Interim Decision #3048 

MATTER Or HILAIRE 

In Visa Petition Proceedings 

A-2745E061 

Decided by Board March 8, 1988 

A petitioner may submit a certified copy of a document in support of a visa petition in accordance with 8 C.F.R. § 204.20)(1) (1988); 

however, if the Immigration and Naturalization Service requests 

the original document in order to determine that document's authenticity, the petitioner must comply with that request under 8 

C.F.R. § 204.20)(3) (1988). 

ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: ON BEHALF OF SERVICE: 

Vincent J. Agresti, Esquire Teresita R. Guerrero 

56-58 Ferry Street General Attorney 

Newark, New Jersey 07105 

BY: Milhollan, Chairman; Dunne, Morris, Vacca, and Heilman, Board Members 

The lawful permanent resident petitioner applied for preference 

status for the beneficiary as his unmarried daughter under section 

203(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1153(a)(2) (1982). In a decision dated March 6, 1986, the Immigration and Naturalization Service Regional Adjudications Center 

("RAC") director denied the petition. The petitioner has appealed. 

The appeal will be dismissed. 

The beneficiary is a 31-year-old native and citizen of Haiti. The 

petitioner is a 72-year-old native and citizen of Haiti who was admitted to the United States on September 11, 1985, as a lawful permanent resident. On September 20, 1985, the petitioner filed a visa 

petition on behalf of the beneficiary claiming preference status for 

her as his unmarried daughter. A copy of an Extract from the Registers of Birth Certificates executed in September of 1985, and a 

copy of an Extract from the Registers of Marriage Certificates executed in January 1986, submitted with the visa petition, reflect 

that the beneficiary is the petitioner's legitimate daughter. 

566 
Interim Decision *3048 

On December 9, 1985, the Immigration and Naturalization Service informed the petitioner that "[gill birth and marriage certificates from Haiti must be in the form of original extracts from the 

National Archives which have been issued subsequent to July 12, 

1983." The petitioner failed to proffer the original documents requested by the Service. 

In a decision dated March 6, 198E, the RAC director denied the 

petition because the petitioner failed to submit the requested documentation. The RAC director stated in his written decision that the 

authenticity of foreign documents can be more easily verified in 

the original form rather than through copies. 

On. appeal, the petitioner argues that 8 C.F.R. § 204.2(h) (1982), 

subsequently redesignated as 204.2(j)(1) (1988), states that a copy of 

a document submitted in support of a visa petition filed pursuant 

to section 204 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1154 (1982), may be accepted, 

though unaccompanied by the original, if it bears a certification by 

an attorney. The petitioner argues that the copies of the birth and 

marriage certificates submitted in this case meet these requirements and should be accepted here. 

The general attorney for the Service argues in a written brief to 

the Board that the original documents must be submitted by the 

petitioner if requested by the Service, citing 8 C.F.R. § 204.20(3) 

(1988). 

In this case, we note that 8 § 204.2(j)(1) (1988) provides that 

a copy of a document properly certified by an attorney "may be accepted," but that 8 C.F.R. § 204.2(j)(3) (1988) clearly provides that 

the original document "must be submitted if requested by the Service." Here, the Service requested the original documents for review. 

The Service notes that it did so because of problems with fraudulent documents submitted in support of Haitian visa petitions in 

the past and its ability to more easily verify the authenticity of 

original documents. Under the provisions of 8 C.F.R. § 204.2(j)(3) 

(1988) the petitioner was required to submit the originals. As this 

was not done, the petition was properly denied. Accordingly, the 

appeal will be dismissed. 

ORDER: The appeal is dismissed. 

5A7