alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 66

To prevent the adoption of certain national history standards.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 20 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 1995

Mr. GORTON (for himself, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. GRAMM, and Mr. BYRD)

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To prevent the adoption of certain national history

standards.

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that (a)

2 The National Education Goals Panel should disapprove,

3 and the National Education Standards and Improvement

4 Council should not certify, any voluntary national content

5 standards, voluntary national student performance stand6 ards, or criteria for the certification of such content and

7 student performance standards, on the subject of world

8 and United States history, developed prior to February 1,

9 1995.

10 (b) Voluntary national content standards, voluntary

11 national student performance standards, and criteria for
2

SRES 66 ATS

1 the certification of such content and student performance

2 standards, on the subject of world and United States his3 tory, established under title II of the Goals 2000: Educate

4 America Act should not be based on standards developed

5 primarily by the National Center for History in the

6 Schools prior to February 1, 1995; and

7 (c) If the Department of Education, the National En8 dowment for the Humanities, or any other Federal agency

9 provides funds for the development of the standards and

10 criteria described in paragraph (d), the recipient of such

11 funds should have a decent respect for the contributions

12 of western civilization, and United States history, ideas,

13 and institutions, to the increase of freedom and prosperity

14 around the world.

Æ
----

| (1)    | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                |

| Date: July 31, 2009 | /s/ Patrick J. Goodman                            |   |
|---------------------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                | Patrick J. Goodman                                |   |
|                | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                | (principal financial officer)                     |   |

----
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Gabriel Louis Mendoza, Appellant

No. 06

- 13

- 00153

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 283rd District Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. F12

- 55612

- T ). Memorandum Opinion delive red by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment to reflect that appellant pled not guilty to the offense of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon

. As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. We note that the appellant, Gabriel Louis Mendoza, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 23, 2014 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 147 5

RONALD SATISH EMRIT , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, (DMV); MARYLAND MOTOR VEHICLE ADMINISTRATION, (MVA); U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. George J

. Hazel , District Judge. ( 8:17

- cv
- 00064

- GJH )

Submitted : June 20, 2017 Decided: June 30, 2017

Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Ronald Satish Emrit, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Ronald Satish Emrit appeals the district co urt’s order dismissing his civil complaint for failure to state a claim and improper venue

. * We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. See Buchanan v. Manley , 145 F.3d 386, 3 88

- 89 (D.C. Cir. 1998) . It is apparent from Emrit’s complaint that no conceivable basis exists for venue in the District of Maryland. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) , (c) (2012) (describing venue and residency requirements); O’Neill v. Battisti , 472 F.2d 789, 791 (6th Cir. 1972) (des cribing “residency” of public official). Moreover, we are satisfied that the interests of justice did not require transferring, rather than dismissing, the action. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal , 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (recognizing that, to survive dismissal, “ a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face” (int ernal quotation marks omitted)); Simpkins v. D.C. Gov’ t , 108 F.3d 366, 370 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (recognizing that district court may dismiss action, despite improper venue, where complaint patently failed to state viable claim).

* Although Emrit’s notice of appeal was filed more than 6 0 days after the district court’s dismissal order, his appeal is timely because the court’s order explains in full its reasons for dismissing the complaint and therefore is not a separate judgment und er Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a). See Hughes v. Halifax C n ty. Sch. Bd. , 823 F.2d 832, 835 (4th Cir. 1987). The order is deemed “entered,” for purposes of Fed. R. App. P. 4(a), when “150 days have run from entry of the order in the civil doc ket.” Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(7)(A )(ii). As Emrit’s notice of appeal was filed within that 150

- day period, we have jurisdiction to consider his appeal

. See Quinn v. Haynes , 234 F.3d 837, 843 (4th Cir. 2000).3 Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). A R / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T REN E TO RRES FLO RES; ELSA G U I L L E R M I N A T O R R E S ; e t a l., P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 73506 A ge nc yN os . A 095- 309- 347

A 095- 309- 348 A 095- 309- 349 A 095- 309- 350 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d J anua ry11, 2010 ** B efo re: B E E Z E R , T R O T T , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R e ne T orr e s F l or e s , hi s w i f e , E l s aG ui l l e rm i naT orr e s , a nd the i rtw o m i nor c hi l dr e n, na t i ve s a nd c i t i z e ns of M e xi c o, pe t i t i on pr o s e f orr e vi e w of

a n or de rof the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s ( “ B IA ”) denyi ng thei r m ot i on t o reopen 

# FI LED JAN 22 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSA R/ Res ea r ch 07- 73506 2 r e m ova l pr oc e e di ngs . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f or ab u s e o f d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n , O rdo n ezv . I NS , 345 F . 3d 777, 7 8 2 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 3 ) , a n dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n b yd e n y in g T o rr e s F lo r e s ’ m o tio n to r e o p e n b e c au s e th e B I A c o n s id e r e dth e e v id e n c e h e s ub m itte da n da c te dw ith in its br oa d di s c r e t i on i n de t e rm i ni ng tha tthe e vi de nc e w a s i ns uf f i c i e ntt o w arr ant r e o p e n in g . Se e S i n gh v . I NS , 2 9 5 F .3 d1 0 3 7 , 1 0 3 9 (9 th C ir. 2 0 0 2 ) ( th e B IA ’s de ni a l of am ot i on t o r e ope n s ha l l be r e ve r s e d i f i ti s “ arbi tr ary , i rr a t i ona l , or contraryt o l aw . ”) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 190 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 190

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for the congressional 
                         Christmas celebration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 8, 1997

 Mr. Christensen submitted the following concurrent resolution; which 
            was referred to the Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for the congressional 
                         Christmas celebration.

Whereas celebrating Christmas is a tradition in this Nation, dating from before 
        the Nation's founding and commemorated each year by a national holiday; 
        and
Whereas the congressional Christmas event celebrates America's rich and diverse 
        heritage of honoring the Christmas spirit of unity, service, and 
        reconciliation through the Nation's history: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF THE CAPITOL ROTUNDA FOR THE CONGRESSIONAL CHRISTMAS 
              CELEBRATION.

    (a) In General.--The American Compass (hereafter in this resolution 
referred to as the ``sponsor'') shall be permitted to sponsor a 
Christmas celebration (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the 
``event'') in the rotunda of the Capitol on Monday, December 8, 1997 
(plus the 2 days before for setup and rehearsal).
    (b) Terms and Conditions.--The event shall be open to all Members 
and their families, free of admission charge, and arranged so as not to 
interfere with the needs of Congress, under conditions to be prescribed 
by the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board. The 
sponsor shall assume full responsibility for all expenses and 
liabilities incident to all activities associated with the event.
    (c) Structures and Equipment.--For the purposes of the event, the 
sponsor is authorized to erect in the rotunda of the Capitol such 
stage, sound devices, lighting devices, and related structures and 
equipment as may be required to conduct the event, subject to the 
approval of the Architect of the Capitol.
    (d) Additional Arrangements.--The Architect of the Capitol and the 
Capitol Police Board are authorized to make any such additional 
arrangements as may be necessary to carry out the event consistent with 
good order and protection of the Capitol and the Capitol grounds.

SEC. 2. SPONSORSHIP OR ENDORSEMENT.

    Nothing contained in this resolution shall constitute approval or 
endorsement of the sponsor. This resolution does not in any way 
constitute approval or endorsement by the United States Government, or 
any of its agencies, of any activity or expression, religious or 
otherwise, of the sponsor.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)


The undersigned, Sterling H. McDonald, Chief Financial Officer of Natural Gas
Systems, Inc. (the "Company"), certifies in connection with the filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report")") pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley
Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:


1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
and for the periods covered in the Report.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
___day of February 2005.


/s/ Sterling H. McDonald
---------------------------
Sterling H. McDonald
Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 87 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 87

  Authorizing the taking of a photograph in the Chamber of the United 
                             States Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 10 (legislative day, March 6), 1995

 Mr. Dole submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Authorizing the taking of a photograph in the Chamber of the United 
                             States Senate.

    Resolved, That paragraph 1 of Rule IV of the Rules for the 
Regulation of the Senate Wing of the United States Capitol (prohibiting 
the taking of pictures in the Senate Chamber) be temporarily suspended 
for the sole and specific purpose of permitting the National Geographic 
Society to photograph the United States Senate in actual session on a 
date and time to be announced by the majority leader, after 
consultation with the minority leader.
    Sec. 2. The Sergeant at Arms of the Senate is authorized and 
directed to make the necessary arrangements therefor, which 
arrangements shall provide for a minimum of disruption to Senate 
proceedings.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                       LORAL SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS LTD.

          COMPUTATION OF DEFICIENCY OF EARNINGS TO COVER FIXED CHARGES
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)
                                  (UNAUDITED)

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                  SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                              ---------------------
                                                                2002        2001
                                                              ---------   ---------
<S>                                                           <C>         <C>
Loss before income taxes, equity in net losses of
  affiliates, minority interest and cumulative effect of
  change in accounting principle............................  $ (21,661)  $(117,071)
Plus fixed charges:
  Interest expense..........................................     81,763     158,058
  Interest component of rent expense(1).....................     11,452      13,285
Less: capitalized interest..................................     25,298      16,938
                                                              ---------   ---------
Earnings available to cover fixed charges...................  $  46,256   $  37,334
                                                              =========   =========
Fixed charges(2)............................................  $(160,595)  $(240,123)
                                                              =========   =========
Deficiency of earnings to cover fixed charges...............  $(114,339)  $(202,789)
                                                              =========   =========
</Table>

---------------

(1) The interest component of rent expense is deemed to be approximately 25% of
    total rent expense.

(2) Preferred dividends have not been adjusted for income taxes, due to the
    composition of the taxing jurisdictions underlying the Company's operations
    and the resulting impact on the Company's effective tax rate.
#### Antonio Montrell SNOW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WILSON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; Wilson County Sheriffs Department, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-7624

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 15, 2018

Decided: February 20, 2018

Antonio Montrell Snow, Appellant Pro . Se.

Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Antonio Montrell Snow appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012). The magistrate judge recommended that Snow’s complaint be dismissed without prejudice and advised Snow that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. The district court adopted the conclusions of the magistrate judge and dismissed Snow’s complaint with prejudice.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. *Wright v. Collins,*766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); *see also Thomas v. Arn,*474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). Snow has waived appellate review of the issues by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. However, because Snow was not given an opportunity to respond to the dismissal of the complaint *265with prejudice, we affirm the judgment as modified to reflect a dismissal without prejudice. *See Thomas v. Salvation Army S. Terr.,*841 F.3d 632, 642 (4th Cir. 2016); *King v. Rubenstein,*825 F.3d 206, 225 (4th Cir. 2016).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED*
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 83 Referral Instructions Senate (RIS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 83

To express the sense of the Senate regarding tax cuts during the 104th 
                               Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

              March 2 (legislative day, February 22), 1995

  Mr. Feingold (for himself and Mr. Bumpers) submitted the following 
resolution; which was referred jointly pursuant to the order of August 
4, 1977, to the Committees on the Budget and Governmental Affairs, with 
 instructions that if one committee reports, the other committee have 
                 thirty days to report or be discharged

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To express the sense of the Senate regarding tax cuts during the 104th 
                               Congress.

Whereas the Federal budget according to the most recent estimates of the 
        Congressional Budget Office continues to be in deficit in excess of $190 
        billion;
Whereas continuing annual Federal budget deficits add to the Federal debt which 
        soon is projected to exceed $5 trillion;
Whereas continuing Federal budget deficits and growing Federal debt reduce 
        savings and capital formation;
Whereas continuing Federal budget deficits contribute to a higher level of 
        interest rates than would otherwise occur, raising capital costs and 
        curtailing total investment;
Whereas continuing Federal budget deficits also contribute to significant trade 
        deficits and dependence on foreign capital;
Whereas the Federal debt that results from persistent Federal deficits transfers 
        a potentially crushing burden to future generations, making their living 
        standards lower than they otherwise would have been;
Whereas efforts to reduce the Federal deficit should be among the highest 
        economic priorities of the 104th Congress; and
Whereas enacting across-the-board or so-called middle class tax cut measures 
        could impede efforts during the 104th Congress to significantly reduce 
        the Federal deficit: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that reducing the 
Federal deficit should be one of the Nation's highest priorities, that 
enacting an across-the-board or so-called middle class tax cut during 
the 104th Congress would hinder efforts to significantly reduce the 
Federal deficit.
                                 <all>
```