alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             164
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,407
<ALLOWANCES>                                       164
<INVENTORY>                                      1,344
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,370
<PP&E>                                           3,127
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,679
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,074
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,523
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,074
<SALES>                                          6,381
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,381
<CGS>                                            3,935
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,783
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  69
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,406)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (577)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (829)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (829)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.24)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1


               Subsidiaries of Republic Bancshares of Texas, Inc.


                                              Jurisdiction of
   Name of Subsidiary                    Incorporation or Organization
   ------------------                    -----------------------------

Republic National Bank                             United States
RBT Holdings, Inc.                                    Delaware
|WELLS
    FARGO(logo) | Corporate
                                                       Trust Services
                                                       MAC R1204-010
                                                       9062 Old Annapolis Road
                                                       Columbia, MD 21045
                                                       Tel: 410 884 2000
                                                       Fax: 410 715 2380
|--------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Re: |  | Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2014-C22
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Per
the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014 (the “Agreement”), the undersigned, a duly authorized
officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator (“Wells Fargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of
and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”):



(a) A review of
Wells Fargo’s activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such
officer’s supervision; and



(b) To the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on
such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting
Period.





February 27, 2017



|/s/
    BRIAN SMITH | 
|------------------- | 
|BRIAN
    SMITH     | 
|Vice
    President  | 



|Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. | Together
    we’ll go far
|-------------------------- | -------------------------
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Migo Software, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kent Heyman, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
      to my
      knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
      August 14, 2007





/s/
      Kent Heyman


Kent
      Heyman


Chief
      Executive Officer




The
        foregoing Certification shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by
        any
        general statement incorporating by reference this report into any filing
        under
        the Securities Act of 1933 or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
        except
        to the extent that we specifically incorporate this information by reference,
        and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.
(logo) TORCHLIGHT

LOAN SERVICES

 

 

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

 

CERTIFICATION

 

COMM 2014-CCRE20 Mortgage Trust (the “Trust”)

 

 

I, Jacob Baron, on behalf of Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as special servicer (the “Certifying Servicer”), certify to Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, the Depositor, each other Depositor and their respective officers, directors and affiliates, and with the knowledge and intent that they will rely upon this certification, that:

 

1. I (or Servicing Officers under my supervision) have reviewed the Certifying Servicer’s activities during the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”) and the Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.  

 

Date:   March 11, 2016

 

 

TORCHLIGHT LOAN SERVICES, LLC

 

By: /s/ Jacob Baron 

Name: Jacob Baron

Title:   Authorized Signatory

 

 

475 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10017

T 212.883.2800 F 212.883.2560

E info@torchlightloanservices.com

www.torchlightinvestors.com
# Official Journal C 219/7 Ju

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 219 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 607 July 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 219

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 607 July 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 219/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2017/C 219/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  ) | 9 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 219/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2017/C 219/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  )

2

9

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |
| | (2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

(2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty.

2

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 2030

In re: JOHN DAVID WHITE , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

. ( 8 :13

- cr - 00356

- GJH

- 1; 8:17

- cv - 00047

- GJH)

Submitted : January 21, 2020 Decided: January 22, 2020

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
John David White, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: John David White petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2018) motion

. He seeks an order from this c ourt directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court ’s docket reveals
that the district court denied the motion on October 23, 2019

. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided White ’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. PETITION DENIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
EXCITE, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,765
<SECURITIES>                                    27,944
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,304
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,944
<PP&E>                                          17,232
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,095)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  66,157
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,904
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     14,209
<COMMON>                                       102,002
<OTHER-SE>                                    (73,017)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,194
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,432
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,947
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                40,079
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 637
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (22,410)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (22,410)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,410)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.67)
        

</TABLE>
#### IN RE: Andrew J. REDER, Debtor, Andrew Reder Appellant, v. Paul Fisher, Appellee.

No. 16-60028

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 12, 2018 * Pasadena, California

Filed February 15, 2018

Adam Apollo, Placentia, CA, for Appellant

Scott E. Shapiro, Appell Shapiro, LLP, Sherman Oaks, CA, for Appellee

Before: McKEOWN and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges, and QUIST,** District Judge.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).-

**

 The Honorable Gordon J. Quist, United States District Judge for the Western District of Michigan, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Debtor Andrew Reder appeals from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s order determining that Reder’s $110,000 debt to Appellee Paul Fisher is nondis-chargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo decisions of the BAP. *See Scovis v. Henrichsen (In re*Scovis), 249 F.3d 975, 980 (9th Cir. 2001). “Because this court is in as good a position as the BAP to review the decision of the bankruptcy court, we review the bankruptcy court’s decision independently.” *Gayden v. Nourbakhsh (In re Nourbakhsh),*67 F.3d 798, 800 (9th Cir. 1995) (per curiam).

After a review of the record and briefing, we affirm for the reasons stated in the BAP’s well-reasoned and thorough memorandum decision entered on March 8, 2016.

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### Josephat MUA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY, MARYLAND; Verjeana M. Jacobs, Individually and as Board Chairperson of Prince George’s Public Schools; Dr. William R. Hite, Jr., Individually and as superintendent; Roger Cole Thomas, Esquire; Synthia Shilling; Monica Goldson, Individually and as Associates superintendent of Prince George’s Public Schools; American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, AFSCME; Association of Classified Employees/American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees; Pierre Dickson, Individually and as agent of the Board of Education of Prince George’s County; Dr. Kevin Maxwell, Individually and as superintendent of Prince George’s Public Schools; Dr. Alvin Crawley, Individually and as superintendent; Robert J. Gaskin, Individually and Chief Human Resources of Prince George’s Public Schools; Dr. Lillian M. Lowery; Ardra Monique O’Neal; Abbey G. Hairston, Defendants-Appellees.

*303No. 17-2027

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 22, 2018

Decided: February 26, 2018

Josephat Mua, Appellant Pro Se. Judith E. Rivlin, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, Washington, D.C.; Mark James Murphy, MOONEY, GREEN, SAINDON, MURPHY & WELCH, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Josephat Mua appeals the district court’s order denying his self-styled motion to reopen his civil case against several defendants, and also challenges the district court’s decision to return to Mua a subsequently filed motion for reconsideration. Mua has also filed motions to proceed in forma pauperis, to exceed the length limitations for his informal brief, and to file amended and supplemental briefs. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant the pending motions and affirm the district court’s order.**See Mua v. Bd. of Educ. of Prince George’s Cty., Md.,*No. 8:15-cv-02249-PJM (D. Md. Aug. 2, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*

*

 We discern no reversible error in the district court’s refusal to entertain Mua’s motion for reconsideration.
Schedule 21



SUBSIDIARIES



|Subsidiary                                  |  | Pct. Ownership |  | State of Incorporation
|------------------------------------------- |  | -------------- |  | ----------------------
|                                           
|Castle Dental Centers of Texas, Inc.        |  | 100%           |  | Texas                 
|                                           
|Castle Texas Holdings, Inc.                 |  | 100%           |  | Delaware              
|                                           
|Castle Dental Centers of Tennessee, Inc.    |  | 100%           |  | Tennessee             
|                                           
|Castle Dental Centers of Florida, Inc.      |  | 100%           |  | Florida               
|                                           
|CDC of California, Inc.                     |  | 100%           |  | Delaware              
|                                           
|Castle Dental Centers of California, L.L.C. |  | 100%           |  | Delaware              
|                                           
|(of CDC of California, Inc.)                |  |                |  |
----

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Qiang Hao, the Chief FinancialOfficer and Treasurer of GOLDEN ELEPHANT GLASS TECHNOLOGY, INC. (the "Company"),DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that: 

1.     The Company’s QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the "Report"), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and 

2.     Information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operation of the Company. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned hasexecuted this statement this 19th day of August, 2008. 

| /s/ Qiang Hao                   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                      |
| Qiang Hao                                                                                                                 |
| Chief Financial Officer and      Treasurer                                                                                |
| (Principal Financial Officer)                                                                                             |

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Golden Elephant Glass Technology, Inc. and willbe retained by Golden Elephant Glass Technology, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

The forgoing certification is being furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It isnot being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofthe Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of anygeneral incorporation language in such filing. 

----
Exhibit








 Exhibit 10.1


AMENDMENT TO
SPLUNK INC. 2012 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
Effective September 14, 2017


The Splunk Inc. (the “Company”) 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended effective as of the date approved by the Company’s Board of Directors as follows:


1.Section 13 of the Plan is amended as follows:


(a)The caption of Section 13 of the Plan is amended and restated as follows:


“Adjustments; Dissolution or Liquidation; Merger or Change in Control; Death.”


(b)A new clause (e) is added to Section 13 of the Plan as follows:


“Death.  Unless otherwise determined by the Administrator, if an Employee or Outside Director Participant ceases to be an Employee or Outside Director, as applicable, as a result of such Participant’s death, then such Participant will immediately become one hundred percent (100%) vested in and have the right to exercise Options and/or Stock Appreciation Rights as to one hundred percent (100%) of the Shares underlying such Award, including those Shares which would not otherwise be vested or exercisable; one hundred percent (100%) of the aggregate restrictions initially on Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units will lapse; with respect to Awards with performance-based vesting for which the achievement of designated performance goals has been determined, Participant will immediately become vested in one hundred percent (100%) of the earned Awards; and, with respect to Awards for which the achievement of designated performance goals or other vesting criteria has not yet been determined, all performance goals or other vesting criteria required to be met for such Awards to be earned will be deemed achieved at target levels and Participant will immediately become vested in one hundred percent (100%) of the earned Awards, provided that if such termination of the Participant occurs following the end of the performance period for any performance goal but prior to the determination of the achievement of such performance goal, then the achievement of such performance goal will be determined based on actual performance and Participant will immediately become vested in one hundred percent (100%) of the earned Awards. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, if the Participant has not been continuously an Employee or Outside Director, as applicable, for at least 12 months prior to the day the Participant ceases to be an Employee or Outside Director as a result of the Participant’s death, then for each reference to “one hundred percent (100%)” in the foregoing sentence, “fifty percent (50%)” will be substituted. Any Options that become vested and exercisable pursuant to this paragraph shall be exercisable in accordance with Section 6(d)(iv) and the applicable Award Agreement.”


2.Except as otherwise expressly set forth herein, all terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.