alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001006591
<NAME> WHITE PINE SOFTWARE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-04-1997
<CASH>                                      18,006,062
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,699,196
<ALLOWANCES>                                   204,930
<INVENTORY>                                    129,413
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,644,249
<PP&E>                                       3,417,503
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,090,260
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,205,080
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,501,972
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        91,115
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,205,080
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,225,130
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,020,211
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,546,688
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                45,786
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,515
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,829,404)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,829,404)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.53)
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 8, 2020

s0505 

# Order

Clerk May 8, 2020

160638

DEPARTMENT OF TALENT & ECONOMIC

DEVELOPMENT/UNEMPLOYMENT

INSURANCE AGENCY,

Appellee,

v SC: 160638

COA: 343846

Oakland CC: 2017

- 162608

- AE

GREAT OAKS COUNTRY CLUB, INC.,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 12, 2019

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral

argument on the application. MCR 7.305(H)(1).

The appellant shall file a supplemental brief within 42 days of the date of this

order addressing whether the Court of Appeals correctly determined that it could not

satisfy MCL 421.13m(2)(a)( i )(A) by reporting no employees or no payroll for the eight

quarters before January 1, 2014. In addition to the brief, the appe llant shall electronically

file an appendix conforming to MCR 7.312(D)(2). In the brief, citations to the record

must provide the appendix page numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). The appellee

shall file a supplemental brief within 21 days of being s erved with the appellant’s brief.

The appellee shall also electronically file an appendix, or in the alternative, stipulate to

the use of the appendix filed by the appellant. A reply, if any, must be filed by the

appellant within 14 days of being served with the appellee’s brief. The parties should not

submit mere restatements of their application papers.

The Labor Law and Business Law Sections of the State Bar of Michigan, the

Michigan Chamber of Commerce, the Employers Association of West Michigan, and the

Small Business Association of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other

persons or groups interested in the determination of the issue presented in this case may

move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Celerity  Systems,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  June 30,  2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  each of
the  undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and results of operation
            of the Company.

Date:    August 18, 2004                    By: /s/ Robert Legnosky
                                                -------------------
                                                Robert Legnosky
                                                President and
                                                Interim Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to Celerity Systems,  Inc.
and will be retained by Celerity  Systems,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       20
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 290

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the major broadcast television networks should revive their traditional ‘‘Family Hour’’ and voluntarily

reserve the first hour of prime time broadcasting for family-oriented

programming.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 12, 1996

Mr. LIEBERMAN (for himself, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. NUNN, Mr. DEWINE,

Mr. COATS, Mr. FAIRCLOTH, Mr. BYRD, Mrs. KASSEBAUM, Mr. DORGAN,

Mr. CONRAD, and Mr. HATCH) submitted the following resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the major broadcast

television networks should revive their traditional ‘‘Family Hour’’ and voluntarily reserve the first hour of prime

time broadcasting for family-oriented programming.

Whereas the major broadcast television networks once adhered to a voluntary, self-enforced practice of setting

aside the first hour of prime time for programming suitable for audiences of all ages, especially young children;

Whereas the major networks have recently abandoned this

practice and chosen to fill this hour with programs laden

with sexually suggestive language and behavior and mature themes;
2

•SRES 290 IS

Whereas, according to the most recent Nielsen ratings, approximately 9,000,000 children between the ages of 2

and 11 watch television during an average minute between 8:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m. e.s.t;

Whereas the clear majority of American parents are concerned about the negative influence of television on

younger viewers, who watch on average 21 hours of television a week;

Whereas that concern was recently demonstrated again in a

poll conducted by U.S. News & World Report which

found that 76 percent of Americans believe that television

contributes to the problem of teenage pregnancy, 83 percent believe that television contributes to casual sex, 90

percent believe that television contributes to teenagers

having sex too soon, and 92 percent believe that television contributes to violence on our streets;

Whereas the Senate is comprised of elected representatives

who have a responsibility to give voice to the concerns of

their constituents; and

Whereas the Senate expresses public sentiment in this resolution, and does not attempt to establish by law or otherwise mandate or dictate any requirements regarding the

content of television programming: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the

2 major broadcast television networks should renew their

3 commitment to voluntarily reserving the first hour of

4 prime time for programming suitable for members of

5 American families of all ages.

Æ
**Exhibit 32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
 **18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In connection with the Amendment to the Quarterly Report of Biometrics 2000 Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the nine month period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph J. Turek, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Joseph J. Turek
 Joseph J. Turek
 Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
 (Principal Executive Officer)
 November 19, 2004
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 2046

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ALLEGHANY COUNTY , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DONNIE T. KERN , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke

. Thomas T. Cullen , District Judge. ( 7:21

- cv - 00471

- TTC )

Submitted : January 20, 2022 Decided: January 24, 2022

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Donnie T. Kern, Appellant Pro Se. Travis Stuart Andrews, Jim H. Guynn, Jr. , GUYNN WADDELL CARROLL & LOCKABY, P.C. , Salem, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM : Donnie T. Kern seeks to appeal the district court’s order remanding the case to the state court from which it was removed. The district court remanded the case because it lacked subject matter jurisdiction. Generally , a n order remanding a case to the state court from which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d); see 28 U.S.C. § 1442 ( exception for cases involving “[f]ederal officers or agencies sued or prosecuted”); 28 U.S.C. § 1443 ( exceptio n for cases involving “[c]ivil rights cases”)

. The Supreme Court has instructed that “§ 1447(d) must be read in pari materia with [28 U.S.C.] § 1447(c), so that only remands based on grounds specified in § 1447(c) are immune from review under § 1447(d).” Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca , 516 U.S. 124, 127 (1995);

see Doe v. Blair , 819 F.3d 64, 66

- 67 (4th Cir. 2016) (“ [A] di strict court may remand a case sua sponte for lack of subject matter jurisdiction at any time , and such an order is not reviewable

. ”) (citations omitted)). The district court remanded the case because it lacked subject matter jurisdiction. We, therefore, are without jurisdiction to review the remand order. See Doe , 819 F.3d at
66. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Kern’s motion to accelerate case processing, to schedule oral argument, and for injunctive or other relief

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Annual Report of Barclay Road, Inc., a Wyoming corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Eduardo Valero Erana, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Eduardo Valero EranaEduardo Valero Erana, Chief Executive Officer

July 6, 2011
Exhibit 10.18 - Asset Purchase Agreement between us and J&S Overseas Holdings


               AGREEMENT TO SELL URL (Universal Resource Locator)


        Agreement made this 10th day of July, 1999 by and between J&S Overseas
Holdings, of Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands (hereinafter referred to as "Seller")
and Power Direct, Inc. of Delaware, USA (hereinafter referred to as the
"Buyer").

        Whereas the Seller desires to sell and the buyer desires to buy the
three (3) assets known as the URL (Universal Resource Locator) registered as
"SuperStakes.com", "SuperCardStakes.com" and "ChinaStakes.net", the parties
hereto agree and covenant as follows:

        The total purchase price for the URL is two hundred thousand
(US$200,000.00) dollars in US currency and seven hundred fifty thousand
(750,000) shares of Power Direct, Inc.'s restricted (rule 144) common stock.

        The shares are to be delivered at the time of the passing ownership
papers of the URL's to the Buyer by the Seller.

        The property to be sold hereunder shall be conveyed by a standard Bill
of Sale, duly executed by the Seller.

        The Seller promises and agrees to convey good, clear, and marketable
title to all the property to be sold hereunder, the same to be free and clear of
all liens and encumbrances.

        Consummation of the sale, with payment by the Buyer of total purchase
price and the delivery by the Seller of a Bill of Sale, will take place on or
before November 10th, 1999.

        All of the terms, representations and warranties shall survive the
closing. This Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the Seller and
Buyer and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and
assigns.

        If this Agreement shall contain any term or provision which shall be
invalid or against public policy or if the application of same is invalid or
against public policy, then, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be
affected thereby and shall remain in full force and effect.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this instrument to be
executed in duplicate on July 10th, 1999.


/s/ Kevin Gunther                          /s/ Jack Sha
___________________________________        ______________________________
    SELLER                                     BUYER
    Brott Limited                              Jack Sha
    for J&S Overseas Holdings                  President
                                               Power Direct, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LORAL SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS LTD. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         318,903
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  376,482
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     99,020
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               133,740
<PP&E>                                         919,303
<DEPRECIATION>                                 146,862
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,683,226
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          387,865
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    731,289
<COMMON>                                         2,004
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,205,912
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,683,226
<SALES>                                        631,501
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               647,265
<CGS>                                          624,669
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  624,669
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,596
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,975
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,702)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,649)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul Alonzo EWING, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-7243

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 18, 2018

Decided: January 26, 2018

*238Paul Alonzo Ewing, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Dee Griffith, Jr., Newport News, Virginia, Melissa Elaine O’Boyle, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Paul Alonzo Ewing seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his “Complaint for Release from Plea Agreement” as an unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and denying it for lack of jurisdiction. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 164 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ewing has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 22

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require

a balanced budget.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 19 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 1995

Mr. GRAMS (for himself, Mr. LOTT, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. THOMAS, and Mr.

MACK) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice

and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to require a balanced budget.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the follow4 ing article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitu5 tion, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as

6 part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures

7 of three-fourths of the several States within seven years

8 after the date of its submission to the States for ratifica9 tion:
2

•SJ 22 IS

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Total outlays for any fiscal year shall

3 not exceed total receipts for that fiscal year, unless three4 fifths of the whole number of each House of Congress shall

5 provide by law for a specific excess of outlays over receipts

6 by a rollcall vote.

7 ‘‘SECTION 2. The limit on the debt of the United

8 States held by the public shall not be increased, unless

9 three-fifths of the whole number of each House shall pro10 vide by law for such an increase by a rollcall vote.

11 ‘‘SECTION 3. Prior to each fiscal year, the President

12 shall transmit to the Congress a proposed budget for the

13 United States Government for that fiscal year, in which

14 total outlays do not exceed total receipts.

15 ‘‘SECTION 4. No bill to increase revenues shall be16 come law unless approved by a three-fifths majority by

17 rollcall vote of the whole number of each House of

18 Congress.

19 ‘‘SECTION 5. The Congress may waive the provisions

20 of this article for any fiscal year in which a declaration

21 of war is in effect. The provisions of this article may be

22 waived for any fiscal year in which the United States is

23 engaged in military conflict which causes an imminent and

24 serious military threat to national security and is so de-
3

•SJ 22 IS

1 clared by a joint resolution, adopted by a majority of the

2 whole number of each House, which becomes law.

3 ‘‘SECTION 6. The Congress shall enforce and imple4 ment this article by appropriate legislation, which may rely

5 on estimates of outlays and receipts.

6 ‘‘SECTION 7. Total receipts shall include all receipts

7 of the United States Government except those derived

8 from borrowing. Total outlays shall include all outlays of

9 the United States Government except for those for repay10 ment of debt principal.

11 ‘‘SECTION 8. This article shall take effect beginning

12 with fiscal year 2002 or with the second fiscal year begin13 ning after its ratification, whichever is later.’’.

Æ