# 1i1N
U.S. Department of Energy June 1999 

### National Energy Savings (NES) and Shipments for Clothes Washers lntroduction The NES spreadsheet calculates both energy savings and national economic benefits. The national energy savings is the aggregate energy savings due to a higher energy efficiency standard. In other words, it is the difference in the energy needed for the nation to do laundry before and after a higher efficiency standard. To. estimate the energy·savings through the year 2030 due to r,evised standards, the energy consumption ofwashers (including dryer energy) under the base case scenario is compared to the energy consumptiori in an alternate scenario in which washers comply with a new standard. The NES spreadsheet also calculates the net present value (NPV). This is the benefit in operating costs due to savings in energy and water (both discounted, i.e., converted to "present value") minus the increase in first cost ofa more efficient washer. A positive net present value results whenthe presentvalue ofbenefits exceeds the present value ofcosts. This report describes the results obtained after making changes to the NES spreadsheet model and revising some inputs, as recommended in comments received after the publication ofthe Supplemental Advance Notice ofProposed Rulemaking (ANOPR). The new shipment spreadsheet model and results are also discussed in this report because shipments ofclothes washers is a critical input into the NES analysis. There are three basic outputs from this analysis: • Shipments are forecasted for the base case and nine possible standard levels. • The annual and cumulative savings for energy and water are determined for the nation to the year 2030. • The net presentvalues (NPVs) are determined for each standard level based on average data for the nation. Changes to TheNationalEnergy Savings (NES)Analysis A summary ofthe changes made to the NES analysis are summarized in Table I. Some ofthe major changes include: l. Shipments
- In the Supplemental ANOPR, shipments from a previous analysis were used as a placeholder until the new shipment model, which is discussed briefly below, could be developed.



### I2. 

### Fuel site-to-source conversion
- Inthe supplemental ANOPR, a constant conversion factor was used. This has beenreplaced by a time series projection ofconversion factors, changing from year to year. 

### 3.. H-axis base case escalation rate - 

### In the Supplemental ANOPR 3% of 1998 shipments were expected to be horizontal axis (H-axis) and this share was projected to increase at 0.5% per year. Forthe NOPR, 6.25% of 1998 shipments were horizontal axis and three scenarios are analyzed for how this share will change in future: 0.25%, 0.5% and 0.75% escalation rate peryear,. 4. 

### Water andwastewaterprice escalation
- Forthe Supplemental ANOPR a placeholder escalation ratte of0% was used while data were being collected. For the NOPR escalation rates were based on whether the household had water and wastewater utility service orjust a water utility. Based on data for urban prices, water and wastewater prices were determined to escalate at 3.04% per year. ('Vhile expert opinion is that rural households have higher prices, the data available for a small number ofrural households connected to either a water orwastewater utility are not enough evidence to support a different assumption than the 3.04% peryear determined for urban households.) For households with water only (no wastewater connection), the escalatioo rate was 0.67%. Forthose households that have well ptimps and a septic 

### tank, the water price escalation is**d~:termined** by the increase in the price ofelectricity needed to pump the water. 1bis value is important for the NPV calculation in the NES model, as it affects the cost savings ofimplementing a standard level. A higher water escalation rate results in a higher NPV 5. 

### Manufacturer markup-Forthe Supplemental ANOPRthe shipment weighted average was used for the manufacturing markup. One value was used for all standard levels. Forthe NOPR, a range ofmanufacturermarkups were calculated for each standard level. The average ofthe range was used for the NES. This parameter is important 

### in both the shipment andNES models. Higher mmufacturermarkups result in a greater price differential between the base and standard case whichresults 

### in a reduction in shipments resulting 

### in decreased energy savings. The markup 

### has a very significant impact onthe NPV. For example, Figure 2 shows that because the percentage · range ofmarkups are large, the range ofNPV 

### sis large.

2

### T bl 1 Ch ,a e 

### . NES M d I d A l . anges m o e an na1ys1S Parameter ANOPR NOPR Shipments old shipment model1 data from new shipment model Fuel site-to-source conversion constant value conversion varies yearly and is generated by EIA's NEMS-EPCA2 program Fuel prices average from RECS 93 average ofmarginal prices determined from RECS93 Escalation offuel prices AE098 AE099 Fuel price extrapolation from 2020 LBNL method method used by EIA, consistentwith to 2030 new LCC methodology H-axis base case escalation rates 0.5% 0.25%, 0.5% and 0.75% H-axis base case sales 3% in 1998 6.25% in 1998**~** Water heater fuels electricity, gas, oil added LPG Water & wastewater price urban rates: $3.18 per 1000 gallons updated average for urban & rural: avg.= $2.66 per 1000 gals. (see LCC) Water & wastewater price 0% average from LCC is used - a ,escalation weighting of3.04% and 0.67% (see LCC) NPV & dollar savings based on electricity savings based on a U.S. mix offuel types used (electric water heater & electric for water heaters and dryers; dryer) consistent with LCC analysis Manufacturer markup most likely, one value for all Average ofnew range for each standard levels standard level JFuel prices average prices marginal prices Operating cost (or savings) based on electricity prices based on U.S. fuel mix for water heaters and clothes dryers, includes water savings 

### Changes to ShipmentsAnalysis
1For purposes ofthe Supplemental ANOPR, some values were put in as place holders until further analysis could be done. For example, it was assumed that the shipments for the standards and the base case were the same. 2 EIA approves use ofthe names NEMS (National Energy Modeling System) only to describe an AEO version ofthe model with out any modification to code or data. Since, in this work, there will be some minor code modifications, DOE proposes use ofthe name NEMS-EPCA for the model as used here. 

### 3Inthe Supplemental ANOPR, we discussed several different approaches to forecasting new washer sales. Inasmuch as the accounting model was the only approach that took price and operating costs into account, the Department selected it as the primary tool for forecasting shipments. The following factors are accounted for in the shipment projections: • Combined effects ofprice, operating cost, and features on annual U.S. shipments • Market segments (e.g., new housing, replacement decisions, non-owner adding a washer). • Decisions to repair rather than replace. • Purchases ofused washers. • Age categories ofclothes washers. The new model incorporates information from the recent ConsumerAnalysis, calibrated with updated information about historical purchases. Inthe Consumer Analysis, the Department ofEnergy (DOE) has gathered additional information about features ofclothes washers that influence consumers' purchase decisions and analyzed consumers' stated preferences. The changes are summarized in Table 2. Some major changes include: 1. 

### Elasticities
-- Calibrated price andoperating cost elasticities to historicaldata: The model nowincludes consumerresponsiveness to price and operating costs calibrated to historical clothes washer shipments. (See Shipments report for details). 

### Includedconsumer response to the front-loading feature: The model includes consumer response to the front loading feature adapted from the recent Clothes Washer Consumer Analysis. Inthe current analyses, we assumed that efficiency improvements of35% orhigher require a front loading type washer. This parameter does not affect efficiency standards below 35%. 

### Removedthe income elasticity: We assumed no income elasticity, for consistency with the Clothes Washer ConsumerAnalysis. The conjoint consumer analysis showed that income level did not have a significant effect onpurchase probability. 2. 

### Market Segments
-- The new shipmentmodel provides detailed accounting ofdifferent market segments and washer ownership categories. Previous shipment models accounted for only the new clothes washer market and the replacement market. The previous model assumed that a washer was replaced by a new machine when 

### itbroke down. The current model now accounts for a variety of other market dynamics including new versus used shipments, changes inrepair behavior, and extending the life ofmachines through extra repairs. 3. 

### Source of Elasticities
-- The current shipments model utilizes a wide range ofinformation to make the model reflect current consumer and market characteristics. The model uses the Clothes Washer 

### 4Consumer Analysis results for both the relative size ofthe features response, andto estimate the rate 

### at which clothes washer owners might drop out ofthe market. We use data from a 1996 survey by NFO Research Incorporated, prepared for the Association ofHome Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM), onthe proportion ofearly (discretionary) replacements, and the proportion ofnew versus used purchases. Also used are AHAMhistorical shipments and statistics on the recent (post 1994 standard) changes in mean clothes washer efficiency. Consumer Reports data on repair rates during the first five years ofthe clothes washer lifetime are used. 1hepurpose ofthese model enhancements is to provide the bestpossible estimates ofthe impacts of standards, consistent with the recent history ofwasher shipments, clothes washer market structure a.ind consumer preferences. The new shipmentmodel also allows for various user inputs and choices. Input choices include high, medium or low scenarios for price and features elasticities. See the Technical Support Document (TSD) appendix on shipments for more detail.



### 5

### T bl 2 Ch a e t 

## sh· an2es 

### o 1pmentA I . nalVSIS Parameter ANOPR NOPR Elasticities price price operating cost operating savings income top/front access feature Market Segments new housing starts net new housing starts existing homes early replacement market regular replacement market extra repair market homes without a clothes washer Houses who drop out ofwasher energy not accounted for energy accounted for
- assumes market laundry done at laundromat or elsewhere Model type accounting accounting with decision tree Source ofData Oak Ridge model and data based on input from historicalt.consumer refrigerators survey, conjoint analysis, and market share data from NFO Research, Inc. & Association ofHome Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) Source ofElasticities Price Elasticity (PE)
- from Oak Operatingsavings
- derived from Ridge equation historical sales before and after the Operating Cost (OC) elasticity- 1994 standard
- based on implied derived from implicit discount rate discount rate Income Elasticity
- from Oak Ridge Features elasticity- based on model conjoint analysis

.' Price elasticity
- with other (For theANOPR, a shipment parameters set, determined by analysis ·hadnotbeenperformedyet calibrating to historical data. andshipments were kept constantas aplaceholderpending future analysis)**Rc~sults** 

### EJ.riciency Levels andScenariosAnalyzed We analyzed the impact ofeachpossible standard level presented inthe Engineering analysis. These efficiency improvement levels are: 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 35%, 40%, 45%, and 50%. Both national energy savings and net present value ofthose savings (2003 to 2030 cumulative) were calculated. Unlike the LCC model, the NES does not use distributions ofvalues for inputs or outputs. Sensitivities can be demonstrated by running different scenarios. Each efficiency level was analyzed 

### 6for five scenarios. Some ofthe parameters that were varied are inputs to the shipment-model and some are inputs to the NES-model. Since shipments have an effect on the national energy savings, changes to the shipment inputs have a direct effect on the national energy savings. Changes in the input parameter affect the base case results as well as the standards case results. Results ofthe scenarios are plotted in Figure 1. The five scenarios are described below: lJ.pper BoundScenario (greatest energy savings) This scenario utilized parameters chosen to forecast an upper bound for shipments, energy savings and NPV. The low price elasticity allows more consumers to buy washers at a higher price. The low ' top/front elasticity increases sales for washers at the 35% efficiency level orhigher. A low manufacturer markup makes the washers more affordable allowing for more sales. High water and fuel prices produce a higher dollar savings and a higherNPV. LowerBoundScenario (least energy savings) Parameters in this scenario are chosen to provide a lower bound on shipments and energy savings. Lower shipments would be caused by higher price elasticity, high top/front load elasticity, and high manufacturer markup. Lower shipments in general mean lower opportunity ofenergy savings. In addition, low fuel and water prices would reduce the savings per washer and therefore the. total NPV. AJEO low growth assumes a lower economic activity (resulting in less demand for energy and therefore lower fuel prices). 0.25%H-axis Growth Scenario Tiris is a scenario where the mean values for most inputparameters are used, but rather than assuming a 0.5% H-axis escalation, a 0.25% annual H-axis growth (escalation rate) is assumed. This means that inthe base case scenario (i.e., without standards), the sales ofH-axis (assumed here to mean 35% ·efficiency improvement above baseline) will increase by 0.25% every year. This scenario increases the

energy savings and NPV over the reference case. 0. 75% H-axis Growth Scenario Iltis assumes that inthe absence ofnew higher efficiency 

### standards, the market share for H-axis washers increases linearly by 0.75 percentage points every·year starting in the year 1998. (See 0.25% H-axis growth rate). Reference Case Scenario Illis scenario uses medium or average values as parameter inputs and is bounded onboth sides by the other scenarios described above. This is considered the most likely scenario. Table 3 below outlines the input parameters used to generate the high and low bound sensitivities. All ofthe parameters inTable 3 together define the lower and upper bound scenarios for energy savings. Note that the base case H-axis escalation rate (an input to both the shipment and NES models) is also a parameter in the overall upper and lower bound scenarios.
7

### T bl 3 NES/Sh. t 

# s •t• •t• .a e 1pmen s ens1 av1 1es Parameter Lower Bound Upper Bound Applies to Result Affected {least shipments) (most Spreadsheets shipments) Energy Price Projection AEOlow AEO.high NES NPV economic economic growth growth Water Escalation Rate low water prices high water NES NPV prices :Base Case H-axis Escalation Rate 0.75% 0.25% Shipments, NES Energy Savings NPV J?rice Elasticity high low Shipments Energy Savings NPV Top/Front Elasticity high low Shipments Energy Savings**~PV** Manufacturer Markup high low Shipments, NES Energy Savings NPV Table 4 below shows the upper and lower bound for energy and water savings as well as the NPV. These bounds represent the sensitivities with the greatest range. Input parameters were chosen to produce a large range in shipments and thereby also a large range in energy savings. 

### T bl 4 Ra

a e neeo f 

### Enerev

# savmes an

### d NPV ti 

### E h St d d L I or ac an ar eve : Efficiency Improvement Energy Savings Water Savings Net Present Value (NPV) over the Base Case (Quads) (trillion gallons) (billion 1997$)**Bound~** lower upper lower upper lower upper 5% 0.29 0.32 0.43 0.47 0.91 1.74 10% 0.97 1.06 0.43 0.47 2.15 3.32 15% 1.81 1.98 0.42 0.46 3.38 4.91 20% 2.20 2.42 0.54 0.61 2.93 5.19 25% 4.14 4.59 9.32 10.34 8.19 26.16 35% 5.88 6.79 12.72 14.66 9.07 33.95 40% 5.92 6.83 12.72 14.66 9.1 I 34.01 45% 6.89 7.94 I0.28 12.27 5.09 26.33 50% 7.28 8.37 10.23 12.25 5.28 26.65
8Table 5 below shows results for when medium or mean values are used and only the H-axis escalation rates are varied. 

### Table 5 

### Results for Scenarios with 0.25% 

### and 0.75% 

### H-axis Growth Rates (all othervalues medium or avera2e) Efficiency Improvement Energy Savings Water Savings Net Present Value (NPV) over the Base Case (Quads) (trillion gallons) (billion 1997$)

Baseline H-Axis 0.25% 0.75% 0.25% 0.75% 0.25% 0.75% Escalation 5% 0.32 0.29 0.47 0.43 1.29 l.l7 10% 1.07 0.97 0.47 0.43 2.76 2.52

. 15% 1.98 1.80 0.47 0.42 4.24 3.87 20% 2.42 2.20 0.61 0.54 4.10 3.75 25% 4.58 4.15 10.31 9.34 15.73 14.30 35% 6.64 6.02 14.35 13.00 19.10 17.40 40% 6.68 6.06 14.35 13.00 19.15 17.45 45% 7.70 7.08 11.92 10.57 13.71 12.06 50% 8.11 7.49 11.88 10.54 13.95 12.31 Ta,ble 6 shows the results ofthe scenario with all parameters set at medium or average. This is intended to reflect the most likely value. 

### T bl 6 R ti

fl 

### e e erence 

## case- AllP

### arameters 

# set to Md" 

### e 1um orA

### vera2e Efficiency Improvement Energy Savings Water Savings Net Present Value (NPV) overthe Base Case (Quads) (trillion gallons) (billion 1997$) 5% 0.30 0.45 1.23 10% 1.02 0.45 2.64 15% 1.89 0.44 4.05 20% 2.31 0.57 3.93 25% 4.36 9.82 15.01 35% 6.33 13.67 18.25 40% 6.37 13.67 18.30 45% 7.39 11.24 12.88 50% 7.80 11.21 13.13 

### 9Fitgure 1below shows all five scenarios for all efficiency levels. The greatest range 

### inresults occurs at the 50% level. Forthis efficiency level, the upper and lower bound scenarios are within 7% ofthe reference case. ·

a· --S-lowerbound

- •- 0.25% H-axis escal.**~reference** 7

- •- 0.75% H-axis escal.

- upper bound

2

5 10 15 20' 25 35 40 45 50 Percent Efficiency Level Improvement**Fi1~ure** 1 

### Energy Savings in 

### Quads for Different Scenarios

10

### figure 2 shows NPV versus efficiency level. Here we see a much greater effect onNPV then for energy savings. The reason for this is the wide range 

### inmanufacturer markup and therefore price, which impacts the NPV directly.
40 35 30 

## «'• 

# ... 01 01 

### .... c: 25

### ~~**~~** GI 20 :1 iii :;:i• 

# ... c: GI Ill 15 GI 

## ... Q, 

## .... Cl• :z: 10 5 0 5 -e-NPVlower bound • _. • NPV 0.25% H-axis escal. -@-NPVreference

- • - NPV 0.75% H-axis escal. --e-NPV upper bound

10 15 20 25 35 Percent Efficiency Level Improvement 

### Fig;ure 2 NPV for Different Scenarios

11 40 

## -----.& 

# ·-----·

45 50Sfdpments Figure 3 below shows forecasted shipments to the year 2030 for standard levels from 20% to 50% and the base case. Results are for the reference case, i.e., input values are medium or average. Historical datapoints are also provided to showthat the model agrees with historical data.

New Clothes Washer Shipments**~ 5+-~~'--~~~~~~~~~+--~..__~~~~~~~~~~~---t**  c**~** 

### E**+='-T-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~---i** Q, 4 

### :a C"ll**o-t-~~r-~--.~~-.-~~--.-~~~~~~~--.~~-.-~~--.-~--1** 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 Year 

### Figure 3 Shipments for the Reference Case 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

12 + Historical -Baseline

__.,._ 20% Level --25%Level

......_35%/40% Level --45%Level -*- 50%Level

### DetailedNESResults More detailed results on energy and water savings are provided in Tables and Figures D.1
- D.52. Each ofthe following pages has two tables and one chart, all corresponding to the same efficiency level and sensitivity scenario. The charts show cumulative energy, water and cost saving for each standard level. Tables and figures are numbered as shown below: • reference case Tables D.1.1
- D.9.2 Figures D.1
- D.9 • 0.25% H-axis escalation Tables D.10.1
- D.18.2 Figures D.10
- D.18 • 0.75% H-axis escalation Tables D.19.1-D.27.2 Figures D.19-D.27 • Lower bound Tables D.28.1
- D.36.2 Figures D.28
- D.36 • Upper bound Tables D.37.1
- D.45.2 Figures D.37
- D.45

13

### a e 

# . . T bl D 11 0 

### 1c1ency 5% Effi . 

### L IE eve: nen?V andWater

# s .**avm~s**

# ii~~r~·**~a:; ~~:~~;~c'.~\tt~1~~** 

# .:.: .. 

### ,Water Total -Saving from 2003 (trillion gals) 

### to 2010 0.04 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.05 

### to 2020 0.16 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.23 

### to 2030 0.30 0.19 0.10 0.01 0.00 0.45
Ta.hie D.1.2 

### 5% Efficiency Level: Cost and Net PresentValues · ··.. ·Cumulative

### fol-Clothes 

## :washers'.'1rurcha8edJroni;1003tb

### 2030., :· 

## .-....,:'·.<.: · ··}:{niscounted,:at 7%·.toveai,1997:,(k

### hiiiiond9'~jJ ..

### -~foi1cifs)·J. ··' Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio
• includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer 

### 1.24 0.01 1.23 176

Cost and Saving of Clothes Washers

r!**~** Q i:::ir0\ 0\ ,.., 

### = 

## :S 

# = 2000 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 -0.05 2005 2010 c::::::J Price Change l!!!!!!!!I Energy &Water Saving --Net Saving

; 

### ,,, ,,, ,,, 

### ,,, 

### ,,, ; 

## ,,, 

# Al 2oi5 2020 2025 2030

... 

