alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 7 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                         Calendar No. 9
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 7

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
clarify the intent of the Constitution to neither prohibit nor require 
                         public school prayer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 1995

  Mr. Byrd (for himself and Mr. Helms) introduced the following joint 
               resolution; which was read the first time

                            January 5, 1995

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
clarify the intent of the Constitution to neither prohibit nor require 
                         public school prayer.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution, which shall be valid to all intents and 
purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures 
of three-fourths of the several States within seven years after the 
date of its submission to the States for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Nothing in this Constitution, or amendments thereto, 
shall be construed to prohibit or require voluntary prayer in public 
schools, or to prohibit or require voluntary prayer at public school 
extracurricular activities.''.
                                     

                                                         Calendar No. 9

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              S. J. RES. 7

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
clarify the intent of the Constitution to neither prohibit nor require 
                         public school prayer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            January 5, 1995

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains financial information extracted from Balance Sheet,
Statement of Operations, Statement of Cash Flows and Notes thereto incorporated
in Part I of this Form 10Q-SB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         143,603
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   77,749
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    685,365
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,073,413
<PP&E>                                       4,060,124
<DEPRECIATION>                               (851,019)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,680,352
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,726,358
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,290
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,496,624
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,680,352
<SALES>                                        160,777
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               160,777
<CGS>                                          105,934
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  105,934
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,833,208
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             153,417
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,856,081)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,856,081)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.80)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.80)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 184 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 184

Making majority party appointments to certain Senate committees for the 
                            104th Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             October 12 (legislative day, October 10), 1995

Mr. Kempthorne (for Mr. Dole) submitted the following resolution; which 
                      was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Making majority party appointments to certain Senate committees for the 
                            104th Congress.

    Resolved, That the following shall constitute the majority party's 
membership on the following standing committees for the 104th Congress, 
or until their successors are chosen:
    Committee on Agriculture: Mr. Lugar, Mr. Dole, Mr. Helms, Mr. 
Cochran, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Craig, Mr. Coverdell, Mr. Santorum, Mr. 
Warner, and Mr. Grassley.
    Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs: Mr. D'Amato, Mr. 
Gramm, Mr. Shelby, Mr. Bond, Mr. Mack, Mr. Faircloth, Mr. Bennett, Mr. 
Grams, and Mr. Domenici.
    Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation: Mr. Pressler, 
Mr. Stevens, Mr. McCain, Mr. Burns, Mr. Gorton, Mr. Lott, Mrs. 
Hutchison, Ms. Snowe, Mr. Ashcroft, and Mr. Frist.
    Committee on Governmental Affairs: Mr. Stevens, Mr. Roth, Mr. 
Cohen, Mr. Thompson, Mr. Cochran, Mr. McCain, Mr. Smith, and Mr. Brown.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED




PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the report of Fuqi International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Yu Kwai ChongYu
      Kwai Chong
                      Chief
      Executive Officer and President
                      May
      12, 2009





/s/ Ching Wan WongChing
      Wan Wong
                      Chief
      Financial Officer
                      May
      12, 2009




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Fuqi International, Inc. and will be retained by Fuqi International,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request
#### Darren M. NANCE, Appellant v. CITY OF NEWARK; Newark Police Department; The Mayor, Sharpe James; Joseph J. Santiago; Thomas C. O’Reilly; Robert K. Rankin, Jr.; Mitchell McQuire; Michael O’Connor; James David O’Connor; Willie E. Underwood; Irving B. Guller; Jose Omar Colon; Chadrakant Patel; James E. Tunis; Isabella Castellanos; Vincent Bongermino; John Does (1-10); Richard Paraboschi; Nicholas Maresca; Anthony Campos; John Zakowski

No. 16-4450

Upited States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

February 1, 2018

Samuel J. Halpern, Esq., West Orange, NJ, for Plaintiff-Appellant

John S. Favate, Esq., George R. Hardin, Esq., Hardin Kundla McKeon & Poletto, Springfield, NJ, for Defendant-Appellee

Stefani C. Schwartz, Esq., Schwartz Simon Edelstein *&*Celso, Whippany, NJ, for Defendant

Before: AMBRO, KRAUSE, Circuit Judges and CONTI *, Chief District Judge

*

 Honorable Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti, District Court Judge for the Western District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation.

SUR PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING

Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge

The petition for panel rehearing filed by Appellant in the above entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court. Appellant’s Reply was considered by the Court. It is hereby ORDERED that the petition for rehearing by the panel is GRANTED, in part and the Opinion and Judgment entered October 27, 2017 are vacated. A new Opinion and Judgment will be filed forthwith.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Solomon Nordine, Chief Financial Officer of Border
Management, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Border Management, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 2007 (the 'Report') fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Border
Management, Inc.

Dated: March 27, 2008

/s/ Solomon Nordine
------------------
Solomon Nordine
Chief Financial Officer,
Border Management, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Border Management,
Inc. and will be retained by Border Management, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund IV, L.P. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, H. Kerr Taylor, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in my capacity as an
officer of the General Partner of the Company, that, to my knowledge:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                     
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and               
| |    |                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                     |  |       |  |                                                                                                                                                             |  | 
|-------------------- |  | ----- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: March
31, 2011 |  | By:   |  | /s/ H. Kerr
Taylor                                                                                                                                          |  | 
|                     |  | Name: |  | H. Kerr
Taylor                                                                                                                                              |  | 
|                     |  | Title |  | President
and Chief Executive Officer of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth IV
Corporation, the General Partner of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund
IV, L.P. |  | 

---
* Pursuant to Fift h Circuit Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limit ed ci rcumstances set f

orth in Fift h Circuit Rule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 30, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________ No. 05-20824

____________ IN RE: TRI-UNION DEVELOPMENT CORP. Debtor. ARCH W. HELTON; HELTON PROPERTIES, INC.

Appellants, versus TRI-UNION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,

Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas No. 4:04-CV-2013 Before GARWOOD, BARKSDALE, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *-2-

Aft er reviewing th e record in this case and considering the briefs of the parties and arguments of counsel, we affirm th e District Court's Judgment essentially fo r the reasons stated in it s Order dated July 29, 2005 . The Bankruptcy Court correctl y co ncluded, and the District Court correctly affirmed, th at summary judgment should be gr anted to Tri -Union Development Corp. on the Appellants’ claims of drainage on th e 7900' sand, underpayment of roy alt ie s or working int erest payments on th e 8100' sand, and underpayment of roy alt ies or working int erest payments on the 8550' sand. As a result, the Appellants are not entitled to an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 733 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 733

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to require households that 
     receive supplemental nutrition assistance benefits to present 
   photographic verification at the time food is purchased with such 
                               benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2015

  Mr. Salmon (for himself, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Bridenstine, Mr. Long, Mr. 
 DeSantis, Mr. Schweikert, Mrs. Lummis, Mr. Franks of Arizona, and Mr. 
Poe of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to require households that 
     receive supplemental nutrition assistance benefits to present 
   photographic verification at the time food is purchased with such 
                               benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``SNAP Verify Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. PHOTOGRAPHIC VERIFICATION FOR SNAP TRANSACTIONS.

    Section 11 of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2020) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(w) Photographic Verification for SNAP Transactions.--Not later 
than 3 years after the effective date of this subsection, the State 
agency shall require any member of a household, or any representative 
of the household, authorized to use an electronic benefit card to 
present photographic identification at the time such member or such 
representative presents the electronic benefit card to perform a 
transaction.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.

    (a) Effective Date.--This Act and the amendment made by this Act 
shall take effect on the 1st day of the 1st month that begins not less 
than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Application of Amendment.--The amendment made by this Act shall 
not apply with respect to certification periods that begin before the 
effective date of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maurice BAUM, a/k/a Dog Pound, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6973

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 21, 2017

Decided: December 27, 2017

Maurice Baum, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Seth Morgan Wood, Assistant United States Attorneys, Tobin Webb Lathan, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

*168Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Maurice Baum seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Baum has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL AND EXECUTIVE FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pan Asian Corporation (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Rozelle, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: October 14, 2008



|                                                                     |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Joseph Rozelle                                                   |  | 
|Joseph Rozelle
President
(Principal Executive and Financial Officer) |  | 





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 48 (Friday, March 11, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 14004]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05204]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL OP-OFA-007]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information 202-564-5632 or https://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly Receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)

Filed February 28, 2022 10 a.m. EST Through March 7, 2022 10 a.m. EST

    Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.
    Notice: Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make 
public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's 
comment letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/action/eis/search.
    EIS No. 20220029, Draft, FERC, PA, Regional Energy Access Expansion 
Project, Comment Period Ends: 04/25/2022, Contact: Office of External 
Affairs 866-208-3372.

    Dated: March 7, 2022.
Cindy S. Barger,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2022-05204 Filed 3-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

ROBERT FINK, 

Defendant Below, 

Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF DELAWARE, 

Appellee. 

§ 

§ 

§ No. 166, 2022 

§ 

§ Court Below—Superior Court 

§ of the State of Delaware 

§ 

§ Cr. ID No. 1710000460 (N) 

§ 

§ 

Submitted: August 9, 2022 

Decided: August 26, 2022 

ORDER

It appears to the Court that the appellant, Robert Fink, filed this appeal from 

his sentence for a violation of probation (“VOP”). Fink subsequently filed a motion 

to modify the VOP sentence to remove the Level V portions of the sentence so that 

he could complete inpatient substance treatment outside of prison, which the 

Superior Court granted on July 21, 2022. In denying Fink’s motion for preparation 

of the VOP hearing transcript at State expense, the Superior Court noted the mooting 

effect of the sentence modification on Fink’s VOP appeal. On July 25, 2022, the 

Senior Court Clerk issued a notice directing Fink to show cause why this appeal 

should not be dismissed as moot. Fink has not responded to the notice to show cause 

within the required ten-day period and therefore dismissal of this appeal is deemed 

to be unopposed. 
2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) 

and 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED. 

BY THE COURT: 

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

 Chief Justice