alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 24 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 24

  Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp should be 
    issued in recognition of the services rendered by this Nation's 
                        volunteer firefighters.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 1997

  Mr. Forbes submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp should be 
    issued in recognition of the services rendered by this Nation's 
                        volunteer firefighters.

Whereas volunteer firefighters, a brotherhood of patriotic Americans dedicated 
        to saving our communities from the ravages of fire, place the public 
        health and welfare, and the security of our homes, schools, and places 
        of worship ahead of their own personal safety;
Whereas 1998 marks the 350th anniversary of the first volunteer fire department 
        in the United States;
Whereas there are over 800,000 volunteer firefighters serving in the United 
        States;
Whereas 87 percent of our Nation's fire service is conducted by volunteers;
Whereas there are over 24,000 fire departments in the United States that are 
        staffed in whole or in part by volunteers; and
Whereas these professionally trained men and women have dedicated thousands of 
        hours of their personal time to advanced training toward the end of 
        safeguarding the lives and property of others: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that the Citizens' Stamp Advisory 
Committee of the United States Postal Service should recommend to the 
Postmaster General that a postage stamp be issued to commemorate the 
350th anniversary of the Volunteer Fire Service.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           500,084
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       2,347
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 604,453
<CASH>                                           7,155
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           2,422,150
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         117,675
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,324,448
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              2,735,495
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  97,601
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           41,981
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,500
<OTHER-SE>                                     257,932
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,324,448
<PREMIUMS>                                      74,673
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              9,104
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (4,689)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   1,665
<BENEFITS>                                      70,111
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      2,997
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             6,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,345
<INCOME-TAX>                                       492
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                853
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        (234)
<NET-INCOME>                                       619
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    12.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    12.38
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Onyx Acceptance Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John
W. Hall, President, CEO and Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ JOHN W. HALL  
 This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
and not for any other purpose. 1




---



##### 



EXHIBIT 32 Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Onyx Acceptance Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Don P.
Duffy, EVP, CFO and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ DON P. DUFFY  
 This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
and not for any other purpose. 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Markus Vic WARREN, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-10259 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 20, 2017

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Markus Vic Warren, Pro Se

Before JONES, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Markus Vic Warren has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Warren has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
No. 11-683.

#### Almerfedi *v.*Obama, President of the United States, et al.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 11.1
                      INTELLIQUEST INFORMATION GROUP, INC.
             STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              For the Nine Months
                                                                     Ended
                                                               September 30, 1996
                                                              -------------------
<S>                                                                   <C>
Net income available to common stockholders. . . . . . . . .         $1,441
                                                                     ------
Weighted average shares outstanding:
  Common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          6,888
  Common stock issued upon exercise of options 
    and warrants (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .            187
                                                                     ------

Weighted average common shares and equivalents . . . . . . .          7,075

Net income per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         $  .20
                                                                     ------
</TABLE>

----------------------
(1) This exhibit should be read in conjunction with Note 3 of Notes to
    Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

(2) Stock options granted and warrants exercised, using the treasury stock
    method, have been included in the calculation of the common stock
    equivalent shares.




















                                      15
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                                          6,468
<SECURITIES>                                   10,236
<RECEIVABLES>                                  11,993
<ALLOWANCES>                                      311
<INVENTORY>                                        56
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               29,510
<PP&E>                                         14,043
<DEPRECIATION>                                  9,401
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 41,111
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          26,639
<BONDS>                                             0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          105
<OTHER-SE>                                      5,409
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   41,111
<SALES>                                        12,758
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               12,758
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  11,929
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 54
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,038
<INCOME-TAX>                                      236
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               802
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      802
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.08
        

</TABLE>
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 201 3

- NM

- 220

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
(logo) Rialto

     CAPITAL

 

 

 

2014 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)

 

 

                Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of November 1, 2014 by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC as Trust Advisor, and Wilmington Trust, National Association as Trustee relating to the WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2014-C24, Commercial Mortgage Pass-through Certificates, Series 2014-C24 **(WFRBS 2014-C24)**

 

                

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.        All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2.        A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of November 18, 2014 to December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3.        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

 

 

Certified by: /s/ Adam Singer                                                                  Date: March 5, 2015

           Adam Singer, Managing Director
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 16, 2009

d0909 

# Order

September 16, 2009

138562 & (64)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138562 COA: 281666 Wayne CC: 07-007697-01 DIONTE MARQUIS NEAL, Defendant-Appellant.

_____________ _______________ ___________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 24, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to
remand is DENIED.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

Thecertification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and ExchangeCommission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63of Title 18 of the United States Code.

May11, 2007

BruceN. Warner, the Chief Financial Officer of Northern California Bancorp, Inc.certifies:

a.               thatthis periodic report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

b.              thatinformation contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of NorthernCalifornia Bancorp, Inc.
|   | /s/ Bruce N. Warner          |   |
|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|   | Bruce N. Warner              |
|   | Chief Financial Officer and  |
|   | Principal Accounting Officer |

 

1

----
No. 11-1295.

No. 11-1308.

No. 11-10192.

No. 11-10205.

No. 11-10235.

#### Tatar *v.*United States; Duka *v.*United States; Duka *v.*United States; Duka *v.*United States; and Shnewer *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 671 F. 3d 329.
418 P.2d 618

#### Leonard L. CATCHPOLE, Thelma Catchpole, his wife et al., Appellants, v. Edward T. NARRAMORE and Mary N. Narramore, his wife, Appellees.

1 CA-CIV 201.

Court of Appeals of Arizona. Division 1.

Oct. 17, 1966.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 17, 1966.

Review Granted Jan. 4, 1967.

E. Gene Wade, Mesa, for appellants.

*189William Burke, Phoenix, Brown, Vlassis & Bain, by C. Randall Bain, Phoenix, for appellees.

STEVENS, Chief Judge.

This cause was decided in the Superior Court on the motion for summary judgment filed by the plaintiffs who are the appellees herein. Both sides agree that - there is no dispute as to the facts.

The Narramores sued the Catchpoles, the Whalens and the Beaches. Only the Catch-poles were served and only they appeared in the Superior Court. - Certain real property in California was subject to three deeds of trust. The first deed of trust was in favor of the Holmbergs. The purchase money note which is the subject of this matter now under consideration was secured by the second deed of trust. In relation to this instrument the Beaches were the sellers of the property and the payees of the note. The Catchpoles and the Whalens were the buyers of the property under a deed of trust as well as being the makers of the note.. The Narramores acquired the note from the Beaches. There was a third deed of trust in favor of the Narramores. The property was severely damaged and a substantial percentage of its value was destroyed. There was a non-judicial sale of the property under the first deed of trust.

The legal issue presented by the motion for summary judgment was whether the California Statutes were procedural or substantive in relation to their effect upon litigation in Arizona. On 27 April 1966, after the appeal was perfected, the Arizona Supreme Court decided the case of Martin v. Midgett, 100 Ariz. 284, 413 P.2d 754 (1966). Martin held that they were procedural. In our opinion, the rules set forth in Martin require the affirmance of the judgment.

The judgment is affirmed.

CAMERON and DONOFRIO, JJ., concur.
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 15 July 2004

in Case C-424/02: Commission of the European Communities v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 75/439/EEC - Disposal of waste oils - Priority to be given to the processing of waste oils by regeneration)

(2004/C 228/15)

Language of the case: English

In Case C-424/02: Commission of the European Communities (Agents: X. Lewis and M. Konstantinidis) v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Agent: M. Bethell, assisted by M. Demetriou) — application for a declaration that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations or administrative provisions necessary to comply with Article 3(1) of Council Directive 75/439/EEC of 16 June 1975 on the disposal of waste oils (OJ 1975 L 194, p. 23), as amended by Directive 87/101/EEC of 22 December 1986 (OJ 1987 L 42, p. 43), requiring Member States to take the measures necessary to give priority to the processing of waste oils by regeneration or, in any event, by failing to notify such provisions to the Commission, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive — the Court (First Chamber), composed of: P. Jann (President of the Chamber), A. Rosas, S. von Bahr, R. Silva de Lapuerta (Rapporteur) and K. Lenaerts, Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; L. Hewlett, Registrar, gave a judgment on 15 July 2004, in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 19 of 25.1.2003.

----
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 16

- 00393

- CR

MARCUS ESEDE ALI

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 of Travis County , Texas Trial Cause No. C

- 1

- CR

- 15

- 218479

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. June 28, 2018
# Official Journal L 6/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 6 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 648 January 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 6

English edition

Legislation

Volume 648 January 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/15 of 7 January 2021 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU concerning animal health control measures relating to African swine fever in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2021) 112)

   (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/15 of 7 January 2021 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU concerning animal health control measures relating to African swine fever in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2021) 112)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2021) 112)

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 35.5  LOGO Annual Statement as to Compliance For the Period of January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 WFRBS 2014-C22 In accordance with Item 1123 of Regulation AB andwith the requirements detailed in §11.12 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the
Agreement) for the above-mentioned CMBS pool, CWCapital Asset Management LLC (CWCAM), in its capacity as Special Servicer, is providing this Officers Certificate with respect to the following:  (A)
a review of CWCAMs activities during the preceding calendar year or portion thereof (the
Reporting Period) and of CWCAMs performance under the Agreement has been made under such officers supervision; and  (B)
to the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, CWCAM has fulfilled all its obligations
under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact us. Sincerely, CWCapital Asset Management LLC /s/ James P. Shevlin James P. Shevlin President/Chief Operating Officer   7501 Wisconsin Avenue |
Suite 500 West | Bethesda, MD | 20814