alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
VILLAGEWORLD.COM
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  VillageWorld.Com,  (the "Small
Business  Issuer")  on  Form  10-QSB  for  the three-month and six-month periods
ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date  hereof  (the  "Report"), I, Celia I. Schiffner, Chief Financial Officer of
VillageWorld.Com, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
     1)           The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Small Business Issuer.

/s/  Celia  I.  Schiffner

Celia  I.  Schiffner
Chief  Financial  Officer
August  15,  2002


<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.2














CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the "Report") for the period ended March 31, 2011 of Dime Community Bancshares, Inc., (the "Company") as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Kenneth J. Mahon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









May 10, 2011


Date









By:  /s/ KENNETH J. MAHON


Kenneth J. Mahon


First Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 139

Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States Government should

fully participate in EXPO 2000 in the year 2000, in Hannover, Germany,

and should encourage the academic community and the private sector

in the United States to support this worthwhile undertaking.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 31, 1997

Mr. BEREUTER (for himself, Mr. OXLEY, Mr. PICKETT, and Mr. HAMILTON)

submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States

Government should fully participate in EXPO 2000 in

the year 2000, in Hannover, Germany, and should encourage the academic community and the private sector

in the United States to support this worthwhile undertaking.

Whereas Germany has invited nations, international and nongovernmental organizations, and individuals from around

the world to participate in EXPO 2000, a global town

hall meeting to be hosted in the year 2000, in Hannover,

Germany, for the purpose providing a forum for worldwide dialogue on the challenges, goals, and solutions for
2

•HCON 139 IH

the sustainable development of mankind in the 21st century;

Whereas the theme of EXPO 2000 is ‘‘Humankind-NatureTechnology’’;

Whereas EXPO 2000 will take place in the heart of the

newly unified, free, and democratic Europe;

Whereas Germany has established a stable democracy and a

pluralistic society in the heart of Europe;

Whereas more than 40,000,000 people in the United States

can trace their ancestry to Germany, and in 1983 the

United States and Germany celebrated the Tri-Centennial of immigration of Germans into the United States;

Whereas Germany has been a close political and military ally

of the United States for nearly five decades and has been

a driving force with respect to the political, monetary,

and economic integration of Europe;

Whereas the United States, as a leading political, intellectual,

and economic power, maintains a strong interest in the

worldwide strengthening of political freedom and human

rights, open market economies, and technological advancement throughout the world; and

Whereas the United States is eager to share with the global

community the vast and promising public and private efforts being made to prepare for the next century: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that the

3 United States Government—
3

•HCON 139 IH

1 (1) should fully participate in EXPO 2000, a

2 global town hall meeting to be hosted in the year

3 2000, in Hannover, Germany, for the purpose of

4 providing a forum for worldwide dialogue on the

5 challenges, goals, and solutions for the sustainable

6 development of mankind in the 21st century; and

7 (2) should encourage the academic community

8 and the private sector in the United States to sup9 port this worthwhile undertaking.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Hong Tan, the Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of Golden Elephant Glass Technology, Inc. (the Company), DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY that:

1.    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2009 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 14th day of August 2009.

/s/ Hong TanHong Tan 
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Golden Elephant Glass Technology, Inc. and will be retained by Golden Elephant Glass Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 11687]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the exhibition “Philip Guston Now” at the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, in Boston, Massachusetts; the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, in Houston, Texas; the National Gallery of Art, Washington, District of Columbia; and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State,L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Stacy E. White,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2022-06153 Filed 3-22-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Exhibit 10.1


 


JOINT FILING AGREEMENT


 


We, the signatories of the statement to
which this Joint Filing Agreement is attached, hereby agree that such statement is filed, and any amendments thereto filed by any
or all of us will be filed on behalf of each of us.


