alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF PICK  COMMUNICATIONS  CORP. FOR SEPTEMBER 30,
1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001006282
<NAME>                        PICK Communications Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         144,110
<SECURITIES>                                   5,866,875
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,601,576
<ALLOWANCES>                                   389,921
<INVENTORY>                                    87,288
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,139,075
<PP&E>                                         219,876
<DEPRECIATION>                                 71,783
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 10,759,668
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,601,288
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       86,485
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,366,214
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   10,759,668
<SALES>                                        5,171,272
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               13,658,352
<CGS>                                          6,257,220
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8,610,339
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             782
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,084,945
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,808,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            210,151
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                53,080
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,276,945
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.07
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of FFD Financial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Trent B. Troyer, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


|                                      |  | 
|------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Trent B. Troyer                   |  | 
|Trent B. Troyer                       |  | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|February 14, 2011                     |  |
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 4, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51163 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MAURILIO CRUZ-MORENO, also known as Juan Ruelas-Garcia, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-570-ALL

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Maurilio CruzMoreno raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6317 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to ensure that veterans with serviceconnected disabilities related to mental health are not barred, because 

of such disabilities, from readjustment counseling and related mental 

health services under such title, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 15, 2016 

Mr. O’ROURKE (for himself, Mr. JONES, and Ms. JUDY CHU of California) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to ensure that veterans with service-connected disabilities related to mental 

health are not barred, because of such disabilities, from 

readjustment counseling and related mental health services under such title, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veteran Mental Health 

5 Care Expansion Act of 2016’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6317 IH

1 SEC. 2. ACCESS TO MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES FOR VET2 ERANS WITH SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABIL3 ITIES RELATED TO MENTAL HEALTH. 

4 Section 5303 of title 38, United States Code, is 

5 amended by adding at the end the following new sub6 section: 

7 ‘‘(f) If the Secretary determines that at the time of 

8 the commission of an offense leading to a person’s court9 martial, discharge, or resignation, such person had a serv10 ice-connected disability related to mental health, sub11 section (a) shall not apply to counseling and related men12 tal health services available to such person under section 

13 1712A of this title.’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  March 5, 2010By:
    
    /s/ Amir Bassan-EskenaziName:
    
    Amir Bassan-EskenaziTitle:
    
    President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
  March 5, 2010By:Name:
    
    /s/ Maurice L. Castonguay

Maurice L. CastonguayTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of US Highland, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/Damian Riddoch
                                 ----------------------
                                 Damian Riddoch
                                 Chief Financial Officer

April 1, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 18 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 18

   Relating to the reappointment of Michael Davidson as Senate Legal 
                                Counsel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Lott (for Mr. Dole) submitted the following resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Relating to the reappointment of Michael Davidson as Senate Legal 
                                Counsel.

    Resolved, That the reappointment of Michael Davidson to be Senate 
Legal Counsel made by the President pro tempore of the Senate this day 
is effective as of January 3, 1995, and the term of service of the 
appointee shall expire at the end of the One Hundred Fifth Congress.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS OF NETLOJIX COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS
OF JUNE 30, 1999 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATION FOR THE
SIX MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK>   0001005974
<NAME>  NETLOJIX COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             337
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,260
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,846
<PP&E>                                             816
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,020
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,041
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           105
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,599
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,020
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,869
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,460
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,974
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  86
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,643)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,643)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (2,544)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,187)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.52)


</TABLE>
**NANOVIRICIDES
      INC.**





Exhibit
      32.1


CERTIFICATION
      OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 USC 1350


(Section
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





I,
      Eugene Seymour, Chief Executive Officer of NanoViricides, Inc. (the
“Company”), certify, that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of
      the annual report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 of the
      Company (the “Report”):





1.      The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  October
      15, 2007





/s/Eugene SeymourEugene SeymourChief
                Executive Officer, Director
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00293-CR

Michael Wayne Perry

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 297th District Court

of Tarrant County (1302260D)

