alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      13,045,208
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,927,654
<ALLOWANCES>                                   175,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,603,787
<PP&E>                                       4,261,024
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,464,993
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,239,474
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,579,426
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,520
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,653,528
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,239,474
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,675,635
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,407,695
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,416,432
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (527,696)<F1>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,620,796)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,620,796)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.25)
<FN>
<F1>INTEREST INCOME
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2
                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Sandra Rose, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Sea 2 Sky Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for the
registrant and I have:

     a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
          consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
          entities,  particularly  during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and  procedures  as of a date  within  ninety  (90) days  prior to the
          filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented in this report our conclusions  about the  effectiveness  of
          the disclosure  controls and procedures  based on our evaluation as of
          the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)    all  significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
           controls which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
           record,  process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
           identified for the registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
           internal controls; and

     b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
           employees who have a significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
           controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this report
whether or not there were significant  changes in internal  controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: November 27, 2007


By:       /s/ Sandra Rose
         -------------------------
         Sandra Rose
         Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Thomas J. Edelman, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Patina Oil & Gas Corporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: July 29, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 67 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 67

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That there shall be printed as a Senate document the report of the 
Commission on Protecting and Reducing Government Secrecy.
    Sec. 2. The document referred to in the first section shall be--
            (1) published under the supervision of the Secretary of the 
        Senate; and
            (2) in such style, form, manner, and binding as directed by 
        the Joint Committee on Printing, after consultation with the 
        Secretary of the Senate.
The document shall include illustrations.
    Sec. 3. In addition to the usual number of copies of the document, 
there shall be printed the lesser of--
            (1) 5,000 copies for the use of the Secretary of Senate; or
            (2) such number of copies as does not exceed a total 
        production and printing cost of $45,000.

            Passed the Senate September 17, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            S. CON. RES. 67

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To authorize printing of the report of the Commission on Protecting and 
                      Reducing Government Secrecy.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Global Growth Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Rozelle, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: October 12, 2010





/s/ Joseph RozelleJoseph Rozelle

President

(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)











The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
**Annual
      Statement of Compliance**


**COMM
      2006-C8 Mortgage Trust**





VIA:
      EMAIL





Deutsche
      Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation


60
      Wall
      Street


New
      York,
      New York 10005


Attention:
      Helaine M. Kaplan





Cadwalader,
      Wickersham & Taft LLP


One
      World
      Financial Center


New
      York,
      New York 10281


Attention:
      Anna H. Glick




Re:  The
      Pooling and Servicing agreement dated as of December 1, 2006 (the “Agreement”),
      among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, Midland
      Loan Services, Inc., as Master Servicer, LNR Partners, Inc., as Special
      Servicer, and LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee and Paying
      Agent.




I,
      Barbara L. Marik, a First Vice President of LaSalle Bank National Association,
      as Trustee and Paying Agent hereby certify that:





(1)
      A
      review of the activities of the Trustee and Paying Agent during the preceding
      calendar year and of the performance of the Trustee and Paying Agent under
      the
      Agreement has been made under my supervision; and





(2)
      To
      the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee and Paying Agent
      has
      fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
      throughout such year or a portion thereof.











Date: February
      1, 2007





LaSalle
      Bank National Association, as Trustee and Paying Agent








/s/
      Barbara L Marik


Barbara
      L. Marik


First
      Vice President
#### William L. MCVEIGH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLIMATE CHANGERS, INC., DBA JW Brower Heating & Air Conditioning; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-35331

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted November 15, 2017 *

Filed November 22, 2017

William L. McVeigh, Pro Se

Rod Stephens, Esquire, The Stephens Law Firm, Puyallup, WA, for Defendants-Appellees Climate Changers, Inc., Marlene Harnish

*695Christie Fix, Frank Freed Subit & Thomas, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Ap-pellee International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, and Transportation Workers, Local 66

