alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

> 

I, Ben Yan, certify that;

(1)         I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-KSB/A (Amendment No. 1) for the year ended December 31, 2007 of Sino Fibre Communications, Inc.;

(2)         Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)         The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)         designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)         evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)         disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)         The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)         all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)         any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  

Date:  April 22, 2008

/s/ Ben Yan

Ben Yan
Standby Commitment Agreement Amendment No. 19


EXHIBIT 10.1




Joseph V. Vittoria

1616 South Ocean Boulevard

Palm Beach, FL 33480

(T) 561 659 0860 (F) 561 659 1045










Puradyn Filter Technologies, Inc.

2017 High Ridge Road

Boynton Beach, FL 33426

Attention: Alan J. Sandler, VP/CAO, Principal Financial Officer




November 16, 2017




RE:

Standby Commitment Agreement Amendment #19




Dear Mr. Sandler:




Pursuant to the Standby Commitment Agreement letters dated March 28, 2002, and March 14, 2003 and all Amendments thereto, I, Joseph Vittoria (the “Lending Party”), agree to extend the payback dates from December 31, 2017 to December 31, 2018.




All other terms defined in the original Standby Commitment Agreement letters and the Amendments thereto, not otherwise in conflict with this Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed and delivered by the respective officers hereunto duly authorized on the date first written above.










/s/ Joseph V. Vittoria

Joseph V. Vittoria













Accepted and Agreed:

Puradyn Filter Technologies, Inc.










By:

/s/ Alan J. Sandler

Alan J. Sandler, Vice President, 

Chief Administration Officer, Principal Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Luis Saul GARCIA-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40550 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 20, 2017

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Luis Saul Garcia-Martinez, Pro Se

Before JONES, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Luis Saul Garcia-Martinez *267has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia-Martinez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with' counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *267published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 10.46

April 12, 2002

Mr. Edward Kidston
President
Kidston Communications
Pioneer, OH

Dear Ed,

Per this letter agreement, we are offering to you and you are accepting the
following new payment terms for all DigiKnow and other education industry
purchases:

All purchases will be paid for in full upon order, less a fifteen (15) percent
interest carrying charge.

We will create a bill of lading for each project which includes the serial
number of all significant components, and this list will segregate, for
accounting and management purposes, each order.

You receive title to the equipment upon payment.

We will store it here in our factory at no charge to you while we do
integration, testing and content loading. Upon completion of system integration
and loading, it will be stored as a group either at our factory, or at a storage
location approved by you.

Terms will remain FOB Knoxville, TN.

All other terms of our previous Agreement remain in effect.

Please indicate your acceptance of these terms by signing and dating below.

Best regards,                             Accepted this _____ day of April, 2002



Kenneth D. Van Meter                      ________________________________
President and CEO                         President, Kidston Communications
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 4, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51163

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MAURILIO CRUZ-MORENO, also known as Juan Ruelas-Garcia,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 3:06-CR-570-ALL

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit

Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Maurilio CruzMoreno raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate

criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance

is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Treasury United States Mint
 AGENCY: United States Mint, Department of the Treasury.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: The United States Mint is announcing pricing for the following new United States Mint numismatic product in accordance with the table below:
                        ( print page 14100) SKU
Product
Price22RC
2022 Limited Edition Silver Proof SetTM
$201.00
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne Janeski, Marketing Specialist, Sales and Marketing 202-306-9666; United States Mint; 801 9th Street NW; Washington, DC 20220. (Authority: 31 U.S.C. 5111, 5112, 5132, & 9701) Eric Anderson, Executive Secretary, United States Mint.


[FR Doc. 2022-05181 Filed 3-10-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 2, 2019

s0325

Order 

Clerk

April 2, 2019

158411

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 158411

COA: 343839

Kent CC: 14-000789-FC

DANYELL DARSHIEK THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 9, 2018 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
#### Timothy O’DELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Marvin PLUMLEY, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-6975

