alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 95-KP-00011-SCT JOSEPH YORK

v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED, PURSUANT TO M.R.A.P. 35-A DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/07/94 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. EUGENE BOGEN COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: WASHINGTON CO. CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: PRO SE ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
BY: BILLY GORE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FRANK CARLTON NATURE OF THE CASE: CRIMINAL - POST CONVICTION RELIEF DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED - 4/3/97 MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED: MANDATE ISSUED:

BEFORE PRATHER, P.J., ROBERTS AND MILLS, JJ.
PRATHER, PRESIDING JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT:

This case arises from the denial of post-conviction relief to Joseph York, who had previously pled guilty to the sale of cocaine. York alleges that he did not receive a speedy trial because of the delay from his commission of the crime until his indictment. However, the record reflects that York was indicted well within the two-year period of limitations prescribed by statute; therefore, York's argument on this point is without merit. See Miss. Code Ann. § 99-1-5 (Supp. 1996). York also contends that his indictment was fatally insufficient. He alleges that the indictment did not comply with Mississippi Uniform Criminal Rule of Circuit Court Practice 2.05 and that the indictment did not comply with Article 6, § 169 of the Mississippi Constitution, which requires that the indictment "conclude against the peace and dignity of the state." The record reflects that the indictment does contain that phrase, followed by "A TRUE BILL," the signatures of the State'sAttorney and the Grand Jury Foreman, the filing and recording information, and the signature of the

Circuit Clerk. York does not argue that the indictment fails to contain this phrase, rather he argues that the indictment fails to "conclude" with the phrase "against the peace and dignity of the State." By failing to raise the sufficiency of the indictment at the trial level and failing to demur from the indictment as required by statute, and by entry of his guilty plea, York has waived these objections to the sufficiency of the indictment. Brandau v. State , 662 So. 2d 1051, 1053-54 (Miss. 1995); Conerly v. State , 607 So. 2d 1153, 1156 (Miss. 1992); Brooks v. State , 573 So. 2d 1350, 1352 (Miss. 1990); Miss. Code Ann. § 99-39-21 (Supp. 1996); Miss. Code Ann. § 99-7-21 (Supp. 1996). Therefore, the denial of York's motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed, per curiam

. DENIAL OF POST-CONVICTION RELIEF AFFIRMED. LEE, C.J., SULLIVAN, P.J., PITTMAN, BANKS, McRAE, ROBERTS, SMITH AND MILLS, JJ., CONCUR.
j ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

PR 07-0011 

IN THE MATTER OF CALLING A RETIRED 

DISTRICT JUDGE TO ACTIVE SERVICE ORDER 

Honorable Elizabeth A. Best, Judge of the District Court for the Eighth Judicial 

District of the State of Montana, has requested the assistance of retired District Judge James 

A. Manley to assume jurisdiction of Eighth Judicial District Court Cause No. DC-2024-6, 

State v. Ryerson. 

Judge Manley has retired under the provisions of the Montana Judges' Retirement 

System and, being subject to call for duty pursuant to § 19-5-103(a) and (b), MCA, has 

advised that he is agreeable to assisting the Eighth Judicial District Court with the 

above-listed matter. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. Honorable James A. Manley, retired District Judge, is hereby called to active 

service in the District Court of the Eighth Judicial District of the State of Montana, to 

assume judicial authority of Cause No. DC-2024-6, State v. Ryerson, and is hereby 

authorized to proceed with any and all necessary hearings, opinions, and orders, including 

final resolution of said matter. 

2. For all active service, Judge Manley shall be paid the salaiy compensation to 

which he is entitled by § 19-5-103(2)(b), MCA, and actual expenses, if any, shall be 

reimbursed. 

3. A copy of this Order shall be filed with the Clerk of Court for Cascade County, 

with the request that this Order be sent to all counsel of record in the above-listed matter. 

FILED 

AUG 2 6 2024 

Bowen Greenwood 

Clerk of Supreme Court 

State of Montana 

08/26/2024

Case Number: PR 07-0011
4. A copy of this Order shall also be furnished to Honorable Elizabeth A. Best, 

Honorable Matthew J. Cuffe, Honorable James A. Manley, and to Cathy Pennie, Office of 

the Supreme Court Administrator. 

