alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage Servicing**D1086-120, 12th Floor550 South Tryon StreetCharlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 **ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**  Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling  and  Servicing  Agreement  dated as of September 1, 2014, by and among Deutsche Mortgage& Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-LC17 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that: 1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its  performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.  /s/ Daniel BoberDaniel BoberExecutive Vice PresidentWells Fargo Bank   

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
bedu-ex414_506.htm



Exhibit 4.14

Rights and Obligations Assumption Letter

 

This entity, Kaiping Country Garden Jade Bay Kindergarten, is the subsidiary established by BGY Education Investment Management Co., Ltd. (“Investor”) and registered at Kaiping City’s branch office of the Ministry of Civil Affairs on July 3, 2017.The Investor holds 100% of the interests in this entity. 

In accordance with the Exclusive Management Service and Business Cooperation Agreement (“Agreement”) entered into by and between Investor, Zhuhai Hengqin Bright Scholar Management Consulting Co., Ltd. and other relevant parties on January 25, 2017, this entity shall join the Agreement according to Article 10.1 of the Agreement as a “New Subsidiary of Party B” under the Agreement. 

This entity hereby agrees to join the Agreement as a new Subsidiary of Party B of the Investor, enjoy the rights under the Agreement, and perform the obligations according to the Agreement. This Assumption Letter came into effect upon the date of execution. 

 

Kaiping Country Garden Jade Bay Kindergarten 

(Seal) Kaiping Country Garden Jade Bay Kindergarten Affixed

 


	
By:
	
 
	
/s/ Guifang Zhong 

	
Name:
	
 
	
Guifang Zhong

	
Title:
	
 
	
Legal Representative

	
Date:
	
 
	
July 5, 2017
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 256 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 256

     Expressing the sense of Congress with regard to Lifer Groups.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 31, 1998

 Mr. Conyers submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
     Expressing the sense of Congress with regard to Lifer Groups.

Whereas wardens have found that prisoners serving life terms (lifers) tend to be 
        more reliable and less prone to disruptive behavior than most other 
        prisoners;
Whereas lifers have been organizing themselves into Lifer Groups since the 
        1960's;
Whereas Lifer Groups have been vehicles for many imaginative and creative 
        programs by prisoners, including--
            (1) counseling programs for inner city youths at risk;
            (2) workshop programs supplying prosthetic and other equipment to 
        hospitals and health centers and toys to child care centers and 
        children's hospitals; and
            (3) providing entertainment and cultural awareness to their fellow 
        prisoners in the form of dramatic productions and poetry groups;
Whereas the products and programs that Lifer Groups produce are conspicuous 
        examples of prisoner accomplishment, achieved in democratic 
        organizations, and therefore serve as models for other prisoners to 
        emulate;
Whereas members of Lifer Groups are frequently able to calm and counsel young 
        offenders, thus aiding the preservation of order in our prisons;
Whereas with the increasing number of life sentences and the virtual elimination 
        of parole for lifers, those serving life sentences will make up an 
        increasing proportion of our prison population;
Whereas with increasing numbers of lifers facing the certainty of dying in 
        prison, there is danger that previously cooperative and dependable 
        prisoners will become a less useful, and even antagonistic population;
Whereas a lively, vibrant Lifer Group will do much to prevent this result, at 
        the same time providing prisoners with a chance to partially recompense 
        society for the wrong they have done; and
Whereas Lifer Groups need as much autonomy, self-financing, and outside 
        sponsorship as is consistent with security: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that the departments of corrections of 
the various States and the Bureau of Prisons of the Federal Government 
should encourage the formation of Lifer Groups in penal institutions 
and provide as much help for them as is possible and consistent with 
their reasonable organizational autonomy.
                                 <all>
```
Order filed, January 10, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00808-CR

____________

TRAVOY RAMON HOLLIE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 248th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1326496

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due December 27, 2012. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Louise Steckler, the official court reporter, to file the record in 

this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM EXCITE,
INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q/A FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          20,168
<SECURITIES>                                    16,901
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,570
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,480)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,234
<PP&E>                                          33,927
<DEPRECIATION>                                (13,722)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 192,887
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,895
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        813
<COMMON>                                       260,353
<OTHER-SE>                                   (123,289)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   192,887
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,006
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,053
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                65,654
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   439
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 843
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (23,574)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (23,574)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (23,574)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.54)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.54)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>IN JUNE 1998, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS DECLARED A TWO-FOR-ONE STOCK SPLIT
WHICH WAS IN THE FORM OF A 100% STOCK DIVIDEND. IN ACCORDANCE WITH REGULATION
S-K ITEM 601, PRIOR PERIOD FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULES HAVE NOT BEEN RESTATED FOR
THE STOCK SPLIT.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 11

                           GATEWAY  BANCSHARES,  INC.
           CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                   (unaudited)

The following tabulation presents the calculation of basic and diluted earnings
per common share for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2002 and 2001.


                                                           Three Months Ended
                                                         ----------------------
                                                         March 31,   March 31,
                                                            2002        2001
                                                         ----------  ----------
<S>                                                      <C>         <C>
Basic net income                                         $  308,907  $  163,814
                                                         ==========  ==========

Basic earnings on common shares                          $  308,907  $  163,814
                                                         ==========  ==========

Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic           681,577     679,048
                                                         ==========  ==========

Basic earnings per common share                          $     0.45  $     0.24
                                                         ==========  ==========

Basic net income per common share                        $     0.45  $     0.24
                                                         ==========  ==========

Diluted net income                                       $  308,907  $  163,814
                                                         ==========  ==========

Diluted earnings on common shares                        $  308,907  $  163,814
                                                         ==========  ==========

Weighted average common shares outstanding, diluted         688,846     681,678
                                                         ==========  ==========

Diluted earnings per common share                        $     0.45  $     0.24
                                                         ==========  ==========

Diluted net income per common share                      $     0.45  $     0.24
                                                         ==========  ==========
</TABLE>


                                      -17-
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned officer of USA Capital Management, Inc.. (the "Company"), hereby
certify to my knowledge that:



The Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2017 of
the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.



| | /s/ Richard Meruelo    
| | -----------------------
| | Chief Executive Officer
| | Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 03, 2018
Order entered April 23, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 00219
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF H .B.R., A CHILD On Appeal from the 469th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 469
- 56844
- 2017

ORDER As directed to do so, appellant has filed written verification that he ha s paid
all estimated fees f

or the reporter ’s record

. Accordingly, we ORDER Stephanie M. Hunn, Official Court Reporter for the 469 th Judicial District Court, to file the reporter’s record no later than May 13, 2020.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Hunn and the parties.
/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
#### John Michael CRIM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MANAGEMENT & TRAINING CORPORATION; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-16676

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed January 5, 2018

John Michael Crim, Pro Se

Heidi Adams, Attorney, San Francisco, CA, Dale Patrick, Esquire, Taft Correctional Institution, Taft, CA, for Defendants-Appellees

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P, 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

John Michael Crim, a former federal prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action alleging federal and state law violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a dismissal for failure to comply with a court order. *Pagtalunan v. Galaza,*291 F.3d 639, 640 (9th Cir. 2002). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Crim’s action because Crim failed to comply with a court order and meet deadlines, despite being warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal. *See id,*at 642-43 (discussing the five factors for determining whether to dismiss for failure to comply with a court order); *Ferdik v. Bonzelet,*963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992) (although dismissal is a harsh penalty, the district court’s dismissal should not be disturbed absent “a definite and firm conviction” that it “committed a clear error of judgment” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)).

We reject as without merit Crim’s contentions that he was denied due process or deprived of any rights or privileges.

*458We do not consider the district court’s order denying Crim’s request to use electronic filing because Crim did not file an amended notice of appeal. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(4)(B)(ii).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6535 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6535

To require the President to obtain written approval from the Secretary 
   of Defense and the Secretary of State prior to the use of nuclear 
         weapons by the United States, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 27, 2016

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed 
Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the President to obtain written approval from the Secretary 
   of Defense and the Secretary of State prior to the use of nuclear 
         weapons by the United States, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nuclear Sanity Act''.

SEC. 2. NUCLEAR WEAPON USE APPROVAL PROCESS.

    (a) In General.--Except in a case of a physical attack on the 
territory of the United States by the military force of a foreign 
government, or in a case in which it is impossible for the President to 
establish communications with the Secretary of Defense and the 
Secretary of State for a 24-hour period, the President shall obtain the 
approval of the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State prior 
to the use of nuclear weapons by the United States.
    (b) Form of Approval.--The approval under this section shall be in 
writing unless the approving official deems approval in writing 
impracticable, in which case it may be oral. Written approval under 
this section may be transmitted to the President by electronic means.
    (c) Violations.--
            (1) The United States military shall disregard all orders 
        from the President in violation of this section.
            (2) Any violation or attempted violation of this section 
        shall be deemed a ``high crime or misdemeanor'' under the 
        United States Constitution.
    (d) Definition.--In this section, the term ``territory of the 
United States'' means the States, the District of Columbia, Puerto 
Rico, and the territories of the United States, whether or not 
incorporated or organized.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Powerhouse  Technologies  Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, David R. Wells, Vice President Finance  Operations  (Principal  Financial and
Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ David R. Wells*
---------------------
David R. Wells
Vice President Finance Operations
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Date: December 8, 2004

*     This page was previously filed without proper signature notation as a
      result of an error by the EDGAR filing service company.
```

