alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

United States Commission on Civil Rights.

# ACTION:

Notice of Commission public business meeting.

# DATES:

Friday, March 11, 2022, 12 p.m. EST.

# ADDRESSES:

Meeting to take place by telephone and is open to the public by telephone: 1-877-222-5769, Conference ID #: 7593815.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Angelia Rorison: 202-376-7700;                         *publicaffairs@usccr.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the Government in Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), the Commission on Civil Rights is holding a meeting to discuss the Commission's business for the month of January. This business meeting is open to the public. Computer assisted real-time transcription (CART) will be provided. The web link to access CART (in English) on Friday, March 11, 2022, is                     *https://www.streamtext.net/​player?​event=​USCCR.*                     Please note that CART is text-only translation that occurs in real time during the meeting and is not an exact transcript.                

## Meeting Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda

II. Business Meeting

A. Presentations by State Advisory Committee Chairs on Released Reports and Memorandums

B. Discussion and Vote on Advisory Committee Appointments

C. Discussion and Vote to Appoint Samantha Le as interim Chair of the Maine Advisory Committee

D. Discussion and Vote to Appoint Wayne Heard as Chair of the Washington, DC Advisory Committee

E. Management and Operations
    - Staff Director's Report

III. Adjourn Meeting

Dated: March 3, 2022.

Angelia Rorison,

USCCR Media and Communications Director.

[FR Doc. 2022-04880 Filed 3-3-22; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7462

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

THOMAS MONIQUE BRADDY, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, 

District Judge. (4:07-cr-00048-RBS-TEM-1)

Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 5, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Monique Braddy, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Howard Jacob 

Zlotnick, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Monique Braddy, Jr., appeals the district 

court’s order construing his “Motion for Rescission of Plea 

Contract” as an unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2010) motion and dismissing it on that basis. The order 

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Braddy has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
----

**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Harry Miller, President and Chief Financial Officer of PreferentialEquities Corp., certify that:

I have reviewed this annual report of Preferential Equities Corp.;
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have: 
 
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such  disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to  ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within  those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being  prepared;
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure  controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the  effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the  period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's  internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small  business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially  affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business  issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and
 

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 
 
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or  operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably  likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,  process, summarize and report financial information; and
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other  employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal  control over financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2008  /s/ Harry Miller Harry Miller, Chief  Financial Officer
#### Michael Charles PILOT, Appellant v. Colleen KOLLAR-KOTELLY, Personally and Individual; USDJ, et al., Appellees

No. 17-5201

September Term, 2017

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Filed On: January 22, 2018

Michael Charles Pilot, Pro Se

*2R. Craig Lawrence, U.S. Attorney’s Office, (USA) Civil Division, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellees

BEFORE: Rogers and Tatel, Circuit Judges, and Ginsburg, Senior Circuit Judge

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on appellant’s brief. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 84(3). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders filed July 18, 2017, and August 9, 2017 be affirmed. Appellant has failed to demonstrate any error in the district court’s dismissal of his complaint on the grounds that it was frivolous, failed to state a claim, and sought damages against an immune defendant. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Nor has he shown any abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial of his motion for reconsideration. See Firestone v. Firestone, 76 F.3d 1205, 1208 (D.C. Cir. 1996).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
#### Diane ROSENBERG; Mark Meyer; John A. Ansell, III; Kenneth Savitz; Jennifer Rochino; Caroline Fields, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Dianna FORD, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-1978

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 16, 2017

Decided: November 20, 2017

Dianna Ford, Appellant Pro Se.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dianna Ford has noted an appeal from the district court’s order remanding a removed foreclosure action to Maryland *182state court. “[A] district court may remand a case *sua aponte*for lack of subject matter jurisdiction at any time, 28 U.S.G. § 1447(c) [ (2012) ], and such an order is not renewable, *id,*§ 1447(d).” *Doe v. Blair,*819 F.3d 64, 66-67 (4th Cir. 2016). The district court remanded Ford’s removed action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, explaining that the complaint did not present a federal question and that diversity of citizenship was lacking. Because the district court remanded the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, we lack jurisdiction to review its order. *Id.*Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 224

To designate September 23, 1996, as ‘‘National Baseball Heritage Day’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 6, 1996

Mr. D’AMATO (for himself and Mr. MOYNIHAN) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

To designate September 23, 1996, as ‘‘National Baseball

Heritage Day’’.

Whereas it is universally accepted that the idea of baseball

was created by Abner Doubleday in 1839 in Cooperstown, New York when Doubleday attempted to chase

cows out of Elihu Phinney’s cow pasture;

Whereas, New Yorkers in Manhattan in 1842 witnessed the

birth of modern day baseball when ‘‘a number of gentlemen . . . casually assembled on a plot of ground on

Twenty-seventh street . . . to play ball’’ according to

Charles A. Peverelly in The Book of American Pastimes;

Whereas these men, led by Alexander Joy Cartwright, Jr.,

created the set of rules to transform a childhood game

into the game of baseball and to provide a model for future early clubs;
2

SRES 224 IS

Whereas these men played the game because of sheer enjoyment and casually called themselves the ‘‘New York

Baseball Club’’;

Whereas Harold Peterson, in The Man Who Invented Baseball, notes that on the historic day of September 23,

1845, these men, now numbering more than forty, formally organized themselves into the first ever organized

baseball club known as the ‘‘Knickerbocker Baseball

Club’’;

Whereas the Knickerbockers dedicated their efforts to the

creation of regular games on the Twenty-seventh street

field so they could play their new game;

Whereas others noticed the games of the Knickerbockers and

created teams of their own for inter-club play with Alexander Joy Cartwright, Jr. and the Knickerbockers, according to Cartwright’s ‘‘Rules of Play’’;

Whereas baseball has grown into America’s national pastime

and ingratiated itself into the collective heart of America;

Whereas America has cherished baseball and fallen in love

with baseball heroes like Mickey Mantle, Jackie Robinson, Willie Mays, and Babe Ruth;

Whereas baseball has given Americans a common and shared

experience, as well as provide a bond between generations;

Whereas parents and children enjoy baseball together

throughout the countless generations;

Whereas baseball has become as much a part of the United

States as the hot dogs sold at the games;

Whereas baseball has become a part of our national character; and
3

SRES 224 IS

Whereas the designation of ‘‘National Baseball Heritage

Day’’ will provide Americans with a chance to celebrate

the history of the game and reflect on how much it has

affected our collective lives and national identity: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate, in recognition of the es2 sential role that baseball has played in the history of the

3 United States and our individual lives, designate Septem4 ber 23, 1996 as ‘‘National Baseball Heritage Day’’. The

5 President is authorized and requested to issue a proclama6 tion calling upon the people of the United States to ob7 serve such a day with appropriate ceremonies and activi8 ties.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 11677]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the exhibition “Portable Universe/El Universo en Tus Manos: Thought and Splendor of Indigenous Colombia” at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art, Los Angeles, California; at the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, in Houston, Texas, under the title “Golden Worlds: The Portable Universe of Indigenous Colombia”; and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Stacy E. White,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2022-05710 Filed 3-17-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 26 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 26

  A resolution making majority party appointments to the Governmental 
               Affairs Committee for the 104th Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 5, 1995

 Mr. Cochran (for Mr. Dole) submitted the following resolution; which 
                      was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  A resolution making majority party appointments to the Governmental 
               Affairs Committee for the 104th Congress.

    Resolved, That the following shall constitute the majority party's 
membership on the following standing committee for the 104th Congress, 
or until their successors are chosen:
    Committee on Governmental Affairs: Mr. Roth, Mr. Stevens, Mr. 
Cohen, Mr. Thompson, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Grassley, Mr. McCain, and Mr. 
Smith.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 54 (Monday, March 21, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 16016]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05904]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4534-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]


Idaho; Amendment No. 7 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland 
Security (DHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Idaho (FEMA-4534-DR), dated April 9, 2020, and related 
determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on March 4, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Willie G. Nunn, 
of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for 
this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Vincent J. Maykovich as 
Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022-05904 Filed 3-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 713 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 713

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to disallow the refundable 
  portion of the child credit to taxpayers using individual taxpayer 
     identification numbers issued by the Internal Revenue Service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2015

 Mr. Bucshon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to disallow the refundable 
  portion of the child credit to taxpayers using individual taxpayer 
     identification numbers issued by the Internal Revenue Service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISALLOWANCE OF REFUNDABLE PORTION OF CHILD CREDIT FOR 
              TAXPAYERS USING ITINS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (e) of section 24 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows:
    ``(e) Identification Requirements.--
            ``(1) In general.--No credit shall be allowed under this 
        section to a taxpayer with respect to any qualifying child 
        unless the taxpayer includes the name and taxpayer 
        identification number of such qualifying child on the return of 
        tax for the taxable year.
            ``(2) Special rule relating to refundable portion of 
        credit.--No credit shall be allowed under this section by 
        reason of subsection (d) with respect to a taxpayer if the 
        identifying number of such taxpayer, and, in the case of a 
        joint return, of the taxpayer's spouse, is an individual 
        taxpayer identification number (known as an ITIN) issued by the 
        Secretary.''.
    (b) Mathematical or Clerical Error.--
            (1) In general.--Paragraph (2) of section 6213(g) of such 
        Code is amended by striking ``and'' at the end of subparagraph 
        (M), by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (O) and 
        inserting ``, and'', and by inserting before the last sentence 
        the following:
                    ``(O) an entry on a return claiming the credit 
                under section 24 by reason of subsection (d) thereof if 
                such credit is disallowed by section 24(e)(2).''.
            (2) Conforming amendment.--Subparagraph (I) of section 
        6213(g)(1) of such Code is amended by striking ``section 
        24(e)'' and inserting ``section 24(e)(1)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2014.
                                 <all>
```