alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1933

JAMSHID FARSHIDI, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NORFOLK STATE UNIVERSITY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-56-2) Submitted: December 3, 2003 Decided: July 27, 2004 Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jamshid Farshidi, Appellant Pro Se. Guy Winston Horsley, Jr., Martha Murphey Parrish, Assistant Attorneys General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Dr. Jamshid Farshidi appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant on his Title VII, due process, and state law claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Dr. Farshidi’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Farshidi v. Norfolk State Univ. , No. CA03-56-2 (E.D. Va. filed July 9, 2003 & entered July 10, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with an Amendment to the Quarterly Report of Migo Software, Inc.,
      formerly known as PowerHouse Technologies Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-QSB/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard Liebman,
      Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
      to my
      knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Richard
              LiebmanRichard
              LiebmanChief
              Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)August 30, 2006
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert BOVE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-7092

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 21, 2017

Decided: December 28, 2017

Robert Bove, Appellant Pro Se. Kimlani M. Ford, Assistant United States Attorney, Elizabeth Margaret Greenough, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Bove seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. *194§ 2253(c)(2) (2012), When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong, *Slack v.*McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); see *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S, 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must' demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the' motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bove has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process,

*DISMISSED*
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function

of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)

CERTIFICATION

I, Kevin
J. Cullum, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Receivables 2014-B Owner Trust
(the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am
responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated party: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association

Date: June 26, 2018



By:

/s/ Kevin J. CullumKevin J. CullumPresident and Chief Executive Officer ofNissan Motor Acceptance Corporation(senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
Part of E.O. 12866 Review: Alternate text for "Regional Haze: Revisions to Provisions Governing Alternatives to Source -Specific Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) Determinations, Limited SIP Disapprovals , and Federal Implementation Plans" ; RIN 2060-AR05 Phil Lorang to: Higgins, Cortney 05/16/2012 10:29 AM Cc: Martha Keating

From: Phil Lorang/RTP/USEPA/US To: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney

_ Higgins@omb.eop.gov> Cc: Martha Keating/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Courtney,
Please convey this to the other participating federal agencies today in preparation for the conversation tomorrow.

RIN 2060-AR05 Alternate text May 16.docx
Phil Lorang, Senior Policy Advisor Air Quality Policy Division, OAQPS, EPA 919-541-5463May 16, 2012 "Regional Haze: Revisions to Provisions Govern ing Alternatives to Source-Specific Best Available Retrofit Technology (BAR T) Determinations, Limited SIP Disapprovals, and Federal Implementation Plans" ; RIN 2060-AR05
The EPA proposed to leave unchanged the exis ting regulatory language regarding geographic enhancements. The purpose of this language is to allow a market-based system to accommodate actions taken under the RAVI provisions. The EPA first adopted such language in the 1999 Regional Haze Rule, 64 FR 35757, and used it agai n in issuing regulations addressing our determination that CAIR provides for greater reasonable progress than BART, 70 FR 39156, and again in issuing regulations addr essing trading program alternatives to BART in general, 71 FR 60612, 60627. In light of the fact that our proposal did not request comment on the interplay of the RAVI requirements in 40 CFR 51.302-306 with th e requirements of the Regional Haze Rule, we are not adopting any clarifying interpretation at this time. As a result, this rulemaking has no effect on the RAVI requirements and the obligatio ns of states (and EPA) under these provisions. We expect at a later date to clarify the scope of the RAVI requirements through a rule amendment, general guidance, or action on a SIP or FIP in the context of a specific RAVI case.* Whatever the form, we intend to provide an opp ortunity for public comment before applying a new interpretation.

__________ * A RAVI certification has been made for the Sherbourne County Generating Station (Sherco) in Minnesota, by the Department of the Interior on October 21, 2009. As Mi nnesota is included in the Transport Rule, the EPA expects that the scope of the RAVI requirements as applied to sources subject to the Trans port Rule will be clarified by action on the certification.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 195 (Friday, October 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62393-62394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-26094]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, October 12, 2011, 9 a.m.-12 p.m.

PLACE: Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Commission Meeting--Open to the Public.

Matters To Be Considered

Decisional Matters

(1) Testing & Certification/Components Parts Final Rules;
(2) Representative--Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; and
(3) Federal Register Notice on HR2715 Questions.
    A live webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at http://www.cpsc.gov/webcast. For a recorded message containing the latest agenda 
information, call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

[[Page 62394]]

    Dated: October 4, 2011.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2011-26094 Filed 10-5-11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 281

Expressing the sense of Congress that Indonesia completes a transition to

a democratically elected, nonmilitary government.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 22, 1998

Mr. STEARNS (for himself, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. KENNEDY

of Rhode Island, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. OLVER, Ms. MCKINNEY, Mr.

KUCINICH, Mr. STRICKLAND, Mr. STARK, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. EVANS,

Mrs. LOWEY, and Mr. SMITH of New Jersey) submitted the following

concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that Indonesia completes

a transition to a democratically elected, nonmilitary government.

Whereas the political situation in Indonesia has been in a

state of chaos;

Whereas innocent people have been killed by Indonesia’s military forces;

Whereas General Suharto has finally resigned, and his vice

president, Joseph Habibie has assumed the presidency of

Indonesia;
2

•HCON 281 IH

Whereas General Suharto came to power through a military

takeover that led to the deaths of a half million Indonesians;

Whereas President Habibie has hand-picked General Suharto

to carry out policies consistent with the past 32 years of

economic exploitation and political repression;

Whereas General Suharto has said that he will remain leader

of the Golkar ruling party;

Whereas President Habibie has declared that he will serve

out the remainder of General Suharto’s term that ends

in March 2003;

Whereas the policies of General Suharto and the Indonesian

military regime have caused the deaths of at least

200,000 people, one-third of the population, in East

Timor;

Whereas the State Department Report on Human Rights reports that in 1997, the Indonesian government ‘‘continued to commit serious human rights abuses’’ and ‘‘demonstrated that it would not tolerate challenges to the fundamental elements of the political system by arresting

and placing on trial some of its critics’’;

Whereas Indonesia continues to imprison democratic, student, labor, religious, and ethnic leaders;

Whereas General Suharto and his family have looted the Indonesian treasury of between $30,000,000,000 and

$40,000,000,000; and

Whereas General Suharto’s cronyism has enabled his friends

to pillage billions of dollars more from the Indonesian

people: Now, therefore, be it
3

•HCON 281 IH

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that the

3 United States should support a complete transition that

4 will lead immediately to a democratically elected, non5 military government in Indonesia including—

6 (1) release of political prisoners;

7 (2) legalization of political organizing activities;

8 (3) international monitoring of human rights

9 conditions;

10 (4) roundtable all party discussions;

11 (5) a transitional government of national unity;

12 (6) democratic elections;

13 (7) a truth commission to address past political

14 crimes; and

15 (8) recognition that past injustices require

16 redress.

Æ
EXHIBIT 31 RULE
13a  14(a) / 15d  14(a) CERTIFICATION  I, Michael J.
Antonoplos certify that: 1. I
have reviewed the this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarter ended March 31, 2008; 2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;  3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a. designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;  b. evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and  c. disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and audit committee of the registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a. all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and b. any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.    Date:
 May 15, 2008 By: /s/
Michael J. Antonoplos Michael
J. Antonoplos Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Pedro GONZALEZ-GARCIA, also known as Roberto Perez Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40538 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 20, 2017

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Pedro Gonzalez-Garcia, Pro Se

Before JONES,. DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Pedro Gonzalez-Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gonzalez-Garcia has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant i to 5th *Cm.*R. *47.5,*the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in *5m*Cir, R, 47.5,4,
| (logo) WELLS

      FARGO | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120

550 South Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|----------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2014, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C24 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.              A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from November 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2.              To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 6th day of March 2015.

                                                                                                

/s/Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President                         

Wells Fargo Bank

 
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
9

Record of Discussion

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD

With whom outside the FAA has this action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? 

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED

GE Mike Philips 10/24/2012 Concur.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other/Additional Information: Mike concur P/N 1656M57G03 should be included to prohibit part 

numbers and provided cost estimate for idle leak check
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00232

- CV

Alicia Ramirez

v.

Craig Deen §

§

§

§ From the 43rd District Court

o f Parker County (CV10

- 0506 )

August 2 8 , 2014

O pinion by Justice Meier



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

It is furth er ordered that Appellant Alicia Ramirez shall pay all costs of this

appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bill Meier

Justice Bill Meier