alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Azizeh RASHIDI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-55542

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted November 15, 2017 *

Filed November 20, 2017

Lawrence David Rohlfing, Attorney, Law Offices of Lawrence Rohlfing, Santa Fe Springs, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant

Daniel Paul Talbert, Special Assistant U.S. Attorney, Henry L, Chi, Social Security Administration, Office of the General Counsel, San Francisco, CA, Thomas C. Stahl, Chief Counsel, Office of the US Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Azizeh Rashidi appeals the district court’s decision affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of her application for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. *570We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Brown-Hunter v. Colvin,*806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015), and we reverse and remand.

Rashidi contends that, at step five of the sequential analysis, the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) erred in relying on the vocational expert’s testimony that she could perform work as a sorter, staffer, and polisher even though the ALJ assessed she retained the residual functional capacity to use her right, dominant hand only occasionally for fine and gross manipulation. Under *Lomear v. Berryhill,*865 F.3d 1201 (9th Cir. 2017), this contention has merit. There was an apparent conflict between the expert’s testimony and the *Dictionary of Occupational Titles,*which provides that the occupations .identified by the expert require frequent handling and fingering. *See id.*at 1206 (concluding that there was an apparent conflict between the *Dictionary*and a vocational expert’s opinion that a claimant with left hand and arm limitations could work as an office helper, mail clerk, or parking lot cashier). The ALJ erred by failing to ask the expert to reconcile the conflict. *See Gutierrez v. Colvin,*844 F.3d 804, 807 (9th Cir 2016). This error was not harmless because it is not possible to determine from the record, the *Dictionary,*or common experience whether the jobs of sorter, staffer, and polisher require both hands. *See Lomear,*865 F.3d at 1206-07 (reversing and remanding to permit ALJ to follow up with vocational expert).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 14 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 637 

[Report No. 114–20, Part I] 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the rule 

allowing certain tax-free distributions from individual retirement accounts 

for charitable purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2015 

Mr. SCHOCK (for himself and Mr. BLUMENAUER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

FEBRUARY 9, 2015 

Additional sponsors: Mr. COSTELLO of Pennsylvania and Mr. REED

FEBRUARY 9, 2015 

Reported from the Committee on Ways and Means with an amendment 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

FEBRUARY 9, 2015 

The Committee on the Budget discharged; committed to the Committee of the 

Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on February 2, 2015] 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 637 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

permanent the rule allowing certain tax-free distributions 

from individual retirement accounts for charitable purposes. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 637 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Permanent IRA Chari5 table Contribution Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RULE ALLOWING CERTAIN TAX-FREE DISTRIBU7 TIONS FROM INDIVIDUAL RETIREMENT AC8 COUNTS FOR CHARITABLE PURPOSES MADE 

9 PERMANENT. 

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 408(d)(8) of the Internal 

11 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking subparagraph 

12 (F). 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by this 

14 section shall apply to distributions made in taxable years 

15 beginning after December 31, 2014. 

16 SEC. 3. BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

17 The budgetary effects of this Act shall not be entered 

18 on either PAYGO scorecard maintained pursuant to section 

19 4(d) of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

Union Calendar No. 14 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 637 

[Report No. 114–20, Part I] 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

counts for charitable purposes. free distributions from individual retirement acmake permanent the rule allowing certain taxFEBRUARY 9, 2015 

Reported from the Committee on Ways and Means with 

an amendment 

FEBRUARY 9, 2015 

The Committee on the Budget discharged; committed to 

Union and ordered to be printed the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 205 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

  1st Session
S. RES. 205

To authorize testimony by Senate employee and representation by Senate 
                             Legal Counsel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 22, 1995

    Mr. Dole (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To authorize testimony by Senate employee and representation by Senate 
                             Legal Counsel.

Whereas, in the case of United States of America v. Karl Zielinski, Case No. 
        F12187-94, a criminal action pending in the Superior Court of the 
        District of Columbia, the United States Attorney has caused a trial 
        subpoena to be served on Michael O'Leary, a Senate employee on the staff 
        of the Committee on the Judiciary;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be 
        taken from such control or possession but by permission of the Senate;
Whereas when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take 
        such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate; and
Whereas pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its 
        counsel to represent employees of the Senate with respect to requests 
        for testimony made to them in their official capacities: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That Michael O'Leary is authorized to provide testimony 
in the case of United States of America v. Karl Zielinski, except 
concerning matters for which a privilege should be asserted.
    Sec. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent Michael 
O'Leary in connection with the testimony authorized by section 1 of 
this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL AND EXECUTIVE FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of China Growth Corporation (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Rozelle, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: October 7, 2009



