alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Annual Report of ecoTECH Energy Group Inc., a Nevada corporation, (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, C. Victor Hall, President of the Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ C. Victor HallC. Victor Hall,President(Principal Executive Officer)March 31, 2011
EXHIBIT 13.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the amendment no. 2 to the annual report on Form 20-F/A of Fuwei Films (Holdings) Co., Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Xiaoan He and Xiuyong Zhang, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of our knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this certification is being furnished and not deemed filed.









/s/ Xiaoan HeXiaoan He

Chief Executive Officer





/s/ Xiuyong
ZhangXiuyong Zhang

Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 36 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 36

Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make technical corrections in 
                       the enrollment of S. 1060.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 13, 1995

  Mr. Levin submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                         considered and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make technical corrections in 
                       the enrollment of S. 1060.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill S. 1060, to provide for the 
disclosure of lobbying activities to influence the Federal Government, 
and for other purposes, the Secretary of the Senate shall make the 
following corrections:
            (1) In section 6(8), strike ``6'' and insert ``7''
            (2) In section 9(7), insert ``and'' after the semicolon, in 
        section 9(8), strike ``; and'' and insert a period, and strike 
        paragraph (9) of section 9.
            (3) In section 12(c), strike ``7'' and insert ``6''.
            (4) In section 15(a)(2), strike ``8'' and insert ``7''.
            (5) In section 15(b)(1), strike ``, 5(a)(2),'' and in 
        section 15(b)(2), strike ``8'' and insert ``7''.
            (6) In section 24(b), strike ``13, 14, 15, and 16'' and 
        insert ``9, 10, 11, and 12''.
            (7) In section 12(b)(1), strike ``7'' and insert in lieu 
        thereof ``6''.
                                 <all>
```
**TKP** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19
- 0422 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. JACK ELDON JARVEY,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30
-day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including June 20 , 202 1 , within which to prepare, serve, and file the State’s response .

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court May 20 2021

05/20/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0422
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 53 (Friday, March 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 15481]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05780]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #17372 and #17373; ALASKA Disaster Number AK-
00049]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Alaska

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of ALASKA (FEMA-4646-
DR), dated 03/14/2022.
    Incident: Severe Winter Storm and Straight-line Winds.
    Incident Period: 01/01/2022 through 01/04/2022.

DATES: Issued on 03/14/2022.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/13/2022.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/14/2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 03/14/2022, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Areas: Matanuska-Susitna Borough.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      1.875
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      1.875
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      1.875
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17372 B 
and for economic injury is 17373 0.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Barbara Carson,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2022-05780 Filed 3-17-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
Exhibit 23.1
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  (1)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-141401) pertaining to the 1999 Share Option and
Incentive Plan, 2001 Share Option and Incentive Plan, 2003 Share Option and Incentive Plan,
2004 Share Option and Incentive Sub-Plan for Israeli Employees, 2007 Equity Incentive Plan,
and Employee Stock Purchase Plan of BigBand Networks, Inc., and
 (2)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-153100) pertaining to the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan
and Employee Stock Purchase Plan of BigBand Networks, Inc.;
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Certification of Chief Financial Officer

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pure Bioscience (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary Brownell, Chief Financial Officer certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

March 12, 2004                   /s/ Gary Brownell
-------------------              -----------------------------------
                                 Gary Brownell
                                 Chief Executive Officer
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

May 28, 2015

Hon. Giselle Horton

Assistant Travis County Attorney

PO Box 1748

Austin, TX 78767-1748

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. David A. Escamilla

County Attorney

Travis County Courthouse

P. O. Box 1748

Austin, TX 78767-1748

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Ariel Payan

The Law Offices of Ariel Payan

1012 Rio Grande

Austin, TX 78701

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-14-00090-CR

Tr.Ct.No. C1CR-11-221292

Style: Jason Harding v. The State of Texas

The above-referenced cause has been set for submission without oral argument 

on Thursday, June 18, 2015, before a panel consisting of Chief Justice Rogelio Valdez, 

Justice Gina M. Benavides and Justice Gregory T. Perkes. 

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 143

Commending C. Abbott Saffold (Abby) for her long, faithful, and exemplary

service to the United States Senate.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 29 (legislative day, JUNE 19), 1995

Mr. DASCHLE (for himself, Mr. DOLE, Mr. FORD, Mr. LOTT, Mr. BYRD, Mr.

THURMOND, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. ASHCROFT, Mr. BAUCUS,

Mr. BENNETT, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. BOND, Mrs. BOXER, Mr.

BRADLEY, Mr. BREAUX, Mr. BROWN, Mr. BRYAN, Mr. BUMPERS, Mr.

BURNS, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. CHAFEE, Mr. COATS, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr.

COHEN, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. COVERDELL, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. D’AMATO, Mr.

DEWINE, Mr. DODD, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. EXON, Mr.

FAIRCLOTH, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. FRIST, Mr. GLENN,

Mr. GORTON, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. GRAMM, Mr. GRAMS, Mr. GRASSLEY,

Mr. GREGG, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. HATCH, Mr. HATFIELD, Mr. HEFLIN, Mr.

HELMS, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. INOUYE,

Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. JOHNSTON, Mrs. KASSEBAUM, Mr. KEMPTHORNE,

Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. KERREY, Mr. KERRY, Mr. KOHL, Mr. KYL, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. LUGAR, Mr.

MACK, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. MCCONNELL, Ms. MIKULSKI, Ms. MOSELEYBRAUN, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. NICKLES,

Mr. NUNN, Mr. PACKWOOD, Mr. PELL, Mr. PRESSLER, Mr. PRYOR, Mr.

REID, Mr. ROBB, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. ROTH, Mr. SANTORUM, Mr.

SARBANES, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. SIMON, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. SMITH, Ms.

SNOWE, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. THOMPSON, Mr.

WARNER, and Mr. WELLSTONE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Commending C. Abbott Saffold (Abby) for her long, faithful,

and exemplary service to the United States Senate.
2

SRES 143 ATS

Whereas Abby Saffold has faithfully served the Congress in

many capacities over the past twenty-eight years, twentyfive of which were spent in service to the Senate;

Whereas Abby Saffold was the first woman in the history of

the Senate to serve as Secretary for the majority and the

first to serve as Secretary for the minority;

Whereas Abby Saffold has at all times discharged the important duties and responsibilities of her office with great efficiency and diligence; and

Whereas her dedication, good humor, and exceptional service

have earned her the respect and affection of Democratic

and Republican Senators as well as their staffs: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate expresses its appreciation

2 to Abby Saffold and commends her for her lengthy, faith3 ful, and outstanding service to the Senate.

4 SEC. 2. The Secretary of the Senate shall transmit

5 a copy of this resolution to C. Abbott Saffold.

Æ
**Exhibit 12.3**

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Actof 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 ofTitle 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of AerCapHoldings N.V. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’sknowledge, that:

TheAnnual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006(the “Form-20-F”) of the Company fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-Ffairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Dated: March 21, 2007  | /s/ KLAUS  HEINEMANN      |
|------------------------|---------------------------|
|                   | Klaus Heinemann           |
|                   | *Chief Executive Officer* |
| Dated: March 21,  2007 | /s/ KEITH HELMING         |
|                   | Keith Helming             |
|                   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1989

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,

Petitioner,

v.

MCELROY COAL COMPANY,

Respondent.

On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor 

Relations Board. (6-CA-35806)

Submitted: January 27, 2011 Decided: February 18, 2011

Before DUNCAN and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Petition for enforcement granted by unpublished per curiam 

opinion.

Lafe E. Solomon, Acting General Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., 

Deputy General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General 

Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, 

Julie B. Broido, Supervisory Attorney, Amy H. Ginn, NATIONAL 

LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner.

David C. Burton, WILLIAMS MULLEN, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for 

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

The National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) brings 

this action to enforce a Board order against McElroy Coal 

Company. The Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) concluded McElroy 

violated Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act 

(“the Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1) (2006). The Board, by a two 

member group, affirmed the ALJ’s factual determinations and 

legal conclusions that McElroy violated Section 8(a)(1) of the 

Act.

In its previous appeal to this court, the Board filed 

an unopposed motion to remand the case based on the Supreme 

Court’s holding in New Process Steel, L.P. v. NLRB, 130 S. Ct. 

2635 (2010), that the Act does not authorize fewer than three 

members to form a valid delegee group. We granted the petition 

for review, vacated the Board’s order, and remanded to the Board 

for further proceedings. McElroy Coal Co. v. NLRB, 392 F. App’x 

137 (4th Cir. 2010) (Nos. 09-1332, 09-1427).

On remand, the Board, by a three-member panel,

concluded that McElroy violated Section 8(a)(1) of the Act. 

Because substantial evidence supports the Board’s conclusion, we 

grant the petition for enforcement. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION FOR ENFORCEMENT GRANTED
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**Certification
      of Chief Financial Officer**


**Pursuant
      to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**




In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
      December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) of Columbus Acquisition Corp. (the
“Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, I, Michael Sloan, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
      (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Registrant, hereby certify,
      to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




/s/
                Michael SloanName:
                Michael SloanTitle:
                Senior Vice President andChief Financial OfficerDate:
                March 27, 2008
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Josand FARMER, a/k/a Johan Farmer, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-7691

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 30, 2017

Decided: April 4, 2017

Josand Farmer, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Seth Morgan Wood, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Josand Farmer seeks to appeal from the district court’s order denying his motion challenging the enhancement of his sentence under 21 U.S.C. § 851 (2012). We conclude that Farmer’s motion was in substance a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion.

The district court’s order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substan*287tial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2258(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that.Farmer has not made the requisite showing. The district court lacked jurisdiction to deny § 2255 relief on the merits because Farmer’s motion challenged the validity of his sentence and should have been construed as a successive § 2255 motion. *See Gonzalez v. Crosby,*545 U.S. 524, 531-32, 125 S.Ct. 2641, 162 L.Ed.2d 480 (2005); *United States v. Winestock,*340 F.3d 200, 207 (4th Cir. 2003). In the absence of pre-filing authorization from this court, the district court lacked jurisdiction to hear a successive § 2255 motion. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3) (2012).

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabihty and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
# EUR-Lex - 32002Q1010(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32002Q1010(01)

**Amendment to the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice of 17 September 2002 **

*
Official Journal L 272 , 10/10/2002 P. 0024 - 0024 *

Amendment to the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice

of 17 September 2002

THE COURT OF JUSTICE,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 245 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 160 thereof,

Having regard to the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Coal and Steel Community, and in particular Article 55 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 20 of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Communities, as amended by Council Decision 2002/653/EC(1), permits non-member States to take part in preliminary-ruling proceedings before the Court in the event that an agreement relating to a specific subject-matter, concluded with one or more non-member States, provides for such participation where a court or tribunal of a Member State refers to the Court for a preliminary ruling a question falling within the scope of the agreement in question.

(2) It is necessary to lay down the rules applicable to the languages to be used where a non-member State takes part in such proceedings for a preliminary ruling.

With the unanimous approval of the Council given on 12 July 2002,

HEREBY ADOPTS THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS TO ITS RULES OF PROCEDURE:

Article 1

1. The following subparagraph shall be added to Article 29(3): "Non-member States taking part in proceedings for a preliminary ruling pursuant to the final paragraph of Article 20 of the EC Statute may be authorised to use one of the languages mentioned in paragraph 1 of this Article other than the language of the case. This provision shall apply both to written documents and to oral statements. The Registrar shall in each case arrange for their translation into the language of the case."

2. The following subparagraph shall be added to Article 104(1): "Where a non-member State has the right to take part in proceedings for a preliminary ruling pursuant to Article 20 of the EC Statute, the original version of the decision of the national court or tribunal shall be communicated to it together with a translation into one of the languages mentioned in Article 29(1), to be chosen by the non-member State concerned."

Article 2

These amendments to the Rules of Procedure, which are authentic in the languages referred to in Article 29(1), shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities and shall enter into force on the day of their publication.

Done at Luxembourg on 17 September 2002.

(1) OJ L 218, 13.8.2002, p. 1.