alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF PENSKE MOTORSPORTS, INC. AS
OF MARCH 31, 1998 AND THE RELATED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR
THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,018
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,533
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,452
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,588
<PP&E>                                         254,817
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 307,658
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,643
<BONDS>                                         50,736
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           142
<OTHER-SE>                                     188,904
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   307,658
<SALES>                                          3,946
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,137
<CGS>                                            2,462
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,579
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,620)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 859
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,681)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,033)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,648)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,648)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)
        

</TABLE>
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 01909

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

01909\01909_ Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

01909\01909_ Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

01909\01909_ HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 01909\01909_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

x 01909\01909_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01909\01909_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01909\01909_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01909\01909_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01909\01909_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01909\Supporting Documents\01909_ A5-2 Map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01909\Supporting Documents\01909_ A5-3 WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01909\Supporting Documents\01909_ D3-1 Pond-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

01909\Supporting Documents\01909_ Submittal Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
SCWC

- 18

- 0000717

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI  I

AOAO QUEEN EMMA GARDENS and TOUCHSTONE PROPERTIES, LTD.,

Respondents/Respondents

- Appellants/Cross

- Appellees/Appellees,

vs.

TOMMY WAI HUNG MA and SINDY YEE MA,

Petitioners/Petitioners

- Appellees/Cross

- Appellants/Appellants,

and

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CONDOMINIUM DISPUTE RESOLUTION

PILOT PROGRAM, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS,

STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I,

Respondent/Agency

- Appellee/Cross

- Appellee/Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP

- 18

- 0000717; CIV. NO. 1CC171001914)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, and Devens, JJ.,

and Circuit Judge Park, in place of Ginoza, J., recused)

Petitioners’ Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed

on January 17, 2024, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, March 11 , 2024.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. Mckenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Vladimir P. Devens

/s/ Shanlyn A. Park Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-18-0000717

11-MAR-2024

01:42 PM

Dkt. 33 ODAC
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from the Form 10-QSB and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1997
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,492
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,978
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     29,624
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             500
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               500
<LOANS>                                        222,475
<ALLOWANCE>                                        527
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 271,614
<DEPOSITS>                                     199,786
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,820
<LONG-TERM>                                     27,242
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            28
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,738
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 271,614
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,296
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  527
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,823
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,412
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,768
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,055
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       75
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,686
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    687
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         687
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       420
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.14
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    .032
<LOANS-NON>                                        300
<LOANS-PAST>                                       312
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   351
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   512
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  527
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               527
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            505
        


</TABLE>
|   | 1. | Such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of A5 Laboratories Inc. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 5, 2011 | /s/ Richard Azani           |   |
|-------------------|-----------------------------|--------|
|              | Richard Azani               |   |
|              | Principal Executive Officer |   |

----
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 02, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 02, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22I0059. DWIGHT LLEYWILLN NAILS v. THE STATE.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: SUCR2018000208
EX-35 (b)
GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC.

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

MSM 2006-17XS

I, Michael De Francesco, an authorized officer of GreenPoint Mortgage Funding,
Inc. (the "Servicer"), certify that:

1. A review of the Servicer's activities during the period from and including
January 1, 2006 through and including December 31, 2006 (or applicable
portion thereof) and of the Servicer's performance under the applicable
servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement
in all material respects throughout such period.

Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to
them in the Agreement.


Date: February 28, 2007




/s/ Michael De Francesco
Michael De Francesco
Senior Vice President, Loan Administration
#### Ossie Lee SLAUGHTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jeffrey A. UTTECHT, Warden; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-35947

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed December 26, 2017

*387Ossie Lee Slaughter, Pro Se

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Ossie Lee Slaughter, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to pay the filing fee after denying Slaughter’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s interpretation and application of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). *Harris v. Mangum,*863 F.3d 1133, 1138 (9th Cir. 2017). We affirm.

The district court properly denied Slaughter’s motion to proceed IFP because at the time Slaughter filed the complaint, Slaughter had filed three actions or appeals that qualified as “strikes,” and Slaughter did not plausibly allege that he was “under imminent danger of serious physical injury” at the time he lodged the complaint | or the appeal. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g);' *Harris,*863 F.3d at 1143 (“[W]hen (1) a district court dismisses a complaint on the ground that it fails to state a claim, (2) the court grants leave to amend, and (3) the plaintiff then fails to file an amended complaint, the dismissal counts as a strike under § 1915(g).”); *Richey v. Dahne,*807 F.3d 1202, 1208 (9th Cir. 2015) (appellate court’s denial of IFP because the appeal is frivolous counts as a “strike” even though the court does not dismiss the appeal until later, after appellant fails to pay the filing fee).

