alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
May 27, 2015

Mr. Matthew Gorajek 8 Spruce Court Highstown, NJ 08520

Dear Mr. Gorajek:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your April 16, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-1054), but we are unable to pr ocess your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited balance sheet of Lucent at December 31, 1998 and the unaudited
consolidated statement of income for the three month period ended December 31,
1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
The financial data schedule reflects the two-for-one split of Lucent's common
stock which became effective on April 1, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                       OCT-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      940
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                             9,531
<ALLOWANCES>                                346
<INVENTORY>                               3,778
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         17,351
<PP&E>                                   12,531
<DEPRECIATION>                            6,886
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           31,641
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    12,441
<BONDS>                                   2,404
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                     13
<OTHER-SE>                                8,424
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             31,641
<SALES>                                   9,204
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          9,204
<CGS>                                     4,386
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             4,386
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            947
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            (15)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           78
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           2,121
<INCOME-TAX>                                721
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       1,400
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                 1,308
<NET-INCOME>                              2,708
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              2.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                              2.00
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 32 Referred in House (RFH)]

  1st Session
S. J. RES. 32

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 1995

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the concern of the Congress regarding certain recent remarks 
 that unfairly and inaccurately maligned the integrity of the Nation's 
                       law enforcement officers.

Whereas police today are in more danger and face greater risks than ever before, 
        with thousands being assaulted and hundreds being killed or injured each 
        year;
Whereas attacks on the Nation's law enforcement officers directly endanger the 
        safety and well-being of all American citizens by incapacitating and 
        wounding those who protect all of us;
Whereas America's law enforcement officers are increasingly being confronted not 
        only with physical attacks, but with malicious, mean-spirited, and 
        misleading character assassinations that unnecessarily malign the 
        overwhelming majority of honest and ethical law enforcement officers 
        while at the same time undermining public confidence in our country's 
        duly established system of criminal justice; and
Whereas persons who hold positions of special social responsibility, such as 
        attorneys, officers of the courts, and instructors of our youth, by 
        virtue of their position bear a heightened responsibility not to mislead 
        the public, and especially not to mislead the public at the expense of 
        those upon whom we all rely for protection: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SENSE OF CONGRESS CONCERNING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS.

    It is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) this Nation owes a debt of the greatest magnitude to 
        the men and women who daily serve the people of America as law 
        enforcement officers;
            (2) the integrity, honesty, dedication, and sacrifice of 
        this Nation's law enforcement officers constitute the very 
        bedrock of the rule of law, which distinguishes a free society 
        from a state of tyranny; and
            (3) America's police deserve the thanks and support of the 
        people of the United States, which are hereby tendered by their 
        elected Senators and Representatives.

            Passed the Senate April 7 (legislative day, April 5), 1995.

            Attest:

                                               SHEILA P. BURKE,

                                                             Secretary.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 31 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 31

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   grant Congress and the States the power to prohibit the physical 
             desecration of the flag of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 21 (legislative day, March 16), 1995

    Mr. Hatch (for himself, Mr. Heflin, Mr. Dole, Mr. Thurmond, Mr. 
  Grassley, Mr. Simpson, Mr. Kyl, Mr. Exon, Mr. Craig, Mr. Ford, Mr. 
Lott, Mr. Ashcroft, Mr. Baucus, Mr. Bond, Mr. Breaux, Mr. Campbell, Mr. 
    Coats, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Coverdell, Mr. D'Amato, Mr. 
Faircloth, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Gramm, Mr. Grams, Mr. Gregg, Mr. Helms, 
     Mr. Hollings, Mrs. Hutchison, Mr. Inhofe, Mrs. Kassebaum, Mr. 
    Kempthorne, Mr. Lugar, Mr. Mack, Mr. McCain, Mr. Murkowski, Mr. 
  Pressler, Mr. Rockefeller, Mr. Roth, Mr. Santorum, Mr. Shelby, Mr. 
   Smith, Ms. Snowe, Mr. Stevens, Mr. Thomas, Mr. Thompson, and Mr. 
Warner) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice 
             and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   grant Congress and the States the power to prohibit the physical 
             desecration of the flag of the United States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years from the date of its submission by the Congress:

                              ``Article--

    ``The Congress and the States shall have power to prohibit the 
physical desecration of the flag of the United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal C 150A/5 Ju

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 150A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 475 June 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 150A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 475 June 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Corrigenda |
| | |
| 2004/C 150A/1 | Corrigendum to the notice of open competition EPSO/A/20/04 and EPSO/A/21/04 — Heads of Unit (A5/A4-A*9) and Heads of Unit (A3-A*12) of Cypriot, Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Maltese, Polish, Slovene and Slovakian citizenships in the following fields: law, macro/microeconomics, statistics; audit/financial management; European public administration | 1 |
| 2004/C 150A/2 | Corrigendum to the notice of open competition EPSO/A/22/04 and EPSO/A/23/04 — Heads of Unit (A5/A4-A*9) and Heads of Unit (A3-A*12) of Cypriot, Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Maltese, Polish, Slovene and Slovakian citizenships in the following fields: information, press and public relations | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

Corrigenda

2004/C 150A/1

Corrigendum to the notice of open competition EPSO/A/20/04 and EPSO/A/21/04 — Heads of Unit (A5/A4-A*9) and Heads of Unit (A3-A*12) of Cypriot, Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Maltese, Polish, Slovene and Slovakian citizenships in the following fields: law, macro/microeconomics, statistics; audit/financial management; European public administration

1

2004/C 150A/2

Corrigendum to the notice of open competition EPSO/A/22/04 and EPSO/A/23/04 — Heads of Unit (A5/A4-A*9) and Heads of Unit (A3-A*12) of Cypriot, Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Maltese, Polish, Slovene and Slovakian citizenships in the following fields: information, press and public relations

2

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                       LORAL SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS LTD.

          COMPUTATION OF DEFICIENCY OF EARNINGS TO COVER FIXED CHARGES
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)
                                  (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                  SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                              ---------------------
                                                                2000        1999
                                                              ---------   ---------
<S>                                                           <C>         <C>
Income (loss) before income taxes, equity in net loss of
  affiliates and minority interest..........................  $  10,124   $ (15,651)
Plus fixed charges:
  Interest expense..........................................    137,075     126,661
  Interest component of rent expense(1).....................     11,010       6,567
Less: capitalized interest..................................     11,489      59,477
                                                              ---------   ---------
Earnings available to cover fixed charges...................  $ 146,720   $  58,100
                                                              =========   =========
Fixed charges(2)............................................  $(220,565)  $(180,687)
                                                              =========   =========
Deficiency of earnings to cover fixed charges...............  $ (73,845)  $(122,587)
                                                              =========   =========
</TABLE>

---------------

(1) The interest component of rent expense is deemed to be approximately 25% of
    total rent expense.

(2) Fixed charges include preferred dividends as adjusted for the Company's
    effective tax rate, excluding one-time events.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 44 (Monday, March 7, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 12743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04830]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of 
the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the 
Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on 
Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 10 a.m.

PLACE: The meeting will be webcast on the Commission's website at 
www.sec.gov.

STATUS: The meeting will begin at 10 a.m. (ET) and will be open to the 
public via webcast on the Commission's website at www.sec.gov.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. The Commission will consider whether to 
propose amendments regarding cybersecurity risk management, strategy, 
governance, and incident disclosure.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary 
at (202) 551-5400.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: March 9, 2022.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-04830 Filed 3-3-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Exhibit 12
                                                               Form 10-Q
                                                               For the Six
                                                               Months Ended
                                                               March 31, 1998



                            Lucent Technologies Inc.
                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

                              (Dollars in Millions)
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              For the Six
                                                              Months Ended
                                                             March 31, 1998

<S>                                                              <C>    
Earnings Before Income Taxes...........................          $ 1,602

Less Interest Capitalized during
  the Period...........................................                9
Less Undistributed Earnings of Less than 50%
   Owned Affiliates.....................................                8

 Add Fixed Charges......................................              233

 Total Earnings ........................................          $ 1,818



 Fixed Charges

 Total Interest Expense Including Capitalized Interest..            $ 168

 Interest Portion of Rental Expense.....................               65

     Total Fixed Charges................................            $ 233

 Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.....................              7.8
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 715 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 715

  To amend title 5, United States Code, to give members of the United 
 States Capitol Police the option to delay mandatory retirement until 
                                age 60.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2015

 Mr. Capuano introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 5, United States Code, to give members of the United 
 States Capitol Police the option to delay mandatory retirement until 
                                age 60.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OPTIONAL DELAY IN MANDATORY RETIREMENT AGE FOR MEMBERS OF 
              CAPITOL POLICE.

    (a) Civil Service Retirement System.--The second sentence of 
section 8335(c) of title 5, United States Code, is amended to read as 
follows: ``At the request of such a member, the Capitol Police Board 
shall exempt the member from automatic separation under this subsection 
until that member becomes 60 years of age, so long as the member 
undergoes a physical examination during the 6-month period which ends 
on the day the member turns 57 years of age and, on the basis of the 
examination, meets appropriate physical fitness criteria (as determined 
by the Board in consultation with the Chief of the Capitol Police and 
the exclusive representative of the Capitol Police under chapter 71 of 
title 5, United States Code, with respect to collective bargaining).''.
    (b) Federal Employees Retirement System.--The second sentence of 
section 8425(c) of title 5, United States Code, is amended to read as 
follows: ``At the request of such a member, the Capitol Police Board 
shall exempt the member from automatic separation under this subsection 
until that member becomes 60 years of age, so long as the member 
undergoes a physical examination during the 6-month period which ends 
on the day the member turns 57 years of age and, on the basis of the 
examination, meets appropriate physical fitness criteria (as determined 
by the Board in consultation with the Chief of the Capitol Police and 
the exclusive representative of the Capitol Police under chapter 71 of 
title 5, United States Code, with respect to collective bargaining).''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 35
                                  ----------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                    CHL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH TRUST 2006-20
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-20


     The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to Section
3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series
(the "Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                            Dated: March 14, 2007
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
#### Roscoe ARTIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Earl H. STRICKLAND; North Carolina State Bar, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-7144

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 18, 2018

Decided: January 22, 2018

Roscoe Artis, Appellant Pro Se.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Roscoe Artis appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Artis v. Strickland,*No. 5:17-ct-03065-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 11, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 276

Congratulating the people of Mongolia on embracing democracy in Mongolia

through their participation in the parliamentary elections held on June

30, 1996.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 8, 1996

Mr. ROBB submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Foreign Relations

RESOLUTION

Congratulating the people of Mongolia on embracing democracy in Mongolia through their participation in the parliamentary elections held on June 30, 1996.

Whereas Mongolia conducted elections on June 30, 1996, for

its unicameral national parliament, the Great Hural;

Whereas Mongolian voters cast their ballots in a peaceful and

orderly fashion at 1590 polling places, choosing from

among 351 candidates representing 11 different parties

and coalitions;

Whereas the primary issues facing Mongolian voters were the

scope and pace of continued democratization and economic liberalization;

Whereas the former Communist Mongolian People’s Revolutionary Party (MPRP) suffered a dramatic and unex-
2

•SRES 276 IS

pected loss at the polls, and the Democratic Union Coalition won majority control of the Great Hural;

Whereas the Democratic Union Coalition espoused a policy of

strengthening democratic institutions, implementing free

market economic reforms, and strengthening the independence of the judiciary;

Whereas voter turnout exceeded 87 percent according to preliminary reports;

Whereas an international election observation team led by

former Secretary of State James A. Baker traveled to

nine different areas of Mongolia to observe pre-election

day preparations and Mongolian citizens voting on election day; and

Whereas the United States election observers judged the election to be free, peaceful, and fair, with the results respected by all sides: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate hereby congratulates the

2 people of Mongolia for—

3 (1) overwhelmingly embracing democracy

4 through their participation in the June 30, 1996,

5 elections for the national parliament, the Great

6 Hural;

7 (2) conducting free, fair, and credible elections;

8 (3) continuing to build on the progress of the

9 past and moving further away from their previous

10 dependence on a communist system; and
3

•SRES 276 IS

1 (4) serving as an example to the peoples of

2 East Asia who seek further democratization of their

3 countries.

4 SEC. 2. The Secretary of the Senate shall transmit

5 a copy of this resolution to the President with the request

6 that he further transmit such copy to the Government of

7 Mongolia.

Æ