alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1

                               TALK VISUAL CORPORATION
                               -----------------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Talk Visual Corporation (the "Company")  Quarterly Report
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harley L. Rollins,
Chief  Executive  Offer and Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  Company,  certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1).      The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2).      The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: August 9, 2002             By:  /s/ HARLEY L. ROLLINS
                                      ---------------------------
                                          Harley L. Rollins
                                          Chief Executive Officer and
                                          Chief Financial Officer

17
<PAGE>
No. 11-9821.

#### Martin *v.*Hartley, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

                              This schedule contains summary financial
                              information extracted from the unaudited balance
                              sheet of Lucent at June 30, 1997 and the unaudited
                              consolidated statement of income for the
                              nine-month period ended June 30, 1997 and is
                              qualified in its entirety by reference to such
                              financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                      OCT-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                    1,467
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                             5,345
<ALLOWANCES>                                334
<INVENTORY>                               2,969
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         12,362
<PP&E>                                   11,303
<DEPRECIATION>                            6,418
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           22,873
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     9,265
<BONDS>                                   1,682
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                      6
<OTHER-SE>                                3,837
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             22,873
<SALES>                                  19,427
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         19,427
<CGS>                                    11,017
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            11,017
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          6,417
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             95
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          233
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           1,850
<INCOME-TAX>                                712
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       1,138
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                              1,138
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              1.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Toll-Free Phone Lines Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. Due to unavoidable delays in this year's approval process, we will not be able to meet the 15-calendar notice threshold, but this meeting will still be open. This meeting will still be held via teleconference.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, March 31, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rosalind Matherne at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4115.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Phone Lines Project Committee will be held Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with Rosalind Matherne. For more information please contact Rosalind Matherne at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4115, or write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     The agenda will include various IRS issues.                

Dated: March 17, 2022.

Kevin Brown,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2022-06114 Filed 3-22-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Alfred James Williams

, * From the 350th District

Court of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 10254

- D

.

Vs. No. 11

- 12

- 00335

- CR * March 31, 2015

The State of Texas

, * Memorandum Opinion by Willson , J

. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that

there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this

court ’ s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<LEGEND/>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          26,511                  26,511
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,729                   1,729
<ALLOWANCES>                                       277                     277
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,517                  28,517
<PP&E>                                           3,204                   3,204
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,746                   1,746
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,989                  29,989
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,546                   4,546
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        44,362                  44,362
<OTHER-SE>                                    (18,919)                (18,919)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,989                  29,989
<SALES>                                          2,046                   3,910
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,046                   3,910
<CGS>                                              837                   1,739
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      837                   1,739
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,799                   7,665
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (369)                   (773)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,221)                 (4,721)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,221)                 (4,721)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,221)                 (4,721)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.26)                  (0.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)                  (0.56)
        

</TABLE>
#### Antonia Elizabeth RIVAS-RIVERA; Daniela Izamar Rivas-Rivera, Petitioners v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. Attorney General, Respondent

No. 17-60128 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed January 30, 2018

Gino Mario Mesa, Esq., Law Office of Gino M. Mesa, Houston, TX, for Petitioners

John Frederick Stanton, John Beadle Holt, Esq., Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Antonia Elizabeth Rivas-Rivera and her minor daughter, Daniela Izamar Rivas-Rivera, both natives and citizens of El *230Salvador, petition this court for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing their appeal of the immigration judge’s (IJ) ruling denying Rivas-Rivera’s application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). Daniela sought the same relief as a derivative applicant. Rivas-Rivera argues that the IJ erred by denying her application for asylum and withholding of removal. To the extent that she may be challenging the denial of relief under the CAT, that challenge is waived. *See Chambers v. Mukasey,*520 F.3d 445, 448 n.1 (5th Cir. 2008).

Because the BIA agreed with the IJ’s denial of relief, we will review both decisions. *See Wang v. Holder,*569 F.3d 531, 536 (5th Cir. 2009). We review factual findings under the substantial evidence standard and legal questions de novo. *Orellana-Monson v. Holder,*685 F.3d 511, 517-18 (5th Cir. 2012).

An alien seeking asylum must demonstrate past persecution or a wellfounded fear of persecution because of one of five protected grounds, which includes membership in a particular social group. 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1)(A), (B)(i). The'determination that Rivas-Rivera failed to establish her membership in a particular social group, as well as the requisite nexus between any past or future persecution and her proposed particular social group, is supported by substantial evidence. *See Wang,*569 F.3d at 536. Because Rivas-Rivera did not establish a well-founded fear of persecution upon.her return to El Salvador for purposes of asylum, she necessarily did not meet the higher standard of showing a clear probability of persecution upon her return to El Salvador that is required to qualify for withholding of removal. *See Eduard v. Ashcroft,*379 F.3d 182, 186 n.2 (5th Cir. 2004).

The petition for review is DENIED.

*

**Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under *230the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Rupprecht Law P. A. 

324 Datura Street, Suite 200 | West Palm Beach, FL 33401 

P: (561) 222-6979 | E: jon@jrupprechtlaw.com | W: www.jrupprechtlaw.com 

April 18, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE, 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Amendment to Wild Rabbit Productions, LLC Petition for Exemption

Dear Sir or Madam:

This is a request for an amendment to the petition for exemption, Regulatory Docket No. FAA2015-0168-0001, for Wild Rabbit Productions, LLC.

Please be advised that Wild Rabbit Productions, LLC changed its primary address to 528 N. San 

Marino Ave., San Gabriel, CA 91775. Please make sure to include this address in any exemption and 

direct any mail correspondence to this address and also the undersigned counsel. 

Sincerely,

__________________________________________________

Jonathan B. Rupprecht, Esq.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-40258 Conference Calendar

__________________ JOHN WESLEY WRIGHT, Petitioner-Appellant,
versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:95-CV-691
- - - - - - - - - - August 20, 1996 Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * John Wesley Wright, state prisoner #573951, appeals from the dismissal of his habeas corpus petition for abuse of the writ pursuant to Rule 9(b) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. He argues that he had no knowledge of the present issues at the time he filed his first habeas corpus petition because he had notNo. 96-40258 -2- yet obtained and reviewed the statement of facts from his trial. We have reviewed the record and the brief and find no abuse of discretion. We AFFIRM the district court's dismissal of the petition for essentially the same reasons set forth by the district court. See Wright v. Johnson , No. 6:95-CV-691 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 12, 1995). AFFIRMED.
# Official Journal L 82/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 82 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 659 March 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 82

English edition

Legislation

Volume 659 March 2022

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EU) 2022/398 of 9 March 2022 amending Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/399 of 9 March 2022 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine | 9 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EU) 2022/398 of 9 March 2022 amending Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine

1

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/399 of 9 March 2022 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine

9

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2989

BONITA DOROTHY SACILOTTO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BALTIMORE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Precinct

II; SERGEANT MENTZER; JAMES JOHNSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.

(CA-94-2416-JFM)

Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: January 31, 1996

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bonita Dorothy Sacilotto, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Allan Fry,

Assistant Solicitor, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal

period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an

extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day

period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to

relief under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established

by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v.

Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting

United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district

court entered its order on June 27, 1995; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on November 6, 1995. Appellant's failure to note a

timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives

this court of jurisdiction to consider this case. Accordingly, we

grant Appellees' motion and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Louis Brenner, M.D., certify that:

|   | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Allena Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: April 29, 2020 |   | By:    | /s/ Louis Brenner                                |
|----------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |   |   | Louis Brenner, M.D.                                   |
|                 |   |   | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
October 26, 2011 

MEMORANDUM 

From: William H. Maxwell 

EPA/SPPD/ESG (D243-01) 

To: Docket Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234 

Subject: Meeting with Environmental Integrity Project (EIP) 

Attendees: 

Ellen Kurlansky, EPA/OAR/OAA/OPAR 

Bill Meroney, EPA/OAR/OAP/CAMD 

Joel Beauvais, EPA/OGC/IO 

Kellie Ortega, EPA/OECA/OCE/AED 

Eric Schaeffer, Environmental Integrity Project 

Leah Kelly, Environmental Integrity Project 

Stephen Brick, consultant to Environmental Integrity Project 

Discussion: 

A general discussion was held of the comments submitted by Environmental Integrity Project on 

the proposed Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS), specifically concerning plants that 

may retire but that are needed for reliability not be able to operate uncontrolled for longer or 

more than necessary to meet reliability needs.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6710** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. MICHAEL D. PAHUTSKI , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte
. Martin K. Reidinger , District Judge. ( 3:07

- cr - 00211

- MR

- 1; 3:12

- cv - 00308

- MR )

Submitted : September 25, 2014 Decided: September 30, 2014

Before WILKINSON and AGEE , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Michael D. Pahutski, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina ; Melissa Louise Rikard, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, No rth Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael D. Pahutski seeks to appeal the district court’s April 21, 2014 order denying seven motions Pahutski filed while his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion was pending. For the reasons that follow, we dismiss this appeal. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b ); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

– 46 (1949). In the underlying order, the district court rejected Pahutski’s motions to withdraw his guilty plea, for sanctions, to strike the Government’s response to hi s § 2255 motion, and for an expedited ruling o n his § 2255 motion . As to these rulings, the appealed

- from order is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal in part for lack of jurisdiction. The district court al so rejected Pahutski’s three motions for release or bail pending adjudication of his § 2255 motion. Although a district court’s denial of such a request is an appealable collateral order, see , e.g. , Pagan v. United
States , 353 F.3d 1343, 1345

- 46 & n.4 (11 th Cir. 2003) (adopting rule and collecting cases), in light of the district court’s May 28, 2014 order denying the § 2255 motion, Pahutski’s appeal of this aspect of the court’s order is now moot. See Incumaa v.3 Ozmint , 507 F.3d 281, 285

- 86 (4th Cir. 2007) (setting forth the principles of appellate mootness). We therefore dismiss the remainder of this appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED