alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 11

Exhibit 11    Computation of Per Share Earnings  

              Statement Regarding Computation of Earnings Per Share
                     for the nine months ended September 30, 1997
                                     (Unaudited)

Assuming no dilution:
    Net income (in thousands)                    $   1,224
                                                 ---------
    Weighted average number 
         of shares:

         Average shares outstanding:             2,420,800
         Average incremental shares related
              to stock options                      69,717
                                                 ---------
                                                 2,490,517
                                                 ---------
                                                 ---------

    Income per share assuming no dilution:       $    0.49
                                                 ---------
                                                 ---------
Assuming full dilution:
    Net income (in thousands)                    $   1,224
                                                 ---------
                                                 ---------
    Weighted average number
         of shares:

         Average shares issued                   2,817,500
         Average incremental shares related
              to stock options                      69,717
         Average treasury shares                  (117,361)
                                                 ---------
                                                 2,769,856
                                                 ---------
                                                 ---------

    Income per share assuming full dilution:     $    0.44
                                                 ---------
                                                 ---------

Note:  

    Earnings per share are computed based upon the weighted average common 
and common equivalent shares outstanding for periods subsequent to the 
Company's initial stock offering on May 1, 1996.  Accordingly, earnings per 
share for the nine months ended September 30, 1996 are not meaningful.
**Docket No. F AA** **- 2013**  **- 0868**  

### Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted **Date** Response **National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti**  10/4/13 **Regional Airline Association** 10/4/1 3 **Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman**  10/4/13 **Airlines for America Robert Ireland**  10/4/13
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 18 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 18

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Congratulating the people of the Republic of Nicaragua on the success 
        of their democratic elections held on October 20, 1996.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 18

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas on October 20, 1996, the people of the Republic of Nicaragua held truly 
        democratic, multiparty elections to choose their government;
Whereas these elections were deemed by international and domestic observers to 
        be free and fair and a legitimate expression of the will of the people 
        of the Republic of Nicaragua;
Whereas on January 10, 1997, Arnoldo Aleman was peacefully sworn in to the 
        office of President of the Republic of Nicaragua and immediately 
        promised to continue down the path to democracy, national reconciliation 
        and reconstruction that was started by the previous administration of 
        President Violeta Barrios de Chamorro; and
Whereas this historic event of democratic elections in the Republic of Nicaragua 
        and the inauguration of President Arnoldo Aleman should be honored: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) congratulates the people of the Republic of Nicaragua 
        for the successful completion of the historic democratic, 
        multiparty elections held on October 20, 1996;
            (2) congratulates former President Violeta Barrios de 
        Chamorro for her personal courage and her commitment to 
        democracy, which have helped her achieve a profound political 
        and economic transition in the Republic of Nicaragua;
            (3) encourages all Nicaraguans to continue to work together 
        after taking this critical step on the long road to lasting 
        peace and democracy;
            (4) recognizes that all Nicaraguans should continue to work 
        together in order to ensure a stable democracy, respect for 
        human rights, a free and market-oriented economy, and social 
        justice for all people;
            (5) reaffirms the commitment of the United States to help 
        the Republic of Nicaragua move toward freedom and democracy; 
        and
            (6) further reaffirms that the United States is strongly 
        committed to encouraging democracy and peaceful development 
        throughout the Western Hemisphere.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 5, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# Attendee Report GoToWebinar

Webinar Name Webinar ID Energy Conservation Program: Test Procedures for Dehumidifiers 220295592 Total Attended 15 

# Session Details First Name Last Name Email CountryAddress City StateOrganization Zip Code lacy aliff US 11552 prosperous dr odessa FL Dais Analytic 33556 Mizanur Chowdhury CA 178 Rexdale Blvd Toronto ONCSA Group M9W 1R3 Kevin Churchill US 3933 US Route 11 Cortland NY Intertek 13045 Rachel Cluett US 529 14th St NW Washington DCACEEE 20010 Ashley Cocita US 8503 East Pleasant Valley Road IndependenceOHCSA Group 44131 lauren mattison US 100 5th Ave Waltham MACadmus 02451 Joanna Mauer US 529 14th St NW Suite 600 Washington DCAppliance Standards Awareness Project 20045 Sarah Medepalli US 1725 eye street, suite 1000 Washington DC ICF 20006 Renata Mortazavi CA 930 Carling Ave., Building 3,Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Ottawa ONNRCan Canada K1A 0Y3 Judd Smith US 8501 pleasant valley rd. independenceOH 44131 matt snyder US 3933 us route 11 cortland NY Intertek 13045 Yoolanda Williams US AP2-121, Appliance Park Louisville KY GE Appliances 40225 linda wilson US 120 Broadway New York NY 10271 Ed Wuesthoff US 10001 Reunion Place San Antonio TX Friedrich Air Conditioning Company, LTD 78216 Daniel Young US 1610 Harrison Oakland CA 94612 

# General InformationJune 13, 2014
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Onyx Acceptance Corporation
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, John W. Hall, President, CEO and Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  |                                                                                                 
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ JOHN W. HALL                                                                                
| |  |                                                                                                 
| |  | Name: John W. Hall
Title: President, CEO and Principal Executive Officer
Date: November 14, 2002

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-30440 Summary Calendar

WILMER DIXON, III Plaintiff-Appellant

v. LYNN COOPER; JA NE DOE, Nurse of Avoyelles Correctional Center in her individual and official capacity Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 1:06-CV-2330
Before KING, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Wilmer Dixon, federal prisoner # 29334-034, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit complaining that hewas denied medical carefor needle-like pain he experienced while temporarily housed in a Louisiana state correctional facility, Avoyelles Correctional Center, shortly after Hurricane Katrina. The district court dismissed Dixon’s suit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii) concluding, in part, that Dixon’s claim was untimely filed. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 28, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-30440

2 Dixon argues that, under Louisiana law, his complaint was timely filed because it did not accrue until September 20 06. However, “federal law determines when a § 1983 claim accrues.” J acobsen v. Osborne , 133 F.3d 315, 319 (5th Cir. 1998). “The standard for when a § 1983 claim accrues is when “the plaintiff is in possession of the ‘critical facts that he has been hurt and who has inflicted the injury.’” Lavellee v. Listi , 611 F.2d 1129, 1131 (5th Cir. 1980) (citation omitted). Dixon’s argument that he could not file his suit sooner because he did not know the warden’s name to name him as the defendant is meritless. There are countless cases, like L avellee , in which a plaintiff has brought suit againstJohn or Jane Doeswhen the defendant’s name is unknown, but the defendant’s position is known. E .g., id at 1129; Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Dixon’s claims accrued in September 2005, when he learned of the injury that formed the basis ofhis suit. Dixon did not file his suit until December 2006, after the one year deadline had expired. See Jacobsen, 133 F.3d at 319. Accordingly, weaffirm thejudgment ofthedistrict court dismissing Dixon’ssuit. Dixon’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. The district court’s dismissal ofDixon’s complaint countsasa strike under § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). Dixon received two strikes as a result of the distric t court’s dismissal of his complaint in Dixon v. Hubert, No. 07-30343, and our dismissal of that appeal. Dixon is therefore barred from proceeding in forma pauperis in any civil action
or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) BAR IMPOSED
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Monty G. Watson, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of The PB Financial Services Corporation
(the Registrant); 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report; 4. The Registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the
Registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of this report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; 5. The Registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, base on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit
committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and




---



##### 



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date:  March 31, 2005
    /s/ Monty G. WatsonMonty G. WatsonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                          Three Months Ended             Nine Months Ended
                                      ----------------------------    ---------------------------
                                       October 1,     October 2,      October 1,       October 2,
                                          1999           1998            1999             1998
                                      ------------    ------------    ------------    -----------



<S>                                     <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
Weighted average shares outstanding     10,654,947      10,223,672      10,570,482      9,621,000
                                      ------------    ------------    ------------    -----------

Total shares                            10,654,947      10,223,672      10,570,482      9,621,000
                                      ------------    ------------    ------------    -----------

Net Loss                              $ (1,155,498)   $ (1,889,206)   $ (3,776,212)   $(6,413,006)
                                      ============    ============    ============    ===========

Net Loss per share:     Basic         $      (0.11)   $      (0.18)   $      (0.36)   $     (0.67)
                                      ============    ============    ============    ===========
                        Diluted       $      (0.11)   $      (0.18)   $      (0.36)   $     (0.67)
                                      ============    ============    ============    ===========
</TABLE>


15
EXHIBIT 99.2
CERTIFICATION  OF  CHIEF  FINANCIAL  OFFICER

                                VILLAGEWORLD.COM
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  VillageWorld.Com,  (the "Small
Business Issuer") on Form 10-QSB for the three-month period ended March 31, 2003
as  filed  with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I,  Celia I. Schiffner, Chief Financial Officer of VillageWorld.Com,
certify  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  that:

     1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
15  (d)  of  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2)     The  information  contained  in  the  Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Small  Business  Issuer.

/s/  Celia  I.  Schiffner
-------------------------
Celia  I.  Schiffner
Chief  Financial  Officer
October 3,  2003

<PAGE>
#### Frederick SUTTON, Appellant, v. Calvin JOHNSON, Appellee.

No. 17-55112

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*361Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed December 21, 2017

Frederick Sutton, Pro Se

L. Ashley Aull, Assistant U.S. Attorney, DOJ — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P, 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Federal prisoner Frederick Sutton appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s denial of a section 2241 habeas petition, *see Reynolds v. Thomas,*603 F.3d 1144, 1148 (9th Cir. 2010), *abrogated m other grounds by Setser v. United States,*566 U.S. 231, 132 S.Ct. 1463, 182 L.Ed.2d 455 (2012). We affirm.'

Sutton argues that he is entitled to credit toward his federal sentence for the time spent in custody between January 5, 2009, and November 24, 2009. We disagree. Under 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b), a defendant cannot receive “double credit” — that is, credit going towards two separate sentences — for time spent in presentence custody. *See United States v. Wilson,*503 U.S. 329, 337, 112 S.Ct. 1351, 117 L.Ed.2d 593 (1992). Here, Sutton spent 317 days in presen-tence custody. Because the record reflects that the state of Michigan credited this time towards a prior Michigan state sentence, he is not entitled to credit this 317-day period towards his federal sentence. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3585(b).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2015-2460

 Directorate Identifier: 2014NM163AD

747-53A2499, R1 --- 10/30/2008

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      33,748,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,058,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   399,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            45,676,000
<PP&E>                                      12,416,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,728,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              59,279,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          751,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  51,404,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                59,279,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,663,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,537,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                92,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,546,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   539,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,007,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,007,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-20329 Conference Calendar

ULYSSES JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLE; OTHER UNKNOWN NAMED AGENCIES, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-02-CV-611

-------------------- February 19, 2003 Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ulysses Johnson, Texas prisoner # 794106, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) as frivolous and for failure to state a claim. Johnson argues that he has been denied parole based upon false and misleading information provided to the Texas Board of Pardons & Parole by a parole review officer, thereby depriving him of a due process liberty interest.No. 02-20329 -2- Texas law does not create an expectation of release on parole, and Johnson does not have a constitutional right to release. See Orellana v. Kyle , 65 F.3d 29, 32 (5th Cir. 1995); Williams v. Briscoe , 641 F.2d 274, 276-77 (5th Cir. 1981). Johnson’s allegations do not amount to a federal constitutional violation. See Johnson v. Rodriguez , 110 F.3d 299, 308 (5th Cir. 1997). Johnson’s appeal is wholly without arguable merit, is frivolous, and is therefore DISMISSED. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. The district court’s dismissal of his complaint counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), as does this court’s dismissal of the instant appeal. See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387 (5th Cir. 1996). We caution Johnson that if he accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). DISMISSED; THREE-STRIKES WARNING ISSUED.