alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Converted by EDGARwiz
















This confirms the agreement entered into by and between NutraFuels, Inc., a Florida corporation (the “Company”) and Bernadette Cawley, an individual hereinafter referred to as the “Service Provider”. The Company and the Service Provider are referred to as the Parties.




Whereas, the Service Provider performed services (the “Services”) for the Company as described below and agreed to provide the Services solely in exchange for shares of the Company’s common stock.

 

Now therefore, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants set forth herein, the parties agree and acknowledge the following: 

 

I. From January 2015-January 2018, (the “Term”) the Service Provider will provide security services for new business development opportunities for Company during the Term.




II. The Services were provided in a professional manner in good faith and in accordance with good industry practice.




III. The Service Provider performed the services as an independent contractor. The Company did not and was not required to make social security, workers’ compensation or unemployment insurance payments on behalf of the Service Provider.




IV. Service Provider is a resident of New Jersey. 




V. As full payment for the Services, the Service Provider accepts 250,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock.




VI. The Company acknowledges receipt of the Services during the Term and the Service Provider acknowledges full payment for the Services as set forth herein.




The Services will be completed on December 31st 2018 (the “Effective Date”). By signing below, the Parties agree and acknowledge the above terms are binding upon them as the Effective Date.  




NutraFuels, Inc.




/s/ Edgar Ward                                  

By: Edgar Ward, Chief Executive Officer




/s/ Bernadette Cawley                                  

Service Provider
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          22,965
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,860
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,860
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,413
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        46,774
<OTHER-SE>                                    (39,327)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,860
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,481
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (18,819)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,819)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,819)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.00)


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register: January 27, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 17)]
[Rules and Regulations]               
[Page 4270]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr27ja10-9]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0604; Airspace Docket No. 09-ASO-18]

 
Establishment of Class E Airspace; Tompkinsville, KY

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action confirms the effective date of a direct final rule 
published in the Federal Register September 14, 2009 that establishes 
Class E Airspace at Tompkinsville--Monroe County Airport, 
Tompkinsville, KY.

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, January 27, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melinda Giddens, Operations Support 
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. 
Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 305-5610.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Confirmation of Effective Date

    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for 
comments in the Federal Register on September 14, 2009 (74 FR 46890), 
Docket No. FAA-2009-0604; Airspace Docket No. 09-ASO-18. The FAA uses 
the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule 
where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. 
This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were 
anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written 
notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received 
within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on 
December 17, 2009. No adverse comments were received, and thus this 
notice confirms that effective date.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on January 14, 2010.
Myron A. Jenkins,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air 
Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2010-1373 Filed 1-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
----

(2004/C 84 E/1000)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0895/04

by Jan Andersson (PSE) to the Commission

(19 March 2004)

Subject:   Dispute concerning port dues in Helsingborg

The Helsingborg port company and SweFerry AB have been in dispute over port dues since 1997. The issue was referred to the Commission in the same year. In 2002, I asked the Commission when it would state its position. Now, in the spring of 2004, the Commission has still not stated its position. When does it intend to do so?

Answer given by Mr Monti on behalf of the Commission

(15 April 2004)

The Honourable Member refers to complaints by two ferry-operators alleging an abuse of a dominant position by the Port of Helsingborg concerning excessive and discriminatory pricing. Since the previous written question E-3064/01 (1) by the Honourable Member on this matter, the Commission has progressed noticeably in its examination of these very complex cases.

In February 2003, the Commission informed the complainants in writing of its preliminary position, in respect of which the complainants have submitted their comments. The Port of Helsingborg has also presented its views on the Commission's preliminary position and on the comments of the complainants. In addition, the Commission has requested and obtained further data from the parties as well as from third parties. On the basis of all this information, the Commission is now preparing the final decision which is expected to be adopted before the end of 2004.

----

(1)OJ C 147 E, 20.6.2002.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                  7
<CIK>                                      0001007008
<NAME>                                     VALLEY FORGE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           304,363
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       3,186
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 482,894
<CASH>                                           1,746
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           1,390,300
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          80,972
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,054,630
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              1,770,707
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           34,807
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,500
<OTHER-SE>                                     194,773
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,054,630
<PREMIUMS>                                      86,083
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              7,305
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                  29
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   1,275
<BENEFITS>                                      81,756
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      1,531
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             7,279
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,126
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,464
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,662
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,662
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    53.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    53.24
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
<FN>
                                       17
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
----

**EXHIBIT        32.2**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY        ACT OF 2002**

| (1)    | the                  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly                  period                  ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                  Act of                  1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
| (2)    | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company.                                                                                                                                                       |

| Date:                  August 10, 2005 | /s/                  Patrick J. Goodman                            |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                   | Patrick                  J. Goodman                                |   |
|                                   | Senior                  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                                   | (chief                  financial officer)                         |   |
#### Lee E. SZYMBORSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SPRING MOUNTAIN TREATMENT CENTER; Darryl Dubroca, in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-15247

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted January 16, 2018 *

Filed January 19, 2018

Lee E. Szymborski, Pro Se

Tyson J. Dobbs, Esquire, Attorney, Hall, Prangle and Schoonveld, LLC, Las Vegas, NV, Jacob Z. Goldstein, Hall Pran-gle & Schoonveld LLC, Chicago, IL, for Defendants-Appellees

Before: REINHARDT, TROTT, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Lee E. Szymborski appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his action alleging violations of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (“EMTALA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Bryant v. Adventist Health Sys./W.,*289 F.3d 1162, 1165 (9th Cir. 2002). We may affirm on any basis supported by the record, *Kohler v. Bed Bath & Beyond of Cal., LLC,*780 F.3d 1260, 1263 (9th Cir. 2015), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Szymborski’s EMTALA claim because Szymborski failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether his son sought care from a hospital with an emergency department or was discharged after coming to an emergency room. *See Bryant,*289 F.3d at 1165-66, 1168 (discussing requirements for an EM-TALA claim, holding that “EMTALA’s stabilization requirement ends when an individual is admitted for inpatient care,” and observing that EMTALA “was not enacted to establish a federal medical malpractice cause of action”); *James v. Sunrise Hosp.,*86 F.3d 885, 889 (9th Cir. 1996) (EMTALA’s transfer provision applies only when an individual “comes to the emergency room”); *see also*42 U.S.C. § 1395dd(a)-(c) (setting out medical screening, stabilizing treatment, and discharge obligations).

We do not consider documents and facts not presented to the district court. *See United States v. Elias,*921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990).

*292Szymborski’s motion to strike (Docket Entry No. 24) is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 227

To authorize the use of additional funds for salaries and expenses of the

Special Committee to Investigate Whitewater Development Corporation

and Related Matters, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 28 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 23), 1996

Mr. D’AMATO, from the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs,

reported the following original resolution

FEBRUARY 28, 1996

Referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

RESOLUTION

To authorize the use of additional funds for salaries and

expenses of the Special Committee to Investigate

Whitewater Development Corporation and Related Matters, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. FUNDS FOR SALARIES AND EXPENSES OF SPE3 CIAL COMMITTEE.

4 There shall be made available from the contingent

5 fund of the Senate out of the Account for Expenses for

6 Inquiries and Investigations, for use before, on, or after

7 February 29, 1996, by the Special Committee to Inves-
2

•SRES 227 RTS

1 tigate Whitewater Development Corporation and Related

2 Matters (hereafter in this Resolution referred to as the

3 ‘‘Special Committee’’), established by Senate Resolution

4 120, 104th Congress, agreed to May 17, 1995 (as amend5 ed by Senate Resolution 153, 104th Congress, agreed to

6 July 17, 1995) to carry out the investigation, study, and

7 hearings authorized by that Senate Resolution—

8 (1) a sum equal to not more than $600,000—

9 (A) for payment of salaries and other ex10 penses of the Special Committee; and

11 (B) not more than $475,000 of which may

12 be used by the Special Committee for the pro13 curement of the services of individual consult14 ants or organizations thereof; and

15 (2) such additional sums as may be necessary

16 for agency contributions related to the compensation

17 of employees of the Special Committee.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Qualsec. (the "Company") on Form  10-K for the  period  ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof  (the "Report"),  I, Edward Bukstel,, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Edward Bukstel

By: Edward Bukstel

Chief Executive and Financial Officer

February 5, 2010
## fi : 

# ~u..t~m----1-,J,~, ~1*&5!l, 

# m~r~. ~~nu- 

# ~.a~.

IMU:iiBIBHIJf.l ~JID.ra~, iiJJ.~U©:=f'l'b~~MU~ml©MU. 

# fi: b~m!©MUIM**I~~.~~~­** 

## U1tU!il©MUIM, Hll~~, 

# ill~. ii~Hl'bftMarnll~Jl'b--.C I 

# rA~~i'i]ff~~n~IMU~lEmifF.

WWW.DJI.COM

# 5800 EVO Usage Notes Remount Propellers Please use screws M3.0x8(2pcs) and washers (4pcs)to remount propellers. fixthe screws with 4Kg.cm(0.4N.m) torque, thethread locker is necessary. 

# v 

# v Tip, You can refer to the original tensions of other screws ifyou are not familiar with torque measurement.

# ~ ; ~

## ==~~~~ Note: Loose screws are not easy forthread locker to dry and solidify. 

### Propellers Shoot Precautions Tips: It is recommended to make tokens on the screws and propeller covers, which will help you to check whether the propellers are loose. Check the tokens before every flight.



### Propeller Holder Usage

l.Attach the Blade Holder

### to the Frame. 2. Fix the blade to the Blade Holder 

### IMU Mount Usage Fix the IMU module on IMU Mount. aiming et achieving smootherflight experience.Tips, 1. Choose the IMU Mount if required, which will decline the aircraft maneuverability during flying. 

## 2. It is necessary to reduce the value of basic gain appropriatelywhen the lt-iU t-iount is used. 3. Make sure the batteries are firm mounted, otherwise, itwill impedethe normal work of IMU. 

### Mount and Check Vibration Dampers Mountvibration dampers strictly as follow pictures to achieve wel Idamping effect and easy assembly. Check them as much es possible.

e2013 DJI lnnov1tion1. All Rights Resarvad. WWW.DJI.COM
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 23

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal

the twenty-second amendment relating to Presidential term limitations.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 24 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 1995

Mr. MCCONNELL introduced the following joint resolution; which was read

twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to repeal the twenty-second amendment relating

to Presidential term limitations.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years from the date of its submission

9 by the Congress:
2

•SJ 23 IS

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘The twenty-second article of amendment to the Con3 stitution of the United States is hereby repealed.’’.

Æ
Order filed March 29, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-22-00217-CV

____________

IN THE INTEREST OF R.R.A., H.G.A., H.B.A., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 308th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2019-63090

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a parental termination

appeal. Appellant has filed a motion for extension of time to file a notice of 

appeal. The motion does not comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, 

as it includes the full names of the minors at issue in this appeal. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 9.8(b)(1)(A).

Accordingly, we order appellant’s motion STRICKEN. If appellant refiles a 

motion to extend time to file a notice of appeal, appellant must not include his own full 

name nor that of the mother of the minors at issue in this appeal, including in any 

certificate of service accompanying the motion. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.8(b)(1)(B).

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Poissant, and Wilson.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 17-3066

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

William Henry Adkins

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Council Bluffs

____________

 Submitted: May 11, 2018

Filed: May 24, 2018

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

William Adkins directly appeals the judgment entered by the district court

1

after he was convicted upon a jury verdict of drug and firearm charges, and was

The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge for

1

the Southern District of Iowa. 
sentenced to a total of 360 months in prison. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and

has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the

admission at trial of evidence related to a prior conviction, the sufficiency of the

evidence to support the jury verdict, and the reasonableness of Adkins’s sentence. 

We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the

prior-conviction evidence in light of its relevance to the material issues of Adkins’s

knowledge, intent, and absence of mistake. See United States v. Clark, 668 F.3d 568,

574-75 (8th Cir. 2012) (finding no abuse of discretion in admission of Federal Rule

of Evidence 404(b) evidence that was relevant to material issue in case). We further

conclude that there was sufficient evidence to support the jury verdict. See United

States v. Birdine, 515 F.3d 842, 844 (8th Cir. 2008) (sufficiency of evidence to

sustain conviction is reviewed de novo); United States v. Spears, 454 F.3d 830, 832

(8th Cir. 2006) (this court will reverse only if no reasonable jury could have found

defendant guilty beyond reasonable doubt). In addition, we conclude that the district

court did not impose an unreasonable sentence. See United States v. Feemster, 572

F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (reviewing sentence under deferential

abuse-of-discretion standard; discussing substantive reasonableness).

Having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488

U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s

motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

______________________________

-2-