alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
                  UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:
1. I have  reviewed  this  report  on Form  10-K and all  reports  on Form  10-D
   required to be filed in respect of the period  covered by this report on Form
   10-K of RALI Series 2006-QA11 Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");
2. Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic reports,  taken as a whole,
   do not contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
   material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
   circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not  misleading  with
   respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  all  of  the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
   information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
   this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicers and
   based on my knowledge and the compliance  reviews  conducted in preparing the
   servicer  compliance  statements  required in this report  under Item 1123 of
   Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,
   the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
   in all material respects; and
5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance  with  servicing  criteria for
   asset-backed  securities and their related  attestation reports on assessment
   of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
   be included in this report in accordance  with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
   Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
   report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
   of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
   on Form 10-K.

In giving the  certifications  above,  I have  reasonably  relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: National City Mortgage Co.
and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.

Date:  March 26, 2007

By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ---------------------
Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
Title:    Managing Director
# DRAFT

**Subject:** Meeting with Turbosonic Regarding Catal yt ic Gas Treatment **Location:** U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , Research Triangle Park, NC **Date:** March 14, 2012 **Participants:** Turbosonic Ed Spink Rodney L . Pennington U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Keith Barnett Sharon Nizich Peter Westlin Nick Hutson RTIInternational Matt Hakos Mike Laney Portland Cement Association (PCA) Andy O’Hare, PCA John Holmes Nancy Garnett, TXI (by

telephone) Curtis L esslie, Ash Grove Tim Matts, L ehigh Jason Morin, Holcim? Dan Nugent, Buzzi Unicem Mike Pelan, Lafarge Satish Sheth, Cemex Hector Ybanez, Holcim

This meeting was a presentation by Turbosonic on their Cataly tic Gas Treatment (CGT) control technology . CGT is a newer technology developed by

Turb osonic that reduces VOC emissions. Turbosonic provided a detailed presentation about the technology , its current use in other industries, and its potential application to the cement industry

.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-31192 Summary Calendar

MANUEL ORTIZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 97-CV-140-A-M3

-------------------- September 10, 1999 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Manuel Ortiz, Louisiana state prisoner # 349580, appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the defendants in his Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) suit. 5 U.S.C. § 552. Ortiz argues that certain information should not have been withheld from him, maintaining that any individual privacy interests in keeping the withheld information confidential were outweighed by the public interest in its release, and that the FBI failed to provide him with all non-No. 98-31192 -2- exempt materials covered by his FOIA request. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Ortiz has failed to advance any particular public interests that may be served by disclosure of the withheld information. See Burge v. Eastburn , 934 F.2d 577, 579 (5th Cir. 1991). Further, his contention that the FBI failed to provide him with over 700 additional pages of documents relates to a separate FOIA request that is not the subject of this litigation. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. AFFIRMED.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rashaun SCOTT, a/k/a Shaun, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-4451

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 30, 2018

Decided: February 1, 2018

' Leslie T. Sarji, SARJI LAW FIRM, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. -John C. Potterfield, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rashaun Scott appeals from the revocation of his supervised release and the resulting 24-month sentence. Scott’s counsel has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), asserting that there are no meritorious issues, but noting that Scott objected below to the classification of *140four of his supervised release violations, all for possession and use' of marijuana, as Grade B violations. The Government declined to file a brief; and Scott did not file a pro se supplemental brief. Finding no error, we affirm.

At the revocation hearing, Scott admitted the use/possession violations alleged in the petition, but argued that the violations should be classified as Grade C violations instead of Grade B violations. However, given Scott’s prior conviction for distribution of cocaine, his possession and use of marijuana would carry a sentence of up to two years, if prosecuted under 21 U.S.C. § 844(a) (2012). Thus, the violations were properly considered to be Grade B violations. *See United States v. Wynn,*786 F.3d 339, 342-44 (4th Cir. 2015); U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 7B1.1(a), p.s. (2016).

In accordance with *Anders,*we have reviewed the entire record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore affirm the revocation of Scott’s supervised release and his sentence. This court requires that counsel inform Scott, in writing, of the right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Scott requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on Scott. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
# Apalachicola River and Bay Facts

The Apalachicola River basin includ es the Apalachicola National Estuarine Research Reserve (ANERR). The second largest of 25 reserves in the National Re serve System. The major objectives of the Reserve are research and education. The River & Bay Watershed is one of the most impo rtant bird habitats in the southeastern U.S.

More than 360 marine mollusks are found in th e watershed, many of these are endangered. The Apalachicola River basin stands out as one of the l ast ecosystems that retains much of its incredible natural resources. 131 species of fresh and estuarine fish live in the Ap alachicola River, more than any other river in Florida. The Apalachicola River basin contains 127 of the very rarest species of plants and vertebrates and has the highest density of amphibians and reptiles in North American, north of Mexico. The Apalachicola drainage basin boasts more than 1300 species of plants, 103 of which are threatened or endangered. More than 50 species of mammals, including the th reatened Florida black bear, the endangered West Indian Manatee, the Indiana bat, and the gray bat are found in the Apalachicola drainage basin. More than 1300 plant species, 40 amphibians species and 80 species of reptiles live within the Apalachicola River basin, this is the highest diversity of amphibians and reptiles in the US and Canada. The Apalachicola River basin has more than 180 sp ecies of fish and the area is a tremendous spawning and nursery ground for important commercial and sports fish species. Endangered or potentially endangered species such as th e Atlanta sturgeon, blue stripped shiner, shoal bass and Suwannee bass are found in the Apalachicola River basin. The Apalachicola River is the fresh water source for the Apalachicola Bay, a pristine and productive estuary of major economic and ecological importance to the northern Gulf of Mexico. The Apalachicola Bay is one of the most productive estuaries in the northern hemisphere. The productivity of the bay is dependent on the Apalachicol a River to carry fresh water and essential nutrients down stream to feed estuarine organisms. The Apalachicola Bay provides 90% of Florida’s oysters and over 10% of the total US production. The Apalachicola Bay is a major nursery for penaeid sh rimp, blue crabs, and many fish species including striped bass, sturgeon, grouper, red fish, speckled trout, and flounder. Harvest of shrimp, crab, fish, and oysters is the driving force in the economy of Franklin County.
Order filed June 12, 2014

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00362

- CV

____________ KAREN GUISHARD , Appellant

V.

MONEY MANAGEMENT INT ERNATIONAL, INC./CON SUMER CREDIT

COUNSELING SERVICES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 268th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 13

- DCV

- 209271



### O R D E R
The notice of appeal in this case was filed May 7, 2014. The clerk’s record was filed June 3, 2014 . To date, the filing fee h as not been paid. No evidence that appellant has established indigence has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P

. 20.1. Therefore, the court issues the following order.Appellant is ordered to pay the filing fee to the c lerk of this court on or

before June 27, 2014. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If a ppellant fails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 728 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 7050 Highway BB in Cedar Hill, Missouri, 

as the ‘‘Sergeant First Class William B. Woods, Jr. 

Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 728 EH

1 SECTION 1. SERGEANT FIRST CLASS WILLIAM B. WOODS, 

2 JR. POST OFFICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 7050 Highway BB in Cedar Hill, 

5 Missouri, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant 

6 First Class William B. Woods, Jr. Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant First Class 

11 William B. Woods, Jr. Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 15, 2015. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 728 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postliam B. Woods, Jr. Post Office’’. Hill, Missouri, as the ‘‘Sergeant First Class Wil- al Service located at 7050 Highway BB in Cedar
1

Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 12:24 PM

To: 'lehto@kennon.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov'

Subject: Petition for Exemption: Motown Digital, LLC (Docket No. FAA-2015-0529)

May 28, 2015 

Dear Mr. Lehto: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-0529). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition. 

 Describe the aircraft make, model, and type (i.e. - fixed-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the 

proposed UAS operation. The description should include the maximum weight (including 

payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual. 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by 

Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and 

remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the 

requested response date listed below. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit 

any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e-mail to 

333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information 

described above by June 11, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without 

notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

Nia Daniels 

Program Analyst 

Nia Daniels, ARM‐108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075

nia.daniels@faa.gov
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7110

GEORGE D. GATES, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden; UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondents – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:07-cv-01212-LO-TCB)

Submitted: October 21, 2008 Decided: October 29, 2008

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George D. Gates, Appellant Pro Se. Yiris E. Cornwall, Catherine DeRoever Wood, Assistant United States Attorneys, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: George D. Gates appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Gates’ 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition, and its orders denying Gates’ motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons state by the district court. Gates v. Stansberry , No. 1:07-cv-01212-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. May 23, 2008; filed June 17, 2008; entered June 19, 2008; filed June 30, 2008; entered July 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

The undersigned executiveofficer of First Federal Bancshares of Arkansas, Inc. (the “Registrant”) herebycertifies that the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31,2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained thereinfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.
|        |   | /s/ Larry J. Brandt     |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Larry J. Brandt         |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer |

Date:  May 8, 2007

 

 

** **

----
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTS OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wireless Xcessories Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report"), I Stephen
Rade, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By /s/ Stephen Rade
   ---------------------
   Stephen Rade
   Chief Executive Officer
   May 15, 2007
EXHIBIT 31



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED



I, Joseph R. Rozelle, certify that:



1.   I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Summit Growth Corporation;



2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  November 24, 2009



/s/    Joseph R. Rozelle

------------------------------------

Joseph R. Rozelle

Principal Executive Officer

and Principal Financial Officer
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 220

In recognition of Ronald Reagan’s 85th birthday.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 1, 1996

Mr. DOLE (for himself, Mr. DASCHLE, and Mr. WARNER) submitted the

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

In recognition of Ronald Reagan’s 85th birthday.

Whereas February 6, 1996, is the 85th birthday of Ronald

Wilson Reagan;

Whereas Ronald Reagan was twice elected by overwhelming

margins as President of the United States;

Whereas Ronald Reagan is loved and admired by millions of

Americans, and by countless others around the world;

Whereas Ronald Reagan, with the leadership of his wife,

Nancy, led a national crusade against illegal drugs;

Whereas Ronald Reagan’s eloquence united Americans in

times of triumph and tragedy;

Whereas the thoughts and prayers of the Senate and the

country are with Ronald Reagan in his courageous battle

with Alzheimer’s disease: Now, therefore, be it
2

SRES 220 ATS

1 Resolved, That the Senate of the United States ex2 tends its birthday greetings and best wishes to Ronald

3 Reagan.

4 SEC. 2. That the Secretary of the Senate shall trans5 mit a copy of this resolution to Ronald Reagan.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



The undersigned, Eugene Seymour, MD, Chief
Executive and Financial Officer of NanoViricides, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the annual report on Form 10-K of NanoViricides, Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
        all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NanoViricides, Inc.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: October 15, 2012 | /s/ Eugene Seymour, MD                                                           
|---------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       | Name: Eugene Seymour, MD                                                         
|                       | Title: Chief Executive Officer and
        Interim Financial Officer and Director
|                       | (principal executive and accounting officer)                                     



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to NanoViricides, Inc.
and will be retained by NanoViricides, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.