alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 282

To designate October 10, 1996, as the ‘‘Day of National Concern About

Young People and Gun Violence’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 24, 1996

Mr. BRADLEY (for himself, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. WELLSTONE, Mr. FRIST, Mr.

LEVIN, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. DEWINE, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. THURMOND, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mr. BIDEN, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. GLENN, Mr.

REID, Mr. SIMON, Mr. KOHL, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. DODD, Mr.

CHAFEE, Mr. BENNETT, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. COATS, Mr. D’AMATO, Mr.

BROWN, Mrs. KASSEBAUM, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. BURNS, Mr.

GRAHAM, Mr. NICKLES, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. ROTH, Mr. DORGAN, Mrs.

HUTCHISON, Mr. PRYOR, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr.

FAIRCLOTH, Mr. BUMPERS, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr.

THOMPSON, Mr. KERRY, Mr. COHEN, Mr. JOHNSTON, Mr. GORTON, Mr.

KENNEDY, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. ROBB, Mr. KEMPTHORNE, Ms. MOSELEYBRAUN, Mr. MACK, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. GRAMS, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. CAMPBELL, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. COCHRAN,

Mr. HEFLIN, Mrs. FRAHM, Mr. EXON, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. FORD, Mr.

ASHCROFT, Mr. BYRD, Mr. GREGG, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. HATFIELD, Mrs.

FEINSTEIN, Mr. LUGAR, Mr. KERREY, Mr. SANTORUM, Mr. NUNN, Mr.

THOMAS, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. WARNER, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. HELMS, Mr.

BREAUX, Mr. BRYAN, and Mr. PELL) submitted the following resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

AUGUST 2, 1996

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To designate October 10, 1996, as the ‘‘Day of National

Concern About Young People and Gun Violence’’.
2

•SRES 282 ATS

Whereas violent crime among juveniles in American society

has dramatically escalated in recent years;

Whereas between 1989 and 1994, juvenile arrest rates for

murder in this country skyrocketed 42 percent;

Whereas in 1993, more than 10 children were murdered each

day in America;

Whereas America’s young people are this country’s most important resource, and Americans have a vested interest in

helping children survive, free from fear and violence, to

become healthy adults;

Whereas America’s young people can, by taking individual

and collective responsibility for their own decisions and

actions, help chart a new and less violent direction for

the entire country;

Whereas American school children will be invited to participate in a national observance involving millions of their

fellow students and will thereby be empowered to see

themselves as the agents of positive social change; and

Whereas this observance will give American school children

the opportunity to make a solemn decision about their future and control their destiny by voluntarily signing a

pledge promising that they will never take a gun to

school, will never use a gun to resolve a dispute, and will

use their influence to prevent friends from using guns to

settle disputes: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates October 10,

2 1996, as the ‘‘Day of National Concern About Young Peo3 ple and Gun Violence’’. The President is authorized and

4 requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the school
3

•SRES 282 ATS

1 children of the United States to observe such day with

2 appropriate activities.

Æ
DELTA ~ 

January 25, 2016 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

400 7th Street SW, Plaza 401 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Exemption No. 10690, (Docket No. FAA-2013-0034) 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Delta Air Lines, Inc. 

Post Office Box 20706 

Atlanta, Georgia 30320-6001 

By letter dated December 29, 2015, Airlines for America {A4A)/the National Air Carrier Association, and 

the Regional Airline Association, on behalf of their passenger airline members (See enclosure 1) and 

similarly-situated air carriers, petition for a limited exemption from 14 CFR §121.803(c)(3) which 

requires airplanes with seating capacity of more than nine passengers to carry an Emergency Medical 

Kit (EMK) with contents as specified in Appendix A to Part 121. Specifically, they request that FAA issue 

a long-term exemption for use during periods of temporary supply shortages, beyond operator control, 

affecting availability of injectable drugs Atropine, Dextrose, Lidocaine, or Epinephrine, named in Part 

121, Appendix A. 

Delta Air Lines, Inc. (Delta) requests that the FAA, when granting the requested exemption, specifically 

include the requested reference "and similarly-situated air carriers" per the petition as membership with 

A4A, NACA, or RAA should not be a prerequisite for continuing to operate under the conditions and 

limitations of the requested relief. It would not be in the public interest to omit a carrier who has been 

operating under the relief of previous issue exemptions within the conditions and limitations set 

forward, simply due to not being a member of one of these groups. 

This would not set a precedent as many other exemptions are granted other similarly situated Part 121 

certificate holders e.g. Exemptions 3585, 4298, 4416, and 5533. 

If you have any questions or require any additional information please contact Casey Seabright, 

Manager-Compliance & Incident Management at (404) 715-1536, or Chuck Schramek, DirectorQuality Assurance & Compliance at (404) 715-11 12. 

