alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-06-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-01-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             866
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,325
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      8,571
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,436
<PP&E>                                          26,347
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,257
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 157,705
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           92,209
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           142
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   157,705
<SALES>                                          2,863
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,156
<CGS>                                            1,986
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,512
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    42
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,250
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,649)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        40
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,689)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,689)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.55)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906 OF THE**
 **SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 I, Joseph L. Sullivan, President of CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 
 
 
 
 Date:  November 4 , 2004
 
 
 
 /s/ Joseph L. Sullivan
 Joseph L. Sullivan
 President
 (chief executive officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7164

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

JERMAINE JERRELL SIMS, a/k/a Justice, a/k/a Jus, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Claude M. Hilton, Senior 

District Judge. (3:98-cr-00045-CMH-1) 

Submitted: November 13, 2008 Decided: November 20, 2008 

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Jermaine Jerrell Sims, Appellant Pro Se. Nicholas Stephan 

Altimari, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, 

Virginia, Kenneth E. Melson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Jermaine Jerrell Sims seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his Motion for Independent 

Action for Relief from Judgment. The order is not appealable 

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating 

that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Sims has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate 

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1


                                                                 EXHIBIT 15.1




PowerCerv Corporation
400 North Ashley Drive, Suite 2700
Tampa, Florida  33602


Gentlemen:

Re:      Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-3960)


With respect to the above referenced registration statement, we acknowledge our
awareness of the incorporation by reference therein of our report dated April
17, 1997 related to our review of interim financial information, which report
was included in the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PowerCerv Corporation for
the three months ended March 31, 1997.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the
meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.





                                      /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                                      KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


Tampa, Florida
April 17, 1997
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 253 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

  2d Session
S. RES. 253

   Urging the detention and extradition to the United States by the 
appropriate foreign government of Mohammed Abbas for the murder of Leon 
                              Klinghoffer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 30, 1996

  Mr. D'Amato (for himself, Mr. Dole, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Nickles, Mr. 
Murkowski, and Mr. Hatch) submitted the following resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Urging the detention and extradition to the United States by the 
appropriate foreign government of Mohammed Abbas for the murder of Leon 
                              Klinghoffer.

Whereas Mohammed Abbas, alias Abu Abbas, was convicted by a Genoan Court in June 
        1986 and sentenced to life in prison, in absentia, for ``kidnaping for 
        terrorist ends that caused the killing of a person'' for his role in the 
        death of an American citizen, Leon Klinghoffer;
Whereas a report from the Italian magistrate who tried the case against Abbas 
        stated that the evidence was ``multiple, unequivocal, and overwhelming'' 
        and that his actions in training and financing for this operation, and 
        in choosing the target, as well as in planning the escape, made Abbas 
        guilty of the murder;
Whereas a warrant for Abbas' arrest was unsealed in October 1985 charging him 
        with hijacking, and a bounty of $250,000 was offered for his arrest;
Whereas the Justice Department felt that it did not have the evidence to convict 
        him, and citing the conviction, albeit in absentia by the Italian 
        authorities, canceled the warrant for his arrest in January 1988;
Whereas, at an April 1996 meeting of the Palestine National Council in Gaza, 
        Abbas described the killing as ``a mistake'' and that Mr. Klinghoffer 
        was killed because he ``had started to incite the passengers against 
        [the kidnapers]'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the Attorney 
General should seek, from the appropriate foreign government, the 
detention and extradition to the United States of Mohammed Abbas (also 
known as Abu Abbas) for the murder of Leon Klinghoffer in October 1985 
during the hijacking of the vessel Achille Lauro.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 11 - STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE




                                                THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                --------------------------------

                                                         1996           1995
                                                     -----------    ----------- 

Primary:
Average shares outstanding                             3,695,000      1,775,000
Net effect of stock and warrant issuances with
    exercise prices below the initial public 
    offering price based on the treasury
    stock method                                            --          151,650
                                                     -----------    ----------- 

Total                                                  3,695,000      1,926,650
                                                     ===========    =========== 

Net loss                                             $  (795,837)   $  (393,139)
                                                     ===========    =========== 

Per share amount                                     $     (0.22)   $     (0.20)
                                                     ===========    ===========
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
Deerfield Resources, Ltd.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
James W. Morgon, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ James W. MorgonName:
      James W. MorgonTitle:
        Chief Executive and Chief Financial OfficerDate:   December
      24, 2009
Exhibit 31.2
I, Dallas G. Smiley, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CitizensFirst Financial Corp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrantand have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 14, 2004
/s/ Dallas G. Smiley
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Gazit-Globe Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Aharon Soffer, President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: April 27, 2012

|                 
|-----------------
|                 
|/s/ Aharon Soffer
|Aharon Soffer    
|President
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 149 (Wednesday, August 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46756-46757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-19613]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID DOD-2011-OS-0083]

Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Missile Defense Agency, Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Notice to Delete a System of Records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Missile Defense Agency proposes to delete a system of 
records notice in its existing inventory of records systems subject to 
the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective without further notice on 
September 2, 2011 unless comments are received which result in a 
contrary determination.

[[Page 46757]]

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by any of the following methods:
    * Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments.
    * Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 1160 Defense 
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general 
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is 
of make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet 
at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, 
including any personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Peter Shearston, Missile Defense 
Agency, MDA/DXCM, 730 Irwin Ave, Schriever AFB, CO 80912-2101, or by 
phone at 719-721-9865.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Missile Defense Agency systems of 
records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as 
amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are available 
from the address in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    The Missile Defense Agency proposes to delete a system of records 
notice from its inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act 
of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion is not 
within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 
U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of a new or 
altered system report.

    Dated: July 28, 2011.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
Deletion
MDA 01

SYSTEM NAME:
    Missile Defense Data Center Catalog System Records (December 15, 
2008, 73 FR 76009)

Reason:
    This system of records application does not store, process, nor 
transmit PII information and should no longer be registered as a system 
of record for PII purposes, therefore can be deleted.

[FR Doc. 2011-19613 Filed 8-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SARAEL MARTINEZ,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-3359

[March 14, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Geoffrey D. Cohen, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

062015CF006729A88810.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Erika Follmer, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allan R. Geesey, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., TAYLOR and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          14,568
<SECURITIES>                                     8,828
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,823
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,485
<PP&E>                                           3,990
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  60,975
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,332
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           204
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,406
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    60,975
<SALES>                                         22,153
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,153
<CGS>                                            5,814
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,730
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (235)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (342)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       145
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (487)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (487)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)


</TABLE>
Page 1 of 1

Meeting Summary 

September 20, 2011, 1:00 PM to 2:00 PM 

Room S-12100, 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA 22202 

Participants

Non-EPA 

American Cleaning Institute: Richard Sedlak, Paul DeLeo, Francis Kruszewski 

Canadian Consumer Specialty Products Association: Yamile Wasslen (by phone) 

Consumer Health Products Association: Barbara Kochanowski (by phone) 

Personal Care Products Council: Farah Ahmed, John Krowka 

BASF: Samantha Champ, Robert Finking, Sascha Pawlowski 

Ecolab: Peter Carlson (by phone) 

Henkel Consumer Goods, Inc.: Carl D’Ruiz, Mary Vihstadt 

The Procter & Gamble Company: Chuck O’Hara 

TOXRAC, LLC (Representing Vivamed): Martin Bernstein 

The Accord Group (Representing Microban): Pat Quinn 

EPA

Office of Pesticide Programs: Steven Bradbury, Jennifer Mclain, Joan Harrigan-Farrelly, 

Tim McMahon, Zoe Layton, Karen Hill, Rebecca von dem Hagen 

Office of Water: Diana Eignor (by phone) 

Office of General Council: Andrea Medici, Chris E. Kaczmarek 

Summary

On Tuesday, September 20, 2011, the Director of the Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) 

and the Antimicrobials Division (AD) hosted a meeting with the American Cleaning 

Institute (ACI) and other groups listed above to discuss the petition to ban triclosan that 

was submitted to EPA by Beyond Pesticides and Food & Water Watch in January 2010. 

EPA posted the petition for a 120-day public comment period beginning in December 

2010. The petition and comments submitted during the public comment period can be 

viewed at regulations.gov in docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0548. 

At the meeting, ACI inquired about the Agency’s decision to post the petition for public 

comment, what the Agency’s next steps are in addressing the petition and the status of 

OPP’s reevaluation of triclosan. At the request of ACI, the Agency also discussed 

collaboration efforts on triclosan internally with the Office of Water and the Office of 

Research and Development and externally with FDA, Canada and others.