alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1669/2004

of 23 September 2004         

fixing the maximum reduction in the duty on sorghum imported in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 238/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 12(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For tenders notified from 17 to 23 September 2004, pursuant to the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 238/2004, the maximum reduction in the duty on sorghum imported shall be 39,28 EUR/t and be valid for a total maximum quantity of 4 300 t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 24 September 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 September 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 40, 12.2.2004, p. 23.

(3)OJ L 177, 28.7.1995, p. 4. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2235/2000 (OJ L 256, 10.10.2000, p. 13).

----
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 49

Providing for certain corrections to be made in the enrollment of the bill

(H.R. 2854) to modify the operation of certain agricultural programs.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 27 (legislative day, MARCH 26), 1996

Mr. LUGAR submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for certain corrections to be made in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 2854) to modify the operation

of certain agricultural programs.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That the Clerk of the House of Representa3 tives, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 2854) to modify

4 the operation of certain agricultural programs, shall make

5 the following corrections:

6 In section 215—

7 (1) in paragraph (1), insert ‘‘and’’ at the end;

8 (2) in paragraph (2), strike ‘‘; and’’ at the end

9 and insert a period; and
2

•SCON 49 ATS

1 (3) strike paragraph (3).

Æ
## MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN** 

**AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**
FAA - 2013 - 0984 Docket Number 2013 - SW - 0 2 2 -AD Directorate Identifier Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket - NPRM Eurocopt er Emergency Alert Service Bulletin No. 76A001, Revision 0, dated April 22, 2013



### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region Rules Docket 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 Fort W orth, Texas 76137 **DUR ING THE HOURS OF:**  9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operation of the Company.
 HOMELAND SECURITY CAPITAL CORPORATIONNovember 15, 2010
    By:
    /s/ C. Thomas McMillenName:
    C. Thomas McMillenTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer
Principal Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6680

SHAWN E. PAULING, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COLIE RUSHTON, Warden of McCormick Correctional Institution; HENRY MCMASTER, Attorney General of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (CA-03-619-2-25) Submitted: June 10, 2004 Decided: June 21, 2004 Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Shawn E. Pauling, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Creighton Waters, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Shawn E. Pauling seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U. S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Pauling has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
January 20, 2016

Mr. Thomas Haun

VP of Strategy and Globalization

PrecisionHawk

9001 Glenwood Avenue

Suite 100

Raleigh, NC 27617-8779

Dear Mr. Haun:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§ 91.121 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your January 7, 2016, exemption request on behalf of PrecisionHawk into the 

public docket (No. FAA-2016-0368), but we are unable to process your request any further. 

The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). 

For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brandon Roberts

Manager, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
3
Exhibit 35.3

SERVICER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB UNDER THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

|   | Re: | HSBC Home Equity Loan Trust 2006-4 |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------|

I, James F. Vacca, Vice President, Item Processing, of HSBC Technology & Services (USA) Inc., (the “Company”), pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB under the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 3.10(a) of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of December 14, 2006 (the “Agreement”), among HSBC Home Equity Loan Corporation I, as Depositor, HSBC Finance Corporation, as Servicer, HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as Administrator, and [U.S. Bank National Association], as Trustee, and hereby certify that:

 

|   | 1. | A review of the activities of the Company from December 14, 2006 through December 31, 2006 and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period referred to above except as set forth below: |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | NONE |
|--------|------|

 

|   | IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate this 5th day of March 2007. |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

HSBC Technology & Services (USA) Inc.

 

|   | By: | /s/ James F. Vacca |
|--------|-----|--------------------|

|   | Name: | James F. Vacca |
|--------|-------|----------------|

|   | Title: | Vice President, Item Processing |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------|
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) or RULE 15d-14(a),
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Carl J. Johnson, President and Chief Executive Officer of Matrixx
Initiatives, Inc., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Matrixx Initiatives,
Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. Date: November 10, 2004/s/ Carl J. JohnsonCarl J. JohnsonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 105 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 105

   Expressing the sense of the Congress relating to the elections in 
                  Albania scheduled for June 29, 1997.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 1997

Mr. Traficant submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
          referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of the Congress relating to the elections in 
                  Albania scheduled for June 29, 1997.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) the elections in Albania scheduled for June 29, 1997, 
        should be free and open; and
            (2) all political parties of Albania should honor the 
        results of such elections.
                                 <all>
```
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 152

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that all parpeace process. standing human rights violations as part of the rights standards and adequately address out- fully integrate internationally recognized human Northern Ireland should condemn violence and ties to the multiparty peace talks regarding
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 152

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas multiparty talks regarding Northern Ireland attended by representatives of the British and Irish Governments and representatives elected from political parties in Northern Ireland are underway for the first time

since the partition of Ireland in 1922 creating a momentous opportunity for progress on human rights concerns;
2

•HCON 152 EH

Whereas human rights violations and the lack of accountability by those responsible for such violations have been persistent features of the conflict in Northern Ireland; and

Whereas more than 3,000 people have died and thousands

more have been injured as a result of the political violence in Northern Ireland since 1969: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) the Congress condemns the violence com4 mitted on all sides of the conflict in Northern Ire5 land as illegal, unjust, and inhumane;

6 (2) the Congress commends the leadership in

7 both the British and Irish Governments and former

8 United States Senator George Mitchell, Independent

9 Chairman of the multiparty talks, for fostering a

10 new environment in which human rights concerns

11 may be addressed and an agreement may be reached

12 expeditiously through inclusive talks with respect to

13 Northern Ireland; and

14 (3) it is the sense of the Congress that—

15 (A) all parties should reject violence and

16 work diligently through democratic, peaceful

17 means to reach a just and lasting peace in

18 Northern Ireland;

19 (B) human rights should be protected for

20 all citizens and any peace agreement in North-
3

•HCON 152 EH

1 ern Ireland must recognize the state’s obliga2 tion to protect human rights in all cir3 cumstances; and

4 (C) there are a number of measures which

5 can be taken immediately that would remedy

6 abusive human rights policies and build con7 fidence in the peace process, such as acting

8 upon the Standing Advisory Commission on

9 Human Rights (SACHR) report and rec10 ommendations put forth by other human rights

11 organizations.

Passed the House of Representatives March 18,

1998.

Attest:

Clerk.
BORDER COAST REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY 

150 Dale Rupert Road Telephone: (707)464-7288 

Crescent City, CA 95531 • . Fax:(707)464-1023 

Managing Airport Operations at Del Norte County Regional Airport/Jack McNamara Field (CEC), Crescent City, California 

Dennis J DeVany :~> 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division - . i 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

•. • '"" ' S 

• ^ • - :„ ) 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 51^ 

. ; c5 

This comment letter is in response to your letter of April 21, 2010, to Mayor Kelly Schellong of CreScent Citjrin regard 

to the CEC EAS bid recieived from Skywest for the period August 1, 2010 through July 31, 2012. Crescent City, 

repre.Sented by Mayor Kelly Schellong, is a member of the recently formed Border Coast Regional Airport Authority 

who's mission is to operate and manage the CEC Regional Airport. The Ctescent City region looks forward to 

continued reliable Essential Air Service from Skywest Airlines. 

We understand the new EAS bid includes elimination of the Sacramento leg. Although we regret losing service to the 

state capitol, it appears that the greatest average passenger traffic is consistently into SFO. We <vould like to request the 

airlines work with us to create a schedule best suited to the needs of our users. A schedule that enhances the growth of 

passenger enplanements currently experienced and forecast to continue for this regional airport. 

Thank You for your continued assistance and support. 

Regards, 

<LA5VW\.C8 - ^^^:S!i3<z::>^'i-=''--*^--*T 

James Bernard 

Airport Director
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 182 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 182

      Relating to the appointment of Deputy Senate Legal Counsel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             October 12 (legislative day, October 10), 1995

    Mr. Dole (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Relating to the appointment of Deputy Senate Legal Counsel.

    Resolved, That the appointment of Morgan J. Frankel to be Deputy 
Senate Legal Counsel, made by the President pro tempore this day, shall 
become effective as of October 24, 1995, and the term of service of the 
appointee shall expire at the end of the One Hundred Fifth Congress.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 94-7481

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

STACEY LAMAR MARSH,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 98-6408

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

STACEY LAMAR MARSH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Charles H. Haden II, Chief

District Judge. (CR-91-114, CA-94-399-3)

Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 22, 1998
2

Before MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and HALL and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stacey Lamar Marsh, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28

U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998)). We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Marsh, Nos. CR-91-114; CA-94-399-3

(S.D.W. Va. Nov. 2, 1994, and Feb. 5, 1998). See Lindh v. Murphy,

521 U.S. 320 (1997). Further, we deny as moot Appellant’s motions

to amend or supplement his § 2255 motion, to place appeal in abeyance, and for other general relief. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Order filed September 3 , 2020

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00645

- CV

____________ CRYSTAL DOLGENER , Appellant

V.

STEVEN DOLGENER , Appellee

On Appeal from the 280th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca u se No. 2019

- 27998



### ORDER
App ellant’s brief discloses the name s of a person s who w ere minor s when the underlying suit was filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.9(a)(3). Accordingly, the brief
is stricken

. Appellant is ordered to file a brief that compli es with Tex as Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.9 on or before September 14, 2020.

PER CURIAM
Panel Consists of Justices Spain, Hassan, and Poissant.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JUSTIN T. FRIEND, DOC #C09751, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4657 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed May 8, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Joseph A. Bulone, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 35.12



|     |  |  |  |                                                                         
|---- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  |  |  | CMBS Department 
MAC N9401-011 1055 10th Avenue SE
Minneapolis, MN 55414

Citibank, N.A.

388 Greenwich
Street

14th Floor

New York, New York 10013



|RE: | Annual Statement of Compliance for GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commercial Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-GC24

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014 (the Agreement), the
undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian (Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period):

(a) A review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such
officers supervision; and

(b) To the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.



|              
|--------------
|March 17, 2016
|              
|LOGO          
|GAIL VANNEST  
|Vice President



LOGO
# C_2018066EN.01000101.xml

| 21.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 66/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 66/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2016-2017 SESSION

Sittings of 27 and 28 April 2016

The Minutes of this session have been published in

  OJ C 190, 15.6.2017
  .

The Minutes of this session have been published in

OJ C 190, 15.6.2017

The texts adopted of 28 April 2016 concerning the discharge for the financial year 2014 have been published in

  OJ L 246, 14.9.2016
  .

The texts adopted of 28 April 2016 concerning the discharge for the financial year 2014 have been published in

OJ L 246, 14.9.2016

TEXTS ADOPTED

---