alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Michael DAGNAN, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-10335 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed January 24, 2018

*310Nicole Dana, James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Jerry Van Beard, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charles M, Bleil, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before STEWART, Chief-Judge, and ELROD and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges,

PER CURIAM: *

Michael Dagnan appeals the 24-month sentence he received after he pleaded guilty to theft of government property. The presentence report indicated that after Dagnan fraudulently purchased postal stamps, he advertised them at a discounted rate on the internet. He challenges the district court’s application of U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1(b)(2)(A)(ii) to enhance his sentence based upon its determination that he used mass marketing to commit the offense.

The Government argues that any error the district court might have made in applying § 2B1.1(b)(2)(A)(ii) was harmless. We agree that if there was error, it was harmless. The district court had both proposed guidelines ranges before it. Even if the district court does not consider the alternative range asserted by the appellant to be the correct range, we will consider an error in the guidelines calculation to be harmless “if the proponent of the sentence ‘convincingly demonstrates both (1) that the district court would have imposed the same sentence had it not made the error, and (2) that it would have done so for the same reasons it gave at the prior sentencing.’” *United States v. Richardson,*676 F.3d 491, 511 (5th Cir. 2012) (quoting *United States v. Ibarra-Luna,*628 F.3d 712, 714 (5th Cir. 2010)).

Here, when overruling Dagnan’s objection to the enhancement, the district court stated that, “[r]egardless, even if I had granted it, the sentence is going to be the same, what I think is an appropriate sentence, and it happened to be a guideline sentence.” Considering this statement, the district court clearly would have imposed the 24-month term of imprisonment regardless of the applicable guidelines range. Accordingly, any error the district court might have made in applying the two-level enhancement under § 2B 1.1(b)(2) (A) (ii), with the concomitant two-level increase to offense level 16, was harmless. *See Richardson,*676 F.3d at 511-12; *see also United States v. Gutierrez-Mendez,*752 F.3d 418, 430 (5th Cir. 2014).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
# FILED October 31, 19 97 Cecil Crowso n, Jr. Ap pellate Co urt C lerk IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESS EE

EAST ERN S ECTI ON

WILLIAM L. COOK, ) C/A NO. 03A01-9706-CV-00212 ) Plaintiff-A ppella nt, ) S ULLI VAN LAW ) v. ) ) BROO KSIDE USED A UTO PA RTS, ) IN C., ) ) Defendant-Appel lee. )

O R D E R

Thi s c au se was re gul arly he ar d a nd c ons id er ed by t he co urt. IT IS NOW OR DE RE D th at the jud gm ent o f the Tria l Co urt is vac ated , and the c aus e rem and ed. The costs o f app eal are adjud ged to defen dant, fo r wh ich ex ecutio n m ay issu e if
necessary.

PER CU RIU M
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made to thatcertain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2014, by andamong DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, TORCHLIGHT LOAN SERVICES,LLC, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee,and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator,Paying Agent and Custodian, and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC as OperatingAdvisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, COMM2014-CCRE20 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

  

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
No. 83663 

# FILE NOV 1 7 2021 ELIZAB A. BROWN C t OF UPREME COURT MICHAEL LUIS COTA, Petitioner, vs. THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF DOUGLAS, Res • ondent. a ORDER DENYING PETITION DEPUTY CLERK
This is an original writ petition seeking to compel the district court to take action on several documents filed in the district court.

The decision to entertain a petition for extraordinary writ relief lies within the discretion of this court. Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991) (recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition). A writ of mandamus is available only to compel the performance of a legally required act or to cure an arbitrary and capricious exercise of discretion. Round Hill Gen. Improvement Dist. v. Newman, 97 Nev. 601, 603-04, 637 P.2d 534, 536 (1981). It is petitioner's burden to demonstrate that extraordinary relief is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with a copy of the documents he alleges to have filed with the district court, namely a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, petition for genetic marker analysis, "motion to order counsel to produce all case records", or proof of service of the postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus, on the SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA i01 1947A 454b.

,9



### attorney general or district attorney, precluding writ relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

, C.J.

Hardesty 

## 412.6.51V= ,let4C4-0 Parraguirre Stiglich

cc: Michael Luis Cota Attorney General/Carson City Douglas County District AttorneyfMinden Douglas County Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 101 1947A c4Egfp
|WELLS FARGO(logo) | Commercial
Mortgage ServicingD1050-084, 8th Floor401 South Tryon St.Charlotte,
NC 282021-800-326-1334
|----------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby made to that
certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2014, by and among GS MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORPORATION II, as Depositor,
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as General Special Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT
LLC, as Cypresswood Court Shopping Center Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Operating Advisor, U.S. BANK NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator and U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-GC26 (the “Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined
shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant to Section 10.07 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage
Services do hereby certify that:



|1. |  | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December
31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under
my supervision, and
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. |  | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.                                                       



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of
the 28th day of February 2017.



