alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000



<S>                             <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999

<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1999

<CASH>                                          79,625

<SECURITIES>                                         0

<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,166

<ALLOWANCES>                                         0

<INVENTORY>                                          0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0

<PP&E>                                         311,267

<DEPRECIATION>                                       0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 533,023

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0

<BONDS>                                        371,500

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0

<PREFERRED>                                          0

<COMMON>                                            29

<OTHER-SE>                                      99,264

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   533,023

<SALES>                                              0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,958

<CGS>                                                0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0

<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,990

<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    968

<INCOME-TAX>                                       217

<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                751

<DISCONTINUED>                                       0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0

<CHANGES>                                            0

<NET-INCOME>                                       751

<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.98

<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.98




</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 24

- 00176

- CR Genevieve Pauline GOLDEN , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 399th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2022CR11545 Honorable Andrew Carruthers , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Delivered and Filed: June 12, 2024
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION Appellant, acting pro se , filed a notice of appeal on February 28, 2024 , purporting to appeal from a conviction and sentence imposed on October 7, 202 2

. Thereafter, the trial court clerk filed the clerk’s record. The clerk’s record does not contain a final judgment of conviction. “With certain exceptions . . . , this court has jurisdicti on to consider an appeal filed by a criminal defendant only after a final judgment of conviction.” Zamarripa v. State , No. 04

- 16

- 00274

- CR, 2016 WL 3085932, at *1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio June 1, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (cit ing T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC

. art. 44.02); accord McKown v. State ,04

- 24

- 00176

- CR

- 2

- 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 1996, no pet.) (“Generally, we only have jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal defendant where there has been a judgment of conviction.”).
O n April 11, 2024, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant did not respond. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC

. art. 4 4.02; McKown , 915 S.W.2d 161; Zamarripa , 2016 WL 3085932, at *1.

PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6376 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the energy efficient 

commercial buildings deduction, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2016 

Mr. REICHERT (for himself, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. REED, and Mr. VAN

HOLLEN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify 

the energy efficient commercial buildings deduction, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF ENERGY EFFICIENT COM4 MERCIAL BUILDINGS DEDUCTION. 

5 (a) ALLOCATIONS OF DEDUCTIONS.—Paragraph (4) 

6 of section 179D(d) of such Code is amended to read as 

7 follows: 

8 ‘‘(4) ALLOCATION OF DEDUCTION FOR CERTAIN

9 PROPERTY.— 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6376 IH

1 ‘‘(A) PROPERTY HELD BY GOVERNMENTS

2 AND NONPROFITS.—In the case of energy effi3 cient commercial building property installed on 

4 or in property owned by a Federal, State, local, 

5 or Indian tribal government, or a political sub6 division thereof, or by an organization that is 

7 described in section 501(c)(3) and exempt from 

8 tax under section 501(a), the Secretary shall 

9 promulgate a regulation to allow the allocation 

10 of the deduction to the person primarily respon11 sible for designing the property in lieu of the 

12 owner of such property. Such person shall be 

13 treated as the taxpayer for purposes of this sec14 tion. 

15 ‘‘(B) ALLOCATIONS TO PARTNERSHIPS

16 AND S CORPORATIONS.—In the case of an allo17 cation of a deduction under this section to a 

18 partnership or S corporation, the Secretary 

19 shall by regulation or other guidance allow the 

20 full benefit of a deduction allocated under this 

21 paragraph at the partner or shareholder level.’’. 

22 (b) LOW-INCOME HOUSING EXCEPTION TO BASIS

23 REDUCTION.—Subsection (e) of section 179D of such 

24 Code is amended by inserting ‘‘(other than property placed 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6376 IH

1 in service in a qualified low-income building (within the 

2 meaning of section 42))’’ after ‘‘building property’’. 

3 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

4 (1) The heading for section 179D of such Code 

5 is amended by inserting ‘‘AND MULTIFAMILY’’ 

6 after ‘‘COMMERCIAL’’. 

7 (2) The item in the table of sections for part 

8 VI of subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code relat9 ing to section 179D of such Code is amended by in10 serting ‘‘and multifamily’’ after ‘‘commercial’’. 

11 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

13 December 31, 2016. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of FFD Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert R. Gerber, the Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Robert R. Gerber
------------------------------------------
Robert R. Gerber
Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2008
Opinion issued March 3, 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 15
- 00644
- CR

——————————— RIGOBERTO MONRROY , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 228th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 1445254

MEMORANDUM OPINION A jury found a ppellant, Rigoberto Monrroy, guilty of the felony offense of possession with an intent to deliver a controlled substance , namely, cocaine,2

weighing more than one gram and less t han four grams

. 1 T he trial court assessed his punishment at confinement for four years. Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal. Counsel for appellant has filed a motion to withdraw the appeal. The motion is signed by counsel and includes a copy of a letter from appellant to which the motion refers. The letter is signed by appellant and expressly states that he no longer wish es to go forward with the appeal and asks counsel to terminate the appeal as soon as possible

. We construe the motion as a motion to dismiss the appeal and conclude that it substantially complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a). See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 42.2(a). We have not issued a decision in the appea l,
and more than ten days have passed and the State has not responded or otherwise expressed opposition to the motion. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 10.3(a), 42.2(a). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 43.2(f). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Massengale, and Huddle. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2( b).

1 T EX
. H EALTH & S AFETY C ODE A NN
. § § 481.102( 3 ) (D) , 481.112(a), (b) (Vernon 2010 ).
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Vogtsberger, 127 Ohio St.3d 1261, 2010-Ohio-6588.]

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. VOGTSBERGER. 

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Vogtsberger, 

127 Ohio St.3d 1261, 2010-Ohio-6588.] 

(No. 2008-0397 — Submitted December 3, 2010 — Decided December 10, 2010.) 

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 

__________________ 

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 

application for reinstatement by respondent, Thomas Henry Vogtsberger, 

Attorney Registration No. 0023305, last known business address in Rossford, 

Ohio. 

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of September 17, 2008, 

wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a 

period of two years with one year stayed, finds that respondent has substantially 

complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). 

Therefore, 

{¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the 

practice of law in the state of Ohio. It is further ordered that respondent will serve 

a monitored probationary period of one year. 

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that on or before 30 days from the date of this 

order, relator shall file with the Clerk of this court the name of the attorney who 

will serve as respondent's monitor, in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(9). It is 

further ordered that at the end of respondent's probationary period, relator shall 

file with the Clerk of this court a report indicating whether respondent, during the 

probationary period, complied with the terms of the probation. 

{¶ 5} It is further ordered that at the end of the probationary period, 

respondent may apply for termination of probation as provided in Gov.Bar R. 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

2 

V(9). It is further ordered that respondent's probation shall not be terminated until 

(1) respondent files an application for termination of probation in compliance 

with Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D), (2) respondent complies with this and all other orders 

issued by this court, (3) respondent complies with the Rules for the Government 

of the Bar of Ohio, (4) relator files with the Clerk of this court a report indicating 

that respondent has complied with the terms of the probation, and (5) this court 

orders that the probation be terminated. 

{¶ 6} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified 

copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be 

made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the 

costs of publication. 

{¶ 7} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Vogtsberger, 119 

Ohio St.3d 458, 2008-Ohio-4571, 895 N.E.2d 158. 

 BROWN, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR,

O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. 

______________________
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL AND EXECUTIVE FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Compass Acquisition Corporation (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Rozelle, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: October 7, 2009



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Joseph Rozelle                                                  
|Joseph Rozelle
President
(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 24 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 24

  Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a dedication 
ceremony incident to the placement of a bust of Raoul Wallenberg in the 
                                Capitol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               August 10 (legislative day, July 10), 1995

    Mr. Pell (for himself, Mr. Stevens, and Mr. Ford) submitted the 
following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                        Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a dedication 
ceremony incident to the placement of a bust of Raoul Wallenberg in the 
                                Capitol.
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. DEDICATION CEREMONY AND PLACEMENT OF A BUST OF RAOUL 
              WALLENBERG IN THE CAPITOL.

    The rotunda of the Capitol may be used on November 2, 1995, for a 
ceremony incident to the placement of a bust of Raoul Wallenberg in the 
Capitol as previously authorized by Congress.

SEC. 2. SECURITY AND PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall take such action with respect to 
security as may be necessary to carry out section 1. The Architect of 
the Capitol shall make appropriate physical preparations for the 
ceremony referred to in section 1.
                                 <all>
```
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 40583 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
DARWIN JOSE RAUDA

- BONILLA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:17

- CR

- 113

- 1

Before REAVLEY , CLEMENT, and H O, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Darwin Jose Rauda

Bonilla has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rauda

- Bonilla h a s not fi led a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 20 , 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-40583 Document: 00514354410 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/20/2018No. 17

- 40583

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-40583 Document: 00514354410 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/20/2018
Exhibit 21.1
 List of Subsidiaries
 Entity
    
    JurisdictionCornerstone Healthcare Plus Operating Partnership, L.P.
    
    DelawareCGI Healthcare Operating Partnership, L.P.
    
    DelawareCGI Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P.
    
    DelawareCGI Retail Operating Partnership, L.P.
    
    DelawareMaster HC TRS, LLC
    
    DelawareCaruth Haven TRS, LLC
    
    DelawareCaruth Haven GP, LLC
    
    DelawareCaruth Haven, L.P.
    
    DelawareThe Oaks Bradenton TRS, LLC
    
    DelawareThe Oaks Bradenton, LLC
    
    DelawareGreenTree Acquisition TRS, LLC
    
    DelawareGreenTree Acquisition, LLC
    
    DelawareMVI Health Center GP, LLC
    
    DelawareMVI Health Center, L.P.
    
    DelawareFloral Vale, LLC
    
    DelawareFloral Vale TRS LLC
    
    DelawareHilliard ALF TRS LLC
    
    DelawareHilliard ALF LLC
    
    DelawareRoyal Cornerstone South Carolina Portfolio LLC
    
    DelawareRoyal Cornerstone South Carolina Tenant Portfolio LLC
    
    DelawareRSC Oakleaf Lexington, LLC
    
    FloridaRSC Oakleaf Greenville, LLC
    
    FloridaCornerstone Oakleaf Village LLC
    
    DelawareCornerstone Oakleaf Village TRS LLC
    
    DelawareMeridian Rehab Littleton, LLC
    
    DelawareChattanooga ALF, LLC
    
    DelawareChattanooga ALF TRS, LLC
    
    DelawareCornerstone Rome LTH Partnership, LLC
    
    DelawareCornerstone Dallas Rehab GP LLC
    
    DelawareCornerstone Dallas Rehab LP
    
    DelawareHedgcoxe MOB GP LLC
    
    DelawareHedgcoxe MOB, LP
    
    Delaware
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Candev Resource Exploration, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the year ended October 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Mark McLeary, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Date:  January 25, 2008 | /s/ Mark McLeary
Mark McLeary
Chief Financial Officer
|----------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Candev Resource Exploration, Inc. and will be retained by Candev Resource Exploration, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Homeland Security Capital Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,            2009, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|         | HOMELAND SECURITY CAPITAL CORPORATION |
|--------------|---------------------------------------|
|         |                                  |   |
|         |                                  |   |
|         |                                  |   |
| May 15, 2009 | By:                                   | /s/ C. Thomas McMillen |
|         | Name:                                 | C. Thomas McMillen |
|         | Title:                                | Chief Executive Officer |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Homeland Security Capital Corporation            and will be retained by Homeland Security Capital Corporation and furnished to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.