alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-4.2



 Exhibit 4.2 

AMENDMENT TO THE 

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. 

2009 STOCK PLAN 

November 17, 2017 
 This
Amendment (this “Amendment”) to Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. 2009 Stock Plan, as amended (the “Plan”) is effective as of the date first set forth above, such amendment being approved by the Board of
Directors of Broadcom Limited (the “Company”) pursuant to Section 22(a) of the Plan. The Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
  

	 	1.	The following will replace Section 2(k) of the Plan in its entirety: 

  

	 	    	“2(k)    ‘Company’ means Broadcom Limited (Registration No. 201505572G), a limited company incorporated under the Republic of Singapore.” 


 

	 	2.	All references to “ordinary shares,” “shares,” “stock,” “common stock,” “shares of common stock” or other similar terms in the Plan shall refer to the ordinary shares of
the Company. 

  

	 	3.	Except as provided in this Amendment, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 


*    *    *    *    *
Exhibit 4.2

 

	
Number
   B-
    	
 
    	
Incorporated Under the Laws of the State of Alaska
    	
 
    	
Shares
   -0-
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Cusip No.
    


 

GCI LIBERTY, INC.

 

Class B-1 Common Stock, no par value

 

Specimen Certificate

 

This Certifies that [          ]  is the owner of [          ] FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF CLASS B-1 COMMON STOCK, NO PAR VALUE, OF GCI LIBERTY, INC. (hereinafter called the “Corporation”) transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of the Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.

 

Witness, the seal of the Corporation and the signatures of its duly authorized officers.

 

Dated:

 

GCI Liberty, Inc.

 

[Corporate Seal]

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
President
    	
 
    	
Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,758
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,769
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (275)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,809
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,061
<PP&E>                                         650,373
<DEPRECIATION>                               (345,519)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 329,915
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,950
<BONDS>                                        119,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           203
<OTHER-SE>                                     163,414
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   329,915
<SALES>                                         98,524
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                99,570
<CGS>                                           45,572
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,612
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   269
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,131
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,558
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,312
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,246
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,246
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.43


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 134 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 134

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol to allow Members of 
 Congress to greet and receive His All Holiness Patriarch Bartholomew.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 134

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used on October 21, 
1997, from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon, for a ceremony to allow Members of 
Congress to greet and receive His All Holiness Patriarch Bartholomew, 
the 270th Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople. Physical preparations 
for the conduct of the ceremony shall be carried out in accordance with 
such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 16, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 230

Honoring the Berlin Airlift.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 26, 1998

Mr. HEFLEY submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Honoring the Berlin Airlift.

Whereas the date, 26 June 1998, marks the 50th anniversary

of the commencement of the Allied effort to supply the

people of Berlin, Germany, with food, fuel, and supplies

in the face of the illegal Soviet blockade that divided the

city;

Whereas this 15 month Allied effort became known throughout the free world as the ‘‘Berlin Airlift’’ and ultimately

cost the lives of 78 Allied airmen, of whom 31 were

United States fliers;

Whereas this heroic humanitarian undertaking was universally regarded as an unambiguous statement of Western

resolve to thwart further Soviet expansion;

Whereas the Berlin Airlift was an unqualified success, both

as an instrument of diplomacy and as a life saving rescue
2

•HCON 230 IH

of the 1,000,000 inhabitants of West Berlin, with

2,326,205 tons of supplies delivered by 277,728 flights

over a 462-day period;

Whereas historians and citizens the world over view the success of this courageous action as pivotal to the ultimate

defeat of international tyranny, symbolized today by the

fall of the Berlin Wall; and

Whereas this inspiring act of resolve must be preserved in the

memory of future generations in a positive and dramatic

manner: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 50th anniversary of the Berlin Airlift should include the

4 presentation of a suitable gift of representational art from

5 the citizens of the United States of America to the citizens

6 of the Federal Republic of Germany, commemorating the

7 fall of the ‘‘Berlin Wall’’ and the reunification of this great

8 city and, to this end, civic and corporate leaders across

9 the Nation are entrusted to fulfill this intent using private

10 subscription and volunteer effort with the encouragement

11 and support of the United States Congress.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 23, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 16556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06112]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and 
Publications Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and 
Publications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. Due to 
unavoidable delays in this year's approval process, we will not be able 
to meet the 15-calendar notice threshold, but this meeting will still 
be open. This meeting will still be held via teleconference.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, March 31, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Smith at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 
317-3087.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and 
Publications Project Committee will be held Thursday, March 31, 2022, 
at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments 
or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and 
structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be 
made with Fred Smith. For more information, please contact Fred Smith 
at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 317-3087, or write TAP Office, 1111 
Constitution Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at 
the website: http://www.improveirs.org.

    Dated: March 17, 2022.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2022-06112 Filed 3-22-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0001006591
<NAME> WHITE PINE SOFTWARE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-03-1997
<CASH>                                      16,018,606
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,071,130
<ALLOWANCES>                                   113,258
<INVENTORY>                                     87,339
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,903,747
<PP&E>                                       3,505,966
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,203,352
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,977,865
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,083,958
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        92,342
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,977,865
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,097,254
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,363,475
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,174,002
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                45,419
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,029
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,697,517)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,761
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,704,278)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.63)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         306,815
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,108,214
<ALLOWANCES>                                    75,812
<INVENTORY>                                  6,212,923
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,359,997
<PP&E>                                       2,843,233
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,262,923
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,184,689
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,485,814
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,843,419
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,184,689
<SALES>                                     17,924,622
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,924,622
<CGS>                                       14,272,545
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,272,545
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (84,097)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                802,063
<INCOME-TAX>                                   121,690
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            923,753
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   923,753
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.3
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

SAMUEL TANNER, § § No. 236, 2014 Respondent Below- § Appellant, § Court Below: Family Court § of the State of Delaware in and v. § for New Castle County § THERESA ALLEN, § File No. 13-23165 § Petitioner Below- § Appellee. §

Submitted: January 21, 2015 Decided: January 26, 2015

Before STRINE , Chief Justice, HOLLAND , and RIDGELY , Justices.

O R D E R

On this 26 th day of January 2015, after careful consideration o f the parties’

briefs, we find that the Family Court’s judgment sh ould be affirmed on the basis of

its well-reasoned Order, dated April 28, 2014.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Family

Court is AFFIRMED

.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Henry duPont Ridgely
Justice
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymon Rashaun BLACK, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-12413 Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(December 6, 2017)

Steven E. Butler, Adam W. Overstreet, U.S. Attorney Service—Southern District of Alabama, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Mobile, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Before MARCUS, ROSENBAUM and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

William Gregory Hughes, appointed counsel for Raymon Rashaun Black in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Black’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sherita NICKS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-7036

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 19, 2017

Decided: December 22, 2017

Sherita Nicks, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Curtis Bosse, Joseph Evan DePadil-la, Assistant United States Attorneys, John Farrell Butler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

*144Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sherita Nicks seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Nicks has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6400 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 8, 2016 

Received 

AN ACT 

To revise the boundaries of certain John H. Chafee Coastal 

Barrier Resources System units in New Jersey. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 6400 RDS

1 SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL 

2 BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM MAP. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The map subtitled ‘‘Seidler Beach 

4 Unit NJ–02, Cliffwood Beach Unit NJ–03P, Conaskonk 

5 Point Unit NJ–04’’, dated August 1, 2014, that is in6 cluded in the set of maps entitled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Re7 sources System’’ referred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal 

8 Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)) and relating 

9 to certain John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources Sys10 tem units in New Jersey, is hereby replaced by another 

11 map subtitled ‘‘Seidler Beach Unit NJ–02/NJ–02P, 

12 Cliffwood Beach Unit NJ–03P, Conaskonk Point Unit 

13 NJ–04, Sayreville Unit NJ–15P, Matawan Point Unit 

14 NJ–16P’’ and dated October 7, 2016. 

15 (b) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior 

16 shall keep the replacement map referred to in subsection 

17 (a) on file and available for inspection in accordance with 

18 section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 

19 U.S.C. 3503(b)). 

Passed the House of Representatives December 7, 

2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

OPEN MRI OF DAYTONA a/a/o TONY ROBINSON
, Appellant,

v.

DIRECT GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 2 1

- 1148

[ March 24, 2022 ]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,
Broward County ; Natasha DePrimo , Judge; L.T. Case No. COWE19

- 015594

.

Christina M. Kalin and John C

. Daly of Daly & Barber, P.A.

, Plantation, for appellant

.

William J. McFarlane, III, and Michael K. Mittelmark of McFarlane Dolan & Prince, Coral Springs , for appellee

.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

D AMOORGIAN
, F ORST and A RTAU
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 34.2



LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.:

We have examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that
Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association (Midland or the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for
all transactions serviced on the Enterprise! Loan Management System (the Platform), as of December 31, 2015 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C),
1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the
Companys compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected
activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to
detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that Midland complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2015 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.



|                 
|-----------------
|LOGO             
|                 
|February 25, 2016



LOGO