alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Hello Sona,

Yes, the values in the tables refer to the exposed surface area of the silage piles. The exposed surface area of TMR are shown 

below: 

For milk cows, dry cows, and large heifers – 0.658 m^2

For medium heifers – 0.282 m^2

For small heifers – 0.125 m^2

Each row represents a different type of pile, the first row is corn silage, the second row is alfalfa silage, and the third row is wheat 

silage. The alfalfa surface area is much lower because not all dairies use alfalfa and if they do its not on site for very long. Please 

let me know if you have any other questions. Thanks

Sheraz Gill

Supervising Air Quality Engineer

San Joaquin Valley APCD

Phone: (559) 230-5908

Fax: (559) 230-6061

sheraz.gill@valleyair.org

From: Chilingaryan.Sona@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Chilingaryan.Sona@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 10:16 AM 

To: Ramon Norman 

RE: clarifying passage re. silage surface area estimation in App. B of 2010 staff report for Rule 4570

Sheraz Gill 

to: 

Sona Chilingaryan, Ramon Norman 

11/23/2011 02:50 PM 

Cc: 

Nancy Levin 

Hide Details 

From: "Sheraz Gill" <Sheraz.Gill@valleyair.org>

To: Sona Chilingaryan/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, "Ramon Norman" <Ramon.Norman@valleyair.org>

Cc: Nancy Levin/R9/USEPA/US@EPA 

Follow Up: 

Normal Priority. 

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\nlevin\Local Settings\Temp\notesBAAA25\~web0975.htm 12/22/2011
Cc: Levin.Nancy@epamail.epa.gov; Sheraz Gill 

Subject: clarifying passage re. silage surface area estimation in App. B of 2010 staff report for Rule 4570 

 

Hi Ramon, 

I wanted to make sure we were understanding the following passage from pg. B-8 of the Rule 4570 staff report correctly: 

 

3) Silage Surface Area Estimation 

The emission factors for total mixed rations (TMR) and for silage are based on the total amount of surface area exposed. In 

meetings with dairy industry representatives, stakeholders provided an average exposed area for both TMR and silage piles at 

dairies of various sizes. The following surface area, in square meters (m2), will be used to calculate the emissions from TMR and 

silage on a per-dairy basis. 

The 225 m2 figure only refers to the exposed surface area of the silage pile and not the exposed surface area for TMR, correct? 

What surface area did the District assume was exposed for TMR? Also, what do each of the three different horizontal rows refer to? 

Why does the middle row indicate 24 m2 for a dairy with greater than 1000 milk cows, while the first and third rows indicate 225 

m2? 

 

Thanks very much, 

s. 

Sona Chilingaryan 

Agriculture Program 

U.S. EPA Region 9 

75 Hawthorne Street (Air-6) 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Phone: 415-972-3368 

Fax: 415-947-3579

Table 10 - Estimated Size of Pile (m2) Based on Size of Dairy 

Size of Dairy >1,000 Milk Cows 300 to 999 Milk Cows <300 Milk Cows 

Size of Pile (m2) 225 102 44.59 

Size of Pile (m2) 24 24 0 

Size of Pile (m2) 225 102 0 

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\nlevin\Local Settings\Temp\notesBAAA25\~web0975.htm 12/22/2011
#### Rafael Antonio RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 10-73234

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted November 15, 2017 *

Filed November 20, 2017

John D. Friedman, Attorney, Friedman & Ikon, Tarzana, CA, for Petitioner

OIL, Robert Michael Stalzer, Trial Attorney, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Rafael Antonio Rodriguez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We grant the petition for review and remand.

The BIA did not have the benefit of *Lozano-Arredondo v. Sessions,*866 F.3d 1082 (9th Cir. 2017), which set aside the BIA’s interpretation of 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(C) in *Matter of Cortez Canales,*25 I. *&*N. Dec. 301 (BIA 2010) (“within five years of admission” requirement for deportability on the basis of a crime involving moral turpitude conviction did not apply to cancellation of removal for non-permanent residents), when it denied cancellation of removal. Thus, we remand for further proceedings consistent with that disposition.

We do not reach the government’s contentions regarding Rodriguez’s alleged ineligibility for cancellation of removal under *Mancilla-Delafuente v. Lynch,*804 F.3d 1262 (9th Cir. 2015). *See Navas v. INS,*217 F.3d 646, 658 n.16 (9th Cir. 2000).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
# C_2008260EN.01S00301.xml

| 11.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 55

Authorizing expenditures by the Special Committee on Aging.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 17 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 1995

Mr. COHEN (for himself and Mr. PRYOR) submitted the following resolution,

which was referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

RESOLUTION

Authorizing expenditures by the Special Committee on Aging.

1 Resolved, That, in carrying out its powers, duties, and

2 functions under the Standing Rules of the Senate, in ac3 cordance with its jurisdiction under rule XXV of such

4 rules, including holding hearings, reporting such hearings,

5 and making investigations as authorized by paragraphs 1

6 and 8 of rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of the Senate,

7 the Special Committee on Aging is authorized from March

8 1, 1995, through February 29, 1996, and March 1, 1996,

9 through February 28, 1997, in its discretion—

10 (1) to make expenditures from the contingent

11 fund of the Senate,

12 (2) to employ personnel, and
2

•SRES 55 IS

1 (3) with the prior consent of the Government

2 department or agency concerned and the Committee

3 on Rules and Administration, to use on a reimburs4 able or nonreimbursable basis the services of person5 nel of any such department or agency.

6 SEC. 2. (a) The expenses of the committee for the

7 period March 1, 1995, through February 29, 1996, under

8 this resolution shall not exceed $1,046,685.

9 (b) For the period March 1, 1996, through February

10 28, 1997, expenses of the committee under this resolution

11 shall not exceed $1,070,031.

12 SEC. 3. The committee shall report its findings, to13 gether with such recommendations for legislation as it

14 deems advisable, to the Senate at the earliest practicable

15 date, but not later than February 29, 1996, and February

16 28, 1997, respectively.

17 SEC. 4. Expenses of the committee under this resolu18 tion shall be paid from the contingent fund of the Senate

19 upon vouchers approved by the chairman of the commit20 tee, except that vouchers shall not be required—

21 (1) for the disbursement of salaries of employ22 ees paid at an annual rate,

23 (2) for the payment of telecommunications pro24 vided by the Office of the Sergeant at Arms and

25 Doorkeeper, United States Senate,
3

•SRES 55 IS

1 (3) for the payment of stationery supplies pur2 chased through the Keeper of the Stationery, United

3 States Senate,

4 (4) for payments to the Postmaster, United

5 States Senate,

6 (5) for the payment of metered charges on

7 copying equipment provided by the Office of the Ser8 geant at Arms and Doorkeeper, United States Sen9 ate, or

10 (6) for the payment of Senate Recording and

11 Photographic Services.

12 SEC. 5. There are authorized such sums as may be

13 necessary for agency contributions related to the com14 pensation of employees of the committee from March 1,

15 1995, through February 29, 1996, and March 1, 1996,

16 through February 28, 1997, to be paid from the Appro17 priations account for ‘‘Expenses of Inquiries and Inves18 tigations’’.

Æ
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 6, 2010 

0429 

Order 

 

May 6, 2010 

140302 

ESCANABA PAPER COMPANY, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140302 

 COA: 286144 

Ct of Claims: 04-000227-MT 

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 19, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 58 (Friday, March 25, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 17084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06302]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL OP-OFA-009]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information 202-564-5632 or https://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
Filed March 14, 2022 10 a.m. EST Through March 21, 2022 10 a.m. EST
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20220036, Final, FERC, WY, Clear Creek Expansion Project, 
Review Period Ends: 04/25/2022, Contact: Office of External Affairs 
866-208-3372
EIS No. 20220037, Final, USN, MD, Testing and Training Activities in 
the Patuxent River Complex, Review Period Ends: 04/25/2022, Contact: 
Crystal Ridgell 301-757-5282
EIS No. 20220038, Final, FERC, WI, Wisconsin Access Project, Review 
Period Ends: 04/25/2022, Contact: Office of External Affairs 866-208-
3372
EIS No. 20220039, Final Supplement, AFRH, DC, Armed Forces Retirement 
Home Master Plan Update, Review Period Ends: 04/25/2022, Contact: 
Justin Seffens 202-541-7548

    Dated: March 21, 2022.
Cindy S. Barger,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2022-06302 Filed 3-24-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         March 23, 2022.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on March 8, 2022, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 737 to Competitive Product List*. Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2022-45, CP2022-51.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2022-06165 Filed 3-22-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  I, Michelle Gill, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K/A of GSR Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-10F (the "Exchange Act
     periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
     fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
     material respects; and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
     13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
     except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances
     of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     Bank of America, National Association as Servicer, Countrywide Home
     Loans Servicing LP as Servicer, IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. as Servicer, U.S.
     Bank, National Association as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master
     Servicer and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Securities Administrator.

     Dated: June 30, 2008

     /s/ Michelle Gill
     Michelle Gill, Vice President
     (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO

  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor

550 South Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334

  |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO  CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL  ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and SITUS HOLDINGS, LLC as Operating Advisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, COMM 2014-UBS5 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.              A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from September 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”),  and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2.              To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 6th day of March 2015.

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
Exhibit 10.3


 





November
___, 2017


 


	We Sell Cellular LLC	BST Distribution, Inc.
	171 Madison Avenue, 17th FL	171 Madison Avenue, 17th FL
	New York, NY 10016	New York, NY 10016
	Attention: Nikhil Raman, Manager	Attention: Nikhil Raman, Chairman







 


		Re:	Amendments
                                         to Employment Agreement



 


Dear
Nik:


 


Reference
is made in this Letter Agreement (the “Letter Agreement”) to the Employment Agreement dated October 23, 2015 (the
“Employment Agreement”), which I entered into with We Sell Cellular LLC and BST Distribution, Inc. I hereby acknowledge
and agree that Section 4(a) of the Employment Agreement, including the Schedules 4(a)(1)(A), 4(a)(1)(B), 4(a)(2),
and 4(a)(3) referenced therein, is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety by the following:


 


For
the services of the Executive to be rendered under this Agreement, the Company shall pay the Executive an annual salary of $250,000
(the “Base Salary”) payable in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll practices. Payment of Base Salary
may be made by either BST or We Sell.


 


I
further acknowledge and agree that Section 4(b) of the Employment Agreement, including the Schedules 4(b)(1) and 4(b)(2)
referenced therein, and Section 4(c) of the Employment Agreement are hereby deleted in their entirety, and Section 4(d) of
the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety by the following:


 


In
addition to any compensation received pursuant to this Section 4, the Company will reimburse or advance funds to the Executive
for all reasonable documented travel, meals, and lodging, entertainment and miscellaneous expenses incurred in connection with
the performance of his duties under this Agreement, provided that the Executive properly provides a written accounting
of such expenses to the Company in accordance with the Company’s practices. Such reimbursement or advances will be made
in accordance with policies and procedures of the Company in effect from time to time relating to reimbursement of, or advances
to, its executive officers, except that no policy shall change the terms of this Agreement.


 


[Signatures
to follow]


 






    	 



     


    

 





BST
Distribution, Inc.


We
Sell Cellular LLC


November
___, 2017


Page
2


 


Very
truly yours,


 


Acknowledged
and agreed:


 


BST
Distribution, Inc.


 


	By:	 









 


We
Sell Cellular LLC


 


	By:
    Nikhil Raman, Manager	 





 


cc:
Michael D. Harris, Esq.


 





[Signature
page to Letter Agreement re: Amendments to Employment Agreement]
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 160

A resolution marking the anniversary of the anti-Greek pogrom in Turkey,

on September 6, 1955.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 7 (legislative day, JULY 10), 1995

Mr. D’AMATO submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

A resolution marking the anniversary of the anti-Greek

pogrom in Turkey, on September 6, 1955.

Whereas, in September 1955, there existed a Greek minority

population of 100,000 in Istanbul, Turkey;

Whereas, on the night of September 6–7, 1955, a pogrom

against the Greek community began in Istanbul;

Whereas anti-Greek rioters attacked, pillaged, gutted and destroyed more than 2,000 Greek homes, 4,200 Greek

shops and stores, 73 Greek Orthodox churches, 52 Greek

schools, eight Greek cemeteries, all three major Greek

newspaper plants, and dozens of Greek factories, hotels,

restaurants, and warehouses in Istanbul;

Whereas 15 Greeks were killed in the pogrom or died subsequently, and 32 were seriously injured;
2

SRES 160 IS

Whereas as many as 200 women were raped by rioters;

Whereas the United States Consul General in Istanbul reported that police stood idly by or cheered on the rioting

mobs;

Whereas the State Department received confirmation of

‘‘elaborate advanced planning for widespread destruction

of the property of the indigenous Greek community,’’ involving careful preparations by many individuals;

Whereas American journalist Frederick Sondern, Jr., writing

at the time for Readers Digest, described the events of

that night as ‘‘. . . one of the wildest eruptions of mob

fury and hysteria in modern times . . .’’;

Whereas homes of Greek officers stationed at NATO headquarters in the Turkish city of Izmir were also attacked

and destroyed;

Whereas rioters attacked and burned down the Greek Consulate in Izmir and the Greek Pavilion at the Izmir International festival;

Whereas Turkish authorities failed at the time to convict a

single rioter, out of thousands, for any crime committed

during the pogrom;

Whereas five years later, after a military coup in Turkey, the

former Prime Minister and acting Foreign Minister at

the time of the pogrom were charged with, and convicted

of, numerous criminal actions, including the instigation

of the anti-Greek riots;

Whereas the pogrom marked the beginning of the end of the

Greek community’s presence in Istanbul, numbering

about 2,000 in 1995; and
3

SRES 160 IS

Whereas September 6, 1995 will mark the 40th Anniversary

of the pogrom: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the

2 President should—

3 (1) take all appropriate steps to observe and

4 commemorate the loss of life and property, and the

5 numerous injuries and offenses, which took place

6 during the pogrom by proclaiming September 6,

7 1995 as a day of remembrance for the victims of

8 these attacks; and

9 (2) urge all Americans to honor the victims of

10 the pogrom in the appropriate manner.

Æ