alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 68 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 68

                Relating to impact on local governments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 20 (legislative day, January 10), 1995

 Mr. Pressler (for Mr. Bradley) (for himself, Mr. Chafee, Mr. Dorgan, 
   Mr. Simpson, Mr. Robb, Mr. Dole, Mr. Nickles, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. 
  Kempthorne, and Mr. Wellstone) submitted the following resolution; 
                   which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
                Relating to impact on local governments.

Whereas the Congress should be concerned about shifting costs from Federal to 
        State and local authorities and should be equally concerned about the 
        growing tendency of States to shift costs to local governments;
Whereas the cost shifting from States to local governments has, in many 
        instances, forced local governments to raise property taxes or curtail 
        sometimes essential services; and
Whereas the increases in local property taxes and cuts in essential services 
        threaten the ability of many citizens to attain and maintain the 
        American dream of owning a home in a safe, secure community: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that--
            (1) The Federal Government should not shift certain costs 
        to the State, and States should end the practice of shifting 
        costs to local governments, which forces many local governments 
        to increase property taxes;
            (2) States should end the imposition, in the absence of 
        full consideration by their legislatures, of State issued 
        mandates on local governments without adequate State funding, 
        in a manner that may displace other essential government 
        priorities; and
            (3) one primary objective of this Act and other efforts to 
        change the relationship among Federal, State, and local 
        governments should be to reduce taxes and spending at all 
        levels and to end the practice of shifting costs from one level 
        of government to another with little or no benefit to 
        taxpayers.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AUDREY L. KIMNER, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

CAPITAL TITLE OF TEXAS, LLC; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 20-15861 

D.C. No. 5:19-cv-07576-EJD 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Edward J. Davila, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2021**

Before: GRABER, R. NELSON, and HUNSAKER, Circuit Judges.

Audrey L. Kimner appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing 

her action alleging federal and state law claims arising from Texas state court cases 

in which Kimner claimed fraud in the sale of her condominium. We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under the 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 18 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-15861 

Rooker-Feldman doctrine, Noel v. Hall, 341 F.3d 1148, 1154 (9th Cir. 2003), and 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir. 

2012). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Kimner’s claims against all defendants 

(except Margaret A. Poissant) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under the 

Rooker-Feldman doctrine because her claims are a “de facto appeal” of the Texas

state court decisions. Noel, 341 F.3d at 1163-65.

The district court properly dismissed nonresident defendant Poissant because 

Kimner failed to allege facts sufficient to establish that the district court had 

personal jurisdiction over her. See Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co., 374 

F.3d 797, 801-02 (9th Cir. 2004) (discussing requirements for general and specific 

personal jurisdiction). 

We reject as unpersuasive Kinmer’s contentions that Magistrate Judge 

Cousins was biased or conspired against her.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued 

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009). 

AFFIRMED.
EX-35 (a)
(logo) imb
IndymacBank


REG AB 1123 Statement of Compliance


I am an authorized officer for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B, the servicer for the
transactions listed on the attached schedule and I certify:

a) A review of IndyMac Bank's activities during the reporting period and of its
performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my
supervision.

b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, except as set forth below
IndyMac Bank has fulfilled all of its obligations under the agreement in all
material respects throughout the reporting period.

c) None


By: /s/ Robert M. Abramian
Robert M. Abramian
First Vice President
Home Loan Servicing
Investor Reporting
Indymac Bank


By: /s/ Bart Vincent
Bart Vincent
First Vice President
HLS-Finance
Financial
Indymac Bank


Prepared for: Wells Fargo Bank

Date: February 28, 2007

Ref: EXHIBIT A


www.indymacbank.com

7700 W. Parmer Lane, Bldg D, Austin, TX 78729
Tel: 512.250.2700


(page)