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

William L. McVeigh appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action alleging employment-related claims. We review for an abuse of discretion a district court’s dismissal as a sanction under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b). *Malone v. United States Postal Serv.,*833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th Cir. 1987). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing McVeigh’s action because McVeigh failed to comply with the district court’s discovery orders, and he failed to appear for his deposition. *See id.*at 130-32 (discussing the five factors the district court must weigh before dismissing a case for failure to comply with a court order).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by sanctioning McVeigh in the amount of attorney’s fees and costs “caused by [McVeigh’s] failure to obey a court order to provide or permit discovery.” *Toth v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.,*862 F.2d 1381, 1385-86 (9th Cir. 1988) (setting forth standard of review and the expenses the district court may consider in awarding attorney’s fees under Rule 37(b)(2) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying McVeigh’s motion for reconsideration because McVeigh failed to establish any basis for such relief. *Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc.,*5 F.3d 1255, 1262-63 (9th Cir. 1993) (setting forth standard of review and grounds for reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)); *see also*W.D. Wash. R. 7(h)(1) (reconsideration will be “ordinarily den[ied] ... in the absence of a showing of manifest error in the prior ruling or a showing of new facts or legal authority which could not have been brought to [the district court’s] attention earlier with reasonable diligence.”).

We reject as without merit McVeigh’s contention that the district court was biased.

McVeigh’s motion to supplement the record on appeal (Docket Entry No. 20) is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 31.2
I, Dallas G. Smiley, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CitizensFirst Financial Corp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrantand have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 15, 2004
/s/Dallas G. SmileyChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of FFD Financial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert R. Gerber, the Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/  Robert R. GerberRobert R. GerberSenior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial OfficerMay 15, 2009
Cite as 2015 Ark. 5

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

No. CR-14-742

ISRAEL TODD WATSON

APPELLANT

V.

STATE OF ARKANSAS

APPELLEE

Opinion Delivered January 15, 2015

DETERMINATION OF ATTORNEY

FAULT

REFERRAL TO THE SUPREME

C O U R T C O M M I T T E E O N

P R O F E S S I O N A L C O N D U C T

ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

By per curiam dated October 2, 2014, we directed the clerk to accept Israel Todd

Watson’s belated appeal, but remanded this case to the circuit court for a determination of

attorney fault. Pursuant to this court’s order, the circuit court made findings of fact on the

issue of attorney fault in failing to timely file the record on appeal. We conclude that there

is attorney fault and direct that a copy of this per curiam be sent to the Supreme Court

Committee on Professional Conduct.

The circuit court’s findings are as follows. Israel Todd Watson, through his trial

counsel, Darrell Brown, Jr., filed a timely notice of appeal on October 2, 2013. By letter

dated October 16, 2013, the court reporter notified Brown that financial arrangements should

be made as soon as possible since this was not an indigence case, and the lengthy transcript

would need to be started in the very near future. On December 13, 2013, Brown filed a

motion to extend time to file the record. By order entered December 18, 2013, the time to
Cite as 2015 Ark. 5

file the record was extended until April 19, 2014.

On April 15, 2014, Brown filed a second motion to extend time for filing the record. 

The circuit court stated that it had “mistakenly” granted the extension, because, pursuant to

Rule 4(c)(2) of the Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure–Criminal, the limit of seven

months to file the transcript would have expired on April 19, 2014. Pursuant to Rule 4(c)(3)

of the Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure–Criminal, Brown should have filed his second

motion for extension of time with the appellate court. Brown also did not file the motion

to find Watson indigent simultaneously with the motion to extend time. Watson’s petition

was not filed until July 25, 2014. 

In McDonald v. State, 356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 883 (2004), we said that there are only

two possible reasons for an appeal not being timely perfected: either the party or attorney

filing the appeal is at fault, or there is good reason. Id. at 116, 146 S.W.3d at 891. When it

is plain from the motion, affidavits, and record that relief is proper under either rule based on

error or good reason, the relief will be granted, and if there is attorney error, a copy of the

opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. See id. Because the

failure to perfect this appeal lies with Watson’s trial counsel, a copy of the opinion will be

forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. See id.

It is so ordered.

2