alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board

# AGENCY:

U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB).

# ACTION:

Notice of members of Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the membership of the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Review Board (CSB) Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance Review Board (PRB).

# DATES:

These appointments are effective on the date of publication of this notice to March 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Selena Simmons-Ferguson, HR Director, CSB, 1750 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Suite 910, (202) 510-3054.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(1) requires each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations with regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, a performance review board (PRB). The PRB reviews the initial performance ratings of members of the Senior Executive Service (SES) and makes recommendations for final annual performance ratings for senior executives. In addition, the PRB will review and recommend executive performance bonuses and pay increases.

Publication of the PRB membership is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). Because the CSB is a small independent Federal agency, in addition to members from the CSB, the agency is drawing an additional SES member for its PRB from another Federal agency. The members of the CSB's PRB have committed to serving a two-year term.

The Board shall consist of at least three members, and more than half of the members shall consist of career appointees. The following persons comprise a standing roster to serve as members of the CSB Senior Executive Service PRB: Bruce Walker, Senior Advisor, CSB; David LaCerte, Senior Advisor/Executive Counsel, CSB; Steven Klejst, Executive Director—Investigations and Recommendations, CSB; Susan Kantrowitz, Managing Director, CSB; and Jerold Gidner, Director, Bureau of Trust Funds Administration, U.S. Department of Interior.

Dated: March 16, 2022.

Tamara Qureshi,

Assistant General Counsel, Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board.

[FR Doc. 2022-05868 Filed 3-18-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 250 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  2d Session
S. RES. 250

 Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding tactile currency for the 
                      blind and visually impaired.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 24, 1996

   Mr. Brown (for himself, Mr. Faircloth, Ms. Moseley-Braun, and Mr. 
 Shelby) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
            Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding tactile currency for the 
                      blind and visually impaired.

Whereas currency is used by virtually everyone in everyday life, including blind 
        and visually impaired persons;
Whereas the Federal reserve notes of the United States are inaccessible to 
        individuals with visual disabilities;
Whereas the Americans with Disabilities Act enhances the economic independence 
        and equal opportunity for full participation in society for individuals 
        with disabilities;
Whereas most blind and visually impaired persons are therefore required to rely 
        upon others to determine denominations of such currency;
Whereas this constitutes a serious impediment to independence in everyday 
        living;
Whereas electronic means of bill identification will always be more fallible 
        than purely tactile means;
Whereas tactile currency already exists in 23 countries worldwide; and
Whereas the currency of the United States is presently undergoing significant 
        changes for security purposes: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) endorses the efforts recently begun by the Bureau of 
        Engraving and Printing to upgrade the currency for security 
        reasons; and
            (2) strongly encourages the Secretary of the Treasury and 
        the Bureau of Engraving and Printing to incorporate cost-
        effective, tactile features into the design changes, thereby 
        including the blind and visually impaired community in 
        independent currency usage.
                                 <all>
```
#### GREEN TREE SERVICING, L.L.C.; Walter Investment Management Corporation; Best Insurors, Incorporated; Mid State Capital, L.L.C.; Mid State Trust II; Mid State Trust III; Mid State Trust IV; Mid State Trust V; Mid State Trust VI; Mid State Trust VII; Mid State Trust VIII; Mid State Trust IX; Mid State Trust X; Mid State Trust XI; Wilmington Trust Company; Mid-State Capital Corporation 2004-1 Trust; Mid-State Capital Corporation 2005-1 Trust; Mid-State Capital Corporation 2006-1 Trust; Mid-State Capital Trust 2010-1, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. Stacy MILLER; April Miller, Defendants-Appellants

No. 17-60108 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed November 28, 2017

Kaytie Michelle Pickett, Esq., Andrew Scott Harris, Adam Stone, Jones Walker, L.L.P., Jackson, MS, for Plaintiffs-Appel-lees

Mitchell Dee Thomas, Esq., Logan *&*Mayo, P.A., Newton, MS, Peter Emmanuel Ferraro, Ferraro Law Firm, Austin, TX, Jeffery P. Reynolds, Esq., Senior Attorney, Jeffery P. Reynolds, P.A., Jackson, MS, for Defendants-Appellants

Before KING, ELROD, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

*398PER CURIAM: *

This case presents an identical issue to one we recently addressed in *Green Tree Servicing, L.L.C. v. Charles,*872 F.3d 637 (5th Cir. 2017): whether a district court’s order compelling arbitration and dismissing the case with prejudice constitutes a final appealable order when a case involving the same parties and essentially the same dispute is stayed in the district court pending arbitration. We held in *Charles*that the district court’s order was- not a final appealable order, and we therefore dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. *Id.*at 639-40. We similarly DISMISS this case for lack of jurisdiction,

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cm. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 303

Commending the Governments of Hungary and Romania on the occasion

of the signing of a Treaty of Understanding, Cooperation, and Good

Neighborliness.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 26, 1996

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. SIMON) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Commending the Governments of Hungary and Romania on

the occasion of the signing of a Treaty of Understanding,

Cooperation, and Good Neighborliness.

Whereas on September 16, 1996, a ‘‘Treaty of Understanding, Cooperation, and Good Neighborliness between Romania and the Republic of Hungary’’ was signed by

Gyula Horn, Prime Minister of Hungary, and by Nicolae

Vacaroiu, Prime Minister of Romania, in Timisoara/

Temesvar, Romania;

Whereas this agreement between the two governments is an

important step in contributing to the stability of that region and to reconciliation and cooperation among the nations of Central and Eastern Europe;
2

SRES 303 ATS

Whereas this agreement will enhance the participation of

both countries in the Partnership for Peace program and

will contribute to and facilitate their closer cooperation

with the members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and the eventual entry of these countries into full

NATO participation; and

Whereas this agreement is a further significant step in the

process of reconciliation between Hungary and Romania

and reflects the desire and effort of both countries to improve their economic cooperation, to foster the free movement of peoples between their countries, to expand military relationships, and to increase cultural and educational cooperation: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate, The Senate—

2 (1) commends the farsighted leadership shown

3 by both the government of Hungary and the govern4 ment of Romania in reaching agreement on the

5 Treaty of Understanding, Cooperation and Good

6 Neighborliness signed on September 16, 1996;

7 (2) commends the frank, open, and reasoned

8 political dialogue between officials of Hungary and

9 Romania which led to the treaty;

10 (3) commends the two countries for their ef11 forts to foster improved relations in all fields; and

12 (4) calls upon the President to utilize all avail13 able and appropriate means on behalf of the United

14 States to support the implementation of the provi15 sions of the ‘‘Treaty of Understanding, Cooperation,
3

SRES 303 ATS

1 and Good Neighborliness between Romania and the

2 Republic of Hungary’’ and to promote their efforts

3 for regional cooperation as the best means of bring4 ing these two countries into NATO and to ensure

5 lasting security in the region.

Æ
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 204

To authorize representation by Senate Legal Counsel.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 22, 1995

Mr. DOLE (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize representation by Senate Legal Counsel.

Whereas, in the case of Charles Okoren, et al. v. Fyfe Symington, et al., No. CV–95–2527–PHX–RCB, pending in

the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, the plaintiffs have named the United States Senate

as a defendant;

Whereas pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the

Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (2 U.S.C. sections

288b(a) and 288c(a)(1) (1994)), the Senate may direct

its counsel to defend the Senate in civil actions relating

to its official responsibilities: Now, therefore, be it
2

SRES 204 ATS

1 Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is author2 ized to represent the United States Senate in the case of

3 Charles Okoren, et al. v. Fyfe Symington, et al.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-4740

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus DOUGLAS J. DODSON, JR., a/k/a Becky, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CR-95-73) Submitted: April 29, 1999 Decided: May 5, 1999 Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andrea C. Long, BOONE, BEALE, COSBY & LONG, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Nicholas S. Altimari, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Douglas J. Dodson, Jr., was convicted of conspiracy to distribute heroin and cocaine, two counts of possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance, and possession of a firearm bya convicted felon. He was sentenced to life in prison for conspiracy, 240 months on each of the possession counts, and 120 months on the firearm count. The 240-month sentences and the 120- month sentence run concurrently with the life sentence. Judgment was imposed on September 21, 1998, and entered on the docket on September 22. Dodson, through his attorney, filed his notice of appeal on October 7, 1998. In criminal cases, a defendant must file his notice of appeal within ten days of the entry of judgment. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1), 26(a). Upon a showing of good cause or excusable neglect and with or without a motion, the district court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file the notice of appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes , 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985). When an appellant files a notice of appeal afterexpiration of the ten-day period but within the thirty-day extension period, unless excusable neglect or good cause is clear fromthe record, the district court must make factual findings concerning whether excusable neglect or good cause exists warranting extension of the appeal period. See id.3 Dodson’s notice of appeal was filed after expiration of the ten-day appeal period but within the thirty-day extension period.Accordingly, we remand this case to the district court with instructions to make factual findings concerning whether excusable neglect or good cause exists to justify extending the ten-day appeal period. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. We defer ruling on the motion to file a pro se supplemental brief pending a decision by the district court.

REMANDED
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Communications Commission [FR ID 76989]
 The following item has been adopted by the Commission and deleted from the list of items scheduled for consideration at the Wednesday, March 16, 2022, Open Meeting. This item was previously listed in the Commission's Sunshine Notice on Wednesday, March 9, 2022. 4
Media
Title: Restricted Adjudicatory Matter.Summary: The Commission will consider a restricted adjudicatory matter.
 
 The meeting will be webcast with open captioning at: 
                    *www.fcc.gov/​live.*
                     Open captioning will be provided as well as a text only version on the FCC website. Other reasonable accommodations for people with disabilities are available upon request. In your request, include a description of the accommodation you will need and a way we can contact you if we need more information. Last minute requests will be accepted but may be impossible to fill. Send an email to: 
                    *fcc504@fcc.gov*
                     or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530. Additional information concerning this meeting may be obtained from the Office of Media Relations, (202) 418-0500. Audio/Video coverage of the meeting will be broadcast live with open captioning over the internet from the FCC Live web page at 
                    *www.fcc.gov/​live.* Marlene Dortch, Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2022-05848 Filed 3-18-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 5 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 5

  Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to 
    commemorate the days of remembrance of victims of the Holocaust.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             February 7 (legislative day, January 30), 1995

 Mr. Stevens submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
         referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to 
    commemorate the days of remembrance of victims of the Holocaust.

Whereas, pursuant to such Act, the United States Holocaust Memorial Council has 
        designated April 23 through April 30, 1995, as ``Days of Remembrance of 
        Victims of the Holocaust''; and
Whereas the United States Holocaust Memorial Council has recommended that a one-
        hour ceremony be held at noon on April 27, 1995, consisting of speeches, 
        readings, and musical presentations as part of the days of remembrance 
        activities: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the rotunda of the United States Capitol is hereby authorized to 
be used on April 27, 1995, from 8 o'clock ante meridian until 3 o'clock 
post meridian for a ceremony as part of the commemoration of the days 
of remembrance of victims of the Holocaust. Physical preparations for 
the conduct of the ceremony shall be carried out in accordance with 
such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

To the Board of Directors of HSBC Finance Corporation:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-132348-05 on Form S-3 of HSBC Home Equity Loan Trust (USA) 2006-4 of our reports dated March 5, 2007 included as Exhibits 34.1, 34.2, 34.3 and 34.4 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of HSBC Home Equity Loan Trust (USA) 2006-4 for the year ended December 31, 2006.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois

March 28, 2007
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: March 31, 2009
    
    By:
    
    /s/ H. Kerr TaylorName:
    
    H. Kerr TaylorTitle
    
    President and Chief Executive Officer
of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth IV
Corporation, the General Partner of
AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund
IV, L.P.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,577,504
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  542,593
<ALLOWANCES>                                    33,516
<INVENTORY>                                  1,077,777
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,695,118
<PP&E>                                       3,730,416
<DEPRECIATION>                               (600,948)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,103,181
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          558,887
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,965,060
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,103,181
<SALES>                                      2,427,822
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,427,822
<CGS>                                        1,166,453
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                49,970
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              73,653
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                541,575
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   541,575
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09
        


</TABLE>
# C o urt o f A ppe a ls

o f th e S ta te o f G e o rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 4 A1 76 9 . FREDERI CK ANTW AN GI LYARD v . THE STATE.

I n Oc to ber 2023, Fred eric k An t wa n G i l y a r d wa s i n d i ct e d fo r a ggrav ated assau lt,

f alse imp riso nment, an d b a t t e r y. I n Febru a ry and A p ril 2024, Gilyard filed p ro se

general d e m u r rers and a mo tio n to d ismiss the ind ic tment. A fter a hearing, the trial

c o u rt d e nied all the mo tio ns. Gilyard t hen f iled this d i r ec t ap p eal. W e lac k j urisd ic tio n.

Und er OCGA § 5- 6

- 34 (a) (1 )

, d irec t ap p eals generally may be tak en f ro m “ [a]ll

f inal j u dgments, t hat i s t o say, w here t he c ase is no lo nger pend ing in the c o urt

belo w [. ]” A c riminal c ase is no t f inal and r ip e f

o r ap p eal u ntil all o f the c harges against

the d e f end ant hav e b een reso lv ed

. See Keller v

. Sta te

, 27 5 Ga. 6 80, 6 80- 6 81 (57 1 SE2d

806 ) ( 2002) (ho ld ing that a c rimin a l c ase remains p end ing u ntil the c o u rt enters a

w ritten j u d gment of c o nv ic t io n and sentenc e o n eac h co u nt). Gilyard ’s case remains

p end ing as it has yet t o go to trial, and thu s, Gilyard w as requ ired to f o l l o w t he

interlo c u to ry ap p eal p ro c ed u res o u tlined in OCGA § 5- 6- 34 (b). Gilyard ’ s failu r e to

d o s o dep riv es u s o f j u risd i c t io n o v er this ap p eal. See OCGA § 5

- 6

- 34 (b); Iv ey v

.

S ta te

, 21 0 Ga. Ap p

. 7 82, 7 83 (437 SE2d 81 0) (1 9 9 3) (ap p eal o f o rd e r ov erru ling

d emu rrer requ ired c o m p l i a nc e w ith interlo c u to ry ap peal p ro c ed u re); S tewa rt v

. S ta te

,

240 Ga. Ap p

. 1 54, 1 54 (522 SE2d 7 43) (1 9 99 ) (o rd er d enying a mo tio n to d ismiss an

ind ic tment is an interlo c u to ry o rd er). July 19, 2024Fo r this reaso n, this ap p eal is hereby D I SM I SSED

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a ls o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O ffic e , A t la n t a ,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

I c e r t ify t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e

x t r a c t fr o m

t h e m in u t e s o f t h e C o u r t o f A pp e a ls o f G e o r g ia

.

W it n e s s m y s ig n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a id c o u r t

h e r e t o a ffix e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r la s t a b o v e w r

it t e n

.

, C le r

k

. 07/19/2024