alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.2

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2014-5 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer International Puerto Rico LLC (the Subservicer), does
hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Subservicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of November 25, 2014, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc.,
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2014-5 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the activities and performance of the Subservicer under the Servicing Agreement, dated July 15, 2016 (the Servicing Agreement), by and between Santander Consumer USA Inc. and Santander
Consumer International Puerto Rico LLC, and the related Second Amended and Restated Program Portfolio Schedule (Publicly Registered Transactions), dated as of June 28, 2017 (the Second Amended and Restated Program Portfolio Schedule, together
with the Servicing Agreement, the Subservicing Agreement), during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Subservicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement and the Subservicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the
subject of the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER INTERNATIONAL PUERTO RICO LLCBy:

/s/ Jose RamirezName:

Jose RamirezTitle:

Vice President of Servicing for Santander Consumer International Puerto Rico, LLCDate:

March 30, 2018
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ELEAZAR GUTIERREZ-CASTILLO,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D22-3777

September 1, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Frederick P. 

Mercurio, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Brett S. Chase, Special 

Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cynthia Richards, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, KHOUZAM, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
2

__________________________

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
<PAGE>






                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Citizens First Financial Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dallas
G. Smiley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.

/s/      Dallas G. Smiley
-------------------------

         Dallas G. Smiley
         Chief Financial Officer
         May 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Citizens First Financial Corp. and will be retained by Citizens
First Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John L. Ogden, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of USR Technology, Inc.
      for the year ended August 31, 2008(the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of USR Technology, Inc.                                                              

Dated: December 15, 2008

*/s/ John L. Ogden*
John L. Ogden President and Chairman(Principal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) USR
Technology, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to USR Technology,
Inc. and will be retained by USR Technology, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 220

Regarding American victims of terrorism.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 12, 1998

Mr. FOX of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. WELLER, Mr. ROTHMAN, Mr.

ENGEL, Mr. GILMAN, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr.

SALMON, Mr. FORBES, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. WEXLER, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. CHABOT, and Mr. POSHARD) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International

Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Regarding American victims of terrorism.

Whereas the traditional policy of the United States, reiterated by this Administration, has been to vigorously pursue and apprehend terrorists who have killed American

citizens in other countries;

Whereas numerous American citizens have been killed by Palestinian terrorists, most of them in Israel or the Israeli

administered territories, including 9 since the signing of

the Oslo Accords in 1993, namely Nachshon Wachsman

(New York), Alisa Flatow (New Jersey), Sara Duker

(New Jersey), Matthew Eisenfeld (Connecticut), Joan

Davenny (Connecticut), David Boim (New York), Yaron
2

•HCON 220 IH

Ungar (New York), Leah Stern (New Jersey), and Yael

Botwin (California);

Whereas 9 of the terrorists suspected in the killings of American citizens in Israel or the Israeli administered territories during 1993–1997 have been identified by Israel as

residents of Palestinian Authority-controlled territory,

namely Mohammed Dief, Nabil Sharihi, Nafez Sabih,

Imjad Hinawi, Muhi a-Din a-Sharif, Abd al-Majid Dudin,

Adel Awadallah, Ibrahim Ghneimat, and Mahmoud Abu

Hanudeh;

Whereas, according to the Israeli Government, 7 of those 9

terrorist suspects are currently believed to be free men,

and the other two are apparently in the custody of the

Palestinian Authority;

Whereas the Palestinian Authority has not honored any

Israeli requests for the transfer of four of these and at

least 30 other terrorist suspects to Israel for prosecution,

although the Oslo accords require the Palestinian Authority to honor such requests;

Whereas the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1987 permits the prosecution, in the United States, of individuals who murder

American citizens abroad; and

Whereas the United States has previously acted to bring to

justice those responsible for the deaths of American citizens and has established a precedence of United States

intervention by demanding that Libyan leader Moammar

Qadaffi transfer to the United States the Libyan terrorists suspected of bombing Pan Am flight 103: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the
3

•HCON 220 IH

1 United States should demand that Yasir Arafat and the

2 Palestinian Authority transfer to the United States, for

3 prosecution, those residents of its territory who are sus4 pected in the killings of American citizens.

