alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LORAL SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS LTD. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         876,530
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  452,122
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    129,230
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,557,642
<PP&E>                                       1,669,955
<DEPRECIATION>                                 137,032
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,065,979
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          341,105
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    734,598
<COMMON>                                         2,430
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,225,563
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,065,979
<SALES>                                        543,473
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               568,663
<CGS>                                          568,757
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  568,757
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,277
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (23,371)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,651
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (74,416)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (97,629)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.38)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.38)
<FN>
<F1>Note:  The adoption of SFAS 128 had no effect on reported earnings per
share for the quarter ended June 30, 1998.

<F2>NOTE: THE CAPTION "DEPRECIATION" LISTED ABOVE REPRESENTS ACCUMULATED 
DEPRECIATION.
        

</TABLE>
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 16 Referred in Senate (RFS)]







105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 16


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 12, 1997

      Received and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION


 
  Concerning the urgent need to improve the living standards of those 
   South Asians living in the Ganges and the Brahmaputra River Basin.

Whereas some 400,000,000 people live in Bangladesh, northern India, and Nepal 
        near the Ganges and Brahmaputra Rivers and their tributaries;
Whereas these people comprise the largest concentration of poor people in the 
        world;
Whereas this region lacks the resources, especially the infrastructure, that can 
        pull its residents out of poverty;
Whereas almost every year flooding by the Ganges and Brahmaputra Rivers produces 
        death and destruction, sometimes on a vast scale;
Whereas during the dry seasons, water supplies do not meet the needs of the 
        region's people, especially farmers;
Whereas despite these problems, the region has great potential for development;
Whereas Bangladesh, India, and Nepal have recognized for many years that the 
        water resources of the region, if properly managed, could contribute 
        greatly to the welfare of millions of people in the region;
Whereas the Governments of Bangladesh and India signed a 30-year agreement on 
        December 12, 1996, for the purpose of sharing the water of the Ganges 
        River; and
Whereas in 1996 the Governments of India and Nepal signed and ratified a treaty 
        enabling the joint development of the water resources of the Mahakali 
        River: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) congratulates the Governments of Bangladesh and India 
        for their recent agreement on sharing the water of the Ganges 
        River;
            (2) congratulates the Governments of India and Nepal on 
        their treaty enabling the joint development of the water 
        resources of the Mahakali River;
            (3) respectfully offers its encouragement for the three 
        governments to continue their cooperation which can do much to 
        relieve the poverty of those people living the Ganges and 
        Brahmaputra River Basin; and
            (4) urges international financial institutions, such as the 
        World Bank and the Asian Development Bank, and the 
        international community to offer whatever advice, 
        encouragement, and assistance is appropriate to help in this 
        effort.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 11, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.`
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 165 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 165

  Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Government of Israel 
        should extradite Samuel Sheinbein to the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 1, 1997

 Mrs. Morella submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
          referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Government of Israel 
        should extradite Samuel Sheinbein to the United States.

Whereas Samuel Sheinbein is a legal resident of Montgomery County, Maryland, and 
        a citizen of the United States;
Whereas Samuel Sheinbein has been charged in Montgomery County, Maryland, with 
        the first-degree murder of Alfredo Enrique Tello, Jr.;
Whereas Samuel Sheinbein fled American justice and has since been detained by 
        the Government of Israel; and
Whereas the Government of Israel may prosecute Samuel Sheinbein for the murder 
        of Alfredo Enrique Tello, Jr., rather than extradite him to the United 
        States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) Montgomery County, Maryland, is the most appropriate 
        venue for any prosecution of Samuel Sheinbein for the murder of 
        Alfredo Enrique Tello, Jr.; and
            (2) the Government of Israel should undertake every effort 
        under law to assure that Samuel Sheinbein is extradited to the 
        United States.
                                 <all>
```
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 150

To authorize testimony by Senate employees and representation by Senate

Legal Counsel.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 13 (legislative day, JULY 10), 1995

Mr. DOLE (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize testimony by Senate employees and

representation by Senate Legal Counsel.

Whereas the plaintiffs in Barnstead Broadcasting Corporation and BAF Enterprises, Inc. v. Offshore Broadcasting

Corporation, Civ. No. 94–2167, a civil action pending in

the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, are seeking the deposition testimony of Barbara

Riehle and John Seggerman, Senate employees who work

for Senator John Chafee;

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States

and rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be taken

from such control or possession but by permission of the

Senate;
2

SRES 150 ATS

Whereas when it appears that evidence under the control or

in the possession of the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take such action as will

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges

of the Senate;

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a)

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent employees of the Senate with respect to subpoenas

or requests for testimony issued or made to them in their

official capacities: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That Barbara Riehle and John Seggerman

2 are authorized to provide deposition testimony in the case

3 of Barnstead Broadcasting Corporation and BAF Enter4 prises, Inc. v. Offshore Broadcasting Corporation, except

5 concerning matters for which a privilege should be as6 serted; and

7 SEC. 2. That the Senate Legal Counsel is authorized

8 to represent Barbara Riehle and John Seggerman in con9 nection with the deposition testimony authorized by this

10 resolution.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6374 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6374

To extend the Vietnam Service Medal to veterans of the Armed Forces who 
          participated in the S.S. Mayaguez rescue operation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 17, 2016

  Mr. Meadows (for himself and Ms. Gabbard) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the Vietnam Service Medal to veterans of the Armed Forces who 
          participated in the S.S. Mayaguez rescue operation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Recognizing Mayaguez Veterans Act''.

SEC. 2. AWARD OF VIETNAM SERVICE MEDAL TO VETERANS WHO PARTICIPATED IN 
              MAYAGUEZ RESCUE OPERATION.

    (a) Award Authorized.--The Secretary of the military department 
concerned shall, upon the application by or on behalf of an individual 
who is an eligible veteran, award that individual the Vietnam Service 
Medal, notwithstanding any otherwise applicable requirements for the 
award of that medal. Any such award shall be made in lieu of any Armed 
Forces Expeditionary Medal awarded the individual for the individual's 
participation in the Mayaguez rescue operation.
    (b) Treatment of Deceased Veterans.--In the case of a veteran who 
is deceased, the application described in subsection (a) may be 
submitted by the next of kin of the veteran.
    (c) Eligible Veteran.--For purposes of this section, the term 
``eligible veteran'' means a veteran of the Armed Forces--
            (1) who was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal 
        for participation in military operations known as the Mayaguez 
        rescue operation of May 12-15, 1975; or
            (2) who participated in such operation.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William A. WHITE Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6879

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 21, 2017

Decided: January 11, 2018

William A. White, Appellant Pro Se. C. Patrick Hogeboom, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Laura Day Rottenborn, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.

Before MOTZ, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

*131Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William A. White appeals the district court’s order denying his second motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. White,*No. 7:13-cr-00013-GEC-1, 2017 WL 2378018 (W.D. Va. Conrad, J., May 31, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 168 Indefinitely Postponed Senate (IPS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 168

                          [Report No. 104-137]

  Concerning the Select Committee on Ethics Investigation of Senator 
                          Packwood of Oregon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            September 8 (legislative day, September 5), 1995

   Mr. McConnell, from the Select Committee on Ethics, reported the 
    following original resolution; which was placed on the calendar

                            November 1, 1996

                         Indefinitely postponed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Concerning the Select Committee on Ethics Investigation of Senator 
