alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HSI Asset Corporation Trust
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2006-HE2

Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions to
Certificateholders or 2006

Class      Interest            Principal            Realized           Ending
          Distribution            Paid               Losses            Balance

AIO         476,448.75                0.00            0.00                0.00
IA        1,228,590.88        5,335,394.49            0.00      378,999,605.51
IIA1      1,394,149.05        6,180,905.05            0.00      436,406,094.95
IIA2        410,263.03                0.00            0.00      128,811,000.00
IIA3        723,163.70                0.00            0.00      224,585,000.00
IIA4        207,244.85                0.00            0.00       63,784,000.00
M1          174,004.59                0.00            0.00       53,362,000.00
M10          52,294.64                0.00            0.00       12,197,000.00
M2          155,495.27                0.00            0.00       47,263,000.00
M3           93,788.27                0.00            0.00       28,207,000.00
M4           84,083.93                0.00            0.00       25,156,000.00
M5           76,709.79                0.00            0.00       22,870,000.00
M6           80,230.64                0.00            0.00       23,632,000.00
M7           79,065.44                0.00            0.00       21,345,000.00
M8           59,987.90                0.00            0.00       14,484,000.00
M9           35,950.69                0.00            0.00        8,385,000.00
P           115,382.84                0.00            0.00              100.00
R                 0.00                0.00            0.00                0.00
X         4,464,349.07                0.00            0.00       23,631,835.97
OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

67) ll-K- (B) -55 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

p.i 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:50 AM Sheet 67 of 325 
P.2 

W a 

II-K-(B)-55 

REVISED FGD AND PARTICULATE CONTROL CAPITAL AND 

OPERATING COSTS. 

Letter from T. Hogan, EEA to R. Short, EPArSASD. 

August 26, 1980. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(B)-55
#### Starsha M. SEWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David WAGNER, Esq., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-2137

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 25, 2018

Decided: January 30, 2018

Starsha M. Sewell, Appellant Pro Se.

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

*118Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Starsha M. Sewell appeals the district court’s orders dismissing this action for failure to state a claim and denying her motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Sewell v. Wagner,*No. 8:16-cv-02458-GJH, 2016 WL 4051717, 2016 WL 10688817 (D. Md. July 27, Aug. 29, and Sept. 18, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
IV

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 22

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 6, 1995

Referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas there was international concern expressed at the Rio

Conference of 1992 about conservation of the seas;

Whereas 1998 has been declared the ‘‘International Year of

the Ocean’’ by the United Nations in an effort to alert

the world to the need for improving the physical and cultural assets offered by the world’s oceans;

Whereas the theme of Expo ’98 is ‘‘The Oceans, a Heritage

for the Future’’;

Whereas Expo ’98 has a fundamental aim of alerting political, economic, and public opinion to the growing importance of the world’s oceans;

Whereas Portugal has established a vast network of relationships through ocean exploration;

Whereas Portugal’s history is rich with examples of the courage and exploits of Portuguese explorers;
2

SCON 22 RFH

Whereas Portugal and the United States have a relationship

based on mutual respect, and a sharing of interests and

ideals, particularly the deeply held commitment to democratic values;

Whereas today over 2,000,000 Americans can trace their ancestry to Portugal; and

Whereas the United States and Portugal agreed in the 1995

Agreement on Cooperation and Defense that in 1998 the

2 countries would consider and develop appropriate

means of commemorating the upcoming quincentennial

anniversary of the historic voyage of discovery by Vasco

da Gama: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That the United States should fully partici3 pate in Expo ’98 in Lisbon, Portugal, and encourage the

4 private sector to support this worthwhile undertaking.

Passed the Senate September 5, 1995.

Attest: KELLY D. JOHNSTON,

Secretary.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brent Renard CHRISTIAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6859

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 16, 2017

Decided: December 7, 2017

Brent Renard Christian, Appellant Pro Se, Robert Michael Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Brent Renard Christian seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012), A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2263(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, 'a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Christian has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and .legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Exhibit 10.7


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
California Steel Industries, Inc.:

We consent to the use in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Companhia Vale do
Rio Doce of our report dated January 21, 2002 relating to the consolidated
financial statements (not presented separately herein) of California Steel
Industries, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and for each
of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2001.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Orange County, California
June 27, 2002
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Offir MOSQUERA, also known as Ofir Mosquera Carvajal, also known as Nancy Torres, also known as Nancy Carson, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40283 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 20, 2017

*259Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Offir Mosquera, Pro Se

Before JONES, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges,

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Offir Mosquera has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mosquera has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 39 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 39

  To provide for the appointment of Howard H. Baker, Jr. as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 24, 1995

Mr. Moynihan (for himself, Mr. Cochran, and Mr. Simpson) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
                 Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  To provide for the appointment of Howard H. Baker, Jr. as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the 
Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other 
than Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the expiration of the 
term of Jeannine Smith Clark of the District of Columbia on August 25, 
1995, is filled by the appointment of Howard H. Baker, Jr. of the 
District of Columbia. The appointment is for a term of six years and 
shall take effect on the date on which this joint resolution becomes 
law.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.1
   CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
   In
connection with this Annual Report of Maxlife Fund Corp. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the year ending August 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bennett Kurtz, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the
best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1. Such
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending August 31, 2008, fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
  2. The
information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year ending
August 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Maxlife Fund Corp..
  Dated:
December 15, 2008
  MAXLIFE
FUND CORP.
  By:/s/
Bennett Kurtz
 Bennett
Kurtz
 Chief
Executive Officer and
 Chief
Financial Office
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 149 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 149

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the recent announcement by 
     the Republic of France that it intends to conduct a series of 
 underground nuclear test explosions despite the current international 
                     moratorium on nuclear testing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 12 (legislative day, July 10), 1995

Mr. Akaka submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the recent announcement by 
     the Republic of France that it intends to conduct a series of 
 underground nuclear test explosions despite the current international 
                     moratorium on nuclear testing.
Whereas the President of France stated on June 13, 1995, that the Republic of 
        France plans to conduct 8 nuclear test explosions over the next several 
        months;
Whereas the United States, France, Russia, and Great Britain have observed a 
        moratorium on nuclear testing since 1992;
Whereas a resumption of testing by the Republic of France could result in the 
        disintegration of the current testing moratorium and a renewal of 
        underground testing by other nuclear weapon states;
Whereas a resumption of nuclear testing raises serious environmental and health 
        concerns;
Whereas the United Nations Conference on Disarmament presently is meeting in 
        Geneva, Switzerland, for the purpose of negotiating a Comprehensive 
        Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), which would halt permanently the 
        practice of conducting nuclear test explosions; and
Whereas the announcement by the President of France severely undermines the 
        efforts of the international community to conclude a CTBT by 1996, a 
        goal endorsed by 175 nations, including France and the United States, at 
        the recently completed NPT Extension and Review Conference (the 
        conference for the extension and review of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation 
        Treaty): Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the Republic of 
France should abide by the current international moratorium on nuclear 
test explosions, refrain from proceeding with its announced intention 
of conducting a series of nuclear tests in advance of a Comprehensive 
Test Ban Treaty, and initiate preparations to close its underground 
test sites at the Moruroa and Fangataufa atolls.
                                 <all>
```
JK

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 18-0218

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

RANDY LEE TYER,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for an extension of time, and good 

cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including 

April 6, 2020, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

March 6 2020

03/06/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0218
# EUR-Lex - 32003D0885 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32003D0885

**2003/885/EC: Council Decision of 17 November 2003 concerning the conclusion of the Agreement on the application of certain Community acts on the territory of the Principality of Monaco **

*
Official Journal L 332 , 19/12/2003 P. 0041 - 0041 *

Council Decision

of 17 November 2003

concerning the conclusion of the Agreement on the application of certain Community acts on the territory of the Principality of Monaco

(2003/885/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community and in particular Article 133 in conjunction with Article 300(3), first subparagraph thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas:

(1) The Commission has negotiated on behalf of the Community an Agreement on the application of certain Community acts on the territory of the Principality of Monaco.

(2) Certain tasks for implementation have been attributed to the Joint Committee established under the Agreement, and in particular the power to amend certain aspects of the annexes thereto.

(3) The appropriate internal procedures should be established to ensure the proper functioning of the Agreement and it is necessary to empower the Commission to agree to certain amendments to the Agreement and to take certain decisions for its implementation.

(4) The Agreement should be approved,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Agreement between the European Community and the Principality of Monaco on the application of certain Community acts on the territory of the Principality of Monaco is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.

The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision.

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign, on behalf of the Community, the Agreement referred to in Article 1 in order to bind the Community. The President of the Council or his designate(s) shall, on behalf of the Community, notify to Monaco the completion of the procedures as provided for in Article 6(1) of the Agreement.

Article 3

1. The Community shall be represented by the Commission on the Joint Committee set up under Article 3 of the Agreement.

2. The position to be taken by the Community in the Committee shall be determined by the Council on a proposal by the Commission; the Council shall act by the same voting rule as that applicable for the adoption of the Community act concerned.

3. By derogation to paragraph 2, the Commission shall adopt the Community's position on decisions concerning the addition of Community acts to the Annex of the Agreement, when the acts in question amend acts already contained therein.

Done at Brussels, 17 November 2003.

For the Council

The President

F. Frattini
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 152 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 152

 To amend the Standing Rules of the Senate to require a clause in each 
  bill and resolution to specify the constitutional authority of the 
            Congress for enactment, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 17 (legislative day, July 10), 1995

 Mr. Abraham (for himself, Mr. Dole, Mr. Brown, Mr. Hatch, Mr. DeWine, 
Mr. Kyl, and Mr. Kempthorne) submitted the following resolution; which 
       was referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To amend the Standing Rules of the Senate to require a clause in each 
  bill and resolution to specify the constitutional authority of the 
            Congress for enactment, and for other purposes.
    Resolved,

SECTION 1. CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY.

    This resolution is approved pursuant to the powers granted to the 
Senate under Article I, section 5, clause 2 of the United States 
Constitution.

SEC. 2. CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY CLAUSE IN LEGISLATION.

    The Standing Rules of the Senate are amended by adding at the end 
thereof the following:

                              ``RULE XLIV

            ``constitutional authority clause in legislation

    ``1. (a) A constitutional authority clause shall follow the 
enacting clause of any bill or the resolving clause of any joint 
resolution. The constitutional authority clause shall be in the 
following form (with appropriate modifications and appropriate matter 
inserted in the blanks):
    ```This Act (or resolution) is enacted pursuant to the power(s) 
granted to the Congress under Article(s) __________ section(s) 
__________, clause(s) __________ of the United States Constitution.'''.
    ``(b) A similar clause shall precede the first title, section, 
subsection, or paragraph and each following title, section, subsection, 
or paragraph to the extent the later title, section, subsection, or 
paragraph relies on a different article, section, or clause of the 
Constitution from the one pursuant to which the first title, section, 
subsection or paragraph is enacted.
    ``2. It shall not be in order for the Senate to consider any bill, 
joint resolution, amendment, motion, or conference report that does not 
comply with the provisions of paragraph (1), on the objection of any 
Senator.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32

   CERTIFICATIONS OF JOSEPH R. ROZELLE, PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
     PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER, PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of China Growth
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, the undersigned officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  October 15, 2007                  /s/ Joseph R. Rozelle
                                         --------------------------
                                         JOSEPH R. ROZELLE
                                         Principal Executive Officer
                                         and Principal Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the
Form 10-K pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being
filed as part of the Form 10-K for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference
into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.