alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                  32
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        32
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       18332
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               411697
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             60037
<OTHER-SE>                                          453402
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         18332
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        75410
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     (5295)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (80705)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (80705)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (.010)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.010)



</TABLE>
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 68

Relating to impact on local governments.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 20 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 1995

Mr. PRESSLER (for Mr. BRADLEY) (for himself, Mr. CHAFEE, Mr. DORGAN,

Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. ROBB, Mr. DOLE, Mr. NICKLES, Mr. LAUTENBERG,

Mr. KEMPTHORNE, and Mr. WELLSTONE) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Relating to impact on local governments.

Whereas the Congress should be concerned about shifting

costs from Federal to State and local authorities and

should be equally concerned about the growing tendency

of States to shift costs to local governments;

Whereas the cost shifting from States to local governments

has, in many instances, forced local governments to raise

property taxes or curtail sometimes essential services;

and

Whereas the increases in local property taxes and cuts in essential services threaten the ability of many citizens to

attain and maintain the American dream of owning a

home in a safe, secure community: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that—
2

SRES 68 ATS

1 (1) The Federal Government should not shift

2 certain costs to the State, and States should end the

3 practice of shifting costs to local governments, which

4 forces many local governments to increase property

5 taxes;

6 (2) States should end the imposition, in the ab7 sence of full consideration by their legislatures, of

8 State issued mandates on local governments without

9 adequate State funding, in a manner that may dis10 place other essential government priorities; and

11 (3) one primary objective of this Act and other

12 efforts to change the relationship among Federal,

13 State, and local governments should be to reduce

14 taxes and spending at all levels and to end the prac15 tice of shifting costs from one level of government to

16 another with little or no benefit to taxpayers.

Æ
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

ERIC HOLLIS, Appellant,
v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION

and JAMES IVAN STATEN, JR.,

Appellees. No. 2D23-1489
March 15, 2024 Appeal from the Department of Business and Professional Regulation. Eric Hollis, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Marlene K. Stern, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and Ronald Jones, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee Department of Business and Professional Regulation. No appearance for Appellee James Ivan Staten, Jr.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See

Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a). MORRIS, BLACK, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.2

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 48 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 48

  Authorizing the rotunda of the United States Capitol to be used on 
January 20, 1997, in connection with the proceedings and ceremonies for 
the inauguration of the President-elect and the Vice President-elect of 
                           the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 20, 1996

     Mr. Warner (for himself and Mr. Ford) submitted the following 
       concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Authorizing the rotunda of the United States Capitol to be used on 
January 20, 1997, in connection with the proceedings and ceremonies for 
the inauguration of the President-elect and the Vice President-elect of 
                           the United States.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That (a) the rotunda of the United States Capitol is hereby authorized 
to be used on January 20, 1997, by the Joint Congressional Committee on 
Inaugural Ceremonies (the ``Joint Committee'') in connection with the 
proceedings and ceremonies conducted for the inauguration of the 
President-elect and the Vice President-elect of the United States.
    (b) The Joint Committee is authorized to utilize appropriate 
equipment and the services of appropriate personnel of departments and 
agencies of the Federal Government, under arrangements between such 
Committee and the heads of such departments and agencies, in connection 
with such proceedings and ceremonies. The Joint Committee may accept 
gifts and donations of goods and services to carry out its 
responsibilities.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Tensleep
Technologies, Inc., unaudited Interim Financial Statements dated
December 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001006024
<NAME> TENSLEEP.COM, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          72,024
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               753,791
<PP&E>                                         274,385
<DEPRECIATION>                                 160,060
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,769,916
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,361
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        70,040
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,769,916
<SALES>                                        750,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               750,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               277,148
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   472,852
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.066
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.062







</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,290
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  162,660
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 316,679
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            52
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   316,679
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,203
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,879
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (73)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,814
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,924
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,213
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,711
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,711
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

Certification of Principle Executive Officer and Principle Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Gary S. Olson, Chief Executive Officer and President of ESSA Bancorp, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (the Company) and Allan A.
Muto, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009 (the
Report) and that to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                                     
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: December 11, 2009 |  | /s/ Gary S. Olson                                   
|                        |  | Gary S. Olson                                       
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer and President               
|                        | 
|Date: December 11, 2009 |  | /s/ Allan A. Muto                                   
|                        |  | Allan A. Muto                                       
|                        |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Clarence L. SCOTT Plaintiff-Appellee v. Justin DELEON, Individually and in his Official Capacity Defendant-Appellant *764Dewey Young, Individually and in his Official Capacity; Steven Creek, Individually and in his Official Capacity; Chief of Police Kevin D. Lindsey, Individually and in his Official Capacity; Sebastian Co Sheriff Bill Hollenbeck, Individually and in his Official Capacity Defendants Fort Smith, Arkansas, City of Defendant-Appellant Fort Smith Police Department; Sebastian County, Arkansas; Sebastian County Sheriff's Department; Arkansas Municipal League Defendants

No. 16-4167

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: August 3, 2017

Filed: August 29, 2017

Kathryn L. Hudson, Justin Scott Huett, Hudson Law Office, Little Rock, AR, for Plaintiff-Appellee

James Troy Gaston, Walters & Gasón, Greenwood, AR, Michael A. LaFreniere, Colby T. Roe, Wyman Rice Wade, Jr., Daily *&*Woods, Fort Smith, AR, for Defendant-Appellant Justin Deleon

Michael A. LaFreniere, Colby T. Roe, Wyman Rice Wade, Jr., Daily & Woods, Fort Smith, AR, for Defendant-Appellant Fort Smith, Arkansas, City of

Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Fort Smith Police Department Officer Justin Deleon and the City of Fort Smith, Arkansas, appeal the district court’s1 interlocutory order denying Deleon qualified immunity on one of the excessive-force claims asserted by Clarence Scott in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action.

In this interlocutory appeal, our review is limited to determining whether the conduct that the district court found sufficiently supported for summary judgment purposes violated Scott’s clearly established rights. See Shannon v. Koehler, 616 F.3d 855, 861 (8th Cir. 2010). We review de novo the determination that Scott is not entitled to qualified immunity. We must decide whether the facts, construed in the light most favorable to Scott, established a constitutional violation, and whether the right was clearly established such that a reasonable person in Deleon’s position would have known that his actions were unlawful. See Krout v. Goemmer, 583 F.3d 557, 564 (8th Cir. 2009). We are not bound to accept a version of events if it is blatantly contradicted by the record such that no reasonable jury could believe it. See Ehlers v. City of Rapid City, 846 F.3d 1002, 1010 (8th Cir. 2017). Having reviewed the record in light of this standard, we conclude that the district court appropriately denied Deleon qualified immunity.

Further, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction over Fort Smith’s arguments as to Scott’s municipal-liability claim. See Shannon, 616 F.3d at 865-66 (dismissing for lack of jurisdiction city’s appeal of denial of summary judgment on municipal-liability claim where this court affirmed denial of qualified immunity as to city police officer).

*765The judgment denying qualified immunity to Deleon is affirmed, and Port Smith’s appeal is dismissed.

1

. The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 162 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 162

 Relating to the recent developments toward normalization of relations 
                      between India and Pakistan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 30, 1997

 Mr. Rohrabacher submitted the following concurrent resolution; which 
        was referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Relating to the recent developments toward normalization of relations 
                      between India and Pakistan.

Whereas the nations of India and Pakistan, who are both allies of the United 
        States, have initiated talks over a wide range of issues;
Whereas the disputed areas of Jammu and Kashmir have caused India and Pakistan 
        to go to war against each other on two separate occasions and these 
        areas--a point of potential nuclear confrontation--remain the primary 
        source of tension between the two countries;
Whereas the All Parties Hurriyet Conference, an umbrella of moderate political 
        parties dedicated to peacefully resolving this dispute, has expanded its 
        political organizational efforts to engage the people of Jammu;
Whereas the people of Jammu and Kashmir seek to express their rights in United 
        Nations resolutions for a national plebiscite to provide for their 
        future;
Whereas past United Nations resolutions have called for a referendum on the 
        issue of Jammu and Kashmir; and
Whereas Secretary of State Madeleine K. Albright has stated that the United 
        States will seek to reevaluate the position of the United States toward 
        South Asia in order to promote peace and long-term stability: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That--
            (1) the Congress supports and applauds the efforts 
        undertaken by Prime Minister I. K. Gujral of India and Prime 
        Minister Nawaz Sharif of Pakistan to normalize relations 
        between the two countries; and
            (2) it is the sense of the Congress that--
                    (A) the issue of the status of Jammu and Kashmir 
                should be resolved in conjunction with India and 
                Pakistan and representatives of the people of Jammu and 
                Kashmir;
                    (B) the wishes of the people of Jammu and Kashmir 
                should be impartially ascertained as regards the future 
                status of their state; and
                    (C) the United States should continue to use its 
                best efforts to promote peace and stability in South 
                Asia as well as to the normalization of relations 
                between India and Pakistan.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-01-1999
<CASH>                                       3,513,011
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,744,446
<ALLOWANCES>                                   128,195
<INVENTORY>                                     84,541
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               336,741
<PP&E>                                       2,516,512
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,285,173)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,402,426
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,848,134
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       106,677
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,402,426
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,989,026
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,688,639
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,144,899
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (15,721)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,405
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,776,212)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,776,212)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,776,212)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.36)


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Victor HUIJON-LEON, also known as Victor Leon, also known as Rudolfo Ruiz, also known as Victor Huijon Leon, also known as Victor R. Samora, also known as Jose L. Huerta, also known as Victor Manuel Samora, also known as Miguel Garcia, also known as Jose Leon, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-20186 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 7, 2017

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Victor Huijon-Leon, Pro Se

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Victor Huijon-Leon has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hui-jon-Leon has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further re*327sponsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cíe. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.