alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 147 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 147

 Designating the weeks beginning September 24, 1995, and September 22, 
   1996, as ``National Historically Black Colleges and Universities 
                    Week'', and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 30 (legislative day, June 19), 1995

Mr. Thurmond submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating the weeks beginning September 24, 1995, and September 22, 
   1996, as ``National Historically Black Colleges and Universities 
                    Week'', and for other purposes.
Whereas there are 103 historically black colleges and universities in the United 
        States;
Whereas black colleges and universities provide the quality education so 
        essential to full participation in a complex, highly technological 
        society;
Whereas black colleges and universities have a rich heritage and have played a 
        prominent role in American history;
Whereas black colleges and universities have allowed many underprivileged 
        students to attain their full potential through higher education; and
Whereas the achievements and goals of historically black colleges and 
        universities are deserving of national recognition: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the Senate designates the weeks beginning September 
24, 1995, and September 22, 1996, as ``National Historically Black 
Colleges and Universities Week''. The Senate requests the President of 
the United States to issue a proclamation calling on the people of the 
United States and interested groups to observe the weeks with 
appropriate ceremonies, activities, and programs to demonstrate support 
for historically black colleges and universities in the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-77-2021]

On November 10, 2021, Lam Research Corporation submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facilities within Subzone 18F, in Fremont, Hayward, Livermore, Newark, and Tracy, California.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (86 FR 66522, November 23, 2021). On March 10, 2022, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including Section 400.14.                

Dated: March 10, 2022.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-05407 Filed 3-14-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Antony, 136 Ohio St.3d 1223, 2013-Ohio-2625.] 

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. ANTONY. 

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Antony, 136 Ohio St.3d 1223, 

2013-Ohio-2625.] 

(No. 2012-1181—Submitted June 18, 2013—Decided June 25, 2013.) 

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 

____________________ 

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 

application for reinstatement on February 20, 2013, by respondent, John Peter 

Antony, Attorney Registration No. 0043520, last known business address in 

Highland Heights, Kentucky. 

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of September 6, 2012, 

wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F)(4), suspended respondent for 

a period of 90 days and ordered that he will not be reinstated to the practice of law 

in Ohio until he is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Florida, finds 

that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions 

of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). 

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to 

the practice of law in the state of Ohio. It is further ordered that respondent’s 

second application for reinstatement filed April 15, 2013, is moot. 

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies 

of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made 

as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of 

publication. 

O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY,

FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. 

________________________
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consentto the incorporation by reference (i) in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-140576) pertaining to the 2007 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan of Fortress Investment Group LLC and (ii) in the Registration Statement (Form S-3No. 333-153689) and in the related Prospectus of Fortress Investment Group LLC for the registration of Class A Shares, Preferred Shares, Depositary Shares, Warrants, Subscription Rights, Purchase Contracts and Purchase Units of our reportsdated March 1, 2010, with respect to the consolidated and combined financial statements of Fortress Investment Group LLC and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Fortress Investment Group LLC, included in this AnnualReport (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

New York, New York 

March 1, 2010
J ' 

SERVED: February 12, 2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

RIDAN INVESTMENTS. INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO.!TO BE ASSIUNEDJ 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. l''AA 2013 - I 082 

CORRECTED AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER 

In response to the Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "FAA"), Motion 

for Continuance dated December 9, 2014, Paragraphs #2 and #3 of the Amended 

Procedural Order are amended as follows: 

Unless specifically changed herein all prior orders remain in etTect. We do not 

anticipate scheduling this case prior to June 1, 2015. 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the 

following procedural schedule: 

I. On or before June L 2015, the parties shall conclude all discovery including. hut 

not limited to, depositions, document production. responses to production 

requests and/or interrogatories. lfthe parties cannot resolve a discovery dispute 

they shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for resolution in a timely manner: 

2. The parties shall be prepared to present this case at a hearing on or after June 1. · 

2015, subject to the availability of courtroom facilities. The specific date and 

time'for the hearing will be forthcoming in a separate Order. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment- Service List 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W I 000 1 

President 

Ridan Investments, Re.\j)(mdenl 

18540 Minthorn Street 

Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 

TEL: NOT PROVIDED 

FAX: NOT PROVIDED 

Lawrence M. Burek, Respondent's Counsel 

550 North Parkcenter Drive, Suite 204 

Santa Ana, CA 92705 

TEL: 7 I 4-564-9033 

FAX: NOT PROVIDED 

Tammy Leach 

P.O. Box 891324 

Temecula, CA 92589 

TEL: 95 I -970-6762 

FAX: NOT PROVIDED 

Courtney Adolph, Complainant's ( 'mmsel 

ONE COPY 

Office of the Regional Counsel, Western-Pacific Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 3 I 0-725-7 I 28 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings. M-20 

U.S. Depmiment of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (EI 1-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FOMS No. F/\/\-:20 13- t 082 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building---Suite 2WIOOO, Washington. 

DC 2059 I: Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
| 1. | I      have reviewed this annual report on Form 10–K/A of Duncan Energy Partners      L.P.; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this      report. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|     Date:      June 11, 2009 |   |   |              /s/ Richard H. Bachmann                              |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                             |   | Name:  | Richard      H. Bachmann                                                                                  |   |
|                                             |   | Title: | Chief      Executive Officer of DEP Holdings, LLC,the      General Partner of Duncan Energy Partners L.P. |   |
|                                             |   |   |                                                                                                      |   |

----
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 54 (Monday, March 21, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 16008]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05835]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, Topics in Alzheimer's 
Disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment and Cognitive Aging, March 25, 2022, 
10:00 a.m. to March 25, 2022, 8:00 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 
Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was 
published in the Federal Register on March 03, 2022, FR Doc. 2022-
04426, 87 FR 12182.
    This meeting is being amended to change the Contact Person from 
Maribeth Champoux to Heidi Friedman, Ph.D., Center for Scientific 
Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, 
MD, 301-379-5623. The meeting is closed to the public.

    March 15, 2022.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-05835 Filed 3-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 135

To authorize production of documents, testimony by a former Senate

employee, and representation by Senate Legal Counsel.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 15 (legislative day, JUNE 5), 1995

Mr. DOLE (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize production of documents, testimony by a former

Senate employee, and representation by Senate Legal

Counsel.

Whereas the plaintiffs in Schneider v. Schaaf, Civ. No. 95–

C–1056 and Schneider v. Messer, Civ. No. 93–C–124,

civil actions pending in State court in North Dakota have

sought the deposition testimony of Ross Keys, a former

Senate employee who worked for Senator Kent Conrad

and documents from Senator Conrad’s office;

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States

and rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be taken

from such control or possession but by permission of the

Senate;
2

SRES 135 ATS

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or

in the possession of the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take such action as will

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges

of the Senate; and

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a)

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent employees of the Senate with respect to requests

for testimony made to them in their official capacities:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That Ross Keys is authorized to produce

2 records and provide testimony in the cases of Schneider

3 v. Schaaf and Schneider v. Messer, except concerning mat4 ters for which a privilege should be asserted.

5 SEC. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to

6 represent Ross Keys in connection with the testimony au7 thorized by section 1 of this resolution.

Æ
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 149

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the recent announcement by

the Republic of France that it intends to conduct a series of underground

nuclear test explosions despite the current international moratorium on

nuclear testing.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 12 (legislative day, JULY 10), 1995

Mr. AKAKA submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Foreign Relations

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the recent

announcement by the Republic of France that it intends

to conduct a series of underground nuclear test explosions despite the current international moratorium on

nuclear testing.

Whereas the President of France stated on June 13, 1995,

that the Republic of France plans to conduct 8 nuclear

test explosions over the next several months;

Whereas the United States, France, Russia, and Great Britain have observed a moratorium on nuclear testing since

1992;

Whereas a resumption of testing by the Republic of France

could result in the disintegration of the current testing
2

•SRES 149 IS

moratorium and a renewal of underground testing by

other nuclear weapon states;

Whereas a resumption of nuclear testing raises serious environmental and health concerns;

Whereas the United Nations Conference on Disarmament

presently is meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, for the purpose of negotiating a Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban

Treaty (CTBT), which would halt permanently the practice of conducting nuclear test explosions; and

Whereas the announcement by the President of France severely undermines the efforts of the international community to conclude a CTBT by 1996, a goal endorsed by

175 nations, including France and the United States, at

the recently completed NPT Extension and Review Conference (the conference for the extension and review of

the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty): Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the

2 Republic of France should abide by the current inter3 national moratorium on nuclear test explosions, refrain

4 from proceeding with its announced intention of conduct5 ing a series of nuclear tests in advance of a Comprehensive

6 Test Ban Treaty, and initiate preparations to close its un7 derground test sites at the Moruroa and Fangataufa

8 atolls.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       4,776,608
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,009,312
<ALLOWANCES>                                    21,516
<INVENTORY>                                  1,097,283
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,447,079
<PP&E>                                       3,763,685
<DEPRECIATION>                                 890,574
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,856,363
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          620,775
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    11,898,150
<OTHER-SE>                                     665,790
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,856,363
<SALES>                                      2,592,434
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,592,434
<CGS>                                        2,948,498
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,948,498
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                92,971
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             979,956
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,491,367)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,491,367)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.57)
        



</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ricardo SANCHEZ-OLIVERA Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-50280 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed January 8, 2018

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Ricardo Sanchez-Olivera, Pro Se

Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Ricardo Sanchez-Olivera has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Sanchez-Olivera has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R, 47.5,4,
Note: This file was prepared prior to signature of the final NESHAP amendments for secondary

lead smelting, which were signed on December 16, 2011 and published in the Federal Register 

on January 5, 2012 (77 FR 556). However, the file was inadvertently not sent to the docket at 

that time.
MEMORANDUM:

To: Secondary Lead RTR Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0344

From: Nathan Topham, Project Lead

Date: December 16, 2011

Re: Potential Interface Between Enclosure Standards in section 63.544(c) and Standards for 

Containment Buildings

Some secondary lead smelters are classified as treatment, storage and disposal facilities under the 

regulations implementing subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). 

Some of these facilities have enclosures which may be “containment buildings”, which is a type 

of regulated unit under the subtitle C rules. See 40 CFR section 264.1100. These containment 

buildings must “take measures to control fugitive emissions such that any openings (doors, 

windows, vents, cracks, etc.) exhibit no visible emissions”. 40 CFR section 264.1101 (c)(4). 

EPA believes that this standard is compatible with the requirements for enclosures being 

promulgated in section 63.544. Specifically, EPA sees no technical impediment to a source 

using the same measures to satisfy the enclosure standards and the no visible emissions standard. 

Nor did any commenter suggest otherwise.
From: Steckel, Andrew

To: LEVIN, NANCY

Subject: FW: Requested Information

Date: Friday, June 26, 2015 7:01:31 AM

Attachments: AO engine Retrofit analysis.docx

Wood-burning1.docx

Evaluation of Covers Lagoons Manure Piles for NH3.docx

________________________________________

From: Sheraz Gill [Sheraz.Gill@valleyair.org]

Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 4:34 PM

To: Steckel, Andrew

Cc: Drake, Kerry; Kay, Rynda; Perez, Idalia; Law, Nicole; Mays, Rory; Errol Villegas; Anna Myers; Sylvia

Vanderspek (svanders@arb.ca.gov)

Subject: Requested Information

Hello Andy,

Attached is the information requested based on the latest discussions between EPA and the District. Please let me

know if you have any questions. Thanks

Sheraz Gill

Director of Strategies and Incentives

San Joaquin Valley APCD

Phone: (559) 230-5908

Fax: (559) 230-6061

sheraz.gill@valleyair.org<mailto:sheraz.gill@valleyair.org>

[cid:619554722@16102009-0291]
EX-35 (d)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


March 06, 2007

Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp.
11 Madison Ave
4th Floor
New York, ny 10010

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for Thornburg Mortgage Securities Trust
2006-6

Per Section 3.17 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 11/1/2006,
the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Securities Administrator),
hereby certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:


(A)  a review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year or
     portion thereof and of such party's performance under this Agreement, or
     such other applicable agreement in the case of any Servicing Function
     Participant, has been made under such officer's supervision and

(B)  to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such party
     has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, or such other
     applicable agreement in the case of any Servicing Function Participant, in
     all material respects throughout such year or portion thereof, or, if there
     has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect,
     specifying each such failure known to such officer and the nature and
     status thereof.



Certified By:
/s/ Barry Akers
Barry Akers
Vice President

Certified By:
/s/ Reid Denny
Reid Denny, Assistant Secretary