alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 236 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 236

  To express the sense of the Congress that any Executive order that 
  infringes on the powers and duties of the Congress under article I, 
section 8 of the Constitution, or that would require the expenditure of 
  Federal funds not specifically appropriated for the purpose of the 
        Executive order, is advisory only unless enacted as law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 1998

Mr. Metcalf (for himself, Mr. Hyde, Mr. Bunning, Mr. Lucas of Oklahoma, 
   Mr. Neumann, Mr. Hilleary, Mr. Smith of Michigan, Mr. Herger, Mr. 
    Gilman, Mr. Traficant, and Mr. Chabot) submitted the following 
   concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  To express the sense of the Congress that any Executive order that 
  infringes on the powers and duties of the Congress under article I, 
section 8 of the Constitution, or that would require the expenditure of 
  Federal funds not specifically appropriated for the purpose of the 
        Executive order, is advisory only unless enacted as law.

Whereas some Executive orders have infringed on the prerogatives of the Congress 
        and resulted in the expenditure of Federal funds not appropriated for 
        the specific purposes of those Executive orders: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that any Executive order issued by 
the President before, on, or after the date of the approval of this 
resolution that infringes on the powers and duties of the Congress 
under article I, section 8 of the Constitution, or that would require 
the expenditure of Federal funds not specifically appropriated for the 
purpose of the Executive order, is advisory only unless enacted as law.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Rafael PARTIDA-ZARAGOZA, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-41549 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed November 29, 2017

Eileen K. Wilson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S, Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, *400Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Roberto Balli, Attorney, Laredo, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

' PER CURIAM: *

Rafael Partida-Zaragoza pleaded guilty, pursuant to a plea agreement, to conspiring to harbor an undocumented alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1824. Partida-Zara-goza’s guilty plea was conditional under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(a)(2), and he reserved the right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress the evidence acquired during a search of a house in Laredo, Texas, that resulted in his arrest.

Nothing materially distinguishes Parti-da-Zaragoza’s case from that of his code-fendant, Everardo Rodriguez-Mendoza. We thus conclude that Partida-Zaragoza lacked standing to raise a Fourth Amendment challenge to the search. *See United States v. Rodriguez-Mendoza,*697 Fed.Appx. 853 (5th Cir. 2017); *see also United States v. Briones-Garza,*680 F.2d 417 (5th Cir. 1982) (involving similar facts and holding that standing was lacking).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              Jan-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                Sep-30-1998
<CASH>                                      1,346,799
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               231,108
<ALLOWANCES>                                35,000
<INVENTORY>                                 51,506
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            1,704,283
<PP&E>                                      1,080,114
<DEPRECIATION>                              310,789
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              2,738,302
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       631,619
<BONDS>                                     0
<COMMON>                                    1,495
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 248
<OTHER-SE>                                  2,069,348
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                2,738,302
<SALES>                                     2,320,475
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            2,724,970
<CGS>                                       1,173,205
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               5,455,250
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            4,271,170
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          10,875
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,730,280)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,730,280)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               (2.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (2.00)
        

<PAGE>


</TABLE>
#### Rainer Eric Nikolaus FALKENHORST, Plaintiff-Appellant v. HARRIS COUNTY CHILDREN’S PROTECTIVE SERVICES, Mr. George D. Ford (Attorney); Patrick S. Shelton, Ex Judge; Greg Abott, Governor; Jean Spailding Hughes, Judge, Defendants-Appellees

No. 17-20274 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 9, 2018

Rainer Eric Nikolaus Falkenhorst, Pro Se

Before KING, ELROD, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Rainer Eric Nikolaus Falkenhorst, Texas prisoner # 01938554, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). Falkenhorst further moves for the appointment of counsel, for oral argument, and for leave to file a supplemental brief to present evidence in support of government intervention under 28 U.S.C. § 2403.

Falkenhorst sued Harris County Children’s Protective Services and its director George.D. Ford, Jr.; Texas Governor Greg Abbott; and eight judges who participated in a 2006 state court case regarding the termination of Falkenhorst’s parental rights over his child, claiming that the defendants conspired to deprive him of the custody of his child; deprived him of due process, a fair trial, and counsel; defamed and defrauded him; and breached their fiduciary duties. Falkenhorst sought a retrial of the case in state court, full custody of his child, and monetary damages for court error during the original state proceedings.

