alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 169 Agreed to House (ATH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 169

            Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 8, 1997

  Mr. Armey submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
            Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, 
October 9, 1997, it stand adjourned until 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, 
October 21, 1997, or until noon on the second day after Members are 
notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses 
or adjourns at the close of business on Thursday, October 9, 1997, 
Friday, October 10, 1997, or Saturday, October 11, 1997, pursuant to a 
motion made by the Majority Leader, or his designee, in accordance with 
this concurrent resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon 
on Monday, October 20, 1997, or such time on that day as may be 
specified by the Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to 
recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after Members are 
notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, 
in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-9720.

#### Williams *v.*Wetzel, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
##### 



Exhibit 10.02
 MATRIXX INITIATIVES, INC.
 2001 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
RESTRICTED STOCK PROGRAM AGREEMENT
 Agreement Company  Grantee  Date of Grant
 RECITALS
 Plan
   NOW, THEREFORE
 1. GRANT OF RESTRICTED SHARES
 Restricted Shares Common Stock   Section 4.D
 2. RIGHTS OF GRANTEE
 Section 1




---



##### 



3. RESTRICTIONS ON RESTRICTED SHARES
 Section 4.A
 4. VESTING
 A. Vesting Schedule
 Section 4 Section 3
 B. Accelerated Vesting
 Section 4.A Exhibit 10.12
 C. Termination of Vesting; Cancellation of Restricted Shares
 Section 4.A Sections 4.A 4.B
 -2-




---



##### 



D. Issuance of Certificates
  5. SECURITIES ACT
 A. Registration
  B. Condition on Delivery of Stock
  6. REPRESENTATIONS OF GRANTEE
  A. Further Limitations on Disposition
  -3-




---



##### 



B. Determination of Fair Market Value
 Section 3.1
 C. Section83(b)Election
 Code Section 3
  7. NONTRANSFERABILITY OF AGREEMENT
  8. FEDERAL AND STATE TAXES
  -4-




---



##### 



9. ADJUSTMENT OF SHARES
 Article 11 Section 8
 10. AMENDMENT OF THIS AGREEMENT; TERMINATION
  11. GOVERNING LAW
  12. SEVERABILITY
  13. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
  -5-




---



##### 



MATRIXX INITIATIVES, INC.By:William J. HemeltExecutive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer GRANTEE:SignatureName -6-
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

J.P. Morgan Chase CommercialMortgage Securities Corp.

383 Madison Avenue

31st Floor

New York, New York 10179

 

Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2014-C24, CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-C24

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of October 1, 2014 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2587
JOHN TIMOTHY QUANDER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ARLINGTON COUNTY GOVERNMENT, Defendant - Appellee, and EDWARD P. PLAUGHER, Arlington County, Fire Chief; FLOYD WALTERS, SR., Battalion Chief, Manager; JOHN WHITE, Battalion Chief, Manager; KENNETH JOHNSON, Captain; ARLINGTON COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. W. Curtis Sewell, Magistrate Judge. (CA-98-459-A) Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 5, 1999 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.John Timothy Quander, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Harlan Maier, Assistant County Attorney, Arlington, Virginia, for Appellee.1 The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994). 2 Although the magistrate judge’s order is marked as “filed” on September 18, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on September 21, 1998. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the judgment or order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: John Timothy Quander appeals the magistrate judge’s ordergranting summary judgment to the Defendants on his employment discrimination action. 1 Our review of the record and the magistratejudge’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Quander v. Arlington County , No. CA-98-459-A (E.D. Va. Sept. 21, 1998). 2 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of September 1, 2014, by and among J.P. Morgan ChaseCommercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Master Servicer, CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as SpecialServicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator,Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, and Pentalpha SurveillanceLLC, as Senior Trust Advisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates Series 2014-C23 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized termsused herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in theAgreement. 

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of thisAgreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial MortgageServices do hereby certify that: 

 

1.            A review ofthe activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and 

 

2.            To the best ofmy knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all ofits obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017. 

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober 

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
TIMBERCO, INC. 1 of 2 Created on: 2012-01-11 F95-8-5-CBScopeListingTemplate-2009-4-14 

## CERTIFICATION BODY ACCREDITATION PROGRAM

Accredited Legal Entity :



## TIMBERCO, INC. (dba TECO)

1570 Matt Pass, Suite #2, Cottage Grove, WI 53527 U.S.A.

Telephone: (855) 266-8326 Fax: (608) 433-0063 Email: steve.verhey@tecotested.com

Any additional critical/key locations included in the scope of accreditation are appended to this listing.

Accreditation Standards:

CAN-P-3G (ISO/IEC Guide 65:1996)

CAN-P-1500M

IAF GD 5:2006

Certification Mark:

Product Certification System Type:

The product certification system operated by this organization most closely resembles that described by ISO/IEC Guide 67, Conformity assessment — Fundamentals of product certification , System 5. It includes the evaluation of samples requested by the certification body, determination of characteristics by testing or assessment, initial assessment of the production process or the quality system, as applicable, evaluation of the test and assessment reports, license, on-going surveillance by testing or inspection of samples from the factory or the open market, or both depending on the product type, as well as on-going surveillance of the production process or quality system or both.

Subject Areas of Accreditation:

The scope of accreditation for the above-mentioned legal entity limits the use of the certification mark shown, to products that meet standards classified by the following international classification coding:TIMBERCO, INC. 2 of 2 Created on: 2012-01-11 F95-8-5-CBScopeListingTemplate-2009-4-14

ICS No. Title Purpose 79.020 Wood technology processes Performance 79.040 Wood, sawlogs and sawn timber Performance 79.060.01 Wood-based panels in general Performance 79.060.10 Plywood Performance 79.060.20 Fibre and particle boards Performance 83.180 Adhesives Performance (in terms of wood products only)

91.080.20 Timber structures (Glued laminated timber) Performance

Other Critical/Key Locations

Refer to the legal entity location identified at the top of this listing. There are no additional locations included in this scope of accreditation:
#### UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Antonio Jose ALONZO Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-2261

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: January 24, 2018

Filed: January 29, 2018

Megan A. Healy, Christopher C. Myers, Brett M. Shasky, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of North Dakota, Fargo, ND, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Antonio Jose Alonzo, Pro Se

Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Antonio Jose Alonzo appeals from the district court’s1 order denying his motion *276for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Following de novo review, we agree with the district court that Alonzo was ineligible for the requested sentence reduction based on an amendment to the United States Sentencing Guidelines because his original sentence was derived from the applicable statutory minimum. See United States v. Moore, 734 F.3d 836, 837-38 (8th Cir. 2013). We affirm the judgment and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Ralph R, Erickson, then • United States District Judge for the District of North Dakota, now United States Circuit Judge.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The Information in this Financial Data schedule is unaudited and should be read
in conjunction with the Company's March 31, 1998 Form 10-QSB and December 31,
1997 Form 10-KSB.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,751
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          17,284
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,173
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                            36
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,404
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,173
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   555
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 112
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (667)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (667)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (667)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)
        

</TABLE>
### _D_ev_a_n.y-.. D_e_n_n_is ...

<Iooo0_S_T} .... 

# bOr ..**~s.**

# r·o

## UJo-z,.. 

# 141-13'3

, "r' , ,"**;~;** t/\\

### ;L';",] From: Sent: 

# To:-
.. Subject:
Gentlemen, Ipl132@aol.com Thursday, February04, 2010 1:28 PM Devany, Dennis (OST); Swanson, Brian (OST) EAS service for Plattsburgh NY

Ijustwanted to make you aware of the situation in Plattsburgh NY. I attended the legistaure meeting last nightto determan the EAS contract. I was applaud as to how this process was handled. VERY unprofessional, the legislatures would not hearthe interests of the local population. All they spoke about was the Canadian population wants larger aircraft. Correct me if im wrong, but the EAS program is paid for by us citizens and not Canadians. They are not working forthe interests of the local population, and will not get myvotes. Please take this into consideration, when making the,decision, and not go with the Clinton Co. legislatures decision. If you are interested in how the local population is commenting, please go to Pressrepublican.com click on the story "county picks colgan air" and scroll down to the comments section. Thank you for taking the time to read this PWallace Cadyville NY 12918

1
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

 

The undersigned, Sterling H. McDonald, Vice-Presidentand Chief Financial Officer of Evolution Petroleum Corporation (the “Company”),certifies in connection with the filing with the Securities and ExchangeCommission of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, tohis knowledge, that:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed thiscertification as of the 14th day of November, 2008.

 
|        | /s/ STERLING H. MCDONALD                   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   | Sterling H. McDonald                       |
|   | Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Evolution Petroleum Corporation andwill be retained by Evolution Petroleum Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certificate is being furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to this Form 10-Qand shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.

 

----
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 7- 30 66

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e

v.
W il li am Henr y Adk in s
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e So ut he rn Dis tri ct of I owa - Co un ci l Bl uf fs

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: May 11, 2 01 8 Fi le d: May 24, 2 01 8 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re LOKEN, COLLO TON, and ERICKSON, Ci rcu it Ju dg es

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

W il li am Adk in s di rect ly ap pe al s th e jud gm en t en te red by th e di st ric t co ur t 1 aft er he was co nv ic te d up on a jury ve r d i c t of dr ug an d fir earm ch arg es , an d was

The Hon or ab le Reb ecca Goo dg am e Ebi ng er, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r 1 th e So ut he rn Dis tri ct of I owa

.se nt en ced to a to ta l of 36 0 m on th s in pr is on

. His co un se l ha s m ov ed to wit hd raw, an d

ha s f i l e d a b r i e f un de r And ers v. Cal ifo rn ia , 38 6 U.S. 73 8 (1 96 7) , ch al le ng in g th e ad m is si on at tri al of ev id en ce rel at ed to a pr io r co nv ic t i o n , t h e s uf fic ie nc y of th e
ev id en ce t o s up po rt t he jury ve rd ic t, an d t he reas on ab le ne ss of Ad ki ns ’s sen te nc e.

W e co nc lu de th at th e di st ric t co ur t di d no t ab us e it s di sc ret io n in ad m it ti ng th e pr io r-co nv ic ti on ev id en ce in li gh t of it s rel ev an ce to th e m at eri al is su es of Adk in s’s kn owl ed ge , in te nt , an d ab se nc e of m is ta ke

. See Uni te d St at es v. Cl ark , 66 8 F.3 d 56 8, 57 4- 75 (8 th Ci r. 20 12 ) (fi nd in g no ab us e of di sc ret io n in ad m is si on of Fed eral Ru le of Evi de nc e 40 4( b) ev id en ce th at was rel ev an t to m at eri al is su e in cas e). W e fu rth er
c o nc lu de th at th ere was su ffi ci en t ev id en ce to su pp or t th e jury v erd ic t. See Un i t e d St at es v. Bi rd in e, 51 5 F.3 d 84 2, 84 4 (8 th Ci r. 20 08 ) (s uf fic ie nc y of ev i d e n c e to

su st ai n co nv ic ti on is rev ie wed de no vo ); Uni te d St at es v. Sp ears , 45 4 F.3 d 83 0, 83 2 (8 th Ci r. 20 06 ) (th is co ur t wil l rev ers e on ly if no reas on ab le jury co ul d ha ve fo un d de fen da nt gu il ty be y on d reas on ab le do ub t). In ad di ti on , we co nc lu de th at th e di st ric t

co ur t di d no t im

po se an un reas on ab le se nt en ce. See Uni te d Stat es v. Feem st er, 572 F.3 d 45 5, 46 1- 62 (8 th Ci r. 20 09 ) (en ba nc ) (re vi ewin g se nt en ce un de r de fere nt ia l ab us e-o f-d is cret io n s ta nd ard ; d is cu ss in g s ub st an ti ve reas on ab le ne ss ).

Hav in g in de pe nd en tl y re v i e w e d th e reco rd pu rs ua nt to Pen so n v. Ohi o, 48 8 U.S. 75 (1 98 8) , we fin d no no nf riv ol ou s is su e. Acco rd in gl y , we gr an t c ou ns el ’s

m ot io n t o wi th dr aw, an d we a ffi rm

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
----

            COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 1338/2006

of 8 September 2006         

imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of chamois leather originating in the People's Republic of China

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (1) of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community, (the basic Regulation) and in particular Article 9 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee,

Whereas:

A.   PROVISIONAL MEASURES

B.   SUBSEQUENT PROCEDURE

C.   PRODUCT CONCERNED AND LIKE PRODUCT

D.   DUMPING

1.   Normal value

2.   Export price

3.   Comparison

4.   Dumping margin

E.   INJURY

1.   Community production

2.   Definition of the Community industry

3.   Community consumption

4.   Volume of the imports from the country concerned and market share

5.   Economic situation of the Community industry

6.   Conclusion on injury

F.   CAUSATION

1.   Effects of the dumped imports

2.   Effects of other factors

G.   COMMUNITY INTEREST

H.   DEFINITIVE ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES

I.   DEFINITIVE COLLECTION OF THE PROVISIONAL DUTY

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of chamois leather and combination chamois leather, whether or not cut to shape, including crust chamois leather and combination crust chamois leather originating in the People's Republic of China, falling within CN codes 4114 10 10 and 4114 10 90.

2.   The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty, for products produced by all companies in the People's Republic of China shall be 58,9 %.

3.   Unless otherwise specified, the provisions in force concerning customs duties shall apply.

Article 2

Amounts secured by way of the provisional anti-dumping duty pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 439/2006 on imports of chamois leather originating in the People's Republic of China shall be definitively collected at the rate of the definitive duty imposed pursuant to Article 1. The amounts secured in excess of the amount of the definitive duty shall be released.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 September 2006.

For the Council

The President

E. TUOMIOJA            

----

(1)OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2117/2005 (OJ L 340, 23.12.2005, p. 17).

(2)OJ L 80, 17.3.2006, p. 7.

----