alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 59 (Monday, March 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 17311]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06374]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Initial Review 
Group; Career Development For Early Career Investigators Study 
Section.
    Date: June 2-3, 2022.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Carmen Moten, Ph.D., MPH, Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institutes of Health, NCI Center to Reduce Cancer 
Health Disparities, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Suite 602, Bethesda, 
MD 20892, 301 496-8589, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#30737d7f64757e707d71797c1e7e79781e777f66"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d1929c9e85949f919c90989dff9f9899ff969e87">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 22, 2022.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-06374 Filed 3-25-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### IN RE: Mohammed Nasser JILANI, Petitioner. In re: Mohammed Nasser Jilani, Petitioner.

No. 17-1846, No. 17-2057

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 16, 2017

Decided: November 20, 2017

Mohammed Nasser Jilani, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*178PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated cases, Mohammed N. Jilani petitions for writs of habeas corpus, seeking release from jail and dismissal of two indictments issued in Wake County, North Carolina, This court’ ordinarily declines to entertain original habeas corpus petitions, 18 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012), and these cases present no reason to depart from this practice. Further, we find that the interests of justice would not be served by transferring these cases to the appropriate district court. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the petitions. The motions for appointment of counsel, for bail, for evi-dentiary hearing, and for bail are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITIONS DISMISSED*
# Official Journal L 167/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.167.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 167 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5527 June 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.167.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 167

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5527 June 2012

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products (1) | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23 - 10164 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff
— Appellee **,** versus **Pedro Hernandez Zarate,** Defendant
— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:21 - CR - 112 - 3

**______________ ________________**  Before **Smith, Higginson,** and **Engelhardt,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The attorney appointed to represent Pedro Hernandez Zarate has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Zarate has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the releva nt portions of the record reflected therein, as well as

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 5, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-10164 Document: 00516883670 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/05/2023No. 23 - 10164

2 Zarate ’s response . We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSE D**  . See **5th Cir. R**  **.** 42.2. Case: 23-10164 Document: 00516883670 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/05/2023
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

          - [Docket No. 22-05]

      ( print page 16737)    
Notice is given that a complaint has been filed with the Federal Maritime Commission (Commission) by Foreign Tires Sales, Inc., hereinafter “Complainant”, against Evergreen Shipping Agency (America) Corp.; as agent for Evergreen Line, Evergreen Group d/b/a Evergreen Line (Evergreen), “Respondents”. Complainant alleges that Respondent Evergreen Shipping Agency (America) Corp. is a corporation existing under the laws of the State of New Jersey and agent for Evergreen, a vessel-operating common carrier.

                    Complainant alleges that Respondents violated 46 U.S.C. 41102(c), 41104(a)(2), 41104(a)(5), 41104(a)(9), and 41104(a)(10) with regard to refusal to provide space on their vessels. The full text of the complaint can be found in the Commission's Electronic Reading Room at                     *https://www2.fmc.gov/​readingroom/​proceeding/​22-05/​.*

This proceeding has been assigned to Office of Administrative Law Judges. The initial decision of the presiding office in this proceeding shall be issued by March 20, 2023, and the final decision of the Commission shall be issued by October 4, 2023.

Served: March 18, 2022.

William Cody,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-06210 Filed 3-23-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-02-P
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **4 -**  **6 057** 

T ERRENCE WAYNE LYTLE , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. LAWRENCE PARSONS , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. James C. Dever III , Chief District Judge. ( 5 :1 2

- hc

- 0 2263

- D )

Submitted : April 17, 2014 Decided: April 22, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion
. Terrence Wayne Lytle , Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Terrence Wayne Ly tle seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certific ate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reaso nable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitut ional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lytle has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Lytle’s motion for a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperi s, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
       
<S>                                         <C>                  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               6-MOS                
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           Dec-31-1998          
<PERIOD-START>                              Jan-1-1998           
<PERIOD-END>                                Jun-30-1998          
<CASH>                                      2,182,284            
<SECURITIES>                                0                    
<RECEIVABLES>                               242,371              
<ALLOWANCES>                                35,000               
<INVENTORY>                                 60,757               
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            2,566,997            
<PP&E>                                      1,046,070            
<DEPRECIATION>                              310,963              
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              3,600,887            
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       745,199              
<BONDS>                                     0                    
<COMMON>                                    1,444                
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0                    
<PREFERRED>                                 250                  
<OTHER-SE>                                  2,813,331            
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                3,600,887            
<SALES>                                     1,717,983            
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            2,028,036            
<CGS>                                       845,647              
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               4,075,516            
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            3,221,940            
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0                    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          7,929                
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,047,480)          
<INCOME-TAX>                                0                    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         0                    
<DISCONTINUED>                              0                    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0                    
<CHANGES>                                   0                    
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,047,480)          
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               (1.51)               
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (1.51)               
        


<PAGE>

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT ITEM 31.2**

 

SECTION302 CERTIFICATION

 

I,Bruce N. Warner certify that:

 

1.               I have read this quarterly report on Form10-QSB of Northern California Bancorp, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this quarterly reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this annual report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              designed such disclosure controls andprocedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;

 

b)             evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period (the “EvaluationDate”); and

 

c)              presented in this annual report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on ourevaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee or registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

a)              all significant deficiencies in the design oroperation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and haveidentified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internalcontrols; and

 

b)             any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls;and

 

6.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significantchanges in internal controls or in other factors that could significantlyaffect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.

 

 
| Date: May  10, 2005 | /s/ Bruce  N. Warner      |   |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------|--------|
|                     | Bruce N.  Warner               |
|                     | Chief  Financial Officer & |
|                     | Principal  Accounting Officer  |

 

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ashanti Rhan HENRY, a/k/a A-1, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-7651

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 22, 2018

Decided: February 27, 2018

Ashanti Rhan Henry, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst, Zachary T. Lee, Assistant United States Attorneys, Mary Kathleen Carnell, Abingdon, Virginia, Charlene Rene Day, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ashanti Rhan Henry seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion as successive. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Henry has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Henry’s motion for transcripts at government expense, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA-2012-1317

Directorate Identifier: 2011NM194AD

737-53-1244, R3 --- 12/4/08

737-53-1244, R2 --- 3/15/07

737-53-1244, R1 --- 5/29/03

737-53-1244 --- 4/17/03

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 
  





 
 CURO CURO Group Holdings Corp. INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS CUSIP 000000 00 0
THIS CERTIFIES THAT is the owner of FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE COMMON SHARES, $0.001 PAR VALUE, OF CURO Group Holdings Corp. transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this
certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid until countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed by facsimile signatures of its
duly authorized officers. Dated: CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD, PRESIDENT OR VICE PRESIDENT SECRETARY OR TREASURER COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY (Brooklyn, New York) TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR BY AUTHORIZED
SIGNATURE 







 



 
 THE BOARD OF THIS CORPORATION HAS THE AUTHORITY TO CREATE AND DETERMINE THE RELATIVE RIGHTS AND PREFERENCES OF CLASSES OR SERIES OF
SHARES OF CAPITAL STOCK OTHER THAN COMMON STOCK. THIS CORPORATION WILL FURNISH TO ANY SHAREHOLDER UPON WRITTEN REQUEST SENT TO ITS PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES, AND WITHOUT CHARGE, A FULL STATEMENT OF THE BOARD’S AUTHORITY TO CREATE AND
DETERMINE THE RELATIVE RIGHTS AND PREFERENCES OF CLASSES OR SERIES OF SHARES OF CAPITAL STOCK AS WELL AS THE DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES, LIMITATIONS AND RELATIVE RIGHTS OF THE SHARES OF EACH CLASS OR SERIES THEN OUTSTANDING OR AUTHORIZED TO BE
ISSUED. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM – as tenants in common UTMA
– Custodian (Cust) (Minor) TEN ENT – as tenants by entireties under Uniform Transfers to Minors JT TEN – as joint tenants with right of survivorship Act and not as tenants in common (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used
though not in the above list. For value received hereby sell, assign, and transfer unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) Shares
of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated
NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. SIGNATURE GUARANTEED ALL GUARANTEES MUST BE MADE BY A
FINANCIAL INSTITUTION (SUCH AS A BANK OR BROKER) WHICH IS A PARTICIPANT IN THE SECURITIES TRANSFER AGENTS MEDALLION PROGRAM (“STAMP”), THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC. MEDALLION SIGNATURE PROGRAM (“MSP”), OR THE STOCK EXCHANGES
MEDALLION PROGRAM (“SEMP”) AND MUST NOT BE DATED. GUARANTEES BY A NOTARY PUBLIC ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.