UNITED
STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington,
D.C. 20549  FORM
10-K  (Mark
One)  ☒ANNUAL
                                         REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934  For
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022  or  ☐TRANSITION
                                         REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934  For
the transition period from _____ to _____  Commission
file number of the issuing entity: 333-191331-06 Central
Index Key Number of the issuing entity: 0001622765 GS
Mortgage Securities Trust 2014-GC26 (exact
name of the issuing entity as specified in its charter)  Central
Index Key Number of the depositor: 0001004158 GS
Mortgage Securities Corporation II (exact
name of the depositor as specified in its charter)  Central
Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001541502 Goldman
Sachs Mortgage Company (exact
name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)  Central
Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001541001 Citigroup
Global Markets Realty Corp. (exact
name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)  Central
Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001558761 Cantor
Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. (exact
name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)  Central
Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001682511 Starwood
Mortgage Funding I LLC (exact
name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)  Central
Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001576832 MC-Five
Mile Commercial Mortgage Finance LLC (exact
name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)  New
    York
    (State or other jurisdiction of
    incorporation or organization of
    the issuing entity)
    38-3951634
    38-3951635
    (I.R.S. Employer
    Identification Numbers)  c/o
U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association
as Certificate Administrator
190 S. LaSalle Street
Chicago, IL
(Address of principal executive offices of the issuing entity)  60603
(Zip Code)  Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code:
(212) 902-1000  Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:  Title
    of each class
    Trading
    Symbol(s)
    Name
    of each exchange on which registeredNone  Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None.  Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ☐  Yes  ☒ No  Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ☐  Yes  ☒ No  Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☒  Yes  ☐ No  Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the registrant was required to submit such files).  Not
applicable.  Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting
company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,”
“smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  Large accelerated filer
    ☐
    Accelerated filer
    ☐Non-accelerated filer
    ☒  (Do not check if a smaller
    reporting company)
    Smaller reporting company
    ☐Emerging growth company
    ☐  If
an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for
complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☐  Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness
of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered
public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐  If securities are
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error
to previously issued financial statements.  ☐  Indicate by check
mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers
during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b).  ☐  Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). ☐  Yes  ☒ No  State
the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price
at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day
of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.  Not
applicable.  Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.  ☐  Yes  ☐ No  Not
applicable.  Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.  Not
applicable.  DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE  List
hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into
which the document is incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders; (2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3)
Any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documents should be clearly described
for identification purposes (e.g., annual report to security holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980).  Not
applicable.   
  EXPLANATORY
NOTES  The
Twin Cities Premium Outlets Mortgage Loan, which constituted approximately 5.2% of the asset pool of the issuing entity as of
its cut-off date, is an asset of the issuing entity and is part of a loan combination that includes the Twin Cities Premium Outlets
Mortgage Loan and one other pari passu loan, which is not an asset of the issuing entity. This loan combination, including
the Twin Cities Premium Outlets Mortgage Loan, is being serviced and administered pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,
which is incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  The
Exhibit Index describes exhibits provided by certain parties (in their capacities indicated on the Exhibit Index) with respect
to the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan, which constituted approximately 1.9% of the asset pool of the issuing entity as of
its cut-off date.  The Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan is an asset of the issuing entity and is part of a loan combination
that includes the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan and three other pari passu loans, which are not assets of the issuing
entity. A pari passu portion of the loan combination was securitized in the WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2014-C22 transaction,
Commission File Number 333-195164-01 (the “WFRBS 2014-C22 Transaction”). This loan combination, including the
Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan, is being serviced and administered pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for the
WFRBS 2014-C22 Transaction, which is incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  The
Exhibit Index describes exhibits provided by certain parties (in their capacities indicated on the Exhibit Index) with respect
to the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan, which constituted approximately 3.7% of the asset pool of the issuing entity as
of its cut-off date.  The Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan is an asset of the issuing entity and is part of a loan combination
that includes the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan and one other pari passu loan, which is not an asset of the issuing
entity. The other pari passu portion of the loan combination was securitized in the Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust
2014-GC25 transaction, Commission File Number 333-189017-06 (the “CGCMT 2014-GC25 Transaction”). This loan
combination, including the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan, is being serviced and administered pursuant to the pooling and
