alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1041

JEFFREY KENT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

AMERICAN TENANT SCREEN, INCORPORATED, t/a ATS;

DANIEL STERLING, Representative; TIMOTHY

O'SULLIVAN, Representative,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA97-2838-S)

Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 26, 1998

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey Kent, Appellant Pro Se. Leonard C. Redmond, III, REDMOND,

BURGIN & GUTIERREZ, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his

civil action alleging a violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act,

15 U.S.C. §§ 1681a-t (1994), and a state law claim of defamation.

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. Kent v. American Tenant Screen, Inc., No.

CA-97-2838-S (D. Md. Dec. 9, 1997). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 12
                                                    Form 10-Q
                                                    For the Six
                                                    Months Ended
                                                    March 31, 1997



                            Lucent Technologies Inc.
                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

                              (Dollars in Millions)
                                   (Unaudited)


                                                           For the Six
                                                           Months Ended
                                                          March 31, 1996

Earnings Before Income Taxes...........................       $ 1,506

Less Interest Capitalized during
  the Period...........................................             7
Less Undistributed Earnings of Less than 50%
  Owned Affiliates.....................................             1

Add Fixed Charges......................................           236

Total Earnings ........................................       $ 1,734



Fixed Charges

Total Interest Expense Including Capitalized Interest..         $ 178

Interest Portion of Rental Expense.....................            58

    Total Fixed Charges................................         $ 236

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.....................           7.3
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Ramon TUCKER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-4711

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 30, 2018

Decided: February 1, 2018

Theresa A. Kennedy, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Sherrie Scott Capotosto, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED' STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

*134Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In this appeal filed pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), James Ramon Tucker seeks to challenge his conviction and the 125-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2006). In criminal cases, a defendant must file his notice of appeal within 14 days after the entry of judgment. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A)(i). With or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to 30 days. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); *United States v. Reyes,*759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985).

The district court entered the criminal judgment against Tucker on November 14, 2011. The court later denied Tucker’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion, and we dismissed the appeal of that denial in 2015. *See United States v. Tucker,*600 Fed. Appx. 149 (4th Cir. 2015) (No. 14-7700). Tucker waited until October 24, 2016 to note an appeal from the criminal judgment against him.* Because Tucker failed to file a timely notice of appeal, and since Tucker has completed collateral review of the criminal judgment against him, we exercise our inherent authority to dismiss this appeal sua sponte. *See United States v. Oliver,*878 F.3d 120, 128 (4th Cir. 2017) (holding that this court should sua sponte dismiss an untimely criminal appeal when the appeal is filed “after the defendant has completed collateral review of the same judgment”). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*

*

 For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); *Houston v. Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 276, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).
##### 



Exhibit 10.01
 AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO TO AMENDED AND RESTATED
CREDIT AGREEMENT
 Amendment Parent Zicam Borrower Borrowers Bank
 Original Agreement First Amendment Agreement
   Incorporation
of Recitals.
 Defined
Terms.
 Amendments to Section 1.1.
  Base Lending Rate minus
 Fees
 Note
 1




---



##### 



Revolving
Credit Commitment
 Revolving
Loans Maturity Date
  Unused Revolving Commitment Fee
 Amendment
to Section 2.14.
 Unused Revolving Commitment Fee multiplied by minus plus Money Market
Account
 Replacement of Schedule 5.9.
 New Subsidiary.
 Representations and Warranties.
  2




---



##### 



Conditions Precedent to Effectiveness of Amendment.
       Counterparts;
Telefacsimile Execution.
 3




---



##### 



Integration.
 Reaffirmation of the Agreement.
 [remainder of page intentionally left blank; signatures to follow]
 4




---



##### 



MATRIXX INITIATIVES, INC., a Delaware corporationBy:
    
    /s/ William J. HemeltName:
    
    WILLIAM J. HEMELTTitle:
    
    EVP/CFOZICAM, LLC, an Arizona limited liability companyBy:
    
    /s/ William J. HemeltName:
    
    WILLIAM J. HEMELTTitle:
    
    MANAGER/CFOCOMERICA BANKBy:
    
    /s/ Chris BaroneName:
    