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Joseph Rozelle                                                  
|Joseph Rozelle
President
(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**Certification**

I, Jeffrey Cote, Chief Financial Officer of Sensata Technologies B.V., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Sensata Technologies B.V.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: March 22, 2007
# Official Journal L 122/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 122 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5819 May 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 122

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5819 May 2015

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/775 of 18 May 2015 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 908/2014 as regards conformity clearance | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/776 of 18 May 2015 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Regulation (EU) No 502/2013 on imports of bicycles originating in the People's Republic of China to imports of bicycles consigned from Cambodia, Pakistan and the Philippines, whether declared as originating in Cambodia, Pakistan and the Philippines or not | 4 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/777 of 18 May 2015 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 29 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/778 of 18 May 2015 on a European Union military operation in the Southern Central Mediterranean (EUNAVFOR MED) | 31 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/775 of 18 May 2015 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 908/2014 as regards conformity clearance

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/776 of 18 May 2015 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Regulation (EU) No 502/2013 on imports of bicycles originating in the People's Republic of China to imports of bicycles consigned from Cambodia, Pakistan and the Philippines, whether declared as originating in Cambodia, Pakistan and the Philippines or not

4

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/777 of 18 May 2015 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

29

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/778 of 18 May 2015 on a European Union military operation in the Southern Central Mediterranean (EUNAVFOR MED)

31

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

WILLIE JAMES LOVE, JR., Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 21-0081 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Mohave County

No. S8015CR201400553

The Honorable Derek C. Carlisle, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

APPEARANCES

Mohave County Attorney’s Office, Kingman

By Matthew J. Smith

Counsel for Respondent

Willie James Love, Jr., San Luis

Petitioner

FILED 8-24-2021
STATE v. LOVE

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Jennifer B. Campbell, Judge Samuel A. Thumma, and Chief 

Judge Kent E. Cattani delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Willie James Love, Jr., seeks review of the superior 

court’s order denying his latest successive petition for post-conviction 

relief. 

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this Court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to 

show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition 

for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 

2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of 

discretion. 

¶4 We grant review but deny relief.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12




                             Lucent Technologies Inc.
                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

                              (Dollars in Millions)
                                   (Unaudited)


                                                               For the Six
                                                               Months Ended
                                                              March 31, 1999

Income Before Income Taxes.............................           $ 2,826

Less Interest Capitalized during
  the Period...........................................                 9
Less Undistributed Earnings of Less than 50%
  Owned Affiliates.....................................                 2

Add Fixed Charges......................................               272

Total Earnings ........................................           $ 3,087



Fixed Charges

Total Interest Expense Including Capitalized Interest..           $   191

Interest Portion of Rental Expense.....................                81

    Total Fixed Charges................................           $   272

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.....................              11.3
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 30

Providing for the reappointment of Homer Alfred Neal as a citizen regent

of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 20 (legislative day, MARCH 16), 1995

Mr. MOYNIHAN (for himself, Mr. COCHRAN, and Mr. SIMPSON) introduced the

following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the reappointment of Homer Alfred Neal as

a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on

5 the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in

6 the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by

7 reason of the expiration of the term of Homer Alfred Neal

8 of Michigan on December 6, 1995, is filled by the re-
2

SJ 30 IS

1 appointment of the incumbent for a term of six years, ef2 fective December 7, 1995.

Æ
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED




PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the report of Fuqi International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/  Yu Kwai
ChongYu
      Kwai ChongChief
      Executive Officer and PresidentMarch
      9, 2009/s/  Ching Wan
    WongChing
      Wan WongChief
      Financial OfficerMarch
      9, 2009




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Fuqi International, Inc. and will be retained by Fuqi International,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request
# Official Journal L 357/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 357 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 648 October 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 357

English edition

Legislation

Volume 648 October 2021

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2021/1755 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 October 2021 establishing the Brexit Adjustment Reserve | 1 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2021/1756 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 October 2021 amending Regulation (EU) 2017/625 as regards official controls on animals and products of animal origin exported from third countries to the Union in order to ensure compliance with the prohibition of certain uses of antimicrobials and Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 as regards the direct supply of meat from poultry and lagomorphs (
  1
  ) | 27 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) 2021/1755 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 October 2021 establishing the Brexit Adjustment Reserve

1

*

Regulation (EU) 2021/1756 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 October 2021 amending Regulation (EU) 2017/625 as regards official controls on animals and products of animal origin exported from third countries to the Union in order to ensure compliance with the prohibition of certain uses of antimicrobials and Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 as regards the direct supply of meat from poultry and lagomorphs (
  1
  )

1

27

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.