alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          22,229
<SECURITIES>                                    65,716
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,764<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                      1,994
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,643
<PP&E>                                         354,847
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,555
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 478,802
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,897
<BONDS>                                        297,769
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     100,320
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   478,802
<SALES>                                          8,041<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               246,818
<CGS>                                            8,581
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  141,110
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,839
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 38,040
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             38,040
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  5,243
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    32,797
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Notes and accounts receivable-trade are reported net of allowances for
doubtfull accounts.
<F2>Net sales are reported net of promotional allowances applicable to tangible
items.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# L_2005177DE.01004202.xml

| 9.7.2005 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 177/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2005

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 177/42

---

Berichtigung der Entscheidung 2004/336/EG der Kommission vom 31. März 2004 zur Genehmigung des Inverkehrbringens von gelben Streichfetten, Fruchtgetränken auf Milchbasis, joghurtartigen Erzeugnissen und käseartigen Erzeugnissen mit Phytosterin-/Phytostanolzusatz als neuartige Lebensmittel oder neuartige Lebensmittelzutaten im Sinne der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 258/97 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 105 vom 14. April 2004
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 105 vom 14. April 2004

Seite 51, Anhang 1, Satz 1:

anstatt:

„mit Ausnahme von aus Butter oder sonstigem tierischem Fett hergestellten Koch- und Bratfetten sowie Streichfetten.“

muss es heißen:

„mit Ausnahme von Koch- und Bratfetten und aus Butter oder sonstigem tierischem Fett hergestellten Streichfetten.“

---
Exhibit 8.1
 List of Subsidiaries
 1.
    
    MPEL Holdings Limited, incorporated in Cayman Islands2.
    
    MPEL International Limited, incorporated in Cayman Islands3.
    
    MPEL Nominee One Limited, incorporated in Cayman Islands4.
    
    MPEL Investments Limited, incorporated in Cayman Islands5.
    
    MPEL Nominee Three Limited, incorporated in Cayman Islands6.
    
    MPEL Nominee Two Limited, incorporated in Cayman Islands7.
    
    Melco Crown Gaming (Macau) Limited, incorporated in Macau Special Administrative Region of the Peoples Republic of China8.
    
    Melco Crown (COD) Hotels Limited, incorporated in Macau Special Administrative Region of the Peoples Republic of China9.
    
    Melco Crown (COD) Developments Limited, incorporated in Macau Special Administrative Region of the Peoples Republic of China10.
    
    Melco Crown (CM) Hotel Limited, incorporated in Macau Special Administrative Region of the Peoples Republic of China11.
    
    Melco Crown (CM) Developments Limited, incorporated in Macau Special Administrative Region of the Peoples Republic of China12.
    
    Melco Crown (Macau Peninsula) Hotel Limited, incorporated in Macau Special Administrative Region of the Peoples Republic of China13.
    
    Melco Crown (Macau Peninsula) Developments Limited, incorporated in Macau Special Administrative Region of the Peoples Republic of China14.
    
    MPEL (Macau Peninsula) Limited, incorporated in British Virgin Islands
# Official Journal C 67/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.067.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 67 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 567 March 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.067.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 67

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 567 March 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COURT OF AUDITORS |
| 2013/C 067/01 | Opinion No 1/2013 concerning the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundations and concerning the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 as regards the financing of European political parties (pursuant to Articles 287 and 322 TFEU) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COURT OF AUDITORS

2013/C 067/01

Opinion No 1/2013 concerning the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundations and concerning the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 as regards the financing of European political parties (pursuant to Articles 287 and 322 TFEU)

(pursuant to Articles 287 and 322 TFEU)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

The undersigned executive officer of FirstFederal Bancshares of Arkansas, Inc. (the “Registrant”) hereby certifiesthat the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended June 30,2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained thereinfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.

 

 
|   |   |                 | By:    | /s/ Sherri R. Billings  |
|--------|--------|----------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   |                 |   | Sherri R. Billings      |
|   |   |                 |   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   |                 |   |                    |
|   | Date:  | August 12, 2010 |   |                    |

 

----
No. 11-7854.

#### Akapo *v.*Holder, Attorney General.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 178

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the transfer of Hong Kong to

the People’s Republic of China not alter the current or future status

of the Republic of China on Taiwan.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 28, 1997

Mr. DEUTSCH submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the transfer of

Hong Kong to the People’s Republic of China not alter

the current or future status of the Republic of China

on Taiwan.

Whereas on June 9, 1898, the ‘‘Convention Respecting an

Extension of Hong Kong Territory’’ was agreed to between representatives of the governments of Great Britain and China to lease the New Territories for the period

of 99 years beginning on July 1, 1898;

Whereas on December 19, 1984, the ‘‘Sino-British Joint Declaration’’, agreed to between representatives of the governments of Great Britain and China, established the

terms for the return to China on July 1, 1997, of the

Hong Kong area (including the Hong Kong Island,
2

•HCON 178 IH

Kowloon, and the New Territories (hereafter in this resolution referred to as ‘‘Hong Kong’’);

Whereas no treaties exist between the People’s Republic of

China and Taiwan which determine the future status of

Taiwan;

Whereas the People’s Republic of China attempts to apply to

Taiwan the formula commonly known as ‘‘one country,

two systems’’ in an effort to annex Taiwan to China;

Whereas the People’s Republic of China has refused to renounce the use of force against Taiwan and held military

exercises in the Taiwan Strait in March 1996 in an attempt to intimidate the people of Taiwan in their first

presidential elections; and

Whereas the Taiwan Relations Act states that ‘‘[i]t is the

policy of the United States . . . to consider any effort to

determine the future of Taiwan by other than peaceful

means, including by boycotts or embargoes, a threat to

the peace and security of the Western Pacific area and

of grave concern to the United States’’: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) the transfer of Hong Kong to the People’s

4 Republic of China does not alter the current and fu5 ture status of Taiwan;

6 (2) the future of Taiwan should be determined

7 by peaceful means through a democratic process;

8 and
3

•HCON 178 IH

1 (3) the United States should assist in the de2 fense of Taiwan in case of threats or military attack

3 by the People’s Republic of China against Taiwan.

Æ
COURT OF A PPEAL S EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEX AS ELPASO, TEXAS

BA RRY F. MI L L ER and MARI A J . MI L L ER, Appellants,

v. SUNNY VI EW, L L C, VI EW P OI NT ACREAGE, L L C, BEL L A VI STA CUSTOM HOMES, I

NC., ANDRES E. TEL L ES D/B/A ATCON E NGI NEERI NG & SURVEYI

NG, and L ANDAMERI CA L AWYERS TI TL E OF ELPASO, Appellee s. § § § § § § § § § No. 08-10-00045- CV

Appea l from 120th District Court of El Paso County , Texas (TC # 2007-2515)

MEMORAN DUM OP INION Pending befor e the Court is the joint motion of Appellants, Ba rr y F. Miller and Maria J

. Miller, and Appellee s, Sunny View, L L C, V iew Point Acrea g e, L L C, Bella V ista Custom Homes,
I nc., and Andre s E. Telles d/b/a Atcon Eng ineer ing & Survey ing, to dismiss a portion of the appea l pursuant to T E X .R.A P P .P. 42.1 beca use the parties have rea ched a partial settlement. These parties have a g ree d to dismi ss the appea l conce rning all claims by and betwee n them. The Millers intend
to continue their appea l of an order g ranting summary judgme nt in favor of L andAmer ica L awy ers Title of El Paso. We g rant the motion and dismiss the portion of the appea l conce rning the settling parties. Pursuant to the parties’ ag ree ment, we as s es s costs ag ainst the party incurring same. See
T E X .R.A P P .P. 42.1(d)( absent ag ree ment of the parties, the court will tax costs ag ainst the appellant)

. Due to the partial dismiss al, it is nece ssary to resty le the appea l. The appea l will proce ed in the same cause number as Ba r r y F

. Mi l l er and Maria J. Miller v. LandAmerica Lawyers Titl e ofEl Paso.

J uly 30, 2010 ANN CRAWFORD McCL URE, J ustice
Be fore Chew, C.J ., McClure, a nd Rivera, JJ

. Rivera, J., not participating
#### William Benjamin BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Warden MANSUKHANI, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-7268

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 22, 2018

Decided: February 26, 2018

William Benjamin Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Jimmie Ewing, Assistant United States Attorneys, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Benjamin Brown, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Brown v. Mansukhani,*No. *3219:16-cv-03079-MGL, 2017 WL 3725318 (D.S.C. Aug. 30, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not' aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
September 24, 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals
HERITAGE GULF COAST PROPERTIES, LTD

. AND SUMER S. PINGLIA ,

Appellant s and Cross

- Appellees NO. 14

- 11

- 00976

- CV NO. 14

- 11

- 00980

- CV V.
SANDALWOOD APARTMENT S, INC., JAIKISHIN S . BHAGIA , NANIK S.

