alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2012107DE.01001201.xml

| 19.4.2012 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 107/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2012

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 107/12

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 2003/72/EG des Rates vom 22. Juli 2003 zur Ergänzung des Statuts der Europäischen Genossenschaft hinsichtlich der Beteiligung der Arbeitnehmer

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 207 vom 18. August 2003
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 207 vom 18. August 2003

Auf Seite 31, Teil III, Titel:

anstatt:

„REGELUNG IM FALL EINES SCE, DIE AUSSCHLIESSLICH VON NATÜRLICHEN PERSONEN ODER VON NUR EINER EINZIGEN JURISTISCHEN PERSON ZUSAMMEN MIT NATÜRLICHEN PERSONEN GEGRÜNDET WIRD“

muss es heißen:

„REGELUNG IM FALL EINER SCE, DIE AUSSCHLIESSLICH VON NATÜRLICHEN PERSONEN ODER VON NUR EINER EINZIGEN JURISTISCHEN PERSON ZUSAMMEN MIT NATÜRLICHEN PERSONEN GEGRÜNDET WIRD“;

auf Seite 35, Anhang, Teil 2, Buchstabe b Unterabsatz 3:

anstatt:

„Die Sitzung bezieht sich insbesondere auf die Struktur der SCE, seine wirtschaftliche und finanzielle Situation, die voraussichtliche Entwicklung der Geschäfts-, Produktions- und Absatzlage, auf die Beschäftigungslage und deren voraussichtliche Entwicklung, ...“

muss es heißen:

„Die Sitzung bezieht sich insbesondere auf die Struktur der SCE, ihre wirtschaftliche und finanzielle Situation, die voraussichtliche Entwicklung der Geschäfts-, Produktions- und Absatzlage, auf Initiativen im Hinblick auf die soziale Verantwortung der Unternehmen, auf die Beschäftigungslage und deren voraussichtliche Entwicklung, ...“.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 113 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 113

          To authorize representation by Senate Legal Counsel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                  May 3 (legislative day, May 1), 1995

    Mr. Dole (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
          To authorize representation by Senate Legal Counsel.

