alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONI, Kokmeng Koh, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-Drequired to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K ofPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2006-91 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and otherinformation required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by thisreport is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required inthis report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct period reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 28, 2007   /s/ Kokmeng Koh     Kokmeng Koh  Second Vice President
**CERTIFICATION      OF LARRY POWALISZ**

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                                                                                                                                                                                                                          | March                27, 2008 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |                          |
| /s/                Larry                Powalisz                              |
| Larry                Powalisz                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
| Chief                Executive Officer and                                                                                                                                                                                     |
| Principal                Accounting Officer                                                                                                                                                                                    |

----
SpectraFlyingWingandVariantsOptimum Configuration-48"WingspanPayloadoptionalbaseduponmissioncriterionCopyrightRPFiightSystems,Inc.©2008Dimensions--ScalabilityA-Depth:16"to32"C-Height:7"to10"B-Wingspan:24"to80"ABII1cvCategoryHandLaunchTierIModelSpecifications48"TypicalWingspan•Construction:CompositeASS.CarbonFiber,Fiberglass•Propulsion:Electric,threephaseA/C.90%efficiency,lithiumpolymerhighdensitybatteries·EmptyWeight:1.97lbs•Payload:2-4lbs·AllUpWeight:4lbsoptimumupto 6lbsmax•LaunchType:HandLaunch•Retrieval/Landing:Nospecialrequirements•ClimbRate:740fpm•Cruise:34mph·Max:55mph•Stall:14mph(4lbAUW)·DwellTime:45minutes@50%cruise·Turnaroundtime:3min(alldown/onstation)·TypicalPayload:StreamingEO/IRopticalandhighresolutiondigitalimageryupto10megapixel
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6315 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6315

To authorize the award of the Medal of Honor to James C. McCloughan for 
                 acts of valor during the Vietnam War.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 14, 2016

  Mr. Upton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the award of the Medal of Honor to James C. McCloughan for 
                 acts of valor during the Vietnam War.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF THE MEDAL OF HONOR TO JAMES C. 
              MCCLOUGHAN FOR ACTS OF VALOR DURING THE VIETNAM WAR.

    (a) Authorization.--Notwithstanding the time limitations specified 
in section 3744 of title 10, United States Code, or any other time 
limitation with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons 
who served in the Armed Forces, the President may award the Medal of 
Honor under section 3741 of such title to James C. McCloughan for the 
acts of valor during the Vietnam War described in subsection (b).
    (b) Acts of Valor Described.--The acts of valor referred to in 
subsection (a) are the actions of James C. McCloughan during combat 
operations of May 13-15, 1969, during the Battle for Nui Yon Hill, for 
which he was previously awarded the Bronze Star Medal with ``V'' 
Device.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2014308DE.01012501.xml

| 29.10.2014 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 308/125 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2014

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 308/125

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 453/2003 des Rates vom 6. März 2003 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 539/2001 zur Aufstellung der Liste der Drittländer, deren Staatsangehörige beim Überschreiten der Außengrenzen im Besitz eines Visums sein müssen, sowie der Liste der Drittländer, deren Staatsangehörige von dieser Visumpflicht befreit sind

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 69 vom 13. März 2003
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 69 vom 13. März 2003

Seite 10, Artikel 1 Nummer 2:

anstatt:

„2.   Ecuador und die Schweiz werden aus der Liste in Anhang I Teil 1 gestrichen.“

muss es heißen:

„2.   Ecuador und die Schweiz werden aus der Liste in Anhang II Teil 1 gestrichen.“

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Earl Dwight REVELS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-7464

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 1, 2017

Decided: November 9, 2017

Earl Dwight Revels, Appellant Pro Se. Michael A. DeFranco, Michael Francis Joseph, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Earl Dwight Revels seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Revels has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 11.0



             STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                FOR THE THREE MONTHS ended SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
                                  (Unaudited)





<TABLE>
<S>                                                     <C>
Assuming no dilution:
  Net less (in thousands                                $     (488)
                                                        ==========
  Weighted average number                          
     of shares:                                    
                                                  
     Average shares outstanding                          2,601,463
                                                        ----------
                                                         2,601,463
                                                        ==========
Loss per share assuming no dilution:                    $    (0.19)
                                                        ==========

Assuming full dilution:
  Net loss (in thousands)                               $     (488)
                                                        ==========
  Weighted average number   
     of shares:             
                                              
     Average shares issued:                              2,817,500
                                                        ----------
                                                        $2,817,500
                                                        ==========
                                              
Loss per share assuming full dilution                   $    (0.17)
                                                        ==========        
</TABLE>
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 136

To authorize representation by Senate Legal Counsel.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 19, 1995

Mr. DOLE (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize representation by Senate Legal Counsel.

Whereas, in the case of United States ex rel. Sequoia Orange

Company v. Sunland Packing House Company, Case No.

CV–F–88–566 OWWW/DLB, and consolidated cases,

pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, a subpoena for testimony at a

hearing has been issued to Senator Dianne Feinstein;

Whereas, by rule VI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no

Senator shall absent himself or herself from the service

of the Senate without leave;

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States

and rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial process, be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the Senate; and
2

SRES 136 ATS

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a)

and 288c(a)(2) (1994), the Senate may direct its counsel

to represent committees, Members, officers, and employees of the Senate with respect to subpoenas or orders issued to them in their official capacity: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is directed

2 to represent Senator Feinstein in connection with the sub3 poena issued to her in these cases.

Æ
#### Moses Sebastian Obam OTIATO, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 17-1897

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 18, 2018

Decided: February 1, 2018

Japheth N. Matemu, MATEMU LAW OFFICE P.C., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Petitioner. Chad A. Readier, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Jessica A. Dawgert, Senior Litigation Counsel, Jacob A: Bashyrov, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D;C., for Respondent.

Before MOTZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Moses Sebastian Obam Otiato, a native and citizen of Kenya, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen and rescind his *in absentia*removal order. We have reviewed' the administrative record and the Board’s order and find no abuse of discre*138tion. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.28(b) (2017). We therefore deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. *See In re Otiato*(B.I.A. July 17, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED*
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keon Marquese GAITHER, a/k/a Sleepy, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-4298

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 30, 2018

Decided: February 1, 2018

*132Sharon Leigh Smith, UNTI & SMITH, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Ashe-ville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Keon Marqúese Gaither pled guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine base, 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a), (b)(1)(C), 846 (2012), and possession of a firearm involved in interstate commerce from which the serial number had been removed or altered, 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(k), 924(a)(1)(B) (2012). The district court sentenced him to 64 months’ imprisonment. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that, in counsel’s view, there are no meritorious issues for appeal, but addressing the validity of Gaither’s waiver of his right to appeal and whether he could raise any issues outside the waiver. Although informed of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief, Gaither has declined to do so. We affirm.

Although Gaither’s plea agreement contains a waiver of the right to appeal his conviction and sentence, because the Government has not sought to enforce the waiver, we decline to enforce it sua sponte. *See United States v. Jones,*667 F.3d 477, 486 (4th Cir. 2012).

We have reviewed the record and conclude that Gaither’s guilty plea was knowing and voluntary and that his sentence is reasonable. *See Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 41, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); *see also United States v. Allen,*491 F.3d 178, 193 (4th Cir. 2007) (applying an appellate presumption of reasonableness to a sentence imposed within a properly calculated advisory Guidelines range).

In accordance with *Anders,*we have reviewed the entire record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore affirm Gaither’s conviction and sentence. This court requires that' counsel inform Gaither, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Gaither requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on Gaither. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 33 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 33

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
               relative to the free exercise of religion.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                  May 3 (legislative day, May 1), 1995

 Mr. Cochran introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
          twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
               relative to the free exercise of religion.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the following article is 
proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, 
which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the 
Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the 
several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to the free 
exercise of religion shall not be denied or abridged by the United 
States or by any State.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by 
appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Loral Space & Communications Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Harvey B. Rein, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Harvey B. ReinHarvey B.
ReinSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


August 9, 2012
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 150 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

  1st Session
S. RES. 150

To authorize testimony by Senate employees and representation by Senate 
                             Legal Counsel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 13 (legislative day, July 10), 1995

    Mr. Dole (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To authorize testimony by Senate employees and representation by Senate 
                             Legal Counsel.
Whereas the plaintiffs in Barnstead Broadcasting Corporation and BAF 
        Enterprises, Inc. v. Offshore Broadcasting Corporation, Civ. No. 94-
        2167, a civil action pending in the United States District Court for the 
        District of Columbia, are seeking the deposition testimony of Barbara 
        Riehle and John Seggerman, Senate employees who work for Senator John 
        Chafee;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be 
        taken from such control or possession but by permission of the Senate;
Whereas when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take 
        such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to represent employees of the Senate with respect to 
        subpoenas or requests for testimony issued or made to them in their 
        official capacities: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Barbara Riehle and John Seggerman are authorized to 
provide deposition testimony in the case of Barnstead Broadcasting 
Corporation and BAF Enterprises, Inc. v. Offshore Broadcasting 
Corporation, except concerning matters for which a privilege should be 
asserted; and
    Sec. 2. That the Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent 
Barbara Riehle and John Seggerman in connection with the deposition 
testimony authorized by this resolution.
                                 <all>
```