# Official Journal L 200/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 200 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 601 August 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 200

English edition

Legislation

Volume 601 August 2017

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1405 of 31 July 2017 amending Regulation (EC) No 847/2006 as regards the Union's tariff quotas for certain prepared or preserved fish originating in Thailand | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1406 of 31 July 2017 determining the location of the ground-based infrastructure of the EGNOS system (
  1
  ) | 4 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1405 of 31 July 2017 amending Regulation (EC) No 847/2006 as regards the Union's tariff quotas for certain prepared or preserved fish originating in Thailand

1

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1406 of 31 July 2017 determining the location of the ground-based infrastructure of the EGNOS system (
  1
  )

1

4

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.

---

II Non-legislative acts

REGULATIONS

| 1.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 200/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 200/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/1405

of 31 July 2017

amending Regulation (EC) No 847/2006 as regards the Union's tariff quotas for certain prepared or preserved fish originating in Thailand

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Decision 2006/324/EC of 27 February 2006 on the conclusion of an Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Community and the Kingdom of Thailand pursuant to Article XXIV:6 and Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions in the schedules of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic in the course of their accession to the European Union (1), and in particular Article 2 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 847/2006 (2) introduced from 2 June 2006 two annual tariff quotas for duty-free imports of certain prepared or preserved fish. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 847/2006 (2) introduced from 2 June 2006 two annual tariff quotas for duty-free imports of certain prepared or preserved fish.

| (2) | In accordance with the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Community and the Kingdom of Thailand, attached to Decision 2006/324/EC, a certain volume of each of those tariff quotas was allocated to the Kingdom of Thailand and the remainder was opened to imports from all countries. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In accordance with the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Community and the Kingdom of Thailand, attached to Decision 2006/324/EC, a certain volume of each of those tariff quotas was allocated to the Kingdom of Thailand and the remainder was opened to imports from all countries.

| (3) | A country-specific tariff quota is allocated on the basis of the non-preferential origin of the goods. The indication of this non-preferential origin is to be included in the declaration for release for free circulation in the Union. In some cases that declaration must be supported by a proof of origin issued by the competent authorities in the country of origin. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

A country-specific tariff quota is allocated on the basis of the non-preferential origin of the goods. The indication of this non-preferential origin is to be included in the declaration for release for free circulation in the Union. In some cases that declaration must be supported by a proof of origin issued by the competent authorities in the country of origin.

| (4) | In accordance with Regulation (EC) No 847/2006, the benefit of the share of the tariff quotas allocated to Thailand is subject to the presentation of a certificate of origin meeting the conditions laid down in Article 47 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 (3). |
| --- | --- |

(4)

In accordance with Regulation (EC) No 847/2006, the benefit of the share of the tariff quotas allocated to Thailand is subject to the presentation of a certificate of origin meeting the conditions laid down in Article 47 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 (3).

| (5) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/481 (4) repealed Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 with effect from 1 May 2016. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/481 (4) repealed Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 with effect from 1 May 2016.

| (6) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 (5), in force since 1 May 2016, no longer contains a procedure for issuing and presenting a certificate of origin comparable to the procedure applied until 30 April 2016 in accordance with Article 47 of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 (5), in force since 1 May 2016, no longer contains a procedure for issuing and presenting a certificate of origin comparable to the procedure applied until 30 April 2016 in accordance with Article 47 of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93.

| (7) | Imports into the Union of prepared and preserved fish originating in Thailand that benefit from the tariff quotas opened by Regulation (EC) No 847/2006 are subject to the presentation of a Common Veterinary Entry Document (CVED) in accordance with the conditions laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 136/2004 (6). The procedure for issuing the CVED provides sufficient guarantees as to the origin of the prepared or preserved fish. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

Imports into the Union of prepared and preserved fish originating in Thailand that benefit from the tariff quotas opened by Regulation (EC) No 847/2006 are subject to the presentation of a Common Veterinary Entry Document (CVED) in accordance with the conditions laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 136/2004 (6). The procedure for issuing the CVED provides sufficient guarantees as to the origin of the prepared or preserved fish.

| (8) | In addition, customs authorities may require the declarant to prove the origin of the goods in accordance with Article 61 of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (7). This allows for other means of proof than a formal certificate and ensures that the relevant rules are applied properly. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

In addition, customs authorities may require the declarant to prove the origin of the goods in accordance with Article 61 of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (7). This allows for other means of proof than a formal certificate and ensures that the relevant rules are applied properly.

| (9) | Therefore, the requirement to present a specific certificate of origin in order to benefit from the tariff quotas for the goods concerned originating in Thailand should be deleted from Regulation (EC) No 847/2006. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

Therefore, the requirement to present a specific certificate of origin in order to benefit from the tariff quotas for the goods concerned originating in Thailand should be deleted from Regulation (EC) No 847/2006.

| (10) | Rules on the management of tariff quotas are laid down in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 replacing from 1 May 2016 the rules in Articles 308a to 308d of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93. Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 847/2006 should be amended to take account of the new rules. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

Rules on the management of tariff quotas are laid down in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 replacing from 1 May 2016 the rules in Articles 308a to 308d of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93. Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 847/2006 should be amended to take account of the new rules.

| (11) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Customs Code Committee, |
| --- | --- |

(11)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Customs Code Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Articles 3 and 4 of Regulation (EC) No 847/2006 are replaced by the following:

‘Article 3

The origin shall be determined in accordance with the provisions in force in the Union.

Article 4

The tariff quotas set out in this Regulation shall be managed in accordance with Articles 49 to 54 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 (*1).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 31 July 2017.

For the Commission

The President

Jean-Claude JUNCKER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 120, 5.5.2006, p. 17.

1

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 847/2006 of 8 June 2006 opening and providing for the administration of Community tariff quotas for certain prepared or preserved fish (OJ L 156, 9.6.2006, p. 8).

2

(3)  Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ L 253, 11.10.1993, p. 1).

3

(4)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/481 of 1 April 2016 repealing Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ L 87, 2.4.2016, p. 24).

4

(5)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 of 24 November 2015 laying down detailed rules for implementing certain provisions of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the Union Customs Code (OJ L 343, 29.12.2015, p. 558).

5

(6)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 136/2004 of 22 January 2004 laying down procedures for veterinary checks at Community border inspection posts on products imported from third countries (OJ L 21, 28.1.2004, p. 11).

6

(7)  Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (OJ L 269, 10.10.2013, p. 1).

7

---

DECISIONS

| 1.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 200/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 200/4

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2017/1406

of 31 July 2017

determining the location of the ground-based infrastructure of the EGNOS system

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1285/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on the implementation and exploitation of European satellite navigation systems and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 876/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 683/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1), and particularly Article 12(3)(c) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The EGNOS system belongs to the European Union pursuant to Article 6 of Regulation (EU) No 1285/2013. Its full acquisition by the Union on 1 April 2009 was the subject of correspondence between the European Space Agency and the Commission on 24 March and 31 March 2009, and was approved by the Commission decision of 31 March 2009 (2). In the letter sent to the European Space Agency on 31 March 2009, the Commission stated that it was accepting the assets in their de facto and de jure condition. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The EGNOS system belongs to the European Union pursuant to Article 6 of Regulation (EU) No 1285/2013. Its full acquisition by the Union on 1 April 2009 was the subject of correspondence between the European Space Agency and the Commission on 24 March and 31 March 2009, and was approved by the Commission decision of 31 March 2009 (2). In the letter sent to the European Space Agency on 31 March 2009, the Commission stated that it was accepting the assets in their de facto and de jure condition.

| (2) | The ground infrastructure of the EGNOS system comprises a coordination centre for system operations, mission control centres, ranging and integrity monitoring stations, stations for communication with the geostationary satellites, a service centre and a secure data transmission network. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The ground infrastructure of the EGNOS system comprises a coordination centre for system operations, mission control centres, ranging and integrity monitoring stations, stations for communication with the geostationary satellites, a service centre and a secure data transmission network.

| (3) | The coordination centre for system operations underpins the EGNOS system because it manages the operational activities and system maintenance. It has been located in Toulouse (France) since 2004, i.e. prior to the Union's acquisition of the system. There is no need to reconsider this location if it meets the needs of the programme, takes advantage of the public investments already granted to it and fulfils the safety requirements in coordination with the Member State on whose territory the coordination centre for system operations is situated. Furthermore, transfer to a different location would incur costs and may disrupt the functioning of the system. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The coordination centre for system operations underpins the EGNOS system because it manages the operational activities and system maintenance. It has been located in Toulouse (France) since 2004, i.e. prior to the Union's acquisition of the system. There is no need to reconsider this location if it meets the needs of the programme, takes advantage of the public investments already granted to it and fulfils the safety requirements in coordination with the Member State on whose territory the coordination centre for system operations is situated. Furthermore, transfer to a different location would incur costs and may disrupt the functioning of the system.

| (4) | The role of the two mission control centres is to constantly monitor and control the state and functioning of the system. They have been located in Ciampino (Italy) and Torrejon (Spain) since 2004 and 2003 respectively, i.e. prior to the Union's acquisition of the system. There is no need to reconsider these two locations if they meet the needs of the programme, take advantage of the public investments already granted to them and fulfil the safety requirements in coordination with the Member State on whose territory the mission control centres are situated. Furthermore, transfer to different locations would incur costs and may disrupt the functioning of the system. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The role of the two mission control centres is to constantly monitor and control the state and functioning of the system. They have been located in Ciampino (Italy) and Torrejon (Spain) since 2004 and 2003 respectively, i.e. prior to the Union's acquisition of the system. There is no need to reconsider these two locations if they meet the needs of the programme, take advantage of the public investments already granted to them and fulfil the safety requirements in coordination with the Member State on whose territory the mission control centres are situated. Furthermore, transfer to different locations would incur costs and may disrupt the functioning of the system.

| (5) | The role of the ranging and integrity monitoring stations (RIMS) is to monitor the smooth functioning of the global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) at local level. They take real-time measurements of the disparities between the geolocation data derived from the signals emitted by these systems and their own reference location, which is extremely precise. The choice of their location takes account above all of the technical need for harmonious geographical distribution over all the territories covered by the EGNOS system, but also of the possible presence of pre-existing installations and equipment, and observes security requirements in coordination with the Member States and third countries on whose territory they are situated. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The role of the ranging and integrity monitoring stations (RIMS) is to monitor the smooth functioning of the global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) at local level. They take real-time measurements of the disparities between the geolocation data derived from the signals emitted by these systems and their own reference location, which is extremely precise. The choice of their location takes account above all of the technical need for harmonious geographical distribution over all the territories covered by the EGNOS system, but also of the possible presence of pre-existing installations and equipment, and observes security requirements in coordination with the Member States and third countries on whose territory they are situated.

| (6) | The number and location of the RIMS stations may evolve depending on the state of progress of the programme, its needs and above all the extension of system coverage in full compliance with the third subparagraph of Article 2(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1285/2013. They may also be changed in accordance with the results of the security risk analyses, particularly in the case of RIMS stations situated in third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

The number and location of the RIMS stations may evolve depending on the state of progress of the programme, its needs and above all the extension of system coverage in full compliance with the third subparagraph of Article 2(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1285/2013. They may also be changed in accordance with the results of the security risk analyses, particularly in the case of RIMS stations situated in third countries.

| (7) | Navigation land earth stations (NLES) send the corrected data to the EGNOS transponders installed on the geostationary satellites. This enables the recipients of the GNSS signals in the areas covered by the EGNOS system to make suitable corrections to their positioning. There are two NLES stations for each geostationary satellite. The choice of location essentially reflects the technical requirements, in particular the need to establish a local connection between the EGNOS system equipment and the signal transmission equipment belonging to the operators of the geostationary satellites on which the EGNOS transponders are installed. However, it also takes account of compliance with the security requirements. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

Navigation land earth stations (NLES) send the corrected data to the EGNOS transponders installed on the geostationary satellites. This enables the recipients of the GNSS signals in the areas covered by the EGNOS system to make suitable corrections to their positioning. There are two NLES stations for each geostationary satellite. The choice of location essentially reflects the technical requirements, in particular the need to establish a local connection between the EGNOS system equipment and the signal transmission equipment belonging to the operators of the geostationary satellites on which the EGNOS transponders are installed. However, it also takes account of compliance with the security requirements.

| (8) | The number and location of NLES stations may evolve depending on the state of progress and needs of the programme, and above all depending on the lifetime of the EGNOS transponders installed on the geostationary satellites currently in orbit and the choice of satellites onto which the future transponders will be embarked. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

The number and location of NLES stations may evolve depending on the state of progress and needs of the programme, and above all depending on the lifetime of the EGNOS transponders installed on the geostationary satellites currently in orbit and the choice of satellites onto which the future transponders will be embarked.

| (9) | The purpose of the service centre is, on the one hand, to monitor the quality of the signals and data sent by the transponders installed on the geostationary satellites and, on the other hand, to act as an interface with EGNOS users It also disseminates commercial data from the EDAS service referred to in Article 2(5)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1285/2013. The service centre has been located in Torrejon (Spain) since 2004, i.e. prior to the Union's acquisition of the system. There is no need to reconsider this location if it meets the needs of the programme, takes advantage of the public investments already granted to it and fulfils the safety requirements in coordination with the Member State on whose territory the service centre is situated. Furthermore, transfer to a different location would incur costs and may disrupt the functioning of the system. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

The purpose of the service centre is, on the one hand, to monitor the quality of the signals and data sent by the transponders installed on the geostationary satellites and, on the other hand, to act as an interface with EGNOS users It also disseminates commercial data from the EDAS service referred to in Article 2(5)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1285/2013. The service centre has been located in Torrejon (Spain) since 2004, i.e. prior to the Union's acquisition of the system. There is no need to reconsider this location if it meets the needs of the programme, takes advantage of the public investments already granted to it and fulfils the safety requirements in coordination with the Member State on whose territory the service centre is situated. Furthermore, transfer to a different location would incur costs and may disrupt the functioning of the system.