On appeal, Falkenhorst challenges only the conclusion that the *Rooker-Feldman**1***doctrine deprived the district court of subject-matter jurisdiction over his federal claims. Our review is de novo. *See Brunson v.*Nichols, 875 F.3d 275, 277 (5th Cir. 2017).

The *Rooker-Feldman*doctrine applies to “cases brought by state-court losers complaining of injuries caused by state-court judgments rendered before the district court proceedings commenced and inviting district court review and rejection of those judgments.” *Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic-Indus. Corp.,*544 U.S. 280, 284, 125 S.Ct. 1517, 161 L.Ed.2d 454 (2005). Because Falkenhorst’s § 1983 suit sought to overturn the state-court judgment, the district court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over the § 1983 claims pursuant to the *Rooker-Feldman*doctrine. *See id.*at 283-84, 291-92, 125 S.Ct. 1517; *see also Bibbs v. Harris,*578 Fed.Appx. 448, 449 (5th Cir. 2014).2

*229AFFIRMED; MOTIONS FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, ORAL ARGUMENT, and INTERVENTION DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

1

. *See Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co.,*263 U.S. 413, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923); *D.C. Court of Appeals*v. *Feldman,*460 U.S. 462, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983).

2

. Although an unpublished opinion issued after January 1, 1996 is not controlling authori*229ty, it may be considered as persuasive authority. *See Ballard v. Burton,*444 F.3d 391, 401 & n.7 (5th Cir. 2006); 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001006591
<NAME> WHITE PINE SOFTWARE, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-03-1998
<CASH>                                      11,081,683
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,765,159
<ALLOWANCES>                                   139,453
<INVENTORY>                                     94,761
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,023,527
<PP&E>                                       4,118,026
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,592,827
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,622,682
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,311,741
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        93,632
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,622,682
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,706,949
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  720,399
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,836,603
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                15,870
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 603
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,518,494)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,306
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,523,800)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.49)
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

The undersigned executiveofficer of First Federal Bancshares of Arkansas, Inc. (the “Registrant”) herebycertifies that the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information containedtherein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Registrant.

 

 
|   |             | By:    |   /s/ Larry J. Brandt     |
|--------|------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|
|   |             |   |   Larry J. Brandt         |
|   |             |   |   Chief Executive Officer |
|   |             |   |                                |
| Date:  | October 31, 2007 |   |                                |

 

----
----

Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United StatesCode)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each ofthe undersigned officers of PREFERENTIAL EQUITIES CORP., a Nevada corporation(the "Company"), does hereby certify, [to such officer's knowledge], that:

The Form 10-KSB for the nine month period ended December 31, 2006****(the"Form *10-KSB*") of the Company fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and theinformation contained in the Form *10-KSB* fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                   

**Dated: March 29, 2007     /s/ Harry Miller    Harry Miller, Chief Executive Officer  Dated: March 29, 2007     /s/ Harry Miller    Harry Miller, Chief Financial Officer**

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
#### Ryan Dark WHITE, Name, as Attorney-In-Fact and representing the whole Class of Plaintiffs, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Attorney General Ashcroft; Attorney General Gonzalez; Attorney General Holder; Attorney General Lynch; Attorney General Sessions; Rod Rosenstein; Donna Hansen, Warden; Larry Hogan, Governor of the State of Maryland; Martin O’Malley, Governor of the State of Maryland; Unnamed Defendants, 1-200, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-6750

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 20, 2017

Decided: December 7, 2017

Ryan Dark White, Appellant Pro Se.

Before DIAZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ryan Dark White appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no *199reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See White v. United States,*No. 1:17-cv-01355-JKB, 2017 WL 2418251 (D. Md. June 2, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned, Robert S. Herlin, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Natural Gas Systems, Inc. (the "Company"), certifies in connection with the
filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report")")
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
and for the periods covered in the Report.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
14th day of February, 2006.



                                       /s/ ROBERT S. HERLIN
                                       --------------------------------
                                       Robert S. Herlin
                                       Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Natural Gas Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Natural Gas
Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request. The foregoing certificate is being furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to this Form 10-QSB and shall
not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-QSB.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets and Consolidated Condensed Statements
of Earnings as reported on Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by 
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jan-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Feb-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   May-03-1997

<CASH>                                         277,300
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  169,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    2,551,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,057,600
<PP&E>                                         5,327,800
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,311,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,898,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,499,100
<BONDS>                                        906,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       30,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,061,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,898,900
<SALES>                                        1,924,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,924,100
<CGS>                                          1,326,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               56,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             16,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                46,300
<INCOME-TAX>                                   16,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            29,400
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   29,400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .10
        


</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 32002R1629 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32002R1629

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1629/2002 of 12 September 2002 amending the export refunds on syrups and certain other sugar sector products exported in the natural state **

*
Official Journal L 246 , 13/09/2002 P. 0027 - 0028 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1629/2002

of 12 September 2002

amending the export refunds on syrups and certain other sugar sector products exported in the natural state

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector(1), as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 680/2002(2), and in particular the third indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) The refunds on syrups and certain other sugar products were fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1555/2002(3).

(2) It follows from applying the rules, criteria and other provisions contained in Regulation (EC) No 1555/2002 to the information at present available to the Commission that the export refunds at present in force should be altered as shown in the Annex hereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The refunds to be granted on the products listed in Article 1(1)(d), (f) and (g) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001, exported in the natural state, as fixed in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1555/2002 are hereby altered to the amounts shown in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 13 September 2002.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 September 2002.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 104, 20.4.2002, p. 26.

(3) OJ L 234, 31.8.2002, p. 5.

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 12 September 2002 altering the export refunds on syrups and certain other sugar products exported in the natural state

>TABLE>

NB:

The product codes and the "A" series destination codes are set out in Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 (OJ L 366, 24.12.1987, p. 1) as amended.

The numeric destination codes are set out in Commission Regulation (EC) No 2020/2001 (OJ L 273, 16.10.2001, p. 6).
r US.Depot'-"'at T....,spe>rtallon O!r•ce

**or·~e**secr'.!IQfYol

**frtl!"so:>··:~•-on** Chief. Documentary Services Div. Depanment of Transportation Washington. 

### D.C. 20590



## LAN Argentina S.A. DESIGNATION OF AGENT FOR SERVICE OF NOTICE. PROCESS. ORDERS DECISlONS AND REQUIREMENTS

ATTENTION: DOCKET SECTION. C-55 (Name of Company. please print) office at . ha'-'ing its principal
hereby

**de~igmnes.** pursuant to

**~eclion** -16103 ofTitle 49 ofthe U.S. Code 1 fom1erly

**~ection** 1005tbl oftht Fedtr;d A\huion Act of 1958. Qlo amt!ndedJ the pen.on named 0!:'/etw :IS its Agent upon "·hom sen·ice ofall n01ices and proc:elo)'o; and all onk-r\. decision'. and requirements ofthe Department of·Transportation may be made for and on behalfof

**~aid** canier. hereby canceling all

**pl'e\'iOU~** designations ofagents made by it to the DOT. 

### Charles F. Donley II, charles.donley@squirepb.com,

**1-202-626-6~40** Name of **Agent--------------------------------------~----------------~------** (Please Print) 

### Address 

## 1200 19th Street, N.W., Suite 300, Washington, D.C. 20036 The Agent 

### so designated has written 

### his name and 

### also nil; initials 

### in the following space: Nome



# ~ 

# f. 

# .rik4 Jl: (Initials)

# _e __ 

# ro ______ _ IN WITNESS WHEREOF. 

## _ LA __ N_A_r_g_e_n_t_in_a_S..:..:A_.

# -----------hascaused rhese (Name of Company! presents to be signed in its name by 

## _ __._A_,_,....,.v'--"():=L...:!(,_,£=5::....---_.._.13"""'-'-i_,_ft-N-'-"-=--C=-:--I-J-'-'-J----· President 

### L !Please Print) 

# A.tJfh0f2. ( 

### Zb{) 

## 6i6-IJA JTJJ2.. or said company. and to be attested under its corporate seal by **Attorn~y-in-fact** 

### (Secretary. or other Title) on this ___ 

## 5 ___ day of 

# .::J 

# ltv..\ 19 

### 2015 

## LAN Argentina S.A. By: ATIEST: (Secretary. or other officer) OST F 1010.5 (1-95)