alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**WAMU ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORP.**

** **

**RESTATED OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

 

I, Thomas G. Lehmann, certify that:

 

1.         I have reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of theperiod covered by this report on Form 10–K of WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-AR17 Trust (the ‘‘Exchange Act periodic reports’’);

 

2.         Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement ofa  material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.         Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form10–D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.         Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB,and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material respects; and

 

5.         All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their relatedattestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as anexhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K. 

 

 

Date:  As of March 15,2007

|   |   | /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann                                                                        |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Name:  ThomasG. Lehmann                                                                 |
|   |   | Title:   President and Senior Officer in Charge of Securitization of the Depositor |
#### SMART MODULAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellant v. NETLIST, INC., Appellee

2016-2666

2016-2667

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

November 14, 2017

Michael Francis Heafey, Troutman Sanders LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by Anup M. Shah, Charlotte, NC.

Thomas J. Wimbiscus, McAndrews, Held *&*Malloy, Ltd., Chicago, IL, argued for appellee. Also represented by Wayne Bradley, Scott P. McBride, Gregory Schodde, Ronald Spuhler.

*987(Prost, Chief Judge, Wallach and Hughes, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Agusto LAZO-AGUIRRE, also known as Natividad Aparic Aguirre, also known as Agusto Lazo Aguire, also known as Juan J. Perez, also known as Natividad A. Aguirre, also known as Natividad A. Aparicio, also known as Jose O. Pineda, also known as Aguirre Natividad, also known as Natividad Aguirre-Aparicio, also known as Brigido Aparicio, also known as Agusto Brigido Aparicio, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-20467 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 5, 2017

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Agusto Lazo-Aguirre, Pro Se

Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Agusto Lazo-Aguirre has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lazo-Aguirre has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.5



January 10, 2002


Netvertise Development Corp.
2801 N.E. 208th Terrace
2nd Floor
Miami, FL 33180

Re:   Contribution to Capital Agreement

Gentlemen:

This will confirm the agreement of Netvertise, Inc. to contribute to the capital
of Netfran Development Corp. the outstanding account receivable of Netfran
Development Corp. in the amount of $488,041 immediately prior to our
distribution of Netfran Development Corp. common stock to our stockholders of
record as of July 31, 2001.

Please indicated below your agreement to accept such contribution to capital by
signing where indicated below and returning for our records, at which time this
shall be a binding and irrevocable agreement between us.

                                           Very truly yours,

                                           NETVERTISE, INC.


                                           By: /s/ ELLIOT KRASNOW
                                              --------------------------------
                                                   Elliot Krasnow, President




THE ABOVE IS AGREED:

NETFRAN DEVELOPMENT CORP.


By: /s/ ELLIOT KRASNOW
   ---------------------------
        Elliot Krasnow
        President
EXHIBIT 15.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements: (1) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-147682) pertaining to the Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. 2006 Long Term
Incentive Plan, and

(2) Registration Statement (Form F-3 No. 333-150682) and related prospectus and prospectus supplements of Teekay
Offshore Partners L.P. for the registration of up to $750,000,000 of its common units; of our reports dated April 11, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Teekay Offshore Partners
L.P. and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Teekay Offshore Partners
L.P. and subsidiaries, included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2010. Vancouver, Canada
    
    /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLPApril 11, 2011
    
    Chartered Accountants
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 209 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 209

 To provide for the approval of interim regulations applicable to the 
Senate and the employees of the Senate and adopted by the Board of the 
 Office of Compliance before January 23, 1996, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 22, 1996

 Mr. Dole submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To provide for the approval of interim regulations applicable to the 
Senate and the employees of the Senate and adopted by the Board of the 
 Office of Compliance before January 23, 1996, and for other purposes.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. APPROVAL OF INTERIM REGULATIONS.

    (a) In General.--The interim regulations applicable to the Senate 
and the employees of the Senate that were adopted by the Board of the 
Office of Compliance before January 23, 1996, are hereby approved until 
such time as final regulations applicable to the Senate and the 
employees of the Senate are approved in accordance with section 304(c) 
of the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1384(c)).
    (b) Construction.--Nothing in subsection (a) shall be construed to 
affect the authority of the Senate under such section 304(c).
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

October 23, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00640

- CR

Eduardo REYES, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR0808 Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

T he trial court signed a certification dated September 9, 2015, that states the underlying
case “is not a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has the right of appeal.” However, the clerk’s
record shows this is a plea

- bargain case.

Accordingly, the trial court’s certification of defendant’ s right of appeal is defective. See
Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) ; Sanchez v. State , 109 S.W.3d 760 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, no pet.).

We OR DER the trial court to amend the certification and cause the trial court clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the amended certification within TWENTY DAYS
from the date of this order. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(f).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Al varez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 23rd day of October, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6297 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6297

             To reauthorize the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 14, 2016

 Mr. Royce (for himself, Mr. Engel, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, Mr. Deutch, Mr. 
 Poe of Texas, and Mr. Hoyer) introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the 
 Committees on Financial Services, the Judiciary, Ways and Means, and 
   Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To reauthorize the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Iran Sanctions Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF IRAN SANCTIONS ACT OF 1996.

    Section 13(b) of the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-
172; 50 U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended by striking ``December 31, 2016'' 
and inserting ``December 31, 2026''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Ronald MCCLARY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Belquis HOPKINS, Lead Nurse; David Mitchell; Anthony D. Searles, Defendants-Appellees, and Eaves, Nurse, Defendant.

No. 17-7034

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 30, 2018

Decided: February 1, 2018

Ronald McClary, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald McClary seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to recuse and his motion for leave to seek evidence, construed as a motion for discovery. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Ind*
      *141
      *us. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order McClary seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. *See Nicholas v. Wyndham Int’l, Inc.,*373 F.3d 537, 541 (4th Cir. 2004) (order denying discovery); *In re Va. Elec. & Power Co.,*539 F.2d 357, 363-64 (4th Cir. 1976) (recusal). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Omar MIRELES-GAONA, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-40488 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed November 7, 2017

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Omar Mireles-Gaona, Pro Se

Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

*374PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Omar Mireles-Gaona has moved for leave to withdraw and' has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mireles-Gaona has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Onyx Acceptance Corporation
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Don P. Duffy, EVP, CFO and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  |                                                                                                          
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ DON P. DUFFY                                                                                         
| |  |                                                                                                          
| |  | Name: Don P. Duffy
Title: Executive Vice President,CFO and Principal Financial Officer
Date: May 15, 2003

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
and not for any other purpose.
#### Lesley BARR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VIRGINIA ALCOHOL BEVERAGE CONTROL (VABC); Laura Kate Sheehan, Regional Manager (VABC); Beverly Anderson, Employee (VABC), Defendants-Appellees, Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Incorporated, Amicus Supporting Appellant.

No. 17-2016

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 30, 2018

Decided: February 1, 2018

Lesley Barr, Appellant Pro Se. Sarah Flynn Robb, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Omar Francisco Gonzalez-Pagan, New York, New York, Sharon M. McGowan, Washington, D.C., Gregory R. Nevins, LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND, INC., Atlanta, Georgia, for Amicus Curiae.

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lesley Barr seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing her civil rights action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” *Bowles v. Russell,*551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on July 28, 2017. The notice of appeal was filed on August 30, 2017. Because Barr failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We deny amicus counsel’s mo*142tion to file a reply brief. We grant Barr’s motion to supplement, the record. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ PLAYVUU, INC., Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

SNAP INC., Defendant

- Appellee

______________________
2024

- 1364

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 2:22

- cv

- 06019

- GW

MRW
, Judge George H. Wu.

______________________ O R D E R The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that: (1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fe d. R. App. P. 42 (b). Case: 24-1364 Document: 11 Page: 1 Filed: 03/07/2024P LAYVUU , I NC

. V

. S NAP I NC

. 2

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

March 7, 2024 Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: March 7, 2024 Case: 24-1364 Document: 11 Page: 2 Filed: 03/07/2024
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Frank Charles SPEZZANO, III, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40275 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 20, 2017

Tracey M. Batson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Texas, Plano, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Frank Charles Spezzano, III, Pro Se

Before JONES, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Frank Charles Spezzano, III, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Spez-zano has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue *258for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### David Glenn GREEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Justin ANDREWS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-7194

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 30, 2018

Decided: February 2, 2018

*171David Glenn Green, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Glenn Green, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. *Green v. Andrews,*No. 5:16-hc-02156-FL (E.D.N.C. June 1, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Order filed July 09, 2012 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-11-00669-CR

ROGER CHARLES BRIDGES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 434th Judicial District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 11-DCR-056228

ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(f) and 

34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State's Exhibit #1 (CD).

The clerk of the 434th Judicial District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk of this court the 

original of State's Exhibit #1 (CD), on or before July 19, 2012. The Clerk of this court is directed to 

receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their

inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to return the original of State's Exhibit #1 (CD), to the 

clerk of the 434th Judicial District Court.

PER CURIAM
# AVS

Quality Management System Title: Domestic New Action Worksheet with 58 QPM# AIR-ANM-Q30-F7

, Date: qecel11ber 17,2008 

# I Revision 1


## Record ofContacts FDMS Docket No. FAA-3ll@2QIQ-

# 03"6I With whom outside theFAA has this proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA,iRAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization Person C~mtacte Date Boeing Richard Brooks 4/17/2009 

### ATA Joe White I 7/15/09 I

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNL ADED Check the Master List to Verify ThaI This isthe Correct Revision Before Use