alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350
 (SECTION
906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of, Bluebird Exploration Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Peter Lawrence Wells, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer and Director of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:
March ___, 2008
 
 By:   
/s/ Peter Lawrence
Wells
 Peter
Lawrence Wells, President,
 Chief
Executive Officer,
 Chief
Financial Officer and Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          69,754
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  140,994
<ALLOWANCES>                                    70,000
<INVENTORY>                                     29,848
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               312,715
<PP&E>                                         752,045
<DEPRECIATION>                                 354,178
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 797,429
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          592,470
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,964
<OTHER-SE>                                     196,995
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   797,429
<SALES>                                        672,784
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,097,363
<CGS>                                          411,680
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,847,811
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,427,176
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,452
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (750,448)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (750,448)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)


</TABLE>
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 100

Relating to the future status of Taiwan after Hong Kong’s transfer to

the People’s Republic of China on July 1, 1997.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 18, 1997

Mr. DEUTSCH (for himself and Mr. CHABOT) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Relating to the future status of Taiwan after Hong Kong’s

transfer to the People’s Republic of China on July 1, 1997.

Whereas Hong Kong was acquired by the British in 1898

and leased from China for 99 years;

Whereas the treaty through which the Hong Kong territory

was leased from China expires on July 1, 1997, at which

time Hong Kong will be returned to the People’s Republic of China;

Whereas Beijing has vowed to implement the ‘‘one country,

two systems’’ formula on Hong Kong after its transfer;

and

Whereas no treaties between the People’s Republic of China

and Taiwan exist which determine the future status of
2

•HCON 100 IH

Taiwan and, unlike Hong Kong, Taiwan has been de

facto independent since 1949: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) the transfer of Hong Kong to the People’s

4 Republic of China does not alter the current and fu5 ture status of Taiwan as a free and de facto inde6 pendent country; and

7 (2) the future of Taiwan should be determined

8 by peaceful means through a democratic process in

9 accordance with the principle of self-determination,

10 as outlined in the Charter of the United Nations.

Æ
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1443/2005

of 5 September 2005         

amending Regulation (EC) No 1381/2005 as regards the quantity covered by the standing invitation to tender for the export of barley held by the French intervention agency

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 6 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1381/2005 is replaced by the following:

‘Article 2

The invitation to tender shall cover a maximum of 224 424 tonnes of barley for export to third countries with the exception of Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Liechtenstein, Mexico, Romania, Serbia and Montenegro (*1), Switzerland and the United States of America.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 September 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

(2)OJ L 191, 31.7.1993, p. 76. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 749/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 10).

(3)OJ L 220, 25.8.2005, p. 9.

----
# C_2013199EN.01001101.xml

| 11.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 199/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 199/11

---

Information communicated by the EFTA States regarding State aid granted under the Act referred to in point 1j of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation))

2013/C 199/08

PART I

| Aid No | GBER 7/13/EMP |
| --- | --- |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Granting authority | Name | The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration |
| Address | PO Box 5 |
| 0130 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Aid No

GBER 7/13/EMP

EFTA State

Norway

Granting authority

Name

The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration

Address

PO Box 5

0130 Oslo

NORWAY

Webpage

http://www.nav.no

Title of the aid measure

Tilskudd til teknisk tilrettelegging

(Grant to technical facilitation)

National legal basis (reference to the relevant national official publication)

Forskrift 11. desember 2008 nr. 1320 om arbeidsrettede tiltak mv.

