alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN RE: THE ESTATE OF PERRY M.

MCKEAN, DECEASED, JUNE L.

CONFER, ADMINISTRATRIX

PETITION OF: LARRY HAINES

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 683 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of February, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 54 (Monday, March 21, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 15990]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05848]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[FR ID 76989]


Deletion of Item From March 16, 2022 Open Meeting

March 15, 2022.
    The following item has been adopted by the Commission and deleted 
from the list of items scheduled for consideration at the Wednesday, 
March 16, 2022, Open Meeting. This item was previously listed in the 
Commission's Sunshine Notice on Wednesday, March 9, 2022.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4..................  Media.................  Title: Restricted
                                              Adjudicatory Matter.
                                             Summary: The Commission
                                              will consider a restricted
                                              adjudicatory matter.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
    The meeting will be webcast with open captioning at: www.fcc.gov/live. Open captioning will be provided as well as a text only version 
on the FCC website. Other reasonable accommodations for people with 
disabilities are available upon request. In your request, include a 
description of the accommodation you will need and a way we can contact 
you if we need more information. Last minute requests will be accepted 
but may be impossible to fill. Send an email to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0a6c69693f3a3e4a6c6969246d657c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1b7d78782e2b2f5b7d7878357c746d">[email protected]</span></a> or call 
the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530.
    Additional information concerning this meeting may be obtained from 
the Office of Media Relations, (202) 418-0500. Audio/Video coverage of 
the meeting will be broadcast live with open captioning over the 
internet from the FCC Live web page at www.fcc.gov/live.

Marlene Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-05848 Filed 3-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6138 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6138

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 560 East Pleasant Valley Road, Port Hueneme, California, as the U.S. 
  Naval Construction Battalion ``Seabees'' Fallen Heroes Post Office 
                               Building.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. U.S. NAVAL CONSTRUCTION BATTALION ``SEABEES'' FALLEN HEROES 
              POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 560 East Pleasant Valley Road, Port Hueneme, California, 
shall be known and designated as the ``U.S. Naval Construction 
Battalion `Seabees' Fallen Heroes Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``U.S. Naval 
Construction Battalion `Seabees' Fallen Heroes Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 30, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 6138

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 560 East Pleasant Valley Road, Port Hueneme, California, as the U.S. 
  Naval Construction Battalion ``Seabees'' Fallen Heroes Post Office 
                               Building.
```
798.05084
Dear Mr. Eastman:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition 

(Docket No. FAA−2015−3048). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Your petition references the material(s) listed below, however the material(s) was/were

not submitted for the record. Please provide a copy of the following referenced 

materials:

o Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM)

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at

www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or 

electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any 

further, we must receive the information described above by 11/16/16. If we do not receive the 

information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-4549.

Sincerely,

/s/

Michael Cameron

Program Analyst
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor

550 South Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL  ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and SITUS HOLDINGS, LLC as Operating Advisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, COMM 2014-UBS5 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

 

(logo) Together we’ll go far
EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                        For The Three Months Ended
                                                                October 31
                                                                ----------
                                                         2001                 2000
                                                     -------------       -------------
<S>                                                   <C>                   <C>
Shares outstanding                                    6,974,699             6,077,068
                                                      ---------             ---------

Weighted average shares outstanding                   6,973,987             6,007,158
Stock Options                                         1,815,625             1,412,675
Warrants                                                      -             1,797,500
                                                      ---------             ---------
  Total weighted average shares outstanding           8,789,612             9,217,333
                                                      =========             =========


Net income (loss)                                     $ (381,071)          $ (439,556)
                                                      ===========          ===========

Basic Net Earnings (Loss) per share                     $ (0.05)             $ (0.07)
                                                        ========             =======

Diluted Net Earnings (Loss) per share                   $ (0.05)             $ (0.07)
                                                        ========             =======
</TABLE>
Executive Order 14069

# Advancing Economy, Efficiency, and Effectiveness in Federal Contracting by Promoting Pay Equity and Transparency

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:

**Section 1**                    .                     *Policy.*                     It is the policy of my Administration to eliminate discriminatory pay practices that inhibit the economy, efficiency, and effectiveness of the Federal workforce and the procurement of property and services by the Federal Government. The Office of Personnel Management anticipates issuing a proposed rule that will address the use of salary history in the hiring and pay-setting processes for Federal employees, consistent with Executive Order 14035 of June 25, 2021 (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Federal Workforce). The purpose of this order is to direct the consideration of parallel efforts with respect to Federal procurement.                

**Sec. 2**                    .                     *Economy, Efficiency, and Effectiveness in Federal Procurement.*                     Consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations, the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council, in consultation with the Secretary of Labor and the heads of other executive departments and agencies as appropriate, shall consider issuing proposed rules to promote economy, efficiency, and effectiveness in Federal procurement by enhancing pay equity and transparency for job applicants and employees of Federal contractors and subcontractors. In doing so, the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council shall specifically consider whether any such rules should limit or prohibit Federal contractors and subcontractors from seeking and considering information about job applicants' and employees' existing or past compensation when making employment decisions. The Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council shall also consider the inclusion of appropriate accountability measures in any such rules.                

**Sec. 3**                    .                     *General Provisions.*                     (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:                

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

[FR Doc. 2022-05949

Billing code 3395-F2-P
#### Frederick Hamilton BANKS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles RATLEDGE; Mark Hornak; David Hicton; Robert Cessar; United States Marshals Service; Jefferson B. Sessions III, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 17-7355

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 30, 2018

Decided: February 2, 2018

Frederick Hamilton Banks, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Frederick Hamilton Banks appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition, as well as its Order denying Banks’ self-styled . motion to vacate that order and judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. *See Banks v. Ratledge,*No. 5:16-hc-02219-D (E.D.N.C. Aug. 14, 2017 *&*Oct. 10, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
# Official Journal L 423/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 423 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6426 November 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 423

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6426 November 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | UN Regulation No 154 – Uniform provisions concerning the approval of light duty passenger and commercial vehicles with regards to criteria emissions, emissions of carbon dioxide and fuel consumption and/or the measurement of electric energy consumption and electric range (WLTP) [2021/2039] | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

UN Regulation No 154 – Uniform provisions concerning the approval of light duty passenger and commercial vehicles with regards to criteria emissions, emissions of carbon dioxide and fuel consumption and/or the measurement of electric energy consumption and electric range (WLTP) [2021/2039]

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# C_2019082EN.01001601.xml

| 4.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Trnave (Slovakia) lodged on 21 December 2018 — DHL Logistics (Slovakia), spol. s r.o. v Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky

(Case C-810/18)

(2019/C 82/17)

Language of the case: Slovak

Referring court

Krajský súd v Trnave

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: DHL Logistics (Slovakia), spol. s r.o.

Respondent: Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky

Question referred

Must the wording of Combined Nomenclature subheading 8525 80 91 set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1) of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff resulting from the Explanatory Notes published pursuant to that regulation in 2011 (2) (Commission Communication 2011/C 137/01) be interpreted as meaning that goods such as the digital video camera recorders at issue in the present case may also be classified under that subheading even though they are capable of capturing and recording video images only of a quality of less than 800 x 600 pixels, specifically, 720 x 576 pixels, given that their other function — the capturing and recording of still images — is limited to a still image quality of 1 600 x 1 200 pixels (1,92 megapixels)?

---

(1)  OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1.

(2)  OJ 2011 C 137, p. 1.

---
Opinion issued March 16, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-16-00078-CV

———————————

CELIA JOHNSON, Appellant

V.

CARLA CASILLAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1071118

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Celia Johnson appeals from a judgment in a forcible detainer case.1

 

1 This appeal was previously dismissed for failure to pay appellate fees and for the 

clerk’s record. After our dismissal, a clerk’s record was filed indicating Johnson 

was indigent. We granted Johnson’s motion for rehearing, withdrew our opinion 

and judgment, and reinstated the appeal, setting Johnson’s brief due thirty days after 

the reporter’s record was filed. 
2

Appellant’s brief was due on December 21, 2016. After being notified that this 

appeal was subject to dismissal on January 31, 2017, appellant did not respond to 

the motion and has not filed a brief or sought an extension. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd.
EXHIBIT 32.2


   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 8 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with Quarterly Report of Euro Group of Companies, Inc. (formerly
ICT Technologies, Inc.), a Delaware corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Chief Financial
Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



                                            /s/  Andrew Eracleous
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Andrew Eracleous
                                                 Chief Financial Officer


May 15, 2008
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 02, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, March 02, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15D0251. IN THE INTEREST OF: K. E. O., A CHILD (MOTHER) .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 1400254
#### Kamran AHMED, Petitioner v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. Attorney General, Respondent

No. 16-60775 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 21, 2017

Khagendra Gharti Chhetry, Esq., Counsel, Chhetry & Associates, P.C., New York, NY, for Petitioner.

Joanna Leigh Watson, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent

Before KING, ELROD, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Kamran Ahmed, a native and citizen of Bangladesh, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to reopen his removal proceedings. Ahmed contends that the BIA abused its discretion when it did not find that previously unavailable evidence of changed country conditions in Bangladesh justified relief. Specifically, Ahmed submitted evidence demonstrating that his family has been assaulted by members of the ruling political party. He explained that those party members had threatened to kill him and have now harmed his family because of his work for the opposition party. Ahmed contends that he cannot safely relocate within Bangladesh.

The fear of returning to Bangladesh that Ahmed faces due to new threats and violence experienced by his family members “amounts to a change in personal circumstances and does not constitute changed country conditions.” *Singh v. Lynch,*840 F.3d 220, 222-23 (5th Cir. 2016). Furthermore, Ahmed’s “briefing does not compare, in any meaningful way, the conditions” in Bangladesh at the time of his initial removal hearing and at the time he filed his *288motion to reopen. *Ramos-Lopez v. Lynch,*823 F.3d 1024, 1026 (5th Cir. 2016). The BIA’s decision was “not capricious, racially invidious, utterly without foundation in the evidence, or otherwise so irrational that it [was] arbitrary rather than the result of any perceptible rational approach”; accordingly, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. *Singh,*840 F.3d at 222 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

Although Ahmed disagrees with the BIA’s earlier decision affirming his removal order in which the BIA concluded that he can internally relocate to avoid harm, Ahmed did not petition for review of that decision. We therefore lack jurisdiction to review it. *See Kane v. Holder,*581 F.3d 231, 237-38 *&*n.14 (5th Cir. 2009).

The petition for review is DENIED in part and DISMISSED in part for lack of jurisdiction.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.