alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. The JEFFERSON MILLS, INC., Appellee.

No. 23078.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 13, 1966.

Loring W. Post, Atty., Dept, of Justice, Richard M. Roberts, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Meyer Rothwacks, Harry Baum, Attys., Dept, of Justice, Charles L. Goodson, U. S. Atty., Slaton Clemmons, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., Lee A. Jackson, Harry Baum, Attys., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Harold E. Abrams, M. E. Kilpatrick, Atlanta, Ga., Kilpatrick, Cody, Rogers, McClatchey & Regenstein, Atlanta, Ga., of counsel, for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and BROWN and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The question presented on this appeal is whether the trial court properly concluded, on motion for summary judgment, that payments by Jefferson Mills, Inc., a textile mill operating in the small town of Jefferson, Georgia, made to the Board of Education of Jefferson City under a contract by which the latter was obligated to upgrade the education in the city schools, constituted ordinary and necessary business expenses deductible in full under Section 162(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, or whether such payments were charitable contributions deductible only to the limited extent allowable under Sections 162(b) and 170 of the Code.

*393We have carefully considered the briefs and the record and find, as did the trial court, that there are no disputed issues of fact. We agree with the trial court that the payments made were made under a valid contract which inured to the benefit of Jefferson Mills and that the payments thus made were properly treated by the trial court as ordinary and necessary business expenses. We have carefully read the opinion of the learned trial judge, and we adopt in full his opinion and base our affirmance on the reasoning of that opinion. 259 F.Supp. 305.

The Judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,026,303
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  463,328
<ALLOWANCES>                                    33,506
<INVENTORY>                                    921,779
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,978,775
<PP&E>                                       3,745,470
<DEPRECIATION>                                 745,387
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,536,760
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          736,430
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,965,060
<OTHER-SE>                                     665,790
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,536,760
<SALES>                                      1,307,688
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,307,688
<CGS>                                        2,128,349
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,128,239
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                71,217
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             859,950
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,055,306)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,055,306)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.44) 
        

        


</TABLE>
----

Action brought on 24 March 2004 by Willem Goris against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-126/04)

(2004/C 118/107)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 24 March 2004 by Willem Goris, resident in Strassen (Luxembourg), represented by Nicolas Lhoëst, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court of First Instance should:

Pleas and main arguments

The applicant in these proceedings who, on his recruitment in September 1994, was classified in Grade B5, step 3, challenges the decision of the appointing authority classifying him, on revision, in Grade B4, step 2, and not in Grade B4, step 3, refusing to reconstitute his career and limiting the date of effect of the decision on his reclassification to 5 October 1995.

The pleas raised are identical to those in Case T-125/04 Rousseaux v Commisison

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       8,205,057
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,708,865
<ALLOWANCES>                                    44,687
<INVENTORY>                                  4,047,782
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,027,316
<PP&E>                                       5,221,912
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,837,759
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,800,099
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,028,760
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    29,256,547
<OTHER-SE>                                (14,858,905)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,800,099
<SALES>                                      4,016,011
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,016,011
<CGS>                                        2,063,560
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,342,663
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             409,426
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,707,993)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,585
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,728,163)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.31)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 33.7



|                                                       |  |  |  |                      
|------------------------------------------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------
|[Letterhead of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association] |  |  |  | Wells Fargo Bank, NA 
|                                                       |  |  |  | Document Custody     
|                                                       |  |  |  | 1015  10thAvenue SE 
|                                                       |  |  |  | Minneapolis, MN 55014

ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA

Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Company) is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company has determined that the servicing criteria are applicable in regards to the servicing platform as of and for the period as follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended)
residential mortgage-backed securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006 for which the Company provides document custody services, excluding any publicly issued transactions issued by any government
sponsored entity (the Platform).

Applicable Servicing Criteria: The servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(1)(iv),
1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform (the Applicable Servicing Criteria). Management of the Company has determined that all other servicing criteria set forth
in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the Platform.

Period: As of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 (the
Period).

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following assessment of compliance with respect to the
Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. In performing this assessment, the Company used the criteria set forth by the Securities
and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.

3. Based on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has
complied, in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report
with respect to the Companys assessment of compliance as of and for the Period.



WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONBy:

/s/ Shari GillundName: Its:

Shari Gillund Senior Vice
PresidentDated:

February 29, 2008
EXHIBIT 31.01A

 

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Peter E. Kalan, certify that:

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of CSG Systems International, Inc.; |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date:  | October 23, 2014 |   | /s/ Peter E. Kalan                    |
|--------|------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |             |   | Peter E. Kalan                        |
|   |             |   | Chief Executive Officer and President |

 

 

 

1
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appellate case name: Azhar M. Chaudhary v. Victoria A. Mora and Kristie R. Salter

Appellate case number: 01-21-00352-CV

Trial court case number: 18-DCV-254442

Trial court: 434th District Court of Fort Bend County

The motion for en banc reconsideration is denied.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Peter Kelly

 Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack, and Justices Kelly, Goodman, Hightower, Countiss, 

Rivas-Molloy, Guerra, and Farris.

Justice Landau, not participating.

Date: December 13, 2022
# Official Journal C 10/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2014.010.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 10 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5714 January 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2014.010.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 10

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5714 January 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 010/01 | Initiation of proceedings (Case COMP/M.7018 — Telefónica Deutschland/E-Plus) (1) | 1 |
| 2014/C 010/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 010/01

Initiation of proceedings (Case COMP/M.7018 — Telefónica Deutschland/E-Plus) (1)

1

2014/C 010/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

2

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 010/03 | Euro exchange rates | 5 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 010/03

Euro exchange rates

5

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 010/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.7138 — ThyssenKrupp/Acciai Speciali Terni/Outokumpu VDM) (1) | 6 |
| 2014/C 010/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.7127 — Carlyle/MDP/Chesapeake/MPS) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 7 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2014/C 010/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.7138 — ThyssenKrupp/Acciai Speciali Terni/Outokumpu VDM) (1)

6

2014/C 010/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.7127 — Carlyle/MDP/Chesapeake/MPS) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
----

**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

| (1)    | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period                ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements                of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15                U.S.C.                78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| (2)    | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company.                                                                                                                                            |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 11676]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the exhibition “In America: An Anthology of Fashion” at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

      ( print page 14086)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Stacy E. White,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2022-05159 Filed 3-10-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
EXHIBIT 99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carl J.
Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                           /s/ Carl J. Johnson
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Carl J. Johnson
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


Dated August 14, 2002
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 18

- 00843

- CV

In re Kirk Wayne McBride, Sr.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52. 8(a).

_______________________ ___________________

Edward Smith , Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Kelly and Smith

Filed: May 22, 2019
EXHIBIT 15.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the following Registration Statements of Teekay Offshore Partners L.P.:



|(1) | No. 333-147682 on form S-8 pertaining to the Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan;
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | No. 333-174221 on form F-3 and related prospectus and for the registration of up to $750,000,000 of its common units representing limited partnership units;
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(3) | No. 333-175685 on form F-3 and related prospectus for the registration of 713,226 common units;
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(4) | No. 333-178620 on form F-3 and related prospectus for the registration of 7,122,974 common units.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our reports dated April 23, 2012, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. and subsidiaries, and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. and subsidiaries, included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2011.



|                  |  |                      
|----------------- |  | ---------------------
|Vancouver, Canada |  | /s/ KPMG LLP         
|April 23, 2012    |  | Chartered Accountants
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 22 Referred in House (RFH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 22

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 6, 1995

          Referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 

Whereas there was international concern expressed at the Rio Conference of 1992 
        about conservation of the seas;
Whereas 1998 has been declared the ``International Year of the Ocean'' by the 
        United Nations in an effort to alert the world to the need for improving 
        the physical and cultural assets offered by the world's oceans;
Whereas the theme of Expo '98 is ``The Oceans, a Heritage for the Future'';
Whereas Expo '98 has a fundamental aim of alerting political, economic, and 
        public opinion to the growing importance of the world's oceans;
Whereas Portugal has established a vast network of relationships through ocean 
        exploration;
Whereas Portugal's history is rich with examples of the courage and exploits of 
        Portuguese explorers;
Whereas Portugal and the United States have a relationship based on mutual 
        respect, and a sharing of interests and ideals, particularly the deeply 
        held commitment to democratic values;
Whereas today over 2,000,000 Americans can trace their ancestry to Portugal; and
Whereas the United States and Portugal agreed in the 1995 Agreement on 
        Cooperation and Defense that in 1998 the 2 countries would consider and 
        develop appropriate means of commemorating the upcoming quincentennial 
        anniversary of the historic voyage of discovery by Vasco da Gama: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the United States should fully participate in Expo '98 in Lisbon, 
Portugal, and encourage the private sector to support this worthwhile 
undertaking.

            Passed the Senate September 5, 1995.

            Attest:

                                             KELLY D. JOHNSTON,

                                                             Secretary.
```