alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED: May 15, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

MULTI- AERO, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS No. FAA-2013- 0718 

HEARING NOTICE 

'. - ~ 

i__·_-:, 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered 

on July 22, 23, 24 and 25, 2014, inclusive, in the Courtroom 9.170, Thomas F. 

Eagleton, U.S. Courthouse; 111 South 10th Street, St. Louis, MO 63102. Hearings 

will commence at 9:00a.m. and conclude at 4:30p.m. each day. The parties shall vacate 

the courthouse on or before 5:00p.m. each day .. 

Settled cases will not be removed from the docket until the Judge receives the 

proper pleading(s). Pleadings1 may be forwarded by fax, express mail, courier or 

postal service2

• 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

1 Materials filed in the FAA Hearing Docket (except for materials which are sealed) also available for 

viewing at http://www.regulations.gov. For additional information see: http://dms.dot.gov. 2 The Administrator's civil penalty decisions, along with indexes of the decisions, the Rules of Practice, as 

well as other materials relating to civil penalty cases, are available on the internet at: 

http://www.faa.gov/abdut!office org/headquarters offices/age/pol adjudicationlagc400/civil penalty/: see 

also: http://ecfr. gpoaccess. gov/cgilt/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&tpl=!ecfrbrowse/Titlel 411 4tab 02. tpl. In 

addition, Thomson Reuters/West Publishing publishes Federal Aviation Decisions. Finally, the decisions 

are available through LEXIS (TRANS library) and WestLaw 9FTRAN-FAA database. For additional 

information, see the Web site. 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Shane Storz, Director of Operations 

Multi-Aero, Inc., Respondent 

12300 Old Tesson Road, Suite 200F 

St. Louis, MO 63128 

Jared M. Allen, Respondent's Counsel 

The Aviation Law Firm 

One Research Court, Suite 450 

. Rockville, MD 20850 

TEL: 301-294-8550 

FAX: 301-294-2525 

ONE COPY 

David B. Kessler, Complainant's Counsel 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-0718 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

Directorate Counsel, Office of Regional Counsel, Central Region, ACE-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

901 Locust Street, DOT Building, Room 506 

Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 

TEL: 816-329-3763 

FAX: 816-329-3771 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WJOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
# United States Court of Appeals **For the First Circuit**

No. 00-2091 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,
v. BRIAN EUGENE MESERVE, Defendant, Appellant.

The opinion of this court issued on November 16, 2001, should be amended as follows: On the cover sheet: replace "[Hon. George Z. Singal, U.S. District Judge ]" with "[Hon. Morton A. Brody, U.S. District Judge ]".
420 P.2d 583

#### STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Isaiah H. LAWSON, Appellant.

No. 2 CA-CR 67.

Court of Appeals of Arizona.

Dec. 7, 1966.

Darrell F. Smith, Atty. Gen., William J. Schafer, III, Pima County Atty., Carl Waag, Deputy Pima County Atty., Tucson, for appellee.

Charles M. Giles, Tucson, for appellant.

KRUCKER, Chief Judge.

Defendant, Isaiah H. Lawson, takes this appeal from a conviction in the Superior Court of Pima County, Arizona, on two counts of second degree burglary. The defendant was tried by a jury and was represented by court-appointed counsel at all times. Defendant was sentenced to a term in the Arizona State Prison of not less than two years nor more than three years on each count, said terms to run consecutively.

*341Defendant was a member of a shoplifting ring which went to stores, one member disti'acting the sales clerks, and another stealing the goods. Defendant’s practice was to stuff stolen merchandise into his baggy overalls.

Counsel for the defendant filed a motion in this Court to submit the appeal on the record, stating that he could find no suitable grounds or error upon which to base an appeal, and we have granted this motion.

Under the provisions of A.R.S. § 13-1715, subsec. B, this Court has examined the entire record, and we are satisfied that there is no fundamental error in the proceedings in the lower court. We find no violation of the appellant’s rights and no basis upon which a reversal could be based. State v. Burrell, 96 Ariz. 233, 393 P.2d 921 (1964); State v. Denmon, 3 Ariz.App. 217, 413 P.2d 276 (1966); State v. White, 2 Ariz.App. 455, 409 P.2d 739 (1966).

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

HATHAWAY and MOLLOY, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 99.1**




**AGGREGATE
      SCHEDULE OF PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST DISTRIBUTIONS TO CERTIFICATEHOLDERS**




Class
            Interest
            Principal
            Losses
            Ending
                BalanceI-A-1
            0.00
            0.00
            0.00
            100,000,000.00I-A-2
            0.00
            0.00
            0.00
            143,373,000.00I-A-3
            0.00
            0.00
            0.00
            7,150,000.00I-A-IO
            0.00
            0.00
            0.00
            250,523,000.00I-A-R
            0.00
            0.00
            0.00
            100.00II-A-1
            0.00
            0.00
            0.00
            56,067,000.00II-A-2
            0.00
            0.00
            0.00
            2,796,000.00II-A-IO
            0.00
            0.00
            0.00
            58,863,000.00III-A-1
            0.00
            0.00
            0.00
            27,051,000.00B-1
            0.00
            0.00
            0.00
            7,515,000.00B-2
            0.00
            0.00
            0.00
            2,097,000.00B-3
            0.00
            0.00
            0.00
            1,399,000.00B-4
            0.00
            0.00
            0.00
            699,000.00B-5
            0.00
            0.00
            0.00
            699,000.00B-6
            0.00
            0.00
            0.00
            699,323.06
No. 10-930.

#### Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections *v.*Valencia Gonzales.

C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 565 U. S. 1259.] Motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned, Robert S. Herlin, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Natural Gas Systems, Inc. (the "Company"), certifies in connection with the
filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report")")
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
and for the periods covered in the Report.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
14th day of November, 2005.

                                /s/ ROBERT S. HERLIN
                                --------------------------------
                                Robert S. Herlin
                                Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Natural Gas Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Natural Gas
Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request. The foregoing certificate is being furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to this Form 10-QSB and shall
not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-QSB.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 23, 2022)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 16365]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06275]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2022 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 16365]]

                Memorandum of March 16, 2022

                
Delegation of Authority Under Section 506(a)(1) 
                of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including section 621 of the Foreign 
                Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA), I hereby delegate to the 
                Secretary of State the authority under section 
                506(a)(1) of the FAA to direct the drawdown of up to an 
                aggregate value of $800 million in defense articles and 
                services of the Department of Defense, and military 
                education and training, to provide assistance to 
                Ukraine and to make the determinations required under 
                such section to direct such a drawdown.

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, March 16, 2022

[FR Doc. 2022-06275
Filed 3-22-22; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
# L_2013235EN.01S00302.xml

| 4.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 235/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 235/s3

---

NOTE TO READERS — WAY OF REFERRING TO ACTS

As of 1 July 2013 the way of referring to acts has changed.

During a transitional period this new practice will coexist with the previous one.

---
No. 11-1085.

#### Amgen Inc. et al. *v.*Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
# Official Journal C 20A/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.020.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 20A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5525 January 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.020.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 20A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5525 January 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2012/C 020A/01 | Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/194/10 — Lawyer-linguists (AD 7) — English language (EN) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2012/C 020A/01

Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/194/10 — Lawyer-linguists (AD 7) — English language (EN)

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 8 | (DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 10 | |
| 17 | (LT) |
| 20 | (EN) |

8

(DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL)

10

17

(LT)

20

(EN)

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 758 

AN ACT 

To amend Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 

to improve attorney accountability, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 758 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lawsuit Abuse Reduc3 tion Act of 2015’’. 

4 SEC. 2. ATTORNEY ACCOUNTABILITY. 

5 (a) SANCTIONS UNDER RULE 11.—Rule 11(c) of the 

6 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is amended— 

7 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘may’’ and in8 serting ‘‘shall’’; 

9 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘Rule 5’’ and 

10 all that follows through ‘‘motion.’’ and inserting 

11 ‘‘Rule 5.’’; and 

12 (3) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘situated’’ 

13 and all that follows through the end of the para14 graph and inserting ‘‘situated, and to compensate 

15 the parties that were injured by such conduct. Sub16 ject to the limitations in paragraph (5), the sanction 

17 shall consist of an order to pay to the party or par18 ties the amount of the reasonable expenses incurred 

19 as a direct result of the violation, including reason20 able attorneys’ fees and costs. The court may also 

21 impose additional appropriate sanctions, such as 

22 striking the pleadings, dismissing the suit, or other 

23 directives of a non-monetary nature, or, if warranted 

24 for effective deterrence, an order directing payment 

25 of a penalty into the court.’’. 
3 

•HR 758 EH

1 (b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this Act 

2 or an amendment made by this Act shall be construed to 

3 bar or impede the assertion or development of new claims, 

4 defenses, or remedies under Federal, State, or local laws, 

5 including civil rights laws, or under the Constitution of 

6 the United States. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 17, 

2015. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 758 

AN ACT 

To amend Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil 

and for other purposes. Procedure to improve attorney accountability,
#### David B. TURNER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-55446

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed December 26, 2017

David B. Turner, Jr., Pro Se

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R, App. P, 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

David B. Turner, Jr., a former prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to pay the filing fee after denying Turner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) while he was in jail. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s interpretation and application of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). *Harris v. Mangum,*863 F.3d 1133, 1138 (9th Cir. 2017). We affirm.

