alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 298

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing deepest condolences to the State and

the fires.firefighters from across the Nation in battlingthe fires, and commending the heroic efforts ofpeople of Florida as they overcome the effects ofJuly 1998, expressing support to the State andsult of the wild land fires occurring in June andpeople of Florida for the losses suffered as a re-
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 298

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas during June and July 1998, wild land fires destroyed approximately 500,000 acres of land in northeast

and central Florida, having an aggregate value of more

than $276,000,000;

Whereas the fires have affected 67 counties in the State of

Florida;
2

•HCON 298 EH

Whereas the President of the United States issued a major

disaster declaration for the State of Florida;

Whereas the fires have damaged at least 367 homes and 33

businesses;

Whereas the fires have caused business closures and have aggravated drought conditions, which will have a long-term

impact on the economy of the region;

Whereas the fires have caused injuries to at least 95 people,

the majority of whom are firefighters;

Whereas approximately 7,000 firefighters from 46 States

have braved extreme conditions to assist firefighters in

Florida in fighting the fires;

Whereas many agencies of or established by the Federal Government, including the Federal Emergency Management

Agency, the Forest Service, the Department of Defense,

the Department of Transportation, AmeriCorps, the

Small Business Administration, the General Services Administration, the National Guard, the American National

Red Cross, and the Civil Air Patrol, have contributed

vital support functions in response to the fires; and

Whereas many State and local government agencies have also

contributed vital support functions in response to the

fires: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) expresses deepest condolences to the State

4 and people of Florida for the losses suffered as a re5 sult of the wild land fires occurring in June and

6 July 1998;
3

•HCON 298 EH

1 (2) expresses support to the State and people of

2 Florida as they overcome the effects of the fires;

3 (3) commends the heroic efforts of firefighters

4 from across the Nation in battling the fires; and

5 (4) commends the many agencies of or estab6 lished by the Federal Government and the many

7 State and local government agencies that have con8 tributed vital support functions in response to the

9 fires.

Passed the House of Representatives July 20, 1998.

Attest:

Clerk.
EX-10.1



 EXHIBIT 10.1 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 

NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC. 2015 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 

This First Amendment (this “Amendment”) to the Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the
“Plan”) is made and adopted by Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. (the “Company”), a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands. 

 

	 	1.	Section 3(a) of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows: 

 “(a) Shares Available for
Awards. The maximum number of Shares that may be issued or delivered pursuant to Awards under the Plan shall be 20,000,000. Provided that the Plan is timely approved by the shareholders of the Company in accordance with Section 1(d), all of
such Shares may be granted with respect to Incentive Stock Options. Shares issued or delivered pursuant to an Award may be authorized but unissued Shares, treasury Shares, including Shares purchased in the open market, or a combination of the
foregoing. The aggregate number of Shares available for issuance or delivery under the Plan shall be subject to adjustment as provided in Section 14.” 
  

	 	2.	This Amendment is effective as of December 12, 2017. 

  

	 	3.	This Amendment shall be and is hereby incorporated in and forms a part of the Plan. All other terms and provisions of the Plan shall remain unchanged except as specifically modified herein. The Plan, as amended by this
Amendment, is hereby ratified and confirmed. 


*            *           
 *            * 
 I hereby certify that the foregoing
Amendment was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company on December 7, 2017. 
  

			
	NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Angeliki Frangou

	Name:	 	Angeliki Frangou
	Title:	 	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
#### Paul ADAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, J. Beard, Secretary, in his/her individual and official capacity; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-56224

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted November 15, 2017 *

Filed November 30, 2017

Paul Adams, Pro Se

Cassandra Jean Shryock, Esquire, AGCA — Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*718MEMORANDUM **

Paul Adams, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action following an order revoking his in forma pauperis (“IFP”) status. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). *Andrews v. King,*398 F.3d 1113, 1118 n.6 (9th Cir. 2005). We affirm.

The district court properly revoked Adams’s IFP status because at the time Adams filed the complaint, he had filed three actions that qualified as “strikes,” and he did not plausibly allege that he was “under imminent danger of serious physical injury” at the time he lodged the complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); *Andrews v. Cervantes,*493 F.3d 1047, 1053 (9th Cir. 2007) (discussing the imminent danger exception to § 1915(g)).

We reject as unsupported by the record Adams’s contention that he is entitled to default judgment.

We reject as without merit Adams’s contentions concerning fraud, leave to amend, and judicial bias.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
| (logo) WELLS   

           FARGO

  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor

550 South Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2014, by and among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator,  Wilmington Trust, National Association,  as Trustee, and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C24 (the "Agreement").  Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.              A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from October 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”),  and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2.              To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 6th day of March 2015.

                                                                                                

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

July 25, 2011

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with the Engine Manufacturers Association (EMA)

FROM: Angela Cullen

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

This memorandum documents a meeting held on June 30, 2011 between EMA and EPA and 

included the following individuals:

EMA: Tim Blubaugh - EMA, Jed Mandel – EMA, Tony Cook – Navistar, Patrick 

Charbonneau – Navistar, David Kayes – Daimler, Dan Kieffer – PACCAR, , Brian 

Mormino - Cummins, Jackie Yeager – Cummins, Tony Greszler – Volvo, Marc Miller –

Volvo, Brian Burton – Daimler, Jack Gehring – Caterpillar, Don Keski-Hynnila – Detroit 

Diesel

EPA: Byron Bunker, Chuck Moulis, Cle Jackson, and Angela Cullen

The discussion focused on the vehicle and engine certification process.
----

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions at its meeting on given at its 409th meeting on 15 May 2006 concerning a draft decision relating to Case COMP/F/38.645 — Methacrylates

(2006/C 285/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----
Placeholder: C onfidential Business I nformation item

Coolgas Inc. CBI Comment on 2 - 3 - 1 2 For more information please contact David Don aldson by phone at 202 - 343 - 9086 or by email at donaldson.david@epa.gov .
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              Jan-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                Mar-31-1997
<CASH>                                      127,213
<SECURITIES>                                985,713
<RECEIVABLES>                               115,783
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 67,841
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            1,371,082
<PP&E>                                      1,641,165
<DEPRECIATION>                              350,199
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              3,006,697
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       976,882
<BONDS>                                     0
<COMMON>                                    4,932
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                  1,886,826
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                3,006,697
<SALES>                                     606,857
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            667,691
<CGS>                                       358,656
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               1,470,297
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            1,098,673
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          12,968
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (802,606)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                (802,606)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (.16)
        
                                   

<PAGE>

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Angel LOPEZ-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-10044

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017*

Filed December 22, 2017

Susan B. Gray, J. Douglas Wilson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, DOJ-USAO, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Heather M. Angove, FPDCA — Federal Public Defenders Office, Northern District of California, San Jose, CA, for Defendant-Appellant

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Angel Lopez-Ramirez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 46-month sentence imposed following 'his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand for resentencing.

The government concedes, and we agree, that the district court plainly erred by failing to address Lopez-Ramirez personally to ask if he wanted to speak before sentencing. *See*Fed. R. Crim. P, 32(i)(4)(A)(ii); *United States v. Daniels,*760 F.3d 920, 925-26 (9th Cir. 2014). Accordingly, we vacate and remand for re-sentencing. *See Daniels,*760 F.3d at 926.

Lopez-Ramirez asks us to reach his other claims of error to provide the district court “guidance” on remand. We decline to do so because we do not know what sentencing arguments the parties will make on remand, how the court will respond to those arguments, or what sentence it will impose. *See United States v. Kaczynski,*551 F.3d 1120, 1124 (9th Cir. 2009) (declining to issue an advisory opinion based on speculation about possible future events).

VACATED and REMANDED for re-sentencing.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

ASTRAZENECA AB, ASTRAZENECA 

PHARMACEUTICALS LP,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., KINDEVA 

DRUG DELIVERY L.P.,

Defendants-Appellees

______________________

2023-1164

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of West Virginia in Nos. 1:18-cv-00193-

IMK-RWT, 1:19-cv-203-IMK-RWT, Judge Irene M. Keeley.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

 

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

The parties jointly move to remand the above-captioned appeal with each side to bear its own costs and fees.

Upon consideration thereof, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

Case: 23-1164 Document: 65 Page: 1 Filed: 03/07/2023
2 ASTRAZENECA AB v. MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.

The motion is granted.

March 7, 2023

 Date

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: March 7, 2023

Case: 23-1164 Document: 65 Page: 2 Filed: 03/07/2023
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 59 (Monday, March 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 17359]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06533]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of 
the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on Wednesday, March 
30, 2022 at 11:30 a.m.

PLACE: The meeting will be webcast on the Commission's website at 
www.sec.gov.

STATUS: This meeting will begin at 11:30 a.m. (ET) and will be open to 
the public via webcast on the Commission's website at www.sec.gov.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. The Commission will consider whether to 
propose amendments regarding special purpose acquisition companies, 
shell companies, the use of projections in Commission filings and a 
rule addressing the status of special purpose acquisition companies 
under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary 
at (202) 551-5400.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.)

    Dated: March 23, 2022.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-06533 Filed 3-24-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### Sundari K. PRASAD, f/k/a Aurealia N. Nelson, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DELTA SIGMA THETA SORORITY, INC., ETA Tau Chapter, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-7376

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 22, 2018

Decided: February 27, 2018

Sundari K. Prasad, Appellant Pro Se.

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sundari K. Prasad appeals the district court’s order dismissing as frivolous Pra-sad’s civil rights action against Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc., because the claims raised therein were barred by the *337applicable statutes of limitations.* On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. *See*4th Cir. R. 34(b). Prasad does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition in her informal brief. Thus, Prasad has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. *See Williams v. Giant Food Inc.,*370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*

*

 The district court dismissed this action after conducting frivolity review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2012).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF EMBASSY ACQUISITION FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE
30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         663,555
<SECURITIES>                                 6,716,268
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,447
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,381,270
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,389,742
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,408
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,389,742
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,087
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 48,321
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,430
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             31,891
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,891
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Equus Capital
Partners, L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September
30, 2002 (the "Report"), I, Nolan Lehmann, President and Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer of the Equus Capital Corporation, the Managing General
Partner, hereby certify that:

     (3)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d)); and

     (4)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Partnership.


                                           /s/ Nolan Lehmann
Dated:  November 14, 2002                  -------------------------------------
                                           Nolan Lehmann
                                           President
                                           Principal Financial and Accounting
                                           Officer of Equus Capital Corporation
                                           Managing General Partner
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7089

ELIJAH JEROME WHITE, Petitioner – Appellant,

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; M. RIVERA, Warden, Respondents – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (3:08-cv-03681-PMD)

Submitted: October 20, 2009 Decided: October 26, 2009

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elijah Jerome White, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Elijah Jerome White, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition, and a subsequent order denying his motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. White v. United States , No. 3:08-cv03681-PMD (D.S.C. May 21, 2009 & June 8, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID** 

### 07651 **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  

### 07651\07651_ Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 07651\07651_ HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted 

### x 07651\07651_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook 

### x 07651\07651_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07651\07651_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07651\07651_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07651\07651_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07651\07651_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 07651\Certification Statement_07651.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 07651\Supporting Documents\07651_APC 2009 Form 1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 07651\Supporting Documents\07651_Barry Section 2_3 Copy 5 C2-31 SCR.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 07651\Supporting Documents\07651_Barry Water Balance - WB1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### x 07651\Supporting Documents\07651_CBI_Cost Summary- Barry 3-5 Ash Transport

System_CBI.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.