The ChiefJustice enters this Order pursuant to Article VII, Section 6(3) of the 1972 

Montana Constitution, and statutes enacted in conformity therewith and in implementation 

thereof. 

Y\'' DATED this -C__ 6 day of August, 2024. 

,,,: ,„\?,

Chief Justice 

2
No. 11-1207.

#### SimmsParris *v.*Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Sup. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 138

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To correct technical errors in the enrollment of the

bill H.R. 2014.
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 138

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R.

3 2014), to provide for reconciliation pursuant to sub4 sections (b)(2) and (d) of section 105 of the concurrent

5 resolution on the budget for fiscal year 1998, the Clerk
2

•HCON 138 EH

1 of the House of Representatives shall make the following

2 corrections:

3 (1) In the amendment proposed to be added by

4 section 1085(c), strike ‘‘section 407(d)’’ and insert

5 ‘‘paragraph (4) or (7) of section 407(d)’’.

6 (2) Strike subparagraph (B) of section

7 1031(e)(2) and insert the following:

8 ‘‘(B) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS PAID FOR

9 TICKETS PURCHASED BEFORE OCTOBER 1,

10 1997.—The amendments made by subsection

11 (c) shall not apply to amounts paid before Octo12 ber 1, 1997; except that—

13 ‘‘(i) the amendment made to section

14 4261(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of

15 1986 shall apply to amounts paid more

16 than 7 days after the date of the enact17 ment of this Act for transportation begin18 ning on or after October 1, 1997, and

19 ‘‘(ii) the amendment made to section

20 4263(c) of such Code shall apply to the ex21 tent related to taxes imposed under the
3

•HCON 138 EH

1 amendment made to such section 4261(c)

2 on the amounts described in clause (i).’’.

Passed the House of Representatives July 31, 1997.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 945 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  1st Session
                                 S. 945

To amend the Illinois and Michigan Canal Heritage Corridor Act of 1984 
   to modify the boundaries of the corridor, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 20 (legislative day, June 19), 1995

Mr. Simon (for himself and Ms. Moseley-Braun) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Illinois and Michigan Canal Heritage Corridor Act of 1984 
   to modify the boundaries of the corridor, and for other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CORRIDOR BOUNDARIES.

    Section 104(b)(1) of the Illinois and Michigan Canal National 
Heritage Corridor Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-398; 16 U.S.C. 461 note) 
is amended by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following:
            ``(1) In general.--The corridor shall consist of the Joliet 
        Army Ammunition Plant in the State of Illinois and the areas 
        depicted on--
                    ``(A) the map entitled `Illinois and Michigan Canal 
                National Heritage Corridor', dated May 1983 and 
                numbered IMC-80,000;
                    ``(B) the map entitled `Illinois and Michigan Canal 
                National Heritage Corridor--Boundary Definition for 
                portions of the Corridor East of Harlem Avenue', dated 
                ____________ and numbered ____________; and
                    ``(C) the map entitled `Illinois and Michigan Canal 
                National Heritage Corridor--Boundary Definition for the 
                Lake Renwick Zone', dated ____________ and numbered 
                ____________,
        each of which maps shall be on file and available for public 
        inspection in the offices of the Commission and in the offices 
        of the National Park Service.''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF DURATION OF COMMISSION.

    Section 111(a) of the Illinois and Michigan Canal National Heritage 
Corridor Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-398; 16 U.S.C. 461 note) is amended 
by striking ``ten'' and inserting ``20''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operation of the Company.
 HOMELAND SECURITY CAPITAL CORPORATIONFebruary 14, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Michael T. BriganteName:
    Michael T. BriganteTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals
**San Antonio, Texas**

June 3, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00215

- CV

METHODIST HEALTHCARE SYSTEM OF SAN ANTONIO , Ltd., L.L.P. d/b/a Methodist Children’s Hospital of South Texas, Robert Gonzalez, and Rodney Sheffield, Appellant s

v.

