alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 105 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 105

  Condemning Iran for the violent suppression of a protest in Teheran.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 5, 1995

 Mr. D'Amato submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Condemning Iran for the violent suppression of a protest in Teheran.

Whereas an estimated crowd of 100,000 Iranian people assembled in southern 
        Teheran on April 4, 1995, to protest sharp price increases and a 
        shortage of water, and other important staples of daily life;
Whereas the Iranian Revolutionary Guard and the Bassidj, a political militia, 
        have been granted the right to ``shoot-to-kill'' in order to quell 
        disturbances; and
Whereas these forces, supplemented by armed helicopter gunships, on April 4, 
        1995, opened fire on the demonstrators killing as many as 150 people, 
        thereby ending the protest: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the President 
should immediately condemn this brutal suppression of a crowd of 
protesters resulting in the death of as many as 150 people by the 
Government of Iran and instruct the United States Ambassador to the 
United Nations to bring this matter before the United Nations Security 
Council with the intent of pursuing a Security Council condemnation of 
Iran.
                                 <all>
```
SERVED AUGUST 29, 2011 ._ ,.,, 

'.•Tr/-.h!iviuNl Ui 

•;•v\l^:^^U!ilAliUi.••i 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION :'/ ••pT QPER^^-^TIOMS 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASH[NGTON,DC ^C:: M)G 'sO A ^^3 3 

IN THE MATTER OF 

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

{Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2011-077S 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 20I0SW270081) has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hcaiing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Sei'vice List. 

Ronnie A. Yckler 

Chief AdministrativfiHi^w Judge 

Attachment - Sei'vice List 
FDMS NO. FAA-2011-0778 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Thomas Newton Boih'ng, Respondettl '.v Counsel 

Vice President and Associate General Counsel 

United Airlines and Continental Airlines, Inc., Respondent 

11 W. Wacker Drive-16"' Floor 

Chicago, IL 60601 

TEL: 312-997-8068 

FAX: 312-997-8068 

Tim Duff, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of Regional Counsel, ASW-7 

Southwest Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 MeachamBlvd. 

Ft. Worth, TX 76193^0007 

TEL 817-222-5099 

FAX 817-222-5945/5092 

The Honorable Richard C Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202- 366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Adnmustratioii 600 Indcpe/ide/ice Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wriglil Btiilding—Snile 2\VI0{K>. Waslungtoa 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14306-14307]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05473]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, March 17, 2022.

PLACE: The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the 
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

[[Page 14307]]


STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website 
at https://www.sec.gov.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the 
following topics:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of 
adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information; please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.)

    Dated: March 10, 2022.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-05473 Filed 3-10-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
EX 32.2

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of Nanoscience  Technologies,  Inc.,  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
John T. Ruddy,  Principal Accounting  Officer of  the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.  Sec. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Sec. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                              By: /s/ John T. Ruddy
                              -------------------------
                              Name:  JOHN T. RUDDY
                              Title: Chief Financial Officer
                              Date:  December 27, 2007


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement   required  by  Section   906,  has  been   provided  to   Nanoscience
Technologies,  Inc. and will be retained by Nanoscience  Technologies,  Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 10.4
 AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO AMENDED AND RESTATED
CREDIT AGREEMENT AND WAIVER
 Amendment), (Parent), (Zicam) Borrower Borrowers), (Bank),
 Agreement);
 Subject Defaults);
   Defined Terms.
 Amendment to Section 7. 15(c) .
  Waiver of Subject Defaults.
 1




---



##### 



Representations
and Warranties.
    Conditions Precedent to Effectiveness of Amendment.
     Counterparts; Telefacsimile Execution.
 2




---



##### 



Integration.
 Reqffirmation of the Agreement.
 [remainder of page intentionally left blank; signatures to follow]
 3




---



##### 



MATRIXX INITIATIVES, INC.,a DelawarecorporationBy:

/s/ William J. HemeltName:
    William J. HemeltTitle:
    CFO/EVPZICAM, LLC, an Arizona limited liability companyBy:

/s/ William J. HemeltName:
    William J. HemeltTitle:
    MGR/CFOCOMERICA BANKBy:
    /s/ William J. KirschnerName:
    William J. KirschnerTitle:
    Vice President S-1
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

A.J., the Father

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 1123

[ September 24, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Shari Africk Olefson , Judge; L.T. Case No. 16

- 001409DP

.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Paul O'Neil, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civi l Regional Counsel, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carolyn Schwarz, Assistant Attorney General, Children’s Legal Services, Fort Lauderdale , for appellee.

Thomasina F. Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Samantha C. Valley, Senior Attorney, Statewide Guardian Ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for Guardian Ad Litem Program.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

C IKLIN
, F ORST and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,223
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,765
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     22,721
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           7,970
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         49,928
<ALLOWANCE>                                        146
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  85,434
<DEPOSITS>                                      53,506
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,128
<LONG-TERM>                                      9,384
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,416
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  85,434
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,055
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  293
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    72
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,420
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 638
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 745
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              675
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    719
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (34)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        (22)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (22)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.07
<LOANS-NON>                                        125
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     17
