alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES, LLC. , 2 Plaintiff-Appellee, 3
v. No. 35,742 4 SCOTT K. JEFFERS and 5 ATHENA JEFFERS, 6 Defendants-Appellants. 7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY 8 John F. Davis, District Judge 9 Benjamin Feuchter 10 Keleher & McLeod, P.A. 11 Albuquerque, NM 12 for Appellee 13 Scott K. Jeffers 14 Athena Jeffers 15 Rio Rancho, NM 16 Pro Se Appellees 17
MEMORANDUM OPINION 18 GARCIA, Judge. 19{1} Defendants-Appellants Scott K. Jeffers and Athena Jeffers (“Defendants”) 1 appeal, in a self-represented capacity, from the district court’s orders denying 2 Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of standing, and granting a motion for 3 summary judgment filed by Plaintiff-Appellee Pennymac Loan Services 4 (“Pennymac”). [RP 239, 241] Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons 5 stated in the notice of proposed dispositi on. Pennymac has filed a response in support 6 of our notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance 7 has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. 8 {2} Accordingly, we affirm. 9 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 10

___________________________________ 11 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 12
WE CONCUR: 13

___________________________________ 14 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 15

___________________________________ 16 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge 17
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Tennessee Valley Authority

# AGENCY:

Tennessee Valley Authority.

# ACTION:

60-Day notice of submission of information collection renewal approval and request for comments; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Tennessee Valley Authority published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of March 17, 2022, concerning a proposed information collection renewal that will be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The Tennessee Valley Authority is soliciting public comments on this proposed collection renewal. A form in said document was incorrectly referenced.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Public Information Collection Clearance Officer: Jennifer A. Wilds, Specialist, Records Compliance, Tennessee Valley Authority, 400 W Summit Hill Dr., CLK-320, Knoxville, TN 37902-1401; telephone (865) 632-6580 or by email                         *pra@tva.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

*Correction:*                     In the                     **Federal Register**                     of March 17, 2022, in FR Doc. 2022-05647, on page 15300, in the 3rd column, in the “Need for and Use of Information Section”, correct the title of form “Tennessee Valley Authority Floating Cabin Electrical Inspection Form (TVA Form 21382)” to read: “Tennessee Valley Authority Floating Cabin Electrical Certification Form (TVA Form 21382)”.                

Dated: March 17, 2022.

Rebecca L. Coffey,

Agency Records Officer.

[FR Doc. 2022-06244 Filed 3-23-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8120-08-P
# Official Journal C 84/6 Ap

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 84 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 486 April 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 84

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 486 April 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 084/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2005/C 084/2 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M. 3780 — ABN AMRO/Banca Antonveneta) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 2 |
| 2005/C 084/3 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3736 — EQT/GSCP/ISS/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 3 |
| 2005/C 084/4 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3768 — BBVA/BNL) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 4 |
| 2005/C 084/5 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3753 — Kodak/Creo) (1) | 5 |
| 2005/C 084/6 | Information procedure — Technical rules (1) | 6 |
| 2005/C 084/7 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3747 — Rautaruukki/Wärtsilä/SKF/JV) (1) | 12 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 084/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2005/C 084/2

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M. 3780 — ABN AMRO/Banca Antonveneta) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

2

2005/C 084/3

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3736 — EQT/GSCP/ISS/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

3

2005/C 084/4

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3768 — BBVA/BNL) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

4

2005/C 084/5

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3753 — Kodak/Creo) (1)

5

2005/C 084/6

Information procedure — Technical rules (1)

6

2005/C 084/7

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3747 — Rautaruukki/Wärtsilä/SKF/JV) (1)

12

---

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 084/8 | F-Cayenne: operation of scheduled air services — Invitation to tender issued by France pursuant to Article 4(1)(d) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 for the operation of scheduled air services between Cayenne on the one hand, and Maripasoula, Saül, Saint Georges de l'Oyapock and Grand Santi via Saint Laurent du Maroni on the other (1) | 13 |

III   Notices

Commission

2005/C 084/8

F-Cayenne: operation of scheduled air services — Invitation to tender issued by France pursuant to Article 4(1)(d) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 for the operation of scheduled air services between Cayenne on the one hand, and Maripasoula, Saül, Saint Georges de l'Oyapock and Grand Santi via Saint Laurent du Maroni on the other (1)

13

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Rice Midstream Partners LP (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel J. Rice IV, Director and Chief Executive Officer of Rice Midstream Management LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:


|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




|    |                                                                                                                                                         
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.




/s/ Daniel J. Rice IV


Daniel J. Rice IV


Director, Chief Executive Officer


Rice Midstream Management LLC, as general


partner of the Partnership


(Principal Executive Officer)





Date: March 13, 2015
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 152

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 19, 1998

Received and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that all parties to

the multiparty peace talks regarding Northern Ireland

should condemn violence and fully integrate internationally recognized human rights standards and adequately

address outstanding human rights violations as part of

the peace process.

Whereas multiparty talks regarding Northern Ireland attended by representatives of the British and Irish Governments and representatives elected from political parties in Northern Ireland are underway for the first time

since the partition of Ireland in 1922 creating a momentous opportunity for progress on human rights concerns;
2

HCON 152 RFS

Whereas human rights violations and the lack of accountability by those responsible for such violations have been persistent features of the conflict in Northern Ireland; and

Whereas more than 3,000 people have died and thousands

more have been injured as a result of the political violence in Northern Ireland since 1969: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) the Congress condemns the violence com4 mitted on all sides of the conflict in Northern Ire5 land as illegal, unjust, and inhumane;

6 (2) the Congress commends the leadership in

7 both the British and Irish Governments and former

8 United States Senator George Mitchell, Independent

9 Chairman of the multiparty talks, for fostering a

10 new environment in which human rights concerns

11 may be addressed and an agreement may be reached

12 expeditiously through inclusive talks with respect to

13 Northern Ireland; and

14 (3) it is the sense of the Congress that—

15 (A) all parties should reject violence and

16 work diligently through democratic, peaceful

17 means to reach a just and lasting peace in

18 Northern Ireland;

19 (B) human rights should be protected for

20 all citizens and any peace agreement in North-
3

HCON 152 RFS

1 ern Ireland must recognize the state’s obliga2 tion to protect human rights in all cir3 cumstances; and

4 (C) there are a number of measures which

5 can be taken immediately that would remedy

6 abusive human rights policies and build con7 fidence in the peace process, such as acting

8 upon the Standing Advisory Commission on

9 Human Rights (SACHR) report and rec10 ommendations put forth by other human rights

11 organizations.

Passed the House of Representatives March 18,

1998.

Attest: Robin H. Carle,

Clerk.
# EUR-Lex - 32001D0196 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32001D0196

**2001/196/EC: Council Decision of 26 February 2001 concerning the conclusion of an Agreement between the European Community and the United States of America renewing a programme of cooperation in higher education and vocational education and training **

*
Official Journal L 071 , 13/03/2001 P. 0007 - 0007 *

Council Decision

of 26 February 2001

concerning the conclusion of an Agreement between the European Community and the United States of America renewing a programme of cooperation in higher education and vocational education and training

(2001/196/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 149 and 150 in conjunction with Article 300(3), first subparagraph thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament,

Whereas:

(1) By its Decision of 22 May 2000 the Council authorised the Commission to negotiate Agreements for cooperation in higher education and vocational training between the European Community, Canada and the United States of America.

(2) The Community and the United States of America expect to obtain mutual benefit from such cooperation, which must, on the Community's side, be complementary to the bilateral programmes between the Member States and the United States of America and provide a European added value.

(3) The Agreement between the European Community and the United States of America renewing a programme of cooperation in higher education and vocational education and training should be approved,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Agreement between the European Community and the United States of America renewing a programme of cooperation in higher education and vocational education and training is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.

The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision.

Article 2

The delegation of the European Community to the Joint Committee referred to in Article 6 of the Agreement shall consist of a representative from the Commission assisted by a representative from each Member State.

Article 3

The President of the Council shall carry out the notification provided for in Article 12 of the Agreement.

Done at Brussels, 26 February 2001.

For the Council

The President

A. Lindh
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael CROMWELL, a/k/a Mike Tyson, a/k/a Mikey, a/k/a Charlie, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-7389

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 30, 2018

Decided: February 2, 2018

*164Michael Cromwell, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Evan DePadilla, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Cromwell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.*
      *United States v. Cromwell,*No. 2:11-cr-00009-AWA-DEM-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 15, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*

Because Cromwell does not challenge on appeal the district court's disposition of his claim based on Amendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines, he has forfeited appellate review of that issue, *See*4th Cir. R, 34(b).
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Warren Anthony JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-50382 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 20, 2017

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Warren Anthony Johnson, Pro Se

Before JONES, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Warren Anthony Johnson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Johnson has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under *273the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 23, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 16544]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06153]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 11687]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Philip Guston Now'' 
Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad 
pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for 
temporary display in the exhibition ``Philip Guston Now'' at the Museum 
of Fine Arts, Boston, in Boston, Massachusetts; the Museum of Fine 
Arts, Houston, in Houston, Texas; the National Gallery of Art, 
Washington, District of Columbia; and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural 
significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display 
within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. 
I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published 
in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#92e1f7f1e6fbfdfca0a6a7abd2e1e6f3e6f7bcf5fde4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="790a1c1a0d1016174b4d4c40390a0d180d1c571e160f">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 
of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.

Stacy E. White,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2022-06153 Filed 3-22-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 2

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to allow

the President to veto items of appropriation.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. THURMOND (for himself, Mr. DOLE, and Mr. SIMPSON) introduced the

following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to allow the President to veto items of appropriation.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes

6 as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legisla7 tures of three-fourths of the several States within seven

8 years after the date of its submission to the States for

9 ratification:
2

SJ 2 IS

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘The President may disapprove any item of appro3 priation in any Act or joint resolution. If an Act or joint

4 resolution is approved by the President, any item of appro5 priation contained therein which is not disapproved shall

6 become law. The President shall return with his objections

7 any item of appropriation disapproved to the House in

8 which the Act or joint resolution containing such item

9 originated. The Congress may, in the manner prescribed

10 under section 7 of article I for Acts disapproved by the

11 President, reconsider any item of appropriation dis12 approved under this article.’’.

Æ
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 

REGION VII
 

901 NORTH 5TH STREET 

KANSAS CITY, KANSAS 66101 

September 23, 2011 

Valentin O Iniestra 

4755 South 18 Street 

Omaha, Nebraska 68107 

RE: SAID: 48975 

4755 South 18 Street 

Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Assessment 

Dear Owner/Resident: 

A Lead Based Paint assessment was recently performed on your property by the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency as part of the Omaha Lead site investigation. The purpose of 

this assessment is to determine whether a significant quantity of LBP is present on the exterior 

surface of structures, where deteriorating paint conditions (peeling, flaking, cracking, etc) exist 

that might increase lead concentrations in the yard above acceptable levels. 

Enclosed are the LBP assessment sheets for 4755 South 18 Street. The EPA has developed paint 

stabilization eligibility criteria that involve measuring the amount of deteriorated LBP on a 

structure and calculating the concentration of lead in soils around the home that would result if 

all of the identified deteriorated paint were to fall to the ground and uniformly mix with the soil 

under certain assumptions. During the LBP assessment, the areal extent of the deteriorated paint 

observed on structure surfaces was estimated and the lead content in the deteriorated paint was 

measured using an X-Ray Fluorescence instrument. 

The data obtained during the LBP assessment was used to estimate the increase in soil lead 

concentration that would result if all of the deteriorating paint identified in the assessment were 

to fall to the ground and mix with surface soil within six feet of the foundation of the structure. 

For purposes of this calculation, the deteriorating LBP on a structure is assumed to fall onto the 

ground surface within six feet of the foundation and be uniformly mixed with the top one inch 

of soil. The estimated lead concentration in the soil potentially caused by the deteriorating LBP 

provides a measure of the severity of LBP deterioration on individual structures. The EPA uses 

these criteria to rank properties based on the potential for recontamination of soil to occur. Paint 

stabilization is being offered at only those households with the most severe LBP problems, 

particularly where children under the age of seven reside. 

The LBP assessment performed by the EPA using the above criteria indicated that your 

house IS NOT eligible for paint stabilization. 
 

 

 

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact the EPA Public Information Center at 

(402) 731-3045. 

Sincerely, 

Pauletta R. France-Isetts 

Project Coordinator 

Environmental Protection Agency 

Enclosures 

Para información en español, llame al EPA Information Center (402) 731-3045. 
Omaha Lead Site LBP Assessment