# Official Journal C 390/16 N

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 390 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6316 November 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 390

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6316 November 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2020/C 390/01 | Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2020/C 390/01

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2020/C 390/02 | Joined Cases C-449/18 P and C-474/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 September 2020 — European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v Lionel Andrés Messi Cuccittini, J.M.-E.V. e hijos SRL (C-449/18 P) and J.M.-E.V. e hijos SRL v Lionel Andrés Messi Cuccittini, European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (C-474/18 P) (Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark MESSI — Earlier EU word marks MASSI — Partial refusal of registration) | 2 |
| 2020/C 390/03 | Case C-594/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 September 2020 — Republic of Austria v European Commission and Others (Appeal — State aid — Article 107(3)(c) TFEU — Articles 11 and 194 TFEU — Article 1, Article 2(c) and Article 106a(3) of the Euratom Treaty — Planned aid for Hinkley Point C nuclear power station (United Kingdom) — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market — Objective of common interest — Environmental objectives of the European Union — Principle of protection of the environment, ‘polluter pays’ principle, precautionary principle and principle of sustainability — Determination of the economic activity concerned — Market failure — Proportionality of the aid — Operating or investment aid — Determination of the aid elements — Guarantee Notice) | 3 |
| 2020/C 390/04 | Case C-648/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul București — Romania) — Autoritatea națională de reglementare în domeniul energiei (ANRE) v Societatea de Producere a Energiei Electrice în Hidrocentrale Hidroelectrica SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Internal market in electricity — Free movement of goods — Article 35 TFEU — Quantitative restrictions on exports — Measures having equivalent effect — National measure requiring electricity producers to offer for sale all the electricity available to them exclusively on a centralised competitive market of the Member State concerned) | 3 |
| 2020/C 390/05 | Joined Cases C-724/18 and C-727/18: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 September 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — Cali Apartments SCI (C-724/18) and HX (C-727/18) v Procureur général près la cour d’appel de Paris and Ville de Paris (References for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2006/123/EC — Scope — Repeated short-term letting of furnished premises to a transient clientele which does not take up residence there — National legislation imposing a prior authorisation scheme for certain specific municipalities and making those municipalities responsible for defining the conditions for granting the authorisations provided for by that scheme — Article 4(6) — Concept of ‘authorisation scheme’ — Article 9 — Justification — Insufficient supply of affordable long-term rental housing — Proportionality — Article 10 — Requirements relating to the conditions for granting authorisations) | 4 |
| 2020/C 390/06 | Case C-806/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Criminal proceedings against JZ (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Return of illegally staying third-country nationals — Directive 2008/115/EC — Article 11 — Entry ban — Third-country national against whom an entry ban was issued but who never left the Member State concerned — National legislation providing for a custodial sentence in the event of the third-country national staying in that Member State despite notice of the entry ban issued against him) | 5 |
| 2020/C 390/07 | Joined Cases C-807/18 and C-39/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 September 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — Telenor Magyarország Zrt. v Nemzeti Média- és Hírközlési Hatóság Elnöke (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Electronic communications — Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 — Article 3 — Open internet access — Article 3(1) — Rights of end users — Right to access applications and services and to use them — Right to provide applications and services — Article 3(2) — Prohibition of agreements and commercial practices limiting the exercise of end users’ rights — Concepts of ‘agreements’, ‘commercial practices’, ‘end users’ and ‘consumers’ — Assessment of whether the exercise of end users’ rights is limited — Detailed rules — Article 3(3) — Obligation of equal and non-discriminatory treatment of traffic — Possibility of implementing reasonable traffic-management measures — Prohibition of measures blocking and slowing down traffic — Exceptions — Commercial practices consisting in offering packages which provide (i) that customers subscribing to them purchase a tariff entitling them to use a given data volume without restriction, without any deduction being made from that volume for using certain specific applications and services covered by ‘a zero tariff’ and (ii) that once the data volume has been used up, those customers may continue to use those specific applications and services without restriction, while measures blocking or slowing down traffic are applied to the other applications and services) | 6 |
| 2020/C 390/08 | Case C-12/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 September 2020 — Mylène Troszczynski v European Parliament (Appeal — Law governing the institutions — Member of the European Parliament — Protocol on the privileges and immunities of the European Union — Article 8 — Parliamentary immunity — Activity not connected to parliamentary duties — Publication on the Member’s Twitter account — Article 9 — Parliamentary privilege — Scope — Decision to waive parliamentary immunity) | 7 |
| 2020/C 390/09 | Case C-121/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 September 2020 — Edison SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (Appeal — EU trade mark — Application for registration of a figurative mark including the word element EDISON — Interpretation of the terms in the heading of a class of the Nice Classification and in the accompanying alphabetical list) | 7 |
