alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RECEIVED 

,-U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION t~' 1

• 't i OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

AUG 1 ~ 2013 

WASHINGTON, DC HEARING DOCKET 

In the Matter of ChemSystems, Inc., 

Respondent. 

FAA Docket No.: unassigned 

FDMS No.: FAA-2012-0911 

FAA Region: Western-Pacific 

Judge: Richard C. Goodwin 

COMPLAINANT'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE 

To: Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge, and Respondent, through 

its attorney, Robert Fling, Esq.: 

Complainant, by and through counsel, pursuant to Section 13.218 of the Rules of 

Practice in FAA Civil Penalty Actions, hereby moves to continue the hearing in this matter 

to a later date after October 2013. 

The hearing in this matter is currently scheduled for September 18 and 19, 2013, in 

.• ! 

Houston, Texas. Complainant and Respondent have recently been discussing the possibility 

of settlement, and Complainant would like more time to explore settlement. A continuance 

of the hearing will allow Complainant additional time to contact Respondent, and potentially 

resolve this matter without the necessity of a hearing. ·Based on voicemail exchanges, 

Respondent does not object to a continuance in this matter and would also like to engage in 

settlement negotiations. 

Furthermore, Complainant's counsel has previously-scheduled leave during the latter . \ 

half of August 2013, and was entertaining the possibility of transferring this case for 

preparation and hearing to the Complainant's Southwest Regional Office, in Fort Worth, 
2 

Texas, due to recent budgetary constraints related to travel. Counsel in the Southwest 

Regional Office indicated that they were unable to take such a case to hearing until after 

October 2013. 

Accordingly, Complainant hereby respectfully requests that the hearing in this matter 

be continued until after October 2013. 

Respectfully submitted, 

NAOMI TSUDA 

:~0:~==.:::_:::-___ _ 

Attorney 

Dated: August 9, 2013 
FAA Docket No.: unassigned 

FDMS No.: FAA-2012-0871 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

Document Title: Complainant's Motion for Continuance 

3 

I hereby certifY that on this date I sent via United States mail, postage prepaid, the executed original and 

one copy, as well as one copy by facsimile, of the above-referenced document, addressed as follows: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 

Facsimile: (202) 493-5142 

I further certifY that on this date I sent via United States mail, postage prepaid, one copy, as well as 

one copy by facsimile, of the above-referenced document, addressed as follows: 

Hon. Richard C. Goodwin 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Facsimile: (202) 366-7536 

I further certifY that on this date I sent via United States mail, postage prepaid, one copy, as well as one 

copy by facsimile, of the above-referenced document, addressed as follows: 

Robert Fling, Esq. 

S. Robert Fling, PLLC 

5518 Fifth Street, Suite C 

Katy, TX 77493 

Tel.: (281) 391-2003 

Facsimile: (281) 727-0082
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 53 (Friday, March 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 15365]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05701]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Economic Development Administration


Notice of Petitions by Firms for Determination of Eligibility To 
Apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance

AGENCY: Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce.

ACTION: Notice and opportunity for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Economic Development Administration (EDA) has received 
petitions for certification of eligibility to apply for Trade 
Adjustment Assistance from the firms listed below. Accordingly, EDA has 
initiated investigations to determine whether increased imports into 
the United States of articles like or directly competitive with those 
produced by each of the firms contributed importantly to the total or 
partial separation of the firms' workers, or threat thereof, and to a 
decrease in sales or production of each petitioning firm.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

   List of Petitions Received by EDA for Certification of Eligibility To Apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance
                                          [2/26/2022 through 3/13/2022]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                      Date accepted
               Firm name                        Firm address               for                Product(s)
                                                                      investigation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prospect Life Sciences, Inc............  11025 Dover Street,                3/1/2022  The company manufactures
                                          Westminster, CO 80021.                       medical devices.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any party having a substantial interest in these proceedings may 
request a public hearing on the matter. A written request for a hearing 
must be submitted to the Trade Adjustment Assistance Division, Room 
71030, Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, Washington, DC 20230, no later than ten (10) calendar days 
following publication of this notice. These petitions are received 
pursuant to section 251 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
    Please follow the requirements set forth in EDA's regulations at 13 
CFR 315.8 for procedures to request a public hearing. The Catalog of 
Federal Domestic Assistance official number and title for the program 
under which these petitions are submitted is 11.313, Trade Adjustment 
Assistance for Firms.

Bryan Borlik,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2022-05701 Filed 3-17-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-WH-P
EXHIBIT 31



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED



I, Joseph R. Rozelle, certify that:



1.   I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Seven Seas Acquisition Corporation;



2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  February 15, 2010



/s/    Joseph R. Rozelle

------------------------------------

Joseph R. Rozelle

Principal Executive Officer

and Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32

   CERTIFICATIONS OF JOSEPH R. ROZELLE, PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
     PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER, PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Compass Acquisition
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, the undersigned officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  October 15, 2007                  /s/ Joseph R. Rozelle
                                         --------------------------
                                         JOSEPH R. ROZELLE
                                         Principal Executive Officer
                                         and Principal Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the
Form 10-K pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being
filed as part of the Form 10-K for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference
into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI

NO. 95-KP-00011-SCT

JOSEPH YORK

v.

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED,

PURSUANT TO M.R.A.P. 35-A

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/07/94

TRIAL JUDGE: HON. EUGENE BOGEN

COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: WASHINGTON CO. CIRCUIT COURT

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: PRO SE

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

BY: BILLY GORE

DISTRICT ATTORNEY FRANK CARLTON

NATURE OF THE CASE: CRIMINAL - POST CONVICTION RELIEF

DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED - 4/3/97

MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED:

MANDATE ISSUED:

BEFORE PRATHER, P.J., ROBERTS AND MILLS, JJ.

PRATHER, PRESIDING JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT:

This case arises from the denial of post-conviction relief to Joseph York, who had previously pled

guilty to the sale of cocaine. York alleges that he did not receive a speedy trial because of the delay

from his commission of the crime until his indictment. However, the record reflects that York was

indicted well within the two-year period of limitations prescribed by statute; therefore, York's

argument on this point is without merit. See Miss. Code Ann. § 99-1-5 (Supp. 1996).

York also contends that his indictment was fatally insufficient. He alleges that the indictment did not

comply with Mississippi Uniform Criminal Rule of Circuit Court Practice 2.05 and that the indictment

did not comply with Article 6, § 169 of the Mississippi Constitution, which requires that the

indictment "conclude against the peace and dignity of the state." The record reflects that the

indictment does contain that phrase, followed by "A TRUE BILL," the signatures of the State's
Attorney and the Grand Jury Foreman, the filing and recording information, and the signature of the

Circuit Clerk. York does not argue that the indictment fails to contain this phrase, rather he argues

that the indictment fails to "conclude" with the phrase "against the peace and dignity of the State."

By failing to raise the sufficiency of the indictment at the trial level and failing to demur from the

indictment as required by statute, and by entry of his guilty plea, York has waived these objections to

the sufficiency of the indictment. Brandau v. State, 662 So. 2d 1051, 1053-54 (Miss. 1995); Conerly

v. State, 607 So. 2d 1153, 1156 (Miss. 1992); Brooks v. State, 573 So. 2d 1350, 1352 (Miss. 1990);

Miss. Code Ann. § 99-39-21 (Supp. 1996); Miss. Code Ann. § 99-7-21 (Supp. 1996). Therefore, the

denial of York's motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed, per curiam.

DENIAL OF POST-CONVICTION RELIEF AFFIRMED.

LEE, C.J., SULLIVAN, P.J., PITTMAN, BANKS, McRAE, ROBERTS, SMITH AND

MILLS, JJ., CONCUR.
STEAM ELECTRIC

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: ________________________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.

SE04360A166
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LORAL SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS LTD. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         565,485
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  423,754
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,626
<INVENTORY>                                    182,986
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,249,946
<PP&E>                                       2,013,122
<DEPRECIATION>                                 219,798
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,512,972
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          474,959
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    736,320
<COMMON>                                         2,441
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,136,135
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,512,972
<SALES>                                        247,830
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               305,926
<CGS>                                          215,299
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  260,251
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,839
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,201)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,397    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (50,108)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (50,108)      
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.17)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of SEA 2 SKY CORPORATION on Form 10-KSB for
the period  ended  August 31, 2007,  as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Sandra Rose,  Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 27, 2007



By:       /s/ Sandra Rose
         ---------------------
         Sandra Rose
         Chief Financial Officer, principal financial officer
         and principal accounting officer
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 306

To state the sense of the Senate that the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation

and Security Between the United States of America and Japan is essential for furthering the security interests of the United States, Japan

and the nations of the Asia-Pacific and that the people of Okinawa

deserve recognition for their contributions toward ensuring the Treaty’s

implementation.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 30, 1996

Mr. ROTH (for himself, Mr. THOMAS, and Mr. NUNN) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

RESOLUTION

To state the sense of the Senate that the Treaty of Mutual

Cooperation and Security Between the United States of

America and Japan is essential for furthering the security interests of the United States, Japan and the nations of the Asia-Pacific and that the people of Okinawa

deserve recognition for their contributions toward ensuring the Treaty’s implementation.

Whereas the Senate finds that the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security Between the United States of America

and Japan is critical to the security interests of the

United States, Japan and the nations of the Asian Pacific region;
2

SRES 306 IS

Whereas the bilateral security relationship is the foundation

for U.S. security strategy in Asia and the Pacific;

Whereas strong bilateral security ties provide a key stabilizing influence in an uncertain post-Cold War world;

Whereas the bilateral security relationship makes it possible

for the United States to preserve its interests in the Asia

Pacific region;

Whereas U.S. forward-deployed forces are welcomed by our

allies in the region because they are critical for maintaining stability in East Asia;

Whereas the recognition by our allies of the importance of

American troops for regional security confers on the

United States irreplaceable good will and diplomatic influence in the Asia Pacific;

Whereas Japan’s host nation support is a key element in the

U.S. ability to maintain forward-deployed forces;

Whereas the people of Okinawa have borne a disproportionate

share of the burdens of Japan’s host nation support for

America’s bases in Japan;

Whereas the Governments of the United States and Japan

have made a commitment to reducing the burdens of

U.S. forces on the people of Okinawa; and

Whereas gaining the support of the people of Okinawa in this

process is crucial to effective implementation of the Treaty: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that—

2 (1) the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Se3 curity Between the United States of America and

4 Japan remains vital to American and Japanese secu-
3

SRES 306 IS

1 rity interests as well as the security interests of the

2 Nations of the Asia-Pacific region; and

3 (2) the people of Okinawa deserve special rec4 ognition and gratitude for their contributions toward

5 ensuring the Treaty’s implementation.

Æ
#### Bernard L. GREER, on behalf of himself and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of WEST VIRGINIA, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-2046

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 30, 2018

Decided: February 1, 2018

Bernard L. Greer, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas M. Johnson, Jr., Deputy Solicitor, Zachary Aaron Viglianco, Assistant Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bernard L. Greer appeals from the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint in which he challenged the constitutionality of West Virginia’s felon dispossession law, which, unlike the federal statute, prohibits the possession of an antique firearm by a convicted felon. *See*18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(3)(D) (2012); W. Va. Code Ann. § 61-7-7(a)(1) (LexisNexis Supp. 2017); W. Va. Code Ann. § 61-7-2(11) (LexisNexis 2014). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Greer v. State of West Virginia,*No. 1:16-cv-00142-IMK-MJA, 2017 WL 3620033 (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 23, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Microsoft December 26, 2013

VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION
The Rules Docket (AGC 200) Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

Re: Renewal of Exemption No. 9996, Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2009

- 1034

The let ter serves as a request for a renewal of Exemption No 9996, Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2009

- 1034 , currently due to expire January 31, 2014

The North Bay Air Museum is operating North American F

- 51

- D (registration No. N51GP, serial No 44

- 74483) and a Curtiss P

- 40

- N5, registration No. N540TP serial No. 42

- 105306, for the purpose of carrying passengers for hire on local flights for educational and instructional purposes under the terms and conditions of Exemption 9996.

The North Bay Air Muse um continues to hold a determin ation from the IRS as a 50 1 (c) (3) charitable organization and all the conditions associated with our program and the reasons presented with our original petit ion remain unchanged.

Please feel free to conta c t me at (707) 934

- 5158 with any questions you may have. Thank you for your time and attention.

Sincerely,

Sheryl Carlucci Executive Director North Bay Air Museum
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906 OF THE**
 **SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 I, Patrick J. Goodman, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 
 
 
 
 Date:  November 4, 2004
 
 
 /s/ Patrick J. Goodman
 Patrick J. Goodman
 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 (chief financial officer)