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   146
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  146
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            146
        

</TABLE>
NO. 07-07-0198-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

MAY 30, 2007

______________________________

JUAN DANIEL MORALES, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 222ND DISTRICT COURT OF DEAF SMITH COUNTY;

NO. CR-061-107; HONORABLE H. BRYAN POFF, JR., JUDGE

_______________________________

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Following pleas of guilty, Appellant, Juan Daniel Morales, was convicted of one

count of aggravated sexual assault and one count of sexual assault and sentenced to

twenty years confinement. The Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right to Appeal

reflects that Appellant agreed to a plea bargain and has no right of appeal. The
The thirtieth day fell on Sunday, April 22, 2007, but was extended to the following 1

day pursuant to Rule 4.1(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

2

certification further reflects that Appellant has waived his right of appeal. The trial court

imposed Appellant’s sentence on March 23, 2007. No motion for new trial was filed. On

May 14, 2007, Appellant, proceeding pro se, filed a “Motion for Notice of Appeal.” We

dismiss for want of jurisdiction.

This Court’s appellate jurisdiction in a criminal case is invoked by a timely filed

notice of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996). Where, as

here, no motion for new trial was filed, the notice was due within thirty days after the date

sentence was imposed. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). Absent a timely filed notice of appeal,

a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal in a

criminal case and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal for want of

jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998). 

The trial court imposed Appellant’s sentence on March 23, 2007, setting the

deadline in which to file a notice of appeal at Monday, April 23, 2007. The Texas Rules 1

of Appellate Procedure provide a fifteen day extension in which to file a notice of appeal.

Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. However, Appellant’s notice, which was filed on May 14, 2007, also

failed to meet that deadline. Rule 2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, which

authorizes this Court to suspend the operation of a rule for good cause, does not permit

the suspension of the time limit for perfecting an appeal. Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 209-10.
3

 Consequently, this purported appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Patrick A. Pirtle

 Justice

Do not publish.
EXHIBIT 32

   CERTIFICATIONS OF JOSEPH R. ROZELLE, PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
     PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER, PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Seven Seas Acquisition
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, the undersigned officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  October 15, 2007                  /s/ Joseph R. Rozelle
                                         --------------------------
                                         JOSEPH R. ROZELLE
                                         Principal Executive Officer
                                         and Principal Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the
Form 10-K pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being
filed as part of the Form 10-K for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference
into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
EXHIBIT 32

   CERTIFICATIONS OF JOSEPH R. ROZELLE, PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
     PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER, PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bering Growth
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, the undersigned officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  October 15, 2007                  /s/ Joseph R. Rozelle
                                         --------------------------
                                         JOSEPH R. ROZELLE
                                         Principal Executive Officer
                                         and Principal Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the
Form 10-K pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being
filed as part of the Form 10-K for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference
into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel MORIN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-10110 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 18, 2017

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Kevin Joel Page, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Daniel Morin pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2), and was sentenced to 70 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. He argues that the district court plainly erred in determining that his Texas aggravated robbery conviction is a crime of violence for purposes of imposing the base offense level in U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(3). He argues that Texas robbery is not a crime of violence because it lacks the requisite element of the use of force. However, he concedes that this court has already held that Texas robbery is a crime of violence because it meets the generic definition of the enumerated crime-of-violence offense of robbery, and he raises his argument to preserve it for further review.

Morin’s argument is foreclosed by *United States v. Santiesteban-Hernandez,*469 F.3d 376, 380-81 (5th Cir. 2006), *overruled on other grounds by United States v. Rodriguez,*711 F.3d 541, 547-63 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc), in which we held that robbery in violation of Texas Penal Code § 29,02 meets the generic definition of the enumerated crime-of-violence offense of robbery. *See also United States v. Sanchez-Lopez,*493 Fed.Appx. 557, 558 (5th Cir. 2012). Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir, R. 47.5.4.
# C_2019082EN.01003601.xml

| 4.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2018 — Post Bank Iran v Council

(Case T-559/15) (1)

((Non-contractual liability - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Iran - Freezing of funds - Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures - Non-material damage))

(2019/C 82/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Post Bank Iran (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: D. Luff, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and M. Bishop, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Ronkes Agerbeek and R. Tricot, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 268 TFEU for compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant following the adoption of Council Decision 2010/644/CFSP of 25 October 2010 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP (OJ 2010 L 281, p. 81), of Council Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 of 25 October 2010 on restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 (OJ 2010 L 281, p. 1), of Council Decision 2011/783/CFSP of 1 December 2011 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 319, p. 71), of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1245/2011 of 1 December 2011 implementing Regulation No 961/2010 (OJ 2011 L 319, p. 11), and of Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation No 961/2010 (OJ 2012 L 88, p. 1), by which the applicant’s name was included and maintained on the lists of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Post Bank Iran to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Post Bank Iran to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 27, 25.1.2016.

---