alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) CWCapital

ASSET MANAGEMENT

  |
|--------------------------------------------|

 

 

Annual Statement as to Compliance

For the Period of January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014

 

 

 

WFRBS 2014-C22  

 

 

                

In accordance with Item 1123 of Regulation AB andwith the requirements detailed in §11.12 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) for the above-mentioned CMBS pool, (the “CMBS Pool”), CWCapital Asset Management LLC (“CWCAM”), in its capacity as Special Servicer, is providing this Officer’s Certificate with respect to the following:

 

(A)          a review of CWCAM’s activities during the preceding calendar year or portion thereof (the “Reporting Period”) and of CWCAM’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and;

 

(B)           to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, CWCAM has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.  

 

Sincerely,

CWCapital Asset Management LLC

 

 

/s/  David B. Iannarone

David B. Iannarone

President

 

 

7501 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 500 West, Bethesda, MD  20814

www.cwcapital.com
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00075-CR

CLYDELL MARIE OLANIPEKUN,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 297th District Court

of Tarrant County (1380032D)

March 12, 2020

Opinion by Justice Womack

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in the trial court’s judgment. We modify the “Plea to Motion to 

Adjudicate:” portion of the trial court’s judgment by deleting the phrase “Paragraph 

Three-True” and affirm the judgment as modified. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed as modified.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dana Womack

 Justice Dana Womack
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
  CERTIFICATION
    PURSUANT TO
    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
    SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    1.
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on
    Form 10-Q
    of Loral Space & Communications Inc.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
    statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
    necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
    circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
    financial information included in this report, fairly present in
    all material respects the financial condition, results of
    operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
    periods presented in this report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
    Rules 13a-15(e)
    and
    15d-15(e))
    and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
    Exchange Act
    Rules 13a-15(f)
    and
    15d-15(f))
    for the registrant and have:          5.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have
    disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
    control over financial reporting, to the registrants
    auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board
    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):      Michael
    B. Targoff
Helen Arlene Owen, 

Individually and on Behalf of 

All Wrongful Death 

Beneficiaries of Lily Mines, 

Deceased; s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 3, 2015

No. 04-15-00561-CV

SPECIALTY SELECT CARE CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO, L.L.C. d/b/a Casa Rio 

Healthcare and Rehabilitation,

Appellant

v.

Helen Arlene OWEN, Individually and on Behalf of All Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Lily 

Mines, Deceased; Helen Bomar, as Wrongful Death Beneficiary and on Behalf of the Estate of 

Frank Bomar, Deceased; Trinidad Virginia Luna Rangel and Ted Richard Luna,,

Appellees

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-13633

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding

ORDER

 This is an accelerated appeal. Appellees’ brief is currently due November 16, 2015.

On October 30, 2015, appellees filed an unopposed motion for extension of time, asking this 

court to extend the due date for appellees’ brief to January 5, 2016. In support of their request, 

appellees assert that the parties are scheduled for mediation on December 15, 2015. The parties 

hope to settle the underlying dispute through the mediation process. After reviewing appellees’ 

motion, we GRANT appellees’ motion for an extension of time and ORDER appellee’s to file 

their brief on or before January 5, 2016. If the parties are able to settle the underlying dispute at 

mediation, we ORDER appellant and appellees to notify this court in writing of the settlement as 

soon as possible.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3rd day of November, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.26


SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
OF
AMERIGAS PROPANE, INC.
(the General Partner of AmeriGas Partners, L.P.)


The table below shows the components of director compensation effective October 1, 2017.  A director who is an officer or employee of the Registrant or its subsidiaries is not compensated for service on the Board of Directors or on any Committee of the Board.  




CASH        EQUITY
COMPONENT        COMPONENT  


Annual Retainer                $75,000        1,400 Phantom Units
(Representing AmeriGas 
Partners, L.P. Common Units
to be awarded in 
January 2017).
                                                            
Additional Annual Retainer for         $10,000
Audit Committee Members
(other than the Chairperson)            


Additional Annual Retainer for         $15,000
the Audit Committee Chairperson        


Additional Annual Retainer for         $7,500
the Corporate Governance
Committee Chairperson        


Additional Annual Retainer for         $7,500
the Compensation/Pension Committee 
Chairperson    


Additional Annual Retainer for         $15,000
Presiding Director
**Exhibit 32.2****Certification of Chief Financial Officer**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created bySection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Party City Corporation (the“Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’sknowledge, that:          (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company    for the quarterly period ended October 1, 2005 (the    “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and           (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Gregg A. Melnick           Gregg A. Melnick *Chief Financial Officer*Dated: November 10, 2005     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely toaccompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, and is not being filed for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in suchfiling.
Annual Statement asto Compliance

For the Year EndedDecember 31, 2022 (the “Reporting Period”)

** **

*Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation,*

*COMM Series 2014-UBS6*

 

 

Pursuantto Section 3.06(f) of the Amended and Restated Subservicing Agreement governingthe referenced transaction (the “Servicing Agreement”), I hereby attest that:

 

i.                    Areview of the activities and performance of Berkadia as Subservicer during theReporting Period has been made under my supervision.

 

ii.                  To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, Berkadia as Subservicer hasfulfilled, in all material respects, its obligations under this ServicingAgreement throughout the Reporting Period and no default by the Subservicerunder the Servicing Agreement has occurred and is continuing.

 

Berkadia, 

  

/s/Mark E. McCool 

MarkE. McCool

President

### February 10, 2023
#### Steven WIERZBA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jill N. JAFFE; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-15325

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted November 15, 2017 *

Filed November 28, 2017

Steven Wierzba, Pro Se

Kevin P. Cody, Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley, PC, San Jose, CA, for Defendants-Appellees Jill N. Jaffe, Adam G. Wong

Melissa Robbins Coutts, Esquire, Attorney, McCarthy & Holthus LLP, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellee Quality Loan Service Corporation

David Gonden, Esquire, Attorney, Trombadore Gonden Law Group LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellee Black Knight Financial Services Inc.

Bryant S. Delgadillo, Parker Ibrahim *&*Berg LLC, Costa Mesa, CA, for Defendant-Appellee JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Thomas P. Sullivan, Esquire, Brown & Sullivan, LLP, Alameda, CA, for Defendant-Appellee Clement Holdings, LLC

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Steven Wierzba appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action alleging various federal and state law foreclosure related claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal on the basis of res judicata. *Manufactured Home Cmtys. Inc. v. City of San Jose,*420 F.3d 1022, 1025 (9th Cir. 2005). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Wierzba’s action as barred by the doctrine of res judicata because his claims were raised, or could have been raised, in his two prior federal court actions and the state court unlawful detainer action that resulted in final judgments. *See Stewart v. U.S. Bancorp,*297 F.3d 953, 956 (9th Cir. 2002) (factors for applying federal rule for res judicata); *Vella v. Hudgins,*20 Cal.3d 251, 142 Cal.Rptr. 414, 572 P.2d 28, 30 (1977) (unlawful detainer judgments have claim preclusive effect on subsequent actions challenging validity of title); *see also*Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 1161a(b)(3) (unlawful detainer action permitted where property was acquired through a sale made in accordance with Section 2924 of the California Civil Code).

We reject as meritless Wierzba’s contentions regarding defendant Quality Loan Service Corporation’s alleged default.

We do not consider arguments not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Cyberspace Vita, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:  The amended annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Amended Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: January 9, 2013  /s/ Geoffrey Alison  Geoffrey Alison Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CYBERSPACE VITA, INC. and will be retained by CYBERSPACE VITA, INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2023054EN.01002101.xml

| 13.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 54/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/21

---

Action brought on 21 December 2022 — Drinks Prod/EUIPO — Coolike-Regnery (VIVIASEPT)

(Case T-796/22)

(2023/C 54/24)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Drinks Prod Srl (Păntășești, Romania) (represented by: I. Speciac and V. Stănese, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Coolike-Regnery GmbH (Bensheim, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark VIVIASEPT — Application for registration No 18 329 344

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 September 2022 in Case R 488/2022-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | oblige EUIPO to continue the registration proceedings for EUTM No. 18 329 344 (‘VIVIASEPT’) for all the requested goods and services from Classes 3 and 5. |
| --- | --- |

—

oblige EUIPO to continue the registration proceedings for EUTM No. 18 329 344 (‘VIVIASEPT’) for all the requested goods and services from Classes 3 and 5.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Exhibit 31.1




Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function


of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)









CERTIFICATION






I, Mark Kaczynski, certify that:


1.           I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Lease Trust 2014-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
  2.           Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.           Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
  4.           I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement, in all material respects; and
  5.           All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
  In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party:  U.S. Bank National Association.
  Date:                      June 15, 2016


By:/s/ Mark Kaczynski


Mark Kaczynski


President and Chief Executive Officer of


Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation


(senior officer in charge of the


servicing function)
**EXHIBIT32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned, Sterling H. McDonald, Chief FinancialOfficer of Evolution Petroleum Corporation (the “Company”), certifies inconnection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of theCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007(the “Report”) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed thiscertification as of the 15th day of May, 2007.
|        | /s/ STERLING H. MCDONALD |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Sterling H. McDonald     |
|   | Chief Financial Officer  |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Evolution Petroleum Corporation and will beretained by Evolution Petroleum Corporation and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certificate is being furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission as an exhibit to this Form 10-QSB and shall not beconsidered filed as part of the Form 10-QSB.

1

----
### RE: Meeting tomorrow on NO2 monitoring King, Heidi R. to: Lydia Wegman 01/19/2010 10:09 AM Cc: Richard Wayland, Nealson Watkins, Scott Jenkins, Karen Martin, Tricia Crabtree

I'm on another call, but available at 10:30. Would that work? -----Original Message----- From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Monday, January 18, 2010 12:17 PM To: King, Heidi R. Cc: Wayland.Richard@epamail.epa.gov; Nealson Watkins; Scott Jenkins; Karen Martin; Tricia Crabtree Subject: Meeting tomorrow on NO2 monitoring
Heidi, I hope you're feeling better and are having a good weekend. Following the management discussion today, we'd like to meet with you tomorrow, rather than wait until Wednesday, to discuss the issue of how many near-road monitors we will require in the NO2 rule. Do you have time to talk tomorrow after 10 AM? Please let me know. Lydia
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Lynn SMIRL, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-10260 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 20, 2017

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Lynn Smirl, Pro Se

Before JONES, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges,

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent' Lynn Smirl has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Smirl has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Smiri’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no non-frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2. Smiri’s motion for appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under *253the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>             5
<LEGEND>
 This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
 unaudited balance sheet of Lucent at June 30, 1998 and the unaudited
 consolidated statement of income for the nine month period ended June 30, 1998
 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements. The
 financial data schedule reflects the two-for-one split of Lucent's common stock
 which became effective on April 1, 1998.

 </LEGEND>
        
 <S>                             <C>
 <PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
 <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   SEP-30-1998
 <PERIOD-START>                      OCT-1-1997
 <PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-1998
 <CASH>                                    1,099
 <SECURITIES>                                  0
 <RECEIVABLES>                             6,166
 <ALLOWANCES>                                374
 <INVENTORY>                               2,973
 <CURRENT-ASSETS>                         13,305
 <PP&E>                                   11,210
 <DEPRECIATION>                            6,253
 <TOTAL-ASSETS>                           25,279
 <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    10,196
 <BONDS>                                   1,899
 <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
 <PREFERRED>                                   0
 <COMMON>                                     13
 <OTHER-SE>                                4,909
 <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             25,279
 <SALES>                                  22,109
 <TOTAL-REVENUES>                         22,109
 <CGS>                                    11,901
 <TOTAL-COSTS>                            11,901
 <OTHER-EXPENSES>                          8,565
 <LOSS-PROVISION>                            105
 <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          232
 <INCOME-PRETAX>                           1,614
 <INCOME-TAX>                              1,032
 <INCOME-CONTINUING>                         582
 <DISCONTINUED>                                0
 <EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
 <CHANGES>                                     0
 <NET-INCOME>                                582
 <EPS-PRIMARY>                              0.45
 <EPS-DILUTED>                              0.44
         
 
</TABLE>
FAA- 2011 - 0573 From Virgin America: Dated 07/07/11 Hello Sanjay, We have reviewed AD2011 - 13 - 11 in detail, and have a question on paragraph (m), requiring a "new" part to be installed if the repetive inspection requires replacement of the actuator. Does this indeed mean "newly manufactured"? I couldn't find this requirement in either the EASA AD nor the Airbus AOT. I tried to see if the economic analysis would have this information, but only the federal register is loaded on the regulations.gov website, under Docket No. FAA - 2011 - 0573. Best Regards, Krista Dial Manager, Maintenance Programs and Reliability 555 Airport Blvd. Burlingame, CA 94010 650 - 762 - 7168 phone 650 - 648 - 0537 fax