alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 53 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 387
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 53

               Making corrections to Public Law 104-134.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 29, 1996

Mr. Hatfield (for himself and Mr. Byrd) introduced the following joint 
   resolution; which was read twice and ordered to be placed on the 
                                calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
               Making corrections to Public Law 104-134.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That:
    (a) In Public Law 104-134, insert after the enacting clause:

                  ``TITLE I--OMNIBUS APPROPRIATIONS''.

    (b) The two penultimate undesignated paragraphs under the 
subheading ``Administrative Provisions, Forest Service'' under the 
heading ``TITLE II--RELATED AGENCIES, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE'' of 
the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 
1996, as contained in section 101(c) of Public Law 104-134, are 
repealed.
    (c) Section 520 under the heading ``TITLE V--GENERAL PROVISIONS'' 
of the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban 
Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1996, as 
contained in section 101(e) of Public Law 104-134, is repealed.
    (d) Strike out section 337 under the heading ``TITLE III--GENERAL 
PROVISIONS'' of the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies 
Appropriations Act, 1996, as contained in section 101(c) of Public Law 
104-134, and insert in lieu thereof:
    ``Sec. 337. The Secretary of the Interior shall promptly convey to 
the Daughters of the American Colonists, without reimbursement, all 
right, title and interest in the plaque that in 1933 was placed on the 
Great Southern Hotel in Saint Louis, Missouri by the Daughters of the 
American Colonists to mark the site of Fort San Carlos.''
    (e) Section 21104 of Public Law 104-134 is repealed.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 387

104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 53

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

               Making corrections to Public Law 104-134.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 29, 1996

          Read twice and ordered to be placed on the calendar
```
**ANNUAL
      STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE**


**OFFICER'S
      CERTIFICATE**


**(EZ
      Storage Portfolio Whole Loan)**





Re:
            Deutsche
                Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation COMM 2006-C8 (the "Trust"),
                created pursuant to that certain pooling and servicing agreement,
                dated as
                of December 1,2006
                (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement"), among Deutsche Bank Mortgage
                & Asset Receiving Corporation, as depositor, Midland Loan Services,
                Inc., as master servicer, LNR Partners, Inc., as special servicer,
                and
                LaSalle Bank National Association, as trustee and paying
                agent.





In
      connection with the above-referenced transaction the undersigned officer, on
      behalf of Bank of America, N.A. as master servicer (the "Lead Servicer"), with
      respect to the EZ Storage Portfolio Whole Loan, (as defined in the Pooling
      and
      Servicing Agreement) a part of which is included in the Trust, under that
      certain pooling and servicing agreement (the "Lead Servicing Agreement") dated
      as of November 1, 2006, among Banc of America Commercial Mortgage Trust, as
      depositor, the Lead Servicer, CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as special
      servicer, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee and REMIC administrator, hereby
      certifies that (i) with respect to the EZ Storage Portfolio Whole Loan, a review
      of the activities for the period ending December 31, 2006 and of the Lead
      Servicer's performance under the Lead Servicing Agreement, have been made under
      my supervision; (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the
      Lead
      Servicer, with respect to the EZ Storage Portfolio Whole Loan, has fulfilled
      all
      of its obligations under the agreements in all material respects throughout
      the
      aforementioned period; and (iii) the Lead Servicer, with respect to the EZ
      Storage Portfolio Whole Loan, has received no notice regarding qualification,
      or
      challenging the status, of any portion of the Trust fund as a REMIC from the
      Internal Revenue Service or any other governmental agency or body.








Bank
      of
      America, National Association


/s/
      Sean D. Reilly


Sean
      D.
      Reilly


Principal






/s/
      H.
      Michael Lumadue


H.
      Michael Lumadue


Vice
      President
<Page>


                                                                  Exhibit (99)1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
---------------------------------------------

I, Patricia F. Russo, Chief Executive Officer of Lucent Technologies Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
         period ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated: August 13, 2002


/s/ Patricia F. Russo
---------------------
Patricia F. Russo
Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 60 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 60

     To disapprove the rule submitted by the Health Care Financing 
 Administration on August 30, 1996, relating to hospital reimbursement 
                      under the Medicare program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 17, 1996

  Mr. Lott introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
      twice, considered, read the third time and failed of passage

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
     To disapprove the rule submitted by the Health Care Financing 
 Administration on August 30, 1996, relating to hospital reimbursement 
                      under the Medicare program.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Health Care Financing Administration on August 
30, 1996 (volume 61, number 170, page 46215 of the Federal Register), 
relating to hospital reimbursement under the Medicare program, and such 
rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 217 (Friday, November 8, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 67024]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-26717]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Parts 71

[Docket FAA No. FAA-2013-0529; Airspace Docket No. 13-ANM-17]

Establishment of Class E Airspace; Glasgow, MT

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action corrects a final rule published in the Federal 
Register of September 30, 2013, that establishes Class E airspace at 
the Glasgow VHF Omni-Directional Radio Range/Distance Measuring 
Equipment (VOR/DME) navigation aid, Glasgow, MT. A favorable comment 
from the National Business Aviation Association (NBAA) was received in 
the public Docket but was not referenced in the Final Rule.

DATES: Effective date: 0901 UTC, December 12, 2013. The Director of the 
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under 
1 CFR Part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and 
publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eldon Taylor, Federal Aviation 
Administration, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center, 1601 
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057; telephone (425) 203-4537.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History

    The FAA published a final rule in the Federal Register establishing 
Class E airspace at the Glasgow VOR/DME navigation aid, Glasgow, MT (78 
FR 59807, September 30, 2013). The FAA received a comment in support of 
the rule from the NBAA for inclusion in FAA Docket No. FAA-2013-0529 
prior to the closing of the comment period. However, the preamble 
incorrectly references that there were no comments to the proposal. 
This action corrects that statement.

Correction to Final Rule

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the 
description under the History heading, as published in the Federal 
Register of September 30, 2013 (78 FR 59807), Airspace Docket No. 13-
ANM-17, FR Doc. 2013-23669, is corrected as follows: On page 59808, 
column 1, line 4, remove the words ``No comments were received.'', and 
add in their place ``One comment was received from the National 
Business Aviation Association fully supporting the establishment of 
Class E en route airspace.''.

    Issued in Seattle, Washington, on October 30, 2013.
Clark Desing,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2013-26717 Filed 11-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 121

In support of the Angola peace process.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 17 (legislative day, MAY 15), 1995

Mr. FEINGOLD (for himself, Mrs. KASSEBAUM, Mr. HELMS, Mr. PELL, and

Mr. SIMON) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

In support of the Angola peace process.

Whereas Angola has suffered one of the most violent and

longest-running civil wars;

Whereas the United States was actively engaged in the war

in Angola, has provided more than $200 million in humanitarian assistance to Angola since 1992, and has

been a key facilitator on the ongoing peace negotiations;

Whereas Angola is the last civil conflict in southern Africa,

and regional leaders including South African President

Nelson Mandela consider its resolution to be a top priority;

Whereas an enduring peace in Angola, a potentially wealthy

country that is central to regional stability and economic
2

SRES 121 ATS

development, is in the national interest of the United

States;

Whereas the Government of Angola and National Union for

the Total Independence of Angola (UNITA) entered into

the Lusaka Protocol in November 1994 to secure a U.N.-

supervised peace settlement;

Whereas the United Nations Security Council voted in February to send a U.N. peacekeeping mission to Angola to

monitor and enforce the peace process, and more than

600 international monitors are deployed throughout the

country;

Whereas continuing progress toward peace makes it more

likely that further deployment of UNAVEM III will occur

soon;

Whereas the meeting between President Eduardo dos Santos

and Dr. Jonas Savimbi on May 6, 1995, at which both

parties reiterated their commitment to the Lusaka Protocol, demonstrated that they possess the essential political

will to resolve outstanding issues, and encouraged all who

want peace in Angola;

Whereas achieving a lasting peace will require that all Angolans work together to overcome bitter legacies of war,

which include a devastated infrastructure, millions of

unexploded landmines, a profound distrust between the

parties, weakened civil institutions, a crippled economy,

and a generation of young Angolans who have never

known a peaceful, civil society; and

Whereas strong leadership is essential to ensure that the

wealth of Angola, long spent on war, now is used to consolidate peace: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—
3

SRES 121 ATS

1 (1) congratulates the people of Angola for the

2 courageous and determined steps their leaders have

3 taken in support of peace;

4 (2) urges all parties in Angola to continue to

5 strengthen their commitment to the Lusaka process,

6 which constitutes the last, and best, change for se7 curing an enduring peace;

8 (3) affirms that the United States will hold

9 both Angolan parties responsible for abiding by their

10 commitment to peace; and

11 (4) calls upon the international community to

12 remain actively engaged in support of national rec13 onciliation, removal of landmines, economic develop14 ment, and democratization in Angola.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CleanTech Innovations, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Bei Lu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m or §78o(d)); and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: September 29, 2011
By:
/s/ Bei LuBei Lu

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)





This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00085

- CR

Jerry Paul Lundgren

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From County Court at Law

o f Wise County (CR

- 66896 )

August 21, 2014

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT ON REMAND

This appeal is on remand from the Court of Criminal Appeals.

This court has again considered the record on appeal in this case an d

holds that the trial court erred . It is ordered that the trial court’s order denying

Appellant’s motion to quash is reversed and the the motion to revoke Appellant’s

community supervision is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

___________________ Justice Lee Gabriel
Amendment to Employment Agreement





EXHIBIT 10.2

ADDENDUM #2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF JULY 3, 2000

This Addendum #2 to the July, 3, 2000, Employment Agreement (“Agreement”) between Kevin G. Kroger “Kroger”) and Puradyn Filter Technologies Incorporated (“PFTI”), is made and entered into effective November 16, 2017 (“Effective Date”).

Recitals


A.

Kevin Kroger and Puradyn Filter Technologies Incorporated entered into an employment agreement on July 3, 2000. As part of the compensation promised to Kroger in that agreement, Kroger is entitled to a $600,000 Life Insurance Policy as evidenced by Section #2(c)(ii), Compensation, Executive Perquisites, Benefits, and Other Compensation.  


B.

Kroger, in his desire to show his confidence and belief in the future performance of PFTI, and to conserve PFTI cash resources at this time, agrees to amend Section #2 (c)(ii), Compensation, Executive Perquisites, Benefits, and Other Compensation, of his employment contract.

AGREEMENT:


1.

In lieu of and in exchange for the $600,000 Life Insurance Policy, Kroger will accept a $300,000 Life Insurance Policy.


2.

All other terms and conditions of the July 3, 2000 Employment Agreement remain in full force and effect.




			
	EMPLOYEE:

	 
	EMPLOYER:


	Kevin G. Kroger

	 
	Puradyn Filter Technologies, Inc.


	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	/s/Kevin G. Kroger

	 
	/s/Joseph V. Vittoria


	Kevin G. Kroger

	 
	Joseph V. Vittoria


	President and Chief Operating Officer

	 
	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 284

To authorize the production of records by the Permanent Subcommittee

on Investigations.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 26, 1996

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize the production of records by the Permanent

Subcommittee on Investigations.

Whereas the court-appointed monitor of the Hotel Employees

and Restaurant Employees International Union

(HEREIU) has requested that the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations provide him with copies of

subcommittee records relevant to the monitor’s oversight

of a consent decree enjoining members of the HEREIU

from violating the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) or knowingly associating with organized crime figures;

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States

and rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be taken
2

SRES 284 ATS

from such control or possession but by permission of the

Senate; and

Whereas, when it appears that documents, papers, and

records under the control or in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate

will take such action as will promote the ends of justice

consistently with the privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the chairman and vice chairman of the

2 Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, acting joint3 ly, are authorized to provide to the court-appointed mon4 itor of HEREIU copies of memoranda and transcripts of

5 interviews conducted by subcommittee staff that the mon6 itor has requested for use in connection with the monitor’s

7 oversight of the consent decree.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Seven Seas Acquisition Corporation (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, the undersigned officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  November 24, 2009

/s/    Joseph R. Rozelle



JOSEPH R. ROZELLE

Principal Executive Officer

and Principal Financial Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
#### David ZAITZEFF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SEATTLE, a municipality; Daniel Satterberg, King County Prosecutor, those in privity with him, in re RCW 9.41.250 and Sea v Evans, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-35955

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted November 15, 2017 *

Filed November 21, 2017

David Zaitzeff, Pro Se

Scott P. Kennedy, Gary Theodore Smith, Assistant City Attorney, Seattle City Attorney’s Office, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellee City of Seattle

David James Eldred, Esquire, Senior Litigating Attorney, John R. Zeldenrust, King County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

David Zaitzeff appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing for lack of standing his action alleging that Revised Washington Code section 9.41.250 and Seattle Municipal Code sections *59512A.14.080 and .083 violate his First and Second Amendment rights. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Wilson v. Kayo Oil Co.,*563 F.3d 979, 980 (9th Cir. 2009). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Zaitzeff s action because Zaitzeff failed to allege facts sufficient to establish constitutional standing.to bring a pre-enforcement challenge to a statute. *See Thomas v. Anchorage Equal Rights Comm’n,*220 F.3d 1134, 1139 (9th Cir. 2000) (setting forth factors to consider in evaluating genuineness of a claimed threat of prosecution); *San Diego Cty. Gun Rights Comm’n v. Reno,*98 F.3d 1121, 1126 (9th Cir. 1996) (plaintiff must show a *“genuine*threat of *imminent*prosecution” (citation and quotation marks omitted)); see *also Libertarian Party v. Bowen,*709 F.3d 867, 870 (9th Cir. 2013) (in First Amendment context, courts consider “whether the prosecuting authorities have communicated a specific warning or threat to initiate proceedings, and the history of past prosecution or enforcement under the challenged statute”).

AFFIRMED.

***

 ThiS disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.