alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. GULMARO TORRES-LEON, Defendant - Appellant. No. 12-35353 D.C. Nos. 1:09-cv-00111-RFC 1:07-cr-00086-RFC-1
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Richard F. Cebull, Senior District Judge, Presiding Submitted December 4, 2013 ** Seattle, Washington Before: O’CONNOR, Associ ate Justice (Ret.), *** and TALLMAN and BEA, Circuit Judges. 

# FILED
DEC 20 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Sandra Day O’Connor, A ssociate Justice (Ret.) for the Supreme Court of the United States, sitting by designation.Appellant Gulmaro Torres-Leon appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. For the following reasons, we affirm. 1. Montana trial counsel was not ineffective underStrickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984) and Hill v. Lockhart , 474 U.S. 52 (1985) in failing to pursue a Fifth Amendment double jeopardy defense. The district court correctly found that there was not e nough evidence of a single conspiracy to support a reasonable attorney in recomme nding trial over a guilty plea, especially with the risk of a longer prison sentence. Instead, the evidence showed at least two conspiracies, occurring at different times and in different places, and involving different persons, methods, roles, and acts. See Arnold v. United States , 336 F.2d 347 (9th Cir. 1964); United States v. Ziskin , 360 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2003). 2. Even if trial counsel had erred, Appellant would not meet his burden to prove a “reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s errors, he would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial.” Hill , 474 U.S. at 59. 3. The government did not violate Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 (1963) when it redacted information from i nvestigation documents. The redacted information did not raise a meritorious double jeopardy defense, and therefore was not sufficiently material or exculpatory to establish a Brady claim. 2AFFIRMED.

3
# Official Journal C 407/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 407 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 648 October 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 407

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 648 October 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 407/01 | Commission Decision of 29 July 2021 instructing the central administrator to enter changes to the national allocation tables of Bulgaria, Germany, Greece, France, Italy, Latvia, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal and Finland into the European Union Transaction Log | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 407/01

Commission Decision of 29 July 2021 instructing the central administrator to enter changes to the national allocation tables of Bulgaria, Germany, Greece, France, Italy, Latvia, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal and Finland into the European Union Transaction Log

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCETO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                            9183
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,534
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (407)
<INVENTORY>                                        150
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,882
<PP&E>                                          56,551
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,278
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  76,697
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,429
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            64
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,420
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    76,697
<SALES>                                         56,267
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,267
<CGS>                                           35,775
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,775
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (348)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 591
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   6230
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2504
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3725
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,725
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .57


</TABLE>
The Effects of Gasoline Sulfur Level 


on Emissions from Tier 2 Vehicles 


in the In-Use Fleet
 

Appendix C
 

Additional Information on
 

Emission Measurements
 

Assessment and Standards Division 

Office of Transportation and Air Quality 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

NOTICE 

This technical report does not necessarily represent final EPA decisions or 

positions. It is intended to present technical analysis of issues using data 

that are currently available. The purpose in the release of such reports is to 

facilitate the exchange of technical information and to inform the public of 

technical developments. 

EPA-420-D-13-003 

April 2013 
 

Appendix C. Additional Information on Emission Measurements 

Gaseous emissions (THC, CH4, NOx, CO) were measured using a Horiba MEXA 7200SLE 

analyzer system. The instrument manufacturer gives the measurement accuracy as ±1% of full 

scale or ±2% of the relevant calibration point(s). 

Particulate matter (PM) was collected by triplicate 47mm Teflon filters for each phase (bag) of 

the test cycle using a system compliant with 40 CFR Part 1065. The triplicate filter weights were 

averaged to form a composite result for each test phase. Filters were equilibrated overnight in a 

clean room environment before taking pre- and post-test weights. Weighing was done using a 

Mettler Toledo UMT2 microbalance. 

67
### PLACER COUNTY

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

PROPOSED AMENDED RULE 247, NATURAL GAS

- FIRED WATER HEATERS, SMALL BOILERS, AND PROCESS HEATERS

Placer County Air Pollution Control District proposes to adopt amended Rule 247 which

limit s the sale and installation of new natural gas

- fired water heaters, small boilers and process heaters in the range of 75,000 Btu /hr to 5 million B tu /hr to emissions of no more than 20 ppmv of NOx. This emission limit is effective on January 1, 2015. The amendment is to alter the marking requirements on the units.

On Thursday, February 13, 2014 , at their regular meeting beginning at 2:30 PM, the Placer County Air Pollution Control Distric t Board of Directors will hold a public hearing to receive comments and consider the adoption of the amended rule

. The hearing is to be held at the Placer County Board of Supervisors Chambers, 175 Fulweiler Avenue, Auburn, California.

All interested parties are advised of the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule s

. The proposed rule s and their support document s can be viewed at the District’s website

at www.placer.ca.gov/apcd

. Written comments should be addressed to Mr. John Finnell at the District office, located at 110 Maple Street, Auburn, CA 95603

. The District phone number is (530) 745

- 2330.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-10063

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTHONY ROBINSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:95-CR-236-2-D

- - - - - - - - - -

August 19, 1998

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Anthony Robinson has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED. Counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 231 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

  2d Session
S. RES. 231

            Extending sympathies to the people of Scotland.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 14 (legislative day, March 13), 1996

  Mr. Wellstone (for himself and Mr. Bradley) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
            Extending sympathies to the people of Scotland.

Whereas all Americans were horrified by the news this morning that 16 
        kindergarten children and their teacher were shot and killed yesterday 
        in Dunblane, Scotland, by an individual who invaded their school;
Whereas another 12 children and 3 adults were apparently wounded in the same 
        terrible assault;
Whereas this was an unspeakable tragedy of huge dimensions causing tremendous 
        feelings of horror and anger and sadness affecting all people around the 
        world; and
Whereas the people of the United States wish to extend their sympathy to the 
        people of Scotland in their hours of hurt and pain and grief: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate, on behalf of the American people, does 
extend its condolences and sympathies to the families of the little 
children and others who were murdered and wounded, and to all the 
people of Scotland, with fervent hopes and prayers that such an 
occurrence will never, ever again take place.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40937

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ADOLPHO GARCIA-BADILLO, also known as Guillermo Quintero-Valli

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:07-CR-222-1

Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Adolpho GarciaBadillo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Garcia-Badillo has not filed a

response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 20, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 68 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 

enhance the use of Juvenile Accountability Block Grants for programs 

to prevent and address occurrences of bullying and to reauthorize the 

Juvenile Accountability Block Grants program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2015 

Ms. JACKSON LEE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets 

Act of 1968 to enhance the use of Juvenile Accountability Block Grants for programs to prevent and address 

occurrences of bullying and to reauthorize the Juvenile 

Accountability Block Grants program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Juvenile Accountability 

5 Block Grant Reauthorization and the Bullying Prevention 

6 and Intervention Act of 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 68 IH

1 SEC. 2. BULLYING PREVENTION AND INTERVENTION PRO2 GRAMS; REAUTHORIZATION OF JUVENILE AC3 COUNTABILITY BLOCK GRANTS. 

4 (a) BULLYING PREVENTION AND INTERVENTION.— 

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (13) of section 

6 1801(b) of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 

7 Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796ee(b)) is 

8 amended to read as follows: 

9 ‘‘(13) establishing and maintaining account10 ability-based programs that are designed to enhance 

11 school safety, which programs may include research12 based bullying prevention, cyberbullying prevention, 

13 and gang prevention programs, as well as interven14 tion programs regarding bullying;’’. 

15 (2) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of 

16 the Congress that the use of best practices is en17 couraged for all activities for which grants under 

18 part R of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and 

19 Safe Streets Act of 1968 may be used. 

20 (b) REAUTHORIZATION OF JUVENILE ACCOUNT21 ABILITY BLOCK GRANTS.—Section 1810(a) of such Act 

22 (42 U.S.C. 3796ee–10(a)) is amended by inserting before 

23 the period at the end the following: ‘‘and such funds as 

24 may be necessary for each of fiscal years 2016 through 

25 2020’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with
the Annual Report of Loreto Resources Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Adam Zive, Interim Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that;



(1)	        	The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)		         The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|/s/ Adam Zive |                                
|------------- | -------------------------------
|Name:         | Adam Zive                      
|Title:        | Interim Chief Executive Officer
|              |                                



Date:	April 16, 2012
EXHIBIT 31 Certification of 
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Stetson Chung, President,
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Jomar Specialties, Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), certify that: 1.     I have reviewed this
annual report on Form 10-K of the Company; 2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.     The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5.     The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 28, 2008  /s/STETSON CHUNGStetson Chung
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M. 3703 — RABOBANK/IHC)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(2005/C 20/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(2)  Available on DG COMP website:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/legislation/consultation/simplified_tru.pdf.

----
#### IN RE: Joseph SCOTT, Petitioner

No. 17-1406

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. March 9, 2017

(Opinion filed: March 23, 2017)

Joseph Scótt, Pro Se

Shannon T. Hanson, Esq., Office of United States Attorney, Wilmington, DE, for Plaintiff-Respondent

Before: CHAGARES, VANASKIE and KRAUSE, Circuit Judges

OPINION *

PER CURIAM

Joseph Scott, a federal inmate currently incarcerated at FCI-Fairton, filed this mandamus petition on February 16, 2017, claiming that the District Court has failed to timely rule on his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Scott filed the § 3582(c) motion six months earlier. After Scott filed his mandamus petition, the District Court ordered the Government to respond to Scott’s § 3582(c)(2) motion by March 27, 2017, and permitted Scott time after that in which to file a reply.

In light of the above, we cannot conclude that the District Court’s delay in adjudicating Scott’s § 3582(c)(2) motion is “tantamount to a failure to exercise jurisdiction,” Madden v. Myers, 102 F.3d 74, 79 (3d Cir. 1996), such that mandamus relief may be appropriate. Accordingly, the mandamus petition is denied.1 This denial is without prejudice to Scott’s filing a new mandamus petition should the District Court fail to act on his § 3582(c)(2) motion within a reasonable time.

*

 This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.

1

. The petition is also denied to the extent Scott requests that we order his “immediate release” pending disposition of his § 3582(c)(2) motion. See Hollingsworth v. Perry, 558 U.S. 183, 190, 130 S.Ct. 705, 175 L.Ed.2d 657 (2010) (per curiam) (explaining that a mandamus petitioner must show, inter alia, that "no other adequate means [exist] to attain the relief he desires”); cf. Fed. R. App. P. 9(b); Landano v. Rafferty, 970 F.2d 1230, 1239 (3d Cir. 1992).