alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Migo Software, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard Liebman,
      Chief
      Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
      August 14, 2007





/s/
      Richard Liebman


Richard
      Liebman


Chief
      Financial Officer


Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer




The
        foregoing Certification shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by
        any
        general statement incorporating by reference this report into any filing
        under
        the Securities Act of 1933 or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
        except
        to the extent that we specifically incorporate this information by reference,
        and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

The undersigned executive officer of FirstFederal Bancshares of Arkansas, Inc. (the “Registrant”) hereby certifiesthat the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended June 30,2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained thereinfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.

 

 
|                                        | By:    | /s/ Larry J. Brandt     |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                                        |   | Larry J. Brandt         |
|                                        |   | Chief Executive Officer |
|                                        |   |                    |
| Date:   August 7,  2009 |   |                    |

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.14

                              AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE
                               TO THE AVIALL, INC.
                 AMENDED AND RESTATED 1998 DIRECTORS STOCK PLAN

         THIS AMENDMENT TO THE AVIALL, INC. AMENDED AND RESTATED 1998 DIRECTORS
STOCK PLAN (this "Amendment"), dated as of June 14, 2002, is made and entered
into by Aviall, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"). Terms used in this
Amendment with initial capital letters that are not otherwise defined herein
shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Aviall, Inc. Amended and
Restated 1998 Directors Stock Plan (the "Plan").

                                    RECITALS

         WHEREAS, Section XI of the Plan provides that the Board of Directors of
the Company (the "Board") may amend the Plan at any time, provided however, that
the Board of Directors of the Company must obtain stockholder approval to
increase the total number of shares of Common Stock that may be granted under
the Plan as set forth in Paragraph B of Section III of the Plan; and

         WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan to increase the aggregate
number of shares of Common Stock (as defined in the Plan) that may be granted
under the Plan set forth in Paragraph B of Section III of the Plan; and

         WHEREAS, the Board submitted the proposal to amend the Plan to the
Company's stockholders at the 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders; and

         WHEREAS, the Company's stockholders approved the proposal to amend the
Plan to increase the aggregate number of Common Stock;

         NOW, THEREFORE, in accordance with Section XI of the Plan, the Company
hereby amends the Plan as follows:

1. Paragraph B of Section III of the Plan is hereby amended, effective June 14,
2002, by deleting said Paragraph in its entirety and substituting in lieu
thereof the following:

         B. Maximum Number of Shares That May be Granted - There may be granted
         under the Plan an aggregate of not more than two hundred forty-seven
         thousand five hundred (247,500) shares of Common Stock, subject to
         adjustment as provided in Section IX hereof. Shares of Common Stock
         granted pursuant to the Plan may be either authorized, but unissued,
         shares or reacquired shares, or both.

2. Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, the Plan shall continue in
full force and effect in accordance with the provisions thereof.


<PAGE>



         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be duly
executed as of the date first written above.

                                    AVIALL, INC.

                                    By:      /s/ Jeffrey J. Murphy
                                             -----------------------------------
                                    Name:    Jeffrey J. Murphy
                                    Title:   Senior Vice President, Law & Human
                                             Resources, Secretary and General
                                             Counsel
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Adren JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-50098 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed January 31, 2018

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Adren Jackson, Pro Se

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Adren Jackson has' moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Jackson has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

**Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 (321)-261-2547 

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com

July 22, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Bldg. 10A

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

RE: Summary Grant for ProCore Drones, LLC Exemption Request Under 

Section 333 of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Modernization and 

Reform Act of 2012, 49 U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11

Dear Sir or Madam:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), 49 

U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, ProCore Drones, LLC., an aerial video and 

photography service company and operator of small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS),

seeks an exemption from the following listed Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to allow 

commercial operation of the Leptron RDASS and the Yuneec Q500 within the National 

Airspace System (NAS) for controlled, low-risk, aerial video and photography of Real 

Estate Properties, (for homeowners, realtors, home builders, home contractors and / or 

home inspectors for real estate marketing and inspection of home exteriors), land survey, 

filming of special events, as well as operations in support of law enforcement and first 

responder activities including crime scene reconstruction, traffic accidents, search and 

rescue, and fire rescue and spotter. 

