alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                -----------------

                                    FORM 10-Q/A
                QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                                -----------------

         FOR THE QUARTER ENDED                  COMMISSION FILE NUMBER
              JUNE 30, 1996                            0-27826

                                -----------------

                             PARTY CITY CORPORATION
             (EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

              DELAWARE                                 22--3033692
  (State or other jurisdiction of                   (I.R.S. Employer
   incorporation or organization)                  Identification No.)

        400 COMMONS WAY                                   07866
      ROCKAWAY, NEW JERSEY                              (ZIP CODE)

                                  201-983-0888
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
                                -----------------


         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
                      Yes  X         No:  
                          ---            ---
         Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's
classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date:

         As of August 9, 1996, there were outstanding 6,944,000 shares of Common
Stock, $.01 par value.
<PAGE>   2



                                  SIGNATURE

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
Undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                                  PARTY CITY CORPORATION



                                  By        /s/ DAVID LAUBER
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                           (David Lauber)
                                           Duly Authorized Officer &
                                           Chief Financial &
                                           Principal Accounting Officer

Date:  March 6, 1996
October 22, 2013

AEMP Data: Atrazine, Flow, Precipitation and TSS Plots 

for 2013 Monitoring Year
2

2013 IA-04

IA042013_ATZ
3

2013 IA-05
4

2013 LA-04 
5

2013 MO-01
6

2013 MO-02
7

2013 MO-07N
8

2013 MO-08
9

2013 NE-04
10

2013 TX-01
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Document Number NASA-22-013; Docket Number-NASA-2022-0001]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

# ACTION:

Request for public comment on new term and condition that requires recipients of NASA financial assistance to obtain a quotation from small and/or minority businesses, women's business enterprises or labor surplus area firms; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of February 23, 2022, concerning a request for public comment on new term and condition that requires recipients of NASA financial assistance to obtain a quotation from small and/or minority businesses, women's business enterprises or labor surplus area firms. The document contained an incorrect date.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Christiane S. Diallo,                         *Christiane.diallo@nasa.gov,*                         (202) 358-5179.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

 

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of February 23, 2022, in [FR Doc. 2022-03602], on page 10257, in the third column, correct the “Dates” caption to read:                

**DATES:**                     Comments must be received by April 24, 2022.                

Nanette Smith,

Team Lead, NASA Directives and Regulations.

[FR Doc. 2022-05954 Filed 3-21-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
----

| (1)    | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                     |

| Date: November 5, 2010 | /s/ Patrick J. Goodman                            |   |
|------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                   | Patrick J. Goodman                                |   |
|                   | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                   | (principal financial officer)                     |   |

----
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 104

Referring S. 676 entitled ‘‘A bill for the relief of D.W. Jacobson, Ronald

Karkala, and Paul Bjorgen of Grand Rapids, Minnesota, and for other

purposes’’ to the chief judge of the United States Court of Federal

Claims for a report on bill.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 5, 1995

Mr. GRAMS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Referring S. 676 entitled ‘‘A bill for the relief of D.W.

Jacobson, Ronald Karkala, and Paul Bjorgen of Grand

Rapids, Minnesota, and for other purposes’’ to the chief

judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims

for a report on bill.

1 Resolved, That the bill S. 676 entitled ‘‘A bill for the

2 relief of D.W. Jacobson, Ronald Karkala, and Paul

3 Bjorgen of Grand Rapids, Minnesota, and for other pur4 poses’’ is referred, with all accompanying papers, to the

5 chief judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims
2

•SRES 104 IS

1 for a report in accordance with sections 1492 and 2509

2 of title 28, United States Code.

Æ
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 147

Designating the weeks beginning September 24, 1995, and September 22,

1996, as ‘‘National Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week’’,

and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 30 (legislative day, JUNE 19), 1995

Mr. THURMOND (for himself, Mr. JOHNSTON, Mr. PELL, Mrs. HUTCHISON,

Mr. D’AMATO, Mr. DODD, Mr. HOLLINGS, Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN, Mr.

