alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          13,849
<SECURITIES>                                    14,087
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,967
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,547
<PP&E>                                           6,250
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  58,116
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,400
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           199
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,322
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    58,116
<SALES>                                         36,668
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,668
<CGS>                                           10,448
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,218
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (745)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,805)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       209
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,014)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,014)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)
        

</TABLE>
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 156

Recognizing the contributions of the United States Army Air Forces to

the United States victory in World War II.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 26 (legislative day, JULY 10), 1995

Mr. THURMOND submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Armed Services

RESOLUTION

Recognizing the contributions of the United States Army

Air Forces to the United States victory in World War II.

Whereas in World War II, the United States Army Air

Forces played a decisive role in turning the tide of war

both in Europe and the Pacific.

Whereas the price for this role in victory was high, with more

than 50,000 Army Air Forces personnel killed in combat.

Whereas the strategic air campaign of the Army Air Forces

in Europe during World War II successfully crippled the

industrial and economic infrastructure and communications and transportation networks of Germany.

Whereas the Army Air Forces supported ground forces and

gained air supremacy in the skies over the beaches of the
2

•SRES 156 IS

D-Day invasion of Europe, an operation that set the

stage for the downfall of the Third Reich.

Whereas in August 1942, the Army Air Forces commenced

air operations that established air supremacy in the

Southwest Pacific, thereby contributing significantly to

victory in the battles for New Guinea and the Philippines.

Whereas the Army Air Forces supported the strategic and

tactical thrusts of the Armed Forces across the central

Pacific, the Aleutians, and the China-Burma-India Theater: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) recognizes the courage, sacrifice, and devo3 tion to duty of the personnel of the United States

4 Army Air Forces in World War II; and

5 (2) recognizes the outstanding and critical con6 tribution of the Army Air Forces to the worldwide

7 victory of the United States in World War II.

Æ
Untitled Document


 

 Exhibit
  10.3 

 CONSENT
  OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS 

      We hereby consent
  to the use in this Registration Statement on Form 20-F of our reports dated
  February 19, 2002, relating to the financial statements of Sanofi~Synthélabo,
  which appear in such Registration Statement. 

      Paris, France

       June 25,
  2002 

      Befec – Price
  Waterhouse

       Member of PricewaterhouseCoopers 

       

/s/ Jacques
  Denizeau

  Jacques Denizeau
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald Joseph SCHWINDT, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 17-30078, 17-30079

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed December 21, 2017

*351Jared Charles Cobell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USGF — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Great Falls, MT, Leif Johnson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the US Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee

Andrew J. Nelson, Esquire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, FDMT — Federal Defenders of Montana (Missoula) Missou-la, MT, for Defendant-Appellant

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

In these consolidated appeals, Donald Joseph Schwindt appeals the seven-month concurrent sentences imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Schwindt argues that the district court erred when it determined that he had violated supervised release by committing criminal trespass under Montana Code Annotated section 45-6-203. He contends that this error resulted in a substantively unreasonable sentence. The government rightly concedes that, because it presented no evidence that the land was posted, it did not establish that Schwindt had criminally trespassed. *See State v. Trujillo,*342 Mont. 319, 180 P.3d 1153, 1156 (2008). We nevertheless affirm.

Schwindt admits that the court correctly calculated the Guidelines range on the basis of his commission of another Grade C violation. There is no evidence in the record that the district court relied upon the trespass violation in reaching its sentencing decision. Instead, the court found that the seven-month sentence was appropriate because of Schwindt’s repeated failure to abide by the terms of his supervised release despite his probation officer’s guidance. Under these circumstances, the court’s error with respect to the trespassing violation was harmless. Moreover, the below-Guidelines. sentence was substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances. *See Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
# Official Journal C 86/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 86 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6412 March 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 86

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6412 March 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2021/C 86/01 | Position (EU) No 2/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Customs programme for cooperation in the field of customs and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2013 Adopted by the Council on 1 March 2021 | 1 |
| 2021/C 86/02 | Statement of Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 2/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Customs programme for cooperation in the field of customs and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2013 | 18 |

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COUNCIL

2021/C 86/01

Position (EU) No 2/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Customs programme for cooperation in the field of customs and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2013 Adopted by the Council on 1 March 2021

1

2021/C 86/02

Statement of Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 2/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Customs programme for cooperation in the field of customs and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2013

18

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

(Adopted February 4, 1977)(Amended February 1, 1980)

(Amended April 1, 1977)(Amended July 11, 1980)

(Amended August 4, l978)(Amended October 15, 1982)

(Amended September 7, 1979)(Amended March 2, 1984)

Rule 401. VISIBLE EMISSIONS

(a) A person shall -not discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of 

emission whatsoever any air contaminant for a period or periods aggregating 

more than three minutes in any one hour which is:

(1) As dark or darker in shade as that designated No. I on the Ringelmann 

Chart, as published by the United States Bureau of Mines, or

(2) Of such Opacity as to obscure an observer's view to a degree equal to or 

greater than does smoke described in subsection (a)(1) of this rule.

(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a) of this rule, a person shall not 

discharge into the atmosphere from equipment for melting, heating, or holding 

asphalt or coal tar pitch for on-site roof construction or repair; or from diesel pile 

driving hammers; any air contaminant for a period or periods aggregating more 

than three minutes in any one hour which is:

(1) As dark or darker in shade as that designated No. 2 on the Ringelmann 

Chart, as published by the United States Bureau of Mines, or

(2) Of such an opacity as to obscure an observer's view to a degree equal to or 

greater than does smoke described in subsection (b)(1) of this rule.

(c) This rule shall not apply to asphalt pavement heaters.

(d) This rule shall not apply to abrasive blasting operations.

401 - 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

WARREN DAMUS

, 1

Respondent Below,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF SERIVCES FOR

, CHILDREN, YOUTH, AND THEIR

FAMILIES (DSCYF/DFS)

Petitioner Below,

Appellee. §

§ No. 1 38 , 2019

§

§ Court Below

— Family Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ File No s

. C N16

- 03689

§ 17

- 10

- 12TN

§ Pet

. No s

. 16

- 16922

§ 17

- 32689

§

§

Submitted: November 6, 2019

Decided: November 12 , 2019

Before S EITZ , Chief Justice; VAUGHN and TRAYNOR

, Justices.

O R D E R

This 12th day of November , 2019, after careful consideration of the parties’

briefs and the record on appeal, it appears to the Court that the judgment of the

Family Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons stated in its

March 4, 2019 Order.

1 The Court previously assigned a pseudonym to the appellant under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Family

Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor

Justice
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Homeland Security Capital Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section            1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
| 1.           | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                   |
|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|    |                                                                                                                                                |
| 2.           | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. |
|              | **HOMELAND SECURITY CAPITAL CORPORATION** |
|-------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|              |                                      |   |
|              |                                      |   |
| November 14, 2008 | By:                                       | /s/ C. Thomas McMillen |
|              | Name:                                     | C. Thomas McMillen |
|              | Title:                                    | Chief Executive Officer |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Homeland Security Capital Corporation and will be retained by Homeland            Security Capital Corporation and furnished to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.
# EUR-Lex - 32004D0144 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32004D0144

**2004/144/EC: Commission Decision of 12 February 2004 amending Decision 97/467/EC as regards the inclusion of establishments in Bulgaria and Hungary in provisional lists of third country establishments from which Member States authorise imports of ratite meat (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2004) 346) **

*
Official Journal L 047 , 18/02/2004 P. 0033 - 0034 *

Commission Decision

of 12 February 2004

amending Decision 97/467/EC as regards the inclusion of establishments in Bulgaria and Hungary in provisional lists of third country establishments from which Member States authorise imports of ratite meat

(notified under document number C(2004) 346)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2004/144/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Decision 95/408/EC of 22 June 1995 on the conditions for drawing up, for an interim period, provisional lists of third country establishments from which Member States are authorised to import certain products of animal origin, fishery products or live bivalve molluscs(1), and in particular Article 2(1) and (4) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Provisional lists of establishments in third countries from which the Member States authorise imports of ratite meat have been drawn up by Commission Decision 97/467/EC(2).

(2) Bulgaria and Hungary have sent lists of establishments producing ratite meat for which the responsible authorities certify that the establishments comply with the Community rules.

(3) Those establishments should be included in the lists drawn up by Decision 1997/467/EC.

(4) As on-the-spot inspections have not yet been carried out, imports from such establishments are not eligible for reduced physical checks in accordance with Article 2(4) of Decision 95/408/EC.

(5) Decision 97/467/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.

(6) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Annex II to Decision 97/467/EC is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision shall apply from 25 February 2004.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 February 2004.

For the Commission

David Byrne

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 243, 11.10.1995, p. 17. Decision as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 806/2003 (OJ L 122, 16.5.2003, p. 1).

(2) OJ L 199, 26.7.1997, p. 57. Decision as last amended by Decision 2002/797/EC (OJ L 277, 15.10.2002, p. 23).

ANNEX

Annex II is amended as follows:

1. The following text is inserted in Annex II in the part concerning Bulgaria in accordance with the national reference:

">TABLE>"

2. The following text is inserted in Annex II in the part concerning Hungary in accordance with the national reference:

">TABLE>"
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>                      
    THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS ON PAGES 3 THROUGH 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY
PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO 
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001005530
<NAME>                        Merit Behavioral Care Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         53,176
<SECURITIES>                                   4,111
<RECEIVABLES>                                  35,607
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,754
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               97,670
<PP&E>                                         104,738
<DEPRECIATION>                                 29,386
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 352,221
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          101,588
<BONDS>                                        256,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       286
<OTHER-SE>                                     (28,757)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   352,221
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               405,130
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  327,739
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               20,133
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             18,651
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,764)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,904)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,860)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,860)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit
13.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Gazit-Globe Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31,
2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Adi Jemini, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
    as amended; and   
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                             
| | (2) | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.



|Dated:
    April 27, 2017   | 
|--------------------------- | 
|                            | 
|/s/
    Adi Jemini          | 
|Adi
    Jemini              | 
|Chief
    Financial Officer |
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF PATINA OIL & GAS CORPORATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.ss.1350



1. I, Thomas J. Edelman, Chief Executive Officer of Patina Oil & Gas Corporation (the Company), hereby certify to the best of my knowledge that the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ending September 30, 2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Report) by the Company fully complies with the requirements
of that section.



2. I further certify to the best of my knowledge that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Thomas J. EdelmanName:

Thomas J. EdelmanDate:

October 28, 2004




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
document.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Patina Oil & Gas Corporation and will be retained by Patina Oil & Gas Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operation of the Company.
 HOMELAND SECURITY CAPITAL CORPORATIONNovember 16, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Michael T. BriganteName:
    Michael T. BriganteTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 1, 2011

p0525 

# Order

June 1, 2011

141966

BATES ASSOCIATES, L.L.C., Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141966 COA: 288826 Wayne CC: 08-113819-CK 132 ASSOCIATES, L.L.C., Defendant-Appellee,

and

SAULT STE. MARIE TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 14, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 138

To correct technical errors in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 2014.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 31, 1997

Mr. ARCHER submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To correct technical errors in the enrollment of the bill

H.R. 2014.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R.

3 2014), to provide for reconciliation pursuant to sub4 sections (b)(2) and (d) of section 105 of the concurrent

5 resolution on the budget for fiscal year 1998, the Clerk

6 of the House of Representatives shall make the following

7 corrections:

8 (1) In the amendment proposed to be added by

9 section 1085(c), strike ‘‘section 407(d)’’ and insert

10 ‘‘paragraph (4) or (7) of section 407(d)’’.

Æ