Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2022 / Notices 16495 

1The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

is responsible for notifying The Tribes 

that this notice has been published. 

Dated: March 17, 2022. 

Melanie O’Brien, 

Manager, National NAGPRA Program. 

[FR Doc. 2022–06129 Filed 3–22–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–52–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–539 and 731– 

TA–1280–1282 (Review)] 

Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded 

Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From 

Korea, Mexico, and Turkey 

Determination 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject five-year reviews, the 

United States International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) 

determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 

1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the 

countervailing duty order on heavy 

walled rectangular welded carbon steel 

pipes and tubes from Turkey and the 

antidumping duty orders on heavy 

walled rectangular welded carbon steel 

pipes and tubes from Korea, Mexico, 

and Turkey would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States within a reasonably foreseeable 

time. 

Background 

The Commission instituted these 

reviews on August 2, 2021 (86 FR 

41511) and determined on November 5, 

2021 that it would conduct expedited 

reviews (87 FR 7498, February 9, 2022). 

The Commission made these 

determinations pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It 

completed and filed its determinations 

in these reviews on March 17, 2022. The 

views of the Commission are contained 

in USITC Publication 5297 (March 

2022), entitled Heavy Walled 

Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes 

and Tubes from Korea, Mexico, and 

Turkey: Investigation Nos. 701–TA–539 

and 731–TA–1280–1282 (Review). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: March 17, 2022. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2022–06123 Filed 3–22–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1230] 

Certain Electric Shavers and 

Components and Accessories Thereof 

Commission Decision Finding a 

Violation of Section 337; Issuing a 

General Exclusion Order and Cease 

and Desist Orders; Terminating the 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) has 

determined to affirm the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’s’’) 

initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 

33) finding a violation of section 337 of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, in 

this investigation and has issued a 

general exclusion order and cease and 

desist orders prohibiting the 

importation of certain electric shavers 

and components and accessories 

thereof. The investigation is hereby 

terminated. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–2532. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal, telephone 

(202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

November 18, 2020, the Commission 

instituted this investigation based on a 

complaint filed by Complainant Skull 

Shaver (‘‘Skull Shaver’’) of Moorestown, 

New Jersey. 85 FR 73510–11 (Nov. 18, 

2020). The complaint alleged violations 

of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based on 

the importation into the United States, 

the sale for importation, or the sale 

within the United States after 

importation of certain electric shavers 

and components and accessories thereof 

by reason of infringement of certain 

claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,726,528 

(‘‘the ’528 patent’’) and D672,504 (‘‘the 

’504 design patent’’). Id. The 

Commission’s notice of investigation 

named the following eleven entities as 

respondents: Rayenbarny Inc. 

(‘‘Rayenbarny’’) of New York, New 

York; Bald Shaver Inc. (‘‘Bald Shaver’’) 

of Toronto, Canada; Suzhou Kaidiya 

Garments Trading Co., Ltd. (‘‘Suzhou’’) 

d.b.a. ‘‘Digimator’’ of Suzhou, China; 

Shenzhen Aiweilai Trading Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Aiweilei’’) d.b.a. ‘‘Teamyo’’ of 

Shenzhen, China; Wenzhou Wending 

Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. of Yueqing 

City, China; Shenzhen Nukun 

Technology Co., Ltd. (‘‘Nukun’’) d.b.a. 

‘‘OriHea’’ of Shenzhen, China; Yiwu 

Xingye Network Technology Co. Ltd. 

(‘‘Yiwu Xingye’’) d.b.a. ‘‘Roziapro’’ of 

Yiwu, China; Magicfly LLC (‘‘Magicfly’’) 

of Hong Kong; Yiwu City Qiaoyu 

Trading Co., Ltd. (‘‘Yiwu City’’) of 

Yiwu, China; Shenzhen Wantong 

Information Technology Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Wantong’’) d.b.a. ‘‘WTONG’’ of 

Shenzhen, China; and Shenzhen 

Junmao International Technology Co., 

Ltd. (‘‘Junmao’’) d.b.a. ‘‘Homeas’’ of 

Shenzhen, China. The notice of 

investigation also named the Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) as 

a party. Id. 

The Commission terminated 

Rayenbarny from the investigation 

because its accused product was 

actually imported by Benepuri LLC 

(‘‘Benepuri’’) of Menands, New York; 

the Commission allowed Benepuri to 

intervene as a respondent. Notice, 85 FR 

82514, 82515 (Dec. 18, 2020). The 

Commission later granted Skull Shaver’s 

motion to amend the Complaint and the 

notice of investigation to correct the 

name of Wenzhou Wending Electric 

Appliance Co., Ltd. d.b.a. ‘‘Paitree’’ as 

Wenzhou Wending Electric Appliance 

Co., Ltd. (‘‘Wenzhou’’), and to correct 

the addresses of several respondents. 

Notice, 86 FR 14645, 14645 (Mar. 17, 

2021). The Commission terminated 

Magicfly from the investigation on the 

basis of settlement. Notice at 2 (May 19, 

2021). The Commission terminated 

Nukun and Benepuri from the 

investigation on the basis of withdrawal 

of the complaint. Notice at 2 (June 21, 

2021) (Nukun); Notice at 2 (Oct. 28, 

2021) (Benepuri). All of the remaining 

respondents (i.e., all respondents other 

than Magicfly, Nukun, Benepuri and 

Rayenbarny) defaulted. See Notice at 3 

(May 21, 2021) (seven defaulting 

respondents); Notice at 2 (Dec. 9, 2021) 

(Bald Shaver defaulting). Taken 

together, the eight defaulting 

respondents are: Suzhou; Yiwu City; 

Wenzhou; Aiweilai; Junmao; Wantong; 

Yiwu Xingye; and Bald Shaver. 

On May 26, 2021, Skull Shaver filed 

a motion for summary determination of 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
16496 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2022 / Notices 

violation of section 337 by the eight 

defaulting respondents and for a 

recommendation that the Commission 

issue a general exclusion order (‘‘GEO’’) 

and cease and desist orders (‘‘CDOs’’). 

See Complainants’ Motion for Summary 

Determination of Violation and for 

Recommended Determination on 

Remedy and Bonding. Skull Shaver 

accused Yiwu Xingye and Yiwu City of 

infringing claims 1–3 of the ’528 patent 

and the claim of the ’504 design patent. 

Id. at 5. It accused the other respondents 

of infringing only claim 1 of the ’528 

patent. Id. On June 7, 2021, OUII filed 

a response in support of Skull Shaver’s 

motion. See Commission Investigative 

Staff’s Response to Skull Shaver’s 

Motion for Summary Determination of 

Violation. No respondent filed a 

response to Skull Shaver’s motion. 

On September 23, 2021, OUII filed a 

notice of supplemental authority 

concerning the domestic industry 

requirement. On September 28, 2021, 

the ALJ issued an order (Order No. 31) 

ordering certain supplementation of 

Skull Shaver’s domestic industry 

analysis. On October 14, 2021, Skull 

Shaver submitted its supplement in 

response to Order No. 31. No other 

responses to Order No. 31 were filed. 

On November 18, 2021, the ALJ grantedin-part Skull Shaver’s motion for 

summary determination as the subject 

ID. 

The ID found that Skull Shaver owns 

the asserted patents, and that those 

patents are valid and enforceable. ID at 

3. The ID further found that although all 

respondents imported, sold for 

importation, or sold within the United 

States after importation at least one 

accused article, the only respondents 

whose articles infringe the asserted 

patents are Yiwu Xingye and Yiwu City. 

Id. at 3–4. The ID found no infringement 

as to the other respondents, whose 

products lack a second recess, see ID at 

51–52, in view of the ALJ’s construction 

of ‘‘recesses’’ as ‘‘indentations that are 

substantially concave surfaces,’’ id. at 

16 (citation omitted), and Skull Shaver’s 

forfeiture of an infringement theory 

under the doctrine of equivalents, id. at 

50 n.7. The ID found that personal 

jurisdiction is not necessary over each 

defaulting respondent, but that the 

defaulting respondents waived any 

opportunity to contest the allegation 

that personal jurisdiction exists. Id. The 

ID further found that Skull Shaver meets 

the technical prong and the economic 

prong of the domestic industry 

requirement. Id. at 4. As to remedy, the 

RD found that there is a widespread 

pattern of unauthorized use of the 

asserted patents and it is difficult to 

identify the source of these products; 

and that a GEO is necessary to prevent 

circumvention. Id. at 4. The RD also 

recommended issuance of CDOs against 

the two infringing respondents, who are 

presumed to maintain domestic 

inventories. RD at 80–81. The RD 

recommended a bond rate of one 

hundred percent (100%) because 

complete pricing information is not 

available. RD at 82. 

No petitions for review of the ID were 

filed. The Commission determined to 

review the ID’s findings concerning the 

economic prong of the domestic 

industry requirement, and not to review 

the ID’s findings on other issues. Notice, 

87 FR 990, 991 (Jan. 7, 2022). The 

review notice solicited written 

submissions, including on remedy, the 

public interest, and bonding from the 

parties, interested government agencies, 

and the public. Id. 

In response to the Commission notice, 

Skull Shaver and OUII each filed an 

opening submission and a reply. No 

other parties filed submissions. 

On review, the Commission has 

determined to affirm the ID’s finding 

that Skull Shaver has satisfied the 

economic prong of the domestic 

industry requirement, and the 

Commission thereby affirms the ID’s 

finding of a violation of section 337. 

The Commission finds that the RD’s 

recommended remedy is appropriate for 

the reasons set forth in the attached 

opinion. Accordingly, the Commission 

finds that the appropriate remedy is: (1) 

A general exclusion order prohibiting 

the entry of certain electric shavers and 

components and accessories thereof; 

and (2) cease and desist orders directed 

to Yiwu Xingye and Yiwu City. The 

Commission has determined that the 

public interest factors enumerated in 

section 337(d), (f), and/or (g), 19 U.S.C. 

1337(d), (f), (g), do not preclude the 

issuance of the GEO or the CDOs. 

The Commission has determined that 

a bond in the amount of one hundred 

percent (100%) of the entered value of 

the subject articles is required during 

the Presidential review period, 19 

U.S.C. 1337(j) for the reasons set forth 

in the RD and the attached Commission 

Opinion. The investigation is hereby 

terminated. 

While temporary remote operating 

procedures are in place in response to 

COVID–19, the Office of the Secretary is 

not able to serve parties that have not 

retained counsel or otherwise provided 

a point of contact for electronic service. 

Accordingly, pursuant to Commission 

Rules 201.16(a) and 210.7(a)(1) (19 CFR 

201.16(a), 210.7(a)(1)), the Commission 

orders that the Complainant complete 

service for any party without a method 

of electronic service noted on the 

attached Certificate of Service and shall 

file proof of service on the Electronic 

Document Information System (EDIS). 

The Commission’s orders and opinion 

were delivered to the President and the 

United States Trade Representative on 

the day of their issuance. 

The Commission vote for these 

determinations took place on March 17, 

2022. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: March 17, 2022. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2022–06122 Filed 3–22–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Drug Enforcement Administration 

[Docket No. DEA–985] 

Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled 

Substances Application: Johnson 

Matthey Pharmaceutical Materials, Inc. 

AGENCY: Drug Enforcement 

Administration, Justice. 

ACTION: Notice of application. 

SUMMARY: Johnson Matthey 

Pharmaceutical Materials, Inc., has 

applied to be registered as a bulk 

manufacturer of basic class(es) of 

controlled substance(s). Refer to 

Supplementary Information listed below 

for further drug information. 

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of 

the affected basic class(es), and 

applicants therefore, may submit 

electronic comments on or objections to 

the issuance of the proposed registration 

on or before May 23, 2022. Such persons 

may also file a written request for a 

hearing on the application on or before 

May 23, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: The Drug Enforcement 

Administration requires that all 

comments be submitted electronically 

through the Federal eRulemaking Portal, 

which provides the ability to type short 

comments directly into the comment 

field on the web page or attach a file for 

lengthier comments. Please go to 

https://www.regulations.gov and follow 

the online instructions at that site for 

submitting comments. Upon submission 

of your comment, you will receive a 

Comment Tracking Number. Please be 

aware that submitted comments are not 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1