    Chris BaroneTitle:
    
    Commercial Banking Officer
 S-1




---



##### 








---



##### 



CONSENT OF GUARANTORS
 Guarantor Guaranty Bank Borrowers
  ZICAM SWAB PRODUCTS,
LLC,a Delaware limited liability companyBy :
    
    /s/ William HemeltName:
    
    William HemeltTitle:
    
    Manager
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 300 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 300

 To designate the week of November 3, 1996, as ``National Shaken Baby 
                       Syndrome Awareness Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 24, 1996

  Mr. Wellstone (for himself, Mr. Inouye, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Dodd, Mrs. 
  Frahm, Mr. Reid, Mr. Glenn, Mr. Exon, Mrs. Boxer, and Mr. Kennedy) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                            on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To designate the week of November 3, 1996, as ``National Shaken Baby 
                       Syndrome Awareness Week''.

Whereas Shaken Baby Syndrome describes the consequences that occur when a young 
        child is violently shaken;
Whereas Shaken Baby Syndrome is so lethal that 20 to 25 percent of its victims 
        die, and most survivors suffer brain damage;
Whereas Shaken Baby Syndrome accounts for 10 to 12 percent of all child abuse 
        and neglect cases in the United States;
Whereas 25 to 50 percent of teenagers and adults do not know that shaking a baby 
        is dangerous;
Whereas education is the key to preventing this tragedy; and
Whereas the United States Senate has a continuing commitment to the health and 
        safety of this Nation's children: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate designates the week of November 3, 1996, 
as ``National Shaken Baby Syndrome Awareness Week''. The President is 
requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United 
States to observe such week with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

The undersigned executive officer of FirstFederal Bancshares of Arkansas, Inc. (the “Registrant”) hereby certifiesthat the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended September 30,2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained thereinfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.

 

 
|   |                   | By:    | /s/ Sherri R. Billings  |
|--------|------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |                   |   | Sherri R. Billings      |
|   |                   |   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                   |   |                    |
| Date:  | November 30, 2010 |   |                    |

 

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Julio Adolio RIVERA, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40336 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed January 29, 2018

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Michael Lance Herman, Scott Andrew Martin, H. Michael Sokolow, Assistant Federal Public Defenders, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District *214of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Julio Adolio Rivera appeals his guilty plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of cocaine in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2; 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(B)(ii). Rivera argues that the factual basis was insufficient to support his guilty plea conviction because the Government failed to meet its obligation to prove that he knew the type and quantity of drug involved in his offense.

As Rivera concedes, his argument is foreclosed by *United States v. Betancourt,*586 F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that *Flores-Figueroa v. United States,*556 U.S. 646, 129 S.Ct. 1886, 173 L.Ed.2d 853 (2009), did not overturn *United States v. Gamez-Gonzalez,*319 F.3d 695 (5th Cir. 2003), and that the Government is not required to prove knowledge of drug type and quantity as an element of a drug offense.

Accordingly, Rivera’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

**Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________

NO. 09-19-00095-CV

_________________

NISSAN MEXICANA, S.A. DE C.V., Appellant

V.

MELISSA SIAS, INDIVIDUALLY & AS NEXT FRIEND OF TAYLOR J. 

CHARLES, AND TAYLOR J. CHARLES, Appellees

________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 60th District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. B-198,652

________________________________________________________________________

ORDER

On July 16, 2019, appellant, Nissan Mexicana, S.A. de C.V., requested an 

abatement of this accelerated appeal because the parties have reached a tentative 

settlement that includes the resolution of all claims between the parties to the 

accelerated appeal. The appellees, Melissa Sias, individually and as next friend of 

Taylor J. Charles, and Taylor J. Charles, did not oppose an abatement.
2

We abate the appeal until August 23, 2019. If a settlement has been finalized 

by that date, the parties are instructed to file a motion to reinstate and dismiss the 

accelerated appeal in accordance with their settlement agreement. If the parties have 

not finalized a settlement by that date, they are instructed to file a report informing 

this Court about the status of the appeal and requesting an extension of the 

abatement.

