alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013193EN.01001201.xml

| 4.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 193/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 193/12

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

2013/C 193/08

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 13 March 2013 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 73095 |
| Decision number | : | 104/13/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | National Seed Capital Scheme |
| Legal basis | : | Prop. 111 S (2011-2012) Tilleggsbevilgninger og omprioriteringer i statsbudsjettet 2012 – Meld. St. (2011-2012) Verktøy for vekst – Om Innovasjon Norge og SIVA SF |
| Type of measure | : | Aid scheme |
| Objective | : | Risk capital |
| Form of aid | : | Provision of risk capital, grant to investors |
| Budget | : | Overall budget: NOK 1,5 billion |
| Duration | : | Funds to be set up by 2017, investment phase of five years |
| Economic sectors | : | All sectors |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Innovation Norway |
| PO Box 448, Sentrum |
| 0104 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

13 March 2013

Case number

:

73095

Decision number

:

104/13/COL

EFTA State

:

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

National Seed Capital Scheme

Legal basis

:

Prop. 111 S (2011-2012) Tilleggsbevilgninger og omprioriteringer i statsbudsjettet 2012 – Meld. St. (2011-2012) Verktøy for vekst – Om Innovasjon Norge og SIVA SF

Type of measure

:

Aid scheme

Objective

:

Risk capital

Form of aid

:

Provision of risk capital, grant to investors

Budget

:

Overall budget: NOK 1,5 billion

Duration

:

Funds to be set up by 2017, investment phase of five years

Economic sectors

:

All sectors

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Innovation Norway

PO Box 448, Sentrum

0104 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 237

To express the sense of the Senate regarding reduction of the national

debt.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 29, 1996

Mr. FAIRCLOTH submitted the following resolution; which was referred jointly

pursuant to the order of August 4, 1977, to the Committees on the

Budget and Governmental Affairs, with instructions that if one Committee reports, the other Committee have thirty days to report or be

discharged

RESOLUTION

To express the sense of the Senate regarding reduction of

the national debt.

Whereas the United States national debt is approximately

$4.9 trillion;

Whereas the Congress has authorized the national debt by

law to reach $5.5 trillion;

Whereas the 104th Congress and the President have both

presented plans to balance the budget by the year 2002,

by which time our national debt will be approximately

$6.5 trillion;

Whereas this accumulated debt represents a significant financial burden that will require excessive taxation and lost
2

SRES 237 RIS

economic opportunity for future generations of the

United States;

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that any

2 comprehensive legislation that balances the budget by a

3 certain date and that is agreed to by the Congress and

4 the President shall also contain a strategy for reducing

5 the national debt of the United States.

Æ
#### Gregory Keith JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Theresa SCHRODER, Administration Warden; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-15605

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed December 26, 2017

Gregory Keith Jones, Pro Se

Paul Edward Carter, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Arizona Attorney General, Tucson, AZ, for Defendants-Ap-pellees

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*378MEMORANDUM **

Arizona state prisoner Gregory Keith Jones appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 action alleging constitutional claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Glenn v. Washington County,*673 F.3d 864, 870 (9th Cir. 2011), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Jones’s access-to-courts claim related to the withholding of affidavits in 2013 because Jones failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants caused injury to a nonfrivolous or arguable underlying claim. *See Phillips v. Hust, 477*F.3d 1070, 1075-76 (9th Cir. 2007) (setting forth elements of an access-to-courts claim relating to a lost opportunity to present a legal claim), *vacated on other*grounds, 555 U.S. 1150, 129 S.Ct. 1036, 173 L.Ed.2d 466 (2009).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Jones’s legal mail claim relating to the withholding of Jones’s mail in 2013 because Jones failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether the subject mail constituted legal mail. *See Wolff v. McDonnell,*418 U.S. 539, 576, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974) (stating that legal mail must “be specially marked as originating from an attorney, with his name and address being given, if [it is] to receive special treatment”).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Jones’s retaliation claim and legal mail claim related to the withholding of his mail in 2012 because Jones failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether he properly exhausted administrative remedies or whether administrative remedies were effectively unavailable to him. *See Woodford v. Ngo,*548 U.S. 81, 90, 126 S.Ct. 2378, 165 L.Ed.2d 368 (2006) (“[P]roper exhaustion of administrative remedies .,. means using all steps that the agency holds out, and doing so properly (so that the agency addresses the issues on the merits).” (citation, internal quotation marks, and emphasis omitted)).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is *not*precedent *except*as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Form 10-KSB of Cyberspace Vita, Inc. (the "Company") for the
year  ended  December  31,  2007  as filed with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on  the  date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,  Eleanor  Yarbray,  Chief
Financial Officer of the  Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that
based on my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in  all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







                         DATE: March 7, 2008


                         /S/ ELEANOR YARBRAY
                         -------------------
                            ELEANOR YARBRAY
                            CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6475 

To remove reversionary clauses on property owned by the municipality of 

Anchorage, Alaska. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 7, 2016 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To remove reversionary clauses on property owned by the 

municipality of Anchorage, Alaska. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ANCHORAGE, ALASKA, CONVEYANCE OF RE4 VERSIONARY INTERESTS. 

5 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

6 (1) CITY.—The term ‘‘City’’ means the Munici7 pality of Anchorage, Alaska. 

8 (2) NON-FEDERAL LAND.—The term ‘‘non-Fed9 eral land’’ means certain parcels of land located in 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6475 IH

1 the City and owned by the City, which are more par2 ticularly described as follows: 

3 (A) Tracts 4 and 6, Tudor Municipal Cam4 pus, Anchorage Recording District, Third Judi5 cial District, State of Alaska, consisting of ap6 proximately 7.9 acres in Tract 4 and 19.8 acres 

7 in Tract 6, located along Dr. Martin Luther 

8 King Jr. Avenue. 

9 (B) Lot 18A Less W20′, Block 16, Origi10 nal Townsite of Anchorage, Anchorage Record11 ing District, Third Judicial District, State of 

12 Alaska, consisting of approximately 0.16 acres, 

13 commonly known as Cottage 25, located at 646 

14 West 3rd Avenue. 

15 (C) Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block K, North Ad16 dition #4 to Townsite of Anchorage, Anchorage 

17 Recording District, Third Judicial District, 

18 State of Alaska, consisting of approximately 

19 0.482 acres, commonly known as Wireless Sta20 tion located on Manor Avenue in Government 

21 Hill. 

22 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

23 the Secretary of the Interior. 

24 (b) CONVEYANCE OF REVERSIONARY INTERESTS, 

25 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA.— 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6475 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other 

2 provision of law, the Secretary shall convey to the 

3 City, without consideration, the reversionary inter4 ests of the United States in and to the non-Federal 

5 land for the purpose of unencumbering the title to 

6 the non-Federal land to enable economic develop7 ment of the non-Federal land. 

8 (2) LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS.—As soon as prac9 ticable after the date of enactment of this Act, the 

10 exact legal descriptions of the non-Federal land shall 

11 be determined in a manner satisfactory to the Sec12 retary. 

13 (3) COSTS.—The City shall pay all costs associ14 ated with the conveyance under paragraph (1), in15 cluding the costs of any surveys, recording costs, 

16 and other reasonable costs. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                              35
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      706
<ALLOWANCES>                                       436
<INVENTORY>                                      1,217
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,626
<PP&E>                                           2,812
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,479
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,026
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,378
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                        (463)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,026
<SALES>                                             81
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    81
<CGS>                                               20
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,616
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 288
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,776)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,776)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      73
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,703)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.39)



</TABLE>
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 293

Saluting the service of Howard O. Greene, Jr., to the United States Senate.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 17, 1996

Mr. LOTT (for himself, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. BYRD, Mr. WARNER, Mr. SIMPSON, Mrs. KASSEBAUM, Mr. FORD, Mr. ROCKEFELLER,

Mr. LEVIN, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. COVERDELL, and Mr. FRIST) submitted

the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Saluting the service of Howard O. Greene, Jr., to the United

States Senate.

Whereas Howard O. Greene, Jr., has served the United

States Senate since January 1968;

Whereas Mr. Greene has during his Senate career served in

the capacities of Doorkeeper, Republican cloakroom assistant, assistant secretary for the minority, secretary for

the minority, secretary for the majority, culminating in

his election as Senate Sergeant at Arms during the 104th

Congress;

Whereas throughout his Senate career Mr. Greene has been

a reliable source of advice and counsel to Senators and

Senate staff alike;
2

SRES 293 ATS

Whereas Mr. Greene’s institutional knowledge and legislative

skills are well-known and respected; and

Whereas Mr. Greene’s more than 28 years of service have

been characterized by a deep and abiding respect for the

institution and customs of the United States Senate:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate salutes Howard O. Greene,

2 Jr., for his career of public service to the United States

3 Senate and its Members.

4 SEC. 2. The Secretary of the Senate shall transmit

5 a copy of this resolution to Howard O. Greene, Jr.

Æ
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

AUG5 m OfFICE OF

WAT ER

Dear Honorable Leaders:

I ampleased to inform you that EPA is starti ng to develop a proposed rulemaking

relating to water quality standards that may be of interest to you.

You may he interested in this rulemaking if (a) your tribe is one ofthe 45 tribes

that are eligible to be treated in a manner similar to a state (TAS) for the purpose of

administering water quality standards under the Clean Water Act, (b) if your tribe has

submitted an application for TAS, (c) if your tribe is developing wate r quality standards,

or (d) if you have encountered issues relating to standards of other jurisdictions.

The rulemaking would propose a limited set of targeted changes to the water

quality standards regulation to improve its effectiveness in helping restore and maintain

the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the nation 's waters. These would be

primarily technical changes to the regulation. The regulation, which has been in place

since 1983, governs how states and authorized tribes ado pt standards needed under the

Clean Water Act to protect the quality of their rivers, streams, lakes, and estuaries. EPA

expects to publish a proposed rule in the Federal Register in summer 20 11.

Since this rulemaking may affect tribal water quality standards programs under

the Clean Water Act, we believe it is important to conduct a consultation process with

tribes. We want to have the full benefit oftribal views on the changes we are

contemplating. Therefore, I cordially invite you or your water qualitv program staff

members to participate in the following national teleconference:

Tribes-only Session: "Water Quality Standards Regulatory Changes"

August 19, 2010

4:00 - 5:30 pm EDT

Telecouference phone numher: (888) 689-4723

Conference ID: 90716957

I am enclosing a fact sheet about the consultation. The fact sheet also contains

instructions for participating in the teleconference. We are not inviting states, local

governments, or the gene ral public to the tribal-only session above. They will have other

opportunities to provide views to EPA. The fact sheet desc ribes teleconferences that will

be held for the publi c on August 24 and 26, 2010. EPA will present the same information

in both the tribes-only session and the public sessions. Tribes may also participate in the

public teleconfere nces as well.

Internet Address (URLj • hltpJIwww.epa.gov

Recye ledlRecyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Poslconsumer, Process Chlorir\BFree Recycled Paper
If you have any questions, please contact Evelyn Washington, Acting Director of

the Standards and Health Protection Division in the Office Water, at (202) 566-0591, or

Fred Leutner, Senior Advisor for Water Quality Standards at (202) 566-0378.

Wann Regards,

9h~k7 Ephraim S. King

Director

Office ofScience and Technology

Enclosure
(logo) TORCHLIGHT

LOAN SERVICES

 

 

**ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

**COMM 2014-UBS5 MortgageTrust (the “Trust”)**

 

I, Jacob Baron, on behalf ofTorchlight Loan Services, LLC, as special servicer for the Harwood CenterMortgage Loan (the “Certifying Servicer”), certify to DeutscheMortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, the Depositor, each Other Depositorand their respective officers, directors and affiliates, and with the knowledgeand intent that they will rely upon this certification, that:

 

1. I (or Servicing Officersunder my supervision) have reviewed the Certifying Servicer’s activitiesduring that portion of the year from November 1 to December 31, 2016 (the“Reporting Period”) that it served as Special Servicer for theHarwood Center Mortgage Loan and the Certifying Servicer’s performanceunder the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all ofits obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all materialrespects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Date: March 17, 2017

 

TORCHLIGHT LOAN SERVICES, LLC

 

By: /s/ Jacob Baron

Name: Jacob Baron

Title: Authorized Signatory

 

 

475 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY10017

T 212.883.2800 F 212.883.2560

E info@torchlightloanservices.com

www.torchlightinvestors.com
NARUC- FERC 

Joint Forum Reliability and the Environment 

Clean Water Act Section 316(b)

California’s Once-Through-Cooling Policy

Karen Edson

Vice President, Policy and Client Services

February 5, 2013
2

ISO local 

capacity

areas and oncethrough-cooling plants

Caveat

LA Basin number includes 2,246 MW 

of capacity at the San Onofre

Nuclear Generating Station currently 

subject to an extended outage.
Los Angeles Basin and San Diego local capacity areas

3

Caveat

The San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station is currently 

subject to an extended outage.

Map does not reflect 2,200 MW of OTC capacity in LADWP’s 

balancing authority area.
4

Growing need for flexibility starts in 2015
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 322 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 322

     To commend the exemplary leadership of the Democratic leader.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 3, 1996

 Mr. Thurmond submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     To commend the exemplary leadership of the Democratic leader.

    Resolved, That the thanks of the Senate are hereby tendered to the 
distinguished Democratic leader, the Senator from South Dakota, the 
Honorable Thomas A. Daschle, for his exemplary leadership and the 
cooperative and dedicated manner in which he has performed his 
leadership responsibilities in the conduct of Senate business during 
the second session of the 104th Congress.
                                 <all>
```
#### H. Kenneth LEFOLDT, Jr., in his capacity as Trustee for the Natchez Regional Medical Center Liquidation Trust, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Donald RENTFRO; Charles Mock; William Heburn; Leroy White; John Serafin; Linda Godley; Lionel Stepter; Lee Martin; William Ernst; Jennifer Russ, Defendants-Appellees

No. 16-60491

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed January 16, 2018

Brent Bennett Barriere, Alysson Leigh Mills, Esq., Degan Skylar Rosenbloom, Esq., Rebecca Sha, Fishman Haygood, L.L.P., New Orleans, LA, Douglas Scott Draper, Esq., Heller, Draper, Patrick, Horn *&*Dabney, L.L.C., New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellant

Michael Franklin Myers, Esq., Currie, Johnson *&*Myers, P.A., Jackson, MS, for Defendants-Appellees Donald Rentfro, Charles Mock, William Heburn

Roy Allen Smith, Jr., Esq., Steven James Griffin, Esq., Daniel, Coker, Horton *&*Bell, P.A., Jackson, MS, for Defendants-Appellees Leroy White, John Serafín, Linda Godley, Lionel Stepter, Lee Martin, William Ernst, Jennifer Russ

*292Before JONES and OWEN, Circuit Judges, and ENGELHARDT,* District Judge.

*

 Chief District Judge of the Eastern District of Louisiana, sitting by designation

PER CURIAM: **

Natchez Regional Medical Center (“NRMC”) filed for bankruptcy and H. Kenneth Lefoldt was appointed Trustee for the liquidation trust. As Trustee, Le-foldt brought claims against the former directors and officers of NRMC, alleging breaches of their fiduciary duties of care, loyalty, and good faith. The district court held that the defendants were immune from suit under the Mississippi Tort Claims Act (“MTCA”). We certified this legal issue to the Mississippi Supreme Court, which held that the MTCA does not “provide[ ] the exclusive remedy for a public hospital’s bankruptcy trustee who, on behalf of the public hospital, sued former officers and directors of that public hospital.” In light of this controlling decision, we vacate the district court’s order dismissing the case and remand for further proceedings.

VACATED and REMANDED.

**

 pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2014-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
  2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
  4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and


5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.






By:  /s/ Ritu Chandy