We reject as meritless Slaughter’s contentions of judicial misconduct or bias.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wayne LEWIS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-7047

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 11, 2017

Decided: January 19, 2018

Wayne L. Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Erik Sean Siebert, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Wayne L. Lewis seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds,- the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lewis has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
EXHIBIT 32.1

                 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

     The undersigned executive officer of First Federal Bancshares of Arkansas,
Inc. (the "Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-Q for
the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



                                   /s/Larry J. Brandt
                                   _____________________________________
                                   Larry J. Brandt
                                   President/Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 3, 2003
Directorate Identifier: 2010-NM-171-AD

REGULATORY EVALUATION

I

I

Costs:

Labor per airplane (19 work hour(s) x $85/hour)

Parts per airplane

Cost per airplane

Number of u.S.-registered airplanes

Total fleet cost

$

$

$

1,615

-l1

1,615

J

Executive Order] 2866:

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of

transpo11ation?

YES () explain NO (X)
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 15-1616

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Charles Wesley Williams lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City

____________ Submitted: October 5, 2015 Filed: October 14, 2015 [Unpublished]

____________ Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. At a supervised-release revocation hearing, Charles Williams admitted to the district court 1 that he had violated several of his release conditions while serving a 1 The Honorable Beth Phillips, United Stat es District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.period of supervised release on a federa l criminal sentence. The court revoked supervised release and imposed a revocation sentence of 21 months in prison--the bottom of the Chapter 7 revocation range--and 1 year of additional supervised release. On appeal, Williams contends that the se ntence is substantively unreasonable because it is greater than necessary to comply with the purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). After careful review, we conclude that the c ourt did not abuse its discretion. See United States v. Miller , 557 F.3d 910, 915-16 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review). The judgment is affirmed, and we grant counsel leave to withdraw.

______________________________

-2-
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:? U.S. DOT/FAA - Regulatory Evaluation Form ? U.S. DOT/FAA - Unscannable Items List ? U.S. DOT/FAA - Final rule; request for comments ? U.S. DOT/FAA - Final rule; request for comments grid
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6542

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAVIER GUILLEN ISLAS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:19-cr-00079-RJC-DCK-1)

Submitted: September 8, 2022 Decided: September 13, 2022

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Javier Guillen Islas, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6542 Doc: 6 Filed: 09/13/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Javier Guillen Islas appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a 

sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have reviewed the record and discern 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. 

Islas, No. 3:19-cr-00079-RJC-DCK-1 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 19, 2022). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6542 Doc: 6 Filed: 09/13/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
# Official Journal C 146/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 146 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 634 May 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 146

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 634 May 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 146/01 | Euro exchange rates — 30 April 2020 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 146/01

Euro exchange rates — 30 April 2020

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15** 
**- 1222** 

SARA CAPELLI , Appellant ,

v.

STEPHEN GREGORY CAPELLI, JR. ,
Debtor

– Appellee ,
and

THOMAS HERBERT FLUHARTY ,

Trustee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Elkins

. John Preston Bailey , District Judge. ( 2:14

- cv
- 00087

- JPB )

Submitted : July 30, 2015 Decided: August 10, 2015

Before MOTZ and GREGORY , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Sara Capelli , Appellant Pro Se

. Todd Bradley Johnson , JOHNSON LAW, PLLC, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Sara Capelli appeals the district court ’ s order affirming
the bankruptcy court’s order overruling her objections to the
exemptions claimed by the debtor in the underlying bankruptcy
proceeding . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Capelli v. Capelli , No. 2:14

- cv
- 00087

- JPB (N.D.

W. Va. Jan. 29, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before th is court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,641,651
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  968,020
<ALLOWANCES>                                       118
<INVENTORY>                                  1,230,385
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,038,519
<PP&E>                                       4,076,949
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,128,817
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,364,744
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          945,641
<BONDS>                                      3,199,756
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    13,971,547
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,752,200)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,364,744
<SALES>                                      2,317,517
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,317,517
<CGS>                                        1,815,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,131,544
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             261,624
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,815,623)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       150
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,815,773)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.62)
        






</TABLE>
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 308

Notifying the President of the United States of the election of Gary Lee

Sisco of Tennessee as Secretary of the Senate.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 1, 1996

Mr. LOTT submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed

to

RESOLUTION

Notifying the President of the United States of the election

of Gary Lee Sisco of Tennessee as Secretary of the Senate.

1 Resolved, That the President of the United States be

2 notified of the election of Gary Lee Sisco of Tennessee

3 as Secretary of the Senate.

Æ