alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OSIEL ALVAREZ PDR NO.

-(EOfciVtD IK

v. COA NO. 11-14-00294-CR ^OURTOfopimimai APPEALS

„m m __ mrn„,0 TRIAL COURT NO. A-42,672 nr_ STATE OF TEXAS t£C 22 2016

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AT AUSTIN, TEXAS AbelAcosta. Clerk woua, v/i©ll\

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRECTIONARY REVIEW ALONG

WITH MOTION TO SUSPEND TRAP 9.3 (b) (1)

COMES NOW, OSIEL ALVAREZ, TDCJ-CID NO. 01967111, IN THE ABOVE REFERENCED CAUSE

NUMBERS AND FILES THIS MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME REQUESTING AN EXTENSION OF

60 DAYS IN WHICH TO FILE ALONG WITH MOTION TO SUSPEND TRAP 9.3 AW.XjU-AND-TO,

OUUH f OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

SUPPORT SHOWS THE FOLLOWING: p-r, ^^

I.

PETITIONER WAS CONVICTED IN THE 70TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF ECTOfP^OUnWJ®' ^8rk

TEXAS, OF THE OFFENSE OF AGGRAVATED ROBBERY IN.THE ABOVE REFERENCED TRIAL COURT

NUMBER, THIS CAUSE WAS APPEALED TO THE ELEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AND WAS AFFIRMED

ON OR ABOUT NOVEMBER 30, 2016.

II.

PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND SUSPENSION OF TRAP 9.3 (b) (1)

IS BASED ON THE FACT THAT HE IS PRESENTLY INCARCERATED IN THE TDCJ-CID AT THE

ALLAN B. POLUNSKY UNIT IN LIVINGSTON, TEXAS 77351, AND IS PROCEEDING PRO-SE AND

REQUIRES ADDITIONAL TIME TO RESEARCH AND THE POLUNSKY UNIT DOES NOT PROVIDE ACCESS

TO A COPY MACHINE AND THIS BECOMES A BURDEN ON PETITIONER.

WHEREFORE PREMISES CONSIDERED PETITIONER PRAYS THAT THIS MOTION FOR EXTENSION

OF TIME ALONG WITH HIS REQUEST TO SUSPEND TRAP 9.3 (b) (1) BE GRANTED.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

cc. file CM/Jr (Zha/bto , , OSIEL ALVAREZ pf"

' POLUNSKY UNIT- TDCJ-CID NO. 01967111

3872 F.M. 350 SOUTH

LIVINGSTON, TEXAS 77351

Sgmt tas been ser* *0 dtslricl att*»f \n tcW to*ty .Tttas.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           7,288
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             372
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         128,137
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           129,479
<LOANS>                                        446,406
<ALLOWANCE>                                        754
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 599,945
<DEPOSITS>                                     466,218
<SHORT-TERM>                                    15,525
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,064
<LONG-TERM>                                     31,988
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,711
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,427
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 599,945
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 26,771
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,656
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   117
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                32,544
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              18,011
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,098
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           13,446
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       25
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,916
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,914
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,459
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,459
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .96
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.80
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,019
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  5,347
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,196
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      470
<RECOVERIES>                                         3
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  754
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                76
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            678
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dontae PINKNEY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-4297

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 28, 2017

Decided: January 22, 2018

John E. Duncan, Lexington, South Carolina, for Appellant. Beth Drake, United States Attorney, Jimmie Ewing, Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appel-lee.

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dontae Pinkney seeks to appeal the 125-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to Hobbs Act robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (2012). On appeal, he argues that the district court abused its discretion in upwardly departing, which resulted in an unreasonable sentence. The Government seeks to dismiss the appeal as barred by Pinkney’s waiver of the right to appeal included in the plea agreement. Upon review of the plea agreement and the transcript of the Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 hearing, we conclude that Pinkney knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal and that the issue Pinkney seeks to raise on appeal falls squarely within the compass of his waiver of appellate rights. *See United States v. Archie,*771 F.3d 217, 221 (4th Cir. 2014). We therefore dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 21-3133

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Justin Dwight Sholley-Gonzalez lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central

____________ Submitted: March 2, 2022 Filed: March 7, 2022 [Published]

____________ Before SMITH, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Justin Sholley-Gonzalez appeals the sentence imposed by the district court 1 following this court’s remand for resentencing on his conviction for firearm offenses.

1 The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.On appeal, Sholley-Gonzalez argues that the district court erred in calculating his

Guidelines range and imposed a substantively unreasonable sentence. Upon careful review, we conclude the district court did not clearly err in finding that Sholley-Gonzalez was not entitled to a reduction for possessing the ammunition for a lawful sporting purpose, see U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(2) (if the defendant possessed all ammunition and firearms solely for lawful sporting purposes or collection, decrease the offense level to 6); United States v. Lussier, 423 F.3d 838, 842-43 (8th Cir. 2005) (application of the Guidelines is reviewed de novo and factual findings are reviewed for clear error; it is defendant’s burden to show he possessed all ammunition and firearms solely for lawful sporting purposes); and we note that any error in the court’s determination was harmless in any event, as the court stated it would have given Sholley-Gonzalez the same sentence even if it had found the reduction applied, see United States v. Shuler, 598 F.3d 444, 447 (8th Cir. 2010) (procedural errors in determining advisory Guidelines range are subject to harmless error analysis); United States v. Spikes, 543 F.3d 1021, 1025-26 (8th Cir. 2008) (where it is clear that sentencing court would have imposed same sentence regardless of whether appellant’s argument for lower Guidelines range ultimately prevailed, there can be no reversible error in sentence). We also conclude that the district court did not impose a substantively unreasonable sentence, as the court properly considered the factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and did not err in weighing the relevant factors. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (sentences are reviewed for substantive reasonableness under deferential abuse of discretion standard; abuse of discretion occurs when court fails to consider relevant factor, gives significant weight to improper or irrelevant factor, or commits clear error of judgment in weighing appropriate factors); see also United States v. Mangum, 625 F.3d 466, 469-70 (8th Cir. 2010) (upward variance was reasonable where court made individualized assessment based on facts presented). -2-Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________

-3-
**Exhibit 15.2**

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-203266) of our report dated October 1, 2014, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of GTECH S.p.A. as of December 31, 2013 and for each of the two years in the period then ended included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2014.

 

 
| /s/**Reconta   Ernst & Young S.p.A. |   |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                         |   |
| Rome, Italy                             |   |
| May 15,   2015                          |   |

 

----
Exhibit 31

Certifications

I, Richard Simpson, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2014-GC25 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas; CoreLogic Solutions, LLC; CWCapital Asset Management LLC; Computershare Trust Company, National Association; Pentalpha Surveillance LLC; LNR Partners, LLC;and Wilmington Trust, National Association.

Date:March 31, 2022

|  | /s/ Richard Simpson___________________Richard SimpsonPresident, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

CGCMT 2014-GC25 Certifications
EX-35 (c)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

March 13, 2007

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for Morgan Stanley Mortgage Loan Trust
2006-17XS

Per Section 9.11 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 12/1/2006,
the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Master Servicer), hereby
certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:

(A)    a review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year or
       portion thereof and of such party's performance under this Agreement, or
       such other applicable agreement in the case of an Additional Servicer,
       has been made under such officer's supervision

(B)    to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such party
       has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, or such other
       applicable agreement in the case of an Additional Servicer, in all
       material respects throughout such year or portion thereof, or, if there
       has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material
       respect, specifying each such failure known to such officer and the
       nature and status thereof and

(C)    in the case of the Master Servicer, to the best of such officer's
       knowledge, each Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under its
       Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such year, or, if
       there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material
       respect specifying each such failure known to such officer and the nature
       and status thereof


Certified By:
/s/ Reid Denny
REID DENNY, VICE PRESIDENT

Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 15.1


Penske Motorsports, Inc.
Detroit, Michigan

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Penske Motorsports, Inc. for the periods ended June 30, 1998 and
1997, as indicated in our report dated July 30, 1998; because we did not perform
an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-692 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Detroit, Michigan

August 13, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001006604
<NAME> HOUSECALL MEDICAL RESOURCES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,548
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,014
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,552
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,365
<PP&E>                                           8,885
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,466
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 109,916
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,438
<BONDS>                                         23,051
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           102
<OTHER-SE>                                      66,712
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   109,916
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                96,552
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,118
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                49,966
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,060
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,061
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,347
<INCOME-TAX>                                       549
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                798
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (735)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        63
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
No. D-2655.

#### In re Disbarment of Nwadike.

Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 566 U. S. 934.]
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6339 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6339

 To limit the use of the Judgement Fund to settle any lawsuit arising 
 under section 1342 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 17, 2016

  Mr. Griffith (for himself, Mr. Lance, and Mr. Pitts) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To limit the use of the Judgement Fund to settle any lawsuit arising 
 under section 1342 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON USE OF JUDGEMENT FUND.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no amounts may be paid 
from the fund established under section 1304 of title 31, United State 
Code (relating to judgments, awards, and compromise settlements), for 
any compromise settlement in connection with any proceeding brought 
against the Government under section 1342 of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18062(b)).
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 239 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

  2d Session
S. RES. 239

          To authorize representation by Senate Legal Counsel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 29, 1996

    Mr. Dole (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
          To authorize representation by Senate Legal Counsel.

Whereas, in the case of Robert E. Barrett v. United States Senate, et al., No. 
        96CV00385 (D.D.C.), pending in the United States District Court for the 
        District of Columbia, the plaintiff has named the United States Senate 
        as a defendant;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(1) (1994), the 
        Senate may direct its counsel to defend the Senate in civil actions 
        relating to its official responsibilities: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent 
the United States Senate in the case of Robert E. Barrett v. United 
States Senate, et al.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31


       Re:  Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC Trust 2006-FR4 (the
            "Trust"), Mortgage Pass Through Certificates, Series 2006-FR4,
            issued pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated
            as November 1, 2006 (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement"),
            by and among Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC, as
            depositor, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as trustee
            (the "Trustee"), Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
            custodian ( the "Custodian"), HomEq Servicing, as servicer
            (the "Servicer") and Fremont Investment & Loan, as responsible
            party

            I, Paul Menefee, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer,
            certify that:

            1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K ("Annual
Report"), and all reports on Form 10-D (collectively with this Annual Report,
the "Reports") required to be filed in respect of period covered by this Annual
Report, of the Trust;

            2.  Based on my knowledge, the Reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this Annual Report;

            3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this Annual Report is included in the Reports;

            4.  Based on my knowledge and the compliance statements required in
this Annual Report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in
the Reports, the Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement in all material respects; and

            5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria required to be included in this
Annual Report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this Annual Report,
except as otherwise disclosed in this Annual Report.  Any material instances of
non-compliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this Annual
Report.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  the Trustee and the
Servicer.

         Date: March 30, 2007
By: /s/ Paul Menefee
Name: Paul Menefee
Title: Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer