alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.2 

















 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 







 We have issued our report dated November 17, 2017, with respect to the financial statement of Alaia Market Linked Trust Series 6-1, comprising the Alaia Defined Outcome Solution, contained in Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-220683) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”. 












 /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 







 Chicago, Illinois 


 November 17, 2017
|       (i)  | the accompanying report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|       (ii)      | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                            |   |                                                                   |
|---------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  March 17, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Andrew J. Buckland                                                 |   |
|                            |   | Andrew J. BucklandChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer) |

----
# C_2012118EN.01001501.xml

| 21.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/15

---

Action brought on 9 February 2012 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-67/12)

2012/C 118/24

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann and I. Galindo Martin, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Articles 3, 7 and 8 of Directive 2002/91/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the energy performance of buildings, and in any event, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under those articles, in conjunction with Article 29 of Directive 2010/31/EU (2) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Articles 3, 7 and 8 of Directive 2002/91/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the energy performance of buildings, and in any event, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under those articles, in conjunction with Article 29 of Directive 2010/31/EU (2) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings;

1

2

| — | order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

| 1. | Article 15 of Directive 2002/91/EC provides that the Member States are to adopt the provisions necessary to comply with the directive at the latest on 4 January 2006. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 15 of Directive 2002/91/EC provides that the Member States are to adopt the provisions necessary to comply with the directive at the latest on 4 January 2006.

| 2. | The Commission states that the Kingdom of Spain has yet to adopt the necessary provisions referred to in Articles 3, 7 and 8 of Directive 2002/91/EC or, in any event, has failed to communicate them to it. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Commission states that the Kingdom of Spain has yet to adopt the necessary provisions referred to in Articles 3, 7 and 8 of Directive 2002/91/EC or, in any event, has failed to communicate them to it.

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 1, p. 65.

1

(2)  OJ 2010 L 153, p. 13.

2

---
**Exhibit 15.3**

** **

May 15, 2015

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549-7561

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

We have read Item 16F of Form 20-F dated May 15, 2015, of International Game Technology Plc and are in agreement with the statements contained in paragraphs seven and eight therein. We have no basis to agree or disagree with other statements of the registrant contained therein.

 

 
| Yours   truly,                              |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                        |   |
|                                        |   |
| /s/   Reconta Ernst & Young S.p.A. |   |
| Rome,   Italy                               |   |

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Loral
Space & Communications Ltd. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the three months ending March 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Bernard L.
Schwartz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the
    requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ BERNARD L. SCHWARTZ
| |                        
| | Bernard L. Schwartz    
| | Chief Executive Officer

May 10, 2004
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Javier PEREZ-AVILES, also known as Javier Moreno-Perez, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40310 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 20, 2017

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Javier Perez-Aviles, Pro Se

Before JONES, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Javier Perez-Aviles has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Perez-Aviles has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no *260nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)


The undersigned, Robert S. Herlin, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Natural Gas Systems, Inc. (the "Company"), certifies in connection with the
filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report")")
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
and for the periods covered in the Report.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
___ day of February, 2005.


/s/ Robert S. Herlin
--------------------------
Robert S. Herlin
Chief Executive Officer
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 243

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Federal Government should

increase its support for basic and applied scientific research, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 12, 1998

Mr. ROGAN submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Science

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Federal Government should increase its support for basic and applied

scientific research, and for other purposes.

Whereas the United States consistently has been the world’s

strongest supporter of basic and applied scientific research;

Whereas the Congress, with the support of the American people, has shown the wisdom and foresight to generously

support basic and applied scientific research;

Whereas scientific discoveries resulting from basic and applied scientific research have had an enormous impact on

the Nation’s economy, the development of technology, the

creation of jobs and new industries, and the strength of

the Nation’s research and educational institutions;
2

•HCON 243 IH

Whereas Federal financial support for basic and applied scientific research has contributed significantly to making

the United States the superpower that it is today;

Whereas since 1988 Federal financial support for basic and

applied scientific research has dropped in constant dollars

by more than 2 percent annually;

Whereas the reduction in Federal financial support for basic

and applied scientific research threatens the Nation’s supremacy in science and technology, its wealth-producing

potential, its ability to educate researchers and scientists,

its national laboratories and research institutions, and its

global competitiveness; and

Whereas to ensure its leadership role in the world in the next

millennium the United States must not replace its scientific curiosity with idleness, or abdicate its role as a

discoverer and explorer of the unknown, or shift its attention from the wonderment of space to the dust of decline: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 Federal Government should—

4 (1) increase its financial support for basic and

5 applied scientific research in the United States;

6 (2) encourage the maintenance and growth of

7 basic and applied scientific research within the cor8 porate and industrial sectors of the economy of the

9 United States; and

10 (3) analyze, and where necessary, adjust the

11 Federal incentives with respect to basic and applied
3

•HCON 243 IH

1 scientific research to ensure the global competitive2 ness of the United States.

