alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 164 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 164

Expressing the sense of the Senate that America's World War II veterans 
     and their families are deserving of this Nation's respect and 
 appreciation on the fiftieth anniversary of the end of the war in the 
                                Pacific.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               August 11 (legislative day, July 10), 1995

    Mr. Dole (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Senate that America's World War II veterans 
     and their families are deserving of this Nation's respect and 
 appreciation on the fiftieth anniversary of the end of the war in the 
                                Pacific.
Whereas on August 14, 1945, the Japanese Government accepted the Allied terms of 
        surrender;
Whereas the formal documents of surrender were signed on September 2, 1945, 
        thereby ending World War II;
Whereas fifty years have now passed since those events; and
Whereas the courage and sacrifice of the American fighting men and women who 
        served with distinction in the Pacific and Asian theaters should always 
        be remembered: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the United States Senate joins with a grateful 
Nation in expressing our respect and appreciation to the men and women 
who served in World War II, and their families. Further, we remember 
and pay tribute to those Americans who made the ultimate sacrifice and 
gave their life for their country.
                                 <all>
```
#### Jeffrey Brian COHEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rod J. ROSENSTEIN, US Attorney; Harry Mason Gruber, Asst. US Attorney; Joyce Kallam McDonald, Asst. US Attorney, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-7313

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 31, 2017

Decided: June 8, 2017

Jeffrey Brian Cohen, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Paul Phelps, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Brian Cohen seeks to appeal the district court’s order staying his civil suit against federal prosecutors pending resolution of his criminal direct appeal, as well aé its order granting in part and denying in part Cohen’s motion for reconsideration. As a threshold inquiry to any appeal, we are obliged to satisfy ourselves of our jurisdiction to hear the matter. *See Clark v. Cartledge,*829 F.3d 303, 305 (4th Cir. 2016); *United States v. Bullard,*645 F.3d *725237, 246 (4th Cir. 2011). We may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 64(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 546-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Cohen seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. *See Moses H. Cone Mem’l Hosp. v. Mercury Constr. Corp.,*460 U.S. 1, 11 n.11, 103 S.Ct. 927, 74 L.Ed.2d 765 (1983); *Amdur v. Lizars,*372 F.2d 103, 105-06 (4th Cir. 1967). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
#### IN RE: Felix A. OKAFOR, Petitioner.

No. 17-2163

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 31, 2018

Decided: February 13, 2018

Felix A. Okafor, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Felix A. Okafor petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court dismissed Okafor’s motion on December 18, 2017. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Okafor’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED*
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of FFD Financial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Trent B. Troyer, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


|                                      |  | 
|------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/Trent B. Troyer                    |  | 
|Trent B. Troyer                       |  | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|November 16, 2009                     |  |
Exhibit 31(ii)


                                CERTIFICATIONS
                                --------------

I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


      1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
            10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
            report on Form 10-K of Alternative Loan Trust 2006-43CB (the
            "Exchange Act periodic reports");

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as
            a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
            omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
            made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
            were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
            this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
            other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the
            period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act
            periodic reports;

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
            conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s)
            required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and
            except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the
            servicer(s) have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
            agreement(s) in all material respects; and

      5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
            criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
            reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
            asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
            accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
            13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
            except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
            instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
            disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
      information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
      Bank of New York, as Trustee.

Date: March 28, 2007


      /s/ Steve Bailey
      -----------------------
      Steve Bailey
      Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial data schedule information extracted 
from the Form 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,885
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             288
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     25,465
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             500
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               500
<LOANS>                                        229,022
<ALLOWANCE>                                        602
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 271,573
<DEPOSITS>                                     198,043
<SHORT-TERM>                                       500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,881
<LONG-TERM>                                     31,910
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            28
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,211
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 271,573
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,885
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,024
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 9,909
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,843
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,686
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,223
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      150
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  11
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,457
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,414
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,414
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       865
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.31
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   0.033
<LOANS-NON>                                        205
<LOANS-PAST>                                       531
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   349
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   512
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       60
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  602
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               602
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            580
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 190 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 190

 To authorize the printing of a revised edition of the Senate Election 
                             Law Guidebook.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 31, 1995

     Mr. Warner (for himself and Mr. Ford) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To authorize the printing of a revised edition of the Senate Election 
                             Law Guidebook.

    Resolved, That the Committee on Rules and Administration is 
directed to prepare a revised edition of the Senate Election Law 
Guidebook, Senate Document 103-13, and that such document shall be 
printed as a Senate document.
    Sec. 2. There shall be printed 600 additional copies of the 
document specified in section 1 of this resolution for the use of the 
Committee on Rules and Administration.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INTERNALLY
PREPARED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE 6 MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR PERIOD
ENDED JANUARY 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                          15,295
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,144
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,379
<PP&E>                                           2,618
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 145,422
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,783
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        95,452
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,676
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   145,422
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                89,877
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,947
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,819
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,880
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,939
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,939
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .45
        

</TABLE>
#### Reina Marisol Ramos DE CHACON; V.K.C.R.; A.J.C.R., Petitioners, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 17-1441

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 27, 2017

Decided: November 3, 2017

Abdoul Konare, KONARE LAW, Frederick, Maryland, for Petitioners. Chad A. Readier, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Anthony W. Norwood, Senior Litigation Counsel, Greg D. Mack, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before ÑIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Reina Marisol Ramos De Chacon and her two daughters, natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing their appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of De Chacon’s application for asylum. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of De Chacon’s merits hearing before the immigration court and all sup*275porting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, *see*8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision. *See INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 481, 112 S.Ct 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED*
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Guy Christopher MANNINO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-30149

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 8, 2017 * Seattle, Washington

Filed December 12, 2017

*356Joseph William Bottini, I, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Jo Ann Farrington, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Anchorage, AK, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Carlton Gunn, Esquire, Attorney, Kaye, McLane, Bednarski & Litt, LLP, Pasadena, CA, for'Defendant-Appellant

Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Guy Christopher Mannino appeals his jury conviction for three counts of solicitation of murder in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 373. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

1. Sufficient evidence supports Manni-no’s convictions. *United States v. Romero,*282 F.3d 683, 686 (9th Cir. 2002). The evidence allowed reasonable jurors to conclude, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Mannino had the requisite intent to solicit the murders. Julius Chambers testified that Mannino asked him to commit the murders, provided him with information about the victims, suggested ways to commit the murders, offered him access to weapons and explosives with which to commit the murders, a place to stay, and aid in escaping. The government presented audio recordings in which Mannino discussed the murder plots with Chambers. And the trial court submitted notes and diagrams detailing Mannino’s murder plots—either written by Chambers at the direction of Man-nino or written by Mannino himself.

2. There was no error in failing to provide a renunciation defense instruction *sua*sponte. Mannino did not request such an instruction nor did he rely on the defense in his theory of the case. *United States v. Montgomery,*150 F.3d 983, 996 (9th Cir. 1998). Thus, there was no duty to give the instruction.

3.The alleged instances of prosecutorial misconduct were harmless given the overwhelming evidence of Mannino’s guilt. *United States v. Alcantara-Castillo,*788 F.3d 1186, 1190-91 (9th Cir. 2015).

AFFIRMED.

**

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 101

Expressing the sense of the Senate in support of extending some of the

benefits of enhanced economic relations enjoyed by the United States

and Israel to those countries that sustain a ‘‘warm’’ peace with Israel.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 4 (legislative day, MARCH 27), 1995

Mr. BROWN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Finance

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate in support of extending

some of the benefits of enhanced economic relations enjoyed by the United States and Israel to those countries

that sustain a ‘‘warm’’ peace with Israel.

Whereas the Congress approved a free trade agreement with

Israel on April 29, 1985;

Whereas the free trade agreement with Israel was designed

to increase United States economic ties with Israel;

Whereas the goal of United States policy in the Middle East

is to achieve a lasting peace that brings economic integration and development in the region;

Whereas economic integration and development in the Middle

East can only be achieved through a ‘‘warm’’ peace in

which diplomats are exchanged, the Arab boycott of Is-
2

•SRES 101 IS

rael has been eliminated, close cooperation between Israel

and her neighbors to combat terrorism and international

criminal activity has been established, mutual security

agreements have been concluded, and agreements have

been reached that mutually reduce barriers to the free

flow of goods, people, and ideas; and

Whereas a ‘‘warm’’ peace in the Middle East between Israel

and her neighbors should be based upon trade and expanding economic development: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the

2 President should—

3 (1) expand the free trade agreement between

4 the United States and Israel to include those coun5 tries that sustain a ‘‘warm’’ peace with Israel;

6 (2) prior to such expansion, and annually there7 after, certify to the Congress that such country or

8 countries have entered into a ‘‘warm’’ peace with Is9 rael that includes—

10 (A) the recognition of Israel and establish11 ment of full diplomatic relations with Israel, in12 cluding the exchange of ambassadors;

13 (B) eliminating all levels of the Arab boy14 cott of Israel;

15 (C) a commitment to a quick response to

16 condemn and punish acts of international ter17 rorism and those who perpetrate them;
3

•SRES 101 IS

1 (D) working closely with United States and

2 Israel to remove havens for international terror3 ists;

4 (E) mutual security agreements with Is5 rael;

6 (F) extradition agreements with Israel on

7 reciprocal treatment of terrorists; and

8 (G) agreements with Israel which ensure

9 the mutual reduction of barriers to the free flow

10 of goods and people; and

11 (3) not extend any preferences or trade induce12 ments to a country that is a state-sponsor of terror13 ism.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Euro Group of Companies, Inc.
(formerly ICT Technologies, Inc.), a Delaware corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

     (1)  The Report of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
          section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                             /s/  Vasilios Koutsobinas
                                             -----------------------------------
                                                  Vasilios Koutsobinas
                                                  Chief Executive Officer

November 25, 2009