| 2020/C 390/10 | Case C-122/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 September 2020 — Hamas v Council of the European Union, French Republic, European Commission (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Fight against terrorism — Restrictive measures taken against certain persons and entities — Freezing of funds — Common Position 2001/931/CFSP — Article 1(4) and (6) — Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 — Article 2(3) — Retention of an organisation on the list of persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts — Conditions — Competent authority equivalent to a judicial authority — Sentencing decision — Ongoing risk of involvement in terrorist activities — Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds — Obligation to state reasons — Right to effective judicial protection) | 8 |
| 2020/C 390/11 | Case C-312/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas — Lithuania) — XT v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2006/112/EC — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Article 9(1) — Article 193 — Concept of ‘taxable person’ — Joint activity agreement — Partnership — Allocation of an economic transaction to one of the partners — Determination of the taxable person liable for the tax) | 8 |
| 2020/C 390/12 | Case C-339/19: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție — Romania) — SC Romenergo SA, Aris Capital SA v Autoritatea de Supraveghere Financiară (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Free movement of capital — Company law — Shares admitted to trading on the regulated market — Financial investment company — National regulations limiting the shareholding in certain financial investment companies — Statutory presumption of concerted action) | 9 |
| 2020/C 390/13 | Case C-363/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Patent- och marknadsdomstolen vid Stockholms tingsrätt — Sweden) — Konsumentombudsmannen v Mezina AB (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Food safety — Nutritional and health claims concerning foodstuffs — Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 — Articles 5 and 6 — Scientific substantiation for claims — Generally accepted scientific evidence — Article 10(1) — Article 28(5) — Transitional arrangements — Unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market — Directive 2005/29/EC — Article 3(4) — Relationship between the provisions of Directive 2005/29 and other EU rules regulating specific aspects of unfair commercial practices) | 10 |
| 2020/C 390/14 | Case C-367/19: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Državna revizijska komisija za revizijo postopkov oddaje javnih naročil — Slovenia) — Tax-Fin-Lex d.o.o. v Ministrstvo za notranje zadeve (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public service contracts — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 2(1)(5) — Concept of ‘public contract’ — Concept of ‘contract for pecuniary interest’ — Tenderer’s bid at a price of EUR 0.00 — Rejection of the tender — Article 69 — Abnormally low tender) | 11 |
| 2020/C 390/15 | Case C-386/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 September 2020 — Hamas v Council of the European Union, European Commission (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Fight against terrorism — Restrictive measures taken against certain persons and entities — Freezing of funds — Common Position 2001/931/CFSP — Article 1(4) and (6) — Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 — Article 2(3) — Retention of an organisation on the list of persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts — Conditions — Competent authority equivalent to a judicial authority — Sentencing decision — Ongoing risk of involvement in terrorist activities — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection) | 11 |
| 2020/C 390/16 | Case C-462/19: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Comisión Nacional de los Mercados y la Competencia — Spain) — proceedings against Asociación Nacional de Empresas Estibadoras y Consignatarios de Buques (Anesco), Comisiones Obreras, Coordinadora Estatal de Trabajadores del Mar (CETM), Confederación Intersindical Gallega, Eusko Langileen Alkartasuna, Langile Abertzaleen Batzordeak, Unión General de Trabajadores (UGT) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Meaning of ‘court or tribunal’ for the purposes of Article 267 TFEU — Criteria — Comisión Nacional de los Mercados y la Competencia (National Commission on Markets and Competition, Spain) — Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling) | 12 |
| 2020/C 390/17 | Case C-498/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 September 2020 — Romania v European Commission (Appeal — European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF), the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) — Decision of the European Commission excluding expenditure from EU financing — Notification to the addressee — Error in the printing of the annex — Publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union — Time limit for filing appeal — Point from which time starts to run — Lateness — Principle of legal certainty — Observance of the adversarial principle) | 13 |
| 2020/C 390/18 | Case C-509/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht München — Germany) — BMW Bayerische Motorenwerke AG v Hauptzollamt München (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs Union — Union Customs Code — Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 — Article 71(1)(b) — Customs value — Imports of electronic products equipped with software) | 13 |
| 2020/C 390/19 | Case C-528/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Mitteldeutsche Hartstein-Industrie AG v Finanzamt Y (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC — Article 17(2)(a) — Deduction of input tax — Origin and scope of the right to deduct — Extension of a road belonging to a municipality — Entry in the accounts of the costs incurred by the works as part of the taxable person’s general costs — Determination of the existence of a direct and immediate link with the economic activity of the taxable person — Supply made free of charge — Supply to be treated as a supply made for consideration — Article 5(6)) | 14 |
| 2020/C 390/20 | Case C-669/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 September 2020 — BP v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (Appeal — Non-contractual liability — Access to documents — Protection of personal data — Allegedly irregular disclosure of such data — Regulations (EC) No 1049/2001 and No 45/2001 — Admissibility of pleas and offers of evidence before the General Court of the European Union — Allocation of costs) | 15 |
| 2020/C 390/21 | Case C-674/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas — Lithuania) — ‘Skonis ir kvapas’ UAB v Muitinės departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Structure and rates of excise duty applied to manufactured tobacco — Directive 2011/64/EU — Article 2(2) — Article 5(1) — Concept of ‘Products consisting in whole or in part of substances other than tobacco’ — Concept of ‘Smoking tobacco’ — Water-pipe tobacco) | 15 |
