alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

Exhibit 11.0  Statement re: Computation of Per Share Earnings (Unaudited)

  Earnings per share were computed as follows (dollar amounts in thousands
except share data):



                                                   Weighted
                                                   Average   Per Share
                                                    Income    Shares    Amount
                                                   --------  ---------  ------

For the three month ended March 31, 2001:
-----------------------------------------
Basic Earnings per Share:
    Income available to common stockholders         $   566  1,492,790   $0.38
Effect of Dilutive Securities:
    Stock options                                               13,730
    Unearned incentive plan shares                              16,467
                                                             ---------
Diluted Earnings per Share:
    Income available to common stockholders and
assumed conversions                                 $   566  1,522,987   $0.37
                                                    =======  =========   =====


For the three months ended March 31, 2000:
------------------------------------------
Basic Earnings per Share:
    Income available to common stockholders         $   509  1,852,777   $0.27
Effect of Dilutive Securities:
    Stock options                                               45,862
    Unearned incentive plan shares                              34,589
                                                             ---------
Diluted Earnings per Share:
    Income available to common stockholders and
assumed conversions                                 $   509  1,933,228   $0.26
                                                    =======  =========   =====

                                       16
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 

87 FR 14306, March 14, 2022.

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: 

Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 2 p.m.

# CHANGES IN THE MEETING: 

The Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 2:00 p.m., has been cancelled.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For further information; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.)

Dated: March 16, 2022.

Vanessa A. Countryman,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-05960 Filed 3-17-22; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 212 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 212

 To constitute the minority party's membership on the Ethics Committee 
     for the 104th Congress, or until their successors are chosen.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 23, 1996

 Mr. Daschle submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To constitute the minority party's membership on the Ethics Committee 
     for the 104th Congress, or until their successors are chosen.

    Resolved, That the following shall constitute the minority party's 
membership on the Ethics Committee for the 104th Congress, or until 
their successors are chosen: The Senator from North Dakota (Mr. 
Dorgan), Vice Chairman, the Senator from Nevada (Mr. Reid), and the 
Senator from Washington (Mrs. Murray).
                                 <all>
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

TOMAS LORENTZ , Appellant,

v.

MATTHEW KRAC and CHRISTINA KRAC DIMMOCK

, Appellee s

.

No. 4D2023

- 0817

[ December 7, 2023 ]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Terri

- Ann Miller, Judge; L.T. Case No

. COSO21

- 008881

.
Tomas Lorentz, Davie, pro se.

Joshua Christensen, Lampariello Law Group, LLP, Royal Palm Beach, for appellee s

.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

M AY , D AMOORGIAN and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 168

[Report No. 104–137]

Concerning the Select Committee on Ethics Investigation of Senator

Packwood of Oregon.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 8 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 5), 1995

Mr. MCCONNELL, from the Select Committee on Ethics, reported the following

original resolution; which was placed on the calendar

NOVEMBER 1, 1996

Indefinitely postponed

RESOLUTION

Concerning the Select Committee on Ethics Investigation

of Senator Packwood of Oregon.

1 Resolved, That pursuant to article 1, section 5, clause

2 2 of the United States Constitution, Senator Packwood

3 is expelled from the Senate for his illegal actions and im4 proper conduct in attempting to obstruct and impede the

5 Committee’s inquiry; engaging in a pattern of sexual mis6 conduct in at least 18 instances between 1969 and 1990;

7 and engaging in a plan to enhance his financial position

8 by soliciting, encouraging and coordinating employment
2

SRES 168 IPS

1 opportunities for his wife from individuals with interests

2 in legislation or issues which he could influence.

Æ
EX-35 (g)
(logo) WELLS FARGO


Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax


Wells Fargo Bank, N A.


March 13, 2007


Renaissance Mortgage Acceptance Corp.

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for Renaissance Home Equity Loan Trust
2006-4


Per Section 3.09 of the Servicing Agreement, dated as of 12/28/2006, the
undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Securities Administrator),
hereby certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:


(i)     a review of the activities of such party during the preceding calendar
        year or portion thereof and of such party's performance under this
        Agreement or such other applicable agreement in the case of a Servicing
        Function Participant has been made under such officers' supervision and


(ii)    to the best of such officers' knowledge, based on such review, such
        party has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement or such
        other applicable agreement in the case of a Servicing Function
        Participant in all material respects throughout such calendar year, or,
        if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any
        material respect, specifying each such failure known to such officer and
        the nature and status of cure provisions thereof.


Certified By:
/s/Reid Denny
Reid Denny, Vice President

Certified By:
/s/Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 311

Designating the month of November 1996 as ‘‘National American Indian

Heritage Month’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 3, 1996

Mr. MCCAIN (for himself, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. BENNETT, Mr.

BINGAMAN, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. BRADLEY, Mr. BREAUX, Mr. BROWN, Mr.

BRYAN, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. COHEN, Mr. CONRAD, Mr.

CRAIG, Mr. D’AMATO, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. DODD, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr.

DORGAN, Mr. EXON, Mr. FAIRCLOTH, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mrs. FEINSTEIN,

Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. HATCH, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. JEFFORDS,

Mrs. KASSEBAUM, Mr. KEMPTHORNE, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. LAUTENBERG,

Mr. LEVIN, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. LOTT, Ms. MIKULSKI, Ms. MOSELEYBRAUN, Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. NICKLES, Mr. PELL, Mr.

PRESSLER, Mr. REID, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. SIMON, Mr. SPECTER,

Mr. STEVENS, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. THURMOND, Mr. WARNER, and Mr.

WELLSTONE) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Designating the month of November 1996 as ‘‘National

American Indian Heritage Month’’.

Whereas American Indians and Alaska Natives were the

original inhabitants of the land that now constitutes the

United States;

Whereas American Indian tribal governments developed the

fundamental principles of freedom of speech and separa-
2

•SRES 311 IS

tion of powers that form the foundation of the United

States Government;

Whereas American Indians and Alaska Natives have traditionally exhibited a respect for the finiteness of natural

resources through a reverence for the earth;

Whereas American Indians and Alaska Natives have served

with valor in all of America’s wars beginning with the

Revolutionary War through the conflict in the Persian

Gulf, and often the percentage of American Indians who

served exceeded significantly the percentage of American

Indians in the population of the United States as a

whole;

Whereas American Indians and Alaska Natives have made

distinct and important contributions to the United States

and the rest of the world in many fields, including agriculture, medicine, music, language, and art;

Whereas American Indians and Alaska Natives deserve to be

recognized for their individual contributions to the United

States as local and national leaders, artists, athletes, and

scholars;

Whereas this recognition will encourage self-esteem, pride,

and self-awareness in American Indians and Alaska Natives of all ages; and

Whereas November is a time when many Americans commemorate a special time in the history of the United

States when American Indians and English settlers celebrated the bounty of their harvest and the promise of

new kinships: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates November 1996

2 as ‘‘National American Indian Heritage Month’’ and re-
3

•SRES 311 IS

1 quests that the President issue a proclamation calling on

2 the Federal Government and State and local governments,

3 interested groups and organizations, and the people of the

4 United States to observe the month with appropriate pro5 grams, ceremonies, and activities.

Æ
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodrick Lamont NICHOLSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6891

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 22, 2017

Decided: January 19, 2018

Rodrick Lamont Nicholson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Albert Jamison Lang, Assistant United States Attorney, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rodrick Lamont Nicholson seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion.* The order is not *187appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability mil not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right.' *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Nicholson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Nicholson’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*

*

 We have reviewed Nicholson’s informal brief raising ineffective assistance claims related to *187his status as a career offender under *United States v. Davis,*720 F.3d 215, 219 (4th Cir. 2013).
# Official Journal C 350/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.350.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 350 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5322 December 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.350.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 350

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5322 December 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions |
| | RESOLUTIONS |
| | Committee of the Regions |
| | 84th plenary session held on 14 and 15 April 2010 |
| 2010/C 350/01 | Resolution of the Committee of the Regions on the Priorities of the Committee of the Regions for 2010 based on the Legislative and Work Programme of the European Commission | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions

RESOLUTIONS

Committee of the Regions

84th plenary session held on 14 and 15 April 2010

2010/C 350/01

Resolution of the Committee of the Regions on the Priorities of the Committee of the Regions for 2010 based on the Legislative and Work Programme of the European Commission

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Lateshia PATILLO Plaintiff-Appellant v. SYSCO FOODS OF ARKANSAS LLC Defendant-Appellee Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Amicus on Behalf of Appellant

No. 17-1110

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: November 16, 2017

Filed: December 6, 2017

Lateshia Patillo, Pro Se

Dennis P. Duffy, Baker & Hostetler, Houston, TX, John T. Holleman, Holleman & Associates, P.A., Little Rock, AR, for Defendant-Appellee

Jeremy D. Horowitz, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Office of General Counsel, Washington, DC, for Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Amicus on Behalf of Appellant(s)

Before SHEPHERD, MURPHY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Lateshia Patillo appeals the district court’s order dismissing her employment-discrimination action, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Upon de novo review, see Blakley v. Schlumberger Tech. Corp., 648 F.3d 921, 931 (8th Cir. 2011), we vacate the dismissal order and remand the case to the district court. The court is instructed to reconsider the issues in this case, including whether an intake questionnaire Patillo filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission constituted a valid administrative charge of discrimi*613nation, in light of Supreme Court precedent including Fed. Express Corp. v. Holowecki, 552 U.S. 389, 128 S.Ct. 1147, 170 L.Ed.2d 10 (2008), and Edelman v. Lynchburg Coll., 535 U.S. 106, 122 S.Ct. 1145, 152 L.Ed.2d 188 (2002).
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JASPER WASHINGTON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-2537

[April 5, 2023]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Mariya Weeks, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 19-009772CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Paul Petillo, Assistant Public 

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Paul Patti, III, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Supreme Court quashed our decision in Washington v. 

State, 293 So. 3d 1060 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020), and remanded for 

reconsideration in light of Morgan v. State, 350 So. 3d 712 (Fla. 2022). 

State v. Washington, SC20-671, 2023 WL 2340306 (Fla. Mar. 3, 2023).

Based on Morgan, we affirm the circuit court’s May 7, 2019, order 

rescinding the circuit court’s November 18, 2016, order granting the 

defendant’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence. 

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., GERBER and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *
2

No motions for rehearing shall be permitted.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6421 SHAWN HUNTER, a/k/a Elijah Rybinni, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus G. L. BASS, Warden; UNKNOWN CHAPLIN, Captain; SERGEANT HARRISON; JOHN DOE, Correctional Officer #1; JOHN DOE, Correctional Officer #2, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-94-871) Submitted: December 12, 1996 Decided: December 18, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Shawn Hunter, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Jill Theresa Bowers, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's judgment, pursuant to a jury verdict, that he recover nothing in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) action. The record does not contain a transcript of thetrial. Appellant has the burden of including in the record on appeal a transcript of all parts of the proceedings material to the issues raised on appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2); 4th Cir. Local R. 10(c). Appellants proceeding on appeal in forma pauperis are entitled to transcripts at gov ernment expense only in certain circumstances. 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (1994). By failing to produce a transcript or to qualify for the production of a transcript at government expense, Appellant has waived review of the issues on appeal which depend upon the transcript to show error. Powell v. Estelle , 959 F.2d 22, 26 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 506 U.S. 1025 (1992); Keller v. Prince George's Co. , 827 F.2d 952, 954 n.1 (4th Cir. 1987). We have reviewed the record before the court and find no reversible error. We therefore affirm the district court's order entering judgment for the Appellees. We deny Appellant's motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                          9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                           JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1,885
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         1,828
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   12,576
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         4,419
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           4,505
<LOANS>                                       97,093
<ALLOWANCE>                                      299
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               121,253
<DEPOSITS>                                    73,091
<SHORT-TERM>                                       0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              571
<LONG-TERM>                                   31,545
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                    16,046
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               121,253
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                3,305
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                568
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  71
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               3,944
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             1,528
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,217
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          1,727
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     31
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                1,161
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  611
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       407
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                     407
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .30
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  3.06
<LOANS-NON>                                      197
<LOANS-PAST>                                       0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 269
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      0
<RECOVERIES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                299
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          299



</TABLE>
### MEMORANDUM 

### SUBJECT: Po sting EPA -HQ- OAR-201 4- 05 7 to Regul ations.gov for Public Access 

### FROM: Chris Franz



# ~ EPA Office o rA i; and Radiation 

### Thru:
This memorandum authorizes the posting ofEPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0557 to Regulations.gov for public access. EPA developed five oil and gas white papers and posted those papers on April 15, 2014 on the EPA oil and gas website (http://www.epa.gov/airquality/oilandgas/whitepapers.html). The public submitted technical information and data to an email box, OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov, in response to those papers between April15, 2014 and June 16, 2014. This docket contain those submittals without any change. Should you have any questions regarding this memorandum, please contact Eric Shultz at (202) 566-1883, or via email at schultz.eric@epa.gov.