alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.1



THIRD AMENDMENT TO
THE REALOGY GROUP LLC
EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN




The Realogy Group LLC Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows, effective as of January 1, 2017:


1.    Section 3.01 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following paragraph immediately following the end thereof: 


“Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Employee shall be an Eligible Employee under this Plan effective as of January 1, 2017.”


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and as evidence of the adoption of this Third Amendment, Realogy Group LLC has caused the same to be executed by its duly authorized officer on this 15th day of December 2017.




	
			
	ATTEST:
	 
	REALOGY GROUP LLC

	 
	 
	 

	/s/ Seth Truwit
	By:
	/s/ Marilyn J. Wasser

	 
	Name:
	Marilyn J. Wasser

	 
	Title:
	Executive Vice President, General Counsel and 
Corporate Secretary
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-16-00393-CR

MARCUS ESEDE ALI

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 4 of Travis County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-1-CR-15-218479

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 28, 2018
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 

FOURTH AMENDMENT TO 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Fourth Amendment”) is made the
11th day of December, 2017 by and between Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Virginia E. Shanks, an individual (“Executive”), with
respect to the following facts and circumstances: 
 RECITALS 

The Company and Executive entered into an Employment Agreement on October 13, 2014 (the “Original Agreement”), which was
amended by the First Amendment to Employment Agreement on December 18, 2014, the Second Amendment to Employment Agreement on December 21, 2015 and the Third Amendment to Employment Agreement on December 15, 2016 (collectively, with
the Original Agreement, the “Employment Agreement”). 
 The Company and Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement
pursuant to the terms set forth herein. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and agreements set forth
herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 AMENDMENT 

1. Effective as of January 1, 2018, Article 3, Section 3.1 of the Employment Agreement (Base Salary) is hereby deleted in its
entirety and replaced with the following new Article 3, Section 3.1: 
 “3.1 Base Salary. In consideration for
Executive’s services hereunder, the Company shall pay Executive an annual base salary at the rate of Seven Hundred Thousand Dollars ($700,000) per year effective as of January 1, 2018 through the end of the Term; payable in accordance with
the Company’s regular payroll schedule from time to time (less any deductions required for Social Security, state, federal and local withholding taxes, and any other authorized or mandated similar withholdings).” 

2. Except as modified herein, all other terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. In the event of a conflict
between the terms of the Employment Agreement and this Fourth Amendment, the terms of this Fourth Amendment shall apply. No modification may be made to the Employment Agreement or this Fourth Amendment except in writing and signed by both the
Company and Executive. 
 [SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Fourth Amendment to be duly executed as
of the date first written above. 
  

							
	EXECUTIVE	 		 	PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
				
	 /s/ Virginia E. Shanks
	 		 	By:	  	 /s/ Anthony M. Sanfilippo

	Virginia E. Shanks	 		 		  	Anthony M. Sanfilippo, Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 11685]

# ACTION:

Announcement of a federal advisory committee meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), notice is hereby given of a public meeting of the International Digital Economy and Telecommunication (IDET) Advisory Committee via videoconference on Wednesday, April 27 at 1:00 p.m.-3:00 p.m. (ET). The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the committee's next priorities.

# DATES:

April 27, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Please contact the Designated Federal Officer (DFO) Daniel Oates at                         *IDET@state.gov*                         or (202) 647-5205.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Additional information about the IDET is accessible at                     *https://www.state.gov/​international-digital-economy-and-telecommunication-advisory-committee.*

                    IDET meetings are open to the public, and we encourage anyone wanting to attend this virtual meeting to contact                     *IDET@state.gov*                     to register by COB April 17 with their name, contact information, affiliation, and any request for reasonable accommodation. Requests for reasonable accommodation made after that time will be considered but might                           ( print page 17380)                        not be able to be accommodated. The public may have an opportunity to provide comments at this meeting at the invitation of the chair. Members of the public may also submit a brief comment (less than three pages) to the committee in writing to                     *IDET@state.gov*                     for inclusion in the public minutes of the meeting.                

## Agenda

### Wednesday, April 27 at 1:00 p.m. (ET)

    - Roll call
    - Project Planning
    - Next Steps and Other Business
    - Public Comment
    - Adjournment

Kevin E. Bryant,

Deputy Director, Office of Directives Management, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2022-06418 Filed 3-25-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-AE-P
Exhibit 32.1


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, John Stephens, Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, of Biofield
Corp. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended
June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: November 21, 2003                By: /s/ JOHN D. STEPHENS
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           John D. Stephens
                                           Senior Vice President and Chief
                                           Operating Officer (Principal
                                           Accounting and Financial Officer)


                                       23
#### UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. William Arthur COOPER, Jr. Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-2282

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: December 27, 2017

Filed: January 10, 2018

Patrick McElyea, Special Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S, Attorney’s Office, Davenport, IA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

William Arthur Cooper, Pro Se

Before GRUENDER* MURPHY and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

William Cooper directly appeals the district court’s1 modification of the conditions of his supervised release. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief arguing that the district court abused its discretion in ordering 120 days of home detention as a modification to Cooper’s conditions of supervised release.

*408After careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in modifying the conditions of Cooper’s release. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(2)(2) (district court may modify conditions of supervised release at any time prior to expiration or termination of term of supervised relief); United States v. Davies, 380 F.3d 329, 332 (8th Cir. 2004) (standard of review); cf. United States v. Wiedower, 634 F.3d 490, 493 (8th Cir. 2011) (court has broad discretion when imposing release conditions; when crafting special condition, court must make individualized inquiry into facts and circumstances underlying case and make sufficient findings on record so as to ensure condition satisfies statutory requirements). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

1

, The Honorable John A. Jarvéy, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern ■ District of Iowa.
# IMMC.EESC-2020-05552-AC.ENG.xhtml.EESC-2020-05552-00-00-AC-TRA-EN.docx

EN

TEN/734

TEN/734

Minimum level of training of seafarers (codification)

Minimum level of training of seafarers (codification)

OPINION


  European Economic and Social Committee


  Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the minimum level of training of seafarers (codification)

OPINION

European Economic and Social Committee

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the minimum level of training of seafarers (codification)

[COM(2020) 739 final - 2020/0329 (COD)]

[COM(2020) 739 final - 2020/0329 (COD)]

Referrals

| Referrals | European Parliament, 23/11/2020


  Council of the European Union, 27/11/2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Legal basis | Articles 100(2) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union |
| Section responsible | Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and the Information Society |
| Adopted at plenary | 27/01/2021 |
| Plenary session No | 557 |
| Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions) | unanimous |

Referrals

European Parliament, 23/11/2020

European Parliament, 23/11/2020

Council of the European Union, 27/11/2020

Council of the European Union, 27/11/2020

Legal basis

Legal basis

Articles 100(2) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Articles 100(2) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Section responsible

Section responsible

Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and the Information Society

Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and the Information Society

Adopted at plenary

Adopted at plenary

27/01/2021

27/01/2021

Plenary session No

Plenary session No

557

557

Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions)

Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions)

unanimous

unanimous

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided unanimously, at its 557th plenary session of 27 and 28 January 2021 (meeting of 27 January), to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided unanimously, at its 557th plenary session of 27 and 28 January 2021 (meeting of 27 January), to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Christa SCHWENG

Christa SCHWENG

The president of the European Economic and Social Committee

The president of the European Economic and Social Committee

_____________
# Official Journal L 118/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 118 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5722 April 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 118

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5722 April 2014

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 374/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on the reduction or elimination of customs duties on goods originating in Ukraine | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) No 374/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on the reduction or elimination of customs duties on goods originating in Ukraine

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### IN RE: YONGPING DAI, Xuhuai Dong, Wei Fan, Yi Fan, Appellants

2017-1436

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

January 12, 2018

George G. Wang, Bei & Ocean, Milling-ton, NJ, argued for appellants.

Michael Sumner Forman, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by Nathan K. Kelley, Thomas W. Krause, Robert McBride.

(Dyk, Reyna, and Hughes, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           21,624
<SECURITIES>                                     61,689
<RECEIVABLES>                                    22,907
<ALLOWANCES>                                        707
<INVENTORY>                                       6,297
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                122,555
<PP&E>                                           20,657
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2,053
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  141,721
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             8,636
<BONDS>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             31
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                      133,054
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    141,721
<SALES>                                          57,197
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 57,197
<CGS>                                            11,240
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    11,240
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 22,998
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  26,159
<INCOME-TAX>                                      9,155
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     17,004
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.54
        


</TABLE>
June 25, 2015

Ms. Alissa Norland

3700 42 nd Street South Fargo, ND 58104

Dear Ms. Norland:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) . It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your June 11, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-2238), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### Kwame TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M&T BANK; Rene F. Jones, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of M&T Bank, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-2251

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 22, 2018

Decided: February 26, 2018

Kwame Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael McIntyre,. REED SMITH, LLP, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for Appellees.

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kwame Taylor appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss Taylor’s claims relating to M&T Bank’s acquisition of his mortgage from a previous lender. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Taylor v. M&T Bank,*No. 1:17-cv-02434-RDB (D. Md. Sept. 25, 2017). We dispense wit]i oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
# L_2013246EN.01S00302.xml

| 17.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 246/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 246/s3

---

NOTE TO READERS — WAY OF REFERRING TO ACTS

As of 1 July 2013 the way of referring to acts has changed.

During a transitional period this new practice will coexist with the previous one.

---
SERVED JUNE 1,2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION f^-oi QZ - • '.iqon'^T/giQ^i 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS ' ' " ^^ ^ S 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

PETER Z. SIMONS 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10NM0004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2010-0534 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2009NM700173) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

Rormie A. 

Chief Administrati 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP10NM0004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Peter Z. Simons, Respondent 

2216 N. Farragut Avenue 

Colorado Springs, CO 80907 

Scott R. Morris, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of Regional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, WA 98057 

TEL: 425-227-2007 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

WILLIAM ARTHUR MAXWELL

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 1432

[ August 17, 2017 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County ; Cynthia L. Cox

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 312012CF001531A

.

William Arthur Maxwell, Crawfordville, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C IKLIN

, L EVINE and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 11-10984.

#### Flemming *v.*Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, L. L. P., et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-23-0000364

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

LEONA R. WILSON, TRUSTEE OF THE LEONA R. WILSON REVOCABLE TRUST

DATED DECEMBER 27, 2001, Petitioner-Appellee, v.

SIR JON FREEMAN ELEU SANTOS, aka JON SANTOS,

aka PRINCE NI ILOA MOE-KAPU KAMEHAMEHA,

Respondent-Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT

(CASE NO. 2CSP-23-0000007)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

(By: Wadsworth, Presiding Judge, Nakasone and Guidry, JJ.)

Upon review of the record, it appears that:

(1) The opening brief was due on a first extension on

or before August 31, 2023; 

(2) Self-represented Respondent-Appellant Sir John

Freeman Eleu Santos, aka Jon Santos, aka Prince Ni i Loa Moe-Kapu

Kamehameha (Santos) failed to file the opening brief or request a

further extension of time;

(3) On September 6, 2023, the appellate clerk entered a

default notice1 informing Santos that the time for filing the

opening brief had expired, the matter would be called to the

court's attention on September 18, 2023, for appropriate action,

1 The default notice was electronically mailed to Santos on

September 6, 2023.

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-23-0000364

09-NOV-2023

07:51 AM

Dkt. 41 ODSD
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

which could include dismissal of the appeal under Hawai i Rules

of Appellate Procedure Rule 30, and Santos could request relief

from default by motion; and 

(4) Santos not taken any further action in this appeal.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is

dismissed. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, November 9, 2023.

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth

Presiding Judge

/s/ Karen T. Nakasone

Associate Judge

/s/ Kimberly T. Guidry

Associate Judge

2