alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                  PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IRIDEX Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending April 3, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Report"), Theodore A. Boutacoff,
Chief  Executive  Officer, and Larry Tannenbaum, Chief Financial Officer, of the
Company,  each  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)   The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: May 18, 2004


                                   By:  /s/  THEODORE  A.  BOUTACOFF
                                   ---------------------------------
                                   Name: Theodore A. Boutacoff
                                   Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
                                              (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: May 18, 2004

                                   By:  /s/  LARRY  TANNENBAUM
                                   ---------------------------
                                   Name: Larry Tannenbaum
                                   Title: Chief Financial Officer and Vice
                                   President, Administration
                                   (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


<PAGE>
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 833

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to more accurately codify

the depreciable life of semiconductor manufacturing equipment.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 19 (legislative day, MAY 15), 1995

Mr. HATCH (for himself, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. DOLE, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. COHEN, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. KYL, Mr. BENNETT, Mr. CRAIG,

Mr. D’AMATO, Mr. BURNS, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, and Mrs. BOXER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to more accurately codify the depreciable life of semiconductor manufacturing equipment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Semiconductor Invest5 ment Act of 1995’’.
2

•S 833 IS

1 SEC. 2. 3-YEAR DEPRECIABLE LIFE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR

2 MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section

4 168(e)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating

5 to classification of property) is amended by striking ‘‘and’’

6 at the end of clause (i), by striking the period at the end

7 of clause (ii) and inserting ‘‘, and’’, and by adding at the

8 end the following new clause:

9 ‘‘(iii) any semiconductor manufactur10 ing equipment.’’

11 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

12 (1) Subparagraph (B) of section 168(e)(3) of

13 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by

14 striking clause (ii) and by redesignating clauses (iii),

15 (iv), (v), and (vi) as clauses (ii), (iii), (iv), and (v),

16 respectively.

17 (2) Subparagraph (B) of section 168(g)(3) of

18 such Code is amended by striking the following:

‘‘(B)(ii) ............................................................................... 5’’

19 and inserting the following:

‘‘(A)(iii) ............................................................................... 3’’.

20 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

21 this section shall apply to equipment placed in service

22 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
V 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 808 

To authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor to James Megellas, 

formerly of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, and currently of Colleyville, Texas, 

for acts of valor on January 28, 1945, during the Battle of the Bulge 

in World War II. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2015 

Mr. GROTHMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor 

to James Megellas, formerly of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, 

and currently of Colleyville, Texas, for acts of valor on 

January 28, 1945, during the Battle of the Bulge in 

World War II. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF THE MEDAL 

4 OF HONOR TO JAMES MEGELLAS FOR ACTS 

5 OF VALOR DURING BATTLE OF THE BULGE. 

6 (a) WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.—Notwith7 standing the time limitations specified in section 3744 of 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 808 IH

1 title 10, United States Code, or any other time limitation 

2 with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons 

3 who served in the Armed Forces, the President may award 

4 the Medal of Honor under section 3741 of such title to 

5 James Megellas, formerly of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, and 

6 currently of Colleyville, Texas, for the acts of valor during 

7 World War II described in subsection (b). 

8 (b) ACTS OF VALOR DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor 

9 referred to in subsection (a) are the actions of James 

10 Megellas on January 28, 1945, in Herresbach, Belgium, 

11 during the Battle of the Bulge when, as a first lieutenant 

12 in the 82d Airborne Division, he led a surprise and dev13 astating attack on a much larger advancing enemy force, 

14 killing and capturing a large number and causing others 

15 to flee, single-handedly destroying an attacking German 

16 Mark V tank with two hand-held grenades, and then lead17 ing his men in clearing and seizing Herresbach. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Lunar Growth Corporation (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, the undersigned officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  February 15, 2010

/s/    Joseph R. Rozelle



JOSEPH R. ROZELLE

Principal Executive Officer

and Principal Financial Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Quatrail PAIR, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6686

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 9, 2017

Decided: November 22, 2017

Quatrail Pair, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Katherine Cooley, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Rudy E. Renfer, Assistant United States Attorneys, Tobin Webb Lathan, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appel-lee.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Quatrail Pair appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion and his motion for transfer to federal custody. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Pair,*No. 5:12-cr-00400-D-1 (E.D.N.C. May 17, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Balance
Sheet, Statement of Operations, Statement of Cash Flows and Notes thereto
incorporated in Part I, Item 1. of this Form 10-QSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                         282,273
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  143,627
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    426,688
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               870,776
<PP&E>                                       3,419,803
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,906,805
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          267,935
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,977
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,090,422
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,906,805
<SALES>                                         52,345
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,345
<CGS>                                           25,494
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,474
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               341,673
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,311
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (327,133)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (327,133)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (327,133)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Frankie L. DOCTOR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Warden MANSUKHANI, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 15-6020

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit,

Submitted: October 27, 2017

Decided: January 11, 2018

Frankie Lane Doctor, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Frankie Lane Doctor, Sr., a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.*
      *Doctor v. Mansukhani,*No. 0:14-cv-00425-JFA, 2014 WL 7670120 (D.S.C. Dec. 19, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*

We previously granted Doctor’s motion for authorization to file a successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 in light of *Johnson v. United States,*— U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015). Doctor filed a motion in accordance with that authorization, and the motion is pending in the district court.
EXHIBIT 31