SIMON, Mr. GORTON, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. LOTT, Mr. WARNER,

Mr. KOHL, Mr. ROBB, Mr. BROWN, Mr. COHEN, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr.

PRESSLER, and Mr. BRADLEY) submitted the following resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

SEPTEMBER 20 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 5), 1995

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating the weeks beginning September 24, 1995, and

September 22, 1996, as ‘‘National Historically Black

Colleges and Universities Week’’, and for other purposes.

Whereas there are 103 historically black colleges and universities in the United States;

Whereas black colleges and universities provide the quality

education so essential to full participation in a complex,

highly technological society;

Whereas black colleges and universities have a rich heritage

and have played a prominent role in American history;
2

SRES 147 ATS

Whereas black colleges and universities have allowed many

underprivileged students to attain their full potential

through higher education; and

Whereas the achievements and goals of historically black colleges and universities are deserving of national recognition: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates the weeks be2 ginning September 24, 1995, and September 22, 1996, as

3 ‘‘National Historically Black Colleges and Universities

4 Week’’. The Senate requests the President of the United

5 States to issue a proclamation calling on the people of the

6 United States and interested groups to observe the weeks

7 with appropriate ceremonies, activities, and programs to

8 demonstrate support for historically black colleges and

9 universities in the United States.

Æ
EXHIBIT 10.8


 





November __. 2015


 


Entera Bio Ltd. 


Kiryat Hadassah Minrav Building
- Fifth Floor

POB 12117

Jerusalem, Israel


 


Reference
is made to the Second Amendment to Series A Preferred Share Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2015 by and between the
Company and Centillion Fund (“Centillion” and the “Second
Amendment”, respectively). Any capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have such meaning provided
to them in the Second Amendment.


 


Following
discussions between Centillion and the Company, and notwithstanding the fact that this notice is provided following October 1,
2015, Centillion hereby requests to extend the last date for the consummation of the second Milestone Event to October 1, 2017.


 


This
letter shall be deemed an amendment pursuant to Section 10.4 of the Series A Preferred Share Purchase Agreement, dated as of January
29th, 2014 by and between the Company and Centillion (the “SPA”),
to the last date in which this letter can be submitted pursuant to Schedule 1.2(a) of the SPA (as was amended by the Second Amendment)
to be November __ 2015.


 


 


CENTILLION FUND


 


By:
/s/ Sean Ellis


 


Name: Sean
Ellis


 


Title: __________


 


 


Agreed
and accepted:


 


ENTERA BIO LTD.


 


By:
/s/ Phillip Schwartz


 


Name: Phillip
Schwartz


 


Title: _CEO_________
#### Moody v. Moody

*Ahmed T. Aziz,*for plaintiff.

*David G. Joyce,*for defendant.

December 16, 1986

STEEGE, *J.,*

—Donald L. Moody, plaintiff herein, initiated this divorce proceeding by filing his complaint on June 6, 1985. On July 3, 1985, in response to a request for counseling *114filed by Joan P. Moody defendant herein, this court ordered “that the parties to this divorce action are required to attend at least three counseling sessions before a qualified professional,” in accordance with section 202(b) of the Divorce Code, 23 P.S. § 202(b). Joan has now filed a petition alleging that Donald has failed to comply with the terms of the order of July 3, 1985; she requests that a rule be issued upon Donald to show cause why he should not be made to comply with the order and why all proceedings in the case should not be stayed until he does.

Section 202(b) directs the court to “require up to a maximum of three counseling sessions *within the 90 days following the filing of the complaint*where either of the parties requests it.” (emphasis added). While it is clear that Donald has resisted compliance with the counseling order (his unilateral counseling sessions with a social worker near his home in Warren, Ohio do not impress us), it is equally clear that no counseling sessions were arranged within the 90-day period set forth in the statute. .

Most clear of all is that requiring counseling now would be to no purpose. The legislative policy behind section 202(b) is to provide a mechanism to compel counseling within the first three months after the filing of the complaint- when, in some cases, reconciliation might be possible. That is not now the situation here.1

The petition is denied. The order of July 3, 1985, is vacated.