| 2020/C 390/22 | Case C-738/19: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam — Netherlands) — A v B, C (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Annex, point 1(e) — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Social housing — Obligation of residence and prohibition on subletting the property — Article 3(1) and (3) — Article 4(1) — Assessment of whether penalty clauses are unfair — Criteria) | 16 |
| 2020/C 390/23 | Case C-89/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Županijski sud u Puli (Croatia) lodged on 20 February 2020 — criminal proceedings against GR, HS, IT, and INTER CONSULTING d.o.o., in liquidation | 16 |
| 2020/C 390/24 | Case C-113/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky (Slovakia) lodged on 28 February 2020 — Slovenský plynárenský priemysel, a.s. v Finančné riaditel’stvo Slovenskej republiky | 17 |
| 2020/C 390/25 | Case C-239/20 P: Appeal brought on 5 June 2020 by Giorgio Armani SpA against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 26 March 2020 in Case T-653/18, Armani v EUIPO | 17 |
| 2020/C 390/26 | Case C-240/20 P: Appeal brought on 5 June 2020 by Giorgio Armani SpA against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 26 March 2020 in Case T-654/18, Armani v EUIPO | 18 |
| 2020/C 390/27 | Case C-360/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from Tribunalul Argeș (Romania) lodged on 4 August 2020 — Ministerul Dezvoltării Regionale și Administrației Publice v NE | 18 |
| 2020/C 390/28 | Case C-365/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 4 August 2020 — Eurowings GmbH v GDVI Verbraucherhilfe GmbH | 19 |
| 2020/C 390/29 | Case C-370/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 7 August 2020 — Pro Rauchfrei e.V. v JS e.K. | 20 |
| 2020/C 390/30 | Case C-376/20 P: Appeal brought on 7 August 2020 by European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 28 May 2020 in Case T-399/16, CK Telecoms UK Investments Ltd v Commission | 20 |
| 2020/C 390/31 | Case C-414/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 4 September 2020 — Criminal proceedings against MM | 22 |
| 2020/C 390/32 | Case C-416/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 7 September 2020 — TR | 22 |
| 2020/C 390/33 | Case C-431/20 P: Appeal brought on 12 September 2020 by Carlo Tognoli and Others against the order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 3 July 2020 in Joined Cases T-395/19, T-396/19, T-405/19, T-408/19, T-419/19, T-423/19, T-424/19, T-428/19, T-433/19, T-437/19, T-443/19, T-455/19, T-458/19 to T-462/19, T-464/19, T-469/19 and T-477/19, Tognoli and Others v Parliament | 23 |
| 2020/C 390/34 | Case C-432/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 14 September 2020 — ZK | 24 |
| | General Court |
| 2020/C 390/35 | Case T-796/16: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — CEDC International v EUIPO — Underberg (Shape of a blade of grass in a bottle) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for an EU three-dimensional mark — Shape of a blade of grass in a bottle — Earlier three-dimensional national mark — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 15(1) and Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 18(1) and Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Nature of use — Alteration of distinctive character — Use in conjunction with other marks — Scope of the protection — Requirement for clarity and precision — Requirement for the description and the representation to align with one another — Decision taken following annulment of an earlier decision by the General Court — Reference to the grounds of an earlier annulled decision — Obligation to state reasons) | 25 |
| 2020/C 390/36 | Case T-411/17: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Landesbank Baden-Württemberg v SRB (Economic and monetary union — Banking union — Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) — Single Resolution Fund (SRF) — Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2017 ex ante contributions — Action for annulment — Direct and individual concern — Admissibility — Essential procedural requirements — Authentication of the decision — Obligation to state reasons — Right to effective judicial protection — Plea of illegality — Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment) | 26 |
| 2020/C 390/37 | Case T-414/17: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Hypo Vorarlberg Bank v SRB (Economic and monetary union — Banking union — Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) — Single Resolution Fund (SRF) — Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2017 ex ante contributions — Action for annulment — Direct and individual concern — Admissibility — Essential procedural requirements — Authentication of the decision — Obligation to state reasons — Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment) | 27 |
| 2020/C 390/38 | Case T-420/17: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Portigon v SRB (Economic and monetary union — Banking union — Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) — Single Resolution Fund (SRF) — Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2017 ex ante contributions — Action for annulment — Direct and individual concern — Admissibility — Essential procedural requirements — Authentication of the decision — Obligation to state reasons — Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment) | 27 |
| 2020/C 390/39 | Case T-565/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — P. Krücken Organic v Commission (Institutional law — Action for damages — Conditions in which the European Union incurs non-contractual liability — Arrangements for imports of organic products from third countries — Private inspection body — Concept of appropriate supervision within the meaning of Article 33(3) of Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 — Regulation (EC) No 1235/2008 — Attributability of conduct) | 28 |
| 2020/C 390/40 | Case T-596/18: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — ZL v EUIPO (Civil service — Recruitment — Notice of competition — Decision not to place the applicant’s name on the reserve list for the competition — Obligation to state reasons — Rejection of the request for access to the multiple-choice questions asked in the admission tests — Secrecy of the selection board’s proceedings) | 29 |
| 2020/C 390/41 | Case T-291/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Pshonka v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection) | 29 |
| 2020/C 390/42 | Case T-292/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Pshonka v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection) | 30 |