BHAGIA , AND WOODBRIDGE PROPERTIES, LLC,

Appellee s and Cross

- Appellants

________________________________ This cause, appeal s from the judg ment signed August 3, 2011 , was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order that Heritage Gulf Coast Properties, Ltd. and Sumer S. Pin glia, jointly and severally, pay one

- half of the total costs incurred by all parties to th ese appeal s , and that Sandalwood Apartments, Inc., Jaikishin S. Bhagia , Nanik S. Bhagia , and Woodbridge Properties, LLC, jointly and severally, pay one

- half of the to tal costs incurred by all parties to th ese appeal s
. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2014, byand among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor,WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, TORCHLIGHT LOANSERVICES, LLC, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asTrustee, and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as CertificateAdministrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLCas Operating Advisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, COMM 2014-CCRE20 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized termsused herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in theAgreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

  

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 23, 2009

s0316 

# Order

March 23, 2009

137463

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137463 COA: 285785 Wayne CC: 84-001491 ROBERT CANNON, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 5, 2008 order of the Court of Appeal s is considered, and it is DE NIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certainPooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014, by and amongDeutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, Wells FargoBank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as SpecialServicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, and Wells FargoBank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent andCustodian and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, withrespect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-LC17 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. 

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 of thisAgreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Servicesdo hereby certify that: 

 

1.            Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and 

 

2.           Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period. 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019. 

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: SILVER STATE HELICOPTERS, 

LLC. No. 08-80165

D.C. No.

WESTERN AIRCRAFT, INC., 08-cv-1397-RLH  Petitioner, B. Ct. No.

08-10936-MKN v.

ORDER JAMES F. LISOWSKI, SR.,

Trustee-Respondent. 

On Petition for Permission to Appeal

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d)(2)

Submitted February 23, 2009

Filed May 28, 2009

Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, and

Michael Daly Hawkins, Circuit Judge.

COUNSEL

Matthew C. Zirzow and Gerald M. Gordon, Gordon & Silver

Ltd., Las Vegas, Nevada; Jerry Hall, Jr. and Patrick Potter,

Pillsbury Wintrop Shaw Pitman LLP, Washington, D.C., for

the petitioner. 

Victoria Nelson and Ogonna M. Atamoh, Santoro Driggs

Walch Kearney Johnson & Thompson, Las Vegas, Nevada,

for the trustee-respondent. 

6329
ORDER

In the instant case, Western Aircraft (“Western”) leased

commercial real estate to Silver State Helicopters (“Silver

State”). Silver State later filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy relief.

After the trustee was appointed, Western demanded that the

trustee pay the rent that had accrued under the lease for the

first 60 days following Silver State’s filing of the bankruptcy

petition. The trustee failed to pay the rent. Western moved the

bankruptcy court for an order requiring the rental payment.

See 11 U.S.C. § 365(d)(3). The bankruptcy court denied

Western’s motion, reasoning that the timing of performance

under section 365(d)(3) is within the discretion of the bankruptcy court.

The bankruptcy court has certified for appeal the question

whether section 365(d)(3) requires the immediate payment of

accrued rent. 

Because we conclude the order at issue is fully within the

discretion of the bankruptcy court, and resolution of the

underlying issue (whether section 365(d)(3) requires the

immediate payment of accrued rent) is unlikely to have a substantial impact on the ongoing proceedings, the petition for

permission to appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d)(2) is

denied.

6330 IN RE SILVER STATE HELICOPTERS

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS

BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted

© 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.
#### IN RE: INGLEWOOD WOMAN’S CLUB, INC., Debtor. Marlene Fearing, Appellant.

No. 17-60053

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*393Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed December 26, 2017

Marlene Fearing, Pro Se

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Marlene Fearing appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing the Inglewood Woman’s Club, Inc.’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 168(d). We review de novo BAP decisions, and apply the same standard of review that the BAP applied to the bankruptcy court’s ruling. *Boyajian v. New Falls Corp. (In re Boyajian),*564 F.3d 1088, 1090 (9th Cir. 2009). We affirm.

The bankruptcy court properly denied Fearing’s motion to compel the bankruptcy court to initiate a criminal investigation because the bankruptcy court lacked the authority to do so. *See*28 U.S.C. §§ 157, 1334(b); *Gruntz v. County of Los Angeles*( *In re*Gruntz), 202 F.3d 1074, 1085 (9th Cir. 2000) (recognizing that bankruptcy jurisdiction is limited to civil proceedings).

We reject as without merit Fearing’s contentions that the BAP misconstrued the scope of appeal and that the bankruptcy court and BAP violated due process.

We do not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal or matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.