alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 17 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 17

    Naming the CVN-76 aircraft carrier as the U.S.S. Ronald Reagan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 13 (legislative day, January 10), 1995

   Mr. Kempthorne (for himself, Mr. Warner, Mr. Dole, Mr. Craig, Mr. 
McCain, Mr. Mack, Mr. Smith, Mr. Lott, Mr. Nickles, Mrs. Hutchison, Mr. 
Thurmond, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Santorum, Mr. Heflin, Mr. Simpson, Mr. Coats, 
  Mr. Kyl, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Cochran, and Mr. Robb) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Naming the CVN-76 aircraft carrier as the U.S.S. Ronald Reagan.

Whereas President Ronald Reagan served his country with honor and distinction as 
        the 40th President of the United States;
Whereas President Reagan initiated defense policies that restored the military 
        power and prestige of the United States;
Whereas President Reagan's policy of peace through strength, invigorated by an 
        increase and strengthening of the Armed Forces of the United States 
        under his leadership, led to the demise of Soviet bloc communism and the 
        expansion of democracy around the world;
Whereas President Reagan made a lifelong commitment to rallying the free world 
        to support men and women elsewhere around the world who are struggling 
        to obtain freedom and democracy;
Whereas President Reagan in every way honored the men and women who have 
        volunteered to wear the uniforms of the Armed Forces of the United 
        States;
Whereas President Reagan kept faith with the men and women veterans of service 
        in the Armed Forces of the United States;
Whereas President Reagan served as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the 
        United States with unmatched dignity, style, and grace;
Whereas President Reagan supported a strong Navy and a global United States 
        military presence; and
Whereas President Reagan paid homage to, and symbolized, the American Dream: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the CVN-76, a nuclear 
powered aircraft carrier of the Navy, shall be named the U.S.S. Ronald 
Reagan.
                                 <all>
```
October 27th, 2015 Ryan Koverman Windy City Drones 450 Village CreekDr. Lake in the Hills, IL 60156 (630) 635-8020 U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 1200New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001 RE: FAA sUAS Request for Amendmentto ExemptionNo. 12266
Dear SirorMadam; Windy City Drones, LLC was previously issued an exemption, Regulatory DocketNo. FAA-2015-2116, Exemption No. 12266 for the purpose ofaerial data collection. We hereby respectfully request an amendment to this exemption for the purpose ofadding the following sUAS:
DJI Inspire 1 DJI Spreading Wings SIOOO (with A2 Flight Controller) Windy City Drones, LLC refers the FAA to its original Petition for Exemption for a listing of the regulations for which an exemption is being sought, a demonstration ofthe public interest, and a showing ofan equivalent level ofsafety. There have been no changes in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original Exemption. Please feel free to contactus ifyou should have any questions orconcerns regarding the requested amendment.

Ryan A. Koverman President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      12,352,771
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,473,296
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (82,346)
<INVENTORY>                                 12,308,082
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,285,444
<PP&E>                                       6,512,075
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,218,625
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,790,584
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        69,440
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,584,632
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,218,625
<SALES>                                     18,408,121
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,175,196
<CGS>                                        9,382,995
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,964,010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,030,299
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (331,530)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,129,422
<INCOME-TAX>                                   451,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   678,322
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Yolanda Merari RAXIC-CARRETO, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 14-70731

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed December 28, 2017

Eduardo A. Paredes, Attorney, Law Office of Eduardo A. Paredes, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner

Gregory Darrell Mack, Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, OIL, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P, 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Yolanda Merari Raxic-Carreto, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for re*406view from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. *Silaya v. Mukasey,*524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny the petition for review.

The record does not compel the conclusion that Raxic-Carreto established extraordinary or changed circumstances to excuse her untimely asylum application. *See*8 C.F.R. §§ 1208.4(a)(4), (5); *Toj-Culpatan v. Holder,*612 F.3d 1088, 1091-92 (9th Cir. 2010). Thus, Raxic-Carreto’s asylum claim fails.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Raxic-Carreto failed to demonstrate a nexus between the harm she fears and a protected ground. *See Zetino v. Holder,*622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (applicant’s “desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random violence by gang members has no nexus to a protected ground”), Thus, Raxic-Carreto’s withholding of removal claim fails.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid*406ed by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned executive officers of Mayflower Bancorp, Inc. (the Registrant) hereby certify that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By:

/s/ Edward M. PrattName: Edward M. PrattTitle: President and Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ Maria VafiadesName: Maria VafiadesTitle: Chief Financial Officer


Date: July 21, 2009
Request for a memo 

 12/16/2011 04:49 PM 

 

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

 

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

 

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Hi Bob, 

Can you send us this memo referenced on page 441 of the redline: 

“The Impact of Emission Averaging Time on the Stringency of an Emission 

Standard” 

 

Thanks, 

Cortney
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Daniel G. Smith, certify that:l. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed inrespect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 2006-A(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to beprovided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Actperiodic reports;4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on myknowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statementsrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreementsin all material respects; and5. All the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 ofRegulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Indenture Trustee,Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency, as subservicer, and Great Lakes Educational LoanServices, Inc., as subservicer.     Date:March 30, 2007 /s/Daniel G. Smith Daniel G. Smith    Senior Vice President    KeyBank National Association
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6138 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 560 East Pleasant Valley Road, Port Hueneme, California, as the U.S. Naval Construction Battalion ‘‘Seabees’’ Fallen Heroes Post Office Building. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 6138 EH

