alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 54 (Monday, March 21, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 16064]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05939]



[[Page 16064]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #17374 and #17375; MAINE Disaster Number ME-
00063]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Maine

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of MAINE (FEMA-4647-
DR), dated 03/15/2022.
    Incident: Severe Storm and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 10/30/2021 through 10/31/2021.

DATES: Issued on 03/15/2022.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/16/2022.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/15/2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 03/15/2022, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Knox, Waldo, York.
    The Interest Rates are:


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere....     1.875
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere.     1.875
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere.     1.875
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17374 6 
and for economic injury is 17375 0.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Barbara Carson,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2022-05939 Filed 3-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ascencion HERNANDEZ-JIMENEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-50087

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted November 15, 2017 *

Filed November 17, 2017

Colin M. McDonald, Assistant U.S. Attorney, US Department of Justice, Southern District of California, San Diego, CA, Karla Davis, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Helen H. Hong, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the US Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Benjamin P. Lechman, Esquire, Attorney, Lechman *&*Lechman, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant

*647Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Ascension Hernandez-Jimenez challenges the 30-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for attempted reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Hernandez-Jimenez contends that the district court erred by relying on his prior conviction under California Penal Code § 288(a) to impose a 16-level enhancement to his base offense level. We have previously held that a conviction under § 288(a) constitutes “sexual abuse of a minor,” which is a “crime of violence” that warrants a 16-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2. *See United States v. Medina-Villa,*567 F.3d 507, 513 (9th Cir. 2009). We cannot disregard that precedent unless it is “clearly irreconcilable with the reasoning or theory of intervening higher authority.” *Miller v. Gammie,*335 F.3d 889, 892-93 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

Hernandez-Jimenez contends that recent California case law reflects that § 288(a) is broader than the federal definition because a defendant can be found guilty under § 288(a) even if the victim suffered no harm. Even if the California cases cited by Hernandez-Jimenez are “higher authority,” they are not inconsistent with federal law, which holds that, regardless of harm, “sexual conduct involving [children younger than fourteen years old] is per se abusive.” *United States v. Farmer,*627 F.3d 416, 419 (9th Cir. 2010). Nor is our precedent clearly irreconcilable with *Johnson v. United States,*— U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015) or *Moncrieffe v. Holder,*569 U.S. 184, 133 S.Ct. 1678, 185 L.Ed.2d 727 (2013). Since both decisions, we have recognized the continuing force of *Medina-Villa. See. United States v. Rocha-Alvarado,*843 F.3d 802, 808 (9th Cir. 2016), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 2214, 198 L.Ed.2d 661 (2017).

AFFIRMED.

**

 xhis disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

M ay 22 , 2019 

# Order

Clerk May 22 , 2019

157930 (20 )

IN THE MATTER OF

THERESA M. BRENNAN, JUDGE

53rd DISTRICT COURT SC: 157930

JTC Formal Complaint No. 99

BEFORE THE JUDICIAL TENURE COMMISSION

____________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of respondent judge to file a corrected

brief in support of the petition is GRANTED. The corrected brief submitted on May 21

, 2019, is accepted for filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           12,575
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     6,264
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (360)
<INVENTORY>                                       2,968
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 21,650
<PP&E>                                          592,997
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (257,242)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  358,840
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            25,067
<BONDS>                                         143,222
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                          32
<COMMON>                                            161
<OTHER-SE>                                      183,283
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    358,840
<SALES>                                          37,798
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 38,964
<CGS>                                            27,065
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    33,479
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     18
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                6,608
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (1,197)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (1,197)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (1,197)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (.27)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31,
2010 of Ruby Creek
Resources, Inc (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





ROB
      SLAVIKRob
      Slavik, President, Chief Executive Officer, DirectorDecember
      13, 2010
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Citizens First Financial Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, C.
William Landefeld, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|                                            |  | 
|------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/             
      C. William Landefeld |  | 
|C. William Landefeld                        |  | 
|Chief Executive Officer                     |  | 
|August 14, 2003                             |  | 

23
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 10 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 10

  Electing C. Abbott Saffold as the Secretary for the minority of the 
                                Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Daschle submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Electing C. Abbott Saffold as the Secretary for the minority of the 
                                Senate.

    Resolved, That C. Abbott Saffold be and she is hereby elected 
Secretary for the minority of the Senate, beginning January 4, 1995.
                                 <all>
```
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ No. 1D 20

- 2106

_____________________________ L ARRY P RIDE , Petitioner ,

v.
S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus

— Original Jurisdiction

.

September 18 , 2020

P ER C URIAM

. D ENIED

. R OBERTS , O STERHAUS , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Larry Pride, pro se , Petitioner

.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent

.
Exhibit 15.1

[LETTERHEAD OF WALKERS]



|                                                                                                                  |  |                         
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|30 March 2007                                                                                                     |  | Our Ref: LY/P0540-H01168
|                                                                                                                  |  |                         
|Melco PBL Entertainment (Macau) Limited The
Penthouse 38th Floor The Centrium 60 Wyndham Street Central Hong Kong |  |                         

Dear Sirs

MELCO
PBL ENTERTAINMENT (MACAU) LIMITED (the Company)

We hereby consent to the reference to our firm under the heading Board
Practices and Item 10H in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended 31 December 2006, which will be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on 30 March 2007 under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the Securities Act). In giving such consent, we do not thereby admit that we come within the category of persons whose consent is required under the Securities Act, or the Rules and Regulations of the Commission
thereunder.

Your faithfully

/s/ Walkers

WALKERS
# Official Journal L 128/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 128 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6323 April 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 128

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6323 April 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/557 of 22 April 2020 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 988/2014 as regards Union tariff quotas for certain agricultural products originating in the Republic of Moldova | 1 |
| | | RULES OF PROCEDURE |
| | * | Decision of the Administrative Board of the European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators of 12 December 2019 on internal rules concerning restrictions of certain rights of data subjects in relation to processing of personal data in the framework of the functioning of the Agency | 5 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/557 of 22 April 2020 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 988/2014 as regards Union tariff quotas for certain agricultural products originating in the Republic of Moldova

1

RULES OF PROCEDURE

*

Decision of the Administrative Board of the European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators of 12 December 2019 on internal rules concerning restrictions of certain rights of data subjects in relation to processing of personal data in the framework of the functioning of the Agency

5

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
**EXHIBIT
      32.**  **2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**





**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Homeland Security Capital Corporation
      (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, as
      filed
      with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below,
      hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
      knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




**HOMELAND
                    SECURITY CAPITAL CORPORATION**Dated:
                      November 14, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Michael
              T. BriganteName:Michael
                      T. BriganteTitle:Chief
                    Financial Officer and
                  Principal Accounting
                    Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Homeland Security Capital Corporation
      and
      will be retained by Homeland Security Capital Corporation and furnished to
      the
      United States Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon
      request.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12** 

**- 1111** 

FRANCIS DANIEL OWENS

,

Petitioner

,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General

,

Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted : July 13, 2012 Decided: August 1, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, WYNN , and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington, Virginia

, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Senior Litigation Counsel, Leslie McKay , Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are no t binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Francis Daniel Owens , a native a nd citizen of The

Gambia

, petitions for review of an order of the Board of

Immigrati on Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal from the

immigration judge’s denial of his mo tion to reopen immigration

proceedings . We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order

and find no abuse of discretion

. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(3)

(2012). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the

reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Owens (B.I.A. Dec. 20,

2011 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

PETITION DENIED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KENNETH AARON SHINEDLING, 

Guardian Ad Litem for A.L.S, A.C.S and 

A.A.S.; et al., 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

 v. 

SUNBEAM PRODUCTS, INC., a Delaware 

Corporation, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-56891 

D.C. No. 

5:12-cv-00438-CJC-SP 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Cormac J. Carney, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 12, 2017

Pasadena, California

Before: KOZINSKI and OWENS, Circuit Judges, and WILKEN,** Senior District 

Judge.

1. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, substantial 

evidence supports the jury’s finding that Sunbeam Products, Inc.’s warnings were 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable Claudia Wilken, United States Senior District Judge 

for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

FILED

JUN 30 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

inadequate to alert plaintiffs of the fire risks associated with the space heater, 

particularly the danger of using the heater while sleeping. See Jackson v. Deft,

Inc., 273 Cal. Rptr. 214, 223 (Ct. App. 1990) (“In most cases . . . the adequacy of a 

warning is a question of fact for the jury.”); see also Harper v. City of Los Angeles, 

533 F.3d 1010, 1021 (9th Cir. 2008).

2. Regarding bystander damages, there is substantial evidence that the girls 

were “present at the scene of the injury-producing event at the time it occur[red] 

and [were] then aware that it [was] causing injury to the victim.” Thing v. La 

Chusa, 771 P.2d 814, 815 (Cal. 1989). The jury was able to find that the girls 

could have had “very little doubt” that their mother was “in the house that [they] 

saw engulfed in flames.” In re Air Crash Disaster Near Cerritos, California, On 

Aug. 31, 1986 (Estrada), 967 F.2d 1421, 1425 (9th Cir. 1992). As in Estrada, 

“[t]he injury-producing event was the fire,” and the girls were not required to be 

aware of its cause. Id.; see also Fortman v. Förvaltningsbolaget Insulan AB, 151 

Cal. Rptr. 3d 320, 329 n.4 (Ct. App. 2013).

3. Finally, substantial evidence supports the amount of emotional distress 

damages awarded to the girls, and the district court did not abuse its discretion by

denying Sunbeam’s motion for a new trial based on excessive damages. 

See Gasperini v. Ctr. for Humanities, Inc., 518 U.S. 415, 435-36 (1996); Toscano 

v. Greene Music, 21 Cal. Rptr. 3d 732, 736 (Ct. App. 2004) (Under California law, 
3 

“[t]he amount of damages . . . is a fact question committed to the discretion of the 

trial judge on a motion for new trial; an award of damages will not be disturbed if 

it is supported by substantial evidence.”). 

AFFIRMED.
**Important legal notice**

*|*

# 12006E139

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE XI - Social policy, education, vocational training and youth - Chapter 1 - Social provisions - Article 139***Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0109 - 0109 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0095 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0241 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0045 - Consolidated version*

Article 139

1. Should management and labour so desire, the dialogue between them at Community level may lead to contractual relations, including agreements.

2. Agreements concluded at Community level shall be implemented either in accordance with the procedures and practices specific to management and labour and the Member States or, in matters covered by Article 137, at the joint request of the signatory parties, by a Council decision on a proposal from the Commission.

The Council shall act by qualified majority, except where the agreement in question contains one or more provisions relating to one of the areas for which unanimity is required pursuant to Article 137(2). In that case, it shall act unanimously.

--------------------------------------------------