alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TALK VISUAL
CORPORATION'S BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS, STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE PERIOD THEN ENDED, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                   485766
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                            149887
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                              147168
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        1703091
<PP&E>                                 12555336
<DEPRECIATION>                           588341
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         16765104
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   1470567
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                 187
<COMMON>                                  64202
<OTHER-SE>                              9833122
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           16765104
<SALES>                                  884280
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        1847472
<CGS>                                   1669780
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        3259988
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       495563
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (3577859)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (3577859)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          122347
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                           (3455512)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (0.08)



</TABLE>
No. 11-10296.

#### In re Anderson.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

J.P.Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp. 

383 Madison Avenue 

31st Floor 

New York, New York 10179 

 

Re:          Annual Statement of Compliance for JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2014-C23,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-C23 

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1,2014 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer ofWells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"),hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016(the "Reporting Period"): 

 

(a)           A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of itsperformance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision;and 

 

(b)           Tothe best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period. 

 

 

February 27, 2017 

 

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH 

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                  ------------
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Martin Wade, III, certify that:

         1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
International Microcomputer Software, Inc;

         2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered by this
quarterly report;

         3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;

         4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a.   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
periods in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b.   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c.   Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date.

         5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a.   All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b.   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

         6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant efficiencies and material weaknesses.


Dated: November 14, 2002

By: /s/ Martin Wade, III
Martin Wade, III
Director & Chief Executive Officer

                                       25


<PAGE>
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES

AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES 

### MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Addendum to the Risk Assessment and Science Support Branch: Final Draft

of Human Health Science Chapter For 1,4-Bis(bromoacetoxy)-2-butene RED, PC Code 0360, Case 818798, Barcode D271450.
FROM: Robert Quick, Chemist

Risk Assessment and Science Support Branch Antimicrobials Division(7510C)
THRU: Norm Cook, Chief

Risk Assessment and Science Support Branch Antimicrobials Division(7510C)
TO: Connie Welch, Chief

Regulatory Management Branch II Antimicrobials Division(7510C) Attached please find the following documents for the final draft human health science chapter for 1,4 Bis(bromoacetoxy)-2-butene: 1. Amended draft bibliography chapter 2. Revised draft science chapter The purpose of this addendum is to respond to the FDA review of the first EPA draft of this science chapter. The EPA revisions address the concerns that FDA raised in their review. These are: C FDA Comment: The FDA commented concerning the possible use of this chemical as a coating to manufactured paper--in addition to the slimicide use of the chemical introduced into the wet end of the paper-making process. EPA response: EPA did not consider the labeled use for paper to include a coating use because of the manner in which the use pattern is stated on the label. However, the EPA suggests that the label be revised to clarify the use pattern.Page 2 of 2 C FDA Comment: The FDA uses an FDA model to calculate expected residues in the BBAB-treated paper and in the food contacting the treated paper. This results in a finding of very low residues in food that contacts treated paper. Therefore, FDA questions EPA’s use of a more conservative model. EPA Response: The EPA did not use the FDA model to calculate residues in the BBAB-treated paper. This is because BBAB has a very low solubility in water and because of an available migration study for BBAB in treated paper which showed migration of BBAB from treated paper into food-simulating solvents. This migration study does not follow current FDA guidance for conducting a migration study. Additionally, that migration study was repeated in part to show no detectable residues in food-simulating solvents. Because the previous migration study contained contradictory results and because BBAB has limited water solubility, EPA performed a very conservative calculation for BBAB residues in food. Thus, the EPA calculations produce a BBAB dietary intake that is several orders of magnitude higher than the FDA model. EPA believes these calculations are more appropriate for BBAB than FDA’s estimates.
EXHIBIT 32.2

PROTALIX BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the quarterly report of Protalix BioTherapeutics, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Yossi Maimon, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

| |     |                                                                                                                                      
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, ‘‘filed’’ with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: November 14, 2007

/s/ Yossi Maimon
Yossi Maimon
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Ruben C. Gomez v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 18

- 00864

- CR

Trial court case number: 1564007

Trial court: 351st District Court of Harris County

In response to a joint motion from the parties, the Court abated the appeal and remanded to the trial court for preparation of findings of fact and conclusions of law concerning the denial of appellant’s motion to suppress. The Court ordered these findings and conclusions to be filed in this Court in a supplemental clerk’s record by June 30, 2019. A supplemental clerk’s record was filed on June 26, 2019, which contained three documents purporting to be findings and conclusions

but none of these docu ments was signed by the trial court. On July 25, 2019, appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file his brief, stating that the trial court had signed new findings and conclusions. Because the trial court has not yet complied with this Court’s or der, the appeal

remains abated.

We order the trial court to file a supplemental clerk’s record within 10 days of the date of

this order containing the most recent findings and conclusions, signed by the trial court, concerning the denial of appellant’s mot ion to suppress. Appellant’s motion for extension of time is granted until 30 days after the supplemental clerk’s record containing the signed findings and

conclusions is filed in this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

____

/s/ Richard Hightower

___  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __ August 8, 20 19

__
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Paul Lynn SCHLIEVE, Defendant-Appellant

No. 14-40577

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 15, 2018

Alan Reeve Jackson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Texas, Tyler, TX, Maureen Clancy Smith, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Texas, Sherman, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

William Jones, Jones Law Firm, Madison, WI, for Defendant-Appellant

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the certain reasons set forth in the magistrate judge’s report of August 24, 2010.

The conviction of Schlieve was affirmed by this court in 2005, and then he filed a motion under § 2255 to vacate his sen*435tence. The only point still pursued claims that defense counsel was misled by the prosecutor about evidence on a video that would have been *Brady*material and could have been suppressed had not counsel been misled. The record fully obliterates that claim, because the defense counsel had possession of the video, as did the jury. No evidence stands to support it.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
.. ' ·' ~ 

BEFORE THE 

- - .. ~ 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION · "' 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 

Motion of 

AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC. DOT-OST-1995-569 

for confidential treatment under Rule 

12 (Form 41, Schedules B-7) 

MOTION OF AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC. 

FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 12 

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to: 

FRANCIS C. HEIL 

Managing Director -

Legal and Government Affairs 

American Airlines, Inc. 

1101 17th Street, N.W. 

Suite 600 

Washington, D.C. 20036 

(202) 496-5642 

francis.heil@aa.com 

May 7, 2014 
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 

Motion of 

AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC. 

for confidential treatment under Rule 

12 (Form 41, Schedules B-7) 

DOT-OST-1995-569 

MOTION OF AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC. 

FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 12 

American Eagle Airlines, Inc. 1 , under 14 CFR 302.12, 

hereby moves that its Form 41, Schedule B-7 for 1Q2014, be 

accorded confidential treatment and withheld from public 

disclosure. The information for which confidential treatment 

is requested pertains to American Eagle's airframes and aircraft engine acquisitions and retirements. 

In accordance with the Department's Final Rule on Submitting Airline Data via the Internet, 75 Fed. Reg. 41580, 

41582, we are uploading our confidential report electronically 

to the following website: http://esubmit.rita.dot.gov 

1 On April 15, 2014, American Eagle Airlines, Inc., changed its 

name to Envoy Air Inc. and both DOT and FAA reissued its 

carrier certificates in the name of Envoy Air Inc. on that 

date. As this report is for the 1Q 2014, the submission is made 

under the name of American Eagle Airlines. Subsequent Form 41 

submissions will be made under Envoy Air Inc. 
-2-

On June 5, 1995, James W. Mitchell, Director, Office of 

Airline Statistics, the Department granted confidential treatment for a 10-year period to similar data filed by American 

Airlines. For the reasons stated in Mr. Mitchell's letter, the 

Department should grant the same relief here. 

WHEREFORE, American Eagle moves that the schedule 

referenced above be withheld from public disclosure under Rule 

12 for a period of 10 years. 

May 7, 2014 

Respectfully submitted, 

FRANCIS C. HEIL 

Managing DirectorLegal and Government Affairs 

American Airlines, Inc. 

On behalf of American Eagle 

Airlines, Inc.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donna Jean JENKINS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-7507

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 18, 2018

Decided: January 23, 2018

Donna Jean Jenkins, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Char-lottesville, Virginia; Elizabeth G. Wright, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donna Jean Jenkins seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion to vacate. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than 60 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” *Bowles v. Russell,*551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on August 29, 2017. The notice of appeal was filed on November 6, 2017.* Because Jenkins failed to file a *219timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*

*

 For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the district court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); *Houston v. Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 276, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).
Exhibit 35.6



LOGO

Annual Statement as to Compliance

For the Period of January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015

WFRBS 2014-C22

In accordance with
Item 1123 of Regulation AB and with the requirements detailed in §11.12 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the Agreement) for the above-mentioned CMBS pool, (the CMBS Pool), CWCapital Asset Management LLC
(CWCAM), in its capacity as Special Servicer, is providing this Officers Certificate with respect to the following:



| | (A) | a review of CWCAMs activities during the preceding calendar year or portion thereof (the Reporting Period) and of CWCAMs performance under the Agreement has been made under such officers
supervision and;
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (B) | to the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, CWCAM has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.



|                              
|------------------------------
|Sincerely,                    
|CWCapital Asset Management LLC
|                              
|/s/ David B. Iannorone        
|                              
|David B. Iannarone            
|President                     

7501 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 500 West, Bethesda, MD 20814

www.cwcapital.com
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 324 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 324

 To provide funding for the Office of Senate Fair Employment Practices 
           to carry out certain transition responsibilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 3, 1996

 Mr. Lott submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To provide funding for the Office of Senate Fair Employment Practices 
           to carry out certain transition responsibilities.

    Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate shall transfer an amount 
not to exceed $100,000, from the resolution and reorganization reserve 
of the miscellaneous items appropriations account, within the 
contingent fund of the Senate, for use by the Director of the Office of 
Senate Fair Employment Practices for salaries and expenses of such 
Office through January 30, 1997, related to carrying out the 
responsibilities of such Office in accordance with section 506 of the 
Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1435). Effective 
date is October 1, 1996.
                                 <all>
```