alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) or RULE 15d-14(a),
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, William J. Hemelt, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary of Matrixx Initiatives, Inc., certify that: 1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Matrixx Initiatives,
Inc.; 2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.     The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)     designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)     disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and 5.     The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)     all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.Date: May 14, 2004 /s/ William J. HemeltWilliam J. HemeltExecutive Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer, Treasurer and Secretary
 29
#### Arnaldo RAVELO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS), Randall Akins, Kendall Field Office, United States Department of Homeland Security, Jeh Johnson, Secretary, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-10337

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(December 13, 2017)

*650Eduardo Rigoberto Soto, Anthony Richard Dominguez, Eduardo Soto *&*Associates, Coral Gables, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant

Troy David Liggett, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Jessica Elise Elliott, Wifredo A, Ferrer, Emily M. Smachetti, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Defendants-Appellees

Before HULL, DUBINA, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI,* Judge.

*

 Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff-Appellant Arnaldo Ravelo brought this civil action under 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. and 28 U.S.C. § 1331. After review and with the benefit of oral argument, this Court concludes that Ravelo has not shown any reversible error in the district court’s final judgment and order dated November 30, 2016. Thus, we affirm the district court’s decision for the reasons already outlined in the district court’s order.1

AFFIRMED.

1

. This Court sua sponte has considered its jurisdiction and concludes that, based on the record and the narrow issue Of statutory ineligibility for adjustment of status to that of a lawful' permanent resident, we have subject matter jurisdiction in this case. See Perez v. U.S. Bureau of Citizenship & Immigration Servs., 774 F.3d 960, 965-66 (11th Cir. 2014); Mejia Rodriguez v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 562 F.3d 1137, 1142-43 (11th Cir. 2009).
#### UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Tracy J. YOST Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-2510

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: November 15, 2017

Filed: November 30, 2017

Teresa Ann Moore, Assistant U.S, Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Kansas City, MO, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Robert Kuchar, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Kansas City, MO, for Defendant-Appellant

Tracy J. Yost, Pro Se

Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Tracy Yost appeals the district court’s1 order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence modification based on Amendment 801 to the Guidelines.

Having reviewed the record, we affirm on the basis of the district court’s statement in footnote 4 of its order, which indicated that even if Amendment 801 were to be given retroactive effect, the court would decline to modify Yost’s sentence, because — consistent with the court’s explanation at the time of Yost’s sentencing — the court viewed the sentence as appropriate after considering the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (setting forth circumstances under which court may reduce defendant’s prison term); see also Spirtas Co. v. Nautilus Ins. Co., 715 F.3d 667, 670-71 (8th Cir. 2013) (this court may affirm on any basis supported by record); cf. United States v. Hansen, 859 F.3d 576, 577-78 (8th Cir. 2017) (on direct appeal, affirming sentence that was inconsistent with Amendment 801; concluding that any error would have been harmless in light of district court’s explanation of sentence imposed). We express no opinion as to the other aspects of *453the district court’s order. The denial of relief is affirmed.

1

. The Honorable Stephen R. Bough, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
Order entered November 10 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 00533
- CR RAMIRO PAYAN, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F09
- 72851
- Y



### O RDER
The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the
trial court shal l conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective repr esentation, which may include appointment of new counsel.We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
(logo) LNR

Partners, LLC

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

OF

 

LNR PARTNERS, LLC

 

 

The undersigned, Job Warshaw, being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the "Special Servicer"), as special servicer under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule I hereto, hereby certifies, subject to any limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an authorized officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:

 

1. A review of the activities performed by the Special Servicer during the period commencing on January 1, 2015 and ending on December 31, 2015 (or any other shorter period set forth on Schedule I hereto) (the “Reporting Period”), and of the Special Servicer's performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review mid using the applicable servicing criteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Repo1iing Period.