servicing agreement for the CGCMT 2014-GC25 Transaction, which is incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.3 to this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.  The
master servicer of a pooling and servicing agreement or trust and servicing agreement also functions as the primary servicer of
the related mortgage loans serviced and administered pursuant to such agreement unless a separate primary servicer is identified
herein. If this report does not identify a separate primary servicer, the servicer compliance statement provided by the master
servicer under any such agreement also encompasses its responsibilities as primary servicer of the related mortgage loan or mortgage
loans.  Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association is the master servicer of the mortgage loans serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
and the primary servicer of the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan and the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan. As a result,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is a “servicer” as defined in Item 1108(a)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB, in the
capacities described above, because it is servicing mortgage loans that constituted 10% or more of the assets of the issuing entity
as of its cut-off date. The assessments of compliance with applicable servicing criteria, accountants’ attestation reports
and servicer compliance statements delivered by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association in the capacities described above are listed
in the Exhibit Index.  Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association is the custodian of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan, which when combined with its other
capacities described in the preceding paragraph, means that Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is a servicing function participant
with respect to 5% or more of the assets of the issuing entity as of its cut-off date. The assessment of compliance with applicable
servicing criteria and accountants’ attestation report delivered by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association in such capacity is
listed in the Exhibit Index.  Pentalpha
Surveillance LLC is the operating advisor of the mortgage loans serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and the Bank
of America Plaza Mortgage Loan. As a result, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC is a servicing function participant in the capacities
described above, because it is servicing mortgage loans that constituted 5% or more of the assets of the issuing entity as of
its cut-off date. The assessments of compliance with applicable servicing criteria and accountants’ attestation reports
delivered by Pentalpha Surveillance LLC in the capacities described above are listed in the Exhibit Index.  Wilmington
Trust, National Association acts as trustee of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan. Pursuant to the pooling and servicing
agreement for the WFRBS 2014-C22 Transaction, the trustee is required to provide an assessment of compliance with applicable servicing
criteria solely with respect to Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB (regarding advances of funds or guarantees regarding collections,
cash flows or distributions, and any interest or other fees charged for such advances, are made, reviewed and approved as specified
in the transaction agreements). However, during the reporting period, the trustee did not perform any servicing function with
respect to the servicing criteria specified in Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB. The master servicer or the special servicer,
to the extent required, performed the servicing function identified with respect to Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB, and
each such party included Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB in the assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria
and accountant’s attestation report for the subject transaction.  As a result, this Annual Report on Form 10-K does
not include an assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria of the trustee. One or more other servicers of the
Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan have delivered one or more assessments of compliance with respect to Item 1122(d)(2)(iii)
of Regulation AB.  Deutsche
Bank Trust Company Americas acts as trustee of the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan. Pursuant to the pooling and servicing
agreement for the CGCMT 2014-GC25 Transaction, the trustee is required to provide an assessment of compliance with applicable
servicing criteria solely with respect to Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB (regarding advances of funds or guarantees regarding
collections, cash flows or distributions, and any interest or other fees charged for such advances, are made, reviewed and approved
as specified in the transaction agreements). However, during the reporting period, the trustee did not perform any servicing function
with respect to the servicing criteria specified in Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB. The master servicer or the special
servicer, to the extent required, performed the servicing function identified with respect to Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation
AB, and each such party included Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB in the assessment of compliance with applicable servicing
criteria and accountant’s attestation report for the subject transaction.  As a result, this Annual Report on Form
10-K does not include an assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria of the trustee. One or more other servicers
of the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan have delivered one or more assessments of compliance with respect to Item 1122(d)(2)(iii)
of Regulation AB.  This
Annual Report on Form 10-K includes assessments of compliance with applicable servicing criteria and accountants’ attestation
reports from CoreLogic Solutions, LLC.  This entity was engaged by the master servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
and the primary servicer of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan and the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan to remit tax
payments received from the escrow accounts of borrowers to local taxing authorities, to report tax amounts due, to verify tax
parcel information, and to verify non-escrow tax payments. These servicing functions are included within the servicing criteria
set forth in Items 1122(d)(4)(xi) and 1122(d)(4)(xii) of Regulation AB.  Therefore, under the principles-based definition
of “servicer” set forth in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB that looks to the functions that an entity performs, this
vendor is a “servicer” for the purposes of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.  See Compliance and Disclosure
Interpretations, Section 301.01 (Item 1101(j)).  This
Annual Report on Form 10-K includes an assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria, accountants’ attestation
report and servicer compliance statement from Computershare Trust Company, National Association (“CTCNA”). 