ProCore Drones, in the accompanying petition, seeks exemption from the requirements 

of 14 C.F.R. §§ 45.27(a), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.105, 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(b), 

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2),and 91.417(a) and (b). 

ProCore Drones has requested that the FAA not request public comment on its petition 

because it would not set any precedent and because the relief requested is identical to 

numerous exemptions granted previously. 14 C.F.R. § 11.87. 

In addition, ProCore Drones will be utilizing the same Leptron RDASS and Yuneec Q500 

proven technologies the FAA has already accepted and approved for Exemption Nos. 

11727, 11777, and 12086. All of the appropriate documentation to accompany ProCore 

Drones Section 333 Petition is included. Combined, their comprehensive Section 333 
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 (321)-261-2547 

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com

Exemption and the approvals the FAA has already given to their chosen products and the 

technology, should provide the support necessary to the FAA for a Summary Grant of 

ProCore Drone’s Section 333 Petition and expedite the process. 

Kelly J. Neubecker

CEO

UASolutions Group, Inc.

CC:

Bill Crozier

Joe Morra

Jake Troutman

Dean Griffith, Esq.

Robert Papas
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001006762
<NAME> ARCA CORP.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          64,185
<SECURITIES>                                     7,155
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,169
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               243,415
<PP&E>                                       3,595,958
<DEPRECIATION>                                 252,617
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,679,974
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          227,149
<BONDS>                                      3,516,574
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           239
<OTHER-SE>                                    (73,931)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,679,974
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               598,073
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  429,520
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             225,131
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (56,521)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (56,521)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (56,521)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
No. 11-1025.

#### Clapper, Director of National Intelligence, et al. *v.*Amnesty International USA et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. [Certiorari granted, 566 U. S. 1009.] Motion of the Solicitor General to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 177

Recognizing the Hermann Monument and Hermann Heights Park in New

Ulm, Minnesota, as a national symbol of the contributions of Americans

of German heritage.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 24, 1997

Mr. MINGE submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Resources

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the Hermann Monument and Hermann Heights

Park in New Ulm, Minnesota, as a national symbol of

the contributions of Americans of German heritage.

Whereas there are currently more than 57,900,000 individuals of German heritage residing in the United States,

who comprise nearly 25 percent of the population of the

United States and are therefore the largest ethnic group

in the United States;

Whereas those of German heritage are not merely descendants of one political entity, but of all German speaking

areas;

Whereas numerous Americans of German heritage have made

countless contributions to American culture, arts, and industry, the American military, and American government;
2

•HCON 177 IH

Whereas there is no recognized tangible, national symbol

dedicated to German Americans and their positive contributions to the United States;

Whereas the story of Hermann the Cheruscan parallels that

of the American Founding Fathers, because he was a

freedom fighter who united ancient German tribes in

order to shed the yoke of Roman tyranny and preserve

freedom for the territory of present-day Germany;

Whereas the Hermann Monument located in Hermann

Heights Park in New Ulm, Minnesota, was dedicated in

1897 in honor of the spirit of freedom and later dedicated to all German immigrants who settled in New Ulm

and elsewhere in the United States; and

Whereas the Hermann Monument has been recognized as a

site of special historical significance by the United States

Government, by placement on the National Register of

Historic Places: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Hermann Monument and Hermann

3 Heights Park in New Ulm, Minnesota, are recognized by

4 the Congress to be a national symbol for the contributions

5 of Americans of German heritage.

Æ
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 184

Making majority party appointments to certain Senate committees for the

104th Congress.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 12 (legislative day, OCTOBER 10), 1995

Mr. KEMPTHORNE (for Mr. DOLE) submitted the following resolution; which

was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Making majority party appointments to certain Senate

committees for the 104th Congress.

1 Resolved, That the following shall constitute the ma2 jority party’s membership on the following standing com3 mittees for the 104th Congress, or until their successors

4 are chosen:

5 COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE: Mr. Lugar, Mr. Dole,

6 Mr. Helms, Mr. Cochran, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Craig, Mr.

7 Coverdell, Mr. Santorum, Mr. Warner, and Mr. Grassley.

8 COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN

9 AFFAIRS: Mr. D’Amato, Mr. Gramm, Mr. Shelby, Mr.
2

SRES 184 ATS

1 Bond, Mr. Mack, Mr. Faircloth, Mr. Bennett, Mr. Grams,

2 and Mr. Domenici.

3 COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANS4 PORTATION: Mr. Pressler, Mr. Stevens, Mr. McCain, Mr.

5 Burns, Mr. Gorton, Mr. Lott, Mrs. Hutchison, Ms. Snowe,

6 Mr. Ashcroft, and Mr. Frist.

7 COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS: Mr. Ste8 vens, Mr. Roth, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Thompson, Mr. Cochran,

9 Mr. McCain, Mr. Smith, and Mr. Brown.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 97 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 97

Expressing the sense of the Senate with respect to peace and stability 
                        in the South China Sea.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 30 (legislative day, March 27), 1995

     Mr. Thomas (for himself and Mr. Robb) submitted the following 
  resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Senate with respect to peace and stability 
                        in the South China Sea.

Whereas the South China Sea is a strategically important waterway through which 
        transits approximately 25 percent of the World's ocean freight, 
        including almost 70 percent of Japan's oil supply;
Whereas the South China Sea serves as a crucial sea lane for naval vessels of 
        the United States and other countries, especially in times of emergency;
Whereas the People's Republic of China, the Republic of the Philippines, the 
        Socialist Republic of Vietnam, the Republic of China on Taiwan, the 
        State of Brunei Darussalam, and Malaysia have overlapping and mutually 
        exclusive claims to portions of the South China Sea, especially in the 
        Spratly Island group;
Whereas these competing claims have led to armed conflicts between several of 
        the claimants;
Whereas these conflicts threaten the peace and stability of all of East Asia; 
        and
Whereas the 1992 Manila Declaration of the Association of South East Asian 
        Nations, also recognized by the Socialist Republic of Vietnam and the 
        People's Republic of China, calls on the claimants to exercise restraint 
        and seek a peaceful negotiated solution to the conflicts: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) urges the executive branch to reiterate to the 
        claimants in the South China Sea that the United States does 
        not take a position on any individual claim;
            (2) calls upon all of the claimants to refrain from using 
        military force to assert or expand territorial claims in the 
        South China Sea;
            (3) urges the executive branch to declare the active 
        support of the United States for the 1992 Manila Declaration of 
        the Association of South East Asian Nations, and calls upon all 
        the claimants to observe faithfully its provisions; and
            (4) calls upon the claimants to scrupulously observe the 
        January, 1995 status quo ante pending any negotiations or 
        resolution of the conflicts between such claimants over such 
        claims.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald WARDRICK, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-7299

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 15, 2018

Decided: February 20, 2018

Donald Wardrick, Appellant Pro Se. David Ira Salem, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*272PER CURIAM:

Donald Wardrick appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Wardrick,*No. 1:95-cr-00294-PJM-1 (D. Md. Sept. 14, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

July 24, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00396

- CV

IN RE John M. DONOHUE

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

On June 13, 2019, relator filed a “Request for Extension of Time to File Petition for Writ of Mandamus.” On June 17, 2019, this court ordered relator to file a petition no later than July 8, 2019. Relator has not filed a petition; therefore, we DISMISS t his original proceeding for want of prosecution.

It is so ORDERED on July 24, 2019.

_____________________________ Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 24th day of July, 2019

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. CV

- 19

- 0000010, styled John M. Donohue Ex Parte , pending in the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas, the Honorable M. Rex Emerson presiding.
Exhibit 32.2


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, John Stephens, Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, of Biofield
Corp. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended
     June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
     78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 14, 2003                  By: /s/ JOHN D. STEPHENS
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           John D. Stephens
                                           Senior Vice President and Chief
                                           Operating Officer (Principal
                                           Accounting and Financial Officer)


                                       23
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Party City Corporation
(the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
period ended September 27, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



| |                                                                                                                                                          
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

| |  |                               
| |  | ------------------------------
| |  | /s/ NANCY PEDOT               
| |  |                               
| |  | Nancy Pedot                   
| |  | Acting Chief Executive Officer

Dated: November 12, 2003

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the
Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
such filing.