alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 649 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 649

   To authorize borrowers of loans under the William D. Ford Federal 
  Direct Loan Program to modify the interest rate of such loans to be 
 equal to the interest rate for such loans at the time of modification.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2015

Mr. Pocan (for himself, Mr. Lowenthal, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Cartwright, 
    Mr. Schrader, Ms. Wilson of Florida, Ms. Chu of California, Mr. 
     Ellison, Mr. Kind, Mr. Cohen, and Ms. Brownley of California) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                      Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize borrowers of loans under the William D. Ford Federal 
  Direct Loan Program to modify the interest rate of such loans to be 
 equal to the interest rate for such loans at the time of modification.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Student Loan Refinancing Act''.

SEC. 2. BORROWER MODIFICATION OF INTEREST RATES UNDER THE WILLIAM D. 
              FORD FEDERAL DIRECT LOAN PROGRAM.

    Section 455(b) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1087e(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(11) Borrower modification of interest rate.--
                    ``(A) Modification.--Notwithstanding the preceding 
                paragraphs of this subsection, the borrower of a 
                Federal Direct Stafford Loan, a Federal Direct 
                Unsubsidized Stafford Loan, a Federal Direct PLUS Loan, 
                or a Federal Direct Consolidation Loan may elect to 
                modify the interest rate of the loan to be equal to the 
                interest rate that would be applicable to such loan if 
                such loan were first disbursed (or in the case of a 
                Federal Direct Consolidation Loan, first applied for) 
                on the date on which such borrower elects to modify the 
                interest rate of such loan.
                    ``(B) Fixed rate.--Except as provided in 
                subparagraph (C), an interest rate elected under 
                subparagraph (A) for a loan shall be fixed for the life 
                of the loan.
                    ``(C) Continuing authority to modify.--A borrower 
                may elect to modify the interest rate of a loan in 
                accordance with subparagraph (A) at any time during the 
                life of the loan.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 35.4



|     |                      |                              
|---- | -------------------- | -----------------------------
|LOGO |                      | Commercial Mortgage Servicing
|     | D1050-084, 8th Floor
|     | 401 South Tryon St. 
|     | Charlotte, NC 28202 
|     | 1-800-326-1334      

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014, by and among WELLS FARGO
COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as General Special Servicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Master Servicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Special Servicer,
PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C22 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify
that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the General Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during
such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of
February 2017.



|                        
|------------------------
|LOGO                    
|Daniel Bober            
|Executive Vice President
|Wells Fargo Bank        



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
EXHIBIT 99.1
CERTIFICATION  OF  CHIEF  EXECUTIVE  OFFICER

                                VILLAGEWORLD.COM
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  VillageWorld.Com,  (the "Small
Business  Issuer")  on  Amendment  #2 to Form 10-QSB for the three-month and six
month  period  ended  June  30,  2003  as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Peter  J. Keenan, Chief
Executive  Officer  of  VillageWorld.Com,  certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

     1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
15  (d)  of  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2)     The  information  contained  in  the  Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Small  Business  Issuer.

/s/  Peter  J.  Keenan
----------------------
Peter  J.  Keenan
Chief  Executive  Officer
February  12,  2004
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D 24

- 0065 LT Case No. 2018

- CF

- 13393

- A

_____________________________ G AMBA K ENTE R AY , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County

. Laura E. Ward , Judge

. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Clark E. Green, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow , for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellee.

March 12, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L AMBERT , J AY , and B OATWRIGHT , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 4, 2012

y0328 

# Order

April 4, 2012

143992

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143992 COA: 305949 GERALD PRINCE, Wayne CC: 06-011010-FH Defendant-Appellant.

___________________ _________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 10, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**** 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**** AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**** SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

            In connection with the Annual Report of Aquamer Medical Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marshall Sterman, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: April 13, 2008

| /s/ Marshall Sterman                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| Marshall Sterman, President and          Chief Executive Officer          (Principal Executive Officer) and          Acting Chief Financial Officer          (Principal Financial Officer and          Principal Accounting Officer) |
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 258

To designate the balcony adjacent to rooms S–230 and S–231 of the United

States Capitol Building as the ‘‘Robert J. Dole Balcony’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 11, 1996

Mr. NICKLES (for himself, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. LOTT, Mr. FORD, Mr. THURMOND, Mrs. KASSEBAUM, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. ASHCROFT,

Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. BENNETT, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. BOND,

Mrs. BOXER, Mr. BRADLEY, Mr. BREAUX, Mr. BROWN, Mr. BRYAN, Mr.

BUMPERS, Mr. BURNS, Mr. BYRD, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. CHAFEE, Mr.

COATS, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. COHEN, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. COVERDELL, Mr.

CRAIG, Mr. D’AMATO, Mr. DEWINE, Mr. DODD, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr.

DORGAN, Mr. EXON, Mr. FAIRCLOTH, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mrs. FEINSTEIN,

Mr. FRIST, Mr. GLENN, Mr. GORTON, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. GRAMM, Mr.

GRAMS, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. GREGG, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. HATCH, Mr. HATFIELD, Mr. HEFLIN, Mr. HELMS, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr.

INHOFE, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. JOHNSTON, Mr.

KEMPTHORNE, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. KERREY, Mr. KERRY, Mr. KOHL, Mr.

KYL, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr.

LUGAR, Mr. MACK, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. MCCONNELL, Ms. MIKULSKI, Ms.

MOSELEY-BRAUN, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr.

NUNN, Mr. PELL, Mr. PRESSLER, Mr. PRYOR, Mr. REID, Mr. ROBB, Mr.

ROCKEFELLER, Mr. ROTH, Mr. SANTORUM, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. SIMON, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. SMITH, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. SPECTER,

Mr. STEVENS, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. THOMPSON, Mr. WARNER, Mr.

WELLSTONE, and Mr. WYDEN) submitted the following resolution; which

was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To designate the balcony adjacent to rooms S–230 and S–

231 of the United States Capitol Building as the ‘‘Robert

J. Dole Balcony’’.
2

SRES 258 ATS

1 Resolved, That the balcony adjacent to rooms S–230

2 and S–231 of the United States Capitol Building is hereby

3 designated as, and shall hereafter be known as, the ‘‘Rob4 ert J. Dole Balcony’’.

Æ
#### Felix Alvarado FLORES, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 15-70716

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed December 22, 2017

Zulu Ali, Law Office of Zulu Ali, Riverside, CA, for Petitioner

OIL, Aaron R. Petty, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *Sue*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Felix Alvarado Flores, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. *Silaya v. Mukasey,*524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Alvarado Flores was both personally involved in and purposefully assisted persecution on account of political opinion, *see Miranda Alvarado v. Gonzales,*449 F.3d 915, 927 (9th Cir. 2006), .shifting the burden to him to prove that he was not a persecutor, *see*8 C.F.R. § 1240.8(d). Alvarado Flores failed to carry that burden. Thus, substantial evidence supports the agency’s conclusion that Alvarado Flores was ineligible for withholding of removal. *See id.*at 928-29 (persecutor bar applied where petitioner’s actions were *370integral to furthering the persecution of others).

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because Alvarado Flores failed to establish it is more likely than not he would be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the Honduran government. *See Zheng v. Holder,*644 F.3d 829, 835-36 (9th Cir. 2011) (fear of torture speculative).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6057

TERRENCE WAYNE LYTLE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

LAWRENCE PARSONS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III,

Chief District Judge. (5:12-hc-02263-D)

Submitted: April 17, 2014 Decided: April 22, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terrence Wayne Lytle, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, 

III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Terrence Wayne Lytle seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Lytle has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny Lytle’s motion for a certificate of appealability, deny 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# EUR-Lex - 32002D0680 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32002D0680

**2002/680/EC: Commission Decision of 23 August 2002 on a Community financial contribution to expenditure by Spain on establishing the Community vineyard register (notified under document number C(2002) 3133) **

*
Official Journal L 229 , 27/08/2002 P. 0041 - 0042 *

Commission Decision

of 23 August 2002

on a Community financial contribution to expenditure by Spain on establishing the Community vineyard register

(notified under document number C(2002) 3133)

(Only the Spanish text is authentic)

(2002/680/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2392/86 of 24 July 1986 establishing a Community vineyard register(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1631/98(2), and in particular Article 9(3) thereof,

After consulting the EAGGF Committee,

Whereas:

(1) Article 9(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2392/86 states that the Community is to contribute 50 % of the actual cost of establishing the Community vineyard register in the Member States and of the investment in data-processing facilities needed to manage the register.

(2) On the basis of Article 9(3) of that Regulation, advances have been paid to Spain. They are to be deducted from the total amount of the Community contribution.

(3) Under Article 9(4) of that Regulation, Articles 8 and 9 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999(3) apply to the Community contribution to establishing the vineyard register.

(4) Spain has sent the Commission the documents needed to decide on the amount to be defrayed as expenditure incurred in establishing the register.

(5) The Commission has carried out the checks provided for in Article 9(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 729/70(4) and in Article 9(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999.

(6) In the light of the checks carried out, some of the expenditure declared by Spain does not meet the statutory requirements and therefore may not be funded by the Community.

(7) Spain has finalised the vineyard register in its complete version for the provinces not covered on 1 July 1995. However, in accordance with Article 4(4) of Regulation (EEC) No 2392/86, Community funding should be limited to the funding corresponding to that of the simplified register for the areas in question.

(8) A breakdown of the amounts to be defrayed and the amounts to be excluded for failure to comply with Community rules was sent to Spain on 29 April 2002,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Community contribution to the expenditure incurred by Spain in establishing the Community vineyard register shall be as set out in the table annexed to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Spain.

Done at Brussels, 23 August 2002.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 208, 31.7.1986, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 210, 28.7.1998, p. 14.

(3) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 103.

(4) OJ L 94, 28.4.1970, p. 13.

ANNEX

>TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Sterling H. McDonald, Chief Financial Officer of Natural Gas Systems, Inc.,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Natural Gas Systems,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's Board of
Directors:

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date May 16, 2005



                                        /s/ Sterling H. McDonald
                                        ---------------------------
                                        Sterling H. McDonald
                                        Chief Financial Officer