alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Important legal notice**

*|*

# 12004V388

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VI — THE FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - CHAPTER I — PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS - Section 2 — The Union's advisory bodies - Subsection 1 — The Committee of the Regions - Article III-388***Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0167 - 0168*

Article III-388

The Committee of the Regions shall be consulted by the European Parliament, by the Council or by the Commission where the Constitution so provides and in all other cases in which one of these institutions considers it appropriate, in particular those which concern cross-border cooperation.

The European Parliament, the Council or the Commission shall, if it considers it necessary, set the Committee, for the submission of its opinion, a time-limit which shall not be less than one month from the date on which the chairman receives notification to this effect. Upon expiry of the time-limit, the absence of an opinion shall not prevent further action.

Where the Economic and Social Committee is consulted, the Committee of the Regions shall be informed by the European Parliament, the Council or the Commission of the request for an opinion. Where it considers that specific regional interests are involved, the Committee of the Regions may issue an opinion on the matter. It may also issue an opinion on its own initiative.

The opinion of the Committee, together with a record of its proceedings, shall be forwarded to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the Commission.

--------------------------------------------------
NUMBER 13-23-00295-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

 

CAROLINA SANCHEZ AND 

ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS, Appellants,

v.

A. JIMENEZ D/B/A LULAC VILLAGE APT., Appellee.

 

ON APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 5

OF NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Peña

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria

On January 18, 2024, appellant Carolina Sanchez “and all other occupants” filed 

a pro se notice of appeal from a judgment of eviction. On January 9, 2024, the Clerk of 

this Court advised appellants by certified letter that the appellants’ brief was due on 

December 15, 2023, that the brief had not been timely filed, and that the appeal would be 
2

dismissed unless, within ten days, appellants explained the failure to file the brief and the 

appellee would not be significantly injured by a late filing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 

42.3(b), (c). Because it appeared that appellants failed to receive this certified letter, on 

February 16, 2024, the Clerk advised appellants by email and regular mail that the brief 

had not been filed and that the appeal would be dismissed unless, within ten days, 

appellants explained the failure and the appellee would not be significantly injured by their

failure to timely file a brief. See id. Appellants neither responded to the Clerk’s directives 

nor filed the brief.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the foregoing sequence of 

events, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. See 

id. R. 38.8(a); Nevarez v. Elguea, 181 S.W.3d 540, 541 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2005, no 

pet.). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P.

38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c).

NORA L. LONGORIA

Justice

Delivered and filed on the

21st day of March, 2024.
EXHIBIT 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Giggles N’ Hugs, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tracie Hadama, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: April 15, 2011


/s/ Tracie Hadama
 Tracie Hadama
 Chief Executive Officer and
 Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 11

                         CATSKILL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
                 (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)


                                                Three Months Ended December 31,
                                                -------------------------------

                                                   1997                 1996
                                                ----------          ----------

NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE - BASIC

   Net income applicable to common shares       $      958          $    1,066

   Weighted average common shares outstanding    4,250,413           5,090,814

   Net income per common share - basic          $      .23          $      .21
                                                ==========          ==========

NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE - DILUTED

   Net income applicable to common shares       $      958          $    1,066

   Weighted average common shares outstanding    4,250,413           5,090,814

   Dilutive common stock options (1)               143,426              19,548
                                                ----------          ----------

   Weighted average common shares and
     common share equivalents outstanding        4,393,839           5,110,362
                                                ==========          ==========

   Net income per common share - diluted        $      .22          $      .21
                                                ==========          ==========


(1) Dilutive common stock options (includes restricted stock under the Company's
MRP plan and  options  under its stock  option  plan) are based on the  treasury
stock method using average market price.  The treasury  stock method  recognizes
the use of assumed  proceeds  upon the  exercise of  options,  and the amount of
unearned  compensation   attributed  to  future  services  under  the  Company's
restricted stock plan, including any tax benefits,  will be used to purchase the
Company's common stock at the average market price during the period.