Æ
# Solo Altitude Limit Always fly at appropriate altitudes for your flying location and local regulations. Solo cannot avoid obstacles on its own, so always select altitudes that avoid any obstacles, such as trees, buildings, and power lines. Solo includes a safety fence enabled by default at 150 ft. (46 m). This altitude reflects current FAA regulations to avoid potential conflicts with manned aircraft and represents a safe line

- of

- sight altitude. If Solo rea ches the altitude limit, Solo will stop ascending and limit throttle input to stay below the altitude limit.
No. 11-1404.

#### Backus et al. *v.*South Carolina et al.

Affirmed on appeal from D. C. S. C.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eduardo Robles LUZANIA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-10451

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted January 16, 2018 *

Filed January 19, 2018

Krissa Marie Lanham, DOJ-USAO, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Eduardo Robles Luzania, Pro Se

*287Before: REINHARDT, TROTT, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Eduardo Robles Luzania appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea convictions and 110-month concurrent sentences for conspiracy to distribute cocaine and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(A)(ii), (b)(l)(B)(viii), and 846, and conspiracy to launder monetary instruments, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h). Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Luzania’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Luzania the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Luzania waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. *See United States v. Watson,*582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss the appeal. *See id.*at 988.

We remand the case to the district court with instructions to correct the judgment to reflect that the concurrent term of supervised release on Count Three, a Class C felony, is three years.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED; REMANDED to correct the judgment.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Order entered November 5, 2012

004734

- In The

No. 05-11-01663-CV

MARQUIS ACQUISITION, INC., Appellant

V.

STEADFAST INSURANCE COMPANY AND JULIE FRY, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-09-04702-B

ORDER

The Court has before it appellant’s August 28, 2012 motion for extension to file its reply

brief and appellees’ August 29, 2012 response to that motion, in which appellees state that they

are unopposed. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS the brief tendered by appellant

on August 28, 2012 timely filed as of today’s date.

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 58 (Friday, March 25, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 17075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06335]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED


Procurement List; Proposed Addition

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Proposed addition to the procurement list.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing to add a product to the Procurement 
List that will be furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons who 
are blind or have other severe disabilities.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before: April 24, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, 1401 S Clark Street, Suite 715, Arlington, Virginia 22202-
4149.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information or to submit 
comments contact: Michael R. Jurkowski, Telephone: (703) 785-6404, or 
email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#81c2ccd5c4c7e4e5d3e4e6c1c0e3e8ede8f5f8ceefe4afe6eef7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8ac9c7decfccefeed8efedcacbe8e3e6e3fef3c5e4efa4ede5fc">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 
U.S.C. 8503(a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide 
interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed 
actions.

Additions

    If the Committee approves the proposed additions, the entities of 
the Federal Government identified in this notice will be required to 
procure the product(s) listed below from nonprofit agencies employing 
persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.
    The following product(s) are proposed for addition to the 
Procurement List for production by the nonprofit agencies listed:

Product(s)

NSN(s)--Product Name(s):
    MR 13155--Green Saver Crisper Insert, 2 Piece
Designated Source of Supply: CINCINNATI ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND 
AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED, Cincinnati, OH
Contracting Activity: Military Resale-Defense Commissary Agency
Distribution: C-List
Mandatory for: The requirements of military commissaries and 
exchanges in accordance with the 41 CFR 51-6.4

Michael R. Jurkowski,
Acting Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2022-06335 Filed 3-24-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
NUMBER 13

- 11

- 00 357

- CR



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

RICHARD ALVAREZ

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justi ces Garza and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Richard Alvarez , by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to

dismiss his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

.

42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss

pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having

dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be enterta ined,2

and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the

20th day of October, 2011

.
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 133

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 31, 1997

Received

SEPTEMBER 11, 1997

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the terrorist

bombing in the Jerusalem market on July 30, 1997.

Whereas on July 30, 1997, two terrorist bombs exploded almost simultaneously in the open market in Jerusalem

killing at least 13 people and wounding more than 150

others; and

Whereas this attack is a violent and vicious assault against

the peace process and against citizens of Israel: Now,

therefore, be it
2

HCON 133 RFS

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) Expresses the deep condolences of the Con4 gress and the American people to the families of the

5 victims and to the people of Israel for the loss of life

6 and the serious injuries that have been suffered in

7 the terrorist bombing in the Jerusalem market and

8 expresses the solidarity of the American people with

9 the people of Israel in the face of this tragic and

10 senseless act;

11 (2) Reaffirms the determination of the Con12 gress to join with the government of Israel in fight13 ing against international terrorism;

14 (3) Urges Yassir Arafat and officials of the Pal15 estinian Authority to undertake immediately un16 equivocal action to bring to justice leaders of terror17 ist organizations and extremist groups and to elimi18 nate all weapons and explosives in the hands of such

19 groups;

20 (4) Reaffirms the commitment of the Congress

21 of the United States to the peace process in the

22 Middle East and urges all parties to work together

23 to bring lasting peace and security without violence

24 and terrorism to that region; and
3

HCON 133 RFS

1 (5) Urges the President and appropriate Execu2 tive agencies to provide all appropriate assistance to

3 the government of Israel to provide medical and

4 other assistance to the victims of this terrorist act,

5 to bring to justice the terrorist leaders behind this

6 and similar acts of violence, and to work to prevent

7 such terrorist acts in the future.

Passed the House of Representatives July 30, 1997.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
| (logo) WELLS            FARGO | Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-010 9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045

 

Tel:  410 884 2000

Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation 

60 Wall Street 

New York, New York 10005 

 

 

RE:   Annual Statement of Compliance for COMM 2014-LC17 Mortgage Trust 

Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates 

 

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the "Reporting Period"): 

 

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and 

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

 

 

 

February 24, 2015 

 

 

 
| /s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President | /s/ Dave Ward

Dave Ward

Senior Vice President |
|----------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

232/15 

KA 11-01614 

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JAMELL R. MCCULLOUGH, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

EASTON THOMPSON KASPEREK SHIFFRIN LLP, ROCHESTER (BRIAN SHIFFRIN OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (NANCY GILLIGAN OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County

(Joseph D. Valentino, J.), rendered November 3, 2010. The judgment

convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of murder in the second

degree, robbery in the first degree and attempted robbery in the first

degree. The judgment was reversed by order of this Court entered

March 27, 2015 in a memorandum decision (126 AD3d 1452), and the

People on May 21, 2015 were granted leave to appeal to the Court of

Appeals from the order of this Court (25 NY3d 1079), and the Court of

Appeals on June 28, 2016 reversed the order and remitted the case to

this Court for consideration of the facts and issues raised but not

determined on the appeal to this Court (___ NY3d ___ [June 28, 2016]). 

Now, upon remittitur from the Court of Appeals and having

considered the issues raised but not determined on the appeal to this

Court,

It is hereby ORDERED that, upon remittitur from the Court of

Appeals, the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: This case is before us upon remittitur from the

Court of Appeals (People v McCullough, ___ NY3d ___, ___ [June 28,

2016], revg 126 AD3d 1452). We previously reversed the judgment

convicting defendant upon a jury verdict of, inter alia, murder in the

second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [3]) and robbery in the first degree 

(§ 160.15 [4]), holding that Supreme Court abused its discretion in

precluding defendant from presenting expert testimony on the

reliability of eyewitness identifications. The Court of Appeals

reversed our order and held that the trial court did not abuse its

discretion as a matter of law when it precluded the introduction of

such expert testimony, and the Court remitted the matter to us for

consideration of the facts and issues raised but not determined on the

appeal (McCullough, ___ NY3d at ___). We now affirm.
-2- 232/15 

KA 11-01614 

Defendant failed to preserve for our review his remaining

contention that the trial court’s ruling concerning the expert

testimony in question violated his constitutional rights (see People v

Lane, 7 NY3d 888, 889; People v Chisolm, 57 AD3d 223, 224, lv denied

12 NY3d 782), and we decline to exercise our power to address that

contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see

CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). 

Entered: July 8, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court