 

 

LNR PARTNERS, LLC,

a Florida limited liability company

 

 

/s/ Job Warshaw

By: Job Warshaw

President

 

 

Dated: February 23, 2016

 

 

1601 Washington Avenue · Suite 700 · Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164

Telephone: (305) 695-5600 · Fax: (305) 695-5601

 

 

Schedule I

 

COMM 2014-LC17

COMM 2014-LC17 Mortgage Trust Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates

 

 

Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation 

c/o Cadwalader, Wickersham& Taft LLP

200 Liberty Street 

New York NY 10281 

Anna H. Glick

 

 

Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation 

60 Wall Street

New York NY 10005 

Lainie Kaye

 

 

Park Bridge Lender Services LLC 

Att: COMM 2014-LC17

560 Lexington Avenue, 17th Floor 

New York NY 10022

Group

 

 

Park Bridge Lender Services LLC 

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

200 Liberty Street 

New York NY 10281 

Patrick T. Quinn

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 

9062 Old Annapolis Road 

Columbia MD 21045 

Group Notices

 

 

Wilmington Trust, National Association 

1100 North Market Street

Wilmington DE 19890 

E Soriano
EXHIBIT 31



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED



I, Joseph R. Rozelle, certify that:



1.   I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Global Growth Corporation;



2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  February 15, 2010



/s/    Joseph R. Rozelle

------------------------------------

Joseph R. Rozelle

Principal Executive Officer

and Principal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30,1997 (UNAUDITED) AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       7,464,989
<SECURITIES>                                 1,990,525
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,694,018
<PP&E>                                         587,968<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,907,099
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,747,692
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,493
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,151,825
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,907,099
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,523,002
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,495
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (5,211,199)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (5,211,199)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (5,211,199)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.80)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.80)
<FN>
<F1>PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT IS REPORTED NET OF ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION OF
$1,187,505.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, David R. Wells, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Powerhouse
Technologies Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: August 15, 2005

/s/ David R. Wells
-------------------------
David R. Wells
Vice President, Finance
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
### 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

EGU BART 19,621 22,344 25,152 30,214 31,611 38,586 38,586 38,586 38,586 38,586 38,586 38,586 38,586 38,586



### Non-EGU BART 2,952 2,952 2,952 2,952 2,952 3,464 4,201 4,201 4,201 4,201 4,201 4,201 4,201 4,201



### Long Term Strategy (LTS)

- - - - - - 4,494 8,988 11,034 11,034 11,034 11,034 15,528 20,022



### EGU BART & LTS Total 19,621 22,344 25,152 30,214 31,611 38,586 43,080 47,574 49,620 49,620 49,620 49,620 54,114 58,608



### Total BART & LTS 22,573 25,296 28,104 33,166 34,563 42,050 47,281 51,775 53,821 53,821 53,821 53,821 58,315 62,809 

### 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 

### 50,000 60,000 70,000 

# NO

x 

# Emission Reductions (tons)

Long Term Strategy

Non-EGU BART

EGU BART
#### Janice Wolk GRENADIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James C. CLARK, Judge, in his Personal and Professional Capacity, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-1807

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 30, 2018

Decided: February 1, 2018

Janice Wolk Grenadier, Appellant Pro Se. Margeaux Showell Serrano, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Janice Wolk Grenadier appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her suit against a state judge and denying various motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Grenadier v. Clark,*No. 1:17-cv-00280-CMH-JFA (E.D. Va. Apr. 21, 2017; May 23, 2017; June 2 *&*23, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts’and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
No. 11-9858.

#### McCune *v.*Ludwick, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# L_2006084EN.01006001.xml

| 23.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 84/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 84/60

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2032/2003 of 4 November 2003 on the second phase of the 10-year work programme referred to in Article 16(2) of Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1896/2000

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 307 of 24 November 2003
  )

On page 32, in Annex I, against the entry ‘5-chloro-2-(4-chlorphenoxy)-phenol’, in the second column headed ‘EC number’:

for:

‘418-890-8’,

read:

‘429-290-0’.

---
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 413/2005

of 11 March 2005         

fixing the maximum aid for concentrated butter for the 331st special invitation to tender opened under the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EEC) No 429/90

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 10 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 331st tender under the standing invitation to tender opened by Regulation (EEC) No 429/90 the maximum aid and the end-use security are fixed as follows:

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 12 March 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 March 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

(2)OJ L 45, 21.2.1990, p. 8. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2250/2004 (OJ L 381, 28.12.2004, p. 25).

----
**EXHIBIT ITEM 32.1**

 

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

 

Thecertification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and ExchangeCommission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63of Title 18 of the United States Code.

 

August 11, 2003

 

Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr.,the Chief Executive Officer of Northern California Bancorp, Inc. certifies:

 

1.                  thatthis periodic report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                  thatinformation contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of NorthernCalifornia Bancorp, Inc..

 

 
|   | /s/ Charles  T. Chrietzberg, Jr.   |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Charles T.  Chrietzberg, Jr.            |
|   | Chief Executive  Officer  and President |

 

1

----