1

. We point out that section 202 provides no sanctions for the failure to attend counseling sessions directed by the court and arranged by the party seeking them. Section 202(f) provides, in full, that “[w].here the court requires counseling, a report shall be made by the qualified professional stating that the parties did or did not attend.”
June 10, 2015

Mr. Gregory Stark 10706 Indigo Sky Way South Jordan, UT 84095

Dear Mr. Stark:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your May 19, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015- 1723), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 151

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Unitbon dioxide in the atmosphere. ner that substantially reduces the amount of car- a world leader in managing its forests in a man- United States should serve as an example and as phere among many other objectives, and that the the reduction of carbon dioxide in the atmos- ed States should manage its forests to maximize
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 151

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas carbon dioxide, a major greenhouse gas, can be removed from the atmosphere by trees through photosynthesis and stored in wood;

Whereas releases of carbon dioxide can be prevented by the

use of wood products as substitutes for products whose

manufacture consumes fossil fuels and releases substantial amounts of carbon dioxide; and
2

•HCON 151 EH

Whereas managing our forests by planting and growing our

forest resources will remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 United States—

4 (1) should manage its forests to maximize the

5 reduction of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere

6 among many other objectives; and

7 (2) should serve as an example and as a world

8 leader in managing its forests in a manner that sub9 stantially reduces the amount of carbon dioxide in

10 the atmosphere.

Passed the House of Representatives October 21,

1997.

Attest:

Clerk.
No. D-2614.

#### In re Disbarment of Creel.

Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 565 U. S. 1053.]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 8, 2020 s0505

Order 

Clerk

May 8, 2020

160638

DEPARTMENT OF TALENT & ECONOMIC

DEVELOPMENT/UNEMPLOYMENT

INSURANCE AGENCY,

Appellee,

v SC: 160638

COA: 343846

Oakland CC: 2017-162608-AE

GREAT OAKS COUNTRY CLUB, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 12, 2019 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on the application. MCR 7.305(H)(1). 

The appellant shall file a supplemental brief within 42 days of the date of this 

order addressing whether the Court of Appeals correctly determined that it could not 

satisfy MCL 421.13m(2)(a)(i)(A) by reporting no employees or no payroll for the eight 

quarters before January 1, 2014. In addition to the brief, the appellant shall electronically 

file an appendix conforming to MCR 7.312(D)(2). In the brief, citations to the record 

must provide the appendix page numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). The appellee 

shall file a supplemental brief within 21 days of being served with the appellant’s brief. 

The appellee shall also electronically file an appendix, or in the alternative, stipulate to 

the use of the appendix filed by the appellant. A reply, if any, must be filed by the 

appellant within 14 days of being served with the appellee’s brief. The parties should not 

submit mere restatements of their application papers.

The Labor Law and Business Law Sections of the State Bar of Michigan, the 

Michigan Chamber of Commerce, the Employers Association of West Michigan, and the 

Small Business Association of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other 

persons or groups interested in the determination of the issue presented in this case may 

move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7164

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. JERMAINE JERRELL SIMS, a/k/a Justice, a/k/a Jus, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (3:98-cr-00045-CMH-1)

Submitted: November 13, 2008 Decided: November 20, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jermaine Jerrell Sims, Appellant Pro Se. Nicholas Stephan Altimari, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, Kenneth E. Melson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jermaine Jerrell Sims seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his Motion for Independent Action for Relief from Judgment. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Sims has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
##### 



EXHIBIT 32

Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Onyx Acceptance Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John
W. Hall, President, CEO and Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ JOHN W. HALL
Name: John W. Hall
Title: President, CEO and Principal Executive Officer
Date: August 19, 2003

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
and not for any other purpose.





---



##### 



EXHIBIT 32

Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Onyx Acceptance Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Don P.
Duffy, EVP, CFO and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ DON P. DUFFY
Name: Don P. Duffy
Title: Executive Vice President,
CFO and Principal Financial Officer
Date: August 19, 2003

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
and not for any other purpose.