alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                       3,980,760
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   89,469
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,000
<INVENTORY>                                     11,365
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,231,677
<PP&E>                                         528,675
<DEPRECIATION>                                  73,863
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,231,677
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          387,320
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,182,671
<OTHER-SE>                                   (880,348)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,231,677
<SALES>                                        219,668
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               219,668
<CGS>                                          160,766
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  192,545
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               159,248
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (133,643)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (133,843)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (89,074)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 32003R1748 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32003R1748

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1748/2003 of 2 October 2003 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables **

*
Official Journal L 251 , 03/10/2003 P. 0001 - 0002 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1748/2003

of 2 October 2003

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1947/2002(2), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in the Annex thereto.

(2) In compliance with the above criteria, the standard import values must be fixed at the levels set out in the Annex to this Regulation,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 3 October 2003.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 October 2003.

For the Commission

J. M. Silva Rodríguez

Agriculture Director-General

(1) OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66.

(2) OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 17.

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 2 October 2003 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

>TABLE>
#### Kevin James TEEMAN; Andrea Joy Lyons, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. YAKIMA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-35634

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2017 *

Filed March 21, 2017

Kevin James Teeman, Pro Se

Andrea Joy Lyons, Pro Se

Stefanie Jean Weigand, Attorney, Yakima County .Prosecuting Attorney, Corporate Counsel Division, Yakima, WA, for Defendants-Appellees

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument, See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2),

MEMORANDUM **

Kevin James Teeman and Andrea Joy Lyons appeal pro se from the district *641court’s summary judgment in their. 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations arising from the temporary, war-rantless removal of their children. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Burke v. County of Alameda,*586 F.3d 725, 730 (9th Cir. 2009), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Teeman and Joy failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether the warrantless removal was impermissible. *See Jones v. County of Los Angeles,*802 F.3d 990, 1000 (9th Cir. 2015) (warrantless removal of a child is permissible if there is “reasonable cause to believe that the child is likely to experience serious bodily harm in the .time that would be required to obtain a warrant”); *see also Mabe v. San Bernardino County,*237 F.3d 1101, 1109-11 (9th Cir. 2001) (setting forth requirements for supervisory and municipal liability under § 1983).

We reject as without merit Teeman and Lyons’s contentions regarding the Freedom of Information Act.

We do not consider issues raised by Teeman and Lyons in their brief that are not supported by argument. *See Acosta-Huerta v. Estelle,*7 F.3d 139, 144 (9th Cir. 1992).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid*641ed by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

DEMONE RUSHING, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 2D23-1834 November 15, 2023 Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
#### NETLIST, INC., Appellant v. SANDISK LLC, Cross-Appellant

2016-2274, 2016-2275, 2016-2338, 2016-2339

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

November 14, 2017

Thomas J. Wimbiscus, McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd., Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by Wayne Bradley, Scott P. McBride, Gregory Schodde, Ronald Spuhler.

Jon Wright, Stérne Kessler Goldstein & Fox, PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for cross-appellant. Also represented by Lori A. Gordon, Pauline Pelletier, Robert Evan Sokohl,

(Prost, Chief Judge, Wallach and Hughes, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and'Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gensym Corporation (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, Robert Ashton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                                      
|------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: June 6, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Robert Ashton                    
|                    |  |  |  | Robert Ashton                        
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                         Hylan Shoob, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Global Health, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop H21-9, Atlanta, Georgia 30329-4027, Telephone: (404) 639-4796; Email:                         *HShoob@cdc.gov*.                    

                        The Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Kalwant Smagh,

Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2022-05752 Filed 3-17-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 767 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 767

To amend the Clean Air Act to extend the deadline for the imposition of 
 sanctions under section 179 of the Act that relate to a State vehicle 
      inspection and maintenance program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                  May 9 (legislative day, May 1), 1995

 Mr. Domenici introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Clean Air Act to extend the deadline for the imposition of 
 sanctions under section 179 of the Act that relate to a State vehicle 
      inspection and maintenance program, and for other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF SANCTIONS DEADLINE.