Æ
Exhibit 10.1

 

Description of the Second Extension to the $250 Million Secured Revolving Credit Agreement

 

November 23, 2017

 

Pursuant to the terms of the $250 million secured Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2015, between Consumers Energy Company and The Bank of Nova Scotia, the parties have all agreed, effective November 23, 2017, to extend the Termination Date (as defined therein) for a period of one year to November 22, 2019.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              Jan-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                Mar-31-1998
<CASH>                                      2,928,326
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               222,575
<ALLOWANCES>                                35,000
<INVENTORY>                                 48,807
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            3,285,632
<PP&E>                                      910,951
<DEPRECIATION>                              305,809
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              4,879,327
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       619,937
<BONDS>                                     0
<COMMON>                                    6,734
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 265
<OTHER-SE>                                  4,200,853
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                4,879,327
<SALES>                                     870,570
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            1,015,326
<CGS>                                       427,530
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               1,679,866
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            1,248,934
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          3,402
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (664,540)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                (664,540)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (.10)
        




</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                          MINDSPRING ENTERPRISES, INC.

                         EARNINGS PER SHARE CALCULATION




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            For the Quarter                       For the Nine Months      

                                                 Ended                                    Ended

                                September 30, 1995   September 30, 1996   September 30, 1995   September 30, 1996
                                ------------------   ------------------   ------------------   ------------------
<S>                                  <C>                  <C>                   <C>               <C>
Weighted Average Shares 
   Outstanding                       1,267,304             5,138,836            1,267,304          4,588,202

Common Stock Equivalents:

   Class A Convertible 
      Preferred Stock                1,187,895                     0 (A)        1,187,895                  0 (A)

   Class B Convertible 
      Preferred Stock                  645,594                     0 (A)          227,022                  0 (A)

   Class C Convertible 
      Preferred Stock                  100,000                     0 (B)          100,000                  0 (B)

   Stock Options:  Employee 
      and Director Plans               287,652                     0 (B)          287,652                  0 (B)
                                  -------------         -------------         ------------       ------------   
Total Shares for Primary Loss        3,488,445             5,138,836            3,069,873          4,588,202

Net Loss                              (389,277)           (2,701,700)            (651,212)        (5,200,913)
                                  -------------         -------------         ------------       ------------

Primary Loss Per Share                  ($0.11)               ($0.53)              ($0.21)            ($1.13)
                                  =============         =============         ============       ============
</TABLE>

(A)  Converted as part of the IPO and included in weighted average shares
     outstanding.
(B)  Excluded from calculation as antidilutive.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6968

KENNETH FRAZIER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ALTON BASKERVILLE, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-01-000-7)

Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 11, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Frazier, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Frazier seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. Frazier v. Baskerville, No. CA-01-000-7 (W.D.

Va. May 31, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 47 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 47

 Proposing an amendment to the Constitution to permit the Congress to 
 limit contributions and expenditures in elections for Federal office.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 25, 1996

 Mr. Bradley introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
          twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Proposing an amendment to the Constitution to permit the Congress to 
 limit contributions and expenditures in elections for Federal office.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years from the date of its submission by the Congress:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The Congress shall have the power to set limits on 
expenditures made by, in support of, or in opposition to the nomination 
or election of any person to Federal office.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to set limits on 
contributions by individuals or entities by, in support of, or in 
opposition to the nomination or election of any person to Federal 
office.
    ``Section 3. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by 
appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.''.
                                 <all>
```
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 18

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That the Architect of the Capitol is author3 ized and directed to transfer to the custody of the Chief

4 Justice of the United States the catafalque which is pres5 ently situated in the crypt beneath the rotunda of the Cap6 itol so that the said catafalque may be used in the Su7 preme Court Building in connection with services to be

8 conducted there for the late Honorable Warren Burger,

9 former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United

10 States.

Passed the Senate June 26 (legislative day, June

19), 1995.

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 18

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the Architect of the Capitol to transfer

neral service.the catafalque to the Supreme Court for a fu-
Exhibit 34.7



|     |  |                                                                                                                              
|---- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Plante & Moran, PLLC
10 South Riverside Plaza 9th Floor Chicago, IL 60606
Tel: 312.207.1040 Fax:
312.207.1066 plantemoran.com

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors

National Tax Search, LLC

We have examined National Tax Search, LLC (the Company) compliance with Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB Servicing
Criteria, set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Security and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for the National Tax Search TaxQ system (the Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015. The Company has determined
that only certain servicing criteria, 1112(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)1(iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii), are applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by
this report. The Company has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report.

Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements
assertion about the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included a selection of a
sample of transactions and compliance activities related to the Platform during the examination period and determining whether the Company processed those transactions and performed those activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Our
testing of selected transactions and compliance activities was limited to calculations, reports, and activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures did not include determining whether errors may have
occurred prior to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2015 for the Platform is fairly stated in all material respects.



/s/ Plante & Moran, PLCC


Chicago, IL

January 18, 2016



LOGO