alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 728 Engrossed in House (EH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 728

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 7050 Highway BB in Cedar Hill, Missouri, as the ``Sergeant First 
               Class William B. Woods, Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERGEANT FIRST CLASS WILLIAM B. WOODS, JR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 7050 Highway BB in Cedar Hill, Missouri, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Sergeant First Class William B. Woods, Jr. Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
First Class William B. Woods, Jr. Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 15, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 728

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 7050 Highway BB in Cedar Hill, Missouri, as the ``Sergeant First 
               Class William B. Woods, Jr. Post Office''.
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

The undersigned executive officer of FirstFederal Bancshares of Arkansas, Inc. (the “Registrant”) hereby certifiesthat the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended September 30,2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained thereinfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.

 

 
|                               | By:    | /s/ Larry J. Brandt     |
|------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                               |   | Larry J. Brandt         |
|                               |   | Chief Executive Officer |
|                               |   |                    |
| Date:  November 23, 2009 |   |                    |

 

----
| (1)    | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.                                                                                                            |

| Date: May 6, 2010 | /s/ Joseph L. Sullivan        |   |
|-------------------|-------------------------------|--------|
|              | Joseph L. Sullivan            |   |
|              | President and General Manager |   |
|              | (principal executive officer) |   |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and Publications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. Due to unavoidable delays in this year's approval process, we will not be able to meet the 15-calendar notice threshold, but this meeting will still be open. This meeting will still be held via teleconference.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, March 31, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Fred Smith at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 317-3087.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and Publications Project Committee will be held Thursday, March 31, 2022, at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with Fred Smith. For more information, please contact Fred Smith at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 317-3087, or write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

Dated: March 17, 2022.

Kevin Brown,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2022-06112 Filed 3-22-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 2 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 2

 Informing the House of Representatives that a quorum of the Senate is 
                               assembled.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Daschle submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Informing the House of Representatives that a quorum of the Senate is 
                               assembled.

    Resolved, That the Secretary inform the House of Representatives 
that a quorum of the Senate is assembled and that the Senate is ready 
to proceed to business.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Carlos MUCHADO, a/k/a Francisco Javier Montesrein-Rodriguez, a/k/a Lois K, a/k/a Lex, a/k/a Luis Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-7089

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 15, 2018

Decided: February 16, 2018

Luis Carlos Muchado, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Patrick Hudson, Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant United States Attorneys, Adam Small, Newport News, Virginia, Jerome M. Maiatico, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Joseph Kevin Wheatley, *186UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Luis Carlos Muchado seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2263(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief- on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Muchado has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-50921

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

PEDRO MORALES-DOMINGUEZ, also known as Gerardo Vitela-Olvera,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:10-CR-1596-1

Before BENAVIDES, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Pedro Morales-Dominguez was convicted of illegal reentry into the United

States and sentenced to serve 82 months in prison. He now challenges his

sentence as unreasonable. Under Morales-Dominguez’s view, his sentence is

greater than necessary to achieve the aims of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) because double

counting of his prior illegal entry offenses resulted in an overstated criminal

history, because he came here to help his former wife, and because he had lived

in this country for a long time. Additionally, he complains that the illegal

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

September 12, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-50921 Document: 00511984351 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/12/2012
No. 11-50921

reentry Guideline is not empirically based and that the guidelines range is too

harsh because his offense was only a trespass. Because Morales-Dominguez did

not object to his sentence, we review his arguments for plain error only. See

United States v. Peltier, 505 F.3d 389, 391-92 (5th Cir. 2007).

Under this standard, the appellant must show a forfeited error that is

clear or obvious and that affects his substantial rights. Puckett v. United States,

556 U.S. 129, 134-35 (2009). If he makes such a showing, this court has the

discretion to correct the error but will do so only if it seriously affects the

fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. Id. This

standard has not been met.

Insofar as Morales-Dominguez argues that the district court erred by not

according enough weight to certain sentencing factors, this argument amounts

to no more than a disagreement with the district court’s weighing of these

factors, which shows no error in connection with the sentence imposed. See

United States v. Cooks, 589 F.3d 173, 186 (5th Cir. 2009); see also United States

v. Ruiz, 621 F.3d 390, 398 (5th Cir. 2010); United States v. Gomez-Herrera, 523

F.3d 554, 565-66 (5th Cir. 2008). To the extent he contends that this court

should reweigh the § 3553(a) factors, we decline to do so. See United States v.

Campos-Maldonado, 531 F.3d 337, 339 (5th Cir. 2008). The remaining

arguments raised by Morales-Dominguez are unavailing because they have been

rejected by this court on prior occasions. See United States v. Duarte, 569 F.3d

528, 529-30 (5th Cir. 2009); United States v. Aguirre-Villa, 460 F.3d 681, 683

(5th Cir. 2006); United States v. Calbat, 266 F.3d 358, 364 (5th Cir. 2001). The

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 11-50921 Document: 00511984351 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/12/2012
Dear Sir or Madam, 

The requested relief from the applicable portions of 14 C.F.R. Part 137 you mentioned were already 

submitted in the original exemption submitted on March 11, 2016 on pages 5, 16, 24 and 25, Docket No. 

FAA–2016–4931. We are well aware of the requirements of persons seeking either a private or 

commercial agricultural aircraft operation and have advised our clients accordingly of the procedures 

and regulations. 

Further, there are no part 107 regulations to seek relief from, as this aircraft with full payload exceeds 

the 55lb limit and thus falls under Tier 3 operations requiring a Section 333 approval as previously noted 

in my September 12, 2016 email. Page 7 of the original exemption describes the weight characteristics 

of the system and delineates some of the safety features. Other key operational capabilities are also 

listed on pages 4 and 5.

The only verbiage within the original exemption that is no longer applicable is the 200 foot vice 400 

foot limitation, because the exemption has been in queue for so long, that the 200 foot limitation no 

longer applies under Section 333 exemptions or under Part 107. 

Attached is the original Petition for Exemption taken for action by the FAA on March 11, 2016 already 

containing the requested relief of applicable portions of part 137 as well as why granting the request is 

in the public interest, and “the reasons why granting the exemption would not adversely affect safety, 

or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rules 

under 14 C.F.R. § 11.81.

Because the 200 foot AGL limitation no longer applies, I will submit a change to that particular portion 

and submit it to the docket and supply you with that tracking number. 

 As an owner of a UAS consulting company that takes pride in providing professional services to our 

clients with emphasis on safe integration, it is unsatisfactory that it has been over 6 months since this 

petition has been submitted, and the response to my inquiry requests information that was already 

submitted in the original Petition. 

Sincerely, 

Kelly Neubecker, CEO

Uasolutions Group, Inc.
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 39

Providing for the ‘‘State of the Union’’ address by the President of the

United States.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 22, 1996

Mr. DOLE submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was considered

and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for the ‘‘State of the Union’’ address by the

President of the United States.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That the two Houses of Congress assemble

3 in the Hall of the House of Representatives on Tuesday,

4 January 23, 1996, at 9 p.m., for the purpose of receiving

5 such communication as the President of the United States

6 shall be pleased to make to them.

Æ
8. In Column H, enter the text of your comment following these guidelines:

7. In Column G, input the Figure number if your comment pertains to a Figure. If it does not pertain to a figure, just leave the 

6. In Column F, input the Table number if your comment pertains to a Table. If it does not pertain to a table, just leave the c

5. In Column E, input the line number on which your comment ends.

o Focus primarily on substantive rather than editorial comments, as this document will go through additional rev

number of shorter hard copy products.

o Provide clear action for the authors to revise

o Keep a diplomatic tone

o Avoid writing in the first person

o Write in complete sentences

4. In Column D, input the page number on which your comment ends.

3. In Column C, input the line number on which your comment starts.

2. In Column B, input the page number on which your comment starts.

1. In Column A, input a Chapter number (1 through 9)

2014 U.S. CLIMATE ACTION R
t pertain to a figure, just leave the cell blank.

pertain to a table, just leave the cell blank.

ent will go through additional review and layout prior to development of the final interactive electronic document and a 

U.S. CLIMATE ACTION REPORT
 document and a 
Chapter From 

Page

From Line To Page To Line Table Figure

2014 U.S. CLIMATE ACTION REPORT
Comment

2014 U.S. CLIMATE ACTION REPORT
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 26, 2012

p0319 

# Order

March 26, 2012

144202

DONITA NUGENT, Personal Representative of the Estate of KENNETH ST. ONGE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 144202 COA: 299255 Presque Isle CC: 10-083445-DO NANCY ST. ONGE, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 25, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB UNDER THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

|   | Re: | HSBC Home Equity Loan Trust (USA) 2006-4 |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------|

I, Dennis J. Mickey, Chief Operating Officer – Treasury of HSBC Finance Corporation (the “Company”), pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB under the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 3.10(a) of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of December 14, 2006 (the “Agreement”), among HSBC Home Equity Loan Corporation I, as Depositor, the Company, as Servicer, HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as Administrator, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, hereby certify that:

 

|   | 1. | A review of the activities of the Company from December 14, 2006 through December 31, 2006 and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period referred to above except as set forth below: |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | NONE |
|--------|------|

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate on behalf of the Company this 5th day of March 2007.                   

 

HSBC Finance Corporation

 

 

|   | By: | /s/ Dennis J. Mickey |
|--------|-----|----------------------|

|   | Name: | Dennis J. Mickey |
|--------|-------|------------------|

|   | Title: | Chief Operating Officer – Treasury |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)Certifications.

 

 

I, Helaine M. Kaplan, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Kand all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the periodcovered by this report on Form 10-K of the COMM 2014-UBS6 Mortgage Trust (the"Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Actperiodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of thedistribution, servicing and other information required to be provided underForm 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Actperiodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicercompliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB,and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicershave fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all materialrespects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and theirrelated attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteriafor asset-backed securities required to be included in this report inaccordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described insuch reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I havereasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliatedparties:

 

KeyBank National Association, as MasterServicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association,as Special Servicer prior to October 7, 2022, LNR Partners, LLC, asSpecial Servicer on and after October 7, 2022, Wells FargoBank, National Association, as Trustee and Certificate Administrator, WellsFargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, asOperating Advisor, Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC, as Primary Servicer, ComputershareTrust Company, National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for theCertificate Administrator, and Computershare Trust Company, NationalAssociation, as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian.

 

 

 

Dated: March 13, 2023

 

 

/s/ Helaine M. Kaplan

Helaine M. Kaplan

President

(senior officer in charge of securitization of thedepositor)