alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6428 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6428

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to limit Medicare part 
                     B premium increases for 2017.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 2, 2016

    Ms. Titus (for herself, Mr. Bera, Ms. Hanabusa, Ms. Matsui, Mr. 
   Peterson, Mr. Pocan, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Courtney, Mr. O'Rourke, Mr. 
   Yarmuth, Ms. Schakowsky, Mrs. Lowey, Ms. Kuster, Ms. DelBene, Ms. 
 McCollum, Ms. Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico, Mr. Keating, Mr. 
Bishop of Georgia, Mr. Nolan, Mrs. Dingell, Ms. Edwards, Ms. Frankel of 
    Florida, Mr. Garamendi, Mr. Deutch, Mrs. Bustos, Mr. Cohen, Ms. 
Slaughter, Ms. Moore, Ms. Castor of Florida, Ms. Pingree, Ms. Wasserman 
   Schultz, Mr. Nadler, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. McGovern, and Ms. Bonamici) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
   Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and 
 Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to limit Medicare part 
                     B premium increases for 2017.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITING MEDICARE PART B PREMIUM INCREASES FOR 2017.

    (a) In General.--Section 1839(a) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395r(a)) is amended--
            (1) in the second sentence of paragraph (1), by striking 
        ``paragraphs (5) and (6)'' and inserting ``paragraphs (5), (6), 
        and (7)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(7)(A) In applying this part (including subsection (i) and 
section 1833(b)), subject to subparagraph (B), the monthly premium 
otherwise determined under this section for an individual for 2017 
shall not be increased by more than $4 from the monthly premium 
determined under this section for the individual for 2016.
    ``(B) Nothing in subparagraph (A) shall affect the application of 
paragraph (6) with respect to a repayment month described in 
subparagraph (B) of such paragraph.''.
    (b) Conforming Funding.--Section 1844(d)(1) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w(d)(1)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``and 2017'' after ``2016'';
            (2) by striking ``such year'' and inserting ``such 
        respective year''; and
            (3) by striking ``section 1839(a)(5)(A)'' and inserting 
        ``paragraph (5)(A) of section 1839(a) or (7)(A) of such 
        section, respectively,''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 23-11029-C

________________________ PETER GEORGACARAKOS, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN-MEDIUM, Respondent-Appellee.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ Before: WILSON, ROSENBAUM, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: This appeal is DISMISSED IN PART, sua sponte , for lack of jurisdiction because Peter Georgacarakos’s notice of appeal, deemed file d on March 24, 2023, was untimely to appeal from the district court’s September 1, 2022 order and September 2, 2022 judg ment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for a writ of habeas corpus wit hout prejudice. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin. , 606 F.3d 1296, 1300-02 (11th Cir. 2010); Fe d. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), (c)(1); Jeffries v. United States , 748 F.3d 1310, 1314 (11th Cir. 2014). Furthe rmore, while Georgacarakos’s first motion for reconsideration tolled the period to appeal from the September 2, 2022 judgment, his second motion for reconsideration did not because it was filed mo re than 28 days after that judgment and raised s ubstantially similar challenges to the order dismissing his petition as his first motion for reconsideration. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(A) ; Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e); Wansor USCA11 Case: 23-11029 Document: 5-2 Date Filed: 08/03/2023 Page: 1 of 22 v. George Hantscho Co. , 570 F.2d 1202, 1206, n.5 (5th Cir. 1978); Wright v. Preferred Research, Inc. , 891 F.2d 886, 889 (11th Cir. 1990). However, Georgacarakos’s March 24, 2023 notice of appeal was timely to appeal from the district court’s Marc h 21, 2023 order denying his second motion for reconsideration, and, be cause his second motion for recons ideration tolled the time to appeal the court’s denial of his first motion for r econsideration, his notice of appeal is also timely as to the court’s October 17, 2022 order denying his first mo tion for reconsideration. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), (a)(4)(A); Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e); Williams v. Bolger , 633 F.2d 410, 413 (5th Cir. 1980). Accordingly, Georgacarakos’s appeal is dismi ssed to the extent he challenges the district court’s order and judgment dismis sing his § 2241 petition and may pr oceed only as to his challenge to the district court’s October 17, 2022 and Marc h 21, 2023 orders. No motion for reconsideration may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 27-2 and all other applicable rules. USCA11 Case: 23-11029 Document: 5-2 Date Filed: 08/03/2023 Page: 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6471 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6471

 To expand retroactive eligibility of the Army Combat Action Badge to 
  include members of the Army who participated in combat during which 
 they personally engaged, or were personally engaged by, the enemy at 
                 any time on or after December 7, 1941.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 7, 2016

 Mr. Mooney of West Virginia introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To expand retroactive eligibility of the Army Combat Action Badge to 
  include members of the Army who participated in combat during which 
 they personally engaged, or were personally engaged by, the enemy at 
                 any time on or after December 7, 1941.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Army Combat Action Badge Eligibility 
Act''.

