alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A0106. CRAIG L. JONES v. THE STATE.

In 2012, Craig Jones pled guilty to battery, criminal trespass, and aggravated

stalking.

1

In 2017, Jones, a prison inmate, attempted to file a “Petition for Under the

Hague Convention Title 18 § 1781 [sic].” The trial court construed the petition as a

proposed civil action and denied filing of the petition under OCGA § 9-15-2 (d), on

the ground that it showed a complete absence of any justiciable issue of law or fact. 

Jones then filed a notice of appeal to Supreme Court, which transferred the appeal to

this Court. We lack jurisdiction.

Because Jonesis incarcerated, his appeal is controlled by the Prison Litigation

Reform Act of 1996, OCGA § 42-12-1 et seq. Under OCGA § 42-12-8, an appeal of

1 Since then, Jones has been before this Court numerous times. He filed two

direct appeals – one from the trial court’s order denying his motion to modify his

sentence, and another from the denial of his request for a hearing – both of which we

dismissed as untimely. Jones v. State, No. A14A1554 (May 6, 2014); Jones v. State,

No. A14A1556 (May 6, 2014). We similarly dismissed as untimely Jones’s

application for discretionary review of the denial of his motion for minutes of a grand

jury proceeding. Jones v. State, No. A15D0459 (July 9, 2015). Jones also filed an

appeal from the denial of his petition for a writ of mandamus, which we transferred

to the Supreme Court, Jones v. State, No. A14A1555 (May 5, 2014), which, in turn,

dismissed the appeal, Jones v. Hardy, No. S14A1459 (July 31, 2014). This Court

subsequently dismissed Jones’s appeals from the trial court’s orders: (i) denying yet

another motion to modify a void sentence, Jones v. State, No. A16A1757 (June 2,

2016); (ii) denying Jones’s motion to vacate a void judgment, Jones v. State, No.

A17A0276 (Oct. 20, 2016); and (iii) denying filing of his motion to correct the

record, Jones v. State, No. A17A1584 (May 11, 2017).

September 05, 2017
a civil action filed by a prisoner “shall be as provided in Code Section 5-6-35.” And

under OCGA § 5-6-35 (b), the party wishing to appeal must file an application for

discretionary review to the appropriate appellate court. Because a prisoner has no

right of direct appeal in civil cases, we lack jurisdiction to consider Jones’s direct

appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Jones v. Townsend, 267 Ga. 489, 490 (480

SE2d 24) (1997).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

09/05/2017
Exhibit 34.5.2

[Letterhead of Ernst & Young LLP]



Ernst & Young LLP901 E. Cary Street, Suite 1000Richmond, VA 23219


Phone: (804) 344-6000

www.ey.com

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors

SunTrust Bank

We have examined managements assertion included in the accompanying report of Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that SunTrust
Bank (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(4)(i), and 1122(d)(4)(ii) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for the residential mortgage loan servicing
platform of SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007. Refer to managements assertion for the asset backed transactions covered by this platform. Management is responsible for the Companys compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset backed transactions and securities that compromise the platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform,
and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing
activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts
calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied
with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007 for the residential mortgage loan servicing platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|                     
|March 6, 2008
Supplementary
Agreement to the Call Option


Agreement





Whereas,
on Oct 30th 2009,
Xu Hong Bing and Golden Wind Holdings Limited (collectively called the “seller”)
signed the Call Option Agreement (hereinafter call “Call Option Agreement”) with
__________________ (hereinafter called the “Buyer”). On April 30th 2010,
the Seller and Buyer entered into this Supplementary Agreement with respect to
the following matters.


RECITAL







1. In
accordance with the requirement of the “Condition 2” of DEFINITIONS1.1 and agreements
in Call Right2.1 in
Each Call Option Agreement, provided that Wuhan Guoce Nordic New Energy Co., Ltd
(hereinafter called the “Company”) and its subsidiaries achieving not less than
0.5 million US Dollar in after-tax net income for the fiscal year ended December
31st, 2009,
the Buyer shall be entitled to obtain 30% of the Seller’s shares;





2.
Whereas, most incomes of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31st, 2009
has not been recognized by the independent auditor of the Company for such
fiscal year and resulted in the failure of the Company satisfying the
requirement of the “Condition
2”;





Agreements





The
Seller and Buyer agreed that, under the principle of mutual interests, to lower
the requirement of the said after-tax income to not less than 0.3 million US
Dollars. That is the Company’s after-tax income for the fiscal year ended
December 31st, 2009
not less than 0.3 million US Dollars, the Buyer shall be entitled to obtain 30%
of the Seller’s shares. Remaining conditions and terms of the Call Option
Agreement shall remain unchanged.





This
Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be
an original, but all of which together shall constitute one instrument.
Execution and delivery of this Agreement by exchange of facsimile copies bearing
the facsimile signature of a Party shall constitute a valid and binding
execution and delivery of this Agreement by such Party.





[Signature
Page Follows]





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Parties
have executed and delivered this Agreement on April 30th,
2010,





The
Buyer


Signature:
______________





The
Seller


Signature:
______________





Golden
Wind Holdings Limited
Exhibit 10.02
 EXECUTIVE RETENTION AGREEMENT TRUST
 Trust Agreement   Company  Employee Trustee
 RECITALS
 WHEREAS Retention Agreement
 WHEREAS Trust
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 Section 1.  Establishment of Trust
  Code Section 2




---



##### 



Section 2.  Distributions from the Trust
  Section 3.  Investment Authority
   2




---



##### 



Section 4.  Disposition of Income
 Section 3 Section 2
 Section 5.  Accounting by Trustee
  3




---



##### 



Section 6.  Responsibility of Trustee
 Section 2
        4




---



##### 



Section 7.  Compensation and Expenses of Trustee
  Section 8.  Resignation and Removal of Trustee
    Section 9.  Appointment of Successor
 Section 8(a) or 8(b)
 Sections 3
 5




---



##### 



Section 10.  Amendment or Termination
   Section 11.  Miscellaneous
   if to the Company:
    
    Matrixx Initiatives, Inc.Attn: Executive Vice President and General Counsel8515 East Anderson DriveScottsdale AZ 85255Facsimile: (602) 385-8850with a copy (which shall
    
    Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.not constitute notice) to:
    
    Attn: Matthew P. FeeneyOne Arizona Center400 East Van BurenPhoenix, Arizona 85004-2202Facsimile: (602) 382-6070if to the Trustee:
    
    Valerie S. Trottier, CEBSSr. Vice PresidentNorthern Trust, N.A.2398 E. Camelback Road, Suite 400Phoenix, Arizona 85016Facsimile: (602) 912-8687
 6




---



##### 



if to the Employee:Facsimile: () -
   Section 12.  Effective Date
  EMPLOYEENORTHERN TRUST, N.A.By:Its::MATRIXX INITIATIVES, INC.By:Its:: 7
#### IN RE: CEI, LLC, Debtor. Brenda L. Livesay, Party-in-Interest-Appellant, v. Kenneth W. Livesay; Global Fiber, LLC, Defendants-Appellees, and Langdon M. Cooper, Trustee in Bankruptcy for CEI, LLC aka Communications Electrical Industries, LLC, Trustee-Appellee.

No. 17-1372

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 30, 2017

Decided: December 13, 2017

Charles R. Brewer, Gary A. Dodd, Ashe-ville, North Carolina, for Appellant. D. Rodney Eight, Jr., EIGHT LAW OFFICE, PC, Asheville, North Carolina; Langdon M. Cooper, Sharon S. Dove, MULLEN, HOLLAND *&*COOPER, PA, Gastonia, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILEINSON, SHEDD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

*116Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Brenda L. Livesay appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders denying her renewed motion to intervene in an adversary proceeding filed by the bankruptcy trustee, denying her motion to conduct discovery, and quashing subpoenas she issued. We have reviewed the record submitted on appeal and the arguments of the parties and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Livesay v. Livesay,*No. 1:16-cv-00361-MOC (W.D.N.C. Mar. 17, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 16, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00219

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.M.C. AND A.R.C., CHILDREN

,

Fro m the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017PA00064 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The reporter’s record in this accelerated appeal is due April 16, 2018

. On April 12, 2018

, court reporter

, Elva G. Chapa, filed a notification of late record asking for an extension of time. In her notice, Ms. Rivera stated she needs additional time to prepare the record because her

“ other duties or activities preclude working on the record.” She anticipates the reporter’s record will be “100 plus pages” in length

. She asks that we extend the time to file the record to April 30, 2018

— an extension of fourteen days from the original due date

We remind the reporter t hat, by statute, this appeal is accelerated, and is to ta ke precedence over other matters

. T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN

. § 109.002(a

- 1 ) ( West Supp. 201 7 ).
S trict deadlines exist with regard to disposal of appeals dealing with termination of parental rights

— specifically, the appellate court must dispose of the appeal within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed in the trial court. With regard to the appellate record, pursuant to Rule 35.3(c) of the appellate rules, this court may not grant an e xtension of more than ten days in an accelerated appeal. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.3(c).

We therefore GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART the court reporter’s request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record in this court. We ORDER court reporter El va G. Chapa to file the reporter ’ s record in this court on or before April 26, 2018

. With regard to termination appeals, in addition to the responsibility imposed on the trial court under Rule 35.3(c)

— trial court is jointly responsible for ensuring the appellate record is timely filed

— the trial court must direct the official or deputy reporter to immediately commence the preparation of the reporter’s record. Id. 28.4(b)(1). The trial court must arrange for a substitute reporter if necessary to ensure the reporter’s record is timely filed. Id.

We further order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel, the court reporter, and the trial court.____ _____________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 16th day of April, 2018

.

__ _________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 136 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

  1st Session
S. RES. 136

          To authorize representation by Senate Legal Counsel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 19, 1995

    Mr. Dole (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
          To authorize representation by Senate Legal Counsel.
Whereas, in the case of United States ex rel. Sequoia Orange Company v. Sunland 
        Packing House Company, Case No. CV-F-88-566 OWWW/DLB, and consolidated 
        cases, pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern 
        District of California, a subpoena for testimony at a hearing has been 
        issued to Senator Dianne Feinstein;
Whereas, by rule VI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no Senator shall absent 
        himself or herself from the service of the Senate without leave;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial process, be taken from 
        such control or possession but by permission of the Senate; and
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(2) (1994), the 
        Senate may direct its counsel to represent committees, Members, 
        officers, and employees of the Senate with respect to subpoenas or 
        orders issued to them in their official capacity: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is directed to represent 
Senator Feinstein in connection with the subpoena issued to her in 
these cases.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 672 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 672

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for a five-
 year extension of the rural community hospital demonstration program, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 2015

Mr. Young of Alaska (for himself, Mr. Amodei, Mr. King of Iowa, and Mr. 
  Loebsack) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for a five-
 year extension of the rural community hospital demonstration program, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rural Community Hospital 
Demonstration Extension Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. FIVE-YEAR EXTENSION OF THE RURAL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 
              DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM.

    (a) Extension.--Section 410A of the Medicare Prescription Drug, 
Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173; 42 
U.S.C. 1395ww note), as amended by sections 3123 and 10313 of the 
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148), is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(5), by striking ``5-year extension 
        period'' and inserting ``10-year extension period''; and
            (2) in subsection (g)--
                    (A) in the subsection heading, by striking ``Five-
                Year'' and inserting ``Ten-Year'';
                    (B) in paragraph (1), by striking ``additional 5-
                year'' and inserting ``additional 10-year''; and
                    (C) by striking ``5-year extension period'' and 
                inserting ``10-year extension period'' each place it 
                appears.
    (b) Change in Timing for Report.--Subsection (e) of such section 
410A is amended by striking ``Not later than 6 months after the 
completion'' and inserting ``Not later than 2 years prior to the 
completion''.
                                 <all>
```
-----"Gaerlan, Joan" <JGaerlan@ci.glendale.ca.us> wrote: -----

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA From: "Gaerlan, Joan" <JGa erlan@ci.glendale.ca.us> Date: 07/07/2010 05:49PM cc: "Cruz, Nicolas" <N Cruz@ci.glendale.ca.us> Subject: Request for Ex tension of EPA Questionnaire for Plant ID 02827

Dear Ms. Alicea,

On behalf of City of Glendale Water and Power, please find the attached pdf file as our request for extension of EPA questionnaire for Grayson Power Plant (Pla nt ID 02827). A hard copy of this letter has been sent to your attention via snail mail today. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Nick Cruz at 818.548.3399.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

Joan Antonette V. Gaerlan

Mechanical Engineering Assistant

Glendale Water & Power - Power Management

Tel. 818.548.2828

Fax. 818.548.3377

JGaerlan@ci.glendale.ca.us 

### Pa g e 1 of 1

8/17/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C36F777DO

...
# EUR-Lex - 32002R0509 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32002R0509

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 509/2002 of 21 March 2002 amending Annex II to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products **

*
Official Journal L 079 , 22/03/2002 P. 0015 - 0015 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 509/2002

of 21 March 2002

amending Annex II to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1670/2000(2), and in particular Article 31(14) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 31 of Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 provides for the granting of refunds for certain products covered by that Regulation when they are exported in the form of the products listed in Annex II thereto.

(2) Commission Regulation (EC) No 2031/2001 of 6 August 2001 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff(3) amends the Combined Nomenclature for certain products.

(3) Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 should consequently be amended.

(4) The amendments should apply from the date of application of Regulation (EC) No 2031/2001.

(5) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999, the line: ">TABLE>"

is replaced by the following: ">TABLE>"

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply from 1 January 2002.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 March 2002.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48.

(2) OJ L 193, 29.7.2000, p. 10.

(3) OJ L 279, 23.10.2001, p. 1.
|   | 1. | Such      Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 30, 2010, fully      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year      ended September 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of A5 Laboratories      Inc. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      January 20, 2011 | /s/ Richard      Azani            |   |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|                        | Richard      Azani                |   |
|                        | Principal      Accounting Officer |   |

----