alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.1





**STATEMENT
      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





The
      undersigned, Andrew Gordon, is the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
      Financial Officer of Coffee Holding Co., Inc.  (the
      “Company”).




This
      statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of
      the
      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2007
      (the “Report”).




By
      execution of this statement, I certify that:




A)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
                78o(d)) and




B)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company
                as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
                Report.




This
      statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that
      this
      statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that
      this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934, as amended .





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Coffee Holding Co., Inc. and will be retained by Coffee Holding Co., Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.




March
              16,
              2007
            
            
            /s/ Andrew
              GordonDated
            
            
            Andrew
              Gordon
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

FATHER THOMAS EUTENEU E R,

Appellant,

v.

THE CATHOLIC MUTUAL RELIEF SOCIETY OF AMERICA,

THE DIOCESE OF PALM BEACH, INC., and ANNE LOTIERZO,

Appellees.

No. 4D22

- 2481

[ March 23, 2023 ]

Appeal of nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth

Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Gary Sweet, Judge; L.T. Case No.

432021CA001106.

Jeanette M. Lugo of Wiederhold & Kummerlen, P.A., West Palm Beach,

for appellant.

Sharon C. Degnan of Kubicki, Draper, Orlando, for appellee The

Catholic Mutual Relief Society of America.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN , G ERBER and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                     EXHIBIT 11

                                   GATEWAY BANCSHARES, INC.
                   CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                         (unaudited)


The following tabulation presents the calculation of basic and diluted earnings
per common share for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2002 and
2001.


                                                      Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended
                                                     --------------------  --------------------
                                                     June 30,   June 30,   June 30,   June 30,
                                                       2002       2001       2001       2001
                                                     ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
<S>                                                  <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Basic net income                                     $ 324,279  $ 176,637  $ 633,186  $ 340,451
                                                     =========  =========  =========  =========

Basic earnings on common shares                      $ 324,279  $ 176,637  $ 633,186  $ 340,451
                                                     =========  =========  =========  =========

Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic      681,758    679,048    681,668    679,048
                                                     =========  =========  =========  =========

Basic earnings per common share                      $    0.48  $    0.26  $    0.93  $    0.50
                                                     =========  =========  =========  =========

Basic net income per common share                    $    0.48  $    0.26  $    0.93  $    0.50
                                                     =========  =========  =========  =========

Diluted net income                                   $ 324,279  $ 176,637  $ 633,186  $ 340,451
                                                     =========  =========  =========  =========

Diluted earnings on common shares                    $ 324,279  $ 176,637  $ 633,186  $ 340,451
                                                     =========  =========  =========  =========

Weighted average common shares outstanding, diluted    689,660    681,842    689,886    682,006
                                                     =========  =========  =========  =========

Diluted earnings per common share                    $    0.47  $    0.26  $    0.92  $    0.50
                                                     =========  =========  =========  =========

Diluted net income per common share                  $    0.47  $    0.26  $    0.92  $    0.50
                                                     =========  =========  =========  =========
</TABLE>


<PAGE>
#### Lee Kent HEMPFLING; Suesie Kent Hempfling, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Kent VOLKMER *; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-16329

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017 **

Filed December 26, 2017

*401Lee Kent Hempfling, Pro Se

Suesie Kent Hempfling, Pro Se

Kevin S. Costello, Esquire, Deputy County Attorney, County Attoreney’s Office, Florence, AZ, for Defendant-Appellee Kent Volkmer

Pamela Linnins, Esquire, Assistant Attorney General, Arizona Attorney General’s Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendants-Appellees Boyd T. Johnson, Mark Bmo-vich

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 Kent Volkmer has been substituted for his predecessor, M. 'Lando Voyles, as Pinal County Attorney under Fed. R. App, P. 43(c)(2).

**

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ****

Lee Kent Hempfling and Suesie Kent Hempfling appeal pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging due process violations in connection with prior state court proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, We review de novo a dismissal under the *Rooker-Feldman*doctrine. *Noel v. Hall,*341 F.3d 1148, 1154 (9th Cir. 2003). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the Hempflings’ action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under the *Rooker-Feld-man*doctrine because it constituted a prohibited “de facto appeal” of a prior state court judgment and raised a claim that was “inextricably intertwined” with that state court judgment. *See id.*at 1163-65 (discussing proper ¿pplication of the *Rooker-Feldman*doctrine); *see also Bianchi v. Rylaarsdam,*334 F.3d 895 (9th Cir. 2003) *(Rooker-Feldman*precludes adjudication where “the only redress [plaintiffs] seek is an ‘undoing* of the prior state-court judgment.” (internal quotation marks omitted)).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the Hempflings’ motion for reconsideration because the Hemp-flings failed to state any grounds warranting relief. *See Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc.,*5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir. 1993) (setting forth standard of review and grounds for relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60).

We do not consider issues raised by the Hempflings in their brief that are not supported by argument. *See Acosta-Huerta v. Estelle,*7 F.3d 139, 144 (9th Cir. 1992).

AFFIRMED.

****

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-1245

JAMES ADEYEMI,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

George L. Russell, III, Chief District Judge. (1:21-cv-02488-GLR)

Submitted: July 30, 2024 Decided: August 1, 2024

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Adeyemi, Appellant Pro Se. Gilda Bethany Ingle, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, 

Tysons Corner, Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1245 Doc: 9 Filed: 08/01/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

James Adeyemi appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to change 

venue and accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing with 

prejudice Adeyemi’s action as a sanction for his continuing failure to comply with 

discovery orders. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm the district court’s orders. Adeyemi v. Amazon.com Servs., LLC, No. 1:21-cv02488-GLR (D. Md. Dec. 18, 2023; Mar. 14, 2024). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1245 Doc: 9 Filed: 08/01/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6961

RAFAEL ROMERO,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District 

Judge. (1:13-cv-00036-JFM)

Submitted: December 11, 2015 Decided: January 19, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rafael Romero, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Rafael Romero seeks to appeal the district court’s decision 

to return his motion for miscellaneous relief without docketing 

it because the motion pertained to the filing fee in a case that 

was closed in 2013. This court may exercise jurisdiction only 

over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain 

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012). 

The decision Romero seeks to appeal is not an appealable 

judgment or order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack 

of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

 

Thecertification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and ExchangeCommission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63of Title 18 of the United States Code.

 

May 9, 2003

 

Bruce N. Warner, theChief Financial Officer of Northern California Bancorp, Inc. certifies:

 

3.               thatthis periodic report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

4.               thatinformation contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of NorthernCalifornia Bancorp, Inc..

 

 
|   | /s/ Bruce N.  Warner               |   |   |
|--------|------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   | Bruce N.  Warner                   |   |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer and       |   |
|   |  Principal Accounting Officer |   |

 

----
#### Frederick Lee JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Felecia HODGE, Library Technical Assistant, in her official and individual capacity; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-55997

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted January 16, 2018 *

Filed January 19, 2018

Frederick Lee Jackson, Pro Se

Before: REINHARDT, TROTT, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed, R. App. P. 34(a)(2),

*299MEMORANDUM **

Frederick Lee Jackson, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Nordstrom v. Ryan,*762 F.3d 903, 908 (9th Cir. 2014) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A); *Watison v. Carter,*668 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir. 2012) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Jackson’s access-to-courts claim because Jackson failed to allege facts sufficient to show that the prison’s photocopying policy caused an actual injury. *See Hebbe v. Pliler,*627 F.3d 338, 342-43 (9th Cir. 2010) (an access-to-courts claim requires an actual injury).

The district court properly dismissed Jackson’s failure-to-protect claim because Jackson failed to allege facts sufficient to show that the prison’s photocopying policy posed a substantial risk of serious harm that defendants knew of and disregarded. *See Lemire v. Cal. Dep’t of Corrs. & Rehab.,*726 F.3d 1062, 1074 (9th Cir. 2013) (elements of a failure-to-protect claim).

The district court properly dismissed Jackson’s supervisory liability claim because Jackson failed to allege facts sufficient to show that defendants Hightshoe, Covello, Briggs, and Hatton were personally involved in a constitutional deprivation. *See Starr v. Baca,*652 F.3d 1202, 1207-08 (9th Cir. 2011) (discussing supervisory liability under § 1983); *see also Peralta v. Dillard,*744 F.3d 1076, 1085 (9th Cir. 2014) (no vicarious liability for supervisors under § 1983).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
# Official Journal C 85/7 Ma

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 85 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 667 March 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 85

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 667 March 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2023/C 85/01 | List of competent authorities which are authorised to search directly the data contained in the Schengen Information System pursuant to Article 41(8) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1861 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of border checks and Article 56(7) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 of the European Parliament and the Council on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters | 1 |
| 2023/C 85/02 | List of N.SIS Offices and the national SIRENE Bureaux | 299 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2023/C 85/01

List of competent authorities which are authorised to search directly the data contained in the Schengen Information System pursuant to Article 41(8) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1861 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of border checks and Article 56(7) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 of the European Parliament and the Council on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters

1

2023/C 85/02

List of N.SIS Offices and the national SIRENE Bureaux

299

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
I)ISMISS; Opinion tiled October 10, 2012

In The Q.tnirt 

## uf pn1a1i fiftIi IhitricI 

## uf !ixa it 

## E1at1n No. 05-10-01610-CV EARTH ENERGY UTILiTY CORPORATION, Appellant V. ENVIRONMENTALLY ENGINEERED EQUIPMENT, INC. AND DOYLE A. REVIS, Appellees On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-09-08147 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before ChiefJustice Wright and Justices Francis and Lang-Miers opinion By ChiefJustice Wright On June 4. 2012. the Court granted the agreed motion to withdraw filed by counsel for appellant. We instructedappellantto notifythis Court ofthe name, State BarNumber, address, and telephonenumberofnewcounsel. ByorderdatedJune 28.2012. the Courtgrantedappellantafortyfive da extension oftime to provide this Courtwith the information regarding new counsel. In that order, the Court cautioned appellant that failure to provide the information regarding new counsel within the time specified would result in dismissal ofthe appeal. As oftoday’s date, appellant has not provided the requested information. A corporation may only appear in this Courtthrough counsel. 

### See KunstoplastofAm., Inc.v. f’ortnosa Plastics Corp., 937 S.w2d 455, 456 (Tex. 1996) (per curiam). Appellant has failed to notify the Court that it has retained counsel. For this reason, we dismiss the appeal. S’e Ttx. R.
j\ip P 4 3(c)

-r CAROL
‘ WRICil-U CHIEI/4US1 fCf 10161 OF.P05

## Qiiiirt ufpt’ra1 ifti! Iitrirt uf xzu at 1alla JUDGMENT P A R T II F N H R G Y U T I F I T Y Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 CORPORATION. Appellant of Dallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. CC-09- 08147). No. 05-10-01 61 0-CV V. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright, Justices Francis and Lang-Miers. ENVIRONMENTALLY ENGINEERED participating. EQUIPMENT, INC. ANI) DOYLE A. REVIS, Appellees Based on the Courts opinion ofthis date. the appeal is DISMISSED. Itis ORDERED that appellees. Environmentally Engineered Equipment. Inc. and DoyleA. Revis, recover their costs ofthe appeal from appellant, Earth Energy Utility Corporation. Judgment entered October 10, 2012.

CAROL’tN WRIGI 7 IT Cl lIEJflCI/
| (logo) WELLS 

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 **ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreementdated as of December 1, 2014, by and among RBS COMMERCIAL FUNDING INC., asDepositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer,CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as Special Servicer, TRIMONT REAL ESTATEADVISORS, INC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asCertificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, andWILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C25 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton,Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.      A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during theperiod from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”),and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made undermy supervision, and

 

2.      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the MasterServicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in allmaterial respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MASSILLON LHERISSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-1460

[November 2, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; John S. Kastrenakes, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

2010CF002071BXX.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, West Palm Beach and Dan 

Hallenberg, Special Assistant Regional Counsel, Fort Lauderdale, Office of 

Criminal Conflict And Civil Regional Counsel, Fourth District, for 

appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. 

Melear, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 177 (Friday, September 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 54775]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-21800]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Twenty-Seventh Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport 
Security Access Control Systems

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport Security 
Access Control Systems.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
twenty-seventh meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport 
Security Access Control Systems.

DATES: The meeting will be held on September 23rd, 2014 from 10:00 
a.m.-2:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 224. The agenda will 
include the following:

September 23rd, 2014

 Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks
 Report from the TSA
 Report on Safe Skies Document Distribution
 Individual Document Section Reports
 Action Items for Next Meeting
 Time and Place of Next Meeting
 Any Other Business
 Adjourn

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 8th 2014.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management Analyst, NextGen, Business Operations Group, Federal 
Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-21800 Filed 9-11-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```