alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          67,962                 106,910
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,190                   3,502
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (485)                    (58)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,784                 111,189
<PP&E>                                          22,528                  11,487
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (9,061)                 (5,594)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 795,502                 416,725
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,903                  10,498
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           831                     715
<OTHER-SE>                                     777,923                 402,953
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   795,502                 416,725
<SALES>                                         68,910                  15,238
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                68,910                  15,238
<CGS>                                           51,664                   6,044
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  144,395                  12,408
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                   2,830
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (3,223)                       1
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (72,262)                   2,829
<INCOME-TAX>                                       182                   2,993
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (72,444)                   (164)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (72,444)                   (164)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.99)                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.99)                       0


</TABLE>
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #17368 and #17369; VIRGINIA Disaster Number VA-00099]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the Commonwealth of Virginia (FEMA-4644-DR), dated 03/11/2022. *Incident:*
                         Severe Winter Storm and Snowstorm. *Incident Period:*
                         01/02/2022 through 01/03/2022.
 DATES: Issued on 03/11/2022. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/10/2022. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         12/12/2022.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 03/11/2022, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Albemarle, Amelia, Appomattox, Bedford, Buckingham, Caroline, Charlotte, Culpeper, Cumberland, Essex, Fauquier, Fluvanna, Fredericksburg City, Goochland, Greene, Hanover, King George, King William, Louisa, Madison, Nelson, Orange, Powhatan, Prince Edward, Rappahannock, Spotsylvania, Stafford, Westmoreland. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17368 B and for economic injury is 17369 0. 
 
 (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Barbara Carson, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2022-05729 Filed 3-17-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134172 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134172 COA: 265843 Genesee CC: 05-016127-FC ROBERT THOMAS PARKS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 20, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered. We DIRECT the Genesee County Prosecuting Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this order.

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.

s1017 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 24, 2007

Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 291 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 291

  To designate November 18, 1996, as ``American Free Enterprise Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 13, 1996

Mr. Brown submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  To designate November 18, 1996, as ``American Free Enterprise Day''.

Whereas American prosperity is founded on the free enterprise system of 
        individual opportunity and economic freedom;
Whereas the roots of American free enterprise can be found in the experiences of 
        the people of Jamestown and Plymouth, the earliest American colonies;
Whereas the basis of free enterprise is the right to ownership of private 
        property, which ensures to individuals the fruits of their own labor and 
        encourages the virtues of self-reliance, thrift, and industriousness;
Whereas the settlers at Jamestown and Plymouth were initially deprived of the 
        fruits of their own labor and therefore lacked the incentive for private 
        initiative and hard work;
Whereas William Bradford, Governor of the Plymouth Plantation, wrote that in 
        response to the misery and want experienced by the people of Plymouth he 
        decided ``that they should set corn every man for his own particular; 
        and that regard trust to themselves . . . . This had very good success, 
        for it made all hands very industrious, so as much more corn was planted 
        than otherwise would have been by any means the Governor or any other 
        could use.'';
Whereas on November 18, 1618, ``The Great Charter'' endowed the colonists of 
        Virginia with the right to profit from property under their individual 
        control for the first time; and
Whereas the result of the Great Charter was a blossoming of individual 
        initiative and self-sufficiency that laid the foundations for the 
        American tradition of economic freedom, prosperity, and self-government: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) commends the men and women of our first colonies who 
        began the American tradition of hard work and individual 
        initiative;
            (2) honors all those who have defended the right of 
        individuals to own property, pursue their own initiative, and 
        to reap the fruits of their own labor; and
            (3) designates November 18, 1996, as ``American Free 
        Enterprise Day''.
The President is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation 
calling upon the people of the United States and Federal, State, and 
local administrators to observe the day with appropriate programs, 
ceremonies, and activities.
                                 <all>
```
No. 07-18-00243-CR

Juslet Joseph

 Appellant

v.

The State of Texas

 Appellee

§

§

§

§

From the 181st District Court

 of Potter County

July 16, 2018

Opinion Per Curiam

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated July 16, 2018, it is ordered, adjudged

and decreed that the appeal is abated, and the cause is remanded to the 181st District

Court of Potter County, Texas for further proceedings in accordance with this Court’s

opinion entered this day.

o O o

FILE COPY
#### Ian Aulden CAMPBELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald W. STEPHENS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-7149

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 21, 2017

Decided: November 28, 2017

Bruce Tracy Cunningham, Jr., LAW OFFICE OF BRUCE T. CUNNINGHAM, JR., Southern Pines, North Carolina, for Appellant.

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ian Aulden Campbell appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint in which he alleged that the state court judge who denied his post-conviction motion for appropriate relief violated his rights to due process because the judge lacked the appearance of impartiality. Campbell’s claims are without merit. *See Tumey v. Ohio,*273 U.S. 510, 523, 47 S.Ct. 437, 71 L.Ed. 749 (1927) (discussing lack of appearance of impartiality of deciding judge as violation of defendant’s rights to due process). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Exhibit 10.26




Waiver and Release
  
  This Waiver (this “Waiver”) is made as of October 27, 2010, between CleanTech Innovations, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and Wonderful Limited (“Wonderful”).
  In consideration of the release by the Company below, Wonderful hereby consents and agrees to waive all rights to the payment of RMB 1,136,800 due under the Approval on Share Transfer Regarding Creative Bellows Manufacture Co., Ltd., dated September 15, 2010, from the Department of Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation of Liaoning Province.
  In consideration for the execution of the Waiver, the Company does hereby release and forever discharge Wonderful and its successors and assigns of and from all claims, actions, causes of action, liability, demands and damages of whatever name or nature, whether at law or in equity, in any manner having arisen, arising, or to arise from the beginning of time to the date hereof.
   CLEANTECH INNOVATIONS, INC.
  /s/ Bei Lu
 By: Bei Lu
 Title: Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
   WONDERFUL LIMITED
  /s/ Gloria Lam
 By: Gloria Lam
 Title: Director
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6525 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to require 

students to undergo lead screenings. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 8, 2016 

Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

of 1965 to require students to undergo lead screenings. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lead-free Students 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LEAD SCREENING. 

7 Subpart 2 of part F of title VIII of the Elementary 

8 and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7901 

9 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6525 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 8549D. LEAD SCREENING REQUIREMENT. 

2 ‘‘As a condition of receiving funds under this Act, a 

3 local educational agency shall require that prior to enroll4 ing in an elementary school for the first time, a student 

5 shall undergo a screening of the student’s blood lead 

6 level.’’. 

7 SEC. 3. TABLE OF CONTENTS. 

8 The table of contents in section 2 of the Elementary 

9 and Secondary Education Act of 1965 is amended by in10 serting after the item relating to section 8549C the fol11 lowing: 

‘‘Sec. 8549D. Lead screening requirement.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### William Lebron Andrew CHURCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Jointly and Severally; William Muse, Chairman, Jointly and Severally; Karen D. Brown, Chairman, Virginia Parole Board, Jointly and Severally; Terry Glenn, Virginia Department of Corrections, Interstate Compact Coordinator, Jointly and Severally; Ombudsman, Virginia Dept. Corrections, Jointly and Severally; Lt. Ronald C. Maxey, Virginia State Police, Criminal Justice Information, Jointly and Severally, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-7188

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 30, 2018

Decided: February 2, 2018

William Lebrón Andrew Church, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Lebrón Andrew Church appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Church v. Dir., Va. Dep’t of Corr.,*No. 3:16-cv-00845-HEH-RCY (E.D. Va. Aug. 16, 2017). We also deny Church’s motion for a declaration regarding the constitutionality of the procedures of the Virginia Parole' Board. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
NO. 4-02-0846

	IN THE APPELLATE COURT

	OF ILLINOIS

	FOURTH DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,	)	Appeal from

		Plaintiff-Appellee,			)	Circuit Court of

		v.						)	Pike County

CHARLES L. GOEWEY,					)	Nos. 01CF77

		Defendant-Appellant.		)		01CF84

								)		01CF95	

								)	

								)	Honorable

								)	Michael R. Roseberry,

								)	Judge Presiding.

__________________________________________________________________

		JUSTICE COOK delivered the opinion of the court:

		On April 12, 2002, defendant, Charles Goewey, pleaded

guilty to one charge of escape (720 ILCS 5/31-6(a) (West 2002))

and two charges of burglary (720 ILCS 5/19-1 (West 2002)).  Prior

to the plea, defendant and the State agreed that the sentences

would run concurrently, but that they would have to run consecu

tively to the charge for possession of a controlled substance

that was pending before another court.  After the State recited

the factual basis for the pleas, the trial court determined that

the State presented an adequate factual basis and that the pleas

were voluntary and understandingly and knowingly made.

		On May 7, 2002, the trial court sentenced defendant to

three six-year sentences for the escape and burglary counts. 

These sentences were to run concurrently to one another and

consecutively to separate sentences of possession of a controlled

substance and aggravated battery.  After sentencing defendant,

the court did not properly admonish him pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 605(c) (Official Reports Advance Sheet No. 21 (October 17,

2001), R. 605(c), amended` eff. October 1, 2001) regarding the actions

necessary to preserve his right to appeal.  Specifically, the

trial court incorrectly indicated that if defendant filed a

motion to reconsider his sentence within 30 days, that would be

enough to preserve his right to appeal.

		On May 22, 2002, defendant filed a pro se motion for reduction of sentence in all three cases.  Counsel was appointed

to represent defendant and a hearing was held on the motion on

August 27, 2002.  The trial court denied the motion.  This appeal

followed.

		In this matter, the State concedes that defendant was

improperly admonished pursuant to Rule 605(c).  We must agree.  A

trial judge must strictly comply with the dictates of the rule,

and fundamental fairness requires that when the trial court

erroneously advises a negotiated-plea defendant that a motion to

reconsider the sentence will preserve his right to appeal, the

cause be remanded to the trial court with instructions to cor

rectly admonish the defendant and provide him with an opportunity

to withdraw his guilty plea.  People v. Diaz, 192 Ill. 2d 211, 226-27, 735 N.E.2d 605, 613 (2000).

		Because the trial court failed to comply with the

admonishment requirements of Supreme Court Rule 605(c), we remand

the cause with directions  toand Goewey be properly admonished defendant under

Rule 605(c) and given him the opportunity to move to have his

guilty plea withdrawn, should he so desire.

		Remanded with directions.

		APPLETON and McCULLOUGH, JJ., concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Francisco SERVANDO-TRUJILLO, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-41502 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed June 16, 2017

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Jose Francisco Servando-Trujillo, Pro Se

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Francisco Servando-Tru-jillo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Servando-Trujillo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the récord reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo-lous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

**Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
### FOR PUBLICATION 

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT



#  T HEW ILDERNESS S OCIETY ; P RAIRIE F ALCONA UDUBON , I NC .,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v. U NITED S TATES F OREST S ERVICE ; J ANEP. K OLLMEYER ; S COTT C. No. 09-35200 N ANNENGA , D.C. No.

Defendants-Appellees, 

#  4:08-cv-00363-EJL and ORDER M AGIC V ALLEY T RAILM ACHINE A SSOCIATION ; I DAHO R ECREATION C OUNCIL ; B LUERIBBONC OALITION , I NC ., Defendants-IntervenorsAppellants. 

# 

Filed September 30, 2010

ORDER
KOZINSKI , Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be heard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

16763
Exhibit









Exhibit 10.31





AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO THE GLOBAL EAGLE ENTERTAINMENT INC.
2016 INDUCEMENT AND RETENTION STOCK PLAN FOR EMC EMPLOYEES


Adopted December 5, 2016


WHEREAS, Global Eagle Ente1tainment Inc. (the "Company") has established and maintains the Global Eagle Entertainment Inc. 2016 Inducement and Retention Stock Plan for EMC Employees (the "Plan"); and


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 9(a) of the Plan, the Committee (as defined in the Plan) has the power to amend the Plan.


NOW, THEREFORE, the Committee hereby amends the Plan as follows:


1.Amendment. Section 7 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following new subsection (d):


"(d) Repricing and Buybacks Prohibited. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, and except for the adjustments provided in Section 9(b), neither the Committee nor any other person may decrease the exercise price for any outstanding Nonqualified Stock Option after the date of grant nor cancel, repurchase or replace an outstanding underwater Nonqualified Stock Option in exchange for cash, other Awards, new Nonqualified Stock Options with a lower exercise price or any other cash or equity incentive awards."


2.    No Other Changes. Except as specifically amended hereby, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects and remains in full force and effect.




(Remainder of page intentionally left blank.)










IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment No. 1 to the Plan to be executed by the undersigned.


	
			
	 
	GLOBAL EAGLE ENTERTAINMENT INC.

	 
	 
	 

	 
	By:
	/s/ Stephen Ballas

	 
	 
	 

	 
	Name:
	Stephen Ballas

	 
	 
	 

	 
	Title:
	Executive Vice President and General Counsel