Emily BELDEN

, Appellee

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012

- CI

- 181 64 Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

In this accelerated appeal , Ap pellant s ’ brief s are due to be filed with this court on June 4,
2014. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a). On May 30, 2014

, A ppellant s filed a joint first motion for
extension of time to file the ir brief s until June 18, 2014

. Appellant s ’ joint motion is GRANTED. Appellant s must file their brief s with this court by J une 18, 2014.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hav e hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 3rd day of June, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 28, 2011

p0620 

# Order

June 28, 2011

142578

RUTH FUNDERBURK, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 142578 COA: 294022 Kent CC: 09-001281-CH FIFTH THIRD BANCORP, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 28, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Corey
Henry, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2014-5
(the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based
on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in
all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and
their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I
have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.



By:

/s/ Corey HenryName:

Corey HenryTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerSantander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor(senior officer in charge of securitization ofthe depositor)Date:

March 29, 2019
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 59 (Monday, March 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 17291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06468]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than April 27, 2022.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (William Spaniel, Senior 
Vice President) 100 North 6th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105-
1521. Comments can also be sent electronically to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2f6c4042424a415b5c014e5f5f43464c4e5b4640415c6f5f47464301495d4d01405d48"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="296a4644444c475d5a0748595945404a485d4046475a6959414045074f5b4b07465b4e">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. The Toronto-Dominion Bank, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and its 
subsidiary bank holding companies, TD Group US Holdings, LLC, 
Wilmington, Delaware, and TD Bank US Holding Company, Cherry Hill, New 
Jersey; to acquire First Horizon Corporation, and thereby indirectly 
acquire First Horizon Bank, both of Memphis, Tennessee.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 23, 
2022.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-06468 Filed 3-25-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Official Journal C 284/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 284 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5027 November 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 284

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5027 November 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 284/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4870 — EDF EN/Alcofinance/Alcogroup JV) (1) | 1 |
| 2007/C 284/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4842 — Danone/Numico) (1) | 1 |
| 2007/C 284/03 | State aids — Decisions to propose appropriate measures pursuant to Article 88(1) of the EC Treaty where the Member State concerned has accepted those measures (1) | 2 |
| 2007/C 284/04 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2007/C 284/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4870 — EDF EN/Alcofinance/Alcogroup JV) (1)

1

2007/C 284/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4842 — Danone/Numico) (1)

1

2007/C 284/03

State aids — Decisions to propose appropriate measures pursuant to Article 88(1) of the EC Treaty where the Member State concerned has accepted those measures (1)

2

2007/C 284/04

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

3

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 284/05 | Euro exchange rates | 6 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2007/C 284/05

Euro exchange rates

6

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 284/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4977 — AgipFuel/Campetroli) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 7 |
| 2007/C 284/07 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4971 — MPC/Viga-Villacero/MAN/Coutinho & Ferrostaal (JV)) (1) | 8 |
| 2007/C 284/08 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4956 — STX/Aker) (1) | 9 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

Commission

2007/C 284/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4977 — AgipFuel/Campetroli) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

7

2007/C 284/07

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4971 — MPC/Viga-Villacero/MAN/Coutinho & Ferrostaal (JV)) (1)

8

2007/C 284/08

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4956 — STX/Aker) (1)

9

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 32(a)

                                 Certification

           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
        (Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
                              United States Code)

In connection with the Report of Long Island Physician Holdings Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Paul Kolker, President and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Paul Kolker
--------------------------------
Paul Kolker,
President, Chairman of the Board
February 4, 2004


This certification accompanies the above-described Report on Form 10-Q pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001006591
<NAME> WHITE PINE SOFTWARE, INC.
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-03-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      13,068,409
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,957,733
<ALLOWANCES>                                   129,431
<INVENTORY>                                     83,809
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,180,222
<PP&E>                                       3,978,341
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,446,602
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,100,206
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,255,727
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        93,090
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,100,206
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,005,479
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  412,812
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,677,786
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,648
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 654
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,904,932)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,306
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,910,238)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.21)
        

</TABLE>