alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 147

Expressing the sense of Congress that a postage stamp should be issued

commemorating Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 5, 1997

Mr. ALLEN submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that a postage stamp

should be issued commemorating Joshua Lawrence

Chamberlain.

Whereas Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain, born in 1828 in

Brewer, Maine, was an outstanding soldier, educator,

statesman, and author during his long and distinguished

career;

Whereas Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain was the living embodiment of Maine character, grit, and courage;

Whereas Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain, as Colonel of the

10th Maine Volunteer Infantry Regiment, contributed

greatly to the Union victory at Gettysburg by his heroic

defense of Little Round Top on July 2, 1863;
2

•HCON 147 IH

Whereas Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain, as Major General of

the Third Brigade, Fifth Corps, Army of the Potomac,

was selected by Lieutenant General Ulysses S. Grant to

preside over the formal surrender of the Army of Northern Virginia on April 12, 1865, and rendered a salute to

the defeated adversary that symbolized hope for the reconciliation of North and South;

Whereas Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain, as commander of

the militia, displayed great statesmanship in averting civil

conflict without resort to arms during the 1880 election

crisis in Maine;

Whereas Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain was a progressive

educator who inaugurated a ‘‘new Elizabethan age’’ of

learning as president of Bowdoin College, represented

Maine at the 1876 Philadelphia Centennial, represented

the United States at the Paris Exposition on education,

and wrote the classic ‘‘The Passing of the Armies’’; and

Whereas Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain is a historical figure

of national significance: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—

3 (1) a postage stamp should be issued to com4 memorate Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain; and

5 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee of

6 the United States Postal Service should recommend

7 to the Postmaster General that such a postage

8 stamp should be issued.

Æ
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  Renaissance Home Equity Loan Trust 2006-4

  I, Scott Runkles, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A, and all reports on
     Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by
     this report on Form 10-K/A Renaissance Home Equity Loan Trust 2006-4
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
     servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review
     conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in
     this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
     in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its
     obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18
     and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as
     otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of
     noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this
     report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Ocwen
     Loan Servicing, LLC.

     Dated:  June 5, 2008

     /s/ Scott Runkles
     Scott Runkles, Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master servicer)
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Celerity Systems, Inc. (the
“ Company ”)
      onAmendment No. 2 toForm 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005
      as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the “ Report ”),
      the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:December 21,
                2005
            **CELERITY
                SYSTEMS, INC.**By:/s/
                C. Thomas McMillenC.
                Thomas McMillenPresident,
                Chief Executive Officer, and Interim Chief
              Financial
                Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Celerity Systems, Inc. and will be retained
      by Celerity Systems, Inc. and furnished to the United States Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.
#### Labarrie Dekedric WATSON, Petitioner-Appellant v. Jerry GOODWIN, Warden, David Wade Correctional Center, Respondent-Appellee

No. 17-30208 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed January 24, 2018

Labarrie Dekedric Watson, Pro Se

Rebecca Edwards, Assistant District Attorney, District Attorney’s Office for the 1st JDC — Parish of Caddo, Shreveport, LA, for Respondent-Appellee

Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Labarrie Dekedric Watson, Louisiana prisoner # 436988, is appealing the district *312court’s denial of his motion for bail pending review by the district court of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas proceeding. Watson’s motion for a certificate of appealability is unnecessary because there has not been a final order in his habeas case by the district court. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1); *Harbison v. Bell,*556 U.S. 180, 183, 129 S.Ct. 1481, 173 L.Ed.2d 347 (2009).

In order to obtain bail pending review of a habeas petition, Watson must show that he is raising substantial constitutional claims that have a high probability of success, and also that “extraordinary or exceptional circumstances exist which make the grant of bail necessary to make the habeas remedy effective.” *Calley v. Callaway,*496 F.2d 701, 702 (5th Cir. 1974).

Watson argues in his brief that his counsel was ineffective in failing to respond to errors during his trial and that there is a high probability that he will succeed on his ineffective assistance of counsel claims. Watson provides no explanation regarding the specific errors made by counsel or how the alleged errors affected the outcome of his case. Nor does he provide any citations to the relevant parts of the record that supported his claims. Watson has abandoned on appeal his claim that he is raising substantial constitutional claims of ineffective assistance of counsel that have a high probability of success. *See Grant v. Cuellar,*59 F.3d 523, 524-25 (5th Cir. 1995); *Yohey v. Collins,*985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993); Fed. R. App. P. 28. Watson’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel first made in his reply brief will not be considered. *See United States v. Jimenez,*509 F.3d 682, 693 n.10 (5th Cir. 2007). Because Watson fails to show that he is raising substantial constitutional claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, the court need not consider whether Watson has demonstrated extraordinary or exceptional circumstances that warrant the grant of bail. *See Calley,*496 F.2d at 702.

The district court’s denial of Watson’s motion for bail is AFFIRMED. Watson’s motion to file a supplemental attachment to his brief is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir, R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICING COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2014-5 for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2014 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of November 25, 2014, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2014-5 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC./s/ Jason KulasName:

Jason KulasTitle:

President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 23, 2015/s/ Jennifer M. PoppName:

Jennifer M. PoppTitle:

Chief Accounting OfficerDate:

March 23, 2015
No. 11-9302.