Our Order of April 12, 2019, which stayed all further trial court proceedings 

except for mediation, is lifted for the purpose of conducting further proceedings in 

the trial court to effectuate the parties’ settlement agreement.

ORDER ENTERED July 23, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
Exhibit 34.21



LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



| |  |                                                                                                                              
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Audit Tax  Advisory
Grant Thornton LLP
1201 Walnut St, Suite 2200
Kansas City, Missouri 64106 T 816.412.2400
F 816.412.2404

Board of Directors

Situs
Holdings, LLC

We have examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing
Criteria (Managements Assertion), that Situs Holdings, LLC (the Company) complied with servicing criteria set forth in Items 1117, 1119, 1122(d)(3)(i), 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(vii) of the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commissions Regulation AB included in Appendix A as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, with respect to the Companys Operating or Trust Advisor Services performed over the deals listed in Appendix B (the
Platform). Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion about the Companys compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria for the Platform based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Services and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination was not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Companys activities with respect to
the Platform during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing
criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that Situs Holdings, LLC complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2015, for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.



LOGO

Kansas City, Missouri

February 18, 2016
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 20 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 20

   A resolution making majority party appointments to certain Senate 
                   committees for the 104th Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Lott (for Mr. Dole) submitted the following resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   A resolution making majority party appointments to certain Senate 
                   committees for the 104th Congress.

    Resolved, That the following shall constitute the majority party's 
membership on the following standing committees for the 104th Congress, 
or until their successors are chosen:
    Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry: Mr. Lugar, Mr. 
Dole, Mr. Helms, Mr. Cochran, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Craig, Mr. Coverdell, 
Mr. Santorum, and Mr. Warner.
    Committee on Appropriations: Mr. Hatfield, Mr. Stevens, Mr. 
Cochran, Mr. Specter, Mr. Domenici, Mr. Gramm, Mr. Bond, Mr. Gorton, 
Mr. McConnell, Mr. Mack, Mr. Burns, Mr. Shelby, Mr. Jeffords, Mr. 
Gregg, and Mr. Bennett.
                                 <all>
```
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 21

- 00283

- CV

Greg Abbott, in his Official Capacity as Governor of Texas, and Ken Paxton, in his Official Capacity as Attorney General of Texas v. Point Isabel Independent School District

On Appeal from the 444th Dis trict Court of Cameron County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021

- DCL

- 04816

- H

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be DISMISSED . The Court orders the appeal
DISMISSED in accordance wi th its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against the par ty incurring same.
We further order this decision certified below for observance. March 9, 2023
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of FFD Financial Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert R. Gerber, the Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Robert R. Gerber
-----------------------------------------------------
Robert R. Gerber
Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
February 17, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to FFD Financial Corporation and will be retained by FFD Financial
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

MARTIN PENJUKE,

Respondent

v.

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 92 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 27th day of March, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
TKP

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0604

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

PRESTON CSOO ROSSBACH, 

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 15-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time 

to and including December 27, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 4 2023

12/04/2023

Case Number: DA 20-0604
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 15D-14 OF THE SECURITIESEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,AS AMENDED AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Sterling H. McDonald, ChiefFinancial Officer of Natural Gas Systems, Inc., certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Natural Gas Systems, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, thisquarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4. The Registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

 

a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectivenessof the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in this report anychange in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The Registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of Registrant’s Board of Directors:

 

a) All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

DateNovember 16, 2004 

 
|     | */s/ Sterling H. McDonald* |   |
|----------|----------------------------|--------|
|     | *Sterling H. McDonald*     |
| * * | *Chief Financial Officer*  |

 

----
Order entered May 7 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 00856
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF C.S.B AND R.D.B , CHILDREN On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 11
- 151 58 

### O RDER
We GRANT the May 5, 2015 motion of freelance court reporter Micaela Ynostrosa for an extension of time to file a supplemental reporter’s record containing missing exhibits. Ms. Ynostrosa shall file the supplemental reporter’s record by MAY 18, 2015

. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order by electronic transmission to Ms. Ynostrosa, Joie Rivera, Official Court Reporter for the 255th Judicial District Court, and all counsel of record.
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE