alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 275 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 275

       To express the sense of the Senate concerning Afghanistan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 28, 1996

Mr. Brown submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       To express the sense of the Senate concerning Afghanistan.

Whereas, prior to 1979, Afghanistan was a peaceful, united country;
Whereas the successful fight of brave men and women of Afghanistan resisting the 
        Soviet invasion and occupation of 1979-1989 was a significant element in 
        the dissolution of the Soviet empire;
Whereas the dissolution of the Soviet empire brought freedom to the nations of 
        central and eastern Europe as well as to the nations of central Asia;
Whereas although many years after the Soviet Union withdrawal, Afghanistan does 
        not enjoy the peace it has earned;
Whereas the United Nations can play a unique and important role in bringing an 
        end to the conflict in Afghanistan; and
Whereas recent meetings between Members of Congress and the representatives of 
        the major Afghan factions indicate a significant desire on the part of 
        all parties to achieve a peaceful resolution to the conflict in 
        Afghanistan and the establishment of an effective government that 
        represents the interests of the Afghan people: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that--
            (1) the courageous people of Afghanistan have earned the 
        world's respect and support for their epic struggle against the 
        forces of communism;
            (2) resolving the continuing conflict in Afghanistan and 
        alleviating the accompanying humanitarian distress of the 
        Afghan people should be a top priority of the United States;
            (3) outside interference and the provision of arms and 
        military supplies to the warring parties should be halted;
            (4) a unique moment in Afghan civil war exists where all 
        major factions are searching for a peaceful solution to the 
        conflict;
            (5) the United States should urge the United Nations to 
        move quickly to appoint a special envoy to Afghanistan who will 
        act aggressively to assist the Afghans to achieve a solution to 
        the conflict acceptable to the Afghan people; and
            (6) the United Nations should work to create the conditions 
        for a continuing dialogue among the Afghan factions.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 38 (Friday, February 25, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10790-10791]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04053]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12

[[Page 10791]]

CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The 
factors that are considered in acting on the applications are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than March 14, 2022.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Jeffrey Imgarten, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Harold Guyon (``Guy'') Townsend III, as co-trustee of the SRT 
2015 LFG Trust, both of Kansas City, Missouri; to join the Rowland 
Family Group, a group acting in concert, to acquire voting shares of 
Lead Financial Group, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting 
shares of Lead Bank, both of Kansas City, Missouri. The Federal Reserve 
previously approved Sarah F. Rowland to serve as co-trustee of the 
Trust.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 22, 
2022.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-04053 Filed 2-24-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Powerhouse Technologies Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Jay Elliot, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.



/s/ Jay Elliot
-------------------------------------------------
Jay Elliot
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Date: March 12, 2004
#### Antwan BENTHALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Megan SMITH, Pretrial Case Manager, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-7277

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 18, 2018

Decided: January 23, 2018

Antwan Benthall, Appellant Pro Se.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*227PER CURIAM:

Antwan Benthall appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Benthall’s motion to amend the ease caption and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Benthall v. Smith,*No. 1:17-cv-00959-TSE-TCB (E.D. Va. Sept. 1, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-85,952-04

EX P ARTE BRENT JUS TICE, App licant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1385768-C IN THE 176 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant was convicted of crue lty to non-livestock animals and sentenc ed to twenty y ear s’ imprisonment. The Four

teenth Court of Appea ls aff irmed his conviction. Justice v. State , No. 14- 18-00462-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [14 Dist.] Ap r. 9 , 2 020) (not desig nated for publication). t h Applicant filed this application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk f

orwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant conte nds, among other things, that trial and appellate counsel wer e inef fec tive. Applicant has a lleg ed fa cts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. W ashington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Additionally , this Court’s independe nt revie w of the habea s corpus rec ord reve als that based on Applicant’s date of offe nse, the enhanc ement provision under which he was sentenc ed2

could be inapplica

ble to this case, r esulting in a potentially

illega l sentence

. Acc ording ly , the rec ord should be develo p ed

. The trial court is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fact. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall o rder counsel to respond to A

pplicant’s claims. I n developing the rec ord, the trial court may use any means set out in Arti cl e 11.07, § 3(d). I f the trial court elec ts to hold a hear ing, it shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wants to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to repr esent him at the hear ing. S ee T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. I f counsel is appointed or reta ined, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s

name. The trial court shall make finding s o f fa ct and conclusions of law as to whether trial and ap p ell ate counsel wer e defic ient and whether Applicant was prejudice d. The trial court shal l al s o make specific finding s and conclusions deter mining whether Applicant’s sentenc e is within the applicable punishment range , g iven the date of his offe nse and any prior convictions that wer e available for enhanc ement. The trial court may make any other findings an d co n clusions that it deems a ppropriate in response to Applica nt’s claims. The trial cour t s hall make findings of fac t and conclusions of l aw within ninety day s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, af fidavits, motions, objections, proposed finding s and conclusions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.3

Filed: Mar ch 10, 2021 Do not publish
#### Tori Keon THOMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The State of SOUTH CAROLINA; Department of Social Services, Child Support Division, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-2264

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 18, 2018

Decided: January 22, 2018

Tori Keon Thompson, Appellant Pro Se.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tori Keon Thompson seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint as barred by the Eleventh Amendment. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” *Bowles v. Russell,*551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on September 20, 2017. The notice of appeal was filed on October 27, 2017. Because Thompson failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
EXHIBIT 13.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 Partnership Form 20-F
 (1)
    
    The Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 Dated: April 11, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Peter EvensenPeter EvensenChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 144

Expressing the sense of the Congress that former Secretary General of the

United Nations Kurt Waldheim should not receive a retirement allowance

from the United Nations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 4, 1997

Mrs. MALONEY of New York (for herself, Mr. HORN, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. WATTS of Oklahoma, Ms. DUNN, Ms. WOOLSEY, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. GIBBONS, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. DELAHUNT, and

Mr. GUTIERREZ) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that former Secretary

General of the United Nations Kurt Waldheim should

not receive a retirement allowance from the United Nations.

Whereas former Secretary General of the United Nations

Kurt Waldheim currently receives an annual pension of

$102,000 from that body;

Whereas in 1986 Waldheim was exposed for his collaboration

in the Nazi extermination campaign in southern Europe

during World War II and he was barred from the United

States;
2

•HCON 144 IH

Whereas Waldheim is a known Nazi war criminal who obtained his position at the United Nations under false pretenses;

Whereas because of this, the United Nations should no longer

be obligated to fund a retirement allowance for Kurt

Waldheim: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 President should instruct the Permanent Representative

4 of the United States to the United Nations to act to

5 amend the 1998–99 Regular Program Budget of the

6 United Nations to eliminate funding of Kurt Waldheim’s

7 retirement allowance and to act to deny Kurt Waldheim

8 a retirement allowance in all future budgets of the United

9 Nations.

Æ
V 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 809 

For the relief of Ibrahim Parlak. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2015 

Mr. UPTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Ibrahim Parlak. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR IBRAHIM 

4 PARLAK. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Ibrahim Parlak shall be eligible for 

8 issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 

9 to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi10 dence upon filing an application for issuance of an immi11 grant visa under section 204 of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) 

12 or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 809 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Ibrahim Parlak 

2 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci3 fied in subsection (c), Ibrahim Parlak shall be considered 

4 to have entered and remained lawfully and shall be eligible 

5 for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immi6 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as of the date 

7 of enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Ibrahim Parlak, the Secretary of State shall in16 struct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current 

17 or next following fiscal year, the total number of immi18 grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun19 try of birth of Ibrahim Parlak under section 203(a) of the 

20 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)) or, 

21 if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are 

22 made available to natives of the country of birth of 

23 Ibrahim Parlak under section 202(e) of that Act (8 U.S.C. 

24 1152(e)). 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 809 IH

1 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

2 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 

3 parents, brothers, and sisters of Ibrahim Parlak shall not, 

4 by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, privi5 lege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1
**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**
     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Party City Corporation(the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
(i)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly periodended December 27, 2003 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and
(ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ NANCY PEDOT    Nancy Pedot  *Chief Executive Officer* 
Dated: February 10, 2004
     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany theReport pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made beforeor after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing.
29
# EUR-Lex - 32003R1245 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32003R1245

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1245/2003 of 11 July 2003 determining the groups of high-quality varieties exempt from application of the quota buyback programme in raw tobacco for the 2003 harvest **

*
Official Journal L 174 , 12/07/2003 P. 0003 - 0003 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1245/2003

of 11 July 2003

determining the groups of high-quality varieties exempt from application of the quota buyback programme in raw tobacco for the 2003 harvest

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 of 30 June 1992 on the common organisation of the market in raw tobacco(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 806/2003(2), and in particular Article 14a, sixth indent, thereof,

Whereas:

(1) According to Article 34(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2848/98 of 22 December 1998 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 as regards the premium scheme, production quotas and the specific aid to be granted to producer groups in the raw tobacco sector(3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1983/2002(4), the Commission shall determine, on the basis of proposals from the Member States, which sensitive production areas and/or groups of high-quality varieties of each Member State's guarantee threshold are to be exempt from application of the quota buyback programme.

(2) Some Member States have requested a number of high-quality varieties to be exempted from quota buyback for the 2003 harvest. These groups of high-quality varieties should therefore be determined for the 2003 harvest.

(3) As Regulation (EC) No 2848/98 requires Member States to make public their intention to sell from 1 November, this Regulation should apply from 1 November 2003.

(4) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Tobacco,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The quantities of groups of high-quality varieties exempt from quota buyback programme for the 2003 harvest are as follows:

(a) in Greece:

>TABLE>

(b) in France:

>TABLE>

(c) in Portugal:

>TABLE>

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 1 November 2003.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 July 2003.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 215, 30.7.1992, p. 70.

(2) OJ L 122, 16.5.2003, p. 1.

(3) OJ L 358, 31.12.1998, p. 17.

(4) OJ L 306, 8.11.2002, p. 8.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.9

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of QualMark Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles
D. Johnston, President & Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.



/s/ Charles D. Johnston
------------------------------------
Charles D. Johnston
President & Chief Executive Officer

May 14, 2003


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


In connection with the Quarterly Report of QualMark Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony
A. Scalese Chief Financial Officer & Principal Accounting Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.

/s/ Anthony A. Scalese
------------------------------------
Anthony A. Scalese
Chief Financial Officer & Principal Accounting Officer

May 14, 2003

A signed original of these written statements required by section 906 have been
provided to QualMark Corporation and will be retained by QualMark Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.