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 21, 2017

Decided: January 11, 2018

Timothy O’Dell, Appellant Pro Se. Robert L. Hogan, Scott E. Johnson, David A. Stackpole, Laura Young, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Timothy O’Dell seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of 'the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the *140merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that O’Dell has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny O’Dell’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
#### Martin WERNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald J. TRUMP, U.S. President; Elisabeth Devos, U.S. Education Secretary; Rex Tillerson, U.S. Secretary of State; James Risch, U.S. Senator; Mark R. Warner, U.S. Senator; Elizabeth Warren, U.S. Senator; Richard Blumenthal, U.S. Senator; U.S. Executive Branch; U. S. Legislature, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-2024

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 16, 2017

Decided: November 20, 2017

Martin Werner, Appellant Pro Se.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Martin Werner appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Werner v. Trump,*No. 2:17-cv-00396-RGD-RJK (E.D. Va. filed July 31, 2017 & entered Aug. 1, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 146

Designating the week beginning November 19, 1995, and the week beginning

on November 24, 1996, as ‘‘National Family Week’’, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 30 (legislative day, JUNE 19), 1995

Mr. JOHNSTON (for himself, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. NICKLES, Mr. THURMOND,

Mr. HATCH, Mr. LUGAR, Mr. NUNN, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr.

HELMS, Mr. BREAUX, Mr. GORTON, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. COATS, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. HEFLIN, Mr.

BRADLEY, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. ROBB, Mr. REID, Mr. WELLSTONE, Mr.

LOTT, Mr. COVERDELL, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. DODD, Mr. DEWINE, Mr.

SIMON, Mr. FRIST, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. BOND, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. PRESSLER, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. KOHL, Mr. DOLE,

Mr. INHOFE, Mr. BROWN, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. WARNER, Mr. D’AMATO, Mr.

LAUTENBERG, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. MOYNIHAN, and Mr.

PELL) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

NOVEMBER 17 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 16), 1995

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating the week beginning November 19, 1995, and

the week beginning on November 24, 1996, as ‘‘National

Family Week’’, and for other purposes.

Whereas the family is the basic strength of any free and orderly society;

Whereas it is appropriate to honor the family as a unit essential to the continued well-being of the United States; and
2

SRES 146 ATS

Whereas it is fitting that official recognition be given to the

importance of family loyalties and ties: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates the week begin2 ning on November 19, 1995, and the week beginning on

3 November 24, 1996, as ‘‘National Family Week’’. The

4 Senate requests the President to issue a proclamation call5 ing on the people of the United States to observe each

6 week with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          27,026
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,767
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     28,282
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               122,199
<PP&E>                                         347,064
<DEPRECIATION>                                 104,503
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 475,960
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,572
<BONDS>                                        230,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       110,940
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,843
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   185,783
<SALES>                                         56,999
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,999
<CGS>                                           48,953
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,953
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,596
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,729
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    721
<INCOME-TAX>                                       216
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       505
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
null

2017-04-25

468.6115

eng - Argued: 2017-04-25. Docket number: 16-1897
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,873
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             462
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     15,703
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        283,541
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,767
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 323,590
<DEPOSITS>                                     224,517
<SHORT-TERM>                                    29,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,807
<LONG-TERM>                                     29,989
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            28
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,715
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 323,590
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,534
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  257
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    95
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   886
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,398
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,202
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,684
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      120
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,152
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    831
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         831
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       509
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    .036
<LOANS-NON>                                        423
<LOANS-PAST>                                       123
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   311
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    990
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,679
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       32
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,767
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,767
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,472


</TABLE>
NO. 07-04-0318-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL C

	JULY 19, 2004

	______________________________

	IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF 

	LORRAINE SOMMERFELDT, M.D. AND MILUN PANOVICH

AND IN THE INTEREST OF MALINA PANOVICH AND TATIANA PANOVICH, CHILDREN

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

	NO. 52,401-C; HONORABLE PATRICK PIRTLE, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and REAVIS, JJ. 

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Appellant Milun Panovich perfected this appeal from the trial court’s judgment of March 12, 2004.  Pending before this Court is Panovich’s motion to dismiss the appeal by which he represents the parties have resolved all issues and he no longer desires to appeal.  Without passing on the merits of the case we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.1

	Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

						Don H. Reavis

						    Justice
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Michael Goldcamp, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, NIOSH, 1095 Willowdale Road, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, Telephone: (304) 285-5951; Email:                         *mgoldcamp@cdc.gov.*

                        The Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Kalwant Smagh,

Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2022-05802 Filed 3-18-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P