alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

The undersigned, Lihui Song, theChief Executive Officer of GOLDEN ELEPHANT GLASS TECHNOLOGY, INC. (the"Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that: 

1.     TheCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008(the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2.    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of theundersigned has executed this statement this 14th day of November, 2008. 

|   | /s/ Lihui Song                                                           |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Lihui Song     Chief Executive Officer     (Principal Executive Officer) |

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Golden Elephant Glass Technology, Inc. and willbe retained by Golden Elephant Glass Technology, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

The forgoing certification is being furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It isnot being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofthe Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of anygeneral incorporation language in such filing. 

----
Comment Info: ================= General Comment:FAA-2013-1027; Dir ID 2013-NM-121-AD
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mikel Walters, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Mailstop F-63, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, Telephone (404) 639-0913,                         *MWalters@cdc.gov.*

                        The Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Kalwant Smagh,

Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2022-05749 Filed 3-17-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                    5
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                               Jan-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 Sep-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,827,170
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                175,969
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                  59,751
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,130,878
<PP&E>                                       1,650,377
<DEPRECIATION>                               457,718
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,666,170
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        616,417
<BONDS>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     1,154
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,940,125
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,666,170
<SALES>                                      1,786,583
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,100,066
<CGS>                                        1,052,944
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,099,552
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,013,432
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           33,176
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1,999,486)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          0
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1,999,486)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (1.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (1.97)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer of Barclay Road, Inc.(the
      "Company") hereby certifies
      that, to his knowledge, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
      ended December 31, 2006, filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
      Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), fully complies with the requirements of
      Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
      information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





This
      written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      as an exhibit to such Form
      10-K. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
      been provided to Barclay Road, Inc.and will be retained by Barclay Road, Inc.and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.





Date:
      March 29, 2007





/s/
      HERBERT L. BECKER


Herbert
      L. Becker


*President
      and Chief Executive Officer*
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TUAN A. VU, AKA Chico, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-30223

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 8, 2017 * Seattle, Washington

Filed December 14, 2017

Helen J. Brunner, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Vincent Thomas Lombardi, II, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Charlene Koski, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Sarah Kate Vaughan, Assistant U.S. Attorney, DOJ-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Tuan A, Vu, Pro Se

Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Defendant Yuan Vu (“Vu”) appeals his conviction for multiple counts of possession, distribution, and conspiracy to distribute controlled substances following a nine-day jury trial. Pursuant to *Anders v.*
      *406
      *California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Vu has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Vu has also filed a pro se supplemental brief in which he largely challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and, in particular, the credibility of a co-defendant who testified against him. No government brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no meritorious issues for appeal. We have also considered the arguments asserted in Vu’s pro se supplement brief and find them to be without merit.' The jury was given the opportunity to judge the credibility of witnesses, and when reviewing for sufficiency of the evidence, we are required to view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution. *See Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 54 (Monday, March 21, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15911-15912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05856]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security


Emerging Technology Technical Advisory Committee; Notice of 
Partially Closed Meeting

    The Emerging Technology Technical Advisory Committee (ETTAC) will 
meet on April 8, 2022, at 11 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time. The meeting 
will be available via teleconference. The Committee advises the Office 
of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration on the 
identification of emerging and foundational technologies with potential 
dual-use applications as early as possible in their developmental 
stages both within the United States and abroad.

Agenda

Open Session

    1. Welcome and Introductions.
    2. Introduction by the Bureau of Industry and Security Leadership.
    3. Presentation: Bringing the Chipmakers Home--Attracting 
Manufactures and the Talent to Sustain Them. Questions and Answers.
    4. Public Comments/Announcements.

Closed Session

    5. Discussion of matters determined to be exempt from the 
provisions relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. App. 10(a)(1) 
and 10(a)(3).
    The open session will be accessible via teleconference. To join the 
conference, submit inquiries to Ms. Yvette Springer at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0e57786b7a7a6b205d7e7c6760696b7c4e6c677d206a616d20696178"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="08517e6d7c7c6d265b787a61666f6d7a486a617b266c676b266f677e">[email protected]</span></a> no later than April 1, 2022.
    To the extent time permits, members of the public may present oral 
statements to the Committee. The public

[[Page 15912]]

may submit written statements at any time before or after the meeting. 
However, to facilitate distribution of public presentation materials to 
Committee members, the Committee suggests that presenters forward the 
public presentation materials prior to the meeting to Ms. Springer via 
email.
    The Assistant Secretary for Administration, with the concurrence of 
the delegate of the General Counsel, formally determined on February 1, 
2022, pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 
as amended (5 U.S.C. App. 10(d)), that the portion of the meeting 
dealing with pre-decisional changes to the Commerce Control List and 
the U.S. export control policies shall be exempt from the provisions 
relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. App. 10(a)(1) and 
10(a)(3). The remaining portions of the meeting will be open to the 
public.
    For more information, please contact Yvette Springer via email.

Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-05856 Filed 3-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JT-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Sl()-1()()3()9-()19 

THE CITY O F 

BENTONVILLE 

March 2,2010 

The Honorable Raymond H. LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Docicet DOT-OST-2010-0034 

Dear Mr. Secretary: 

Thank you for the opportunity to express my support for the application for antitrust immunity and 

proposed joint business agreement filed by American Airlines and Japan Airlines. The proposed alliance 

between these two airlines is vital for the oneworld alliance to compete effectively with the Star and 

SkyTeam alliances. This increased alliance competition will in turn enhance the benefits of the 

Department's Open Skies policy - first by solidifying U.S. - Japan Open Skies, then by serving as a 

foundation for further liberalization across Asia. 

After a thorough review, I encourage the Department of Transportation to approve this application as it 

would enable these oneworld alliance airlines to work closely together to deliver highly competitive air 

transportation services. Approval for AA/JAL alliance will have a positive impact on air travel by offering 

customers more service, scheduling and pricing options and will help to ensure that customers continue 

to benefit from the competition afforded by three competitive air alliances. 

I urge you to quickly approve this application. 

Sincerely, 

Bob McCaslin 

Mayor, City of Bentonville 

117 W. CENTRAL AVE. • BENTONVILLE, AR 72712 • (479) 271 -3112 

• www.bentonvillear.com • 

•iS ^
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Annual Report of Barclay Road, Inc., a Wyoming corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Eduardo Valero Erana, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Eduardo Valero EranaEduardo Valero Erana, Chief Executive Officer

July 6, 2011
EXHIBIT 31.1

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
                  UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:
1. I have  reviewed  this  report  on Form  10-K and all  reports  on Form  10-D
   required to be filed in respect of the period  covered by this report on Form
   10-K of RAMP Series 2006-RS6 Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");
2. Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic reports,  taken as a whole,
   do not contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
   material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
   circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not  misleading  with
   respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  all  of  the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
   information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
   this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicers and
   based on my knowledge and the compliance  reviews  conducted in preparing the
   servicer  compliance  statements  required in this report  under Item 1123 of
   Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,
   the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
   in all material respects; and
5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance  with  servicing  criteria for
   asset-backed  securities and their related  attestation reports on assessment
   of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
   be included in this report in accordance  with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
   Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
   report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
   of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
   on Form 10-K.

   In giving the  certifications  above, I have reasonably relied on information
   provided  to  me  by  the  following   unaffiliated   parties:  PHH  Mortgage
   Corporation, SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association.


Date:  March 26, 2007

By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      --------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title: Managing Director
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 26, 2012 

p0319 

Order 

 

March 26, 2012 

144202 

DONITA NUGENT, Personal Representative 

of the Estate of KENNETH ST. ONGE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 144202 

 COA: 299255 

Presque Isle CC: 10-083445-DO 

NANCY ST. ONGE, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 25, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Charles G. KINNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLERK OF CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEAL, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three, acting in an administrative capacity; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-55081

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed December 28, 2017

Charles G. Kinney, Pro Se

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument, See Fed. R. App, P. 34(a)(2). Kinney's request for oral argument, set forth in the opening brief, is denied.

MEMORANDUM **

Charles G. Kinney appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his action alleging constitutional claims arising from state court proceedings. We have jurisdiction' under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a sua sponte dismissal for failure to state a claim. *Barrett v. Belleque,*544 F.3d 1060, 1061 (9th Cir. 2008). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Kinney’s action on the basis of judicial *421immunity and quasi-judicial immunity. *See Duvall v. County of Kitsap,*260 F.3d 1124, 1133 (9th Cir. 2001) (describing factors relevant to whether an act is judicial in nature and subject to judicial immunity); *Mullis v. U.S. Bankr. Court,*828 F.2d 1385, 1390 (9th Cir. 1987) (court clerks have absolute quasi-judicial immunity from damages for civil rights violations when they perform tasks that are an integral part of the judicial process, including taking actions necessary to commence an action); see also *Sparling v. Hoffman Constr. Co.,*864 F.2d 635, 637-38 (9th Cir. 1988) (court may sua sponte dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim without notice or an opportunity to respond when plaintiff cannot possibly win relief).

To the extent that Kinney seeks an order directing defendants to docket his appeal, this court lacks jurisdiction to issue such an order. *See Demos v. U.S. Dist. Court For E. Dist. of Wash.,*925 F.2d 1160, 1161-62 (9th Cir. 1991) (order) (federal courts lack jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus to state courts).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the complaint without leave to amend because amendment would be futile. *Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.,*656 F.3d 1034, 1041 (9th Cir. 2011) (setting forth standard of review and explaining that dismissal without leave to amend is proper when amendment would be futile).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Kinney’s motion to vacate or reconsider because Kinney failed to demonstrate any basis for reconsideration. *See Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc.,*5 F.3d 1255, 1262-63 (9th Cir. 1993) (setting forth standard of review and grounds for reconsideration).

We reject as unsupported by the record Kinney’s contention that the district judge was biased.

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### Stuart P. ADLER, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY; Michael Rao, Ph.D., in his official capacity; Jerome Strauss, III, M.D. in his official and individual capacity; Elizabeth Ripley, M.D. in her individual capacity, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-1686

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 14, 2017

Decided: January 19, 2018

Tim Schulte, Blackwell N. Shelly, Jr., Richmond, Virginia; Timothy E. Cupp, SHELLEY CUPP SCHULTE, PC, Harri-sonburg, Virginia, for Appellant. Kevin D. Holden, Crystal L. Tyler, JACKSON LEWIS P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Ap-pellees.

Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Stuart P. Adler, M.D., appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants summary judgment on his: (1) age discrimination and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634 (West 2008 & Supp. 2017); (2) claims alleging Defendants violated his due process rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments; and (3) defamation claims. We have reviewed the record and considered the parties’ arguments and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Adler v. Va. Commonwealth Univ.,*259 F.Supp.3d 395 (E.D. Va. 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the . materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-15-00069- CV Charles R. Randy Turner, Appellan t

v. Aquap lex, Inc. and Jame s Edw ard Jones, Jr., Appellees

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 126 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GN-0 3-0 0428 7, H ONO RAB LE DARLENE BY RNE, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Charles R. Randy Turner has filed a motion to dismiss this ap p eal. He
cer tifies that he has confe rre d with all parties and there is no opposition to the motion. Acc ording ly , we g rant the motion and dismiss the appea l. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) (1).

__________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Jus tice Be fore Chief J ustice Rose, Jus tices Goodwin a nd Field Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: F ebrua

ry 20, 2015