| 2020/C 390/43 | Case T-338/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — UE v Commission (Civil service — Temporary members of staff — Health problems alleged to have been caused by working conditions — Request for recognition of an occupational disease — Article 73 of the Staff Regulations — Right to be heard — Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Obligation for the person concerned to be heard before the original decision) | 31 |
| 2020/C 390/44 | Case T-370/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Spain v Commission (External relations — Technical cooperation — Electronic communications — Regulation (EU) 2018/1971 — Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications — Article 35(2) of Regulation 2018/1971 — Participation of regulatory authorities of third countries in that body — Participation of the national regulatory authority of Kosovo — Concept of third country — Error of law) | 31 |
| 2020/C 390/45 | Case T-472/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — BASF v Commission (Medicinal products for human use — Marketing authorisation for medicinal products for human use containing omega-3 acid ethyl esters — Variation of the terms of the authorisation — First paragraph of Article 116 of Directive 2001/83/EC — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality) | 32 |
| 2020/C 390/46 | Case T-522/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Aldi v EUIPO (BBQ BARBECUE SEASON) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark BBQ BARBECUE SEASON — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) | 32 |
| 2020/C 390/47 | Case T-549/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Medac Gesellschaft für klinische Spezialpräparate v Commission (Medicinal products for human use — Orphan medicinal products — Application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Trecondi-treosulfan — Decision to remove a medicinal product from the Register of Orphan Medicinal Products — Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 — Concept of ‘satisfactory method’ — Article 5(12)(b) of Regulation No 141/2000 — Error of law) | 33 |
| 2020/C 390/48 | Case T-557/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Seven v EUIPO (7Seven) (EU trade mark — EU figurative mark 7Seven — No request for renewal of the registration of the trade mark — Cancellation of the mark on expiry of the registration — Article 53 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Application for restitutio in integrum submitted by a licensee — Article 104(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Duty of due care) | 34 |
| 2020/C 390/49 | Case T-654/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — FF v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products — Directive 2014/40/EU — Use of a photograph in a library of warnings with pictures to be used for tobacco products — Directive 2014/109/EU — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals) | 34 |
| 2020/C 390/50 | Case T-727/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Basaglia v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents concerning certain projects in the context of the eTEN programme and of the fifth and sixth framework programmes for research and technological development — Restriction of the request for access — Partial refusal to grant access — Exception relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual — Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party — Overriding public interest — Obligation to carry out a specific and individual examination) | 35 |
| 2020/C 390/51 | Case T-737/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Huevos Herrera Mejías v EUIPO — Montesierra (MontiSierra HUEVOS CON SABOR A CAMPO) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark MontiSierra HUEVOS CON SABOR A CAMPO — Earlier EU and national word marks MONTESIERRA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity between goods — Similarity between signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons) | 36 |
| 2020/C 390/52 | Case T-738/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Clouds Sky v EUIPOEUIPO — The Cloud Networks (Wi-Fi Powered by The Cloud) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark Wi-Fi Powered by The Cloud — Absolute grounds for refusal — Distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — No descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001)) | 36 |
| 2020/C 390/53 | Case T-869/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Tetra v EUIPO — Neusta next (Wave) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark Wave — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) | 37 |
| 2020/C 390/54 | Case T-835/19: Order of the General Court of 30 September 2020 — CrossFit v EUIPO — Hochwarter (CROSSBOX) (EU trade mark — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate) | 37 |
| 2020/C 390/55 | Case T-525/20: Action brought on 14 August 2020 — ITD and Danske Fragtmænd v Commission | 38 |
| 2020/C 390/56 | Case T-557/20: Action brought on 1st September 2020 — SRB v EDPS | 39 |
| 2020/C 390/57 | Case T-584/20: Action brought on 15 September 2020 — Cara Therapeutics v EUIPO — Gebro Holding (KORSUVA) | 40 |
| 2020/C 390/58 | Case T-591/20: Action brought on 28 September 2020 — Unimax Stationery v EUIPO — Mitsubishi Pencil (UNI-MAX) | 40 |
| 2020/C 390/59 | Case T-592/20: Action brought on 28 September 2020 — Univers Agro v EUIPO — Shandong Hengfeng Rubber & Plastic (AGATE) | 41 |
| 2020/C 390/60 | Case T-597/20: Action brought on 29 September 2020 — Roller v EUIPO — Flex Equipos de Descanso (Dormillo) | 42 |
| 2020/C 390/61 | Case T-598/20: Action brought on 29 September 2020 — Skechers USA v EUIPO (ARCH FIT) | 43 |
| 2020/C 390/62 | Case T-604/20: Action brought on 30 September 2020 — Guangdong Haomei New Materials and Guangdong King Metal Light Alloy Technology v Commission | 43 |
| 2020/C 390/63 | Case T-610/10: Action brought on 2 October 2020 — Egis Bâtiments International and InCA v Parliament | 45 |
| 2020/C 390/64 | Case T-612/20: Action brought on 4 October 2020 — Malacalza Investimenti v ECB | 47 |
| 2020/C 390/65 | Case T-613/20: Action brought on 3 October 2020 — Junqueras i Vies v Parliament | 48 |
| 2020/C 390/66 | Case T-615/20: Action brought on 3 October 2020 — Mood Media Netherlands v EUIPO — Tailoradio (MOOD MEDIA) | 49 |
| 2020/C 390/67 | Case T-620/20: Action brought on 5 October 2020 — Alessio and Others v ECB | 50 |
| 2020/C 390/68 | Case T-251/16: Order of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Director-General of OLAF v Commission | 51 |
| 2020/C 390/69 | Case T-13/19: Order of the General Court of 30 September 2020 — Czech Republic v Commission | 51 |
| 2020/C 390/70 | Case T-523/19: Order of the General Court of 28 September 2020 — Sky v EUIPO — Safran Electronics & Defense (SKYNAUTE by SAGEM) | 51 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2020/C 390/02

Joined Cases C-449/18 P and C-474/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 September 2020 — European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v Lionel Andrés Messi Cuccittini, J.M.-E.V. e hijos SRL (C-449/18 P) and J.M.-E.V. e hijos SRL v Lionel Andrés Messi Cuccittini, European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (C-474/18 P) (Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark MESSI — Earlier EU word marks MASSI — Partial refusal of registration)

2

2020/C 390/03

Case C-594/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 September 2020 — Republic of Austria v European Commission and Others (Appeal — State aid — Article 107(3)(c) TFEU — Articles 11 and 194 TFEU — Article 1, Article 2(c) and Article 106a(3) of the Euratom Treaty — Planned aid for Hinkley Point C nuclear power station (United Kingdom) — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market — Objective of common interest — Environmental objectives of the European Union — Principle of protection of the environment, ‘polluter pays’ principle, precautionary principle and principle of sustainability — Determination of the economic activity concerned — Market failure — Proportionality of the aid — Operating or investment aid — Determination of the aid elements — Guarantee Notice)

3

2020/C 390/04

Case C-648/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul București — Romania) — Autoritatea națională de reglementare în domeniul energiei (ANRE) v Societatea de Producere a Energiei Electrice în Hidrocentrale Hidroelectrica SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Internal market in electricity — Free movement of goods — Article 35 TFEU — Quantitative restrictions on exports — Measures having equivalent effect — National measure requiring electricity producers to offer for sale all the electricity available to them exclusively on a centralised competitive market of the Member State concerned)

3

2020/C 390/05

Joined Cases C-724/18 and C-727/18: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 September 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — Cali Apartments SCI (C-724/18) and HX (C-727/18) v Procureur général près la cour d’appel de Paris and Ville de Paris (References for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2006/123/EC — Scope — Repeated short-term letting of furnished premises to a transient clientele which does not take up residence there — National legislation imposing a prior authorisation scheme for certain specific municipalities and making those municipalities responsible for defining the conditions for granting the authorisations provided for by that scheme — Article 4(6) — Concept of ‘authorisation scheme’ — Article 9 — Justification — Insufficient supply of affordable long-term rental housing — Proportionality — Article 10 — Requirements relating to the conditions for granting authorisations)

4

2020/C 390/06

Case C-806/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Criminal proceedings against JZ (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Return of illegally staying third-country nationals — Directive 2008/115/EC — Article 11 — Entry ban — Third-country national against whom an entry ban was issued but who never left the Member State concerned — National legislation providing for a custodial sentence in the event of the third-country national staying in that Member State despite notice of the entry ban issued against him)

5

2020/C 390/07

Joined Cases C-807/18 and C-39/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 September 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — Telenor Magyarország Zrt. v Nemzeti Média- és Hírközlési Hatóság Elnöke (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Electronic communications — Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 — Article 3 — Open internet access — Article 3(1) — Rights of end users — Right to access applications and services and to use them — Right to provide applications and services — Article 3(2) — Prohibition of agreements and commercial practices limiting the exercise of end users’ rights — Concepts of ‘agreements’, ‘commercial practices’, ‘end users’ and ‘consumers’ — Assessment of whether the exercise of end users’ rights is limited — Detailed rules — Article 3(3) — Obligation of equal and non-discriminatory treatment of traffic — Possibility of implementing reasonable traffic-management measures — Prohibition of measures blocking and slowing down traffic — Exceptions — Commercial practices consisting in offering packages which provide (i) that customers subscribing to them purchase a tariff entitling them to use a given data volume without restriction, without any deduction being made from that volume for using certain specific applications and services covered by ‘a zero tariff’ and (ii) that once the data volume has been used up, those customers may continue to use those specific applications and services without restriction, while measures blocking or slowing down traffic are applied to the other applications and services)

6

2020/C 390/08

Case C-12/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 September 2020 — Mylène Troszczynski v European Parliament (Appeal — Law governing the institutions — Member of the European Parliament — Protocol on the privileges and immunities of the European Union — Article 8 — Parliamentary immunity — Activity not connected to parliamentary duties — Publication on the Member’s Twitter account — Article 9 — Parliamentary privilege — Scope — Decision to waive parliamentary immunity)

7

2020/C 390/09

Case C-121/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 September 2020 — Edison SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (Appeal — EU trade mark — Application for registration of a figurative mark including the word element EDISON — Interpretation of the terms in the heading of a class of the Nice Classification and in the accompanying alphabetical list)