(Reg. No 1320/2008)

Web link to the full text of the aid measure

http://www.lovdata.no/for/sf/ad/xd-20081211-1320.html#map017

Type of measure

Scheme

X

Duration

Scheme

Permanent scheme

Economic sector(s) concerned

All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

X

Type of beneficiary

SME

X

Large enterprises

X

Budget

Annual overall amount of the budget planned under the scheme

Approx. NOK 0,7 million

Aid instrument (Article 5)

Grant

X

PART II

| General objectives (list) | Objectives (list) | Maximum aid intensity in % or maximum aid amount in NOK | SME — bonuses in % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Aid for disadvantaged and disabled workers
  (Articles 40-42) | Aid for the recruitment of disadvantaged workers in the form of wage subsidies
  (Article 40) | Wage subsidies up to 50 %, for up to one year | |
| | Aid for the employment of disabled workers in the form of wage subsidies
  (Article 41) | Wage subsidies up to 60 %, for up to three years | |

General objectives (list)

Objectives (list)

Maximum aid intensity in % or maximum aid amount in NOK

SME — bonuses in %

Aid for disadvantaged and disabled workers

(Articles 40-42)

Aid for the recruitment of disadvantaged workers in the form of wage subsidies

(Article 40)

Wage subsidies up to 50 %, for up to one year

Aid for the employment of disabled workers in the form of wage subsidies

(Article 41)

Wage subsidies up to 60 %, for up to three years

---
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 186

Commending all who served with the United States Navy Asiatic Fleet

throughout the Far East from 1910 to 1942, especially those sailors

and marines who put their lives on the line for this Nation during

the earliest days of our involvement in World War II.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 7, 1997

Mr. BROWN of Ohio submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on National Security

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Commending all who served with the United States Navy

Asiatic Fleet throughout the Far East from 1910 to

1942, especially those sailors and marines who put their

lives on the line for this Nation during the earliest days

of our involvement in World War II.

Whereas the United States established the Asiatic Fleet of

the Navy in 1910 to protect American nationals, policies,

and possessions in the Far East;

Whereas the sailors and marines of the Asiatic Fleet came to

the aid of United States citizens and foreign nationals in

that region during the Chinese civil war, the Yangtze

Flood of 1931, and the outbreak of Sino-Japanese

hostilities;
2

•HCON 186 IH

Whereas in 1940, due to deteriorating political relations and

increasing tensions between the United States and

Japan, a reinforced Asiatic Fleet began concentrating on

the defense of the Philippines and engaged in extensive

training to ensure maximum operational readiness for

any eventuality;

Whereas following the declaration of war against Japan, the

warships, submarines, and aircraft of the Asiatic Fleet

singly or in task forces courageously fought many naval

battles against a superior Japanese armada;

Whereas the Asiatic Fleet directly suffered the loss of 22

ships, 1,826 men killed or missing in action, and 518

men captured, many of whom did not survive their internment; and

Whereas the Asiatic Fleet ceased to exist as a cohesive fighting force on March 1, 1942, when its flagship, the U.S.S.

HOUSTON, was sunk by the Japanese near Indonesia:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) the Congress commends the bravery and re4 sourcefulness of all who served in the United States

5 Navy Asiatic Fleet from 1910 to 1942, especially

6 those sailors and marines who put their lives in

7 harm’s way during the first few months of America’s

8 participation in World War II; and

9 (2) the American people should always remem10 ber the courage and determination displayed by the
3

•HCON 186 IH

1 personnel of the Asiatic Fleet, honoring the sac2 rifices they made in defense of the United States.

Æ
----

----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Date:       May 15, 2009 |  By:  |  /s/  Steven M.      Waszak       |
|-------------------------------------|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                                |            | Steven M.      WaszakChief FinancialOfficer |

----
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 97

Expressing the sense of the Senate with respect to peace and stability in

the South China Sea.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 30 (legislative day, MARCH 27), 1995

Mr. THOMAS (for himself and Mr. ROBB) submitted the following resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate with respect to peace

and stability in the South China Sea.

Whereas the South China Sea is a strategically important waterway through which transits approximately 25 percent

of the World’s ocean freight, including almost 70 percent

of Japan’s oil supply;

Whereas the South China Sea serves as a crucial sea lane for

naval vessels of the United States and other countries,

especially in times of emergency;

Whereas the People’s Republic of China, the Republic of the

Philippines, the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, the Republic of China on Taiwan, the State of Brunei

Darussalam, and Malaysia have overlapping and mutually

exclusive claims to portions of the South China Sea, especially in the Spratly Island group;
2

•SRES 97 IS

Whereas these competing claims have led to armed conflicts

between several of the claimants;

Whereas these conflicts threaten the peace and stability of all

of East Asia; and

Whereas the 1992 Manila Declaration of the Association of

South East Asian Nations, also recognized by the Socialist Republic of Vietnam and the People’s Republic of

China, calls on the claimants to exercise restraint and

seek a peaceful negotiated solution to the conflicts: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) urges the executive branch to reiterate to

3 the claimants in the South China Sea that the Unit4 ed States does not take a position on any individual

5 claim;

6 (2) calls upon all of the claimants to refrain

7 from using military force to assert or expand terri8 torial claims in the South China Sea;

9 (3) urges the executive branch to declare the

10 active support of the United States for the 1992

11 Manila Declaration of the Association of South East

12 Asian Nations, and calls upon all the claimants to

13 observe faithfully its provisions; and

14 (4) calls upon the claimants to scrupulously ob15 serve the January, 1995 status quo ante pending
3

•SRES 97 IS

1 any negotiations or resolution of the conflicts be2 tween such claimants over such claims.

Æ
Request for Information James Welsh (FAA-2015-1663) 

9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) 

Dear Mr. Welsh: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. 

FAA−2015−1663). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition.

 Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e., fixed-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the 

proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including payload). This 

information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your 

information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary 

information), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by November 30, 

2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999 .

 

FAA Office of Rulemaking 

Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 10:38 AM 

To: JAMES.WELSH@CBMOVES.COM
#### Dartagnan Shalil SIMMONS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-7214

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 21, 2017

Decided: December 28, 2017

*196Dartagnan Shalil Simmons, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Andrew Witmer, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Rosemary Virginia Bourne, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dartagnan Shalil Simmons seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling -is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Simmons has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned, Robert S. Herlin, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of Evolution Petroleum Corporation (the “Company”), certifiesin connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission ofthe Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,2007 (the “Report”) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed thiscertification as of the 15th day of May, 2007.
|        | /s/ ROBERT S. HERLIN    |   |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|--------|
|   | Robert S. Herlin        |   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Evolution Petroleum Corporation and will beretained by Evolution Petroleum Corporation and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certificate is being furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission as an exhibit to this Form 10-QSB and shall not beconsidered filed as part of the Form 10-QSB.

1

----
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6352 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for one year the 

above-the-line deduction for qualified tuition and related expenses. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2016 

Mr. GRAYSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

for one year the above-the-line deduction for qualified 

tuition and related expenses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ABOVE-THE-LINE DEDUCTION 

4 FOR QUALIFIED TUITION AND RELATED EX5 PENSES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (e) of section 222 of 

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

8 ‘‘December 31, 2016’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 

9 2017’’. 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6352 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2016. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
# Official Journal C 130/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 130 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5729 April 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 130

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5729 April 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 130/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7197 — AMP/Arcus/PSP/Alpha) (1) | 1 |
| 2014/C 130/02 | Notice to importers — Imports of high-content sugar products | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 130/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7197 — AMP/Arcus/PSP/Alpha) (1)

1

2014/C 130/02

Notice to importers — Imports of high-content sugar products

2

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2014/C 130/03 | Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as implemented by Council Implementing Decision 2014/238/CFSP, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 433/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine | 3 |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 130/04 | Euro exchange rates | 4 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2014/C 130/03

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as implemented by Council Implementing Decision 2014/238/CFSP, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 433/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

3

European Commission

2014/C 130/04

Euro exchange rates

4

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 130/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7174 — Federal-Mogul Corporation/Honeywell Friction Materials) (1) | 5 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2014/C 130/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7174 — Federal-Mogul Corporation/Honeywell Friction Materials) (1)

5

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN