alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 8.1
 LIST OF SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES
  Proportion ofState or
    
    OwnershipName of Significant Subsidiary
    
    Jurisdiction of Incorporation
    
    InterestTEEKAY AUSTRALIA OFFSHORE HOLDINGS PTY LTD.
    
    AUSTRALIA
    
    
    100.00
    %NAVION
BERGEN L.L.C.
    
    MARSHALL ISLANDS
    
    
    100.00
    %VARG L.L.C.
    
    MARSHALL ISLANDS
    
    
    100.00
    %NAVION
GOTHENBURG L.L.C.
    
    MARSHALL ISLANDS
    
    
    50.00
    %NAVION OFFSHORE LOADING AS
    
    NORWAY
    
    
    50.99
    %NORSK TEEKAY AS
    
    NORWAY
    
    
    50.99
    %NORSK TEEKAY HOLDINGS LTD.
    
    MARSHALL ISLANDS
    
    
    50.99
    %TEEKAY
EUROPEAN HOLDINGS S.A.R.L.
    
    LUXEMBOURG
    
    
    50.99
    %TEEKAY NAVION OFFSHORE LOADING PTE. LTD.
    
    SINGAPORE
    
    
    50.99
    %TEEKAY NETHERLANDS EUROPEAN HOLDINGS BV
    
    NETHERLANDS
    
    
    50.99
    %TEEKAY
NORDIC HOLDINGS INC.
    
    MARSHALL ISLANDS
    
    
    50.99
    %TEEKAY NORWAY AS
    
    NORWAY
    
    
    50.99
    %TEEKAY OFFSHORE OPERATING L.P.
    
    MARSHALL ISLANDS
    
    
    50.99
    %UGLAND NORDIC SHIPPING AS
    
    NORWAY
    
    
    50.99
    %
Exhibit 35.2

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)

GMAC Mortgage, LLC

RALI Series 2007-QS1 Trust (the Issuing Entity)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of GMAC Mortgage, LLC, as servicer (the Servicer) pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement, does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the Servicers activities during the period covered by the Issuing Entitys report on Form 10-K and of the Servicers performance under
the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
duly executed this Certificate this 24th day of March 2008.



|       |  |                         
|------ |  | ------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Anthony N. Renzi    
|Name:  |  | Anthony N. Renzi        
|Title: |  | Executive Vice President
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 18, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130182 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130182 

 COA: 257557 

Wayne CC: 02-014804-01

HANS LEE THOMAS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 1, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the 

case of People v Smith (Docket No. 130353) is pending on appeal before this Court and 

that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for 

leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the 

decision in that case. 

p1011 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 18, 2006 

 Clerk
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of Aviat Networks, Inc.:



| |  |  | Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-140442) pertaining to the Aviat Networks, Inc. 2007 Stock Equity Plan;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-163542) pertaining to the Aviat Networks, Inc. 2007 Stock Equity Plan and Aviat Networks, Inc.
2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Registration Statement (Form S-1 No. 333-140193) pertaining to the registration of 539,195 shares of Class A Common Stock issued or issuable
by Aviat Networks, Inc.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our reports dated September 12, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule of Aviat Networks, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Aviat Networks, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended July 1, 2011.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Redwood City, California

September 12, 2011
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, David J. Kornder, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Patina Oil & Gas Corporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 1, 2003
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ANDCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER***

 

Pursuant toSection 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted),Sergio Magistri, Chief Executive Officer of InVision Technologies, Inc. (the“Company”), and Ross Mulholland, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.                                       TheCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 30, 2003,and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1 (the “PeriodicReport”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**,the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 12th day ofMay, 2003.

 

 
|   |   | /s/ Sergio  Magistri     |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Sergio  Magistri         |
|   |   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|   |   |                     |
|   |   |                     |
|   |   | /s/ Ross  Mulholland     |   |
|   |   | Ross  Mulholland         |
|   |   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to InVisionTechnologies, Inc. and will be retained by InVision Technologies, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----

* This certificationaccompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SECand is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company underthe Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q),irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----
#### Percy HUTTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charlotte JENKINS, Warden Respondent-Appellee.

No. 13-3968

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Filed November 22, 2017

Michael J. Benza, Law Office of Michael J. Benza, Chagrin Falls, OH, Jillian S. Davis, Alan C. Rossman, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Cleveland, OH, for Petitioner-Appellant

Eric E. Murphy, Katherine Elizabeth Mullin, Office of the Attorney General of Ohio, Cleveland, OH, Charles L. Wille, Hannah Carrigg Wilson, Office of the Attorney General of Ohio, Columbus, OH, for Respondent-Appellee

BEFORE: MERRITT, ROGERS, and DONALD, Circuit Judges.

*585PER CURIAM.

This death-penalty case comes back to our court on remand after the Supreme Court’s decision in *Jenkins v. Hutton,*— U.S. —, 137 S.Ct. 1769, 198 L.Ed.2d 415 (2017). There the Court reversed this panel’s conditional grant of Hutton’s habeas petition, holding that we improperly applied the fundamental-miscarriage-óf-jus-tice exception to procedural default when we granted relief on Hutton’s jury-instruction claim. *See id.*at 1771-73. Because that exception does not apply and because, for the reasons given in our previous opinion, Hutton has not otherwise shown a valid basis for excusing the procedural default, *Hutton v. Mitchell,*839 F.3d 486, 500-01 (2016), the district court properly denied his jury-instruction claim as procedurally defaulted. With respect to Hutton’s other claims of error, we reject them for the reasons given in our prior opinion. *See id.*at 500-05. We therefore affirm the judgment of the district court denying Hutton’s petition for habeas corpus.

MERRITT, Circuit Judge,

dissenting.

This death-penalty case is now back before us after the Supreme Court reversed our decision to conditionally grant habeas relief unless Hutton received a new sentencing hearing. *Jenkins v. Hutton,*— U.S. —, 137 S.Ct. 1769, 198 L.Ed.2d 415 (2017), *reh’g denied,*2017 WL 3642151, — U.S. —, 138 S.Ct. 43, 198 L.Ed.2d 770 (Aug. 25, 2017). There is no dispute that Hutton’s jury was never instructed on what “aggravating” factors it could consider in deciding between life and death for Hutton. The result was a jury with “unfettered discretion” to impose a death sentence in violation of the Eighth Amendment. *Gregg v. Georgia,*428 U.S. 153, 96 S.Ct. 2909, 49 L.Ed.2d 859 (1976); *see also Furman v. Georgia,*408 U.S. 238, 92 S.Ct. 2726, 33 L.Ed.2d 346 (1972). In its opinion, the Supreme Court did not rule on, or even mention, the issue raised in my separate concurrence in our 2016 opinion regarding whether the issue concerning the lack of a jury instruction on aggravators was procedurally defaulted. Because the Supreme Court did not address this issue, I continue to believe, for the reasons set forth in my 2016 separate opinion, that the three Ohio Supreme Court Justices were correct to reach the conclusion that the lack of a proper jury instruction violated *Gregg. Hutton v. Mitchell,*839 F.3d 486, 505 (6th Cir. 2016) (Merritt, J., concurring). I continue to adhere to my original position that there was no basis for our holding that the issue had been procedurally defaulted.
#### Martha Mary PETITE, in her capacity as personal representative for the Estate of Carl Petite, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-55314

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*343Submitted November 15, 2017 * Pasadena, California

Filed December 08, 2017

Lawrence David Rohlfing, Attorney, Law Offices of Lawrence Rohlfing, Santa Fe Springs, CA, for Plairitiff-Appellant

Before: NGUYEN and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and LOGAN,** District Judge.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P, 34(a)(2).

**

**The Honorable Steven Paul Logan, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Martha Mary Petite appeals a district court order affirming the denial of an application filed by her late husband, Carl Petite, for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we review the district court’s order de novo. *Hoopai v. Astrue,*499 F.3d 1071, 1074 (9th Cir. 2007). We affirm.

At step five of the sequential evaluation process, the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) concluded that Petite was capable of performing “other work that exists in significant numbers in the national economy.” *Tackett v. Apfel,*180 F.3d 1094, 1100 (9th Cir. 1999) (internal quotation marks omitted); 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520(a)(v). Petite was unable to perform the full range of “medium work” under the Medical-Vocational Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) because of his significant nonexertional limitations. *See*20 C.F.R. pt. 404, subpt. P, app. 2; 20 C.F.R. § 404.1569a(c). As a re-suit, the ALJ properly consulted a vocational expert, who testified that Petite could perform work as a data entry clerk. *See Tackett,*180 F.3d at 1102-04. There are 272,810 positions for, a data entry clerk in the national economy. The ALJ’s step-five determirtation is supported by substantial evidence, and is not legally erroneous. *See Hoopai,*499 F.3d at 1074.

