alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|          |          
|--------- | ---------
|<PAGE> 43 | Form 10-Q

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Patricia
F. Russo, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Lucent Technologies Inc. (the
Company), and Frank A. DAmelio, Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | the Quarterly Report on
  Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2005
  (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | (2) | the information contained
  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
  condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                   

Date: February 8, 2006

|                                       | 
|-------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Patricia F. Russo                  | 
|                                       | 
|Patricia F. Russo                     
|Chairman and Chief
  Executive Officer

|                                          | 
|----------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Frank A. DAmelio                     | 
|                                          | 
|Frank A. DAmelio                        
|Chief Operating Officer,
  Executive Vice
|President and Chief
  Financial Officer  

---
#### Harold BOYD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Miller PIPELINE, Defendant-Appellee, and Candice S. Walker, Ogletree Deakins, Defendant.

No. 17-1885

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 18, 2018

Decided: January 22, 2018

*206Harold Boyd, Appellant Pro Se, Homer Bernard Tisdale, III, OGLETREE DEA-KINS NASH SMOAK *&*STEWART, PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Harold Boyd appeals the district court’s order granting Miller Pipeline’s dispositive motions and dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction Boyd’s employment discrimination suit, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Boyd v. Miller Pipeline,*No. 3:16-cv-00278-FDW-DSC (W.D.N.C. July 13, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 91 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 91

  To delay enforcement of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 
 until such time as Congress appropriates funds to implement such Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Coverdell introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
         referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To delay enforcement of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 
 until such time as Congress appropriates funds to implement such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL VOTER REGISTRATION ACT IMPLEMENTATION.

    The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C. 1973gg et 
seq.) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating section 13 as section 14;
            (2) by inserting after section 12, the following new 
        section 13:

``SEC. 13. FEDERAL FUNDING.

    ``(a) In General.--The Attorney General shall make grants to the 
States sufficient to implement this Act.
    ``(b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out this section.''; 
and
            (3) by amending section 14--
                    (A) in paragraph (1)--
                            (i) in subparagraph (A), by striking 
                        ``or'';
                            (ii) by striking ``and'' at the end of 
                        subparagraph (B), and inserting ``or''; and
                            (iii) by adding the following new 
                        subparagraph:
                    ``(C) 180 days after the date on which Congress 
                appropriates funds pursuant to section 13(b); and''; 
                and
                    (B) by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows:
            ``(2) with respect to any State not described in paragraph 
        (1), the later of--
                    ``(A) January 1, 1995; or
                    ``(B) 180 days after the date on which Congress 
                appropriates funds pursuant to section 13(b).''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------

        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 - CHIEF EXECUTIVE
                      OFFICER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Nevstar Gaming and Entertainment
Corporation  (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30,
2005, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I,  Timothy  P.  Halter,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and Chief
Accounting Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



                              /s/ Timothy P. Halter
                             -------------------------------

                             Timothy P. Halter
                             Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                             November 9, 2005

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise adopting,  the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 981

Entitled the ‘‘Truck Safety and Congressional Partnership Act’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 28 (legislative day, JUNE 19), 1995

Mr. EXON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

Entitled the ‘‘Truck Safety and Congressional Partnership

Act’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be referred to as the ‘‘Truck Safety

5 and Congressional Partnership Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. SINGLE TRAILER LENGTH.

7 Any Federal regulatory standard for single trailer

8 length issued pursuant to negotiations and procedures au9 thorized under the North American Free Trade Agree10 ment, shall not exceed fifty-three feet.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      35,333,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,749,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   192,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            43,999,000
<PP&E>                                      10,105,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,395,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              57,293,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,959,000
<BONDS>                                      1,192,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  49,129,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                57,293,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            25,557,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               33,109,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                94,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                30,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              77,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,390,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,624,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,766,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 198,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,568,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.30)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.9



                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

         I, Anthony A. Scalese, Vice President of Finance and Principal
Accounting Officer of QualMark Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(3)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly
         period ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(4)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated: August 13, 2002



                                                    /s/ Anthony A. Scalese
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Anthony A. Scalese
                                                    Vice President of Finance &
                                                    Principal Accounting Officer
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Helaine M. Kaplan,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed inrespect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the COMM 2014-UBS6Mortgage Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

KeyBank NationalAssociation, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank,National Association, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Trustee and Certificate Administrator, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Custodian, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as OperatingAdvisor, and Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC, as Primary Servicer.

