alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit  35 a) SPS LOGO****Agreement:     See Schedule of Agreements Dated: See Attached Schedule **ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE******In accordance with the applicable section in each of the Pooling****and Servicing Agreements specified: i. a review of the activities of the Servicer during the year ended December 31, 2006****and of performance under this Agreement has been made under such officers' supervision; and ii. to the best of such officers' knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations and no default has occurred under this Agreement throughout such year. February 24, 2007 /s/ Matthew L. Hollingsworth Matthew L. Hollingsworth Chief Executive Officer  Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. Asset Backed Securities Corporation, Depositor, DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc., Seller, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., Servicer, Officetiger Global Real Estate Services Inc., Loan Performance Advisor and U.S. Bank National Association, Trustee -  Pooling And Servicing Agreement Asset Backed Securities Corporation Home Equity Loan Trust, Series AMQ 2006-HE7 11/1/2006
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 77 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 77

    To provide for the appointment of additional immigration judges.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2015

 Ms. Jackson Lee introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide for the appointment of additional immigration judges.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Justice for Children Now Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL IMMIGRATION JUDGES.

    (a) In General.--The Attorney General may appoint 70 additional 
immigration judges in addition to immigration judges currently serving 
as of the date of enactment of this Act.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this section.
                                 <all>
```
419 P.2d 547

#### James L. EVANS, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona, and Evans Tire, Inc., Respondents.

No. 1 CA-IC 96.

Court of Appeals of Arizona.

Nov. 2, 1966.

Gorey & Ely, by Stephen S. Gorey, Phoenix, for petitioner.

Robert K. Park, Chief Counsel, by Howland F. Hirst, Arthur B. Parsons, Jr., Phoenix, of counsel for respondents.

CAMERON, Judge.

The petitioner experienced an industrial incident on 6 February 1964. He did not seek medical treatment. During a routine physical examination on 9 December 1964, his physician discovered a hernia. At the time of the examination, the petitioner did not advise his physician as to the industrial incident.

On 12 January 1965, the petitioner filed his claim with the Industrial Commission and the Commission held the hernia to not be compensable. The proper procedures were followed and this matter is before us for review.

It is our opinion that the petitioner has not brought himself within the tests set forth in Section 23-1043 A.R.S., and that the case of Morris v. Industrial Commission, *2873 Ariz.App. 393, 414 P.2d 996 (1966) is not applicable to the petitioner’s claim.

The award is affirmed.

STEVENS, C. J., and DONOFRIO, J., concur. '
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1007/2004

of 19 May 2004         

amending the import duties in the rice sector

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 3072/95 of 22 December 1995 on the common organisation of the market in rice (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1503/96 of 29 July 1996 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 3072/95 as regards import duties in the rice sector (2), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annexes I and II to Regulation (EC) No 963/2004 are hereby replaced by Annexes I and II to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 20 May 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 May 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 329, 30.12.1995, p. 18. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 411/2002 (OJ L 62, 5.3.2002, p. 27).

(2)OJ L 189, 30.7.1996, p. 71. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2294/2003 (OJ L 340, 24.12.2003, p. 12).

(3)OJ L 178, 13.5.2004, p. 8.

----

ANNEX I

Import duties on rice and broken rice

----

(1)  The duty on imports of rice originating in the ACP States is applicable, under the arrangements laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 2286/2002 (OJ L 348, 21.12.2002, p. 5) and amended Commission Regulation (EC) No 638/2003 (OJ L 93, 10.4.2003, p. 3).

(2)  In accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1706/98, the duties are not applied to products originating in the African, Caribbean and Pacific States and imported directly into the overseas department of Réunion.

(3)  The import levy on rice entering the overseas department of Réunion is specified in Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 3072/95.

(4)  The duty on imports of rice not including broken rice (CN code 1006 40 00), originating in Bangladesh is applicable under the arrangements laid down in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3491/90 (OJ L 337, 4.12.1990, p. 1) and amended Commission Regulation (EEC) No 862/91 (OJ L 88, 9.4.1991, p. 7).

(5)  No import duty applies to products originating in the OCT pursuant to Article 101(1) of amended Council Decision 91/482/EEC (OJ L 263, 19.9.1991, p. 1).

(6)  For husked rice of the Basmati variety originating in India and Pakistan, a reduction of EUR/t 250 applies (Article 4a of amended Regulation (EC) No 1503/96).

(7)  Duties fixed in the Common Customs Tariff.

(8)  The duty on imports of rice originating in and coming from Egypt is applicable under the arrangements laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 2184/96 (OJ L 292, 15.11.1996, p. 1) and Commission Regulation (EC) No 196/97 (OJ L 31, 1.2.1997, p. 53).

----

ANNEX II

Calculation of import duties for rice

----

(1)  Duties fixed in the Common Customs Tariff.

