alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         135,555
<SECURITIES>                                    96,729
<RECEIVABLES>                                   99,576
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,120
<INVENTORY>                                     11,544
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               358,013
<PP&E>                                          86,293
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,720
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 437,927
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           98,945
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            64
<OTHER-SE>                                     338,918
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   437,927
<SALES>                                        161,268
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               161,268
<CGS>                                           24,574
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,574
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,325
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 88,629
<INCOME-TAX>                                    35,452
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    53,177
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.80
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned officer of USA Capital Management, Inc.. (the "Company"), hereby
certify to my knowledge that:



The Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2016 of
the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.



| | /s/ Richard Meruelo    
| | -----------------------
| | Chief Executive Officer
| | Chief Financial Officer



Date: March 27, 2017
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Julian HERNANDEZ-MOTA, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40581 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed January 19, 2018

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Julian Hernandez-Mota, Pro Se

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Julian Hernandez-Mota has moved, for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez-Mota has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

*307Notwithstanding that determination, we note a clerical error in the judgment. Hernandez-Mota pleaded guilty to attempted illegal reentry of a deported alien, while the written judgment states that his offense is reentry of a deported alien. The offense of attempted illegal reentry is a separate and distinct offense from the other means of committing a violation of the illegal reentry statute. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1326; *United States v. Buendia-Rangel,*553 F.3d 378, 379 & n.1 (5th Cir. 2008); *United States v. Angeles-Mascote,*206 F.3d 529, 531 (5th Cir. 2000).

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2. The case is REMANDED to the district court for the limited purpose of correcting the clerical error in the judgment, *See*Fed. R. Crim. P. 36.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 21

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment of both Houses.
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 21

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Thursday, February 13, 1997, it stand ad4 journed until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, February 25, 1997,

5 or until noon on the second day after Members are notified
2

•HCON 21 EH

1 to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent res2 olution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate

3 adjourns or recesses at the close of business on Thursday,

4 February 13, 1997, pursuant to a motion made by the

5 Majority Leader, or his designee, in accordance with this

6 concurrent resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned until

7 11:30 a.m. on Monday, February 24, 1997, or such time

8 on that day as may be specified by the Majority Leader

9 or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until

10 noon on the second day after Members are notified to reas11 semble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution,

12 whichever occurs first.

13 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

14 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

15 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead16 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House

17 and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

18 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Passed the House of Representatives February 13,

1997.

Attest:

Clerk.
Order entered October 8, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00349-CR

RONALD GAYLON ROSSER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 199-81000-2015

ORDER

Before the Court are court reporter Sheri J. Vecera’s September 30, 2019 request for a 

short extension of time to file the reporter’s record and October 3, 2019 letter requesting another 

short extension. The reporter’s record was received on October 7, 2019.

We GRANT Ms. Vecera’s requests and ORDER the reporter’s record filed as of 

October 7, 2019.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 57 (Thursday, March 24, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 16737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06233]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

[Docket No. 22-06]


Royal White Cement, Inc., Complainant v. CMA CGM S.A. and CMA CGM 
(America) LLC, Respondent; Notice of Filing of Complaint and Assignment

Served: March 21, 2022.
    Notice is given that a complaint has been filed with the Federal 
Maritime Commission (Commission) by Royal White Cement, Inc., 
hereinafter ``Complainant'', against CMA CGM S.A. and CMA CGM (America) 
LLC, ``Respondents''. Complainant alleges that Respondent CMA CGM S.A. 
is a French corporation or similar form of entity, and that Respondent 
CMA CGM (America) LLC is a New Jersey limited liability company. 
Complainant alleges that Respondents are common carriers.
    Complainant alleges that Respondents violated 46 U.S.C. 41102(c) 
with regard to refusal to accept bookings and provide equipment to 
accomplish such bookings pursuant to an agreed service contract. The 
full text of the complaint can be found in the Commission's Electronic 
Reading Room at https://www2.fmc.gov/readingroom/proceeding/22-06/.
    This proceeding has been assigned to Office of Administrative Law 
Judges. The initial decision of the presiding office in this proceeding 
shall be issued by March 21, 2023, and the final decision of the 
Commission shall be issued by October 5, 2023.

William Cody,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-06233 Filed 3-23-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-02-P
No. 11-10272.

#### Mare *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-50029

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

BALTAZAR GONZALEZ-VILLA

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:07-CR-1696-ALL

Before JOLLY, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Baltazar Gonzalez-Villa

raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,

523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty

provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. PinedaArrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 872 (2008).

