alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

 

The undersigned, Robert S. Herlin, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of Evolution Petroleum Corporation (the “Company”), certifiesin connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission ofthe Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2007 (the “Report”) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed thiscertification as of the 14th day of November, 2007.

 
|   | /s/ ROBERT S. HERLIN                  |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert S. Herlin                      |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Evolution Petroleum Corporation and will beretained by Evolution Petroleum Corporation and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certificate isbeing furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to thisForm 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.

 

1

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                              CAUTIONARY STATEMENT


         Reality Interactive, Inc. (the "Company"), or persons acting on behalf
of the Company, or outside reviewers retained by the Company making statements
on behalf of the Company, or underwriters, from time to time make, in writing or
orally, "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended. When used in conjunction with an identified
forward-looking statement, this Cautionary Statement is for the purpose of
qualifying for the "safe harbor" provisions of such sections and is intended to
be a readily available written document that contains factors which could cause
results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements. These factors
are in addition to any other cautionary statements, written or oral, which may
be made or referred to in connection with any such forward-looking statement.

         The following matter, among others, may have a material adverse effect
on the business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations or
prospects, financial or otherwise, of the Company. Reference to this Cautionary
Statement in the context of a forward-looking statement or statements shall be
deemed to be a statement that may cause actual results to differ materially from
those in such forward-looking statement or statements:

        DISCONTINUATION OF CURRENT OPERATIONS. The Company ceased its business
operations effective April 30, 1999. Management of the Company believes this
action was necessary in light of the Company's current liquidity needs and lack
of short-term revenue opportunities. The Company is currently exploring
potential uses for the Company in its current form as an inoperative public
company. In the meantime, the Company intends to comply with all SEC filing
requirements in order to maintain the Company's good standing under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In the event the Company is unable
to find a suitable acquisition or merger candidate or other suitable use for the
Company in the near future, the Company will be liquidated and its remaining
assets will be distributed to its creditors in satisfaction of its then-current
obligations and, if any assets remain thereafter, to its shareholders. There can
be no assurance that any such candidate or other suitable use for the Company or
its assets will be found.





                                       11
### Faulk, Scott (OST) From: Sent: To: Subject: Hello, Pa'oneakai Lee-Namakaeha <kauikeolani_2004@hotmail.com> Thursday, November 14, 2013 11:42 AM EAS (OST) In Support of Makani Kai for EAS in Kalaupapa

I am in continued support of Makani Kai air service intothe Settlement of Kalaupapa. They have supported our communityfor a couple ofyears now providingtimely scheduled flights, excellent customer service, and have boosted morale in the community by offering low dailyfares to residents. Thank you foryour consideration! Pa'one

1
**EXHIBIT32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**(18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned, Sterling H. McDonald, Chief FinancialOfficer of Evolution Petroleum Corporation (the “Company”), certifies inconnection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of theCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31,2006 (the “Report”)”) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed thiscertification as of the 14th day of February, 2007.
|   |   |                     |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|
|        |   | /s/ STERLING H. MCDONALD |   |
|   |   | Sterling H. McDonald     |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer  |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Evolution Petroleum Corporation and will beretained by Evolution Petroleum Corporation and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certificate is being furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission as an exhibit to this Form 10-QSB and shall not beconsidered filed as part of the Form 10-QSB.

 

----
----

**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to**

**Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)**

**as Adopted Pursuant to****Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Lihui Song, the Chief Executive Officer of Nevstar Corporation, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Nevstar Corporation;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of QualMark Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles
D. Johnston, President & Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.

/s/ Charles D. Johnston
--------------------------------
Charles D. Johnston
President & Chief Executive Officer
November 11, 2004

In connection with the Quarterly Report of QualMark Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony
A. Scalese Chief Financial Officer & Principal Accounting Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.

