alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 251 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 251

To commemorate and acknowledge the dedication and sacrifice made by the 
     men and women who have lost their lives while serving as law 
                         enforcement officers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 1996

 Mr. Kempthorne (for himself, Mr. Akaka, Mr. Ashcroft, Mr. Biden, Mr. 
 Bingaman, Mr. Bond, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Brown, Mr. Bryan, Mr. Burns, Mr. 
   Campbell, Mr. Chafee, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Coverdell, Mr. Craig, Mr. 
   D'Amato, Mr. Dole, Mr. Dorgan, Mr. Faircloth, Mr. Feingold, Mrs. 
 Feinstein, Mr. Ford, Mr. Frist, Mr. Gorton, Mr. Gramm, Mr. Gregg, Mr. 
   Heflin, Mr. Helms, Mr. Hollings, Mrs. Hutchison, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. 
Jeffords, Mrs. Kassebaum, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Kohl, Mr. Levin, 
Mr. Lott, Mr. McCain, Ms. Mikulski, Ms. Mosley-Braun, Mr. Moynihan, Mr. 
  Murkowski, Mr. Nickles, Mr. Pell, Mr. Reid, Mr. Robb, Mr. Roth, Mr. 
Sarbanes, Mr. Simon, Mr. Simpson, Mr. Smith, Mr. Specter, Mr. Stevens, 
 Mr. Thurmond, Mr. Warner, and Mr. Wellstone) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     To commemorate the 1996 National Peace Officers Memorial Day.

Whereas the well-being of all citizens of this country is preserved and enhanced 
        as a direct result of the vigilance and dedication of law enforcement 
        personnel;
Whereas more than 500,000 men and women, at great risk to their personal safety, 
        presently serve their fellow citizens in their capacity as guardians of 
        the peace;
Whereas peace officers are the front line in preserving our childrens' right to 
        receive an education in a crime-free environment that is all too often 
        threatened by the insidious fear caused by violence in schools;
Whereas 162 peace officers lost their lives in the performance of their duty in 
        1995, and a total of 13,575 men and women have now made that supreme 
        sacrifice;
Whereas every year 1 in 9 officers is assaulted, 1 in 25 is injured, and 1 in 
        4,000 is killed in the line of duty;
Whereas, on May 15, 1996, more than 15,000 peace officers are expected to gather 
        in our nation's Capital to join with the families of their recently 
        fallen comrades to honor them and all others before them: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate of the United States of America in Congress 
assembled, That May 15, 1996, is hereby designated as ``National Peace 
Officers Memorial Day'' for the purpose of recognizing all peace 
officers slain in the line of duty. The President is authorized and 
requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United 
States to observe this day with the appropriate ceremonies and respect.
                                 <all>
```
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 30967 Summary Calendar

TERRON J. WILLIAMS , Petitioner

- Appellant

v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Respondent

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:18

- CV

- 747

Before BARKSDALE, ELROD, and HO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Terron Jerese Williams , federal prisoner # 99202

- 179 and proceeding pro

se , pleaded guilty to conspir acy to possess , with intent to distribute , five kilograms or more of cocaine , and 50 grams or more of cocaine base , in the Southern District of Texas

. A s a career offender, Willi ams’ base offense level was enhanced based on his prior controlled

- substance convictions under Texas law. See U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1

.

* Pursuant to 5 th Cir. R. 47. 5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 th Cir. R. 47.5. 4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 1, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Cl erk Case: 18-30967 Document: 00514857645 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/01/2019No. 18

- 30967

2 Williams sought relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in the Western District of Louisiana, where he is now incarcerated, asserting his Texas convictions could not serve as predicates for enhanc ement purposes

— in effect , claiming to be innocent of the sentence imposed for his federal offense

. Concluding Williams could not proceed under § 2241 because he failed to
establish th e remedy provided by 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention , the district court dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The dismissal of a § 2241 motion is reviewed de novo

. Pack v. Yusuff , 218 F.3d 448, 451 (5t h Cir. 2000) (citation omitted)

. For the following reasons,
the district court properly dismiss ed Williams’ § 2241 motion for lack of jurisdiction. Williams had the burden to show no adequate or effective relief was attainable under § 2255, making relie f under § 2241 proper (the savings clause). J effers v. Chandler , 253 F.3d 827, 83 0 (5th Cir. 2001). But, “a section 2241 petition that seeks to challenge the validity of a federal sentence must either be dismissed or construed as a section 2255 motion”. Pack , 218 F.3d at
452 (citation omitted)

. Because being innocent of a career

- offender sentencing enhancem ent cannot satisfy the requirements of § 2255(e)’s savings clause, which might otherwise allow for § 2241 relief, Williams does not qualify for such relief. See Kinder v. Purdy , 222 F.3d 209, 213

– 14 (5th Cir. 2000). Further, b ecause the § 2241 motion wa s not filed in the sentencing court, but rather where Williams is incarcerated, “the district court did not have jurisdiction to treat” his motion as a § 2255 motion. Solsona v. Warden, F.C.I. , 821 F.2d 1129, 1132 (5th Cir. 1987) (citation omitted) ; see a lso Reyes

- Requena v. United States , 243 F.3d 893, 895 n.3 (5th Cir. 2001)

. AFFIRMED. Case: 18-30967 Document: 00514857645 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/01/2019
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

March 16, 2022; 10:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

This meeting will be held by video-conference only.

# STATUS:

                        Part of the meeting will be open to the public and available to view, streamed live, accessible from                         *www.fmc.gov.*                         The rest of the meeting will be closed to the public.                    

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

*Portions Open to the Public:*

1. Commissioner Sola, Update on Fact Finding 30: COVID-19 Impact on Cruise Industry

2. Staff Briefing on Ongoing Enforcement Activities

*Portions Closed to the Public:*

1. Staff Briefing on Ongoing Enforcement Activities

2. Area Representative Regional Activity Updates

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

William Cody, Secretary, (202) 523-5725.

William Cody,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-05261 Filed 3-9-22; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-02-P
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2013-NM-220-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sensata Technologies B.V. (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the
Company, certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|/S/    THOMAS
WROE      |  |  |  | /S/    JEFFREY
COTE    
|Thomas Wroe             |  |  |  | Jeffrey Cote           
|Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
|                        |  | 
|Date: February 17, 2009 |  |  |  | Date: February 17, 2009
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 313

Relating to the retirement of Jeanie Bowles, Superintendent of Documents,

United States Senate.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 3, 1996

Mr. LOTT submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Relating to the retirement of Jeanie Bowles, Superintendent

of Documents, United States Senate.

Whereas the Senate has been advised of the retirement of its

Superintendent of Documents, Ms. Jeanie Bowles;

Whereas Jeanie Bowles became an employee of the Senate of

the United States on January 3, 1971, and since that

date has ably and faithfully upheld the high standards

and traditions of the staff of the Senate of the United

States for a period that included thirteen Congresses;

Whereas Jeanie Bowles has served with distinction as Assistant Editor in the Office of the Official Reporters, which

position she was appointed to February 2, 1981;
2

SRES 313 ATS

Whereas Jeanie Bowles has served with distinction as Superintendent of Documents, which position she has held

since June 16, 1986; and

Whereas Jeanie Bowles has discharged her responsibilities

with efficiency, devotion, and grace, in particular dedicating her Senate service to the advancement of young people: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate of the United States com2 mends Jeanie Bowles for her exemplary service to the Sen3 ate and the Nation; wishes to express its deep gratitude

4 and appreciation for her long, faithful, and outstanding

5 service; and extends its best wishes upon her retirement.

6 SEC. 2. The Secretary of the Senate shall transmit

7 a copy of this resolution to Jeanie Bowles.

Æ
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 99

Commending the 125th anniversary of Allen University, and for other

purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 3 (legislative day, MARCH 27), 1995

Mr. THURMOND (for himself and Mr. HOLLINGS) submitted the following

resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Commending the 125th anniversary of Allen University, and

for other purposes.

Whereas Allen University in Columbia, South Carolina, is in

the midst of a year-long celebration of the 125th anniversary of the University;

Whereas Allen University has produced local and national

leaders who have served communities and the United

States in an exemplary way;

Whereas the late Bishop John Mifflin Brown and the people

of the Columbia Conference of the African Methodist

Episcopal Church had the vision to establish a school for

the education of newly freed slaves in 1870 in Cokesbury,

South Carolina, naming the school for the predecessor to

Bishop Brown, Bishop Daniel Alexander Payne, and appointing Professor J.W. Morris as president;
2

•SRES 99 ATS

Whereas Bishop William F. Dickerson led a successful effort

to relocate the school to Columbia, South Carolina, and

rename the school in 1880 for Bishop Richard Allen, the

founder of the African Methodist Episcopal Church, while

the Reverend James C. Waters assumed the presidency;

Whereas the University has a long tradition of producing

clergy and lay leadership for the African Methodist Episcopal Church;

Whereas the University has produced numerous scholars, attorneys, physicians, teachers, and business and governmental leaders, and other professionals who have risen to

positions of notoriety in the African-American community

as a whole;

Whereas Doctor Margaret Dixon is an exemplary Allen University Alumnae who has recently been elected as president of American Association of Retired People;

Whereas the University has endured all the difficulties familiar to historically black colleges and universities;

Whereas the University, with an historic campus, is an accredited member institution of the Southern Association

of Colleges and Schools;

Whereas the University, under the present leadership of

Bishop John Hurst Adams and President David T. Shannon, is equipped to serve non-traditional students and

others who would otherwise not have the opportunity for

a college education, as well as remaining faithful to the

traditional goals of the University of clergy and leadership education; and

Whereas the University still strives to live up to the motto

of the University, which is ‘‘Heads to Think, Hands to

Work, and Hearts to Love’’: Now, therefore, be it
3

•SRES 99 ATS

1 Resolved, That Congress—

2 (1) commends Allen University for 125 years of

3 progress, commitment, and dedication in the shaping

4 of productive lives; and

5 (2) extends best wishes to Allen University and

6 hopes that the University will have a productive fu7 ture that continues the accomplishments of the past.

Æ
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-18-00843-CV

In re Kirk Wayne McBride, Sr.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Edward Smith, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Kelly and Smith

Filed: May 22, 2019
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6375 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 7, 2016 

Received 

AN ACT 

To provide for consideration of the extension under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of nonapplication of 

No-Load Mode energy efficiency standards to certain 

security or life safety alarms or surveillance systems. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 6375 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Power And Security 

3 Systems (PASS) Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF NONAPPLICATION OF NO-LOAD 

5 MODE ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARD TO 

6 CERTAIN SECURITY OR LIFE SAFETY ALARM 

7 OR SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS. 

8 (a) Section 325(u)(3)(D)(ii) of the Energy Policy and 

9 Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6295(u)(3)(D)(ii)) is amend10 ed— 

11 (1) by striking ‘‘2015’’ and inserting ‘‘2021’’; 

12 and 

13 (2) by striking ‘‘2017’’ and inserting ‘‘2023’’. 

14 (b) Section 325(u)(3)(E) of the Energy Policy and 

15 Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6295(u)(3)(E)) is amend16 ed— 

17 (1) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘July 1, 2017,’’ 

18 and inserting ‘‘the effective date of the amendment 

19 under subparagraph (D)(ii)’’; and 

20 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

21 ‘‘(iv) TREATMENT IN RULE.—In the 

22 rule under subparagraph (D)(ii) and sub23 sequent amendments the Secretary may 

24 treat some or all external power supplies 

25 designed to be connected to a security or 

26 life safety alarm or surveillance system as 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 6375 RDS

1 a separate product class or may extend the 

2 nonapplication under clause (ii).’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 6, 

2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
| (logo)  WELLS FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as ofOctober 1, 2014, by and among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage SecuritiesCorp., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as MasterServicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Certificate Administrator, Wilmington Trust, NationalAssociation, as Trustee, and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior TrustAdvisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2014-C24 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director ofCommercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.      Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.      To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. |                                                                            (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
**EXHIBIT31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Robert S. Herlin, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Evolution Petroleum Corporation, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Evolution Petroleum Corporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theRegistrant and have:

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theRegistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe Registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

 
|        | Date: May 14, 2008 | /s / ROBERT S. HERLIN |
|--------|-------------------------|-----------------------|
|   |                    |                  | Robert S. Herlin |
|   |                    |                  | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----