Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2022 / Notices 16457 

1See Notice of Amended Final Determinations: 

Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from Belgium and 

South Africa; and Notice of Countervailing Duty 

Orders: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from Belgium, 

Italy and South Africa, 64 FR 25288 (May 11, 1999) 

(Order). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 86 

FR 68220 (December 1, 2021). 

3See ATI’s Letter, ‘‘Five-Year (Sunset) Review of 

the Countervailing Duty Order on Stainless Steel 

Plate in Coils from South Africa—Domestic 

Interested Party’s Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ 

dated December 15, 2021; see also Outokumpu’s 

Letter, ‘‘Five-Year (Sunset) Review of the 

Countervailing Duty Order on Stainless Steel Plate 

in Coils from South Africa—Outokumpu’s Notice of 

Intent to Participate,’’ dated December 15, 2021. 

4See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘FiveYear (Sunset) Review of the Countervailing Duty 

Order on Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from South 

Africa—Domestic Interested Parties’ Substantive 

Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated January 3, 

2022. 

5See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews 

Initiated On December 1, 2021,’’ dated January 20, 

2022. 

6For a complete discussion of the scope, see 

Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum 

for the Final Results of the Fourth Sunset Review 

of the Countervailing Duty Order on Stainless Steel 

Plate in Coils from South Africa,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: March 14, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2022–06076 Filed 3–22–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–791–806] 

Stainless Steel Plate in Coils From 

South Africa: Final Results of the 

Expedited Fourth Five-Year Sunset 

Review of the Countervailing Duty 

Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset 

review, the Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) finds that revocation of the 

countervailing duty (CVD) order on 

stainless steel plate in coils (SSPC) from 

South Africa would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of 

countervailable subsidies at the levels 

indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset 

Review’’ section of this notice. 

DATES: Applicable March 23, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kristen Johnson, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4793. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On May 11, 1999, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of the CVD order on SSPC from 

South Africa.1 On December 1, 2021, 

Commerce published the notice of 

initiation of the fourth sunset review of 

the Order, pursuant to section 751(c) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act).2 On December 15, 2021, 

Commerce received notices of intent to 

participate from ATI Flat Rolled 

Products Holdings, LLC (ATI) and 

Outokumpu Stainless USA LLC 

(Outokumpu) (collectively, the domestic 

interested parties) within the deadline 

specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3

The domestic interested parties claimed 

interested party status within the 

meaning of section 771(9)(C) of the Act 

and 19 CFR 351.102(b)(29)(v) as 

domestic producers of SSPC in the 

United States. 

On January 3, 2022, Commerce 

received an adequate substantive 

response from the domestic interested 

parties within the 30-day deadline 

specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).4

Commerce did not receive a substantive 

response from either the Government of 

South Africa or a respondent interested 

party to this proceeding. On January 20, 

2022, Commerce notified the U.S. 

International Trade Commission that it 

did not receive an adequate substantive 

response from respondent interested 

parties.5 As a result, Commerce 

conducted an expedited (120-day) 

sunset review of the Order, pursuant to 

section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(B)(2) and (C)(2). 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the Order 

is certain stainless steel plate in coils. 

Stainless steel is an alloy steel 

containing, by weight, 1.2 percent or 

less of carbon and 10.5 percent or more 

of chromium, with or without other 

elements. The subject plate products are 

flat-rolled products, 254 mm or over in 

width and 4.75 mm or more in 

thickness, in coils, and annealed or 

otherwise heat treated and pickled or 

otherwise descaled. The subject plate 

may also be further processed (e.g., 

cold-rolled, polished, etc.) provided that 

it maintains the specified dimensions of 

plate following such processing. 

Excluded from the scope of the Order 

are the following: (1) Plate not in coils, 

(2) plate that is not annealed or 

otherwise heat treated and pickled or 

otherwise descaled, (3) sheet and strip, 

and (4) flat bars. 

The merchandise subject to the Order 

is currently classifiable in the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) at subheadings: 

7219.11.00.30, 7219.11.00.60, 

7219.12.00.06, 7219.12.00.21, 

7219.12.00.26, 7219.12.00.51, 

7219.12.00.56, 7219.12.00.66, 

7219.12.00.71, 7219.12.00.81, 

7219.31.00.10, 7219.90.00.10, 

7219.90.00.20, 7219.90.00.25, 

7219.90.00.60, 7219.90.00.80, 

7220.11.00.00, 7220.20.10.10, 

7220.20.10.15, 7220.20.10.60, 

7220.20.10.80, 7220.20.60.05, 

7220.20.60.10, 7220.20.60.15, 

7220.20.60.60, 7220.20.60.80, 

7220.90.00.10, 7220.90.00.15, 

7220.90.00.60, and 7220.90.00.80. 

