alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

★(Star Print)

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 49

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require

two-thirds majorities for bills increasing taxes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 27 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 23), 1996

Mr. KYL (for himself, Mr. COVERDELL, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. FAIRCLOTH, Mr.

GRAMS, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. KEMPTHORNE, Mr. LOTT, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr.

PRESSLER, Mr. SANTORUM, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. SMITH, Mr. THOMAS, and

Mr. THOMPSON) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read

twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to require two-thirds majorities for bills increasing

taxes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several
2

•SJ 49 IS

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission

2 by the Congress:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE—

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. Any bill to levy a new tax or increase

5 the rate or base of any tax may pass only by a two-thirds

6 majority of the whole number of each House of Congress.

7 ‘‘SECTION 2. The Congress may waive section 1 when

8 a declaration of war is in effect. The Congress may also

9 waive section 1 when the United States is engaged in mili10 tary conflict which causes an imminent and serious threat

11 to national security and is so declared by a joint resolu12 tion, adopted by a majority of the whole number of each

13 House, which becomes law. Any provision of law which

14 would, standing alone, be subject to section 1 but for this

15 section and which becomes law pursuant to such a waiver

16 shall be effective for not longer than 2 years.

17 ‘‘SECTION 3. All votes taken by the House of Rep18 resentatives or the Senate under this article shall be deter19 mined by yeas and nays and the names of persons voting

20 for and against shall be entered on the Journal of each

21 House respectively.’’.

Æ
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 670 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to extend the Medicaid 

rules regarding supplemental needs trusts for Medicaid beneficiaries to 

trusts established by those beneficiaries, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2015 

Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania (for himself and Mr. PALLONE) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to extend 

the Medicaid rules regarding supplemental needs trusts 

for Medicaid beneficiaries to trusts established by those 

beneficiaries, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Special Needs Trust 

5 Fairness Act of 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 670 IH

1 SEC. 2. FAIRNESS IN MEDICAID SUPPLEMENTAL NEEDS 

2 TRUSTS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1917(d)(4)(A) of the So4 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396p(d)(4)(A)) is amended 

5 by inserting ‘‘the individual,’’ after ‘‘for the benefit of such 

6 individual by’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) shall apply to trusts established on or after 

9 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 209

To provide for the approval of interim regulations applicable to the Senate

and the employees of the Senate and adopted by the Board of the

Office of Compliance before January 23, 1996, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 22, 1996

Mr. DOLE submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

To provide for the approval of interim regulations applicable

to the Senate and the employees of the Senate and

adopted by the Board of the Office of Compliance before

January 23, 1996, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. APPROVAL OF INTERIM REGULATIONS.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The interim regulations applicable

4 to the Senate and the employees of the Senate that were

5 adopted by the Board of the Office of Compliance before

6 January 23, 1996, are hereby approved until such time

7 as final regulations applicable to the Senate and the em8 ployees of the Senate are approved in accordance with sec-
2

•SRES 209 ATS

1 tion 304(c) of the Congressional Accountability Act of

2 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1384(c)).

3 (b) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in subsection (a) shall

4 be construed to affect the authority of the Senate under

5 such section 304(c).

Æ
Exhibit 12
                                                    to Form 10-Q
                                                    For the Quarter
                                                    Ended June 30, 1997

                             Lucent Technologies Inc.
                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

                              (Dollars in Millions)
                                   (Unaudited)

                                                           For the Nine
                                                           Months Ended
                                                           June 30, 1997

Earnings Before Income Taxes...........................       $ 1,850

Less Interest Capitalized during
  the Period...........................................            10

Less Undistributed Earnings of Less than 50%
  Owned Affiliates.....................................             2

Add Fixed Charges......................................           349

Total Earnings ........................................       $ 2,187



Fixed Charges

Total Interest Expense Including Capitalized Interest..         $ 266

Interest Portion of Rental Expense.....................            83

    Total Fixed Charges................................         $ 349

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.....................           6.3
Exhibit 8.1

