alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 186A/18 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 186A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5718 June 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 186A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5718 June 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 186A/01 | Publication of a vacancy notice for an Executive Director Position of the IMI Joint Undertaking, in Brussels — (Temporary Agent — Grade AD 14) — COM/2014/10357 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2014/C 186A/01

Publication of a vacancy notice for an Executive Director Position of the IMI Joint Undertaking, in Brussels — (Temporary Agent — Grade AD 14) — COM/2014/10357

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2014/C 186A/02 | Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals | 7 |

2014/C 186A/02

Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals

7

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Janine Padron, Appellant
No. 06

- 18

- 00087

- CV v.
Catholic Diocese of Austin a/k/a Roman Catholic Diocese of Austin; Its Agents, Servants, and Employees; and St. Ignatius The Martyr Middle Sc hool, Appellee Appeal from the 250th District Court of Travis County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. D

- 1

- GN

16

- 004298 ). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Burgess and Justice Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We further order that the appellant, Janine Padron, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED APRIL 10, 2019 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Exhibit 11

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                              For the Three Months Ended
                                                                       October 31
                                                                       ----------
                                                                2000                1999
                                                          ------------------  ----------------
<S>                                                           <C>                <C>
Shares outstanding                                            6,077,068          4,552,242
                                                             -----------       ------------

Weighted average shares outstanding                           6,007,158          4,451,372
Stock Options                                                 1,412,675          1,452,500
Warrants                                                      1,797,500          1,798,125
                                                             -----------        -----------
   Total weighted average shares outstanding                  9,217,333          7,701,997
                                                             ===========        ===========

Net income (loss) before cumulative
   change in accounting principle                           $  (439,556)        $   80,925

Cumulative effect of change
   in accounting principle                                            -             79,896
                                                            ------------        -----------

Net income (loss)                                           $  (439,556)        $  160,821
                                                            ============        ===========

Basic Net Earnings (Loss) per share
   Net income  (loss) per common share
     before change in accounting principle                  $     (0.07)        $     0.02
   Cumulative effect of change
     in accounting principle                                          -               0.02
                                                            ------------        -----------
   Net income (loss) per common share                       $     (0.07)        $     0.04
                                                            ============        ==========

Diluted Net Earnings (Loss) per share
   Net income (loss) per common share before change         $     (0.07)        $     0.01
       in accounting principal
   Cumulative effect of change
       in accounting principle                                        -               0.01
                                                            ============        ==========
     Net income (loss) per common share                     $     (0.07)        $     0.02
                                                            ============        ==========
</TABLE>


<PAGE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Homeland Security Capital Corporation
      (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed
      with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below,
      hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
      knowledge:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:
                May 15, 2007
            By:
            /s/
              C.
              Thomas McMillenName:
                C. Thomas McMillen
              Title:
                Chief Executive Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Homeland Security Capital Corporation
      and
      will be retained by Homeland Security Capital Corporation and furnished to
      the
      United States Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon
      request.
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of LoralSpace & Communications Ltd. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Richard J. Townsend,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Richard J. Townsend           Richard J. Townsend *Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer*November 9, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 119 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 119

To authorize testimony by Senate employee and representation by Senate 
                             Legal Counsel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                  May 9 (legislative day, May 1), 1995

    Mr. Dole (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To authorize testimony by Senate employee and representation by Senate 
                             Legal Counsel.
Whereas, in the case of United States v. George C. Matthews, Case No. 95-CR-11, 
        pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 
        Wisconsin, a subpoena for testimony has been issued to Darin Schroeder, 
        an employee of the Senate on the staff of Senator Feingold;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial process, be taken from 
        such control or possession but by permission of the Senate;
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistently with 
        the privileges of the Senate; and
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(2) (1994), the 
        Senate may direct its counsel to represent committees, Members, officers 
        and employees of the Senate with respect to subpoenas or orders issued 
        to them in their official capacity: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Darin Schroeder and any other employees in Senator 
Feingold's office from whom testimony may be necessary are authorized 
to testify and to produce records in the case of United States v. 
George C. Matthews, except concerning matters for which a privilege 
should be asserted.
    Sec. 2. That the Senate Legal Counsel is directed to represent 
Darin Schroeder and any other employee in connection with the testimony 
authorized under section 1.
                                 <all>
```
----

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 19 October 2004

in Case C-425/03: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Milazzo in Provvidenza Regio v AXA Assicurazioni SpA (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Inadmissibility)

(2005/C 69/07)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-425/03: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Giudice di pace di Milazzo (Italy), made by decision of 18 April 2003, received at the Court on 6 October 2003, in the proceedings between Provvidenza Regio and AXA Assicurazioni SpA the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts (Rapporteur), President of Chamber, N. Colneric and J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, made an order on 19 October 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

The reference for a preliminary ruling made by the Giudice di pace di Milazzo, by decision of 18 April 2003, is manifestly inadmissible.

----

(1)OJ C 289, 29.11.2003.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             108
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        374
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   539
<PP&E>                                             272
<DEPRECIATION>                                     154
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     803
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,434
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              494
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,018)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       803
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                              685
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      685
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,672
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 838
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,200)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,200)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      35
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,165)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.45)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

In connection with the annual report of Strongbow Resources Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Herbert Schmidt, the Principal Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                    |  |                                          
|------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|Date:  May 28, 2010 |  | STRONGBOW RESOURCES INC                  
|                    |  |                                          
|                    |  |                                          
|                    |  | /s/ HERBERTSCHMIDT                       
|                    |  | Herbert Schmidt,                         
|                    |  | Principal Executive and Financial Officer
**Exhibit
      99.4**








CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-KSB of Vista
      Dorada Corp. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Donn P. T. Lee,
      Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








February
      5, 2008


DONN
      P. T. LEE


Donn
      P.
      T. Lee


Chief
      Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director








-1-
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3

                            AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
                           1998 STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
                        OF PATINA OIL & GAS CORPORATION

     THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 to the 1998 Stock Purchase Plan of Patina Oil & Gas
Corporation (this "Amendment"), dated as of May 28, 1999, is entered into by
Patina Oil & Gas Corporation, pursuant to authority granted to it in Article X
of the 1998 Stock Purchase Plan of Patina Oil & Gas Corporation, dated as of
February 19, 1998 (the "Stock Purchase Plan").

     WHEREAS, Article X of the Stock Purchase Plan provides that the Board of
Directors may, insofar as permitted by law, modify or amend the Stock Purchase
Plan in any respect whatsoever; provided, however, that any amendment that would
materially increase the cost of the Stock Purchase Plan to the Company must be
approved by the stockholders of the Company; and

     WHEREAS, in April 1999 the Board of Directors approved a proposed amendment
to the Stock Purchase Plan to amend Article IV to allow for the annual renewal
of 500,000 shares of Common Stock to be reserved for possible purchase under the
Stock Purchase Plan (the "Proposed Amendment"); and

     WHEREAS, on May 27, 1999, holders of a majority of the outstanding shares
of voting stock of all classes of the Corporation approved the Proposed
Amendment;

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Stock Purchase Plan is hereby amended as follows:

     1.  Amendment Relating to Shares. Article IV of the Stock Purchase Plan is
hereby amended by replacing the Paragraph in Article IV with the following:

     "There shall be 500,000 shares of Common Stock reserved under the Plan,
     subject to adjustment in accordance with Article IX hereof. The 500,000
     shares of Common Stock reserved for purchase under the Plan will be
     automatically renewed each Plan Year, with the cancellation of any
     remaining unpurchased shares from the previous Plan Year. The shares of
     Common Stock subject to the Plan shall be shares of authorized but unissued
     Common Stock."

     2.  Capitalized Terms. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein are
used as defined in the Stock Purchase Plan.  This Amendment will be governed by
and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed as of the date first
written above.


                              PATINA OIL & GAS CORPORATION


                              By: /s/ David J. Kornder
                                  ------------------------------------
                                      David J. Kornder
                                      Secretary
AAM

- 13

- 066

- E December 6, 2012

Exemption No. 10219 A

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2011

- 0147

Mr. Garren Sizer

Epic Helicopters, LLC

4201 North Main Street, Suite 109

Fort Worth, TX 76106

Dear M r. Sizer :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption

No. 10219. It explains the basis for our decision , describes its effect, and lists the conditions

and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated November 9, 2012 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA)

on behalf of Epic Helicopters, LLC ( Epic Helicopters ) for an extension of Exemption

No. 10219 . That exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)

allows Epic Helicopters, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its

safety

- sensitive employees under one testing program

.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons

relative to publ ic interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register beca use the requested extension of the exemption would not s et a

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Epic Helicopters

.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10219

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in th e public interest. Therefore, under the2

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has

delegat ed to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations.

Conditions and Limitations

1. E mployees of Epic Helicopters are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at

all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of

the Epic Helicopters part 135 operation, n ot under part 91.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 10219 to March 31, 2015, unless

so oner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

James R. Fraser, M.D.

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon
#### Maurice HUNT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Andre MATEVOUSIAN; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-15504

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*567Submitted November 15, 2017 *

Filed November 20, 2017

Maurice Hunt, Pro Se

Alyson Anne Berg, Attorney,. DOJ-USAO, Fresno, CA, Bureau of Prisons Regional Counsel, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Stockton, CA, Litigation Coordinator, USP — Atwater, Atwater, CA, for Defendants-Appellees

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Federal prisoner Maurice Hunt appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action brought under *Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics,*403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. *Resnick v. Hayes,*213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Hunt’s action because Hunt failed to allege facts sufficient to show that defendants were deliberately indifferent to his back and hip injury. *See Toguchi v. Chung,*391 F.3d 1051, 1057, 1060 (9th Cir. 2004) (a prison official is deliberately indifferent only if he or she knows of and disregards an excessive risk to an inmate’s health; mere negligence is insufficient to establish deliberate indifference); *see also Farmer v. Brennan,*511 U.S. 825, 847, 114 S.Ct. 1970, 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994) (Eighth Amendment claim for denial of humane conditions of confinement requires showing that prison official “knows that inmates face a substantial risk of serious harm and disregards that risk by failing to take reasonable measures to abate it.”).

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.