7

2020/C 390/10

Case C-122/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 September 2020 — Hamas v Council of the European Union, French Republic, European Commission (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Fight against terrorism — Restrictive measures taken against certain persons and entities — Freezing of funds — Common Position 2001/931/CFSP — Article 1(4) and (6) — Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 — Article 2(3) — Retention of an organisation on the list of persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts — Conditions — Competent authority equivalent to a judicial authority — Sentencing decision — Ongoing risk of involvement in terrorist activities — Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds — Obligation to state reasons — Right to effective judicial protection)

8

2020/C 390/11

Case C-312/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas — Lithuania) — XT v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2006/112/EC — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Article 9(1) — Article 193 — Concept of ‘taxable person’ — Joint activity agreement — Partnership — Allocation of an economic transaction to one of the partners — Determination of the taxable person liable for the tax)

8

2020/C 390/12

Case C-339/19: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție — Romania) — SC Romenergo SA, Aris Capital SA v Autoritatea de Supraveghere Financiară (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Free movement of capital — Company law — Shares admitted to trading on the regulated market — Financial investment company — National regulations limiting the shareholding in certain financial investment companies — Statutory presumption of concerted action)

9

2020/C 390/13

Case C-363/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Patent- och marknadsdomstolen vid Stockholms tingsrätt — Sweden) — Konsumentombudsmannen v Mezina AB (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Food safety — Nutritional and health claims concerning foodstuffs — Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 — Articles 5 and 6 — Scientific substantiation for claims — Generally accepted scientific evidence — Article 10(1) — Article 28(5) — Transitional arrangements — Unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market — Directive 2005/29/EC — Article 3(4) — Relationship between the provisions of Directive 2005/29 and other EU rules regulating specific aspects of unfair commercial practices)

10

2020/C 390/14

Case C-367/19: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Državna revizijska komisija za revizijo postopkov oddaje javnih naročil — Slovenia) — Tax-Fin-Lex d.o.o. v Ministrstvo za notranje zadeve (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public service contracts — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 2(1)(5) — Concept of ‘public contract’ — Concept of ‘contract for pecuniary interest’ — Tenderer’s bid at a price of EUR 0.00 — Rejection of the tender — Article 69 — Abnormally low tender)

11

2020/C 390/15

Case C-386/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 September 2020 — Hamas v Council of the European Union, European Commission (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Fight against terrorism — Restrictive measures taken against certain persons and entities — Freezing of funds — Common Position 2001/931/CFSP — Article 1(4) and (6) — Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 — Article 2(3) — Retention of an organisation on the list of persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts — Conditions — Competent authority equivalent to a judicial authority — Sentencing decision — Ongoing risk of involvement in terrorist activities — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection)

11

2020/C 390/16

Case C-462/19: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Comisión Nacional de los Mercados y la Competencia — Spain) — proceedings against Asociación Nacional de Empresas Estibadoras y Consignatarios de Buques (Anesco), Comisiones Obreras, Coordinadora Estatal de Trabajadores del Mar (CETM), Confederación Intersindical Gallega, Eusko Langileen Alkartasuna, Langile Abertzaleen Batzordeak, Unión General de Trabajadores (UGT) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Meaning of ‘court or tribunal’ for the purposes of Article 267 TFEU — Criteria — Comisión Nacional de los Mercados y la Competencia (National Commission on Markets and Competition, Spain) — Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)

12

2020/C 390/17

Case C-498/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 September 2020 — Romania v European Commission (Appeal — European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF), the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) — Decision of the European Commission excluding expenditure from EU financing — Notification to the addressee — Error in the printing of the annex — Publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union — Time limit for filing appeal — Point from which time starts to run — Lateness — Principle of legal certainty — Observance of the adversarial principle)

13

2020/C 390/18

Case C-509/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht München — Germany) — BMW Bayerische Motorenwerke AG v Hauptzollamt München (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs Union — Union Customs Code — Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 — Article 71(1)(b) — Customs value — Imports of electronic products equipped with software)

13

2020/C 390/19

Case C-528/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Mitteldeutsche Hartstein-Industrie AG v Finanzamt Y (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC — Article 17(2)(a) — Deduction of input tax — Origin and scope of the right to deduct — Extension of a road belonging to a municipality — Entry in the accounts of the costs incurred by the works as part of the taxable person’s general costs — Determination of the existence of a direct and immediate link with the economic activity of the taxable person — Supply made free of charge — Supply to be treated as a supply made for consideration — Article 5(6))

14

2020/C 390/20

Case C-669/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 September 2020 — BP v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (Appeal — Non-contractual liability — Access to documents — Protection of personal data — Allegedly irregular disclosure of such data — Regulations (EC) No 1049/2001 and No 45/2001 — Admissibility of pleas and offers of evidence before the General Court of the European Union — Allocation of costs)

15

2020/C 390/21

Case C-674/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas — Lithuania) — ‘Skonis ir kvapas’ UAB v Muitinės departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Structure and rates of excise duty applied to manufactured tobacco — Directive 2011/64/EU — Article 2(2) — Article 5(1) — Concept of ‘Products consisting in whole or in part of substances other than tobacco’ — Concept of ‘Smoking tobacco’ — Water-pipe tobacco)