# -
...... 

## ... 

# -

.... ........ 

## ... .... 

## ... ... 

### ,,, 

## "

. \

-



### Fig;ure 

### D.l 5% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards 14 .Reference Case

### Table D.2.1 from 2003 to 2010 to 2020 to 2030 

### 10% Efficiency Level: Enen?Y and Water Savin1!S

0.13 0.54 1.02 0.08 0.31 0.58 0.04 0.20 0.39 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.02


### Table D.2.2 10% Efficiency Level: Cost and Net Present Values ..**W.~ter** :. ,;., ·\SaVUig'.::;'.**~;:;** (trillion gals) 0.05 0.23 0.45

·, ·(... ·Cunitilative:for

### CIOthes·w

## ashersJaiichased;from'20031 

### to:2030... : :· 

# :< 

# · .._.'.;·,_;·:..**~.:·J)i~bdiliitea~~k1~1%~i~f;vci~l{fl9~,-0fil~bi1IiSI1~1§9Jz?ah11)fr~)·:'.;~::t;:'.p~~::~·:**

# ..i:::

Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio •includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer

IC**~!! ~=** **~~** 

## ,, Cl\ Cl\ 

# ... ·=**~3** 

## 'a 2000 0.6 0.5 

### - 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 -0.1 Cost and Sa,·ing of Cloth<.'s \Vashers 2005 2010 . 2015 2020 2025 c:::::::J Price Change lililllEnergy & Water Saving
-.- Net Saving ... 

## ... "' 

# . .... 

## "' ; ,I ; ; 

### ,,. ,I 

### ,,. 

# Arfll;



# --**~** 

### 2.72 0.08 

### 2.64

32

2030



### FigureD.2 10% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards 15 Reference Case

### Table 

### D.3.1 from 2003 to 

### 2010 to 

### 2020 to 

### 2030 0.24 1.00 1.89 0.14 0.55 

### 1.02 0.09 0.40 

### 0.79 0.01 0.02 0.05 

### 0.00 0.02 0.04**T~1ble** 

### D.3.2 15% Efficiency Level: Cost and Net Present Values

Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/CostRatio *includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer Cost and Saving of Clothes Washers

r: .! 

### c 

# = r-. 

### °' °' 

# - c**~** i:i5 2000 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 -0.1 2005 2010 201s 2020 2025 c:::::J Price Change 1!!1111 Energy &Water Saving

-- Net Saving !; 

# ,,
... ;**~** ; 

# ,.**~** I**~** i**~** ;**~ ~**  

# u ' 

## .. (trillion gals) 0.05 0.23 0.44

4.49 0.43 4.05

IO

2030



### Figure D.3 15% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards 

### 16 Referer1;ce Case

### Table D.4.1 20% Efficiency Level: Enerl!V and Water Savings from 2003 to 2010 to 2020 to 2030 0.28 1.21 2.31 0.16 0.64 1.21 0.11 0.51 0.99 0.01 0.03 0.06 0.01 0.03 0.05


### Table D.4.2 20% Efficiency Level: Cost and Net Present Values (trillion gals) 0.06 0.29 0.57

··.,,·.' · .•**·>C~tiilltilatiV.e·'for{~lothes,Wtclllers~:eurcliased:'from~2oo:s~t0:2030~'':.:{,:;'** •·

### ~{ 

# .·'**·.·~·;::.~~-,;,I~DisBBhrit~a.~~t1%,tbN~~i;99·fifu:~Bill15~~F~9o/~f61i~~)':frJiilk:~~i:' {~** 

Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio •includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer

2000 1.2 1.0 0.8**I:~** .!! 0.6 c:**~I** r-. Cl', 0.4 Cl'. 

# .., 1:1**~t** 0.2 =1 0.0 -0.2 -0.4 Cost ancl Savi.ng of Clothes Washers 2005 2010 1,,.,..., Price Change lii!!iBEnergy & Water Saving

-- Net Saving

i-- 

## ,. 

# " " i-- 

## , i-- II 

## , ; 2015 2020 2025



## ... , 

# " , 5.47 1.54 3.93 3.5

2030



### Figure D.4 20% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due 

### to Standards 17 

### Reference Case

### T bl 

### D 5 1 25% Effi . a 

### e 

# . . 0 

### 1c1encv 

### L IE eve: nerev andW 

### t S . a er avmgs ,:...:r.:'..l."'..**:_~** .,:· ':·**·~** ... ·-·· .·-Energy**.~~~g** in**Q~s.,_?t,.:.:** -**~-** ·:..(.**·7,:~~** ',,. ,water'

·-....**;·;•:-,_~-·'...**...:... '·,· -·



## .**:·::~J\)fiiL.i.** ·. ,-Elec · :. -.Ga8 . 

# -.·:on: . .,.:.,· ' ,. - '
....,. J;;PG' .:::. Saving. 

### from 2003 (trillion gals)

to 2010 0.52 0.30 0.20 0.01 0.01 1.05 to 2020 2.26 1.20 0.95 0.06 0.05 4.98 to 2030 4.36 2.28 1.88 0.11 0.09 9.82


### Ta.hie 

### D.5.2 25% Efficiency Level: Cost and Net Present Values (:'·: ··**,~.;:\\:.:Gumtilafi~e~fo.t:c1dthes:.Wa.SJieI·s'~Rurcha5ed·froffr12001:to,2030J ,::»~·** **'i~~**

### -<:,~:>,::'.':i:~,,;.;~f¥Ji~~im.t~a\iat7%;'td·'.y~aH1997:ktrhillidh~1**99:7.:a6ii~~)~:;'.~r1:;:;;::~Js:·:::~** Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio •includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer Cost and**s~n-ing** of Clothes Washers

I: OI =§ Q r- 

### °' °' .... Cl 

## :3 

# = 2000 6.0 5.0 4.0



# . 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 -1.0 -2.0 2005 2010 cc::JPrice Change lii!!!I Energy & Water Saving

-- Net Saving



# .. 

# .. I-" 

# .. ... ml 

# .. ... 

# 'i:Ht. ; 

### '**~** 

### '**~** 

### ' ' 2015 2020 2025

"-: "-: "-:



### ... "-:


### ... .... 

## ...

..... 

# .. .. I;' ;"J

; ' ; ; : \


# - - 21.42 6.41 15.01

3.3



# .. i2030



# ..

- Fig:ure 

### D.5 25°/o Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards
18 

### Reference Case

### Table D.6.1 35o/o 

### Efficiency Levei: Enerev and Water Savin!!S from 2003 to 

### 2010 to 

### 2020 to 

### 2030 0.69 3.17 6.33 0.44 1.92 3.76 0.22 1.13 2.31 0.01 . 0.07 0.14 0.01 0.05 0.11


### Table D.6.2 35% Efficiency Level: Cost and Net Present Values

Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio •includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer Cost and Saving of Clothes Washers 2000 8.0 7.0 6.0 r! 5.0 ..! 

### -a 4.0 iQ ""'" 3.0 

### g:


### .... 

## = 2.0 

## :S . 

# = 1.0 0.0 -1.0 -2.0 2005 2010**~Price** Change lli!i!il1 Energy & Water Saving

-- Net Saving

m 

# 'i:.>.. f ;**~** ' ' c; 2015 2020 2025

' l 

### ! ' ' I ' i ' 

## .. (trillion gals) 

### 1.32 6.70 13.67

30.00 11.75 18.25

2.6

; 

### ' 2030

1


### Figure D.6 35% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due

## to Standards 19 Reference Case

### Table D.7.1 40% Efficiency Level: Enerey and Water Savin2s from 

### 2003 

### to 2010 

### to 2020 

### to 2030 0.70 3.19 6.37 0.45 1.94 3.80 0.22 1.14 2.32 0.01 0.07 0.14 0.01 0.05 

### 0.11.
TableD.7.2 40°/o Efficiency Level: Cost and Net PresentValues
Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio
• includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer Cost and SaYing of Clothes \Vashcrs

I! .!! c;**,:::~** I"• c' c' 

# ... ·=**~;** iii 2000 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 -1.0 -2.0 2005 2010 c:=JPrice Change liiiiiJEnergy_ & Water Saving

-- Net Saving



# . "' 

## ... "' 

## ... "' Ill ""' 

# it·-

.... I**~** j**~** 2015 2020 2025



# - - - 

# - - i- 

# - ... "' I-" 

## "' I"

'**~** 

### ' ' : 

### t**~** '**~** 

# - l**~** 

### (trillion gals) 1.32 6.70 13.67

30.10 11.80 18.30

2.6

2030



# - 

# - - i-



# -**Fii~re** 

### D.7 40% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards
20 Reference Case

### T:able D.8.1 from 

### 2003 to 2010 to 2020 to 2030 

### 45% Efficiency Level: Ene1"2Y and Water**Savin~s**
0.75 3.60 7.39 0.51 2.32 4.70 0.22 1.16 2.44 0.01 0.07 0.14 0.01 0.05 0.11


### Table D.8.2 45% Efficienc Level: Cost and Net Present Values

Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio
• includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer Cost and Saying of Clothes Washers

f .! 

### c Q I"'- 

### °' °' 

# - Cl**~** i6 2000 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 -1.0 -2.0 -3.0 2005 2010 c::::J Price Change r!!!!!i!!I Energy & Water Saving

-- Net Saving



### "" 

## ... ...**~** c. 

# \; j 

### • : i- .

## ... : 

## I 

# . I 'i- 

# ' l 

## ... i 

## I I i I 2015 2020 2025



## ... 

# - 

# -
... 

# .. ... ,, 

## "" ; 

# .. ,, 

## i l· 

### I 1

! ' 1 ! l .. I (trillion gals) 1.01 5.38 11.24

28.82 15.94 12.88

1.8**~** ' 2030

i


### Figure D.8 45% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to 

### Standards 21 Reference Case

### Table D.9.1 

### from 2003 

### to 2010 

### to 2020 

### to 2030 

### 50% Efficiency Level: Enel1!V and Water Savines

0.78 3.78 7.80 0.54 2.47 5.04 0.22 1.19 2.51 0.01 0.07 0.14 0.01 0.05 0.11


### Table D.9.2 50% Efficiency Level: Cost and Net Present Values

Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost NetPresent Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio •includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer Cost and Saving of Clothes Washc1·s



### 1: .!i i;**i:~** I:"• Ch Cl' 

# ... ll

### E~ iii 2000 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 

### o.o -2.0 -4.0 2005 2010 c:::iPrice Change fiii!!IEnergy &Water Saving

-- Net Saving



## ... 

# .. .. \1**~** --

# :

-- 

### ..... '**~** 

### ' 1 ;**~** ' i i 

### I.. ·

### ...**~ ~**  ; 

### , ( ' 

### l 1 

### ' l**~** l**~ ~**  '



# . 2015 2020 2025

.... 

### '
... loi... 

### ,,. ,,. i... 

# .. ' 

### (trillion gals) 1.00 5.34 11.21

29.60 16.47 

### 13.13

1.8



## .. 2030



# -

'



## .. Figure D.9 50% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards 

### 22 Reference Case

### Ta.hie D.10.1 from 2003 

### to 2010 

### to 2020 

### to 2030 

### 5% Efficienc Level: Ene and Water Savin s

0.04 0.17 0.32 0.03 0.11 0.20 0.01 0.05 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00


### Table D.10.2 5o/o 

### Efficiency Level: Cost and Net Present Values (trillion gals) 0.05 0.24 0.47

·.CUniiilative·for:CIOthes:W

### asliers.Puichased**=froni2003:"tif2030>'~~- .,g:~.\'**  

# :•..·

·:.;::..**:f1i~~oririi~<l-a:t~1,o/cfi-!6've~fi:997:-(fii;;:billi6~~it~9.~?a6ii~);r,;~L~~t'7~:~\~;:'** Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio •includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer Cost and Saving of Clothes Washers

f .!! 

### c**~** r-- Cl\ Cl\ 

# - c 

## :5 

# = 2000 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 -0.05 2005 2010 c::::JPrice Change li!liilEnergy & Water Saving

-- Net Saving



### ,,, 

# .. .. ,,, ,,, ,,, 

## ,,, ' 

# Arff 2015 2020 2025



# - ....... 

# - ... 

## ... ...... 

## ... ,,, 

# " "

. .. .. 1.30 0.01 1.29 176



## ...... 

# - 2030



## ...

Figure D.10 5% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards Sensitivity Scenario: 23 Increase Horizontal-axis share 0.25%peryear

### Table D.11.1 10% Efficiency Level: Ener!!V and Water Savin2s

from 

### 2003 to 

### 2010 to 

### 2020 to 

### 2030 0.13 0.55 1.07 0.08 0.32 0.61 0.04 0.21 0.41 0.00 0.01 0.02**~0.00** 

### 0.01 0.02
Ta.hie D.11.2 10% Efficiency Level: Cost and Net Present Values

Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio 

### * includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer

t! .!! 'Ci Cl t-• Ch Cl\ 

# ... 'l**~!** iii 2000 0.7 0.6 

### - 0.5 0.4 0.3 - 0.2 0.1 0.0 -0.1 ICost and Saving ofClothes Washers 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 1 ,_.,, 1Price Change

- Energy &Water Saving --Net**Sa~ng ~**  , ,,.. 

### "' 

## "" "' ,,,. 

## "' ,,,. 

## "' ,,. ,,,. 

## "' 

# A(

- 

# - - (trillion gals)



### 2.85 0.09 2.76

32



### " 0.05 0.24 0.47

2030



### Figure D.11 10% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards Sensitivity Scenario: 

### 24 Increase Horizontal-axis share 0.25%peryear

### Table 

### D.12.1 15% Efficiency Level: Ener!!V and Water Savin2s from 2003

to 2010 to 2020 to 2030 0.24 1.03 1.98 0.14 0.57 1.07 0.09 0.42 0.82 0.01 0.03 0.05 0.00 0.02 0.04
Ta.hie 

### D.12.2 15% Efficiency Level: Cost and Net PresentValues
Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio •includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer Cost and SaYing of Cloth<.'S Washers**~** .!! 

# = Q i- 

### °' °' .... 

## =**~** iii 2000 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 -0.2 2005 2010

, ,.,.,,,,Price Change lillilEnergy & Water Saving

-- Net Saving
I;' .; ""' ; I;' .; :; .; 

# d' LIU ,.**~** 201S 2020 2025

i.... 

### "" 

## ... .;**~** '**~** 

### (trillion gals) 0.05 0.24 0.47

4.69 0.46 4.24

10



## .. 

## .. 2030



## ..**Fi~~ure** 

### D.12 15% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards Sensitivity Scenario: 25 Increase Horizontal-axis share 0.25%peryear

### Table D.13.1 20% 

### Efficiency Level: Enen?Y and Water Savings 

### from2003

to 2010 

### to 2020 

### to 2030 0.29 1.25 2.42 0.17 0.67 

### 1.26

Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio 

### 0.11 0.53 1.04

•includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer 0.01 0.03 0.06 0.01 0.03 0.05

Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers 2000 1.2
- 1.0
- 0.8 t: .!!! c; 0.6 i::1

..... 0.4 o. o• 

### .... C:I**~!** 0.2 i:i:i 0.0 -0.2
- -0.4 2005 2010 c::::;:sJPrice Change -Energy 

### &Water Saving

-- Net Saving

I " 2015 2020 2025 

### (trillion gals) 0.06 0.31

5.73 

### 1.62 

### 4.10 3.5 0.61

2030



### Fig:ure D.13 20°/o 

### Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards 

### Sensitivity Scenario: 26 

### Increase Horizontal-axis share 0.25%peryear

### Table D.14.1 from 2003 

### to 2010 

### to 2020 

### to 2030 

### 25% Efficiency Level: Enere.v and WaterSavin!!S

0.53 

### 2.34 4.58 0.30 1.25 2.39 0.21 0.99 1.97 0.01 

### 0.06 0.12 0.01 

### 0.05 0.09 

### (trillion gals) 1.07 5.15 10.31


### Table D.14.2 25% Efficiency Level: Cost and Net PresentValues
Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit!Cost Ratio •includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer 

### 22.44 6.71 15.73



### 3.3

Cost and SaYing of Clothes Washers**I~** .!! c;**~~** r-- c, c' 

# ... n**~! ~i**  2000 6.0 

### s.o 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 -1.0 -2.0 2005 2010 c:::JPrice Change l!!!ii!i!i!I Energy & Water Saving

-- Net Saving



# . "" "" "'

.... 

# .. 

# •• .... 

# .. 

# 1Ht ; I i • ' ' l**~** )**~** 

## .. 2015 2020 2025 .

,... 

# .. 

# - .. ... 

## ... ... 

# ..

.... 

# .. ,,,.
.... ,,,. ,,,.**~** i ' I 

### ' 

### l j**~** '**~** ! 1 ' , • ; 1 I' 

## .. 2030



## ...



# - FigureD.14 25% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards 

### Sensitivity Scenario: 27 

### Increase Horitontal-axis share 0.25%peryear

### TableD.15.1 35% Efficiency Level: Ene11?Y and WaterSavines from 2003 to 2010 to 2020 to 2030 0.71 3.28 6.64 0.45 1.98 3.94 0.23 1.17 2.43 0.01 0.07 0.15 0.01 0.06 0.12


### Table D.15.2 35% Efficienc Level: Cost and Net Present Values

Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost NetPresent Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio •includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer Cost and SaYing ofClothes \Vashcrs 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 10.0 c::::JPrice Change 8.0 - Energy & Water Saving

-- Net Sa\1ng 6.0 r:: .!! 

### c: 4.0 i:1 I'-· er. er. 

### _, 2.0 Cl .5: :l 

### iii 0.0 - II 

### I -2.0 -4.0
- 

### (trillion gals) 1.35 6.93 14.35

31.36 12.26 19.10

2.6

2030



### Fig:ure D.15 35% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards Sensitivity Scenario: 28 Increase Horizontal-axis share.0.25%peryear

### Table D.16.1 40% Efficiency Level: Ener!!V and Water Savines from 2003 

### to 2010 

### to 2020 

### to 2030 0.71 3.30 6.68 0.46 2.00 3.98 0.23 1.18 2.43 0.01 0.07 0.15 0.01 0.06 0.12


### Table D.16.2 40% Efficiency Level: Cost and Net Present Values

Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio
• includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer Cost and SaYing ofClothes Washers

c:**~j** c' i::1 r"-· 1;1', 1;1', 

### _, c·**~·** 

### =:; 2000 10.0 

### - 8.0 

## - 6.0 4.0 

## - 2.0 

### - 0.0 -2.0
- -4.0 

### - 2005 2010 c::iPrice Change

- Energy & Water Saving --Net Sa\Ang

I"' 

# .. 

# .. • II 

### I I-**~**

### ~-**~** 2015 2020 2025



# . I-**~** .... 

# .. II"' ,,,. I-' 

# ..
' ' ' 

### ' ; ; 

### (trillion gals) 

### 1.35 6.93 14.35

31.46 12.31 19.15

2.6

2030

.... I- ....

' '


### Fig:ure D.16 40% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards Sensitivity Scenario: 29 Increase Horizontal-axis share 0.25%peryear

### Table D.17.1 

### from 2003 to 2010 to 2020 to 2030 · 45% Efficiency Level: Enerl!V and Water Savini?s

0.77 3.70 7.70 0.52 2.38 

### 4.89 0.22 1.20 2.55 0.01 0.07 0.15 0.01 0.06 0.12
Table D.17.2 45% Efficiency Level: Cost and Net Present Values (trillion gals) 

### 1.04 5.61 11.92


## i .

·.· ·.**~··** 

## .·**.Clinitilativeifob~Clothes'Wasliers** .PurchaSed**from~OOl:tt>l2.03o, ~:F'** **/'~-** 

# , ·. · ·,

",:;;**~ ·)ols66tllit~dtat'7.%~t6.v6~:ff99.7diirhili16if\19Qv~<l6lt~)}:;~~~'.;;7\:i:;i:.'.o**  Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio
• includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer 

### Cost and Saving ofClothes 

### \Vashcrs

t! .! 

# =**~** 

# ... °' °' 

# - = 

# s 

# = 2000 8.0 

### - 6.0 4.0 

### - 2.0 0.0 -2.0 -4.0 2005 2010 c::::::J Price Change -Energy & Water Saving

-- Net Sa\Ang



## ... .... I .... 

### "' 

# ll**~**.... ! ..**~I- ~**  .:**~** i**~ ~**  

### I > \**~** 2015 2020 2025

.... .... I- 

# - .. ... "" ,,.**~** 

# ..
1;. : l 

### " " ; 

# '**~ ~** 

### 30.12 16.41 13.71



### 1.8

I-**~**2030



# -

'


### Figure D.17 45% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to 

### Standards Sensitivity Scenario: 30 Increase Horizontal-axis share 0.25%peryear

### Ta1ble D.18.1 50% Efficienc Level: Ener 

### from 2003 to 2010 

### to 2020 itO 2030 0.80 3.89 8.11 

### 0.55 2.54 5.23 0.23 1.23 

### 2.62 0.01 

### 0.07 0.15 0.01 0.06 0.12


### Table D.18.2 50o/o Efficiency Level: Cost and Net Present Values
Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio *includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer

2000 10.0 8.0 6.0 z::**~I** C:• 4.0 i::1 t'-· O', o-. 

### _, 2.0
- C:l

..5: Ei 

### =1 0.0 -2.0 -4.0
- Cost and SaYing ofClothes Washers 2005 2010 c=;:JPrice Change 11!111!1Energy & Water Saving --Net**Sa~ng**

.. I 2015

I I; 2020 2025 

### (trillion gals) 1.03 

### 5.57 11.88

30.89 16.94 

### 13.95

1.8

2030**Fi~:ure** 

### D.18 50% Efficiency Level: Annual Costand Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards 

### Sensitivity Scenario: 31 Increase Horizontal-axis share 0. 75%peryear

### Table D.19.1 

### from 2003 to 2010 to 2020 to 2030 

### 5% Efficiency Level:**Ener~** 

### and WaterSavin2s

0.04 0.15 0.29 0.03 0.10 0.18 0.01 0.05 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00


### Tinble D.19.2 

### 5% Efficienc Level: Cost and Net Present Values

Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost NetPresent Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio
• includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer Cost und SaYing of Clothes Washers

i:: .!i 

### c: ,::, I"' 0-. o-. 

# ... =· C• ::1 ::1 r:c1 2000 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 -0.05 2005 2010 c:::zJPrice Change ril!i!!il Energy &Water Saving -Net Saving



# ,. ,,. ,,. 

## ,,. 

# , ,,. ,,. ,

# ~ 2015 2020 2025



## ...
...**~** 

### ,,. 

### ,,. 

# ,. (trillion gals) 0.05 0.22 0.43

1.18 0.01 1.17 176

2030



# -

Fii;ure D.19 

### 5% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards Sensitivity Scenario: 32 Increase Horizontal-axis share 0. 75%peryear

### Ta.hie D.20.1 10% Efficiency Level: Enemv and Water Savines 

### from 2003 1:0 

### 2010 to 2020 to 2030 0.12 

### 0.52 0.97 

### 0.08 0.30 

### 0.56 0.04 0.19 0.37 

### 0.00 0.01 

### 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.02
Table D.20.2 

### lOo/o Efficiency Level: Cost and Net Present Values

Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio •includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer

i: .!! c; QtCl\ Cl\ 

### .... c**~** 

# = 2000 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 -0.1 Cost and Saving of Clothes \Vashers 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 c::JPrice Change liilliEnergy & Water Saving

-- Net Saving


# .. .; 

# "' ; ; 

## ,, "' .;

- ; .; 

## "' 

# A(

......... (trillion gals) 0.05 0.22 0.43



### 2.60 0.08 2.52

32

2030



### Fig;ure D.20 10% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards 

### Sensitivity Scenario: 33 Increase Horizontal-axis share 0. 75%peryear

### T bl D 21 1 15°A Effi . a e 

# . . 0 

### 1c1ency 

### L 1 E eve: ner2V and 

# wt f' 

### a er**.~avme:s** Energy Saving 

### in Quads ·. Water Total Elec Gas 

### Oil LPG Saving 

### from 2003 (trillion gals) to 2010 0.23 0.13 0.09 0.01 0.00 to 2020 0.96 0.53 0.39 0.02 0.02 to 2030 1.80 0.97 0.75 0.05 0.04


### Table D.21.2 15% Efficiency Level: Cost and Net Present Values Cumul*!fve for.Clothes,WashersJ>urchased**f!<>P:f200~** to 

### 2030 Discourttedat

## 7%tc>:vearJ997(in

### .biiliort1997dollars) Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio *includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer

!'.! ..!! Ci**~** r- 

### °' °' .... 

### =**~** i:Q 2000 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 -0.1 • • j 

### €ostand Saving of €1othes**\~ashers** 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 c:=JPrice Change lll'i1iB Energy & Water Saving

-- Net Saving**~** 

# .. "' II ; I.I II ; I.I ;**~** II ,; Ii.I 

# "" LI 

## .. .. 4.28 0.41 3.87

10 0.05 0.22 0.42

2030



### Figure D.21 15% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards Sensitivity Scenario: 34 Increase Horizontal-axis share 0. 75%peryear

### Table D.22.1 20% Efficiency Level: Enen?V and Water Savings 

### Jrom 2003 

### to 2010 

### to 2020 

### to 2030 0.28 

### 1.17 2.20 0.16 0.62 

### 1.15 0.11 0.49 0.95 0.01 0.03 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.05


### Table D.22.2 20% Efficienc Level: Cost and Net Present Values

Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost NetPresent Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio "'includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer Cost and Saving ofClothes \Vashcrs 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 1.2 G::3 Price Change 1.0
- l!l!!!!!l!I Energy & Water Saving 0.8 -- Net Saving I: 

### .s 0.6
- Q**~** 

# ..

..... ...
...
... r-- 0.4**~** _. c**~** 0.2**~** 

### ,..

... 

## ,..

...

..... ... 0.0 -0.2 

# • ... 

# "tr; ' 

### ' l j n l 1**~ ~**  ·5 

### J -0.4 

### (trillion gals) 0.06 0.28 0.54

5.22 

### 1.47 3.75 3.5

2030



## .. Figure D.22 20% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards Sensitivity Scenario: 35 Increase Horizontal-axis share 0. 75%peryear

### Table D.23.1 from 2003 to 2010 

### to 2020 to 2030 25% Efficiency Level: Enen?Y and Water Savine:s
0.51 2.18 4.15 0.29 1.16 2.17 0.20 0.92 1.79 0.01 0.05 0.11 0.01 0.04 0.09 (trillion gals) 1.02 4.81 9.34
Ta.hie D.23.2 25% Efficiency Level: Cost and Net Present Values

Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio *includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer Cost and Sa,·ing ofClothes Washers 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 5.0**~Price** Change 4.0
- - Energy & Water Saving

-- Net Sa\1ng E! 3.0
- .!! "Ci Cl I:"· 2.0 Ch Ch 

# ... 'I**~~** 1.0
-**~i** 0.0 &I -1.0
- 

### 20.41 6.11 14.30

3.3

2030

... i- 

# -
...**Fi~:ure** 

### D.23 25% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards Sensitivity Scenario: 36 Increase Horizontal-axis share 0. 75%peryear

### Talt>le D.24.1 35% Efficiency Level: Enernv and Water Savine:s**:'"'.,;::.~** 

### · ,. ·. >. ·Energy'Saving·**iit.QWKis>.?:\r'yt~:~~.~-'**

### ·.:?. 

### wate.r. : .: 

## ;**~·;'Total :~1e** 

## 9. . :<".,

### .:o~

# ·:.;**.:.<:·.,:ofr:;:\~·;~::jii>,({.,;£** 

## .. :saVlng. .. ji·om 2003 to 2010 to 2020 to 2030 

### 0.67 3.06 

### 6.02 0.43 1.85 3.58

Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio 0.22 1.09 2.20 0.01 0.07 

### 0.13 0.01 

### 0.05 

### 0.11 (trillion gals) 1.29 

### 6.46 13.00

28.64 

### 11.24 17.40

2.5 •includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer Cost and Sa,·ing ofClothes \Vashcrs

I: .!! Q 

# =
..... OI OI 

# ... =**~** 

# = 2000 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 -1.0 -2.0 2005 2010 1 ..., .1 Price Change 1m11 Energy & Water Saving --Net Saving

i,. 

## "" i,. L..

.... 

# "' • L.. 

# l**:L..~ ~**  I v**~!** . i 

### . ! 2015 2020 2025 2030

.... .... L.. L.. .... ....

.... .... L. 

# "' [., v

·. : ' ; ' ' ., .! 

### .:**~** 

### Figure D.24 35% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards Sensitivity Scenario: 

### 3 7 Increase 

### Horizontal-axis share 0. 

### 7 5%

### peryear**T~1ble** 

### D.25.1 from 2003 

### to 2010 

### to 2020 

### to 2030 

### 40% Efficiency Level: Enerev and Water Savin2s

0.68 

### 3.08 6.06 

### 0.44 1.87 3.62 0.22 1.10 2.21 0.01 0.07 

### 0.13 0.01 0.05 0.11 

### (trillion gals) 1.29 6.46 13.00
Ta.hie 

### D.25.2 40°/o Efficiency Level: Cost and Net PresentValues
Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio
• includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer
Cost and SaYing of Clothes Washers 2000 7.0 6.0 

### s.o r: 4.0 .!!!**~- ~**  3.0 .,... 

## "' "' ';; 2.0 

## E i:i5 1.0 0.0 -1.0 -2.0 2005 2010 

## c::aPrice Change ,_Energy & Water Saving

-- Net Saving

I; ,; 

## ... ,,. 

# ..
... 

### "" 

## \i '**'i;~** 

# ! I ,,,..,**~ ~**  

# I
..... ' '**~ ~**  ; 2015 2020 2025



## ... 

# -

.. ... ... ... ...



## ... ; i.; ,; 

# I 28.73 

### 11.29 17.45



### 2.5



## ... 

# -

i 

## '**~** 2030

'**~ Fii~re**  

### D.25 40% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards 

### Sensitivity Scenario: 38 Increase Horizontal-axis share 0. 75%peryear

### Table D.26.1 from 2003 to 2010 to 2020 to 2030 0.73 3.49 7.08 

### Level: Ener and Water Savin s
0.50 2.25 4.52 0.21 1.12 2.32 0.01 

### 0.06 0.13 0.01 0.05 0.11 

### (trillion gals) 

### 0.98 5.14 10.57


### Table D.26.2 45% Efficiency Level: Cost and Net Present Values

Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost NetPresent Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio
• includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer Cost and SaYing

# ofClothes Washers 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 7.0 C::IJPrice Change 6.0
- -Energy & Water Saving 5.0 -- Net Saving r: 4.0 I- .! ... I3.0 I; 'E ,,. Q 

# "' r-. 2.0 

### ,,. 

### °' °' .... 

# ... ,,. 

### = 1.0 I; 

## :S 

# "' "' 

# =0.0 

# \ i 

## ! , .; ;i....

## t :; h -1.0 Ji; ;**'.-~"'** : l**~** l -2.0**~** -3.0 27.53 15.46 

### 12.06

1.8

2030



### Fig:ure D.26 45% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due

## to Standards Sensitivity Scenario: 39 Increase Horizontal-axis share 0. 75%peryear

### Table D.27.1 50% Efficiency Level: Ener2V and Water**Savin~s** 

### from 2003 to 2010 to 2020 to 2030**T~1ble** 

### D.27.2 0.77 3.67 7.49 0.53 2.41 4.86

Total Energy**~d** Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio 0.22 1.15 2.39

•includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer 0.01 0.06 0.13 0.01 0.05 

### 0.11

Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers



### 1: .!! c;**I!~** t"• C:\ C:\ 

# ... 1:**E~** ii3 2000 7.0 6.0 5.0 

## - 4.0 

# . 3.0 2.0 1.0 

### - 0.0 -1.0 -2.0 -3.0 2005 2010 

### c::a Price Change -Energy & Water Saving

-- Net Saving


## "" "' i..- "" 

# \i •**~~j ~**  ; j 

# It 

## '**~** ;,,.**~** 

## i**t~** ' ! ' >. 

## ! ..,., 

### ' I**~** 2015 2020 2025

.... .... 

### ... 1.-' 

### ,.. ""' ,,. 

# I 

# '' t 

# ' ( ! I 

### ! I 

## i**~** I I**~** 

### ! 

### ' i I i !I t**~** '- 

### •**~** 

### (trillion gals) 0.97 5.11 10.54

28.32 16.00 12.31

1.8

2030



# -

i**Fii~ure** 

### D.27 50% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards Sensitivity Scenario: 40 Increase Horizontal-axis share 0. 7 5%peryear

### Table D.28.1 5% Efficiency Level: Enerav and Water**Savin~s** 

### ·from 2003



### to 2010 

### to 2020 

### to 2030 0.04 0.16 0.29 0.03 0.10 

### 0.18

Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost NetPresent Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio 0.01 0.05 

### 0.10

•includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer 

### 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 

### 0.00

Cost and SaYing of Clothes Washers

f .!!! c; i:l r- 

### °' °' 

# - I: 

## E 

# = 2000 0.20
0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00
-0.05 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 1 ,.,.,,.,Price Change lBllEnergy & Water Saving

-- Net Saving .... 

# ..

.... 

## ... ,,,. ,,,.


### ... .,


### ... ,,,. ,,,. 

# Af (trillion gals) 0.05 0.23 0.43

0.92 0.01 0.91 96

2030



### Figure D.28 5% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards 

### Sensitivity Scenario: 41 

### LowerBound Case

### Table D.29.1 10% Efficienc Level: Ener from 2003 to 2010 to 2020 to 2030 0.13 0.52 0.97 0.08 0.30 0.56 0.04 0.20 0.37 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.02


### Tall>le D.29.2 10% Efficienc Level: Cost and Net Present Values

Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio
• in-:/udes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer

f.! .!! 

### c**~** """' 

### °' °' .... c**~** 

### i 2000 0.45 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 -0.05 Cost and**Savi1~g** of Clothes Washers 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 1**·,.,~-•Price** Change -Energy & Water Saving

-- Net Saving i,.

....**~** 

# . ...

..... 

## ...

.... 

## "

... 

# " "

...

# ~ uu**~** 

## .. (trillion gals) 0.05 0.23 0.43

2.25 0.11 2.15

21

2030



### Figure D.29 10% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to 

### Standards Sensitivity Scenario: 42 Lower Bound Case

### Table

### D.30.1 15% Efficiency Level: Eneri?Y and Water Savine:s**fi~om** 2003 

### to 2010 to 2020 to 2030 0.23 0.97 1.81 0.14 0.53 0.98 0.09 0.39 0.75 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.00 0.02 0.04
Table 

### D.30.2 15°/o Efficiency Level: Cost and Net Present Values

Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio
• includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer Cost and Sa,·ing ofClothes Washers



### 'C .! Ci**~** r-- 

## "' "' 

# ... I: 

# s**~** 2000 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 

### - 0.0 -0.1 

### - 2005 2010 C3JPrice Change

,...energy & Water Saving --Net Sa\t'ing 

# "' "' , i.... ,I i,..- 

## , i,..- ,I

### It

### LI ' I l 2015 2020 2025

lo- 

### "'

.... i,..-

,,**~**



# ' • i**~** !; !**~** 

# :**~ ~** 

:i ,; (trillion gals) 

### 0.05 0.22 0.42

3.84 0.46 3.38 8.4

2030

i 

### Figure 

### D.30 15% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards Sensitivity Scenario: 

### 43 LowerBound Case

### Ti1tble 

### D.31.1 20% Efficiency Level: Enere:v and Water Savin2s from 2003 to 2010 ilo 

### 2020 1to 

### 2030 0.28 1.17 2.20 0.16 0.62 1.15 . 0.11 0.49 0.95 

### 0.01 0.03 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.05


### Table 

### D.31.2 20% Efficiency Level: Cost and Net Present Values
Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio •includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer Cost and Saving of Clothes 'Vashrrs



### r: .!! 'Ci i::1 f'· o. o. 

# .., Cl**~!** C:i 2000 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 -0.2 -0.4 2005 2010 k·' '"·'Price Change

- Energy & Water Saving

-- Net Sa-.Ang

.... 

### ,. i.... 

### ,. 

## ,. "" ,. 

## \ ,,. , ' " 

## ,.., 2015 2020 2025



# .. ... 

# .. i....

,· 

### ' , 

### (trillion gals) 0.06 0.28 0.54



### 4.66 1.73 2.93 

### 2.7

•. ' 2030

'·**Fi~:ure** 

### D.31 20% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards Sensitivity Scenario: 44 

### LowerBound Case

### TableD.32.1 25% Efficienc Level: Ener and Water Savin s from 2003 

### to 2010 to 2020 to 2030 0.50 2.17 4.14 0.28 1.15 2.17 0.19 0.91 1.79 0.01 0.05 0.11 0.01 0.04 0.08
Table D.32.2 25% Efficiency Level: Cost and Net Present Values Water Saving (trillion gals) 

### 1.01 4.78 9.32

1.·.**CumuI~~yefor·c1othes.W~lie~:~~~e9~9~·2003**

# to 2030. t ..·· 

### Discounted at 7%'to.veafl99!V(iribilli0lfl997dollars) .· Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio 

### * includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer

!:! .!! 

### cs Q r-- Cl\ O'I 

# - =**~** 

### iS 2000 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 -0.5 -1.0 -1.5 ,, . I <Bost and Sa,·ing of Clothes Washers j I : 2005 2010 201.5 2020 2025 c::::J Price Change 111111 Energy &Water Saving

-- Net Saving



## ... ... 

# . .... ...

.... 

## ... "" .,

.... ... 

## ... 

# \ y**~**.... ...**~** 

### 15.00 6.80 8.19 2.2

2030



### Figure D.32 25% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards Sensitivity Scenario: 

### 45 LowerBound Case

### Tatble D.33.1 35% Efficiency Level: Enemv and Water Savin2s from 2003 

### to 2010 

### to 2020 

### to 2030 0.62 2.92 5.88 0.40 1.77 3.50

Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost NetPresent Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio 

### 0.20 1.05 2.15

•includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer 

### 0.01 0.06 0.13 0.01 0.05 0.10

Cost and Sa,·ing of Clothes \Yashers

E! .!! 'Ci**~l** t-• c, C\ 

### .... c:**~!** iii 2000 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 -1.0 -2.0 2005 2010 c:::::iPrice Change 1!1!11J Energy &Water Saving
-· - Net Sa\Ang

I-' :,; 

### "" '" 

# \!**~ ~** **~ ~**  i 

# I i 

# II**~** ' I**J~** :. l 

### ! :..,. 

### i**~** ' 

# .**~** :,; ' 

### ' i I• \ ·, r " 

### '**~!** 

## - I 2015 2020 2025**~** 

### "" lo" ; lo" ; 

# I I 

# I ! i ' ! 

### ' i 

### (trillion gals) 

### 1.18 6.18 12.72

20.39 11.32 9.07

1.8



### ' 2030

' " '**~;** 

### Figure D.33 35% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards Sensitivity Scenario: 

### 46 LowerBound Case

### T bl D 34 1 40CX Effi . a e 

# . . 0 

### 1c1ency 

### L IE eve: ner!!V andW ater

# s . avm!!S

.· .. ·; 

### Energy·Saving in 

### QlJa<ls ,<:'··::,· ;):-· 

### Water**·-.~··,.** :·.--. 

### ?:Total .. Blee · .· 

# Gas ' Oil' . LPcG Saving from 2003 (trillion gals) to 2010 0.62 0.40 0.20 0.01 0.01 1.18 to 2020 2.95 1.78 1.05 0.06 0.05 6.18 to 2030 5.92 3.53 2.16 0.13 0.10 12.72


### Table D.34.2 40% Efficiency Level: Cost and Net Present Values 

## ·**CtimltJatj;y~**

## for**Cloth~s W~h~~2B;ut9pased**  

### frq1ll2003, 

### to;.f-OpO··



## .. ···· ·,**D1sc~forited.at'7%**

## fo'vetit11:99o/."lnt(billi0n·1997 dollars)"{'..

Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio * includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer

2000 5.0 4.0 3.0 

### c .! Q 2.0 QrC\ C\ 

# - 1.0 c: 

## :5 i:i5 0.0 -1.0 -2.0 • I ' 

### €ostand Sa,·ing of €lo thcs \Vashers ' 2005 2010 c:::JPrice Change _.Energy &Water Saving --Net**Sa~ng** I , 2015 2020 2025

'



# - 20.48 11.37



### 9.11

1.8 ..

2030



### Figure D.34 40% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards Sensitivity Scenario: 

### 47 Lower Bound CaseT 

### bl D 35 1 45°1< 

### Effi . a e 

# . . 0 

### 1c1ency 

### L l E eve: ner!!V andW ater

# s . avm2s Energy'.$avirig 

### in Quads ., Water

# <t~b Total Elec Gas 

### Oil Saving 

### from 2003 (trillion gals) to 2010 0.66 0.45 0.19 0.01 0.01 0.87 to 2020 3.29 2.12 1.06 0.06 0.05 4.84 to 2030 6.89 4.39 2.26 0.13 0.10 10.28


### Table D.35.2 45% 

### Efficiency Level: Cost and Net Present Values**Cumlila~ve.for** 

### Clo!hes**\Vashets~l?ufoha8ed** fiom?2001tO2030 . DiseC>iliited at

### 7%to~~ar19Q;7diD.billioril§~7 dollars) :} ..·.· Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio 20.17 15.08

5.09

1.3 

### * includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer

i: .!! 

### c**~** r- 

### °' °' 

# - = 5 

# = 2000 5.0 - 4.0 3.0 - 2.0 1.0 0.0 -1.0 -2.0 -3.0 , \ , l I @ost and SaYing ofClothes Washers ' ' 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 c:=JPrice Change 1B11Energy & Water Saving

-- Net Saving "" 

### "" !,.-

... !,.-

... ""' 

# \; "" I-' L ,... p i.- I-' I• I• I•**~** 2030

•·



### Figure D.35 45% 

### Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards Sensitivity Scenario: 48 

### Lower Bound Case

### Table D.36.1 50% Efficien Level: Ener from 2003 to 2010 to 2020 to 2030 0.69 3.45 7.28 0.47 2.26 4.72 0.19 1.08 2.33 0.01 0.06 0.13 0.01 0.05 0.10 

### (trillion gals) 0.86 4.80 10.23


### Table D.36.2 50% Efficien Level: Cost and Net Present Values

Total Energy andWater Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/CostRatio •includessavings through the entire lifetime of the washer

5.0 4.0 3.0**~** .!! 2.0 c;**~** 

### '""' 1.0 Cl'\ Cl'\ 

### .... 1:1 

### .s**~** 0.0 -1.0 -2.0 -3.0 2000



### - Cost and Saving ofClothes Washc.•rs 2005 2010 c:::::J Price Change l!!!!!l!!!I Energy & Water Saving --Net Sa.,,;ng 2015 2020 202520.85 15.57

5.28

1.3

2030



### Figure D.36 50% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards Sensitivity Scenario: 49 

### LowerBound Case

### Ta.hie D.37.1 

### So/o Efficiency Level: Enert!V and Water Savin!!S from 2003 to 

### 2010 to 

### 2020 to 

### 2030 0.04 0.16 0.32 0.03 0.10 0.20

Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio 

### 0.01 0.05 0.11

• includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer 

### 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00

Cost and Sa,·ing ofCloth.cs \Vashers 2000 0.5 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 c:::J Price Change 0.4 IBilllEnergy & Water Saving --Net Sa\Ang 

### "" ... 

### ""
.... 

# .. r! 0.3 

# .. ... .! c; 

# = "" 

## "" ,,,. r-- 0.2 

### °" °" 

# - ,,,. 

### "" "" c: 

## ""**~** 0.1 

# = 0.0 

### ... 

### "" ..

## ~ ... . ·"

-0.1 

### (trillion gals) 

### 0.05 0.24 0.47

1.74 

### 0.00 1.74 

### 416

2030 

### "" "" 

### "" ""

Fig.ure D.37 5% Efficiency Level: Annual**~ost** 

### and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards Sensitivity Scenario: 

### 50 Upper Bound Case

### Table D.38.1 10% Efficiency Level: Enerl?V and Water Savinl!S 

### from200J to 2010 to 2020 to 

### 2030 .0.13 0.55 1.06 0.08 0.32 0.61

· -**Cumull3'.tio/~~1for,;~lpij("'··** 

# _·:**;_nis26-dfi~&a.iffi%!** Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio 

### 0.04 0.21 0.41

•includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer 

### 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.02

Cost and Saving ofClothes 'Vash(•rs

r: .! Ci Q r-- 

### "' 

## "' 

# - i:=**~** l:C 2000 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 

### - 0.2 

## - 0.1 0.0 -0.1 ·- 2005 2010 c::::J Price Change 11!1!!!!1 Energy & Water Saving --Net Sa"1ng

/ /

... / 

# ,,

...

# ~ 2015 2020 2025**~ ~**  .... ....

.... .... 

# -**~** 

### ""
... /

... 

### (trillion gals) 0.05 0.24 0.47

3.38 0.06 3.32

55

.... .... 2030

....



### Figure D.38 10% Efficiency Level: 

### Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards 

### Sensitivity Scenario: 51 

### Upper Bound Case

### T bl D 39 1 15o/c Effi . a e 

# . . 0 

### 1c1ency 

### L IE eve: ner2V andW t 

### S . a er, avmgs

I

# T~~l .Energy Saving in Quads ' 

### : . • 

### Water Elec ·• Gas 

### Oil. LPG Saving from 2003 (trillion gals) 

### to 2010 0.24 0.14 0.09 0.01 0.00 0.05 to 2020 1.03 0.56 0.42 0.03 0.02 0.24 to 2030 1.98 1.06 0.82 0.05 0.04 0.46
Table D.39.2 15% Efficiency Level: Cost and Net Present Values 

### CumulativeforClothes Wasliersllritchased**fToffi,~003Jo'2030**

.. , ,< .•·.··· ..

### JDisc:giuitect'.~t.i1%to~ear.1997<hibillionH99:o/aolliir~) ....·

## .> .... Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio 

### * includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer

f .!! 

### c i::irCl\ Cl\ 

# - =**~** i:6 2000 1.2 1.0 - 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 -0.2 . . ·•· I 

### Cost and Saving 

### ofClothes :\\rashers 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 c:::JPrice Change -Energy &Water Saving ,... --Net Sa\.ing 

## ... ,... 

# - ,... 

# - ... 

# - v ,,, v ,,, :.-- ,,, ,,,


## ... ,,, 

### ,.. 

# di uuu 

### 5.31 0.41 4.91

13



# - ,... 2030



### Figure D.39 15% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards Sensitivity Scenario: 

### 52 Upper Bound Case

### Ta.hie 

### D.40.1 20% Efficienc Level: Ene and Water Savin s · from 2003 1to 

### 2010 ito 

### 2020 ltO 

### 2030 0.29 1.25 

### 2.42 0.17 0.67 

### 1.26

Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost NetPresent Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio 0.11 

### 0.53 

### 1.04

*includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer 

### 0.01 0.03 

### 0.06 0.01 0.03 0.05

Cost**~rnd** Sa,·ing of Clothes Washers

r! .!! 

### c Q 

### .,.. 

### °'**~** c:**~** 

# = 2000 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 -0.2 -0.4 2005 2010

,,,.. ,,•Price Change li!!!!!B Energy &Water Saving --Net Saving 

## "" :,,. 

### "' :,,. 

## "' I" 

### "' mDI 

## ... :,,. 

## [t1J i ' 

### l 

## ! 1 i**~** 1 

## .. .. 201.5 2020 2025



# - ... ... ....


## ... :,,. 

### "' 

# "'

'

i i ! j 

# . ' 

### , ' \**~** ' l i ' ! i 

## .. .. ' 

### ' ' 

### 6.53

1.34 5.19 

### 4.9



## ...

! )**~**



## .. 2030



# - ....



## ..**Fii~ure** 

### D.40 20% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards Sensitivity Scenario: 53 

### Upper Bound Case

### Table D.41.1 25% Efficiency Level: Enerav and Water Savine:s from 2003 

### to 2010 to 

### 2020 to 

### 2030 0.54 2.36 4.59 

### 0.31 1.26 

### 2.40 

### 0.21 1.00 1.98 

### 0.01 0.06 0.12 

### 0.01 0.05 0.09 

### (trillion gals) 1.10 5.21 10.34


### Tahle D.41.2 25% Efficiency Level: Cost and Net Present Values

Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio
• includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer 

### 32.13 5.97

. 26.16 

### 5.4

Cost and Saving of Clothes Washers

f**~** 0**~** r-- 

### °' °' .... c EE l:Q 2000 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 -2.0 2005 2010 1.e,.!Price Change llili!IEnergy & Water Saving

-- Net Saving



# .. ... ...


## ... 

## ...

... m

# m.J.. ... 

## ... "'1H1 L:I L:I I ' 

## .. 1 2020 2025



### ... .... ... .... 

# .. ... ... ... 

## ... .... 

## ... ... 

## ... ....

j**~** 

# ' \ ' 1·**~** 

## .. 

## .. 2030

lo'

l



## .. FigureD.41 25% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards Sensitivity Scenario: 54 Upper Bound Case .

### Ta.hie D.42.1 

### from 2003 to 

### 2010 to 

### 2020 to 

### 2030 35% Efficiency Level: Ene11?Y and Water**Savin~s**


### 0.78 3.44 6.79 0.50 2.08 4.04 0.25 1.23 2.48 0.02 0.07 0.15 0.01 0.06 0.12 

### (trillion gals) 1.48 7.26 14.66
Table D.42.2 35o/o Efficienc Level: Cost and Net PresentValues
Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio •includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer . Cost and Saving of Clothes \Yashcrs 2000 16.0 14.0 12.0 I: 10.0 Ill =E 8.0**~** 

# ...**~** 6.0 

# ... 

# .e 4.o**~** 2.0 0.0 -2.0 -4.0 2005 2010 

## c:aPrice Change liil!i!I Energy & Water Saving

-- Net Saving

.... 

## "' "'

.. m 1 

# IJ. ... .... 

### ...**~IJ** 

### l.J I i I } 2015 2020 2025


# "' ,.



### ... .... .... 

### ... 

# "' "' ,.

....
.... I ' 

### ' 

### '**~** ! 1 i I ; • ' i i 

### 46.17 12.22 33.95



### 3.8

....

,.
....

' ' 2030 

## "'

FigureD.42 35% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards 

### SensitivityScenario: 

### 55 Upper Bound Case----------



### Table D.43.1 40% Efficiency Level: Enen!V and Water Savings



### from 2003 to 2010 to 2020 to 2030 0.78 

### 3.47 6.83 0.50 

### 2.10 4.08

Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost NetPresent Benefit Benefit/CostRatio 

### 0.25 1.23 2.49

• includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer 

### 0.02 0.07 0.15 0.01 

### 0.06 0.12

Cost and Saving of Clothes Washers

I: 

### s 0 t::irCl\ Cl\ 

# - c:I 

## :S ii5 2000 16.0 14.0 12.0 10.0

8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 

### o.o -2.0 -4.0 2005 2010 c::::!I Price Change li!!l!!I Energy &Water Saving

-- Net Saving



## ... ... 

## ... ....



## ... ramll 

# .. .... 

## 'M-f:H1U ' ' 

## l !


## .. 2015 2020 2025

.... ... ,,. .... 

# .. ...

.... ....

...
.... ...**~** ! ' 

### ' j ' ' I ;**~ ~**  

## ..**~** 

### (trillion gals) 1.48 

### 7.26 14.66

46.28 12.26 34.01



### 3.8

2030

,,. ,,.

.... ....

; 

### Fig.ure 

### D.43 40% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards 

### Sensitivity Scenario: 56 

### Upper Bound Case

### Ta1ble D.44.1 from 2003 1to 

### 2010 1to 

### 2020 1to 

### 2030 45% Efficiency Level: Ener!!V and Water**Savin~s**


### 0.86 3.95 7.94 0.59 2.54 5.04 0.25 1.27 2.63 0.01 0.07 0.15 0.01 0.06 0.12 (trillion gals) 1.18 5.97 12.27
Table D.44.2 45°./o Efficiency Level: Cost and Net Present Values

Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/Cost Ratio •includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer Cost and SaYing of Clothes Washers

I: ..!!! Q**~** 

### " 

### °' °' .... 

### = 

## :3 

# = 2000 14.0 12.0 10.0

8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 -2.0 -4.0 2005 2010 C9Price Change -Energy &Water Saving -Net Saving



## ... 

# .. 

# -·· ... 

# .. ...

# ~ 'l--1. 

# . '**~** :**~** i j I**~** 1 ,, . 2015 2020 2025

lo" lo" 

# .. ... lo" 

# .. ... 

# .. "'

.... 

## "'

....
1: 

### I '**~ ~**  i 

### ' ; ! 

### ! 

## .. 43.33 16.99 26.33

2.5



# ..

... 

# ..

I· 2030



## ...**Fi~:ure** 

### D.44 45% Efficiency Level: Annual Cost and Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards Sensitivity Scenario: 57 Upper Bound Case

### Ta.hie D.45.1 50% Efficiency Level: Enere:v and Water Savine;s from 2003· 

### to 2010 

### to 2020 

### to 2030 0.91 4.15 8.37 0.62 2.71 5.40

Total Energy and Water Saving* Total Equipment Cost Net Present Benefit Benefit/CostRatio 0.26 1.31 2.70

•includes savings through the entire lifetime of the washer 0.01 0.07 0.15 0.01 0.06 0.12

Cost and SaYing of Clothes Washers

r! .!! Q .:= r- 

### °' °' 

# - Cl 

## 5 

# = 2000 14.0 12.0 10.0

8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 -2.0 -4.0 2005 2010 CE51Price Change ll!mEnergy &Water Saving

-- Net Saving



## "" ,; I-"
....

- Ill**~** 

### ... 

# u .... ' i ; 

## , ! . 2020 2025



### ... 

# .. "'


# .. i.- ...



### ... .... 

# .. I"' ,; ,; ' 

### ' ; ' ' i ; ' ' ; i \ 

### ! ; \ ' 

### (trillion gals) 1.17 5.95 12.25

44.25 17.60 26.65

2.5

2030

.... .... .... 

## "'

' 

### Fig;ure D.45 50% Efficiency Level: Annual Costand Saving ofClothes Washers due to Standards Sensitivity Scenario: 58 

### Upper Bound Case