#### Richardson *v.*Varano, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Coal Township, et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of *Martinez*v. *Ryan,*566 U. S. 1 (2012).
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 10

- 00237

- CV

ADRIAN PEGUES, INDIV IDUALLY
AND AS REPRESENTATIV E OF
THE ESTATE OF IDA PE GUES, DECEASED, AND ON BEH ALF OF JESSICA PORTER, VIRG INIA MANUAL, CAROLYN HOLL AND, RODERICK PEGUES, VIC TOR PEGUES, VALERIE ELDE R, AND
ANY OTHER WRONGFUL D EATH
BENEFICIARIES APPELLANT

V.

VIRENDRA K. AGARWAL, M.D.
AND VIRENDRA KUMAR AGARWAL, M.D., P.A. APPELLEES

------------

FROM THE 235TH DISTRICT COURT OF COOKE COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPIN ION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

------------

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

We have consi dered “ Appellants' Motion For Voluntary Dismissal O f

Appeal (Unopposed) .” It is the court = s opinion that the motion should be granted;

therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DELIVERED: February 17 , 2011
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in 5THCIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-11341

Summary Calendar

In the Matter of: LARRY CLIFTON BROOKS,

 Debtor.

LARRY CLIFTON BROOKS,

Appellant,

versus

MOSELEY & STANDERFER PC,

Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

1:99-CV-161

May 3, 2000

Before POLITZ, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

LarryCliftonBrooks appeals an adverse judgment affirming the action ofthe

Bankruptcy Court on his claim of a homestead exemption on 137 acres of real

property in Irion County, Texas. Our review of the record, briefs of the parties, and

applicable law persuades that there has been no error in the rulings of the courts à

quo. Accordingly, on the basis of the facts as found, authorities cited, and analysis

made by the District Court in its careful and scholarly Order herein, signed and

filed on October 20, 1999, the judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.
NO. 12-09-00220-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

LAKESHA BLOUNT, § APPEAL FROM THE 188TH

APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE § GREGG COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant attempts to appeal the

revocation of her deferred adjudication community supervision. Sentence was imposed on June 5,

2009.

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.2 provides that an appeal is perfected when notice of

appeal isfiled within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court unless

a motion for new trial is timely filed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). Where a timely motion for new

trial has been filed, notice of appeal shall be filed within ninety days after the sentence is imposed

or suspended in open court. TEX.R.APP.P. 26.2(a)(2). Appellant did not file a motion for new trial.

Therefore, Appellant’s notice of appeal was due to have been filed on or before July 6, 2009.

However, Appellant did not file her notice of appeal until July 8, 2009 and did not file a motion for

extension of time to file her notice of appeal as permitted by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure

26.3. See TEX.R.APP. P. 26.3 (appellate court may extend time for filing notice of appeal if, within

fifteen days after deadline for filing notice of appeal, appellant files notice of appeal in trial court

and motion complying with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.5(b) in appellate court).

On July 15, 2009, this court notified Appellant that her notice of appeal was untimely and
2

that there was no timely motion for an extension of time to file the notice of appeal as permitted by

rule 26.3. Appellant was further informed that the appeal would be dismissed unless, on or before

July 27, 2009, the information filed in this appeal was amended to show the jurisdiction of this court.

The deadline imposed in ourJuly 15, 2009 notice has now passed, and Appellant has neither shown

the jurisdiction of this court or otherwise responded to the notice.

Because this court has no authority to allow the late filing of a notice of appeal except as

provided by rule 26.3, the appeal must be dismissed. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Accordingly, the

appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Opinion delivered July 31, 2009.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 RE: Annual Statement ofCompliance for COMM 2014-CCRE20 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates

 

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of October 1, 2014 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

/s/ Jeffrey Coletta

Jeffrey Coletta

Assistant Secretary

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001006762
<NAME> ARCA CORP.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          55,609
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  123,263
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               282,861
<PP&E>                                       3,607,894
<DEPRECIATION>                                 308,661
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,666,338
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          232,202
<BONDS>                                      3,531,974
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           247
<OTHER-SE>                                   (122,959)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,666,338
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               204,289
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  160,084
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (673)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              76,184
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (31,306)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (31,306)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (31,306)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.032)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.032)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 23, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 16556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06114]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Toll-Free Phone 
Lines Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Toll-Free 
Phone Lines Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. Due to 
unavoidable delays in this year's approval process, we will not be able 
to meet the 15-calendar notice threshold, but this meeting will still 
be open. This meeting will still be held via teleconference.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, March 31, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rosalind Matherne at 1-888-912-1227 or 
202-317-4115.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Phone 
Lines Project Committee will be held Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 11:00 
a.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or 
submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and 
structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be 
made with Rosalind Matherne. For more information please contact 
Rosalind Matherne at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4115, or write TAP 
Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or 
contact us at the website: http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda will 
include various IRS issues.

    Dated: March 17, 2022.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2022-06114 Filed 3-22-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (the Authority), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge,
on the date hereof:



| | (a) | this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Authority for the three months ended March 31, 2011 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Authority.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/    MITCHELL GROSSINGER
ETESSMitchell Grossinger EtessChief Executive Officer,Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMay 16, 2011


A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Authority and will be retained by the Authority and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.