Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 48 / Friday, March 11, 2022 / Notices 13973 

1See Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube 

from Mexico: Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2019–2020, 86 FR 

50025 (September 7, 2021) (Preliminary Results), 

and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum (PDM). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Light-Walled Rectangular 

Pipe and Tube from Mexico: Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2019–2020,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

3See Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube 

from Mexico, the People’s Republic of China, and 

the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders; 

Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from the 

Republic of Korea: Notice of Amended Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 73 

FR 45403 (August 5, 2008) (Order). 

4See Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review of Light-Walled Rectangular 

Pipe and Tube from Mexico: Calculation of Margin 

for Respondents Not Selected for Individual 

Examination,’’ dated concurrently with this notice. 

In the case of two mandatory respondents, our 

practice is to calculate: (A) A weighted average of 

the weighted-average dumping margins calculated 

for the mandatory respondents using each 

company’s business proprietary total sales value of 

the subject merchandise; (B) a simple average of the 

weighted-average dumping margins calculated for 

the mandatory respondents: And (C) a weighted 

average of the weighted-average dumping margins 

calculated for the mandatory respondents using 

each company’s publicly ranged total sales value for 

the subject merchandise. We compare (B) and (C) 

to (A) and select the (B) or (C) rate that is closest 

to (A) as the most appropriate rate for the 

companies not selected for individual examination. 

See Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic 

Products from Taiwan: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014– 

2016, 82 FR 31555, 31556 (July 7, 2017). 

6See Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube 

from Mexico: Preliminary Results and Partial 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2018–2019, 85 FR 83886 (December 23, 

2020), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum at 6, unchanged in Light Walled 

Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2018–2019, 86 FR 33646 (June 25, 2021), 

where Commerce determined that Regiomontana de 

Perfiles y Tubos S. de R.L. de C.V. is the successorin-interest to Regiomontana de Perfiles y Tubos S.A. 

de C.V. The successor is merely a revision of the 

type of incorporation under Mexican law that did 

not impact the company’s ownership, management, 

or operations. For the current review, the 

petitioner’s review request included both the 

current and former versions of Regiopytsa’s 

company name. 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–201–836] 

Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and 

Tube From Mexico: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that sales of 

light-walled rectangular pipe and tube 

from Mexico were made at less than 

normal value during the period of 

review (POR) August 1, 2019, through 

July 31, 2020. 

DATES: Applicable March 11, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Conniff or Kyle Clahane, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office III, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–1009 or (202) 482–5449, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 7, 2021, Commerce 

published the preliminary results of this 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on light-walled 

rectangular pipe and tube (LWRPT) 

from Mexico.1 We invited interested 

parties to comment on the Preliminary 

Results. A summary of events that 

occurred since Commerce published the 

Preliminary Results, as well as a full 

discussion of the issues raised by parties 

for these final results, are discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum.2

Commerce conducted this review in 

accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 3

The product covered by the Order is 

light-walled rectangular pipe and tube 

from Mexico. For a full description of 

the scope, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

We addressed all issues raised in the 

case and rebuttal briefs in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.4 A list of the 

issues discussed in the Issues and 

Decisions Memorandum is attached in 

an appendix to this notice. The Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is available electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on our analysis of the 

comments received from interested 

parties, a review of the record, and for 

the reasons explained in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum, we made 

certain changes to the Preliminary 

Results. For detailed information, see 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

Rate for Non-Selected Companies 

The Act and Commerce’s regulations 

do not address the establishment of a 

weighted-average dumping margin to be 

applied to companies not selected for 

individual examination when 

Commerce limits its examination in an 

administrative review pursuant to 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, 

Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of 

the Act, which provides instructions for 

calculating the all-others rate in a lessthan-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, for 

guidance when calculating the 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

companies which were not selected for 

individual examination in an 

administrative review. Under section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others 

rate is normally an amount equal to the 

weighted average of the estimated 

weighted-average dumping margins 

established for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding 

rates that are zero, de minimis (i.e., less 

than 0.5 percent), or determined entirely 

on the basis of facts available. 

Consistent with section 735(c)(5)(A) 

of the Act, we determined the weightedaverage dumping margin for each of the 

non-selected companies based on the 

weighted-average dumping margins 

calculated for the mandatory 

respondents, Perfiles LM, S.A. de C.V. 

(Perfiles) and Regiomontana de Perfiles 

y Tubos S. de R.L. de C.V. (Regiopytsa) 

in this administrative review.5

Final Results of Review 

As a result of this review, Commerce 

determines the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the 

period August 1, 2019, through July 31, 

2020. 

Exporter or producer 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Perfiles LM, S.A. de C.V ...... 0.62 

Regiomontana de Perfiles y 

Tubos S. de R.L. de C.V.6 1.09 

Maquilacero S.A. de C.V ...... 0.96 

Nacional de Acero S.A. de 

C.V .................................... 0.96 

Productos Laminados de 

Monterrey S.A. de C.V ...... 0.96 

Ternium Mexico S.A. de C.V 0.96 

Disclosure 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations performed for these final 

results under administrative protective 

order within five days of the date of 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
13974 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 48 / Friday, March 11, 2022 / Notices 

7See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 8See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 9See Order. 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce has determined, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) shall 

assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. In 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

for Perfiles and Regiopytsa, the 

mandatory respondents, Commerce 

calculated importer-specific ad valorem 

antidumping duty assessment rates 

based on the ratio of the total amount of 

dumping calculated for each importer’s 

examined sales to the total entered 

value of those same sales. Where either 

a respondent’s weighted-average 

dumping margin is zero or de minimis 

within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific 

assessment rate is zero or de minimis, 

we will instruct CBP to liquidate the 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties. 

Consistent with the reseller policy, for 

entries of subject merchandise during 

the POR produced by the mandatory 

respondents for which they did not 

know their merchandise was destined 

for the United States, we intend to 

instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed 

entries at the all-others rate if there is no 

rate for the intermediate company(ies) 

involved in the transaction.7

The assessment rate for antidumping 

duties for each of the companies not 

selected for individual examination, 

will be equal to the weighted-average 

dumping margin identified above in the 

‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section. 

The final results of this review shall 

be the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by the final results 

of this review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable.8

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 41 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 356.8(a). If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for the companies 

listed above will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin 

established in the final results of this 

administrative review; (2) for 

merchandise exported by producers or 

exporters not covered in this review but 

covered in a prior completed segment of 

the proceeding, the cash deposit rate 

will continue to be the relevant 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recent period; (3) if the exporter is 

not a firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the original investigation, but 

the producer has been covered in a prior 

complete segment of this proceeding, 

then the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate established for the most recentlycompleted segment for the producer of 

the merchandise; and (4) the cash 

deposit rate for all other producers or 

exporters will continue to be 3.76 

percent,9 the all-others rate established 

in the less-than-fair-value investigation. 

These cash deposit requirements, 

when imposed, shall remain in effect 

until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results of administrative review in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: March 4, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Perfiles’ Reported Billing 

Adjustments 

Comment 2: Cohen’s d Test 

Comment 3: Application of Adverse Facts 

Available to Perfiles’ Home Market Sales 

Comment 4: Production Cost of Off-Grade 

and Defective Products 

Comment 5: Adjustment to Perfiles’ 

Reported Coil Cost 

Comment 6: Unreconciled Differences of 

Perfiles’ Production Costs 

Comment 7: Major Input Analysis 

Comment 8: Application of Adverse Facts 

Available to Regiopytsa’s Financial 

Expense Ratio 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–05211 Filed 3–10–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

North American Free Trade Agreement 

(NAFTA), Article 1904 Binational Panel 

Review: Notice of NAFTA Panel 

Decision 

AGENCY: United States Section, NAFTA 

Secretariat, International Trade 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of NAFTA panel 

decision in the matter of Ammonium 

Sulphate from the United States of 

America. (Secretariat File Number: 

MEX–USA–2015–1904–01). 

SUMMARY: On February 8, 2022, a 

NAFTA Binational Panel issued its 

Decision in the matter of Ammonium 

Sulphate from the United States of 

America (Determination on Remand). 

The Binational Panel remanded the 

Secretaria de Economia’s (Economia) 

Third Determination on Remand and 

ordered Economia to issue a 

redetermination within 90 days. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Vidya Desai, Acting United States 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1