alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned, Sterling H. McDonald, Chief Financial Officer of Natural Gas
Systems, Inc. (the "Company"), certifies in connection with the filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report")") pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
and for the periods covered in the Report.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
14th day of November 2005.


                                /s/ STERLING H. MCDONALD
                                -----------------------
                                Sterling H. McDonald
                                Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Natural Gas Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Natural Gas
Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request. The foregoing certificate is being furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to this Form 10-QSB and shall
not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-QSB.
EXHIBIT 31



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED



I, Joseph R. Rozelle, certify that:



1.   I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Pan Asian Corporation;



2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  February 15, 2010



/s/    Joseph R. Rozelle

------------------------------------

Joseph R. Rozelle

Principal Executive Officer

and Principal Financial Officer
1 

### Ogulei, David

From: Damico, Genevieve Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 4:30 PM To: doug.harris@veoliaes.com Cc: dennis.warchol@veoliaes.com; nancy.paddock@veoliaes .com; Michael.Reed@illinois.gov; ray.pilapil@illinois.gov; Armitage, Julie Subject: Preliminary Draft Title V Renewal Permit Attachments: Veolia Renewal Title V Permit 9-10-14.docx; Veolia Renewal Statement of Basis 9-10-14.docx

Doug:

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has review ed Veolia’s April 8 and August 16, 2013 application for renewal of its Clean Air Act Title V Permit No. V-IL-1716300103-08-01. Attached are a preliminary draft permit and statement of basis for the renewal permi t. EPA is offering you an opportunity to review th ese documents and to voice any specific concerns with t he preliminary draft permit and statement of basis prior to EPA’s issuance of a draft permit for public comment period pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 71.11(a)(5).

Please submit any comments on the preliminary draft permit by October 3, 2014 . In addition, by this email, EPA is inviting you to meet with us by September 30, 2014 , to discuss any concerns you may have on the preliminary draft permit. Please contact me or Dav id Ogulei at (312) 353-0987, to set up this meeting

. Please note that this communication does not repres ent a final Agency action to issue or deny a permit to Veolia under Title V of the Act, or any other kind of final agency action under section 307(b) of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7607(b). A final decision on your applica tion will be made after consideration of all releva nt comments received during the public comment period.

Please contact me with any questions.

Genevieve Damico Chief Air Permit Section
Exhibit 10.1


 


 





THIRD AMENDMENT
TO SERVICES AGREEMENT


THIS AGREEMENT (this
“Agreement”) is made as of November 20, 2017 (the “Effective Date”) by and between JLS Ventures, LLC,
a Puerto Rico limited liability company (“JLS”) and ImmuDyne, Inc., a
corporation with a place of business 50 Spring Meadow Road, Mt. Kisco, NY 10549 (“Company”).


WHEREAS,
the Parties entered into the Services Agreement dated April 1, 2016, the First Amendment To Services Agreement dated December 31,
2016, the Second Amendment To Services Agreement dated July 1, 2017 and now the Parties desire to enter into this separate extension
Third Amendment to Services Agreement for the mutual benefit of the Parties;


NOW THEREFORE,
for good and valuable consideration, the following terms and conditions of the Services Agreement are amended:


1. All dates to
perform the services and to rescind the shares are extended by two years.


2. The terms of
the Agreement are extended by two years.


All other terms
of the Services Agreement, the First Amendment to the Services Agreement, and the Second Amendment to the Services Agreement remain
in effect.


This Agreement
may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all such counterparts shall together constitute
one and the same document. This Agreement may be executed via facsimile or electronic signature, and each such facsimile copy,
electronic signature or counterpart shall be deemed an original.


The parties
represent and warrant that, on the date first written above, they are authorized to enter into this Agreement in its entirety and
duly bind their respective principals by their signatures below.


EXECUTED as of
the date first written above.


 


	JLS Ventures, LLC (“JLS”)	Immudyne, Inc. (“Company”)
	
         

         

        By: /s/ Justin Schreiber

         

         

        Title: President

         

        Date signed: 11/20/2017

         
	
         

         

        By: /s/ Mark McLaughlin

         

         

        Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

         

        Date signed: 11/20/2017
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of LoralSpace & Communications Ltd. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Bernard L. Schwartz,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Bernard L. Schwartz           Bernard L. Schwartz *Chief Executive Officer*May 9, 2005
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

EXHIBIT 10.19    
  


 
 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE LEASE BETWEEN
  Research Interchange One, L.P. as Landlord and
  Testchip Technologies, Inc. as Tenant
  For the Premises at 9300 United Drive, Suite 180, Austin, Texas
  Dated
November 17, 2000    
  


        This amendment to the Lease for the Premises at 9300 United Drive, Suite 180, Austin, Texas, dated November 17, 2000, (the "Lease") and amended by First
Amendment on March 28, 2001 by and between Research Interchange One, L. P. a Texas Limited Partnership (the "Landlord"), and Testchip Technologies, Inc., (the "Tenant") is made and
entered into between Landlord and Tenant as of the sixth day of June, 2001. 


WITNESSETH  


        WHEREAS, expenses incurred by Landlord for the build-out of Tenant's improvements were less than the
$703,920.00 Allowance called for in Exhibit G of the Lease. 


        WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant desire to amend the Lease with respect to the Base Rental called for in Exhibit D of the Lease as a
result of Landlord spending $13,930.01 less than the Allowance under the formula contained in Exhibit G for such purpose. 


        NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant agree as follows: 



        1.    Defined Terms.    Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms used herein and defined in the Lease shall
be used herein as so defined in the Lease. 


        2.    Amended Provisions.    All terms and conditions of the Lease shall remain the same except that the Base Rental
shall change for the months shown below: 



	 
	 	New Monthly Base Rental

	June 1, 2001 to February 29, 2004	 	$	32,121.00
	March 1, 2004 to February 28, 2006	 	$	35,365.00






        3.    Further Amendment.    Should additional expenses applicable to Landlord's Allowance be paid by Landlord, further
adjustments will be made under the adjustment provision of Exhibit G of the Lease. 


(SIGNATURES
ON FOLLOWING PAGE] 





 

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Landlord and Tenant have executed this amendment effective as of the date first written above. 



	

 	
 	

LANDLORD
	

 	
 	

Research Interchange One, L. P.
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/ Brian F. Gaston

	

 	
 	

 	
 	

Print Name:	
 	

Brian F. Gaston
	

 	
 	

 	
 	

Print Title:	
 	

President
	

 	
 	

TENANT
	

 	
 	

Testchip Technologies, Inc.
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/ Martin Kaup

	

 	
 	

 	
 	

Print Name:	
 	

Martin Kaup

	

 	
 	

 	
 	

Print Title:	
 	

Assistant Controller





2









QuickLinks



EXHIBIT 10.19


SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE LEASE BETWEEN Research Interchange One, L.P. as Landlord and Testchip Technologies, Inc. as Tenant For the Premises at 9300 United Drive, Suite 180, Austin, Texas Dated November 17,
2000
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 29, 2011 

y0321 

Order 

 

March 29, 2011 

141533 

JOYCE YURSCO, Personal Representative of the 

Estate of PEARL BUNZOW, Deceased, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141533 

 COA: 291187 

Saginaw CC: 06-062602-NH 

K.K. RAVINDRAN, M.D., K.K. RAVINDRAN, 

M.D., P.C., and VALLEY CARDIOLOGY, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 24, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                  7
<CIK>                                      0001007008
<NAME>                                     VALLEY FORGE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           317,352
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       3,206
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 536,906
<CASH>                                           5,122
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           1,441,019
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          87,115
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,113,503
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              1,830,272
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           34,933
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,500
<OTHER-SE>                                     201,546
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,113,503
<PREMIUMS>                                     164,775
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             15,261
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                (133)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   2,751
<BENEFITS>                                     154,836
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            20,434
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,384
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,648
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,736
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,736
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    94.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    94.72
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
<FN>
                                       18
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 21 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 21

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

              Providing for an adjournment of both Houses.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 21

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, 
February 13, 1997, it stand adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, 
February 25, 1997, or until noon on the second day after Members are 
notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate adjourns 
or recesses at the close of business on Thursday, February 13, 1997, 
pursuant to a motion made by the Majority Leader, or his designee, in 
accordance with this concurrent resolution, it stand recessed or 
adjourned until 11:30 a.m. on Monday, February 24, 1997, or such time 
on that day as may be specified by the Majority Leader or his designee 
in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day 
after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 13, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,__________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A14A2104. DERRICK MCCALLA v. THR GEORGIA LP.

This case originated as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court.

Following an adverse ruling, defendant Derrick McCalla appealed to the superior

court. The superior court also ruled in favor of the plaintiff, and McCalla filed this

direct appeal from the superior court’s order. We lack jurisdiction.

Because the superior court’s order disposed of a de novo appeal from a

magistrate court decision, McCalla was required to follow the discretionary appeal

procedure. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367

(454 SE2d 175) (1995). McCalla’s failure to follow this procedure deprives us of

jurisdiction to consider this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

09/05/2014

September 05, 2014
# Official Journal C 379A/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.379.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 379A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5628 December 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.379.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 379A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5628 December 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 379A/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — 32nd complete edition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2013/C 379A/01

Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — 32nd complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION VII 901 NORTH 5TH STREET KANSAS CITY, KANSAS 66101

September 23, 2011

Peter T Fountain 2519 Hickory Street Omaha, Nebraska 68105

RE: SAID: 19316 2519 Hickory Street Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Assessment

Dear Owner/Resident:

A Lead Based Paint assessment was recently performed on your property by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as part of the Omaha Lead site investigation. The purpose of this assessment is to determine whether a significant quantity of LBP is present on the exterior surface of structures, where deteriorating paint conditions (peeling, flaking, cracking, etc) exist that might increase lead concentrations in the yard above acceptable levels.

Enclosed are the LBP assessment sheets for 2519 Hickory Street. The EPA has developed paint stabilization eligibility criteria that involve measuring the amount of deteriorated LBP on a structure and calculating the concentration of lead in soils around the home that would result if all of the identified deteriorated paint were to fall to the ground and uniformly mix with the soil under certain assumptions. During the LBP assessment, the areal extent of the deteriorated paint observed on structure surfaces was estimated and the lead content in the deteriorated paint was measured using an X-Ray Fluorescence instrument.

The data obtained during the LBP assessment was used to estimate the increase in soil lead concentration that would result if all of the deteriorating paint identified in the assessment were to fall to the ground and mix with surface soil within six feet of the foundation of the structure. For purposes of this calculation, the deteriorating LBP on a structure is assumed to fall onto the ground surface within six feet of the foundation and be uniformly mixed with the top one inch of soil. The estimated lead concentration in the soil potentially caused by the deteriorating LBP provides a measure of the severity of LBP deterioration on individual structures. The EPA uses these criteria to rank properties based on the potential for recontamination of soil to occur. Paint stabilization is being offered at only those households with the most severe LBP problems, particularly where children under the age of seven reside.

The LBP assessment performed by the EPA using the above criteria indicated that your house IS NOT eligible for paint stabilization.If you have any questions or concerns, please contact the EPA Public Information Center at (402) 731-3045.

Sincerely,

Pauletta R. France-Isetts Project Coordinator Environmental Protection Agency

Enclosures Para información en español, llame al EPA Information Center (402) 731-3045.- - Omaha Lead Site LBP Assessment

LEGEND: H-PI-P-01-19316 f- 

# ~ I I
LEVID 

# '

Number Sarn~le Number 

### I 

# 1
Lhlatenal P= Pard

Sample Number Lead Loading StructureIFeature Substrate Color Deterlorated (Windou, stding, porch etc ) (Wood, concrete etc ) Area



## -- P

- - 19316 mg/cm2 ft'