alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Long Island Physician Holdings
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Paul Kolker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Paul Kolker
--------------------------------
Paul Kolker,
President, Chairman of the Board
(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: ______________________________

      This certification accompanies the above-described Report on Form 10-Q
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except
to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


                                       22
(logo) CWCapital

ASSET MANAGEMENT

 

 

Annual Statement as to Compliance

For the Period of January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014

 

 

 

JPMBB 2014-C23  

 

 

                

In accordance with Item 1123 of Regulation AB andwith the requirements detailed in §11.09 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) for the above-mentioned CMBS pool, (the “CMBS Pool”), CWCapital Asset Management LLC (“CWCAM”), in its capacity as Special Servicer, is providing this Officer’s Certificate with respect to the following:

 

(A)          a review of CWCAM’s activities during the preceding calendar year or portion thereof  (the “Reporting Period”) and of CWCAM’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and;

 

(B)           to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, CWCAM has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.  

 

Sincerely,

CWCapital Asset Management LLC

 

/s/ David B. Iannarone

David B. Iannarone

President

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7501 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 500 West, Bethesda, MD  20814 www.cwcapital.com
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.38
 DEFAULT WAIVER AND SIXTH AMENDMENT
TO
LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT
 DEFAULT WAIVER AND SIXTH AMENDMENT nd
 Recitals
 A.
 B.
 C.
 D.
 Agreement
 Now, Therefore,
 1. Definitions.
 2. Waiver of Covenant Default.




---



##### 



3. Amendment to Loan Agreement.
 3.1 Section 6.7 Financial Covenants
  4. Limitation of Amendment.
 4.1 Section 3
 4.2
 5. Representations and Warranties.
 5.1
 5.2
 5.3
 5.4
 5.5
 5.6




---



##### 



5.7
 6. Prior Agreement
 7. Release by Borrower
 7.1 FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION Released
Claims
 7.2
 7.3
 7.4




---



##### 



7.5
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 (d)
 (e)
 8. Integration
 9. Counterparts.
 10. Effectiveness
 11. Governing Law.




---



##### 



In Witness Whereof,
 BANK
    
    
    
    BORROWERSilicon Valley Bank
    
    
    
    QualMark CorporationBy:
    
    
    
    
    
    By:Name:
    
    
    
    
    
    Name:Title:
    
    
    
    
    
    Title:QualMark ACG CorporationBy:Name:Title:QualMark Ling CorporationBy:Name:Title:
#### Rhett BEAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SUSSEX I STATE PRISON, WARDEN, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-7316

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 22, 2018

Decided: February 27, 2018

Rhett Bean, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Stallard, Assistant Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

*325Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rhett Bean seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bean has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
#### LeAnthony WINSTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-7398

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 30, 2018

Decided: February 2, 2018

LeAnthony Winston, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

LeAnthony Winston seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition for failure to exhaust state court remedies. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural raling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have reviewed the record and Win-ton’s informal brief and conclude that Winston has failed to challenge on appeal the district court’s dispositive procedural rul*179ing. *See*4th Cir. R. 34(b). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
# Official Journal L 247/21 S

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 247 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5021 September 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 247

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5021 September 2007

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DIRECTIVES |
| | * | Directive 2007/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 September 2007 amending Council Directive 92/49/EEC and Directives 2002/83/EC, 2004/39/EC, 2005/68/EC and 2006/48/EC as regards procedural rules and evaluation criteria for the prudential assessment of acquisitions and increase of holdings in the financial sector
   (1) | 1 |
| | * | Directive 2007/45/EC Of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 September 2007 laying down rules on nominal quantities for prepacked products, repealing Council Directives 75/106/EEC and 80/232/EEC, and amending Council Directive 76/211/EEC | 17 |
| | * | Directive 2007/47/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 September 2007 amending Council Directive 90/385/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to active implantable medical devices, Council Directive 93/42/EEC concerning medical devices and Directive 98/8/EC concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market
   (1) | 21 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

DIRECTIVES

*

Directive 2007/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 September 2007 amending Council Directive 92/49/EEC and Directives 2002/83/EC, 2004/39/EC, 2005/68/EC and 2006/48/EC as regards procedural rules and evaluation criteria for the prudential assessment of acquisitions and increase of holdings in the financial sector
   (1)

1

*

Directive 2007/45/EC Of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 September 2007 laying down rules on nominal quantities for prepacked products, repealing Council Directives 75/106/EEC and 80/232/EEC, and amending Council Directive 76/211/EEC

17

*

Directive 2007/47/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 September 2007 amending Council Directive 90/385/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to active implantable medical devices, Council Directive 93/42/EEC concerning medical devices and Directive 98/8/EC concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market
   (1)

21

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 22, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, December 22, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22A0610. BARBARA W. DAVIS v. HUMBLED ROOFING AND RESTORATION, LLC.
The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this Court and with Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13. On December 07, 2021, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors and a brief no later than December 17, 2021. As of the date of this order, the appellant's enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).
Exhibit  32.1







STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE 
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned, Andrew Gordon, is the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Coffee Holding Co., Inc.(the Company).

This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2008 (the Report).

By execution of this statement, I certify that:

A)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

B)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Coffee Holding Co., Inc. and will be retained by Coffee Holding Co., Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                          |     |                  
|------------------------- | --- | -----------------
|                          |     |                  
|                          |     |                  
|Date:  September 10, 2008 | By: | /s/ Andrew Gordon
|                          |     | Andrew Gordon
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Marcos BATZ, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-10738 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed January 26, 2018

*318James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Marcos Batz, Pro Se

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Marcos Batz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Batz has filed a response. To the extent that Batz raises a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of the claim; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. *See United States v. Isgar,*739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Batz’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 99.1

   MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA


Management of National Education Loan Network, Inc. (the Company) is responsible
for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)
of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission for publicly-issued
student loan-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006, for which the
Company provides services as a master servicer and administrator (the Platform).

The Company's management has assessed the effectiveness of the Company's
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2006. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set
forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of
Regulation AB.

Based on such assessment, management believes that, as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2006, the Company has complied in all material respects with the
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB of the Securities
and Exchange Commission, except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii),
1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(iv),
1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(viii),
1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii),
1122(d)(4)(xiii), and 1122(d)(4)(xiv), which the Company has determined are not
applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report
with respect to managment's assessment of compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006.


April 2, 2007                       National Education Loan Network, Inc.


                                     /s/ MICHAEL S. DUNLAP
                                     --------------------------------------
                                    Michael S. Dunlap, Chairman, CEO, President
                                    National Education Loan Network, Inc.


                                    /s/ TERRY J. HEIMES__________________
                                    -------------------
                                    Terry J. Heimes, CFO, Treasurer
                                    National Education Loan Network, Inc.
No. D-2722.

#### In re Discipline of DeJong.

Pieter J. DeJong, of Long Valley, N. J., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
**EXHIBIT ITEM 32.2**

 

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

 

 

Thecertification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and ExchangeCommission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63of Title 18 of the United States Code.

 

August 11, 2003

 

Bruce N. Warner, theChief Financial Officer of Northern California Bancorp, Inc. certifies:

 

3.               that thisperiodic report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

4.               that informationcontained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Northern CaliforniaBancorp, Inc..

 

 
|   | /s/ Bruce  N. Warner                                  |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Bruce N.  Warner                                           |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer and  Principal Accounting Officer |

 

1

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-4740

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DOUGLAS J. DODSON, JR., a/k/a Becky,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.

(CR-95-73)

Submitted: April 29, 1999 Decided: May 5, 1999

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrea C. Long, BOONE, BEALE, COSBY & LONG, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellant. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Nicholas S.

Altimari, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Douglas J. Dodson, Jr., was convicted of conspiracy to distribute heroin and cocaine, two counts of possession with intent to

distribute a controlled substance, and possession of a firearm by

a convicted felon. He was sentenced to life in prison for conspiracy, 240 months on each of the possession counts, and 120

months on the firearm count. The 240-month sentences and the 120-

month sentence run concurrently with the life sentence. Judgment

was imposed on September 21, 1998, and entered on the docket on

September 22. Dodson, through his attorney, filed his notice of

appeal on October 7, 1998.

In criminal cases, a defendant must file his notice of appeal

within ten days of the entry of judgment. See Fed. R. App. P.

4(b)(1), 26(a). Upon a showing of good cause or excusable neglect

and with or without a motion, the district court may grant an

extension of up to thirty days to file the notice of appeal. See

Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353

(4th Cir. 1985). When an appellant files a notice of appeal after

expiration of the ten-day period but within the thirty-day extension period, unless excusable neglect or good cause is clear from

the record, the district court must make factual findings concerning whether excusable neglect or good cause exists warranting

extension of the appeal period. See id.
3

Dodson’s notice of appeal was filed after expiration of the

ten-day appeal period but within the thirty-day extension period.

Accordingly, we remand this case to the district court with instructions to make factual findings concerning whether excusable

neglect or good cause exists to justify extending the ten-day

appeal period. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

We defer ruling on the motion to file a pro se supplemental brief

pending a decision by the district court.

REMANDED
**EXHIBIT ITEM 32.1**

 

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

 

The certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

 

February 8, 2011

 

Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of Northern California Bancorp, Inc. certifies:

 

a.               that this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

b.              that information contained in this Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Northern California Bancorp, Inc.

 

 
|   | /s/   Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr. |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Charles   T. Chrietzberg, Jr.     |
|   | Chief   Executive Officer              |
|   | and   President                        |

 

----