Although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

merchandise subject to the Order is 

dispositive.6

Analysis of Comments Received 

A complete discussion of all issues 

raised in this sunset review, including 

the likelihood of continuation or 

recurrence of subsidization in the event 

of revocation of the Order and the 

countervailable subsidy rates likely to 

prevail if the Order were to be revoked, 

is provided in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. A list of the topics 

discussed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is attached as an 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS), which is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 

752(b) of the Act, we determine that 

revocation of the Order would be likely 

to lead to continuation or recurrence of 

countervailable subsidies at the 

following net countervailable subsidy 

rates: 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
16458 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2022 / Notices 

1See Organic Soybean Meal from India: 

Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at 

Less Than Fair Value, Postponement of Final 

Determination, and Extension of Provisional 

Measures, 86 FR 60443 (November 2, 2021) 

(Preliminary Determination), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Final Determination in the Less-Than-FairValue Investigation of Organic Soybean Meal from 

India,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

3See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Organic Soybean Meal 

from India Antidumping Duty Investigation: 

Questionnaire in Lieu of Verification,’’ dated 

January 7, 2022; see also Bergwerff’s Letter, 

‘‘Organic Soybean Meal from India: In Lieu of 

Onsite Verification Questionnaire Response,’’ dated 

January 19, 2022. 

Producer/exporter 

Subsidy 

rate 

(percent 

ad 

valorem 

Columbus Stainless Steel Company (the operating division of 

the Columbus Joint Venture) .. 3.95 

All Others .................................... 3.95 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return or destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

Commerce is issuing and publishing 

these final results and this notice in 

accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), 

and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218. 

Dated: March 16, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. History of the Order 

V. Legal Framework 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

1. Likelihood of Continuation or 

Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy 

2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Likely to 

Prevail 

3. Nature of the Subsidy 

VII. Final Results of the Sunset Review 

VIII. Recommendation. 

[FR Doc. 2022–06075 Filed 3–22–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–901] 

Organic Soybean Meal From India: 

Final Affirmative Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that organic 

soybean meal from India is being, or is 

likely to be, sold in the United States at 

less than fair value (LTFV). 

DATES: Applicable March 23, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Andrew Huston, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–4261. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On November 2, 2021, Commerce 

published the Preliminary 

Determination in this investigation.1 A 

summary of the events that occurred 

since Commerce published the 

Preliminary Determination, as well as a 

full discussion of the issues raised by 

parties for this final determination, may 

be found in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.2

Period of Investigation 

The period of investigation is January 

1, 2020, through December 31, 2020. 

Scope of the Investigation 

The product covered by this 

investigation is organic soybean meal 

from India. For a complete description 

of the scope of this investigation, see 

Appendix I. 

Scope Comments 

No interested party commented on the 

scope of the investigation as it appeared 

in the Preliminary Determination. 

Therefore, no changes were made to the 

scope of the investigation. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case briefs and 

rebuttal briefs submitted by interested 

parties in this proceeding are discussed 

in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. A list of the issues raised 

by parties and responded to by 

Commerce in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is attached to this notice 

as Appendix II. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is available electronically via 

Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Verification 

Commerce was unable to conduct onsite verification of the information 

relied upon in making its final 

determination in this investigation. 

However, we took additional steps in 

lieu of an on-site verification to verify 

the information relied upon in making 

this final determination, in accordance 

with section 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act).3

Changes Since the Preliminary 

Determination 

Based on our analysis of the 

comments received and additional 

information obtained since our 

preliminary findings, we made certain 

changes to the margin calculations for 

Bergwerff Organic India Private Limited 

(Bergwerff), the sole cooperative 

respondent in this investigation, after 

the Preliminary Determination. For a 

discussion of these changes, see the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

All-Others Rate 

Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act 

provides that the estimated weightedaverage dumping margin for all other 

producers and exporters not 

individually investigated shall be equal 

to the weighted average of the estimated 

weighted-average dumping margins 

established for individually investigated 

exporters and producers, excluding any 

margins that are zero or de minimis or 

any margins determined entirely under 

section 776 of the Act. Commerce 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1