| (10) | In order to ensure a secure interconnection in real time for all components of the ground infrastructure of the EGNOS system, they are connected to each other by the EWAN network (‘EGNOS wide area network’), a secure data transmission network specifically dedicated to the system. Due to the physical characteristics of this network, it would not be possible to determine its location and specify it in this decision. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

In order to ensure a secure interconnection in real time for all components of the ground infrastructure of the EGNOS system, they are connected to each other by the EWAN network (‘EGNOS wide area network’), a secure data transmission network specifically dedicated to the system. Due to the physical characteristics of this network, it would not be possible to determine its location and specify it in this decision.

| (11) | The location of the coordination centre for system operations, the mission control centres, RIMS stations, NLES stations and service centre constituting the ground infrastructure of the EGNOS system should be approved. |
| --- | --- |

(11)

The location of the coordination centre for system operations, the mission control centres, RIMS stations, NLES stations and service centre constituting the ground infrastructure of the EGNOS system should be approved.

| (12) | The measures provided for in this Decision are in line with the opinion of the committee established pursuant to Article 36(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1285/2013, |
| --- | --- |

(12)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in line with the opinion of the committee established pursuant to Article 36(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1285/2013,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The location of the coordination centre for system operations, mission control centres, ranging and integrity monitoring stations, stations for communication with the geostationary satellites and service centre constituting the ground infrastructure of the EGNOS system shall be set out in the Annex.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 31 July 2017.

For the Commission

The President

Jean-Claude JUNCKER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 1.

1

(2)  C(2009) 2386.

2

---

ANNEX

| Name | Site |
| --- | --- |
| Coordination centre for system operations | Toulouse (France) |
| Mission control centres | Ciampino (Italy), Torrejon (Spain) |
| Ranging and integrity monitoring stations (RIMS) | Aalborg (Denmark), Abou Simbel (Egypt), Azores (Portugal), Agadir (Morocco), Al'Aqaba (Jordan), Alexandria (Egypt), Athens (Greece), Berlin (Germany), Catania (Italy), Ciampino (Italy), Cork (Ireland), Djerba (Tunisia), Egilsstadir (Iceland), Gavle (Sweden), Glasgow (UK), Golbasi (Turkey), Gran Canaria (Spain), Haifa (Israel), Hartebeeshoek (South Africa), Jan Mayen (Norway), Kiev (Ukraine), Kirkenes (Norway), Kourou (France), Kuusamo (Finland), Lappeenranta (Finland), La Palma (Spain), Lisbon (Portugal), Madeira (Portugal), Malaga (Spain), Moncton (Canada), Nouakchott (Mauritania), Oran (Algeria), Palma de Mallorca (Spain), Paris (France), Reykjavik (Iceland), Santiago de Compostela (Spain), Sofia (Bulgaria), Svalbard (Norway), Swanwick (UK), Toulouse (France), Tromsø (Norway), Trondheim (Norway), Warsaw (Poland), Zurich (Switzerland) |
| Navigation land earth stations (NLES) | Aussaguel (France), Betzdorf (Luxembourg), Burum (Netherlands), Cagliari (Italy), Fucino (Italy), Rambouillet (France), Redu (Belgium) |
| Service centre | Torrejon (Spain) |

Name

Site

Coordination centre for system operations

Toulouse (France)

Mission control centres

Ciampino (Italy), Torrejon (Spain)

Ranging and integrity monitoring stations (RIMS)

Aalborg (Denmark), Abou Simbel (Egypt), Azores (Portugal), Agadir (Morocco), Al'Aqaba (Jordan), Alexandria (Egypt), Athens (Greece), Berlin (Germany), Catania (Italy), Ciampino (Italy), Cork (Ireland), Djerba (Tunisia), Egilsstadir (Iceland), Gavle (Sweden), Glasgow (UK), Golbasi (Turkey), Gran Canaria (Spain), Haifa (Israel), Hartebeeshoek (South Africa), Jan Mayen (Norway), Kiev (Ukraine), Kirkenes (Norway), Kourou (France), Kuusamo (Finland), Lappeenranta (Finland), La Palma (Spain), Lisbon (Portugal), Madeira (Portugal), Malaga (Spain), Moncton (Canada), Nouakchott (Mauritania), Oran (Algeria), Palma de Mallorca (Spain), Paris (France), Reykjavik (Iceland), Santiago de Compostela (Spain), Sofia (Bulgaria), Svalbard (Norway), Swanwick (UK), Toulouse (France), Tromsø (Norway), Trondheim (Norway), Warsaw (Poland), Zurich (Switzerland)

Navigation land earth stations (NLES)

Aussaguel (France), Betzdorf (Luxembourg), Burum (Netherlands), Cagliari (Italy), Fucino (Italy), Rambouillet (France), Redu (Belgium)

Service centre

Torrejon (Spain)

---