alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE         

No 119/2005

of 30 September 2005         

amending Annex IX (Financial services) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Annex IX to the Agreement shall be amended as follows:

Article 2

The text of Directive 2005/1/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 October 2005, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 September 2005.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

HSH Prinz Nikolaus von LIECHTENSTEIN            

----

(1)OJ L 306, 24.11.2005, p. 45.

(2)OJ L 79, 24.3.2005, p. 9.

(*1)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

----
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Pan Asian Corporation (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, the undersigned officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  February 15, 2010

/s/    Joseph R. Rozelle



JOSEPH R. ROZELLE

Principal Executive Officer

and Principal Financial Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PowerHouse Technologies Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gregory A. Duffell, Secretary, Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Gregory A. Duffell
------------------------
Gregory A. Duffell
Secretary, Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Date: February 27, 2004


<PAGE>



                 SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.



POWERHOUSE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.

By: /s/  Jay Elliot
    --------------------
    President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: February 27, 2004
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration

# AGENCY:

United States Section, NAFTA Secretariat, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice of completion of panel review.

# SUMMARY:

                        In accordance with Rules 78 and 80 of the NAFTA                         *Rules of Procedure for Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews,*                         the Large Residential Washers from Mexico (Secretariat File Number: USA-MEX-2019-1904-04) Panel Review was completed and the panelists were discharged from their duties effective March 21, 2022.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Vidya Desai, Acting United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Room 2061, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, 202-482-5438.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Chapter 19 of Article 1904 of NAFTA provides a dispute settlement mechanism involving trade remedy determinations issued by the Government of the United States, the Government of Canada, and the Government of Mexico. Following a Request for Panel Review, a Binational Panel is composed to review the trade remedy determination being challenged and issue a binding Panel Decision. For the complete NAFTA                     *Rules of Procedure for Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews,*                     please see                     *https://can-mex-usa-sec.org/​secretariat/​agreement-accord-acuerdo/​nafta-alena-tlcan/​rules-regles-reglas/​index.aspx?​lang=​eng.*

Dated: March 21, 2022.

Vidya Desai,

Acting U.S. Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.

[FR Doc. 2022-06283 Filed 3-23-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-GT-P
#### Keith CAMPBELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-2197

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 18, 2018

Decided: January 22, 2018

Keith Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Mar-yan Alexander, Brigitte Joelle Smith, WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDEL-MAN & DICKER LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Keith Campbell appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying his motion to withdraw the stipulation of dismissal of his negligence action.* After the parties reached a settlement agreement, Campbell unsuccessfully moved to reopen the case, asserting that he had felt undue pressure to settle. For the first time on appeal, Campbell challenges the propriety of comments made by a different magistrate judge during a settlement conference. This claim is unpreserved and, in any event, lacks evidentiary support. Because Campbell proffers no viable challenge to the enforceability of the settlement agreement, we affirm the magistrate judge’s order. *See Campbell v. J.C. Penney Corp.,*No. 8:16-cv-03820-WGC (D. Md. Sept. 18, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*

*

 The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (2012) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73.
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 27

A resolution amending Rule XXV.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 5, 1995

Mr. DOLE submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

A resolution amending Rule XXV.

1 Resolved, That at the end of Rule XXV, add the fol2 lowing:

3 A Senator who on the date this subdivision is agreed

4 to is serving on the Committee on Armed Services, and

5 the Committee on Environment and Public Works, may,

6 during the One Hundred Fourth Congress, also serve as

7 a member of the Committee on Governmental Affairs, but

8 in no event may such Senator serve, by reason of this sub9 division, as a member of more than three committees list10 ed in paragraph 2.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

## Filings Instituting Proceedings

*Docket Numbers:*                     RP22-707-000.                

*Applicants:*                     KPC Pipeline, LLC.                

*Description:*                     § 4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Filing to be effective 4/1/2022.                

*Filed Date:*                     3/18/22.                

*Accession Number:*                     20220318-5033.                

*Comment Date:*                     5 p.m. ET 3/30/22.                

Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.

                    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system (                    *https://elibrary.ferc.gov/​idmws/​search/​fercgensearch.asp*) by querying the docket number.                

                    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying facilities filings can be found at:                     *http://www.ferc.gov/​docs-filing/​efiling/​filing-req.pdf.*                     For other information, call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                

Dated: March 18, 2022.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-06237 Filed 3-23-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME OF THE COMPANY
AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           5,769
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  116,815
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,732
<INVENTORY>                                     43,850
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               203,266
<PP&E>                                         117,536
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,592
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 705,933
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,857
<BONDS>                                        201,946
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           224
<OTHER-SE>                                     421,412
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   705,933
<SALES>                                        265,439
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               265,439
<CGS>                                          167,710
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  167,710
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,648
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,653
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,250
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,403
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,403
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.60
        

</TABLE>
No. 11-9800.

No. 11-10616.

#### Wilson *v.*Texas. Bear Cloud *v.*Wyoming.

Ct. App. Tex., 14th Dist. Reported below: 348 S. W. 3d 32; and

Sup. Ct. Wyo. Reported below: 2012 WY 16, 275 R 3d 377. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases remanded for further consideration in light of *Miller*v. *Alabama,*567 U. S. 460 (2012).
#### Enrique DIAZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M. PEREZ; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-15713

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 26, 2017*

Filed July 3, 2017

Enrique Diaz, Pro Se

*555Ian Michael Ellis, .Attorney, AGCA— Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appel-lees , >

Before: PAEZ, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Enrique Diaz appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging due process violations in connection with his disciplinary hearings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Toguchi v. Chung,*391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Diaz’s due process claim for the loss of good time credits because Diaz’s good-time credits were restored through the appeals process. *See Frank v. Schultz,*808 F.3d 762, 764 (9th Cir. 2015) (no due process claim where any procedural error was corrected through the administrative appeal process).

However, Diaz alleged in his verified complaint that he was subjected to a 60-day term of segregation that materially differed from general population. The district court did not evaluate Diaz’s due process claim based on these allegations, and the record is insufficiently developed as to whether Diaz’s term of segregation “impose[d an] atypical and significant hardship on [Diaz] in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life.” *Sandin v. Conner,*515 U.S. 472, 484, 115 S.Ct. 2293, 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995); *Jackson v. Carey,*353 F.3d 750, 755-57 (9th Cir. 2003) (explaining that the *Sandin*test requires a case-by-case consideration and reversing the district court’s dismissal of the prisoner’s due process claim). Accordingly, we vacate the judgment in part, and remand for the district court to evaluate in the first instance whether Diaz’s term of segregation implicated a liberty interest under *Sandin.*

The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.

AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
### Section 7

Evidence that Tribe Followed its own Procedures for Approval ofAQMP See Attachments : 

# + GRIC Ordinance GR-03-02 (Ordinance on Ordinance Approval Process) 

# + AQMP Pre-Adoption Notice 

## + GRIC Pre-Adoption Publication in Gila River Indian News (GRIN) 

# + GRIC Pre-AdoptionNotice ofPublic Hearings 

# + GRIC Post Adoption Notice -District Postings
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 23, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 16555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06115]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer 
Communications Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Taxpayer 
Communications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. Due to 
unavoidable delays in this year's approval process, we will not be able 
to meet the 15-calendar notice threshold, but this meeting will still 
be open. This meeting will still be held via teleconference.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, March 30, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Conchata Holloway at 1-888-912-1227 or 
336-690-6217.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Communications 
Project Committee will be held Wednesday, March 30, 2022, at 2:00 p.m. 
Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure 
of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with 
Conchata Holloway. For more information please contact Conchata 
Holloway at 1-888-912-1227 or 214-413-6550, or write TAP Office, 1114 
Commerce Street, Mail Code 1005DAL, Dallas, Texas, 75242 or contact us 
at the website: http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda will include 
various IRS issues.

    Dated: March 17, 2022.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2022-06115 Filed 3-22-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 214

Recognizing the contributions of the cities of Bristol, Tennessee, and Bristol,

Virginia, and their people to the origins and development of Country

Music, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 11, 1998

Mr. JENKINS (for himself and Mr. BOUCHER) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and

the Workforce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the contributions of the cities of Bristol, Tennessee, and Bristol, Virginia, and their people to the

origins and development of Country Music, and for other

purposes.

Whereas the cities of Bristol, Tennessee, and Bristol, Virginia, have long been a gathering place for musicians

from the nearby mountainous countryside;

Whereas phonographic recordings made in Bristol in August

of 1927 launched the careers of the Carter Family and

Jimmie Rodgers, who are recognized as the first commercially successful modern Country Music artists;
2

•HCON 214 IH

Whereas these recordings have been called the ‘‘Big Bang of

Country Music’’ by the Country Music Foundation in its

publication ‘‘Country, the Music and the Musicians’’;

Whereas Jimmie Rodgers has been named the Father of

Country Music and was the first artist to be inducted

into the Country Music Hall of Fame;

Whereas the original members of the Carter Family have

been recognized as Country Music’s First Family in part

because their works have had an unparalleled influence

on succeeding generations of Country Music artists;

Whereas ‘‘The Roots of Country Music’’, a three-part television series which aired nationally on the Turner Broadcasting System in June of 1996, recognized the significant contribution of the cities of Bristol to the development and commercial acceptance of Country Music;

Whereas in 1984 the Tennessee Senate recognized Bristol as

the ‘‘Birthplace of Country Music’’; and

Whereas in 1995, the Virginia General Assembly recognized

Bristol as the ‘‘Birthplace of Country Music’’: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) recognizes the critical contributions of the

4 cities of Bristol, Tennessee, and Bristol, Virginia,

5 and their residents to the origins and development of

6 Country Music;

7 (2) congratulates the cities of Bristol, Ten8 nessee, and Bristol, Virginia, for launching with the
3

•HCON 214 IH

1 Bristol recordings of 1927 the careers of the Na2 tion’s first widely known Country Music artists; and

3 (3) acknowledges and commends the cities of

4 Bristol, Tennessee, and Bristol, Virginia, as the

5 birthplace of Country Music, a style of music which

6 has enjoyed broad commercial success in the United

7 States and throughout much of the world.

Æ
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Loral
Space & Communications Ltd. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the three months ending March 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Richard J.
Townsend, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the
    requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ RICHARD J. TOWNSEND
| |                        
| | Richard J. Townsend    
| | Chief Financial Officer

May 10, 2004