    (a) Extension.--Section 179(a) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 
7509(a)) is amended in the matter following paragraph (4) by inserting 
``(or, in the case of a requirement relating to a State vehicle 
inspection and maintenance program, 30 months)'' after ``18 months''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect with respect to any finding, disapproval, or determination 
made under section 179(a) of the Clean Air Act after the date that is 
18 months prior to the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

EXHIBIT 10.53  


 
 

AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE
  TO THE
  UNIVERSAL COMPRESSION, INC.
  EMPLOYEES' SUPPLEMENTAL SAVINGS PLAN    
  


        WHEREAS, Universal Compression, Inc. (the "Company") maintains the Universal Compression, Inc. Employees' Supplemental Savings Plan, effective
July 1, 1998 (the "Plan"); 


        WHEREAS,
Section 11.1 of the Plan reserves to the Company the right to amend the Plan by action of its Board of Directors (the "Board"); and 



        WHEREAS,
the Board has approved the amendment to the Plan to provide that each eligible employee executing a Supplemental Salary Deferral Agreement may defer a percentage of his
compensation in a whole percentage amount not to exceed twenty-five percent (25%); 


        NOW,
THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 



        Section 3.3(b)
of the Plan is hereby amended, effective January 1, 2002, to read as follows: 



"Each
Eligible Employee executing a Supplemental Salary Deferral Agreement shall elect in such agreement to defer a percentage of his Compensation (the "Supplemental Salary Deferral Percentage") in a
whole percentage amount of not less than two percent (2%) and not more than twenty-five percent (25%) of such Compensation." 





        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, and as evidence of the adoption of this amendment by the Company, the undersigned officer being duly authorized has signed this amendment this 1st day
of January, 2002, to be effective as of January 1, 2002. 



	 	 	UNIVERSAL COMPRESSION, INC.
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/  MARK L. CARLTON      

	 	 	Name:	 	Mark L. Carlton

	 	 	Title:	 	Sr. Vice President












QuickLinks


AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO THE UNIVERSAL COMPRESSION, INC. EMPLOYEES' SUPPLEMENTAL SAVINGS PLAN
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jun-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jul-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                               4,712
<SECURITIES>                                         5,653
<RECEIVABLES>                                       15,762
<ALLOWANCES>                                           676
<INVENTORY>                                             54
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    26,083
<PP&E>                                              13,818
<DEPRECIATION>                                       9,907
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      42,860
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               21,821
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               105
<OTHER-SE>                                          10,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        42,860
<SALES>                                             29,274
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    29,274
<CGS>                                               11,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       25,494
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     2,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     138
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1,865
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1,044
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    821
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           821
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.08
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 107 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 107

 To commend the Huskies of the University of Connecticut for capping a 
      perfect season by winning the 1995 NCAA Women's Basketball 
                             Championship.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                April 6 (legislative day, April 5), 1995

   Mr. Dodd (for himself and Mr. Lieberman) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To commend the Huskies of the University of Connecticut for capping a 
      perfect season by winning the 1995 NCAA Women's Basketball 
                             Championship.

Whereas UConn women's team won the school's first-ever national basketball 
        championship by defeating the University of Tennessee by the score of 
        70-64;
Whereas the UConn Huskies became only the second women's basketball team in NCAA 
        history to finish the season undefeated, and the first basketball team 
        of any kind in NCAA history to finish 35-0;
Whereas UConn Head Coach Geno Auriemma was the recipient of the Naismith 
        National Coach of the Year Award, as well as the Associated Press Coach 
        of the Year and the United States Basketball Writers Association Coach 
        of the Year awards;
Whereas UConn forward and co-captain Rebecca Lobo was the consensus choice of 
        those same organizations as the National Player of the Year, and was 
        named the Most Outstanding Player of the NCAA Women's Final Four;
Whereas Rebecca Lobo was also named the GTE Women's Basketball National Academic 
        All-American of the Year for her outstanding achievement in the 
        classroom;
Whereas the UConn Women Huskies enthralled the entire State of Connecticut, 
        providing it with one of its finest moments; and
Whereas the UConn Women Huskies elevated the sport of women's basketball to new 
        heights, and inspired a generation of young girls in Connecticut to 
        aspire toward their own ``hoop dreams'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate commends the Huskies of the University of 
Connecticut for capping a perfect season by winning the 1995 NCAA 
Women's Basketball Championship.
                                 <all>
```
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 798 

To amend the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 to prohibit 

the flying of unmanned recreational aircraft near commercial airports. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2015 

Mr. MEEKS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 

to prohibit the flying of unmanned recreational aircraft 

near commercial airports. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Responsible Skies Act 

5 of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE FLYING OF UNMANNED REC7 REATIONAL AIRCRAFT NEAR COMMERCIAL 

8 AIRPORTS. 

9 Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform 

10 Act of 2012 (49 U.S.C. 40101 note) is amended— 


ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 798 IH

1 (1) in subsection (c) by striking the period at 

2 the end and inserting ; and ‘‘, including that the op3 erator of an unmanned recreational aircraft may not 

4 fly the aircraft— 

5 ‘‘(1) above 400 feet and within 5 miles of the perim6 eter of an airport that provides scheduled passenger air 

7 transportation; or 

8 ‘‘(2) where it may be seem from the perimeter of the 

9 airport.’’; and 

10 (2) by inserting at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(d) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than one 

12 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 

13 year thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a 

14 report containing— 

15 ‘‘(1) a description of any incident in which an 

16 unmanned recreational aircraft flew above 400 feet 

17 less than 5 miles from the perimeter of an airport 

18 that provides scheduled passenger air transportation; 

19 and 

20 ‘‘(2) the action taken by the Secretary in re21 sponse to the incident. 

22 ‘‘(e) DEFINITION OF UNMANNED RECREATIONAL

23 AIRCRAFT.—In this section, the term ‘unmanned recVerDate Sep 11 2014 20:00 Feb 13, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H798.IH H798

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 798 IH

1 reational aircraft’ means an unmanned aircraft flown for 

2 hobby or recreational purposes.’’. 

Æ 


ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Oscar Anotnio MARTINEZ-GARCIA; Francisco Martinez-Garcia, Petitioners, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent. Oscar Anotnio Martinez-Garcia; Francisco Martinez-Garcia, Petitioners, v. Jefferson B. Sessions III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 16-2448, No. 17-1675

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 22, 2017

Decided: January 11, 2018

Evelyn R.G. Smallwood, HATCH ROCKERS IMMIGRATION, Durham, North Carolina, for Petitioners. Chad A. Readier, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Keith I. McManus, Assistant Director, Juria L. Jones, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPART*128MENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Oscar A. Martinez-Garcia and Francisco Martinez-Garcia, brothers and natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing their appeal of the Immigration Judge’s decision denying their requests for asylum and withholding of removal,* and denying their motion to reconsider.

With respect to the Board’s order dismissing the appeal, we have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of the merits hearing and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the agency’s factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision, *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 481, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review in part for the reasons stated by the Board. *See In re Martinez-Garcia*(B.I.A. Dec. 12, 2016). As no arguments have been raised on appeal with respect to the denial of the motion to reconsider, we dismiss the petition for review in part as to that order. *See In re Martinez-Garcia*(B.I.A. May 8, 2017); *Suarez-Valenzuela v. Holder,*714 F.3d 241, 248-49 (4th Cir. 2013) (absent a miscarriage of justice, arguments not raised in opening brief are waived).

Accordingly, we deny in part, and dismiss in part, the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DENIED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART*

*

On appeal, petitioners do not challenge the agency’s denial of protection under the Convention Against Torture.