|/s/ Daniel Bober         | 
|------------------------ | 
|Daniel Bober             | 
|Executive Vice President | 
|Wells Fargo Bank         | 



|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Together we’ll go far
|---------------------- | ---------------------
(logo) Rialto CAPITAL

 

 

**2016 Annual Statement ofServicer Compliance (Item 1123)**

 

 

Pooling and Servicing Agreement(the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of November 1,2014 by and among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, RialtoCapital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation as Certificate Administrator, Wilmington Trust, NationalAssociation as Trustee and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC as Senior Trust Advisorrelating to the JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2014-C25, CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-C25 **(JPMBB 2014-C25)**

 

 

The undersigned, a dulyauthorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the“Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1. All servicing activitiesand performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2. A review of the servicingactivities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1,2016 to December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordancewith the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under mysupervision.

 

3. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligationsunder the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all materialrespects for the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfillany such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature andstatus thereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

  

Certified by: /s/ Adam Singer

Adam Singer, Managing Director

Date: March1, 2017
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         657,869
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              101,078,637
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             202,467,539
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        61,578
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               202,467,539
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,221,533
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,530,555
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               324,819
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,616,724
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,315,143
<INCOME-TAX>                                   960,784
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,354,359
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,354,359
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
        

</TABLE>
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 4, 2012

y0328 

# Order

April 4, 2012

144093

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144093 COA: 295169 Kent CC: 09-001077-FC LUIS ALBERTO GUTIERREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 2, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                       Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
                       the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

        DATE OF REPORT (DATE OF EARLIEST EVENT REPORTED): AUGUST 7, 2002

                                   DYNEGY INC.
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

       Illinois                        1-15659                   74-2928353
(State or other jurisdiction   (Commission File Number)        (IRS Employer
    of incorporation)                                       Identification No.)

                           1000 Louisiana, Suite 5800
                              Houston, Texas 77002
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

       Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (713) 507-6400

                                 Not Applicable
          (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

<PAGE>


ITEM 5. OTHER EVENTS.

     On August 7, 2002, Dynegy Inc. ("Dynegy") issued a press release announcing
that Robert C. Oelkers had been elected to Dynegy's Board of Directors and Audit
and Compliance Committee, effective as of August 6, 2002. Mr. Oelkers, a former
Texaco Inc. executive, replaced Patricia M. Eckert, who resigned from Dynegy's
Board of Directors effective as of August 1, 2002. A copy of Dynegy's August 7,
2002 press release is attached hereto as exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein
by this reference.

     In addition, in further support of Dynegy's previously announced $2 billion
capital plan, Dynegy's Board of Directors has elected not to pay a dividend on
Dynegy's Class A or Class B common stock for the third quarter 2002. Payments of
dividends for subsequent periods will be in the discretion of the Board of
Directors, but Dynegy does not foresee reinstating the dividend in the near
term.

ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS

a) Financial Statements of Business Acquired - Not Applicable.

b) Pro Forma Financial Information - Not Applicable.

c) Exhibits:

      99.1     Press Release of Dynegy Inc. dated August 7, 2002.



<PAGE>


                                    SIGNATURE

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                         DYNEGY INC.

                                  BY:  /s/ Keith R. Fullenweider
                                      -----------------------------------
                                      Keith R. Fullenweider
                                      Senior Vice President, Deputy General
                                      Counsel and Secretary

Dated:  August 9, 2002
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Shao Jian Wang, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PacificNet Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant `s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant`s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: May 22, 2006                               /s/ SHAO JIAN WANG
                                                 ------------------
                                                 Shao Jian Wang
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 (Principal Accounting Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 53 (Friday, March 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 15366]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05723]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-914]


Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube From the People's Republic 
of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 
2019-2020; Correction

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On March 11, 2022, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) 
published a notice in the Federal Register, in which it issued the 
final results of the 2019-2020 antidumping duty administrative review 
of light-walled rectangular pipe and tube from the People's Republic of 
China (China). The notice inadvertently contained an incorrect rate for 
the China-wide entity.

DATES: Applicable March 18, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Hanna, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0835.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In the Federal Register of March 11, 2022, in FR Doc. 2022-05210, 
page 13969 in the third column, Commerce included an incorrect China-
wide rate of 264.64 percent. The correct China-wide rate is 255.07 
percent.

Background

    On March 11, 2022, Commerce inadvertently published an incorrect 
rate in the final results of the 2019-2020 antidumping duty 
administrative review of light-walled rectangular pipe and tube from 
China.\1\ In the final results, Commerce incorrectly listed the China-
wide rate as 264.64 percent, while the correct China-wide rate is 
255.07 percent. This notice serves as a notification of, and correction 
to, this inadvertent error. With the issuance of this notice of 
correction, we confirm that the China-wide rate is 255.07.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from the People's 
Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; 2019-2020, 87 FR 13968 (March 11, 2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.

    Dated: March 14, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2022-05723 Filed 3-17-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P