                                       20
Exhibit







Exhibit 10.29



AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO THE GLOBAL EAGLE ENTERTAINMENT INC.
 AMENDED AND RESTATED 2013 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


Adopted December 5, 2016


WHEREAS, Global Eagle Entertainment Inc. (the "Company") has established and maintains the Global Eagle Ente1tainment Inc. Amended and Restated 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan"); and


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 12 of the Plan, the Committee (as defined in the Plan) has the power to amend the Plan.


NOW, THEREFORE, the Committee hereby amends the Plan as follows:


1.Amendment. Section 12(e) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:


"(e) Repricing, Buybacks and Backdating Prohibited. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, and except for the adjustments provided in Section 14, neither the Committee nor any other Person may decrease the exercise price for any outstanding Option after the date of grant nor cancel, repurchase or replace an outstanding underwater Option in exchange for cash, other Awards, new Options with a lower exercise price or any other cash or equity incentive awards. In addition, the Committee may not make a grant of an Option with a grant date that is effective prior to the date the Committee takes action to approve such Award."


2.No Other Changes. Except as specifically amended hereby, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects and remains in full force and effect.




(Remainder of page intentionally left blank.)








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment No. 1 to the Plan to be executed by the undersigned.


	
			
	 
	GLOBAL EAGLE ENTERTAINMENT INC.

	 
	 
	 

	 
	By:
	/s/ Stephen Ballas

	 
	 
	 

	 
	Name:
	Stephen Ballas

	 
	 
	 

	 
	Title:
	Executive Vice President and General Counsel
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David AMEZQUITA-FRANCO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-7079

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 30, 2018

Decided: February 1, 2018

David Amezquita-Franco, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen David Schiller, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Amezquita-Franco seeks to appeal the district court’s August 2016 order dismissing as successive and unauthorized his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Amezquita-Franco filed his notice of appeal well beyond the 60-day appeal period, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), and the appeal itself is duplicative of a prior appeal of the same order, *United States v. Amezquita-Franco,*675 Fed.Appx. 335 (4th Cir. 2017) (No. 16-7111) (denying certificate of ap-pealability and dismissing appeal). Therefore, we dismiss the appeal as untimely and duplicative. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
EX-35 (b)
(logo) FIRST REPUBLIC BANK
It's a privilege to serve you

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
Attention: Servicer Oversight Group

RE: Officer's Certificate

Dear Master Servicer:

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the 2006 fiscal year:


THORNBURG 2006-6


(i) a review of the Correspondent's activities during the immediately preceding
calendar year (or applicable portion thereof) and of its performance under the
Agreement and any applicable Reconstitution Agreement during such period has
been made under such officer's supervision, and

(ii) to the best of such officers' knowledge, based on such review, the
Correspondent has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement and any
applicable Reconstitution Agreement in all material respects throughout such
calendar year (or applicable portion thereof) or, if there has been a failure to
fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, specifically identifying
each such failure known to such officer and the nature and the status thereof.

Certified By:/s/ Nancy Segreto
Nancy Segreto
Officer
Senior Vice President
Title
Date February 22,2007


San Francisco Los Angeles Santa Barbara Newport Beach San Diego Las Vegas
New York
8310 W. SAHARA AVENUE, LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89117, TEL (702) 792-5288 OR (888) 216-
6888, FAX (702) 792-2203
CONVENIENT INTERNET BANKING AT www.firstrepublic.com * NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE
SYMBOL: FRC * MEMBER FDIC
Directorate Identifier: 2010-NM-171-AD REGULATORY EVALUATION



# I I Costs: Labor per airplane (19 work hour(s) x $85/hour) Parts per airplane Cost per airplane Number ofu.S.-registered airplanes Total fleet cost $ $ $ 1,615



## -l1 1,615 

## J

Executive Order] 2866: Could theAD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Isthe AD significant? YES () explain NO (X)

YES () explain NO (X) Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on asubstantial number of small entities? YES () explain NO (X) Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation inAlaska. Is itappropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated inAlaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transpo11ation? YES () explain NO (X)
#### In the MATTER OF : Darlene HAYNES Debtor Green Tree Servicing, L.L.C.; Walter Investment Management Corporation; Best Insurors, Incorporated; Mid State Capital, L.L.C.; Mid State Trust II; Mid State Trust III; Mid State Trust IV; Mid State Trust V; Mid State Trust VI; Mid State Trust VII; Mid State Trust VIII; Mid State Trust IX; Mid State Trust X; Mid State Trust XI; Wilmington Trust Company; Mid-State Capital Corporation 2004-1 Trust; Mid-State Capital Corporation 2005-1 Trust; Mid-State Capital Corporation 2006-1 Trust; Mid-State Capital Trust 2010-1, Appellees *388v. Darlene Haynes, Appellant

No. 17-60113 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed November 27, 2017

Kaytie Michelle Pickett, Esq., Andrew Scott Harris, Adam Stone, Jones Walker, L.L.P., Jackson, MS, for Appellees

Mitchell Dee Thomas, Esq., Logan & Mayo, P.A., Newton, MS, Peter Emmanuel Ferraro, Ferraro Law Firm, Austin, TX, Jeffery P. Reynolds, Esq., Senior Attorney, Jeffery P. Reynolds, P.A., Jackson, MS, for Appellant

Before WIENER, SOUTHWICK, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

There are two separate but related lawsuits that are relevant in this appeal. The first is the underlying suit brought by Appellant Darlene Haynes against the Ap-pellees and other entities and individuals. The second is a separate action filed by the Appellees to compel Haynes to arbitrate the claims she brought against them in the underlying lawsuit.

The United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi entered a final judgment in the second lawsuit, compelling Haynes to arbitrate her claims against the Appellees and staying the proceedings between the parties in the underlying lawsuit. Haynes appealed.

We recently held that we lacked appellate jurisdiction over a district court’s order that compelled arbitration and then stayed the proceedings in the separate lawsuit between the parties. *See Green Tree Servicing, L.L.C. v. Charles,*872 F.3d 637, 638-40 (5th Cir. 2017). We find no meaningful distinction between this case and our recent decision.

We do not have jurisdiction over the district court’s final judgment compelling arbitration because that judgment also stayed the substantive claims in the underlying lawsuit between Haynes and the Ap-pellees. *See id.*at 639-40. The appeal is DISMISSED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
-----"Gaerlan, Joan" <JGaerlan@ci.glendale.ca.us> wrote: ----- 

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Gaerlan, Joan" <JGaerlan@ci.glendale.ca.us> 

Date: 07/07/2010 05:49PM 

cc: "Cruz, Nicolas" <NCruz@ci.glendale.ca.us> 

Subject: Request for Extension of EPA Questionnaire for Plant ID 02827 

Dear Ms. Alicea,

On behalf of City of Glendale Water and Power, please find the attached pdf file as our request for 

extension of EPA questionnaire for Grayson Power Plant (Plant ID 02827). A hard copy of this letter has 

been sent to your attention via snail mail today. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not 

hesitate to contact Mr. Nick Cruz at 818.548.3399.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely, 

Joan Antonette V. Gaerlan

Mechanical Engineering Assistant

Glendale Water & Power - Power Management 

Tel. 818.548.2828

Fax. 818.548.3377

JGaerlan@ci.glendale.ca.us

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C36F777DO... 8/17/2011
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

In the Interest of H.M.-T., a child.

S.T.,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and

GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM,

Appellees.

No. 2D2024-0170

June 5, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Lisa D. 

Campbell, Judge.

Jonathan E. Hackworth of Hackworth Law, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Andrew Feigenbaum of Children's Legal Services, West Palm Beach, for 

Appellee Department of Children and Families.

Douglas J. Glaid of Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Defending Best 

Interests Project, Fort Lauderdale; and Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, 

Statewide Director of Appeals, and Sarah Todd Weitz, Senior Attorney, 

Statewide Guardian Ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for Appellee Guardian 

ad Litem.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
2

SILBERMAN, LaROSE, and SMITH, JJ., Concur. 

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
#### Gale Lawrence WEBB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF TEMPE, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-15749

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted November 15, 2017*

Filed November 20, 2017

Gale Lawrence Webb, Pro Se

Michael Robert Niederbaumer, Tempe City Attorney’s Office, Tempe, ÁZ, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Gale Lawrence Webb appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a district court’s dismissal for failure to join a required party, and review de novo the legal conclusions underlying that determination. *Ward v. Apple Inc.,*791 F.3d 1041, 1047 (9th Cir. 2015). We affirm,

The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Webb’s action for failure to join the State of Arizona because the State is a required party and subject to sovereign immunity. *See*Fed. R. Civ. P, 19 (setting forth factors relevant to joinder of a required party); *Salt River Project Agric. Improvement & Power Dist. v. Lee,*672 F.3d 1176, 1179 (9th Cir. 2012) (describing bases for concluding a party is required to join (citing Rule 19(a))); *Paiute-Shoshone Indians of Bishop Cmty. of Bishop Colony, Cal. v. City of Los Angeles,*637 F.3d 993, 1000 (9th Cir. 2011) (“Rule 19(b) requires ... a practical examination of the circumstances to determine whether *540an action may proceed in equity and good conscience without the absent party.” (citation, internal quotation marks, and alteration omitted)).

We reject as unsupported by the record Webb’s contention that the district court violated due process by ruling on defendant’s motion to dismiss prior to holding a case management conference.

Webb’s request to submit this case on the briefs (Docket Entry No. 7) is granted,

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 234 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 234

               Relative to the death of Edmund S. Muskie

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

              March 27, (legislative day, March 26), 1996

Mr. Daschle (for himself, Mr. Dole, Mr. Cohen and Ms. Snowe ) submitted 
      the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
               Relative to the death of Edmund S. Muskie

Whereas, the Senate fondly remembers former Secretary of State former Governor 
        of Maine, and former Senator from Maine, Edmund S. Muskie;
Whereas, Edmund S. Muskie spent six years in the Maine House of Representatives, 
        becoming minority leader;
Whereas, in 1954, voters made Edmund S. Muskie the State's first Democratic 
        Governor in 20 years;
Whereas, after a second two-year term, he went on in 1958 to become the first 
        popularly elected Democratic Senator in Maine's history;
Whereas, Edmund S. Muskie in 1968, was chosen as Democratic Vice-Presidential 
        nominee;
Whereas, Edmund S. Muskie left the Senate to become President Carter's Secretary 
        of State;
Whereas, Edmund S. Muskie served with honor and distinction in each of these 
        capacities: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate has heard with profound sorrow and deep 
regret the announcement of the death of the Honorable Edmund S. Muskie, 
formerly a Senator from the State of Maine.
    Resolved, That the Secretary communicate these resolutions to the 
House of Representatives and transmit an enrolled copy thereof to the 
family of the deceased.
    Resolved, That when the Senate adjourn today, it adjourn as a 
further mark of respect to the memory of the deceased Senator
                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal L 235/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.235.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 235 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 525 September 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.235.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 235

English edition

Legislation

Volume 525 September 2009

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 790/2009 of 10 August 2009 amending, for the purposes of its adaptation to technical and scientific progress, Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (1) | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 790/2009 of 10 August 2009 amending, for the purposes of its adaptation to technical and scientific progress, Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 130 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 130

Providing for notification to the President of the United States of the 
                election of the Secretary of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 June 8 (legislative day, June 5), 1995

 Mr. Nickles (for Mr. Dole) submitted the following resolution; which 
                      was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for notification to the President of the United States of the 
                election of the Secretary of the Senate.
    Resolved, That the President of the United States be notified of 
the election of the Honorable Kelly D. Johnston, of Oklahoma, as 
Secretary of the Senate.
                                 <all>
```