                          Packwood of Oregon.

    Resolved, That pursuant to article 1, section 5, clause 2 of the 
United States Constitution, Senator Packwood is expelled from the 
Senate for his illegal actions and improper conduct in attempting to 
obstruct and impede the Committee's inquiry; engaging in a pattern of 
sexual misconduct in at least 18 instances between 1969 and 1990; and 
engaging in a plan to enhance his financial position by soliciting, 
encouraging and coordinating employment opportunities for his wife from 
individuals with interests in legislation or issues which he could 
influence.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 12 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 12

  Notifying the House of Representatives of the election of Sheila P. 
                   Burke as Secretary of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Lott submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Notifying the House of Representatives of the election of Sheila P. 
                   Burke as Secretary of the Senate.

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives be notified of the 
election of the Honorable Sheila P. Burke of California, as Secretary 
of the Senate.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, David J. Kornder, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Patina Oil & Gas Corporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: October 28, 2004
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 316

Tendering the thanks of the Senate to the Vice President for the courteous,

dignified, and impartial manner in which he has presided over the deliberations of the Senate.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 3, 1996

Mr. LOTT submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed

to

RESOLUTION

Tendering the thanks of the Senate to the Vice President

for the courteous, dignified, and impartial manner in

which he has presided over the deliberations of the Senate.

1 Resolved, That the thanks of the Senate are hereby

2 tendered to the Honorable Al Gore, Vice President of the

3 United States and President of the Senate, for the cour4 teous, dignified, and impartial manner in which he has

5 presided over its deliberations during the second session

6 of the One Hundred Fourth Congress.

Æ
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ryan Paul TURCOTTE, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40300 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed January 16, 2018

Amy Howell Alaniz, Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Travis Wiley Berry, I, Esq., Attorney, Corpus Christi, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Ryan Paul Turcotte appeals his 120-month sentence imposed in connection *295with his conviction for conspiracy to transport undocumented aliens. He argues that the district court erred in denying him a reduction for acceptance of responsibility under U.S.S.G. § 3El.l(a). The district court denied the reduction, finding that Turcotte falsely denied relevant conduct and committed a crime after entering his guilty plea. On appeal, Turcotte does not challenge the court’s finding that he denied relevant conduct; his argument is limited to challenging the court’s conclusion that he committed a crime post-plea. Turcotte does not challenge the -finding that he made the threats against a federal officer. Instead, he argues that the threats he made against a federal officer occurred prior to his guilty plea and that he had no means to carry out the threats while incarcerated.

We will affirm the denial of a reduction of acceptance of responsibility unless it is “without foundation, a standard of review more deferential than the clearly erroneous standard.” *United States v. Juarez-Duarte,*513 F.3d 204, 211 (5th Cir. 2008) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Regarding the timing of the threats, testimony established that Tur-cotte made statements after he entered his guilty plea indicating his desire to kill an Assistant United States Attorney. As to the assertion that Turcotte was unable to carry out his threats, threatening a federal officer does not require that the offender be able to immediately carry out the threat. *See United States v. Stevenson,*126 F.3d 662, 664-65 (5th Cir. 1997) (“AJI the government had to show was that this threat was intentionally communicated, not that the threat was credible or could be immediately carried out.”). He has not shown that the district court clearly erred in denying him a reduction for acceptance of responsibility. *See Juarez-Duarte,*513 F.3d at 211.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *295published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir, R. 47.5.4.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 112 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 112

       Commending the Senate Enrolling Clerk upon his retirement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               April 27 (legislative day, April 24), 1995

    Mr. Dole (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Commending the Senate Enrolling Clerk upon his retirement.

Whereas Brian Hallen will retire from the United States Senate after almost 30 
        years of Government service;
Whereas he served the United States Senate for over 20 years; the last 9 years 
        as Enrolling Clerk;
Whereas his dedication to the United States Senate resulted in the 
        computerization of the engrossing and enrolling process;
Whereas he has performed the duties of his office with remarkable diligence, 
        perseverance, efficiency and intelligence;
Whereas he has faithfully performed his duties serving all Members of the Senate 
        and House of Representatives with great professional integrity; and
Whereas Brian Hallen has earned the respect, affection and esteem of the United 
        States Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the United States Senate commends Brian Hallen for 
his long, faithful and exemplary service to his country and to the 
Senate.
    Sec. 2. The Secretary shall transmit a copy of this resolution to 
Brian Hallen.
                                 <all>
```