alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## NUMBER 13

- 2 3

- 00 295

- CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

CAROLINA SANCHEZ AND
ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS

, Appellant s ,

v.

A. JIMENEZ D/B/A LULAC VILLAGE APT.

, Appellee.

ON APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 5
OF NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Peña Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria

On January 18, 2024 , a ppellant Carolina Sanchez “and all other occupants” filed

a pro se notice of appeal from a judgment of eviction. On January 9 , 2024, the Clerk of

th is Court advised appellant s by certified letter that the appellants ’ brief was due on

December 15, 2023, that the brief had not been timely file d

, and that the appeal would be2 dismissed unless, within ten days, appellant s explained the failure to file the brief and the

appellee would not be significantly injured by a late filing

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 38.8(a)(1)

,

42.3(b), (c)

. Because it appeared that appellant s failed to receive this certified letter, on

February 16, 2024, the Clerk advised appellant s by email and regular mail that the brief

h ad not been filed and that the appeal would be dismissed unless, within ten days,

appellant s explained the failure and the appellee would not be significantly injured by the ir

failure to timely file a brief. See id. Appellant s neither responded to the Clerk’s directives

nor filed the brief.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the foregoing sequence of

events, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. See

id. R. 38.8(a); Nevarez v . Elguea , 181 S.W.3d 540, 541 (Tex. App.

— El Paso 2005, no

pet.). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c).

NORA L. LONGORIA
Justice

Delivered and filed on the
21 st day of March

, 202 4

.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 237 Referral Instructions Senate (RIS)]

  2d Session
S. RES. 237

To express the sense of the Senate regarding reduction of the national 
                                 debt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 29, 1996

 Mr. Faircloth submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
 jointly pursuant to the order of August 4, 1977, to the Committees on 
  the Budget and Governmental Affairs, with instructions that if one 
Committee reports, the other Committee have thirty days to report or be 
                               discharged

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To express the sense of the Senate regarding reduction of the national 
                                 debt.

Whereas the United States national debt is approximately $4.9 trillion;
Whereas the Congress has authorized the national debt by law to reach $5.5 
        trillion;
Whereas the 104th Congress and the President have both presented plans to 
        balance the budget by the year 2002, by which time our national debt 
        will be approximately $6.5 trillion;
Whereas this accumulated debt represents a significant financial burden that 
        will require excessive taxation and lost economic opportunity for future 
        generations of the United States;
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that any comprehensive 
legislation that balances the budget by a certain date and that is 
agreed to by the Congress and the President shall also contain a 
strategy for reducing the national debt of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 111 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 111

Relative to the death of the Honorable John C. Stennis, late a Senator 
                     from the State of Mississippi.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               April 26 (legislative day, April 24), 1995

    Mr. Dole (for himself, Mr. Daschle, Mr. Cochran, and Mr. Lott) 
 submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Relative to the death of the Honorable John C. Stennis, late a Senator 
                     from the State of Mississippi.

    Resolved, That the Senate has heard with profound sorrow and deep 
regret the announcement of the death of the Honorable John C. Stennis, 
late a Senator from the State of Mississippi.
    Resolved, That the Secretary communicate these resolutions to the 
House of Representatives and transmit an enrolled copy thereof to the 
family of the deceased.
    Resolved, That when the Senate recesses today, it recess as a 
further mark of respect to the memory of the deceased Senator.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,026,303
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  463,328
<ALLOWANCES>                                    33,506
<INVENTORY>                                    921,779
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,680,674
<PP&E>                                       3,745,470
<DEPRECIATION>                                 745,387
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,370,913
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          736,430
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,965,060
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,370,913
<SALES>                                      4,411,355
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,411,355
<CGS>                                        2,128,349
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,128,349
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                71,217
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             194,160
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                692,125
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   692,125
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Zhang Hui, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form
10-K of Tsingda eEdu Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Tsingda eEdu Corporation.

|                      |        |                              
|--------------------- | ------ | -----------------------------
|                      | By:    | /s/
 Zhang Hui               
|                      |        |                              
|Date: March
 11, 2011 | Name:  | Zhang Hui                    
|                      | Title: | Chief Executive Officer      
|                      |        | (Principal Executive Officer)
|                      |        |                              

---
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 44 / Monday, March 7, 2022 / Presidential Documents 12557 

Notice of March 3, 2022 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to 

Venezuela 

On March 8, 2015, the President issued Executive Order 13692, declaring 

a national emergency with respect to the situation in Venezuela, including 

the Government of Venezuela’s erosion of human rights guarantees, persecution of political opponents, curtailment of press freedoms, use of violence 

and human rights violations and abuses in response to antigovernment protests, and arbitrary arrest and detention of antigovernment protesters, as 

well as the exacerbating presence of significant government corruption. 

The President took additional steps pursuant to this national emergency 

in Executive Order 13808 of August 24, 2017; Executive Order 13827 of 

March 19, 2018; Executive Order 13835 of May 21, 2018; Executive Order 

13850 of November 1, 2018; Executive Order 13857 of January 25, 2019; 

and Executive Order 13884 of August 5, 2019. 

The circumstances, as described in Executive Order 13692 and in subsequent 

Executive Orders issued with respect to Venezuela, have not improved, 

and they continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national 

security and foreign policy of the United States. Therefore, in accordance 

with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), 

I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive 

Order 13692. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

March 3, 2022. 

[FR Doc. 2022–04908 

Filed 3–4–22; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3395–F2–P 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PRESDOC2BIDEN.EPS</GPH>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF PATINA OIL & GAS CORPORATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.ss.1350



1. I, David J. Kornder, Chief Financial Officer of Patina Oil & Gas Corporation (the Company), hereby certify to the best of my knowledge that the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ending March 31, 2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Report) by the Company fully complies with the requirements of
that section.



2. I further certify to the best of my knowledge that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ David J. KornderName: Date:

David J. Kornder April 29, 2004




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
document.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Patina Oil & Gas Corporation and will be retained by Patina Oil & Gas Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions

NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(released the week prior to September 27, 2022)

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of 

Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES:

A-22-188 In re Interest of Alexis G. & Bella B.

The above-listed memorandum opinions can be viewed online through the 

appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebraska.gov:

http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here:

https://www.nebraska.gov/courts/sccales/.
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 250

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding tactile currency for the blind

and visually impaired.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 24, 1996

Mr. BROWN (for himself, Mr. FAIRCLOTH, Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN, and Mr.

SHELBY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding tactile currency

for the blind and visually impaired.

Whereas currency is used by virtually everyone in everyday

life, including blind and visually impaired persons;

Whereas the Federal reserve notes of the United States are

inaccessible to individuals with visual disabilities;

Whereas the Americans with Disabilities Act enhances the

economic independence and equal opportunity for full

participation in society for individuals with disabilities;

Whereas most blind and visually impaired persons are therefore required to rely upon others to determine denominations of such currency;
2

SRES 250 IS

Whereas this constitutes a serious impediment to independence in everyday living;

Whereas electronic means of bill identification will always be

more fallible than purely tactile means;

Whereas tactile currency already exists in 23 countries worldwide; and

Whereas the currency of the United States is presently undergoing significant changes for security purposes: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) endorses the efforts recently begun by the

3 Bureau of Engraving and Printing to upgrade the

4 currency for security reasons; and

5 (2) strongly encourages the Secretary of the

6 Treasury and the Bureau of Engraving and Printing

7 to incorporate cost-effective, tactile features into the

8 design changes, thereby including the blind and vis9 ually impaired community in independent currency

10 usage.

Æ
**Exhibit 99.1**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**
     In connection with the Quarterly Report of LoralSpace & Communications Ltd. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Bernard L. Schwartz,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
     (1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and
     (2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ BERNARD L. SCHWARTZ      Bernard L. Schwartz     *Chief Executive Officer*
May 15, 2003
#### Rapheal G. RUSSELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Myong Suk MUELLER; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-35697

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed December 26, 2017

Rapheal G. Russell, Pro Se

Kimberlee Walker Olsen, Attorney, Luke Casteel *&*Olsen, Lynnwood, WA, for Defendants-Appellees

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Rapheal G. Russell appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his action arising from a property dispute. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Rundgren v. Wash. Mut. Bank, FA,*760 F.3d 1056, 1060 (9th Cir. 2014). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Russell’s action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because Russell failed to allege a federal question or jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1331 (conferring jurisdiction on district courts in “civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States”); *Caterpillar, Inc. v. Lewis,*519 U.S. 61, 68, 117 S.Ct. 467, 136 L.Ed.2d 437 (1996) (28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) applies only when the state citizenship of each plaintiff is diverse from each defendant).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009),

We do not consider documents not presented to the district court because they are not part of the record on appeal. *See United States v. Elias,*921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3,
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Alejandro ARENAS-CEPEDA, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40282 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 20, 2017

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Alejandro Arenas-Cepeda, Pro Se

Before JONES, DENNIS, and ' GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alejandro Arenas-Cepeda has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Arenas-Cepeda has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s rqotion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
FILED

October 31, 1997

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

EASTERN SECTION

WILLIAM L. COOK, ) C/A NO. 03A01-9706-CV-00212

)

Plaintiff-Appellant, ) SULLIVAN LAW

)

v. ) 

) 

BROOKSIDE USED AUTO PARTS, )

INC., ) 

) 

Defendant-Appellee. ) 

O R D E R

This cause was regularly heard and considered by the court. IT IS NOW

ORDERED that the judgment of the Trial Court is vacated, and the cause remanded. 

The costs of appeal are adjudged to defendant, for which execution may issue if

necessary.

PER CURIUM
Page 1 of 1 Meeting Summary September 20, 2011, 1:00 PM to 2:00 PM Room S-12100, 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA 22202

Participants

Non-EPA American Cleaning Institute: Richard Se dlak, Paul DeLeo, Francis Kruszewski Canadian Consumer Specialty Products Association: Yamile Wasslen (by phone)

Consumer Health Products Associati on: Barbara Kochanowski (by phone)

Personal Care Products Council: Farah Ahmed, John Krowka BASF: Samantha Champ, Robert Finking, Sascha Pawlowski Ecolab: Peter Carlson (by phone) Henkel Consumer Goods, Inc.: Carl D’Ruiz, Mary Vihstadt The Procter & Gamble Company: Chuck O’Hara TOXRAC, LLC (Representing Vi vamed): Martin Bernstein The Accord Group (Represent ing Microban): Pat Quinn

EPA Office of Pesticide Programs: Steven Bradbur y, Jennifer Mclain, Joan Harrigan-Farrelly, Tim McMahon, Zoe Layton, Karen Hill, Rebecca von dem Hagen

Office of Water: Di ana Eignor (by phone)

Office of General Council: Andrea Medici, Chris E. Kaczmarek

Summary On Tuesday, September 20, 2011, the Director of the Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) and the Antimicrobials Division (AD) hosted a meeting with the American Cleaning Institute (ACI) and other groups listed above to discuss the petition to ban triclosan that was submitted to EPA by Beyond Pesticides and Food & Water Watch in January 2010. EPA posted the petition for a 120-day public comment period beginning in December 2010. The petition and comments submitted during the public comment period can be viewed at regulations.gov in docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0548.

At the meeting, ACI inquired about the Agency ’s decision to post the petition for public comment, what the Agency’s next steps are in addressing the petiti on and the status of

OPP’s reevaluation of triclosan. At the re quest of ACI, the Agency also discussed collaboration efforts on triclosan internally with the Office of Water and the Office of Research and Development and externally with FDA, Canada and others.
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 206

Making minority party appointments for the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 29, 1995

Mr. LEAHY (for Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Making minority party appointments for the Committee on

Veterans’ Affairs.

1 Resolved, That the following shall constitute the mi2 nority party’s membership on the Committee on Veterans’

3 Affairs for the second session of the 104th Congress, or

4 until their successors are appointed: Mr. Rockefeller, Mr.

5 Graham, Mr. Akaka, Mr. Wellstone, and Mrs. Murray.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 186 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 186

To authorize testimony by Senate employees and representation by Senate 
                             Legal Counsel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             October 19 (legislative day, October 18), 1995

    Mr. Dole (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To authorize testimony by Senate employees and representation by Senate 
                             Legal Counsel.

    Whereas the defendant in Triangle MLP United Partnership v. United 
            States, No. 95-430C, a civil action pending in the United 
            States Court of Federal Claims, is seeking testimony at a 
            deposition from Charles Stek and Rebecca Wagner, employees 
            of the Senate who are on the staff of Senator Paul S. 
            Sarbanes;
    Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and 
            rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence 
            under the control or in the possession of the Senate can, 
            by administrative or judicial process, be taken from such 
            control or possession but by permission of the Senate;
    Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the 
            possession of the Senate is needed for the promotion of 
            justice, the Senate will take such action as will promote 
            the ends of justice consistent with the privileges of the 
            Senate;
    Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in 
            Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 
            288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent 
            employees of the Senate with respect to subpoenas or 
            requests for testimony issued or made to them in their 
            official capacities: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Charles Stek, Rebecca Wagner, and any other employee 
of the Senate from whom testimony may be required are authorized to 
testify and to produce documents in the case of Triangle MLP United 
Partnership v. United States, except concerning matters for which a 
privilege should be asserted.
    Sec. 2. That the Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent 
Charles Stek, Rebecca Wagner, and any other employee of the Senate in 
connection with the testimony authorized by this resolution.
                                 <all>
```