The district court properly denied Turner’s motion to proceed IFP because at the time Turner filed the complaint, Turner had filed three actions or appeals that qualified as “strikes,” and Turner did not plausibly allege that he was “under imminent danger of serious physical injury” at the time he lodged the complaint or the appeal. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); *Harris,*863 F.3d, at 1143 (“[W]hen (1) a district court dismisses a complaint on the ground that it fails to state a claim, (2) the court grants leave to amend, and (3) the plaintiff then fails to file an amended complaint, the dismissal' counts as a strike under § 1915(g).”); *Richey v. Dahne,*807 F.3d 1202, 1208 (9th Cir. 2015) (appellate court’s denial of IFP because the appeal is frivolous counts as a “strike” even though the court does not dismiss the appeal until later, after appellant fails to pay the filing fee).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid- ■ ed by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

NAM NHAT NGO, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-55169 

D.C. Nos. 3:16-cv-01555-GPC 

3:97-cr-03397-GPC 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Gonzalo P. Curiel, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 27, 2018**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

The stay issued in this appeal on January 26, 2018, is lifted.

Nam Nhat Ngo appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and 

we affirm.

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 5 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-55169 

Ngo contends that his armed bank robbery convictions under 18 U.S.C. 

§ 2113(a), (d) do not qualify as a predicate crimes of violence under 18 U.S.C. 

§ 924(c). This argument is foreclosed. See United States v. Watson, 881 F.3d 782 

(9th Cir.), cert. denied, 139 S. Ct. 203 (2018).

Appellee’s motion for summary affirmance is denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 733 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to require households that 

receive supplemental nutrition assistance benefits to present photographic 

verification at the time food is purchased with such benefits. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2015 

Mr. SALMON (for himself, Mr. GOSAR, Mr. BRIDENSTINE, Mr. LONG, Mr. 

DESANTIS, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, Mrs. LUMMIS, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, 

and Mr. POE of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to require 

households that receive supplemental nutrition assistance 

benefits to present photographic verification at the time 

food is purchased with such benefits. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘SNAP Verify Act of 

5 2015’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 733 IH

1 SEC. 2. PHOTOGRAPHIC VERIFICATION FOR SNAP TRANS2 ACTIONS. 

3 Section 11 of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 

4 (7 U.S.C. 2020) is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(w) PHOTOGRAPHIC VERIFICATION FOR SNAP 

7 TRANSACTIONS.—Not later than 3 years after the effec8 tive date of this subsection, the State agency shall require 

9 any member of a household, or any representative of the 

10 household, authorized to use an electronic benefit card to 

11 present photographic identification at the time such mem12 ber or such representative presents the electronic benefit 

13 card to perform a transaction.’’. 

14 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT. 

15 (a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act and the amend16 ment made by this Act shall take effect on the 1st day 

17 of the 1st month that begins not less than 1 year after 

18 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

19 (b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.—The amendment 

20 made by this Act shall not apply with respect to certifi21 cation periods that begin before the effective date of this 

22 Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Official Journal C 253/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.253.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 253 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5430 August 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.253.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 253

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5430 August 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 253/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6303 — Antin Infrastructure Partners FCPR/RREEF Pan European Infrastructure Fund LP/Andasol-1 Central Termosolar Uno SA and Andasol-2) (1) | 1 |
| 2011/C 253/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6194 — Osram/Siteco Lighting) (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2011/C 253/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6303 — Antin Infrastructure Partners FCPR/RREEF Pan European Infrastructure Fund LP/Andasol-1 Central Termosolar Uno SA and Andasol-2) (1)

1

2011/C 253/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6194 — Osram/Siteco Lighting) (1)

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 253/03 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| 2011/C 253/04 | Commission Decision of 29 August 2011 setting up a Payment Systems Market Expert Group | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2011/C 253/03

Euro exchange rates

2

2011/C 253/04

Commission Decision of 29 August 2011 setting up a Payment Systems Market Expert Group

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 253/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6296 — Triton/COMPO) (1) | 6 |
| 2011/C 253/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6363 — Dalkia Polska/SPEC) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 7 |
| 2011/C 253/07 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6267 — Volkswagen/MAN) (1) | 8 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2011/C 253/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6296 — Triton/COMPO) (1)

6

2011/C 253/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6363 — Dalkia Polska/SPEC) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

7

2011/C 253/07

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6267 — Volkswagen/MAN) (1)

8

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN