alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 18 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 18

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 6, 1997

      Received and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Congratulating the people of the Republic of Nicaragua on the success 
        of their democratic elections held on October 20, 1996.

Whereas on October 20, 1996, the people of the Republic of Nicaragua held truly 
        democratic, multiparty elections to choose their government;
Whereas these elections were deemed by international and domestic observers to 
        be free and fair and a legitimate expression of the will of the people 
        of the Republic of Nicaragua;
Whereas on January 10, 1997, Arnoldo Aleman was peacefully sworn in to the 
        office of President of the Republic of Nicaragua and immediately 
        promised to continue down the path to democracy, national reconciliation 
        and reconstruction that was started by the previous administration of 
        President Violeta Barrios de Chamorro; and
Whereas this historic event of democratic elections in the Republic of Nicaragua 
        and the inauguration of President Arnoldo Aleman should be honored: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) congratulates the people of the Republic of Nicaragua 
        for the successful completion of the historic democratic, 
        multiparty elections held on October 20, 1996;
            (2) congratulates former President Violeta Barrios de 
        Chamorro for her personal courage and her commitment to 
        democracy, which have helped her achieve a profound political 
        and economic transition in the Republic of Nicaragua;
            (3) encourages all Nicaraguans to continue to work together 
        after taking this critical step on the long road to lasting 
        peace and democracy;
            (4) recognizes that all Nicaraguans should continue to work 
        together in order to ensure a stable democracy, respect for 
        human rights, a free and market-oriented economy, and social 
        justice for all people;
            (5) reaffirms the commitment of the United States to help 
        the Republic of Nicaragua move toward freedom and democracy; 
        and
            (6) further reaffirms that the United States is strongly 
        committed to encouraging democracy and peaceful development 
        throughout the Western Hemisphere.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 5, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       4,104,139
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,948,109
<ALLOWANCES>                                   132,025
<INVENTORY>                                  1,757,104
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,006,165
<PP&E>                                       5,084,516
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,616,579
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,867,220
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,151,984
<BONDS>                                      2,592,312
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,600,000
<COMMON>                                    19,719,454
<OTHER-SE>                                (13,196,530)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,867,220
<SALES>                                      6,663,479
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,633,479
<CGS>                                        4,550,124
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,292,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             829,365
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,972,715)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,972,715)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.29)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CleanTech Innovations, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Sheng Ma , Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m or §78o(d)); and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: September 29, 2011
By:
/s/ Sheng MaSheng Ma

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)





This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 35.8



|     |  |  |                                           |                
|---- |  |  | ----------------------------------------- | ---------------
|LOGO |  |  |                                           | CMBS Department
|     |  |  | MAC N9401-011                            
|     |  |  | 1055 10th Avenue SE Minneapolis, MN
55414

Citibank, N.A.

388 Greenwich
Street

14th Floor

New York, New York 10013



|RE: | Annual Statement of Compliance for WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2014-
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------

C22 Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-C22

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014 (the
Agreement), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian (Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the Reporting
Period):

(a) A review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has
been made under such officers supervision; and

(b) To the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.



|              
|--------------
|March 17, 2016
|              
|LOGO          
|GAIL VANNEST  
|Vice President



LOGO
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 127 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 127

      To express the sense of the Senate on border crossing fees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 25 (legislative day, May 15), 1995

Ms. Snowe submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      To express the sense of the Senate on border crossing fees.
Whereas in the budget of the United States for fiscal year 1996 that was 
        submitted to Congress, the President proposed to impose and collect a 
        border crossing fee for individuals and vehicles entering the United 
        States;
Whereas both the Canadian and Mexican governments have expressed opposition to 
        the imposition and collection of such a fee and have raised the 
        possibility of imposing retaliatory border crossing fees of their own;
Whereas the imposition and collection of such a fee would have adverse affects 
        on tourism and commerce that depend on travel across the borders of the 
        United States;
Whereas the imposition and collection of such a fee would have such effects 
        without addressing illegal immigration in a meaningful way;
Whereas on February 22, 1995, the President modified his proposal making the 
        imposition of the new fees voluntary on United States border States (but 
        tied the availability of Federal funds to improve border crossing 
        infrastructure on their willingness to impose such fees); and
Whereas on May 4, 1995, the President further modified the border crossing fee 
        proposal in immigration control legislation he submitted to Congress 
        setting a $1.50 per car and $.75 per pedestrian fee structure: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the United States 
Government should not impose or collect a border crossing fee along its 
borders with Canada and Mexico.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jack GOSSETT, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-11607

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 11, 2017

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Kathryn Rumsey, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Loren C. Green, Green Law Texas, P.C., Arlington, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Defendant appeals his conviction for conspiring to commit drug trafficking. The evidence supports Defendant’s involvement with a group of traders and sellers of methamphetamine, particularly helping drug traffickers getting paid.

The only complaint of this appeal is the admission of evidence by a veteran law-enforcement officer experienced in investigating drug-trafficking crime. Officer Crum had been in law enforcement for twenty years and, for eight of those years as a task force officer to enforce drug crimes. He testified that he had been in “well over a thousand interviews or de*338briefings” with drug dealers, reviewed “countless” text messages of drug dealers, and assisted in undercover operations, and communicated with cooperators.

When defense counsel first objected to Crum’s testimony as not justified as that of an expert witness, the judge instructed the jury of the law allowing a witness to give an opinion when based on training and experience, and then Officer Crum was permitted to develop his background and experience with this conspiracy and many others. The judge also instructed the jury on the difference between expert opinion and lay testimony.

Defense counsel made no other objections to this testimony but was allowed to cross examine Officer Crum about the basis for particular explanation of the language of communication between the Defendant and other members of the conspiracy.

The admissibility of the testimony of Officer Crum is support by legal precedent. *See United States v. Haines,*803 F.3d 713 (5th Cir. 2015) and *United States v. Akins,*746 F.3d 590 (5th Cir. 2014).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir, R. 47.5.4.
#### Andre JUSTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lindsay Ann Marie BRENNAN; Lindsay Ann Marie Phillips, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-1868

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 21, 2017

Decided: November 27, 2017

Andre Juste, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Andre Juste seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his civil action related to child custody. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a'notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” *Bowles v. Russell,*551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on January 10, 2017. The notice of appeal was filed on July 10, 2017.* Because Juste failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We deny Juste’s motion for a child custody order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*

*

 For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); *Houston v. Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988). Juste’s notice of appeal filing was undated, but the mailing envelope was postmarked July 10, 2017.
#### Brian K. FAILON, Debtor-Appellant, v. COMPASS CHEMICAL INTERNATIONAL, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee.

No. 17-1709

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 29, 2018

Decided: February 12, 2018

Richard F. Hawkins, III, THE HAWKINS LAW FIRM, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Jennifer J. West, James Donaldson, SPOTTS FAIN, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

*142Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Brian K. Failon appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order determining that his debt to Compass Chemical International, LLC, is nondischargeable in his Chapter 7 proceeding under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6). We have reviewed the record included on appeal, as well as the parties’briefs, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Failon v. Compass Chem. Int’l, LLC,*No. 3:16-cv-00926-JAG, 2017 WL 1854673 (E.D. Va. May 8, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**I, Anthony A. Scalese, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of QualMark Corporation (the “smallbusiness issuer”);  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC release34-47986.]c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 10, 2007                                                                     /s/ Anthony A. Scalese   Anthony A. Scalese   Chief Financial Officer &Principal Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarterly 
period ended August 31, 1996, and is qualified in its 
entirety by reference to such document.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                            <C>
<CURRENCY>                           U.S. DOLLARS
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                        JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 1
<CASH>                                    969,813
<SECURITIES>                            6,641,088
<RECEIVABLES>                          10,193,761
<ALLOWANCES>                            1,245,360
<INVENTORY>                               200,066
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       19,803,499
<PP&E>                                  4,832,922
<DEPRECIATION>                          3,027,006
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         25,607,171
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   7,067,666
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<COMMON>                                   64,664 
<OTHER-SE>                             18,474,841
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           25,607,171
<SALES>                                 6,693,596
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        6,693,596
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           3,693,013
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          605,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           483,685
<INCOME-TAX>                              191,469
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       292,216
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              292,216
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .05
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 90A/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.090.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 90A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 538 April 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.090.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 90A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 538 April 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 090A/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — third supplement to the 28th complete edition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2010/C 090A/01

Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — third supplement to the 28th complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
January 5, 2011

MEMORANDUM TO: EPA Docket # EPA- HQ - OAR- 2009 - 0211 FROM: Robert Anderson , Environmental Protection Specialist , EPA /OAR/OTAQ/CISD RE: Data from pre - Tier 2 DOE Catalyst Durability Program (V4/CRC E - 87 - 2) Attached is an Excel spreadsheet that con tains data from the DOE Catalyst Durability Test Program also referred to as the DOE V4 program or the CRC E - 87 - 2 program. These data are results for the pre -Tier 2 vehicle portion of the test program. The enclosed spreadsheet contains all data for non -Ti er 2 vehicles submitted to EPA from DOE as of January 5 , 2010. These data include all DOE pre -Tier 2 test data that were a part of the preliminary data set EPA submitted to the docket on November 17, 2010 ( see Docket ID EPA - HQ- OAR - 2009 - 0211 - 14045) as well as additional data collected since that time . As was the case in the original waiver decision ( see Docket ID EPA - HQ- OAR - 0211 - 14019), some (i.e. for the 2000 Honda Accord aged on E0) non - methane organic gases values may need to be recalculated and will be posted shortly. It should be noted that these data could be subject to change based on ongoing QA/QC . For more information, please contact Robert Anderson at either anderson.robert@epa.gov or (202) 343 - 9 718 .