CTCNA was engaged by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”), in its capacity as custodian,
to perform certain specified servicing functions identified in the assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria
and accountants’ attestation reports. Wells Fargo engaged CTCNA in connection with the sale of Wells Fargo’s corporate
trust services business to CTCNA and its affiliates.  The
assessments of compliance with applicable servicing criteria, accountants’ attestation reports and servicer compliance statements
of the certificate administrator of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan and the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan are
omitted from this Annual Report on Form 10-K as the certificate administrator pursuant to the related pooling and servicing agreement
or trust and servicing agreement does not perform any activities that address servicing criteria with respect to the issuing entity
and because they are each not a “servicer” that meets the criteria in Item 1108(a)(2)(i) through (iii) of Regulation
AB.  With
respect to the pari passu loan combinations that include the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan and the Fenley Office
Portfolio Mortgage Loan, (i) the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria and attestation reports on assessment
of compliance with servicing criteria of CWCapital Asset Management LLC as special servicer of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage
Loan, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association as special servicer of the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage
Loan, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as custodian of the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan and Park Bridge Lender Services
LLC as operating advisor of the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan, listed on the Exhibit Index are omitted from this Annual
Report on Form 10-K as they are not required to be included on this Annual Report on Form 10-K per Instruction 3 to Item 1122
of Regulation AB because they are parties performing activities that address servicing criteria relating to 5% or less of the
assets of the issuing entity; and (ii) the servicer compliance statements of CWCapital Asset Management LLC as special servicer
of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan and Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association as special
servicer of the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan, listed on the Exhibit Index are omitted from this Annual Report on Form
10-K as they are not required by Item 1123 of Regulation AB to be included on this Annual Report on Form 10-K because they are
each an unaffiliated party that is not a “servicer” that meets the criteria in Item 1108(a)(2)(i) through (iii) of
Regulation AB.  PART
I  Item
1. Business.  Omitted.  Item
1A. Risk Factors.  Omitted.  Item
1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.  None.  Item
2. Properties.  Omitted.  Item
3. Legal Proceedings.  Omitted.  Item
4. Mine Safety Disclosures.  Not
applicable.  PART
II  Item
5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.  Omitted.  Item
6.  [Reserved]  Omitted.  Item
7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.  Omitted.  Item
8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.  Omitted.  Item
9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.  Omitted.  Item
9A. Controls and Procedures.  Omitted.  Item
9B. Other Information.  None.  Item
9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections.  None.  PART
III  Item
10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.  Omitted.  Item
11. Executive Compensation.  Omitted.  Item
12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.  Omitted.  Item
13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.  Omitted.  Item
14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.  Omitted.  ADDITIONAL
DISCLOSURE ITEMS FOR REGULATION AB  Item
1112(b) of Regulation AB, Significant Obligor Financial Information.  No
single obligor represents 10% or more of the pool assets held by the issuing entity.  Item
1114(b)(2) of Regulation AB, Significant Enhancement Provider Financial Information.  No
entity or group of affiliated entities provides any external credit enhancement or other support for the certificates within this
transaction as described under Item 1114(a) of Regulation AB.  Item
1115(b) of Regulation AB, Certain Derivatives Instruments (Financial Information).  No
entity or group of affiliated entities provides any derivative instruments or other support for the certificates within this transaction
as described under Item 1115 of Regulation AB.  Item
1117 of Regulation AB, Legal Proceedings.  The
registrant knows of no material pending legal proceeding involving the trust or any party related to the trust, other than routine
litigation incidental to the duties of those respective parties, and the following, with respect to Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas, as Trustee and Custodian, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Certificate Administrator and Custodian, Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator and Custodian, and CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer.  Deutsche
Bank Trust Company Americas (“DBTCA”) and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“DBNTC”) have been sued
by investors in civil litigation concerning their role as trustees of certain residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”)
trusts.  On
June 18, 2014, a group of investors, including funds managed by Blackrock Advisors, LLC, PIMCO-Advisors, L.P., and others, filed
an action against DBNTC and DBTCA in New York State Supreme Court alleging that DBNTC and DBTCA failed to perform purported duties,
as trustees for 544 private-label RMBS trusts, to enforce breaches of representations and warranties as to mortgage loans held
by the trusts and to enforce breaches by servicers of their mortgage loan servicing obligations for the trusts. During the course
of the litigation, plaintiffs dismissed the case from New York State Supreme Court and refiled two separate cases, one in the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “BlackRockSDNY Case”) and the other in the
Superior Court of California, Orange County (the “BlackRockCalifornia Case”). Pursuant to a settlement among
the parties, the BlackRockSDNY Case was dismissed on December 6, 2018, and the BlackRockCalifornia Case was dismissed
on January 11, 2019.  On
September 27, 2017, DBTCA was added as a defendant to a case brought by certain special purpose entities including Phoenix Light
SF Limited in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, in which the plaintiffs previously alleged incorrectly
that DBNTC served as trustee for all 43 of the trusts at issue. On September 27, 2017, plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint
that names DBTCA as a defendant in addition to DBNTC. DBTCA serves as trustee for one of the 43 trusts at issue. DBNTC serves
as trustee for the other 42 trusts at issue. Plaintiffs’ third amended complaint brings claims for violation of the U.S.
Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (“TIA”); breach of contract; breach of fiduciary duty; negligence and gross negligence;
violation of New York’s Streit Act; and breach of the covenant of good faith. However, in the third amended complaint, plaintiffs
acknowledge that, before DBTCA was added to the case, the court dismissed plaintiffs’ TIA Act claims, negligence and gross
negligence claims, Streit Act claims, claims for breach of the covenant of good faith, and certain theories of plaintiffs’
breach of contract claims, and plaintiffs only include these claims to preserve any rights on appeal. Plaintiffs allege damages
of “hundreds of millions of dollars.” On November 13, 2017, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the third amended complaint.