SEC. 2. RETROACTIVE AWARD OF ARMY COMBAT ACTION BADGE.

    (a) Authority To Award.--The Secretary of the Army may award the 
Army Combat Action Badge to a person who, as determined by the 
Secretary--
            (1) participated as a member of the Army at any time during 
        the eligibility period in combat during which the person 
        personally engaged, or was personally engaged by, the enemy; 
        and
            (2) has not been previously recognized in an appropriate 
        manner for the member's participation in such combat.
    (b) Procurement of Badge.--The Secretary of the Army may make 
arrangements with suppliers of the Army Combat Action Badge so that 
persons eligible to receive the Army Combat Action Badge pursuant to 
subsection (a) may procure the badge directly from suppliers, thereby 
eliminating, or at least substantially reducing, administrative costs 
for the Army to carry out this section.
    (c) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Army combat action badge.--The term ``Army Combat 
        Action Badge'' means the military decoration established by 
        order of the Secretary of the Army through Headquarters, 
        Department of the Army Letter 600-05-1, dated June 3, 2005.
            (2) Eligibility period.--The term ``eligibility period'' 
        means the period beginning on December 7, 1941, and ending on 
        September 18, 2001 (the date of the otherwise applicable 
        limitation on the retroactive award of the Army Combat Action 
        Badge).
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 696 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 696

 To amend part B of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to exclude 
 customary prompt pay discounts from manufacturers to wholesalers from 
 the average sales price for drugs and biologicals under Medicare, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 2015

 Mr. Whitfield (for himself, Mr. Gene Green of Texas, Mr. Shimkus, Ms. 
  DeGette, Mr. Nunes, and Mr. Tiberi) introduced the following bill; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in 
    addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend part B of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to exclude 
 customary prompt pay discounts from manufacturers to wholesalers from 
 the average sales price for drugs and biologicals under Medicare, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCLUDING CUSTOMARY PROMPT PAY DISCOUNTS FROM MANUFACTURERS 
              TO WHOLESALERS FROM THE AVERAGE SALES PRICE FOR MEDICARE 
              PAYMENTS FOR DRUGS AND BIOLOGICALS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1847A(c)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395w-3a(c)(3)) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence, by inserting ``(other than 
        customary prompt pay discounts extended to wholesalers)'' after 
        ``prompt pay discounts''; and
            (2) in the second sentence, by inserting ``(other than 
        customary prompt pay discounts extended to wholesalers)'' after 
        ``other price concessions''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to the calculation of the average sales price for calendar 
quarters beginning more than 90 days after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
      32.2









CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In
      connection with the Annual Report of 310 Holdings, Inc (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nicole
      Wright, Chief
      Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001,
      that:




The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
              June
              20, 2007
            ****/s/ Nicole
              WrightNicole
              WrightChief
              Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 153 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 153

    To make certain technical corrections to Senate Resolution 120.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 17 (legislative day, July 10), 1995

    Mr. Dole (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    To make certain technical corrections to Senate Resolution 120.
    Resolved, That Senate Resolution 120, agreed to May 17, 1995 (104th 
Congress, 1st Session), is amended--
            (1) in section 2(a)(1)(A) by inserting ``, except that 
        Senator Frank H. Murkowski shall substitute for Senator Phil 
        Gramm'' before the semicolon;
            (2) in section 5(b)--
                    (A) in paragraph (11) by inserting ``with the 
                approval of the Committee on Rules and Administration'' 
                before the period; and
                    (B) in paragraph (12) by inserting ``and the 
                Committee on Rules and Administration'' after 
                ``concerned''; and
            (3) in section 8 by adding at the end the following: 
        ``There are authorized such sums as may be necessary for agency 
        contributions related to the compensation of employees of the 
        Special Committee from May 17, 1995, through February 29, 1996, 
        to be paid from the appropriations account for `Expenses of 
        Inquiries and Investigations' of the Senate.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 133 (Thursday, July 11, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 41794]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16637]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9534-2]

Agency Information Collection Activities OMB Responses

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document announces the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) responses to Agency Clearance requests, in compliance with the 
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et. seq.). An agency may not 
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a 
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB 
control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA regulations are listed 
in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Westlund (202) 566-1682, or email 
at westlund.rick@epa.gov and please refer to the appropriate EPA 
Information Collection Request (ICR) Number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

OMB Responses To Agency Clearance Requests

OMB Approvals

    EPA ICR Number 1981.05; Distribution of Offsite Consequence 
Analysis Information under Section 112(r); 40 CFR part 1400; was 
approved on 06/12/2013; OMB Number 2050-0172; expires on 06/30/2016; 
Approved without change.
    EPA ICR Number 1157.10; NSPS for Flexible Vinyl and Urethane 
Coating and Printing; 40 CFR part 60 subparts A and FFF; was approved 
on 06/12/2013; OMB Number 2060-0073; expires on 06/30/2016; Approved 
without change.
    EPA ICR Number 1160.12; NSPS/NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Insulation 
Manufacturing Plants; 40 CFR part 60 subparts A, NNN and PPP; was 
approved on 06/25/2013; OMB Number 2060-0114; expires on 06/30/2016; 
Approved without change.

Short Term Extensions

    EPA ICR Number 0794.12; Notification of Substantial Risk of Injury 
to Health and the Environment under TSCA Sec. 8(e); OMB Number 2070-
0046; OMB granted a short term extension of the expiration date to 09/
30/2013 on 06/20/2013.

John Moses,
Director, Collections Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2013-16637 Filed 7-10-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Exhibit
23.1







CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Delanco Bancorp, Inc. Registration
Statement No. 333-155621 on Form S-8 of our report dated June 7, 2010 relating
to our audit of the consolidated financial statements of Delanco Bancorp, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2010 appearing in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
June 28, 2010.




/s/
Connolly, Grady & Cha, P.C.


Certified
Public Accountants





Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania





August
12, 2010
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed November 29, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-1076

Lower Tribunal No. F14-700

________________

Edward R. Brown,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a) from

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lody Jean, Judge.

Edward R. Brown, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, SCALES and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 622 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 20, 2015 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

permanent the deduction of State and local general sales 

taxes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 622 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State and Local Sales 

3 Tax Deduction Fairness Act of 2015’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF DEDUCTION OF STATE 

5 AND LOCAL GENERAL SALES TAXES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 164(b)(5) of the Internal 

7 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking subpara8 graph (I). 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

11 December 31, 2014. 

12 SEC. 3. BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

13 The budgetary effects of this Act shall not be entered 

14 on either PAYGO scorecard maintained pursuant to sec15 tion 4(d) of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 16, 2015. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SECOND
AMENDMENT TO CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE


This
Second Amendment (this “Amendment”) to that certain Convertible Promissory Note (the “Note”), dated as
of January 11, 2016, by and between SocialPlay USA, Inc. (“Maker”), a company organized and existing under the laws
of the State of Nevada, and CMGT, Inc. (“Holder”), is made effective as of this 28th day of April, 2017
(the “Amendment Effective Date”).


WITNESSETH:


In
consideration of the foregoing and of the promises, agreements, representations, warranties, and covenants herein contained, and
intended to continue to be bound to the Note, as amended by this Amendment, the Parties hereby agree as follows:


1.
Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Note.


2.
Section 2.3(c) of the Note, entitled “Subsequent Sales of Common Stock,” is hereby deleted in its entirety.


3.
All other terms and conditions under the Note not otherwise amended, modified or affected by this Amendment shall continue to
be in effect and bind the Parties. The Note or this Amendment may only be modified with prior written agreement from both Parties.


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed on the last date written below, effective as
of the Amendment Effective Date.


CMGT,
Inc.


 


By:
/s/ Oliver Lindsay


Print
name: Oliver Lindsay


Title: Manager


 


SocialPlay
USA, Inc.


 


By:
/s/ Robert Rosner


Robert
Rosner, CEO
#### James Edward CHANNELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Eric WILSON, Warden, FCC Petersburg Correctional Institution, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-7494

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 15, 2018

Decided: February 20, 2018

James Edward Channell, Appellant Pro Se. R. Trent McCotter, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In this 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) proceeding, James Edward Channell appeals the district court’s order granting Respondent’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, w¿ affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Channell v. Wilson,*No. 1:17-cv-00148-AJT-TCB, 2017 WL 6764333 (E.D. Va. Oct. 17, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7183** 

A NDREW BURL WRIGHT , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. MARY MITCHELL, Warden of FCI , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Di strict of South Carolina , at Greenville

. David C. Norton , Chief District Judge. ( 6:10

- cv - 03147

- DCN )

Submitted : November 15, 2011 Decided: November 18, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Andrew Burl Wright, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Andrew Burl Wright , a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court ’s order denying his motion to re consider the
court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2011) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wright v. Mitchell , No. 6:10

- cv - 03147

- DCN (D.S.C. Aug. 10, 2011) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid t he decisional process.

AFFIRMED