/s/ Anthony A. Scalese
--------------------------------
Anthony A. Scalese
Chief Financial Officer & Principal Accounting Officer
November 11, 2004

A signed original of these written statements required by section 906 have been
provided to QualMark Corporation and will be retained by QualMark Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 116 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 116

     Recognizing and commending the Lakota and Dakota Code Talkers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                  May 8 (legislative day, May 1), 1995

  Mr. Daschle (for himself, Mr. Pressler, Mr. Inouye, and Mr. McCain) 
 submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Recognizing and commending the Lakota and Dakota Code Talkers.
Whereas the Lakota and Dakota Code Talkers, Native Americans who were members of 
        the Sioux nation, worked in radio communications during World War II and 
        used their Lakota and Dakota languages to relay communications;
Whereas Japanese cryptologists never deciphered the Native American languages 
        that were used as codes during World War II, including the Lakota and 
        Dakota languages; and
Whereas the Lakota and Dakota Code Talkers deserve to be recognized for their 
        contribution to the successful resolution of the war effort in the 
        Pacific: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate recognizes and commends the Lakota and 
Dakota Code Talkers for their invaluable contribution to the successful 
resolution of World War II.
                                 <all>
```
Mr. Dennis DeVany Chief, Essential Air Service Division Office of Aviation Analysis US Dept. ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue SE Washington DC, 20590

# / May 15th, 2013 l.,,,.....

•. i )"·.

'. i RE: DOT-OST-2000-8556- Continuationof AlaskaAirlines EAS Service at Adak, Alaska Dear Mr. DeVany, This letter is to express strong support for Alaska Airlines being selected to continue to provide essential air service usingjetaircraftto our community. Adak Community Development Corporation (ACDC) is a non-profit community organization devoted to promoting seafoodharvesting andprocessing capacity in Adak. ACDC has invested in seafood infrastructure in Adak that is extremely dependant on the type andreliability of service providedby Alaska Airlines. We have reviewed the proposal for provision of Essential Air Service and firmly believe that Alaska Airlines is the bestvalue. The service Alaska Airlines is currently providing is critical for the continued access and economic wellbeing of Adak as well as thatofthis entire regionofthe state. The existing pattern of service
- usingjet aircraft
- offers important benefits that would be difficult, ifnotimpossible, to matchwith any other type ofservice or aircrafttype:
• Route network 

## J ease of connections- Alaska Airlines route system now stretches coast to coast and marketing partnerships with other carriers provide virtually a global reach. Service from our community to the hub in Anchorage provides easy access to this network.
• Incoming freight capabilities
- Our community depends on scheduled air freight shipments for many of our daily**n~cessities** and the added cargo capacity ofAlaska's"combi" aircraft is extremely important. Additionally, our economic base is closely tied to commercialfishing.
• Outgoing freight capabilities
- Alaska'sjet service offers key cargo capacity allowing transport of 10,000 lbs or more of fresh seafood products to the rest of the U.S. in a timely, dependable manner. ACDC is involved in shipping live crab and fresh halibut out of Adak on Alaska Airlines, and this marketing channel has been critical to ourlocal fleet. Giventhe lack of any road systemconnecting our extremely remote community with the rest of the state, Adak is particularly isolated. Accordingly, ACDC and the other participants in the seafood industry are extremely dependent on reliable air access. Alaska Airlines has providedthis access very capably for the manyyears. For these reasons, we respectfully urge DOT to select Alaska Airlines for continued essential air service to Adak. Thankyou for your consideration ofour comments. Sincerely,

Adak Community DevelopmentCorporation 

### P.O. Box 1943 Adak AK, 99546
#### Kelvin A. CANADA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Natasha GREGG, MSA Dietitian for Virginia Dept. of Corrections; P. Scarberry, Head Food Director at Red Onion State Prison; S. Stallard, Head Food Director at Wallens Ridge State Prison; Harold Clarke, Director of VA. Dept. of Corrections, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-7249

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 30, 2018

Decided: February 2, 2018

Kelvin A. Canada, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Hull Davidson, Assistant Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kelvin A Canada appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment and dismissing his complaint seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc to 2000cc-5 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Canada v. Gregg,*No. 7:16-cv-00266-JPJ-RSB, 2017 WL 4019445 (W.D. Va. Sept. 12, 2017). We deny Canada’s request for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

