### 1 DATE: March 6 , 2013

SUBJECT: Section 112(d)(6) Technology Review for Wool Fiberglass NESHAP EPA Contract No. EP

- D

- 11

- 084 ; EPA Work Assignment No. 1

- 0 7 RTI Project No. 021 3199 .00 1 .0 07

FROM: Cindy Hancy Dave Reeves

TO: Susan Fairchild , EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MMG

The purpose of this memorandum is to present the results of a review on developments in practices, processes, and control technologies that apply to wool fiberglass manufacturing , and specifically to sources subject to the national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for Wool Fiberglass Production (40 CFR 63, subpart NNN ) . This analysis is part of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s ( EPA’s ) review efforts in accordance with section 112(d)(6) of the Clean Air Act (CAA)

. Section I of this memorandum provides background information on the requirements of section 112(d)(6) of the CAA , the wool fiberglass source category, and the requirements of the Wool Fiberglass NESHAP . Section II discusses the review of information on developments in practices, processes, and control technologies that have occurred since the original development of this NESHAP

. Section III summarize s the technology review fi ndings, and references are provided in Section IV.

I. Background/Purpose

A. Requirements of Section 112(d)(6) of the CAA

Section 112 of the CAA require s t he EPA to establish technology

- based standards for source s of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) . These t echnology

- based standards are often referred to as maximum achievable control technology, or MACT, standards. Section 112 also contains provisions requiring t he EPA to revisit these standards. Specifically, paragraph 112(d)(6) section states:

(6) REVIEW AND REVISION.

– The Administrator shall review, and revise as necessary (taking into account developments in practices, processes, and control technologies), emission standards promulgated under this section no less often than every 8 years.

For the purpo se of this technology review , a “development” was considered to be any of the following :

• A ny a dd

- on control technology or other equipment that was not identified and considered during the development of the NESHAP;

• Any i mprovements in add

- on control tech nology or other equipment that w ere not identified and considered during NESHAP development that could result in significan t additional HAP emissions reductions;

### 2 • Any w ork practice or operational procedure that was not identified and considered during NESHA P development ; and

• Any p rocess change or pollution prevention alternative that could be broadly applied that was not identified and considered during the development of the NESHAP.

B. Description of Source Category and NESHAP Requirement s 1



### Wool fiberglass manufacturing is the high

- temperature conversion of various raw materials into a homogeneous melt, followed by the fabrication of this melt into glass fibers. Wool fiberglass p roduction can be segmented into three phases: raw materials handling, glass

- melting , and wool glass fiber forming and finishing. The primary component of glass fiber is sand, but it also includes varying quantities of feldspar, sodium sulfate, anhydrous borax, boric acid, and many other mate rials. In the glass

- melting furnace, the raw materials are heated to a high temperature and are transformed through a sequence of chemical reactions to molten glass. Although there are many furnace designs, furnaces are generally large, shallow, and well

- i nsulated vessels that are heated from above. In operation, raw materials are introduced continuously on top of a bed of molten glass, where they slowly mix and dissolve. Mixing is effected by natural convection, gases rising from chemical reactions, and, i n some operations, by air or oxygen injection into the bottom of the bed. Oxygen is also used as a fuel and replaces air at some furnaces.

Glass

- melting furnaces vary in fuel source and method of heat application into four types: recuperative, regenerati ve, unit, and electric melter. The recuperative, regenerative, and unit melter furnaces can be fueled by either gas or oil and may supplement those fuels with oxygen

. Recuperative furnaces use a steel heat exchanger, recovering heat from the exhaust gases by exchange with the combustion air. Regenerative furnaces use a lattice of brickwork to recover waste heat from exhaust gases. Electric furnaces melt glass by passing an electric current through the melt. Electric furnaces are either hot

- top or cold

- top. The former use gas for auxiliary heating and the latter use only the electric current

. Unit melters are used only for the "indirect" marble melting process

. Wool fiberglass is generally produced for insulation and is formed in to mats that are cut into bat ts; however, some facilities produce loose wool and other specialty products. During the formation of fibers into a wool fiberglass mat (th e process known as "forming" in the industry), glass fibers are made from molten glass and if the product is “bonded” , a chemical binder is simultaneously sprayed on the fibers as they are created. Historically, t he binder wa s a thermosetting resin that hol ds the glass fibers together. Although the binder composition varies with pro duct type, typically the binder consists of a solution of phenol

- formaldehyde resin, water, ur ea, lignin, silane, and ammonia . H owever many facilities have begun to use phenol

formaldehyde free resins , some of which do not require heat for curing in a thermosetting process

. Two method s of creating fibers are used by the industry ; rotary spin (RS) and flame attenuation

. (FA). In the RS process, centri fugal force causes molten glass to flow through small holes in the wall of a rapidly rotating cylinder t o create fibers that are broken in to s trands in an air stream. In the FA process, molten glass flows by gravity from the furnace through numerous small orifices to create threads that are then attenuated (stretched to the point of breaking) by high velocity hot

### 3 air and/or a flame. After th e glass fibers are created (by either process) and sprayed with the binder solution (if bonded) , they are collected by gravity on a conv eyor belt in the form of a mat. If a thermoset bonded product is being produced, t he conveyor carries the newly formed w ool fiberglass through a large oven to cure the thermosetting binder and then through a cooling section where ambient air is drawn down through the mat. The wool fiberglass is then cooled before trimming. This curing process is not performe d if the product is not bonded or if the resin is not one requiring the thermosetting process . A summary of emission units regulated under the

s ubpart N N N for wool fiberglass facilities is included in Table 1.

Table 1. Summary of Wool Fiberglass Production Emission Units

Emission Unit Description HAP Emitted Glass

- Melting Furnace F urnace where raw material is melted. M etals , HF, HCl

RS Lines RS lines that produce bonded building insulation products (includes forming, curing, and collection processes). F ormaldehyde, methanol , and phenol ( from bonded products that use Phenol/ Formaldehyde Binder ) FA Lines FA lines that produce bonded pipe insulation and heavy density products (includes forming, curing, and collection processes).

The current Wool Fiberglass NESHAP was promulgated on June 1 4 , 1999 and applies to new and existing glass

- melting furnaces, each new and existing FA manufacturing line producing a bonded pipe product or a bonded heavy density product, and each new and existing RS manufactu ring line producing a bonded wool fiberglass building insulation product. II. Practices, Processes, and Control Technologies for Wool Fiberglass Production

T o determine developments in practices, processes, and control technology, the following were examined: control technologies considered during NESHAP development and any associated advances ( S ection II. A and Section II.B ) , direct correspondence with the indu stry ( S ection II.C), and the internet and t he EPA’s RACT/BACT/LAER Clearinghouse ( S ection II. D).

A. Control Technologies Considered for NESHAP

For the purpose of this exercise, a “development” was considered to be:

• Any add

- on control technology or other equipment (e.g., floating roofs for storage tanks) that was not identified and considered during MACT development,

• Any improvements in add

- on control technology or other equipment (that was identified and considered during MACT development) that could res ult in significant additional emission reduction,

• Any work practice or operational procedure that was not identified and considered during MACT development, and

• Any pollution prevention alternative that could be broadly applied that was not identified and considered during MACT development.

### 4 • Any process change that could be broadly applied that was not identified and considered during MACT development.

Table 2 summarizes the practices, processes, and control technologies considered during the development of the MACT standard.

Table 2 . Summary of Practices, Processes, and Control Technologies Identified and Considered During Wool Fiberglass Production MACT Development 2



### Emission Source Practices, Processes, and Control Technologies Furnaces Fabric filter, dry and wet ESP, batch wetting Bonded Manufacturing lines ( RS/FA ) Wet ESP, scru bber, forming air recirculation , mist eliminator, water over spray, HVAF, incineration, special binder formulations

B. Technology Developments Since Promulgation of NESHAP 4 ,5



### Since the NESHAP was developed in the 1990’s , the methods for controlling emissions from furnaces and bonded lines are the same, but some technologies have developed that can affect the emissions of wool fiberglass production.

Technology Developments in Bonded Lines D evelopments in binder formulations have occurred allowing s everal facilities that produce bonded products to replace phenol

- formaldehyde binder (which required thermosetting) with a

non

- HAP binder that does not emit HAP and may not requir e thermosetting. This development has converted about two

- thirds of the bonded lines in the source category and has allowed sources which were once major sources to now emit HAP in amounts below the major source threshold.

Technology Developments in Furna ces The EPA evaluated chromium and PM emissions data from two information requests, several meeti ngs with wool fiberglass industry representatives, and reference materials in the analysis of technological developments in the industry. The dataset for this source category includes over 40 furnaces and analyzed the operational differences of the different types of glass

- melting furnaces.

Electric furnaces do not emit chromium at the levels of gas

- fired furnaces, and chromium emissions from electric furnaces are about 2 orders of magnitude lower than the chromium emissions from gas

- fired furnaces. PM emissions from electric furnaces are also low due to baghouse and non cold

- top electric furnaces and batch wetting of the crust above the molten glass in cold top furnace s . These designs are not new and were also used at many wool fiberglass manufacturing facilities at development of the 1999 MACT standard.

Oxy

- fuel furnaces have replaced all but three air gas furnaces and are expected to replace the remaining air gas furnaces over the next 10 years due to overall economic and production advantages. Oxy

- fuel furnaces are fired using industrial

- grade oxygen and natural gas to heat the

### 5 furnace. They operate with higher temperatures above the melted glass (inside t he furnace) than air gas furnaces due to the high temperature of oxygen combustion. This also results in low PM and NOx emissions because there are no excess gases in the furnace (as is the case for air

- gas furnaces).

The reason for the higher emission potential for gas

- fired glass

- melting furnaces is due to differences in design and operation of gas

- fired glass

- melting furnaces compared to electric glass

- melting furnaces. A chromium refractory product has the greatest resistance to heat and wear of any refractory in use today. The temperatures above the melt in gas

- fired glass

- melting furnaces range from 2500 ◦ 

### to 4500 ◦ 

### F, while the temperatures in electric glass

- melting furnaces are a few hundred degrees. Due to their higher operating temperatures, gas

- fi red glass

- melting furnaces are constructed using chromium refractories at various parts of the glass

- melting furnace that are above the molten glass, including the crown. The presence of chromium above the glass melt line, high temperatures, and corrosive environment are what cause gas

- fired furnace to have a higher chromium emission potential. In addition the high temperatures result in more of the chromium being converted to its hexavalent state compared to electric furnaces.

Since the November 25, 2011, proposal, EPA has learned that, if a source of reasonably priced oxygen is available, the oxy

- fuel glass

- melting furnace is the design favored for use by glass manufacturers due to the glass

- melting furnace’s low NOx emissions (NOx is an ozone precursor), and low energy demands per volume output of glass. The low NOx emissions of an oxy

- fuel glass

- melting furnace result from the fact that no air (which contains nitrogen) is introduced into the high temperature zone above the glass melt. Instead, the oxy

- fu el glass

melting furnace design mixes the natural gas fuel with pure oxygen for combustion, thus reducing NOx emissions.

The DOE’s office of Industrial Technology, in association with industry experts from the glass manufacturing, refractory production s ectors and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, conducted studies to determine ways to optimize energy uses, needs and efficiencies in industrial sectors. In these studies, industry experts agreed that oxy

- fuel glass

- melting furnaces will ultimately replace air gas glass

- melting furnaces by 2020 due to these economic and environmental factors. 6 

### For example, industry experts participating in the Industrial Technologies Program (ITP), under the Department of Energ y’s Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy program, described the demands an oxy

- fuel glass

- melting furnace places upon the refractory lining: “The ITP has recognized that a reduction in overall domestic energy consumption will occur if the primary energy

- consuming industries improve their own energy efficiencies. Recognizing this need, the glass industry is currently converting older, conventional air

- fuel

- fired furnaces to oxy

- fuel firing, or in the case of new construction, is building new oxy

- fuel

- fired furnaces instead. This has caused oxy

- fuel technology to become one of the fastest growing technologies in the glass industry because it promises pollution abatement, increased glass

- pull effectiveness, capital cost savings, and increased energy efficienc y. For example, a recent study has shown that approximately $202M in energy savings per year in 2005 and a $445M per year savings by 2020 could be expected with the conversion of air/fuel to oxy

- fuel

– fired glass manufacturing furnaces. These results, which reflect energy savings of 2.8 and 14.2 TBtu/year, respectively, are based on the projection that 61 percent and 100 percent furnace conversions will occur by the years 2005 and 2020, respectively.”

### 6 Other studies indicate that, under normal industrial te mperatures and oxidizing conditions, trivalent chromium, which is present in the refractory, can oxidize to hexavalent chromium. 7 

### It was found that uncombined and available oxides were responsible for a higher yield of hexavalent chromium. Consequently, an increasing concentration of oxides in the oxy

- fuel glass

melting furnace environment increases the formation of chromium from the trivalent state to hexavalent state. The condition of high oxides in the oxy

- fuel glass

- melting furnace environment is one ch aracteristic of the highest emitting glass

- melting furnace

. 8



### Moreover, while the degradation of the glass

- melting furnace refractory indicates increasing chromium emissions, that process does not necessarily follow a normal and predictable pattern. The d egradation of refractories within the glass

- melting furnace is a function of numerous factors, including temperature, time, stress, and the composite effects of aging and creep response. These processes are highly nonlinear, so the traditional equations th at assume steady

state deformation rates are not appropriate

. 9



### Although all glass

- melting furnaces are constructed using chromium refractories at and below the line of contact defined by the refractory wall and the molten glass within the glass

- melting furnace (the glass/metal line), oxy

- fuel and some air gas glass

- me lting furnaces have other glass

melting furnace parts constructed using chromium refractories, such as the crown and forehearth. The use of chromium refractories above the melt line is necessary to obtain the desired furnace life and reduce the necessity f or hot repairs of the furnace. When the hot, corrosive and reactive gases of a gas

- fired glass

- melting furnace come in contact with the high chromium refractories lining the area above the glass melt in high temperature glass

- melting furnaces, the chromium is available to be oxidized and converted into its hexavalent form.

The cost of rebuilding a wool fiberglass glass

- melting furnace ranges from 10

- 12 million dollars; most of this cost is the cost of skilled labor

. 10 

### While chromium refractories are more expensive than conventional refractories, they are only incrementally so

. 9 

### When conventional (high alumina/silica) refractories are used, the useful life of the glass

- melting furnace is about seven years. Chromium refractories almost double the useful life of the glass

- melting furnace. Therefore, industry has a strong economic incentive to develop and use longer lasting refractories in construction of the glass

- melting furnaces. Industry spokespersons have indicated that they rely on using chromium refracto ries offering longer glass

- melting furnace life, and have commented that the EPA should regulate the chromium emissions from wool fiberglass glass

melting furnaces rather than regulate chromium content of refractories. 11



### We have also found that as the re fractories of the gas

- fired glass

- melting furnaces degrade, the chromium of those refractories at and above the metal/glass line is emitted as particulate to the outside air. Chromium from the refractories below the metal/glass line is absorbed into the

mo lten glass and becomes vitrified with the other raw minerals. Industry commented that refractory loss from degradation of the refractory walls in use is approximately 20,000 pounds of refractory annually

. 12 

### However, much of the loss occurs below the glass melt line. The chromium released below the glass melt line is believed to stay in the glass.

### 7 The facility with the highest emitting glass

- melting furnace (an oxy

- fuel glass

- melting furnace) submitted chro mium testing for state inventory reporting purposes over a seven

- year period. As shown in Table 3 below, those test results are extrapolated using permitted production rates to calculate approximate annual emissions of chromium compounds. The calculations show that in 2004, chromium emissions are estimated to be less than five pounds annually. Repeated chromium emissions testing for the State reports in 2005 and 2008 and permitted production rates for those years show chromium emissions increased to 540 pou nds per year for the same glass

- melting furnace. Emissions testing conducted in 2010 speciating chromium by its compounds show that 93 percent of the chromium was in the hexavalent state.

Table 3. Summary of Chromium Emissions from 2004

– 2010

Year Glass

- melting furnace Chromium Emissions at permitted production rate, pounds per year

2004 <5 2005 30 2008 114 2010 540

This glass

- melting furnace was not reconstructed during this seven

- year period covered by the chromium testing. This indicates that a degradation of the chromium refractory resulted in a significant increase in chromium emissions during this period. Though we have not identified other glass

- melting furnaces that have seen this type of significant chromium emissions increase, we believe that this high emitting glass

- melting furnace clearly demonstrates a potential for increased chromium emissions for glass

- m elting furnaces where the chromium containing refractory is exposed to high temperatures. While this glass

- melting furnace is located at a major source, we note, as we discussed in the proposed RTR rule, that there is no difference in a glass

melting furna ce at a major source and the same design glass

- melting furnace at an area source facility.

The thermal, physical and chemical properties of molten wool fiberglass cause corrosion and erosion to the refractory lining of the glass

- melting furnace, and the glass

- melting furnace must be constructed of materials capable of resisting this environment. Because oxygen burns very hot, some of the highest refractory performance requirements in the industry are placed upon wool fiberglass oxy

- fuel glass

- melting furn aces

. 13 

### Consequently, an oxy

- fuel glass

- melting furnace used to produce wool fiberglass must be constructed of chromium refractories because these are the only types of materials currently available that are suitable for this use and meet the rigorous prac tical demands of wool fiberglass manufacturing. The industry has commented that the use of chromium refractories is economically essential to wool fiberglass manufacturing, because of normal high thermal and chemical stressors to oxy

- fuel glass

- melting fur naces, chromium refractories are preferred by industry for economical and safe oxy

- fuel glass

- melting furnace operation. Construction using these materials significantly increases the life of the glass

melting furnace

. 9, 11

### 8 During discussions with industry (meetings and site visits) we found that wool fiberglass companies review a number of options at their disposal when determining how to best meet environmental goals. Companies include in these decisions whether it is more cost effective to rebuild a furnace near the end of it’s useful life, to extend the life of the furnace using ‘hot’ repairs 1 

### both above and below the melt line, and what types of materials to use for either a rebuilt or repaired furnace. For instance, one company repaired an old furnace emitting about 60 pounds per year of chromium compounds using a non

- chromium refractory patch in a series of three ‘hot’ repairs conducted over a year. These hot repairs resulted in emissions that were reduced to below five pounds per year. Companies consider many factors in deciding whether to rebuild a furnace or add on controls to an existing furnace. Many variations to the basic gas

fired furnace design have been developed that dramatically alter emissions from these p rocesses. Many of these designs reduce chromium emissions by reducing wear on the furnace lining. Furnaces constructed using cast

- in

- place refractory and ceramic

- coated refractory extended the furnace life and reduced chromium emissions by reducing furna ce wear. Internal air circulation patterns within a furnace, burner height, flame shape and the reach of the flame all can change the wear pattern and wear intensity on the refractory walls. Additionally, changes to the drop of the raw materials in relat ion to the burner flames in combination with the above design options above can dramatically change the emissions from gas

- fired furnaces.

In summary, because of the advantages of oxy

- fuel glass

- melting furnaces over other wool fiberglass glass

- melting furnace technology described in the preceding discussions, we expect oxy

- fuel glass

- melting furnaces constructed of chromium refractories to replace many existing wool fiberglass glass

- melting furnaces of other designs, particularly as sources of industria l oxygen are sited near wool fiberglass facilities

. 1 4 , 1 5



### C

. C orrespondence with I ndustry

In an attempt to identify new emission control technologies in use, a voluntary information request was sent to all U.S. wool fiberglass manufacturing facilities

. T o identify new technologies , facilities were asked to identify any controls that did not fall under the following categories: electrostatic precipitator ( ESP ), s crubber, mechanical collector, fabric filter, thermal incinerator, high velocity air filter (HVAF) , mist eliminator, or ventilation system. Facilities did not list any control devices that were not previously identified. At least one wool fiberglass facility was identified to have a scrubber and dry ESP combination for controls on a furnace. Inf ormation from similar source categories show ed that a sodium hydroxide (NaOH) scrubber could be used on high

- temperature gas

- fired furnaces to reduce acid gas emissions as well as

c hromium compounds emissions

. Additionally t he EPA sent out a Section 114 I nformation Collection Request in 2011 that required PM, chromium , and hexavalent chromium testing of furnaces to help determine the current levels of control at which existing technologies are currently operating. It also required facilities to provide det ailed information on the chromium contents of furnace refractories and their use of binders. The EPA has participated in several meetings with industry representatives

1 A ‘hot’ repair is one that is done while the furnace is operating, and is therefore hot. Special precautions are taken by workers to protect themselves and their equipment from the heat generated by an air

- gas furnace.

### 9 and the w ool f iberglass trade association (NAIMA) regarding current practices and technologies used at wool fiberglass plants.

D

. Search for Other Applicable Technology Developments

In addition to the information discussed above, searches of the RACT/BACT/LAER Clearinghouse an d the Internet w ere conducted to identify other techn ologies or developments that could be applied to wool fiberglass production

. The results of these searches are described in the following paragraphs.

RACT/BACT/LAER Clearinghouse 3



### Under EPA ’ s New Source Review (NSR) program, if a company is planning to build a new plant or modify an existing plant such that air pollution emissions will increase by a large amount, the company must obtain an NSR permit. The NSR permit is a construction permit which requires the company to minimize air pollution emissions by changing the process to prevent air pollution and/or installing air pollution control equipment.

The terms “ RACT, ”“ BACT, ” and “ LAER ” are acronyms for different program requirements under the NSR program. RACT, or Reasonably Available Control Technolog y, is required on sources in areas that are not meeting national ambient air quality standards (i.e., non

- attainment areas). BACT, or Best Available Control Technology, is required on major new or modified sources in attainment areas. LAER, or Lowest Achie vable Emission Rate, is required on major new or modified sources in non

- attainment areas.

BACT and LAER (and sometimes RACT) are determined on a case

- by

- case basis, usually by State or local permitting agencies. The EPA established the RACT/BACT/LAER Cl earinghouse, or RBLC, to provide a central database of air pollution technology information (including past BACT and LAER decisions contained in NSR permits) to promote the sharing of information among permitting agencies and to aid in future case

- by

- case determinations. However, data in the RBLC are not limited to sources subject to RACT, BACT, and LAER requirements. Noteworthy prevention and control technology decisions and information are included even if they are not related to past R ACT, BACT or LAER d ecisions.

The RBLC contains over 5,000 air pollution control permit determinations that can help identify appropriate technologies to mitigate most air pollutant emission streams. It was designed to help permit applicants and reviewers make pollution prev ention and control technology decisions for stationary air pollution sources, and includes data submitted by several U.S. territories and all 50 States on over 200 different air pollutants and 1,000 industrial processes.

To identify technologies appropria te for wool fiberglass production , searches of the RBLC were made using the Process Type Code : 99.0 33

– Wool Fiberglass . A ll records from 199 9 to 201 1 were searched. In all cases, the control devices and methods identified through the RBLC search d o not represent new technologies for controlling HAP emissions

. Attachment 1 show s the results of the RBLC search for wool fiberglass

.

### 10 Internet Search

A general search of the Internet was conducted for information on control technologies for wool fiberglass f urnaces , and RS and FA manufacturing lines . The i nternet search did not identif y any new practices, processes, or technologies that have not already been considered in this review.

III. Technology Review Findings

PM Emissions

The EPA reviewed furnace emission rate data provided by facilities and found that current PM emission rates achieved by the majority of glass

- melting furnaces are significantly lower t han the current MACT limit . This is likely due to advancements in capture efficiency of current control devices

. The EPA classified PM emission rate data by control device and found that the control technology that achieves the best PM reduction when properly operated and maintained i s a fabric filter (or baghouse); these results are shown in Figure 1. In order to reflect current achievable levels , t he EPA is reducing the MACT floor limit for PM. In the November 2011 p roposal , a PM limit was set under technology review, but the PM limit was erroneously calculated using an upper predictive limit ( UPL ) MACT floor methodology which was not appropriate. In order to determine a PM limit that reflects current practices, t he EPA gathered all PM emission rates from furnace emission testing at major sources and calculated the emission rate that could be met by 99 percent of the sources for which t he EPA had data

. PM emissions rate data was available for 44 furnaces at major and area sources and the 99 th 

### percentile of the 44 furnaces was 0.33 pounds of PM per ton of glass pulled

. The EPA is proposing to revis e t he existing PM limit from 0.5 to 0. 33 lb PM/ton for existing and new sources in order to reflect current achievable PM emission levels . The majority of the emissions data provided to EPA was submitted as confidential business information (CBI); for this reason the emission rates used to calculate the new PM emission limit are not included in this memorandum. However, Figure 2 summarizes the PM emissions test data by furnace type.

Figure 1. Furnace PM E mission Rate by Control Device

### 11 Figure 2

. Furnace PM Emission Rate by Furnace Type

Chromium Compound Emissions

As previously noted, t he EPA sent out a detailed ICR in 2011 focusing on wool fiberglass furnaces to get information on chromium refractory contents, age, and emissions data related to furnaces. Additionally, in an effort to understand the various types of furnaces used in the pro duction of wool fiberglass , the EPA project team visited several wool fiberglass facilities in 2012 , and industry representatives provided detailed information on each type of furnace. After 0 0.05

0.1 0.15

0.2 0.25

0.3 0.35

0.4 0.45PM (lb/ton) 

## PM (lb/ton glass pulled) Emission Rates By Control Device Type

PM Baghouses and Fabric Filters Batch Wetting Baghouse

+ Secondary Control

ESP

Furnace

### 12 analyzing all of the data received, t he EPA has found n ew develop ments in furnace construction materials (i.e., refractory bricks) since the original promulgation of the Wool Fiberglass NESHAP. The industry indicates that high chrome refractory can extend furnace life significantly. The EPA believes the use of refractor ies with high chromium contents provides strong economic benefits for wool fiberglass companies , but a vailable data indicate d little differences between the refractories used in the highest emitting furnace s and the refractories used to construct other gla ss

- melting furnaces. The EPA did, however, f ind that oxy

- fuel , air gas and recuperative air gas furnaces have the greatest potential to emit significant levels of chromium due to the higher operating temperature above the melt. Because of their higher oper ating temperatures, gas

- fired furnaces are constructed using more chromium refractories for various parts of the furnace above the mo lten glass, including the crown. When chromium is available, as it is in the refractories above the melt in gas

- fired furnaces, it is readily converted to the hexavalent state at t he h igh er operating temperatures of the gas

- fired furnace

. Chromium emission rates by furnace type are presen ted in Figure 3

. In order to reduce chromium compound emissions from gas

- fired furnaces , t he EPA is proposing a new emissions limit of 6.0E

- 5 lb chromium compounds per ton of glass pulled for both new and existing gas

– fired furnaces . This chromium compo und limit is based on emissions test data provided by wool fiberglass facilities and reflects a level achievable by the majority of furnaces.

No wool fiberglass companies currently add controls to reduce emissions of chromium compounds. Therefore, a sear ch was conducted to determine whether technology is used at other industrial processes to remove chromium compounds, specifically hexavalent chromium. It was determined that s odium hydroxide scrubber s are in use at both chromium electroplating and in high temperature metallurgical industries for the removal of hexavalent chromium. In the case of chromium electroplating, no cooling of the exhaust gases is required for caustic scrubbing. For high temperature metallurgical applications, such as refineries, scr ap preheating, steel furnaces, galvanizing operations, heat treating and annealing furnaces, stack gases are cooled to 600 0 F

.

Figure 3

. Chromium Emission Rate by Furnace Type

### 13 IV

. References

1

. AP 42 Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Fifth Edition. Vol. I. Chapter 11.13: Glass Fiber Manufacturing. http://www.epa.gov/ttnchie1/ap42/ch11/final/c11s13.pdf

2. Wool Fiberglass Insulation Manufacturing. Background Information for Proposed Standards. December 1983

.

3

. Technology Transfer Network, Clean Air Technology Center

- RACT/BACT/LAER Clearinghouse. http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/index.cfm?action=Search.BasicSearch&lang=eg

4. Meeting Notes. Conversation between Carlos Davis, CertainTeed , Kansas City, KS and Susan Fairchil d, Environmental Scientist, US Environmental Protection Agency. April 14, 2011.

5. Meeting and Site Visit Notes. Conversation between Carlos Davis, CertainTeed , Kansas City, KS and Hugh McCullough, Environmental Scientist, Region 7, US En vironmental Prot ection Agency. 2011.

6. Wool Fiberglass Insulation Manufacturing. Background Information for Proposed Standards. December 1983.

7. Lee, Y., Nassaralla, CL., Minimization of Hexavalent Chromium in Magnesite

- chrome Refractory. Metallurgical and Materia ls Transactions, 1998

.

8. EPA Region 7 N otes on CertainTeed Kansas City Plant. June 30, 2011. EPA

- HQ

- OAR

2010

- 1042

- 0067

.

-5E-05 5E-19 5E-05 0.0001 0.00015

0.0002Oxy FuelOxy FuelOxy FuelAir GasAir GasAir GasElectric MeltElectric MeltElectric MeltElectric MeltElectric MeltElectric MeltElectric MeltElectric MeltElectric MeltESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSOxy FuelOxy FuelOxy FuelOxy FuelOxy FuelOxy FuelOxy FuelElectric MeltElectric MeltElectric MeltElectric MeltElectric MeltElectric MeltElectric MeltESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSCr Emission Rate (lb/ton) 

### Chromium Emission Rate (lb/ton) by Furnace

6.0E-5 Limit 

### Major Sources Area Sources Furnaces out of graph range

### 14 9. Compressive Creep and Thermophyscial Performance of Refractory Materials. US Department of Energy and Oak Ridge National Laboratory. June 2006 pp. 63.

10

. Meeting and Site Visit Notes. Conversation between Ca rlos Davis, CertainTeed, Kansas City, KS and Hugh McCullough, Environmental Scientist, Region 7, US Environmental Protection Agency. April 2011

11. E mail from Lauren Alterman (Saint Gobain) to EPA, July 27, 2012

.

12. Minutes of EPA Meeting with Representatives of the Wool Fiberglass Industry and NAIMA

. August 31, 2011.

13. Myles, T., Knee, F., “New High Chrome Fused Cast Refractory for Use in Conta ct With Highly Corrosive Glasses”. Ceramic Engi neering and Science Proceedings. The American Ceramic Society, 1986.

14. Letter from A. Crane, NAIMA to S. Fairchild, US EPA, dated January 28, 2013

. 15. Baukal, Charles, et al , Oxygen

- Enhanced Combustion

. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1998

. 16. Notes from Steffan Johnson on Caustic Scrubbing of Hexavalent Chromium Emissions from Industrial Sources. October 26, 2011.

## COMPREHENSIVE REPORT Report Date:02/07/2013 

## Facility Information

RBLC ID: 

## SC-0145 (draft) Date Determination Last Updated: 12/20/2012 Corporate/Company Name: AGY, LLC Permit Number: 0080-0117-CD-R1

Facility Name: AGY, LLC Permit Date: 02/01/2010 (actual) Facility Contact: PENNY WILLIAMS 8036431212 PENNY.WILLIAMS@AGY.COM FRS Number: 110000355393 Facility Description: THIS FACILITY USES RAW MATERIALS SUCH AS GLASS, SILICA, AND OTHER MINERAL

PRODUCTS AND MANUFACTURES FIBERGLASS STRANDS FOR USE IN VARIOUS OTHER INDUSTRIES. CONSTRUCTION PERMIT 0080-0117-CA ISSUED AUGUST 30, 2007 BECAME INVALID UPON ISSUANCE OF 0080-0117-CD. THIS REVISION (0080-0117-CD-R1) INCLUDES A CONDITION TO CLARIFY THAT ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS IN 0080-0117-CA AND 0080-0017-CD HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED IN THIS PSD/112(G) CONSTRUCTION PERMIT. SIC Code: 3229

Permit Type: A: New/Greenfield Facility NAICS Code: 327212 Permit URL: EPA Region: 4 COUNTRY: USA Facility County: AIKEN Facility State: SC Facility ZIP Code: 29801 Permit Issued By: SOUTH CAROLINA DEPT OF HEALTH & ENV CTRL, BUREAU OF AIR QUALITY (Agency Name)

MR. DENNIS CAMIT(Agency Contact) (803)898-4284 camitdr@dhec.sc.gov Other Agency Contact Info: WANDA PARNELL (803) 898-4123

Permit Notes: CONSTRUCTION PERMIT 0080-0117-CA ISSUED AUGUST 30, 2007 BECAME INVALID UPON ISSUANCE OF 0080-0117-CD. THIS

REVISION (0080-0117-CD-R1) INCLUDES A CONDITION TO CLARIFY THAT ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS IN 0080-0117-CA AND 0080-0017-CD HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED IN THIS PSD/112(G) CONSTRUCTION PERMIT.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: PARAMELT SYSTEM Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel:Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 2700.00 LB/H

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: None selected in SAE Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 26.0000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 111.0000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Y Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: OPERATING PERMIT Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Methanol

CAS Number: 67-56-1 Test Method: None selected in SAE Pollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) , Organic Compounds (all) , Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 16.2300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 71.0900 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Y Case-by-Case Basis: MACT Other Applicable Requirements: OPERATING PERMIT Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonIncremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP)

CAS Number: HAP Test Method: None selected in SAE Pollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) ) Emission Limit 1: 16.2300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 87.1300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Y Case-by-Case Basis: MACT Other Applicable Requirements: OPERATING PERMIT Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Facility Information

RBLC ID: 

## SC-0144 (draft) Date Determination Last Updated: 12/20/2012 Corporate/Company Name: AGY, LLC Permit Number: 0080-0117-CD

Facility Name: AGY, LLC Permit Date: 01/19/2010 (actual) Facility Contact: PENNY WILLIAMS 8036431212 PENNY.WILLIAMS@AGY.COM FRS Number: 110000355393 Facility Description: THIS FACILITY USES RAW MATERIALS SUCH AS GLASS, SILICA, AND OTHER MINERAL PRODUCTS AND MANUFACTURES FIBERGLASS STRANDS FOR USE IN VARIOUS OTHER INDUSTRIES. THIS PSD CONSTRUCTION PERMIT SUPERSEDES 0080-0117-CA ISSUED AUGUST 30, 2007. SIC Code: 3229Permit Type: A: New/Greenfield Facility NAICS Code: 327212

Permit URL: EPA Region: 4 COUNTRY: USA Facility County: AIKEN Facility State: SC Facility ZIP Code: 29801 Permit Issued By: SOUTH CAROLINA DEPT OF HEALTH & ENV CTRL, BUREAU OF AIR QUALITY (Agency Name) MR. DENNIS CAMIT(Agency Contact) (803)898-4284 camitdr@dhec.sc.gov Other Agency Contact Info: WANDA PARNELL (803) 898-4123

Permit Notes: THIS PSD CONSTRUCTION PERMIT SUPERSEDES 0080-0117-CA ISSUED AUGUST 30, 2007.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: PARAMELT SYSTEM Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput: 2700.00 LB/H

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: None selected in SAE Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 26.0000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 111.0000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Y Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: OPERATING PERMIT Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonCompliance Verified: Yes

Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Methanol

CAS Number: 67-56-1 Test Method: None selected in SAE Pollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) , Organic Compounds (all) , Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 16.2300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 71.0900 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Y Case-by-Case Basis: MACT Other Applicable Requirements: OPERATING PERMIT Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP)

CAS Number: HAP Test Method: None selected in SAE Pollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) ) Emission Limit 1: 16.2300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 87.1300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Y Case-by-Case Basis: MACT Other Applicable Requirements: OPERATING PERMIT Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonCompliance Verified: Yes

Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Facility Information

RBLC ID: 

## TX-0505 (final) Date Determination Last Updated: 04/10/2008 Corporate/Company Name: CERTAINTEED CORP. Permit Number: PSD-TX 1051

AND 56065 Facility Name: CERTAINTEED INSULATION FIBER GLASS AND DUCTLINER MANUFACTURI Permit Date: 04/19/2006 (actual) Facility Contact: FRS Number: 110000743660 Facility Description: (A DETAILED PROCESS DESCRIPTION IS PROVIDED IN THE CONFIDENTIAL PERMIT FILE.) FOR THE

EXISTING DUCTLINER MANUFACTURING LINE, RAW MATERIALS ARE RECEIVED IN BULK IN THE FORMING AREA. IN THIS AREA, THE PRODUCT IS FORMED AND A RESIN WILL BE APPLIED. THE RESULTING PRODUCT IS TRANSPORTED BY CONVEYOR TO A RESIN CURING OVEN, WHERE THE RESIN IS HEATED AND FULLY CURED. ONCE THE RESIN IS CURED, THE PRODUCT TRAVELS BY CONVEYOR TO AN IN-LINE COATER. THE COATED PRODUCT TRAVELS THROUGH A NATURAL GAS-FIRED DRYING OVEN AND FINALLY TO THE LABELING, PACKAGING, AND SHIPPING PROCESS. THE PROPOSED LINES, BI LINE AND IS LINE, WILL BOTH UTILIZE GLASS PRODUCED FROM COMMON RAW MATERIAL HANDLING AND FURNACE OPERATIONS; GLASS PRODUCED IN THE FURNACE SHALL NOT BE USED ON THE PREVIOUSLY EXISTING DUCTLINER MANUFACTURING LINE UNLESS IT IS SCRAP MATERIAL THAT WOULD NOT OTHERWISE BE SALEABLE. THE PLANT PROPOSES TO RECEIVE RAW MATERIAL VIA BOTH RAILCAR AND TRUCK, THESE MATERIALS WILL BE STORED IN VARIOUS SILOS. FROM THE SILOS, RAW MATERIAL WILL BE MEASURED AND FED INTO BATCH MIXERS AND PNEUMATICALLY TRANSFERRED TO MIXED-BATCH BINS THAT FEED THE MIXED RAW MATERIALS INTO THE FURNACE. IN THE FURNACE, THE RAW MATERIALS WILL BE HEATED AND PROCESSED INTO MOLTEN GLASS BEFORE BEING GRAVITY-FED FROM THE FURNACE INTO THE TWO FOREHEARTHS OF THE PROPOSED NEW FIBERGLASS MANUFACTURING LINES WHERE THE MOLTEN GLASS WILL BE REFINED (I.E., BUBBLES AND PARTICLES WILL BE REMOVED) AND DISTRIBUTED TO THE BI LINE AND THE IS LINE. THE MOLTEN GLASS FROM BI LINE FOREHEARTH WILL BE GRAVITY FED INTO THE BI LINE FORMING SECTION WHERE THE GLASS WILL BE FIBERIZED, BINDER WILL BE APPLIED, AND A FIBERGLASS MAT WILL BE FORMED. THE FORMED MAT WILL THEN BE TRANSFERRED TO THE CURING OVEN. FORM THE CURING OVEN, THE CURED MAT WILL BE CONVEYED THROUGH THE COOLING SECTION WHERE THE MAT WILL BE AIR-COOLED. THE CURED AND COOLED MAT WILL THEN BE SLIT, A VAPOR BARRIER MAY BE APPLIED, AND THE MAT WILL BE CUT, ROLLED, AND PAC SIC Code: 1793

Permit Type: A: New/Greenfield Facility NAICS Code: 221210Permit URL:

EPA Region: 6 COUNTRY: USA Facility County: GRAYSON Facility State: TX Facility ZIP Code: 25092 Permit Issued By: TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (TCEQ) (Agency Name)

MR. JOHNNY VERMILLION(Agency Contact) (512) 239-1292 John.Vermillion@tceq.texas.gov Permit Notes: Facility-wide Emissions: Pollutant Name: Facility-wide Emissions Increase:

Carbon Monoxide 295.2200 (Tons/Year) Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) -24.2000 (Tons/Year) Particulate Matter (PM) 321.2600 (Tons/Year) Sulfur Oxides (SOx) 0.8000 (Tons/Year) Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) 141.8500 (Tons/Year)



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: STORAGE SILOS (20) Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EMISSIONS ARE PER SILO

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.6100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency:Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: UNLOADING/TRANSPORT BULIDING BAGHOUSE STACK Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.6600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: UNLOADING AREA VACUUM CLEANER BAGHOUSE STACK Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033))Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033))

Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: BATCH BLENDER BAGHOUSE STACK (4) Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EMISSIONS ARE PER STACK

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) )Emission Limit 1: 0.1100 LB/H

Emission Limit 2: 0.4800 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: BATCH HOLD BIN BAGHOUSE STACK (2) Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.7000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonIncremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FURNACE

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033))

Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: THE FURNACE WILL GENERATE EMISSIONS OF CO, NOX, PM/PM10, SO2, AND VOC; CERTAINTEED PROPOSES TO LIMIT EMISSIONS

FROM THE FURNACE AS FOLLOWS: NO MORE THAN 1.40 LBS NOX / TON OF GLASS PRODUCED, THROUGHOUT THE LIFE OF THE FURNACE; NO MORE THAN 1.00 LB PM / TON OF GLASS PRODUCED, INCLUDING BOTH SOLID AND CONDENSIBLE PM; AND NO MORE THAN 1.70 LBS SO2 / TON GLASS PRODUCED. A DRY ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR (ESP) WITH AN OUTLET GRAIN LOADING OF NO MORE THAN 0.15 GR/DSCF TO ACHIEVE THE NO MORE THAN 1.00 LB. PM/TON OF GLASS PRODUCED. ALSO, THE PM/PM10 PERFORMANCE LEVEL OF THIS FURNACE IS PROPOSED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF 40 CFR 63, SUBPART NNN.

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 4.0400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 17.7000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 22.6300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 99.1200 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 8.0800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 35.3900 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.7000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.7300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 3.2000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: BI/LI LINE FREHEAT FUGITIVES (8) Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EMISSIONS ARE PER LINE (BI AND LI)

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.6600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 2.8900 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.7800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 3.4200 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: UCase-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD

Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.2600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0200 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: UCase-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD

Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.1800 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: BI STACK

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033))

Primary Fuel: Throughput:Throughput:

Process Notes: BI LINE FIBER AND MAT FORMING, CURING, AND COOLING: THIS FIBER AND MAT FORMING, CURING, AND COOLING PROCESS

GENERATES PRODUCTS OF COMBUSTION, VOC, NH3, FORMALDEHYDE, AND PHENOL EMISSIONS. PM/PM10 EMISSIONS WILL BE MINIMIZED BY USING ONE WET ESP WITH AN OUTLET GRAIN LOADING OF NO MORE THAN 0.03 GR/DSCF ON EACH OF THE TWO FORMING SECTION EXHAUSTS AND ONE WET ESP WITH AN OUTLET GRAIN LOADING OF NO MORE THAN 0.03GR/DSCF ON THE CURING/COOLING SECTION. FIRING ONLY SWEET NATURAL GAS AND IMPLEMENTING GOOD ENGINEERING PRACTICES IN THE FIBERIZERS AND THE CURING OVEN WILL MINIMIZE PRODUCTS OF COMBUSTION EMISSIONS.

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 34.4500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 150.8900 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 8.8300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 38.6800 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N)Est. % Efficiency:

Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 32.0700 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 140.4700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0400 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N)Est. % Efficiency:

Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 23.3200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 102.1400 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Ammonia (NH3)

CAS Number: 7664-41-7 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 73.8500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 323.4600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N)Est. % Efficiency:

Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Formaldehyde

CAS Number: 50-00-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) , Organic Compounds (all) , Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 7.0700 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 30.9700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Phenol

CAS Number: 108-95-2 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) , Organic Compounds (all) , Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 6.4500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 28.2500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N)Est. % Efficiency:

Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Methanol

CAS Number: 67-56-1 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) , Organic Compounds (all) , Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.8600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 8.1500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: IS LINE FIBER FOAMING WET SCRUBBER STACK

Process Type: 90.016 (Glass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: SWEAT NATURAL GAS Throughput:

Process Notes: IS LINE FIBER FORMING: THESE OPERATIONS RESULT IN EMISSIONS OF CO, NOX, PM/PM10, SO2 , AND VOC. PRODUCTS OF

COMBUSTION EMISSIONS FROM THE FIBERIZERS WILL BE REDUCED BY FIRING ONLY SWEET NATURAL GAS AND IMPLEMENTING GOOD ENGINEERING PRACTICES; PM/PM10 EMISSIONS WILL BE MINIMIZED BY USING FOUR WET-TYPE CYCLONIC SCRUBBERS IN SERIES EACH WITH AN OUTLET GRAIN LOADING OF NO MORE THAN 0.03 GR/DSCF.POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 28.6000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 125.2700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 7.3300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 32.1100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 26.6200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 116.6000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 2.4900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 10.9100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0400 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: BI LINE PRODUCT LABELING

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: BI LINE PRODUCT LABELING: A SMALL QUANTITY OF VOC AND HAP EMISSIONS WILL BE GENERATED FROM THE BI LINE

PRODUCT LABELING AREAS. THE COMPANY PROPOSES TO MINIMIZE VOC EMISSIONS FROM THESE OPERATIONS BY IMPLEMENTING GOOD HOUSEKEEPING PROCEDURES. THE TOTAL VOC EMISSION RATE FROM THESE OPERATIONS IS LESS THAN 10 TONS PER YEAR. THE COMPANY IS NOT PROPOSING ANY ADD-ON CONTROLS FOR THESE LABELING OPERATIONS.

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 4.5400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 9.8500 T/YRStandard Emission:

Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP)

CAS Number: HAP Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.0400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 2.2300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: PRODUCT TRIMMING AND PACKAGING

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) PrimaryPrimary

Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: PRODUCT TRIMMING AND PACKAGING: PM/PM10 EMISSIONS WILL BE GENERATED FROM THE TWO BI LINE PRODUCT TRIMMING

AND PACKAGING AREAS. PM/PM10 EMISSIONS WILL BE MINIMIZED BY USING A FABRIC FILTER BAGHOUSE WITH AN OUTLET GRAIN LOADING OF NO MORE THAN 0.01GR/DSCF ON EACH OF THE TWO BI LINE TRIMMING AND PACKAGING AREAS. THE IS LINE PACKAGING AREA EXHAUST WILL BE ROUTED BACK TO THE IS LINE FIBER FORMING SECTION, THERE WILL BE NO EMISSIONS EXHAUSTED TO THE ATMOSPHERE FROM THIS PROCESS.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 2.5700 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 11.2600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Facility Information

RBLC ID: 

## GA-0128 (final) Date Determination Last Updated: 10/09/2008 Corporate/Company Name: JOHNS MANVILLE Permit Number: 3296-013-0005-V-01-1 Facility Name: JOHNS MANVILLE Permit Date: 08/11/2004 (actual) Facility Contact: CHRIS GEORGES 7708670223 GEORGESC@JM.COM FRS Number: 110000358808 Facility Description: FIBERGLASS INSULATION MANUFACTURING SIC Code: 3296 Permit Type: C: Modify process at existing facility NAICS Code: 327993Permit URL:

EPA Region: 4 COUNTRY: USA Facility County: BARROW Facility State: GA Facility ZIP Code: 30680 Permit Issued By: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (Agency Name) MR. JOHN YNTEMA(Agency Contact) (404)363-7117 john_yntema@dnr.state.ga.us Other Agency Contact Info: JOHN YNTEMA 404-363-7117 JOHN.YNTEMA@DNR.STATE.GA.US Permit Notes: THIS IS A REVISION TO A PREVIOUS PSD-BACT CO LIMIT FROM 1.277 LB/HR TO 9.122 LB/HR, TRIGGERING PSD REVIEW. Affected Boundaries: Boundary Type: Class 1 Area State: Boundary: Distance: CLASS1 GA Cohutta 100km - 50km Facility-wide Emissions: Pollutant Name: Facility-wide Emissions Increase: Carbon Monoxide 35.0000 (Tons/Year) Sulfur Oxides (SOx) 20.0000 (Tons/Year)



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FIBERGLASS PROCESS LINE 106 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS Throughput:

Process Notes: REVISION TO PREVIOUS PSD-BACT LIMIT TO CO, NO PHYSICAL CHANGE

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 9.1220 LB/H Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: NSPSControl Method: (N)

Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: RAISED FROM 1.277 LB/H FROM PREVIOUS BACT DETERMINATION



## Facility Information

RBLC ID: 

## TX-0460 (final) Date Determination Last Updated: 09/26/2007 Corporate/Company Name: JOHNS MANVILLE INC Permit Number: P1025 Facility Name: CLEBURNE PLANT Permit Date: 11/20/2003 (actual) Facility Contact: MR. JARED KERNEY 8175566659 FRS Number: 110017693156 Facility Description: FIBERGLASS MANUFACTURING PLANT SIC Code: 3296 Permit Type: U: Unspecified NAICS Code: 327993 Permit URL: EPA Region: 6 COUNTRY: USA Facility County: JOHNSON Facility State: TX Facility ZIP Code: Permit Issued By: TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (TCEQ) (Agency Name) MR. JOHNNY VERMILLION(Agency Contact) (512) 239-1292 John.Vermillion@tceq.texas.gov Permit Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: LINE 92 AND 93 FILTERS Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 33.5000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 146.7300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 21.6100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 94.6400 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 11.7600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 51.5100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 6.5300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 28.6500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 57.4600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 251.6700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Ammonia (NH3)

CAS Number: 7664-41-7 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 36.0000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 157.6800 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:POLLUTANT NAME: Formaldehyde

CAS Number: 50-00-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) , Organic Compounds (all) , Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 8.5000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 37.2300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Phenol

CAS Number: 108-95-2 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) , Organic Compounds (all) , Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 4.1200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 18.0500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:POLLUTANT NAME: Methanol

CAS Number: 67-56-1 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) , Organic Compounds (all) , Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 3.6900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 16.1500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: GLASS FURNACES Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 8.1600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 35.7400 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSDOther Applicable Requirements:

Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.0700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 14.3500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 62.8500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSDOther Applicable Requirements:

Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 6.8500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 30.0000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 2.0000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 8.7600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSDOther Applicable Requirements:

Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Hydrogen Fluoride

CAS Number: 7664-39-3 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.6100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: 1901 FOREHEARTH (4) AND 1902 FURNACE FOREHEARTH (4) Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EMISSIONS ARE PER SET

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)CAS Number: 7446-09-5

Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 1.1000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 4.8000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)CAS Number: PM

Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.1000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.4600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 6.4000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant InformationPROCESS NAME: 1901 FORMING AREA

Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.4400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 6.3100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 4.3900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 19.2000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N)Control Method: (N)

Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Ammonia (NH3)

CAS Number: 7664-41-7 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.4400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.9300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: 1901 BATCH PLANT (4) Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PMTest Method: Unspecified

Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.2800 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: MIXING BINS (2) Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0140 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N)Est. % Efficiency:

Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: WET SCRUBBERS 1-4 Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EMISSIONS ARE PER SCRUBBER

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 4.5000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 16.4300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: UnspecifiedPollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) )

Emission Limit 1: 3.8400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 14.0300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.2900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 5.6500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: UnspecifiedPollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) )

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 9.1500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 40.0800 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Ammonia (NH3)

CAS Number: 7664-41-7 Test Method: UnspecifiedPollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds )

Emission Limit 1: 4.2000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 15.3300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Formaldehyde

CAS Number: 50-00-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) , Organic Compounds (all) , Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.9000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 3.2900 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Phenol

CAS Number: 108-95-2 Test Method: UnspecifiedPollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) , Organic Compounds (all) , Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) )

Emission Limit 1: 0.9000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 3.2900 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: OVEN WET SCRUBBER Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 4.5100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 19.7500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency:Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 7.1600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 31.3600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 3.5000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 15.3300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency:Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0200 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 22.2800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 97.5900 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency:Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Ammonia (NH3)

CAS Number: 7664-41-7 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 6.6900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 29.3000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Formaldehyde

CAS Number: 50-00-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) , Organic Compounds (all) , Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 2.1000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 7.6700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency:Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Phenol

CAS Number: 108-95-2 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) , Organic Compounds (all) , Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.2000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 4.3800 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: BAGHOUSE 1 Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) )Emission Limit 1: 0.7400 LB/H

Emission Limit 2: 3.2400 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 7.1600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 31.3600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) )Emission Limit 1: 0.3300 LB/H

Emission Limit 2: 1.4500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds )Emission Limit 1: 0.0700 LB/H

Emission Limit 2: 0.3000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: BAGHOUSE 2-9 Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EMISSIONS ARE PER STACK

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.1300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonIncremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: WASTE RE-FEED BAGHOUSE (2) Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EMISSIONS ARE PER BAG

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0120 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: OFF-LINE WAST BAGHOUSE Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel:Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.3600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: E-GLASS RECLAIM AREA (4) Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.6200 LB/HEmission Limit 2: 2.7200 T/YR

Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.4500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.9700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1000 LB/HEmission Limit 2: 0.4400 T/YR

Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Ammonia (NH3)

CAS Number: 7664-41-7 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1000 LB/HEmission Limit 2: 0.4400 T/YR

Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.3500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: OFFLINE GROOVING MACHINE (4) Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel:Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.6100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Facility Information

RBLC ID: 

## TX-0363 (final) Date Determination Last Updated: 01/03/2005 Corporate/Company Name: VETROTEX AMERICA Permit Number: PSD-TX-784

M1 Facility Name: SAINT-GOBAIN VETROTEX AMERICA Permit Date: 11/13/2000 (actual) Facility Contact: CARLOS DAVIS FRS Number: 110000460126 Facility Description: VETROTEX AMERICA (VETROTEX) OPERATES A FIBER GLASS MANUFACTURING PLANT. THE

VETROTEX PLANT PRODUCES FIBERGLASS REINFORCEMENT PRODUCTS AND IS COMPRISED OF FIVE GLASS MANUFACTURING FURNACES AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT. THESE REFINFORCEMENT PRODUCTS ARE USED IN NUMEROUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES TO ADD STRENGTH, STIFFNESS, AND FATIGUE RESISTANCE TO VARIOUS TYPES OF MATERIALS. FIBER GLASS MANUFACTURING IS BASICALLY THE HIGH-TEMPERATURE MELTING OF PARTICULAR SIC Code: 2821RAW MATERIALS THAT ARE FURTHER OCNVERTED INTO A GLASS FIBER STRAND. THIS STRAND IS USED TO PRODUCE SEVERAL REINFORCEMENT PRODUCTS. THE FACILITY IS AN EXISTING MAJOR SOURCE AS THE PTE FOR PM, PM10, NOX, SO2, CO, AND VOC ARE EACH GREATER THAN 100 T/YR. PSD REVIEW IS REQUIRED FOR NOX. THE COMPANY PROPOSED THE FOLLOWING CHANGES: INCREASED PRODUCTION ON THE FURNACE 5 MANUFACTURING LINE; INSTALL A RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BUSHING ON ONE OF THE MANUFACTURING LINES; INCREASE VOC EMISSIONS ON THE FURNACE 3 MANUFACTURING LINES, CHANGE A PRIMARY OPERATING PARAMETER MINIMUM OPERATING LIMIT; CHANGE THE REPRESENTATION REGARDING THE ALLOCATION OF ANNUAL SIZE-RELATED VOC EMISSIONS AMONG THE FIVE FURNACES; AND, ADD ANOTHER NEW SIZE CHEMICAL ON THE FURNACE 3 MANUFACTURING LINE. Permit Type: D: Both B (Add new process to existing facility) &C (Modify process at existing facility) NAICS Code: 325211 Permit URL: EPA Region: 6 COUNTRY: USA Facility County: WICHITA Facility State: TX Facility ZIP Code: 76310 Permit Issued By: TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (TCEQ) (Agency Name)

MR. JOHNNY VERMILLION(Agency Contact) (512) 239-1292 John.Vermillion@tceq.texas.gov Other Agency Contact Info: STEPHANIE HOWELL

PO BOX 13087 SUSTIN, TX 78711-3087 512-239-1560 Permit Notes: FIBER GLASS MANUFACUTRING MODIFICATION FROM 12/27/2002: THE PERMIT ALLOWS A ONE- TIME EXTENSION FOR START

OF CONSTRUCTION OR FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MODIFICATIONS AUTHORIZED BY THIS AMENDMENT FOR EACH OF FURNACE 1, 2, AND 5.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: (10) SILOS, ENTRY A Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPNS: E-1, E-2, E-3, E-4, E-5, E-6, E-7A&B, E-8, E-9

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: UnspecifiedPollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) )

Emission Limit 1: 0.0700 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.3200 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: (2) SILOS, ENTRY B Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPNS: E-2A, E-3A

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1400 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.6100 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency:Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV, EACH Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV, EACH Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: (2) SILOS, ENTRY C Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPNS: E-10, E-11

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) )Emission Limit 1: 0.1200 LB/H

Emission Limit 2: 0.5100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: (4) BATCH BLENDERS Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPNS: E-15, E-15A, E-16, E-16A. ASSUMED THE BLENDERS MIXED THE RAW MATERIALS.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1600 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.7200 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonIncremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: SCALE 5 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0800 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FURNACE NO. 1 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: NAT GASPrimary Fuel: NAT GAS

Throughput:

Process Notes: ASSUMED TEXTILE-TYPE FIBER FORMED.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 13.6800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 59.9300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) ESP & SCRUBBER Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.0700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonIncremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 13.8700 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 60.7500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) GOOD ENGINEERING PRACTICES Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 20.3100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 88.9600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) ESP & SCRUBBER Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonIncremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.7100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 10.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 10.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) ESP AND SCRUBBER Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonIncremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FURNACE NO 2

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: NAT GAS Throughput:

Process Notes: FURNACE NO. 2 SHALL NOT OPERATE AFTER MARCH 31, 2003 UNTIL IT IS CONVERTED TO OPERATE USING AN OXY-FUEL

PROCESS. ASSUMED A TEXTILE-TYPE FIBER FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSIGNING AN SCC CODE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 7.0900 LB/H SEE NOTE Emission Limit 2: 31.0500 T/YR SEE NOTE Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) GOOD ENGINEERING PRACTICES Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: UNTIL MARCH 31, THIS PROCESS IS ALLOWED A MAXIMUM HOURLY NOX EMISSION RATE OF 28.05 LB/H AND A MAXIMUM ANNUAL NOX EMISSION RATE OF 122.86 T/YR.

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: UnspecifiedTest Method: Unspecified

Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 20.3100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 88.9600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) ESP & SCRUBBER Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 13.6800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 59.9300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) ESP & SCRUBBER Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VETest Method: Unspecified

Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 10.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 10.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV. Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) ESP AND SCRUBBER Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.7100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOCTest Method: Unspecified

Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.0700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FURNACE NO 3 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: NAT GAS Throughput:

Process Notes: ASSUMED A TEXTILE-TYPE FIBER FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSIGNING A CODE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 5.4600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 23.9100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: NSPS Control Method: (A) ESP & SCRUBBEREst. % Efficiency:

Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 6.6600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 29.1700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) ESP & SCRUBBER Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.7600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 3.3300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATEDEst. % Efficiency:

Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.2300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 10.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 10.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) ESP AND SCRUBBEREst. % Efficiency:

Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 11.4600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 50.1900 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) GOOD ENGINEERING PRACTICES Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FURNACE NO 4

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: NAT GAS Throughput:

Process Notes: FURNACE NO. 4 SHALL NOT OPERATE AFTER MARCH 31, 2003 UNTIL IT IS CONVERTED TO OPERATE USING AN OXY-FUEL

PROCESS. ASSUMED A TEXTILE-TYPE FIBER FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSIGNING AN SCC CODE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)CAS Number: 7446-09-5

Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 9.0300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 39.5500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) ESP & SCRUBBER Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 7.8800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 34.5100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) GOOD ENGINEERING PRACTICES Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)CAS Number: VOC

Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.1400 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 10.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 10.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) ESP AND SCRUBBER Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)CAS Number: PM

Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 5.0800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 22.2500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) ESP & SCRUBBER Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.5200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 2.2800 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant InformationPROCESS NAME: BATCH HOLD BIN NO 1

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.0700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: (3) BATCH HOLD BIN NO 2, 3A, & 4 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VETest Method: Unspecified

Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2500 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 1.0700 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant InformationPROCESS NAME: BATCH HOLD BIN NO 3B

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.7100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSEEst. % Efficiency:

Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: CLEANING OVEN Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.4000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: (6) HOT AIR DRYER NO 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033))

Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.7100 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 3.1100 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.9300 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 4.0700 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency:Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 5.0200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 21.9900 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0300 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.1300 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency:Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED PROCESSES ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS 'TOTAL SIZE COMPOUNDS.' TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS ARE LIMITED TO 333.33 LB/H AND 265.16 T/YR.

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 10.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 10.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN, EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency:Est. % Efficiency:

Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: DIELECTRIC OVEN NO 38 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.6600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: UnspecifiedPollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) )

Emission Limit 1: SEE POLLUTANT NOTES Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED PROCESSES ARE COMBINED AND LISTED AS 'TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS'. TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS ARE LIMITED TO 333.33 LB/H AND 265.16 T/YR.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: RTP DRYER NO 15 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency:Est. % Efficiency:

Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.4500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.2200 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATEDEst. % Efficiency:

Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.4500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR LESS THAN Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATEDEst. % Efficiency:

Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H SEE NOTE Emission Limit 2: 0.0400 T/YR SEE NOTE Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED PROCESSES ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS 'TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS'. TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS ARE LIMITED TO 333.33 LB/H AND 265.16 T/YR.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: MAT LINE (DRYERS & CLEANER) Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VETest Method: Unspecified

Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 10.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 10.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0900 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102Test Method: Unspecified

Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.4500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.9700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.6600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5Test Method: Unspecified

Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.3200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 5.7800 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant InformationPROCESS NAME: (2) DIELECTRIC DRYERS NO 1 & 2

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.4800 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 333.3000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 265.1600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATEDEst. % Efficiency:

Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: HOT AIR DRYER NO 45 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 10.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 10.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: UnspecifiedPollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) )

Emission Limit 1: 0.7100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 3.1100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN Emission Limit 2: 0.0200 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: UnspecifiedPollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds )

Emission Limit 1: 5.0200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 21.9900 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.1800 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED PROCESSES ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS 'TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS'. TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS ARE LIMITED TO 333.33 LB/H AND 265.16 T/YR.

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: UnspecifiedTest Method: Unspecified

Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.3300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 5.8300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: BOILER NO. 2 Process Type: 19.600 (Misc. Boilers, Furnaces, Heaters) Primary Fuel: NAT GAS Throughput:

Process Notes: ASSUMED

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.2700 T/YR Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATEDEst. % Efficiency:

Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0700 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.1500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 3.4000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 7.4500 T/YR Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATEDEst. % Efficiency:

Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0900 T/YR Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.8500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.8600 T/YR Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATEDEst. % Efficiency:

Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: (2) EMERGENCY GENERATORS NO. 1 & 2 Process Type: 19.800 (Misc. Internal Combustion Engines) Primary Fuel: DIESEL Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.2100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0800 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: UnspecifiedPollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) )

Emission Limit 1: 1.6500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.1100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 5.5100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.3700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: UnspecifiedPollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds )

Emission Limit 1: 12.0100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.8000 T/YR Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 50.7700 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 3.4000 T/YR Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: PROPANE FLAREProcess Type: 19.390 (Other Flares)

Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 7.2900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.7300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0200 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency:Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 13.2800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.3300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) FLARE IS A VOC CONTROL Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 3.6500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.3700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency:Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.4900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FUEL FUGITIVES & DIESEL STORAGE TANK Process Type: 42.009 (Volatile Organic Liquid Storage) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) )Emission Limit 1: 3.0600 LB/H

Emission Limit 2: 13.4200 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: NSPS Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE ONLY.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: PROPANE EVAPORATOR NO. 1 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR LESS THAN Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonIncremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR LESS THAN Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonIncremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR LESS THAN Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonIncremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: (3) PROPANE EVAPORATORS NO 2, 3, 4 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR LESS THAN Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3100 LB/HEmission Limit 2: 0.0800 T/YR

Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR LESS THAN Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0200 LB/HEmission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR LESS THAN

Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FORMING LINE NO 1 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel:Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 2.6200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 11.4600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) SCRUBBER Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: SEE POLLUTANT NOTES Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: UnknownCompliance Verified: Unknown

Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED PROCESSES ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS 'TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS'. TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS ARE LIMITED TO 333.33 LB/H AND 265.16 T/YR.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FORMING LINE NO 2 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: SEE POLLUTANT NOTES Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED PROCESSES ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS 'TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS'. TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS ARE LIMITED TO 333.33 LB/H AND 265.16 T/YR.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) )Emission Limit 1: 2.3200 LB/H

Emission Limit 2: 10.1400 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) SCRUBBER Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FORMING LINE NO 3 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: SEE POLLUTANT NOTES Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonIncremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED PROCESSES ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS 'TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS'. TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS ARE LIMITED TO 333.33 LB/H AND 265.16 T/YR.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 3.9800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 17.4600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) SCRUBBER Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FORMING LINE NO 4 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) )Emission Limit 1: SEE POLLUTANT NOTES

Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED PROCESSES ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS 'TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS'. TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS ARE LIMITED TO 333.33 LB/H AND 265.16 T/YR.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 2.7300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 11.9500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) SCRUBBER Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: (2) FURNACE FOREHEARTHS NO 1 & 2Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033))

Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.8100 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 3.5600 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0300 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.1300 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency:Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0200 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.0700 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0400 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency:Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.8900 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FURNACE FOREHEARTH NO 3 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) )Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN

Emission Limit 2: 0.0200 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.5900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 2.6000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds )Emission Limit 1: 0.1300 LB/H

Emission Limit 2: 0.5500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.1400 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) )Emission Limit 1: 0.0700 LB/H

Emission Limit 2: 0.3100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FURNACE NO 4 FOREHEARTH & RTP CHOPPER Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.4900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 2.1500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonIncremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.8900 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN Emission Limit 2: 0.0400 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonIncremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.8100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 3.5600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonIncremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: (2) NO 1 SCALES BATCH BLENDER/REJECT TANK Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0600 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.2800 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: HOT AIR DRYER NO 98 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel:Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.7100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 3.1100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonIncremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 5.0200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 21.9900 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.1300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonIncremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED PROCESSES ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS 'TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS'. TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS ARE LIMITED TO 333.33 LB/H AND 265.16 T/YR.

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.9300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 4.0700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 10.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 10.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonCost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: (2) RTP DRYERS 10 & 11

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS LIMITED TO 333.3 LB/H AND 265.16 T/YR. TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND BASE IS LIMITED TO 6.85

LB/H AND 30.0 T/YR.

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR LESS THAN Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102Test Method: Unspecified

Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3300 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 1.4500 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0500 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.2200 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOCTest Method: Unspecified

Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.0400 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3300 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 1.4500 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VETest Method: Unspecified

Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: DIELECTRIC OVEN NO 101 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.3500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATEDEst. % Efficiency:

Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: SEE POLLUTANT NOTES Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED PROCESSES ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS 'TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS'. TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS ARE LIMITED TO 333.33 LB/H AND 265.16 T/YR.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: POST CURING OVEN NO 1 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PMTest Method: Unspecified

Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR LESS THAN Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0900 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5Test Method: Unspecified

Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR LESS THAN Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0200 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102Test Method: Unspecified

Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0900 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: (2) POST CURING OVENS NO 2 & 3 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN, EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR LESS THAN, EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATEDEst. % Efficiency:

Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1000 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.4200 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN, EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR LESS THAN, EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATEDEst. % Efficiency:

Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0200 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.0200 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN, EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.0200 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATEDEst. % Efficiency:

Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: PNEUMATIC TRANSFER HOLD TANK Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: ASSUMED FOR TRANSFER OF FIBER GLASS RAW MATERIAL

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.0100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS (2) RTP DRYERS NO 12 & 13PROCESS

NAME: (2) RTP DRYERS NO 12 & 13

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS LIMITED TO 333.3 LB/H AND 265.16 T/YR TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND BASE IS LIMITED TO 6.85 LB/H

AND 30.0 T/YR

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV, EACH Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV, EACH Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3300 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 1.4500 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements:Other Applicable Requirements:

Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.2200 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.0400 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-CaseOther Applicable Requirements:

Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN, EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR LESS THAN, EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3300 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 1.4500 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-CaseOther Applicable Requirements:

Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: RR UNLOADING AREA VACUUM CLEANING SYSTEM Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: (3) RTP DRYERS NO 16, 17, 18

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS LIMITED TO 333.3 LB/H AND 265.16 T/YR TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND BASE IS LIMITED TO 6.85 LB/H

AND 30.0 T/YR

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV. EACH Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV. EACH Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.5500 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 2.4100 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: UnknownDid factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown

Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN, EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.6600 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 2.8900 T/YR EACH Standard Emission:Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown

Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0900 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.3900 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0200 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.0900 T/YR EACH Standard Emission:Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown

Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: RTP CHOPPER NOS 16/17 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.0100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: (2) TWINTEX VACUUM CONVEYING SYSTEM NO 1 & 2, Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0300 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.1300 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: UnknownCase-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case

Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: EXTRUDER/FIBERIZATION SYS FURNACE NO 2 TWINTEX Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.5600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 2.4500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: (9) TWINTEX RAW MATERIAL STORAGE SILOS Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0900 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.1600 T/YR COMBINED Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: AQUEOUS CAUSTIC CONTAINERS Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)CAS Number: PM

Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR LESS THAN Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: COLD SOLVENT CLEANING FACILITY Process Type: 49.008 (Organic Solvent Cleaning & Degreasing (except 49.006)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.6000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 2.7000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements:Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED

Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: SURFACE COATING FACILITY Process Type: 41.999 (Other Surface Coating/Printing/Graphic Arts Sources) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 3.3000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.2200 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant InformationPROCESS NAME: SANDBLAST OPERATION

Process Type: 99.001 (Abrasive Blasting) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.8800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.4000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: TWINTEX VACUUM CONVEYING SYSTEM Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: UnspecifiedPollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) )

Emission Limit 1: 0.0300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.1200 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: THERMOPLASTIC EXTRUDER/FIBERIZATION SYSTEM FURN 5 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.8100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency:Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: BATCH BLENDER Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.2800 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s):Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV

Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: (2) STORAGE A & B, FURNACE NO 5 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0500 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.2000 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonIncremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV, EACH Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV, EACH Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FURNACE NO 5

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: NAT GAS Throughput:

Process Notes: FURNACE NO 5 SHALL NOT OPERATE AFTER DECEMBER 31, 2002 UNTIL IT IS CONVERTED TO OPERATE USING AN OXY-FUEL

PROCESS. ASSUMED THE FURNACE TO BE A REGEN. FURN. FOR TEXTILE-TYPE FIBER MANUFACTURE FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSIGNING AN SCC CODE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: UnspecifiedTest Method: Unspecified

Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 18.4600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 80.8600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) ESP & SCRUBBER Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALSO LIMITED TO 0.024 GR/DSCF

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 16.6300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 72.8400 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) ESP & SCRUBBER Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: UNITL DEC 31, 2002 FURNACE 5 IS ALLOWED A MAX HOURLY NOX EMISSION RATE OF 65.79 LB/H AND A MAX ANNUAL NOX EMISSION RATE OF 288.16 T/YR.

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5CAS Number: 7446-09-5

Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 11.4000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 49.9400 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) ESP & SCRUBBER Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 10.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 10.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)CAS Number: VOC

Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.5000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 2.2000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 1.3000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 5.6800 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant InformationPROCESS NAME: (5) HOT AIR DRYERS, FURNACE NO 5

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2200 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.9600 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.4900 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 2.1300 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATEDControl Method: (N) NONE INDICATED

Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.0400 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.7900 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 3.4600 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements:Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED

Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0300 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.1300 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS LIMITED TO 333.3 LB/H AND 265.16 T/YR

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIPControl Method: (N) NONE INDICATED

Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: HOT AIR DRYER NO 6, FURNACE 5 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.0500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOCTest Method: Unspecified

Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.1300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED PROCESSES ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS 'TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS'. TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS ARE LIMITED TO 333.33 LB/H AND 265.16 T/YR. TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND BASE IS LIMITED TO 6.85 LB/H AND 30.0 T/YR

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon MonoxideCAS Number: 630-08-0

Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.7900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 3.4600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)CAS Number: 10102

Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.8200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 3.5900 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FOREHEARTH MONITOR, FURNACE NO 5 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIPControl Method: (N) NONE INDICATED

Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.5300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.7000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 3.0700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements:Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED

Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0400 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 1.3500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 5.9100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements:Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED

Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0900 LB/H LESS THAN Emission Limit 2: 0.3900 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED PROCESSES ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS 'TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS'. TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS ARE LIMITED TO 333.33 LB/H AND 265.16 T/YR.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: CURING OVEN NO 1 & 2 FURNACE NO 5 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)CAS Number: PM

Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.1500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.7000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 3.0700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon MonoxideCAS Number: 630-08-0

Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.6100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN Emission Limit 2: 0.0400 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED PROCESSES ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS 'TOTAL SIZE COMPOUNDS FOR VOC'. TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS LIMITED TO 333.3 LB/H AND 265.16 T/YR.

