alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 63

To express the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Agriculture should

dispose of all remaining commodities in the disaster reserve maintained

under the Agricultural Act of 1970 to relieve the distress of livestock

producers whose ability to maintain livestock is adversely affected by

the prolonged drought conditions existing in certain areas of the United

States, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 24, 1996

Mrs. KASSEBAUM submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To express the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Agriculture should dispose of all remaining commodities in

the disaster reserve maintained under the Agricultural

Act of 1970 to relieve the distress of livestock producers

whose ability to maintain livestock is adversely affected

by the prolonged drought conditions existing in certain

areas of the United States, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring),
2

•SCON 63 IS

1 SECTION 1. USE OF DISASTER RESERVE FOR ASSISTANCE

2 TO LIVESTOCK PRODUCERS.

3 In light of the prolonged drought conditions existing

4 in certain areas of the United States, the Secretary of Ag5 riculture should promptly dispose of all commodities in the

6 disaster reserve maintained under section 813 of the Agri7 cultural Act of 1970 (7 U.S.C. 1427a) to relieve the dis8 tress of livestock producers whose ability to maintain live9 stock is adversely affected by the prolonged drought.

Æ
----

(2004/C 88 E/0151)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3399/03

by Olle Schmidt (ELDR) to the Commission

(17 November 2003)

Subject:   Azerbaijan

Presidential elections were recently held in Azerbaijan, which were followed by riots and political unrest. The new president, Ilham Aliyev, son of the former president, has already cracked down hard on any form of opposition. Azerbaijan is a country beset by a great many problems; large numbers of refugees, a ravaged environment and conflicts with its neighbours. At the same time, there are great riches to be exploited in the form of oil, which attracts interest in the region from many quarters, including the USA and the European Union. However, this economic interest must not lead us to turn a blind eye to the mismanagement of the country. Azerbaijan is in great need of reform and reconstruction, which is entirely possible with the anticipated revenue from oil. However, current events indicate that the country is more likely to become the fiefdom of the Aliyev clan, where progress towards democracy and improving living conditions do not come top of the agenda.

Will the Commission therefore say what steps are being taken to ensure that advances are made towards democracy in Azerbaijan at the same time as economic cooperation progresses? Has the EU attached any conditions to investment etc., such as linkage to progress on democracy, human rights, the situation of refugees and using the country's oil revenue for the good of the people as a whole?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(17 December 2003)

The Commission has been assisting Azerbaijan make the transition to a democratic society based on a free market economy since 1992 with its technical assistance and other aid programmes. Currently these assistance programmes have poverty reduction and government reform as their principal objectives. The Government of Azerbaijan has recently started to implement its State Programme for Poverty Reduction and Economic Development (SPRED). The Programme has been welcomed by the International Financing Institutions and the wider donor community. The Spred provides the framework for all donor assistance in Azerbaijan. Only by addressing the fundamental and underlying problems will the progress to democracy and a free market economy be achieved.

The Commission along with the Member States carries out a very active dialogue on a wide range of matters including progress on democracy, human rights and the use of oil revenues for the good of the people as a whole. The Commission is one of the largest donors assisting Azerbaijan's refugees and Internally Displaced People through its programme for the rehabilitation of war damaged areas.

The Government of Azerbaijan has started to use its Oil Fund for the benefit of refugees who have been settled in different regions of Azerbaijan.

----
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 30

A resolution making majority party appointments to certain Standing

Committees for the One Hundred Fourth Congress.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 5, 1995

Mr. GRASSLEY (for Mr. DOLE) submitted the following resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

A resolution making majority party appointments to certain

Standing Committees for the One Hundred Fourth Congress.

1 Resolved, That the following shall constitute the ma2 jority party’s membership on the following standing com3 mittees for the One Hundred Fourth Congress, or until

4 their successors are chosen:

5 COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES:

6 Mr. Murkowski, Mr. Hatfield, Mr. Domenici, Mr. Nickles,

7 Mr. Craig, Mr. Thomas, Mr. Kyl, Mr. Grams, Mr. Jef8 fords, and Mr. Burns.

9 COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS:

10 Mr. Chafee, Mr. Warner, Mr. Smith, Mr. Faircloth, Mr.
2

SRES 30 ATS

1 Kempthorne, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Thomas, Mr. McConnell,

2 and Mr. Bond.

3 COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS: Mr. Helms,

4 Mr. Lugar, Mrs. Kassebaum, Mr. Brown, Mr. Coverdell,

5 Ms. Snowe, Mr. Thompson, Mr. Thomas, Mr. Grams, and

6 Mr. Ashcroft.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 320 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 320

             Authorizing the printing of a Senate document.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 3, 1996

 Mr. Lott (for Mr. Hatfield) submitted the following resolution; which 
                      was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
             Authorizing the printing of a Senate document.

    Resolved, That there be printed with illustrations as a Senate 
document a compilation of materials entitled ``Committee on 
Appropriations, United States Senate, 129th Anniversary, 1867-1996'', 
and that there be printed two thousand additional copies of such 
document for the use of the Committee on Appropriations.
                                 <all>
```
# ZIAI

STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS 

### ABRAHAM HOPKINS NO. 

### 2024 KW 0150


### MARCH 22, 2024

In Re: Abraham Hopkins, 

### applying for 

### supervisory writs, 19th



### Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 

### 01-11-0101.
BEFORE: 

### MCCLENDON, HESTER, 

### AND MILLER, JJ.

WRIT DENIED ON THE 

### SHOWING MADE. Relator 

### failed to 

### include: 

## the application forpostconviction relief, the district court' s 

### ruling 

## denying the application 

### for postconviction relief, pertinent 

### district court minutes, and the State' s answer, if any, the commissioner' s report, and any other portions of the 

### district court record that might support the claims raised 

### in the writ application. 

### Supplementation of this writ

# applicationand/oranapplicationforrehearingwillnotbe considered. See Uniform 

### Rules of 

### Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 

### 2- 18. 7 & 4- 

### 9. 

### In the event relator elects to 

### file a new application with this court, 

## he may do so without 

## the necessity of 

### obtaining a return 

### date. 

### Any future 

## filing on this 

### issue should 

### include the entire contents of this application, the 

### missing items noted above, 

## and a copy ofthis ruling. PMC CHH SMM



### OURT OFAPPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

Y CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT
Dated:  March 29, 2007                                                                            In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:By: /s/  /s/ E. Todd Whittemore                                                                  Title:Executive Vice President, Master ServicingAurora Loan Services LLC,   as Master ServicerI, E. Todd Whittemore, certify that:1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of  Structured Adjustable Rate Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2006-11 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.E. Todd Whittemore**Exhibit 31 : Sarbanes-Oxley Certification**Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, as ServicerDeutsche Bank National Trust Company, as CustodianFirst American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P., as Sub-Contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLCLaSalle Bank National Association, as CustodianNewport Management Corporation, as Sub-Contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLCU.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Paying Agent and CustodianWells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian
Exhibit 32.2






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) by China Growth Corporation (the “Company”), I,  Patrick S.H. Chan, the Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:




1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and




2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






China Growth CorporationDate: April 15, 2011
By:
/s/ Patrick S.H. ChanPatrick S.H. ChanInterim Chief Financial Officer and

Interim Principal Accounting Officer


This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished upon request.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20

- 578

_____________________________
K

WAMIN H ASSAN T HOMAS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. Mark W. Moseley , Judge

. September 29, 2020

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
M AKAR , O STERHAUS and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Kwamin Hassan Thomas, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT 10.2

DEPOSIT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Between Holloman Minerals Pty. Ltd. and

Strongbow Resources Inc.





WHEREAS, in connection with that Term Sheet Agreement by and between Strongbow Resources Inc., formerly Plush Mall Inc. (SRI), and Holloman Minerals Pty. Ltd. (HML) dated November 28, 2007, and subsequently extended by amendment (the Agreement),  SRI paid to HML a good faith deposit (the Deposit) in the amount of USD$300,000, and;



WHEREAS, SRI and HML have mutually agreed not to pursue creation of the exploration joint venture contemplated in the Agreement, and;



WHEREAS, SRI and HML recognize the expenditures incurred by both parties to the Agreement and jointly desire to amicably unwind all commitments related to the Agreement and cause a settlement and return of the Deposit,



NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is herewith acknowledged, SRI and HML hereby agree as follows:



HML has agreed to pay, and SRI has agreed to accept, USD$275,000as full and final settlement and return of the Deposit paid in connection with the Agreement. Such settlement and repayment to be effective this 29th day of May, 2009. Each party releases the other from any and all claims with respect to the Agreement.



|                        |                        
|----------------------- | -----------------------
|                        |                        
|STRONGBOW RESOURCES INC
|                        |                        
|By:                     | /s/ HERBERT SCHMIDT    
|                        | Herbert Schmidt,       
|                        | Chief Financial Officer



|                            |                   
|--------------------------- | ------------------
|                            |                   
|HOLLOMAN MINERALS PTY. LTD.
|                            |                   
|By:                         | /s/ MARK STEVENSON
|                            | Mark Stevenson,   
|                            | Director
#### Vincent U. SOLOMON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BARAJAS; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 14-17041, No. 14-17188

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted November 15, 2017 *

Filed November 22, 2017

*696Vincent U. Solomon, Pro Se

Diana Esquivel, Deputy Attorney General, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants-Appellees Barajas, Campbell, Franco, J. Lundy, Medrano, Norgaard, K. Prior, Hazelton, Vasquez, Wright

Susan Eileen Coleman, Esquire, Senior Litigation Attorney, Kristina Doan Gruen-berg, Esquire, Attorney, Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellee H. Tate

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes these cases are suitable for decision without oral argument, *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Vincent U. Solomon appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various constitutional claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Toguchi v. Chung,*391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Solomon’s deliberate indifference claim against defendant Dr. Tate because Solomon failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether Dr. Tate was deliberately indifferent in treating Solomon’s pain. *See id.*at 1058-60 (a prison official is deliberately indifferent only if he or she knows of and disregards an excessive risk to an inmate’s health; medical malpractice, negligence, or a difference of opinion concerning the course of treatment does not amount to deliberate indifference); *McGuckin v. Smith,*974 F.2d 1050, 1060 (9th Cir. 1992) (“A defendant must purposefully ignore or fail to respond to a prisoner’s pain or possible medical need in order for deliberate indifference to be established.”), *overruled on other grounds by WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller,*104 F.3d 1133 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Solomon’s motion to appoint counsel because Solomon did not demonstrate exceptional circumstances. *See Palmer v. Valdez,*560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009) (setting forth standard of review and “exceptional circumstances” requirement for appointment of counsel).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

We do not consider documents not presented to the district court because they are not part of the record on appeal. *United States v. Elias,*921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LORAL SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS LTD. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         490,702
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  424,830
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,429
<INVENTORY>                                    117,308
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,233,706
<PP&E>                                       2,240,134
<DEPRECIATION>                                (366,186)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,544,765
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          351,037
<BONDS>                                      1,897,342
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,053,831
<COMMON>                                         2,956
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,976,204
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,544,765
<SALES>                                        318,086
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               318,086
<CGS>                                          269,803
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  324,065
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,316
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,899)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,262
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (123,030)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (142,387)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.49)


</TABLE>
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION

Cause Number: 01

- 12

- 00688

- CR

Trial Court Cause

Number: 1348372

Style: Raul Rodriguez

v The State of Texas

Date motion filed * : April 5, 2013

Type of motion: Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellate Brief

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Appellant's brief

Is appeal accelerated? Yes No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: February 6, 2013

Number of previous extensions granted: 1

– 60 days

Date Requested: June 7, 2013

Ordered that motion is:

Granted

If document is to be filed, document due:

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time.

Denied

Dismi ssed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

Other:

Judge's signature: /s/ Justice Rebeca Huddle

Acting individually Acting f or the Court

Panel consists of

Date: April 8, 2013
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6707 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6707

   To repeal the requirements of the Foreign Dredge Act of 1906 with 
               respect to dredging and dredged material.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 11, 2023

  Mr. Moylan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To repeal the requirements of the Foreign Dredge Act of 1906 with 
               respect to dredging and dredged material.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Port Modernization and Supply Chain 
Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. DREDGING; DREDGED MATERIAL.

    (a) Repeal.--
            (1) In general.--Section 55109 of title 46, United States 
        Code, is repealed.
            (2) Conforming amendment.--The analysis for chapter 551 of 
        title 46, United States Code, is amended by striking the item 
        relating to section 55109.
    (b) Excluding Dredged Material From Transportation Requirements.--
            (1) In general.--Section 55110 of title 46, United States 
        Code, is amended--
                    (A) in the section heading, by striking ``or 
                dredged material''; and
                    (B) by striking ``or dredged material''.
            (2) Conforming amendment.--The analysis for chapter 551 of 
        title 46, United States Code, is amended by striking the item 
        relating to section 55110 and inserting the following:

``Sec. 55110. Transportation of valueless material.''.
                                 <all>
```