alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS            FARGO | Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-010 9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045

 

Tel:  410 884 2000

Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp. 

383 Madison Avenue 31st Floor,

New York, NY 10179

 

 

RE:  Annual Statement of Compliance

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator for the Columbus Square Portfolio Loan Combination (in such capacities, “Wells Fargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014  (the “reporting period”):

 

 

(a)     A review of Wells Fargo’s activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the “Servicing Agreement(s)”) has been made under my supervision; and

 

(b)     To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted on Schedule B.

 

 

 

March 19, 2015

 

 

/s/ Brain Smith

Brian Smith

Vice President

 

 

 

 

To: J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp. 

 

Schedule A

 

 

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

 

 

Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014, by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as Depositor , Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as General Master Servicer,  CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as General Special Servicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Master Servicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Special Servicer,  Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian,  Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor, relating to the series WFRBS 2014-C22 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates relating to the Columbus Square Portfolio Loan Combination, a  pari passu portion of which is included in the series JPM 2014-C24 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates transaction.

 

 

 

To:  J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp. 

Schedule B

 

 

Material Non-Compliance with Servicing Obligations

 

Not Applicable
#### Antywane Eric WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Judge COX; District Attorney Jacobs; Counselor Bobier; Pamela Smart, Defendants-Appellees

No. 17-30304

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed November 14, 2017

Antywane Eric Williams, Pro Se

Before SMITH, WIENER, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Antywane Eric Williams, Louisiana prisoner # 463325, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (IFP), filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint alleging that Judge Jeffrey S. Cox, Assistant District Attorney Charles Jacobs, and attorneys Kila Bobier and Pamela Smart violated his civil rights during his criminal trial. The district court dismissed the complaint with prejudice as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), and this court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. Williams returned to the district court and filed a motion for relief from judgment or order, which the district court denied. Williams noticed his appeal and moved for leave to proceed IFP on appeal. The district court denied the IFP motion and certified that the appeal was not taken in good faith. Williams now moves this court for authorization to proceed IFP.

We construe Williams’s motion as a challenge to the district court’s certification decision. *See Baugh v. Taylor,*117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). Our inquiry into whether the appeal is taken in good faith “is limited to whether the appeal involves legal points arguable on their merits (and therefore not frivolous).” *Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Williams has not shown that the district court erred in certifying that his appeal was not taken .in good faith, thus, we need not address the question of whether he *389qualifies financially. *See Baugh,*117 F.3d at 202. Accordingly, his IFP motion is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. *See Baugh,*117 F.3d at 202; 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

The dismissal of Williams’s § 1983 complaint as frivolous, and the dismissal of this appeal as frivolous each count as a strike pursuant to § 1915(g). *See Adepegba v. Hammons,*103 F.3d 383, 385-87 (5th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, Williams is WARNED that if he accumulates three strikes, he will not be able to proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. *See*§ 1915(g).

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellate case name: Anita Renfro v. Lauri Davis

Appellate case number: 01-21-00540-CV

Trial court case number: 2020-23367

Trial court: 215th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: August 17, 2022

Party filing motion: Appellee

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is denied.

Judge’s signature: __/s/ Julie Countiss______

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Countiss and Farris.

Date: October 27, 2022
1 OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY AND POLLUTION PREVENTION **UNITED ST AT**  **ES ENVIRONMENT AL**  **P ROTECTION A**  **GENCY**

WA SHINGTON, D.C. 20460

**CERTIFIED MAIL Return Receipt Requested**  Registrant Contact Name : Steven E. Rogosheske for Chem - Tech LTD. Address : 4515 Fleur Dr. #303 Address : Des Moines, IA 50321 Subject: Notice of Intent to Suspend, FIFRA Sections 3(c)(2)(B) and 4(g )(2)(B) . Dear Mr. Rogosheske : On

_______ , the Agency

issued a Notice of Intent to Suspend (NOITS) pursuant to FIFRA Section 3(c)(2)(B) affecting the following product: Dy- Fl y 1 Livestock Spray (EPA Reg. No. 47000 - 19). The basis for the Agency ’s action was set forth in the NOITS, which subsequentl y became a final and effective Suspension Order affecting the aforementioned product registration( s) and has remained a final and effective Suspension Order to date. If you have an y questions concerning this matter , please address them to Moana Appleyard at (703) 308 - 8175 . Sincerel y yours, Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., Director Pesticide Re - evaluation Division
# Official Journal C 181/14 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 181 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4714 July 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 181

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4714 July 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Acts adopted under Title VI of the Treaty on European Union |
| 2004/C 181/1 | Draft supplementary and amending budget 2004 (Additional posts for the increased counter terrorism activities) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

Acts adopted under Title VI of the Treaty on European Union

2004/C 181/1

Draft supplementary and amending budget 2004 (Additional posts for the increased counter terrorism activities)

1

---

| | I   Information |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 181/2 | Euro exchange rates | 3 |
| 2004/C 181/3 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3401 — DANISH CROWN/FLAGSHIP FOODS) (1) | 4 |
| 2004/C 181/4 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3432 — TOTAL LUBRIFIANTS/ENDEL/DAENERYS JV) (1) | 4 |
| 2004/C 181/5 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3490 — TPG/DLJ/CSFB/GROHE) (1) | 5 |

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 181/2

Euro exchange rates

3

2004/C 181/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3401 — DANISH CROWN/FLAGSHIP FOODS) (1)

4

2004/C 181/4

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3432 — TOTAL LUBRIFIANTS/ENDEL/DAENERYS JV) (1)

4

2004/C 181/5

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3490 — TPG/DLJ/CSFB/GROHE) (1)

5

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2004/C 181/6 | Notice | s3 |

2004/C 181/6

Notice

s3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 197 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

  1st Session
S. RES. 197

  To congratulate the Northwestern University Wildcats on winning the 
   1995 Big Ten Conference football championship and on receiving an 
      invitation to compete in the 1996 Rose Bowl, and to commend 
   Northwestern University for its pursuit of athletic and academic 
                              excellence.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 5, 1995

 Mr. Simon (for himself and Ms. Moseley-Braun) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  To congratulate the Northwestern University Wildcats on winning the 
   1995 Big Ten Conference football championship and on receiving an 
      invitation to compete in the 1996 Rose Bowl, and to commend 
   Northwestern University for its pursuit of athletic and academic 
                              excellence.