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

July 9, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-50029

2

The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited balance sheet of Lucent at December 31, 2000 and the unaudited
consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended December 31,
2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>          1,000,000
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       SEP-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                           OCT-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                        3,814
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 7,837
<ALLOWANCES>                                    551
<INVENTORY>                                   6,879
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             22,909
<PP&E>                                       14,433
<DEPRECIATION>                                7,295
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               50,041
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        12,473
<BONDS>                                       3,099
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                         34
<OTHER-SE>                                   25,714
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 50,041
<SALES>                                       5,841
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              5,841
<CGS>                                         4,530
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 4,530
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              1,285
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                370
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              129
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (2,258)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (679)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (1,579)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               1,154
<CHANGES>                                        30
<NET-INCOME>                                   (395)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.12)



</TABLE>
H. Con. Res. 169 Agreed to October 9, 1997

One Hundred Fifth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-seven

Concurrent Resolution

Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of

Thursday, October 9, 1997, it stand adjourned until 10:30 a.m.

on Tuesday, October 21, 1997, or until noon on the second day

after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2

of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when

the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on Thursday, October 9, 1997, Friday, October 10, 1997, or Saturday, October

11, 1997, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority Leader,

or his designee, in accordance with this concurrent resolution, it

stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, October 20,

1997, or such time on that day as may be specified by the Majority

Leader or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or

until noon on the second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever

occurs first.

SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader

of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority

Leader of the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall

notify the Members of the House and Senate, respectively, to
H. Con. Res. 169—2

reassemble whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall

warrant it.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED





PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of City Language Exchange Incorporated (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Jonathan White, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
      February 25, 2010
              
              /s/ Jonathan WhiteJonathan
      WhitePresident
      and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of QualMark Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles D.
Johnston, President & Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.


/s/ Charles D. Johnston
-------------------------------------
Charles D. Johnston
President & Chief Executive Officer
May 12, 2006

In connection with the Quarterly Report of QualMark Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony A. Scalese
Chief Financial Officer & Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.


/s/ Anthony A. Scalese
-------------------------------------
Anthony A. Scalese
Chief Financial Officer &
Principal Accounting Officer
May 12, 2006

A signed original of these written statements required by section 906 have been
provided to QualMark Corporation and will be retained by QualMark Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
**Exhibit 33.2**

 

**MANAGEMENT’S ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

Management of the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (or “Company”) is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Management has determined that the servicing criteria in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are applicable in regard to the servicing platform as of and for the period as follows:

 

Platform:  Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) equipment loan-backed securities issued by CNH Equipment Trust, as listed in Appendix A, for which the Company provides trustee and paying agent services (the “Platform”).

 

Applicable Servicing Criteria:  All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), to the extent required by Item 1122(d) servicing criteria in regards to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform, except for the following servicing criteria: 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(v), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with respect to the Platform (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”).  With respect to the Platform, servicing criterion 1122(d)(3)(ii) is applicable only as it relates to remittances.

 

Period:  Twelve months ended December 31, 2016 (the “Period”).

 

With respect to the Platform as of and for the Period, the Company’s management provides the following assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

 

The Company’s management is responsible for assessing the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

 

The Company’s management has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.  In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.

 

Based on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

 

KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to management’s assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.

 
|                            | **CITIBANK,   N.A.** |
|---------------------------------|----------------------|
|                            |                 |
|                            | By:                  | /s/Karen   Montbach |
|                            |                 |   |
|                            | Its:                 | Managing   Director |
|                            |                 |   |
| Dated:   February 24, 2017 |                 |   |

 

----

 

Appendix A

 

CNH Transactions and Securities Constituting the Platform

 

**DEAL NAME**
| CNH Equipment Trust   2014-C |
|------------------------------|
| CNH Equipment Trust   2015-C |
| CNH Equipment Trust   2016-A |
| CNH Equipment Trust   2016-C |

 

----
#### UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Rowland F. ZERBA, Jr. Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-2960

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: January 17, 2018

Filed: January 19, 2018

Peter E. Deegan, Jr., Ravi T. Narayan, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Iowa, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Rowland F. Zerba, Jr., Pro Se

Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, Rowland Zerba challenges the district court1 order revoking his supervised release and imposing a 7-month sentence, followed by 2 years of supervised release. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and has submitted a brief stating that Zerba believes the district court lacked authority to sentence him to additional supervised release because 18 U.S.C. § 3583(h), which specifically allows for supervised release following revocation and reinearceration, was not in effect at the time of his initial sentencing.

After careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court had authority to impose a term of supervised release following a revocation prison term. See Johnson v. United States, 529 U.S. 694, 713, 120 S.Ct. 1795, 146 L.Ed.2d 727 (2000); United States v. Palmer, 380 F.3d 395, 396-97 (8th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (standard of review). Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw, and affirm.

1

. The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


December 5, 2017


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust 355


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the series of Smart Trust set forth above (the “Trust”). We enclosed a list
of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect
our evaluation of such Securities as of close of business on December 4, 2017, in accordance with the valuation method set forth
in the Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as
the party performing the evaluations of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-220825) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an
exhibit thereto.


 


 


Very truly yours,


 


	/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO




Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President