alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 136 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 136

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

            Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 136

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in consonance with section 132(a) of the Legislative 
Reorganization Act of 1946, when the House adjourns on the legislative 
day of Friday, August 1, 1997 or Saturday, August 2, 1997, pursuant to 
a motion made by the Majority Leader or his designee, it stand 
adjourned until noon on Wednesday, September 3, 1997, or until noon on 
the second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to 
section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and 
that when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on 
Thursday, July 31, 1997, Friday, August 1, 1997, or Saturday, August 2, 
1997, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority Leader or his designee 
in accordance with this concurrent resolution, it stand recessed or 
adjourned until noon on Tuesday, September 2, 1997, or until such time 
on that day as may be specified by the Majority Leader or his designee 
in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day 
after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, 
in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 31, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 31.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 302 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Patrick J. Goodman, certify that:
 
 1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofCE Casecnan Water and Energy Company; Inc.2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.

The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and5.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. 
 
 
 Date: August 3, 2004
 
 /s/ Patrick J. Goodman
 Patrick J. Goodman
 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 (chief financial officer)
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Compass Acquisition Corporation (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, the undersigned officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  November 24, 2009

/s/    Joseph R. Rozelle



JOSEPH R. ROZELLE

Principal Executive Officer

and Principal Financial Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7335** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. WAYNE PORTER , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte
. Richard L. Voorhees , District Judge. ( 3:85

- cr - 00062

- RLV

- 1; 3:14

- cv - 00373

- RLV )

Submitted : March 19, 2015 Decided: March 24, 2015

Before WILKINSON and SHEDD , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Wayne Porter, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Lee Edwards, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Wayne Porter seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his filing as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and dismissing it as successive
. * The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U .S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that
Porter has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma

* We reject Porter’s claim that his challenge was cognizable under former Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a). See United States v. Little , 392 F.3d 671, 678 (4th Cir. 2004).3 pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Exhibit 35.1




Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation









NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION




OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE




The undersigned, Mark Kaczynski, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows:




(1)           The undersigned has caused a review of the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the period October 15, 2014 through March 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 1, 1999, as amended and as supplemented by the 2014-B SUBI Servicing Supplement, dated as of October 15, 2014 (as supplemented, the “Agreement”), by and among Nissan-Infiniti LT, as titling trust, NILT Trust, as UTI beneficiary, and the Company, as servicer, to be conducted under his supervision; and




(2)           To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.




This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for publicly-issued asset-backed securities.  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 26th day of June, 2015.




/s/ Mark Kaczynski_________________


Mark Kaczynski


President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2005217EN.01000702.xml

| 3.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/7

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Grand Chamber)

of 21 July 2005

in Case C-231/03: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per la Lombardia: Consorzio Aziende Metano (Coname) v Comune di Cingia de' Botti (1)

1

(Articles 43 EC, 49 EC and 81 EC - Concession for the management of a public gas-distribution service)

(2005/C 217/14)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-231/03: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per la Lombardia (Lombardy Regional Administrative Court) (Italy), made by decision of 14 February 2003, received at the Court on 28 May 2003, in the proceedings between Consorzio Aziende Metano (Coname) and Comune di Cingia de' Botti, intervener: Padania Acque SpA — the Court (Grand Chamber), composed of V. Skouris, President, P. Jann, C.W.A. Timmermans (Rapporteur), A. Rosas, R. Silva de Lapuerta and A. Borg Barthet, Presidents of Chambers, R. Schintgen, S. von Bahr, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, G. Arestis, M. Ilešič, J. Malenovský and J. Klučka, Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; L. Hewlett, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 21 July 2005, in which it ruled:

Consorzio Aziende Metano (Coname)

Comune di Cingia de' Botti

Padania Acque SpA

Articles 43 EC and 49 EC preclude, in circumstances such as those at issue in the main proceedings, the direct award by a municipality of a concession for the management of the public gas-distribution service to a company in which there is a majority public holding and in the capital of which the municipality in question has a 0.97 % holding, if that award does not comply with transparency requirements which, without necessarily implying an obligation to hold an invitation to tender, are, in particular, such as to enable an undertaking located in the territory of a Member State other than that of the municipality in question to have access to appropriate information regarding that concession, so that, if that undertaking had so wished, it would have been in a position to express its interest in obtaining that concession.

---

(1)  OJ C 226 of 20.09.2003.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 194 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 194

        To authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 9, 1995

 Mr. Dole submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
        To authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel.

Whereas, in the case of Office of the United States Senate Sergeant at Arms v. 
        Office of Senate Fair Employment Practices, No. 95-6001, pending in the 
        United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the Office of 
        the Sergeant at Arms has sought review of a final decision of the Select 
        Committee on Ethics which had been entered, pursuant to section 308 of 
        the Government Employee Rights Act of 1991, 2 U.S.C. Sec. 1208 (1994), 
        in the records of the Office of Senate Fair Employment Practices;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(1) (1994), the 
        Senate may direct its counsel to defend committees of the Senate in 
        civil actions relating to their official responsibilities; and
Whereas, pursuant to section 303(f) of the Government Employee Rights Act of 
        1991, 2 U.S.C. Sec. 1203(f) (1994), for purposes of representation by 
        the Senate Legal Counsel, the Office of Senate Fair Employment 
        Practices, the respondent in this proceeding, is deemed a committee 
        within the meaning of sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the Ethics in 
        Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a), 288c(a)(1) (1994): 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is directed to represent 
the Office of Senate Fair Employment Practices in the case of Office of 
the Senate Sergeant at Arms v. Office of Senate Fair Employment 
Practices.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 192 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

  1st Session
S. RES. 192

A resolution making majority appointments to the Joint Committee on the 
              Library and the Joint Committee on Printing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 3, 1995

 Mr. Dole submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
A resolution making majority appointments to the Joint Committee on the 
              Library and the Joint Committee on Printing.

    Resolved, The following are named majority party members on the 
part of the Senate to the Joint Committee on the Library: Mr. Hatfield 
(chairman), Mr. Stevens, and Mr. Warner.
    The following are named majority party members on the part of the 
Senate to the Joint Committee on Printing: Mr. Warner (vice chairman), 
Mr. Hatfield, and Mr. Cochran.
                                 <all>
```
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 10:55 AM

To: 'gcgraphics316@gmail.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' Subject: Request for Additional Informatio n: Jesse Richard Walker (FAA-2015-1788)



### July 7, 2015

Dear Mr. Walker:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-1788). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, S ection 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operat ion please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request a ny further, we must receive the information described above by August 4, 2015. If we do not receiv e the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels Program Analyst

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, MARK McLEARY, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Candev Resource Exploration, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|Date:  January 25, 2008 | /s/ Mark McLeary
Mark McLeary
Chief Financial Officer
|----------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage Servicing**D1086-120, 12th Floor550 South Tyron StreetCharlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 **ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE** Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as General Special Servicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Master Servicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC,  as  Trust  Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C22 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that: 1. A review of the activities of the General Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015, (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.  /s/ Daniel BoberDaniel BoberExecutive Vice PresidentWells Fargo Bank   

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A |  (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------|