alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

      ( print page 16262)    

# TIME AND DATE: 

March 30, 2022, at 9:00 a.m.

# PLACE: 

Washington, DC.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

##  Wednesday, March 30, 2022, at 9:00 a.m.

1. Strategic Issues.

2. Financial and Operational Issues.

3. Executive Session.

4. Administrative Items.

*General Counsel Certification:*                     The General Counsel of the United States Postal Service has certified that the meeting may be closed under the Government in the Sunshine Act.                

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Michael J. Elston, Secretary of the Board of Governors, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW, Washington, DC 20260-1000. Telephone: (202) 268-4800.

Michael J. Elston,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-06144 Filed 3-18-22; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


November 29, 2017


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust 354


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the series of Smart Trust set forth above (the “Trust”). We enclosed a list
of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such
Securities as of close of business on November 28, 2017, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in the Standard Terms
and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing
the evaluations of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-220275) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
with respect to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO                               


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
Exhibit 10.70


 


Power of Attorney


 


I hereby appoints Ambow Education Management
(Hong Kong) Ltd. as the agent of the shareholders to attend the shareholder meetings of Intelligent
Valley Polytron Technologies Inc (“ Intelligent Valley ”), and
to exercise all voting rights to which I am entitled as a shareholder of Intelligent Valley.


 


Please attend the certificate (or attendance
card) sent to the collecting agent. If you change the meeting, this contract is still valid.


 


To:


 


Intelligent Valley Polytron
Technologies Inc


  


	Client (Shareholder): Chiao-Ling Hsu 	 	Trustee: Ambow Education Management (Hong Kong) Ltd.
	 	
	 	

	Signature:	
        /s/
	 	

	 	
	 	

	Number of holding shares: 300,000 	 	Corporate Seal


 




     


     


    

  


Power of Attorney


 


I hereby appoints Ambow Education Management
(Hong Kong) Ltd. as the agent of the shareholders to attend the shareholder meetings of Intelligent
Valley Polytron Technologies Inc (“ Intelligent Valley ”), and
to exercise all voting rights to which I am entitled as a shareholder of Intelligent Valley.


 


Please attend the certificate (or attendance
card) sent to the collecting agent. If you change the meeting, this contract is still valid.


 


To:


 


Intelligent Valley Polytron
Technologies Inc


 


	Client (Shareholder): Shu Hui Cai	 	Trustee: Ambow Education Management (Hong Kong) Ltd.
	 	 	 	 
	Signature:	
        /s/ 
	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	Number of holding shares: 200,000 	 	Corporate Seal
# Official Journal C 410/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 410 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6327 November 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 410

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6327 November 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2020/C 410/01 | Position (EU) No 14/2020 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the quality of water intended for human consumption (recast)Adopted by the Council on 23 October 2020 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2020/C 410/02 | Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 14/2020 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the quality of water intended for human consumption (recast) | 57 |

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COUNCIL

2020/C 410/01

Position (EU) No 14/2020 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the quality of water intended for human consumption (recast)Adopted by the Council on 23 October 2020 (
  1
  )

1

1

2020/C 410/02

Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 14/2020 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the quality of water intended for human consumption (recast)

57

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2015245EN.01002501.xml

| 27.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/25

---

Order of the General Court of 22 May 2015 — Erbslöh Aluminium v Commission

(Case T-298/14) (1)

1

((State aid - Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings - Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU - Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 245/30)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Erbslöh Aluminium GmbH (Velbert, Germany) (represented by: T. Volz, M. Ringel, B. Wißmann, M. Püstow, C. Oehme and T. Wielsch, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and by A. Luke and C. Maurer, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to annul in part Commission decision C (2013) 4424 final of 18 December 2013 to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU regarding measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users (State aid SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN)).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

| 2. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.

| 3. | Erbslöh Aluminium GmbH shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Erbslöh Aluminium GmbH shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures.

| 4. | The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                   ----------

                        CERTIFICTION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Talk Visual Corporation (the Company) Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Harley L. Rollins,
Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)  The report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
              material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  results  of
              operations of the Company.


Date:  August 9, 2003
                        By:  Harley L. Rollins
                        ---------------------------------------------------
                             Harley L. Rollins President,
                             Chief Executive Office and Chief Financial  Officer
                             (principal    executive   officer   and   principal
                             financial and accounting officer) and Director



                                    Page 21
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned, Stephen M. Siedow, the Chief Executive Officer, President
and Chief Financial Officer of Equicap, Inc. (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY, that:

     1.   The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
          September 30, 2005 (the "Report"), fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
          and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement
this 9th day of November, 2005.


                                             By: /s/ Stephen M. Siedow
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Stephen M. Siedow, Chief Executive
                                             Officer, President and Chief
                                             Financial Officer


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Equicap, Inc. and will be retained by Equicap, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or it staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 305 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 305

   Authorizing the use of the Capitol grounds for the American Luge 
                           Association Races.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 23, 1998

   Mr. Davis of Virginia (for himself and Ms. Norton) submitted the 
following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Authorizing the use of the Capitol grounds for the American Luge 
                           Association Races.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF AMERICAN LUGE RACES ON CAPITOL GROUNDS.

    The American Luge Association (in this resolution referred to as 
the ``Association'') shall be permitted to sponsor a public event, luge 
races, on the Capitol grounds on August 8 and 9, 1998, or on such other 
date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President 
pro tempore of the Senate may jointly designate.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

    The event to be carried out under this resolution shall be free of 
admission charge to the public and arranged not to interfere with the 
needs of Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board; except that the 
Association shall assume full responsibility for all expenses and 
liabilities incident to all activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

    For the purposes of this resolution, the Association is authorized 
to erect upon the Capitol grounds, subject to the approval of the 
Architect of the Capitol, such stage, sound amplification devices, and 
other related structures and equipment as may be required for the event 
to be carried out under this resolution.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

    The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board are 
authorized to make any such additional arrangements that may be 
required to carry out the event under this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. William Arthur COOPER, Jr. Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-2965

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: December 27, 2017

Filed: January 12, 2018

Patrick McElyea, Special Assistant U.S. Attornéy, Richard D. Westphal, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Davenport, IA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

William Arthur Cooper, Pro Se

Heather Quick, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Defendant-Appellant

Before GRUENDER, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

William Cooper directly appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that the district court did not clearly err in finding that the government demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that Cooper violated the conditions of his supervised release. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (court may revoke supervised release if it finds by preponderance of evidence that defendant violated conditions of supervised release); United States v. Perkins, 526 F.3d 1107, 1109 (8th Cir. 2008) (fact-finding as to whether violation occurred is reviewed for clear error). Accordingly, we affirm.

1

. The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                  7
<CIK>                                      0001007008
<NAME>                                     VALLEY FORGE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           478,275
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       2,515
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 588,669
<CASH>                                           4,328
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           1,876,871
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          99,264
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,676,068
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              2,295,810
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           39,868
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,500
<OTHER-SE>                                     217,282
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,676,068
<PREMIUMS>                                      81,555
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              8,591
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               1,993
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   1,561
<BENEFITS>                                      75,153
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      2,552
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             9,858
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,137
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,218
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,919
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,919
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    78.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    78.38
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
<FN>
                                       19
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

Reference is herebymade to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1,2014, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., asDepositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer,CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as General Special Servicer, NCB, FSB, as NCBMaster Servicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC,as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as CertificateAdministrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, and WILMINGTON TRUST,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C22 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President ofCommercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of theactivities of the General Master Servicer during the period from January 1,2017 through December 31, 2017, (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2. To the best ofmy knowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February2018.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive VicePresident 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**232/15 KA 11-01614**  PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JAMELL R. MCCULLOUGH, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

EASTON THOMPSON KASPEREK SHIFFRIN LLP, ROCHESTER (BRIAN SHIFFRIN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (NANCY GILLIGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Joseph D. Valentino, J.), rendered November 3, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of murder in the second degree, robbery in the first degree and attempted robbery in the first degree. The judgment was reversed by order of this Court entered March 27, 2015 in a memorandum decision (126 AD3d 1452), and the People on May 21, 2015 were granted leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the order of this Court (25 NY3d 1079), and the Court of Appeals on June 28, 2016 reversed the order and remitted the case to this Court for consideration of the facts and issues raised but not determined on the appeal to this Court (___ NY3d ___ [June 28, 2016]).

Now, upon remittitur from the Court of Appeals and having considered the issues raised but not determined on the appeal to this Court,
It is hereby ORDERED that, upon remittitur from the Court of Appeals, the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: This case is before us upon remittitur from the Court of Appeals ( People v McCullough , ___ NY3d ___, ___ [June 28, 2016], revg 126 AD3d 1452). We previously reversed the judgment convicting defendant upon a jury verdict of, inter alia, murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [3]) and robbery in the first degree (§ 160.15 [4]), holding that Supreme Court abused its discretion in precluding defendant from presenting expert testimony on the reliability of eyewitness identifications. The Court of Appeals reversed our order and held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion as a matter of law when it precluded the introduction of such expert testimony, and the Court remitted the matter to us for consideration of the facts and issues raised but not determined on the appeal ( McCullough , ___ NY3d at ___). We now affirm.**-2- 232/15 KA 11-01614** 

Defendant failed to preserve for our review his remaining contention that the trial court’s ruling concerning the expert testimony in question violated his constitutional rights ( see People v Lane , 7 NY3d 888, 889; People v Chisolm , 57 AD3d 223, 224, lv denied 12 NY3d 782), and we decline to exercise our power to address that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice ( see CPL 470.15 [6] [a]).

Entered: July 8, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
#### IN RE: Lawrence A. ELLIS, Appellant

2016-2372

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

December 13, 2017

Michael Lawrence Oliverio, Polsinelli PC, Boston, MA, argued for appellant.

Philip J. Warrick, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by Nathan *681K. Kelley, Thomas W. Krause, Monica Barnes Lateep.

(Moore, O’Malley, and Wallach, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.