Whereas, in the case of Committee for Judicial Review v. The United States 
        Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Senator Orrin Hatch, No. 1:95CV0770, 
        pending in the United States District Court for the District of 
        Columbia, the plaintiff has filed a complaint, seeking, among other 
        relief, to restrain the Committee on the Judiciary from conducting 
        confirmation hearings on the nomination of Peter C. Economus, who has 
        been nominated to be a United States District Judge for the Northern 
        District of Ohio; and
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(1) (1994), the 
        Senate may direct its counsel to defend committees and Members of the 
        Senate in civil actions relating to their official responsibilities: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent 
the Committee on the Judiciary, its chairman, Senator Orrin G. Hatch, 
and the other members of the Committee on the Judiciary in the case of 
Committee for Judicial Review v. The United States Senate Committee on 
the Judiciary, Senator Orrin Hatch.
                                 <all>
```
# Department of Environmental Quality

To protect, conserve and enhance the quality of Wyoming's environment for the benefit of current and future generations. Dave Freudenthal, Governor John Corra, Director December7,2007

.., Mr. Robbie Roberts Regional Administrator USEPA Region 8 1595 Wynkoop Street Denver, CO 80202-1129
DearMr. Roberts:
OnMay 3, 2007, the State ofWyoming submitted a 110(a)(2)(D)(i) Transport State ImplementationPlan (SIP) to EPARegion 8. The purpose ofthis SIP was to address emissions that affect other states through interstate transport. Inpreparing this SIP, the State followed the August 15,2006 EPA guidance as well as the supplement issued on September 11, 2006. On October 2, 2007, William Harnett, Director ofthe Air QualityPolicyDivision for EPA, issued further instruction on a matterrelated to these 110 Transport SIPs, that States must certify that they have the basic SIP "infrastructure" elements inplace for the 1997 8-hour ozone and fine particulate matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Since EPA must make a determination on whether states have made complete submissions byDecember 15, 2007 with respect to the 8-hour ozone NAAQS, the State ofWyoming has made a determination that the existing SIP contains all ofthe necessary provisions to address requirements for the 8-hour ozone NAAQS and hereby certifies that the existing Wyoming SIP is adequate.
Ifyou have any questions concerning this letter, please feel free to contact Mr. David A. Finley at (307) 777-7391. Sincerely,

irector

# It~{**~' &~----**  V.Corra Wyoming Department ofEnvironmental Quality 

# RECEIVED

cc: David A. Finley, AQD Administrator 

## DEC 11 

## 2001 Christine Anderson, AQD 

# USEPARA'SOFFICE

Herschler Building • 122 West 25th Street • Cheyenne, WY 82002 • http://deq.state.wy.us ADMIN/OUTREACH ABANDONED MINES AIR QUALITY INDUSTRIAL SITING LAND QUALITY SOLID & HAZ. WASTE WATER QUALITY (307) 777-7937 (307) 777-6145 (307) 777-7391 (307) 777-7369 (307) 777-7756 (307) 777-7752 (307) 777-7781

FAX 777-3610 FAX 777-6462 FAX 777-5616 FAX 777-5973 FAX 777-5864 FAX 777-5973 FAX 777-5973
Exhibit 31.2

I,
Richard L. Walters, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Body Central Corp.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Dated:
March 31, 2011

/s/ RICHARD L. WALTERS Richard L. Walters Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer


---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 288 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 288

       Regarding the United States response to Iraqi aggression.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 5, 1996

 Mr. Daschle  (for Mr. Lott) (for himself, Mr. Daschle, Mr. Thurmond, 
     and Mr. Warner) submitted the following resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Regarding the United States response to Iraqi aggression.

Whereas the United States and its allies have vital interests in ensuring 
        regional stability in the Persian Gulf;
Whereas on August 31, 1996, Saddam Hussein, despite warnings from the United 
        States, began an unprovoked, unjustified, and brutal attack on the 
        civilian population in and around Irbil in northern Iraq, aligning 
        himself with one Kurdish faction to assault another, thereby causing the 
        deaths of hundreds of innocent civilians; and
Whereas the United States responded to Saddam Hussein's aggression on September 
        3, 1996, by destroying some of the Iraqi air defense installations and 
        announcing the expansion of the southern no-fly zone over Iraq: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate commends the military actions taken by 
and the performance of the United States Armed Forces, under the 
direction of the Commander-in-Chief, for carrying out this military 
mission in a highly professional, efficient and effective manner.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                        LORAL SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS LTD.

          COMPUTATION OF DEFICIENCY OF EARNINGS TO COVER FIXED CHARGES
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)
                                   (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                    SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                                                                         JUNE 30,
                                                                                               -------------------------
                                                                                                 2002            2001
                                                                                               ---------       ---------
<S>                                                                                            <C>             <C>
Income (loss) before income taxes, equity in net loss of affiliates, minority interest
  and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle ...............................      $   5,319       $ (71,382)
Plus fixed charges:
  Interest expense ......................................................................         52,833         107,559
  Interest component of rent expense (1) ................................................          7,612           8,575
Less: capitalized interest ..............................................................         15,878          11,115
                                                                                               ---------       ---------
Earnings available to cover fixed charges ...............................................      $  49,886       $  33,637
                                                                                               =========       =========
Fixed charges (2) .......................................................................      $(119,219)      $(172,951)
                                                                                               =========       =========
Deficiency of earnings to cover fixed charges ...........................................      $ (69,333)      $(139,314)
                                                                                               =========       =========
</TABLE>

----------
(1)   The interest component of rent expense is deemed to be approximately 25%
      of total rent expense.

(2)   Preferred dividends have not been adjusted for income taxes, due to the
      composition of the taxing jurisdictions underlying the Company's
      operations and the resulting impact on the Company's effective tax rate.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-22-0000004

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

RK-H, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

MK-H, Defendant-Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

(CASE NO. FC-D 08-1-2490)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

(By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Leonard and McCullen, JJ.)

Upon review of the record, it appears that:

(1) On December 30, 2021, self-represented DefendantAppellant MK-H conventionally filed a "Letter of Notice,"

construed as a notice of appeal in the underlying case, FC-D

No. 08-1-2490, without the fees required by Hawai#i Rules of

Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 3(a);

(2) On January 5, 2022, the clerk electronically filed

the notice of appeal to create the appeal in CAAP-22-0000004;

(3) On January 12, 2022, the appellate clerk entered a

notice of non-payment, instructing MK-H to pay the filing fee or

request a fee waiver on or before January 24, 2022, or the appeal

could be dismissed. The appellate clerk mailed the notice of

non-payment to MK-H's address on the notice of appeal, and no

return mail was received;

(4) The record on appeal was due on or before

March 7, 2022, see HRAP Rule 11(b)(1), but MK-H failed to pay the

filing fee or request a fee waiver from this court;

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-22-0000004

13-APR-2022

08:29 AM

Dkt. 9 ODSD
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

(5) On March 10, 2022, the appellate clerk entered a

default of the record on appeal, informing MK-H that the time to

docket the appeal had expired, MK-H had not paid the filing fee

or obtained an order allowing him to proceed on appeal in forma

pauperis, the matter would be brought to the court's attention on

March 21, 2022, for action that may include dismissal of the

appeal, and MK-H could seek relief from default by motion. The

appellate clerk mailed the default notice to MK-H's address on

the notice of appeal, but the United States Postal Service

returned the envelope, marked, "Return to Sender, Not Deliverable

as Addressed, Unable to Forward"; and

(6) MK-H has not filed a notice of change of address,

consistent with HRAP Rule 25(f), or taken any further action in

this appeal. An appeal may be dismissed where the record on

appeal has not been prepared because the appellant failed to pay 

the required fees or obtain an order allowing the appellant to

proceed in forma pauperis. HRAP Rule 11(b)(2), (c)(2).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is

dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 13, 2022.

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

Chief Judge

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard

Associate Judge

/s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen

Associate Judge

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001006282
<NAME> PICK COMMUNICATIONS CORP

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         164,198
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               231,392
<PP&E>                                       4,903,351
<DEPRECIATION>                                 310,642
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,189,468
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,555,372
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,235,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       105,229
<OTHER-SE>                                (29,849,750)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,189,468
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,305,732
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,411,521)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,411,521)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (449,559)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,861,080)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.39)


</TABLE>
Order entered January 4, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00118
- CR
ANTONIO LAMAR COCHRA N, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Cri minal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F15
- 76529
- H



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s December 31, 2018 second motion for extension of time
to file his brief or in the alternative, a motion to suspend the due date until the reporter’s record is complete. In the motion, appellant notes that not all the days of voir dire were included in the record and volumes 11 and 12 are identical in content. Our review of this appeal shows the thirty

- eight volume reporter’s record wa s filed on November 1, 2018 ; volumes 31

- 38 are sealed . Volumes 11 and 12 are substantially identical, containing the August 30, 2017 voir dire. On December 31, 2018, court reporter Crystal Jones filed a supplemental reporter’s record with voir dire from September 6, 2017, along with a letter stating that the supplemental record represents what should have been uploaded as volume 12 when the reporter’s record was filed November 1, 2018.It appears the reporter’s record is now complete. We GRANT appellant’ s motion to the

extent it requests an extension of time. Appellant’s brief is DUE January 31, 2019.
We STRIKE volume 12 of the reporter’s record filed November 1, 2018.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
#### IN RE: Brandon LEE, Petitioner.

No. 17-2344

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 18, 2018

Decided: January 22, 2018

Brandon Lee, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

*191Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Brandon Lee petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the Supreme Court of North Carolina to rule on his state mandamus petition. We conclude that Lee is not entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. *Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court,*426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 726 (1976); *United States v. Moussaoui,*333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. *In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n,*860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). This court does not have jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief against state officials. *Gurley v. Superior Court of Mecklenburg Cty.,*411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 1969).

The relief sought by Lee is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED*
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 11.1

                                 FORTE SOFTWARE, INC.
                            COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE
                        (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  Three Months Ended        Six Months Ended
                                                                    September 30,             September 30,
                                                                 1996         1997         1996          1997
<S>                                                             <C>          <C>           <C>          <C>
Actual weighted average shares outstanding for the period:      

Common Stock                                                    18,338        19,296       18,331        19,200
Common Stock Equivalents                                         2,740           -          2,776           -

Total common stock weighted average shares outstanding          21,078        19,296       21,107        19,200

Net income (loss)                                               $1,445       $(2,983)      $1,738       $(5,229)
                                                                ------       --------      ------       --------
Net income (loss) per share                                      $0.07        $(0.15)       $0.08        $(0.27)
                                                                ------       --------      ------       --------
                                                                ------       --------      ------       --------
</TABLE>
#### CEQUENT PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS, INC., Appellant v. HOPKINS MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, The Coast Distribution System Inc., Appellees

2016-2701

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

November 20, 2017

David Bogdan Cupar, McDonald Hopkins LLC, Cleveland, OH, argued for appellant. Also represented by Matthew John Cav-anagh.

Scott R. Brown, Hovey Williams LLP, Overland Park, KS, argued for appellees. Also represented by Matthew B. Walters.

(Newman, O’Malley, and Wallach, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Annual Report of Barclay Road, Inc., a Wyoming corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Eduardo Valero Erana, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Eduardo Valero EranaEduardo Valero Erana, Chief Executive Officer

July 6, 2011