 


	Dated: December 6, 2017. 	 /s/ Glenn Sanford
	 	Signature 
	 	Glenn Sanford 
	 	 
	Dated: December 6, 2017. 	/s/ Penny Sanford
	 	Signature 
	 	Penny Sanford
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00322

- CR

Erik White

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 371st District Court

o f Tarrant County (13 30414 D )

July 30, 2015

Opinion by Justice Charles Bleil

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Charles Bleil

Justice Charles Ble il
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|                                         |                                                                                                                                                                                    |                                  |
|----------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
| Date:                 November 14, 2006 | **HOMELAND                SECURITY CAPITAL CORPORATION**                                                                                                                                |
|                                    |                                                                                                                                                                               |                             |
|                                         | By:                                                                                                                                                                           | */s/              C. Thomas McMillen* |
|                                         | Name:                C. Thomas McMillen                                                                                                                                                 |
|                                         | Title: President,                Chief Executive Officer, Principal                Accounting Officer  and                Interim                Chief Financial Officer |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 9 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 9

  Notifying the President of the United States of the election of the 
                        Secretary of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Dole submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Notifying the President of the United States of the election of the 
                        Secretary of the Senate.

    Resolved, That the President of the United States be notified of 
the election of the Honorable Sheila P. Burke, of California, as 
Secretary of the Senate.
                                 <all>
```
(logo)  LNRPartners, LLC  **ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**** ****OF**** ****LNR PARTNERS, LLC**  The undersigned, Job Warshaw, being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the "Special Servicer"), as special servicer under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule I hereto, hereby certifies, subject to any limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an authorized officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows: 1. A review of the activities performed by the Special Servicer during the period commencing on January 1, 2015 and ending on December 31, 2015 (or any other shorter period set forth on Schedule I hereto) (the “Reporting Period"), and of the Special Servicer's performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and 2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicing criteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.  LNR PARTNERS, LLC,a Florida limited liability companyBy: /s/ Job WarshawJob WarshawPresident  Dated: February 23, 2016  1601 Washington Avenue · Suite 700 · Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164Telephone: (305) 695-5600 · Fax: (305) 695-5601  **Schedule I**  JPMBB 2014-C24JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2014 C24, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-C24  Fitch Ratings Inc.33 Whitehall StreetAttention: Commercial Mortgaged SurveillanceNew York NY 10004General ContactJ.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp. 383 Madison Avenue, 32nd FloorNew York NY 10179 Bianca A. Russo J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., 383 Madison Avenue, 31st FloorNew York NY 10179 Kunal K. Singh Kroll Bond Rating Agency, Inc., 845 Third Avnue, 4th Floor Attention: CMBS Surveillance New York NY 10022General Contact Moody's Investors Service, Inc. 7 World Trade Center250 Greenwich StreetAttn: Commercial Mortgage Surveillace Group New York NY 10007General Contact Morningstar Credit Ratings, LLC 220 Gibraltar Road, Suite 300 Attn: CMBS Surveillance Horsham PA 19044General Contact Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 9062 Old Annapolis Road Columbia MD 21045 Group Notices Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Document Custody Department1055 10th Avenue SEMAC N9401-011Minneapolis MN 55414Kathleen A. MarshallWilmington Trust, National Association1100 North Market StreetWilmington DE 19890 E Soriano
Exhibit









Exhibit 4.3




November 28, 2017 




Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C.  20549


		
	Re:
	The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company – Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017 




Ladies and Gentlemen:


The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, an Ohio corporation (“Scotts Miracle-Gro”), is today filing its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017 (the “Form 10-K”).


Neither Scotts Miracle-Gro nor any of its consolidated subsidiaries has outstanding any instrument or agreement with respect to its long-term debt, other than those filed or incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Form 10-K, under which the total amount of long-term debt authorized exceeds ten percent (10%) of the total assets of Scotts Miracle-Gro and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.  In accordance with the provisions of Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of SEC Regulation S-K, Scotts Miracle-Gro hereby agrees to furnish to the SEC, upon request, a copy of each such instrument or agreement defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of Scotts Miracle-Gro or the rights of holders of long-term debt of one of Scotts Miracle-Gro’s consolidated subsidiaries, in each case which is not being filed or incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Form 10-K.


Very truly yours,


THE SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO COMPANY


/s/ THOMAS RANDAL COLEMAN


Thomas Randal Coleman
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


14111 Scottslawn Road Marysville, OH 43041 937-644-0011     
www.scotts.com
Brian Sandoval Governor

Federal Aviation Administration MotorCarrier Division 555WrightWay Carson City, Nevada 89711-0600 Telephone (775) 684-4711 Fax Number(775) 684-4619 www.dmvnv.com January 15, 2016

Attention: Director, Office ofAirport Compliance and ManagementAnalysis 800 IndependenceAvenue, SW Washington, DC 20591 Gentlemen: Terri L. Albertson Director

This letter is being sent as afollow-up to a recent telephone conversation between Dawn Lietz, Deputy Administrator, Motor Carrier Division, and Jim Brown ofyour office. This conversation was aboutthe collection and distribution ofaviation gasoline excise taxes in Nevada. Currently Nevada Revised Statutes impose a2¢ pergallon state excise tax and a county option tax ofup to 8¢ per gallon on all aviation gasoline sold. The 2¢ tax is collected on all state-wide taxable sales and the option tax is collected and distributed only to those counties that have enacted thistax, currentlyfour (4) counties. The 2¢ tax is collected and transferred to the Civil Air Patrol account on a monthly basis and can only be used forthe following: a. Carry out its search, rescue and emergency operations, homeland defense and narcotics interdiction missions; b. Maintain a headquarters; and c. Purchase, maintain and repair emergencyand training equipment. Nofunds in the Civil Air Patrol account may be expended for: a. The purchase ofany aircraft; b. Travel expenses, or c. Training expenses The county option tax is collected and distributed as follows: a. Governmental entity which operates the airport if the airport is operated by a governmental entity; b. Governmental entity which owns the airport if the airport is owned but not operated by agovernmental entity c. County in which the airport is located ifthe airport is neitherowned noroperated by a governmental entity.
Thefunds received must be used bythe governmental entityto paythe cost of: a. Transportation projects related to airports, including access on the ground to airports;b. Payment of principal and interest on notes, bonds or other obligations incurred to fund projects; c. Promoting the use of an airport to increase the number and availability of flights at the airport; d. Contributing to theTrust Fund forAviation; e. Anycombination ofthose purposes. If you have any questions about the collection and distribution of Nevada's aviation gasoline excise taxes, please contact me at (775) 684-4626. Sincerely,



# ~11 DeputyAdministrator MotorCarrier Division DL/cs
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARY BAKEWELL,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 08-35991

D.C. No. 3:07-cv-01295-BR

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Anna J. Brown, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 10, 2009

Portland, Oregon

Before: FARRIS, D.W. NELSON and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

Mary Bakewell appeals the district court’s order affirming an Administrative

Law Judge’s determination that Bakewell was not disabled and therefore not

entitled to Social Security disability benefits. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1291 and we reverse. 

FILED

JAN 04 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

“We review the district court’s order affirming the ALJ’s denial of social

security benefits de novo, and will disturb the denial of benefits only if the decision

contains legal error or is not supported by substantial evidence.” Tommasetti v.

Astrue, 533 F.3d 1035, 1038 (9th Cir. 2008) (citations omitted). 

At step two of the sequential process for evaluating disability, 20 C.F.R. §

404.1520(a)(4)(ii), the ALJ concluded that Bakewell’s migraines were not a severe

impairment. The ALJ’s conclusion that Bakewell’s migraines remained under

excellent control with medication is not supported by substantial evidence. The

record indicates without contradiction that Bakewell’s migraines incapacitated her

for several days and that her persistent symptoms were not controlled effectively

with medication. Accordingly, there is no substantial evidence supporting the

ALJ’s position that Bakewell’s migraines do not “significantly limit[] [her]

physical or mental ability to do basic work activities,” 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520(c), as

the ALJ’s conclusion was based upon the erroneous factual finding that Bakewell’s

migraines are under control. 

Furthermore, the ALJ did not provide “specific and legitimate reasons that

are supported by substantial evidence in the record,” Lester v. Chater, 81 F.3d 821,

830–31 (9th Cir. 1995), for rejecting the opinion of Bakewell’s examining

physician, Dr. Roberts. The ALJ did not credit Dr. Roberts’s assessment of
3

limitations on Bakewell’s repetitive use of her hand, nor did the ALJ provide any

reason to reject this assessment. Because the ALJ ignored the opinion of Dr.

Roberts entirely, the ALJ erred. See id.

The ALJ predicated his ruling that Bakewell is not disabled on the erroneous

factual finding regarding Bakewell’s migraines, and he committed legal error by

ignoring the findings of Dr. Roberts. We therefore reverse the order of the district

court and remand with directions to reassess Bakewell’s claim consistent with this

disposition.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.