----
#### Autry Lee JONES, Petitioner-Appellant v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent-Appellee

No. 17-20006

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed November 22, 2017

Autry Lee Jones, Pro Se

Jessica Michelle Manojlovich, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Texas, Austin, TX, for Respondent-Appellee

Before PRADO, ELROD, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

*355PER CURIAM: *

Autry Lee Jones, former Texas prisoner # 325804 and former federal prisoner # 52873-080, moves for a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 application challenging his 1981 Texas habitual offender sentence for possession of a controlled substance. He argues that the district court erred by dismissing as time barred his claim that he is “actually innocent” of the habitual offender enhancement.

We must examine the basis of our jurisdiction sua sponte if necessary. *Mosley v. Cozby,*813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). Because Jones has previously filed at least one unsuccessful § 2254 challenge to the instant conviction and sentence, the district court should have dismissed the instant § 2254 application as an- unauthorized successive, and this court lacks jurisdiction over the instant appeal. *United States v. Key,*205 F.3d 773, 774-75 (5th Cir. 2000); 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). Accordingly, we DISMISS this appeal for lack of jurisdiction and DENY AS MOOT Jones’s motion for a COA.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
HRTMENTOF 

•mmKim 

SERVED JUNE 7, 2011 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

EMPIRE FLIGHT ACADEMY 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2011-0290 

ORDER OF CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE 

GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

By motion dated June 6, 2011, Complainant moved for an extension of time to answer 

Respondent's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Complainant states that Respondent had 

indicated it had no objection to the extension. For good cause shown, Complainant's motion is 

granted. Complainant's answer to Respondent's motion may be filed on or before June 24, 2011. 

SO ORDERED. 

lonnie A. Yode: 

Chief Administrative LawMdge 
* ' !^ •s^M 

i'A-. ^/, Fpm m FAA-2011 -0290 

(Civil Perialty Action) 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AlJ 

Wilbur Wright BuildingONE COPY (VIA FIRST-Odf 

Gregory S. Winton, Respondent's Couns^ 

The Aviation Law Firm 

One Research Court, Suitse450 

Rockville, MD 20850 

TEL: 301^294-8550 ,. s>l^, 

FAX: 301-294-2525 

Zachary M. Herman, Complainant's Cot 

Offioe of j^ltifgional Counsel, AEA-.?,. 

Eastern Region 

Federal Avia|iQn Administration ; ,, 

1 Aviation Plit^a, Room 561 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3258 

FAX: 718-533-5699 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation ' 

Office of Heaijiigs, M-20, Room £12^31! 

i ^ e New'Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Wiashingtor^ DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2142 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service WfliSt)y U.S. Mail. For servicftjtoj 

Aviation A(^^itiiation, 600 Indi0pendeQC9,'j£( 

DC 20591; Atj^tipn: Hearing Docket Clerik, M 

ir-' 

rESYCdS^BVFAX) 

Bf?i'-

:^.i ! 

':.'eiOX t> I.--

^MM'Ml'V 

•'• ^ 

H *i! T^CTHmM 

^l^^M (. j^jiSiKaKlflK 

y '• ^H^SKS S 

;'/ >^'>%lagBl^B 

'.''^^ ^ '"'1 

^^iMH 

'l^^i^H^HI m|HH ^^^1 

W^^^KB^^ ji" 

H^TM?^'"^f?-. 

BIMJ^^^ X *gd^ 

[l^teSv 

K^«":;. 

H^^M". 

H|^^4^' ^ 

^^^H^^u^^l'"" 

m/l^kp.l 

^•H^sSKSSla^' ^|^HJHn[^vs9 the folloy^ii 

^HHH|p3itig--^uii)-2^# 

1^1^ : Federal 

lip5i^»hington, 

fM'''-.
# Official Journal C 424/23 N

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 424 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6123 November 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 424

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6123 November 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 424/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 424/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-24-00176-CR

Genevieve Pauline GOLDEN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022CR11545

Honorable Andrew Carruthers, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 12, 2024

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Appellant, acting pro se, filed a notice of appeal on February 28, 2024, purporting to appeal

from a conviction and sentence imposed on October 7, 2022. Thereafter, the trial court clerk filed 

the clerk’s record. The clerk’s record does not contain a final judgment of conviction. “With 

certain exceptions . . . , this court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal filed by a criminal 

defendant only after a final judgment of conviction.” Zamarripa v. State, No. 04-16-00274-CR, 

2016 WL 3085932, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio June 1, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op., not 

designated for publication) (citing TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 44.02); accord McKown v. State, 
04-24-00176-CR

- 2 -

915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no pet.) (“Generally, we only have 

jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal defendant where there has been a judgment of 

conviction.”).

On April 11, 2024, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal should 

not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant did not respond. Accordingly, this appeal is 

dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 44.02; McKown, 915 S.W.2d 

161; Zamarripa, 2016 WL 3085932, at *1.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned executive officers of Mayflower Bancorp, Inc. (the Registrant) hereby certify that this Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By:

/s/ Edward M. PrattName:

Edward M. PrattTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ Maria VafiadesName:

Maria VafiadesTitle:

Chief Financial Officer


Date: July 23, 2010
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of FFD Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Trent
B. Troyer, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.




/s/ Trent B. Troyer
-------------------------------------
Trent B. Troyer
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to FFD Financial Corporation and will be retained by FFD Financial
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Martin BARCENAS-PATINO, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-50156 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 21, 2017

*286Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Kristin L, Davidson, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Maureen Scott Franco, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Martin Barcenas-Patino appeals his sentence of 48 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release for illegal reentry after deportation. He argues that the district court erroneously determined that his sentence was subject to an enhancement under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). He asserts that his indictment did not allege that he had a prior conviction and that, therefore, the enhancement violated his due process rights because his sentence exceeded the statutory maximum.

The Government has filed an unopposed motion for summary affirmance, asserting that *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), forecloses Barcenas-Patino’s argument. Barcenas-Patino concedes that his argument was rejected in *Almendarez-Torres*and explains that he raises it to preserve it for further review; thus, summary affirmance is appropriate. *See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis,*406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969).

Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED. The judgment is AFFIRMED, The Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED,

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5994 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend biodiesel and 

renewable diesel incentives. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2016 

Mrs. BLACK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

biodiesel and renewable diesel incentives. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Biodiesel and Renew5 able Diesel Incentive Extension Act of 2016’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF BIODIESEL AND RENEWABLE DIE7 SEL INCENTIVES. 

8 (a) INCOME TAX CREDIT.—Subsection (g) of section 

9 40A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5994 IH

1 by striking ‘‘December 31, 2016’’ and inserting ‘‘Decem2 ber 31, 2018’’. 

3 (b) EXCISE TAX INCENTIVES.— 

4 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 6426(c)(6) of such 

5 Code is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2016’’ 

6 and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2018’’. 

7 (2) PAYMENTS.—Section 6427(e)(6)(B) of such 

8 Code is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2016’’ 

9 and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2018’’. 

10 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 this section shall apply to fuel sold or used after December 

12 31, 2016. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Citizens First Financial Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dallas
G. Smiley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (3) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (4) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

|    |  |                                                          | 
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ |  | Dallas G. Smiley                                        
|   
|   
|    |  | Dallas G. Smiley
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002

23
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 214 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con. Res.214
                                      Agreed to October 12, 1998        

                       One Hundred Fifth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  eight

                          Concurrent Resolution

 

Whereas the cities of Bristol, Tennessee, and Bristol, Virginia, have 
  long been a gathering place for musicians from the nearby mountainous 
  countryside;

Whereas phonographic recordings made in Bristol in August of 1927 
  launched the careers of the Carter Family and Jimmie Rodgers, who are 
  recognized as the first commercially successful modern Country Music 
  artists;

Whereas these recordings have been called the ``Big Bang of Country 
  Music'' by the Country Music Foundation in its publication ``Country, 
  the Music and the Musicians'';

Whereas Jimmie Rodgers has been named the Father of Country Music and 
  was the first artist to be inducted into the Country Music Hall of 
  Fame;

Whereas the original members of the Carter Family have been recognized 
  as Country Music's First Family in part because their works have had 
  an unparalleled influence on succeeding generations of Country Music 
  artists;

Whereas ``The Roots of Country Music'', a three-part television series 
  which aired nationally on the Turner Broadcasting System in June of 
  1996, recognized the significant contribution of the cities of 
  Bristol to the development and commercial acceptance of Country 
  Music;

Whereas in 1984 the Tennessee Senate recognized Bristol as the 
  ``Birthplace of Country Music''; and

Whereas in 1995, the Virginia General Assembly recognized Bristol as 
  the ``Birthplace of Country Music'': Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
        (1) recognizes the critical contributions of the cities of 
    Bristol, Tennessee, and Bristol, Virginia, and their residents to 
    the origins and development of Country Music;
        (2) congratulates the cities of Bristol, Tennessee, and 
    Bristol, Virginia, for launching with the Bristol recordings of 
    1927 the careers of the Nation's first widely known Country Music 
    artists; and
        (3) acknowledges and commends the cities of Bristol, Tennessee, 
    and Bristol, Virginia, as the birthplace of Country Music, a style 
    of music which has enjoyed broad commercial success in the United 
    States and throughout much of the world.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```