On December 7, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a motion for summary judgment. Also on December 7, 2018, plaintiffs, jointly with Commerzbank
AG (see description of Commerzbank case below), filed a motion for partial summary judgment. On October 27, 2021, DBNTC and DBTCA
filed a supplemental motion for summary judgment relating to plaintiffs’ standing. On February 8, 2022, the court issued
an order in which it granted DBNTC and DBTCA’s supplemental motion for summary judgment, granted in part DBNTC and DBTCA’s
initial motion for summary judgment, and denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment. As a result of that order,
all of plaintiffs’ claims were dismissed with prejudice. On March 10, 2022, plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the United
States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit with respect to the court’s orders on the motions to dismiss and for summary
judgment.  On
November 30, 2017, DBTCA was added as a defendant to a case brought by Commerzbank AG (“Commerzbank”) in the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of New York, in which Commerzbank previously alleged incorrectly that DBNTC served as
trustee for all 50 of the trusts at issue. On November 30, 2017, Commerzbank filed a second amended complaint that names DBTCA
as a defendant in addition to DBNTC. DBTCA serves as trustee for 1 of the 50 trusts at issue. DBNTC serves as trustee for the
other 49 trusts at issue. Commerzbank’s second amended complaint brings claims for violation of the TIA; breach of contract;
breach of fiduciary duty; negligence; violation of the Streit Act; and breach of the covenant of good faith. However, in the second
amended complaint, Commerzbank acknowledges that, before DBTCA was added to the case, the court dismissed Commerzbank’s
TIA claims for the trusts governed by pooling and servicing agreements, as well as its Streit Act claims and claims for breach
of the covenant of good faith, and Commerzbank only includes these claims to preserve any rights on appeal. The second amended
complaint alleges that DBNTC and DBTCA caused Commerzbank to suffer “hundreds of millions of dollars in losses,” but
the complaint does not include a demand for money damages in a sum certain. On January 29, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer
to the second amended complaint. On December 7, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a motion for summary judgment. Also on December 7,
2018, Commerzbank, jointly with the Phoenix Lightplaintiffs, filed a motion for partial summary judgment. On February
8, 2022, the court issued an order in which it granted in part DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion for summary judgment and denied
plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment. As a result of that order, many of plaintiffs’ claims and theories
were dismissed with prejudice. Discovery is ongoing.  On
December 30, 2015, IKB International, S.A. in Liquidation and IKB Deutsche Industriebank A.G. (collectively, “IKB”),
as an investor in 37 RMBS trusts, filed a summons with notice in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County,
against DBNTC and DBTCA as trustees of the trusts. On May 27, 2016, IKB served its complaint asserting claims for breach of contract,
breach of fiduciary duty, breach of duty to avoid conflicts of interest, violation of the Streit Act, violation of the TIA, violation
of Regulation AB, and violation of Section 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code. IKB alleges that DBNTC and DBTCA are liable for over
U.S. $268 million in damages. On October 5, 2016, DBNTC and DBTCA, together with several other trustees defending lawsuits by
IKB, filed a joint motion to dismiss. On January 6, 2017 and June 20, 2017, IKB voluntarily dismissed with prejudice all claims
as to seven trusts. On January 27, 2021, the court granted in part and denied in part DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion to dismiss.
The court granted the motion to dismiss with respect to IKB’s claims for violations of the Streit Act, Regulation AB, and
Section 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code, as well as certain aspects of IKB’s claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary
duty, and violation of the TIA. The court denied the remainder of the motion to dismiss. IKB’s remaining claims for breach
of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of duty to avoid conflicts of interest, and violation of the TIA will proceed. On
May 10, 2021, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a notice of appeal with the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division, First Department, regarding
certain aspects of the court’s order on the motion to dismiss. On May 20, 2021, IKB filed a notice of cross appeal with
respect to other aspects of that order. On August 30, 2022, the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department affirmed
in part and reversed in part the court’s order on the motion to dismiss. On November 10, 2022, the First Department granted
DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, and denied IKB’s separate motion for reargument
and leave to appeal. On June 2, 2021, IKB filed a motion for re-argument regarding certain aspects of the court’s order
on the motion to dismiss, which the court denied on August 3, 2021. On May 13, 2021, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the complaint.
On October 28, 2021, the parties filed a stipulation, voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to seven additional
trusts. On December 29, 2021, the parties filed a stipulation, voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to one additional
trust. On April 22, 2022, the parties filed a stipulation, voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to 17 certificates
at issue (including all claims as to 5 trusts), leaving 17 trusts at issue. Discovery is ongoing.  It
is DBTCA’s belief that it has no pending legal proceedings (including, based on DBTCA’s present evaluation, the litigation
disclosed in the foregoing paragraphs) that would materially affect its ability to perform its duties under the related servicing
agreement.  In
the last several years, U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”) and other large financial institutions have been
sued in their capacity as trustee or successor trustee for certain residential mortgage backed securities (“RMBS”) trusts.
The complaints, primarily filed by investors or investor groups against U.S. Bank and similar institutions, allege the trustees
caused losses to investors as a result of alleged failures by the sponsors, mortgage loan sellers and servicers to comply with
the governing agreements for these RMBS trusts. Plaintiffs generally assert causes of action based upon the trustees’ purported
failures to enforce repurchase obligations of mortgage loan sellers for alleged breaches of representations and warranties, notify
securityholders of purported events of default allegedly caused by breaches of servicing standards by mortgage loan servicers
and abide by a heightened standard of care following alleged events of default.  U.S.
Bank denies liability and believes that it has performed its obligations under the RMBS trusts in good faith, that its actions
were not the cause of losses to investors, that it has meritorious defenses, and it has contested and intends to continue contesting
the plaintiffs’ claims vigorously. However, U.S. Bank cannot assure you as to the outcome of any of the litigation, or the
possible impact of these litigations on the trustee or the RMBS trusts.  On
March 9, 2018, a law firm purporting to represent fifteen Delaware statutory trusts (the “DSTs”) that issued securities
backed by student loans (the “Student Loans”) filed a lawsuit in the Delaware Court of Chancery against U.S. Bank
National Association (“U.S. Bank”) in its capacities as indenture trustee and successor special servicer, and three
other institutions in their respective transaction capacities, with respect to the DSTs and the Student Loans. This lawsuit is
captioned The National Collegiate Student Loan Master Trust I, et al. v. U.S. Bank National Association, et al., C.A. No. 2018-0167-JRS
(Del. Ch.) (the “NCMSLT Action”). The complaint, as amended on June 15, 2018, alleged that the DSTs have been harmed
as a result of purported misconduct or omissions by the defendants concerning administration of the trusts and special servicing
of the Student Loans. Since the filing of the NCMSLT Action, certain Student Loan borrowers have made assertions against U.S.
Bank concerning special servicing that appear to be based on certain allegations made on behalf of the DSTs in the NCMSLT Action.  U.S.
Bank believes that it has performed its obligations as indenture trustee and special servicer in good faith and in compliance
in all material respects with the terms of the agreements governing the DSTs (the “Governing Agreements”), and accordingly
that the claims against it in the NCMSLT Action are without merit.  U.S.
Bank has filed a motion seeking dismissal of the operative complaint in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Chancery Court
Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) or, in the alternative, a stay of the case while other prior filed disputes involving the DSTs and
the Student Loans are litigated. On November 7, 2018, the Court ruled that the case should be stayed in its entirety pending resolution
of the first-filed cases. On January 21, 2020, the Court entered an order consolidating for pretrial purposes the NCMSLT Action
and three other lawsuits pending in the Delaware Court of Chancery concerning the DSTs and the Student Loans (the “Consolidated
Action”). U.S. Bank and other parties to the Consolidated Action have briefed and argued motions for judgment on the pleadings
pursuant to Chancery Court Rule 12(c) regarding disputed issues of contractual interpretation at issue in one or more of the cases
comprising the Consolidated Action, including the NCMSLT Action. The Court has not yet ruled on these motions or on U.S. Bank’s
dismissal motion in the NCMSLT Action.  In
December 2014, Phoenix Light SF Limited (Phoenix Light) and certain related entities filed a complaint in the United States District
Court for the Southern District of New York alleging claims against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., in its capacity as trustee for a number
of residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) trusts. Complaints raising similar allegations have been filed by Commerzbank
AG in the Southern District of New York and by IKB International and IKB Deutsche Industriebank in New York state court. In each
case, the plaintiffs allege that Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee, caused losses to investors, and plaintiffs assert causes
of action based upon, among other things, the trustee’s alleged failure to notify and enforce repurchase obligations of
mortgage loan sellers for purported breaches of representations and warranties, notify investors of alleged events of default,
and abide by appropriate standards of care following alleged events of default. In July 2022, the district court dismissed Phoenix
Light’s claims and certain of the claims asserted by Commerzbank AG, and subsequently entered judgment in each case in favor
of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. In August 2022, Phoenix Light and Commerzbank AG appealed the district court’s decision to the
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Company previously settled two class actions filed by institutional
investors and an action filed by the National Credit Union Administration with similar allegations. In addition, Park Royal I
LLC and Park Royal II LLC have filed substantially similar lawsuits in New York state court alleging Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as
trustee, failed to take appropriate actions upon learning of defective mortgage loan documentation.  From
time to time, CWCapital Asset Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“CWCAM”), is a party to lawsuits
and other legal proceedings as part of its duties as a special servicer (e.g., enforcement of loan obligations) and/or arising
in the ordinary course of business. Other than as set forth in the following paragraphs, there are currently no legal proceedings
pending, and no legal proceedings known to be contemplated by governmental authorities, against CWCAM or of which any of its property
is the subject, that are material to the certificateholders.  On
December 17, 2015, U.S. Bank National Association, the trustee under five pooling and servicing agreements for (i) Wachovia Bank
Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C30, (ii) COBALT CMBS Commercial Trust 2007-C2, (iii) Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C31,
(iv) ML-CFC Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-5 and (v) ML-CFC Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-6 commenced a proceeding with the Second
Judicial District Court of Ramsey County, Minnesota (the “State Court”) for a declaratory judgment as to the proper
allocation of certain proceeds (“Disputed Proceeds”) received by CWCAM in connection with the sale of the Peter Cooper
Village and Stuyvesant Town property in New York, New York securing loans held by those trusts. CWCAM was the special servicer
of such property. The petition requests the State Court to instruct the trustee, the trust beneficiaries, and any other interested
parties as to the amount of the Disputed Proceeds, if any, that constitute penalty interest and/or the amount of the Disputed
Proceeds, if any, that constitute gain-on-sale proceeds, with respect to each trust. On February 24, 2016, CWCAM made a limited
appearance with the State Court to file a motion to dismiss this proceeding based on lack of jurisdiction, mootness, standing
and forum non conveniens. On July 19, 2016, the State Court denied CWCAM’s motion to dismiss. On July 22, 2016, the action
was removed to federal court in Minnesota (“Federal Court”). On October 21, 2016, the Federal Court held a hearing
on the motion to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“SDNY Court”),
a motion to remand to state court and a motion to hear CWCAM’s request for reconsideration of the motion to dismiss. On
March 14, 2017, the Federal Court reserved the determination on the motion to hear CWCAM’s request for reconsideration of
the motion to dismiss, denied the motion to remand the matter to state court and granted the motion to transfer the proceeding
to the SDNY Court. Cross motions for judgment on the pleadings were filed but the SDNY Court was unable to decide the case based
on the pleadings and the SDNY Court ordered discovery. All fact discovery was completed in December, 2018 and expert discovery
was completed on March 15, 2019. The parties submitted cross motions for summary judgment, and on March 19, 2020, the SDNY Court
entered an opinion and order in which it granted summary judgment in CWCAM’s favor and held that CWCAM was entitled to the
entire amount of penalty interest and that CWCAM’s determination of Yield Maintenance was correct. In the 127-page opinion,
the SDNY Court found for CWCAM on every issue presented by the trustee’s petition, namely, that the funds in dispute constitute
penalty interest and yield maintenance, not gain-on-sale proceeds, and that the amount of penalty interest and yield maintenance
was correctly calculated. An appeal of the SDNY Court’s decision was taken on April 29, 2020. Oral argument on the appeal
occurred on June 21, 2021. On July 14, 2022, the Second Circuit entered a decision affirming in part and reversing in part the
SDNY Court’s decision and remanding to the SDNY Court for further proceedings. The Second Circuit affirmed the SDNY’s
Court holding that Penalty Interest and Yield Maintenance are paid before Gain-On-Sale Proceeds. The Second Circuit reversed and
remanded for further proceedings that portion of the SDNY Court’s decision related to approximately $67.2 million in interest
on advances. On January 13, 2023, the parties entered into a settlement agreement, in which (among other things) they agreed to
stipulate that the amount of interest on advances that accrued on or before June 3, 2014 is $27.5 million, and that CWCAM would
pay that amount into escrow for distribution to certificateholders upon the entry of an order by the Court approving the settlement.
U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for the trusts, provided notice of the settlement to all parties in interest via a
notice program approved by the Court. A hearing on the settlement is scheduled for March 16, 2023.  On
December 1, 2017, a complaint against CWCAM and others was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District
of New York styled as CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd. v. CWCapital Investments LLC, et al., No. 17-cv-9463 (the “Original Complaint”).
The gravamen of the Original Complaint alleged breaches of a contract and fiduciary duties by CWCAM’s affiliate, CWCapital
Investments LLC in its capacity as collateral manager for the collateralized debt obligation transaction involving CWCapital Cobalt
Vr, Ltd. In total, there are 14 counts pled in the Original Complaint. Of those 14, 5 claims were asserted against CWCAM for aiding
and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, conversion and unjust enrichment. On May 23, 2018, the Original Complaint was dismissed
for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On June 28, 2018, CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd. filed a substantially similar complaint in
the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York styled as CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd. v. CWCapital Investments LLC,
et al., Index No. 653277/2018 (the “New Complaint”). The gravamen of the New Complaint is the same as the previous
complaint filed in the United State District Court for the Southern District of New York. In total there are 16 counts pled in
the New Complaint. Of those 16 counts, 5 claims were asserted against CWCAM for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty,
conversion and unjust enrichment, 1 count seeks a declaratory judgement that the plaintiff has the right to enforce the contracts
in question and 1 count seeks an injunction requiring the defendants to recognize the plaintiff as the directing holder for the
trusts in question. On January 11, 2019, the plaintiff dismissed with prejudice the declaratory judgment and injunction counts.