[Federal Register: April 15, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 72)]
[Notices]
[Page 19630]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr15ap10-34]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board Charter
Renewal

    Pursuant to Section 14(a)(2)(A) of the Federal Advisory Committee
Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463), and in accordance with Title 41 of the Code
of Federal Regulations, section 102-3.65(a), and following consultation
with the Committee Management Secretariat, General Services
Administration, notice is hereby given that the Environmental
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board will be renewed for a two-year
period beginning April 11, 2010.
    The Board provides the Assistant Secretary for Environmental
Management (EM) with information, advice, and recommendations
concerning issues affecting the EM program at various sites. These
site-specific issues include clean-up standards and environmental
restoration; waste management and disposition; stabilization and
disposition of non-stockpile nuclear materials; excess facilities;
future land use and long-term stewardship; risk assessment and
management; and clean-up science and technology activities.
    Additionally, the renewal of the Environmental Management Site-
Specific Advisory Board has been determined to be essential to conduct
Department of Energy business and to be in the public interest in
connection with the performance of duties imposed on the Department of
Energy by law and agreement. The Board will operate in accordance with
the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, and rules and
regulations issued in implementation of that Act. Further information
regarding this Advisory Board may be obtained from Ms. Catherine
Alexander Brennan, Designated Federal Officer, at (202) 586-7711.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 11, 2010.
Carol A. Matthews,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-8658 Filed 4-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
No. D-2652.

#### In re Disbarment of Holmes.

Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 566 U. S. 934.]
* 

### Pursuant to 5 TH 

### C IR



### . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this o pinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limit ed circumstances set forth in 5 TH 

### C IR 

### R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-20525

Summary Calendar

JOE B. RAMON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GILBERT F. CASELLAS, Chairman,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 97-CV-1842

November 23, 1998

Before KING, BARKSDALE , and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appellant, Joe B. Ramon appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration. We

review the district court’s denial of a motion for reconsideration under an abuse of discretion standard. S ee

Midland West Corp. v. F.D.I.C.

, 911 F.2d 1141, 1145 n. 4 (5 th Cir. 1990)(Rule 59(e) motion); Williams v.

Brown & Root, Inc.

, 828 F.2d 325, 328 (5 th Cir. 1987)(Rule 60(b) motion). We find that through the exercise

of reasonable diligence, Ramon could have prosecuted his case; therefore, we affirm the judgment of the district

court.

AFFIRMED.