alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 27

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 24, 1995

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

To grant the consent of the Congress to certain additional

powers conferred upon the Bi-State Development Agency

by the States of Missouri and Illinois.

Whereas the Congress in consenting to the compact between

Missouri and Illinois creating the Bi-State Development

Agency and the Bi-State Metropolitan District provided

that no power shall be exercised by the Bi-State Agency

under the provisions of article III of such compact until

such power has been conferred upon the Bi-State Agency

by the legislatures of the States to the compact and approved by an Act of Congress; and

Whereas such States have now enacted certain legislation in

order to confer certain additional powers on such BiState Development Agency: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That—
2

SJ 27 RFH

1 (a) The consent of the Congress is hereby given to

2 the additional powers conferred on the Bi-State Develop3 ment Agency by Senate Bill 114, Laws of Missouri 1993

4 and Public Act 88–611 (Senate Bill 1670), Laws of Illi5 nois 1994.

6 (b) The powers conferred by the Acts consented to

7 in subsection (a) shall take effect on January 1, 1995.

8 SEC. 2. The provisions of the Act of August 31, 1950

9 (64 Stat. 568) shall apply to the additional powers ap10 proved under this joint resolution to the same extent as

11 if such additional powers were conferred under the provi12 sions of the compact consented to in such Act.

13 SEC. 3. The right to alter, amend, or repeal this joint

14 resolution is expressly reserved.

15 SEC. 4. The right is hereby reserved to the Congress

16 to require the disclosure and furnishings of such informa17 tion or data by the Bi-State Development Agency as is

18 deemed appropriate by the Congress.

Passed the Senate July 21 (legislative day, July 10),

1995.

Attest: KELLY D. JOHNSTON,

Secretary.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 57 (Thursday, March 24, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 16717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05875]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


Notice of Renewal of the Advisory Committee on Commercial Remote 
Sensing

AGENCY: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, and the General Services Administration (GSA) rule on 
Federal Advisory Committee Management, and after consultation with GSA, 
the Secretary of Commerce has determined that the renewal of the 
Advisory Committee on Commercial Remote Sensing (ACCRES) is in the 
public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed on 
the Department by law. ACCRES was last renewed on March 6, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Robinson, Commercial Remote 
Sensing Regulatory Affairs Office, NOAA Satellite and Information 
Services, 1335 East West Highway, Room G101, Silver Spring, Maryland 
20910; telephone (240) 997-2475, email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#91f2e3e2e3f0d1fffef0f0bff6fee7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ee8d9c9d9c8fae80818f8fc0898198">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Committee was first established in May 
2002, to advise the Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and 
Atmosphere on matters relating to the U.S. commercial remote-sensing 
industry and NOAA's activities to carry out the responsibilities of the 
Department of Commerce set forth in the National and Commercial Space 
Programs Act of 2010 (the Act), Title 51 U.S.C. 60101 et seq (formerly 
the Land Remote Sensing Policy Act of 1992, 15 U.S.C. 5621-5625).
    ACCRES will have a fairly balanced membership consisting of 
approximately 10 to 20 members serving in a representative capacity. 
All members should represent the views of a stakeholder organization in 
the remote sensing area, and should have expertise in remote sensing, 
space commerce or a related field. Each candidate member shall be 
recommended by the Assistant Administrator and shall be appointed by 
the Under Secretary for a term of two years at the discretion of the 
Under Secretary.
    The Committee will function solely as an advisory body, and in 
compliance with provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. 
Copies of the Committee's revised Charter have been filed with the 
appropriate committees of the Congress and with the Library of 
Congress.

Stephen M. Volz,
Assistant Administrator for Satellite and Information Services.
[FR Doc. 2022-05875 Filed 3-23-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-HR-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

                       Exhibit 27.2

    Restated Financial Data Schedule - Quarter ended March 31, 1997

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE  OF AVTEL  COMMUNICATIONS,  INC.  AS OF MARCH 31,  1997 AND THE  RELATED
STATEMENTS OF  OPERATIONS  AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4972
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9356
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18855
<PP&E>                                           1502
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20514
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11385
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           86
<OTHER-SE>                                       8150
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20514
<SALES>                                         13971
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13971
<CGS>                                            9477
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9477
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3902
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  5
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   641
<INCOME-TAX>                                      269
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      372
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .04
        



</TABLE>
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 31

To express the sense of the Senate that the Attorney General should act

immediately to protect reproductive health care clinics.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 6 (legislative day, January 5), 1995

Mrs. BOXER (for herself, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. KERRY, Mr.

KENNEDY, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. SIMON, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. DODD,

Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN, Mr.

HARKIN, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. PELL, Mr. CHAFEE, Ms. SNOWE, Mr.

INOUYE, and Mr. BRADLEY) submitted the following resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

To express the sense of the Senate that the Attorney General

should act immediately to protect reproductive health

care clinics.

Whereas there are approximately 900 clinics in the United

States providing reproductive health services;

Whereas violence directed at persons seeking to provide reproductive health services continues to increase in the

United States, as demonstrated by the recent shootings

at two reproductive health clinics in Massachusetts and

another health care clinic in Virginia;

Whereas organizations monitoring clinic violence have recorded over 130 incidents of violence or harassment di-
2

•S RES 31 IS

rected at reproductive health care clinics and their personnel in 1994 such as death threats, stalking, chemical

attacks, bombings and arson;

Whereas there has been one attempted murder in Florida and

four individuals killed at reproductive health care clinics

in Florida and Massachusetts in 1994;

Whereas the Congress passed and the President signed the

Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act of 1994, a

law establishing Federal criminal penalties and civil remedies for certain violent, threatening, obstructive and destructive conduct that is intended to injure, intimidate or

interfere with persons seeking to obtain or provide reproductive health services;

Whereas violence is not a mode of free speech and should not

be condoned as a method of expressing an opinion;

Whereas persons exercising their constitutional rights and

acting completely within the law are entitled to full protection from the Federal Government;

Whereas the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act of

1994 imposes a mandate on the Federal Government to

protect individuals seeking to obtain or provide reproductive health services; and

Whereas the Attorney General has at her disposal law enforcement personnel including 10,000 FBI agents and

over 2000 members of the United States Marshals Service: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the

2 United States Attorney General should fully enforce the

3 law and take any further necessary measures to protect

4 persons seeking to provide or obtain, or assist in providing
3

•S RES 31 IS

1 or obtaining, reproductive health services from violent

2 attack.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<CIK>      0001006282
<NAME>     PICK COMMUNICATIONS CORP.
<CURRENCY> U. S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          98,979
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,443,856
<ALLOWANCES>                                   229,838
<INVENTORY>                                     18,403
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,393,026
<PP&E>                                         127,541
<DEPRECIATION>                                  43,173
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,536,924
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,893,725
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,098
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,510,820)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,536,924
<SALES>                                      2,856,657
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,856,657
<CGS>                                        2,726,444
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,337,815
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,252
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (494,232)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (494,232)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (494,232)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                                   
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LIONEL RUBALCAVA,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

TOM FELKER, Warden, Warden, High

Desert State Prison, Susanville, California,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 10-15791

D.C. No. 4:07-cv-05379-SBA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Saundra B. Armstrong, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted June 10, 2013

San Francisco, California

Before: O’SCANNLAIN and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and PIERSOL, Senior

District Judge.** 

Petitioner Lionel Rubalcava appeals the district court’s denial of his petition

for habeas corpus, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He argues that the

FILED

AUG 07 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, Senior District Judge for the U.S.

District Court for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation.
California Court of Appeals unreasonably applied Crawford v. Washington, 541

U.S. 36 (2004), by rejecting his challenge to testimony at his trial from the state’s

expert witness. 

The state court did not unreasonably apply Crawford. There, the court

squarely stated that “[t]he [Confrontation] Clause [] does not bar the use of

testimonial statements for purposes other than establishing the truth of the matter

asserted.” Crawford, 541 U.S. at 59 n.9. Here, the statements recounted by the

state’s expert were not for the purpose of establishing the truth of the matters

asserted but rather were only admitted to explain the basis of the expert’s

opinions—a fact which was explained to the jury at the time and in the jury

instructions. See, e.g., Fed. R. Evid. 703 (permitting experts to disclose otherwise

inadmissible facts to explain the basis of their opinion if the probative value

outweighs the prejudicial effect). Given his admission that he was a gang member,

Rubalcava was not prejudiced to the extent that the witness may have repeated the

opinions of others as to his membership. In the highly deferential posture

demanded by AEDPA, this was not an unreasonable application of Crawford.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       4,541,740
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,313,999
<ALLOWANCES>                                    37,209
<INVENTORY>                                  4,730,267
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,966,499
<PP&E>                                       5,492,755
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,954,278
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,911,611
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,194,320
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    29,795,612
<OTHER-SE>                                (16,365,260)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,911,611
<SALES>                                      6,595,759
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,595,759
<CGS>                                        3,539,848
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,527,242
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             411,645
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,710,547)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,585
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,643,959)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.41)


</TABLE>
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 20

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That when the Senate recesses or adjourns

3 at the close of business on Thursday, June 29, 1995, or

4 Friday, June 30, 1995, pursuant to a motion made by

5 the Majority Leader or his designee, in accordance with

6 this resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned until 12:00

7 noon on Monday, July 10, 1995, or until such time on

8 that day as may be specified by the Majority Leader or

9 his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until

10 12:00 noon on the second day after Members are notified

11 to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this resolution,

12 whichever occurs first; and that when the House of Rep13 resentatives adjourns on the legislative day of Friday,

14 June 30, 1995, it stand adjourned until 2:00 p.m. on Mon15 day, July 10, 1995, or until 12:00 noon on the second

16 day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to

17 section 2 of this resolution, whichever occurs first.

18 SEC 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the

19 Speaker of the House, acting jointly after consultation
2

SCON 20 ES

1 with the Minority Leader of the Senate and Minority

2 Leader of the House, shall notify the Members of the Sen3 ate and the House, respectively, to reassemble whenever,

4 in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Passed the Senate June 29 (legislative day, June

19), 1995.

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 20

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional recess or adjournment

1995, until Monday, July 10, 1995.House on the legislative day of Friday, June 30,1995, and a conditional adjournment of theFriday, June 30, 1995, until Monday, July 10,of the Senate on Thursday, June 29, 1995, or
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 231

Extending sympathies to the people of Scotland.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 14 (legislative day, MARCH 13), 1996

Mr. WELLSTONE (for himself and Mr. BRADLEY) submitted the following

resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Extending sympathies to the people of Scotland.

Whereas all Americans were horrified by the news this morning that 16 kindergarten children and their teacher were

shot and killed yesterday in Dunblane, Scotland, by an

individual who invaded their school;

Whereas another 12 children and 3 adults were apparently

wounded in the same terrible assault;

Whereas this was an unspeakable tragedy of huge dimensions

causing tremendous feelings of horror and anger and sadness affecting all people around the world; and

Whereas the people of the United States wish to extend their

sympathy to the people of Scotland in their hours of hurt

and pain and grief: Now, therefore, be it
2

SRES 231 ATS

1 Resolved, That the Senate, on behalf of the American

2 people, does extend its condolences and sympathies to the

3 families of the little children and others who were mur4 dered and wounded, and to all the people of Scotland, with

5 fervent hopes and prayers that such an occurrence will

6 never, ever again take place.

Æ
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 191

Designating the month of November 1995 as ‘‘National American Indian

Heritage Month’’, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 1, 1995

Mr. MCCAIN (for himself, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. BENNETT, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr.

BRADLEY, Mr. BREAUX, Mr. BROWN, Mr. BRYAN, Mr. BURNS, Mr.

CAMPBELL, Mr. CHAFEE, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. COHEN, Mr. CONRAD, Mr.

CRAIG, Mr. D’AMATO, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. DODD, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr.

DORGAN, Mr. EXON, Mr. FAIRCLOTH, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mrs. FEINSTEIN,

Mr. GORTON, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. HATCH, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. INOUYE, Mr.

JEFFORDS, Mrs. KASSEBAUM, Mr. KEMPTHORNE, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr.

KERRY, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Ms. MIKULSKI,

Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. NICKLES, Mr. PELL, Mr.

PRESSLER, Mr. REID, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. SIMON, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr.

SPECTER, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. THURMOND, and Mr.

WELLSTONE) submitted the following resolution; which was considered

and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating the month of November 1995 as ‘‘National

American Indian Heritage Month’’, and for other purposes.

Whereas American Indians were the original inhabitants of

the land that now constitutes the United States of America;

Whereas American Indian governments developed the fundamental principles of freedom of speech and separation
2

•SRES 191 ATS

of powers in government, and these principles form the

foundation of the United States Government today;

Whereas American Indian societies have exhibited a respect

for the finiteness of natural resources through deep respect for the earth, and these values continue to be widely held today;

Whereas American Indian people have served with valor in all

wars from the Revolutionary War to the conflict in the

Persian Gulf, often in a percentage well above the percentage of American Indians in the population of the

United States as a whole;

Whereas American Indians have made distinct and important

contributions to America and the rest of the world in

many fields, including agriculture, medicine, music, language, and art;

Whereas American Indians deserve to be recognized for their

individual contributions to American society as artists,

sculptors, musicians, authors, poets, artisans, scientists,

and scholars;

Whereas a resolution and proclamation as requested in this

resolution will encourage self-esteem, pride, and selfawareness in American Indians of all ages; and

Whereas November is traditionally the month when American

Indians have harvested their crops and is generally a

time of celebration and giving thanks: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates November 1995

2 as ‘‘National American Indian Heritage Month’’ and re3 quests that the President issue a proclamation calling on

4 Federal, State, and local governments, interested groups
3

•SRES 191 ATS

1 and organizations, and the people of the United States to

2 observe the month with appropriate programs, ceremonies,

3 and activities.

Æ