alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive
Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
the undersigned officer of Party City Corporation (the
Company) hereby certifies, to such officers
knowledge, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/
    A of the Company for the quarterly period ended
    September 27, 2003 (the Report) fully complies
    with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
    Act of 1934, as amended; and
|
| | (ii) the information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                          



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ NANCY PEDOT        
| |                        
| | Nancy Pedot            
| | Chief Executive Officer

Dated: July 9, 2004

The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          14,773
<SECURITIES>                                       998
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,790
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     12,459
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,680
<PP&E>                                          13,028
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,921
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,283
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,025
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,762
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,283
<SALES>                                         15,515
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,515
<CGS>                                            8,524
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,946
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  72
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,134
<INCOME-TAX>                                       320
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,814
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,814
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.2



Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors
Atrium European Real Estate Limited:



We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-188107) on Form F-3 of Gazit-Globe Ltd of our report dated March 9, 2016,
with respect to the consolidated statements of financial position of Atrium European Real Estate Limited and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated income statements, statements of comprehensive income/(loss), cash
flow statements, and statements of changes in equity for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2015;
as well as our report dated March 10, 2015 with respect to the consolidated statements of financial position of Atrium European
Real Estate Limited and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, and the related consolidated income statements,
statements of comprehensive income/(loss), cash flow statements and statements of changes in equity for each of the years in the
two-year period ended December 31, 2014, which reports appear in the December 31, 2015 annual report on Form 20-F of Gazit-Globe
Ltd.



/s/ KPMG Channel Islands Limited

KPMG Channel Islands Limited

Jersey, Channel Islands
April 21, 2016
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth B. KUBINSKI, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-7171

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 21, 2017

Decided: December 28, 2017

Kenneth B. Kubinski, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth B. Kubinski appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion to remove a factual statement from the presentence report associated with his 1994 convictions. Rule 36 motions, however, apply only to clerical errors and are not the proper vehicle for challenging the substance of the information in a presentence report; such challenges must be filed within 14 days of receiving the report. *See*Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(f). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 175

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the recent elections in Hong

Kong.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 20 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 5), 1995

Mr. PRESSLER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Foreign Relations

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the recent

elections in Hong Kong.

Whereas the right to a fully elected legislature in Hong Kong

is guaranteed by the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration

on the Question of Hong Kong;

Whereas on September 17, 1995, the people of Hong Kong

demonstrated their commitment to democracy by freely

expressing their right to vote in the Legislative Council

elections; and

Whereas the voters of Hong Kong have overwhelmingly expressed their desire for the establishment of a fully democratic government: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that—
2

•SRES 175 IS

1 (1) the people of Hong Kong are to be con2 gratulated for exercising their right to vote on Sep3 tember 17, 1995;

4 (2) the People’s Republic of China should re5 spect the clear will of the people of Hong Kong to

6 have a fully democratic government; and

7 (3) the Chinese government should enter into a

8 dialogue with the democratically elected representa9 tives of the Hong Kong people.

Æ
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Fernando TREJO-CASAS, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-11696 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 20, 2017

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Fernando Trejo-Casas, Pro Se

Before JONES, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Fernando Trejo-Casas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Trejo-Casas has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no *274nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Citizens First Financial Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, C.
William Landefeld, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. /s/ C. William Landefeld  C. William Landefeld
Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2004
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-22-00480-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.P.S., A CHILD

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2020-FAM-3668-5

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. No costs are assessed, due to 

appellant’s inability to pay costs.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

March 2, 2023
#### Douglas Otto FISCHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. Cheryl HILL; Dr. Abdel Massoud, Chief Medical Officer, William R. Sharpe, Jr. Hospital; Kimberly Walsh, Former Interim Chief Executive Officer William R. Sharpe, Jr. Hospital, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-1641

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 31, 2017

Decided: December 14, 2017

*127Jason T. Gain, Bridgeport, West Virginia, for Appellant. Timothy R. Linkous, Stephanie J. Shepherd, LINKOUS LAW, PLLC, Morgantown, West Virginia; Amy M. Smith, Susan L. Deniker, Mark G. Jef-fries, STEPTOE & JOHNSON PLLC, Bridgeport, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Douglas Otto Fischer appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. The district court properly dismissed the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) claims on the ground that the defendants are entitled to absolute immunity from such claims, and properly declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the related state law claims. Accordingly, we affirm.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 13, 2012 | By:    |  /s/ Isaac Onn                                                           |   |
|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                  |   | Name: Isaac Onn                                                               |   |
|                  |   | Title: President, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer |   |
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 782 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 782

   To eliminate the sequestration under section 251A of the Balanced 
    Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2015

 Mr. Conyers (for himself, Mr. Lowenthal, Mr. Vargas, Ms. Schakowsky, 
Ms. Moore, Mr. McGovern, Ms. Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico, Ms. 
    Wilson of Florida, Mr. Ellison, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Pocan, and Mr. 
  Grijalva) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To eliminate the sequestration under section 251A of the Balanced 
    Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Cancel the Sequester Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF 251A SEQUESTRATION.

    Section 251A of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control 
Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 901a) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                 --------------


                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
            10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
            report on Form 10-K of CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2006-19 (the
            "Exchange Act periodic reports");

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
            whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
            omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
            in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
            not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
            information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
            covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
            reports;

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
            conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s) required
            in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
            disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer(s) have
            fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all
            material respects; and

      5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
            criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
            reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
            asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
            accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
            13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
            except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
            of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
            this report on Form 10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
      information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank
      of New York, as Trustee.

Date: March 26, 2007


      /s/ Steve Bailey
      ----------------
      Steve Bailey
      Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of China Domestica Bio-technology Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Qingyu Meng, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: November 17, 2011

/s/ Qingyu MengQingyu Meng, President(Principal Executive Officer)
Williams , Rene e (OST ) "POT ^ 06T-/117- ^

i[V^Z> - From : Joh n Steven s [stevens.john709@gnnail.conn ] Sent : Wednesday , Septembe r22 , 201 0 9:3 5 P M To : EA S (OST ) Subject : Massena , N YEssentia l Ai rServic e ;i 3 0 " i 'X 3 -iC/j - Mr . Devany , cv j c-^33 3 I woul dlik e t o sho w my support o f Cap e ai r for th e followin g reasons . " 0 >*^ ^ 1 . Cap e Ai r

i s offerin g mor e frequen t service , 2 1 pe r

wee k versu s 1 2 pe r

(_

o $ 5 week for Gulfstream . '^' ^ 2 . Gulfstreami s askin g for a n annua l subsid y nearl y on e millio ndollar s mor e than Cap e Ai r

(Gulfstream-$2,518,48 5 vs . Cap e Ai r $1,519,732. ) Tha t i s on e millio n dollar s that w e a s taxpayer s can t

affor dt o spend . 3 . Cap e Ai r

wil l fly t o Albany , an di s als o offerin g Boston . I agre e Bosto n ha s mor e connections , an dtraveler s wil l b e abl e t o continu e ont o Bosto n o n Cap e Air . 4 . Note dinth e Massen apaper , of th e 6 0 response s t o th e Busines s Developmen t

Corporation' s survey , th e majority chos e Alban y a s thei r preferre ddestination . 5 . Cap e Ai r

ha s provide dreliabl e an dcourteou s servic e t o it' s passenger s ove r th e las t tw o years . 6 . Gulfstreamonl y propose s asingle flight o n th e weekends . Thi s wil l mak e it difficult if no t impossibl e t o mak e connectin g flights . 7.Accordin g t o Gulfstream' s publi c financia l reports , the y ar e o nth e verg e o f bankruptcy . Thank You , Joh n Steven s Madrid , NY
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned executive officer of Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc., (the
Registrant) hereby certifies that the Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.



| | /s/ Jerry M. Chancellor
Name: Jerry M. Chancellor
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 11, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Francisco ROMERO, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-51470 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 6, 2017

*320Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, Jennifer Sheffield Freel, Ewell, Brown, Blanke *&*Knight, L.L.P., Austin, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Mary Stillinger, Esq., Law Office of Mary Stillinger, El Pasó, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before BENAVIDES, SOUTHWIOK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. •

PER CURIAM: *

Francisco Romero appeals his conviction for production of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). According to Romero, his conviction violates the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution because the alleged production of child pornography was purely intrastate and non-economic. In advancing this argument, Romero acknowledges that this court previously has rejected similar Commerce Clause arguments, *see United States v. Kallestad,*236 F.3d 225, 226-31 (5th Cir. 2000) and *United States v. Dickson,*632 F.3d 186, 192 (5th Cir. 2011), but he contends that this court’s prior rulings do not govern here, particularly in light of *Bond v. United States,*- U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 2077, 2086, 189 L.Ed.2d 1 (2014) and *Nat'l Fed’n of Indep. Bus. v. Sebelius,*567 U.S. 519, 550, 132 S.Ct. 2566, 183 L.Ed.2d 450 (2012) *(National Federation).*

We review the constitutional challenge de novo. *Kallestad,*236 F.3d at 227. We have held that the Commerce Clause authorizes Congress to prohibit local, intrastate production of child pornography where the materials used in the production were moved in interstate commerce. *Dickson,*632 F.3d at 192; *Kallestad,*236 F.3d at 226-31. The Supreme Court’s decision in *Bond*did not abrogate the holdings of these cases. *See United States v. McCall,*833 F.3d 560, 564-65 (5th Cir. 2016). Likewise, under the. rule of orderliness, “we are not at liberty to overrule our settled precedent because the Supreme Court’s decision in *National Federation*did not overrule it.” *United States v. Alcantar,*733 F.3d 143, 146 (5th Cir. 2013). Therefore, we are bound by *Kallestad*and *Dickson,*which render Romero’s arguments unavailing.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cm, R. 47.5.4.