alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, MARK McLEARY, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Candev Resource Exploration Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|Date: January 25, 2008 | /s/ Mark McLeary
Mark McLeary
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
|---------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 318

To commend the exemplary leadership of the Democratic leader.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 3, 1996

Mr. LOTT submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed

to

RESOLUTION

To commend the exemplary leadership of the Democratic

leader.

1 Resolved, That the thanks of the Senate are hereby

2 tendered to the distinguished Democratic leader, the Sen3 ator from South Dakota, the Honorable Thomas A.

4 Daschle, for his exemplary leadership and the cooperative

5 and dedicated manner in which he has performed his lead6 ership responsibilities in the conduct of the Senate busi7 ness during the second session of the 104th Congress.

Æ
SERVICER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION

This Servicer Compliance Certification is issued pursuant to the Tax
Outsourcing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2006 (together with all amendments
thereto, the "Agreement"), between HSBC Mortgage Corporation (USA) ("Bank")
and First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P. ("First American").

I, Lucy A. Przybyla, an authorized officer of the First American, certify
to Bank and with the knowledge and intent that it will rely upon this
certification, that:

1. The servicing information required to be provided to Bank by First
American under the Agreement has been so provided;

2. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by First American
under the Agreement and based upon my knowledge and, except as disclosed in
the annual compliance assessment required to be delivered to Bank (which has
been so delivered to Bank) and as set forth below, in all material respects
throughout the relevant reporting period First American has fulfilled its
obligations under the Agreement; and

3. The following describes the nature of and status of a material failure,
which has been rectified. During 2006, more than ninety-three (93%) percent
of all bank reconciliations were timely completed within thirty (30) days
of receipt. The remaining reconciliations were all completed within thirty
to sixty (30-60) days of receipt. Management has implemented enhanced
controls ensuring that all bank reconciliations are completed within the
thirty (30) day time period. By year end 2006, these enhanced controls
resulted in continual one hundred (100%) percent compliance.



FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS OF TEXAS, L.P.
By: First American Real Estate Solutions LLC
    General Partner

/s/ Lucy A. Przybyla
--------------------------
Lucy A. Przybyla
Senior Vice President
February 28, 2007
JEFFERY D. SHORES

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 2135

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 7, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County

. Robert M. Foster , Judge

.

Jeffery D. Shores, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Samuel B. Steinberg, Assistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, JAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6297 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6297

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
             To reauthorize the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Iran Sanctions Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF IRAN SANCTIONS ACT OF 1996.

    Section 13(b) of the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-
172; 50 U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended by striking ``December 31, 2016'' 
and inserting ``December 31, 2026''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 15, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 6297

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

             To reauthorize the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6081

In Re: MAURICE CORTEZ PROCTOR,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

(CR-85-547-Y, CA-99-1191-Y)

Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 6, 2000

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Maurice Cortez Proctor, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Maurice Cortez Proctor brought this petition for writ of mandamus requesting this court to order the district court to entertain and hear his motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), in which he seeks to vacate his judgment and sentence

and to be resentenced. The district court construed the motion as

one pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999), and dismissed

it without prejudice to Proctor’s ability to move in the court of

appeals for authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion. See

28 U.S.C.A. § 2244 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999).

Proctor has not met his burden of showing that he has “no

other adequate means to attain the relief he desires” and that his

right to such relief is “clear and indisputable.” See Allied Chem.

Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980). Proctor could have

noted an appeal from the district court’s order, see In re United

Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979) (mandamus not a

substitute for appeal), or he could file a motion in this court

seeking authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion. Therefore, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny

the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
# EUR-Lex - 32003R0289 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32003R0289

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 289/2003 of 14 February 2003 fixing the maximum export refund on wholly milled round grain, medium grain and long grain A rice to be exported to certain third countries in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1897/2002 **

*
Official Journal L 042 , 15/02/2003 P. 0034 - 0034 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 289/2003

of 14 February 2003

fixing the maximum export refund on wholly milled round grain, medium grain and long grain A rice to be exported to certain third countries in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1897/2002

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 3072/95 of 22 December 1995 on the common organisation of the market in rice(1), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 411/2002(2), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) An invitation to tender for the export refund on rice was issued pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1897/2002(3).

(2) Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 584/75(4), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1948/2002(5), allows the Commission to fix, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 22 of Regulation (EC) No 3072/95 and on the basis of the tenders submitted, a maximum export refund. In fixing this maximum, the criteria provided for in Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 3072/95 must be taken into account. A contract is awarded to any tenderer whose tender is equal to or less than the maximum export refund.

(3) The application of the abovementioned criteria to the current market situation for the rice in question results in the maximum export refund being fixed at the amount specified in Article 1.

(4) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The maximum export refund on wholly milled grain, medium grain and long grain A rice to be exported to certain third countries pursuant to the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1897/2002 is hereby fixed on the basis of the tenders submitted from 10 to 13 February 2003 at 165,00 EUR/t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 15 February 2003.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 February 2003.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 329, 30.12.1995, p. 18.

(2) OJ L 62, 5.3.2002, p. 27.

(3) OJ L 287, 25.10.2002, p. 8.

(4) OJ L 61, 7.3.1975, p. 25.

(5) OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 18.
#### Betty Jean TURNER, Appellant v. John ENZLER, Monsignor and Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Washington, District of Columbia, Appellees

No. 17-7053

September Term, 2017

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Filed On: February 5, 2018

Betty Jean Turner, Pro Se

Tina Marie Maiolo, Esquire, Attorney, Carr Maloney PC, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellees

BEFORE: Srinivasan, Pillard, and Wilkins, Circuit Judges

*13JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed February 21, 2017, be affirmed. The district court correctly held that no reasonable jury could find that appellee Catholic Charities’ legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for terminating appellant’s employment was pretextual and that Catholic Charities discriminated against her on the basis of race or age. See, e.g., Brady v. Office of the Sergeant at Arms, 520 F.3d 490, 496 (D.C. Cir. 2008).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41,
#### Patrick J. KELLY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC; IndyMac Mortgage Services; OneWest Bank, N.A.; Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as Trustee for Residential Asset Securitization Trust 2007-A9 Mortgage Pass Through Certificates Series 2007-I, Defendants-appellees, and Carrie M. Ward; Howard N. Bierman; Jacob Geesing; Pratima Lele; Joshua Coleman; Richard R. Goldsmith, Jr.; Ludeen McCartney-Green; Jason Kutcher; Nicholas Derdock; Elizabeth C. Jones, Defendants.

No. 17-1843

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 30, 2018

Decided: February 1, 2018

*130Patrick J. Kelly, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Win-Teh Chang, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Andrew Michael Williamson, BLANK ROME, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not bÜKjing precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Patrick J. Kelly appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action seeking a declaratory judgment that his loan with Defendant was rescinded by his notices sent to the lender. Because his action to enforce the rescission was not filed within the applicable time period, the district court dismissed the action as time-barred. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Kelly v. OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC,*No. 1:17-cv-00039-GLR, 2017 WL 4478250 (D. Md. June 20, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
#### Fausto Renato QUEVEDO, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 16-70507

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted November 14, 2017 * Pasadena, California

Filed November 16, 2017

Shan Potts, Attorney, Law Offices of Shan Potts, Glendale, CA, for Petitioner

Nancy Canter, Michael Christopher Heyse, Trial Attorneys, OIL, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: KOZINSKI, HAWKINS and PARKER,** Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Barrington D. Parker, Jr., United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

To qualify for Convention Against Torture relief a petitioner must show that “it is more likely than not that he ... would be tortured if removed to the proposed country of removal,” 8 C.F.R. § 208.16(c)(2). The IJ didn’t err by finding that Quevedo failed to meet this standard. *614Substantial evidence supported the IJ’s determination that the beating Quevedo suffered wasn’t torture. See Ahmed v. Keisler, 504 F.3d 1183, 1201 (9th Cir. 2007). His later peaceful interaction with Guatemalan police further demonstrates that he’s unlikely to be tortured if returned to Guatemala.

DENIED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### Rigoberto RODRIGUEZ-GUTIERREZ, AKA Rogoberto Rodriguez-Gutierrez, AKA Ruberto Rodriguez-Gutierrez, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 16-71205

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted October 23, 2017 *

Filed October 31, 2017

Gabriel Gomez Leyba, Crossroads Law Group LLP, Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioner

OIL, Matt A. Crapo, Attorney, DOJ— U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: McKEOWN, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Rigoberto Rodriguez-Gutierrez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“U”) decision denying his application for relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT"). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. *Go v. Holder,*640 F.3d 1047, 1052 (9th Cir. 2011). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of Rodriguez-Gutierrez’s CAT claim because, even if credible, he failed to establish it is more likely than not that he would be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Mexico. *See id.*at 1054 (record evidence insufficient to compel conclusion that petitioner was more likely than not to be tortured); *Zheng v. Holder,*644 F.3d 829, 835-36 (9th Cir. 2011) (fear of torture speculative).

We do not address Rodriguez-Gutierrez’s contention regarding the IJ’s particularly serious crime finding because the BIA expressly declined to reach this finding.

We reject Rodriguez-Gutierrez’s contention that the agency failed to consider record evidence.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 02, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, March 02, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15I0125. PAUL J. KEGEL v. LOUISE M. KEGEL . Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 13CV1230
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7659

DARREN HENDERSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DENNIS BIDWELL, Warden; UNITED STATES BUREAU

OF PRISONS,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.

(CA-97-2521-WMN)

Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 14, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darren Brett Henderson, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia,

United States Attorney, Larry David Adams, Assistant United States

Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief

on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition, and denying his motion

for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Henderson v. Bidwell,

No. CA-97-2521-WMN (D. Md. Oct. 24, 31, and Nov. 12, 1997). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4533-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Alaska (FEMA-4533-DR), dated April 9, 2020, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This change occurred on March 4, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order                           ( print page 16013)                        12148, as amended, Willie G. Nunn, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.                

This action terminates the appointment of Vincent J. Maykovich as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2022-05914 Filed 3-18-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P