Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 15609 

(3) Totaling the results in section 

11(b)(2); 

(4) Multiplying the total production to 

be counted (see section 11(c)) by type, 

if applicable, by the respective price 

election; 

(5) Totaling the results in section 

11(b)(4); 

(6) Subtracting the results in section 

11(b)(5) from the results in section 

11(b)(3); and 

(7) Multiplying the result in section 

11(b)(6) by your share. 

For example: 

You have a 100 percent share in 50 

acres of early variety A in the unit, with 

a guarantee of 140 bushels per acre and 

a price election of $16.00 per bushel. 

You are only able to harvest 6,000 

bushels due to an insured cause of loss. 

Your indemnity would be calculated as 

follows: 

(1) 50 acres × 140 bushels = 7,000 

bushel guarantee; 

(2) 7,000 bushels × $16.00 price 

election = $112,000.00 value of 

guarantee; 

(4) 6,000 bushels × $16.00 price 

election = $96,000.00 value of 

production to count; 

(6) $112,000.00 ¥ $96,000.00 = 

$16,000 loss; and 

(7) $16,000 × 100 percent = $16,000 

indemnity. 

(c) The total production to count from 

all insurable acreage on the unit will 

include: 

(1) All appraised production as 

follows: 

(i) Not less than the production 

guarantee for acreage: 

(A) That is abandoned; 

(B) That is sold by direct marketing if 

you fail to meet the requirements 

contained in section 10 of these Crop 

Provisions; 

(C) That is damaged solely by 

uninsured causes; or 

(D) For which you fail to provide 

production records that are acceptable 

to us; 

(ii) Production lost due to uninsured 

causes; 

(iii) Unharvested production; 

(iv) Potential production on insured 

acreage that you intend to abandon or 

no longer care for, if you and we agree 

on the appraised amount of production. 

Upon such agreement, the insurance 

period for that acreage will end. If you 

do not agree with our appraisal, we may 

defer the claim only if you agree to 

continue to care for the crop. We will 

then make another appraisal when you 

notify us of further damage or that 

harvest is general in the area unless you 

harvested the crop, in which case we 

will use the harvested production. If 

you do not continue to adequately care 

for the crop, our appraisal made prior to 

deferring the claim will be used to 

determine the production to count; and 

(2) All harvested production from the 

insurable acreage. 

12. Late and Prevented Planting. 

The late and prevented planting 

provisions of the Basic Provisions are 

not applicable. 

Signed in Washington, DC, on March 24, 

2010. 

William J. Murphy, 

Manager, Federal Crop Insurance 

Corporation. 

[FR Doc. 2010–6975 Filed 3–29–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–08–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 61 

[Docket No. FAA–2007–29015; Amdt. No. 

61–125A] 

RIN 2120–AJ10 

Certification of Aircraft and Airmen for 

the Operation of Light-Sport Aircraft; 

Modifications to Rules for Sport Pilots 

and Flight Instructors With a Sport 

Pilot Rating; Correction 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule; correction. 

SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting a final 

rule published on February 1, 2010. In 

that rule, the FAA amended its 

regulations for sport pilots and flight 

instructors with a sport pilot rating to 

address airman certification and 

operational issues that have arisen since 

regulations for the certification of 

aircraft and airmen for the operation of 

light-sport aircraft were implemented in 

2004. This document corrects errors in 

the codified text of that document. 

DATES: The final rule and this correction 

will become effective April 2, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

technical questions concerning this rule, 

contact Larry L. Buchanan, Light-Sport 

Aviation Branch, AFS–610, Regulatory 

Support Division, Flight Standards 

Service, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 6500 South MacArthur 

Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169; 

telephone (405) 954–6400; Mailing 

address: Light-Sport Aviation Branch, 

AFS–610, P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma 

City, OK 73125. 

For legal questions concerning this 

rule, contact Paul G. Greer, Regulations 

Division, AGC–200, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence 

Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20591; 

telephone (202) 267–3073. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 1, 2010, the FAA 

published a final rule entitled, 

‘‘Certification of Aircraft and Airmen for 

the Operation of Light-Sport Aircraft; 

Modifications to Rules for Sport Pilots 

and Flight Instructors With a Sport Pilot 

Rating’’ (75 FR 5204). 

In that final rule, the FAA revised 

§ 61.327. Paragraph (a) introductory text 

of § 61.327 referenced endorsement 

requirements for a sport pilot operating 

‘‘a light-sport aircraft that has a VH less 

than or equal to 87 knots CAS.’’ 

Paragraph (b) introductory text of 

§ 61.327 referenced endorsement 

requirements for persons operating ‘‘a 

light-sport aircraft that has a VH greater 

than 87 knots CAS.’’ In the revision to 

§ 61.315(c)(14)(i) and (c)(14)(ii), 

however, references to those paragraphs 

of § 61.327 were incorrectly cited. 

Additionally, the FAA revised 

§ 61.327 to require a sport pilot who 

seeks to operate a light-sport aircraft 

that has a VH less than or equal to 87 

knots CAS to receive and log training in 

an aircraft that has a VH less than or 

equal to 87 knots CAS. In the preamble 

to the final rule, the FAA noted that it 

‘‘does not believe that receiving training 

in an airplane with a VH greater than 87 

knots CAS will adequately prepare a 

sport pilot to operate a low-speed, highdrag airplane with a VH less than or 

equal to 87 knots CAS without 

additional training.’’ The agency did not 

intend to require specific endorsements 

for other categories and classes of 

aircraft, such as powered parachutes 

and weight-shift-control aircraft that 

typically have a VH that does not exceed 

87 knots CAS. Accordingly the FAA is 

correcting § 61.327(a) and (c) to reflect 

the agency’s intent and is making 

conforming corrections in 

§§ 61.315(c)(14), 61.415(f), and 61.423 

(a)(2)(iii)(C). 

Sections 61.319 and 61.323 were 

revised to eliminate the requirement 

that persons exercising sport pilot 

privileges have an aircraft make-andmodel endorsement to operate an 

aircraft within a specific set of aircraft. 

The FAA therefore also should have 

included a conforming amendment to 

§ 61.317 Is my sport pilot certificate 

issued with aircraft category and class 

ratings? to remove reference to the 

words ‘‘make and model.’’ 

Lastly, §§ 61.315(c)(14)(ii) and 

61.327(c) contained provisions that 

permit a sport pilot to operate an aircraft 

with a VH less than or equal to 87 knots 

CAS if that person has logged flight time 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES

15610 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 

as pilot in command of an aircraft with 

a VH less than or equal to 87 knots CAS 

prior to March 3, 2010. The FAA is 

correcting this date to read ‘‘April 2, 

2010,’’ to correspond with the effective 

date of the final rule. 

Corrections 

In final rule FR Doc. 2010–2056, 

beginning on page 5204 in the Federal 

Register of February 1, 2010, make the 

following corrections: 

■ 1. On page 5222, in the first column, 

revise § 61.315(c)(14) to read as follows: 

§ 61.315 What are the privileges and limits 

of my sport pilot certificate? 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(14) If the aircraft: 

(i) Has a VH greater than 87 knots 

CAS, unless you have met the 

requirements of § 61.327(b). 

(ii) Has a VH less than or equal to 87 

knots CAS, unless you have met the 

requirements of § 61.327(a) or have 

logged flight time as pilot in command 

of an airplane with a VH less than or 

equal to 87 knots CAS before April 2, 

2010. 

* * * * * 

■ 2. On page 5222, in the first column, 

add amendment 15A to read as follows: 

§ 61.317 [Amended] 

■ 15A. Amend § 61.317 by removing the 

words ‘‘logbook endorsement for the 

category, class, and make and model of 

aircraft’’ from the last sentence and 

adding in their place the words ‘‘logbook 

endorsement for the category and class 

of aircraft’’. 

§ 61.327 [Corrected] 

■ 3. On page 5222, in the first column, 

amend § 61.327 by: 

■ a. Amending paragraph (a) 

introductory text by removing the words 

‘‘light-sport aircraft that has’’ and adding 

in their place the words ‘‘light-sport 

aircraft that is an airplane with’’. 

■ b. Amending paragraph (a)(1) by 

removing the word ‘‘aircraft’’ and adding 

in its place the word ‘‘airplane’’. 

■ c. Amending paragraph (a)(2) by 

removing the words ‘‘light-sport aircraft’’ 

and adding in their place the words 

‘‘light-sport aircraft that is an airplane’’. 

■ d. Amending paragraph (c) by 

removing the word ‘‘aircraft’’ and adding 

in its place the word ‘‘airplane’’ and by 

removing the date ‘‘March 3, 2010’’ and 

adding in its place the date ‘‘April 2, 

2010’’. 

§ 61.415 [Corrected] 

■ 4. On page 5222, in the second 

column, in § 61.415(f), remove the 

words ‘‘light-sport aircraft’’ and add in 

their place the words ‘‘light-sport 

aircraft that is an airplane’’. 

§ 61.423 [Corrected] 

■ 5. On page 5222, in the third column, 

in § 61.423(a)(2)(iii)(C), remove the 

words ‘‘light-sport aircraft’’ and add in 

their place the words ‘‘light-sport 

aircraft that is an airplane’’. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on March 25, 

2010. 

Pamela Hamilton-Powell, 

Director, Office of Rulemaking. 

[FR Doc. 2010–7039 Filed 3–29–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Food and Drug Administration 

21 CFR Part 558 

New Animal Drugs for Use in Animal 

Feeds 

CFR Correction 

In Title 21 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations, Parts 500 to 599, revised as 

of April 1, 2009, in § 558.55, on page 

408, at the end of the table to paragraph 

(d)(2), reinstate footnote 1 to read as 

follows: 

1Bacitracin zinc in § 510.600(c) of this 

chapter. 

[FR Doc. 2010–7095 Filed 3–29–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Internal Revenue Service 

26 CFR Part 1 

Consolidated Returns; Intercompany 

Obligations 

CFR Correction 

In Title 26 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 1 (§§ 1.1401 to 1.1550), 

revised as of April 1, 2009, on page 347, 

in §1.1502–13, move the first paragraph 

(g)(3)(i)(B)(1)(vi) into numerical order to 

follow (g)(3)(i)(B)(1)(v), remove the 

second paragraph (g)(3)(i)(B)(1)(vi), and 

reinstate paragraph (g)(3)(i)(B)(1)(iv) to 

read as follows: 

§ 1.1502–13 Intercompany transactions. 

* * * * * 

(g) * * * 

(3) * * * 

(i) * * * 

(B) * * * 

(1) * * * 

(iv) The transferee member has a 

nonmember shareholder; 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2010–7094 Filed 3–29–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Internal Revenue Service 

26 CFR Part 1 

Exclusions From Gross Income of 

Foreign Corporations 

CFR Correction 

In Title 26 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 1 (§§ 1.851 to 1.907), 

revised as of April 1, 2009, on page 444, 

in § 1.883–0, under the heading § 1.883– 

1, remove paragraphs (g)(3)(i), (g)(3)(ii), 

(h)(3)(i), (h)(3)(ii), and (h)(3)(iii). 

[FR Doc. 2010–7092 Filed 3–29–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Internal Revenue Service 

26 CFR Part 31 

Employment Taxes and Collection of 

Income Tax at Source 

CFR Correction 

In Title 26 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations, Parts 30 to 39, revised as of 

April 1, 2010, on page 262, in 

§ 31.3402(o)–3, replace the fifth 

sentence in paragraph (c) with three 

sentences to read as follows: 

§ 31.3402(o)–3 Extension of withholding to 

sick pay. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * If the payee is paid sick pay 

on a semimonthly basis, the specific 

whole dollar amount shall be at least 

$44 per semimonthly payment of sick 

pay. If the payee is paid sick pay on a 

monthly basis, the specific whole dollar 

amount shall be at least $88 per 

monthly payment of sick pay. If the 

payee is paid sick pay on a basis other 

than weekly, daily, biweekly, semimonthly, or monthly, the specific whole 

dollar amount shall be the equivalent of 

at least $4 per day, assuming a 5 day 

work week of 8 hours per day (40 hours 

total) in each 7 day calendar 

week. * * * 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2010–7093 Filed 3–29–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES