alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 11-9684.

#### Woolridge *v.*Fakhoury, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 187

To express the sense of the Senate that Congress should vote on the deployment of United States Armed Forces in the Republic of Bosnia and

Herzegovina.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 20 (legislative day, OCTOBER 18), 1995

Mr. FEINGOLD submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Foreign Relations

RESOLUTION

To express the sense of the Senate that Congress should

vote on the deployment of United States Armed Forces

in the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that Con2 gress should vote on a measure regarding deployment of

3 U.S. Armed Forces in the Republic of Bosnia and

4 Herzegovina as part of the Implementation Force of the

5 North Atlantic Treaty Organization, prior to the United

6 States entering into a commitment to carry out such

7 deployment.

Æ
EXHIBIT
32.1



Certification

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (A) and (B) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code)



Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code), the undersigned officer of Giggles N’ Hugs, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify with respect to
the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 30, 2018
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), that:



(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|Date:
    April 22, 2019 | /s/
    Joey Parsi                 
|------------------------ | -----------------------------------
|                         | Joey
    Parsi                     
|                         | Principal
    Executive Officer    
|                         | and
    Principal Financial Officer











EXHIBIT
32.1



Certification

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (A) and (B) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code)



Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code), the undersigned officer of Giggles N’ Hugs, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify with respect to
the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 30, 2018
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), that:



(3) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(4) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|Date:
    April 22, 2019 |                                        
|------------------------ | ---------------------------------------
|                         |                                        
|                         | /s/
    Philip Gay                     
|                         | Philip Gay                             
|                         | Co- Principal Executive
    Officer    
|                         | and Co- Principal
    Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 981 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 337
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 981

                          [Report No. 104-235]

    Entitled the ``Truck Safety and Congressional Partnership Act''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 28 (legislative day, June 19), 1995

 Mr. Exon (for himself and Mrs. Boxer) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

            February 20 (legislative day, February 7), 1996

               Reported by Mr. Pressler without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    Entitled the ``Truck Safety and Congressional Partnership Act''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be referred to as the ``Truck Safety and Congressional 
Partnership Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. SINGLE TRAILER LENGTH.

    Any Federal regulatory standard for single trailer length issued 
pursuant to negotiations and procedures authorized under the North 
American Free Trade Agreement, shall not exceed fifty-three feet.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 337

104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                 S. 981

                          [Report No. 104-235]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

    Entitled the ``Truck Safety and Congressional Partnership Act''.

_______________________________________________________________________

            February 20 (legislative day, February 7), 1996

                       Reported without amendment
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 15.1




           The Board of Directors
           PowerCerv Corporation


           We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration
           Statement (Form S-8 Nos. 333-3960, 333-50621 and 333-90827)
           pertaining to the PowerCerv Corporation 1995 Stock Option Plan and
           (Form S-8 No. 333-90825) pertaining to Stock Option Agreements of our
           report dated April 13, 2000 relating to the unaudited condensed
           consolidated interim financial statements of PowerCerv Corporation
           that is included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
           2000.

           Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 our reports are
           not a part of the registration statement prepared or certified by
           accountants within the meaning of Section 7 or 11 of the Securities
           Act of 1933.



                                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


           Tampa, Florida
           April 13, 2000

                                       21
Exhibit








Form of Schedule I (Stock Option Award with Relative TSR Vesting)
Performance Condition


Performance Period:  [   ]
TSR Multiplier


	
		
	Relative TSR Percentile
	TSR Multiplier

	[  ] Percentile or Above
	100%

	[  ] Percentile
	67%

	[  ] Percentile
	33%

	Below [  ] Percentile
	0%












Relative TSR Condition


TSR Multiplier:  The applicable multiplier percentage for purposes of determining the number of Vested Options based on the Company’s actual Relative TSR Percentile, as set forth on the table set forth above.


TSR Measurement Period:  [  ].


Relative TSR Percentile:  The Relative TSR Percentile shall be the Company’s Total Shareholder Return (as calculated below) during the TSR Measurement Period, ranked as a percentile as compared to the Total Shareholder Return of the other companies within the Peer Group.  For the avoidance of doubt, if the Relative TSR Percentile is below [  ] percentile, then all outstanding Options shall be forfeited and immediately cancelled.


Relative TSR Condition:  Achievement of a Relative TSR Percentile corresponding to a TSR Multiplier that is at least at threshold performance level (i.e., [  ] percentile or above).


Total Shareholder Return: means, with respect to any company, an amount (expressed as a percentage return) equal to:


(i) the sum of (x) the Ending Stock Price minus the Beginning Stock Price, plus (y) the amount of any dividends and distributions paid on a per share basis (calculated as if such dividends had been reinvested in the applicable company’s common stock on the applicable dividend date) cumulatively over the performance period,


divided by


(ii) the Beginning Stock Price.


Beginning Stock Price: means, with respect to any company, the average closing price per share of common stock for the twenty (20) trading days immediately prior to the first trading day of the TSR Measurement Period.


Ending Stock Price: means, with respect to any company, the average closing price per share of common stock for the twenty (20) trading days immediately prior to the last day of the TSR Measurement Period.













Peer Group: means the following companies:


[       ]
Any company in the Peer Group that ceases to be publicly held during the TSR Measurement Period (i) due to bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization, shall remain in the Peer Group for purposes of calculation of the Relative TSR Percentile (with such company deemed to have a Total Shareholder Return of -100% and ranked at the bottom of the Peer Group) or (ii)  due to a merger, sale, acquisition, business combination or other similar event, shall be excluded from the Peer Group for purposes of calculation of the Relative TSR Percentile.
Exhibit 32

             NEVSTAR GAMING AND ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION


Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report") by Nevstar Gaming and
Entertainment Corporation, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

       1.    The Report complies in all material respects with the requirements
             of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
             as amended, and

       2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Registrant.


                                            /s/ William O. Fleischman
                                            ___________________
                                            Chief Executive Officer and
                                            Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-30537

Conference Calendar

 

JOHN R. BUEHLER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RICHARD STALDER; JARED MADERIES,

Defendants-Appellees.

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CV-1678

---------------------

August 24, 1999

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

John Buehler appeals the district court’s dismissal of his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for

failure to state a claim for relief. He argues that the

confiscation of his driver’s license by Louisiana State Police

Officer Jared Maderies violated his due process rights. Viewing

Buehler’s factual allegations in the light most favorable to him,

he has failed to state a claim for relief. See Spiller v. City

of Texas City, Police Dep’t, 130 F.3d 162, 164 (5th Cir. 1997). 
No. 98-30537

- 2 -

Buehler’s driver’s license was suspended by the State of

Mississippi and Officer Maderies merely acted to enforce that

prior suspension in accordance with Louisiana law. The judgment

of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 11


                     STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF PRO FORMA
                       NET INCOME PER COMMON AND COMMON
                               EQUIVALENT SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              Average Shares Outstanding
                                                                  As of December 31,    
                         Shares                               --------------------------
                         Issued              Issue Date                 1996
                        ---------           -----------             -----------
<S>                     <C>                 <C>                      <C>
Common Stock            3,122,448                (a)                  3,122,448
Common Stock               15,000            10/3/95                     15,000
Common Stock            3,600,000            9/29/95 (b)              3,600,000
Common Stock              426,000           12/12/95 (b)                426,000
Common Stock            4,000,000            3/22/96 (c)              4,000,000
Common Stock              309,000            3/22/96 (d)                309,000
Common Stock              251,970                 (e)                   194,575
Common Stock               22,679                 (f)                    22,679
Common Stock              424,444                 (g)                   424,444
Common Stock              125,556                 (g)                   125,556
Common Stock            1,175,000                 (g)                 1,175,000 
Options                       N/A                 (h)                 1,599,550
                                                                    -----------
                                                                     15,014,252
                                                                    ===========
</TABLE>




Method Used For Calculation

(a) Represents Common Stock issued in connection with the recapitalization of
    Eagle River Interactive, Inc. in 1995.

(b) Originally issued as Series A Preferred Stock and converted to Common Stock
    in 1996.  Calculation assumes conversion on the date of issuance.

(c) Shares issued in conjunction with the Company's initial public offering.

(d) Shares issued to the underwriters in conjunction with the Company's initial
    public offering.

(e) Shares issued upon exercise of stock options at various dates throughout
    1996 and 1997.

(f) Shares issued pursuant to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan at various dates
    throughout 1996 and 1997.

(g) Shares issued in connection with the Graphic Media, Inc. and Mastering 
    Computers, Inc. mergers.

(h) Common stock equivalent shares calculated using the treasury stock method.
Exhibit 35.6



|     |  |  |                                            |                         
|---- |  |  | ------------------------------------------ | ------------------------
|LOGO |  |  |                                            | Corporate Trust Services
|     |  |  | MAC R1204-010                             
|     |  |  | 9062 Old Annapolis Road Columbia, MD
21045
|     |  |  | Tel: 410 884 2000                         
|     |  |  | Fax: 410 715 2380                         

Citibank, National Association

388 Greenwich Street

14th Floor

New York, New York 10013



|Re: | Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-C22
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014 (the Agreement), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator (Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the Reporting Period):

(a) A review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such
officers supervision; and

(b) To the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

March 1, 2017



|              
|--------------
|LOGO          
|BRIAN SMITH   
|Vice President



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
#### Gregory C. BONTEMPS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GODINA, Correctional Officer, California State Prison, in his/her individual capacity, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-56888

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed December 21, 2017

Gregory C. Bontemps, Pro Se

Cassandra Jean Shryock, Esquire, AGCA — Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument, *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Gregory C. Bontemps, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to pay the filing fee after revoking his in forma pauperis status (“IFP”) on the ground that Bontemps has “three strikes” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Washington v. L.A. Cty. Sheriff’s Dep’t,*833 F.3d 1048, 1054 (9th Cir. 2016). We affirm.

The district court properly revoked Bon-temps’ IFP status because at least three of Bontemps’ prior cases qualified as “strikes” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and Bon-temps did not allege facts demonstrating that he faced imminent danger at the time he filed his complaint. *See Knapp v. Hogan,*738 F.3d 1106, 1109 (9th Cir. 2013) (defining when a case is frivolous or malicious, or fails to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and can be considered a' strike); *Andrews v. Cervantes,*493 F.3d 1047, 1055-57 (9th Cir. 2007) (discussing imminent danger exception); *see also Harris v. Mangum,*863 F.3d 1133, 1143 (9th Cir. 2017) (“[W]hen (1) a district court dismisses a complaint on the ground that it fails to state a claim, (2) the court grants leave to amend, and (3) the plaintiff then fails to file an amended complaint, the dismissal counts as a strike under § 1915(g).”).

Bontemps’ motion seeking appointment of counsel, attached to his opening brief, is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12
 
                       LORAL SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS LTD.
 
          COMPUTATION OF DEFICIENCY OF EARNINGS TO COVER FIXED CHARGES
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)
                                  (UNAUDITED)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                  MARCH 31,
                                                              ------------------
                                                               1999       1998
                                                              -------    -------
<S>                                                           <C>        <C>
Earnings
  Income (loss) before income taxes, equity in net loss of
     affiliates and minority interest.......................  $(4,201)   $ 7,928
  Plus fixed charges:
     Interest expense.......................................   39,447     11,225
     Interest component of rent expense(1)..................    2,122      1,134
  Less: capitalized interest................................   21,811      9,505
                                                              -------    -------
Earnings available to cover fixed charges...................  $15,557    $10,782
                                                              =======    =======
Fixed charges...............................................  $55,371    $31,309
                                                              =======    =======
Deficiency of earnings to cover fixed charges...............  $39,814    $20,527
                                                              =======    =======
</TABLE>
 
---------------
(1) The interest component of rent expense is deemed to be approximately 25% of
    total rent expense.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 268 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 268

 Expressing the sense of the Senate with respect to the summit of Arab 
     heads of state being held in Cairo beginning on June 21, 1996.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 21, 1996

 Mr. Lautenberg (for himself, Mr. Brown, and Mr. Lieberman) submitted 
   the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Senate with respect to the summit of Arab 
     heads of state being held in Cairo beginning on June 21, 1996.

Whereas Benjamin Netanyahu was elected to the position of Prime Minister of 
        Israel on May 29, 1996;
Whereas Prime Minister-elect Netanyahu presented his cabinet for approval to the 
        Israeli Knesset on June 18, 1996;
Whereas the guidelines of the new Government of Israel specifically state: ``The 
        Government of Israel will work to broaden the circle of peace with all 
        of its neighbors.'';
Whereas Egyptian President Mubarak has invited heads of state of Algeria, 
        Bahrain, Comoros, Djibouti, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, 
        Morocco, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, the 
        United Arab Emirates, Yemen, and the Palestine Liberation Organization 
        to attend an Arab summit in Cairo beginning on June 21, 1996; and
Whereas President Clinton has stated his hope that Arab leaders who attend this 
        summit will ``give Mr. Netanyahu an opportunity to constitute his 
        government and set a policy and not presume that we can't pursue 
        peace.'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate urges the governments attending the June 
21, 1996, summit in Cairo, and other governments in the Middle East 
to--
            (1) reaffirm their commitment to a comprehensive peace in 
        the Middle East;
            (2) express their willingness to work with the 
        democratically elected Government of Israel in the pursuit of a 
        meaningful peace; and
            (3) refrain from statements directed against the new 
        Israeli government that might create an atmosphere in the 
        region unfavorable to a continuation of the peace process.
                                 <all>
```