15

2020/C 390/22

Case C-738/19: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam — Netherlands) — A v B, C (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Annex, point 1(e) — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Social housing — Obligation of residence and prohibition on subletting the property — Article 3(1) and (3) — Article 4(1) — Assessment of whether penalty clauses are unfair — Criteria)

16

2020/C 390/23

Case C-89/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Županijski sud u Puli (Croatia) lodged on 20 February 2020 — criminal proceedings against GR, HS, IT, and INTER CONSULTING d.o.o., in liquidation

16

2020/C 390/24

Case C-113/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky (Slovakia) lodged on 28 February 2020 — Slovenský plynárenský priemysel, a.s. v Finančné riaditel’stvo Slovenskej republiky

17

2020/C 390/25

Case C-239/20 P: Appeal brought on 5 June 2020 by Giorgio Armani SpA against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 26 March 2020 in Case T-653/18, Armani v EUIPO

17

2020/C 390/26

Case C-240/20 P: Appeal brought on 5 June 2020 by Giorgio Armani SpA against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 26 March 2020 in Case T-654/18, Armani v EUIPO

18

2020/C 390/27

Case C-360/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from Tribunalul Argeș (Romania) lodged on 4 August 2020 — Ministerul Dezvoltării Regionale și Administrației Publice v NE

18

2020/C 390/28

Case C-365/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 4 August 2020 — Eurowings GmbH v GDVI Verbraucherhilfe GmbH

19

2020/C 390/29

Case C-370/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 7 August 2020 — Pro Rauchfrei e.V. v JS e.K.

20

2020/C 390/30

Case C-376/20 P: Appeal brought on 7 August 2020 by European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 28 May 2020 in Case T-399/16, CK Telecoms UK Investments Ltd v Commission

20

2020/C 390/31

Case C-414/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 4 September 2020 — Criminal proceedings against MM

22

2020/C 390/32

Case C-416/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 7 September 2020 — TR

22

2020/C 390/33

Case C-431/20 P: Appeal brought on 12 September 2020 by Carlo Tognoli and Others against the order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 3 July 2020 in Joined Cases T-395/19, T-396/19, T-405/19, T-408/19, T-419/19, T-423/19, T-424/19, T-428/19, T-433/19, T-437/19, T-443/19, T-455/19, T-458/19 to T-462/19, T-464/19, T-469/19 and T-477/19, Tognoli and Others v Parliament

23

2020/C 390/34

Case C-432/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 14 September 2020 — ZK

24

General Court

2020/C 390/35

Case T-796/16: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — CEDC International v EUIPO — Underberg (Shape of a blade of grass in a bottle) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for an EU three-dimensional mark — Shape of a blade of grass in a bottle — Earlier three-dimensional national mark — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 15(1) and Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 18(1) and Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Nature of use — Alteration of distinctive character — Use in conjunction with other marks — Scope of the protection — Requirement for clarity and precision — Requirement for the description and the representation to align with one another — Decision taken following annulment of an earlier decision by the General Court — Reference to the grounds of an earlier annulled decision — Obligation to state reasons)

25

2020/C 390/36

Case T-411/17: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Landesbank Baden-Württemberg v SRB (Economic and monetary union — Banking union — Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) — Single Resolution Fund (SRF) — Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2017 ex ante contributions — Action for annulment — Direct and individual concern — Admissibility — Essential procedural requirements — Authentication of the decision — Obligation to state reasons — Right to effective judicial protection — Plea of illegality — Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment)

26

2020/C 390/37

Case T-414/17: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Hypo Vorarlberg Bank v SRB (Economic and monetary union — Banking union — Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) — Single Resolution Fund (SRF) — Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2017 ex ante contributions — Action for annulment — Direct and individual concern — Admissibility — Essential procedural requirements — Authentication of the decision — Obligation to state reasons — Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment)

27

2020/C 390/38

Case T-420/17: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Portigon v SRB (Economic and monetary union — Banking union — Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) — Single Resolution Fund (SRF) — Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2017 ex ante contributions — Action for annulment — Direct and individual concern — Admissibility — Essential procedural requirements — Authentication of the decision — Obligation to state reasons — Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment)

27

2020/C 390/39

Case T-565/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — P. Krücken Organic v Commission (Institutional law — Action for damages — Conditions in which the European Union incurs non-contractual liability — Arrangements for imports of organic products from third countries — Private inspection body — Concept of appropriate supervision within the meaning of Article 33(3) of Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 — Regulation (EC) No 1235/2008 — Attributability of conduct)

28

2020/C 390/40

Case T-596/18: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — ZL v EUIPO (Civil service — Recruitment — Notice of competition — Decision not to place the applicant’s name on the reserve list for the competition — Obligation to state reasons — Rejection of the request for access to the multiple-choice questions asked in the admission tests — Secrecy of the selection board’s proceedings)

29

2020/C 390/41

Case T-291/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Pshonka v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection)

29

2020/C 390/42

Case T-292/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Pshonka v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection)

30

2020/C 390/43

Case T-338/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — UE v Commission (Civil service — Temporary members of staff — Health problems alleged to have been caused by working conditions — Request for recognition of an occupational disease — Article 73 of the Staff Regulations — Right to be heard — Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Obligation for the person concerned to be heard before the original decision)

