alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 302 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Joseph L. Sullivan, certify that:
 
 1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofCE Casecnan Water and Energy Company; Inc.2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.

The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and5.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. 
 
 
 Date: August 3, 2004
 /s/ Joseph L. Sullivan
 Joseph L. Sullivan
 President
 (chief executive officer)
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

29 November 2006

(2006/C 291/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of FFD Financial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Trent B. Troyer, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


|                                      |  | 
|------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Trent B. Troyer                   |  | 
|Trent B. Troyer                       |  | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|November 15, 2010                     |  |
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KENNETH AARON SHINEDLING, Guardian Ad Litem for A.L.S, A.C.S and A.A.S.; et al.,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

v.

SUNBEAM PRODUCTS, INC., a Delaware Corporation,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 15

- 56891

D.C. No.

5:12

- cv

- 00438

- CJC

- SP

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California Cormac J. Carney, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 12, 2017 Pasadena, California

Before: KOZINSKI and OWENS, Circuit Judges, and WILKEN, ** Senior District Judge.

1. V iewing the evidence in the light most favorable to p laintiffs, substantial

evidence supports th e jury’s finding that Sunbeam Products, Inc.’s warni ngs were

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The Honorable Claudia Wilken, United States Senior District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. 

# FILED

JUN 30 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2

inadequate to alert plaintiffs of the fire risks associated with the space heater,

particularly the danger of using the heater while sleeping. See Jackson v. Deft

,

Inc.

, 273 Cal. Rptr. 214, 223 (Ct. App. 1990) (“In most cases . . . the adequacy o f a

warning is a question of fact for the jury.”); see also Harper v. City of Los Angeles

,

533 F.3d 1010, 1021 (9th Cir. 2008).

2. Regarding bystander damages, there is substantial evidence that the girls

were “present at the scene of the injury

- producing even t at the time it occur[ r ed]

and [were] then aware that it [was] causing injury to the victim.” Thing v. La

Chusa

, 771 P.2d 814, 815 (Cal. 1989). The jury was able to find that the girls

could have had “very little doubt” that their mother was “in the house that [ they]

saw engulfed in flames.” In re Air Crash Disaster Near Cerritos, California, On

Aug. 31, 1986 (Estrada) , 967 F.2d 1421, 1425 (9th Cir. 1992). As in Estrada

,

“ [ t ] he injury

- producing event was the fire, ” and the girls were not required to be

aware of its cause. Id .; see also Fortman v. Förvaltningsbolaget Insulan AB , 151

Cal. Rptr. 3d 320, 3 29 n.4 (Ct. App. 2013)

.

3. Finally, substantial evidence supports the amount of emotional distress

damages awarded to the girls, and the district court did not abuse its discretion by

denying Sunbeam’s motion for a new trial based on excessive damages.

See Gasperini v. Ctr. for Humanities, Inc. , 518 U.S. 415, 435

- 36 (1996); Toscano

v. Greene Music , 21 Cal. Rptr. 3d 7 32, 736 (Ct. App. 2004) ( Under California law,3

“[t]he amount of damages . . . is a fact question committed to the discretion of the

trial judge on a motion for new trial; an award of damages will not be disturbed if

it is suppo rted by substantial evidence. ” ).

AFFIRMED

.
#### YONGJIANG YIN and Shenzhen El Lighting Co. Ltd., Appellant v. SURE-FIRE ELECTRICAL CORPORATION, Cross-Appellant

2016-2686, 2016-2728

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

November 13, 2017

Aaron P, Bradford, Bradford, Ltd., Denver, CO, argued for appellant. Also represented by Andrea M. Lafrance; David B. Kellis, Sheridan Ross, PC.

Samuel Lewis Walling, Jones Day, Minneapolis, MN, argued for cross-appellant. Also represented by Ryan Michael Schultz, Robins Kaplan LLP.

(Lourie, O’Malley, and Hughes, Circuit Judges).

*982JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
  CERTIFICATION
    PURSUANT TO
    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
    SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    Form 10-Q
  2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
    statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
    necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
    circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
    financial information included in this report, fairly present in
    all material respects the financial condition, results of
    operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
    periods presented in this report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
    Rules 13a-15(e)
    and
    15d-15(e))
    and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
    Exchange Act
    Rules 13a-15(f)
    and
    15d-15(f))
    for the registrant and have:          5.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have
    disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
    control over financial reporting, to the registrants
    auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board
    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):      Richard
    J. Townsend
    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
_D_ev_a_n.y-..D_e_n_n_is...<Iooo0_S_T}.... bOr.. ~s.r·o

UJo-z, .. 141-13'3 , "r' , ," ;~; t/\\ ;L';",]

From:

Sent: To:- .. Subject:

Gentlemen,

Ipl132@aol.com

Thursday, February 04, 2010 1:28 PM

Devany, Dennis (OST); Swanson, Brian (OST)

EAS service for Plattsburgh NY

I just wanted to make you aware of the situation in Plattsburgh NY. I attended the legistaure meeting last night to

determan the EAS contract.

I was applaud as to how this process was handled. VERY unprofessional, the legislatures would not hear the interests of

the local population.

All they spoke about was the Canadian population wants larger aircraft. Correct me if im wrong, but the EAS program is

paid for by us citizens and not

Canadians.

They are not working for the interests of the local population, and will not get my votes.

Please take this into consideration, when making the ,decision, and not go with the Clinton Co. legislatures decision.

If you are interested in how the local population is commenting, please go to Pressrepublican.com click on the story

"county picks colgan air" and scroll down

to the comments section.

Thank you for taking the time to read this

P Wallace

Cadyville NY 12918

1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-06-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-02-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,894
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,379
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      8,941
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,018
<PP&E>                                          26,055
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,358
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 162,553
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,360
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           142
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,169
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   162,553
<SALES>                                          3,559
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,273
<CGS>                                            2,484
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,319
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (11)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,012
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,047)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        40
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,087)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,087)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.22)


</TABLE>
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of -- )

)

Southern Federal Pilot, Inc. )

)

 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Mr. Steven Parrish

 President

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jensen, Esq.

 Navy Chief Trial Attorney

Henry D. Karp, Esq.

 Trial Attorney

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: June 24, 2020

MARK A. MELNICK

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61119, Appeal of Southern Federal 

Pilot, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: June 25, 2020

ASBCA No. 61119

Under Contract No. N68836-17-D-0002

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
Date 04/02/15 Page 1 of 1 

INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT 

Summary Page 

Chemical ID: P-15-0306 Reviewer: SD/Wong 

Endpoints-Assessed Table 

Endpoints/Assessment 

Cycles1

Releases 

Assessed in 

NCEM2?

Reasons for not assessing releases

No XB 

Testing 

Required

No 

Hazard 

Concern

No 

Releases

Release 

Below 

Acute 

Threshold5

Release 

Below 

Chronic 

Threshold5

Other

Ingestion

Surface water

Ground water (landfill)

Consumer Use: DtD2

Inhalation

Air: incineration (stack)

Air: fugitive

Consumer Use: CEM3

Dermal

Consumer Use: CEM

Eco

Surface water: ADR 

conc and/or PDM4

Consumer Use: DtD

1Assessment cycles are endpoint concentrations and dose calculations within the NCEM2 model. 

2Down-the-Drain 

3Consumer Exposure Model 

4

Probabilistic Dilution Model 

5The threshold values for assessing endpoints are 1 mg/day for acute doses and 1 mg/year for chronic doses. 

EAB DROP: Release information for this compound does not meet criteria for preparation of an exposure 

assessment in the Exposure Assessment Branch’s (EAB) Initial Review Exposure Report (this report).
III

★(Star Print)

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 19

To express the sense of the Senate relating to committee funding.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. LOTT (for Mr. DOLE) (for himself, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr.

MACK, and Mr. NICKLES) submitted the following resolution; which was

indefinitely postponed

RESOLUTION

To express the sense of the Senate relating to committee

funding.

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the

2 Committee on Rules and Administration when it reports

3 the committee funding resolution for 1995–96 it should

4 reduce funding for committees by 15 percent from the

5 level provided for 1993–94.

Æ
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 09724

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

09724\09724_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 09724\09724_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09724\09724_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09724\09724_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

09724\Certification Statement_09724.pdf Plant certification statement

x 09724\Supporting Documentation\09724_Aerial Photo_1.doc Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09724\Supporting Documentation\09724_Aerial Photo_2.doc Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09724\Supporting Documentation\09724_Water Balance_1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09724\Supporting Documentation\09724_Water Balance_2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09724\09724_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09724\09724_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Sino Fibre Communications, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year end of December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Glenn Henricksen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|  

Dated this 28th day of June, 2007.

GLENN HENRICKSEN
Glenn HenricksenChief Financial Officer



















---
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 53 (Friday, March 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 15468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05732]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #17370 and #17371; TENNESSEE Disaster Number TN-
00135]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Tennessee

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Tennessee (FEMA-
4645-DR), dated 03/11/2022.
    Incident: Severe Winter Storm.
    Incident Period: 02/03/2022 through 02/04/2022.

DATES: Issued on 03/11/2022.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/10/2022.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/12/2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 03/11/2022, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Crockett, Fayette, Haywood, Lauderdale, Shelby, 
Tipton, Weakley.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      1.875
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      1.875
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      1.875
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17370 B 
and for economic injury is 17371 0.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Barbara Carson,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2022-05732 Filed 3-17-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
P. 1



# OAR Box 1818 Prepped byOllie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 6 ) ll-C- 3 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/6/20083:12:41 PM

Sheet 6 of 79% t

A 

# USE IMIT.I ) ST\T.. S K WIKONME.NTAI
. I'K M )TKCTR). \.Uil'.NC I W\<II1.\(;T(I\
. D.C
. 2046 0 V. " tPPO^ ' 

### NO V

## 25;- :

OH-IC F HI - \I R\SI ) KMH-\!'Il A Mr . Bria n O'Neill , Presiden t Insuranc e Institut e fo r Highwa ySafet y Watergat e 60 0 Washington , D.C . 2003 7 Dea r Mr . O'Neill , I woul d lik e t o than k yo u and you r staf f fo r meetin g wit h representative s o f th e Environmenta l Protectio nAgency' s (EPA ) Offic e o f Mobil e Source s an d th e Nationa l Highwa yTraffi c Safet y Administratio n(NHSTA ) o n Novembe r 5 , 1986 . I understan d tha t th e discussio no nth e subjec t o f th e safet yo f onboar d vehicl e system s fo r th e contro l o f refuelin g emission s wa s informativ e and candid . Th e meetin g provide d u s wit ha bette r understandin g o f th e - concern s th e Institut e ha s abou t th e additio no f ne wtechnolog y t o vehicl e fue l system s and th e increase d potentia l fo r post
cras hfires . O n th e othe r hand , w e hop e tha t byou r presentatio n w e wer e abl e t o conve yth e importanc e tha t safet yissue s hav e i n ou r deliberation s o ncontro l o f gasolin e vapor s fro mvehicl e refueling . A s mystaf f explained , w e believ e tha t th e onboar d vehicl e contro l system s whic hou r engineerin g analyse s hav e show nt o b e effectiv e and feasibl e ar e no t safet yhazards . Th e system s involv e ver yfe wadde d component s and ca nb e incorporate d t o a larg e extan t int o curren t evaporativ e contro l systems . A t th e meeting , yo u state d tha t yo u ar e no t awar e o f an ydat a o r othe r factua l evidenc e whic hindicat e tha t eithe r curren t evaporativ e contro l system s o r potentia l onboar d system s increas e th e ris k o f fir e ove r tha t whic hi s necessaril yinheren t i nanymoto r vehicl e whic hha s a tan k o f gasolin e an d fue l lines . A s yo u know , EP Aha s no t ye t reache d a decisio no nth e mos t effectiv e wa yt o contro l refuelin g emissions . I f w e wer e t o decid e i nfavo r o f th e onboar d approach , w e woul d initiat e forma l rulemakin g proceedings . Thi s woul d involve. a Notic e o f Propose d Rulemakin g announcin g on e o r mor e publi c hearing s an d requestin g writte n comment s o nth e proposal . Intereste d partie s woul d hav e a n opportunit yt o presen t thei r viewpoint s whic hwoul d the nb e considere d i n arrivin g a t a fina l decision .P. 3



### - 2 - Onc e again , than

k you for providing u s the opportunit yt o discus s thi s matte r wit hyou . W e appreciat e your concernan d welcome your continue d involvemen t i nthe rulemaking process . Sincerely , ••'•" • 57 J. Crai g Potte r „ > u 

### ' Assistan t Administrato r fo r Ai r an

d Radiatio n