Petite argues that the ALJ’s application of Guidelines section 203.08 was erroneous because he could not perform the full range of “medium work.” *See*20 C.F.R. pt. 404, subpt. P, app. 2, § 203.08. However, in addition to relying on a vocational expert’s testimony, the ALJ was permitted to use the “medium work” grid as a “framework” for decision-making since Petite’s exertional limitations match the definition of “medium work.” *See Cooper v. Sullivan,*880 F.2d 1152, 1155 (9th Cir. 1989); 20 C.F.R. pt. 404, subpt. P, app. 2, § 200.00(e)(2); 20 C.F.R. § 404.1567(c).

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 256 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 256

   To authorize the production of records by the Select Committee on 
                              Intelligence

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 1996

    Mr. Dole (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   To authorize the production of records by the Select Committee on 
                              Intelligence

Whereas the Office of the Inspector General of the Central Intelligence Agency 
        has requested that the Select Committee on Intelligence provide it with 
        copies of committee records relevant to the Office's pending review of 
        matters related to the Zona Rosa massacre of six American citizens in El 
        Salvador in 1985;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be 
        taken from such control or possession but by permission of the Senate;
Whereas, when it appears that documents, papers, and records under the control 
        or in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of 
        justice, the Senate will take such action as will promote the ends of 
        justice consistently with the privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Select 
Committee on Intelligence, acting jointly, are authorized to provide to 
the Office of Inspector General of the Central Intelligence Agency, 
under appropriate security procedures, copies of records that the 
Office has requested for use in connection with its pending review into 
matters related to the Zona Rosa massacre.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.25






Waiver and Release
 
  This Waiver (this “Waiver”) is made as of October 27, 2010, between CleanTech Innovations, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and Wenge Chen (“Chen”).
  In consideration of the release by the Company below, Chen hereby consents and agrees to waive all rights to the payment of RMB 5,690,100 due under the Approval on Share Transfer Regarding Creative Bellows Manufacture Co., Ltd., dated September 15, 2010, from the Department of Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation of Liaoning Province.
  In consideration for the execution of the Waiver, Company does hereby release and forever discharge Chen and his successors and assigns of and from all claims, actions, causes of action, liability, demands and damages of whatever name or nature, whether at law or in equity, in any manner having arisen, arising, or to arise from the beginning of time to the date hereof.
  
   CLEANTECH INNOVATIONS, INC.
  /s/ Bei Lu
 By: Bei Lu
 Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
  
 /s/ Wenge Chen
 Wenge Chen
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,153
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,033
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,379
<INVENTORY>                                      2,164
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,730
<PP&E>                                          87,982
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,833
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 157,692
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,291
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           174
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,854
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   157,692
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                94,039
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  150,696
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                11,240
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,082
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (56,657)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (836)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (55,821)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (55,821)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.19)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

| (1)    | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period                ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                Act of                1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
| (2)    | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company.                                                                                                                                                   |

| Date:                November 3, 2005 | /s/                Joseph L. Sullivan    |   |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  | Joseph                L. Sullivan        |   |
|                                  | President                                |   |
|                                  | (chief                executive officer) |   |
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 183

Making majority party appointments to certain Senate committees for the

104th Congress.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 12 (legislative day, OCTOBER 10), 1995

Mr. KEMPTHORNE (for Mr. DOLE) submitted the following resolution; which

was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Making majority party appointments to certain Senate

committees for the 104th Congress.

1 Resolved, That the following shall constitute the ma2 jority party’s membership on the following standing com3 mittees for the 104th Congress, or until their successors

4 are chosen:

5 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS: Mr. Hatfield, Mr.

6 Stevens, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Specter, Mr. Domenici, Mr.

7 Bond, Mr. Gorton, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Mack, Mr. Burns,

8 Mr. Shelby, Mr. Jeffords, Mr. Gregg, Mr. Bennett, and

9 Mr. Campbell.
2

SRES 183 ATS

1 COMMITTEE ON FINANCE: Mr. Roth, Mr. Dole, Mr.

2 Chafee, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Simpson, Mr. Pres3 sler, Mr. D’Amato, Mr. Murkowski, Mr. Nickles, and Mr.

4 Gramm.

Æ