31

2020/C 390/44

Case T-370/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Spain v Commission (External relations — Technical cooperation — Electronic communications — Regulation (EU) 2018/1971 — Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications — Article 35(2) of Regulation 2018/1971 — Participation of regulatory authorities of third countries in that body — Participation of the national regulatory authority of Kosovo — Concept of third country — Error of law)

31

2020/C 390/45

Case T-472/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — BASF v Commission (Medicinal products for human use — Marketing authorisation for medicinal products for human use containing omega-3 acid ethyl esters — Variation of the terms of the authorisation — First paragraph of Article 116 of Directive 2001/83/EC — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality)

32

2020/C 390/46

Case T-522/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Aldi v EUIPO (BBQ BARBECUE SEASON) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark BBQ BARBECUE SEASON — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)

32

2020/C 390/47

Case T-549/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Medac Gesellschaft für klinische Spezialpräparate v Commission (Medicinal products for human use — Orphan medicinal products — Application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Trecondi-treosulfan — Decision to remove a medicinal product from the Register of Orphan Medicinal Products — Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 — Concept of ‘satisfactory method’ — Article 5(12)(b) of Regulation No 141/2000 — Error of law)

33

2020/C 390/48

Case T-557/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Seven v EUIPO (7Seven) (EU trade mark — EU figurative mark 7Seven — No request for renewal of the registration of the trade mark — Cancellation of the mark on expiry of the registration — Article 53 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Application for restitutio in integrum submitted by a licensee — Article 104(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Duty of due care)

34

2020/C 390/49

Case T-654/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — FF v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products — Directive 2014/40/EU — Use of a photograph in a library of warnings with pictures to be used for tobacco products — Directive 2014/109/EU — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals)

34

2020/C 390/50

Case T-727/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Basaglia v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents concerning certain projects in the context of the eTEN programme and of the fifth and sixth framework programmes for research and technological development — Restriction of the request for access — Partial refusal to grant access — Exception relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual — Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party — Overriding public interest — Obligation to carry out a specific and individual examination)

35

2020/C 390/51

Case T-737/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Huevos Herrera Mejías v EUIPO — Montesierra (MontiSierra HUEVOS CON SABOR A CAMPO) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark MontiSierra HUEVOS CON SABOR A CAMPO — Earlier EU and national word marks MONTESIERRA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity between goods — Similarity between signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons)

36

2020/C 390/52

Case T-738/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Clouds Sky v EUIPOEUIPO — The Cloud Networks (Wi-Fi Powered by The Cloud) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark Wi-Fi Powered by The Cloud — Absolute grounds for refusal — Distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — No descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001))

36

2020/C 390/53

Case T-869/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Tetra v EUIPO — Neusta next (Wave) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark Wave — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

37

2020/C 390/54

Case T-835/19: Order of the General Court of 30 September 2020 — CrossFit v EUIPO — Hochwarter (CROSSBOX) (EU trade mark — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)

37

2020/C 390/55

Case T-525/20: Action brought on 14 August 2020 — ITD and Danske Fragtmænd v Commission

38

2020/C 390/56

Case T-557/20: Action brought on 1st September 2020 — SRB v EDPS

st

39

2020/C 390/57

Case T-584/20: Action brought on 15 September 2020 — Cara Therapeutics v EUIPO — Gebro Holding (KORSUVA)

40

2020/C 390/58

Case T-591/20: Action brought on 28 September 2020 — Unimax Stationery v EUIPO — Mitsubishi Pencil (UNI-MAX)

40

2020/C 390/59

Case T-592/20: Action brought on 28 September 2020 — Univers Agro v EUIPO — Shandong Hengfeng Rubber & Plastic (AGATE)

41

2020/C 390/60

Case T-597/20: Action brought on 29 September 2020 — Roller v EUIPO — Flex Equipos de Descanso (Dormillo)

42

2020/C 390/61

Case T-598/20: Action brought on 29 September 2020 — Skechers USA v EUIPO (ARCH FIT)

43

2020/C 390/62

Case T-604/20: Action brought on 30 September 2020 — Guangdong Haomei New Materials and Guangdong King Metal Light Alloy Technology v Commission

43

2020/C 390/63

Case T-610/10: Action brought on 2 October 2020 — Egis Bâtiments International and InCA v Parliament

45

2020/C 390/64

Case T-612/20: Action brought on 4 October 2020 — Malacalza Investimenti v ECB

47

2020/C 390/65

Case T-613/20: Action brought on 3 October 2020 — Junqueras i Vies v Parliament

48

2020/C 390/66

Case T-615/20: Action brought on 3 October 2020 — Mood Media Netherlands v EUIPO — Tailoradio (MOOD MEDIA)

49

2020/C 390/67

Case T-620/20: Action brought on 5 October 2020 — Alessio and Others v ECB

50

2020/C 390/68

Case T-251/16: Order of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Director-General of OLAF v Commission

51

2020/C 390/69

Case T-13/19: Order of the General Court of 30 September 2020 — Czech Republic v Commission

51

2020/C 390/70

Case T-523/19: Order of the General Court of 28 September 2020 — Sky v EUIPO — Safran Electronics & Defense (SKYNAUTE by SAGEM)

51

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN