alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1





EXHIBIT 99.1

                        SAFE HARBOR COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

         The Company believes that the following factors could cause actual
results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements set forth
in this Form 10-QSB. 

1.       The terms upon which the Company may terminate the delivery of
         management services to certain Affiliated Practices, including the
         consideration received by the Company for the sale of the assets
         associated with these Affiliated Practices.

2.       The Company's ability to monitor the expenses at the Affiliated
         Practices.

3.       The Company's ability to timely and successfully implement its plan to
         amend its existing arrangements or unwind affiliations as well as
         satisfactorily resolve certain disputes with its Affiliated
         Orthodontists.

4.       The level of competition in the orthodontic practice management
         industry.

5.       Regulatory development and changes in the United States healthcare
         system and dental and orthodontic professions that may affect the
         profitability of the Company or the enforceability of the Company's
         operative agreements with its Affiliated Practices and Affiliated
         Orthodontists.

6.       The Company's dependence on revenues generated by the Affiliated
         Orthodontists of the Affiliated Practices and the ability of the
         Affiliated Practices to repay loans made to the Affiliated Practices to
         fund deficits in monthly cash flows of the Affiliated Practices.

7.       The Company's ability to secure capital, and the related cost of such
         capital, needed to fund the future growth of the Company.

8.       The Company's ability to staff the Affiliated Practices with
         appropriate qualified personnel.

9.       The continued availability to the Company of adequate insurance.

10.      The Affiliated Practices' reputation for delivering high-quality
         patient care and their ability to attract and retain patients.

11.      The Company's ability to attract and retain skilled management.

12.      Liability risks associated with providing orthodontic services.

         The foregoing factors should not be construed as exhaustive or as an
admission regarding the adequacy of disclosures previously made by the Company.
All capitalized terms used in this Exhibit 99.1 not otherwise defined herein
have the same meanings as prescribed to such terms in the Form 10-QSB.
# EUR-Lex - 32003R1401 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32003R1401

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1401/2003 of 6 August 2003 amending Regulation (EC) No 245/2001 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1673/2000 on the common organisation of the markets in flax and hemp grown for fibre **

*
Official Journal L 199 , 07/08/2003 P. 0003 - 0003 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1401/2003

of 6 August 2003

amending Regulation (EC) No 245/2001 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1673/2000 on the common organisation of the markets in flax and hemp grown for fibre

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1673/2000 of 27 July 2000 on the common organisation of the markets in flax and hemp grown for fibre(1), as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 651/2002(2), and in particular Article 9 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Under the second indent of Article 7(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 245/2001(3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 651/2002, aid for processing flax and hemp straw shall be payable on flax and hemp fibre only where it is obtained before 1 May following the end of the marketing year in question. Under Article 12(2) of that Regulation, processing aid and, where appropriate, additional aid shall be paid by the Member State on whose territory the flax or hemp straw has been harvested before 1 August following the time limit above.

(2) Given the time required to complete the administrative formalities and checks prior to the granting and final payment of the aid, the time limit for payment of the aid by the Member States should be extended. In order to ensure continuity, it is necessary to provide for retroactive application of the measure as from 1 August 2003.

(3) The deadline by which the Member States notify information on the marketing year to the Commission should therefore be amended.

(4) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Flax and Hemp,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 245/2001 is hereby amended as follows:

1. in Article 12(2), "1 August" is replaced by "15 October";

2. in Article 15(3), "30 September" is replaced by "15 December".

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It is applicable as from 1 August 2003.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 August 2003.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 193, 29.7.2000, p. 16.

(2) OJ L 101, 17.4.2002, p. 3.

(3) OJ L 35, 6.2.2001, p. 18.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jimmy CHESSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-7003

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 29, 2017

Decided: January 18, 2018

*185Jimmy Chesson, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Russell Pender, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina; John Howarth Bennett, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Chesson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2258(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2258(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v.*McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Chesson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Midstream Integrity Services, LLC (henceforth referred to as "MIS") hereby petitions the Secretary 

ofTransportation and Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") to add the following aircraft to the 

petition granted to MIS (Exemption No. 11554, FAA Docket No. FAA-2015-0377) as well as the 

COA granted to MIS (FAA-2015-0377-333E.) 

Aircraft and Equipment 

MIS will use the following unmanned aircraft (UA) for inspection and photography work: 

• DJI Phantom III 

• Roboflight RF-70 

Aircraft gross weight will not exceed respective operation manual guidance. 

Operating characteristics and maintenance procedures are outlined in the attached operations 

manuals. The radio frequency spectrum used for operation and control of the UA will comply with 

the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) or other appropriate government oversight agency 

requirements. 

All aircraft operated in accordance with this exemption will be identified by serial number, registered 

in accordance with 14 CFR part 47, and have identification (N-Number) markings in accordance with 

14 CFR part 45, Subpart C. Markings will be as large as practicable. 

If the UA loses communications or loses its GPS signal, it will return to a pre-determined location 

within the planned operating area and land or be recovered in accordance with the operating 

documents. 

Altitude awareness will be maintained via a radio communications telemetry data link, which 

downlinks from the aircraft to the PIC for active monitoring of the flight path. The altitude 

information will be generated by GPS equipment installed on the aircraft. Prior to each flight, a zero 

altitude initiation point will be established and confirmed for accuracy by the UAS PIC. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Landon Phillips 

Program Manager, Unmanned Aerial Systems 

Midstream Integrity Services
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                          ONYX ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
 
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         THREE MONTHS ENDED            SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                              JUNE 30,                     JUNE 30,
                                                       -----------------------     -------------------------
                                                         1997          1996           1997           1996
                                                       --------     ----------     ----------     ----------
<S>                                                    <C>          <C>            <C>            <C>
PRIMARY:
Net Income...........................................  $653,210     $2,115,708     $1,265,654     $5,315,464
                                                       ========     ==========     ==========     ==========
Shares as adjusted:
Weighted average common shares outstanding...........  6,005,444     5,789,216      5,982,396      4,450,253
Incremental shares from outstanding stock options and
  warrants as determined under the treasury stock
  method.............................................   372,266        586,235        372,266        586,235
                                                       --------     ----------     ----------     ----------
Shares as adjusted...................................  6,377,710     6,375,451      6,354,662      5,036,488
                                                       ========     ==========     ==========     ==========
Net income per share.................................     $0.10          $0.33          $0.20          $1.06
                                                       ========     ==========     ==========     ==========
 
FULLY DILUTED:
Net Income...........................................  $653,210     $2,115,708     $1,265,654     $5,315,464
                                                       ========     ==========     ==========     ==========
Shares as adjusted:
Weighted average common shares outstanding...........  6,005,444     5,789,216      5,982,396      4,450,253
Incremental shares from outstanding stock options as
  determined under the treasury stock method.........   372,266        586,235        372,266        586,235
                                                       --------     ----------     ----------     ----------
Shares as adjusted...................................  6,377,710     6,375,451      6,354,662      5,036,488
                                                       ========     ==========     ==========     ==========
Net income per share.................................     $0.10          $0.33          $0.20          $1.06
                                                       ========     ==========     ==========     ==========
</TABLE>
----

----

| (1)    | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period      ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company.                                                                                                                     |

| Date:      July 25, 2008 | /s/ Joseph L.      Sullivan        |
|------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                               | Joseph      L. Sullivan            |
|                               | President                          |
|                               | (principal      executive officer) |

----

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sabine Pass LNG, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Don A. Turkleson, Chief Financial Officer of Sabine Pass LNG-GP, Inc., the general partner of the
Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 26, 2009



|                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                             
|/s/ Don A. Turkleson                                                                         
|Don A. Turkleson                                                                             
|Chief Financial Officer of Sabine Pass LNG-GP, Inc., general partner of Sabine Pass LNG, L.P.
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 52

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to protect

the rights of victims of crime.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 22, 1996

Mr. KYL (for himself, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. HATCH, and Mr. CRAIG) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to protect the rights of victims of crime.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the follow4 ing article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitu5 tion of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents

6 and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by

7 the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States with8 in seven years after the date of its submission for ratifica9 tion:
2

SJ 52 IS

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. To ensure that the victim is treated with

3 fairness, dignity, and respect, from the occurrence of a

4 crime of violence and other crimes as may be defined by

5 law pursuant to section 2 of this article, and throughout

6 the criminal, military, and juvenile justice processes, as

7 a matter of fundamental rights to liberty, justice, and due

8 process, the victim shall have the following rights: to be

9 informed of and given the opportunity to be present at

10 every proceeding in which those rights are extended to the

11 accused or convicted offender; to be heard at any proceed12 ing involving sentencing, including the right to object to

13 a previously negotiated plea, or a release from custody;

14 to be informed of any release or escape; and to a speedy

15 trial, a final conclusion free from unreasonable delay, full

16 restitution from the convicted offender, reasonable meas17 ures to protect the victim from violence or intimidation

18 by the accused or convicted offender, and notice of the

19 victim’s rights.

20 ‘‘SECTION 2. The several States, with respect to a

21 proceeding in a State forum, and the Congress, with re22 spect to a proceeding in a United States forum, shall have

23 the power to implement further this article by appropriate

24 legislation.’’.

Æ
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Blanca Mirriam Sanchez RIVERA a/k/a La Cincuentona, a/k/a Blanca Miriam Sanchez Rivera, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-4201

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 18, 2018

Decided: January 22, 2018

*210Allen H. Orenberg, ORENBERG LAW FIRM, PC, North Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellant. Stephen M. Schenning, Acting United States Attorney, Elizabeth S. Boi-son, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Ray D. McKenzie, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee,

' Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Blanca Mirriam Sanchez Rivera seeks to appeal her conviction and sentence. On appeal, Rivera argues that her guilty plea was not knowing and voluntary because she did not understand the consequences of her plea and lacked the mental competence to enter a valid plea. She also asserts that the district court imposed an unreasonable sentence and that the appeal waiver contained in her plea agreement is invalid. The Government has sought to dismiss the appeal as barred by the waiver of the right to appeal included in the plea agreement.

“The validity of a waiver of appeal ... is reviewed de novo, and we will enforce the waiver if it is valid and the issue appealed is within the scope of the waiver.” *United States v. Adams,*814 F.3d 178, 182 (4th Cir. 2016). “In the absence of extraordinary circumstances, a properly conducted [Fed. R. Crim. P.] 11 colloquy establishes the validity of the waiver.” *Id.*The transcript of the Rule 11 hearing reveals no extraordinary circumstances, that the district court correctly found that Rivera was competent to enter a guilty plea, and that her plea was knowing and voluntary. Further, the district court specifically questioned Rivera about the appeal waiver, and she knowingly and voluntarily agreed to the waiver. Finally, the issues Rivera seeks to raise on appeal fall squarely within the compass of her waiver of appellate rights. We therefore dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          17,979
<SECURITIES>                                    14,247
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,323
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,097
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,515
<PP&E>                                          16,373
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,695
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  58,443
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,019
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           199
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,870
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    58,443
<SALES>                                         18,156
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,156
<CGS>                                            5,168
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,197
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,562
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (385)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,218)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       128
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,346)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,346)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)
        

</TABLE>