alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

In accordance with Title 42 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Section 217a, notice is hereby given that the Charter for the National Center for Advancing Translational  Sciences Advisory Council was renewed for an additional two-year period on February 7, 2022.

It is determined that the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences Advisory Council  is in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed on the National Institutes of Health by law, and that these duties can best be performed through the advice and counsel of this group.

                    Inquiries may be directed to Claire Harris, Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 1000, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 (Mail Stop Code 4875), Telephone (301) 496-2123, or                     *harriscl@mail.nih.gov.*

Dated: March 4, 2022.

David W. Freeman,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-05029 Filed 3-9-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPI RES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

T.J., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D14-4403 ) C.W.P. III, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed March 16, 2016.

A ppeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Tracy Sheehan, Judge.

A ngela Lynn Leiner of The Law Office of A ngela L. Leiner, P.A., St. Petersburg, for A ppellant. Joseph R. Fritz of Joseph R. Fritz, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.

VILLANTI, Chief Judge.

T.J. (the Mother) appeals the final judgment of paternity and time-sharing entered in this litigation brought by C.W.P. III (the Father). The Mother elected not to provide this court with a complete transcript of the two-day ev identiary hearing, so we are unable to address the majority of the issues she raises in this appeal. Despite this- 2 - deficiency, however, s he is correct that the written final judg ment does not accurately

reflect the trial court's oral r uling as to the Mother's time-s haring. Therefore, on this single point, we reverse and remand for the trial court to ente r a corrected judgment. The transcript in the record is limited to the trial court's o ral ruling made at the conclusion of the second day of the evidentiary hearing. I n its oral ruling, the trial court announced that the Mother would have time-sharing with th e parties' daughter every other weekend from Friday when school let out until Monda y morning. This would presumably allow the Mother to pick up the child from school on Friday afternoon and would give her three overnights every other week. However, the written final judgment gives the Mother time-sharing every other weekend from Friday a t 7 p.m. until Sunday at 7 p.m. Hence, the written judgment clearly differs from the trial court's oral ruling, not only in the time for the exchange of the child, but also in the number of overnights the

Mother will have with the child. This court has previously held that "[r]eversal is required wh ere the final judgment is inconsistent with the trial court's oral pronouncem ent." Brewer v. Brewer, 3 So. 3d 432, 433 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); see also Mahaffey v. Maha ffey, 614 So. 2d 649, 650-51 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Gallardo v. Gallardo, 593 So. 2d 522 , 524 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (reversing the portion of the final judgment concerning v isitation and remanding with directions to conform the written judgment to the court's oral pronouncement); cf. Meyer v. Meyer, 525 So. 2d 462, 464 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988) (noting that the entry of a written judgment that is materially different from the court's oral pronouncement is a substantive error requiring correction). We must therefore rev erse the portion of the final judgment concerning the Mother's weekend time-sharing and remand for the trial- 3 - court to enter an amended final judgment that is consistent wit h its oral ruling. In all other respects, we affirm. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directio ns.

WALLACE and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (a)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD THEN
ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (b) FORM 10-QSB FOR
THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          60,184
<SECURITIES>                                   690,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,917,053
<ALLOWANCES>                                    74,819
<INVENTORY>                                    131,324
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,809,757
<PP&E>                                       1,766,349
<DEPRECIATION>                                 140,085
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,442,536
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,567,281
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,500,000
<COMMON>                                        11,072
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,575,624
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,442,536
<SALES>                                      3,393,505
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,393,505
<CGS>                                          560,207
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  560,207
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,408,529
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              68,356
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (542,068)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (542,068)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (542,068)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)
        

</TABLE>
|   | 1. | I am a duly authorized officer of BMW Financial Services NA, LLC; |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | I have reviewed the terms of that certain Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2014 (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”), among BMW Financial Services NA, LLC, as Seller, Servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”), Administrator and Custodian, U.S. Bank National Association, as Indenture Trustee, BMW FS Securities LLC, as Depositor, and BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2014-A, as Issuer and I have made, or have caused to be made under my supervision, a detailed review of the activities of the Servicer and the performance of its obligations thereunder during the period from October 15, 2014 to December 31, 2014; |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on the review described in paragraph 2, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects during the period from October 15, 2014 to December 31, 2014, except as set forth below. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
----

Action brought on 22 June 2006 — Bakema v Commission

(Case F-68/06)

(2006/C 212/85)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Reint Jacob Bakema (Zuidlaren, the Netherlands) (represented by: L. Rijpkema, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Form of order sought

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, a former member of the so-called local technical assistance staff (ALAT), has been engaged as a member of the contract staff and classified in function group IV, grade 14.

In his action, the applicant claims that the defendant made inaccurate application of the relevant legislation, especially of Article 82 (2) (c) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the Communities (CEOS) and Article 2 of General Implementation Provisions (GIP) 49-2004. The applicant submits that the defendant's interpretation of the term ‘diploma’ contained in those articles is inaccurate and arbitrary. In the calculation of his professional experience, the defendant should have taken into consideration all the activities the applicant carried out after obtaining his ‘kandidaatsdiploma’.

The applicant further claims that, even if he used to be a member of ALAT before his engagement as a member of contract staff, the principle laid down in Article 86 of the CEOS should be applied to his case. According to that principle, where an agent moves to a new post within a function group, he shall not be classified in a lower grade or step than in his former post.

----
#### Keith MILLER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Sheriff Al CANNON, Respondent-Appellee, and Chief Beatty; Scarlett Wilson; Preliminary Hearing Court Transcript Records; Judge Gosnell; Atty Patricia Kennedy, Respondents.

No. 17-7514

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 21, 2017

Decided: December 28, 2017

Keith Miller, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.-

*202Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Keith Miller seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C, § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Miller seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 53 (Friday, March 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 15484]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05747]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD

[Docket No. EP 670 (Sub-No. 1)]

Notice of Rail Energy Transportation Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Rail Energy 
Transportation Advisory Committee (RETAC), pursuant to the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Wednesday, April 20, 2022, at 9:00 
a.m. E.D.T.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Surface Transportation Board 
headquarters at 395 E St. SW, Washington, DC 20423.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristen Nunnally at (202) 245-0312 or 
[email protected]. Assistance for the hearing impaired is 
available through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: RETAC was formed in 2007 to provide advice 
and guidance to the Board, and to serve as a forum for discussion of 
emerging issues related to the transportation of energy resources by 
rail. Establishment of a Rail Energy Transp. Advisory Comm., EP 670 
(STB served July 17, 2007). The purpose of this meeting is to 
facilitate discussions regarding issues including rail service, 
infrastructure planning and development, and effective coordination 
among suppliers, rail carriers, and users of energy resources. 
Potential agenda items for this meeting include a rail performance 
measures review, industry segment updates by RETAC members, and a 
roundtable discussion.
    The meeting, which is open to the public, will be conducted in 
accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C app. 2; 
Federal Advisory Committee Management regulations, 41 CFR part 102-3; 
RETAC's charter; and Board procedures. Further communications about 
this meeting may be announced through the Board's website at 
www.stb.gov.
    Written Comments: Members of the public may submit written comments 
to RETAC at any time. Comments should be addressed to RETAC, c/o 
Kristen Nunnally, at [email protected].
    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 1321, 49 U.S.C. 11101; 49 U.S.C. 11121.

    Decided: March 15, 2022.

    By the Board, Scott Zimmerman, Acting Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Regena Smith-Bernard,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2022-05747 Filed 3-17-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Loral Space & Communications Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Bernard L. Schwartz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Bernard L. Schwartz
------------------------------
Bernard L. Schwartz
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002
#### William Leon BURNETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bryan P. STIRLING; Michael McCall, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-7564

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 15, 2018

Decided: February 20, 2018

William Leon Burnett, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: '

William Leon Burnett appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.* The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Burnett that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of ' the substance of that recommendation ' when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. *Wright v.*Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); *see also Thomas v. Arn,*474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). Burnett has waived appellate review by failing to timely file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*

*

 Although Burnett’s complaint was dismissed without prejudice, we have jurisdiction over this appeal because the grounds for dismissal indicate that mere amendment could not cure the defects in Burnett's case. *See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc.,*807 F.3d 619, 623 (4th Cir. 2015); *Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392,*10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         102,179
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  759,527
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,500
<INVENTORY>                                    140,544
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,122,791
<PP&E>                                         398,550
<DEPRECIATION>                                 117,549
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,853,154
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,227,051
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        508
<COMMON>                                        16,708
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,056,707
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,853,154
<SALES>                                        835,022
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               835,022
<CGS>                                          584,114
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  976,130
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,565
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,020
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (141,108)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (39,500)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (101,608)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (531,238)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (632,846)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Loral
Space & Communications Ltd. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Richard J. Townsend,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the
    requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ RICHARD J. TOWNSEND
| |                        
| | Richard J. Townsend    
| | Chief Financial Officer

November 9, 2004
Section 7 

Evidence that Tribe Followed its own Procedures for 

Approval of AQMP 

See Attachments : 

+ GRIC Ordinance GR-03-02 (Ordinance on 

Ordinance Approval Process) 

+ AQMP Pre-Adoption Notice 

+ GRIC Pre-Adoption Publication in Gila 

River Indian News (GRIN) 

+ GRIC Pre-Adoption Notice of Public 

Hearings 

+ GRIC Post Adoption Notice -District 

Postings
# Official Journal C 150A/28 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 150A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6428 April 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 150A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6428 April 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Economic and Social Committee |
| 2021/C 150 A/01 | Vacancy notice No 25/2021 for the post of director (M/F) in Directorate D — Communication and Interinstitutional Relations (Publication under Article 29(1) and (2) of the Staff Regulations) | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Economic and Social Committee

2021/C 150 A/01

Vacancy notice No 25/2021 for the post of director (M/F) in Directorate D — Communication and Interinstitutional Relations (Publication under Article 29(1) and (2) of the Staff Regulations)

(Publication under Article 29(1) and (2) of the Staff Regulations)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN