alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  August      23, 2010 | By:    | /s/     David      Bruce Hong |
|---------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  |   | David      Bruce Hong                                  |
|                                  |   | Chief      Accounting Officer                          |
|                                  |   | (Principal      Financial and AccountingOfficer)       |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          13,172
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,369
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,429
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,974
<PP&E>                                         186,028
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,310
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 207,093
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,709
<BONDS>                                          3,553
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           132
<OTHER-SE>                                     143,759
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   207,093
<SALES>                                          5,375
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,375
<CGS>                                            3,176
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,981
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (125)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,481)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (970)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,511)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,511)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)
        

</TABLE>
H. Con. Res. 167 Agreed to October 29, 1997

One Hundred Fifth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-seven

Concurrent Resolution

To correct a technical error in the enrollment of H.R. 2160.

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That in the enrollment of H.R. 2160 the Clerk of the House

shall, in title IV, in the item relating to ‘‘DOMESTIC FOOD PROGRAMS—FOOD STAMP PROGRAM’’, strike the period and insert the

following: ‘‘: Provided further, That none of the funds made available

under this heading shall be used for studies and evaluations.’’.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
#### Seaun Llwellyn FARTHING, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James V. BEALE, Warden of St. Brides Correctional Center, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-6926

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 31, 2018

Decided: February 23, 2018

*296Seaun Llwellyn Farthing, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher P. Schandevel, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Ap-, pellee.

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Seaun Llewellyn Farthing seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief .on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003), When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Farthing has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
EX-34 (c)
(logo) PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
300 Madison Avenue
New York NY 10017
Telephone (646) 471-3000
www.pwc.com


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors of Residential Capital, LLC:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Assertion Concerning Compliance with Regulation AB Item 1122
Servicing Criteria, that GMAC Mortgage, LLC (the "Company"), a subsidiary
of Residential Capital, LLC, complied with the servicing criteria set forth in
Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the
GMACM Private Platform (the "Platform") as of and for the year then ended
December 31, 2006, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii); 1122(d)(2)(iv);
1122(d)(3)(i),(ii) and 1122(d)(4)(i),(ii), which the Company has determined are
not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the
Platform. Appendix A to management's assertion identifies the individual asset-
backed transactions and securities defined by management as constituting the
Platform.  Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected
asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of
selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether
the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected
activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures
were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by
the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not
designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred
prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or
amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this
report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's
compliance with the servicing criteria.


In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2006, for the GMACM Private Platform is fairly stated, in all
material respects.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New York, New York
March 6, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 54 (Monday, March 21, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 15984]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05888]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP22-700-000.
    Applicants: Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Updates to GT&C Sections 13 & 
24 to be effective 4/14/2022.
    Filed Date: 3/14/22.
    Accession Number: 20220314-5149.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 3/28/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-701-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: 2022 Annual Penalty Revenue 
Crediting Report to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 3/15/22.
    Accession Number: 20220315-5025.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 3/28/22.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: March 15, 2022.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-05888 Filed 3-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 808 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 808

    To authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor to James 
    Megellas, formerly of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, and currently of 
 Colleyville, Texas, for acts of valor on January 28, 1945, during the 
                  Battle of the Bulge in World War II.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2015

 Mr. Grothman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor to James 
    Megellas, formerly of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, and currently of 
 Colleyville, Texas, for acts of valor on January 28, 1945, during the 
                  Battle of the Bulge in World War II.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF THE MEDAL OF HONOR TO JAMES 
              MEGELLAS FOR ACTS OF VALOR DURING BATTLE OF THE BULGE.

    (a) Waiver of Time Limitations.--Notwithstanding the time 
limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10, United States Code, 
or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain 
medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, the President may 
award the Medal of Honor under section 3741 of such title to James 
Megellas, formerly of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, and currently of 
Colleyville, Texas, for the acts of valor during World War II described 
in subsection (b).
    (b) Acts of Valor Described.--The acts of valor referred to in 
subsection (a) are the actions of James Megellas on January 28, 1945, 
in Herresbach, Belgium, during the Battle of the Bulge when, as a first 
lieutenant in the 82d Airborne Division, he led a surprise and 
devastating attack on a much larger advancing enemy force, killing and 
capturing a large number and causing others to flee, single-handedly 
destroying an attacking German Mark V tank with two hand-held grenades, 
and then leading his men in clearing and seizing Herresbach.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 236 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

  2d Session
S. RES. 236

            Appointing Members to certain Senate committees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 29, 1996

    Mr. Dole (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
            Appointing Members to certain Senate committees.

    Resolved, That, notwithstanding the provisions of the Standing 
Rules of the Senate, the following Members are hereby appointed to the 
following Senate committees:
    Committee on Environment and Public Works: Mr. Bennett and Mr. 
Wyden.
    Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation: Mr. Abraham and 
Mr. Wyden.
    Committee on the Budget: Mr. Grams and Mr. Wyden.
    Special Committee on Aging: Mr. Warner and Mr. Wyden.
                                 <all>
```
**Important legal notice**

*|*

# 12006M036

**Treaty on European Union (consolidated version) - Title VI - Provisions on police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Article 36***Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0028 - 0028 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0025 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0166 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 191 , 29/07/1992 P. 0062*

Article 36

1. A Coordinating Committee shall be set up consisting of senior officials. In addition to its coordinating role, it shall be the task of the Committee to:

- give opinions for the attention of the Council, either at the Council's request or on its own initiative,

- contribute, without prejudice to Article 207 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, to the preparation of the Council's discussions in the areas referred to in Article 29.

2. The Commission shall be fully associated with the work in the areas referred to in this title.

--------------------------------------------------
# L_2008265EN.01S00301.xml

| 4.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 265/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 265/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 113 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 113

Expressing the sense of Congress about the Food and Drug Administration 
 proposal to designate the use of chlorofluorocarbons in metered-dose 
                       inhalers as nonessential.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 1997

  Mr. Stearns (for himself, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, and Mr. Hastert) 
 submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to 
                       the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of Congress about the Food and Drug Administration 
 proposal to designate the use of chlorofluorocarbons in metered-dose 
                       inhalers as nonessential.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that proposed regulation of the 
Food and Drug Administration (62 Fed. Reg. 10242) to designate the use 
of chlorofluorocarbons (CFC) in metered-dose inhalers (MDI) as 
nonessential so as to make MDIs which use CFC an adulterated device 
puts at risk the health of millions of asthma patients--especially 
children and the elderly--and does not contribute measurably to 
protection of the environment. Therefore, the Food and Drug 
Administration should withdraw its proposal and focus its efforts on 
implementing existing Montreal Protocol decisions that will facilitate 
a transition to CFC-free MDIs by the year 2005.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered January 4, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00118-CR

ANTONIO LAMAR COCHRAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F15-76529-H

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s December 31, 2018 second motion for extension of time 

to file his brief or in the alternative, a motion to suspend the due date until the reporter’s record is 

complete. In the motion, appellant notes that not all the days of voir dire were included in the 

record and volumes 11 and 12 are identical in content. 

Our review of this appeal shows the thirty-eight volume reporter’s record was filed on 

November 1, 2018; volumes 31-38 are sealed. Volumes 11 and 12 are substantially identical, 

containing the August 30, 2017 voir dire. On December 31, 2018, court reporter Crystal Jones 

filed a supplemental reporter’s record with voir dire from September 6, 2017, along with a letter 

stating that the supplemental record represents what should have been uploaded as volume 12 

when the reporter’s record was filed November 1, 2018.
It appears the reporter’s record is now complete. We GRANT appellant’s motion to the 

extent it requests an extension of time. Appellant’s brief is DUE January 31, 2019.

We STRIKE volume 12 of the reporter’s record filed November 1, 2018.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Joseph Louis HENNING, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-41187 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 5, 2017

Paul Anderson Hable, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s. Office, Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Joseph Louis Henning, Pro Se

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Joseph Louis Henning has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a supplemental brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hen-ning has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cíe. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published'and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Dorthey Virginia GETER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 15-35706

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 21, 2017 * San Francisco, California

Filed December 26, 2017

Richard Allen Sly, Esquire, Attorney, Richard A Sly Attorney-At-Law, Portland, OR, Tim Wilborn, Attorney, Wilbom Law Office, P.C., Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellant

*394Daphne Banay, SSA — Social Security Administration, Office of the General Counsel, Seattle, WA, Renata Gowie, DOJ-USAO, Portland, OR, for Defendant-Ap-pellee

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and TROTT and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument, *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Dorthey Geter appeals the district court’s order affirming the Social Security Administration’s denial of her applications for disability benefits. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for substantial evidence, *Molina v. Astrue,*674 F.3d 1104, 1110-11 (9th Cir. 2012), and we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

The ALJ’s reasons for finding that the lay testimony of Rhonda Geter, Geter’s sister had only “limited value” are not supported by substantial evidence. The sister’s statements indicated that she had personally observed Geter’s behavior during visits and phone calls. The sister’s statements regarding Geter’s mental impairments were consistent with the mental health records as a whole, including Dr. Vanderpool’s observation of hypomania and tentative diagnosis of either bipolar type II or cyclothymia. Furthermore, the sister’s statements to the effect that Geter is severely mentally ill are corroborated by Geter’s undisputed episodes of homelessness and living on the streets. This error is not harmless, because the- sister’s statements evinced a more limited ability to function mentally than that adopted by the ALJ in the RFC and posed to the vocational expert. Although we find no merit in the other claims, we remand for reconsideration in light of the sister’s evidence.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.