alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
JACK CARSWELL, MINOR 

CHILD, AND JULIE 

CARSWELL AND JACK 

CARSWELL, PARENTS,

Appellants,

v.

FLORIDA STATE 

UNIVERSITY SCHOOLS, INC.; 

FLORIDA STATE 

UNIVERSITY SCHOOLS, INC., 

BOARD OF DIRECTORS; AND 

FLORIDA STATE 

UNIVERSITY BOARD OF 

TRUSTEES,

Appellees.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-6157

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 19, 2014.

An appeal from an order of the Division of Administrative Hearings.

E. Gary Early, Administrative Law Judge.

M. Linville Atkins, Tallahassee, for Appellants.

Robyn Blank Jackson and Lisa Scoles, Associate General Counsels, Tallahassee, 

for Appellee Florida State University Board of Trustees.

Jon C. Moyle, Jr., of Moyle Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellee Florida 

State University Schools, Inc., and Florida State University Schools Inc., Board of 

Directors.
PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, MARSTILLER, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.

2
# Official Journal L 66/2008

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 66 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5110 March 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 66

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5110 March 2008

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EC) No 194/2008 of 25 February 2008 renewing and strengthening the restrictive measures in respect of Burma/Myanmar and repealing Regulation (EC) No 817/2006 | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EC) No 194/2008 of 25 February 2008 renewing and strengthening the restrictive measures in respect of Burma/Myanmar and repealing Regulation (EC) No 817/2006

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 35.4

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

CGCMT 2014-GC25

The undersigned, David Co, a
Director of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as the Custodian (a Certifying Servicer) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2014 (the Agreement), by and among, Citigroup Commercial
Mortgage Securities Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, A Division of PNC Bank National Association, as Special Servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor,
Citibank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, here by certifies in accordance with Section 10.08 of the Agreement:



| | A) | A review of such Certifying Servicers activities from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the reporting period) and of such Certifying Servicers performance under the Agreement has
been made under such officers supervision and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B) | That, as to the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement, in all material respects throughout the reporting period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS as Custodian/s/ David CoBY:

David CoTitle:

DirectorDate:

March 1, 2016
#### Zerik A. SCOTT, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Respondent

2017-1203

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

November 13, 2017

Anthony Waeren Walluk, San Antonio, TX, argued for petitioner.

David Michael Kerr, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by Chad A. Readler, Robert E. Kirschman, Jh„ L. Misha Preheim.

(Prost, Chief Judge, Lourie and Chen, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
# EUR-Lex - 32002R1078 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32002R1078

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1078/2002 of 21 June 2002 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables **

*
Official Journal L 164 , 22/06/2002 P. 0008 - 0009 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1078/2002

of 21 June 2002

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1498/98(2), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in the Annex thereto.

(2) In compliance with the above criteria, the standard import values must be fixed at the levels set out in the Annex to this Regulation,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 22 June 2002.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 June 2002.

For the Commission

J. M. Silva Rodríguez

Agriculture Director-General

(1) OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66.

(2) OJ L 198, 15.7.1998, p. 4.

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 21 June 2002 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

>TABLE>
SERVED FEBRUARY 7, 2012 

.'•'APARTMENT OF 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION .:n;ANSPORTATIOM 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS .•iCKFJ OPERATiONS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

In The Matter Of: 

TIFFIN AIRE, INC. 

Respondent 

DOCKET NO. FAA-20n-l007 

(CaseNo. 20I0-GL-70-0256) 

ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

On February 6, 2012, the Complainant, the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) filed a "Withdrawal of Tiffin Aire, Inc.," with the Office of Hearings. This 

Withdrawal of Complaint stated that the parties had reached a settlement and that by joint 

agreement, they wished to remove the case from the Office of Hearings' litigation docket. 

There is no hearing currently set in this matter. 

It Is Hereby Ordered: 

1) The Notice of Complaint filed by the FAA on September 16,2011 with the 

Office of Hearings is hereby withdrawn. 

2) Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §13.215, this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. 

Iliivan 

ftstrative Law Judge 

Attachment: Service List 
FDMSNo. FAA-2011-1007 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC^3 0 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Bradley W. Newman, President 

Tiffin Aire Inc.. Respondent 

Seneca County Aiiport 

1778 West State Route 224 

Tiffin, OH 44883 

TEL: 419-447-4263 

FAX: 419-447-4042 

Kate Barber, Complainant ^a Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, AGL-7 

Great Lakes Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

DesPlaines,lL 60018 

TEL; 847-294-7862 

FAX: 847-294-7498 

The Honorable .I.E. ^wW'wd^n, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address; Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC^30. 

