alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Christopher LANCASTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. TODD, Officer; Officer Artrip; B. Kunkle, Officer; Officer Ferell; M. Doyle, Lieutenant; Nurse Myers; Nurse Fowler; Nurse Hileman; Lieutenant Harrison; Warden Terry O’Brien; Associate Warden Odom; Executive Assistant Thompson; Nurse Dawson; Captain Gilly; D. Jones, Counselor; Sherk; C. Troopman, Position Officer; C. Bennet, Position Counselor; B. Michaels, Position Officer; Merkergo; Bradly, Position Officer; Allison, Position Officer; Andrews, Position Officer; Boyard, Position Officer; and all unknown not listed in complaint, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-7412

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 30, 2018

Decided: February 2, 2018

Christopher Lancaster, Appellant Pro Se. Erin K. Reisenweber, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Martins-burg, West Virginia, for Appellees.

. Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,' Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Lancaster appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to *Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,*403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Lancaster that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the *169consequences of noncompliance. *Wright v. Collins,*766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); *see also Thomas v. Arn,*474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). Lancaster has waived appellate review by failing to file objections in the district court after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
EXHIBIT 99.1


                 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

     The undersigned executive officer of First Federal Bancshares
of Arkansas, Inc. (the "Registrant") hereby certifies that the
Registrant's Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2003
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



                                   /s/Larry J. Brandt
                                   ---------------------------
                                   Larry J. Brandt
                                   President/Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 9, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 294 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 294

                     To provide for severance pay.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 17, 1996

 Mr. Stevens submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
                     To provide for severance pay.

    Resolved, (a) That the individual who was the Sergeant at Arms and 
Doorkeeper of the Senate on September 1, 1996, and whose service as the 
Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate terminated on or after 
September 1, 1996 but prior to September 6, 1996, shall be entitled to 
one lump sum payment consisting of severance pay in an amount equal to 
two months of the individual's basic pay at the rate such individual 
was paid on September 1, 1996.
    (b) The Secretary of the Senate shall make payments under this 
resolution from funds appropriated for fiscal year 1996 from the 
appropriation account ``Miscellaneous Items'' within the contingent 
fund of the Senate.
    (c) A payment under this resolution shall not be treated as 
compensation for purposes of any provision of title 5, United States 
Code, or of any other law relating to benefits accruing from employment 
by the United States, and the period of entitlement to such pay shall 
not be treated as a period of employment for purposes of any such 
provision of law.
                                 <all>
```
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: In re H.D., a Child

Appellate case number: 01

- 12

- 00007

- CV

Trial court case number: 1052475

Trial court: 310th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: May 24, 2013

Party filing motion: appellant, M.D.

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is DENIED GRANTED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Justices Keyes, Sharp, and Huddle

Date: October 1 , 2013
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF PATINA OIL & GAS CORPORATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § .1350



1.    I, Thomas J. Edelman, Chief Executive Officer of Patina Oil & Gas Corporation (the Company), hereby certify to the best of my knowledge that the accompanying report on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2003 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Report) by the Company fully complies with
the requirements of that section.



2.    I further certify
to the best of my knowledge that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/    THOMAS J. EDELMANName: Date:

Thomas J. Edelman August 1, 2003




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
document.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Patina Oil & Gas Corporation and will be retained by Patina Oil & Gas Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               279,198
<PP&E>                                       6,411,818
<DEPRECIATION>                                 414,669
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,738,361
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       25,022,291
<BONDS>                                      9,880,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,235,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       106,465
<OTHER-SE>                                (28,504,875)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,738,861
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,019,035
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,291,246)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,291,246)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (404,320)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,695,566)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.95)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.95)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
			AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
			OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

	In connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S.A. Sunrise
    Beverages, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
    September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
    Commission on November 14, 2002, (the "Report"), I, Barry I. Bennett,
    President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
    to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

	1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

	2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the Company's financial position and results
         of operations.


                                        /s/ Barry I. Bennett
					--------------------
					President and Chief Executive Officer
					November 14, 2002




                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
			AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
			OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

	In connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S.A. Sunrise
     Beverages, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
     September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
     Commission on November 14, 2002, (the "Report"), I, Todd D. Noble,
     Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
     U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
     Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

	1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

	2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the Company's financial position and results
         of operations.


                                        /s/ Todd D. Noble
					--------------------
					Chief Financial Officer
					November 14, 2002
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

JUL 17 1998

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

VIRGIL WAYNE BRADFORD, 

Petitioner - Appellant, No. 98-6095

v. (D.C. No. CIV-97-1499-L)

RON WARD, (W.D. Okla.)

Respondent - Appellee.

 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before ANDERSON, McKAY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

After examining Petitioner-Appellant’s brief and the appellate record, this

panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist

the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. 

The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Petitioner, appearing pro se, asks this court to grant him a certificate of

appealability, thereby allowing him to appeal the district court’s dismissal of his

28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. We may issue a certificate of appealability only when
-2-

the applicant makes a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). 

Petitioner’s Application for Certificate of Appealability asserts that the trial

court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because the evidence was

seized during a search which violated his constitutional rights. Petitioner had a

full and fair opportunity to litigate this claim in the state courts and is, therefore,

precluded from bringing a claim for habeas corpus relief based on this assertion. 

See Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465, 482 (1976); Miranda v. Cooper, 967 F.2d 392,

401 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 924 (1992). 

Petitioner also alleges that he is entitled to a certificate of appealability

because he was denied the right to effective assistance of counsel. Petitioner did

not assert this claim in his original petition for habeas corpus relief. Issues not

raised in the district court may not be considered by this court on appeal absent

extraordinary circumstances. See Smith v. Secretary of N.M. Dep’t of

Corrections, 50 F.3d 801, 814 n.22 (10th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Mondragon

v. Smith, 516 U.S. 905 (1995). Because this case does not involve extraordinary

circumstances justifying a departure from this rule, we do not address Petitioner’s

claim that he was denied effective assistance of counsel.

Because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right, his application for a certificate of appealability is DENIED,
-3-

and the district court’s denial of habeas relief is AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court

Monroe G. McKay

Circuit Judge
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of FFD Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Trent B. Troyer, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Trent B. Troyer
-------------------------------------
Trent B. Troyer
President and Chief Executive Officer
February 17, 2009
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 5, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00703

- CR

Marion Benavidez ROJAS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR11882 Honorable Joey Contreras, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Pursuant to a plea

- bargain agreement, Mario Rojas pled guilty to sexual assault of a child and was sentenced to twelve years in prison and a $1500.00 fine in a ccordance with the terms of

hi s plea

- bargain agreement. On August 28, 2018 , the trial court signed a certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2). After Rojas filed a notice of appeal, the trial

court cler k sent copies of the certification and notice of appeal to this court. See id. 25.2(e). The clerk’s record, which includes the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has been filed. See

id. 25.2(d).

“In a plea bargain case .

. . a defendant may app eal only: (A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal.” Id. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record, which contains a written plea bargain, establishes the punishm ent assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See id. The clerk’s record does not include a written motion filed and ruled upon before trial; nor does it indicate that the trial court gave its permission to appeal. See id. The trial court’s certification, therefore, appears to accurately

reflect that this is a plea

- bargain case and that Rojas does not have a right to appeal. We must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id. 25.2(d).

This appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d),

unless an amended trial cour t certification showing that Rojas has the right to ap peal is made partof the appellate record by November 5, 2018

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; Daniels v. State

, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, order).

We ORDER all appellate deadlines be suspended until further orde r of the court.

______________________ ___________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 5th day of October, 2018

.

_____________________ ______________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 99.1


                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

     The undersigned executive officer of First Federal Bancshares of
Arkansas, Inc. (the "Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form
10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



                                      /s/Larry J. Brandt
                                      ---------------------------------
                                      Larry J. Brandt
                                      President/Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 14, 2002
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4499-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Oregon (FEMA-4499-DR), dated March 28, 2020, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This change occurred on March 4, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Willie G. Nunn, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

This action terminates the appointment of Vincent J. Maykovich as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2022-05913 Filed 3-18-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P