alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21 - 0272

_________________ COREY ALAN RUBIN and DON HAUTH,

Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. BRENT E. HUGHES and GRACE HUGHES, husband and wife,

Defendants and Appellants. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the Honorable Heidi Ulbricht , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 16 2022

02/16/2022
Case Number: DA 21-0272
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-81,606-01
IN RE MILTON SE YMORE, JR., Re lator
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 1053259 IN THE 208T H DISTRICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R
Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamu s p u rsuant to the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. I n it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in the 208th District Court of Har ri s C o u n t y , t h at more than 35 day s have elapse d, and that the application has not y et bee n forwa rded to this Court. I n these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. Respondent, the District Clerk of Har ris County , is or dere d to f

ile a response , which may be made by submitt ing the rec ord on such habea s corpus application, submitt ing a copy of a timely filed order which desig nates issues to be investigated ( see McCree v. Hampton , 824 S.W .2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that2

Relator has not filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in Har ri s County
. Should the response include an order desig nating issues, proof of the date the district attorne y ’s o ff i ce was
serve d with the habea s application shall also be submitted with the response. T his application for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abey ance until Respondent has su b m i t t ed the appropr iate re sponse. Such re sponse shall be submitted within 30 day s of the date of this order.

Filed: Jul y

9, 2014 Do not publish
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 17-1658

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Kenneth R. McGee

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________

 Submitted: October 2, 2017

Filed: October 5, 2017

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth McGee directly appeals his sentence after pleading guilty to a firearm

offense pursuant to a plea agreement that contained an appeal waiver. His counsel

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the district court erred in applying an enhancement

1

under the Guidelines. 

Upon careful review, we conclude that the waiver is valid, applicable, and

enforceable. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo

review of validity and applicability of appeal waiver); United States v. Andis, 333

F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (appeal waiver will be enforced if the

appeal falls within the scope of a waiver, if defendant knowingly and voluntarily

entered into the plea agreement and waiver, and if enforcing the waiver would not

result in a miscarriage of justice). Having independently reviewed the record

pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues other

than the scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal and grant

counsel leave to withdraw.

______________________________

The Honorable Beth Phillips, United States District Judge for the Western 1

District of Missouri.

-2-
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David A. Baldwin,  President of CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc.
(the "Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly  period
     ended   September  30,  2003  (the   "Report")   fully  complies  with  the
     requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
     1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date:  November 7, 2003



                              /s/ David A. Baldwin
                            -------------------------
                                David A. Baldwin
                                    President
                            (chief executive officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 222 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

  2d Session
S. RES. 222

To authorize the production of documents by the Permanent Subcommittee 
                           on Investigations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 1, 1996

    Mr. Dole (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To authorize the production of documents by the Permanent Subcommittee 
                           on Investigations.

Whereas the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on 
        Governmental Affairs conducted an investigation into allegations 
        concerning the Department of Justice's handling of a computer software 
        contract with INSLAW, Inc.;
Whereas in the case of INSLAW, Inc., et al. v. United States of America, Cong. 
        Ref. No. 95-338X, pending in the United States Court of Federal Claims, 
        counsel for the plaintiffs have requested that the Permanent 
        Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on Governmental Affairs 
        provide copies of records from its investigation;
Whereas by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be 
        taken from such control or possession but by permission of the Senate;
Whereas when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take 
        such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on 
Governmental Affairs, acting jointly, are authorized to provide records 
to all parties in the case of INSLAW, Inc., et al. v. United States of 
America, except concerning matters for which a privilege should be 
asserted.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
                                -----------------

                                    FORM 10-Q/A
                QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                                -----------------

         FOR THE QUARTER ENDED                       COMMISSION FILE NUMBER
           SEPTEMBER 30, 1996                               0-27826
                                -----------------

                             PARTY CITY CORPORATION
             (EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

                   DELAWARE                              22--3033692
        (State or other jurisdiction of                (I.R.S. Employer
        incorporation or organization)                Identification No.)

               400 COMMONS WAY                               07866
            ROCKAWAY, NEW JERSEY                           (ZIP CODE)

                                  201-983-0888
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

                                -----------------


         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
                                     Yes  X     No  
                                         ----      ----

         Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's
classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date:


         As of November 11, 1996, there were outstanding 6,944,000 shares of
Common Stock, $.01 par value.
<PAGE>   2

                                    SIGNATURE

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
Undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


                                       PARTY CITY CORPORATION



                                  By        /s/ DAVID LAUBER
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                           (David Lauber)
                                           Duly Authorized Officer &
                                           Chief Financial &
                                           Principal Accounting Officer



Date: March 6, 1997
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6535 

To require the President to obtain written approval from the Secretary of 

Defense and the Secretary of State prior to the use of nuclear weapons 

by the United States, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 27, 2016 

Mr. GRAYSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed 

Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To require the President to obtain written approval from 

the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State 

prior to the use of nuclear weapons by the United States, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nuclear Sanity Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. NUCLEAR WEAPON USE APPROVAL PROCESS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Except in a case of a physical at7 tack on the territory of the United States by the military 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6535 IH

1 force of a foreign government, or in a case in which it 

2 is impossible for the President to establish communica3 tions with the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of 

4 State for a 24-hour period, the President shall obtain the 

5 approval of the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary 

6 of State prior to the use of nuclear weapons by the United 

7 States. 

8 (b) FORM OF APPROVAL.—The approval under this 

9 section shall be in writing unless the approving official 

10 deems approval in writing impracticable, in which case it 

11 may be oral. Written approval under this section may be 

12 transmitted to the President by electronic means. 

13 (c) VIOLATIONS.— 

14 (1) The United States military shall disregard 

15 all orders from the President in violation of this sec16 tion. 

17 (2) Any violation or attempted violation of this 

18 section shall be deemed a ‘‘high crime or mis19 demeanor’’ under the United States Constitution. 

20 (d) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘territory 

21 of the United States’’ means the States, the District of 

22 Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the territories of the United 

23 States, whether or not incorporated or organized. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Official Journal C 8/12 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 8 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4812 January 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 8

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4812 January 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 008/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2005/C 008/2 | Notice of initiation of an accelerated review of Council Regulation (EC) No 2603/2000 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate originating, inter alia, in India | 2 |
| 2005/C 008/3 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3464 — Kesko/ICA/JV) (1) | 4 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 008/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2005/C 008/2

Notice of initiation of an accelerated review of Council Regulation (EC) No 2603/2000 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate originating, inter alia, in India

inter alia

2

2005/C 008/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3464 — Kesko/ICA/JV) (1)

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: __2011________-NM-____095______-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer


pursuant
to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350)




In
connection with the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008 (the “Report”) of Columbus Acquisition Corp.  (the “Registrant”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Andrew Intrater, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,
hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.




/s/ Andrew IntraterName:
      Andrew IntraterTitle:
      Chairman andChief Executive OfficerDate:
      February 23, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc's Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 1997 and is qualified entirely by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          23,003
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,704
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,719
<PP&E>                                          10,011
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,759
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 133,464
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,874
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           166
<OTHER-SE>                                      91,424
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   133,464
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,393
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,853
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,540
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,380
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,160
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,160
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Mario Humberto MEJIA-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40383 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 20, 2017

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Mario Humberto Mejia-Lopez, Pro Se

*263Before JONES, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mario Humberto Mejia-Lopez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mejia-Lopez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 52

To recognize and encourage the convening of a National Silver Haired

Congress.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 17, 1996

Ms. MIKULSKI (for herself, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. BOND, Mrs.

BOXER, Mr. BRADLEY, Mr. BUMPERS, Mr. BYRD, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr.

COHEN, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. DODD, Mr. DOLE, Mr. DORGAN,

Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. GLENN, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. HATFIELD, Mr. HELMS, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. INOUYE, Mr.

JEFFORDS, Mr. JOHNSTON, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. KERREY, Mr. LEVIN,

Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. PELL, Mr. PRESSLER, Mr.

PRYOR, Mr. REID, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. SIMON, Mr.

SIMPSON, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. THURMOND, Mr. WARNER, and Mr.

WELLSTONE) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To recognize and encourage the convening of a National

Silver Haired Congress.

Whereas many States have encouraged and facilitated the

creation of senior citizen legislative and advocacy bodies;

Whereas in creating such bodies such States have provided to

many older Americans the opportunity to express concerns, promote appropriate interests, and advance the

common good by influencing the legislation and actions

of State government; and
2

•SCON 52 IS

Whereas a National Silver Haired Congress, with representatives from each State, would provide a national forum for

a nonpartisan evaluation of grassroots solutions to concerns shared by an increasing number of older Americans: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That the Congress hereby recognizes and en3 courages the convening of an annual National Silver

4 Haired Congress in the District of Columbia.

Æ
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00315-CV

John Weston Roades

v.

Lisa Henderson, Individually and as Independent Administratrix of the Estate of Steven 

Paul Henderson, Kinsley Henderson, Koale Jaks, and Robert Popp

On Appeal from the

329th District Court of Wharton County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV51904

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

March 17, 2022
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 163

To require the Select Committee on Ethics of the Senate to hold hearings

in any case involving a Senator in which the committee determines

that there is substantial credible evidence which provides substantial

cause to conclude that a violation within the jurisdiction of the Select

Committee has occurred.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 11 (legislative day, JULY 10), 1995

Mrs. BOXER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Select Committee on Ethics

RESOLUTION

To require the Select Committee on Ethics of the Senate

to hold hearings in any case involving a Senator in

which the committee determines that there is substantial

credible evidence which provides substantial cause to conclude that a violation within the jurisdiction of the Select

Committee has occurred.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. ETHICS HEARINGS INVOLVING SERIOUS ETH3 ICS VIOLATIONS BY MEMBERS.

4 Section 2(d)(5) of Senate Resolution 338, agreed to

5 July 24, 1964, is amended by inserting after the first sen6 tence the following: ‘‘The Select Committee shall hold
2

•SRES 163 IS

1 hearings in any investigation conducted under subpara2 graph (A) that involves a complaint against a Member.

3 The hearing requirement may be waived by the Select

4 Committee by a recorded majority vote of the members

5 of the Select Committee.’’.

6 SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.

7 The amendment made by section 1 shall apply to any

8 investigation within the jurisdiction of the Select Commit9 tee on Ethics pending on the date of adoption of this reso10 lution and any investigation commenced after the date of

11 adoption.

Æ