alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 13.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Trina Solar Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jifan Gao, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 26, 2008



|       |  |                                     
|------ |  | ------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Jifan Gao                       
|Name:  |  | Jifan Gao                           
|Title: |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



1
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Victor Hugo MORENO-ONTIVEROS, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-10213 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 20, 2017

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Victor Hugo Moreno-Ontiveros, Pro Se

Before JONES, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Victor Hugo Moreno-Ontive-ros has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Moreno-Ontiveros has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo-*250lous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir, R, 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
## SERVE D JUN E1,201 0 U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N f^-o i Q Z- • '.iqon'^T/giQ^

i OFFIC EO FHEARING S ' ' " ^ ^ ^ S WASHINGTON , D C I N TH E MATTERO F PETE RZ . SIMON S FA A DOCKE T NO . CP10NM000 4 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DM S No . FAA-2010-053 4

NOTIC EO FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofor e designateda s Cas e No . 2009NM700173 ) ha s bee n assigne d t o Administrativ e La w Judg e Richar dC . Goodwin . Al l future pleading s an dothe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do n th e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , an dth e othe r

person s o n th e attache dServic e List .

Rormi e A . Chie f Administrat i Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No . CP10NM000 4 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON E COP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Pete r Z . Simons , Responden t 221 6 N . Farragu t

Avenu e Colorad o Springs , C O 8090 7 Scot t R . Morris , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f Regiona l Counse l Northwes t

Mountai n Region , ANM- 7 Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 160 1 Lin dAvenue , S.W . Renton , W

A 9805 7 TEL : 425-227-200 7 FAX : 425-227-100 7 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Legal Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service was b

y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n person o r b y expeditedcourier , us e the followin g address : Federa

l Aviation Administration , 600 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 .
# L_2005056EN.01003601.xml

| 2.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 56/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 56/36

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2336/2003 of 30 December 2003 introducing certain detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 670/2003 laying down specific measures concerning the market in ethyl alcohol of agricultural origin

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 346 of 31 December 2003
  )

On page 20, the first two lines of Article 5(3):

for:

for:

‘Applications for import and export licences for alcohol of agricultural origin ...’,

read:

read:

‘Applications for import licences and import licences for alcohol of agricultural origin ...’.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 25 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 25

  Relating to section 6 of Senate Resolution 458 of the 98th Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Lott submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Relating to section 6 of Senate Resolution 458 of the 98th Congress.

    Resolved, That, for the purpose of section 6 of Senate Resolution 
458 of the 98th Congress (agreed to October 4, 1984), the term 
``displaced staff member'' includes an employee in the office of the 
Minority Whip who was an employee in that office on January 1, 1995, 
and whose service is terminated on or after January 1, 1995, solely and 
directly as a result of the change of the individual occupying the 
position of Minority Whip and who is so certified by the individual who 
was the Minority Whip on January 1, 1995.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 26 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 26

  Designating April 9, 1995, and April 9, 1996, as ``National Former 
                   Prisoner of War Recognition Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 31 (legislative day, January 30), 1995

Mr. Simpson (for himself, Mr. Rockefeller, Mr. Thurmond, Mr. Murkowski, 
  Mr. Jeffords, Mr. Craig, Mr. Graham, and Mr. Akaka) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Designating April 9, 1995, and April 9, 1996, as ``National Former 
                   Prisoner of War Recognition Day''.

Whereas the United States has fought in many wars;
Whereas thousands of members of the Armed Forces of the United States who served 
        in such wars were captured by the enemy and held as prisoners of war;
Whereas many such prisoners of war were subjected to brutal and inhumane 
        treatment by their captors in violation of international codes and 
        customs for the treatment of prisoners of war and died, or were 
        disabled, as a result of such treatment; and
Whereas the great sacrifices of such prisoners of war and their families deserve 
        national recognition: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That April 9, 1995, and April 
9, 1996, are designated as ``National Former Prisoner of War 
Recognition Day'' in honor of the members of the Armed Forces of the 
United States who have been held as prisoners of war, and the President 
is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the 
people of the United States to commemorate such day with appropriate 
ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 19-60525

Summary Calendar

Sandra Elizabeth Posadas-Tobar, 

Petitioner,

versus

William P. Barr, U. S. Attorney General, 

Respondent.

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A200 939 023

Before Higginbotham, Jones, and Costa, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Sandra Elizabeth Posadas-Tobar, a native and citizen of Honduras, 

petitions for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) 

dismissing her appeal of the immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of her motion to 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 25, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-60525 Document: 00515540724 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/25/2020
No. 19-60525

2

reopen her in absentia removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction to review 

the denial of this motion. See Mata v. Lynch, 576 U.S. 143, 146-48 (2015).

We review the BIA’s denials of motion to reopen under a “highly 

deferential abuse-of-discretion standard, regardless of the basis of the alien’s 

request for relief.” Gomez-Palacios v. Holder, 560 F.3d 354, 358 (5th Cir. 

2009). We will not reverse the BIA’s decision “as long as it is not capricious, 

without foundation in the evidence, or otherwise so irrational that it is 

arbitrary rather than the result of any perceptible rational approach.” Id. 

Posadas-Tobar asserts that she did not receive notice of her removal 

hearing, maintaining that she provided a correct address to immigration 

officials upon her release but that they misspelled the street name. Despite 

Posadas-Tobar’s affidavit to the contrary, the record evidence, including the 

Form I-830, does not compel the conclusion that the BIA erred by finding 

that she provided the apparently incorrect address, to which the notice of 

hearing was mailed, to immigration officials. See id.; see also 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1229a(b)(5)(B). In addition, Mauricio-Benitez v. Sessions, 908 F.3d 144, 149

(5th Cir. 2018), cert. denied, 139 S. Ct. 2767 (2019), and Pierre-Paul v. Barr, 

930 F.3d 684, 689-93 (5th Cir. 2019), cert. denied, 2020 WL 1978950 (U.S. 

Apr. 27, 2020) (No. 19-779), foreclose Posadas-Tobar’s argument that 

jurisdiction never vested in the immigration court because the notice was 

sent to an incorrect address. See Pereira v. Sessions, 138 S. Ct. 2105, 2110 

(2018). 

The petition for review is DENIED.

 Case: 19-60525 Document: 00515540724 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/25/2020
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 690 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 135
114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 690

                          [Report No. 114-183]

   To require each agency, in providing notice of a rule making, to 
  include a link to a 100 word plain language summary of the proposed 
                                 rule.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 2015

 Mr. Luetkemeyer (for himself and Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

                             June 25, 2015

Additional sponsors: Mr. Graves of Missouri, Mrs. Wagner, Mr. Long, and 
                               Mr. Babin

                             June 25, 2015

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require each agency, in providing notice of a rule making, to 
  include a link to a 100 word plain language summary of the proposed 
                                 rule.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Providing Accountability Through 
Transparency Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO POST A 100 WORD SUMMARY TO REGULATIONS.GOV.

    Section 553(b) of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2) by striking ``; and'' and inserting 
        ``;'';
            (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following:
            ``(4) the internet address of a summary of not more than 
        100 words in length of the proposed rule, in plain language, 
        that shall be posted on the internet website under section 
        206(d) of the E-Government Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. 3501 note) 
        (commonly known as regulations.gov);''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 135

114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 690

                          [Report No. 114-183]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To require each agency, in providing notice of a rule making, to 
  include a link to a 100 word plain language summary of the proposed 
                                 rule.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 25, 2015

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Joe Dell STERLING, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40492 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed January 11, 2018

Terri Lynn Hagan, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Texas, Plano, TX, Traci Lynne Kenner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Texas, Tyler, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Joe Dell Sterling, Pro Se

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and DENNIS and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Joe Dell Sterling, federal prisoner # 18324-078, challenges the denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion, urging that the district court erred in determining that he was ineligible for a sentencing reduction. He asserts that his sentence was tied to a guidelines range as his factual resume stipulated that he was aware that the conspiracy involved 1000 kilograms or more of marijuana, which resulted in the same base offense level as was used by the probation officer. As a result, Sterling contends that his sentence, which exceeded the guidelines range calculated by the probation officer, constituted an upward departure and that he was entitled to a commensurate departure under the newly applicable guidelines range.

As the district court determined, appellant was not eligible for a reduction because his sentence was not “based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission.” § 3582(c)(2). Rather, the district court sentenced appellant to 240 months in prison based on his binding agreement under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(C). *See Freeman v. United States,*
      *218564 U.S. 522, 584-40, 131 S.Ct. 2685, 180 L.Ed.2d 519 (2011) (Sotomayor, J., concurring); *United States v. Benitez,*822 F.3d 807, 809-12 (5th Cir. 2016). Therefore, the district court’s denial of a sentence reduction is AFFIRMED. *See Freeman,*564 U.S. at 534-40, 131 S.Ct. 2685 (Sotomayor, J., concurring); *Benitez,*822 F.3d at 809-12.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R, 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 12.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

I, Sean Shao, Chief Financial Officer of Trina Solar Limited (the Company), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of the Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and we have:

(a) Designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the
effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the periods covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the Companys auditors and the audit committee of Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date: June 12, 2007



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Sean Shao          
|Name:  |  | Sean Shao              
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### David Lee GARNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John COHEN, The FBI Headquarters Director; Robert S. Mueller, III; CIA Director Leon Panetta; Former Millem Hayden; John Roberts, The U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice; The US District Court of Charleston SC; Patrick Michael Duffy, SC District Court Judge; FBI of Williamsport, PA; FBI Agent Michael Hudak, Defendants-Appellees.

*271No. 17-6935

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 21, 2017

Decided: November 28, 2017

David Lee Garner, Appellant Pro Se,

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Lee Garner appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) his complaint filed pursuant to *Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of*Fed. *Bureau of Narcotics,*403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. *Garner v. Cohen,*No. 2:16-cv-00561-TLW, 2017 WL 2645754 (D.S.C. June 20, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Microsoft

December 26, 2013

VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION

The Rules Docket (AGC 200)

Federal Aviation Administration

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

Re: Renewal of Exemption No. 9996, Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2009-1034

The letter serves as a request for a renewal of Exemption No 9996, Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2009-

1034, currently due to expire January 31, 2014

The North Bay Air Museum is operating North American F-51-D (registration No. N51GP, serial No 44-

74483) and a Curtiss P-40-N5, registration No. N540TP serial No. 42-105306, for the purpose of carrying 

passengers for hire on local flights for educational and instructional purposes under the terms and 

conditions of Exemption 9996.

The North Bay Air Museum continues to hold a determination from the IRS as a 501(c)(3) charitable 

organization and all the conditions associated with our program and the reasons presented with our 

original petition remain unchanged.

Please feel free to contact me at (707) 934-5158 with any questions you may have. Thank you for your 

time and attention.

Sincerely,

Sheryl Carlucci

Executive Director

North Bay Air Museum