alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 307/2006

of 21 February 2006         

amending Regulation (EC) No 80/2006 opening a standing invitation to tender for the resale on the Community market of rye held by the German intervention agency

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 6 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 80/2006, ‘50 000 tonnes’ is replaced by ‘100 000 tonnes’.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 February 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

(2)OJ L 14, 19.1.2006, p. 5.

----
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-88,133-01

IN RE EVATRUS DERJUAN MOSS, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 685173-A IN THE 228 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus pursuant

to the original jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of

habeas corpus in the 228 District Court of Harris County, that more than 180 days have elapsed th

since an order designating issues was signed, and that the application has not yet been forwarded to

this Court. Relator contends that the district court entered an order designating issues on August 22,

2017.

Respondent, the Judge of the 228 District Court of Harris County, shall file a response with th

this Court by having the District Clerk submit the record on such habeas corpus application. In the
2

alternative, Respondent may resolve the issues set out in the order designating issues and then have

the District Clerk submit the record on such application. In either case, Respondent’s answer shall

be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order. This application for leave to file a writ of

mandamus will be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted his response.

Filed: March 28, 2018

Do not publish
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 296

To permit disabled Senate employees with the privilege of the Senate floor

to use supporting services on the floor.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 24 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 20), 1996

Mr. FORD submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules and Administration

RESOLUTION

To permit disabled Senate employees with the privilege of

the Senate floor to use supporting services on the floor.

1 Resolved, That (a) a Senate employee with a disability

2 (as defined in section 3 of the Americans with Disabilities

3 Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12102)) who has the privilege of

4 the Senate floor under rule XXII of the Standing Rules

5 of the Senate may bring such supporting services (includ6 ing dog guides and interpreters) on the Senate floor as

7 the employing office determines are necessary to assist the

8 disabled employee in discharging the official duties of his

9 or her employment position.
2

•SRES 296 IS

1 (b) The employing office of a disabled employee shall

2 administer the provisions of this resolution.

Æ
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jasmine HARGROVE, a/k/a Jasmine Champion, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-7206

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 30, 2018

Decided: February 2, 2018

Jasmine Hargrove, Appellant Pro Se. .Edward D. Gray, Rudy E. Renfer, Seth Morgan Wood, Assistant United States Attorneys, Tobin Webb Lathan, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appel-lees.

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jasmine Hargrove appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. *See United States v. Muldrow,*844 F.3d 434, 437 (4th Cir. 2016) (reviewing district court’s decision whether to reduce sentence under § 3582(c)(2) for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
6P^^^" " '? ' v h L •*' ^-''-"--^-^ tf" >. ^ /* 

810-110113-009 

.i.^ARTMENTOF ^ 

•\N3PORTATI0N >^W._ ^ ^cc^- ^ ^^'2_^-^f^ 

!AN 13 P 3: u^ORDOV/\ SCHOOL DISTRICT^ 

PO Box 140 * 100 Fisherman Avenue 

Cordova, Alaska 99574-0140 

(907) 424-3265 * FAX (907) 424-32n 

Cordovo Jr/Sr High School Mt. Eeeles Elementary 

(907)424-3266 (907)424-3236 

FAX (907) 424-5215 FAX (907) 424-3117 

The Honorable Ray LaHood January 12,2011 

Secretary 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Secretary LaHood, 

I am writing in support of the renewal of Alaska Airlines essential air service 

agreement that provides daily service to our community of Cordova, Alaslca (docket OST 

1998-4899). 

As with many smaller communities across our state, Alaska Airlines is our lifeline to 

the ''outside" as it is ako the destination for many travelers looking for the dream vacation 

located within our community. From the school district's perspective however, it is much 

more. Alaska Airlines provides a critical service that allows our students to travel to areas 

allowing them to develop vital skills, whether it is through sporting activities or that of taking 

in the varying opportunities for leadership training. Without support and availability of 

Alaska Airlines, professional development for our staff would come to a standstill, as would 

being able to provide critical services for our high needs children requiring specialized help. 

With so many communities struggling to maintain its population, those families in 

transit will often look for a community that provides vital services such as transportation in 

and out of the community. In Cordova, Alaska, this means airline services as there are no 

roads connecting us with the road system. Maintaining the population is the ultimate 

challenge in smaller communities such as ours, as schools, city government, commerce, etc are 

all dependent of such support/access provided by Alaska Air. 

Airfreight delivery of freshly caught (local) salmon benefits all parties, ranging from 

local fishermen and canneries, to vast restaurants located across America. Similar airfreight 

supports delivery of fresh produce/dairy products into our community. 

And finally, Alaska Airlines provides one of the finest services available for travel. 

Inclement weather, winter weather, and darkness issues are all taken in stride with the highly 

trained staff and with the cutting edge technology made available. 

I look forward to continued service of Alaska Airlines... 

Sincerely, 

Superintendent of Schools
March 18, 2010

Mr. Clint Jones or Mr. Phil Ford

Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Aircraft Directorate, ANM-100

1601 Lind Avenue, SW

Renton, WA 98057-3356

SA714NE Single AC Config

PETITION FOR EXEMPTION

The Leading Edge Group, LLC (LEG) as FAA Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) holder of

SA714NE requests FAR compliance relief and submits this Petition for Exemption (P/E) to FAA

rule making established under 14 CFR Sect. 26A7(c) & (e)(2).

LEG petitions the US Govt. for engineering task relief on a Single Configuration of SA714NE for

(1) B737-300 aircraft, SN 24095 with LEG/pats Auxiliary Fuel System (AFS) in HOS

configuration.

1. This SN and LEG/pats STC has been swapped for STC 01552NY-D as replacement.

2. Aircraft continues in HOS service.

3. FAR 26.47 requirements have been met with STC 01552NY~D.

End.

Sincerely,

ASE 'iJ (i3 ,.~,-{ f Proprietary (!) N

§:, . FAA 61 N

S:'l7 i'\-'"C Nota", y lril

M,Jin Of1ice 3425 On/Ion Point Kitk:lanci W.'ishingfol7 98033 Mqin (425) 576-4030
I~Ll-EU(C{CLi,

~it - r "-FJi'

www.airspeed.us.com

March 25, 2010

ASE 100325-15 FRPE

PUBLIC COMMENT

Federal Register Petition for Exemption submittal for public comment:

The Leading Edge Group, LLC (LEG), as FAA Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) holder

of SA714NE requests FAR compliance relief and submits this Petition for Exemption (P/E)

to FAA rule making established under 14 CFR Sect. 26.47(c) & (e)(2).

LEG petitions for US Govt. engineering task relief on a single Configuration of SA714NE

for B737~300series aircraft, with LEG/pats Auxiliary Fuel System (AFS) in VIP passenger

cabin (LOPA) deck plans.

Boeing SN 24095:

1. This SN and LEG/pats STC has been swapped for STC 01552NY-D as

replacement.

2. Aircraft continues flight in dedicated HOS service.

3. FAR §26.47 requirements have been met with STC 01552NY-D.

Thank you.

Karl Seuring, Managing Director

The Leading Edge Group, LLC

Kirkland, WA 98033

COfJJot'lteoffice 3425 Gtni/ofl Polnt J<itk/;m4 Wqshingtol7 98033 M.jff) (425) 576-40:;-0
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA
RE: Docket Number 2023 - CA - 0578 Rise St. James, Louisiana Bucket Brigade, Sierra Club, 

### Centerfor Biological Diversity, HealthyGulf, Earthworks & No Waste Louisiana Versus - - 

### 19th Judicial District Court 

### Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Case #: 694029 East Baton Rouge Parish



### On Application for Rehearing filed on 02/0}/ 2024by Intervenor- BeverlyAlexander Rehearing 

## DENIED

Mitchell R. Theriot 

### Guy Holdridge 4q -#- 

# P 

# 4-

# Z//&// Allison H. Penzato 

# Elizabethfvolfe 

# FEB 15 2024COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA
RE: Docket Number 2023 - CA - 0578 Rise St. James, Louisiana Bucket Brigade, Sierra Club, 

## Centerfor Biological Diversity, HealthyGulf, Earthworks & No Waste Louisiana Versus - - 19th Judicial District Court 

### Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Case #: 694029 East Baton Rouge Parish



## On Application for Rehearing filed on 02/02/2024 by Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Rehearing 

## DENIED

Jeweluke"Welch Jr. Mitchell R. Theriot 

### Guy Holdridge Allison H. Penzato env Elizabeth Wolfe

r1%- 

# FEB 15 2024COURT OFAPPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA
RE: Docket Number 2023 - CA - 0578 Rise St. James, Louisiana Bucket Brigade, Sierra Club, 

### Centerfor Biological Diversity, Healthy Gulf, Earthworks & No Waste Louisiana Versus - - 19th Judicial District Court 

### Louisiana Departmentof Environmental Quality Case #: 694029 East Baton Rouge Parish



### On Application for Rehearing filed on 02/02/2024 by RISE St.James, etal Rehearing DFNiFn

Jewel E. " Duke" Welch Jr. Mitchell R. Theriot 

### Guy Holdridge Allison H. Penzato Elizabeth Wo fe

r, , r 

# FEB 15 2024
(logo)****CURCIO

+COHEN

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

Managing Member

Park Bridge Lender ServicesLLC

New York, NY

 

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’sReport on Assessment of 2016 Compliance by Park Bridge Lender Services LLC withRegulation AB Servicing Criteria (“Management’s Report”),that Park Bridge Lender Services LLC (the “Company”) complied withthe servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities andExchange Commission’s Regulation AB as of and for the year ended December31, 2016, excluding those criteria noted as not applicable (N/A) within ExhibitB to Management’s Report. The transactions covered by this report areonly those transactions processed by the Company in its capacity as trustadvisor or operating advisor for the asset backed securities transactions (the“Platform”) identified in Management’s Report. ReferenceExhibit A to Management’s Report for the transactions covered by thisexamination. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance withthe applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinionon management’s assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of a selectedsample of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whetherthe Company performed those selected activities in compliance with theapplicable servicing criteria during the specified period. Our procedures werelimited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by theCompany during the period covered by this report. Our examination was notdesigned to detect material noncompliance arising from errors that may haveoccurred prior to or subsequent to our tests, that may have affected theCompany’s servicing activities during the period covered by this report.We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’scompliance with the applicable servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicableservicing criteria identified in Exhibit B to Management’s Report withrespect to the transactions identified in Exhibit A to Management’sReport as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, for the Platform, isfairly stated in all material aspects.

 

 

/s/ Curcio & Cohen,CPA’s, P.C.

 

 

New York, NY

February 2, 2017

 

 

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTSPC 7 PENN PLAZA, SUITE 1500 NEW YORK NY 10001

TEL: 212 557-9800  FAX:212 557 9819   WEBSITE: WWW.CWCCPAFIRM.COM
Exhibit 10.36

Via facsimile and courier:  +1-973-335-1974
-------------------------------------------


20 June 2002


Globaltron Communications Corporation
100 N. Biscayne Blvd.
Suite 2500
Miami. FL 33132
United States of America
Attn.  Syed Naqvi

Re:      Settlement of termination liability of leases NSS-1697/98, 1744/45,
         1797/98, 1799/1800

Dear Mr. Naqvi,

Pursuant to our recent discussions regarding the settlement of outstanding
termination liability of your leases numbered NSS-1697/98, NSS-1744/45,
NSS-1797/98 and NSS-1799/1800, we are willing to make the following offer.

New Skies is willing to accept a settlement arrangement with respect to leases
NSS-1697/98, NSS-1744/45, NSS-1797/98 and NSS-1799/1800, according to the
following terms:

1.       New Skies will retain the US$ 46,000 which it presently has on account
         from Globaltron.

2.       Globaltron shall pay to New Skies a cancellation penalty equal to US$
         150,000.00 no later than 30 June 2002.

3.       Commencing 1 December 2002, Globaltron shall pay New Skies US$ 10,000
         per month for a period of 18 months. In the event that Globaltron
         orders new service from New Skies prior to or during such period, New
         Skies shall apply any Globaltron payments which have not yet fallen due
         towards Globaltron's service fees due under the new service agreement.

4.       Except with respect to Globaltron's payment obligations set forth
         above, each party agrees to mutually remise and release the other from
         any and all obligations, claims, losses, liabilities or other damages
         which have arisen or may arise out of the subject leases.

If the above proposal regarding the settlement of termination liability of
leases NSS-1697/98, NSS-1744/45, NSS-1797/98, NSS-1799/1800 is acceptable to
you, please so indicate by signing in the space provided below and returning a
copy of this letter to us by facsimile. We will then consider the liability to
be settled as per the terms contained in this letter. We will follow up with
original copies via courier.

Kind regards,                                    AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:
                                                 GLOBALTRON COMMUNICATIONS
                                                 CORPORATION
Rudo Jockin
Senior VP Sales & Marketing
New Skies Satellites N.V.                       By:__________________________
                                                   Name:
                                                   Date:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 23, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 16495]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06123]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-539 and 731-TA-1280-1282 (Review)]


Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From 
Korea, Mexico, and Turkey

Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that revocation of the countervailing duty order on heavy 
walled rectangular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Turkey and 
the antidumping duty orders on heavy walled rectangular welded carbon 
steel pipes and tubes from Korea, Mexico, and Turkey would be likely to 
lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in 
the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in Sec.  207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on August 2, 2021 (86 FR 
41511) and determined on November 5, 2021 that it would conduct 
expedited reviews (87 FR 7498, February 9, 2022).
    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its 
determinations in these reviews on March 17, 2022. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5297 (March 2022), 
entitled Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes 
from Korea, Mexico, and Turkey: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-539 and 731-
TA-1280-1282 (Review).

    By order of the Commission.
    Issued: March 17, 2022.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-06123 Filed 3-22-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
#### UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Joseph A. HENDERSON Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-2390

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: February 9, 2018

Filed: February 14, 2018

Don Michael Green, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Kansas City, MO, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Joseph A. Henderson, Pro Se

Before LOKEN, KELLY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Henderson directly appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after *370he pled guilty to a firearm offense, pursuant to a plea agreement containing an appeal waiver. Counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), challenging the substantive reasonableness of Henderson’s sentence.

After careful review, we conclude that the appeal waiver is enforceable. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (validity and applicability of appeal waiver is reviewed de novo). The record establishes that Henderson knowingly and voluntarily entered into the plea agreement and the appeal waiver, that the arguments on appeal fall within the scope of the waiver, and that no miscarriage of justice would result from enforcing the waiver. See United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc). In addition, having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no non-frivolous issues for appeal outside the scope of the waiver. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. The appeal is dismissed.

1

. The Honorable Greg Kays, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.
| (logo) WELLS 

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 **ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreementdated as of November 1, 2014, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGESECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asMaster Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, PENTALPHASURVEILLANCE LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asCertificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, andWILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C24 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton,Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.      A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during theperiod from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”),and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made undermy supervision, and

 

2.      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the MasterServicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in allmaterial respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|