alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 135

Congratulating the people of the Republic of Liberia for holding multiparty

elections.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 30, 1997

Mr. PAYNE (for himself, Ms. PELOSI, and Mr. OWENS) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Congratulating the people of the Republic of Liberia for

holding multiparty elections.

Whereas the people of Liberia have suffered during the 7-

year civil war with over 400,000 deaths and 2,300,000

displaced;

Whereas the war of April 6, 1996, marked the lowest time

where war had devastated and disrupted the livelihood of

the people of Liberia;

Whereas the international community did not concentrate its

efforts and resources on the registration process;

Whereas the United States logistical training of some 500 policemen that supported the electoral process was welcomed by the Liberian people;
2

•HCON 135 IH

Whereas almost 90 percent of the Liberian people came out

to vote with the highest turnout being women;

Whereas illiteracy by civil society contributed to problems

with voting in the rural areas;

Whereas the historic event of democratic multiparty elections

was a vote for ‘‘peace’’ and should be acknowledged as

such;

Whereas election results of July 19, 1997, generally reflected

the wishes of the people; and

Whereas Charles Chankey Taylor was elected to the presidency by 75 percent of the electorate: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) congratulates the people of Liberia for hold4 ing multiparty presidential, legislative, and senato5 rial elections by proportional representation;

6 (2) congratulates ECOWAS and Independent

7 Elections Commission (IECOM) for their support

8 during the elections;

9 (3) encourages the people of Liberia to uphold

10 peace and continue to work together after taking the

11 first critical step of holding a democratic election;

12 (4) encourages the United States to provide

13 technical and financial assistance when the country

14 has shown improvements in creating stability for its

15 people;
3

•HCON 135 IH

1 (5) strongly urges the international community

2 to continue to assist Liberia to disarm and demobi3 lize and help with the repatriation of refugees;

4 (6) calls on all faction and opposition leaders to

5 respect the outcome of the elections and make a vow

6 to peace and stability of Liberia; and

7 (7) calls on the newly elected President to re8 spect the rule of law and human rights.

Æ
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 6, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-31059 Summary Calendar

EDWARD SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION INC.; ET AL., Defendants, AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:04-CV-284

-------------------- Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Edward Smith (“Smith”) appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion for relief from judgment in which he challenged the district court’s dismissal of his claim against the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”) on the basis of arbitral immunity. Smith has filed a motion for leave to proceedNo. 04-31059 -2- in forma pauperis (“IFP”) on appeal following the district court’s denial of IFP status. A movant for leave to proceed IFP on appeal must show that he is a pauper and the appeal is taken in good faith, i.e., the appeal presents nonfrivolous issues. Carson v. Polley , 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Smith asserts that the AAA is not immune from civil liability because the arbitrator engaged in “non judicial action” regarding his motion for contempt. Smith cites to Mireles v. Waco , 502 U.S. 9 (1991) in support of his argument. As the district court determined, Smith’s reliance on Mireles is misplaced. Mireles supports the district court’s determination that the arbitrator’s actions in the instant case, relating to the disposition of Smith’s motion for contempt, was an action taking in the arbitrator’s quasi-judicial capacity in the administration of the arbitration proceedings. See Mireles , 502 U.S. at 12. As such, the claim against the AAA is barred by arbitral immunity. See Hawkins v. Nat’l Ass’n of Sec. Dealers , Inc. , 149 F.3d 330, 332 (5th Cir. 1998). Thus, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Smith’s motion for relief from judgment. See Carimi v. Royal Carribean Cruise Line,

Inc. , 959 F.2d 1344, 1345 (5th Cir. 1992). Smith has failed to show that he will raise any nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, his IFP motion is DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.No. 04-31059 -3- Smith is WARNED that he may be subject to sanctions if he makes any further frivolous filings.
MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 19 Indefinitely Postponed Senate (IPS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 19

   To express the sense of the Senate relating to committee funding.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Lott (for Mr. Dole) (for himself, Mr. Daschle, Mr. Domenici, Mr. 
 Mack, and Mr. Nickles) submitted the following resolution; which was 
                         indefinitely postponed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   To express the sense of the Senate relating to committee funding.

    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the Committee on 
Rules and Administration when it reports the committee funding 
resolution for 1995-96 it should reduce funding for committees by 15 
percent from the level provided for 1993-94.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

 

The undersigned, Sterling H.McDonald, Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of Evolution PetroleumCorporation (the “Company”), certifies in connection with the filing with theSecurities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, tohis knowledge, that:

 

1. The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this certification as of the 14th day of May, 2010.

 
|   | /s/ STERLING H. MCDONALD                    |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|   | Sterling H. McDonald                        |
|   | Vice-President and Chief  Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to EvolutionPetroleum Corporation and will be retained by Evolution Petroleum Corporationand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.  The foregoing certificate isbeing furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to thisForm 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.

 

----
#### BENIHANA OF TOKYO, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ANGELO, GORDON & CO., L.P., Benihana, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-966-cv

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

February 23, 2018.

FOR APPELLANT: Joseph L. Manson III, Law Offices of Joseph L. Manson III, Alexandria, Virginia.

FOR APPELLEES: Nicole Gueron, Clariek Gueron Reisbaum LLP, New York, New York.

' PRESENT: BARRINGTON D. PARKER, PETER W. HALL, RAYMOND J. LOHIER, JR., Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

. The district court found that Appellee Angelo, Gordon *&*Co., L.P. (“AGC”) had been fraudulently-joined as a defendant in the action to defeat diversity jurisdiction, denied Appellant’s motion to remand this case to New York state court, and dismissed the case in its entirety. Appellant argues the ease should have been remanded. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, procedural history, and issues on appeal, which we recite here only to the extent necessary to explain our reasoning.

We examine a district court’s decision on a motion to remand *de novo. Bounds v. Pine Belt Mental Health Care Res.,*593 F.3d 209, 214 (2d Cir. 2010).

Federal district courts have original jurisdiction over civil actions between “citi*86zens of different States” where the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). “[E]ach plaintiffs citizenship must be different from the citizenship of each defendant” for the district court to have diversity jurisdiction. *Briarpatch Ltd., L.P v. Phoenix Pictures, Inc.,*373 F.3d 296, 302 (2d Cir. 2004).

It is well established in this Circuit that “a plaintiff may not defeat a federal court’s diversity jurisdiction and a defendant’s right of removal by merely joining as [a] defendant! ] [a] partly] with no real connection with the controversy.” *Pampillonia v. RJR Nabisco, Inc.,*138 F.3d 459, 460-61 (2d Cir. 1998). Under the doctrine of fraudulent joinder, courts overlook the presence of a non-diverse defendant if “there is no possibility, based on the pleadings, that [the] plaintiff can state a cause of action against the non-diverse defendant in state court.” *Id.*at 461. “The defendant seeking removal bears a heavy burden of proving fraudulent joinder” by clear and convincing evidence. *Id.*

Here, Appellant claims tortious interference with contract against AGC. Appellant’s complaint itself, however, pleads the elements of the affirmative defense of economic interest under New York law. *See White Plains Coat & Apron Co. v. Cintas Corp.,*8 N.Y.3d 422, 835 N.Y.S.2d 530, 867 N.E.2d 381, 383-84 (2007); *Foster v. Churchill,*87 N.Y.2d 744, 642 N.Y.S.2d 583, 665 N.E.2d 153, 154 (1996). It is thus legally impossible for Appellant to assert its claim against AGC in state court.

We have considered all of Appellant’s arguments and conclude that they are without merit. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of AmREIT Monthly Income &
Growth Fund IV, L.P. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Chad C. Braun, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in my capacity
as an officer of the General Partner of the Company, that, to my knowledge:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                     
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and               
| | 2. | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|      |  |                |       |                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|----- |  | -------------- | ----- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: |  | March 10,
2010 | By:   | /s/ Chad C. Braun                                                                                                                                                                               
|      |  |                | Name: | Chad C. Braun                                                                                                                                                                                   
|      |  |                | Title | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth IV Corporation, the General Partner of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund IV, L.P.

---
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 23, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 16475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06152]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than April 7, 2022.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Holly A. Rieser, Manager) 
P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034. Comments can also be sent 
electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f3b09c9e9e969d8780dd9283839f9a9092879a9c9d80b380879f80dd958191dd9c8194"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7f3c1012121a110b0c511e0f0f13161c1e0b1610110c3f0c0b130c51190d1d51100d18">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. The George N. Schulte Trust, George N. Schulte, as trustee, both 
of Dixon, Missouri; David R. Tritten and Elizabeth A. Tritten, both of 
Waynesville, Missouri; Beth A. Wright and Richard R. Wright, both of 
Iberia, Missouri; to retain voting shares of Milco Bancorporation, 
Inc., and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Bank of Iberia, 
both of Iberia, Missouri.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 18, 
2022.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-06152 Filed 3-22-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 289

Electing Gregory S. Casey, of Idaho, as the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper

of the Senate.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 6, 1996

Mr. LOTT submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed

to

RESOLUTION

Electing Gregory S. Casey, of Idaho, as the Sergeant at

Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate.

1 Resolved, That Gregory S. Casey, of Idaho, be, and

2 he is hereby, elected Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper

3 of the Senate.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 189 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 189

To designate Wednesday, November 1, 1995, as ``National Drug Awareness 
                                 Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 31, 1995

   Mr. Grassley (for himself, Mr. Biden, Mr. Dole, Mr. D'Amato, Mr. 
Murkowski, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Abraham, Mr. Helms, Mr. Pressler, Mr. Bryan, 
   Mr. Thurmond, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Nickles, Mr. Coverdell, and Mr. 
 Stevens) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To designate Wednesday, November 1, 1995, as ``National Drug Awareness 
                                 Day''.

Whereas illegal drug use among the youth of America is on the increase;
Whereas illegal drug use is a major health problem, ruining thousands of lives 
        and costing billions of dollars;
Whereas illegal drug use contributes to crime on the streets and in the homes of 
        this nation;
Whereas national attention has turned from illegal drug use to other issues, and 
        support for sustained programs has decreased;
Whereas public awareness and sustained programs are essential to combat an on-
        going social problem;
Whereas the answer to the illegal drug problem lies in America's communities, 
        with local people involved in grass roots activities to keep their 
        communities safe and drug free, and in encouraging personal 
        responsibility;
Whereas the annual Red Ribbon Celebration, coordinated by the National Family 
        Partnership and involving over 80,000,000 Americans in prevention 
        activities each year, commemorates the sacrifices of people on the front 
        lines in the war against illegal drug use;
Whereas substance abuse prevention, law enforcement, international narcotics 
        control, and community awareness efforts contributes to preventing young 
        people from starting illegal drug use; and
Whereas the American people have a continuing responsibility to combat illegal 
        drug use: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate designate Wednesday, November 1, 1995, as 
``National Drug Awareness Day''.
                                 .<all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-13772) of our report dated April 24,
2002, relating to the financial statements of Satyam Computer Services Limited,
which appears in this Annual Report on Form 20-F.

/s/ Price Waterhouse
Secunderabad, India
July 1, 2002
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0257 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. PAUL KERMIT GYSLER,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 18, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 12 2024

02/12/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0257
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 AND 15d-14

UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934, AS AMENDED



I, Ronald Cogburn, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A for
the year ended December 31, of Exela Technologies, Inc.;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: June 12, 2020



| | /s/ Ronald Cogburn                                          
| | ------------------------------------------------------------
| | Name: Ronald Cogburn                                        
| | Title: Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
#### IN RE: Jermaine Jerrell SIMS, a/k/a Justice, a/k/a Jus, Petitioner.

No. 17-1338

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 20, 2017

Decided: June 22, 2017

Jermaine Jerrell Sims, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jermaine Jerrell Sims petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order direct-, ing the district court to transfer *United States v. Sims,*No. 3:98-cr-00045, from the Alexandria Division to the Richmond Division of the Eastern District of Virginia for any further proceedings. We conclude that Sims is not entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. *Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court,*426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976); *United States v. Moussaoui,*333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. *In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n,*860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988).

Because Sims has shown neither extraordinary circumstances nor his clear right to the transfer, he is not entitled mandamus relief. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED*