alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 117 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 117

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the current Federal income tax 
 deduction for interest paid on debt secured by a first or second home 
     located in the United States should not be further restricted.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                  May 9 (legislative day, May 1), 1995

  Mr. Roth (for himself, Mr. Baucus, Mr. D'Amato, and Mr. Kempthorne) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                               on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Senate that the current Federal income tax 
 deduction for interest paid on debt secured by a first or second home 
     located in the United States should not be further restricted.
Whereas homeownership is an important factor in promoting economic security and 
        stability for American families;
Whereas homeownership is a fundamental American ideal, which promotes social and 
        economic benefits beyond the benefits that accrue to the occupant of the 
        home;
Whereas homeownership promotes and stabilizes neighborhoods and communities;
Whereas it is proper that the policy of the Federal Government is and should 
        continue to be to encourage homeownership;
Whereas the increase in the cost of housing over the last 10 years has been 
        greater than the increase in family income;
Whereas for the first time in 50 years, the percentage of people in the United 
        States owning their own homes has declined;
Whereas the percentage of people in the United States between the ages of 25 and 
        29 who own their own homes has declined from 43 percent in 1976 to 38 
        percent today;
Whereas the current Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on debt 
        secured by first homes located in the United States has been a valuable 
        cornerstone of this Nation's housing policy for most of this century and 
        may well be the most important component of housing-related tax policy 
        in America today;
Whereas the current Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on debt 
        secured by second homes located in the United States is of crucial 
        importance to the economies of many communities; and
Whereas the Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on debt secured by a 
        first or second home has been limited twice in the last 6 years, and was 
        further eroded as a result of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 
        1990: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the current 
Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on debt secured by a 
first or second home located in the United States should not be further 
restricted.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Disability Access Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Chin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the Company.



|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|By:/s/ Peter Chin
Peter Chin
Chief Executive Officer
June 30, 2010





---





EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Disability Access Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Chin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the Company.



|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|By:/s/ Peter Chin
Peter Chin
Chief Financial Officer
June 30, 2010





---
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 102 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 102

    To express the sense of the Senate concerning Pakistan and the 
               impending visit of Prime Minister Bhutto.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               April 4 (legislative day, March 27), 1995

 Mr. Brown (for himself, Ms. Mikulski, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Helms, and 
Mr. Pell) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Foreign Relations

                April 6 (legislative day, April 5), 1995

        Committee discharged; considered, amended, and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    To express the sense of the Senate concerning Pakistan and the 
               impending visit of Prime Minister Bhutto.

Whereas Pakistan and the United States have been allies since 1947, and 
        throughout the difficult days of the Cold War;
Whereas Pakistan was a front-line state against Soviet totalitarian expansionism 
        and worked with the United States to successfully end the Soviet 
        occupation of Afghanistan;
Whereas Pakistan has been in the forefront of United Nations peacekeeping 
        operations, recently being the largest contributor of forces to United 
        Nations peacekeeping operations;
Whereas Pakistan has cooperated with the United States in the apprehension and 
        swift extradition of Ramzi Ahmed Yousef, the alleged mastermind of the 
        terrorist attack on the World Trade Center in New York City;
Whereas Pakistan's economy is being increasingly liberalized and opened to 
        outside investors and businesses;
Whereas there are increasing opportunities for economic cooperation between 
        Pakistan and the United States as a result of private sector agreements 
        for investment in Pakistan's energy sector and other pending agreements; 
        and
Whereas Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, who has worked to strengthen Pakistan's 
        close relationship with the United States, was reelected to office in 
        October, 1993, and is scheduled to visit the United States on an 
        official visit in April: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the United States Senate--
            (1) welcomes the visit of Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto to 
        the United States as a sign of the warm, enduring friendship 
        between the people of the United States and Pakistan; and
            (2) pledges to work with the Government of Pakistan to 
        strengthen the United States-Pakistan relationship in the years 
        ahead.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0369 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ERIN ELLIOT HOLCOMB,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 5 , 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 5 2024

03/05/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0369
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 243

To designate the week of May 5, 1996 as ‘‘National Correctional Officers

and Employees Week’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 16, 1996

Mr. ROBB submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

To designate the week of May 5, 1996 as ‘‘National

Correctional Officers and Employees Week’’.

Whereas the operation of correctional facilities represents a

crucial component of our criminal justice system;

Whereas correctional personnel play a vital role in protecting

the rights of the public to be safeguarded from criminal

activity;

Whereas correctional personnel are responsible for the safety

and dignity of human beings charged to their care; and

Whereas correctional personnel work under demanding circumstances and face danger in their daily work lives:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates the week of May

2 5, 1996 as ‘‘National Correctional Officers and Employees
2

•SRES 243 IS

1 Week’’. The President is authorized and requested to issue

2 a proclamation calling upon the people of the United

3 States to observe such week with appropriate ceremonies

4 and activities.

Æ
EXHIBIT 10.12
                                                                   -------------

                                PERSONAL GUARANTY

           1. IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other
sufficient consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the
undersigned ("Guarantor") unconditionally guarantees to Gemstone Investment
Company, Inc. (the "Lender"), the payment when due of the a certain $750,000
Promissory Note, dated June 4, 2002, made pursuant to a Loan Agreement, also
dated as of June 4, 2002, between LocatePLUS Holdings Corporation (the
"Principal") in favor of the Lender (collectively, the "Obligations").

           2. In the event that Principal fails at any time to make any part or
all of its payments under the Obligations, whether by acceleration or otherwise,
Guarantor will pay the liabilities guaranteed in the same manner as if they
constituted the direct and primary obligation of the Guarantor.

           3. Guarantor agrees that any extension of credit for the purchase of
goods, or services, or for any other reason Lender has made, or may hereinafter
make under the terms of the Obligations, to Principal shall be considered made
on the strength of, and in reliance upon this Guaranty Agreement.

           4. At any time after an event of default under the Obligations that
remains uncured, any or all of Principal's Obligations shall, at Lender's
option, become (for the purposes of this Guaranty) immediately due and payable
by the Guarantor. Lender shall have the right to proceed against Guarantor for
the amount thereof without notice.

           5. The invalidity of any one or more  provisions of this Guaranty
shall not affect the remaining provisions of this Guaranty. This Guaranty shall
be binding on the successors and assigns of Guarantor.

           This Guaranty shall not be released or modified by the death of any
Guarantor or dissolution or bankruptcy of Principal.

           Executed as of June 4, 2002.



WITNESS:                               GUARANTOR:

                                       /s/ Jon R. Latorella
---------------------------            ------------------------------
                                       Jon R. Latorella



                                       Address:

                                       ______________________________

                                       ______________________________

                                       ______________________________
Opinion issued September 27, 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 1 6 - 00 722 - CV

——————————— IN RE RAYMOND C. CLA RK, JR. , Relator

O rigi n a l P ro ceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Raymond C. Clark, Jr., has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus, challenging a final order in a suit to modify the parent

- child relationship . He requests that we direct respondent, the Honorable K. Randall Hufstetler , to vacate the order and gr ant a new trial. 1 Because the trial court has signed a final order in the

1 The underlying case is In the Interest of H.C.C., a Child , Cause No . 68312, in the 300th District Court of Brazoria County, Texas, the Honorable K. Randall Hufstetler presiding.2

underlying proceeding, relator has an adequate remedy by appeal. See T EX . F AM . C ODE A NN . § 109.002(b) (West 2014); In re Moore , No. 05

- 14

- 01173

- CV , 2016 WL 80205, at *6 (Tex. App.

— Da llas Jan. 7, 2016, orig. proceeding ) (cit ations omitted) ; In re Harrell , No. 01

- 13

- 00517

- CV, 2014 WL 866044, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] Mar. 4, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (citations omitted)
. 2 Accordingly, we d eny the p etition
. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Lloyd.

2 In an issue in his petition, relator contends that he does not have an adequate remedy at law because portions of the electronically recorded trial court proceedings are inaudible. Relator may raise his contentions that the reporter’s record is incomplete or inaccurate in an appeal from the trial court’s order. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 34.6(e), (f); see, e.g. , Akinwamide v. Trans. Ins. Co. , No. 01

- 15

- 00066

- CV, 2016 WL 3662696, at *8 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] July 7, 2016, no. pet. h.); Villagomez Invs. , L.L.C. v. Magee , 294 S.W.3d 687 , 689

– 90 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2009, no pet.).
# EUR-Lex - 32003R0174 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32003R0174

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 174/2003 of 30 January 2003 fixing the maximum export refund on common wheat in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 899/2002 **

*
Official Journal L 026 , 31/01/2003 P. 0031 - 0031 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 174/2003

of 30 January 2003

fixing the maximum export refund on common wheat in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 899/2002

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 of 30 June 1992 on the common organisation of the market in cereals(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1666/2000(2),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals(3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1163/2002(4), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1324/2002(5), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) An invitation to tender for the refund on exportation of common wheat to all third countries with the exclusion of Poland, Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 899/2002(6), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2331/2002(7).

(2) Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 provides that the Commission may, on the basis of the tenders notified, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 23 of Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92, decide to fix a maximum export refund taking account of the criteria referred to in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95. In that case a contract is awarded to any tenderer whose bid is equal to or lower than the maximum refund.

(3) The application of the abovementioned criteria to the current market situation for the cereal in question results in the maximum export refund being fixed at the amount specified in Article 1.

(4) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For tenders notified from 24 to 30 January 2003, pursuant to the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 899/2002, the maximum refund on exportation of common wheat shall be EUR 12,90/t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 31 January 2003.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 January 2003.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 181, 1.7.1992, p. 21.

(2) OJ L 193, 29.7.2000, p. 1.

(3) OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7.

(4) OJ L 170, 29.6.2002, p. 46.

(5) OJ L 194, 23.7.2002, p. 26.

(6) OJ L 142, 31.5.2002, p. 11.

(7) OJ L 349, 24.12.2002, p. 19.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5
       
<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                     DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                            16,925,823
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      2,400,553
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  18,154,404
<PP&E>                                             1,651,054
<DEPRECIATION>                                     1,240,555
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    19,778,155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                385,498
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                             152,158
<OTHER-SE>                                        19,625,997 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      19,392,657
<SALES>                                              278,882
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     398,882
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   1,305,468
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    11,751
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (918,337)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (918,337)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0 
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (918,337)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (0.09)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1


                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Charles M. Weaver, certify that:

         1.       I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on
                  Form 10-D (the "Exchange Act periodic reports") required to
                  be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
                  Form 10-K of the Corporate Backed Callable Trust
                  Certificates, J.C. Penney Debenture-Backed Series 2006-1
                  Trust (the "Trust");

         2.       Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
                  taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a
                  material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
                  make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
                  under which such statements were made, not misleading with
                  respect to the period covered by this report;

         3.       Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution servicing and
                  other information required to be provided under Form 10-D
                  for the period covered by this report is included in the
                  Exchange Act periodic reports;

         4.       Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement
                  required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB,
                  and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic
                  reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
                  the servicing or similar agreement in all material respects;
                  and

         5.       All of the reports on assessment of compliance with
                  servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their
                  related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with
                  servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
                  be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of
                  Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
                  been included as an exhibit to this report, except as
                  otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
                  of noncompliance described in such reports have been
                  disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National
Association, as Trustee.

Date: March 21, 2007

/s/ Charles M. Weaver
-------------------------
Name:   Charles M. Weaver
Title:  Senior Vice President
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Infrax Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul J. Aiello, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:





The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: September 26, 2012








/s/ Paul J. Aiello


Paul J. Aiello,


Principal Executive Officer