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)CAS Number: VE

Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: BOILER NO 3 Process Type: 13.310 (Natural Gas (includes propane and liquefied petroleum gas)) Primary Fuel: NAT GAS Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.2000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.3600 T/YR Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-CaseOther Applicable Requirements:

Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.1200 T/YR Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: NSPS Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 2.2900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 10.0100 T/YR Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-CaseOther Applicable Requirements:

Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.5700 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 2.5000 T/YR Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/AOther Applicable Requirements: SIP

Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: DIESEL GENERATOR Process Type: 19.800 (Misc. Internal Combustion Engines) Primary Fuel: DIESEL Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.6100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.3900 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)CAS Number: 10102

Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 55.3700 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 13.5400 T/YR Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.9300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.2300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)CAS Number: VE

Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.4800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.3600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon MonoxideCAS Number: 630-08-0

Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 12.6900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 3.1000 T/YR Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: LINE NO. 5 FORMING MACHINE Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 5.5000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 24.1100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements:Control Method: (A) SCRUBBER

Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) SCRUBBERS Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: SEE POLLUTNAT NOTES Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements:Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED

Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED PROCESSES ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS 'TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS'. TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS ARE LIMITED TO 333.33 LB/H AND 265.16 T/YR.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: (5) FUGITIVES

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: MATERIAL SIZING AREA, SIZE STAGING AREA NO 1 & 2, SIZE STAGING AREAS NO 3 & 4, FURNACE NO 5, WASTEWATER

PRETREATMENT. FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE ONLY.

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: SEE POLLUTANT NOTES Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED EPNS ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS 'TOTAL SIZE COMPUNT VOCS' FOR THEPollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED EPNS ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS 'TOTAL SIZE COMPUNT VOCS' FOR THE FURNACES 1 THROUGH 5 MANUFACTURING LINES. TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS ARE LIMITED TO 333.33 LB/H AND 265.16 T/YR.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FURNACE NO 5 TWINTEX TP EXTRUDER/FIBER. SYSTEM Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.8100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: TWINTEX RAW MATERIAL STORAGE Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel:Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Facility Information

RBLC ID: 

## TX-0362 (final) Date Determination Last Updated: 01/04/2005 Corporate/Company Name: VETROTEX AMERICA Permit Number: PSD-TX-784

Facility Name: VETROTEX AMERICA Permit Date: 03/22/2000 (actual) Facility Contact: MR. CARLOS DAVIS FRS Number: 110000460126 Facility Description: THE PLANT PRODUCES FIBER GLASS REINFORCEMENT PRODUCTS. FIBER GLASS

MANUFACTURING IS BASICALLY THE HIGH- TEMPERATURE MELTING OF PARTICULAR RAW MATERIALS INTO MOLTEN GLASS THAT ARE FURTHER CONVERTED INTO GLASS FIBER STRAND. THE STRAND IS USED TO PRODUCE SEVERAL REINFORCEMENT PRODUCTS. VETROTEX PRODUCES THREE DISTINCT TYPES OF FIBER GLASS PRODUCT; SPOOLED, CHOPPED, AND TWINTEX. SIC Code: 3211Permit Type: D: Both B (Add new process to existing facility) &C (Modify process at existing facility) NAICS Code: 327211

Permit URL: EPA Region: 6 COUNTRY: USA Facility County: WICHITA Facility State: TX Facility ZIP Code: 76310 Permit Issued By: TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (TCEQ) (Agency Name)

MR. JOHNNY VERMILLION(Agency Contact) (512) 239-1292 John.Vermillion@tceq.texas.gov Other Agency Contact Info: STEPHANIE HOWELL PO BOX 13087 SUSTIN, TX 78711-3087 512-239-1560 Permit Notes: ON 9/24/1973, VETROTEX OBTAINED AUTHORIZATION TO CONSTRUCT FURNACES 1 AND 2 PLUS ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT THROUGH PERMIT NO. 1346. FURNACES 3 AND 4 PLUS ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT WERE LATER AUTHORIZED UNDER PERMIT NUMBER 5667, ISSUED 9/1/1977. AUTHORIZATION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF FURNACE 5 PLUS ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT WAS GRANTED 10/4/1991 WITH PERMIT NOS. 20349 AND PSD-TX-784. THE ORIGINAL FURNACE 5 PROJECT TRIGGERED A PSD REVIEW FOR NOX AND PM EMISSIONS. ON 5/21/1997, VETROTEX'S THREE STATE PERMITS WERE CONSOLIDATED INTO PERMIT NO. 5667, RESULTING IN THE CURRENT PERMIT STATUS. AS PART OF THE 1995 RENEWAL OF PERMIT NO. 1346, VETROTEX WAS REQUIRED TO PERFORM SAMPLING AND/OR TESTING FOR THE CHEMICAL APPLICATION PROCESS ASSOCIATED WITH FURNACES 1 AND 2 VOC EMISSIONS. ON 6/30/1998 VETROTEX SUBMITTED AN AMENDMENT APPLICATION FOR RECONCILIATION OF PERMIT NOS. 5667 AND PSD-TX-784 TO ADD THE SIZING-RELATED VOC CHARACTERS AND VOC EMISSIONS DISCOVERED DURING TESTING. A PSD APPLICABILITY ANALYSIS WAS INCLUDED WITH THE DETERMINATION THAT A PSD REVIEW FOR VOCS SHOULD HAVE BEEN TRIGGERED WITH THE ORIGINAL FURNACE 5 PROJECT. SINCE CONSTRUCTION OF FURNACES 1 THROUGH 4 COMMENCED PRIOR TO MARCH 1, 1998, PSD WAS NOT APPLICABLE FOR THE RECONCILED VOC EMISSIONS FROM THOSE FURNACES. Affected Boundaries: Boundary Type: Class 1 Area State: Boundary: Distance: CLASS1 OK Wichita Mountains < 100 km



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: SILO ENTRY A

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: SILO ENTRY A INCLUDES 10 SILOS. EMISSIONS WERE LISTED IN THE PERMIT AS SILO BAGHOUSE BUT ARE REORGANIZED HERE

TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE BAGHOUSE IS A CONTROL DEVICE. EMISSION POINT NUMBERS INCLUDED IN THIS ENTRY ARE: E-1, E- 2, E-3, E-4, E-5, E-6, E-7A, E-7B, E-8, AND E-9.POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0700 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.3200 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSES Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED IN PERMIT AS PM/PM10.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: SILO ENTRY B

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EMISSIONS FOR 2 SILOS ARE INCLUDED IN THIS ENTRY, EMISSION POINT NOS. E-2A AND E-3A. EMISSIONS IN THE PERMIT WERE

LISTED UNDER SILO BAGHOUSES, BUT ARE REORGANIZED HERE TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE BAGHOUSE IS A CONTROL DEVICE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1400 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.6100 T/YR EACHStandard Emission:

Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED IN PERMIT AS PM/PM10.

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV, EACH Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV, EACH Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: SILO ENTRY C

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel:Throughput:

Process Notes: THIS ENTRY INCLUDES EMISSIONS FOR TWO SILOS, EMISSION POINT NUMBERS E-10 AND E-11. EMISSIONS ARE LISTED UNDER

SILO BAGHOUSES IN THE PERMIT, BUT ARE REORGANIZED HERE TO REFLECT THAT THE BAGHOUSE IS A CONTROL DEVICE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1200 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.5100 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS IN THE PERMIT ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: BATCH BLENDER ENTRY A

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EMISSIONS FOR 4 EMISSION POINTS ARE LISTED IN THIS ENTRY: EMISSION POINT NUMBERS; E-15, E-15A, E-16, AND E-16A.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1600 LB/H EACHEmission Limit 2: 0.7200 T/YR EACH

Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS IN THE PERMIT ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: SCALE 5

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EMISSIONS IN THE PERMIT ARE LISTED UNDER SCALE 5 BAGHOUSE, BUT ARE REORGANIZED HERE TO DEMONSTRATE THAT

THE BAGHOUSE IS A CONTROL DEVICE. EMISSION POINT NO. E-17.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0800 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonCost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FURNACES NO. 1

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EMISSION POINT E-21A. EMISSIONS IN THE PERMIT ARE LISTED UNDER FURNACE NO. 1 ESP AND SCRUBBER BUT ARE

REORGANIZED HERE TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE ESP AND SCRUBBER ARE CONTROL DEVICES. ASSUMED THAT THE FURNACE IS A REGEN. FURNACE (WOOL-TYPE FIBER) (SCC CODE 30501201) FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS DATABASE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 13.6800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 59.9300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) SCRUBBER FOLLOWED BY AN ESP. ABATEMENT EQUIPMENT WILL BE BYPASSED FOR MAINTENANCE FOR NO MORE THAN 286 H/YR. Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS WERE LISTED IN PERMIT AS PM/PM10.

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)CAS Number: VOC

Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.0700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 13.8700 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 60.7500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)CAS Number: 7446-09-5

Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 20.3100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 88.9600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) SCRUBBER FOLLOWED BY AN ESP. ABATEMENT EQUIPMENT WILL BE BYPASSED FOR MAINTENANCE NO MORE THAN 286 H/YR. Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: FACILITY NETTED OUT OF PSD REVIEW FOR SO2.

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.7100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)CAS Number: VE

Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 20.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 20.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) SCRUBBER FOLLOWED BY AN ESP. Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FURNACE NO. 2

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN E-22A. EMISSIONS ARE LISTED UNDER FURNACE NO.2 ESP AND SCRUBBER, BUT ARE REORGANIZED HERE TO REFLECT

THAT THE SCRUBBER AND ESP ARE CONTROL DEVICES.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 13.6800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 59.9300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: UnknownCase-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD

Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) SCRUBBER AND AN ESP. ABATEMENT EQUIPMENT WILL BE BYPASSED FOR MAINTENANCE NO MORE THAN 286 H/YR. Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10 IN PERMIT.

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.0700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 7.0900 LB/H SEE NOTES Emission Limit 2: 31.0500 T/YR SEE NOTES Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: UnknownDid factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown

Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: UNTIL 3/31/2003, EPN-E-22A IS ALLOWED A MAXIMUM HOURLY NOX EMISSION RATE OF 28.05 LB/H AND A MAXIMUM ANNUAL NOX EMISSION RATE OF 122.86 T/YR.

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 20.3100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 88.9600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) SCRUBBER AND AN ESP. ABATEMENT EQUIPMENT WILL BE BYPASSED FOR MAINTENANCE NO MORE THAN 286 H/YR. Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: FACILITY NETTED OUT OF PSD REVIEW FOR SO2.

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.7100 T/YRStandard Emission:

Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 20.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 20.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) SCRUBBER AND ESP. Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FURNACE NO. 3

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel:Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN E-23A. EMISSIONS IN PERMIT ARE LISTED UNDER FURNACE NO. 3 ESP AND SCRUBBER BUT ARE REORGANIZED HERE TO

DEMONSTRATE THAT THE ESP AND SCRUBBER ARE CONTROL DEVICES.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 5.4600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 23.9100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) SCRUBBER AND AN ESP. ABATEMENT EQUIPMENT WILL BE BYPASSED FOR MAINTENANCE NO MORE THAN 144 H/YR. Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS WERE LISTED IN PERMIT AS PM/PM10.

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 6.6600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 29.1700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) SCRUBBER AND AN ESP. ABATEMENT EQUIPMENT WILL BE BYPASSED FOR MAINTENANCE NO MORE THAN 144 H/YR. Est. % Efficiency:Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: THE FACILITY NETTED OUT OF PSD REVIEW.

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 11.4600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 50.1900 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.7600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 3.3300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency:Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.2300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 20.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 20.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) SCRUBBER AND ESP. Est. % Efficiency:Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FURNACE NO. 4

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN E-24A. EMISSIONS IN PERMIT ARE LISTED UNDER FURNACE NO. 4 ESP AND SCRUBBER BUT ARE REARRANGED HERE TO

DEMONSTRATE THAT THE EPN AND SCRUBBER ARE CONTROL DEVICES.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 5.0800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 22.2500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) SCRUBBER AND AN ESP. ABATEMENT EQUIPMENT WILL BE BYPASSED FOR MAINTENANCE NO MORE THAN 286 H/YR. Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: THE EMISSIONS IN THE PERMIT WERE LISTED AS PM/PM10.

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5CAS Number: 7446-09-5

Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 9.0300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 39.5500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) SCRUBBER AND AN ESP. ABATEMENT EQUIPMENT WILL BE BYPASSED FOR MAINTENANCE NO MORE THAN 286 H/YR. Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: THE FACILITY NETTED OUT OF PSD REVIEW FOR SO2.

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 7.8800 LB/H SEE NOTES Emission Limit 2: 34.5100 T/YR SEE NOTES Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: UNTIL 3/31/2001, EPN E-24A IS ALLOWED A MAXIMUM HOURLY NOX EMISSION RATE OF 31.16 LB/H AND A MAXIMUM ANNUAL NOX EMISSION RATE OF 136.48 T/YR.POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.5200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 2.2800 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.1400 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 20.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 20.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) SCRUBBER AND ESP. Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: BATCH HOLD BIN ENTRY A

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: 2 BATCH HOLD BINS ARE INCLUDED IN THIS ENTRY; EPN E-25 AND E-26. EMISSIONS IN THE PERMIT ARE LISTED UNDER BATCH

HOLD BIN NO.1 AND NO.2 BAGHOUSE, BUT ARE REARRANGED HERE TO REFLECT THAT THE BAGHOUSE IS A CONTROL DEVICE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2500 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 1.0700 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: UnknownDid factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown

Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS IN THE PERMIT ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: BATCH HOLD BIN ENTRY B

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: TWO EPNS ARE INCLUDED IN THIS ENTRY, E-27A AND E-28. EMISSIONS IN THE PERMIT ARE LISTED UNDER BATCH HOLD BIN

NO. 3A BAGHOUSE AND BATCH HOLD BIN NO.4 BAGHOUSE, BUT HAVE BEEN REORGANIZED HERE TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE BAGHOUSE IS A CONTROL DEVICE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2500 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 1.0700 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSES Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonCompliance Verified: Unknown

Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS IN THE PERMIT ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10.

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: BATCH HOLD BIN ENTRY C

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EMISSIONS FOR EPN-27B ARE LISTED UNDER BATCH HOLD BIN NO. 3B BAGHOUSE, BUT HAVE BEEN REARRANGED HERE TO

DEMONSTRATE THAT THE BAGHOUSE IS A CONTROL DEVICE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) )Emission Limit 1: 0.2500 LB/H

Emission Limit 2: 1.0700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: CLEANING OVEN Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033))Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN E-30.

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.4000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: HOT AIR DRYERS ENTRY A Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: SIX HOT AIR DRYERS ARE INCLUDED IN THIS ENTRY; EPNS E-31 A- F, E-32 A-F, E-33 A-D, E-34 A-D, E-35 A-D AND E-36 A-D.

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 20.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AVEmission Limit 2:

Standard Emission: 20.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (P) USE OF PIPELINE QUALITY NATURAL GAS. Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0300 LB/H EACH, SEE NOTES Emission Limit 2: 0.1300 T/YR EACH, SEE NOTES Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EXPLANATION OF ADDITIONAL VOC EMISSION LIMITS: FOR EACH DRYER, ALL EPNS LISTED IN THE PROCESS NOTES ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS "TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND" VOCS FOR THE FURNACES 1 THROUGH 5 MANUFACTURING LINES. THE VOC EMISSIONS FROM COMBUSTION FROM THESE SOURCES, IF ANY, ARE LISTED SEPARATELY ABOVE. "TOTAL SIZE COMPOUNDS" ARE LIMITED TO 321.89 LB/H AND 243.07 T/YR.

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102Test Method: Unspecified

Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.9300 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 4.0700 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 5.0200 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 21.9900 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PMTest Method: Unspecified

Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.7100 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 3.1100 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) USE OF PIPELINE QUALITY SWEET NATURAL GAS. Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS IN PERMIT ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10.

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN, EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) USE OF PIPELINE QUALITY SWEET NATURAL GAS. Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: FACILITY NETTED OUT OF PSD REVIEW FOR SO2.



## Process/Pollutant InformationPROCESS NAME: DIELECTRIC OVEN NO. 38

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN E-38 A-J

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.6600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) ELECTRICITY IS USED INSTEAD OF FOSSIL FUELS. Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10.

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 321.8900 LB/H SEE NOTES Emission Limit 2: 243.0700 T/YR SEE NOTES Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATEDEst. % Efficiency:

Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED EPNS ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS 'TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS' FOR THE FURNACES 1 THROUGH 5 MANUFACTURING LINES. THE VOC EMISSIONS FROM COMBUSTION FROM THESE SOURCES, IF ANY, ARE LISTED SEPARATELY FOR EACH EMISSION POINT.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: RTP DRYER NO. 15

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN E-39 IS LISTED IN THE PERMIT AS RTP DRYER NO. 15 BAGHOUSE. EMISSIONS INFORMATION HAS BEEN REORGANIZED TO

DEMONSTRATE THAT THE BAGHOUSE IS A CONTROL DEVICE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.4500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED IN THE PERMIT AS PM/PM10.POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR LESS THAN Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) PIPELINE QUALITY SWEET NATURAL GAS Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: THE FACILITY NETTED OUT OF PSD REVIEW FOR SO2.

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.4500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.2200 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H SEE NOTES Emission Limit 2: 0.0400 T/YR SEE NOTES Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED EPNS ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS 'TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS' FOR THE FURNACES 1 THROUGH 5 MANUFACTURING LINES. THE VOC EMISSIONS FROM COMBUSTION FROM THESE SOURCES, IF ANY, ARE LISTED SEPARATELY FOR EACH EMISSION POINT ABOVE.POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: MAT LINE (DRYERS AND CLEANER) Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN E-41 A-E.

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.4500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.9700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: UnknownCase-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD

Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) PIPELINE QUALITY SWEET NATURAL GAS Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: FACILITY NETTED OUT OF PSD REVIEW FOR SO2.

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.6600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: UnknownCase-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case

Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 20.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 20.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (P) PIPELINE QUALITY SWEET NATURAL GAS AND GOOD ENGINEERING PRACTICES. Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.3200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 5.7800 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: UnknownCase-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD

Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) PIPELINE QUALITY SWEET NATURAL GAS AND GOOD ENGINEERING PRACTICES. Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10 IN THE PERMIT

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0900 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: DIELECTRIC DRYER ENTRY A Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: THIS ENTRY INCLUDES EMISSIONS FOR TWO EPNS, E-42 A & B, AND E-43 A & B.POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1100 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.4800 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 321.8900 LB/H SEE NOTES Emission Limit 2: 243.0700 T/YR SEE NOTES Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED EPNS ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS 'TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS' FOR THE FURNACES 1 THROUGH 5 MANUFACTURING LINES.POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 20.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 20.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: HOT AIR DRYER NO. 45 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN E-45 A-D

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0400 LB/H SEE NOTES Emission Limit 2: 0.1800 T/YR SEE NOTES Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSDOther Applicable Requirements:

Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED EPNS ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS 'TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS' FOR THE FURNACES 1 THROUGH 5 MANUFACTURING LINES. THE VOC EMISSIONS FROM COMBUSTION FROM THESE SOURCES ARE LISTED SEPARATELY ABOVE FOR EACH EMISSION POINT. THE COMBINED LIMIT IS: 321.89 LB/H AND 243.07 T/YR.

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 20.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 20.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (P) PIPELINE QUALITY SWEET NATURAL GAS, GOOD ENGINEERING PRACTICES. Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.7100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 3.1100 T/YR Standard Emission:Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown

Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) PIPELINE QUALITY SWEET NATURAL GAS, GOOD ENGINEERING PRACTICES. Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED IN THE PERMIT AS PM/PM10.

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN Emission Limit 2: 0.0200 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) PIPELINE QUALITY SWEET NATURAL GAS Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: FACILITY NETTED OUT OF PSD REVIEW FOR SO2.

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.3300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 5.8300 T/YR Standard Emission:Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown

Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 5.0200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 21.9900 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: BOILER NO. 2

Process Type: 19.600 (Misc. Boilers, Furnaces, Heaters) Primary Fuel: Throughput:Process Notes: *SCC CODE WAS CHOSEN FOR PURPOSES OF THIS DATABASE AND CANNOT BE VERIFIED. PERMIT INDICATES THAT THROUGHPUT INFORMATION REGARDING THE BOILER IS IN A CLASSIFIED FILE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 3.4000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 7.4500 T/YR Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.8500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.8600 T/YR Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: UnknownPollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0700 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.1500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0900 T/YR Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: NSPS Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: UnknownPollutant/Compliance Notes: FACILITY NETTED OUT OF PSD REVIEW FOR SO2.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.2700 T/YR Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: EMERGENCY GENERATOR ENTRY A

Process Type: 19.800 (Misc. Internal Combustion Engines) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: TWO EMERGENCY GENERATORS, EPNS E-61 A-D AND E-62 A-D ARE INCLUDED IN THIS ENTRY. THE FUEL TYPE OR SIZE IS

NOT SPECIFIED.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.2100 LB/H EACHEmission Limit 2: 0.0800 T/YR EACH

Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS IN THE PERMIT ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10.

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.6500 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.1100 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 50.7700 LB/H EACHEmission Limit 2: 3.4000 T/YR EACH

Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 5.5100 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.3700 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: FACILITY NETTED OUT OF PSD REVIEW FOR SO2.

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 12.0100 LB/H EACHEmission Limit 2: 0.8000 T/YR EACH

Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: PROPANE FLARE Process Type: 19.390 (Other Flares) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN E-71.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0200 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonCompliance Verified: Unknown

Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 13.2800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.3300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 3.6500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.3700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonCompliance Verified: Unknown

Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 7.2900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.7300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.4900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonCompliance Verified: Unknown

Pollutant/Compliance Notes: FACILITY NETTED OUT OF PSD REVIEW FOR SO2.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FUEL FUGITIVES AND DIESEL STORAGE TANK

Process Type: 19.900 (Other Misc. Combustion) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE ONLY. ASSUMED THE DIESEL IS USED FOR THE EMERGENCY GENERATOR WHEN

ASSIGNING THE SCC CODE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 3.0600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 13.4200 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: NSPS Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: PROPANE EVAPORATOR NO 1 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033))Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN E-75A

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR LESS THAN Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10.

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR LESS THAN Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonIncremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR LESS THAN Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonIncremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: FACILITY NETTED OUT OF PSD REVIEW FOR SO2.

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: PROPANE EVAPORATOR ENTRY B Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: THIS ENTRY INCLUDES EPNS E-75B, E-75C, AND E-75 D, PROPANE EVAPORATORS NOS. 2, 3 AND 4.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0200 LB/H EACHEmission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR LESS THAN, EACH

Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED IN THE PERMIT AS PM/PM10.

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR LESS THAN, EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3100 LB/H EACHEmission Limit 2: 0.0800 T/YR EACH

Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN, EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR LESS THAN, EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: FACILIY NETTED OUT OF PSD REVIEW FOR SO2.

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0400 LB/HEmission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR

Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FORMING LINE NO. 1

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: ASSUMED TEXTILE-TYPE FIBER FORMED WHEN ASSIGNING THE SCC CODE. EMISSIONS ARE LISTED IN THE PERMIT UNDER

FORMING LINE SCRUBBERS BUT HAVE BEEN REORGANIZED HERE TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE SCRUBBERS ARE A CONTROL DEVICE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 2.6200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 11.4600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) SCRUBBER Est. % Efficiency:Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS IN THE PERMIT ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10.

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 321.8900 LB/H SEE NOTE Emission Limit 2: 243.0700 T/YR SEE NOTE Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) USE OF WATER-BASED INSTEAD OF SOLVENT-BASED SIZING MATERIALS Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED EPNS ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS FOR THE FURNACES 1 THROUGH 5 MANUFACTURING LINES.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FORMING LINE NO. 2

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: ASSUMED TEXTILE-TYPE FIBER FORMED WHEN ASSIGNING THE SCC CODE. ENTRY INCLUDES EPN E-82 AND E-85B. EMISSIONS

ARE LISTED AS FORMING LINE NO. 2 SCRUBBERS, BUT HAVE BEEN REORGANIZED HERE TO DEMONSTRATE THAT SCRUBBERS ARE A CONTROL DEVICE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)CAS Number: VOC

Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 321.8900 LB/H SEE NOTE Emission Limit 2: 243.0700 T/YR SEE NOTE Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) USE OF WATER-BASED INSTEAD OF SOLVENT-BASED SIZING MATERIALS Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED EPNS ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS FOR THE FURNACES 1 THROUGH 5 MANUFACTURING LINES.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 2.3200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 10.1400 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) SCRUBBER Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED IN THE PERMIT AS PM/PM10.

## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FORMING LINE NO. 3

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: ASSUMED TEXTILE-TYPE FIBER FORMED WHEN ASSIGNING THE SCC CODE. ENTRY INCLUDES EMISSION POINT NOS. E-83 AND

E-86 A&B. EMISSIONS ARE LISTED UNDER FORMING LINE NO. 3 SCRUBBERS, BUT HAVE BEEN REORGANIZED HERE TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE SCRUBBERS ARE A CONTROL DEVICE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 321.8900 LB/H SEE NOTE Emission Limit 2: 243.0700 T/YR SEE NOTE Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) USE OF WATER-BASED INSTEAD OF SOLVENT-BASED SIZING MATERIAL. Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED EPNS ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS FOR THE FURNACES 1 THROUGH 5 MANUFACTURING LINES.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 3.9800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 17.4600 T/YRStandard Emission:

Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) SCRUBBER Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10 IN PERMIT.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FORMING LINE NO. 4

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: ASSUMED TEXTILE-TYPE FIBER FORMED WHEN ASSIGNING THE SCC CODE. ENTRY INCLUDES EPN E-84. EMISSIONS WERE

LISTED UNDER FORMING LINE NO. 4 SCRUBBER, BUT HAVE BEEN REORGANIZED TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE SCRUBBER IS A CONTROL DEVICE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 321.8900 LB/H SEE NOTE Emission Limit 2: 243.0700 T/YR SEE NOTE Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) USE OF WATER-BASED INSTEAD OF SOLVENT-BASED SIZING MATERIALS Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonIncremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED EPNS ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS FOR THE FURNACES 1 THROUGH 5 MANUFACTURING LINES.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 2.7300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 11.9500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) SCRUBBER Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED UNDER PM/PM10.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FURNACE FOREHEARTH ENTRY A Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: ENTRY INCLUDES EPNS E-91 AND E-92, FURNACE NO. 1 FOREHEARTH AND FURNACE NO. 2 FOREHEARTH.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) )Emission Limit 1: 0.0300 LB/H EACH

Emission Limit 2: 0.1300 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10 IN PERMIT

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0200 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.0700 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) )Emission Limit 1: 0.8100 LB/H EACH

Emission Limit 2: 3.5600 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.0400 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: FACILITY NETTED OUT OF PSD REVIEW FOR SO2.

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds )Emission Limit 1: 0.2000 LB/H EACH

Emission Limit 2: 0.8900 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FURNACE FOREHEARTH NO. 3 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: ENTRY INCLUDES EPN E-93, FURNACE NO. 3 FOREHEARTH.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0700 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.3100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonIncremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN Emission Limit 2: 0.0200 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: FACILITY NETTED OUT OF PSD REVIEW FOR SO2

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.5900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 2.6000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonIncremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.5500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.1400 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonIncremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FURNACE FOREHEARTH NO. 4 AND RTP CHOPPER

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN E-94. THE EMISSIONS ARE LISTED UNDER FURNACE NO. 4 FOREHEARTH AND RTP CHOPPER BAGHOUSES, BUT ARE

REORGANIZED HERE TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE BAGHOUSES ARE A CONTROL DEVICE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.4900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 2.1500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS IN THE PERMIT ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10.

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: UnspecifiedPollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) )

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN Emission Limit 2: 0.0400 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: FACILITY NETTED OUT OF PSD REVIEW FOR SO2.

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.8100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 3.5600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: UnspecifiedPollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds )

Emission Limit 1: 0.2000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.8900 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NO. 1 SCALES BATCH BLENDERPROCESS

NAME: NO. 1 SCALES BATCH BLENDER

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN E-95. EMISSIONS IN THE PERMIT ARE LISTED UNDER NO. 1 SCALES BATCH BLENDER BAGHOUSE, BUT HAVE BEEN

REORGANIZED HERE TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE BAGHOUSE IS A CONTROL DEVICE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.2800 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS IN THE PERMIT ARE LISTED UNDER PM/PM10.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: NO. 1 REJECT BATCH TANK

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN E-97. EMISSIONS IN THE PERMIT ARE LISTED UNDER NO. 1 REJECT BATCH TANK BAGHOUSE, BUT HAVE BEEN

REORGANIZED HERE TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE BAGHOUSE IS A CONTROL DEVICE.POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.2800 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS IN THE PERMIT ARE LISTED UNDER PM/PM10.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: HOT AIR DRYER NO. 98 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN E-98 A-D

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.9300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 4.0700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSDOther Applicable Requirements:

Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) PIPELINE QUALITY SWEET NATURAL GAS Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: FACILITY NETTED OUT OF PSD REVIEW FOR SO2.

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 5.0200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 21.9900 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-CaseOther Applicable Requirements:

Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0300 LB/H SEE NOTE Emission Limit 2: 0.1300 T/YR SEE NOTE Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED EPNS ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS FOR THE FURNACES 1 THROUGH 5 MANUFACTURING LINES. THE VOC EMISSIONS FROM COMBUSTION FROM THIS SOURCE ARE LISTED ABOVE. TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS ARE LIMITED TO 321.89 LB/H AND 243.07 T/YR.

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 20.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 20.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AVDid factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown

Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (P) USE OF PIPELINE QUALITY SWEET NATURAL GAS AND GOOD ENGINEERING PRACTICES. Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.7100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 3.1100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) USE OF PIPELINE QUALITY SWEET NATURAL GAS AND GOOD ENGINEERING PRACTICES. Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED IN THE PERMIT AS PM/PM10



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: RTP DRYERS ENTRY A

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:Process Notes: EPNS 3-99, E-100, E-112, AND E-113. EMISSIONS ARE LISTED UNDER RTP DRYER NO. (10, 11, 12, 13) BAGHOUSE, BUT HAVE BEEN REORGANIZED HERE TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE BAGHOUSE IS A CONTROL DEVICE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3300 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 1.4500 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0500 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.2200 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: UnknownPollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H EACH, SEE NOTE Emission Limit 2: 0.0400 T/YR EACH, EACH NOTE Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED EPNS ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS FOR THE FURNACES 1 THROUGH 5 MANUFACTURING LINES. THE VOC EMISSIONS FROM COMBUSTION FROM THIS SOURCE ARE LISTED ABOVE. TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS ARE LIMITED TO 321.89 LB/H AND 243.07 T/YR.

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV, EACH Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV, EACH Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonIncremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3300 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 1.4500 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS IN PERMIT ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10.

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN, EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR LESS THAN, EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonIncremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: FACILITY NETTED OUT OF PSD REVIEW FOR SO2.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: DIELECTRIC OVEN NO. 101 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN E-101

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 321.8900 LB/H SEE NOTE Emission Limit 2: 243.0700 T/YR SEE NOTE Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED EPNS ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS FOR THE FURNACES 1 THROUGH 5 MANUFACTURING LINES.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) )Emission Limit 1: 0.0800 LB/H

Emission Limit 2: 0.3500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) USE OF ELECTRICITY RATHER THAN A FOSSIL FUEL Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED IN PERMIT AS PM/PM10



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: POST CURING OVEN NO. 1 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN E-105

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR LESS THAN Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonIncremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0900 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0900 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonIncremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR LESS THAN Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: FACILITY NETTED OUT OF PSD REVIEW FOR SO2

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0200 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonIncremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: POST CURING OVENS NOS. 2 & 3 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPNS E-106 AND E-107

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN, EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR LESS THAN, EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN, EACHEmission Limit 2: 0.0200 T/YR EACH

Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN, EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR LESS THAN, EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: FACILITY NETTED OUT OF PSD REVIEW FOR SO2

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0200 LB/H EACHEmission Limit 2: 0.0200 T/YR EACH

Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1000 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.4200 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: PNEUMATIC TRANSFER HOLD TANK

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033))Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN 109. EMISSIONS IN PERMIT WERE LISTED UNDER PNEUMATIC TRANSFER HOLD TANK BAGHOUSE, BUT WERE RENAMED

HERE TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE BAGHOUSE IS A CONTROL DEVICE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.0100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10 IN THE PERMIT.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: RTP DRYERS ENTRY B

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: ENTRY INCLUDES EPNS E-116, E-117, AND E-118. EMISSIONS ARE LISTED UNDER RTP DRYER NO. (16, 17, 18) BAGHOUSE IN THE

PERMIT, BUT HAVE BEEN RENAMED HERE TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE BAGHOUSE IS A CONTROL DEVICE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: UnspecifiedPollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) )

Emission Limit 1: 0.5500 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 2.4100 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (B) BAGHOUSE, USE OF PIPELINE QUALITY SWEET NATURAL GAS Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10.

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN, EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) USE OF PIPELINE QUALITY SWEET NATURAL GAS Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: UnspecifiedPollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds )

Emission Limit 1: 0.0900 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.3900 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0200 LB/H EACH, SEE NOTE Emission Limit 2: 0.0900 T/YR EACH, SEE NOTE Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED EPNS ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS FOR THE FURNACES 1 THROUGH 5 MANUFACTURING LINES. THE VOC EMISSIONS FROM COMBUSTION FROM THIS SOURCE ARE LISTED ABOVE. TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS ARE LIMITED TO 321.89 LB/H AND 243.07 T/YR.

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)CAS Number: VE

Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV, EACH Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV, EACH Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.6600 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 2.8900 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant InformationPROCESS NAME: RR UNLOADING AREA VACUUM CLEANING SYSTEM

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN E-115

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10 IN THE PERMIT.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: RTP CHOPPER NOS. 16/17

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN E-119. EMISSIONS ARE LISTED UNDER RTP CHOPPER NOS. 16/17 BAGHOUSE IN THE PERMIT, BUT ARE RENAMED HERE TO

DEMONSTRATE THAT THE BAGHOUSE IS A CONTROL DEVICE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)CAS Number: PM

Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.0100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: TWINTEX VACUUM CONVEYING SYSTEMS Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPNS E-121 AND E-122.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0300 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.1300 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FURNACE NO. 2 TWINTEX EXTRUDER/FIBERIZATION SYSTEM Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN E-123

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)CAS Number: VOC

Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.5600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 2.4500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: TWINTEX RAW MATERIAL STORAGE SILOS P-1 THROUGH P-9

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: INCLUDES EPNS: E-124, E-125, E-126, E-127, E-128, E-527, E- 528, AND E-529. EMISSIONS ARE LISTED UNDER TWINTEX RAW

MATERIAL STORAGE SILO P-(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 BAGHOUSES, BUT HAVE BEEN RENAMED HERE TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE BAGHOUSE IS A CONTROL DEVICE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0900 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.1600 T/YR COMBINED Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: UnknownCase-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD

Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: AQUEOUS CAUSTIC CONTAINERS Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN E-148 A&B

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR LESS THAN Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10.

## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: COLD SOLVENT CLEANING FACILITY Process Type: 49.008 (Organic Solvent Cleaning & Degreasing (except 49.006)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN E-149

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.6000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 2.7000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: SURFACE COATING FACILITY Process Type: 41.999 (Other Surface Coating/Printing/Graphic Arts Sources) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN E-151

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)CAS Number: VOC

Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 3.3000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.2200 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: SANDBLAST OPERATION Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN E-152

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.8800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.4000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements:Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED

Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: TWINTEX VACUUM CONVEYING SYSTEM ENTRY B Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN E-524

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.1200 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10.



## Process/Pollutant InformationPROCESS NAME: FURNACE NO. 5 TWINTEX EXTRUDER/ FIBERIZATION SYST

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN E-525. ASSUMED THE PROCESS FORMED TEXTILE-TYPE FIBER FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSIGNING AN SCC CODE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.8100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: BATCH BLENDER ENTRY B Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPNS F-510 A&B. EMISSIONS FROM EPN F510 A & F510B SHALL NOT OCCUR SIMULTANEOUSLY.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: UnspecifiedPollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) )

Emission Limit 1: 0.0600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.2800 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS FURNACE NO. 5 STORAGE A & BPROCESS

NAME: FURNACE NO. 5 STORAGE A & B

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN F-513 & F-514. EMISSIONS ARE LISTED UNDER FURNACE NO. 5 STORAGE (A & B) BAGHOUSE, BUT HAVE BEEN RENAMED

HERE TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE BAGHOUSE IS A CONTROL DEVICE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV, EACH Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV, EACH Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0500 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.2000 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements:Other Applicable Requirements:

Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FURNACE NO. 5

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN F-515. EMISSIONS ARE LISTED IN THE PERMIT UNDER FURNACE NO. 5 DRY SCRUBBER AND ESP, BUT HAVE BEEN

RENAMED HERE TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE DRY SCRUBBER AND ESP ARE CONTROL DEVICES.

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 20.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 20.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) SCRUBBER AND AN ESP. Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 18.4600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 80.8600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) SCRUBBER AND AN ESP. ABATEMENT EQUPMENT IS BYPASSED FOR MAINTENANCE NO MORE THAN 144 H/YR. Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10.

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.5000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 2.2000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 48.6100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 212.9000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 11.4000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 49.9400 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) SCRUBBER AND AN ESP. ABATEMENT EQUIPMENT IS BYPASSED FOR MAINTENANCE NO MORE THAN 144 H/YR. Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: FACILITY NETTED OUT OF PSD REVIEW FOR SO2.Pollutant/Compliance Notes: FACILITY NETTED OUT OF PSD REVIEW FOR SO2.

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 1.3000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 5.6800 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FURNACE NO. 5 DRYER NOS. 1-5 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: INCLUDES EPNS F-516A-C, F-517 A-C, F-518 A-C, F-519 A-C AND F-520 A-C.

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.7900 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 3.4600 T/YR EACH Standard Emission:Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown

Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0300 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.1300 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED EPNS ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS FOR THE FURNACES 1 THROUGH 5 MANUFACTURING LINES. THE VOC EMISSIONS FROM COMBUSTION FROM THIS SOURCE ARE LISTED ABOVE. TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS ARE LIMITED TO 321.89 LB/H AND 243.07 T/YR.

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV, EACHEmission Limit 2:

Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV, EACH Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2200 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.9600 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10.

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.4900 LB/H EACHEmission Limit 2: 2.1300 T/YR EACH

Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H EACH Emission Limit 2: 0.0400 T/YR EACH Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: THE FACILITY NETTED OUT OF PSD REVIEW FOR SO2.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FURNACE NO. 5 DRYER NO. 6 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel:Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN F-521 A-C

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.1300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED EPNS ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS FOR THE FURNACES 1 THROUGH 5 MANUFACTURING LINES. THE VOC EMISSIONS FROM COMBUSTION FROM THIS SOURCE ARE LISTED ABOVE. TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS ARE LIMITED TO 321.89 LB/H AND 243.07 T/YR.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.0500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency:Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.8200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 3.5900 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency:Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: FACILITY NETTED OUT OF PSD REVIEW

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.7900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 3.4600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FURNACE NO. 5 FOREHEARTH MONITOR Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN F-522.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) )Emission Limit 1: 0.0800 LB/H

Emission Limit 2: 0.3500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10.

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.2000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) )Emission Limit 1: 2.2300 LB/H

Emission Limit 2: 9.7500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.1200 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: FACILITY NETTED OUT OF PSD REVIEW FOR SO2.

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds )Emission Limit 1: 0.5600 LB/H

Emission Limit 2: 2.4400 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FURNACE NO. 5 CURING OVENS NOS. 1 & 2 Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033))Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN F-531

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.1500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.7000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 3.0700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonIncremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: THE FACILITY NETTED OUT OF PSD REVIEW FOR SO2.

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.6100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonIncremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H LESS THAN, SEE NOTES Emission Limit 2: 0.0400 T/YR SEE NOTES Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/tonIncremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED EPNS ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS FOR THE FURNACES 1 THROUGH 5 MANUFACTURING LINES. THE VOC EMISSIONS FROM COMBUSTION FROM THIS SOURCE ARE LISTED ABOVE. TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS ARE LIMITED TO 321.89 LB/H AND 243.07 T/YR.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: BOILER NO. 3

Process Type: 19.600 (Misc. Boilers, Furnaces, Heaters) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: THE FUEL TYPE AND SIZE FOR THIS UNIT WERE NOT PROVIDED. ASSUMED NATURAL GAS AS THE FUEL AND 10-100 MMBTU/H

AS SIZE FOR PURPOSE OF ASSIGNING AN SCC CODE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.2000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)CAS Number: 7446-09-5

Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.1200 T/YR Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: NSPS Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: FACILITY NETTED OUT OF PSD REVIEW FOR SO2.

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.5700 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 2.5000 T/YR Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)CAS Number: VE

Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.3600 T/YR Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)CAS Number: 10102

Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 2.2900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 10.0100 T/YR Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: DIESEL GENERATOR Process Type: 19.800 (Misc. Internal Combustion Engines) Primary Fuel: DIESEL Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN F-537. OPERATION OF THE DIESEL GENERATOR IS LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM OF 489 H/YR.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.6100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.3900 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements:Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED

Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 55.3700 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 13.5400 T/YR Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.9300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.2300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements:Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED

Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: FACILITY NETTED OUT OF PSD REVIEW FOR SO2.

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 12.6900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 3.1000 T/YR Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIPControl Method: (N)

Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.4800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.3600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: LINE NO. 5 FORMING MACHINE

Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EPN F-541 A-C. ASSUMED TEXTILE-TYPE FIBER FOR THE PURPOSES OF ASSIGNING AN SCC CODE. EMISSIONS ARE LISTED

UNDER LINE NO. 5 FORMING MACHINE SCRUBBERS, BUT HAVE BEEN RENAMED FOR PURPOSES OF THIS DATABASE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 321.8900 LB/H SEE NOTE Emission Limit 2: 243.0700 T/YR SEE NOTE Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED EPNS ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS FOR THE FURNACES 1 THROUGH 5 MANUFACTURING LINES.

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY 6 MIN AV Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OAPCITY 6 MIN AV Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: N/A Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 5.5000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 24.1100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) SCRUBBERS Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSIONS ARE LISTED AS PM/PM10.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: MISCELLANEOUS FUGITIVES

Process Type: 49.005 (Fiberglass/Reinforced Polymer Products Manufacturing (except 49.004)) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: COMBINED ENTRY FOR THE FOLLOWING FUGITIVE EMISSIONS: MATERIAL SIZING AREA FUGITIVES (FUG-11), SIZE STAGING

AREA NOS 1 AND 2 FUGITIVES (FUG-12), SIZE STAGING AREA NOS. 3 AND 4 FUGITIVES (FUG-13), FURNACE NO. 5 FUGITIVES (FUG-5), AND WASTEWATER PRETREATMENT FUGITIVES (WWPTP). FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE ONLY.

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 321.8900 LB/H SEE NOTES Emission Limit 2: 243.0700 T/YR SEE NOTES Standard Emission:Standard Emission:

Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) NONE INDICATED Est. % Efficiency: Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Incremental Cost Effectiveness: 0 $/ton Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL NOTED EPNS ARE COMBINED AND INCLUDED AS TOTAL SIZE COMPOUND VOCS FOR THE FURNACES 1 THROUGH 5 MANUFACTURING LINES. FUGITIVE EMISSIONS FROM FURNACE NO. 5 ARE SUBJECT TO PSD.