alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 170 (Wednesday, September 3, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 52275-52276]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-20788]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 271

[EPA-R06-RCRA-2013-0624; FRL 9915-98-Region 6]

Texas: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management 
Program Revisions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The State of Texas has applied to the Environmental Protection 
Agency (EPA) for Final authorization of the changes to its hazardous 
waste program under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). 
EPA proposes to grant Final authorization to the State of Texas. In the 
``Rules and Regulations'' section of this Federal Register, EPA is

[[Page 52276]]

authorizing the changes by direct final rule. EPA did not make a 
proposal prior to the direct final rule because we believe this action 
is not controversial and do not expect comments that oppose it. We have 
explained the reasons for this authorization in the preamble to the 
direct final rule. Unless we get written comments which oppose this 
authorization during the comment period, the direct final rule will 
become effective on the date it establishes, and we will not take 
further action on this proposal. If we receive comments that oppose 
this action, we will withdraw the direct final rule and it will not 
take effect. We will then respond to public comments in a later final 
rule based on this proposal. You may not have another opportunity for 
comment. If you want to comment on this action, you must do so at this 
time.

DATES: Send your written comments by October 3, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Alima Patterson, Region 6, Regional 
Authorization Coordinator, (6PD-O), Multimedia Planning and Permitting 
Division, at the address shown below. You can examine copies of the 
materials submitted by the State of Texas during normal business hours 
at the following locations: EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, 
Texas 75202-2733, phone number (214) 665-8533; or Texas Commission on 
Environmental Quality, (TCEQ) 12100 Park S. Circle, and Austin, Texas 
78753-3087, (512) 239-6079. Comments may also be submitted 
electronically or through hand delivery/courier; please follow the 
detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section of the direct final rule 
which is located in the Rules section of this Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alima Patterson (214) 665-8533.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information, please see the 
direct final rule published in the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of 
this Federal Register.

    Dated: August 5, 2014.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2014-20788 Filed 9-2-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
N O T F O RP U B L IC A T IO NIN W E S T ' S H AWA I # I RE P O R T S A N D P A C IF IC RE P O R T E R



### NO. CAAP-22-0000004

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

O F THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

RK-H, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MK-H, Defendant-Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

(CASE NO. FC-D 08-1-2490)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL (By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Leonard and McCullen, JJ.) Upon review of the record, it appears that:(1) On December 30, 2021, self-represented DefendantAppellant MK-H conventionally filed a "Letter of Notice," construed as a notice of appeal in the underlying case, FC-D No. 08-1-2490, without the fees required by Hawai # i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 3(a);

(2) On January 5, 2022, the clerk electronically filed the notice of appeal to create the appeal in CAAP-22-0000004;

(3) On January 12, 2022, the appellate clerk entered a notice of non-payment, instructing MK-H to pay the filing fee or request a fee waiver on or before January 24, 2022, or the appeal could be dismissed. The appellate clerk mailed the notice of non-payment to MK-H's address on the notice of appeal, and no return mail was received;

(4) The record on appeal was due on or before March 7, 2022, see HRAP Rule 11(b)(1), but MK-H failed to pay the filing fee or request a fee waiver from this court; Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-22-0000004 13-APR-2022 08:29 AM Dkt. 9 ODSDN O T F O RP U B L IC A T IO NIN W E S T ' S H AWA I # I RE P O R T S A N D P A C IF IC RE P O R T E R



### (5) On March 10, 2022, the appellate clerk entered a default of the record on appeal, informing MK-H that the time to docket the appeal had expired, MK-H had not paid the filing fee or obtained an order allowing him to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis , the matter would be brought to the court's attention on March 21, 2022, for action that may include dismissal of the appeal, and MK-H could seek relief from default by motion. The appellate clerk mailed the default notice to MK-H's address on the notice of appeal, but the United States Postal Service returned the envelope, marked, "Return to Sender, Not Deliverable as Addressed, Unable to Forward"; and

(6) MK-H has not filed a notice of change of address, consistent with HRAP Rule 25(f), or taken any further action in this appeal. An appeal may be dismissed where the record on appeal has not been prepared because the appellant failed to pay the required fees or obtain an order allowing the appellant to proceed in forma pauperis . HRAP Rule 11(b)(2), (c)(2).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, April 13, 2022.
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza Chief Judge
/s/ Katherine G. Leonard Associate Judge /s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen Associate Judge

2
#### Jerry Lee KEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-7391

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 15, 2018

Decided: February 20, 2018

Jerry Lee Key, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jerry Lee Key appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying Key’s motion for a certificate of innocence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2513 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for *275the reasons stated by the district court. *Key v. United States,*No. 2:17-cv-00556, 2017 WL 4399553 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 29, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
# Official Journal L 248/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.248.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 248 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5424 September 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.248.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 248

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5424 September 2011

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 939/2011 of 23 September 2011 correcting Regulation (EC) No 617/2008 laying down detailed rules for implementing Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 as regards marketing standards for eggs for hatching and farmyard poultry chicks | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 939/2011 of 23 September 2011 correcting Regulation (EC) No 617/2008 laying down detailed rules for implementing Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 as regards marketing standards for eggs for hatching and farmyard poultry chicks

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
(logo)Rialto

CAPITAL

 

 

**2018 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item1123)**

 

 

Poolingand Servicing Agreement (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement") datedas of September 1, 2014 by and among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage SecuritiesCorp., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as MasterServicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as successor Special Servicer toCWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer, Wilmington Trust, NationalAssociation, as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as CertificateAdministrator, and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor relatingto the JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2014-C23, Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-C23 **(JPMBB 2014-C23)**

 

Theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, asspecial servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.       All servicing activities and performanceof such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement areperformed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2.       A review of the servicing activities andperformance by the Special Servicer for the period of July 5, 2018 to December31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling and ServicingAgreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3.       To the best of my knowledge, based on suchreview, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theterms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for theReporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any suchobligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and statusthereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

Certifiedby: /s/ Adam Singer

AdamSinger, Managing Director 

 

Date:March 1, 2019
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 82

To petition the States to convene a Conference of the States to consider

a Balanced Budget Amendment to the Constitution.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 2 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1995

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. HELMS) submitted the following resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

To petition the States to convene a Conference of the States

to consider a Balanced Budget Amendment to the Constitution.

Whereas Article I of the Constitution of the United States of

America provides that the Congress is vested with the authority to lay and collect taxes, to pay the debts of the

United States, to borrow money on the credit of the

United States, and to appropriate money from the Treasury;

Whereas for the past quarter century Congress has been unable to balance the Nation’s budget in any year;

Whereas the President of the United States has submitted a

budget which increases the deficit in future years;
2

•SRES 82 IS

Whereas Members of Congress have been unable to agree on

language for an Amendment to the Constitution which

would require a balanced budget; and

Whereas Congress has therefore attempted to deny the several States of the United States the opportunity to vote

on a Constitutional Amendment requiring a balanced

budget: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That Congress hereby petitions the several

2 States of the United States of America to convene a Con3 ference of the States for the express and exclusive purpose

4 of drafting an Amendment to the Constitution of the

5 United States requiring a balanced budget and prohibiting

6 the imposition of unfunded mandates on the States, and

7 that such States then consider whether it is necessary for

8 the States to convene a Constitutional Convention pursu9 ant to Article V of the Constitution of the United States

10 in order to adopt such Amendment.

Æ
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 268

Expressing the sense of the Senate with respect to the summit of Arab

heads of state being held in Cairo beginning on June 21, 1996.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 21, 1996

Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself, Mr. BROWN, and Mr. LIEBERMAN) submitted

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign

Relations

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate with respect to the summit of Arab heads of state being held in Cairo beginning

on June 21, 1996.

Whereas Benjamin Netanyahu was elected to the position of

Prime Minister of Israel on May 29, 1996;

Whereas Prime Minister-elect Netanyahu presented his cabinet for approval to the Israeli Knesset on June 18, 1996;

Whereas the guidelines of the new Government of Israel specifically state: ‘‘The Government of Israel will work to

broaden the circle of peace with all of its neighbors.’’;

Whereas Egyptian President Mubarak has invited heads of

state of Algeria, Bahrain, Comoros, Djibouti, Jordan,

Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman,

Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, the
2

•SRES 268 IS

United Arab Emirates, Yemen, and the Palestine Liberation Organization to attend an Arab summit in Cairo beginning on June 21, 1996; and

Whereas President Clinton has stated his hope that Arab

leaders who attend this summit will ‘‘give Mr. Netanyahu

an opportunity to constitute his government and set a

policy and not presume that we can’t pursue peace.’’:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate urges the governments at2 tending the June 21, 1996, summit in Cairo, and other

3 governments in the Middle East to—

4 (1) reaffirm their commitment to a comprehen5 sive peace in the Middle East;

6 (2) express their willingness to work with the

7 democratically elected Government of Israel in the

8 pursuit of a meaningful peace; and

9 (3) refrain from statements directed against the

10 new Israeli government that might create an atmos11 phere in the region unfavorable to a continuation of

12 the peace process.

Æ
----

**Exhibit32**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,United States Code)**

Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersignedofficers of PREFERENCIAL EQUITIES CORP., a Nevada corporation (the"Company"), does hereby certify, [to such officer's knowledge], that:

The Form10-K for year ended December 31, 2009****(the"Form *10-K*") of theCompany fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form *10-K* fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                   

| Dated: March 25, 2010 | /s/ Harry Miller  ___________________________________ |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                       | Harry Miller, Chief Executive Officer                 |
| Dated: March 25, 2010 | /s/ Harry Miller  ___________________________________ |
|                       | Harry Miller, Chief Financial Officer                 |

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 AND 15d-14

UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934, AS AMENDED



I, Shrikant Sortur, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A for
the year ended December 31, 2019 of Exela Technologies, Inc.;
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: June 12, 2020



| | /s/ Shrikant Sortur                                                        
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Name: Shrikant Sortur                                                      
| | Title: Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
## In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 22

- 00107

- CR

RAHEEM KERRY ONEIL MARSHALL , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 123rd District Court

Panola County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018

- C

- 248

Before Stevens , C.J., van Cleef and Rambin , JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice van Cleef2 

### ME MORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Raheem Kerry Oneil Marshall has filed a motion to dismiss this appe al. The

motion was signed by both Marshal l and his appel late counsel in compliance with Rule 42.2(a)

of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a). As authorized by Rule

42.2(a), we grant the motion. See id.

Accordingly, we dis mis s this appeal.

Charles van Cleef

Justice

Date Subm itted: January 23, 2023

Date Decided: January 24, 2023

Do Not Publish
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 260

To express the sense of the Senate that livestock producers who are not

eligible for emergency livestock feed assistance in the 1996 crop year,

and who have suffered feed losses due to drought, flooding, or other

natural disasters in 1996, should receive special consideration for assistance from commodities or the sale of commodities currently available

in the disaster reserve established under section 813 of the Agricultural

Act of 1970, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 12, 1996

Mr. DOMENICI (for himself, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. GRAMM, Mrs. HUTCHISON,

and Mr. PRESSLER) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To express the sense of the Senate that livestock producers

who are not eligible for emergency livestock feed assistance in the 1996 crop year, and who have suffered

feed losses due to drought, flooding, or other natural

disasters in 1996, should receive special consideration

for assistance from commodities or the sale of commodities currently available in the disaster reserve established

under section 813 of the Agricultural Act of 1970, and

for other purposes.

1 Resolved,
2

•SRES 260 ATS

1 SECTION 1. SPECIAL CONSIDERATION FOR DISASTER AS2 SISTANCE.

3 It is the sense of the Senate that livestock producers

4 who do not qualify for emergency livestock feed assistance

5 for the 1996 crop year, but have incurred feed losses in

6 1996 due to drought, flooding, or other natural disasters,

7 should receive special consideration for assistance from

8 commodities or the sale of commodities currently available

9 in the disaster reserve established under section 813 of

10 the Agricultural Act of 1970 (7 U.S.C. 1427a). A livestock

11 producer should be eligible to receive the assistance during

12 the period beginning May 1, 1996, and ending not sooner

13 than August 31, 1996.

Æ
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit 11.1

Statement Re: Computation of Earnings Per Share         

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                       Three Months Ended                     Nine Months Ended
                                                          September 29                           September 29
                                                 ------------------------------         --------------------------------
                                                    1995                1996               1995                 1996
                                                    ----                ----               ----                 ----
<S>                                               <C>                 <C>                <C>                   <C> 
Weighted average shares outstanding               3,594,465           6,005,227          3,588,863             5,728,874
Net dilutive effect of stock
   options-based on the treasury
   stock method using the initial
   public offering price of
   $9.00 per share......................            670,023                                678,117
Effect of common and common
   equivalent shares issued by the
   Company during the twelve
   month period immediately
   preceeding the Company's
   registration for  initial public
   offering on August 2, 1996,
   as if they were outstanding for
   all periods presented prior to
   the registration for initial public
   offering, using the treasury stock
   method, as described above...........          1,858,875                              1,858,875               206,902
                                               ------------        ------------       ------------          ------------ 
Total shares                                      6,123,363           6,005,227          6,125,855             5,935,776
                                               ============        ============       ============          ============
Net income (loss)                               $   107,930         $  (969,681)       $   333,968           $(2,857,847)
                                               ============        ============       ============          ============
Net income (loss) per common and
   common share equivalent                      $      0.02         $     (0.16)       $      0.05           $     (0.48)
                                               ============        ============       ============          ============
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual  Report of VitaminSpice  (the "Company") on Form  10-K for the  period  ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof  (the "Report"),  I, Edward Bukstel, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Edward Bukstel By: Edward Bukstel Chief Executive and Financial Officer April 13, 2010