alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6474 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6474

 To eliminate the daily newspaper cross-ownership rule of the Federal 
                       Communications Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 7, 2016

  Mr. Walden (for himself, Mr. Yarmuth, Mr. Gene Green of Texas, Mr. 
    Rush, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Olson, and Mr. Guthrie) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To eliminate the daily newspaper cross-ownership rule of the Federal 
                       Communications Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF DAILY NEWSPAPER CROSS-OWNERSHIP RULE.

    (a) No Force or Effect.--Paragraph (d) of section 73.3555 of title 
47, Code of Federal Regulations, shall have no force or effect after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Removal From Rules.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Federal Communications Commission shall 
complete all actions necessary to remove such paragraph from its rules.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99.2
CERTIFICATION  OF  CHIEF  FINANCIAL  OFFICER

                                VILLAGEWORLD.COM
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  VillageWorld.Com,  (the "Small
Business  Issuer") on Amendment #2 to Form 10-QSB for the three-month period and
six  month  period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"), I, Celia I. Schiffner, Chief
Financial  Officer  of  VillageWorld.Com,  certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

     1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
15  (d)  of  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2)     The  information  contained  in  the  Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Small  Business  Issuer.

/s/  Celia  I.  Schiffner
-------------------------
Celia  I.  Schiffner
Chief  Financial  Officer
February  12,  2004
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 141

To commend the bravery and honor of the citizens of Remy, France, for

their actions with respect to Lieutenant Houston Braly and to recognize

the efforts of the 364th Fighter Group to raise funds to restore the

stained glass windows of a church in Remy.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 1, 1997

Mrs. TAUSCHER (for herself, Mr. FROST, Mrs. KELLY, Mr. HOLDEN, Mr.

HINOJOSA, Mr. SNYDER, Mrs. MEEK of Florida, Mr. STENHOLM, Mr.

SISISKY, Ms. FURSE, Mr. BROWN of California, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr.

CUNNINGHAM, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. SMITH of Texas,

Ms. BROWN of Florida, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr.

BARTON of Texas, and Mr. LIPINSKI) submitted the following concurrent

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To commend the bravery and honor of the citizens of Remy,

France, for their actions with respect to Lieutenant

Houston Braly and to recognize the efforts of the 364th

Fighter Group to raise funds to restore the stained glass

windows of a church in Remy.

Whereas on August 2, 1944, a squadron of P–51s from the

United States 364th Fighter Group strafed a German

munitions train in Remy, France;

Whereas the resulting explosion killed Lieutenant Houston

Braly, one of the attacking pilots, and destroyed much of
2

• HCON 141 IH

the village of Remy, including 7 stained glass windows in

the 13th Century church;

Whereas, despite threats of reprisals from the occupying German authorities, the citizens of Remy recovered Lieutenant Braly’s body from the wreckage, buried his body with

dignity and honor in the church’s cemetery, and decorated the grave site daily with fresh flowers;

Whereas on Armistice Day, 1995, the village of Remy renamed the crossroads near the site of Lieutenant Braly’s

death in his honor;

Whereas the surviving members of the 364th Fighter Group

desire to express their gratitude to the brave citizens of

Remy; and

Whereas, to express their gratitude, the surviving members of

the 364th Fighter Group have organized a nonprofit corporation to raise funds, through its project ‘‘Windows for

Remy’’, to restore the church’s stained glass windows:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress commends the bravery and

3 honor of the citizens of Remy, France, for their actions

4 with respect to the American fighter pilot Lieutenant

5 Houston Braly during and after August 1944, and that

6 the Congress recognizes the efforts of the surviving mem7 bers of the United States 364th Fighter Group to raise

8 funds to restore the stained glass windows of Remy’s 13th

9 Century church.

Æ
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of LoralSpace & Communications Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q forthe period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Richard J. Townsend, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuantto § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Richard J. Townsend           Richard J. Townsend *Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer*May 8, 2006
#### David Ross WHITLOW, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Harold CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-6992

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 25, 2018

Decided: February 12, 2018

Jonathan P. Sheldon, SHELDON, FLOOD & HAYWOOD, PLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellant. Eugene Paul Murphy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Ross Whitlow seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The ■ order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or *wrong. Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Whitlow has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
### -88 -86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

34 36 38 40 42


## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/22 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 22 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JOHN DE HERRERA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-50527

D.C. No. 2:08-cr-01085-CBM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Consuelo B. Marshall, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 23, 2010** 

Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 

John De Herrera appeals pro se from the bench-trial conviction and 24-

month unsupervised probationary sentence imposed for committing the

misdemeanor offenses of: (1) commemorative installation of a structure in a

federal park area without authorization; and (2) tampering with property in a

FILED

SEP 03 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-50527

federal park, in violation of 36 C.F.R. §§ 2.62(a) and 2.31(a)(2).

De Herrera admits to committing the offenses, but contends that the

conviction should be set aside based on his defense of necessity. The district court

correctly concluded that there was no evidence to support De Herrera’s necessity

defense. Accordingly, this contention lacks merit. See United States v. PerdomoEspana, 522 F.3d 983, 987 (9th Cir. 2008).

AFFIRMED.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 869

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

DRAGONESSA, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 869 ES

1 SECTION 1. VESSEL DOCUMENTATION.

2 Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

3 Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 883), section 8 of the Act of

4 June 19, 1886 (24 Stat. 81, chapter 421; 46 U.S.C. App.

5 289), and section 12106 of title 46, United States Code,

6 the Secretary of Transportation may issue a certificate of

7 documentation with appropriate endorsement for employ8 ment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

9 DRAGONESSA, United States official number 646512.

Passed the Senate July 29, 1996.

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 869

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to

for other purposes.wise trade for the vessel DRAGONESSA, andpriate endorsement for employment in the coastissue a certificate of documentation with appro-
EXHIBIT 31.1
 RULE
13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a)
CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed the this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this quarterly report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, s made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and
 c.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 b.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date:  November 19, 2009
    By:
    /s/ David Bruce HongDavid Bruce HongChief Executive Officer
Exhibit
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Great East Bottles & Drinks (China)
Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of the undersigned’s knowledge:
 
 (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period
certified.
 
 
 Signed on
this March 23, 2010
 
 /s/ Danny PoonName:
      Danny PoonTitle:  Chief
      Financial Officer and
                Acting
      Principal Accounting Officer
Exhibit 31

                                  CERTIFICATION

I. Matthew Kaltenrieder, certify that:

1. l have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form
10-K of NovaStar Mortgage Funding Trust, Series 2006-6 (the "Exchange Act
periodic reports");

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole,
do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this
report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange
Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the
servicing agreement; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of
noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on
Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank National
Association, as Custodian and Deutsche Bank National Trust Compnay, as Trustee.


Date: March 22, 2007             /s/ Matthew Kaltenrieder
                                 ------------------------
                                 Matthew Kaltenrieder
                                 Vice President
**Exhibit
      24.1**





**POWER
      OF ATTORNEY**





Each
      person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints Andrew
      Intrater and Michael Sloan, and each of them, as his true and lawful attorney
      or
      attorneys-in-fact and agent or agents, with the full power of substitution
      and
      resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on his behalf
      in his or her capacity as an officer and/or a member of the board of directors
      of Columbus Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “ Company ”),
      the
      Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, and
      any or all amendments thereto, and to file the same with all exhibits thereto
      and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
      the
      regulations promulgated thereunder, granting unto said attorney or
      attorneys-in-fact, and each of them with or without the other, full power and
      authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary
      to be done in and about the premises in order to effectuate the same as fully
      to
      all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying
      and
      confirming all that said attorney or attorneys-in-fact, or either of them or
      their or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done
      by
      virtue thereof.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
      as
      of March 20, 2008.





/s/
                Andrew IntraterAndrew
                Intrater/s/
                Michael SloanMichael
                Sloan/s/
                Michael W. ErnestusMichael
                W. Ernestus/s/
                Barry J. RourkeBarry
                J. Rourke/s/
                Eric ZachsEric
                Zachs/s/
              Rolf ZimmermannRolf
              Zimmermann/s/
                Jason LustigJason
                Lustig
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golden Elephant Glass Technology, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Lin
Tan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

June 10, 2011

/S/ Lin TanLin TanChief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer)

---
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 32002R1607

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1607/2002 of 10 September 2002 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables***Official Journal L 243 , 11/09/2002 P. 0005 - 0006*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1607/2002

of 10 September 2002

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1498/98(2), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in the Annex thereto.

(2) In compliance with the above criteria, the standard import values must be fixed at the levels set out in the Annex to this Regulation,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 September 2002.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 September 2002.

For the Commission

J. M. Silva Rodríguez

Agriculture Director-General

(1) OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66.

(2) OJ L 198, 15.7.1998, p. 4.

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 10 September 2002 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

>TABLE>
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

The undersigned executive officer of FirstFederal Bancshares of Arkansas, Inc. (the “Registrant”) hereby certifies thatthe Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the three months and nine months ended September30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a or 15d of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained thereinfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.

 

 
|                    | /s/Sherri R.  Billings       |   |
|-------------------------|------------------------------|--------|
|                    | Sherri R.  Billings          |
|                    | EVP/Chief  Financial Officer |
|                    |                         |
| Date:  October 27, 2004 |                         |

 

----