alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
420 P.2d 587

#### STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Arnold Louis FARNHAM, Appellant.

No. 2 CA-CR 54.

Court of Appeals of Arizona.

Dec. 7, 1966.

Darrell F. Smith, Atty. Gen., William J. Schafer, III, Pima County Atty., William J. Augustine, Deputy Pima County Atty., Tucson, for appellee.

R. Lamar Couser, Tucson, for appellant.

KRUCKER, Chief Judge.

Arnold Louis Farnham was convicted in the Superior Court of Pima County, Arizona, on December 6, 1965, by a jury, of the crimes of burglary in violation of A.R. S. § 13-302, and breaking into a coin-operated contrivance in violation of A.R.S. § 13-676, and was sentenced to two concurrent terms in the Arizona State Prison. Defendant broke into the Firestone Store at the corner of North Sixth Avenue and East Sixth Street in Tucson, Arizona, through a skylight in the roof. After entering, he broke into a soft-drink machine and took change out of it. Defendant was discovered by the police while on the roof of the store, after the crimes were committed. The defendant was represented by court-appointed counsel at all times.

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel for this appeal has filed an affidavit in this Court stating that he has examined the record and finds no valid nor legitimate grounds upon which to base an appeal and can find no error in the record, requesting that the matter be submitted to the Court upon the record.

*345 In accordance with the mandate of A.R.S. § 13-1715, subsec. B and the numerous cases applying the.doctrine that an appellate court must search the record for fundamental error in all criminal appeals, this Court has examined the entire record and, after doing so, we are compelled to agree with appellant’s counsel that the record discloses no error and, therefore, hold that no error or violation of any of the appellant’s rights occurred during the proceedings in the lower court and that no basis exists upon which an appeal can he based. State v. Burrell, 96 Ariz. 233, 393 P.2d 921 (1964) ; State v. Denmon, 3 Ariz. App. 217, 413 P.2d 276 (1966); State v. White, 2 Ariz.App. 455, 409 P.2d 739 (1966).

The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

HATHAWAY and MOLLOY, JJ., concur.
H L


SERVICES


**FORM
      OF ITEM 1123 CERTIFICATION OF SERVICER**





Merrill
      Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc.


250
      Vesey
      Street


4
      World
      Financial Center, 10th Floor


New
      York,
      New York 10080





LaSalle
      Bank National Association


135
      South
      LaSalle Street


Suite
      1511


Chicago,
      Illinois 60603


Attention:  Global
      Securities and Trust Services - First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust, Series
      2006-FF18





Re:
            Pooling
                and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated as of December 1,2006,
                among Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc., as depositor, Home
                Loan
                Services, Inc. f/k/a National City Home Loan Services, Inc., as servicer,
                and LaSalle Bank National Association, as trustee, relating to First
                Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates,
                Series 2006-FF18




I,
      Steven
      A. Baranet, Vice President of Home Loan Services, Inc. f/k/a National City
      Home
      Loan Services, Inc. (the "Servicer"), hereby certify that:





(1)  A
      review
      of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding calendar year and of
      the
      performance of the Servicer under the Agreement has been made under my
      supervision; and





(2)  To
      the
      best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all
      its
      obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such year
      or
      a portion thereof, or, if there has been a failure to fulfill any such
      obligation in any material respect, I have specified below each such failure
      known to me and the nature and status thereof.




March
      1,
      2007





Home
      Loan
      Services, Inc.,


f/k/a
      National City Home Loan Services, Inc.


as
      Servicer




/s/
      Steven A. Baranet  Steven
      A.
      Baranet


Vice
      President




**Loan
      Services**


P.O.
      Box
      1838


Pittsburgh,
      PA 15230-1838




Home
                Loan Services is a subsidiary
              of
                Merrill Lynch Bank and Trust Co., FSB
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6347 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6347

  To extend for one year the program for priority review to encourage 
                treatments for rare pediatric diseases.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 17, 2016

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend for one year the program for priority review to encourage 
                treatments for rare pediatric diseases.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF PROGRAM FOR PRIORITY REVIEW TO ENCOURAGE 
              TREATMENTS FOR RARE PEDIATRIC DISEASES.

    Section 529(b)(5) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 
U.S.C. 360ff(b)(5)) is amended by striking ``December 31, 2016'' and 
inserting ``December 31, 2017''.
                                 <all>
```
### V •'•iSPORTATjo;
.
r t d / ! O j r5 0
February13 , 201 2 Docke t Managemen t Facilit y U.S
. Departmen t o fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenu e S E Wes t Buildin g Groun d Floor , Roo m W12-14 0 Washington , D

C 2059 0 Ref : Su n Countr ySlo t Exemptio n - Docke t Numbe rFAA-2012-008 9 Ladie s an d Gentlemen , Su n Countr yAirline s ha s requeste d a n exemptio n fro m th e slo t limi t fo rRonal d Reaga n Washingto n Nationa l Airpor t (DCA) se t fort h i n §93.123(a) , t o permi t th e FA At o creat e ai rcarrie rslot s durin g certai n limite d hour s fo r Su n Country' s use . Th e propose d ai rcarrie rslot s woul d replac e tw o slo t exemption s unde rDO TOrde r2010-12-1 6 awarde d t o Su n Country
. O n January6 , 2012 , th e Unite d State s Cour t o fAppeal s fo rth e Distric t o fColumbi a Circui t vacate d th e DO TOrder , an d Su n Countr ywil l los e it s existin g servic e betwee n DC Aan d Lansing' s Capita l Regio n Internationa l Airport
. Specfically , Su n Coutr ydesire s on e dail yslo t durin g eac h o fth e 100 0 an d 110 0 hours
. Th e propose d exemptio n woul d permi t Su a Countr yt o continu e operatin g it s existin g service s an d avoi d a n inequitabl e resul t o fth e Court' s order
. I an d man yo fth e employee s o fDemme rCorporatio n rel yo n Su n Courty' s direc t servic e t o Ronal d Reaga n Washingto n Nationa l Airpor t fo rfrequen t trip s betwee n Lansin g an d DC
. Th e Su n Countr yDC

Aservic e i s essentia l t o th e economi cgrowt h o fth e Greate rLansin g Region
. Th e dail yservic e i s th e onl ylarg e aircraf t (737-800 ) servic e t o Washingto n Reaga n Airport , i n th e stat e o fMichiga n outsid e o f Detroit
. Prio rt o Su n Country , th e regiona l communit yha d requeste d th e introductio n o fthi s servic e fro m numerou s othe rairlin e operator s withou t success . Accordingly , i t i s critica l tha t th e FA Atak e th e necessar

ystep s t o ensur e th e continuatio n o fth e Su n Countr yslot s a t th e establishe d fligh t time s i n suppor t o fGreate rLansing' s buisnes s an d economi cgrowth
. You rimmediat e approva l o fthi s exemption , s o tha t Su n Countr yca n begi n t o ente rfligh t schedule s fo rsal e fo rth e balanc e o f2012 , wil l b e greatl yappreciated
. Sincerely , DEMME R CORPORATIO N 

# (i>'mV5:^:^^MK...d< _ Willia m A
. Demme r President/CE O

160 0 Nort h Larc h • Lansing , Michiga n Tel : 517-321-360 0 • Fax : 517-321-744 9
# Official Journal L 355/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 355 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6326 October 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 355

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6326 October 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2020/1555 of 22 October 2020 appointing a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2020 to 20 September 2025 | 1 |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1556 of 23 October 2020 amending Decision 2010/638/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Republic of Guinea | 3 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2020/1555 of 22 October 2020 appointing a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2020 to 20 September 2025

1

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1556 of 23 October 2020 amending Decision 2010/638/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Republic of Guinea

3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
NARUC

- FERC Joint Forum Reliability and the Environment Clean Water Act Section 316(b)

California’s Once

- Through

- Cooling Policy

Karen Edson
Vice President, Policy and Client Services

February 5, 20132 

### ISO local capacity

areas and once

through

- cooling plants

Caveat

LA Basin number includes 2,246 MW of capacity at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station currently subject to an extended outage

.

### Los Angeles Basin and San Diego local capacity areas

3 Caveat

The San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station is currently subject to an extended outage

. Map does not reflect 2,200 MW of OTC capacity in LADWP’s balancing authority area.4 

### Growing need for flexibility starts in 2015
# C_2018398EN.01000601.xml

| 5.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1 November 2018

(2018/C 398/10)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1393 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,52 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4604 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88173 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3158 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1430 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 137,90 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5150 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,879 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 322,96 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3269 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6640 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,3245 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5857 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4904 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,9293 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7190 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5701 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 285,70 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,6021 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9046 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4360 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 192,30 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7674 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,642 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 74,8346 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,529 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,2078 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,9917 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 83,6800 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1393

JPY

Japanese yen

128,52

DKK

Danish krone

7,4604

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88173

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3158

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1430

ISK

Iceland króna

137,90

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5150

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,879

HUF

Hungarian forint

322,96

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3269

RON

Romanian leu

4,6640

TRY

Turkish lira

6,3245

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5857

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4904

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,9293

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7190

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5701

KRW

South Korean won

1 285,70

ZAR

South African rand

16,6021

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9046

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4360

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 192,30

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7674

PHP

Philippine peso

60,642

RUB

Russian rouble

74,8346

THB

Thai baht

37,529

BRL

Brazilian real

4,2078

MXN

Mexican peso

22,9917

INR

Indian rupee

83,6800

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### Svetlana TYSHKEVICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as Trustee ON BEHALF OF HARBOR VIEW MORTGAGE LOAN PASS-THROUGH TRUST CERTIFICATES SERIES 2006-12; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-16592

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed December 21, 2017

Svetlana Tyshkevieh, Pro Se

Ruby J. Chavez, Gwen Heather Ribar, Esquire, Attorney, Jonathan D. Fink, Attorney, Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP, Newport Beach, CA, for Defendants-Appellees Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., National Default Servicing Corporation

Ruby J. Chavez, Gwen Heather Ribar, Esquire, Attorney, Wright, Finlay *&*Zak, LLP, Newport Beach, CA, for Defendant-Appellee Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.

William Guy Malcolm, Brian S. Thomley, Malcolm & Cisneros, A Law Corporation, Irvine, CA, for Defendant-Appellee Bank of New York Mellon

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Svetlana Tyshkevieh appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing her action alleging federal and state law claims related to her mortgage loans. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a denial of leave to amend. *Rich v. Shrader,*823 F.3d 1205, 1208 (9th Cir. 2016). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying leave to amend because amendment of Tyshkevich’s claims would have been futile. *See AmerisourceBergen Corp. v. Dialysist W., Inc.,*465 F.3d 946, 951 (9th Cir. 2006) (setting forth standard of review and explaining that leave to amend can be denied if amendment would be futile); *see also*15 U.S.C. § 1635(f) (providing a right of rescission within three years of the date of the consummation of a loan if the lender fails to make required disclosures to the borrower); *Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.,*— U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 790, 792, 190 L.Ed.2d 650 (2015) (a borrower may exercise right of rescission by notifying the lender of borrower’s intent to rescind within three years after the transaction is consummated); *Miguel v. Country Funding Corp.,*309 F.3d 1161, 1164 (9th Cir. 2002) (“[Section] 1635(f) is a statute of repose, depriving the courts of subject matter jurisdiction when a § 1635 claim is brought outside the three-year limitation period.”).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in granting judicial notice because the documents were matters of public record. *See Lee v. City of Los Angeles,*250 F.3d 668, 689 (9th Cir. 2001) (court may *340take judicial notice of matters of public record).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EX-35 (a)
(logo) Bank of America

Bank of America
475 CrossPoint Parkway
PO Box 9000
Getzville, NY 14068-9000

Annual Statement as to Compliance
BAFC 2006-J

I, H. Randall Chestnut, Senior Vice President of Bank of America, N.A., (the
"Servicer"), hereby certify as pursuant to section 2.17 of the Servicing
Agreement between Banc of America Funding Corporation (together with its
permitted successors and assigns, the "Depositor") and Bank of America National
Association, as Servicer (together with its permitted successors and assigns,
the "Servicer"), and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer (together with
its permitted successors and assigns, the "Master Servicer") and as securities
administrator (together with its permitted successors and assigns, in such
capacity, the "Securities Administrator"), and U.S. Bank National Association,
as Trustee ( together with its permitted successors and assigns, the "Trustee")
that: (a) a review of the activities during the 2006 calendar year under this
Agreement has been made under my supervision and (b) to the best of my
knowledge, based on such review, Bank of America, N.A. has fulfilled all of its
obligations under this Agreement throughout the 2006 calendar year.

March 1, 2007


Bank of America, N.A.
as Servicer

By: /s/ H. Randall Chestnut
Name:  H. Randall Chestnut
Title: Senior Vice President
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Euro Group of Companies, Inc.
(formerly ICT Technologies, Inc.), a Delaware corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Chief
Executive Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

          (1)  The Report of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
               section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


                                            /s/  Vasilios Koutsobinas
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Vasilios Koutsobinas
                                                 Chief Executive Officer

November 25, 2009
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LIONEL RUBALCAVA, Petitioner - Appellant,
v. TOM FELKER, Warden, Warden, High Desert State Prison, Susanville, California, Respondent - Appellee. No. 10-15791 D.C. No. 4:07-cv-05379-SBA
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Saundra B. Armstrong, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted June 10, 2013 San Francisco, California Before: O’SCANNLAIN and HURWITZ, Ci rcuit Judges, and PIERSOL, Senior District Judge. ** Petitioner Lionel Rubalcava appeals the di strict court’s denial of his petition for habeas corpus, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He argues that the 

# FILED
AUG 07 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, Senior District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation.California Court of Appeals unreasonably applied Crawford v. Washington , 541 U.S. 36 (2004), by rejecting his challenge to testimony at his trial from the state’s expert witness. The state court did not unreasonably apply Crawford . There, the court squarely stated that “[t]he [Confronta tion] Clause [] does not bar the use of testimonial statements for purposes other than establishing the truth of the matter asserted.” Crawford , 541 U.S. at 59 n.9. Here, the statements recounted by the state’s expert were not for the purpose of establishing the truth of the matters asserted but rather were only admitted to explain the basis of the expert’s opinions—a fact which was explained to the jury at the time and in the jury instructions. See, e.g. , Fed. R. Evid. 703 (permitting experts to disclose otherwise inadmissible facts to explain the basis of their opinion if the probative value outweighs the prejudicial effect). Given his admission that he was a gang member, Rubalcava was not prejudiced to the extent that the witness may have repeated the opinions of others as to his membership. In the highly deferential posture demanded by AEDPA, this was not an unreasonable application of Crawford
. AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
consolidated  balance sheet and the consolidated  statement of operations and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1998
<CASH>                                         446,402
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,257,337
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    11,638,968
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               16,433,763
<PP&E>                                         8,933,758
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 34,367,914
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          9,048,835
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       4,196
<OTHER-SE>                                     16,151,476
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   34,367,914
<SALES>                                        10,199,819
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               10,199,819
<CGS>                                          8,453,357
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,681,833
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (20,382)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             315,263
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (230,252)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (87,151)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (143,101)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (143,101)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.04)
        

</TABLE>