alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

PHILIP AUGUST FURINO

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No s . 4D 19

- 1456 and 4D19

- 1462

[ December 17, 2020 ]

Consolidated a ppeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; John S. Kastrenakes , Judge; L.T. Case No.

2018CF003773AXXXMB and 2018CF003772AXXXMB

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Timothy Wang, Assistant Public Defender, West Pa lm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alexandra A. Folley, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN

, G ERBER
, and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 169 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 169

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

            Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 169

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, 
October 9, 1997, it stand adjourned until 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, 
October 21, 1997, or until noon on the second day after Members are 
notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses 
or adjourns at the close of business on Thursday, October 9, 1997, 
Friday, October 10, 1997, or Saturday, October 11, 1997, pursuant to a 
motion made by the Majority Leader, or his designee, in accordance with 
this concurrent resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon 
on Monday, October 20, 1997, or such time on that day as may be 
specified by the Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to 
recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after Members are 
notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, 
in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 8, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
                                   
                                   INVISION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                STATEMENT REGARDING CALCULATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                            (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
                                         (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                    THREE MONTHS ENDED             SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                                         JUNE 30,                      JUNE 30,
                                                                    1997           1996           1997          1996
                                                                    ----           ----           ----          ----
<S>                                                             <C>            <C>             <C>           <C>
Net income (loss)                                                $  1,574       $  (830)        $ 2,216       $(2,045)
                                                                 --------       -------         -------       -------
                                                                 --------       -------         -------       -------

Shares used in per share calculations:
  Common Stock                                                     10,173         5,508           9,676         2,828
  Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options and warrants       1,015           272           1,054           600
  Convertible Preferred Stock                                          --         2,036              --         4,071
                                                                 --------       -------         -------       -------
Shares used in per share calculations                              11,188         7,816          10,730         7,499
                                                                 --------       -------         -------       -------
                                                                 --------       -------         -------       -------

Net income (loss) per share                                      $   0.14    $  $ (0.11)    $  $   0.21    $  $ (0.27)
                                                                 --------       -------         -------       -------
                                                                 --------       -------         -------       -------


</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 467A/15 D

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 467A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5915 December 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 467A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5915 December 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2016/C 467 A/01 | Notice of open competition — EPSO/AST/139/16 — Assistants (AST 3) in the following fields: 1. Finance 2. Human resources | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2016/C 467 A/01

Notice of open competition — EPSO/AST/139/16 — Assistants (AST 3) in the following fields: 1. Finance 2. Human resources

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
steam

_ record - Fw: RRI Ener gy Elrama Power Station Request

-----Forwarded by Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US on 07/02/2010 09:18PM -----

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA From: "Tondo, Rocco" <R Tondo@rrienergy.com> Date: 06/28/2010 11:53AM cc: "Smith, James R. (Ran dy)" <JRSmith@rrienergy.c om>, "Whelan, Kerry M." <KWhelan@rrienergy.com>, "Frank, Stephen" <SFrank@ rrienergy.com>, <DIANE.R.MARTINI@Sargentlundy.com>, "Mac ey, Francis E" <fmacey@rrienergy.com>, "Cunningham, Allison" <ACunningham@rrienergy.com>, "Snyder, Zane K" <ZKSnyder@rrienergy.com>, "Greek, Matt E." <MGreek @rrienergy.com> Subject: RRI Energy Elra ma Power Station Request

Dear Ms. Alicea,

Please see the attached request for a due date extensi on on the Steam Electric Questionnaire from the RRI Energy Elrama power station. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me.

Thank you,

Rocco Tondo

RRI Energy

General Manager Elrama Station

office 330-505-4327

cell 330-301-2788 From: <Alicea.Jezebele @ epamail.epa. g ov> To: <steam_record@erg.c om>, <jordan.ronald@epa.gov> Date: 7/2/2010 8:19 PM Sub j ect: Fw: RRI Energy Elra ma Power Station Request Attachments: US EPA letter.pdf Pa g e 1 of 1

3/17/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C2E49BAD

...
#### Solita HARRINGTON, Creditor-Appellant, v. SATURN CORPORATION, Debtor-Appellee, U.S. Trustee, Greenbelt, 11, Trustee.

No. 17-2183

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 15, 2018

Decided: February 16, 2018

*175Sólita Harrington, Appellant Pro Se. Gary Howard Leibowitz, COLE SGHOTZ, PC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sólita Harrington appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for reconsideration of a prior order dismissing her appeal from a bankruptcy court order granting the debtor’s objection to Harrington’s proof of claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. *Harrington v. Saturn Corp.,*No. 8:17-cv-00656-PX (D. Md. Sept. 25, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
EXHIBIT 35.3
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                           HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC
              RALI SERIES 2006-QH1 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of Homecomings  Financial,  LLC, as
servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable  servicing agreement,  does
hereby certify that:
1. A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during  the  period  covered  by the
Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under the
applicable  servicing  agreement has been made under my  supervision.  2. To the
best of my  knowledge,  based on such review,  the Servicer has fulfilled all of
its  obligations  under  the  applicable  servicing  agreement  in all  material
respects throughout such period.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Managing Director
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6015

JOSEPH A. DANIELS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PAUL E. CALDWELL, Medical Doctor, St. Mary’s Hospital, 

Richmond, Virginia,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior

District Judge. (3:11-cv-00461-REP)

Submitted: April 24, 2014 Decided: April 29, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph A. Daniels, Appellant Pro Se. Kelly Street Brown, 

Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, YOUNG, MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, 

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Joseph A. Daniels appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Daniels’ motions to 

appoint counsel, for a jury trial, and for a physical 

examination, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Daniels v. Caldwell, No. 3:11-cv-00461-REP (E.D. Va. 

Dec. 18, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

BRADLEY SCOTT EDWARDS, ET UX,

KRISTEN EDWARDS,

Appellants,

v.

ROBERT E. EDWARDS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 12

- 00032

- CV

On Appeal from the

367th District Court

of Denton County, Texas

(T.C.# 2010

- 50094

- 367)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee

recover from Appellant and his sureties, if any, see T EX .R.A PP .P. 43.5 , on the judgment and all

costs, both in this Court and the court below, for which let execution issue. This decision shall

be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 11 TH DAY OF DECEMBER , 2013.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

DENNIS JEROME CALLOWAY, ) DOC# 144946, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) Case Nos. 2D17-3096 STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed February 16, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; William H. Burgess, III, Judge. Dennis Jerome Calloway, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, SLEET, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Keith Nicholas OSER, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40176 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 20, 2017

Marisa J. Miller, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Texas, Plano, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Keith Nicholas Oser, Pro Se

Before JONES, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Keith Nicholas Oser has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Oser has filed a response.

The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Oser’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. *See United States v. Isgar,*739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). Nor is the record sufficiently developed for us to address Oser’s contention that his guilty plea was coerced. *See United States v. Corbett,*742 F.2d 173, 176-78 (5th Cir. 1984). We therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. *See Isgar,*739 F.3d at 841; *Corbett,*742 F.2d at 178 n.11.

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Oser’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited' circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
MICHAEL MOBLEY, BY AND 

THROUGH HIS FATHER AND 

NATURAL GUARDIAN, 

DAVID MOBLEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE 

ADMINISTRATION,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-1502

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 7, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Division of Administrative Hearings.

Floyd B. Faglie, Staunton & Faglie, PL, Monticello, for Appellant.

Alexander R. Boler, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Giraldo v. Agency for Health Care Administration, 41 Fla. 

L. Weekly D2743 (Fla. 1st DCA Dec. 12, 2016).

ROWE, RAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 288

Regarding the United States response to Iraqi aggression.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 5, 1996

Mr. DASCHLE (for Mr. LOTT) (for himself, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. THURMOND,

and Mr. WARNER) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Regarding the United States response to Iraqi aggression.

Whereas the United States and its allies have vital interests

in ensuring regional stability in the Persian Gulf;

Whereas on August 31, 1996, Saddam Hussein, despite

warnings from the United States, began an unprovoked,

unjustified, and brutal attack on the civilian population

in and around Irbil in northern Iraq, aligning himself

with one Kurdish faction to assault another, thereby

causing the deaths of hundreds of innocent civilians; and

Whereas the United States responded to Saddam Hussein’s

aggression on September 3, 1996, by destroying some of

the Iraqi air defense installations and announcing the expansion of the southern no-fly zone over Iraq: Now,

therefore, be it
2

SRES 288 ATS

1 Resolved, That the Senate commends the military ac2 tions taken by and the performance of the United States

3 Armed Forces, under the direction of the Commander-in4 Chief, for carrying out this military mission in a highly

5 professional, efficient and effective manner.

Æ
# L_2008065EN.01001001.xml

| 8.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 65/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 65/10

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 28 February 2008

on the conclusion of the Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union

(2008/207/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 310 in conjunction with the second sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) and the second subparagraph of Article 300(3) thereof,

Having regard to the 2005 Act of Accession, and in particular Article 6(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the assent of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | The Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part (2), was signed on behalf of the Community and its Member States at Brussels on 31 October 2007. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part (2), was signed on behalf of the Community and its Member States at Brussels on 31 October 2007.

| (2) | The Protocol should be approved, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Protocol should be approved,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union is hereby approved on behalf of the Community and its Member States.

The text of the Protocol is attached to this Decision (3).

Done at Brussels, 28 February 2008.

For the Council

The President

D. MATE

---

(1)  Assent of 19 February 2008 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 147, 21.6.2000, p. 3.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 317, 5.12.2007, p. 65.

3

---
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 690 

To require each agency, in providing notice of a rule making, to include 

a link to a 100 word plain language summary of the proposed rule. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2015 

Mr. LUETKEMEYER (for himself and Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New 

York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require each agency, in providing notice of a rule making, 

to include a link to a 100 word plain language summary 

of the proposed rule. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Providing Account5 ability Through Transparency Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO POST A 100 WORD SUMMARY TO 

7 REGULATIONS.GOV. 

8 Section 553(b) of title 5, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 690 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (2) by striking ‘‘; and’’ and in2 serting ‘‘;’’; 

3 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at 

4 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (3) by inserting after paragraph (3) the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(4) the internet address of a summary of not 

8 more than 100 words in length of the proposed rule, 

9 in plain language, that shall be posted on the inter10 net website under section 206(d) of the E-Govern11 ment Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. 3501 note) (commonly 

12 known as regulations.gov);’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
(logo)BERKADIA

 

 

Annual Statement asto Compliance

For the Year EndedDecember 31, 2017

 

*Deutsch Mortgage& Asset Receiving Corporation,*

*COMM Series2014-UBS6*

 

Pursuantto Section 10.11 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement governing the referencedtransaction (the “Servicing Agreement”), I hereby attest that:

 

        i.           Areview of the activities and performance of Berkadia as Subservicer during theperiod has been made under my supervision.

 

      ii.           To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, Berkadia as Subservicer hasfulfilled, in all material respects, its obligations under this SubservicingAgreement throughout the period and no default by the Subservicer under thePooling and Servicing Agreement has occurred and is continuing.

 

Berkadia,

 

/s/Mark E. McCool

MarkE. McCool

President

February10, 2018
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliancefor COMM 2014-LC17 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates

 

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of September 1, 2014 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

/s/Jeffrey Coletta

Jeffrey Coletta

Assistant Secretary 

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.