Whereas the Northwestern University Wildcats are the 1995 Big Ten Conference 
        football champions and have been invited to participate in the Rose Bowl 
        on January 1, 1996, in Pasadena, California;
Whereas the winning of the 1995 Big Ten Conference football championship by the 
        Wildcats completes an unprecedented 1-year turnaround of the 
        Northwestern University football program; and
Whereas Northwestern University is committed to athletic competitiveness without 
        diminution of scholastic standards: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) congratulates Northwestern University and its athletes, 
        coaches, faculty, students, administration, and alumni on the 
        winning of the 1995 Big Ten Conference football championship by 
        the Wildcats and on the receipt by the Wildcats of an 
        invitation to compete in the 1996 Rose Bowl; and
            (2) recognizes and commends Northwestern University for its 
        pursuit of athletic as well as academic excellence.
                                 <all>
```
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:**

__ 201 1 - NM -

___ 216

______ - AD **Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it ap propriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: REAPPOINTMENTS TO

INTERBRANCH COMMISSION FOR

GENDER, RACIAL AND ETHNIC

FAIRNESS 

:

:

:

:

NO. 455

JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION

DOCKET

 O R D E R

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 30th day of December, 2015, Lucille Marsh, Esquire, and Rhonda 

Hill Wilson, Esquire, Designees of the Supreme Court, are hereby reappointed as

members of the Interbranch Commission for Gender, Racial and Ethnic Fairness for a

term of two years commencing December 31, 2015. 

Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this 

matter.
# Official Journal C 124/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 124 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5725 April 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 124

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5725 April 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COURT OF AUDITORS |
| 2014/C 124/01 | Opinion No 3/2014 (pursuant to Article 287(4) TFEU) on the proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 215/2008 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the 10th European Development Fund for the implementation of the Bridging Facility | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COURT OF AUDITORS

2014/C 124/01

Opinion No 3/2014 (pursuant to Article 287(4) TFEU) on the proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 215/2008 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the 10th European Development Fund for the implementation of the Bridging Facility

(pursuant to Article 287(4) TFEU)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Jacqueline TEDDER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN LEATH CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent-Appellee, and Leath Correctional Institution, Respondent.

No. 17-7038

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 18, 2018

Decided: January 22, 2018

Jacqueline Tedder, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Attorney General, Sherrie Ann Butterbaugh, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jacqueline Tedder seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying as untimely her 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Tedder that failure to file timely, specific objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. *Wright v. Collins,*766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); *see also Thomas v. Arn,*474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). Tedder has waived appellate review by failing to file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, Topics in Alzheimer's Disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment and Cognitive Aging, March 25, 2022, 10:00 a.m. to March 25, 2022, 8:00 p.m., National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on March 03, 2022, FR Doc. 2022-04426, 87 FR 12182.                

This meeting is being amended to change the Contact Person from Maribeth Champoux to Heidi Friedman, Ph.D., Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD, 301-379-5623. The meeting is closed to the public.

March 15, 2022.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-05835 Filed 3-18-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 32

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ticketmaster Entertainment, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Irving Azoff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and Brian Regan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to our knowledge:



Date: November 14, 2008

/s/ IRVING AZOFF Irving Azoff Chief Executive OfficerDate: November 14, 2008

/s/ BRIAN REGAN Brian Regan Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
Converted by EDGARwiz
















This confirms the agreement entered into by and between NutraFuels, Inc., a Florida corporation (the “Company”) and Anthony Porcelli an individual hereinafter referred to as the “Service Provider”. The Company and the Service Provider are referred to as the Parties.




Whereas, the Service Provider performed services (the “Services”) for the Company as described below and agreed to provide the Services solely in exchange for shares of the Company’s common stock.

 

Now therefore, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants set forth herein, the parties agree and acknowledge the following: 

 

I. From January 2015 - January 2018, (the “Term”) the Service Provider will as new business development agent making new B2B introductions and facilitating other business opportunities for Company during the Term.




II. The Services were provided in a professional manner in good faith and in accordance with good industry practice.




III. The Service Provider performed the services as an independent contractor. The Company did not and was not required to make social security, workers’ compensation or unemployment insurance payments on behalf of the Service Provider.




IV. Service Provider is a resident of Florida. 




V. As full payment for the Services, the Service Provider accepts 400,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock.




VI. The Company acknowledges receipt of the Services during the Term and the Service Provider acknowledges full payment for the Services as set forth herein.




The Services will be completed on December 31st 2018 (the “Effective Date”). By signing below, the Parties agree and acknowledge the above terms are binding upon them as the Effective Date.  




NutraFuels, Inc.




/s/ Edgar Ward                                  

By: Edgar Ward, Chief Executive Officer




/s/ Anthony Porcelli                                  

Service Provider
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-50740

No. 08-50827

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

RUMALDO GALINDO-ARAUJO; 

CLEMENTE CAYETANO ARAGON-TARANGO,

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

No. 4:08-CR-70-5

Before SMITH, GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 4, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
Nos. 08-50740, 08-50827

2

Rumaldo Galindo-Araujo and Clemente Aragon-Tarango appeal the sentences imposed following their guilty plea convictions of aiding and abetting possession with the intent to distribute marihuana. They argue that the district

court erred in calculating their base offense levels because the court considered

the methamphetamine found in one of the five backpacks seized by Border Patrol agents. They contend that they had no knowledge of the methamphetamine

and no intent to possess it, so they cannot be held responsible for it. 

A defendant’s knowledge ofthe type of drug he is carrying is not necessary

for the drug to be used in the calculation of his sentence. United States v. Valencia-Gonzales, 172 F.3d 344, 345-46 (5th Cir. 1999); United States v. Gamez-Gonzalez, 319 F.3d 695, 700 (5th Cir. 2003). It is undisputed that defendants were

found with three other persons, all of whom were responsible for the five backpacks containing marihuana and methamphetamine. Therefore, consideration

of the methamphetamine in calculating the base offense levels was not clearly

erroneous. See United States v. Cisneros-Gutierrez, 517 F.3d 751, 764 (5th Cir.

2008). 

Accordingly, the judgments are AFFIRMED.
#### IN RE: Daquan T. WHITE, Petitioner.

No. 17-2282

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 18, 2018

Decided: January 22, 2018

Daquan T. White, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Daquan T. White has filed an original petition for a writ of habeas corpus, seeking release from jail and dismissal of an indictment issued in Wake County, North Carolina. This court ordinarily declines to entertain original habeas corpus petitions under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012), and this case presents no reason to depart from this practice. Moreover, we conclude that the interests of justice would not be served by transferring this case to the district court. *See*28 U.S.C. §§ 1631, 2241(b) (2012). Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the *202petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DISMISSED*