LIST OF SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES

The following is a list of Teekay
Offshore Partners L.P.s significant subsidiaries as at December 31, 2011:



|                                            |  |                                       |  |                                 |        |  
|------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------- | ------ | -
|Name of Significant Subsidiary              |  | State orJurisdiction of
Incorporation |  | Proportion 
ofOwnershipInterest |       
|TEEKAY AUSTRALIA OFFSHORE HOLDINGS PTY LTD. |  | AUSTRALIA                             |  |                                 | 100.00 | %
|NAVION BERGEN L.L.C.                        |  | MARSHALL ISLANDS                      |  |                                 | 100.00 | %
|VARG L.L.C.                                 |  | MARSHALL ISLANDS                      |  |                                 | 100.00 | %
|TPO SIRI L.L.C.                             |  | MARSHALL ISLANDS                      |  |                                 | 100.00 | %
|PIRANEMA PRODUCTION AS                      |  | MARSHALL ISLANDS                      |  |                                 | 100.00 | %
|PIRANEMA L.L.C.                             |  | MARSHALL ISLANDS                      |  |                                 | 100.00 | %
|NAVION GOTHENBURG L.L.C.                    |  | MARSHALL ISLANDS                      |  |                                 | 50.00  | %
|NAVION OFFSHORE LOADING AS.                 |  | NORWAY                                |  |                                 | 100.00 | %
|NORSK TEEKAY AS.                            |  | NORWAY                                |  |                                 | 100.00 | %
|NORSK TEEKAY HOLDINGS LTD.                  |  | MARSHALL ISLANDS                      |  |                                 | 100.00 | %
|TEEKAY EUROPEAN HOLDINGS S.A.R.L.           |  | LUXEMBOURG                            |  |                                 | 100.00 | %
|TEEKAY NAVION OFFSHORE LOADING PTE. LTD.    |  | SINGAPORE                             |  |                                 | 100.00 | %
|TEEKAY NETHERLANDS EUROPEAN HOLDINGS BV.    |  | NETHERLANDS                           |  |                                 | 100.00 | %
|TEEKAY NORDIC HOLDINGS INC.                 |  | MARSHALL ISLANDS                      |  |                                 | 100.00 | %
|TEEKAY NORWAY AS.                           |  | NORWAY                                |  |                                 | 100.00 | %
|TEEKAY OFFSHORE OPERATING L.P.              |  | MARSHALL ISLANDS                      |  |                                 | 100.00 | %
|UGLAND NORDIC SHIPPING AS.                  |  | NORWAY                                |  |                                 | 100.00 | %
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

M EMORANDUM O RDER

Appellate case name: Azhar M. Chaudhary v. Victoria A. Mora and Kristie R. Salter

Appellate case number: 01

- 21

- 00352

- CV

Trial court case number: 18

- DCV

- 254442

Trial court: 434th District Court of Fort Bend County

The motion for en banc reconsideration is denied

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Peter Kelly

 Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack, and Justices Kelly, Goodman, Hightower, Countiss,

Rivas

- Molloy, Guerra , and Farris

.

Justice Landau, not participating.

Date: December 13, 2022
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 106 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 106

To authorize testimony by former Senate employee and representation by 
                          Senate Legal Counsel

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                April 6 (legislative day, April 5), 1995

    Mr. Dole (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To authorize testimony by former Senate employee and representation by 
                          Senate Legal Counsel

Whereas, in the case of Pittston Coal Group, Inc. v. I.U., UMWA, Case No. 93-
        0162-A, pending in the United States District Court for the Western 
        District of Virginia, a subpoena for testimony at a deposition has been 
        issued to Marisa Spatafore, a former employee of the Senate on the staff 
        of Senator Rockefeller;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial process, be taken from 
        such control or possession but by permission of the Senate;
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistently with 
        the privileges of the Senate;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978 (2 U.S.C. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(2) (1988)), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to represent committees, Members, officers and 
        employees of the Senate with respect to subpoenas or orders issued to 
        them in their official capacity: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Marisa Spatafore is authorized to testify in the 
case of Pittston Coal Group, Inc. v. I.U., UMWA, except concerning 
matters for which a privilege should be asserted.
    Sec. 2. That the Senate Legal Counsel is directed to represent 
Senator Rockefeller, Marisa Spatafore, and any other Member or employee 
of the Senate from whom testimony or documents may be sought in 
connection with this case.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS INCLUDED IN THE
COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,251
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,476
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,111
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,837
<PP&E>                                           1,872
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,509
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,554
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,836
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,509
<SALES>                                          9,377
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,377
<CGS>                                            4,708
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,708
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,909
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  10
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    773
<INCOME-TAX>                                       131
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                642
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       642
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

18 U.S.C. Section 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of 1st Pacific Bancorp (the "Company") for the period ended
December 31, 2007 (this "Report"), A. Vincent Siciliano, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and James H. Burgess, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|Date: March 28, 2008 |  |     |                                                                                         
|-------------------- |  | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | By: | /s/A. VINCENT SICILIANOA. Vincent Siciliano President and Chief Executive Officer       
|                     |  | By: | /s/JAMES H. BURGESSJames H. Burgess Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---



QuickLinks
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adan HERNANDEZ-NUNEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-40118 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 5, 2017

Jeffrey Scott Miller, Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Corpus Christi, TX, Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, John Moreno Parras, Kathryn She-phard, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Adan Hernandez-Nunez pleaded guilty of harboring an alien for financial gain, and he received an above-guidelines sentence of fifty months in prison and three years’ supervised release. He contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because the district court’s decision that an above-guidelines sentence was warranted was grounded in conduct that was already factored into the guidelines calculations.

If the district court has imposed a sentence that deviates from the guidelines range, this court evaluates whether the sentence “unreasonably fails to reflect the statutory sentencing factors” set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). *United States v. Smith,*440 F.3d 704, 708 (5th Cir. 2006). “A non-Guideline sentence unreasonably fails to reflect the statutory sentencing factors where it (1) does not account for a factor that should have received significant weight, (2) gives significant weight to an irrelevant or improper factor, or (3) represents a clear error of judgment in balancing the sentencing factors.” *Id.*

The district court gave due consideration to the § 3553(a) factors and committed no error when balancing them. *See id.*Hernandez-Nunez’s theory that the court should have balanced the § 3553(a) factors differently “is not a sufficient ground for reversal.” *See United States v. Malone,*828 F.3d 331, 342 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*- U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 526, 196 L.Ed.2d 408 (2016).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 11 July 2006         

amending Appendix B to Annex IX to the 2003 Act of Accession as regards certain establishments in the meat sector in Lithuania

(notified under document number C(2006) 3115)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/480/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to the Act of Accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia, and in particular Annex IX, Chapter 5, Section B, Subsection I, paragraph (d) thereto,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Appendix B to Annex IX to the 2003 Act of Accession is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 July 2006.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ C 227 E, 23.9.2003, p. 438.

(2)OJ L 160, 30.4.2004, p. 62. Corrected by OJ L 212, 12.6.2004, p. 34.

(3)OJ L 160, 30.4.2004, p. 67. Corrected by OJ L 212, 12.6.2004, p. 39.

(4)OJ L 143, 7.6.2005, p. 38.

(5)OJ L 241, 17.9.2005, p. 64.

----

ANNEX

                     ‘Appendix B

referred to in Chapter 5, Section B, Subsection I to Annex IX (1)

List of establishments, including shortcomings and deadlines for the correction of these shortcomings

MEAT ESTABLISHMENTS

Initial list

FISH ESTABLISHMENTS

Initial list

MILK ESTABLISHMENTS

Initial list

----

(1)  For the text of Annex IX see OJ L 236, 23.9.2003, p. 836.

----
Exhibit 12
                                                    Form 10-Q
                                                    For the Three
                                                    Months Ended
                                                    December 31, 1997



                             Lucent Technologies Inc.
                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

                              (Dollars in Millions)
                                   (Unaudited)


                                                                 For the Three
                                                                 Months Ended
                                                               December 31, 1997
                                                             
Earnings Before Income Taxes ................................       $ 1,478
                                                             
Less Interest Capitalized during                             
  the Period ................................................             4
                                                             
Less Undistributed Earnings of Less than 50%                 
  Owned Affiliates ..........................................             3
                                                             
Add Fixed Charges ...........................................           122
                                                             
Total Earnings ..............................................       $ 1,593
                                                             
                                                             
                                                             
Fixed Charges                                                
                                                             
Total Interest Expense Including Capitalized Interest .......         $  93
                                                             
Interest Portion of Rental Expense ..........................            29
                                                             
    Total Fixed Charges .....................................         $ 122
                                                             
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges ..........................          13.1
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Sabine Pass LNG, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Meg A. Gentle, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:





|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|    |                                                                                                                                                    
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







Date: March 1, 2013





/s/ MEG A. GENTLEMeg A. GentleChief Financial Officer ofSabine Pass LNG-GP, LLC, the general partner ofSabine Pass LNG, L.P.