alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 MEMORANDUM - DRAFT

DATE: April 25, 2007

SUBJECT: Summary of the Thunder Creek FB-1156 Compressor Station Spotted Horse, Wyoming Compressor Engines Test Report

FROM: Lucy Adams Alpha-Gamma Technologies, Inc.

TO: Jaime Pagán, EPA Energy Strategies Group

This memorandum summarizes the June 12, 2002, test report for eight natural gas fueled reciprocating compressor engines at the Thunder Creek FB-1156 Compressor Station. The compressor station is located in Sec tion 11, Township 55 North, Range 76 West, approximately 9 miles northwest of Spotted Ho rse, in Campbell County, Wyoming. This test report was submitted to Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0059 and can be
found in that docket as Document ID Number 0590.

The FB-1156 Compressor Station has two (2) 1,340 horsepower (hp) 3516LE Caterpillar lean burn compressor engines, five (5) 586 hp 3412LE Caterpillar lean burn compressor engines, and one 1,390 hp 7042GSI Waukesha rich burn compressor engines. The engines are four-stroke natural gas-fired engi nes. This station compresses field gas for transmission through pipelines.

These tests were undertaken as part of th e annual performance test to demonstrate compliance with formaldehyde emission limits, annual nitrogen oxides (NO

x ) and carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring for the Caterpi llar 3412LE compressor engines, and the quarterly monitoring requirements for the Waukesha 7042 GSI engine.

Test results for NO

x and CO are presented in Table 1, and test results for formaldehyde are presented in Table 2. Testing at this site used EPA Methods 1, 2C, 3, 4, 7E, 10, and 19. The formaldehyde tests used acetylacet one (Celanese method CL 8-4) and Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) test methods. The test report did not indicate that performance testing was conducted for total hydr ocarbons or volatile organic compounds.2 Table 1: NO

x and CO Test Results

Unit Test Date NO

x Tested (g/hp-hr) CO Tested (g/hp-hr) CO
Destruction

Efficiency (%) FB A, Caterpillar 3516LE 6/11/02 0.86 0.12 89 FB B, Caterpillar 3516LE 6/11/02 0.93 0.20 86 FB D, Waukesha 7042GSI 6/11/02 0.94 0.71 NT SC A, Caterpillar 3412LE 6/11/02 0.56 0.38 83 SC B, Caterpillar 3412LE 6/12/02 0.34 0.36 85 SC C, Caterpillar 3412LE 6/12/02 0.83 0.42 86 SC D, Caterpillar 3412LE 6/12/02 0.88 0.39 87 SC E, Caterpillar 3412LE 6/12/02 0.74 0.41 82

NT: Not Tested

Table 2: Formaldehyde Test Results

Unit Test Date Celanese
Run 1A (g/hp-hr) Celanese
Run 1B (g/hp-hr) Average
Celanese (g/hp-hr) FTIR Testing (g/hp-hr) FB A, Caterpillar 3516LE 6/11/02 0.008 0.01 0.009 0.01 FB B, Caterpillar 3516LE 6/11/02 0.01 0.08 0.08 0.02 FB D, Waukesha 7042GSI 6/11/02 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.01 SC A, Caterpillar 3412LE 6/11/02 0.05 0.06 0.055 0.05 SC B, Caterpillar 3412LE 6/12/02 0.05 0.006 0.05 0.02 SC C, Caterpillar 3412LE 6/12/02 0.09 0.03 0.06 0.02 SC D, Caterpillar 3412LE 6/12/02 0.12 0.13 0.12 0.02 SC E, Caterpillar 3412LE 6/12/02 0.18 0.08 0.13 0.02
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of FFD Financial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Trent B. Troyer, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/  Trent B. TroyerTrent B. TroyerPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMay 15, 2009
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15D0044. KENNETH BEAMON v. THE STATE.

Prisoner Kenneth Beamon sought to proceed in forma pauperis to change his

name from Kenneth Rayshaun Beamon to Kenneth Rayshaun Shabazz. The trial

court dismissed the pleading under OCGA § 9-15-2 (d) based upon Beamon’sfailure

to establish venue and jurisdiction and failure to include a proper pauper’s affidavit. 

Beamon filed an application for discretionary appeal from this ruling.

1 Although

Beamon included a copy of the trial court’s order, it was not a stamped “filed” copy

as required by Court of Appeals Rule 31 (e).

Without the stamped “filed” copy of the order, we cannot ascertain if the

application was filed within 30 days, which is a jurisdictional requirement. See

OCGA § 5-6-35 (d); Boyle v. State of Ga., 190 Ga. App. 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). 

Accordingly, on September 10, 2014, we ordered Beamon to supplement his

application within ten days with a stamped “filed” copy of the order to be appealed. 

We provided that failure to comply with this directive would result in dismissal of the

application. Beamon has notsubmitted a stamped “filed” copy of the order, and more

than ten days have passed since the September 10, 2014 order. Accordingly,

Beamon’s application is hereby DISMISSED.

1 Beamon filed his application to the Supreme Court, which transferred the

matter to this Court.

October 01, 2014
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

10/01/2014
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report (the Report) on the Form 10-K of Munro Developments Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Daniel Jabour, Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  Date: April 17, 2014  /s/ Daniel Jabour Daniel Jabour Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, President, Secretary and Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           5
       
<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                      Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                        Sep-30-1997
<CASH>                                              1,827,170
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       175,969
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         59,751
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    2,130,878
<PP&E>                                              1,650,377
<DEPRECIATION>                                      457,718
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      3,666,170
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               616,417
<BONDS>                                             0
<COMMON>                                            5,769
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                          2,935,510
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        3,666,170
<SALES>                                             1,786,583
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    2,100,066
<CGS>                                               1,052,944
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       4,099,552
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    3,013,432
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  33,176
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (1,999,486)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (1,999,486)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.39)
        

</TABLE>
Question on Proposed RTR for Marine Vessel Loading -- proposed paragraph 

(f) to section 63.560 

Steve Shedd to: Wozniak, Russell (RA) 09/30/2010 01:09 PM

Russell

Thank you for pointing this out. I agree, we are missing a new proposed paragraph (f) to section 

63.560. Our intent was to not only require submerged fill, but also the control loading's of more than one 

million barrels of gasoline. The proposed rule text should read as follows:

Propose to add paragraph (f) to section 63.560 as follows:

(f) A source referred to this paragraph by (a)(1) or (2) of this section, must meet (f)(1) and (2) of 

this section.

 (1) The submerged fill standards of 46 CFR 153.282, and

 (2) The provisions of §63.562(f)(1) or §63.562(f)(2), if the terminal loads more than 1 million 

barrels (M barrels) of gasoline.

Stephen Shedd, Coatings and Chemicals Group, (E143-01)

Sector Policies and Programs Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards,

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27707

Voice: 919 541-5397 Fax: 919 685-3195

"Wozniak, Russell (RA)" Steve, I was reading a pre-proposed ver... 09/29/2010 10:55:10 AM

From: "Wozniak, Russell (RA)" <wozniara@dow.com>

To: Steve Shedd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 09/29/2010 10:55 AM

Subject: Question on Proposed RTR for Marine Vessel Loading

Steve, 

I was reading a pre-proposed version of the changes to Subpart Y. Section 63.560 refers to a paragraph 

(f) in a couple of different sections. However, I didn't see the proposed paragraph (f) text. Should (f) say 

something like comply with the submerged fill standards of 46 CFR 153.282? 

Can you forward the proposed paragraph (f) to me? 

Thanks, 

Russell A. Wozniak 

Global Regulatory Affairs

The Dow Chemical Company

Office 361-553-2920 

Mobile 361-649-2249
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 53 (Friday, March 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 15442]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05772]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Time-Sensitive Obesity 
PAR review.
    Date: April 19, 2022.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NIDDK/National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy 
Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Michele L. Barnard, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NIDDK, 
National Institutes of Health, Room 7353, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-2542, (301) 594-8898, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e48685968a85968089a4819c909685ca8a8d80808fca8a8d8cca838b92"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c3a1a2b1ada2b1a7ae83a6bbb7b1a2edadaaa7a7a8edadaaabeda4acb5">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

     Dated: March 15, 2022.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-05772 Filed 3-17-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 72

Expressing support for the nation and people of Japan and deepest condolences for the losses suffered as the result of the earthquake of January

17, 1995.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 25 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 1995

Mr. BINGAMAN (for himself, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. DOLE, Mr. ROCKEFELLER,

Mr. PELL, and Mr. ROBB) submitted the following resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Expressing support for the nation and people of Japan and

deepest condolences for the losses suffered as the result

of the earthquake of January 17, 1995.

Whereas on the morning of January 17, 1995 a devastating

and deadly earthquake shook the cities of Kobe and

Osaka, Japan killing more than 5,000 people injuring

more than 25,000 and leaving more than 300,000 temporarily homeless;

Whereas the earthquake of January 17, 1995 has left more

than 46,440 buildings in ruin, destroyed highways, train

lines and other infrastructure and has caused losses of as

much as $80 billion in Kobe alone;
2

SRES 72 ATS

Whereas the tradition of strength, courage, determination,

and community of the people of Japan has been displayed

time again by the citizens of Kobe and Osaka and, indeed, all of Japan since the earthquake and has served

as an inspiration to all of the world;

Whereas the nations and people of the United States and

Japan share a strong, decades old history of friendship

and mutual interests and respect; and

Whereas the people of the United States, having suffered a

similar tragedy almost a year ago to the day of the Kobe

and Osaka earthquake, share in the pain and hope of the

people of Japan: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved,

2 (1) The Senate expresses its deepest sympathies

3 to the nation of Japan and the citizens of Kobe and

4 Osaka for the tragic losses suffered as a result of

5 the earthquake of January 17, 1995.

6 (2) The Senate expresses its support to the peo7 ple of Japan as they continue their noble efforts to

8 rebuild their cities and their lives.

9 (3) The Senate expresses its friendship to the

10 people of Kobe and Osaka and pledges its support

11 for their efforts in the face of this disaster.

Æ
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth Ray HUNTER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-7205

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 21, 2017

Decided: November 28, 2017

Kenneth Ray Hunter, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Donald Warner, Assistant United States Attorney, Elkins, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

*296Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Ray Hunter appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the court’s prior order denying Hunter’s motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012), because Hunter was sentenced as a career offender. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. *See United States v. May,*855 F.3d 271, 274 (4th Cir. 2017) (noting that prohibition on a district court’s consideration of a motion to reconsider a § 3582 order is not jurisdictional and is waived if not invoked by the government). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMOQUEST
CORPORATION'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 2, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>            1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                            OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                                              42,751
<SECURITIES>                                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       99,321
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         3,557
<INVENTORY>                                                         68,637
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                   329,047
<PP&E>                                                              91,364
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      31,290
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                     634,593
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                              167,400
<BONDS>                                                              5,304
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                                              0
<COMMON>                                                               515
<OTHER-SE>                                                         437,636
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                       634,593
<SALES>                                                            321,402
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                   321,402
<CGS>                                                              169,016
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                      169,016
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    21,647
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       281
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   3,939
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     55,122
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        22,774
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 32,348
<DISCONTINUED>                                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                                        32,348
<EPS-BASIC>                                                         0.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0.62


</TABLE>
Rel: July 12, 2024

STATE OF ALABAMA -- JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT

THE SUPREME COURT

SPECIAL TERM, 2024

SC-2023-0748

Gary Noland and Nue Cheer Franklin v. Montgomery Real Estate 

Buyers, LLC, and Joseph Back (Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court: 

CV-23-900565).

BRYAN, Justice.

AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. R. App. P.

Parker, C.J., and Shaw, Mendheim, and Mitchell, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 18, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41302 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. RAMIRO MATA-ORTIZ Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:05-CR-459-ALL
Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ramiro Mata-Ortiz (Mata) appeals following his guilty plea to being illegally present in the United States following a prior deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). The district court increased Mata’s base offense level by 1 6 levels pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A) because it determined that Mata’s prior conviction in Tennesseefor recklessaggravated assault wasa crime of violence. Mata argues that the enhancement was improper because the Tennessee offense is broader than the generic, contemporary meaning ofNo. 05-41302

2 aggravated assault. Mata’s argument is unavailing in light of our decision in United States v. Mungia-Portillo, 484 F.3d 813, 816-17 (5th Cir. 2007). In light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), Mata also challenges the constituti onality of § 1326(b)'s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements ofthe offense that must be found by a jury. This court has held that this issue is “fully foreclosed from further debate.” U nited Statesv. Pineda-Arrellano, ___F.3d ___, 2007 WL 2033992, *1 (5th Cir. July 17, 2007). AFFIRMED.
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 142

To congratulate the New Jersey Devils for becoming the 1995 NHL

champions and thus winning the Stanley Cup.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 27 (legislative day, JUNE 19), 1995

Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself and Mr. BRADLEY) submitted the following

resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To congratulate the New Jersey Devils for becoming the

1995 NHL champions and thus winning the Stanley Cup.

Whereas on October 5, 1982, the New Jersey Devils played

their first National Hockey League game in New Jersey,

embarking on a quest for the Stanley Cup which was satisfied 13 years later;

Whereas the Devils epitomize New Jersey pride with their

heart, stamina, and drive and thus have become a part

of New Jersey culture;

Whereas the New Jersey Devils won 10 games on the road

during the Stanley Cup playoffs, thus demolishing the

previous record;

Whereas the Devils have implemented an ingenious system

known as the ‘‘trap’’ that was designed by head coach
2

SRES 142 ATS

Jacques Lemaire which constantly stifled and frustrated

their opponents;

Whereas Conn Symthe trophy winner Claude Lemieux led the

league with 13 playoff goals, three of which were gamewinners, and goalie Martin Brodeur led the league with

a 1.67 goals-against average during the playoffs;

Whereas the New Jersey hockey fans are the best fans in the

Nation and deserve commendation for helping build the

team into championship caliber and for supporting the

Devils during their drive for the Stanley Cup; and

Whereas the New Jersey Devils during the playoffs beat Boston, Pittsburgh, Philadelphia and in the finals swept the

heavily favored Detroit Red Wings in four games giving

the State of New Jersey its first-ever championship for

a major league team officially bearing the State’s name:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate congratulates the New Jer2 sey Devils for their outstanding discipline, determination,

3 emotion, and ingenuity, in winning the 1995 NHL Stanley

4 Cup.

Æ