alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 83

To express the sense of the Senate regarding tax cuts during the 104th

Congress.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 2 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1995

Mr. FEINGOLD (for himself and Mr. BUMPERS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred jointly pursuant to the order of August 4,

1977, to the Committees on the Budget and Governmental Affairs, with

instructions that if one committee reports, the other committee have thirty days to report or be discharged

RESOLUTION

To express the sense of the Senate regarding tax cuts during

the 104th Congress.

Whereas the Federal budget according to the most recent estimates of the Congressional Budget Office continues to

be in deficit in excess of $190 billion;

Whereas continuing annual Federal budget deficits add to the

Federal debt which soon is projected to exceed $5 trillion;

Whereas continuing Federal budget deficits and growing Federal debt reduce savings and capital formation;

Whereas continuing Federal budget deficits contribute to a

higher level of interest rates than would otherwise occur,

raising capital costs and curtailing total investment;
2

SRES 83 RIS

Whereas continuing Federal budget deficits also contribute to

significant trade deficits and dependence on foreign capital;

Whereas the Federal debt that results from persistent Federal deficits transfers a potentially crushing burden to future generations, making their living standards lower

than they otherwise would have been;

Whereas efforts to reduce the Federal deficit should be

among the highest economic priorities of the 104th Congress; and

Whereas enacting across-the-board or so-called middle class

tax cut measures could impede efforts during the 104th

Congress to significantly reduce the Federal deficit: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that re2 ducing the Federal deficit should be one of the Nation’s

3 highest priorities, that enacting an across-the-board or so4 called middle class tax cut during the 104th Congress

5 would hinder efforts to significantly reduce the Federal

6 deficit.

Æ
NO. 07-07-0398-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL B

	JANUARY 11, 2008

	______________________________

	ADRIAN MAURICE THOMAS, 

									Appellant

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

									Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 47TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

	NO. 52,883-A; HON. HAL MINER, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

	Memorandum Opinion

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

	Adrian Maurice Thomas appeals his conviction for possessing a controlled substance, namely cocaine.  His appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw, together with an Anders1 brief wherein he certified that after diligently searching the record, he concluded that the appeal is without merit.  Counsel has also attached a copy of a letter sent to appellant informing him of counsel’s belief and of appellant’s right to file his own brief or response pro se.  By letter dated December 4, 2007, this court  notified appellant of the same right and set January 3, 2008, as the deadline to respond.  To date, appellant has filed neither a response, brief, nor request for an extension of time.  

	In compliance with the principles of Anders, appellate counsel discussed three potential areas for appeal.  They involved 1) the sufficiency of the evidence, 2) the effectiveness of trial counsel, and 3) the measure of punishment assessed.  Counsel then explained why each argument lacked merit. 

	We also conducted our own review of the record to assess the accuracy of counsel’s conclusions and to uncover any error pursuant to Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).  That review failed to reveal any reversible error.  

	Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is granted, and the judgment is affirmed.

							Brian Quinn 

						          Chief Justice

Do not publish.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maria HERNANDEZ-SOTELO, also known as Maria Renaye De Leon, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-2420

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: December 13, 2017

Filed: December 18, 2017

Daniel C. Tvedt, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Iowa, Cedar Rapids, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

*385Maria Hernandez-Sotelo, Pro Se

Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Maria Hernandez-Sotelo (Hernandez) directly appeals the within-Guidelines-range sentence the district court1 imposed after she pled.guilty to misusing a social security number. Counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that the district court committed plain procedural error by failing to explain adequately the reasons for Hernandez’s sentence, and questioning the reasonableness of the sentence.

After careful review, we conclude that no plain procedural error occurred, as the record as a whole demonstrates that the district court considered the relevant factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). *See United States v. Chavarria-Ortiz,*828 F.3d 668, 670-71 (8th Cir. 2016) (discussing standard of review where defendant did not object to sufficiency of explanation at sentencing); *see also United States v. Krzyzaniak,*702 F.3d 1082, 1085 (8th Cir. 2013). We also conclude that the district court did not impose an unreasonable sentence. *See United States v. Feemster,*572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (reviewing sentence under deferential abuse-of-discretion. standard; discussing substantive reasonableness); *see also United States v. Callaway,*762 F.3d 754, 760 (8th Cir. 2014) (presuming sentence within Guidelines range is reasonable). In addition, having independently reviewed the record under *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no non-frivolous issues for appeal.

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. The judgment is affirmed.

1

. The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.
## 2006 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit
3-17-2006 

# I n Re: Alm ahdi
P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 05-5045

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2006

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2006 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du
. 

## Re c omme nde d C it at ion

" I n Re: Alm ahd i " (2006). 2006 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1414. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2006/1414

## HPS-19 (December 2005) NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

____________

No. 05-5045

____________ IN RE: JAMALUDDIN ALMAHDI, Petitioner
On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (Related to D.N.J. No. 05-cv-01613)

____________ Submitted Under Rule 21, Fed. R. App. Pro. December 16, 2005 Before: SCIRICA, Chief Judge , WEIS and GARTH, Circuit Judges
. (Filed: March 17, 2006)

____________ PER CURIAM. Pro se petitioner Jamalud-Din Almahdi, a federal prisoner, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey to reach a decision on his Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment filed on May 9, 2005. We will deny the petition as moot. In April 2005, Almahdi filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The District Court dismissed the complaint because the defendants were immune from

## 2 

## liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 9, 2005, Almahdi filed a Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment. In September 2005, Almahdi filed a motion to compel the District Court to answer his previous motion. The remedy of mandamus is reserved for the most extraordinary of circumstances. DeMasi v. Weiss , 669 F.2d 114, 117 (3d Cir. 1982). In order to ensure that mandamus is sparingly granted, a petitioner seeking a writ of mandamus must demonstrate that no other adequate means are available to obtain the desired relief and that the right to issuance of the writ is “clear and indisputable.” Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daifon, Inc. , 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980). Here, on January 30, 2006, the District Court denied Almahdi’s Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment. The District Court further denied Almahdi’s motion for an order to compel. In light of the District Court’s orders, Almahdi’s petition for a writ of mandamus will be denied as moot.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO

MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

To the 84th District Court of Hansford County, Greeting:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on March 26,

2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

In the Interest of L.G. and S.G., Children

Case Number: 07-14-00365-CV Trial Court Number: 5210

was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated March 26, 2015, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis

, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of

Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof

annexed, at the City of Amarillo on June 11, 2015

.



# Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK
No. 11-1411.

#### Giovanniello *v.*ALM Media, LLC.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of *Mims*v. *Arrow Financial Services, LLC,*565 U. S. 368 (2012).
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage Servicing**D1086-120, 12th Floor550 South Tryon StreetCharlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 **ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**  Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL  ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and SITUS HOLDINGS, LLC as Operating Advisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, COMM 2014-UBS5 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that: 1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.  /s/ Daniel BoberDaniel BoberExecutive Vice PresidentWells Fargo Bank  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (logo) Together we’ll go far
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13(a) OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of IRIDEX Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of the annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  By:
Name:
    
    /s/ BARRY G. CALDWELL

Barry G. CaldwellTitle:
    
    President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
U.S. Department

of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New JerseyA venueSE Washington, D.C. 20590 Re: Amendment

to exemption, additional aircraft Dear Sir orMadam: Midstream Integrity Services, LLC (henceforth referred
toas"MIS") hereby petitions the Secretary ofTransportation

and Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA")
toadd the following aircraft
tothe petition granted toMIS (Exemption No. 11554, FAA Docket No. FAA-2015-0377)

aswell asthe COA granted toMIS (FAA-2015-0377-333E.) Aircraft and Equipment MIS will usethe following unmanned aircraft (UA) for inspection and photography work: •DJIPhantom III • Roboflight RF-70 Aircraft gross weight will notexceed respective operation manual guidance. Operating characteristics and maintenance procedures areoutlined
in the attached operations manuals. The radio frequency spectrumused for operation and control of the UA will comply with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) orother appropriate government oversight agency requirements. All aircraft operated

in accordance with this exemption will be identified by serial number, registered in accordance with 14 CFR part 47, and have identification (N-Number) markings

in accordance with 14 CFR part 45, Subpart C. Markings will be as large as practicable. If the UA loses communications

orloses its GPS signal,

it will returntoa pre-determined location within the planned operating areaand land orbe recovered

in accordance with the operating documents. Altitude awarenesswill be maintained via aradio communications telemetry data link, which downlinks from the aircraft tothe PIC for active monitoring
of the flight path. The altitude information will be generated
by GPS equipment installed onthe aircraft. Prior toeach flight,

azero altitude initiation point will be established and confirmed for accuracy by the UAS PIC. Respectfully submitted, Landon Phillips Program Manager, Unmanned Aerial Systems Midstream Integrity ServicesAttachments: (1) DJIPhantom III Operations Manual (2) Roboflight RF-70 Operations Manual
#### Luis FIGUEROA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Warden Gio RAMIREZ, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-7508

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 30, 2018

Decided: February 2, 2018

Luis Figueroa, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Luis Figueroa, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Figueroa’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Figueroa v. Ramirez,*No. 1:17-cv-01965-RBH, 2017 WL 4349210 (D.S.C. Oct. 2, 2017). We dispense with oral argument *166because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
**EXHIBIT31.2**

 

SECTION302 CERTIFICATION

 

I, Bruce N. Warner certifythat:

 

1.         I have read this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Northern CaliforniaBancorp, Inc.;

 

2.         Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;

 

3.         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.         The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              designed such disclosure controls andprocedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;

 

b)             evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period (the “EvaluationDate”); and

 

c)              presented in this quarterly report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and proceduresbased on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.         The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee or registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

A)          all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrols which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for theregistrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

B)            any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.   The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significantchanges in internal controls or in other factors that could significantlyaffect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.

 

 
| Date:  November 9, 2004 | /s/  Bruce N. Warner           |   |
|-------------------------|--------------------------------|--------|
|                    | Bruce N. Warner                |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer  & |
|                    | Principal Accounting  Officer  |

 

----