The undersigned executive officer of First Federal Bancshares ofArkansas, Inc. (the “Registrant”) hereby certifies that the Registrant’s Form 10-Qfor the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrant.

 

 
|                                        | By:    | /s/ Sherri R. Billings  |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                                        |   | Sherri R. Billings      |
|                                        |   | Chief Financial Officer |
|                                        |   |                    |
| Date:   August 7,  2009 |   |                    |

 

----
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No s . 10 - 20 - 00303 - CV ; 10 - 20 - 0030 4 - CV ; 10 - 20 - 0030 5 - CV ; 10 - 20 - 0030 6 - CV ; 10 - 20 - 0030 7 - CV ; 10 - 20 - 0030 8 - CV IN RE ALFRED LEE STONE Original Proceeding From the 12 th District Court Walker County, Texas Trial Court No s . 12 - 0084; 14 - 0076; 18 - 2902; 19 - 29K; 20 - 466; 20 - 625C

MEMORANDUM OPINION In one motion, Relator, Alfred Lee Stone, a prison inmate, moved to rescind the R espondent ’s order of withdrawal in these six trial court cases : 12
- 0084, 14
- 0076, 18
- 2902, 19
- 29K, 20
- 466, a nd 20
- 625C
. According to Relator, Respondent, the trial court, refused to rule, and the motion was returned to Relator by the District Clerk’s Office. In a petition for writ of mandamus filed on November 24, 2020, Relator request ed a mandamus from this Court ordering Respondent to rule on Relator’s motion in all six cases
.In re Stone Page 2 After re questing a response, we received an order from Respondent indicating that only one of the withdrawal orders mentioned in Relator’s petition originated in Respondent’s court ; that being case number 20
- 466
. Respondent denied Relator’s Motion to Rescind to the extent it had jurisdiction
. Ac c ordingly, Rel ator’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus pertaining to case number 20
- 466, that being docket number 10
- 20
- 00307
- CV , is dismissed as moot. Because the remaining petitions for writ of mandamus were directed toward Re spondent’s failure to rule on motions not pending in Respondent’s co urt and thus not within Respondent’s jurisdiction, those petitions, numbered 10
- 20
- 00 303
- CV, 10
- 20
- 00304
- CV, 10
- 20
- 00305
- CV, 10
- 20
- 00306
- CV, and 10
- 20
- 00308
- CV, are denied.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Neill , and Justice Johnson Petition dismissed Petitions denied Opinion delivered a nd filed January 20 , 2021 [OT06]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

          - [Docket No. 22-06]

Notice is given that a complaint has been filed with the Federal Maritime Commission (Commission) by Royal White Cement, Inc., hereinafter “Complainant”, against CMA CGM S.A. and CMA CGM (America) LLC, “Respondents”. Complainant alleges that Respondent CMA CGM S.A. is a French corporation or similar form of entity, and that Respondent CMA CGM (America) LLC is a New Jersey limited liability company. Complainant alleges that Respondents are common carriers.

                    Complainant alleges that Respondents violated 46 U.S.C. 41102(c) with regard to refusal to accept bookings and provide equipment to accomplish such bookings pursuant to an agreed service contract. The full text of the complaint can be found in the Commission's Electronic Reading Room at                     *https://www2.fmc.gov/​readingroom/​proceeding/​22-06/​.*

This proceeding has been assigned to Office of Administrative Law Judges. The initial decision of the presiding office in this proceeding shall be issued by March 21, 2023, and the final decision of the Commission shall be issued by October 5, 2023.

William Cody,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-06233 Filed 3-23-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-02-P
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00232-CV

Alicia Ramirez

v.

Craig Deen

§

§

§

§

From the 43rd District Court

of Parker County (CV10-0506)

August 28, 2014

Opinion by Justice Meier

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that Appellant Alicia Ramirez shall pay all costs of this 

appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bill Meier 

 Justice Bill Meier
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-13-00868-CV

FORT DUNCAN MEDICAL CENTER INC.,

Appellant

v.

Edwin Martin and Esther Martin, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Robert 

Edwin MARTIN and Esther Martin, Individually 

and as Representative of the Estate of Robert Martin,

Appellees

From the 365th Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10-12-26093-MCVAJA

Honorable Amado J. Abascal, III, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 28, 2014

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion and 

dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

PER CURIAM