alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

MARK ROBERT STEFFEN,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 13-50286

D.C. No. 2:08-cr-01157-MWF

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 12, 2014** 

Before: McKEOWN, WARDLAW, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Mark Robert Steffen appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Steffen contends that the district court erred by relying on improper factors

FILED

JUN 17 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
in making its sentencing decision. We review for plain error, see United States v.

Hammons, 558 F.3d 1100, 1103 (9th Cir. 2009), and find none. The record reflects

that the district court properly considered the relevant sentencing factors specified

in 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) and did not impose the sentence on the basis of any

improper factor. See United States v. Miqbel, 444 F.3d 1173, 1181-82 (9th Cir.

2006).

Steffen also contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. The

district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Steffen’s sentence. See Gall

v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The 24-month sentence is substantively

reasonable in light of the section 3583(e) sentencing factors and the totality of the

circumstances, including Steffen’s breach of trust and the need to deter. See id.;

Miqbel, 444 F.3d at 1182. 

Finally, we reject Steffen’s contention that the district court breached a

promise made at a previous sentencing hearing.

AFFIRMED.

2 13-50286
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the amended Annual Report of Aquamer Medical Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "
Report"), I, Edwin A. Reilly,
President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.




Date:
December 3, 2010




/s/ James
      A. ShanahanJames
      A. Shanahan,
                  
                  Chief
      Financial Officer
                  (Principal Financial Officer and
                  Principal Accounting
Officer)
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 134

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 17, 1997

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol to allow

Members of Congress to greet and receive His All Holiness Patriarch Bartholomew.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That the rotunda of the Capitol is authorized

3 to be used on October 21, 1997, from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00

4 noon, for a ceremony to allow Members of Congress to

5 greet and receive His All Holiness Patriarch Bartholomew,
2

HCON 134 RDS

1 the 270th Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople. Phys2 ical preparations for the conduct of the ceremony shall be

3 carried out in accordance with such conditions as may be

4 prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol.

Passed the House of Representatives September 16,

1997.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6319 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6319

To absolve debts resulting from the payment of certain recruitment and 
 reenlistment bonuses to members of the California National Guard, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 15, 2016

Mr. Garamendi introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To absolve debts resulting from the payment of certain recruitment and 
 reenlistment bonuses to members of the California National Guard, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Guard Pay Integrity Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATIONS ON RECOUPMENT OF CERTAIN RECRUITING AND 
              REENLISTMENT BONUSES PAID TO MEMBERS OF THE CALIFORNIA 
              NATIONAL GUARD.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, except 
as provided in subsection (a), the Secretary concerned (as such term is 
defined in section 101(5) of title 37, United States Code) shall--
            (1) absolve any debt resulting from any bonus, incentive 
        pay, or similar benefit (or of any interest associated with 
        such a bonus, incentive pay, or similar benefit) that was paid 
        to a member of the California National Guard for recruitment or 
        reenlistment during fiscal years 2004 through 2010; and
            (2) refund to any person who has repaid to the United 
        States all or part of any such bonus, incentive pay, or similar 
        benefit (including any interest accrued on such bonus, 
        incentive pay, or similar benefit) the amount such person 
        repaid to the United States.
    (b) Exception.--Subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to a 
debt resulting from any bonus, incentive pay, or similar benefit that 
the Secretary concerned determines was paid under circumstances 
involving fraud or misrepresentation on the part of the member of the 
California National Guard to whom it was paid.
    (c) Student Loan Payments.--In this section, the term ``similar 
benefit'' includes any student loan payment or repayment.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered February 4 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 00429
- CR NATISHA MORGAN, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F
- 1271566
- K



### O RDER
The Court GRANTS appellant’s January 30, 2015 motion to supplement the record. We
ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a copy of appellant’s pro se notice of appeal that bears the April 7, 2014 file

- stamp from this Court and the August 20, 2014 file

- stamp of the Dallas County District Clerk.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Felici a Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk, and to counsel for all parties.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 281

To authorize representation by Senate Legal Counsel.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 18, 1996

Mr. DASCHLE submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize representation by Senate Legal Counsel.

Whereas, in the case of James Lockhart v. United States, et

al., No. C95–1858Z, pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, the

plaintiff has named Senator Trent Lott and former Senator Robert J. Dole as defendants; and

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the

Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a)

and 288c(a)(1)(1994)), the Senate may direct its counsel

to defend its Members in civil actions relating to their official responsibilities: Now, therefore, be it
2

SRES 281 ATS

1 Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is author2 ized to represent Senator Lott and former Senator Dole

3 in the case of James Lockhart v. United States, et al.

Æ
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 782 

To eliminate the sequestration under section 251A of the Balanced Budget 

and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2015 

Mr. CONYERS (for himself, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Mr. VARGAS, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, 

Ms. MOORE, Mr. MCGOVERN, Ms. MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM of New 

Mexico, Ms. WILSON of Florida, Mr. ELLISON, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. 

POCAN, and Mr. GRIJALVA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Budget 

A BILL 

To eliminate the sequestration under section 251A of the 

Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act 

of 1985, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cancel the Sequester 

5 Act of 2015’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 782 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF 251A SEQUESTRATION. 

2 Section 251A of the Balanced Budget and Emer3 gency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 901a) is re4 pealed. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                --------------



                                CERTIFICATIONS
                                --------------

I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


      1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
            10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
            report on Form 10-K of Alternative Loan Trust 2006-40T1 (the
            "Exchange Act periodic reports");

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as
            a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
            omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
            made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
            were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
            this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
            other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the
            period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act
            periodic reports;

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
            conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s)
            required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and
            except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the
            servicer(s) have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
            agreement(s) in all material respects; and

      5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
            criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
            reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
            asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
            accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
            13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
            except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
            instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
            disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
      information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
      Bank of New York, as Trustee.

Date: March 27, 2007


      /s/ Steve Bailey
      -----------------------
      Steve Bailey
      Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
EX-33 (c)
(logo) REGULUS


Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria

1. Pursuant to Subpart 229.1100 - Asset Backed Securities, 17 C.F.R. section
   229. 1100-229.1123 ("Regulation AB"), Regulus Group LLC, for itself and its
   wholly-owned subsidiaries (individually and collectively "Regulus"), is
   responsible for assessing its compliance with the servicing criteria
   applicable to the remittance processing services it provides to customers who
   are issuers or servicers of asset backed securities transactions and who have
   requested confirmation of Regulus' compliance in connection with loan and/or
   receivables portfolios that include pool assets for asset backed securities
   transactions (the "Platform"). Remittance processing is a service whereby
   check payments that are remitted by mail to a post office box are collected,
   processed through a highly automated data capture system, and prepared for
   deposit to a bank account held by the beneficiary of the payment.

2. The servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB were used
   in Regulus' assessment of compliance. Regulus has concluded that the
   servicing criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of
   Regulation AB are applicable to the servicing activities it performs with
   respect to the Platform (such criteria the "Applicable Servicing Criteria").
   Regulus has concluded that the remainder of the servicing criteria set forth
   in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are inapplicable to the activities it
   performs with respect to the Platform because Regulus does not participate in
   the servicing activities referenced by such servicing criteria.

3. As of and for the year ending December 31, 2006, Regulus has complied in all
   material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria set forth in Item
   1122(d) of Regulation AB.

4. KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
   report on Regulus' assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing
   Criteria as of and for the year ending December 31, 2006. A copy of that
   attestation report is attached hereto as Exhibit A.


/s/ Kimberlee Clark
Kimberlee Clark
Chief Financial Officer

February 22, 2007


860 LATOUR COURT | NAPA, CA | 94558 | TEL: 707.254.4000 | FAX: 707.254.4070
| REGULU5GROUP.COM
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 223

To commemorate the sesquicentennial of Texas statehood.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 1, 1996

Mrs. HUTCHISON (for herself and Mr. GRAMM) submitted the following

resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To commemorate the sesquicentennial of Texas statehood.

Whereas 1995 marks 150 years since the United States of

America admitted Texas as the 28th State in the Union;

Whereas the sesquicentennial of Texas statehood is a truly

momentous occasion that allows all Texans to reflect on

their State’s proud heritage and bright future;

Whereas acting on the advice of President John Tyler, the

United States Congress adopted a joint resolution on

February 28, 1845, inviting the Republic of Texas to

enter the Union as a State with full retention of its public lands; today, a century and a half later, Texas enjoys

the distinction of being the only State admitted with such

extensive rights;

Whereas the citizens of the Republic of Texas were deeply

committed to the goals and ideals embodied in the United
2

•SRES 223 ATS

States Constitution, and, on June 16, 1845, the Congress

of the Republic of Texas was convened by President

Anson Jones to consider the proposal of statehood;

Whereas Texas took advantage of the offer, choosing to unite

with a large and prosperous Nation that could more effectively defend the borders of Texas and expand its

flourishing trade with European countries; by October

1845, the Congress of the Republic of Texas had approved a State constitution, charting a bold new destiny

for the Lone Star State;

Whereas the proposed State constitution was sent to Washington, D.C., and on December 29, 1845, the United

States of America formally welcomed Texas as a new

State; the transfer of governmental authority, however,

was not complete until February 19, 1846, when Anson

Jones lowered the flag that had flown above the Capitol

for nearly 10 years and stepped down from his position

as president of the Republic of Texas; and

Whereas with the poignant retirement of the flag of the Republic, Texas emerged as a blazing Lone Star in America’s firmament, taking its place as the 28th State admitted into the Union: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) commemorate the sesquicentennial of Texas

3 statehood; and

4 (2) encourage all Texans to observe such day

5 with appropriate ceremonies and activities on this

6 historic occasion.

7 The Secretary of the Senate shall transmit a copy of this

8 resolution to the Texas Congressional Delegation, to the
3

•SRES 223 ATS

1 Governor of Texas, to the National Archives, and to the

2 Texas Archives.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 724 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 724

 To amend title I of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to 
    impose restrictions on the risk corridor program, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2015

  Mr. Lance (for himself and Mrs. Blackburn) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title I of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to 
    impose restrictions on the risk corridor program, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Taxpayer Bailout Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. RESTRICTIONS ON PPACA RISK CORRIDOR PROGRAM.

    Section 1342(b) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 
(42 U.S.C. 18062(b)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``The Secretary'' and 
        inserting ``Subject to paragraph (3), the Secretary''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) Safeguard to protect taxpayers.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Secretary shall ensure that 
                the amount of payments to plans under paragraph (1) for 
                a plan year beginning during calendar year 2014, 2015, 
                or 2016 does not exceed the amount of payments to the 
                Secretary under paragraph (2) for such plan year.
                    ``(B) Adjustment to protect taxpayers.--The 
                Secretary shall proportionately decrease the amount of 
                payments to plans under paragraph (1) in order to 
                ensure that the requirement of subparagraph (A) is 
                satisfied each year.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
      31.1




CERTIFICATION





I,
      Yu Kwai
      Chong, certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Fuqi International, Inc.;





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;





4.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





a.
      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b.
      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and




c.
      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
      quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a.
      All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and





b.
      Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.








/s/
      Yu Kwai Chong





Yu Kwai
      Chong


Chief
      Executive Officer and President


April
      17,
      2007