alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 24 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 24

Providing for the broadcasting of press briefings on the floor prior to 
                     the Senate's daily convening.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 1995

    Mr. Dole (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
     resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the broadcasting of press briefings on the floor prior to 
                     the Senate's daily convening.

    Resolved, That notwithstanding the provisions of S. Res. 28 (99th 
Congress, 2nd Session), live television coverage of those periods 
before the Senate comes into session in which the press is allowed on 
the floor to ask questions of the majority and minority leaders be 
permitted.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

**Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

The undersigned executive officer of FirstFederal Bancshares of Arkansas, Inc. (the “Registrant”) hereby certifiesthat the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2005fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained thereinfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.

 

 
|                      | /s/Sherri R. Billings       |   |
|---------------------------|-----------------------------|--------|
|                      | Sherri R. Billings          |
|                      | EVP/Chief Financial Officer |
|                      |                        |
| Date: April 27, 2005 |                        |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

                    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act that the Veterans' Rural Health Advisory Committee will hold a teleconference meeting Tuesday, April 5, 2022, through Thursday April 7, 2022. The meeting will convene at 11:00 a.m. EST and adjourn at 2:30 p.m. EST each day. The meeting sessions are open to the public. The teleconference zoom link                     *https://zoom.us/​j/​93537309124*                     and phone number is 1-646-558-8656, Participant Code # 93537309124.                

The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of VA on rural health care issues affecting Veterans. The Committee examines programs and policies that impact the delivery of VA rural health care to Veterans and discusses ways to improve and enhance VA access to rural health care services for Veterans.

The agenda will include updates from Department leadership; the Executive Director, VA Office of Rural Health; and the Committee Chair; as well as presentations by subject matter experts on general rural health care access.

                    Public comments will be received at 3:00 p.m. on April 7, 2022. Interested parties should contact Ms. Judy Bowie, by email at                     *VRHAC@va.gov,*                     or by mail at 810 Vermont Avenue NW (10P1R), Washington, DC 20420. Individuals wishing to speak are invited to submit a 1-2-page summary of their comment for inclusion in the official meeting record. Any member of the public seeking additional information should contact Ms. Bowie at the phone number or email address noted above.                

Dated: March 17, 2022.

LaTonya L. Small,

Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2022-06124 Filed 3-22-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Matthew James DURY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-7225

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 18, 2018

Decided: January 30, 2018

Matthew James Dury, Appellant Pro Se. Donald David Gast, Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorneys, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Matthew James Dury appeals the district court’s order construing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4) motion as an unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and dismissing it for lack of jurisdiction. A certificate of appealability is not required to address the district court’s jurisdictional dismissal of Dury’s motion as a successive § 2255 motion. *See United States v. McRae,*793 F.3d 392, 400 (4th Cir. 2015). We conclude that the district court properly construed Dury’s request for Rule 60(b) relief as a successive § 2255 motion over which it lacked jurisdiction. *See Gonzalez v. Crosby,*545 U.S. 524, 531-32, 125 S.Ct. 2641, 162 L.Ed.2d 480 (2005). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.

Additionally, we construe Dury’s notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file a second or successive § 2255 motion. *United States v. Winestock,*340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on either:

> (1) newly discovered evidence that ... would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense; or

> (2) a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable.

28 U.S.C. § 2255(h). Dury’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria, Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion.

We deny Dury’s motion to void all proceedings in this case and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
#### IN RE: Garry David GALLARDO, Petitioner.

No. 17-2062

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 5, 2018

Decided: January 16, 2018

Garry David Gallardo, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before TRAXLER, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Garry David Gallardo petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED*
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Robert S. Herlin, Chief Executive Officer of Natural Gas Systems, Inc.,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Natural Gas Systems,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's Board of
Directors:

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

       Date: February 14, 2006               /s / ROBERT S. HERLIN
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Robert S. Herlin
                                             Chief Executive Officer
Order entered August 28, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01274-CV

THE SHOPS AT LEGACY (RPAI) L.P., AN ILLINOIS LIMITED 

PARTNERSHIP, Appellant

V.

DEL FRISCO'S GRILLE OF TEXAS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED 

LIABILITY COMPANY, AND DEL FRISCO'S RESTAURANT GROUP, 

INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, Appellees

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-03957-2018

ORDER

Appellant The Shops at Legacy (RPAI), L.P.’s motion for extension of time 

to file a motion for rehearing or en banc reconsideration is GRANTED. 

Appellant’s motion for rehearing or en banc reconsideration is now due to be filed 

on or before September 21, 2020. 

/s/ AMANDA L. REICHEK 

JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, Robert S.Herlin, President and Chief Executive Officer of Evolution PetroleumCorporation (the “Company”), certifies in connection with the filing with theSecurities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:

 

1. The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this certification as of the 15th day of November, 2010.

 
|   |   | /s/  ROBERT S. HERLIN                  |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   |   | Robert  S. Herlin                      |
|   |   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to EvolutionPetroleum Corporation and will be retained by Evolution Petroleum Corporationand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.  The foregoing certificate isbeing furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to thisForm 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.

 

----
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 10.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                         -------------------------------

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8) pertaining to the Employees' Stock Option Plan and forms F-3 (File
No. 333-8240, 333-12764 and 333-59548) of I.I.S. Intelligent Information Systems
Limited of our report dated March 21, 2002, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedules of I.I.S. Intelligent Information Systems
Limited included in the Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December
31, 2001, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


                                                /s/ Kost, Forer and Gabbay
                                                --------------------------------
Tel-Aviv, Israel                                KOST, FORER & GABBAY
June 26, 2002                                   A member of Ernst & Young Global
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of LoralSpace & Communications Ltd. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Bernard L. Schwartz,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Bernard L. Schwartz           Bernard L. Schwartz *Chief Executive Officer*November 9, 2005
Page 1 of 1

http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpegMod/PIA12097_modest.jpg 7/19/2010
#### IN RE: Minon MILLER, Debtor. Minon Miller, Appellant, v. Edward Gilliam, Appellee.

No. 16-60087

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed December 26, 2017

Minon Miller, Pro Se

Edward Gilliam, Pro Se

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes, this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*396MEMORANDUM **

Chapter 7 debtor Minon Miller appeals pro se from the judgment of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing Miller’s bankruptcy case, We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.'C. § 158(d). We review de novo BAP decisions, and apply the same standard of review that the BAP applied to the bankruptcy court’s ruling, *Boyajian v. New Falls Corp. (In re Boyajian),*564 F.3d 1088, 1090 (9th Cir. 2009), We affirm.

The bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Miller’s chapter 7 petition because the record supports the bankruptcy court’s extensive findings of abuse and bad faith. *See*11 U.S.C. §§ 707(b)(1), (b)(3)(A); *Price v. U.S. Trustee (In re Price),*353 F.3d 1135, 1138 (9th Cir. 2004) (reviewing for clear error a bankruptcy court’s factual findings and for an abuse of discretion its decision to dismiss a chapter 7 bankruptcy petition).

To the extent Miller argues that the bankruptcy court violated due process by considering any of Gilliam’s motions, we reject the contention because the record shows that the bankruptcy court provided Miller with adequate opportunity to respond and be heard.

We reject as without merit Miller’s contentions that the bankruptcy judge should have recused himself.

We do not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal or matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3,
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 207

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the International Monetary Fund

should raise funds in private financial markets, rather than from member

countries, in order to reduce the risk of loss to United States taxpayers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1998

Mr. SAXTON submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Banking and Financial Services

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the International

Monetary Fund should raise funds in private financial

markets, rather than from member countries, in order

to reduce the risk of loss to United States taxpayers.

Whereas the current methods of financing the International

Monetary Fund (IMF) are cumbersome and rely excessively on government contributions that put taxpayers’

money at risk;

Whereas the lending activities of the IMF can encourage unsound investment and associated moral hazard problems;

Whereas the United States Government has adopted a comprehensive emphasis on performance and results in evaluating government programs and policies;
2

•HCON 207 IH

Whereas the operation of the IMF is not consistent with

United States policy with regard to transparency of

financial transactions;

Whereas some of the conditions imposed by the IMF on borrowing countries can be counterproductive; and

Whereas the issuance of IMF bonds would work to reduce

moral hazard, limit taxpayer risk, promote transparency,

and make counterproductive conditions less likely: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 International Monetary Fund should raise funds in private

4 financial markets such as through the sale of bonds or

5 notes, rather than from member countries, in order to

6 reduce the risk of loss to United States taxpayers.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

The undersigned executive officer of First Federal Bancshares ofArkansas, Inc. (the “Registrant”) hereby certifies that the Registrant’s Form 10-Qfor the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrant.

 

 
|   |                | By:    |   /s/ Sherri R. Billings  |
|--------|---------------------|--------|--------------------------------|
|   |                |   |   Sherri R. Billings      |
|   |                |   |   Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                |   |                           |
| Date:  | July 24,  2008 |   |                           |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

Tuesday, March 22, 2022 at 10 a.m. and its continuation at the conclusion of the open meeting on March 24, 2022.

# PLACE:

1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC and virtual (this meeting will be a hybrid meeting).

# STATUS:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Compliance matters pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 30109. Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

* * * * *

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

*Authority:*                         Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Vicktoria J. Allen,

Acting Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2022-05789 Filed 3-15-22; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, Chief Judge, United States District Court

1

for the District of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-3181

___________

Kenneth S. Benigni, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

United States of America, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: April 7, 1998

 Filed: April 10, 1998 

___________

Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth S. Benigni brought a complaint under the Federal Tort Claims Act

(FTCA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-80. He alleged the United States Postal Service (USPS)

failed to investigate a death threat he received in the mail; intentionally withheld his

mail from home delivery on numerous occasions, requiring him to retrieve the mail

from the post office; and never delivered to him certain weekly newspapers. The

district court dismissed most of the complaint with prejudice, but dismissed the

1

intentional-withholding-of-mail claim without prejudice. Benigni appeals.
-2-

As the district court noted, Benigni&s failure-to-investigate claim was barred by

the “discretionary function” exception to the FTCA, see 28 U.S.C. § 2680(a), and his

loss-of-mail claim was barred by the postal exception to the FTCA, see 28 U.S.C.

§ 2680(b). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.