had no significant activity during 2008.




19


Revenue Sources





We derive revenues from the sale of bulk cleaning chemicals and patented cleaning solutions in water soluble sachets through our Pak-It subsidiary, which comprised $1.6 million of total revenues during 2009.





Additionally, we derive revenues through Javaco through the sales and distribution of electronic components marketed in Mexico and Latin America, which comprised $2.1 million of total revenues during 2009.





Finally, we generate sales through reading high volume legacy data computer tapes for large institutions and corporations.  We expect that the commercial launch of Plastic2Oil will result in sales of the product produced by our units.





Gross Margin





Pak-It incurred $1.3 million of cost of goods sold resulting in gross margin of approximately $319,000.





Javaco produced gross margin of approximately $297,000 after cost of goods sold of $1.8 million.





Data incurred cost of goods sold of around $62,000 resulting in gross margin of approximately $119,000.





Operating Expenses




The Company incurred operating expenses of $2,849,351 for all operations during the year ended December 31, 2009.  After interest and taxes, the Company experienced a net loss of $2,205,992.





Stock-Based Compensation





The Company periodically issues shares of common stock for services rendered or for financing costs. Such shares are valued based on the market price on the transaction date.




The Company has been planning to adopt a formal plan which addresses all forms of share-based payment awards, including shares issued under employee stock purchase plans, stock options, restricted stock and stock appreciation rights. No such plan had been adopted as of December 15, 2010; however, the Company expects to follow through with this compensation plan in the first quarter of 2011. As salaries and benefits were a significant portion of operating expenses, this will effectively preserve the Company’s cash and increase performance incentives until a time when it is more prudent for our business to move salaries back to cash.





LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES




As of December 31, 2009 we have approximately $3.1 million cash on hand, most of which was being held in our attorney’s trust account which was released to the Company in January for availability to operations.  As of December 31, 2009 we had no material commitments for capital expenditures to disclose.




Historically, we have funded our operations through financing activities consisting primarily of private placements of debt and equity securities with existing shareholders and outside investors. Our principal use of funds has been for capital expenditures and general corporate expenses.




The Company has experienced cumulative operating losses for the year, and subsequent to year-end, a significant portion of the expenses incurred related to non-cash items such as the issuance of stock compensation totaling approximately $3.3 million. Additionally, the Company made significant one-time purchases of property and equipment relating to its Plastic2Oil technology and its fuel-blending site. Total capital purchases made subsequent to year-end exceeded $2.1 million. Upon receipt of the required permits, the Company expects to begin commercial operation of its Plastic2Oil processor at its Niagara Falls, New York facility in the fourth quarter of 2010, thereby initiating a new revenue stream from the sale of the output from the process.





There can be no guarantee that the Company will be successful in obtaining the required permits. In the event that the New York permit is not obtained in the near future, the Company has been reviewing the feasibility of realizing P2O revenue in different jurisdictions with partners who have already obtained the necessary air permits required for P2O. The Company is also reviewing the feasibility of installing a P2O machine in Ontario, where one of the Company's facilities recently obtained its air approvals. In the event the New York permit is not obtained and the Company fails to realize revenue through different avenues, the Company would not currently have sufficient cash for the next twelve months. In the event that cash is needed before fuel can be sold, the Company has a good current ratio and will seek short and/ or long-term borrowing opportunities. Additionally, the Company is taking steps to minimize expenses and reduce operating costs.


20





Critical Accounting Policies




Estimates





The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. We believe the following critical accounting policies have significant effect in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.





Impairments





If the carrying value of an asset, including goodwill and identifiable intangible assets exceeds the sum of estimated undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between estimated fair value and carrying value. Management assesses assets for recoverability at least annually, or whenever changes in circumstances indicate that an asset’s carrying amount may not be recoverable





Goodwill





Goodwill resulted primarily from business acquisitions. In accordance with accounting rules, goodwill is not amortized, but is subject to an annual impairment test, which the Company performs in the 4th quarter. The Company evaluates the carrying value of goodwill during the fourth quarter of each year and between annual evaluations if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount. Such circumstances could include, but are not limited to (1) a significant adverse change in legal factors or in business climate, (2) unanticipated competition, or (3) an adverse action or assessment by a regulator. When evaluating whether goodwill is impaired, the Company compares the fair value of the reporting unit to which the goodwill is assigned to the reporting unit’s carrying amount, including goodwill. The fair value of the reporting unit is estimated using a combination of the income, or discounted cash flows, approach and the market approach, which utilizes comparable companies’ data. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, then the amount of the impairment loss must be measured. The impairment loss would be calculated by comparing the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill to its carrying amount. In calculating the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill, the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the other assets and liabilities of that unit based on their fair values. The excess of the fair value of a reporting unit over the amount assigned to its other assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill. An impairment loss would be recognized when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. The Company’s evaluation of goodwill completed during the year resulted in no impairment losses.




Accounts Receivable





Accounts receivable represents unsecured obligations due from customers under terms requesting payments upon receipt of invoice up to ninety days, depending on the customer.  Accounts receivable are non-interest bearing and are stated at the amounts billed to the customer net of an allowance for uncollectible accounts. Customer balances with invoices over 90 days old are considered delinquent. Payments of accounts receivable are allocated to the specific invoices identified on the customer remittance, or if unspecified, are applied to the earliest unpaid invoice.




The allowance for uncollectible accounts reflects management’s best estimate of amounts that may not be collected based on an analysis of the age of receivables and the credit standing of individual customers.  Accounts receivable determined to be uncollectible are recognized using the allowance method.  The allowance for uncollectible accounts for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $59,000 and $0, respectively.





Revenue Recognition





The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned less estimated future doubtful accounts.  The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.


21





New accounting pronouncements and policies





Effective July 1, 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) approved the “FASB Accounting Standards Codification” (the “Codification”) as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“U.S. GAAP”).  The Codification does not change current U.S. GAAP, but is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative U.S. GAAP by providing all the authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place.  All existing accounting standard documents will be superseded and all other accounting literature not included in the Codification will be considered non-authoritative. The Codification is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009.  The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.





In August 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-04 “Accounting for Redeemable Equity Instruments - Amendment to Section 480-10-S99” which represents an update to section 480-10-S99, distinguishing liabilities from equity, per EITF Topic D-98, Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities.  The Company does not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.





In August 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-05 “Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures Topic 820 – Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value”, which provides amendments to subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures – Overall, for the fair value measurement of liabilities.  This Update provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the following techniques: 1. A valuation technique that uses: a. The quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset, b. Quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets. 2. Another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of topic 820; two examples would be an income approach, such as a present value technique, or a market approach, such as a technique that is based on the amount at the measurement date that the reporting entity would pay to transfer the identical liability or would receive to enter into the identical liability. The amendments in this Update also clarify that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. The amendments in this Update also clarify that both a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are required are Level 1 fair value measurements.  The Company does not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.





In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-08 “Earnings Per Share – Amendments to Section 260-10-S99”,which represents technical corrections to topic 260-10-S99, Earnings per share, based on EITF Topic D-53, Computation of Earnings Per Share for a Period that includes a Redemption or an Induced Conversion of a Portion of a Class of Preferred Stock and EITF Topic D-42, The Effect of the Calculation of Earnings per Share for the Redemption or Induced Conversion of Preferred Stock. The Company does not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.





In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-09 “Accounting for Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures and Accounting for Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees”.  This Update represents a correction to Section 323-10-S99-4, Accounting by an Investor for Stock-Based Compensation Granted to Employees of an Equity Method Investee. Additionally, it adds observer commentAccounting Recognition for Certain Transactions Involving Equity Instruments Granted to Other Than Employees to the Codification. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.


22





In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-12 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic 820 – Investment in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Assets Value Per Share (or Its Equivalent)”, which provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures-Overall, for the fair value measurement of investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value per share (or its equivalent). The amendments in this Update permit, as a practical expedient, a reporting entity to measure the fair value of an investment that is within the scope of the amendments in this Update on the basis of the net asset value per share of the investment (or its equivalent) if the net asset value of the investment (or its equivalent) is calculated in a manner consistent with the measurement principles of Topic 946 as of the reporting entity’s measurement date, including measurement of all or substantially all of the underlying investments of the investee in accordance with Topic 820. The amendments in this Update also require disclosures by major category of investment about the attributes of investments within the scope of the amendments in this Update, such as the nature of any restrictions on the investor’s ability to redeem its investments a the measurement date, any unfunded commitments (for example, a contractual commitment by the investor to invest a specified amount of additional capital at a future date to fund investments that will be made by the investee), and the investment strategies of the investees. The major category of investment is required to be determined on the basis of the nature and risks of the investment in a manner consistent with the guidance for major security types in U.S. GAAP on investments in debt and equity securities in paragraph 320-10-50-1B. The disclosures are required for all investments within the scope of the amendments in this Update regardless of whether the fair value of the investment is measured using the practical expedient. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.





Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.




Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements




We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.




ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVEAND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK





Not required for a Smaller Reporting Company.




ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA





Index




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
24Consolidated Balance Sheets – December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008
25Consolidated Statements of Operations – December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008
26Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity – December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008
27Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008
28Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
29


23






Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm






The Board of Directors




JBI, Inc.




We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of JBI Inc. (formerly known as 310 Holdings, Inc.), as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.




We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.  Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.




In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of JBI, Inc. as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.




As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has restated the 2009 financial statements to correct the accounting for business acquisitions and stock issuances. The effects of this restatement are disclosed in Note 2.




/s/ WithumSmith+Brown, PC




WithumSmith+Brown, PC


New Brunswick, New Jersey


December 15, 2010




24




JBI, Inc. and Subsidiaries
  CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
  December 31, 2009 and 2008
  ASSETS2009


2008(Restated)CURRENT ASSETSCash and cash equivalents


$
26,307


$
3,806Cash held in attorney trust



3,123,595



-Accounts receivable, net



1,662,202



-Inventories



1,414,813



-Prepaid expenses



51,549



-TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS


6,278,466



3,806PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENTLeasehold improvements



473,609



-Machinery and office equipment



572,295



-Vehicles



12,325



-Furniture and fixtures



17,679



-1,075,908



-Less accumulated depreciation and amortization



(101,120
)


-NET PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT


974,788



-OTHER ASSETSRestricted cash



144,500



-Goodwill



5,179,249



-Deposits



64,116



-Patents, net



10,014



-TOTAL OTHER ASSETS


5,397,879



-TOTAL ASSETS

$
12,651,133


$
3,806LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITYCURRENT LIABILITIESAccounts payable


$
1,066,949


$
-Accrued expenses



225,420



1,600Income taxes payable



159,661



-Deferred income taxes



60,903



-TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES


1,512,933



1,600Commitments and ContingenciesSHAREHOLDERS' EQUITYCommon Stock, par $0.001; 150,000,000 authorized, 69,453,840 and 63,700,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively


69,454



63,700Common Stock Subscribed, 1,022,410 shares at cost


817,928



-Stock subscriptions receivable



(817,928
)


-Preferred stock, par $0.001; 5,000,000 authorized, 1,000,000 and -0- shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively


1,000



-Additional paid in capital



13,377,032



41,800Accumulated deficit



(2,309,286
)


(103,294
)TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY


11,138,200



2,206TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

$
12,651,133


$
3,806
 
 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
  25
  JBI, Inc. and Subsidiaries
  CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
  Years Ended December 31,
 2009


2008(Restated )NET SALESPak-It

$
1,608,920


$
-Javaco


2,117,067



-Other


181,540



15,0503,907,527



15,050COST OF SALESPak-It


1,289,865



-Javaco


1,820,063



-Other


62,046



-3,171,974



-GROSS PROFIT


735,553



15,050OPERATING EXPENSES


-Compensation Paid in Stock


649,458



-Impairment of media credits


1,000,000



-Other Operating Expenses


1,199,893



90,344LOSS FROM OPERATIONS


(2,113,798
)


(75,294
)OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)Interest expense, net


(137,304
)


(35,668
)Other income, net


45,110



-OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE, NET)


(92,194
)


(35,668
)LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES


(2,205,992
)


(110,962
)INCOME TAX PROVISION


-



-NET LOSS

$
(2,205,992
)

$
(110,962
)Basic & diluted net loss per share

$
(0.04
)

$
(0.00
)Weighted average number of common shares outstanding


60,130,392



63,700,000
 
 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
  26
  JBI, Inc. and Subsidiaries
  CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
  Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
 
 Common Stock
Common Stock

Stock
Preferred Stock
Additional



Total$0.001 Par Value
Subscribed
Subscriptions
$0.001 Par Value

paid in

Retained
Shareholders'Shares
Amount
Shares

Amount
Receivable
Shares

Amount

Capital

Earnings

EquityBALANCE - DECEMBER 31, 2007
63,700,000
$ 63,700
-

$
-
$
-
-

$
-
$
41,800
$
7,668
$
113,168Net loss
-
-
-


-

-
-


-

-

(110,962)

(110,962)BALANCE - DECEMBER 31, 2008
63,700,000
63,700
-


-

-
-


-

41,800

(103,294)

2,206Common stock exchanged for Preferred
(30,000)
(30)
-


-

-
1,000,000

1,000

(970)

-

-Common stock retired
(9,970,000)
(9,970)
-


-

-
-


-

9,970

-

-Common stock issued for cash and settlement of shareholder advance, $3.00 per share
90,513
91
-


-

-
-


-

271,447

-

271,538Shares issued in exchange for assets of John Bordynuik, Inc., at historical carrying value (Note 8)
809,593
810
-


-

-
-


-

358,121

-

358,931Shares issued in connection with acquisition of Javaco and Media Credits, $1.00 per share (Note 8)
3,500,000
3,500
-


-

-
-


-

3,496,500

-

3,500,000Shares issued in connection with acquisition of Pak-It, $1.20 per share (Note 8)
625,001
625
-


-

-
-


-

749,375

-

750,000Shares issued and subscribed for in connection with private placement, $0.80 per share, net of issuance costs of $158,530
7,179,983
7,180
1,022,410

817,928

(817,928)
-


-

5,576,276

-

5,583,456Shares issued primarily to settle Pak-It acquisition indebtedness and acquisition fees, $0.80 per share
3,548,750
3,549
-


-

-
-


-

2,832,451

-

2,836,000Services contributed by shareholder
-
-
-


-

-
-


-

42,061

-

42,061Net loss (Restated)
-
-
-


-

-
-


-

-

(2,205,992)

(2,205,992)BALANCE - DECEMBER 31, 2009 (RESTATED)
69,453,840
$ 69,454
1,022,410
$
817,928
$
(817,928)
1,000,000
$
1,000
$
13,377,032
$
(2,309,286)
$
11,138,200
 
 27
  JBI, Inc. and Subsidiaries
  CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
  Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
  2009


2008CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES


(Restated)Net loss


$
(2,205,992
)

$
(110,962
)Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cashused in operating activities:Depreciation and amortization



101,713



-Provision for uncollectible accounts



65,444



-Deferred income taxes



(17,763
)


-Services contributed by shareholder



42,061



-Common shares issued for interest expense



29,766



-Common shares issued for sales commissions



100,000



-Common shares issued for management services



549,458



-Impairment of Media Credits



1,000,000



-Changes in:Accounts receivable



(691,535
)


-Inventories



(69,062
)


-Prepaid expenses, deposits and other



(91,398
)


-Accounts payable and accrued expenses



688,603



(4,802
)NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES


(498,705
)


(115,764
)CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIESIncrease in restricted cash



(144,500
)


-Increase in escrow cash



(3,123,595
)Acquisition of property and equipment, net



(11,081
)


-Cash received for acquisition of subsidiaries, net



455,046



-NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES


(2,824,130
)


-CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIESProceeds from shareholder advances



71,538



-Proceeds from issuance of common stock



5,941,987



-Direct offering costs



(158,530
)Repayments of notes payable



(2,509,659
)


-Net repayments of shareholder advances



-



(148,600
)NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES


3,345,336



(148,600
)NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS


22,501



(264,364
)CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR



3,806



268,170CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR


$
26,307


$
3,806Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:Cash paid for income taxes


$
-


$
-Cash paid for interest


$
137,304


$
35,668
 
 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
  28
  NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
 NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION
 
 Industry – JBI, Inc. (“the Company”) was originally incorporated as 310 Holdings, Inc. (“310”) in the State of Nevada on April 20, 2006. 310 had no significant activity from inception through 2009. In April 2009, John Bordynuik purchased 63% of the issued and outstanding shares of 310, and subsequently was appointed President and CEO of the Company. During 2009, the Company changed its name to JBI, Inc.
 
 On August 24, 2009, the Company acquired Javaco, Inc. a distributor of electronic components, including home theater and audio video products.
 
 On September 30, 2009, the Company acquired Pak-It, LLC, a Florida limited liability company. Pak-It operates a bulk chemical processing, mixing, and packaging facility.  It also has developed and patented a delivery system that packages condensed cleaners in small water-soluble packages (“sachets”). The acquisition of Pak-It, LLC was primarily driven by the Company’s desire to access the experience that the Pak-It management team has in chemistry, marketing, sales, operations, and finance.  Management intends to utilize the Pak-It team to help grow all of the Company’s business segments.   The Pak-It operating facility, located in Philadelphia, will be used to perform the following:
 
 
Bulk packaging facility will mix and package the catalyst used in the Plastic2Oil process.
Continue to manufacture Pak-ItTM water-soluble sachets and assist in setting up Canada operations for manufacturing and sale of Pak-ItTM products in Canada.
To sell cleaners using Pak-It’s technology in the retail space.
 See Note 8 for further information regarding these business combinations.
 
 NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND RESTATEMENT
 
 Restatement
 
 The Company has restated its 2009 consolidated financial statements previously issued on March 31, 2010 for matters related to the following items: (1) the original accounting for the acquisitions of Javaco and Pak-It which was improperly recorded as a reverse merger, whereby pre-acquisition operations of the acquired entities were erroneously reflected in the operations as originally reported; (2) the valuation and subsequent impairment of media credits; (3) the original acquisition of the assets of John Bordynuik, Inc. was improperly accounted for at fair value; and (4) equity issuances. The accompanying financial statements for 2009 have been restated to reflect the corrections.  The effect of this restatement to the financial statements is a decrease in total assets of approximately $11,507,000, an increase in net loss of approximately $2,179,000 and a decrease in equity of $11,809,000.
 
 The following is a summary of the restatements for the year ended December 31, 2009:
  Write off of previously recorded media credits

$
(1,000,000
)Decrease in income due to change in acquisition accounting for Pak-It


(1,616,600
)Decrease in income due to change in acquisition accounting for Javaco


(596,213
)Decrease in income due to change in acquisition accounting for John Bordynuik, Inc.


(126,569
)Decrease in operating expenses due to change in acquisition accounting


1,256,983Increase in net interest expense due to change in acquisition accounting


(141,469
)Increase in other income due to change in acquisition accounting


45,110Total reduction in 2009 net earnings

$
(2,178,758
)
 Decrease in valuation of media credits

$
(9,997,134
)Decrease in value of assets acquired from John Bordynuik, Inc.


(572,101
)Decrease in cash proceeds received from issuance of common stock


(730,874
)Decrease in assets from other adjustments


(206,791
)Total reduction in 2009 total assets

$
(11,506,900
)
  29
  The effect on the Company’s previously issued 2009 financial statements is summarized as follows:
 
 Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2009
 
 Previously Reported


Increase / (Decrease)


RestatedCurrent Assets

$
17,695,740


$
(11,417,274
)

$
6,278,466Property and Equipment


1,242,844



(268,056
)


974,788Other Assets


5,219,449



178,430



5,397,879Total Assets


24,158,033



(11,506,900
)


12,651,133Current Liabilities


1,211,125



301,808



1,512,933Stockholders’ Equity:Additional paid-in capital


20,653,313



(7,276,281
)


13,377,032Accumulated earnings/(deficit)


2,226,052



(4,535,338
)


(2,309,286
)Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity


24,158,033



(11,506,900
)


12,651,133
 
 Statement of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2009
 
 Previously Reported


Increase / (Decrease)


RestatedNet Sales

$
13,401,820


$
(9,494,293
)

$
3,907,527Cost of Sales


10,326,884



(7,154,910
)


3,171,974Gross Profit


3,074,936



(2,339,383
)


735,553Operating Expenses


3,106,334



(256,983
)


2,849,351Loss from Operations


(31,398
)


(2,082,400
)


(2,113,798
)Other Income (Expense), Net


4,164



(96,358
)


(92,194
)Net Loss


(27,234
)


(2,178,758
)


(2,205,992
)
 
 Reclassifications
 Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior years’ financial statements to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported results of operations or retained earnings.
  Basis of Presentation
 
 These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the JBI, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Javaco, Inc. and Pak-It, LLC.   All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Prior to 2008, the Company was in the development stage, and accordingly the financial statements prior to 2008 had been prepared in accordance with the provisions of accounting and reporting by development stage enterprises.
 
 New accounting pronouncements and policies
 
 Effective July 1, 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) approved the “FASB Accounting Standards Codification” (the “Codification”) as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“U.S. GAAP”).  The Codification does not change current U.S. GAAP, but is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative U.S. GAAP by providing all the authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place.  All existing accounting standard documents will be superseded and all other accounting literature not included in the Codification will be considered non-authoritative. The Codification is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009.  The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
 
 In August 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-04 “Accounting for Redeemable Equity Instruments - Amendment to Section 480-10-S99” which represents an update to section 480-10-S99, distinguishing liabilities from equity, per EITF Topic D-98, Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities.  The Company does not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
  30
  In August 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-05 “Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures Topic 820 – Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value”, which provides amendments to subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures – Overall, for the fair value measurement of liabilities.  This Update provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the following techniques: 1. A valuation technique that uses: a. The quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset, b. Quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets. 2. Another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of topic 820; two examples would be an income approach, such as a present value technique, or a market approach, such as a technique that is based on the amount at the measurement date that the reporting entity would pay to transfer the identical liability or would receive to enter into the identical liability. The amendments in this Update also clarify that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. The amendments in this Update also clarify that both a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are required are Level 1 fair value measurements.  The Company does not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
 
 In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-08 “Earnings Per Share – Amendments to Section 260-10-S99”,which represents technical corrections to topic 260-10-S99, Earnings per share, based on EITF Topic D-53, Computation of Earnings Per Share for a Period that includes a Redemption or an Induced Conversion of a Portion of a Class of Preferred Stock and EITF Topic D-42, The Effect of the Calculation of Earnings per Share for the Redemption or Induced Conversion of Preferred Stock. The Company does not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
 
 In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-09 “Accounting for Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures and Accounting for Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees”.  This Update represents a correction to Section 323-10-S99-4, Accounting by an Investor for Stock-Based Compensation Granted to Employees of an Equity Method Investee. Additionally, it adds observer commentAccounting Recognition for Certain Transactions Involving Equity Instruments Granted to Other Than Employees to the Codification. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
 
 In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-12 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic 820 – Investment in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Assets Value Per Share (or Its Equivalent)”, which provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures-Overall, for the fair value measurement of investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value per share (or its equivalent). The amendments in this Update permit, as a practical expedient, a reporting entity to measure the fair value of an investment that is within the scope of the amendments in this Update on the basis of the net asset value per share of the investment (or its equivalent) if the net asset value of the investment (or its equivalent) is calculated in a manner consistent with the measurement principles of Topic 946 as of the reporting entity’s measurement date, including measurement of all or substantially all of the underlying investments of the investee in accordance with Topic 820. The amendments in this Update also require disclosures by major category of investment about the attributes of investments within the scope of the amendments in this Update, such as the nature of any restrictions on the investor’s ability to redeem its investments a the measurement date, any unfunded commitments (for example, a contractual commitment by the investor to invest a specified amount of additional capital at a future date to fund investments that will be made by the investee), and the investment strategies of the investees. The major category of investment is required to be determined on the basis of the nature and risks of the investment in a manner consistent with the guidance for major security types in U.S. GAAP on investments in debt and equity securities in paragraph 320-10-50-1B. The disclosures are required for all investments within the scope of the amendments in this Update regardless of whether the fair value of the investment is measured using the practical expedient. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
 
 Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.
  31
  Estimates
 
 The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U. S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The most significant estimates relate to Goodwill, the value of assets and liabilities acquired, valuation of inventory, and the allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable. These estimates may be adjusted as more current information becomes available, and any adjustment could be significant.
 
 Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
 The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents
  Accounts Receivable
 Accounts receivable represents unsecured obligations due from customers under terms requesting payments upon receipt of invoice up to ninety days, depending on the customer.  Accounts receivable are non-interest bearing and are stated at the amounts billed to the customer net of an allowance for uncollectible accounts. Customer balances with invoices over 90 days old are considered delinquent. Payments of accounts receivable are allocated to the specific invoices identified on the customer remittance, or if unspecified, are applied to the earliest unpaid invoice.
  The allowance for uncollectible accounts reflects management’s best estimate of amounts that may not be collected based on an analysis of the age of receivables and the credit standing of individual customers.  Accounts receivable determined to be uncollectible are recognized using the allowance method.  The allowance for uncollectible accounts for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $59,000 and $0, respectively.
  Inventories
  Inventories, which consist primarily of electrical components and chemicals, are stated at the lower of cost or market. The Company uses the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method of determining cost.
  Property and Equipment
 
 Property and Equipment are recorded at cost.  Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the various classes of assets as follows:
 
 Leasehold improvements
lesser of useful life or term of the leaseMachinery and office equipment
5-7  yearsVehicles
5 yearsFurniture and fixtures
7  yearsOffice and industrial buildings
25  years
 
 Gains and losses on depreciable assets retired or sold are recognized in the statement of operations in the year of disposal. Repairs and maintenance expenditures are expensed as incurred and expenditures that increase the value or useful life of the asset are capitalized.
  Impairments
 
 If the carrying value of an asset, including goodwill and identifiable intangible assets exceeds the sum of estimated undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between estimated fair value and carrying value. Management assesses assets for recoverability at least annually, or whenever changes in circumstances indicate that an asset’s carrying amount may not be recoverable
  32
  Goodwill
 
 Goodwill resulted primarily from business acquisitions. In accordance with accounting rules, goodwill is not amortized, but is subject to an annual impairment test, which the Company performs in the 4th quarter. The Company evaluates the carrying value of goodwill during the fourth quarter of each year and between annual evaluations if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount. Such circumstances could include, but are not limited to (1) a significant adverse change in legal factors or in business climate, (2) unanticipated competition, or (3) an adverse action or assessment by a regulator. When evaluating whether goodwill is impaired, the Company compares the fair value of the reporting unit to which the goodwill is assigned to the reporting unit’s carrying amount, including goodwill. The fair value of the reporting unit is estimated using a combination of the income, or discounted cash flows, approach and the market approach, which utilizes comparable companies’ data. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, then the amount of the impairment loss must be measured. The impairment loss would be calculated by comparing the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill to its carrying amount. In calculating the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill, the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the other assets and liabilities of that unit based on their fair values. The excess of the fair value of a reporting unit over the amount assigned to its other assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill. An impairment loss would be recognized when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. The Company’s evaluation of goodwill completed during the year resulted in no impairment losses.
  Changes in the carrying amount of Goodwill were as follows:
  Balance, December 31, 2008

$
0Goodwill from business acquisitions (Note 8)


5,179,249Balance, December 31, 2009

$
5,179,249
 
 Patents
 
 Patents are initially measured based on their fair values. Patents are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of 10 to 17 years, and are stated net of accumulated amortization of $594 and $0 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Patent amortization expense charged to operations was $594 for 2009 and $0 for 2008.
   Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
 The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.
 
 Liquidity
 
 The Company has experienced cumulative operating losses for the year, and subsequent to year-end, a significant portion of the expenses incurred related to non-cash items such as the issuance of stock compensation totaling approximately $3.3 million. Additionally, the Company made significant one-time purchases of property and equipment relating to its Plastic2Oil technology and its fuel-blending site. Total capital purchases made subsequent to year-end exceeded $2.1 million. Upon receipt of the required permits, the Company expects to begin commercial operation of its Plastic2Oil processor at its Niagara Falls, New York facility in the fourth quarter of 2010, thereby initiating a new revenue stream from the sale of the output from the process.
 
 There can be no guarantee that the Company will be successful in obtaining the required permits. In the event that the New York permit is not obtained in the near future, the Company has been reviewing the feasibility of realizing P2O revenue in different jurisdictions with partners who have already obtained the necessary air permits required for P2O. The Company is also reviewing the feasibility of installing a P2O machine in Ontario, where one of the Company's facilities recently obtained its air approvals. In the event the New York permit is not obtained and the Company fails to realize revenue through different avenues, the Company would not currently have sufficient cash for the next twelve months. In the event that cash is needed before fuel can be sold, the Company will seek short and/ or long-term borrowing opportunities. Additionally, the Company is taking steps to minimize expenses and reduce operating costs.
  33
  Revenue Recognition
 
 The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned less estimated future doubtful accounts.  The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.
 
 Shipping and handling costs
 
 The Company’s shipping and handling costs are included in cost of sales for all periods presented.
 
 Advertising costs
 
 The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred.  Advertising costs approximated $16,953 and $0 during 2009 and 2008, respectively.
 
 Income Taxes
 
 The Company utilizes the asset and liability method to measure and record deferred income tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect the future income tax effects of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis and are measured using enacted tax rates that apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
 
 The Company adopted the accounting standards associated with uncertain tax positions as of January 1, 2007. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations or financial position. Upon adoption, the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits. Furthermore, the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2009. The Company files tax returns in the U.S federal and state jurisdictions. The Company has no open tax years prior to December 31, 2006.
 
 Earnings Per Share
 
 The financial statements include basic and diluted per share information. Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.  Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during each period.  There were no potentially dilutive shares outstanding as of December 31, 2009 or 2008.
 
 Concentrations and Credit Risk
 
 Financial instruments which potentially expose the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of operating demand deposit accounts and accounts receivable. The Company’s policy is to place its operating demand deposit accounts with high credit quality financial institutions that are insured by the FDIC, however, account balances may at times exceed insured limits. The Company extends limited credit to its customers based upon their creditworthiness and establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon the credit risk of specific customers, historical trends and other pertinent information.
 
 Restricted Cash
 
 Pursuant to the terms of an employment agreement between the Company and an officer, the Company is required to have $144,500 held in an attorney trust account for the settlement of any future severance payments.
 
  34
  NOTE 3 – INVENTORIES, NET
  Inventories at December 31 consist of the following:
 2009


2008Raw materials

$
773,867


$
-Work in progress


18,959



-Finished goods


621,987



-Total inventory

$
1,414,813


$
-
  NOTE 4 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
 
 Lease Commitments
 The Company leases facilities and equipment under operating leases with terms ranging from 1 to 6 years.   Future minimum rent payments due under these leases are as follows:
 Year ending December 31, 2010

$
184,7452011

$
50,0002012

$
50,4162013

$
55,0002014

$
55,000Thereafter

$
55,000Total

$
450,161
 
 The preceding data reflects existing leases and does not include replacements upon expiration. In the normal course of business, operating leases are generally renewed or replaced by other leases. Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $48,592 and $0, respectively.
 
 Contingencies
 The Company is not a party to any legal proceedings, there are no known judgments against the Company, nor are there any known actions or suits filed or threatened against it or its officers and directors, in their capacities as such.   We are not aware of any claims against the Company or any reputed claims against it at this time except for claims of two former employees of the Pak-It subsidiary. These former employees have alleged that certain monies are due them pursuant to their employment agreements and the Company has retained legal counsel to handle the claims.  The amounts of the claims are deemed immaterial to the Company.
 
 The Company has employment agreements with its officers and key employees that provide for minimum compensation and severance payments due upon termination.
 
 NOTE 5 – BORROWING ARRANGEMENTS
 
 Javaco, Inc. has a $200,000 credit line available through a financial institution, which is renewable on an annual basis and carries an interest rate of 4.25%.  No balance was due under this note as of December 31, 2009 and the credit line was not renewed.
 
 Pak-It, LLC has a $1,550,000 credit line available through a financial institution which is renewable on an annual basis and carries an interest rate of prime rate of interest plus one-half percent.  No balance was due under this note as of December 31, 2009 and the credit line was not renewed.
  35
  NOTE 6 – INCOME TAXES
 
 The components of the Company’s deferred tax assets/liabilities are as follows at December 31:
  2009


2008Deferred tax assets (liabilities):Net operating loss carry forwards

$
864,000


$
43,275Allowance for doubtful accounts


23,000



-Depreciation


3,000



-Vacation accrual


3,000



-Section 481(a) adjustment


(60,903
)


-Amortization


(32,000
)


-Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) before valuation allowance


800,097



43,275Valuation allowance


(861,000
)


(43,275
)Net Deferred tax assets (liabilities)

$
(60,903
)

$
-
 
 At December 31, 2009, the company had net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $1,831,000 that may be offset against future taxable income through 2029.
  A reconciliation of the provision (benefit) for income taxes with amounts determined by applying the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate to income before income taxes is as follows:
  Year Ended December 312009


2008Computed tax benefit at the federal statutory rate of 34%

$
761,889


$
40,285Valuation allowance


(761,889
)


(40,285
)Provision (benefit) for income taxes

$
0


$
0Effective income tax rate


0
%


0
%
  NOTE 7 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
 On June 25, 2009, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement (the “Agreement”) to purchase certain assets of John Bordynuik, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Data”).  Under the terms of the Agreement, the Company issued 809,593 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share in consideration for the assets of Data.  The acquisition was treated as a transaction between entities under common control, and accordingly the assets were recorded at their historical carrying values totaling $358,931.  The closing of the Agreement occurred on July 15, 2009.
 
 In 2009, Mr. Bordynuik exchanged $200,000 cash for 66,667 shares of stock and he received 23,846 shares to cancel $71,538 of debt, each at $3 per share
 
 During December 2009, the Company issued Mr. Bordynuik 1 million shares of Series A Super Voting Preferred Stock (“Preferred shares”) in exchange for the return of 30,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.  Preferred shares have no conversion or dividend rights, but carry 100 to 1 voting rights (as compared to common shares). Further, Mr. Bordynuik returned and retired 9,970,000 common shares to the Company during 2009, and an additional 21,000,000 shares were returned to the Company and retired in March, 2010.
  36
  From December 2009 through January 2010, JBI, Inc., consummated a confidential private placement (the “Private Offering”) with certain accredited investors for the issuance and sale of 8,439,893 shares of the Company’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share (the “Common Stock”) at per share price of $0.80 for aggregate offering proceeds of $6,751,914.  The Private Offering was conducted in connection with the acquisition of Pak-It, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, by the Company.  During 2009, the Company had received gross proceeds of approximately $5.9 million, and also had subscriptions for an additional $817,928, or 1,022,410 shares. Costs associated with the Private Offering totaled $161,529. Subsequent to year-end the Company collected the subscriptions receivable, as well as an additional $190,000 in gross proceeds from subscriptions received in January 2010.
 
 The Private Offering was conducted on a best efforts basis with a minimum investment of $10,000 by the Company’s officers and directors.
  In connection with the acquisition of Pak-It, the Company also converted a total of $2,156,775 of debt owed to the Pak-It members and lien holders at a per share price of $0.80.  The Company issued 3,420,000 shares of common stock in conjunction with this debt conversion.  The total acquisition cost of Pak-It exceeded the identifiable net assets purchased by $549,458, which have been charged to operations as additional services provided.
  The Private Offering and issuance of shares to the Pak-It members and lien holders was an unregistered sale of securities conducted pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D or Regulation S promulgated thereunder. Such securities were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933.
 
 NOTE 8 – BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
 
 On August 24, 2009, the Company purchased 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Javaco, Inc. in exchange for $150,000 in cash and 2,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, valued at $2,500,000.  In connection with the agreement, the company also received media credits in print and radio in exchange for the issuance of an additional 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, valued at $1,000,000.  As the service provider began to perform under the contract, it became apparent that the Company had overestimated the future benefit that these credits would provide.   The value of the 3,500,000 common shares issued was determined based on the market price of the Company’s common shares on the date of exchange.  Javaco’s results of operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition.
  Javaco, incorporated in March 2000, distributes electrical components and equipment, including home theater and audio video products.
 
 The following table presents the allocation of the acquisition cost to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based on their estimated fair values:
  Cash and cash equivalents

$
26,797Accounts receivable


575,915Inventories


564,548Other current assets


6,186Equipment


30,008Goodwill


2,369,390Total assets acquired


3,572,844Amounts payable to banks and other lenders due within one year


(299,150
)Other current liabilities


(623,695
)Total liabilities assumed


(922,845
)Net assets acquired

$
2,650,000
  37
  While the acquisition of the media credits was connected to the acquisition of Javaco, it was the subject of a separate agreement which specified the purchase price of 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.  Accordingly, once management determined the value of the media credits was overestimated, the value of the shares given in exchange was charged to operations.
  On September 30, 2009, the Company purchased 100% of the membership interests of Pak-It, LLC in exchange for, 625,001 shares of the Company’s common stock, valued at $750,000, and the assumption of $3,865,000 in debts.  The value of the common shares issued was determined based on the market price of the Company’s common shares on the transaction date.
 
 Pak-It’s results of operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition.
  The following table presents the allocation of the acquisition to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based on their estimated fair values:
  Cash and cash equivalents

$
578,249Accounts receivable


460,196Inventories


781,203Other current assets


18,081Property, plant, and equipment and patents


686,495Goodwill


2,809,859Total assets acquired


5,334,083Amounts payable to banks and long-term debt due within one year


(237,658
)Other current liabilities


(481,425
)Other liabilities


(2,665,000
)Total liabilities assumed


(3,384,083
)Net assets acquired

$
1,950,000
 
 The above purchase price allocations have been done using management estimates.  The Company expects to have third party valuations done during 2010 but management does not expect the valuations to be materially different.  Any difference will be adjusted when the valuations are completed and recorded as a current period charge as needed.
  The following (unaudited) pro forma consolidated results of operations have been prepared as if the acquisitions of Javaco and Pak-It had occurred at January 1, 2008:
  December

31, 2009


December

31, 2008Sales

$
13,401,820


$
13,810,856Net loss


(27,234
)


(104,152
)Net loss per share—Basic


(0.00
)


(0.00
)Net loss per share—Diluted


(0.00
)


(0.00
)
 The pro forma information is presented for informational purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that actually would have been achieved had the acquisition been consummated as of that time, nor is it intended to be a projection of future results.
  38
  The Company paid an aggregate cash amount of $1,768,353 for debt owed to the Pak-It members and lien holders.  In addition, the Company paid off debt and founder loans of its subsidiary Javaco in an amount totaling $397,644 from the proceeds of the Private Offering.
  NOTE 9 – SEGMENT REPORTING
  During 2009, the Company had three principal operating segments, Data, Pak-It, and Javaco. The Company had no material operations during 2008.
  These operating segments were determined based on the nature of the products and services offered. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision-maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company’s chief executive officer has been identified as the chief operating decision maker, and directs the allocation of resources to operating segments based on the profitability and cash flows of each respective segment.
  The Company evaluates performance based on several factors, of which the primary financial measure is net income. The accounting policies of the business segments are the same as those described in “Note 2: Summary of Accounting Policies.” Intersegment sales are accounted for at fair value as if sales were to third parties. The following tables show the operations of the Company’s reportable segments:
  39
  Data

Pak-It

Javaco

Eliminations

Consolidated2009Net sales

$
181,540

$
1,608,920

$
2,117,067

$
—

$
3,907,527Net loss

$
875,291

$
325,189

$
1,005,512

$
—

$
2,205,992Total assets

$
12,470,002

$
4,740,574

$
4,203,174

$
(8,762,617
)
$
12,651,133Accounts receivable

$
27

$
523,941

$
1,138,234

$
—

$
1,662,202Inventories

$
—

$
773,867

$
640,946

$
—

$
1,414,813
  The Company has concluded that 2008 segment information was not significant to these financial statements.
  Information as to the Company’s sales in different geographical areas is as follows:
 2009


2008Net Sales:United States

$
2,539,571


$
15,050Mexico


533,297



0Peru


439,253



0Costa Rica


374,799



0Other


20,607



0$
3,907,527


$
15,050
 
  Sales are attributable to geographic areas based on location of customer. Neither the Company nor any of its segments depends on any single customer, small group of customers, or government for more than 10% of its sales.
  Also, because a substantial portion of the Company’s sales are derived from the sales of product manufactured in the United States, long-lived assets located outside the United States are less than 10%.
  NOTE 10 – SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
  Common shares returned and retired

$
9,970


$
—Common shares exchanged for Preferred shares

$
30


$
—Common shares issued in conjunction with Javaco acquisition

$
2,500,000


$
—Common shares issued in conjunction with acquisition of media credits

$
1,000,000


$
—Common shares issued in conjunction with Pak-It acquisition

$
750,000


$
—Common shares issued to acquire assets of John Bordynuik, Inc.

$
358,931


$
—Debt issued in conjunction with Pak-It acquisition

$
3,865,000


$
—Common shares issued to settle Pak-It acquisition indebtedness

$
2,156,775


$
—Common shares issued to settle shareholder advance

$
71,538


$
—Common stock subscribed

$
817,928


$
—
 
 NOTE 11 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
 
 As described in Note 7, the Company issued shares of common stock to acquire assets from John Bordynuik, Inc. (“Data”), a company owned partially by the Company’s President and CEO, valued at $342,563. Many of the contracts associated with providing tape reading services are still held in the name of Data, though it is their intent to transfer these contracts during the 2nd quarter of 2010. As such, Data bills customers for the tape reading services, collects the money and remits the funds to the Company. During 2009, $184,000 of revenues related to tape reading was paid to the Company by Data. There were no amounts for 2008.
 
 During 2009, the Company’s President and CEO, who is also a majority shareholder, paid for direct labor costs associated with the reading of tapes, for which he was not reimbursed. The total costs amounted to $42,061 and have been recorded as a capital contribution. There were no amounts for 2008.
  40
  As described in Note 7, John Bordynuik, Inc. advanced the Company $71,538 for operating expenses.  The advance was non-interest bearing and was settled though the issuance of 23,846 shares of common stock.  Also, the Company issued 66,667 shares of common stock to John Bordynuik, Inc. for $200,000.  There are no amounts due to or from John Bordynuik, Inc. as of December 31, 2009 and 2008.  John Bordynuik, Inc. is a company controlled by John Bordynuik, the President and CEO of JBI, Inc.
 
 As described in Note 7, the Company’s President and CEO, exchanged 30,000 shares of Common stock for 1 million shares of Preferred stock. Further, the President and CEO returned 9,970,000 shares of Common stock during 2009, and another 21 million shares of Common stock in March 2010 (Note 13).
 
 NOTE 12 – FAILED MERGER
 
 The Company and G&G Mining Corp., a Florida corporation, entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger on October 29, 2008 whereby G&G mining Corp was to be merged into the Company (“Merger Agreement”) pursuant to a reorganization within the meaning of Sections 368(a)(1)(A) and 368(a)(2)(D) of the IRS Code. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, the shareholders of G&G mining Corp were to receive an aggregate of 6,160,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and the Company was to receive all of the issued and outstanding shares of G&G mining Corp. The planned merger was never completed and is not reflected in the Company’s financial statements.
  
 NOTE 13 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
 
 The Company has evaluated subsequent events occurring after the balance sheet through the date for which the financial statements were issued, and has identified the following:
  Through January 14, 2010, the Company consummated a confidential private placement with certain accredited investors for the issuance and sale of 8,439,893 shares of the common stock.  The offering was at $0.80 and the gross proceeds received by the Company were $6,751,914.  The offering was made in connection with the previously completed acquisition of Pak-It, LLC and within the offering converted $2,736,000 of debt owed to the Pak-It members at a per share price of $0.80.  The total shares issued pursuant to the offering were 8,439,893. As a result of the private placement the Company paid all debt (except normal recurring accounts payable and accruals) and added in excess of $3.1 million in available cash.
 
 In February, 2010, the Company appointed four new Directors to the Board.  In April, 2010 the Company appointed a new Director to the Board.  In June, 2010 the Company accepted the resignation of a member of the Board, who was then retained as an employee of the Company.
 
 During February, 2010, the Company formed two Nevada corporations as wholly owned subsidiaries: Plastic2Oil Land, Inc., Plastic2Oil Marine, Inc. to operate P2O operations on land and sea, respectively.  The Company expects to begin commercial operations of converting waste plastic to oil in the third quarter of 2010.  In addition, the Company entered into its first Area Development Agreement with AS PTO, LLC to promote licensing and P2O operations in Florida using a combination of Joint Ventures (JV’s) and Company owned sites.  In February the first license was issued to Plastic 2 Oil of Clearwater 1, LLC (a Delaware LLC) and was arranged with members Plastic2Oil Land, Inc., AS PTO, LLC and ES Resources, LLC.   The Company is presently negotiating an agreement with Pak-It former management team to roll out P2O in Florida.  These ongoing discussions could potentially result in further agreements covering additional geographical areas.
 
 In February, 2010, the Company formed a wholly owned New York corporation, JBI RE #1, Inc. to purchase an industrial building in Niagara Falls, NY.  This building will house the first commercial operation of the P2O entities. This property is currently being leased from the seller pending completion of the contract to purchase the property.
 
 In February, 2010, the Company formed a wholly-owned Ontario corporation, JBI (Canada), Inc., to produce, market and sell the Pak-ItTM products in Canada.
  41
  In February, 2010, the Company formed a wholly owned Ontario corporation, JBI RE One, Inc., to purchase 6 acres of land with an industrial building in Thorold, Ontario.  The transaction was completed in June, 2010.
 
 In March, 2010 the Chief Executive Officer returned and retired 21,000,000 shares of Common Stock.
 
 In the first quarter of 2010, the Company issued 404,700 shares of Common Stock to officers and key employees as compensation.
 
 In May, 2010 the Company formed a wholly-owned New York limited liability company, Plastic2Oil of NY #1, LLC, to operate the P2O operations and R&D functions at the Niagara Falls, NY facility.
 
 In May, 2010, the Company consummated a confidential private placement with certain accredited investors for the issuance and sale of up to 1,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share at per share price of $4.00.  The net proceeds received by the Company were in the amount of $1,955,116, for the sale of 488,779 shares.
 
 In May 2010, the Board of Directors approved compensation for its independent members.  Compensation includes the one-time issuance of restricted stock and annual stock options for which the strike price will be set each year.
 
 On May 19, 2010, the Company executed an Employment Agreement with CEO John Bordynuik which takes effect upon issuance of an air permit for the Company’s P2O processor.  The agreement provides for minimum annual compensation as well as the issuance of stock options contingent upon the achievement of certain milestones, none of which have been met as of December 15, 2010.
 
 On June 17, 2010, the Company purchased a building to be used as a corporate office. The purchase price was $369,769.  The Company put $97,308 down and the vendor took back a five-year mortgage for $272,461 at an interest rate of 7%.  The mortgage is denominated in Canadian dollars and will fluctuate based on the exchange rate in effect.
 
 On June 29, 2010, the Company was notified by FINRA that the Company stock was not eligible for quotation on and would be removed from the OTC Bulletin Board, due to its delinquency in filing this Form 10-Q.
 
 In July 2010, the Company closed the Cambridge, Massachusetts office space that formerly served as the main corporate address.  The decision was made to not renew the lease, which expires at the end of August in order to minimize expenditures.  The new corporate address is 1783 Allanport Road, Thorold, Ontario, Canada L0S 1K0.
 
 In June 2010, the Company had initiated an application to trade on the OTCQX exchange. The OTCQX accepted the Company’s application, and trading of the Company’s stock on this exchange commenced on August 19th 2010.
 
 On September 17, 2010, the Company received results from the stack test performed by Conestoga-Rovers & Associates (“CRA”) on August 17, 2010.  The test was performed on the Company’s 20 metric-ton processor and was witnessed by the New York Department of Environmental Conservation (“NYDEC”).  CRA's results indicate that the processor is emitting a high percentage of oxygen back into the air while emitting very little, if any, toxic substances during the conversion of waste plastic into usable hydrocarbon fuels.   The stack test confirmed that the P2O processor emissions are considerably below maximum emissions allowed under a NYDEC simple air permit. The stack test also confirmed the only air permit required for P2O is a simple air permit.
 
 The Company received notice dated October 15, 2010 that the Ontario Ministry of Environment registered a “certificate of Approval for Air, Section 9, EPA” in the Company’s name. A “Certificate of Approval for Air” in Ontario is equivalent to a NYDEC Air Permit in the United States. The Company also received a Certificate of Approval for Industrial Sewage Works, Section 53, from the Ministry of the Environment. These approvals are for use at the Company’s fuel blending site. The Ministry of Environment allowed the transfer of existing approvals (permits) of the blending site to the Company.
  42
  In October, 2010, CEO John Bordynuik canceled 200,000 of his shares, a private placement stock certificate was adjusted by 5,000 shares to the correct amount, and the Company issued 410,000 shares as compensation for services and to employees thereby raising the total outstanding shares by 215,000.
 
 On November 10th, 2010, JBI Inc.’s simple air permit application was officially submitted to the DEC after significant consultation and meetings between the parties. JBI Inc.’s environmental consultant has significant experience with permitting and in consulting with the DEC prior to submitting our permit application, we mutually agreed upon language and data so that many of the questions that would typically arise during a permit review process were already eliminated. These lengthy consultations and discussions with the DEC about the permit language and data greatly reduce the amount of time required for the DEC to review a submitted application.  However, there can be no guarantee that the Company will be successful in obtaining the necessary permits.
  On December 14, 2010 JBI, Inc. entered into a formal Consent Order with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) Region 9, which will allow the Company to immediately operate its Plastic2Oil process commercially, sell fuel, and begin construction of an additional processor at its Niagara Falls, New York P2O facility. The Company must submit final documentation to the DEC within given timeframes, with regards to the issuance of the Company's finalized permits, to ensure the fulfillment of the permitting process.
 
 On December 15, 2010 JBI, Inc executed an agreement to lease the premises of a permitted material recycling facility for 20 years. The 18,000 square foot recycling facility resides on a 15 acre site and accepts, separates and processes paper, plastics and other materials. The facility includes 3 onsite bailers, several trailers, a shredder and approximately 20 remote bailing machines operating at customer sites. The site also has a solid waste permit which allows for 300 metric tons of material to be processed at the site at any one time. This permit also allows for the storage of up to 9 metric tons of refuse derived from the sorting, processing and bailing of the materials received. The lease agreement provides for monthly rent at the greater of 20 percent of gross revenue derived from the operations of the facility or the contractual base rental, which ranges from $8-$10,000 over the term of the lease, as well as payment of property taxes on the facility.
  ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
 
 (a) On August 6, 2009, Board of Directors of the Registrant dismissed Moore & Associates Chartered, its independent registered public account firm. On the same date, August 6, 2009, the accounting firm of Seale and Beers, CPAs was engaged as the Registrant's new independent registered public accounting firm. The Board of Directors of the Registrant and the Registrant's Audit Committee approved of the dismissal of Moore & Associates Chartered and the engagement of Seale and Beers, CPAs as its independent auditor. None of the reports of Moore & Associates Chartered on the Company's financial statements for either of the past two years or subsequent interim period contained an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, or was qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, except that the Registrant's audited financial statements contained in its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 a going concern qualification in the registrant's audited financial statements.
 
 During the registrant's two most recent fiscal years and the subsequent interim periods thereto, there were no disagreements with Moore and Associates, Chartered whether or not resolved, on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which, if not resolved to Moore and Associates, Chartered's satisfaction, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with its report on the registrant's financial statements nor were there any up to and including the time of dismissal on August 6, 2009.
 
 On August 6, 2009, the registrant engaged Seale and Beers, CPAs as its independent accountant. During the two most recent fiscal years and the interim periods preceding the engagement, the registrant has not consulted Seale and Beers, CPAs regarding any of the matters set forth in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.
 
 The Company dismissed Seale and Beers, CPA as our independent accountant and retained the independent registered public accounting firm, Gately & Associates, LLC as of August 14, 2009.
 
 On May 14, 2010, we dismissed Gately & Associates, LLC as our independent registered public accounting firm.  The Company’s Board of Directors participated in and approved the decision to change our independent registered public accounting firm.
  On May 14, 2010, the Board of Directors appointed WithumSmith + Brown, PC (“Withum”) as the Company’s new independent registered public accounting firm. The decision to engage (“Withum”) was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors on May 14, 2010.  Prior to May 14, 2010, the Company did not consult with Withum regarding (1) the application of accounting principles to a specified transactions, (2) the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements, (3) written or oral advice was provided that would be an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to an accounting, auditing or financial reporting issues, or (4) any matter that was the subject of a disagreement between the Company and its predecessor auditor as described in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) or a reportable event as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.
  43
  ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
 Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
  Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
  Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), as of December 31, 2009. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officers have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are ineffective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules.
  MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
  Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act over the registrant. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is intended to be designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements in accordance with United State’s generally accepted accounting principles (US GAAP), including those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company, (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with US GAAP and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company, and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.  Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control— Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Management’s assessment included an evaluation of the design of our internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009. Based on this assessment, Management concluded that the Company’s internal controls were not effective and contain significant deficiencies, in part as a result of the material weakness discussed below.
  Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.  This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report.
   44
  Management’s Discussion of Material Weakness
  Management has identified the following groups of control deficiencies, each of which, in the aggregate, represents a material weakness in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009:
  
Material journal entries identified and recorded as a result of audit procedures



Restatement of previously issued financial statements



Overall ineffective oversight of the financial reporting process including:



·Omitted disclosures for related party transactions, loss contingencies and accounting policies.



·Controls over accounting for acquisitions.



·Timing and proper recording of equity transactions.



·Documentation of material transactions related to acquisitions.
 Management of the Company takes very seriously the strength and reliability of the of the internal control environment for the Company. During 2010, the Company intends to undertake steps necessary to improve the control environment that include:
  
Strengthening the effectiveness of corporate governance by hiring a new CFO and establishing an audit committee of the Board.



Engaging a non-independent PCAOB registered accounting firm to provide accounting advice to Management.



Assigning additional members of the Management team to assist in preparing and reviewing the ongoing financial reporting process.
 Management acknowledges its responsibility for internal controls over financial reporting and seeks to continually improve these controls. In order to achieve compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act, we are performing system and process documentation and evaluation needed to comply with Section 404, which is both costly and challenging. We believe our process for documenting, evaluating and monitoring our internal control over financial reporting is consistent with the objectives of Section 404 of the Act.
  Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
  The Company has continued to take remediation steps discussed in Management’s Discussion of Material Weakness above to enhance its internal control over financial reporting and reduce control deficiencies. The remediation efforts were slowed as a result of trying to integrate the operations of the Company’s acquisitions and to streamline the resulting organization.  We will continue to work on the elimination of control weaknesses and deficiencies noted. We believe the steps taken thus far to enhance our internal control over financial reporting have reduced or control deficiencies.
  ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
 
 None.
  45
  PART III
 
 ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
 
 The following table sets forth, as of December 15, 2010, the names and ages of all of our directors and executive officers; and all positions and offices held.  The director will hold such office until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until his or her successor has been elected and qualified.
 
 Name

Age

Position

Present Position Held SinceJohn Bordynuik

40

President, CEO and Director

April 2009Ron Baldwin Jr.

51

Chief Financial Officer

January 2010Jacob Smith

55

Chief Operating Officer and Director

January 2010
 
 John M. Wesson

57

Independent Director
February 2010
 
 Robin Bagai

59

Independent Director
May 2010
  Family Relationships
 
 There are no family relationships between any of the Company’s directors or officers.
 
 Business Experience
 
 The following summarizes the occupation and business experience of our officers and directors:
 
 John Bordynuik, President, & Chief Executive Officer, Chief and Director
 
 John Bordynuik was the founding CEO and President of John Bordynuik Inc., a Delaware corporation, which is no longer actively operating. Mr. Bordynuik developed highly sophisticated technology to address issues related to MIT and NASA’s legacy computer data contained on 30-40 year old tapes, and has since recovered thousands of tapes from the 1960's to 1990's.  Mr. Bordynuik did not have a contract with, and was not compensated by, MIT. During 1990-2001, Mr. Bordynuik was employed by the Ontario Legislative Assembly, Queen's Park, Toronto, in Research and Development. Mr. Bordynuik has recovered data from old media for the past 20 years to amass a large solution and algorithm archive.
 
 Mr. Bordynuik was granted a broad US patent (7,115,872) for a dirty bomb detector in 2006.
 
 Mr. Bordynuik is qualified and capable to perform his duties on the board because of his many years in the technology sector as an innovator and entrepreneur. Because of his past accomplishments commercializing new technologies, Mr. Bordynuik is quite capable of making decisions for the best interest of the company and, when necessary, to engage third party professionals who will perform their respective duties for the best interest of the company.
  Ronald C. Baldwin, Jr., Chief Financial Officer
 
 Mr. Baldwin is a CPA with 15 years experience in public accounting. Mr. Baldwin is licensed to practice accounting in Florida and North Carolina and law in Florida. Mr. Baldwin holds a B.S. in Accounting magna cum laude from the University of South Florida and a J.D. and L.L.M in Taxation cum laude from the University of Florida. Mr. Baldwin was admitted to the Florida Bar in 2000.
  46
  From 1991 to 2005, Mr. Baldwin was a staff accountant at Baldwin & Weber, CPA’s and then a partner in R.C. Baldwin, CPA’s providing management advisory services to small and medium sized business clients. From 2005 to 2007, Mr. Baldwin was the Manager of Taxation at Moore, Stephens, Lovelace, P.A., a regional CPA firm with offices in Miami, Orlando, and Tampa. From 2007 to 2009, Mr. Baldwin was the Vice President of Finance at Hegemon Capital, a special opportunity hedge fund that was involved in over $100 million in loan placements and equity investments.
 
 Jacob Smith,Chief Operating Officer and Director
 
 Dr. Smith received a Masters Degree from the University of Chicago and a Doctor-Medical from Michigan State University in 2002. He obtained Certificates from Cambridge University in 2006 and from the National Institute of Health/FDA in 2007. Business Certificates were received from Oxford University in 2007 and Harvard University in 2009. Dr. Smith then received an MBA from Ashford University in 2009.
 
 From 2000-2006 he served as a medical/surgical resident. He obtained and managed $8 million of federal funds while prioritizing HIV/AIDS care services and developing a comprehensive strategic long-range plan for Southeastern Michigan HIV/AIDS Council. During this time, he also managed and conducted clinical trial research.
 
 From 2006 to 2009, Dr. Smith served as President and CEO of the Goldenburg Company LLC.  During this time he also served as an instructor in Business, Biology, and Healthcare at Davenport University, Livonia, Michigan, conducting courses in Management, Microeconomics, Macroeconomics, Healthcare, Biology, Anatomy, and Physiology.
 
 Dr. Smith is qualified and capable to perform his duties on the board because of his extensive educational background in various medical and business related fields. Because of his academic achievements and work in healthcare field, Dr. Smith is quite capable of making decisions for the best interest of the company and its shareholders.
  John M. Wesson, Director
 
 JBI's first appointed independent Board member is John M. Wesson, a 1980 graduate from Drew University, Madison, N.J. with a B.A., Psychology and Minor in Ethics.  Mr. Wesson is a BSA Associate (Bank Secrecy Act) at Bank Leumi USA in New York City. Given this designation, he works closely with such regulatory agencies as FINCEN (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network) and Treasury (OFAC).
 
 Additionally, Mr. Wesson served in the Army Security Agency from 1972 to 1976, on loan to the National Security Agency and then served 2 years in inactive reserves.
 
 Mr. Wesson continued his military service by serving in the Regular Army, Military Intelligence from 1986 to 1991. He was deployed to serve 6 months in Kuwait & Iraq during Desert Storm, as Squad Leader.
 
 Mr. Wesson is qualified and capable to perform his duties on the board because of his educational and military background and banking experience at Bank Leumi in Los Angeles and New York City, where he was responsible for various branch operations and compliance initiatives. Because of his progressive managing and supervisory experience, Mr. Wesson will exercise his duty of care and duty of loyalty as an independent director in the best interests of the JBI and its shareholders.
  Robin Bagai, Director
 
 Dr. Robin Bagai, Psy.D.age 59, is a clinical psychologist in private practice in Portland, Oregon. Since 1992 Dr. Bagai has specialized in diagnostic testing and evaluation of adults and adolescents throughout Oregon. He has been an adjunct professor at Portland State University, supervising graduate students in the department of Counselor Education. Dr. Bagai has previously served on the boards of the Portland Psychological Association (PPA) and the Portland Alliance for the Advancement of Psychodynamic Psychotherapy (PAAPP).
  47
  Dr. Bagai received his Master’s degree in Counseling Psychology from Antioch University, Seattle in 1986, and his Doctorate in Clinical Psychology from Pacific University School of Professional Psychology, Forest Grove, in 1990. Dr. Bagai was licensed in Oregon in 1992.
 
 Dr. Bagai is qualified and capable to perform his duties on the board because of his extensive educational background and his establishment and management of his private clinical practice. Because of his experience as an entrepreneur and a professor, Dr. Bagai will exercise his duty of care and duty of loyalty as an independent director in the best interests of the JBI and its shareholders.
  COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
 
 Each of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nomination Committee are composed of a majority of independent board members and are also chaired by an independent board member.
 
 Audit Committee
 John Wesson (Chairman)
 Robin Bagai
 
 Compensation Committee
 John Wesson (Chairman)
 Robin Bagai
 
 Nomination Committee
 Robin Bagai (Chairman)
 John Wesson
 
 Other Officers and Significant Employees:
 
 Amy Bradshaw, Vice President of Sales and Marketing
 
 Ms. Bradshaw has extensive experience in consulting and industry.  Ms. Bradshaw has contributed and managed in a variety of corporate functions including accounting, finance, purchasing, professional services and marketing.  Her previous employers include PricewaterhouseCoopers, Arthur Andersen and Cerner Corporation. Ms. Bradshaw managed a $65 million business unit that experienced growth in revenue, margin and operating income while under her leadership.
 
 Ms. Bradshaw completed her undergraduate studies at Miami University.  Graduating magna cum laude, Ms. Bradshaw earned dual bachelor degrees in Manufacturing Engineering and Accountancy.  She went on to become a Certified Public Accountant and maintains membership in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  Ms. Bradshaw completed her MBA at the University of Virginia's Darden School of Business.
 
 Ms. Bradshaw currently serves on the Board of Directors of Consensus, a non-profit organization with the purpose of increasing public engagement in policymaking.  She is a member of the United Way's Young Leaders Society, volunteering her time to children's organizations and assisting in fundraising for the local arts community.
  48
  ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
 
 The table below summarizes all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our executive officers by any person for all services rendered in all capacities to us for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. The following summary compensation table sets forth all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to the named executive officers paid by us during the year ended December 31, 2009, in all capacities for the accounts of our executives, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO):
 
 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
 
 Name and Principal Position

Year

Salary

($)

Bonus

($)

Stock

Awards

($)

Option Awards

($)

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings

($)

All Other Compensation

($)

Totals

($)John Bordynuik, President, Chief Executive Officer

and Director

2009

$
0

0

0

0

0

0

0

$
0Ronald Baldwin, Jr.

Chief Financial Officer

2009

$
36000

0

0

0

0

0

0

$
36000Dr. Jacob Smith,

Chief Operating Officer

2009

$
16000

0

0

0

0

0

0

$
16000
 
 Option Grants Table.There were no individual grants of stock options to purchase our common stock made to the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table through December 31, 2009.
 
 Aggregated Option Exercises and Fiscal Year-End Option Value Table.There were no stock options exercised during period ending December 31, 2009, by the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table.
 
 Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) Awards Table.There were no awards made to a named executive officers in the last completed fiscal year under any LTIP
 
 Compensation of Directors
  Directors are permitted to receive fixed fees and other compensation for their services as directors. The Board of Directors has the authority to fix the compensation of directors. No amounts have been paid to, or accrued to, directors in such capacity.
  49
  Employment Contracts
 
 On October 1, 2009, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”) with Mr. Baldwin, The Company subsequently assigned Mr. Baldwin to its wholly owned subsidiary Pak-It, LLC to serve as Pak-It’s Chief Financial Officer.
 
 Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, Mr. Baldwin will serve a three year term at an annual base salary of $144,000. Mr. Baldwin’s annual salary is subject to review by the Company’s Board of Directors on an annual basis; however, the annual base salary shall not be less than $144,000 for any annual period. Mr. Baldwin was responsible for implementing financial reporting software with the Company's engineers as well as financial and audit controls for the Company and all of its subsidiaries.
 
 In addition, the Company, Mr Baldwin and the law firm of MacFarlane, Ferguson & McMullen (the “Escrow Agent”) entered into an escrow agreement (the “Escrow Agreement”), whereby the Company has deposited $144,000 with the Escrow Agent representing a severance amount to be paid to Mr. Baldwin under certain circumstances set forth in the Employment Agreement.
 
 On May 19, 2010, the Company entered into an employment agreement with John Bordynuik, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer.
 
 The agreement has a five year term and may be extended upon the mutual agreement of the Company and Mr. Bordynuik. Pursuant to the agreement, Mr. Bordynuik will be paid an annual salary of $180,000, which shall commence upon issuance of a production permit for the Company’s first Plastic2Oil processor. In addition, Mr. Bordynuik has been granted option awards which vest and are contingent upon specific milestone achievements of the Company.
 
 Stock Option Grants
  There were no stock options granted on common shares in fiscal year 2009, with respect to the Chief Executive Officer and the other named executives listed in the Summary Compensation Table.
  Stock Option Exercised
  There were no stock options exercised on common shares in fiscal year 2009, with respect to the Chief Executive Officer and the other named executives listed in the Summary Compensation Table.
  Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
  None
  Aggregated Option Exercises and Fiscal Year-End Option Values
  None
  Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards Table
  We do not have any Long-Term Incentive Plans.
  Pension Benefits Table
  None
  Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table
  None
  50
  All Other Compensation Table
  None
  Perquisites Table
  None
  Potential Payments Upon Termination Or Change In Control Table
  None.
  Code of Ethics
  We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to all of our executive officers, directors and employees. Code of ethics codifies the business and ethical principles that govern all aspects of our business. This document will be made available in print, free of charge, to any shareholder requesting a copy in writing from the Company. A copy of our code of ethics was with the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed on March 2, 2007.
  ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
 
 The following table provides the names and addresses of each person known to us to own more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock as of July 8, 2010, and by the officers and directors, individually and as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, all shares are owned directly.
 
 The address of each owner who is an officer or director is c/o the Company at 1783 Allanport Road, Thorold, Ontario L0S 1K0, Canada.
  Title of Class
Name of Beneficial Owner (1)

Number of

shares
Percent of

Class (2)Common
John Bordynuik, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, President


9,273,846

18
%Common
Ron Baldwin, Jr. Chief Financial Officer


0

0
%Common
Jacob Smith, Chief Operating Officer, Director


100,000

Less than 1
%Common
Robin Bagai, Director


41,040

Less than 1
%Common
John Wesson, Director


825,004

1
%Series A Super Voting

Preferred Stock
John Bordynuik


1,000,000

100
%All officers and directors as a group (6 persons)


10,304,890

20
%All officers, directors and 5% holders as a group (6 persons)


10,304,890

20
%
  (1)
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3(a) of the Exchange Act and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities.(2)
Based on 51,241,926 common shares issued and outstanding as of December 10, 2010 and 1,000,000 Series A Super Voting Preferred Stock issued and outstanding.
  51
  
 Changes in Control
 
 We are not aware of any arrangements that may result in a change in control of the Company.
  DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES
 
 General
 
 As of December 10, 2010, our authorized capitalization was 155,000,000 shares of capital stock, consisting of 150,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share.
 
 Common Stock
 
 We are authorized to issue 150,000,000 shares of common stock, $.001 par value per share. As of the date hereof, 51,241,926 common shares are issued and outstanding.
  Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote for each share on all matters submitted to a stockholder vote.  Holders of common stock do not have cumulative voting rights.  Therefore, holders of a majority of the shares of common stock voting for the election of directors cannot necessarily elect all of the directors. Holders of our common stock representing a majority of the voting power of our capital stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote, represented in person or by proxy, are necessary to constitute a quorum at any meeting of our stockholders. A vote by the holders of a majority of our outstanding shares is required to effectuate certain fundamental corporate changes such as liquidation, merger or an amendment to our Articles of Incorporation.
  Holders of common stock are entitled to share in all dividends that the board of directors, in its discretion, declares from legally available funds. In the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up, each outstanding share entitles its holder to participate pro rata in all assets that remain after payment of liabilities and after providing for each class of stock, if any, having preference over the common stock. Holders of our common stock have no pre-emptive rights, no conversion rights and there are no redemption provisions applicable to our common stock.
  Preferred Stock
  We are authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $.001 par value per share.  As of the date hereof, 1,000,000 Series A Super Voting Preferred Shares are issued and outstanding. Holders of the Series A Super Voting Preferred Shares have one hundred (100) times the number of votes that holders of common stock are entitled to on all matters submitted to shareholders for their action or consideration.
  Subject to the approval of the then current shareholders, the Board of Directors is empowered to designate and issue from time to time one or more classes or series of Preferred Stock and to fix and determine the relative rights, preferences, designations, qualifications, privileges, options, conversion rights, limitations and other special or relative rights of each such class or series so authorized. If approved by the shareholders, such action could adversely affect the voting power and other rights of the holders of the Company’s capital shares or could have the effect of discouraging or making difficult any attempt by a person or group to obtain control of the Company.
  Dividend Policy
  It is unlikely that we will declare or pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We intend to retain earnings, if any, to expand our operations.
  52
  ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPSAND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
 
 On April 24, 2009, John Bordynuik purchased 40,250,000 shares of the Company common stock, representing 63.19% voting interest from then President and Chief Executive Officer, Nicole Wright.  Simultaneously, the officers and directors resigned and appointed Mr. Bordynuik as the Company’s sole officer and director. On June 30, 2009, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement whereby the Company agreed to sell 66,667 shares of the Company’s common stock to John Bordynuik, Inc. (“JBI”), a Delaware corporation controlled by Mr. Bordynuik for an aggregate value of $200,000.
 
 On July 15, 2009, the Company closed on an asset purchase agreement to purchase and assume certain assets of John Bordynuik, Inc., in exchange for the issuance of 809,593 shares of the Company’s common stock.
 
 As of June 30, 2009, $71,538 of stockholder loan payable to John Bordynuik, Inc. was used as operating expenses. On June 30, 2009, the Company issued 23,846 shares of restricted common stock in satisfaction of stockholder loans payable for a value of principal and interest in the amount of $71,538, or $3.00 per share.
 
 In July 2009, the Company entered into a lease agreement to rent office space of 790 sq. ft. in Cambridge, Massachusetts for a base term of 12 months.  The sole officer and director, John Bordynuik, prepaid the office rental expenses for the term of the lease.
 
 During December 2009, the Company issued Mr. Bordynuik 1 million shares of Series A Super Voting Preferred Stock (“Preferred shares”) in exchange for the return of 30,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.  Preferred shares have no conversion or dividend rights, but carry 100 to 1 voting rights (as compared to common shares). Further, Mr. Bordynuik returned and retired 9,970,000 common shares to the Company during 2009, and an additional 21,000,000 shares were returned to the Company and retired in March, 2010.
 
 During 2009, the Company’s President and CEO, who is also a majority shareholder, paid for direct labor costs associated with the reading of tapes, for which he was not reimbursed. The total costs amounted to $42,061 and have been recorded as a capital contribution. There were no amounts for 2008.
 
 In the first quarter of 2010, the Company issued 404,700 shares of Common Stock to officers and key employees as compensation.
 
 Except as set forth above, none of the following persons has any direct or indirect material interest in any transaction to which we are a party since our incorporation or in any proposed transaction to which we are proposed to be a party:
 
 (A)
Any of our directors or officers;(B)
Any proposed nominee for election as our director;(C)
Any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, shares carrying more than 10% of the voting rights attached to our Common Stock; or(D)
Any relative or spouse of any of the foregoing persons, or any relative of such spouse, who has the same address as any of our directors or officers.
  53
  ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
 
 As outlined in the table below, we incurred the following fees for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, for professional services rendered by WithumSmith+Brown, PC our independent registered accounting firm, for the audit of the Company's annual financial statements and for audit-related services, tax services and all other services, as applicable.
 
 Service Provided
Fiscal 2009

Fiscal 2008(2)Audit Fees(1)Annual Audit
$176,300

$
*Audit Related FeesAssurances and Related Sources
52,000

*Tax Fees)Tax Services
0


*All Other FeesFees for other services
0

*Total Fees
$228,300


*
 
 (1) Audit fees for fiscal year 2009 and 2008 include professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm and third party accounting services for the annual audit of the Company’s financial statements and internal controls and the reviews of the financial statements included in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.
 
 (2) The Company effected a change of control in 2009 and the current management does not have this information.
 
 The Company’s Audit Committee has policies and procedures that require the pre-approval by the Audit Committee of all fees paid to, and all services performed by, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. At the beginning of each year, the Audit Committee approves the proposed services, including the nature, type and scope of services contemplated and the related fees, to be rendered by these firms during the year. In addition, Audit Committee pre-approval is also required for those engagements that may arise during the course of the year that are outside the scope of the initial services and fees initially pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
  54
  PART IV
 
 ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
 
 Exhibits
 
 2.1
Securities Purchase Agreement between 310 Holdings, Inc. and Domark International, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on August 28, 2009).3.1
Amended Articles of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on October 6, 2010)3.2
Bylaws (Incorporated by reference to the Form. SB2 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 11, 2006.)10.1
Asset Purchase Agreement *10.2
Unit Purchase Agreement by and among 310 Holdings, Inc., Pak-It, LLC and the Pak-It, LLC Unitholders**10.3
Loan Agreement**10.4
Pledge Escrow Agreement**10.5
Security Agreement Inventory**10.6
Security Agreement Equipment**10.7
Security Agreement Accounts, General Intangibles, Contract Rights**10.8
$1,200,000 Note**10.9
$2,665,000 Liability Note**10.10
Stock Purchase Agreement (incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on July 1, 2009)21.1
JBI RE ONE Inc., an Ontario, Canada corporation21.2
Plastic2Oil Land, Inc., a Nevada corporation21.3
Plastic2Oil Marine, Inc. a Nevada corporation21.4
PAK-IT, LLC a Florida corporation21.5
Javaco, Inc., an Ohio corporation21.6
Plastic2Oil of NY #1, LLC a New York corporation21.7
JBI RE #1, Inc., a New York corporation21.8
JBI (Canada), Inc., an Ontario, Canada corporation31.1
Rule 1 3a-14(a)/15d- 14(a) Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer31.2
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer32.1
Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer32.2
Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
 
 * Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on June 26, 2009.
 ** Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K October 1, 2009.
  55
  Signatures
 
 Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report has been signed on its behalf  by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 JBI, INC.
 
 Date: December 15, 2010
By:
/s/John BordynuikName: John BordynuikTitle: President, CEO, Director

(Principal Executive Officer)
 
 Date: December 15, 2010
By:
/s/Ron Baldwin, Jr.Name: Ron Baldwin, Jr.Title: Chief Financial Officer
  Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
  Signature

Title

Date/s/ Ron Baldwin, Jr.

Chief Financial Officer

December 15, 2010Ron Baldwin, Jr.

Principal Accounting Officer/s/ John Bordynuik

Director and Chairman of the Board;

December 15, 2010John Bordynuik

President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Jacob Smith

Chief Operating Officer and Director

December 15, 2010Jacob Smith/s/ Robin Bagai

Director

December 15, 2010Robin Bagai/s/ John Wesson

Director

December 15, 2010John Wesson




56