2007 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 4-18-2007 

# U SA v . G arne r P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 06-2406

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2007

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou ght t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit or y

. It h as be e n a c c ept e d for inclusion in 2007 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c ont a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion " U SA v . G a r ne r " (2007). 2007 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1261. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2007/1261NOT P RE CE DE NT I AL UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT

____________ N o. 06- 2406

____________ UNI TE D ST ATE S OF AM ERI CA

v. M ARCUS GARNER, A p p e llan t.

____________ O n A p p ea l from the U n it ed S tat es D istri ct C o u rt f o r th e M id d le D istric t o f P e n n sy lv a n ia ( N o. 05- cr - 0205) D istric t Ju d g e : H o n . W ill iam W . C a ld w e ll Subm i t t ed U nderT hi r d C i r cui tL A R 34. 1( a)

M ar ch 29, 2007 B efore: R E N D E L L , B A R R Y , and C H A G A R E S , C i rcui tJudg es.

____________ ( Fi l ed: A pr i l 18, 2007 ) OP I NI ON O F THE COURT C H A G A R E S, C i r cui tJ udge. C ouns el forM ar cus G arnerpet i t i ons t hi s C our tforper m i s s i on t o w i t hdr aw fr om r epr es ent at i on of G arnerpur s uantt o A nder s v. C al i forni a, 386 U . S. 738 ( 1967) . For t heB eca us e G arnerhas notfi l ed a pr o s e br i ef, w e do notknow w haterr orhe as s i gns 1 to th e D istric t C o u rt. 2 r eas ons t hatfol l ow , w e w i l l gr antt he mot i on and af fi r m G arner ’ s convi ct i on and s ent ence . O n O ct ober12, 2005, a gr and j ur yr etur ned a tw o- counti ndi ct m entchar gi ng G a rn e r w ith in ter sta te tra v e l in a id o f ra c k e tee rin g a n d p o ss e ss io n o f c ra c k c o c a in e w ith inten t t o d istri b u te i n v iolati o n o f 1 8 U . S . C . § 1 9 5 2 an d 2 1 U . S . C . § 8 4 1 (a)(1), r es pect i vel y . Pur s uantt o a pl ea a gr eement , G arnerpl ed gui l t yt o t he r acke t eer i ng char ge on D ece m ber12, 2005. I n excha nge forG arner ’ s pl ea of gui l t y , t he G overnm entagr eed to d ism iss th e d ru g p o ss e ss io n c h a rg e , an d to re c o m m e n d a tw o -le v e l re d u c tio n in G arner ’ s offe ns e l evel , w hi ch i tdi d. T her eaf t er , t he D i s t r i ctC our tcomm i s s i oned the pr epar at i on of a Pr es ent ence R e p o rt (P S R ). T h e P S R d e ter m in e d th a t G a rn e r’s to tal o f f e n se lev e l w a s 2 6 , an d h is cr i m i nal hi s t or yw as cat egoryI V , w hi ch corr es ponded t o a G ui del i ne r ange of 92- 115 m ont hs . B eca us e the s t atut or ym axi m um G arnercoul d r ece i ve w as 60 m ont hs , hi s actual expos ur e w as s ubs t ant i al l yl es s t han hi s G ui del i ne r ange w oul d i ndi cat e. G arnerm ade no o b j e c t i o n s t o t h e P S R. O n A pr i l 13, 2006, t he D i s t r i ctC our ts ent ence d G arnert o 60 m ont hs i m pr i s onm ent . T hi s appea l ens ued. 1 T he A nder s br i ef s ubm i t t ed t o t hi s C our tdemonst r at es t hatG arner ’ s at t or neyhas “thor oughl yexami ned the r ecor d i n s ear ch of a ppeal abl e i s s ues , ” and ha s expl ai ned w hy anyi s s ues ar guabl ys uppor t i ng t he appe al ar e fr i vol ous . U ni t ed St at es v. Y oul a, 241 F. 3d3

296, 300 ( 3d C i r . 2001) . M or eover , an i ndepende ntr evi ew of “thos e por t i ons of the r ecor d i dent i fi ed by[the] A nder s br i ef” r evea l s no non- fr i vol ous i s s ues G arnerm i ght pr ofi t abl yr ai s e on appe al . I d. at301. A ccor di ngl y , w e w i l l gr antt he A nder s m ot i on and af firm G arn er’s co n v ict ion an d sen tenc e w ith o u t app o inti n g n ew co u n sel. S ee 3 d C ir . L . A . R . 109. 2.