alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

 

The undersigned, Sterling H.McDonald, Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of Evolution PetroleumCorporation (the “Company”), certifies in connection with the filing with theSecurities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, tohis knowledge, that:

 

1. The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this certification as of the 15th day of May, 2009.

 
|   | /s/ STERLING H. MCDONALD                   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   | Sterling H. McDonald                       |
|   | Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to EvolutionPetroleum Corporation and will be retained by Evolution Petroleum Corporationand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.  The foregoing certificate isbeing furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to thisForm 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.

 

----
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Jin Hu, the Chief Financial Officer of CHINA
TMK BATTERY SYSTEMS INC. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1. The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement
this 31st day of March, 2011.

/s/ Jin HuJin Hu Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to China TMK Battery Systems Inc. and will be retained by
China TMK Battery Systems Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (1)    | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                                   |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | (2)    | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the      dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company      for the periods presented. |

|                                        |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated:      December 29, 2008               |   |
|                                        |   |
| /s/      Thomas Massie                      |   |
| Thomas      Massie                          |   |
| Chief      Executive Officer & Director |   |
#### Roger Lee DEAL, Sr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Roy COOPER, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-7446

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 15, 2018

Decided: February 20, 2018

Roger Lee Deal, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Roger Lee Deal, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as successive, his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petitions. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2263(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2263(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a *249prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Deal has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauper-is, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the . appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
# Official Journal C 365/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 365 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6229 October 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 365

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6229 October 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2019/C 365/01 | Report on budgetary and financial management — Section I: European Parliament — Financial year 2018 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Parliament

2019/C 365/01

Report on budgetary and financial management — Section I: European Parliament — Financial year 2018

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

 

The undersigned, Sterling H.McDonald, Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of Evolution PetroleumCorporation (the “Company”), certifies in connection with the filing with theSecurities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:

 

1. The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this certification as of the 12th day of February, 2010.

 
|   | /s/ STERLING H. MCDONALD                    |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|   | Sterling H. McDonald                        |
|   | Vice-President and Chief  Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to EvolutionPetroleum Corporation and will be retained by Evolution Petroleum Corporationand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.  The foregoing certificate isbeing furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to thisForm 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.

 

----
**Exhibit 32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
 **18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In connection with the Amendment to the Quarterly Report of Biometrics 2000 Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the nine month period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph J. Turek, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Joseph J. Turek
 Joseph J. Turek
 Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
 (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
 November 19, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 52 Referred in House (RFH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 52

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 4, 1996

  Referred to the Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas many States have encouraged and facilitated the creation of senior 
        citizen legislative and advocacy bodies;
Whereas in creating such bodies such States have provided to many older 
        Americans the opportunity to express concerns, promote appropriate 
        interests, and advance the common good by influencing the legislation 
        and actions of State government; and
Whereas a National Silver Haired Congress, with representatives from each State, 
        would provide a national forum for a nonpartisan evaluation of 
        grassroots solutions to concerns shared by an increasing number of older 
        Americans: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the Congress hereby recognizes and encourages the convening of an 
annual National Silver Haired Congress in the District of Columbia.

            Passed the Senate August 2, 1996.

            Attest:

                                             KELLY D. JOHNSTON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 138 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 138

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

  To correct technical errors in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 2014.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 138

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 2014), to provide for 
reconciliation pursuant to subsections (b)(2) and (d) of section 105 of 
the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 1998, the Clerk 
of the House of Representatives shall make the following corrections:
            (1) In the amendment proposed to be added by section 
        1085(c), strike ``section 407(d)'' and insert ``paragraph (4) 
        or (7) of section 407(d)''.
            (2) Strike subparagraph (B) of section 1031(e)(2) and 
        insert the following:
                    ``(B) Treatment of amounts paid for tickets 
                purchased before october 1, 1997.--The amendments made 
                by subsection (c) shall not apply to amounts paid 
                before October 1, 1997; except that--
                            ``(i) the amendment made to section 4261(c) 
                        of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall 
                        apply to amounts paid more than 7 days after 
                        the date of the enactment of this Act for 
                        transportation beginning on or after October 1, 
                        1997, and
                            ``(ii) the amendment made to section 
                        4263(c) of such Code shall apply to the extent 
                        related to taxes imposed under the amendment 
                        made to such section 4261(c) on the amounts 
                        described in clause (i).''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 31, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN
NO. 03-0 9 -00 348 -CV
In re Joe A llen Holu bec, Jr.
OR IG IN A L PR OC E E D IN GFR OM WI L L IA MS ON C OU N T Y M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N J oe Allen Holube c, J r., has filed a pro se orig inal petition for wr it of habea s corpus seekingrelief

from sente nces imposed in ca use numbers 05-1107-K277 and 05-1134-K277 in the 227th District Court of Wi lliamson Count y . We dismi ss the petition for want of jurisdiction. Th is C ourt

ha s su c h ori g ina l jur isd ic tio n as may be pr e sc ri be d by law. Te x. Con st. art. 5, § 6. We may

issue the writ of ha

beas c orpus only when the restra int of liberty arises out of a civil ca se. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(d) (West 2004). This Court d oes not have orig inal habea s corpus jurisdiction in crim i n al law matter s. Ex parte Hawk ins , 885 S.W .2d 586, 588 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1994, orig . proce eding ). Ba sed on the allegations in t he petition, it appear s that Holubec must see k relief pursuant to ar

ticle 11.07. Tex . Code Crim. Proc. Ann. ar t. 11.07 (West Supp. 2008).2 The pe tition for writ of habe as cor pus is dism issed.

__________________________________________ J an P. Patterson, J ustice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Pember ton and Waldrop Filed: Jul y

2, 2009
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 8

Electing Elizabeth B. Greene, as the Secretary of the Majority of the Senate.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. DOLE submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Electing Elizabeth B. Greene, as the Secretary of the

Majority of the Senate.

1 Resolved, That Elizabeth B. Greene, of Virginia, be

2 and she is hereby elected Secretary for the Majority, be3 ginning January 4, 1995.

Æ
### Minor Technical Correction to USDA Feed Cost Data

After finalization of the waiver decision, USDA found a slight error in their feed cost data. The 2012/13 projected production of chickens (live weight slaughter basis) for Arkansas was miscalculated resulting in an underestimate of production by a factor of 4. The underestimate in chicken production, in turn, results in the understating of Arkansa s feed costs both with and without the mandate for chickens, total poultry, and total feed costs , compared to the estimates submitted to the docket for the 2012 RFS waiver decision . The national

- level estimates were not affected (they were calculated separ ately), nor were the estimates for any other state.

As noted, a higher production of chicken raises the estimated feed costs in an absolute sense; however, comparing the with and without mandate chicken feed costs , in a relative sense, remains the same because the methodology is increasing the with and without mandates across all scenarios by the same factor . As a consequence, the percentage impact of a waiver on Arkansas chicken feed costs remains the

same.
For the scenarios evaluated, the revision mad e for Arkansas chickens, raises Arkansas’ total poultry feed costs (chickens, turkeys, and eggs) and total feed costs (sum of poultry, cattle, hogs, and dairy feed costs), but does not materially alter the percentage impact of a waiver on Arkansas feed cos ts.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 22, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 16262]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06144]



[[Page 16262]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: March 30, 2022, at 9:00 a.m.

PLACE: Washington, DC.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

 Wednesday, March 30, 2022, at 9:00 a.m.

    1. Strategic Issues.
    2. Financial and Operational Issues.
    3. Executive Session.
    4. Administrative Items.
    General Counsel Certification: The General Counsel of the United 
States Postal Service has certified that the meeting may be closed 
under the Government in the Sunshine Act.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Michael J. Elston, Secretary of 
the Board of Governors, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW, 
Washington, DC 20260-1000. Telephone: (202) 268-4800.

Michael J. Elston,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-06144 Filed 3-18-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### William Lee JUDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kathy WILLIAMS, Housing Unit Manager at FCC Petersburg in Petersburg, VA; Ian Conner; Several Named but Unknown Search Team Members; Named but Unknown Regional Administrative Remedy Coordinator; Named but Unknown Institutional Administrative Remedy Coordinator; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-7340

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 30, 2018

Decided: February 2, 2018

William Lee Judy, Appellant Pro Se.

Sean Douglas Jansen, Kent Pendleton Porter, Assistant United States Attorneys, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appel-lees.

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Lee Judy seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing the United States, from his pending action brought under *Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics,*403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b)(1), 2671-2680 (2012). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 64(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 641, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Judy seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. *See Baird v. Palmer,*114 F.3d 39, 43 (4th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, we grant Defendants’ motion to dismiss and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this *177court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                                        <C>                   <C>         
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS                 6-MOS       
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997           MAR-31-1997 
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996           APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996           SEP-30-1996 
<CASH>                                     25,439                25,439      
<SECURITIES>                               14,274                14,274      
<RECEIVABLES>                              13,783                13,783      
<ALLOWANCES>                                  636                   636      
<INVENTORY>                                     0                     0      
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           53,990                53,990      
<PP&E>                                      8,380                 8,380      
<DEPRECIATION>                              3,277                 3,277      
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             59,343                59,343      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      14,776                14,776      
<BONDS>                                         0                     0      
<COMMON>                                      184                   184      
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0                     0      
<PREFERRED>                                     0                     0      
<OTHER-SE>                                 41,615                41,615      
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               59,343                59,343      
<SALES>                                    14,214                25,894      
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           14,214                25,894      
<CGS>                                       2,670                 5,186      
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               2,670                 5,186      
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0                     0      
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0                     0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             60                   127      
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             1,650                 1,975      
<INCOME-TAX>                                  205                   237      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         1,445                 1,738      
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0                     0      
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0                     0      
<CHANGES>                                       0                     0      
<NET-INCOME>                                1,445                 1,738      
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 .07                   .08      
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .07                   .08      
                                                             


</TABLE>