EXHIBIT A

849 GSR 2006-1F 1/30/06
902 BSALTA 2006-1 1/30/06
840 DBALT 2006-AR1 1/31/06
918 BAYVIEW 2006-A 02/08/06
213 GSR 2006-2F
214 GSR 2006-3F 03-30-06
159 GSR 2006-0A1 8/24/06
229 MASTR 2006-1 03-29-06
223 DBALT 2006-AF1 03-31-06
231 HARBORVIEW 2006-2
233 LUMINENT 2006-3 (4-28-06)
287 LUMINENT 2006-5 (6-29-06)
454 LUMINENT CONDUIT 12MAT WLS 11/27/06
5001 LUMINENT 12MAT CONDUIT WLS 12/27/06
235 BAFC 2006-D 04/28/06
219 GSR 2006-5F 5/26/06
809 GSR 2006-6F (GS) 6/30/06
808 HARBORVIEW 2006-6 6/30/06
807 DBALTA 2006-AR 2 6/30/06
921 BSALTA 2006-4 6/30/06
285 MALT 2006-3 (6-30-06)
141 BSALTA 2006-5 7/28/06
278 GSAMP 2006-S4 (6-9-06)
199 HARBORVIEW 2006-8 (GW) 8/30/06
430 LUMINENT 2006-6 092806
432 MLMI 2006-F1 (ML) 09/29/06
379 CSMC 2006-8 09/29/06
378 BAFC 2006-H 9/29/06
178 MARM 2006-0A2 11/15/06
296 GSAA 2006-17 10/30/06
297 DBALT 2006-AR5 10/30/06
442 CSMC 2006-9 10/30/2006
440 ITF CSAB 2006-3 10/31/2006
456 JPALT 2006-S4 11/29/06
457 BCAP 2006-AA2 11/30/2006
458 ACE 2006-SD3 11/30/06
4101 DBALT 2006-AR6 12/15/06
4102 HARBORVIEW 2006-14 12/22/06
4103 MSM 2006-17XS 12/28/06
4104 GSR 2006-10F 12/29/06
4110 LUMINENT 2006-7 12/14/2006
4105 JPMMT 2006-S4 12/21/06
4106 GSAA 2006-20 12/29/06
4111 BSALTA 2006-8 12/28/06
PAD District / Refinery Location Total Atmospheric Distillation Capacity (bbl/cd) Crude Oil Total Downstream Charge Capacity (bbl/sd) Date Operable Date of Last Operation Date Shutdown 

## Table 13. Shutdown and Reactivated Refineries During 2007

a b REACTIVATED PAD District II 12,000 

### Ventura Refining & Transmission LLC Thomas, OK 12,000 05/07 OTHERc PAD District III 0 0 

### Equistar Chemicals LP Channelview, TX 0 0 02/57 SHUTDOWN PAD District III 16,700 15,400 

### Gulf Atlantic Operations LLC Mobile, AL 16,700 15,400 03/78 03/06 09/07 Total U.S. Shutdowns 16,700 15,400 a b

### bbl/cd=Barrels per calendar day. bbl/sd=Barrels per stream day. c

### Equistar Chemicals LP is a wholly owned subsidiary of Access Industries (formerly Lyondell Chemical Company). The Channelview, TX plant does not have any atmospheric crude oil distillation capacity or downstream charge capacity but is included in the total refinery counts on Table 1. The production capacity of the alkylation plant is included on Tables 2, 4, and 7. Sources: Energy Information Administration (EIA) Form EIA-810, "Monthly Refinery Report" and Form EIA-820, "Annual Refinery Report."

Energy Information Administration, Refinery Capacity 2008 

### 50
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Powerhouse Technologies Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Gregory A. Duffell, Secretary, Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.



/s/ Gregory A. Duffell
--------------------------------------------
Gregory A. Duffell
Secretary, Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Date: March 12, 2004
No. 12M28.

#### C. F. *v.*West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources et al.

Motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari with supplemental appendix under seal granted.
# Official Journal L 270/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 270 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5711 September 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 270

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5711 September 2014

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 957/2014 of 10 September 2014 amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council and the Annex to Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012 as regards the removal of montan acid esters (E 912) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 958/2014 of 10 September 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 4 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2014/657/EU |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision of 10 September 2014 accepting a proposal by a group of exporting producers together with the China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products for clarifications concerning the implementation of the undertaking referred to in Implementing Decision 2013/707/EU | 6 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 957/2014 of 10 September 2014 amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council and the Annex to Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012 as regards the removal of montan acid esters (E 912) (
  1
  )

1

1

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 958/2014 of 10 September 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

4

DECISIONS

2014/657/EU

*

Commission Implementing Decision of 10 September 2014 accepting a proposal by a group of exporting producers together with the China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products for clarifications concerning the implementation of the undertaking referred to in Implementing Decision 2013/707/EU

6

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TALK VISUAL
CORPORATION'S  BALANCE  SHEET  AS OF  MARCH  31,  2000  AND  THE  STATEMENTS  OF
OPERATIONS,  STOCKHOLDERS'  EQUITY AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE PERIOD THEN ENDED, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             1048981
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       110662
<ALLOWANCES>                                          3017
<INVENTORY>                                          60752
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   1604132
<PP&E>                                            11964560
<DEPRECIATION>                                      393225
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    14365887
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              1449784
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                            791
<COMMON>                                             40707
<OTHER-SE>                                         7959784
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      14365887
<SALES>                                              22416
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    341531
<CGS>                                               181484
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    882257
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  180304
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (780167)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (780167)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     122347
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (780167)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.02)



</TABLE>
#### Gordon DYE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, a foreign limited partnership; Recontrust Company, NA, a federal bank, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 12-35406

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted January 16, 2018 *

Filed January 22, 2018

Gordon Dye, Pro Se

Peter D. Hawkes, Attorney, Pilar Cort-wright French, Esquire, Attorney, Lane Powell PC, Portland, OR, Steven Andrew Ellis, Goodwin Procter LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees

*303Before: REINHARDT, TROTT, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Gordon Dye appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his diversity action arising out of foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), *Thompson v. Paul,*547 F.3d 1066, 1058-59 (9th Cir. 2008), and we vacate and remand.

The district court dismissed Dye’s action with prejudice after finding, among other things, that Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”) was a valid beneficiary of Dye’s deed of trust under Oregon law. However, after the district court entered judgment, the Oregon Supreme Court decided, in reviewing a deed of trust similar to Dye’s, that MERS cannot be a “beneficiary” of a deed of trust under the Oregon Trust Deed Act, nor is MERS eligible to serve as the beneficiary simply by being designated as such in the deed of trust. *See Brandrup v. ReconTrust Co., N.A.,*353 Or. 668, 303 P.3d 301, 304, 309-12 (2013) (en banc). Because the district court did not have the benefit of *Brandrwp*when it entered its order of dismissal, we vacate and remand for further proceedings in light of *Brandrwp.*

We reject as without merit appellees’ contention that Dye has “judicially admitted” facts defeating his own claims. *See Marder v. Lopez,*450 F.3d 445, 448 (9th Cir. 2006) (setting forth circumstances in which a court may consider, on a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, evidence outside the contents of the complaint).

The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.

VACATED and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 104 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 104

  Referring S. 676 entitled ``A bill for the relief of D.W. Jacobson, 
 Ronald Karkala, and Paul Bjorgen of Grand Rapids, Minnesota, and for 
   other purposes'' to the chief judge of the United States Court of 
                  Federal Claims for a report on bill.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 5, 1995

Mr. Grams submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Referring S. 676 entitled ``A bill for the relief of D.W. Jacobson, 
 Ronald Karkala, and Paul Bjorgen of Grand Rapids, Minnesota, and for 
   other purposes'' to the chief judge of the United States Court of 
                  Federal Claims for a report on bill.

    Resolved, That the bill S. 676 entitled ``A bill for the relief of 
D.W. Jacobson, Ronald Karkala, and Paul Bjorgen of Grand Rapids, 
Minnesota, and for other purposes'' is referred, with all accompanying 
papers, to the chief judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims 
for a report in accordance with sections 1492 and 2509 of title 28, 
United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 10.3




FIRST AMENDMENT TO LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT




Agreement dated July 23, 2010 between Sterling National Bank, a national banking association having an address at 500 Seventh Avenue, New York, New York 10018 (“Secured Party”) and Coffee Holding Co., Inc. a Nevada corporation and Organic Products Trading Company LLC, a Delaware limited liability company with its principal and executive offices located at 3475 Victor), Boulevard, Staten Island, New York 10314 (“Debtor”).





RECITALS




1.           Debtor and Secured Party have entered into a Loan and Security Agreement February 17, 2009 (the “Security Agreement”), as modified by that certain Loan Modification Agreement dated July 22, 2010 (the “Loan Modification Amendment,” and together with the Loan and Security Agreement, the “Security Documents”). All capitalized terms used in this Amendment and not defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Loan and Security Agreement.




2.           Pursuant to the Security Documents, Debtor has obtained loans and advances from Secured Party from time to time.




3.           Debtor desires to continue to obtain such loans from Secured Party and Secured Party is willing to continue to make such loans.




NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and undertakings hereinafter set forth, it is hereby agreed, by and between parties hereto, as follows:




AGREEMENT




1.           Paragraph 6.4.5, is hereby amended to state that Debtor, Coffee Holding Co., Inc., shall be permitted to declare and pay a quarterly dividend of not more than 3 cents per share per quarter.




2.           Except as set forth herein, all terms and provisions of the Security Documents shall remain unchanged.




COFFEE HOLDING CO., INC.By:
/s/ Andrew GordonAndrew GordonPresident







ORGANIC PRODUCTS TRADINGCOMPANY LLCBy:
/s/ Andrew GordonAndrew GordonManager
  1





ACCEPTED on July 23, 2010




STERLING NATIONAL BANKBy:
/s/ Murray R. MarkowitzMurray R. MarkowitzFirst Vice President
H. Con. Res. 224 Agreed to October 21, 1998

One Hundred Fifth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-eight

Concurrent Resolution

Whereas many children in the United States have been abducted

by family members who are foreign nationals and living in foreign

countries;

Whereas children who have been abducted by an estranged father

are very rarely returned, through legal remedies, from countries

that only recognize the custody rights of the father;

Whereas there are at least 140 cases that need to be resolved

in which children have been abducted by family members and

taken to foreign countries;

Whereas, although the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, done at the Hague on October 25,

1980, has made progress in aiding the return of abducted children,

the Convention does not address the criminal aspects of child

abduction, and there is a need to reach agreements regarding

child abduction with countries that are not parties to the Convention; and

Whereas decisions on awarding custody of children should be made

in the children’s best interest, and persons who violate laws

of the United States by abducting their children should not be

rewarded by being granted custody of those children: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That the Congress urges international cooperation in working

to resolve those cases in which children in the United States are

abducted by family members who are foreign nationals and taken
H. Con. Res. 224—2

to foreign countries, and in seeing that justice is served by holding

accountable the abductors for violations of criminal law.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.