Respectfully, 

Charles M. Schramek 

Director- Quality Assurance & Compliance 

Flight Operations 

CMS: cws
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION Ill 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 

The Honorable Robert M. Summers 

Secretary, Maryland Department of the Environment 

1800 Washington Boulevard 

Baltimore, Maryland 21230 

Dear Secretary Summers: 

JAN 0 21013 

On December 31,2012, the U.S. Enviromnental Protection Agency (EPA) received a 

revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP revision was submitted to 

address infrastructure elements (A)-(M) of Section 11 O(a)(2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) which 

are necessary to implement, maintain, and enforce the 2008 ozone National Ambient Air QuaHty 

Standards (NAAQS) in Maryland. EPA has determined that the submittal is complete for these 

clements. · 

Tfmembcrs ofyour staffhave any questions, they may direct them toMs. Ruth Knapp, 

Office of Air Program Planning, at (2 J 5) 814-2191. 

Sincerely, 

UX·\..,~C'\_ ~ 

Diana Esher, Director 

Air Protection Division 

cc: George (Tad) S. Aburn, Jr., Director, Air And Radiation Management Administration 

Diana Franks, M£mager, Air Quality Planning Program 

Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 170 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

  1st Session
S. RES. 170

          To appoint various chairmen for the 104th Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 12 (legislative day, September 5), 1995

 Mr. Dole submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
          To appoint various chairmen for the 104th Congress.

    Resolved, That the following Senators are named chairmen of the 
following committees for the 104th Congress, or until their successors 
are appointed:
    Committee on Finance: William Roth of Delaware.
    Committee on Governmental Affairs: Ted Stevens of Alaska.
    Committee on Rules and Administration: John Warner of Virginia.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I,
Kang Chungmai, certify, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Amendment
No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tsingda eEdu Corporation for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in this Amendment No. 3 to Annual Report on Form 10-K
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Tsingda eEdu Corporation.

|                       |        |                               
|---------------------- | ------ | ------------------------------
|                       | By:    | /s/ Kang Chungmai             
|                       |        |                               
|Date: January 16, 2013 | Name:  | Kang Chungmai                 
|                       | Title: | Chief
 Financial Officer      
|                       |        | (Principal
 Financial Officer)

---
Exhibit 35.5



|     |                        |                              
|---- | ---------------------- | -----------------------------
|LOGO |                        | Commercial Mortgage Servicing
|     | D1086-120, 12th Floor 
|     | 550 South Tryon Street
|     | Charlotte, NC 28202   
|     | 1-800-326-1334        

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2014, by and among WELLS FARGO
COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as General Special Servicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Master Servicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Special Servicer,
PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C22 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify
that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015, (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such
period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of
March 2016.



|                        
|------------------------
|LOGO                    
|Daniel Bober            
|Executive Vice President
|Wells Fargo Bank        



LOGO
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 204 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

  1st Session
S. RES. 204

          To authorize representation by Senate Legal Counsel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 22, 1995

    Mr. Dole (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
          To authorize representation by Senate Legal Counsel.

Whereas, in the case of Charles Okoren, et al. v. Fyfe Symington, et al., No. 
        CV-95-2527-PHX-RCB, pending in the United States District Court for the 
        District of Arizona, the plaintiffs have named the United States Senate 
        as a defendant;
Whereas pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978 (2 U.S.C. sections 288b(a) and 288c(a)(1) (1994)), the 
        Senate may direct its counsel to defend the Senate in civil actions 
        relating to its official responsibilities: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent 
the United States Senate in the case of Charles Okoren, et al. v. Fyfe 
Symington, et al.
                                 <all>
```
#### Karl Richard THORPE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Rick RAEMISCH, Director; Matthew Hensen; Cynthia Coffman, the Attorney General of the State of Colorado, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 17-1290

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Filed November 22, 2017

(D.C. No. 1:17-CV-Q1670-LTB) (D. Colorado)

Karl Thorpe, Pro Se

Before KELLY, HARTZ, and BACHARACH, Circuit Judges.

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY *

Karl Richard Thorpe, a Colorado prisoner appearing pro se, seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) to challenge the district court’s denial of his application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We deny a COA and dismiss this matter.

*709After his convictions in state court for burglary, sexual assault, theft, and menacing, and his adjudication as a habitual criminal, Thorpe was sentenced to two consecutive fifty-year terms of imprisonment. The district court dismissed his previous § 2254 application as time-barred and procedurally barred, and we denied a COA. *See Thorpe v. Soares,*182 F.3d 933, 1999 WL 314636 (10th Cir. May 19, 1999) (unpublished table decision). The district court dismissed his most recent § 2254 application for lack of jurisdiction because he did not obtain authorization from this court to file a second or successive application, Thorpe now seeks a COA to appeal that ruling.

To establish his entitlement to a COA, Thorpe must make “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Where, as here, a district court denies a § 2254 application on procedural grounds, a COA may issue only if “the prisoner shows, at least, that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and .., whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.” *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000).

Based on our review of Thorpe’s application for a COA and the record on appeal, we conclude he has failed to establish his entitlement to a COA. Thorpe does not address the district court’s determination that his application was second or successive, let alone persuade us that jurists of reason would find that determination debatable.

Accordingly, we deny a COA, We also deny Thorpe’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis because he has not shown “the existence of a reasoned, nonfrivolous argument on the law and facts in support of the issues raised” in his application. *Buchheit v. Green,*705 F.3d 1157, 1161 (10th Cir. 2012) (internal quotation marks omitted).

*

 This order is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32,1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

19 January 2006

(2006/C 15/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
IV

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 52

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 4, 1996

Referred to the Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas many States have encouraged and facilitated the

creation of senior citizen legislative and advocacy bodies;

Whereas in creating such bodies such States have provided to

many older Americans the opportunity to express concerns, promote appropriate interests, and advance the

common good by influencing the legislation and actions

of State government; and

Whereas a National Silver Haired Congress, with representatives from each State, would provide a national forum for

a nonpartisan evaluation of grassroots solutions to concerns shared by an increasing number of older Americans: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That the Congress hereby recognizes and en-
2

SCON 52 RFH

1 courages the convening of an annual National Silver

2 Haired Congress in the District of Columbia.

Passed the Senate August 2, 1996.

Attest: KELLY D. JOHNSTON,

Secretary.
Subpart W Stakeholders Conference Call 

April 3, 2014

ATTENDEES

EPA: Reid Rosnick, Susan Stahle (OGC), Angelique Diaz (Region 8) 

Environmental Groups/Tribes: Sarah Fields, Uranium Watch; Aaron Mentzes, Earthworks; 

Paul Robinson, SW Research and Information Center; Scott Clow, Mike King, Ute Mountain 

Ute Tribe 

Uranium Industry/Other: Jim Cain, Cotter; Scott Bakken, Cameco; Richard Bluebaugh, 

Powertech; Darrel Lyles, SENES; Richard Potter 

UPDATE 

Reid began the call with a welcome and by taking attendance. Reid had a couple of items to 

share. 

EPA has addressed the comments from OMB staff and other interagency comments successfully. 

OMB staff has cleared the draft rulemaking and it was reviewed by OMB management. OMB 

officially cleared the draft proposed rulemaking on January 13, 2014. The package was returned 

to EPA, where several housekeeping items were be addressed, and the package began its trip to 

the Administrator’s office for signature. After signature the proposed rule will be sent to the 

Office of the Federal Register for publication, probably this month. 

DISCUSSION 

Sarah: How long is the comment period? 

Reid: 90 days 

Scott: Has EPA considered placing the rule (when it’s published) on the American Indian 

Environmental Office (AIEO) portion of EPA’s website? Reid will look into it. Joann Chase is a 

contact in AIEO. 

There was a request for a summary of what is in the proposed rule. Reid stated that that 

information cannot be released until after the proposal has been published in the Federal 

Register. 

Question on if the proposed rule... will it include response to comments received – Reid clarified 

the process. The final rulemaking will include a response to all the comments in the preamble or 

a separate document, depending on the volume of comments. You will see some comments 

received to date addressed in the rule. 
Sarah – Will it go on the federal rulemaking website? www.regulations.gov Reid – yes, the 

rulemaking will have a specific number and you can either 1. Submit a comment or 2. Read other 

comments at that website. 

Sarah –Any idea of schedule after comments received? Reid – it will depend on the scope of the 

comments and if they have been addressed already or not. 

Darryl – Joined late and asked for a process update. Reid – summarized info stated in his update. 

Next call: Thursday, July 3, 2014 at 11 AM Eastern Time.

___________________________________end____________________________________
#### Corey Levon BECKHAM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-1904

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 21, 2017

Decided: December 27, 2017

*170Corey Levon Beckham, Appellant Pro Se. Victoria Lee Johnson, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Corey Levon Beckham seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief *on*Beckham’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2263(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Beckham has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
H. R. 5873 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen 

An Act 

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 511 

East San Antonio Avenue in El Paso, Texas, as the ‘‘R.E. Thomason Federal 

Building and United States Courthouse’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The Federal building and United States courthouse located 

at 511 East San Antonio Avenue in El Paso, Texas, shall be known 

and designated as the ‘‘R.E. Thomason Federal Building and United 

States Courthouse’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the Federal building and 

United States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

to be a reference to the ‘‘R.E. Thomason Federal Building and 

United States Courthouse’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.