alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 7 A0 75 8 . LORENZ O FOREHAND v . THE STATE.

Lo ren zo Fo reh an d w as c o n v i ct ed o f ro b bery

, res i s ti n g an o ffi cer, fal s e i m p ri s o n m en t

, an d at t em

p t ed es cap e, an d t h o s e co n v ict i o n s w ere affi rm ed o n d i rect

ap p eal

. See Fo r e h a n d v

. S t a te

, 2 7 0 Ga. Ap p

. 3 65 (6 0 6 SE2 d 5 8 9 ) (2 00 4 ). In 2 0 1 5,

Fo reh an d fi l ed an ex t rao rd i n ary m o t i o n fo r n ew t ri al bas ed on newl y d i s co v ered

ev i d en ce. Th e t ri al co u rt d en i ed Fo reh an d ’ s m ot i on o n Oct o b er 2 4

, 2 0 1 6

. 1 Fo reh an d

t h ereaft er fi l ed a t i m el y n o t i ce o f ap p eal . W e, h owev er, l ack ju ri s d ict i o n

. Un d er OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (7 ), ap p eal s fro m t h e d en i al o f an ex t rao rd i n ary

m o ti o n fo r n ew t ri al m

u s t co m p l y wi t h t h e di s cret i o n ary ap peal p ro ced u re. Ba l kco m

v. St a t e , 2 2 7 Ga. Ap p

. 3 2 7

, 3 2 9 (4 8 9 SE2 d 1 2 9 ) (1 99 7 ). Fo reh an d ’ s fai l u re t o co m p l y wi t h t h e d i s cret i o nary ap p eal p ro ced u re d ep ri v es u s o f j u ri sd i ct i o n o ver t h i s ap p eal

, wh i ch i s h ereb y

DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y th a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

.

1 Al t h ou g h t h e t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er p u r p o rt s t o d i s m i s s Fo reh an d ’ s m o t i o n fo r

ex t rao rd i n ary n ew t ri al

, it op erat es as a d en i al rat h er t h an a d i s m i ss al becau s e t h e t ri al

co u rt co n s i d ered an d reject ed F o r e h a n d ’ s cl ai m s o n th e m eri t s

. In an y ev en t

, a t ri al

co u rt ’ s o rd er d i s m i s s i n g an ex t rao rd i n ary m o t io n fo r n ew t ri al m u s t al s o b e ap p eal ed

v i a th e d i s cret i o nary ap pl icat i o n p ro ces s

. See Da vi s v. S t at e , 1 82 Ga. Ap p. 7 3 6 (3 5 6

SE2 d 7 6 2) (1 9 8 7). December 20, 2016

12/20/2016
# EUR-Lex - 32003R0496 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32003R0496

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 496/2003 of 19 March 2003 temporarily derogating from Regulation (EC) No 1445/95 on rules of application for import and export licences in the beef and veal sector **

*
Official Journal L 074 , 20/03/2003 P. 0003 - 0003 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 496/2003

of 19 March 2003

temporarily derogating from Regulation (EC) No 1445/95 on rules of application for import and export licences in the beef and veal sector

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal(1), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2345/2001(2), and in particular Article 29(2) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1445/95(3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 118/2003(4), export licences are to be issued on the fifth working day following that on which the application was lodged provided that no specific action has been taken by the Commission in the meantime.

(2) Because of the public holidays in 2003 and the irregular appearance of the Official Journal of the European Union during those holidays, the period for reflection of five working days will be too brief to guarantee proper administration of the market. It should therefore be extended temporarily.

(3) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Beef and Veal,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

By derogation from Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1445/95, licences for which applications are lodged during the periods specified below shall be issued on the corresponding dates provided that no specific action as indicated in paragraph 2 of that Article has been taken prior to those dates:

>TABLE>

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 March 2003.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21.

(2) OJ L 315, 1.12.2001, p. 29.

(3) OJ L 143, 27.6.1995, p. 35.

(4) OJ L 20, 24.1.2003, p. 3.
# Official Journal L 78/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 78 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 645 March 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 78

English edition

Legislation

Volume 645 March 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/396 of 3 March 2021 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1809 concerning certain protective measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2021) 1547)

   (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/396 of 3 March 2021 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1809 concerning certain protective measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2021) 1547)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2021) 1547)

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
| Subsidiary                                     | ​ | ​ | Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Formation | ​ |
|------------------------------------------------|---------|---------|--------------------------------------------|---------|
| Falls Lake General Insurance Company           | ​ | ​ | Ohio                                       | ​ |
| Falls Lake Insurance Management Company, Inc.  | ​ | ​ | Delaware                                   | ​ |
| Falls Lake National Insurance Company          | ​ | ​ | Ohio                                       | ​ |
| Franklin Holdings II (Bermuda) Capital Trust I | ​ | ​ | Delaware                                   | ​ |
| James River Capital Trust I                    | ​ | ​ | Delaware                                   | ​ |
| James River Capital Trust II                   | ​ | ​ | Delaware                                   | ​ |
| James River Capital Trust III                  | ​ | ​ | Delaware                                   | ​ |
| James River Capital Trust IV                   | ​ | ​ | Delaware                                   | ​ |
| James River Casualty Company                   | ​ | ​ | Virginia                                   | ​ |
| James River Group, Inc.                        | ​ | ​ | Delaware                                   | ​ |
| James River Insurance Company                  | ​ | ​ | Ohio                                       | ​ |
| James River Management Company, Inc.           | ​ | ​ | Delaware                                   | ​ |
| James River Richmond Real Estate, LLC          | ​ | ​ | Virginia                                   | ​ |
| JRG Reinsurance Company, Ltd.                  | ​ | ​ | Bermuda                                    | ​ |
| Potomac Risk Services, Inc.                    | ​ | ​ | Virginia                                   | ​ |
| Stonewood Insurance Company                    | ​ | ​ | North Carolina                             | ​ |

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher J. DEANS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-4372

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 15, 2018

Decided: February 16, 2018

Raymond C. Tarlton, TARLTON POLK, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Makan Delrahim, Assistant Attorney General, Marvin N. Price, Jr., Acting Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Eric M. Meiring, James J. Fredricks, Adam D. Chandler, Antitrust Division, UNITED *179STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Christopher J. Deans seeks to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea to one count of conspiring to restrain trade or commerce in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1 (2012). He contends that the district court should have allowed him to withdraw his guilty plea pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(d) in light of previously unavailable, allegedly exculpatory testimony in the trial of one of Deans’ coconspirators. The Government seeks to dismiss the appeal as barred by the waiver of the right to appeal the conviction included in Deans’ plea agreement.

Upon review of the plea agreement and the transcript of the Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 hearing, we conclude that Deans knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal his conviction. Deans’ appeal of the district court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea falls within the compass of his waiver of appellate rights. *United States v. Alcala,*678 F.3d 574, 577-78 & n.1 (7th Cir. 2012) (collecting cases). Although Deans refers to the testimony he relied on in his motion to withdraw as *“Brady*evidence,” he does not allege and the record in no way suggests that his plea was tainted by government misconduct. He also does not contend that his plea was caused by ineffective assistance of counsel. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
# Official Journal L 85/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 85 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6128 March 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 85

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6128 March 2018

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/502 of 28 February 2018 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/799 laying down the requirements for the construction, testing, installation, operation and repair of tachographs and their components (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/502 of 28 February 2018 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/799 laying down the requirements for the construction, testing, installation, operation and repair of tachographs and their components (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

The undersigned executiveofficer of First Federal Bancshares of Arkansas, Inc. (the “Registrant”)hereby certifies that the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the three and ninemonths ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

 
|   |                  | By:    |   /s/ Larry J. Brandt      |
|--------|-----------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   |                  |   |   Larry J. Brandt          |
|   |                  |   |   Chief Executive  Officer |
|   |                  |   |                                 |
| Date:  | October 28, 2008 |   |                                 |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,781,213
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,247,723
<ALLOWANCES>                                    25,758
<INVENTORY>                                  1,505,702
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,778,935
<PP&E>                                       4,464,027
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,204,014
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,458,561
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,206,352
<BONDS>                                      2,578,311
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    15,016,915
<OTHER-SE>                                (10,343,017)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,458,561
<SALES>                                      3,603,693
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,603,693
<CGS>                                        2,815,423
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,950,018
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                25,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             383,680
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,436,255)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       150
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,436,405)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.70)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2004115EN.01003901.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/39

---

Commission Decision declaring that the measure notified by the Czech Republic, under the interim mechanism pursuant to Annex IV.3 of the Act of Accession, is not applicable after accession

(2004/C 115/17)

(Text with EEA relevance)

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids

---
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 751 

To require the Secretary of State to offer rewards for information on the 

kidnapping and murder of James Foley, Peter Kassig, Steven Sotloff, 

or the kidnapping and murder of any other citizen of the United States 

by a foreign terrorist organization. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2015 

Mr. GOSAR (for himself, Mr. COOK, Mr. DESANTIS, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. 

ZINKE, Mr. SALMON, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. PALAZZO, Mr. DUNCAN

of South Carolina, Mr. BROOKS of Alabama, Ms. MCSALLY, Mr. BABIN, 

Mr. FARENTHOLD, Mr. STEWART, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. BLUM, Mr. CLAWSON of Florida, Ms. KUSTER, and Mr. 

MCKINLEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of State to offer rewards for information on the kidnapping and murder of James Foley, 

Peter Kassig, Steven Sotloff, or the kidnapping and murder of any other citizen of the United States by a foreign 

terrorist organization. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bringing Terrorists 

5 to Justice Act’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 751 IH

1 SEC. 2. REWARDS AUTHORIZED. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—In accordance with the Rewards 

3 for Justice program authorized under section 36(b) of the 

4 State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 

5 U.S.C. 2708(b)), the Secretary of State shall offer a re6 ward to any individual who furnishes information leading 

7 to the arrest or conviction in any country of any individual 

8 for committing, conspiring or attempting to commit, or 

9 aiding or abetting in the commission of— 

10 (1) the kidnapping and murder of James Foley, 

11 Peter Kassig, or Steven Sotloff; or 

12 (2) the kidnapping and murder, on or after the 

13 date of the enactment of this Act, of any other cit14 izen of the United States by a foreign terrorist orga15 nization. 

16 (b) LIMITATIONS.— 

17 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of State shall 

18 not offer a reward under subsection (a) in connec19 tion with the kidnapping and murder of a citizen of 

20 the United States described in subsection (a)(2) who 

21 the Secretary of State determines was affiliated with 

22 or supportive of a foreign terrorist organization. 

23 (2) TOTAL AMOUNT OF REWARDS.—The total 

24 amount of rewards offered under subsection (a) in 

25 connection with the kidnapping and murder of any 

26 one of the individuals named in such subsection or 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 751 IH

1 any other citizen of the United States described in 

2 such subsection may not exceed $5,000,000. 

3 (c) FOREIGN TERRORIST ORGANIZATION.—The term 

4 ‘‘foreign terrorist organization’’ means an organization 

5 designated by the Secretary of State as a foreign terrorist 

6 organization in accordance with section 219 of the Immi7 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189). 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1176

CHRISTOS D. DEDES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

CHRISTOS D. DEDES, as Legal Custodian for his

children Quincy Sophia Dedes and Dionysios

Christos Dedes; ALL PARENTS SIMILARLY

SITUATED,

Plaintiffs,

versus

ROSWELL PAGE; JOHN O'BRION; MURRAY J. JANUS;

SYLVIA CLUTE; DONALD LEMONS; ALFRED SHILLING;

DANIEL T. BALFOUR; MELVIN R. HUGHES, Judge,

Judge of the Circuit Court in the City of

Richmond; RICHARD L. WILLIAMS, Judge, Judge of

the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Virginia,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-94-186-3)

Submitted: April 30, 1998 Decided: June 2, 1998
2

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christos D. Dedes, Appellant Pro Se. James Watson Morris, III,

MORRIS & MORRIS, Richmond, Virginia; John Henry O'Brion, Jr., COWAN

& OWEN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; Murray Joseph Janus, BREMNER,

JANUS & COOK, Richmond, Virginia; Sylvia Lanabeth Clute, Richmond,

Virginia; Alfred Louis Shilling, Richmond, Virginia; Daniel T.

Balfour, BEALE, BALFOUR, DAVIDSON, ETHERINGTON & PARKER, Richmond,

Virginia; Robert William Jaspen, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order awarding Fed. R.

Civ. P. 11 sanctions to various Defendants in this action. We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Dedes v. Page, No. CA-94-186-3 (E.D. Va. Jan. 2,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion

for monetary damages and to disbar M. J. Janus is denied, and the

Appellees' various motions for sanctions, attorney's fees, and

costs are denied.

AFFIRMED
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 136

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 31, 1997

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That, in consonance with section 132(a) of

3 the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946, when the

4 House adjourns on the legislative day of Friday, August

5 1, 1997 or Saturday, August 2, 1997, pursuant to a mo6 tion made by the Majority Leader or his designee, it stand

7 adjourned until noon on Wednesday, September 3, 1997,

8 or until noon on the second day after Members are notified

9 to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent res10 olution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate

11 recesses or adjourns at the close of business on Thursday,

12 July 31, 1997, Friday, August 1, 1997, or Saturday, Au13 gust 2, 1997, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority
2

HCON 136 RDS

1 Leader or his designee in accordance with this concurrent

2 resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on

3 Tuesday, September 2, 1997, or until such time on that

4 day as may be specified by the Majority Leader or his

5 designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon

6 on the second day after Members are notified to reassem7 ble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution,

8 whichever occurs first.

9 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

10 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

11 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead12 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House

13 and Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in their

14 opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Passed the House of Representatives July 31, 1997.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.