June 11, 2015

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot______________

 Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                           4,495
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,532
<ALLOWANCES>                                       795
<INVENTORY>                                     51,763
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,502
<PP&E>                                          43,884
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 135,279
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,562
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           127
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,235
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   135,279
<SALES>                                        264,982
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               275,369
<CGS>                                          180,120
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  247,421
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,169
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,661
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    118
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (237)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       355
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7118

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RICHARD ALLEN SMITH, JR., a/k/a Smitty

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., 

Senior District Judge. (2:00-cr-00007-FPS-JES-1)

Submitted: November 18, 2014 Decided: November 21, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Allen Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Donald 

Warner, Assistant United States Attorney, Elkins, West Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Richard Allen Smith, Jr., seeks to appeal his 2002 

criminal judgment.1 The version of Federal Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 4(b)(1)(A) in effect at the time of Smith’s conviction 

required a defendant to file a notice of appeal within ten days 

after the entry of judgment. With or without a motion, upon a 

showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court 

may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of 

appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 

F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985).

The district court entered judgment on March 20, 2002. 

Smith filed the present notice of appeal on July 23, 2014,2 more 

than twelve years beyond the expiration of the then-applicable

ten-day appeal period and subsequent thirty-day excusable 

neglect period. Because Smith failed to file a timely notice of 

appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period, we dismiss 

 1 This court previously affirmed Smith’s convictions and 

sentence. United States v. Smith, 51 F. App’x 415 (4th Cir. 

2002) (No. 02-4260) (unpublished).

2 For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date 

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could 

have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to 

the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 

(1988). 
3

the appeal.3 We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED

 3 Although the timely filing of a notice of appeal in a 

criminal case is not a jurisdictional requirement, United 

States v. Urutyan, 564 F.3d 679, 685 (4th Cir. 2009), Smith’s

appeal is inordinately late. Accordingly, we exercise our 

inherent power to dismiss it. United States v. Mitchell, 518 

F.3d 740, 750 (10th Cir. 2008).
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mustafa MUHAMMAD, Defendant-Appellant. *198United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mustafa Muhammad, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-7258, No. 17-7430

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 21, 2017

Decided: December 28, 2017

Mustafa Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Heather Hart Mansfield, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In No. 17-7258, Mustafa Muhammad appeals the denial of his motion for recusal, and in No. 17-7430, he appeals the denial of his Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 motion for new trial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Muhammad,*No. 3:14-cr-00066-REP-DJN-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 12, 2017; Oct. 11, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Order entered February 4, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00429-CR

NATISHA MORGAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1271566-K

ORDER

The Court GRANTS appellant’s January 30, 2015 motion to supplement the record. We 

ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this 

order, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a copy of appellant’s pro se notice of appeal that 

bears the April 7, 2014 file-stamp from this Court and the August 20, 2014 file-stamp of the 

Dallas County District Clerk.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Felicia 

Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk, and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
No. 07-18-00243-CR

Juslet Joseph

Appellant

v.

The State of Texas

Appellee §

§

§

§ From the 181st District Court

of Potter County

July 16, 2018

Opinion Per Curiam

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated July 16, 2018

, it is ordered, adjudged

and decreed that the appeal is abated, and the cause is remanded to the 181st District

Court of Potter County, Texas for further proceedings in accordance with this Court’s

opinion entered this day.

o O o
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                --------------


                                CERTIFICATIONS
                                --------------

I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


      1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
            10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
            report on Form 10-K of CWABS Asset-Backed Certificates Trust
            2006-23 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as
            a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
            omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
            made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
            were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
            this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
            other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the
            period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act
            periodic reports;

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
            conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s)
            required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and
            except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the
            servicer(s) have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
            agreement(s) in all material respects; and

      5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
            criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
            reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
            asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
            accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
            13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
            except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
            instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
            disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
      information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
      Bank of New York, as Trustee.

Date: March 26, 2007


      /s/ Steve Bailey
      -----------------------------
      Steve Bailey
      Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Real Paper Displays, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Malcolm D. Lennie, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
                April 14, 2008
            
            /s/
                Malcolm D. LennieBy:
                Malcolm D. LennieIts:
                Chief Executive Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Real Paper Displays, Inc. and will be retained by Real Paper Displays, Inc.
      and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.