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED



I, Joseph R. Rozelle, certify that:



1.   I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of China Growth Corporation;



2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  November 24, 2009



/s/    Joseph R. Rozelle

------------------------------------

Joseph R. Rozelle

Principal Executive Officer

and Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CleanTech Innovations, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Bei Lu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m or §78o(d)); and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: February 22, 2011
By:
/s/ Bei LuBei Lu

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)





This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6296 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6296

               For the relief of Yeganeh Salehi Rezaian.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 2016

 Mr. Huffman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               For the relief of Yeganeh Salehi Rezaian.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF CERTAIN NATURALIZATION REQUIREMENTS FOR YEGANEH 
              SALEHI REZAIAN.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding her inability to meet the 
requirements of section 319(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act 
relating to residence and physical presence in the United States, 
Yeganeh Salehi Rezaian shall be deemed eligible for naturalization upon 
the filing of the appropriate application, if otherwise qualified for 
naturalization under such Act.
    (b) Period for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsection (a) 
shall apply only if the application for naturalization is filed with 
appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
OSIEL ALVAREZ PDR NO. 

### -(EOfciVtDIK 

# v. COANO. 11-14-00294-CR ^OURTOfopimimaiAPPEALS „m m

__ mrn„,0 TRIAL COURT NO. A-42,672 nr_ 

## STATE OF TEXAS t£C 222016 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

## AbelAcosta. Clerk AT AUSTIN, TEXAS woua, v/i©ll\ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRECTIONARY REVIEW ALONG WITH MOTION TO SUSPEND TRAP 9.3 (b) (1) COMES NOW, OSIEL ALVAREZ, TDCJ-CID NO. 01967111, IN THE ABOVE REFERENCED CAUSE NUMBERS AND FILES THIS MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME REQUESTING AN EXTENSION OF 

### 60 DAYS IN WHICH TO FILE ALONG WITH MOTION TO SUSPEND TRAP 9.3 AW.XjU-AND-TO, 

### OUUHfOFCRIMINALAPPEALS SUPPORT SHOWS THE FOLLOWING: p-r, ^^ I. 

# PETITIONERWAS CONVICTED INTHE 70TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF ECTOfP^OUnWJ®' ^8rk TEXAS, OF THE OFFENSE OF AGGRAVATED ROBBERY IN.THE ABOVE REFERENCED TRIAL COURT NUMBER, THIS CAUSE WAS APPEALED TO THE ELEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AND WAS AFFIRMED ON OR ABOUT NOVEMBER 30, 2016. II. 

### PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND SUSPENSION OF TRAP 9.3 (b) (1) IS BASED ON THE FACT THAT HE IS PRESENTLY INCARCERATED IN THE TDCJ-CID AT THE ALLAN B. POLUNSKY UNIT IN LIVINGSTON, TEXAS 77351, AND IS PROCEEDING PRO-SE AND 

### REQUIRES ADDITIONAL TIME TO RESEARCH AND THE POLUNSKY UNIT DOES NOT PROVIDE ACCESS TO A COPY MACHINE AND THIS BECOMES A BURDEN ON PETITIONER. WHEREFORE PREMISES CONSIDERED PETITIONER PRAYS THAT THIS MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ALONG WITH HIS REQUEST TO SUSPEND TRAP 9.3 (b) (1) BE GRANTED. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, 

# cc. file CM/Jr(Zha/bto

, , OSIEL ALVAREZ pf"
' POLUNSKY UNIT- TDCJ-CID NO. 01967111 3872 F.M. 350 SOUTH LIVINGSTON, TEXAS 77351 

# Sgmttasbeenser**0dtslricl att*»f\n tcWto*ty.Tttas.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of FFD Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Trent B. Troyer, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/Trent B. Troyer
-----------------------------
Trent B. Troyer
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2006
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. E DU AR DO MUNO Z - ME DINA , D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 11- 10517 D . C . N o . 2 : 1 1 - c r - 0 1 2 7 7 - G MS ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona G . M urr a yS now , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r10, 2012 ** B e f o r e : W A R D L A W , C L I F T O N , an dN .R . S M I T H , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . E dua r do M unoz - M e di naappe a l s f r om hi s gui l ty - pl e ac onvi c t i on and 2 2 - m o n th s e n te n c e f

o rr e e n tryo f

ar e m o v e da lie n , in v io la tio n o f 8 U .S .C . § 1 3 2 6 . P ur s ua ntt o A n de rs v . Ca lifo rn ia , 38 6 U . S . 73 8 (19 67 ), M un oz-M edi na’ s c ou nsel h a s f ile dab r ie f

s ta tin g th e r e a r e n o g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f , a lo n g w ith am o tio n to



# FI LED SEP 19 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 10517 2 w i thdr a w a s c ouns e l of

r e c or d. W e ha ve pr ovi de d M unoz - M e di naw i th the opportuni tyt o f

i l e apr o s e s uppl e m e nt a lbr i e f . N o pr o s e s uppl e m e nt a l br i e f or a ns w e r i ng br i e f

ha s be e n f

i l e d. O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the r e c or d pur s uantt o P e n s o n v . O h io , 4 8 8 U . S. 7 5 , 8 0 ( 1 9 8 8 ) , d is c lo s e s n o a r g u ab le g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f o n d ir e c t ap p e a l. C o u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s GR AN T E D. AF F I RME D.