alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
JEFFERY D. SHORES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-2135

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 7, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County.

Robert M. Foster, Judge.

Jeffery D. Shores, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Samuel B. Steinberg, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, JAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 27

To grant the consent of the Congress to certain additional powers conferred

upon the Bi-State Development Agency by the States of Missouri and Illinois.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 23 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1995

Mr. BOND (for himself, Mr. SIMON, Mr. ASHCROFT, and Ms. MOSELY-BRAUN)

introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

To grant the consent of the Congress to certain additional

powers conferred upon the Bi-State Development Agency

by the States of Missouri and Illinois.

Whereas the Congress in consenting to the compact between

Missouri and Illinois creating the Bi-State Development

Agency and the Bi-State Metropolitan District provided

that no power shall be exercised by the Bi-State Agency

under the provisions of article III of such compact until

such power has been conferred upon the Bi-State Agency

by the legislatures of the States to the compact and approved by an Act of Congress; and

Whereas such States have now enacted certain legislation in

order to confer certain additional powers on such BiState Development Agency: Now, therefore, be it
2

•SJ 27 IS

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That—

4 (a) The consent of the Congress is hereby given to

5 the additional powers conferred on the Bi-State Develop6 ment Agency by Senate Bill 114, Laws of Missouri 1993

7 and Public Act 88–611 (Senate Bill 1670), Laws of Illi8 nois 1994.

9 (b) The powers conferred by the Acts consented to

10 in subsection (a) shall take effect on January 1, 1995.

11 SEC. 2. The provisions of the Act of August 31, 1950

12 (64 Stat. 568) shall apply to the additional powers ap13 proved under this joint resolution to the same extent as

14 if such additional powers were conferred under the provi15 sions of the compact consented to in such Act.

16 SEC. 3. The right to alter, amend, or repeal this joint

17 resolution is expressly reserved.

18 SEC. 4. The right is hereby reserved to the Congress

19 to require the disclosure and furnishings of such informa20 tion or data by the Bi-State Development Agency as is

21 deemed appropriate by the Congress.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Juniper Growth Corporation (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, the undersigned officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  February 15, 2010

/s/    Joseph R. Rozelle



JOSEPH R. ROZELLE

Principal Executive Officer

and Principal Financial Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                          CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                           (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  section  1350,  chapter  63  of  title  18,  United States Code),  the
undersigned  officer  of  Cyberspace  Vita,  Inc.,  a Nevada  corporation  (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Amended annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal  year  ended December 31,
2008 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the  requirements  of
Section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of 1934, and the
information contained in the Amended Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: March 8, 2010

                                              /s/ Geoffrey Alison
					      -------------------
                                              Geoffrey Alison
                                              Principal Executive Officer and
					      Principal Accounting Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section  906  has  been
provided to CYBERSPACE VITA, INC. and will be retained by CYBERSPACE VITA, INC.
and furnished to the Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff upon
request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William HUNT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-4521

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued: October 26, 2017

Decided: November 16, 2017

*289ARGUED: Paresh S. Patel, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant. Michael Clayton Hanlon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: James Wyda, Federal Public Defender, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Hunt was sentenced in the District of Maryland on August 4, 2016, and seeks relief from that sentence in this appeal. Hunt maintains that the district court erred in ruling that he is a career offender under Sentencing Guidelines section 4B1.1. More specifically, Hunt asserts that — with the acquiescence of the probation officer, the prosecutors, and his own lawyers — the court utilized the wrong version of the Guidelines in rendering its career offender ruling. That is, rather than applying the definition of a predicate “crime of violence” found in section 4B1.2(a) as amended effective August 1, 2016 — three days before Hunt’s sentence was imposed — the court erroneously looked to the pre-amendment version of that guideline. *See*USSG § lBl.ll(a) (requiring a sentencing court to “use the Guidelines Manual in effect on the date that the defendant is sentenced”). Hunt further contends that the court improperly deemed him to be a career offender, in that his prior Hobbs Act robbery offense does not qualify as a crime of violence under section 4B1.2(a) as amended.

Notably, the government concedes on appeal that the sentencing court erroneously utilized an outdated version of the Guidelines. The government advocated at oral argument, however, that we leave it to the district court to decide in the first instance whether Hunt is a career offender under section 4B 1.2(a) as amended. We agree and, in the interests of justice, vacate Hunt’s sentence and remand for such other and further proceedings as may be appropriate.

*VACATED AND REMANDED*
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antowan THORNE, a/k/a Smooth, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6748

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 30, 2017

Decided: December 20, 2017

Antowan Thorne, Appellant Pro Se. Marc Birnbaum, Special Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this'circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Antowan Thorne seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner sat*144isfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Thorne has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

M i chael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 23, 2009

0615 

# Order

June 23, 2009

138620

MABLE C. AUSTIN, STEPHANIE AUSTIN, NELLIE M. DUKE, DO LORES McELREATH, ALFRED H. PHILLIPS, VAL JEAN PHILLIPS, QUETA L. SIEFKER, ATORA TODESCHINI, and DOROTHY TODESCHINI, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 138620 COA: 282583 Oakland CC: 2007-080339-CZ MICHAEL EUGENE KELLY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 26, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James H. Mackaness, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, certify that the Quarterly Report of IRIDEX Corporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2010 (i) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
(ii) that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of IRIDEX Corporation.



|                     |  |                                             
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: August 5, 2010
|                     | 
|By:                  |  | /s/ JAMES H. MACKANESS                      
|Name:                |  | James H. Mackaness                          
|Title:               |  | Chief Financial Officer                     
|                     |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 10.2



Ruby Creek Resources Ltd.
	600 - 890 West Pender St.
	Vancouver,  B.C.
	V6C 1K4



July 9, 2008
Carl von Einsiedel
Ram Exploration Ltd.
1124 - 470  Granville St.
Vancouver,  B.C.



Re:  More Creek Claims -  payment schedule



Carl,



Could you please confirm by signing below that you are willing to amend our agreement, dated July 15, 2006, regarding the More Creek Property such that the payment schedule is now the following:



The cash payments will total CDN$100,000 over 4 years, payable as follows:

(a)  $2,500 on October 15, 2006 (paid);

(b)  $10,000 on July 15, 2007 amended to payment of $2,000 on April 15,2008 (paid): $1,500 payable on September 30, 2008: and $6,500 payable on March 1, 2009;

(c)  $3,000 payable on June 30,2009 and $12,000 on July 31, 2009;

(d)  $20,000 on November 30, 2009; and

(e)  $52,500 on November 30, 2010.

The Property is subject to a 2% net smelter return royalty ("NSR") of which 1% can be repurchased at any time by the vendor for $1,000,000.  The Property is comprised of 8 mineral claims covering a total of 2,919 hectares and title is held in the name of the vendor.  Title will be transferred to the Company upon receipt of all of the cash payments, as described above.



Sincerely,"Brian Roberts"
Brian Roberts,
President,
Ruby Creek Resources

Approved:"Carl von Einsiedel"
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Amendment No.1 to the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) by China Growth Corporation (the “Company”), I, Patrick S.H. Chan, the Interim Chief Financial Officer and Interim Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:





1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








China Growth CorporationDate: June 6, 2011
By:
/s/ Patrick S.H. ChanPatrick S.H. ChanInterim Chief Financial Officer and

Interim Principal Accounting Officer











This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished upon request.
Exhibit
32.1







CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection
with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Targa Resources Partners LP (the
“Partnership”) for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Rene R. Joyce, as
Chief Executive Officer of Targa Resources GP LLC, the general partner of the
Partnership, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his
knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.




By:/s/ Rene R.
Joyce
 Name: Rene R.
Joyce
 Title: Chief Executive
Officer of Targa Resources GP LLC,
 the general partner of
Targa Resources Partners LP
  Date:
March 3, 2010


A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the
Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit
      32.1


**CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of GW One, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
        10-KSB
        for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jianwen Sun, certify, pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
        2002, that to my knowledge:
  (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 By:
              /s/ Jianwen
                SunJianwen
                  Sun
                Principal
                  Executive Officer
                Principal
                  Financial Officer
                March
                  28, 2007
   *A
        signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
        provided to GW One, Inc. and will be retained by GW One, Inc. and furnished
        to
        the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.*
 
 *This
        Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Rule 15(d) and shall not be deemed
        “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or
        otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This Certification shall
        not
        be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
        Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically
        incorporates it by reference.*
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Zhang Hui, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Amendment No. 2 to the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tsingda eEdu Corporation for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in this Amendment No. 3 to Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Tsingda
eEdu Corporation.

|                       |        |                               
|---------------------- | ------ | ------------------------------
|                       | By:    | /s/ Zhang Hui                 
|                       |        |                               
|Date: January 16, 2013 | Name:  | Zhang Hui                     
|                       | Title: | Chief
 Executive Officer      
|                       |        | (Principal
 Executive Officer)

---
AD Grid Sheet 

Docket No.: FAA-2013-0468 

Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-147-AD 

AD Action: Final Rule 

This action applies to The Boeing Company Model 777-200 and -300 series airplanes 

equipped with Rolls-Royce engines. 

ONCURRENCES 

(~ 

If this draft is acceptable, please legibly sign the grid to the right with your first initial 1:?-:-:~----''-------T-~.-­

and full last name to show concurrence with this AD. 

SIGNATURE (First Initial/Last Name) 

DATE 

ROUTING SYMBOL 

SIGNATURE (First Initial/Last Name) 

OUTING SYMBOL 

SIGNATURE (First Initial/Last Name) 

ATE 

OUTING SYMBOL 

SIGNATURE (First Initial/Last Name) 

ATE 
AD Grid Sheet 

Docket No.: FAA-2013-0468 

Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-147-AD 

AD Action: Final Rule 

This action applies to The Boeing Company Model 777-200 and -300 series airplanes 

equipped with Rolls-Royce engines. 

If this draft is acceptable, please legibly sign the grid to the right with your first initial 

and full last name to show concurrence with this AD. 

ONCURRENCES 

ROUTING SYMBOL 

ANM-120S 

ROUTING SYMBOL 

ANM-120S 

P. Forde 

AEG 

SIGNATIJl{E (First In itial/Last Name) 

j_.t_ (. 

DATE J' 

tZiticflu( 

ROUTING SYMBOL 

ANM-IOOS hrl'- siGNATURE (First lnitialfl"'l<l Narnc) 

f. -

IGNATURE (First Initial/Last Name) 

DATE 

ROUTING SYMBOl. 

SIGNA H IRE (First lnitialll .ast Name) 

DATE 

ROUTING SYMBOL 

IGNATIJRE (first Initial/Last Name) 

ATE 
AD Grid Sheet 

Docket No.: FAA-2013-0468 

Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-147-AD 

AD Action: Final Rule 

This action applies to The Boeing Company Model 777-200 and -300 series airplanes 

equipped with Rolls-Royce engines. 

If this draft is acceptable, please legibly sign the grid to the right with your first initial 

and full last name to show concurrence with this AD. 

CONCURRENCES 

ROUTING SYMBOL 

ANM-120S 

N. Luthra 

SlGNATUr:-:J~ X!Last N~ 

!' v' A~ .. ' DATE 

rdv-'-A f 5. 2-c i ~- ROUTING SYMBOl: 

ANM-120S 

P. Forde 

SIGNATURE (Firstlnitiai!Last Name) 

f.r;~ DATE 

7 /1-'l 1 L L1 

ROUTING SYMBOL 

ANM·)Jl8B 

SIG~~ lnitiaULast Name) 

I9AI:!h>!l I lf ; 

RO'dftNG S'(MBOl;/~ 

AEG /. 

SIGNATURE (first Jnitiai(Last Name) 

DATE 

LvvlJ -P l ~ 

~ {) (Lo/'-( 

[ROUTING SYMBOL 

ANM-lOOS 

SIGNATURE (FirstlnitiaVLast Name) 

DATE 

ROUTING SYMBOL 

SIGNATURE (l'irstlnitiaVLast Name) 

DATE 

ROUTING SYMBOL 

SIGNATURE (First Initial/Last Kame) 

DATE 

[ROUTING SYMBOL 

SIGNATURE (First Initial/Last Name) 

DATE
Exhibit 4.31
  MPEL (Macau Peninsula) Limited( Melco PBL (Macau Peninsula)
Limited, Swift Profit Investments Limited)  MPEL MP
   Re:
    
    Promissory Transfer of Shares Agreement dated 17 May 2006 (Agreement) entered into
between MPEL MPas promissory buyer and we, (i.)Double Margin Limited, a
company duly incorporated under the laws of the British Virgin Islands (Double
Margin), (ii.)Leong On Kei,aka Angela Leong(Angela
Leong), as promissory sellers (Promissory Sellers), and (iii.)Sociedade
de Fomento Predial Omar, Limitada, a company duly incorporated under the laws of Macau
(Omar), in relation to the sale and purchase of the entire issued share capital of
Omar.
 We Double Margin Angela Leong Agreement Agreement
 Agreement Agreement , MPEL MP Promissory Sellers
 Agreement MPEL MP Promissory Sellers




---



##### 



PROMISSORY SELLERS OMAR MPEL MP AGREEMENT MPEL MPs Agreement
 Agreement( )
   Double Margin Limited
 SIGNED by Mr. Li Chi Keung
    
    
    )
    
    
    /s/ Li Chi Keung)in the presence of:-
    
    
    )/s/ Connie Kong IeongWitness : Kong Ieong, Connie
    
    
    )Leong On Keiaka Angela Leong
    
    
    )
    
    
    /s/ Angela Leong)signed in the presence of:-
    
    
    )/s/ Connie Kong IeongWitness: Kong Ieong, Connie
    
    
    )
  2




---



##### 



MPEL (Macau Peninsula) Limited
    
    
    )
    
    
    /s/ Chung Yuk Man)SIGNED by Chung Yuk Man
    
    
    ))in the presence of:-
    
    
    )Purple WhangWitness:-
    
    
    )
   3