-2- .
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 21 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 21

To amend Senate Resolution 338 (which establishes the Select Committee 
   on Ethics) to change the membership of the select committee from 
               members of the Senate to private citizens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 1995

Mr. Helms submitted the following resolution; which was ordered to lie 
                          over, under the rule

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To amend Senate Resolution 338 (which establishes the Select Committee 
   on Ethics) to change the membership of the select committee from 
               members of the Senate to private citizens.

    Resolved, That (a) subsection (a) of the first section of Senate 
Resolution 338, agreed to July 23, 1964 (88th Congress, 2d session), is 
amended to read as follows: ``(a)(1) there is hereby established a 
permanent select committee of the Senate to be known as the Select 
Committee on Ethics (referred to in this resolution as the `Select 
Committee') consisting of 6 members all of whom shall be private 
citizens. Three members of the Select Committee shall be selected by 
the Majority Leader and 3 shall be selected by the Minority Leader. 
Each member of the Select Committee shall serve 6 years except that the 
Majority Leader and the Minority Leader when making their initial 
appointments shall each designate 1 member to serve only 2 years and 1 
member to serve only 4 years. At least 2 members of the Select 
Committee shall be retired Federal judges, and at least 2 members of 
the Select Committee shall be former members of the Senate. Members of 
the Select Committee may be reappointed.
    ``(2) The Select Committee shall select a chairman and a vice 
chairman from among its members.
    ``(3) Members of the Select Committee shall serve without 
compensation but shall be entitled to travel and per diem expenses in 
accordance with the rules and regulations of the Senate.''.
    (b) Subsection (e) of the first section of Senate Resolution 338 
(as referred to in subsection (a)) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
#### Christopher Ilanders STREET, Petitioner-Appellant, v. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Attorney General for the State of Nevada, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 16-15554

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 4, 2017 * San Francisco, California

Filed December 06, 2017

Megan Hoffman, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, for Petitioner-Appellant

Victor-Hugo Schulze, II, Esquire, Senior Deputy Attorney General, AGNV—Office of the Nevada Attorney General (Las Vegas), Las Vegas, NV, Joseph Friedman Tartakovsky, Esquire, Deputy Solicitor General, AGNV—Nevada Office of the Attorney General, Carson City, NV, for Respondent-Appellee Nevada Department of Corrections

Victor-Hugo Schulze, II, .Esquire, Senior Deputy Attorney General, AGNV—Office of the Nevada Attorney General (Las Vegas), Las Vegas, NV, for Respondent-Ap-pellee Attorney General for the State of Nevada

Before: KOZINSKI and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and KEELEY,** District Judge.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Irene M, Keeley, United States District Judge for the Northern District of West Virginia, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

1. Under AEDPA, to establish an entitlement to equitable tolling of the deadline for filing a federal habeas petition, a petitioner must show that he has been pursuing his rights diligently and that some extraordinary circumstance stood in his way that prevented timely filing. Holland v. Florida, 560 U.S. 631, 649, 130 S.Ct. 2549, 177 L.Ed.2d 130 (2010). A mental impairment only constitutes an extraordinary circumstance if it was so severe that the “petitioner was unable rationally or factually to personally understand the need to timely file, or ... petitioner’s mental state rendered him unable personally to prepare a habeas petition and effectuate its filing.” Bills v. Clark, 628 F.3d 1092, 1100 (9th Cir. 2010). While incarcerated, Street repeatedly made statements to pris*626on doctors denying that he was experiencing psychological symptoms. The district court correctly found that Street failed to demonstrate the type of severe mental impairment that would justify equitable tolling.

2. Street has presented no evidence of abandonment by counsel within the window of time for which he seeks equitable tolling. The district court correctly denied tolling for this period.

3. Because Street’s two prior claims to equitable tolling fail, we need not decide whether Street was entitled to tolling between May 14, 2013 and July 22, 2013. The one-year filing window had already closed by that point.

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       5,745,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,955,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (218,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,754,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,853,000
<PP&E>                                     127,436,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (41,257,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             117,422,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,150,000
<BONDS>                                     43,500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (11,798,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               117,422,000
<SALES>                                     39,715,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            39,715,000
<CGS>                                       12,754,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               32,633,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,625,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,060,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,060,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,060,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .95
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF PATINA OIL & GAS CORPORATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.ss.1350



1. I, Thomas J. Edelman, Chief Executive Officer of Patina Oil & Gas Corporation (the Company), hereby certify to the best of my knowledge that the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ending September 30, 2003 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Report) by the Company fully complies with the requirements
of that section.



2. I further certify to the best of my knowledge that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/    Thomas J.
EdelmanName:Thomas J. EdelmanDate:   October 30, 2003




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
document.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Patina Oil & Gas Corporation and will be retained by Patina Oil & Gas Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 30, 2013 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-13-01132-CV MILDRED SLOAN, Appellant V. DEBORAH PANKEY, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES W. COLLINS, DECEASED, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011-2-174CV 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Lang-Miers, and Lewis Opinion by Justice Francis In a letter dated November 25, 2013, the Court questioned its ju risdiction over this appeal because it appeared the judgment wa s not final. We requested that appellant file a letter brief addressing our jurisdictional concern by December 9, 2013. We cautioned a ppellant that failure to file a letter brief within th e time requested would re sult in dismissal of her appeal without further notice. As of today’s date, appe llant has not filed a jurisdictional brief. Generally, this Court has jurisdic tion only over final judgments. See Lehmann v. HarCon Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). A final judg ment is one that disposes of all pending parties and claims. Id

. In her notice of appeal, appellant stated that she is appealing the order signed by the trial court on July 19, 2013. In this order, the trial court grante d appellee’s motion for partial–2– summary judgment with regard to appellant’s claims. The trial court’s order did not dispose of appellee’s counterclaim for attorney’s fees. Because the counterclaim remains pending, the judgment is not final and appealable. See Lehmann , 39 S.W.3d at 195. Acco rdingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(a).

131132F.P05 /Molly Francis/ MOLLY FRANCIS JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
MILDRED SLOAN, Appellant
No. 05-13-01132-CV V. DEBORAH PANKEY, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES W. COLLINS, DECEASED, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1, Grayson County, Texas. Trial Court Cause No. 2011-2-174CV. Opinion delivered by Justice Francis. Justices Lang-Miers and Lewis, participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opi nion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee, DEBORAH PANKEY, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES W. COLLINS, DECEASED, r ecover her costs of this appeal from appellant, MILDRED SLOAN.
Judgment entered December 30, 2013

/Molly Francis/ MOLLY FRANCIS JUSTICE
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                     STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF PRO FORMA
                       NET INCOME PER COMMON AND COMMON
                               EQUIVALENT SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                   AVERAGE SHARES
                                                                     OUTSTANDING
                                                                 FOR THE NINE MONTHS
                        SHARES                                   ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
                        ISSUED               ISSUE DATE                 1997
                        ------               ----------                 ----
<S>                   <C>                       <C>                  <C>       
Common Stock          13,356,990                 (a)                 13,356,990
Common Stock             232,603                 (b)                    134,211
Common Stock              33,178                 (c)                     23,528
Options                      N/A                 (d)                    947,074
                                                                     ----------
                                                                     14,461,803
                                                                     ----------
</TABLE>

METHOD USED FOR CALCULATION

(a)  Represents Common Stock issued and outstanding as of December 31, 1996.

(b)  Shares issued upon exercise of stock options at various dates
     throughout 1997.

(c)  Shares issued pursuant to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan at various
     dates throughout 1997.

(d)  Common stock equivalent shares calculated using the treasury method.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 22, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 16218]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05969]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Sleep 
Disorders Research Advisory Board, April 7, 2022, 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 
p.m., Virtual Meeting, which was published in the Federal Register on 
March 09, 2022, V 87 Vol. 46, Page 13302, FR Doc No. 2022-04982.
    Meeting is being amended to change the telephone call in number to 
1-669-254-5252 (Meeting ID: 161 532 8417 Passcode: 330488). The meeting 
is open to the public.

    Dated: March 16, 2022.
David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-05969 Filed 3-21-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
WILLIE A. BRIGHT, ET AL.,

Petitioner,

v.

HANCOCK BANK, AS 

ASSIGNEE OF THE FEDERAL 

DEPOSIT INSURANCE 

CORPORATION AS RECEIVER 

OF PEOPLES FIRST 

COMMUNITY BANK,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-3601

Opinion filed November 12, 2014.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari -- Original Jurisdiction.

Rev. James T. Golden, Bradenton, for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

BENTON, ROBERTS, and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.