alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           7,803
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          14,799
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         144,105
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           141,989
<LOANS>                                        440,501
<ALLOWANCE>                                        785
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 625,783
<DEPOSITS>                                     497,801
<SHORT-TERM>                                    15,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,263
<LONG-TERM>                                     26,982
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,956
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,842
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 625,783
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,810
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,245
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   269
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                11,324
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,982
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,647
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,677
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       20
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,730
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,320
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,518
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,518
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .37
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.55
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,515
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,431
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   771
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        9
<RECOVERIES>                                         3
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  785
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               388
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            397
        

</TABLE>
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014, byand among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, CWCapital AssetManagement LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCertificate Administrator, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee,and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor with respect toCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C23 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. 

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that: 

 

1.            A review of theactivities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and 

 

2.            To the bestof my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all ofits obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2017. 

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober 

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Lihui Song, the Chief Executive Officer of Golden Elephant
Glass Technology, Inc. (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1.

The Companys Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the "Report"), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

2.

Information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operation of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has
executed this statement this 15th day of May 2009

/s/ Lihui SongLihui SongChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to Golden Elephant Glass Technology, Inc. and will
be retained by Golden Elephant Glass Technology, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is
not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.



---
Exhibit
31.1




CERTIFICATION




I, Tony Tong, certify
that:




1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PacificNet Inc.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:




(a).
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;




(b).
evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c).
disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal
control over financial reporting; and




5. The
small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):




(a). all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and




(b). any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting.




Dated:  July
      3, 2008
            By: /s/ Tony
      TongName:
      Tony TongTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
  Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-30967

Summary Calendar

TERRON J. WILLIAMS,

Petitioner - Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:18-CV-747

Before BARKSDALE, ELROD, and HO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Terron Jerese Williams, federal prisoner # 99202-179 and proceeding pro 

se, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess, with intent to distribute, five

kilograms or more of cocaine, and 50 grams or more of cocaine base, in the 

Southern District of Texas. As a career offender, Williams’ base offense level 

was enhanced based on his prior controlled-substance convictions under Texas 

law. See U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. 

 

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. 

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 1, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-30967 Document: 00514857645 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/01/2019
No. 18-30967

2

Williams sought relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in the Western 

District of Louisiana, where he is now incarcerated, asserting his Texas 

convictions could not serve as predicates for enhancement purposes—in effect,

claiming to be innocent of the sentence imposed for his federal offense. 

Concluding Williams could not proceed under § 2241 because he failed to 

establish the remedy provided by 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is inadequate or ineffective 

to test the legality of his detention, the district court dismissed for lack of 

jurisdiction. 

The dismissal of a § 2241 motion is reviewed de novo. Pack v. Yusuff, 

218 F.3d 448, 451 (5th Cir. 2000) (citation omitted). For the following reasons, 

the district court properly dismissed Williams’ § 2241 motion for lack of 

jurisdiction. 

Williams had the burden to show no adequate or effective relief was 

attainable under § 2255, making relief under § 2241 proper (the savings 

clause). Jeffers v. Chandler, 253 F.3d 827, 830 (5th Cir. 2001). But, “a section 

2241 petition that seeks to challenge the validity of a federal sentence must 

either be dismissed or construed as a section 2255 motion”. Pack, 218 F.3d at

452 (citation omitted). Because being innocent of a career-offender sentencing 

enhancement cannot satisfy the requirements of § 2255(e)’s savings clause, 

which might otherwise allow for § 2241 relief, Williams does not qualify for 

such relief. See Kinder v. Purdy, 222 F.3d 209, 213–14 (5th Cir. 2000). 

Further, because the § 2241 motion was not filed in the sentencing court,

but rather where Williams is incarcerated, “the district court did not have 

jurisdiction to treat” his motion as a § 2255 motion. Solsona v. Warden, F.C.I., 

821 F.2d 1129, 1132 (5th Cir. 1987) (citation omitted); see also Reyes-Requena 

v. United States, 243 F.3d 893, 895 n.3 (5th Cir. 2001).

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 18-30967 Document: 00514857645 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/01/2019
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 48

Recognizing the 25th anniversary of the establishment of the first nutrition

program for the elderly under the Older Americans Act of 1965.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 13, 1997

Mr. GOODLING (for himself, Mr. RIGGS, Mr. MARTINEZ, and Mr. KILDEE)

submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and the Workforce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the 25th anniversary of the establishment of

the first nutrition program for the elderly under the

Older Americans Act of 1965.

Whereas older individuals who receive proper nutrition tend

to live longer, healthier lives;

Whereas older individuals who receive meals through the nutrition programs carried out under the Older Americans

Act of 1965 have better nutrition than older individuals

who do not participate in these programs;

Whereas through these programs 123,000,000 meals were

served to approximately 2,500,000 older individuals in

congregate settings, and 119,000,000 meals were served

to approximately 989,000 homebound older persons, in

1995;
2

•HCON 48 IH

Whereas older individuals who participate in congregate nutrition programs carried out under this Act benefit not

only from meals, but also from social interaction with

their peers which has a positive influence on their mental

health;

Whereas every dollar provided for nutrition services under the

Older Americans Act of 1965 is supplemented by $1.70

from State, local, tribal, and other Federal funds;

Whereas home-delivered meals provided under the Act are an

important part of every community’s home and community based long-term care program to assist older individuals to remain independent in their own homes;

Whereas these home-delivered meals represent a lifeline to

many vulnerable older individuals who are not able to

shop and prepare meals for themselves;

Whereas the nutrition programs carried out under the Act

successfully target those older individuals in greatest

need and most vulnerable in the community; and

Whereas these nutrition programs have assisted millions of

older individuals beginning with the enactment of Public

Law 92–258 which established the first Federal nutrition

program for older individuals, and continuing throughout

the 25-year history of these programs: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) celebrates the 25th anniversary of the first

4 amendment to the Older Americans Act of 1965 to

5 establish a nutrition program for older individuals,

6 and
3

•HCON 48 IH

1 (2) recognizes that nutrition programs carried

2 out under the Older Americans Act of 1965 continu3 ously have made an invaluable contribution to the

4 well-being of older individuals.

Æ
The Hon. R. Allan Edgar, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of *

Tennessee, sitting by designation.

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 07a0230n.06

Filed: March 28, 2007

No. 06-3737

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

MELISSA MITCHELL, JENNIFER )

FRIETSCH, AND SCOTT OROS, )

)

Plaintiffs-Appellants, ) 

) ON APPEAL from the 

v. ) United States District

) Court for the Southern District

) of Ohio

ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO. AND )

ABERCROMBIE & FITCH STORES, INC., )

)

Defendants-Appellees. )

Before: COOK and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges, and EDGAR, Senior District Judge.*

PER CURIAM. The district court addressed all issues in this case in a comprehensive, well

reasoned opinion entered on March 31, 2006, granting Abercrombie & Fitch Co.’s motion for

summary judgment and dismissing all claims under federal and Ohio law. This Court AFFIRMS

the district court’s judgment on the basis of that opinion. This Court notes, however, that without

saying so explicitly, the district court in effect declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over

the plaintiff’s claims under Pennsylvania law. As acknowledged by counsel for Abercrombie &

Fitch Co. at oral argument, the plaintiffs’ claims under Pennsylvania law are deemed to have been

dismissed without prejudice by the district court.
EXHIBIT 32.1






February 26, 2008


Securities and Exchange
Commission


450 Fifth Street,
N.W.


Washington,DC20549






CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18
OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




I, Peter R. Frank, Chief Executive
Officerand Principal
Accounting and Financial Officerof GSC Acquisition Company (the
‘‘Company’’), certify that, to the best of my knowledge:






(1)
            the annual report of the Company
      on Form 10-K for the annual period ending December 31, 2008 (the
      ‘‘Report’’) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and




(2)
            the information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
      periods presented in the
Report.




/s/ Peter
      R. FrankPeter
      R. FrankChief
      Executive Officer and Principal Accounting and Financial
      Officer






A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to GSC Acquisition Company
and will be retained by GSC Acquisition Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
June 25, 2015

MEMORANDUM

Subject: Summary of Stakeholder Meeting

From: Martha Keating

To: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0699

On June 18, 2015, representatives of EPA attended a meeting with representatives of the 

American Petroleum Institute. The meeting was held by videoconference. Attendees discussed 

the ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards rulemaking. API provided a 1-pager for the 

meeting and is attached.

The following is a list of attendees and their affiliation:

Name Affiliation

Dana Wood BP

Amy Trojecki BP

Mara Zimmerman API

Puneet Verma Chevron

Sherry Hesselbein MPC

Howard Feldman API

Khary Cauthen API

Erin Tullos XOM

Ammie Bachman XOM

Marnie Funk Shell

Al Collins Oxy

Caroline E PGG

Tyler Kruzich CVX

Robert Nolan Exxon Mobile

Guy Beeman Marathon Petroleum

Janet McCabe EPA Office of Air and Radiation

Pamela Franklin EPA/Office of Atmospheric Programs

Steve Page EPA/Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

(OAQPS)

Mike Koerber EPA/OAQPS

Erika Sasser EPA/OAQPS

Karen Wesson EPA/OAQPS

Darryl Weatherhead EPA/OAQPS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jaime AVILA, Jr., Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-10215 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 20, 2017

James Wesley Hendrix,-Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Jaime Avila, Jr., Pro Se

Before JONES, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges-.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jaime Avila, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Avila has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from (a)
Financial Statements as of June 30, 1997 and for the six month period then ended
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such (b) Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ended June 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          33,944
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,017,223
<ALLOWANCES>                                   423,939
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               945,667
<PP&E>                                       1,566,268
<DEPRECIATION>                                 280,803
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,011,545
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,309,876
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,500,000
<COMMON>                                        10,935
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,041,874)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,101,742
<SALES>                                      2,642,783
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,642,783
<CGS>                                        2,811,115
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,811,115
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               951,572
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             131,033
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,237,686)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,237,686)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,237,686)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)
        

</TABLE>