1 SECTION 1. U.S. NAVAL CONSTRUCTION BATTALION ‘‘SEA2 BEES’’ FALLEN HEROES POST OFFICE BUILD3 ING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 560 East Pleasant Valley Road, 

6 Port Hueneme, California, shall be known and designated 

7 as the ‘‘U.S. Naval Construction Battalion ‘Seabees’ Fall8 en Heroes Post Office Building’’. 

9 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg10 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

11 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

12 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘U.S. Naval Construc13 tion Battalion ‘Seabees’ Fallen Heroes Post Office Build14 ing’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 30, 

2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6138 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostHeroes Post Office Building. Naval Construction Battalion ‘‘Seabees’’ Fallen Road, Port Hueneme, California, as the U.S. al Service located at 560 East Pleasant Valley
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

 Thursday, March 24, 2022 at 10:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

                         Hybrid meeting: 1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC (12th floor) and virtual.                         *Note:*                         Due to the covid-19 pandemic, the FEC's hearing room remains closed to visitors for the near term as we implement procedures for the public to safely attend. If you would like to access the meeting, see the instructions below.                    

# STATUS:

                         This meeting will be open to the public. To access the virtual meeting, go to the commission's website                         *www.fec.gov*                         and click on the banner to be taken to the meeting page.                    

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the Democratic Party of Arkansas (A19-15)

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the Kentucky State Democratic Central Executive Committee (A19-13)

Management and Administrative Matters

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

 Judith Ingram, Press Officer Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

*Authority:*                         Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Laura E. Sinram,

Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2022-05857 Filed 3-16-22; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00290-CR

Angel VILLESCA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2007-CR-3494

Honorable Pat Priest, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 29, 2009

DISMISSED

The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that this case “is a plea-bargain case, and

the defendant has NO right of appeal.” Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure

provides, “[t]he appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of

appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). On June

3, 2009, we ordered that this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless appellant
04-09-00290-CR

-2-

filed an amended trial court certification showing that he had the right of appeal by July 6, 2009.

See TEX.R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174, 177 (Tex. App.—San

Antonio 2003, no pet.). No such amended trial court certification has been filed. Therefore, Rule

25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 779

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to require the arbitration of

initial contract negotiation disputes, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 9 (legislative day, MAY 1), 1995

Mr. SIMON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

A BILL

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to require the

arbitration of initial contract negotiation disputes, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Labor Relations First

5 Contract Negotiations Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. INITIAL CONTRACT DISPUTES.

7 Section 8 of the National Labor Relations Act (29

8 U.S.C. 158) is amended by adding at the end the following

9 new subsection:
2

•S 779 IS

1 ‘‘(h)(1) If, not later than 60 days after the certifi2 cation of a new representative of employees for the pur3 pose of collective bargaining, the employer of the employ4 ees and the representative have not reached a collective

5 bargaining agreement with respect to the terms and condi6 tions of employment, the employer and the representative

7 shall jointly select a mediator to mediate those issues on

8 which the employer and the representative cannot agree.

9 ‘‘(2) If the employer and the representative are un10 able to agree upon a mediator, either party may request

11 the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service to select

12 a mediator and the Federal Mediation and Conciliation

13 Service shall upon the request select a person to serve as

14 mediator.

15 ‘‘(3) If, not later than 30 days after the date of the

16 selection of a mediator under paragraph (1) or (2), the

17 employer and the representative have not reached an

18 agreement, the employer or the representative may trans19 fer the matters remaining in controversy to the Federal

20 Mediation and Conciliation Service for binding arbitra21 tion.’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 35.3

CERTIFICATION OF SERVICER PURSUANT TO ITEM
1123 OF
REGULATION AB

March 30,
2007

CIT Funding
Company, LLC
1 CIT Drive
Livingston, NJ 07039

Deutsche Bank
Trust Company Americas
60 Wall Street
New York, New York 10005

|           |                                    
|---------- | -----------------------------------
|Attention: | Corporate
  Trust & Agency Services
|           |  Structured
  Finance Services    

| |     |                                                                       | 
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| | Re: | Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as
  of October 1, 2006         | 
| |     | among CIT Equipment Collateral 2006-VT2, as
  Trust, CIT              | 
| |     | Funding Company, LLC, as Depositor, and CIT
  Financial USA,          | 
| |     | Inc., in its individual capacity and as
  Servicer (the Agreement). | 

I, Nicholas Michael Small, Assistant Controller of CIT Technology
Financing Services, Inc. (the Sub-Servicer), hereby certify that:

A
    review of the activities of the Sub-Servicer during the period from November
    22, 2006 through December 31, 2006 (the Reporting Period) and
    of the performance of the Sub-Servicer under the Agreement has been made
    under my supervision; and

To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Sub-Servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout the Reporting Period, except as described on Appendix B to the Sub-Servicer's Report on Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria Pursuant to Item 1122 of Regulation AB.

| |                                            |                               | 
| | ------------------------------------------ | ----------------------------- | 
| | CIT
  Technology Financing Services, Inc.,
| | as
  Sub-Servicer                         
| |                                            |                              
| | By:                                        | /s/ Nicholas Michael Small   
| |                                            |                              
| |                                            | Name: Nicholas Michael Small 
| |                                            | Title:   Assistant Controller

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Quincy John GOODSON, also known as Kidd, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-10038 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 20, 2017

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Quincy John Goodson, Pro Se

Before JONES, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Quincy John Goodson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Goodson has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th *Cir.*R. 47.5.4,