 

 

 

Dated: March 19, 2018

 

 

/s/ Helaine M. Kaplan

 

 

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00618-CV

A-L Creekside Town Center, L.P.; and City of New Braunfels, Texas, Appellants

v.

New Braunfels IH-35 Retail Associates, L.P., Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. C2008-0805A, HONORABLE DIB WALDRIP, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellants, A-LCreeksideTown Center, L.P. and City of New Braunfels, Texas, and

appellee, New Braunfels IH-35 Retail Associates, L.P., have jointly filed with this Court an agreed

motion to dismiss the appeal, informing the Court that they have settled their dispute. The parties

state that Retail Associates, plaintiff in the trial court, has agreed to dismiss the City from its lawsuit

and has entered into a settlement agreement with Creekside. The parties move that we dismiss the

appeal and remand to the district court for further proceedings to effectuate the settlement agreement.

We grant the parties’ agreed motion, dismiss the appeal, and remand to the trial court for further

proceedings consistent with the parties’ agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1.
2

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Pemberton and Waldrop

Dismissed and Remanded

Filed: July 7, 2009
Exhibit 31:  Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification

Re: Morgan Stanley IXIS Real Estate Capital Trust 2006-2 (the "Trust")

I, Valerie Kay, Vice President of Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc. certify
that:

1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form
10-K of the Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole,
 do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered
by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.  Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in
this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the
Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations
under the servicing agreements; and

5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
 asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment
of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
 on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Countrywide Home Loans
Servicing LP, and Deutsche Bank.

Date: March 30, 2007

/s/ Valerie Kay
By: Valerie Kay
Title: Vice President
#### Kevin Deon BRAZIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jeffrey A. BEARD; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-15898

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted November 15, 2017 *

Filed November 22, 2017

Kevin Deon Brazier, Pro Se

Diana N. Chinn, Litigation Counsel, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, Suzanne Antley, Deputy Attorney General, Michelle Des Jardins, Attorney, AGCA — Office of the Attorney General (San Diego) San Diego, CA, for Defendants-Appellees Jeffrey A. Beard, Kathleen Dickinson, K. Holland, S. Reed, J. Gutierrez, R. B. Hughes,. J. Branch, S. Schlanger, A. Landou

Diana N. Chinn, Litigation Counsel, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Defendant-Appellee A. Landon

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Kevin Deon Brazier appeals pro se from the district *692court’s summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action arising from defendants’ failure to grant him a kosher diet. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Williams v. Paramo,*775 F.3d 1182, 1191 (9th Cir. 2015). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Brazier failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether he properly exhausted administrative remedies, or whether administrative remedies were effectively unavailable to him. *See Ross v. Blake,*— U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 1850, 1858-60, 195 L.Ed.2d 117 (2016) (describing limited circumstances under which administrative remedies are deemed unavailable); *Woodford v. Ngo,*548 U.S. 81, 90, 126 S.Ct. 2378, 165 L.Ed.2d 368 (2006) (“[P]roper exhaustion of administrative remedies ...' means using all steps that the agency holds out, and doing so properly (so that the agency addresses the issues on the merits).” (citation, internal quotation marks, and emphasis omitted)).

We do not consider matters not specifically'and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                       LORAL SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS LTD.

          COMPUTATION OF DEFICIENCY OF EARNINGS TO COVER FIXED CHARGES
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)
                                  (UNAUDITED)

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                 SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                                     JUNE 30,
                                                              ----------------------
                                                                2001         2000
                                                              ---------    ---------
<S>                                                           <C>          <C>
Income (loss) before income taxes, equity in net loss of
  affiliates, minority interest and cumulative effect of
  change in accounting principle............................  $ (71,382)   $  11,656
Plus fixed charges:
  Interest expense..........................................    107,559       92,232
  Interest component of rent expense(1).....................      8,575        7,350
Less: capitalized interest..................................     11,115        6,480
                                                              ---------    ---------
Earnings available to cover fixed charges...................  $  33,637    $ 104,758
                                                              =========    =========
Fixed charges(2)............................................  $(172,951)   $(135,063)
                                                              =========    =========
Deficiency of earnings to cover fixed charges...............  $(139,314)   $ (30,305)
                                                              =========    =========
</Table>

---------------

(1) The interest component of rent expense is deemed to be approximately 25% of
    total rent expense.

(2) Preferred dividends have not been adjusted for income taxes, due to the
    composition of the taxing jurisdictions underlying the Company's operations
    and the resulting impact on the Company's effective tax rate.