alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           6,972
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           4,426
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         103,574
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           103,514
<LOANS>                                        439,390
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,055
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 570,400
<DEPOSITS>                                     462,340
<SHORT-TERM>                                     7,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,839
<LONG-TERM>                                     12,994
<COMMON>                                        40,168
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,059
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 570,400
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,843
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,735
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    50
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                10,628
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,908
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,178
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,450
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       15
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,663
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,230
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,420
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,420
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.79
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,417
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  4,713
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,196
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      157
<RECOVERIES>                                         1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,055
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               158
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            897
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.19

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

U.S. $______________                                     Los Angeles, California
                                                         ___________, 200_

         1. FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, USDataworks, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, located at 21621 Nordhoff Street, Chatsworth, CA 91311
("Borrower"), promises to pay to the order of Charles Ramey, an individual,
located at 6 Cypress Ridge Lane, Sugarland, Texas ("Lender") or at such other
place or to such other party or parties as the holder hereof may designate, the
principal sum of U.S. $___________ (____________ U.S. Dollars).

         2. Borrower promises to make one payment constituting the principal and
all accrued interest on demand. Interest on the note shall accrue from the date
of execution at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum.

         3. Borrower agrees that this Note shall become immediately due and
payable without notice or demand, upon default of the payment required by
paragraph two or alternatively upon Lender's three (3) day notice to Borrower.

         4. Should the indebtedness represented by this Note or any part thereof
be collected at lave or in equity or through any bankruptcy (including without
limitation, any action for relief from the automatic stay of any bankruptcy
proceeding), receivership, probate or other court proceeding or by any judicial
or non-judicial foreclosure proceeding, or if this Note is placed in the hands
of attorneys for collection after default, Borrower agrees to pay, in addition
to the principal payable hereon, interest accruing from the date of default in
the amount of 1.5% per month or the highest rate allowable under law, reasonable
attorneys' fees and collection costs and expenses.

         5. This Note shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the
laws of the State of California and venue for any action result from the default
of this note shall be venued in California Superior Court in Los Angeles County.

         6. If any provision of this Note is held invalid, unenforceable, or
void, then the remainder of this Note shall continue in full force and effect.

                                               USDataworks, Inc. "Burrower"

                                               By:
                                                  ------------------------------

                                               Its:
                                                   -----------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS OF AVTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF
JUNE 30, 1999 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX
MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             685
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,005
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,104
<PP&E>                                           1,964
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,431
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,875
<BONDS>                                          2,227
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           105
<OTHER-SE>                                         949
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,431
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,651
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,645
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,993
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 213
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,187)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,187)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,187)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.52)


</TABLE>
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 295

To designate October 18, 1996, as ‘‘National Mammography Day’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 18, 1996

Mr. BIDEN (for himself, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. BRADLEY, Mr. BRYAN, Mr. BURNS, Mr. CHAFEE,

Mr. COHEN, Mr. COVERDELL, Mr. D’AMATO, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. FORD, Mr. FRIST, Mr.

GLENN, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. GREGG, Mr. HATCH, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr.

INOUYE, Mr. JOHNSTON, Mrs. KASSEBAUM, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr.

LEAHY, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. LOTT, Mr. MACK, Mr.

MCCAIN, Ms. MIKULSKI, Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mr.

MURKOWSKI, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. PELL, Mr. REID, Mr. ROBB, Mr.

ROCKEFELLER, Mr. ROTH, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. SIMON, Mr. SMITH, Ms.

SNOWE, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. THURMOND, Mr.

WELLSTONE, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. KERREY, and Mr. SIMPSON) submitted

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the

Judiciary

SEPTEMBER 25, 1996

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To designate October 18, 1996, as ‘‘National Mammography

Day’’.

Whereas, according to the American Cancer Society, 184,300

women will be diagnosed with breast cancer in 1996, and

44,300 women will die from this disease;
2

SRES 295 ATS

Whereas, in the decade of the 1990’s, it is estimated that

about 2,000,000 women will be diagnosed with breast

cancer, resulting in nearly 500,000 deaths;

Whereas the risk of breast cancer increases with age, with a

woman at age 70 having twice as much of a chance of

developing the disease than a woman at age 50;

Whereas at least 80 percent of the women who get breast

cancer have no family history of the disease;

Whereas mammograms, when operated professionally at a

certified facility, can provide a safe and quick diagnosis;

Whereas experts agree that mammography is the best method

of early detection of breast cancer, and early detection is

the key to saving lives; and

Whereas mammograms can reveal the presence of small cancers of up to 2 years or more before regular clinical

breast examination or breast self-examination (BSE),

saving as many as 30 percent more lives: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates October 18,

2 1996, as ‘‘National Mammography Day’’. The Senate re3 quests that the President issue a proclamation calling

4 upon the people of the United States to observe such day

5 with appropriate programs and activities.

Æ
|          |          
|--------- | ---------
|<PAGE> 45 | Form 10-Q

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Patricia F. Russo, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Lucent Technologies Inc. (the Company), and John A. Kritzmacher,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | the Quarterly
  Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30,
  2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | (2) | the information
  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
  financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                               

Date: August 8, 2006

|                                       | 
|-------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Patricia F.
  Russo                | 
|                                       | 
|Patricia F. Russo                      | 
|Chairman and Chief
  Executive Officer | 

|                          | 
|------------------------- | 
|/s/ John A.
  Kritzmacher | 
|                          | 
|John A.
  Kritzmacher     | 
|Chief Financial
  Officer | 
|                          | 

---
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12
 
                       LORAL SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS LTD.
 
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)
                                  (UNAUDITED)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                 SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                              -------------------
                                                                1998       1997
                                                              --------    -------
<S>                                                           <C>         <C>
Earnings
  Income (loss) before income taxes, equity in net loss of
     affiliates and minority interest.......................  $ (7,283)   $32,259
  Plus:
     Interest expense.......................................    80,386     29,918
     Interest component of rent expense(1)..................     3,379      2,819
  Less capitalized interest.................................    42,298     13,777
                                                              --------    -------
Earnings available to cover fixed charges...................  $ 34,184    $51,219
                                                              ========    =======
Fixed charges(2)............................................  $130,133    $64,783
                                                              ========    =======
Deficiency of earnings to cover fixed charges...............  $ 95,949    $13,564
                                                              ========    =======
</TABLE>
 
---------------
(1) The interest component of rent expense is deemed to be approximately 25% of
    total expense.
 
(2) Fixed charges include preferred dividends as adjusted for the Company's
    effective tax rate.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 6, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-31059

Summary Calendar

 

EDWARD SMITH,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION INC.; ET AL.,

Defendants,

AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:04-CV-284

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Edward Smith (“Smith”) appeals from the district court’s

denial of his motion for relief from judgment in which he

challenged the district court’s dismissal of his claim against

the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”) on the basis of

arbitral immunity. Smith has filed a motion for leave to proceed
No. 04-31059

-2-

in forma pauperis (“IFP”) on appeal following the district

court’s denial of IFP status. 

A movant for leave to proceed IFP on appeal must show that

he is a pauper and the appeal is taken in good faith, i.e., the

appeal presents nonfrivolous issues. Carson v. Polley, 689 F.2d

562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Smith asserts

that the AAA is not immune from civil liability because the

arbitrator engaged in “non judicial action” regarding his motion

for contempt. Smith cites to Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9 (1991)

in support of his argument. 

As the district court determined, Smith’s reliance on

Mireles is misplaced. Mireles supports the district court’s

determination that the arbitrator’s actions in the instant case,

relating to the disposition of Smith’s motion for contempt, was

an action taking in the arbitrator’s quasi-judicial capacity in

the administration of the arbitration proceedings. See Mireles,

502 U.S. at 12. As such, the claim against the AAA is barred by

arbitral immunity. See Hawkins v. Nat’l Ass’n of Sec. Dealers,

Inc., 149 F.3d 330, 332 (5th Cir. 1998). Thus, the district

court did not abuse its discretion in denying Smith’s motion for

relief from judgment. See Carimi v. Royal Carribean Cruise Line,

Inc., 959 F.2d 1344, 1345 (5th Cir. 1992).

Smith has failed to show that he will raise any nonfrivolous

issues for appeal. Accordingly, his IFP motion is DENIED, and

his appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 
No. 04-31059

-3-

Smith is WARNED that he may be subject to sanctions if he makes

any further frivolous filings. 

MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11



                                 BACOU USA, INC.
                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                 -----------------------------------------------
                                   (in thousands)
                                    (unaudited)



   
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                          Three Months Ended    Six Months Ended
                                               June 30,             June 30,
                                          ------------------   -----------------
                                           1998        1997     1998       1997
                                          -------    -------   -------   -------
                                                              (Restated)
<S>                                        <C>        <C>       <C>       <C>   

Basic:
  Weighted average shares outstanding      17,599     17,312    17,596    17,312
                                          =======    =======    ======   =======

  Net income                              $ 6,099    $ 4,245   $ 8,835   $ 8,377
                                          =======    =======   -------   -------
  Per share amount                        $  0.35    $  0.24   $  0.50   $  0.48
                                          =======    =======   =======   =======

Diluted:

  Weighted average shares outstanding      17,599     17,312    17,596    17,312

  Net effect of dilutive stock options
   based on the treasury stock method
   using the average market price             132          2        92         6
                                          -------    -------   -------   -------
 Total diluted shares                      17,731     17,314    17,688    17,318
                                          =======    =======   =======   =======
  Net income                              $ 6,099    $ 4,245   $ 8,835   $ 8,377
                                          =======    =======   =======   =======
  Per share amount                        $  0.35    $  0.24   $  0.50   $  0.48
                                          =======    =======   =======   =======
</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 32004D0164 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32004D0164

**2004/164/EC: Commission Decision of 19 February 2004 amending Decision 2004/130/EC providing for the temporary marketing of certain seed of the species Vicia faba L., not satisfying the requirements of Council Directive 66/401/EEC (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2004) 492) **

*
Official Journal L 052 , 21/02/2004 P. 0077 - 0077 *

Commission Decision

of 19 February 2004

amending Decision 2004/130/EC providing for the temporary marketing of certain seed of the species Vicia faba L., not satisfying the requirements of Council Directive 66/401/EEC

(notified under document number C(2004) 492)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2004/164/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 66/401/EEC of 14 June 1966 on the marketing of fodder plant seed(1), as last amended by Directive 2003/61/EC(2), and in particular Article 17, paragraph 1 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Pursuant to Commission Decision 2004/130/EC(3), the marketing in the Community of seed of spring field beans which does not satisfy the minimum germination requirements laid down in Directive 66/401/EEC was authorised in accordance with defined terms and subject to certain conditions for a period expiring on 15 February 2004.

(2) The period left to market seed at the less stringent germination requirements, until 15 February 2004, will be insufficient.

(3) Consequently, the authorisation should be extended and Decision 2004/130/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.

(4) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Seeds and Propagating Material for Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION

Article 1

In Article 1 of Decision 2004/130/EC the date "15 February 2004" is replaced by the date "31 March 2004".

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 February 2004.

For the Commission

David Byrne

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ 125, 11.7.1966, p. 2298/66.

(2) OJ L 165, 3.7.2003, p. 23.

(3) OJ L 37, 10.2.2004, p. 32.