The New Complaint and related summons was not served on the defendants until July 13, 2018 and July 16, 2018. The plaintiff’s
motion for a preliminary injunction was denied by the court on July 31, 2018. On August 3, 2018, the defendants, including CWCAM,
filed a motion to dismiss the New Complaint in its entirety. On August 20, 2019, the court entered an order granting defendants’
motion almost in its entirety, dismissing 11 of the 16 counts and partially dismissing 2 additional counts. Of the remaining counts,
2 are asserted against CWCAM for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment. On September 19, 2019, CWCapital
Cobalt Vr Ltd. filed a notice of appeal relating to the August 20, 2019 dismissal order and on September 26, 2019, filed an amended
complaint against CWCI and CWCAM attempting to address deficiencies relating to certain of the claims dismissed by the August
20, 2019 order. CWCI and CWCAM filed its Motion to Dismiss the amended complaint on October 28, 2019. The court heard argument
on the Motion to Dismiss the amended complaint on January 22, 2020 and on October 23, 2020, the court granted the motion dismissing
the amended claims. On November 30, 2020, CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd filed a notice of appeal relating to the October 23, 2020 dismissal
order. On April 27, 2021, the First Department affirmed the dismissal as to claims against CWCAM that were part of the August
20, 2019 dismissal, but reversed the dismissal of two counts for breach of the Collateral Management Agreement against CWCI. CWCI
sought leave to file an appeal of the decision. The plaintiff also sought leave to appeal the dismissal of the claims against
CWCAM. Both requests for leave were denied by the First Department. On May 15, 2020, CWCI and CWCAM filed a motion to renew its
motion to dismiss as to 4 of the remaining counts (including the remaining two counts against CWCAM for aiding and abetting breach
of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment), based on a decision entered by Judge Failla in a trust instruction proceeding in the
US District Court for the Southern District of New York awarding summary judgment in favor of CWCAM. On September 7, 2021, the
court denied the motion to renew. CWCI and CWCAM filed a notice of appeal, which they perfected by the filing of their opening
brief on July 1, 2022. On November 15, 2022, the First Department affirmed the court’s denial of the motion to renew. On
October 1, 2021, CWCI and CWCAM moved to reargue the denial of the motion to renew (or alternatively, the motion to dismiss) with
respect to certain of Cobalt’s claims, including the remaining 2 claims against CWCAM, based on the First Department’s
April 27, 2021 decision. On March 24, 2022, the court denied the relief sought in the motion to reargue. CWCI and CWCAM have appealed
the court’s decision on the motion to reargue and filed their opening brief on July 11, 2022. The appeal was dismissed as
being non-appealable on August 30, 2022. CWCAM believes that it has performed its obligations under the related pooling and servicing
agreements in good faith and the remaining allegations in the New Complaint are without merit.  Item
1119 of Regulation AB, Affiliations and Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.  The
information regarding this Item has been previously provided in a prospectus supplement of the Registrant relating to the issuing
entity filed on December 8, 2014 pursuant to Rule 424(b)(5).  Item
1122 of Regulation AB, Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria.  The
reports on assessments of compliance with the servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on
such assessments of compliance with respect to the mortgage loans are attached hereto under Item 15 to this Annual Report on Form
10-K. Attached as Exhibit O to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.1 to this Annual Report
on Form 10-K is a chart identifying the entities participating in a servicing function for the transaction responsible for each
applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d).  The
reports on assessments of compliance with the servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on
such assessments of compliance with respect to the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan, which is being serviced and administered
pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for the WFRBS 2014-C22 Transaction, are attached hereto under Item 15 to this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attached as Schedule III to the pooling and servicing agreement for the WFRBS 2014-C22 Transaction
incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K is a chart identifying the entities participating
in a servicing function for the WFRBS 2014-C22 Transaction responsible for each applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d).  The
reports on assessments of compliance with the servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on
such assessments of compliance with respect to the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan, which is being serviced and administered
pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for the CGCMT 2014-GC25 Transaction, are attached hereto under Item 15 to this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attached as Exhibit O to the pooling and servicing agreement for the CGCMT 2014-GC25 Transaction incorporated
by reference as Exhibit 4.3 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K is a chart identifying the entities participating in a servicing
function for the CGCMT 2014-GC25 Transaction responsible for each applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d).  Item
1123 of Regulation AB, Servicer Compliance Statement.  The
servicer compliance statements are attached as Exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  PART
IV  Item
15. Exhibit and Financial Statement Schedules  (a)
The following is a list of documents filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:  (1)
Not applicable  (2)
Not applicable  (3)
See below  4.1Pooling
                                         and Servicing Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2014, by and among GS Mortgage Securities
                                         Corporation II, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer,
                                         LNR Partners, LLC, as General Special Servicer, CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Cypresswood
                                         Court Shopping Center Special Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor,
                                         U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator and U.S. Bank National Association,
                                         as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K
                                         filed on December 8, 2014 under Commission File No. 333-191331-06 and incorporated by
                                         reference herein).  4.2Pooling
                                         and Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2014, by and among Wells Fargo Commercial
                                         Mortgage Securities, Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as General
                                         Master Servicer, CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as General Special Servicer, NCB, FSB,
                                         as NCB Master Servicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Special Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC,
                                         as Trust Advisor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator,
                                         as Tax Administrator and as Custodian and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as
                                         Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
                                         on December 8, 2014 under Commission File No. 333-191331-06 and incorporated by reference
                                         herein).  4.3Pooling
                                         and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2014, by and among Citigroup Commercial
                                         Mortgage Securities Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master
                                         Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special
                                         Servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, Citibank, N.A., as Certificate
                                         Administrator, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee (filed as Exhibit
                                         4.3 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 8, 2014 under
                                         Commission File No. 333-191331-06 and incorporated by reference herein).  10.1Mortgage
                                         Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2014, between GS Mortgage Securities
                                         Corporation II and Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s
                                         Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 8, 2014 under Commission File No. 333-191331-06
                                         and incorporated by reference herein)  10.2Mortgage
                                         Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2014, between GS Mortgage Securities
                                         Corporation II and Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the
                                         registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 8, 2014 under Commission
                                         File No. 333-191331-06 and incorporated by reference herein)  10.3Mortgage
                                         Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2014, between GS Mortgage Securities
                                         Corporation II and Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.4
                                         to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 8, 2014 under
                                         Commission File No. 333-191331-06 and incorporated by reference herein)  10.4Mortgage
                                         Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2014, between GS Mortgage Securities
                                         Corporation II and Starwood Mortgage Funding I LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the registrant’s
                                         Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 8, 2014 under Commission File No. 333-191331-06
                                         and incorporated by reference herein)  10.5Mortgage
                                         Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2014, between GS Mortgage Securities
                                         Corporation II and MC-Five Mile Commercial Mortgage Finance LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.5
                                         to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 8, 2014 under
                                         Commission File No. 333-191331-06 and incorporated by reference herein)  31Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.  33Reports
                                         on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities.  33.1Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer  33.2LNR Partners, LLC, as General Special Servicer  33.3U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee and Certificate Administrator prior to October 17, 2022  33.4U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as Trustee and Certificate Administrator on and after October 17, 2022 (see Exhibit 33.3)  33.5U.S. Bank National Association, as Custodian (see Exhibit 33.3)  33.6Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor  33.7CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant  33.8Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer of the Twin Cities Premium Outlets Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.1)  33.9LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer of the Twin Cities Premium Outlets Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.2)  33.10U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee of the Twin Cities Premium Outlets Mortgage Loan prior to October 17, 2022 (see Exhibit 33.3)  33.11U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as Trustee of the Twin Cities Premium Outlets Mortgage Loan on and after October 17, 2022 (see Exhibit 33.3)  33.12U.S. Bank National Association, as Custodian of the Twin Cities Premium Outlets Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.3)  33.13Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor of the Twin Cities Premium Outlets Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.6)  33.14CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant of the Twin Cities Premium Outlets Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.7)  33.15Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.1)  33.16CWCapital
                                         Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan
                                         (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)  33.17Wilmington
                                         Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan (Omitted.
                                         See Explanatory Notes.)  33.18Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan  33.19Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.6)  33.20CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.7)  33.21Computershare Trust Company, National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian  33.22Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer of the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.1)  33.23Midland
                                         Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer of the
                                         Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)  33.24Deutsche
                                         Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee and Custodian of the Fenley Office Portfolio
                                         Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)  33.25Park
                                         Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor of the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage
                                         Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)  33.26CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant of the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.7)  34Attestation
                                         reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities.  34.1Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer  34.2LNR Partners, LLC, as General Special Servicer  34.3U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee and Certificate Administrator prior to October 17, 2022  34.4U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as Trustee and Certificate Administrator on and after October 17, 2022 (see Exhibit 34.3)  34.5U.S. Bank National Association, as Custodian (see Exhibit 34.3)  34.6Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor  34.7CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant  34.8Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer of the Twin Cities Premium Outlets Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.1)  34.9LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer of the Twin Cities Premium Outlets Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.2)  34.10U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee of the Twin Cities Premium Outlets Mortgage Loan prior to October 17, 2022 (see Exhibit 34.3)  34.11U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as Trustee of the Twin Cities Premium Outlets Mortgage Loan on and after October 17, 2022 (see Exhibit 34.3)  34.12U.S. Bank National Association, as Custodian of the Twin Cities Premium Outlets Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.3)  34.13Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor of the Twin Cities Premium Outlets Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.6)  34.14CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant of the Twin Cities Premium Outlets Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.7)  34.15Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.1)  34.16CWCapital
                                         Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan
                                         (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)  34.17Wilmington
                                         Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan (Omitted.
                                         See Explanatory Notes.)  34.18Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan  34.19Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.6)  34.20CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.7)  34.21Computershare Trust Company, National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian  34.22Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer of the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.1)  34.23Midland
                                         Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer of the
                                         Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)  34.24Deutsche
                                         Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee and Custodian of the Fenley Office Portfolio
                                         Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)  34.25Park
                                         Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor of the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage
                                         Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)  34.26CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant of the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.7)  35Servicer
                                         compliance statements.  35.1Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer  35.2LNR Partners, LLC, as General Special Servicer  35.3U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator prior to October 17, 2022  35.4U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as Certificate Administrator on and after October 17, 2022 (see Exhibit 35.3)  35.5Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer of the Twin Cities Premium Outlets Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 35.1)  35.6LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer of the Twin Cities Premium Outlets Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 35.2)  35.7Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 35.1)  35.8CWCapital
                                         Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan
                                         (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)  35.9Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer of the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 35.1)  35.10Midland
                                         Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer of the
                                         Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)  (b)The
exhibits required to be filed by the Registrant pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed above.  (c)Not
Applicable.  SIGNATURES  Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.  GS
Mortgage Securities Corporation II
(Depositor)  /s/
    Scott Epperson Scott
Epperson, Chief Executive Officer
(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)  Date:
March 27, 2023